Loading...
061184 CC Reg AgP .. .. CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MONDAY, JUNE 11, 1984 AGE N D A CALL TO ORDER A. Pledge of Allegiance B. Roll Call: 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. Board of Review - May 24, 1984 B. Audit Review Meeting - May 29, 1984 C. Regular Council Meeting - May 29, 1984 " COUNCIL CHAMBERS 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD 7:30 P.M. Mayor "'''-'7 ~ IL, ~"r) / V\ Rascop~j ~'- Haugen - 1\:1f7 Shaw' I Stover 0 Gagne~ (Attach. #la) (Attach. #lb) (Attach. #lc) 2. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR A.~..J~d-~r~j B. 3. PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT A. B. 4. PARK COMMISSION REPORT A. B. 5. FENCE PERMIT REQUEST Applicant: Susan Morgan and Linda Scott Location: 5235 Shady Lane 6. SIMPLE SUBDIVISON Applicant: Mrs. A.T. Ridinger Location: 5530 Howard's Point Road (Attachment 5a - application) (Attachment 6a - staff report) Refer: Planning Commisson Minutes in packet ,~ ... ... l AGENDA REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MONDAY, JUNE 11, 1984 Page Two 7. 8:00 PM PUBLIC HEARING - REAR YARD SETBACK VARIANCE Applicant: Richard Gay Location: 5480 Covington Road (Attachment #7a - Legal Notice & recommendation) Refer: Plan. Comm. Minutes 8. 8:15 PM PUBLIC HEARING - VARIANCE TO EXPAND A NONCONFORMING STRUCTURE Applicant: Keith Bedford Location: 24375 Wood Drive (Attachment 8a - Legal Notice & recommendation) Refer: Plan. Comm. Minutes 9. 8:30 PM PUBLIC HEARING - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT AND REZONING TO P.U.D. Applicant: Trivesco Location: Between Hwy 7, Covington Road and Vine Hill Road (Attachment #9a - Legal Notice) (Attachment #9b - S. Larson letter) (Attachment #9c - Revised page PUD Booklet) *REFER: May 29, 1984 Packet - Attach. #8) 10. AMESBURY WEST TRAIL DISCUSSION 11. WATER POLICY DISCUSSION 12. ATTORNEY'S REPORT A. 13. ENGINEER'S REPORT A. 14. ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT A. Clarification of CDBG Fund to be used. B.~~ C~ OWj j~ CITY OF SHOREWOOD MAYOR Robert Rascop COUNCI L Jan Haugen Tad Shaw K risti Stover Robert Gagne 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD . SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 . (612) 474-3236 July 9, 1984 Ms. Carol Flynn Metro Systems Committee /0 Metro Council 300 Metro Square Bldg. St. Paul, Minn. 55101 Dear Ms. Flynn: It has come to the attention of the Council of the City of Shorewood that there is a great deal of concern about the installation of a force main along the south shore of Christmas Lake in Chanhassen. The Council has discussed this matter with concerned residents of Chanhassen and our City Engineer. The City at this time does not feel it has obtained sufficient information to support Chanhassen citizen's recommendation for a gravity line, but does support its concerns and would hope that your Committee will recognize these concerns and not make a final decision until all facts and information has been carefully studied. We thank the Committee, in advance, for their recognition of concerned citizens and your thorough investigation to best suit this system to protect the ~nvironment in this area. The City of Shorewood Council Thank you, /- /.- :.~~<, ~( '--'~?j---" (. . . ,.'.: , b..,--. .' , ./'_ Sandra Kennelly - City Clerk -.;;'-.,-,(: ('/.', // A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore ~;..--- CITY OF SHOREWOOD ~ ... REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY, MAY 29, 1984 .....,j .' "'~NCIL CHAMBERS 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD 7 : 30 P .,M. .. . M I NUT E S CALL TO ORDER The regular meeting of the Shorewood City Council was called to order by Mayor Rascop at 8:00 PM, Tuesday, May 29, 1984, in the Council Chambers of City Hall. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The meeting was opened with the Pledge of Allegiance and a prayer by Mayor Rascop. ROLL CALL Present: Mayor Rascop, Councilmembers Gagne, Haugen, Shaw, and Stover. Staff: Attorney Larson, Engineer Mittlesteadt, Planner Nielsen, Clerk Kennelly. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Gagne moved, seconded by Haugen to approve the minutes of the regular Council meeting of May 14, 1984, as corrected. Motion carried unanimously. NONCONFORMING USE - ZONING ORDINANCE TEXT AMENDMENT ORDINANCE NO. 159 Planner Nielsen presented the second reading of the Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment allowing variances for the expansion of nonconforming single-family residential structures under reasonable conditions determined by the City Council. The second reading was reviewed as revised from the first reading. Haugen moved, seconded by Gagne to accept the second reading as originally drafted ift the first reading. The Ordinance was adopted by Roll Call Vote - 4 ayes - 1 nay (Shaw). 8:00 PM PUBLIC HEARING - KEIFER VARIANCE RESOLUTION NO. 28-84 The public hearing was opened at 8:40 PM for the purpose of obtaining a variance to expand a nonconforming structure by adding a deck to the present structure that will not increase the nonconformity. The public portion of the meeting was closed by Mayor Rascop at 8:42PM without public comment. Gagne moved, seconded by Rascop to approve the variance as requested. Variance approved by Roll Call Vote - 5 ayes. JUMAR MOTOR HOME REQUEST Jumar request was delayed at the request of the applicant. I.c. . REGULAOUNCIL MEETIN.G TUESDAY, MAY 29, 1984 Page Two INFORMAL PRESENTATION - TRIVESCO John Uban representing Trivesco rev ewed the changes that have been made in the project since the last presentation 1) Multiple units reduced from 160 to 144. 2) Multiples will be moved further to the west, away from the existing residential area, with lower density in the easterly buildings - 1.50 foot setback from current residential area. 3) Ponding area enlarged. 4) 2.5 unit per acre density for overall project. 5) Reduction in commercial buildings to 4, plus a probabl~ restaurant · two-thirds of commercial used for retail and one-third office space. No definite commitments have been made for any of the proposed commercial area at this time. Concerns from residents on the type of commercial zoning and uses that would be allowed in that area. Planner Nielsen explained that the P.U.D zoning would control the type of uses as determined by the Council in an agreement with the developers. The uses would not necessarily follow along any of the existing commercial zoning uses, the limitations would probably be more restrictive. Council questioned sewer capacity and its preparation of an Environmental Assess- ment Worksheet (E.A.W.). Mr. Uban said an E.A.W. would be requested at the conclusion of the P.U.D. process. Engineer Mittlesteadt confirmed. the sewer capacity of the current system is more than adequate to handle this project. Mrs. Vogel of 19795 Excelsior Blvd. wanted to know what would happen if the existing wells went dry because of the project. Engineer Mittlesteadt assured her that the Jordan Strait contained enough water not to even be affected by this project. The Jordon Strait is much deeper than the strait currently being used for residential wells in the area. Mrs. Vogel also questioned "Why the developer wanted to put so many people' in that area?". Mr. Uban indicated that there is a need for that type of housing. ~onnie Workman of Deephaven disagreed with the proposed intersection with stop lights and with any proposed restaurant construction. Paul Seifert of 5515 Radisson Entrance questioned a traffic study and how large of a area would be studied. Study will extend from Highways 7 and 101 to Christmas Lake intersections, and north and south from Vine Hill Road in Deephaven to Highway 101 south. Stephen Larson of 20435 Radisson Inn Road questioned the type of restaurant, parking and traffic problems. Mr. Uban indicated a high quality, sit-down, full service restaurant with liquor license, not a "bar scene" type. Parking space available with a restaurant with limited shared parking area available. Mrs. Vogel wanted to know who would have control over the condo's and commercial projects after completion. Mr. Uban stated the condo's would be individual purchases and the commercial would probably have an "investors group". Rascop assured the residents that regardless of the ownership, the restrictions placed on the project by the P.U.D. would always control the area uses. Mayor Rascop thanked the audience for their comments and informed them that the Public Hearing on the Comprehensive Plan Amendment aqd Rezoning will be held at 8:30 PM on Monday, June 11, 1984. All written and public comments will be accepted at that time. . RRGU~OUNCIL MEETING TUESDJlrMAY 29, 1984 Page Three RAPID OIL CHANGE VARIANCE RESOLUTION NO. 29-84 Attorney James Steilon and Ed Flaherty, President of Rapid Of 1, requested a reconsideration of their variance request at the Council meeting of May 14, 1984. The Council accepted the request and asked the City Attorney to clarify the necessary vote needed to accept or deny a variance request. Attorney Larson indicated that no definite law was set in reference to 3/5 or 4/5. vote ruling and that the City would be able to defend its current requirement of a 4/5 vote. A report was also received from Planner Nielsen on the usable area of this lot configuration. Without variances, approximately 1000 square feet could be built on, (e.g. a 20 X 50 foot building), and meet the setback requirement. Mr. Nielsen felt that the lot configuration did create a "hardship" that would deem the lot basically unusable without a variance being granted. Mr. and Mrs. Vogel had their questions answered by Mr. Flaherty in reference to the amount of traffic flow and ground wat~r run-off and sanitary waste disposal answered to their satisfaction. 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) 6) Haugen to grant a variance to include: . '. . ~ p~~ . S()(~~~ new construction at 23 feet from rear lot line, ~O ~.. 1 Gagne moved, seconded by Minimum setback of 47 foot setback for existing building. C.U.P. for "caretaker residence" in compliance with Ordinance No. 152. Removal of billboard sign by June, 1990. Added landscaping. Signage is limited to no more than 10% of the total building silhouette (both buildings) as viewed from the street. ' Natural color tones for building and approved building Drainage plan approved by City and MnDOT Engineers. 7) 8) configuration. .~ Variance granted by Roll Call Vote - 4 ayes - 1 nay (Stover). RESOLUTION NO. 30-84 BEER (3.2), WINE, AND LIQUOR LICENSE APPROVALS Haugen moved, seconded by Gagne to approve and issue the following licenses subject to verification of insurance coverage and approval of the Police Dept.: Skipperette Off-sale (3.2) Plaza Tom Thumb Off-sale (3.2) Driskill's Off-sale (3.2) Mtka. Country Club On-sale Liquor and Sunday American Legion Club and Sunday Phoenix Gardens On-sale Wine and Beer and Sunday Motion carried unanimously. RESOLUTION NO. 31-.84 AWARD TREE REMOVAL BIDS Gagne moved, seconded by Shaw to award the Tree Removal Bids subject to verification of insurance coverage to lowest bidder supplying insurance coverage within 10 days or award to the next lowest bidder. Bids awarded as follows: . REG~ COUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY, MAY 29, 1894 Page Four Tree Bids, continued: BID # - CONTRACTOR AMOUNT $ 280.00 1,491. 75 672.75 1,053.00 1 , 11 1. 50 365.00 1.075.00 11 7 .00 1 2 3 4 5 6. 7 8 Shorewood Tree Service Shadywood Tree Experts Shadywood Tree Experts Shadywood Tree Experts Shadywood Tree Experts Ashley Tree Service Edward L. Moe Shadywood Tree Experts Motion carried unanimously. ATTORNEY'S REPORT Proposed Controlled Substance Ordinance Council received the proposed Ordinance and the report from Police Chief Young on the Ordinance. After discussion, Haugen moved to table indefinitely. Motion carried. Rudolph Miller Tennis Court Request Mr. Miller of 26710 Edgewood Road submitted a revised request to place his tennis court 50 feet from the tarred surface of Edgewood Road. Attorney Larson indicated that the City had no additional right-of-way and we did not own any- thing more than the tarred surface. Council instructed the building inspector to issue the permit in accordance with City regulations. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT Clerk Kennelly reviewed the activities of the International Municipal Clerks Conference held in San Deigothe week of May 19th, 1984. Many thanks were given to the Council for the opportunity to attend this Conference. MAYOR'S REPORT Assessor Discussion Hennepin County submitted a letter notifying us of the cost of $20,000 for assessor fees for 1985. Shaw di.scussed with Manager Madigan from Excelsior the advantages and disadvantages of obtaining an "in house" assessor. Council instructed the Clerk to place an ad for an "in house" assessor and inform the County of our interest in bidding out the position. Amesbury Plowing Request A letter was received from snow removal and sanding. differently than any other McNulty Construction Co. requesting first priority in Council indicated that they will be treated no roads in the City. DNR Lake Access A letter was received informing the Council that the DNR is trying to obtain a public access on Christmas Lake, this lake is high "priority on their list. . REGU~OUNCIL MEEtING TUESD~ MAY 29, 1984 Page Five Mayor's Report, continued: Finance Department Memo A request from the Finance Department informing the Council of an error in the budget of additional funds of $29,000 over what is needed to pay the Metro Waste Commission for deferred payments was recommended to be transferred to off- set the water fund deficit. Council felt this would not allow an accurate accounting of this fund. Finance Director Beck informed the Council of the increasing nonpayment of taxes which includes nonpayment of special assessments. She would like to request a special audit of the special assessment funds. $2500 has been budgeted for a bond study. . RESOLUTION NO. 32-84 Haugen moved, seconded by Stover to approve the expenditure of $2000 for this special assessment audit, if additional funds are needed, a later request will be needed. Motion carried. Clarification of Benefits Clarification of what type of benefits can be covered by CDBG - Codification of Ordinance, for Julie Story will be reviewed with Larry Blackstad, Administrator of CDBG Funds. Rascop moved, seconded by Haugen to reallocate funds from the General Budget to cover the time Story has charged against general officeproc~dures with the recommendation to have more time put in on the Codification procedure. Motion carried. COUNCIL REPORTS Liquor Store Request Council approved new signage in accordance with the City Ordinance for Shorewood Liquor Store I. Motion carried. if ~~~~~~ ~:;;~~d~econded by Haugen to officially retain a Liquor Store consultant. j?~ Park Commission Report ~ ~ Shaw reported on the continuing planning for the Festival of Parks. . A request ~;~~ from the Park Commission was made to be able to review recommendations for ~ . ~ / =~:k p~:~~~:~i~~~.:~:~.PT~d o;J)te::;JJr~vf~ p!9tv' Shenehon/Goodlund Division ~ ~ ~~. Attorney for the Shenehon/Goodlund parties has offered additional easement along Shady Island Road to service the City lift station. No action was taken. Planning Commission Report Stover reported on the 6-1 approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment and rezoning to P.U.D. on the Trivescoproposal. .> . REGU_COUNCIL MEETING TUES ,MAY 29, 1984 Page Six . Council Reports, continued: Finance Committee Report Committee questioned whether a new census should be pursued to obtain additional road aide monies if a population of over 5,000 can be proven and submitted to the State by October 1, 1984.. Needs Assessment Policy on road is not completed and the October 1, 1984 deadline could not be met. The Committee would like direction from Council. Council suggested adding more members. Michael Fonte was suggested. Review Audit Report and compare 1983 Budget to 1984. Also do additional work that would not require the Finance Director!l; time. Liquor. Lease - Store II Council reviewed the lease submitted by Ryan Construction for the lease of Store II. Attorney Larson to review and make a recommendation. Water Policy Discussion Council discussed the criteria for implementing a "Water Policy". Areas of of importance will be: financing; user charges; cost of improvement; bonding capacity; etc. Suggested conditions for extensions to water system: 1) New developments would be required to supply municipal water connections or an adaptable central system where a development can support 10 or more lots. 2) Municipal system extensions for developed areas would be made where economically feasible as petitioned by % (suggested percentage) of the property owners in that area. These areas would be required to hookup and would all be assessed for the improvement. 3) As water extension pass by existing homes to new developments, these existing homes would be assessed for trunk lines but not assessed for laterals until the owners want to accept the assessment or until they choose to hookup to the system, no connections will be made without being assessed. Council will continue to discuss further policies prior to implementation. APPROVAL OF CLAIMS AND ADJOURNMENT Haugen moved, seconded by Gagne, to approve claims for payment to be followed by adjournment at 12:15 AM. Motion carried unanimously. General Fund (Acct. #00166) Checks 28722 - 28774 $28,327.36 Liquor Fund (Acct. #00174) Checks 2099 - 2127 $15,791.07 Respectfully submitted, Mayor Sandra L. Kennelly City Clerk SLK:pr .~ -~ .:~ ..-. '" CITY OF SHOREWOOD AUDIT REVIEW TUESDAY, MAY 19, 1984 COUNCIL CHAMBERS 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD 6:30 P.M. AUDIT REVIEW CALL TO ORDER The Audit Review meeting for the City of Shorewood was called to order at 7:00 PM, Tuesday, May 29, 1984 in the Council Chambers. Present were Mayor Rascop; Councilmembers Gagne, Haugen, Shaw, and Stover; also staff members, Finance Director Beck and Clerk Kennelly. Jim Maiser, City Auditor with Matthias, Roebke & Maiser reviewed the Audit letter and explained and answered questions asked by the Council. The Liquor Store audit will be reviewed at a later date. Audit meeting adjourned at 7:50 PM. i " ~, I bi. . . MAYOR RobertRascop COUNCIL Jan HlIugen Tad SMw Krlstl Stover Robert Gagmt CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD . SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 · (612) 414-3236 MEMORANDUM TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: BRAD NIELSEN DATE: 8 JUNE 1984 RE: FENCE PERMIT - SUSAN MORGAN!LINDA SCOTT FILE NO.: 404 (general) Enclosed please find an application for a fence permit for property located at 5235 Shady Lane (see Site Location, Exhibit A, attached). The request is explained in a letter from the applicant to the City Council, dated 5 June 1984 (see Exhibit B, attached). A site sketch (Exhibit C) illustrates the following: South boundary - 6 foot cedar privacy fence. East boundary and 89\ feet of the north boundary ~ 42 inch chain link fence. Interior fence from north boundary to house - 42 inch cedar privacy fence. Based upon the proposed plan and the provisions of Ordinance. 107, the request requires Council approval and signed approval of the neighbors adjoining the 6 foot portion of the fence (see Exhibit D, attached). A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore .JIbtk . Lot 22 \~'\ 0- DC Q1 : .... ..1: ~~ ~, ;.\....\~...'\ ~fjII. ~o. t! (J~ Z) Af' A ,. ~I ~\ 1n ~.el'\ I. {"',"S"L~ ,....~ 1'9~~~ \ (1"'\ ~- ;L;--~~ 'I.~~ (.. I ., ,,~.\~. . ~ ~\ 11,' i:~~!~ ~;) . ~ ~ I 0-/7;' 19J8s-lt' . .. '\ : :._~.."""".:7 , . :t...ot 4 .-- , . :#~. -:1/ = ..,-' .' .' . - ,. - "..- . . . S" ... - . "'" .. 0::. a .. C"t .... '" ,..., ~ .~) .') ,,33tJ. ~ ': . ----------.---. - reques'l; ~) , ) . - _. --..-.-...... 0/" 1 "., f"ll\o'" ~,' ~,.\ " \" . '-~ ~ a ~. i 21 ~ 0)- 0.... ~- "'u a:: o % (It ... o "" i ..J = 'r .. . !.~. ; (1( '- () <:i '" \t ~ . . ('\J C\J . 0:: ... l"- I-': ... () r<) . .. ." ......l l.1,J fr). .J i ~ z ~..J . J~ .c.) V) ~. ....~ .; t .I -; \. -.. ..-e' "". ...... .,.......~....' :.........,.Yl'...~._...V.('.....,.,.,-: 1':.";';; .... ...:. " , " .. .. Shorewood City Hall 5755 Country Cl ubRct. Shorewood, MH 55331 Dear Council Members: Susan E.. Morgan _ ~t Exhi. bit B REQUEST LETTER FROM APPLICANT SusaB E. Morgan:.. Linda A.. Scott' 5235 Shady Lane.;.:. . Shorwood,' ~ '55331.: , " ::.:::-:.... ==---. " I,. g ~ ~ ~~'~'f' ~. ~ '\ { i~.1 J i...l:-.-. .~Z..\.: ~ 1 ,~- ~.. 7.// · .. ~~"'4 l- M - ~'.' '. ............ ~~ . J if it ~{ ~ Exhibit C PROPOSED FENCE LOCATIONS :::---.. 1 - 0& '"\ ;' ~- ., j , '+f . ,~ i I f f .1 .. , J ~ J , ; 1 f ., J ~ t!i~ .' II . . . . . June 5,1984 Shorewood City Counci~ Shorewood, MN 55331 Dear Council: We, the neighbors at 5255 Shady lane are aware of the six foot high red cedar privacy fence being considered for .construction on the southern property line of 5235 Shady lane. We, the undersigned, do not object to the type, height, location of the fence-to be constructed. . Signed . Exhibit D LETTER OF AGREEMENT FROM ADJOINING PROPERTY"OWNER '" . . CITY OF SII()REW()()J) MAYOR Robert Rascop COUNCIL Jan Haugen Tlld Shaw Alexander Leonardo Robert Gagne ADMINISTRATOR Doug Uhrhammer 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAO.SHOREWOOD. MINNESOtA 55331 .. (612) 474-3236 MEMORANDUM TO: PLANNING COMMISSION MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: BRAD NIELSEN DATE: 29 MAY 1984 RE: RIDINGER, MRS. A.T. - SIMPLE SUBDIVISION FILE NO.: 405 (84.14) BACKGROUND Mrs. A.T. Ridinger, 5530.Howard's Point Road, has requested approval of a simple subdivision to divide her property into two lots. The property is located just north of Edgewood Road on the west side of Howard's Point Road (see Site locatipnmap, Exhibit A, attached). Exhibit B illustrates how the lot is proposed to be divided. The property is ~oned R-t, Single Family, contains approximately 110,000 square feet in area and is occupied by a single family residence. ANALYSIS/RECOMMENDATION Mrs. Ridinger's request is one of the easiest with which the Gityhas had to deal in quite some time. Despite the house being located >too near the water, both lots will conform to the area, width and depth requirements of the R-1 District. There are, however, two minor issues which should be addressed by the City_ 1. Howard's Point Road is substandard in right-of-way width._ The half-section map shows the r.o.w. as 40 feet. As in past subdivision requests, the City should acquire the necessary ease... ments wherever possible to bring the r.o.w. up to City standards. Since it would not be fair to acquire the entirelO feet needed to make Howard's Point Road 50 feet wide from the applicant's property, the. City .should acquire five feet.. at this time. This should not diminish-the required area of either lot. A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore . . MEMO FROM THE PLANNER MRS. A.T. RIDINGER-SIMPLE SUBD. 29 MAY 1984 Page Two 2. According to the applicant's survey, there is a small shed located near the southern boundary of the property. Since the southerly lot will not have a principal structure, the shed will become a nonconforming use. As such it should be removed from the site or moved to the northerly lot. Subject to the above request be approved. prepared showing the should also u :~f~<;~~.lr~'!flii'< ., :\)~..... .. ~.,J,na..."''Y fee. prior to The division should be recorded receipt of the resolution. requirements it is recommended that the applicant's The applicant should be directed to have a survey two lots and their legal descriptions. The applicant ment of the resolution approving the division. with the County within 30 days of her As a final note it should be explained that due to the lack of variances, the request does not require a public hearing. BJN:pr cc: Sandy Kennelly Gary Larson Jim Norton Mrs. A.T. Ridinger I _T - I . . . " Jto~ft'/ . tt'\ OdU-tIOf'\ f- :: 411 :- , 7HZ 'R~ 47 , _ I ~ ''''''''-Ee6EWQEl& -" '-If!8 Res. ,_ ( / -" ~.M" b l n() recard 0 .~::"~ //R()8d k4v~/ed 1.1 'dedIcation) Ej. ~ ~.~ . , (oo", i . ... Cr": .... t.-.... --" -.- t-: en (\J () LiJ en (w1utCAL J))) ~i~i ii' I 1 Y EI S~RvEYOR COUNTY. OUNTY,MINN. HENNEPIN C Exhibit A . SITE LOCAT~ON e subdivis~on R. din""er s~mpl L~ 0 tot 8 'y'~ dt . I'Olntl en st art. a.a,. 'I Mer......t com 13- 47' West . ~ "et. 186.4 feet '63.8 '._,IIOr'. <qt.. .'M4ttonka, "J .{ ') ; .~ f f:' !''''If (~~ '. ., '.' "::... \J: W. hert&y crt' fy '\:- COI"'rect reF"senti ~ bound.,.,.. of the " '\ of the toeat Ion oi th.reon, end et ,., eny, frO'tl or- on:., . . " ;1..r~"" .,; ; ~ -- ~$ , . '.."6='- 0/ . "-=>.-"'" ,.... '. \ . I ') ~\ ....../ \ \ \ , \\1\ \ , , \ \i \, " \ \ \ - \ \ \ ct. ~ "7: ...... ~- \\l -Z 'Z , - '"X- ...,... .....~.,.. ..~.'. \ / #lJ.6Jt'" ....,r~ . -----I//.:.~~--- - ,-" /'I /, vI/~n \ '\\ ). -~ ~. ~ --\ \ , . \ \ \t \~ \0 \ ' ..../ .; l'Jxhi bit B PROPOSED LOT SPLIT s "\.;-, ":l~,' Dated thh !atd de)' tI t(WC. FiEl StJW bf .lk~4 . . CITY OF SHOREWOOD . PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING TUESDAY, JUNE 5, 1984 .. COUNCIL.MBERS 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD 7:30 PM MINUTE S CALL TO ORDER Chairman Bruce Benson called the meeting to order at 7:40 PM. ROLL CALL Present: Chairman Bruce Benson, Commissioners Mary Boyd. Janet Leslie,FrankReese, Bob Shaw (9:25); Planner Brad Nielsen; Acting Council Liaison Jan.Haugen and Deputy Clerk Sue Niccum. Absent: Commissioners Vern Watten and Richard Spellma.n APPROVAL OF MINUTES -MAY 15, 1984 Commissioner Leslie asked about the old shed on the piece of property to be divided and was told it will come down. Commissioner Reese asked about the sewer hookup. Planner Nielsen said there shouldn't be any problems. Reese moved, Benson seconded, to approve the subdivision request subject to the requi.rements in the Planner's Report. Motion carried unanimously. VARIANCE REQUEST - REAR YARD SETBACK ~ RICHARD GAY - 5480 COVINGTON ROAD .:#-7. Mr. Gay appeared before the Commission to request a 15 foot rear yard setback to .build a new home on his. property. He presented a model of the house and lot. He said one of the reasons for his reque.St is the existing driveway easement through the Southeast: corner of the lot, which limits the useful building area. He also mentioned the following: The area where he wishes to build is the only open area. He would lil<e.topreserve the trees which provide privacy, wildlife and a natural noise barrier~ With the house situated this way, the sewer can be run ina straight<150 line to the house. An NSP utility easement of 10' to 15' runs along the southerly lot line~ The existing land contours provide a perfect site for the plannedwalk9ut. The requested variance allows for the best all around lot use including the south side where a double garage is eventually planned for storage of Classic cars. The garage would be installed among the trees in a natural setting. This is an upper bracket area where homes and lots are not considered conventional. He wishes to retain as much of the natural surroundings as possible while blending t!te structures into their surroundings. . PLANNIN~MMISSION MINUTES TUESDAY, June 5, 1984 page two Mr. Gay did mention the fact that the Peterson property, with 5 new homes going in, abuts his property on the westerly side. Planner Nielsen mentioned that the Peterson propery has covenants involved and suggested a covenant on Mr. Gay's property. Leslie moved, Boyd seconded, to recommend to Council to approve the variance for the 15 foot rear yard setback on the condition that the front yard setback is increased to 65 feet with the requirement that there be no assessory use, building or outSide storage in the back yard setback area. Motion carried unanimously. VARIANCE REQUEST - EXPANSION OF A NONCONFORMING STRUCTURE - KEITH BEDFORD - #- g' 24375 WOOD DRIVE Mr. Bedford was present to explain to the Commission that he wished to build a 14' x 24' deck on the back of his house. Planner's Report noted that the proposed deck win conform to the setback require- ments of the current standards and will not increase the nonconformity of the existing house. Benson moved, Reese seconded, to recommend to Council to approve the variance requested for the expansion of a nonconfroming structure. Motion carried unanimously. PLANNING COMMISSION ATTENDANCE Acting Council Liaison Haugen announced that the Council feels it will be of great value if the Planning Commission members that cannot attend the meeting will can Sue prior to the meeting and let her know they will not be there and why. Staff requested to put the above on the bottom of the agenda. *******PLANNING COMMISSION NOTE: THE JULY 3 MEETING HAS BEEN RESCHEDULED FOR JULY 10 WITH THE UNDERSTANDING THAT IF NOTHING COMES IN FOR THAT MEETING, THE MEETING WILL BE CANCELLED. REPORTS Acting Council Liaison Jan Haugen reported on the Council meeting of May 29. Administrator - Daniel Vogt, of Rogers, Minnesota, will take over as the new City Administrator on July 9th. Ordinance For Expansion of Nonconforming Structure as long as the Nonconformity is not enchanced - passed Rapid Oil 4-1 vote passed with a 23 foot setback and condition that the building will be designed differently than the usual white with the brilliant orange stripe. It will be done in earth tones. Liquor/Beer Licenses - approved providing they have proper insurance documentation. Tree Bids - awarded. . PLANNIN.OMMISS ION . MINUTES TUESDAY, JUNE 5, 1984 page three Controlled Substances - tabled indefinately. Rudolph Miller - ':rennis Court - Mr. Miller changed his setback to comply with being 50 feet from the tarred surface of the road. Therefore, no variance was required. Trivesco - Council decided to handly the Comprehensive Plan Arnendmentand tJ:1e Concept Stage of a Planned Unit Development (P.U.D.) at the same time. The idea of the "C<ittle Company'" restaurant caused the most controversy. John Uban stated that the "Cattle Company" was only used as an example as>the type of restaurant. The whole area would have to be parking lot. and there would not be any room for the other buildings planned for that area. Board of Review - becuaseof problems with the present assessor, the Council is seriouslyconsicleringcontracting their own assesSOr. 3rdAvenue Apartments -The City of Excelsior has agree.d to. work with the City of Shorewood in correcting the existing problems. 8:30 PUBLIC HEARING- COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT AND CONCEPT STAGE OFA PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (P.U.D.) -SHOREWOOD OAKS Mr. Geoff Martin, of Howard Dahlgren Assiciates, made the presentation for Shorewood Oaks. As a result of the April 3rd meeting, they are now proposing the following: 96 single family units, .29townhouses,4.4 acres of open space with 30 foot trail easements to Freeman Park, 2 entrances - State Highway 7 and Strawberry Lane, and a dedication of an additional 17 foot r.o.w. for the future upgrading of Strawberry Lane. Streets will have a 50 foot r.o.w.and a 30 foot tarred surface. The density is 3.03 per acre. a 6' to 8 '.berm will be located along the east property line as a buffer between Shorewood Oaks and Freeman Park. They are requesting a 5 foot garage setback and a 10 foot house. setback. Shorewood Oaks agreed to fillow all City Engineer Norton's recommendations regarding sewer and water. Discussion - Public Portion of Meeting Margaret Osha - 25849 Hi~hway 7 Q. When you lower the water table, what happens to my well? A. We are only lowering the table down to about 4 feet, your well is W<iY below that depth. Q. Do we have to hookup to sewer when it is put in? A. It is a City Policy to hook people in the viCinity of sewer up to the system, however, this will have to be a Council decision, as expert advice will be needed from the Engineer, etc. Q. What about the traffic level? A. The predicted amount of daily trips is 1200. . PLANNIN!ltOMMISSION MINUTES TUESDAY, JUNE 5, 1984 page four Q. Where will all the wildlife go? A. Hard to say, Freeman Park will have a fairly good sized area left wild. Marion Johnson - Strawberry' Lane Q. What about West 62nd Street? A. The idea is to vacate the part running along the southern edge of the Shorewood Oaks property. Currently, this is not being used as road. Q. Who does the Environmental Itnpact Study? A. A form is provided by EQB (Environmental Quality Board). Mrs. Thomson - 26240 West 62nd Street Q. Will they be puting in curbs on Strawberry Lane? A. Not yet. Q. Are we drilling their welL for them? A. No Pam Johnson Q. What is the average Lot size? A. 10.900 Square feet. Margaret Osha - 25840 Highway 7 Q. What is the height and width of the berm along Freeman Park? A. It will vary - 6' t08 'high and 24' to 30' wide. Several neighbors expressed serious concern regarding the drainage on 'this project, as several ofthem.already have problems due to the high water table in the area and they want to make sure that this doesn't increase their problems even more. Present were Margaret and Bob Osha, Marion Johnson, Pam Johnson, Mr. and Mrs. Steve ,Thomson, and a few others who didn't give a, name. It was explained to examine all aspects Watershed District. met or exceeded. the neighbors that the City Engineer williverythorou$hly of the drainage plan, which will then be reviewed by the It will not be installed until all specifications are Public Portion of the meeting was closed at 9:35 PM. ENGINEER' S REPORT Plan'ner Nielsen reported the following, after a telephone conference ,with the City Engineer, Jim Norton. Sanitary Sewer adequate to serve the protect MWCC approval for c.onnectionto interceptor . . PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES TUESDAY, JUNE 5, 1984 page five ENGINEER'S REPORT - continued Water requires City policy decision temporary connection to Chanhassen is one solution Storm Sewer everyone should realize that the detention pond in Freeman Park will be subject to planned inundation Strawberry Lane problems will require some City work - question as to how its paid for pipe from project to an area drain catch basin paid for by petitioning residents general fund? Also subject to Watershed District recommendation Streets continuous right turn lane starting east of Freeman Park entry streets within to be designed for 30 mph - need horizontal and vertical curve data A written Engineer's Report will be sent to the Planning Commission. Discussion - Commission Q. Will there be two Homeowner's Associations, one for single family and one for townhouses? A. Probably only one. Q. What about the noise level? A. That has not been determined, it will be answered in the EAW. Q. Could you give us some information on the townhouses? A. (Mr. Johnson) The 29 townhouses will be 3, 4 or 5 units per building. They will be for sale and it is unlikely that, with the expense involved, they will.be rented out. They will probably be tri-level with no basement. Two-thirds of the single family units will be 2 bedroom (with expansion room for 2 more). Q. Have you had a neighborhood meeting? A. Yes, only 3 people attended. . . .. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING TUESDAY, JUNE 5, 1984 page six Discussion - Commission (co;tinued) Q. How will the project be phased? A. Streets and sewers all at once; houses, we are considering trying to market in limited areas, possibly bringing in 4 or 5 more builders, all from Custom I. We (Johnson) will probably build the townhouses. Q. Is there any kind of warranty when building on swamp land? A. Yes, the state has regulations pertaining to warranties on new building, Custom I also has regulations that extend beyond state regulations. Motions Reese moved, Leslie seconded, to recommend to Council to approve the Comprehen- sive Plan Amendment for Shorewood Oaks. Motion carried unanimously. Leslie moved, Boyd seconded, to recommend to Council to approve the Concept Stage for the Planned Unit Development (P.U.D.). Motion carried unanimously. Reese moved, Benson seconded, to recommend to Council to approve the Single Family Development Stage subject to the following: 1. Townhouses - the plans and covenants are to be reviewed by the Planning Commission. 2. Reports from MnDOT and the City Engineer regarding the egress to Highway 7. 3. Sewer and water available to adjacent users on Highway 7 and Strawberry Lane. 4. Something in writing from the City of Chanhassen, concerning the water hookup, stating their willingness and terms. 5. Following all the Engineer's recommendations. 6. Following all Watershed District recommendations. 7. EAW completed. 8. Following all recommendations in the Planner's Report. Motion carried unanimously. MATTERS FORM THE FLOOR none ADJOURNMENT Boyd moved, seconded by Shaw, to adjourn at 10:35 PM. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED sue nic.c.u.rrr) Deputy Clerk . . . LEGAL NOTICE PUBLIC REARING CITY OF SHOREWOOD NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Shorewood will hold a Public Hearing in the Council Chambers of the Shorewood City Hall, 5755 Country Club Road, Shorewood, Minnesota, on Monday 11 June, 1984 at 8:00 P.M., or as soort thereafter as possible. The purpose of the Hearing is to consider a request by Richard Gay for a rear yard setback variance on property located at 5480 CovingtonRoad,said property legally described as: Lot 1, Block 1, Noel Wood Addition P.I.D.# 36-117-23-21-0004 Note: The Planning. Commission will review the request at its meeting on Tuesday, 2 June 1984, in the Council Chambers of the Shorewood City Hall. The Commission meets at 7:30 P.M. All interested parties are encouraged to attend. Oral and written comments will be considered at that time. City of Shorewood SANDRA KENNELLY . City Clerk To be published 28 May 1984 IX- . . . CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD e SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 e(612. 474-3236 MAYOR RobertR$Clp COUNCIL . Jan Haute" Tad Shaw Alexender Leonardo RobertGegne ADMINISTRATOR Doug Uhrhemmer MEMORANDUM TO: PLANNING COMMISSION, MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: BRAD NIELSEN DATE: 30 MAY 1984 RE: GAY, RICHARD - SETBACK VARIANCE FILE NO.: 405 (84.13) BACKGROUND Mr. Richard Gay has requested a 15 foot rear yard setback to build a new home on his property located at 5480 Covington Road (see Site Location map, Exhibit A, attached). The property is zoned R-1, Single Family Residential and is currently unoccupied except for a blacktop driveway through the property to the lot ~outh. The applicant cites the 20 foot easement, over which the driveway is located, as the primary reason for the variance request. Exhibit B shows his proposed site plan in relation to required and requested setbacks. A'NALYSIS!RECOMMENDATION As shown on Exhibit B, the applicant wishes to place t.heproposed house 15 feet into the required 50 foot rear yard in order to keep the house 15 feet away from the existing driveway easement. Despite two factors which tend to support the variance request, the variance is largelY the result of the particular design of the proposed house. One of the applicant's primary reasons for reql.lesting a variance is to create some space between the house and the driveway. It should be noted, however, that in doing so the house is moved 15 feet closer toa street which will serve five homes in the Robert S.C. Peterson Addition. The Peterson project is the second factor favoring the variance. Houses in that project will be clustered and have been allowed to be as. close as 35 feet from the r.o.w. A Residtmtial CJJmmunity on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore 10., .. . MEMO~OM THE PLANNER GAY, RICHARD - SETBACK VARIANCE 30 MAY 1984 Page Two In spite of these factors the question must be asked as to whether a reasonablyslzed home could be built within the buildable area of the lot. The answer is that,yes, a house with a more conventional floor plan could easily fit within the setbacks. With some rearrangement, the proposed floor plan even fits (see Exhibit C). Thus, despite the existing driveway and the reduced setbacks in the Peterson project, the applicant's request does not meet the test for variance approval. While it is suggested that approval not be granted, if for some reason the City feels the request is reasonable, then the front yard setback should be increased to 65 feet, in which case the applicant will not be granted greater privilege than other property owners in theR-1 District. BJN:pr cc: Sandy Kenne 11 y Jim Norton Gary Larson Richard Gay Sue Niccum 1I.....~..1/2..._.-5EC.;.J @ . .. w:rt~ , ... \_.'1 ,"C'~ ~ ~ _ . L...",~~H R'CS.."'. ... ~O'~"'" Z'17 -C"'''':'SI''\' ' .'. I' '0.,. "', .~ ~ ". ~ ~ \\ ~ '......- . , ....f '. I J'" , ~;. '.. I'D ..... r -."--.__ ~"'.~ , ~~7'O' ,.... r....r ,....,... .......,.... .. ..J" ~.: ~ ....,1. '-- ""'" ............ ;68 CEMETERY 0' THE RESURRECTION ..lti 1 En ....424" CEMETERY OF. THE \ ~RESURRECTION ....0;::. . .... . ....- .' : i......... Ch""~ t fV\Q.~ LQ. "- '-. 5(JJIO Of he Exhibit A SI.rE LOCA'rION Gay variance ~equest SECOND ~ \..) . . (5) '9..t=:.0 . . 11 I" = 50' h'bit B .r Ex 1 SITF' PLAl~ PROPOSED .l:I ~.. ~ ~. ~"""""""'#J1II_'-'- ,;.......,.. "........ ,..... :........~ '. '.:~ ........ "'" ~- '" . i. . 6.S{ Y ,:!//e. . .~ ~ ~/L~~ '~ , ~ ~ ~ -- ~. d- _~__. 2-____~.:...__.~~___,__ ~~.- ~~. - ._~--.--..- .,i.:", . . LEGAL NOTICE PUBLIC HEARING CITY OF SHOREWOOD NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the Cityof$horewood will hold a Public Hearing in the Council Chambers of the Shorewood City Hall, 5755 Country Club Road, Shorewood, Minnesota, on Monda~ 11 June, 1984 at 8:15 P.M., or as soon thereafter as possible. The purpose of the Hearing is to consider a request by Keith Bedford for a variance to expand a nonconforming structure. on property located at 24375 Wood Drive, said property legally described as: Lot 15, Block 1, Club Terrace Addition P.I.D.# 33-117-23-44-0013 Note: The Planning Commission will review the request at its meeting on Tuesday, 3 June, 1984, in the Council Chambers of the Shorewood City Hall. The Commission meets at 7:30 P.M. All interested parties are encouraged to attend. Oral and written comments will be considered at that time. City of Shorewood SANDRA KENNELLY City Clerk To be published 28 May 1984 ~a.: .. . . '" . .CITYOF SlIOR.EWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAO-SHOREWOOO, MINNESOTA 55331 - (612) 474-3236 MAYOR Robert Ra8cOJ) . COUNCIL. """HauIlJ8t'l Ted Stlew Ale)(andef .L.eonlllrdo Robert Gagne AOM1NlSTRATOR O~9 Uhthammet MEMORANDUM TO: PLANNING COMMISSION, MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: BRAD NIELSEN DATE: 29 MAY 1984 RE: BEDFOJID, KEITH - VARIANCE TO EXPAND A NONCONFORMING STRUCTURE FILE NO.: 405 (84.12) BACKGROUND / Mr. Keith Bedford has requested a building permit,to.add a deck to th~ rear of his house, located at 24375 Wood Drive (see Site Location map, Exhibit A, attached). As can be seen on Exhibit B, the existing house is approximately 9 feet from the easterly lot line and 26 feetf,l;om the street right-of-way. Since the setbacks forthe'R-1 ZoningPistdct in which the property is. located are 50 feet for the front yard and 10 feet for side yards, the applicant's house constitutes a nonconforming structure. Section 10 of our current Ordinance states that nonconforming structures shall not be expanded. As a consequence Mr. Bedford has requested a variance. ANALYSIS/RECOMMENDATION According to our records the applicant's house was built in 1972 at which time the zoning standards for single family residential were similar to our currentR-2,District requirements. The year after the house was built, the City changed its standards but neglected to p.roperly zone the area in which Mr. Bedford's home was located. This does not, howeyer, explain why the house ended up being 26 feet from the road instead of 35 feet. which was required in 1972. As you know the proposed1"lew Zoning Ordinance provides .more flexibility with regard to expansion of nonconforming single family homes. Specifi- cally, such structure,s maybe expanded, by conditional use permit, as long as the nonconformity is not increased. As an interim ,"asure, until the new Ordinance is adopted, the City has adopted Ordinance No. 159 allowing such situations to be handled through a variance procedure. . A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore 55", . . . MEMO FROM THE PLANNER RE: KEITH BEDFORD - VARIANCE TO EXPAND A NONCONP'ORMING STRUCtURE 29 MAY 1984 Page Two The applicant's request is a good example. of how the new Ordinance proVisions are intended to be used. The proposed deck will conform to the setback requirements of the current standards and will not increase the nonconf()rmity of the existing house. If the request was being processed under the terms of the new Ordinance, one of the conditions to be considered.would bea setback trade...off. That is, whereagivansetback isreducedbelowthat which is required, the City may require additional setback on the op.posite $ide. In . Mr. Bedford's case, for example, instead of a 50!oot rear yard. 'the City could require that a 74 .footrear yard setback be maintained to make up for the 24 foot setback reduction in the front. Similarly, an 11 foot setbatkcould be required on the westerly side to makeup for the 9 foot setback on the easterly side. The. intent of such requirements would be to maintain the amount of open space required by the Ordinance and that in granting the vai-iance (or conditional. use . permit) the City would not be allowing the applicant more rights than other property owners within the same zoning district.' In Mr. Bedford's particular case, these additional requirements may be somewhat academic. Due.to the fact that the lot was platted into a pond, an automat:icsetback of approximately 220 feet is established at the rear of the lot. Also, given the proximity of the northwest corner of the house to the street, expansion of house westward is quite limited. Based upon the preceding, it is suggested that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the. variance with no special conditions attached. BJN:pr cc: S~ndy Kennelly Gary Larson Jim Norton Keith Bedford Sue Niccum · "S.9~ C I"~ 1.. Z . ..., i t/>/ I -. ~ I ~./1 ~ 1\":_,- /i'~~ - ()' rn ~ ~"-' -<::: ~o~ .. "'I t ""' ~ N ........... "::)- ;:- ~ ~ .c - ~ ....~ 1::\ ,. s. ...f' , _.-;;~ s~::> .r~ .fA ~ (.of "c- .=.; ;-> - - ",I :: -- --~ - I I ~ ~ I :!:;/ (" " ~ ~ Cl6 "" ~ - '\ 4'4{ ~ os. /\0 - lIl. Exhibit A SITE LOCATION Bedford variance request L'''it L- 1\ . I '."'1 .. ' '" '1" "'..Ill.':>I"'.. .. ~I... .' I t .....:l . ;.. I - -. ....... .""ne onn"" 1-'!!!G f.~~fd!F 84219 33 117 23 .- z 5300 HIGHWAY 101 SOUTH MINNETONKA. MINNESOTA 55343 Keith Bedford JOB NUMBER SEC/TWP/RN CLIENT STANDARD SYMBOLS "0" Denotes 1/2" 10 pipe with plastic plug bearing State Registration No. 9235, set. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 15, Block 1, CLUB TERRACE ..... Denotes iron monument found. ,,+.. Denotes cross chiseled in concrete surface. 5/16/84 5/ 21/84 40 DATE SURVEYED DATE DRAFTED SCALE IN FEET PER INCH "982x5" Denotes existing spot elevation measured at the point marked by "x", in this case, 982.5 feet above mean sea level. .1"982x5"IDenotes proposed spot elevation at the point marked by "x". " ---7" Denotes proposed direction of storm water runoff . PROPOSED ELEVATIONS!1one FIRST FLOOR TOP OF FOUNDATION GARAGE FLOOR LOWEST FLOOR SANITARY SEWER BENCHMARK ELEVATION CERTIFICATION 00 P' ~ co p.. I hereby certify that this plan, survey, report or specification was prepared by me and that I am a duly Registered Land Surveyor and Profes- sional Engineer under the La'fl~ of the Stat Minnesota. \...: ~ ' J es H. Parker, Minn. Reg. No. 9235 BENCHMARK DESCRIPTION: 4 >,Pd ~ I-:! ::0 '..... 00.... "d '1:J t-'. 01:10' 00 ::Q t-'. co8c+ p..>-<:tJj p..tn ~~ :>;-'<1 trJ 00>-<: P' o S ljt ... ,,~. ,~~ ,- o ~4, roO)' t.c" k ~.,l>< ~~. ,tJc<i, / o -.,'? 0) c{ tJc't'\,'?' T ~;~ (l" ..1-.-/ 'l.\--- __ \'I..'="';'t\~. - o~~ -.I C;. ,1 r, ..' 'I..-;\.1~tt\~. " -IO?~ s.\ . LEGAL NOTICE PUBLIC HEARING CITY OF SHOREWOOD . NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Shorewood will hold a Public Hearing in the Council Chambers of the Shorewood City Hall, 5755 Country Club Road, Shorewood, Minnesota, on Monday, 11 June, 1984 at 8:30 P.M. or as soon thereafter as possible. The purpose of the Hearing is to consider a request by Trivesco, Inc. for a Comprehensive Plan amendment and rezoning from R-1, Single Family Residential, to P.U.D., Planned Unit Development for property between State Highway 7 and Covington Road west of Vine Hill Road, said property described as: Lots 31, 32, and 33, except Cartway, Auditor's Subdivision No. 141; and that part of Government Lot 4, Section 36, Township 117, Range 23, described as commencing at a point on the north line of said Government Lot 4, distance 308.5 feet east from the southeast corner of the northwest ~ of the northeast ~ said Section 36, thence south at right angle with said north line, distance 259.91 feet then deflecting right 107 degrees 32 minutes, 21 seconds, distance 474.18 feet, thence deflecting left 26 degrees 28 minutes, 21 seconds, to the northeasterly road right-of-way line of Covington Road, thence southeasterly along said road right-of-way, distance 311.93 feet to point of beginning of land to be described thence continuing southeasterly along said road right-of-way to the north line of the south 677.4 feet of said Government Lot 4, thence east along said north line to the east line of said Government Lot 4 thence north along the east lines of said Government Lot 4 and the northwest ~ of the northeast ~ of said Section 36 to the northeast corner of said northwest ~ of the northeast ~ thence west to the northwest corner thereof, thence south~ong the west line thereof to a line parallel with and distance 50 feet north from the south line of said northwest ~ of the northeast ~ thence east along said parallel line to a line parallel with and distance 100 feet east from the west line thereof, thence south along last described parallel line to the south line of said northwest ~ of the northeast ~ thence east along said south line to a point distance 308.5 feet east from the southwest corner thereof, thence south at right angle with said south line distance 259.91 feet thence southwesterly to beginning; and south ~ of northeast ~ of northeast ~ and that part of the north ~ of south ~ of northeast ~ of northeast ~ lying west of the east 300 feet thereof except road; and Tract C, R.L.S. #847 PID# 25-117-23-43-0002 36-117-23-12-0002 36-117-23-11-0002 and 0005 Oral and written comments will be considered at that time. City of Shorewood SANDRA KENNELLY City Clerk To be published 28 May 1984 ~9~ . . STEPHEN L. LARSON, M.D., P.A. tJ~~_af.:#~:y June 4, 1984 SUITE 600 SOUTHDAL.E MEDICAL. BL.DG. 65045 FRANCE AVE. SOUTH MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 550435 RIDGES HEAL.TH CENTER 200 EAST NICOL.L.ET BL.VD. BURNSVIL.L.E. MINNESOTA 55337 TEL.. 920-2200 Dear Shorewood City Council Members: On the 11th of June, there will be a Public Hearing regarding the Trivesco Development on the frontage road of Highway 7. Our neghborhood has significant concerns regarding this possible future development. (1) (2) There is much doubt in our minds as to whether commercial development on the frontage road is really necessary. , If a restaurant facility of the type of Cattle Company or Chi-Chi's is allowed, it certainly does not fit in with the residential character of our neighborhood. Do we want or need a restaurant that will serve such a large (and non-Shor:ewood) population? The restaurant will probably want to use the parking lots of the other three buildings, thereby increasing even more its size of clientele. You may be aware that the State Legislatune is toying with a bill to allow liquor establishments to remain open until 3:00 a.m. Lqstly, we all know that traffic on Covington Road and Radisson Road has been a problem for many years, and there is significant travel by people who do not live in the neighborhood. This type of restaurant facility would certainly make a bad situation worse. . (3) (4 ) (5) I and the neighborhood area urge you to look carefully at this proposal. We certainly welcome additional residential neighbors. However, we are not interested in the full service liquor-restaurant facility in our neighborhood that would prima~serve people coming off of Highway 7. Sincerely, MiI~ " .' /)/ . . MEMO HOWARD DAHLGREN ASSOCIATES, INC. One Groveland Terrace. Suite 102. Minneapolis. Minnesota 55403 Phone .377-3536 TO Brad Nielsen, City Planner DATE 8 June 1984 CITY OF SHOREWOOD SUBJECT Trivesco Enclosed please find a revised Page 5 for the Planned Unit Development Proposal and Comprehensive Plan Amendment for Trivesco. C. John Uban F~... Ml6-Nn 1'''_ O'Q..,;"'9 Ioo,d. II\(. iJoll ~5. Dallo... r...OI $iq~ , .. . . At the time the Highway 7 intersection has been approved and construction ordered by Mn/DOT, the multiple area will begin development. The commercial area will develop at about the time the interse~tio9 is being built. Stage 1 Single Family (30 units) Stage 2 Single Family (30 units) Stage 3 Single Family (30 units) Stage 4 Condominiums Stage 5 Commercial 1984 1985 1986 1985-87 1986-88 6. PUD DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY (REVISED JUNE 1984) Total Acres Total Right-of-Way Excess Collector R.O.W. Adjusted Right-of-Way Wetlands (filled) Net Acres Commercial -Building Coverage Single Family -Lots -Density -Average Lot Size Multiple Family (Total) -Multiple -Private Open Space -Units -Density ACTUAL ACREAGE CONVERTED SHOREWOOD ACREAGE (1 ACRE=40,OOO S.F.) 107.0 acres 15.1 acres 4.4 acres 10.7 acres 1.8 acres 116.5 acres 16.5 acres 4.8 acres 11.7 acres 1.9 acres 94.5 acres 102.9 acres 9.0 acres 60-80,000 s.f. 9.8 acres 63.6 acres 91 lots 1.4 units/acre 30,444 s.f. 69.3 acres 91 lots 1.3 units/acre 30,444 s.f. 21.9 acres 13.7 acres 8.2 acres 144 units 6.6 units/acre 23.85 acres 14.92 acres 8.93 acres 144 units 6.0 units/acre 8 Acres Adjacent to Shady, Hills 3.1 units/acre 2.9 units/acre Overall Residential Density 2.75 units/acre 2.52 units/acre 7. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT TEXT The addition of the commercial land use designation to the upper nine acres of the Trivesco land is reasonable because the traffic can be handled safely and efficiently without encumbering residential streets using the proposed collector and Highway 7 intersect~on as the main means of ingress and egress. The land is not suitable for residential because of the poor soil conditions and the close proximity of the highway. 5 .,1.:.;.11' E' S ,/ytJ"i M ct J cu" (1 () b "C. t'" + fL a:;' (() f t \ ~J e o,~ c ~ I vt-( ~'(,q 11 ~ l>---7 5McJt: l</uc;d. Clf) I-*^-I} 57 5l) C " (1.-1.-1, ~ ~'~ c- l '-llv n.. (1(l d .), ,....,-) 3 / (5 h c ~ -e u.' 0 0 d ,u IV ') D eO. v- rvt CY..\C' r 0--"-'\. d ~ C Cl.l.o\ (, j' I t'vi €. v-1. b "" ,'7 .'. '-.J J t ~l ,- ({ 0 h t 5> C.t 11 J <.'.(''''1 c/~ C!~ ~ I ' 'LO "I', IV\(.' to ef...p('~77 OC.LI," J /). .e 0. ~^ e '_)._ d ~_ L' e I () /J ~1-t "'-t.", f {)J /It l' c. /;l i5 I l--I-t Pi-t <i- J ,C:~ -/(.J 7 , t k.' f .'Y1 f)c'i) fd T r I cJ 't"~(.c., r. " I ut~,'~ r '., c-t.+ 5"3eCJ 5tlc~cl:; /-11'117. (fIre et t' ~ I.I {J.. c~"\+ 'i::u, 0 (( V", J\ c.' ~ -L., ' I- '. J . s.. ..J. L ~ . ~ '"' a..Jt~ '("r'? 0 ~ c:: Vl. "7 , s "1AIt e... V E:.. ,"'t.j f cJ Y I I vt::. t-{) e 5 e€ .. ,l J " d 5' 7 ~1 th~ t 4 )'\sld.e-t~ ri e/j e....to J01i~.t t- I 1,,1 c: U. u. r V'l<-} CL ~I\C C.{, 'J. " " " J ~ , '" -CIA A {/.LJ ~.c.f- b~L}. (..,1-1,,-1 <1.."7 1/.-1 t.: t-ve, Q ""'e.('0:~ 1'\0 V\ cJ t (; 'Y\ (,." VI e.,' V" ~ ~ (J "'-, 0 7' 1-' "'" , . " T' I J I t, '_ c:..1 i + ~ C. C/e' d J {i..'-! ck.A.- i ct-t.t d ~ /('-')1 tl i ~~ 1 J h e"1 r'-':{ U. ~(,L (0 ~ 1 Ct.4' of $ J 'J I ,J " t' " }".c eA. 6' /l (A1 -t.:.G' 0 u.. i/' Q<-.!1'l{ ~ v-t..t5 c.Gt1 J. tw-,"( Ii fe11f:d t1 c--c.~ (,(,7(:/ k) c . v 1 I , t.. 0 () (i. ,- r!. t:,1-"I-'\. ( t" ,"-1-t ~ ..'VI ,>'/'" k \ \A.j -5 (1-711 € t.. ~LC'~ u..1 ~ ~ t;. bu;{ -+ Ct ~ ,jJ () '-) ,~f \ () E. " , ,A A . (" d,'};l 0-<. d ~)( If-I f'\ 'f' 7 ~ ~ d {) Gl l/~ C<.n,\.. G ~ t!~ '5 f (i rVI ~Z t<...' I j~' (~'\ oJ-' ~ f t1k'-f t II- "- f cq. Y\; 'j Q ". Wi 1M i'S SIC^" (VI'\ d Qc;f!I-ed 'J" Ct '1'v\ t LIj ~~lld I e H Q v~ I I W041-f tel j'" ~ I \t\ ~(: rc ~ 5 I i II LV i -+ 1,-1 U. tj {- () ".-1/l t..{.: Ii'" Tr-- f (,J t7 L 0 hCk--t. f iY~fC)9 ~-d : I) tJ Q Me ~ Ii /I "' -<;] <!0vI C ~ ,~>1 eJ Cd if ~l 'U-e h f 6 h d ~ ~ I'.J.) d ((it I { 'j h ~, ! /Il a f a V,€ f t~ t 07 f J t<.! (. :) h t../,.v€" Jt{ U t^ ~ I V\ f"(I f fl r- f-:J t J _5 t" 1.1,'; r-; j t, f ~o /' a ~ec-<'G (A.. d'J CLC'~,\ '+ i [) .e? Yo. h I;,~ It t: ci 5 ho..e 00c' d ,.1 e \ ~h hfJ"" hOCI ds ? d-'\ W Q. ().ftAd ~ "5 fa-., d a~ f f'r;! f> J,:",~,\ c! t Hi e Vld t, e CMA ~ b us +I~ Ci ~ /.I"-'J /. ll"", a ,,~<. d I ,'''d ('J q dlj ~Gt,+ t: c ~ (JJ B 7 PJ~J h,<.\ + ~j~ (IV'L-t 'A--- k; ,~ h~~'\ e'j j .JJu..:f- ~'e dCI)1 ci 1- t; h , ~ It it i 9 f"t.1f (J,r-. Sc I"'- hu~; l4. €. 5St'~ v-' tt fc.. h LO ,'I / <<:11 Y'CJ.C. t- %..1/"'1-1. ~ ,tM ~~tc J fA.) {:, 0 tJJ ~c 1- i 0 c..O'v1/\. lttl. ~V'C /'0.. { (t ~ <.' zl ~ ."" J 5u.. '- Ii t~7 "5 Ie (' e 5, r- e fat J c cd Ii(<. h ~1- & I/' ~7 'Ie{ v~ '1--7 w h ,',-h ~..41.t~ ~ f ,,' C-cJ..( ~ 040- i V'eJ. '1-t'cfh'Ci h/~~ J<;";r:~'~~CJ~ 1.'Jc1Q' ~I'" ~ df- ~ t. ~ -f"; C ~ c "-z't (" "- t/'t VI. ;1 '6 k::,{ 'f, ~ v-e the (!.. /;..<:L 1;t.CJ ~7 fv( 11". t.,(, !a-).--t-1 (~ Eric P. Canton 2495 Willow Drive Hamel, MN 55340 June 8, 1984 Mayor, City Council Members Shorewood, MN RE: PROPOSED WATER SYSTEM FOR THE SOUTHEAST SECTOR, CITY OF SHOREWOOD Dear Ladies and Gentlemen, Installation of a community water system appears to be both economically and socially the most responsible act the City of Shorewood could undertake. My name is Eric Canton. I speak for Robert Sommer and the other owners of the proposed Covington Vine Ridge residential development site located at the intersection of Covington Road and Vine Hill Road. The Covington Vine Ridge site is approximately 42 acres in size. Individual men and women, families, and empty-nesters have all availability of quality housing in a price range they could afford. Shorewood has recognized the importance of these needs as they have Shorewood. Your approval of our concept and development stage plans reflect your recognition of the need to accomodate growth on a planned and secure basis, mindful of the standards for structural and aesthetic quality that have been the hallmark of Shorewood throughout its history. If you decide in favor of a municipal water system to serve this section of Shorewood, your decision would be socially responsible because it reflects the need to provide a community service to residents in a manner that permits the greatness amount of investment on the part of an individual homeowner to be in the aesthetic standards - the quality of life reflected in his shelter. sought the The City of evolved in At the same time, your support of this water system will also reflect economic responsibility, in that it allows the economy of scale to reduce the cost per unit for water to an affordable level. The economic impact of individual wells, as an example, we suspect, would increase the price on these units to the point that they would not be competitive with units of comparable size and quality of construction now being built in the City of Chanhassen, only a short distance away. Shorewood has historically sought first to create an umbrella of order for a city that grew up in an entirely laissez faire environment, as did so many communities surrounding Minneapolis and St. Paul. It sought to reflect the mood of the pendulum's swing in favor of very conservative and single-minded housing policies that were compatible with the economic realities of more affluent times. You are responsible and have shown the wisdom to bring Shorewood forward to address new economic realities, new business, and new shelter realities that suffer from events as far away as Argentina and the Middle East. You will steer your ship wisely through these turbulent seas by accomodating the changing needs of your citizens. Another step compatible with those wise decisions you have already made is the implementation of a water system that continues your strong sense of social and economic responsiblity. :d truly ~u> ~ __ ~_" /;~4~_. Eric P. Canton EPC/jw