012687 CC Reg AgP
CITY OF S~3EWOOD
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING
MONDAY, JANUARY 26, 1987
~ ..
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD
7:30 P.M.
AGE N D A
CALL TO ORDER
A. Pledge of Allegiance
B.
Roll Call
Hauger.
Stover
Gagne
Brancel
Mayor Rascop
~
~-
~
'1:;b
'\,
1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. Regular Council Meeting - January 12, 1987
(Att. #1 - Minutes)
2. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR
A.
B.
3. PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT
A.
f
B.
4. PARK COMMISSION REPORT
A.
B.
5. CONSENT AGENDA
A. Permanent Appointment - Shelly Trinka
(5A - Memo)
B.
~,
~,./
Ly wv)O
Moved
2nd
Vote
6. CORRIDOR STUDY FINAL RECOMMENDATIONS
(Att. #6A Staff Report)
(Att. #6B Request from
Property Owner
-1-
COUNCIL'hGENDA
. MONDAY, JANUARY 26, 1987
7. C.U.P. FOR A SELF-STORAGE FACILITY
Applicant: Manitou Properties, Inc.
Location: 5620 County Road 19
(Att. #7 - Staff Report)
8. HOUSE MOVING PERMIT - SUNGOL~~HOMES
Applicant: Jim Funk
Location: 6115 Riviera Lane
(Refer - Staff Report in
1/12/87 Packet )
(Att. #8 - Resident Letter)
9. PETITION FOR IMPROVEMENT - SHOREWOOD OAKS
Applicant: Dave Johnson
Location: Strawberry Lane/Highway 7
(Att. #9 - Staff Memo)
10. REQUEST TO SET PUBLIC HEARING FOR STREET VACATION
Appl~cant: Mark and Jack Swedlund
Location Ferncroft Drive (Sunrise Lane)
11. ATTORNEYS REPORT
A.
B.
12. ENGINEER REPORT
A.
B.
13. PLANNERS REPORT
A. Status of City Hall/Badger Park Improvements
B.
14. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS
A. Bond Refinancing Discussion
B.
15. MAYORS REPORT
A.
B.
'l
..
CITY OF
REGULAR
MONDAY,
'If ~
SHOREWO~.t; }k~ ~~!~f'''\f': ~>7"l"~'~.,. _.. !",L CHAMBERS
COUNCIL . ~t:J~} .. .". 5 OUNTRY CLUB
JANUARY 12,1987 7:30"P.M.
ROAD
M I NUT E S
CALL TO ORDER
The regular meeting of the Shorewood City Council was called to
order at 7:30 P.M. Monday, January 12, 1987 in the Council Chambers.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE AND PRAYER
Mayor Rascop opened the Regular Council Meeting with the Pledge
of Allegiance and a Prayer.
ROLL CALL
Present: Mayor Rascop, Councilmember Haugen, Stover, Gagne and
Brancel.
Staff Attorney Froberg, Engineer Norton, Administrator Vogt,
Planner Nielsen and Clerk Kennelly.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Joint Council Meeting
Gagne moved, seconded by Haugen, to approve the minutes of the
December 8, 1986 Joint Council Meeting with Excelsior and Shorewood
Councils, as written. Motion carried - 5 ayes.
Regular Council Meeting
Gagne moved, seconded by Haugen, to approve the minutes of the
Regular Council Meeting of December 8, 1986 as corrected on pages
2 and 4. Motion carried - 5 ayes.
PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT
Stover reported on the January 6, 1987 Planning Commission meeting
reviewing the Albrecht sub-division and the Norenberg variance
requests. They recommended appointment of Vern Watten for Chair-
man and Janet Leslie for Vice Chair for 1987. They have also re-
quested that the corridor study information be presented at their
January 20, 1987 meeting.
PARK COMMISSION REPORT
Gordy Lindstrom indicated that the Commission would like approval
of Marty Jakel as this years Chair and Ken Vogel as Vice Chair.
They reviewed and listed their priority projects for 1987:
-Manor Park Warming House/Pavilion
-Crescent Beach Dock
-Ski Trails for Freeman Park
-Grading of Silverwood Park
-Added Picnic Tables at all Parks
-Completion of Badger Football Field
-Completion of Outfield at Manor Park
Administrator Vogt presented budget requests needing Council
approval.
-1-
/
COUNCIL MINUTES .
MONDAY, JANUARY r , 1987"
page two
.
PARK COMMISSION REPORT - cont.
Gagne moved, seconded by Stover, to approve the purchase of a
park snowblower. Motion carried - 5 ayes.
Gagne moved, seconded by Stover, to increase the rink attendant
salary for Martey Jakel to $5.00 an hour for additional duties
performed. Motion carried - 5 ayes.
CONSENT AGENDA - Items Approved
Covington Vine Ridge - Letter of Credit Reduction
RESOLUTION NO. 1-87
A request has been received from United Mortgage to reduce the
Letter of Credit on Covington Vine Ridge Project. Staff has
reviewed and recommended approval of the reduction to $29,000,
150% of the balance of the road to be completed.
Garbage Collectors Licenses RESOLUTION NO. 2-87
Administrator Vogt submitted a new application from the garbage
collectors for 1987:
-Browning-Ferris Industries of Minnesota Inc.
-Crosstown Sanitation
-Gopher State Trucking
-Quality Waste Control
-R & W Sanitation
-Waste Management
-Westonka Sanitation
Approval of Payment Voucher #1 - Project No. 86-lE
Engineer Norton recommended approval of payment in the amount
of $13,300.48 to Widmer Inc. for work completed on Project No.
86-lE.
Cigarette License Approvals
The following applications have
Cigarette Licenses:
-American Legion Post #259
-Country Kitchen
-Driskills Super Valu
-Howards Point Marina
-ICO
-Minnetonka Country Club
-Plaza Tom Thumb
-Snyder Drug
-Skipperette
-Arnolds Hamburger
Haugen moved, seconded by Gagne, to approve the above listed items
as requested. Motion and Resolution approved by Roll Call Vote -
5 ayes.
RESOLUTION NO. 3-87
been received for the 1987
...
-2-
COUNCIL MINUTES .
MONDAY, JANUARY. , 1987
page three
.
CHRISTMAS LAKE ROAD/CHRISTMAS LANE DEAD END PROPOSAL
Bruce Benson requested a delay in this decision until later on
the agenda in order for other residents to be present.
REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION OF STREET VACATION (SUNRISE LANE)
Jack Swedlund was present to request an exchange of property with
the City at the end of Ferncroft Drive, referred to as Sunrise
Lane. He would like to exchange the 33' fire lane for the 40'
immediately south of that fire lane.
Stover indicated that the current access is being used by the
area children for access to Lake Williams, she also questioned
whether the topography of that lot was as desirable as the current
access. Swedlund stated that the current path being used is on the
lot to the south and not on the fire lane.
Attorney Froberg explained the necessary steps to be followed if
the Council chose to approve the request.
Council would like to review this site before acting on this request.
Mr. Swedlund has agreed to stake the lots to be exchanged and the
proposed new subdivision lot lines.
~
SIMPLE SUBDIVISION - DAVID ALBRECHT
RESOLUTION NO. 4-87
Planner Nielsen recommended approval of the simple subdivision of
this lot into two lots meeting the zoning ordinance requirements.
Norton requested a 20' temporary easement for one (1) year for the
purpose of drainage clean out.
Gagne moved, seconded by Stover, to approve the subdivision subject
to the 20' temporary easement and the planners six (6) recommendation
listed in his 12/30/86 staff report. Motion carried by Roll Call
Vote - 5 ayes.
CHRISTMAS LAKE ROAD/LANE - DEAD END ROAD PROPOSAL
Councilmember Haugen opened the discussion by requesting Engineer
Norton to review past traffic studies done on Christmas Lake Road.
Norton felt the 1972 report was too old to be reflective, 1976 did
not include Christmas Lane and Mill Street and the current MnDOT study
does not address the issue of turning movements.
Rascop then opened the discussion to the audience with 2 minute time
limits until everyone has had a chance to speak at least once.
Bruce Benson of 5820 Christmas Lake Road requested additional time
as spokesman for the Christmas Lake group.
Rascop reviewed the petition received at the December 8, 1986 Council
meeting requesting the culdesacing of Christmas Lake Road at
21355 Christmas Lane. This petition was signed by 100% of the resi-
dents on Christmas Lake Road and Lane.
Benson referred to the staff report that listed various concerns
raised by the creation of this culdesac and responded to each item.
He referenced existing culdesac, Woodside Road. He submitted pic-
tures of a "crash gate" existing in Amesbury and stated that the
Police Department letter of opposition was referring to a different
type of gate.
-3-
COUNCIL MINUTES.
MONDAY, JANUARY , 1987
page four
.
CHRISTMAS LAKE ROAD/LANE - DEAD END PROPOSAL - cont.
He felt the water supply for fire protection could come from
Christmas Lake instead of fire hydrants in the area. The City
of Minnetonka stated that a culdesac has less crime occurances.
He did ~ feel the added time or expenses to the City for plowing
or the post office was irrelevant. The change of bus stops to the
end of Christmas Lake Road or Mill Street will not be a problem if
the traffic hazard is eliminated.
The audience then presented their views.
Cindy Studer of 2nd Avenue, Excelsior questioned the reason for
the culdesac proposal. Council referred to the petition submitted
due to the residents concerns of too much traffic flow on this road.
She feels the flow of traffic will be redirected onto 2nd and 3rd
Avenues, causing a traffic problem there instead.
Mary Simcox of 6180 Mill Street feels the road should be improved to
20' wide and continue to be used.
Marc Simcox of Lilac Lane felt additional facts should be obtained
prior to any decisions being made.
MikePeirro responded to Mrs. Studer's question and reviewed the
history or past traffic studies and the resulting installation of
posts and no turning signs at Mill Street and Christmas Lake Road.
Carolyn Squires did not feel the culdesacing of this street was an
attempt to close or create a private street.
Betty Christensen of Brand Circle does not feel there is a traffic
problem currently and sees no need to culdesac the streets.
Carol Watson spoke for her mother, Mrs. Clark of 6110 Mill Street.
This resident receives a great deal of turn around traffic created
by the no turning signs in order to make legal turns. She does not
feel this culdesac is .beneficial to those on Brand Circle. She
spoke in support of the patrolling done by the police department.
Carol Ann MacKay of 5925 Christmas Lake Road commented on the road
requirement and the cost of upgrading the street to 24' if it was
reopened to allow Mill Street traffic to get to Highway 7.
The question of the cost of the culdesac was asked. The cost of this
improvement will be covered by the Christmas Lake petitioners, do-
nated land and improvement costs.
Ann Hillius of 5885 Christmas Lake Road felt street lights were
needed to make the streets safer.
Sue Benson has lived on this street many years and feel the police
enforcement of speeding has been adequate.
Richard Dyer of Brand Circle told the Council of a school project
done by his daughter indicating that 72% of the car turning on
Christmas Lane either turned around illegally or did a U-turn in
Mrs. Clarks driveway in order to turn legally. This has been a
continuing problem since he's owned his home.
-4-
COUNCIL MINUTES .
MONDAY, JANUARY 1987
page five
.
CHRISTMAS LAKE ROAD/LANE - DEAD END PROPOSAL - cont.
Bob Fayfield feels the proposed up grade of Highway 7 and the inter-
section at Christmas Lake Road will only cause additional funneling
of traffic from Mill Street to Highway 7, and it should not be through
Christmas Lake Road.
Ted Williams of 6065 Mill Street stated his opposition to the culde-
sacing stating concerns for emergency vehicles being able to save
time by the use of familiar thru street. He doesn't want the road
opened completely because it happens to be one of the only roads his
wife can go in her electric wheel chair.
Council discussed the proposal and various other alternatives.
Engineer Norton felt the problem was getting the traffic to Highway 7,
this should include input from MnDOT. The traffic problem is not
Shorewood's alone nor is it created by only Shorewood. Stover feels
the long culdesac is better than a local street being used as a
collector street.
The problem was referred to as a "Catch 22" situation by Steven Pahl.
He feels experimentation should be used until a solution can be found.
Mr. Pierro feels the culdesac is the best solution to the problem.
After lengthy discussion~/moved, seconded by Gagne, to direct
the Engineer to order a traffic study for Christmas Lake Road and
Lane, both north and south ends, and to estimate a cost for the up-
grading of Christmas Lake Road, to be returned for the February 23rd
Council Meeting, Motion carried - 5 ayes.
Council Break 9:27 - 9:40
SETBACK VARIANCE - 27470 PINE BEND
RESOLUTION NO. 5-87
A request to add onto the existing house, which is currently 19'
from the road right of way, will require a variance to expand.
Stover moved, seconded by Gagne, to approve the variance in accordance
with the planner's recommendations stating the lot config~ation a
hardship. Motion carried by Roll Call Vote - 5 ayes.
REQUEST FOR HOUSE MOVING PERMIT
A request for a house moving permit was requested by ,James Funk of
Sungold Homes. He would like to move a 28 x 52 manufactured home
onto a lot at 6115 Riviera Lane. Council questioned if the
Engineer has reviewed the route of travel for the home. He just
received the request and has not approved the route at this time.
Mr. Funk felt that there were no problems with the proposed route.
Nielsen explained that the home exceeds the codes of the manufac-
tured homes as set up by legislature and that is all that has to be
enforced besides the requirements allowed to be added by the City.
The home will meet the City requirements by constructing a permanent
concrete foundation and asphalt shingles. Haugen explained the
legislature action allowing manufactured homes in all cities.
Attorney Froberg referenced state statue #327.32 regulating manufac-
tured homes.
-5-
COUNCIL MINUTES
MONDAY~ JANUARY~, 1987
page s~x
~
REQUEST FOR HOUSE MOVING PERMIT - cont.
Erik Jacobsen of 6065 Riviera Lane expressed his concerns that the
quality of these homes could go down if the rest of this subdivision
is allowed to install more mobile homes. Rascop responded with the
requirement of the current Ordinance as the cities only control.
Steve Pahl stated that the current driveway for this property goes
over a corner of his lot. Mr. Funk indicated that would be corrected.
Bob Fisk discussed the possibility of imposing standards on the sub-
division, "restrictive covenants". This would have to be placed on
the subdivision by the developer, and the owners. The City cannot
require that or impose it at this time.
Haugen moved to approve the moving permit subject to receiving approvals
of the route from the Planning Commission, Police Department and the
City Engineer. Motion died for lack of second.
Stover moved, seconded by Haugen, to return the request to the
Council meeting of January 26 in order to obtain recommendations from
the Planning Commission, Police and Engineer.
Motion carried - 5 ayes.
Hazel Boote of Yellowstone questioned why the foundation was already
in. Nielsen indicated that no permit had been obtained, the work
was stopped when discovered and a double fee will be charged.
WATERFORD 2ND ADDITION - BUILDING PERMIT APPROVAL
Robert Mason has requested a building permit for a model home in the
unplatted Waterford 2nd Addition.
Gagne moved, seconded by Haugen, to approve the request for one model.
home to be unoccupied until all utilities are installed. Motion
carried - 5 ayes.
WATER TOWER SITE DISCUSSION
Attorney Froberg was informed by Mr. Ken Cook of the State Highway
Department, that the Federal approval has been obtained to dispose of
the easement needed for the Water Tower Site. State approvals could
come next week but the appraisers are back logged and it may take
two (2) months to complete the appraisal. It could take six (6) months
to complete the title transfer.
Gagne questioned the purchase of property from Robert Mason instead
if the appraisal comes in too high.
Rascop spoke to Mr. Mason and he is not interested in having the
tower located on his property~
1987 CITY APPOINTMENTS
RESOLUTION NO. 6-87
Refer to insert:
Haugen moved, seconded by Stover, to adopt the 1987 appointments as
listed in the Resolution, by Roll Call Vote - 5 ayes.
-6-
COUNCIL MINUTES
MONDAY, JANUARY~, 1987
page seven
~
PLANNERS REPORT
Status Report on City Hall/Badger Park Project
Planner Nielsen informed the Council that the Public Hearing on the
proposal for the City Hall/Badger Park Area Project will be held
by the Planning Commission on January 20, 1987. Resident
Joanne Carroll requested that the Public Hearing be rescheduled for
one (1) month because of some residents not being able to attend
this hearing. Council directed the hearing to be continued to
the February 3, 1987 meeting, also Carroll questioned why the Council
has already been presented with a plan prior to the public hearing.
Nielsen explained that this was a Comprehensive Plan for the entire
Badger Park/City Hall area and not interior plans for the house
property. The plans were reviewed by the Council for a concept
approval.
Bill Wrede voiced a complaint on the drainage ditch around the city
property. He would like it cleaned out or a culvert installed.
He also complained about a parking problemin.his neighborhood. This
will be referred to the Police Department.
Corridor Study
A draft for discussion will be submitted for review at the January
26 Council Meeting. Recommendations on alternative plans will be
forwarded to MnDOT.
Planning Commission Vacancy
The Council will meet on January 26 at 6:30 P.M. to interview
applicants for the Planning Commission.
ATTORNEYS REPORT
An Executive Session was called to discuss condemnation proceedings
for the drainage proposal on Eureka Road. Froberg also informed
them of a lawsuit filed by the American Druggists Insurance Company
Versus The City of Shorewood et al (Bonding company/City Hall
construction).
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS
Union Update
Meetings have been held and have been scheduled into March. The
negotiations are proceeding, but proceeding slowly.
NBA Name Recommendation
Haugen moved, seconded by Stover, to support the suggested name
for a tentative NBA Minnesota team to be called Timber Wolves.
Motion carried - 5 ayes.
MAYORS REPORT
Elected Officials Conference
The newly elected officials conference will be held on January
31, 1987.
LMCD
The LMCD is getting no support from other organizations regarding
supporting their legislative proposals at this time.
~
COUNCIL MINUTES.
MONDAY, JANUARY , 1987
page eight
.
COUNCIL REPORTS
Juvenile Curfew Ordinance
ORDINANCE NO. 193
Stover moved, seconded by Rascop, to reconsider the denial of
the curfew ordinance. Motion carried - 4 ayes to accept the
reconsideration. 1 nay (Haugen).
Gagne moved, seconded by Stover, to adopt the Ordinance as drawn
omitting "unlawful gathering" from sections 6061 & 6062.
Ordinance adopted by Roll Call Vote - 4 ayes to 1 nay (Haugen).
Police Building Consideration
Gagne inquired if the Police Department was considering moving from
their present facility. Rascop indicated that they would be looking
at various options this year.
APPROVAL OF CLAIM AND ADJOURNMENT
Haugen moved, seconded by Gagne, to adjourn the January 12, 1987
Council Meeting subject to approval of claims at 12:23 A.M., January
13, 1987. Motion carried unanimously - 5 ayes.
General and Liquor Funds - 00-00166-02
(General)
= $ 1,735.27
= $11,980.91
= $33,508.43
$47,224.61
#32934 - 32936
#32955 - 33000
#05001 - 050038
(Liquor)
$35,074.10
$ 9,500.28
$44,574.38
Payroll Check List
#200915 - 200947
= $ 9,253.84
$ 2,907.88
$47,482.26
Grand Total
= $56,478.45
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,
Sandra L. Kennelly
City Clerk
Mayor Rascop
-8-
~ RESOLUTION NO. 6-87 ~
1. Deputy Mayor
1 ~earte~m -.H~ugen
..
(13rancel recommended for 1988)
2. Representatives to:
8.
Representati~s to Affiliated Organizat~s:
a. Association of Metro Municipalities - Haugen
b. Minnetonka Community Services - Shaw (Citizen Representative)
c. Lake Minnetonka Conservation Dist. - Rascop
d. Lake Minnetonka Cable Communication Commission
Barb Brancel (Councill
Dean Johnson (Resident)
9. Bank Depository
The Bank Excelsior, Marquette Bank and other depositories
as necessary
10. Newspaper
South Shore Weekly
Sun Sailor (M.S.N.)
Gagne moved, Rascop seconded, to approve 2 legal newspapers.
Motion carried - 5 ayes.
11. Planning Commission Appointments:
Chairperson:
Vice Chair:
Members:
Vern Watten
Janet Leslie
Janet Leslie-3 year term to expire 12/31/89
Richard Spellman-3 year term to expire 12/31/89
12. Park Commission Appointments:
Chairperson:
Vice Chair:
Members:
Martey Jakel
Ken Vogel
Gordon Lindstrom - 3 year term to expire 12/31/89
Haugen moved, seconded by Stover, to adopt the 1987 appointments
as listed in the Resolutio~. Motion carried by Roll Call Vote -
5 ayes.
,_. ;
CHECK NO
* 32936
32934
32935
32955
32956
32957
32958
32959
32960
32961
32962
32963
32964
32965
32966
32967
32968
32969
32970
32971
32972
32973
32974
32975
32976
32977
32978
32979
32980
32981
32982
32983
32984
32985
32986
32987
32988
32989
32990
32991
32992
32993
32994
32995
32996
32997
32998
32999
33000
050001
050002
050003
. .
GENERAL & LIQUOR FUNDS - BILLS PAID SINCE JANUARY 7, 1987
TO WHOM PAID
Void
(G) O.J. Janski & Associates, Inc.
(G) City of Minnetonka
(G) Henn. Cty. Treasurer
(G) David Sanders
(G) University of Minnesota
(G) Martey Jakel
(G) Northwestern Bell
(G) NSP
(G) MN PELRA
(G) Public Employees Retire. Assoc.
(G) ICMA Retirement Corp.
(G&L)The Bank Excelsior
(G) Commissioner of Revenue
(G) City-County Credit Union
(G) Child Support Enforcement Unit
(G) AFSCME LOCAL #224
(G) Medcenters Health Plan
(L) Air Refrigeration
(L) BellBoy Corporation
(L) Coca-Cola Bottling Midwest
(L) Day Distributing Co.
(L) Eagle Distributing Co.
(L) East Side Beverage Co.
(L) G&K Services
(L) Johnson Bros. Wholesale Liq.
(L) Jude Candy & Tobacco Co.
(L) Mark VII Distributors
(L) MN Suburban Newspapers, Inc.
(L) MN Victoria Oil Co.
(L) Nat'l Guardian Security Svc.
(L) North Star Ice
(L) NSP
(L) Old Dutch Foods, Inc.
(L) Pepsi Cola Bottling Co.
(L) Ed. Phillips & Sons Co.
(L) Pogreba Distributing, Inc.
(L) Prior Wine Co.
(L) Quality Wine & Spirits Co.
(L) Royal Crown Beverage Co.
(L) Southwest Suburban Publishing
(L) Thorpe Distributing Co.
(L) Twin City Wine Co.
(G) Petty Cash
(G) Froberg & Penberthy, P.A.
(G) Acro-Minnesota, Inc.
(G) Albinson
(G) American Linen Supply Co.
(G) Artworks
(G) Widmer, Inc.
(G) Bacon Drugs
(G) Driskill's Super Value
PURPOSE AMOUNT
Void 0.0
Insp. & Appraisal-Eureka Rd. $ 400.00
4th Qtr. Water Purchase '86 1,335.27
Cty Charge - Special Assess. 61.60
Refund of CUP - Planning 169.12
Annual Institute - Bldg Officials 90.00
Mileage - 12/26/86 thru 1/7/87 7.25
Telephone Svc - City Hall/PW/Parks 335.22
City-Wide Electricity 1,142.82
Membership Dues - Vogt 85.00
01/03/87 Payroll - PERA 1,131.50
01/03/87 Payroll - ICMA 440.00
01/03/87 Payroll - FWH,FICA,Medi. 3,644.03
01/03/87 Payroll - SWH 714.12
01/03/87 Payroll - Credit Union 32.00
01/03/87 Payroll - Income W/H Order 140.50
01/03/87 Payroll - Union Dues 77.50
Employee Health Ins. - Jan. '87 444.55
Walk-in Unit Repair 43.00
Liquor Purchases 717.69
Pop Purchases 413.75
Beer/Pop/Mise Purchases 3,789.99
Liquor/Wine Purchases 1,486.03
Beer Purchases 5,246.18
Laundry Service 36.20
Wine Purchases 2,560.44
Cigarette/Mise Purchases 777.64
Beer/Pop Purchases 4,598.70
Advertising 94.58
Utilities 133.70
Alarm Service - Security 236.65
Mise Purchases 193.00
Utilities 271.72
Mise Purchases 102.73
Pop Purchases 579.45
Liquor/Wine 397.66
Beer/Pop/Mise Purchases 3,010.06
Wine Purchases 14.56
Wine Purchases 802.74
Pop Purchases 81.70
Advertising 556.80
Beer Purchases 8,181.50
Wine Purchases 493.54
Reimb - MNSS Mtg/Misc Supp./Equip M. 23.31
Legal Fees - December, 1986 2,653.75
Computer Furniture - Planning 438.63
Planimeter - Planning 395.00
Laundry Serv - City Hall/PW 186.27
Graphic Supplies - Planning 22.83
S.E. Area Water - Pay Voucher #1 13,300.48
Name Tags - Shaw's Apprec. Party 4.28
Food For Council Mtg. 32.62
- 1 -
CHECK NO
050004
050005
050006
050007
050008
050009
050010
050011
050012
050013
050014
050015
050016
050017
050018
050019
050020
050021
050022
050023
050024
050025
050026
050027
050028
050029
050030
050031
050032
050033
050034
050035
050036
050037
050038
.
.
GENERAL & LIQUOR FUNDS - BILLS PAID SINCE JANUARY 7, 1987
TO WHOM PAID
(G) GFOA
" Long Lake Ford Tractor, Inc.
" Earl F. Andersen & Assoc.
" Lake Mtka. Plumbing Supp.
" Matthias, Roebke & Maiser
" H.C. Mayer & Sons, Inc.
" Metro West Insp. Services
" Midwest Animal Svc.
" Minnegasco
" MN Suburban Newspapers
" Wm. Mueller & Sons, Inc.
" Munitech, Inc.
" Navarre Hdwe
" NSP
" Perry's Truck Repair & Welding
" Photo Factory
" Satellite Industies, Inc.
" Tonka Auto & Body Supply
" Water Products Co.
" Waste Mgnt - Savage
" Wayzata Implement
" Weekly News, Inc.
" Wayzata Auto Svc.
" Conunissioner of Revenue
" Conunissioner of Revenue
" Janice M. Haugen
" Robert Rascop
" Government Training Svc.
(G&L)The Bank Excelsior
" M.A.M.A.
(G&L)Public Empl. Retire. Assoc.
(G) ICMA Retirement Corporation
" City-County Credit Union
" Child Support Enforcement Unit
" Conunissioner of Revenue
PAYROLL CHECK LIST
200915
200916
200917
200918
200919
200920
200921
200922
200923
200924
200925
200926
(G)
Void
Daniel J. Vogt
Sandra L. Kennelly
Susan A. Niccum
Shelly L. Trinka
Evelyn T. Beck
Kathleen G. Schwankl
Bradley J. Nielsen
Patricia R. Helgesen
Bradley J. Nielsen
Charles S. Davis
Dennis D. Johnson
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
PURPOSE
AMOUNT
Book - Price of Advice - Fina. $ 19~00
Chain Saw - Public Works 205.00
Street/Traffic Control Signs 732.86
Repair Shop Sink Drain 4.77
Nov. '86 Financial Statements 320.00
Gas/Diesel Fuel/Hydraulic Fluid 949.33
Nov. '86 Bldg Insp 1,640.00
Animal Control 507.35
Boulder Bridge Pump Hse 112.01
Ad for Skating Rink Attendants 50.40
Winter Mix/Ice Control/Belting 920.23
Maint. Service - Jan '87 4,314.70
Genl Supplies/Equip Maint/Bldg Main 393.00
City-Wide Electricity 1,446.91
Truck Repair - Public Works 406.00
Slides Developed - Planning 4.65
Chemical Toilets - Parks 80.36
1 Socket - Small Tools - Public Works 3.91
Water Meters For Resale 824.98
Garbage Removal - City Hall 74.00
Snowblower - Parks Capital Imp. 812.00
Legal Notices 37.40
Equip Maint - Public Works 111.10
December, 1986 Sales Tax 9,220.83
December, 1986 Fuel Tax 45.03
Refund of PERA Deduction - 01/03/87 6.00
Refund of PERA Deduction - 01/03/87 8.00
Conf.- Newly Elected Off. - Brancel 25.00
01/17/87 Payroll - FWH, FICA, Med. 3,804.01
M.A.M.A. Mtg - 1/21/87 - Vogt 10.00
01/17/87 Payroll - PERA 1,190.57
01/17/87 Payroll - ICMA 465.00
01/17/87 Payroll - Credit Union 32.00
01/17/87 Payroll - Income W/H Order 140.50
01/17/87 Payroll - SWH 754.43
Subtotal - General
Subtotal - Liquor
Void
80 hrs
80 hrs
80 hra
80 hrs
80 hrs
99.5 hra
80 hrs
64.75 hra
Motor Vehicle
82 hrs
80 hrs
- 2 -
47,224.61
44,574.38
0.0
952.29
702.47
462.32
321.67
590.08
653.47
774,.13
452 .14~
123.36
411.10
590.53
GENERAL &~QUOR FUNDS - BILLS PAID SINCE ~UARY 7, 1987
CHECK NO TO WHOM PAID PURPOSE AMOUNT
200927 (G) Daniel J. Randall 82.5 hrs $ 614.68
200928 It Howard Stark 80 hrs 532.07
200929 It Ralph A. Weh1e 82 hrs 529.77
200930 It Donald E. Zdrazil 80 hrs 807.01
200931 It Martey Jakel 46 hrs 192.27
200932 It Christopher G. O'Neill 40.5 hrs 179.61
200933 It Randall E. Bush 48 hrs 195.67
200934 It James P. Woog 40.5 hrs 146.15
200935 It Donald R. Abresch 5.5 hrs 23.05
200936 (L) Russell R. Marron 80 hrs 486.79
200937 It Robert F. Nash 42.5 hrs 206. 13
200938 It Christopher Schmid 42 hrs 153.25
200939 It Donald Tharalson 9 hrs 42.04
200940 It Ross Nasset 32 hrs 143.72
200941 It John F. Thompson 17 hrs 80.70
200942 It John F. Josephson 55 hrs 215.86
200943 It William F. Josephson 80 hrs 520.75
200944 It Susan M. Latterner 36 hrs 140.59
200945 It Steven D. Maeger 77 hrs 319.68
200946 It Dean H. Young 80 hrs 486.82
200947 It Joel S. Bovee 23 hrs 111. 55
Sub-Total - General $ 9,253.84
Sub-Total - Liquor $ 2,907.88
Total - General $ 56,478.45
Total - Liquor $47,482.26
- 3 -
.
.
MAYOR
Robert Raseop
COUNCI L
Jan Haugen
Tad Shaw
Kristi Stover
Robert Gagne
ADMINISTRATOR
Daniel J. Vogt
CITY OF
SHOREWOOD
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD . SHOREWOOD. MINNESOTA 55331 . (612) 474-3236
MEMO TO: Mayor and Counci1members
FROM, Dan Vogt ~
DATE: January 14, 1987
SUBJECT: Permanent Appointment - Shelly Trinka
As of this date, Shelly Trinka has completed the six month probationary
period per the Employee Policy in the position of Secretary/Receptionist.
Shelly has proven to be an excellent employee and is dedicated to the
position that she has accepted.
Shelly Trinka is therefore recommended for permanent appointment to the
position of Secretary/Receptionist.
This item appears on the Consent Agenda of your January 26 Council Meeting
for you consideration.
DJV/slt
A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore
'-
o
"
.
.
MAYOR
Robert Rascop
COUNCI L
Jan Haugen
Tad Shaw
Kristi Stover
Robert Gagne
ADMINISTRATOR
Daniel J. Vogt
CITY OF
SHOREWOOD
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD . SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 · (612) 474-3236
FROM:
Mayor and Councilmembers
Dan Vagt ~
January 22, 1987
MEMO TO:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Corridor Study - Council Recommendation to the Metropolitan Council
As you are aware, the cities that participated in the Trunk Highway 7 (T.H.7)
Corridor Study have been directed to have the City's official reaction and
recommendation on the results of the Corridor Study to the Metropolitan
Council by January 31, 1987. This report is intended to give you an outline
of the response of the City. This outline has been compiled by staff and is
intended to incorporate the response staff perceives as the City Council re-
action to the Corridor Study taking into account the meetings that the Council
has had relative to this issue (Minutes of the November 5, 1986 meeting are
attached). This report is merely a draft of the final response to the Corridor
Study and is awaiting your final determination. Please amend as you see fit.
You may wish to include comments made by residents at past meetings on specific
segments of the study.
POSITION OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD RELATING TO THE T.H.7 CORRIDOR STUDY
The response of the City of Shorewood will be centered around the recommended
alternatives as presented by BRW, Inc. (The Consultant) in the final draft of
the Trunk Highway 7 Corridor Study dated November, 1986. However, in some
cases we may suggest another alternative to the study for the specific area
being considered. Should any of the recommended alternatives be altered or
abandoned in favor of another design alternative as a result of the comments
made by the cities, the City of Shorewood would like the opportunity to respond
at that time.
T.H. lOl/MINNETONKA HIGH SCHOOL
Although this area of the Corridor Study is not located in Shorewood, changes in
traffic patterns will undoubtedly have an effect on the Vine Hill Road inter-
section located in Shorewood. The Shorewood City Council recommends that
Alternative 2 be favored over the recommended Alternative 1 and that improvements
in this area should not be tied to improvements in the Vine Hill Road area. Also,
prior to making final decisions as to the ultimate design of this area, a closer
look should be taken at moving T.H. 7 to the north.
A Residential Cpmmunity on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore
0,11
.
.
VINE HILL ROAD/OLD MARKET ROAD
The City of Shorewood strongly objects to Alternative 4 as the recommended
design for this segment of T.H. 7. The high cost of this Alternative with
the City of Shorewood shouldering a good deal of the financial burden is a
major factor in this objection. Alternative 1 continues to be preferred by
Shorewood due to the fact that it accomplishes a number of items identified
as important to the functionofT.H. 7 at the least amount of cost not only
to the taipayers within Shorewood but also the State and Federal Agencies con-
tributing to the construction costs.
EXCELSIOR AREA EAST
The City of Shorewood agrees that Alternative 3 is preferred for the segment
of this study area which is located in Shorewood. It is Shorewood's determin-
ation that the portion of this study area which is located in the City of
Excelsior should receive comment from that City. However, as part of Alternative
3, the City does not agree that a frontage road along the south side of T.H. 7
from Christmas Lake Road to Old Market Road is necessary. Slip ramp closure at
Radisson Inn Road and Radisson Entrance is acceptable.
EXCELSIOR AREA WEST
The City of Shorewood finds that none of the alternatives offered by the con-
sultant for that segment of this study area located in Shorewood is acceptable.
It is Shorewood's determination that the portion of this study area which is lo-
cated within the City of Excelsior should receive comment from that City. The
Council suggests that this study area be looked at again in an effort to find
more acceptable alternatives with regards to the portions located in Shorewood.
T.H. 41 AREA
The recommeded alternative for this area (Alternative 2) is acceptable to the
City of Shorewood. More spec-ifically, the access to Lake Linden Drive could
be closed, the north half of the T.H. 41 intersection should concentrate on good
geometric design and any frontage road on the north side of T.H. 7 should be
placed as far north as possible at the intersection for maximum detachment. The
five lane design with center left-turn lane is acceptable.
LAKE MINNEWASHTA AREA
The City of Shorewood agrees with the consultant that Alternative 2 is preferred
in this area of the study. Specifically, the City agrees that Seamans Drive should
be realigned to allow detachment of Yellowstone Trail at the intersection, to re-
align the entrance to Freeman Park to align with Dogwood Avenue in Chanhassen
and to widen T.H. 7 to five lane design with center left-turn lane.
The City of Shorewood agrees that comments on specific design plans should be
solicited from surrounding communities that are affected by improvements being
proposed along T.H. 7 at the time of submittal to the Community.
Upon the final determination of the City Council as to the T.H. 7 Corridor
Study, a Resolution will be drafted which adopts this position paper along
with any amendments you wish to make as the official response of the City of
Shorewood.
cc: Brad Nielsen
Enclosures
-2-
SPECIAL COUNCIL MIIUTES
WEDNESDAY, NOVE~ 5, 1986
page two
.
REVIEW OF HIGHWAY 7 CORRIDOR STUDY DRAFT REPORT
Planner Nielsen and Administrator Vogt went over a brief overview
of the process that has brought the Corridor Study to its present
form. It was indicated that the study is nearing its final form
and that a final public review of the draft report will take place
on Wednesday, November 12, 1986, at 7:00 P.M. at the Minnetonka
City Hall.
Each segment of the Corridor along Highway 7 which was studied by
the consultant was reviewed by Planner Nielsen. Comments for each
segments are shown below.
LAKE MINNEWASHTA AREA
Planner Nielsen reviewed the recommendation of the consultant for
the areas that pertain to Shorewood. The Council agreed with the
Consultant-recommendation to realign Seamans Drive to detach
Yellowstone Trail, to realign the entrance to Freeman Park to align
with Dogwood Avenue in Chanhassen and to widen Highway 7 to five (5)
lanes with a center left-turn lane.
TRUNK HIGHWAY 41 AREA
Planner Nielsen reviewed the consultant's recommendation. The
Council agreed that the access opening for Lake Linden Drive from
TH7 could be closed and that the north half of the TH41 intersec-
tion with TH7 should concentrate on good geometric design. Also
any frontage road west of TH41 on the north side of TH7 should be
placed as far north as possible for maximum detachment at the in-
tersection. The five (5) lane proposal was also agreeable.
EXCELSIOR AREA WEST
A review of the recommendation from the consultant pertaining to
the areas of TH7 in Shorewood was made by Planner Nielsen. Topo-
graphic maps of the area were reviewed. It was found that the
proposal called for'the location of a frontage road approximately
40 feet above the existing elevation of Highway 7. Many alterna-
tives to this proposal were discussed regarding the proposed
creation of a new intersection in the vicinity of Chaska Road and
Galpin Lake Road. After lengthy discussion, the Council agreed
that alternative 2 as the preferred alternative is unacceptable
and that alternative 1 is more preferable but question the need
for a frontage road in this area and also question the need to
upgrade Mayflower Road. The Council suggested that the consul-
tant "go back to the drawing board" relative to design of said
intersections.
EXCELSIOR AREA EAST
Planner Nielsen reviewed the recommendation of the consultant
relative to this area which is located in Shorewood. The City
Council agreed that alternative 3 is preferred in this area but
did not agree that a frontage road is necessary from Old Market
Road to Christmas Lake Road. Slip ramp closure was also acceptable
to Radisson Inn Road and Radisson Entrance.
-2-
SPECIAL COUNCIL .UTES
WEDNESDAY, NOVEM 5, 1986
page three
.
TH 101/MINNETONKA HIGH SCHOOL
. .
The recommended alternative for this area was reviewed by Planner
Nielsen. After discussing the consultant's recommended alterna-
tive for this area and a comparison of other alternatives in this
area of the study, the Council recommended that alternative 2 is
preferred over alternative 1 and that the improvements in this
area should not be tied to improvements in the Vine Hill Road
area. Also, the consultant should take a closer look at moving
TH7 to the north as discussed previously.
VINE HILL ROAD/OLD MARKET ROAD
Planner Nielsen reviewed the recommended alternative for this
area. After discussion of the preferred alternative, the City
Council voiced a strong objection to alternative 4 and recommended
alternative 1 as the preferred alternative for this area. It was
discussed that the recommended alternative is the most expensive
of which Shorewood would shoulder most of the financial burden
especially in the area of right-of-way acquisition at Vine Hill
Road.
The Council was reminded of the public meeting scheduled for
Wednesday, November 12 to discuss the Draft Report of the
Corridor Study. Members Haugen and Stover indicated that they
would attend along with Administrator Vogt and Bob Morast of OSM.
ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Rascop moved, seconded by Haugen to adjourn the November 5,
1986 Special Council Meeting at 10:45 P.M.
RESPECFULLY SUBMITTED,
Mayor Rascop
Daniel J. Vogt
City Administrator
-3-
~
11'"
.
.
January 21, 1987
Dear Council Members:
I would appreciate it if the council would address my
problem. I would like to develope the following property,
20095 Excelsior Blvd. and 5405 St. Albans Bay Rd.. The prop-
erty is currently zoned R-2A.
If this is done, I would need an access to old Excelsior
Blvd. (see exhibit A) in order to exit to the east. Any new
traffic on old Excelsior Blvd. has not met with any approval
from area residents.
My solution, is that the intersection planned by Shorewood
on Hwy. 7 in front of my property be a full four-way inter-
section so that traffic on St. Albans Bay Rd. has east access
on Hwy. 7. In turn, this would lower the traffic count on old
Excelsior Blvd.
Continued Success,
~~
E. G. Rosenthal
cc: Brad Nielson
~~(j
" /"
. ,,/~/-:
",./ .
/'0vv Y .A'
,,/ ~!
/' /' I
~v::/ ....... /"' /' i
//,/~~~;' /' "':
. ~~/'
,/ I'
'/0"'\;0...----.,
/' ,
E'fHJb IT - A
r
....
---
-.J'Q, ./
'r
\
\
\
\ ' ..~ !
\ " :-:> ~!/ \ . /
t;,\ :.\,,?(,;.~
'. . .'\'\,;:"'\, .,,/
v~. rr-'
... 't, I
I
"",-
/
,/
./
,/
./
/'
......
/
".
".,
\
f".
'/.Y
........ ---' ,
.I, _
r',
( ,1
I
}
t
/~
~/ i
//1
/ ~
"~.~
-'\ 'i
) I
1
f
,~)(
I 'f
I
I
I
i
i
i ," '
., L,-". .
~,,~J
I
I I
L;----
I
I
-_.~.,.
f j
... '.J
''t, ...
1 ~~';
i., "'..
t
I,
I
I
L.
-, '.
: ~ ,-
I .
+- ....
I
I
L____...
.. .~
...
(( ;."
,II !
VI I
~ i
~ / !
~ I
,/
~ /
Q
'r
.~
it
..-/
~
J'::4..
~
0'
Iq.
. ,-
'f..,"'
I
I
,) ~
ct
~
(:,
~
1-
Q.
"~i &
r,.')
',1, _)
(.)
, ~
, \,)
\ } ~~
\ 1-
\
. /'
\ ...-
\./\ /'
\ /
),/
: ,..],s.
: ~.(.
'\
I " :" '.' :'*, I
,..,.'(-m~,'..!
. ._,.,..;;,(\-.;c.'.",.,:"~",~,, .
, '.. . '>'!......,...,...: -', ........ '....
-",' ,;~.",,\.t;;,,:,.,":. .,.: ",""', _".:',
," .....,
....--~--- ~-..-- ~ ----..- -.. .~
2.T~_~'=_f2~ ~,
__ ._,- .....;'J1""
~...'~.....,
\vt/
.---
,..--...
I
j
/'
/
,-",;,,,-
,IfA't ~~,~-.
.--./"
. 'l
" y\()J1/
./
/"
,/
/
,/
/'
I
t
I,
i'
.
I
.
~
I
I
. I
!
i
)
1
~
, 10
MEMORANDUM
.
.
MAYOR
Robert Rascop
COUNCl L
Jan Haugen
Tad Shaw
Kristi Stover
Robert Gagne
ADMINISTRATOR
Daniel J. Vogt
(
CITY OF
SHOREWOOD
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD. SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 . (612).474-3236
FROM: BRAD NIELSEN
TO: PLANNING COMMISSION, MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
DATE: 13 JANUARY 1987
RE: MANITOU PROPERTIES SELF-STORAGE FACILITY - C.U.P.
FILE NO.: 405 (86.54)
BACKGROUND
Pursuant to Section 200.20 Subd. 4c. of the Shorewood Zoning Ordinance, Manitou
Properties has applied for a conditional use permit to build a self-storage
facility at 5620 Manitou Road (see Site Location map - Exhibit A, attached).
The subject property is divided between the R-1C, Single-family Residential,
and C-3, General Commercial zoning districts. Site data is contained in Exhibit B,
attached.
Land use and zoning surrounding the site are as follows:
North - Single-family residential and a church, zoned R-1C; and undeveloped,
zoned R-3A and R-C
West Undeveloped, zoned R-1C
South - Single-family,czoned R-1C; and commercial, zoned C-3
East Shopping Center (in Tonka Bay), zoned commercial
ANALYSIS/RECOMMENDATIONS
In preliminary reviews of the applicant's development proposal two major issues
have been identified - 1) site drainage; and 2) land use marketability. As of
this writing, information submitted to-date is considered inadequate. The developer
has, however, indicated that the required information will be available prior to -
the public hearing on Tuesday. Assuming this information will be adequate, this
report will concentrate on the specific requirements of the Zoning Ordinance.
-
(
..
A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore
7
. ,
.
.
Re: Manitou Properties C.U.P.
13 Ja.nuary 1987
..;
A. Section 200.22 (C-3 Requirements)
1. Setbacks. The proposed facility meets or exceeds the requirements of the
C-3 district. Specifically, the building will be 15 feet from the south
side, 50 feet from the R-1C boundary to the west and the R-3A boundary to
the north, and 150 feet from the front property line.
It should be noted that the front of the site has been labeled for future
connnercial development. While this is not viewed as a problem, the City
should require that no further driveway access be allowed onto County Road
19. Consequently, any future development must share the proposed access
with the self-storage facility.
2. Building Requirements. Most of the proposed structure is a single story
in height, with the exception of the office and caretaker residence which
is two stories (see Exhibit D). The proposed structures will be constructed
of decorative concrete block with a metal fascia. Unless we are informed
otherwise, it is assumed that the materials will be similar to those shown
in photographs previously submitted by the applicant. Although these
photographs show steel columns between storage compartment doors, any of
those which are subject to exposure to vehicular traffic should be required
to be concrete or masonry.
B. Section 200.20 Subd. 4c. (C.U.P. Requirements)
1. Landscaping/screening. Much of the site is heavily wooded and the need
for additional landscaping is therefore limited. Since this existing
vegetation can only enhance the compatibility of the facility with
surrounding land uses, it is recommended that construction limits be staked
out on the site prior to the start of any work. Snow fences should be
erected to ensure that construction limits are strictly observed.
It is suggested that a landscape plan be prepared showing additional land-
scaping around the northwest corner of the facility. Materials used should
be coniferous or dense deciduous. Also, proposed trash facilities should
be located within a masonry enclosure compatible with the architecture of
the proposed buildings.
2. The proposed buildings form a complete enclosure. Openings at the west
end and at the entry are provided with chain link fence and gates.
3. A security gate has been provided for after hours access.
4. The applicant should be aware that hours of operation are limited to
7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m., Sunday through Thursday, and 7:00 a.m. to 12:00
midnight, Friday and Saturday.
5. The applicant has submitted a lighting plan (see Exhibit E). Proposed
lights will be low intensity and mounted on the building walls.
- 2 -
. .
.
, ., ._H.
Re: Manitou Properties C.U.P.
13 January 1987
6. Setbacks and building heights' comply with the C-3 District (lee A. preceding)~
7. All storage must be confined to the proposed structures.
8., Use of all structures is strictly limited to storage except the proposed
caretaker residence and office. The proposed apartment must be used by,
and only by, a caretaker or manager.
9. The proposed circulation and parking areas must be paved.
10. The parking area and driveway must be curbed with concrete, and parking must
be striped.
It should be noted that the proposed driveway appears to be too steep.
Des~gn and location of the driveway should be subject to review and approval
by the City and County Engineers. No work should be allowed to start until
the applicant has obtained an entry permit from Hennepin County.
11. Since circulation areas are approximately the same width as city streets,
loading should not require backing onto the street.
,
12. Prior to commencement of any work, the applicant must submit estimates
for site improvements (grading, drainage, laQdscaping and parking). From
these estimates a letter of credit shall be required to ensure completion
of the improvements.
While the applicant has supplied evidence of financial backing (see Exhibit H),
prior to commencement of any work he must provide evidence of financial
commitment for review and approval by the City Attorney.
C. Additional Comments/Requirements.
1. Future Development. While the City acknowledges that the front of the site
may be further developed at some later date, approval of the C.U.P. does
not endorse or ensure any specific use of the site.
The record should also show that the developer has chosen to landlock the
R-IC portion of his site. In doing so he takes a risk as to the future
development of that portion of the property. The City should keep this
property in mind at such time as development occurs to the west of the site.
2. Drainage. Proposed drainage must be approved by both the City Engineer and
the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. For purposes of this report it
should be mentioned that the pond must be sized to accommodate the proposed
future commercial development as well as the self-storage facility.
Also, since drainage to the north will be concentrated at the outlet for
the pond, the developer must obtain approval of the property owner to the
north for the change in drainage.
- 3 -
"'.
. '
c~'----'A - J U /_
I
:1 J,~ / :f:)"
~ "'-,I!
~ J .. U
. \~~
~ lIe:::.-: ,eo' \
/ :
: , "y/
-
..
, Ie
~\ \\ \
\ \
\ \ \
~\ \
~
l,\ \
\ '.OM' .
\
~-- ~.
~I-
......Ji1 -
..
..
-
I j:
: en':>
.
-- - --J
m_____um
I _ I
I I
--- I
I
------
c:s
0:
--------
..
I I ,
~ ---
, -
Q
..- ~)
-------- -'-
.- --it n .. II'~OO'
. . 'Vl
.
d .a
-------- ~~
0:
.
.
J
.
.
: .J--
.-
,
-LL1
LLI
-J
~:e
<(
-S.~
--r j) L
~ I"YlI
\;\.. - - - -'
I
: \ '"tJ J nOllN\'W
I) .\ --------
\ ffi
: / \ <5
f ~ ~ ~ ~ f-~~~~~~~~
~ C~ ~
7?t'~ ~ '\.
, /1
\ \ \
.1"' ___\
I j,
f
__u___ - :--- - -71
o OOOM3!103M / /
If
- -..-, -
----
Exhibit A
SITE LOCATION
Manitou~Prbperties - C.U.P.
'\.,
I
. '
.
.
... ~. 4LIIIOtV~tJ ",~
t'~It..tJ f)"T~
!
.",
t
~i
,.F ;', '-..~I1t~~~.eM'
. I
iL...,.dlLi ~i L L
~
. wll4f ~...J'
; r, " i
~.A~
1!l'IJ1L.r1ltJ. Jl.eAlJI~
104e.l....T'I'1.-.) .~.. ~~~I=.....,.
"
r
1!!l\J'L.~~ ~",.,.
....... 4VfC'U6a.
..~
"'(,I~t.O ........
!
tt..,.. (....,Jt.LL ~.
...... ~ ,
~ ..~~~.!.
.aut ..-r~
'"
JIt.
~~
'.
~.~ (atoI. tM1~.
.....". """".1
4.... ;
-n~
I
..
......
1. .,,~
_~tJ. ~~&D
~\.... ~0IfI.
, ~...
i<'
,o::!
......w
o..1f.,
urlL.lTI~
~.... (~T~~"erL.~~{ ~
~IWL (otJ ~ J,J&.L.L)
~11"1 (Ll~ -'tOo ,..)
~..v.'-L (~~~.~
.~1-
,l~'~::
~.'~~,.."t: .. :.~ :,' :'~ ~~_' ;
~17t;}~"i~~ '
,.<M...t'. v.~.,,~.' L
.~t~'ft;'.'j:;~;':_
~.'.:'~,~.t~~::,f": '~:," i
'~r~.IM~)
, ....,.,..:.
.; .." ~t1
.....:
. ~'. '" !
....
. f' c.; i
~... I
.~
.......!
i
'''-1
~~'e:t/~~~.
~~ -, I
;.,~.
,......:
4M,-.;
l"l~'
......
..,.
~..,
..0 ..,..
"HI
,.
I-
.-
.-
;.,],
"',J::,,.,._
. ...llIt:....
Exhibit B
SITE DATA
-
"
'''l.,
..."
\J
.
.t
q",1.
.,~..
..tI<
,,,-
:!
Q.. i-
.t
.....
(.
"
,
tl
It.
..
-.
ill
Exhibit C
SIT~ PUAN
"""''7,,,;,,'~''i:,,"~.'''-''.,' ':
I.
.'.11.. '!
'.d :;: II
, " fil
1< 1~1
'" fij.
~ Iii
l
'~ .
U." \
i' f
.
~11r1
~...
"
......,...
I
:z
"
~ t I'
..- l.~
t\ 1
I ..
r
.. III
-.1 i
.
'! t
.
.. ilf
it ..
il'
,~ I..
~I 1) .it ~l
1:11
~I
'",
.
) ~
#,
~
,
--.,., - ".-.- .-.- :--
~~ 6jf
,
:1&
,~l
Exhibit 0
BUILDING ELEVATIONS
',-
~
~ ~
~)- "
o.<t
~-'
.. ,,. ~.o
CI~ ~~
~ .
~j f~
t
Ii
4".j
~:..
I
'~~o.
~ f.o
~. ~:~
t t.
0;;& c'~
.'
J ,
1 ,I
!~. .!
I i
:1 Z'o.~1.o. ~'z1
, " !
/1.=_'
r--' , --..
I
: I
-,3
~
~
(
~ 4-
I
~
t. .. .
~
> f
i ~
~ r 1
~
,
\
\
"-
I
-JI
-. I
-- I
"
II
~;jt
/
7
()
~
III
.J
.u-
.~
....:..
~ "
~~~
1
-;..
I! ~ -........ 1
1+
.r ,i.
.'.,- ;
- , .---1ili1JLL.~;!
._~' "
,<," ':'
_.' '. ',:':,
- ':~"';.':',;!
i"; ..,,,~ . :
---1
---1
'-1
t" .........--_..
t i ---
.j
I
....-1
t
f---- -
...________~~ .-<Lla_'~;,
: : ~ ~,; I
.j"
j';, d1', :;
-- _....l~ILh~!2:j:
I ;;
I
.. ' , I 1 . , ~I
d! . :1
'!tl';;:!:f:
!l L ~! 11 .. Ii' I,
,i":1 !~llH~
__~l l'-'-r,~~;n.,~.,
, i
r 1:1.tt1i
~ I I rzJ'!i
., I ';, I,,;, :;.,
o.,' I ': I,..
I I ! ' : I:" .
l, .;:.,.
l.~ ~---.._...~-,...__._. .~'"-,,,._.-
!
, :j
i I
, j
'Z
()
~
~
111
..1
.t
I.
".. ' ','i i
:-1'!:
i III"
..
:r~
~:.
fl ..
~..
7.:::.
-~
I..
,[.1;
I
I:' .~
:'L
.~~.....
.li-':
. Jr""'~;
"iIIIIIIl....._', '....w'."" ,~ 1'1" Vr~:&'" ..,..-
'n"-'-"'"--
tlllll'~'
""'-'....
. .... ~_.~.__.'m__~__'.__~__...-.-- -~-'--"--'--- ..--~-~._._,._-~~----_.._.
Exhibit E
L IG'HTING'PLAN
:'_ ,,>,-- .'~~~d "~~1'~~f~'.J'6;.~I.:.U"" r'h'7.,' f ;J:. f'~~;:~>~\ ~~/:JJ~IJ.Uj
.- . - "- ~ ~.. ~ :'-. - -
~ .' ,'. .',,-' .... -~ ~ r~.~',..'"~~".,, ,,' . ........!..I~g~ ,.... J ~~. )=.~... .' :.11 I ~ ~ J7~ .~ ~A J.. ,.... ~ .~
~ IIIIiIII " ,'......'-'..., ~.'. '. -:./. ~. ~~ ~. U ~ r ~ ~ ~~
..,.,...~.:., .<,\..,~",,~....:.,~.~J :;IJ, '.'.' :....~......:.c..~ct~.'-..,'....'...~..-....,: ....>...:.... .' .'...... ....'.11 . '. ."& 1.' !J~1'l. ~ ~ .'... f ~~:I./ ;.~i
.'., '","'-' '-'~' ":"'~~ .,.,>..... ......... . .,' ," ;.....- ~". . /" ,'. ~r- ...., --~W
~~" <.~. "]iOi'. .~. ..~"'::;..~,_~.... ....,... ~. \'. .;. :<..'-:<.' ~" ,.:. ..I... L 1\.. .. j' ..; ~ till ~~~ f' 01, -.,. ~ I .'- ; .I~ ..... . '. f.. 1 '.~
.~,~~,;.:... :'\.-, ...~~......' ". J ,'r' -- ~......". ..:..., ~', '.'. ." "," L........ .'." n ;Jf;'l\ '~', ~ ,'. T ~ i ~,.~ ,~lri....~~.~T.. ,1. . / .. < IJ
,'~"~ "4 ..~ '.... ",',,-.,"il'. : ~.. T " ;. . ., '-i:::;T . .~r .. l"; . .. .... - tt~.. .1: '.J. "Iht'. '. '. t! ,
'., ". """ :"....J, .~- '.. _ ". ---:I.."-L "', v '. "'_ ..
. ...~. .~, .' ~..j;~...~ j~' ::.~~ r: r~ ii- :""~ ...i.~ ~.,: ~~r'" ...;, ,:..:, ~""~;;;' (j';;t~... t . . ~ ~" ":. -/-: ./. .~,.. -;;.~ - .:.
'. "'--.;~ ': . . V'. . . '. .(.. . . L . '/ . . ., _. . , '- .,-, J'. , ; ,:' _ ~ ~~ ~~. . ,... .
~~~~ .~~. .:--. .... I ./. .....':...:: .' ; . J I. ." ..... I. ~ '. . . t / ~ ~ " ~ j .:~ . .';'. ,,~.......' ~"~,.
~'\ ~~: ~ "'c- - - 1 ~ - :;.7", ~;1- .( ~.~ -:~ . ~ >:I:~" ~. "'. -w~, ~:;, . '.' " ;:" .~ ~ .
~,~,.. ~~-:~<. :..,~ '~. "~""'..'- ~.~~'911"'LI/ '.' ~,~--- 1,,--;1 ~ 0 f... ~ "/. :'. .' 1
,~~~~: ';i ~,_I \~.. i , ~ \-.~;!i~~J~_~/t., A~')1.'1. 'e))J~~,W.:'~ ;::. "~ 't~........:, 1.\: 't ;
<~~<.' ~~~ ~ ' " n r ~ .. ~ , I I
<'''''''' lI..."",'0 ". . 7. . j -.. J /. .'#~ ,..... / ~-... ~ J .,.. ~. I' '.' I .... t-ra t te.' #' _,:
",-'> ,..... ,~,'.." .',: ..L .,~ ri ~ of . J Ill!' 1- 1
~~,::,>,l~.~~?S~, .~. I " ~~~. __ ..- . =-= ; i -.,. " ~. =-- :_1', ,"I'~ , r ~M.' , .~
.~~~.:~~~~'~ ~-/ IL~- -- ,.-_I//! t:::~ ;::;:: ----I' ,"" \J:U:1,1!
~.~~1~1::-:~~ -- - ;~~ - - ~." - 1~~:- ~ ~~\ .~~ ~'=~'!~;~.Il' ~:"{; ( <i~~~
W' -- N'" -- ---l~ . ---.-. -.. ~,.# ,...- ". - - -- .....).~; ~ t:: ~ ~ .=. - I:. .. J I : ~. ..' .
-.... ..... -. -:--.:, . I. i. I . I 1 I... . L
r " ~=~'I _ _ ~ .:::- .. ~.r' ::~~,- ~. '.~ :.:: ..~_ \-l ~~ ~". , .. '" - . ~ .~' t..< ! / / rr'\.~
t. /~,. -. .......". ~. ":~ _..) .' --~. . U '~.." I! / ,'. ..::{
~-_.J. - .. .' ":~':~EE" .<.~ ,"~7 r'I ~ ~ ,..-.. i' ,....' :~l
. _.....1, - . ~W~; ~.~ "N"" . : ..' ') ~" ~
~ . _ _ ~ ~ - . _ _ " ._~ . , . II 'l:,..f. , . .
r '..... ._-. -:-.:-- - flIrl ./ ' /'..' . ~ ". ~. ".; . .. t' ty... \. .......,....':" ". .~ '. J .:.... ~l; \ \.. '. \. .'
~~_ ...... . t. ~ ) .,/' v.......... . >V~. ~- ...~ to :'1\' . i'-.. '. ., ~'. _.' ': .:.}. .. :;1:~; , '- \ .... \..
~..... .' ..,.. , . . 1'\ 1" .,.- ' 1 .. t "'" \... .
t . ... . .... . . . . I ' .." . ' .-"." . .. .-': ~ ' . : . '-.' ,......;., . .;. '. ". \ . . '" : ". . '\ \ '.
~- - ~...- " . , ',' \.
I", .. ...,.... . '.~ ... '. " . .
--.?a '. .. . ~ -....: ~ ',.L' ..... ' .~ ... .. " ' ,;" ~ - .. '\ . ) \ ~\
' _.....-.. ..... . ~ . ... ... ~.. ~".. ........ ~ ..... '. . ....' ... . '! . - '. . . .'. .. . .' ~ ", "-
. .. '.. ._--... _.' .' '. ..... ':It. ..' . - ",. '. .. - ,. .,;' \... . ! . . '-"
~ ....:. . .... ... r .. . .. .... ..'" . . ~. ~. ...... ~ . ---
...(;'?' ~'---t.. :..:....r~~-~:, "r~C4lt\":" .... Ii'. ''\f\':'::, ~'\~ ..:~::.. ....~,. .~' \. . :'''''l:.~'':',--:-.ii~o._t.:~... .~'~Z'. io; ./., ; .' :. \1 . "
.. ....i -- , ,. . .: '.. .l'~' -:.... .; ~j. , :~ '; --;\-A . ;:,;'... -.- :. - .. 1.' .' :.. .. .L'.: ;....'J' .. ',..,.. ~:'.~. . ..... ~ ~~,. -. ~,:':' ~ :' .' ~ .
~ #. . .. ~ '-... . ." . . . .: f",: . ~ =' .' ~ ~".' ~ -': . '"' . 4 .. ".. r." -:p .1> '. '. /.., ':,,: . ~.""" ~;' , :. '. ~ -;-- ~ . ~.. .. ~~ . .\'. . .
. . , . " .'. ~ " , , . . . . ..' "'" ...: . ... ." . I . . "..,
,.'" '\ ..... " . , .., .-" . ::':". '..~'..\ ,'. ::ru" '.....,,'. .~.,'j;':- ~', ..,.'... . ....~. ~. .' \\:
~ ,," . \". ~ . ." ~J' I . : . .. \
~ .' ". . . ~. . '. j
. ~,~_'r .__,. .,..' ,-L.'~-r-L; 1l~,.r._-4>~~C?JC.tZQ---~ ,~.- L~.., I.~. . .]D "-~~7
-~ " ,.r' n'... .....0. '. \ --- _n.\ . bot " , .l='l"I..~' ( .. . i... : ' '- - "
1\ I 4 ~ . .~.. . .' . . ," . ., .' .
1 . " t . '-4 . " ,0; .'.. :.: '. '. . . ..' . "
.. .. ....
. "'-'t
'f
I..,
~ J~;:\~.
6 . -. .
:.:l_'~':> .-
"r '-~ . .~.
L~: :".
."'1""
.,....~-:~
.!".. .
'f;"~',
; ,
~~ ~: /
"
----1--. _._ . _
~c
. .:..-- .~:"
..
'~
......_.,. ,''\0-,'',..: ~.;#...-
..0;,:.\-'.
I-~
~J
....---
_ .__1 ( '.;::::.. ,r--.
..' '-'-. ". I,.. . '
;r! * ..........,/ ......." 0" ... P
TO ~---'...... :,. ~
....
--,
I
,.
l!!::!:'t. yo " .
'. .
~
~r:,
.~...~..
:..
.__.11__...
. f
...
Exhibit F
OFFICE FLOOR PLAN
.,
..;-. . ~
-.
"...~.~ -, ~- ',,;." ';~"L
.....
"jt
"'"
.
'1 .
.....'
. L.: '.
'.
1 t ~.'
. I. ; '. .
'r .. ~'-' ,
.' "";' ~. .~)~
,. ~_:-._: "....,0..
f - ..-'.....
1 f
C "
"
.
..
1
~
I:.
.
r
~ /fJ.~
'.4 .'
. ..
....\....'
'.
..~
.,
...
. ~ ..',
-.it
~r~
}./;.~~,
r~,~-...,.:
~'~::~~
":, ~ _...~~
;;;.;';{
E
J~l
"
So
!.~~','..,'
-:(.
.... .
.,.;.... .
;S';.}
;;,bJ.
-~~
..~
~.
.
':'...M
j~
~{'-~#
~~~
, .
., :;
.. -~
~~_.:'l"'::"-...,..,..' "..,-. "'-:J-. ..- ~..__..~....",.. "',--- '. '-:.'C'P'._'_"'- --,",'~ ....-J'~..~-
;;#- '\., i\~ ... !r...~.1> it, '";'~~)."'_............ .'-.. ...,.1" . ~. " .'4- .- ,..,...w:--. ,:~ '.
, ~''''~~>'$''~~'':' ':,:'-,:.;~~~, ....:.:.:\:o.r. " '. ~ ":."; ".<: ..'.. ,~.. :,:..:~';. " -. :".2";
~~ _:...... .' '4.. .:....~l "_ : N~~,~ :_~. ;4'..... S-r~ '''-;...,. 'It';" .- ... ... C "",," ." .....
j.._.....-:-:..;.~.1'....':-.. ';'_~:.'~4,.:e- \.,.~~.."., A" . \",' i'
t_t"" ~. (....t....~.4... ,.... ~J. ...... ".~. ,'''t.' ,"
"'~... ... ;..... .::-.. ~,....~..,~ t' ~ .,... ~. ..,. ,,"'l, .. ...,.
'.: ... . ~.. .....'. /;...~~:r.". C"").' 'i..,~,1 .' {o.. ,__ ~~ .. '... .. . ~4 .' .
-':.~.:." .,"X.._:J.~";.':":" ..../_~,:.I'!9:.~f't...a(..;L~:-oor~ ' .."" '-, ":.. _,,1 "'.')0. r~'"
,..,.. ,-~~,J\' ._..) '=~. .-...; -"...--:. .11.'-
!"~~ _ .:". .. ~?~, ',l~... ':; ~_' .:\ ;..>t:"4<".:.::" . ". ..~...: ": .~. ..< ~ .. '" I' ..;~. ~ ~
.... ~ 1loj-" ~............'.",r" ..~ ... ,~:.. . '.: ''-' ,J.... \." .. _.... ""I If.. .(
~:""fi"Y;::':';"tt.~' .'.:j/:~~';~:~fk.:~~~':._1:~J.":' .. ' . ~.; ~"~ ~":"'~-'~~T'~' :~'. . ~ 1l I .
. 'W:': .' "~~-r'.~"_~".!-' ~~"}...,~"j\.-...\,~~~~""'''' '~::Y' . ...~~t.\". ' .f- :,c' .
. ...... ~_ ~...,;~......1" ....M:...;..... ;:..1",~~' .....1:1' _.~ '" ~.. " ~ -. . oL f'"
~ ~ _." -.1_.' .....,. ~., tIfi.'" '"!iJ.. '''''' ."" ,-
~... . ,~ .,;.".:;., ". ~Yc'" 'f::7i;t.,. .,'"~ ~ ~ , l:.;';.~',i~"" "'~~, ~~ ..~~~~.~ ....- -!~......~ . 'If.. . ::..: . ~.,;.. :.:~ :.~;.' <.7
f~ r,'" ... ~"'-"". ...r ~"
'. ~,;!-'~~:, ,- t.. ~-tt ~\t 10.,,' tr ~ , . ,~. I · ;s.",
~~j:lo.~~ .-<t,;,t :t''''!~!i','7i~;~: ,,< "..,;,{... r"::.: J,;{:";..-. .'" r' ..... .. ".~"
~~.~-\:;- . ~""'.'~'~""'T ~~'~>':'~~"P'!'.. . ~,.'" ~.
~".~'.~~~" . .:.: - . l>..~-., ~.;t;;~;..': ~ ~'-'
;"--~
t.',
...~-... ...,
:-;
. ...
-~.~
~
...~I.-
'-~ ,~,.
-'-.---.7'tr:
..n~. Ll.
\, \ I;'.
. . I '-
t
I
~_ totIJ!tJ.. _.
,
( . .r
",
~"
;'
~
----..-.. ----- -~.. ----.- _.----
L
,...:-. ..... ......
LMIP~.
Exhibit G
CARETAKER RESIDENCE FLOOR PLAN
.'k,
~
.~..
~"',
5
S
"-
'.
'. . .' -4"
~! It-" t-.:'-
'I ,.....
".~;.1'-~; /.,.;.
I.. ....~. -. .,' J1>--~~"",.
.:: ~,;;~:f{&i
. x.~ ;"; '- :r;(.~"
- .,.;,:t .
.. ~....:--:.
~. ". "".:'
.
D4
M
~
He
9~
",
~
E
L
.
: .
-....
}.. .
. .
, .
.
.
t..
18ank of JIlinnrapo{it( anb 1lCrutSt ClCompanp
809 Nicollet Mall. Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402
Telephone: (612) 340-5500
1.
C\'
I
January 2, 1986
~~1
~~~O
'f&~
City of Shorewood
5755 Country Club Road
Shorewood, MN 55331
RE: Property Located at 5620 Co. Rd. 19 City of Shorewood,
Hennepin County
Legal Description: Lot 26, Aud. Sub. Div. #133
Dear Mayor and Council Members:
The Bank of Minneapolis and Trust Company is in fee title of the above-mentioned ,
property. Manitou Properties, Inc. has entered into a purchase agreement with Bank
of Minneapolis and Trust Company on said property with the intention of building a
mini storage facility on the site.
John T. Bessesen is President of Manitou Properties, Inc. Any assistance you can
give him in obtaining the necessary permits would be greatly appreciated.
Sincerely,
d,:~ hnson~
Presiden and CEO
-
rjc
2471
Exhibit H
LETTER FROM BANK OF MINNEAPOLIS & TRUST CO.
Dat~d 2~ranuary 1987
MRNITOU PH'ERTlES, Inc.
33 10th Rue. S.
Suite 215
Hopkins, MN 55343
.
612 - 935 - 1258
January 16, 1987
City of Shorewood
5755 Country Club Rd.
Shorewood, MN 55331
Att: Brad Nielson
Dear Mr. Nielson,
In analyzing the feasibility of mini-warehouses, several elements should be examined. To begin with
let's review the costs involved in the construction and operation of a self storage facility. This is a
universal type of project. Because of this, we shall look at a hypothetical operation in North Dakota.
This data comes from an example prepared by the National Mini Storage Institute in Washington D.C..
Our composite model will be compared side by side with the projections for our proposed operation, and
the operations statements of an actual local operation in St. Bonifacius. Construction costs of these 3
examples are basically the same.
Another element of concern then might be visibility and the average daily traffic count. The proposed
Shorewood location commands excellent visibility across from a major shopping center and the average
daily traffic count of 7800 ranks high among comparable projects reported on by the National Institute.
Also according to the National Mini Storage Institute, 90% of the population in a metro area are not
even aware of self storage, and 1 out of 30 households in that same urban area will require only 50 sq
ft.. Some of the older projects that were hidden and unsecure caused much of this problem. We plan to
develop a secure visible project.
With the increase of apartment buildings and condominiums in the lake area, we have found through our
conversations with project managers of these facilities that there is a real need for storage of
household and personal property. Business owners around the lake have also indicated that there is not
enough storage space of this type available on a month to month or long term basis. For example the
Tonka Bay boat works, Shorewood Marina, and Excelsior Motor Mart have indicated a need for storage
of small boats and the related equipment.
Other storage needs will now include the lawn and garden equipment, snowmobiles, etc. that was once
allowed as outside storage for residents of Mound and Tonka Bay.
lake Minnetonka boaters who are not residents of the immediate community will also store their boats
and equipment to make a Saturday outing easier.
The enclosed map indicates the locations of other self storage facilities in the metro area. It appears
that there are only 3 other facilities near the proposed project and the Spring Park site is adding on to
support more business. All three report better than 90% occupancy year round.
I'm sure that after you see how the proposed Shorewood project agrees with the operations data of
these other facilities, you will be convinced of how our Self Storage facility will serve the best
interests of the community of Shorewood.
Sincerely,
l J ,) ;
tYr. ~
U v '-it ,d4t.',',/-r'A-..
John T. Bessesen, Pres.
UNIT
SIZE
5x5
5X10
1 Ox1 0
10X15
10X20
10x30
so FT SO FT % OF MONTHLY PERMONTH NJMBEROF ANNUAL COST
PEAUNITALLOCATED TOTAL COSTISOFT PEAUNIT UNITS PEASOFT
25 1600 2.55% $0.56 $14.00 64 $6.72
50 7000 11.15% $0.44 $22.00 140 $5.28
100 11400 18.15% $0.33 $33.00 114 $3.96
150 17400 27.71% $0.28 $42.00 116 $3.36
200 17600 28.03% $0.25 $49.00 88 $2.94
300 7800 12.42% $0.21 $64.00 26 $2.56
62800
548
AVERAGE COST PEA UNIT PER MONTH
Manager's salary plus burden
Utilities
Office expense
MaIntenance expense
Miscellaneous expenses
Computer expense
Management f_
Advertising & promotion
Telephone
Yellow pages
Insurance
Property tax expense
Eviction costs
Tenant claims
General expenses
$2.48
$33.92
NORTH DAKOTA EXAMPLE
CASH CASH
PEA MONTH PEA YEAR
$896.00 $10.752.00
$3,080.00 $36,960.00
$3.762.00 $45,144.00
$4,872.00 $58,464.00
$4,312.00 $51,744.00
$1,664.00 $19,968.00
$18,586.00 $223,032.00
MONTHLY ANNUAL .
EXPENSES EXPENSES
$1 ,612.00 $19,344.00
$600.00 $7,200.00
$390.00 $4,680.00
$350.00 $4,200.00
$40.00 $480.00
$137.00 $1.644.00
$195.00 $2.340.00
$400.00 $4.800.00
$100.00 $1,200.00
$150.00 $1,800.00
$150.00 $1,800.00
$1 ,000.00 $12,000.00
$150.00 $1,800.00
$200.00 $2,400.00
$150.00 $1.800.00
$5.624.00 $67,488.00
$155,544.00
$139,98IUO
NETPAETAXINOOME $12,962.00
ADJUSTED FOR 10% VN;ANCY $11,685.80
INCOME APPROACH TO VALUE
.
INTEREST
MORTGAGE AMOUNT
% MORTGAGE OF VALlE
T AX/SO FT
INSISO FT
CASH EQUITY
APPRAISED VALUE
NET CAPITALIZATION RATE
PROJECT EQUITY
% EQUITY
10.00%
$1.185.097.14
80.00%
$0.80
$0.06
$0.00
$1,481,371.43
10.50%
$296.274.29
20.00%
Page 1
.
UNIT SOFT SOFT %OF MONTHlY PER MONTH N.Jt.eEA OF ANNUAl COST
SIZE PER UNIT ALLOCATED TOTAl COSTISQ FT PER UNIT UNITS PER sa FT
5x5 25 1800 5.03% $0.88 $22.00 72 $10.56
5X10 50 3600 10.07% $0.64 $32.00 72 $7.68
10xl0 100 3600 10.07% $0.50 $50.00 36 $6.00
10X15 150 5400 15.10% $0.40 $60.00 36 $4.80
10X20 200 1800 5.03% $0.35 $70.00 9 $4.20
10X25 250 9500 26.57% $0.33 $82.00 38 $3.94
12x30 360 5400 15.10% $0.32 $115.00 15 $3.83
20x25 500 1500 4.19% $0.31 $155.00 3 $3.72
24x30 720 2160 6.04% $0.30 $215.00 3 $3.58
40x25 1000 1000 2.80% $0.29 $290.00 1 $3.48
35760
285
$5.18
AVERAGE PER lJIIlT PER MONTH
$51.65
Manager's salary plus burden
Ulllllles
Offlce expense
Malntenance expense
Miscellaneous expenses
Computer expense
Manegement fees
Advertising & promotion
Telephone
Yellow peges
Insurance
Property lex expense
Eviction cOSIS
Tenant claims
General expenses
.
SHOAEWOOD MIIII STORAGE
CASH
PER MONTH
$1,564.00
$2,304.00
$1 ,800.00
$2,160.00
$630.00
$3,116.00
$1,725.00
$465.00
$645.00
$290.00
$14,719.00
MONTHlY
EXPE/'SES
$1,612.00
$350.00
$390.00
$350.00
$40.00
$137.00
$195.00
$200.00
$40.00
$75.00
$178.80
$1,788.00
$75.00
$100.00
$150.00
$5,680.80
tETN:OME $9,038.20
INCOME APPROACH TO VALUE
INTEREST
MORTGAGE AMOUNT
%MORTGAGEOFV~
T AX/SQ FT
INSISO FT
CASH EQUITY
APPRAISED VAlUE
NET CAPITAlIZATION RATE
PROJECT EQUITY
% EQUITY
CASH
PER YEAR
$19,008.00
$27,648.00
$21,600.00
$25,920.00
$7,560.00
$37,392.00
$20,700.00
$5,580.00
$7,740.00
$3,480.00
$176,628.00
ANNUAl
EXPENSES
$19,344.00
$4,200.00
$4,680.00
$4,200.00
$480.00
$1,644.00
$2,340.00
$2,400.00
$480.00
$900.00
$2,145.60
$21,456.00
$900.00
$1,200.00
$1,600.00
$68,169.60
$108,458.40
10.00%
$826,349.71
80.00%
$0.60
$0.06
$0.00
$1,032,937.14
10.50%
$206,587.43
20.00%
Page 1
.~. 'n,-'
.. !, 1 ':: ,.:-. . ..
," :'j:";~\' ......:.......c. ,....
,I \";: I ..' (- <i ; I :. (
" ~,,< ' ::jl;';,' :~, "
! . : ::V:>..
... ~; ~ ..,..
.
-
. I i
2 lea Q~
... c:.s o~ 2
I.) .. - ....
~ ~ E! :1
...I! lie f5i
Q . I: i 8 ~ cil
~a:a.8. ii ~a;t
1= Iii"
o. au~
o ea ...::i i
.~-
8
.~
.
o
~
~ ~ .
.
...
I
0
! 8
.
...
...
.
...
.
~ ::
~, I
.
~H ~
~~
..
II'
fX~
CD. ..
",'
... ...
~...
CD
..
.
N
...
-
j 1
j~ }i3
&i~ ar'
~~~ ~tZj
o ~ ~
~ .8 ~ ·
i ~ i ;.-
_: i':=
~~....~~
.3::~I~g
N :s
"
: '
1\:
.
...
<<8
-
...
;1
~~
.
CD ..
\0 0'
N ... -
-
1-
..
+
../
-
I
o
g I ...
~ ~ j
- .
+' ;
I :I ~
~ ] S
Pot 0 j
J ~
o 0
E-4 ~ c!
~
..
MHNITOU PRf.ERTIES, Inc.
33 10th Rue. S.
Suite 215
Hopkins, MN 55343
.
612 - 935 - 1258
January 16, 1987
City of Shorewood
5755 Country Club Rd.
Shorewood, MN 55331
Att: Brad Nielson
Dear Mr. Nielson,
In analyzing the feasibility of mini-warehouses, several elements should be examined. To begin with
let's review the costs involved in the construction and operation of a self storage facility. This is a
universal type of project. Because of this, we shall look at a hypothetical operation in North Dakota.
This data comes from an example prepared by the National Mini Storage Institute in Washington D.C..
Our composite model will be compared side by side with the projection's for our proposed operation, and
the operations statements of an actual local operation in St. Bonifacius. Construction costs of these 3
examples are basically the same.
Another element of concern then might be visibility and the average daily traffic count. The proposed
Shorewood location commands excellent visibility across from a major shopping center and the average
daily traffic count of 7800 ranks high among comparable projects reported on by the National Institute.
Also according to the National Mini Storage Institute, 90% of the population in a metro area are not
even aware of self storage, and 1 out of 30 households in that same urban area will require only 50 sq
ft.. Some of the older projects that were hidden and unsecure caused much of this problem. We plan to
develop a secure visible project.
With the increase of apartment buildings and condominiums in the lake area, we have found through our
conversations with project managers of these facilities that there is a real need for storage of
household and personal property. Business owners around the lake have also indicated that there is not
enough storage space of this type available on a month to month or long term basis. For example the
Tonka Bay boat works, Shorewood Marina, and Excelsior Motor Mart have indicated a need for storage
of small boats and the related equipment.
Other storage needs will now include the lawn and garden equipment, snowmobiles, etc. that was once
allowed as outside storage for residents of Mound and Tonka Bay.
Lake Minnetonka boaters who are not residents of the immediate community will also store their boats
and equipment to make a Saturday outing easier.
The enclosed map indicates the locations of other self storage facilities in the metro area. It appears
that there are only 3 other facilities near the proposed project and the Spring Park site is adding on to
support more business. All three report better than 90% occupancy year round.
I'm sure that after you see how the proposed Shorewood project agrees with the operations data of
these other facilities, you will be convinced of how our Self Storage facility will serve the best
interests of the community of Shorewood.
Sincerely,
"
JILl, ,) I
U ~~1t i~,j/1.u:',,:,~
John T. Bessesen, Pres.
UNIT
SIZE
5x5
5X10
1 Ox1 0
10X15
10X20
10x30
so FT SO FT % OF MON11-Il Y PEA MONTH Nl.UlER OF ANNUAL COST
PERUNrrALL.OCATED TOTAL COST/SOFT PERUNrr UNrrS PERSOFT
25 1600 2.55% $0.56 $14.00 64 $6.72
50 7000 11 .1 5% $0.44 $22.00 140 $5.28
100 11400 18.15% $0.33 $33.00 114 $3.96
150 17400 27.71% $0.28 $42.00 118 $3.38
200 17600 28.03% $0.25 $49.00 88 $2.94
300 7800 12.42% $0.21 $64.00 26 $2.56
62800
548
$2.48
AVERN3E COST PEA UNIT PEA MONTH
$33.92
Manager's salll1Y plus burden
Utilities
Ofllce expense
MaIntenance expense
Miscellaneous expenses
Computer expense
Management fees
Advertising & promotion
Telephone
Yellow peges
Insurance
Property laX expense
Eviction costs
Tenant claims
General expenses
NORTH DAKOTA EXAMPLE
CASH CASH
PEA MONTH PEA YEAR
$896.00 $10,752.00
$3,080.00 $36,960.00
$3,762.00 $45,144.00
$4,872.00 $58,464.00
$4,312.00 $51,744.00
$1,664.00 $19,968.00
$18,586.00 $223,032.00
MONlHL Y ANNUAL .
EXPENSES EXPENSES
$1 ,612.00 $19,344.00
$600.00 $7,200.00
$390.00 $4,680.00
$350.00 $4,200.00
$40.00 $480.00
$137.00 $1,644.00
$195.00 $2,340.00
$400.00 $4,800.00
$100.00 $1,200.00
$150.00 $1,800.00
$150.00 $1,800.00
$1 ,000.00 $12,000.00
$150.00 $1,800.00
$200.00 $2,400.00
$150.00 $1,800.00
$5,624.00 $87,488.00
$155,544.00
$139,989.80
NET PRETAX INCOME $12,962.00
ADJUSTED FOR 10% VACANCY $11,665.80
INCOME APPROACH TO VALUE
.
INTEREST
MORTGAGE AMOUNT
% MORTGAGE OF VALli:
T AXJSQ FT
INS/SO FT
CASH eaurrY
APPRAISED VALUE
NET CAPITALIZATION RATE
PROJECT eaurrY
% EaulTY
10.00%
$1,185,097.14
80.00%
$0.60
$0.06
$0.00
$1,481,371.43
10.50%
$296,274.29
20.00%
Page 1
.
UNIT
SIZE
5x5
5X10
10x10
10X15
10X20
10X25
12x30
20x25
24x30
40x25
so FT SO FT % OF MONTHLY PER MONTH N.M3EROF ANNUAL COST
PERUNITAU.OCATEO TOTAL COSTISQFT PERUNIT UNITS PERSOFT
25 1800 5.03% $0.88 $22.00 72 $10.56
50 3600 10.07% $0.64 $32.00 72 $7.68
100 3600 10.07% $0.50 $50.00 38 $6.00
150 5400 15.10% $0.40 $60.00 38 $4.80
200 1800 5.03% $0.35 $70.00 9 $4.20
250 9500 26.57% $0.33 $82.00 38 $3.94
360 5400 1 5.1 0% $0.32 $115.00 15 $3.83
500 1500 4.19% $0.31 $155.00 3 $3.72
720 2160 6.04% $0.30 $215.00 3 $3.58
1000 1000 2.80% $0.29 $290.00 1 $3.48
35760
285
$5.18
AVERAGE PER UNIT PER MONTH
$51.65
Manager's salary plus burden
Utilities
Office expense
Maintenance expense
Miscellaneous expenses
Computer expense
Management fees
Adver1lslng & promotion
Telephone
Yellow pages
Insurance
Property tax expense
Eviction costs
Tenant claims
General expenses
SHOAEWOOO MNI STORAGE
.
CASH
PER MONTH
$1 ,584.00
$2,304.00
$1,800.00
$2,160.00
$630.00
$3,116.00
$1,725.00
$465.00
$645.00
$290.00
$14,719.00
MONTHLY
EXPENSES
$1,612.00
$350.00
$390.00
$350.00
$40.00
$137.00
$195.00
$200.00
$40.00
$75.00
$1 78.80
$1 ,788.00
$75.00
$100.00
$150.00
$5,680.80
NETN:OME $9,038.20
t4COME APPROACH TO VALUE
INTEREST
MORTGAGE AMOUNT
% MORTGAGE OF VALUE
T AXISQ FT
INSISO FT
CASH EQUITY
APPRAISED VALUE
NET CAPITALIZATION RATE
PROJECT EQUITY
% EQUITY
CASH
PER YEAR
$19,008.00
$27,648.00
$21,600.00
$25.920.00
$7,560.00
$37,392.00
$20,700.00
$5,580.00
$7,740.00
$3,480.00
$176,628.00
ANNUAL
EXPENSES
$19,344.00
$4,200.00
$4,680.00
$4,200.00
$480.00
$1,644.00
$2,340.00
$2,400.00
$480.00
$900.00
$2,145.60
$21,456.00
$900.00
$1,200.00
$1,800.00
$68,169.60
$108,458.40
10.00%
$828,349.71
80.00%
$0.60
$0.08
$0.00
$1,032,937.14
10.50%
$208,587.43
20.00%
Page'
"ARNDT .
· CoN8TRUCT'ON
Co."ANY
construction management
gene,a'conkactlng
4225 NORTHERN ROAD
EXCELSIOR, MINNESOTA 55331
("21 474-7tH8
".
. .'\"
.... "...::,.....:
. '. . ... .......".\Illo. ..,..j
.. .:::" f'L: ~~~
. ......
. : .~,. . ',<'.: ..
. . '::~::,.f:':~!:~'\.~
.' '.. '" '.,
.' . . ....~.. '.'
. '. .... .~
~',.I' ..... ,~ .....
... ,. . . ....
_..' 1,
8/6/85
MINI-8TORAOB PRo-POBMA
I ".' b..'1
. ."'.,......
. ..., """'~':
. "":,'
", -
,', .
5,000 .quare teet 0 1_.00 ooat. ,\ '70,000.00 ":
debt .ervioe - )OJr. amort.
11.5~ intere.t rate, 69'.21 x 12. . 8,'18.52
~ vacanC7 taotor -15.9'
..
201 debt .ervioe taotor 1, 7~.89 -:..~'
utili tie., 1neuranoe,maiDtainoe 3.600.00'
total a.nnual oo.t. . .
'1",081.~
Total incClM (1 ~ OOOUPADOr)
ProJeoted Net Inoome
Return on IDve.-t:m.n't
'21.250.00 "
+ . 7,168.76
10.~
"
'1!JlIlO.
0
0
0
CD
I
CD
"
V
I
C\J
..-
CD
W
Z a> . I: "1:1
0 0&; "1:1 ltI
U I ....8 ltI- j L..
0. 0.... j
11. L.. ~ I: . a> 0
2 w o a> -a> -
..J
W ....L.. .... Ul.... ....
I- 0 j - ....j ~
- Ul.c. o Ul I: 0
1:(1) >- a> ....
. 0 0"E e a> I:
-I: a>.c. 0
- ....- ....a> >.... 0
... ltI L.. 0
..- -0\ "1:1 L.. L.."1:I a>
en m j .... a> j 0.1: Ul
. ('I) 0 "1:1 0 e ltI ltI
to -"CI a>
- to ltI ltI >a> ,...
00 00&; "1:1 a> . 0.
::J z 0::: L...... a> 0) (I)
~ 0) 0. UlltlL&. ..
1:>- I: OL..(.) ....
a ~ -.... I: 0 0.0 0
"1:11: 0 0....- a>
I: j - "1:1 L.. Ul . -,
C) <t &.8 ....a> 0. 'O;t 0
N ~ :a L&. L..
IX ~ a>(.).... 0.
~ "1:1 0 L...o 0&; 0
I:N 0 ....ga> Ul
W ltI\O ....a>
lC\ I: L.. eoo+- 0&;
. .... -ltI o .. ltI ....
ID ....+- L...... L..
o ltI 0"1:1 .... .... 0) I:
~ , ....1: ...... .... I: e
I: a> ltI 0) ....
~ j+- Ul I: "1:1 0 "1:1 ) a>
W L.. - 1:\0 1:' L.. >-
0 >- Ul 000 ....01: ltI 10
<t .... L.. -0\ -o.j 0) ::E:
IX 0 a> a> ........ j L.. a> ,
a: +-0&; UlL.. L.. I:
.... ltI.... "1:1 .. a> a> 0) a>
:I: m tI'\ 0 :. "1:1 0 L.. +- I: Ul
i I ~ ltI 0 ltI.... ltI- I: a>
... I- UlL&. e+- .... ~.... 0 0&;
::J "1:I1t'\ a> L.. a> L.. .... Ul . ~ 0
0 ltI -a> o Ul L..a> 0 1::- .... ~ (I)
c:t o ltI ....0) ........ 10.0 , L.. X Ul L
en 0:::.... L..IO Ul I: e I:oa> a>
CD 0 a>L.. ~ Ul a> j.... j L.
a en 0 \0 "1:I.oUl 0.0 a> I:+- L. Ul a> r:T .. 0
..- 00 1:8ja> 0.... .c. a> 00. 0&; ......
:z 0\ a> -I: L.(I) .... > -a> I:IO+- >- (I) a> ..
- Ul . (.) I: a.. 0 ....(1) I: ,:,&. I:
<( -a> - "1:1 "1:1 L.. ltI >-0 ltI ;:) 10 0
..., .. a> L. >- ::E: ja> I: 0. - "1:1 a>.o.... 0- ....
0 -OL.. OUl e j a> Ul a> ~ J en L..
; tI'\ z.c..... .. ....0 .... - o+- ltI"1:I"CI > .. ~
(1)1:"1:1 - 0. "1:1 -ltI a> a> a> ltI >- LLI .
"S L. "1:1 j8 1:0 ltI -0 "1:1 ltI"1:I L..-- .c. - al <
~o a> 10 .... 8 IOL.. L.. a> a> (.) 0"1:1- . a> L1 e
~ .0 L..O . :La.. ce O&;Ul L. 1:1:0 j a> L.. Ul
~ e ce a> o 0 a> a> -ltIL.. o 0 a> 0::: a> , ....
4t' a> >-It'\ L.. L.. ltIo. Ul.... 0&;.... >-- 0 :J: . ..
~ ~ . .... It'\ 0 .. ltI ....0 a>+- a> I: .... I: !< I: 0 .. ce
III L.. - ,... .c. LLI a> ....L.. 0&; a> 0&; a> 0 .... .... 10 I: 0 <
C :L(JIt'\(I) 0::: C <0. ......- .......00 -0 (I) (I) c a> 0 c
Ul
~
0)
0)
..
'e
4/ iI
,.,,"" ~
"
i
f"
~. .'
t;.
~, .
*
f
i'
.
"
E
,
Ji
L,
O 0Zi;ii....
'~3'~. ..... ..:_......,........._ -.~:~....._._d~~~.
.... .. Jlt(!,;,:~~..' .i,. ."
.
~.,_,;f~ .; .. ..- '..__
.'~~'''. ., ...... . ~iI!I&.:::~..u_
. -=--:
..". -. .
..
~ . >.oM_
;...; ....~~',..
.'
III
!l
11
.
(/~~~
."""
"::
" .
"'"
..
-:-
./ ..-~ f-~ .. ~ ~~~
fL~. ~<JM41I-~=~-'~~, .~~.-u...;. _~
'i ~ ~-w~~!~-~~--~~7~----~~ ---
- ~--ff -~ rf:$~ .___~_ '__ (. __~
,. ..... .'.. ~.~~.~~~.~~. .../A~- .'~
-- -- ..... . ------'!.~----7~- ~-~ .. .. '~~t "".
......vI... .. .-~_..~ ~_
.;1 -~ ~ .. ~c ----~.J+- C:-'--'f
~--=---- '.. --~---~-~- ------
~k---- ~~-'~---_~
--- if--- 1~___,-- __
--- :'~-:_L~--~d~u-'1t1~~~~jjil!===~~_
-~ . ----"'.- ---~-----~--J1 ~ "~.__~ ~~ ..~. .______ _~__,_._..
f- - ... .. ---~ ,d~____~=_--_-
I
f
f .
,~..,--~~_.,"---,-~-~ -,-:..-~- -"'
~---,-..---_--~-
f
........-,.----,~..... -,-,
~ /-
.
.
Rfrr . 2 0 1981
LAw OFFICES
WILLIAM F. KELLY AND ASSOCIATES
WILLIAM F. KELLY
MARK W. KELLY
351 SECOND STREET
EXCELSIOR, MINNESOTA 55331
(612) 474-5977
January 16, 1987
Mr. Robert Rascop
Mayor, City of Shorewood
5755 Country Club Road
Shorewood, MN 55331
Dear Mayor Rascop:
I read the account of the recent Shorewood council meeting in the
January 15, 1987 edition of the'South Shore Weekly News. As a
resident in the ~eneral area, I too was concerned about
construction of mobile homes" (sectional) on Riviera Lane.
When the state legislature passed legislation opening the way for
location of these structures throughout a city residential area,
I recommended adoption by cities I represented certain changes
which gave the city council an opportunity to rule on this
question.
I suggested these procedures to the city administrator, but I
felt I should also pass it on directly to you since you expressed
your personal concern over the inability of the council to react
to these requests.
What we did was ammend the section of the zoning ordinance
dealing with minimum building requirements so as to more fully
deal with health and safety in protecting occupants against
potential injury from storm, wind, etc. Section 200.03 Subd.
2(b) of Shorewood's ordinance could be amended by the addition of
something similar to the following:
(6) Principal structures in all residential districts
shall be (a) of a minimum width of twenty-five
(25) feet, (b) have a minimum floor space of
eight hundred (800) square feet, (c) be sup-
ported by foundation walls with frost footings of
42" in depth.
.
g
.
.
.
WlWAM F. KELLY AND ASSOCIATES, AlTORNEYS
January 16, 1987
Mayor Robert Rascop
Page 2
Such regulations could be worked into the ordinance most
anywhere. I make this suggestion only because I am interested in
the future of the Yellowstone Trail neighborhood and hope these
thoughts can be of some use.
William F. Kelly
./
./
....
.
.
CITY OF
SHOREWOOD
MAYOR
Robert Rascop
COUNCI L
Jan Haugen
Tad Shaw
Kristi Stover
Robert Gagne
ADMIN ISTRA TOR
Daniel J. Vogt
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD . SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 . (612) 474-3236
MEMO TO: Mayor and Councilmembers
FROM: Dan Vogt ~
DATE: January 22, 1987
SUBJECT: Shorewood Oaks
Dave Johnson, owner of the Shorewood Oaks property, has met with staff to
discuss re-starting the Shorewood Oaks Project. Staff has reviewed with
Mr. Johnson all of the steps that need to be taken in order to continue
with the development of the property. One of the items that is currently
under way is the process of going through the entire platting procedure
again. This is necessary since the plat was not filed within the speci-
fied amount of time when approval was previously given. The public hearing
on the preliminary plat is scheduled for February 3. Since the plat is not
changed from the one previously approved, this process could be thought of
as a mere formality. However, it does give those persons who live near the
property another opportunity to comment.
The reason that this item appears on your January 26 meeting agenda is due
to a petition by Mr. Johnson to have the City construc4 bond for and assess
against the property the cost of improvements to the property. Mr. Johnson
will submit the petition at the meeting. At this time, it appears that
all of the remaining improvements will be requested to be assessed. If the
City Council approves the petition by Resolution, another Resolution would
be passed authorizing the preparation of a feasiblity report to be done by
the City Engineer. The City Council should require that the developer sub-
mit a cash deposit or letter of credit for all costs incurred by the City
in order to prepare the feasibility report. Finally, the Council should
appoint the Bond Counsel and Bond Consultant who will aid in the prepara-
tion of the feasibility report.
Please contact me prior to the meeting on Monday night if you have any
questions.
DJV/slt
cc: Brad Nielsen
Jim Norton
Glenn Froberg
Dave Johnson
Ray Brandt
A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore
9
Ii
;~"C:'L' F'i1ance /\dViSorS
85 East Seventh Place, SUite tOO
Sainr Paul, Minnesota 55101.2143
612.223.3000
January 22, 1987
Mr. Daniel J. Vogt, Administrator
City Hall
5755 Country Club Road
Shorewood, Minnesota 55331
RE: Advance Refunding $1,250,000 General Obligation Improvement Bonds,
Series I 984A
Dear Mr. Vogt:
In early December we reviewed this outstanding issue of the City and found it
to be eligible for an advance refunding. Subsequent to our earlier discussions,
we now have updated information and request your consideration of our
proposal to advance refund the bonds.
The prir.cipal amount outstanding, after payment of current debt service on
February I, I 987, is $1, t 1 0, 000. The bonds have a fi nal paymen tin 200 I and
are callable on February I, 1994. The bonds were sold at a net interest rate of
9.5505% and the outstanding bonds have a composite rate of 9.49%.
Based on current market conditions, which are the most favorable since 1979,
we estimate we could refinance this issue at a net effective rate of 6.11 %.
After making the February I debt service payment, we understand the City
will have funds on hand in the debt service account for this issue of $520,286.
This represents prepayments of special assessments. Again, based on market
conditions, these funds can be invested at rates only around the 6% level
thereby creating a negative arbitrage situation. That is, you cannot invest
your funds at the same or better rate you are paying on the bonds.
Throu~h the incorporation of the use of funds on hand, we propose the City
issue ~875,000 of general obligation improvement refunding bonds to advance
refund the 1984 issue. This financing technique will save an estimated
$246,950 of net debt service costs throughout the life of the program. The net
savings represents 30.26% of current interest.
Should the City Council decide to proceed with this program, we will prepare
formal recommendations for consideration at the Council meeting on
February 9.
Sincerely,. -7 a,/ '- '
~~.--.-~
Gerard B. Shannon
Vice President
/mgh
Enclosures
,
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
TUESDAY, JANUARY 20, 1987
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
5755 COUNTRY'~LUB ROAD
7:30 P.M.
M I NUT E S
CALL TO ORDER
draft
Acting-Chair Benson called the meeting to order at 7:39 P.M.
ROLL CALL
Present: Acting-Chair Benson; Commissioners Mason, Schultz, and Spellman;
Council Liaison Stover; Planner Nielsen; Planning Assist. Helgesen.
Absent: Commissioners Leslie (vacation), and Watten (ill).
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Commission members did not receive the minutes of the previous meeting in their
packets, therefore approval of same is deferred to the next meeting.
PUBLIC HEARING - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND VARIANCES - CONTINUATION FROM
6 JANUARY 1987
William Henney - 26990 Edgewood Road
Public portion of the public hearing re-opened at 7:40 P.M.
Planner Nielsen reported that since the meeting of January 6th the Shoreland Impact
Plan has been received, the DNR has submitted written comments stating no specific
objection, and the Commission has had time to review the Attorney's report.
In reference to the Shoreland Impact Plan, Planner Nielsen further recommended that
a silt fence or hay bales be installed to prevent erosion into the lake.
As a result of further investigation, the City Attorney reports that this lot has
been used for dockage over the years, and the dock which currently exists and its
use has been grandfathered-in.
Mark J. Ayotte, attorney representing neighbor David Garber, said it appears that
the applicant would be creating his own hardship. Mr. Ayotte then read and submitted
a letter from James R. Koss who objects to the request because of lot width and
would like to the the zoning regulations upheld.
Also submitted was .a petition of opposition signed by 18 residents along Edgewood Rd.
Gene Of stead (son of co-owner) said he feels a hardship does exist for the owners.
The lot was purchased as buildable, the sewer was assessed against a buildable lot,
and the Commission has granted;variances for smaller lots.
Bill Henney (applicant) reminded the Commission that a building permit would have
been issued just two years ago, and the owners have done nothing to change the lot.
Mike Fonte, 26915 Edgewood Rd, said he would prefer that a home not be built on the
lot, but he believes the owners should be reimbursed the full value of the lot if
they are unable to develop it.
Minutes
Planning Commission Meeting
January 20, 1987
Benson acknowledged a letter from Dana and Charlotte Marcelius, 27015 Edgewood Rd
in which they rescind their earlier objection. Also acknowledged was a letter
submitted by Helen Langer, 27150 Edgewood Rd stating no objection.
Public portion of the public hearing closed at 8:00 P.M.
Mason asked if the neighbors have talked about ~purchasing the lot. Mr. Ayotte
said that in April of 1984 an offer was made to David Garber and Herb Mason to sell
the lot, but negotiati~ were never carried out.
Spellman moved, seconded by Benson to recommend to Council denial of the conditional
use permit and variances as requested.
Schultz said he doesn't feel the Commission can ignore that the City is obligated
to allow the owners to have advantage of the value of the lot as they originally
bought it.
Benson cited the Jabs request where the applicant was forced to combine his prevously
assessed lots in order to build on one.
Stover read a statement by Attorney Froberg which said that if the request is denied
because the proposal is incompatible with the surrounding community, then the
sewer assessment should be refunded with interest, the dock use should be allowed
as grandfathered-in, and the lot could be sold with the dock use.
Motion to deny was split by Roll Call Vote - 2 ayes (Benson, Spellman) - 2 nays
(Mason, Schultz).
At the request of the applicant this item will appear on the Council Agenda for
the meeting on February 9, 1987.
7:45 PM PUBLIC HEARING - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A SELF-STORAGE FACILITY
Manitou Properties, Inc. - 5620 Manitou Road
Public portion of the public hearing opened at 8:16 P.M.
John Smith~ Smith Architects, gave a brief recap of the proposal to build a self-
storage facil-ity at 5620 Manitou Road. His illustration showed an approximate acre
of land at the front (east) of the site reserved for future commercial development
(type unknown at this time).
Mr. Smith showed how the drainage would be served by pipes collecting and channeling
run-off water to a retaining pond at the west end of the building. He said the
grading of the driveway has been revised at the Planner's request.
One resident asked about the height of the walls around the facility. Mr. Smith
said the walls would be 5 to 8 feet from the ground at the north end, and 8 to 12
feet at the south end because of the grade. She also asked if there will be a roof,
and Mr. Smith told her yes, an attached roof will be installed.
- 2 -
Minutes
Planning Commission Meeting
January 20, 1987
Manitou Properties, C.U.P., continued:
A property owner to the northwest asked about lighting and what his view of the
building would by like. Mr. Smith replied that the lighting is a v~ry low voltage,
and with the trees which will remain, he possibly won't even be abl~ to see the walls
of the building. The neighbor said he is concerned about his trees dying from the
drainage run-off.
Jim Beal, representing Clair and Jan Towne of 24740 Smithtown Rd, questioned if
there would be any barrier around the ponding area for safety purposes. Mr. Smith
said that none is planned. A letter of objection from the Townes was also submitted
to the Commission.
Public portion of the public hearing closed at 8:55 P.M.
Spellman moved, seconded by Benson to recommend to Council approval of the conditional
use permit subject to all recommendations in the Planner's report including the
recommendation that no further access (to the south) be allowed onto County Rd. 19.
Schultz asked for clarification of signage. Mr. Smith said the size and design of
the signage has not yet been determined. Planner Nielsen said the Ordinance places
restrictions on signage.
Planner Nielsen clarified that, as noted in his report, the facility is to be used
for storage purposes only. Mr. Smith said it is stated in the renter's contract
that no other use (cleaning equipment, repairs, etc.) will be allowed on the site.
Motion carried unanimously by Roll Call Vote.
8:00 PM PUBLIC HEARING - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR EXPANSION OF ADMINISTRATIVE
OFFICE AT CITY HALL
Shorewood City Council - 5795 Country Club Road
Public portion of the public hearing opened at 9:13 P.M.
Planner Nielsen pointed out the issues currently not meeting Shorewood's own zoning
require~s such as outdoor storage, inadequate parking setbacks, etc. Also presented
were slides showing examples of the noriconformities to current zoning, and then
areas of proposed improvement.
Andrew Marshall (attorney representing neighbors Peter Royse ,William Wrede ,and
Joann Carroll) said that the City would be in violation ofSubd. 1(d)(1)(c)of
Section 200.04 of the Shorewood Zoning Ordinance by converting the house at
5795 Country Club Road to offices. Specifically, it would adversely affect the
property values of the neighboring residential properties. Mr. Marshall has
submitted an appraiser's evaluation stating such depreciation.
Peter Royse, 5825 Country Club Road, asked if the City ever explored the different
costs of alternative options for expansion of the City offices, such as remodeling
the basement. Stover referred to the staff report by Administrator Vogt which covered
the various estimates, and staying at ground level was least expensive.
Jim Haute, Echo Rd, questioned the costs of the various options.
- 3 -
Minutes
Planning Commission Meeting
January 20, 1987
City Hall Expansion, continued:
Joann Carroll, 5815 Echo Rd., asked the City to consider moving the Council Chambers
to the basement and remodel the current Chambers. Or expand to the north and move
the metal public works buildings off the site in order to accommodate required
parking.
Jack Brancel, 25785 Sunnyvale Lane, said he thinks it would be a real waste of space
not to use the basement.
Public portion of the public hearing closed at 10:01 P.M.
Spellman moved, seconded by Mason to re-open and continue the public portion of
the public hearing to the next Planning Commission meeting of February 3, 1987.
Motion carried unanimously.
SUNGOLD HOMES - HOUSE MOVING PERMIT
Jim Funk - 6115 Riviera Lane
The applicant, Jim Funk, was not present.
Sungold Homes, Inc. would like to move a manufactured home onto an acre+ lot located
at 6115 Riviera Lane. The house will exceed the setback requirements for the R-1A
district. A detached two-car garage will also be located,forward of the house,
approximately 168 feet from the street.
The surrounding neighOOrsare very concerned about the affect a manufactured home
will have on their property values. They have been seeking ways to bar the home
from coming into their neighborhood, and have learned that they must go to the
legislature to change the laws which allow manufactured homes to be treated the
same as custom built single-family dwellings.
Planner Nielsen brought to the attention of the Commission the possibility of
amending the Zoning Ordinance so that it provides for regulation of roof pitch. This
would make moving of manufactured homes more difficult. Commission discussed the
enforceability of placing restrictions on design (prohibiting flat roofs).
Schultz moved, seconded by Spellman to recommend to Council approval of the house
moving permit. Motion carried unanimously.
Benson moved, seconded by Spellman to initiate action of a minimum slope requirement
(of roofs) in the Zoning Ordinance, and for Planner Nielsen to investigate other
communities' action regarding mobile homes with a legal opinion of same. Motion
carried unanimously.
A public hearing for an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance regarding roof pitch will
be scheduled for the February 17th Study Session. .
- 4 -