Loading...
062287 CC Reg AgP , ~ , . ..,a' . ,,' ",~ " CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MONDAY, JUNE 22, 1987 COUNCIL CHAMBERS 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD 7:30 P.M. AGENDA CALL TO ORDER A. B. Pledge of Allegiance Roll Call Stover Gagne Braneel Mayor Raseop Haugen 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. Board of Review - May 28, 1987 B. (Att. lA - Minutes) Regular Council Meeting r: & I q n (~tt. lB)- Minutes) 2. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR A. B. 3. PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT A. B. 4. PARK COMMISSION REPORT A. B. -1- V; V/ /' V V/ V ,jJ 1, ",.. ,. , -J ..~ REGULAR COUNCIL AGENDA MONDAY, JUNE 22, 1987 page two S. CONSENT AGENDA A. Payment Voucher '1 - Project 87-1 Shorewood Oaks - R. Knutson Inc. B. Street Light Requests -(Att. Sa - Payment Voucher) 1. Shady Hills Road and Highway 7 Frontage Road 2. Glen Road and Unitarian Church Parking Lot (Att. .SBl - Request) moved seconded Vote ~ ~\~ '-' ~~ (Requested by Jo Herman representing the church) 6. SETBACK VARIANCE/VARIANCE TO INCREASE NONCONFORMITY OF A NONCONFORMING STRUCTURE Applicant: Location: Eric Danser 21640 Lilac Lane (Att. 6 - Staff Report) 7. RECONSIDERATION - REZONING AND PRELIMINARY PLAT - BRENTRIDGE Applicant: Location: Dave Johnson Howards Point Road and Smithtown Road - N.E. Corner (Att. 7 - Staff Report) 8. TOWNE ADDITION - FINAL PLAT APPROVAL Applicant: Location: William Ecoff 24740 Smithtown Road (Att. 8 - Staff Report) -2- ", ~ .. -1 << '" REGULAR COUNCIL AGENDA MONDAY, JuNE 22, 1987 page three 9. DISPOSITION OF CITY OWNED HOUSE - 5795 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD - AND OFFICE SPACE NEEDS ANALYSIS 10. C. U. P. FOR DEVELOPMENT OF A SUBSTANDARD LAKE SHORE LOT- VARIANCE FOR AN ACCESSORY STRUCTURE WITHOUT PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE - SETBACK VARIANCE Applicant: Location: Neil Sparirldi1l9 5460 Howards Point Road *Refer to Council Packet of June 8, 1987 11. TETON LANE AND LILAC LANE DISCUSSION Residents present to request Council Support (Att. 11 - Resident Letter) 12. PLANNER'S REPORT A. Simple Subdivision Reapproval Applicant: Location: Cycil Kerber 4800 R.ustic Way B. 13. ATTORNEY'S REPORT A. Findings of Fact - Houser Property >(Att. l3Al- Resolution approving Shore land Grading & Filling Variance) (Att. 13A2- Resolution Denying Slope Variance) B. Resolution Establishing Water Connection (Att. 13B - Resolution) C. -3- '\ .I ...~ ., . . REGULAR COUNCIL AGENDA MONDAY, JUNE 22, 1987 page four 14. ENGINEER'S REPORT A. Glen-Road/Badger Watermain Extension - watermain Report B. Street Improvement Project Cost Estimate: Beverly/Cajed West 62nd Street C. Southeast Area Water Connections - Status Report D. 15. ADMINISTRATION REPORTS A. Street Light Request - Waterford, 2nd Addition B. Request for Speed Zone Study - Wedgewood Road (Att. l5B - Letter of Request) C. Church Road Project Improvement - Chanhassen Portion Status Report (Att. l5C - Correspondence) ,D. 1988 Budget Discussion (Att. l5D - Memo) E. Union Negotiation - Set Strategy Session F. Discussion of Auto-Dialer - Woodhaven Well G. 16. MAYOR'S REPORT A. B. 17. COUNCIL REPORTS A. B. 18. APPROVAL OF CLAIMS AND ADJOURNMENT -4- ~ CITY OF SHOREWOOD PARK COMMISSION MEETING MONDAY, JUNE 15, 1987 COUNCIL CHAMBERS 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD 7:00 PM MINUTES ~ CALL TO ORDER Chairman Jakel called the meeting to order at 7:05 PM. ROLL CALL Present: Chairman Jakel, Commissioners Lindstrom, Andrus, Christensen, and Laberee; Council Liaison Brancel and park Assistant Niccum Absent: Commissioners Vogel and Nicol (both informed me ahead of time) APPROVAL OF MINUTES Christensen moved, Andrus seconded, to approve the minutes of June 1, 1987, as written. Motion carried unanimously. CATHCART PARK - ROAD PROPOSAL Mr. Gary D. Carlson approached the Commission to see if they are interested in putting in a road on the south side of Cathcart Park. He said he could not guarantee what people would put in their backyards facing the park-sheds, fences, etc., and asked which the Commission would prefer, having backyards facing their park, or a road as a buffer? The City would be expected to share the road cost. The opinion of the Commission was that there are already roads on three sides of the park, a forth road is not necessary. Mr. Carlson then said he would be willing to sell his 9+ acres of property for the assessed valuation of $170,000 to the City for additional parkland. The Commission thanked him for his input. They declined his offer and suggested he continue dealing with the City of Chanhassen as long as the property is in their City. CATHCART PARK - POWER POLES When Gary Carlson was present, he also suggested that the City contact the power company and have them pick up the power poles stored behind the Cathcart tennis courts. He felt the creosote was dangerous. He thought the power company would pick them up and replace them with newer poles that do not contain creosote if requested to do so. The Commission asked staff to check with Public Works Director Zdrazil to get his opinion. MANOR PARK WARMING HOUSE/PAVILION Commissioner Lindstrom talked to Ted Lepowsky about the plans. but he hasn't had them signed by an architect or engineer yet. have it done before the next meeting. They are done He will try to -1- PARK COMMISSION MINUTES MONDAY, JUNE 15, 1987 page two FREEMAN PARK SIGNS MnDOT Signs The Commission was pleased with Administrator Vogt's suggestion to have MnDOT put brown signs with white lettering reading "FREEMAN PARK" and an arrow facing traffic in both directions on the r.o.w. They are in full agreement and thank him for his suggestion. Signs on Little League Field Park Assistant Niccum is in the process of getting bids. One has been received from Moore Sign Company to repaint the scoreboard and put 3 sheets of duraply over the existing "Welcome to South Tonka Little League". They would paint "Welcome to Freeman Park - City of Shorewood" on the duraply in their shop, then install it at the field. Their cost would be $1200. FREEMAN PARK FILL The Commission discussed the placement of the fill in Freeman Park. Commissioner Laberee asked to see the grading plan done by OSM. He went over it with the Commission, showing them where fill would be added and where it would be removed. Chairman Jakel mentioned that he had been out there. He said there appears to be some debris but that they did a nice job of leveling it. Council Liaison Brancel said she had been told by the Administrator and Engineer that the debris would be buried when the final grading is done. FREEMAN PARK MASTER PLAN During the grading discussion an idea that had cropped up before, that of moving the southernmost ballfield and relocating the parking lot, was reviewed. The Commission then reviewed the master plan. The possibility of having all the ball- fields in one area was discussed. It was felt that this could save on fencing and expenses by using on fence for two fields, plus locating all "like" activities in one area. The possibility of a mud problem caused by the central location of the rinks in a heavy traffic area was brought up by Commissioner Laberee. The Commission asked staff to send them copies of the master plan so they could cut out the various athletic facilities and parking lot and try to come up with alternative suggestions in time for the next meeting (7/6/87). CATHCART PARK - PARKING/TRASH PROBLEM Staff reported the following steps have been taken: 1. Letter to Little League requesting them to ask their coaches to discuss the trash and parking with the kids and their parents. 2. Phone call to Mr. Roberts of the Soccer League requesting them to ask their coaches to discuss the trash and parking with the kids and their parents. 3. Request to Don to empty barrel (done). 4. Return call to resident explaining what's been done. MANOR PARK LANDSCAPE PLAN Put off until next meeting. -2- PARK COMMISSION MINUTES MONDAY, J~ 15, 1987 page three MANOR PARK - PLAYGROUND/VOLLEYBALL COURT Park Assistant Niccum reviewed the comments received so far from various contractors. C. G. Braun and LanDeCon will be submitting estimates. She will continue to work on this. Commmissioner Laberee said he thought, considering the soil type at Manor Park, that drainage tile running toward the pond should be put in or there could be a water retention problem in the sand. MANOR PARK - BALLFIELD Due to extreme heat and lack of rain, only about 10% of the seed planted is growing. A lot if it has died. The Commission suggests it be cut starting now. They also suggest that in August possible the crew can loosen up the soil and plant more seed. They will discuss this in more detail at a later meeting. CATHCART PARK - PARKING LOT The Commission discussed the proposed parking lot location in Cathcart Park. They are considering the idea of moving the ballpark and putting a parking lot in the northeastern area of the park with the entrance on West 62nd Street. They also discussed eventually putting in a warming house similar to the one going up in Manor, with the warming house convenient to the rinks and the pavilion conven- ient to serve as shelter for sports spectators. MATrERS FROM THE FLOOR Cathcart Park - Basketball Court Council agreed to have the work done on the Cathcart basketball court for $1,270. The court will have a 2" mat. Freeman Park - Eureka Entrance Administrator Vogt is sending a letter to Engineer Norton regarding surveying to determine the setback for the gate and road. Harvey Strom of "Country Signs" had dropped off three sample post tops for the Commission's consideration. They looked them over and chose the cut at the right. Freeman Park - Trees The Commission asked if the trees had been removed. Niccum replied no, that all the fill is done and none was dumped in that area. Because of this it is not the high priority item it was, Staff would prefer to wait because they want to see II some of the trees can be transplanted, also if any trees should remain in the park if they do not interfere with the athletic areas. They can be cut and fill dumped on top at the time of final grading. Commissioner Laberee said the trees are Ash and cutting them off and covering them may not be thebe~t thing to do because they are tough and could send up shoots and regrow.. He said taking roots and all out with a backhoe would be a better way to do it. -3- PARK COMMISSION MINUTES MONDAY, JURE 15, 1987 page four Silverwood Park - Grading Plan Staff reported the grading plan is done and calls for 20,000 cubic yards of till. Laberee moved, Andrus seconded, to recommend to Council that they direct Staff to take any and all clean fill up to 20,000 cubic yards for use in Silverwood Park. Motion carried unanimously. Crescent Beach Council Liaison Brancel reported she had spent a lot of time at Crescent Beach last weekend. She brought up the following issues: - The weed problem is really bad, up to 4 feet of floating weeds. She asked who cleaned the beach. Niccum replied that Shorewood and Tonka Bay crews alternate maintenance every morning, but not on weekends. Brancel asked if the lifeguards are responsible for keeping it clean on weekends. - 3 caps are missing off the dock. - A lifeguard was sitting in a lawn chair on the dock with her back to some swimmers. - Why does the lifeguard blow her whistle and call everyone out of the water? - The lifeguard told someone on a floatation device that was outside beach limits and had not entered from the beach that they were breaking an Ordinance. Why? Staff will research above. FIRARCES $6,659 was received in park dedication fees. REPORTS None ADJOURNMENT Christensen moved, Lindstrom seconded, to adjourn at 9:02 PM. Motion carried unanimously. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, SUE NICCilll DEPUTY CLERK/PARK ASSISTANT -4- CITY OF SHOREWOOD MAYOR Robert Rascop COUNCIL Jan Haugen Kristi Stover Robert Gagne Barb Brancel ADMINISTRATOR Daniel J. Vogt 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD . SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 . (612) 474-3236 MEMORANDUM TO: PARK COMMISSION AIm CITY COUNCIL FROM: SUE NICCUM DATE: .JUNE 18, 1987 RE: HISCELLABEOUS PARK ISSUES CATHCART PARK - CREOSOTE POWER POLES When Gary Carlson was present he mentioned having power poles stored behind the Cathcart tennis courts picked up by the power company. He felt the creosote was dangerous to children. Staff asked me to check with Public Works Director Zdrazil. He said we can't ask them to pick them up becuase we got them from the power company in the first place. He said he doesn't have any use for them right now but feels they can use them in the future. FREEMAN PARK MASTER PLAN Maps were sent to the Park Commission on Tuesday, June 16, 1987. Park Commission - please have your suggestions ready for the next meeting. CRESCENT BEACH I talked to Julie Light of Community Services regarding the beach questions raised in the minutes: Julie said it is the lifeguard's job to clean up weeds on weekends, however, they are not supposed to do this if anyone is in the water. She will instruct them to come 10 minutes early and call everyone out of the water while they clean the beach. The fact that they start at noon, and it's been so hot that the beach has been really crowded when they arrive has caused the problem. Also, there was a substitute on duty that Saturday, that person was not as familiar with various procedures. . There is a lifeguard meeting coming up and Julie will go over everything we discussed with the lifeguards. Light informed me that when someone is close to the beach on a floatation device the lifeguards are instructed to inform them that floatation devices are allowed on part of Excelsior beach and to suggest they go over there. A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore MKMORAlmUM MISCELLABEOUS PARK ISSUES .JURE 18, 1987 page two CRESCENT BEACH - CONTIBUIID Light also said when a beach is in a residential area, they have to be concerned with people abusing the use of private property next to the beaches. She also said if one person is using a floatation device right outside the beach area, it can encourage other people to do the same, if there were several people outside the actual beach limits on these devices, it would end up with the lifeguard guarding half the lake. The guards are taught to do drills. They blow their whistle and call every- one out of the water for 5 minutes. This allows families to reunite, mothers to keep track of their children, and mothers and lifeguards to take a restroom break. They are encouraged to do these drills when the weather is hot and the beach is crowded, maybe 5-6 times a day, if the weather is coller and there are only a few people, they may not be necessary at all. Light felt it would probably be impossible, too dangerous, to screen off the weeds. She suggested I check with the DNR. I talked to Howard Krosch at the DNR about the weed problem and whether it is possible to screen off the area in any way. He said the main problem with weeds right now is a weed called "Curly Leaf Pond Weed". It has a short life cycle, then it dies. He said the season should be over in about 1-2 weeks. Regarding screening of the beach, he told me that the "Hennepin County Park Reserve District" has closed off a couple beaches. They have used a very expensive process, using oil spill screen and having it custom made. The reason in their case was to prevent "swimmer's itch". He did suggest a inexpensive method of control that their rules allow. That is taking 3' lengths of cheap plastic, draping them over the buoy ropes, weighting them with light chain or bolts, and stapling them to the ropes. They do not have to go all the way to the bottom, in fact they prefer that they don't. I informed Julie Light of this conversation. She will have her lifeguards keep an eye on the weed situation and keep me informed. I will report on this at the July 7th meeting. ~ CITY OJ!' SHOREWOOD PLANNING CatMISSION MEETING TUESDAY. 16 JUNE 1987 COUNCIL CHAMBERS 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD 7:30 P.M. M I NUT E S CALL TO ORDER Chair Watten called the meeting to order at 7:34 P.M. ROLL CALL Present: Chair Watten: Commissioners Leslie. Benson (7:37 P.M.). Mason. Schultz. Robertson: Council Liaison Stover: Planner Nielsen: Plan. Asst. Helgesen. Absent: Commissioner Spellman (excused). APPROVAL OJ!' MINUTES Schultz moved. seconded by Leslie to approve the minutes of 2 June 1987 as written. Motion carried unanimously. 7:30 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING - SETBACK VARIANCE/VARIANCE TO INCREASE THE NONCONFORMITY OJ!' A NONCONFORMING STRUCTURE Eric Danser - 21640 Lilac Lane In April of 1987 Mr. Danser was found to be constructing a screen porch onto the deck located on the south end (front) of his home without having applied for a building permit. Tbe construction encroaches into the front yard setback (50 feet) of his property which is located in the R-1A zoning district. Mr. Danser is requesting a 13.4 foot front yard variance to allow him to complete the porch. Staff analysis of the request shows that the variance does not appear justified based on criteria provided in the Zoning Ordinance. Public portion of the public hearing opened at 7:38 P.M. Public portion of the public hearing closed at 7:38 P.M. without comment. Schultz said he finds it hard to believe that with all the information circulated about building regulations (e.g. City newsletter. etc.). that anyone would be ignorant of the laws. He said that with all of the buildable area on Mr. Danser's property. a variance for the requested location does not seem justified. Benson said he feels the setbacks across the street in Chanhassen being less should lend room for negotiation. although rezoning the area seems too severe. Leslie asked if there have been any other cases where increasing the nonconformity was granted. Planner Nielsen said John Hodgdon was allowed to increase a nonconformity with his garage setback. but he also removed two more nonconforming structures from his property. Leslie said she doesn't feel that allowing the porch to be built on the front of the house would do anyone any harm. but: she said she is concerned about setting precedence. Mr. Danser said that finances are also a hardship for him. Minutes Planning Commission Meeting 16 June 1987 J Danser variance. continued: Schultz moved. seconded by Robertson to recommend to Council denial of the variance request based on lack of hardship. Motion to deny tied by roll call vote - 3 ayes (Watten. Schultz. Robertson) - 3 nays (Leslie. Benson. Mason). This item will appear on the Council agenda of 22 June 1987. BRENTRIDGE - RECONSIDERATION OF REZONING AND PRELIMINARY PLAT Dave Johnson - 25.9 acres. approx. 150 feet east of Howards Point Road and 250 feet north of Smithtown Road Mr. Dave Johnson (developer of Shorewood Oaks) has taken assignment of the Brentridge development from United Mortgage Corporation. The plat as presented by United Mortgage for a 26 lot subdivision was denied by the City Council. Mr. Johnson requested that the Council postpone acceptance of the Findings of Facts in order to allow him to represent a revised plat for reconsideration. Chair Watten re-opened the public hearing at 7:55 P.M. at the recommendation of Planner Nielsen. Planner Nielsen gave a review of the presentation to date. submitted a 24 lot preliminary plat. The lots average 155 square feet in area on the west side of the proposed road. He said that Mr. Johnson has feet in width and 26.339 Mr. Johnson reported that the consensus of the neighborhood meeting was that they would support a 24 lot subdivision. He said he would agree to place protective covenants on the development to assure quality homes similar to or greater than the value of that which exists on Howards Point Rd. He will relocate trees from the Shorewood Oaks project and place them in locations agreeable to the adjacent lot owners. He said he would be paying for improvements to the project rather than assessing. Jerry Brecke. 27450 Pine Bend. said he doesn't think changing two lots does a whole lot for the subdivision. He said a previous owner of the property was denied a lower density zoning because the former Planning Commission didn't think the property should be changed. Mr. Johnson responded that the Comprehensive Guide Plan shows that the area should be down zoned to half-acre lots. Don Anderson. Howards Point Road. feels the development should stay with the 30.000 square foot lots as previous recommended by the Planning Commission. Sally Brown. 5875 Howards Point Rd. said the Planning Commission should stick to the current zoning. and consider the neighbors who have to look at it. Mr. Johnson commented that the existing neighborhood contains more density than what is proposed. - 2 - Minutes Planning Commission Meeting 16 ,June 1987 Brentridge reconsideration. continued: Susan Sano. 5685 Howards Point Rd.. said that the recommended trail easements should necessitate elimination of at least one more lot. Bill Gabby. 5705 Howards Point Rd.. said that although he would like to see the density along the swamp reduced. his major concern was the lots that are adjacent to his property. He said that Mr. Johnson has reduced the lots that are adjacent and he therefore supports the project. Eileen Gallagher (owner of subject property) said that she bought the land to develop it and it has proven to be a hardship. A resident on Pine Bend said he is concerned that lowering the zoning will set a precedence on down the road. Sally Brown said she isn't against sale or development of the land. she opposes rezonng. She asked what is happening with the EAW. Planner Nielsen said that a memo from the Quality Review Board stated that the need for an EAW would have to be considered prior to final approvals. Public portion of the public hearing closed at 8:23 P.M. Schultz asked what the Comp Plan refers for this area and why is wasn't zoned accordingly. Planner Nielsen said that the Plan states that this area would be appropriate for 1 to 2 units per acre because of the existing lot sizes along Howards Point Road. but the City chose to decide rezoning on a case by case basis. or at the time of proposed development. rather than rezone that land all at once. Watten asked about the average lot sizes and widths along the east side of the proposed road. Mr. Johnson read aloud the individual lot sizes. the average being approximately 25.000 square feet. Average lot width is 100 feet. Watten said that it seems it is the consensus of the neighbors that they could live with 30.000 square foot lots. Benson said that would require the plat to be reduced to 21 to 22 lots. Schultz said that if the lots along the east side of the proposed road were reduced by two. the development would be more aesthetically pleasing. He said he appreciates what Mr. Johnson has done on the west side of the road. Schultz moved. seconded by Leslie to recommend to Council to rezone the property to R-1B. 30.000 square foot minimum lot sizes. Planner Nielsen reminded the Commission that an R-1B zoning would require that all lots be 30.000 square feet and 110 feet wide at the minimum. Leslie commented that this motion does not address the request at hand. which is a request for approval of a rezoning to R-1C. not oR-lB. Schultz withdrew his motion. Leslie concurred. - 3 - . Minut es Planning Commission Meeting 16 June 1987 Brentridge reconsideration. continued: Schultz moved. seconded by Leslie to recommend to Council denial of the request to rezone the property to R-IC. Motion carried by roll call vote - 5 ayes - 1 nay (Benson). Leslie commented that she is concerned about rezoning the area to R-IB at this time because it would lock in the lot sizes to 30.000 square foot minimum. when a developer could present a very decent plat with variation from 25.000 to 32.000 square foot lots. Planner Nielsen cautioned that the Commission should be careful not to apply zoning to a particular plat. but rather apply zoning appropriate to the land itself. Mr. Johnson said he would like the Commission to consider making a statement to the Council that they would recommend approval of rezoning to R-IC contingent upon specifics being applied to a particular plat design. Schultz said tbat he would like to see a guideline established consistent with the Comp Plan for development of this area. Schultz moved. seconded by Watten to recommend to Council that the property be rezoned to R-IB. 30.000 square foot lots. It was noted that a Planned Unit Development would allow for the flexibility desired by the developer. Motion to recommend rezoning to R-IB tied by roll call vote - 3 ayes (Mason. Watten. Schultz) - 3 nays (Leslie. Benson. Robertson). Benson moved. seconded by Leslie to recommend to Council denial of the preliminary plat based on the proposed density. Motion carried unanimously. This item will appear on the Council agenda of 22 June 1987. MATTERS FRG1 THE FLOOR None. REPORTS Discussed was the disposition of the house next to City Hall. ADJOURNMENT Leslie moved. seconded by Watten to adjourn the meeting at 9:09 P.M. Respectfully submitted. Patti Helgesen Planning Assistant - 4 - . j 5 A AJt:., (If. /f;zf/1...-- 6 E /! I c. I ~,j;; 1~ Q..,j J [-/b- J ;/.,4v 6 /u J o.!J .}fT.. 7? ~)....J 7Zi~. l:U'\?o S t:-,) .~)ZC-t.L (flt 1 7rIf- . /'-" I ?;Zo)V T<iy:.:7/I:r;K:- ~ S i?, J-:, .,iiJ~c~ 1(It: !/~~.Jb~L/3;yL~ 4,Ni) /)u-('~;JT H>fJr~~L -rV /S l' .lz1b (! Ci <; ~. To '17 rH5... ) ;"')'Lb--C;-' , /! }jZ/lku ()/ ~' f tv\ f\~c.. $. Ln,rD A. S I M c.. ox 2l bOO LlL.A.C- L~. ~.~. ~ . (iLg CL ./"hU ~~~ ?~ D O--vt ~~ j- ~ ~ diit~~ tI2 ~ cy~ ~ ~ ~ cJ)~~ ~(U) .JOr\N ~ R..UT\-\ \SR~c...~\-\~\M~(L 2\1\0 L\L~c-Lt\.J, '0\1 ') ,/9'17 Ck>a--~1~~r~ ~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~Qk>~~ t;-I:L ~i~~' ~ B~~ .;2. I 7 l' ~ rf!-:1.. c./ ~ ~ ~. ,Vtl"""- ~- S 3 ~ ( ~ b, t bE:_R_j\J \ E:. ~ -\ f\ Q., N\ f\ ~ 2 \ 1 BO L\ \.-.A.c.. L \oJ . ~ ~ q, \q~l ~ d ~e' \j~'cx51 or- ~\'\~ d~ ~V-LC- ~vb,e)rJ we- he V~ ~t'l DIo je~-\{()yts .-\-f) -t\f\ci v Wl \~^~ d S,CfCCV\GJ t>~ ~ ~_ -tvn~ ()+- --\tIe l ~ .\X) use.. . !)11{ . IJ vYiJ, {' . ~!/W '7( p /110 cd /f.~~~ SI\V\A. ~ MAlL't TA~c.. SUV1COX b l 8>0 ~vhLL ST. Metropolitan Council of the Twin Cities Area 300 Metro Square Building, 7th and Robert Streets St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 Tel. 612 291-6359/TDD 291-0904 DATE: May 28, 1987 TO: Metropolitan Systems Committee FROM: Ann Braden, Transportation SUBJECT: Highway 7 Study PROPOSED ACTION To make final recommendations on the Hwy. 7 Corridor Study and submit it to the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT). ..... BACKGROUND The purpose of the Hwy. 7 Study was to develop a plan to improve the operation of Hwy. 7 as a regional highway while. accommodating planned growth in the area. MnDOT and the cities of Chanhassen, Deephaven, Excelsior, Greenwood, Minnetonka and Shorewood participated in the study. The Metropolitan Council was the lead agency for the study. BRW, Inc. was the consultant on the project. The study was conducted during 1986 and was completed in December of tha t year. The six participating communities submitted positions on the report in January, 1987. The following month the Systems Committee reviewed the report's recolllDendations and the community responses to them. The reaction to the report was mixed; Chanhassen, Deephaven and Minnetonka generally supported the recommendations; Greenwood, Excelsior and Shorewood were seriously concerned about specific project recommendations affecting their communities. The committee recommended that staff continue to meet with the cities to fine- tune some of the recommendations in order to reach compromise positions. STUDY RECOMMENDATIONS The study recommends: 1. A four-lane expressway as the long-range plan for the six mile stretch of highway west of Hwy. 101. - 2. ,Reducing the number of direct access points from 43 scattered, uncoor- dinated locations to five signalized intersections within the study area spaced at approximately one mile intervals. Signalized at-grade intersections with HWY.7are recommended at Hwy. 101, Vine Hill Road, ChristllBs Lake Road, CR 19 and Hwy. 41. 3. An interchange at St. Alban's Bay Road/Covington Road which would provide full access to Hwy. 7 for the areas both north and south of the highway. ~, 3 ,< OUTCOME OF DISCUSSIONS WITH COMMUNITIES Council and MnDOT staff analyzed Greenwood's positions and believe most of their concerns can be adequately addressed. Discussions with the City of Excelsior lead to a compromise recommendation. Discussions with the City of Shorewood and the developer were not as fruitful. Shorewood continues to support its original plan for the Vine Hill intersection (alternative 1) in the report. Staff proposed a different alternative as a "compromise" which is also compatible with the Waterford developer's plans. Responses to the individual communities' positions are described below: GREENWOOD Greenwood opposes upgrading the Christmas Lake Rd. intersection and recommends removing the existing traffic signal and installing a center median to permit only right-in and right-out turns from both the north and south sides of the Highway. The City also wants a barrier constructed on the north side of Highway 7 to protect pedestrians and bicyclists. ... . o Response ( Removing the traffic signal and installing a median to prevent other than right- in and right-out movements at Christmas Lake Rd. would seriously affect local traffic patterns by causing unsuitable and inconvenient access to the east for Greenwood residents and to the west for Shorewood residents; increasing traffic volumes on Mill Street and, impeding access to the public boat launch on Christmas Lake. A barrier to protect bicyclists and pedestrians using the path on the north side of Hwy. 7 could be an appropriate safety measure. However, the pathway was constructed by the city on the Hwy. 7 right-of-way by permit from MnDOT. The path is in the location of the city's choosing, adjacent to Hwy. 7. MnDOT had suggested that it be built north of the frontage road away from Hwy. 7 traffic. Under these circumstances Greenwood bears responsibility for constructing a protective barrier. MnDOT does not object to a barrier as such, provided that safety and design standards are met. EXCELSIOR The City of Excelsior objects to the design standards required to develop a "partially controlled access expressway", especially as it relates to elimination of businesses along Hwy. 7. The city is also opposed to the recommended alternate for Excelsior Area East if it means closure of Division Street north of Hwy. 7 (which would affect business access) and the Mill Street access onto Hwy. 7 because it would take four homes. The city finds the recommended alternate for Excelsior Area West acceptable, if reasonable access can be retained for all existing businesses along the north side of Hwy. 7. 5 o Resp onse The relocation of Hwy. 1 to the north in the vicinity of the high school was never considered a viable alternative because of the expense. Shorewood continues to support its original proposal (alternate 1) for a new access to Hwy. 1 at Old Market Rd., between Vine Hill Road and St. Alban's Bay Road/Covington Road. Alternate 1 is the lowest ranked of the study alternatives, including the "do-nothing" alternate. Old Market Road is being constructed as a collector street to serve the development and traffic originating south of it. Construction has stopped approximately one-quarter of a mile south of Hwy. 1. Shorewood's objection to the improvements recommended in the report for Vine Hill Road intersection is that they could not afford to acquire the needed right-of-way. The City does not present any costs for their proposal to compare to the Vine Hill option. The grade separation at St. Alban's Bay Road was proposed because the topography lends itself to this type of intersection, which would be less expenSive, in this unusual instance, than constructing an at-grade intersection. ~. ( DSU, Inc., consultants for Trivesco, state "the solution found in Alternative 5 is far less expensive and more practical than the grade separated bridge solution (recommended alternative 4)." This suggestion was discussed with Shorewood and the developer. The City does not believe a north-south connection between Old Market Road and St. Alban's Bay Road is necessary but they do not express specific objections to the concept. FINDINGS 1. That the Hwy. 1 Corridor Report recommendations represent a good, long-term access plan for the highway, supported by MnDOT and consistent with Council transporta tion policy plan criteria for major arterials. 2. The alternatives recommended for the Vine Hill/Old Market Road and Excelsior Area East are not supported by Shorewood, Greenwood and Excelsior. 3. The Vine Hill intersection, although located in Shorewood, provides an important access to Highway 1 for Minnetonka, Deephaven and Chanhassen residents. 4. Shorewood's objection to Vine Hill/Old Market alternative 4 is based on its cost. However, sufficient cost information is not available to support this con ten tion. 4. Greenwood's proposed removal of Christmas Lake Rd. traffic signal and installation of a center median would seriously affect local traffic patterns, increase traffic on Mill St. and impeded public boat launch access. RECOMMENDATIONS 1. That the Metropolitan Council adopt the Highway 1 Corridor Study report, acknowledge community position statements and responses to them and submit both to MnDOT with the following recommendations: 7 CITY OF SHOREWOOD MAYOR Robert Raseop COUNCIL Jan Haugen Kristi Stover Robert Gagne Barb Brancel ADMINISTRATOR Daniel J. Vagt 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD . SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 . (612) 474-3236 June 1. 1987 Mr. Steven Keefe. Chair Metropolitan Council 300 Metro Square Building 7th and Robert Streets St. Paul. MN 55101 ~- Subject: Trunk Highway 7 Corridor Study Dear Mr. Keefe: (. The Shorewood City Council has directed me to write you this letter to share our thoughts regarding the T.H. 7 Corridor Study which is in the final approval process by the Metropolitan Council. A number of years ago. the City of Shorewood adopted a Comprehensive Plan to guide us into the future. Part of the Plan dealt with transportation policies. A transportation need suggested for further study in the Plan was the upgrading of the intersection of Vine Hill Road with T.H. 7. A traffic study was subsequently completed by the City in 1984 which proposed a way to address this problem. Upon submittal of our study which came to the Met Council in the form of a Comp Plan Amendment. a new intersection onto T.H. 7 was sugg.ested to be constructed which would coincide with proposed commercial and residential development in the area. A study of the entire T.H. 7 corridor from T.H. 101 to the western boundary of Chanhassen then ensued and is now complete. The T.H. 7 Corridor Study Final Report does not agree with the alternative suggested by Shorewood with regards to the Vine Hill Road area. The Shorewood proposal calls for traffic traveling south of T.H. 7 to use a new intersection known as Old Market Road rather than tbe existing Vine Hill Road intersection. Traffic would continue to use Vine Hill Road north of T.H. 7 as it exists today. The proposed Old Market Road intersection is located approximately 2000 feet west of the Vine Hill Road intersection. The findings of the Corridor Study suggest two full movement intersections. One located at Vine Hill Road. and one located at Old Market Road. A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore ,.... ( t AGURE 35 <( LEGEND RECOMMENDED LONG RANGE ACCESS PLAN rn TRAFFIC SIGNAL w z :i :r c 1-. ,". ~ :>-1 ~.H. 7 CORRIDOR .It STUDY ;n~~l\' - - - ". .. .... . ( ~ ... I- C/) e:( W e:( W a: e:( a: o - (J) -' wW lilt) ~x ~III ;..:?:.i;_';c~:"'}"~:";~---;: ~ [ [ c: o ''-; ~ ~ c: (lj e e o c.; ~ l:.:: CJ en .,..; e o "'" c. e o u ~ , .- ~ ~ CI : ~ C ~ Q: Q:: C c..; C\I W ~ l- e:( Z c: W I- ...J' d' l'- ::c ~ ~ (' \ FIGURE 22 VINE HILL ROAD/OLD MARKET ROAD ALTERNATIVE 4: Recommended in Report T.H. 7 CORRIDOR STUDY n.....r-1-J (f!) I&I~\\' o 100 200 400 600 F..t ., 13 ..j . Mayor Tom Hamilton Chanhas~en City Hall 690 Coulter Drive Chanhassen, MN 55317 June 19, 1987 QUESTIONS RAISED BY THE TETON / LILAC LANE ISSUE SAFETY It is my understanding that one aspect of the current consideration of "Teton" and Lilac Lane involves safety requirements for future Chanhassen residents. In my opinion, a "Teton" and Lilac Lane connection to future streets may not be the best solution. 1. It is not the most direct access for future residents to potential sites of residents. 2. Alternative, shorter accesses are available. 3. It is a right angle access at "Teton" and Lilac Lane and not a right angle meeting of Lilac and the County roads. 4. The Lilac Lane traffic must merge with county traffic of confusing speeds. Thirty MPH from the left and 45MPH from the ri ght. 5. A traffic increase on "Teton" and Lilac Lane will deminish the safety of current residents. 6. What are the Cities critera for evaluating citizen safety in respect to roads? FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY It is my understanding, at this time, that adjacent property holders to "Teton" and Lilac Lane are likely to be financially burdened by potential changes. Many of the potentially affected property holders will be asked to finance the access changes providing service to future Chanhassen residents, but receive decreased safety and no identifiable increase in service or general environment. It is also likely, that to incur the financial burden, they will be required to sell their land to satisfy safety and planning requirements. 1. Are my assumptions true? 2. Is it normal Chanhassen and Shorewood practice to asses~ residents for "improvements" to meet the objectives of developers? 3. Has Chanhassen or Shorewood ever required a developer to bear the financial burden of "improvements" required for its' project? 4. What is Chanhassens' and Shorewoods' criteria for weighing financial responsibility of the current residents for .~he community and the benefit and profit of (1) a developer? (2) Future residents? ~ E'v'ALUA T ION OF "TETON II I under-stand that the use o.f "Teton" and Li 1 ac Lane is bei ng eval uated by an "Independent Engi neer-" hi n,?d by the Ci ty of Chanhassen. 1. What, pr-ecisely, ar-e the items of this evaluation? 2. When will this evaluation be made available to the public? 0. When will the Chanhassen City Council respond to the contents of the evaluation? 4. Assuming Lilac lane is included in the evaluation, when will Shor-ewood r-espond to the evaluation? F'DTEI'.rr I (iL ~;TATLJ~3 i]F II 'TETUI\I II I ~'./ould appF'eciate claTific:at.ion of "T~?t.on" issues. F'I'-esent.at.ion~, at Chanhassen Planning Commission and City Council meetings implied potent.ial change in owner-ship of "Tet.on" fn::im an indivicjual to a Cor-por-ation, and subsequent potential of abandonment or- donation to the City of Chanhassen. 1. What ar-e the pr-oceedur-es of a pr-oper-ty owner (1) abondoning land encumber-ed with multiple easements and utilities? (2) Donating such land to a unit of public gover-nment? 2. What ar-e the r-ights and obligations of easement holder-s (1) if the land over- which t.hey hold easement is abondoned? (2) Is donated to a unit of public govenment? 3. What are the rights and obligations of a unit of public gover-nment that has within its' boundr-ies (1) abondoned land encumber-ed by easements and utilites? (2) Receives as a donation ~:;uch 1 and? 4. What is the impact (1) on utilites involved in suc:htransfer-s? (2) The user-s of those utilities? I hope that at some pr-oper-, r-ecor-ded for-um or- in cor-r-espondence these questions will be clear-Iy answer-ed. Sincer-ely, /1 /J/J (~4~ Ann B. Ware, 1225 Lilac Lane, Excelsior-, Chanhassen, Car-ver- County, Minnesota MN 55TJl cc: Don Ashwor-th, Chanhassen City Manager- & City of Shor-ewood Fi:ober-t Rascop, 1"1ayor-, ~ ,JUN 0 9 IJIl ~ ~~/~1 City of Snorewooci To whom it iliay concern, This letter is in reference to tne Shorewood Ci ty Council f"leeting scheduled. i'or June 2, 1987 concernin~ tne buila.ing variance applied. f'or o~ ~r. rieil Spalaing. J onn ri. Stincnfield ana Susan :;jtinchf'ielu. resia.in..s at 27705 Islana. View R.oad would oppose any action ~..Tlicn in any way' "wula. restrict or limit our tieeueci easement (1175051) i'or pedestrian access to LaKe l',dnnetonl~a over Lot 1 aucii tors suu- u.ivision number 367 as shown in aeed document number 034740 as referred. to in deed. aocument number 650040 :files of registrar of titles. ThanK you. Sincerely, AIL~~ ~n H. Stinchfield 27785 Island View Road Shorewood, MN 55331 474-6828 f I lit ...... Doc .No.. 634748 I .' 748 ~ 1- 'l~!lO Il'fIJB1ft'URE lIII1de thlG 8th 9)' of July, 1960, between ... P'RAKK ECia.ti1ID and GATIlERDCE T. 1ilCKLUND, huabaDd and wUe uf the County ot !lOMepIn and :;tl\tc of MilUM!lIota. parties of the tint part, and EIlWAJID G. THERRBLL, '.f UIC r.,Jun~y of Hennepln IUId State uf H1nneeota. party of the llcr~()nd pnrt. IlITNESSE'l'H : 'l'bat the .al4 perti.. of the tir.t pert, tur one Dollar and other vnll.Anblc ~o/llJideration, the receipt vhCl1"OOf is hcrcb:' 1!,.!:110111cdr:ed, do h"l".,lJ)' G1"!l.nt. llo.rt)l11n, QuIt ClaIm and Convey, without \lIIJTftnty ';f tlt1<:. 1,/1110') \;he said ~rty of the secund part, hID hell'1l and osslgnu. Forevcr. 1\ non-cxc1uu1ve t'flUCllMrt. forpe4.t.l't&lt:lICe... to IJI,kc M1Jmetonko. over and acroae a t.l"fl<:t ,Jf :.'.1:<1 lylnr. r,nd be108 In tbe Count)" t1f Bem1ep1n and State 'Jf /olIMcaoh. dcc:rlb.'d 1).:; f011011S, to-"lt: Lot 1, Auditor'e Subdivi.ion 10. ~67, lIonnepln Count.y, 1'J.nnuot.a, accord.11l6 to the p1a\ thereat on tile and of record In the oftlce of the Jlecllltrar of Titlee 1n and tor lIennepin Count)' :,);:' tile benefit of the tl'tl,ltO ot lAnd 1)'i08 and belnc 1:'\ th~ County of :lcn.ncptn. state ot MiM"ota, described. .. to1lOVll. 1.0-,,1\:: J.,.:>t.s 14, 1S, 16, 17, 1.8 an.! 19. Audltor'lI flubd":lRbn 1'0. 36'" HWMpl11 County; !'.lODesota. "'e~orUInt; w the plat thereof' on fUe and of record. ln the off'.<:c of the ReGistrar at Tltl.. 1n and tor eaId HennepIn County. -n,e part1 ot the sooond JlIU't, fof' hllll8eU. hlll heirll lUld aulgns. hereby a(;f'ces liS to110118: I. flct to place or cau.f' to bl! placed. any bIIUdlng or ~thrr struo\ure over, under OJ" u~n lIald Lot. 1, except 1~ parties ot the flf'at ~~, t.helr heirs Rnd aSllign8. ,', To keep I'M !M1ntain s,,14 Lot 1 at all tl:llell In !\ ""!'It., elMn aM sare cOMI Uon. ;. 'fo J ndellln.\ t,. and hold haNl.ell the Ji'U'U"o of t.h,' f,re!. part, th~1r heir. and ...1gna. trom ~ el~l~ "rllllng outot "II,. InJ\U"1 01" 48th Of' prol'l.rty da~(" (J~currll\ft In. on 01" about "aid Lot 1. 4.>1',) ,...y OJ" >'111lu..t<.. be paId vt100 lfu(lf'cl\1 t'ltl\tc ta...,.......lIIlInt.. Md l'Itl\e1' I'lM'I'8'" lev1 iJd. ('r. ""11"11.611 apll'\1ttnld fAt 10 E xh i bit A tiled 8-19-60 ( ",-.,~ , . . '\' " ., '.'\; .1 t..d .:.~,Jf~ .... . , I ,.., OIl WI r'l1 4a't of JulJ, 1960, betore ., a Nota17 Public wiWa an4 tor 11I14 Count1, ~1OIa1.17 appeared !c1wr4 O. 'n1ernell, to .. knon to lie , the penon c1..aribe4 in and wbo exeClUtecS the torelOlng lnltJ'UMnt an4 aeknowl", tIIet. be IDClU'tecl the _ a. hi. tree act an\ d~Pd., .. ";". ' \ , '::... N-,-.; \ '., <. ':~<.:.'.' .~,> ..;~..:. '// ;,..'. \i~.. .' . I".; .,:,J ....; . ''')<./ ....q ; '.:: ';;.;,(, - . .'~,~...".'..~..., '/ . ;,. ," l.( \. . .,.j":',,___f f Gl . - -. Partiee or the fir.t part hereby certify thut the State 'l'ranIter Tax due the State ot MinnelOta under this indenture 18 $1.10. IN TESTIMONY WHERroP', till parties hereto haV1! hereunto eet their band. the day an4 year f1rst aboV1! written. In t.bePreeence at: \---.. ( \ ".'~' , 3J- .~ / /-) ( , YLI1-J- ~ L'. 7C-~~ J. Prank Eeklund (t.iiJu,"~ i~ ;-:'.\: t:.(.d~ ~ther111e T. Ecklun4 qw -/' f' :J,. ; 1 '\' ,,,---:- ( . I ',...., 'l \\ .~' 4&.J :P r .~'r' t I . ,CfIt'K'-{.f.2t?i.;;;J/f 8'.rATI fir MIJQII:BO'U) )88 caJI'l'f C1t IIDIIIPIW) OIl W. 8th _ or ~, 1960, Mfore .., a Hotal7 Public wiWn aD4 for lUeS Count,., perllOllllll7 appeareeS J. Prank Eeklund an4 ~ther1ne '1'. BckluD4, hulbeD4 an4 wife, to .. ~ to be the person. deecribed 111 and ,"'c(~ the tONID01I111DIIt~ and acknow1edpd that thl1 exeellte4 :.:.:'~"".a. their tree act and eSeecl. \ ' ._ ( .J" '; ..y..:.... \ \ ~Zr.':~~~~:~..)::, . ~ \'" \~ J. T~~\ /. "!.I' .:...:'. .,. .....,. ~ ....._ COllftlY. ..... . \.:."..... ... ~...... t.... 'lib. 22, ."', S'l'A'1'I fir MIlI1QJJ(7fA COOIfl'T or BnRIPIII 88 \ , JOMN ). nn.Olt' . ~ ~'" c. H.__ C......,. ~ ...CII\Ilf'IIl.... """'" ,.,. 12. 1M . ;.~:~ ..2 I' ,..... DUD TAll ~"...." "'. rTlN. JP HlNNtPlII COU,' I.' r, ..AS.'1t ., -, ~ l5 '~ ... 1 '" ; .j" . '1'/ -I- 1 .1 0"'\ '. ~...... . Slate Form N.. .. 150USG9 He 11 79 NO. 45313 COUNTY AUDITOR'S CERTIFICATE EXECUTED PURSUANT TO SUBDIVISION (f) OF SECTION 8, CHAPTER 278, LAWS 1935. ~tate of ~inne~otat County of Hennepin }-, I,VERNON T. HOPfEAuditor of the County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota, do hereby certify that at the sale of lands pursuant to the real estate tax judgment entered in the District Court in said County on the 17th day of . April 79. d' t ' , 19__, 10 procee JOgs 0 en.orce the payment of taxes delinquent on real estate for the year 19~, for said County, which sale was held at the office of the County Auditor in said County on the 14th day of May, 19--1.9_, the following described parcel of land, situated in said County and State, to-wit: Subdivision CITY OF SHOREWOOD(26) v ~ _ Auditors Subdivision No. 367 Lot 1 34600-0400 31-117-23-11-0004 This instrument drafted by: HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY TAXATION A.6,GOVERNMENT CENTER 300 SOUTH 6th STREET MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55487 was duly bid in for the State, and that said parcel of land still remains unredeemed. I do furth~r certify that the time for redemption of said parcel of land has expired after notice given as provided by law, and that absolute title to said parcel of land has vested in the State of Minnesota. Witness my hand and official seal this 3rd day of November 82 ,19___. VERNON T. HOPPE (Seal) County Auditor, Hennepin County, Minn. By ~~';)I_.e-e.-.;ll'!;._AA-"""____ Deputy Auditor Doc.No. 1500869 Exhibit B filed 2-10-83 -~ SHOREWOOD CITY STREET SURVEY AND C~ST ESTIMATE REPAIR CODE INDEX AS OF 4 - 20 - 87 ----------------- NOTE: STREET WIDTH EST. AT 24 FT. S = SEAL COAT P = PATCH OSM COMl'l. NO. 3982.00 CS = CRACK SEALER o = 1 1/2 IN. OVERLAY L = LEVELING COL~SE G & R = GRADE & ROCK F = FABRIC WITH OVERLAY SUB = SUBGRADE 55 = STORM SEWER PRIOR ITV REPAIR EST. COST TOTAL RANK STREET C~DE NOTES LF $ / LF COST -------- --------------- -------- ------------------------------ ----- ------ . AFTON ROAD P & S EAST & WEST PC~TION 500 $1.65 $825 AFTON ROAD CS & S NORTH & SOUTH PORTION 500 $1.65 $825 BEVERLY DRIVE F 1260 $10.62 $13,381 BLUE RIOC>E LANE 0 960 $6.04 $5,798 BOULDER CIRClE P, CS, & S 1160 $1.65 $1,914 BOULDER DRIVE S & REP SETTLMNT ACROSS FR PUMPHOUSE 3000 $1.65 $4,950 CA...IED LANE F 820 $10.62 $8,708 CATHCART DRIVE F FR. NEPHEW PROP. TO 5MITHTOWN RD 655 $10.62 $6,956 * CATHCART [~IVE S FR. BEVERLY TO SMITHTOWN RD 2570 $1.65 $4,241 CHASKA ROAD S FR MAYFLOWER TO HWY 7 1200 $1.65 $1,980 CHASKA ROAD 0 FROM MAYFLOWER TO SOUTH 1200 $6.04 $7,248 CHRISTMAS LAKE ROAD P 3000 0 $0 ClUB LANE P 750 0 $0 COVINGTON ROAD P & S FROM HIGHWAY 7 TO SILVER RDG. 2200 $1.65 $3,630 DELLI.100D LANE S 600 $1.65 $990 ECHO ROAD S 1880 $1.65 $3,102 * ENCHANTED LANE S 3300 $1.65 $5,445 * ENCHANTED POINT DRIVE G & R 1460 $3.42 ~ * EUREY.A ROAD S 6050 $1.65 $9,983 FATIMA PLACE S 460 $1.65 $759 GALPIN LAt-~ ROAD S 2230 $1. 65 $3,680 GLENCOE ROAD S 1370 $1.65 $2,261 GRANT LC~ENZ ROAD 0 3040 $6.04 $18,362 GRANT STREET S 600 $1. 65 $990 HIGHLAND CIRCLE P & S 220 $1.65 $363 HOWARDS POINT ROAD P NORTH :::ND 5490 0 $0 I VY LANE P 1000 0 $0 KNIGHTSBRIDGE ROAD C.S 1830 0 $0 LAKEWAY TERRACE S 1200 $1. 65 $1,980 LEE CIRCLE P 240 0 $0 LILAC LANE S 1070 $1.65 $1,766 * MANN LANE S 660 $1.65 $1,089 * MANOR ROAD S 4475 $1. 6.5 $7,3€.4 MAYFLOWER ROAD L & 0 660 $8.78 $5,795 MEADOWVIEW LANE S 640 $1.65 $1,056 NELSINE DRIVE P, L, & S 420 $4.93 $2,071 OAK RIDGE CIRCLE P & S 500 $1.65 $825 PARK STREET S 2000 $1.65 $3,300 RADISSON ENTRANCE P 220 0 $0 RUSTIC WAY P 460 0 $0 * SEAMANS DRIVE S 1800 $1.65 $2,970 SHADY ISLAND CIRCLE P & S 1160 $1.65 $1,914 SHADY ISLAND ROAD P 1200 0 $0 SMITHTOWN ROAD S 13460 $1. 65 $22, 209 * 5T. ALBANS BAY ROAD S 3700 $1.65 $6,105 STAR CIRCLE P INTERSECTION 250 0 $0 STAR LANE L 600 $3.39 $2,034 '< ~ . if STRAWBERRY LANE S 2610 $1.65 $4,307 SUNNY VALE LANE P ~ S 550 $1.65 $908 SYLVAN LANE P 320 0 $0 TI MBER LANE L & S REQUIRES GUARD RAILS 1830 $4.93 $9,022 VALLEYWOOD CIRCLE P & S 230 $1.65 $380 VALLEYWOOD LANE P & S 1470 $1.65 $2,426 WEDGEWOOD ROAD P & 0 FROM MALLARD LANE TO EAST END 500 $6.04 $3,020 WEDC>EWOOD ROAD S FR MALLARD LA TO SMITHTOWN RD 2300 $1.6.5 $3,795 WOODS IDE LANE P & S EAST AND WEST SECTION 240 $1.65 $396 WEST 62 ND. ST. WIDEN ROAD 1300 ~J ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SlIBTOTAL 94070 L. F. $202,631 -------- -------- 17.8 MILES ========================================================================================================== SlIBTRACT OllT --------- * CATHCART DRIVE S 62 TO BEVRLY ~ NEPHEW PR. TO SMITHTWN 1555 $1.65 $2,566 if ENCHANTED LANE S 3300 $1.65 $5,445 * ENCHANTED POINT DRIVE G & R 1460 $3.42 $4,993 if EUREKA ROAD S 6050 $1.65 $9,983 * MANN LANE S 660 $1.65 $1,089 * MANOR ROAD S 1750 $1.65 $2,888 * SEAMANS DRIVE S 1800 $1.65 $2,970 * ST. ALBANS BAY ROAD S 3700 $1.65 $b,105 * STRAWBERRY LANE S 2610 $1.65 $4,307 ========================================================================================================== TOTAL 22885 L. F. $40,344 ------- -------- 4.3 MILES ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- GRAND TOTAL 71185 L. F. $162,287 ------- ---- 13.5 MILES ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- OUTLINE OF CONSIDERATIONS for ANNEXING OF ADJACENT HOUSE TO THE SHOREWOOD CITY HALL June 22, 1987 FUNCTIONAL CONSIDERATIONS Layout of spaces/Inefficiencies Vaulted ceilings/Lighting problems BUILDING CODE CONSIDERATIONS Accessibility for the handicapped: hallway doors toilets/distance Stairs Headroom in basement Energy/Reroofing BUILDING SYSTEMS CONSIDERATIONS Electrical/Inadequacies: new service required dedicated circuits lighting Mechanical/Inadequacies: no central air link requires 3rd system Structural/Inadequacies: floor not designed for file load AESTHETIC CONSIDERATIONS Connecting link General remodeling CITY USE CONSIDERATIONS Departments/Size Circulation/Inefficiencies: inter-departmental public Information & data transmission COST CONSIDERATION Initial purchase cost of property: $124,000 Link construction cost (estimated):$ 21,900 Remodeling cost (estimated) $ 32,000 TOTAL $177,900 (Above construction costs include contractor's overhead & profit @ 15% and a contingency of 5%) ! , . -Of' " cu' '0 , eel 01 \\ .c ~. 0 I W., j~ /'~ ~ ,:*,,)', . ~~'::(;).~, """"',' '., ~~~w ~~~6 , ~ 'W ~ 'l')O ::>':2 ~\.\J __\I) z: -- .-l ii ..J / r peotj qnlO JfJ1UnOO , Z .- \U~~ ~?i ~~~ I~ U]-:.:2 __-- ~X<( ..J~ ~~~ .wO - ~ ~ Q Z <! w ~ ~ : t I i , !w ~ 'i '::/. ~ ~ 't: ~ ..-. J , , : , r 'i. "l. :i ..9 Z j;: S z z: ~ ~ r.. 4 -n~H ;JI? ~1.J1l~\')(;1 /11 ~ / [ V ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~. ;< 1tl ''"\ ~ ~ j \ti > ~ z: -~ 4.: ~\\ L~ ,. rJ ~ .. >... ~ \- ii ~ L Minnesota STATE PLANNING AGENCY Room 100 Capitol Square Building 550 Cedar Street St. Paul, MN 55101 Dear Official: June 15. 1987 The State Plannina Agencv (SPA) is the administrator of Justice Assistance Act funds in Minnesota. Based on the response to the survev* sent by SPA to Minnesota criminal justice personnel, four program priorities were adopted by the Governor's Interagencv Task Force on Criminal Justice Policy for funding under the federal Justice Assistance Act. Those program priorities are: Community Crime Prevention~ Victim and Witness Assistance; Juvenile Restitution~ and Career Criminal Prosecution. To inlplement the above proarams, the SPA IS contracting with the following state agencies. It is anticipated that all available funds will be dispersed to local communities. If you are interested in more information about these programs and the grant process, you may contact: Charles Rix Minnesota Crime Watch Department of Public Safetv Transportation Building St. Paul, MN 55155 Telephone: (612)296-7541 CAREER CRIMIN~ PROSECUTION Paul Kempainen, Spec. Asst. Office of Attorney General 2nd Floor, Ford Building 117 University Avenue St. Paul, MN 55155 Telephone: (612)296-7573 or Jean Gerval. Executive Director Minnesota Countv Attornevs' Assn. 40 No. Milton St., Suite 100 St. Paul. MN 55104 Telephone: (612)227-7493 COMMUNITY CRIME PREVENTION Steohen Hennessey, Asst. Sup. Bureau of Criminal Aoorehension Department of Public Safety 1246 University Ave. St. Paul, MN 55104. Telephone: (612)642-0604 or VICTIM~P_~lTNESS ASSISTANCE Tom Lawson Department of Corrections 300 Bigelow Building 450 N. Syndicate St. Paul, MN 55104 Telephone: (612)642-0350 JUVENILE hfSTITUTION John Me Lagan Department of Corrections 300 Bigelow Building 450 N. Svndicate St. Paul, MN 55104 Teleohone: (612)642-0335 Sincerel~, ~ /~ J u-v.cAAJ - ~- Ann Jaede, Director Criminal Justice Program State Planning Agency (612)296-7819 *Copies of the survey report available uoon request. AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER "'III , . CITY OF SHOREWOOD BOARD OF REV I EW THURSDAY, MAY 28, 1987 .:. :'''''' ~ .~. > liII" . . ~ 1$ . -4, ;~.. ~~;, ;tII',. ~ ' .... c_. CHAMBERS 5755 COUNTRY CLUB 7:30 P.M. ROAD M I NUT E S CALL TO ORDER Shorewood City Counc~l 7:30 p.m. on May 28, assessed valuation placed convened as the Shorewood Board of Review at 1987, in the Council Chambers to review the on real estate property ln Shorewood. ROLL CALL Present: Mayor Rascop, Counci~ffiembers Gagne, Haugen, Brancei, and Stover. Staff Admlnistrator Vogt, Clerk Kennelly, City Assessors Rolf Erickson, Dave Wlide, Rita Guderian and Hennepin County Assessor Kermit Benson. REQUEST The tol~owlng pro~erty their assessed valuat~on. owners carne before the Council for review of Edith Jenks 26175 Wild Rose Lane Mrs. Jenks opposed the stated that the home cannot be dlVlded due to 32-117-23-13-0019 9% increase over ~ast years valuation. She was built in 1890 and was a 3 acre iot that the topography. Haugen $177,100 - 5 ayes. moved, seconded by Gagne, to reduce the valuation from to $170,700 (Land $42,900 - Bldg - $127,800) Motion carried Horton & Bernice Brooks 35-117-23-13-0029 21195 Radisson Inn Road Mr. Brooks carne to the Board of Review to dispute his 10% increase in valuation. He feels the valuation of hlS property has decreased due to the public access. He has people using hlS dock, added noise from people and dogs, noisy boats and loss of privacy. Rascop moved to reduce the valuation to $145,000 from $159,500 Motion withdrawn for lack of second. Haugen moved, seconded by Gagne, to reduce the valuation from $159,500 to $150,800 (Land $86,300 - Bldg $64,500) Motion carrled - 5 ayes. -1- / 1 :n 1..a.....l.U .....Ca::. . . May 28, 1987 page two REQUESTS - cont. R.W. Reutiman 5915 Galpin Lake Road - Homestead 34-117-23-41-0022 23365 Yellowstone Trall - Rental 34-117-23-32-0002 Mr. Reutirnan questioned the Increase In hlS valuation of his homesteaded property from $122,000 in 1986 to $130,900 in 1987. He asked if all lots increase at the same percentage. Assessor Erlckson revIewed this area and felt the Increase was Justified due to valuation end niarket pI ices. Eeutiman was not opposed to the valuatIon. CouncIl took no actIon on this request. He opposed an 11.5% increase on hIS rental property at 23365 Yellowstone TraIl. He stated that he had an "opt~0n to bu~" slgneo February 5, 1985 for $80,500.00 that can be executed within 5 years. Eaugen moved, seconded by Gagne, to reduce the 1987 valuation from $90,700 to $85,900 (Land - $39,800 - Bldg - $46,100) Motion carrled - 4 ayes - 1 nay (Rascop) Minnetonka Country Club 24575 Smithtown Road 33-117-23-31-0004 33-117-23-31-0002 33-117-23-24-0013 33-117-23-32-0014 Mr. Wltrak was present to request a reductIon in va~uatlon. The new valuation for 1987 IS $1,500,400 that a 97.8% increase over the $758,600 for 1986. Assessor Erickson ~resented golf course ratings. He stated that the County Attorneys office created the "open space laws" to be directed by the County Assessors. Mr.Witrak stated that the Country Club would have to Close if the valuation was raised to the proposed rate. Stover moved, seconded by Rascop, to keep the valuation the same rate as last year ($758,600). Stover withdrew her motion, second accepted. Haugen moved, seconded by Gagne, amended the valuatIon to $789,000 (Land - $272,000 - Bldg - $517,000) MotIon carried - 5 ayes. COUNCIL BREAK 9:04 - 9:10 John Moore 22340 Bracketts Road 32-117-23-32-0025 Mr. Moore was not present to request a valuation reductlon, he wanted to obtain Information on subdivlding hIS property and the effects it would have on the valuatIon of the new lots and the house and lot. Erickson could not give him that information until he IS presented with a tentative plan. . -2- 1'lJ.UU l.t::::> May 28, 1987 page three . . REQUESTS - cont. William J. Wintheiser 850 3rd Avenue 35-117-23-13-0012 Mr. Wintheiser was not present, Assessor Wilde reported that he has recommended a reduction 1n valuation due to a recent sale and poor repair of the structure. Haugen moved, seconded by Brancel, to accept the Assessors recommendation to reduce the valuation from $69,900 to $62,000 (Land - $26,000 - BJ.dg - $36,000) Motion carrled - 5 ayes. Janet Cradit 6040 Brand Circle Mrs. Cradit asked why valuations in the four comparables and felt the differences. 35-117-23-43-0008 there was a great deal of variation in the houses on her cul-de-sac. Erickson did valuatlons were justifIed due to siie '';J.' Mrs. Cradlt stated that she has been told her valuatIon wilL So down 10% to 15% Chrlstmas Lake Road, by cutting them Christmas lake area to Highway 7 as access by a real estate agent that due to the cul-de-sacing of off from driving thru the to their homes. Council took no action In reduction of valuatlon. They dld recommend that if the sale of the home reflected a lower valuation, than she should return at that time for an abatement. Nrs. Lopez $89,800 to $98,900. She little insulation, and two 32-117-23-21-0004 to oppose her lncrease in valuatlon from stated that the house was built in 1877, has third basement of Boulders and cement. Stover moved, seconded by Gagne, to reduce the valuation from $98,900 to $93,400 (Land - $28,900 - Bldg - $64,500) Motion carried - 5 ayes. ~ Robert Rascop . ~560=Enchanted Point 30-117-23-33-0034 . I Mayor Rascop stepped down from the Board of Reveiw to inquire about 1\ reductions in valuation due to the use of the pour-in from insulation. Erickson indicated that he would need additional \ information to determlne if his insulation would qualify for the 9% l\deValuation. Rascop filed his complaint with the local Board of ,Review. Haugen directed him to continue to the County Board of Review. ADJOURNMENT OF THE LOCAL BOARD OF REVIEW Stover moved, seconded by Gagne, to adjourn the Local Board of Review at 10:05 p.m., Thursday, May 28, 1987. Motion carried - 5 ayes. -3- l'.&.~.l.&.U '-~w May 28, 1987 page four . . EXECUTIVE SESSION The Council held an executive session for the purpose of discussing a personal. matter. ====- BRENTRIDGE RECONSIDERATION A request has been received from Dave Johnson, the new developer on the Brentridse subdivisIon. Rascop moved, seconded by Haugen, to reconsider and refer Mr. Johnson to the Planni.ng Corr,nnSSlon on June 16, 1987. Hotlon carrled - 5 ayes. ADJOURNMENT Haugen moved, seconded by Session and actlon meeting Motion carried - 5 ayes. Gagne, to adJourn the CounCil Executive at 11:20 p.m., Thursday, May 28, 1987. Robert Rascop Nayo r Sandra L. Kennelly CMC City Clerk SLK/sl.q -4- REGULAR COUNCIL MEET. MO~AY, JUNE 8, 1987 - - --- - 575~UNTRY CLUB ROAD 7:3dW'.M. M I NUT E S CALL TO ORDER The Regular Councll. Meeting of the Shorewood City Councll was called to order at 7:30 p.m., Monday, June 8, 1987, in the Councll Chambers by Mayor Rascop. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE AND PRAYER Mayor Rascop opened the Regular Council Meeting with the Pledge of Allegiance and a Prayer. ROLL CALL Present: Mayor Rascop, Councilmernbers Brancel, Haugen, Stover, and Gagne. Staff Attorney Froberg, Englneer Norton, Administrator Vogt, Planner Nlelsen and Clerk Kennelly. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Gagne moved, seconded by Brancel/ to approve the minutes of May 26, 1987 as affiended - 5 ayes. AMENDED AGENDA Planner Nielsen lnformed the Council that ltem #7 has been removed from the agenda at the applicant's request. PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT Stover referred to the P~anning Commlssion draft minutes of June 2 within the Council packets. She will address each lssue as they are discussed on the agenda. PARK COMMISSION REPORT Commissloner Gordon Chrlstensen reported on the last Park Commission meeting. The Commisslon met in Freeman Park. They discussed the pipe area, fill and type of flll. A letter has been sent to the property owner directly across fr'om the Eureka Road entrance asking for comment regarding the entrance location. No response has been received from them to date. Administrator Vogt will obtain an agreement with MnDOT to install entrance signs on the Hlghway 7 road right-of-way. A request track 1n have to insurance to use exchange have an coverage. the BMX tract has been received. He will repair the for the use of the tract for 10 races. He will also agreement in advance regarding deposit, clean u~ and -1- /{j-. M.ll.'4 U'.l' ~O) JUNE 8, 1987 page two . . PARK COMMISSION REPORT - cont. Brancel moved, seconded by Haugen, to approve the use of the BMX Track subject to Park Commlssion recommendation. Mot~on carried - 5 ayes. Brancel moved, secQnded by Haugen, to approve the bld by Plehal Blacktopping for a 2" mat on the basketball court at Cathcart Park tor $1,570.00. Motion carr~ed - 5 ayes. Gagne moved, seconded by Brancel, to approve the expendltures for a survey to locate the Freeman Park entrance setbacks off ot Eureka Road. Motion carried - 5 ayes. 7: 45 PUBLIC HEARING..... ---- ~ If~~~~ci~~t.stf.fijfVacia~~~~z Rev ised P reliminar. ~ RESOLUTION NO 70-87 Rascop opened the PubllC Hear~ng at 7:45 p.m. to receIve publlC comment on the proposed street vacat:l.On. After calling for comments and receiving none, Rascop closed the public portion of the hearlng at 7:47 p.m. Haugen moved, seconded by Gagne, to approve the presented subject to the Planner1s recommendation. her MotIon, second agreed. preliminary plat as Haugen then withdrew Haugen moved to instruct the City Attorney to prepare a Resolutlon of vacation and return it to the Council for actlon. Motlon carr led by Roll Call Vote - 5 ayes. Haugen moved, seconded by Brancel, to submitted subJect to the conditions of Motion carr~ed by Roll Call Vote - 5 ayes. approve the Prelim~nary PLat as the Planner's recommendations. SHOREWOOD OAKS AWARD SALE OF TEMPORARY BONDS RESOLUTION NO 71-87 Jerry Shannon of Springsted, Inc. revlewed the bond sale bids received at hLs offlce at noon on June 8, 1987. He recommended that the bond be lssued to Cronin & Company, Inc/Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc. as the low bidder at 5.5166%. Assessment rate should be set at 8.65%. Gagne moved, Company for ayes. seconded by Stover, to award bond as recommended to Cronin & the Shorewood Oaks project improvements by Roll Call Vote - 5 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - SIGNAGE PLAN SHOREWOOD SHOPPING CENTER RESOLUTION NO 72-87 Scott Smlth presented hlS slgnage plan for approval and lssuance of a Condition Use Permlt. The purpose of this plan is to uniform the signage on the Shopping Center. The larger anchored store signs will remaln the same until such time as they may request a change. Haugen moved, seconded by Gagne, to approve the signage plan and grant the Conditional Use Permit as recommended by staff. Motion carried by Roll Call Vote - 5 ayes. -2- JUNE 8, 1987 page three . . SETBACK VARIANCE - 5705 EUREKA ROAD RESOLUTION NO 73-87 Jerry Eizea of a new garage. that he wil~ be driveway and move along Eureka Road. 5705 Eureka Road has requested a setback variance to build The lot IS extremely non-conforming and has an old shed removIng. Nielsen has recommended that he abandon one the garage to maintain a 10' setback to the side line Stover moved, by the P.ianner. seconded by Brancel, to approve the request as recommended MotIon carrIed by Roll Call Vote - 5 ayes. SIMPLE SUBDIVISION AND COMBINATION BERG/WILLIAMS RESOLUTION NO 74-87 Berg/Williams of 5160 Shady Island Circle have requested to subdivide theIr current lot by sellIng off 19500 square feet of the property to be combined with the eXIsting iOt to the south east. These new lots will be conforming in size to the R-IB zonIng. Stover moved, seconded by Brancel, to approve the subdivIsion and combination as recommended by the Planner and the Planning Commission. Motion carrIed by Roll Call Vote - 5 ayes. SIMPLE SUBDIVISION AND COMBINATION 5795 GRANT LORENZ ROAD RESOLUTION NO 75-87 Mrs. Sally Larson has requested to subdiVIde and combine a 20' strip of property with the property to the north. This will lessen the noncomformlty of the northern property and leave her with a large conforming lot. Stover moved, seconded by Planner's recommendatIons. Gagne, to recommend approval subJect to the Motion carrIed by Roll Cal~ Vote - 5 ayes. PLANNERS REPORT Swimming Pool Approval - 27780 Island View Road Larry Reid of 27780 Island View Road submitted plans to install a swimming pool, fencing and patio that conform to all zonIng requirements. An amended agreement has been submitted to allow immediate access for the CIty to an easement for a sewer line that will be allowed to install a patio over. Gagne moved, seconded by Haugen, to approve the swimming pool request. Motion carrIed - 5 ayes. Easement Encroachment Agreement RESOLUTION NO 76-87 Haugen moved, seconded by sIgn the Reid encroachment Roll Call Vote - 5 ayes. Gagne, to accept and authorize the Mayor to agreement as modified. Motion carried by -3- JUNE 8, 1987 page four . . PLANNERS REPORT - cont. Swimming Pool Approval - 28130 Boulder Bridge Drive A request to instali a swimm~ng pool at 28130 Boulder Bridge Drive has been received from Steve and Jean Klocksien. The Planner recommends approval only after the pool and a apron are relocated so as not to encroach on the drainage easement and to include the fencing as required by Ordinance. Haugen moved, seconded re~ocated 1n accordance carr1ed - 5 ayes. by Stover, with the to approve the pOOl request as Planner's recommendation. Motion ATTORNEYS REPORT ~xecutive Session Mayor Rascop opened the executive session at 8:30 p.m. to discuss lItigation matters. SessIon was closed at 8:45 p.m. Land Registration - Klodt - Edgewood Road RESOLUTION NO 77-87 Attorney Froberg submItted a Resolution that gives the City easement for the purpose of street use. Gagne moved, seconded by Brancel, to authorize the Mayor and Clerk to enter into, and sign the Qncro~chmept agrp~R~pt. .Motion carried by Roll Call Vote - 5 ayes. ~ ~/I(vY'- ~f>UI(/JJ{/(""-". ~ () (7'. L '\~ (.-'1'-' COUNCIL BREAK - 8:45 - 8:48 P.M. ()trV~~ ENGINEERS REPORT Glen Road/Badger Watermain Report Engineer Norton presented a cost estimate of $156,900.00 to extend the watermain from Badger well to Glen Road. Staff will discuss specifics and assessment POllCY and return with the additional information at a later meeting. Stover asked if this policy would become policy for future assessments. Norton felt that this ~olicy may not apply to other proJect improvements. Street Improvement Proiect - Plan and Specification & Authorize Advertisement for Bids RESOLUTION NO 78-87 Council revIewed the list of streets, type of repairs to each street and costs of improvements proposed for the 1987 street improvement project. They discussed changes and additions to the present list. They looked at adding 4' to West 62nd Street after the MWCC improvement is completed, and added improvements to Beverly and Cajed after the water line and stubs are installed, and removing Enchanted Lane from the project. -4- JUNE 8, 1987 . pag-e five . . ENGINEERS REPORT - cont. Street Improvement Proiect - cont. Haugen moved, seconded by Gagne, to delete Enchanted Lane and include Beverly Drive and CaJed wIth fabric mat and overlay to the 1987 Street ProJect Funds for crossing repaIr would come from Shorewood Oaks ProJect with all addit10nal expenses to corne out of Street Improvement ProJect funds. Motin carl~ed - 5 ayes. Haugen llioved, seconded by Gagne, to approve plans and specifications and author1ze advertisement for bids to be o!:)ened July 8 at 11:30 a.m. Mot1on carried by Rol~ Cal~ Vote - 5 ayes. Status Report on Current Construction PrOlects Shorewood Op~E 70% of the waterrnain has been 1nstalled, a~l drainage tIle IS in and work~ng properly. Nea~___HountaJ.n - Preconsb:uction meetings are set for McKinley Place 3rd and 4th Additions. Staff 1S checkIng on total number of water connectIons to MInnetonka. WCL Acres - Is under construction at thIS time. f.>.fOlects 1n progress: 86-1A - Trunk Watelmain 86-1B - Deep Well 86-1C - Pump House 86-1D - Elevated Tower 86-1E - Trunk Watelmain for Waterford 2nd Addition OFFICE SPACE NEEDS ANALYSIS REPORT Nick Ruehl of EOS Corporation presented a booklet of the City Hall Needs Analysis. Rascop asked if the adjoining house had been considered. Ruehl felt the use of this house would not be functional. Ruehl reviewed the analysis for the Council. The questioned the type of office furniture proposed, location for future staff, electrical needs, fire proof area for downstairs filing and access to lower level. Haugen asked about cost of remodelIng versus new construction. Gagne feels the house should be reviewed prior to any determination being made. Haugen moved, seconded by Stover, to authorize EOS Corporation to obta1n information on the house and submit an architectural opinion on it. Motion carried - 4 ayes to 1 nay - Brancel. Rascop offered determlne method seconded by Gagne. an amendment to author1ze a $420.00 expenditure to of traffic and type of use possible in the house. It was Motion carr~ed 4 ayes - 1 nay - Brancel. -5- JUNE 8, 1987 . page six . . ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT Budget Guidelines - 1988 Vogt will ~resent a formulation for budget~ng and ask the Counc~l to ~ist pr1orit~es for th1s budget. Union Negotiations Vogt will be attend~ng a n~eting on June 10 with a Unlon Arbitrator. Brentridge Dave Johnson W~ll be holding a ne1ghborhood meetlng at CLty Hall on Tuesday, June 9 to present h1s plan for the Brentridge subdivision. MAYORS REPORT Lake Minnetonka Regional Park Board Rascop w11l be on a special board for Regional Parks on Lake Minnetonka. DNR - LMCD Shoreline Ordinances have been changed aga~n. A 20 MPH speed Ilmlt is be1ng ma1ntained for evening hours. "Dry stack1ng" regulat10ns were proposed. $6,500,000.00 was allocated to obtain land, but no condemnation rights were given. COUNCIL REPORTS Vine Hill Road Intersection Counc11 would like to see the pollce patrol that intersect10n due to the many violations. Haugen would like to see the intersection restriped. APPROVAL OF CLAIMS AND ADJOURNMENT Haugen moved, seconded by Brancel, to adjourn the Regular Council Meeting of June 8, 1987, at 11:22 p.m. subject to approval of claims for ~ayment. Motion carl:ied unanimously. General and L1Quor Funds Acct #00-00166-02 General Liquor Checks #050764-050846, (050888) $407,157.43 $31,537.90 Payroll Check List: Checks #201283-201316 ~~5.54 Total $416,052.97 RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, S 2,651.54 $34,189.44 Robert Rascop, Mayor Sandy Kennelly, City Clerk -6- <- CHECK NO 050764 050765 050888 050766 050767 050768 050769 050770 050771 050772 050773 050774 050775 050776 050777 050778 050779 050780 050781 050782 050783 050784 050785 050786 050787 050788 050789 050790 050791 050792 050793 050794 050795 050796 050797 050798 050799 050800 050801 050802 050803 050804 . . GENERAL & LIQUOR FUNDS - BILLS PAID SINCE JUNE 1,1987 (G) (L) (G) (G) (L) (L) (L) (L) (L) (L) (L) (L) (L) (L) (L) (L) (L) (L) (L) (L) (L) (L) (L) (L) (G) (G) (G) (G) (G) (G&L) (G&L) (G) (G) (~) (G) (G) (G) (G) (G) (G) (G) (G) TO WHOM PAID ICMA Retirement Bureau of A1coho1,Tobacco Mary Meyer Henn. Cty. Treas. G & K Services Johnson Bros. Jude Candy Minnegasco NSP Company A T & T Bellboy Corp. Eagle Wine Co. Griggs, Cooper & Co Johnson Bros. Jude Candy Mark VIII Dist. Minn. Suburban Newspapers North Star Ice Pepsi Cola Ed Phillip & Sons Prior Wine Co. Pogreba Dist. Southwest Sub. Publishing Thorpe Dist. Co. D. Vincis Froberg & Penberthy City-County Credit Union Child Support Enforcement ICMA Retirement Corp The Bank Excelsior Commissioner of Revenue A T & T Acro-Minnesota American Linen American National Bank Earl F Anderson Assoc. Asphalt Chaska Parts Curtis Industries Sandra Kennelly Deephaven City Offices Frederick - Sherry AMOUNT PURPOSE $ OS/23/87 Payroll Annual Tax reg. House purchase 6/87 Special Assessments Laundry Service Wine Purchases Cig purchases & Misc. Utilities Utilities Telephone service Liquor purchases Wine Purchases Liquor purchases Wine purchases Cig purchases & misc Beer & soda purchases Advertising Misc purchases Soda purchases Wine purchases Wine purchases Beer & misc purchases Advertising Beer purchases Council dinner Legal fees - May 87 Pros-general 3,993.53 SE Area Water 93.75 Shorewood Oaks 262.50 Eureka Road 112.50 Zoning & Subd 187.50 Ongoing Dev 281.25 06/06/87 Payroll-Credit Union 06/06/87 Payroll-Child sup. 06/06/87 Payro11-ICMA 06/06/87 Payro11-FWS Fica 06/06/87 Payroll-State Telephone service Office supplies Laundry Service Bond payment 7-7-73 No dumping signs Blacktop - Streets Equip. Maint. Public works Nuts & Bolts - Street Clerks conference Street striping Office supplies (1) 515.00 108.00 1,055.00 140.04 39.50 751.77 750.69 187.00 300.55 5.95 4,295.95 307.20 1,475.44 889.74 201. 53 6,257.15 69.12 423.00 529.95 262.74 426.03 4,413.81 230.34 8,779.60 20.00 4,931.03 32.00 145.00 515.00 3,756.40 756.52 20.09 9.50 148.62 5,736.50 453.00 60.28 225.93 55.26 408 . 00 . 424..52 245.82 CHECK NO . . GENERAL & LIQUOR FUNDS - BILLS PAID SINCE JUNE I, 1987 TO WHOM PAID PURPOSE AMOUNT 050805 050806 050807 050808 050809 050810 050811 050812 050813 050814 050815 050816 050817 050818 050819 050820 050821 050822 050823 050824 050825 050826 050827 050828 050829 050830 050831 050832 050833 050834 050835 050836 050837 050838 050839 050840 050841 050842 050843 050844 050845 050846 (G) (G) (G) (G) (G) (G&L) (G) (G) (G) (G) (G) (G) (G) (G) (G) (G) (G) (G) (G) (G) (G) (G) (G) (G) (G) (G) (G) (G) (G) (G) (G) (G) (G) (G) (G) (G) (G) (G) (G) (G) (G) (G) GT Commercial Service ICMA Itasca Equipment Co H.C. mayer & Sons Metropolitan Waste Control Public Employees Retirement Midwest Asphalt Corp. Minnegasco Minnesota Suburban News Minnesota Suburban News Munitech Inc Norwest Bank-Mpls Norwest Bank-Mpls NSP Co. Northwestern Bell Orr-Schelen-Mayeron Judy Quaas Stark Electronics Twin City Striping Village of Tonka Bay Weekly News Inc. Ziegler Inc. Accountemps Inc. Medcenters Health Plan Midwest Asphalt Corp Navarre True Value Loren Kohnen Widmer Inc Bellboy Corp. Coca-Cola Day Distributing Eagle Wine Co. East Side Beverage Co. Griggs, Cooper & Co. Johnson Bros. Whsle Minnesota Bar Supply National Guardian Old Dutch Foods Ed Phillips & Sons Prior Wine Co, Quality Wine & Spirits Royal Crown Beverage Lawn service $ Dues for membership Equipment for Public works Gasoline-Public works Sewer service charges 06/06/87 Payroll Rock - Limestone Utilities-Knightsbridge Employment Ad-City Hall Legal Notices Service maintenance 6/87 Bond payment 7-1-87 Bond payment 7-1-87 City wide electricity Install. & Telephone serv Engineering Fees General 1,069.74 Assessed const 6,246.82 " " 2,003.76 Ongoing Dev. 3,962.37 Zoning & Subd. 812.68 Water 207.56 May cleaning Equipment maintenance Striping NSP power Legal notices Latch-Public works Bookkeeper Temporary Employee Health Tack oil Supplies - City Hall Building inspections SE Area Truck Water Maint Liquor Purchases Pop purchases Beer,pop,misc purchases Wine purchases Beer purchases Liquor purchases Wine purchases Mise purchases Security Alarm Mise purchases Liquor & wine purchases Wine purchases Wine purchases Pop purchases (2) 975.00 224.30 89.00 398.36 19,910.06 1,156.51 43.87 8.43 53.55 116.47 4,175.00 11,189.80 281,564.10 1,030.44 889.23 14,302.93 32.00 27.23 300.00 85.39 91. 52 32.23 910.00 590.10 247.00 113 .44 3,379.62 27,158.09 1,140.79 809.12 3,902.82 333.78 6,774.30 1,776.16 2,013.22 241.98 60.00 101.11 831.58 197.85 912.68 147.70 . . G~NERAL & LIQUOR FUNDS - BILLS PAID SINCE JUNE 1, 1987 CHECK NO TO WHOM PAID PURPOSE AMOUNT SUBTOTAL - GENERAL SUBTOTAL - LIQUOR $ 407,157.43 31,537.90 PAYROLL CHECK LIST 201283 201284 201285 201286 201287 201289 201290 201290 201291 201292 201293 201294 201295 201296 201297 201298 201299 201300 201301 201302 201303 201304 201305 201306 201307 201308 201309 201310 201311 201312 201313 201314 201315 201316 VOID Robert Rascop Janice M Haugen Barbara J Brance1 Robert L Gagne Jr. Kristi Stover Daniel J Vogt Sandra L Kennelly Susan A Niccum She lly L Quaas Evelyn T Beck Jean M Busby Bradley J Nielsen Patricia R Helgesen Charles S Davis Dennis D Johnson Daniel J Randall Howard V Stark Ralph A Weh1e Donald E Zdrazil Russell R Marron Robert F Nash Christophe Schmid Donald Thara1son Ross Nasset John F Thompson John F Josephson William F Josephson Steven D Maeger Dean H Young Joel S Bovee Scott B Bennyhoff VOID Timothy J Stevens TOTAL GENERAL TOTAL LIQUOR VOID .00 Mayor - JUNE '87 Salary 200.00 Council member - June " " 134.82 " " " 147.82 " " " 150.00 " " " 150.00 80.0 Hrs 899.06 80.0 Hrs 699.38 80.0 Hrs 462.31 80.0 Hrs 341. 96 80.0 Hrs 623.71 72.0 Hrs 439.68 80.0 Hrs 805.89 63.15 Hrs 449.35 82.0 Hrs 397.65 80.0 Hrs 581.59 80.0 Hrs 590.51 80.0 Hrs 532.04 80.0 Hrs 491. 71 80.0 Hrs 798.06 80.0 Hrs 486 . 77 38.50 Hrs 186.73 44.50 Hrs 161. 89 9.00 Hrs 45.00 35.0 Hrs 146.69 16.50 Hrs 72.55 16.00 Hrs 70.37 80.0 Hrs 518.75 20.0 Hrs 95.00 80.0 Hrs 486.81 20.50 Hrs 95.81 25.50 Hrs 108.32 VOID .00 37.0 Hrs 176.85 SUBTOTAL - GENERAL 8,895.54 SUBTOTAL - LIQUOR 2,651. 54 416,052.97 34,189.44 (3) . . 'i " . . &tUN 15 1987 oRR .SCHELEN. MAYERoN & ASSOCIATES, INC. Consulting Engineers Land Surveyors Junr 9, 1987 City oi Shor~ood 5755 Country Club Road Shorr~ood, Hinne~ota 55331 Rr : lrunk Watrr Hain, utilitirs, Strrrt Construction Appurtrnant Work Projrct No. 87-1 - Shor~ood Oaks City Council: Enclosrd arr iour (4) copirs oi Construction Paynent Vouchrr No. 1 on thr abovr rrirrrncrd projrct in thr anount oi $ 272569.08. Plrasr nakr paynrnt in anount oi $ 272569.08 to Richard Knutson,lnc., 201 lravrlrrs Trail, Burnsvillr, Hinnrsota 55337 at your earl jest convenIence. Very truly yours, nRR-SCHELEN1NAYERON t.: ASSuClATES liNe. ct-. r 11'~ J~es P. Norton,P.E. Project EnglneH JPN: R60 Enc lo~ure!; cc : Richard Knutson, Inc. /l ,\ L / (/ ......-... / ?n?1 F~c:t /-{pnnpn;n AVpnf/A . Sf/itA ?.?R . MinneafJolis. Minnesota 55413 · 612/331- 8660 ..5/1 Estiiit. Vouch.r HO._____~____~- Dit. Jun. 9, 1987 C~STRUC'TJ~ PAYHEHT VWR ------------------------ For P.riod Ending Hi)' 31, 1987 Proj.ct HUlb.r 87-1 ----------------------------- CI iSS of Work ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Trunk Wat.r Hain, Utiliti.s, Str..t Construction ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- location Appurt.nant Work To : Richird Knutson, Inc. ------------------------------------------------------ 201 Triv.l.rs Trail Shor~ood Oiks Burnsville, Hn. 55337 ------------------------------------------------------ (612) 890-8811 City of Shor~ood, Henn.pin County, Hinn.sota For A. Original Contract Anount ------------------------------------------------------ t J204594.95 B. Totil Additions ------------------------ t 0.00 C. Total O.ductions ------------------------ . 0.00 D. Totil Funds EncUlb.r.d ------------------------ . 1204594.95 E. Total Valu. of Work C.rtifi.d to Oat. t ------------------------- 2869J4.08 F. l.ss R.tain.d P.rc.ntagp ------------------------ 5 I. $ J4345.00 6. less Total Pr.vious Pa~.nts ------------ ------------------------ $ H. Approv.d for Pa~.nt, This R.port ------------------------ t 272569.08 I. Total Pa~.nts Including This Vouch.r ------------------------ $ 272569.08 J. Balanc. Carried Fo~ard ------------------------- $ 932025.87 APPR~LS ------------------------- =- ORR-SCHElEN1HAYERON & ASSOCIATES, INC. -------------------------------------- Pursuant to our ii.ld obs.rvation, as p.rfONl.d in accordanc. ~ith our contract, ~. h.reby certify that the mat.rials are satisiactory and the ~ork prop.rly p.rioNl.d in accordanc. ~ith the plans and sp.ciiications and that the total ~ork is 23 I. cOlpl.t.d as oi Hay 31, 1987 . We h.r.by r'c~.nd pa~.nt of this voucher. ------------------------------- . J ~ tJ Slgn.d : ~ i: ~-l1 ---------------------------------------- -- ---------------- ----------------- ---------------- Signed: Construction Obs.rv.r This is to c.rtiiy that to the best oi Ry kn~l.dge, infoNlation, and beli.i, the quantiti.s and valu.s oi ~ork c.rtiii.d h.rein is a fair approxiRat. .stimat. for the p.riod cov.r.d by this voucher. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Con trac tor Richard Knutson, Inc. Sign.d By Dat. : ------------------------------------ ------------------------------------ Ti tl. ------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------- City oi Shorewood Approv.d ior Pa~.nt Vouch.r -----_______________________________ _________________________________________________ Check.d By : Authoriz.d R.pr.sentative ------------------------------------ Oat. Oah Page I of 6 ------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------- 1744.20 Dit. : Jun..! 1987 Contractor: Richard Knutson,lnc. 201 Trauelers Triil Burnsuille, Hn. 55337 (612) 890-8811 Estimat. Vouch.r No. -------------------- --------------------------------- Trunk Wat.r Hain, Utiliti.s, Str..t Construction and Appurt.nint Work Proj.ct No. 87-1 Shor~ood Oaks for the City of Shor~ood, H.nn.pin County, Hinnesota Contract Dit. : Hay 4, 1987 Work Cmp It ttd Work Started Cmplttion Date .: Hay 1987 : July, 1988 Itm No. Item Contrac t Unit Quantity Unit Price Total Price Work Cmpleted This Previous Anount Honth Honth This Honth Total to Date Quantity Total Pric. . ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SCHEDULE "A" - Trunk Wa1er Hiin and Appurtenant Work ------------------------------------------------------------ l) Street Construction and Appurtenant Work 0331.5 Bituminous S~ Cut <Full Depth) L.F. 3700 1.50 5550.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0565.602 Prot.ct Power Pol.s Ea. 3 600.00 1800.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 2101.501 Clearing and Grubbing Ac. 1.3 4500 .00 5850 .00 1 4500.00 1 4500.00 2104.505 Rmou. Bituminous Pavem.nt S.Y. 3000 1.50 4500.00 1000 1500.00 1000 1500.00 2211.501 Aggregite Base Class 5 <lOOt. Crushed) lon 1100 7.75 8525.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 2211.501A Crushed Rock for Driveways Ton 200 10.00 2000.00 96.85 968.50 96.85 968.50 2341.508A Bituminous Driv~ay Replacement Ton 25 60.00 1500.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 2331.508A 12331 Bituminous Bis. Cours. (Incl. Bituminous Hat.riil for Hixture) Ton 600 18.47 11082.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 2341.508A .2341 Wearing Course Hixture (Incl. Bituminous Haterial for Mixture) Ton 300 21.45 6435.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 . 2357.502 Bituminous Haterial for lack Coat Gal. 150 1.25 187.50 0 0.00 0 0.00 2575.501 Roadsid. Seeding ~ith 81ack Dirt and Hulch At. 1.5 600.00 900.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 2575.505 Sodding ~ith 81ack Dirt S.Y. 3000 2.00 6000.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 ------------ ---------- ------------ Total for I tm No. 1 ................................................... 54329.50 . 6968.50 . 6968.50 2) Wat.r Hain Pipe in Place (All Depth Zones) 2611. 2 16" D.I.P. Class 50 L.F. 850 32.75 27837.50 763 24988.25 763 24988.25 2611.2 12" D.I.P. Class 50 L.F. 2070 22.65 46885.50 0 0.00 0 0.00 2611.2 8" D.l.P. Class 52 LF. 3400 17.05 57970.00 835 14236.75 835 14236.75 2611.2 6" D.I.P. Class 52 LF. 150 16.25 2437.50 95 1543.75 95 1543.75 2611.2 1-1/2" Cl.ir Crush.d Limestone Granular Foundition Hat.rial lon 1000 7.35 7350.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 ------------ ---------- ------------ Total for 1 tfll No.2...............,....................... ....... ....t 142480.50 . 40768.75 . 40768.75 Pioe 2 of 6 1744.20 Esti.at. Vouch.r No. Oat. : Junf t, 19B7 Contractor: Richard Knubon,Jnc. 201 Travrlrrs Trail Burnsvillr, Hn. 55337 (612) 890-8811 Trunk Watrr Hain, Utilitifs, Strfrt Construction and Appurtrnant Work ProJrct No. 87-1 Shor~ood Oaks for thr City of Shor~ood, Hrnnrpin County, Hinnrsota Itm No. ItM Con trac t Unit Quantity Unit Pricr Total Pricf Work Ccnplftrd This Pr.vious Amount Honth Honth This Hanth Total to Dab Quantity Total Pric. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- . 3) Valvrs and Boxrs, Fittings and Sprcials 2611.2 12" Buttfrfly Valvfs and Box!s Ea. 3 745.00 2235.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 2611.2 8" Gatf Valvfs and Boxfs Ea. 8 430.00 3440.00 2 860 .00 2 860.00 2611.2 6" 6atr Valvfs and BOXfS Ea. 12 320.00 3840.00 4 1280.00 4 1280.00 2611.2 16" R.talnfr Glands Ea. 10 63.00 630.00 4 252.00 4 252.00 2611.2 12" R!tainfr Glands Ea. 25 35.00 875.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 2611. 2 8" Rrtainrr Glands Ea. SO 13.00 650.00 17 221.00 17 221.00 2611.2 6" R!tainfr Glands Ea. 5 10.00 SO.OO 3 30.00 3 30.00 2611.2 F i tt i ngs lbs. 6000 .95 5700.00 2355 2237.25 2355 2237.25 3760.503 InsulatIon S.F. 1600 2.70 4320.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 ------------ ---------- ------------ Total for Jtm No. 3 ....".'.........,."...........................,.. 21740.00 . 4880.25 . 4880.25 4) Hydrants 2611. 2 Hydrants Ea. 12 1035.00 12420.00 4 4140.00 4 4140.00 2611.2 Hydrant Extfnsions l.F. 5 260.00 1300.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 -----------. ---------- ------------ Total ~or I tfll No.4....... I................,......................,. It 13720.00 . 4140.00 . 4140.00 . 5) Housr S.rvic.s In Placp 2611.2 I" Corporation Cocks Ea. 35 35.00 1225.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 2611. 2 I" Curb Stops and Boxrs Ea. 35 70.00 2450 .00 0 0.00 0 0.00 2611. 2 I" Copppr l.F. 800 13.10 10480.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 ------------ ---------- ------------ Total for It~ No.5 ..... ... ...... ............... ........ ..... ........f 14155.00 . 0.00 . 0.00 Total for Sch.dulp "A" (ItMs 1 thru 5) ................................ 246425.00 . 56757.50 . 56757.50 SCHEDULE "B" - Utiliti!s, Strfft Construction and Appurtfnant Work - Shorfwood Oaks 6) Str.ft Construction and Appurtfnant Work 2101.501 CI.aring and Grubbing Ac. 4500.00 4500.00 .5 2250.00 .5 2250.00 Pag! 3 of 6 1744.20 sti"at~ Vouch~r No. Contractor : Richard Knutson,lnc. -------------------- 201 Trav~l~rs Trail lah . Jun~., 1987 8urnsvill~, Nn. 55337 . ~-------------------------------- (612) 890-8811 runk Wat~r Main, Util ities, Street Construction lnd A,purtenant Work 'rojut No. 87-1 Sh or PIIIood 0 a k s for the :ity of ShorPlllood, H~nn~pin County, Minnesota Work COlIpleted Itm Contract This Pnv i ous Mount Total to Dat~ ~. Itm Unit Ouantity Unit Pric~ Total Pric~ Month Month This Month Quantity Total Price ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 0331.5 S~ in Place BitUllinous (Full Depth) L.F. 1130 1.50 1695.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 2104.505 RPlloue Bitullinous Paument S.Y. 750 1.50 1125.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 2105.501 Connon Excauation C.Y. 35000 2.00 70000.00 15530 31060.00 15530 31060.00 . 2105.521 Granular 80rr~ (l.V.) C.Y. 750 6.50 4875.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 2211.501 Aggr~gate Base Class 5 (1001. Crushed) Ton 7500 7.05 52875.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 2211.501 Aggregate Sub-Bas~ Class 4 Ton 18000 5.00 90000.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 2211.501 Aggregate Shouldering (Class 2) Ton 35 15.45 540.75 0 0.00 0 0.00 2331.50B 12331 BitUllinous Base Course (Incl. Bituninous Mat~rial for Mixture) Ton 3200 18.47 59104.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 2341.508 8itUllinous Wearing Course <Incl. 8it~inous Mat~rial for Mixture) 10n 1600 21.45 34320.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 2357.502 BitUllinous Material for Tack Coat Gal. 900 1.25 1125.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 2506.522 Adjust Fr~e and Ring Castings (MH) Ea. 14 150.00 2100.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 2531.501 Concr~te Curb and Gutter o.Sl9O 0412 L.F. 9600 4.05 38880.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 2575.501 S~,ding WIth Black Dirt and Mulch Ac. 5.3 450.00 2385.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 2575.505 Sodding With Black Oirt S.Y. 3000 2.00 6000.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 3733.501 G'ot~xtil~ Fr~nch Drain (Incl. 1-1/2" Cl~ar Rock and 6" Perforat~d P.V.C.) l.F. 4800 13.35 64080.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 3733.505 6~ot~xtil~ Stabilization Fabric S.Y. 19500 1.00 19500.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 . ------------ ---------- ------------ lotal for ltftlNo. 6.............",................................... 453104.75 t 33310.00 t 33310.00 7) Wat~r Main Pip~ in Plac~ (All Oepth lones) 2611.2 12" D.J.P. Class 50 L.F. 550 19.75 10862.50 0 0.00 0 0.00 2611.2 6" D.I.P. Class 52 L.F. 4800 12.25 58800.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 2611.2 1-1/2" Cl~ar Crushed li"estone Granular Foundation Mahrial (All Utiliti~s) Ton 4000 7.35 29400.00 1579.65 t1610.43 1579.65 11610.43 ------------ ---------- ------------ Total for Itm No.7 I'" .,.. ....... ......... ......., "" .... I.... .....t 99062.50 t t1610.43 t 11610.43 Pag~ 4 of 6 1744 .20 Dati : June., 1987 Contractor: Richard Knutson,lnc. 201 Travelers Trail Burnsville, Hn. 55337 (612) 890-8811 Estiaate Voucher No. --------------------------------- Trunk Water Hain, Utilities, Street Construction and Appurtenant Work Project No. 87-1 Shorrwood Oaks for the City of Shor~ood, Hennepin County, Minnesota It... No. Ib.. Contract Unit Quantity Unit Price Total Price Work Cmp I e ted This Previous Amount Honth Honth This Honth Total to Date Quantity Total Price ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 8) Valves and Boxes, Fittings and Specials 2611.2 12" Butterfly Valves and Boxes Ea. 1 745.00 745.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 2611.2 6" Gate Valves and Boxes Ea. 19 320.00 6080.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 2611.2 12" Retainer Glands Ea. 4 35.00 140.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 2611.2 6" Retainer Glands Ea. 50 10.00 500.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 2611.2 F i Hi ngs Lbs. 3500 .95 3325.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 3760.503 Insu lat ion S.F. 256 2.70 691.20 0 0.00 0 0.00 ------------ ---------- ------------ lotal for Itftl No. 8 ................................................... 11481.20 i 0.00 i 0.00 9) Hydrants 2611.2 Hydr an ts Ea. It 1035.00 11 385.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 2611.2 Hydrant Extensions L.F. 5 260.00 1300.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 ------------ ---------- ------------ Total for It.... No. 9 ................................................... 12685.00 i 0.00 i 0.00 10) - House Services in PLace 2611.2 I" Corporation Cocks Ea. 73 35.00 2555.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 2611.2 1 I Curb Stops and Boxes Ea. 73 105.00 7665.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 2611.2 I" Copper L.F. 2500 8.25 20625.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 ------------ ---------- ------------ Total ior 1 tm No. 10 .................................................$ 30845.00 . 0.00 i 0.00 It) - Sanitary S~er in PLace (All Depth Zones) 2621.2 8" P.V.C. SDR 35 1686 17.35 29252.10 1495 25938.25 1495 25938.25 2621.2 4" P.V.C. Service Pipe 2500 9.10 22750.00 tt6 1055.60 tt6 1055.60 2621.2 8"x 4" P.V.C. Wyes 25 45.00 1125.00 23 1035.00 23 1035.00 ------------ ---------- ------------ Total for ItPII No. 11 ....... ........... ......... ..... ....... ....... .... 53127.10 . 28028.85 i 28028.85 12) - Nanholes in Place 2621.2 Standard Sanitary Se~er Hanholes Ea. 8 1000.00 8000.00 6 6000.00 6 6000.00 2621.2 Excess Hanhole Depth over 8' L.F. 25 58.00 1450.00 14.2 823.60 14.2 823.60 ------------ ---------- ------------ Total ior ]t'IINo. 12 .................................................. 9450.00 i 6823.60 i 6823.60 Pag, 5 of 6 1744.20 . . Estimate Voucher No. Date : June " 1987 Trunk Wat.r Main, Util iti.s, Str..t Construction and Appurtenant Work Project No. 87-1 Shor~ood Oaks for the City of Shor~ood, Henn.pin County, Hinnesota Contractor: Richard Knutson,lnc. 201 Travelers Trail 8urnsvill., Mn. 55337 (612) 890-8811 ...., Itea No. Work Cmp I. ted Contract This Pr.vious Amount Unit Quantity Unit Pric. Total Pric. Month Month This Month Total to Oat. Quantity Total Pric. Itea ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 13) - StONt S~.r In Plac. (All O.pth lon.s) 2621.2 48" R.C.P. Class III l.F. 1260 81.00 102060.00 1117 2621.2 21" R.C.P. Class III l.F. 240 27.60 6624.00 0 2621.2 IS" R.C.P. Class III l.F. 1254 23.25 29155.50 0 2621.2 18" C.M.P. 16 Gag. l.F. 116 17.00 1972 .00 0 2621.2 18" R.C.P. Class III Catch Basin l.ads l.F. 28 26.25 735.00 0 2621.2 15" R.C.P. Class IV Catch 8asin l.ads l.F. 66 24.50 1617.00 0 2621.2 12" R.C.P. Class IV Catch Basin luds L.F. 123 23.30 2865.90 0 2621.2 6" P.V.C. (P.rforated) l.F. 4400 14.00 61600.00 3477 2621.2 6"x 4" P.V.C. Wy.s Ea. 65 40.00 2600.00 44 2621.2 4" P.V.C. S.rvice Pip. l.F. 3200 8.20 26210.00 0 ------------ lot a 1 for 1 t ell No. 13 ...................... I I I . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . f 235469.40 14) - Manholes and Sp.cial Items 2621.2 6'-0" Dia. Hanhol. I 2310.00 2310.00 0 2621.2 Standard Storm S.~.r Manhole 15 950.00 14250.00 9 2621.2 Exc.ss Manhol. D.pth ov.r 8' 20 58.00 1160.00 15.15 2621.2 Catch Basins 13 725.00 9425.00 0 2621.2 Control Structur. and Appurt.nant Work Lump Sum Bid It.m 9-A I 20800.00 20000.00 0 2621.2 48" R.C. Surge BaSin (HnlDOT 52008) I 4000.00 4000.00 0 2621.2 18" C.M.P. Flar.d End S.ction 4 200 .00 800.00 0 2621.2 Erosion Control 500 2.00 1000.00 20 ------------ rotal tor I tell No. J4 ,................................................$ 52945.00 Total for Sch.dule "B" (Jtfti 6 thru 14) ..............................i 958169.95 Grand Total Sch.dul. "A" and "B" ..................................... 1204594.95 Paa. 6 of 6 1744.20 90477 .00 1117 90477 .00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 48678.00 3477 48678.00 1760.00 44 1760.00 0.00 0 0.00 ---------- ------------ . 1~0915.00 . 140915.00 0.00 0 0.00 8550.00 9 8550.00 878.70 15.15 878.70 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 40.00 20 40.00 ---------- ------------ . 9468 . 70 $ 9468.70 i 230156.58 . 230156.58 . 286914.08 . 286914.0B . . - . . . Friday, May 22, 1987 JUN 1 '001 DAN VCGT City Administrator City of Shorewood 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, Minn. 55331 Dear Dan, This letter is in regard to our -;:;hcne conversation of Frida", ~'la'y 22. I am requestir~ a street light be installed at the corner of the service road to hiway 7 just west of the Vine Hill intersection, and our small connecting street (no name); between the Waterford property and Minnesota ~jini Storageo It would seem most logical to put it on the Waterford side, although I'M sure if you decide to O.K. installation, N.S.P. will determine placement. This spot is terribly dark and difficult to see at night which proves to be somewhat dangerous at times. We also, in the summertime have some problems with young people gathering there to drink beer and discard their cans and bottles; which leaves quite a mess for us to clean up every weekend. We are hoping that by having this area well lit, it will solve both problems. Thankyou for your help and attention to this matter. Below you will find signatures from the immediate neighbors. If there is anything else you need from me, let me know. Sinc. erely" i i I i -1<1' ! P4~ Iv'-b~J~:s/v-- Betsy""'Robertson 19580 Shady Hills Road Shore wood , Minn. 55331 ~~j IJ' 'J1- ' /c1x'!?! ti}} JdJ}/ / (:I!IJ;!L' ~ ~> < .' /J 0.L" o..JU.. ~~. /~ ~~- 3-,,6 / t , ~ . ./ lq-j' \) ... \ \ \ 1J1~ \ ,,,0_ j.... -- Lot 29 ~ _ .:-- I 'L~o _ 1...- --- ,..-:..-.- I q ,lI) ~ 1.0 l:'l .' \ f!) ~l :5~~ Let 32 '" ":': ~'-\ 'J ) /pr.O ( s'1) .~ . .... 2~ 40.02 Res,......- .. ,.......... ~ . . L ,,/ . . t' CITY OF SHOREWOOD MAYOR Robert Rascop COUNCI L Jan Haugen Kristi Stover Robert Gagne Barb Brancel ADMINISTRATOR Daniel J, Vogt 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD . SHOREWOOD. MINNESOTA 55331 . (612) 474-3236 MEMORANDUM TO: PLANNING COMMISSION. MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: BRAD NIELSEN DATE: 11 JUNE 1987 RE: DANSER. ERIC - SETBACK VARIANCE/VARIANCE TO INCREASE THE NONCONFORMITY OF A NONCONFORMING STRUCTURE FILE NO.: 405 (87.27) BACKGROUND In late April of this year our office received inquiries as to whether a screen porch being constructed at 21640 Lilac Lane (see Site Location map - Exhibit A. attached) complied with the setback requirements for the area in which it is located. Upon inspection of the property it was found that the porch was being built without a permit and that it was not in compliance with the 50 foot front yard setback requirement for the R-1A zoning district in which it is located. The owner. Mr. Eric Danser. subsequently requested to informally appear before the Planning Commission to see what his chances might be of receiving a variance to leave the structure in its current location. As explained in his letters. dated 6 May and 11 May (see Exhibits Band C. attached). he had hoped to get some reasonable assurance that a variance would be granted before he spent the money for a survey of the property. which is required for variance requests. At the 19 May Planning Commission meeting the Commission advised Mr. Danser that a survey was necessary to make any kind of determination as to whether the variance is reasonable. A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore (b Re: Eric Danser vari~e 11 June 1987 . Mr. Danser has now acquired a survey of his property (Exhibit D. attached). As can be seen. the existing house is 43.6 feet from the Lilac Lane right-of-way. The porch is seven feet closer to the street. a distance of 36.6 feet. The resulting variance being requested is 13.4 feet. Mr. Danser has submitted letters (see Exhibits E and F) from the four other Shorewood residents along Lilac Lane. stating that they have no objection to Mr. Danser's porch. Exhibit G contains additional information provided by the applicant. ANALYSIS/RECOMMENDATION Section 200.05 Subd. 2b. of the Shorewood Zoning Ordinance provides criteria for granting variances. Upon review of these criteria. the applicant's request does not appear justified. 1. Although the applicant mentions drainage problems. these are not considered peculiar or unique to the subject property. Such problems are commonly resolved by installation of gutters. site grading and landscaping. draintiling and waterproofing. The applicant has not suggested that economics are the justification for the variance. 2. Although Shorewood has numerous nonconforming structures. the City has established a fairly consistent pattern of not allowing nonconformities to be increased. For examples. refer to past decisions regarding requests by Gullifer. Jabs. Sanders. Setterholm and Burger King. 3. The applicant states that he was unaware of the need for a building permit. While he undoubtedly did not intend to violate the City's regulations. ignorance of the laws are not justification for breaking them. In no way should the fact that the work has been half completed be considered as justification for granting a variance. 4. The City should be concerned about the precedent which would be established by granting the variance - not only from the perspective of zoning standards. but also from the standpoint of the building permit process. While we have no reason to question the innocence of Mr. Danser's mistake. we are extremely concerned that others with substandard structures may see this variance as a signal to build what they want without a permit and. if caught, request a variance, pay the double building permit fee and expect to be treated the same as Mr. Danser. Much of Mr. Danser's case has to do with the requirements for property in Chanhassen. Given the extent of boundaries Shorewood shares with other communities. granting variances based on the requirements of other cities, may not be a desirable precedent. If the request is considered reasonable. the City should consider either changing the setback requirement for the R-IA district or rezoning the area in question to R~lC. - 2 - Re: Eric Danser varia~ 11 June 1987 . Finally, there is one basic test for variances which the City has consistently considered. If the addition can be accommodated without a variance, it is typically not justified. Mr. Danser's lot is larger than the minimum lot size for the R-IA zoning district. Despite Mr. Danser's concern for aesthetics there is ample room at the rear of the house to build a screen porch. Based upon the preceding the ~ariance request is not considered justified. It is suggested that the applicant be directed to rebuild the porch within the buildable area of the lot. BJN:ph cc: Dan Vogt Glenn Froberg Eric Danser - 3 - m '. ~ (57 AUIANS SAY J t ~ort 1\ ... ,~ IT 6" 6cu-t ~it, Exhibit A SITE LOCATION Danser variance request n . MAt6, 1987 ,I , Dear Building Inspector, Planning Commission ~embers, and Members of Shorewood City Council, My hppe in composing this letter is to p~rsuade you to grant a variance for my house in order that I may construct a screened-in-porch over the existing wood deck in the front of my house. My house was built around the turn of the cen- tury and now stands about 49 feet fron Lilac Lane. which runs in front of the house. The outside edge of the, existing deck is 42 feet from the road. By build- ing this screened porch over the deck, it will not be- come any closer to th~ r~d. My wife, Jane, and~just- had our first baby four months ago and we ~ould all love to be able to sit out- side in the evenings this summer without being "eaten alive" by mosquitos. Another reason we: need the porch is to shed water away from the house to keep ~base- ment dry. The third reason is that the soffiting around the house has quite a lot of rotten wood in it from leaking water. I was going to have to rebuild it this summer, but by roofing over the existing deck I can remove the rotting wood and shed the water properly away from the house. All three of these concerns can be addressed and remedied by the proposed porch. I have obtained from all our neighbors along Lilac Lane written and signed letters stating that they have no objections to the proposed porch. Please find them enclosed . . The residents along the North side of Lilac lane are situated in the city of Shorewood, while those on the South side are located in the city of Chanhassen. The front setback requirements for a house in Chanhas- sen is only JO feetfrom the road easement. In Shore- wood, along Lilac Lane, the front setback requirement is 50 feet. It does not seem fair to me that on one side of Lilac Lane a porch such as the one I propose may be built with no problems, yet on my side we may not. . I am willing to pay the variance fee and other fees required in order for permission to be granted. The front of the house really is the only place to add the porch, for aesthetic as well as practical reasons. Every picture we have seen in books and mag- azines of this type of country farmhouse with a gambrel roofline (like our house) has a roofed porch on the Exhibit B APPLICANT'S REQUEST LETTER Dated 6 May 1987 . . (2) ( front gable end of the house. This is traditionally where a porch liKe this should be located. It does not make aesthetic sense to locate it on some other side of the house. We have put a lot of thought and con- sideration for traditional building style into the placement of our porch. 'l fhe practical side of its placement is this, already existing is a wood deck over which a roof can be built. and the front door to the house is also located right there. It would not make sense to cut an opening for a door in a wall on another side of the house and then proceed to build another wood deck over which to build a roof and screen in. Our only desiredis to be able to build a roof over our deck and screen it in. It will enhance the looa of our house and increase the property value. in turn increasing tax revenues for the City of Shore- wood. There is still plenty of fronttyard between our house and Lilac Lane. Please cansider carefully my request for a var- iance. the plans for the porch. and the accompanying literature and grant us a favorable decision. Sincerely. k~~~ " . I\. 11, 1987 ,I Dear Members of the Shorewood Planning Commission, My name is Eric Danser. I live at 21640 Lilac lane in Shorewood. Presently I am experiencing an unpleasant situation stemming from having begun con- struction of a screened porch without first having obtained a building permit. My only defense for be- ginning without a permit is my ignorance. There is already a wood deck existing along the front of my house. Ky thoughts were to merely build a roof over the deck and screen it in. I tied into the soffiting in the front of the house which extends 20 inches from the face of the house and extended it another 6 fee~. I honestly did not think a permit was required. I started work on the project on April 25. On April 28 Brad Nielsen's Assistant, Joe, dropped by my house and told me to stop construction until a per- mit was obtained. I stopped constuction on the pro- ject as instucted and called up Brad to see what this was all about. This is when A whole "bucket of worms" began to unravel. Yes indeed, I did need a permit! Plus, a double permit fee would be assessed. He also said I would have to apply for a variance before a permit would be issued, since my house is a non-conforming structure. To apply for a variance I would also need to have a survey of my property done, since all I have is a legal description of the property on my deed. the variance fee is $125 and the cheapest survey cost we could find was about $500. This comes to about $625 just to find out if we could p1'iet a variande- which did not look too promising since I had already started without a permit. My other option was to tear it down. I feel terrible about the whole situationl I was not trying to do something illegal or dishonest. Brad, who I know is onl~ carriing out his job, made me feel like I had done an unforgiveable act and was going to have to pay dearly for it. The porch is still only half built and I haven't pounded in one morenail since told to stop. It is con- st~ucted very well and easily meets code requirements. I am petitioning you at this meeting tonight to just listen to my side of this unfortunate incident and guide; me in the decisions that must be made. I am very sorry for having started this pro~ect on the wrong foot. Sincerely, ~.~'~~ Exhibit C APPLICANT'S REQUEST LETTER Dated 11 May 1987 CERfltFICATE OF SU.EY Prepared for: J. Eric Danser ..- _..J~O.8"- -- I -.. -..- ( I I I I I '- ...,.' -;' , -)-~ I ...J ,_' -J \J\ \J\ N '-9 I.r\ \{\ N 9&(.'4. ....',\ ~ I ,,' rfI +1 I '"I I Ir-: \; I ~ ~:of I ,: '3>. . ~. , r ." J LILAC "1~O.8"- LANE .' I'~.,.,,; ~ IBi/,mf",". nxJ? " _L t Soufh line - o-r fhe NW'/4- of Set. 3,,-7: I/"1; R. 23 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 133, AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NUMBER 120, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin Minnesota GENERAL NOTES o Denotes iron monument . +" Denotes cross chiseled in concrete 't 939.7 Denotes existing spot elevation 19391 Denotes proposed spot elevation ( Denotes surface drainage Dashed contour lines denotes proposed features Sol i d contour I ines denotes existing features Proposed top of foundation elevation = Proposed basement floor elevation = Proposed garage floor elevation = BENCH MAR K: 2340 Daniels Street Long Lake, Minnesota 55356 Ph: 475-1433 I hereby certi fy tho t this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I om 0 duly Reoistered Land Surveyor under the lows of the State of Minnesota, BOOK @~ A -r ~hibit D r/z 2/87 PROPERTY SURVEY DATE ? REG, NO.. SCALE , ,\ -= 40 I ALL - METRO LAND SURVEYORS PAGE :.,. .' . &.a. CL I'hu..~~ ~ f)CI-c.1 :J ~~~ d~ t/tJ~ ....~ ~ ~ ~,Q '!;; ~ ~~.~~~~~~ .. '. ~cw,V3~~u. ~ q/ \q~1 '1 . {\s d \'-~. ~ ~ 'osr of- --.:::B Y\ ~ .I ~,' dV'd ~(lC- ~Vb-e.-y we 'h8-V~ J I{\..t) D\o jec--\-L~s 1-0 ~civ WL\cl.'~ ~ 5cvCe.~eJ ~<5YCh ~.. ~ ~ -fvD~ DT -tV'\e.l 'f I -'00 ()~ e- . 7JN~ ~d?J. Exhibit E NEIGHBOR'S RESPONSE LETTERS p . . .15 '1AJ?r(~/k'L- g E;2,c- I ~Jc; · U V.J~' J ;!,4vE ,f./<J ~ JrTJ?U)....) '7lJ .TjI-?' ,';0:.') :70 S' E-,) .tJt7)ZL-r.L 07J 7rfE- r=;ZV>vl AJY:::~~d-vs ~~. "E, r.unu.:~ 11/f t~~;Jb~L/JyC-E A-,Ni) j)[;-t~;J7 /I ~ff ~'L -rv j~ [' TzJ'o t!. Lt ( },C- To 1lrH- S'~'Z-~~. r1i//vL- !I )1'\.1 ') i I Cj 1 7 . d~J~~ ~a....-~I, .~ . ~~-~~ ~ ~ . ^~t~ ~~a.b~ \ ~1~~' B~~ . ~J71~~~C/~~ ~ ,'>>(A--L ~- S 3 ~ ( Exhibit F NEIGHBOR'S RESPONSE LETTERS . . J\JtJE...4. \9~f Dn\E_J'L ~D~ -G:>NFO'O-M \T \E::..S AI...Dt0G- L\LAL L"""j E::.. \) ~h ct ~~(Lf\) I ~ \-\ AJL-r M ~t0'~ \-\DU SE:.. HA. 5 0 tW L Y A ~4 FT. FI1..OI\r-r S€:.Tci\Ck:.. 2) \'V\f.\fLC- ~ LINt~ SU'I/\c..ox IS LOT S\""2..e. Too St\lH\LL (1l.s~u..pX Ibch.lJ\~,,-:'2.9, 'SlS~v..) * ~) Sf\(\\ ~ ~/;\IL'\ :I~f0t.. SlfJ\COX.\ lo, S\"2f:.. Too S(VH\LL ( 20SuJ\~t..x. ns tEf.J.>:: 35,815 s'b fW ~ +) SCO"l""l ~ ~ULlC:. S\V'I\COY- 's LOT 51?..€:. -reo Sfld.\LL (~o~ VJI1:k), (OoL~p:: 30 I 500 ~\i:-) ~ "* R--\/l.. 2.ot-J\~C::rQ...eG;lL)IQ.€;.S LOT S\~ OF'" A., LE:..A~, 40,000 SQ.~\. A(LGlJlV\~WT~ I~ fA\JOQ. OF G-R-f\(vT\,\JG- DI\{\j~t..rL \JAtz..U~'JJ.C-E:.. \) SO UTt-\ S. \ D.€;. Of=" L\ LJ\ C- LA tU Go. l S c..\-\ "-'01-\ ASS€;.t~. Pe..o pcS~\ \L~ It-\ E.. QE::.. A. rue_ 20 l\J €.. D 'R...S..F. 1\ fIj ~ S eTBA-CoIL ~QDM L\LAc....lru. \ s 3 () FT.. 2) OUT OF \\-\E:.. l4- 2010\ tJG-S I r--.J S+\O~t:..U)oOD I (I t-\ AvE- ~ ~ 5 t=\:- Dt2..-LE.SS FRDr\JT Sb\i3 f\UI::.. ~Qu\(LE:..M6.I\...rrS . TWD ~AV'=- 4-0 FT. SG.TEAc.."....S I v\tJl::l DfUl...'-f \ (R.:1.A..IWI4\C.~\s. t-Alr-J~) \-\AS A SOFT S~T::.BAc..~.. 3) 2-v~f'J \'\lITH \H e AOblTIOtv DF DUlL ?ot2..C...t'\ I OUR.. ~OlJSE:. WIL..L STA t-Jt. 3l F\" 'F"fLDM L\LAc... LA.Nf::., - \-\AfL,M.~tV~ \-\OUSE:... WILL S"T\LL.. tsc.. ~ IT c.. LOS€;..f,-- \"0 L\I_f\C- LA t-..\&.. THAW OL.)(L ~ouSE:... Du fL \-\DUSe WILL STILL. (V\~E..-r \t-\€: 35 \- l-O\L-LE..$S S.ETBAc..~' \LE.Q.lJ\Q..eME..(~T W \-\ \c..\-\- f..X.1 ST S \ W (;.LE:..VE.k:i OF 'FaLJtLT~f~ ) .OR- &D ~o J OF SOO\l..k.- WOO ~ 2(:) t-..),,-.J e:,. en S T Q.. \ c... ..,.... S , 4-) f\L..\ 1-\ OLJ (:..\0-\ S p c:..c:...w L- A..,... \ \/6.. I ~T SE:.E..MS \ f\) ~\J \\A. ~LE:.. \t-\ ~-,-- \t\ E::. \"2-- \ f\ 2oaJ' ~ f2c.~\ l2.C.MUJTS \N I Lt.) JIJ \He.. N E...A Q.... r u \U 12..-E:. J ~ E. c..o M E:.. U 1\..\- R..E:.A.L\STIC nu~ \0 Pof>lJLA"T\ONblZOWT\-\ f\\\J D. ~e..V€..LOP fl\~t0T of St-\O\l..E:;- \DO 0 ci 5 LAN h . C_Ji 1\ (\..,H\-1\, S S L f\..) ~ 1\ So k-E: 2..0 f\.) E:. D ALL t\ 6 fLl c..U L"\ L\ Q.At 2.0tJ-E..~ f\CL.E..A..'S ~t)w TD l2.-E:.S\~E..y\")\IAL '2.of'J\rJ&S , A~~ f\.LL FQD t\)\ S€:..\tsto..c....~s. l t\J Lt-\A-f\JHASSISt..J AfL~ O~L""( 30 FT . 5) I \-\A\J~ \-\A.wt)vJ~\\-t'"E::.l\J~\G rJ~ Lk.."""'l\€:..1L.S Ft'2.DM A..LL WE:..\G \"\ P o(LS (\u::)Y\JC::r L\LA.c....... Lf\~~ \t-1 S\-\O(LE::WOO~ :SIAT\NG- \t\1\T \\-\-~'f J.\~\JE- l)o 0 ~.:::rc.C- \\ c f-.j ~ \0 T\-\ €::.. "PoR..C...\"\ ADa \T \C~ · J Eric Danser 1 612 474 224' Exhibit G '. ~. ~ ~ . APPLICANT'S REQUEST LETTER 21640 Lllac Ln., Excelslor, MN 5533 Dated 4 June 1987 . . ,I . . CITY OF SHOREWOOD MAYOR Robert Rascop COUNCI L Jan Haugen Kristi Stover Robert Gagne Barb Brancel ADMINISTRATOR Daniel J. Vogt 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD . SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 · (612) 474-3236 MEMORANDUM TO: PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: BRAD NIELSEN DATE: 12 JUNE 1987 RE: BRENTRIDGE - RECONSIDERATION FILE NO.: 405 (87.09) As you are aware, Dave Johnson has taken over the proposed Brentridge development from United Mortgage Company. As explained at the last meeting, he requested that the Council delay action on a resolution denying a rezoning and 26-lot preliminary plat until he could put together an alternative plan. He has since held a neighborhood meeting with area residents to discuss the project. Based on that meeting he has submitted a revised plat (see Exhibit A, attached). The new plat shows 24 lots. Two lots have been removed from the west side of the proposed street. The resulting lots now average 26,339 square feet in area. For those of you who may have discarded the original staff report, a copy of the report is enclosed for your review. Relative to the revised plat, the requirement of trail easements is still highly recommended. BJN:ph cc: Dan Vogt Glenn Froberg Jim Norton Dave Johnson City Council A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore 1 PHONE: (612) 884-3882 Shorewood Oaks Development, Inc. 6100 AUTO CLUB ROAD. SUITE 314 . BLOOMINGTON, MN 55438 , June 18, 1987 Mr. Brad Nielson City of Shorewood 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, Minnesota 55331 Dear Brad, Re: Environmental Impact Statement Proposed Brentridge Addition Subject to the approval of our proposed plat it is our intention to deed "Outlot A" to the city. You will noti ce that the rear lot lines do not encroach on the wetlands contained in this outlot. This will e1 iminate the need for a conservation easement to insure preservation of the wet1 and and to protect wi1 d1 ife. This should also eliminate the need for an Environmental Impact Statement. Please ask the council to vote against ordering one. Thank you. Sincerely, ~.'\ C.U.... " ..,,'J"'" -",/ David A. Johnson President \ \ , ..J ~H I o' . J I 1/; , I : o ., I I', . I I I : II ! J I,()~o' I, 0. ,.,. 'It iIt: .Outlot A Jt \ \ " WETLAND ll.: \(,. ,t." f\"'v~ .IIC ;1- c, ~ \Ji 2/ '- "- c __ .', ((--'-~- . '-, I . , ... I' - -Z'~. ::; /! _.; ~\ ....... . I,' 1,\,,- .. 0 / / 'I ?F.,050 1\ 'I II . i ", ,/ - 100' v-- 200' . b . t A LAT Exh~ ~ PRELIMINARY P REVISED I 400' . Shorewood Oaks Development, Inc. 6100 AUTO CLUB ROAD. SUITE 314 . BLOOMINGTON. MN 55438 . PHONE: (612) 884-3882 May 28, 1987 t~r. Dan Vogt City of Shorewood 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, Minnesota 55331 Dear Dan, Re: Brentridge Subdivision Approval It was obvious from the comments made by members of the council and from Brad that I will be appearing before the Planning Commission with the Brentridge project before the council will grant approval. If that's the case then there is no point in my appearing at the council meeting on June 8th. The conflict with my dialysis can be avoided, plus we can get the project approved properly if we follow the following schedule: 1. Please ask the council to delay action on the findings of fact resolution until the meeting on June 22nd. 2. Schedule my appearance on the Planning Commission agenda prior to June 22nd. 3. Place project on agenda for council on June 22nd. 4. Schedule a neighborhood meeting on a Tuesday or Thursday evening prior to the Planning Commission meeting. This should give Brad plenty of time to notify the neighbors of the above schedule. It will also give me an opportunity to find out the concerns of the neighbors and to properly address them. I understand that there were more things than just the density that they were questioning. I am a reasonable person and quite willing to discuss reasonable and logical objections to find the proper solution. . Thank you for your consi deration. ~~ David A. Johnson President cc: Brad Nielson ~ Exhibit B . . CITY OF SHOREWOOD MAYOA Robert Rascop COUNCIL Jan Haugen Kristi Stover Robert Gagne Barb Brancel ADMINISTRA TOR Daniel J. Vagt 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD . SHOREWOOD. MINNESOTA 55331 · (612) 474-3236 June 1, 1987 NOTICE TO RESIDENTS Subject: Zoning Ordinance Amendment Request Proposed Brentridge Subdivision At its regularly scheduled meeting held on Tuesday, May 26, 1987, the Shorewood City Council voted unanimously to reconsider the application for an amendment to the Shorewood Zoning Ordinance which was submitted by United Mortgage Corporation. The City Council further determined to refer the matter to the Shorewood Planning Commission. Such consideration by the Planning Com- mission will take place at their meeting to be held on Tuesday, June 16, 1987. Inasmuch as you have previously been notified of this proposal, we are informing you that this matter will be discussed by the Shorewood Planning Commission on the abovementioned date at which time the Commission will hear comments. If you wish to comment, you may do so by appearing before the Planning Com- mission on June 16. Written Comments will also be accepted. The Developer has indicated that he will hold a neighborhood meeting to solicit input prior to the June 16 Planning Commission meeting. By order of the Shorewood City Council. Daniel J. Vogt City Administrator cc: Glenn Froberg /" Brad Nielsen v Jim Norton Dave Johnson Patti Helgesen-- Planning Commission Exhibit C A Rp.~idpntial Comml/nitv on Lake Minnetonka's .f)ollth Shore . . ~ Sh~.~e~~2_~~Q_~ks Qevelopment, In~~____~ _ - ----,------- -'--'~---"--'--"---'~------'----~----"_."'-'----------- . -----_._~-- 6100 AUTO CLUB ROAD. SUITE 314 . BLOOMINGTON. MN 55438 PHONE: (612) 884~3882 June 10, 1987 . Mr. Brad Nielson City of Shorewood 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, Minnesota 55331 Re: Neighborhood Meeting Srentridge Addition June 9, 1987 at 7:30 p.m. The meeting was held at city hall with the following people in at tendance: Dear Brad, Myself and Craig Johnson - Representing Shorewood Oaks Development, Inc. Eileen Gallagher - Owner of property to be developed Mr. & Mrs. R. N. Thompson Susan Rosol Sano ,~. S. & K. A. Gabby Mr. & Mrs. Wm. W. Anderson Jr. Peter A. Holmberg Mr. & Mrs. Charles T. Christian - adjacent neighbors Ed Cembrycki - non adjacent n.eighbors After much discussion the meeting broke up after 10:00 p.m. The consensus of opinion was that I would: 1. Reduce the density from 26 to 24 by removing 2 lots from the west side of the street. 2. Remove some trees from the Shorewood Oaks subdivision and replant them near the westerly lot lines adjacent to the Howards Point property owners. (4 - 6 per lot) 3. Have declaration of residential covenants,conditions and restrictions to be recorded with the. 91at,. The neighbors will then support my proposed plan. This should enable me to get the support of the city staff, the planning commission, and the city council, resulting in plat approval. Thank you for your consideration and support. ~elY, L-f;/~ Davi d A. Johnson Pres i den t cc: Eileen Gallagher Go rdy Kl emp Exhibit D . . Shorewood Oaks Development, Inc. 6100 AUTO CLUB ROAD. SUITE 314 . BLOOMINGTON, MN 55438 PHONE: (612) 884-3882 June 17, 1987 Mr. Dan Vogt City of Shorewood 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, Minnesota 55331 Dear Dan, Re: Proposed Brentridge Addition Would you please forward a copy of this letter to the Mayor and all the members of the council? As you know I have taken an assignment of United !40rtgage Corporation's interest in this project. They were unable to get plat approval based on a 26 lot density. (average size 24,313 square feet). I was aware of this problem even though I felt that the plan was good and the density should be acceptable at this level. Everyone that I talked to seemed to think that if United Mortgage Corporation had been willing to decrease the number of lots by 2, to 24, the project woul d have been acceptable. When I took over it was pretty clear that I wouldn't get 26 lots approved. I proceeded to hold a neighborhood meeting (refer to letter dated June 10, 1987) at which time I started with the original 26 lot proposal and let them beat me into submission on coming back with a plan eliminating 2 lots on the west side of the street. For this they agreed to support me at the planning and council meetings. I started with 26 lots because I knew if I went in with 24 they would want 22 and so forth. For a perfect example of that type of thinking one had only to listen to Susan Sano at last night's planning commission meeting. Of all the people in attendance at the neighborhood meeting that \'Jere going to support me, only Mr. & Mrs. Gabby voiced their support last night. The rest either didn't come, were silent or pushed for a further reduction. The arguments for a decrease in density below 24 lots (average size 26,339 square feet) does not have merit. The marshland to the east cannot be calculated into the average lot size although its existence is certainly a factor in considering a zoning change to R-l-C that would allow approval for the proposed plat. When the people involved in the decision making process for establishing a comprehensive guide plan for the future development of the city were considering this issue they arrived at their conclusions based on logic. They were not confronted with the emotional issues that are prevalent at a time like this. There were no pleas from neighbors about to lose the physical and visual benefits that they had enjoyed by having undeveloped open land available for their use at no expense to them. Page 2 - letter ~ June 17, 1987 to Dan Vogt - ~ of Shorewood There were no landowners that would be harmed by an inability to sell their property even at a break even price if the plat is not approved. There was also no developers around complaining about the fact that a density of 26 or 24 lots was barely acceptable economically. Their conclusions were based solely on what they felt would be good for the entire city in the long run. They had to consider the fact that there were already 8 lots along Howards Point Road adjacent to this property with an average lot size of 24,377 square feet. Let me quote from your comprehensive guide plan: W'-. .:- , - ~ ~ J ~ I ~ DISTRICT 2 This District is bounded by the Shorewood/Chanhassen border and Smithtown Road on the south, lake Minne- tonka on the west and north, and the large wetland area just east of Howard's Point Road on the east. The area is currently zoned for acre sized lots, but contains many lots half an acre in size. A commercial marina is operated on Howard's Point Road in the northern .portion of the District. Nearly the entire eastern edge of the District consists of one of Shorewood's largest wetland areas. Proposed land use for this District is mainly semirural residential west of Howard's Point Road. The area between Howard's Point Road and the wetland area to the east i$ proposed forlow density residential (one to two units per acre). This is easily justified due to the area's proximity to Smithtown Road - a collector, and the number of existing half acre lots in the area. Also, the existence of the wet- lands to the east will still maintain an overall density of less than two units per acre. The Shorewood Long-Range Parks Plan has identified a multi-purpose trail around the large wetland w hi ch borders this D istri ct on the east. If, upon re-evaluating the Parks Plan, the City decides that this is a desirable element of Shorewood's park system, all development requests received for the area should include dedicotion of necessary easements for trails. Page 3 - let~ated June 17, 1987 to Dan vo~ City of Shorewood Please note the fact that this use would be in the best interest of the city for the reasons stated above. Additionally you have the increase in the tax base, and the user fees from city sewer and water that will help maintain and support existing expenses. This plan would also provide 24 more homes to support the city when the problems of a comolete city water system are addressed. This plan will also provide one more upgraded street to serve city residents. This guide plan clearly indicates that my proposed plan fits exactly with what was intended for this area. Please use this fact as justification for approval rather than bowing to the increased demands of the neighbors. I need a response from the council approving the plat as proposed. (from the 26 lot original down to 24 by removing 2 lots from the west side of the street). I will also submit a copy of a 24 lot plan with 1 lot each removed from east and west sides of the street. This would permit a trail easement along the marsh as recommended by your planner, Brad Nielson. Either plat is acceptable to me. There is a third possible plan that I will produce a copy of. This would be 23 lots by taking 2 from the west and 1 from the east. I don't feel that this would be fair but I need an approved plat by Monday night. This plan would require rr~ to negotiate a reduction in my land purchase price. Please see your way clear to approve the first 24 lot plan. I thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, David A. Johnson Pres i dent cc: Gordy Klemp Eileen Gallagher Ray Brandt . . MEMORA~'DUH TO: . . MAYOR Robert Rascop COUNCI L Jan Haugen Kristi Stover Robert Gagne Barb Brancel ADMINISTRATOR Daniel J. Vogt CITY ()f SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD. SHOREWOOD, MII'JNESOTA 55331 · (612) 474-3236 ~~YOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: BRAD NIELSEN l7y DATE: 18 JUNE 1987 RE: TOWNE ADDITION - FINAL PLAT FILE NO.: 405 (87.14) Mr. William Ecoff has submitted a final plat for his proposed Towne Addition (see Exhibit A. attached). As can be seen the plat still shows 10 lots. You may recall that he earlier proposed to revise his preliminary plat to nine lots. intending for the existing house to have more area than the other lots. Since he wishes to leave the option open to redivide the larger lot in the future. he has shown it as two platted lots. which he will legally combine until such time as he wishes to sell it. From a planning perspective. this approach is advocated because it will simplify a redivision later. Although it will need to be processed as a simple subdivision at some future date. the resulting lots will have lot and block legal descriptions rather than metes and boundS descriptions. The proposed grading plan shows an existing garage on Lot 3 which did not appear on the preliminary plat. Since the garage is located too close to the proposed right-of-way. it should be required to be removed. If the applicant wishes to move it into compliance with the setback requirements. he must apply for a conditional use permit to have two garage structures and to exceed 1000 square feet in accessory space. Preliminary grading. drainage and utility plans have been referred to the City Engineer for review. He advises us that based upon information received to date. the plans are acceptable. He has indicated that the road in one location is too flat and suggests moving the high point of the road northward to achieve a minimum of .75% slope. He also needs detailed plans and specifications for the street and utilities. The applicant's engineer must also provide his calculations for stormwater runoff for verfication that the pond is properly sized. The plat must be revised to provide a drainage easement over the ponding area. A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore ? Re: Towne Addn. Fina~lat 18 June 1987 . Once the detailed plans and specifications are approved. the applicant's engineer must provide cost estimates for the required improvements. from which the amount of a letter of credit can be determined. Park dedication fees must be paid prior to release of the final plat. If Lots 2 and 3 are to be combined. the amount owing is $4000. If they are not combined. the amount is $4500. Prior to release of the final plat. the applicant must provide an up-to-date (within 30 days) title opinion for review by the City Attorney. The applicant must also advise the City Clerk as to how he wants to pay sewer equalization charges on the new lots. It is recommended that the final plat be approved subject to the applicant entering into Shorewood's standard development agreement. incorporating the recommendations contained herein. BJN:ph cc: Dan Vogt Glenn Froberg Jim Norton William Ecoff Claire Towne - 2 - . . AIorlhw~~1 ,"orner / 0/ /h~ SOW y" 0-/ Ik AlE~o, 5'~c~o/? .is. 7 I ~I 't:1 'c I N i I~ i~ 5 '- ",> 'S , , ' .....fl " -~ "- !..."'\ ,), I)..... "J ......) ~ ') '<:l ..... \f) / /\ 1\ \ IJ v '-"'8-;;0;- ~. ." .\ "~ ~". .~. , __.1- ~. I u I I o '" <[ Ii: 0 ~ \~ "- ~I) ""'~ S( I~~ \ , " S~ ~~ '", ~f ~ ' ." :}:,~ ~ ~~ ~ ~. :-; '\)~\~ lit, '-..J Scale in , .0 25 50 BEARINGS SHOWN ARE ON AN i DRAINAGE AND UTIL\1 ARE SHOW THUS' - ~ '" ~ , ~ ~ ~, ~ . -y1L BEING 10 FEET I N WI D LOT LINES AND 10 FE ADJOINING STREET L , ~ o DENOTES IRON MONUMEN REGISTRATiON NO. 9018 l INDICATEC ON THE PLAT. ~ . ,.,~ . . ~/1 I"! ~ ~~ tvr~0- - ,.. If lIt: ,I"/It2LJ/ II/oJ :;...,0 Exhibit A \._- . " j G-- ____ ~;. 1 11)(00 --/ I / / -~ ')5t. '- "- "- " - -- -- '\ \ ) .--./ .........,"...... / , "- "-- -- - -~ .---- (""-:+- _ I" .--'v ~ \ -. .-:-. + ! I J -_/ --- I .. ..:t- ~" '.- .- ~' -'+-.- \ , _.'1- " t- " I " ------ ,\ '" \ \ j ~\ 1\ \ : l ! II 'f i ( { )( I ~ \ \ 1, \ -! r ) C.. \.) __ t.J -., ~~ / ~r/ -~ -------- ----- '- ,/ \ / ( ~ / ~I t" . I : I \. \ ~. \', , \~\, ~. \ \\,",',,- \ \ ~ "~[~:~~~~:~_ O///f~ ~~~ " . . ""'-. " - '.'- / "'-. ;&O~ I l \ \ -..................., -- \ \ / "/ " \. .~ __ ~' ''.'. '8 ::-. uI ";~"\,,,~,;~t \ r~ I-'~ t," '..~,,'\' 1 . ~. ',). ~'/l,;t....J ,.X'l /'l~\ I " ,,=5" '. '~<J II ' (~" \ ,)' ~;' ~._////~,~ ~:;~~,;:J1 '('-~, -,:"~1 " \ " ...J~' ) '/' \"247475' . ",: ,'" \ .' " r.. "- . ~... // //;,/./' ~ \y - .' . ~ ,- ,;: , " \ ......... -, " - " " -- ' '" ,;" ,'" ~"-'. " :-!?\ \ "'.C. "-. -~1 t '~~V ~'\ ___, l ':A:p;"~ \ : <,} ];::'. I ,I J ~ r- 1 -' I~'~ i: ~ ...; / fT'<~' ,~ ,.", : I '.-, '- 'f' ~. - / I~ .,..., !' . (I /_)',i,./ ~. '" : _ ~ 1_-1-- ' :"';1 I. I , 50" , - ! \ : : ; I: : 1.,5'.0':> ( 6." " ' ,,-..,,~ .' u __, ~ /.-- 311.3h'" '-\IT _.- - - -~,.-~ ?-.~ /' ", ". '" ",,, . . ~ "- _ ::f,->/.J.ffi ~ "(tJ vV.!:!..-+ F~ . ~;c;'" ....O,e "'o.~ _--=--- . ~o,,5>" c, . ' "' . _ . _,,' c,,'.--:' ,.,. H. '" ' r,~ ';-- , ' ---'"'~ ~11~.;~,1''''Of;:' -- ~ ~:-- ~ :.---:., - p. ~ . ~" " " "- ~';'~,i-. ,'. " ' ," !~ \ \ ;/\ i~Y> . :-,'1 i ,~~ f) . -=-:-j \. ." -l~Y . - -, -- / -...-1 ------- . I \ , " GR4LJ//Y6 ~r;oP" EO T ^, I" . i 1 r' A ; 2 ': ~;~! 5 ~'1! 'P~'~ ~ Bill f 1130 f M i nne> Te 1. ; '~l 0 T [I!N: Tha No. Eas Nor Wes Nor fee Ii n I 'It?fE-t'. ~f ~~ne~v~ertify ".'~e l~ws lSlon 1 \n~i I of the , ,1 ')B 7. ".: ..~' ~.,~ F'p. . ,-' , . r;/aj ~()TE5: '-and Ar~a !"ninq is s,~ to be frcnt set rilP..,qraph Circled e Lots 5, 6 Water to ~ ;;, [~/5 z.i.J , , \ ~ ~ Exhibit B - - . " . TETON LANE and LILAC LANE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION Chanhassen City Hall 937-1900 6'30 Coulter Dr. Chanhassen, Mn. 55317 Shorewood City Hall 474-3236 5755 Country Club Rd. Shorewood, Mn. 55331 TO: Mayot~ COU)'"IC i 1 Planning Commission Ci t Y Att c..rney City Ma"(,ager Public Safety Ci ty E)'"lg i )'"Ieer Independent Engineer Pub 1 i c WClrks Ci t Y P lannet~ Cha)'"lhasseY"1 Tc,rl1 Hami 1 tCI..... Jay J,:,h'r",so)'"1 Bi 11 BClyt Dale Geviy"g Clat'k Hc,t~""1 Lad d Cc,'r",rad Rc'get' Knut so)'", 00)'"1 Ashwo'rt h J i rn Cast lebert~y Gat'y Wart~e""l Bi 11 E)'"lgelhardt Barbat~a Dacy Shorewl:lf,:.d Robert Rase-op RClbert GagY'le ~T a)'"1 Haugen Kt~ist i Stc,ver Bat~bat~a B'r'ance I o a)'", Vogt V Do)'", Zdt~azil Brad Nielsen SUBJECT: THE FUTURE USE OF TETON LANE and LILAC LANE The Association wishes to cooperate with the appropriate public representatives and governing bodies which provide economically, the safety, service and general environment of their respective CClfrlrnU Y'I i ties. We wish to inform you of our position and reasoning concerning the issue of Teton and Lilac Lanes as discussed at the May 4, 1987 Chanhassen City Council meeting. The issue is complex but we wi I I be br i e f . Ing_~li~~D~i~_~~~~aa_~~~QE~_tD~_Q~QQQ~~~_bQi_l~L ~lQ~~_~L_~D~_~~i~_1~Dg_iQ_~~~yg~_~Q~Di~_~Q~Q_1Z R~Qy~g~E_anQ~t~~_~~l_g~_a~~~L_E~f~~_a~gDt_g~ai= ~D~~E_~D~_~~it~~_~QQ~Q~~D_g~~g~a~_~g_a~QQQ~i_iD~a ~lt~~n~t~y~__Q~QQQa~l__m~g~__~t_tD~_~~~__~tD-~~t~ !;Q~D~~l_m~~t~ng:.. 1/ . . BACKGROUND The developer has proposed an 81 home development on tne 56 acre site, tCI be kYtclwYI as "Cut'ry Farms", a.nd has received prelimiYlary approval of a portion of that plan. The developer has purchased an option on a privately owned road known as Teton Lane, and proposes to deed that road, unimproved, to the City of Chanhassen. The City would then improve the road to municipal street standards providing the necessary third access to Curry Fat'ms. The developer has stated to the Planning Commission and the City Council that they will not contribute money toward the maintenance or improvement of the road beyond the purchase of the t t~act . The property owners in the general area of Teton and Lilac Lanes have formed the Teton and Lilac Lane Homeowners Association and are concerned for: 1) the safety in the neighborhood, 2) loss of property to right of way, and 3) the associated cost burden for future improvements to Teton and Lilac Lanes. It is our position that a safer, and less costly alternative be constructed by the developet'. ~~fgt~_~2~2i~~c~tiQ~2~_Ibg_~Q~2tc~~tiQ~_Qf_~_~QCtQ~CD_~~~€22_fCQ~ ~Q~~tY-_~Q~Q_1I__i2_2~fgC_tb~D_I~tQ~_~D~_~il~~_~~~~2_fQC_~_D~~Q~C Qf_Cg~2QD2~ 1. Safer sight distances in both dil~ections on COI_lnty Rc.ad 17 than offered by Lilac Lane. 2. Better approach grades than either Lilac or Teton of which would require major adjustments to correct steep grades and 90 degree intersections that are negotiate in bad weather. Lane, bClt h the exist iYlg difficult tCI 3. Shorter cuI de sac routes. . . ~Dg~~__tn~__Q~~E~ni__Qt~i__Q~QQQE~l~__iQ~__Q~~~lQQ~~_-Q~e~a ~QEQ1~t~1~_DQ_~Q~i_fQ~_~D~_ffi~iDi~Den~~_Q~_i@Q~Q~~ffi~Dia_iQ_I~iQD ~Dg_hil~~_b~D~a~ 1. The City Planning Department Staff directed the developer to incorporate Teton Lane as one of three accesses to the Curry Farms site. The plat presented to the City Council shows that the developer will build the Southern access from Lake Lucy Road, the Eastern access from County Road 17 directly south of the I-<erbel"' prl:.peor't y, but ?b.if:!!.~~LE1.1_~~?Qgn21.QA.1iiY to roa i nt a i 1'1 and / clr improve Teton and Lilac Lanes, as the Northern access route for CLn'ry Farms, iQ_tb.~_~Q~itiD9.__Q~QQ~~t~_'2~D~~E_~mLtb.~_-~iti~~_'2f ~ ~b.~Db.~a~~D_~DQ_~b.Q~~~QQQ. ~ c. The developer presented the purchase of the unimproved Teton LaY"le aY"ld its dedicatierY"I to the City, as a geY"let'ous "GIFT" tl:1 help the City solve the Tetern Lane nuisance problem. The develerper firmly denied any intentierns to make further monetary contributions toward maintenance or future improvement cersts required to create a third municipal street access to Curry Farms. In fact, the developer had tried to purchase only the sc,uthet'n spur of Teton LaY"le. Ol'"lly the southet'most pc,t'tic,n is needed for a crossover to access the northwest acreage of the development. The present owner refused to sell the southern portion alone and insisted that the developer purchase the entire pal"'ce I. By dedication of Teton Lane to the develc'per II-lill: 1) Be exemDt ft'Orll maintenance responsibility, 2) Very for the Curry Farms northern access abutting property owners. City of Chanhassen the any short or long-term effectively shift the cost route to the City and the At the May 4, 1'387 Council questioned whether the dedication was truly a favor to the City of that should be asked again. @.ThedeveIC1Pel"'canCC1nstt'l.lctanC1t,thet'naccess to CUl"'ry Fat'ms ___n9__~9?i__:!!.9__ibg_~iiig?__9r_~g~i:!!.ing_2rQ9gr1Y__9~n~r? This access would cross the developer's Lot 15, Block 3 and property resently owned by the City. This access will be north of a large wooded buffer for the Kerber property and connect to County RClad 17. meeting, Councilmember Geving of an unimproved private road Ch':::\YlhassBY"I. It is a question This alternative would not below standard dedications owners to pay for street developers. set a precident for the City to accept requiring Cities and existing property improvements for the sole benefit of . . Ibg_~2211L_i~QL9~g~gDi_2f_Ig19D_bEDg_i2_~DDg~g2aEL~~ 1. The histol"~ical pl"~I=,blerlls associated with Tetc...... Larle have resulted from traffic generated by the operation of a comercial horse boarding and riding stable which has operated under a conditional use permit granted by the City of Chanhassen. That operation has moved from the site. Traffic over Teton Lane is now diminished by more than 95~ and consists of only the trips made by the seven residents having easements over the road. L:.. Follc'wing the completion clf the Curry Farms develc.pmerrt, (irl approximately c to 4 years>, 6 of 7 property owners with easements over Teton Lane will directly front and be able to use the streets within the Curry Farms development for access to County Road 17 and Lake Lucy Road. Only one property owner will continue to USE a small portion of Teton Lane. IF, AFT~R REVIEWING THE FEASIBILITY STUDY COMMISSIONED BY THE CITY, the City determines that Teton Lane, (and possibly Lilac La'(le) , ._ n' to be :l rllp'r~C'VE~'O, it is the pCls i t i ern of the Tet orl Lane and Lilac Lane Homeowners Association that Ell_g~QgDaga_~2nDg~ig~ ~iib_lb~_~~inign~~~s_2f_Igi2D_bEng~_~DQ_ED~_f~i~Lg_i~2L2~g~gDi_iQ Igi9D__~nQ_bil~~_b~Dg2_iQ__9L2~iQg__Eggg~Eig__D9LibgLD__~~~g2a_i9 ~~LLY___E~~m2L__2b2~lg__gg__gDliLglL__ibg__Lg2QQn2i9iliiY__2f__ibg ~gyg~2Qg~. The development of Curry Farms is the sole reason for any improvement to Teton and Lilac Lanes. Only the developer will make financial gains from improvements through the sale of lot~.; a'(,d homes in the CU~---r-'Y Farrns developrlleY".t. r -:. j L , I T . I I . ~-+ I I I : l i I ; , I ' , ! , I 1; I I I I I : , I I : i I c-+ , , \ I I 1/, ; ,Q \ . ~, ... ~' , , , I I I ! I I I , ~"" '1'- '\J. " ~-~-- /"!.... ~. ,- \ '" ' "\ ---L.:. " , '-4 '1..1;. ''Ct, T.... I I : v X I I I i ! , l t. Y' 1 t\ I I . . I " ,v :.K I . I I V ,.oY I I i I " I, , t~ ---r---r----r I .r.a .'v .),~ ,T " , }., t I," i ...... " .-..... I , I v i ! , , I F:: -" --i-. --+ , \ I .,; ...... 'roi U'" , y" -~ i-- r=;. 1\0.' ~, ,,/'~ J. J J\.\-' i I ; I I .,. i I I I .,. I! I , I I ,~' ," "" r .~ .--t-:=--+--4 -.;-... .... -W- " iiI I r1 , I I I , i i I : 'T 1 i [.,y i , ' I I ,i.- ,'" I 1. I I ; -r-+--+-t- I , : f ~. y -~;-: ------------- -i--7- ___I -- ,)-- ----7 ----- -----~~ --- ---'---:-+ -.t. >-- 'T --+----'- ~ i ---- ~+ ! . ~'~~~~~=~~~:~:~:~~i -i _d_' -~ .~i ~~-rv- .-.--~-~-=--- -1 -- ~~~.--L-.L_' 'J '-/ .":: - --~t . --------- j -------T-~ ,--i ----- K- -- - r... '. ,1~~- -~: ~ ~~__~~__:~ _~~- : ~ .~~ ~~~__. ~~-.- " - ~'-il _~ .-J .:' . . - ~ ' --- --.!' -- -~ 1 ~ - - - -1 --==f-- . ~. - . -.-.-. ~ ----1,-4-'- ~, ~" . - _1~..."'I --+ - .--' ---t -~------::--- WL'. '. . ,,"-. , I ' -, ' 'I- ~J, -- C .... - ~ ~- - l' __..L - - . I ! . . - - 1 ' -. -- ---'\-- f--------,----f - .-"..-----J"_..-.;-r-- -----f ..~._= -- ' .~ I i:; '."\, ~,~ : I. '---1-:, j -t I" -' l-----'-'''';...,,' u..: ---h'- :: - ] ~~._-~~ -- -Hi,,~fI-:.:..~~~~}f= -'- -.-tr- ! -.j--'.t~----i ..... .'-T.--.------ ---7 '--'7 -- -t -- "U +- - ._1._. -- .. <-:: _ .-l-: ~::;~:-~~S~..~;~-~.". >}:~'~'f=;~:i:-~;l- -~_t~:.;;:..: __ ~-=-.-;. :-F~-:;.,-': - i -j " i.:,'! ""'L . . .. '_1 .__,' I --- .; ," 7'.,-- _ -- t! "... -- -~ -- -J::r.:::z"", T I---.~... j""': - i-' ------- "- -- ----- .----:-:~. ~--.- . i :";-' t f-- . -d'" - - --= -- j -~ - '\. ::~----=-.~-.;~.==t= - .-,. -':-===-=- =.:: =fu:==- ~:~~ ~~ --= -- i :-1 ~ . - ~~ -~- --- ~ ~; ~u. iI' ~.:-==-t~~~jl- _ -. ~ ~~:,:c:=L: ~ -- ~ - - :.:;- ==-~ ::1: ::~~~=f::: ~~ 7 - ~ . -' - - - -. 1---- ~1tt ---~-:= +:=~!=~ ~~~~~;~~~~~f ~~-==t~:-= -:~:I~~~-~-= !-:-~ '.~ ," -~ - - .-.0 7.i. - I - fit ~ - ~:fJ .- -- --j . ..j\ j'-::-:' ::.. -..::~ -----1-.. ------~--- - ~-.-:-: --...! , ,- L '" , I , i . i '- .... .. ;::';~ ! ,",' , ~ I i I :~.-I -----;+-:-1-.:: , ~ -- T ! r.'I , : '"" ~ I I I I i T I: 11' ~-M : ~,--l---- I r-t----- i: " I ..-.--'---.. ,..~ '..1'- I ~: . ~"-- --~~=-~ =; ~-=-'-'ci-.--=-~t==~~=~~~ ;t1~:-:~=:-~=~:::=:Jf---- -.---~--; -~ :::=~ ~_. 1 . , . _ ....1 ." ! __ u --. I I . -~ . --~ --~.....,.., ... __ _~._--I --,"oJ_. : ~-r-.:~, -::!- -- -. . -~.y- I- -..t .'. -""\-- l--~ . ~.~ -- i- ~~-:-;:t\ .. j- , :.-: - - \, . . - -1. : :: ----+-- .-- - -1" __._......_.t"""H~ ....- -_._.~--" . ~-_..~,.- .- I . . I .." ~ -t --- -..- .. + . --._--- ::~--~-:==:= .: :- =-~l:-~-~- : - i -".- 1 .. . .. ~.::r' .. .. -- ~~. 't"~- -- -. .-~ t.,l~- =':~~ ~Pj: l""i-~~ _~_:~ 1 i-\..._~: -:-:+-.l"c :;,T .._-~. :H ...-:- ~-+TT ---;.::-p'~ IE tnt ~.:--. +:-=-~ L ~:'r~+- - -:--- - dt ~, i- '~T"- r ;1~ :-: ~::~"1=.:'::E ~~-~~l=~~': - --: -... --+-t~ "'t" ..L-+---.;'\j~.+-+-'l'~~--.--f~~..- -- " .. '-: :. . .:: .':: ----- i -1.... t ..L..___ ~-"-: --. .. --:- - .". "'~.,~--l--. ''-.1.--- ~-+-.--.,.-+t----+.~~------,- ~...._ i __.. -. '__" -...... ':; ~ '-$."..___-l-.-~~...."--..j...l.~.~ ~--.--.--, ,-,-- .~-+...+__-'n i-+t . , -'7+-..1.\+---ioh-:- c..:~~" ,: ~ .--- - ~-:. .______,. '.J.+rh-.-- 11-#l....L. '1, ,-+ I . '"1" '.:. .-'--......... .----. --. ; . Ii;! ;! iT. ,uT --..- ;.."'.--1... ~ "0: t: j.;... : I , I.. ri+~ I ,~..,,~ ,; fg-"'~+-r: I ---'H--t- -~r 1-" 4 L:' : .+. . - -+-+--'- -t_ +{:-+--''' . 1 ~'n~ "'>0 -~.+-l---- -~c -tf::t,-:-t- + -+- ++=.-r -~ I I : :T i- r~ ',,, I I I ~ ~'1- ~_ t :ij-,.l. -'--4-~.: ..,; ~ ,-T, 'I,: I,,,,, !~ -+-.-h-- +t. _1- +t +-+- ~~. I ..No i-- 1" T ' -W. ,-H ;. : - :j.,+-tt1 i 1JI:I ... ! t-1--;-, ,) I -Ti-t-t- ,;! !! I +-t I .+--+--...+- -4.-+- -+- .i--+- -+ ~ -+-+-1+""-+ + -- + I - :' i I I I, i I! .:.' I I -+-+ +-' :: _l -t.-~+1;- .+-+ i ',,- --4-41 i.l-i-IJ-i T ,i . ! I --1-i---- i _ ,"" I 1 ; -rll' , I -----~ .:.. ., -i 1" _._ .-l- ~ -- ,-...._- ,,-- "_'_-~ ----';---.! . . --..,..-- - ""' ;. - -,,_ J. i" .... T i ---'--'T'---;-' ~._-tt- . "-- '~ IL>'. ~_ I , I. IT i ; I ~--++ J. . . I.' JI~-T~- -4---+- r~4- ; +~ --.--:r" .. . . THE TETON LANE & LILAC LANE HOMEOWNERS' ASSOCIATION ChanhassPri: Ann Ware 474-6902 Representive Contacts Shor'ewood: Marc Simcox 474-5375 PROPERTY OWNERS IN CHANHASSEN ACCESS TO LILAC LANE Mr. & Mrs. C. Pickard 474-0821 1:: 1 ::;:, L i 1 Ci.C LCi.ne Excelsior, MN 55331 Mr. & Mrs. L. Ware 474-6902 1225 L:i. lac Lane Excelsior, MN 55331 Mr. & Mrs. J. Donovan 474-1170 :[ ::::;;::;j U I cH: L'::'.rIE' Excelsior, MN 55331 PROPERTY OWNERS IN CHANHASSEN EASEMENT HOLDERS ON TETON LANE Mr. & Mrs. r Natale 474-7622 Mr. D. Shackelton 5062 Perkinsville Rd. Maple Plain, MN 55359 H: 47'=7'-2159 0: ~A6-:;O 1 E: 6::~~.;1 TE:tcln L_Et.r-tE-? Excelsior, MN 55331 nt"" F:" C'::'iTtF?'- nn ":.:? (::; r:"'::. F.~' {':":i, ::::- E:'i, 1"'1 t~. L. C'l. n E' l;.J.. ion~0 Gay, MN 55331 II ~ 4-?4-I.::,4"-17 I"!I-. ~J. BI- d.11 C €? I (.:1 :~ E~ ~? t/ .-.. :? r..~; () () 25'7E~5 Sl.lj"lj"1yva]p Lar'~p ;::, t. U I e I-F) c, cI \ ~1 1\1 ~; ~;=~ ::::: j F c: c., J ~::. i LI i 'J 1";"ll-'~l ~~.:.; ~.:.:.; ~~; :~; J 1-''"11''" ~:;> ,..tll'" ~:':. .. [3 " h' E':'~. cn (.:.:~. r" 4 -/ ..q. .-....q 4 E!. j t:.:2L:O Tpt.Drl Lc:<.ne [; C F'] ~:,:i C'I", t"l hi :=; =! ::::,.5 j r.cl t-" F r ~':). n c' C'l 1.... C) r- i ~::. LJ ~ it 7' 4... . :~; ~.:.:J '7 ~J F' c [I. 1-"..' 2 (:.::: PROPERTY OWNERS IN SHORE WOOD ACCESS TO LILAC LANE Mr. ~ Mrs. M.A. SimcDx ',:' :I (, (;0 I,) I...:i:l i'" C t... i:':, ri F' ~:: Ii Co I" F' hi C' Co cj, 1"11..1 '.:c;~) ::' :::; :I 4"/ 4-.~j~~:7::'J Mr. S Mrs. J" Brpckheimer ::' 1"/1 U L.j] cO.L L.c,lrlc! ~:"t UIU F:'~\!;oCid, 1"11-1 5~::!::.::.1 474-8352 Mr. & Mrs. E. Hartman :;:' l7E3U Li 1 C:<.C L.artE' ShorewDod, MN 55331 4.7' t+ -.- 6 C;' 1 1 PROPERTY OWNER IN SHOREWoOD WITH PROPERTY ADJACENT TO LILAC LANE Mr. & Mrs. S. W. Simcox {,:I no 1"li}} EitrpF'.t E;: C E':I !::; lCll, l"IN 55:::31 474.....("1690 .. - . ~ IV' ;1' l [ \....' ~. 'l,r 0/ \)~ o. . . RESOLUTICN N). \~, J. Brooks Hauser and Peggy Hauser have applied for a variance ~ the eonstructieR 9f A single famil)l resirlonl"'p nn pFeper~owned ~ 27190 Edgewood Road in the City of Shorewood, legally described in Exhibit A, attached hereto; and WHEREAS, such application seeks approval for the placement of fill on the property within twenty (20) feet of the shoreline; and WHEREAS, Shorewood "Shoreland District" ordinance provisions prohibit the grading or filling of land within twenty (20) feet of the nonnal high water mark; and WHEREAS, a Public Hearing was held and the application reviewed by the Planning Coomission on May 19, 1987; and WHEREAS, a further review of the application was had before the City Council at their regular meeting held on May 26, 1987; and WHEREAS, the City Attorney was directed by resolution of the Council to prepare a resolution setting forth Findings of Fact and Conclusions approving applicant's request for said variance. NJN, TIiEREFCEE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the Ci ty of Shorewood: FINDI~ OF FACr 1. That the subject property is located in a R-lA "Shoreland District. " 2. That Shorewood Ordinance No. 168, Section 200.26, Subd. 7 b(1)(h) states, "No grading or filling shall be permitted within twenty (20) feet of the nonnal high water mark of a water body." 3. That the applicant has presented a landscaping plan for grading, filling, and plantings and has obtained a permit fran the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District to allow rip-rapping of the shoreline. 4. That the lawn area along the lakeshore had been previously pocked with holes and irregularities which constituted a hazardous and an unsightly condi tion in the area. 5. That the filling of such holes has served to create a safer, more attractive, and properly drained lawn. /,,3 /1 I . . cno.USIOOS 1. That the variance requested concerning the placing of fill within twenty (20) feet of the shoreline will constitute an improvement to the property and to the area. 2. That the applicant has established that an undue hardship, as defined by Minnesota Statutes, would exist had the variance not been granted. 3. That based upon the foregoing, the City Council concludes that the applicant's variance request, as set out hereinabove, be and hereby is granted, subject to the following conditions: a. That all berms be at least 20' from the lakeshore. b. That a schedule be provided the City for completion of the irrprovement s. c. That the driveway have an inverted crown, wi th drainage running to a catch basin and clean"'"out. d. That the drainage plan, including profiles and cross-sections, be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. e. That the exist ing fi 11 be covered by 2" of black dirt, but no IOOre fi 11 be placed on the property wi thout approval of the Ci ty. f. That the applicant appoint one individual to work with the City to coordinate all site work. AlX)P!'ED BY TIm CI'lY CUJNCIL of the City of Shorewood this , 1987. day of Robert Rascop, Mayor ATrEST: Sandra L. Kennelly, City Clerk . . lDVARD' S POINT That part of Lot 15 lying Southeasterly of a line parallel with and distant 205.07 feet Southeasterly as measured at right angles from the Northwesterly line of Lot 14 and its Southwesterly extension. EXHIBIT A "\ . . <::! .A 7)"1" \/ WHEREAS, J. Brooks Hauser and Peggy Hauser have applied for a ~J \ variance for tfIe-:c'trnstructiuu uf l:l single-tamllY resic::kucc 8ft })Fepcrty owned S~ by them at 27190 Edgewood Road in the City of Shorewood, legally described in ( Exhibit A, attached hereto; and REOOLUfICN ID. WHEREAS, such application seeks approval for grading a 40 x 45 foot area of the subject property in a 5 to 1 slope; and WHEREAS, Shorewood "Shore land District" ordinance provisions prohibi t grading of property in a greater than 6 to 1 slope; and WHEREAS, a Public Hearing was held and the application reviewed by the Planning Cannission on May 19, 1987; and WHEREAS, a further review of the application was had before the City Council at their regular meeting held on May 26, 1987; and WHEREAS, the Ci ty Attorney was directed by resolution of the Council to prepare a resolution setting forth Findings of Fact and Conclusions denying applicant's request for said variance. r-ov, TIIEREFmE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Shorewood: FINDIN}) OF FACT 1. That the subject property is located in a R-lA "Shoreland District. " 2. That Shorewood Ordinance No. 168, Section 200.26, Subd. 7 b(1)(g) states: "The maxirrun slope of the finished surface which slopes toward a water body or a water course leading to such water body shall be six (6) units horizontal to one (1) vert ical. " 3. That the applicant has presented a landscaping plan for grading and filling a 40 x 45 foot area of the subject property utilizing a slope of five (5) units horizontal to one (1) vertical; 4. That the applicant could meet the slope requirements of the ordinance by the construction of a berm or retaining wall on the subject property. I~jvq. eJ-/ l . . cun.USIrn8 1. That a reasonable use for the property exists under the provisions of the Shorewood "Shore I and District" ordinance. 2. That the applicant has not established that an undue hardship, as defined by Minnesota Statutes, would exist if the variance is not granted. 3. That based upon the foregoing, the City Council concludes that the applicant's variance request, as set out hereinabove, be and hereby is denied. AIX>PI'ED BY 1HE CI'IY axJNCIL of the Ci ty of Shorewood this , 1987. day of Robert Rascop, Mayor ATrEST: Sandra L. Kennelly, City Clerk . . lDVARD'S POINI' That part of Lot 15 lying Southeasterly of a line parallel with and distant 205.07 feet Southeasterly as measured at right angles frOOl the Northwesterly line of Lot 14 and its Southwesterly extension. EXHIBIT A . . RESJLUl'ICN m. A RESOLUl'ICN PlVVIDIID RR A ~ICN aJARGB '10 ~ '10 TIm SIDm\\UD ~ICIPAL WATER SYSTEM WHEREAS, Shorewood Ordinance No. '14, Article IV, Section 1, provides for the Ci ty to charge a property owner who wi shes to connect wi th the lIIlllicipal water system "a connection charge as detennined by resolution of the City Council"; and WHEREAS, the Council has made a detennination of the mmunt to be charged those property owners desiring to connect to the Shorewood Mmicipal Water System. NlV, nmRERIm, BE IT RESOLVED by the Ci ty Counci I of the Ci ty of Shorewood that: 1. Except as set forth in paragraph 2 below, owners of properties which have not been previously assessed for lIIlllicipal water shall pay a connection charge of $4,000.00 plus the cost of a water meter and remote reader upon connect ing to the Shorewood Mmicipal Water System. 2. Connection charges shall not be applicable to properties located within a plat served by the Shorewood Mmicipal Water System wherein the costs of construction of the water system serving the plat have been previously paid in full. 3. CNmers of properties subject to payment of the connection charge set forth in paragraph 1 above who will incur costs for bringing water service up to their property lines shall receive a dollar-for-dollar credit against the connection charge for such costs up to a total credit of $2,000.00. 4. Connection charges shall be in addi tion to the pennit fee prescribed by ordinance and shall be paid to the City at the time the pennit is obtained. .AlX)PlW BY TIm CI'lY CD.H:IL of the City of Shorewood this day of 198'1. ---- Robert Rascop, Mayor AT.l'EST: Sandra L. Kennelly, Ci ty Clerk ., - - ot . . ~ 5546 Wedgewood Drive Shorewood, Minnesota 55331 J u n e 5, 1987 Shorewood City Office 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, Minnesota 55331 RE: SPEED ZONE REDUCTION ON WEDGEWCOO DRIVE IN SHOREWOOD, M I NNE:30T A Wedgewood Drive is presently divided into two speed zones. The d i \J i s i on i ':; found at the Luee Line Tra ii, ~"h i eh intersects Wedgewood. From the Trai I to the south. upon reaching Smithtown F.'oad, the speed limit is posted at 30 MPH. Once crossing the Trai I. the speed IS reduced to 20 MPH. Wedgewood Drive can be described 85 a ver'Y narrow, winding r (I a d wit h s eve r a I b' i n oj d r- e as. C d uti ,) n en u s t b e (I b s e r- v e din S 0 mea t- e a 5 0 f the r 0 ad i nor d e r f ,~, r 'j '" h i (; I est r a vel i n gin opposite directions to pass each 'Jth~r- at the same time. t.-Jhell c:aution IS ign,)red and/or- a vahicl,,, is travel ing at a speed greater than the posted speed I imit. a very dangerous sit u a t ion a r i s e s for ape des tt- jail 0 r a chi I d a t p I a y . T his situation has become very typical on Wedgewood Drive. ~~ith young farni I ies in the area. rnany children can be found 1,1 the neighborhood. Since new home construction IS entering the r1 e i g h b 0 r h (1 (1 d s (! u tho f the T r- a i I. add i t ion a I p e des t ria n sand chi I d r e n 1-.1 i I I 111 0 vel n tot he a r- ea. Wit h the s pee d set 10 1"1PH higher on the souther-n end of the road, these new fami I ias are also threatened by excess-ive speedsr After consulting '-.lith Police Chief, Richard Young. it IS apparent that due to the spl it speed zone, law enforcement has become a difficult task fOf- the officers of South lake Police Department. In order to feel safe in our neighborhood and to encourage our po lice department to enforc e the speed zone, we the undersigned, propose that the entire length of Wedgewood Drive be lowered to 15 MPH. Attached are Wedgewood Drive residents who support the speed zone r"eduction. L. ; n~: Aa9Wr ~J.vJV~~ ~Q~ -' the I j Aagaar~ eA.d~ ~ /~~O .. RES I DENTS SUPPORT. OF SPEED REDUCT ION TO' 1 ~PH WEDGEI,.IOOD DR I VE SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 -;t:.Iu.~-~~~- - ---- -- ---___ k~~11Z~.I~rJ~d:-~- ----.----..---- \\.~.\~.. \~ ~., ~ . ....., ,,"' . ..,::-'.> "~ ..... ',. .'" "'. .' "::'. '. - "". ,'-:" '., --:--::: ..--,""",,\--~'" ~~_....'\...-._._--_.._--- .~-<< - ' "', '"u.t--- ,,- _ '-. " i / l- / .... i. / I /' ,; . ,r..' 'J..~ t .;20(- -~b'-.:;'-'~'~_ -..-~.~- -'~-'-. .,-.----..-.-----..-.---.- "'~j. I", . --. ?, ~ i '\'.-li- \.4 \.. , I /,', / /-..., I ,.J. -1..-......... .1._'_ -~ '-1~,- _ ......-"'-'0,.......... ,w/.-.k........~~_"'=' _ _ _'_ _. .... _ __. ..... ._ _ _.._. '.'/ . ! .-' I . I '\1 ~" '.1 :. ~i ,,\, .J.' '=-.-..''''-'.:J,......~- ~-".--Z '. -7~-...;.-..--. ..--. . -'-::;..:-.~).;---' .----.. ----. .---- /~ ,,' , .i' , " " '::::d:42l.::..t!::-:...(h-__:!2l-:.f~:..:~:..:~~).~: ._____. .____ ')J :/.' i' 'A ) ..: -4.t~ ~:1.tJ.Lt~~j-.: - \..,- 'l A3:!.._ - _. -- - - -. - - --. '&. ' ! C'~ -.'" -;::;--t.tz: >.i~_. -<;"..-.L.~L_~7r-_-----.-. .....---..---- 6~.. ',? /t.:--":! 0 .....-:: .' ,~/ /.' -;:. :? . / ''-:-(:Z~./, ." ~_ ;;,...._..z-:~...-::..."'" . __.____._____ / ~"U _ .' I .. I~. -~{2. _L:_~(;-.:;.~.~.~ __,..-------..----. :: , ...~. -.-"- 1 -/-.",...., _ ("'~ ~~., __::_:;o.___~___.________.. /J.. " / f Vi\; ~~~.. - &16-- ~_,'tJ..: L_ --.----. .---- r 'J;ld1-" 9:l/ - -a....... /~1/1 " ~ / / ,'f .' /, J - ~ - ) - r-"+~---.." ~. ----.---- _.. .' r' --~ /~:-'~ <>_ _____ -- ~,-;o -4-~~-~~-d. --.-----.---- ~~-" - />>1 :).. .. -...uP;. . .-L~ ~.::2- _--;__ .__ __. ~~0' ~~ 5t2t__~"~. 1.______ I r;i..":..r..Y::::-.-. ? e' ~~-- , I",. '). ,f.~,? . I - _....~ ~- --":",, -------- l~ ..~rz!f1.7",'f~,.~... +L-~L~__ \ ff11 , ' "1 A \ \..., '1 t '1/11.' --r..'4.' ,I.~-- ~, ~.' ~._-'--_---.---- 'I lfi'~' IJ.l .'L~_--__-~.. -4-. -. ,:...~ -- . -- ,,-...) -- - - --- !~1~2-L--?)J~-.~-f<:;.~~q------ _~i/~ ,', ____ ,.1 -/ ~ - . '-.......~, ". ~c. .<.6:......~. -; i7..~-.....:.l-~.-..~-~-~~----.---- ~-n---- ~--7------~ . \ d!...L~1.,~'-t!.._j8Jlt:L~___.____ ____..____ ~~-~~LJ7---------- _Y' h I '-~Ll1~---------- '-..d~ I ---------------------------------- ---------~-----------_._----------- ------_._---------------~-------- . .. . CIT'IOF CH'ANHASSEN /0 - 690 COULTER DRIVE. P.O. BOX 147 . CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612)937-1900 ,. ",' ~ MEMORANDUM TO: Don Ashworth, City Manager , , .-1,~ii~2-i-:F'- U8~J._~~::.-~-; . FROM: Gary Warren, City Engineer ! ,...~ ':",c ...;::,;:t .;: ,r..., I ,_~L!. r.L 2,1-_...-.. DATE: June 12, 1987 SUBJ: Revised Sewer Alternate, Church Road Sewer Improvement Project At the May 18, 1987, meeting, the City Council authorized plans and specifications for installation of sanitary sewer on Church Road to service the Wanous and Campbell properties only. This would be accomplished by connecting to the Shorewood Interceptor on West 62nd Street (see Exhibi: G). Since that time, Mr. Gary Carlson has continued to petition the City in an attempt to pro- vide sewer and water across his pro9osed development, i.e. Lots 3 and 4, Schmid's Addition (see attac~ed letter). In reviewing this with our consultant, we have arrived at a revised alternative which perhaps addresses service to Wanous and Campbell as well as the Carlson property. As shown on Exhibit L-2, this would be accomplished by reversing the flow of the sewer and bringing it across Lot 4 of the Carlson property. As documented in his letter, Mr. Carlson is completely in favor of this alternative and is willing to provide all easements at no cost to the City and accept the costs for sewer and water along his property. This could, in fact, result in a reduction in the assessments to the City of Shorewood, Wanous, and Campbell prop- erties as identified in Attachment #4. In addition, this alter- nate, unlike Exhibit G, would allow for extension of sanitary sewer in the future to service the south-end properties of Church Road should this become necessary. Since the Carlson property has not been platted at this point, the City needs some assurances that will bind Mr. Carlson to the providing of easements and likewise payment of the costs of the sewer and water across his property. 'rhe City Attorney has pre- pared the enclosed agreement to address this concern. It is therefore requested that the City Council approve this revised alternative for sewer service to the area contingent on Mr. Carlson entering into the attached agreement with the City and guaranteeing that the assessments to the City of Shorewood, /_5<2 --- C> WEST 5 PARK CITY OF SHOREWOOD ':' (' i-4 i' ~ ~ ;-" I c: ,_, \J I .. 'I ! I ,-' ...... 4 , . . -, , -...' :','0" J! "I '.; ", ~,.... I -,-, '""\" , !-\UU; ; :'_/:\: 1 ~ \ CHURCH ROAD CITY OF CHANHASSEN PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER OPTION 2 \\\\.; ~~~~O~ P~A;;~~N~~~-~N'GI~EE~;:G~C~~~N~~' ~ ~ ~ '~~~ EXHIBIT G I WEST 5 PARK CITY OF SHOREWOOD '\ \ / , 1 I / \ \ c ,....l...4 !\ ~ ' ""' I -.. I ~ ._'\0..... ,If' !lU '- ;..\~~ , ~'E.?- \ - - G~~.~~ h ." ~ \~i S \ ~; ~..s>"\<\\___o \ I_I )7 I il I. Q, , I d I .~ I, I \' I II I \ liT r-- J II .\f"""'IIill.,.....I....,...'.."~ I ~, I' It . '\ I' I I ~'- '-', I , .l III , - f f -'~ , f . \ \ i IL STREET ~ . CHURCH ROAD CITY OF CHANHASSEN PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER & W A TERMAIN OPTlON- NO.3 ,~~~ . -'...: .~ , "7'""". :.. ... '.. ..... _ _ WESTWOOD PLANNING &: ENGINEERING COMPANY ':1 I EXHI~IT L-2 . . AGREEMENT THIS INDENTURE made this day of , 1987, by and between GARY D. CARLSON and MAUREEN G. CARLSON, husband and wife, hereinafter jointly referred to as "Grantors", and the CITY OF CHANHASSEN, a municipal corporation organized under the laws of the State of Minnesota, the Grantee, hereinafter referred to as the "City". The Grantors, in consideration of One and No/IOO Dollars ($1.00) and other good and valuable consideration to them in hand paid by the City, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, do hereby grant unto the City, its successors and assigns, forever, a permanent easement for public sewer and water utilities over, across, on, under and through Lot 4, Schmid's Acre Tracts, County of Carver, State of Minnesota. INCLUDING the rights of the City, its contractors, agents, servants and assigns, to enter upon the easement premises at all reasonable times to construct, reconstruct, inspect, repair and maintain public sewer and water utilities over, across, on, under and through the easement premises, together with the right to grade, level, fill, drain and excavate the easement premises, and the further right to remove trees, bushes, undergrowth and other obstructions interfering with the location, construction and maintenance of said public utilities. The above named Grantors, for themselves, their successors, heirs and assigns do covenant with the City, its successors and assigns, they are well seized in fee title of the above described easement premises and have the sole right to grant and convey the easement to the City. . . GRANTEE CITY OF CHANHASSEN BY: Thomas L. Hamilton, Mayor BY: Don Ashworth, City Manager (SEAL) STATE OF MINNESOTA ss COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 1987, by Gary D. Carlson and Maureen G. Carlson, husband and wife, to me personally known to be the persons described in and who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that they executed the same as their free act and deed of the parties. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ss COUNTY OF CARVER On this day of , 1987, before me, a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared Thomas L. Hamilton and Don Ashworth, to me personally known, who being each by me duly sworn, did say that they are respec- tively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Chanhassen, the municipal corporation named in the foregoing instrument, and that the seal affixed to said instrument is the corporate seal of said municipal corporation, and that said instrument was signed and sealed in behalf of said municipal corporation by authority of its City Council, and said Thomas L. Hamilton and Don Ashworth acknowledged said instrument to be the free act and deed of said corporation. Notary Public DRAFTED BY: Grannis, Grannis, Farrell & Knutson 403 Norwest Bank Building 161 North Concord Exchange South St. Paul, MN 55075 (612)455-1661 -3- . . City Council Meeting - May 18, 1987 the facilities here to our standard with curb and gutter, sanitary sewer and watermain for all properties is probably going to run upwards of $65.00 per front foot of assessments just to give you a general feel. Tbtal construction dollars at $177,000.00 to $178,000.00. We thought it appropriate to look at that at this time because it is a feasibility. The original petition that was received by the City addressed a request for sanitary sewer and watermain for the area and was supported basically by the Wanous and Campbell property in this area. This alternative basically provides service specifically for those properties and would connect to an existing stub and would hook up to the Metro interceptor to the north. Likewise, again the watermain as was shown in the original alternate proposal with trunk watermain coming across, the watermain for the whole area here and just a stub out into the Carlson property because of the uncertainity as to exactly when that would happen but again, providing us for the ultimate connection for looping our system. The costs associated with just specifically providing sanitary sewer runs for the Wanous and Campbell property and the City of Shorewood, would run approximately $32.00 per foot or assessment per unit of roughly $5,000.00 per unit. This last option here would be for providing watermain and sanitary sewer and it does show roadway improvements but basically the recommendation that I have as a second option would be that the roadway be left as a rural section without a curb and gutter and that would reduce the roadway assessment by maybe $4.00 or $5.00 per lineal foot. Dick Koppe is here from Westwood Planning if you have any specific questions and with that introduction I guess I would turn it back to you Mayor. Mayor Hamilton: Okay, I would like to ask for comments. Any residents here have any comments they wish to make? Merle Wanous: I would like to ask Mr. Warren, how did he get the willingness of Shorewood to accept to pay for the watermain? Have you contacted them? Gary Warren: In planning I talked with Dan Vogt, the adminstrator from Shorewood. We have a letter from them stating that they are not in favor of the sewer but because of the park and sprinkling of the ice rinks up there that they were okay on the water. Merle Wanous: I talked to him today and their water is going to be in on Strawberry Lane and West 62nd Street so they are running a main for that new development, 73 homes that are being built so I don't think they would be interested in the watermain there at all and he definitely was against the assessment. He said there was no way the village, they drafted a letter and he said he didn't think they would get involved with water so that's why they didn't particularily address it. We did ask for a small project. It was going to be cost saving but we're coming to the point now where it's getting to be a financial burden. We like the sewer, as far as the option that we have from Campbell and us to the end if it could be put in now and a saving to us. We could hack the $5,000.00 but adding of the curb and gutter. I guess we can live without the water. His first study indicated that we had to have an 8 inch watermain otherwise the water would be stagnant to the other lots because it wouldn't be moving and now because of the change, because of the new development, 6 inch would be okay. I just can't see that I guess and if Shorewood does put water in, we probably could get water from Shorewood a 8 r L . . City Council Meeting - May 18, 1987 All we did when was we took up a petition, me an Wanous for that sewer. We didn't take up for curb serv ice or 28 foot road or water and all that stuff. We thought as long as they're going to dig that road out, we might as well give us our sewer in there because our septic tanks we may be having trouble because they've been there a long time but as far as the water, no because I just put a brand new well in and so did Jim and I don't care to have the water one bit. The rest on the system there, I can't go for it. If you ain't going to put in more for that, I'm going to have to sell out. I'm going to have to leave that. The other thing is, dividing my property to two lots. I've got 200 foot frontage on my property and I'm 95 feet from Jim's property. Now where are you going to get that to put another house in there, I don't understand that. That's going to be an awful small lot to stick a house in. That's all I got to say. r Jim Frizzell: I guess lny feeling on it WaS, this is the option we kind of walked out of the last meeting when we accepted the feasibility study. This was the option that looked the best. We answered the questions of the petition of getting sewer in to Harry and Mr. Wanous and we didn't address the other items, water and enlarging the road because we didn't want it virtually and I think I speak for Kerber also. He didn't want any of that. This latest addition, which came after the last meeting and after we accepted the feasibility study, we just got in the mail on Saturday, I haven't had a chance to review it too much but it looks like we're bearing quite a bit of cost for an addition that we might not want anyway. I guess if I voice my opinion, I like that option the best. I think it answers the needs of the petition that was set out in the first place. L Councilman Geving moved, Councilman Horn seconded to close public hearing. All voted in favor and motion carried. Councilman Johnson: It's a complex issue of looking on one hand into the future and say what's going to happen with this proprty and what's best to be done to support the future and at the same time looking into current residents and saying what can we do for our current citizens. It seems to be two opposite things. The citizens don't need the wider street. They don't want the wider street. They don't want the water as far as the three that started the petition in the first place. I'm torn to tell you the truth between the two. Between good planning and taking the opportunity to make a small improvement to the benefit of a small group of people. That's all I want to say right now. Councilman Geving: I agree, it's a tough decision. We got into this because of the petition for sanitary sewer and when we went for the feasibility study we said let's take a look at all of them. Let's take a look at the possibility of improving the road way in and giving water and I think now that the numbers are before us and the citizens have had a chance to see what those numbers would cost in terms of an annualized interest and assessment for each of the 10 or 20 years for whatever it's assessed, what they're telling us is if this were a project that we approved lock, stock and barrel with all three of those items in there, that they probably couldn't afford to stay in the b area. I think the feasibility told us exactly what we wanted to know. It's certainly feasible. Definitely feasible to put in sanitary sewer, water and 10 . . City Council Meeting - May 18, 1987 guess I feel that it's one of those things where if you're paying the bill it's awfully tough I suppose to have the water put in. At the minimum, I think we should do the sanitary sewer because it's crazy to miss the opportunity and I would susPeCt that in the long run, missing the opportunity of the water is going to be deemed to have been a mistake but from the City standpoint, I would support sewer and I would sure like to have somebody else talk a little bit about the road. It disturbs me but I'm not sure what to do with it. r Mayor Hamilton: Did you have anything addition to say about the road? Gary Warren: We have for example West 65th and Crestview are roads that developed in the past which is similar to what Church Road would be here. Basically, they are being maintained under the current road construction, sewer construction up in those areas. It's a very visible area. It's wide open. It's not like you've got steep bluffs on either side of the road so from that standpoint and there is a lot of clearance between the road and abutting property so you can see PeOple, kids, whatever, approaching you so I guess that's why I say it's not a hazard based on it's width. Councilman Johnson: Do PeOple park up there? I know the Chanhassen Little League plays on that field. What happens when they have a Little League game? Merle Wanous: They park in the church parking lot and walk across. L Councilman Johnson: Because that's not much of a road. Merle Hanous: It has never been much of a road. It has always been, we've been kind of stuck up there but to have us pay to improve the road when everyone else is using it, seems to be very unfair. Councilman Johnson: I would agree with you there. Gary, is there an estimate in here about keeping a rural section but widening it or did it go just either 20 foot road or? Gary Warren: There isn't per se on the feasibility study. I just ran some numbers before I came down and strictly the widening of curb and gutter would add about $5.00 per front foot. Councilman Johnson: What's that per person? Gary Warren: That depends on their frontage. You're looking at about $500.00 to maybe a $1,000.00 for a rural section. Councilman Johnson: It is used by a lot of folks other than the people who live there for one thing, this year Little League is still playing there. South Tonka Little League which includes the City of Chanhassen. People all the way down to the south side of TH 5 go up there during the summer to that road. Is there a way that we can improve, I know there's not much money left, but widening the road the $5.00 per foot for 4 foot wide, we build a 24 foot wide? b 12 . . City Council Meeting - May 18, 1987 Gary Warren: Yes, it's not a big problem. Councilman Horn: What about the end of that park. '!hat field stays pretty wet. It's been a number of years since my son has been in Li ttle League. I know people park along the road up there. '!hey don't all park in that church parkirg lot. They park alorg the road am the em of that field is wet because it doesn't drain properly. It seems to me that our approach with the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission is that we tell them the 20 feet doesn't meet our standard and as long as they are upgrading the road they need to bring it up to our city standards which to me is a 24 foot street with concrete curb and gutter. Gary Warren: My approach I guess is to just tell them that's what we want replaced am let them take the initiative if that's what they will to say we replace what we take out and what you have is a 20 foot section. I'm certainly not going to offer that we volunteer that extra cost. We may be able to negotiate that with them as far as easements and additional things that relate to the whole project so I'm guessing we'll have some opportunity to get them to be flexible. Councilman Horn: I think we talked about this before but if water were to go in later, would that go beside the road or through it? Gary Warren: It could go beside the road especially if it was left the rural section. L Councilman Horn: So that would make a difference? Gary Warren: If we go to a full section then we would cut into more of the right-of-way. We've got a very narrow right-of-way right now as it stands but I guess if you have it given where you have a recently redone paved surface, that would depend on the condition of that roadway. Whether we would go under the roadway or go on the side. Councilman Horn: Are you talking about a 20 foot rural section road? Councilman Geving: That's correct. That's all that's there now. Councilman Johnson: Would you like any comment on that as far as encouraging finding other funding or encouraging Met Councilor somehow or another to improve the roadway if we can talk them into it? Councilman Geving: I think we should encourage the City Engineer and Staff to look to the Metropolitan Council for the potential for increasing the width of the road and hopefully fiming the funding to do that. Mayor Hamilton: I hope that's a given that Gary is going to get as much as he can out of Met Council. If he can get curb am gutter and an extra 4 feet of paved, then go ahead. Councilman Geving: I think you're right. '!hat's a given item. '!hat is Gary's job. 14 ~.:.\. ... ...<.<.'............. '.. . .' MEMO TO: . . MAYOR Robert Rascop COUNCIL Jan Haugen Kristi Stover Robert Gagne Barb Brancel CITY OF SHOREWOOD ADMINISTRATOR Daniel J. Vag! 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD . SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 · (612) 474-3236 ~tf~ascop and Councilmembers Da~VOgt. Ev Beck FROM: RE: Budget Preparation for 1988 DATE: June 17. 1987 Budget Preparation for 1988 is underway and we are seeking input from the Council. First. a few comments regarding the restriction of revenues. The new tax law passed by the legislature this past session imposes a three percent levy limit on all cities for payable 1988. In the past. cities with less than 5000 in population were excluded from levy limit restrictions. A copy of a memo from the League of Minnesota Cities is attached which discusses the levy limits. Also. Local Government Aid is frozen at 1987 levels. Revenue Sharing has been eliminated and Community Development Block Grant. CDBG. funding is becoming more restricted. Due base may need to the increase in taxing in Shorewood over the past few years. the used in the 3% levy formula is not as restrictive to Shorewood as it first appear. Gone. however. is the ability to tax heavily when the for revenue may be great. We would appreciate input from you in regards to: 1. Mill Rate 2. Overall % increase in expenditures. 3. New Programs you wish to have implemented. 4. Buildings improved or purchased. such as for salt storage. 5. Contingency reserve level. Current level is $500.000 but we roughly estimate that $100.000 will be used for expenditures that were not budgeted in 1987. 6. Salaries. 7. Other. The information formula t ion of when we discuss requested above is vital in order for staff to begin the 1988 budget. This data will be used as a guideline the budget with department heads. At some point in the future. staff will discuss a time schedule that wil be intended to guide completion and final adoption of the 1988 budget prior to the October 10 deadline. Please night. contact DJV/slq either of us if you have any questions prior 'to Monday A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore 15!} ~ 1III'III1G . . league of minnesota cities June 2, 1987 MEMORANDUM TO: Mayors, Managers, Clerks r\ a. · . Donald A. Slater, Executive Directo~~aL'~ ~ Laurie Fiori Hacking, Legislative Represe~v~ Legislature Imposes Tighter Levy Limits FROM: RE: The new tax law, signed by Governor Perpich on May 28, imposes a very stringent three percent levy limit on all cities beginning for payable 1988. Unless changed next year, the new law will also tighten levy limits on cities in 1989 and subsequent years as well as permanently subject small cities (with populations under 5,000) to levy limits. Along with the freezing of Local Government Aid (LGA) at 1987 levels, these levy limits will make city budgeting extremely difficult. The impetus for tighter limits came from legislators' fears that, unless unilaterally restrained, local property tax levels would increase dramatically next year, a result of changes in the school aid formula, the loss of federal assistance (particularly revenue sharing) and the limits placed on state aid through the LGA and homestead credit programs. This memo is intended to provide detailed information about the new levy limit law and the appeals process that is available to cities. League staff would also like to request that, as your city's prepares next year's budget, information about problems caused by the levy limits be forwarded to the League so that we can effectively argue against levy limits when the Legislature considers changes in the law next year. This information will also be valuable as the League meets with Department of Revenue officlals to discuss specifics of the appeals process and to assure that the Department plans to adhere to the full intent of the law in administering the appeals process. How the 1988 Levy Limit Will Work In payable 1988, all cities (including small cities) will be subject toa tightened three percent levy limit. The payable 1988 levy limit will be determined as follows: 1) the levy limit base is equal to: the city's payable 1987 c":o:; t,,, ;:]venue east. st, pauL fTiiilnEo"DtiJ '.:' C:' [[-31 ;:'::;J ~::?~?7-5600 , . . levy (excluding amounts levied for debt service and unfunded accrued pension liabilities) plus 1987 LGA, taconite aid, and wetlands/native prairie reimbursements; 2) the levy limit base determined in step 1 is increased by the percentage growth in population or in number of households, whichever is greater, for the most recent l2-month period (if no population growth or a population decline is experienced, the levy limit base determined in step 1 remains the same); 3) multiply the amount resulting from steps 1 & 2 by 103%; 4) the amount determined in step 3 is reduced by the amount of LGA, taconite aid, and wetlands/native prairie reimbursements certified to be received in 1988; 5) Step 4 yields the 1988 levy limit except that amounts levied for debt service, unfunded accrued pension liabilities, income maintenance and social service programs are exempt from the levy limit. Appeals Process For payable 1988 only, a city will be allowed to appeal to the Commissioner of Revenue for an adjustment in its levy limit base if the city "can provide evidence satisfactory to the commissioner that its levy for taxes payable in 1987 had been reduced because it had made expenditures from reserve funds, or for any other reason, or that it is necessary to levy additional amounts for taxes payable in 1988 which were not levied in 1987." Although this language is very broad and could be interpreted liberally, it is likely that the Revenue Department will attempt to construe it narrowly. For example, at this point it is not clear whether the Revenue Department will allow an adjustment in a city's levy limit base for moneys lost in general revenue sharing or other federal or state funding. 1989 Levy Limit For payable 1989 and beyond, the levy limit law generally reverts to the levy limit language that was in effect for payable 1987, with two exceptions: the inflation (implicit price deflator) factor will be capped at 3 percent, instead of 5 percent as under prior law, and small cities with populations under 5,000 would be permanently brought under levy limits. The levy limit base used in determining the payable 1989 levy limit will be equal to the base determined for payable 1988. (This section of the new law contains a drafting error which would exempt ~tatutory cities from levy limits; this error is likely to be corrected next year.) If you have any questions about the new levy limit law or any other aspects of the tax bill, please contact Laurie Fiori Hacking or Sarah Hackett of the League staff.