The URL can be used to link to this page

062386 CC Reg AgP .. c . CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MONDAY, JUNE 23, 1986 COUNClL, CB",.AMBERS 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD 7:30 PM AGE N D A CALL TO ORDER , A. Pledge of Allegiance B. Roll Call Stover Gagne Rascop Haugen Shaw Mayor 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES + =z::: ,,;;r0 =z= 1. v A. Board of Review - May 22, 1986 (refer to June 9 packet) B. Board of Review - June 9, 1986 (Att #lB-minutes) C. Regular council Minutes - June 9, 1986 (Att #lC-minutes) 2. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR A. B. 3. PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT A. B. 4. PARK COMMISSION REPORT A. B. 5. DISCUSSION OF WEDGEWOQD ROAD REPAIR 6. SIGN PERMIT REQUEST - COVINGTON-VINE RIDGE P.U.D. (Att #6A-Planner's report) -1- COUNCIL AGENDA MONDAY, JUNE 23, 1986 page two 7. ATTORNEY'S REPORT A. 2nd'Reading of Alarm System Ordinance (Att #7A-a new draft) B. 2nd Reading of Harbor Limits Ordinance (Refer to packet June 9) C. 1st Reading - Garbage Ordinance (At t #7C-Draft Ord. and memo) D. Findings of Fact - Shafer Variance Request Denial (Att #7D-Resolution) 8. ENGINEER'S REPORT A. Status Report on Shorewood Oaks and SE Area Water Project b6-1 and b6-2 B. Discussion of Bonding for Project 86-1 and 86-2 C. Plans and Specifications - Deep Well SE Area Water D. 9. PLANNER'S REPORT A. Tingewood - Status Update B. Christmas Lake Access -- "N.o Parking". Signs D. Request for Sewer Extension - 5795 Covington Road (Att #9D - letter of request) -2- COUNCIL AGENDA MONDAY, JUNE 23, 1986 page three 10." ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT A. Discussion of 1986 Budget Procedures (Att #lOA-memo) B. Request for Funding - MDIF - Consultant Att #lOB-memo) C. Estimate of of Improvements - Beverly and Cajed Drive D. Corridor Study Status Report E. Status Report on Employee Relationship Policy F. 11. MAYOR'S REPORT A. B. 12. COUNCIL REPORTS A. City Logo Lapel Pin (Att #12 - informational memo) B. 13. APPROVAL OF CLAIMS 14. ADJOURNMENT -3- CITY OF SHOlmWOOD -e I BOARD OF REVIEW-RECONVENE MONDAY, JUNE 9,-1986 ~" . COUNC.HAMBERS 5755 ~NTRY CLUB ROAD 5:00 PM MINUTES CALL TO ORDER The Shorewood City Council reconvened as the Shorewood Board of Review at 5:08 PM on ~~nday, June 9, 1986, in the Council Chambers to review the assessed placed on real estate property in Shorewooq. ROLL CALL Present: Mayor Rascop, Councilmembers Shaw, Stover, Gagne and Haugen (Haugen arrived at 5:13 PM) Staff: Administrator Vogt and Clerk Kennelly Assessors: Hennepin County Assessor Kermit Benson, City Assessors Rolf Erickson, Rita Gunderian and Dave Wilde REQUESTS Minnetonka Country Club 24575 Smithtown Road 33-117-23-31-0004 Mr. Kermit Benson gave the Council information on the cost of installations of newer courses. Mr. Witrak indicated that Minnetrista rejected the increase of I valuation on their golfs along with Eden Prairie and Plymouth. Rascop referred to the Attorney's opinion on the "open space" law and felt the assessors were not following that interpretation in placing the "highest use" value on courses. . Rascop moved, Gagne seconded, to reject the increase valuation and return the valuation to $705,000 as in 1985. Motion carried- 5 ayes. Burger King 19425 State Highway 7 25-117-23-41-0040 A letter was received from Attorney Amy D. Grady representing Burger King. The letter was a notification of their intent to appeal their valuation. Haugen moved, secbnded by Gagne, to accept the letter of appeal. Motion carried-5 ayes. - _ ADJOURNMENT Gagne moved, seconded by Haugen, to adjourn the Board of Review of May 22 and the reconvenence of June 9~ 1986 at 5:17 PM. Motion carried unanimouslY-5 ayes. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED Sandra Kennelly, City Clerk Mayor Robert Rascop / .~ CITY OF REGULAR MONDAY, SHOREWOODe COUNCIL MEETING JUNE 9, 1986 C~IL CHAMBERS 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD 7:30 PM M I NUT E S CALL TO ORDER The regular meeting of the Shorewood City Council was called to order at 7:30 PM, Monday, June 9, 1986, in the Council Chambers. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE AND PRAYER Mayor Rascop opened the Council meeting with the Pledge of Allegiance and a prayer. ROLL CALL Present: Mayor Rascop, Councilmembers Shaw, Stover, Gagne and Haugen. Staff: Attorn~y Froberg, Engineer Norton, Planner Nielsen, Administrator Vogt and Clerk Kennelly APPROVAL OF MINUTES Haugen moved, seconded by Stover, to approve the minutes of the regular Council meeting of May 12, 1986 as corrected. Motion carried - 5 ayes. Gagne moved, seconded by Haugen, to approve the minutes of the regular Council meeting of May 19, 1986 as corrected. Moxion carried - 5 ayes. The Board of Review convened on May 22, 1986. They will continue that meeting until June 9, 1986. Both sets of minutes for the Board of Review will be approved at the June 23rd meeting. PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT Stover will report on the Planning Commission recommendations as each item is dealt with by the Council. PARK COMMISSION REPORT Commissioner Martey Jakel reported the projects discussed at the last meeting. They would like to install a tennis court backboard for individual practice, at an estimated cost of $ 600. for material and labor. The Administrator will obtain plans for the backboa~d. They are also discuss~ng the installation of a volleyball court-. and warming house for" Manor Park. The Council recommended installing signs at the park prohibiting golfing, enforcement would be advisory only. No Re~olution will be passed to prohibit golfing at this time. -1- IL CITY COUNCIL MEE1IIb MONDAY, JUNE 9, 1~6 page two . PARK COMMISSION REPORT - continued The Commission has requested to present a plaque to Mary Kooi for her services on the Park Commission even though a full term of 3 years will not quite be completed. Shaw moved, seconded by Gagne, to make an exception of the "full term'! policy and award a plaque to Mary Kooi because of the great deal of time and services given by her on the Park Commission. Motion carried - 5 ayes. CONSENT AGENDA Council approved the payment of approximately $350 for Shorewood's portion of the striping costs of Minnetonka Boulevard. Council approved the extension of an electricial service at the Christmas Lake access for a future security light. Gagne moved, seconded by Stover, to approve the Consent Agenda requests. Motion carried - 5 ayes. APPROVAL OF THE 1986 LIQUOR LICENSES AND NON-INTOXICATING SALES RESOLUTION NO. 58-86 Applications for renewal were received from: Minnetonka Country Club American Legion Tom Thumb Superette Skipperette On Sale Liquor & Sunday Sales Club & Sunday Sales , Off Sale Non-intoxicating Malt Sales Off Sale Non-intoxicating Malt Sales Gagne moved, seconded by Haugen, to approve the above listed Licenses for June 1986 through May 1987. Licenses approved by Roll Call Vote - 5 ayes. 7:45 PUBLIC HEARING RESOLUTION NO. 59-86 Vacation of a portion of Birch Bluff Road A public hearing was opened at 7:45 PM to hear a request to vacate a portion of the platted road near the intersection of Birch Bluff Road and Eureka, and acquire the area of land where the traveled surface is located. Planner Nielsen explained a request from Wallace King for a subdivision and combination to add a triangle of property cut off by the current traveled surface of the road. Comments wererecelved from Gale Olson Jr. asking for a clarification of the request. He stated that he felt the road should be moved to the platted surface; and Evelyn Olson suggested that trees and shrubs should be cut back for increased visibility of the inter- section. -2- ~ CITY COUNCIL MEE1IIP MONDAY, JUNE 9, 1~6 page three . PUBLIC HEARING - continued Vacation of a Portion of Birch Bluff Road Mayor Rascop closed the public hearing at 7:53 PM after calling for and receiving no further public comment. Haugen moved, seconded by Gagne, to approve the road vacation as described by legal description. Vacation approved by Roll Call vote - 5 ayes. SHOREWOOD INVESTMENT BUILDING FIRE STATUS REPORT Planner Nielsen reported that the burned out structure at 5580 County Road 19 has finally been torn down. The well needs to be filled in, and the sewer connection capped. Mayor Rascop asked Fire Marshall Mark Kuhnly, and Firefighter Glenn Johnston, why it took so long to complete the investigation on the fire. Kuhnly stated that the insurance company caused some delay, and the flooding of the basement and freezing prohibited completion of a thonoughinvestigation until it thawed and was pumped out. Gagne felt that the building was a hazard to life because at no time during the many months that the building stood, was it properly boarded up to prevent entrance. Kuhnly encouraged the Council to come to him immediately with, these types of concerns. VARIANCE OF DENIAL - DONALD SHAFER A request was received from Donald Shafer for a variance to install a dock on an outlot where no residential structure exists, nor can one be built there. Stover indicated that the Planning Commission did approve a dock installation to be used only by the property and if the property is divided no additional docks should be allowed. The dockage to be tied to the property at 23880 Smithtown Road only. Council discussed of the Ordinance. lations on a lone paragraph 2, page possible policy setting against the provisions Stover commented on possible trespassing vio- dock. Shaw directed Nielsen to research further 2. Gagne moved, ~econded by Shaw, to deny the variance req~est and to direct the. Attorney to prepare a Finding of Facts. Motion carried 5 ayes. ~3~ CITY COUNCIL MEE~ ~ MONDAY, JUNE 9, i~6 page four SIMPLE SUBDIVISION AND LOT WIDTH VARIANCE RESOLUTION NO. 60-86 David Kelly - 255l0-~~llowstone Trail David Kelly was present to request a simple subdivision into 2 lots. The residue lot requires a variance for a lot width, proposed at a 50' width. This is intended to be future access for the rear acreage. Gagne moved, seconded by Haugen, to approve the simple subdivision and lot width variance as recommended by the Planning Commission and subject to the 7 Planner's recommendations stated in his 5/1/86 report. Division approved bY~i.oll Call Vote - 5 ayes. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Todd Ladwig - 59~5 Afton Road RESOLUTION NO. 61-86 Mr. Ladwig was present to request permission to add a 22' x 24' deck onto an existing structure. A Conditional Use Permit is necessary because the existing .dwelling does not meet the setback requirements of the R1-A zone. The deck does not increase the nonconformity. Haugen moved, seconded by Stover, to grant a Conditional Use Permit to expand a nonconforming structure as recommended by the Planning Commission and subject to the 5 conditions recommended by the 6/2/86 Planner's report. Conditional Use Permit approved by Roll Call Vote - 5 ayes. SETBACK VARIANCE Robert Bergstrand - 27100 Edgewood Road RESOLUTION NO. 62-86 Robert Bergstrand was present to request a variance to construct a new garage 10 feet from the side property lines. He will be removing an existing garage that is set two feet from the property line. Haugen moved, seconded by Stover, to grant the variance due to the hardship of the lot configuration and the necessity of the garage due to the climate. Variance granted by Roll Call Vote 5 ayes. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT SETBACK VARIANCE James Schultz - 5465 Timber Lane RESOLUTION NO. 63-86 James Schultz has requested a C.U.P. and setback variance to add a deck on to a nonconforming structure. Haugen moved, seconded by Gagne, to grant a CUP as recommended by the Planning Commission. CUP granted by Roll Call Vote - 5 ayes. -4- . CITY COUNCIL MINUT~ MONDAY, JUNE 9, 1986 page five . SIMPLE SUBDIVISION AND LOT AREA VARIANCE RESOLUTION NO. 64-86 Jay Carpenter representing Hwy. 7 Properties, Inc. Lots at 20550-52 and 20560-62 Excelsior Blvd. Mr. Carpenter requests division of his lots. Two family dwellings currently exist on these lots. He is requesting a zero lot line division. A lot area variance is needed due to an unequal division of square footage. Planner Nielsen has recommended a metes and bounds description to enable equal rear yard footage. These legals will be submitted by the applicant. Haugen moved, seconded by Gagne, to approve the division by metes and bounds description subject to the Planner's 3 recommendations dated May 29, 1986, and subject to the Attorney's review and approval of the homeowners agreement. Motion accepted by Roll Call Vote 5 ayes. PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL W.L.C. Acres - 23645 Yellowstone Trail RESOLUTION NO. 65-86 Mr. Richard Larsen of Wirtenen-Clark-Larsen Architects has requested approval of a preliminary plat of 7 lots and a cul-de-sac, meeting all the requirements of the Rl-C zoning. The property is presently owned by Mr. Joe Haney. Comments from the public regarding the division were received from the following: Herb Gager-23640 Yellowstone Trail submitted a petition signed by 2b residents requesting a delay of action to reconsider the zoning of this area to 1 acre lots. He and Mr. Duane Scherbing also questioned the effect 6 new wells would make on the area water table. Roger Lubke and Jim Hamstra had concerns of added traffic, and asked .if the traffic could flow in a different direction. Mel Johnson was concerned about possible drainage problems. Bob Savage indicated that the proposed new road would make his lot a corner lot, and questioned future effects of that on new assessments. Jack Edwards spoke of possibly 20 new lots if the surrounding lots would develop, and the need to improve roads and install street lights. These improvements would be an added expense to the existing property owners. -5- < CITY COUNCIL MINU~ MONDAY, JUNE 9, ~6 page six . '11:' PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL OF W.L.C. ACRES continued Bob Reutiman spoke in favor of the division. He did not feel there would be any drainage or traffic problems. He felt that it should be approved due to the fact that the request does comply with all city Ordinances. Attorney Frank Kelly, representing Joe Haney, referred to the staff report recommending approval of the project. He also stated that the request contained no variances or special requests of any kind. Mr. Larson did feel the acre lots would not be saleable and felt the existing zoning was researched and was correct in that area. He requested approval of the preliminary plat due to the compliance with the zoning ordinance. Joe Haney was not comfortable with the neighbors opposition, but felt that Mr. Larson was a good developer and he had the right to develop within the restrictions of the Ordinance. Rascop asked the Attorney what action should the Council take regarding the petition requesting rezoning to larger acre lots. Froberg felt that the petition should be considered, but it could be very difficult rezoning when an application has been made that complies with the current zoning. A Comp Plan Amendment would also have to be done. Shaw moved, seconded by Gagne, to approve as recommended by the Planning Commission Planner's recommendations dated 5/27/86. Roll Call Vote - 5 ayes. the preliminary plqt and subject to the Approval accepted by Council indicated that the area neighbors could petition for zoning of larger lots for that area, Staff and the Planning Commission will take it under consideration. Mr. Larson thanked the Council and assured them that he was very willing to work with the neighbors. PROPERTY ACQUISITION OF 5795 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD The City received a letter from AttorneyL.H. May Jr. representing the residents of Echo Hills. Attorney Froberg reviewed the letter and did not agree with Attorney May's opinion that the City does not have the right to use this building in the R-IC zone for governmental use. They requested that the City rescind their agreement to purchase. -6- CITY COUNCIL MIrJa . MONDAY, J1JNE 9, 1986 page seven PROPERrY ACQUISITION OF 5795 COUNTRY ClllB ROAD continued Questions and cormnents came from Peter Fazai, Joarme Carroll, Bill Wrede and others asking for proposed use of this facility, what improvements or changes were needed prior to use and long range plan for govern- mental facilities. Rascop indicated that a public hearing would be held prior to deter- mining the exact uses of the new building. Joarme Carroll asked if estimates had been done on converting the City Hall basement into office space, prior to considering the purchase of this house. Council explained the problems with the wet basement, accessibility, needs for the handicapped, additional upstairs remodeling for stairs, bathroom facilities, etc. Bill Wrede asked the city to obtain bids to add on to the existing office building. Rascop explained that there was not adequate space available to add on to the outside of this building. Also, the structure was not originally built to allow a second story. . Haugen suggested, and was supported by the Council, to instruct the administration to obtain bids on improving the basement; adding on to the existing building and a bid for improvements to the new building. Additional confinnation will be needed to determine plans to give to bidders. He will try to obtain these bids by July 28th. A'ITORNEY I S REPORT 1st Reading - Alarm System Ordinance Amendment Attorney Froberg reviewed the Ordinance and would like to further clarify and area of the Ordinance with Chief Young. Haugen moved, 2nd by Gagne, to direct Froberg and Young to review and return to Council for a 2nd reading. Motion carried 5 ayes. Harbor Limits Ordinance - 1st Reading Council reviewed the Ordinance amending Ordinance 12. Haugen moved, 2nd by Gagne, to accept the 1st reading of the Harbor Limits Ordinance. Motion carried 5 ayes. ENGINEER IS REPORl' Discussion of Bids Proposals Project 86-1 and 86-2 Engineer Norton submitted the tabulai ton sheet for bids received on May 30, 1986. These projects were for watennains, street, curb and. -7- CI~ C~UNCIL MImtt MONDAY, JUNE 9, 1986 page eight . Discussion of Bids Proposals Project ~l and ~2 continued . gutter for the Shorewood Oaks Project and the extension from \iaterford to Covington Vine Ridge. Norton didn I t recommend acceptance of the bids at this time due to the insecurity of the Shorewood Oak project. He explained that Dave Johnson, developer of the project, is in the hospital due to a kidney transplant and subsequent rejection. Financial backing and his buyer have just backed out of the project. Gagne asked if we would award the bid on just the Southeast area improvement. The bids were drawn up separately, and the low bidder does not have to accept the bid because it was bid as one job. Award Schedule A of Bid RESOLUTION NO. 67-86 Rascop moved, 2nd by Haugen, to offer Schedule A only to laTour donstruction in the amount of $96,715.30. Motion carried by Roll Call. Vote - 5 ayes. Council questioned the staff expenses already incurred by Shorewood Oaks, if the project is dropped. The developer will be billed those expenses. They proceeded to discuss methods of securing up front monies at the beginning of project applications. Rascop moved, 2nd by Haugen, to institute a policy to require 20% of project cost as a deposit on developments. Planner Nielson suggested further study be~ore passing this policy. _ I ~",," ,/l" , }, " ~~~ ~~, 6 Rascop withdrew his motiop ,qpproved by Haugen. Plan Approval and Authorizaiton for Bids - Street Project RESOLUTION NO. 68-86 Engineer Norton recorrrnended drawing plans for street improvements for Smi thtown Road only, the improvements to Vine Hill Road will be done jointly with the City of Minnetonka uder their bid. All the necessary easements for Eureka Road drainage 1st improvement project have not been obtained. Gagne would like the Wedgewood Road improvements discussed prior to drawing up plans. Norton referred to the minutes of 9/9/85 stating that Dutcher offered to do the road improvements at his cost. Gagne stated that Dutcher will up front the cost of improvements to Wedgewood Road now, if the city will allocate the money for pay-back next year. Rascop and Vogt will set up an appointment with Dutcher to discuss this matter. Haugen moved, 2nd by Rascop, to authorize the preparation of plans and advertising for bids. Motion carried by Roll Call Vote - 5 ayes. -8- CITY COUNCIL MI~ r-DNDAY, JUNE 9, 1986 page nine . PlANNER'S REPORI' ~e~odPOOSt~us~~rt Planner Nielsen indicated that minor progress has been made, and that the landscaping will be reviewed at the next meeting. He would like to review the status of the twelve conditions at the next Council Meeting. Froberg informed the Council that he had been retained by Mrs. Parbara Nielsen. She is involved in a suit with the ~ewood owners. AJlv1INISTRATOR' S REPORI' Corridor StuQy Status Report Administrator Vogt will attend a meeting on Thursday, June 12, to review goals and objectives submitted by the other cities. Shore~od IS stuQy was not originally considered by now has been included. . Haugen understood the stuQy to encompass Highway 101 West to Highway 41, but fells the Vine Hill intersection has received all the attention. Road RePair Problem - Beverly Dr. and Cajed lane A complaint was received on the dust caused by the Class 5 temporary filling of the road. Gagne requested an estimate for a 3" overlay, and to direct the area to be watered down to control dust. MAYOR'S REPORI' Police Contract Draft /~ Letters have been received accepting the 5 year - 1 vote contract. J V U,~ ea::v~~tra~t l~l be drawn fO~~~~::o~:~~e ~~~,~h ~~~t~~t Haugen stated that she took exception to the comments by Excelsior . Councilmember Ryerson rEgarding Shorewood Resolution regarding the withdrawal from the Police department as a "ploy". Zoning Clarification A letter_regarding clarification on the zoning of the Paul Anderson property at 5740 Christmas lake Road was reviewed from their real estate- agent. Nielsen will send clarification. ll1CD -_ A task force will be preparing a comprehensive plan for lake Minnetonka by January. Metro Council has a program to borrow $15,000 to obtain a planner for the process. The request for funds rIRlst come from the City, not the ll1CD. This fund will be interest free, amount to be levied to I>88 back loan. -9- CITY C~UNCIL MImi r-DNDAY, JUNE 9, 1986 page ten . . ~D continued Haugen moved, 2nd by Gagne, to instruct the Attorney to draw up on agreement between the city and the IMCD regarding the loan request. COUNCIL REPORrS Gagne asked that staff start the.procedure to clean up the property at 5580 County Road 19. Finance Corni ttee will meet on Thursday, June 19th. Stover and Rascop will be attending. Stover has presented her Police Districting proposal to two City Councils to date. Haugen will be attending the League of Minnesota Cities conference, and would like Vogt to attend the Small Cities ray. APPROVAL OF ClAIMS AND ADJOURNMENT Haugen moved, 2nd by Gagne, to adjourn the June 9, 1986 City Council Meeting at 11:47 P.M. subject to approval of claims. Motion carried 5 ayes. General Fund - Acct. # 00166-02 Regular Checks #32094-32149 Payroll Checks #200335-200348 $347,898.34 6,818.42 354,716.76 Liquor Fund - Acct. # 00174-02 Regular Checks #4669-4710 Payroll Checks #00349-00362 = $ 49,600.27 2,563.10 52,163.37 RESPECTFULLY SUBMITl'ED Sandra L. Kennelly City Clerk Mayor Rasc~p SI1Gsn -10- CHECK NO 32094 32095 32096 32097 32098 32099 32100 32101 32102 32103 32104 32105 32106 32107 32108 32109 32110 32111 32112 32113 32114 32115 32116 32117 32118 32119 32120 32121 32122 32123 32124 32125 32126 32127 32128 32129 32130 32131 32132 32133 32134 32135 32136 32137 32138 . . GENERAL FUND - BILLS PAID SINCE JUNE 4, 1986 TO WHOM PAID PURPOSE AMOUNT Rolf E.A. Erickson Charles S. Davis Kathleen G. Schwankl Goverpment Finance Officers Assn. Public Employees Retirement Assn. State Treasurer.~ Soc. Sec~ity The Minnetonka Bank Commissioner of Revenue ICMA Retirement Corp. City-Country Credit Union AFSCME LOCAL #224 Child Support Enforcement Unit Robert Mason Homes, Inc. Brenda Beer A & B Sporting Goods Co. Void Assn. of Metropolitan Municipal. Memb. of Metro. Municipal. Astleford Intnat'l Inc. AT&T Communications Brown Photo Associated ASphalt, Inc. Chapin Publishing Co. Chaska Parts Service D.R. Copier Service, Inc. Electronic Door-Lift, Inc. Froberg & Penberthy, P.A. Hance Hardware, Inc. Hennepin County Treasurer Itasca Equipment Co. Kraemer's Home Center H.H. Larson Elec. Co. The League of Minn. Cities Leef Bros, Inc. Louisville Landfill, Inc. Midwest Asphalt Corp. Metro West Inspections Minnegasco Munitech, Inc. Navarre Hardware NSP Perry's Truck Repair Judy Quaas Reynolds Welding Supply Co. Satellite Industries, Inc. May, 1986 Assessing Fee $ 80 hrs regular 80 hrs regular Book - Investing Public Funds 06/07/86 payroll - PERA " " FICA II " FWH " " SWH " " ICMA " " Credit Union " " Union Dues Income Withholding Order Refund of building permit fee Reimb. of Norway Maple Tree Tennis net Void Padelford Cruise - Council Membership Dues 6/1-12/31/86 Muffler Clamp Telephone Service - City Hall Assessor Supplies - Film Hot mix - Patching Roads Murfin Property Tie Rod End Overhead Proj. Transp. Repair Overhead Door - Garage Legal Fees - May 1986 Hooks, Chain - Crescent Beach Room & Board - Prisoners - Ap.'86 Repairs to Mobil Sweeper Lawn Mower & Bagger Amesbury Well Timer Bldg Fund, 1986 Share Laundry Service - Public Works Spring clean-up Repair Shoulder on Star Lane Bldg Inspections - April '86 Utilities Maintenance - June '86 Tarp Straps/Valve City Hall, etc. Used Steering Gear Cleaning City Hall Welding Gas Satellites - 1 - 1,566.66 387.39 483.49 27.50 .1,093.78 1,895.84 1,533.20 687.44 263.00 32.00 68.70 281.00 227.38 11.50 113.00 0.0 15.00 590.00 15.30 4.13 27.00 3,322.86 306.36 37.71 46.51 250.00 4,289.50 39.11 429.75 1,316.98 320.00 114.44 332.00 155.80 15.00 332.50 1,040.00 40.75 3,625.00 18.30 959.04 176.00 136.86 18.27 585.03 CHECK NO 32139 32140 32141 32142 32143 32144 32145 32146 32147 32148 32149 PAYROLL LIST . . GENERAL FUND - BILLS PAID SINCE JUNE 4, 1986 TO WHOM PAID Shorewood Nursery Tonka Auto and Body Supply Tonka Printing Co. Village Pump Warner True Value Hardware Water Products Company Weekly News, Inc. American National Bank Norwest Bank Minneapolis Orr-Schelen-Mayeron & Assoc. Acro-Minnesota, Inc. PURPOSE AMOUNT Honeysuckle Bushes Valves/Oil Office Supplies Gas for Mobil Street Sweeper Screws, etc. Water Meters Legal Notices Bond Payments Bond Payments Enginerring Fees - April '86 Office Supplies SUBTOTAL $ 184.25 26.26 258.35 18.90 15.04 824.96 187.40 5,871.50 305,924.10 7,152.96 203.54 347,898.34 200335 Void Void 0.0 200336 Daniel J. Vogt 80 hrs 881. 87 200337 Sandra L. Kennelly 80 hrs 611. 49 200338 Susan A. Niccum 80 hrs 450.44 200339 Nancy K. Buckentine 87.75hrs 380.53 200340 Evelyn T. Beck 80 hrs 752.12 200341 Void Void 0.0 200342 Brad ley" J... Nie 1 sen 80 hrs 747.78 200343 Void Void 0.0 200344 Dennis D. Johnson 80 hrs 581. 54 200345 Daniel J. Randa 11 80 hrs 581.54 200346 Howard Stark 82 hrs 532.86 200347 Ralph A. Wehle 82 hrs 518.08 200348 Donald E. Zdrazil 80 hrs 780.17 SUBTOTAL 6,818.42 TOTAL 354,716.76 -2- CHECK NO 4669 4670 4671 4672 4673 4674 4675 4676 4677 4678 4679 4680 4681 4682 4683 4684 4685 4686 4687 4688 4689 4690 4691 4692 4693 4694 4695 4696 4697 4698 4699 4700 4701 4702 4703 4704 4705 4706 4707 4708 4709 4710 . . LIQUOR FUND - BILLS PAID SINCE JUNE 4, 1986 TO WHOM PAID BellBoy Corp. Four Star Bar & Rest. Supply Day Distributing Co. Eagle Distributing Co. East Side Beverage Co. Griggs, Cooper & Co. Intercontinental Packaging Co. Johnson Brothers Wholesale Liq. Jude Candy & Tobacco Co. Mark VII Distributors, Inc. Minnesota Suburban News Minnesota Bar Supply, Inc. Nelson Enterprises North Star Ice Old Dutch Foods, Inc. Paustis & Sons Pepsi Cola Bottling Co. Pogreba Distributing Ed. Phillips & Sons Prior Wine Co. Quality Wine & Spirits Thorpe Distributing Co. Tombstone Pizza Corp. Twin City Wine Co. City of Shorewood Be llBoy Corp. Day Distributing Co. Eagle Distributing Co. Griggs, Cooper & Co. Intercontinental Packaging Johnson Brothers Wholesale Liq. Mark VII Distributors Thorpe Distributing Co. Nelson Enterprises North Star Ice Old Dutch Foods, Inc. Paustis & Sons Ed. Phillips & Sons Minn. Suburban News Prior Wine Co. Quality Wine & Spirits Royal Crown Beverage Co. PURPOSE AMOUNT Liquor purchases Misc purchases Beer Purchases Liquor purchases Beer purchases Liquor purchases Wine purchases Wine purchases Cigarette purchases Wine Purchases Advertising Misc purchases Shipping Expenses Misc purchases Misc purchases Wine purchases Pop purchases Beer purchases Wine purchases Wine purchases Sine purchases Beer purchases Misc purchases Wine purchases Regular Salaries Liquor purchases Beer purchases Liquor purchases Liquor purchases Wine purchases Wine purchases Wine purchases Beer purchases Shipping Expense Misc purchases Misc purchases Wine purchases Liquor purchases Advertising Wine purchases Wine purchases Pop purchases SUBTOTAL $ 742.12 13.65 1,406.00 2,517.46 4,754.55 1,560.15 317.76 1,172.16 726.66 3,419.80 264.12 190.74 231.00 13 7.63 58.41 128.76 471. 45 4,088.77 327.71 2,364.15 250.34 8,712.10 21.00 475.50 3,372.98 562.53 1,871.30 2,637.63 1,350.09 35.46 169.64 1,663.85 494.15 111. 50 138.45 51. 45 93.85 1,497.50 69.12 318.00 741. 58 69.20 49,600.27 -1- . . . CITY O.F SHOREWOOD MAYOR Robert Rascop COUNCIL Jan Haugen Tad Shaw Kristi Stover Robert Gagne ADMINISTRATOR Daniel J. Vogt 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD- SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 - (612) 474-3236 MEMORANDUM TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: BRAD NIELSEN DATE: 17 JUNE 1986 RE: COVINGTON VINE RIDGE P.U.D. - SIGN PERMIT FILE NO. 405 (83.46) Mr. Wayne Tauer, Landscape Architect with Terrestrial Design, Inc., has requested approval of a sign permit for the Covington Vine Ridge project. The proposed sign (shown on Exhibits A and B, attached) will be located on Covington Road at the east entry of Vine Ridge Road (see location map - Exhibit C, attached). Signs are regulated in Section 200.03 Subd. 11 of the Shorewood Zoning Ordinance. Relative to P.U.D. 's the Ordinance states: "Signs permitted in P.U.D. 's shall be as approved by the City Council for each development and shall be consistent with the requirements for the district most closely associated with each use in the P.U.D." Since the project is entirely single-family residential, the provisions of Section 200.03 Subd. lle(l) should be reviewed. Following is how the proposed sign complies with the Ordinance: 1. Number of Signs. Subd. lle(l) allows one sign facing each street. Since the Covington Vine Ridge project is bordered by Covington Road and Vine Hill Road they are allowed two signs. one is proposed at this time. bordering both Only 2. Size. The Ordinance allows area identification signs to be as large as 32 square feet in area. The proposed sign contains slightly more than 20 square feet of area (50" X 60"). A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore ,?A . . Re: Covington Vine Ridge PUD - Sign Permit 17 June 1986 3. Location. As prescribed by th~.Ordinance the sign is to be located at the entry of a dedicated street. The location of the sign also complies with Section 200.03 Subd. 2h. which specifies visibility clear- ance at intersections. Nothing over 30 inches in height can be located in a 30' X 30' triangle formed by the intersecting street r.o.w. lines (see Exhibit C). 4. Height. high. The height. The Ordinance allows monument type signs to be eight feet proposed sign will be approximately five and a half feet in 5. Illumination. While the Ordinance allows sign of this type to be indirectly illuminated, lighting is not proposed by the applicant. Given the conformance of the proposed sign to Shorewood's sign regula- tions, it is recommended that the sign be approved as submitted. BJN/erm I cc: Dan Vogt Glenn Froberg Jim Norton Wayne Tauer -2- I. .- f\... '" '--~ '-i~'~. . I-'~i';- ~l! l' t ~ /.,~t / ' 'c. . ,~/ ~ L4~J"'v , , /i;'- ~,~ i -ft_ '~, ~~r .:At)~, "1?J5~ _l~~t;"~~~1tZ4~ t(.J~. (,b" j. ,~i',.-'" I<'~~~!~I 11 ~~~!lll~ ~. . ~.~. i It~'~~. -~ 'A t--I I - ..- ~ '. f' ~ . , I' ).... I . ... . r" I ~ ~ . , ..' !'-.- -/, ~ :" '~V" ." I I 1 I 1 -~ ~- .... .~t ~ I ,1 f" ~~lelC- ~ i ~: ) I 5f)' _ , VINE · ~~ ~ol I : I' . ~~ "', - A~ 1 I I i~. ~".. RIDGE .J~~ If \~ I I I ~Jcv, ! I .....-! ~i A.. ..... ~I'>.~'~ J II 1 )I/{.~ ~ ~ "J~" " "I"} I I I" . "<~ 'i .,.~; "^'-, f.~ j11 ~~z'" '\\j r '~~ '-.. ~,.~ I .~ I J I J f ~ ,~.'~ \ I~' ~ J- n' ".~.' . ~ ~ \ 1 1 // 1/, '- 'Me -.~/.; ~.. I' " "~I--.:,, 1 I~, ..A.. j "(0;. \ \ ~; >> '.'.,' I -.l 1 I" ... -- -, !: . ~.~' . - I I ',-"" ~ (tJ,. ~.. ~t.. J >. I J I J , r....J. ~' ~1L-{.A. (~).~ " 'I I 1 /;/; L~ ;:q :< ,~.If;/~/-1,.;.:tJ,::~,:4;;,i: ,: r 1 \ ~I~(~) ?~ t~(} c~ . /./. l! . .' r", r:,..-. ......~-L".t1 ,.,' ::,!{l . ......~ .'. . -' ......,. .....~, . . 1 :.~, 11 . '" /.. " }~' I II I 'I JI I I J I I I I I t .1 1 "1 1 I I I I] 1 , I J J J I I I J I l ~:t...~ ~';:.'" ... ... ..1 ,'" .', - 1 . ,. J. ,1, " . 'c~--~;,-~""~.'~~-"';J:q"j.'" " tL - . ""Il"; _ ~/ ,.~ ~ ~ -.. , , ~ ~ &~r1~ JuNlrefL " ..frONT//; ~~). P~L.L..AL~) WI . . i \ . .I ': .. . _. ~1~~- L /~~ :' . ~M!5r~rn.e. \ft..l:. \,:/' I I~,../ / . tM ~-- i /1/ /. " /' f/- '9l --- ~ \ jr~ , .' t. . :......1J i/; · ".~., :l!fii~1 ~<t~\~.~~*;;~ ~. ~" ~:D'J;~ ':f*fjg~ '''J!..f/.L.".r;-. : I rl~~ ~,.~~ l~ . ~"~N":' '" ,-.' '. r?l J 'n' ,... - '" <c~ . " " /~l 4.. ~ COVINGTON VINE RIDGE ENTRY SIGN AND PLANTING DET,AIL Ukibit A 1"-= 1'{~~:) " . ~ /I-~ .... 4 Ss ~ ~_. ~j>- I )~ ~ .~~~ j ~ . ' , ,'. . .'C-:" " ~~ \ ..~, ----"'f/I'fi:.' . . ,to 4- , - J) ~.. ~ ~ ,_., r:~ .. ' " ~~l<'''-' .:'~~,~~a:_,., ,,\. ".: ,,,.!.. i~;- . '"y~' :~,. <. . .:C -, -:- ~ i' :; '. f . ~-~~ ,. .' >. ,..-.- . W~~OO~o_omooo~m~~-oooog006! ~~qOO~Omomoooro~o~mOOOOOOO ~~~ci~~~~~~~~~;~~~ci~~~~~~~~ t-- 0 0 l.n ... , , ("J _4 -< IT) N If) I' U'l 1.0 ~. N ... - C\I en -- ..... H o :,:,,"':;.;l>" +..~ ,,", .'.,... .... " , . ..." o . ...Q ~ .- ~ ~~ 1,,'" ~ ~ ..... ~ \S''() +--~ ~ =; 7; ~ ;- ;u-~ ~ ~I ~L1 ~ ;: ;- ~lJ ~I.~; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ;U ~ ~ 'Il'. _ ',.? .-.:- ~:- ." 1.0 0 ,:) <:: <:!' c;r '!i !.!> ~ \0 lO ill 0 W \D LO oJ:" ,- If) \l) q- 0 ..A ;: \1". Ii' \J 0 0 . ';-: ...... .... 0 0 c' U 0 (\1 ,,'1 ( rr ~ q- ~ 0 L') N 0 0.- ~ u: 0 ~ to;"'" 0 ~ G :... :.. (n (T) :... rn n ;r) in ~ m Co en Co lo ~ to 0 opf. <: t!'\ U rJ b 0 ~.. 0 If) If) 0 0 c:: 0 0 0 0 :.> 0 0 0 N n /TI 0 ~, \:\ ll..: .. " " " . ., . . . . " . . . . · ... ' · · · · 0 " " ~ ~\ c:: ..... _. 0 1(" C' ( _ en ('1"1 If) If) a-. If) If) (() (r, OJ " \D lD lO 0 en \l) co CD 'D 0 ...... C:'.; c:) t~ lO ...... _ .... -..... 0 IT) 0 \. ;IJ N N ... 0 (\/ If) ~j z z v, (1) (l) '.'1 If) t... '"7 Z (fl Ul (ll Z Z Z UlIJ) IJ) IJ) IJ) tn Ul Ul Z ~ ._~~~l!l\D~IDmO_N/TIc;rIf)\O~romo-Nn~l!l ~ o~~~~~~~~~...._...._____--NNNNNN z ~~~~~rr~rrrrr~rr '<, ".. jivo~ .:fO v<>,,~ "c..:~/-;~/~~5 ~. . r 1 ' .:-----::::- . :. G ,-." , V i; Ir~- \~ : 'H ~~\- \ : ~) ..~ "'\.~ I ~&l:: .~~J l .(:..1 I '." ~~t ~~ /~,... "~ ''''IS) .~ I"~ " f,:b,..: .~ ~ '. a". ~' ,"g- '/1 -; ~. .~ So . 95'5'------- M..f1S,9 ______ 5' 0 t> LN - en ~__" l ..: I ~-. -- /(IN!'" ,.~ -..... -~, r: I I - - _.. ., .:'.' 2'. !. (..fv I ' -b~--- \": _ ~ ~~~ Ocr ~ \ ! ! r:. ~ _,_ _ c " ~,...., -'~ ;--; t- -1 ". - - - ...I L /"7 ,-.:-.:- \. --r'-3:~;:'-:"?}~'5Y,~.~-"----- .l. r ~.. ... - .... ''':: --':. ! --- , -- ; , - - -;;,... r___ '" , .... . .... -~... ; --- '- .... . CI\..) - :, - r:;., '':'''' ~_ -= -",.. .~..,,/ .-; ..; -;/ . .1 h 0 U ;:J,~ :<, ~'f 1 :\= ~?l. t · ~ -1' ~ : 1 Sf . I f ~ t' , ol. , -- OJ - , '=' ~ I " . ;::' ~: ".'<<~ '." .. 0/'..:' ":'~'1'7 I I " . . ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING AND REGULATING ALARM SYSTEMS, ISSUANCE OF PERMITS, AND PROVIDING A PENALTY FOR VIOLATION THEREOF IN THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD The City Council of the City of Shorewood ordains: CHAPTER 501: ALARM SYSTEMS AND PERMITS 501.01. STATEMENT OF POLICY. The City of Shorewood deems it necessary to provide for the regulations of alarm systems which are designed to signal the presence of a hazard requiring urgent attention to which public safety personnel are expected to respond, in order to protect the public health, safety and welfare. The City Council finds that the regulation of alarms is necessary in order to reduce the increasing frequency of false alarms in the City. The great number of and increasing frequency of these false alarms requires intensive, time-consuming efforts by the Department of Public Safety and thereby distracts from and reduces the level of services available to the rest of the community. This diminishes the ability of the City to promote the general health, welfare and safety of the community. In consideration for the necessity on the part of the City to provide numerous public safety services to all segments of the community, without an undue concentration of public services in one area to work to the detriment of members of the general public, it is hereby decided that the alarm systems shall be regulated through the permit process described below. 501.02. DEFINITIONS. As used herein, unless otherwise indicated, the following terms are defined as follows: Subd. a. "Alarm System" shall mean an assembly of equipment and devices (or a single device such as a solid state unit) arranged to signal the presence of a hazard. For the purposes of this ordinance, the alarm, when triggered, must be directly connected to a central monitoring agency which then notifies the police and/or fire departments of an emergency to which public safety personnel must respond, or may emit an audible signal which will require urgent attention and to which public safety personnel are expected to respond. #71J . . Subd. b. "Alarm User" shall mean the person, firm, partnership, association, corporation, company or organization .of any kind on whose premises an alarm system is maintained. "Alarm User" shall include persons occupying dwelling units for residential purposes. "Alarm User" shall not include persons maintaining alarm systems in automobiles. Subd. c. "False Alarms" shall mean the activation of an alarm system through mechanical failure, malfunction, improper installation, or the negligence of the owner or lessee of an alarm system or of his employees or agents. It does not include activation of the alarm by utility company power outages (except as set forth below) or by climatic conditions such as tornadoes, lightning, earthquakes, other violent conditions of nature, or any other conditions which are clearly beyond the control of the alarm manufacturer, installer or owner. Effective August 1, 1987, false alarms resulting from power outages shall be treated as other false alarms and counted as false alarms for permit purposes. Subd. d. "Person" shall mean any individual, partnership, corporation, association, cooperative or other entity. 501.03. PERMITS AND EXEMPTIONS. Subd. a. Permits. Every alarm user who, within a twelve-month period, incurs more than -two (2) false police alarms, or more than one (1) false fire alarm shall be required to obtain an alarm user permit. Subd. b. Review of Permit. The Chief of Police shall review the issuance of all alarm permits. Subd. c. Process for Issuance of Permit. Upon receipt and determination of the third false police alarm report, or the second false fire alarm report at an address within a twelve-month period, the Chief of Police, after review, shall notify the City Clerk who shall then assess the alarm user for an alarm user's permit. The assessment invoice shall be sent by certified mail. The alarm user must submit the required permit fee to the City Clerk within ten (10) working days after receipt of the assessment invoice in order to continue to use his alarm system. Any subsequent false police or fire alarms at that -2- . . address within a period of slX ~nths from the date of issuance of the permit shall automatically revoke that permit and the process must then be repeated. After expiration of the six-month period, the process shall be repeated at such time as the alarm user incurs more than two (2) false police alarms, or more than one (1) false fire alarm within a twelve-month period. Subd. d. Duration of Permit. All permits, unless otherwise revoked, will expire twelve months from date of issue. Subd. e. Exemptions. The provisions of this chapter are not applicable to audible alarms affixed to automobiles. 501.04. REQUIREMENTS AND DUTIES. Subd. a. False Alarm Reports. The Chief of Police may at his discretion, require a false alarm report to be filed by the alarm user with the Public Safety Department, within a time period to be specifi.ed by the Public Safety Department. If the Public Safety Department determines that a false alarm has occurred at an address, the alarm user at that address may submi~ a written report to the Public Safety Department to explain the cause of the alarm activation. If the Public Safety Department determines that the alarm was caused by conditions beyond the control of the alarm user, the alarm will not be counted as a false alarm at that address. Subd. b. "False Alarms" will be excused if they are the result of an effort or order to upgrade, install, test, or maintain an alarm system and if the Public Safety Department is given notice in advance of said upgrade, installation, test and maintenance. 505.05. PROHIBITIONS. Subd. a. "Alarm Systems Utilizing Taping or Prerecorded Messages." No person shall install, monitor, or use and possess an operative alarm which utilizes taped or prerecorded messages which deliver a telepone alarm message to the police or fire department. 501.06 PERMIT FEES. Subd. a. The fee for alarm user's permits shall be: Police - Fifty Dollars ($50.00); Fire - One hundred fifty Dollars ($150.00). -3- . . Subd. b. After expiration of an alarm user's permit, no subsequent permit shall be required until such time as the alarm user incurs more than two (2) false police alarms, or more than one (1) false fire alarms within a twelve-month period. 501.07. REVOCATION AND SUSPENSION OF PERMIT. Subd. a. Basis for revocation or suspension. In addition to the automatic revocation process described in Section 3, the Public Safety Department may suspend or revoke any alarm user permit issued pursuant to this ordinance if the Public Safety Department finds that any of the following occur: 1. That any provision or condition of this ordinance has been violated by an alarm user or his agents; 2. That an alarm system has actuated an excessive number of false alarms; 3. That the alarm user has knowingly made false statements in or regarding his application for an alarm user's permit; 4. That the alarm user has failed to correct or remove, within a reasonable period, violations of this ordinance after receipt of notice to do so; 5. That the continued effectiveness of the alarm user permit constitutes a substantial threat to the public peace, health, safety or welfare. All alleged violations defined above shall be investigated by the Public Safety Department. The alarm user shall be given notice of the proposed revocation or suspension and be provided an opportunity to informally present evidence to the Chief of Police prior to the final decision on revocation or suspension. Anyone aggrieved by the decision of the Chief of Police may appeal that decision to the City Council. 501.08. CRIMINAL PENALTIES. Subd. a. Any alarm user who continues to use an alarm system after receiving notice of revocation or suspension by the Public Safety Department shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and -4- . . upon conviction thereof, shall be punishable by a fine of not more than seven hundred dollars ($700.00) and by imprisonment not to exceed ninety (90) days. Subd. b. Any person required by this ordinance to obtain an alarm user's ~ermit who knowingly fails to do so shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon conviction thereof, shall be punishable by a fine of not more than seven hundred dollars ($700.00)and by imprisonment not to exceed ninety (90) days. 501.09. SEPARABILITY. Every section, provision, or part of this ordinance is declared separable from every other section, provision or part; and if any section, provision or part of any ordinance shall be held invalid, it shall not affect any other section, provision or part thereof. 501.10. REPEALER. Upon the effective date of this Ordinance, Ordinance No. 146 is hereby repealed. 501.11. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage of publication according to law. this ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD day of , 1986. Robert Rascop, Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk -5- . . Draft June 18, 1986 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE PERTAINING TO DISPOSAL OF GARBAGE, RUBBISH, AND TRASH, AND ESTABLISHING CONDITIONS FOR LICENSING COLLECTORS OF SAME The City Council of the City of Shorewood does ordain: CHAPTER 406. REFUSE COLLECTION AND DISPOSAL 4Q6.01. DEFINITIONS. subd. 1. Words and Phrases. For the purposes of this ordinance, the following words and phrases have the meanings given them in this section. subd. 2. Garbage means organic waste resulting from the preparation of food and decayed and spoiled food from any source. subd. 3. Recyclables include paper, plastic, tin cans, aluminum, motor oil, glass, and other metal goods, each separated or otherwise prepared so as to be acceptable to the recycling center where they are to be deposited. subd. 4. Rubbish means inorganic solid waste such as tin cans, glass, paper, ashes, sweepings, etc. subd. 5. Refuse includes garbage and rubbish. 406.02. GENERAL REGULATIONS. subd. 1. Unauthorized Accumulation. Any unauthorized accumulation of refuse on any premises is a nuisance and prohibited. subd. 2. Refuse in Streets, etc. No person shall place any refuse in any street, alley, or public place or upon any private property except in proper containers for collection. No person shall throw or deposit refuse in any stream or other body of water. subd. 3. Scattering of Refuse; Composting. No person shall bury any refuse in the City except in an approved sanitary landfill, but leaves, grass clippings, and easily biodegradable, non-poisonous garbage may be composted on the premises where such refuse has been ^J;!~, ,/C) _-I i C- . . accumulated. Garbage may be composted only in a rodent-proof structure and in an otherwise sanitary manner and after the Council gives its approval to such composting after it finds that the composting will be done in accordance with these standards. 406.03. DISPOSAL REQUIRED. Every person shall, in a sanitary manner, dispose of refuse that may accumulate upon property owned or occupied by him. Garbage shall be collected, or otherwise lawfully disposed of, at least once each week during the entire year. No person shall permit refuse to be picked up from his premises by an unlicensed collector. 406.04. CONTAINERS. subd. 1. General Requirement. Every householder, occupant, or owner of any residence and any restaurant, business establishment, or commercial establishment shall provide on the premises one or more containers to receive and contain all refuse which may accumulate between collections. All normal accumulations of refuse shall be deposited in such containers. Leaves, trimmings from shrubs, grass clippings, shavings, excelsior, and other rubbish of similar volume and weight may be stored in closed containers not meeting the requirements of subd. 2. subd. 2. Container Requirements. Each container shall/be water-tight, impervious to insects and rodents, fireproof, and shall not exceed 90 gallons in capacity, except that any commercial or business establishment having refuse volume exceeding two cubic yards per week shall provide bulk or box-type refuse storage containers of a type approved by the City. Exempted from this provision shall be construction activities which are temporary in nature and do not extend over a period greater than thirty (30) days. Containers shall be maintained in good and sanitary condition. Any container not conforming to the requirements of this chapter or having ragged or sharp edges or any other defect likely to hamper or injure the person collecting the contents shall be promptly replaced after notice by the City. subd. 3. Use of Containers. Refuse shall be drained of liquid and household garbage shall be wrapped before being deposi ted in a container-.. Highly inflammable or . explosive material shall not be placed in containers. -2- 406.05. subd. 1 subd. 2 subd. 3 subd. 4 subd. 5 subd. 6 subd. 7 .,.'.'", :7'. . COLLECTION CONTRACT Bids and ~ The City Council shall contract with one or more collectors after receiving bids or proposals for such purposes, for collection of garbage and refuse from residences in the various portions of the City of Shorewood on such terms and for such periods as the Council may determine. Unit Price Contract. The contracts with each collector shall be based on unit price. Contractor Record Keeping. Each collector shall keep accurate records of all his collections and shall report monthly to the City Administrator on all of his collections. Collector Office. Each collector shall have at all times a registered office and notify the City Clerk of any change in said address of office. Equipment. Each collector shall furnish his own equipment and personnel for the collection of garbage and refuse. Exclusive Contracts. Only collectors holding contracts with the City (or their subcontractors) shall be authorized to collect the garbage from any residence within the City of Shorewood and no other persons shall make a business or collect a fee for collection of garbage within the City of Shorewood. Collectors will be held responsible for all work performed by their subcontractors, and all subcontractors shall be subject to approval by the Ci ty Admil.i..:.tr.1tbJ;:. Effect of State Regulation. The garbage and refuse so collected by each collector shall be disposed of in a manner as provided by Minnesota Statutes and Regulations. -3- " . . 406.06. COLLECTION LICENSE REQUIRED subd. 1. License Required. Each collector awarded a contract by the City of Shorewood shall be required to obtain a license. subd. 2. Application. Each collector desiring to be licensed shall make application to the City Clerk on a prescribed form. The application shall set forth: a. the name and address of the applicant; b. a description of each piece of equipment proposed to be used in the collection; c. the place to which the refuse is to be hauled; d. the manner in which the refuse is to be disposed of. subd. 3. Insurance. No license shall be issued until the applicant files with the clerk a current policy of public liability insurance including coverage for general liability, premises, operations, and all vehicles to be used by the applicant in the licensed business. The limits of coverage of such insurance shall be established by Council resolution from time to time. subd. 4. License Fees. Licenses shall be is~ued for a period of one year. The license fee shall be established by Council resolution from time to time. 406.07. REFUSE COLLECTION SCHEDULE. Each contract collector shall collect refuse from only those residents within that portion of the City covered by his contract with the City. Collecting shall be made according to the following minimum schedule: daily from hotels, restaurants, and other premises, which in the judgment of the City require such collection, and weekly from residences and other premises. No refuse shall be collected before 6:00 a.m. or after 8:00 p.m. of any day. -4- . . 406.08. COLLECTION VEHICLES. Every refuse collection vehicle shall be lettered on the outside so as to identify the licensee. Every vehicle used for hauling garbage shall be covered, leak-proof, durable, and of easily cleanable construction. Every vehicle used for hauling refuse shall be sufficiently airtight, and so used as to prevent unreasonable quantities of dust, paper, or other collected materials to escape. Every vehicle shall be kept clean to prevent nuisances, pollution, or insect-breeding, and shall be maintained in good repair. Enclosed refuse vehicles shall be confined to public streets, roadways, alleys and to commercial parking lots and shall not be driven upon residential property on driveways unless authorized by the owner. The above provision shall not apply to 3/4 ton (or less) pickup trucks used as auxiliary vehicles engaged in picking up refuse and placing it in enclosed vehicles. Such pickup trucks shall not be filled to such height that refuse spills therefrom; any refuse spilled or dropped shall be immediately picked up. 406.09. WEIGHT RESTRICTIONS PERTAINING TO COLLECTION VEHICLES. All collection vehicles shall be subject to the provisions of Shorewood Ordinance No. 163. 406.10. SERVICE CHARGE. subd. 1. Charges for Collection Service. The City of Shorewood shall charge each person or residence unit a minimum charge as established by Council resolution from time to time. Such charge shall be determined by the Council, and the statements for such charges shall be sent to the person served at such intervals as the Council shall determine. subd. 2. Separate Fund Account. All income from the operation of the refuse collection system and the record of expense and operation shall be accounted for separately from the general City fund. subd. 3. Customer Statements. Statements for charges for garbage service for the period shall be mailed to each customer on or before the 20th day of January, April, July and October of each year. Such statements shall be due and payable to the City Treasurer on or before the first day of the second month following the quarterly period covered by such statement. -5- . . subd. 4. Late Payment Penalty. If payment is not made by the first day of the third month following the quarterly period covered by such statement, a penalty of 10% shall be added to the amount due on such bill. It shall be the duty of the City to endeavor to collect delinquent accounts as promptly as possible. subd. 5. Assessment Against Property for Nonpayment. All delinquent accounts may be certified by the clerk who shall prepare an assessment roll each year providing for assessments of delinquent accounts against the respective property served. This assessment roll shall be delivered to the City Council for adoption on or before October 1 of each year, and upon approval thereof the clerk shall certify to the County Auditor the amount due and the County Auditor shall thereupon enter such amount as part of the tax levy on such premises to be collected during the ensuing year. Such action may be optional or subsequent to taking legal action to collect delinquent accounts. 406.11. BURNING OF GARBAGE, REFUSE, AND INQUSTRIAL WASTES. No person shall dispose of garbage, refuse and industrial wastes within the City limits at any time by open burning, or cause, suffer, allow or permit open burning of garbage, refuse or industrial wastes at any time in any outdoor fire, outdoor incinerator, can, recepticle or device. 406.12. PENALTY. Any person who shall violate any provision of this Ordinance shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. 406.13. REPEALER. Upon the effective date of this Ordinance, Ordinance No. 176 is hereby repealed. 406.14. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication according to law. -6- MEMO TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: . . CITY OF SHOREWOOD MAYOR Robert Rascop COUNCI L Jan Haugen Tad Shaw Kristi Stover Robert Gagne ADMINISTRA TOR Daniel J. Vogt 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROADe SHOREWOOD. MINNESOTA 55331 e (612) 474-3236 MAYOR AND COUNCILMEMBERS DAN VOGT Jf.(I JUNE 19, 1986 GARBAGE ORDINANCE, 1st DRAFT Earlier this year, several Council discussions took place relative to an ordinance which would create a contracting system for garbage col- lection in the City of Shorewood. To comply. with the date you set to again discuss this issue, staff hereby presents the 1st draft of such an ordinance. The ordinance contains all of the prOV1S10ns of the Licensing Ordinance No. 176 as well as several new provisions which deal with the con- tracting of haulers in the City. The draft allows the Council to take bids ~ proposals. The advantage to this is that a proposal could be negotiated. Also, the Council can set the various portions of the City that the contract would cover. Relative to this, staff has devel- , oped a map which would divide the City up into four (4) districts. The map is discussed later in this memo. Using this type of system, the City could further specify that one contractor could not cover more than one district. This would be up to the Council. The draft will further allow a contractor to subcontract a portion of the~distritt to another contractor. The subcontractor will need to be approved by the City. As we discussed, the draft ordinance states that the City will do the billing on a quarterly basis with the sewer and water bills. Sandy may be able to discuss with yo~ exactly how this will work on the compu- ter. She may also be able to discuss the amount additional of staff time this will take. For discussion purposes, I have attached a map which proposes the loca- tion of the four (4) districts. These location~ did not attempt to evenly divide residences into each district~ Rather, the division lines were placed in areas that seemed to make the most sense as to a logical and clear-cut division line for the garbage firms. To divide the City' up equally as far as residences are concerned, w.e may be directing different firms cf.r:cu'ito.usJ,y through the City. If the Council feels :,j'i" -1- A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore ()(~- .~ . . Garbage ordinance, cont'd 6/19/86 comfortable with the staff proposal, we will then count the residences in each area to give the contractors an idea as to the number of service units in each area. At this point, the garbage collection firms have not been informed of this draft ordinance discussion. Staff has discussed this and feels that the Council should review the first draft. If the draft is unac- ceptable, staff can redraft prior to a future meeting. If the draft is acceptable, then perhaps a public meeting should be set whereby residents as well as garbage collection firms are invited to comment. In any event it was felt that staff wants to be sure that the desired ordinance is presented for public input. Finally, the next step in the process following the passage of an ordinance is to develop a model contract based upon the provisions of said ordinance. This contract would more specifically outline all of the terms the City wishes to impose of a contractor for garbage collection. Please call if you have any questions relative to this issue prior to Monday night. -2- .. . . ~StI#" !i,,: I J .~ ~ff ~.~~ eft .. I ~. t,\.if' 'lAl&A6€ JJJjTII." r AJAr ; / ~o ~o o / / " .~--=--- o.~~ i I I I I I l , "- , , , ........... ~. .' / / / >- , '..... / --- ~-.-'.. ORO~O " .... - --- ----- e~e ~. 1, :., '-~ "_.:... = - "Olt,'~ . It...... - L a.# MIft",fo""a La.. W,I't",.'o"ka I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1-. I CITY OF SCALI - SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA ~ -&I - 1M ~ IOllO X lI'DEX 1'0 STREi:I'S Ac&d.~ Avenll...... .F-L2 Atton ~oad........ ..F-4 Aale. ~oad........ ..~9 AnthOD3 T.rr.e......8-20 AppL. Road..........o-l~ aev...l, Driv........0-4 alreb a LlI1't Road... .~7 3l1l. Ri4p taD......o-) BOIlL4.r Cuel.......0-2 arackett. Road.... ..o-L~ 3r&D4 Clrcl.........'J-L7 BrOOl. 301l1evar4.. ...~ZO CaJed :...n...........G-4 ~ar'hnal ::Tlve...... :;"'14 ";athc.art ::-1.1.........;..,; ~h&ak& Road..........~t2 ':hriet... :...u. ?'t...E.-ld Cbrut... tAlI;. ~eI. ..F-17 iJl.r ut.... taD....... 0-17 Cbllrcll Road........ .0-5 CLov... t.&De.........E-ll Clllll t.&De............-9 Clllb V.ll., Road....0-10 COllntr1 Clllb Road...F-10 COllnt, Road 19.... ..~lO COV1~0. Road......E-20 Devonohu. Clrcl.. ..3-L9 !l1.vllioa. S\r..t.....E-Lo E&atgah .~lrcl..... ..-5 Echo Road......... ..E-LO ~ooc1 R0a4.......D-4 E14... i'Ilrn......... .F-a Elaridp Circl.... ..C-5 i:Ilrell:. Roa4......... g..d i:Ilrelta ..,..........E-7 Ezc.loior Blv4.... ..C-L9 F.H.. Pl.c.........A-16 Famaort 91'1"..... .1l-18 For.ot Driv.........B-18 Galpin Lak. Road.. ..F-l3 G.lpl11 taD......... .0-13 GaM." R0a4........ .A-18 Gllleth ~.......E-lL I';l.nc~ Rou....... .:'-12 lllell Ro&cl........... E-9 GrMt tArona R4.....E-6 Gr&l1t Str..t..~.....F_l3 Hlllendal. R0&4.....F-l6 Howar4. POlnt ~C!.. ..::-3 Xdl_1.14 P&tb.......6-l8 Iol&D4 ./10..........;)...) X.., taD............ .s-L8 lAi~t.brl4p ~d....3-l9 l.&tareth AnDll.....~l2 LIk. Lia4.. Drlv....o-ll Lak. VirctAia Dr....0-4 Lak..., Terr.ee.....A-l8 Lee Circl...........c-8 L.l.l.c taD...........0-16 L.l.ll.oocl Road...... ..A-l8 II.llar4 ~.........o-a ~&lUtou Lane....... .:-9 l'.- t.&De... ...... ...-6 II...ar R0a4..........i-l9 llapl. AvOftIl......... c-o lIapl. R14p ~....o-) II.,clo.... ,'u.......:;...Lj IIcLA~n R0a4........ .F-~2 ..adowvi.. .~......E-~ MarTI t.a.ae.......... ~ ~ 7 II1ll St....,.........:;...~ti ~\M.\Onlta , ~ va.... . . A-l .. 'haneton&a :":"1.".... .E-l, ~W"r.., .5\:-.4n........=-~4 Murra-r :!l ~ ~ :-.oad.... J-~ J ~.l.lr.. :rt..,........~ Cak ~,dp ;,rcl... ..;)...6 Park Str..t.........F_~2 Pll1. ..nli......... ......3 Pleaaaat lY.D~.....~9 RadU.Oll En.r&l1e....~16 kad.l..0n !na ito.....E-1.9 Repa\'. .....~...... .:5-19 Rldp Ro&4..........F-l~ R1.V1Ua :....&:l.........~ll ~...hc .aT..........3-10 St.llb...'. :aT Rei.. .r.-L~ Se&aaa. JrlV........~ Sh&4T Hlll. ;lrel...~21 Sh&4T llU~. 20&4....C-2l ~ L&l1a..........;-Zl 3hor. Ro&4.......... E- L ~ Shorewood ~.......E-l~ 3alt~town LAtt.......t-O SalthtOWD ,,&4......E-9 St.t. HW)' 7.........~L~ S tar Lan............ E-~ Str.wberr7 '~......c-o SllbllrbllA Dr......... .C-L8 S~l\ Avenue.....t .G-1) Sunnyv.le L&n.......~7 Sllv&l1 iAD..........;)...6 Teal CU'cl..........o-O T.. :~ul...........C-iQ ;bird. Av.I'N.........L-i.t:t T'.b... iAD..........~ll l.ae",ooc1 ;lrcl... ....7 'al1eJW0C4 ~......;)"'7 Vlne 5tr..'.........3-2C '{In. HUl ;,0&4......&-.21 .edgawooc1 ~lV......E-8 ...t Lan............ 4- L8 l/. 62114 Stn.t......0-5 l/114 Ro.. Lan....... 1:-7 .ooc1 Drive......... .0-10 Wooc1.a4 Pl.c........ 1:-2 .o~o14. Road....... 1:-) Y.llOW.tOll. !TaU.. .F-a . . . RESOLUTION NO. WHEREAS, Donald Schafer has made formal application to the City of Shorewood for permission to construct a dock on certain property owned by him located within an R District on Timber Lane in the City of Shorewood ; and WHEREAS, no principal residential dwelling exists on said property; and WHEREAS, the Shorewood Zoning Ordinance, Section 200.03, Subd. 14b, prohibits the construction of a dock on land located within an R District until a principal dwelling is constructed thereon, or until four-fifth's (4/Sths) approval of the City Council has been first obtained; and WHEREAS, said application was reviewed before the Planning Commission and a Public Hearing was held on May 6, 1986; and WHEREAS, a further review of said application was had before the City Council at their regular meeting on June 9, 1986; and WHEREAS, the City Attorney was directed to draft a formal resolution denying the applicant's application to construct said dock on the subject property. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Councll of the City of Shorewood as follows: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. That the property owned by the applicant on the Timber Lane site has no principal dwelling located thereon. 2. That the subject property is not a buildable site pursuant to Shorewood ordinance, nor is it contiguous to any buildable site owned by the applicant. 7D . . . 3. That no dock presently exists on said property which could be construed to be a "grandfathered" structure existing prior to present ordinance. 4. That applicant's proposed use of the subject property as a dock site for the benefit of parties residing on other property located remotely from the subject property is incompatible with the use of property within the immediate area. CONCLUSIONS That based on the foregoing, the City Council of the City of Shorewood hereby denies applicant's formal application to construct a dock on the site purposed by the applicant. this ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Shorewood day of , 1986. ~";;''" MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: RE: TITLE NO. . . MAYOR Robert Rascop COUNCI L Jan Haugen Tad Shaw Kristi Stover Robert Gagne ADMINISTRATOR Daniel J. Vogt CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD . SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 . (612) 474-3236 MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL BRAD NIELSEN 19 JUNE 1986 CHRISTMAS LAKE ACCESS - NO PARKING SIGNS 405 (85.29) An issue which arose during the review of the Christmas Lake Access proposal was the potential for parking problems in the nearby vicinity of. the access site(primarily Christmas Lake Road and Radisson Road). The staff had always suggested that "no parking" signs be posted in potential problem areas. In response to a request by Mike Pierro for a handicapped parking space in front of his dock for the use of his son, Councilman Shaw suggested the, possibility of "parking by permit" rather than a complete prohibition of parking. Not only would this accommodate Mr. Pierro's son, but it would also allow other residents along Christmas Lake Road and Radisson Road to occas- sionally park on the street. Although I agree with Councilman Shaw's suggestion, the City Attorney has advised me that we must amend Ordinance No. 53, whichistablishes the authority to regulate parking, to provid~ piocedures and criteria for- issuing permits. Assuming the Council is agreeable with this idea, we will attempt to have a draft of the amendment available at the meeting on Monday night. While we don't normally like to present material the night of a meeting, we feel it is important to have some type of parking signs in place by the Fourth of July, the proposed opening date for the public access. If there are any problems with the Ordinance, it may be desirable to at least post temporary parking signs until the Ordinance can be adopted. If there are any questions relative to this matter, please do not hesitate to contact my office. . cc: Dan Vogt Glenn Froberg Jim Norton A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore C)L] ,~ . 't" . 5680 Christmas Lake Point Shorewood, Minnesota 55331 June 17, 1986 Mr. Daniel Vogt, Administrator City of Shorewood 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, Minnesota 55331 Dear Mr. Vogt: I sent the Mayor a letter dated June 4, (copy enclosed), which explained that a mortgage company would not lend money to purchase a house in Shorewood. This loan was partially secured by the structure, and the city zoning ordinance did not guarantee them that the house could be rebuilt on its existing founda- tion if substantially destroyed. Obviously, if good properties like this cannot be sold, we have a problem which requires attention. After discussing this with the Mayor and Tad Shaw, I am requesting this matter be brought before the City Council at their next meeting and that the Council direct the city attorney to draft a resolution or statement of policy which will prevent this from happening again. If you wish me to attend this meeting to explain the situation in more detail, please let me know. Thank you. Sincerely, ~ttk ~ Keith J. Arneson Office: 473-8874 Home: 474-8648 Enclosure cc: Robert Rascop, Mayor Tad Shaw, Councilman Paul Anderson Doug Carney, Attorney at Law 9c> ~, . . . MAYOR Robert Raleop COUNCI L Jan Haugen Tad Shaw Kristi Stover Robert Gagne ADMINISTRATOR Daniel J. Vagt CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD . SHOREWOOD. MINNESOTA 55331 . (612) 474-3236 12 June 1986 Mr. Peter Ruliffson Edina Financial Services 6800 France Ave. South Re: Zoning Question - 5740 Christmas Lake Point Dear Mr. Ruliffson: Ms. Kathryn Stitt, a realtor with Edina Realty, has requested ~hat we send you a letter clarifying the zoning status of the ~bove-referenced property. She apparently takes exception to the determination made by Wiley Appraisal, Inc., a copy of which is attached hereto. With one minor exception, the appraiser's comments are considered to be accurate. In the first paragraph, he refers to the residence in question as a "nonconforming use". This should read "nonconforming ~!!.~~!~!.!". If you've ever researched zoning ordinances, you will know that the provisions of Shorewood's Zoning Ordinance which pertain to the rebuilding of nonconforming structures are not at all uncommon. It is worth noting that the exception contained in Section 200.03 Subd. Ig is decidedly less restrictive than many zoning ordinances, including Shorewood's previous ordinance. If you have any questions relative to our Zoning Ordinance, please do not hesitate to contact my office at 474-3236. ~;;~ {~-/ Bradley ~~lsen City Planner/Building Official cc: Dan Vogt Pat McKenna Keith Arneson Kathryn Stitt Mayor and City Council enc. A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore . . . MII4. ~ I<dly 429 East Lake Street Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 (612) 473-8874 REAL ESTATE June 4, 1986 Mayor Robert Rascop 4560 Enchanted Point Mound, Mn. 55364 Dear Mayor Rascop: I recently listed and sold Paul Anderson's house at 5740 Christmas Lake Point. The buyer applied for financing at Edina Financial Services. During the appraisal process the appraiser, Pat McKenna of Wiley Appraisal, Inc., had a conversation with our city planner. The unfortunate results of which are enclosed. If mortgage companies are allowed to believe that our new zoning ordinance may prevent the buyer of a house like Paul Anderson's from rebuilding on the same site if it is substantially destroyed, there are many other homes in Shorewood including Tad Shaw's and my own which would become virtually unsaleable because a buyer could not obtain financing. In order to assist Paul Anderson in selling his house and to prevent mortgage companies and appraisers from misinterpreting our zoning ordinance, lam requesting that you write a strongly worded letter to Peter Ruliffson of Edina Financial Services, 6800 France Avenue South, Edina, Minnesota 55435, explaining the City Council's intent regarding houses like Paul's when the new zoning ordinance was adopted. Thank you in advance for your prompt assistance in resolving this matter. Sincerely, \ J~JJt Llvrw4c~ Keith J. Arneson Sales Associate Enclosure CC: Peter Ruliffson Paul Anderson Tad Shaw . . June 18, 1986 City of Shorewood 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, MN 55331 Re: Louis and Colleen Bellamy 5795 Covington Road Shorewood, MN 55331 Dear Sir or Madam: We reside at 5795 Covington Road, Shorewood, Minnesota. We presently own our own well and septic tank. We would like to be served by municipal sewer and water, which is now being installed. Please let us know where and when the hook-up can be accomplished. Very truly yours, c~/!!:j7/ cc: Paul A. Skjervold i t)?} . MEMO TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: . . CITY OF SHOREWOOD MAYOR Robert Rascop COUNCI L Jan Haugen Tad Shaw Kristi Stoller Robert Gagne ADMINISTRA TOR Daniel J. Vogt 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD . SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 . (612) 474-3236 MAYOR AND COUNCILMEMBERS DAN VOGT Dtfi JUNE 18, 1986 1987 BUDGET PREPARATION This year, staff intends to have the 1987 Budget to you at an earlier date than previous years. To accomplish this goal, we need direction on certain items to aid in preparation. Below is a list of said items. 1. Direction is needed for total General Fund expenditures, such as per- centage increase, decrease or stay the same as 1986. 2. Amount of expenditure desired in major areas of the budget, such as road construction, equipment purchases, contingency fund amount, etc. for 1987. This year road construction amount is $250,000. If you wish to leave this the same and give staff discretion as to equipment and contingency, that would be fine. 3. Mill Rate - Levy Amount The mill rate in 1985 was 22.914. The rate in 1986 was 23.640. We need direction as to desired mill rate for 1987. Further, it would be very helpful to have some kind of mill rate goal over the next five years. Also, direction is needed as to the levy amount. Last year, the City again levied to its statutory limit of $260.28 per capita or $1,209,261. Thus, the increase in mill rate. Because of increased valuation, it may be possible that expenditures be increased, the levy increased and the mill rate remain constant. In any event, this direction is critical to have to prepare the budget. 4. Salaries - We must know how much of an increase to use for budgeting salaries. The Finance Department can then figure the amounts for 1987. This step in the budget process can start now. We need this item for union and non-union employees. In the 1985 Stanton Report, the overall survey showed a salary increase of 4.9%. Shorewood's overall increase was 4.75% for non-union and 4% for union employees. This shows that we are in the range of other metropolitan cities. The 1986 Stanton Report will come out in July. This reflects salaries as of February of 1986. -1- A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore loA MEMO TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: . . CITY OF SHOREWOOD MAYOR Robert Rascop COUNCI L Jan Haugen Tad Shaw K risti Stover Robert Gagne ADMINISTRATOR Daniel J. Vogt 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD . SHOREWOOD. MINNESOTA 55331 . (612) 474-3236 MAYOR AND COUNCILMEMBERS DAN VOGT J::qf JUNE 18, 1986 METROPOLITAN DEVELOPMENT AND INVESTMENT FRAMEWORK As my memo dated May 7, 1986 explained (copy attached), the Metropolitan Council is in the process of updating the Metropolitan Development and Investment Framework (MDIF). I explained at the Council meeting on May 12 that prior to recommending authorization of any contribution toward the hiring of John Boland and Associates, I wanted to see the scope of services to be provided. I have now received a copy of the Contract for Services between the Boland firm and the City of Chanhassen. A copy of the contract is also attached. Although the services to be provided as presented are not lengthy, I feel that they do what we want to be done. At this point the cities ofl Chanhassen, Eden Prairie, Shakopee, Victoria, Waconia, and the County of Carver have contributed toward Mr. Boland's services. The request for funding from Shorewood is $500 toward the contract amount of $7,500. Any contribution amount which is short of the contract amount will be paid by Chanhassen. Any amounts over the contract amount will be proportionately refunded. As my previous memo stated, the requested share for Shorewood could be designated to my budget code 5235 with the amounts expended for Labor Relations Associates which will be amended later this year. This item appears on your June 23 agenda for your consideration. Please contact me if you have any questions. A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore /{) 13 MEMO TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: . . CITY OF SHOREWOOD MAYOR Robert Raseop COUNCI L Jan Haugen Tad Shaw Kristi Stover Robert Gagne ADMINISTRATOR Daniel J. Vogt 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD . SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 . (612) 474-3236 MAYOR AND COUNCILMEMBERS DAN VOGT # MAY 7, 1981 METROPOLITAN DEVELOPMENT AND INVESTMENT FRAMEWORK Since early 1985, the Metropolitan Council has been updating its Metropolitan Development and Investment Framework (MDIF). The ~IDIF represents the Metropolitan Council's basic development and investment philosophy, a discussion of geographic policy areas, Council policy for these areas and their regional investment priority. Following this, the MDIF deals with planning and in- vestment procedures, including Council internal actions, the Council and metropolitan systems and the Council and local units of government. Finally, the document includes a work program and a set of appendices covering local forecasts and urban ser- vice area procedures. The greatest amount of concern staff has had with this document is in the forecasts. It has been staff's contention that the forecasts for popu1ation and households are low. Planner Nielsen and I have met with Metropolitan Council representatives to ap- peal for an adjustment. Also, at 7:30 P.M. on November 18, 1985, I appeared at a Public Hearing in Hopkins on behalf of Shorewood to plead our case. To date, an upward adjustment has been made. This adjustment, however, is still below our estimates. Because the estimates will guide the Met Council in their deci- sion-making process as to where growth and investments for in- frastructure improvements should take place, a number of com- munities in the southwest area of the region have begun to meet to formulate a strategy to get the Met Council to adjust the MDIF to look more favorably on the southwest area. Part of this strat- egy includes the hiring of a consultant to present the case from the southwest area from one unified front. Also, it is agreed that we must plead our perspective to the Met Council members themselves rather than staff. It is found that staff is extremely reluctant to change what they've proposed even if substantiation is made to dispute their recommendation. A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore . . Re: MDIF May 7, 1986 The governmental agencies that have been attending the meetings ~d are participating in this process are: Carver County, Scott County, Shorewood, Minnetrista, Eden Prairie, Prior Lake, Shakopee, Chaska, Chanhassen, Victoria, and Waconia. The group wishes to hire John Boland and Associates, governmental affairs consultants, to aid us in getting changes to the MDIF. If the City wishes to continue as part of this team, the group is looking for a cost share from each City. The Shorewood share could be $500 to $1000. By the meeting date on May 12, I hope to have the work program for Mr. Boland so I will know just what services will be provided for the funds spent. I would recommend the funds to be expended from the budget for City Administrator (Code 5235). This is the same coding used for Labor Relations Associates for union issues. As you know, this code will get amended later this year. If the Council chooses not to contribute financially, the south- west group would still like your support in the effort. The backing of the City would be helpful to the group in any form. This item appears on your May 12 meeting agenda for your consid- eration. Please contact me if you have any questions. DJV/nkb cc: Brad Nielsen - 2 - -,/ . . CONTRACT FOR SERVICES , This Agreement made and entered into between the City of Chanhassen and JOHN BOLAND & ASSOCIATES. 1. TERMS OF AGREEMENT That the term of this Agreement shall be from May 1, 1986 to September 1, 1986. 2. SERVICES TO BE PROVIDED A. Work to ensure that the concerns of Chanhassen and other cities in the southwest metropolitan area are heard and met during the adoption of the revised Metropolitan Development and Investment Framework. B. To work with both the staff and members of the Metropolitan Council to ensure that the goals of the city of Chanhassen are met during that process. 3. PAYMENT FOR SERVICES The city of Chanhassen shall compensate JOHN BOLAND & ASSOC- IA TES the ~sum total of $7,500.00. This will be made in two payments of $3,750.00 each. The first payment is due on June 1, 1986 and the second payment is due on August 1, 1986. 4. CANCELLA nON That this Agreement may be terminated by either party with or without cause upon written notice to the other given at least thirty (30) days prior to the date of said termination. 5. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR That it is agreed that nothing herein contained is intended or should be construed in any manner as creating or establishing the relationship of co-partners between the parties hereto or as constituting JOHN BOLAND & ASSOCIATES as agent, representative, or employee of the city of Chanhassen for any purpose or in any manner whatso- ever. JOHN BOLAND & ASSOCIATES is to be and shall remain an independent contract<Yr with respect to all services performed under this Agreement.. JOHN BOLAND & ASSOCIATES represents that it has, or will secure at its own expense, all personnel required in performing service AS under this Agreement. Any and all personnel of JOHN BOLAND & 'ASSOCI A TES, or other persons, while engaged in the performance of any work or services required by John Boland #' ... . . -2- &: Associates under this Agreement, shall have no contractual relation- ship with the city of Chanhassen and shaH not be considered em- ployees of the city of Chanhassen, and any and all claims that mayor might arise under the Workers' Compensaion Act of the State of Minnesota on behalf of said personnel or other persons while so engaged, and any and all claims whatsoever on behalf of any such person or personnel arising out of employment against JOHN BOLAND &: ASSOCIATES, its officers, agents, contractors, or employees shaH in no way be the responsibility of the city of Chanhassen, including without limitation, tenure rights, medical and hospital care, sick and vacation leaver, disability, Workers' Compensation, unemployment insurance, severance pay, and PERA. 6. INDEMNIFICATION That JOHN BOLAND &: ASSOCIATES further agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold the city of Chanhassen harmless from any liability claims, damages, costs, judgments, or expenses, including reasonable attorney's fees, actions, or causes of action arising out of any act or omission on the part of JOHN BOLAND &: ASSOCIATES or their authorized agents, servants, or employees in the performance of or with relation to any of the work or services provided, to be performed or . furnished by JOHN BOLAND &: ASSOCIATES under the terms of tliis Agreement. 7. STANDARDS That JOHN BOLAND &: ASSOCIATES, its agents, servants, or em- ployees shaH comply with aH applicable State and Federal statutes and regulations including but not limited to, the Provisions of Minn. Stat. lOA.03-10A.05. 8. CONFLICT OF INTEREST That during the term of this Agreement, John Boland &: Associates should not engage in any employment which would directly conflict with the goals of the city of Chanhassen or would materiaHy interfere with John Boland &: Associates' ability to perform its obligations under this Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have signed this Agreement on the day of 1986. JOHN BOLAND &: ASSOCIATES CITY OF CHANHASSEN By by Ii . ...____ .H__ .. J SHOREWOOD MEMO: DATE: 6/18/86 TO: Mayor and Councilmembers FROM: Dan Vogt :I:tj'f Councilmember Haugen has suggested the pos- sibility of creating a Shorewood Lapel Pin. Sue Niccum has done some checking on prices. Her findings are attached. Member Haugen has requested that this item be placed on the agenda for your consideration. Ie:< ~~A~~~~A:A~~~~A~~AAAAAAAAA~AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA~AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA BUSINESS INFO SIZE 00. AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA Net-JE - NO DYE CHARGE 6/8 W<S WENDaLS 2424 E. FRAN<LIN AVE 3/4"-7/8" 150 500 1em 3cm PRICE $ 1.70 1.18 .~ .75 EXTRA CHARGES DaIVERY JIM 333-6431 AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA MIDWEST BADGE AND NOva TV INC 4420 EXCaSIOR BLVD 927-9901 AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA 3/4" 500 1em ACCENT PROMOTIONS 2815 E. LAKE STREET ARCllJIID 1" 250 500 1em 5em JERRY 721-6301 1.75/1.80 1.65 1.45 .81 .77 .68 $75. Toa...ING CUSTOM SHAPE $125. 4 WKS PREPARATION CHG. $25. 1 COLOR ON GOLD, SILVER OR WHITE I @ ADDITIONAL COLOR $25. AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA ART ENGRAVING SERVICE 3/4" 150 1.95 DYE $C{) FOR LP TO 8 3659 CEDAR AVE SO 250 1.45 COLORS 500 1.35 ROLLIE 1em 1.30 721-6166 2000 1.20 3cm 1.15 AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA JOLLY TYME FAVORS 3/4"-7/8" SO-1~ 1.55 3/4" SETLP $35. 7/8 WKS 913 PAYNE AVE, ST. PALL 200-500 1.27 7/8" SETLP $45. SOO-1 em 1.17 GREG 1000-2500 1.07 776-9692 2500-5em .92 MERIT BADGE CO. 3001 STINSON BLVD. 3/4" 100 1em AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA $50. DYE CHARGE INCUJDES 3 CCLORS (MADE CUT OF CCllJIITRY) JANE 781-7004 1.20 .62 DIDN'T SEEM TOO DEFINATE ON PRICING AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA ROBERT G. KalEY 7/8"-1" . 90 to 1.00 2 COLORS INCLUDED I@ 6/7 WKS 6513 BEARD AVE N BETTER PRICE ADDITIONAL CCLOR $.05 AFTER 1em FOR EACH Ca...OR ON 4:30 - 6:00 EACH PIECE 561-3295 OR 535-8500 AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA BARTON DESIGN 2000 E. ORANGE AVE ST. PALL 250 500 1em 3cm JERRY BARTON 293-0316 OR 774-1736 .75 .55 .50 .43 PRICE INCLUDES ALL CCLOR, DYE CHARGES AND SHIPPING RECOGNITION EXPRESS P.O. BOX 19118 3/4" AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA 8 WKS 250 1em 2000 DICK SANDERS 2.80 2.60 2.00 CLOSIf>l'JE 3 CCLORS @ ADDITIONAL COLOR PER PIECE AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA SEVERAl.. OTHER ClJIPANIES WERE CALLED BUT EITHER NO ANSWER AFTER BEING CALLED SEVERAL TIMES OR DIDN'T RETURN CALL 1986 .1 i ) at ~ ~ + , ., .. , )0) t~ .- 3 ex;> . \\ ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 53 Regulating the Use of Vehicles and of Highways W:ithin the Village- -of Shorewood Incorporating Provisions of the State Highway ~raffic Regulation Act by Reference and Imposing a Penalty for Violation Thereof. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: SECTION 1. Section 2 entitled "No Parking and Limited Parking Zones" is hereby amended to read as follows: "Section 2: No parking, Limited Parking, and Parking by Permit Only Zones." The City Council may, from time to time, by motion or resolution designate portions of the highways and streets, within the City of Shorewood as no parking zones, limited parking zones, or parking by permit only zones and shall cause such ~ones to be marked by appropriate signs. The location of such signs restricting parking shall be prima facia evidence that the City Council has by proper resolution or motion authorized the establishment of such no parking, limited parking, or parking by permit only zones. The City Clerk is hereby authorized to issue permits to residents for parking in zones marked "Parking by Permit Only" upon such terms and condi tions as the City Council. may determine from time to time, by motion or resolution. SECTION 2: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage and publication. this ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Shorewood day of , 1986. Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk ( S .:1:.. f~~~~ ~ 'O~~;JQ~ (') ~~2.V11l $ 09ll' ~ '8 ~ ?. (7 -= -4 ~ 0 U1 g U\~WN:- . . . . c UJ Q o o .... ~ ua 8 , ~ - o a. .N ( (') o z. (J) - ~ 10 .. ~ rs; 6 I S ~n ('0 iOn ~ +-+ 2 :r~ (1'\ >:I ~m ~ (11Z: ~ ~~ o ~~ "' 0 ~ tJ) 6 ~ bA~ ~~ (J1 ~ (t, ~ Ul(/) -::r ~~ t:) Dc ~ o~ (e) l fVJ r"-o V\ )> >~ ~c. o z. ~_~~fM ~, ra - x ;lO:m -4 .JJQ)OtDm o~()<:z. R\ <'0 I;; ~~~ ~> ~~ r-' (Tl~ ~ - ('~ 00 ti\ S co , , I I OOCON~ ...~ ... , ... ~ ~asG16' >~62t F~"'- U)if)~z. thli) >O)~ ~rn ~5 ~ G\(:'\ ~ ~ C7~ (l\o (ll ~ ]>~ ~ (J) ~~ ~ ~ ~ tJ) ffi ... 0 t':!-~ }\ m , ~ c 0 .... j to C .S: 6.~ ~~ ~ ~E ! . ~ - iC. -l _ ]:r. t: ~ ~ ~ 'J ~ J1 V\ - m ?:.j J>~ ~~ m_ >"'7 ~ tT V\ -; - ~ ~ nr4- r'''''~...f~~.~,G)>IOC~(J) x~ o )) c~ V\ - C'\2.. {;\ 00 ( ). &' - ~ ~ ... -0 o Z. Q ( :r ~ o 70 ) ~ > o - SAlE.LUTE - 68" H-I~H 4-41' WIDE 44-" l.1)~C1 MAAJOR. PARK. WARMJ~~ HoUSE/ PA-\lIUON ~ SlJt\6EsreD LEA\J'N~ 4'1 ON 6AC.H' SIDE. " '''~\:,~\~ I\LSO FLAT r ra I~OtJS ~ . ,.Hal ANGlE I R.otJ 8Ae.. .0 K.a!P' f=eoM STeAuNG O~ "P"tN.G. o\lee.. (PREFEMBu.I ~80\lE OOO~-'.) booR '--- -', '- .. CITY OF SHOREWOOD PARK COMMISSION MEETING MONDAY, JUNE 16, 1986 COUNCIL CHAMBERS 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD 7:00 PM M I N U TE S 'CALL TO ORDER Chairman Schmid called the meeting to order at 7:11 PM. ROLL CALL Present: Chairman Schmid, Commissioners Lindstrom, Jakel, Vogel and Laberee; and Deputy Clerk Niccum Absent: Commissioner Jurgens WARMING HOUSE/PAVILION Chairman Schmid reviewed the information provided to the Commission in their packets regarding the approximate cost of $4950 received from Pete Studer. The above amount was for: a 20' x 20' block building with a wall separating a 4' utility area from the main area and a 25' x 30' slab; 48" footings; 12" blocks below grade; 8" blocks above grade; and 8' walls. The extending apron slab will be tied into 12" block at grade level. Two plans were studied, A. and B.; plan A runs north and south and plan B is at an angle. Vogel moved, Jakel seconded, to accept plan A as a conceptual building plan. Motion carried unanimously. Commissioner Lindstrom feels there should be two exits in the building, with one door close to the satellite for the convenience of skaters. The pavilion posts were discussed and steel posts were preferred over wood posts due to prevention of vandalism. The Commission also discussed the roof, and felt a hip roof would be better than a gable roof because of overhang on all sides. They also discussed windows and will discuss the issue more at a later date. Staff reported that Planner Nielsen has said that if the warming house is built next to the pond, soil borings will be necessary. He also said if a lot of fill is needed, a grading plan will be necessary, along with a fill permit. VOLLEYBALL COURT The Commission discussed placement of the volleyball court. They decided to put it in Manor Park because it is primarily a family park. It would be built parallel to the warming house/pavilion and east of it. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Lindstrom moved, Jakel seconded, to approve the minutes of June 2, 1986, as written. Motion carried unanimously. . .. PARK COMMISSION MINUTES MONDAY, JUNE 16, 1986 'page two VOLLEYBALL COURT - continued Commission wishes to know if Public Works Director Zdrazil could have Public Works dig out a 36' x 60' volleyball court 5" deep. The warming house would be built first and the dirt from the court would be used around the warming house. Also what would the charge be to the Park Commission? Commissioner Jakel checked on pricing and came up with the following information: 53 Tons of concrete sand 5" deep Volleyball net Posts and concrete Labor $283. (Mueller Sand and Gravel) 120. 200. ? Jakel moved, Laberee seconded, to recommend to Council that a volleyball court be built in Manor Park adjacent to the proposed warming house, a minimum of 15' away from it, at a cost not to exceed $900. Motion carried unanimously. Commissioners Lindstrom and Jakel will stake out the warming house/pavilion and the volleyball court within a week and request that Planner Nielsen take a look at it to see if it meets with his qpproval. TENNIS BACKBOARDS The Commission discussed the backboards again and felt that a 1" x 10" on the bottom, with 6 sheets of marine plywood and 7 16' 4" x 4"s, with the plywood screwed into the posts with sheet rock screws (using a gun) would work out fine. They asked staff to ask Administrator Vogt to put it on the consent agenda. FILL - HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Staff reported that a letter had been received from Patrick B. Murphy of Hennepin County offering clean fill. 8:17 Commissioner Jakel left to attend another meeting. FINANCE There is $ 24,200 in the Park Capital Improvement Fund through May 31, 1986. SNOWMOBILE ORDINANCE The next meeting, July 7, 1986 will be a very short meeting .....the Commission will then go into a study session to look over ordinances from other cities and begin drafting a new ordinance. FOOTBALL FIELD The Commission delayed discussion of the football field until the last item in hopes that Commissioner Jurgens would make it to the meeting to report on the progress. The Park Commission has looked at the dirt on the field and it is the consensus of the Park Commission that the dirt is not good, it is a fairly heavy clay loam, and full of debris. Their main concern is whether anything will grow. ADJOURNMENT Jakel moved, Vogel seconded, to adjourn at 8:50 PM. Motion carried unanimously. T)T~,...n_T:"ru'''T.''"!'T T V ,...nTIV1"T"T'pn c.,,,,,, ~l... r-r-,,", SHOREWOOD MEMO: \~L--S .~(.~ DATE: TO: ~~. y~ ./c.-L-,L~ c L- /'--' ,;2 S () rtJ-zJ ~ ...5 !J () - FROM: /sf- ------ ~ /1 aV c2u. ;l~ .gS, 0.0 r ~ ~.~..t;J Y71(- /f'S/ ~ //:5~2V '-,<C.,.....'~ d ~ /..3fl '-!.) tc/'- d {///.;J. >( 31/z.) ~ a:U~ . d cAf. /otJo - / J'2 ~C/ cd f /I ') / / .........t:.A:':' ,-,~,.e~' tY-&L--' ~J ',"", (- c.(.' '-.).) , c'-':-..,<-"'- /~.;7 /f~."/l <'. ~-'7<.-(... /.... C,.'L_,-<.' I ("rLjC/2-~)'. //7) cJ' cr c /--,.J c;/!.~'L;L./ ? / l..,"-/'. .".. '- .;.C.iL_': C'l.,./ If' i( ~~~'c( c ~ , . ~ZC f,2.d<., L:C.~ l}1<-,c /2<-", ~.~ ~ d/tLck /' SHOREWOOD MEMO: ~L~ ~..ZJ DATE: TO: 0~G ~~ FROM: 530- 0 tJ..3 / ~,~ CA. tJ-~ & r:! c.cf. - L~ ~. c..A!-. a ~ \.,-<" .;;.,' 4-u d~ c;o~L~d lj~~> June 18, 1986 City of Shorewood 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, MN 55331 Re: Louis and Colleen Bellamy 5795 Covington Road Shorewood, MN 55331 Dear Sir or Madam: We reside at 5795 Covington Road, Shorewood, Minnesota. We presently own our own well and septic tank. We would like to be served by municipal sewer and water, which is now being installed. Please let us know where and when the hook-up can be accomplished. Very truly yours, ~~ cc: Paul A. Skjervold ...... '..\ . ,~ A- ... _'2. '/.. , - ~ '..,. :;; . an..;. .'" ~ I/> ~ I r ~ " , , " ' ..9 " .n ' ' /.... .:z: ~ : ' ',', ,-'. ..... Q dJ .' ,.. : . ~ dJ '..: ",1:./. '.... r. ~; f t /' / .. , / / II " ~::.t. eo:'... f....\ ~:) ~ :.,-:~ :. ~..;. (~:: ('.:! ......\ ......; ~ ... / // ......... / ....... .~:;.:\ ::. ! (:)0 ~CJ~ CJ~ /" // " ' ~ ....~ .' -.~ '.~' . mhO ... lS plat of vi the City C ILD DUCK SF'CO held th' ouneil of Sho . ND 18 rewood day of '...1 : , \ 11Ft" . ~,-1,8q -- 14-- 2: ., J:' lCl ~ <4' Iii . IS"":- 'm a- ll> "- I ~ " , , ~ ",', , ' (, . (f" . .' , ,'0""'" "..... ':'" dJ ciJ < ' , , ,~ '., --:- rJJ ' \.,: ' /' // // ,I 0' j ";~::. \':..'\ c .:.-;. () :"'.'j <a- ... ..\.,:" , ; ...... .....; '. :,,,:' ! ,:>0 ~CJ~ CJ~ / /' ,/ ! ". ~ mh' ... 15 plat the C it of WILD DUG held thl Council of S~ SECOND s orewood day of .' ~ ".~