The URL can be used to link to this page

102885 CC Reg AgP ~ 0\1 OV ~HOdaH NOISSIWWOJ DNINNV~d .~ ()0 cqoi\. ~f)/dJrT:'" Aq papUO;)as ~f\)V J.:q paMUl uonow Otr 0\1 o 'if (sa+nu1W - gl# o++B) HOO~d aH~ WOHd SHa~~vw oG ~U1+aaw 11;)unoJ ~BTn~aH og (sa+nu1W - Vl# o++B) ~861 'O~ ~aqwa+das - Ma1AaH +a~png o 'if NaDnVH dOJSVH aNDVD Hai\.O~S M'ifHS HOAVW q~N}1 Wd O~:L "~J$ avOH gn~J AH~NnOJ ~~L~ SHagWVHJ ~IJNnOJ ... -.. l .. sa~nNIW dO ~Vi\.OHddV 01 ~~VJ ~~OH og HaA'ifHd aNV aJNVIDa~~v dO aDaa~d ov HaaHO O~ ~~VJ vaN a D v ~ ~86T 'gG HagO~JO 'AvaNOW DNI~aaw ~IJNnOJ Hv~nDaH aOOMaHOHS dO A~IJ, -, ... it.. 'CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MONDAY, OCTOBER 28, 1985 page two 5. PARK COMMISSION REPORT A. B. 6. CORRIDOR STUDY DISCUSSION Mr. Steve Alderson of Met Council (att. 6A - Staff memo) (att. 6B - Draft - Request for Proposal) (att. 6c - Funding Method) 7. SIGN REQUEST - "NO PARKING" SIGN Applicant Greg Smith (att. 7 - Petition) 8. WATER STUDY COMMITTEE RESPONSE (att. 8 - Staff memo) 9. ADOPTION OF P.U.D. ZONING - ROBERT S.C. PETERSON ADDITION (att. 9 - Draft Ordinance) 10. ATTORNEY'S REPORT A. Naegele Litigation B. Murfin Property Purchase Agreement C. Blood Litigation - Request to proceed with clean-up 11. ENGINEER'S REPORT A. Shorewood Oaks Request of Water Extension (att. 11 - Request) B. '- .... .CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MONDAY, OCTOBER 28, 1985 page three 12. ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT A. Insurance Renewal Discussion B. Water Service Request - 23370 Acadeny Ave. Q. ~ rr\UJJ_c-.. _ ~12B - ~\gf/ty of Excelsior) MAYOR'S REPORT . ~ 13. A. B. 14. COUNCIL REPORTS A. Discussion of News Articles B. C. 15. APPROVAL OF CLAIMS 16. ADJOURNMENT v CITY OF SHOREWOOD BUDGET REVIEW MEETING MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 30, 1985 ~ i ~'''.='::tt...t ~ .~~""f"'P.'\t~i*-; ... ~...,.;,; T, .t'~'l.\r""''''~I' , · ,,-,.' ..~. ..t~ C 'UNCIL CHAMBERS 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD 7:30 PM .' , ... / M I NUT E S CALL TO ORDER The Budget Review meeting was called to order at 7:30 P.M. by Mayor Rascop, on Monday, September 30, 1985 in the Council Chambers. ROLL CALL \ Present: Mayor Rascop, Councilmembers Stover, Gagne, Shaw and Haugen. Staff: Administrator Vogt, Finance Director Beck, Public Works Director Zdrazil, Planner Nielsen and Clerk Kennelly. BUDGET REVIEW A list of recommendations from the Water Study Committee was submitted by members Amlau, Fonte, Beal and McNulty (The list of recommendations is herein attached). The Council proceeded to discuss various areas of the recommendations. Gagne and Haugen questioned the services cur- rently being done by Munitech and would like to further evaluate the current services offered. Beal indicated that not all member&were in agreement with all the recommendations within the report, but they did all approve the report. Beal felt that the City could save a lot of money if it is possible to "mothball" some of the existing wells until economically feasible to reopen them. Gagne recommended that this report be turned over to the staff for further study of each of the recommendations, to then be returned to the Council for review. Rascop would like, expenses and revenues report for a two year history submitted to the Water Committee for review. Bridge submitted an update of changes made in the budget thus far, Beck also submitted update, these updates do differ in areas. Stover brought up the issue of salaries among the non union employees. After various calculations were discussed, she recommended a 5% in- crease over current salaries for the 1986 budget. Beal recommended a flat across the board percentage until the budget is worked out. Shaw supported a 2~% increase. Stover will like to see the bud- get submitted with salaries separate and not divided into the individual departments. Stover's motion was denied - 1 aye (Stover) 4 nays. Shaw moved, seconded by Gagne, to set salaries (non-union) at 2~% over 12/31/85 salaries. Motion carried - 4 ayes to 1 nay (Stover). fA BUDGET REVIEW MEETIN~ MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 30, 1985 page two . Council would like to see all 1987 salaries pooled together for review purposes. Stover moved, seconded by Gagne, to remove the $15,000 in the budget for siren purchase. Motion denied - 2 ayes (Stover/Gagne) 3 nays. Council proceeded with a review of Departments #52 through #66. Beal suggested that all conference and schooling costs be removed. Beck returned with calculations on savings of salaries at the 2~% increase level. Rascop moved, seconded by Gagne, to reduce the contingency by $12,833. Motion carried - 3 ayes to 2 nays (Shaw and Haugel). Gagne moved, seconded by Haugen, to direct the staff to draft a final budget for approval at the Council meeting of October 7, 1985. Motion carried - 4 ayes - 1 abstain (Shaw). MURFIN PROPERTY PURCHASE Shaw stated that Murfin may accept $85,000 for his property adjacent to the Public Works garage. Rascop stated that a letter has been sent stating the City's position on this matter. They feel the appraisal figure was proper, Gagne and Stover supported Rascop's position. Shaw will respond the Council's position to Mr. Murfin. ADJOURNMENT Shaw moved, seconded by Haugen, to adjourn the Budget Review meeting of Monday, September 30, 1985 at 10:35 P.M. . Motion carried unanimously. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, SANDRA KENNELLY CITY CLERK MAYOR RASCOP /septembe,r 30, 1985 . . TO: Mayor Rascop & Counci1members From: Shorewood Water Study Committee Re: SHOREWOOD WATER STUDY COMMITTEE REPORT The City of Shorewood presently owns and operates four muni- cipal wells serving approximately 142 residents as part of the Shorewood Municipal ~ater System. These wells serve the de- velopment of Amesbury (98 residents as of March 31, 1985), Boulder Bridge (13 residents), Woodhaven (5 residents), and Badger (26 residents). Additionally, the City of Shorewood processes billings of 72 Shorewood resid~nts who purchase water from the municipal sys- tem in Minnetonka (35), Tonka Bay (6), and Excelsior (31). For numerous reasons, including the small number of users of the over-sized wells, the operating expenses have grossly ex- ceeded the revenue generated from water sales to city well users and other city purchase users by $40,000.00 to $80,000.00 per year since 1981. After many hours of careful study*, we recommend the following: 1. A city-wide municipal water system is not warranted at this time. 2. Expand, on a totally voluntary basis present well systems which are within a reasonable range of becoming self-~uporting. 3. The city should temporarily abandon those city wells which significantly contribute to the operating deficit and in their place provide individual wells. 4. Increase water rates to city water users and city water purchasers a reasonable amount to help reduce the operating deficit. 5. Establish a dedicated repair and replacement fund for the wells. 6. Establish a policy that all future wells in which the city is involved be structured with developers to assure no operat- ing deficit for the city at any time during the life of the we 1'1. *All data utilized was provided by the City of Shorewood. . 2 . . 7. Develop a water utility commission to oversee water system management, water system development and the dissemination of information to the public on water. 8. Reexamine the need for Nunitech to service wells and in- vestigate other options for maintenance of the wells. 9. The cost accounting for city wells should be on a per well basis and costs for water purchase users from other cities should be kept separately. 10. Any developer would have the option of repurchasing the well serving his development if he wished to have that develop- ment remain on a central water system. He would then be respon- sible for total costs of maintaining this system, and would guarantee the city would never incurr costs from it in the future. Respectfully submitted: Jim Beal (Approved 9-29-85) Michael Fonte (Approved 9-29-85) C. L. Amlaw (Approved 9-29-85) Jim McNulty (Approved 9-29-85) v CITY OF REGULAR MONDAY, l / ' CO~IL CHAMBERS 5755 COUNTRY CLUB 7:30 PM - SHOR~WOOD ~ COUNCIL MEETING OCTOBER 7, 1985 ROAD M I NUT E S CALL TO ORDER The regular meeting of the Shorewood City Council was called to order by Mayor Rascop at 7:30 P.M., Monday, October 7, 1985 in the City Hall Council Chambers. Rascop then turned the meeting over to Acting Mayor Shaw due to a loss of voice. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE AND PRAYER Mayor Rascop opened the meeting with the Pledge of Allegiance and a prayer. ROLL CALL Present: Mayor Rascop, Councilmembers Haugen, Shaw, Stover and Gagne. Staff: Attorney Froberg, Engineer Norton, Administrator Vogt and Clerk Kennelly APPROVAL OF MINUTES REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING - SEPTEMBER 23, 1985 Gagne moved, seconded by Haugen, to approve the minutes of the Regular Council meeting of September 23, 1985 as corrected within the "Police Committee Update Report". Motion carried unanimously- 5 ayes. BUDGET REVIEW MEETING - SEPTEMBER 18, 1985 Gagne moved, seconded by Shaw, to approve the minutes of the Budget meeting of September 18, 1985 as written. Motion carried unani- mously - 5 ayes. BUDGET REVIEW MEETING - SEPTEMBER 25, 1985 Haugen moved, seconded by Gagne, to approve the minutes of the Budget Review meeting held September 25, 1985 as written. Motion carried unanimously - 5 ayes. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR Haugen directed Planner Nielsen to contact owner of the property at 5200 St. Albans Bay Road in reference to a violation of the Junk Ordinance. She would also like staff to check on hanging branches over the road at 5225 St. Albans Bay Road. /13 COUNCIL MINUTES MONDAY, OCTOBER 7, 1985 page two . . CONSENT AGENDA PARK COMMISSION MEMBER APPOINTMENT - CAROLYN SQUIRES Council appointed Carolyn Squires of 5800 Christmas Lake Road to fill the vacancy on the Park Commission previously held by Carol Butterfield. The appointment was recommended by the Park Commission. This term to expire 12/31/85. PROJECT #85-2 - PAYMENT VOUCHER - ALLIED BLACKTOP COMPANY Payment Voucher #1 and Final in the amount of $45,400.72 to Allied Blacktop Company for seal coating, Project #85-2. VIDEO UPDATE - COMMERCIAL BUILDING PERMIT A request to remodel the Video Update at 19465 State Highway #7. All alterations to be made totally within the confines of the exist- ing building. SIGN PERMIT - 6000 CHASKA ROAD A sign permit has been requested by Peggy Sheldon for her Commercial Office Building located at 6000 Chaska Road. The sign meets all setbacks and conforms with the requirements of the R-C District. Haugen moved, seconded by Gagne, to grant approvals for the herein listed requests on the Consent Agenda. Motion carried unanimously- 5 ayes. PUBLIC HEARING - ACCEPTANCE OF DELINQUENT UTILITY ROLLS DELINQUENT SEWER UTILITY - LEVY #9898 DELINQUENT WATER UTILITY - LEVY #ge99 RESOLUTION NO. 79 -85 RESOLUTION NO. 79A~E5 The Public Hearing was opened at 7:40 P.M. by acting Mayor Shaw to pass on the acceptance of the delinquent public utility rolls, as submitted, for the purpose of certification of allowing balances, to the 1986 payable tax statements. Calling for public comment and receiving none, Shaw closed the public hearing at 7:42 P.M. Gagne moved, seconded by Haugen, to adopt the delinquent utility roll as submitted. Adopted by Roll Call Vote - 5 ayes. Clerk Kennelly informed the Council of a large overdue Commercial sewer and water account, and questioned whether the Council may want to set policy to prevent this in the future. Council discussed the legality of turning off water to a Commercial establishment when the past due balance exceeds $500.00. Shaw moved, seconded by Stover, to direct the Administrator to contact ~he.delinquent party (Country Kitchen) requesting payment and to lndlcate to them that a policy will be enacted to prevent further large delinquencies. Motion carried - 5 ayes. COUNCIL MINUTES ... MONDAY, OCTOBER 7, ~5 page three . PUBLIC HEARING - ACCEPTANCE OF DELINQUENT UTILITY ROLLS - continued Stover moved, seconded by Gagne, to give commendations to Clerk Kennelly for her expediance in the certification process. Motion carried. PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT Stover reviewed the proposed request to build an office building at 5405 St. Albans Bay Road by Gene Rosenthal. This will require rezoning. The Council will receive this proposal at a later date. PARK COMMISSION REPORT Commissioner Jakel reported on the previous park meeting and presented their requests. He indicated that the free grading project for Free- man Park has been cancelled by the contractor. The Commission would like to have Public Works Director Zdrazil obtain bids on the replace- ment of Cathcart Hockey Rink, cost not to exceed $5000. They would like to demolish Manor Park warming house due to its poor condition with some type of replacement scheduled for this spring. They would like a fire ring installed in Manor at this time, cost not to exceed $100. The Commission has received a request to accept a small triangle of land on Excelsior Boulevard for possible park use. The suggested property donation came from the Watterberg Estate. The Commission felt that it was not appropriate for park use due to its size, topography and location. The Commission would like to be contacted prior to any storage or dumping of material in City Parks in the future. Gagne moved, seconded by Haugen, to approve the expenditure from the Park Fund in the amount of $5000 for a new hockey rink at Cathcart and a fire ring in an amount not to exceed $100 for Manor Park. Motion carried - 5 ayes. Gagne moved, seconded by Rascop, not to allow any further dumping of material by the City in City Parks without the approval of the Administrator. Motion carried - 5 ayes. Gagne moved, seconded by Haugen, to authorize the removal of the warming house at Manor Park. The Administrator was directed to obtain information on the best means of removal and return to the Council with his determination. Motion carried - 5 ayes. POSTPONEMENT - PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT Haugen reported that E. G. Rosenthal has requested a postponement of his proposal for a Comp Plan amendment until he has had the oppor- tunity to discuss his plans at a joint meeting with the neighboring property owners. COUNCIL MINUTES ~ MONDAY, OCTOBER 7, 1985 page four ~ SIMPLE SUBDIVISION AND VARIANCE RESOLUTION NO. 80-85 SHENEHON/GOODLUND - 52e5 SHADY ISLAND ROAD Rascop moved, seconded by Stover to approve the simple subdivision and the lot area variance and side lot line variances subject to the Planner's recommendations listed in his report dated 9/30/85. Stover added an amendment to omit the utility easements dedication on the lake side, amendment accepted by Rascop. Prior to the Council vote, Mr. Shenehon stated his objections to the granting of a 15' easement for additional road right-of-way. He felt that the property across the street should be forced to grant additional right-of-way at this time. Nielsen explained that the City had the authority to obtain needed right-of-way when subdivisions or variances are requested. Mr. Shenehon did not feel he should be required to pay a park fund dedication because the Shady Island Association had already donated land to the parks. He also estimated what he felt the value of the property dedicated for easement totaled. He felt the 30 day filing date was not sufficent because of the time it may take from he and his sister to determine an equitable financial agreement due to this division. Rascop amended his motion to allow a 60 day filing date, accepted by Stover. Motion carried by roll call vote - 5 ayes. SHENEHON PETITION OF REZONING - SHADY ISLAND Mr. Shenhon submitted a new petition supporting the rezoning of Shady Island to R-l C instead of R-1B as previously submitted by petition. He felt that there was some misunderstanding of the previous petition and would like the petition submitted in consideration prior to final adoption of the new zoning Ordinance (All copies of petition herein attached). Haugen moved, seconded by Stover, to submit Mr. Shenehon's petition to the Planning Commission for further study. Motion carried - 5 ayes. 1986 BUDGET APPROVAL RESOLUTION NO. 78-85 Stover moved, seconded by Haugen, to reconsider the amount allocated for the police budget. Motion carried - 5 ayes. Stover moved to delete $4,717 from the Police budget, reducing their budget total to $287,254, seconded by Haugen. Motion carried - 4 ayes - 1 nay (Rascop). Shaw moved to reconsider non-union city staff salaries, Haugen seconded for discussion. Motion carried - 5 ayes. COUNCIL MINUTES OCTOBER 7, 1985 page five . . 1986 BUDGET APPROVAL - continued Haugen suggested adding $4717 to non-union salaries only. Council tried to determine actual percentage of increase for salaries. Co~ncil suggested that the money be placed into a contingency fund until final figures can be determined. Stover supports the Admini- strator determining the amounts of raises to go into each department. Motion to increase non-union employee salary allocation by $4717 carried - 4 ayes - 1 nay (Rascop). . Stover suggested spreading the cost of the civil defense siren over 2 years. Rascop felt the police chief should have the opportunity to explain the need for the siren at this time. The current budget total to be taxed to general tax, water fund and special assessment fund is $1,209,261 which represents an approximate 24.24 mill rate. Haugen moved, seconded by Gagne, to adopt the 1986 Budget figure at $1,209,261 and instruct the Administrator to certify that amount. Motion carried by Roll Call Vote - 5 ayes. MURFIN PROPERTY PURCHASE Shaw reported that Mr. Murfin is willing to sell the property adjacent to the City garage for the afforded $65~000, he will not be responsible for the removal of the oil storage tanks at that price. Attorney Froberg felt the Fire Marshall will hold the owner of the property responsible for the removal. It is between Mr. Murfin and I.C.O., the owner of the tanks and renter of the property to remove tanks. Gagne moved, seconded by Haugen, 'to instruct the Attorney to submit a purchase agreement at $65,000 with the responsibility of the removal of tanks and any polluted ground be the total responsibility of the present owner. Motion carried - 5 ayes. CERTIFICATION OF WATERFORD - PROJECT #84-5 - ASSESSMENT ROLLS Engineer Norton submitted a report dated October 7, 1985 reviewing the total costs of improvements for the Waterford Project 84-5. The Waterford Addition has a total assessment of $1,270,198.50 and a separate amount of $36,703.80 for improvements to Covington Vine Ridge. These two totals represent the total cost of the Waterford project cost. These costs must be certified to the assessment rolls and submitted to Hennepin County by October 10, 1985 for the spread to the 1986 payable taxes Costs within this report were reviewed by staff and Mr. Robert Mason in an October 3rd meeting. Mr. Mason and all other property owners have agreed to these figures and have waived the need on an assessment hearing. COUNCIL MINUTES OCTOBER 7, 1985 page six . . CERTIFICATION OF WATERFORD - PROJECT #85-5 - ASSESSMENT ROLLS - cont. Engineer Norton stated that there has been over-run costs to exceed the bonds issued. Council discussed various manners of covering the cost over-runs. Gagne moved, seconded by Haugen, to have developer pay over-runs in cash. Norton explained that traffic study costs along with a number of other items were included in the total project costs but were never included in the bond totals. He also indicated that some of the monies will not be expended until next year and the overages are covered by the assessments to be levied. Motion was withdrawn. Rascop would like to see interest charged on any money expanded by the City for the project prior to receipt of bond money. CHANGE ORDER #7 APPROVAL Rascop moved, seconded by Gagne, to approve Change Order #7 as re- commended by Engineer in the amount of $25,476.88. Motion carried- 5 ayes. RESOLUTION NO. 81-85 WATERFORD ADDITION ASSESSMENT ROLLS Gagne moved, seconded by Haugen, to accept and certify the assessment in the amount of $1,270,198.55 to the Waterford Addition. Motion carried - 5 ayes - by Roll Call Vote. COVINGTON VINE RIDGE ASSESSMENT ROLLS RESOLUTION NO. 82-85 Haugen moved, seconded by Gagne, to accept and certify the assessment rolls in the amount of $36,703.80 to the Covington Vine Ridge Addition. Motion carried by Roll Call Vote - 5 ayes. ATTORNEY'S REPORT BLOOD VIOLATION UPDATE The warrant has not been issued to date. A letter has been sent listing all items on the property to be removed. NAEGELE LITIGATION Council broke for an Executive Session to discuss litigation at 10:10 P.M. and returned at 10:24 P.M. PLANNER'S REPORT KOEHNEN PLUMBING VIOLATION Municipal water was hooked up to Mr. Koehnen's house at 23690 Gil- lette Curve on October 1, 1985. ORDINANCE DRAFT - ROBERT S.C. PETERSON ADDITION Postponed to next agenda. COUNCIL MINUTES MONDAY, OCTOBER 7, 1985 page seven . . ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT APPOINTMENT OF BOOKKEEPER - KATHLEEN SCHWANKL Gagne moved, seconded by Rascop, to appoint Kathleen Schwankl to the bookkeeping position as recommended by Administrator. CONCERNED CITIZEN'S MEMBER SITED FOR PROFESSIONAL MISCONDUCT Gagne read aloud a Minneapolis Star and Tribune article dated October 4, 1985 siting Concerned Citizen's member James V. Beal for various acts of professional misconduct resulting in a suspen- sion of the right to practice law. He suggested that all corres- pondence from this committee no longer be responded to. He also felt that the Water Study Committee of which Mr. Beal is a member, may no longer have a need at the current level and should be abolished. MAYOR'S REPORT DNR INFORMATION A letter from the DNR dated September 26, 1985 losted additional possible lake access locations, of which, 3 sites are now listed in Shorewood. A meeting will be held October 22, 1985 at 7:30 P.M. at Shorewood City Hall for the Lake Minnetonka Lake Area Mayors. COUNCIL REPORTS TRANSPORTATION MEETING Haugen will attend the upcoming Transportation meeting. Rascop directed her to request reimbursement of Shorewood's levied funds by withdrawing from the Metro Transit District. REVENUE COMMITTEE MEETING Council directed the Administrator to attend the Revenue Committee meeting that will discuss the fiscal disparities formula. POLICE COMMITTEE MEETING Haugen and Shaw attended the latest Police Committee meeting where a new draft of the joint powers agreement was submitted. This agreement was drawn by the current and previous Mayors of the City of Greenwood. Shaw will do a comparison with the present agreement and determine the areas of change. The contract calls for a 25 year contract period based on usage after a five year history can be established. Committee would like to see, in writing, the guarantee given to continue a joint powers police department from the City that will house the current department. Rascop suggested that Shorewood be given 2 votes on the Committee when it is paying 50% or more of the police budget. COUNCIL MINUTES MONDAY, OCTOBER 7, 1985 page eight . . APPROVAL OF CLAIMS AND ADJOURNMENT Haugen moved, seconded by Gagne, to adjourn the Regular Council meeting of October 7, 1985 subject to approval of claims for payment, at 11:10 P.M. Motion carried unanimously - 5 ayes. General Fund Acct. #00166-02 Liquor Fund - Acct. #00174 Checks 31113-31187 Checks 3915- 4008 = $238,600.78 $ 63,330.00 Respectfully submitted, Sandra L. Kennelly City Clerk Mayor Rascop CHECK NO. 31113 31114 31115 31116 31117 31118 31119 31120 31121 31122 31123 31124 31125 31126 31127 31128 31129 31130 31131 31132 31133 31134 31135 31136 31137 31138 31139 31140 31141 31142 31143 31144 31145 31146 31147 31148 31149 31150 31151 31152 31153 31154 31155 31156 31157 31158 31159 31160 31161 31162 31163 31164 31165 GENERAtltUND -BILLS PAID SINCE OCTOBER ~1985 TO WHOM PAID Frederick-Sherry Off. Supply Allied Blacktop Co. a\lbinsoT' AmeriaData Arts-Way Associated Asphalt, Inc. Astleford International, Inc. Bob's Personal Coffee Servo Chaska Parts Service Driskill's Super valu City of Excelsior Rolf Erickson Hennepin Cty Treasurer Itasca Equip. Co. Kelly Services Key Leasing, Inc. LMCIT Leef Long Lake Ford Trac" Inc. Froberg & Penberthy, P.A. M & M Auto Body Rebuild. Matthias, Reebke & Maiser Metropolitan Waste Control Minneapolis Star & Tribune Minnesota Mutual Life Void City of Mound WM. Mueller & Sons Inc. Navarre Hardware NSP Orr-Schelen-Meyeron & Assoc. Pitney Bowes Judy Quaas Reynolds Welding Supply Co. SLMPSD The Standard Register Co. Tonka Auto & Body Supply Victoria Repair & Mfg Warning Lites of MN, Inc. Weekly News, Inc Ziegler Inc. Void M-V Gas Co. SLMPSD Frederick-Sherry Off. Supply Larry Samuelson Void Void Void Evelyn Beck Charles Davis Sandra Kenne lly Susan Niccum PURPOSE Typewriter stand, Desk-Planning Insp. Const. Pay. voucher NO.1 & final Planning supplies Hardware/ software -Utility billing Equip. maintenance Road Mix Equip. Maintenance CoffeE Equip. Maintenance Food for budget meeting 4th Qtr. Fire contract Assessing Supplies Board & Room Equip. Maint. Temp. Help - Kathy Schwankl Lease Purchase - copier Oct '85 Employee Health Ins. Laundry Service Equip. Purchase/Maintenance Sept. '85 Legal Fees Paint Work - Ford PU Financial Statements - July '85 Sewer Servo Charges - Sept Advertisement Employee Life Ins. - Oct. '85 Void 4th Qtr. '85 Fire Contract Road Mix Small tools, door lock Lift stat., street lights, etc. City Eng/water request/Kord./SE Water Qtrly Meter Rental/4tb Qtr. '85 Cleaning - City Hall Equip Maint Aug. Jail booking fee Utility Billing Supplies Fuel Filter/shop supplies Small tools 4 Barracades w/flashers Legal Notices Equip. Maint. Void Gas - Warming house-Cathcart Park Oct. '85 Budget Typing Table & chair - Finance Dept Subd. Appl. Refund Void Void Void 80 hrs 80 hrs 80 hrs 80 hrs continued, next page...... AMOUNT 239.98 45,400.72 29.13 1,063.00 90.96 1,930.16 32.39 24.00 67.86 9.78 10,573.25 93.44 384.00 89.17 838.50 223.30 1,827.76 231. 77 1,016.28 2 , 71 9 . 00 107.50 325.00 20,370.69 101. 40 156.36 O. 1,052.94 144.59 80.00 816.38 2,256.96 41. 25 84.00 825.00 139.60 354.93 63.79 30.00 230.00 93.28 22.43 O. 304.00 22,369.50 319.98 140.37 O. O. O. 832.95 535.33 584.87 390.16 ~ page two CHECK NO. 31166 31167 31168 31169 31170 31171 31172 31173 31174 31175 31176 31177 31178 31179 31180 31181 31182 31183 31184 31185 31186 31187 . . GENERAL FUND - BILLS PAID SINCE OCTOBER 7, 1985 TO WHOM PAID Bradley Nielsen Dan Randa 11 Void Kathleen Schwankl Howard Stark Daniel Vogt Ralph Wehle Don Zdrazil Wendy Moldenhauer Patricia Ray Evelyn Beck Bradley Nielsen Dennis Johnson Minnetonka State Bank Commissioner of Revenue State Treasurer State Treasurer - PERA NSP Dept. of Rev. - Petrol. Div. City-County Credit Union Void Norwest Bank PURPOSE 80 hrs 82 hrs Void 40 hrs 80 hrs 80 hrs 82 hrs 80 hrs 3 hrs 80 hrs Mileage Mileage 80 hrs Oct. 13 payroll - FWH Oct. 13 payroll - SWH Oct. 13 payroll - F.I.C.A Oct. 13 payroll - PERA Street lights/lift station Renewal of Fuel Tax License Howard Stark/Brad Nielsen Void Sew Imp Series B 11-1-72 AMOUNT 715.55 586.08 0.0 247.64 549.93 852.07 586.08 764.23 22.50 480.91 42.67 98.61 574.33 1,276.00 580.00 1,521.46 890.23 19.18 10.00 ~2.00 0.0 109,083.60 238,600.78 " CHECK NO. 3915 3916 3917 3918 3919 3920 3921 3922 3923 3924 3925 3926 3927 3928 3929 3930 3931 3932 3933 3934 3935 3936 3937 3938 3939 3940 3941 3942 3943 3944 3945 3946 3947 3948 3949 3950 3951 3952 3953 3954 3955 3956 3957 3958 3959 3960 3961 3962 3963 3964 3965 3966 LIQUOR FU~ BILLS PAID SINCE OCTOBER 7, ~ TO WHOM PAID Void Harry Niemela Old Dutch Foods, Inc Pogreba Distributing, Inc Day Distributing Co. Mark VII Dist. Pepsi Cola Bottling North Star Ice Jude Candy & Tobacco Minn. Suburban Newspaper Thorpe Dist. Co. Quality Wine & Spirits Minn. Bar Supply Minnegasco Ed. Phillips & Sons Griggs, Cooper & Co., Johnson Bros. Wholesale Twin City Wine Co. Intercontinental Pkgs Co. Prior Wine Co. Paustis & Sons BellBoy Corporation NSP LMCIT Minn. Mutual Life Ins. Harry Niemela Sun Communities Dir. East Side Beverage Co. Tombstone Pizza Corp Safety & Security/3M Nelson Enterprises Ed. Phillips & Sons Rex Distributing Co. Royal Crown Beverage Co. Eagle Wine Co. Void Prior Wine Co. Quality Wine & Spirits G. & K. Services Twin City Wine Co. Thorpe Dist. Co. Griggs, Cooper & Co. Johnson Bros. Wholesale Coco-Cola Bottling Intercontinental Pkg. Co. Susan Culver Void Rob Nash Ross Nasset Chris Schmid Don Tharalson Stephen Theis PURPOSE AMOUNT Void Payment for Real Estate Taxes Misc Purchase Beer purchases Beer purchases Beer Purchases Pop purchases Misc purchases Cigarette & Misc purchases Advertising & sales promotioh Beer purchases Wine purchases Misc purchases Utili ties Wine purchases Liquor purchases Wine purchases Wine purchases " 0.0 656.70 97.90 4,285.45 3,128.65 3,195.05 272.35 211.85 2,408.56 643.72 2,717.70 296.95 83.55 166.26 1,155.40 2,612.82 2,241.93 781.19 573.03 212.14 122.56 7,074.60 374.60 230.51 35.29 189.30 346.00 3,406.50 7.75 219.65 235.50 429.29 62.50 32.40 386.39 0.0 297.78 2,785.54 48.80 292.75 3,394.25 2,789.00 1,167.92 408.64 256.19 3.93 0.0 51.00 29.75 121.38 147.00 95.55 " " Liquor purchases Utili ties Oct '85 Marron/Young Employee Life Ins. Payment for Real Estate Taxes Advertising & sales promotion Beer purchases Misc purchases Burglar alarm Wine Purchases " Beer purchases Pop purchases Wine purchases Void Wine purchases Liquor purchases Laundry Service Wine purchases Beer purchases Liquor purchases Wine purchases Pop purchases Wine purchases 3.5 hrs void 12 hrs 7 hrs 29.5 hrs 32.5 hrs 21 hrs ContinuAd on npxt nRpP........... , page two CHECK NO. 3967 3968 3969 3970 3971 3972 3973 3974 3975 3976 3977 3978 3979 3980 3981 3982 3983 3984 3985 3986 3987 3988 3989 3990 3991 3992 3993 3994 3995 3996 3997 3998 3999 4000 4001 4002 4003 4004 4005 4006 4007 4008 LIQUOR F~ - BILLS PAID SINCE OCTOBER 7~85 TO WHOM PAID John Josephson Bill Josephson Susan Latterner Steven Maeger Chris Meyer Todd Ogin Stewart Peterson Void Void Russ Marron Dean Young City of Shorewood Minnetonka State Bank Void Commissioner of Revenue Void State Treasurer FICA State Treasurer PERA State Treasurer PERA City Beer Disb. Co. Minn. Bar Supply Co. Quality Wine & Spirits Ed. Phillips & Sons Intercontinental Pkg Co. Quality Wine & Spirits Void AT&T BellBoy Corporation City of Shorewood Eagle Wine Co. Griggs, Cooper & Co. Johnson Bros. Wholesale Jude Candy & Tobacco Minn. Suburban Newspapers Minnegasco Nelson Enterprises Ed. Phillips & Sons Prior Wine Co. Quality Wine & Spirits Service Sales Corp. Twin City Wine Co. Cash Register Sales PURPOSE AMOUNT 35 hI's 80 hI's 39.5 65.5 hI's 31.5 hI's 11. 5 hI's 16.5 hI's Void Void 80 hI's 80 hI's Aug - Bookkeeping October 13 Payroll - FWH Void Oct. 13 Payroll - SWH Void Oct 13 Payroll - FICA John Josephson Oct 13 Payroll - PERA Beer purchases Misc. purchases Liquor/Wine/Beer purchases Wine Purchases Beer purchases Wine purchases Void Utili ties Liquor purchases Sept. Bookkeeping Wine purchases Liquor purchases Wine purchases Cigarette purchases Advert. & Sales promotion Utili ties Liquor/Wine purchases Wine/Liquor purchases Wine purchases Liquor/Wine purchases Misc. Purchases Wine purchases Cash Reg. Tape 116.11 504.80 150.87 265.79 136.33 48.88 75.08 0.0 0.0 439.70 429.70 263.52 258.00 0.0 108.00 0.0 267.16 224.24 156.33 14.30 229.05 237.55 202.16 55.98 103.79 0.0 12.66 2,135.50 221.51 222.96 2,399.44 307.13 182.37 67.74 166.80 59.86 597.13 594.69 1,189.66 26.64 37.41 37.64 63.330.00 !t . . .. ORR.SCHElEN. MAYERON & ASSOCIATES, INC. Consulting Engmeers LJf7d Surveyors October 22, 1995 City D~ S~or~~ood 5755 Co~ntry Club Road ShC'~~~Dd. Ninn~sota 55331 Re : Grading and Appurtenant Uork Project No. 84-56 G~i", t 1 ~ffiH, : Enclos~d ilre four (4) corlies of CNlstruct ion PiltmPrlt Voucher- No.3 ilnd Final on the referHc~d oroject in the ~DUr.t of S 14117.45. ?ursuant to our field obs~rvation, as perfor~ed in accordance ~ith our contract , ~e hereby certify that the ~ateriills are satisfactory and the work properly ~erforBed in accordance with the olans and specifications. Upon receipt of affidavit, State of Minnesota For~ 134, and also Receipt and Waiver of LIen Rights frat Wang.rin, Inc., pleas. ~ak. pa~.nt to Wangerin, Inc., 8610 Harri.t Av.. So., BloOBington, Minnesota 55420 at your earl iest convenience. Very truly yours, , OP.R-SCY~LEN-MAYERON & ASSO:1ATES, INC. ~~7r? !l(~ \1rJes P. Norton,P.E. Project Engin.er JPN:RGD Enclosures cc : Wangerin, Inc. 2021 East Hennepin Avenue . Suite 238 . Minneapolis, Minnesota 55413 · 612/331- 86603A , , J Estinat. Vouch.r No. 3 & Final . CCt~STRUCTllJ4 PAYMOO VOUCHER. Oah Octob.r 22, 1985 For Ptriod Ending S.pt.nb.r 31, 1985 ----------------------------- ------------------------ Proj.ct Nunb.r 84-56 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Class of Work Grading and Appurt.nant Work ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------ To : Yang.rin, Inc. 8610 Harri.t Au.. So. 8loD'ington, Hn. 55420 (612) 8S8-8B80 Location ------------------------------------------------------ For City of Shor.~ood, H.nn'Din County, Minn.sota ------------------------------------------------------ A. Original Contract Amount t 232900.00 B. Total Additions t 2487.80 C. Total D.ductions t 0.00 ------------------------ D. Total Funds Enc~~ber.d t 235387.80 ------------------------- E. Total Valu. of Work C.rtified to Oat. $ 282349.05 ------------------------ F. Less R.tained Percentage o i. $ o.oe ------------------------ G. Less Total Pr.vious Pa~ents $ 268231.60 ------------------------ H. Approved for Pa~.nt, This Report $ 14117.45 ------------------------ I. Total PaYm.nts Including This Voucher $ 282349.05 ------------------------- J. Balane. Carri.d Forward $ -46961.25 ------------------------- APPROVALS ORR-SCHELEN~YERON & ASSOCIATES, INC. -------------------------------------- Pursuant to our fi.ld"obs.ruation, as perform.d in accordance ~ith our contract, ~e h.r.by c.rtify that th. Baterials art satisfactory and th. ~ork prop.rly p.rform.d in accordanc. ~ith th. plans and sDecifications and that th. total ~ork is 100 i. calpl.t.d as of September 31, 1985 . Ye hereby r.c~.nd paym.nt of this uoucher. ---------------- ------------------------------- ~ L:> ' Sign.d : Sign.d :\!'~ I. If(--:.?~,:;,,' ---------------------------------------- --~--------------------------------- Cons true t i on Obsfru.r . ,/ / -" ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This is to Ctrtify that to th. but of IIY knlMhdg., inforllation, and b.lief, tll. quantiti.s and valuts of ~ork c.rtifi.d h.rein is a fair approximat. .stillat. for th. p.riod cover.d by this uouch.r. Contractor : Wang.rin, Inc. Sign.d By ------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------- Oat. : Tith ------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------- City of Shor.~ood Approv.d for PayQ.nt Vouch.r ------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------- Ch.ck.d By : Authoriz.d R.pr.s.ntatiut ------------------------------------ Oat. Datt ------------------------------------------------- ------------------- Pagt 1 of 033-339. .1 . . ICtL U Uli I 9 19fjbJ \ ORR.SCHELEN. MAYERON & ASSOCIATES. INe. Consulting Engineers Land Surveyors Octob.r 8, 1985 City of Shore~ood 5755 Country Club ROid Shore~ood, Mn. 55331 R. : Sanitiry Se~'r, Storm S~.r, Str..t Construction and Appurt,nint York Yit,rford - Proj,ct No. 84-5 G,ntl""n : Enclosed art four (4) copi,s of Construction Piym,nt Vouch.r No.8 on the reference project in the ~ount of $ 18697.68. Pleas. make payment in ~ount of $ 55434 it your earli.st convenienc.. 18697.68 to Kenko, Inc., 1694 - 91st Ave. N. E., 8Iiin., Hinnesoti Very truly yours, ORR-SCHELEN-NAYERON & ASSOCIATES, INC. J--- f? lJ~ J~es P. Norton,P.E. Project Enginttr . JPN:RGD . Ene I osurn : cc : Kenko, Inc. 2021 East Hennepin Avenutt. Suite 238 · Minneapolis, Minnesota 55413 · 612/331- 8660 313 Estimit. Vouch.r No. 8 . - . t;I tt.IIJ\,j ClJiSTRUCT I lJi PAYMENT VOUCHER. ,. Dit. Octob.r 8, 1985 For P.riod Ending S.pttmb.r 30, 1984 Proj.ct Numb.r 84-5 --------_______________________________________________________________4_______________________________ Cl us of Work Sinitiry S.~.r, Storm St~tr, Str..t Construction ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Loution and Appurt.nant Work To: K.nko, Inc. ------------------------------------------------------ 1694-91st Au.. H.E. Wat.rford Blain., Hn. 55434 ------------------------------------------------------ For City of Shore~ood, H.nn.pin County, Minnesota ------------------------------------------------------ A. Original Contract Anount f 582647.65 B. Total Additions f 128271.46 C. Total D.ductions f 40954.10 D. Total Funds Encumbtr.d f 669965.01 E. Total Valu. of Work C.rtifi.d to Dati f 613153.89 F. L.ss R.tain.d P.rctntag. 5 x f 30657.00 6. L.ss Total Prtvious Payments f 563799.21 H. Approved for Payment, This R.port f 18697.68 I. Total Piymtnts Including This Vouch.r f 582496.89 J. Balanc. Carried For~ard f 87468.12 APPRl1JAI.S ORR-SCHElEN-HAYERON & ASSOCIATES, INC. Pursuant to our field observation, as performtd in accordanc. ~ith our contract, ~. h.r.by c.rtify that th. mat.rials art satisfactory and th. ~ork prop.rly p.rform.d in accordinc. with th. plans and sp.cifications and that th. total _I i. __~~____X c..,I.I.d.s of ~~~!'~~___. '" hmb, "'r:.d ''''''f[ ;.:; ,ouch.., Sigo.d '----con-;Ir~~-~~;--------------- Sign.d :___~.::..~~~ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This is to c.rtify that to thl b.st of my kn~ledge, information, ind b.lief, th. quantities and valuts of ~ort c.rtifi.d h.r.in is a fair approximat. .stimate for th. p.riod cov.r.d by this vouch.r. Contractor : K.nko, Inc. Sign.d By ------------------------------------ Dhl : Tith ------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------ City of Shor~ood Approv.d for Piymtnt Vouch.r ------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------- Ch.ck.d By : Authoriz.d R.prts.ntativt ------------------------------------ Datt : Dati r ----------------------- Pagt I of 4 833-3394 CITY OF SHOREWOOD PARK COMMISSION MEETING MONDAY, OCTOBER 21, 1985 COUNCIL CHAMBERS. 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD 7:00 PM M I NUT E S CALL TO ORDER Chairman Lindstrom called the meeting to order at 7:05 PM. ROLL CALL Present: Chairman Lindstrom, Commissioners Carl, Schmid, Kooi, Vogel and Squires; Council Liaison Gagne; Public Works Director Zdrazil and Deputy Clerk Niccum Absent: Commissioner Jakel (excused) VANDALISM IN PARKS South Lake Minnetonka Public Safety Department Chief Young was present to give advice on this problem. He said each park should be considered individually. Signs - he said small warning/reward signs on buildings are fine but overdoing signage can present an invitation and may do more harm than good. Lighting - he said more lighting would be beneficial in parks such as Cathcart and Manor where there are neighbors who can see any unusual activity going on. He also said it wouldn't help right now to do any lighting in Freeman Park because it isn't developed enough and it could encourage vandalism at this time. Alarms - he said the department has a portable alarm system they would be willing to rig up if an area has problems repeatedly. This system does not need power to operate. He suggested following this route rather than having the City purchase their own systems because of cost plus replacement cost. He said most vandalism is done by local people rather than people from outside the area. He mentioned the fact that there have been problems at Crescent Beach, and that they are working on the problem. Commissioner Carl asked what they should incorporate as development takes place. Chief Young suggested sufficent lighting and adequate buildings (i.e. concrete block structures with steel doors). Commission asked Public Works Director Zdrazil about vandalism. He said 4 picnic tables have been stolen in the last year, and at Freeman Park vandals have driven over an area where grass had been planted leaving deep ruts, torn the roofs off the dugouts three times and literally torn concrete blocks out of the dugout. Methods of preventing these things were discussed. Both Chief Young and Public Works Director Zdrazil felt that two gates at Freeman Park would help to prevent vandalism. To build them right the cost would probably be around $2500, but they both felt that the vandalism costs outweigh the cost of the gates over a period of time. It was suggested that they be opened and closed at certain hours, and that a sign be posted to that effect. Also that perhaps the Police Department could be responsible for locking and unlocking them. S' CITY OF SHOREWOOD PARK COMMISSION MINUTES MONDAY, OCTOBER 21, 1985 page two Commissioner Schmid said that they find that most of the vandalism among school age children is done by 8th, 9th and 10th graders. Commission asked Chief Young if the vandalism was drug or alcohol related. He said he would say alcohol related. LIGHTS/NOT TURNED OFF Commission discussed lights being left on by Athletic groups. They considered putting a clause in the contracts stating that a fine of at least $25 would be charged if the lights were not turned out. CATHCART HOCKEY RINK Public Works Director Zdrazil said he had asked the following four people for bids: Keller Construction no reply no reply stopped and talked to him submitted bid of $6321. for a rink like Excelsior has Ken Lund Louie Kokesh Jack Brancel Commission discussed the lateness of the season, and the fact that if they tore the existing rink down, they might end up with no rink at all. Schmid moved, Carl seconded, to recommend to Council to have Public Works Director Zdrazil take two days to repair the rink at a cost of no more than $600. Motion carried unanimously. They said they would pursue the new rink in May of 1986. TREES AT CATHCART PARK - TRANSPLANTING Chairman Lindstrom said six of the trees will be moved to Manor Park, the rest will probably remain at Cathcart (in different areas). There is a possibility that some will come to Badger Park. MANOR PARK WARMING HOUSE Commission discussed what to do about the warming house. Council Liaison Gagne said the Council did not want to burn it down. After discussion: Schmid moved, Kooi seconded, to recommend to Council to run an ad advertising the warming house for sale. Motion carried unanimously. AUTHORITY FOR PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR TO CLOSE FACILITIES ,Carl moved, Lindstrom seconded, to give Public Works Director Zdrazil the authority to close any park facility if he feels it is necessary. Motion carried unanimously. The above refers to such as football fields, hockey rinks, etc. . CITY OF SHOREWOOD PARK COMMISSION MEETING MONDAY, OCTOBER 21, 1985 page three MANOR PARK FENCE Public Works Director Zdrazil said all the posts are in and all the chain is up except for about 35'. DEBRIS DUMPED IN FREEMAN PARK Public Works Director Zdrazil said someone has dumped some rolled sod and small hunks of concrete in the park. FINANCIAL Councilman Gagne suggested to the Park Commission that after this when they have a chance at something free, they get some kind of guarantee in writing before they spend any money on it. SNOWMOBILE ORDINANCE Mr. John Arnst of 5480 Teal Circle was present to complain about the use of the Railroad corridor by snowmobiles. He said his bedroom window is 50 feet from the corridor and that he has called the police at 3:00 AM and held the phone out the window and the police could hear the snowmobile, unfortunately because he could not provide them with the information of who it was, a license number or other identifying information, they could not do anything. He said "Snowmobiling is strictly out of hand in the City of Shorewood". He made references to City Ordinances #54 and #59, and to a letter he had written to Councilmember Haugen on October 18, 1983 with a petition bearing 30 signatures. He said he would like to see the corridor put to more environmental use such as walking and running. He mentioned the fact that there didn't seem to be any regulation on hours. Commissioner Carl said that there are regulations, 10:00 PM on week days, and 12:00 PM on weekends, unless coming from or going to a specific destination. Mr. Arnst said he could not understand why a 14 year old could ride a snowmobile on the road with a safety certificate when they could not drive a car. Commissioner Carl stated that the Shorewood Ordinance only amended State and Federal Ordinances. Commissioner Schmid asked how many communities have banned use of snowmobiles on the corridor. Mr. Arnst said Shorewood is the only City that does allow it. Commissioner Carl gave the history of why the Southwest Trail Association uses the corridor as a snowmobile trail, saying they were given permission by the Hennepin County Railroad Authority for interim use with the understanding that they would upgrade, mark, maintain and groom the trail. He said that they were the ones that made the decision that no other motorized vehicles could use the corridor. He said that each individual city was given the choice whether or not to allow snowmobile use. He mentioned Greenwood (wanted to buy land and divide it among property owners to solve easement problems), Minnetonka (denied), Hopkins (denied), Excelsior (felt it would be unsafe on some of their street crossings), Victoria (denied) and Shorewood (accepted). ~ CITY OF SHOREWOOD PARK COMMISSION MEETING MONDAY, OCTOBER 21, 1985 page four Commissioner Carl said that having an official trail solved a lot of problems in the City. Mr. Arnst said that the Shocewood City Council claimed they had no control over the use of the corridor. He would like to know what the situation is because he was informed otherwise. Commission discussed whether or not to outlaw snowmobiles, either partially or completely, in the City of Shorewood. Commissioner Schmid said he had quit using the corridor for jogging because of almost being hit by a snowmobile. Mr. Arnst had also mentioned this problem. The question arose whether Shorewood is still rural enough to allow the snowmobile traffic that they allowed 15 years ago. The fact that the Police Department has a snowmobile (1978 TX Polaris) for use was mentioned. Mr. Arnst said it was outdated and could not catch up with the snowmobiles used today. Chairman Lindstrom said he felt that the Snowmobile Associations have a right to defend themselves. Kooi moved, Vogel seconded, that the snowmobile ordinance be tabled due to lack of information, that the Police Department be asked how many complaints they had last season, that Excelsior's Ordinance be examined, and that the Southwest Trail Association be informed as to the situation in case they wish to state their opinion. Motion carried unanimously. REPORTS Council Liaison Gagne said that the DNR had turned down the Christmas Lake Assoc- iation's lake access offer and still planned to condemn the Brook's property. COMMISSIONER GARY CARL RESIGNS Commissioner Carl said that as of this meeting (October 21, 1985) he is resigning due to personal matters. Commission thanked him for all his help over the years and said they would miss his input. Schmid moved, Lindstrom seconded, to recommend to the Council that Commissioner Carl be recognized and honored with a plaque. Motion carried unanimously. Schmid moved, Vogel seconded, to get in touch with the paper and let them know we need another Park Commissioner. Motion carried unanimously. ADJOURNMENT Vogel moved, Carl seconded, to adjourn at 9:36 PM. Motion carried unanimously. . . CITY OF SHOREWOOD MAYOR Robert Rascop COUNCI L Jan Haugen Tad Shaw K risti Stover Robert Gagne ADMINISTRATOR Daniel J. Vogt 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD . SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 . (612) 474-3236 DATE: Mayor and Councilmembers ( Dan VOgt~~~ October 24, 1985 MEMO TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Corridor Study Along with this memo you will find two other items relative to the proposed Corridor Study along Highway 7 from Highway 101 to the western boundary of Chanhassen. The first item is a draft Request for Proposal (RFP) for the study. This document is virtually the same as the draft previously sent. I will explain any minor changes in the draft RFP at the meeting of the 28th. The second item is a proposal for funding half of the study. The remaining half will be funded jointly by the Met Council and MN/DOT. Page two shows the share assigned to each city. The cities participating in the Corridor Study are now going to their respective City Council's to attempt to obtain a commitment to fund their proportionate share of the study. This is the reason this issue is now before you. Representatives of the Met Council will be present at the meeting to answer your questions. DJV:pr A Resid(mtial Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore GCL . . Metropolitan Council of the Twin Cities Area 300 Metro Square Building, 7th and Robert Streets st. Paul, Minnesota 55101 Tel. 612 291-6359/TDD 291-0904 DATE: August 7, 1985 TO: Hwy. 7 Corridor Study Members FROM: Ann Braden SUBJECT: DRAFT RFP for Hwy. 7 Corridor Study Attached 1s a draft Request for Proposal for the Highway 7 Study. Please review it as soon as possible and phone your comments before August 20 to Steve Alderson (291-6337) or to me, after that date. This will enable us to send a finalized version to you in advance of our September 5th meeting. JM8g8A 06 . . DRAFT REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS CORRIDOR STUDY FOR HIGHWAY 7 I. STANDARD PROVISIONS The Metropolitan Council of the Twin Cities Area solicits a proposal for entering into a contract for the performance of services in the development of a corridor study for Hwy. 7 between Hwy. 101 in Minnetonka, Minnesota to CR 13 in Chanhassen, Minnesota. It is anticipated that all consultant services for this project be completed within six months from the execution of the contract. Payments will be made on a cost-plus fixed fee basis. The proposal should be submitted in eight copies and mailed to the Metropolitan Council, 300 Metro Square Building, St. Paul, Minnesota 55101, attention: Ann Braden, Project Manager; telephone: (612) 291-6525. The Council, by this Request for Proposals, does not promise to accept the lowest or any other proposal, and specifically reserves the right to reject any or all proposals, to waive any formal proposal requirements, to investigate the qualification and experience of any proposer, to reject any provision in any proposal, to obtain new proposals, or to proceed to do the work otherwise. All proposals received no later than 5:00 p.m. on November , 1985 will be considered by the Council and, in the event that a proposal is accepted, the Council will notify the successful proposer in writing within 30 days following receipt of the proposal. The Council anticipates that the requested services will be funded by the Metropolitan Council, the Minnesota Department of Transportation and the six communities within the Hwy. 7 Corridor (Minnetonka, Shorewood, Deephaven, GreenWOOd, Excelsior and Chanhassen). Funding from federal grants may impose contract requirements other than those included in the standard Council contract for Consultant Services including the provision of OMB Circular A-102. It is the policy of the Metropolitan Council to provide equal economic opportunity in the procurement of all goods and services. The awarding of contracts by the Council will be made without discrimination based on race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, marital status, status with regard to public assistance, disability, age, or political affiliation. It is the Council's policy to act affirmatively, through its Women and Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (W/DBE) program, to promote and enter into contracts with W/DBEs, and firms having effective, implemented affirmative action programs. As part of this policy, the Council annually establishes W/DBE participation goals. In addition, individual contract goals are established for specific projects. A DBE participation goal of 10 percent has been established for this contract. DBE firms which are proposed as subcontractors to meet the DBE participation goals set for this contract, must be certified as DBEs with the Metropolitan Council at the time the contract is executed. For details in :his requirement contact Stephen Alderson at 291-6337. . . Bidders that propose less than the total DBE participation goal shall be required to document good faith efforts to meet the goal. A bidder's 1) failure to include DBE participation in this project which meets the DBE participation goals for the contract, and 2) failure to show meaningful good faith efforts to meet the goals, may be grounds for finding the bid or proposal nonresponsive. Proposals should include a representation signed by an authorized contracting officer as follows: This proposal constitutes an offer by the undersigned to enter into a contract to perform the described services for the compensations specified herein and containing the terms and condi~ions in the standard Council contract for consultant services orrequred by applicable state or federal law or regulation. The representation may be made in the front of the proposal document or in a transmittal letter. Contents of the proposed document shall be organized in the following form: I. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED SERVICES AND PRODUCTS State the contractor's qualifications and experience, and outline the methods proposed to accomplish the objectives of the project. The principals performing the work and the proposal writers should also be identified. Describe the management and personnel assignments, including the person hours proposed to ensure timely completion of the project. Specifically describe how the task in the scope of work will be accomplished. II. PROPOSED PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE State the proposed time frame for completion of each project phase. Provide a brief assessment of your current workload and anticipated workload during the term of this contract. III. REQUESTED COMPENSATION FOR PROPOSED SERVICES The amount of money available in this project for the performance of consultant services is $50,000. A detailed breakdown of all costs proposed for this project is required. A preliminary budget by task or group of associated tasks indicating personnel assigned, labor hours by person, travel, materials and other assoicated expenses must be included. The direct labor hours and rate for each person assigned shall also be included. In addition, a two-page executive summary covering the above information should be included. The following material should be placed in appendices or in a separate document: . . A. Related Experience Describe other projects which the contractor has performed which demonstrate the contractor's qualifications, experience and technical expertise for completing this project. B. Qualifications of Key Personnel Submit resumes for the lead and major supporting personnel who will be assigned to the project. The persons proposed must be available to perform the work as described in the proposal. If consultants, advisors or subcontractors are to be used, the arrangements must be described and resumes of key personnel from the subcontracting firm must be identified. C. Staff Complement by Race and Sex and a utilization Analysis of Minority and Women Employees or Consultants The contractor will indicate the makeup of staff by race and sex, as well as indicate the relative positions of minority and women employees or consultants. In addition, the contractor will be required to make certain assurances of compliance with the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and other assurances as may be required by federal government regulations. D. References Provide a list of three to five clients (include addresses and telephone numbers) for whom you have performed services similar to those described in this RFP within the past five to seven years. E. Financial Statement Each contractor shall submit a financial statement to establish financial repsonsibility and the fiscal competency to perform the work outlined in the proposal. Proposals not sufficiently detailed or in acceptable form may be returned for completion or may be rejected by the Council. II. GENERAL INFORMATION A. Background Hwy. 7 is a major arterial on the regional highway system. It is an important travel corridor connecting Minneapolis and its' western suburbs. Highway 7 has a mix of different access points, design problems, high traffic volumes and accident rates. The Hwy. 7 corridor lacks north-south continuity as well as parallel east-wes~ routes. The latest ADT counts range from 30,000 at Hwy. 101 to 15,000 near Chanhassen's western border. Recent proposalS to revise access to Hwy. 7 west of Hwy. 101 have raised concern among several communities. Those communities (Minnetonka, Chanhassen, Shorewood, Excelsior, Deephaven, and Greenwood), as well as the Minnesota Department of Transportation and the Metropolitan Council, recogn~:e the need to improve the operation of Hwy. 7 as a regiona: ~oadway . . while accommodating the planned growth. To this end, the affected cities, the Minnesota Department of Transportation, and the Metropolitan Council, wish to have a corridor study for Highway 7 between Hwy. 101 in Minnetonka and CR 13 in Hennepin County. The study should address the following: B. Scope of Services The consultant would undertake the necessary analyses to: 1. Identify need for local street access to Hwy. 7. 2. Identify need for access from various land uses along Hwy. 7 -- such as existing commercial properties, residences and public institutions (Minnetonka High School). 3. Identify the development potential in the travelshed (from Lake Minnetonka South to 62 Street and from Hwy. 101 to ~stern boundary of Chanhassen. 4. Identify regional traffic needs on Hwy. 7. 5. Identify appropriate safety and design guidelines for Hwy. 7. 6. Based on the above, examine alternative solutions in terms of conceptual designs and strategies, discuss canparatively the rrerits and dra~cks-of each, and identify preferred alternatives and discuss logical staging of projects. 7. Estimate costs of implementing preferred solutions/strategies and identify possible funding sources. 8. Participa~e in a study process for involvement of affected age~cies. The process will be coordinated by the Council and Mn/DOT. The consultant will provide input at meetings as feasible within the study budget. 9. Prepare a sketch plan incorporatiang recommendations based on the preferred alternates. The information sources, including but not limited to, maps, travel forecasts, land use data and the like needed to accomplish the above tasks will be provided primarily by the participating communities, the Metropolitan Council, and MnIDOT District 5 who will jointly participate in this study. Necessary computer costs will be paid by the Metropolitan Council and/or Mn/DOT. Exact details of joint participation are subject to negotiation with the selected consultant. III. SELECTION CRITERIA EXDerience of the Firm A. 1. Experience of the proposer in preparing similar corridor analyses. 2. Quality of product examples submitted by the proposer. ~ IV. . . B. Professional Qualifications 1. Adequate professional staff to manage the project. 2. Adequate professional and support staff to carry out each of the task outlined in this request for proposals in a timely manner. 3. Existence of effective, implemented affirmative action programs and proportional female or minority ownership or management. 4. Qaulifications of key staff persons assigned to various tasks. 5. Allocation of principal and senior level staff time to the study. C. Proposal 1. Completeness and quality of services proposed in addressing the tasks outlined in this RFP. 2. Extent to which disadvantaged and women business enterprises will participate in the contract proposed. 3. Breakdown and allocation of resources to each of the tasks outlined in this RFP. D. Accessibility to Project Manager and the Project Management Team REQUIRED PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE The services should be completed within 6 months following the execution of the contract. V. MAXIMUM COMPENSATION AND MANNER OF PAYMENT jM898A The budgeted arrount of the study will be $50,CXX>. Payments are to be made on a cost plus fixed fee basis. Payments will be based on invoices submitted by the consultant showing labor hours, labor costs, overhead and other direct costs. Ninety percent of each invoice wi:l be pa~d within thirty (30) days of receipt. The 10 percent withheld and othe~ outstanding amounts will be paid upon satisfactory completion of the contract. < -4 . . Metropolitan Council of the Twin Cities Area 300 Metro Square Building, 7th and Robert Streets St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 Tel. 612 291-6359/TDD 291-0904 DATE: October 10, 1985 FROM: Ann Braden Hwy 7 Study Committee TO: SUBJECT: Results of Selected Link Analysis for TH 7 and Suggestion for Pro-Rating Study Costs At the Committee's request, total vehicle trips for year 2000 were forecasted for the six participating cities. These totals are aggregations of the individual TAZ trip forecasts and are shown in column E. If the TAZ included portions of more than one city, the trips were divided in proportion to the 1990 population forecasted for each city. Trips from each community were assigned to the study segment of Hwy. 7. The results are shown in Columns A and C below: City (A) Hwy 7 Trips in 1980 Minnetonka Chanhassen Shorewood Excelsior Greenwood Deephaven 16,328 9,486 10,265 16,793 2,543 2,497 57,912 Total (B) J of Total 1980 Trips 28% 17% 18% 29% 4% 4% (C) Hwy 7 Trips in 2000 20,991 13,177 13, 138 12,505 2,021 5,323 67,155 (D) % of Total 2000 Total 31% 20% 20% 18% 3% 8% (E) 2000 Total Vehicle Trips 298,001 107,605 24,827 14,212 2,079 11,893 458,617 (F) % of Total 2000 Trips on Hwy 7 {(C)+- (E)} 7% 12% 53% 92% 97% 45% Comparison of columns D and F is interesting; it shows that in 2000 almost one- third of the trips on Hwy 7 between 101 and 41 produced by the six communities are generated by Minnetonka., yet only 7% of all Minnetonka.' s year 2000 trips use that stretch of Hwy 7. Greenwood, on the other hand, is more "dependent" on Hwy 7 -- 97% of all its forecasted trips use that portion of Hwy 7, yet only 3% of the community-generated trips on Hwy 7 originate in Greenwood. An anomaly exists; Excelsior's total trips as well as its Hwy 7 trips DECREASE between 1980 and 2000. Total 1980 trips are 19,282 and total 2000 trips are 14,212. All of Excelsior is within TAZ 757. Forecasted socio- economic data shows a slight increase in population, households and employment; We're trying to figure out why this happened and we hope to have an answer by the 24th. ~~ ~ . . If the projected year 2000 Hwy 7 trips generated by the communities were used to apportion contributions to the study (see column D), the costs could be shared as follows: Minnetonka .31 x $25,000 = $7,750 Chanhassen .20 x $25,000 = $5,000 Shorewood .20 x $25,000 = $5,000 Excelsior .18 x $25,000 = $4,500 Greenwood .03 x $25,000 = $ 750 Deephaven .08 x $25,000 = $2,000 This is only a suggestion for dividing the costs; you may wish to consider other factors and weight them accordingly. Please come prepared with comments to the October 24th meeting. reach agreement on a method of sharing the study costs, as well to proceed with consultant solicitation. If you have questions data please call me at 291-6525. . Thanks. AGNTH7/PHTRN1 I hope we can as committment about the - REC'O OCT 2 1 1985 October 17, 1985 / SHOREWOOD CITY COUNCIL 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, MN 55331 Dear Council Members: We hope to bring to your attention with this letter signed by a large majority of our neighborhood residents, a problem that exists with vehicles parking on the Shorewood city street of Enchanted Drive. At the present time the Mound West Tonka school buses cannot make their turn-around at the cul-de-sac at the end of Enchanted Drive. -This is due to several cars parked on the city street. Because of this, the Mound School Transportation Department is requiring that the children walk to the intersection of Dellwood and Enchanted Drive to wait for the school bus. This area is not in sight of any residents and also is not lighted. It is well known that the Dellwood street area is a favorite parking and party area for many non-residents. 11m sure you can share our concern for our children's safety. In addition, we are also concerned with the extra walking distance and our inability to tell if our children were picked up by the buses or not. This, of course, becomes a serious problem during extreme weather conditions. For the safety of our children, we are requesting that a limited parking ban be implemented. This could be for the hours of 6:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, except for holidays during the school year. This would allow the school buses to again operate on the route they have been driving for at least the past 10 years. WESTONKA PUBLIC SCHOOLS INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 277 5600 LYNWOOD BOULEVARD MOUND. MINNESOTA 55364 PHONE: 472-1600 DR. ERWIN F. STEVENSON . SUPERINTENDENT DONALD BRANDENBURG ASSISTANT SUPERINTENDENT October 24, 1985 Mr. Greg Smith 4345 Enchanted Drive Mound, MN 55364 Dea r Mr. Smith, As we discussed on the telephone, it is our oplnlon that it is not a good, safe situation to turn a school bus around at Enchanted Drive and Highland Circle. The right turn into Highland Circle with a school bus will be hard to make because of the narrow street width. The slope downward of Highland Circle makes this location an undesirable location to enter and depart from either going forward or in reverse. We feel the most desirable turn-around is the cul-de-sac of Enchanted Drive with parking banned. Thank you. /1 l ' ,0 , Since....relY yours, /!< .:....' /' ! -2) ~J '~j, ~ ' eft vi ;:.-: . f- ~'- Vi dtor E. Ni ska SUPERVISOR OF FACILITIESj TRANSPORTATION VEN:ah On the Shores of Beautiful Lake Minnetonka . MA VOR Robert Rascop COUNCIL Jan Haugen Tad Shaw Kristi Stover Robert Gagne ADMINISTRATOR Daniel J. Vogt . CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD . SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 . (612) 474-3236 MEMO TO: Mayor and Councilmembers FROM, Oan VOgt~ DATE: October 22, 1985 SUBJECT: Water Study Committee Report At your meeting of September 30, 1985, the ShorewoodWater Study Committee issued its repQrt relative to the water system. You requested that staff review the report and be prepared to comment on it at your meetin~ of October 28, 1985. Below are my comments which will be limited to those r~commendations which I feel need comment and further consideration. Those recommendations which I have not commented on are felt to be reasonable and do not nece~sarily need a good deal of discussion by myself~ Comments from the City Attorney and City Engineer are being made by separate letter. Recommendation number: 2. Should this recommendation be adopted, it must be established what "A reason- able range of becoming self-supporting" really is.. This will be a policy decision made by the Council. Also, if the Council adopts recommendation number 3 and certain wells are abandoned, how can the system expand even on "A totally voluntary basis" ? . 3. The total costs and legal ramifications of this retommendation must be studied in great. detail. If, for instance, Badger Well isiabandoned, how will the remaining amount due on the bond issue be paid? Ptincipal and Interest payments total $192,625 for the remaining years of the bond! issue. Also, if the City puts in new private wells for the persons on an ab,ndoned system, how will this cost be paid? And further, if the City paid for drilling the new wells, will the City also be responsible for maintenance of th~se wells? A few other items for consideration are: will the City lower assessed valuations on property which had City water and now has a private well, a~d, how will the City handle those property owners that have either paid an assessment for Municipal water or paid the cost for Municipal water in the cost of their lot? 5. Perhaps the City should first attempt to cover operation and maintenance costs before it tries to "establish a dedicated repair a~d replacement fund for the wells". However, this recommendation is well take~ and is worthy of future consideration. . 10. The legal ramifications and responsibility issues need to be fully addressed relative to this recommendation. DJV:ph . ..4'r. A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka'~ South Shore g .- ORR .SCHELEN. MAYERON & ASSOCIATES, INC. Consu!u!JU Engineers L ami Survc,ors October 24, 1985 City of Shorewood 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, MN 55331 Attn: Mr. Dan Vogt City Administrator Re: Shorewood Water Study Committee Report Dear Dan: This letter is a response to the Shorewood Water Study Committee1s Report of September 30, 1985. In general, we will respond to the 10 recommendations in- cluded in the report. The report recommendation will be listed first followed by our comments. (01) A city-wide municipal water system is not warranted at this time. To determine whether a municipal water system is warranted or not should involve all the residents of Shorewood. In 1977 when this was discussed at a public hearing there was a majority consensus that a municipal system was not wanted then. Since that time, new developments have occurred and addi- tional central water systems have been installed to serve those develop- ments. Subsequently, many residents have contacted City Hall to see if water could be extended from those systems to serve them. s .stems which are within (02) This seems like a reasonable approach. contribute we ls. . (03) This recommendation does not seem like a ~ell thought out approach to solv- ing part of an operatin9 deficit problem. There are several issues that must be addressed: A. Those peopl e currently served by muni ci pal water shoul d be con- tacted to see if they would want to drill th,eir own individual 'well s. 9 - J FROBERG & PENBERTHY,P.A. A TTORNEYS A T LA W Glenn Froberg James G. Penberthy Paul B. Ahern 17736 Excelsior Boulevard Minnetonka, Minnesota 55345 (612) 474-8877 October 28, 1985 MEMO TO: Dan Vogt FROM: Glenn Froberg SUBJECT: Water Study Committee Report Pursuant to your request, I have researched the legal issues raised by the recommendations included in the Shorewood Water Study Committee report dated September 30, 1985. Items 3 and 10 of the report concern the sale or abandonment by the City of existing municipal water and well facilities and provide in their stead, individual private wells. Minnesota Statutes Section 412.321, Subd. 4, provides a procedure for selling or discontinuing operation of all or part of a City-owned utility by ordinance or resolution of the City Council. This ordinance or resolution, however, must be approved by two-thirds of the electors voting at a general or special election. Furthermore, it has been generally held that a City must have "good cause" in order to discontinue a utility service. A patron of a public utility has a right to insist upon continuance of this service unless there is a valid reason for refusal to serve. Conversely, it is the duty o~ any municipally-owned utility to supply the service it offers to all persons who apply, and such service cannot be cut off without "good cause." "Good cause" requires a factual determination which must be made by the trier-of-fact (court or jury). There appears to be no statutory authority for the City to enter into a contract under which it could payor compensate a user for the discontinuance of a utility service. It, therefore, appears that the City could not legally provide private wells for the users cut off from the municipal service, assuming it were successful in establishing "good cause" for the discontinuance of the service with a two-thirds majority vote at a general or special election. Items 4 and 9 concern increasing water rates to City water users a reasonable amount and keeping costs for water purchase users from other cities separately. As to increasing the rates to users within the City, a village may charge its water consumers at such rates as will produce revenue in the amounts necessary to cover the operation and maintenance expense of the water utility since it is generally held that a municipality may operate its water system in such a manner as to make a fair profit providing they are not discriminatory. As to users B . ' Dan Vogt City of Shorewood October 28, 1985 -Page 2- authority to supply water at such rates and upon such terms as the City Council shall determine. These need not be the same rates as the rates applied to residents of the City. There would appear to be no reason why the City could not raise the present rates uniformly within and without the City. Item 7 concerns the development of a water utility commission to oversee water system management, etc. Minnesota Statutes Section 412.321 provides for the establishment of a "public utilities commission", consisting of three members appointed by this council. The commission could have jurisdiction of the City water system, and exercise control of the utility, with certain specific powers prescribed by statute. Whether or not the establishment of such a commission for the sole purpose of administering the municipal water program is warranted is a question for the Council. Although many questions are raised for the Council in the committee's report, I believe this covers the legal issues involved. Please call me should you require further details on any of the above. . . ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 168 IN THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD BEING AN ORDINANCE FOR THE PURPOSE OF PROMOTING HEALTH, SAFETY, ORDER, CONVENIENCE, PROSPERITY AND GENERAL WELFARE BY REGULATING THE USE OF LAND, THE LOCATION, AREA, SIZE, USE AND HEIGHT OF BUILDINGS ON LOTS AND THE DENSITY OF POPULATION IN THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA. The City Council of the City of Shorewood, does ordain: Section 1. Ordinance No. 168, Section 200.09 Subd. 2, is hereby amended as follows: "Official Zoning map may be and is hereby amended by including within the P.U.D. Zoning District property described as: Robert S.C. Peterson Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota." Section 2. This Ordinance shall be effective from and after its passage and publication. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Shorewood this day of , 1985. Robert Rascop, Mayor ATTEST: Sandra L. Kennelly, City Clerk q b,."dl C"91"cc,I"9 a lu,vcylng 1705 woodl 1,.11 bu,,,/vlllc, ml"nc,ol. 55557 (611) 455-1966 21 October, 1985 Mr. Brad Neilson CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, MN 55331 Re/SHOREWOOD OAKS Dear Mr. Neilson; Shorewood Oaks Development Company, developer of the above-referenced proJect, is requesting that the City of Shorewood consider allowing Shorewood Oaks Development Company to install the watermain from Boulder Ridge to the SHOREWOOD OAKS proJect. An agreement of some kind should be possible whereby Shorewood Oaks Development Company would be compensated for anyone else hooking up to this watermain for a specified period of time. This would make it possible to eliminate 73 wells from being installed at a substantial cost and a future contamination situation where it would be necessary for the City to install watermain anyway. Thank you for your consideration. Sirlcerely yours, ,~~ '~;-:. ~randt, PE LS /1 . . CITY OF EXCELSIOR 339 THIRD STREET EXCELSIOR, MINNESOTA 55331 TELE: 612-474-3464,474-5233 OFFICE OF DIRECTOR OF P'UBLIC WORKS October 23, 1985 Sandra Kennelly, City Clerk City bf Shorewood 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, Minnesota 55331 Re: Water Connection Service 23370 Academy Avenue Shorewood, Minnesota 55331 Dear Sandy: In response ,to your request, the City Council, at their meeting October 21, 1985, authorized the above wat~r connection provided costs, as listed, are paid in advance of the connection and the requirements, as stated, are met. 1. Wa~er Connection Unit Charge 2. Construction, legal and administrative costs at time of installation 3. Interest compounded from 1974 to 1985 4. Permi t fee Total $ 450.00 1,089.00 985.30 15.00 $2,539.30 Water meter to be installed on water service" line in the building in order to monitor all water consumed by the property owner; installation of meter to be done prior to water being turned on to the property. The water service line is to be installed by meeting all state plumbing codes ~or water service lines. The City of Excelsior shall receive $2,539.30 before any permits are issued. Sincerely, C/&z~ Director, Public Works /p cc-Cris Gears .# I d,.,!J . . CITY OF EXCELSIOR 339 THIRD STREET EXCELSIOR, MINNESOTA 55331 TELE: 612-474-3464, 474-5233 OFFICE OF DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS October 235 1985 Sandra Kennellys City Clerk City bf Shorewood 5755 Country Club Road Shorewoods Minnesota 55331 Re: Water Connection Service 23370 Academy Avenue Shorewood, Minnesota 55331 Dear Sandy: In response to your requests the City Councils at their meeting October 21, 1985, authorized the above water connection provided costss as listed, are paid in advance of the connection and the requirements, as stateds are met. 1. Water Connection Unit Charge 2. Constructions legal and administrative costs at time of installation 3. Interest compounded from 1974 to 1985 4. Permit fee Total $ 450.00 1,089.00 985.30 15.00 $25539.30 Water meter to be installed on water service line in the building in order to monitor all water consumed by the property owner; installation of meter to be done prior to water being turned on to the property. The water service line is to be installed by meeting all state plumbing codes for water service lines. The City of Excelsior shall receive $25539.30 before any permits are issued. {j;J1Yi~ Carl Z~ ., - Directors Public Works /p cc-Cris Gears lab- Meetings and Agendas Suite 300, Metro Square Building, St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 October 25, 1985 612 291-6359 WEEK OF OCT. 28 - NOV. 1 NOTE: This publication contains a one-week list of meetings and agenda items for the Metropolitan Council, its standing committees and advisory committees, as well as similar information for the Regional Transit Board, the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission and the Metropolitan Parks and Open Space Commission. Meetings and agendas occasionally must be changed. To verify the meeting schedule in advance, call 291-6464. Media should continue to call Ken Reddick, 291-6422, or Lynna Williams, 291-6511. Metropolitan Parks and Open Space Commission - Monday, Oct. 28, 4 p.m., Conference Room E~ The commission will consider amendments to regional park grant contracts, natural resources development grant criteria and guidelines, an acquisItion grant amendment for Scott-Hennepin Regional Trail, a public hearing report and recommendations on the Recreation Open Space Development Guide/Policy Plan and a Public Awareness Subcommittee report. Metropolitan Systems Committee - Monday, Oct. 28, 4 p.m., Council Chambers. The committee will hold a Council public hearing on the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission's 1986-1990 development program. The New Solid Waste System: Changes for Business - Tuesday, Oct. 29, 7:30 a.m., Sheraton Midway, 400 N. Hamline, St. Paul. Co-sponsored by the Council and the Minnesota Association of Commerce and Industry, the forum will address the impact the region's new solid 'waste system will have on businesses. Metropolitan Waste Control Commission Breakfast Meeting - Tuesday, Oct. 29, 7:30 a.m., Pannekoeken Restaurant, 1505 S. Robert St., St. Paul. Chair Peter Meintsma will meet with local officials. Metropolitan Housing and Redevelopment Authority Tenth Anniversary Recognition - Tuesday, Oct. 29, 11:30 a.m., Ramada Hotel, Interstate Hwy. 94 & White Bear - Av., St. Paul. Waste Tire Forum - Wednesday, Oct. 30, 8:30 a.m., Auditorium, Science Museum of Minnesota, St. Paul. The forum will consider a study of waste tire collection and incineration; the waste tire abatement program; the waste tire reCYCling loan program; the supply and demand markets for waste tires; and collection, storage and reuse of waste tires. Environmental Resources Committee - Wednesday, Oct. 30, 4 p.m., Conference Room E. The committee will review the executive summary of a report on existing market conditions for recycled materials. It will act on the environmental impact statement for Reuter Inc.'s project. It will hear a briefing on the draft of the aggregate resources report. Public Hearing on Proposed Advanced Life Support Service - Wednesday, Oct. 30, 6:30 p.m., Apple Valley City Hall, 14200 Cedar Av., Apple Valley. The Metropolitan Council's Metropolitan Health Planning Board will hold a public hearing on a proposal by Apple Valley, Lakeville and Farmington to operate an advanced life support transportation service, ALF Ambulance, in those communities. Minneapolis-St. Paul Airport Noise Task Force - Thursday, Oct. 31, 2:30 p.m., Council Chambers. The task force will hear presentations from airline industry representatives, citizens and legislators about the problem of airport noise. Metropolitan Waste Control Commission - Friday, Nov. 1, 2 p.m., Richfield City Hall, 6700 Portland Av., Richfield. The commission will hold a public meeting. on the recommendations in a report from its Rate Study Task Force.