The URL can be used to link to this page

040984 CC Reg AgP . Ii.. ..f,.t I ,;' .i .. ..'1 ' ,,~ \ ""'. ;". r,. .", .:. . .. ~.. '''.. . CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MINUTES MONDAY, APRIL 9, 1984 COUNCIL CHAMBERS 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD 7:30 PM M I NUT E S CALL TO ORDER The regular meeting of the Shorewood City Council was called to order by Mayor Rascop at 7:37 PM, April 9, 1984, in the Council Chambers of City Hall. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The meeting was opened with the Pledge of Allegiance and a prayer given by Mayor Rascop. ROLL CALL Present: Mayor Rascop, Council Members Haugen, Shaw, Stover and Gagne. Staff: Attorney Larson, Engineer Norton, Clerk Kennelly, and Planner Nielsen. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Gagne moved, seconded by Hauge~ to approve the Minutes of the regular Council meeting of March 26, 1984, as written. 3 ayes and 2 abstains. (Rascop and Shaw - due to absence at meeting). ANIMAL PATROL CONTRACT RESOLUTION NO. 18-84 Larry Smieja from White Bear Animal Control was present to explain their services and their charges. They have recently acquired the fa~ilities that formerly housed MAPSI. Haugen moved, seconded by Gagne, to contract with White Bear Animal Service effective May 15, 1984, at the rates presented by Mr. Smieja. Motion carried unanimously~ 5 ayes. 7:45 PUBLIC HEARING Covington Vine Ridge Rezoning Request The public hearing was called to order by Mayor Rascop at 7:55 PM. Eric Canton represented Covington/Vine/Ridge presenting a slide presentation reviewing the proposed development. Sue Paulson of 19420 Shady Hills Road questioned the proposed roads within the project. Mr. Canton said there may be mlnor changes in connection with other proposed projects. Public portion was closed at 8:28 PM with comments in writing accepted until April 23, 1984. jJ/ ... e - REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING APRIL 9, 1984 Page Two 7:45 PUBLIC HEARING Covington Vine Ridge Rezoning Request (Continued) Questions on the development's "restrictive covenant" covering type and placement of structures, garages, trail systems and building permit approvals were addressed. Haugen asked Planner Nielsen about the Comp Plan Amendment comments from Metro Council. Metro Council did approve the amendment but felt lower priced housing is necessary for the City. Gagne moved, seconded by Stover, to approve the Concept Stage and Development Stage approval of a P.U.D. Zoning. Motion withdrawn due to the Public Hearing remaining open until April 23, 1984, for written comments. Shaw moved, seconded by Rascop,to table until the April 23, 1984, Coucil meeting. Motion carried 4 ayes, 1 nay - Gagne. SIMPLE SUBDIVISION 24350 Smithtown Road ~#~'"~'1 0._ . _ . r ~ A request was made from Tom Hinkley of 24530 Smithtown Road to add a 15' x 72' piece of property to the north end of the lot. His present building encroaches onto the lot to the north. This division/combination would correct this problem. Shaw moved, seconded by Haugen, to approved the division as requested. Motion carried by roll call vote - 5 ayes. ~._~ RECONSIDERATION - RAPID OIL CHANGE ~ Peter Jarvis and Ed Flaherty presented a reque~~~~q~1the ~ ~ ~' Council t? r~onsider a variance previously r~(P~~ v~.' constructlva' Rapid Oil Change at 19465 State Highway #7. fhe vt ~ variance is for a setback from a residential district, 50'~ pv~ vf~~.' is needed. Mr. Flaherty will remove the existing storage ro~;I r.. area from the "Floral Building" making the setback 47' instea~r~ of 27'.1\ He 1.,.,:-; a1 HlJ ,,...,111:88. the parking Qpa~il to thel rear ?,,r'JV i and added more landscaping to buffer to the residential c:Y ,j,Y" district. Mr. Jarvis is requesting a setback variance and a C.U.P. ~rmit to allow the residential use as permitted by Ordinance 152 as previ~~y~P~~y~~he Planning Commission. He sited the "hardship'ifJueing ttl'e~co:nflguration of the lot created by an "accident of history", if all setbacks.were ~ be m~t,. less than 25% of the lot wo ld be usable. ~ 0-<-. ~ ~...b1:~~t?~P ~.- . Shaw moved, seconded by Haugen, to reconsider action for discussion only. Mr. Jarvis offered outside decorating changes to relect earth tones. He also presented a plan that would follow setbacks within the ordinance, placing the building up to the front line but not being esthetically feasible. ~ e e REGULAR COUNCIL MINUTES APRIL 9, 1984 Page Three RECONSIDERATION - RAPID OIL CHANGE (CONTINUED) Gagne moved, seconded by Haugen, to redraft a resolution of approval to include: the new exterior design; minimum setback of 23 feet from the rear lot line; the residential used by C.U.P. in compliance with Ordinance #152 and all other conditions listed in the original denial resolution. Roll call vote - 3 ayes, 2 nays - Shaw and Stover. Motion denied. Shaw moved, seconded by Stover to instruct the attorney to draft a Resolution of denial. Motion carried 3 ayes, 2 nays - Haugen and Gagne. COUNCIL BREAK - 9:50 - 9:55 SHENEHON-GOODLUND SUBDIVISION ~C~N~ ....., - Attorney William F. Kelly was present to represent Mr. & Mrs. Shenehon and Mr. & Mrs. Goodlund in a request to divide their parcel of land into 3 lots along lot lines described as: Shady Island Parcell - Lot 18 and part of Lot 17 (20,000 sq. ft.) and Parcel 2 - Lot 19 (13,380 sq. ft.) and Parcel 3 - Lot 20 (23,000 sq. ft.) Mr. Kelly felt that no variances were necessary to request new property ID numbers for the lots as they were originally platted, he also felt that the R-l zoning was not common and previous divisions have been granted for lots under 40,000 square feet. Mayor Rascop felt that this request needs a variance and a formal application requesting this division. At this time, no formal application for this division request has been made. No further CounCll action will be taken until a formal request has been made. John Uban representing Trivesco - which is comprised of Steiner Koppelman, Robert H. Mason, and Mark Z. Jones, builders, presented a Comp Plan Amendment/pre-application meeting for/the purpose of reviewing their proposed development. The property is located approximately at 20095 State Highway #7 and extend- ing south to Covington Road. This project would consist of 95 single family lots - 160 multiple-family and 9.08 acres of commercial property. Mr. Uban reviewed park plans, newinter:-- section proposal and phasing of the project. Les Anderson of 5385 Shady Hills Circle stated he felt that if the Condos were allowed, they would further devaluate the prop- erties in Shady Hills. Mr. Uban is planning a neighborhood meeting to answer any questions and concerns they may have about the project. ~ TRIVESCO - INFORMAL DISCUSSION e e REGULAR COUNCIL MINUTES APRIL 9, 1984 Page Four INFORMAL DISCUSSION - PROPOSED REZONING A request for procedural direction came from Marvin and Judy Janicke for the purpose of operating a motor home rental at 5580 County Road #19. This property is presently zoned as R-4 and this use is not permissable under that zoning. Council reviewed the zoning districts and questioned ways of controlling this use. Haugen moved, seconded by Gagne, to direct Planner Nielsen to proceed with Janicke's application to rezone the property to C-2 and include a C.U.P. Motion carried unanimously. PARK COMMISSION REPORT BMX Contract RESOLUTION NO. 19-84 Gary Carl recommended the BMX contract be approved under the control and operation of David Ronken of Northstar BMX. It will continue to operate as Shorewood BMX with a non-profit status, and an improvement of insurance coverage. Haugen moved, seconded by Shaw, to approve and sign the contract as recommended. Motion carried. 5 ayes. Festival of Parks Expenditure Park Commision requested $700.00 for expenses for the 1984 Festival of Parks. Rascop moved, seconded by Haugen to authorize the $700.00 expenditure. Motion carried. PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT Stover reported on the Commission review of Trivesco, Shorewood Oaks and the Hinkley division. ATTORNEY REPORT Attorney Larson submitted a written explanation of the Attorney General's opinion on the use of General Funds to subsidize the cities water system. Larson stated that the Attorney General was not objecting to this use of funds, but we may still be sued by the "Citizens Group". ENGINEERS REPORT Engineer Norton reported on the standing water problem on the properties located at 1010 and 1050 Holly Lane. The water was tested by Twin City Water testing. The water tested out as "swamp water",' no contamination of any sewage disposal. - e REGULAR COUNCIL MINUTES APRIL 9, 1984 Page Five INTERSECTION - TRIVESCO Attorney Larson prepared a draft agreement with Trivesco to arrange for the feasibility study and the cost of that study. Trivesco changed the agreement and returned it to the attorney. The Council reviewed and added further changes and instructed Planner Nielsen to proceed with the agreement with Trivesco. Council also instructed Engineer Norton to deal with MN DOT in reviewing this project. AMESBURY WEST - STREET LIGHT REQUEST A request was submitted in writing from James McNulty to have a street light installed at the entrance to Amesbury West. Rascop moved, seconded by Gagne, to approve the request. Motion carried. 4 ayes, 1 nay - Shaw. RESOLUTION NO. 20-84 WATER S~UDY ACCEPTANCE Haugen moved, seconded by Gagne, to officially accept the Water Study prepared py Engineer Jim Norton of Orr-Schelen- Mayeron. Motion carried unanimously - 5 ayes. ADMINISTRATORS REPORT Tax Forfeited Land RESOLUTION NO. 16-84 It was confirmed at the County level that all the residents using Lot 21, Auditors Subdivision #367, known as Island View Road, have easements granted in their deeds for the purpose of access to their properties. Staff c'ontacted area residents and found there was no interest in ownership of this property by owners of the affected lots. Gagne moved, seconded by Stover, to release property for state land sale. Motion carried. (Add to resolution #16-84). May Meeting Dates The Second Council meeting in May will be held on Tuesday, the 29th of May because of Memorial Day the 28th. e - REGULAR COUNCIL MINUTES APRIL 9, 1984 Page Six ADMINISTRATORS REPORT (Continued) Municipal Clerk's Week RESOLUTION NO. 21-84 Haugen moved, seconded by Rascop, to adopt Reagan Proclamation and proclaim the week of May 13, 1984 as "Municipal Clerk's Week". Motion carried unanimously. Saving Withdrawal Plan A request has been made to set up a savings withdrawal plan for the City employees that volunteer to join. Rascop moved, seconded by Shaw, to approve the request to be set up by the Finance Director. Motion carried unanimously. Low Income - Sewer Rate RESOLUTION NO. 22-84 A request to continue and establish a rate reduction in the quarterly sewer charges for low income residents making applications and qualifying under the Section 8 income limits has been received. Rascop moved, seconded by Haugen, to approve a 1/3 reduction in sewer rates for those who request and qualify for the lower rate. Motion carried unanimously. 1983 Workmens Compensation Dividend A check in the amount of $928.00 was received from the insurance carrier, League of Minnesota Cities, as a reimbursement of 1983 Workmens Compensation. MAYORS REPORT ,/ Disposal Advisory Committee Appointment Rascop moved, seconded by Gagne, to appoint Jan Haugen as representative to the Disposal Advisory Committee. Motion carried unanimously. COUNCIL REPORTS Review of Proposed New Bills Haugen reviewed the "Action Alert" bulletin on proposed new bills such as: "Comparable Worth" and "Legal Publication Bill". ~. . e e REGULAR COUNCIL MINUTES APRIL 9, 1984 Page Seven COUNCIL REPORTS (Continued) Crescent Beach Expenses Gagne informed the Council of the need to replace a stolen boat for the use of the life guards and the repairs necessary to the raft for Crescent Beach. Estimates for the replacement boat are from $425.00 - $625.00 for a 12' boat. Estimates for a raft is $2000.00 for all repairs or $500.00 for frame repair and an additional $400.00 for deck replaced by the City crew. Council instructed Gagne to obtain expenditure approval from Tonka Bay for 1/2 of the cost and then proceed with boat purchase and frame repair with in-house deck replacement. APPROVAL OF CLAIMS AND ADJOURNMENT Rascop moved, seconded by Haugen, to approve claims for payment to be followed by adjournment at 1:40 AM. Motion carried unanimously - 5 ayes. Respectfully Submitted, Sandra L. Kennelly SLK:js ~ GENERAL FUND ~ Check 28524 28525 28526 28527 28528 28529 29530 28531 28532 28533 28534 28535 28536 28537 28538 28539 29540 29541 28542 28543 28544 28545 28546 28547 28548 28549 28550 28551 28552 28553 28554 28555 28556 28557 28558 28559 28560 28561 28562 28563 28564 28565 28566 28567 28568 28569 28570 28571 28572 28573 28574 28575 28576 28577 28578 #. TO WHOM.PAID. State Treasurer City of Shorewood Void City of Mound Sub. Rate Authority Duane Scherbing Sandra Kennelly Postmaster Key Leaing City of Excelsior LMC Insurance Plan Municipals State Treasurer Barbara Fletcher Earl Andersen Assoc. Budget Paper Chanhassen Lawn Dale Office Machines Govt Training Service Hance Hardware Hopkins Parts Larson, Gary Leef Bros Inc MAPSI Mtka Comm. Services Midwest Asphalt Minnegasco Navarre Hardware Natl Chemsearch NSP Orr-Schelen-Mayeron Risk Control Shorewood Tree Servo Suburban Tire SLMPSD State of Mn. SPS Companies S&S Welding Sun Newspapers Water Products No. Central Water Evelyn Beck Roger Day Roberta Dybvik Dennis Johnson Sandra Kennelly Sue Niccum Brad Nielsen Void Bob Quaas Brad Nielsen Dan Randall Pat Ray Julie Story Don Zdrazil APRIL 9, 1984 . AMOUNT $' 785.64 37.59 -0- 880.77 245.40 203.62 11.00 234.00 223.30 9,433.50 991. 54 5.00 15.00 52.50 39.90 15.90 126.95 6.75 1,125.00 35.28 28.55 3,209.20 160.80 230.80 1,900.00 316.75 84.58 19.76 64.66 966.88 2,686.36 200.00 697.50 202.92 68.55 214.73 38.48 855.00 10.00 265.00 45.00 655.87 513.27 410.32 513.27 588.78 385.47 104.02 -0- 613.81 668.06 508.17 362.81 279.52 701.66 CHECKS PAID SINCE PURPOSE: PERA 3/28/84 Petty Cash 2nd t Fire Contract Assessment Planning Refund Refund Clerk Conference Postage April Lease 2nd t Fire Contract April Premium Annual Dues Pollution Control Clean City Hall Street Signs Supplies March Supplies Repair Adder Spring "Plan Session Small Tools Shop Supplies March Legal Fees Laundry-Uniform Service March Animal Control 1984 Share Road Materials March Utilties-Ames. Well Maintenance Shop Supplies Electricity Feb Engineer Fees March Services Haul Brush Truck #1 - Tires Feb Jail Book Fees Traffic Light Maint. Park Supplies Equip Repairs Subscrip. Sailor/Sun Well Maint. Register School Salary " " " " " " Adj. Retroactive " " " " " " Total ~33,039.l9 . . LIQUOR FUND Check #. 1969 1970 1971 1972 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 TO WHOM PAID Ryan Properties Harry Niemela State Treasurer Johnson Liquor Ed Phillips & Sons Quality Wine Van Paper Co. PQ&C Automation MBA L.M.C. Insurance Void NSP Minnegasco Johnson Liquor Twin City Wine Johnson Liquor Griggs Cooper Russell Marron Don Thara1son Stephen Thies Void Harry Feichtinger Susan Latterner Mary Skraba Chris Schmid Dean Young State Treasurer Mtka State Bank Comm, of Revenue State Treasurer Alarm Services Sue Culver C&S services Quality Wine Quality Spirits Day Distributing East Side Beverage A. J, Ogle Pepsi Cola Bottling Coca Cola Bottling G&K Services Comm of Revenue Johnons Liquor Co. Twin City Wine Griggs Cooper Ed Phillips Quality Spirits APRIL 9, 1984 AMOUNT $ 2,540.83 882.50 332.72 850.49 1,412.03 540.13 138.18 20.00 10.85 462.79 -0- 214.59 295.90 1,429.29 233.30 734.00 2,232.38 426.40 122.62 256.12 -0- 638.53 97.00 100.38 244.26 333.38 235.64 312.90 167.00 323.57 212.43 53.88 53.68 396.92 645.36 2,274.37 1,989.80 436.16 257.40 190.05 59.80 3,998.78 384.59 420.83 2,123.84 536.82 721.65 CHECKS PAID SINCE PURPOSE: April Rent April Rent PERA - 3/28/84 Wine Purchases " & Liquor Purch. Wine Purchases Register Supplies Ice Purchases Insurance - April April Premium Electricity II Fuel II Wine Purchases " " " " " Liquor Salary " " " " " " " " 4/11/84 4/11/84 4/11/84 4/11/84 FICA Taxes FWH " SWH PERA Store II Salary Ba11ist for Lights Wine Purchases Liquor Purchases March Beer Purchases " " " " " " " " " " Pop " Laundry Service March Sales Tax Wine Purchases " " Liquor Purchases Wine Purchases Liquor Purchases Total $30,344.14 . MEMORANDUM e e MAYOR Robert Rascop COUNCI L Jan Haugen Tad Shaw Kristi Stover Robert Gagne ADMINISTRATOR Doug Uhrhammer CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD . SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 . (612) 474-'3236 TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: BRAD NIELSEN DATE: 19 APRIL 1984 RE: SHOREWOOD NURSERY - CLARIFICATION OF COUNCIL'S DETERMINATION FILE ~O.: 405 (83.45) The Council minutes from 14 November 1983 are attached as Exhibit A of this memo. The minutes refer to revisions of the Planning Commission's recommendation (Exhibit B, attached), but do not specify what the revisions are. The staff needs a clarification of the decision in order to prepare the conditional use permit. If there are any questions, please contact my office prior to Monday night's meeting. CC: Sandy Kennelly Gary Larson Gary Minion ~ A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore ~ e R~JAR COUNCIL MEETING N~MBER 14, 1983 Page Two EMMER HEARING - continued Mr. Reutiman questioned the availability to the sanitary sewer. Public Hearing was closed at 7:55 PM. Gagne moved, seconded by Stover, to approve the subdivision with the variance, also f.ile Engineer approved driveway access, drainage plan and utility hook-up. Motion approved by Roll Call ~~ Vote - 5 ayes. MWCC MEETING ~..~",' ~~' ......0;.'::."/- Haugen attended the "Blue Ribbon Committee" meeting of the MWCC. 77'-~ohn Steinberg invited the Shorewood Council to attend a special meeting with the Sewer Board to deal just with Shorewood problems. Council accepted gratefully and will prepare reports for the meeting. 8:00 PM PUBLIC HEARING Champion Auto Sign Request Ken Griffith was present to request a sign permit variance to install a 14.5' x 15" sign in addition to the existing 4' x 8' sign. RESOLUTION NO. 79-83 Public portion was opened at 8:00 PM. Mr. Reutiman indicated that a similar request was granted at the Minnetonka Bank. Public Hearing was closed at 8:05 PM. Haugen moved, seconded by Stover to approve this sign variance with the condition that no additional signage be requested. Motion approved by Roll Call Vote - 5 ayes. SHOREWOOD NURSERY EXPANSION Gary Minion reviewed for the Council his plans for expansion. He has purchased the house adjoining his property and 2 additional adjoining outlots. He would like to move existing garage to the rear of the lot and install an exit onto Wood Duck Circle that would be chained during off hours. Small house would be used for office and/or employee/owner living quarters. \*/R one from R-5to R-C RESOLUTION NO. 80-83 Haugan moved, seconded by Stover to rezone, according to the Planning Commission recommendations, the property as described in the Resolution from R-5 to R-C. Motion carried by Roll Call Vote - 5 ayes. Zoning Amendment RESOLUTION NO. 81-83 Stover moved, seconded by Haugen, to include "Caretaker Quarters" 0,as a conditional permitted use in the R-C zone~ Caretakers . Y. f //'Quartersto be defined in the Ordinance Amendment as "someone who ~'~~~Q)/ performs a function or has a responsibility in the nursery business. 6 ,j/ Motion carried unanimously by Roll Call Vote - 5 ayes. ~,,\ belt ~- \ e REG \R COUNCIL MEETING NOV~ER 14, 1983 Pag~hree RESOLUTION NO. 82-83 Conditional Use Permit , . Haugen moved, seconded by Gagne, to grant a C.U.P. for the expansion of Shorewood Nursery in accordance with the revised 4 ~ recommended by the Planning Commission and revised oy-the Council. Motion carried unanimously by Roll Call Vote - 5 ayes. 8:15 PM PUBLIC HEARING RESOLUTION NO. 83-83 Rear Yard Setback - 2tll15 Boulder Bridge Drive Request was made by Bud Wheeler for a 30 foot rear yard setback for. the purpose ofa pool house at the same setback as the existing pool. Public Hearing was opened at 8:55 PM and closed to the public at 9:00 PM with no comment. Gagne moved, seconded by Stover to grant the rear yard variance. Motion carried unanimously by Roll Call Vote - 5 ayes. 8:30 PM PUBLIC HEARING 52~5 Shady Island Road Public Hearing was opened at 9:02 PM with Mr. Shenehon and Mrs. Goodlund's request to divide the property described as 50 feet of Lot 17 and Lots 18, 19, and 20, into 3 Lots containing an average of 18,783 sq. feet. Comments were taken from Mr. Reutiman in reference to sewer assessments charged on property. Harold Berg opposed the 3 Lots on the existing 15 foot road. Jack Hanson questioned the Planning Commission's recommendation approving the 3 Lots split, he was in complete agreement with the proposal. Written comments were received from Mr. Grosz in favor of a 2 lot division. Richard Spellman opposing the 3 Lot division and approved of 2 Lots if a 50 foot road can be obtained. Public portion was closed at 9;20 PM. Council felt there was no real hardship soon to warrant this request and the 15 foot road posed as access problem. Haugen motioned, seconded by Gagne, to instruct the attorney to draft a Resolution of denial of this request for 3 Lots division. Motion carried unanimously. CONTINUATION OF PARK COMMISSION REPORT Roger Stein reviewed the past Park Commission meeting. He requested a vaccum cleaner and First Aid kits be purchased for the Park Buildings. They would like Don Zdrazil to attend a couple of meetings a year for needed informational input. Administrator Uhrhammer reviewed the Manor Park expenses and reviewed the current budget. Stein questioned the Heidi Johnson accident of 5 years ago, and if anyone had any information on this. The Council did not have any information available to them now. Stein recommended Council to approve the pre-existing trail agreement. A-r ~ CITY OF SHOREWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION MEING TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 1, 1 e COUNCIL CHAMBERS 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD 7:30 P.M. M I NUT E S CALL TO ORDER Chairman Benson called the November 1, 1983 Planning Commission Meeting to order at 7:30 PM. ROLL CALL Present: Commissioners Janet Leslie, Frank Reese, Richard Spellman, Bob Shaw, Mary Boyd, Bruce Benson, VernWatten; Planner Brad Nielsen; Council Liaison Tad Shaw; Secretary Sue Niccum. Absent: None APPROVAL OF MINUTES Reese moved, seconded by Watten, to approve the Minutes of October 18, 1983 as written. Motion carried unanimously. 7:30 PUBLIC HEARING - LAKE VIRGINIA LIFT STATION - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT The hearing began at 7:42 with Mr. Stenborg of Metropolitan Waste Control g~v1ng a presentation. He informed the Commission that they want to install an odor control system consisting of a blower with a carbon unit that will filter out chemicals that cause odors. It will be built between the building and the lake to conceal the unit. It will be enclosed to protect it from vandalism and heat/cold, and to deaden the sound of the blower. They have a similar station in Wayzata by the beach and have not received any complaints on that unit. Commissioner Leslie asked what construction material will be and was told it will be reinforced fiberglass treated on inside and painted on the outside to protect it from sunlight. Public portion closed at 7:43 with no comment. Watten moved, seconded by Reese, to recommend to the Council to provide a Condi- tional Use Permit for installation of this facility. Motion carried unanimously. ~E~OOD NURSERY - GARY M1~ON - THREE PUBL~ HEARINGS, 7:45 PUBLIC HEARING - REZONING REQUEST FROM R-5, MULTIPLE FAMILY TO R--C, RESIDENtIAL COMMERCIAL 8:00 PUBLIC HEARING - ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT TO INCLUDE SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS IN THE R-C DISTRICT 8:15 PUBLIC HEARING - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - EXPANSION OF SHOREWOOD NURSERY All three Public Hearings were opened and kept open until the end, due to the fact that the discussion on all three issues would affect the final decision on each Hearing. ~h~b it '8.. r . " e ~LANNING COMMISSION MINUTES evember 1. 1983 ge Two Mr. Gary Minion was present to state that he had bought Out lots A and B. plus the piece of property west of the nursery with the red house standing on it. He stated that he would like to: 1. Move the existing garage back, eliminating an eyesore. 2. Build a lath house to help shade nursery stock, consisting ofa structure approximately 10 feet high, no sides, rough cedar horizontally on top, he up by 4" x 4" posts. This would be built in the area currently occupied by'the garage. He mentioned that a similar structure presently exists onhisproperty and is available for inspection. 3. Take the existing driveway entering on SmithtownRoad, and havei~exitatthe rear of the property onto Wood Duck Circle because the current driveway is only wide enough for one car and most of the nursery stock is in the back of the property, making the exiting easier at the rear. 4. Live upstairs in the red house and use the downstairs as an office and the kitchen for employees, or let one employee live there as one of the working benefits. (He stated that the house is presently under lease until September of 1984.) He also mentioned that he has already done landscaping on the Outlots, and plans to do more, both on the Out lots and the piece of property upon which the house is located, for a buffer and to improve the appearance. Planning Commission Discussion Building Setbacks were questioned. Planner Nielsen stated that with the additional property Mr. Minion has bought, he meets setback requirements. Driveway. Several members of the Commission expressed concern with a commercial driveway exiting onto a residential street. They discussed: - making it a one way, entering off Smithtown Road and exiting onto Wood Duck Circle. - Conditional Use Permit for a year, to be studied after that time. - a cul-de-sac at the end, entering and exiting onto Smithtown Road. It was explained to Mr. Minion that, although the Commission did not see a problem with his particular request, they are setting a precedent for similar situations, and as a result did not feel it was appropriate. They suggested that he. redesign the driveway so as not to exit on Wood Duck Circle. House. Commission felt that although they did not mind Minion, or one of his employees living in the house as an accessory use, they would rather not add Single Family Dwellings to the R-C District. Planner Nielsen stated that the single family residence is not listed in any fashion as either'permitted accessory or conditional use in the R-C District, therefore the ordinance would. have to be amended even if limited as an accessory use. Mr. Minion questioned the fact that if it is legal to make it a duplex, why not a single? e-~ . . e 'LANNING COMMISSION MINUTES ~~ovember 1, 1983 "Page Three J MOTIONS. -Watten moved, seconded by Leslie, to approve the rezoning from R-5, Multiple Family, to R-C, Residential-Commercial. Roll Call Vote - Motion passed unanimously. -Watten moved, seconded by Spellman, to deny the request to amend the Zoning Ordinance to include single family dwellings as a permitted use in the R-C District. Roll Call Vote -Motion failed 2-5 (Watten and Spellman nay.) -Watten moved, seconded by Spellman, that the Zoning Ordinance be amended to include caretaker residences as a Conditional Use in the R-C District subject to the following conditions: 1. Residences will be allowed only when accessory to the principal use of the property. 2. That the residence be occupied only by a caretaker for the premises and not rented out to someone who is not affiliated with the principal use of the property. Roll Call Vote - Motion passed unanimously. -Reese moved. seconded by Spellman, to approve the expansion of the Shorewood Nursery Conditional Use Permit subject to the following: 1. The service driveway from Smithtown Road to the rear of the property should not exit onto Wood Duck Circle. The five recommendations in the Planner's Report dated 31 October 1983. should be complied with. Call Vote - Motion passed unanimously. WHEELER AND ASSOCIATES - REQUEST FOR SETBACK VARIANCE - 28115 BOULDER BRIDGE DRIVE Mr. Wheeler was present to request a 30 foot rear yard setback to place an accessory pool house on his property. Reese moved. seconded by Benson, to allow a 30 foot rear yard setback. Motion carried unanimously. JAMES EMMER -REQUEST FOR SUBDIVISION AND VARIANCE - 5570 COVINGTON ROAD. Mr. Emmer presented a request for a simple subdivision and a lot area variance that had been approved in 1982, because it was not filed with the County within 30 days it was considered void, so Mr. Emmer resubmitted his request. Benson moved, seconded by Shaw, to recommend approval of the subdivision and variance. Motion carried unanimously. HOWARD SHENEHON/MARY GOODLUND - REQUEST FOR SUBDIVISION AND VARIANCE - 5285 SHADY ISLAND ROAD Ms. Goodlund and Mr. Shenehon were present. Mr. Shenehon presented a copy of a plat map drawing showing that many of the lots on the island are small. ~.~ '" e e MAYOR Robert Rascop COUNCI L Jan Haugen Tad Shaw Kristi Stover Robert Gagne ADMINISTRATOR Doug Uhrhammer CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD . SHOREWOOD. MINNESOTA 55331 · (612) 474-3236 MEMORANDUM TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: BRAD NIELSEN ~'V DATE: APRIL 19, 1984 RE: HAGSTROM SWIMMING POOL REQUEST FILE NO.: 405 (GENERAL) Custom Pools, Inc., has applied for a building permit for a swimming pool on behalf of Bob Hagstrom. The property is located at 5715 Kathleen Court (See Exhibit A, attached). Exhibit B shows the proposed location of the pool at the rear of the lot. Setbacks conform to the zoning requirements for the R-1 District. The pool area will be enclosed by a 4 foot cedar fence. If there are any questions relative to this request, please contact my office prior to Monday night's meeting. cc: Sandy Kennelly A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore ,,5 -TO e 6~' . ~--- -. - ""--ClH~ 1'111 rO't:F " ", 1 /: ! ....,..., """ ", '. ~~..-~--'_-::-:-~ .~ / / S(fFFfl ~ ~ ",'~ 1'1' ,. ":". ./' ';>,,' .. '" 0: .'')/ . / t Nor+~ . ' / /- -~..PI1ll"'" / " // , '..... .. / nt->rt. , 11 H,t lN~> ":fPRf1'''Jll'''~ E~:hi bi t B D~9J:~~;2--'~!X~ pU~li .. r 0\r' v GI (q) . ~~ , 1 (10") ~ / ( 0\ 17~ ~ It ~ ~. I 2 ~ 1ST RED ~ ~ ".. /' .{;o : j -~ ! -'~71 E.((, ) I 3 (&1 .JS() .IN , ' (1 1 · ... .; 1~S. 15T7. ~., LJ' N 0 ;::1 . , .J. II ~ F G (1) (8) .122 1518.850 P""d '153\.~ .ChCli':"" SURVE.Y 48 "~ H(?) " 11,5'-/ .~. .. }J=": ~ ',- 1';)'\ ~_vl.) A.a- \. ,.. ;! ',. . . " ~(b)(.. ~ \ f}t>~t't 1 I ~cc(hc~ C I <i) I V\. G~~t,ot'\ rfva 5080. . ..:.c . i' Lor 4 ,.7..r J.F . +">J~'p 'R L~. ,. I ~ . Ol"c:.ry; ~ .~. r-.. '- 5 ~ 't- oyj Cf\ ~ l' Nl>Y't \\ \J; '^ , ClQ 297. 06 95 ;coo$: 74 - .. I:xhi bi t A SI'I~_~Q..~Ar~~~~ , HaGstrom S\Jlrmnng jJool request @ , CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MONDAY, APRIL 9, 1984 COUNCIL CHANBERS 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD 7:30 PM AGENDA CALL TO ORDER A. Pledge of Allegiance and Prayer ~ B. Roll Call: Haugen V/' Shaw ~ Stover .. Gagne . / Mayor Rascop J ,1:71 '1' 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. Regular Council Meeting - March 26, 1984. [Attachment #1] 2. Matters from the Floor A. (1 : <-/5' 3 . Public Hearing - Rezoning Request Applicant: Covington Vine Ridge Location: Vine Hill Road and Covington Road [Attachment #3a - Legal] [Attachment #3b - Staff Recommendation] [Attachment #3c - Park Commission Minutes] 4. Animal Patrol Presentation Larry Smieja - White Bear Animal Control [Attachment #4a - White Bear Rates] [Attachment #4b - MAPSI Rates] 5. Simple Subdivision Applicant: Thomas Hinkly Location: 24530 Smithtown Road [Attachment #5a] ... AGENDA REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING APRIL 9, 1984 Page Two 6. Reconsideration - Rapid Oil Change Applicants: Ed Flaherty Peter Jarvis 19465 State Highway 7 Location (*Referto Council packets 2/13- 2/27 - 3/12-3/26) 7. Reconsideration - Shenehon-Goodlund Subdivision Presentation: Don F. Kelly Location Shady Island - Lots 17, 18, 19, and 20 [Attachment #7a] 8. Informal Discussion - Comp Plan Amendment Preapplicant Applicant: Trivesco Location: State Highway 7/Covington Road [Attachment #8a] , qtS ?;:; V 4l 9. Informal Discussion - Proposed Rezoning - Jumar Motor Home Rental Applicants: Judy and Marvin Janicke Location 5580 County Road 19 [Attachment #9a] 10. Planning Commission Report A. 11. Park Commission Reports A. BMX contract B. Festival of Parks expenses request [Attachment #lla & lIb] 12. Attorneys Report A. Report on Attorney General ~pinion B. 13. Engineers Report A. Holly Lane sewer problem B. Status of feasibility study - Trivesco intersection C. ., . \' AGENDA REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING APRIL 9, 1984 Page Three 14. Administrative Report A. Tax Forfeited Land - Lot 21, Auditors Subdivision No. 367 B. Spring Clean-up - May 5 and 6 C. May Meeting Dates D. Resolution "Municipal Clerk Week" 15. Mayors Report A. Safety committee Membership B. Discussion of Joint Manager Proposal g: ~:~:e~ U)~ ~ Council Report 16. A. Policy of "Denial" Changing B. 17. Approval of Claims and Adjournment ( A. /J. d~ (}s~, ~Q/ ~G! ..L-~~6 -# 3~ 7 /3. ~~)-(-) -:1 CL-^~I {~- 6A~~-D (I. ~(~~ ~~ oe:t . . - .' ~' c::2 I' , ~Zla^ 7/ ! (fL... L '(1 r,O. l>(i~_(~_~~ ~ ~. ~ tU~ l.\ (~ tfj tk . /) __ . if), /' t,e/U~^((',.&)t/ ,~L~ CJ:.i(tL")>,,J /Zt.L~ ,!<~~~~,:'~~A<f 0<-,-_ <J E, SO-<-~. . . ...,." ..j A I} /?.# \ L_,L(j../z..C 1,- o:JL:P...~a.....>e ~ F .~~7 ~~^~... ULJz~J./ . '\ dd-V " CITY~OF SHOREWOODt" :"r;.'I". l,f;~ 'r H ",~,,,,,,~,,),,,,,,,,'r;IL CHAMBERS REGULAR COUNCIL MEiE, &:t,.......~" ..6:, ....,...."......' ~:,. .......i ... COUNTRY CLUB ROAD MONDAY, MARCH 26, t9 7:3 P.M. . M I NUT E S CALL TO ORDER The Regular Meeting of the Shorewood City Council was called to order by Acting Mayor Haugen at 7:30 P.M., March 26, 1984, in the Council Chambers of City Hall. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The meeting was opened with the Pledge of Allegiance and a prayer given by Acting Mayor Haugen. ROLL CALL Present: Acting Mayor Haugen; Councilmembers Stover and Gagne. Staff: Attorney Larson, Engineer Norton and Clerk Kennelly. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Gagne moved, seconded by Haugen, to approve the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of March 12, 1984 as written. Motion carried - 3 ayes. Stover moved, seconded by Gagne, to approve the Minutes of the Special Meeting held February 15, 1984 as written. Motion carried-3 ayes. LAND DONATION. A letter was received from Richfield Bank and Trust Company, the owners of Lot 6, Block 1, Minnetonka Manor, requesting the City to consider accepting this property as a donation from them. The Council discussed this matter and questioned the attorney about any problems that may be derived from this acceptance. Attorney Larson did not foresee any problems, only advantages. Gagne moved, seconded by Stover to gratefully accept this donation on behalf of the City. Motion carried - 3 ayes. TAX FORFEITED LAND Auditors Subdivision No. 367 - Lot 21 Lot 21 is the area used as Island View Road, a private road. Council discussed the sale to adjacent land owners or the need to acquire the land for the City because of the sanitary sewer line. Gagne moved, seconded by Stover to table until further information can be obtained. Motion carried - 3 ayes. Registered Land Survey No. 1064 - Tract A - Tonka View Addition - Outlot 1 RESOLUTION NO. 16-84 Gagne moved, seconded by Stover to release back to the State for land sale. Motion carried - 3 ayes. .. e RE~AR COUNCIL MINUTES MONDAY, MARCH 26, 1984 Page Two 7:45 PM PUBLIC HEARING CDBG Year VIII Reallocation of Funds RESOLUTION NO. 17-84 Mayor Haugen opened the Public Hearing at 7:50 P.M. for the purpose of reallocating $8,000.00 from Street Improvements/Special Assessment Grants. Public portion was closed with no comment at 7:58 PM. Stover moved, seconded by Gagne to reallocate the funds to Disease Tree Removal/Public Property. Motion carried - 3 ayes. 8:00 PM PUBLIC HEARING CDBG Year X Funds The Public Hearing was opened to the public at 8:00 PM for the purpose of suggesting possible uses for the Year X allocation of $23,302.00. Joanne Kvern was present to make a request for the South Shore Community Center for senior citizens. They would like funds from the grant to have kitchen facilities to supply meals for seniors. Staff also recommended additional housing rehab monies and addition to the codification project. Gagne moved, seconded by Stover to recommend funds be allocated to: Housing Rehab Senior Citizen Center Codification $ 8,302.00 5,000.00 10,000.00 $23,302.00 Motion carried - 3 ayes. PARK COMMISSION Gary Carl was present to review the discussion at the Park Commission meeting. They reviewed the park plan for Trivesco, and would prefer the addition of some of the Dayton property and relocate the proposed park location. Haugen questioned the type of park for that area, recommending a "passive" park. Bids will be let for playground equipment to be paid from the "Century Club" donation. ENGINEER'S REPORT Intersection Feasibility Study Engineer Norton reviewed the discussion with Mr. Steiner in reference to the costs and who would be responsible for the Feasibility Study, estimates of cost $25,000.00. Gagne moved, seconded by Stover to instruct the attorney and engineer to negotiate with Mr. Steiner the terms of covering the cost of the study. . e REaAR COUNCIL MINUTES MO Y, MARCH 26, 1984 Page Three .> Engineer's Report, continued Amesbury Pump The pump installation has been completed to the satisfaction of the engineer. He recommended payment of the bill. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT Spring Clean-Up Council recommended "Spring Clean-Up" dates to be set for May 5 & 6 or alternate days of May 19 & 20. The services will be handled in the same manner as last year. Staff will contact Village Sanitation to confirm availability of dates. Workshop - April 7, 1984 Council and Commission Workshop will be held at 8;30 A.M. at City Hall on April 7th. Haugen directed staff to obtain an alternate site that will hold more people if necessary. MAYOR'S REPORT Interview Material Haugen asked the Council to review the material on interviewing and hiring prior to the interviewing for the administrator position. These interviews will be held the week of April 2, 1984. Heiland's Letter A letter was received from James Heiland concerning a proposed rezoning of his commercial property to residential according to the Comprehensive Plan. Please review for comment at the next meeting. Legislative Updates Haugen reviewed some of the possible changes in bills to come before the legislature. COUNCIL REPORT Gagne reported on the Road Department's progress. They have removed 127 diseased trees on public property so far. He also discussed the color the new trucks should be painted. Council felt the recommended "safest colors" should be used. APPROVAL OF CLAIMS AND ADJOURNMENT Gagne moved, seconded by Stover followed by adjournment at 9;30 General Fund (Acct # 00166) Liquor Fund (Acct # 00174) Respectfully submitted, to approve claims for payment to be P.M. Motion carried - 3 ayes. Sandra L. Kennelly City Clerk SLK:pr Mayor . . GENERAL FUND - BILLS PAID SINCE MARCH 19, 1984 Check # 28486 28487 28488 28489 28490 28491 28492 28493 28494 28495 28496 28497 28498 28499 28500 28501 28502 28503 28504 28505 28506 28507 28508 28509 28510 28511 28512 28513 28514 28515 28516 28517 28518 28519 28520, 28521 28522 28523 TO WHOM PAID City of Excelsior Areawide Locksmiths AT&T Budget Paper Bergerson-Caswell Inc. Void Central Life Insurance Colonial Insurance Dept of Transportation Hennepin County Larson, Gary P.A. Metro Waste Control Minnegasco Metro Waste Control NSP NW Bell SLMPSD Village Sanitation Village of Tonka Bay Ziegler Tire Service Barbara Fletcher Local #224 Evelyn Beck Roger Day Roberta Dybvik Dennis Johnson Sandra Kennelly Sue Niccum Brad Nielsen Bob Quaas Dan Randall Patricia Day Don Zdrazil State Treasurer Voided Mtka State Bank Julie Story Comm of Revenue __.n__...._--..__....""_...,..~,> ........ _., ..........._. . .. A ""-"'''''(. ~..~ 1..._ 41:}l :.1, ::'.t lfj Sl ~ "!:.~."~ ., il; ..creW-Eaa t'ilir.ge l,oancl , AMOU:'JT ,7 --_.. I ,'.-.---- --.-- PURPOSE: Water Connection $ Office Keys Tel. Equip. Coffee Ames bury Pump April Premium " " Traffic Signal Maint. B&R Feb - Prisoners Legal Fees April Sewer Charges Fuel Sac Charges Electricity Telephone Service Police Protection Service Lift Station #2 Equip. Repairs Cleaning City Hall Union Dues Salary " " " " " " " " " " FICA WH. FWH Taxes Salary SWH Taxes Total AMOUNT 450.00 6.60 158.78 38.00 2,926.00 -0- 1,301.37 46.50 139.92 781.50 2,684.20 20,282.16 811.86 841.50 718.77 372.26 20,884.13 49.00 70.94 26.00 17.50 47.80 596.46 525.22 403.07 535.22 582.78 375.22 626.05 571.22 526.74 324.68 701.66 1,122.71 -0- 3,386.10 317.63 567.00 $63,816.55 Check # 1947 1948 1949 1950 1951 1952 1953 1954 1955 1956 1957 1958 1959 1960 1961 1962 1963 1964 1965 1966 1967 1968 LIQUOAltuND - BILLS PAID SINCE MA~ 19, 1984 TO WHOM PAID Voided Central Life Insurance Village Sanitation Russell Marron Don Thara1son Stephen Thies Susan Culver Harry Feichtinger Susan Latterner Mary Skraba Dean Young Christopher Schmid State Treasurer Minnetonka State Bank NSP NW BELL Griggs Cooper Company Johnson Bros Liquor Co. Minter-Weisman Co. Quality Wine & Spirits Johnson Bros Liquor. Commissoner of Revenue .'. .-----....,-..-.-"..,-..... --....,.,.,# _......,..>"-...,....,._'..'-.~._.. -,.' .-. An....'.....} t._ J.,J .~ ,~. ~-' \, :~,~:. i; ~1 Sh .:~....: f, ., O.,..e.'\ri1!....~ ;~ r J i -, ~;'!~ , i.'~~"~ ,~!. ,."y ',.",~'~.'. \ A....:.......;..; ~.;<.lt..'..a.~......',.A AMOUN. "_ _____________._____ i 1--. h________ ------_. _ _ ._____. _____ __ __. 1 !-.-.- --_.--___ __ _h ____________ _ r -- --..--------.-.- -..-- ---- -- ------ j ;-- .~--------- -----_._- ~ -----.~-_.--.. '__'___'_ _',__ .____u____.__..:....~_.__ ~ .' '.)I.TC_.___ ____ .. --. -. .. ~- .. .." ',' '.......- "'. ". PURPOSE: April Premium Services Salary " " " " " " " " FICA WH FWH Taxes E1ectricty Telephone Liquor Purchases Wine Purchases Cigarette Purchases Liquor Purchases Wine Purchases SWH Taxes Total AMOUNT $. -0- 70.59 59.00 426.40 123.13 256.12 73.95 649.38 146.60 142.38 333.38 244.26 235.64 316.10 225.23 161.72 2 ,442 . 19 464.44 576.68 747.36 336.86 178.00 $8,209.41 . . LEGAL NOTICE PUBLIC HEARING CITY OF SHOREWOOD NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Shorewood will hold a Public Hearing in the Council Chambers of the Shorewood City Hall, 5755 Country Club Road, Shorewood, Minnesota, on Monday, 9 April, 1~ at 7:45 PM, or as soon thereafter as possible. The purpose of the Hearing is to consider a request by Eric Canton to rezone property located in the northwest quadrant of Covington Road and Vine Hill Road from R-1, Single Family Residential to P.U.D., Planned Unit Development. Said property is described as: Commencing at a point in east line of southeast quarter of northeast quarter distance 243.39 feet north from southeast corner thereof thence west at right angles from said east line to a point of intersection with west line of east 350.34 feet thereof and point of beginning thence continuing west along last described line to its intersection with west line of east 570.34 feet thereof thence south parallel with said east line to center line of town road thence northwesterly along said center line to its intersection with west line of southeast quarter of northeast quarter thence north to northwest corner thereof thence east to northeast corner thereof thence south to a point in east line thereof distance 384 feet north from southeast quarter thereof thence west at right angles from said east line 103 feet thence south parallel with east line distance 50 feet thence east at right angles to said east line thence south to center line of said town road thence northwesterly along said center line to its intersection with southerly extension of said 'west line of east 350.34 feet of southeast quarter of northeast quarter thence north to beginning except roads. Unplatted in Section 36, Township 117, Range 23. . PID# 36-117-23-14-0004 Oral and written comments will be considered at that time. City of Shorewood SANDRA KENNELLY City Clerk To be published 28 March 1984 Sf4, . . MAYOR Robert Rascop COUNCI L Jan Haugen Tad Shaw K risti Stover Robert Gagne ADMINISTRATOR Doug Uhrhammer CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD . SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 . (612) 474-3236 MEMORANDUM TO: PLANNING COMMISSION, MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: BRAD NIELSEN DATE: 1 MARCH 1984 RE: COVINGTON VINE RIDGE FILE NO: 405 (83.46) BACKGROUND Having successfully gotten the City to approve ~ Comprehensive Plan amend- ment allowing up to 2.7 units per acre for his property located northwest of the Covington Road/Vine Hill Road Intersection, Mr. Eric Canton has now submitted plans for the next step of the approval process--rezoning fromR-1 to P.U.D. Since the Comp Plan amendment process is patterned so closely to the Concept Stage of the P.U.D. process, we have suggested that both Concept Stage and Development Stage be processed simultaneously. This procedure is allowed by Section 27A. Subd. 6.B.3. (Ordinance No. 122). For the complete background on this request, you should refer to the previous staff report dated 5 January 1984. Also, the applicant has submitted a P.U.D. booklet (cover letter dated 23 January, 1984) and revised plans based upon the recommendations of City staff and officials. The booklet is enclosed for your review. Copies of various plans for preliminary plat, staging, etc. are attached as exhibits of this report. ISSUES AND ANALYSIS As you know, the P.U.D. process consists of three stages of review. The applicant has submitted plans for the first two stages. Concept and Develop- ment Stage, together. As mentioned earlier the Ordinance does provide such an option. As a practical matter the Concept Stage approval for this project has already been completed via the Comp Plan amendment procedure. This report therefore will concentrate on the Development Stage of the process. Concept Stage At the time the Comprehensive Plan amendment was reviewed, certain recommenda- tions were made relative to lot size~, setbacks, street layout and park requirements. The applicant's plans have addressed these items quite well. All of the items will be discussed in detail as part of the following Development Stage analysis. A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore 3h . ~ FROM PLANNER ~iNGTON VINE RIDGE 1 MARCH 1984 page two Development Stage Since the project limits itself exclusively to single family residential use, review of the development stage basically involves review of the preliminary plat (Exhibit A, attached). 1. Streets. a. General Layout. Asyou recall, the original street layout for the westerly portion of the site consisted of a single entry from Covingtpn Road terminating in two cul-de-sacs. At the recommendation of the City staff and Planning Commission, the applicant has changed the design to a u-shaped configuration with two access points on Covington Road. Although not shown on the attached exhibits, the applicant has named the streets as follows: Westerly loop - Vine Ridge Curve Northerly cul-de-sac - Vine Ridge Court Southerly cul-de-sac - Covington Court The southerly cul-de-sac aligns directly with Covington Road where it continues eastward into Minnetonka. Vine Ridge Court is offset from Hanus Road in Minnetonka. The offset meets the 125 foot requirement provided in the Subdivision Ordinance. b. Street Design. The applicant's original plan included 40 foot wide streets. The new plan contains 50 foot r.o.w. widths. Since the Subdivision Ordinance requires a 30 foot surface where adjacent lots are less than half an acre in size, this leaves only 10 feet of r.o.w. on each side of the street. The City Engineer has in the past recommended a minimum of 13-15 feet on each side to accommodate utilities and room for snow plowing and storage in the winter. Rather than increase the r.o.w. width, the applicant has agreed to provide 10 foot easements across the fronts of all lots. While the existing Subdivision Ordinance does not provide for such easements, the proposed new Subdivision Ordinance will. The City Engineer should comment as to the trade-off between right-of-way amd easement. Such details as curve requirements, section design, grade~ etc., should be subject to review and comment by the City Engineer. c. Future Street Plans. As noted at the last Planning Commission meeting, the staff is preparing a Comprehensive Plan amendment which proposes a new intersection be created on Highway 7 to alleviate the problems at Vine Hill Road and Highway 7 (see Exhibit C, attached). A new collector street would replace Vine Hill Road as the collector street for that area. Vine Hill Road would . MEM~OM THE PLANNER COVINGTON VINE RIDGE 1 MARCH 1984 page three be bent westward to form a 90 degree intersection with the new collector street. The proposed plan has a minor impact on the Covington Vine Ridge project in two ways. First, the new collector would require additional r.o.w. from the south side of the project (35 feet has been provided from the centerline while 40 would be required). Also, bending Vine Hill Road westward may Fequireaslight adjustment to the lot in the southeasternmost corner of the site. The necessary changes can be done in the final plat for the project. 2. Lots and Blocks. As proposed, the preliminary plat consecutively numbers all lots in the project. The plat should be changed to show individual blocks with consecutive lots within each block. a. Lots sizes. The plat reflects changes from the original plans which were recommended by the staff and Planning Commission. Specifically all lots are 10,000 square feet in area or greater. Lot widths at building 1 ines are no. less than 65'. feet. b. Setbacks. The applicant's plans propose the following setbacks: front - 35 feet, side - 10 feet, and rear - 35 feet. Setbacks in a P.U.D. are somewhat negotiable between the developer and the City. However, certain parameters must be observed. As noted in the original staff report dated5 January, 1984, front yard set- backs should be adequate to accommodate two cars parked end to end in front of the garage without encroaching into the street. The proposed 35 foot front yards mitigate this concern. Also mentioned was the proximity of buildings within the project, given the relative narrowness of a 65 foot lot. To minimize the concern the applicant has provided 10 foot side yards. While it is not appropriate to say that variances should never be granted to the side yard requirement, the developer, as well as future owners within the project should clearly understand that the 10 foot minimum is intended to be maintained. Consequently, all building plans should take possible future expansion into consideration in locating structures on lots. 3. Grading, Drainage and Utilities. While these items are largely subject technical review by the City Engineer, one item is worth noting. The Subdivision Ordinance requires 20 foot easements for utilities along side and rear lot lines (10 feet on each side of the lot line). The applicant has shown 10 foot easements - five feet on each side. The City Engineer should comment as to the acceptability of smaller easements relative to the smaller lots. The major issue relative to utilities for this project is water service. While the Planning Commission can make its recommendation without a determination as to how the project may be served with water, the Council must reach a policy decision prior to the final plan stage of the review process. . ~ FROM PLANNER ~NGTON VINE RIDGE 1 MARCH 1984 Page four As a final note, the preliminary plat will be subject to review and comment by the Riley-Purgatory Creek Watershed District. 4. Architectural Considerations. While a P.U.D. involving only single family development does not typically require specifics as to architectural design, the applicant's past presentations have suggested that certain assurances as to quality control will be provided. Most of these are to be provided through protective covenants within the project. In reviewing the applicant's proposed covenants in his project booklet, the following concerns are noted. a. Will the proposed Architectural Design Review committee have criteria for evaluating proposed structures within the project? If so, what are the criteria? b. Should a copy of the committee's review be requried for a building permit from the City? c. Are garages to be required for all lots? The applicant's previous presentations suggested all homes would be built with garages, but I could find no specific reference to su~h a requirement. The applicant should clarify this question. 5. Parks. The applicant's plans are generally consistent with the recommendation of the Park Commission. That is, the project will dedicate cash inlieu of land, and small common areas shown on the plat will be owned and maintained by the homeowner's association. Two areas, however, remain to be addressed. Will the provate "tot lot" areas be developed as part of the project? If so, how? Will the conservation easements for wetland protection also include provisions for trail use? These questions should be resolved prior to the final plan stage of the review process. RECOMMENDATION The developer has modified his proposal consistent with previous staff and City official recommendations. The density of the project is within that which was established,in th~ Comprehensive Plan amendment for the site. It is therefore suggested that the Planning Commission recommend Concept Stage approval of the project t~;the City Council. It is futher suggested that the Commission recommend Development Stage approval subject to review and comment on the streets, grading, drainage and utilities by the City Engineer. g I ~ .. .. :u~i!!! t,:! : ;~=~~ f:~--. !~~~~ lei...~! i~ ~ . . ,. .. i: ~ ,. o .. .J' "- .r -......."....-....".......,.....,... ~---;woo~ i irT ' i I i I I I ~ , ~J g ~ i {~~ ~ ~ !~i;~~ 00 00 N .... -:4 ~ >>- O. )Io:€ ~n z., ~ ~ ~~ h ; oW" ~ ~ ~~ ! o S,"N .. .0 o ~. ~). ~i -4'" ...10) . UI~- ~ ~~7 r- > "'It.. ~ 0' c: '" ,..!=o < .-0:-' ~hn ... ..0 .1 ~~ ~ ~; )10 ~... o~ .. n , ~g -=-11.' ~:: q _:~l~I,1 E.eA ~q::; I . . -: :~; :!~;~i . o~:: : I PRELIMINARY 'PLAT COVINGTON VINE RIDGE f...... :.... ....~ :.: . : ! SATHRE. BERGQUIST, INC. n. I'" W"'IA'A ....,D. . ."'.cAr....... ..u. . .11..... .,.......... .CMIIl . RoullT SOMMER I ERIC CANTON . 1. -r- -,--- I - ," ~ ! i "I<";ll li 0;" Z;2 ~ = 0 ClM rili!~ U ~ .J ~~ 1=le: : ~;~~ :1~ifU 11 ie~a i:!::~ ~ ~ie~ i .. ~ ~.., : i I ~.t .. 5i1~!; :;: : i:I;:; leill_'jll.. o~...z a. ~. ~ ~ ~i ~ = ~i :; Cjlmj" ~ ~;~ :i ~?~ ~ !~g . ~z . >>" .. 0" ~ c", . ... ~ :;; , , I PH....ING PL...N ~... . . :.: f SATHRE. BERGQUIST, INC. n. IAII W.UIA n'fO. ,...\JIMA. _. tlUt . .,...... ... -l-!~:::!:~! z: ,\:gTW;::1 ROBERT SOMMER I ERIC C"'NTON COVINGTON VINE RIDGE . .> ---1 \ \ o , ,/ ~~\ // " \ //--:--- \,\ "" I \\ I, :J /; /i ~;/ -1 (-----r- , . I I I g:~ i" ~ .. .. _ON " " ~, .r r ~l ~t I :j ': I . v I I \_uuu _ ___~._ : ~ ~ !: -..--.. _0 Proposed ~...~ I' PROPOSED TRANSPORTATION PLAN ~. U Staff concept recommendation for southeast area of Shorewood .. ".."..~.. . Ii i " ~ ~ ili~~!l ~illi" ~m . ill" ~ ~~_: :~ee i!,g i .. .... .. II ...... 00 .... ~~ 01 i" ~a ;l "17;~1!1~!fl ~~~~:~.g~~~NRAO'tEpt:~ " COVINGTON VINE RIDGE ...,"''''... 'Olh ROBERT SOMMER I ERIC CANTON . ~LJ!' ,~ " f". .,' "0. =..: f" SATHRE. BERGQUIST, INC. '>>1"" ...,,...,.. ....,Oo . ."'fl..'........ 'UM . ."...", EK.D tl llll : i ~ , ) 11\..' I~'-'" '-''-. f' .. . WAITE .conTROl commllllon T'vV!(i Cities Rceo ~50 mETRO fOUARE BLDG. 7TH & ROBERT fTREETf fAInT PAUL mn 55101 61'2 '2'2'2.84'2~ :' ~, ~J . . .ft.JI::-Jtt \ {!W . I)J-r..f-I ~ March 2, 1984 Ms. Sandra Kennelly City Clerk City of Shore wood 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, MN 55331 RE: Rezoning Request of Eric Canton Northwest Quadrant of Covington Road and Vine Hill Road Dear Ms. Kennelly: The M=tropolitan Waste Control Carrnission has reviewed the Notice of Public Hearing regarding a rezoning request by Eric Canton of property located in the Ci ty of Shorewood. OUr review indicates that the Carmission is in possession of a sanitary sewer easement on or near the property as described in this notice. The Carmission has no objection to the rezoning of this property provided the land use and any development is consistent with the terms and conditions of our sani tary sewer easement and that access to our sanitary sewer facilities is maintained at all time. Very truly yours, C(2f2-r- C. R. Payne Acting Director of Engineering CRP: EJB: BJB ~.e. . PLANNI.OMMISSION MEETING TUESDA ARCH 6, 1984 page two Mr. Flaherty offered the following suggestions to allow them to keep it as an open rental unit. 1. 2 separate leases - one for office rental and a separate one on the apartment controlled directly by Rapid Oil Change. 2. Annual lease review by Council with immediate revocation if any problems arise. 3. 7 years (including the conditions in 2), at the end of which time the building will be torn down. *Planner Nielsen stated there may be some question as to whether a time limit could be pun on a C.U.P., and suggested checking with Attorney Larson. He did say he liked the idea of separate leases. Miles Lindberg asked if the problem could be handled under a "Developer's Agreement." Planner felt it might help. The question of whether or not a C.U.P. would carry to a new owner was raised. Planner Nielsen said it would. Watten moved, Leslie seconded, to recommmend to Council to allow the Conditional Use Permit for an apartment but only under the conditions contained in Ordinance No. 152 (caretaker apartment-Gary Minion-Shorewood Nursery). Motion carried unanimously by Roll Call Vote - Reese, Boyd, Benson, Wattenand Leslie. ( 8:00 PUBLIC HEARING - COVINGTON VINE RIDGE - REZONING FROM R-l, SINGLE FAMILY DISTRICT TO P.U.D., PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT. The Public Hearing opened at 8:25 PM. Mr. Eric Canton and Mr. Rick Sathre were present to represent Covington Vine Ridge. They pointed out the changes made: the removal of the two northerly cul-de-sacs, changes the road to a large loop with both ends opening onto Covington Road; and the rearrangement of open areas, placing an outlot in the center of the knoll to provide a play space to keep the children out of the streets, with trails connect- ing to the other open spaces. They stated they will maintain these open areas. They wish to work with the Park Commission regarding trailways, they would like to have the trail restricted to a specific location through the wetlands. Streets Engineer Norton had stated that there should be a 13'-15' r.o.w. on each side of the paved surface. Covington Vine Ridge proposes a 30'-32' hard surface, a 50' r.o.w., with a 10' easement across the fronts of the lots on each side. Traffic The traffic will move in a circular pattern with exits/entrances on Covington Road. 3~ . PLA~G COMMISSION MEETING TUESDAY, MARCH 6, 1984 page three (' Lot/Block Numbers The marking on presented plat was questioned. Covington Vine Ridge said they will mark accordingly with Blocks and Lots as part of a final plat. Easements- Water/Sewer/Drainage Covington Vine Ridge will provide 20' easements on side lot lines for drainage and utilities only where necessary. All others are proposed to be 10' (5' on each side of the lot line). House Plans Near mountain in Chanhassen was used as an example. They discussed "walkouts" around the knoll overlooking the wetlands. Planner Nielsen said there is a 43 foot difference from the top of the knoll to the wetland area. Public portion of meeting closed at 8:41 with no public comment. Water This issue remains undecided. Acting Council Liaison Haugen said the water issue will be discussed at the April 7th meeting. Commissioner Reese said he would not recommend 64 individual wells. l Metro Waste Dumping Council Liaison Haugen informed Covington Vine Ridge that Metro Waste had contacted the City for permission to dump septic tanks into a manhole on Covington Road. She suggested they contact Metro Waste regarding this situation. Soil Boring Commissioner Reese asked if the property has been soil tested. The answer was not yet. Reese moved, Watten seconded, to recommend to Council that they approve the Concept and Development Plan for Covington Vine Ridge, including the Preliminary Plat, subject to review and comments by the City Engineer. Motion carried unanimously by roll call vote - Benson, Boyd, Reese, Watten and Leslie. SHOREWOOD CONDOMINIUMS - DEVELOPMENT STAGE APPROVAL Graydon R. Boeck, Engineer and Bill Gage, their Design Consultant were present. Items discussed were: Screeing on North side of property Building angle - Tingewood preferred different angle but had to do it the way shown on the plan to meet the 50' setback. ~ Drainage - Tingewood has talked to Tom Thumb about using their back area to aid in directing the drainage. Tom Thumb, according to Tingewood, was agreeable to the idea. . . Animal Control Contract Page 2 of 3 7. AT the time that an animal impounded under this contract is reclaimed, WBAC or its agent shall collect the impounding fee and boarding charges as provided by City Ordinance. WBAC shall furnish monthly reports to the City as required as to the service or services rendered in connection with each animal impounded. All impounding fees, license fees and/or any other penalty fees collected by WBAC or its agent shall be remitted to the City. 8. In the event an animal impounded and boarded by order of the City Health Officer or placed under quarantine by ruling of the State Board of Health, said animal shall be boarded as required by said order or ruling. At the end of such period, the City releases all of its interests, right and control over said animals which may then be disposed of at the discretion of WBAC. In the event that any dogs, cats, or other impounded animals are unclaimed after five (5) days, they shall become the property of WBAC and may be disposed of or sold at their discretion. All proceeds from the disposition of such animals may be retained by WBAC, including any proceeds received from any animals disposed of in accordance to Minnesota Statutes 35.71. 9. The CITY shall furnish to WBAC any special forms or receipts specified in the Ordinance and WBAC shall keep records of all animals impounded together with a description of the same. 10. WBAC shall assume liability for all harm to animals due to it negligence or that of its agents in not properly caring for the same, and agrees to defend any lawsuits arising therefrom. WBAC shall defend, indemnify and hold the City harmless including its officers, employees, or agents from any and all claims, suits, losses, damages, or expenses on account of bodily injuries, sickness, disease, death and property damage including injury to animals and the result of, or alleged to be the result of the animal patrol service operation. Upon request, WBAC shall provide the City proof of public liability insurance including comprehensive automobile liability in an amount of at least $200,000 per each claimant and $600,000 per occurrence. 11. The CITY agrees to pay WBAC for services in the performance of this contract as follows: A) Price per hour - per ambulance for scheduled patrol based on actual time in service for the City..................$17.00 B) Price per call - per ambulance for unscheduled service during regular working hours of 7 a.m. to 6 p.m. weekdays.....$20.00 C) Price per call - per ambulance for service during other than scheduled or regular working hours.......................$30.00 D) Price per animal - for each 24 hours or fraction thereof for boarding any species of animals impounded by direction of City officials or local ordinance..........................$5.15 E) Price per animal - for euthanasia of dog or cat...............$7.00 (;/ Jh,-f/J !I~./1 ~ Jll1lmal' (JOJ'lt/ltJ/ ) ::ti:L/ a-J . . 7. In the event an animal impounded and boarded by order of the City Health Officer or placed under quarantine by ruling of the State Board of Health, said animal shall be boarded as required by said order or ruling. At the end of such period, the City releases all of its interests, right and control over said animals which may then be disposed of at the discretion of Contractor. In the event that any dogs. cats, or other impounded animals are unclaimed after five (5) days. they shall become the property of Contract and may be disposed of or sold at their discretion. All proceeds from the disposition of such animals may be retained by Contractor. including any proceeds received from any animals disposed of in accordance to Minnesota Statutes 35.71. 8. The City shall furnish to Contractor all license forms. pound receipts and license tags as specified in the Ordinance and Contractor shall keep records of all animals impounded together with a description of the same. 9. Contractor shall furnish all vehicles with two way radios and/or other communication equipment and agrees to service and maintain said equipment. 10. Upon request, Contractor shall provide to the City proof of public liability insurance including comprehensive automobile liability in an amount of at least $100.000 per each claimant and 5300.000 per occurrence. 11. Contractor agrees that during the period of this contract it will not, within the State of Minnesota. discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race. color. creed, sex. national origin. or ancestry and will include a similar provision in all subcontracts entered into for the performance hereof. This paragraph is inserted in this contract to comply with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes 181.59. :tv . , " "4 ~" ~ ",,\;,\.,1 'y, \t. ~... .:'t \ . l} ,.1, 4 J \) , '\N'" 'r {, , "" 12. The City agrees to pay Contractor for service~ in the performance of this contract as follows: ~ O~ .,}" a. Base fee for Administrative Services (per month) $ ,--51 ~ C:)CJ .k- j {II 0;; t fjI\ b. Price per hour per ambul,ance for furnishing Patrol Ambulance for scheduled r\ .~. r\J ~l"" ,..} patrol. (actual time in service for the City) /j - /i v v $ / ,,'. _-;J I,j c. Price for each 24 hours or fraction thereof for boarding any species of animal impounded by direction of City officials or local ordinan~e. .~)-. 35 d. Price per animal for destroying dogs or cats. /7. <:/0 $ e. Price per hour per ambulance for service during other than scheduled or regular working hours including travel time (Special Service). Minimum call. one hour. / /i . ~-() $ . /. ~ / ' (m//;/J./)/?/;;}:l/ 12*01 ~tlIU) L577::!J!;O-'! ~,yLZL'. /ci. C~jc) /7.7 C/rJ /~!W....h.y..b (.~.1~ bC./~ L~,h/JG.... ~L P2 ~ ~~ut:,;... 0' .; // /J'....,/) /f of' //,// /:.....,.r.. ,/~.../ lt~ . . CITY OF SHOREWOOD MAYOR Robert Rascop COUNCIL Jan Haugen Tad Shaw Kristi Stover Robert Gagne ADMINISTRATOR Doug Uhrhammer 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD . SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 . (612) 474-3236 MEMORANDUM TO: PLANNING COMMISSION, MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: BRAD NIELSEN DATE: 30 MARCH 1984 RE: HINKLEY, THOMAS - SIMPLE SUBDIVISION FILE NO.: 405 (84.07) Mr. Thomas Hinkley is the owner of a small apartment building located at 24530 Smithtown Road (see Site Location map, Exhibit A). The property is currently zoned C-3, General Commercial. A recent property survey, shown as Exhibit B of this report, revealed that his building encroaches onto the lot which borders it on the north and east. The owner of the adjoining property has agreed to convey 15 feet of his property to Mr. Hinkley so that the boundary line will no longer cut through the building. Shorewood's "simple subdivision" prov1.s1.ons are intended primarily for situations such as Mr. Hinkley's, where adjustment of property lines is necessary. Although the property in question will still be a bit smaller than current zoning would allow, the nonconformity is being decreased and the additional 15 feet will provide the existing building with a conforming rear yard setback. It is suggested that the Planning Commission should recommend that the simple subdivision be approved subject to the applicant submitting new legal descriptions for the two properties. Also,within 30 days of receipt of the Council resolution approving the division, the applicant should demonstrate that the division and recombination has been recorded with the County. cc: Sandy Kennelly Gary Larson Thomas Hinkley Sue Niccum BJN:pr A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore b'a- ~ '\lt~ -y>..f6 $l:.L N :t 'f I ii 18 I 19 ~ 20 '"' I ~f) (?) 1_(1-1) I ,DO i i \~l ... . .. >> ~, ~ I I . >\; 17 , i......t- I \ ..i ~~ 'y..~c . ~ . c..,-.J- <0 ~-' I' ~ \J/ C . , I . III (.,... ) A IE .,s "1\ c 0 ~ 1: '" ~, Z .. e , , ... C!- \1 II ... 0 , I 0 5A' r- 'I III . ..I .. ..I -= --1 ..I'> ..1.- : > - 22~ (~ (~) ""-,',.- ----J n.,( . \PI ~ ~ I ". 'Cl .,. I ~ C :.. ~ \~\ \-- ~ZD.ll -r' IjfJ"JO \~ (JI) /tXJ '21 " LOT 26 ~,,) if\ Q",~11b(\ b ~ \!~ .[lj ...) ....../ () \ . ~..... ' r:- '. A.' . .~..., r::-':5 1.3 . .....J \ . "',1 \ E:~lli bi t A SIT:':; LOCArrON Hinkley - simple subdivision III . . - ~ CERTIFICATE DF SURVEY . MOORES S~L€S ~UTO FOAl ".'44,22'" ..... ""''', ," ... 81.20'" line of Lol 25 ~o .,," ~ (T ,... I ... D/~Q~e .~ '0 .s ,... "'It ,... !!:: / t \ .... '4" : ... " c: OJ t : \I -ie- o co 2 "'j ~O' 'i -: o -~ ...!. - :r- o ~ L..::t: 8.. .,8 .~...... -.,)0 '.-, 3 · .<>>~ .. ." :: '.:" 2'~.,:', ,.': . ~, 1 ..~ 40 "'It Q ii id) / Cone. area rLir,epo,-oJlel wifl, norJh /ine '1:1~. of JM 2S ." : \ \ " 'r2,Il' , ~...:/. 'j' ...... : .~ -::: ~ t&) 1/."; ~~ \ I ''1., \)'6 '$ sr ~ :n ~ '::J: o U "- o lU .~ - " . .. " ~. ~ "G1 a~ 18 f:.. lI\"'It (TO" ;: ,... ~ ~ "'j -c -.... 'i I .' . ", .. ..... I \. ,.,) I '-../ . CI,) / ", I qt " ., JL- ~l~~ - . 13s~jrHTOWN - -!! 1 &.. ~ .:J ... ' ..J ~ ~rri,th~oylO l:2ood N.line 0 ( 00'" ~- ...~ --1 , L-r- ~ ~ ~ I of Lof Z& ... S. ,oe ~ 'l~.;' SE.Cor 01 Lo "'1~.lefl" J20AD EJcJ'li bi t B EXI3~r.:~pG BOUlJD.igtY,..JUIiv-r.:d.I - . . ----- . CERTIFICATE DF SURVEY FaAI . MOORES ~UTO SALE'S ..' "'44.22'" ..-...... .... "'81.20'" ...... .....~. 'to.~'oo" y...... l Norlh line of Lol 2S 8CJ024'OO" ........... Cone. area orollel ""ilh norlh line Z& \...) I . ......y I 4$t( ~. If ,,'1?t.'8S" k ~I~er' ,/~I J20AD - ... .~3s;;1j"n~TOW'" ~o .1\' ,... 'It r- ~ i 0/"0""1" ~ /0 .s u & ~ :::t:0" 'i -: o -"4: ,..!. - :r- ~ ~ o::t a... QI<3 .S::_ ....Jo ~..../. 1/.1 ~~ I ~. ~ Q)41 Q~ 8~ :) ~~ d) - . . . "r ..... .' . . . . ~ (F ,.. l , \,.......: ... (;) I . ..., .;.. o ex) 2 . ~, 1 ..~ 40 15' to ..... .....) . . g: ~ ::n l. '::J:: <3 ....... 0 Q) c ..:.: r- ~ ~ !! -c ....... 'i - ~ - e a.. ~ .:.J ... . ...J .... III (I) c: QI QJ L 0"') L.. ~ cu '1; Rood I ~rn,th~o~O N.line 0 ( ...~.. -^r ~'-~ Lof 2& i 2S,'" SE.Cor 01 Lo Exhibit C PROPOSED DIVISION/COKBINArIC)1J "'.. t - . . LAW OFFICES WILLIAM F. KELLY AND ASSOCIATES WILLIAM F. KELLY JOHN C. SANDERS MARK W. KELLY 3151 SECOND STREET EXCELSIOR. MINNESOTA 1515331 (612) 474-11&177 March 28, 1984 Shorewood City Council Shorewood City Hall 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, MN 55331 Re: Howard E. Shenehon and Mary Goodlund Shady Island Properties Ladies and Gentlemen: On November 14, 1983 the City Council on a vote of 5 Nays and 0 Yeas disapproved a request by my clients, Howard E. Shenehon and Mary Goodlund, to subdivide property jointly owned by them and located on Shady Island into three equal size lots of 18,783 square feet. The request had previously been heard at a public hearing held by the Shorewood Planning Commission and was approved on a 4 to 3 vote. The property 1n question 1S legally described as: The westerly 50 feet of Lot 17, all of Lots 18, 19, and 20 Shady Island. The parcel contains 56,381 square feet of land, and has 320 feet of Minnetonka lakeshore. At present there is a small cottage on Lot 19. The property was platted prior to the existence of the City of Shorewood and is served by a platted street 15 feet in width. The three full sized platted lots plus part of 17 have square footage as follows: Approximate Square Feet Lot 20 20,000 13.,380 23,000 56,380 Lot 18 and part of 17 Lo t 19 .11- 76- . . WlLUAM F. KELLY AND ASSOCIATES, ATTORNEYS -2- The property is located in the R-l zone which requires 40,000 square feet as a minimum size lot in order to use the same as a building site. All lots on this island are currently served with municipal sewer; this partic- ular property has been assessed for two sewer assessments. My clients inherited the property from their father who purchased the property prior to the incorporation of the City of Shorewood and prior to the passage of any zoning ordinance which might apply to this property. It is their desire to use their inheritance by dividing the property into three buildable parcels, sell one and each build or use the remaining lots for their respective purposes. We are again bringing this matter before the City Council to ask for council approval to authorize a division of the property into three lots as originally platted plus the addition of part of Lot 17 to Lot 18 - all as follows: Parcel One: Lot 18 & Westerly 50 feet of 17 Shady Island Parcel Two: Lot 19 Shady Island Parcel Three: Lot 20 Shady Island We are not asking for subdivision, nor for var~ances. Having set out the background in this matter and our present request, we ask your indulgence in permitting us to present to you our position to support this request. We are familiar with the section 10 subd. 2, which reads ~n part as follows: If two or more lots or combinations of lots and portions of lots with continuous fronta~e in single ownership are of record at the t~me of passage or amendment of this Ordinance, and if all or part of the lots do not meet the require- ments for lot width and area as established by this Ordinance, the lands involved shall be con- . . WILLIAM F. KELLY AND ASSOCIATES, ATTORNEYS -3- considered to be an undivided parcel for the pur- poses of this Ordinance, and no portion of said parcel shall be used or sold which does not meet lot and width and area requirements established by this Ordinance, nor shall any division of the parcel be made which leaves remainin~ any lot with width or area below the requlrements stated in this ordinance. It is our opinion that the above provision has validity o~ly if the section of the ordinance setting the minimum lot Slze to which property must conform has validity and has been fol- lowed and equally enforced against all similarly situated properties. Based on facts applicable to this property, the enforcement of the 40,000 square foot minimum is, in our opinion, an arbitrary and capricious exercise of the zoning power and one which has in the past not been even-handedly enforced against similar properties. A zoning classification, including lot size, will generally be upheld and presumed valid if it bears a substantial re- lation to public health, safety, comfort and public welfare. There must always be a reasonable basis upon which to re- quire a restriction such as a 40,000 square foot lot mini- mum, or the restriction will fail and the presumption of validity will also fail. The city planner supplied the Planning Commission and the Council with his analysis and recommendation on the original request. He pointed out that my clients are faced with high real estate taxes on a parcel with 320 feet of lakeshore. It should be added that such a tax burden on an arbitrarily large parcel of lakeshore residential property reduces the value of the property to its detriment without a correspond- ing public benefit resulting from such a limitation. This is true when surrounding properties are all of a smaller size and the restricting limitation has not been enforced against similar dimension reduction requests. Even though economic considerations alone do not justify variances they do come into play when the public welfare requirement . . WILLIAM F. KELLY AND ASSOCIATES, ATTORNEYS -4- and need is compared to the resulting economic loss imposed due to the limitation. If there can be found no reasonable basis to impose such economic loss, the restriction limita- tion (40,000 square feet) will fall. The planner recognizes this fundamental limitation when he said to the Council in his report: "However, a lot size analysis of Shady Island suggests that the existing zoning is inappropriate." He goes on to say that the current Comprehensive Plan recog- nized this and "designated land use for the island as one to two units per acre." The previous Comprehensive Plan for the island which was also adopted by the Council approved l~ to 3 units per acre for the island. No prior Council looking at the island within the past sev- eral years considered 40,000 feet an appropriate lot minimum to which land owners must be held to comply. In 1974 when the Shorewood Council spread a sewer assessment against this particular property, it required the property to pay for two sewer assessments; this assessment carries with it the right to hook up two residential houses to the city sewer lines. It too recognIZed the inappropriateness of the 40,000 square feet minimum. This Council has frequently ignored its claimed m~n~mum and authorized lot separations without regard to zoning limitations. On Shady Island it permitted lots 38, part of 39, lot 37 and lot 36 Shady Island to be broken off into three lots, result- ing in lot 36 being established as a separate building site of 22,600 square feet and lot 37 one of 19,900 square feet. Both of these newly created lots compare equally with two of the proposed lots my clients are asking to be approved. In addition, lots 4 and 5, Shady Island, were authorized to be divided creating lots of 24,000 and 16,000 respectively. . . WILUAM F. KELLY AND ASSOCIATES, ATTORNEYS -5- Lot 33 was permitted to be divided into 3 parts creating lots of 26,000 and 17,000 square feet. In addition, the same policy has been followed for property divisions on Enchanted Island. The comprehensive plan recognizes the arbitrariness of R-l 40,000 square feet lot zoning. It states lots on the islands are as small as 15,000 square feet -- actually they are small as 10,000 to 12,000 square feet. As pointed out in the plan, these islands "orient strongly toward Spring Park - Mound area", a small lot area. If 40,000 square feet has any val- idity, it has so only on the mainland. This Council by its pr10r acts has shown that it agrees with us: that a 40,000 square foot minimum is not a reasonable exercise of its zoning authority on Shady Island. The Council certainly must have looked at the area - the existing lot sizes, its approved Comprehensive Plans, its sewer system, the area's recreational facilities when it previously determined not to comply with its own ordinance. It must have considered that such a provision was not needed to preserve the character of the neighborhood or to stabilize property values or it would not have acted as it did in the past. Nor do we think this Council would permit the shape of older platted lots to affect the right to use the same for building sites; such a policy does not correlate with older lot plat- tings in the city which this Council has in the past authorized to be developed as single family residences, particularly those adjacent to the water. A look at the city plats will disclose lots are not 100 x 250 or 200 x 400; they come in all sizes and shapes and have been made into quality lake shore home- sites. To claim dimension as a basis for declining to ap- prove this division would be truly unjust and unreasonable. The same is true of the size or width of the platted street serving this property. There are streets and roads in this city - public and private - which are from 15 to 20 feet in width serving far more than three properties. Certain of such streets serve some of the more desirable and expensive home sites in the city. The width of the access road has never in the past deterred this Council from granting build- ing permits or lot divisions of property served by 15 foot roads. " ~ . . WILLIAM F. KELLY AND ASSOCIATES, ATTORNEYS -6- We feel that this Council desires to treat all property owners in the area and in the city in a similar and equal fashion - that only the lack of correct information re- sulted in the adoption of resolution 91-83. We ask the Council to approve the division of the subject, property along previously platted lot lines as set out herein - that is, into three parcels of buildable property as follows: Parcel 1 Lot 18 and the westerly 50 feet of 17 Shady Island Parcel 2 Lot 19 Shady Island Parcel 3 Lot 20 Shady Island ~. J;E{? WFK: e k ccs: Howard E. Shenehon Mary Goodlund . . MAYOR Robert Rascop COUNCI L Jan Haugen Tad Shaw Kristi Stover Robert Gagne ADMINISTRATOR Doug Uhrhammer CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD . SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 · (612) 474-3236 MEMORANDUM TO: PLANNING COMMISSIO~,MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: BRAD NIELSEN DATE: 30 MARCH 1984 RE: TRIVESCO - PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT FILE NO.: 405 (84.05) Enclosed please find plans for the proposed development of approximately 107 acres located between Highway 7 and Covington Road, west of Vine Hill Road (see Site Location map - Exhibit A, attached). Mr. John Uban, representing Trivesco, Inc., will make the preapplication stage presentation of a Comprehensive Plan amendment at the 3 April Planning Commission meeting. In brief the developer is proposing 9 acres of commercial property adjacent to the south service road of Highway 7, 160 units of multiple family residential south of the commercial, and 93 single family lots on the remaining 62 acres. A more detailed explanation of the proposal is contained in a memo from the applicant dated March 1984 (Exhibit Bl-4, attached) . Given the size of the proposal it is suggested that the Planning Commission carefully review the Comprehensive Plan prior to the 3 April meeting. Initial staff review suggests that in spite of higher intensity use on the northerly portion of the site, th€ overall concept is consistent with the planning principles set forth in the Comprehensive Plan. It is worth noting that the proposed circulation pattern for the project, particularly the collector street and the new intersection on Highway 7, is consistent w.ith recent staff proposals for the area. A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore r?LL- -..-.. ----,.--"-" ~ > ~ :;: -..-"-.' Exhibit A SHE LOCArION rrivesco - Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezoning . . . I . . I Nor~ , , ,,&:=, . . I C I . I . . I ?/STMAS LAKE I I I I I "-"1( -..-..-..-.--- --.--~ \ : .). .' SHOREWOOD PUD AND COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT MARCH 1984 by TRIVESCO 1. CONCEPT DESCRIPTION We propose a tier of land uses starting with the area immediately adjacent to Highway 7 and the Mini-storage area (to the east). Using the frontage road system a.long Highway 7 ,as commerc ial access, we think that a high quality commercial area would be appropriate. To help facilitate the traffic movements we propose a new intersection with Highway 7 at the northwest corner of the property. This will also greatly reduce the traffic movements at the dangerous Vine Hill intersection. The commercial uses we contemplate at this time are: restaurants, retail, professional service, office, and supermarket with gas service. There will be a design framework manual controlling all aspects of the development providing consistancy and high quality. The overall criteria will create a strong residential character to all portions of the proposed PUD. Adjacent to and south of the commercial area, we propose a multiple family area as a transition and buffer to the remainder of the property. The buildings will reflect the exclusive style of architecture proposed for the single family area. There will be access directly to the Highway 7 intersection eliminating the multiple family traffic from other residential areas. Additionally, a buffering open space and park trail on the east will separate this area from Shady Hills Road. The remainder of the property will be developed as single family lots of approximately 20,000 square feet. From the Highway 7 intersection a collector road will run along the western edge of the property "teeing" into Covington Road at the southwest corner of the property. Because of the hilly terrain several cul-de-sacs are used to best develop the area without extensive grading. A connecting east-west road will connect to Vine Hill Road crossing a seasonal creek. We propose a small pond at this crossing with a mill run. The access and lot development are difficult at Vine Hill Road. We will provide a cul-de-sac for the property to the north, but also request that the northeast cul-de-sac of Covington Vine Ridge development be extended to serve a few of our lots eliminating the need for direct access driveways onto the steep Vine Hill Road. For public use we propose a completely developed neighborhood park nestled between two hills in the southern portion of the development. The park will include a combination hockey rink and sand lot, open ball field, small winter pond (with hydrant for water), two tennis courts, and gazebo with play structure. In addition a trail corridor will connect to the Highway 7 frontage road for pedestrian access from adjoining neighborhoods and the multi-family area. 1 ~~;D..t ~-l e) ei 2.. GENERAL INFORMATION a. Landowners: Virginia Cliford Trust Horace G. Merfin et al Rebers Construction Company b. Applicants: TRIVESCO: a partnership (including the following) Steiner and Koppelman, Inc. 18338 Minnetonka Bouleva~ Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 Robert H. Mason Homes 14201 Excelsior Boulevard Minnetonka, Minnesota 55343 Mark Z. Jones Associates, Inc. 5290 Villa Way Edina, Minnesota 55436 c. Consultants: Jeremy Scott Steiner (Attorney) Vesely, Miller Associates 400 Northwestern Bank Building Hopkins, Minnesota 55343 d. Control: 3. PRESENT STATUS Howard Dahlgren (Planner) Howard Dahlgren Associates, Inc. One Groveland Terrace, Suite 102 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55403 Copies of pertinent contractural agreements are included herein. a. Property Description: 107:t acres of land south of'Trunk Highway 7, north of Covington Road, and east of Vine Hill Road in the City of Shorewood, Minnesota, located in the south half of Section 25 and the north half of Section 36, Township 117 North, Range 23 West, Hennepin County. ' Zoning and Land Use: The property is presently zoned R-l and for pasture and woods, rural homestead, and vacant land. The area along Highway 7 has commercial uses with Brom's Market. this area has been scraped and filled in previous years. b. c. Surrounding property is shown on the enclosed drawings. 2 is used northern Also, ~...~ . . 4. SITE CONDITIONS Existing conditions are shown on the enclosed.drawings and include topo- graphic slopes, drainage areas, general soils, and vegetation. Our generalized concept will generate approximately 3,800 trips per day of vehicular traffic. Two thirds or more will access directly to Highway 7. Commercial Mul tiple Family Single Family Public Park: 2,100 ADT 800 ADT 850 ADT 50 ADT 5. Our generalized concept plan is included showing our arrangement of both public and private uses. 6. DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY Total Acres 107.00 acres Park 4.84 acres o~en Space 3.74 acres Right-of-Way 14. 54 acres NET ACREAGE: 83.88 acres Single Family 62.01 acres Lots: Density: Average Lot Size: 95 1.5 du/ac 29,045 s.f. Multiple Family 12.79 acres. . . Units: Density: 160 12.5 du/ac Commercial 9.08 acres 7. We are concurrently proposing a POD with our Comprehensive Plan Amendment. The entire area will be zoned to POD and controlled by the POD agreements. The following is an approximate zoning description of the different uses: R-2 Single Family Areas R-5 Multiple Family Areas C-3 Connercial Area 8. CITY REVIEW TIMETABLE The following is a timetable for approvals at the City of Shorewood. W. 3 e,.!> . . MAYOR Robert Rascop COUNCIL Jan Haugen Tad Shaw Kristi Stover Robert Gagne ADMIN ISTRA TOR Doug Uhrhammer CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD . SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 . (612) 474-3236 MEMORANDUM TO: PLANNING COMMISSION, MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: BRAD NIELSEN DATE: 30 MARCH 1984 RE: JUMAR MOTOR HOME RENTAL - PROPOSED REZONING FILE NO.: 405 (84.08) BACKGROUND As explained in the attached (Exhibit B, attached) memo, Marvin and Judy Janicke are considering the purchase of the home now owned by Jim Borchert, 5580 County Road 19 (see Site Location map - Exhibit A, attached). They propose to live in the existing house and also use the property for their motor home rental business. Exhibit C contains a sketch plan showing the proposed layout of the site. The property is approximately an acre in size and is currently zoned R-4, Multiple Family Residential. Surrounding land use and zoning are as follows: North and West - undeveloped, zoned R-4 (an 18 unit apartment building was approved for the site but has not been built). South - vacant single family residence, zoned C-3, General Commercial (Concept Stage approval has been granted for a 39 unit condominium building - see Shorewood Condominiums). East shopping center across County Road 19 in Tonka Bay, zoned Commercial. The Janicke's proposal will require changing the zoning of the property to some commercial district. Since outdoor rental is not specifically listed as a permitted, accessory or conditional use in any of our existing commercial districts, the request will undoubtedly also involve an amendment to the text of the Ordinance and possibly a conditional use permit. Since the peak season for their business is fast approach- ing, they have asked to present their proposal to the Planning Commission and Council on an informal basis at this time. It is hoped A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore qtL . MEMO FR~HE PLANNER JUMAR M~ HOME RENTAL PROPOSED REZONING 30 MARCH 1984 page two that they can receive some direction from the City as to the acceptance of their proposal prior to filing a formal rezoning/ text amendment/C. D.P. application. Although they have been advised that a firm commitment from the City is unlikely without a formal application, they hope to be able to receive enough input to determine whether the proposal is worth pursuing or whether they should look for another site. ANALYSIS/RECOMMENDATION As in any request for a change in land use, a number of issues must be considered in the decision-making process. At this stage of the request the issues can be boiled down to two primary questions: 1) Is the proposed use generally acceptable for the site and area for which it is proposed?, and 2) If rezoned to accommodate the proposal, are other uses which would be allowed by the new zoning district appropriate for the site and area? It is highly possible that although a specific proposal may, in itself, be a reasonable use of property, the necessary zoning may not be acceptable. The current Zoning Ordinance does not specifically address outdoor rental in any district. As such the proposal would require an amendment to the text, in addition to a rezoning. Section 200.20 Subdivision 4.e. (pg. 111-27) of the new Zoning Ordinance does allow "open or outdoor service, sale and rental as a principal or accessory use..." under certain specific conditions. The question is whether or not other uses in the C-2 District would be acceptable. It is suggested that City officials consider the uses allowed by both the existing and proposed ordinances in reviewing the Jumar proposal. Another possibility to consider is whether or not a lesser commercial district, either the R-C or C-1, could be amended to accommodate the use. Worth noting is that the C-1 District was recently amended to allow rental storage as a conditional use, but only when totally enclosed within a structure. A final consideration is the mixture of commercial and residential activity. This has been addressed recently in three various requests: 1) Minnesota Mini-Storage (see Tex-Sota rezoning'and C.D.P.); 2) Shorewood Nursery; and 3) Rapid Oil conditional use permit. The Janicke's proposal is in line with the Planning Commission's recommendation on all three requests - to allow one residential unit only when accessory to some other principal use, and only when the unit is occupied by the owner or an employee of the business. As previously mentioned no specific decision can be made until a formal application has been made. However, the applicants should be given some idea as to whether or not their proposal is worth pursuing. cc: Sandy Kennelly Gary Larson Jim Norton Sue Niccum Marvin and Judy Janicke BJN:pr ~,?VJ (: ~ '" Q-\) (1-"') . l,1 Z'!'" /00 63 "'-'-'- ,..pi ~'\~W; h~~ ~,\C,1~ .....\i n'L~ N;tl ~ ~I _ )~: ,.,,! 18 ~ 19 ~i 20: 21 ~ll 22 ~I r) i I ~~) ~) I (1-1) (1.1) (yr) I- I I I v(' (~I) 11\ 23~ ~ I . " h... ._J f, , 1,_ i ,00 . >_' 11 , \../' I ,ZIO 1/ropt rr)' 'H\ O~~1\o~ LOT 26 ~'\o) i ~i ~i, ....--\,'~L, I I \ CD '~I .~ ~ I {;hll. ' 01 I Q \ .,~ ~:} ~l \ 414. t.,.. -..,.l ...) (':;i .~, '" ~ \ ~---- ~ ~I ro... :::;::hi bi t A 3rm LOCArIOlJ 13~' JUK..l\.R Kotor Home Rental - Proposed ,. Rezoning } 0_. ! \!") o " o .)00 · o. c ~~.. w'c a:Q~ O~Z % 0 en : ... C)u JO 'I I 11 ill I , l I' 11 r- 'I -=--1 > c . c ~ z o ... o . "" II: o % en lI. lI. 0 : !Al . ..I C ..I ..I '" > ..I;::! > 1 ~ . . ... . ..... .0 .... I ~ C :" \c.\) \-- ZZOIZ -y \~ '? 15~' 'C.J , / U fl,!4J h . ~ I~c.l' ~ S1~';' ~ <) 1/ I) ~ ~ (11) ~ ,slH 14-I.U ~ . . APPLICATION FOR CONPITIONAL USE PERMIT 5580 County Road 19 Shorewood JUMAR Motor Home Rental is a family owned and operated business that leases class "A" luxury motor homes to vacationers. We have been in operation for one year. During that year, the business operated in Minnesota from May to October and then moved to Orlando Florida from November to May 1984. We intend to continue this practice. We pride ourselves on our personal service. Our clientele consists primarily of families. We do not now, nor intend to start selling any parts or vehicles. Our intention is to continue to purchase new units, keeping them approximately four years. The provides continuity and keeps the luxury image. We have made an offer on the home of Mr and Mrs Jim Borchert 5580 County Road 19 in Shorewood. The purpose of purchasing this home is to allow us to operate our business and reside at the same address, saving us both time and money. We are asking for a conditional use permit or a rezoning of this property to facilitate same. We would like to present the points on which we would appreciate your consideration. Use of yard space - We plan to resurface the existing driveway and add a driveway to a parking pad on the south side of the property which will be either asphalt or crushed rock to accomo- date three motor homes. The north side of the driveway would be utilized at a later date after careful planning. Natural drainage would be maintained or drain tile installed. Eventually this space could accomodate five motor homes. Our business plan includes three units in 1984, five units in 1986 and a total of eight units by 1991. We have been informed that the ground on the south side is well compacted and should not create any drainage problems. Parking space for four customer cars would be available, though normally no more than one would be needed. 8-1 Exhibit B DESCRIPTION OF p~QUEsr . . landscape live trees, shrubs and bushes now existing would be maintained on all sides of the property. Additional planting to allow for privacy and to maintain a residential atmosphere would be done after we see how thick the current growth is. The appearance from County Road 19 would be basically the same, a large expanse of front lawn and a well kept home. Fence The pool and back yard would be fenced as per code. Material used would be a cedar off set board fence similar to the one existing. This would be done immediately. Office What is currently the family room would become an office. It allows entry without entering the house allowing us to maintain a normal family living pattern. It is not visible from the street, but at the back of the house. Garage The only planned structural change would be an addition of approximately three feet to the height of the garage and to build forward approximately four feet to facilitate the installation of an 111 garage overhead garage door. Our plan is that this would transpire in approximately two years. This would allow us to change oil and clean the vehicles out of the weather. NO MECHANICAL WORK would be done on the premisis. No change will be made to the house itself. It will be our home and we will be living in it. Signing We are asking for a wooden sign approximately 3x5 with routed letters similar to the sign that Shorewood Nursery has be allowed on the property adjacent to County Road 19. ~,~ . . Timing If business continues at the rate we anticipate the units will seldom be on the premises. They will be in Florida from November to May. Average summer rental is seven to ten days. Last year we allowed two days between rental to clean and service the unit. This means that the units are actually on the site a minimum amount of days. The majority of our business is done by telephone. A few families come to look before renting, but if they do an appointment would be made and we try to allow time for negotiations, so it would be unlikely that two parties would be on site at one time. By working by telephone and mail, we feel that the traffic pattern created by our business would not create a problem for Shorewood. We will be living in this beautiful house and making it our home. Our business is based on personal service. The cozy office, large expanse of lawn, trees and landscaping would create the atmosphere that we choose to convey. We wouldn't want to change our image or jepardize our relationship with the community by changing or adding anything that would detract. We would appreciate your consideration. If there are further questions, please call Judy at work 474-0844 or we are home after 5 472-1318. Thank you ~~ ~ l~ n- ~t ~l ; i t ! I i I i I I , I I I ~I Z "~""zs:-. 1_._> ' _-;5'0.;h - ~ / ~\: '-, - I - -'. "r j '~~.....~~ .. io \ ~/- -11~ h~~ \ ~- ~~ l!j , 1 \.Il rJ ' 7.' \ It { , ~I' '" I ~ \ 1 ~. \ ~Q i"'" \ ~.;z \ ~ - ~~' \ [ h il .2 .~ . ~. .. .:., . '. , -;. "'>=,..;, . .; ~~ :. -;;,.:'..:', . ~:-" ,.. ,,- '.. .., ~ J:; "', ,.-." ~ .,~ ,).~'. ,,~ .. .__,:"..... i '" '!t" ....,. ~. t ,. l! Q tI ,~ V e~! ti p.~~ N S ~\l.l H J 1~1II 91 g od t -gl 1 r ~lt)-\l , ~2~i.t :J ~~~ll ~ -ra~4~1ll itlnll.. I n:.~:n jd1k , ~~~1li , I I , ~~ K~ ,S L 's. So I ~ J ~ Il l 'Z L 1 '. G o ,) if .. \. ~~ \ "'~ ' =Jl \:'1 \ :1~ \ ~ \ ~~ P'~ - DJ~...i. '!~ . ~:: III l4 C il. ;, ~ -9 () 1[1 ~t _6-... ,....... _)0. - ,. _.:: -- Exhibit C PROPOSED SITE PLAN "'-- -,.." ~'-c;.;z. ! , ~"~+ C.o...JO r....Jt.it ~ ~ " . .COUNCIL CHAMBERS 5755 COUNTRY CLUB 7:30 P.M. ROAD CITY OF SHOREWOOD PARK COMMISSION MEETING MONDAY, APRIL 2, 1984 M I NUT E S CALL TO ORDER Chairman Roger Stein called the meeting to order at 7:50 P.M. ROLL CALL Present: Chairman Roger Stein; Commissioners Gordon Lindstrom, Gary Carl, Con Schmid, Carol Butterfield, Marty Jakel, and Mari Kooi; Planner Brad Nielsen and Deputy Clerk Sue Niccum. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Lindstrom moved, Schmid seconded, to approve the minutes of March 19, 1984 as written. Motion carried unanimously. BMX TRACK Gary Carl introduced Mr. David Ronken of Northstar BMX to the Commission and informed them that Mr. Ronken will be taking over the BMX track for this year. Commissioner Schmid said he thought the SLMPSD Reserve was taking it over. Gary said that the Reserve was not interested this year. Commission asked how it would be run. Gary explained that there would only be four (4) races this year: Saturday, Saturday, Saturday, Saturday, May 19th June 3rd July 7th Aug. 4th 9:30 - 11:00 2:30 - 3:30 2:30 - 3:30 2:30 - 3:30 AM/Registration PM/Registration PM/Registration PM/Registration It will be run as a non-profit organization continuing under the title "Shorewood BMX". Mr. Ronkin will run it, Gary will work with him in an advisory position. The contract will be the same. The insurance will be improved, covering the track even on no race days, a time previously covered by the City of Shorewood. The track will be maintained during and between races by approximately five (5) people in return for free entry fees. Satellites will follow same pattern as last year. Commissioner Lindstrom brought up the noise factor and asked for clarification before it is approved by Park Commission and Council. He also objected to the method of a running commentary all through each race, giving all the names of the riders, etc., stating that they don't do this in other sports. Gary proposed a compromise: 1. Cutting down to one speaker. 2. Lowering the speaker. 3. Cutting down the volume. #-.( /a- ~.,6 . PA~MMISSION MINUTES MON"', APRIL 2, 1984 page two BMX Track, continued Mr. Ronken explained that unlike other sports, BMX racing is a new sport that deals on individual, rather than team effort. He said that the races move very fast, and this method of announcing is necessary for this sport. He said he would cooperate every way possible concerning the noise factor, but if they were not allowed to announce the kid's names, he felt it would detract from the excitement and would have to withdraw his offer. Con Schmid moved, Carol Butterfield seconded, to recommend to Council that David Ronken of Northstar BMX, with Gary Carl advising, be allowed to sign the regular BMX contract, contingent upon the agreement that if there are any complaints after the first race, the issue will be brought back before the Park Commission for review. Motion carried unanimously. FESTIVAL OF PARKS Gordon Lindstrom moved, Mari Kooi seconded, to recommend to Council to approve the amount of $700.00 for Festival of Parks expenses. Motion carried unanimously. SHOREWOOD OAKS Park Commission reviewed new design alternatives presented by Shorewood Oaks showing open space. Park Commission felt that, as they had stated before, due to the near proximity to Freeman Park, they do not require additional land and will not consider it as park dedication. Therefore, a full cash dedication to be used for the improvement of Freeman Park is requested. The Commission suggests that the open space could be provided as private open space to be owned and maintained by the homeowner's association. COVINGTON VINE RIDGE TRAIL Planner Nielsen presented a map showing the connecting trail system for the southeast area of Shorewood. The map covered the Covington Vine Ridge, Trivesco and Near Mountain projects, showing that the trails will connect nicely, running from Chanhassen all the way to Highway 7, also branching off to the observation platforms proposed by Near Mountain on Silver Lake. Surfacing of trails was discussed. Planner Nielsen said Near Mountain had proposed a hard surface bike trail. Covington Vine Ridge will have a 20 foot easement that will run through a wetlands area. Planner Nielsen suggested that the Commission walk the proposed trail area, giving them an idea of what type of surfacing will be feasible, and also to see what would be needed in the way of grading, considering the possibility of the developer doing the necessary grading. Commission also discussed the possibility of someday connecting a trail across Highway 7 to run up past Carmichaels to Manor Park, then connecting into trail to eventually connect with Thorpe. Crossing Highway 7 was discussed, possibly using the newly proposed intersection in the Broms Market area. . . PA~OMMISSION MINUTES MONDAY, APRIL 2, 1984 page three PROPOSED PARK - TRIVESCO Planner Brad Nielsen told Commission that he had talked to Mr. Wallace Dayton about the possibility of using his property as a park. Brad said Mr. Dayton liked the idea of having his land used as a park, but that he would expect to be paid for the land. Brad referred Mr. Steiner of Trivesco to Mr. Dayton. Planner Nielsen has talked to both Mr. Steiner and John Uban from Trivesco. They feel that they have extended themselves about as far as they can with the three parcels they've bought and would prefer to have the City purchase the property. Commissioner Carl stated that he felt the fewer people involved in dealing with Mr. Dayton at this time, the better it would be and suggested that the Park Commission keep out of it for the present and allow Planner Nielsen to deal with Mr. Dayton, as he has already met with him. Commission asked Planner Nielsen to find out: 1. What Mr. Dayton's land is worth and how much he wants for it. 2. If there is any chance of Trivesco buying it. 3. Approximately how much will there be in dedication fees from Trivesco, Covington Vine Ridge, and Near Mountain. 4. Would Mr. Dayton consider a Contract for Deed, and if so, for how long. After they receive this information the Commission will have a better idea of how to approach the situation, depending on the price and terms. Commission wondered, in terms of development fees, how fast things would progress. Planner Nielsen said he felt that two issues could spur development, 1) the intersection, and 2) water. Planner Nielsen said Mr. Dayton will be out of the country for about will write a letter to him so it will be there when he arrives home. run the issue through Council to get their permission to negotiate. a month. He He wants to PARK CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUNDS - FUND 41 Commission discussed five current funds and decided to reduce to three: 1. Miscellaneous Revenues (anything under $100.00) 2. Division Fees 3. Century Club (anything over $100.00) REPORTS Liaison Gary Carl reported that Council reaction was very favorable regarding Covington Vine Ridge, Trivesco and Near Mountain. Staff reported Christmas residents have donated $175.00 to Park Funds. ADJOURNMENT Marty Jakel moved, Con Schmid seconded, to adjourn at 9:43 P.M. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, Su(: n.i.rClJ,m Sue Niccum, Deputy Clerk CITY OF SHOREWOOD MAYOR Robert Rascop COUNCI L Jan Haugen Tad Shaw Kristi Stover Robert Gagne ADMINISTRATOR Doug Uhrhammer 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD . SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 . (612) 474-3236 MEMORANDUM TO: PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: BRAD NIELSEN DATE: 30 MARCH 1984 RE: SHOREWOOD OAKS - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT FILE NO.: 405 (84.03) At the 6 March Planning Commission meeting, Mr. Geoff Martin presented a proposal for a project called Shorewood Oaks. The presentation was part of the preapplication stage of a Comprehensive Plan amendment. Based upon input from Planning Commission members at the meeting, Mr. Martin has submitted two alternative designs for the project, both of which result in a lower density than originally proposed and both of which offer a small park within the project. The alternative designs, described in written and graphic form, are contained in the attached letter from Mr. Martin, dated 21 March 1984. It should be noted that when the applicant met with City staff, he was advised that due to the project's proximity to Freeman Park, the City would likely require a cash donation rather than land dedication for park purposes. It was felt that the City already had more than enough land in Freeman Park to serve the open space needs of the adjoining area as well as the entire community. The staff felt that what is needed is the money to develop the park. To require additional land, particularly so close to existing park space, would only delay the development of the existing facility. This position was upheld by the Park Commission when the applicant met with them. Since parks and open space proposals are subject to review and recommenda- tion by the Parks Commission, the new design alternatives are being referred to them on 2 April prior to the Planning Commission meeting the next evening. A Rp~;rlpnt;RI r.nmml/n;tv nn I RKP M;nnptnnkR'~ SmIth Shnrp Consultin Planners One Groveland Terrace Minnea oUs Minnesota 55403 612 377-3536 Howard Dahlgren Associates / Incorporated 21 Harch 1984 Honorable Mayor, Members of the City Council, Planning Commission and Staff CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, Minnesota 55331 Ladies and Gentlemen: On behalf of Shorewood Oaks Development, Inc. I would like to thank you for reviewing our proposal at the 6 Harch 1984 Planning Commission meeting. The general recommendations made by the Commissioners that evening are summarized below: 1. Create more open space; 2. Reduce density; 3. Introduce a pond; and 4. Incorporate a 50 foot right~of~way. In addition to the original development plan, two more alternative plans have been submitted for sketch plan review. With the exception of a pond, the two alternatives incorporate the recommendations of the Planning Commission and accomplish the main objective of the developer which is to create a high quality, marketable housing deyelopment. Development Plan A Plan A is the original development plan which was reviewed on 6 Harch. Development Plan B Plan B incorporates an internal open space with pathways connecting to Freeman Park. The internal park is situated to maximize tree preservation, and visual and pedestrian access from surrounding residents. The total number of lots has decreased from 135 as proposed in Development Plan A to 125 lots in Development Plan B. Honorable Mayor, Members of the City Council, Planning Commission and Staff CITY OF SHOREWOOD 21 March 1984 Page 2 Development Plan C In addition to the internal park as proposed in Plan B, townhouses have also been included in Plan C.. The townhouse clusters have been located to the east along Freeman Park ina manner which will minimize the impacts posed by the BMX Course and baseball fields to the east. Larger stands of trees and an increase in open space will also result from incorporating the townhouse clusters~ The overall number of dwelling units and gross density is the same as proposed in Plan B. If the City determines that an internal open space should be incorporated into the final plan, we believe this should be taken into consideration when determining park dedication responsibilities. The three alternative plans have been designed under the assumption that the City of Shorewood will adopt a policy of growth, and that policies regarding higher densities and city services will be established at the -7 April 1984 policy meeting. We look forward to arriving at a plan which meets both the objectives of the City and the developer in a timely and collaborative manner. . SHOREWOOD)OD OAKS ,. 'I! ' I I I I I Ii II I I I I .' ( "J! '-:~') I I / I.J / (/) J " .... " SHORE WOOD. MN. \N. 0'" DEVELOPER: SHOREWOOD OAKS DEVELOPMENT INC. PREPARED BY: ~~-~. ... ",...1i ~-_._.:.~ .....DiIh1jiii~'7ti:aio-.. ~ ~ NORTH ......:I...-M... ttw. A.,... ....,.,. __..., ...".,.AI~'" II. ..... ~.l""" DEVELDPMENT PLAN 'B' N 'C q..'f.: " /,,.o~~ < '?': ,," /' \>. / .,' v;>~"" ;' --~ \ n:".- ~:.-<; '::~..~) c.... \ 1.,/ I . : {{] lLJ II] '1 / J I / /1 pJ '" "pp_ fqr '7 I Ii -f II I 'I I, I I IV] : ill I ~ ![l' .. rt il,] ~ ,~~j [J __ I ffi_J D~J ,.._:':'~:':'~.ll2nd llLW'=:-::-==-'::::....../ ,,-, e. , e. Sit. Data Saaua..". . , .e 140.000.' .... A..., ..O.W., Op.. 'p..., .... A..., ...... '..U, L..., A".. L.. ...., .... D."..... .. ... 6.7' ..; : .... ... ..... a.. , I" .....0.. .... I.' .."'.. .... ".'.0.000.. a.' ..,.. a.6 d"'.O.OOO.' . ..... '10.000.' G.... D....... 'ec , 10.000.' . M... LOI ...., ........ ; , 10.000 .... ' fro.. lIO I.. .... .1 II. '..d. 10 ... ...... . '" . " ..d.' 7 I ...' ..p.' 10011. o U. I II. D II. .5 II. ,5 II. )011. ,; 0\..10. ........d' . co_p. pl.. _...d.... fro. 10. ....It'.. .'..1....... (a d.'..) '0 .... d...... . '..ld.....1 1'-6d,,'..) . . ...0.1.. fro. a-a '0 ..U.D. . ....Iop.... pl.. .pp.o".l . leDeae., taaU" \ \ ~._....,:,-~ January 23, 1984 The City of Shorewood City Council and Planning Commission RE: COVINGTON VINE RIDGE, A PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT Covington Vine Ridge is the name given an area of approximately 42 acres located on the Northwest corner of Covington Road and Vine Hill in Shorewood, Minnesota. The legal description is as follows: Commencing at a point in east line of southeast quarter of northeast quarter distance 243.39 feet north from southeast corner thereof thence west at right angles from said east line to a point of inter- section with west line of east 350.34 feet thereof and point of beginning thence continuing west along last described line to its intersection with west line of east 570.34 feet thereof thence south parallel with said east line to center line of town road thence north- westerly along said center line to its intersection with west line of southeast quarter of northeast quarter thence north to northwest corner thereof thence east to northeast corner thereof thence south to a point in east line thereof distance 384 feet north from southeast quarter thereof thence west at right angles from said east line 103 feet thence south parallel with east line distance 50 feet thence east at right angles to said east line thence south to center line of said town road thence northwesterly along said center line to its inter- section with southerly extension of said west line of east 350.34 feet of southeast quarter of northeast quarter thence north to beginning except roads. Unplatted in Section 36, Township 117, Range 23. The approximate 42 acres were owned by Agnes T. Sommer from 1947 until her death in 1973. The land then passed into the hands of her son, Robert F. Sommer. An inheritance of this type can be both a blessing and a severe liability. Robert Sommer is a man of modest means. Because of the substantial additional tax burden, he sought a way to develop the land City of Shorewood City Council and Planning Commission Covington Vine Ridge January 23, 1984 Page 2 in a suitable and tasteful way. In order to support that effort, he gained the assistance of his aunt, Sigfrid Sommer Canton, his cousins, Eric and Rolf Canton, and his friend Terry O'Sullivan. These individ- uals have simply sought to help Robert Sommer avoid losing the land because of an inability to pay the tax burden. None of these individ- uals is a professional developer. The guidance and involvement of a team of development professionals would be sought at an appropriate time. The land of Covington Vine Ridge is rolling, partly wooded, graced with rustic wetland, pleasant knolls, and a broad ridge that offers a variety of views. The preliminary development plan shows varied lot locations, shapes, and sizes to permit the most aesthetic treatment of the land. The Covington Vine Ridge Group has outlined the following goals: As spokesman for the Covington Vine Ridge Group, Eric P. Canton outlines these Development Goals: 1" Quality Single Family Homes. 2. An Affordable Land/Structure Package. 3. A Phased Development. 4. Home Construction Beginning in 1984. 5. Density to be concentrated "within." 6. Preservation of Woodland Buffers. 7. Preservation of Wetlands. 8. A Project Reflecting the Good Taste and Standards of Shorewood. City of Shorewood City Council and Planning Commission Covington Vine Ridge January 23. 1984 Page 3 In brief. the following points reflect the features of the Covington Vine Ridge plan: 1. Approximately 42 Acres. 2. 64 Lots (Minimum lot size is 10.000 square feet) 3. Gross Density prox. 1.5 Dwelling Units/Acre 4. Net Density (excluding public road rights of way and designated wetlands) 2.64 Dwelling Units/Acre on net land mass of prox. 24.2 Acres. WHAT IS THE COVINGTON VINE RIDGE GROUP'S REQUEST? We respectfully request a Comprehensive Plan Ammendment to allow for the greater density and smaller lots shown on our proposed plan. Our proposed Planned Unit Development for Covington Vine Ridge permits us to hold development costs per lot to a minimum. The reduced costs per lot permit the eventual homeowner to afford as much home as possible on aesthetically pleasing land. Thank you for your attention and consideration. encl: 1. Print of plat 2. Representative examples of the types of homes to be built. 3. Evidence of applicant control over subject property. City of Shorewood City Council and Planning Commission Covington Vine Ridge January 23, 1984 Page 4 PROFESSIONALS RENDERING ADVICE AND/OR SERVICE TO DATE: Title Research and Legal Opinion from Donna Hanbery, in the office of Curtin and Mahoney, P.A., 4150 Multifoods Towers, Minneapolis City Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55402. Market Development Guidance from Peter Pflaum, President, Lundgren Brothers Construction, Inc., 935 East Wayzata Boulevard, Wayzata, Minnesota, 55391. 473-1231 Land Planning, Engineering, and Surveying work and Plat Development Proposal drawings by Mr. Rick Sathre, Sathre-Bergquist, Inc., 935 East Wayzata Boulevard, Wayzata, Minnesota, 55391. 476-0848 Planned Unit Development Guidance by John Cunningham and John Quiter, Cunningham Architects, 2116 Second Avenue South, Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55402. 874-6580 ROBERT F. SO:HHER 6239 Chaska Road Excelsior, MN 55331 October 18, 1983 City of Shorewood, ~ RE: Property known as COVINGTON RIDGE Northwest Corner of Covington Road and Vine Hill Road, Shorewood, MK. To Whom It ~~y Concern: As title holder to the property noted above and legally described in our request for a Comprehens-ive Plan .AJnendment, I designate Eric P. Canton as representative of the Covington Ridge Group. The Covington Ridge Group is nede up of individuals who have come forward to help me retain this property inherited from ~ Mother until such time as a suitable and tasteful way to develop the land could be evolved. Members of the Covington Ridge Group include Sigfrid Sommer Canton, Eric P. Canton, Rolf J. Canton, and Terry O'Sullivan. As noted, Eric P. Canton is empowered to act as our representative. ~.:. ~~ours, i~~' -~-- I Robert F. Sommer COVINGTON VINE RIDGE COVENANTS FOR QUALITY A clearly avowed goal of the Covington Vine Ridge Group is the creation of modest, yet creatively designed shelters built on affordable land. The Group recognizes that certain stipulations will be met if this goal is to be reached. The builder or builders will be required to submit architectural renderings to an Architectural Design Review Board. The exterior materials list must be furnished so that a clear understanding of the quality of the materials exists prior to approval. The Covington Vine Ridge Architectural Design Review Board will retain the right to review all outside improvements covering additional buildings, fencing, landscaping, and the location of the house on the individual lot. All driveways must be blacktopped or better finished surfaces. No rock, gravel or other "unfinished" surface is acceptable. Affordability often requires that certain interior finishing be left to the homebuyer. Thus, lower levels may be incomplete in aesthetic finishes. The Architectural Design Review Committee will be comprised of three individuals appointed by the Covington Vine Ridge Group. One individual shall be appointed chairman, and that chairman shall be responsible for calling meetings at appropriate times to review data submitted. At least fourteen days before construction begins, the owner shall submit to the Board one complete set of plans and specifications (including, without limitation, full site plans, exterior colors, and materials). The Board agrees to review and approve or disapprove the plans and specifications in writing within fourteen days of receipt. The Board will require evidence of credit worthiness on the part of the builder in order to ensure completion of the project according to the specifications in a timely manner. Covington Vine Ridge Covenants For Quality Page 2 The Board's determinations concerning the plans and specifications shall be conclusive. If the board disapproves the builder and/or the plans and specifications, it shall state in writing the reasons for said disapproval and any deficiencies in the plans or specifications which may be ammended in order to obtain approval. No noxious or offensive trade or activity shall be carried on nor upon any lot, nor shall anything be done thereon which may be or become an annoyance or nuisance to the neighborhood. No structure of a temporary character, trailer, basement, tent, shack, garage, barn, or other outbuilding shall be used on any lot at any time as a residence either temporarily or permanently. No boat, trailer, or recreational vehicle may be stored on any lot unless completely enclosed in garage or accessory structure. No animals, livestock, or poultry of any kinds shall be raised, bred or kept on the property, except that dogs, cats and other household pets may be kept, provided that they are not kept, bred, or maintained for any commercial purposes. No more than two cats and/or dogs shall be kept by the owners of any lot at anyone time. No lot shall be used or maintained as a dumping ground for rubbish, except during construction of subdivision improvements and dwellings. Trash, garbage or other waster shall be kept except in sanitary containers. All incinerators or other equipment for storage or disposal of such material shall be kept in a clean and sanitary condition. No sign of any kind shall be displayed to the public view on any lot except as follows: A) Subdivision identifying entrance monuments may be installed by the Developer. B) During the initial construction and sales period of the subdivision the Developer may place such directional and subdivision advertising signs as are permitted by ordinance, and one sign no larger than 3 feet by 4 feet in size are permitted on lots having dwellings advertised as model homes. Covington Vine Ridge Covenants For Quality Page 2 The Board's determinations concerning the plans and specifications shall be conclusive. If the board disapproves the builder and/or the plans and specifications, it shall state in writing the reasons for said disapproval and any deficiencies in the plans or specifications which may be ammended in order to obtain approval. No noxious or offensive trade or activity shall be carried on nor upon any lot, nor shall anything be done thereon which may be or become an annoyance or nuisance to the neighborhood. No structure of a temporary character, trailer, basement, tent, shack, garage, barn, or other outbuilding shall be used on any lot at any time as a residence either temporarily or permanently. No boat, trailer, or recreational vehicle may be stored on any lot unless completely enclosed in garage or accessory structure. No animals, livestock, or poultry of any kinds shall be raised, bred or kept on the property, except that dogs, cats and other household pets may be kept, provided that they are not kept, bred, or maintained for any commercial purposes. No more than two cats and/or dogs shall be kept by the owners of any lot at anyone time. No lot shall be used or maintained as a dumping ground for rubbish, except during construction of subdivision improvements and dwellings. Trash, garbage or other waster shall be kept except in sanitary containers. All incinerators or other equipment for storage or disposal of such material shall be kept in a clean and sanitary condition. No sign of any kind shall be displayed to the public view on any lot except as follows: A) Subdivision identifying entrance monuments may be installed by the Developer. B) During the initial construction and sales period of the subdivision the Developer may place such directional and subdivision advertising signs as are permitted by ordinance, and one sign no larger than 3 feet by 4 feet in size are permitted on lots having dwellings advertised as model homes. Covington Vine Ridge Covenants For Quality Page 3 C) After the initial construction and sales period one sign of not more than 2.5 feet in size advertising the lot for sale is permitted. No sod, soil, sand or gravel shall be sold or removed from any lot, except for the purpose of excavating for the construction or alteration of a residence on said premises or appurtenances thereto, or for the proper grading thereof, or for landscaping, or for road improvement. The Covington Vine Ridge Group recognizes that additional information and a detailed registered Declaration Of Covenants, Conditions, Restrictions, and Reservations will be submitted for ultimate development approval. COVINGTON VINE RIDGE EVALUATION FOR TAX PURPOSES The existing taxes on the approximate 42 acres amount to $8,049.29 in 1983. If one assumes that 20% of that collected tax revenue flows to the City of Shorewood, the net revenues to Shorewood amount to $1,609.86. According to information gathered from the county, the Covington Vine Ridge Group's proposal for 64 lots would generate the following in tax revenues: the assumption is that the combined lot and structure value would average $90,000, and the tax would be $2,107.05. The net collected taxes after applying the $650.00 Homestead Credit would be $1,457.57. If all 64 homes were built in accordance with our proposals on this average cost and tax revenues basis the gross tax revenues would be $93,284.48. Shorewood's 20% share of those revenues would then be $18,656.90 per year on the 1983 basis. The Covington Vine Ridge Group sincerely believes that the affordable land/structure package proposed would permit the property to be built out in a period of two to three years. If present zoning is sustained, it is unlikely that the property will be developed at all because of the nature of the property and its relative lack of desireability for homes costing much more in a less dense environment. The Covington Vine Ridge Group's goal of tasteful yet affordable housing represents a clearly more predictable increase in tax revenues flowing to the City of Shorewood than is presently the case. PROVIDING WATER TO THE COVINGTON VINE RIDGE DEVELOPMENT The Covington Vine Ridge Group recognizes that several options exist to provide water to the proposed Planned Unit Development. The Group has no clear understanding at this time as to what is preferable, not only for the relatively modest sized development represented in this proposal, but for the larger surrounding area. Therefore, the Group chooses to submit the following four options, and it requests further guidance from the City of Shorewood as to the appropriate direction to take to furnish water to the residents of Covington Vine Ridge. 1. No central well, all wells would be private. 2. A small well and lateral system with the capacity of perhaps 250 gallons per minute that would be one half of a well doublet in effect, and would be used by this area only. There would be a future possibility of tying this system into a larger system for surrounding developments. This option would provide for a system that then could be a backup system for the surrounding area and the entire southeast corner of the City of Shorewood. 3. Laterals connecting our Covington Vine Ridge Development to the Minnetonka Water System. 4. The designing and building of a major system for the entire area with perhaps 1,000 gallon capacity or greater. This would have to be planned to allow the system to be turned over to the city and a timely payback to the developer. Case No. CITY OF SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA APPLICATION FORM ~ Comprehensive Plan Amendment C'lnditional Use Permit _Zoning District Amendment Vorionce _Text Amendment Subdivision _Plonned Unit Development Applicant ERIC P. CA....TON. 2495 \.JILLOW DRIVE. HAMEL. MN 55340 (Name) (Address) Home- 473-0607 B-425-l400 (P hone ) C>wner ROBERT F. SO~1ER. 6239 CHASKA ROAD. ROUTE 5, EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 (Name) (Address) (Phone) 474-8770 Property Location (Street Address and Legal Description): Northwest corner of Covington Road and Vine Hill Road. Shorewood. ~~ (legal descriotion attached) Description and/or Reason for Request (Cite Ordinance Sections): A Comprehensive Plan Ammendment is requested to permit increased density on the. above cited land in order to provide the most affordable homes possible and the most aesthetic and efficient use of this land. This proposal permits the largest potential living space per dwelling unit at targeted price ranges of $80,000 to $120,000. (See attached supporting documentation, site plan, representative home designs ~no propertv opscriotion) In signing this application, I hereby acknowledge that I hove read and fully understand the applicable provisions of the Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances and current administrative procedures. I further acknowledge the fee explanation as outl ined in the application procedures and hereby agree to pay all statements received from the City pertaining to additional application expense. ,O~ / ~<./~/"'~? (Signature of Applicant) ~ IPI,."cp. nttnrh ~'Ir\I"'\,","";"c. ,.J.................".........:,........ ........,J ....t........r\ Comprehensive Plan Amendment 3155 ERIC P. CANTON FEE lIC. C.535-234~7&-582 2495 WILLOW DR. 473-ai07 0 18 o'Z HAMEL, MN 55340 CTOBFR 19.1.L.- 17-41110 PAYTOTHI CITY OF SHOREWOOD ()tlOIIOf Two HUNDRED AND No/IDD s -~~~ D~-_~~ i l DOLLARS A f&M Marquene .allonal Ban} Mlnne.polll, Monnesoll 5!>4110 ",~vinl!.ton RiJige__ ; ,. ':Og WOOO1.8.: coo S S8 2811" ~/~~ HS5 Case No. CITY OF SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA APPLICATION FORM ~ Comprehensive Plan Amendment ~ Zoning District Amendment C""ditional Use Permit Vnrionce Text Amendment Subdivision -LPlanned Unit Development Applicant ERIC P. CANTON, (Nome) 2495 Willow Drive, Hamel MN (Address) 55340 473-0607 W-425-1400 (P hone) Owner Robert F. 50mme1;, 6.239 Chllska Road, Route 5, Excelsior, MN 55331 (Nome) (Address) (Phone) 474-877Q Property Location (Street Address and Legal Description): NW Conrer of Covington Road and Vine Hill Roadr Shorewoodr MN (Legal description submitted on October 18, 1983) Description and/or Reoson for Request (Cite Ordinance Sections): A Comprehensive Plan Arnrnendment permitting a Zoning District Arnrnendment and ulti~tely a planned Unite Resident Development is requested to peTmit inc1;eased density on the above cited land in order to provide the most ~f~ordable homes possible and the most aescnec~c ana ell1C1ent use ot the land, Ih1S proposal perm1ts the largest potential living space per dwe1lin unit at the targeted price ranges of $80,000 to $120,000. (Supporting dOCumentation, a sit plan, and representative home design and property descriotion have been suhmitted no Clrtnhpr lR, lqRi) In signing this application, I hereby acknowledge that I hove read and fully understand the opplicable provisions of the Zoning ond Subdivision Ordinonce, ond current administrative procedures. I further acknowledge the fee explanation os outlined in the application procedures and hereby agree to pay'all statements received from the City pertaining to additional applicotion expense. (S ignoture of Appl icant) (Date) IPI.....,'" ,......__..... __. ... ._ ~__ _~. .._.... · I ~I" ERIC:= CANT:N" ~ ~ ~ 21- 32~3 .-1 llC. C.53S-234-676-582 _' I ~ 2495 WillOW DR. 473-0607 ,/ 17-4/810 i ~ HAMEL. MN S5340 / .. 19 ~ I ~~~IT~.6~1 ~~. '-' ,'~(};"?.Q~;J I S .?I7('?~ :: .--:J vr- ?-./ ~ /J~ ' , ~~./VCr~~./,-I/ .~~~ ::uOllARS I ,: \' ._A!~~~~~~BiD) ,5~/L~ ,.1:09 l.OOOOl.81: 200 S 582811" j 2 2 j I .. """",',:~"'-_J"'-='__"''--''''-''''-''''- ...,-....- ..1. MET R 0 POL I TAN C 0 U N C I L 300 Metro Square Building, Saint paul, Minnesota 55101 INFORMATION SUBMISSION COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS This worksheet must be filled out and submitted to the Metropolitan council with a copy of each proposed comprehensive plan amendment. The purpose of this worksheet is to summarize the proposed change so that the Metropolitan Council will have enough information about contemplated plan amendments to determine whether it has an interest in reviewing the amendment in more detail. Please be as specific as possible: attach additional explanatory materials if necessary. I. GENERAL INFO~~TION A. Sponsoring governmental unit Name of local contact person Address 5755 CountrY' Club Road? Telephone 474"",3236 Shorewood, MN Brad Nipl!,:pTl Shorewood, MN 55311 B. Attach a copy of the proposed amendment, including a map showing the location of the proposed change, the current plan map, and the proposed plan map; indicate which section(s) of the original plan are now being amended. c. What is the official local status of the proposed ame ndme n t? Adopted by planning commission on Approved by governing body subject to Metropolitan Council review on D. summarize the reasons for the proposed that the City of Shorewood rermit increased question called Covington Vine Ridge in ordpr ~n p~nvinp ~~~ ~~~: :f~nrd able homes possible and the lIlost aesthetic ;mn pffir;pnt" l1C:~ nf tohl:> l,<>.nd a land/structure package 'in the price range of S80jOOQ tQ $120~OOO. provide a list of all local units and all urlscictions affected by the change (school districts, watershed dis- tricts, etc.) that have been sent copies of this worksheet and plan amendment and the dates copies were sent to them. The proposal targets E. II. LAND USE A. Describe the following, as appropriate: o Size of area in acres 42 o proposed type(s) of land use pmm o Number of_r~sident~a~ dwplling units 64 o proposed density 2.72 dwelling units/acre on net land 1IIaSS ot apprOx1mate~y l3.5 acres. o proposed square footage of commercial, industrial, or public buildings NA . B. population, Household and Employment Forecasts Would you expect the proposed amendment to result in changes to the population, household or employment forecasts for 1990, or for the five-year stages contained in the original plan, for those land parcels affected by the change? No/Not applicable. .J Yes/Not sure. changes: If yes, show below the expected 1990 Forecast Based on previous plan pop. Bsg. Empl. o Forecast Based on plan Amendment pop. Hsg. Empl. Year 160 Inter im Stage s 19 19= C. Changes to Timing and Staging of Urban Service Area Will the proposed amendment result in changes to the boundaries of the urban service area or to the timing and staging of development or of the urban service area? No/Not applicable. Yes. Be sure Section I contains a map of these changes, measurements of the land area involved, and designation of new timing and staging- D. Housing Will this change have an effect on the community's ability or intent to achieve the long-term goals for low- and moderate-cost and modest-cost housing opportunities contained in the original plan? No/Not applicable. JL Yes. Descr ibe effect '1'0 pPTmi to hompm..........'" n~ n"""T~ng jnQgaQ levels to select shelt"PT!,: of monp~~ :Inri ~n..." ea~ily m:li~to:li'npn C::,q":lr" ~n()tage, We estimate units size will vary from 900 to l~nO !':~':1TP fpPt" The ori~inal zoning on this land would reClui'rp fRT fplJPT nni'toc:: J:lto c::nh~tan.... tially higher prices and would render the land virtually undevelopable. III. IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM A. Official Controls Will the proposed amendment require a change to zoning, subdivision, or on-site sewer ordinances? No. Yes. Please describe. B. Capital Improvement Program Will the proposed amendment require a change to the CIP? No. Yes. Please describe. IV. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS (Optional) You may add comments stating your conclusions about the effects of the proposed amendment on metropolitan plans. This would be particularly appropriate in those instances where a metropolitan system plan is affected, but you feel that the change is minor or inconsequential. You may also use this statement to provide the Council with factors or considera- tions not covered elsewhere in the worksheet or that directly address the criteria the Council will use to make its initial determination. EP564l ~\~ o ...~ I .... I . . & ~ '\C' ( ~ tiJ~~lt~'~i~.{:'~::~S~J~::,~::~:::t:t:t~) \ \ > '''j ~ \ -',,- i I I I ! ! i I L lBHJ ,l ! ,I ii: ... "---. J..----J '" I~~ ' } I ~! ~,~ ~ _____.i ::=- ~ ."'" '...-~""~~",."-"'_-.'_-. __ _ ,.__J ~ ... . --...~..- .......U_yl._ _~.._____ ,.. . ...~_... -----.. "'---~I --~"___::':::.._:___..__~__... f~;!~f~i:~~~~':~I';,.:,i,l, -',:,.:,:l,. L, ;!"II"" il,'I--I'~: !\:.:~, f~i iil!,' t~'-.n.41 tti'.l;:"r,r:r-s..;~.. _ .' ....... .' I. ll-I _ ,-I. '~'! . '~,;...;jii..':"'J:-"1~i' ... , . . I' .~;;ii.J..!:..;.;...''::rr;..,~.~ ::'.-. ",j!' :::l-I-I-I-t-,~: I . .....,....T'-.,.....:1.-4i!""~!L. .. l'I--oI-<':'I:! :1', kll-.I-.i'":,, ~'I I ~tlIGll'lh':1-jill~~~~ [ -I.#I--V" 'II! ., If. ,. . -J I I L.'-0.~. "'--':H:~~{';i' t ~I- v.:.l.:::. I I if- _ __ _. . ~ ty}~UP~~I!i~i~~P1. ~." I'X, I ~: .~ ; ~ :~ ! i '.Ill!" . . l;~. -" ! =I~--;-":'~I::!ii" Iii I ~t ~SJ~\~'ctrl, !II I " .,."""""."",] I; I i~~..""..:::f..'initt:,t. ~ ;u~~.~r.;:~~ I i ~l%~~ '1I~11111,1~.1.1.11 :-:i ' t-,.;.;:'-.::'il..-~~':' ;j.... ~Jl; _._ 11'l."-~, "'q."r, "-', CI t 1:J ~, ,": Il 'q!'i:C'1!~"l:n:'l.:~ - ~:!'l!"::tc.::' ;=I'\..=~. ~. "'i.!&';"~~~-i=1,', b '~';:~-rC!.i ....... ,;..:=::=ri'j"U:~IJtt,',i:::~ 51' ",,,,,,,"II~-:~':f:;~ [] t;;-c= :1 ~r~~~JI,*'~$t~~ l;~ :: :1' !1~~1 . . _1 i~~~ili~ IJ,.. : i'i:X~"j'f~~~" ~~~~-~~t;.~~~l~~-~ - . 1..._ ,. \ ~ >- , 1 \. ~ .. . ,----1 -. . L& .I ~'.. ~.:, i - -- ilil :M . I I ~ \ I I .1 '"'---/ I I ! .. . F -- lIB CO) 0 III oP 'II) ;fb.. . I .0 z~: ~< ~lD .0 :::l! ~~ cN c_ ~~! o I u " 0 ~It "- '" '- . 0 NOJ.NV:> :>IYJ / YJ,."O& UfJ80Y :1I0J 0311Vd3Ud ~ r .~ 3NIA NOJ.~NIAO~ 'a'~'n' d A~VNlWI13Hd 'HO-Ilt " lltU 'NW 'ViVZ}.Y'" . '0"'1 YJ.YZAY'" J..Y) sel ileOlt:l NV'd .ONI 'lSlnO~H:t3S - 3~H1VS !.t . . . ,;- ~ . ~F , , . ., . II . ~ > It < ~-I iil~ ~I . Cl< t ~q f- g - ~~ ~ ~ cl: o.~c:i .. .. .. II) .Cl~ ~-.: lDlit- glt! "zu ~< II) 0 < t- 01'- t- N Q q , o t- W -- -Izt- II -Iwll) ~~~ ~BlI! o o Nt- W W IL - ll-= \ _ o! ew -I < U II) o ~ . 0 lI) lI)< ;~lI)~~ ()cell!<z ce to: ()ce N ;) N ('\j. . ...~~...... . ('\j lD 10 ' .. .. ('\j cell) .. ~2~;> ce ti<!:: w ~t-~ ~~~~~ eI) t- el) W o Z It Cl ~1 ~ I :; i z I I I ; I ---L______ __ J ___ _ _ _ --.J 8 L-__ J '--- I I I I _ _~__L_ _ I I 1 . _~j __J \ Q I ~ I \ : I :> I ~ I ) :z: \____~_ I i I I _~_ J_ z \ Q z c ... w J ' } / / ",.....,.-....-r----.I"".........,....~ rF r' '1 ... I; // If I 0 \1 ~\ r\ . \ \ , / \ ) /' / j --r--- ! .' . \ '\ .