The URL can be used to link to this page

031488 CC Reg AgP CI'lY CP SlDREWOC1) RIG.JIAR akB:IL" MEETIR; MCHlAY, MMOI 14, 1988 . ..fl CXlJlCIL CHAMBERS 5755 CXXJR.rRl CLtI1~ ..lU\Q 7:30 P.M. AGENDA CALL m <R>ER A. Pledge of Allegiance B. Roll Call Gagne Brancel Mayor Rasoop, Haugen, Stover / ~ ../. / c/ .30 1i 1. APPBO\1AL (p IID1l1.rES A. Regular Council Meeting - February 22, 1988 (Att.No.lA-Minutes) 2. MTmRS FRCM THE FIOOR A. B. 3. PlANNING CQlUSSICfi RBPORl' A. B. 4. PARK CQlUSSI~ RBPORl' A. B. 5. c:x:6SPXl' AGIR)A A. Awointnent of Assistant Weed Inspector - Dennis Johnson (Att.No. SA-Appointnent Form) B. payuent Voucher No.3 - City Hall Expansion Project - Zastrow - Nassett Construction Calpany, Inc. (Att.No.5B-payment Voucher) C. -Easy Race- Approval Moved Seoorx3ed Vote ~li/~J & ee-.~'~ ~ ~ 'it";;} (Att.No.5C-Letter of Request) -1- AGIRlA 1IRlAY, IWQI 14, 1988 .' PAGE 'DiO c 6. R1!X:Yn.TR; REPORT BY :IMnnFJ:; CAPESIUS FOR EAGLE SDJ1' BADGE 7. S1'ATUS RBI?ORT INSrAI.IATIOO CBRIBlMAS IME RlN>/CBRIS11IAS IAR: COL-DE-SAC 8. SIMPLE SDII>IVISIOO All) camDJ1d'I~ A{:plicant: Mike Pflaum - Lun:}gren Bros. Construction Location: 19595 Near Mountain Boulevard (Att.No.8-Staff Report) 9. FINAL HAT - SIIEE'lWA'mR 2lI) ADDIfi~ Applicant: Lun:}gren Bros. Construction Location: Near Mountain Developnent (Att.No.9-Staff Report) 10. REZ~ - WIlD DOCK 31{) ADDITIOO Applicant: City of Shorewood Location: Wild Duck 3rd Addition (Att.No.I0-Staff Report) 11. SE:'IBACK VARIAlCE & VARIAlCE it) EXPAH) A lDHXR'OHUR; ST1IJC'1'ORE Applicant: Robe rt Miesen Location: 5570 Soore Road (Att.No.l1-Staff Report & letters) 12. ZCJfIt<<; (a>I~ ~ MElUIPB1' Applicant: Dick Dreher, Dreher & Assoc., Inc. (Att.No.12-Staff Eeport) 13. CCR)ITI<R\L USE PEIllIT - 00'J.t)()()l DISPLAY & 8.roRAGE Applicant: Charles Crepeau - Cre~au Dock Tan Lingo - Garden Patch Location: 23425 & 23445 8nithtown Road (Att.No.13-Staff Report) 14. REAPPROVAL RDlESl' fOR ClJTI.01' A CP GiK ADDI'l'I~ Applicant: Tan Wickenheiser Location: North of Highway 7 - East of Wiltsey Lane (Att.No.14"'Letter of Request and staff Report) -2- AGItI)A . 1IBlPJ, MAK::B 14, 1988 P}S mREE 15. PLAtRmS RBfORl' A. Slx>rewood Interceptor - Sewer Capacity Problem B. 16. ~S RBPOR1' A. !lCC Status Report B. Bayswater Road Right-of-Way Report C. Village Punp Status Report D. 17. J!KIDEBRS ~. A. Change Order No.1 - S.E. Area Punp House - Project No. 86-1C (Att.No.l7A-change Order No.1) B. paynent Voucher No.4 - S.E. Area Pu11p House - Project No. 86-1C - A & K Construction, Inc. (Att.No.l7B-Payment Voucher) C. Pressure Reducing Values - S.E. Area Water System (Att.No.17C-Report) D. 18. AlJUNISTBATIVE !<BI:()kL' A. Equipnent Sharing Policy - Public Works Depart:nent B. Software Implemation - Finance Depart:nent C. Staffing Needs - Finance Depart:nent D. Amendment to Water & Sewer Service Agreement - Tonka Bay/Slx>rewood (Att.No.18D-Staff Report) E. Glen Road/County Road 119 Drainage Project - Status Report F. Cooparable Worth Update G. -3- ~ 1DIlAY, MAlOl 14, 1988 PAtE POOR If . 19. MAYOBS J&.(Rl' A. B. 20. <XlH:IL .RB1QQS A. B. 21. APPlOJAL (P CIAIMS AM) ADJa&IIBIfl' -4- CITY OF SHOREWOOD ... 'REGULAR COUNCIL ME~G MONDAY, FEBRUARY 22, 1988 . AtNEWASHTA SCHOOL ""350 SMITHTOWN ROAD 7:30 P.M. . M I NUT E S .L_ CALL !'O ORDER The Regular Council Meeting of the Shorewood City Council was ~alled to order at 7:30 p.m., Monday, February 22, 1988, by Mayor Rascop. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE AND PRAYER Mayor Rascop opened the Regular Council Meeting with the Pledge of Allegiance and a Prayer. ROLL CALL Present: Mayor Rascop, Councilmembers Haugen, Gagne and Brancel. Absent: Councilmember Stover (Vacation). Staff Attorney Froberg, Engineer Norton, Administrator Vogt, Financial Director Beck and Deputy Clerk Niccum. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Gagne moved, seconded by Brancel, to approve the minutes of the Regular Council Meeting of February 8, 1988 as amended on pages three and six. Motion carried - 4 ayes. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR Mr. Rick Dyer of 6070 Brand Circle was present to state that despite promises to have the Christmas Lake Road/Christmas Lane cul-de-sac installed in July of 1987, nothing has been done. He referred to the video tape presented to the Council saying the same problems still exists and his children are being endangered. He stated that the same garbage trucks are still creating the same problem, as well as City plows turning around in Mrs. Clark's driveway on Mill Street and creating a traffic hazard. Gagne said the cul-de-sac was not completed in July due to the fact that it takes time to put in a street properly, and that several property ownership problems had appeared making it impossible to do the work before weather prevented completion. He also said he would talk to Public Works Director about the snowplow problem. Council requested a report from staff by the March 14th meeting. They also requested that Police Chief Young be asked to attend that meeting to discuss the issue. PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT There was no Planning Commission report. -1- III .: MINUTES ~ , MONDAY, FEBRUARY 2~1988 PAGE TWO PARK COMMISSION REPORT . Chairman Vogel was present to report: The Commission is turning down Mr. Frank Reese's Architectural proposal on the Manor Park Warm1ng House/Pavilion. The Commission still hopes to build some type of structure in Manor Park. Vogel stated that $40,000.00 is approximately one-half of the total Park Capital Improvement Fund and the Commission does not feel they can justify spending that much money, especially for indoor plumbing when it will only be in use 2 months of the year and there will still be an additional 10 month sattelite cost. He said they are talking to Sussell about a garage style building. Vogel said they are still having snowmobile problems, Niccum will contact the Southwest Trail Association for suggestions on how to deal with the problem. Vogel said the Commission is still looking for a monthly financial report with enough of a breakdown to use in figuring their potential bond referendum. According to Finance Director Beck, in order to provide the information requested in the detail requested by the Commission, it would have to be taken from individual timesheets because this information is not available from the computer, consequently time spent in doing so would be charged to the Parks. Mayor Rascop suggested that staff meet with the Commission to discuss the issue. Administrator Vogt said plans have already been made to do so at the March 21st meeting. CONSENT AGENDA Purchase of Used Hvdraulic Articulated Motor Grader RESOLUTION NO.12-88 Staff recommends the purchase of a grader from Ziegler, Inc. at a cost of $42,000.00. ~ procla~ation of Volunteers of America Week RESOLUTION NO.13-88 fJ.Q' , Staff recommends proclaiming a week in March as Volunteers of America Week, as done in previous years. Correction to Minutes Correction of November 23, 1987 minutes - Sewer and Water Budget Approval - paragraph 2, line 3. Request to Pass Out Candy for the Mentally Retarded by Kni9hts of Columbus The Knights of Columbus Council 15268 requested permission to hand out Tootsie Rolls at Driskill's April 22-24, and ask for donations. Gagne moved, seconded by Haugen, to approve the Consent Agenda. Motion carried by Roll Call Vote - 4/0. -2- MINUTES . MONDAY, PEBRUARY 22, 988 PAGE THREE . PUBLIC HEARING PROPOSED USED OP BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM YEAR XIV COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT RESOLUTION NO.14-e8 Mayor Rascop opened the Public Hearing at 7:45 p.m. Two members of the Senior Community Services were present to explain what they do and to thank the Council for their consideration. Haugen asked them about a daily outreach program, saying she hoped the .mature adults. in Shorewood had this service. Administrator Vogt explained Rehabilitation of Private Property, how its being used, the need for it, and how it benefits the City. Mayor Rascop closed the Public Hearing at 7:50 p.m. Gagne moved, seconded by Haugen, to approve use of the $19,177.00 Year XIV Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant Planning allocation for Rehabilitation of Private Property ($13,689.00) and operations at the South Shore Senior Center ($5,488.00). Motion carr~ed by Roll Call Vote - 4/0. WEIGHT RESTRICTION ORDINANCE PROPOSED CODE AMENDMENT ORDINANCE NO.205 Administrator Vogt said the proposed code amendment has been discussed with Attorney Froberg, Engineer Norton, Public Works Director Zdrazil, and Planner Nielsen. All the streets have been reviewed and staff recommends approval. ,\0 Haugen moved, seconded by Brancel, to dispense with the second reading and to adopt the 1st draft of the Ordinance amending Section 801.09 of the Shorewood City Code~mposing seasonal weight restrictions upon the use of streets ef highways within the City, thus exempting the specifically listed streets from the 4 ton limit and g~v~ng them a 6 ton limit from March 1 to May 1. All remaining streets remain at 4 tons. Motion carried by Roll Call Vote - 4/0. PINDINGS OP PACT - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DENIAL ROY AHERN - 5540 SHORE ROAD RESOLUTION NO.15-88 Gagne moved, seconded by Brancel, to approve the Resolution denying a Conditional Use Permit for the construction of a private residence on Lot 11 with the following changes: Paragraph 4 - line 2 - strike (s) after application Findings of Fact 1, - line 4 -...that Lot 11 (is) therefore, would fall under the classification of a "substandard lot." Motion carried by Roll Call Vote - 4/0. -3- IlINUTES 1l0NDAY, FEBRUARY 22 ~88 PAGE FOUR . AftORNEYS REPORT . Bayswater Road Mailboxes - Status Report A letter was sent to the residents explaining the amendment to the Ordinance. This provides the Council the right to make exceptions to the code under certain circumstances. Village Pump A letter was sent to the owner regarding the zoning violation regarding outdoor storage. Froberg was contacted by the owners Attorney who stated they have received an offer for the purchase of the property and are asking for an extension of a few days. Haugen moved, seconded by Brancel, that the City Attorney commence legal action to enforce the Ordinance if the items illegally stored outdoors are not removed by February 27th which is the date given in Attorney Froberg's notice to remove. Motion carried by Roll Call Vote - 4/0. Metropolitan Waste Control Commission A meeting has been scheduled for Tuesday, March 1, 1988 at the Metro Waste Control Commission at Ray Odde's request. Staff members will be present. Mr. Odde's main positions that the portion of the sewer system that is constituted by the MWCC interceptor is not the cause of the inflow and infiltration and feels the T.V. tapes will bear this out. He would like to see similar tapes of our lines, especially the Islands. Engineer Norton said it would be difficult to duplicate MWCC's information as all their lines have been televised and individual monitors were used on manholes. Council considered asking MWCC if we can televise some of their lines. Haugen asked if the fact that MWCC freely admitted at the time of the I & I study that 50.2% was due to I & I, much of it in the area of the interceptors would make a difference. Gagne asked about getting bids for cleaning and televising. Administrator Vogt said cleaning and televising can't be done until its warmer but that information is being gathered to obtain bids. Council discussed the City's legal rights. Attorney Froberg said this would not become an issue unless litigation began. HtN~ERS REPORT /?, .1 'I:JA~u~___"... v2~ - cS ~""~-'<"r.AV _ Admin~strator Vogt said staff talked to the surveyor today and the survey was to be picked up today. Mr. Arvidson presented the survey to the Council and explained where his property is. He will take the survey to the Watershed District to apply for repair~ng the retaining wall and rip-rapping. He also presented the Attorney's disortation rights showing the City's easement and that it was originally deeded to Excelsior Township. A . None. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT Glen Road/County Road 19 Drainage Pro;ect Administrator Vogt said the Board of Managers from the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District met on February 18th to discuss the Feasibility Report work plan. It was approved. The Watershed District Engineer Jim Mahady will meet with the Cities in the next week to discuss financing the feasibility study. The City of Tonka Bay, a private property owner, and the City of Shorewood have all agreed to pay a portion of the costs. The total work plan budget estimate came to $6,064.00. Gagne stated he had received a letter dated February 17 stating that the Minnehaha Watershed District, due to budget limitations, the Board of Managers wili not review proposals from municipalities for cost sharing of maintenance and repair projects. This will not affect the Glen Road/County Road 19 project. Request to Participate in Program to Provide Energy Conservation Services to Residents - West Hennepin Human Services Administrator Vogt said the City's participation consists of getting word out that it's available. He recommended using H.U.D. Section 8 guidelines. He said in Tonka Bay 50 out of 600 homes were done. Haugen Program Section - 4/0. moved, seconded by Gagne, to approve participation in the to Provide Energy Conservation Services to residents using 8 low income Guidelines. Motion carried by Roll Call Vote Cable Program Vogt explained he had been approached to participate in a cable program with City Administrators and Managers to discuss recent Council actions, Agenda's, and toward the end of the program a discussion on a general issue that involves all the cities. The Council suggested he participate. March 14 Council Meeting Vogt informed the Council tomorrow~nd the next meeting -rIlLe Excelsior~Contract that staff is moving into the addition will be held at City Hall. RESOLUTION NO.16-88 Vogt explained a policies, and is It must then be Association. He $37,776.00. 2% tax is collected on all Homeowners insurance reimbursed to cities that have Fire Departments. paid to the treasurer of the Fire Relief said in 1987 the Excelsior Department received A Financial Association. Marshall. 0.. ~ d 11 1/')1\ . I?<::l-.--.......__.;f.{,_ statement has been requested from the Fire Relief Council also discussed the hiring of a full time Fire -5- MINUTES ... . RONDAY, FEBRUARY 22 ;-1988 PAGE SIX COUNCIL REPORTS . Office Supplies Brancel stated that she feels too much is being spent on office supplies, $6,000.00 a year. She would like to see the purchase order numbers included on the check lists. Council asked Vogt about this and he said he usually reviews the orders and did not feel spending was excess, and that items purchased had been budgeted for. Purchase Orders are supplied with bills. Hennepin County Legislative Bill - Planning & Zoning Act Haugen asked regarding the suggested the Administrator Orono. if the Council had looked over Gen Hennepin County Legislative Bill. Council review the letter carefully. Vogt to discuss the bill with Mark Olson's letter Mayor Rascop And to direct Bernhardson of Equipaent Loaning to Other Cities Gagne discussed loaning out expensive equipment to other cities, saying the City spent $423,000.00 on equipment in 1984-88. He was concerned and asked that this item be placed on the next agenda. MAYORS REPORT Metropolitan Waste Control Commission Meeting A meeting will be held on the improvement of accuracy to measure wastewater control. Public Hearing and Handling A meeting will be held in Eden Prairie on February 24. Water Resource Management for Sewage Treatment Planning and Zoning Act The Mayor expressed concern over the sponsors intrepretation of this bill. Police Building The Council expressed concern over the lack of communication from Excelsior regarding the police building. The cost is at the max. One concern is the two car garage with other cars left outside and the need to remove everything from those cars. An equity sharing agreement has not been discussed. Administrator Vogt said Tonka Bay's Administrator and Excelsior's City Manager, along with himself, are meeting Wednesday to discuss equity sharing. He also said that both he and Tonka Bay's Administrator, have made it very clear to Excelsior that they expect equity if they decide to pull out he said they don't feel they should pay 50% of the building and when the contract is done, have nothing. -6- MINUTES . . 6JlONDAY, FEBRUARY 22 988 PAGE SEVEN MAYORS REPORT - CONTINUED . Police Building - continued Mayor Rascop mentioned addressing the Council. attending an Excelsior Council Meeting and He also suggested talking to Chief Young. Regional Transit Board Meeting Rascop asked Haugen, as representative to this Commission, if she had received a letter, she did. Grants and Special Proiects - Olya~ics A letter was received requesting support for the Summer Olympics in 1996 in Minneapolis-St. Paul. Council will study the material and discuss it at a later date. LMCD Rascop reported that the LMCD is trying to set up a meeting with Metropolitan Council. Televising Appearance Mayor Rascop will appear on television Thursday, April 4, 1988, at 6:30 p.m., on Channel 20. ADJOURNMENT Haugen moved, seconded by meeting of Monday, February approval of claims for payment. Gagne, to adjourn the Regular Council 22, 1988 at 9:02 p.m., subject to Motion carried - 4/0. GENERAL AND LIOUOR FUNDS - ACCT. NO. 00-00166-02 Checks 1052435-052476, 052490-052550 General $ 94,621.94 Liquor $28,174.52 Payroll Checklist: Checks 1201916-201950 Total S 10,619.78 $105,241.72 S 2,804.02 $30,978.54 RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, Robert Rascop Mayor Susan Niccum Deputy Clerk -7- ... CITY OF SHOREWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING TUESDAY. 1 MARCH 1988 ~ COUNCIL CHAMBERS 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD 7:30 P.M. MI NUT E S CALL TO ORDER Chair Watten called the meeting to order at 7:34 P.M. ROLL CALL Present: Chair Watten; Commissioners Schultz. Robertson. Leslie. Benson; Council Liaison Stover; Planner Nielsen; Planning Assist. Helgesen. Absent: Commissioners Spellman and Mason (both excused). APPROVAL OF MINUTES Robertson moved. seconded by Schultz to approve the minutes of 2 February 1988 as written. Motion carried unanimously. 7 :30 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING - ZONING ORDINANCE TEXT AMENDMENT Dick Dreher - Dreher and Associates. Inc. Planner Nielsen said that Dreher and Associates. Inc. have proposed to build a shopping center and Tom Thumb store at 5620 and 5660 Co. Rd. 19. and would like to do so as a commercial planned unit developement (P.U.D.). Nielsen said that provision for Commercial P.U.D. is not included in the current Zoning Ordinance. Amending the text to include same would allow commercial development with more control on the part of the City. P.U.D. would also allow more flexibility and eliminate the need for multiple C.U.P.'s and possible variances via a development agreement and covenants. Commerical P.U.D. could be allowed by conditional use permit. Public portion of the public hearing opened at 7:35 P.M. Mr. Dreher presented a rendering of his proposed project to the Commission. Public portion of the public hearing closed at 7:56 P.M. without comment. Schultz asked what mechanism would govern maintenance where separate ownership of a common project is involved. Planner Nielsen said that there would be a development agreement between the City and all parties involved. as well as a maintenance agreement through owner-association. which is required as part of a P.U.D. Watten said that he would like more time to study this issue. Schultz noted that the Ordinance could always be changed back again. Benson said it is his impression that P.U.D. works more in favor of the City. Schultz moved. seconded by Leslie. to recommend to Council approval of the draft text amendment which extends planned unit development provisions to commercial property by conditional use. The conditional use approach would also extend to residential. Uses allowed in a P.U.D./C.U.P. would be limited to those listed in individual districts. Motion carried by roll call vote - 4 ayes - 1 nay (Watten. who said he would like more time to study this issue). This item will appear on the Council agenda of 14 March 1988. Minutes Planning Commission Meeting 1 March 1988 7:45 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING - SETBACK VARIANCE AND VARIANCE TO EXPAND A NONCONFORMING STRUCTURE Robert Miesen - 5570 Shore Road Planner Nielsen explained that Mr. Miesen would like to add a second story, an attached garage, and some decking to his existing home which does not meet current lakeshore or front yard setbacks. Nielsen pointed out that the proposed additions do meet the average setback line as established by structures on adjoining lots. The plans include demolition of a dilapidated carport on the north side of Shore Road. He noted that rebuilding a garage on the north side of Shore Road is questionable due to soil conditions. Public portion of the public hearing opened at 8:18 P.M. Watten acknowledged letters of support submitted by: Tad and Mary Shaw, 5580 Shore Road, endorsed the Miesen's plans. Mr. and Mrs. T. Gerald Hayes, 5560 Shore Road, in favor of the request. Mary Hayes Ulning, 5550 Shore Road, in favor of the request. Gloria Garretson, 5590 Shore Road, stated that she is in favor of the request, and delighted to hear that the old carport will be removed. Karen Miesen (applicant), said that they are relocating from Chicago, Ill. and plan to make this their permanent residence, however the house is too small for their needs. Public portion of the public hearing closed at 8:21 P.M. Schultz said that since the house has been inhabited over the years as is, then the structure has been put to reasonable use. He added that the conditions of the property which exist today are no different than when they purchased the house, therefore they brought on the hardship themselves. Benson said he doesn't feel this request is out of character with previous similar requests granted approval. He said he isn't bothered by expansion within the existing footprint of the foundation. The Ordinance provides for 2-1/2 story dwellings and this structure is only one story. Benson moved to recommend to Council approval of the setback variance. Motion died for lack of a second. Planner Nielsen reminded the Commission that the Zoning Ordinance recognizes the average setback line, and the proposed additions do meet those setbacks. Schultz moved, seconded by Robertson to recommend to Council denial of the setback variance and variance to expand a nonconforming structure, on the basis that the request does not satisfy the criteria which establishes hardship. Motion carried by roll call vote - 3 ayes - 2 nays (Leslie and Benson). This item will appear on the Council agenda of 14 March 1988. Mr. Miesen said he doesn't feel anyone benefits from the Commission's decision. - 2 - Minutes Planning Commission Meeting 1 March 1988 8:00 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING - REZONING AND PRELIMINARY PLAT (LAWTONKA) Joe N. Boyer and Sons - 5580 Timber Lane Planner Nielsen reported that Mr. Boyer is requesting a rezoning of approximately 4.76 acres from R-1A to R-1C. He stated that the proposed density is compatible with the Comprehensive Plan. Mr. Boyer then proposes to divide the property into 7 single-family residential lots. with an average size of 25~240 square feet. Nielsen added that Mr. Don Shafer of 23880 Smithtown Road. who is conveying most of the property Mr. Boyer is platting. should include the portion of land he will retain as Lot 8 (Mr. Shafer's residence). Public portion of the public hearing opened at 9:01 P.M. Mike Arvidson. 5595 Timber Lane. said he objects to the location of the proposed cul-de-sac because it will end up across from his driveway. Mr. Arvidson said he feels the cul-de-sac should cut across the R.R. r.o.w. and access Timber Lane. He also objected to the rezoning saying that the proposed lots are too small. Planner Nielsen said that previous requests to cross the R.R. r.o.w. have been denied by the Railroad Authority. Steve Haskins. 5455 Timber Lane. questioned where Lot 8 would be and where City water would come from. Planner Nielsen pointed out both on the plat. He also questioned some docks shown which he said do not exist. Larry Hansen of Schoell and Madson Engineering said he made the plat from an old topography on which the docks were shown. Lee Webster. 5525 Timber Lane. asked if any lots will have direct access to the shoreline. Mr. Boyer said none have direct access. Steve Haskins asked what the market values will be of the homes to be built. Pete Boyer said they will range from $350.000 to $450.000. Rob Schultz. 23780 Smithtown Road. said he has no objection to the request. including the location of the cul-de-sac. and would like to use the new road to access his property. Dan Puzak. 23830 Smithtown Road. said he supports the project and would also like to access the new road. however. he said he would prefer 30.000 sq. ft. lots. Mike Arvidson said John Cross was able to obtain r.o.w. from the Railroad Authority to access his Yacht Club. Lee Webster said he would like to have City water brought into the area. Public portion of the public hearing closed at 9:21 P.M. Schultz asked for clarification of the lot lines containing Don Shafer's property. Planner Nielsen pointed out same on plat explaining that Mr. Shafer's residence will be located on Lot 8. and Mr. Shafer will also retain ownership of a separate parcel to be platted as Lot 6 (a separate buildable lot accessing the new cul-de-sac). however. the current lot lines of Shafer's property will need to be reconfigured for proper lot width as Lot 6. - 3 - Minutes Planning Commission Meeting 1 March 1988 Rezoning and Preliminary Plat (Lawtonka). continued: Leslie moved. seconded by Benson. to recommend to Council approval of the rezoning from R-1A to R-1C. Schultz questioned the proposed value range of the homes on 1/2 acre lots. Pete Boyer said this works the best for them. Planner Nielsen cautioned the Commission tha there is no guarantee that the stated value range will definitely be built. Motion carried unanimously by roll call vote - 5 ayes. Schultz moved. seconded by Leslie. to recommend to Council approval of the preliminary plat subject to recommendations in the Planner's report (listed below). reconfiguation of the width of Lot 6. and that the two separate lakeshore parcels be assigned by covenants exclusively to Lots 1 and 2. Planner's recommendations: 1. If the lot line between Lots 6 and 7 is to be changed. the lot line should remain straight and radiate from the center of the cul-de-sac. Lot 7 should retain at least 20.000 square feet of area even if it requires shifting the road somewhat. 2. Access to the new street by the two lots south of the plat should be encouraged. 3. Grading. drainage and utility plans must be subject to favorable review and comment by the City Engineer. Grading and drainage are also subject to approval by the Watershed District. 4. The applicant must submit up-to-date (within 30 days) title op1n10ns for the two parcels of land for review by the City Attorney. This should clarify the easement issue. 5. The final plat should include the portion of Mr. Shafer's property with his house on it as Lot 8. 6. Once a final plat is submitted. the staff will prepare a standard development agreement for the project. 7. Park dedication fees should be subject to the Park Commission's recommendation. Fees would amount to $3000. Credit is allowed for the house on Lot 1 and Mr. Shafer's residence. Larry Hansen said that Mr. Boyer will widen the r.o.w. to accommodate access to the new road by existing lots south of the new road. Schultz amended his motion to include the requirement that the two properties south of the new road arrange access to same. Robertson seconded. Motion carried unanimously by roll call vote - 5 ayes. This item will appear on the Council agenda of 14 March 1988. - 4 - Minutes Planning Commission Meeting 1 March 1988 8:15 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING - REZONING City of Shorewood - Wild Duck 3rd Addition Planner Nielsen reviewed his staff report. He said that rezoning Lots 1 - 13 from R-2A to R-2B will bring the current lot sizes into conformity. Public portion of the public hearing opened at 9:57 P.M. George Hipp. 5745 Wood Duck Cir.. said he has no objection to the rezoning. however. he would like to see Wood Duck Circle become a public street before it is rezoned. The developer (Jim Dutcher) has not completed the street's constuction to City standards yet. He said he would also like to see a street light at the end of Wood Duck Circle. Stover informed him that the street light should be petitioned by the neighborhood after the road becomes a public street. Public portion of the public hearing closed at 10:01 P.M. Leslie moved. seconded by Robertson to recommend to Council to approve rezoning Lots 1 - 13 and Outlot C. Block 1. Wild Duck 3rd Addition from R-2A to R-2B contingent upon resolving that Wood Duck Circle become a public street. Motion carried unanimously. This item will appear on the Council agenda of 14 March 1988. 8:30 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT. OUTDOOR DISPLAY AND STORAGE Charles Crepeau and Tom Lingo - 23425 and 23445 Smithtown Road Planner Nielsen reviewed the history of this request which began in 1985. On 6 August 1985 the Planning Commission recommended approval of a conditional use permit subject to the applicant submitting a parking lot plan; that he work with Hennepin Co. regarding access drives; that the parking lot and curbing be done according the the Shorewood Zoning Ordinance; a finished landscape plan be approved by the City Planner; and that signage be consistent with the Shorewood Zoning Ordinance. Public portion of the public hearing opened at 10:04 P.M. Mr. Crepeau objects to installing continuous poured concrete perimeter curbing around the parking lot because of the soils condition and water table causing damage to it every year. Planner Nielsen said he now has the survey and landscape plan. and a soils report has been submitted for review and recommendation from the City Engineer. Public portion of the public hearing closed at 10:30 P.M. Schultz said he would like to see something in place of the concrete curbing. if the curbing is not recommended by the City Engineer. He would also like to see additional landscaping to screen the outdoor storage along the side and rear of the Crepeau Dock building. - 5 - Minutes Planning Commission Meeting 1 March 1988 Leslie moved. seconded by Benson to recommend to Council approval of a conditiohal use permit for open and outdoor storage as an accessory use; open or outdoor service. sale. rental and display as an accessory use; and fabrication (cutting. assembly. and/or welding) of wood or metal products only when accessory to an activity allowed as a permitted use or conditional use within the C-4 District. subject to: 1. The subject property shall be developed and maintained based upon the approved site plan. 2. The property shall comply with the requirements of Section 1201.03 Subd. 4. b. - d. of the Shorewood City Code. 3. The applicant must obtain an access permit from the Hennepin Co. Department of Transportation. 4. The parking lot shown on the site plan shall be paved. curbed and striped in accordance with plans approved by the City Engineer (and adhered to the City Ordinance to the extent possible). 5. Landscaping must be maintained in compliance with a landscape plan approved by the City Council (or City Planner. and with the addition of landscape screening for the Crepeau Dock outdoor storage). 6. Signage shall be installed and maintained in accordance with Section 1201.03 Subd. 11 of the Shorewood City Code. Motion carried unanimously. This item will appear on the Council agenda of 14 March 1988. SIMPLE SUBDIVISION/COMBINATION Mike Pflaum. Lundgren Bros. Const. - 19595 Near Mt. Blvd.. 6000 & 6010 McKinley Place Planner Nielsen reviewed his staff report. Lot line rearrangement is being proposed to accommodate grade change problems and house locations. All lots will still comply with Zoning Ordinance requirements. Schultz moved. seconded by Leslie to recommend to Council approval of the simple subdivision/combination subject to the Planner's recommendations: 1. The applicant must provide up-to-date (within 30 days) title opinions for review by the City Attorney. 2. New drainage aned utility easements must be provided to replace the ones which will be vacated. 3. The applicant must provide the items listed in 1 and 2 above within 30 days of the Council's approval of their request. 4. Once they have the resolution they must record it within 30 days. Motion carried unanimously. This item will appear on the Council agenda of 14 March 1988. - 6 - . Minutes Planning Commission Meeting 1 March 1988 MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR None. REPORTS Planner Nielsen updated the Commission on the Arvidson dock complaint. Schultz suggested that the City amend the zoning of the Lake South Automotive site from C-1 to residential so that it conforms with the Comprehensive Plan. Commissioners suggested that Planner Nielsen research the legal ramifications involved in such a rezoning. ADJOURNMENT Leslie moved. seconded by Benson to adjourn the meeting at 11:13 P.M. Motion carried unanimously. Respectfully submitted. Patti Helgesen Planning Assistant - 7 - ~ Minnesota Sta~e Deportment of Agriculture AGRONOMY SERVICES DIVISION 90 WEST PLATO BOULEVARD SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55107 TELEPHONE: (612) 296-'123 NOTICE OF APPOINTMENT OF ASSISTANT WEED INSPECTOR FOR CITY OR TOWNSHIP INSTRUCTIONS J' COMPLETE THIS FORM IN TRIPLICATE. 2' SENV: Al ORIGINAL TO THE ATTENTION OF THE SECTION OF WEEV CONTROL AT THE ABOVE AVVRESS. BI fIRST COpy TO YOUR COUNTY AGRICULTURAL INSPECTOR. CI SECONV COpy TO YOUR LOCAL CLERK. .. NAME OF PERSON APPOINTED Dennis Johnson - APPOINTMENT LOCATION - ADDRESS 5755 Country Club Road CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE Shorewood MN 55331 TELEPHONE NO. IINCLUVE AREA COVEl 612-474-3236 CITY OR TOWNSHIP NAME Shorewood COUIITY Hennepin DATE OF APPOIIITMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH MINNESOTA STATUTES 18.231, PARAGRAPHS Z AND 3, PERTAINING TO ASSISTANT WEED INSPECTORS, THE ABOVE-NAMED PERSON IS HEREBY APPOINTED TO BE ASSISTANT WEED INSPECTOR FROM THE DATE INDICATED UNTIL SUCH TIME AS THE MAYOR OR TOWN BOARD WISHES TO TERMINATE THE APPOINTMENT. THIS APPOINTMENT CONFERS ON THE APPOINTEE ALL THE DUTIES, AUTHORITY, AND PRIVILEGES OF ANY LOCAL WEED INSPECTOR AS OUTLINED BY LAW. SIGNATURE IMAYOR OR CHAIR Of TOWNSHIP BOARVI TITLE DATE SIGNED Mayor STREET ADDRESS CITY AND STATE lIP CODE 1ub Road Shorewood MN MN AG-OOI87-02 .,5/1 al: g uS C woe( Oal:l-iX .- w - I- SZJ:Z :e~~0 ~O<U 00.000 ) .J ~ ~ ~ ... Z o ... ~ Ii: ~ "0 'Vi " .VI .. " > " .. C o VI C .2 ti ~ .. -.;; ~ tt\ .. o z z o 3 ::; 0.. 0.. < ~ K (.) to- Z Ll.I ~ " u II) o ro Q ! :s '<: "S lIS' $:I o ...t ~ ...t ~ 6 w ~ 0.. I- Z w ~ ~ 0.; ~ o LL. W ~ U .- LL. - ~ w U C Z < Z o - ~ u - ...a Q.. Q.. < ~ a;; tt\ ro,cU'\ g~U'\. :WI:,) ~ ta~ ~ ~ .. tI.l~'8 'Hoo 00 :w .... "". ~ ~U'\O ...tt"-.cl Q. LC'\ tI.l Cl ~ - 12 eX> eX> , ~ C\I , N Q. 12 o o Ci2 W 0.. o U'\ - t"- en ~o UZ ~u :c!:!::!. uo al:al: <0.. - tt\ 't:Itt\ >U'\ IO"U'\ ~~ '0 .' CD "" $:I ~0lE: ..... ...t .cl 10 .. 0" "" "" CD 0 <o...t tI.l~~ 0.....8 M~~ 5 ~ :2 u al: ~ < :> . o ~~ ..... .",,- ~Att\' 10 tt\ s:l<<SU'\ 0...tU'\ Os:l s::t ~"Q ~ 1I)""l2;~ lD .....::&: 0 10> :s lIS .."" 1ZI(1)'t:I~ 1~01l2 :w 0 $:I o :w 0 "" CD I:,) ~o"" 10"'0" lIS O.cl ~. ~\OtI.l... Cl ~ o CD' LJ ~ ~ 2 ~ i ~ 0 Uo. U t"- oo , t"- , N - v l! c o U " = = ~ C o -= v ell C C o v . c"O ._~ ~v o.s Qj. .0", c-:' ~a .c..... ",CJ "'- 101: ,CI -E C:s "u Eo 1;-0 0..< .. - .g< "..: "Og ftIJ::. EIn .l!!c c.g 0- ._ 10 -:s Be =-= a..c .t~ - w !;( o ~ I- Z o U 8 - ~~~~ '. I- Z w ~ ~ 0.; ~ o LL. Z. o - ~ U - ...a Q.. Q.. < CI) .... ~ S ~ I- Z o U I/) Z o B :) o w o I/) . Z tt\ 0\0 i=~ C - 0" < .oJ ~ ~ c..~O 060 ._" ~ "Ci'" ~ ~O .. I/) 8:~ al: 10 '" W ~.c o "c al: "C 0 o .. E w 0", o fo~ Z c'~ < 10" :c .c.. U U a.. .J 8 8 . - ~ N .. tt\ "C 00 ~ eX> e, 8:~ o5<' c " C\I o. 0 ~o '" :c - "C " .. > " 0.0 o.E o.~ < Z N .... ~~ m~!. ~ 1'%;. c( -:;)'2 >:18 ~. ! c( ~. Z '& z"'-'; ~i~1 8iffil i:J:B . ".. ..9 ~ ~J::.:s _-- __ 0 '" 0-5 - ~: ~ - " ] ~~~~ l.. ~lc iit 10100 _ a.. a..U c: .!!!o.!!! ~ o".c o v- ~e ..~c~ .10 "Uo.IO"C :l! ~~Q.c :- uwfl: :e Vo ...'11- :,g z~~ :).10 _ o-c ~i8 " ~~ t: ~~ . "~c ~~ .010 .!l! ~ CII CVI.J: 00- - CIIeo C'iji '" - ..- o"..c c..c 00 '" "C .;: ... " >- "EC .1010 vCo ;...<11,,# -Bfl ~:c .::~ .. .!!! g'Qj lit=uo. ~~~ UCC"C .g.8.8ij -~ '" CII- '" IO>C_ J::.ftIC11C c_..cE" ~C"'>-E .'" " c G!. >- C5lg..a. tiG!.E.2- l!..ftI",i c O=.l!!" 0- 10 10 .. .. uc-v6 ".2~:= _ .c.-1:ft1 _v,,,.c -.- "'U- Oo.c","O -a..CII-C ;;<Eoftl. .o",~'>': ":cv",,. -5 ;.B'o. i B.o. ti-fjO -"C 10.- " ~~'::~.c :_ CII c >- ;;~8C5E c v." - 0 'f~-5~': flO.cg"C ..~.~;> ~ o CII ~ ..'iji ~-5 fl.2 ~ :::~~o.... g= "C ti :l u,8C5l!iai "C"C~cE~ CII C 100 1;-"C ~ft1 cU o.~ '~g:o~"Cc CII'-"_C", "C.u>-ftI.- 5Eo..o"CC u .. E -0 cu.; Z " .2 ._:s.. .ccOftl~" ... _ v o.....c : ~ :~ :=a :"tI CII .c;: :'i: . CII : v :1: . ~ . 0 : e . 10 c:i~ IU c: u: 0 ~~ IU c: u.!!." ~b ~CII~ ;:)'5:2 Osu :::E-al: <~< . . . . . U"\ 0 ': .. ~ 0 . . . . .. . . " CO 0 : : ~..... ., '. ~ : i. 5 ~ "IU \0 13:1U 0 :~!< :=:u u'" \\0 .NO - .< :+1 c.=~'Z .:s : :~~ ~ ~. :IU 2~:;( CII~<'1 : "'.S 0 ~ 0" =-g 1/).2: t:; .~ "'- .. .oJ IU - ,., .... IU'" al: ~ :::E eII.....cc ......- .coZ.....~ a... .. :;) 1\7 IU 0 g a .!l! U'l t5 - n; '< E . I/) .2~ I/) <5 !< !': ~ ;> t5 !! .... + - ~ .Q ~. 0 ~ 3' .8 ~ ~ 0-'0 "C ftI""ftI0~~~"-~"" ' u fo ~,... .l!! c~RU'l_c.=U'l;::-O..1oD 0 ;,; ~cO 0 ClIO O"CI/)CllCCIoD...X" - CII ~ftI"'Oc o.lU"C cEl/)clUCllzl/)C E ~ !Z6:::E~0 ~+~ga~~~~~~~~~ t o>-;:)~o aO~~"OQ~;:) ~~~~ u .0 := ~. C .. _ c _ c f u 2! ~ 0 !Z f. 0 ~ . ~"C .. g .oJ fou 0 E ~ 0 E 0 E .S .S c.= ~ s: IU ... ""~' ; .~ 'Vi <1:<u~<~~~~~n;~"~~!ZUIU" "C~.l!! Zftl~ Oz 0 o,,_WCal:~1U C CII:sE G-5I-.oJu- \U IUal:~.oJ~~fal:Z:s~ ".00.. E _~z~-~ - ~~~""'I/) al: .....o~~o al: CII 0 0 t:;U'\. U'\. - O' 10 ;:) < CII ~ :; u ozu.- c.=.o .0 ~.... .oJ u= ..0'0 >- ..: M M.'; iii .D ....: cO 0\ ~ ~ z ~ CII CII' "'"C .c.cftlc ....<I/I1II#"'01'0 "C 0 CII ' c...",,^ -",- L- lOllS CII C r- ",..c .. CII c-llOE Z 0"0 .- CII .. 6 w ~ C 0.0 ~ 5t~]~ . ...... .0 CII ~ ~ 0 ~0-50'::~ ~ CIIO~C!: "'-.0;::- 0..- - ",,,,CIIUCC 'CII.c /AJ cc-CIIwu Wiio o.-.....c O 1: ,,-I- C:OCII=.cz . v CII- LI. "C ti.o ~ :)0 CII. CII -g CII w lG.o;::sv:::; L- .o.c .w c < r::: ,lo'CftI JtI '" - o"C CII ~'C <'';:: "o.c U CIllO - ECII..cE~- _ -,,100 LI. ::I cO c- _ VO-._C O._C",CII O-'-:"-E ti~ fo~ ~ !lSa.."Cgo. ,;:: 0. CII;> . ac 10 "i.u S CIIb.c-g ~C-CII CIIO~O"; .c.o .'- oW ftI~ ~c U .c CII v= CII _.c CII 10 . . I:;: ... .... - '" w ~ 00'- ....... c.c C".. fl'.- I:! CII 0 C .~ <..s ti 100." .I! 1!E-5"2c U 8 8o.tH3 ~ ~ ~ t;.- CII' < CftlCII~.c _'0.0._ _ . o s:l H Gi . o . ~ lD s:l o I:,) o u ~ ~' a ~ @I !u . c:i i . ~I o:r: i~ i~ ii 38 ... 31 !! it 18 .1 8_ I~ it i! 5(j... .. " 'll'\ ,~ ") ... ~ N ..~ ~ . ~m " .................. .;;; 0'\ 0'\ 0 QI NN", ~ ..................- cu tt'\ N N t- ,> ..~O.co. . ~ ffi~20 c cc:OC......z o ~ 0 0' III ::>zou c zO:::~ .2 - Q 0 ti 7.!<Cl.Cll: E Ou Cl. III ~;; tn g u.... ~ -cCl. u ~ ~ Cl. - a c 0 t';;. 'Ill: (j < ~ ~ u o o :s ~ ) tu u.r :c en Z o - ,t( :;:) z - .... ~Z o u " - .. ..~.. . .' DO C 'c ~ c 8 ..,: Z' IU ~ ~ a; Ill: o l.I.. ,:. a. Q. .. ?o- E III e. cu - .: -- .. cu = c .g= .. - 0 IoU XJ- '< .. cu u : l: 5 c C I- cu:! ffi.-S~ uis'!!' o.c " ..0 zliCcu.!! <- ! .. z 1;, III ~ o'~ ~ ,~' -c..CU 3.g :! 1 ::;~ ~ a 8:t: E l! < cu .. C fiu l 8 CJ "2 - C _~.8 0 c';;; 11I- ~e g ce o .- 6 ti 1; =- ~~] 8 ~8 ~ ~ - ~ ~ ... DC ....:1: UII'l'" -0 :I: z~ I :S",u <o- m.. . "'8"'0'0"'"'"'000"'00"'8'880 o ~",O'\NO'\N"'tt'\O'\~",Ot- tt'\ ~8.~~~~~~~d~~~d~~~d~ "' N"'~tt'\t-~tt'\"'t-~~ "'~O'\"'t- _~_~ tt'\-- __tt'\ __W~~ - 8S88888888888888888 ."'. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . oogooqooooooo~~~oo~ o N-C:S 0 .... ........... .... ... O. at g 8 8 g 8 8 8 8 88 8 8 8 80 ~ ~8 g.~ I~, ... ~ -... ~ ... \,) e~w~ 8 8 8 8 88 8 88 8 8 8 8 8 8 8.88 8 ~oJ~tca~ ~ 8. ~o ~ ~~~o ~ ~ ~o d ~dd~. ~ O~Q.1I'l ~ t- ~ t- ~ tt'\ N 0'\ 8 tt'\ "' t- ~ ~ N 0 "~aO+ - U'\ 0 tt'\~ ~ <0 ~ ~ 0'\ W 0'\ <0 "' o z .. e tt'\ N N tt'\ - 1.0 tt'\ N - tt'\ N \0 N t- 0'\ tt'\ u< -- N - - ~~az'" 8 8. 8'8888888888888888 ~%~;;: d d d d d d d d 0 d d d d d 0 d 0 d d' .... wl};ooO ""~"'''zo DCCI).... Q. a' o ii w, a ~ elf.! ~i!: ~ -0 ulI'l :oc =>z Ill: ~o a i ~3: Cl._a ~t- ~<. ... 53 oJ.... =>3 u 53~ ~ ' :oc DC i ... o CD z o Ii: 8. :a a < ~d _z 8888888888888888888 '. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . o "' 0 "' 0 "' 0 "' 0 0 N tt'\ 0 0 "' o. 0 N ~ ' t- tt'\ ~ N ~"'t- ~~t-oo N _ ~ t- ~ tt'\ ~Nt-", , N ~, _N'O'\-~ , ' ~ 88888888888888888g8~ . . . . . . . . . . . . .' . . . . . -> ;~tt'\"'<O~~8g~~88008g~~ _t-fC\~~c:s~-1.OC:S0'\0'\", ",",Nc:sB tt'\_NO_Ott'\N _NN", wt-O'\~ _, _ N ~ 6 8,888888888888888888 rn . _. . . . . . . . . .,. . . . . . . · 0 _~tt'\ow",0'\",08wtt'\0",000~1.O~ ~ "'~t-~tt'\NO'\ tt'\"'~-t-~N o~ _ ~on~~<o~ ~O'\ NNO'\W ",H tt'\ tt'\tt'\-~tt'\N _tt'\N _~tt'\t-O'\~ ~:.'" N .... ....~ = to 0 . 8~ lD C:l ~~ = 0 i lD ~,~o; .: ~H ~ r-t ~ lDtO :xl as A e~~~ ~.~ ......... eN ~ . :+>>~r-t~ ~.g.8as. :f. -e O1R~aSR s:I '" ettl e ~ e '" ~ .... lD .... r-t , .q ~'\Z.1 o A ,r-t~~~~8~~r-t . gr-tOA ~~~efl~rn~8'"lg' :f~~g~~ ~i8~.ao,Q:~~' REI :a~.e:.-;::+>>\Z.1 ~ :5 .; ~ g 'i:l,:E t ~.~ -a ~ e 8. ~ .si ~ ~ ~t!J ~ ~ ... ... ~ ~ e 0 ~ lD ~ S ,.,.r-t J.i.;.t 0 e 0 11' r9iiii .Q ~ ,g !::' !1.! s:! .! r:! .~:r! as ~ e:3 fl :; 0200~802880@02~8~~2- 1~~~;_~~~~~2~~~~~~~~~ o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o-t> 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - 0'\ IZI J J ..'. ~ ~ . ...: ~" ", .. . ,~ U"\ Ioo:t' I . lCX) -- 'tt\ ~ .g . ,0 0'\ ~ "' ~ 8 .....f;l i 8 . 0'\ ~ tt'\ ~ - 8 . o 8 . W .0'\ ~ N tt'\ il ~u ~i Ii Ii . i~ 0' I. II 'I Ja 81 II i! 8 . - fa tt'\ 0'\' 8 . 0'\ "' to - tt'\ - . rn ~ ~ . ! . . 171e Bank ~@Eden Prairie February 26, 1988 Mayor Robert Rascop City of Shorewood 5755 Country Club Rd. Shorewood, Mn. 55331 Dear Mayor Rascop: It is time for us to organize the 8th Annual Easy Race. year the race is planned for Sunday, April 24. This The 1988 field will be limited to 650 runners. As in past years, fees will be div1ded among the "Save the Lake Fund" and the "Crime Prevention Funds" (or their equivalents) of the various police departments assisting in the execution of the race. The route through your community will remain exactly the same as past years. Would you please obtain your Council's approval, and let me know, at your convenience, their response. Your help is greatly appreciated. Sincerely, / /,./ .. I":> /J /' ~.-:~ _I ~~--I.-- Kenneth D. Brooks Assistant Vice President Manager Eden Prairie Office KDBJjmo vVagner Way. Eeten Prairie, Minnesota 5S344. 612-934-5201=i An offIce of The Bank ExcelSior .sC- I . . CITY OF SHOREWOOD MAYOR Robert Rascop COUNCI L Jan Haugen K risti Stover Rpbert Gagne Barb Brancel ADMINISTRA TOR Daniel J. Vogt 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD . SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 · (612) 474-3236 MEMORANDUM TO: PLANNING COMMISSION. MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: BRAD NIELSEN DATE: 26 FEBRUARY 1988 RE: LUNDGREN BROS. CONSTRUCTION - SIMPLE SUBDIVISION/COMBINATION FILE NO.: 405 (88.05) Lundgren Bros. Construction proposes to rearrange the lot lines between the lot located at 19595 Near Mountain Boulevard and the lots at 6000 and 6010 McKinley Place (see Site Location map - Exhibit A. attached). Their reasons for doing so are stated in the attached letter (Exhibit B). The proposed division/combination is shown on Exhibit C. All lots will still comply with the size and setback requirements of the Near Mountain P.U.D. The enlargement of the vacant lot is viewed as desireable. The two model homes at 6000 and 6010 McKinley Place will still comply with setback requirements. It is recommended that the division/combination be approved subject to the following: 1. The applicant must provide up-to-date (within 30 days) title opinions for review by the City Attorney. 2. New drainage and utility easements must be provided to replace the ones which will be vacated. 3. The applicant must provide the items listed in 1 and 2 above within 30 days of the Council's approval of their request. 4. Once they have the resolution they must record it within 30 days. cc: Dan Vogt Glenn Froberg Jim Norton Mike Pflaum A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore 2 . . ~' . Cll >> Q) ~ - I D D D 5l~.c .s::.ClliiiU _.s::. e ClleU ~c~3 Cll~~ ~OCll >0->> =.s::.~ Qi-e.c ''-:: Vl U ~ eQ ;:- :)- ....O(6:J c:: c:: c:: -0 UOe .iij _ .c ...... e Z Cll U,> e Cll 'iij 'S 'iij C~ >......("') Cll . C1l E'ij51.o - -e -0lC\J ro.c c:: c:: ID("')...... ~a.Cll '.c C1l = :I :I ::I \II~ ro l{') , 5:)a.~ 0 0 0 1Ol{')~ Cll- > :e :e :e e Cll Cll - Vl C1l e NZ'<t -e.s::. t5(/)~O ... ... ... ~~N ~;.= >- :).- 0.- III III III UCllCll .:= ~ c .~ ell ell ell ~ ell to -.s::.E Vl - > Z Z z iii~ . eeVl'ij - - - Ci5C6~ l1> ,- .s::. Vl O-~.c III III III ro N <l> ~-g~C ()VlCll:) ell ell ell UJ >- c:: </icE:;: '" u u l{')~2 C1l-~Cll e=u'- :2c: .!!g III c: > ~ E COQ5 c::: . a: ~ 0.. 0,- Vl:) a:o 0.. ._ 0 jJ"O_~ eVlCllcVl .,.;: t-~ t-E Clll1>c(ij ~ 0 l!? 'Uj ~ :1'- uCllc c:'1:J -'1:J c:g C Vl E,- 01- Cll ell Ui~ .5c ~-eII'" U-UVlC '-c .2~Vl~ 3~'S,g~ ,!.c ~~ lIl:l! (.)0) :EN ~C") Cl)E~o 'C: .c 01 c~/ '" .. \p 0- -i! - \ \ "' N '" '" <t N ,.., N i --~--........--....... ': 3':J~':J "\ I---'~"'.!....'lvl>ij~ '.' / ., .:;' ~- / '!? N N ,.., " / '-"/J.... , Ilk: 1:> " 10 ,"; \0 .a> .~ , '0 N / I (, ~ \~ :' ~. N v.. ~ '" o .... !: I>.... ..( ~ ~'" "~;'. ~J ~ '~"~---'~?4'/ '" ;~~ '- ,-~ > '" >, "", :<~~~ '-..... ~-r'\: "~J'" CD :. ..; 19 ~ '-..,," a> Q = \. ~~ /' \ \. -~. , Exhibi t A SITE LOCATION Lundgren Bros.-Simple Subd./Combination t · lUnD<iREn · B..ROSCONSTRUCTION . INC. 935 EAST WAY2ATA BOULEVARD. WAYZATA. MINNESOTA 55391 . (612) 473-1231 tebrUdlY .. 19tH:> Mr. braa N~el.sen Shorewood Commun~ty Dev~lopment J~rector ~755 Country Club koad Shorewood, Minnesota 5~331 Re: Lot 2, Block 2, Chestnut R~dge at Near Mounta~n 9th Add1t10n vear brad: The Chestnut Ridge 9th Addit~on plat over-ant1c1pated grade change problems on the south s1ce of Near Mountain Boulevard between Chestnut Court and McKinley Place. As a now read1ly observable consequence, two ot the three homes to be constructed on these lots will be illogically close together (the homes on Lots 2 and 3, Block 21, wh11e the th1rd, the model on Lot 1, has an abnormally deep rear yard. we propose to remedy th~s si~uation by means ot a lot d1v1s1on/ consolidat1on involv~ng Lots 1 and 2, Bloc~ 2, Chestnut Ridge at Near Mountain 9th Addition and Lot 16, BlocK 1, McK1nley Place at Near Mounta1n 2nd Addit1on. A portion of Lot 1 and of Lot l6 would be added to Lot 2, as is depicted on the attached. All three of the lots are owned by Lundgren Bros. I understand from an earl1er conversation that the application fee for a lot division/consolidation is $250.00. Is there an add~tional charge for the vacation of utility and dra1nage easements? Can this vacation be processed concurrently with the division/consolidation? What are the notice requirements for neighboring landowners? I anticipate that you will need a survey of the proposed div1sion/ consolidation, legal descriptions of the parcels being created, legal descriptions of the drainage and utility easements which will be substituted for those being vacated, an ownership list from Hennepin County, and submission of the requ1red fees. Is there anything else? Very truly yours, Lundgren Bros. Construct~on, Inc. ; )/1;" /Jf\ ~~chae~ A. ~laum MAP/md Exhibit B APPLICANT'S REQUEST LETTER Dated 1 February 1988 '" ..., . ; .~ ~ . . \ '''> ~ ~ / /' / \ ~o " ~ ~~ .,0 i \ <(<' -) ~ "t. ~ ~ \ \ \ ,0. \ \ \ ") ~~ .;:;;~ ~ ,-~ <.,. , , '" " ,,' ,'<:. '" L " , - t\J' "'...-.& ... , ,""....... t;>-' ,(, , ' ........ , \, ~'" , , ' ')- ...,,-) t'- ^ , ~",,' , , ... (.... ... C'..) l';>-v \ "'0 r" 'P' (") rn ,. " " ' , 'J ,( ~ ,--. ,;, '\ <'.< - ~ ' /-';] \ \ \ ~( 0.... t)o.' {, \ , '-' "'...... , ,<''v '<:.-.. ,,.. ... v ---- ,( t\;>-' -<,(. j Exhibit C PROPOSED DIVISION/COMBINATION "'.- . (\\\t =& Associates, Inc. 202\ East Hennepin Avenue Minneapolis, MN 55413 612-331-8660 FAX 331-3806 . Engineers Surveyors Planners March 4, 1988 City of Shorewood 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, Minnesota 55331 RE: Review of Final Plat, Plans and Specifications For Sweetwater at Near Mountain, 2nd Addition Shorewood, Minnesota OSM Comm. No. 1744.23 Dear City Officials: We have reviewed the plans and specifications for the Sweetwater at Near Mountain, 2nd Addition as prepared by Sathre-Bergquist, Inc. Our review comments will address the following items: Construction plans and specifications for site grading, sanitary sewer, watermain, storm drain, and streets. Final plat. I. CONSTRUCTION PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The sanitary sewer, watermain, street designs and specifications conform to City Standards. The storm drain conforms to City Standards except on the 18 inch outlet from storm MH #3 on the east side of Sweetwater Curve opposite Lot 4 of Block 2. The plans show an outlet at an elevation of 900.00 On the grading plan, the indicated wetland water level' is at approximately the 898 elevation. Any outlet into this wetland should be at the 898 elevation. To confrom to this standard would involve the extension of the proposed pipe to this elevation. Coordination with these elevations should also be reviewed and approved by the watershed district. A.. tJ .... ... . . Page Two City of Shorewood Re: Sweetwater at Near Mountain, 2nd Addition March 4, 1988 II. FINAL PLAT Generally, the final plat as submitted is acceptable. However, there are four items that do need to be addressed. 1. The previously mentioned storm drain requires a drainage and/or utility easement. If one currently exists in this wetland area encompassing this outlet, it should be shown as such. This provokes another discrepancy. A grading plan submitted with a let- ter dated November 9, 1987 shows a pond east of Sweetwater Curve with an outlet elevation of 898.5 and a bottom of 894.5. If this pond exists, it should be shown as a drainage easement and the storm drain should be extended to this pond or to the 898 elevation. 2. The grading plan submitted with the construction plans (dated February 16, 1988) shows Block 1 and 2 opposite from that shown on the plat. Another discrepancy between this grading plan and the plat is shown as Lot 9 of Block 2 on the plat, and Lot 1 of Block 1 of a future addition on the grading plans. 3. The grading plan shows this future addition. However, the submitted plat and grading permit cover only the Sw~etwater at Near Mountain, 2nd Addition. If this future addition is to also be graded as part of the 2nd Addition, it should be platted and permitted accordingly. 4. The construction plans on Sheet 3 of 6 show the utilities being stubbed out to the east at approximately Station 11+00. If the utilities are to be stubbed out past the platted right-of-way, an easement or right-of- way is required on the plat. We will be happy to discuss these revi ew comemnts wi th you. If you have any questions, please call me. Respectfully, ORR-SCHELEN-MAYERON & ASSOCIATES, INC. ce~ e.*/mLJ City Engineer JPN:mlj RESOWfIrn ID. A RESOUT.l'Irn APPOO\TI~ '!HE FINAL PlAT OF SWEJnWATER AT NEAR MJ.NrAIN 2nd addi t ion \\HEREAS, the final plat of Sweetwater at Near M>untain 2nd Addition has been subni tted in the manner required for the platting of land under Shorewood Ci ty Code and under Olapter 462 of Minnesota Statutes, and all proceedings have been duly had thereunder; and \\HEREAS, said plat is consistent with the Shorewood O:IIprehensive Plan and the regulat ions and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and Ci ty Code of the Ci ty of Shorewood. N:IV, 'lHEREKEE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City (buncil of the City of Shorewood as follows: 1. That the plat of Sweetwater at Near M>untain 2nd Addi tion is hereby approved. 2. That said approval is specifically conditioned upon the terms and condi tions contained in the Developnent Agreement for Sweetwater at Near M>untain 2nd Addi tion, attached hereto and made a part hereof. 3. That the Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized to execute the Certificate of Approval and Developnent Agreement on behalf of the Ci ty (bunc i I . 4. That this final plat shall be filed and recorded within thirty (30) days of the date of this resolution. BE IT RmHER RESOLVED, that such execution of the Certi ficate upon said plat by the Mayor and Ci ty Clerk shall be conclusive showing a proper cmpliance therewith by the subdivider and City officials and shall ent i t Ie such plat.. to be placed on record forthwi th wi thout further fonmality, all in cmpliance with Minnesota Statutes and Ordinances of the Ci ty . AlDPrED BY '!HE CI'lY ancIL of the City of Shorewood this _ day of , 1988. Robert Rascop, Mayor ATrEST: Sandra L. Kennelly, City Clerk 3/11/88 CI'IY OF SIIEE\\ttD I>E\1El.DR\mI' .AGmR\ENl' ~EElWATER AT NEAR MDm\IN 2nd AIDITICN nlIs MEBEVENl\ made this day of , 1988, by and between the CI'IY OF SIIEE\\ttD, a Minnesota lII.D1icipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as the "Ci ty" and LtNXJmN BIVS. ~ICN IN::., hereinafter referred to as the "Developer". \\HERBAS, Developer has previously entered into a Developnent Agreement with the City dated July 28, 1986, for the development known as Near I.Vbuntain; and \\HERBAS, Developer has previously filed with the City the first, second, third, and fourth final plats for said developnent; and \\HERBAS, Developer now desires to file the fifth final plat for said developnent, which is the plat of Sweetwater at Near M>untain 2nd Addition, which is a replat of the lot orignally platted as Sweetwater at Near M>untain, and which replat is attached hereto and made a part hereof as Exhibi t A. MlV, nmRBRJm, in consideration of the foregoing prEmises and acceptance by the Ci ty of the final plat of Sweetwater at Near M>untain 2nd Addition, the City and Developer agree as follows: 1. The Developer shall subnit an Agreement Providing Alternative Security for SUbdivision Improvements for the property platted as Sweetwater at Near l\buntain 2nd Addi tion, for review and approval by the City prior to recording of the plat. 2. Developer shall provide a copy of its proposed DecI arat ion of Covenants, Conditions, Restrictions, and Reservations, for Sweetwater at Near M>untain 2nd Addition, for review and approval by the City prior to recording of the plat. Said Declaration shall be recorded contm:poraneously wi th the plat and proof of filing thereof furnished to the City. 3. Developer acknowledges that as a newly platted developnent, additional sums will be assessed against the property as equalization charges pursuant to Shorewood City Code. Developer and the Ci ty agree that all such charges are to be added to the balance remaining on the original assessments and spread over the subject property. Installments shall be paid annually for the remainder of the tenn of the original assessments, together with interest on the balance remaining, at the rate of six and one-half percent (6.5%) per annun. A schedule of such charges is set forth in Exhibit B, attached hereto and made a part hereof. 4. All other applicable provisions of the Near M>lmtain Developnent Agreement executed by the parties on July 28, 1986, are hereby made a part of this Agreement and are fully incorporated herein by reference. IN WI1NESS \\HmUDF, the part ies hereto have caused these presents to be executed on the day and year first above wri tten. I1NXJmN BlO3. <XNS'l1UJCl'ICN I~. CI'IY OF SKm.VOD By: By: Its: Its: Mayor A'ITEST: City Clerk STA'IE OF MINNESOrA ) ) ss CXl.NlY OF mmEPIN ) ()} this day of , 1988, before me, a Notary Public wi thin and for said Chunty, personally appeared Robert Rascop and Sandra L. Kennelly, to me personally known, who, being each by me duly sworn, did say that they are respectively the Mayor and Ci ~y Clerk of the mmicipal corporation named in the foregoing instrunent, and that said instrunent was signed and sealed in behalf of said corporation by authori ty of its Ci ty Chunci I, and said Robert Rascop and Sandra L. Kennelly acknowledged said instrunent to be the free act and deed of said corporation. Notary Publ i c STA'IE OF MINNESOrA ) ) ss CllNlY OF HENNEPIN ) ()} this day of , 1988, before me, within and for said Chunty personally appeared and to me personally known, who, being each by me duly sworn did say that they are respectively the and of the corporation nmned in the foregoing instrunent, and that the seal affixed to said instrunent is the corporate seal of said corporation, and that said instrunent was signed and sealed in behalf of said corporation by authority of its Board of Directors and acknowledged said instrunent to be the free act and deed of said corporation. Notary Publ ic ~ AT NEAR MlNrAIN 2nd AIDITICN Sewer Equalization Olarges: Lots 17 @ $ 848.00 'ltID\L lQJALI ZATICN ClJARE Frn PLAT $ 14,416.00 EXHIBIT B , "l :" i I I :;..: f.1 ,j \ ;" in "i; .' " :i I: j! H .' ;! " ~nUI. J1 .,! Ie. . it ( '. apf .~i Ii' Ii J'I i" I ~Ji st I ! lis ii 1 ,.~"E : :i ::,,1; :I ~H it ~ ";; .. ~;~i it ~1!! I ~l H; tll! i!! ~ 1"_ r r ii~ r. ;il "~--_.,...... .... .....,:~/.r,....-....... ; -~.,~:.." '~." ...:.y.... ,':r:r" (j) ~ M M -I ~ ~ 1\.)-1 ZM 0;0 ~~ 0-1 o -Z -1("11 O~ z;o . f. ~: B: o c Z -I ~ Z " ~ z - < J- Z ::> o ~ O::Z <0 w- ze 1-0 <0 < 0::0 wz J-N < ~ I- W W ~ CI) w .. " ~ ~ z ~ . ~ ::. ~ o ~~ ~; "z ~J: a O~ " = E~~ " "iI J'" ~~9E~ e~ ... JltN ~a :~c: ....1 0::- Z w<c aVO ~; ~gS z~ ~ID~ t~ ...od ~~ i; i:- ....!f 6..C ~e ~~~ ~" :9i ~:: ~~.G: w~~:z:w. ......J~ ~,,~ i~~=5~ u Z lOD zZz ~". "o;~ o~ ~;: "f:!;.,. %~W ...wz ow- i"": z2w ;:~~ :"11'" 2i~; ~~~! "'00% ...1...... ~ ~ l1 ; '" ;. '" ~ ::: ~ ~ ~2 .~ ;~ 0 ~~ 0 ~ z w ~ Z o . z g 1-- ....1: .. W 0- : t; w ~ ",' 0- ~ 0- " OZ ~~ fg J:r ,... .J", 1&1: Zo- \'" ..~ ~" 1l~ ~~1l -- ~ E 1; w o ; :;< s: ""o~ ~ f'V'~ '1:,;~t/y.,. .y,.....4' f' v~~ ..~ .... '(''"'~ ~,.~ ~ 4',,\ " ''') . " V " " . ,,: ' .l' ~/ U) t&i w :x: U) C') u. o N .... W w :x: U) ,,1. Lu ~ ~ -.J e" "'w ,,0- .." .' wz .u :i t= :r= ~i w!! ~~ "w "x w~ > ". ;: .... 0-. z!z 2)00.0 i~i w:.cw "." ...,... U II! ,: . a:: <..:: :> " .. lit .. . LrJ -/ .... II X ... . . ~.".. :..... '. ... . . - , " ., . .. ~ .. ~ ~ ~ .. C .. ~ ~ ~ T ~ "2 :i "'~ Cz !. =~ ".. "z ~ -~~~ ~\".. ~; ~ ~ ~ 0... X : :i: ~ ! =!.,i ::;: ~ ~~! :I g~J W ~ :2: ; ! ~~~. ~. ~ ~i~S ~i ~ ~j~~:~ _ 0 i;~; ~-~ 0 ," , it , S :56-30'00. w ----. -., 159 .,-.. f r----- /--' : I V../. 1 "', 1 IV~) ~ " I I, (., '1' g~ I v" ~i 1 ~~ I en; I z - <( t- z ::> . SI-.S'OO. II '1~ _ ...... _ . '.!!-_- o ~f-.' .. r .... ::t. J ::. IL n g../. 1;' Z o~ ~... LLI 1Il I!_ ~ ~~:;; r:~ ...... 0 ...J:::~ I'" <( G:: I S ~5t. ,,~'OO. w u. 174 27... 10 ~Jt/7) 0::0 wZ t-N <( ~ I- W W ~ (/) IE! ~i ~ .. ~ . ~ l!l%i H ~~I ~ ~ : ! ... "' " C :;t s: << w . =i :: I C t; B-. ~n o ~ ~ -: = 1f2: : i ~ 0 II _ wg ~.i 5~ ~o2 . w .. & > .... .. i~ ~.! ,i ~n ~ * ",..Ii ~~ IU Mi:j ~ :1 = ~ i C z f1) ... LLI W :r; f1) CO') II. o CO') Iii w :z:: f1) (j ", , v..J, ...., 1/ ~~ -1 )/ S .. a % .. C . ir..... : - " ... . MEMORANDUM . . CITY OF SHOREWOOD MAYOR Robert Rascop COUNCI L Jan Haugen Kristi Stover Robert Gagne Barb Brancel ADMINISTRATOR Daniel J. Vogt 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD . SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 · (612) 474-3236r TO: PLANNING COMMISSION. MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: BRAD NIELSEN DATE: 24 FEBRUARY 1988 RE: WILD DUCK 3RD ADDITION - PROPOSED REZONING FILE NO.: 405 (88.06) BACKGROUND Having purchased several lots in the Wild Duck 3rd Addition (see Site Location map - Exhibit A. attached). B-T Ventures discovered that the lot sizes which exist in that development are more reflective of R-2B zoning than they are of the current R-2A zoning of the property. Since all of the lots have been built upon. this would not normally present a major problem. However. B-T's intention is to subdivide their lots for purposes of individual ownership of the two-family units. In order to do so. each lot must have 15.000 square feet of lot area per unit under the R-2A zoning classification. The R-2B zoning would allow 10.000 square feet of area per unit. At B-T's request the City Council. at their 8 February meeting. agreed that the City would process the rezoning on the City's own initiative. ANALYSIS/RECOMMENDATION Prior to 1985 the property in question was zoned R-4. Multiple-Family Residential. Since it was already being developed as two-family residential. it was placed in the R-2 category when the new Zoning Ordinance was adopted. At that time lot sizes in the Wild Duck 3rd Addition were mistakenly thought to be 30.000 square feet in area. As it turns out. most of the 13 lots are just slightly over 20.000 square feet. A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore Ie . lle I Wild Duck 3rd Addition Proposed Rezoning 24 February 1988 . Any change in zoning should be based upon the City's Comprehensive Plan. Rezoning of the subject property conforms with Shorewood' s Plan in two significant respects. First. a major policy of the Plan was to make zoning consistent with existing land use. Secondly. the Plan encourages individual ownership of residential units. While the rezoning is recommended as more or less a "housekeeping matter". there may be residents who fear any form of rezoning. In response to those fears it is important to remember that the property owner intends to sell the units to individual owners. Perhaps more importantly. since all the lots have been developed. the density will not be increased. A proposed text amendment is attached which would change the zoning of the property from R-2A to R-2B. If you have questions or would like additional information relative to this matter. please do not hesitate to contact my office prior to the Planning Commission meeting on 1 March or the Council meeting on 14 March. BJN:ph cc: Dan Vogt Glenn Froberg Jim Norton Rick Murray - 2 - 1'..~7;ft.." ."...,. --"T-'" . [ ~ I \ &:.0 './.1. (~ ._~ j .>> ~ ~ "'....,. ;; N N ~ ~ ....'J@ 7~, . "'/1 t\I I " S5'~ , .- 7'~1S ~ '" I L -t~- I, ..t.O' - '.' ,.~-,~ I - ~ - , , I I j _ _~..l__~__ ---- ,? ---.:::-{+'5 B. ~-: iOd r~----~----- .l.~ - - r I ~ ./ i __ I : n @I ~ i~ - - ",S'~'l'OS'Z Exhibit A SITE LOCATION Wild Duck 3rd . P oposed Rezoning Addit~on- r . .. . . ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 1201.09 OF THE SHOREWOOD CITY CODE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD. MINNESOTA. ORDAINS: Section 1. City Code Section 1201.09 Subd. 2. Map. is hereby amended as follows: The "Zoning Map of Shorewood" on file with the Zoning Administrator is hereby amended by removing from the R-2A. Single and Two-Family Residential District and including within theR-2B. Single and Two-Family Residential District. the property described as follows: "Lots 1 - 13 and Outlot C. Block 1. Wild Duck 3rd Addition." Section 2. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Shorewood. Minnesota. this ____ day of . 1988. Robert Rascop. Mayor ATTEST Sandra L. Kennelly City Clerk Exhibit B PROPOSED TEXT AMENDMENT . . . CITY OF SHOREWOOD MAYOR Robert Rascop COUNCI L Jan Haugen Kristi Stover Robert Gagne 'Barb Brancel ADMINISTRATOR Daniel J. Vogt 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD . SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 . (612) 474-3236 MEMORANDUM TO: PLANNING COMMISSION, MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: BRAD NIELSEN DATE: 25 FEBRUARY 1988 RE: MIESEN, ROBERT - SETBACK VARIANCE AND VARIANCE TO EXPAND A NONCONFORMING STRUCTURE FILE NO.: 405 (87.54) BACKGROUND Mr. Robert Miesen proposes to add a second story and an attached two-car garage to his existing home, located at 5570 Shore Road (see Site Location map - Exhibit A, attached). Since the house does not meet current setback requirements from the lake or the stree~ a variance is necessary to add the second story which will increase the nonconformity of the structure. As can be seen on Exhibit B, the proposed garage requires setback variances from the street as well as from the lake. A four and a half-foot deck along the south side of the house also requires a setback variance. And finally, a 22' x 26' deck proposed to be placed on the south side of the garage will further encroach on the lakeshore setback. The applicant's request is further explained in his letter, attached as Exhibit C. The subject property is zoned "R-1C", Single-family residential and is also subject to the requirements of the "S", Shoreland District. As shown in the attached exhibits the site is sandwiched between Christmas Lake on the south and a pond to the north. Complicating matters more, it is divided in two by Shore Road, a 20-foot public street. The property contains a total area of 14,833 square feet. 10,816 square feet of which is located between the lake and the road and 4017 square feet of which is located between the road and the pond. The existing house currently contains approximately 1400 square feet of area. The addition will double that area. There is also a cellar area beneath half of the house which serves as a mechanical room. The cellar is only accessible from outside the house. A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore /1 . . Miesen. Robert-Setback variance 25 February 1988 The proposed garage contains 484 square feet of area. The existing garage' contains 660 square feet of area. The proposed deck along the rear of the house contains 196 square feet of area and the deck behind the garage contains 572 square feet of area. Plans for the proposed addition are shown on Exhibits D - F. ISSUES AND ANALYSIS Section 1201.03 Subd. lk. of the Shorewood Zoning Ordinance provides for the expansion of nonconforming single-family units subject to a number of conditions. the primary one of which is that the expansion does not increase the nonconformity. Since both the second story and the garage increase the nonconformity. a variance is necessary. Section 1201.05 Subd. 2 contains criteria for evaluating variance requests. Recent litigation in which the City is involved has emphasized the importance of addressing all of the criteria mentioned in the Ordinance. It is important to remember that the request must satisfy all of the criteria. If it fails to meet even one of the criteria. the request should be denied. Following is how the applicant's request complies with the Ordinance criteria: "b. (1) Special conditions and circumstances exist which are peculiar to the land. structure. or building involved and which are not applicable to other lands. structures. or buildings in the same district: (a) Special conditions may include exceptional topo~raphic or water conditions or. in the case of an existing lot or parcel of record. narrowness. shallowness or shape of the property. " Being located between a lake and a pond and being split by a road. the applicant's property satisfies this criteria. "(b) Special conditions and circumstances may not be primarily economic in nature." Since there is no direction in which the house can be expanded. economics does not appear to be the reason for the variance request. "(2) Literal interpretation of the provisions of this Ordinance would deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by properties in the same district under the terms of this Ordinance." Relative to the garage variance. the City has gone on record stating that single-family dwellings should have at least a two-car garage in Minnesota. Based upon the applicant's letter. it is assumed that the existing carport will be demolished. If this was not intended. the City should require its removal. - 2 - . . Re: Miesen. Robert-Setback variance 25 February 1988 Expansion of the house itself poses more of a question under this provision. Fourteen hundred square feet of floor area can not be considered to be small in terms of floor area. However. there may be two factors which s.hed light on this issue. First. one of the criteria for expansion of nonconforming structures is that the ratio between total floor area and lot area not exceed 30 percent. Assuming removal of the carport. the proposed floor area to lot area ratio is 27 percent. Secondly. it may be helpful to look ~t the size of houses located on similarly sized lots in Shorewood. Perhaps the best example would be the Covington Vine Ridge P.D.D. Lot sizes there average between 15.000 and 18.000 square feet. with several lots as small as 10.000 square feet. The typical new home has approximately 1000 to 1200 square feet of floor area. Most of them have two levels. Sections 1201. 03 Subd. 3d. and 1201. 26Subd. 5a. of the Zoning Ordinance address not only the decks. but also a significant portion of the house. The Ordinance states that where adjoining structures are located closer to the lake or to the street. the average setback of those structures may establish the setback for the structure between them. "(3) The special conditions and circumstances do. not result from the actions of the applicant. II While the actual age of the structure is unknown at this time. it appears to be older than 30 years and likely was built prior to any of Shorewood's setback requirements. The applicant has not done anything which has resulted in the existing nonconformity. Nor is he proposing anything beyond normal residential use of the property (for example. he is not requesting a large garage to accommodate a large motor home). "(4) Grantin~ the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by this Ordinance to other lands. structures. or buildings in the same district. " This request is similar to the variance granted to Robert Bergstrand on Edgewood Road. Closer to the subject site there are homes similar in size to the one proposed by the applicant. most specifically the home immediately east. If granted. it must be realized that this variance will further establish precedence for future requests. Those which meet the same criteria as the applicant's should be treated similarly. Section 1201.05 Subd. 2c. requires that a variance be granted in order to make "reasonable use" of the property and that the variance be the minimum variance necessary. What distinguishes this request from many is that there is no place to add on to the existing structure. This is illustrated by the fact that the lakeshore and front yard setbacks overlap (see Exhibit B). - 3 - . . Re: Miesen, Robert-Setback variance 25 February 1988 RECOMMENDATION Section 1201.05 Subd. 2a. requires findings of fact which address five items. Granting of the variance should not: "(I) Impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property." Since there are no structures to the north or south of the house, front and lakeshore setbacks do not affect homes in those directions. The proposed variances still maintain the minimum side yard setbacks (30 feet total, 10 feet minimum). .. (2) Unreasonably increase the con9;es tion in the public street." Given that the house already exists, the number of homes served by the street, and the fact that the variance does not increase the number of units, traffic is not considered an issue. "(3) Increase the dan9;er of fire or endan9;er the public safety." This request is not considered to increase the danger of fire or endanger public safety. "(4) Unreasonably diminish or impair established property values within the neighborhood. or in any other way be contrary to the intent of this Ordinance." While the existing structure is not in bad physical condition, the proposed addition and renovation should enhance the neighborhood in which it is located. .. (5) Violate the intent and purpose of the City Comprehensive Plan." Development and improvement of single-family residential homes are considered to be consistent with the Shorewood Comprehensive Plan. BJN:ph cc: Dan Vogt Glenn Froberg Jim Nort on Robert and Karen Miesen - 4 ;... ~ ~ .. -' .... (f" "CD . t' - ~ ~ . 'lIl ..,J ~'" 0' ... ,NOS~313d ., 'J " In 'S 1~380~ [it i/./ .~ ' 0 I .~ Z I ~ U 0 0 '" I. . U.., , , I ... II) I~ cirD ~ "'Cl' 4.... 't- ~- ..... -- '" \J) ~ ~ \I ~ \ OJ I~ i 1 00 'It N '. i\ c"_. r- ...... 4 N../ \P ~ /W :' :E' , '0 ~ :::J.. d -1 Ii '~ I ~~ " <S ~ ""$ .- ~ ...t:. \J ~ \ Cl "" --- .... ~ ~ ... , '$ ~ . \ \ \ " I I I , ' , \ Exhibit A SITE LOCATION Miesen variance request CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY Prepared for: LEGA~AESCRIPTION : Lot 4 and Lot 4A, RADISSON INN ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County,. Minnesota. Robert A. Miesen '. '/0 ~O. ,\ I I " " S:c . C}.;f:i/s 7"414S L..41(~ "- "- " "- " GENERAL NOTES o Denotes iron monument ....... -.. Denotes cross chiseled in concrete lC 939.7 Denotes existing spot elevation 19391 Denotes proposed spot elevation ( Denotes surface drainage Dashed contour lines denotes proposed features Sol i d co!,\tour lines denotes existing features Proposed top of foundation elevation = Proposed basement floor elevation = Proposed garage floor elevation = BENCHMARK~ -" t; 12 ! >- o ~ I!! 2340 Daniels Street Long Lake, Minnesota 55356 Ph: 475-1433 I hereby certify that this survey, plGn or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Regiltered Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. ~A 7J.dutu SCALE \ "= 30' N on R z ALL-METRO LAND SURVEYORS BOOK PAGE .... 1ft DATE 12'" 2.1" 81 REG. NO. J10Z~ Exhibit B SITE SURVEY . . 1355 Estate Lane Lake Forest, Illinois 60045 December 31, 1987 City of Shorewood Attn: Mr. Brad Nielsen 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, Minnesota 55331 Dear Mr. Nielsen:' We are in the immediate process of moving from Illinois back to Minnesota, and we wish to make our house at 5570 Shore Road our primary residence. Shore Road cuts through our property, and divides it into two parcels. It is a public road, dead end, with two families living beyond us to the east. The house has approximately 1,400 square feet of living space, but is too small to accommodate our family. We wish to make the following changes: a) add a second story to the house, and b) build an attached garage to the house. A semi-enclosed garage currently exists across the road from the house, but it is neither fully functional or attractive. The garage we wish to build would line up with Tad Shaw's garage to the east, and would be more than 15 feet from the lot line that divides our properties. The road causes us hardship since it confines our ability to add livable space to the existing structure. We would prefer to add livable space at the ground level, but an upward addition within the existing foundation parameters of the nNlse loJould meet our requirements, and would probably be more acceptable to the city and our neighbors. By granting us a variance to complete these additions, we believe that the property would be functionally improved for us and esthetically improved for the community. Thank you. 1 ~r>:;iUIY you.rs,) 1;-/1- t~ q c:~ J(~ ~ ,~ -~ /1 /"'. . ' I J )" .1 . ,/ ':f /~ L.. )"-.-0(., l L L - '::-J '-'-- ~-t - '-- '"-._____ Robert A. and Karen V. Miesen Exhibit C APPLICANT'S REQUEST LETTER Dated 31 December 1987 " ..:..... I '. . .' , .' 4'1It ?:J: ',0' - - ~-1-t T -_._--- - I I 1-.:1 I " .~ I tr :- ---~ I . I ~. 'r ii, :' ~.:s' \),i I I I ~! : I :t.,J-1 ~ ~~ I ~ I \:t~ .' 'Q"l .~ ' <: ~1.Cf'6 ~e. 1.." " I~' I I l ! I' I ~:l I ---1. ;' I . .' ' , I .~ ",;, . . , .,.I .~~ I'~ -\ ~ -'''; ..- ij -\ n. ..~' -II. II ' . t ..m.:..:..'..... .:./.1 :.; ,'j', . ., .: ..'..' :. . II' I \ :0 . . :;," , j .:: :t; I ~ i:::;,!~: i : i.:::~l~;'r . ;:<:1::" . ;~'I T; v..J :I:!!: :: V~l; j:.'t. f ~ L ." Y.. t }" -~ t .,. tj.I~. ~ r. .: , .' . r".. 1: f~: ~- , ....~or,. ~II c~{" ('-.' ":-"'. _ h;~ - > t~ /": '.. b 'x- ~~. ~II :::",.; "i.f / .:' " '" /"': ~ ft-.f :\,':. 'f'l '. I = l .,:f.,;' ; .' '. "", . " :1""'" t';, '; ; tl 1'o'! \ ' I' I:' I I II .' ~ I ~~. .J:;.: 'j ill" ,"'.1. 1l-. /--- !;f'!-: 'Ii ~ I \ I ,:'jo' I',' -<II "'~\..I I . I ~i;~',!'" I , e.VoI1 ~e.Nf- '=4 +- ',.,,' -- --:r..------ - - - =tt=:--- - -- ',' I .' . - I ----------11--- ~-"'_'-li!;; :,;:;.;1 .~ \ . Hi:;;!! :::.' 11.~!l '\,. '.::;.1:.1:..;1.,., '"_ ;' '!;,'i'", ::i : 1 iI ; I !j : . I i'l I i fll' .1---: III ! Ii Ii ::: ,I ' :!1;li:Hl,' i ! ,.1: t! Lj.~ ~.Jtr:..:.~ 0, 1- I , l' .-'- ,:z. .. "I L(,IL .'. . Z I ~e>. c '4' ~ .ttlf.iH) c '. '. '." . ~ '. '.~ '. . ..,;.:,;~ -,.' :.....,...~::..... .>.('; ". ,... '-, . ..... ==---====...---=-=..-:. '-'~Ia5e."'lo....,".".""...'::";'~';'..'.';. fOPmt>.,J .11>...-0+.. ., ~~~f: CJr' , :~:'};'~":}:t~'>::~~;,:":-~~. .~O~.~ ~/"~rl-r1I~rL ~~PRi~~:ilc: ':'~;~~~~~'Ij,:f~,.~" .\ . .I.o"...."......"..~;-...._.. ............. . "" ," ..,' .".. t" ...... ... ~~_..~ ---~-=-- '. . > ..._.,,: - _".~_J... _ ,:1' ~ f " .. ': - ~ '. . . ' ,~- " ... . -', - \-- ';--- -. ~ ------- --- 1',1 I"'. If- - - - .r'!!'!!.-"-__"'~~_lllCF? 1- ~:. '1 ... ----' U ~ I ._o~ i~ :! .J f . {<, \ .i-~I l~~-I"I:. ~; J( I~ ;! 'i. <;-:.~ I . I ~ " I,II-j It- I I ~I I - ..... "I II": I I ~,---l-' I 1,1. .----.' " I' ,~ ++"--~~~ +- ~--:I III ' ,I . 'r:~'I' . Ir~ : I ~ . ~.;; I. /" . ~ . I~: ,I' -rttIll!... ~= . - I'~ l~ I ;1 (\'. ..) ~ . ; I R I i I : ,I,V' \, r. ,I.':.,-'r..', 1f-+1' I .1 -4-;. \, .1'"' '-~ . , , >. t.~Yd ',).. + -' - -, )f{. ~ ~ I:),-~ f-rrl,"' c ~,I "'1- 'i I I " i~\ I \' J~ . . ll~ I :. 1 :~~ I : Lt ."' I-_~I ..';t J I 'i. -' ~""""'~~<. ~~.~nr:=t.i--=.- ~~. :1- -1-1- I I I~< _.-:~.I- I ---''''7-7', I I I I ,', , \ ~- -=---' I ....J 1- .J$.~"'=~' . . .., I " t=== ! ..'- I>'<l..=. t=----~"'. +-:.'-0' --- ~~;.)~l..'(~'~:C,...:'.-';~~.' ,-,-~-,.;;;;,"t':-:-l-r"'-':'~ -~. ....-.. ..-=-,~~=-.. -- --, ' ~ .... "",., ", -e>oe:. i ~'~:J"-<-"- _c-' -.--~...-- ..._~_.- '~","I,."..~~~}NC~'~!l ,', ~J~i-J~gf-E.r1I(~r, . !-11f;;.0c..r1 .,.. " " rlr~~lr: . rt-- ...:t:'"- ;,.,11,., I -4 ) III L/-- IIF 1Jl t --~~ ~ l~ 1-~ ~- ~ -1 rt--- ~ I "'I l~ I \ I is I I I I , I I I p--- ---... - . -...... " ~. i ) i' I~ . ___wn ~-=-=~..] 'ji I). ---..----:-. .1 . L.. t. ~ ,. \" \ \ tl-- I I I I I I I I i:t" - //( / / ....--- "t---- I'f~~.' II I I I "If.... ""'"'It ,.. ',' " \ \ ~:: ~l ~... t 'i -l~ .t Ii ft ~':. t.. :. 1- .;.' i , ~ \J 1 I, ;! I I I Ii !/ II I, I i I :1 !, il I' II I I I ! , , \ \ \ " fti p~ ~~ ~f t ~.,~,;f"";,:",,,,, ; l.9S'}'f<.',.' ,,".",>.: ~,~~P.IS~~'~C:~'i ~ I , , ~ : ~oe:.rJ~ ~ ~lT"lorJ 12:' I ro- t!.. ~ I f7t?~, J. ~ n,f;hl::-1 ,~~~~t1W~1' - ~, ffi ;G /11.) -rIS' t;)~Fi I Ir ~ \,j Of- I I. I \ I "r"- - n",J II I .'- i I II II ,I I ~ IjUU i I I=~n 'J ~ ~ I t:J ,81 I i , ! , i ' . . ~ ~,,.. . . 1. GERALD HAYES 5560 SHORE ROAD SHOREWOOD. MINNESOTA 55331 ~ '-I /7F, ~:~l{IAA1d~CP ~~~.. Pet p 3"t - 1/7- 1-1 -.1..:a.. -eJOt> I ~ Oc>O :z. ?Po' ~~$~' We-~~~~& ~~~ tUe~ ~ t'7t~ JhdMd~~ ~~ ~~ . ~~~~~tUe ~ , tu-d~ ~ <Pk ,. ~1lkM- ~~ ~~.. /J{~ )J~'cp.~ (5s-~-O s>U7t-4f~ 11..6 . . TAD and MAR Y S HAW 5580 She.re Road Shorewood, Minnesota 55331 February 29, 1988 PlanniY'lg CommissioY'1 City OT Shorewood Ladies and Gentlemen: Our neighbors, Bob and Karen Miesen, have shown us plans for the improvement OT their property. These plans include adding a second Tloor to their existing home, and adding a garage to the dwelling. We endorse their plans and feel that their eTforts will make a deTinite improvement in the neighborhood. Our son is in a program at school this evening, and we are unable to attend the Planning Commission meeting. We would both be very happy to answer any questions OT any members if that member would call us, or we will be available at your next meeting. We fully endorse the Miesens' plans. Thank you for your consideration of their request. ~i Y'lcere I y, /l . (hGC-'~ ' ~"', ~ ~~. If.- _ ,~~~;;.":'.t;::'0,- -.st:?/'\ ,.......::,,-,-';.. . ~ ".- ":'-<.. ....:..' . CITY OF SHOREWOOD MAYOR RobertRascop COUNCI L Jan Haugen Kristi Stover Robert Gagne "Barb Brancel ADMINISTRATOR Daniel J. Vogt 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD . SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 . (612) 474-3236 MEMORANDUM TO: PLANNING CC>>mISISON. MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: BRAD NIELSEN DATE: 25 FEBRUARY 1988 RE: BAYWOOD SHOPPING CENTER - PROPOSED ZONING ORDINANCE TEXT AMENDMENT FILE NO.: 405 (88.04) BACKGROUND Mr. Richard Dreher. Dreher and Associates. has applied for a zoning ordinance text amendment which would extend planned unit development provisions to commercial development. He proposes to develop a retail shopping center at 5620 and 5660 Manitou Road (see Site Location map - Exhibit A. attached). The primary reason for his request is to provide for a zero-lot line arrangement with the Tom Thumb property (5660 Manitou Road). The owner of the Tom Thumb property wishes to be part of a unified development while still retaining individual ownership of his property. Section 1201.25 Subd. 2. precludes commercial uses in planned unit development unless there is a minimum site size of 20 acres. The proposed text aendment is not site-specific. If approved. the provisions would apply to various cOllllDercial properties. Nevertheless. it is helpful to see how the aendment would apply to an actual project. In this regard. the applicant has submitted conceptual plans and information relative to his proposed development. These are contained in the attached Exhibits B - E. Additional background relative to the developer and builder is provided with this report. ANALYSIS/RECOMMENDATION Planned unit development for commercial property has been mentioned several times in the past two years. The reason commercial p.u.d. was limited to 20 acre sites was to satisfy residents who were afraid that p.u.d. was a trick to allow commercial development in residential areas. A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore /~ 1le: Dreher hsoc. Zoning Ord. Text Aaendaent 25 February 1988 Since the adoption of the current regulations. it is felt that City officials as well as residents have become more comfortable with the use of p.u.d. There have been development requests where commercial p.u.d. would have been useful. The RapidOil/Video Update property on Highway 7 would have been better handled by p.u.d. The Crepeau Dock property should have been processed as a p.u.d. Planned unit development for commercial property carries the same advantages as residential p.u.d. 1. It can be used to accommodate a variety of principal uses on one site (i.e. a shopping center). As in the applicant's case it can also accOBRodate a variety of ownerships within a project. 2. P.U.D. provides flexibility in design standards. In the applicant's case it would allow a zero-lot line arrangement. 3. Zoning approvals are consolidated. eliminating procedural overlapping. For example. the Baywood Shopping Center. as proposed. would require the following actions on the part of the City: a. Variance for zero-lot line (not appropriate since no hardship exists). b. Conditional use permit (C.U.P.) for motor fuel sales. c. C.U.P. for joint use driveways and parking. d. C.U.P. for multiple tenant signage. e. C.U.P. for self-storage facility (walkout level in the rear). 4. P.U.D. provides the City with greater control over development projects than traditional zoning. The development agreement enables negotiation of solutions to potential problems. Additional conditions can be . incorporated into the development agreement. Under the terms of our current zoning ordinance. planned unit development is handled as a rezoning. For commercial development a second type of approach is recommended. Commercial p.u.d. would be listed under each of the commercial districts as a conditional use. Allowable uses within a canmercial p.u.d. would be limited to the uses listed under a specific district. The request would follow the procedural requirements and standards set forth in our existing p.u.d. section. Section 1201.25 of the Zoning Ordinance is already set up to accommodate p.u.d. by conditional use permit. The only thing needed is a brief section establishing p.u.d. by conditional use. Section 1201.06 of the Code is already reserved for that purpose. A draft of the necessary text change is included as Exhibit F. It is important to realize that a p.u.d. which involves a mixture of uses or includes uses not listed in the subject zoning district. would still be processed as a rezoning to the P.U.D. District. - 2 - lle: Dreher & Assoc. Zoning Ord. Text Aaendment 25 February 1988 It is further recommended that the p.u.d./c.u.p. provisions be extended to the residential districts. Again. only uses listed in a specific district would be allowed within that district. For exaaple the R-lA district requires single-faaily residential lots to have 40.000 square feet of area. An R-1A. P.U.D. would be limited to single-faaily residential with a density of one unit per 40.000 square feet. The units could be clustered,however, to preserve soae natural feature of the land. Both the Robert S.C. Peterson Addition and the Silver Ridge Addition should have been processed this way. Although the process and the end result are the saae. the stigaa associated with rezoning is miniaized. The C.U.P. approach also eliminates the questions of spot zoning for small projects. It is anticipated that this second type of p.u.d. approach may present some confusion. It will be discussed further at Tuesday night's aeeting. BJN:ph cc: Dan Vogt Glenn Froberg Jim Norton Dick Dreher - 3 - t- - c' a ~ ~ All:> lIl\')'+ ~o'~L~ '., O ~'lL. AJ.I :> .1.0' : 10\ ..., ~ :!" floC! --..\I ~ ~. ~ - '" ..., ~ ~ ~~, ~-!l '" ,.~ .6- ,,0. . J ,- '''I ~ ~ ---rIr'JI'" Y'J A. ~ I I 'C-.-x. 7,;) s. '. L.....: - im '\H~. " ..... c/....,. I,: ., / ..... . ...../ --... \(\ ---- \ ,,- S'E'; ~ I i.C~-'--'--- N N ~ -- .J -TCSt-- N ~ ~ "'f'.,,'r---- o ~ N ~ ."i.1-jf------.- ..... ,zm ~ '5 ~~ 10' 4-~ ~: ____~~t:.f "'Ii; 6tr O. .~:~. .~~~~o~c-- . fl'"" . <""..... ..... -- -- -' .~ nn .1i.t."''Z o Ht . 'COt\l "---' -:i' ~ __~n_'_ ___ CD 1- ~ --~.., ~ ~~iF---'T '"' ~ '" CtI <- ---'(\1 ~ -C\l-f---- ""') ~O) :::...J T -;, '" on '" ,,", . s. : Ii '~'I -- , III --.--- .. \..... ..;.. '.!. ~M " '~ (' l;B 7C '., -,,~cz 1 , 9.., 101 I~ :r--. ~, <::"' U.66f U) ~' ~ '---" < ";>' - - - - -- r - l~~ ~~.. -- ~.. ~' \ -::. ." ~ :-.: <:r .. ..... o (\J ~ \ ~ \ ~ It) ~ \~ \ \ ~ r;-' I- --------Q- ~ ..J .-. -_..\ 'f'~ ..... ~ Exhibit A SITE LOCATION Baywood Shopping Center .!: PROJECT NARRATIVE The development we are proposing is located on the corner of County Road 19 and Smithtown Road in Shorewood. It is depicted graphically in the drawing labeled SD1. Our development represents a 20,400 square foot compact retail center providing a grouping of neighborhood businesses along with 14,000 lower leval recreational vehicle storage. The retail center is placed on 2.58 acres with 117 parking spaces for employees and the public. The main anchor involved in the center is Tom Thumb. Tom Thumb will occupy over 4,800 square feet of retail sales and service. Some prospective tenants have been identified for the thirteen retail/lease spaces of 1,200 square feet each. Our development proposal groups essential goods and service facilities on one site in a new development of Shorewood. We anticipate a high v.olume of pedestrian and vehicle traffic and have designed the development according- lYe An attractive streetscape, landscape and sight line screening plans have been addressed. Exhibit B PROJECT NARRATIVE . . PROJECT DATA Site Area 2.58 Acres Legal Description: Lot 26, Subdivision No. 133 Total Area 20,400 S.F. 14,575 S.F. 1 ,595 S.F. 36,570 S.F. Building Areas: Retail Level Storage Level Common Area Parking: 117 spaces including three handicapped dimensioned spaces. Building Hei~hts: 17'- 0" or less Construction Materials: horizontal shiplap Tedwood siding and insulated glass storefront. Site Access: Three access points located on County Road 19. Signage: 1. Main center pylon sign - 24' - 0" in height. 2. Building signage defined by sign criteria. Service/Loading: Allservice/loading areas are screened from sight and located on the west elevation of the building. Lighting: All parking lot lighting will have a minimum of 2 ft./candles, average of 3' - 0" above ground level. All lighting will be shielded from direct glare and illumination of adjacent properties. Waste Facilities: All waste facilities will be located within enclosures compatible with building exterior. Rooftop Hechanical Equipment: All mechanical equipment will be screened by 4'- 0" min. parapet wall around entire perimeter of building. Exhibit C PROJECT DATA . c::::I a:f iii .. F ~ ~ CJ . n ~ CV iii " IF' ~ ~ " ;g~ O::T "tl ..... OtT CIl ..... ~rt t:l j~ ,~ I. · ! ~ II i : . ; ii i I : ~ : ,,"H "9. I;! r! I I "t I, 'I~ I I I I I ; ; , '~ pi' , ; , I Ic;;;J , I'" I' , It:!!:a N' ~j..NIGIY'~;~ ~'Ni. .'. I~ .: I I . :! lc=t I ' ,; ii' '~I~' ! Ii, ',' -( G) ':I' 1~'It:111 "0, I ~ '. ... i ~ ,i ; /6 Ii! ~ '1< ~ ~ I ~ i ~ ; ~' I :16 ~ I t i I ~ ; ~ I i ~ I~ If ~ I J ! !' 2 :=: ~ II Bill! ; I S Ii! J i ~ I ~ : i ! ~; ~ ~ ! ~ IV ... Ii 1~1~:z! ! I Iill I · .!. i INI....I..I..I~: I ,~ ~ I ~ I! i! I ~ ~! ~ I ~ ; ~ i ~ I ~ I ~ ! iii I . I I Ii! ,I' 18 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I I 1,111 1,1 ! I I .: =: I : i I. ~. .'l I Q , ~I , H~~ n ;-,.: ,. ~ ..,; ..' ~ .' ' · ~I !L....:__ 1 , ~YE r ' ... ~ _"Y/ i 0 I I !p~h I~, \~; i~'i~: jj', ~ tl~ liiy1i 1:1 i 10." L__~ fJ i ~,j'. ~ , .) ;!~ I "" ~~ R i~. ~~,. ~"1 ::: ~ ~J'I/ ~ ~ ~..,:~2~ I ~ { -tie I ~ --~~-I--'- ;--- ~~:;'il I J >>.... (- "< ,~ .,. I ~. c ~; ~..- 'i t ~ , 0 ~(({) ~.. .'l~ I.... - I \ ~ ~ J: .....~ J: "i~ 1 _ 'r ~ 1 N J I ~~~.. -lI-- .. ~p til I I~ \ t\~8; It ~"' !IC~' tis I I~ \ \~i ~"' : OJ, til '1 I \ ~&i' ~ ~ :; Ii!') ~ I 'l\ .~ -. C\ ~ \\ \~)~,., .' , ~; .' Ir: t,~:~' ' Ir':'~ .' ~' ,~)) 8 iii U1" ~ !!:,. ~~ ~h! I'" ~f ~~ 01 ~ru: ~L .1\ lI! \ !~ ~~l i ~ ~ I! ~,~ . ~.. ~C~ I I~'~' .. \ \l~.7~~ ;:)~i~~~ J\' L ;..,_ I (! , ~ .-~ y ,-.,.. g''''' (!- 1"'.8' <' 2Je)' . Ui~~I~!'i J i~~ ~ ~Ia 0 01;1 rt'" b Q5~ &liii. iii fiS- ...:s.r'" n o iF..... ~o .., 1:1 ~..... ~~ i:~;G c:4 1111 81-1-'. ~ :I/)ll_fJ~ it' pi' ~==".,',. ..... 21 PAaE& . Ill')" T"r?" CIl H ~ ~ ~ CIl ~ t:r.I ~ ~ ! QII<icVi g]J::~ (I) U)aI ~ 2c~~; ~8t.l= ~ (')::11- I 7iI'<4 ~~IIl" NX'" -<41> ,.111 :m..._ 21 mo-< ~ 6 >m-< o 210100 .111_ m N-4:l . Z"E ~ .i5!~~ 2~1II ~.... 0 -4"'0 I ~ -42,.>:;; ...~;: :Ii 0 -it:!-< !:l -mz mZO i~ -4 ~l~~ii Zm i >iatO> Z 'II: 2IG)C ..~- ~ !: ~ <21.... ~~~m~ > .. 21.... ... ~m! .. 0(. . III "I2IOi~ [;~! \' I ~ a 1.1 f ~ c::{J~ : i Iii ~ @ IfUiJfIj : I ' I r. @'>>C;Si I' I~ I ~ fi)F' -- ~~ I, I f. . ~~ I [III m= ID ca.;: 9J-mr; -,..... .. = .m... wilEl;; i -01. · n .... 01 _ - .. .. ,... . wCi n: 01. .. .. !r s~ I-f .... is" Ii':! ~ ~ ~ I-f ~ ~ ~ en .' , . ~i ~~ c::g = e ~ @D PH ~~ I .1 iUiill ~~ m ~ I~ < ~ ~ c::::::I o ~ .J .Ii I 2J-15 .. =1"'" .. i,=i I =_ a , . i ~ I I I I I I I I l- I I I I. I I I In!!!! ~m-~ _i ~~~ '.': %0 '". .~ ~ ~.> ..." c:J r-~l I I i I , I j iiii1 rn ~ . I i . c:=<I I' fMI I I i F I : iii < t; ~ I' 9J ! I c:::::I I 0 ~ I r . ~ ~ I I ! 1 I I I I I II I I ! I I ! I I I I I I j -- I I ~-~ I \ I I .. I I I I I ~1 \ll~i~~i ~ ~5 n . '" il~Z]l, n....... I ~1II; ::1 ..... 5 ~~~ ,;; ill '. :I ~5ia1 ~~~~--- I ""0 _ilO::!o( ~ll :1\11. . . ... ~!llo of zm __ 5 i ..I:~OZ i z~ -- I lO!lDO... \11m -......... , ~ ..~~i;i ~~~ m ........... . . ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 1201.06 OF THE SHOREWOOD CI'lY CODE THE CI'lY COUNCIL OF THE CI'lY OF SHOREWOOD. MINNESOTA. ORDAINS: Section 1. City Code Section 1201.06 is hereby amended to read: "1201. 06: ADMINISTRATION. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT Subd. 1. Purpose: This Section is intended to allow flexibility within zoning districts while maintaining land use compatibility with surrounding neighborhoods. Judo r'\ ,.--- -..... (i ,-1">'" . -):V--"-i". 2. Application: Within the zoning districts contained in Sections 1201.10 through 1201.23 planned unit development is allowed by conditional use permit. Land use and densities are limited to those which are specified in each individual district. Subd. 3. Special Procedures. The establishment of a P.U.D. by conditional use permit shall be subject to the procedures and_ requirements for conditional ~e p}i,rmits as tlIJ"liaed in Section 1201.04 of this Ordinance 8d ~ the standards and criteria outlined in Section 1201.25 of this Ordinance." ~ Section 2. City Code Section 1201.11 Subd. 4. is hereby amended b~ adding: t7- c:R- cP r:tJ-~- - /:2 () / - [) "C. Residential planned unit development as regulated by Section 1201.06 of this Ordinance." Section 3. City Code Section 1201.17 Subd. 4. is hereby amended by adding: "C. Residential planned unit development as regulated by Section 1201.06 of this Ordinance." Section 4. City Code Section 1201.19 Subd. 4. is hereby amended by adding: lid. Residential or commercial planned unit development as regulated by Section 1201.06 of this Ordinance." Section 5. City Code Section 1201.20 Subd. 4. is hereby amended by adding: "d. Commercial planned unit development as regulated by Section 1201.06 of this Ordinance." Section 6. City Code Section 1201.21 Subd. 4. is hereby amended by adding: "g. Commercial planned unit development as regulated by Section 1201.06 of this Ordinance." Section 7. City Code Section 1201.23 Subd. 4. is hereby amended by adding: "f. Commercial planned unit development as regulated by Section 1201.06 of this Ordinance." Section 8. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Shorewood. Minnesota. this _ day of . 1988. Robert Rascop. Mayor ATTEST Sandra L. Kennelly City Clerk Exhibit F PROPOSED TEXT AMENDMENT . . DlCi!;tJ.ItK AND ASSOCIATES. INC. Suite 126. 5275 Edina Industrial Blvd Edina. Minnesota 55435 RICHARD E. DlC.IUmK JR. PRKSIDBNT AllY GDlPLBR-DKU1uc VICE PRKSIDDft' Dreher and Associates, Inc. is a small shopping development company located in Minneapolis, Minnesota. It is primarily involved in retail and multi-use development in Minnesota, Iowa, Wisconsin and Illinois. BAClCGROmID 01" PRINCIPALS AllY GBHPLD-DRIiH':", Education: B.S., Michigan State University, Retail Merchandising. Retail Experience: Dayton's Department Stores - Management and Merchandising - 2 years. Associated Dry Goods - Buyer - 3 years. Leasing and Development: Dreher and Associates - 2 1/2 years. RICHARD JC. D1c&ImK JR. Education: B.A., University of Minnesota, Political Science. M.A., University of Minnesota School of Public Affairs. Government Experience: Local Government - Assistant to the Mayor of Duluth - 4 years. Principal Management Analyst, Hennepin County - 2 1/2 years. Federal Government - Special Assistant to Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare, Washington, D.C. - 1 year. Retail Experience: Director of Marketing, Planning, Research and Real Estate, Dayton's Department Stores - 7 years. Stores developed: St. Cloud, MN - 100,000 s.f. Sioux Falls, SD - 100,000 s.f. Grand Forks, ND - 100,000 s.f. LaCrosse, WI - 100,000 s.f. Burnsville, HN - 200,000 s.f. St. Paul, MN - 383,000 s.f. remodel. , . . Development Experience: Development consultant for: Green Bay, WI (expansion of Port Plaza) Normal, IL (College Park Mall) Minneapolis, MN (Calhoun Square) Projects Completed for Fees: Barclay Square - Rochester, MN Westwind Plaza - Minnetonka, MN Westgate Mall - Brainerd, MN Northbridge - Albert Lea, MN Pavilion Place - Roseville, MN. Current Projects (Under C~nstruction or DeveloPment): The Crossings - Cedar Rapids, IA Countryside Center - Baraboo, WI Mankato Mall Expansion - Mankato, MN. Algonquin Town Center - Algonquin, IL Southcross Plaza - Burnsville, MN Baywood Shops - Shorewood, MN Countryside Center - Burnsville, MN Projects Completed and Owned: River's Bend Plaza - Ramsey, MN WEIS COMPANIES Weis Builders, Inc. Weis Building Corp. 2227 N.W. 7th Street. P.O. Box 6757 Rochester, Minnesota 55903 507-288-2041 .;.. . -.;.',...~' . ~ . .. ~'; . , .. . ' --. ~ . . ~, ,- . -. . . , . ~t "" ~_ :r.-:""~. ;:' :....~ .......; ~ ._~ ~' , ~ ..... ._~. _ . I -. ' SHOPPING CENTERS Village in Valhalla Shopping Center - Rochester. MN Barlow Plaza - Rochester, MN Winona Mall - Winona, MN Barclay Square - Rochester, MN Westwind Plaza - Minnetonka, MN Marketplace - Rochester, MN Pavilion Place - Roseville, MN Northwind Plaza - Brooklyn Park, MN Maplendge Center - Maplewood, MN Best Buy Plaza - Rochester. MN Apache Mall Renovation - Rochester, MN Westgate Mall - Brainerd, MN Grove Square - Maple Grove, MN Cub Foods Retail Center - Rochester, MN Prairieview Center - Eden Prairie, MN Highland Park Center - Highland Park, MN RETAIL STORES A.S. Beck Shoe Store Penney's Beauty Salon Dayton's Remodeling Projects St. Paul Clothiers Hanny's Men's Wear Hanny's Red Hanger Shop Schmitt Music Radio Shack Sound World Stevenson's Benson Optical Gingerbread House Schook Electronics Kinney Shoes Picadilly Square Jerome Jewelry Zales Jewelry Wallin's Pet Center Orange Julius Brown Photo Carousel Snack Bar Dahl House Evenson's Hallmark Cards Musicland Village Stitchery Apache Mall Expansion Hers Women's Wear Andy's Uquor Store The Johnson Company Remodel Sherwin Williams Paint Store Sears Store - Remodel Snyder Drug - Miracle Mile - Remodel Red Owl Store - Miracle Mile - Remodel Red Owl Store - Northbrook Center - Remodel Donaldson's Dept. Store - Remodel Radio Shack - Northbrook Center Picadilly Square - Maplewood World Travel - Kahler Dison's Formal Wear Country Store - Northbrook Center - Remodel Anderson's Formal Wear - Remodel IGA Store - Elton Hills IGA Store - SE. Blondell Cockta'il Lounge Weber & Judd Store Casual Connection Michael's Hailmark Stuart's - Rochester Evenson's Hallmark Barlow Plaza Vineyards Herberger's lJ. Maxx - Rochester Thrifty Snyder Drug lJ. Maxx - Burnsville Pearle Vision Center Stuart's - Roseville Best Buy Store - Rochester Barclay Gallery MULTI.FAMILY HOUSING North Broadway Apartments - 20units W. Laursen Apartments - 17 units Pougaliales Apartment Addition - 12 units J. Chafoulias Apartments - 24 units Silver Acres Townhouses - 5<1 units Berkshire Village - 90 units King George Apartments - 17 units Rochester Towers - 90 unit high rise Windsor Court - 42 units Theobald Apartments - 32 units Rochester Square - 104 units Olympik Village - 140 units Westminster Square Condcminium Conversion - 54 units Park Place - 72 units 8th Street Apartments - 9 units 19 Norwest Condominiums - Completion Feathersound Condominiums - 5 units CandlewOad Apartments - Completion Edelweiss - 12 units High Point Condominiums - Masonry & Concrete Work - 48 units Valley View Condominiums - 96 units Springer Apartment Remode! - 16 units Castlemar Apartments Remodel - 17 units REM Rochester - 20 units Morningside Terrace, Winona - 54 units Lincoln Square. Owatonna - 64 units Fairmont Square, Fairmont - 64 units Town's Edge, Foribault - 64 units Canterbury Sq.. Fairmont - 12 units Fox Meadows, Pine Island - 32 units Eastside Village, Stewartville - 30 units St. Vallerie. LaCrosse - 100 units Greenridge, Waterloo - 32 units Clover Patch, St. Charles - 32 units Centre Square, Sauk Centre - 40 units Wyndmark Apartments - 62 units The Homes of Tealstone - 24 units Rem Park Heights. Red Wing -10units Buena Vista Condominiums - 36 units Cedar Square. Cedar Foils - 70 units Carnaby Remodel - 60 units Rochester Village Renovation - 412 units SENIOR CITIZEN HOUSING Senior Housing. Jackson - 60 units Seniors Housing. Plainview - 40 units Crossroads Square. Waterloo - 81 units Harbor Point. Two Harbors - 42 units Seniors Housing, Stewartville - 32 units Seniors Housing, Kasson - 36 units Okabena Towers. Worthington - 60 units Camelot. Waterloo - 82 units RiveNiew Housing, Mazeppa - 12 units Sf. Lucas Riverside. Foribault - 30 units Lakewood Apartments. Chatfield - 24 units Midtown Manor, Hayfield - 24 units NURSING HOMES Ettadel Nursing Home - Lewiston Matteson Nursing Home Remodel - Eyota Pine Haven Nursing Home - Pine Island Field Crest Nursing Home - Hayfield Stewartville Nursing Home - Stewartville Red Wing Nursing Home - Red Wing River Falls Care Center Woodside Convalescent Center - Remodel " COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS Skelgas Supply Building Dison Cleaners Addition Schmidt Printing Office & Plant KirckQf Plumbing & Heating Office & Warehouse Thien Well Company Office & Warehouse Woodruff Company Warehouse- Addition Fisher Oil Showroom & Warehouse Coca-Cola Bottling Warehouse Addition Mack Truck Garage Murphy Motor Freight Terminal North Star Bar & Lounge Rochester Sand & Gravel Office & Warehouse Ability Building Center - Remodel Hamm's Distributing Office & Warehouse Clutch & Transmission Office & Garage Rochester Diesel Garage 100 1st Avenue Building Lobby - Remodel Rochester Outdoor Tennis Club - Remodel Continental Bakery Addition & Remodel Friedell Building - U of M - Remodel Cosmopolitan Sparts & Swim Club - Renovation Overhead Door Co. Office & Warehouse Rochester Granite Co. Showroom & Plant . . '. .' '. . . . . .' ..... . ........ ::: '~,::'d' ~> ,: ,;::~~::L~,:. :::: ;.;,'".,'[::J::;..~. ',,:.; Tropic Bowling Lones Bemel Auto Ports Showroom & Warehouse Forges of Rochester Showroom & Plant Alexander Auto Electric Showroom & Garage Arrow Steel Supply Office Warehouse Culligan Soft Water Soles & SeNice Rochester Guest House Treatment Center Dieter Paper & Morine Showroom & Warehouse Oakview Theater - Apache Moll NW. Bell Telephone Garage Skate Country Roller Rink Heritage Pet Hospital KOLM Transmitter Building Seven-Up Bottling Co. Office & Warehouse Doughboy Turkey Hatchery Building Rochester Educational SeNice Building - Remodel US Post Office - Remodel - Rochester Hall Olmsted County Group Home for Boys Rochester City Garage & WarehoiJse Rochester Pumphouses - I #17-20-24-18-25-23 Rochester Utilities Electric Substation Airport Tower Building - Rochester Rochester Pre-Chlorination Facility Mayo Civic Auditorium -, Remodel Soldiers Field Golf Club Addition Bovine Building - Olmsted County Fairgrounds Rest Area Station 1-90 Dresbach Rest Area Station 1-90 Dexter Rest Area Station 1.90 Marion Rest Area Station 1-35 Albert Leo School Bus Garage - Pine Island County Garage - Goodhue Martin County Low Enforcement Center - Foirmont Fire Station - Lake City Fire Station - Pine Island Fire Station - Oronoco Fire Station - St. Charles Water Treatment Plant - LaCrescent Water Treatment Plant - Remodel - Winona Power Plant Remodel - Spring Volley Pump House - MantoNiIle Municipal Liquor Store - Spring Volley Municipal Liquor Store - Stewartville Municipal Liquor Store - Rushford Municipal Building - Spring Valley Municipal Building Remodel - Preston Water Treatment Plant Building - Wabasha Rochester Civic Theater Mayo Pork Bond Shelter Olmsted Health Center - Remodel PORT of Olmsted County - Remodel Rochester Pork Deportment Office Rochester State Hospital- Remodel Olmsted County Recreation Center Olmsted County Low Enforcement CenJer United Building Center Addition Form & Home - Dodge Center P&B Constructors - Owatonna Monson Distributing - Red Wing Camero Art Studios - Lewiston Tubeco Manufacturing - Owatonna Kruger's Formica - Wabosha Telephone Relay Building - Hader Telephone Relay Building - New Market Don's Tire Service - Dodge Center NW. Bell Building - Stewartville Telephone Building - Pine !sland Benson Brothers - River foils. Wise. Lee Bus Garage - Red Wing S.B. Foot Tanning Co. - Red Wing ABC Theater - Forgo, North Dakota Ratcliff Seed Building - Austin Clothing Core Center - Albert Leo Matt's Body Shop - Spring Volley Clinic Addition - Fairmont Red Owl Store Addition - Stewartville N.W. Bell Telephone - St. Charles Jonwoy Tool & Die Company - Winona Rochester Airport Addition Macken Funeral Home Addition Learning Tree Day Care Center Nybos Bowling Center - Red Wing King's Run Car Wash Greenway Co-op Convenience Store Carisch Theatres - Barclay Square International Fitness Center - Rochester International Fitness Center - Roseville International Fitness Center - , Minnetonka Knights of Columbus - Rochester Senior Citizens Center - Rochester Elks Club - Rochester Eagles Lodge Addition Crescent Electric - Office !Warehouse AUTO DEALERSHIPS Davis Olds Melrose Ford - Melrose. MN Peterson Motors - Ford - Spring Volley House Chevrolet - Stewartville Interstate GMC Lewiston Auto - Chevrolet Pastier & Eggers - Buick-Opel-Mazda Dabelow Pontiac - Cannon Falls Universal Ford Addition Rochester Lincoln-Mercury BANKS Byron State Bank - Byron First State Bonk Remodel - Red Wing Root River State Bonk - Chatfield First State Bank Addition - Fountain Root River State Bank Addition - . Chatfield - Norwest Bank Northslde - Rochester Federal Land Bank - Mankato Norwest Bonk - Faribault Midwest Federal Downtown Branch OFFICE BUILDINGS City Loan & Finance Remodel Olmsted Co. Bank & Trust Remodel Peoples Natural Gas Office Remodel Alpek Office/Shop Remodel NW. Bell Telephone Office Addition Mutual of Omaha Office Weichselbaum Office Building KWEB Radio Station Remodel TSP 1500 Office Building TSP 1530 Associates Office Building Burrough's Office Building Weis Companies Office Building O'Brien Ehrick & Wolf Law Office Remodel Apache Moll Office Remodel Thorp Loon & Thrift Remodel Production Credit Building - St. Charles McNeil us Office - Dodge Center Springer Building Schmidt-Goodman Office Roche~erSchoolBus Schroeder Professional Building Schmidt Printing Cascade Office SeNice Ctr. Plumber's Union Office Merrill Lynch Realty Greenway Co-op Office J&L Travel MOTELS Gaslite Inn Fifth Avenue Motel Darst Heart-Q-Town Motel Linahans Motel & Restaurant - Winona Ranch Motel - Remodel Milton Hotel - Remodel Blondell Motel and Restaurant Campbell Hotel - Remodel Brentwood Motor Inn Blondell Motel Addition Royale Suites SERVICE STATIONS Conoeo Station Hillcrest Skelly Shell Station - Red Wing Co-op Station - Rochester Murphy Oil Company Standard Oil Station Co-op Station - Spring Valley Roy's Skelly DX Station Mobil Station Westgate 'ikelly Standard Oil . Gulf Oil Station Mobil Station Standard Oil - Apache Midas Muffler Shop Super America - S.E. Greenwoy Co-op ~ . ~ .. - . ~ ~ - "-' . ...~ ~ ~ ~ .' ~ ,\ ..' , ," ". - : ~ ' , - , .' : ~ ,'.. .... ,- -, .~[_.~.- :....:.. > .' /~~~:.(>: ' :. ,:'" :',: ~.,\'~'.~.", """0"":':' . ~ . < , .' INDUSTRIAL BUIlDINGS Skelgas Supply Building Dison Cleaners Addition Schott Distributing Warehouse Ace Moving & Transfer Addition IBM Building 652 Fit-Up IBM Pump Building IBM Computer Room Facility IBM Warehouse Building 203 IBM ITl Building 105 IBM Warehouse Building 205 IBM Mobil Generator IBM 652 Modules IBM Earth Satellite Station IBM 203 Alterations IBM 109 Clean Room IBM Office Modules IBM 002/004 Renovation Les Westrom Building Admiral Merchants Truck Terminal Pepsi-Cola Distributing Company Professional Instruments Manufacturing Building Stauffer Chemical Addition Seneca Foods Canopy Extension Seneca Foods Husker Building Addition Seneca Foods Plant Addition Seneca Foods Freezer Addition Custom Sandblasting Building Rochester School Bus Garage Fairway Manufacturing Building Minn. Malting Addition - Cannon Falls McNeilus Manufacturing - Dodge Center McNeilus Truck Garage - Dodge Center Mankato Municipal Garage AMPI Milk Evaporator Addition K&G Manufacturing Cannon Equipment Co. - Connon foils Ehler Machine Products CHURCHES St. Luke's Episcopal Church Lotter Day Saints Church Addition Resurrection Church Addition St. Paul's Church St. Olaf Church Bethany Lutheran Church Holy Cross Lutheran Church St. Pius X Catholic Church American Lutheran Church St. Ignatius Church Congregational Church Our Saviors Lutheran Church Mt. Olive Lutheran Church Christ the King Catholic Church St. John's Altar - Remodel Christ Lutheran Church RESTAURANTS/LOUNGES Burger KiOg Restaurant Kentucky Fried Chicken - S.E. McDonald's Drive-In - Apache Moll Randy's Drive-In - Red Wing Quarterbacks Restaurant Kentucky Fried Chicken - N.W Carter's Restaurant Addition Von Felt's Restaurant Airport Restaurant Black Sheep Club - Minneapolis Country Kitchen - Rochester Bacchus Lounge Outrigger Cocktail Lounge Hollywood Lounge Richard's Roost Restaurant White House Restaurant Michaels of Mankato Perkin's Cake & Steak - Remodel North Star Inn Ground Round - Remodel &Additions Michaels (Since 1950) Hubbell House - Mantorviile Mr. Pizza - Addition & Remodel Snappy Stop Barlow Garden Restaurant Wong's Cafe Carlton Cafe Old Country Buffet - Rochester, MN Old Country Buffet - Crystcl MN Gulliver's Restaurant Little Caesar's Restaurant EDUCATIONAL BUIlDINGS Washington School Addition Northrup School Addition Pinewood School Additions (3) Herbert Hoover School Area Va-Tech School Addition Sunset School - Remodel Mayo High School - Pool Replacement Harriet Bishop - Remodel School District # 1355 School District #1356 Sunnydale School # 1343 Hammond School Haverhill School St. Olaf Catacetical School - Kasson Lewiston High School Area Vo-Tech School - Winona High School Addition - Lake City Grade School Addition - Elgin High School Addition - Stewartville High School Remodel - Red Wing Running Track Addition - Stewartville State School Remodel - Owatonna State College Remodel - Winona State Training School RemodE'l - Red Wing St. James Multi-Purpose Gym - Foribault Multi-Purpose Gym - Red Wing High School Addition - Goodhue Bonner School Addition - Stewartville Montgomery Elementary School - Montgomery Winona State Rochester Center ".~l:$;::t~'~:~3.~'~>:~;;~~~7~:~~]i;~t1~~i+,~: ~~ ?~~~~~<~,.':'?l ~~~~'~J: :~:'{~~~1~~~;1.~~~ :~.;~; i.~'~:} ~ i~~~~li~~'~: ':'" , .;,' -: ' " . . MAYOR Robert Rascop COUNCI L Jan Haugen Kristi Stover Robert Gagne Barb Brancel ADMINISTRATOR Daniel J, Vogt . CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD . SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 · (612) 474-3236 MEMORANDUM TO: PLANNING COMMISSION. MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: BRAD NIELSEN DATE: 28 FEBRUARY 1988 RE: CREPEAU. CHARLES - CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS FILE NO.: 405 (85.22) TWo years ago the City reviewed a request by Charles Crepeau to rezone his property located at 23425 and 45 Smithtown Road (see Site Location map - Exhibit A. attached) from R-3B. Multiple-family Residential to C-4. Commercial Service District. He also requested conditional use permits for the following: 1. Open and outdoor storage 2. Open or outdoor service. sale. rental and display 3. Fabrication (cutting. assembly and/or welding) of wood or metal products. Background reports. dated 29 June and 22 August 1985. are attached for your review. While the zoning was approved. the Council directed the staff to prepare a resolution enumerating the c.u.p.'s and conditions of approval. The applicant was directed to supply several items of information (including a survey) to be incorporated into the resolution. This information apparently took quite some time to prepare and. until recently. was not followed up by this office. Given the length of time which has elapsed and the fact that the operator of the Garden Patch has revised his site plan somewhat (Exhibit B. attached). the matter has been scheduled for a new public hearing on 1 March. A draft resolution is attached for your review. One issue which is still partially unresolved is construction design of the proposed parking lot. Although Mr. Crepeau has agreed to pave and stipe the parking lot as shown on the proposed site plan. he objects to having to install continuous poured concrete perimeter curbing around the parking lot. A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonks's South Shore . . Re: Crepeau. Charles Conditional Use Permits 28 February 1988 He has submitted a soils report prepared by STS Consultants Ltd. The report provides a recommended pavement design but makes no mention of perimeter curbing. The City Engineer should review the soils report and comment as to whether continuous concrete curbing will work or not. This matter will be discussed further on Tuesday night. BJN:ph cc: Dan Vogt Glenn Froberg Jim Norton Charles Crepeau Tom Lingo - 2 - /' I 2000' 112MI. ~, e) e i SEPT: 1982 IATED CONSULTANTS INC. NORTH ,~ I ~,~ _ _ ~---t~~ ~~'~- __ .0_ ~....J 0011 I U_"__'_,,_u_u ~ \~~3 ~........Ill (G_ BAYJ 2A,~ '\ : s .............N-..~ ~ ( r ~ ~ ) I I ...........i'" 0 /'A.b~ ....~' .- 1\ "c _ ~'rr" ~ ). , ~n~, i ~g '~.. \ -1::.d · I r\\ i~~..,::j;~ ,.~wt--- '-~ .' · I~U II -~. '_i", - ~~rr- ~ /<./~ I l-ol-D..,-=f ~ 0 ~I---[~ t\_.,,!-~:~ ~ EXCELSIOR 'I' ~" --;J i J-LU-~ 't- 'ffn\ n I_~ja:= I ,( ~ :, .y~~.~ r- ,~~ eJ ~..<~~ I~'f--i-::- ~:':""'U " ~=PiIrli~ ,~~ !~d i 3~U~(V,~J~.t;I;L :T~1L ~ p~ l.NfE fl ~ i V" 'f/.: I ~ ~ -.. 11 .u- : !,.. ~I / 1. ~~.;,\.. ... == ~ u-.h i ; U ..l '; '/ '. r--: 'l i i tl ~ rJ: =;j ~<."'~ uU'l.uwrl rt.- 7' /. .JI- Jf [ ...J..l L.~ L,~ ~ ~/'.,>(, .,,' ..~~ ~~ ....-1~/. .;;:?-~. rrr I ~L/.: ~,~.... -1___'~ ~l;-~/. r~>,....... ......- ~ ..... \l '.~ I V ,~/ jIt..--... IL.. -..-..-.._"_0__ --J v....... ~_. .--1 :::- ~~~~bt~C~TION - ----.V. rOO' / _0. -- - Crepeau: Rezoning and Conditional t .... Use Perm1.t ./ )/ \\. U JI",,' IIi ~ ~ //~........ , . . ,~ N' ",1 'r ~j. " ~).J '." I . J. iVe"'"" j.."G....f ...\-"''' G- (,.;; ~re."" Q\$~ \.....~ ~e. .\..:,\ all' j,ct .""" ~ "\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ "'''rs~ Exhibit B REVISED SITE PLAH Garden Patch ,~ . . .r -DRAFT- RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT WHEREAS. on 9 June 1975. the Shorewood City Council granted a nonconforming use permit to Mr. Charles Crepeau to operate a fresh fruit and vegetable sales outlet (known as the Garden Patch) at 23425 Smithtown Road for a period not to exceed 10 years; and WHEREAS. Mr. Crepeau wishes to continue operation of the Garden Patch on a permanent basis; and WHEREAS. in order to maintain the Garden Patch as a permanent land use. Mr. Crepeau must bring his entire property. including ,Crepeau Docks. into conformity with the requirements of the C-4. Commercial Service District; and WHEREAS. in order to bring the property into conformity with the C-4 District. Mr. Crepeau has applied for conditional use permits (C.U.P.IS) for the following activities: 1. Open and outdoor storage as an accessory use. 2. Open or outdoor service. sale. rental and display as an accessory use. 3. Fabrication (cutting. assembly. and/or welding) of wood or metal products only when accessory to an activity allowed as a permitted use or conditional use within the C-4 District; and WHEREAS. the Shorewood Planning Commission held public hearings to consider the applicant's request on 6 August 1985 and again on 1 March 1988; and WHEREAS. the Planning Commission recommended approval of the C.U.P.IS listed above subject to certain conditions. NOW. THEREFORE. BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Shorewood hereby approves the conditional use permits listed herein subject to the following conditions: 1. The subject property shall be developed and ~intained based upon the approved site plan. attached hereto and made a part hereof. 'J.; .2 2. The property shall comply with the requirements of Section 1201~ Subd. 4. b.- d. of the Shorewood City Code. 3. The applicant must obtain an access permit from the Hennepin County Department of transportation. 4. The parking lot shown on the attached site plan shall be paved. curbed and striped in accordance with plans approved by the City Engineer. 5. Landscaping must be maintained in compliance with a landscape plan approved by the City Council. 6. Signage shall be installed and maintained in accordance with Section 1201.03 Subd. 11 of the Shorewood City Code. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Shorewood this . 1988. day of Robert Rascop. Mayor ATTEST: Sandra L. Kennelly. City Clerk MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: RE: FILE NO. BACKGROUND . . CITY OF SHOREWOOD MAYOR Robert Rascop COUNCI L Jan Haugen Tad Shaw -Kristi Stover Robert Gagne ADMINISTRATOR Daniel J. Vogt 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD . SHOREWOOD. MINNESOTA 55331 . (612) 474-3236 PLANNING COMMISSION, MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL BRAD NIELSEN 29 JUNE 1985 CREPEAU DOCK MANUFACTURING/GARDEN PATCH - REQUEST FOR REZONING AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 405 (85.22) Mr. Charles Crepeau has requested that the City change the zoning of his property located at 23425-45 Smithtown Road (see Site Location map - Exhibit A, attached) from R-3B (previously R-5), Multiple-family Residential, to C-4, Commercial Service District. His dock manufacturing facility and the Garden Patch store are currently nonconforming uses in the R-3B District. fJ ~li.J .... . , Based upon a request by Mr. Crepeau in 1982, the City went througk a rather lengthy study of the zoning of his property and the area in which it is loc- ated. A memorandum from Northwest Associated Consultants, dated 27 May 1985, provides a great deal of background relative to Mr. Crepeau's property. A copy of that report is enclosed for your review. The result of the study was that the City amended its Comprehensive Plan and established the C-4 zoning district to recognize existing businesses in the vicinity of the Crepeau property and establish standards to control their future. exist- ance. Subsequent to these actions by the City, Mr. Crepeau did not pursue the necessary rezoning and conditional use permits which would bring his pro- perty into conformity with the new zoning. Mr. Crepeau cites financial and health considerations as the reason he did not follow up on the matter. Based upon a complaint this Spring that the Garden Patch has expanded its operation beyond its originally approved permit, it was discovered that its 10-year permit expired this month. A letter to Mr. Crepeau, notifying A Rp<;irl,mtiRI Cnmml/nitv nn take Minnetnnka~<; South Shore . . STAFF REPORT CREPEAU MANUFACTURING 29 JUNE 1985 PAGE TWO him of the situation, has now prompted him to request the appropriate zoning for the property. The City Council has granted him a short exten- sion of his permit to operate the Garden Patch, pending receipt of his application. ISSUES AND ANALYSIS The Crepeau request is subject to the requirements of Shorewood's new Zoning Ordinance. Based upon review of the applicant's plans relative to the new Ordinance, it may be premature to make any decision on the request until further information has been submitted. However, in the interest of resolving the matter as quickly as possibly, a public hear- ing has been scheduled for 2 July 1985 to consider the information sub- mitted to-date. Following are issues to be considered in the review and evaluation of Mr. Crepeau's request: A. Rezoning. Given the City's previous study, and the current provisions of the Shorewood Comprehensive Plan, the C-4 District is considered generally acceptable for the Crepeau property. Approval of the rezon- ing should be based upon the property's compliance with the general provisions of the Ordinance and the specific requirements of the C-4 District (see Section 200.23 of the Shorewood Zoning Ordinance). B. Land Use. Three distinct uses of the property currently exist on the Crepeau site. The Gat;den Patch, whichwasor;i.ginally approved for re- tail sale of fruits and vegetables, has expanded (without the approval of the City) to include sale of plants and lawn ornaments. For the most part, these activities would fall in the categories of "conven- ience grocery" and "nursery", which are permitted uses in the C-4 District (see Section 200.23 Subd. 2). There may be some discussion as to whether the sale of lawn ornaments is typically incidental to a nursery. Since many of the Garden Patch's products are displayed outside, it requires a conditional use permit (C.U.P.) for open or outdoor sale and display subject to the conditions of Section 200.23 Subd.3c. These requirements will be reviewed in detail further on in this report. Besides the convenience grocery and nursery uses, the site contains a third use, the Crepeau dock manufacturing operation. This requires a conditional use permit under Section 200.23 Subd.3d for fabrication of wood or metal products, Subd.3b fQr open and outdoor storage and Subd.3c for outdoor display. . . STAFF REPORT CREPEAU MANUFACTURING 29 JUNE 1985 PAGE THREE C. Conditional Use Permits. Since many of the requirements for the various conditional use permits are reiterated for each activity they will be grouped together for purposes of this report. 1. Open and outdoor storage,aadd sales and display areas must be fenced and screened from view of neighboring residential uses. Although the property in question is fenced on three sides, the area of the poperty can be seen from residential areas to the south across the pond. While it is not considered necessary to fence along the pond, it should be required that landscaping be pr~vided across the rearof the site to screen the view. Landscaping will be discussed in more detail further on in this report. 2. Outdoor storage areas must be screened from view of the public right-of-way. The storage area for the dock facility can be seen quite readily from County Road 19. Landscaping is considered a solution to this issue. 3. Outdoor storage and display areas must be grassed or surfaced to control dust. The applicant's site plan (Exhibit B) does not indicate how these areas are surfaced. Most of the areas appear to be covered with a crushed rock surface, which, if properly maintained, is acceptable. 4. Landscaping must be provided for outdoor storage, sales and display areas. The site is in considerable need of landscaping, primarily as mentioned for required screening, but also for aesthetics. This is considered a key element for the approval of the conditional use permit. As such, the applicant should be required to have a professional landscape plan prepared consistent with the require- ments of Section 200.03 Subd.2g. The plan should show the arrange- ment, size, spacing and species of proposed plant materials. The Gity's approval of the applicant's request. should be subject to the acceptability of the landscape plan. Pursuant to Section 200.03 Subd.2g a bid from a certified nurseryman should be required, from which a performance bond or letter of credit should be provided for "two growing seasons. 5. Lighting must be hooded and directed away from the public right-of-way and neighboring residents. The applicant's plan does not show site lighting if any. If it exists or is proposed, it should be indicated on his site plan. . . STAFF REPORT CREPEAU MANUFACTURING 29 JUNE 1985 PAGE FOUR 6. Storage, sales and display areas shall not take up required parking space. The applicant's plans suggest a certain number of parking spaces, but neither parking or outdoor use areas are clearly defined on the plans or on the site. The site plan should define these areas, and parking should be provided based upon the following requirements: a. The curb cut or driveway access should not exceed 25 feet in width except upon approval of the City Engineer. Currently the driveway extends across the entire front of the site. The access drive(s) should be defined and located based upon the recommendation of the County Engineer. b. The parking lot must be paved and striped. Perimeter curbing must be installed around the parking lot. c. The parking lot must conform to the following setbacks: front - 15 feet, side and rear - five feet. d. The number of spaces required for the existing activities is calculated as follows: manufacturing: 1 space/350 sq. ft. of floor area (3904 sq. ft.) retail sales: 1 space/200 sq. ft. of floor area (1760 sq. ft.) 3904 + 350 = 11.2 1760 + 200 = 8.8 20.0 spaces required * * This does not include the outdoor sales area. Additional parking based on 1 space/200 sq. ft. should be provided. The applicant has indicated that 30 spaces are available. The parking layout has not been shown on his site plan. The site plan should be modified to show the parking layout. D. Future Expansion. The applicant would like to take advantage of this application to address future expansion. He proposes to add on to the rear of the Garden Patch plus build a greenhouse on the east side of the existing building (see Exhibits C and D). Mr. Crepeau also indicated that he may add an additional storage building for his dock facility at some later date. . . '" STAFF REPORT CREPEAU MANUFACTURING 29 JUNE 1985 PAGE FIVE It is considered appropriate to address further expansion at this time. The proposed additions should be shown on the site plan and evaluated for their compliance with setback and building require- ments. Additional parking must also be shown. The manager of the Garden Patch has also indicated that they would like to change the signage on the property. This is also the appropriate time to evaluate signage. For this purpose, we will need front elevations of the buildings to determine how much signage is allowed. A sign plan showing the design, size and location of existing signs should also be submitted. RECOMMENDATION Based upon the preceding, it is recommended that no decision be made until the following information can be reviewed: 1. Fully dimensioned site plan clearly defining all use areas, including, outdoor storage, sales and display, and parking. 2. Professional landscape plan. 3. Sign plan and building elevations. Since Mr. Crepeau has now made a good faith attempt to apply for the appropriate zoning and permits, the City may wish to further extend his permit to keep the Garden Patch in operating pending submission of these items. cc: Dan Vogt Glenn Froberg Jim Norton Charles Crepeau . . t l:t . :'f'::'C '. SEPT. 1982 .IATED CONSUlTANTS INC. NORTH ~ ~ ! I ~ ISLAND -. .. ..~ L .-1 ..~ _"_"_n_n_"_" -.. ..- ---. ~ . / \~ -- . Il t (GlOEaIS BAY) -!) 't\ ~ \ : s ~~..~ ~ .{ r I'~ ~dr.' I I 1\ ~< . 0 ,7"" ~~ ~ ~: II r~2d';.;; ,~~~ rr \ ~~:::::1'y f- ----. ~ _It. ~~ _.....- <II!:' .. -- 1t.1t I i~rJt" "'~\I l,~: MT '7~ .' .- , I (I 'I"" ... .. .... : :.... i ~ ,- ~~- I-- ..- ....> ..-~ I h J: jj18 I r= L,-J.- - h. fft - EXCELSIOR I' _100"- 1-lJ.L- -, . rf- ,~.~ .~ - . -i '= =rrr Ii ~,-~...\\ I ~ - I ~ k Y: .~~ .: ~l - ,~ y^\ : 1; -r:::-' ~., ,~ 1 T" I' ( ---~~ -1.._.: : '. n ~ ~ ~ ~ _, ~ 1.AItE. r-- : -..., Jr!y',i'\~ l '. T~' .~ ~. .. llld~l/). \ -u l/ J JMARY~~.......... \' -- l_'if ~ I IT'" V' J b::57 - , fdJ......; ~~~)'.i--- ~I.~l <K=!i':t;_Jr.iI7 I /' I j 1 \ '- ~ U-::~.; .f.jTIJ;, T~.E!t..L!vJ ~ ~ ...... I""-:;:!;'- -...1,-1..1 := f" --+. ~ ~ v/ Ill-- : .'1/ ~ -~ K iJ. : :.1" II l ~~ ,.= l~~:' ii ....1 " / . J,/ IJ :. 1; \~ ... :=I . <-:~----'-:'------ I n.... :=h' 'I I-~ 1 ! d -- .:1 \ \ ..\ ~ . ../::~ ~I^'- _t....I~ ~... -'1. ~ ~ -:v~ '~~ ....... _~..~':~_~.__: I 17 ~ __ ~ .....- I~ ........ ~..-.. ___. .. _... ____.....J... (...Y 7( f W 11 Exhibit A SITE LOCATION Crepeau - Rezoning and Conditional .... Use Permi t ) /\: A" "'dtll \lO>< 0::7" "'d .... ocr en .... tIlrt 1:1 o:t en t-I t-!I PJ "'d I:"' ~ . .. 0. -.- .. ... ---------.---- ~... '--~" .. . .1" '" .-.----- ---<.:..~.fn~ : :':~'.:>~:;.E--:::~:i . .;.:: ...~:--~ ._~,.. :~::; .." ,...... -..., .,,,! .....!"~i ..... ... . n.... .'._ ... ~... . . _. .. ....-- -.... - ......~.., ; -.1........: :..~......1... . ..:.. ;:. -.- 00-' ..._~,_.l..... ....... '" .....,.--.... '~"""."-'" . '" '!;::=-.::::< ..::.."t:: ... ~ ......~ .,. ......-.. '.",.' .~'. .:..~ :".,.-: ~..:::=..'"':.;-:~;::: ". .. .. ~~",: ...:.;.<:~L;'<F,..::r'~:::;:.T):~j;~t;"':.~;2~~~ ..~ .... . .. ;,:.... .., ....... . ....., ..... .... ... i- ...-.1 ........... .......t.:; .....-, <. ::~)~:.~" ;~~ :!:'..;~~~:. .:..:: ~ ~~ ~~ ::~: ~.1f ::~~.~ ~Y::~i::: ~~ :~?~;:; ::' ;~~. ~:~L~/~:' ~.: :i~;iI~t~._. :IT~ . - .-.... .. . ... . t.... ., .. .I..:~~-...... ......... ... ... .- I...... . . ..... .k.......-.. .-..... --..___..-.. __ ~...a .. ~; . .:..::. :~: ..:.... .;: ~~:.:~~:.: ~ : . :':.: .:; :..; . '.'~:-:: ...... :i;:;tIlJ:;Jt1 . .. . .. ~~...., .to... 1- ......- - ................-,-.-tj ~i.:. ~-:.. -. d'-' :-"::-:':.= ,..:. - ::....:.7::.:::::-::':":.:-:.:::1 . .. ~~ 7.:7.'J.,. 2;:,;:' ~;:.: .,.. J~.t~m:: :;'.;.: '.' .:.~.:. " .::.,.', i~;mf~ii~ .l..>.:~-t~~~;~:::~f~~~~<.~: ....... .... .... ...... .........h._..... -.. ~n --. ._~.- -, ~. ,;~.;~t' '.:: --J :. r1~~;.:,.o,:. :~~~i:~~~r~,,~ ~';;. .:" .: ,::: .;, ~~~~". .. - -~- - -:-:--:---:--. -~ -. -- ~-:""-: ~ ....-:--: ". .-:-~"-::~':-~:-r- . .. . . ... ~ . . . . ~ . .. .. . ... .. ~ :"\ -..~ l' c.. .' . ,. .. ... . '... -. .._A.... ....~ "... .. . .. . .-... . 0_'_" ..... . ......... .,'-. ....-....' .' :-: :;:r-:-.::7~----- :~ ..._....l .. _.... .______ .----__0__--_-.-- . ~.... .w ,. '~r r- - . --~.r:~- .:-'._~~- -:-;- -: ; ;-. . -:-:~::-:::-:--:-:! \ : .. \.-. --~,:- . ~\ ::.. Oi... . . .. .... . ... .. .. . ..., , ... ~:~ ~.. .;1i.:....~;~~~~ ::: .~:::..:::~ :::'::::. ~ ;~~::::. .:::: :::: ::::.; --_:..!..:...:_._---_._._....~:- .'- .--...... J~...__.__.,___.._. "'-"- CJtI ; ...___ I l ._ .~...:::..-.:.:;~~J~:...i::-1::~~-:<l::~::::: ~t:::..:.:~:. :. ~'..: ..ij1~i.}:~:kij~y~1~E~~Ett&~~:;.:;{fll~;jJ:~~t~s~~8tj, 1~.. .. .:.0.... .......... i....,.., ......--~.. ._.....,.,._--..~ .-_. -. ..... ........~ ..--.-. ...-...... ,',-".-- . . ..'_...." .....____ .'......_._~.. ._.._+..... ... ~._~. ..._... .. ......_._._ I ....._......- ," ..... ....~: . .; ..:::.~ --.-..---..---.----------....- -.- ...... + . . - ~._. ~.:..:_-~- ..:\... \:.::: :-...-::::.... .. . ..... ..... .. m ____...u - ~- --.--.---~.. .. 7.:.___.' \,. ~. :~ :\~I:~-w~;~...J~~~li!.~it~j:~:.~[.t~t~jil~r~~ ~ ~ .____.__~._..-l._.. . . I . .. .. .- ..... ----....~ ~. ...... ..- .... . . ;' .' 1:1..; :':.::'. . . -.. . - ... .. . - .. -- -:--:-:-~::- ~-: --: -:-:----. -~----:.- - -~.. -- . . .. ;- . :. .:: ; . ~~ . '. ..:': I. . . .. ~ ~J_. ...__.:.....:_~: .4 ...,. ... .... :; f.;.::: ~~:.:.:. i ... :.T..: .. . I. . : .j' .. .. . i. ,-----.- t. . . . ,... .-. f . . ... . I _:: - - . . .~ - . ... ...J. ...... ~.. . .4 CUS~M:R 7~RkiN1 -t Spoces 30 5po.ces Qfe Avo-liable. . . Il ..- p..oted;~ A""..~ &0" X IO~ ...,- Pn"'HT FCl.4:ili~ 4'" )t &fO' .1. D o t c.Ot1pre~so....s Rec.eiyi~. Holdi'!l' Pott;1l9 ArtA E 111 plo~ee Po.Y"kin~ - 5 spaces Exhibit C PROPOSED EXPANSION-PLAN VIEW 6- reenh se ~., II ",.iC ~~ ~_:,i .... ..-...--... Co.l ~iil'~:4 I'" It e.: -- . ..-...,"'....6.:.. .~. ." '-',.:- .~ .....-l-'&[.;~~. .,,~.. . ..I.:.:~~. ~:~{'~:.: t~~!~1.~' };~~;.:~,.. ;.;/.:.~,.. ~'."; .' ~ ....F ~!:; >:i:... .<i";~...:... ~~~;i:' ...... ....~:.;.~. ..:oi.:.;...~..,.~'l~~ - ". '.;~~~' .- ~." - .(' " ,. '..' .~~.~~ '.' '~J<~"i .;~ -X '.. _..... ~..iii.,.. .... x"'., . .; .' .:.:~: ~... Exhibit D PROPOSED EXPANSION-ELEVATION . . CITY OF SHOREWOOD MAYOR Robert Rascop COUNCI L Jan Haugen Tad Shaw . Kristi Stover Robert Gagne ADMINISTRATOR Daniel J. Vogt 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD . SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 . (612) 474-3236 MEMORANDUM TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: BRAD NIELSEN DATE: 22 AUGUST 1985 RE: CREPEAU - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FILE NO. 405 (85.22) This is to clarify my previous staff report dated 29 June 1985. In order to conform with the Shorewood Zoning Ordinance, elements of Mr. Crepeau's proposal require conditional use permits. Following are the pertinent sections of the Ordinance, and the requirements of each section. Comments as to how Mr. Cre- peau's proposal complies with the Ordinance are shown in italics. A. Mr. Crepeau's dock manufacturing business involves the outdoor storage of materials used in making docks (steel, lumber, etc.). Section 200.23 Subd. 3b. requires a conditional use permit for: "Open and outdoor storage as a principal or accessory use provided that: (1) The area is fenced and screened from view of neighboring resi- dential uses or if abutting an "R" District. /'fIJt.. CJt.epeau'.-j .-jt.oll.afl-e all.ea iA cwvz.en:Uy I-en.ced back. t.o -the we:I:Aand all.ea at. -th e Il.eall. 01- -th e .-j.i. t.e. A../. -thoug,h exiAil rLfI- vefl-et.ail on a../. onfl- -the we:I:Aand .-jCll.eeM -the Il.~.i.den.tia../. all.ea t.o -the .-jout.h, .i.t. hQ.-j been. Il.ecommended -th at. -th e .-j CIl.een.i. nfl- be enhanced by -th e addi. il on 0 I- e VeIl.- f}Il.een. t.Il.e~ a../.onfl- -the .-jout.h edfl-e 01- -the .-j.i.t.e. (2) Storage is screened from view from the public right-of-way. /'fill.. Cll.epeau pll.opo.-je.-j t.o move h.i..-j ex..i..-jt..i.nfl- dock. d.i..-jp../.ay .i.n /.Il.ont. 01- -the I-en.ce. Th.i..-j w.i.../.../. he../.p t.o .-jCll.een. h.i..-j .-jt.oll.afl-e Yall.d /.Il.om Count.y Road 19. Jt. ha.-j a../..-jO been. Il.ecommended -that. .-j../.at..-j be p../. aced .i.n t.he chain ../..i.nk. I-en.ce t.o enhance -the .-jCll.een.i.nfl-. A Rp<:;rl,mt;al r:ommlln;tv on Lake M;nnetonka~<; South Shore . . PLANNER'SRECGMMENDATION - CREPEAU CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 22 AUGUST 1985 (3) Storage area is grassed or surfaced to control dust. Foil. :the mO-1t. fXVZ.t. :the ex1.-1unf} Mea comp).i. e-1 wi.:th :thi.-1 ll.equi.ll.ement.. (4) Landscaping is provided in compliance with Section 200.03 Subd. 2.g. of this Ordinance. :I t. ha-1 been Il.ecommended :that. /'fill.. Cll.epeau -1ubmi. t. a pIl.ol-e-1-1i. ona1.l V pIl.efXVZ.ed lan.J:iAcape p).an -1howi.nf} :the -1i.J.e, -1peci.e-1 and -1paci.nf} 01- a1.l pIl.opo-1ed larul.-1capi.nf}. (5) All lighting shall be hooded and so directed that the light source shall not be visible from the public right-of-way or from neigh- boring residences. ~i. ven :the di.-1t.ance fA-om -1U1l.1l.ouncUnf} 1l.e-1i.dence-1 and :the 1.i.mi.t.ed amount. 01- 1.i.f}hunf} on :the -1i.t.e, :thi.-1 pIl.ovi.-1i.on i.-1 not. con-1i.dell.ed t.o be an i. -1-1ue. (6) Storage area does not take up parking space as required for con- formity to this Ordinance. :II- :the fXl/UUnf} lot. lClflout. -1hown on cxhi.bi.t. A, at.t.ached, i.-1 i.mp).e- ment.ed., fXVZ.ki.nf} wi.ll complv wi.:th :the Oll.di.nance. No out.dooll. -1t.oll.af}e -1hou1.d be a1.lowed i.n :the tA-ont. 01- :the -1i.t.e. (7) The provisions of Section 200.04, Subd. 1.d. (1) of this Ordi- nance are considered and satisfactorily met." The-1e Me :the f}enell.a1. CIl.i.t.wa I-Oll. a1.l condi.uona1. U-1e pell.mi.t.-1. Such :thi.nf}-1 a-1 comp).i.ance wi.:th ex1.-1unf} po1.i.ci.e-1, con-1i.-1t.enqj wi.:th :the Compll.ehen-1i. ve Plan, comPat.i.bi.li.t.V wi.:th pIl.e-1ent. and f-u;twz.e land U-1e-1, al-I-ect. on land va1.Ue-1 and capaci.t.V 01- Ci.:l:.fI -1e1l.vi.Ce-1 -1hou1.d a1.l be con-1i.dell.ed i.n eva1.uatJ.nf} :the ll.eque-1t.. B. The dock business displays one of its products in front of the building. The Garden Patch proposes to remove much of its outdoor display area and build a new greenhouse on the east side of their existing building. They have proposed a 10 foot open display in front of their building. Section 200.23 Subd. 3c. requires a conditional use permit for: "Open or outdoor service, sale, rental, and display as a principal or accessory use provided that: (1) Outside sales areas are fenced or screened from view of neighboring residential uses or an abutting "R" District. NeJ.:thell. :the dock di.-1play (PG/1.ucu1.G/1.lV al-t.eIl. i.t.' -1 moved) noll. :the pll.O- po-1ed ~aIl.den Pat.ch di.-1plav G/1.ea Me cOn-1i.dell.ed t.o be wi.t.hi.n vi.ew of'- 1l.e-1i. dentJ. a1. pll.O pell.t.V. -2- " PLANNER'S RECOMME~lION CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 22 AUGUST 1985 . - CREPEAU (2) Landscaping is provided in compliance with Section 200.03, Subd. 2 g. of this Ordinance. Jt hCM been Il.ec.omrneruied. i:.hat f'rlll.. Cll.epeau ~ubmi..i:. a pIl.ol-~~i..OnaA.l.!J pIl.e~ed. l.arI.li4cape Plan ~howi..nf), i:.he ~i..J.e, ~peci.~ arui ~paci.nf), 01- al.l. pIl.O po~ ed. l. arI.li4 caPi.. nf),. (3) All lighting shall be hooded and so directed that the light source shall not be visible from the public right-of-way or from neighboring residences. [;i.. ven i:.he diAtance f.Il.om ~UIl.Il.oun.di.nf), Il.~i..denc~ arui i:.he 1.i.mi..i:.ed. amount 01- l..i.f),hting. on i:.he ~i.te, i:.hi..~ pIl.ovi..~i.on .i.~ noi:. coMi..dell.ed. to be an i..~~ue. (4) Sales area is grassed or surfaced to control dust. Foil. i:.h e mo~i:. paIl.i:. i:.h e ex.i. ~1:-i..nf), all.ea com Pl i. ~ wi. i:.h i:.hi.. ~ ll.equi.ll.ement. (5) The use does not take up parking space as required for conformity to this Ordinance. JI- i:.he pa.;t.k.i..nf), l.ot l.ay.out ~hown on exhi.bi..t A, attached., .{~ i..mPlemented., pa.;t.k.i.nf), wi..l.l. comPl!J wi..i:.h i:.he Oll.di.nance. (6) The provisions of Section 200.04, Subd. 1.d (1) of this Ordinance are considered and satisfactorily met." Th~e all.e i:.he f),enell.al. CIl.i..i:.eIl.i..a 1-011.. al.l. conditional. ~e pell.mi..t~. Such i:.hi..n~ CM comPli..ance wi.i:.h ex.i.~tinf), po1.i..ci.~, coMi..~tency wi..i:.h i:.he Compll.eheMi..ve 7>l.an, compati.bi..1.i..:f:.!J wi..i:.h pIl.~ent arui ~e l.arui ~~, al-I-ea on l.arui val.u~ and capaci.:f:.!J 01- Ci..i:.!J ~eIl.vi..c~ ~hou1.d aD be coMi..dell.ed. i..n eVal.uati..nf), i:.he Il.equ~t. C. The dock manufacturing business itself requires a conditional use permit as provided in Section 200.23 Subd. 3d.: "Fabrication (cutting, assembly and/or welding) of wood or metal products only when accessory to an activity allowed as a permitted use or condi- tional use within this Section, provided that: (1) Any outside storage shall be in compliance with b. of this Subdivi- sion. See Sec.ti..on A 01- i:.hi..~ Il.epoll.t. -)- . . .' PLANNER'S RECOMMENDATION - CREPEAU CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 22 AUGUST 1985 (2) Adequate off-street parking and off-street loading is provided in compliance with the requirements of Section 200.03, Subd. 5 of this Ordinance. Jf. :the pa;z.k.i.ng. -lo:t -lay..ou:t aUached. GA cxhi.bi.:t A of. :thi.4 llepoJt:t i.4 i.mpl.emen:ted., :thi.4 4ewon of. :the Olldi.nance 4hal-l be 4W4{.i.ed.. Mil. Cllepeau.' 4 aUollney hGA advi.4ed. me :that :they wi.-l-l appl.y f.OIl a val7.i.ance Ilel.wve :to :the pavi.ng., CU/l.bi.ng. and 4:t17.i.pi.ng. of. :the PMk,i.ng. -lo:t. (3) Provisions are made to control and reduce noise: ~i. ven :the 4WZ/Loun.di.ng. -land Me4 and :the we:t-land aIlea :to :the 40uth, noi.4e i.4 no:t con4i.del7.ed :to be a fJIlob-lem. To my know-led.g.e we have no:t Ilecei. ved any comp-lai.n:t4 Ilel.w ve :to noi.4e. (l.) The provisions of Section 200.04, Subd. l.d. (1) of this Ordinance are considered and satisfactorily met." The4e aile :the g.enel7.al CIli.:tel7.i.a f.OIl al-l condi.:ti.onal Me pellmi.:t4. Such :thi.nf)-4 GA compl.i.ance wi.:th exi.4:ti.ng. po-li.ci.e4, COn4i.4:tency wi.:th :the ComplleheMi.ve 'P-lan, compa;ti.bi.-li.:ty wi.:th fJIle4en:t and f.u;tuIle -land Me4, af.f.ec:t on -land valUe4 and capaci.:ty of. Ci.:ty 4e17.vi.Ce4 4hou-ld al-l be con4i.del7.ed i.n evaluwng. :the lleque4:t. D. In talking with Mr. Crepeau's attorney it apparently was not clear that the applicant needs to submit additional information relative to signage (building elevations and existing signage). Consequently the analysis of signage is not completed as of this writing. Presumably, the information will be here in time for the next Council meeting. Once you have reviewed the specific provisions detailed herein, you have the following options: 1. Deny the request in its entirety. 2. Approve any or all of the three required conditional use permits as recom- mended by the Planning Commission. 3. Approve any or all of the three required conditional use permits, making modifications to the recommendation of the Planning Commission. If there are any questions relative to the request or this report, please contact my office prior to Monday. cc: Dan Vogt Glenn Froberg Jim Norton Charles Crepeau Nancy Arnison -4- , t . ". . r-~-~--~----~-~-- .. I ... I ..l -- I \. po. ~ ... I -- , \\. ... , --- ... -- '" ... j -- .. .... -- .., i ... -- .... , . -- \ = -- ~1 _.. ... __4 _ __. ---- ~ } -, ............ Exhibit Po. SUGGESTED AL1'.:mNATIVE pA:.UaUa LOT LAYCL'1' . . MAYOR Robert Rascop COUNCIL Jan Haugen Kristi Stover Robert Gagne .. Barb Brancel ADMINISTRATOR Daniel J. Vogt CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD . SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 · (612) 474-3236 MEMORANDUM TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: BRAD NIELSEN DATE: 9 MARCH 1988 RE: OUTLOT A. GWK ADDITION FILE NO.: 405 (87. 19) Mr. Thomas Wickenheiser has requested final approval of the above-referenced plat. He received preliminary plat approval on 11 May 1987 subject to a number of conditions. To date we have not received a final plat for the proposed division. Section 1202.04 Subd. 1 a. of the Shorewood City Code requires that a developer submit the final plat within six months of preliminary plat approval. Failure to do so voids preliminary plat approval. Consequently Mr. Wickenheiser's approval expired on 11 November 1987. It is the recommendation of the staff that the applicant be directed to reapply for a preliminary plat pursuant to the Shorewood Subdivision Ordinance. BJN:ph cc: Dan V.ogt Glenn Froberg Jim Norton Thomas Wickenheiser A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore /1 COLDWEll BANKER RESIDENTIAL REAL ESTATE 17601 HIGHWAY 7 MINNETONKA. MN 55345 (612) 474-0836 . . A _R Of THE SEARS FINANCIAL NETWORK ~ - Feb. 25, 1988 To: City of Shorf'Wood, Dan Vogt Re: OUTLOT A, GWK ADDITlrn On April 29, 1987 we presented to the Planning Commission, the attached sub-division into two lots, and received preliminary approval. Would you kindly schedule us for the next Council meeting, so that we can get final approval, and then deliver the final survey, abstract, and whatever else is needed. We are taking irad Nielsen's advice qnd using his Exhibit C (all paperwork attached). Thank you for your cooperation, /t:-Q i.~-~ · 'lbomas .t::kenheiSer. for GVJK PROFERTlE S , ., . . CITY OF SHOREWOOD MAYOR Robert Rascop COUNCil Jan Haugen Kristi Stover Robert Gagne aarb Brancel AOMINISTRA TOR Oaniel J. Vogt 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD . SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 . (6121 474.3236 MEMORANDUM TO: ~1._Il1GcatMISSION, MAYOR AND CITt COUNCIL FROM: BRAD NIELSEN DATE:.'MaiL_7 RE: OUTLOT A, GWlC ADDITION - PRELIMINARY PLAT FILE NO.: 405 (87.19) \ ~ BACKGROUND _ Mr. Thomas Wickenheiser has requested approval of a preliminary plat for Outlot A, GWK Addition. The property contains approx;i..mately 2.6 acres' and is . located at the east end of Wiltsey Lane, north of State Highway 7 (see site Location map - ~~i lt B, attached). As can be seen on Exhibit B, the applicant proposes _ 0 divide the property into two lots. I , . , The property is currently zoned R-1C, as is all the property to the north, east and west~;tsurrounding land uses include single-family residential to the north ~n~ast and a vacant lot to the west. .... ANALYSIS/RECOMMENDATION The proposed division is considered poorly designed and, given the zoning of the site, an inefficient use of land. It's apparent that the applicant wants' to avoid the costs of extending the street and utilities into the site. While this is not the City's concern, the City must be concerned with lot configuration and potential future resubdivision of the lots. While nothing can be done about the irregular border of the property formed by the Highway 7 r.o.w., the location of the proposed division line results in an odd-shaped buildable area for Lot 2. This will necessitate an excessively long driveway and sewer service for Lot 2. A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonks's South Shore '. Re: Outlot A. GWK Add. 29 April 1987 . The lots are substantially larger than the required 20.000 square foot minimum for the R-1C district. The concern here is that some future owner will come back at a later date wanting to resubdivide one of the lots. It is recommended that the lot line be straightened out as shown on Exhibit C. Not only will the lot lines conform with the topography of the site. but the buildable area of the lot is closer to the street and sewer service~ Furthermore. if Lot 2 is made to be 50 feet wide at Wiltsey Lane. adequate access can be provided for future resUbdivision. Kegardless of whether the City approves the request as submitted or the recommended alternative it is recommended that the Council's resolution specify that it is not the intent of this Council for the property to be resUbdivided. Also. whichever layout is approved. the following conditions should be imposed: 1. The final plat must include 10 foot drainage and utility easements along each side of each side and rear lot line. 2. The applicant must submit an up-to-date (within 30 days of final plat approval) title opinion for review by the City Attorney. 3. Prior to release of the final plat. the applicant must pay $500 per lot in park dedication fees. BJN:ph cc: Dan Vogt Glenn Froberg Jim Norton Tom Wickenheiser - 2 - . , , 'p-- I I Exhibit A SITE LOCATION Wickenheiser - simple subdivision r '- . . . . ~ ~- -~ . . . ... . , WILTSEY ..', '. I' . Prop~s.d SubdIvisIon ror ro. Wlc~.nh.I'.r . or Outlot. A, aWl ADDItiON Hennepin Count.l, Mlnnesot.1 ..........: , .. ... -- " - ... "r_ ...... .. " ,: , , .... , , , ... ~c.. ... , """'1 ',. ..~ ....'\r'- ~I '\ " , ...,., --- .~ ......' t'.....3....'....!o..... ...:> --. ~&L- -' /1 "'" ~ ....' .... ...----- '\ ./ / --... ~ ~~" """~650 WILTSEY" \. 4-;~..(, '\\ ~ ~ \...<',. \ ~E '\/ <~ ] /1:, " ~ ~- ---I '\ \ ", \<...,,.:~.,,.. /~/ ......\. ^ i. I \ ~ ~ " ...., \ )1/1 \ /'~ V ~ !oo ... ~ ' ", .... \'1 ~ \i .. , ", .... ........ \ '---) ""~'... '....--~ - ___~oo \In,.rr~ \'k f'"",-- ' ~\ :: "'k.. \,~ .....~... ~ - ,.,.____...__1J:NE....:._ ........ "1 \ ~ ' , " ,..... -IF,__ .....", , ...... ~.. ----, \ \ " ;'---~ I "L"~"'" ;,/'-....,:: _--:."......'" '\ \j \ 1 ~'\.."'" , )1[.. -",". \ I ~ " _.. ""~.~", 4l'... ~ ........... '. ',"', fo. e..- -~. ", ""..... ~'\. 1 '" T At.tE :', ..' ......... ",. ............ "',:'" ' \" , \ " UUl'..... '..-:.._ _______... 'q...', ..... ~", .. ... .. ..."......." , '" 'Il , ~'I --- -- ~ ~~~~\ ....'1 '", '~'''''''~ ..._-... , "'/ ------.. '>.., ,""..., ......., '" . 1\(1......-_ ___ ......,,, ,', .., ~~, ' I ' . ,,_ - -- -.:::.... ......'.......... :-.',' \" l '.. ........, ...... ,,'---- '(' --- -- - ~ ..., ' ... \' ..., , ., ,.. "'I'r, , -'r, "', '-'-':", \I '"" .........' .', 1\ --- .~', ~ I , ,_-tll:;_<;:,~,~ ,:,0", '~, ~ 'l!~ .~. ';: " ' " ..._.....- " "..'..\..:......------, "~';" ,\\\,~ ra'llo:(.,.. ", - , ,~-.:: ---------- I:I~ ~I\ \ , ~ ~ '-- --- '.....'-..........._~;;;.==-------=----' \ \ \" ." ... .. - - - _~ - . 11'''::--;';:;: _ "'- p.... \ I ''\ ~ ,~.I.. ......... _ __.. - --.... ...._-.:. --':::::;:"- __.... -..," I J '"".... --__...___-----:i==--.--:.....--=-===:.::.o:.tl",.,'" ,', ' ' _..__ __ -:.- __",.... -__.....____-::=__-----,1 , ".".,',~'..., 5T/'T-""'Wt ----_ --------- , ...' 11141'... ,., c; H'-G-H- - --__ __ - ~ -- - I " '" ....... - - - ~ . - ~ lV.A.Y. A/- - - - - - - - - - "...... ...... , ---- ---1.:1'.0.._ ~ ............ ...-:..__-_---- ',.... , ---------...- - -- --- \ - - - - -..._~::=:.- '. E_ISTING DESCRIPTIO" Outlot. A. GWK ADDITION t,,"'blt C S1J8HSTED ALTERNATIVE COffiN & GRONBERG, INC. Englneers,.Llnd SurvelorS, Plann.rs Long Like, Mlnn.sot.1 ..~~ '. .!i \ .1. -: tf ~ J .\ . .. . MAR - 7tL ORR-SCHELEN-MA YERON & ASSOCIATES, INC. 2021 E. HENNEPIN AVE. · SUITE 238 MINNEAPOLIS, MINN. 55413 CHANGE ORDER NO. ..... J. . . . . .. . . $ 314.34 (DEDUCT) $. . 4-9,.Q~2...6g. '('ADfl' A & K Construction, INc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ., Contractor 9038 110th Street North RE: . ~r~.~ ~ . ~~'.. ~~.~ ~C .. ~ ~ .. .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. Stillwater, MN 55082 .............................................................................................. .. Dear Sir (5) Under your contract dated ....... ..~~.r. ?~? .. . . . . . .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. . . .. .. .... 19. eJ. with City of Shorewood, Minnesota Southeast . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ., . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. Owner for ............. area pumphouse and appurtenant work. .................................................................................................................................................................................... .. we are authorized by the owner to hereby direct you to .. (SU: .l'JIACI:t:E.D) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ...................................................................................................................................... ............................................. .................................... ......................................................................................................................... ...................... ........................................................................................... . ........................................................................................... . ........................................................................................... . ad to ... to (deduct from) the contract, In accordance with contract and speclftcatloa, the IUJIl of . . . . . . . . (Add} . for.ty~n.i.ne. thausand . th.l.'.r.ty.-:two..aod.. . .. .. .... ........ ..681 100 Dollars (Deduct) Three hundred seventy-four and. 34/100 Dollars There wlll be an extension of .............. days for completion. The date of completion of coatract was ....... 19.... and now wlll be .......... 18 ...... , Amount of orlglna' contract Tota' Additions Total Deductions Contract to Date $168,501.00 $49,032.68 $374.34 $217,159.34 Approved .......................... 19.... Respectfully Submitted, .............................. ............. ORR-SCHELEN-MA YERON & ASSOCIATES, INC. Per J~NOf~.!l:r""""" City of Shorewood Owner Approved .......................... 18.... .. .... ........ ...... ...... ...... ..... ...... A & K Construction, Inc. Contractor /71/ .. ~. . . CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 SOUTHEAST AREA PUMPHOUSE AND APPURTENANT WORK PROJECT NO. 86-1C FOR THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA lIST OF QUANTITIES TOTAL PRICE 1639.90 245.99 925.23 700.00 243.78 368.69 55.30 DEDUCT <125.00> ITEM NO. ITEM 1 Change the head, provide flange adapter, and change motor std. 16 1/2" BD to 20" BD 15% overhead and margin 2 Base plate w/anchor bolts, nuts w/template. Adjust the casing height. 15% overhead and margin 3 S.S. Collets and bolts 15% overhead and margin Galvanized cone strainer 4 Hydro-Pneumatic System for S.E. Sub-contractors & Suppliers Hollenback & Nelson Lesters Bldg. Systems Truck Crane Service Wheeler Tank Manu. Co. The Prest Co. Pump house 2280.00 7425.00 441.00 5551.00 11102.44 5227.13 1035.12 2540.00 5340.25 37.50 158.75 29.44 502.44 DEDUCT <249.34> 8 hrs. @ 31.75/hr. 254.00 76.07 7 Clear and grub trees and brush Haul two (2) loads of brush and trees from site A top notch tree service 2 loads @ 325.00/load 650.00 - Concrete Slab - Metal Building - Set hydro tank - Hydro Pneumatic Tank - Aquatrol Tank Control & Quincy 5hp compresso Pierson Wilcox Elec. Co. - Electric work for Hydro System and Appurt. valves Pipe, fittings, Labor 15% overhead and margin 80 hrs. @ 31.75/hr. 5 Water piping on chemical feed pump to 1" Ball valve 1" Schedule 80 PVC pipe Labor relieve air problem 1 Ea. 6 L.F. 5 h rs . 6 15% overhead and margin Replace 2" APCO air & vacuum valve w/3" 3" APCO #146 WDT air & vacuum valve Credit for 2" returned Labor to install 15% overhead and margin . ~ . ~ . . Labor for two (2) men w/chain saws to clear trees and brush 5 hours 15% overhead and margin 580.00 18(.W 8 Extra labor and material required to hook up chemical feed equiPment. Pierson Wilcox Electric Co. 890.00 15% overhead and margin for prime contractor 133.63 9 Limit switch on Golden Anderson check valve. Work by Peirson Wilcox Electric Co. 15% overhead and margin TOTAL TOTAL 185.50 175.00 54.08 ADD ~49,032.68 DEDUCT $ 374.34 :> . QS\1. =& Associates, Inc. 2021 East Hennepin Avenue Minneapolis. MN 55413 612-331-8660 FAX 331-3806 . Engineers Surveyors Planners M.A.R - 4 1988 Mirch 2, 1988 City ot Shorewood 5755 Country Club Road Shor.wooo, Minnesota 55331 R. 50uth~a2t Ar.a ~urnpnUu)r and Appurtenant Work ProJect No. 86-1C OSH C~. No. 3707.50 Ci ty Counc tl : Enclosed are four (4) copIes ot Construction Payraent Voucher No. 4 on the .stlove r~tHHlct'd project 'n the li.'llou.H ut . 50283.84. Pluse raalii.' pa,rlent In illlount of' 5l!~b3.84 to H & K (onstructilon, Inc., ,u38 - l:Ctn St. tic.., ~t:llw.sll!r, M,r.r,'50ta 55082 at your earliest convenltnce. Very trull fUurs, ORR-5CHtLtN-MH1EkON & ASSOCIATES, tNC. ~~~,P.1~ PrOJfct Engineer JPN:RGO Enclosures (( : 11 & K Construction, iliCo /7b; . CONSTRUCTION PAYMENT VOUCH~ Est..ate Voucher No. 4 Datt March 2, 1988 For P.rlOd Ending F.bruary 20, 1988 PrOJfct NUlb.r Bo-1C tins of Work Pu.PhouS' and appurt.nant work Location To : A & K Construction, Inc. ------------------------------------------------------ 9038 - II0th St. No. Southfast Ar.a Stillwatfr, Minnfsota 55082 ------------------------------------------------------ (612) 426-1613 City of ShorfWood, Hfnnepin County, Minn.sota for A. Original Contract Amount . 16b50 1. 00 B. Total Additions . 49032.0& e.o. .1 C. Total D.ductions s 374.34 L.O. II D. Total Funds ~ncumbered . 217159.34 ~. Total Valu. of WorK C.rtlfled to Date s 196220.11 F. Less R.talned Perc.ntage 5 i; $ 9811.01 6. LfSS Total PrevIous P.~fnts i 136125.26 H. Approv.d for Pa~.nt, ThiS Report s 50283.84 I. Total PaYl.nts Including ThiS VouCher $ 186409.10 J. Balance Carrl.d Forward s 30750. ':4 AfPRWALS ----------- --- ...._--- ...------ ------------------------- - ...---------.. .---.....-------..---- --- ---.------.-.--------------------- - ------------------------------- ---------- O"f(-SlHELEr~'"Wi(ERtJ.j & AS50CIATtS, INC. Pursuant to our fl.ld observation, as performed In accordanc~ wIth our contrac~, we hereby certify that t~r ~aler!'ls are satisfactory and the work propHly pertor/led In dCcordance with the ~i14rls.nd spfCiflcatlons and that the total work IS ~O ',~ complehd as Ot FeDruafl 20, 19a& . ~je nHet!y reclDllend pa1l'.nt of thiS voucrlff. Signed __u____________ _m_______u_u______u_______ 5, goed : '. i) VI .....-=1:--- ____;;;:;;;;;;;;_;;:;;;;;_______________ ~-~~""-----,-~~~:--,:~J------ ThIS IS to certth that to the best of fI~ ilr.Jwiedge, ,oformatl()l1, dr,Ll belief, the qUilrddles ane! vQ:~e5 of worio. certltlfd herein IS a tillr approxlmat. est,llldte tor tile period covered b:' H'IS Iloucher. Con triC tor A' K Construction, Inc. Signed /:iy ------------------------------------------------- Date : lit Ie ------------------------------------------------------------- (,I;, of Shor'ewood t1pproved tor Paylllent VOUCher ------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------- Check.d B, ~utllor lIed Representatlv, D.te Date Page 1 of 3 ;;7lii' .50 . . Oat. : Harcb 2, 1988 Contractor: A & K Construction, Inc. 90ae - 110th St.-No. Stlllwatrr, MInnesota 550el ~612) 426-1613 Esti.ate Voucher No. 4 Southeast Area Pumphouse and Appurtenant Work PrOJect No. 86-1C for tile CIty of Shor,wood, Hennepin County, Minnesota Contuct Date. : May 28, 1987 ~k COIpleted : WllrM iJtarted : June 17, 1987 CIlIP I et I on Date It III No. Contrac t Quantity UnIt Unit Prlcerotal Price lttll Work (llIp I. Ie d Tbls AIIount Total to Date Month ThiS Month Quantity Total Price .--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- '" SCHEDULE "A" for Ihe clllp!ete construction ot the S.E. Area ~u~phouse and appurtenant worK as sbown on the plans or Included In the specltlcatlons (except for the unit price IteRs) for the lump SWl aRount Cost Breakdown I) 80nd 2) Misc. Rock, WOOd Chips 3) Bldg. Excau. & Backfill 4) Concrete & Masonry 5) Precast 6) Carpentry 7) Doors & Hawe., Wlnd~s 8) Painting 9) louuers & Damprrs 10./ Well PuRp 11) Pipe, Fittings & Vdlve~ l2J f I ow lie ter. lJ./ Floor Drains, Pldy. & Piping 14) Golden Anoerson Coeck Vaiv, 15) CheRleal Feed System 16) Ehctr Icai 3500.00 1000.00 1700.00 10885.00 23J8.00 8790.00 3070.00 3025.00 1500.00 15000.00 6000.00 USO.OO 14:i7.00 845iJ.00 I24BO .00 aOD .00 ------------ Total )chedu I e .~t! ..., . ",".1. ... . . I I. , . ,.i 102358.1l0 SCHEOULE "B" <01, COMon ttcdvdlfon ~OlJ C. i. J..j() 2luu .iJO (02) Granu lar Borrow 300 C.Y. 6.UO leoo.oo (03) Heflove All EAI~tlng DebriS from PreVIvUS Deep We II Cons truc II on 1 loS. 100U.uO 1l)OU .UU (04) Class S 100h Crushed 100 TON 15.uO 1500.00 <OS) .2331 BI tumlnous Base C our s.. 130 Tlli 33.00 42iO.OO (06) 112341 &1 tUIDIOOUS Wrar Cc.urs.. 05 Hri 45.00 ~Y.::.OO (07) 12357 Bituminous Tack Coat 4;) GA- o.tJlJ 24U.00 L. (0&) 8618 Loncrete Curb and butter 4~u L.F. 8.0U 3360.00 (09) 6" COflcrete walk ~o4 S.F. 2.0(; 52 Q . 00 (10) 12" DIP Class 50 W,t"r Main iU L.f. Le.UU 234U .00 (It) 12" 8.F. Gate Valve and Box I EA. 7~lJ .00 750.00 (12) 6" Gate Valve and Box L CA. J7S.0u 7St! .00 (13) 0" DIP Class 52 Water Ndln i2li L.F. I? . u~, .:040.00 (14) fittings i100 LBS. i .! U ILl.) .00 (5) Pipe 8eddlng 3/4" Clear 65 1(i~ IO.uu 650.00 Pal)t 2 of 3 3707.50 0 0.00 3500.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 1700.00 0 0.00 10885.00 0 0.00 2338.00 0 0.00 &790.00 0 0.00 3070.00 0 0.00 O.uO 0 0.00 1500.0c 0 0.00 15uO 0 . uil 0 0.00 6i!Uli .00 U 0.00 I; 50 .u:; 0 0.00 1437.-0 0 0.00 &450.0\) 0 0.00 1~460.0tl .4 Btl1J.20 2~lIJJ .uu ------------ ------------ , 0813.20 , '1'8jj3.Uv 0 0.00 1540 40~i!.uO 0 0.00 279.7 167B.LU U 0.00 I 1 UUl). Uti (l 0.00 225.05 3384. ?':l 0 0.00 140 k~li .J\! U O.Ou . .j 2 7'L1 . \.; I., ,,~ tl iI.OO 40 .'4[1.UO 0 0.00 jyCl 31d4.iJiJ U O.uo 2.:.4 52B.lltJ 0 a.Uo 90 L34u .UJ 0 O.uO 1 JS.:'.OO 0 0.00 2 75u.00 0 0.00 12U 204U.LitJ tl 0..00 1100 l~lti.uO U 0.00 16.84 108.40 . . . Est.mate Voucher No. 4 March 2, 1988 Contractor : A & K Construction, Inc. 9038 - 110th St. No. Sttll~ater, Minnesota 55082 (612) 426-1613 Oat. : Southeast Area PWlphous. and Appurt.nant WorK Proj.ct No. 86-le for the City ot Shor~ood, Htnn.pin County, Minn.sota It III No. It ,/1 Con tract Quantity Unit Unit Price Total Prlc, Work Cmpl.t.d ThiS Amount Total to Oat. Month Th., Nonth Quantity Total Prlct ----------------------------------------------------------------------------~-----------------------------------------.---------.- (6) Fir. Hydrant I EA. 950.0u 950.00 <17' 0" DIP Class 52 Sanitary S~er 220 L.F. 18.00 3960.00 (18) 8' Std Nanhol. wI tasting and Cov.r 2 EA. 1000.00 2000.00 (19) Manhol. Extra D.pth 10 L.F. ao.oo 800.00 (20) 4" DiP Class 52 Drain lint 90 L.F. 16.00 1440.UO (21) Dry W.II Nanhol. ~ Bas. and Casting I Cover 1 EA. 1400.iJO 1400.00 (22) 1-112" Char Crushed Drain Rock 10 TCr~ 10.00 100.00 (23) Sod Incl. 4" of Black Dirt 1100 S.Y. 2.50 VSO .00 (24) Se.d Incl. 4" of BlacK Dirt 1 AC. 5000.00 5000.00 (25) ked T~ls Oo~oodShrub 13 tA. 30.00 390.00 (26) AmerIcan Cranb.rry VIburnum Shrub 10 EA. 30.00 300 .00 (27) Harshall's Ash Tr.es 7 EA. 250.00 1750.00 (28) Llttl. leaf Lind.n Tre.s 3 EA. 250.00 750.00 (29) R.d Splender Crab Apple Tre.s 2 EA. 100.00 200.0u (30) Servlceb.rry A/ltlanchltr Canaden~li Tr~rs 2 EA. 85.00 170.00 (31) Timber Retaining Wall (Per ElpOStd Surtacf 2500 S.F. 7.00 17500.00 (32) Erosion Control 600 L.F. 1.00 600 .00 ------------ Tot41 at Schedule !tBII. .. "' .. " .... . ... I ... ,i 66143.00 ------------ ------- Total ot Schedule "A' . "8'. .......... ...........i 10&50 J .00 Cllang. Or dff No. 1 HDO 45'032. is DEDUCT 374.34 -------_._- ------- Total to Oate....................................i 217159.34 Page 3 of 3 3707.5u o o o " 0 o 0.00 .0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 U 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 40 280 .00 0 0.00 ------------ i 2&0.Ou ---------- ---- i 9093.20 48243.76 t 573J6. 96 1 220 2 3 90 950.uO 3900.00 2000.00 24u.00 144U.OO 14uO.&6 iI.UU O.cO il.ilO 13 3'i0 .00 10 300.00 7 1750 .00 3 750.0n 2 200.UO I. llu .Oll 970 67>,0.uO O.Oil i 4vo4:.i.J1 ----------- --- i 147976.35 4bL43. :,~ -------.-.-- ------- i 196.:2J.lI . . ellange Order No. Oil. : Harch 2, 1988 Contractor: A & K Construction, Inc. 9038 - 110th St. No. Stlll~iter, Minn.sota 55082 (612) 426-1613 ;, Soutbeast Area Pumphouse and Appurtenant Work PrOJect No. 86-le' for the . City of Shorewood, HennepIn County, Hlnnesota It.. No. 1) - 2) - 3) - UtA Con trac t Juantlty Unit Unit Price Total Price Work COItpletrd ThIs Alount Tot.1 to Dale Honth This Honth Quantity Totai Prlc, Chang. the head, pro~ldt flang. adapter, and change ~otor frOlt std. 16 1/2' BD to 20' BD 1639.90 1639.90 1639.9U 1~1. ov.rhead and ~argln 245.99 245.99 ~45.99 Base plate wlanchor bolts, nuts WI t.~plat.. 925.23 925.23 ~25.23 AdJust the casing hflght. ' 700.00 700.00 700 .00 1~{ overhead and ~argln 243.78 243.78 243.78 5.S. Collets & Bolts 368.69 368.69 368.69 1~1. o~erh.ad and ~argin 55.30 55.30 55.30 Galvanized Coft. strainer DELETE 125.0B} 125.GO} 125.00 } 4) - Hydro-Pneumatic Syst.R for S.E. Pumphouse Sub-contractors & Suppl I.rs Hollenback & Nelson Concrete Slab 2280.00 2280.00 22aO .00 . Lesters Bldg. Systms Netal Bu,ldlng 7425.00 7425.00 74l5.iJG Truck Cran. Service S.t Hydro Tank 441.00 441.00 441.0U Wheeler Tank Hanufacturlng, Co.- Hydro Pneumatic TanK 5551.06 5551 .06 5551.06 The Prest Co. Hquatrol Tank Control Ie & QUincy 5 Hp COItpresso 11102.44 11102.44 11102.44 Pierson wilcox ElectriC Co. - Electrical work for Hydro Sy~te~ & Appur I. 5L~7.13 5227.13 52.'/ ,l j. Pipe, fittings, Val~fS 1035.12 1035.12 Iuj',j; ~ Labor dO Hrs 31. 75 2540.00 80 2540.00 80 ~~4(;.u0 151. ~erhfad and .argln 5340.25 5340.25 5340.25 5) - bJ - Water piping on Chenllcal Feed P~p te relieve air problem. I" Ball Valve I' SChedule ao PUC Pipe labor I Ea. o L.f. 5 !irs. 31.50 37.50 j,: .:.u ISlU5 158.75 J:'o .:. J 29 .44 29.44 29 .44 :'U2.44 5112.44 Su. ,,14 24'T,j41 i 24".34.; ~-!1.j4 254.00 8 254.00 a 254.liO h.u7 76.i)7 76.07 15% o~ernedd dn~ margin Replace 2' ",PCO Hlr & Vacuum 'Jalve \II' 3. 3" HPl~ .140 wuT Air & Vacuun Valve Credit for 2' returhed Labor to Inslall 15% ~erhead and .arg:n DH)uCT I:l Hrs. ll.75 ]) - Clear and grub trees and brusn Haul two (2) loads of brush and tree~ trOOl ';1 te. A Top Notch Tree Servlc' 2 Loads oSO.OO 650.00 2 ~JU. uli 325.00 labor for two (2) men ~' cnaln )aws to clear trees and brush 15% ov.rhead and margin 5 Hrs. 560.00 llH .50 580.00 184.50 sao .00 1&4.5' .. .... . . Cllin9f Order No. o.t. : M..rch 2, 1988 Contr..ctor : A & K Construction, Inc. 9U38 - IIOth St. ,No. Stillwater, Minnesota 55082 (612) 426-1613 South.ast Area P~phouse and Appurtenant Work PrOJ.ct No. 8o-1e for the Clt~ ot Shortwood, Hennepin County, Minnesota It.. No. Ittll Con trac t Quantity Unit Unit Price 10tal Price work CCllp I e ted This Foount Total to (.late Honth This Month Quantity Total Price ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 8) - Extra labor and naterial required to hook up Chtlllcal Feed fqulpnent. Pierson Wilcox ElectriC Co. 1~1. overhead and nargln tor prine con trac tor. 9) - Llnlt SWitch on Golden Anderson check vdlve. Work by Pierson Wilcox Electrical Co. 15% overhead and mdrgln 890.88 890.88 890.88 133.63 133.63 133.63 185.50 175.00 54.0& --------- -------- ----------- ----- _______ w. ___ ------- Tot.1 ................................ I' 48658.34 t 48243.76 $ 4824j.lo Page 2 ot 2 3707.50 · Q\'\1. 5=", · 2021 East Hennepin Avenue Minneapolis, MN 55413 612-331-8660 FAX 331-3806 Engineers Surveyors Planners February 22, 1988 City of Shorewood 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, MN 55331 ATTN: Mr. Dan Vogt City Administrator RE: S.E. Area Water System Pressure Reducing Valves OSH Commission No. 3707.52 Dear Dan: As we have discussed in the past, there will be a need for pressure reducing valves in part of the S.E. area water system. The need for pressure reducing valves is due to the significant relief that occurs in this area. Some homes are at or near elevation 900, while others are as high as 1060. The difference in elevation alone between a home at elevation 1060 and a home at elevation 900 is 160 feet. This relates to a static differential pressure of 70 p.s.i. (pounds per square inch). 160 ft. divided by 2.31 *ft./p.s.i. = 70 p.s.i. * Conversion factor; ft. to p.s.i. To maintain an acceptable operating pressure of approximately 40 p.s.i. at the higher elevation would mean an unacceptable high level of pressure at th~ lower elevations. The overflow elevation of the water tower under construction is 1,160 MSL (Mean Sea Level;) as shown in the February 1984 Comprehensive Water Study. At this elevation, homes at the 1060 elevation would have an operating pressure of 43 p.s. i. However, homes at a lower elevation would have an increasingly higher pressure as they get lower in elevation. The reason for the recommendation for homes below elevation 975 to be protected by pressure reducing valves (PRV's) is that at this elevation they would expereince an operating pressure of 80 p.s.i. Tower Elevation 1,160 ft. Home Elevation 975 ft. = 185 ft. divided by 2.31 ft./p.s.i. = 80 p.s.i. /7~ .j . . Page Two Mr. Dan Yogt February 22, 1988 An operating pressure of 80 p. s. i. would not cause any problems, but as pressures rise above this point, there is a potential for possible damage to plumbing fixtures. There are two methods of providing reduced pressure to the user. One method is to i nsta 11 a PRY on the i ncomi ng 1 i ne to the house. The other method is to install mainline PRY's on the watermains in the street. We have shown the breakdowns of the two (2) alternate methods of installing PRY's on the attached sheet. Alternate -A- - Individual home PRY's has a cost of approximately $185.00 per home aDd $325.00 per townhome/quad. Alternate -B- - For two (2) mainline PRY's is $22,000. We have assumed that Alternate "A" individual home PRY's would be the appropriate method of protection. However, in previous discussions we have talked about the difficulties in initiating a program such as this. That is why we have shown the Alternate "a" method of protection. Some of the pros and cons associated with each method are as follows: 1. With individual PRY's there is no restriction in the mainline pipe. This would not reduce available pressures to the hydrants for fire fighting capabilities. 2. Accessibility to the individual homes could be a problem. 3. Cost - for individual PRY's the property owner would probably pay the cost. For mainl ine PRY's, discussions would take place to determine who would pay the cost. 4. Protection - if a mainline PRY malfunctioned, everyone would experience higher pressure and potential damage. If the individual PRY's were intended to be the method of protection, why weren't they put in when the were being built? We did discuss this matter at the beginning of the 1987 const uction season. The feeling at that time was that they may cause more problems t n if we waited and had them installed just prior to the elevated tower coming n-1 ine. With Minnetonka' s water system operating at a lower pressure than hat proposed for Shorewood, there was concern that people at the transit onal elevations would experience low pressure. This being the result of PRY's being slow to react when the differential pressure across the valve is relatively small. .- . . Page Three Mr. Dan Yogt February 22. 1988 A method whereby individual PRY's must be installed in existing homes is required regardless. In areas such as Shady Hills Addition where the watermain is existing and there are homes below elevation 975. this will mean individual PRY's will need to be installed in those homes. In some cODlDunities that have significant relief without a lot of intermittent high and low spots. such as Burnsville.there are designated pressure zones. Burnsville. for example. has eight (8) such zones. In addition. Burnsville requires the use of individual PRY's in all units. Those people who have had their own local reducers have not had a problem. If a mainline PRY were to fail and the individual homes did not have PRY's. they could experience mainline pressures that could damage their plumbing. Residents in Burnsville are responsible for installing and paying for their own PRY's. Taking the previous information into consideration. we feel a program should be set-up to inform the property owners and install individual PRY's prior to the elevated tower coming on-line in September of this year. If you have any questions. please call. Respectfully. ORR-SCHElEN-MAYERON & ASSOCIATES. INC. J-~ f?1/~ James P. Norton. P.E. Project Manager cc: Mr. Glenn Froberg Attorney at law Mr. Bob Polston Munitech Mr. Phil Tipka Resident Inspector L . ATTACHMENT NO. 1 A lternate -A- 1. Individual Home 3/4" PRY each installed No. homes affected (below 975 el.) (Near Mountain, Covington Vine Ridge, Waterford) 1. Subtotal Home 3/4" PRY's 2. Townhome/Quad 1-114" PRY each installed No. buildings (below 975 el.) 2. Subtotal Townhome/Quad 1-114" PRY's Alternate "A" Construction Cost (Subtotal 1 plus Subtotal 2) + 10% Contingency Total Construction Cost + 5% Indirect Costs TOTAL PROJECT COST Alternate -8- Install 2 - 6" PRY's 1. On Waterford Place at Old Market Road 2. On Covington Road at Old Market Road UNIT ITEM QTY. UNITS COST 1. 6' Dia. Precast MH 2 EA. $2,000.00 2. 8" x 6" Reducer 2 EA. 125.00 3. 6" x 8" Increaser 2 EA. 125.00 4. 6" Gate Valves 4 EA. 400.00 5. 6" CL 52 DIP 40 L.F. 20.00 6. Fittings 1,000 LBS. 1.00 7. Street Repair 1 L.S. 4,000.00 8. 6" PRY 2 EA. 2,000.00 Alternate "B" Construction Cost + 10% Contingency Total Construction Cost + 25% Indirect Costs TOTAL PROJECT COST . $ 160.00 x 233 $37,280.00 $ 280.00 x 70 $19,600.00 $56,880.00 5,720.00 $62,600.00 3,100.00 $65,100.00 TOTAl COST $ 4,000.00 250.00 250.00 1,600.00 800.00 1,000.00 4,000.00 4,000.00 $15,900.00 1,600.00 $17,500.00 4,500.00 $22,000.00 . . . MAYOR RobertR8ICOP COUNCI L Jen Haugen Kristi Stover Robert Gagne parb Braneel ADMINISTRATOR Daniel J. Vogt CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD . SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 · (612) 474-3236 MEMO TO: Mayor and Counci1members FROM. Dan VOgtJDClf DATE: March 8, 1988 SUBJECT: Proposed Amendment - Water and Sewer Agreement - Tonka Bay Attached you will find a letter received from the City of Tonka Bay soliciting input from Shorewood regarding a proposal to amend the 1973 water and sewer agreement between Shorewood and Tonka Bay. The letter goes into a great deal of detail regarding the proposal. From an economic standpoint, the connection fee calculation seems to make good sense. It uses what is felt to be a reasonable inflation factor. Also, it gives the benefit of the doubt if the cost of improvements to their system is less than anticipated by rounding down this fee from $2,593.00 to $2,300.00. $1,300.00 of the fee may be paid over a five (5) year period. The proposal also addresses a refund of a portion of the connection fee if the City of Shorewood installs its own water system within five (5) years of the connection to the Tonka Bay system. Further, the connection fee is frozen for five (5) years. The proposal finally establishes a method of charging a user fee to multi-family users. Staff has reviewed the proposal and finds it to be reasonable and therefore recommends that the City Attorney be directed to work with the Tonka Bay Attorney to draft an amended water and sewer agreement between the two cities as proposed. Please contact me if you have any questions relative to this matter prior to Monday night. DJV/s1q cc: Glenn Froberg Brad Nielsen Ev Beck Munitech Jim Norton Sandy Kennelly Don Zdrazil Kirk McDonald Enclosure A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore ItlJ . -JAM-A- - o/~1 ~~ 4901 Manitou Road. Tonka Bay. Minnesota 55331 Tel. 474-7994 December 28, 1987 MAYOR Ruth Sherman COUNCI L L.H. Haug Douglas Keller Lawrence Niccum Kent Ottum ADMINISTRATOR Kirk McDonald Mr. Dan Vogt City Administrator City of Shorewood 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, MN 55331 Dear Dan: The Tonka Bay City Council has directed me to contact you and solicit input from the Shorewood City Council regarding the following proposal to amend the 1973 Water and Sewer Agreement between our two cities. Because of recent and upcoming changes in the contiguous areas between Tonka Bay and Shorewood, our City Council has been reviewing the policies and procedures governing water connections between the two cities. The construction of multiple family dwelling units on County Road 19 in Shorewood and the construction of an elevated water tank at the Minnetonka Plaza in Tonka Bay are two examples of changes that are taking place. As you may be aware, Section II, #2c of the current agreement states that "Hookup to such (water) connection may be made in the Village of Shorewood only upon cash payment to Tonka Bay for each residential hookup in the amount of $1,500.00." The policy and rate currently in place are 1) based on the infrastructure of the existing Tonka Bay water system, and 2) do not address the issue of multiple family unit hookups. The fact that the original policy is based on one premise, but that new factors such as multiple units and system expansion are now becoming a reality, has caused the Tonka Bay Council to re-evaluate this policy. When John Dennis, representing Shorewood Oaks Partnership, appeared before the Tonka Bay Council to request consideration for water connections to his apart- ment complex, our Council had to determine 1) if the rate for multiple family dwellings would be the same as for single family hookups, and 2) what impact, if any, our water system improvement project should have on the current rate. We researched the connection and billing policies for single and multi-family units in many cities and held a work session to discuss this matter. It was the Council's goal to be fair with residents in Shorewood wishing to connect to the Tonka Bay water supply, to encourage additional water connections, and yet to keep in mind the past and future assessments Tonka Bay residents paid for water improvements and make the charge equitable. One other factor taken into consideration was that any single or multi-family water hookup to Tonka Bay from Shorewood may wish to disconnect in the future should Shorewood build water lines to service said properties. . . Dan Vogt City of Shorewood December 28, 1987 Page 2 Based on all of the foregoing, Tonka Bay would offer the following proposal to Shorewood for your consideration. 1. That the per unit water connection charge for both single and multiple family units in Shorewood be increased from the current $1,500 to $2,300. The justification for the increase in the connection charge is as follows: A. The original water improvement project in Tonka Bay, including the distribution system and the plant, was 75% assessed to property owners, and 25% was (and still is being) collected in general property taxes. B. The 75% assessed portion - $1,500 per unit assessment in Tonka Bay. C. If the project had been 100% assessed, the per unit assessment would have equalled $2,000. D. $2,000 is the assessment figure that should be used for out-of-city connections because Tonka Bay taxpayers paid the 25% of the project financed with the general tax levy. E. Using an inflation multiplier of 2.82 (as per Ken Adolf) to bring the 1971 $2,000 assessment up to date, in 1986 the $2,000 assessment is worth $5,636. F. If the $5,636 is split 1/3, 2/3 for plant and lateral, as the original assessment was, it calculates as follows: Orig. Assessment $1,500 1/3 (plant) - $500 2/3 (lateral) - $1,000 1986 Assessment with Inflation Factor $5,636 1/3 (plant) - $1,877 2/3 (lateral) = $3,759 G. The plant assessment of $1,877 should be paid because the facility needs upgrading, while the lateral is already in place. H. The maximum per unit assessment for the 1987/88 improvement project (water tower) is estimated to be $716. I. $1,877 + 716 $2,593 or rounded down to $2,300 2. That the $2,300 charge be paid in one of the following two ways (taking into consideration the possible temporary nature of some of the connections): A. Initial charge of $1,000 per unit paid at the time of the connection with the remaining $1,300 to be paid and prorated over a five (5) year period ($260 per year). If the connecting unit disconnects within the 5 year period, due to the possibility of Shorewood installing lines to these units, then the prorated charge would be refunded under the same formula at $260 per year. . . Dan Vogt City of Shorewood December 28, 1987 Page 3 B. If the entire $2,300 is paid initially and a disconnection made within 5 years, then the connector would receive a refund of a portion of the $1,300 based on the length (time) of the connection. In both cases, the $1,000 initial connection charge would be non-refundable. 3. That Tonka Bay would retain the option that the connection charge may increase after 5 years and would be tied to the construction cost index. 4. That multiple family units would be billed similar to single family homes, i.e., a 10 unit apartment complex would pay 10 minimum bills. Section II, 2d of the existing agreement already states that Shorewood residents connected to the Tonka Bay water system shall be charged user fees at the same rate charged to Tonka Bay residents. This agreement currently does not address multiple family dwelling billing. The justification for the multiple family billing policy is based on the following factors: A. The base or minimum charge of $22.00 for the first 10,000 gallons used is used to pay for the fixed cost to the city for all connections, such as meters, reading meters, utility billing and bookkeeping and should remain the same for single and multiple family dwellings. B. This is currently the policy used for multi-family units in Tonka Bay (double bungalows). 5. That #4 above would be based on the option that after three (3) years Tonka Bay would review and possibly reduce the rate if it can be proven that multiple units do not use the minimum amount of water. The Tonka Bay City Council feels that these amendments to the agreement would address the issue of multiple family connections from Shorewood, take into consideration and make allowances for the fact that units may wish to disconnect if Shorewood constructs water lines to these properties, establish a policy for multiple unit billing, upgrade the connection charge to include the upcoming Tonka Bay improvement project, and allow flexibility in the next several years to amend the policy, if needed, as our cities continue to change. I am enclosing excerpts from the Tonka Bay Council minutes of 10-27 and 11-10 to provide additional background information and would request that you present this proposal to the Shorewood City Council for their consideration and input. We desire to keep the line of communication on this issue open between the two cities and would welcome your thoughts on these matters. Please contact me if you have any comments or questions. Sincerely, -~~~~~ Kirk McDonald City Administrator Enc. - Excerpts 10-27/11-10 Minutes 1973 Agreement cc: City Council/Attorney/Engineer . Council Minutes October 27, 1987 . . -2 Third Quarter Liquor Store Report (Cont'd.) a work session, which had been recommended earlier by the Mayor. Suckerman stressed that someone on the Council should act as store owner and be responsible for overseeing the operation of the store, and if this is not done, the store will run into problems. Resident Larry Hewes suggested posting state statute penalties for passing bad checks in plain view to customers. Suckerman agreed this could be effective. Mayor thanked both Bloch and Suckerman for their presentations. 5.A. PUBLIC HEARING - Case Variance Request for Garage, 75 Lakeview - Res. No. 87-97 A public hearing was called at 8:10 p.m. to consider the request of Roger and Patricia Case for a rear yard setback variance to construct a detached garage,. Administrator stated the garage is proposed to measure 24 x 26 feet and will be constructed 15 feet from the street, which requires a 5 ft. setback variance. He added that all other zoning requirements have been met. Mrs. Case explained that their survey is old, and they are in the process of having it updated with the garage placed on it by another surveyor. There were no comments from the floor. The hearing closed at 8:14 p.m. Council comments: Haug stated hs is familiar with the property and felt that if the property pins are in place, he could accept the existing survey if it is approved by the building inspector. He had no objections to the variance. Niccum stated the Case's deserve to have a garage, adding it appears there will be enough room for off-street parking because the entire width of the right-of-way is not black- topped; therefore he felt the setback would be acceptable. Ottum questioned the hardship listed of decreasing the size of the rear yard if built within the required setback. Sherman stated that the garage would be at a different angle if moved further back and would support the variance if the garage were drawn in by a certified surveyor. Haug moved, Ottum seconded, to grant the Case's a 5 ft. rear yard setback variance for a garage contingent upon an accurate survey being provided. Roll call vote: Ayes 4. Administrator will inform the Council as to whether the new survey is the same as the one reviewed. 4.A. Approval of Resolutions Administrator stated that a discrepancy had been pointed out on Res. No. 87-93, Peterson Variance Grant, under condition #4, which should be changed to read "no wider.than 25 1/2 feet" in order to be consistent with the Council's concerns about not expanding the structure any closer to the lake than the present structure. Council agreed with the correction. Ottum moved to approve Resolutions 87-92, 94 and 95 as presented and Res. 87-93 with the correction as indicated. Niccum seconded the motion. Ayes 4. 6.A. John Dennis - Discussion of Shorewood Water Hookup John Dennis, owner of an 18 unit apartment building under construction on County Road 19 in Shorewood, appeared for a discussion on the possibility of connecting the building to the city's water system. Administrator gave a background report on Mr. Dennis' previous appearance for a similar request in February of this year, which had been tabled because a decision had not yet been made on water improvements and the Shorewood Council had not signed an agree~ent for increasing the connection charge to Shorewood residents. Both of these matters have now been resolved. Dennis stated he has installed two hydrants for the apartments and has made tentative plans to have a well drilled at a cost of $11,000. He also received an estimate '. . . Council Minutes October 27, 1987 -3 Dennis - Shorewood Water Hookup (Cont'd.) to tunnel under County Road 19 for connecting to the Tonka Bay system of $8,500. He asked if the City would be willing to sell him water and stated the building is designed for one meter. Haug stated he wants to sell water, but felt the City was basically in the same position as previously. It was also his opinion the apartments should be considered the same as 18 single homes and a connection charge of $1,200 paid for each unit. Dennis stated this cost would be prohibitive. Ottum asked what the $1,500 connection charge is based on and was informed it is equal to the original assessment paid by each Tonka Bay resident. Niccum added that it had been felt that others should not be able to hook up to the system at a cost less than what was assessed to the residents. Ottum felt the charge might be high for a high density project and that it could be in the City's best interest to allow the connection, and he favored working with the applicant. Dennis contended other communities charge less and felt that $500 is a fair per unit price. Sherman supported the hookup but wanted to charge an amount that would be fair to Tonka Bay residents. Administrator and Greg Kluver had also recommended that if the connection were made, the building should be charged for 18 minimum bills, or 10,000 gallons each. Dennis felt it would be rare that all units would use 10,000 gallons of water per quarter. City Engineer Ken Adolf felt the matter should be looked at from a broader viewpoint, stating that future assessment costs for a Shorewood system may be higher than those of Tonka Bay. He felt the Council should be cautious about establishing a connection charge as it may set a precedent for future charges. He recommended further study to make a determination on a fair charge. The advantages to the City would be receiving the revenue from the connection charge and selling more water, thereby holding down cost increases for water rates. He felt there would be no problem with having enough water supply based on the approved water improvements being made. He added that if the connection is not made, the property will still get protection benefits because of the presence of the hydrant across the street. He also felt it would not be much more expensive to install a larger- sized line than the 6-inch proposed line, which could potentially serve more ~ropertiee Niccum stated he had felt that $1,200 was a fair figure and did not feel he could agree to anything much less than this amount, but would be willing to negotiate somewhat. Mayor asked Dennis what kind of time frame he was under, and Dennis stated he wants to have the well operating by January 15. He.added that other cities have different hookup charges for multiple units which are usually metered by a single meter. Mayor recommended a study be made and a policy established for a feasible fee. After further discussion, it was agreed to meet for a separate work session next Tuesday, November 3 at 7:00 p.m. to discuss a water connection policy and also liquor store matters. 6.B. LMCD Dry Stacking Regulations Administrator reported that the LMCD is proposing an ordinance for regulating dry- stack storage on the lake and has asked for input from the municipalities. Copies had been provided to the Council for their review. Marv Bjorlin, the City's LMCD representative, felt that the City's ordinance would have precedence over the LMCD regulations. Attorney agreed, stating that if the LMCD allows drystacking, the city ordinance, which now prohibits dry stacking, would take precedence, and any applicant would have to seek approval by both governing bodies. Bjorlin stated that the LMCD, in the past, has delayed action on matters until the cities have responded. Ottum asked for the reason for the City's position on opposing dry stacking. Mayor explained the main reason for opposition was because of concerns about additional traffic and parking problems in the residential neighborhoods. After further discussion, the Council's consensus was that they had no objections to the proposed LMCD regulations. :~- -~- f "... ~ t- . . MINUTES REGULAR MEETING TONKA BAY CITY COUNCIL November 10, 1987 The regular semi-monthly meeting of the Tonka Bay City Council was called to order at 7:30 p.m. by Mayor Sherman. Also present were Councilmembers Haug, Niccum, Keller and Ottum, Attorney Penberthy, Administrator McDonald and Deputy Clerk G. Luke. 1. AGENDA The agenda was approved with the additions of 2.A. Resolution - Fred Rudolph, Plaza Barbers, and 4.J. Eric Berg - Trapping Permi.t, on motion of Niccum, seconded by Ottum. Ayes 5. 2. MINUTES Minutes of the regular meeting held October 27, 1987 were reviewed. Haug requested that on page 1, Third Quarter Liquor Store Report, the amount for bad checks loss be corrected to $952. The minutes were approved with the correction, on motion of Ottum, seconded by Niccum. Ayes 4, Keller abstaining. 2.A. Fred Rudolph, Plaza Barbers - Commendation for Service - Res. No. 87-98 Haug moved that a resolution be passed commending Fred Rudolph, owner of the Plaza Barber Shop, for his 32 years of business in the community. Niccum seconded the motion. Roll call vote: Ayes 5. 3.A. Approval of Resolutions Ottum moved, Haug seconded, that Res. No. 87-97 be approved as written. Ayes 5. 3.B. Tree Top Quotes Quotes were received for topping two city-owned diseased trees on Pleasant Avenue as follows: Todd's, Inc. - $260, and Shorewood Tree Service - $215. Niccum moved, Ottum seconded, to accept the low quote of $215 from Shorewood Tree Service. Ayes 5. 3.C. Water Connection/Billing Policy - Multi-Fam1lyDwellings in Shorewood Administrator presented a proposed policy for water connection and billing charges to multiple dwelling units in Shorewood, as discussed at a work session on November 3. Under the policy a $1,000 initial charge would be made and a balance of $1,300 would be prorated over a five year period for temporary connections (less than five years), for a total charge of $2,300. Permanent multi-family dwelling connections would be charged an initial connection of $2,300. It was also recommended that each unit in a multiple dwelling should pay a minimum quarterly water bill, as is now paid by single family units. Keller questioned the prorata policy starting the same year as the initial charge is made. He felt that if Shorewood installed their own water system within three years, the applicant would have paid more than what had been agreed on. He also felt a partial assessment policy would be more acceptable to Shorewood. There was further discussion on the definitions of permanent and temporary connections and whether there should be differing policies for each. John Dennis, developer of the Shorewood Apartments, questioned the billing rates and was of the opinion that apartment units would use considerably less than 10,000 gallons per unit. He felt that charging a minimum bill for each unit would have the effect of the City giving away water. Niccum felt it would have to be proven to the City that the building would not use that much water. . . Council Minutes November 10, 1987 -2 Water Connection Policy - (Cont'd.) Niccum moved to approve a water connection and billing charge policy for both multiple and single family units in Shorewood as follows: 1) Connection charge - Initial charge of $1,000 per unit plus $1,300 to be prorated over five years, beginning with the first year, until a total of $2,300 is paid, with temporary and permanent connections being defined, and that if the entire charge is paid initially and a disconnection made within five years, the applicant would receive a refundable portion under the same formula, with the option that the connection charge may increase after five years and would be tied to the construction cost index; 2) Billing policy - Each unit shall pay a minimum bill of $22.00 per 10,000 gallons and $1.40 per 1,000 gallons over the minimum, or the current water rate, with the option that after three years the City will review and possibly reduce the rate on the justification that the units do not use the minimum amount of water; and 3) that the Administrator be directed to contact the City of Shorewood with this proposal for their input and report back to the Council. Ottum seconded the motion. Discussion: Keller felt it would be a more saleable item to Shorewood if the $1,000 charge were made for three years, after which time the balance would be prorated over the next five years. Vote: Ayes 5. 3.D. Watershed District - Glen Road/County Road 19 Drainage City Engineer Ken Adolf reported on a meeting held with Jim Mahady of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, which has been appointed as the lead agency by Shorewood to study the drainage problem in this area because of proposed plans for new development. Shorewood has taken the position that this is a multi-city problem and therefore is requesting Tonka Bay's participation in seeking a solution. Mahady had stated that Shorewood could initiate a petition process requesting participation by Tonka Bay, which would involve possible assessment, or the two cities could work together in requesting a study be made on the matter. Administrator reported that the Shorewood Council has voted to proceed with a feasibility study and will be requesting Tonka Bay to participate in the cost. He added there is a possibility the study could be funded from the Watershed District's Maintenance and Repair Fund. A letter from the Watershed District contends that Tonka Bay is responsible for a portion of the runoff to this low area from the Plaza Shopping Center area. Mayor reported that this matter was first brought to the attention of the City in 1982 and no action had been taken. She felt the City should cooperate with the studies. Niccum also felt the City should cooperate until it is known what ~ill be proposed. Haug felt that the area at Glen Road is being flooded from properties in Shorewood a good distance away and that water from the shopping center mostly comes down the eastern edge of County Road 19 and seldom crosses over. He felt the City would have minimal responsibility in cost. John Dennis stated that other developments are planned for this area and studies have shown quite a bit of drainage coming from the shopping center. Keller stated that this area has been a holding area for many years and felt the City must become involved because the 12 inch culvert running under Brentwood Avenue cannot handle all of the drainage. Ottum was willing to cooperate, but noted that this area has been filled considerably, and felt the City should not be asked for financial support at this time. Adolf stated that the fill has been placed above the flood plain elevation and should not affect the ponding area. Ottum moved, Haug seconded, to request the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District to investigate possible funding of this project study from their Maintenance and Repair Fund. Ayes 5. ~.. .:,., . WATER AND SEWER AGREEr8r TONKA BAY - SHOREWOO!r' THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into this ~ day of . 0 ~.Lh ,1973 by and between tne Village of Tanka Bay f' a ~iCi~al corporation, hereinafter referred to as Tonka Bay, and the Village of Shorewood, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as Shorewood, WHEREAS, Tonka Bay did in the year 1965 construct an interior sewer system to serve land located within the confines of its village, and WHEREAS, Tonka Bay did during the year 1972 construct an interior water system to serve the land located within the confines of its village, and WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Sewer Board did during the year 1971 construct a Metropolitan Sewer line to serve, among other municipalities, in such a manner as to collect the sewage from Tonka Bay at one point at or near Manitou, Hennepin County Road No. 19 intersection, and WHEREAS, the Village of Shorewood did during the year 1972 construct a municipal sewer system to serve properties located within the confines of its village, and WHEREAS, the metropolitan interceptor serves Shorewood so that the trunks constructed by the Village of Shorewood can, in most cases, connect with the metropolitan interceptor at points within the confines of Shorewood, and WHEREAS, Shorewood is adjacent to Tonka Bay so that the two have a common border, and WHEREAS, there is a section of Shorewood the geography of which makes it impractical to connect to the metropolitan sewer interceptor without constructing expensive pumping stations and force mains, unless the area in question is, in fact, connected to the interceptor by use of the interior lateral sewer system of Tonka Bay, and WHEREAS, Tonka Bay and Shorewood agree that it is to the best interest of both villages to use the Tonka Bay interior sewer lines to serve the Shorewood area provided Tonka Bay is appropriately compensated for such use, and "~~':,'~j~' . , . .. . WHEREAS, S~ewOOd is desirous of be1ng~erved by water from the Tonka Bay municipal water system, and Tonka Bay is desirous of providing such service, and WHEREAS, Tonka Bay and Shorewood are desirous of setting forth in this agreement provisions under which Shorewood may make use of Tonka Bay's interior sewer system to reach the metro interceptor, and also provisions whereby Shorewood may receive water service from the Tonka Bay water system, NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and mutual covenants, it is hereby agreed as follows: I. USE OF TONKA BAY INTERIOR SEWER SYSTEM 1. Shorewood may connect a portion of its lateral sewer system to the Tonka Bay interior sewer system for the purpose of using the Tonka Bay lines to reach the metropolitan sewer interceptor provided that Shorewood concurrently file with the Village of Tonka Bay: a. A copy of the as-built plans of that portion of the lines so connected. b. A plat showing the area including the platted lots of that portion of the system so connected. c. A statement setting forth the maximum number of connections to be connected to the Tonka Bay system, which number shall not exceed - 20 - . d. A cash paYment to Tonka Bay in the amount of $300.00 for each unit hooked up or anticipated to be hooked up to the Tonka Bay system. 2. Tonka Bay will bill Shorewood annually a proportion of the cost of maintaining the interior Tonka Bay lines, which bill will be computed by first determining the cost of maintaining the Tonka Bay sewer system and taking a percentage of the cost which the Shorewood connections bear to 500 (Tonka Bay con- nections). 3. Tonka Bay will be responsible for maintaining its own interior system. In the event there is a breakdown in that system so as to preclude receiving sewage from the Shorewood connections, Tonka Bay will immediately notify Shorewood of the problem and it shall thereupon be Shorewood's responsibility to provide '" ~ . L" //". .~ CITY OF SHOREWOOD MAYOR Robert Rascop COUNCil Jan Haugen K risti Stover Ro.tJert Gagne Barb Brancel ADMINISTRA TOR Daniel J. VagI 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD . SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 . (612) 474.3236 MEMO TO: Mayor Rascop and Councilmembers Haugen, Stover, Gagne and Brancel FROM Ev Beck, Finance Director RE: Computer Hardware aDd Software In8t4llation DATE: 3/9/88 This week we began the installation of the IBM System 36 plus word processing and accounts payable software. Our final phase for computer automation was to be budgeted and implemented in 1989. On Monday, March 7th we received the attached letter from the President of AmeriData, James McCleary. Our current software will no longer be supported as of March 31. Rumors of this situation have been circulating for some time so I have been preparing for such an occurrence. Through many hours of discussion with Dan, Jim Maiser (our auditor) and our new software vendor, we feel the most efficient and cost effective way to handle this situation is to move forward at this time. This would mean purchasing the remainder of the system and installing in 1988 instead of 1989. I would recommend that the money in 1989 instead of budgeting for funds used from working capital. is $25,000. come from the working capital fund. Then this purchase, we budget to replace the The estimated cost to complete implementation Please call if you have questions or concerns. CC: Dan Vogt A Residentia' Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore ~ . ... .. ,.~ Corp''''&' '".,.,...rtm moo SJsI Amnw Nt.,," Mirrlftllpolis. MN ";.""'2 6U.SS7.2500 al).U2.J006 t Min...... ""'.frrr) ..".128-.t072 tN.r#it,,1IIl tc"'.fr<<) ~.!',.. 7 f9BB AmeriPata Karch I, 1'.. Dear RIIS U..r: -r1ll&" 10 henby IlYl". notlea rbat .. of !larch 31, 1911 ... "111 DO l......r be ProvldiDa OUpporr ..rvi_.. on ...,. of our _ Proflt -_a. .y.t... Sofboor. oourco -ode Vlll b. 090l1obl. for .11 ua.ro on . per P<oduc. 01"&1. olt. l1caao. boob. Tb10 olto 11__. Vlll prOYldo for ua. by tho purehuina a..ney ouly. no r..al. or trauf.r of tIli. code ViII b. perattt.d. Tbo ua.r -.ot bawo purcbuod rba pac..... la _orton la ordar to qualify for the .oure. code purehu.. Prieina p.r pecka.. for tbi. lie.na. 18 .nelo..d. If you have any furth.r que.tiona pl.... Bruc. Z~Z'IIan .t (612) 557-2537. J_. IfcCl.ary Pr..ident. AaeriData I ! I I I I I 1. ~ < CITY OF SHOREWOOD MAYOR Robert Rascop COUNCI L Jan Haugen K risti Stover Robert Gagne Barb Brancel ADMINISTRATOR Daniel J. Vogt 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD . SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 . (612) 474-3236 MEMO TO: Mayor Rascop and Councilmembers Haugen,Stover, Gagne and Brancel FROM: Evelyn Beck, Finance Director RE: Staffing Needs DATE: March 7, 1988 Due to the tremendous growth over the past three years every department has increased staff with the exception of the Finance Department. The services necessary to support this growth have greatly increased the budget plus has placed greater demands upon Council and staff. Most every decision that is made impacts the Finance Department as there is usually a cost involved. Finance is now in need of an additiontiperson due to the tremendous growth mentioned above and described on the attached page. Bringing the final phase of computer automation in house (the portion now being done in Waconia) will also add to our work load. Additional funding will not be necessary to cover this expense as interest earnings will be adequate to fund the cost. CC: Dan Vogt A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore jl1/88 Finance Department Staffing Need. The Finance Department is responsible for the financial transactions and statements of 18 separate entities including two liquor stores and the water and sewer operations plus the general operating fund. In 1987 over $13,000,000 was processed through the Finance Department and following are some additional figures that will give you an idea of how this department has grown. ,\}~ \ General Operating Budget Receipts Checks Invoices Investment Portfolio 1983 1987 '%. Increas. $785,937 $1,814,098* 230'%. 1,063 2,039 192'70 1,496 3,025 202'%. 11 57 5l8'%. 1,600,000 3,900,000 244'70 * Includes budget amendments of 1987 Many projects are now being put off in order to keep up with the day to day operations. You have been receiving a qualified audit opinion for many years because fixed assets were not in order. Over the past years I had been working as time permitted on that project however that work has now ceased due to time constraints. If you have questions regarding this information I would appreciate a call from you. I will be out of the office on Friday at a meeting but I will be available Thursday, March 10 and Monday March 14. "'" '. . . . - JAMES &fAlSER, CPA March 7, 1988 Mr. Robert Rascop, Mayor City of Shorewood Shorewood, Mn Per the request of your Staff, 1 have reviewed the need for additional staff in the Finance Department. The need for additional personnel by the Department is well documented. The statistics for the city are impressive. What is more impressive is that most of these statistics for Shorewood have more than doubled in the past five years and combined this with the significant changes in governmental accounting it is surprising that your staff has been able to keep up with all the changes with out additional personnel. Based on the information presented 1 believe that additional personnel is \o,,-arranted. If You or Council ~.ould like to meet and discuss the needs of your City 1 would be happ~" to come to a Council or Committee meeting. ~4? 44 WEST FIRST ST. WACONIA. MN 55387 61 2-442-4958 - ,.':. "'~::::~:Y~e:~-c.o-:e Shorewood users. Tw:.~ay shall not b:-~--i responsible to Shorewood for any breakdown in the Tonka Bay lines. 4. Shorewood shall be at liberty at any time to terminate use of the Tonka Bay lines; however, no money shall be due and payable to Shorewood in the event of termination of such use. II. WATER SYSTEM 1. In the event Shorewood determines that it desires to con- struct and install water lines within the Village of Shorewood, it may connect said lines to the Tonka Bay municipal water system upon the adoption by Tonka Bay of a resolution authorizing such ponnection. 2. Hook up to such connection may be made in the Village of Shorewood only upon: a. Obtaining a permit from the Village of Shorewood to so do, all in accordance with the ordinances of Shorewood. b. Copy of the application of such permit shall be submitted forthwith to Tonka Bay. No permit for such connection shall be issued by Shorewood until approval or disapproval thereof has been given by Tonka Bay. c. Cash paYment to Tonka Bay for eARh residential hook up in the amount of f'~~~~'~mmercial hoo~ ups shall pay the same rate as Tonka Bay users. d. Users connected to Tonka Bay water system shall comply with the Tonka Bay ordinances governing the use of the Tonka Bay water system in eluding the use of meters. Tonka Bay shall charge the residents of Shorewood connected to the Tonka Bay water system user fees at the same rate charged to Tonka Bay residents. In the event Shorewood desires to bill and collect said user fees, it shall be Shorewood's obligation to inspect and read the meters quarterly and remit to Tonka Bay that amount which would be due Tonka Bay if Tonka Bay billed directly. e. Shorewood shall be responsible for all delin- quent water accounts. The accounts of all water ~ V.,. .-.."'.----~--~--.,..?"~-iiIi";~. ~_._ .,.~..,~'~~~~~,~~ . ," users in Sh~OOd which are delinQUent4ltr more than ninety (90) days shall be turned over to Shorewood and Shorewood shall within thirty (30) days therea~ter make paYment to Tonka Bay and become absolute owner o~ the account. ~. Shorewood shall be obligated to inspect and repair all water lines located in the Village o~ Shorewood and in the event there is a de~ect or break in said lines, Shorewood shall immediately take steps to correct the same. If the break is not corrected, Tonka Bay may shut off the water at the Tonka Bay village limits. g. Shorewood shall not permit any connection to Tonka Bay water system without prior approval by Tonka Bay. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned governmental units have caused this agreement to be executed in their behal~ pursuant to the authority o~ their respective village councils. IN PRESENCE OF: VILLAGE OF TONKA BA~. ._ By~A'~ yor ~ t/.J..t/73 , By ?J-~~ L'd~;k " er VILLAGE OF SHOREWOOD ~~-- ayor 4'f~ '(/V1J BY'7nay '7/~~ .r...2 I Clerk-~ff ,/ -4 CU~MS FOR COUNCIL APPROVAL PAYEE MARCH 14, 1988 PURPOSE AMOUNT $ 78.00 50,283.84 1,902.60 A-I Minnetonka Rental A & K Construction Ameridata Corporation " , " " " " American Linen Supply American Linen Supply Acro-Minnesota, Inc. Acro-Minnesota, Inc. Earl F. Anderson & Assoc. Chaska Parts Service Commers Soft Water Co. Commissioner of Transportation Communications World Custom Business Forms Excel Bakery Feed Rite Controls Inc. Froberg & Penberthy, P.A. General Communications, Inc. W.W. Grainger, Inc. Jim Hatch Sales Co. Hennepin County Hennepin County International Business Machine International Salt Company Ken Jarcho Insurance Agency H.C. Mayer & Sons, Inc. Metropolitan Waste Control Midwest Animal Services Midwest Asphalt Corporation Minnegasco Inc. Minnesota Suburban News Wm. Mueller & Sons, INc. Munitech, Inc. Navarre True Value New World Systems Northern States Power Co. Northwestern Bell Orr-SChelen-Mayeron & Assoc. Rental-Water Const. Payment SE Area Pumphouse Emulation kits-Fin.- 633.00 " " Plann- 633.00 " " Water 160.00 " " Sewer 476.60 288.98 18.90 226. 17 28.00 1,893.70 233.55 22.50 27.28 738.80 1,211.63 14.78 20.00 4,197.80 Laundry-Garage Laundry-City Hall Office Supplies Desk Panel-Planning Post, Decals, Stickers, Signs-Traffic Cont. Bulbs, Filters-Public Works Rental-March Relamp-Traffic Control Add. Phone Jacks & Install-City Hall Accounts Payables Checks-Finance Cookies-Council Container-Water Legal Fees On-Going Development 66.40 Development 400.00 General 1,896.40 Sewer 20.00 Prosecutions 1,815.00 Move Station-City Hall Expansion Therm Spst.-Water Replacement Brooms-Public Works Prisoner Expense for Jan. 88 Appraisal Folders-General Diskettes, 2 Terminals, CPU-General & Fin. Ice Control Additional Premium-City Hall Gas & Trans. Fluid-Public Works Sac Charges-February Charges Animal Control for Feb. 88 Limestone-Public Workds Utilities-Boulder Bridge Notices & Ads-General & Development Sand-Ice Control March Water & Sewer Maintenance Misc. Supplies Parks 54.20 Water 52.75 City Hall 3.60 Public Works 43.84 Installation on Software-Finance CityWide Utilities Telephone Service-Water Engneering Fees Seal Coating 959.41 On Going Dev. 856.50 Park Capital Improve-972.00 BIg. Permits 299.81 General 2,538.60 Freeman Park PCI-692.50 SE Area Water 8,397.79 Shorewood Oaks 1,203.30 Development 216.00 Amesbury Water-72.00 124.20 36.28 434.05 157.75 20.00 10,383.40 583.47 165.00 283.97 6,534.00 465.65 128.64 321.10 201. 29 192.38 4,175.00 154.39 2,100.00 1,416.30 61.90 16,207.91 - 1 - . FOR COUNCIL APPROVAL PAYEE Pepsi Cola Perry's Truck Repair Judy Quaas . & W Roll-Off .Peter Seamans Super Cycle, Inc. Tonka Auto & Body Supply Ye8sco Inc. Water Products Company Weekly News, Inc. Zastrow-Nasset Const. Inc. MARCH 14, 1988- PURPOSE AMOUNT Rental-City Hall $ TRuck Repair-Public Works Jan & Feb Cleaning & Supplies Clean Up-Contract Replace Door-Pumphouse Recycling Services for Feb. 88 Supplies-Water 75.82 Public Works 4.45 Chlorine Parts-Water Meters-Water Legal Notices-General & Development Construction Payment-City Hall Total - 2 - 10.00 1,085.65 383.66 270.00 250.00 602.00 80.27 232.59 3,121.19 167.68 31,063.10 142,599.35 , , , CHECK NO. 052435 (G) 052436 (G) 052437 (G) 052438 (G) 052439 (G&L) 052440 (G&L) 052441 (G) 052442 (G) 052443 (L) 052444 (L) 052445 (L) 052446 (L) 052447 (L) 052448 (L) 052449 (L) 052450 (L) 052451 (L) 052452 (L) 052453 (L) 052454 (L) 052455 (L) 052456 (G) 052457 (G) 052458 052459 (G) 052460 (G) 052461 (G) 052462 (G) 052463 (G) 052464 052465 (G) 052466 (G) 052467 (G) 052468 (G) 052469 (G&L) 052470 (G) 052471 (G) 052472 (G) 052473 (G) 052474 (G) 052475 (G) 052476 (G) 052477-052489 .' . .. GENERAL & LIQUOR FUNDS-BILLS PAID SINCE FEBRUARY 18, 1988 TO WHOM PAID City-County Credit Union ICMA Retirement Corp. Child Support Enforcement Commissioner of Revenue The Bank of Excelsior Public Employees Retirement Medcenters Health Plan Knox Lumber Areawide Locksmiths, Inc. Bellboy Corporation Dowden Cablesystems Griggs, Cooper & Co. Johnson Bros. Wholesale Jude Candy & Tobacco Co. Minnegasco Minnesota Bar Supply Northern States Power Co. Ed Phillips & Sons Co. Pogreba Distributing Inc. RBKS Corporation Waste Management Savage Leukemia Society of America University of Minnesota Void Petty Cash Management Learning Labs A & G Electric Abel Heating Bob's Personal Coffee Void City of Excelsior Brad Nielsen City of Minnetonka City of Richfield Commerical Life Insurance Commers Soft Water Co. EOS Corporation Rolf E A Erickson W.W. Grainer, Inc. Hennepin County Dept. Hennepin County International Salt Company Checks were used in January Page 1 PURPOSE AMOUNT Payroll 2/l7/88-Credit Union $ Payroll 2/l7/88-ICMA Payroll 2/l7/88-Income withholding Payroll 2/l7/88-State wittholding Payroll 2/l7/88-Federal & Fica Payroll 2/l7/88-PERA Employee Health Insurance Feb. 88 Lumber for office furniture-Planning Drop Safe-Liquor Store Liquor Purchases Advertising Wine & Liquor Purchases Wine & Liquor Purchases Misc. & Cigarette Purchases Utilities Misc. Purchases Utilities- Liquor I Liquor Purchases Beer & Misc. Purchases Liquor & Wine Purchases Waste removal Funds collected from Liquor Stores City Clerks Conference-Kennely, Niccum Reimburse petty cash Books-Parks Service Call-Repair wiring Repair Furnace-City Hall Coffee, filters-City Hall 4th Quarter Water Billing Furniture & Fixtures-Planning 4th Quarter Utility Billing Invoices, Receipt Books, PO Books Employee Life Insurance May 1988 February Rent 1988 City Hall Addition February Assessing Fee Heater Replacement Postal Verifications Postage & folding ~ Bulk Ice Control 87 112.00 552.00 145.00 936.08 4,431.48 1,395.38 1,167.75 81.83 677.50 4,205.04 90.00 4,263.24 233.36 499.95 24.00 161. 60 246.41 586.94 1,454.80 229.50 28.00 19.00 190.00 14.59 71. 75 30.00 58.50 130.00 1,308.00 62.93 2,310.51 238.00 25.92 22.50 768.67 2,007.00 274.28 /-- -~ ,~. ?4_// - 346.08 544.14 CHECK NO. . . GENERAL & LIQUOR FUNDS-BILLS PAID SINCE FEBRUARY 18, 1988 TO WHOM PAID PURPOSE AMOUNT 052490 052491 052492 052493 052494 052495 052496 052497 052498 052499 052500 052501 052502 052503 052504 052505 052506 052507 052508 052509 052510 052511 052512 052513 052514 052515 052516 052517 052518 " - 052519 052520 05252J 052522 052523 052524 052525 052526 052527 052528 052529 052530 052531 052532 (G) (G) (G) (G) (G) (G) (G) (G&L) (G) (G) (G) (G&L) (G) (G) (G) (G) (G&L) (G) (G) (G) (G) (G) (G) (G) (G) (G) (G) (G) (G) (G) (G) (G) (G) (L) (L) (L) (L) (L) (L) League of Minn. Cities Loren Kohnen Long Lake Ford Tractor Kar Products Mac Tools Metropolitan Area Manage. H.C. Mayer & Sons Matthias, Roebke & Ebert Metropolitan Waste Contr. Void Void Midwest Mailing Systems Minnegasco Minnesota Mutual Life Minnetonka Community Serv Minnesota Suburban News Void Pepsi Cola Photo Factory Physician Health Plan Fred Pryor Seminars South Lake Mtka Public Thompson & Lundquist Tonka Printing Co. Van Waters & Rogers Waste Management Savage New World Systems Ziegler Inc. Acro-Minnesota Inc. " " Northern States Power Northwestern Bell Evelyn Beck The Prudential Loring Labs Inc. Patty Helgesen Jean Sorensen Void Bellboy Corporation Griggs, Cooper & Co. Johnson Bros. Wholesale Minnesota Victoria Oil Minnegasco Harry Niemela Labor Relations Subscriber Jan. Building Inspections Pin-Public Works Parts-Public Works Socket Set-Public Works Luncheon-Seminar-Administrator Regular & Diesel-Public Works Computer Services Nov. & Dec. 87 March Sewer Charges Postage Labels Utilities-City Wide Accident & Sickness Ins.-Employee Summer Recreation Program Ads-Public Works & General $ 854.00 3,029.39 2.40 100.37 40.95 10.00 1,492.95 558.00 24,659.55 17.50 1,032.95 125.28 3,032.95 54.81 Pop Purchases-City Hall 57.75 Film-Planning 4.90 March 88 Health Insurance 2,542.37 Seminar-Finance 98.00 March 88 Budget-Police 27,874.84 Attorney Fees & Costs 1,045.73 Envelopes-City Hall 146.00 . 80 bags-Ice Control 582.00 :~~~:a~:~~~:~:~~ty Hall CG:O~~~ Parts-Public Works ~5.68 Office Supplies-City Hall 229.61 Fan-Finance 35.96 Utilities-City Wide Parks-l08.43 2,027.91 Telephone Service-City Wide-Parks130.l4 597.51 Mileage-Finance 45.72 Additional Life Insurance 5.20 Parts-Garage 30.00 Shelves, Misc. Hardware-Planning 25.63 Mileage-Finance 14.30 Liquor Purchases Liquor Purchases Wine & Liquor Purchases Utili~es-Liquor I Utilities-Liquor II March Rent 1988 Page 2 2,261.25 3,902.14 2,771.92 139.38 129.00 970.00 . . . GENERAL & LIQUOR FUNDS-BILLS PAID SINCE FEBRUARY l8t 1988 CHECK NO. TO WHOM PAID PURPOSE AMOUNT 052533 (L) Northwestern Bell Advertising & Tel. Service $ 148.77 052534 (L) Ed Phillips & Sons co. Liquor & Wine Purchases 234.19 052535 (L) Quality Wine & Spirits Wine Purchases 609.61 052536 (L) Ryan Properties March 88 Rent-Liquor I 1,922.58 052537 (L) Tombstone Pizza Corp. Misc. Purchases 10.25 052538 (G) City-County' Credit Union Payroll 3/l/88-Credit Union 112.00 052539 (G) ASCME Local #224 Payroll 3/l/88-Union Dues 81.00 052540 (G) Child Support Enforcement Payroll 3/l/88-Income Withholding 145.00 052541 (G) ICMA Retirement Corp. Payroll 3/l/88-ICMA 552.00 052542 (G&L) Public Employees Retirement Payroll 3/l/88-PERA lt363.48 052543 (G&L) Commissioner of Revenue Payroll 3/l/88-State Withholding 898.04 052544 (G&L) The Bank of Excelsior Payroll 3/l/88-Fed. & Fica 4t3l2.49 052545 (G) Daniel Vogt Mileage-Administrator 34.10 052546 (G) Craguns conference Center Seminar-Administrator 70.00 052547 (G) Northern States Power Co. Utilities-Covington 492.80 052548 (G) Minnegasco Utilities-Knightsbridge 124.68 052549 (G) A T & T Telephone Service .78 052550 (G) A T & T Telephone Service 7.52 Total Liquor Total General 28,174.52 94,621.94 Page 3 .. CHECK NO. . . GENERAL & LIQUOR FUNDS-BILLS PAID SINCE FEBRUARY 18, 1988 TO WHOM PAID AMOUNT PURPOSE 201916 201917 (G) 201918 (G) 201919 (G) 201920 (G) 201921 (G) 201922 (G) 201923 (G) 201924 (G) 201925 (G) 201926 (G) 201927 (G) 201928 (G) 201929 (G) 201930 (G) 201931 (G) 201932 (G) 201933 (G) 201934 (G) 201935 (G) 201936 (G) 201937 (G) 201938 (G) 201939 (L) 201940 (L) 201941 (L) 201942 (L) 201943 (L) 201944 (L) 201945 (L) 201946 (L) 201947 (L) 201948 (L) 201949 (L) 201950 (L) Void PAYROLL Robert Rascop Janice Haugen Barbara Brance1 Robert Gagne Jr. Kristi Stover Daniel Vogt Sandra Kennelly Susan Niccum Shelly Quaas Evelyn Beck Jean Sorensen Bradley Nielsen Patricia Helgesen Charles Davis Dennis Johnson Daniel Randall Howard Stark Ralph Weh1e Donald Zdrazil Joseph Lugowski Martey Jakel Timothy Carroll Russell Marron Robert Nash Christophe Schmid Donald Thara1son Jeffrey Dewitt John Thompson William Josephson Susan Latterner Dean Young Scott Bennyhoff Scott Bartlett James Shelledy Mayor Counci1member Counci1member Counci1member Counci1member 80 reg. hrs. 80 reg. hrs. 80 reg. hrs. 80 reg. hrs. 80 reg. hrs. 80 reg. hrs. 5.5 OT 80 reg. hrs. 80 reg. hrs. 80 reg. hrs. 80 reg. hrs. 80 reg. hrs. 82 reg. hrs. 82 reg. hrs. 80 reg. hrs. 80 reg. hrs. 22.5 reg. hrs. 32.35 reg. hrs. 80 reg. hrs. 45 reg. hrs. 74.5 reg. hrs. 8 reg. hrs. 16 reg. hrs. 22 reg. hrs. 80 reg. hrs. 36 reg. hrs. 80 reg. hrs. 53.5 reg. hrs. 31.5 reg. hrs. 18 reg. hrs. $ 200.00 126.32 147.82 150.00 150.00 1,000.54 744.59 483.30 401.59 690.63 586.78 851.53 629.30 396.83 620.74 634.39 555.68 524.66 853.33 623.29 110. 7 137.59 499.17 199.10 268.91 41.20 64.86 104.00 522.90 146.70 501. 27 234.87 141.21 79.83 Total Liquor 2,804.02 Total General 10,619.78 Total Liquor 30,978.54 Total General 105,241. 72 TOTAL 136,220.26 Page 4