The URL can be used to link to this page

062485 CC Reg AgP . ~ . ... . . CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MONDAY, JUNE 24, 1985 COUNCIL CHANBERS 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD 7:30 P.M. AGE N D A CALL TO ORDER A. Pledge of Allegiance and Prayer B. Roll Call Haugen j Shaw ~ Stover ~. . Gagne Rascop \ ~\) 1\' Mayor 1. PRESENTATION ~ JUDGE GARY. LARSON 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES \ A. Regular Council Meeting - June 10, 1985 (Attachment #la. - Minutes) MATTERS. FROM. THE .. FLOOR ". {J-pp;<. A. C---IJJ ~-Y ~... ~~c.r~"- ~L..LC~.<..A. ~..~ ~ /-i.&~A, ~ B. U 4. PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT A. B. 5. FINANCE COMMITTEE REPORT ~ Steve Frazier A. B. 6. PARK COMMISSION REPORT A. B. ~ , ~ REGULAR COUNCIL AGENDA - 2 - JUNE 24, 1985 7:45 7. PUBLIC HEARING- P.U.D.- CONCEPT STAGE A. Applicant: Gideon's Orchard Location: 5620 County Road 19 (Attachment 7a. - 1983 Staff Report) (Attachment 7b. - 1985 Staff Report) 8. SIMPLE SUBDIVISION REQUEST (Continuation) A. Applicant: Nygaard/Holmberg Location: 5955 Cajed and 27055 Smithtown Road (Refer to 6/10 Packet - #9a.) ..:~ 9. PETITITON FOR-STOP SIGN A. Location: St Albans Bay Road and Manor Road (Attachment #9a. - Petition) --- ~ ~~......, / ("'" '" " . '\ 10~ PLANNER~S-REPORT \~__) ~ Interum Zoning Ordinance Summary B. 11. SIMPLE SUBDIVISION REQUEST A. Applicant: R. W. Reutiman Location: Lot north of 24000 State Highway 7 on Lake Linden Drive (Attachment lla. - Staff Report) (Attachment llb. - Engineer's Review) 12. ATTORNEY'S REPORT A. Solicitation Ordinance (Attachment l2a. - Ordinance Draft) B. , ~ . ( REGULAR COUNCIL AGENDA - 3 - JUNE 24, 1985 13. ENGINEER'S REPORT A. Change Order #1 Project #84-2 Valley Paving (Attachment 13a. - Change Order #1) B. Change Order #4 - Project #84-5 Kenko Inc. C. (Attachment 13b. - Change ORder #4) Request for Payment - Kenko Inc. Payment Voucher #4 (Attachment 13c. - ,Payment Voucher #4) Cathcart Area - Storm Sewer Project Update D. 14. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS A. Appointment of Ramona Emmer and Martey Jakel to the West Human Services Board B. 15. MAYOR'S REPORT A. B. 16. COUNCIL REPORTS A. B. 17. APPROVAL OF CLAIMS AND ADJOURNMENT , .' ~" . ,.. .....~'t<...." , ... '". .-,.,' "f., ,. . ",t ",;',.lJ,.,;," ,~....... . , "~'~f'1". "'" .....4~li...'" . lr" CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MONDAY, JUNE 10; 1985 . COUNCIL CHAMBERS 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD 7:30 P.M. M I NUT E S CALL TO ORDER The regular meeting of the Shorewood City Council was called to order by Mayor Rascop at 7:30 P.M., Monday, June 10, 1985,' in the Council Chambers. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE AND PRAYER Mayor Rascop opened the meeting with the Pledge of Allegiance and a prayer. ROLL CALL Present: Councilmembers - Mayor Rascop, Haugen, Shaw, Stover, and Gagne. Staff: Attorney Froberg, Engineer Norton, Planner Nielsen, Administrator Vogt, and Clerk Kennelly. APPROVAL OF MINUTES SPECIAL MEETING - May 20, 1985 Haugen moved, seconded by Gagne, to approve the minutes of the Special Meeting of Monday, May 20, 1985 as written. Motion carried - 5 Ayes. BOARD OF REVIEW MEETING - May 23, 1985 Shaw moved, seconded by Haugen, to approve the minutes of the Board of Review Meeting of Thursday, May 23, 1985 as written. Motion carried unanimously - 5 Ayes. REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING May 28, 1985 Haugen moved, seconded by Shaw, to approve the minutes of the Regular Council Meeting of Tuesday, May 28, 1985 as written. Motion carried, 5 Ayes. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR REQUEST FOR SWIMMING POOL - 5490 Valleywood Circle Carol Bauman of Valleywood Circle was present to request permission to install a swimming poo~ that meets all setbacks according to the zoning district at the above address. She also agrees to fence in the pool in accordance with the Fence Ordinance. Shaw moved, seconded by Gagne, to approve the request as submitted. Motion carried - 5 Ayes. / . . REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING - 2- JUNE 10, 1985 GARDEN PATCH C.U.P.- Charles Crepeau ,RESOLUTION NO. 40~85 Charles Crepeau, owner of the building at 23425 Smithtown Road that houses the "Garden Patch" business, has been informed that the Conditional Use Permit issued to operate the Garden Patch will expire June 9, 1985, and that the current uses are in viola- tion of the C.U.P. as it was issued. Mr. Crepeau was present to request an extension of time in order to apply for rezoning and obtain a needed survey. Haugenasked if a time extension would also cover the uses not listed in the C.U.P. Attorney Froberg felt a 30 to 60 day extension was feas- ible. Some of the current uses will not be allowable uses under the zoning but can be allowed by C.U.P. Shaw moved, seconded by Stover, to extend the C. U. P. for 30 days. Motion carried - 4 Ayes, 1 Abstain (Haugen), by roll call vote. REQUEST FOR SIMPLE-SUBDIVISION - LAKE LINDEN DRIVE Joe Gorecki presented a request for a simple subdivision of the property north of the Sullivan Center, located at 24000 State Highway 7. Nielsen indicated that a grading plan was recently submitted and the Engineer has not had a chance to review it yet. Rascop would like to review the staff report and the Engineer's recommendation on the grading plan. Council tabled action until the staff report can be obtained. PUBLIC HEARING - SETBACK VARIANCE l(enneth Koester Mr. Koester of 24825 Amlee Road was present to request a variance to allow the placement of a garage 10' from the rear property line. Mayor Rascop opened the Public Hearing at 7:52 P.M. Council discussed with Mr. Koester the possibility of a relocation that would preserve the trees and the kitchen window, as were expressed concerns of the applicant. Gagne indicated that Mr. Koester has obtained signatures of adjoining property owners approving the location of the structure. After calling for public comments and receiving none, Mayor Rascop closed the hearing at 8:21 P.M. Gagne moved to allow a variance as requested, seconded by Haugen for discussion. Shaw felt there was a better solution and requested that the motion be withdrawn. Shaw moved, seconded by Stover, to table the variance request. Motion carried - 4 Ayes, 1 Abstain (Gagne). . ... REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING - 3 - JUNE 10, 1985 '\ PUBLIC HEARING-:-VARIANCE TO.EXPAND.A NONCONFORMING-STRUCTURE~-Roger Zaun RESOLUTION-NO. 41~85 Mayor Rascop opened the Public Hearing at 8:16 P.M. to hear a re- quest by RobertZaun of 5815 Ridge Road to expand a nonconforming structure. The existing structure. does not meet the road setback but the expansion does not increase the nonconformity. After call- ing for public comments and receiving none, the Mayor closed the Public Hearing at 8:18 P.M. Haugen moved, seconded by Gagne, to approve the variance to expand a nonconforming structure. The variance was granted by roll call vote, 5 Ayes. PUBLIC HEARING.--VARIANCE-TO.EXPAND.A NONCONFORMING - STRUCTURE .". - Marvin.. Boote RESOLUTION NO..42.".85 Mayor Rascop opened the Public Hearing at 8:20 P.M. by hearing a request from Jim McKinnon, representing Marvin Boote, in his vari- ance request to expand an existing nonconforming structure. This request does not expand the nonconformity. Rascop closed the Public Hearing at 8:21 P.M. after calling for public comments and receiv- ing none. } Stover moved, seconded by Gagne, to approve the variance as requested. Motion carried by 5 Ayes, by roll call vote. SIMPLR SUBDIVISION REQUEST-.".-P~te~Holmberg Peter Holmberg would like to be granted a Simple Subdivision to divide and combine to realign the lot line of the properties located at 5955 Cajed Lane and 27055 Smithtown Road. He would like an ex- tension of 5 months on his request because the property located at 27055 Smithtown. Road is in probate at this time. Attorney Froberg indicated that. the division request would have to be made by the representative of the estate and Mr. Holmberg. Haugen moved, seconded by Gagne, to table until the next meeting for the purpose of clarification of the application. PARK,COMMISSION.REPORT Martey Jakel indicated that the Park Commission did not have a quor~' but they did discuss the temporary installation of ' posts at the ManQ~;' Ball field until the fenc~s can be installed. The posts would be to's, prevent vehic les from dri,Jing on the fie ld . >.i The Commission would like, the Engineer to study the water ptoblem a~ the new Waterford area par~. land. Rascop moved, seconded:~ Haugen to authorize Engineer to d'),'. a drain_ge study for the pro~~d park:" expense. to come from the Park Fund.- ,-..-., ., . REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING - 4 - JUNE 10, 1985 PARK COMMISSION REPORT. (Continued) Jakel is in the process of painting the Cathcart Park building and equipment with volunteer help from the neighborhood youths. The Council expressed their appreciation to the volunteers for their time given. PLANNING COMMISSION. REPORT The Planning Commission minutes are in this packet with the recom- mendations they made on issues that will be handled during this meeting. Stover reported that Mary Boyd has resigned from the Planning Commi- sion. Stover would like a notice placed in the local paper inform- ing the residents of the vacancy on the Commission. SIGN PERMIT ~ I.C.O. Tom Wilharm of the I.C.O., located at 5680 County Road 19, presented a request for signage. Attorney Froberg stated that this request does not comply with the present ordinance and it cannot be consid- ered under the new ordinance until it has been published in the offi- cial city newspaper. He indicated that he could also request a vari- ance requiring a public hearing if he chooses not to wait for the ordinance publication. Haugen moved, seconded by Shaw, to table Mr. Wilharm's request to the Council Me~~ July 8th. WESTLAWN II -~ PLAT APPROVAL RESOLUTION NO. 43-85 George Larson of 26405 Smithtown Road was present to ask for Final Plat Approval for his subdivision, Westlawn II. The subdivision has met the requirements of the Planner and the City. Attorney Froberg has requested that Mr. Larson submit a "title opinion" to him for review. Shaw moved, seconded by Gagne, to approve the final plat subject to approval of the "title opinion" and any and all fees and assessments due the City. Final plat was approved by a roll call vote - 5 Ayes. PUBLIC.HEARING ~ VARIANCE TO EXPAND A NONCONFORMING STRUCTURE - 20940 Ivy Lane RESOLUTION NO. 44-85 A request to expand a nonconforming use was made by Scott Tompkins of 20940 Ivy Lane. The Public Hearing was opened by Mayor Rascop at 8:45 P.M. project. Attorney Froberg reviewed the steps that Trivesco agreed to prior to the City requesting the temporary water service for that proj~ct; the development contract, preliminary platting, and water franch1se agree- ment. Mr. Pflaum does not feel these agreements are pertinent at this time. He would like to make changes in his plat and needs to know if the water service can be obtained in order to determine his final platt- ing, Pflaum has done a feasibility study to determine that Minnetonka's water system is adequate to service the 90 connections he is requesting. Shaw had concerns that Minnetonka may table, the Trivesco request if a second request is received at this time. . . . REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING - 6 - JUNE 10, 1985 NEAR MOUNTAIN ADDITION REQUEST (Continued) Haugen questioned the possibility of him going together with Trivesco for a joint well for both projects. Pflaum wants a separate system in order to maintain control of his own system. Shaw moved, seconded by Haugen, to direct the Administrator to request Minnetonka for temporary water service for 90 units or four (4) years service whichever comes first. Motion carried - 5 Ayes. KENNEL LICENSE REQUEST - Jane Kline Ms. Kline came to the Council requesting a Kennel license for her 6 or 7 dogs. She plans to purchase the property located at 5990 Straw- berry Lane and plans to install a large fenced in area to keep her dogs. Attorney Froberg felt the current ordinance does not allow for non "show dogs" as she is requesting. Stover questioned the possibility of granting a variance or possible ordinance change to grant her request. Gagne moved, seconded by Shaw, to deny the request. Motion carried 4 Ayes, 1 Naye (Stover). Stover would like to see some alternatives to the present ordinance reviewed. PLANNERS REPORT COVINGTON VINE RIDGE EXTENSION OF P.U.D. A request has been made for a six month extension for their P.U.D. rezoning. The project has been sold and some changes may be made, but they intend to proceed with the project. Haugen moved, seconded by Gagne, to approve the six month extension. Motion carried - 4 Ayes - 1 Abstain (Stover). SHOREWOOD OAKS - EXTENSION OF PRELUlINARY PLAT A request to extend the filing for preliminary plat approval for six months has been made. The project plan is progressing but an extension of time is needed. Haugen moved, seconded by Gagne, to approve a six month extension. Request approved - 4 Ayes, 1 abstain (Stover). JUNK COMPLAINT UPDATE Planner Nielsen and a Police officer will be inspecting the Blood property again this week on ordinance violations. Minnetonka Yacht Club has cleaned up their violation. The Glen Road complaint has also begun cleaning up their property. . . REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING - 7 - JUNE 10, 1985 ATTORNEY'S REPORT FINDINGS OF FACTS - SHOREWOOD YACHT CLUB On request from the Council, Attorney Froberg reviewed the back- ground and the court decision granting the right to operate the Shorewood Yacht Club. Haugen questioned what rights the court granted the Yacht Club. Froberg felt that if changes were made that were listed in the C.U.P., that the Council would have the chance to review. Rascop also referred to the contract signed with the new owners, Snug Harbor, listing all their conditions for that operation. ENGINEER'S REPORT CATHCART AREA STREET AND STORM SEWER PROJECT Engineer Norton submitted variations in construction types and costs for road improvements and installation of storm sewer for the Cathcart area. Council asked him to clarify the various types of construction methods and the longevity of each type of construction. Council would like to see additional information on benefited areas and cost to those residences. It has also been suggested by the Public Works Director that a ten (10) year Capitol Improvement Project be implemented beginning with the 1986 budget. Staff will return with suggested ways of assessing this project to determine the feasibility of the improvement. WATERFORD PROJECT 84-5 - CHANGE ORDER #3 Engineer Norton explained the various changes in the contract plans and recommended approval of change order #3. Haugen moved, seconded by Gagne, to approve tbe change order as submitted. Motion carried - 4 Ayes (Stover temporarily absent). SEAL COATING COST ESTIMATE Engineer Norton submitted a list of roads recommended for seal coating this year in the total amount of $54,700. Council dis- cussed using the $66,000. surplus in the 1984 budget, recommended by the auditor, to be placed in a contingency fund. Gagne moved, seconded by Rascop, to authorize the Engineer to draw up specifications and advertise for bids. Motion carried - 5 Ayes. . . REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING - 8 - JUNE 10, 1985 ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT PHOENIX GARDENS - WINE/SUNDAY AND 3.2 SALE RESOLUTION NO. 37-85 Shaw moved, seconded by Gagne, to grant Phoenix Gardens a Wine, Sunday Sale and Non-intoxicating Malt Liquor License subject to approval of insurance coverages. Motion carried by roll call vote - 5 Ayes. REFUSE COLLECTION PROPOSALS Council reviewed the five (5) alternative suggestions for types of removal. Rascop added #6 - "Post all roads to a 4 ton limit". After discussion of the alternatives, the general concensus was to direct the Administrator and Attorney to draft an ordinance reflecting the procedures in alternative #2. FRANCHISE DISCUSSION MEETING AT MINNETONKA Council directed City Attorney Froberg to attend the Minnetonka City Council where they will be discussing the Water Franchise Agreement with Trivesco of June 24, 1985. BUDGET AMENDMENT Stover moved, seconded by Gagne, to amend the Budget to transfer $16,482. from the Council contingency fund to the Public Works budget to cover increased wages, on-call expenses, overtime, and wage increase for Assistant Public Works Director. Motion carried - 5 Ayes. REQUEST TO CLEAR FIRE LANE A request has been received from William Dixon to clear the Grant Lorenz Road "fire lane" for summer use. Council denies the request until the "fire lane ordinance" is in tact. The City crew will be directed to clean up the junk and diseased trees on that property. REQUEST TO CLOSE CITY OFFICE - JULY 5 Council denied the request to close the city office on July 5th, to be used as an employee vacation day. MAYOR'S REPORT POLICE FORMULA MEETING A request has been made for two representatives from Excelsior and Shorewood to get together to discuss a new police formula for the new contract. Haugen and Shaw volunteered but feel that once the meeting date is set that there should be representatives from Tonka Bay and Greenwood asked to attend. . . REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING - 9 - JUNE 10, 1985 MAYOR'S REPORT (Continued) PLANNING COMMISSION RESIGNATION - MARY BOYD Mary Boyd has submitted her resignation from the Planning Commi- sion effective July 2, 1985. She will be moving out of town. POLICE CONTRACTS Rascop reported that the Police Contracts are ready to be settled and that an agreement year contract. has be~ Sargeant Hodgdon for a two COUNCIL REPORT CABLE COMMISSION A part-time (20 hour week) has been hired to administrate the Cable Commission at a rate of $10,000. a year. CHECK ZONING VIOLATION Council directed the Planner to check on possible zoning violation at the Skipperette. APPROVAL OF CLAIMS AND ADJOURNMENT Gagne moved, seconded by Shaw, to adjourn the Regular Council Meeting of June 10, 1985 at 11:35 P.M., subject to approval of claims for payment. Motion carried - 5 Ayes. General Fund - Acct #00166-02 Liquor Fund - Acct #00174 Checks 30567-30634 " 3468- 3517 $375,610.23 50,393.30 Respectfully submitted, Sandra L. Kennelly City Clerk Mayor Rascop " CHECK NO. 30567 30568 30569 30570 30571 30572 30573 30574 30575 30576 30577 30578 30579 30580 30581 30582 30583 30584 30585 30586 30587 30588 30589 30590 30591 30592 30593 30594 30595 30596 30597 30598 30599 30600 30601 30602 30603 30604 30605 30606 30607 30608 30609 30610 30611 30612 30613 30614 30615 GENERA~UND - BILLS PAID SINCE JUNE 104lt985 TO WHOM PAID PURPOSE AMOUNT 867.94 509.79 651.41 672.44 455.19 702.55 177 . 11 651.41 518.52 601.64 -0- 601.66 875.46 802.13 205.22 54.96 10.00 150.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 45.76 1,730.06 1,641.00 870.00 1,012.27 625.48 35.00 383 . 17 1,359.32 44.00 5.84 24.00 31.50 140.00 7,438.00 133.00 16.29 80.00 164.67 332.00 346.86 29 . 11 235.81 3,625.00 798.58 68.95 147.72 Ev Beck Roberta Dybvik Dennis Johnson Sandra Kennelly Susan Niccum Brad Nielsen Salary " " " " " " " Payroll change Salary " Dan Randall Patricia Ray Howard Stark " Ralph Wehle Don Zdrazil Dan Vogt " t1 VOID Salary " " Payroll change Union Dues Stark, Credit Union Dep. Mayor Salary Council Salary II " ASCME Local 224 City-Co. Credit Union Robert Rascop Bob Gagne Tad Shaw Kristi Stover Jan Haugen Roberta Dybvik State Treasurer Minnetonka STate Bank Commissioner of Revenue STate Treasurer Asplund Custom Homes Acro Minn. AmeriData Systems Associated Asphalt B&B Seat Cover Bacon Drug Budget Paper Mary Dalton Dale Green Co Froberg & Penberthy PA Gopher Sign Co. Hance Hardware ICMA Leef Bros League of Minn Cities Midwest Asphalt Minnegasco Wm Mueller & Sons Munitech Inc. NSP Pepsi Cola Co Satellite Ind. " " tt tt Mileage, April & May June 7 payroll-FICA " "" -FWH " "" -SWH " "" -PERA Refund Build. Permit overpay Office supplies Computer training/equip. Road mix Equip. maint. Office supplies Coffee Clean City Hall Dirt for parks General & Trivesco Legal fees Road signs Crescent Beach repair Membership dues Laundry service Share of LMC Bldg Stockpile Amesbury well utilities Road mix Sewer/Water System maint City electricity Refill Pop machine Satelite services continued, next page . CHECK NO. 30616 30617 30618 30619 30620 30621 30622 30623 30624 30625 30626 30627 30628 30629 30630 30631 30632 30633 30634 . TO WHOM PAID Sel-Mor Dist. Suburban Tire Tonka Auto & Body Tonka Printing Cragun's Conf. Ctr U of M Water Products Co Warner Hardware Weekly News Inc Louisville Landfill American Nat'l Bank Norwest Bank Mpls. Norwest Bank Mpls. Matthias, Roebke & Maiser Astleford Internat'l First Security Title Dave Johnson & Assoc Commissioner of Revenue 4IPneral Fund, page two PURPOSE AMOUNT Copy machine supplies Equip maint Shop supplies Stationery supply Deposit- Hotel Res. Minn. Mun. Clerk Inst. Water meter purchase Paint supplies - Cathcart Legal Notice publication Refuse haul VOID Fund 53 Principal & Interest Fund 54 Interest Fund 56 Principal & Interest Audit, UtI Bill, Stmts, etc 1975 IHC Truck w/tank Refund Assess payoff (error) Refund Build permit overpay May 1985 Fuel Tax 260.06 223.80 12.03 72 .00 40.00 95.00 664.87 27.15 82.01 22.50 -0- 6,004.00 14,799.00 304,125.30 11,892.40 5,500.00 1,294.33 100.00 124.95 TOTAL 375,610.22 '" CHECK NO. 3468 3469 3470 3471 3472 3473 3474 3475 3476 3477 3478 3479 3480 3481 3482 3483 3484 3485 3486 3487 3488 3489 3490 3491 3492 3493 3494 3495 3496 3497 3498 3499 3500 3501 3502 3503 3504 3505 3506 3507 3508 3509 3510 3511 3512 3513 3514 3515 3516 3517 LIQ. FUND - BILLS PAID SINCE JUNE . 1985 TO WHOM PAID Susan Culver Russell Marron Bob Nash Don Tharalson Stephen Thies John Josephson Bill Josephson Susan Latterner Steve Maeger Chris Meyer Stewart Peterson Dean Young Russell Marron State Treasurer Mtka State Bank Commissioner of Revenue State Treasurer City of Shorewood NSP Minnegasco Jude Candy/Tobacco Pepsi Cola Co Pogreba Dist. East Side Bev. Northstar Ice Thorpe Dist. Quality Wine Griggs. Cooper & Co Intercontinental Pack Co Mark VII Dist. Day Dist. Royal Crown Bev Prior Wine Co Johnson Bros Twin City Wine Matthias. Roebke & Maiser Service Sales Corp Minnesota Bar Supply Minn. Suburban News Ed Phillips & Sons Griggs. Cooper & Co Quality Wine Prior Wine Eagle Wine Co Johnson Bros Wholesale Old Dutch Foods Coca-Cola Bottline BellBoy Corp Commissioner of Revenue " " " PURPOSE Salary " " " " " " " " " " " Mileage for May June 7 payroll - FICA " "" -FWH " "" - SWH " "" - PERA Liquor Store Bkkping. May '85 Service 4/24-5/23 Service 4/25-5/24 Tobacco & Misc purchase Pop purchase May beer purchase "" If Misc purchase May beer purchase Liquor & Wine Liquor Wine May beer purohase " " " Pop purchase Wine Wine Wine Fin. Stmts. Meeting. Audit. etc Misc purchase Mise 'purchase Advertise Liquor & Wine Liquor Wine Wine Wine Wine Misc Pop Liquor May Sales Tax Yz of Est. June Sales Tax TOTAL AMOUNT 121. 38 540.81 101.00 163.50 151. 50 178.75 542.14 11 7.00 323.93 163.38 104.13 448.00 20.90 261.52 335.00 166.00 153.01 243.57 320.79 102.17 1.612.62 609.50 5.730.41 4.779.20 343.61 6.189.85 739.04 2.031.07 110.92 3.687.45 1.658.85 64.60 466.59 844.01 373.57 2.700.00 25.32 97.68 287. 14 1.064.65 2.066.37 238.02 62.92 15.48 82.82 77.62 318.15 418.85 6.092.33 3 . 046 . 18 50,393.30 _HOREWOOD ~%NANC. COMM%TTEE %NT_"M REDRT TO: FROM: R.: 8hor.wood City Council Financ. Co..itt.. D.linqu.nt T.x.. .nd Sp.ci.l A.......nt. R.+.r.nc. Cltl.. Comp.rl.on on T.x.. .nd S.rvlc.. R.commendation. This r.port is to ..rv. .. .n int.rm r.port 0+ the Fin.nc. Co.mitt.. to aid the City Council in pl.nning +or the 1986 Budg.t .nd policy d.ci.ion. r.l.ting to city +in.nc... It i. di++icult +or .ny .dvi.ory co..itt.. to g.t to th.bottom line on comparativ. d.t. r.gu.rding +inanc.. within the City 0+ Shor.wood Dr in trying to do a co.par.tiv. analy.i. with other municipal unit.. The di++iculty st.m. +rom the availability 0+ comparabl. data .nd the di++.ring r.porting .nd costing m.thods .mploy.d in di++.ring municipaliti... Howev.r, the Financ. Committ.. doe. +..1 th.t th.r. i. .nough data to warrant the City Council to explore our r.comm.ndations and to conduct +urther inv..tig.tion where it d.... n.c....ry. Also, as we promis.d, w. have op.rat.d .s ind.pend.ntly .s possible +rom d.mand. on city .ta++. The +ir.t portion 0+ the Finance Committ.es r.port deal. with delinquent taxes and .pecial ......ment.. Th. Financ. Committ.. appreciated the Auditor. report to Council dated May 28, 1985 and upon questioning indicat.d that there was .235,000 in del inquest as.essments and 52,000 in back t.x.s. Our goal this year has been to .tudy Special A.ses..ents and Taxe. which .r. delinqu.lt; identi+y the cau.., and make r.co.mendation. to the Council on how to deal with the probl... Tabl. 1 id.nti+i.. the d.linquencies in Special Ass.s...nts and t.x... Kitty Framc.n will pr.sent this r.port and the Financ. Co..itt.... r.commendation.. The s.cond portion 0+ the Financ. Co.mitt.... report a. pr..ent.d by Maria Malooly d.al. with property t.x.. in Shor.wood in relation to re+.r.nc. citi.. h.ving the .... r.lativ. popul.tion 'and si.ilar probl.... T.ble 2 .how. a comp.rison 0+ Shorewood'. t.x rat.. .nd +inancial .xp.nditur.. per capita with the r.+.r.nc. citi.. 0+ D.ephav.n, Wayz.ta, Sav.g., .nd Minn.tri.t.. Table 3 shows a three year co.p.ri.on 0+ city co.ta. Recomm.ndation. dealing with city taxe.l.p.nding conclude the r.port. The Finance Committee .t.nd. r.ady to an.w.r qu..tion. on th.ir +inding. .nd to conduct .ddition.l r....rch by dir.ction 0+ the City Council. --' ~ \'fHEFOLLOWING "fABLE REFj".~CTS TOTAL;I~LINQUENT';fAXES ~ $Pe:C<~AL MENTSDUE AS OF APRIL 30,f9B5. HO"'EVER SHOREt400D'S SHARiE IS PORTION OF THESEAMOUNTS.ND IS DESCRIBED BELOW. : # OF PROP YEARS OWNER I --- --- -- - -- -_._.--.-.-......-.- - - --.-.-',----- ---- - ------ --'- ------.-- . AMOUNT 20 1 1 t - - -- -.- ------ ----....~........-- --- ---:-- ---.--------- - --- -.-:.........-.... , I , I f 82-84 81-84 82-84 81-84 81-84 84 79-84 82-84 81-84 84 82-84 82-84 84 82-84 84 82-84 84 84 259,703.17 39,274.73 19,661.99 15,660.68 14,086.98 9,351.80 9,258.10 9,088.11 8,353.22 8,107.86 8,075.40 7,902.53 7,270.84 6,241.92 6,206.18 5,487.80 5,254.15 5,103.44 BOULDER BRIDGE PAKOSH CREPEAU KOEHNEN RUFFENACH S. OAKS DEV. MCARDLE MEAKINS """ PHIPPS CLAGUE MORGAN ANDERSON COLE WINTEFU' JOHNSON WILLIAMS BUTLEF< TINGEWOOD INC. 2 4 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 44 444,088.90 (84%) 17 (32%) DEBT LESS THAN $5,000 PER OWNER - ALL OTHERS 64 85,930.69 (16%) 40 (68%) I 108 TOTALS ~i30, 019.59 57 .. I X .( ... .. ..Z ZI IE .~. II Z. HI JI Ie A . t'4 . J . e .. THESE FIGURES REFLECT THAT 9% OF THE DELINQUENT TAXPAYERS OWE 66% DF THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF TAXES & SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS DELINQUENT AS OF 4/30/85. ONE TAXPAYER (?) ALONE OWES 49% OF THE TOTAL AMOUNT OUTSTANDING. OF THE TOTAL AMOUNT DUE, $217,688.04 IS DUE TO THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD IN DELINQUENT SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS. OF THE REMAINING $312,331.55, APPROX- IMATELY $56,219.68 (18%) IS DUE TO THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD. THE DELINQUENT SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS ARE BROKEN INTO THESE CATEGORIES - SANITARY SEWER (MAIN SEWER) WATER IMPROVEMENT SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENT DELINQUENT SEWER UTILITY DELINQUENT SEWER UTILITY DISEASED TREE REMOVAL DELINQUENT SEWER UTILITY DELINQUENT SEWER UTILITY DELINQUENT SEWER UTILITV BOULDER BRIDGE IMP. WATER/SEWER DELINQUENT SEWER UTILITY DELINQUENT SEWER UTILITV DFLINlmFNT SFWFf:: IlTTl TTY '. $ 38, 700 . 06 ~. $ 719.42 ... $ 3,154.64- $ 99.57 - $ 14()' 43 .... $ 88.66 .- $ 140.43 - $ 91.08 - $ 515.13 - $ 167,433.5:~ - $ 862.43 ~. $ 2,197.07- ~; ~.545 59 - 1 ("169 1 (/73 1972/1("173 1 ("177 1 ("178 1977 1979 1 98~) 1981 1982 1981 1982 ~9R~ 5:~ PROPERTIES 1 PROPERTY 2 PF<OPERT IES 1 PI:-':OPEFnv 1 pr.WPEFnv 1 PI:-':OPEFnv 1 PF<OPEf<TV 1 PROPEFnv 4 PROPERTIES 14 F'1:-':OF'EFnIES 7 PF<OPERT IES 12 F'F<OF'EFnIES '.:>1 PRnPFF\'TTI="S 4 473-7358 - MARKBERNHARDSENSUGGESTS"\~~A/n ANO~INANCEtiCHLpr.L- LED FOR THAT DESCRIBES HOW,DEVELOPMENTIMPROVEHENTS SHOULD BE FUNDED. 484-3353 - GARY DIXON STATED THAT SHOREVIEW DOESN'THAVE\THE PROBLEM BECAUSE DEVELOPERS ARE REQUIRED TO PAYiALL COSTS UP FRONT. . THERE ARE NO ASSESSMENTS. HE'!SUG- GESTS WE CAN WITHHOLD LICENSES, PERMITS, ETC. UNTIL TAXES/ASSESSMENTS ARE PAIDVP. THE FOLLOWINGcCOMMF;NTS CITY 1$:I>ELItLQUENCY RA-T ARDEN HILLS ( 1 -2% ) EDINA ( 1....2~ ) ORONO (( 3%) SHOREVIEW (3-5%) LEAGUE OF CITIES 227-5600 - PETER TRITZ WILL BE SENDING ~E COPIES OF ORDINANCES ~ AGREEMENTS WHICH REQUIRE IMPROVEMENTS TO BE THE PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY OF~HE DEVELOPER AS WELL AS AGAINST THE LAND. ONCE THIS HAS BEEN DONE, THERE IS RECOURSE ON COLLECTION YOU CAN USE ~OND SECUR- ING, ESCROW, PREPAYING, LETTER OF CREDIT, ETC. IF THERE IS SECURITY, DRAW, IF NOT, SUE. SHORT TERM RECOMMENDATIONS - 1) DETERMINE WHETHER THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT WITH BOULDER BRIDGE FARMS INCLUDES ANY DEVELOPER RESPONSIBILITY. IF THERE IS, USE THE APPROPRIATE COLLECTION PROCEDURE. IF NOT, 2) BRING INFORMAL, CITY COUNCIL PRESSURE TO BEAR, AND/OR 3) PUBLICIZE THE EFFECT ON THE TAX RATE TO THOSE TAXPAYERS WHO ARE PAYING THEIR OBLIGATIONS ON TIME. LONG TERM RECOMMENDATIONS - 1) DRAFT AN ORDINANCE WHICH REQUIRES A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT SIMILAR TO_NE OF THOSE FROM THE LEAGUE OF CITIES, 2) DRAFT AN ORDINANCE WHICH REQUIRES THAT ALL APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS, LICENSES, VARIANCES ETC. BE HELD UNTIL SOME ACTION HAS BEEN TAKEN TO BRING DELINQUENT TAXES ~ SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS INTO ORDER, AND/OR 3) PUBLICIZE THE DELINQUENCIES. . TABLE 2: TAX RATES AND EXPENDZTURES SHORE WOOD DEEP HAVEN WAYZATA SAVAGE MINNETRISTA POP. 4646 3680 3540 5231 3290 ----------------------------------------------------------------- MILLRATE 22.914 85 (24.08) 12.662 16.536 27.977 15.472 RANKING 69 13 40 80 35 ----------------------------------------------------------------- ASSESSED RESI 49,109,357 42,683,404 51,441,633 30,846,489 35,000,106 COM TX BASE TX LEVY 1,125,292 540,457 850,639 836,838 541,522 EXPENDITURES PER CAPITA EXEC., 59.39 FINANCE, GOV SERVS, LEGAL Ie PLN/ZON 23.92 50.36 55.02 29.32 PUBLIC WORKS 103.24 79.72 71.33 40.56 34.20 PUBLIC SAFETY POLICE 59.92 54.78 75.27 51.57 56.85 FIRE 7.35 8.14 12.00 7.04 16.63 OVERALL 62.43 73.32 99.79 100.40 77.89 ---------------------------------------------------~------------- ! I I . TABLE~: SHORE WOOD BUDGET CoMPAR:l:SoNS 1983 1984 1985 MAYOR/COUNCIL . . . . . . . . 22,160 22,923 23,613 ADMINISTRATOR . . . . . . . . 33,961 38,327 40,125 GENERAL GOVERNMENTAL SERVICES . . 91,733 85,524 98,492 GENERAL SALARIES . 28,009 42,383 40,596 FINANCE . . . . . . . . . 53,318 57,054 65,235 LEGAL . . . . . . . . . . . . 37,084 36,752 44,400 LITIGATION . . 10,000 PLANNING AND ZONING . . 27,094 35,330 37,164 MUNICIPAL BUILDING. . 207 16,510 17,260 POLICE. . . . . . . . 240,341 270,747 295,159 FIRE. . . . . . . . 34,713 41 , 572 46,505 PROTECTIVE INSPED . . . . . 19,593 24,566 25,570 PUBLIC WORKS. . . 89,747 97,944 98,519 EQUIPMENT. . . . . 70,320 74,300 GARAGE . . . . 7,712 11,850 16,250 STREETS . . . . . . . . . . . 49,164 71,906 74,006 STREET IMPROVEMENT 11 7 , 330 119,818 SEAL COATING . . . 14,880 10,000 STORM WATER PROJECTS . . . . 80,000 0 SNOW AND ICE REMOVAL. . 17,858 17,061 19,061 TRAFFIC CONTROL . . . . . . 7,415 10,003 9,003 STREET LIGHTING . 6, 108 7,500 8,000 SANITATION, ETC. 5,394 10,013 10,213 TREE MAINTENANCE . . . . 5,022 6,463 8,513 PARKS AND RECREATION . . . . 34,219 44,008 45,198 GENERAL GOVERNMENT EXPENDITURES. 265,350 275,910 319,029 PER CAPITA . . . . . . . . . 56.22 59.39 68.66 GENERAL FUND TOTALS. . . . . . . 788,344 1,227,101 1,360,830 * ----------------------------------------------------------------- 1~ t7'ilD ~ ~. GENERAL RECOMMENDATZONS 1. General data indicate. that the administrative staff for a city of Shorewoods size may be too large. Consolidate personnel by combining job responsibilities and reducing staff. 2. Use part time help to fill in clerical and non-salaried positions, thus reducing labor and benefit costs. 3. The mill rate needs to be brought into line with surrounding communities. This could be achieved by reducing per capita spending. The average mill rate of the four reference cities in the study is 18.16 while Shorewood is at 24.08 which ranks us in the bottom third of Minnesota cities (between 69-73rd) with those on the top having the lowest mill rates. Therefore, the budget needs to be trimmed $250,000 to 290,000. 4. Shared services and personnel should be considered with surrounding communities to reduce personnel and equipment costs. 5. Continue to explore all potential sources of funds from state grants to service fees. 6. When possible use liquor sales revenues to alleviate expenses. 7. The City Councilor its representative should meet with persons in the top three categories of delinquent taxes and assessments to discuss their delinquencies and arrive at possible ways to payoff or reduce them. 8. Council should approach Senator Gen Olson and discuss possible legislation which would allow cities and other governmental units to charge current interest rates on unpaid taxes and/or assessments where applicable. q 0--c.. . - ~~ <; ^<> ..j ("'. -1-. <.~~~.,- ,._..~."...) ,+_----0 uJfL/",L.<:/J.. Ju 0.. ~0.... c- -k..J uf---.-LJ " 1 .A (e (e , MAYOR Robert Rascop COUNCIL Jan Haugen Tad Shaw Alexander Leonardo Robert Gagne ADMINISTRATOR Doug Uhrhammer CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD . SHOREWOOD. MINNESOTA 55331 . (612) 474-3236 MEMO TO: PLANNING COMMISSION, MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: BRAD NIELSEN DATE: 15 APRIL 1983 RE: SHOREWOOD CONDOMINIUMS - PROPOSED 39-UNIT MULTIPLE FAMILY DWELLING FILE NO.: 405 (83.06) BACKGROUND Mr. Duane Barth, Tingewood, Inc. has requested concept stage approval for a planned unit development consisting of a three-story, 39-unit condominium project. The proposed site is located at 5620 County Road 19 (on the west side of Co. Rd. 19, just north of the Tom Thumb store - see Site Location map, attached). The property consists of one parcel, 253,792 square feet in area (5.83 acres). The land is divided by two zoning districts. The west 345 feet (2.21 acres) is zoned R-2, and the remaining 3.62 acres is zoned C-3. The site is occupied by a single family residence. Surrounding land use and zoning are as follows: north: church, zoned R-2; proposed apartment project, zoned R-4; single family dwelling, zoned R-4 east: shopping center in Tonka Bay, zoned commercial south: convenience grocery store, gas station, American Legion Club, apartment building and undeveloped land, zoned C-3; single family residences, zoned R-2 west: undeveloped rear yard of a large single family lot, zoned R-2 A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South S'1ore /{}-/ \ . . Shorewood Planning Commission, Mayor and City Council 15 April 1983 Page Two The applicant proposes to convert the existing house to a small office. Since P.U.D.'s involving mixed use require a minimum land area of 20 acres, he pro- poses to divide off 10,832 square feet for the office, leaving the zoning C-3. The remainder of the site is included in the P.U.D. The office would share joint parking area with the condominiums. ISSUES AND ANALYSIS The proposed project has taken the planned unit development approach for two reasons. First, it consolidated the two zoning districts which currently ex- ist on the property, allowing for cohesive land use of the total site. Sec- ondly, development is allowed to be concentrated on the front one third of the site, minimizing street and utility costs and allowing the developer to avoid area within an existing drainageway while at the same time creating a holding pond to minimize drainage problems. What has been presented is the General Concept Plan for the P.U.D.. Based up- on review of the Shorewood Comprehensive Plan and the Shorewood Zoning Ordi- nance, particularly Section 27.A. related to planned unit development, the following issues are presented: A. Required Information. The information required for a P.U.D. has been in- cluded in the applicant's plans. The Site Summary contained on Exhibit B should be of particular interest. According to the applicant, units will range in price from $70,000 - $95,000. Six of the units are proposed as three bedroom units, with the remaining units divided between one and two bedroom units. The only items not submitted to date are the articles of incorporation, by- laws, etc. for the condominium. Since these are fairly standard, it is suggested that the requirement be waived until the Development Stage of the project (assuming Concept Stage is approved). This would allow any items required by the City to be included in the documents. B. Land Use. As in any rezoning request, the primary issue to be resolved is one of land use. Although the C-3 District currently allows multiple fam- ily residential by conditional use, it must be realized that the C-3 Dis- trict is typically used and intended for commercial activity. Therefore, the proposed use involves a change from the previously intended use of the property. In evaluating this change in use, the Comprehensive Plan should serve as the basic decision-making guide. Although the Proposed Land Use Plan shows a commercial pattern for the eastern portion of the subject site, it must be realized that this was based largely upon existing zoning. The area plan for Planning District 6 suggests somewhat more flexibility, supporting the Shorewood Condominiums request. The concept of higher density residen- tial uses located near activity centers and along major traffic carriers is reiterated. The area plan specifically states that three to six units per acre is acceptable as a land use transition from commercial activity and County Road 19 to lower density areas to the west. Although the Plan sug- . . Shorewood Planning Commission, Mayor and City Council 15 April 1983 Page Three gests townhouses and quadraminiums, given the desirability of concentrating development on the site, the proposed housing style is considered consistent with the Plan. In further evaluating the request, the advantages and disadvantages of resi- dential as opposed to commercial use should be considered. 1. Site Impact. There is little doubt that the proposed use results in far less impact than if it were developed as commercial. Commercial zoning would allow as much as 80% of the site to be covered with structures and blacktop. As proposed, the condominiums cover only 14.4% of the site. Although development has been concentrated on the front one third of the site, it is still less than commercial development might allow and the remaining two thirds of the site are left as open space. It should be noted that the ponding area being created presumably takes care of stormwater runoff from the site itself, possibly even allevia- ting drainage problems outside of the site. This should be subject to review and comment by the City Engineer. 2. Traffic. This is an obvious concern due to the existing volume and con- gestion on County Road 19. Thirty-nine condo units will generate between 5 - 7 trips per unit per day - a total of 195 - 273 trips per day. Al- though we can only speculate as to what type of commercial activity might occur on the site, it is reasonable to assume that even a moderately suc- cessful commercial area could generate a much greater volume of traffic. One thing that might be expected relative to traffic is that residents' familiarity with existing traffic patterns and problems may result in fewer accidents than the occasional commercial users might. 3. Parks. The proposed condominiums will have greater impact on area parks than commercial development would. The Comprehensive Plan notes that although park facilities are nearby, they are separated by busy streets. Given the amount of open space included in the project, smaller children should have ample room for play area on the site. Older children wish- ing to use organized sports facilities should be able to negotiate the necessary streets and intersections. The Shorewood Parks Commission should review and comment relative to Park issues. 4. Tax Base. Based upon the applicant's estimated unit price range. the development would be valued at approximately $3,217,500. As condomini- ums, homestead credits would apply. In this light, it is reasonable to assume that commercial development, taxed at its full value, could easily generate more taxes. This is somewhat balanced by the fact that the City will not have to take over and maintain any roads or utilities. Thus max- imum taxes are generated while need for additional services is minimized (this assumes that police and fire service would be the same for either commercial or multiple family development). (e (e Shorewood Planning Commission, Mayor and City Council 15- April 1983 Page Four 5. Elimination of Commercial Zoning. The proposal reduces the amount of commercial land, which is already in short supply in Shorewood. Judg- ing from recent comments by some City Officials and residents, it is difficult to know whether this is an advantage or disadvantage. By the same token, the project increases the amount of multiple family residen- tial area which is in even shorter supply. In considering land use acceptability the issue of density inevitably arises. Although the existing C-3 District allows multiple family dwellings, by con- ditional use permit, the Ordinance is somewhat vague as to what density is allowed. Using the R-5 requirement of one unit per 3500 square feet of lot area, there could be as many as 37.8 units on the commercial portion of the site alone. This translates to 12.5 units per acre. The Comprehensive Plan allows just over six units per acre (considering the 10% increase for P.U.D.'s). Given what could occur in a C-3 District, the 6.99 units per acre being pro- posed is considered reasonably consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. C. Site Design. The following general comments relate to the overall design of the project. 1. Direct access to County Road 19 is minimized. 2. Impact on surrounding land uses is minimal. The existing house north of the project is the only one affected. The R-4 zoning of that prop- erty suggests that apartments could be built there in the future. 3. Underground parking minimizes the amount of site coverage and visual impact of the parking lot. 4. The layout is consistent with the setback parameters established by the P.U.D. District. RECOMMENDATION In view of the preceding analysis, the Shorewood Condominiums project is con- sidered consistent with Shorewood's Comprehensive Plan and zoning requirements. Assuming favorable review and comment by the City Engineer it is recommended that the City grant Concept Stage approval for the project as proposed. Subsequent Development Stage review should focus on the details of site drain- age, access and landscaping. BJN:kw cc: Doug Uhrhammer Jim Norton Gary Larson Duane Barth Mark Koegler Shorewood Park Commission Kathy West - iD ~, ::) ~ ~~(J) C( .. '!lIp'~ ~Cf~lM '" JeY"I^ ..... i'U. I'W"I^ J.O' A- ~ :!.. ~ ~ '" L --, I \.,-/ ~7'JI'" ~ ~ 'f:I.. ~ s- 4N0.1 'V ... JMS S'fH ro --"--'-'lof--~' ~ ~ -.....- -:--- '1' --r~ ~':1 , , _ ~ .. :-- 'J" -. '~: ~ ,.. ~ ~ -----t.,.'r - o ";:' ~ N ~ u- --- -ilm - ----- ~~zm ~ "PIt . ;T :d~~ !! ~ (\!~.,.. ' '&..J ~ ~. --'-~"I"KiiF--T , m~ r; _ '~ - -- If, "" --- -, '~ CD ':i;' - ~ .......... II) ~ \J" - ~ .- - ~-~~~ ~ .--- I, <t'C)' .reI z ~ ... ,,0. \ I - ".... ". ~~jA-; AH~' <x ~ o ~ - ~ .J.../r.. ...., . "- ..: ~ ...." l\..} '- r ~ ..:::;..I a .+.; f CD ... N 0 9 c - ~ l J; \t' \' \J'\ ....{ . ~ ~ l-~ ~:.. ~ ~ I I t I S'Zf! ~ '" ;; ...) ~- ~ 0 N 'M Exhibit A SITE LOCATION Shorewood Condonimiums Proposed P.D.D. - 9, ,n ....-- !!! >I' ~ :1/') ~ ,,: . ---~ 'VO"tl"'OlllO ;-g ~ ~~:::: cn ~ "" "" c.. -. 5' 5' 5' 5' 0 l!=! .g' lD lD lD CD ODl"'O:xJO ogo,Zo ::J..<c< c.. ~ 0: ::;' !!: O. CDIODl ~,~~~cg :!.)>......... ~n(ll(ll... . m co O-.cmOl o:xJ..,'Oo IO-Dl ijlcnDlnm ::o:g:-? ::i~m ~ ......" . C)'iii'Dl 0 ~ c~ ... I CIlI cn ..... ...(11 COOl ..... ~al! al! '2, "'m CO _, ~; o CIlI o ... I\) o C)t>:l t>:l >< z:::r t>:l 1-" :;00- > 1-" t""'r-t (")t:l:J o Z (") t>:l 'i:I ~ 'i:I t""' > Z "'O"'O"'O1ll:;-:?~ Q~~~ Dl Dl Dl C - ~ (J) ~ cn 0 -, ;. ;. ~ ::: 0 ~. __ n a: 'C ~ _. _, _. c.. 0 _ a. CD 0-, ::J~~5'<,< CDcn~ lDlDlDlD CD" CD r-alOlD "'0 :xJ Dl .. iii ?,::J 2. iii' c.. N .., 1O::J"'lD co- )o-NO ~ ~ c..,!1' 10 CO 0;0 ;0 r- 0 2, 0: ::;' S' ~ C - Dl 2. 5' ~ ~ ~ <' I\) ~ :.: )0 l!=! ., ,. ".10 m cn 0'" 0 ...~(II~.c .CDOI COI\)CODl' "'0 CIlI!l?' e.> '<" !!: e.> e.> Dl mcm!,! _ I\)I\)Dl ~ ~a.~...' )0 m~::Jc.. i>>!!:nco~ ~ -?"(oc..:xJ nlD CDO,Ol CD "Ol"'O I CD.., cn co. _oCI\) mg Ole.> Q . mO '0 ~ mal! 0 ~.c ~c.. -? g: ~~ CD _ ....., N:- cn.:.: (II 0 o )0'" ... ~~ CIlI (II ... CIlI al! ~ G) m z m :D )> r () 0 Z () m z -0 0 ~ -I s - '< ~ en , I \J " .~ ... CD en c:: 3 3 S>> ~ '< ~ " , "" . "'. " .. . ~ ~ :'-S C> .,. --. \ \ en' ~ \ ManitoU--A-ve.nue. \19 .. ; __-' - -t _-:::::: I ' .. -~-'--- ~ u------------O\-/;o---r-~ -- en__------if CD :E :E Dl - . . . '\ MAYOR Robert Rascop COUNCI L Jan Haugen Tad Shaw Kristi Stover Robert Gagne CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD . SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 . (612) 474-3236 MEMORANDUM TO: PLANNING COMMISSION, MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: BRAD NIELSEN DATE: 30 MAY 1985 RE: GIDEON'S ORCHARD P.U.D. - CONCEPT PLAN FILE NO. 405 (85.19) BACKGROUND In 1983 the City granted concept stage approval for a planned unit develop- ment consisting of a three-story, 39-unit condominium project which was to be built at 5620 County Road 19 (Shorewood Condominiums). Prior to receiving development stage approval, the applicant's deadline expired and the project was dropped. The owner (and previous applicant) has now arranged to sell the property to Wellesly Homes, Inc. Ms. Kristin Spencer-Barney, president of Wellesly Homes, has now resubmitted plans to continue the project under the name of Gideon's Orchard. While the proposal must be treated as a new application, it is so similar to the previously approved request that the previous staff report, dated 15 April 1983, is enclosed herein as a background for the new request. Applicant has submitted a letter, attached as Exhibit A, and a modified site plan, ~ttached as Exhibit B. ANALYSIS/RECOMENDATION Despite modifications to the site plan, the issues raised in the 1983 review of the Shorewood Condominiums P.U.D. proposal are still pertinent. In addition, the following should be considered: A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore /b . . PLANNER'S REPORT GIDEON'S ORCHARD P.U.D. 3.0 MAY 1985 page two A. Commercial Use. The Shorewood Condominiums request proposed to convert the small existing house on the site to office space. As explained in the seventh paragraph of Exhibit A, the .new proposal would convert the house to a retail clothing store. B. Drainage. The earlier proposal included a ponding area at the center of the site to accommodate drainage. Although not shown on Exhibit B, the ponding area has been discussed with the applicant. Assuming the concept stage is approved, the ultimate size and design of the ponding area should be addressed in detail in the development stage of the P.U.D. process. C. Setbacks. Respective of the single-family dwelling to the north, the site plan shows the building and parking 50 feet from the northern- most property line. Since the proposal was submitted che zoning of the property to the north has been changed to R-C, and a conditional use permit has been approved to convert the house into an office build- ing. Consequently, the setback on the condominiums could be reduced somewhat. This would allow the builder to avoid an area of question- able soils at the south side of the site. Site drainage may also be better facilitated by moving the building northward. D. Financial Assurances. In the past the City has not involved itself in the financial capability of a builder to develop a project. Recent experience has suggested that the City should be concerned over whether a project can be completed. While this is no reflection on the appli- cant, it is recommended that, as a condition of approval, evidence of their financial capability to complete the project should be sub- mitted for staff review. This should occur prior to issuance of a building permit. Site improvements such as parking, landscaping and construction of the ponding area, will be covered by a performance bond or letter of credit in the amount of 150 percent of the estimated cost of the improvements. Based upon the previous approval from 1983, and the analysis contained in this report and the report from April of 1983, it is recommended that the concept plan for the Gideon's Orchard P.U.D. be approved. The applicant should be directed to prepare devleopment stage plans, paying particular attention to the design of the site drainage and retention pond. cc: Dan Vogt Glenn Froberg Jim Norton Sue Niccum Kristin Spencer-Barney " . . 0."1M C !be propoaed Planned WDit Ievele~Rt ceo.ists of two ..in ele...ts. The greater portion <951.) of the laDCl area viii be devotecl to re.idential uses and the COal- aOI1 areas are for the ...t part a.signed to residential .se .. wll. It i. our propo.al to construct a 39 unit condaainium cOaplex, with it. interior parking concealed beaeath the structure. The c.ndOmini.... would r&Dge in space frOll ..5 to 1,335 s.uare feet and in price frOll the upper fifties to the upper eighties. 'the CORdOaliat...... are iatended to serve both the younger, entry Inel aDd retir....nt markets at a price aare affordable thaa wlatcla i. current 1,. avaU- able for .iallar developaeuts ia the lake )d.nnetonka area. . A hOmeowner.' ...ociation will have control of the maintaiaeDCe and care of the developnaent. 'fhe co.aercial property will share in the ..intaiunce of the ,ark- lng area that it .hare. in co..on with the condo.1ni.... We have ....~led a con.ulting group of the top landplanuer, engineers and de- .igners in the !Vin Citie. area. Great care has been taken to create a design in baraony with the surrounding landfor.s. We are e.pecially concerned with keeping .. many of the ..t..e tree. .. i. pos.ible. The large fore.ted area surrounding the .tructure will contain a pend to collect the runoff .ater that currently cro..es to the adjoining two lots to tile aorth. We are currently investigating a nUaBber of option. for the recreational \l88 of the remainder of the co.aons area as it would best .erve the "park" concept. In keeping with the propo.ed ..me of the developal!nt, "Gideon'. er chard " , we would like to plant apple trees around t~ ,.ri~ter of the collecting pond. The parking will be arranged in .uch a way that it will serve both the conde- ainiums and the ...11 c....rcial building that is the etlulr _in element in the P.W.D. 'lbis will allow a aare harmOnious look, with a consolidation of entry, and a preservation of the '..illage Sho," look prevalent in the Lake Minnetonka area. 'I'he .hop i. intended to be used for the sale. of better ladie. .portswear, mainly the Esprit line. 'l'hi. would se.. to be a walc0a8 addition, as aothing siailar is offered in the general vicinity. While providing a needed service, this c0nn8rc1al use 'WOuld fit ia _11 witla the residential area adjoi~ing. We feel that, such a develo~nt a. we have described viii greatly enhance the appearance and value of the .urrouuding areas, particularly wlaen contra.ted to the present ap~arance and u.e of the land. Exhibit & .APPLICAN'!;'S P.1fZIJ.. PROPOS~. Gideon.. .O.rcharctP. U. D. .~ . ~ ! . i . I ~-----_/ ~ _J:;i:O? i ' ,------- _-- ~l' ')--~,-";9--_~~--.- ---:.. '-'l-..~;;;z~";;-z -, -~ '~--t~-- ~.., , ___ -: --~ - [: - ---'t."~; i I-~' -l=::==~1 ~ '~i ~/ I \ ~ --------~.c . II --~ ~~:'~; ~ , "'"' ~ . -~..&- \ ~ iTt--1 ,~ 'I "''' Si, \I ~. --- --.. '-~l dr' fr-. ~, (fll - !~r-- '/,}k I"'r-- }" ) ""', ,- ~ .~ ... j ....,.. ... ~ ----- ., '- -----~----- - - - !~ _ _ _. _ _ _, i l :.::-__- -;-- - ,/ \~ ' \\ ~--.;;:::: ~ , i - -.~ i iiG ~ ..c.rZ .01 __ ..... -- I';' 'j i:j ! ::: ' --- --'-""" ,. ; ,-...... .., '?-~ I ;. --I ___ I ~ ! "\, --~-, ~, \ I '-..---"'--...:_-~ .~,- '- ..~t~SJ../~, ---- \ -----., '- '''-, \\ \ \ ,.. \ ~. \ \ \ , , \ I i 1 \ " \ .'\. '. " 1 \ \ \ ! ! 1 \ t ~ I , / I I I // , --- \ --. ."~ - / / " ......-- --.-" / , / /' ,,/ / --- " " ---- / ../' ----- ---- , ,-~'" --- ---- " .-- - ...-/ ---- --- .- -~ -- -" ....~ ---.... ...~- ----.--- ----- ----. -- - . --- ----- --- --- .:/-/, .;:-- -------- --- --- - -.-- / / _/ /-- ------ -- --- - ~... /-; //'//---..-/""'-- ~ ------- -.- - ,/ // --- ---- - -- // /' ---- / / / // / ---- '-, , -- ---. ----.- --- ---- " \ \ '. / / ---- --- .<__~_3_;: -' ''\,.'' Exhibit B PROPOSED SITE PLAN . . 0 II 'II II II II I t "I II ---rt II ~ I I II II II : I I II II 'II II II --u ,I ... . II .() () II I' - - ... II II .. $! I~ 'II I l II c i II 1 II . I II . I ,II I · OlD II I, 5 II II i '.. ' , fI. t. . , 1-. .. ~ ~ ~ '7.. 'C. ~~If~,; ~ ' -~- '*:.~ .~;.<~,..:~" ~~.''''~1' "'~. ". .~. ~,,:.i.; '1-.;':1' . U ~. :~j~ ' ,; ." ..... .... '. '. '.' ;;, ""-",>-,.......,..~.....'.:~.-':<!- ,~~"".. ,.. ... Exhibit C BUILDINGEiEVATION~ f~ "\ . June 12, 198." Re: Placement of Stop Sign at 5 Corners at the intersection of St. Albans Bay Road and Manor Road to stop traffic coming away from Highway 7 down the hill. Christie Stover, COi.hdlwoman Village of Shorewood 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, MN 55331 We, the undersigned Citizens of Shorewood, wish to show our concern for the safety of the children in our neighborhood (ie. at the bus stop which includes approximately 30 children at different times, at Manor Park where many children play all year around, and in the streets where many ride their bicycles). We have been informed that Greenwood is putting up a Stop sign at this inter- section, but covering the traffic coming from the other direction. We feel that it is very important and necessary to cover both directions due to the fact that traffic coming down the hill moves very fast, many times exceeding the 25 m.p.h. speed limit (many of us have already called several times to report this). We would like to request that you consider this problem at your next council meeting on June 24, 1985. Thank you. . { \ '--.", . .. June 12, 1985 Re: Petition for Stop sign at 5 corners /1' 1/ /'/ / f.-:f 6 {f () ~J.~L~+1 ~ ~ ;7 't ,00 b / :~~dE ~__ ~\\,41\\.-~~(c~ 4/ 1 \ /'Jt . 'J ~ '. !.' 50~.~m~~l~.. .h.~I~",<'. q'- -----,. ~L L~;-'~. ..i C,.5 ~_...... "~l~~,. ; '-7 "I ('.-- o/)~ A ..)' I) ["r.. 'I ,.,. --,. \'~ ') "'-. : L~ Q ~I V. /JI'v I' '- '--f ' \ I / '" , ~~'d-it j.,#" ---TpqO :-t"itll i!.4uJ (~,.....r\~(.>,,~;i . il/'ILI.."'~:" ..-' 2::~' '~ ~ 'M ..=R~~;~-~~::'6~tr----Z~{~.5~:17 ~~ - . ..... ...p ..........fkI(j-_.~--..,. ... .. U ,J t. ~ ,-^-,- - i -9,0<;'00 1')" . '7'-1 GS1-1f, ~ _~____.___....1-JOS'qS. IIltJ/fOf RrI ; "Ilf-6/b-8 ~.. .' ! .:;) ~ ~ ! 't7Lj-t;' 2~i .~ C"h~-.J21~--. d~ __~_.~DS.LS.._--2Jl-a'-(,~jU_~-.. . Y 1 ~-Q :; , I. I \.\. t( (( ! Y7'i-(",ol'i \ .. ...--t....-..................--.....--.... ...... ..)).;,;-.--------..--.' ---'---'.-' _-_.-m..-~02[LC/&~~j~.fft-t.-i:::4L.._-_-1...ru -8'~:J 7 ""'_n. _. _. . ....12/!_'i.tf...I )~L_ 15,/.2.......---. ______J..~27f.ff)![7 _ ~_;5~/~- Sl.If1Ii?~jl~~-/&4;--_.: 4f1~:.~/72-- - :'ZRJ" ~/Yl~~.'f7t/.q{~31 I ()O~5tJ ;tALl/tOI I!./)~L .._.__.L.ti.Zq.q~).31 ! I ...------..---............ i -------f-----..---...--.--....----.--... i ...j-.... I j...-. .-., --.' .--.-. -','-' -.- j ... ._u _.... .._ _0'''",_, .1.. ........." .._m._._......n.... In.. .---' ..- -----.- ... ...-..---.----- .1 ____._.__..._=--.-..-_..-L. _.."_.- ---- -~.-===~~-:~~~.---~~=-t~==-. -------~~ ~~-.-=-~==~-'-~F'----='- If you have any questions, please call Bill or Judy Gullifer (474-9639). C< , CITY OF SHOREWOOD MAYOR Robert Rascop COUNCI L Jan Haugen Tad Shaw Kristi Stover Robert Gagne ADMINISTRATOR Daniel J. Vogt 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD . SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 · (612) 474-3236 MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: RE: FILE NO. MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL BRAD NIELSEN 21 JUNE 1985 .~ Lot 11, Radisson Inn Addition - Request for Building Permit 404 (General) As I mentioned at a recent meeting, Adrian Johnson has requested a building permit for the above-referenced property. Although I informed him that I would not issue him a permit, due to his failure to complete the Tingewood project, he is still interested in knowing whether the property is build- able. Presumably, someone else will apply for the permit. Having received a $500 deposit to cover legal expense for the City Attor- ney's opinion regarding existing easements on the site, the request is now referred to the Council for review. As background information the follow- ing is attached: - memo to Finance Department re: receipt of $500 deposit, dated 20 June 1985 - memo to me from City Attorney's office re: Legal opinion, dated 4 June 1985 - letter from David Walker, dated 1 June 1985 - Watershed District variance to allow 50 foot lake shore setback, dated 23 April 1985 - survey, dated 2 April 1985, showing location of the proposed building - legal opinion from Mackall, Crounse and Moore, dated 11 July 1977 Considering the timing of the request relative to the status of the new Zoning Ordinance, it is likely that the request will be subject to the requirements of the new Ordinance. Although this item is not currently on the agenda for the 24 June meeting, it can be discussed under Planner's reports or Attorney's reports. If there are any questions prior to the meeting, please contact my office. BJN:rd cc: Dan Vogt Glenn Froberg A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore )D From . ~A_~ / )-,IJ/~- ~ ~ , To 't,J ~J . Subject ~ ~ /1 ~-"~;....,,, ~ ()~jl:l~J - I.;;' jY*4;t -N~ 9& 10FOlD ~~~. >> 4~.I~ ~, II , .. ~ ~d4~__, Date ~ /~O Ja5' I I . . Signed ~p. rf/~ / REPLY Nc 9FOLO -No lCi~OlD . Date Signed WilsonJones GRAYlINE FORM 44-902 3-PART c 1983. PAINTED IN U S:A SENDER-DETACH AND RETAIN YELLOW COPY. SEND WHITE AND PINK COPIES WITH CARBON INTACT. , " GLENN FROBERG ATTORNEY AT LAW 17736 EXCELSIOR BOULEVARD MINNETONKA. MINNESOTA 55345 TELEPHONE (612) 474-2100 To: Brad Nielsen, Planner From: Paul B. Ahern, FROBERG AND PENBERTHY, P.A. Re: Lot 11, Radisson Inn Addition, Christmas Lake Date: 4 June 1985 This concerns the proposed development of Lot 11 of the Radisson Inn Addition on Christmas Lake. Presently, the lot is subject to an easement over and upon said lot, existing in favor of all of the lot owners in the Radisson Inn Addition for the purpose of ingress and egress to the bathing beach adjoining the said lot. Lot 11 is also a substandard lot of record because of inadequacies concerning the width and depth of the lot. The sole issue for the City of Shorewood is whether or not a building permit, for the construction of a dwelling, should be issued. First, because this is a substandard lot in a shore land district, a conditional use permit is required, and the applicant must show under Shorewood Zoning Ordinance S 200.24 Subd. 5(b) that: 1. The lot meets all standards of the applicable zoning use district. 2. The lot is in separate ownership from abutting lands. 3. Except for lot area, all other sanitary and dimensional requirements of the shore lan~ district are complied with insofar as practical (70% with and set back requirements) . A "shore land impact plan" must also be filed and approved, see S 200.24 Subd. 6. The problem with the easement in this case is a private matter between the owner of Lot 11 and the residents of the Radissonlnn 4~'- Addition. The City of Shorewood should only be concerned with whether it can issue a conditional use permit under its zoning ordinance. Nevertheless, my research on the issue indicates that a dwelling could legally be built upon Lot 11, as long as the dwelling does not obstruct access to the bathing beach adjoining Lot 11. Also, the dwelling must not limit the use of the beach as a bathing beach, or for the uses intended when the easement was granted. See, Chabot v. Paradise, 272 N.W. 2d 251 (Minn, 1978); Minneapolis Athletic Club v. Cohler, 287 Minn 254, 177 N.W. 2d 786 (1970); Bartlett v. Stalker Lake Sportmen's Club, 283 Minn 393, 168 N.W. 2d 356 (1969); and Farnes v. Lane, 281 Minn 223, 161 N.W.2d 297 (1968). I June. 1984 20485 Radisson Inn Road Shorewood, MN 55331 Mr. Brad Nielson Shorewood Building Inspector Shorewood City OrFices Country Club Road Shorewood. MN 55331 Dear Mr. Nielson. It has come to my attention that a request ror a building permit on Lot 11 Radisson Inn Addition has recently been made. As one or many property owners with an ownership interest by easement across the whole or that lot who has enjoyed its rree and unrestricted use ror almost 40 years. I wish to make objection to the authorizing or a bui lding permit or any kind, to anyone. ror any purpose. without my written consent. Having communicated this same message to the Council. I trust you will not respond to the appl icants request berore the city has had opportunity to give this matter a thorough review. yours. David Walker ~g"""~~ ~ ~ . I I . ~~ .::;$ i9.s)iED O\~ WATERiliEO BOUNOUY / MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT P.O. Box 387, Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 BOARD OF MANAGERS: David H. Cochran, Pres. . Albert l. Lehman . John E. Thomas Michael R. Carroll. Camille D. Andre. James B. McWethy . James R. Spensley Permit Application No: 85-35 Date: April 23, 1985 Applicant/Owner: Roy Ahern 6449 Barrie Road Minneapolis, MN 55435 Location: City of Shorewood, Sec. 36BBD, Christmas Lake Purpose: 50 foot lake setback variance Dear Mr. Ahern: At the regularly sCheduled April 18, 1985 meeting of the Board of Managers, the subject permit application was reviewed along with the following exhibits: 1. Permit Application 85-35. 2. Site survey showing a 50. setback from the closest point of a building pad to the water level on April 2, 1985. Survey prepared by M. Gronberg, P.E., dated April 2, 1985. The Board approved the permit application as submitted. This document is your permit from the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. It is valid for one (1) year. If construction is not complete within one (1) year, an extension is required. Please contact the District at 473-4224 when this project is about to commence so an inspector may view the work in progress. EUGENE A. HICKOK AND ASSOCIATES Engineers for the Dis~ric~ /ld~kL//a /~ MiChael A. Panzer, P.E. t' fj;B/8~ Date of Issue I cc: Board G. Macomber Adj:i an Johnson ~ Nielsen, Shorewood bt Certificate of Survey for Tingewood Construction, Inc. of Lot 11, Radisson Inn Addition ""i;;:ioO' ~ ~ E,..\!ot il'\~ :...I ~O\J~e. ',:; ~-. r" o.. . , o' N '. -S-o. /, fb "? /. o'/' ro<' ,'\.-/. ,OJ /' .:\ 1.. ,//. ~q{' ~~ ,/ o'f- "?,,, /. ~,~~ V /. ~o<e; "::> -./.? ~~ e:,-<- CV ~ q.> I hereby certify that this is a true and correct representation of a survey of the boundaries of Lot 11, Radisson Inn Addition, according to the recorded plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota, and of the location of all buildings, if any, thereon. It does not purport to show any other improvements or encroachments. Scale: Date o 1 inch = 40 feet April 2, 1985 1'-/1 -BS iron marker ~ /lin,u r4_ COFFIN & GRONBERG, INC. ~de~~12755- Gordon R. Coffin Reg. No. 6064 Engineers and Land Surveyors Long Lake, Minnesota Phone 473-4141 ~.. /5070 rj , . -. ..~ ~..V'" y,'~ I ,_,~'1. ~ : "';.uIal.~' [ l I . MAI:KALL~CROUN5E & MOORE , LAW OPFICES .600 ,.t..aT N",'''i.HAL .ANIt .UILDING HINN'EAtlDL.IS. H INN E5DTA S 5402 Df' c.".....r~ wEN." C. ....;... ....L. THO..A..... _.:....1,. . .1 .- ~JJ-I~.I AIt&A C:DD& .'2 '.Eoee.CI ". ,t,.C,,'IC.O ........'0' PC..' It, MOO-C .....01'., OaN.~D.. ..b~MC' ,,10."1'11 . .D.~." M. e.o"..'t....J.I.'.a July 11, 1977 j I .... ... Bay~., , 'r 1Ir. Hayes: We have reviewed the easement over Lot 11, Radisson Inn IMition which reads as follows: . permanent. easement over and9PO~ c8aidLotfor -'1;h8 benefit of all of the owners; 't;heir heiril and asaigna ;'-ot .1:h.e Lot~ of .aldRadisson Inn Addi t.ion fort:hepurpo~eof ingress-Alld. .gress"tothe .. bat.hi,ng beach --.'aj61-nlng 'saIQ~t 11,"'ltadls8on--:'Xnn Addition. ., _ u _ . .~. . . j' . ~~,.:;.~. . ,~.It is our understanding that. at the 'time of the creation thi. e.sement the Lot was used as an access t.o a bathing beach, , . .that boats were sto~~ and docked by the Radisson Inn pn other ;. ~.. In light of this ~t.uation, it is ap~arent that the ease- , ~ i. limited.to the p~oses intended, i.e. for bathing purposes . aaly. The case of Farnes'T. Lane (281 Minn. 222) has decided 'that ownereof an easemenl do not have riparian:.'rights, as owners ~ lake shore property, but that they are limited to the rights ~ by the easement. In the case of Minnea~lis Athletic Club . ' ler (287 Minn~' 254 at 258) the Court state : ~ ., -It is well ..tt1ed tha.t the extent of' an easement should not be enlarged by legal ~onstruction beyond the object originally contemplated or expressly agreed upon by t.he parties.- .~.' ; ~ " . . il :J ,. We call your attention the the fact that the only persons ~Ued to use the easement are the owners of Lots in Radisson Inn 'M41tion .' " ;,f, "'1: , .f ,', " "_' .....-~.... . ~ ~I. t~:"'.f\i'-':"'''t;':'' ~ . _ ~. _ _ ~_!! 'IJ' ~ f ,. ~ - . JI. .P. l: Jt !'" 'r ... . " ", t' MA'CKALL, C'ACUNSE & MOORE .". , " , ':'IG I " . . . '"1~"''' . . '::, o~,! ~~r" '. . Lot 11 18 regilt.ered land. As such, no ri.~hts are - Jl. ' .ted in per.onl who uae the land adversely for o~er purposes C, V", 'specifically grant.ed t.o them, no matter for what period of .' 0 such adverse use is made. {M. S .A. S50 8.02) 0 :to " : , . (. 0 The1;'efore., based, upon the above, it is our opinion that 'tJ ", ,.~' ",easement refer~ed to, above is limited ~o access t.o the lake ,r "bathing purpo... only, which does not l.nclude storage of boats , ' .' 'any other'equi~nt and does not include t.he right to maintain i\~ on the~~hore.Une:of Lo~::~,t::~::U:S~OORE . · <Jerald B&J'e8 11, 1977 ' !Wo f t ~ r .. ~ ~ L .. f,'--~ By , F. L. Thorson 1'L'l': dd . . . . ., 9 ...... . '.- OFFICIAL SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. 168 On 28 May 1985 the Shorewood Shorewood Zoning Ordinance. this Official Summary of the City Council adopted Ordinance No. On 24 June 1985 the Shorewood City Ordinance. 168, entitled Council adopted Ordinance No. 168 is an interim Ordinance which serves as a comprehensive re- vision to Ordinance No. 77 as amended. It is the intent of the City Council to enforce this Ordinance for a period of six months pending further study of sever- al detailed provisions within the Ordinance. At the end of six months the Ord- inance will either be adopted as written, or modified based upon conclusions of studies conducted by the Planning Commission and City Council. The purpose of Ordinance No. 168 is to protect the public health, safety and general welfare of the community and its people through the establishment of minimum regulations governing development and use of land within the City of Shorewood. This Ordinance shall divide the City into various land use districts and establish regulations pertaining to location, erection, construction. re- construction, alterations, and use of structures and use of land. These regu- lations are established tp promote orderly development and redevelopment; to provide adequate light, air and convenience of access to property; to prevent congestion in the public right-of-way: to prevent overcrowding of land and undue concentration of structures by regulating land, buildings. yards and den- sity of population: to provide for compatibility of different land uses; to provide for the administration of the Ordinance; to provide for amendments; to prescribe penalties for violation of such regulations and to define powers and duties of the City staff, the Board of Adjustment and Appeals, the Planning Commission and the City Council in relation to the Zoning Ordinance. o-~...7The City is divided into land use districts. the boundaries of which are shown (",..e. , on the Zoning Map published as part of this summary. Districts are identified "'.,,;iVt.,j 1)1 on the map in the following manner: . (y , R-1A, R-1B, R-1C, R-1D Single-family Residential R-2A, R-2B, R-2C Single and Two-family Residential R-3A, R-3B Multiple-family Residential R-C Residential/Commercial C-1 Neighborhood Convenience Commercial C-2 Auto-oriented Commercial C-3 General Commercial C-4 Commercial Service L-R Lakeshore Recreational PUD Planned Unit Development s Shore land ID -1- I v .: Maximum building heights, minimum lot size requirements and minimum yard re- quirements (setbacks) for each zoning district are summarized in the Table of Bulk and Dimensional Requirements published as part of this summary. Among other things the Ordinance con~ains provisions and regulations relative to the following: a. Nonconforming structures and uses. b. General building and performance requirements. c. Accessory buildings, uses and equipment. d. Fences. e. Screening and landscaping. f. Performance standards related to traffic visibility, glare, smoke, dust, odors, noise, refuse, exterior storage, waste material, bulk storage, radiation, and electrical emissions. g. Off-street parking and loading. h. Building construction requirements. i. Grading and filling. j. Essential services. k. Signs. 1. Home occupations. m. Development along shorelines. The Ordinance contains rules and procedures for amending the Ordinance and grant- ing variances and conditional use permits. An appeal process is also establish- ed for instances where it is alleged that an error has been made in the enforce- ment of the Ordinance. Public hearings relative to amendments. variances, con- ditional use permits and appeals are required pursuant to statutory requirements. The Ordinance provides for the enforcement of zoning regulations by allowing for the designation of a Zoning Administrator and specifying penalties for the violation of the Ordinance. A complete text of the Zoning Ordinance is available for review in the City offices located at 5755 Country Club Road during regular office hours. {{Xi dJ, --7 -? ... I..J / / ~ ~ ch"'t ~jJ, -2- @ j; .gj i' -.' 8 .-I-< 6 co co co co 0 ~ tIlCO 0 ~ ~N --. --. --. --. N W C""l C""l ! ..... ..... If'') If'') c c c 0 c ..... ..... QiO N ..... N cw ~ >j ) co co co ~ co ~ ~ If'') 0 0 ~ C""l ..... ~ If'') --. --. --. --. 0 ..... c c c c C""l ..... C""l C""l " co co co @ co ~ 0 0 0 0 0 ~ ) N ..... If'') If'') --. --. --. --. N C""l N C""l C""l N ..... C C C 0 C ..... ..... N .... co co co @ co 8 0 0 If'') 0 0 ~ ) N ..... If'') If'') --. --. --. --. N C""l ..... N C""l N ..... C C C 0 C ..... ..... N - i ~N co @ co @ @ N ..... If'') If'') --. --. 8 0 If'') If'') ~ If'') If'') C""l ..... C 0 C If'') N C""l ..... C""l N N ..... 0 ..... ..... ..... @ @ ~ ~ g. 8 q co co r- C""l ..... 0 0 If'') 0 0 co j C""l ..... ~ If'') --. --. N C""l ..... C""l C""l --. b ..... c If'') 0 c . l-< ..... l-< ..... C ..... N ..... ~ N ~ N W W 0 0 @ @ ~ ~ g. 8 :C ..If" co co 0 r- ..... 0 0 If'') 0 0 co j N ..... If'') If'') --. ~ --. ..... N C""l ..... C""l C""l --. b C""l ..... C 0 0 C l-< ..... l-< ..... C N C""l . ~ N Qi ..... ..c: N .I,J w J ~N ~ ~ ~ " N ..... 'li If'') co co if, 0 0 If'') 0 Cll b I --. --. 0 If'') c c ..... ..... ~ ~ co co --. --. If'') 0 c c ..... N ~ ~ co co --. --. ~ 0 c c C""l ~ ctl ctl ctl o~ l:r l:r l:r ...... ~ co co co --. --. --. 0 c c C N ~ co co co --. --. --. 0 c c c C""l ~ co co co --. --. --. ~ c c c co --. j:; C""l ..... 1'-. ~ q " ~ ..If" N ..... If'') If'') C""l ..... o ..... r- 8 ..... ..... C""i C"') ---. c C""l ~ o (J" o N ..... o C""l o ..... o C""l o co C""l --. C ~ b ~N N ..... If'') If'') C""l ..... If'') ..... If'') r--. ~ S ::R ~ ~ If'') IJj C""l ...... ctl l:r -IN N ...... ~ J .... b ~N N ..... If'') If'') C""l ..... co --. c o N ..... Q ~ b ~N N ..... If'') If'') C""l ..... co --. c If'') C""l ..... ~ ~ ~ ~N N ..... If'') If'') C""l ..... I) ..... ,....... ,....... ..J Qi ~ Qi Qi . .w ..... l-< l-< l-< C ~ ::l ::l ::l ::l ..... "-' ::l ..... w w w w ~ J) B B B B "-/ "0 ..... cr ...... ::l tIl tIl tIl :>-, co l-< Qi W W W W W "-/ ...... ..... Q) ..... tIl tIl tIl tIl C ..... w 0.. l-< w ~ co ~ :>-, s:: i 0 ...... Q Qi ...... C Q) ...... ~ co ,....... w co Qi co l-< ..... Q) Q) ~ . tIl 0.. 0 "-' 0.. 0 l-< co ~ ...... ..... l-< ~ ..... tIl ..... tIl ..... Qi 0.. tIl co 0.. Q) ~ tIl C ~ tIl g. W ...... ..... ~ ..... 'p ...... Qi ..... Q) 0 2P w W "-/ .0 ..... U ..... u & ...... ~ ...... ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ l-< ~ W l-< ~ ..... ~ ...... .w 0... ih 0... ...... U) I Qi co :r.: ...... ..... N W N ...... ~ ..... ~ . <:C U) ~ w ...... ,....... ,....... oS ,....... ,....... I=Q co .0 co .0 ~ ,....... ,....... ..... N .. .1' 8 ..... o N ..... If'') C""l o ..... If'') co C""l --. C ~ ~ ...... 8 ..... If'') C""l s ~ If'') co C""l l: o ..... ..... ~ s ~ ~ ~ c 0 ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ co N ..... --. ..... ..... c --;- w ~ ~ . '.-l W ...... W tIl Q) ..... . ~ Cl ~ w Q:: ...... tIl .0 .w ~ 2P tIl W "-' W ~ ~ ~ co "-/ s:: ..... ~ .0 .2 .2 w {j {j w w "-' Qi w w ~ "0 t l-< tIl Qi Qi ~ .~ ..... tIl tIl g. W co 5 ~ l-< ~ .0 w W Q.i co W oS oS i:i: l-< ..... & ..... Qi ..... U) U) U) "0 l-< ,....... ,....... ~ ,....... ,....... ,....... ,....... ,....... U "0 co .0 U "0 Q) ,....... C""l .. I' Qi Qi Qi ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 8 . r I 1.1 . ~ ~~~ ctl l:r tIl tIl tIl ..... ..... ..... {j{i{j "-' "-' "-' 000 555 ..... ..... ..... w w w o..o..g. .g.g"tj co co co fjfjfj 000 w w w l-< l-< l-< 000 ..... ..... ..... l-< l-< l-< 0..0..0.. u w W .-< ...... ...... ..... ..... ..... ::l ::l ::l .0.0.0 . . . tIl tIl tIl ~~~ ,......1.,......1 ....... .0.0.0 l-< l-< l-< 000 "-' "-' "-' w w w Qi Qi Qi Qi Qi Qi "-' "-' "-' If'')OO r- C""l N ~, i' i' -,{ :!~ 'I . . MAYOR Robert Rascop COUNCI L Jan Haugen Tad Shaw Kristi Stover Robert Gagne CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD . SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 . (612) 474-3236 MEMORANDUM TO: PLANNING COMMISSION, MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: BRAD NIELSEN DATE: 14 MARCH 1985 RE: REUTIMAN, R.W. - SIMPLE SUBDIVISION FILE NO.: 405 (85.05) BACKGROUND Mr. Joe Gorecki, representing R.W. Reutiman, has requested approval of a simple subdivision to divide the property located immediately north of the Sullivan Center office building at Lake Linden Drive and Highway 7 (see Site Location Map - Exhibit A, attached). The site contains approximately 88,250 square feet of area. As shown on Exhibit B, the applicant proposes to divide it into two, approximately equal parcels. The property in question is zoned R-C, Residential Commercial and is currently occupied by a single family dwelling. Surrounding zoning and land use are as follows: North: East: South: West: vacant lot, zoned R-3 vacant lot, zoned C-3 Sullivan Center office building, zoned R-C single family dwelling, zoned R-1 ANALYSIS/RECOMMENDATION The applicant's request was discussed on an informal basis at the Planning Commission meeting held on 5 March. At that time it was discussed that the lot sizes were generally acceptable for the R-C zoning district. A preliminary site sketch showing a proposed office building was submitted by the applicant to illustrate that the site could accommodate such a use (see Exhibit C, attached). It should be noted that review and approval of the subdivision request will not constitute approval of the applicant's site sketch. That will require a-5eparate conditional use permit. A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore ./fb-' ~ . . Memo from the Planner R.W. Reutiman Simple Subd. 14 March 1985 page two Relative to the proposed division, two areas of concern have been raised; 1) site access, and 2) site grading. The access issue is based upon the topography of the property in question (see Exhibit 0, attached) and its location on the curve of Lake Linden Drive. The proximity of the proposed access drive to the Sullivan Center driveway is also in question. While our current Ordinance is vague regarding spacing between commercial driveways, the new Zoning Ordinance requires a minimum of 40 feet between driveways. Upon field checking the site, the City Engineer and I have concluded that if the property is to be divided, the City should require that the two new lots be served by a common access drive located approximately at the flat part of the high point on Lake Linden Drive (shown on Exhibit D). Even with one driveway access, the entry will require considerable grading to improve sight lines along the street. The applicant has been asked to provide a detailed grading plan for review by the City Engineer. The grading plan should include the entire site plus everything within 100 feet of the property boundary in order to evaluate how the site will relate to surrounding property. Finally, the grading plan should illustrate how the northerly parcel, which drops over 20 feet from south to north, will be made useable. BJN:pr cc: Dan Vogt Jim Norton Glenn Froberg Sue Niccum Joe Gorecki u :;:) o ID :;:) ..J o . MKtn . I~~' : I I I I 1 , I - - - - - - '- - - - - - - tJ.~ . .. .. .. .. .. .. ---ce,-.,- .. v ~ ,~~ n >= ~ Exhibit A SITE LOCATION Reutiman simple subdivision . - - .------"' . . I e i I ~r \ r 19 \ . ....,..,.. 11011 ~o, ... t' . Proputy I" a&Je~ti"" \ SURVEY FOR' .10. Gor.elli \ P.o 80a 163 . \ . EJClltlllF MN 55331 \ \ ~ SURVEY Of I \ \\ \ \ \ ,\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ I \ 1 I I ,/' I.. : ) /! I ,. ~~~~/~r\-\UI" -SltL ...; /. { I // \'o""~ 0 l;.z ~ ~.100 . ..: I': . I - r-'\ ~ I. I I ~ --- 17 \ ~ . ~/' I . ~ .,' .' .. /1 \ . \ It .' ,.," .'.,~ .. '. . 1 · ~", ~ aft ,. ... .---: 0-0.... · '.' ,,~ ..... ~,...~ fo" NO 1~. ,. ....~.......~...... ... .. _::_-:..~~ \ - ~\GI'I'flICf' ~/~, ~ ,f{\J"I\ ... ~.,....\ ,,, - . S,,~'E. ,., ~. \ 1 ,..--' ~" ~ / T_' aN 110 .islblt .~ent ~ ' from Oft ... tcrid property uce.- -~-- ./' "'-"-.' ......-( /' L toUf1t u. ...... ~ . " .. , " ," . ;~ o. . ~J... Pr"f~"A o."t~1Of\ ! . 'is .. . ., ... c. ..-- '. E] .d" .........;....-- ," ,"'" ~ , ", ... ,~ "- 'Ill/ ,~ l~/ ,~ ^ '\ . . / \ '...' . .. " ""......--..- z ,...., .. .... ~Jj ~ . I . ~ .. 1 .. .. .. ... . \ , . I \ . . . ! . ~ . . . "'-......_ CQUIIn CAST .. IICIIIUIIIIIT ., .. ClIIl _c. M-I"-.I , Lots 16, 17, . ond 18, I.lnden Partl Hennepin CountY. "i"neSlto Subject 10 to..m..... for S.ate Tn"* HI(IIwaJ NumO.r 1 pet Fill Certificat., ODe, No 3439216 Ar.o . 3.17 Ac,"! ~ I S~I. 10' . . Exhibit B PROPOSED DIVISION .. . . t.;. , "~,,',., ../',' , .~}1~ ,~. J~'lrft ,~t;:t' 'l,q~ J . @ o,.".vL . ~ . \..\t\~4f\ V . \ \ ..,,: '... , -. , ..... ",,, ", , ....;. ' '...........'" . , --\; ~ ' - " ' ,"5'<< 1 - ,t .",," i I c ~ ~ , r... _,j.;,',:e.:,''- , ,"'1 '(; \ . '-' ~ ~ .... --. - ' . ~ 114, 'P' , \ \ \ \ I \l , \ " I II /1 I , \ \ , ,I~ \, , I "- --~\ 1\ ,wt .\ · . j; t ~ '. {. : I " .. I .L.' " ~;. , .I} ,. Exhibit C - " ' PRELIMINARY SITE SKEn'CH ~ I I " - / . l ,o.c4 I .--1 II~ -- I J ~. ...~ . . IVV' .._ " \\~ .~, '. '\-. ..... .' " \' '''~ . l\. .'. \_ .' \ Exhibit D RAPHY SITE TOPOG / 1/ ( \ III Yl. . . , DRR.SCHELEN.MAYERoN & ASSOCIATES, INC~ Consulting Engineers Land Surveyors June 18, 1985 City of Shorewood 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, MN 55331 Attn: Mr. Dan Vogt, Administrator Re: Reutiman Simple Subdivision 1174425 Dear Dan: We have reviewed the simple subdivision for the Reutiman Property on Lake Linden Drive. Following are our review comments regarding the simple subdivision and the grading plan: 1. The plan shows two driveway accesses to Lake Linden Drive. Due to the geo- metries of Lake Linden Drive and the marginal sight distance, there should only be one common driveway access. 2. Sanitary sewer is available to the site, but additional sewer stubs may have to be installed to service the property. 3. Municipal water is not available to the sight. 4. Storm sewer is not required on the sight but eventually may be needed in Lake Linden Drive. At that time, the benefitted area will be determined, which this property will be a part of. 5. The grading plan shows .a significant change in relief to accommodate the two building pads. There appears to be some errors in the new contour lines tying into the old contour lines. The developer should review this. Also, the drain- age on-site appears to be trapped in the northwest corner of the property. Relief for this should be incorporated into the grading plan without dumping water onto the adjacent property. Prior to initiating an extensive grading plan like this, we suggest a soil boring be obtained in the building pad site of the north lot. 2021 East Hennepin Avenue . Suite 238 .. Minneapolis, Minnesota 55418 · 612/331-8660 //6 . ~ . . Page Two City of Shorewood June 18. 1985 6. Prior toeny actual fieldwork ora request for a building permit. more detailed plans must be submitted. If you have any questions. please contact our office. Very truly yours. ORR-SCHELEN-MAYERON & ASSOCIATES. INC. C ~.rt!~ City Engineer JPN: n 1 b , . SECTION 420 . PEDDLERS, CANVASSERS AND SOLICITORS 420.01 Definitions subd. 1 Peddler or Solicitor. A peddler or solicitor is a person without a fixed place 0... 'o"lsiness location or residence in the City of J~ ~ who '. travels from house to house or from door to door to offer for sale or sellar peddle, any goods, wares, books, newspapers, magazines, merchandise, insurance, course of instruction, or any other product or service,or to take orders therefor. Peddlers and Solicitors also include any person who sells or offers for sale any goods, wares, or other articles or services of value at any place within the city other than upon land which is owned or leased by such person or at a store kept by said person or at a stand at one of the public markets. Persons who may sell or peddle the products of a farm or garden occupied by him or her are specifically excluded from this subdivision. suba.. 2 Canvasser. A canvasser is a person who travels from house to house or.from door to door to elicit information, conduct polls, provide information, or attempt to influence a persons decision. subd. 3 Person. The term "person" shall include individuals, firms and . corporations. 420.02 Posting sul;>d. 1 Any resident of the City of who wishes to exclude peddlers, s<?licitors, or canvassers including any person who sell~ or offers for sale products of a farm, from premises occupied by him may place on or near the usual entrance to such premises a printed pla~ard or sign bearing the following notice: "Peddlers and canvassers prohibited". Such placard / ~ {>./ , . . shall be no larger than 10 inches wide by 4 inches high and the printing there on shall not be smalle~ than ~ inch. subd. 2 It shall be unlawful for any peddler, canvasser or solicitor including any person who sells or offers for sale products of a farm, within the corporatL 'imits of the City of 1 to enter in or upo~ any premises where such placard or sign is placed and maintained. subd. j It shall be unlawful for any person other than the person occupying such premises to remove, injure or deface said placard or sign. 420.03. Activities prohibited No peddler or solicitor shall sell or offer for sale any goods, wares, services, or other articles of value upon or along the streets or other public place within the City of - 420.04 Nuisance No person shall conduct his business so as to annoy other persons or to become a nuisance or so as to obstruct travel upon any street, alley or public place within the City of No person shall call attention to his merchandise by crying out, by blowing a horn, by ringing a bell, or by any other loud or unusual noise. 420.05 Penalty Any person violating any provision of Section 420 shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. . . ORR-SCHELEN-MAYERON & ASSOCIATES, INC. 2021 E. HENNEPIN AVE. . SUITE 238 MINNEAPOLIS, MINN. 55413 CHANGE ORDER NO. ..... .1. . . . . . . . . $. 28.t299..7.5 . (Deduct) . .V~lley. J?Clvin.gJ, . !n~.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Contractor RE: ... 11-84-2. .. . . . . . . . .8Q50-:-D. Rwy... .lHOl. . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . ShakQpee.. MN. .55379........................... Dear Sir (s) Under your contract dated ... .s.~p~jaJllQef..U. .. .. .. .. .. . .. . .. . .. .. . .. . .. .. 19. .84 with . .Ci.t.)tof. Shorewood.. .. . . .. . . . . .. .. . . . . . . .. . . . ., .. ... . . . . . . ., .. Owner for . .Street. ... . .c;9!1.~t;~~~.~:i-9~. .8:1].". A.p.p1:1~.~~~~~~. .\<!9rk . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . we are authorized by the owner to hereby direct you to .. .delete. f.l:om. pliO:iec~. wor:k.. .. . . .en. Maaor. .Read .the 'EBllowil'l.g'" . .See .attached .li-st. of- 'quantities; . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .................................................0............................................ . ...........................................................................00.............................................................................. 0.0.... ..............................................................0....................... 0........................................................................................ ..................................................................................................... . aad to adIt_ (deduct from) the contract, in accordance with contract aDd specification, the sum of .l:wenty."'7eight. thousand .twP. hundr.ed.nJ.nety...n.ine.and .......~....-...........,..............75/100 Dollars There will be an extension of ....... n . . . .. days for completion. The elate of completion of contract was .11/22 19 ..84 and now will be . ~lt22. .. 19 .84... Amount o' orlglna' contract Tota' Additions Total Deductions Contract to Date $205,211.00 -0- C.O. #1 $28,299.75 $176,911.25 Approved .......................... 19.... Respectfully Submitted, City of Shorewood Owner ORR-SCHELEN-MA YERON & ASSOCIATES, INC. .., h~..f.,.1~......... dames P. Norton t P. E e. .~ Approved .......................... 19.... Per Valley Paving, Inc. Contractor /3" . . ORR-SCHELEN-MA YERON & ASSOCIATES, INC. 2021 E. HENNEPIN AVE. · SUITE 238 MINNEAPOLIS. MINN. 55413 4 CHANGE ORDER NO. ................ $. . . . . . . :-~.-: . . . . . . . . . REil .84.-.5 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . :t<.~Alw ,. .l;I).c,. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. Contractor .1694..... 9.lst .Avenue. NE . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Blaine.. MN. . .55434. . . ., . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Dear Sir (5) Under your contract dated .. ~.~p.t:~JD.Qet'. .1.9. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . .. .. . .. .. . ... 19. .84 with . . Ci.ty . of. .Shor.ewood . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. Owner for . .Sani.tary. . . .Sewer.. Storm .SeweI:,. S.tx:eet. COn.st:r.uc.tiQn........................................... we are authorized by the owner to hereby direct you to .~11. ~~t,~J;l~;i..qt}.. P.~ . t;i.JI\~, . . . . . . . . . . . ...................................................................... 0.0................. "." 0." .............................................................................................. . ............................................................................................... . ud to add to (deduct from) the contract, in accordance with contract and speclflcatloD, the IUlIl of . . . . . . . . . . ":'O~. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. ., . . . . . . .. 1100 Dollars There will be an extension of ... .~9... ..... days for compledon. The elate of completion of contract was .1/ ~.. 19..85 and now will be .8./.1..... 19 .8~... Amount of original contract Total Additions Total Deductions Contract to Date $582,647.65 (.0. #1 $83,611.78 C.o. #1 $4,710.50 ( .0. #2 $ 5,600.00 c.o. #3 $36,243.60 $643,533.33 ( nIl':!. ~1? I;.?~ nn Approved .......................... 19.... Respectfully Submitted, City of Shorewood Owner ORR-SCHELEN-MA '(EION .. .~..:PA~....... ~~orton~"~~. Approved .......................... 19.... . . . . . . . . . . .. . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .0.. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. Per Kenko, Inc. Contractor 131> 4 - . . REC'D JUN 1'7_ ORR.SCHElEN. MAYERON & ASSOCIATES, INC. En(/; ,', Li.'lt)(. 'C':~'-(f' L. JUT.e 14, 19B5 City of Shorewooo 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, Nn. 55331 R~ : Sill,It"f} Sewn, Sturm Sewer, Stret't COilstruc L 01. .nd Appurtenant Work Witfrtord - Project No. 84-5 L'er, t I eme n Enclused .Ie to~r (4; Cj~.Jt-; of Construction PilYll.nl Vouctl.r t!.1. 4- erl the r.ferenc, proJect :n the ""Ilouot of J 62:15.8~. Pie~:e IU~' p'/lbertl in jllluunt of . 5543~ ill your eilrl lest cDn~rnlence. 62115.85 to I<tnit., Ir.(" 1694 - 91st Ai/t. N. Eo, Blain" Mtnnuot.. Vf~! truly yours, ORR -5 CHELfN-f/A i'fRll-J &: ASSUCIATES, INC. /1 ( ~. t~ \ ," ~. _.:. .(.....A_.-:,. ,.. I Jwof. P. Nortor.,P.E. Project Engin'H JPN:RGD EriC IO!iures CC Kenko, Inc. i! 1 L ;('1 ., i~ .4 fV,lj; r- .' 7.. /l{:;f.n !3~ . . ~ Estiaate Voucher No. 4 . CONSTRUCTION AA~fNTVOUCHER. Oate ---------------- Jun. 14. J985 for P,rlod Ending Jun, JO, 1985 ProJect Nu~ber 84-5 ------------------------ ----------------------------- Class 04 Work ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sanitary S,wer, Stor~ S,w.r, Str..t Conltrucllon ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- and Appurten.nt Work To I Kenko, Inc. 1694-91it Av,. N.E. Blain., Mn. 55434 locatIon ---------------------------------------------------.... Water40rd For ------------------------------------------------------ City 04 ShorewOOd, H.nnepin County, H,nn'IDt. A. Original Contract ~ount ------------------------------------------------------ . 582647.65 B. Total Additions ------------------------ . 101839.78 C. Total O.ducttlons ------------------------ . 40954./0 D. Total Funds Encumbered ------------------------ E. Total Value of Work CertifIed to Dat. . 643533.33 . ------------------------- F. less Retained Percentage 346152.91 5 ------------------------ % . 17307.00 G. less Total PrevIous Patmfnts ------------ ------------------------ . 266730.06 H. Approv.d 40r Payment, ThiS Report ------------------------ . 62lJ5.85 1. Total Payqents Including ThiS Voucher ------------------------ . 328845.91 J. Balance Carried Forward ------------------------- APPRlJJAlS . 314687.42 ORR-SCHELftH1AYfR()'~ & ASSOCIATES, W(. ===============-----------============~=====-- ------%-==========.~_.~~=~~--=----~%-------------======----=========== ------------------------- .------------------------------------- Pursuant to our field observation, 4S pertor/led In accordan" With OIJr IIlldr.ct, w. her.by ctrtdy tI,.t th, ".lfrl.ls ire satisfactory and the wor~ pl'l)l'rrl/ perfor~ed In accordanc; "'''~, It" jll,IIS .rod SptctflCatlons .nd n,.t tht tut.1 worK IS 53 % cOOlpl,hd ;as Dt Jun. 10. 19B~ w, htr;br rt'rlVWl.nd p.;n"" of till' vDuclttr. ---------------- -----------------_____6_. Signed --------------------- ------------------- Construction Observer ",,,,, '~="j: }~~l:~_____. hiS IS to certtfl that to the b.st ot II:' knowledge, In40rllat1oll, '11d b.I,.t, th, quantltlf5 and v.luu of work certified herein is a fa,r .pproxlllate estl~ate for th, p,rlod COu,t,d D, thl' vouch.r. ------------------------------------------------------------------.------------------------------------------------------ Con trac tor k.nko, Inc. SI~n'd /3, Dtae : ------------------------------------ ------------------------------------ T, t I, ------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------ 6________________________________________________ City of Shor.wood Vuucher ----________________________________ Checkrd 8y Approv,d 40r Pint.nt ~----------------------------------~---------------- ------------------------------------------------- Date ------------------------------------ Oate Authorlz,d Repr,s.ntitlvt Page of 4 ------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------- 033- 3394 't ~ lIe, the undersigned, DO NOT OBJ~CT to Bernie Whetston running his landscaping business out of his'home at 5835 Eureka Road, Liwoo~=ne f:r ;;;;:.~~~~f _ ~ __JtJLd~-~~~.~ : c6-7BC) b(,fJC/114- ~?2------------ ,~~~]J23 9.11\rk~IJ2L--- ,At), ':-r' . · L I . ~ :...J '/ i:S::,-L"'-"<"~ _.;- w~1 ;II ; ~ ~~_____: .5 7 L/ c E t/ ~ J;-';c /p . R j;:> / ,/dcr~~-_--U2~.~,Eqf~eKf _~-- +' > ~7~---L2)~~.tl~=-~ ~ ;-~--. - 2K.JS1L~@.P"':"_-----__ ---- I _-Lf}LL-~. - r ,.' ,ry]j: rY~::E__.&.f::-VA_U J 't?()O,-~ _ ,\ / . - _ (_ _ 1 1fi1_tJui~.tlht'lJJtddL ;/ I, I' J /r~.._/ -,: /:!) :~;. ~'-.) I .>...../ __ ..',: j ".. ~:;p~/;"'~ Z;t~. J:iii~=~~.~ m.c-1L- ., ~~ ~L '-t D E~ ~ ..i A~J.~ - _~ : ~C?~ ~ efL "', ~'~,~~ : ~tjrS- >FIJ.MA-pr ~_ ~/'7 -f; ~~~,. : :~Q)> 1~~/f':7~,f.[~-.- -H./~c{ -4}:.:'. /p:t; ,~ :;~/~:.S;/~'~;8 ro!d- { ~/ 't' .1 . t;;(1~i~~~d~~~ ~., ~h/(J '1' (f1 ~~: ')'~"?~.- ~) ~,a~~~ ~ U I 25<18S--1f~~ /!fLJI. ~': (). 01 f5~ Jk!,~(t2!/ 7 s~~cJ . '\1~, the undersigned, DO NOT OBJECT to Bernie Whetston running his landscaping business out of his home at 5835 Eureka Road, Shorewood, which he has done for the past 19 years. ~%b s=-_€()R.EtG1~----- __: ~~L2{O Y1tlre.7lJaJAl Lv \ :5?(dLfUA~ t "' 9d-=-_: 'i7(Pg~ -- .] / ,. _~ -' \Jl- /).,.. . i. _ ., _ . . ~ .;- 4 --. - d' - - -- . ;llt/' C::-l-11k.~~~t.~__~ t'6Q1Jfl __-212-'2-LI~~L/1K-/k (( - t~,{ I -----------------------~----- I -------------------------~-------------------------- I ---------------------------~------------------------- I -----------------------~------------------------------- I ---------------------------~-------------------------- I -_._-----------------------~---------------------------- t ---------------------------~------------------------------- I ----------_._----------------~--------_._------------------- I -----------------------------~------------------------------- I -----------------------------~---- I -----------------------------~------------------------------ I ----------------------------~ I --~- I ---_!---_- ... F'N~\ ~ C)~'-',..... lLc. eF- (.~. pARf- G~c.H (~........T1,.c.. ~K Sc.J~) t"" E...~,-&~~...h r _1_ "t........Ot-lS ~~ t\1"'N~NM \' , , . .. - 7 ,_LL :1:.1 .. 71~ SI.. 'ZO' ~- .. ,., . "5.' \ I ,~,"'''''''''''''1 . \ ,., .., . . .. ~ I ~ /'. i'~."'.-' -:--:~ .-l" "-- ~ Ro.'c... - r:iTe<t.._- -'.- ~---' ~ .... ~.... . ~N 5n~ 1 ~l.M, ~. tH 11, - - i ~it....€... Po,", N. OF ~, S-:-.. LA~ ~j'. tN'TI:R.~ Lqjo 1""