The URL can be used to link to this page

041486 CC Reg AgP ~ . CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MONDAY, APRIL 14, 1986 AGE N D A CALL TO 'ORDER -A. Pledge of Allegiance B. Roll Call APPROVAL OF MINUTES Mayor A. Regular Council Minutes - March 24, 1986 (Att #1 - Minutes) 2. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR A. Q tJ G-: (J'V. r;fJ' ~-p.jt rJ B. 3. PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT A. B. 4. PARK COMMISSION REPORT A. Christmas Lake Access Recommendation .. COUNCIL CHAMBERS 5755 COUNTRY CLUB RD 7:30 PM Haugen Shaw Stover Gagne Rascop ~ ~ 1/ (Att #4A - Park Commission Minutes) B. -1- ; ., . COUNCIL AGENbA MONDAY, APRIL 14, 1986 page two 5. CONSENT AGENDA A. Finance Committee Appointment Introduction of David Lawrence to Council B. Board of Review set for May 22nd 1986 - 7:30 PM (Att #5B - Notice) C. Cigarette License - Skipperette - new applicant - James Pyle (to be added to Resolution #6-86) (Att #5C - Application) D. Non-intoxicating Malt Off Sale License - Skipperette ( To be added to Resolution #37-85) (Att #5D - Application) E. Garbage Collectors License - Gopher State Trucking (To be added to Resolution #16-86) (Att #5E - Application) F. Swimming Pool Permit Applicant: Warren Olson Location: 23820 Yellowstone Trail (Att #5F - Planner's Memo) G. Permanent Appointment - Kathleen Schwankl (Att #5G - Memo) 'H. Corridor Study Payment (Att #5H - Memo) I. Weed Spraying Quote (Att #51 - Memo & Quote) Moved Seconded Vote -2- . COUNCIL AGENDA MONDAY, APRIL 14, 1986 page three . 6. SMITHTOWN CIRCLE - REQUEST FOR IMPROVEMENT Refer to Packet of March 24, 1986 7. SIMPLE SUBDIVISION AND LOT AREA VARIANCE Applicant: Location: Wallace King 25620 Birch Bluff Road (Att #7 - Staff Report) 8. SETBACK VARIANCE Applicant: Location: David Haskins 5472 Carrie Lane (Att #8 - Staff Report) 9. &IMPLE SUBDIVISION Applicant: Location: Warren Olson 5600 Grant Lorenz Road (Att #9 - Staff Report) 10. PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLAT Applicant: Location: Harding Acres 2nd Addition Wedgewood Drive (Att #10 - Staff Report) 11. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND VARIANCES Christmas Lake Access Merry Lane (Att #11 - Staff Report) 12. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND VARIANCE TO EXPAND A NONCONFORMING STRUCTURE Applicant: Baylon Leiferman Location: 5775 Grant Lorenz Road (Att #12 - Staff Report) -3- . , , COUNCIL AGEND1\ MONDAY, APRIL 14, 1986 page four 13. SIMPLE SUBDIVISION AND VARIANCES \ Applicant: Location: Meloche/Bauman 26120/26140 Birch Bluff Road (Att #13 - Staff Report) 14. PLANNER'S REPORT A. Tingewood - Request for Reinstatement of P.U.D. Applicant: James Harmsen (Att #14 - Planner's Report) B. 15. ENGINEER'S REPORT A. Cathcart Area Proposed Project Discussion (Refer to packet of March 24, 1986) B. Shorewood Oaks Feasibility Report (Att #15B - Feasibility Report) C. SE Area Water Status Report D. 16. ATTORNEY'S REPORT A. Naegele Stipulation Review B. 17. ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT A. Police Department Discussion (Att #17A - Staff Memo) B. County Fair Donation Request (Att #17B - Letter) C. Public Works Union Update (Att 17C - Staff Memo) 4- --~ ~~J~....-. 1,," ~ ..;.;t~--~1Ii4'- .." ,,".~- , , ri. , CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MONDAY, MARCH 24, 1986 COUNCIL CHAMBERS 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD 7:30 P.M. M I NUT E S CALL TO ORDER Acting Mayor Stover called the regular Council Meeting of Monday~ ~ March 24, 1986, to order in the Shorewood Council Chambers at 7:30 P.M. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Acting Mayor Stover opened the meeting with the Pledge of All~giance and a prayer. ROLL CALL Present: Acting Mayor Stover, Councilmembers Haugen and Gagne. Absent: Mayor Rascop and Councilmember Shaw (vacation). Staff: Attorney Penberthy, Engineer-Norton, Administrator Vogt - and Deputy Clerk Niccum. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Gagne moved, Haugen seconded, to approve the minutes of the regular Council Meeting of March 10, 1986 as amended on pages 3 and 4. Motion carried - 3 Ayes. PARK COMMISSION REPORT ~::~:~:::a~~Ev~~~E::commended that the Christmas L~ce~ discussion be deferred until the Cou~cilMeeting 04.A~;il/4, }986 SILVERWOOD PARK/LOAN PAYOFF TO SEWER FUND ~ Gagne moved, Haugen seconded, to accept the Park Commission ~ecommendation to repay the loan in the amount of $20,000, plus any interest due to the Sewer Fund. The money is to be paid out of the Park Capital Improvement Fund. (This money was borrowed in June, 1985, to pay for "Silverwood Park"). Motion carried - 3 Ayes. CONSENT AGENDA GARBAGE COLLECTORS LICENSES Haugen moved, Gagne seconded, to remove Garbage Collectors Licenses from the Consent Agenda - Motion carried - 3 Ayes. CABLE COMMISSION APPOINTMENT Dean Johnson - 5875 Cathcart Drive. Haugen moved, Gagne seconded, to approve the Consent Agenda. Motion carried - 3 Ayes. -1- . . REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING - 2 - MARCH 24, 1986 GARBAGE COLLECTOR'S I,ICENSES RESOLUTION NO. 21-86 Haugen moved, GaOgneseconded, _~p approve the following Garbage Collector's Licenses: - 1. B.F.I. (Browning-Ferris-Industries) 02. Crosstown Sanitation 3~ Quali-ty Waste- Control---"'" 4. R & W Sanitation 5. Waste Management 6. Westonka Motion carried by roll call vote - 3 Ayes. TEMPORARY SIGN PERMIT Lakeshore Equipment Sales - 19285 State Highway #7 Planner Neilsen explained that Lakeshore Equipment Sales erected a blinking sign and banner without applying for a permit. He told them to remove both signs and they have done so. They have also put up 2 docks, a canopy and a trailer for display purposes. Haugen moved, Gagne seconded to approve the temporary sign permit pr,oviding that: 1. All docks, canopies, and trailers being displayed outside be removed and, 2. Contingent upon the Planner's recommendation that the permit be granted for seven (7) days only. Motion carried - 3 Ayes. S.E. AREA TRUNK WATER STATUS REPORT Administrator Vogt said Mike Pflaum of Near Mountain and Robert Mason of Waterford are still negotiating and are close to a solution relative to obtaining the final petition. Councilmember Haugen asked what the last date is that they can get project costs on the 1987 assessment roll and Administrator Vogt replied October 10th, 1986. , Co~ncilmember Gagne mentioned that wintertime costs would be much higher. SHOREWOOD OAKS DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT/WATER REQUEST STATUS REPORT Administrator Vogt said they are close to a decision on the Develop- ment Agreement, the finalization of it depends on the water situation He sent a copy of the petition to Mr. Johnson in the hospital. Engineer Norton said a cost not to exceed $300,000 is a safe figure. He also said they are now working in the Shorewood Oaks Developmemt~ Administrator Vogt said Shorewood Oaks water can be part of the S.E. water bond issue. He has talked to the bonding consultant who said it would not be a problem to combine the two. ' . . REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING - 3 - MARCH 24,1986 SHOREWOOD OAKS DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (CONTINUED) -:-.. The City of Shorewood and Mr. Tom Wartman of Boulder Bridge are ,negotiating on a time extension as well aa other possible changes '._, in the Development Agreement for Boulder Bridge Farm. RESOLUTION NO. 22-86 Haugen moved, Gagne seconded, that a Resolution be prepared directing the City Engineer to prepare a Feasibility Report on the water main, streets, curb and gutter, and the Highway #7 turn-off lane with the understanding that the developer of Shorewood Oaks has agreed to pay the costs. Motion carried - 3 Ayes. Haugen moved to table further discussion on the Shorewood Oaks until a full Council is present, Gagne seconded the motion. Motion carried - 3 Ayes. PLANNING REPORT Near Mountain Development Agreement Status Report Planner Niels~ said the Council may 'see a draft Development Agreement at their next meeting if all of the details can be worked mute Smithtown Circle - Petition for Public Improvement Tl}~E"suba:i:v4--&~ezoning an..d.p.latting, was approved on 1979. A ett r of creS!~s receivedapdthe park fees were paid. The equa lzation charges still have to be made. The owner is requesting that ,the City consider bonding for the improvements and assessing the costs back to the property so that the owner can get a building permit. Mr. Steve Plowman appeared to discuss having a Feasibility Report done. The Council informed him that it would be at his cost and risk, because at this time they can't quarantee bonding. He also asked if there was anything he can do to expedite things. The Couqcil suggested he gather and present some background information, ~uch as why the project didn't go forward in 1979, and send this information to the City. Plannp.I' Nielsen also suggested that he get going on the title opinion. Haugen moved, Gagne seconded, to table the issue until a full Council is present. Motion carried - 3 Ayes. Brom' s Market Planner Nielsen mentioned that "Brom's Market" is displaying signs of reopening. He will write a letter to Mr. Mason and Mr. Cirpinski stating that there may be some concern over re- opening the market, that the issue will be discussed at the next meeting, and that one member of the Council showed concern over health problems in connection with themotorhome on the property. -3- / . . REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING -4- MARCH 24, 1986 ATTORNEY'S REPORT Nephew Law Suit Update Attorney Penberthy said Attorney Froberg has contacted our insurance company and informed them that the City is considering putting in a storm sewer for the entire area. Administrator Vogt said the 1984 cost for that area was $64,000. Nephew's insurance company wishes to settle out of court and wants the City to put in a tile line. ENGINEER'S REPORT Cathcart Area Proposed Project Engineer Norton said the reason for high cost on the Nephew property is because there is a 30" - 36" pipe going through this area. The total estimated storm sewer cost is $300,000. *Correction: Feasibility Report - page four Typical Lot Assessment Lot 6, Block 2, Afton Meadows a. Street Construction Concrete Curb & Gutter 24' FF (9 Tons) 140' @ $52.39 Haugen suggested they discuss the Feasibility Report when the whole Council is present. J Sewer Request - Craig Kouba - 3520 State Highway 7 Engineer Norton was contacted by Mr. Kouba, who owns a house in Chanhassen that was moved there as part of the preliminary work done for the Shorewood Oaks Development. The sanitary sewer and service has to come through Shorewood and the Shorewood Oaks project. Sewer service was installed in January. Gagne moved, Stover seconded, to accept Engineer Norton's recommend- ation to hook up Mr. Kouba's home at 3520 State Highway 7 to Shore- wood sewer service and allow occupancy. Motion carried - 3 ayes. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT Murfin Le-t ter A letter was received from Mr. Murfin's Attorney, Robert W. Reutiman, Jr., and dated March 21, 1986, whereby Mr. Murfin stood by the letter sent to Shorewood by him on March 10, and stated that Mr. Murfin expects a reasonable reimbursement of $50 a day for everyday after March 19, 1986, until the water main is removed. -4- . REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING . -5- MARCH 24, 1986 ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT continued Murfin Letter continued Attorney Penberthy said Mr. Murfin has to show damage to warrant $50 daily from March 19th on. Haugen moved, Gagne seconded, to have Administrator Vogt do whatever is necessary to remove the pipe and put City Hall and the Public Works Garage on the Badger Water System. Motion carried - 3 ayes. Robert Marshall - Notice of Claim Administrator Vogt informed the Council that Robert Marshall is considering a law suit with the City because he ran into a dirtpile in the ditch off of 3rd Avenue. Vogt has informed our i~surance company of the possible claim. Temporary Secretary Position Discussion Administrator Vogt said a "Kelly Girl" has been hired temporarily from 12:30 to 5:00 PM to cover for Patti Helgesen due to medical problems relating to her pregnancy. An ad has been placed for a full-time temporary person while Patti is gone. Councilmember Stover said she hoped the Receptionist/Secretary could become a permanent position. Administrator Vogt asked what pay to offer. The Council said up to the midpoint of $5.50 per hour. Response to Police Department Draft Contract Haugen moved, Gagne seconded, to table the response until a full Council is present to do the appropriate work. Motion carried - 3 ayes. A special meeting is set for April 7, 1986 at 7:00 to discuss the issue. Proceeding with Public Works Equipment Purchase Administrator Vogt said that replacement of the 1976 Ford is in the budget and they are now proceeding with specs to take bids. Race Routing Approval Request Gagne moved, Haugen seconded, to recommend approval of the Easy Race on April 27, 1986, and that AdministratorVogt send a letter of approval. Motion carried - 3 ayes. Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Maintenance and Repair Fund The Shorewood request for funding to alleviate the Eureka Road drainage problem was denied. Nine applications were received, four were funded. Out of $160,000 requested, $31,000 was avail- able. Richfield and the Minneapolis Park Board received the majority. -5- .. . . REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING "'.' .6 - - MARCH 24, 1986 ADMINISTRATIVE /REPORT continued Corridor Study Administrator Vogt attended a meeting on the Corridor Study. They showed videos and the Vine Hill Intersection was given #1 priority ,as the.worst problem on the corridor. He also said we have received a bill for $5000 for our share of the study. A report and recommendation as to paYment of the bill will be presented at a future meeting. BURNED OUT BUILDING - 5580 COUNTY. ROAD 19 Councilmember Gagne showed concern for the dangerous state of the building, afraid someone might get hurt. Planner Nielsen said' the insurance company is involved in a contra- versy, and the Fire Department will not tear the building down until the cause of the fire is determined. An electrical test has to be done and it costs a lot of money. Council asked the City Attorney to check and see if the City can p~y the cost and assess it back. to the property. Councilmember Gagne also mentioned the general appearance of the area, referring to the cars at "Limefire" and the trailers at "Driskills". FINANCE COMMITTEE The Auditor and the Finance Committee will be present at the April 28, 1986, meeting to review the Audit Report for 1985. MAYOR'S REPORT none COUNCIL REPORT none APPROVAL OF CLAIMS AND ADJOURNMENT Haugen moved, Gagne seconded, to adjourn the regular Council meeting of March 24, 1986 at 9:35 PM subject to approval of claims. Motion carried - 3 ayes. General Fund 00-00166-2 Checks # 31842 - # 31886 Checks # 200195 - # 200209 = = $ 84,461.24 7,884.35 '$ 92,345.59 Total -6- . ,?~;1 '!' .~ ;c'd,;>", :,~~(\l!;j; . ';-,~J~ , . CHECK NO 31842 31843 31844 31845 31846 31847 31848 31849 31850 31851 31852 31853 31854 31855 31856 31857 31858 31859 31860 31861 31862 31863 31864 31865 31866 31867 31868 31869 31870 31871 31872 31873 31874 31875 31876 31877 31878 31879 31880 31881 31882 31883 31884 31885 31886 . . GENERAL FUND - BILLS PAID SINCE MARCH 19, 1986 TO \-lHOM PAID MN City Management Assoc. Minnegasco MAMA AmeriData Systems, Inc. AT&T Consumer Prod. AT&T Information Sys. Bob's Personal Coffee Rolf E.A. Erickson Hennepin Cty Treas. Jim Hatch Sales Co., Inc. Labor Relations Assoc. H.C. Mayer & Sons, Inc. Metropolitan Waste Comm. Midwest Mailing Sys. Miller/Davis Co. Minnegasco Minnesota Mutual Life. NSP NWB Perry's Truck Repair PHP Judy Quaas SLMPSD Transport Parts, Inc. Waste Management - Savage Orr-Schelen-Mayeron Construction Bookstore City of Mound PERA Robert Rascop Jan Haugen Tad Shaw Robert Gagne Kristi Stover State Treas. Soc. Sec. The Minnetonka Bk. Commissioner of Revenue ICMA Retirement Corp. City-County Credit Union AFSCME LOCAL #224 Minnegasco City of Excelsior Daniel J. Vogt Petty Cash Westonka Plbg & Heating PURPOSE AMOUNT 35.00 352.74 5.00 300.00 13.05 8.08 47.35 1,566.66 247.50 102.06 65.00 27.00 18,660.77 58.44 42.00 824.43 169.39 2,014.35 351.15 161.25 2,321.77 87.50 23,937.83 17.60 74.00 3,061.25 J 46.30 956.63 1,096.64 150.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 1,900.80 1,572.45 699.50 263.00 42.00 41. 22 98.09 22,531.00 23.94 46.55 41. 95 $ 84,461. 24 Annual Membership Fee Boulder Bridge Pump Hse Membership Dues 1986 Utility Billing Training Telephone Service - Garage Telephone Service - City Hall Coffee, Tea, Filters, Etc.- City Hall March, 1986 Assessing Fee Board & Room - Prisoners Small Tools, Flags Union Discussions Public Works - General Supplies Sewer Service Charges Maintenance - Postage Meter Personnel Record Forms Utilities- Badger Pump Hse/City Garage Employee Life Ins. - April, 1986 City-wide Electricity Telephone Serv.-City Hall/Garage Repair Frame- Truck #3 Employee Health Insurance - April '86 Cleaning City Hall April, 1986 Budget Truck Maintenance #24 Public Works - Garbage Removal Engineer Fees/S.E. Water/Cathcart St. Code Books 2nd Qtr. '86 Fire Contract March 29, '86 Payroll - PERA April '86 Mayor's Salary " "Council Salary " " " " " " " " " " " " March 29, '86 Payroll - FICA March 29, '86 Payroll - FWH March 29, '86 Payroll - SWH ICMA Deductions - March 29, '86 Credit Union Deductions - 3/29/86 March 29, '86 Union Dues Utilities - Knightsbridge Rd. 1st & 2nd Qtr. Fire Contract '86 Mileage - F~b. & March '86 Reimburse Petty Cash - Misc Expense Reimburse for 2nd Pumbing Permit SUBTOTAL. . . GENERAL FUND - BILLS PAID SINCE MARCH 19, 1986 CHECK NO TO WHOM PAID PAYROLL CHECK LIST 200195 200196 200197 200198 200199 200200 200201 200202 200203 200204 200205 200206 200207 200208 200209 Void Void Daniel J. Vogt Sandra L. Kennelly Susan A. Niccum Evelyn T. Beck Kathleen G. Schwankl Bradley J. Nielsen Patricia R. Helgesen Charles S. Davis Dennis D. Johnson Daniel J. Randall Howard Stark Ralph A. Wehle Donald E. Zdrazil PURPOSE Void Void 80 hrs 80 hrs 80 hrs 80 hrs 80 hrs 80 hrs 80 hrs 80 hrs 80 hrs 80 hrs 82 hrs 82 hrs 80 hrs SUBTOTAL TOTAL AMOUNT 0.0 0.0 857.68 611.49 450.44 687.30 463.86 718.16 527.61 541.63 581. 54 581. 54 564.85 518.08 780.17 $ 7,884.35 $ 92,345.59 CHECK NO 4469 4470 4471 4472 4473 4474 4475 4476 4477 4478 4479 4480 4481 4482 4483 4484 4485 4486 4487 4488 4489 4490 4491 4492 4493 4494 4495 4496 4497 4498 4499 4500 4501 4502 4503 4504 4505 4506 4507 4508 4509 4510 4511 4512 4513 4514 4515 4516 4517 4518 4519 4520 . . LIQUOR FUND - BILLS PAID SINCE MARCH 19, 1986 TO WHOM PAID Bellboy Corporation Eagle Distributing Co. Griggs, Cooper & Co., Inc. Intercontinental Pkg Co. Johnson Bros. Wholesale Mn Suburban Newspapers North Star Ice Ed Phillips & Sons Prior Wine Co. Quality Wine & Spirits Twin City Wine Co. Ken Jarcho Ins. Agency City of Shorewood MN Mutual Life Ins. PHP Harry Niemela AT&T Consumer Prod. BellBoy Corporation Eagle Distributing Co. Grigg, Cooper & Co., Intercontinental Pkg Co. Jude Candy & Tobacco Johnson Bros Wholesale Minnesota Bar Supply, Inc. NSP NWB Ed. Phillips & Sons Prior Wine Co. Quality Wine & Spirits Co. Ryan Properties, Inc. Twin City Wine Co. Waste Management - Savage Russell R. Marron City of Shorewood PERA City of Shorewood AT&T Communications Safety/Security 3M Butch's Bar Supply CRS Day Distributing Co. Eagle Distributing Co. East Side Beverage Co. Griggs, Cooper & Co. Intercontinental Pkg Co. Johnson Bros. Wholesale Minnegasco Minnesota Bar Supply Minnesota Suburban News. Mn Victoria Oil Co. Nelson Enterprises Old Dutch Foods, Inc. PURPOSE Liquor Purchases " " " " Wine Purchases " " Advertising Mise Purchases Wine/Liquor Purchases Wine Purchases Wine/Liquor Purchases Wine Purchases Liquor Liability Audit March 5, 1986 payroll reimb. April '86 Employee Life Ins. Employee Health Ins. - April '86 April '86 Rent Store I Telephone Service Liquor Purchases II " " " Wine Purchases Cigarette/Mise Purchases Wine Purchases Mise Purchases Utilities - Store I Telephone Service Wine Purchases Wine Purchases Wine/Pop Purchases April '86 Rent Store II/Fixtures Wine Purchases Garbage Removal Mileage - March '86 Bookkeeping Expense - Jan '86 Interest-Susan Latterner - Aug. '85 Reimburse payroll - March 29 '86 Telephone Service Burglar Alarm SVC Mise Purchases Offic Supplies Beer/Mise Purchases Liquor/Wine Purchases Beer Purchases Liquor Purchases Wine Purchases Wine Purchases Utilities Mise Purchases Advertising Utilities Shipping Expense Mise Purchases AMOUNT 814.20 2,268.01 618.33 311.53 671. 94 67.74 22.05 618.76 702.17 1,522.79 657.35 99.00 3,263.52 35.29 310.64 882.50 21. 66 1,140. 72 2,500.06 651. 82 355.16 231. 23 2,099.14 15.00 243.39 13 7.88 171.67 634.54 435.41 1765.00 143.23 90.00 18.90 148.48 5.00 3,238.98 .30 227.55 117 . 15 37.56 1,216.95 3,310.43 1,922.70 1,857.42 847.64 1,~98.56 291.18 186.93 233.78 122.40 232.50 45.66 CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE....................... . . . LIQUOR FUND - BILLS PAID SINCE MARCH 19, 1986 CHECK NO TO WHOM PAID 4521 4522 4523 4524 4525 4526 4527 Pepsi Cola Bottling Co. Ed.Phi11ips & Sons Co. Pogreba Distributing Prior Wine Co. Quality Wine & Spirits Thorpe Distributing Co. Twin City Wine Co. PAYROLL CHECK LIST 200210 200211 200212 200213 200214 200215 200216 200217 200218 200219 200220 200221 Russell R. Marron Robert F. Nash Christopher Schmid Donald Thara1son Stephen H. Thies John F. Thompson William F. Josephson Susan M. Latterner Steven D. Maeger Christopher J. Meyer Dean H. Young Joel S. Bovee PURPOSE AMOUNT Pop Purchases Wine/Liquor Purchases Beer/Pop Purchases Wine Purchases Wine Purchases Beer Purchases Wine Purchases SUBTOTAL 155.40 966.22 1,813.40 337.12 309.90 6,436.80 1,066.61 $ 50,347.25 80 hrs 25.5 hrs 38 hrs 28.5 hrs 8 hrs 25.5 hrs 80 hrs 41 hrs 63.5 hrs 21 hrs 80 hrs 11.5 hrs SUBTOTAL 438.03 116.03 136.55 124.17 35.78 107.20 487.50 151. 85 260.34 95.55 432.63 48.88 $ 2,434.51 $ 52,781.76 I TOTAL CITY OF SHOREWOOD . PARK COMMISSION MEETING MONDAY, APRIL 7, 1986 .. croUNC1LCHAMBERS 5755. COUNTRY CLUB ROAD ,6:30' ':}~>:' ,':: .-:i_.":,,,,> ~ :--: '" - '" '." - ',., - - ,",-,' - - - - - - -'::'< ,'. - ',' - - - - ,'. " 'MINUtES .::.:; r/N,"'- FREEMAN PARK - 6:30 PM . <'..<'i! Chairman Schmid, COtmDisstoner's LindstrOlD~;~'jakel,KOoit.'Vogel;'.i1d': Liaison Shaw; .~daDinistratorY'~C)gt ;'Pu~lic'WorkSDir~c~()rZdrazil:.: Niccum vi s i tedFreemanParlttolook at't~e .r(.\ad,tha t.it,,:;.eing:bula;~~ Jurgens expressed concern over ..permitt.nd.a...gges,te~,~~inistrilt'q' E.P.A.to see if"e should have one, . stating tt>would,?&e':very expe had to be torn out. ' Public Works Director Zdrazil explained that they dug down five feet, the dirt out, and filled the area in with 6" pieces of blacktop and granular material, and it will be topped off with crushed rock. Commissioner Lindstrom offered to work with Public Works Director Zdraz.~landstake out the road which will ,begin at Eureka Road, come around to the north...l.~eofthe creek,and the final s~ep' will be joining the Eureka Road section with the other part of the road that comes north,from Highway 7 past ,the ballfields and BMXTrack and up to the south:side of the er~ek. PublicrWorks Director Zdrazil will locate a site for storage of blacktop pieces, not i to exceed 6" in size, and granular material. The ParkCotmDission is willing to have some outside Contractors haul in .blacktop pieces but want to be sure they are reputable and will only bring in material allowed. COUNCIL CHAMBERS - CITY HALL - 7:00 PM CALL TO ORDER Chairperson Schmid called the Park COtmDission meeting of April 7, 1986 to order at 7:20 PM in the Council Chambers. ROLL CALL Pres~nt: Chairperson Schmid, Commissioners Lindstrom, Jakel, Kooi, Vogel, Squires (7:39) and Jurgens; and Deputy Clerk Niccum APPROVAL OF MINUTES Vogel moved, Jurgens seconded, to approve the minutes as corrected. Motion carried unanimously. SKATEBOARD RAMP PROPOSAL FOR FREEMAN PARK Chet Frantz, 950 Iris Circle, Excelsior (474-4150) and Jack Tobin, 27475 Blue Ridge Lane, Shorewood (474-7805) appeared before the Park Commission to propose the building of a skateboard ramp in Freeman Park. PARK COMMISSION MEETING . MONDAY, APRIL 7, 1986 page t.wo . SKATEBOARD RAMP PROPOSAL FOR FREEMAN PARK continued The boys submitted photographs and plans, and the following information: Ramps can be made of wood, ffberglass or concrete. they don't recommend concrere. The plywood ramp that they submitted plans for costs approximately $1200. Helmets, kneepads and elbow pads are worn. They are working on volunteers to build the ramp. They have worked out a plan where- by anyone volunteering 10 hours of labor will receive a free one year membership. Others will pay $10 per year. They ask that the City pay for the material, with the understanding that they should be able to reimburse the City within a three year period. A petition with 114 signatures was presented to the Commission. The Commission was concerned about insurance. Staff had checked with the City carrier and reported that they would either delete the insurance from the City policy, or else the insurance would be very high. Commission asked staff to check on the exact rate. They were also concerned about injury, wondering how he wearing of protective gear could b~ guaranteed. Chairman Schmid told the boys that the Park Commission would take the issue under consideration. LANDSCAPING No plans have been presented at this time. PARK COMMISSION APPLICANT The Commission requested that Staff run a news article advertising for a new Commissioner using a deadline of May 1, 1986. HOCKEY RIN~ - ROOFING CONSIDERATION The Park Commission discussed the possibility of roofing the hockey rinks. Public Works Director Zdrazil said it would save a lot of money in maintenance costs. The Commission asked Staff to find out from Zdrazil how much it has cost over the last five years to maintain the rinks. They figured it would have to be about 200' x 75' and may be cost prohibitive. CHRISTMAS LAKE ACCESS Hours Kooi moved, Jakel seconded, to recommend to the Council that the hours be from 5:00 AM to 9:00 PM (Because people that fish like to start early, and it usually gets dark around 9:00). Motion carried unanimously - 7 ayes. -2- , . ARK COMMISSION MINUTES. MONDAY, APRIL 7, 1986 pager three . CHRISTMAS LAKE ACCESS continued Lights Jakel moved, Jurgens seconded, to recommend to Council that underground w~r~ng be put into the island nearest the ramp, so a light can eventually be put in if vandalism becomes a problem, at the expense of the DNR. . Motion carried unanimously- 7 ayes. Maintenance Kooi moved, Jurgens seconded, to recommend to Council that the annual maintenance budget be increased by $10,000 a year to provide for upkeep of the access. Motion carried unanimously - 7 ayes. S1gnage The Park Commission would like the DNR to provide two signs: One stating the hours and information concerning the 25 horsepower limit at the entrance to Merry Lane to prevent large boats from entering the road and then discovering they cannot launch; and r one within the access similar to the sample with all the following information included on the sign. PLEASE REFRAIN FROM: . ALCOHOL . GLASS CONTAINERS . OPEN FIRES . CAMPING . LITTERING . PETS . SNOWMOBILES THIS IS ACCORDING TO ORDINANCE '* 140 SHORE WOOD PARI< COMMISSION THANK YOU FREEMAN PARK ROAD The Park Commission feels that subcutting the road and parking lot and the expense of hauling fill should be paid for by the street department, and that the park depart- ment should pay for the gravel. -3- PARK COMMISSION MINUTES ~ MONDAY, APRIL 7, 1986 page four . LAWCON/LCMR GRANTS Vogel moved, Lindstrom seconded, to recommend to the Council that both grants be re- submitted. Motion carried unanimously - 7 ayes. MANOR PARK WARMING HOUSE/PAVILION Commissioner Lindstrom said the City of Minnetonka has warming houses with cement floors and concrete block walls, they can have a roof extension to use in the summer. He will check with the City of Minnetonka to see what size they are and the cost. He will also talk to Public Works Director Zdrazil to see if Public Works can dig the footings. ADJOURNMENT Kooi moved, Jakel seconded, to adjourn at 9:45 PM. Motion carried unanimously. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED Sue Niccum Park Secretary . . . Form No. A.F. 4-Notice to Clerk of Meeting of Board of Review-*EqualfzatioD. '\'." r..~n5:\ OFFICE OF COUNTY ASSESSOR TO THE CLERK OF THE City OF Shorewood Hennepin COUNTY, MITNNESOTA: NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, That the 22nd day of Mav 1986 at 7: 30 o'clocIL-LM., has been fixed as the date for the meeting of the Board of Review-*Equalization (Strike out one) -in your City for said year. This meeting should be held in your office as provided by law. J J Pursuant to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes Section 274.1, you are required to give notice of said meeting by publication and posting, not later than ten days prior to the date of said meeting. Given under my hand this d ~-\-h day of :t;~D_ r County ssessor Hennepin County, Minnesota * Applies ooly to cities whose charter providea for . Board of EqualizatioD instead of . Board of Review. rT-"" MAR :3 e SL3 . .. . Form 281-Application for Lic~nse to Sell Cigarettes at Retail. (Chapter 382, LaW!! of 1951.) /6 f 0 Miller-Davia Co., Minneapolis --,--. ~.".."- "-,~-_.- ---,--,-.--..-..--, ~tate of ;fflinnt~ota, t County ol/!~~/~.~/.?<~.... ....... ......;f (!/TY ....~... . 01... ..?//t'6Y.~.~'~~/?........... Application, ](0.. Application for License to Sell Cigarettes at Retail' The und~rsig'ned residen,t... of the........ c" /7Y ................. ...... ol..~)./I..::.<':cl.<L~.~E?....... }/'. ~,./ tn the county 01. .<^I'./.::-/~(.........................., State of j-finnesota, HEREBY .llAKE .4 PPLIC. 1.- Tln.\' FOR LICENSE to be issued to .......T/;.//.?(~.f..5.~...[.!.~~~............ ............................................................. t ll'15 tt d'15 tt nd t t 'z t /7~/) #>; Y 7 o se cz,,,,are es an ct",are e papers a wrappers a re az. a .............................. ..................................................... ...................................................................................u................................... ............................................................................... ........................... in the ~/ry .............ol..........'[!I..~~..~.{.~:..:...:~~.~.~...............in, said county and state for the term of ................., beginning with the................... ........day 01.................. ................u........................., 19.. ,subject to the laws of the State of Min,nesota and the ordinances and regulatioM of saul ............................................................0/....................................................................................ptwtaining thereto, and he. ith deposit ... $...................in. p<1.1f1M,u of fhe feo therofor. ' -/ / Dated................<??&tf.~//.......,;?.."!....... 19.~? ...=:.U<({:C?.....~.r.::::::::::::....................... ...............q:~(!!.{..~.........Y..........!?.>!~.~................................. 5G "','. . ..... . . ~. 1./._ '}d- . )IiUcr.u.,,1a ..~u.. ~Ii-"" u.... STAU 0.. IIINNBSOTA CAunbination Application for Retailers (On-sale) (Oa-l&Ie) Non-Intoxieating Malt Liquor Licenae To'M C'/TY C'F S"n/,,;("E C"/L"ClLJ 1 ~ .1'_" ......... ........ (_0) (....) (.w.p) c"..,,, of t:L E tV N E /' / /\/ /. ..7/( ~ ~ :s vi ~YL E ," 01 UN.., 1Ji,l,Io,., ". Iowll of S#I!)~~ w~"b . oountll of ,//c'~;vc>,o/,., 8,.,. 01 .AI",..."., MNbIl "WIk. appliMlJio. lor a R.taU;r'. (01HtJ"-) (011__"-) NoJHalA~'" Mall Li,qaor 1MI...1o .1... Mall UqwIr"""" Gad pv.rlUaAl N .. .,u..... (,...,.",..) ".... ., .... villal.oo....', oo...",ty board of. ,5H~~Ett/oC'j) I aU CltapUr 140, MimtMOta 8taIvM J'U, _ GJIWI"", prouitl,i,al lor JioMIi.., ... NIMlIlllttI .. .,. 01 ramH~Cin, maU Uqu.or. . . D"""', 1M ,.. ftw 1J<<Ii1'" mil J'fIUUftClf 1&aI ,*", a, /oIIoWl: 4Bt' ,S-n/ Ave /!/ttJ - h6~k;l4 ~t1? 70 ECHt7 ~IJ ,'5r/.,.eE- toJt!?c' 0 h'J,../ IIIHII ".,.. ~v6- ......,. e.?.:l. Gar /999 Ai I., /Z1tt',v#/t!'O' 77/ ,6' ~AC d ~~ y~ N E ~ ,/ J<!--,e 5E Y ........ 0.... . ........ ...... 10m. (rtM#,w) (aa1u.ra.liM4) "'.01 'M UniUtl 8tGtM. / eam 7Jl4rri.a. Mil (lIIif.',) (1n1J ) ~f) JIG" 01lG ~ i, &,9~t!l(J,eA v ~y~ ~)~ 70 Ec.HO ~/.:) sjt/"~~'~'CI~D ~N / am pro"""'. S k / ~,o<!,e E-"7 T.!"- Ii""" IIJ(U tJtlltll'P01'GtMl C~ " ou.tlwniutl N do b........ in .Alia..... UMrtM ;"Ior. /?d1/s-" hlWY 7 _(__) (W,hllJGlI) lMaW_/oUt/tIIt: i. tM .,. of rIN ZiclullIJtU N i. ..JNOtio. IlJitlt .... ItIIiIIlo Cafe. ...._.. ...... aII* .... ..... Nt opIN'. __ '1- rIN ..NW.JnMI u Joocaucl ",. UN 1Mw. rIN "...... 7>>"miMI ON tIIIJMCI "" rIN ,.., 0,. UN pN1>>rl1I aN 110I d.UJIfII"rU. / ... A/ t:) r ..'0'_ t. UN """" .z. 0/ i,.~"'.' Uqu.or. /1wI" /\.It:) / IwIcI """ oppUotJli.oa lor u.o.",. NjltllMJ _/olloWl: . I AcIw INWJ' __ ClOft,uiotM1, 0/ 0 /.zo"'1/ aor 01 'IIioZati., """II Na.tioJIG' or .,. liquor ,..., or tiMI orcIiJIG-- ~, N UN mtJiIfiU,lG/JAI,N, 11IM or h"~, .. poI.,';fJ. lor .,. .. ~ ., l~U,.,' liquor. OtJm,bU., or ta.mbU.,-- IIJiU 110I be ,.,.""itNtl oa tIN JIM... ",..",,-. / 0_"'" tIWINI' 01 UNI<<.I~~, I~, jU;I...NI, .... IqIIi,prMAI WI. 1M ",.."....Ior IMIM .. .... N .""u.. ...J!# -A. I ._ DO ....... 01' apeelUDt to tnuter tM Uceue to ..&her ..... I .aIIIDIt tile folio.. __ of ........ lMludlq . buk, tOl' nt...-, with who. I .- .... _.IA""- ........ . foIIowI: - I J)t:J ,Jor ..... to...... .. tM .... of Iatom-tiq UqUOl' aM wIII._. 1'....... 0IIIapeIIIMI 'I'u.. .... ta ....... with tM ordiaaDce &"IeralDC tbJa I..... M, 1'.....1 Tu 8&amp ....pt II No ... J.~'~~ulr:.. :1=1:' ...onp.... nIa&Iq .. SIll .... Of eoft .... fir ........ ....". l.,ne to wal..., COUUtudo...........~ ..nh ad MiauN ad will 1M' ~ ~ tal. I~ .. ~. ~-:=:,':;:::="oI" _11_ ......_ ...~~ Ilf.. ~ . I Mnb~ .......""' awv.r that the lorgo:s.:~ta an Vue COI'NCt to the .... ., ........ · ..... to _~ .... all the pI09IIIoM of ... __lr ........ ..... II ........' . ........ ad ..... .. WON _ ttI" .:< j ~ f' . _of M~,e~r/ .1LSfL ~ V; ..,.. u-. ~.. ...... _I:r .. ...... ... ... ........ ., 1M ..... ..... ... .... ... ", .... ..... .......... .. ..... .... .... ....... 1M ... III a .... ... ... ... ~4dI". ., ... . .. ...... ... ..... ... ....... a... a.... .. .... .' . -f5./J APPLICATION FOR REFUSE COLLECTOR LTCENSE (under City Ordinance No. 176) - . Date ~-28-/9K' .. Applicant t.;iLL/Ah1 J;..;llAJ ~RELJF Firm Name (;D PH€te. S"Ti4TE rR~/t'~/AJ~ Business Address Ro, Box ~? EY(!€LS/()~ MINN. Residence Address ,~Bso Eel f/O ~OF1D L::~e(=LS/oJe, I ' Telephone (Business) 47'1- :?OS.~ (Home) # 7'/ - 3(j}SS Applicant hereby applies for a Refuse Collector License for a term of one year from January 1, 19~, to the following December 31, 19~ Description of Motor Vehicle (s) 197.3 I/tITEIf' l'U~rloIVAL, /700 L oAf> STifle Description of other equipment to be used in collection I . Applicant is sufficiently covered by an insurance policy against loss or injury to persons in the following amounts: each person injured Yes ( ) NO ( ) maximum coverage for each accident Yes () No ( ) , . 01::" A CHECK IN THE AMOUNT OP AS THE FEE- FOR THIS j ~,'. . . PAGE 2 " Are you the owner of the business? Yes (~ No ( ) If you have answered "no" to the above question, give owner's name Are you familiar with the prov~s~ons of Ordinance No. 176, an ordinance for the purpose of promoting the health and general welfare by regulating the keeping of garbage and regulating and licensing the conveying and hauling thereof in Shorewood? Yes (~ No ( ) The following is a schedule of charges for our services: n Charge Charge Charge Charge Charge Charge /1 8, 'IS 61 S(j.CJ~ Pc Ie Alo. Pelf Mo. Type of Service eGSIIJ~AJTIAL Type of Service DUMP~rGJe, Type of Service Type of Service Type of Service Type of Service All refuse will be hauled and deposited at the following location(s) : L6illS UILLE LnlJn ~/LL. t! ill4SkJII I11Iit/AlJ , , , The refuse will be disposed of in the following manner: E,fEer€D F'RoM PA~kc/e F ~OL/GICti"O tJ/rll Dl/eT . I (we) hereby agree to operate the refuse collection business in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota and the ordinances of the City of Shorewood. The foregoing statements are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. FIRM NAME ~ oPfle,e sr19T6 SI~NATQRF;~.u~ . --< POSITION- OtJ 1V€R..t TJe(f(!K/~ / . . ,. CITY OF SHOREWOOD MAYOR Robert Rascop COUNCIL Jan Haugen Tad Shaw Kristi Stover Robert Gagne ADMINISTRATOR Daniel J. Vogt 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD . SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 . (612) 474-3236 MEMORANDUM TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: BRAD NIELSEN DATE: 10 APRIL 1986 RE: OLSON, WARREN - SWIMMING POOL PERMIT PROPERTY FILE: 23820 YELLOWSTONE TRAIL Minnetonka Pool and Spa, Inc., on behalf of Mr. Warren Olson has requested a building permit to construct an inground swimming pool and spa at the above-referenced address (see Site Location map - Exhibit A, attached). The applicant's site plan, shown on Exhibit B, complies with the requirements of the Shorewood Zoning Ordinance, with one exception. The setbacks are measured from the outer edge of the pool deck. This will require either shortening the pool deck or moving the pool itself to comply with the rear yard setback. It should be noted that the 24 foot setback is consistent with the prov1s1on allowing swimming pools to be located at 60 percent of the required rear setback (.60 x 40 = 24). If there are any questions relative to this request, please contact my office prior to the meeting on 14 April. BJN: sn cc: Dan Vogt Jim Norton Robert Stevenson A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore 5F~ I'.... / . ~~ 'jl{ff1 " ~, _~~~ ~ ~ ~\~ ..~ ~ ~<6-~ (7) '} (ZI) 10 ~O'.I~ ~ ~'\) 'l' ~ ., .. . .. 14 .. . ;.." .,', Ij) ~) r .. ~.' ..1... ~ .. ~ " i", r ~ f '0 --t ~ !'{:' (1 "- 170 i \ ; . , '''; ~\ (:' '" ~ .. ... .. '. .:.... 121) ", In .Let. tt'D"~' II' ,'." T. .,t.' .,.r',' tl. ." . \............1 ' 1~ _ ______' . ..~ - --,- , -' 'I'. /' .e"-\'J "- .......... 1 I; ~.l' ,: ..... I ...7 tiS." : , ~~l'" .~,,, " 1\ ~, '4 ..~- .j /1' ~ 0) . ...... .... 1:--- :. '6$ 4.~ >~ 17Z .-~ ~.; J , n\'+J \S~ U0v " ... ~) . " 163 _~1l) . ;i'>' . ~ -co ~., I -~~~..-=~'". . a 4.. ..~.l, /.\ 1\ ..~ \'.~; t~ ~.r;';f1\!J r-.... .. '!4~ };."Mo '~"',. .~:.. 1J:~,,' t I .. "f,. I!' ~~~~~ 'f I l ~) I I ~ I - ~ ~:. \ ,.. r I ,. ,. "- o-ttnd U,e S-. lit .. ~ '( ~- z::.. ..+ -~ 'J (> -r. -\ I- r ... -t: ~ . . - - ",-,</11-,."""" Eire _""'1 ~...5"" ",~ ,4". LJ~.'" hit' ", P,."...d ,.~ " ..- ~ ~ ~. L. z. ,... f lit . . , :-: ' . .. !... .. ... . ... .. ..' "'; t - t'_ ')C ; . . . .' (? o r ... : . -.. , ." "-' ,,":. '/ . . . , .:" ""~ , .. '~"I , " ,-;, ,..' . "" .. - '.. .'.... ","... ": ,.', " " ~ .. .. ..".t.. " .", .' . ." _... ), ..:." "r .... ,,' .. . .. ..... "g~'.. ... ^YI~-;r~!> ',~ > .... .; ..' I. _ .....- , , .- , t -,. "..' , ,.., "." .. ",' :. '. .. .. ";." .." , ., .-' tOO .." .... .. .- .. /. .. -.' " .' ' ..' .. ':.of .. .. ,," .... ;, , ".. .. :]: o G, '" 00 -0 s. ~l .... rs_ ~- ~h,b,t t> . . ~o~~@u@~~& ~@@[b@a O~@C -8 10820 Wayzata Blvd., Minnetonka, MN 55343 / 612-546-3281 W t\r-..R-Q ~ C \~t'/.;j GENERAL RENAtiKS The fO.;19wing speciftcat.ions are issued in e.]mpliance with all ~~t\\LX.\....:..:c(A: health and con;;:;truction codes stipulated. All equipment specified herein is NSF approved. The propos~d privat~ swimming ~_o~ is: to be cons~::"~~~'t4 crt . , r, +~L.}..C \~\\t)"""'<;'Ib""\: Jj2AIL locatee In.....~h(.I1..\..'^-t.{.<i The following specifications include only the im3tallation of one e~ . t-c.')<. ;+. 4 ~\\ L vinyl liner swimming pool and shall not be construed to include any additional structure or shelter hereafter referred to or implied. Fence requirements are to be done by the owner as shown on the drawing. Any' and all changes to thesel~pecificat~.',ns must be approved by Minnetonka Pools, Inc. and the 8~O\u-\....:t("_A .~ department of public health, prior to construction. These specifications do not include operational permit fees or inEpectior. fees. A Min. 3 Ft. patio shall surround entire poo1. Pool shall have a 6"x;,O" concrete frost-footing re~.inforced w:i.th 3/8" re-rod. All equipment and piping shall be UL or NSF approved. Fence shall be a minimum of ---1-Ft., non-climbable w""ith self-latching gates. Electrical shall conform to article 680 National Electric Code. Swimming Pool to be located as follows: 6 Ft. from house to pool W.-8'vc(L d.-b Ft. from rear lot lir:e t.o fool~ --LEt.l..-Ft. from rigtt lot line to pool LuAI\:.~ ~LFt. from left lot line to pool' l.VA~ uh~.b,t G DISTRIBUTOR OF FOX POOLS / STRONGEST NAME IN POOLS MEMO TO: FROM: DATE: RE: . CITY OF SHOREWOOD MAYOPt RobertRlIICOP COUNCI L Jan Haugen Tad Sh_ Kristi Stover Robert Gagne ADMINISTRATOR Daniel J. Vogt 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD . SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 . (612) 474-3236 MAYOR & COUNCILMEMBERS D~OGT, EVELYN BECK i J APRIL 7, 1986 PERMANENT APPOINTMENT - KATHLEEN SCHWANKL As of this date, Kathleen Schwankl has completed the six month probation period per Council policy. She is an excellent employee and dedicated to the position that she has accepted. We recommend permanent appointment to that position. . ~._. _.'C,-. .; ~~ ~." .. A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore ...50 <<~ ' ,-"" >'<,^':.~:<~+:,,,,-" ,--~:~,-::j"Y MEMO TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: . MAYOR Robert R8ICOP' COUNCI L Jan Haugen Tad Shaw Kristi Stover Robert Gagne ADMINISTRATOR Daniel J. Vogt CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD . SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 · (612) 474-3236 MAYOR AND COUNCILMEMBERS DAN VOGT..:Jiff APRIL 10, 1986 CORRIDOR STUDY - REQUEST FOR PAYMENT ; Attached to this memo you will find a billing for the Shorewood share of the Highway 7 corridor study. Funding participation was authorized by Resolution No. 91-85. In discussing this with Ev, it is our recommendation to pay this bill at this time coding it to contractual under Mayor and Council (code 5135) and to place on the calendar for a formal budget amendment in November. This amendment will then be done with any other amendment~ which are needed for the year. Also, we will be better able to recommend the source of the funds at that time of year. For example, excess revenues or under spending may alleviate funds coming from the Contingency Fund. This item is placed under. the consent agenda for the meeting of April 14 for your consideration. Call if you wish to discuss this prior to Monday night. DJV : sn cc: Ev Beck A Residential Community on Lake MinnetonkIJ's South Shore SII ; . .Y . Rfr'n MAR 1 4 1986 q" ...'! ,I." .,.~ ~...- .~ . "'IN Cl't\.... Dan Vogt ~ Administrator I S S U E D TO City of Shorewood 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, MN 55331 NOTICE Make All Checks Payable To: METROPOLITAN COUNCIL Accounts Receivable 300 Metro Square Building 7th and Robert Streets St. Paul, Minn. 55101 Highway 7 Corridor Study (See attachments) Total Amount Due and Payable to the Metropolitan Council Receipt Code 123-359-5610000 I declare under penalties of law that the foregoing account is just and correct and that no part of it has been paid., White Copy-Issuee Yellow Copy-Program Mgr. Pink Copy-Issuee Goldenrod Copy-Accounts Receivable . INVOICE ~"])L-15illL. DATE 02/28/86 All Bills Due and Payable Upon Receipt $5,000.00 i Return One Copy of Invoice With Payment lA). E. ~u1:f' 111,.. w. E. Scott, III ~. Name Financial Operations Supervisor Title (612}; 291-643tJ . '<~ Phone MEMO TO: FROM: DATE': SUBJECT: . . MAYOR .. Robert RIICOP COUNCIL Jan Haugen Tad Shaw Kristi Stover Robert Gagne AOMINISTRATOR Daniel J. Vogt CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD . SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 · (612) 474-3236 MAYOR AND COUNCILMEMBERS DAN VOGT ~ APRIL 10, 1986 WEED SPRAYING i The City has again received a quotation for weed spraying for road right-of-way and parks from Mr. Jim Mahoney. The quotation is attached. The total quote for 1986 is $2,390. This compares with a total cost of $2,285 in 1985 or a 4.6% increase. Public Works Director Zdrazil has discussed said spraying with other firms and indicates that this is our best price for these services. Also Mr. Zdrazil indicates that Mr. Mahoney has done an excellent job for the City ip the past. Also, as. in the past, this is a budgeted item. This year we budgeted $2,700 for this service (code 6743). I recommend acceptance of the 1986 quote for contracted weed spraying from Mahoney Services, Inc. in the amount of $2,390. This item appears on your consent agenda of your April 14 meeting for your consideration. Call me if you have any questions. ~... k-::-~- A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore 5; . . ~ P.O. Box 356 Excelsior, MN. 55331 March 28, 1986 City of Shorewood 5755 Country Club Rd. Shorewood, MN. 55331 To whom this may concern: Request for the awarding of the 1986 Road Side Noxious weed spraying contract. We also would like to handle the weed spraying for Badger, Manor, Cathcart and Freeman fields and the Village Hall yard. The spraying would be handled the same as last year. A. We have all the spraying equipment needed to do the work properly. B. Licensed by the State of Minnesota. C. Fully insured. The price for the Road Side spraying this year $1800.00 The price for the Park spraying this year 590.00 Sincerely yours, r~ Mahoney Home Services, Inc. . . -;.CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNlF~~ CLUB ROAD . SHOREWOOD. MINNESOTA 55331 · (612) 474-3236 MAYOR Robert Rascop COUNCI L Jan Haugan Tad Shaw Kristi Stover Robert Gagne ADMINISTRATOR Daniel J. Vbgt MEMORANDUM TO: PLANNING COMMISSION, MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: BRAD NIELSEN DATE: 28 MARCH 1986 RE: KING, WALLACE - SIMPLE SUBDIVISION AND LOT AREA VARIANCE FILE NO.: 405 (86.05) BACKGROUND Mr. Wallace King, 25620 Birch Bluff Road, has requested approval of a subdivision which would allow him to purchase the northeast corner of the lot located at 25625 Birch Bluff Road (see Site Location map - Exhibit A, attached). The properties in question are separated by the right-of-way of Birch BI~ff Road. The reason for the request is that the actual traveled surface of Birch Bluff Road strays out of its r.o.w. as it intersects with Eureka Road. As can be seen on Exhibit B this creates a small triangle of land which is physically separated from the southerly lot by the street. From a practical perspective the triangle relates more to Mr. King's lot than to the southerly lot. Since the southerly lot is already substandard in size (9,656 square feet, not includin~ the street surface), and the proposed division reduces it further, the appli~ant has requested a variance. ANALYSIS/RECOMMENDATION It is easy to see that the small triangle of property is worthless to the southerly lot. This situation is also considered to be a problem for the City in that the traveled surface wanders from the r.o.w. Having discussed the matter with the other staff, it would be to everyone's advantage to resolve the problem. The recommended solution, however, is somewhat different than the applicant's request. It is suggested that the City require that the property containing the paved roadway, plus 10 feet along its south side, be dedicated to the City. In turn, any portion of the existing right-of-way in excess of 50 feet be vacated and conveyed to Mr. King. This is illustrated on Exhibit C. A ..ResidentiS/~mn,uiii6i- on__-LJ!Jke:f.fjMiilDiJk.~~5Dutb:3iin.e;-,-~_.~~:--;':~ :~--~-- .. t--.. . .-,--}f'''Y'l> . . Re: Wallace King request 28-March 1986 Although the road will not quite be centered on the new r~o.w." the 10 feet will at least provide the minimum necessaryr.o.w. for road maintenance. Vacation of the street will require a separate public hearing which could be held by the City Council at its meeting on 12 May. Surveying must be done to prepare legal descriptions for the new r.o.w.,and for the portion of the old r.o.w. to be vacated. Normally, this would be the responsibility of the applicant. However, since the recommendation of the staff benefits both the applicant and the City, the City may wish to split the costs with Mr. King. As a final note, the applicant must provide an up-to-date title op1n1on for the southerly property prior to finalizing the subdivision/street vacation process. BJN:ph cc: Dan Vogt Glenn Froberg Jim Norton Wallace King Gerald Carroll I ~~!,~:~,:::~~ -.':::=J.--- . 2 '- ..~~~ ,.j~ J ~ ~ ~ c ~ j ~}~~~!~~" ~ .u'= -r~ . ~ 'i:E: _'"- ~ [g: - r - - ~ _. . - ~ - .~ . . '" / '" 1'~ ~~ ,,' 'lo 1ft ~ -.- .{\ ./ '" .... i ." ~'.. ~.\\ r \ \ ll",: ...... ',. ; .....' .... -;. ... - .... ....... -.. .. 'It ~ '. · . ~ .~ ~ -CJ1L.. ~. Hun <L~ . iijJ.:tn~ ... ~, -!_~~-- ~- ( I;.j,', f' . . ~" '.}......g-:- '., ~c 'ijI_ L ,:.~~:~:~~~?,.r-~~ 5__ ~ . ", ~... -..-" \ .~~ .,. , \~ ,.r ~~ ... \.~. 1\1_ - ';- :-; -;\-- ~~Jl€ 5;t ~ ~-!);I.' ~ 0 !fa,_~, ...3J \ \ ~ \. -;- ~"'i'i,.. .... \;z) -, - \' -:-: :~;: - ;. --1 ' \ ,., -> k. ~ ~. I -:- ~~t +- - k. ~ ~:: '3~ c~.J. 3 c -." a 1 m .- . .;.'" ~ '- '" ~~ .=1:- ~5:----,ft- "--'" ~ , " . '-:-;) '-1.1 ... 1',"-' ';1- -:';':..9 J: ~. ~.~- ~ ~ ~~ .,! .- :r . ~ -~~I" ~ ~r:~~-~ "I ,rO.. -l ~ ., ."''101 ..:lI ~ t7~1 '.~ r'7 ... I I 1 r \0 I~ -, ~\ I \ \ \ \ \ \ " -;:-- ~ -:;-- ~ ... -- ~ ~I'",,, , \ ~ ~ ~ It) ';:" c: ~ a .... Q) c: . .... ~ ........ (0"; .. Exhibit A SITE LOCATION King - Simple subdivision and lot area variance \" J" ' ... ... ,,--., 'cP,r '. I~J .. ,- lI') ~ ~ IY') ~ fo" n! -. '---':-:-~;'-~i:::Cfi_'~';'-~~- .. ........;. . -~~,.-~,;:i "'--0.;._. ." , .. c:-~-- ~ ~. ~~~:~.::~;.!f:= . . . , - ;;.:;,,~:'~.._"""_': ,..'".c,'__;;.,."'.-.;>.::O:;-"-....'-'<'.c~"~70:-,..~ ."......, - ;.. ,_':-.''';..'_':.C';'''. . . I . J.Q"Z,D ("-in,) . p . No ..... h. ~ -to ~(4l4,.. .- ~ (?\~f~ f,,~h I:, '0\\\\.\\. ~_. ~~. .J . . , , , Hi ..1 I " . ".'" pr~L" to ,,,,..1:>'-''1 th',~ f(J4"j I I l- ~ ~ o ... '0 .... -" - .. " ... , , , ..... ", '.' ,,' % Gf.ZS- ',' .' ~;' ,'L, ". 011 l~ I iii 11 1 :4r,' , ,r- ; 7-/ r=i ... "',O~ . ').... r' 011 2' ~l c.f\r f 1\ 1.11 ( ': eUI.Dlh. ... . . " ,,-<-.r;( ,H I~ , ,~~ ..j:a,.139 ~l.~-'~ I~ 35 .., 3&1" ~ ~i lU I Exhibit B PROPOSED DIVISION/COMBINATION IU :-~';.' :~_~:.r't.~.~:~_.~,,::.:?:,<;;c~,~~.-. ~'- --.'. I" t ~: reo . ~oft " ~t to ",.\c. . ~. F- ~ . ..~A,~",<;;.-;",~,;,..;..S~;;;~~,~;, -- ~ I -". : ~""-, . I ,- , t- , "- , . . , '. " ,< ~~ ,f : -;:~;f~;.~ ?~~i~ oell' ,",:" ,_" " "",... '" f ."ut... ~\" . ..,.,_ I .~: . ""'.: Exhibit C RECOMMENDED SOLUTION I I J.6I.ZD ("-in,) ~ ~ o .. ... .. _1':' . . ..... .. .. . ... " ,.- %Ge.z.S- " ," ." . 31" 7'" ,t~_, . '" I~ I .. .J?) 1';4 ;--rT 7, . ".... ;;0 ~". '" "T " CD ..or. " '. ,. . z '" !! I I H5 F." . I Iii, '. . . ". CITY OF SHOREWOOD MAYOR Robert Rascop COUNCI L Jan Haugen Tad Shaw Kristi Stover Robert Gagne ADMINISTRATOR Daniel J. Vogt 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD . SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 · (612) 474-3236 MEMORANDUM TO: PLANNING COMMISSION, ~~YOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: BRAD NIELSEN DATE: 26 MARCH 1986 RE: HASKINS, DAVID - SETBACK VARIANCE FILE NO.: 405 (86.04) BACKGROUND Mr. David Haskins has requested approval of a setback variance to build a home on Lot 2, Block 1 of the Robert S.C. Peterson Addition (see Site Location map-Exhibit A, attached and plat - Exhibit B, attached). As shown on Exhibit C the house which Mr. Haskins proposes to build does not fit on the lot he has chosen. The property is zoned as a planned unit development. You will recall that Robert Peterson was allowed to plat smaller lots, clustered ona private road with reduced setbacks, as part of the P.U.D. approval. Although the development agreement went so far as to include a copy of the plat with setbacks shown shaded in (see Exhibit D, attached), the applicant was apparently given a copy of some preliminary lot layout showing different (lesser) setbacks. His house design was based on that preliminary drawing. The applicant's justification for his request is contained in Exhibit E, attached. ANALYSIS/RECOMMENDATION Having advised against the lot configurations in the Peterson P.U.D., it is somewhat frustrating from a planning perspective for the first building permit in the subdivision to require a setback variance. While oddly configured lots (triangular lots being among the worst) invariably result in reduced buildable area, lot configuration is not the primary reason for the applicant's plight. The proposed house simply has not been designed for the lot in question. Following are reasons why a variance is not justified: A ResidentiaICommut,ityo'!LakeMinnetQn'rJ!'s$.oyt!L$lttJrtl 8 ~ . . Re: Haskins, David 26 March 1986 1. There is ample room on the property to place a house and still take advantage of the lake view (see Alternative Designs - Exhibit F, attached). 2. While the City has been understanding relative to the need for garages in the Minnesota climate, it is difficult to demonstrate hardship for a triple garage. 3. One of the criteria for evaluating variances is that the situation can not have been created by the owner. If the lot configurations are not something which was created by the owner, certainly the design of the house is. 4. The applicant has indicated that redesigning the house causes problems with the financing he has arranged. Consistent with State law, our Zoning Ordinance states that hardship shall not be based solely on financial consider- ation. It is felt that the City demonstrated extreme flexibility in approving the Peterson P.U.D. In view of the preceding analysis plus the previous recommendation relative to lot configurations, the request for variance is considered completely unjustified. Denial of the request is therefore recommended. BJN:ph cc: Dan Vogt Glenn Frobert Jim Norton David Haskins - 2 - ,7. AUlANS SAY) '. No~k ''':::~' -..-..-'. I CHRISTMAS LAKE I I I I I i Exhi bit A SITE LOCATION Haskins - setback variance .- --- ~ II // CHAN-iASSEN . ~-=:-~c"3' ---t++=-.._~~_.. 'Z.I . ..~~=oc -~:JtI - ~-~-.~~~=:~~7'-~_ (~""(' ?~. -T. I I --. 'I ") 3 _..' 1_ ..... . ~ i! ( ,", , - '- ....., " .., ' .- ' Ca./' /1 e- ~ if.,' CEMETERY , , OF THE f,t~ RESURRECTION "- /.... -- ~\ 12 4 '"' .. (lb) t '! IJ "- O. t. ~ .... '" , \ ) en (17) 5 , t- :.-r 0:: .... lIJ '. 4(0~ ]:.; en ,;' .. 0 .\, -I l11 0:: .# .,"" l&J " toW 4 ~ 0 Z :..st 4Z~~' CEMETERY OF THE !.RESURRECTION ~ ... ... .I ...- -- ,.-7'~JtJtJ ) , (/) " (f!:>) Exhi bit B FINAL PLAT Robert S.C. Peterson Addition \ ~, -'11. ..... II ".0" JI." III .-%. ''4 [:: ... i'" r'Q I~ I b ,'" !'" ~ ~ 40' , o..i ~I Gli .... I). . NKt~ 1".'2110' ::: ~ " O. L. _4~ I....... ~ ;... .... .c '. , .", '" "~3:. ~ --~ 14: .... ~ .... 'V t \J) ~.<: loo\lr\ CJ;:j \J) C\J .... .. In. '"'' ,...,. ,," ,,:.'f'" ,.~ Z . ?of' .10' dol '. ,.., ,(fir l"" 5 ! J M.... 011.... ~ 'I .oOlib liIl~ H"JI'...y .... to!> .. ( "'In...~~. "","",~~~"'J:l I~UIII 011.0 8'fO ""0 110' Clift R...' '\111''''.'-. "'''"'->'_ !.!IJ.) 1 t. uau"aa.. _........."1... .I~--=- ,.... .-.::.-:_-...~ r",~,~ ,-~~. ~-- Certificate of Survey for DA VIO HASKIN9 '7 ~) .,' ~\O /01 ~\ ~. ~ ~ ~. \... . ~~ "- ~ ~ \ ~ct..\ ~'\':r ~~ \ ~c \ ~, .C::- ~ . ~l. \ ~~ ~ ~ -t/ \ \~ \ \ \'0 I I LOT 2 , BLOC/~ f , R08ERr S, C~ PETERSON 400, Iknn!pin C'ounly j Min/)tsola. (Sl./bjecl 10 (oS'emenls J i//'lC!tJy) !!ar~! ~"t I"'~! ",_., ..':....'~.9.,;..!. Propo~id ~QI/onG : TOp or block Bqsemenl Floor 1019.(2 1009. , --~...-...:.- o denolis /ron monumenl. BfC1r"n$~ art Cl~~umed. 4-~ ,...10, .' . : ~ t::! '~ " \ ":'. \ '". . . ".. ". . ",',\ ~ '<::)c:. , ~ ~6 C,) r- ,\ I o . '" on ,..:. ,..;. ~ ..... 10 I L---- . .... ~-..... ~c .f\,~ ~ ;- ~~'ol\.Cl a~ ~ ~~. ~~ .... ~ <; .,. tJa,'40'54" E j" :;.30 I Exhibit C SITE PLAN (SURVEY) .,.,.... .. . ."...., .f 'h. ...".....rl.... .h. ....... ....1..4 .11 ,,1.1..1. .".....h"'...... If ..." 'r... ... - A.D.'. . mAN INGINUIING, INC. '...,. s,,"'.,.,. , r.~ .. . ~ ,;..-.;;~~~';~,;,ii.':; '., ',i,...:..~ ~'~ Nor Published: All RiGf\tt R..rved NW. c.or. 6011'1. Lol ~ 5ec. 311 T /I~ R. 2.3 1 ,~O. f: 3 ~ ~IZ ..TI-. (1) (1) (1) 0. 0 III :3 0.1"T I"T I"T ~....(1) nnnnll c: I"T .. "0 III .... ..... .,..N-. I ., :T ......0 utZIZ .~ X:, 0 ~ I"T :3 :;.:l ~~.~~ c."" "\ ~ "0 ...... w (1) ---'" (1) ......~ oLl '!"...~ - :) ., :J :3 c: :;i~~i I"T ~ 0.0 .... IN.... '< (1) ., :3 0.(1) ......1Il 0 (1) 0. - .... I"T I"T 1......1 - -...... -- :3 0 ., ~ III ~~8is (1) ., (1) n (1) . (1) n :TI"T 0- ., (1) ~ ~:::t~ (1) o.~ . . . 'Ii f: ~ n lSPS~o;!:; .... I"T ~ " I"T .... n III qq'iii- :TO n .... :3 (1) III :J III :T ~~~d < l/l 0 VI (1) 0 ~ 888si 0 :T., .... '< ..... N'\n l/l ~~~~i :.0 := () (1) -~:T ~~ . (1) (1) c: ~ ';~. I"T III .... 0. U'::lal1 ......(1) 0 0 0. 0. ,-. ......., .... . ..# :J {f'. I"T (1)(lQ :ToLl l/l ..... (1) c: :3 .... III "0 :T I ~ ;2;:~oJ~~ ...... ...... 1I"lel -:~''':'f ,-, ~~~U_ :~. _~_~_I (), , ......... v-. ~ 0#. n ~ ./, "0 :::;:! ~O ~~ ~Dl , I ...11) ... I . .; ..;lit q Z Z ~ :E c . .-4 -. ..:.. .(1) C 00 z C' ~ r "II) .. ell) I .0 I n ! <- ~ ~ '"-4 "PI ~ 011) . ... J> ! z 0 !'\ ~ 0 I I - .. . - ,. . .. i ."",. . " .. ,.... - . I ... ~ ;J . ... Z >> ~ '" - ~ . .. . .. D I .. ;; s ~ ~ I .. & n . ~ (II - >> .. .. '" .. .. ! - ,. .. ... .. .. c .. 1 0 ... 0 () V ..... 0-'" ..'"Z ..... .n.... "c.. ~, ~:- _ " Z Q~ :;~~. ... . - ~:~~ c ~. ... >> z ~i ~an. ~ a : io.- r ,. ... io ..... >> ll'>.. .. ;,~i!! c.s. ..n_ ~n gio: .. z t-. 1Il!i!>> ~~ -i'i ~ ....~"I I) ..... !i: 8 . "'""" ....,. ~ ~ai ... ~ c \:: .. -:c. ... ... I "'P", ,. ... i '1 Exhibit D .. " REQUIRED SETBACKS <;,.~ ) From Peterson P.U.D. development agreement ~ " " /I r . ;. '. . . -- Marerl1-, . 1986 A. The partnership of David Haskins and Michael Nelson (Ridge View Heights Properties) respectfully request a variance as shown on the attached survey to accommodate the proposed house. 1. The change from the preliminary Plat set backs of 30' at the street and 30' at the southern border have made it impossible to site our house along the lines intended by the original Poll.D. The variance requested on the west boundary of the road would be approximately 5 feet and the set back required on the south boundary, the variance would be approximately 9 feet. 1. There would be no impairment of adequate light suppy of air to adjacent property. 2. This would not cause any unreasonable increase of congestion to' the private street. 3. There would be no increase of danger of fire or endangerment of public safety. 4. There would be no diminished value of adjoining property values. 5. There would be no violation of the city comprehensive planned unit development as the purpose of the planned unit development, as one of the purposes of the unit development plan is to develop unusual shaped properties and increase tax revenues for the city. 2. B. 1. These special circumstances regarding the triangle shape of the land, the best utilization is to have the home facing south and southwest to create the most attractive view and be in concept with the whole planned unit development proposal. The existing site makes the best use of existing topography to facilitate drainage. Due to the unusual triangle shape of the land and narrowness caused by the misunderstanding of the setback, this would be the best use of the land. It would also leave as many mature i:trees standtngasc'possible. 2. Literal interpretation of these setbacks would deprive this applicant of reasonable development of this site. Further, we would assume similar variances have been"granted by the city in similar cases. 2. C. The applicants believe, for the reasons set forth above, this would make the most reasonable use of the land and the minimum variances necessary. Exhibit E-l APPLICANTS REQUEST LETTER , ~ ~ ~ ~;'. ~ ~ ~ I)~ ~ V( Oe- II. "" .-~ ~ " ...... K c- ..... ~.~~ -l.~ ~ . .., t J ?--, ~ ,....... .... ~~~ h..~~ :t .c:....... ,.. .... u ~ <::l..~ :t)~~ ()~~ t:':::t:: '-....:. en . C)' ~I ~~ ......0 QIQj ....... ~ . ~ (:) ~ f s:- ~ ~ ~ ~ c: ..2 ~ ...... ~ '^ CJ\ ~ ~ g .s: '~ ~ ot:Q < ~ 0- \ ~ 'c':b c> 4- .o~ ~ O.,D . of! .,D-,,'" 'p ". -- -'--~/ ! --=-- ..:.::. ... - .---- ---!...-- r..~ . ~}. i .. ~ .. 11: -.... j ....~ ~I ~ 1.( ~ <..l.......... ~i ~ c:: 0' "" ~i ~ ~ 01 <::l.. VJ 2t~~ c:tl .~ .OJ \,\'1 0:; / /// / . ~ /' 'I ~/d PdP,.JO;?IJ ..rld /jWi.J.JiJSD3 1t/1f'!1) l P9oU.'OJO -':--'" L.- __ -- -- -.....- -- - ~ ~ ~ ~.' \J . ;:>) ~I) ~ -;::- (',# '" ~ -...: 0, ~ ~.~ K c: ..... II, c: '" ...'-q~ ........ --l~ ~ .' .., t -.J ?--, ~ ....... , , ;: ~ J) :;j~ \.....~~ tt .c:....... ,.. .... u ..... <::l.. ~ ~~~ o<:J ~ ~ ::t: ':::t:: '-....:. \al , \ ~ \ " it __J S! ...... . Os-Lt li! ; fl'S~~ J-W1r" \ ~~ ......0 () <:J: --I ......i ~ <<) ~ \) ~ E c:- :J ~ ~ ~ c: C) ... .,~ ~ '" CJ\ ~ ~ c.. c:- ...~ ( ~ c ot:Q -- I :.:.: :.::=-.---.-.:...:.=L---ii.p I 11: -.... <II ~ .~ ~ ~I ......... ~ ~1.( _~1 g.......... CI::ii-c:: I ..J::::l "" 01<. E ~1 a- " 01 t:l.. VJ ~~~ c:tl ~ -0 '. \ ~ .c<b. <:'o~ '%-~ O.,D 0 of!.., ~-" 'p /' .~ ./ ,OJ ./ ~\'J /' 0:; / ./ / /" I ~ / '/~/d pdp,.JO,?IJ .nd "/jWi.J.JiJSD3 It/ 1j.'11) lI9oU./oJO -"~" --. L-.... _ - -"- -- -- ----': Exhibit F ALTERNATIVE DESIGNS \al . ./ \ ~ \ 10 it __J S! ..:..... oSl~ . .- ....j;:... li! fl'Sil /1.111r" 1: .11 if i-Ji ~- j ;1 ii. Zl ;- !I : .~ Z HOlt ... . ,;i; z . JJe.. if Ii ~ .I.. · -r ;. '; ilt HI I~J . ~ li ,-- .ail iiJ' JH: al~ .... ':11' =... ~ 11 .. U ~f rJi ~. I ~l HI: -." = . - :.. Z ".. i !lO'z ; ..=! -." ';"1. Z pc: If p. iI, !If HI ~ . lu :ii ijJ' !il if I !..~ tl" hI -n . . MAYOR Robert Rascop COUNCI L Jan Haugen Tad Shaw Kristi Stover Robert Gagne ADMINISTRATOR Daniel J. Vogt CITY OF SHOREWOQD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD . SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 . (612) 474-3236 MEMORANDUM TO: PLANNING COMMISSION, MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: BRAD NIELSEN DATE: 9 APRIL 1986 RE: OLSON, WARREN - SIMPLE SUBDIVISION FILE NO.: 405 (86.06) BACKG~OUND Mr. Warren Olson has requested approval of a simple subdivision of his property located at 5600 Grant Lorenz Rd. (see Site Location map-Exhibit A, attached). The property contains approximately 90,239 square feet in area and is located in the R-1A, Single-family Residential District. Mr. Olson proposes to divide the property into two lots as shown on Exhibit B. ANALYSIS/RECOMMENDATION The property in question consists of Lot 1, Block 4, and part of Outlot A, Oak Ridge Estates Second Addition. As you may recall, Mr. Olson requested the combination of the two parcels back in the late part of 1981, prior to the platting of Oak Ridge Estates Third Addition. Mr. Olson now proposes to redivide the two parqels. Both parcels conform to the mlnlmum lot size requirements of the R-1A district. Mr. Olson's residence has been located on the westerly half of the property so that it complies with the required setbacks. Since the construction of Mr. Olson's house, it has been noted that a relatively high water table exists on the easterly parcel. As a result, a soil test was requested from the applicant as part of his application information. A soils report, dated 29 October 1985, prepared by Advance Surveying and Engineering Company, recommends the following corrective measures prior to construction: A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore 9 . . Re: Warren Olson Subd. 9 April 1986 a. Remove all organic material beneath the proposed structure and 10 feet beyond.- b. Place granular, compacted fill up to footing and floor levels. c. The lowest floor level should be no lower than the level of the existing ground to avoid water problems in the basement. Since the proposed lots comply with current zoning requirements, and the new lot is suitable as a building site, it is recommended that the division be approved subject to the following: 1. The applicant must provide a new 10 foot drainage and utility easement along the west side of Lot 1, Block 4. 2. A park dedication fee ($500) must be paid prior to release of the resolution approving the division. 3. The applicant is responsible for sewer equalization charges. These can either be paid now or assessed against the new lot. r 4. An up-to-date (within the last 30 days) title opinion must be submitted for review by the City Attorney. 5. The division must be recorded within 30 days of the applicant's receipt of the Council resolution approving the request. BJN:ph cc: Dan Vogt Jim Norton Glenn Froberg Warren Olson - 2 - ';S' ~~ II: ~ :6Q01o, : 0':-- 0... ,,- ~ ......' "" 0, ... 'S ~ 0 '1 ~ s CD~ ~ ..... , 9 \~ ,. f' ~ & :r ., ~- .." .., ...:---.. '"~ ';" ......,.~ ~ 10' snn \.101 ..t &' -=-- 13 ..;::/ \D 1 , , ,..... I .../; :"Y "" :' i r'~ ~ ~ ~ .., ;; ~, , ~ ~ I \ . ~ ~ Ci' ~ - r-- -;. '-" ~ I .....~ -- '."6/ 7 Z ,,, _ . I 1__. ---" --- I CD tt CD ~ I- :. -S r-- I . I I I _ I lo'A 1,..--- t;~ ll!:~ I ~. I ' t ., ..I .. ~ .. ~ ~ ,... CD r.' b ~ .J ~I'.II ~" .- SIf: (I '~ ~) - --- ------- c; '" ... ... --- ~j l- Fr ~g, . .:J ~ ~ fu ~ .3 =:; /"' ~ ~.... '-1-_ , r-. \J i : I rl 0 ........ ) l- ~" o --t.- "' ~ . ." '" ~. '-' . () l1J l-:' L ~ .,- c.... 1--- r ,q -"'" .--' L...J -"'7 ,.-- ,-, '..> r- , ,-. ',J , LLI ~-) LLJ (l'; Exhi bit A SITE LOCATION Olson - Simple subdivision -- Till t I ~~._-- - --- ----; ---.- f~',' 8 ~~ :::l~ 00 (/)iR ........ -I 1)~1 I 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ . M.,.~ I '(~ l<<'/ ~ lU13 I. . ~ 0 I V '- I . I~. ) . ""1 .. I r.. 5b"'~ ~,~ ",.- '" . 0 II.... 4Z9 ' "~ _.., '.1 I -'?:.::. ~ ...J I <.:::':~) ~ I ~_l ~ T- ~ ~ 4& I O~ ~ I.... ~5 ~ ~~ .....~.>:... ~ (/) 0 ~ ~:::. .-/ ~ ~ ~: -..... r, "~:" .'.~::t I I r EAST '. ""'" ~ I I /,... " . .189.55'" '. ;-"::', If> "'! ..'56.55- >~~ l ~ ~ i <0", ~~"~; :':rl',\~<.~~~~~ ~ ~ <1~ &1\.;. ~ dd ,..' o I .A'lli. ~ ~.9 ~ 0 . (~I 86'sl'o '- ~ I~ <'. ~o ~~.""" cP~ ~ ~r.' f"" ~o I 0 (,\~.t~sr.'% Od ~... ,,:,:~I I ......~-<s+ 2'01 ;,... ~ :;" .. .....; 'N'l " "'l I . "'+ ~cf ~:-. . ~ j 11 '. ..Ift! ~ _ I _ ~ '. ". : ,00 4"''''-' J ,WEST..-r ..... .~:" :4:...... ' . . 113.06'" .-: . .,< I .0\ . ... . ......_,,4'!J l6.~5~:.:'.' .... ~ S .. . I ., '" c;;4 TG~r.E. ~.CIRCLE :'/"~,.X .--.---' "g ... 184.71...- on '0' .... r-.: ( WEST -.' N ". .. L': '~.100 -Wcsl ... ..(r I~~ ,\ ;~_. ~: ~ . ,,-,-" ~ oO~ ..;., ~: ~ ... oP .f'). ~ : l'" I-.: ~~,:~\.~~~\ : ~I ~ \" "V ~D' ll'l "-1 ~ c,{; -Y \D ~:II ~ \\ '''; ~ ,,0 OG~ ;.~~. ':"~ eV ,.,J.... L_~-r~- - -",-- ;/.: 1/\1' ,'-589040'26" W' -,,' I........ ..../ , Norlh and Soulh cenler r-i~'r\ . line of See 3Z S; . ~.o I "1".-. (""-'.r' ~ ~) ~'o I ':of: .:, : 1" ,';'-;': .. i~~: 0\: ' I' \......,. '-' .. ~..... . .... .: 429 '.':\ . \I) .3-----T-------26-roos---------r -- b'8 I ." .: .." :' 7. ~ \ I evCII. I I; if '..:. ,.. , '0 .1fI_ 4., ~ ~ ,EAST ... 488,65 .... .. 452.04'" I I 4 '..:. ( .' .- L: 9. G, line of ~4e #IIZ of r the /'IE/;4 of Sec. 32 '. ~...: !.~: . I: -- .......... r"'__ MAnRON.. If' Exhibit B PROPOSED DIVISION . . CITY OF SHOREWOOD MAYOR Robert Rascop COUNCI L Jan Haugen Tad Shaw Kristi Stover Robert Gagne ADMINISTRATOR Daniel J. Vogt ~ 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD . SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 . (612) 474-3236 "'" MEMORANDUM TO: PLANNING COMMISSION, MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: BRAD NIELSEN DATE: 10 APRIL 1986 RE: HARDING ACRES SECOND ADDITION FILE NO.: 405 (86.06) BACKGROUND Last year the City approved a subdivision called Harding Acres (see Site Location map - Exhibit A, attached). As you may recall a preliminary plat was approved for 18 lots. A final plat was then approved for the six lots having frontage on Wedgewood Drive and Smithtown Road. Network Development Inc. i~ purchasing the property, and has requested approval of a final plat for the remaining 12 lots. Since the Shorewood Subdivision Ordinance requires that final plats must be submitted within six months of preliminary plat approval, the project technically requires a new preliminary plat. As a practical matter, however, the plat is exactly the same as the one approved in 1985 (see Exhibit B, attached). RECOMMENDATION Since the plat is consistent with the previous approvals, it is recommended that both preliminary plat and final plat be approved subject to the following: 1. Approval of the plans and specifications for street and utility improvements by the City Engineer. 2. The applicant must submit an up-to-date title opinion for review by the City Attorney. 3. Park dedication fees ($500 per lot) must be paid prior to release of the plat. .. 4. The applicant's engineer must submit an estimate of the cost of constructing required improvements. w ;,f A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore I () ..~ . . Re: Harding Acres 2nd Addition 10 April 1986 5. Subject to the City Engineer's approval of the estimate, a letter of credit for 150 percent of the estimate must be provided by the applicant to ensure construction of the improvements. 6. It is recommended that the staff be directed to prepare a standard subdivision development agreement covering the above-mentioned items and including provisions for scheduling and inspection of improvements, reimbursement of City expenses, building permits, etc. This could likely be reviewed at the 28 April Council meeting. . 7. The applicant's engineer should prepare a detailed grading plan showing proposed elevations of building pads. Once this has been reviewed by the City Engineer, grading work may be commenced. BJN:ph cc: Dan Vogt Glenn Froberg Jim Norton Neil Lewis ~ _c' -: . - 2 - J1tt1. . ~ I . : .. -.i .. ( I , i t .. ~ -. -,- . . j ~I 0::, ::> WI LA. : I ~LA.li I BI i I I I 1- I .. I ............... ~ ~ ~(~ . 1 . ..L.. -- -- . . TONKA BAY -........ NDt'th I 1" =4o:J .. .. .. ., GLEN <( ....J => o t: z ~ RQ I I !RD. 1 . I 17.,0 <( -J II II LA. Exhi bit A SITE LOCATION Second Addition Harding Acres .. . HARDING (:."1 ~EY " Jo1.... ADO/ Road M.4NITOLJ :t !Ii .. .. . .0" . . o. ~;. ..- f Z "\~ · c; ~\\., ~.Y ,.",Q\ ,r rV 11.1 ~ ~ Q (.;: C/j lw -It: . Fl. l.. .S. 4'.:( NO. 1/9 '!! .. . !I 0 ; . .. .. . = 50 Q () o ~ ~ c laJ ':> ~ ~ :;:\ Ci It.. C:'; O!1! ~ 0:: "J.tI.4..... ~ ~ ::) L <1. G of. Ch ---- ::t: I V~v ~ --:::f:::~:", ~ ~ ..... ~_I - . -----=::_.~~ ~ ....---- ----, : F' If? r:.- 1-<' ..:l, ---- -;-- Exhibit B FINAL PLAT a"~' _a. ~: . _ _ _. ~ _.._ __.-.-. t _~, t :," ;; . : :",. SE~,. 'I I I GLEN d I ~~ ... .. . . . CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755J:;OUNTRY-CLUEl~ROAD.~HOREWOOU; MTNNESOTA 55331 . 16121 474-3236 MAYOR Robert Rascop COUNCI L Jan Haugen Tad Shaw Kristi Stover Robert Gagne ADMINISTRATOR Daniel J. Vogt MEMORANDUM TO: PLANNING COMMISSION, MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: BRAD NIELSEN DATE: 26 MARCH 1986 RE: CHRISTMAS LAKE ACCESS FILE NO.: 405 (85.29) BACKGROUND In September of last year, the City was approached by the Christmas Lake Homeowner's Association to accept the donation of a piece of property located on Merry Lane as a public access to Christmas Lake. After considerable study and lengthy negotiations between the Association, the DNR, Interstudy and the Shorewood City Council, an agreement was reached between all concerned parties to locate the access on a site immediately north of the originally proposed site owned by Robert Fayfield. In addition to the different site location, the access proposal has undergone considerable change from the original proposal. As proposed, development of the access site requires several zoning approvals from the City. These are enumerated in a letter to Frank Fallon, dated 19 February 1986 (see Exhibit A, attached). A letter trom Frank Fallon to members of the Christmas Lake Homeowner's Association, ~ dated 17 February 1986, summarizes the agreement which has been reached. A portion of that letter is attached (Exhibit B) for your review. ISSUES AND ANALYSIS In the initial review of the access proposal, several issues and concerns were raised by the Park Commission, Planning Commission and City staff. Nevertheless the City Council determined that it was in the public interest to enter into the agreement with the other parties. It is worth noting that an overriding factor in the Council's decision was that if the City did not accept the site, it would be donated to the DNR and the City would lose any voice it may have had as to how the site would be developed, operated or maintained. _,.,.....-:'_:=..:_:.7:~~'3;~dolrF:;~~." ~ir::t';r;;~7"~_).'i ~~:~ <:~'!t,:.~l!- , ..A Res7dentitlt4:ii~~.~ft~iiE"C'~'~~~;j~oc.: . . Re: Christmas Lake Access 26 March 1986 To a large degree, signing the agreement made the subdivision, conditional use permit and variance processes somewhat of a formality. Consequently rather than dwelling on the appropriateness of straying from zoning standards, this report will focus on site"sesign and making sure the access functions properly. In this regard there are several issues to be considered. A. Fayfield Property. There is one variance which should not be simply overlooked. The nonconforming structures on the Fayfield property should be removed as a condition of approval by the City. Although this parcel is no longer proposed as the access site, it is still involved in the conveyances between the Association, lnterstudy and the City. There are two reasons why it is recommended that the buildings be removed. First, the access proposal was originally "sold" based on the idea that despite the access being substandard in terms of zoning requirements, other nonconform- ities (the old buildings) would be eliminated. To quote the Association's original proposal: "At present there is a derelict single family home that will be removed as part of the site development...(The existing home is getting water from the neighbor's well on a temporary basis only.)" Secondly, since the property must be combined with the lnterstudy, the lnterstudy site would contain two principal uses on one lot. B. Site Design. The proposed site plan is shown on Exhibit C. Setting aside the variances necessary to accommodate the access proposal, it should be realized that the proposed site plan can't really be done much differently than shown. Fortunately it has been improved over previous plans, specifically: 1. Although lot sizes have not been included in the information submitted by the applicants, the new site is somewhat larger than the Fayfield lot. 2. The new site is closer to Radisson Road than previously proposed. This not only shortens the length of the access road, but will ultimately result ip less disruption of residential use at such time as the lnterstudy property is developed. ~ 3. The proposed access road has been widened. While it still does not conform with the SO foot minimum street width requirement, the proposed 30 foot width is better than 10 feet which was initially proposed. The narrow width has resulted in problems with backslope on the lnterstudy side. The DNR has gotten approval from lnterstudy, however, to encroach on their property somewhat in order to soften the grade. Consideration should be given to acquiring the additional 20 feet of right-of-way at such time as the lnterstudy property is developed. 4. Overall circulation has been improved. All parking spaces are in a pull-through design with adequate turning radii. ... 2... -- ~ ., ?~,~.~ .-!:.~~~-:_......:~__:._.:.-~~>"~:!'~-"-:h'"::'~-7{:j. '.:"0':''''.'''''';<;4,,,,r; ?-;~,.:..;;~~~~ .'f~':~'--c~ii~- ,. i "'_'.~..,~. l ~"if-~<'ffi-'~"-"-"""~> Re: Christmas Lake Access 26 March 1986 - 5. The parking lot and access road will be paved. Parking will be striped and the perimeter of the lot curbed on the easterly side and around center islands. 6. The parking lot will be broken up by the three landscaped center islands. Landscaping has been increased significantly. 7. Drainage has been accommodated as follows: a. In addition to curbing on the east side of the parking lot, the lot is sloped to the west so that virtually all runoff is directedito the grass ditch on the west side of the site. ,.1 b. From there the water is piped under the road to the center landscaped island which serves somewhat as a sedimentation basin. c. The water then passes through an oil skimming device before being piped under the parking lot into the lake. Scott Bracke, DNR, will attend the meeting on 1 April. Undoubtedly he will elaborate on the proposed design and be able to answer any questions which may be raised. C. Subdivision. The applicant's attorney is currently updating title op1n10ns for the properties involved. These must be submitted as quickly as possible to ensure that the subdivision/lot combinations can be recorded and that the City can receive clear title to the site in time for the proposed construction start (1 June). New property surveys and legal descriptions must be submitted as soon as possible in order for the Council resolution to be prepared on schedule. D. Landscaping. Proposed landscaping is shown on Exhibit E. The plan takes into consideration comments from both the staff and the Christmas Lake Association. As proposed, the landscape plan accomplishes the following: 1. The parking lot and toilet facilities are screened from the lake and from adjacent residences. . ~ 2. The combination of existing and proposed vegetation provides a physical buffer between the .access and adjoining properties. This is intended to ._ discourage encroachment from access users onto adjoining lots. -: Since the facility will be considered as a city park, the Park Commission raised some concern over maintenance of the facility. Commissioner Lindstrom later talked to another landscape architect regarding minimizing the amount of area which has to be mowed. It was suggested that some other kind of ground cover which requires less maintenance be considered. White clover, ground ivy or lamium, or some kind of Spiria, were suggested examples. Given the estimated annual cost of maintenance (see item E. following) these suggestions appear to have merit. . '.~ - 3 - -".__.'".......-..~'".""-~-.' - ,.' ..~.--<_._._..- ----..~...- ... . . ~ .....-:...=-""~~".!...'-:._."";,. '.-"'" ..._-. "'. "" ".':~;, >'-~, " --. -- '.. ,"' ..- .....-- ><. ',. .-.... .~. , ,;' ''.:::<<':!'i:';;''.':;;;;~:-'~;,-/i;.;:;.,i~> ..~~..' , I ~~:!L=~;,;~=~c:t~r~- J '1 ".~~~,..,:a~',;;~,.'-_-:: ----'o~.,~',_.,~-,.;':: I Re: Christmas Lake Access 26 March 1986 E. Maintenance. In signing the agreement the City Council agreed to own, operate and maintain the access facility. Early estimates relative to annual maintenance costs were as high as $8,000. While these were considered at first to be unusually high, a recent estimate by the Public Works Director indicates that maintenance could run somewhere between $6,000 and $8,000. Maintenance costs include trash patrol and disposal, satellite toilet rental, mowing, sign replacement, snowplowing, and striping, sealcoating and patching of the access road and parking area. Obviously these costs will necessitate an adjustment to the current City budget. f' F. Engineer's Comments. The Engineer's comments are contained in his ~eport, dated 11 March 1986 (see Exhibit D, attached). While most of the issues raised therein have been resolved, the road design is still a topic of debate. DNR proposes a two inch thick, bituminous road surface. The City Engineer proposes a three inch thick surface. Given the projected maintenance costs already discussed herein, it behooves the City to consider this issue carefully. It should be realized that the road serves two residents to the south and therefore will experience snowplow and garbage truck traffic. Possibly, if DNR is unwilling to comply with the recommendation of the City Engineer, they would be willing to compromise by sharing in the cost of maintenance for some specified period of time. G. Shoreland Impact Plan. Most of the areas of concern have already been 6iscussed in other sections of this report (e.g. screening, stormwater runoff, landscaping). The only item which has not been addressed is erosion control during and after construction. During construction a silt screen will be placed along the entire length of the site. Disturbed areas which will not be paved will be sodded to prevent erosion. RECOMMENDATION Approval of the, access proposal should ,be subject to theJollowing:__ 1. Substandard buildings on the Fayfield property should be removed within some specified period of time. Ideally this would occur in conjunction with the access site <;9nstruction.__ 2. The Fayfield-property should be legally combined with the Interstudy site. 3. The small parcel --to be conveyed to Paul Ellwood must be legally combined with his property north of the access site. - 4 - ;:~"':;::-~~2i~~],~~::::=;r-i:?~i~E.~~~g::,;::,::'::" ... . . . ...... w.__" ...._, _., .. ., ., ~A'. _-_:;';">,"~,o iiE;.c: , ";':\"'e'i~\i~~~~;~;~~~~-;~;~~;;;':;~ .=f:- -0.-. I -:~;~~~~:h:., ,:~:-:;.;;.:: C;ifi'7~.~~~ =~,'L,;;;;;;:;.:'~-,'~-:';=-.;;,~~~7~,;;:~-':~-~:";-;:~;TJIiIIO'~:-- C', ",,:c- _ :-;:-- .~~::;, .:.",,- '''~~''.i'~ .-. Re: Christmas Lake Access 26 March 1986 4. The applicants must submit up-to-date title opinions, new surveys and new legal descriptions of the reconfigured parcels. 5. Other types of ground cover should be considered for the center islands and easterly borders of the parking area. 6. The City should require the access road to be constructed in compliance with the recommendation of the City Engineer. BJN:ph cc: Dan Vogt Jim Norton Glenn Froberg Frank Fallon Steve Bruce Margaret Hottinger Scott Bracke Robert Fayfield Paul Ellwood .~ r ;;'-::---._ - 5 - :-.~-;" '=::'.::::-" 1. ;;.~-__ _ ~..._~}f,t4:1_i ~.?',1~:~'.::L..:':-_-' ";'7-i;-~~-;",,,',," _ U~~.~-~.:~~~ i.:":-.-'~NC1l..- -- Jan Haugen Tad Shaw Kristi Stover Robert Gagne ADMINISTRATOR Daniel J. Vogt , . . .- -....--. '---'~~-"'~'-- - . CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD . SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 . (612) 474-3236 19 February 1986 Mr. Frank Fallon 1050 Holly Lane Shorewood, Mn 55331 Re: Christmas Lake Access Proposal Dear Frank: As you are aware Dan Vogt and I met with representatives of DNR and Interstudy on 12 February to discuss the preliminary design plans for the Christmas Lake access. Based on those plans it will be necessary for the City to grant the following approvals: 1) subdivision; 2) conditional use permit; and 3) several'variances. Due to the number of parcels of property involved, I have attached a map which identifies the subject parcels for (hopefully) easier reference. Following is a more detailed explanation of the necessary actions plus the required information necessary for each approval: 1. Subdivision/combination. It will be necessary to divide Interstudy B fDom Interstudy A then legally combine B with Interstudy C. Also the Fayfield parcel must be combined with Interstudy A. For this purpose we'will need surveys and legal descriptions of all the existing parcels, including the locations of all structures, easements, etc. We will then need new surveys of all the resulting parce ls. In addition you must submit current (within the last 30 days) title opinions for all the affected properties. Finally~ the enclosed application form must be signed by all involved property owners. 2. Conditional Use Permit (C.U.P.). This is required for the development of a substandard lot and is subject to the provisions of Section 200.04, a copy of which is attached. ReqyJ..red information is specified thereiJl ~n-dhas been highligh~ed for your Leference. - .. ," . While much of the required information it is important that a-separate plan be impact plan". This plan should include drainage, grading, filling, excavation, and site vegetation. can be consolidated Qn the same drawing(s), submitted and desigllated as a "shoreland information on both existing and proposed temporary and permanent erosion control A copy of this section was given to the DNR representatives. Exhibit A-1 SUMMARY OF REQUIRED ZONING ACTIONS Letter to Frank Fallon, dated 19 Feb. '86 A Residential Community on Lake - -- ~- t,. J t / \ \ \ > .........,] '" 'rllll T ,~- o. 120 ~mrJJ'/ 10) i... f, ( CHRI UK' (\~) 151 f6.yfaLlJ . C tf"IS1~_~_~S ..",. ...... ~, ~: ~'" , . -- ..... - -- Exhibit A-4 " #" f.' . ;'-~--lo;;DAI~.~-ASSOC!A""IOll-~c..u ~--,_.,. 6280 Ridge Road Chanhassen, Mn. 55317 February 17, 1986 Dear Neighbors, The purpose of this letter if three fold: first, to describe the settlement we finally reached with DNR concerning the public access: second, to thank the many people whose efforts made this settlement possible: and third, to request your financial suppoft ., to help pay the remaining costs. 1) The Settlement. As you probably read in the newspaper, on January 30th we signed an agreement with DNR and the City of Shorewood providing for a donated pUblic access on Merry Lane, and the DNR dismissed its condemnation proceedings against the former Christmas Lake Motel property. We also signed an agreement with Interstudy the day before, providing for an exchange of property between Bob Fayfield and Interstudy and for the granting of the necessary roadway easement by Interstudy. In summary, the agreements contain the following provisions: The Fayfield property will be donated to Interstudy. (at 5695 Merry Lane) ~roperty owned by Interstudy Oh th~ eQ~L &~de of Merry Lane, north of the Fayfield parcel and south of Paul Ellwood' s cabins., will be donated to the City (or possibly the State) for the public access.. The public access will contain a concrete boat launching ramp (at the south end of the parcel) and parking spaces for seven cars with boat. t.railers. The access will be designed and built by QNR at its expense (estimated by them at $50 - $75,000). Ad$quate screening is to be provided from adjacent properties. Exhibit B-1 SUMMARY OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN CHRISTMAS LAKE HOMEOWNERISASSOCIATION, DNR, INTERSTUDY ~~D SHOREWOOD CITY COUNCIL . _ - --"":'~_l~~~...;;1...~I,,~:,~~~;:~-th~'---'- ._~.::.~-~.,~ Association by March 1st for review and comment, and requests for a conditional use permit and necessary zoning variances will be submitted: and considered promptly thereafter. (If all of the necess.ry approvals are not granted by May 1st, the property will be donated to the state instead of the city.) If the city grants the necessary zoning approvals, the access site will be donated to the city, who will own, operate, and maintain the access subject to the agreement with DNR. If the site is donated to the state, DNR will , enter into an agreement with the city under which the ~ city will operate and maintain the access. In either event, the access will be free and open 16 hours a day, between the hours of 4:00 A.M. and 10:00 P.M., and may be closed only in emergencies or with ONRls approval. Interstudy will grant a 30 foot roadway easement (to either the city of the state) across its property so that Merry Lane can be widened and improved to the south end of the access. An amendment to the restrictions contained in Interstudy's deed will be recorded, increasing from seven to ten the number of dwelling units which may be built on their property. (This does not change the existing zoning requirements.) In addition, the Board of the Association has agreed to support certain changes in Interstudy's conditional use permit, if requested within the next five years. Construction is expected to start about June 1st and to .. be ,completed by--July 31st. For seven boating seasons, all boats launched at the public access will be subject to a limitation of not more 2S horsepower motor size. (No limit. is imposed on residents. not using the public access to launch their boats.) Thereafter, boats launched at the public access will be subject to the same limits (if any) that residents are subject to. ~-. .~~~-:~-:. ::::::-:~-~:-:-;--=--;: ::-~-~-'"'''" . -~' -~.. -":.- ~ '..- ~ . '..,; r Exhibit B-2 i 1 . . .,., . .~.::;;. .~'. c.~:~;.._.._~:.~ l' " ~~;:- 'J' - '-OVenll-,. the:: laeml)e:t.-=O~~-eur.:'BOa~~~s ~_..-r~~_'t.~~=""..~~.,,'.:.._-- who have been working on this issue believe that this is about as favorable a resolution of ~his matter as we could possibly have obtained under the circumstances. Si~ce~~ obtained w~itten consents to.~he change in Interstudy's deed from the oWners of 93 parcels ,.of lakefront property, I take -it that virtually all of _._ I' ". - -.' ._." . ~ the residents agree that this is as least a satisfactory resolution of this longstanding issue. 2) Appreciation On behalf of myself and all of the other residents, I would like to thank those people whose special efforts made , this settlement possible: J Bob Fayfield, Steve Bruce, Heidi Lardon, Harvey MacKay, Frank Beddor, all of the investors in the Merry Lane property, (Jim Bruce, Wally Dayton, Bob Fayfield, Bill Gullickson, Don Larson, Carol Arin MacKay, Denny Mathison), and Chuck Dayton (our attorney). On behalf of the city, the entire City Council (especially Bob Rascop and Tad Shaw) and staff (especially Dan Vogt and Brad Nielsen). On behalf of Inters.tudy, its Board of Directors (especially I Dick Slade and Tom HOlloran) and staff (especially Jeanne McGee and Margaret Hottinger) and Paul Ellwood (even though he is no longer officially associated with Interstudy). On behalf of the state, those members of .the Executive Council (especially the Governor, Joan Growe and Bob Mattson) and the staff of the Governor's office (especially LYnn Anderson) and DNR (especially Steve Thorne) who worked hard" to"' -achi-eve ....2Fll1Utual1y=accep'table,cs~lemen1:--ofcthis-, -..:-0.... issue. I would also like to express my special appreciation to Bernice- andHBortonBrooks',-whounderwent a very long and difficult ordeal during this process. They consistently said they did not want to sell to DNR, and in fact turned down a very attractive offer from DNR during the last week of our negotiations. In addition, we should remember the sacrifices being made by Bob and Carol Anderson, Paul Ellwood and Pat Elliott, the other property owners ( who will be most affected by .the public access. I I Exhibit B-3 ~.~~.M~ Wffi\~:'~CC(c~~~ "..1......... . ..-- -- -:~- ~~::_~__-:-,~:~-,,-~~=-.L---- ~-'-~.___..~_~~~_- i ~ ~~..~_ ~l"i.,..., ':I '. -. \ \ " ~._. \~'" ;.~~:~:~.~.= .;~ :.::. ~;-: -- .' ..- I . .,. i \ ) ~7- i" ~ .'.,~ ~\ \ --.-- _..._~;.,.,., -.. ~ -~...:...::::~"=~--'~.-... r -..,.'-,.",------0.,--..,..-,.. -- t------=-~--.:-~:::::~~':-"':.-~::..,~.:;--: .. . . .. . "';/ ./ / J'- , " t.' /~ :, . j!,. ".,-". ~~ ~.. ..~ ,,::~" . ,..,,~. ~~ - ,/ . ,. ~ .'17 ~. i"Va;t> t?lhlU~ ~. Qf' ~~ .r:1f' -rtte--~ r ..'/ " ~" ~ Of' ~e.. j:.\':".~~. \1_\03 ',- ...~." "~. , t",,'o .~'~\ -\ '..... - \ \\ ~ ,.".. '11- ;~ .-=:;.. L~_ . _MMVt e.nuH~ 1tI ee. ~ Ii '"* ~ 17 1ft\:..~ ~'JU. ~ u::r1' .. ' ~ lit' lCI4ltl'l" IA' LU1" ~' ~ .,' LUr .' ~ ColJ' ~ (,6' IClA'Hl' ..' Lm ..' 1QtltI'f' n' flIIdl'l' .... Il\l6rtl'f ..... Ill4Itt'l" .,' l.fltl' t' A!rH'f" ..' l.et1" .,. <<IIrftf G' IClMt1' ,.' Ltrf" .' trWr 417' flUItl1" 40' tw.ttr .... ~ .' FWot\'f' ",' L.a'r .,' L.m" ... lfWl'f f6>' tIWfl' 11' Nli'1U: ~-~ ~ _~),.,~ ~ ......, eoa- , ~ 1t7 ~ i'tIP t:iI'N1f!h ~ " ~ 1llehe. ~ AAI7 ~~ WftI/lIC. tiN.1lfHo ~ ~ eur ~ I'Pr L.lM11l!-O 1Zi'= rvaH!:N1' t1f' ~ ~j ~"'~.~;~ .w~j AIlCe> 4-~)_ t.J..Hh ~ ~ &o6ej e>~ ~.. ~j "'!J:;lI&.e!:r ~) "...... ~j ~ r$. 1He Dr<<. ~ ee.. ~ 11;:7 ~-' WI11i L.l1lJ..rI'{ ~ 'MfH ~ "'}Iff ~~~1l1c:.~~. 1He:-~~~~ ~ f't7lt "ffiM. ~. ~~ ~ Cti 1HI+ rt.H+ I'fle 117 1't1e 1W ~ 1HC- ~~~c.~~~~ - CIfZ. ~ OP ~. ~1e: rvrifh AIC7 ~4r ~ pt;;:tL 1l'Ic:. .....". ~1Qi ~ ee ~ rH -ne. ~ -.n- It.Wr ee. ~. JltiD ~ f'( 1tC ~ f'\Ir:;t"I.-nte M~~~'L. ~-,. ~ I'H. J'll.L. ~ ~ tItllWU"" -0 ~ 1Ht- ~ ~ ee-~ rx 1Hc:. ~ "'" . wr Ii ~ j \ ~ e..~ Jt;INf ~ I '\'" \ -. - \. I-r I . "" O+c;:a&. U" t . a. 0+16 ...,. t IL O+~ . ...,. 4 . a. 0+41 Lt' . . a.. 0+40 U' , . ~ 17.. '160 IF 1 . a. t7 + .... Lt' l5 . IL t7+ .... Lt' ., . a.. 1 +.". Lt' 10 . a.. t+1O t.MO . IlL t . "" llr. \. .. a. P+I9 "" Z. . IL () +4f? " , a. 0+1") " 4- . a. 0+ 7IJ IQ" ., . r:a.. 0+<<1 Ill" (. . IL I dO Ill" 7 . a. I +!l& II:r' IS . IlL I+C Q" ., "" 1 +4't Ilr 10 tt.. t+<< IlP' II . el. t+o;. Ilr J2. . a- tI'll Ill'" ~ . a- t + " '" 14 . a. t+'-l u.i tlt'I . fl. , +16 1:>>. tIf'l .. IlL. 1+41 '* at't. !L 1+- ~Qft.. a. l+~ ~.~~ ,., . ~ ft1lItr "".~L."" " r~'-' ~ t: ~ ~,ou. ~ ~~~~ UM~ , \ .:. ~:~,'~: /- ,."..-........' \______ 11' . - ~ ~ Pr e:c.-rz. c.u.____ ~ ~ A J?' -- ~ !.. 4117Ti'oL.: . - . f CHIUSTA'.S LAKE .. s (I.Ev 9J2,"(1"1~."1 ttA;u"_t "~'I!\rIAR" IU~I. _it" Et.Ev. 912." 274- A:"1E3 -.' ~~- f\lIltIIMt!tlC> ~ ^ t;..,,; ~ l"eNte c;tt I'Ii 6~6 ~ ,.. ^~ trIP v.TTl1 ^ J?' wu;e ~ fVotII(. m-r ", ee. t+'JliIU.tO U1 ~ 'Ml}t ~ ~~~.J,~II.U.. ~ 40-0( . .-1~1 tt.e.I. ""'-40 .---y--- --- -.. .~ _ _ __~IIY_M-.-- _Y'_6_Y_._~ __ _ LA.... __6;' .._a. Hr'(lI:;NU) - ==-J-~ - - - ........ ... - -...-.............: ~ .. ""-~ ........ . .,. .. .~ I , , i '- ~: Ii. ]I( .... - ~1Me. (>..- t.AU~ ~ 1Jlte.1P e:e ~ H\jlt\ ""'"' \QN "..,..,. tKWT\tiIlr toH1J:iUIE. (~ ,.) ~~ ~ &If" ~ I1tf/1;Pr "",-\1 ~ J.:- ~ i".?~ -.-li ';:1 fI" _i" '~-' - , i~ - - ?C;,'", 7~~f; to' 40 l~ ., c;;-ZL i'..".'.'., .... /n , ----- ::~"U ,~ Ft:zr <~~ . III\)" ..~PE F Oil Ilt-', 'tP~..; ~C':' ~ .OP.,)Gtt...PI41: ';'7.rf,J~ II". MAN....:;..I:. p. L . DIPARlMINt. Of NAtURAL RnOURCI5 T Exhibit C PROPOSED SITE PLAN j,! ~ > <III , . . "^ ",' > i .' I !": L, : " q I' , , ~. ~--l . .~ '.' t" rli ,> ~ ;1 ";>; ;1(J~ :, ~' our ~--),H :; I! .t " c..t --= - uS ~ 15 I d:I - c::>> Ill: Ii . - ~. ::a:: c..:It rn . a: !i :. ~ ~ 01 ~ - .. .~ !of) - ~t5 - l.lj ;::...; .I:. ~!.b v ~ e.. .S: :::I - ~(J) :E lI)"t; !:::. - <::> ... u~ .~ . ..,. .' '-' e.. enO cuo v_ e....... :::J o .c:: \0 en,fol "It CUe.. - a::::J an o an 0-..... C:_ .... e.... _ e..:::J'O ,fol cu+t- 0 cu_o en c: :z: a:: cu .... c: 0.... cu c: c:0+t - W ,fol :E ,folCU ....c:~ .. 01.... :; ~~!fRl~ CU_ e.. 0.0)( . :::JcuoO+t CX!ot.nCX!V) ., ~ V - e.. cc +t ~ ~ . e.. :E .. c: +t :c I .... ,. cu a:: c: - - 0.. en en cu V :J. V .... - .I:l C. : - ...J en - E +t en .,.. e.. .It:. Co.) .. cu a:: cu "" - .r::. "0 c: .., ~ 01 - .. CO N ~ - :::J c.. .I:l cu ..... 'i ,fol - "0 en c: - - 0. .... o ,fol cu en .. cu ~ V - e.. CX! ~ lG c: .... e ..- - cu e.. 0. .. en cu+t .r::.C: +tl "08 Iv CUo "-c: "".... cu~ e..o cu- >- ..,0 .r::..... cu cu.r::. 3+t . e.. E e.. lG cu o . "0 en +tcuen :J_ cu 0_ V e..lGV +tlG o ~.. +t..-JI/. 'UCU. C:.I:l- lG "0 cu .,_.c:: ....:::J+t .,..0 en~,! cuc:- .I:. 0 'U +t""lG ene l!en _en. +tCUv e:v..- cuv> "O.e.. .... 1111 CU'" o~ +t :;!..,.... "0 V . cu..-::c -- . -.I:lt- -:::J . +t 0. en '" c:ccu - ;c .+t .!~4I- -0 "0'" -cuc: ='.c:: 0 O+t- z: ,fol "'c:V ",0= c:~e.. oocu _._+t '" 41- e: - ~~. .... .....r::. . ....41-...."0 -- - e..e..,folO t-+t.e.. . - '" 1:! I >- a o c ..- &:. V c =' . - .... .3 . N a .... )( &1 c> +t 1 :i. .... '" . .Q -c j '" V .... .... .... - . e..o +tc: ..... +t! -;1:7 'U &; .. N '" f ..... .."-0 --,. ---. v . :::J.V ....=i. 00 - &"c..- . u. "" \0....';"; e...c1:7 .... ""c..c..&.. o~o.. . .- Vl u ::J . .e: t;'01 t; ~ :::J ::I '" .. ... !u;- 0.0"0 ce..e:- .... ..... !81~ ..--.... - -- U .I:li.l:l. . .t; NJ :::J ...,~" .... c: Ie: en 0" ::J .c:: 0 .. c g_~E -..e..::J t;. ~ .-....I:l ..,. ..8. 4o)-......N :.1. e..en .I:. .. ~ t- ..,.- . fE - lIItj . III .... .... v.- .. _ 0 c:....Vl 0..- 0-' ,..c..E <lilt .. CIt ,.. :'siB ~&n'Z-<IIlt . ~ i ..; ~.. i. .E' .... ..I '.il _.. tJ.1 0.... .- ... tI. Oil: ... """. , .N.... .0 :I a- .... -- > .....:1} o .'lIIt &;.c 1~ 1.... ....) . 0.... .... t- 1- ...5 ... _c.. .G. ..... ...., . ~.~. ... - . .i~l< :!i WI. '/'. 2.. . ,_.<,'" ... ..' i"'." . S IQ. ,.., . ... ! · ""'J" . :wt z: . .';' C ....i: ..1;. "Z:e.\! c.. . .." o III U ca.... . ... ll: --- _....c .-- -5:: . ..a: · . ......... i > .c:- c: ... c 0- -"""JiI: g~=2 ._,..u ....;.. .. )-1:. it!! ...to ..0 ... ..... .. " .... ......i';~ 'izl~ .c: .. U :I Uut-U :':;01. . '.- . .':"1 Q. i'~;: , -t-;t '. .,;'; l~ _u.o ... '. U 'f!JlI ..., 0... .~ . ...- 0 ... .. R'~ ,foll~~' ..' o. ! ... . ~ I.. J &.1-0 ;. _ '. ,~:;;.:...' . ;"'_ _..,......". .."~..;....;......~..,,'_,:~~.;..,. '_____.~.1f";"" ....'.'>ii,.:;....,-....,.,C_ ."~..:",_....~,~~"-,-r,,,,;..!.",.'" '-, Page Two Mr. Scott Bracke March 13. 198& 7. A trash rack should be installed at the upstream end of Culvert No.1. along with aprons on the other ends of the culverts. . 8. Flow lines could be shown on the bituminous parking lot plan sheet to help the contractor during construction. If you have any questions or comments, please feel free to contact us. Sincerely, I ~ ORR.SCHELEN.MAYERON & ASSOCIATES, INC. ;' \ .~. i " <:;::-:1. _ \) J.t....... '" ! ,." ~n" James P. Norton, P.E. Associate MSM:mlj cc: Mr. Brad Nielson. City of Shorewood , ;~~~~~~~1I~~i~.rl~il . : . . . . . . . . . : . . . . . . : . . . . . . . . . : . .. . . . . . . . . : . . . . . . . . . : ... . . . : . . . . . .'. . . : . . . . o. ". . '. ,', I : . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : . . . . . . . . . : II . . "1..1(', . . ...:.........: . ...:.........:.... 1,1... r; .;.; .;.;.;.;.;.; y .:.;.;. :.:.;.; .:' :+:.:. ':':'1':':':';':':':':' :'i .:.:. :.:.:.:.:.: .:. ....... .............. .'..... . : : : : j : : : : . ! : : : : : : : : : j : : : : :.: : : : . . : : : : : ~ : : . : : : : : : : i : : : : : : : ~ : : :'~++~'H'+H'i'H': ..:.:.::...::.....::.:::~:.. ':: :':':':':':':'I'~'~'~'H'~'H'~' . . : . . .. ....: "c . . : . . . . . . ',.4 ; j:' : :~ll;Jlr,11:~lt'nf:: : ;.;.;.;.;.;..... . ;:lI'ul'I'.rli.I' . . ..'{.... . :.. .' . ~. . . . ... . . :.: . \;:.:.:.: .: .:.:.:~:.:.:.:.:+:.:.... .:.:~~.:. .: :-:~.:.;.:+:+:.:.:.:.:.:.:. . ..t!...: : . . : . . . : . . . . · . . . . \t . . '1 . 's . .' ". . : . . . . .. o. . . . . "l . . "u . . '.: .. '.' . '..i' . . X::.: :::::::.::::: . : . .....~ .:.:.:.u.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.u.~.~.~.~l~.i.~~.~. : : :: : : : : : : : :: :::: ::.: : : : : . ~1IIU'" r .~.. :.:::::::: : : .::':.:.:.:.\::.: .:.:.~.~.:.~.:.,.).~.!.~l.\::.:. : : : : : : : : l : 1 : : : : :: : : :' :.. :.: .:.~:._.:.::.i.:.~.:.~.~.~. ~.~.:.;.;.:.:.:.:.:.:.u.l.l.l.un.tu. .: :-h ~,; :., :J . . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ \ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ \ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ \ ~ ~'l ~. ~ ~ ~. ~ ~ ~. ~ ~ 1ti/HL:. : i:: ~: T1m:0: I ~:: ~: ~::; I;:::::::: I~:::: i::: ~f."..".._'_\." ... ... .....:......... ..........:.............0.0...:.........0.. .......:.... .0..........0.":......0... .0.. ..... 1~lltl.i..,!:11.\.~I.~.\,).j'i~'; : .;';'; : :':"':< ~.I,\"um!u.u\u.luu.lum!I.l.lll'l.luuou!umluu.u:m:.\.uu.tu!t,:::"uol.l"'I.:um;m;.: t1~Hm~rnnm~~HH~ T Jrm~~: HH:n~)~) nnH~n: :H~H: [:~! ~: ~:: [~Hl[:: ::::: ~r \:::: :~: .. ....-......"1...1.................................................................. ..........~....~....~l2tdlf.e....... ............ ..... .... ....... ........ .' .'. h :::!::;:::::: ~ : : : : : : : : : 1 : : : : : : : : : 1: : : : : : : : : i : : : : : : : : : i : :: : :: : : : i : : : : : : : : : ~ : : : : : : : . : 1 : : : :: :-: : : . . ~.' . -. '~H . .... ~.... . . . . . . . : . . . . . . . .It{. "'.- . . : . . . . . . . . . : . . . . . ;j!i' . : . .~.. . ~. . . .' . ,~........~..~................. .(.D.:.a.................. ..... .0. ...... . ' . .,. .. .. ... . . . , \ ~ :~: )C:( :~ : : : : : : : i : : : : : : : : . : : : : : : : : : : i : : : : : : : : : i : : : : : : : : : i : : : : : : :.: : i : : : : : : :.: : . ... , ., ;. .. ".. ..... ... . . . . .. , . . . . . . .... .a:. J&.t.~' 004.40d"_ . ~ . . .. .. .-.' . . ...,..,..... . . ~... . . . ...:. ._,......:.........:.. _,_.....:.......... J,.,'''. ~,-,~.;-,".."""'.--i-..,.-';if...~'.,.,;'FV'"~......'.....: . . · i . . . . . Ii'. . ',: . . ...0. '. . . . : .-., . . . o' . . o' : . . . . . . . .~ . . . . . . . . : . . " '.- . . . . : . . . . . . . . . : . . . . . . . . .' : . . . . . . '.' . .....:...................:...................:...................:............... . ...~..~..~...........~4!IJi...:....'!I. .~......~.............. . :.~ . ~. ~ : : i :: : : : : : : : ~ : : : : : : : : : 1 : : : : : : : : : 1 : : : : : : :: .:::...:.::.::...... i : : : : : : . . : ~ : : '.: . .': : : i . . : : : : : ~: ~.c~' . . . . . r. . . . . . . . . : . . . . . . . . . : . . . . . . . . . : . . . . . . . . ~ . . ~~. ~. . . . .. . : . . '5. Hr... ~....... ". . ,-. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . .. . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. ........... ~ir:,:'::::: i::::::::: i::::::::: i::::::::: i:::::::: w:: ~ :~:~::: :1]:: 1: :e': HI'::: 1......::::::: .. I ,~...1 .... . . . : .. . ~.. ...... . . . ;. . . . . . .. . . . : .'. .' . .. .' . . . : . . . . ,;, . . . . : . . . . . . . . . : . . . . .. .. . . . :. . . . . . . . .. . : ... . . . . . . . : . '. ... .' . . . . . I. .. P. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ . . _ ....~.._. OUt,.,.....' .~,;~ . . . . . . . ... . . . . ~ UII" . . _.l w . . . . . .~..;.................: ...................:.. ................ .:. .... ..............:........... ... ... =--..... ~.. P1MoCI'...-............:............,......:....:J;'. .rr....... ...... :w.wM. ........... .. ~ ~ ..". . ... . . : . . . . .... . . . i . . . . . . . . '. : . ... . . . . . .. : . . . . . . .- "'" : . . . '. . . . . . : . . . . . . . . '.: .'. . . . . .. . . : . . .. . . . .. . . : .. . . . . . ...... ....,............................."..... .. .. .. .. . ............. 'A.~ I'~' H&j,o_... . . . . '/I!!.. . .. .II~.~~ . . ~...... ..:.).tI . . ".. .. . : . . . . . . . . .: . . . . . . . . . : . . . . . . . . . : . . . . . . . . ". . . II'-....~.. :'CY1:f1.1". ............... : . .. . . .. ..,. . : .. . ~.~ . :,.,......;. . . ... . .. i.... _.. 'I ... . . i . . . . . ...... . . : . . . . . . . . . : . . .. . .. . .. .. . : . . . . . .. .. .. . : . . . .. . . . . . : . . . . . . . . . : .. .. . . .. . . 6 6 .! 6 .. - -- -- .... . . _:. ~ . . . . . . .. . :1" ~~':~:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ~::~:~:::::::::::::, J ,. Ii. " . . " " : . . . . . . " " . : . . . . . . . .. .. : .. . . . . . . . . : . . . . .. . . . . : . . .. . . . . . . : . . . . . . . . . : . . . . . .1 : : :.: : :.: : : : ~ : :.: : : : : : : ~ : : : : :': : : : 1 : : : : : : : : : ~ : : : : : : : : : 1 : : : : : : : : : ; : : : : : : : : : ~ : : : : : : ExM bi t E LANDSCAPE PLAN ;~f -'~Jc__-- L' ~;: ... .. t . . . . . " . . . : .. . ... . . ". . . ~! : : ~~~ : :: : : : : : : : : : :: : . i ..' .'. . . ., . . i " . . . '. . . . . .:.........:......... : !.: : :.: : : : : : !: : : :: ~ : :.: .... ... . . . ........ ..:..........:.... ........ .:...........:. . ... . . ... .:. ... . . . .. . . . : . .... ............ .. . . .... ............. . . ... .. ... !It ....... .. . . . . . ..,....! . ............. . ............. . ............. . . ... . . .. .. . . . .. . . .............. ... ..... ... ...... . .... """ ........... . ............ . ........... . ........... . . '1 . .1 .. i :. .. ..::.:: . . . . . .. CITY OF SHOREWOOD MA YOR Robert Rascop COUNCI L Jan Haugen Tad Shaw Kristi Stover Robert Gagne ADMIN ISTRA TOR Danie~ J. Vegt 5755 COJJNTRY CLUB ROAD . SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 . (612) 474-3236 MEMORANDUM TO: PLANNING COMMISSION, HAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: BRAD NIELSEN DATE: 24 MARCH 1986 RE: LEIFERMAN, BAYLON - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND SETBACK VARIANCE FILE NO.: 405 (86.07) BACKGROUND Mr. Baylon Leiferman has requested a building permit which would allow him to tear down his existing garage and replace it with a room addition. He would then propose to build a new detached garage at the rear of the existing house. Since the house, which is located at 5775 Grant Lorenz Road (see Site Location map - Exhibit A, attached), does not comply with the setbacks of the R-1A zoning district, any expansion or structural alteration requires a conditional use permit pursuant to Section 200.03 Subd. lK. of the Shorewood Zoning Ordinance. As can be seen on the attached site plan (Exhibit B, attached), the applicant's current garage encroaches on the property immediately north of it by approximately five feet. The existing garage would be torn off back to the existing house. This would leave the existing structure approximately 7.5 feet from the property line. He then proposes to add a small room to fill in the northwest corner of the building. Since the house is already closer to the street than the R-1A district allows (approximately 40 feet instead of 50), the room addition represents an increase in the nonconformity. For this reason the applicant has requested a setback variance. ISSUES AND ANALYSIS This is considered a difficult request to try and explain verbally. Hopefully, the attached drawings will make it easier to understand. It is also difficult to separate the variance from the C.U.P. in this case. However, since the C.U.P. does not do the applicant much good without the variance, the variance will be addressed first. A Residential C-omrrHifflt~sktr.Minnekmka'3 $euth .SOOre- / dZ.._. . . Re: Leiferman, Baylon 24 March 1986 A. Setback Variance. As shown on the attached building plans, the applicant proposes to build a small room addition in the northwest corner of the house. While the addition will be jogged in to comply with the 10 foot side yard requirement on the north side, it will line up with the existing front of the house which is approximately 10 feet too close to the front of the lot. There is a provision in the Zoning Ordinance (see Section 200.03 Subd. 3d.) which allows a reduced setback where adjoining structures are closer to the street than zoning requirements might otherwise allow. As can be seen on Exhibit B, Mr. Leiferman's house lines up with both the house to the north and the house to the south. It is therefore considered consistent with the Zoning Ordinance to approve the variance. B. Conditional Use Permit. One of the requirements for granting a C.U.P. to expand a nonconforming structure is that the nonconformity should not be increased. The preceding paragraph addresses the justification for variance from this requirement. Mr. Leiferman's plans bring the house more into conformity with regard to side yard requirements than what currently exists (instead of encroaching on the property to the north, he will create a 7.5 foot side yard). Ideally, the structure would have been brought back to the 10 foot requirement. However, to do so would result in potential structural problems due to the location of footings. It is worth mentioning that Mr. Leiferman is negotiating with the owner of the 20 foot strip north of his property to purchase all or part of the strip. This would result in complete conformity with side yard requirements. RECOMMENDATION Mr. Leiferman's request is considered reasonable and consistent with the prov1s10ns of the Shorewood Zoning Ordinance. The current encroachment of his garage makes a strong case for requiring surveys with building permits. Despite the variance involved, the overall plan improves the conformity of the property to Shorewood zoning requirements. It is therefore suggested that the Planning Commission view the applicant's request favorably in making their recommendation to the City Council. BJN:ph cc: Dan Vogt Glenn Froberg. Jim Norton Baylon Leiferman - 2 - I ,~ II I I I __ !l\....'\tJ --t -- -r- - -i-- I I ! I I ,---- eo -- -- -- -- V)l3~n3 :3 r' <( ---- -J ~--------- IJJ ----------- ...s:l a: -J -~ ~ ...; - -- - 0 0 }~ ~ -J " I >- ----- ~ z ~ \\ '" >- U) ~~ . \ Mjl^ MO?V3W - - - -~ ~ " -- - -- ----~. -J ~ ~ r --~~ ~ - - IJJ U) . . 0 ~~~ ~ a:: I \ ~, ~~ "\. I~ s~~"''"\~~ , ~ ~ ~~ x C\~. 1::/ .~ 'I nunu_____ r;\ ~:v 0 tJ, 0~ ')~ ~ I ______m__~- ~ <S-o 0 I ~~ I o~ , I I ~. od- I . . '1--- ~~ I I t: :.:.:.:.:.:. (S- .:.:.:.:.:.: I 0 ~!:iiiiii:ii I -t.-~ I -- 1 ::::;:::;::: ~ -. :' , 'Q~ ZN3~O:1 IN'I~e . \ IJJ 0:: ~I I C) u f I 0 . ' I 4~ ~~ IJJ I ~ I J --------- I : I C) .... I j I~ _.-~_.- .. .. -- ~ -- o. .- -- U) I <( ''11 A~~iBA IJJ ~ I \. I , .e , ~ ~ .:.- z \ - t: "r:~':! '~ ' P'i') . i i 1': ;r!~' ';:" . I, r ! ~ IJ1 ~" I ~. ~ I f' " f l rn," , i i I . if '-Ii 1"'1 I! I~' Ii! , ~: I I ] , :: ,i .~ '......t. I... <..!' ~' ! , '.' '.'.'''' ,.~. "'1:--" " 1..l....!.'.'l.~,.1 ~'....... J d .' Z c;p, . . tH ,I H ' ~i'ill III 10 4 ~o +.l '.-1 .oJ \.il Ql .0 ~U) ..-1 ;.:l \W .t:4 E-< ,.... -0 ><H'Ql ~ ~ en..oJ res I . I I . \ '1 , ~I ~I ~~, .1~ 'I ..-- ;. /'11,. ~ os.os :'1'" -/oOG> ; 1-;:: I ('_', I "- \.. ... . , I '."" ,,:.. , , , \:J: '~~ ~\ '~~: ':1 '\ ~':~ r'-;.T~ .. J'S-f I ,,~,_ .,. It !. \~~ '. ",. ". ": :..,. JO'~g -- "'''\. ..~ ~ ~.- ~I ~ 'I I I I I ~~c?09.0g- ;6-t? 'f?6.? .', ".<;>, ""...,". . '" '- .~ ~,~.. .,?'- q',.~" ,", C:-S"'//" '&".s;, ""," " ~'- ~ .' -:. ' " ~ ';~ / -, ~ ',,- J ,,~,,' A~~~~" "\. I " ~ '~, - :- EE ,~ ..~~~., ~:;~a I ~ ~ -c:.'. \--"':. C> 1 \j, "" ,,' \ ..... 'J l:, .~ ... \ . ..;. \ 'I\. - . ' \ __ \, __ I \ ~ .) , ~. ."'~ I 'I" 'r. ~ ,,", " r::~ :' (,'.. ...~" ~ ::!t J ~ ; I +- . ~:;E".~,-~ .. ~ €:.vt!. . _ .. .." ,"' ! : _.,:.:...".. '1C"C'o .........,.__ --...........:. \ I ". t. _ ~ I I , ~ ~l : \i ;0 ~ ~\, ~ Il\a \l\ -1 '~, '';1 '\ 11\ - .... . ~. ':''' .. .. ,c' I ~ (~ ':, . ::"4... ~_T ~l" .... ;~.:. o~o~ -... . (;1(;1*'~....., -- ZN3~Ol rl) \ \ \ 't- ~ \~ I '.' .......-, ';(, I r~ .N , . ti..i\'\:"'" .~ 0(\ . -'l' ~ . ~\ ~ 0('\, \. I , ',<. I (J \ . I;}. \ ~\!t~ \, a" \-1. \ :t:\ \j:. ~\ - \ \ \\ : \ : [I ~I ~ . .~. . "'. . '" \ . _ . \r--.. ~ -..' L - ----h:zL .,. 1 57" ~.P - ..-..- ~!'. .. "'- ~~"" '. :::.~ ~ ~,~" . ~,~-~ . ~,,~ ~~ \'l~~ t6,,,> \ \ #.~~. ':'/6 .~/ ..... 0 ~ ~ . '" v'~1 IfiLl "" ~ ;""','" ...H'''~'''i IN'it~9 "'i. . :. .! . . -t '. ~ .~-i.~ -. , -~ ~ ~ . " "=:' . ' , , r-: ~ t:. ,~\ . . I - It ,!f:-. '- " ::4 ~!, - :" .... ...., .... :z ;.:.J ODD. ~ h 8 11. ..I.~.,....;.,.............. 'I , ,i I' ..t" ,~ :'" I', : t' :> :;,~ ". ::p t:;~! ~:~ ~~ ~~ <a'~ ..... ~ ..c:e-o )<H ~tI.l -:4 ~- .... .__.. ...--.- ..~ .....--..... - -'--'--"" . "._..__._-~.~ .. -.....~ .-..----.....-.. ... -----..- _ "'. . .._":_":'...-.::::=-~'--::';':~::_~~="'--:::7:--:.--:-"-:~:-~ .::,:.: .~:.:.. d'..... ..;.;:::...:.:._ _.~.. ":==::~=:::=::-..;-::-=:-'::.-~~=-- --.."-- . .----.., ._--~._._-,_. ~. -- . f ~~ --':i'" -=-~-l , ..... --t' . . _I~ .. ..... ... , ., iINote,,,... ii ~! " J1 : ~'~ :'j i i1 i '. i', ,'II IJ ~l 1....j.~.J.. ~ ii, ;1 ,,':: III I:' ii . ,"",#.-. lief!." l.l ... .]. : ", I [',l...... I ~-:-:.-. ~ .'---.---. .--- - -~--' '----'-".- - _._--~-_....-. .._.~-"._... _. .-.. --..-.._.*._.__. .--'--- .-.-,. -- .._- .:.: --.::-_.. -:'"'_-::.~~--= - -" NoUV^'31'3 J.h;lM '?NU.~1)(3 ._ ,~...'_.._ .. .__._.._.... ~:~~._...~~~~:.M TT8.T:~:~.~t > L" J~AB[ ~=-lig-~:r;ll~.'fl>-~-:~ ~1 'Rlli' ~ I , - :'1 U U u! " '.., j 1- .---!,[ 1.:.., _. _____ ,-_-=~___. 1 -:- -- : - .j -:-,..T" ." =',:~,:., f '--" --- _=:~._-.~'.. ~-:.,,?~.:::-' --:~~- ~ ~- ~~:-~: -,-~ lr--- ~ 0'" ~ 0"" ".~'OG ...~~..~~.., k;~.p; ~"":f , ...*_. . -~- ..... -- ,.-. .._--~-~..- - - - . - ., ... -'., -~-,,_..._, . .....""~. ....-...---.. . - '_"_.__n____..._.._ __._ - -.-.- _....... .-. . .------,--"'-.p - . .~-,---_._.-.. '.~. ..----". -_.'~- ...-- ..- ~ ._- _._....--,.... * .. ....._....-... .- ~.._<_......- ,.. --_..- _. -- - - --..-..... ~ ._.- ._..-__...._.~--..-._.- ----- .-. ---......-..--.. -_...~---_.._--_._. --" _. - -. - ~_........_~ .. -. _. ._-.'._-- - ._*...- '-'-"-"'-' _. ..' - - ._---~ ....._-- -......--- - -- . ,,- _ .._---- -~. ... ..., ~ ~,,-_..._. ,;tNl(i. t-t,,'U"'t;ln )'''1'1 f'llN ..."",\1 U ""J'tif .11"t H"f\rU ,;..~ ..~::"",'J'I"..1 I ~11',11"1 '1 1 J ~" Ii '( , "i J 1:. . ~: t; ! 'II 'l1 ~: ~ i 1" PI Ill' 'jl,! " . :!; I, ,d~" . " !;>jB;:;'~I:'~%~= I 'n -. n .' rr[ JI :- U::.~, ._ 1 ;~;u " 1..~nl"N ~ l"'''/fI .. f~ L~ '\1 ~'ol~"""I;'llf~ ~"'o/J.~~'.l"h'~ ,0.. J. ,;t,f j''tY'JtC. HOlJ."'^-:31--:1 ~I~ '9tll).ltln ~ b1Nt-nJ 1Q<1J.:t111N1.1 'lIl1l'dl(l- - '--t-- . , .. _....~. '~.-...~._. ._ '-"'_ _.~ __.._..... .__,...__...,,_ <".,.._...... ___."_...u., ...I~--" .... .;. ". . c:" Z H Q ...:l H => I:Q c:" .uZ ..... H .Df-' ..... en .t::H ><>< ~~ u ri e tiOU'<f^;J1:3 H.L~ M:3N '-'E--.-..t- ~ .- ----+ . . .."'- -----t--- _ .. 'l~___L' _..L_..~ .. I ..a.... f'" ItO".I~ ."A...,.,..,.,,' ~ .,.~ .- --'~-"i":.d' t "1'-' '!'d.'.d' l!I..--.. i ' - ,,- I .L . ~ p.,r., I , I NOIJ.,V/<3t1 .J..N;r-Aj) ...L.L/.31'1 M3N II I I E1 I, ~j I ~.tt ml'4'~'-bl-:l'!l I I <a.l ,...,,/:t-tlf" "'l'il,J."'!)c'1-41, h.-_....__. Ii - - "Z--. + ,. . l - - b;l[IC\.{1;'I .,4 n= - - J <>.1 "'QIl/ll<~1 '/NI L'-1':1 . -- 1,1 l j : I. ! '; - · , t: = ~ 'I "" ! ""c.,~ Y:J. \ I ~L:-~ " , 1'k".!IM'" M1H"~ .II.,~~ -1101 ..IN'< 111'41k.J'" v. ~l".lV..'1Nr.',l 1\04:(3 ~":':~'~~-:.-'-:.~' .'~- ..',- ':'~.;',':':'; ..,.- ,.,... ....". - ". -. ': -.: -::'~--==~;::- -. -~- . --'..~---_.. ,,".. .'., _.--.. - ,'-' - -....--.- _4_"___. ---"--"'+"~ '.. -,-, ..-.- .--.-- _.._-.. --,-.' ..-.- .....'........---- .-.-.-, ._-_..._..._...._~.- ._~. ~ ,'.. -... .~~ . .: =:~~:::: ,:;::: ::-=':. -:. .- .- ., _ . ::;-.::=- - ,~~~.~~i~~4;-:...::~t.. .E~~;::-;~,~7:~~.~; .~ __ -. ~ :'~:.~=' ,,"-. ,_C ------. '-~:~..:'.'~~"'~:=~'~" ---~ "Itllilrl>l;l Ml1~ oj, ~17'Nj - :i~'h(iH o)N-lilr'''3~. ,..-. .-... HOIUM... l't1N ~. ,L t..~' ,O"'=.+f. ~ t:==:i , : ).:.:1'?1 .. ---:::::=:"=:'~_'d _.__..--,~ <' ., -..tr JJ " - , I 11 I", j .6' ," 1~:1l! , , 1-.1 ~I i I i .:~ ,,.. c Z H o ~ H ::J lXl o o ~~ 'M (J) .DO 'M ll. ..c::O ><p:; ~ll. , ,. . . CITY OF SHOREWOOD MAYOR Robert Rascop COUNCIL Jan Haugen Tad Shaw Kristi Stover Robert Gagne ADMINISTRATOR Qa~iel J. Vogt 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD . ,SHOREWOOD. MINNESOTA 55331 . (61}f474-3236 MEMORANDUM TO: PLANNING COMMISSION, MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: BRAD NIELSEN DATE: 25 MARCH 1986 RE: MELOCHE/BAUMAN - SIMPLE SUBDIVISION, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND VARIANCES FILE NO.: 405 (86.03) BACKGROUND Mr. B. Thomas Bauman and Leo Meloche have requested a simple subdivision/lot combination for their properties lo~ated at 26140 and 26120 Birch Bluff Road, respectively (see Site Location map - Exhibit A, attached). Mr. Meloche's lot is quite narrow (50 feet) while Mr. Bauman apparently has more property than he needs. The purpose of the division/combination is to make the lots more equal in size and to allow Mr. Meloche to improve his property by building a room addition on the west side. Since neither lot meets the zoning requirements of the R-1A district in which they are located, a conditional use permit is required for development (or redevelopment in this case) of the property. The Bauman property is currently 120 feet wide and contains 20,880 square feet in area. The Meloche property is 50 feet wide and contains 8,750 square feet in area. If the division/combination is approved both lots would be 85 feet wide and contain 14,815 square feet in area. While Mr. Bauman is willing to convey approximately 30 feet of his property to Mr. Meloche (see Site Plan - Exhibit B, attached) he is concerned about being able to build a future garage on the east side of his house. His new garage plus Mr. Meloche's room addition and new garage are shown with a 10 foot side yard. Since the Zoning Ordinance requires 20 foot side yards for lakeshore property, they have requested variances to allow a reduced setback. The site plan also shows the location of three accessory structures which currently exist on the properties. The two garages on the south ends of the properties in question are proposed to be removed. The applicants have requested that a small boathouse situated near the lakeshore be allowed to remain despite its not meeting zoning standards. A ResldentiaL Cnmin(lnlty niJ7"Kp. Minniif,inkii't; .<:"Ilth .C:llfi~ 13- . . Mr. Meloche has requested a variance to locate his new garage closer than 50 feet to the street (44'). He cites Section 200.03 Subd. 3d. of the Zoning Ordinance which allows the City to reduce setbacks where structures on adjoining property are closer to the street than current zoning might allow. ISSUES AND ANALYSIS Mr. Meloche has cited several factors justifying approval of the C.U.P. and variances. Most important to him is that the approvals would allow him to improve his property thereby enhancing the neighborhood and improving property values. Other, more objective factors, are as follows: a. The property was platted prior to any form of zoning laws. b. Changes in laws over the years (the most recent of which is the 20 foot side yard requirement) have resulted in older buildings becoming nonconforming. c. The lots were not platted perpendicular to the street or the shoreline. The resulting lot configuration has some affect on the buildable area of the lots. This is true of most of the lots along Birch Bluff Road. d. The character of the area would not be adversely affected as a result of the variances. A case in point is the property immediately east of the Meloche property, where the existing garage is appro~tely three feet from the side lot line and three feet from the street right-of-way. A drive along Birch Bluff Road quickly reveals older development with many garages close to the street. While all of these factors are considered to have merit, there is one issue which may outweight the others. When the Zoning Ordinance was being studied, it was mentioned that the Birch Bluff Road area may be inappropriately zoned. As such it was flagged for further study. Upon review of the lot size analysis which was prepared with the Zoning Ordinance, the median lot size for lots fronting on Birch Bluff Road is 23,522 square feet in area. Out of 56 lots, 36 (64%) are less than 30,000 square feet in area and only seven (13%) meet the requirements of the current R-1A zoning. It is little wonder why substandard lots in that area can not meet the current setback requirements geared toward larger lots. RECOMMENDATION If the property in question was located in an area that was characterized by large lots which conformed to R-1A standards, the suggested recommendation would be to deny the applicants' request. However, given the existing character and the questionable current zoning of the area, the request is considered reasonable. It is worth noting that removal of the two existing garages improve the conformity of the property relative to front setbacks. - 2 - . '.c I In view of the preceding analysis, it is recommended that the applicant's request be granted subject to the following: 1. The applicant must provide new surveys of the two newly configured lots, along with new legal descriptions of the lots. This should be done wrthin 30 days of the Council's approval. 2. The applicants must submit up-to-date tit.le opml.ons (within the--last 30 days) showing their control of the property. This will be subject to~satisfactory review by the City Attorney. 3. The division/combination must be recorded with Hennepin County within 30 days of the applicant's receipt of the Council resolution approving the request. 4. The two southernmost garages must be removed within some reasonable length of time. It is suggested that this be done in conjunction with building permits for Mr. Meloche's addition or within one year from date of Council approval, whichever comes first. The City should give serious consideration to requiring the nonconforming boat house to be removed (or moved back) as well. 5. The property division should be designed so as to leave adequate room for Mr. Bauman's garage plus a 10 foot side setback and a 50 foot front yard setback. The proposed garage is not acceptable in ,its current location - 33 feet from the street r.o.w. It is strongly suggested that in addition to the above, the City consider rezoning the Birch Bluff Road area to R-1C. While this would not accomplish complete conformity it should significantly reduce the need for variances and conditional use permits. It is felt that this could be done iri conjunction with the final adoption of the new Zoning Ordinance. BJN:ph cc: Dan Vogt Glenn Froberg Jim Norton Leo Meloche B. Thomas Bauman '--- - 3 - "'~.."- "' c:~~- L. .....;:a.. ..~_.~.. i~~~~~~~~~'-:~~~~~.4:.- - -- '~..€E'-- ~:~;-<~.~ r-...~-. lL-_ IL__ . "-.4;. .. . .. .-CJ. t Ii -:!~ :1 J ~ c .- s: 1 l1J Z t - CI) -.J l1J Z -.- 'if}t3~n3 <i <t -.J .....J W a:: .....J 0 ~ u 0 0 >- 0 3: z 0 z 0 :J ~ >- en w .....J M31^ MOa'if3~ .....J ~ a: Exhibit A SITE LOCATION Meloche/Bauman - Simple subdivision, C.O.P. and variances w ti C) -.-.....-.. CI) <t l&J l. f /11 ~ CIR. ) ___~ .1' \I ,,'-'\.J . I -- ~~:.C'N4"':;:;;. ,=\:~, -, r::..~ .- ,.' 't. - "',,~. \ ~"" ". ,., .. ,.., "t;)O ' ',~ ~ ~, ~. , ~ ,~~ ~', ,'~ ~{ ~ -, -" \. .II '-i~,., ~ ~ ~' ,1 '" ~ ,~~ ~ ~ '\ ~ ~ \ ~ : ~ ~~~ , \j ll} ) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~... ~ p... <l ~ ~ "'\ \.': ~ ~ O ~ III "" ~ ' ~ ,'~'" ~ ~,~) Q , \>'" ~~ - \...,,~ \l) ~ " ~ ~ ... ~ ~i~ ,.",. . .. '+:~-"'_.' _-, -~~ I . g~:~;--~~..." t __ '. ~~"r', --...------- '( 133CJ1S ... ~ .1:: ~ , o ,. '" '; Q , I (a3^O~drll J.ON) OHlHl It) N ~ ~ ~ )( :t: ~~//////// - ~ " +9LI It (:) &. '" \ "" I . .. ~ .. .d. '\ o\~J 0':).) \',j '1 "... '" ,<:I, ... I.!.... ..,:... \)1 " t '"l ""..1, ~ "111I <:) .... .- ~~, "'C.~~ - ..! J ( c~t ' ,-' I I 0 0 '. ''': 0 . - C"'"'\- .t' , .. C , '! .- --- It) a co ~ 'i, ~ ~ ~ + vLI .... , , " t- o N , (0)('-/' # ..J., . Exhibit B SITE PLAN (SURVEY) ..-....;'.. '-.~. .r- ...., . . - Cl) , .~ . '" "":r. ,U,\ ('.J · ";;;;- ,'-~C"'YO~.~'~~~~~lt:--..::.:;- ... =- _ I~~:-,~.:-'S?;;?"::~~";"\'~,:~EH\~ ~~,\-d~,_ .' . _.__'.' ~~ ~> ,. '-- J. ~". \..1. '-3.. \ -=== a: ~~.. - ~,.I - ~ ...... ~ ~. t9'D~f~-=; ~n:~~~L ~ J '~. ~ ~rrIL~~ ~~~.~?~ ,.. f ~<<-1 ri! ~ .'\ ~"'I I ~ -1-1t- {-d::. sJ E ~ '\\~" l~\\ . ~L s i ~, 1 --\ ;'. -, "710 \\- \..~~ C; ..,~~ ~. ~i? ~ 't?' '" I. - i Y';:"JF=' L: ~ ~ ~ "-., /17 'ti:} -- - .'~,' ~ 1-1 ... 1= ,. 8 j ~~ ~_ . .I i"t <(- ~_. /~ I ~ ~,~ , . i. J/' f:J .r- 'C (' 1 ~ c( -. - J ru~r--- . 'I ~ \ f \ ~~I ~"I ~,,-''k'~,' [l~~.ri,,:..-jt!l a:~. L_, .-,. ..-~, -)/ I:J,-." lX- ~l ~ ~.. · LS" ,~: , Jr----.. - J ,) T . > -1)1\:'" J I. , ., Lf.,.-----I--~ ~ ....A, ,. ,- C.' ill ' ={ ~ ~ ~ ~~~. : ,'=lJ :!'1~-r:l j iI, I ~~.. I :. ~ .'\~. . ,i~~- .-. \ l \ ~ - 4 ~ ~ ~~_ ' In : ~,~,:: I i l=.-=.~ ~ YI "'_ ,1-:: <f. ~ :: ~\~; . - .~ ,,,, or. \ ~~ ~~\ I , ... IF- .......... ...\~ ':;r>-1 ~-~ ~ I'C -~, ~~r:: ~ 111111] 'll~l ' ~~' z l'r l ' ,I I '., ; I,' .- ""\ ._ . ~ ~ . .~ I ~-,.: ,. ! I Pl-, '[ , I t l S:. 1 r '_II~.; ~ ~ I' 0 iH -- -- --'---If:. ~, . ! , I. '~~F 1:.1 -p =}~~ . ,I ,:, i~. - tu ~". '~'. l:z- :_,1 . ' j"" --- · ~ I \ ~r 1 . i, C .' ~-1 .'T . i i ...~ ~ c f-- ; I I ' I -,- I .~ ~ " . ' ~r- f" . 1-. I ~\ ....~,~. <( ~~ l,~'i i- ,"~ '-r:- \, " . . \__H_ .~ a: \~1 ~;~-..~~ , \\ . 10.. I ;---, I- ~ - ; I I ~ I Exhibit C PROPOSED REZONING . . CITY OF SHOREWOOD MAYOR Robert Rascop COUNCI L Jan Haugen Tad Shaw Kristi Stover Robert Gagne ADMINISTRATOR Daniel J. Vogt 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD . SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 . (612) 474-3236 MEMORANDUM TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: BRAD NIELSEN DATE: 10 APRIL 1986 RE: TINGEWOOD P.U.D. - REINSTATEMENT FILE NO.: 405 (86.08) Mr. James Harmsen has been working with Mr. Robert Erickson to resurrect the Tingewood P.U.D. project. They apparently have received the backing of the Bank of Minneapolis and Trust Company to complete the project (see Exhibit A - letter, dated 19 February 1986). I've met with Mssrs. Harmsen and Erickson to discuss what needs to be done in order to reinstate the previous building permit and the P.U.D. status of the project. A. Building permit for existing structure. 1. Sewer and water lines must be tested to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 2. Final inspections of completed units. 3. Final plumbing inspection of completed units. 4. Erosion control measures must be reestablished to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 5. Ponding area in the southwest corner of the site must be cleaned out. 6. The developer must provide a new building permit fee. The State Building code provides for one half of the original fee. B. Reinstate P.U.D. 1. The developer must submit an up-to-date title opinIon showing ownership . and clear title to the property. 2. The developer should provide a detailed explanation of the current status of the project, including how the financial problems have been resolved. A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore /1 . . Re: Tingewood PUD 10 April 1986 3. A new landscape plan, prepared by a professional landscape architect, must be submitted. The landscaping should restore the center island to something closer to the original development plan. Once approved, a letter of credit must be submitted for 150 percent of the estimated cost of the improvement. 4. A new phasing plan must be submitted specifying anticipated starting and completion dates for the remaining units. 5. Estimated cost of completing the project and evidence of financial commit- ment from financier. ' 6. The staff should be directed to prepare a revised development agreement between the City and the new owner of the project. To ensure that City expenses are covered, it is recommended that an escrow of $1,000 be submitted by the developer. In the interest of completing the first three units and achieving occupancy for those units, the developer has requested approval of the building permit necessary to complete the units. Provided the items listed in A. above are resolved, this is considered acceptable. In fact, there are advantages to seeing the units completed (e.g. maintenance of the private street should no longer be a problem). The developer will attend the Council meeting on 14 April to discuss the project and answer any questions you may have. If there are any questions prior to the meeting, please contact my office. BJN:ph cc: Dan Vogt Glenn Froberg Jim Norton James Harmsen - 2 - . . . lJiank of JJlinnrapolis anb ~rust (tCompanp 809 Nicollet Mall. Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 Telephone: (612) 340-5500 February 19, 1986 Dear Honerable Mayor and Council Members: My name is James Harmsen and I am a Minnesota real estate broker and consultant. Mr. Erickson, the Bank of Minneapolis and Trust Company, and I have worked very hard to settle the Christmas Lake issue. Mr. Adrian Johnson is no longer involved in the project and Bob Erickson and I have taken over the project. The Bank of Minneapolis and Trust Company is helping with the financing. Since I am the new person involved in this project, and we are ready to move forward, I ask the City for its cooperation. We need the PUD status reinstated, and a favorable plan to complete development of the site. Your cooperation will help me see this project through. If you have any questions regarding the financial arrangement being provided by the Bank of Minenapolis, you may contact Mr. Worledge at 340-5530. {'S7r~erelY youifr..~, 1 (/~ 4. / 7VVh?/V~ !~ i 1/ \ . ames Harmsen' ~~~~ Executive Vice President rjc ~h;b~lt " ~.~- . . ~. '-" ' ..............'./..... ..,..... ORR.SCHELEN. MAYERON & ASSOCIATES, INC. Consulting Engineers Land Surveyors April 10, 1986 City of Shorewood 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, MN 55331 Attn: Mr. Dan Vogt, City Administrator Re: Trunk Watermain, Bituminous street Surface, Aggregate Base, Subgrade Stabilization and Concrete Curb and Gutter project No. 86-2 Feasibility Report Comm. No. 1744.20 Dear Dan: Attached is a copy of the Feasibility Report for City Project 86-2. We will be happy to discuss this with you at your convenience. Sincerely, ORR-SCHELEN-MAYERON AND ASSOCIATES, INC d::::. ~tl~ City Engineer JPN:llr enclosure 2021 East Hennepin Avenue. Suite 238 . Minneapolis, Minnesota 55413 · 612/331- 8660 l.5/3 .,,,,:- . -.~ - . . FEASIBILITY REPORT TRUNK WATERMAIN BITUMINOUS STREET SURFACE, AGGREGATE BASE, SUBGRADE STABILIZATION CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER, AND APPURTENANT WORK PROJECT NO. 86-2 CITY OF SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA April 10, 1986 I. TYPE OF WORK This work consists of the construction of approximately 6400 L.F. of 6 inch through 16 inch trunk watermain, 5600 L.F. of bituminous street surface and aggregate base and subgrade stabilization, including right turn lane off S. T. H. 7, and 10,700 L. F. of concrete curb and gutter and appurtenant work. II. LOCATION The proposed project area is in the western portion of the Ci ty of Shorewood in Sections 31 and 32 of Township l17N, Range 23W which will serve the plat of Shorewood Oaks. III. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT The proposed facility locations are shown on the attached Sheet "A" and are outlined below. Included in this project is the construction of approximately 6400 L.F. of 6 inch through 16 inch watermain from a western beginning at the existing 12 inch stub at Boulder Bridge Drive and Smithtown Road to an eastern terminus at the intersection of Strawberry Lane and propsed Shorewood Oaks Drive along the following described alignment. Smithtown Road - Boulder Bridge Drive to Cajed Road (2920') Cajed Road - Smithtown Road to Beverly Drive (860') Beverly Drive - Cajed Road to Cathcart'Drive (920') Carthcart Drive Beverly Drive to proposed Strawberry Circle (230') Strawberry Circle - Cathcart Drive to Hennepin Co. RR. Property (770') Maple Avenue - Hennepin Co. RR. Authority to Strawberry Lane (610' ) Strawberry Lane - Maple Avenue to Proposed Shorewood Oaks Drive (90') . . Other work included in this report is the following items: 1. 30' back to back bituminous street surface 2. Design D-412 concrete curb and gutter 3. 6 inch Class 5 aggregate base 4. 15 inch average depth sand backfill subgrade subcut including filter fabric referred to as subgrade stabilization 5. Restoration Within the proposed Shorewood Oaks following proposed named streets: Shorewood Oaks Drive (2256') Oak Leaf Trail (2007') Davids Court (602') Daniels Circle (278') Developement I on the Also included in this turn lane on S.T.H. consisting of a 300 turn lane transition standards. project is the construction of a right 7 at proposed Shorewood Oaks Drive, L.F. deceleration lane, plus 180 L.F. taper, all in accordance wi th Mn/DOT IV. FEASIBILITY From an engineering standpoint, this project is feasible and can be accomplished as proposed and does not have to be done in conjunction with another project. V.. ESTIMATED COST The estimated project cost of the facilities are as outlined below. Restoration (Shorewood Oaks plat) $210,000 $129,000 $ 50,000 $ 52,000 $160,000 $ 13,000 $614,000 Watermain (Inc. Restoration) Bituminous Street Surface D-4l2 Concrete Curb and Gutter Aggregate Base Subgrade Correction Total Construction Cost Total Project Cost * $858,000 * Note: project costs include 10% contingances and 27% indirect costs. . . VI. PROPERTY TO BE ASSESSED The total cost of the project shall be assessed against the Shorewood Oaks Plat. VII. ESTIMATED ASSESSMENTS $858,000 = $11,753.43/Lot * ~ 73 Lots * Note: The estimated assessment may vary, as only the total number lots unsold at the time of the project completion shall be assessed that cost of the project. I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. ch:e~.1~ Date: April 10, 1986 Reg. No. 11606 I I I ','--- I -~f/ I i I : ((k i ~:':a<<A! ~~:J. ~n ,~I \~_,~ I'''> I /.fi1J >Ui~~~ I \\"'~!'~"~&i" ~~~--~\.. ----~,~'~: Tff1J, ~ w I ~.,.~~ ./j / r~I"-~ ~~ ."-~I.---- . ~IT ill"'. ~~~:r~~~~~~~1!~1 :.:' u 1 . .. ....' / ~ I 1/ : II /1 \ .... : . ~ I~",,~.... ill f"-= '-'" . - -+- --..-- .. -._, -f1 _ _ w... _ .~ __ I L 1/ · L >-. I lf1Ul~=:=,lJ~I~ _~ ;:..... .*. "7 I ~ I "~l~-JObj , kw~~:~- ~~_. .~.1\~.~~~~.m"lrp;{n ~/~:Y ~I ~__+_LI': !. ~ /. ~ ,.- t::J) f---::I ! Il i I 1t-//1 \" \ \ ll-' :.. ~ =-::: , I -;1. n i 'T I~ IJ' :.~-- 1-..+.1 II \ r- 'r dlV. >>/~, ur.-.. ~. '-', I + / I b.~ ~ I'~ I ~J . ..... \ ~\~;:..- ::;; j ~.:.:.:.:. t> L- I---- ~ I 1--- '--n-- ~]~ /~'-I...~ ~ I ;'-- ~~# ~'~,. , =P / -:j-1 ~ll :y r :: @)" ~,', ,;" d t=f I.~-' ~T~ - ~ I~ I III -T.'~/ ,', ?i.if\* *\f~ ~ / I '/ ~)--" 011 I /'./ ,~.... ..... ~,..'\'...1 ~, ..- I '(~ - ] /.1'h- .::, ':':':'. "::' :'::. :i~ /' ~ . .. -- .~') - I ~.:: ': ~ ~:~ ':~.:::::.':;(:;';!~.~~~'~ .:.;'~.;;.:::'~~ /' -'l ::;;.;['" . , ill--1 :: .....'..... ....:......... . ..... ..... J: . - 1/= r-f'T" ....:....... E8f.:.:.:....~f}':t-;p.. ~[L' - .. '" '. --i- ~ I IT ';:4/':' ....:....:.:~:..::...:..:..::..:::~:.. .::: _-- ~ l~ . J.' "',J..w.: . .:.,;...... :,:.:...:.:<;......f..::~{::....h ....:.:-- -- ~i --- I~-~. VCTOO~ y~ ..+=~~~n. - : "\I:-~ : /1 ! ~ ..~~ y" ,~~ } tJ~ ' ,. f . SCALE 1-'1200' LEGEND :::.;~i(~{::}:~:::2~.~: ASS E SS MEN TAR E A ......... TRUNK WATERMAIN STREET CONSTRUCTION AND APPURTENANT WORK if 01... I,: """"^ MSM ' l T. >, ORR.SCHELEN.MAYERON Get.: ~ :I-::~~~:~~~:'~: UIII ...... .1..IAPOLlI, .I..UO'A ~"IJ . I''') llllMO ~ / 1 0/8 \,)\,,/\.) el""1OII .. .... co.IULTA'''' . laIC . ! Or..I". Tltl. PROPOSED FACILITY LOCA TIONS CITY PROJECT 86-2 c.... No. 1744.20 /" " Shllt No. A . . . CITY OF SHOREWOOD MA YOR Robert Rascop COUNCI L Jan Haugen Tad Shaw Kristi Stover Robert Gagne ADMINISTRATOR Doug Uhrhammer 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD · SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 . (612) 474-3236 MEMO TO: Mayor and Councilmembers FROM: Dan Vogt ~ DATE: Apri 1 10, 1986 SUBJECT: Police Department Since the special meeting held last Monday night, I have done some investigating as to alternatives of aiding the City in planning for the start of a Police Department. Two alternatives seem to exist: Hire a chief, or, hire a consultant. Either way, some strategy for advertising should be developed. It is my feeling that a consultant could be hired locally with knowledge of Minnesota laws for setting up the department. A chief may not need to be hired locally and advertising could be done nationally in an international police chief's magazine. In either case, a set of criteria for hiring should be used. To hire a chief, the City should set certain requirements, such as prior chief experience and good organizational and management skills to establish the department. The City should also state that it is a new departme~t which needs to be established from the ground up. I would recommend that this approach be the City's second choice. Similar to how the Liquor Store situation was handled, I recommend that the City hire a consultant to guide us through the planning pro- cess. I have then8me of a person who may be able to help who lives and is employed here in the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area. To date, I have not been able to make contact with this individual. I under- stand that he will be back in his office prior to your meeting on Monday night. Upon my contact with him, I will discuss our situation with him and try to get an idea as to what services he can provide, length of time his study will take arid- cost. - I will also discuss with him if he would hire a chief or a consultant, if he had a similar situ- ation. If this person cannot serve our needs, perhaps he will know someone who can. I will update you at the meeting. A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore /7/1 . . - 2 - To advertise for a police chief in the League of Minnesota Cities Magazine in May, an ad must be in on Tuesday (April 15). If the City chooses to hire a chief, this would give me Tuesday to write an ad. I don't see this as a problem. Other media sources would be the Minneapolis Star and Tribune and the Minnesota POST Board. Ads can be called in on short notice. The City would not need to advertise to hire a consultant I would merely request a proposal from qualified persons or firms. Hopefully, the information contained herein will assist you in the dis- cussion on Monday night. MIC'IIAML ROUILLARD, Pres. Corcoraa 471-6976 GERMAIN BOLL, Vice Presi. Maple Plaia 446-1067 . - JUSTINE GOULD. Treasurer Maple Grove 420-4057 Hennepin County Agricultural Society Sporuor of the A"PIUal COt,"ty Fair EILEEN ROEHLKE, Secretary - Rogen, Minnesota 55374 23185 Co. Rd. 10 Tel. (612) 498-8502 DIRECTORS: CATHY CAIN Corcoran 420-2927 ",,"'rch 14. 1986 TO: Hennepin City Clerks FROM: Eileen Roehlke, Secretary SUBJECT: New Hennepin County NOlde Tyme" F&ir r , FLORENCE LARSON Plymouth 546-2945 I want to give you a preview of Hennepin County'. 1 ~ exciting new "Olde Tyme" Fair. Thi. year we are IIIOving the Fair to a new location and expanding the activities. We are asking for your .upport in two areas: l)a donation and 2)your .upport in g.tting the word out about the new Fair. JIM MILOW Corcoran 420-2270 ANDY ROZEBOOM Maple Grove 559-2989 The new Hennepin County NOlde Tyme" Fair will resemble an old-fashioned county fair with a rural ..tting in the city of Corcoran (.ee enclo.ed map). Feature. of the new Fair include carnival ride., grandstand .hows, cotton candy, fruit and vegetable exhibits, needlework exhibits.footlong hotdog., 4-H exhibit. and animal. and lot. more. With this move and expanison of activities we hope to again e.tabli.h the Hennepin County Fair a. first-rate. JUDY NICHOLS Minnetonka 935-4216 In order to achieve our goals we need the cooperation of all the Hennepin County citie.. I I E.F. ROBB, JR. County Commissioner 1. We are suggesting a small donation ba8ed on your population a8 follow.: 100-2500 resident8--$25.00 2500-10,000 re8ident.--$50.00 10,000-25,000 re.idents--$100.00 $25,000-50,000 re.ident.--$280.88 Over 50,000 resident.--$300.00 2. We al.o reque.t your ~ooperation.in getting the ~~rd out to lOUC cit!.:8 ~~ro~;h e~~y ~~4~~~tt.r'. poster., newspaper., utility billing., .tc. I am enclo.ing a relea.e that I would urge you to u.. in your city'. new.letter. A repre.entative from the Fair Board will be contacting you within thr.e weeks to det.rmine your new. letter schedule and .upply you with additional information you may need as well a. poster. and flyer.. Thank you v.ry much for your cooperation and .upport. With your h.lp w. can mak. the new H.~n.pin County . "Old. Ty.." Fair a hug. .ucc.... FLOYD NELSON Dayton 420-4536 MEMBERS OF ADVISORY BOARD PHILIP WEBER Administrative Service Manager Bureau of Public Service ...- . TAD JUDE Senator 48th District ~ I -. - JEAN LOW Co-Extension Agent, 4-H SHIRLEY BONINE District Park Commissioner' Maple Plain BOth ANNUAL HENNEPIN COUNTY FAIR AT CORCORAN . .~ Corcoran Lions Park . State Hwy. 101 and Co. Rd. 10 July~, 26, and '1:1,1986 /.7 t5 . .".. MEMO TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: . . CITY OF SHOREWOOD MAYOR Robert Raseop COUNCI L Jan Haugen Tad Shaw Kristi Stover Robert Gagne ADMINISTRATOR Daniel J. Vogt 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD . SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 . (612) 474-3236 MAYOR AND COUNCILMEMBERS DAN VOGT J9f APRIL 10, 1986 PUBLIC WORKS UNION As you are aware, the position of Assistant Public Works Director was ordered by a Mediator to be included as a job within the AFSCME unit. Therefore, the job classification of Assistant Public Works Director will be incorporated into Appendix A of the Agreement along with the salary already established. Because of this ruling, Howard Stark will be placed back to the position of Light Equip- ment Operator/Laborer at the established rate of pay for this position. Dues deduction for Howard will resume. As to filling the new position, the current Agreement states that: "All job openings shall be posted for ten (10) calendar days. Among qualified applicants, as determined by the employer, selection shall be by seniority." The union wants the City to post the posit- ion per the Agreement for filling at this time. Since the City has the authority to assign work, I would recommend that the position not be posted and filled immediately as the Union would like. I would like to instruct Don to assign work which will give us an indication as to who is the most qualified to fill the position. We may then decide to fill the position later in the year. Call me if you have any questions relative to this issue prior to the meeting on the 14th. A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore /ld/ CITY OF SHOREWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING TUESDAY, APRIL 1, 1986 COUNCIL CHAMBERS 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD 7:30 P.M. r [ M I NUT E S CALL TO ORDER Chair Leslie called the meeting to order at 7:36 P.M. ROLL CALL Present: Chair Leslie; Commissioners Watten, Reese, -Spellman, Benson, Mason; Council Liaison Stover; Planner Nielsen; Planning Asst. Helgesen. Absent: Commissioner Schultz (excused). APPROVAL OF MINUTES Reese moved, seconded by Benson to approve the minutes of February 18, 1986 as written. Motion carried unanimously. 7:30 PUBLIC HEARING - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND SETBACK VARIANCE Baylon Leiferman - 5775 Grant Lorenz Road Public portion of the hearing opened at 7:38 P.M. Mr. Leifetman was present to explain his request for a building permit in order to remove his existing garage and replace it with a room addition. He also proposes to build a new detached garage at the rear of the existing house. Since the house does not comply with the R-1A setbacks, any expansion or structural alteration requires a CUP. In addition, since he would like to add a small room onto the northwest corner which would increase the nonconformity, he is requesting a setback variance. Public portion of the hearing closed at 7:41 P.M. without comment. Planner Nielsen noted that Section 200.03 Subd. 3d of the Zoning Ordinance provides for a reduced setback where adjoining property structures are closer to the street than zoning requirements might otherwise allow. Therefore it would be considered consistent with the Zoning Ordinance to approve the variance. Watten moved, seconded by Spellman to recommend to Council approval of the conditional use permit a~d setback variance. Motion carried unanimously. SIMPLE SUBDIVISION .Warren Olson - 5600 Grant Lorenz Road Mr. Olson explained that he owns approximately two acres within the Oak Ridge Estates subdivision (5600 Grant Lorenz Road) which he proposes to divide into two lots. Both lots would meet the requirements of the R-1A zoning district in which they are located. Planner Nielsen commented that since a detailed report of this request is not available to the Planning Commission he wanted to report that soil tests were done because of the wetness of the proposed easterly lot and these tests show what corrections are needed; the addresses of the lots would be off of Noble Road; a survey is needed showing where Mr. Olson's house is located to assure that it meets proper setbacks; and that a park dedication fee will need to be paid on the newly created lot prior to the Council releasing a Resolution. Minutes Planning Commission Meeting Tuesday, April 1, 1986 page two Simple Subdivision - Warren Olson, continued: Reese moved_, seeonded by Watten to recommend to Council approval of the simple subdivision subject to submittal of the survey and the park dedicati~n fee on the new lot. Motion._carried unanimously. 8:00 PUBLICHEAkING - SIMPLE SUBDIVISION AND LOT AREA VARIANCE Wallace King - 25620 Birch Bluff Road Public portion of the public hearing opened at 8:00 P.M. Mr. Gerald Carroll, attorney, representing Mr. Wallace King pointed out how the paved traveled surface of Birch Bluff Road strays out of its right-of-way, which physically separates the northeast corner of the lot to the south of Mr. King's property and appears to adjoin it to Mr. King's lot. For this reason Mr. King wishes to divide it from its existing lot to the south and have it combined with his own lot. Since the southerly lot is already substandard in size (9,656 square feet, not including the street surface), and the proposed division reduced it further, Mr. King is requesting a lot area variance as well. Planner Nielsen said that the staff recommendation is that the City require that the property containing the paved roadway, plus 10 feet along its south side, be dedicated to the City. In turn, any portion of the existing r.o.w. in excess of 50 feet be vacated and conveyed to Mr. King. This would require surveying to prepare legal descriptions of the new r.o.w. and for the portion of the old r.o.w. to be vacated. As stated in the Planner's report, since the recommendation of the staff benefits both the applicant and the City, the City may wish to split the costs with Mr. King. Mr. Carroll said that the Kings' are agreeable to sharing the cost of the survey. Public portion of the hearing closed at 8:07 P.M. Commissioner Reese said he felt it should be to the Council's descretion as to whether the City should share the cost for the survey. Commissioner Watten asked what advantage there would be to the owners of the south lot. Planner Nielsen responded that although the total lot area would be reduced, the lot would-no'longer be split by the road surface. "' Mark Harland, 5300 Eureka Road wondered if this street vacation would affect the fire lane. Planner Nielsen said no, the fire lane is simply an extension of Eureka Road. John Russell, whose grandparents own nearby property, said he recalls previous owners of the south lot having had many problems with the fact that a portion of the lot was separated by the surface of the roadway. They felt they should have been able to park there, etc. Benson moved, seconded by Reese to recommend to Council approval of the simple subdivision, lot area variance, and vacation of the right-of-way, subject to the staff recommendations including the recommendations in the Planners report requiring the applicant to provide an up-to-date title opinion for the southerly property prior to finalizing the, subdivision/street vacation process. Motion carried unanimously. - 2 - Minutes Planning Commission Meeting Tuesday, April 1, 1986 page three 8:15 PUBLIC HEARING - SIMPLE SUBDIVISION, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND VARIANCES Meloche/Bauman - 26120/26i40 Birch Bluff Road Public portion of the public hearing opened at 8:20 P.M. Mr. Leo Meloche of 26120 Birch Bluff Road explained that he would like to purchase approximately 35 feet of land from his neighbor, Mr. Thomas Bauman of 26140 Birch Bluff Road. Mr. Meloche said this would allow him to build a garage on his property and also have the option of adding onto or remodeling his house in the future. Mr. Bauman is willing to convey the approximate 35 feet of his property to Mr. Meloche, but is concerned about being able to build a future garage on the east side of his house. His new garage plus Mr. Meloche's room addition and new garage will allow for a 10 foot side yard, however, the Zoning Ordinance requires 20 foot side yards for 1akeshore property, therefore the applicant's have requested variances to allow a reduced setback. The sites contain a total of three existing accessory structures, two garages on the south ends of the properties, and a small boathouse near the 1akeshore. Mr. Meloche said he is willing to remove the westerly garage immediately, but would not want to remove the easterly garage within one year as recommended in the Planner's report. , Public portion of the hearing closed at 8:29 P.M. It wasc1arliied that the applicants need a simple subdivision in order to relocate the lot line, a conditional use permit to develop substandard lots, and a variance for reduced side yard setbacks. Mr. Meloche said he does not want to be held to the one year limitation of the conditional use permit and he was told that the zoning ordinance does provide for extensions of same. Spellman moved, seconded by Watten to recommend to Council approval of the simple subdivision, conditional use permit, and setback variances, all of which pertain to both the Meloche and Bauman lots, and subject to the Planner's recommendations as listed below. Planner Nielsen suggested that Mr. Meloche be required to remove the westerly" garage within one year from the date of Council approval, and remove the easterly garage when a building permit is issued. Spellman amended his motion to reflect this. Motion carried unanimously. 1. The applicant must provide new surveys of the two newly configured lots, along with new legal descriptions of the lots. This should be done within 30 days of the Council's approval. 2. The applicants must submit up-to-date title opinions (within the last 30 days) showing their control of the property. This will be subject to satisfactory review by the City Attorney. 3. The division/combination must be recorded with Hennepin County within 30 days of the applicant's receipt of the Council resolution approving the request. - 3 - Minutes Planning Commission Meeting Tuesday, April 1, 1986 page four Recommendations, continued: 4. The two southernmost garages must be removed within some reasonable length of time. It is suggested that the westerly garage be removed within one year from the date of Council approval, and the easterly garage be removed when a building permit is issued. The City should give serious consideration to requiring the nonconforming boat house to be removed (or moved back) as well. 5. The property division should be designed so as to leave adequate room for Mr. Bauman's garage plus a 10 foot side setback and a 50 foot front yard setback. The proposed garage is not acceptable in its current location - 33 feet from the street r.o.w. The Commission also gave consideration to the issue of rezoning the Birch Bluff area to R-1C. Reese moved, reconded by Spellman to delay any decision on the rezoning issue until the Study Session meeting. Motion carried unanimously. 8:30 PUBLIC HEARING - SIMPLE SUBDIVISION, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND VARIANCES Christmas Lake Association/DNR - Merry Lane Public portion of the public hearing opened at 8:46 P.M. Planner Nielsen reviewed for the Commission a summarization of the current requests. As detailed in his letter to Frank Fallon, dated February 19, 1986, Planner Nielsen explained that a subdivision will be necessary to divide Interstudy B from Interstudy A and then legally combine B with Interstudy C. Also, the Fayfield parcel must be combined with Interstudy A. A conditional use permit is required for the development of a substandard lot. Finally, several variances are needed for lot area, lot depth, setbacks, etc. Scott Bracke, Landscape Architect for the DNR presented a drawing of the plans for the access site which included landscape, bituminous road surface and parking facilities. Public portion of the public hearing closed at 8:53 P.M. without comment. Comm. Spellman questioned who would be responsible for maintenance, and if it were owned by the, DNR, wouldn't they maintain it? Council Liaison Stover said that it was her ynderstanding that the City would maintain it to its own standards regardless of who oWned it. If the access was opposed by the City, the DNR would acquire the site and develop it without any voice by the City. Mr. Fallon said that agreements have provided that the taxpayers will pay for maintenance costs, and the DNR will pay for the capital costs. Annual estimated costs to the City include about $200 for insurance, and $6,000 - $8,000 for maintenance. Comm. Spellman said that he doesn't feel that the 2 inch bituminous surface of the road and parking area, as proposed by the DNR, is sufficient. Mr. Bracke responded that the DNR feels it is. Margaret Hottinger of Interstudy asked if they may have the optkm of keeping the substandard buildings on the Fayfield property. Planner Nielsen said that he feels strongly that these buildings be removed, although the time limit is open to discussion. Ms. Hottinger said the buildings are rental homes and they will need some time to notify the tenants. Planner Nielsen said he would not recommend allowing the buildings to remain for longer than one year. - 4 - Minutes Planning Commission Meeting Tuesday, April 1, 1986 page five Christmas Lake Access, continued: The Commission discussed the Planner's end City Engineer's recommendatiOns as listed in their reports, on an itemized basis. The Planner's recommendations, as amended, are as follows: 1. Substandard buildings on the Fayfield property should be removed before January 1, 1987. 2. The Fayfield property should be legally combined with the Interstudy site. 3. The small parcel to be conveyed to Paul Ellwood must be legally combined with his property north of the access site. 4. The applicants must submit up-to-date title opinions, new surveys and new legal descriptions of the reconfigured parcels. 5. Other types of ground cover should be considered for the center islands and easterly borders of the parking area. 6. The City should require the access road to be constructed in compliance with the recommendation of the City Engineer. The City Engineer's recommendations are as follows: 1. Traffic signs should be installed to identify the site and to route traffic flow on the site. A public lake access sign should be installed at the intersection of the S.T.H. 7 service road and the lake access road. 2. On site traffic should be signed to maximize boat launching movements and queing. 3. The typical street section of a 2" bituminous surface over 6" of Class 5 aggregate base is less than the Mn/DOT recommended street cross-section minimum. Mn/DOT recommends a bituminous surface granular equivalency of 7. The 2" bituminous surface yields a granular equivalence of 4 to 4.5. 4. As prftsently shown on the plans, side slope construction extends beyond the 30 foot wide easement in conjunction with construction of the access road. 5. Sod should be placed to the edge of the 2 foot aggregate shoulder where no curb exists rather than to the edge of the bituminous mat. 6. Due to the traffic loads which will be imposed on the shallow corrugated metal pipe culverts, exceptional pipe bedding installation procedures should be specified, or consideration given to the installation of a reinforced concrete pipe culvert to resist crushing. 7. A trash rack should be installed at the upstream end of Culver No.1, along with aprons on the other ends of the culverts. 8. Flow lines could be shown on the bituminous parking lot plan sheet to help the contractor during construction. - 5 - Minutes Planning Commission Meeting Tuesday, April 1, 1986 page six Christmas Lake Access, continued: Watten moved, seconded by Benson to recommend to Council approval of the simple subdivision, conditional use permit, and variances, subject to the City Planner and City Engineer recommendations as listed 'above. Motion carried by Roll Call Vote 5 ayes, 1 nay (Spellman). -. - ..~ . 9:00 PUBLIC HEARING - PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLAT Harding Acres Second Addition - Wedgewood Drive Public portion of the public hearing opened at 9:55 P.M. Planner Nielsen reminded the Commission that last year the City approved an 18-lot preliminary plat for Harding acres. Final plat approval was given for six of the lots and they are now requesting approval of the 12-lot second phase. The drawings are consistent with the previous request and meet all zoning requirements. Darwin Meyers, Wedgewood Drive asked about the drainage plans. Planner Nielsen pointed out that the developer is installing a pipe to drain runoff to a holding pond which would release it to a natural drainage flow to the wetlands to the north. Chuck Amlaw, Smithtown Road, wanted to know that all the lots will meet the 20,000 sq. ft. ~inimum, and also if there is planned to be a cul-de-sac from the south. Planner Nielsen responded that yes, all lots will be at least 20,000 sq. feet, and a cul-de-sac from the south is not planned. Public portion of the hearing closed at 10:06 P.M. Spellman moved, seconded by Benson to recommend to Council approval of the preliminary and final plat subject to the provisions of the Subdivision Ordinance. Motion carried unanimously. 9:15 PUBLIC HEARING - SETBACK VARIANCE David Haskins - 5472 Carrie Lane Public portion of the public hearing opened at 10:07 P.M. , Mr. Haskins was present to request a setback variance to the road as well as the south border of his property. He explained that he had designed a house according to the preliminary plat which showed a 30 foot setback all around the lot. Planner Nielsen said that the final plat, as signed by Robert S.C. Peterson, contained a 35 foot setback on the east and a 50 foot setback on the south. Mr. Haskins said that alter- native designs for the house would result in having to remove additional trees from the lot and would also upset the drainage pattern. Richard Gay, 5480 covington Road, said he was denied a 10 foot variance which he was requesting for similar reasons about one year ago. He said that if Mr. Haskin's request is approved he would like to see a condition placed which would prohibit removal of any vegetation from the lot. Walt Jones, 5520 Covington Road, is also concerned about preservation of trees and aesthetic character of the lot. He said he is pleased with Mr. Haskin's site design as proposed and has no objection to the request. - 6 - Minutes Planning Commission Meeting Tuesday, April 1, 1986 page seven Setback Variance -David Haskins, continued: Scott R. deLambert, owner of Lot 1 submitted ~ letter stating approval of the request. Public portion of the public hearing closed a~ 10:34 P.M. Spellman moved, seconded by Benson to recommend to Council denial of the setback variance. Comm. Benson said that he supports the recommendation for denial because it is apparent that Mr. Peterson misrepresented the lot at the sale, and he feels that a house could be adequately designed within the current setbacks. Motion carried by Roll Call Vote - 6 ayes. L MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR Chair Leslie read aloud a letter received from the Heritage Residence applicants which requests an additional extension of time beyond the original 60-day delay which was approved at the February 4, 1986 Planning Commission in order to continue to assess the water service situation. Reese moved, seconded by Spellman to approve an additional 60-day extention. Comm. Benson said he would like to see a Market Feasibility Study submitted prior to this additional 60-day extension. Reese amended his motion to reflect this requirement. Motion carried unanimously. Mr. Ste~e Bruce, representing Allen K. Larson of 6050 Ridge Road presented for comment a proposal for a C.U.P. to allow construction of a detached garage. This would be the fourth accessory building on the lot as well as exceeding the 1,000 sq. ft. maximum accessory space allowed. The Commission indicated that they would not likely recommend approval of this proposal as it would be setting precedence. REPORTS Council Liaison Stover reminded the Commission of the Corridor Study meeting to be held on Wednesday, April 2, 1986 at Minnetonka High School. ADJOURNMENT The next meeting of the Planning Commission is scheduled for Tuesday, April 15, 1986 at 7:30 P.M: Commissioner Schultz has already notified staff that he will be out of town on ,that date. Spellman moved, seconded by Leslie to adjourn the meeting at 10:57 P.M. Motion carried unanimously. Respectfully submitted, Patricia Helgesen Planning Assistant - 7 - . FEASIBILITY REPORT STREET REPLACEMENT, STORM SEWER AND APPURTENANT WORK PROJECT NO. 85..1 CITY OF SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA ,. MARCH 18, 1986 I. TYPE OF WORK This work cons;sts of the replacement of the existing street surface with a new bituminous pavement surface, and a rolled bituminous curb or concrete curb and gutter, whichever is selected. Also included in this project is the construction of approximately 4,300 feet of 12 inch through 42 inch storm sewer and appurte- nant work as shown on Sheet A. II . LOCATION The proposed project area is in the western portion of the City of Shorewood in Sections 31, 32 and 33 of Township 117N, Range 23 West, and includes property in the following described plats (also see attached map on Sheet A): Afton Meadows, Blocks 1, 2, 3, and 4 Lots 1, 2, 3 & 4 Minnewashta Acres Lot 10, Auditor Subdivision No. 247 & Wild Duck Second Addition III. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT Streets to be replaced with either 30 or 24 foot face to face bituminous streets are as follows: Afton Road from Cathcart Drive to Smithtown Road, Beverly Drive from Cathcart Drive to Cul-de-sac, Cajed Road from Beverly Drive to Smithtown Road, Cathcart Drive from W. 62nd Street to Smithtown Road, and Wedgewood Drive from Mallard Lane east to cul-de-sac. Included in this project is the construction of 1,000 lineal feet of storm sewer in Cajed Road from Beverly Drive to a Lake Minnetonka wetland outlet, and 3,300 lineal feet of storm sewer in Cathcart Drive from W. 62nd Street to a Lake Minnetonka wetland outlet. IV. FEASIBILITY From an engineering standpoint, this project is feasible and can be accomplished as proposed and does not have to be done in conjunction with another project. V. ESTIMATED COST The estimated project cost of the facilities are as outlined on the following pages. 033-3643 Page 1 , J These costs include sub-cutting the street 21 deep in case of bad material in the subgrade. (A subcutting cost of $342.000 is included in the project cost above.) These costs DO NOT include any costs for sub-cutting the street in case of bad material in the subgrade. Prior to final design of the streets. soil borings must be taken to verify if any subcutting may be necessary. Minimum recommended street section. load carrying capability not numerically defined. approximates 4 ton design. A. STREET CONSTRUCTION (Does not Include Stonn Sewer) ALTERNATIVES Cathcart Drive. Cajed Road. Afton Road & Beverly Drive Concrete Curb & Gutter 301 F-F (9 Tons) Rolled Bituminous Curb 301 F-F (9 Tons) Concrete Curb & Gutter 241 F-F (9 Tons) Rolled Bituminous Curb 241 F-F (9 Tons) Concrete Curb & Gutter 241 F-F (7 Tons) Rolled Bituminous Curb 241 F-F (7 Tons) Concrete Curb & Gutter 241 F-F (4 Tons)*** Rolled Bituminous Curb 241 F-F (4 Tons)*** Wedgewood Drive Rolled Bituminous Curb 301 F-F (9 Tons) Including Sub-Drain System Rolled Bituminous Curb 301 F-F (7 Tons) Including Sub-Drain System Rolled Bituminous Curb 301 F-F (4 Tons)*** Including Sub-Drain System * ** *** , Project Costs $813.600.00* $761.000.00* $426.900.00** $358.000.00** $378.300.00** $309.400.00** $352.900.00** $284.000.00** $117.000.00 $109.000.00 $107.000.00 NOTE: Project costs include 10% contingency and 27% indirect costs. and no ease- ment costs are included in the above. B. Storm Sewer Construction Easements. Cajed Road. Cathcart Drive. Afton Road and Beverly Drive Project Costs $300.000.00 NOTE: Project costs include 10% contingency and 27% indirect costs. 033-3643 Page 2 VI. PROPERTY TO BE ASSESSED The properties to be assessed are those properties which abut the following streets: lOCATION Cathcart Drive Afton Road Cajed Lane Beverly Dri ve Wedgewood Drive FROM West 62nd Street Smithtown Road Smithtown Road Cul-de-Sac Mallard Lane TERMINUS Smithtown Road Cathcart Drive Beverly Dri ve Cathcart Dri ve East to Cul-de-Sac And located in the following section: The East 300 feet of the South 1/2, Section 31, Township 117, Range 23, lying southerly of Smithtown Road Also located in the following plats and sections: - Westlawn II (Two) - Afton Meadows, Blocks I, 2, 3, & 4 - Minnewashta Acres, Lots I, 2, 3 & 4 - Lots 1 & 2, Minnewashta _ Auditors Sub-Division No. 247, Lot 10 & all that part of the SW1/4 of Sec- tion 32, T 117, R 23, except R.L.S. No. 1064, Lot 10 Auditors Subdivision No. 247 and the plats of Afton Meadows, Minnewashta & Minnewashta Acres Also all that part of the following plat: Wild Duck Second Addition lying within Section 33, T 117, R 23 VII. ESTIMATED ASSESSMENTS A. Street Assessment (Does not include Storm Sewer or Wedgewood Drive) ESTIMATED FRONT FOOT ASSESSMENTS I \ CONCRETE CURB IROLLED BITUMINOUS\ & GUTTER I CURB I I I 301 241 301 241 \ I 9 Tons I 99.85* 52.39 93.40* I 43.94 I I I I I 7 Tons ------ 46.43 I ------ I 37.97 4 Tons I ------ 43.31 I ------ I 34.86 *Costs include sub-cutting the street 21 deep in the case of bad material. 033-3643 Page 3 B. Storm Sewer Assessment (Does not include street assessment or Wedgewood Dr.) Estimated Storm Sewer Project Costs $300,000.00 The area east of Cathcart Drive will require additional storm sewer facilities when development occurs. As a result, they derive only a partial benefit from ~his pr~ject. That partial benefit and partial assessmen~ is as follows: "'- Area _East of Cathcart Drive (Partial Assessment) l,103.ZQO Sq. Ft. @ $0.035/Sq. Ft. --59,612.00 $240,388.00 The storm sewer to be i nsta 11 ed east of Cathcart Dri ve when development occurs will cost approximately $100,000. An additional $.06 per sq. ft. assessment east of Cathcart Drive will cover the $100,000 cost (1986 dollars). The area west of Cathcart Drive derives full benefit from this project. The esti- mated assessment is as follows: Area west of Cathcart Dri ve(Full Assessment) $240,388 + 2,542,632 Sq. Ft. = $0.095/Sq. Ft. Typical Lot Assessment Lot 6, Block 2, Afton Meadows $ 3,828.79 $11,163.39 . /1 (fl,r vr ~D ~~tD' ~'1 ?K1-: ~t4~ <61dl a. Street Constructi on '72-.-;).- Concrete Curb & Gutter 24' F-F (9 Tons) 140' @ ~t. = $ 7,334.60 b. Storm Sewer Construction 40,303 Sq. Ft. @ 0.095/Sq. Ft. ESTIMATED ASSESSMENT Wedgewood Drive Only PROJECT COSTS $117,000.00 $109,000.00 $107,000.00 Street Construction Including Sub-Drain ( Street Construction Including Sub-Drain ( Street Construction Including Sub-Drain ( 9 Tons ) 7 Tons ) 4 Tons ) I hereby certify that thi s plan, speci fi cat i on or report was prepared by me or under my di rect supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Ml nnesotaj,,~, p Y1c:Ei;:J ( / James P. N1rion Date: March 18, 1986 Reg. No. 11606 033-3643 Page 4 STREET REPlACDENT PRWECT 85-1 (SlREET CON5TROCTI~ 00. Y) CITY (f SKRElOD Ml'RCH 18, 1986 9~ 7~ 4~ OON:RE1E C & G IOl.ED BIT. am 00ttRETE C & G IU..IB) BIT. Clm OOtC.RE1E C & G IU..lB) BIT. elm 00tC.RE1E C & G 1U..l.ED BIT. ClRB ~ FT. F-F 30 FT. F-F 24' FT. F-F 24 FT. F-F 24 FT. F-F 24 FT. F-F 24 FT. F-F 24 FT. F-F CAlltART mIVE $341,400* $319,400* $201,500** $171,~ $179,100** $150,tm** $167 ,100** $1~,tm** rAJED R(W) $129,(0)* $120,(0)* $ 62,700** $ 51,500** $ 57,500** $ 44,8Xl** . $ 54,(0)** $ 41,Dl** ~ R(W) $156,100* $148,&D* $ 76,700** $ 65,8Xl** $ 68,200** $ 57,700** $ 63,700** $ 53,200** BEVERLY tRIVE $187,100* $173,(0)* $ 86,(0)** $ 68,8Xl** $ 73,500** $ 56,Dl** $ 68,100** $ SO,m**' roTAL PRWECT cmT $813,600* $761,(XX)* $426,~ $358,000** $378,D)l'* $309 ,4(X)Wr $352, g)()Ir* $284,000** * These costs include sub-cutting the street 2 deep 1n case of I2f material in the subgrade. ** These costs 00 NJT include any costs for sutKutting the street 1n case of I2f material 1n the subgrade. r<<JTE: ttJ eaSSII!f1t costs are 1nch.ded in the above. ~ ,. \ " 033-3643 Page 5 STORM SEWER PROJECT 85-1 CITY OF SHOREWOOD MARCH 18, 1986 AFTON ROAD $ 1,400* BEVERLY DRIVE $ 1,200* CAJED ROAD $ 66,400* CATHCART DRIVE $ 231,000* TOTAL STORM SEWER PROJECT COST $ 300,000* STORM SEWER ASSESSABLE AREA (Full Assessment) 2,542,632 Sq. Ft. (Pa rt i a 1 Assessment) 1,703.200 Sq. Ft. * Project cost includes: 10% contingency, 27% indirect costs, but no easement costs. 033-3643 Page 6 .. 1/ -- ~~-- I I I j I I LAKE MINNETONKA (lJ1'FER LME I ! .J . ________-1 r I , l 1 I =J " VICTOOIA '-------- ............................. STORM SEWER t............................ ............................. ............................. ASSESSABLE AREA Dr_": "''''''' , " " 'ORR.8CHELEN.MAYERON M.S. M. &A88OCIATE8.INC. I ....' rch 18, 1986 --- ... --- \..A.A,J "" IAI1 .....". A"I . lUll. III ...UPOUI. .'''''11A ,..u . .'U) II.'" .,,,........... -.uMTI." STREET REPLACEMENT, STORM SEWER AND APPURTENANT WORK PROJECT NO. 85-1 SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA c_.... 033-3843 .... Me. A !' " April 9, 1986 Attention: Shorewood City Council cc: Dan Vogt Brad Nielsen We the neighborhood of Beverl y Drive and Cajed Lane would like to see a dead-end at Cajed Lane and Beverly Drive. This would greatly reduce through traffic, thereby cutting down on wear and tear on the road. We do riot feel this will create a safety hazard as much as it would a safety feature. Cajed Lane Dead-End ~ Address 1. tp~~ ;:~ f!- tt..1:ctcL-S. 5' :'~ b 2. { YrU'4/ /:' j~~ 1/ rtJf.j ~'"U~ foOlS CGljeJ L{). ~ tOo~~-~ ~~ 5 ,wv 'f:::. .Ilr/!::;'p ~ 6 'J.)J" S/t/.{ if {y ~/l.. 6. ~~ l? .(. b 'i U- 84 ZJ". 7. 12Ae.''''_ ~ ~.Jo %0 e ~ J2... 8. ~ L-O~ ~&;Cj~O ~ OtC. 9. ~/l(.~ ""HJb~ 0... 10. r ~ ~ .;2~ f1d~ ~~. ~. 11. 7(~ L ~ .;u 910 ~~. /,\ __ ~ .26~O 13~1y 'oh( . 12. 'V... - . n , 13. cJfetde ciJ~ cJ 6 cP3cJ VSeuen;1 ~ 14. V.C..~...1(~ ,^(p~r5 ~ 15. I(~ ~ 16. J~. J~ Cever-J'd I-c: :1., JJ3-u (3€.Y0rfy Dr " . \ / ( '-.;'L/_L c:e, ".-; /) , // // /) J \ j Name Address M4,~ _ -'I/J "") ---< ~ 17. 'I/? . LCf: ~'{, i FC> ClEVe";../, L ,LJe~ 18. 11// OG"J>.;s- (3 ~ .0-<' , 19. . C0 0<.7/7.&7 8~ ~ 2O.1ku:u~ rn;75 ~~. 21. ~ ,k .Q7/7> ~~.k :::~!ft~ LZ;;:fo ~~' 24.~'Il~O'f:o ~ 25.~~ ~~ (Qt)/5---@t2pn~/~ 26. C<. )~ ()..,701'O> ~~~~. Z1.4 /~~ 1--7075' I?~ D-, 28. /~ C-~ (f.()'1~ ~ h 29. r?f~~ ~-;l7o aev~ A......iv-e........ 30. I~!JJ.~ 6C(f!)O ~ ~ 3J. ~~ (J~ ,jfJO{) ~ toad 3~. ~.~ ~ 61/5 IlJr1711- ~ 33. ~ ~ 6'1/5' -_r.-=- .34. 7r Y71 -:h~iP. ~ n "3). ./V~(Jj~ ~(pgrei) htc. 3t,. f ..wrdL Pull;, ~707S- 1lt. . .'7 vvv-""'O /7t1/pO 4 /l... .f \ /"'1., _, ''''''''':_' "/' / r ," . //c () "Je' / April 9, 1986 Attention: Shorewood City Council cc: Dan Vogt Brad Nielsen ~frJ,-rDN 1?d~ We the neighborhood of Beverly Drive and Cajed LaneAare not interested in the City of Shorewood's proposed plan for street replacement and storm sewer, Project 185-1, wh1ch would add nothing at this point but more taxes and assessment. We want to keep it rural. Project #85-1 Name Address t; /}' V' i. /7~ r ~;; ;?~;- (i~LI-e~ d'" ;;::, , 1. {/ ,X't:L~ ,;T\.k~.u-u.IC..{/\-- :J '7 2. \. ~ cfr!~ /; // L/ 3. ~ COOlS ~Q.j'e6 Ln ' 5. ~A-'~-~ j/7p1~/J1:t/;{~~ 6. ~,I.M.<Ik.- ~ Ii- ZJ, 'l2..-s tt?4 v..(. . 1. ~ 1!1 ~(o't<a.O 12~ ()/t 8. ~ 1-. D~ ;lto 9Ct;O ~ {Jtt. 9. ~~ 71f a.".,..At, 02. r:. 13 0 ~ Ik. 10~ ~~d ;2._"00 ~.L" a ~~~, 11. '7!:'u ;;:. ~ ;J. 6, '''''' ~ ~. 12~ .VCl.-.. ~. 2..6 8J 0 /5Jlv..-1y t1n, 1i:~J.1<:x:ffe (Q66>~O 03eu!11~ DY 14.-V,c... ~~ ~G,gr5 r3~~J\, IS. 1(~ ~ // 16. J~ ~ J, Co yerJ-o/<. d. 0':30 11 eyer-Iy fir , --'.I: . Name Address ~~ d0J75 6}:7/c7e7 ,OR. 2&" J' 7 S- ~u-Ir tJA? . ~//7o g~ ~~. ~7/75 ~ Atv. d7,?-) fS~~ l-1;~ ~<Ylff/r!k reo L60 ~~ ' 24 25.~~ ~~ {PO/j./ e~:ue. 1-~ 26. C2 /~ <J..70tS e~ ~ 27. ~ ~6J----1 2-7"'7.1 1?~ ~~ ' 28. /~ c.-~ 4.-0'15" ~ '1-v... J . 29. tJ~,e ~ 2-7//0 .3ev~ ~ 30. /~ ;1~ 5r;oo ~ lOad 31, f(~;7~ 5900 dfCCvn ROM 31- ~ ~~ $"'730 H-4J /?j 31 (~/fn~ 5130 /Ur~ f!J. ( rv<-"'i.7 ~ ..sfd5~~ .'3:) c7' ~. sysr ~ IP . "_ . Jb :?!I~ c:;r",~ (fcr1# ~/lJJ ~~.- 71- ~~ $7r6 ~- 111 _ 5170 Rd/ 7f.7Df---" " 14 40. 1L(hI~ ~jlh ci0Jteu 6v~ 1/0<