The URL can be used to link to this page

032486 CC Reg AgP .. .1 . ~ . COUNCIL CHAMBERS 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD 7:30 P.M. .. CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MONDAY, MARCH 24, 1986 AGENDA CALL TO-ORDER -~:A. Pledge of Allegiance B. Roll Call Mayor Rascop Haugen Shaw Stover Gagne 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. Regular Council Minutes - March 10, 1986 (Att# lA - Minutes) 2. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR A. B. 3. PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT A. B. 4. PARK COMMISSION REPORT A. Recommendation to payoff sewer fund loan. B. 5. CONSENT AGENDA A. Garbage Collectors Licenses 1. B.F.I. (Browning-Ferris Industries) 2. Crosstown Sanitation 3. Quality Waste Control 4. R & W Sanitation 5. Waste Management 6. Westonka (Att# 5A - Applications) COUNCIL AGENDA MONDAY, MARCH 24, 1986 page two 5. CONSENT AGENDA - continued B. Cable Commission Appointment Dean Johnson 5875 Cathcart Drive (Att# 5B - Memo) Moved Seconded Vote 6. TEMPORARY SIGN PERMIT Applicant: Location: Lakeshore Equipment Sales 19285 State HIghway 7 (Att# 6A - Planner's Report) 7. SE AREA TRUNK WATER STATUS REPORT , 8. SHOREWOOD OAKS DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT/WATER REQUEST STATUS REPORT (Att# 8 - Staff Report) 9. PLANNER'S REPORT A. Near Mountain Development Agreement Status Report B. Smithtown Circle - Petition for public improvement (Staff Report pending) 10. ATTORNEY'S REPORT A. Nephew Law Suit Update B. 11. ENGINEER'S REPORT A. Cathcart Area Proposed Project (Att# llA - Feasibility Report) B. - , , COUNCIL MINUTES MONDAY, MARCH 24, 1986 page three 12. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS A. Murfin Correspondence (Att# 12A - Murfin Letter City Response) B. Notice of Claim - Robert Marshall (Att# 12B - Notice City Letter to Ins. Agent) C. Discussion - Temporary Secretarial Position (Temporary replacement for Patti Helgesen) D. Response to Police Department Draft Contract (Att# 12D - Response) E. Proceeding with Public Works Equipment Purchase (Truck with Plow and Sander) F. Race Routing Approval Request (Att# 12F - Letter of Request 1985 City Approval Letter) G. Minnehaha Creek Watershed District - Maintenance and Repair Fund (RFP) (Att# 12G - Letter of Denial) 13. MAYOR'S REPORT A. B. 14. COUNCIL REPORT A, B. 15. APPROVAL OF CLAIMS AND ADJOURNMENT ~ CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MONDAY, MARCH 10, 1986 COUNCIL CHAMBERS 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD 7:30 P.M. M I NUT E S CALL TO ORDER Mayor Rascop called the regular Council meeting of Monday, March 10, 1986, to order at 7:30 P.M. in the City Council Chambers. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Mayor Rascop opened the meeting with the Pledge of Allegiance and a prayer. ROLL CALL Present: Mayor Rascop, Councilmembers Gagne, Haugen and Stover (Shaw absent) Staff: Attorney Froberg, Engineer Norton, Administrator Vogt, and Clerk Kennelly APPROVAL OF MINUTES Gagne moved, seconded by Haugen, to approve the minutes of the regular meeting of February 24, 1989 as corrected under Fire Lanes (page 4). Motion carried - 4 ayes. CONSENT AGENDA Park Commission Appointment - Michael Jurgens The Park Commission has recommended appointment of Michael Jurgens of 5535 Shorewood Lane to the vacancy on the Commission. Finance Committee Appointments The following people have expressed an interest in being reappointed to the Finance Committee: John Bridge Maria Malooly Steve Frazier Kathy Amlaw Kitty Francen Michael Fonte Haugen moved, seconded by Gagne, to approve the Park Commission Appointment and the Finance Committee reappointments as listed above. Motion carried - 4 ayes. ENGINEER'S REPORT S.E. Area Trunk Water System Report Engineer Norton has received a letter from MnDOT, the District 5 office, indicating that they are proceeding with the approvals needed to obtain a site from them for a water tower, if needed. COUNCIL MINUTES MONDAY, MARCH 10, 1986 page two . "- ENGINEER'S REPORT - continued S.E. Area Trunk Water System Report - continued Administrator Vogt reported on. the progress with the Near Mountain Development Agreement. Developer Pflaum does not want to sign the Water petition until a Development Agreement has been signed. Vogt indicated that it could cost $85,000 additional in capital costs to the developers if this project is not levied to 1986 taxes payable in 1987. All the petitions must be received in order to levy the project costs. Pflaum feels there should be an amount built into the contract to reimburse the developers towards their cost of the water system for each outside commection to the system. MnDOT Plans Norton informed the Council of plans by the Highway Department to mill and overlay State Highway 7 from Excelsior east to St. Louis Park. The bid will be let May 23, 1986. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT Shorewood Oaks - Water Extension Vogt reviewed for the Council the progress of the Shorewood Oaks project. He attended a meeting today discussing the proposal to extend water from the Boulder Bridge system to this project. Clarification - Assistant Public Works Director The Bureau of Mediation Services has determined that the position of Assistant Public Works Director should be included as a member of the unit. Tingewood Letter A letter has been received from Mr. Harmsen of the Bank of Minne- apolis and Trust Company introducing himself as a new owner of the Tingewood project together with Mr. Erickson. They will be attending the Council meeting of March 24, and request the cooperation of the Council in reinstating the P.U.D. status for the project. Gagne would be in favor of the P.U.D. Zoning if bonds or sureties are obtained. Attorney Froberg stated that the Court case has been completed and a total of $441,672 in liens were filed. This property will now go up at a public auction. Froberg would like to see a title opinion and proof that the property is free from all incumberances prior to reissuing the P.U.D. COUNCIL MINUTES MONDAY, MARCH 10, 1986 page three 7:45 PUBLIC HEARING CDBG Fund - Year XII Allocation RESOLUTION NO. 18-86 The Public Hearing was opened at 7:45 P.M. by Mayor Rascop to hear public comment on proposed uses of the Year XII CBDG Funds. A request was made for $2,537 to be used for expenses at the South Shore Senior Center. It was recommended by staff to allocate $13,128 to Rehab of private property. After asking for further public comments and receiving none, Mayor Rascop closed the public hearing at 7:50 P.M. Haugen moved, seconded by Stover, to allocate the Year XII CDBG Funds to: South Shore Senior Center Rehab of Private Property Motion carried by Roll Call Vote $ 2,537. $ 13,128. - 5 ayes. ,- 4; .1IItIJ ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT Response to South Lake Minnetonka Public Safety Department Stover would like to wait for response from the other~council- members prior to commenting on the letter from Excelsivr's manager. Council directed the Administrator to contact the various Councils and request their comments. Cable Commission The Cable Commission would like the area cities to submit information to the Commission for a televised report. This report would be done by a volunteer host at no cost to the cities. Waterford Site Fatality and Injury A summons has been received and turned over to the City Attorney and to the Insurance Company for action. This summons is from a party that was injured at Waterford during the utility installation. HERITAGE RESIDENCE A request for a draft water petition came from Joe Gorecki, representative for the Heritage Residence project. Gorecki will individually contact all of the property owners along the proposed water extension in an effort to get them to accept an assessment for a water improvement. Stover inquired as to the percentage of people it would take to accept a petition for the improvement. Froberg indicated that all the affected residences would have to sign the petition or a public hearing would be necessary, 35% of the signed petitioners is necessary in order to hold a hearing. COUNCIL MINUTES MONDAY, MARCH 10, 1986 page four HERITAGE RESIDENCE - continued Rascop moved, seconded by Haugen, to authorize the drafting of a petition asking for the improvement. Motion carried - 3 ayes _ 1 nay (Stover) ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT - continued Request for Funding -Minnehaha Creek Watershed - Administrator Vogt has requested funding from the Watershed Dis~ trict for a drainage ditch clean out project in the Eureka Road and Mann Lane area. He has an estimated cost of $8200. Christmas Lake Access Plans have been received for the lake access on Christmas Lake. These plans have been submitted to the Engineer, Planner, and Commissions for comments, staff to comment by March 14th. NEAR MOUNTAIN DISCUSSION Pete Pflaum, developer of the Near Mountain project, was present to explain to the Council his concerns on signing the water petition. He explained that he had been asked by Robert Mason not to sign the petition because Mason was concerned about the manner in which the property would be assessed. A meeting was later he~d between the developers to discuss the allocation of water improvement costs per unit. Mr. Mason has reduced the density o~s multipl~ and requested a reduction in. the assessment7'IHi. total~ be reduced from 608 to 53t111fh..... .,e e. area developers cost per unit will go from $1581 to $I'58~ugen felt that Mason should be responsible for the originalas~essment unless the other developers agree to the increase. Pflaum indicated that the other developers have accepted the increase. Pflaum does feel that there should be a figure agreed upon for reimbursement for connections made outside the project. Gagne does not feel that a payback to the developers is justified because they were the ones that requested the water system. Pflaum asked if preparation of plans and specification could be approved subject to his signing of the petition. Authorization of Plans and Specifications RESOLUTION NO. 19-86 S.E. Area Water Trunk System. Stover moved, seconded by Gagne, to authorize the preparation of plans and specification subject to receiving signatures of 100% of the petitioners. Motion carried by Roll Call Vote - 4 ayes. COUNCIL MINUTES MONDAY, MARCH 10, 1986 page five ATTORNEY'S REPORT Fire Lane Resolution Attorney Froberg indicated that the meaning of the words "Fire Lane" was unclear. Fire marshall Kuhnly will obtain individual permission from the affected property owners to allow emergency vehicle access. Vine Hill Furniture Violation The complaint has been prepared and will be sworn in when the Planner is available to file it with the court. MAYOR'S REPORT Lake Minnetonka Task Force A Public Hearing will be held by the Task Force on March 12 at the Edina City Hall and March 13 at the Minnetonka City Hall. LMCD Meeting At the last meeting, the LMCD made the determination to outlaw the right to hold bass tournaments on Lake Minnetonka. COUNCIL REPORTS Staff Liaison Stover requested an executive session to be held at the end of the current meeting for the purpose of reporting to the Council as the staff liaison. Ludwig Award Support RESOLUTION NO. 20-86 Haugen requested the Council's support in the form of a Resolution supporting C. Wayne Courtney, Mayor of Edina, as recipient of the C. C. Ludwig Award. He was very helpful to Shorewood in dealing with the Metro Waste Control Commission. Rascop moved, seconded by Stover, to support the nomination of Mr. Courtney for the Ludwig Award. Motion carried by Roll Call Vote. APPROVAL OF CLAIMS AND ADJOURNMENT Haugen moved, seconded by Gagne, to adjourn the regular Council meeting of march 10, 1986 at 8:53 P.M. subject to an executive session to discuss personnel matters. Motion carried - 4 ayes. -- ~--_. - ._.__.....,~--_.--~ -- --- ---- - ---_.~_._._. -------- --- COUNCIL MINUTES MONDAY, MARCH 10, 1986 page six APPROVAL OF CLAIMS AND ADJOURNMENT - continued General Fund 00-00166-02 Checks # 31786 31841 Checks # 200166 - 200182 and # 200194 = Total = $ 36,966.06 8,028,44 $ 44,994.50 Liquor Fund 00-00174-02 Checks # 4427 4468 Checks # 200183 - 200193 = Total = $ 46,685.38 2,393.60 $ 49,078.98 RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, Sandra Kennelly City Clerk Mayor Rascop SLK: sn -" :/' ./ CITY OF REGULAR MONDAY, ~ , I,"~r"~' " SHOREWOOD ~'1>t'''''' < ", " COUNCIL MEETING MARCH 10, 1986 '. " II . .. 0-.' ~ . . .............4eCIL CHAMBERS 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD. 7:30 P.M. M I NUT E S CALL TO ORDER Mayor Rascop called the regular Council meeting of Monday, March 10, 1986, to' order at 7:30 P.M. in the City Council Chambers. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Mayor Rascop opened the meeting with the Pledge of Allegiance and a prayer. ROLL CALL Present: Mayor Rascop, Councilmembers Gagne, Haugen and Stover (Shaw absent) Staff: Attorney Froberg, Engineer Norton, Administrator Vogt, and Clerk Kennelly APPROVAL OF MINUTES Gagne moved, seconded by Haugen, to approve the minutes of the regular meeting of February 24, 1989 as corrected under Fire Lanes (page 4). Motion carried - 4 ayes. CONSENT AGENDA Park Commission Appointment - Michael Jurgens The Park Commission has recommended appointment of Michael Jurgens of 5535 Shorewood Lane to the vacancy on the Commission. Finance Committee Appointments The following people have expressed an interest in being reappointed to the Finance Committee: John Bridge Maria Malooly Steve Frazier Kathy Amlaw Kitty Francen Michael Fonte Haugen moved, seconded by Gagne, to approve the Park Commission Appointment and the Finance Committee reappointments as listed above. Motion carried - 4 ayes. ENGINEER'S REPORT S.E. Area Trunk Water System Report Engineer Norton has received a letter from MnDOT, the District 5 office, indicating that they are proceeding with the approvals needed to obtain a site from them for a water tower, if needed. COUNCIL MINUTES . MONDAY, MARCH 10, 1986 page two . ENGINEER'S REPORT - continued S.E. Area Trunk Water System Report - continued ~dministrator Vogt reported on the progress with the Near Mountain Development Agreement. Developer Pflaum does not want to sign the Water petition until a Development Agreement has been signed. Vogt indicated that it could cost $85,000 additional in capital costs to the developers if this project is not levied to 1986 taxes payable in 1987. All the petitions must be received in order to levy the project costs. Pflaum feels there should be an amount built into the contract to reimburse the developers towards their cost of the water system for each outside commection to the system. MnDOT Plans Norton informed the Council of plans by the Highway Department to mill and overlay State Highway 7 from Excelsior east to St. Louis Park. The bid will be let May 23, 1986. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT Shorewood Oaks - Water Extension Vogt reviewed for the Council the progress of the Shorewood Oaks projectc. He attended a meeting today discussing the proposal to extend water from the Boulder Bridge system to this project. Clarification - Assistant Public Works Director The Bureau of Mediation Services has determined that the position of Assistant Public Works Director should be included as a member of the unit. Tingewood Letter A letter has been received from Mr. Harmsen of the Bank of Minne- apolis and Trust Company introducing himself as a new owner of the Tingewood project together with Mr. Erickson. They will be attending the Council meeting of March 24, and request the cooperation of the Council in reinstating the P.U.D. status for the project. Gagne would be in favor of the P.U.D. Zoning if bonds or sureties are obtained. Attorney Froberg stated that the Court case has been completed and a total of $441,672 in liens were filed. This property will now go up at a public auction. Froberg would like to see a title opinion and proof that the property is free from all incumberances prior to reissuing the P.U.D. COUNCIL MINUTES 4It MONDAY, MARCH 10, 1986 page three . 7:45 PUBLIC HEARING CDBG Fund - Year XII Allocation RESOLUTION NO. 18-86 The Public Hearing was opened at 7:45 P.M. by Mayor Rascop to hear public comment on proposed uses of the Year XII CBDG Funds. A request was made for $2,537 to be used for expenses at the South Shore Senior Center. It was recommended by staff to allocate $13,128 to Rehab of private property. After asking for further public comments and receiving none, Mayor Rascop closed the public hearing at 7:50 P.M. Haugen moved, seconded by Stover, to allocate the Year XII CDBG Funds to: South Shore Senior Center Rehab of Private Property Motion carried by Roll Call Vote $ 2,537. $ 13,128. - 5 ayes. ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT Response to South Lake Minnetonka Public Safety Department Stover would like to wait for response from the other Council- members prior to commenting on the letter from Excelsior's manager. Council directed the Administrator to contact the various Councils and request their comments. Cable Commission The Cable Commission would like the area cities to submit information to the Commission for a televised report. This report would be done by a volunteer host at no cost to the cities. Waterford Site Fatality and Injury A summons has been received and turned over to the City Attorney and to the Insurance Company for action. This summons is from a party that was injured at Waterford during the utility installation. HERITAGE RESIDENCE A request for a draft water petition came from Joe Gorecki, representative for the Heritage Residence project. Gorecki will individually contact all of the property owners along the proposed water extension in an effort to get them to accept an assessment for a water improvement. Stover inquired as to the percentage of people it would take to accept a petition for the improvement. Fro?erg indica~e~ that all the affected residences would have to slgn the petltlon or a public hearing would be necessary, 35% of the signed petitioners is necessary in order to hold a hearing. COUNCIL MINUTES ~ MONDAY, MARCH 10, 1986 page four ~ HERITAGE RESIDENCE - continued Rascop moved, seconded by Haugen, to authorize the drafting of a petition asking for the improvement. Motion carried - 3 ayes _ 1 nay (Stover) ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT - continued Request for Funding -Minnehaha Creek Watershed - Administrator Vogt has requested funding from the Watershed Dis~ trict for a drainage ditch clean out project in the Eureka Road and Mann Lane area. He has an estimated cost of $8200. Christmas Lake Access Plans have been received for the lake access on Christmas Lake. These plans have been submitted to the Engineer, Planner, and Commissions for comments, staff to comment by March 14th. NEAR MOUNTAIN DISCUSSION Pete Pflaum, developer of the Near Mountain project, was present to explain to the Council his concerns on signing the water petition. He explained that he had been asked by Robert Mason not to sign the petition because Mason was concerned about the manner in which the property would be assessed. A meeting was later he~d between the developers to discuss the allocation of water improvement costs per unit. Mr. Mason has reduced the density of his multiple project and requested a reduction in the assessment. His total units will be reduced from 608 to 534. The area developers cost per unit will go from $1581 to $1684. Haugen felt that Mason should be responsible for the original assessment unless the other developers agree to the increase. Pflaum indicated that the other developers have accepted the increase. Pflaum does feel that there should be a figure agreed upon for reimbursement for connections made outside the project. Gagne does not feel that a payback to the developers is justified because they were the ones that requested the water system. Pflaum asked if preparation of plans and specification could be approved subject to his signing of the petition. Authorization of Plans and Specifications RESOLUTION NO. 19-86 ~E. Area Water Trunk System. Stover moved, seconded by Gagne, to authorize the preparation of plans and specification subject to receiving signatures of 100% of the petitioners. Motion carried by Roll Call Vote - 4 ayes. COUNCIL MINUTES ~ MONDAY, MARCH 10, 1986 page five . ATTORNEY'S REPORT Fire Lane Resolution Attorney Froberg indicated that the meaning of the words "Fire Lane" was unclear. Fire marshall Kuhnly will obtain individual permission from the affected property owners to allow emergency vehicle access. Vine Hill Furniture Violation The complaint has been prepared and will be sworn in when the Planner is available to file it with the court. MAYOR'S REPORT Lake Minnetonka Task Force A Public Hearing will be held by the Task Force on March 12 at the Edina City Hall and March 13 at the Minnetonka City Hall. LMCD Meeting At the last meeting, the LMCD made the determination to outlaw the right to hold bass tournaments on Lake Minnetonka. COUNCIL REPORTS Staff Liaison Stover requested an executive session to be held at the end of the current meeting for the purpose of reporting to the Council as the staff liaison. Ludwig Award Support RESOLUTION NO. 20-86 Haugen requested the Council's support in the form of a Resolution supporting C. Wayne Courtney, Mayor of Edina, as recipient of the C. C. Ludwig Award. He was very helpful to Shorewood in dealing with the Metro Waste Control Commission. Rascop moved, seconded by Stover, to support the nomination of Mr. Courtney for the Ludwig Award. Motion carried by Roll Call Vote. APPROVAL OF CLAIMS AND ADJOURNMENT Haugen moved, seconded by Gagne, to adjourn the regular Council meeting of march 10, 1986 at 8:53 P.M. subject to an executive session to discuss personnel matters. Motion carried - 4 ayes. . --_. -." --, - ~,.".-.. -".""--'--.---.~- ~=--._~~ --~~'j'=";=~- COUNCIL MINUTES ~ MONDAY, MARCH 10, 1986 page six - . APPROVAL OF CLAIMS AND ADJOURNMENT - continued General Fund 00-00166-02 Checks # 31786 31841 = $ 36,966.06 Checks # 200166 - 200182 and # 200194 = 8,028,44 Total $ 44,994.50 Liquor Fund 00-00174-02 Checks # 4427 4468 Checks # 200183 - 200193 Total $ 46,685.38 2,393.60 $ 49,078.98 RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, Sandra Kennelly City Clerk Mayor Rascop SLK: sn - I,.---.~ J CHECK NO 31787 31788 31789 31790 31791 31792 31793 31794 31795 31796 31797 31798 31799 31800 31801 31802 31803 31804 31805 31806 31807 31808 31809 31810 31811 31812 31813 31814 31815 31816 31817 31818 31819 31820 31821 31822 31823 31824 31825 31826 31827 31828 31829 31830 31831 31832 31833 31834 31835 31836 31837 31838 ,=c';::';';.;~2:c..::;31839 . . GENERAL FUND - BILLS PAID SINCE MARCH 5;1986 TO WHOM PAID State Treasurer - Soc Sec. PERA The Minnetonka Bank Commissioner of Revenue ICMA Retirement Assoc. City County Credit Union AFSCME Local #224 Medcenters Health Plan Minnegasco Void Acro-Minnesota, Inc. Earl F. Andersen & Assoc AT&T Communications Bob's Personal Coffee Servo California Contractors Supp. Carmichie1 Auto Parts ChaskaParts Service Clutch & U-Joint D.R. Copier Service, Inc. Hance Hdwe, Inc. Hanus Sales & Repair Facility Froberg & Penberthy, P.A. Hennepin Cty Treasurer Lawson Products, Inc. Leef Bros., Inc. Lyman Lumber Company Mi 11er /Davis Company' Minnetonka Community Servo Commissioner of Transp. Morton Thioko1, Inc. Wm. Mueller & Sons, Inc. Munitech, Inc. Navarre Hardware NSP Photo Factory Orr-Sche1en-Mayeron Pepsi Cola Bottling Co. Shelley Zaun Victoria Repair & Mfg Warner Hdwe, Inc. Water Products Co. Wayzata Auto Servo Inc. White Bear Animal Control Metropolitan Waste Ctr1 Commissioner of Revenue Sheraton Northwest Martey Jakel Ken Jarcho Ins. Agency PERA State Treas. - Soc. Sec. The Minnetonka Bank Commissioner of Revenue c,c_:_ ;"c-d~ ':1letci:~A..oe..:..~~ CC,-'e;;--c- PURPOSE March 1, '86 payroll - Soc See March 1, '86 payroll - PERA March 1, '86 payroll - FWH March 1, '86 payroll - SWH March 1, '86 payroll - ICMA March 1, '86 Payroll deductions March 1, '86 payroll - Union Dues March, 1986 Employees Health Ins Utilities - Knightsbridge Rd. Void Office Supplies Traffic Control Signs Telephone Service - City Hall Coffee, Tea, Etc. - City Hall Small Tools Tail light lens Hydraulic Hoses U-Joint Toner for copier Copper Tubing & Fittings Repack hoist - Truck t-1 Legal Fees, S.E. Water Study Board & Room - Prisoners Shop Supplies Laundry Service - City Hall/Garage Shelf in shop Well Permit Forms City Share of Mtka Re1amping 7 & 41 Ice Control - Salt Ice Control - Sand Maintenance Servo - Sewer/Water Shop Supplies City-Wide Electricity Film & Developing Engineering Fees Pop - City Hall 10 Horse Permit Inspections Washer Rack B1dg Maintenance - City Hall/Garage Water Meters & Couplings Equipment Maintenance February '86 Contract SAC Charges - Feb. '86 Feb. Fuel Tax Clerks Conference Mileage - Ice Rinks Ins. for Electronic Data & Word Mar. 15 '86 payroll - PERA Mar. 15 '86 payroll - FICA Mar. 15 '86 payroll - FWH Mar. 15 '86 payroll - SWH -Mar. 15 ~ay~Q-i!:"'=!~"- -~-'.- AMOUNT $ 2,063.46 1,124.00 1,666.32 740.30 263.00 42.00 41. 22 374.70 82.17 0.0 40.00 225.30 9.17 30.70 149.82 15.00 18.89 34.49 70.00 2.50 69.40 6,190.25 619.00 133.08 167.89 26.90 25.00 Comm Serv Program 2,090.00 73.37 589.18 497.09 3,625.00 78.06 662.19 31. 69 5,292.45 83.95 80.00 30.00 17.04 825.84 21.75 528.43 1,881.00 13.26 95.40 4.20 Proc. 250.00 1,097.90 1,903.00 1,583.83 703.39 263.00'- CONTINUED ON NEXT ~AGE........................ . . GENERAL FUND - BILLS PAID SINCE MARCH 5, 1986 CHECK NO TO WHOM PAID 31840 City-County Credit Union 31841 NSP PAYROLL CHECK LIST 200166 200167 200168 200169 200170 200171 200172 200173 200174 200175 200176 200177 200178 200179 200180 200181 200182 200194 -~........,,_.~ ---~---~ - ~~-=_-:---:-:_~..._~,"_m Void Void Sandra L. Kennelly Susan A. Niccum Evelyn T. Beck Kathleen G. Schwank1 Bradley J. Nielsen Patricia R. Helgesen Charles S. Davis Dennis D. Johnson Daniel J. Randall Howard Stark Ralph A. Weh1e Donald E. Zdrazi1 Martey Jakel Christopher G. O'Neill Stuart W. Mabusth Daniel J. Vogt PURPOSE Mar. 15 '86 payroll Deductions City-Wide Electricity SUBTOTAL Void Void 80 hrs 80 hrs 80 hrs 80 hrs 80 hrs 80 hrs 80 hrs 82 hrs 82 hrs 81 hrs 80 hrs 80 hrs 9 hrs 5.5 hrs 4 hrs 80 hrs SUBTOTAL TOTAL AMOUNT 42.00 378.48 $ 36,966.06 0.0 0.0 611.49 450.44 687.30 463.86 718.16 527.61 544.03 610.66 610.18 564.42 519.31 780.17 42.75 23.38 17.00 857.68 $ 8,028.44 $ 44,994.50 . CHECK NO 4427 4428 4429 4430 4431 4432 4433 4434 4435 4436 4437 4438 4439 4440 4441 4442 4443 4444 4445 4446 4447 4448 4449 4450 4451 4452 4453 4454 4455 4456 4457 4458 4459 4460 4461 4462 4463 4464 4465 4466 4467 4468 . . LIQUOR FUND - BILLS PAID SINCE MARCH 5, 1986 TO WHOM PAID Sparkling Lines BellBoy Corporation Butch's Bar Supply Chermak Refrigeration Co. G & K Services Eagle Distr. Co.. Griggs, Cooper & Co. Intercontinental Pkg Co. Jude Candy & Tobacco East Side Beverage Co. Mark VII Distr. Inc. Minnegasco Nelson Enterprises North Star Ice Pepsi Cola Bottling Co. Ed Phillips & Sons Co. Pogreba Distributing Co. Prior Wine Co. Quality wine & Spirits Co. Thorpe Distributing co. Tombstone Pizza Corp. Twin City Wine Co. Johnson Bros. Wholesale State Treas. MN. Void Day Distributing Co. Eagle Distributing Co. G & K Services Griggs, Cooper & Co. Intercontinental Pkg Co. Johnson Bros. Wholesale Old Dutch Foods, Inc. Minesota Bar Supply, Inc. Nelson Enterprises NSP Pogreba Distributing Co. Quality Wine & Spirits Co. Royal Crown Beverage Co. Twin City Wine Co. Coca-Cola Bottling MidWest Commissioner of Revenue City of Shorewood PAYROLL CHECK LIST PURPOSE Pumps Repaired Liquor Purchase~ Mise Purchases Cooler Repair Laundry Service Liquortwine Purchases- Liquor Purchases Wine Purchases Cigarette/Mise Purchases Beer Purchases Beer Purchases Utilities Shipping Exp~nse - Feb '86 Misc Purchases Pop Purchases Liquor/Wine Purchases Beer Purchases Wine Purchases Wine Purchases Beer Purchases Misc Purchases Wine Purchases Wine Purchases FICA - Josephson & Latterner '85 Void Beer/Misc. Purchases Liquor Purchases Laundry Service Liquor Purchases Wine Purchases Wine Purchases Misc Purchases Misc Purchases February Shipping Expense Utilities Beer/Mise Purchases Wine Purchases Pop Purchases Wine Purchases Pop Purchases Feb. '86 Sales Tax Reimburse Gen'l Fund for Payroll SUBTOTAL 200183 Russell R. Marron 80 hrs 200184 Robert F. Nash 22 hrs 200185 Christopher Schmid 39 hrs 200186 Donald Thara1son 30 hrs 200187 Stephen H. Thies 20 hrs 200188 John F.Thompson 12.5 hra . .~20g189..: ~::;:::~jfi~t~Q__Ji!:"~!~, .pll~Q~;~'o'-,~,~,,,,,,-ti:::_bI;::s;:~;;_,_.:.. ,CONTlNuED.'.ONtmXT AMOUNT 54.00 606.32 31.30 545.00 11.00 5,307.38 457.41 1,094.75 1,479.24 2,339.70 6,523.79 351. 78 152.50 49.98 266.30 1,058.00 1,394.35 549.49 1,087.00 4,021. 95 14.00 577.52 1,611. 93 359.43 0.0 1,859.05 1,791.13 48.80 772.80 521.73 1,043.09 67.95 89.45 78.00 214.46 1,769.55 91.54 32.30 79.25 311. 25 4,782.41 3,188.50 $ 46,685.38 438.03 100.10 139.93 130.27 85.20 53.13 :PAGE _ .. .. .... . ... ,. . -. .. __ . .. ">_ .\,1 Applicant j}J..:({;R.6'/ Firm Name ~ .eoS:3-rcvJA.J Business Address /0//0 3A)~6 . APPLICATION (under - .~ .. Residence Address . REm MAR 1 2 ,~tso CITY OF SHOREWOOD FOR REFUSE COLLECTOR LTCENSE City Ordinance No. 176) Date ~ ~'VJ~/O"--.J 3~~ 4vtS. N . ~NOV~XJ 5"S'''~ Telephone (Business) 5 J/I- /./6.5 (Home} 5"T"6-o06J.! Applicant hereby applies for a Refuse Collector License for a term of one year from January 1, 198b, to the following December 31, 19S]. Description of Motor /~ Vehicle(s) 7 Description of other equipment to be used in collection pplicant is sufficiently covered by an insurance policy against loss or injury to persons in the following amounts: 566 1.~tJJ!A ...Z6 &1Cii~rtJI~ ~~ .,., <JE:>#.... ! 3/11 ~ ~oo/) S'l>o, DO () each person injured Yes (~ No ( ) maximum coverage for each accident Yes (If) No ( ) SA .. . PAGE 2 --:_--~: -..~':-, -.....,..-'-- Are you the owner of the business? Yes y{ No ( ) If you have answered "no" to the above question, give owner's name Are you familiar with the prov~s~ons of Ordinance No. 176, an ordinance for the purpose of promoting the health and general welfare by regulating the keeping of garbage and regulating and lice~s}ng the conveying and hauling thereof in Shorewood? Yes V' No ( ) Type Type Type Type Type Type of of of of of of Service Service Service Service Service Service Charge Charge Charge Charge Charge Charge our services: W6t6Jc,,,'1-' /0 ~.. /~o . /2 ~ o,e/8~ /~. / The following is a schedule G~- 61J!.A,8t5- of charges for All refuse will be hauled and deposited at the following location(s): /? / ~ <IV -0 JC'J '-<-- F'Z.." ... A..J .5 l LO:.J.o 0 ~ La v 1-:$ 1./1 '-'<A!!'7 -- The refuse will be disposed of in the following manner: ~-I'VO ;s-i <-<- - I (we) hereby agree to operate the refuse collection business in accordance with the laws of the State or Minnesota and the ordinances of the City of Shorewood. The foregoing statements are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. SIGNATURE' FIRM NAME POSITION . . IICL U MAli 1 4 198~ CITY OF SHOREWOOD APPLICATION FOR REFUSE COLLECTOR LTCENSE (under City Ordinance No. 176) Date 3!J/Jek , , \ ) ApplicantJD {+ 1J 2:.c.J e::...0f}K(j Firm Name "C (:.. 5- -r ON k H 5. illlll rRlIt>;r) Business Address f~{/. [j':IX i.yt../ II..)HV;7/i'l'f: !jIIUIl, , iJ'3YJ- Residence Address Telephone (Business) 117.." - /:3 7(1 (Home) Applicant hereby applies for a Refuse Collector License for a term of one year from January 1, 198~, to the following December 31, 193'~ Description of Motor Vehicle(s) f!jJ8 ,JJ7f::.KJ()fl11(.')~/,q/...- l<f -1 Fe>~D Description of other equipment to be used in collection Applicant is sufficiently covered by an insurance policy against loss or injury to persons in the following amounts: $ :1'0. (n)6 / $660 I tot) I each person injured Yes ex) No ( ) maximum coverage for each accident Yes (;,() No ( ) against loss or damage to property Yes ('A) No ( ) '" YOUR INSURANCE POLICY FOR THE TERM OF THIS LICENSE MUST BE ATTACHED TO THIS APPLICATION V- A CHECK IN THE AMOUNT OF $30 MUST BE ATTACHED TO THIS APPLICATION AS THE FEE FOR THIS LICENSE. .0 . --~=PAG~ 2 Are you the owner of the business? Yes (X1 No ( ) If you have answered "no" to the above question, give owner's name Are you familiar with the prov~s~ons of Ordinance No. 176, an ordinance for the purpose of promoting the health and general welfare by regulating the keeping of garbage and regulating and licensing the conveying and hauling thereof in Shorewood? Yes (X) No ( ) The following is a schedule of charges for our services: Type of Service J\( j / vi N t uti. Type of Service Type of Service Type of Service Type of Service Type of Service Charge Y ) 5 {;; a: hC' rJ D . Charge Charge Charge Charge Charge All refuse will be hauled and deposited at the following location(s) : i...b01 \t{!<..,f. '-!j,IJ.P rt u.. 'yQ K[}flJi lA~60}) f-/1-I(t; I-tf.,/J{] ,- /LI~ L-~Rrrt 06 I The refuse will be disposed of in the following manner: t,':f-J0j) p/L.LINb I (we) hereby agree to operate the refuse collection business in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota and the ordinances of the City of Shorewood. The foregoing statements are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. FIRM NAME W!:.;j:T61J )(fI ,JflNI r /1 rtgN SIGNATURE ;)~ ~ POSITION 'O~. . . '<t:E~". ---~1.3 ,. CITY OF SHOREWOOD APPLICATION FOR REFUSE COLLECTOR LTCENSE (under City Ordinance No. 176) Firm Name Date 3./\\/~5 , ~ex-bf>ec- tv'\lAAA.~" C2.-Vv\.€,A,(1- , Business Address I ~Lt4 ~ ~~.l.,\;{\<"'yI\ll~N\.\'(~ J\l~L~( lUC.lS ~e.. - <;'0-0 (,,-C, e.. \ A~ €..It\. '^- €. S~) ,-, ~ S j,I/If'\J (").J...l.......q 12.. i 'v , Applicant Residence Address s s -~"1 S Telephone (Business) <2'-{0 ~- i \ 0 [) ( Home) Applicant hereby applies for a Refuse Collector License for a term of one year from January 1, 19~~ to the following December 31, 19~ -lQc.'~J (f I Description of other equipment to be used in collection Applicant is sufficiently covered by an insurance policy against loss or injury to persons in the following amounts: $ -5;o~oov $ 'S:-Qoo~ COD , each person injured Yes (i.1' No ( ) maximu~ coverage for each accident Yes (Vj No ( ) against loss or damage to property Yes (vJ' No ( ) ~YOUR INSURANCE POLICY FOR THE T~RM OF THIS LICENSE MUST BE ATTACHED TO THIS APPLICATION ~ A CHECK IN THE AMOUNT OF $30 MUST BE ATTACHED TO THIS APPLICATION AS THE FEE FOR THIS LICENSE. -$ -;ljJ.-fl~~.. '-~r ~____.b( ~d ~z.".h-~_ I / d .. . "PAGE 2 Are you the owner of the business? Yes ( ) No VI) If you have answered "no" to the above question, give owner's name WMte.. (v\~(.'-C\t'NVl"'M. -\- .t:'Nc... . Are you familiar with the provisions of Ordinance No. 176, an ordinance for the purpose of promoting the health and general welfar0e by regulating the keeping of garbage and regulating and licens'ng the conveying and hauling thereof in Shorewood? Yes ( ) No ( ) Type Type Type Type Type Type Charge Charge Charge Charge Charge Charge our services: . 0" ~ c / Ii I ~ - -7 1/ .- .....0"" " I.'I'T) U. .. / . L .I:u.~ I '~ U c:. The following is a schedule of of Service ~~. ~~ ~:~~~~:~1u-:~~{ of Service of Service of Service charges for All refuse will be hauled and deposited location(s) : (, i;>;:J~,'1[;lU~~:'~~ S'("/"'f" "- , at the following F~I/t'~ ~/o\.~j The refuse will be disposed of in the following manner: 1 tJ. Nt ,I hi Ii ~ ~_ , I (we) hereby agree to operate the refuse collection business in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota and the ordinances of the City of Shorewood. The foregoing statements are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. SIGNATURE' ~"" s~ e.... FIRM NAME POSITION '.' I. ;'-<'-,,,;..:,e;~:i'.~~t-""'-:Ioil CITY OF SHOREWOOD REc'a MAR 1 2 1986 APPLICATION FOR REFUSE COLLECTOR LTCENSE (under City Ordinance No. 176) Date ~h/19J~ Applicant ~ ~./..<J.oj;, Firm Name Q (Jj k-,~ . .a",_ . ~ a tJ G&JL .(}jf~; Business Addr~ss f470 #~ IL ~ '~ .,' Clw:vnAtJ.44I-~/h . ~ / .5-~:r3 / ,- A/)_~1I1 t Residence Address ~ Telephone (Business) 41.<./-11" I~j (Horne) 41.Jj- f..3/..t./ Applicant hereby applies for a Refuse Collector License for a term of one year from January 1, 19~, to the following December 31, 19ib Description Vehicle(s) Q 1J10 tuM ~ 0;1ld . It Y ~ qf~ (p;:;-' he uipment to be used,in I 7,f itadu~U :10 yd) I- Description collection Applicant is sufficiently covered by an insurance policy against loss or injury to persons in the following amounts: $ :;......oo,lJtJo each person injured Yes (v( No ( ) , $ .6'- 0 0. tJJtJ maximurry coverage for each accident / Yes (vT No ( ) agains~loss or damage to property Yes (\.If No ( ) . a/ YOUR INSURANCE POLICY FOR THE TERM OF THIS LICENSE ATTACHED TO THIS APPLICATION MUST BE / A CHECK IN THE AMOUNT OF $30 MUST BE ATTACHED TO THIS APPLICATION AS THE FEE FOR THIS LICENSE. r (}.w~~~A'~ tlo-rat:/IJ6 tW/.... ~ ~~ tJ-j~~ ~~~~ ~O-U~-~ "......,~ e. . - '--=:cc':'~:;'PAGE 2 Are you the owner of the business? Yes (I No ( ) If you have answered "no" to the above question, give owner's name Are you familiar with the prov~s~ons of Ordinance No. 176, an ordinance for the purpose of promoting the health and general welfare by regulating the keeping of garbage and regulating and licens~g the conveying and hauling thereof in Shorewood? Yes (vf No ( ) The following is a schedule of charges for our services: Type of Service U~ Type of Service G:rrmntFYLQIA-t..- tJ1JL Y Type of Service Type of Service Type of Service Type of Service Charge Charge Charge Charge Charge Charge 20. ~ ])t;l,.. .1140. -- 2.ot.1>, . All refuse will location(s) : b~ed ~nd deposited at the f?llowing W.uLt.f) ,~~ The refuse will be disposed of in the following manner: /~ 14; _;/~u~ I (we) hereby agree to operate the refuse collection business in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota and the ordinances of the City of Shorewood. The foregoing statements are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. POSITION ~ ~ I FIRM NAME SIGNATURE- - . . CITY OF SHOREWOOD APPLICATION FOR REFUSE COLLECTOR LTCENSE (under City Ordinance No. 176) Date 3-3-g(., .-. Appli.qan:t John tol. Trulson Firm Name Quality Waste Control, Inc. Business Address 1901 West l44th. St. Burnsville, Mn. 55337 Residence Address 14296 Rutoers St. Prior Lake. Mn. 55372 Telephone (Business) 435-3455 (Home) 445-8431 Applicant hereby applies for a Refuse Collector License for a term of one year from January 1, 19~, to the following December 31, 19~. Description of other equipment to be used in collection Applicant is sufficiently covered by an insurance policy against loss or injury to persons in the following amounts: $ ~ .)""0, 00 cl $ 35"'0, C!(JO I each person injured Yes ~ No ( ) maximu~coverage for each accident Yes (/) No ( ) agains~loss or damage to property Yes ('1 No ( ) V - ,--. YOUR INSURANCE POLICY FOR THE TERM O~THIS LICENSE MUST BE ATTACHED TO THIS APPLICATION V' A CHECK IN THE AMOUNT OF $30 MUST BE ATTACHED TO THIS APPLICATION AS THE FEE FOR THIS LICENSE. . . ~ ,--~ PAGE 2 Are you the owner of the business? Yes (/" No ( ) If you have answered "no" to the above question, give owner's name Are you familiar with the provisions of Ordinance No. 176, an ordinance for the purpose of promoting the health and general welfare by regulating the keeping of garbage and regulating and licens~g the conveying and hauling thereof in Shorewood? Yes (./) No ( ) The following is a schedule of charges for our services: Type of Service once a week service Charge Type of Service once a week serVl.ce Charge Type of Service Charge Type of Service Charge Type of Service Charge Type of Service Charge 10.00 ner month 114.00 per year All refuse will be hauled and deposited at the following location(s) : Louisville Landfill, Inc. 3331 Akers T.ane Jordan, Mn. 55352 The refuse will be disposed of in the following manner: Buried at Louisville Landfill I (we) hereby agree to operate the refuse collection business in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota and the ordinances of the City of Shorewood. The foregoing statements are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. FIRM NAME Quality Waste Control, Inc. SIGNATURR 4xJ4l ~c~ POSITION Office Manaaer . ""'" MAR 1 3 1986 CITY OF SHOREWOOD . APPLICATION FOR REFUSE COLLECTOR LTCENSE (under City Ordinance No. 176) Date 4101/<16 Applicant ~IJfP$e-j:;e/lP.4 Firm Name~fI)JJIIl!i--/i;ee/S JiJ...zL"~ ~L.sor~ Business Address ~ IJ. aX 1#0 111p1s, /JJ;; ~. $S ~() Residence Address Telephone (Business) ~4'/-~~q~ (Home) Applicant hereby applies for a Refuse Collector License for a term of one year from January 1, 19~, to the following December 31, 19~. , Description of ~2tor Vehicle (s) 1I.:f4Q /93'S- :Ii.Jr l vrq# 19?1? m~.e::. 'ItI~7t?()1 'I t/ /S902 7 Description of other equipment to be used in collection Applicant is sufficiently covered by an insurance policy against loss or injury to persons in the following amounts: $ ~ ()OO, OOiJ $ IIO(X)'vco each person injured Yes (v) No ( ) maxim~~coverage for each accident Yes (V) No ( ) against loss or damage to property Yes (v( No ( ) .,/ YOUR INSURANCE POLICY FOR THE TERM OF THIS LICENSE MUST BE ATTACHED TO THIS APPLICATION V- A CHECK IN THE AMOUNT OF $30 MUST BE ATTACHED TO THIS APPLICATION AS THE FEE FOR THIS LICENSE. Are you the owner of the business? Yes ( ) No (~ . . PAGE 2 If you name ove question, give owner's Are you familiar with the provisions of Ordinance No.- 176, an ordinance for the purpose of promoting the health and general welfar:t?b regulating the keeping of garbage and regulating and licensi the conveying and hauling thereof in Shorewood? Yes ( No ( ) The following is a schedule of charges for our services: Type of Service fas,.[)t7VT7A-a- Type of Service Type of Service Type of Service Type of Service Type of Service Charge Charge Charge Charge Charge Charge I/o. .. /mo. I The refuse will be disposed of in the following manner: '~{J ~Jd / I (we) hereby agree to operate the refuse collection business in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota and the ordinances of the City of Shorewood. The foregoing statements are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. SIGNATU POSITION . . . CITY OF SHOREWOOD MAYOR Robert Rascop COUNCI L Jan Haugen Tad Shaw Kristi Stover Robert Gagne ADMINISTRATOR Daniel J. Vogt 5755 COUNTRY- CLUB ROAD . SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 . (612) 474-3236 MEMO TO: Mayor and Councilmembers FROM: Dan Vogt DATE: March 19, 1986 SUBJECT: Cable Commission Appointment The Lake Minnetonka Cable Communication Commission is requesting that the Commission consist of one Councilmember and one resident. Council- member Shaw is our Council Representative. Mr. Dean Johnson of Cathcart Drive has expressed interest in being the Resident Representative. It is my recommendation to appoint Dean Johnson as the Resident Representative to the Lake Minnetonka Cable Communication Commission for Shorewood. DJV:ph A Residential Communitv on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore 513 /t . . / CITY OF SHOREWOOD MAYOR Robert Rascop COUNel L Jan Heugen Ted Shew Kristi Stover Robert Gagne ADMINISTRATOR Deniel J. Vogt 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD . SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 . (612) 474-3236 MEMO TO: Mayor and Councilmembers FROM: Dan vogtJf{f DATE: March 19~ 1986 SUBJECT: Shorewood Oaks Status Report As you are aware, staff has been negotiating a Development Agreement with the owner of the Shorewood Oaks Development for quite some time. The biggest hindrance in completing negotiations has been the issue of water. At this time, it appears as though even this issue is coming to a resolution. Let me bring you up to date. The developer, Mr. Dave Johnson, is interested in serving Shorewood Oaks with municipal water. This is possible by extending a watermain from the Boulder Bridge Farm municipal water system to Shorewood Oaks. This is a very costly endeavor. Also, the Development Agreement for the Boulder Bridge Farm Development requires a fee for each connection outside of the plat. This fee equals $2,000 per connection plus 8% interest from the completion date of the well in 1981. This fee would now be approximately $2,800 per connection. This issue has been the biggest negotiation hang-up. However, it now appears as though this issue has been resolved. The Shorewood Oaks developer has offered to pay the entire cost of the watermain to link the two developments in an amount of approximately $300~000. In return for this, there would be no connection fee per home paid to Boulder Bridge. This was then discussed with Mr. Tom Wartman of Boulder Bridge. Mr. Wartman indicated agreement as long as the City would amend his Development Agreement to allow a longer period of time to collect the connection fee. This fee provision is set to expire in June of 1988. Mr. Wartman would like to extend the connection fee an additional 10 years from the expiration date. Mr. Wartman also appears to be agreeable to reduce the connection fee amount so as to not discourage connections. The items discussed herein will require an amendment to the Boulder Bridge Farm Development Agreement. A draft amendment is being drawn for submittal to Mr. Wartman and subsequently to the City Council. Mr. Johnson of Shorewood Oaks would like to pay for the watermain as well as the street, turn lane off of Highway 7, and the curb and gutter for his project as a special assessment against the property. This is similar to the Waterford project of the past year. A petition accepting the entire cost of said improvements will be presented at your meeting of March 24. A Residential Communitv on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore 8 I . . Shorewood Oaks St~tus Report March 19, 1986 page two The cost of the improvements could be added on to the bond issue for the Southeast Area Trunk Water Project. If the Council is inclined to allow for the improvements to be bonded for and specially assessed by the City against the Shor~ Oaks Development under Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429, a resolution would need to be passed authorizing the City Engineer to prepare a Feasibility Report for the project. In the event that the project does not move forward, Mr. Johnson has agreed to accept any and all costs incurred by the City for the preparation of the Feasibility Report. Staff and Mr. Johnson will be prepared to discuss this issue further at your meeting of March 24. Please call if there are any questions prior to that date. DJV:ph cc: Glenn Froberg Jim Norton Brad Nielsen Dave Johnson Tom Wartman . . FEASIBILITY REPORT STREET REPLACEMENT, STORM SEWER AND APPURTENANT WORK PROJECT NO. 85-1 CITY OF SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA MARCH 18, 1986 I. TYPE OF WORK This work consists of the replacement of the existing street surface with a new bituminous pavement surface, and a rolled bituminous curb or concrete curb and gutter, whichever is selected. Also included in this project is the construction of approximately 4,300 feet of 12 inch through 42 inch storm sewer and appurte- nant work as shown on Sheet A. II. LOCATION The proposed project area is in the western portion of the City of Shorewood in Sections 31, 32 and 33 of Township 117N, Range 23 West, and includes property in the following described plats (also see attached map on Sheet A): Afton Meadows, Blocks 1, 2, 3, and 4 Lots 1, 2, 3 & 4 Minnewashta Acres Lot 10, Auditor Subdivision No. 247 & Wild Duck Second Addition III. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT Streets to be replaced with either 30 or 24 foot face to face bituminous streets are as follows: Afton Road from Cathcart Drive to Smithtown Road, Beverly Drive from Cathcart Drive to Cul-de-sac, Cajed Road from Beverly Drive to Smithtown Road, Cathcart Drive from W. 62nd Street to Smithtown Road, and Wedgewood Drive from Mallard Lane east to cul-de-sac. Included in this project is the construction of 1,000 lineal feet of storm sewer in Cajed Road from Beverly Drive to a Lake Minnetonka wetland outlet, and 3,300 lineal feet of storm sewer in Cathcart Drive from W. 62nd Street to a Lake Minnetonka wetland outlet. IV. FEASIBILITY From an engineering standpoint, this project is feasible and can be accomplished as proposed and does not have to be done in conjuncti on with another project. v. ESTIMATED COST The estimated project cost of the facilities are as outlined on the following pages. 033-3643 Page 1 1 \ A . A. STREET CONSTRUCTION (Does not Include Stonn Sewer) ALTERNATIVES Cathcart Drive, Cajed Road, Afton Road & Beverly Drive Concrete Curb & Gutter 30' F..F (9 Tons) Rolled Bituminous Curb 30' F ..F (9 Tons) Concrete Curb & Gutter 24' F ..F (9 Tons) Rolled Bituminous Curb 241 F..F (9 Tons) Concrete Curb & Gutter 24' F..F (7 Tons) Rolled Bituminous Curb 24' F..F (7 Tons) Concrete Curb & .Gutter 24' F ..F (4 Tons)*** Rolled Bituminous Curb 241 F..F (4 Tons)*** Wedgewood Drive Rolled Bituminous Curb 30' F..F (9 Tons) Including Sub..Drain System Rolled Bituminous Curb 30' F..F (7 Tons) Including Sub..Drain System Rolled Bituminous Curb 30' F..F (4 Tons)*** Including Sub..Drain System . Project Costs $813,600.00* $761,000.00* $426,900.00** $358,000.00** $378,300.00** $309,400.00** $352,900.00** $284,000.00** $117,000.00 $109,000.00 $107,000.00 These costs include sub..cutting the street 21 deep in case of bad materhl in the subgrade. (A sUbcutting cost of $342,000 is included in the project cost above.) These costs DO NOT include any costs for sub..cutting the street in case of bad material in the subgrade. Prior to final design of the streets, soil borings must be taken to verify if any subcutting may be necessary. * ** *** Minimum recommended street section, load carrying capability not numerically defined, approximates 4 ton design. NOTE: Project costs include 10% contingency and 27% indirect costs, and no ease.. ment costs are included in the above. B. Storm Sewer Construction Easements, Cajed Road, Cathcart Drive, Afton Road and Beverly Dri ve Project Costs $300,000.00 NOTE: Project costs include 10% contingency and 27% indirect costs. 033..3643 Page 2 . VI. PROPERTY TO BE ASSESSED . The properties to be assessed are those properties which abut the following streets: LOCATION Cathcart Dri ve Afton Road Caj ed Lane Beverly Drive Wedgewood Drive FROM West 62nd St reet Smithtown Road Smithtown Road Cul-de-Sac Mallard Lane TERMINUS Smithtown Road Cathcart Dri ve Beverly Dri ve Cathcart Dri ve East to Cul-de-Sac And located in the following section: The East 300 feet of the South 1/2, Section 31, Township 117, Range 23, lying southerly of Smithtown Road Also located in the following plats and sections: - Westlawn" II (Two) - Afton Meadows, Blocks 1, 2, 3, & 4 - Minnewashta Acres, Lots 1, 2, 3 & 4 - Lots 1 & 2, Minnewashta - Auditors Sub-Division No. 247, Lot 10 & all that part of the SW1/4 of Sec- tion 32, T 117, R 23, except R.L.S. No. 1064, Lot 10 Auditors Subdivision No. 247 and the plats of Afton Meadows, Minnewashta & Minnewashta Acres Also all that part of the following plat: Wild Duck Second Addition lying within Section 33, T 117, R 23 VII. ESTIMATED ASSESSMENTS A. Street Assessment (Does not include Storm Sewer or Wedgewood Drive) ESTIMATED FRONT FOOT ASSESSMENTS I I CONCRETE CURB IROLLED BITUMINOUSI & GUTTER I CURB I I I 24' 30' 24' I I 99.85* 52.39 93.40* 43.94 I I ------ 46.43 ------ 37.97 I I ------ 43.31 ------ 34.86 I I 9 Tons 7 Tons 4 Tons *Costs include sub-cutting the street 2' deep in the case of bad material. 033-3643 Page 3 . . B. Storm Sewer Assessment (Does not include street assessment or Wedgewood Dr.) Estimated Storm Sewer Project Costs $300,000.00 The area east of Cathcart Drive will require additional storm sewer facilities when development occurs. As a result, they derive only a partial benefit from this project. That partial benefit and partial assessment is as follows: Area East of Cathcart Drive (Partial Assessment) 1,703,200 Sq. Ft. @ $0.035/Sq. Ft. -59,612.00 $240,388.00 The storm sewer to be installed east of Cathcart Drive when development occurs will cost approximately $100,000. An additional $.06 per sq. ft. assessment east of Cathcart Drive will cover the $100,000 cost (1986 dollars). The area west of Cathcart Drive derives full benefit from this project. The esti- mated assessment is as follows: Area west of Cathcart Drive (Full Assessment) $240,388 + 2,542,632 Sq. Ft. = $0.095/Sq. Ft. Typical Lot Assessment Lot 6, Block 2, Afton Meadows a. Street Construction Concrete Curb & Gutter 24' F-F (9 Tons) 140' @ $51.46/Ft. = $ 7,334.60 b. Storm Sewer Construction 40,303 Sq. Ft. @ 0.095/Sq. Ft. ESTIMATED ASSESSMENT $ 3,828.79 $11,163.39 Wedgewood Drive Only Street Construction Including Sub-Drain ( Street Construction Including Sub-Drain ( Street Construction Including Sub-Drain ( 9 Tons ) 7 Tons ) 4 Tons ) PROJECT COSTS $117,000.00 $109,000.00 $107,000.00 I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my di rect supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of MjnneSO;)u~se !1~ '- ---- Date: March 18, 1986 Reg. No. 11606 033-3643 Page 4 SlREET REPlACEMENT PRWECT 85-1 (SlREET ro~1ROCTIOO OOL Y) CITY (F S!iRE\ffi) M4RCH 18, 1986 9 TOO 7 TOO 4 TOO COrrnrn: C & G roLLED BIT. Clm rorrnrn: C & G rolLED BIT. Clm rorrnrn: C & G rolLED BIT. Clm (".'()trnETE C & G rollED BIT. ClRB l) fT. F-F 30 FT. F-F 24' FT. F-F 24 FT. F-F 24 FT. F-F 24 FT. F-F 24 FT. F-F 24 FT. F-F . CAOCAAT mIVE $341,400* $319,400* $201 ,500** $171, g))** $179,100** $150,&xl** $167,100** $113,&xl** CAJED RQ\[) $129,CXXl* $120,CXXl* $ 62,700** $ 51,500** $ 57,500** $ 44,00)** $ 54, (XX)** $ 41,300** AFTOO RQ\D $156,100* $l48,fOO* $ 76,700** $ 65,00)** $ 68,200** $ 57,700** $ 63,700** $ 53,200** BE\ffiL Y mIVE $187,100* $173,CXXl* $ 86, (XX)** $ 68,00)** $ 73,fOO** $ 56,3D** $ 68,100** $ 50,~ lOTAL PROJECT CffiT $813,fOO* $761,CXXl* $426,m** $358,000** $378,3O()H' $309,400** $352, m** $284,000** * These costs include sukutting the street 2 deep in case of 1m IIBterial in the subgrade. ** These costs 00 NJT incluce any costs for sulrcutting the street in case of 1m IIBterial in the subgrade. . f()TE: tb easarent costs are included in the above. 033-3643 Page 5 1/1.---- ~I-- I I I I I I LAKE MINNETONKA (IJI'PER LAKE ) [ -j -1 i " ..___J :~:E; :ONSTRUCTlO~\l n . - - - - - - - - STORM SEWER CONSTRUCTION ,............................ STORM SEWER ............................. ............................. ............................. ASSESSABLE AREA Dr_ By: M. S. M. f""t"'f"'.. ORR. SCHELEN . MA YERON 0811 & ASSOCIATES. INC. 202\ USI IIEIIIIErllI AYE . SUI\( 23. ---- .... ___ MllIlIUrOllS, MlllllnOlA U41J . 1'11) 311-'''0 ~ OIV..... .. .... C_'AII".IIIC STREET REPLACEMENT, STORM SEWER AND APPURTENANT WORK PROJECT NO. 85-1 SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA c.... .... 033-3643 ~ ~ 1 INt.: arch 18, 1986 ...... .... A . Rotert W Je~liman, Jr. . KtL U MAt< .L l,.~r;a ATTORNEY AT LAW 30!5 EAST RICE STREET POST OFFICE BOX 387 WAVZATA. MINNESOTA !5!5S81 PHONE: (812) 473-7328 March 10, 1986 City of Shorewood ATTN: Daniel J. Vogt, Administrator 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, MN 55331 Dear Mr. Vogt: This will acknowledge receipt of your letter of January 8, 1986, to Mr. H. G. Murfin wherein you indicated that the City will voluntarily relocate its water main which crosses his property. Request the same be relocated within 10 days of receipt of this letter. Thank you for your cooperation. ----~~ /J I l~rJl cer-Z- . . Robert W. RWR:dl CC: H. G. Murfin Glenn Froberg, Esq. t2A . .OBERG & PENBERTHY, P.A. . . irrT=IrD"IW'1'"f!)~-AT LA W Glenn Frobe... James G. Penberthy Paul B. Ahern 17736 Excelsior Boulevard Minnetonka, Minnesota 55345 (612) 474-8877 REC'D MAR 1 4 1986 March 12, 1986 Robert W. Reutiman, Jr. Attorney at Law 305 East Rice Street P. O. Box 367 Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 Re: Horace G. Murfin Dear Bill: This is in response to your letter of March 10, 1986, concerning the relocation of the watermain crossing the property of your client, Mr. H. G. Murfin. After review of the project with our Public Works Department, it appears that the freeze will be out of the ground by April, so the City may commence the relocation project shortly thereafter. Once the project is commenced, it will be pursued for completion as early as possible. We anticipate that all work can be completed prior to June 1, 1986. . Thank you for your cooperation and understanding in this matter. Please call me should you have any questions concerning the above. GF:mbw Very tr~ly yours, / . ~~/ Gle~Fr~berg .~__Attorney for the City of Shorewood Enclosure cc: Dan Vogt "' . . NOTICE OF CLAIM IN ACCORDANCE WITH MINN. STAT. S466.05 (1976) TO: City Clerk of the City of Shorewood, 5755 County Club Road, Shorewood, MN 55331 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Robert Marshall, 4956 Three Points Boulevard, Mound, MinneoSota, hereby claims damages from the City of Shorewood in an amount greater than Fifty Thousand and no/100 Dollars ($50,000.00) by reason of personal injury sustained by Robert Marshall on the 22nd day of September, 1985, at approximately 12:30 a.m. when he was a passenger in a vehicle being driven westbound on Third Avenue approximately fifty feet west of its intersection with Christmas Lake Road, Shorewood, Minnesota; at said time and place, the vehicle in which Robert Marshall was a passenger collided with a large mound of dirt placed there by the City of Shorewood and its agents and employees. Said injuries and damages occurred as a result of the negligence of the City of Shorewood and its agents and employees in the improper maintenance and repair of said location. Dated this 11th day of March, 1986. /- SCH~BEL, GOET~, SIEBiN & HANSON, P.A. , \~'\, By I ~,( "" 'i " D~V'id J. Moskal (#123067) ATTORNEYS FOR ROBERT MARSHALL 5120 IDS Center Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 (612) 333-8361 1213 -..... ", uta Daniel J. gt City'Admin tr tor DJV:ph ee: Glenn Froberg Ene. AI Q..irl.",i.' r",","""ih' ,." , .."". Ui""".,"""..'" ,~"", ,f:h"WII -' . . ,/~\ - ~ ....~,~ o/~e 1 ~~ 4901 Manitou Road. Tonka Bay, Minnesota 55331 Tel. 474.7994 MAYOR Ruth Sherman March 18, 1986 COUNCIL Joanne Fagan L. H. Haug Douglas Keiler Lawrence Niccum Mayor Robert Rascop and Councilmembers City of Shorewood 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, MN 55331 Dear Mayor Rascop and Councilmembers: This letter is intended to serve as the response from the City of Tonka Bay to the Draft Agreement/South Lake Minnetonka Public Safety Department which was circulated to city officials on February 10, 1986, by the City of Shorewood. This draft proposal and the issue of future police protection for area municipali- ties was discussed at length on two separate occasions by the Tonka Bay City Council. Although the Council does not unanimously support anyone proposal, the following described concepts are supported by a majority of the Council. The City Council did not formally vote on any of the following items, but have indicated their informal support for the concepts contained herein and have directed me to respond on their behalf. There is one position Tonka Bay firmly maintains throughout all of these negotiations and that is a commitment to do everything within reason to keep the four-city department together. Section 4 - Governing Body The Tonka Bay City Council does not support the concept of a two-tiered committee system whereby the Coordinating Committee would deal with administrative affairs and a separate Finance Committee would vote on financial matters. It is our desire that a single Coordinating Committee function as the governing body appointed to act on both the administrative and financial affairs of the police department. The Council also does not support the concept of voting based on percentage of contribution. We are reluctant to yield any of the voting power that was granted when the original agreement was drafted and can only see our influence on the operation of the department declining in future years under this system. On the other hand, we can understand your concern that your influence/control over police department expenditures should be somewhat proportionate to the level of funding you provide. As a compromise to this difference on voting/ representation, a majority of the Tonka Bay City Council is willing to grant Shorewood a second vote on the Coordinating Committee. This additional vote would be vested in your single representative, whereby the three smaller cities' representatives each have one vote and the Shorewood representative has two votes. The Counci~ discussed.. the issllegf a second representative from Shorewood to carry the :second -~ote,=but cno:agr.eement~:gc:::ri!aclled~c--:::::c:::::c;,.,,; \'20 . . Mayor Rascop and Councilmembers March 18, 1986 Page 2 The consensus of our Council is that the granting of a second vote is an equitable compromise on both the two-tier commit~ee &yQtem and the percentage-based voting. The concept of a split-function committee with administrative votes weighted on a one-vote-per-city basis and financial vot~q weighted on a percentage-of-budget basis is easy to accept in theory, but would-- be difficult to implement in a practical setting. The relationship of finance tu-policy is such that any proposed separation of the committee's legislative function would most certainly lead to an ongoing struggle over the role of the two separate committees. Section 7 - Financial Matters/Demand Formula The Tonka Bay City Council supports the concept of phasing in a payment formula based on demand, as outlined in Section 7, Subdivision 2 of your proposal. We feel that the annual dollar contribution schedule proposed, which combines a decreasing percentage of formula with an increasing percentage of demand over a five (5) year period, should be adopted as long as demand is based on hours of labor and not on the number of calls to which the department responds. We also agree with the stipulation contained in the Administrative Review of Proposals, drafted by Excelsior, that Excelsior not receive a reduced percentage of contribution for serving as the area's "downtown." We feel that the location of the new facility in Excelsior will deter local crime and reduce the time required to respond to calls within the Excelsior city limits and that this is a large advantage in itself. Section 7 - Financial Matters/Control of Budget A majority of the Tonka Bay City Council support the concept in the Shorewood proposal that "the maximum annual budget shall be set by each city determining the number of dollars it proposes to pay for police protection." We feel that each city must have adequate control of its portion of the police budget. In regards to the August 15th budget approval date, we would recommend that this date be moved back to September 1st each year before being required to continue at the previous year's contribution level. This would give each Council, administrators, the police chief and the Coordinatin, Committee an additional 15 days to review and approve the police budget during this hectic time of the year. Section 8 - Duration The Council does not support the concept of a five (5) year contract with any party being able to withdraw from the agreement by filing notice by August 1st of that year, as outlined in Subdivision 1. The Tonka Bay Council feels that the agreement should be for a minimum of ten (10) years, and preferably fifteen (15) years. We are in general agreement with the Administrative Review of Proposals that all four (4) cities should be required to sign a lease agreement for the new Excelsior police facility which would run concurrently with the term of all bonds sold for the development and construction of the building. . . Mayor Rascop and Councilmembers March 18, 1986 Page 3 Conclusion While the Tonka Bay City Council can~ot accept the Shorewood proposal as it is now written, there are several areas where our municipalities are in agreement including the phasing in of the demand formula and control over budget expenditures by each city L._ Areasaf...the prDposal > .which-ara.no.t.acc.e.p.tahle to us include the two-tier committee system, voting based on percentage ofcgntribution, and a five (5) year contract agreement. A majority of our Council feel that giving Shorewood.two.voteson.asingle coordinating committee in exchange for a 10-15 year commftme-nt is an equitable compromise. A majority of our Council support the concepts, recommendations or "ingredients of a workable agreement" contained in the administrators' review and feel they merit further investigation. We are certainly aware that all four cities are not in agreement and would'-prefer.an alternative that was acceptable to everyone. This response should indicate to you our willingness to be flexible and to try and address some of your concerns for the long term benefit of the continuation of a highly regarded public safety department. It is our desire that all four (4) cities continue to communicate with one another until an agreement is reached that reasonably satisfies both the large and the small cities. No one city will benefit by disbanding the current department and investing our resources in smaller departments. Let's all work and cooperate together to make a true compromise a reality for the benefit of all South Lake Minnetonka residents. If you have any comments or questions, I would be happy to respond to them at your convenience. Regards, " ' '- \ , ~S~\~~\~~~~ Kirk City City C. McDonald Administrator of Tonka Bay cc: City Council II . . ~@ The I Minnelonka Bank 411 WATER STREET P. O. BOX 417 EXCELSIOR, MINNESOTA 55331-0417 PHONE (612) 474-5981 March 14, 1986 Mayor Robert Rascop 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, MN 55331 Dear Mayor Rascop: As you recall, our bank and the Wayzata Bank have sponsored a foot race between the two institutions for the last several years. Race entry fees have been donated to lake area organizations, the principal benefactor being Lake Minnetonka Conservation Districts Save the Lake fund. This years addition of the Easy Race is scheduled for April 27th. Its route through Shorewood is the same as previous years, County Road 19. The field will be limited to 650 runners. The principal beneficiary again will be Save the Lake fund. As was done in past years, a portion of the entry fees will also be divided among the Crime Prevention funds (or their equivalents) of the various Police departments assisting in the execution of the race. As we have done in past years, we would like to request your councils approval of this event. Please let me know at your convenience. Your help is greatly appreciated. Sincerely, ~~IJ~ Kenneth D. Brooks Commercial Loan Officer KDB/kee I nr~tirm<: in F"r,.I.<:inr ~nrl .~hnr,.wnnrl ,t:;hnnninn r,.nt,.r \2F , . . MA YOR, Robert Rascop COUNCIL Jan Haugen Tad Shaw Kristi Stover Robert Gagne CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD . SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 . (6121 474-3236 April 10, 1985 Mr. David B. Boies Senior Vice President and Trust Officer The Wayzata Bank & Trust Company 900 East Wayzata Boulevard Wayzata, Mn. 55391 Dear Mr. Boies: Your request to run this year's Easy Race through parts of the City of Shorewood on April 28 was unanimously approved by the Shorewood City Council at its meeting held on Monday, April 8, 1985. We are happy to see proceeds of the race being donated to lake area organizations. If I can be of further assistance to you, let me know. Sincerely, CITY OF SHOREWOOD Daniel J. Vogt City Administrator DJV:rd A Rp~irlpntilfl Cnmmunrtv nn Llj..p MinllPtonka's South Shore ~D'<+ . ,\ . ~~ .:: ~;~~~$ ~ED O\~ . ~MAR20_ "i"n.n.." ......n...ftA. MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT P.O. Box 387, Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 BOARD OF MANAGERS: David H. Cochran, Pres. . Albert L. Lehman . John E. Thomas Camille D. Andre . James B. McWethy . James R. Spensley . Richard R. Miller March 18, 1986 Mr. Daniel Vogt City Administrator City of Shorewood 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, MN 55331 Re: 1986 Waterway Maintenance and Repair Fund Dear Mr. Vogt: On behalf of the Board of Managers, thank you for submitting a proposal for projects applicable to the above Fund. The Managers reviewed all proposals submitted by municipalities and made allocations from the 1986 Fund at the March 13, 1986 meeting.. We regret to advise you that your project was not approved for funding. It is hoped that you will submit other project proposals in the future. Requests for proposals for the 1987 Fund will be forwarded to you near the end of 1986. Very truly yours, EUGENE A. HICKOK AND ASSOCIATES Engineers for the District /%/J 1//2 Michael A. Panzer, P.E.~ kh cc: Board G. Macomber S. Stewart lZG