052383 CC Reg AgP
.,
CITY OF
REGULAR
MONDAY,
SHOREWO.'
COUNCIL '. MEETING
MAY 23~ 1983
~..- . ~ '.. . . '.'
xf ... toi. ..".. .'
. -.., . H,,~..iJSC'OUNCIL.' AMBERS
57~5 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD
SHOREWOOD, MN 7:3Q PM
~
AGE N D A
CALL TO ORDER:
~----------
~ ::::g:.::
allegiance
Stover
Mayor Rascop
Haugen
Shaw'
Leonardo
~ ~~~~QY~~-Q!~~!~~!!~
A. Regular Council Meeting - May 9, 1983
[attachment #la]
B. Board of Review .Meeting - May 9, 1983
[attachment #lb]
C . Special Co u n c i 1M e e tin g -M a y 1 2, 1 983
B.
~ ~!~Q~!~Q-~~Q~!!~~~!~!~Q!Y!!!Q~-~!gQ!!!~
~Q~~!!Q~~ 6055 Lake Linden Drive
APPLICANT: Mr. Harold Johnsen
f~ '" [attachment #3a]
P. 0 f\.r\1l r'~ , [attachment #3b]
~v' LJUIIl [attachment #3c]
\~ ~~QQ-~~-=-~Q!~!~-~~~~!~Q~-~~!QQ~!!_!Q~-~Q~!~Q-Q~Q!~~~~!
~ AMENDMENT TO THE C-1 ZONING
DISTRICT7----------------~--
[attachment #4a-Proposed Agreement]
[attachment $4b-Staff Report]
Shw~ ~~
REGULAR COUNCIL ~TING
-2-
MAY 23, .3
cd
8:30 PM - PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR VARIANCE
-----------------------------------------------
~Q~~!!Q!~ 4540 Enchanted Point
APPLICANT: Robin Woehnker
[attachment #5a]
[attachment #5b]
8:45 PM - PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR VARIANCE
-----------------------------------------------
20645 Radisson Inn Road
Mr. Walter Teske
at
*(This request has been withdrawn since it was
a variance is not needed)
[Refer to agenda Item #4
of the Council Packet for
the May 9th Council Meeting]
\~ ~!~~~~-~~~~!y!~!Q!_~~g~~~!~
.~LOCATION' 19425 State Highway
" ---------
"~ APPLICANT: James Winstead
,<v
~,~~I~~~Q_~QQ~-~~~~Qy~~~
LOCATION: 5745 Echo Road
---------
APPLICANT: Robert Shaw
~ ~~!~~!!Q-~QQ~-~~~~QY~~~
11~ ~Q~~!!Q!~ 28100 Woodside Road
uLf APPLICANT: Wendell Ellis
~ ~"'!!~ N~QQ!!!!I ~~!"-!!_!!!~!~
~:~I~~::r:~~~:~~~
[attachment #8a]
#7 {Burger King)
1a) Tonka Babe Ruth
[attachment #12a]
1b) South Tonka Little League [attachment #12b]
. ,.
\
REGULAR COUNCIL M~ING
-3-
MA Y 23,.83
PARK COMMISSION REPORT continued
~ :~:::~::::-~::=:~~:::~::-~~: 1 d s c he d u 1 i ng
~!!!Q~~~r~~_~~~Q~!~
[attachment #12c]
A. Comments on Gas Franchise Resolution
B. Resolution.DenYing Variance Requ~~\.~/lt~
~tt ~a1ob dM)io~)['~/J13b]
.~ f;
~ ~~f!~~~~~~_~~!Q~!~ c ~
Approval of Liquor Licenses:
':: :::::::::t:e:::::: P::::::a:o:u::~U:::' for ~~~~~;
D. Release of tax forfeit property: [attachment #15d] I.
E. Meeting announcement
Ordinance ~tachment #16aJ
J:::f~
~~~
~
,,~ ~1~
~~~~
" 6'~ ~<'
~.~
F. Other Items
MAYOR'
Review of Proposed
B.
17)
COUNCIL'S REPORT:
A.
B.
18)
APPROVAL OF CLAIMS AND ADJOURNMENT:
/()~/
'Y!5
."'......
. .
"'.' W'
.' .:... "..~,,>, " 1~'
,r . '" . ""..'" ~..,
..,..
..--.'e
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING
MONDAY, MAY 9, 1983
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
5755COUNTRY CLUB ROAD
SHOREWOOD, MN 7:30 PM
M I NUT E S
CALL TO ORDER:
The regular meeting of the Shorewood City Council was called to
order by Mayor Rascop at 7:30 PM, Monday, May 9, 1983, in the
Council Chambers.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE AND PRAYER:
The meeting opened with the Pledge of Allegiance and a prayer.
ROLL CALL:
Present: Mayor Rascop, Councilmembers Leonardo, Haugen,
Stover and Shaw.
Staff: Attorney Larson, Engineer Norton, Planner
Nielsen, Administrator Uhrhammer and Clerk
Kennelly.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
April 25, 1983 - Regular Council Minutes - Moved by Leonardo,
seconded by Shaw, to approve the minutes as corrected. Motion
carried.
April 21, 1983 - Board of Review - Moved by Haugen, seconded
by Shaw, to approve the minutes as written. Motion carried.
MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR:
Minnewashta Church - Gary Reid was present to ask the Council
if they had determined whether they were willing to help
restore the church parking lot because of the use of it by the
Cathcart Park users. Council needed further information from
the staff before they could make a determination.
Drainage Problem - Glen Ames of 6145 Apple Road was present to
request the repair of a road culvert in his area. Superintendent
Zdrazil will check on this and report back to the Council with
what is needed to correct this problem.
SUBURBAN RATE AUTHORITY:
Haugen reported on the Suburban Rate Authority;rneetingot' April 20,
1983.
They reviewed various subjects:
1) Uniform Gas Franchise
2) Project costs in 1983 Budget for MWCC
I CJ--
e
e
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING
-2-
MONDAY, MAY 9, 1983
3) CSO Task Force
4) MWCC Conference
5) MCCC Charges shown on sewer billing
6) Funding SRA activities
7:45 - PUBLIC HEARING: FAYFIELD-6005 CHRISTMAS LAKE ROAD
RESOLUTION NO. 33-83
Garage square footage variance-
Mr. Fayfield was present to request the construction of a garage
attached to his house. He currently has a garage/barn a long
distance from his residence. Public portion of the hearing was
closed at 7:50 with no comments made.
Leonardo moved, seconded by Stover, to grant the variance as
requested. Motion carried unanimously by Roll Call vote.
(5 ayes)
REVIEW OF FALSE ALARM ORDINANCE:
Council reviewed a sample Ordinance requested by the police and
fire department. Ordinance provides for a permit required by
anyone who has had 3 false alarms, fee to go to the City.
Council will review again after a complete copy of the Ordinance
can be obtained.
8:00 - PUBLIC HEARING: REZONING - SHOREWOOD CONDOMINIUMS
Request to rezone from R-2 and C-3 to a P.U.D. located at
5620 County Road #19.
Mr. Scott Harri of Schoell & Madsen representing Mr. Adrian
Johnson of Tingewood, Inc. in a proposal to rezone to P.U.D.
to construct a 39 unit condominium to be built on the site
located at 5620 County Road #19, and to retain the S.E.
corner for commercial use of the existing home for office space.
The Council reviewed the proposed plans for location, drainage,
entrance, unit size and affect on neighboring properties.
Mr.. Joseph Finley, representing Mr. James Borchart of 5580
County Road #19, was present to express objections to the density
and location of this proposed condominium. He also felt that
this could create additional drainage problems and a de-valu-
ation of Mr. Borchart's property.
Concerns were also expressed by Donald Peterson of 3200
Interlachen Court, Bob Gagne of 24575 Glen Road, Woody Love of
Lake Fellowship Church, Ed Bergslein of 24785 Smithtown Road.
e
e
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING
-3-
MONDAY, MAY 9, 1983
These concerns were addressed by the Council and City Engineer.
Council will vote on this proposal at the May 23rd Council
meeting. Haugen urg~d the developers to consider an alteration
of the building location and driveway. Council would also like
a report from them on the cost effect of a reduction of units
to 33.
8:30 PM - PUBLIC HEARING - FLOYD LARSON - 26420 OAK RIDGE CIRCLE
Public Hearing was opened at 9:15 PM to hear a variance request
from ~lr. Larson to build an additional garage in excess of a
3 car garage space.
Council received public comment in opposition from Frank Kelly
representing Lee Laramie of 26370 Oak Ridge Circle.. He also
reminded the Council of the new state statue adopted placing
greater restrictions on the granting of variances and he requested
the application be turned down. Jim Reuter of 26320 Oak Ridge
Circle presented a petition signed by 17 affected residents in
opposition to the proposed garage. Mayor Rascop also read a
letter from George Wilson and Theodore Noble stating their
opposition.
Mr. Larson presented an earlier petition with 5 signatures in
approval. (4 of the signatures appear on the other petition)
Shaw moved, seconded by Leonardo, to direct the Attorney to draw
a Resolution of Denial and submit to Council on May 23rd for
acceptance. Motion carried unanimously by Roll Call vote.
SIMPLE DIVISION-SCHERBING
5e65 MINNETONKA DRIVE
RESOLUTION NO. 34-83
Mr. Duane Scherbing was present to request a simple division of
his property along the balance of the originally platted lines
of Lots 11 & 12 Block 1 Minnetonka Hills 2nd Addition.
Haugen moved, seconded by Leonardo, to approve the division as
requested subject to payment of any additionalcharges or fees.
Motion carried unanimously by Roll Call vote.
SIMPLE SUBDIVISION-DE MALIGNON-5935 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD
Mr. De !~alignon presented a request for simple division of
Lot 29, Auditors Subdivision #133 into 2 parcels.
Haugen moved approval of the division as requested. Mr.
De Malignon then requested a variation of this request but was
not sure where he wanted the division line located. Haugen
withdrew motion and asked Mr. DeMalignon to return with his
final request with an attached drawing, at a special meeting
on May 12th at 5:00 PM.
REGULAR COUNCI~ETING
-4-
MA~, 1983
SIGN APPROVAL - SULLIVAN CENTER - 24000 STATE HIGHWAY #7
Brad Nielsen presented a request for the Sullivan Center for
one free standing sign to list all building tenants and a
second sign on the building naming the building. Rascop
questioned the location of the free standing sign.
Rascop moved, seconded by Leonardo, to approve the sign permit
with the location of the sign to approved by the building
inspector. Motion carried unanimously.
ADMINSTRATIVE REPORTS
Request for CDBG Funds Year IX RESOLUTION NO. 35-83
Administrator Uhrhammer presented a Resolution from the
County to accept the City and include us in the Year IX
Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant
Funding.
Haugen moved, seconded by Shaw, to adopt the Resolution as
presented. Motion carried unanimously by Roll Call vote.
Request to hire temporary Road Department Help
Uhrhammer explained the need to hire a temporary employee
for the road department because of the absence of one employee
now on Workmens Compensation.
Rascop moved, seconded by Haugen, to approve the temporary
hiring of an additional person.
MAYOR'S REPORT:
Shade Tree Program Resolution
Mayor Rascop read a Resolution from the state requesting the
cities to continue the Shade Tree Program in their City.
Haugen moved, seconded by Leonardo, to write a letter not
accepting the Resolution and explaining that the Program is
too large a burden on the City tax payers. Motion carried.
COUNCIL REPORTS:
Light Rail Advisory Comittee
Haugen reported on the hiring of a consulting company to
review various proposed routes, cost effect, and environ-
mental impact on, improving the rail line.
Levy Limit Relief Bill
Haugen explained a proposed bill allowing a one-time relief
to the levy limitation law to enable cities in financial
shortages to generate revenue. Is the Council in support of
this bill? Council urged Haugen to continue lobbying in
support of this bill.
"
REGULAR COUNCI.ETIfiG
-5-
MAY _1983
APPROVAL OF CLAIMS AND ADJOURNMENT
Stover moved, seconded by Leonardo, to approve claims for
payment followed by adjournment at 10:40 PM. Motion carried
unanimously.
General Fund - [Account #00166]
Liquor Fund - [Account #00174]
Checks 27087 - 27152 = $227,739.27
Checks 9994 - 1055 $ 41,191.46
Respectfully Submitted
Mayor
Sandra L. Kennelly, Clerk
SLK: sn
..
e
GENERAL FUND
e
CLAIMS PAID AND APPROVED SINCE MAY 9, 1983
f~~f~_! !Q_~~Q~_~~!Q_______________
27087
27088
27089
27090
27091
27092
27093
27094
27095
27096
27097
27098
27099
27100
27101
27102
27103
27104
27105
27106
27107
27108
27109
27110
27111
27112
27113
27114
27115
27116
27117
27118
27119
27120
27121
27122
27123
27124
27125
27126
27127
27128
27129
27130
27131
27132
27133
27134
27135
27136
MN Benefit Ass'n.
Colonial Ins.
Central Life Grp. Ins.
Evelyn Beck
J. Foley
League MN Cities
MCFOA Treasurer
State Treasurer
State St. Bk.
Metro Waste
SLMPSD
SLMPSD
Quality Quick Printing
Metro Council
State Treasurer
Mun. & Priv. Sere
LMC Annual Conf.
Gary Larson
State Treasurer
Commissioner of Revenue
Assoc. Asphalt Inc.
Doug Uhrhammer
U. S. Postoffice
Evelyn Beck
Roberta Dybvik
Dennis Johnson
Sandra Kennelly
Sue Niccum
Brad Nielsen
Robert Quaas
Dan Randall
Kathy West
Don Zdrazil
Minnetonka State Bank
Earl F. Andersen & Assoc.
Astleford Equipment
Chaska Parts Service
Copy Duplicating
Country Signs
City of Deephaven
Dale Green Co.
Feed-rite Controls
NSP
Quality Office Products
Red Wing's Mobil
Savoie Supply
U.S. Postoffice
Shorewood Tree Service
Tonka Auto
Tonka Printing
PURPOSE AMOUNT
Dybvik-insurance
insurance
Insurance
Travel expenses
Board Meeting
MN Directories
Assoc. Dues
PERA
Sewer Sere Chgs.
May contract
March jail fees
May Newsletter
Meeting-Jan & Kristi
PERA
animal control
Rascop
April Legal
Soc Sec
April WH taxes
Road materials
salary
Newsletter postage
salary
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
May FWH taxes
Street Signs
parts-truck #1
parts and shop
Minolta Drum usage
City Hall Signs
Sewer Charges
Black dirt
Chlorine signs (3)
Electricity
Copy Supplies
tire repair-sweeper
vaccuum bags
postage
Elm-Grant-reimbursable
parts
office supplies
7. 00
119.50
1,606.06
73.22
3.00
40.00
15.00
742.72
112.02
15,776.31
18,750.00
22.44
103.45
14.00
841.55
405.00
96.00
2,701.60
2,224.91
1,175.00
107.82
705.71
144.15
538.01
399.24
506.71
490.62
316.28
583.06
551. 76
497.40
326.53
601.46
1,023.70
45.54
161.36
100.09
54.00
229.00
23.50
84.00
19.55
732.91
126.79
9.50
14.25
300.00
765.00
17.17
303.75
~ERAL FUND PAID SINCE MA4Ia, 1983
page 2
f~~f~_! !Q_~~Q~_K~!g_______________
27137
27138
27139
27140
27141
27142
27143
27144
27145
27146
27147
27148
27149
27150
27151
27152
Vessco Inc.
Wagers
True Value
Westside Equipment
Northwestern Nat'l.
State Treasurer
National City Bank
Doug Uhrhammer
Jan Haugen
Al Leonardo
Tad Shaw
Kristi Stover
Mayor Rascop
Ap~r;~d b;---~l...l
Shorewood Village Coancil,
.i-'
AMOUNT $ ___ .
_....~..~..'~_.'--~ ..........- -,.".-...... ---. _.~._._:.;..-.,,"'~.-~-
PURPOSE AMOUNT
Bk.
pumphouse services
aintenance agreement
upplies-
VOID
gas pump install.
bond payments
PERA
bonds
VOID
Craguns-conference
VOID
Council Salary
" "
j
a
1--- ----- ---- ----
L._- ---------- ---
1-- n__ ----------- - -----
I----~. .--
r 0" TE --------
" "
" "
Mayor salary
82.50
321. 88
106.38
-0-
633.92
165,048.00
819.34
5,425.00
-0-
134.61
-0-
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
150.00
$ 227,739.27
..
f!!~f~_1t
9994
9995
9996
9997
9998
9999
10000
1001
1002
1003
1004
1005
1006
1007
1008
1009
1010
1011
1012
1013
1014
1015
1016
1017
1018
1019
1020
1021
1022
1023
1024
1025
1026
1027
1028
1029
1030
1031
1032
1033
1034
1035
1036
1037
1038
1039
1040
1041
1042-
1043
1044
1045
1046
e e
LIQUOR FUND - BILLS PAID SINCE MAY 9, 1983
TO WHOM PAID
--------------------------
MN Benefit Ass'n.
Central Life Grp. Ins.
Ryan Properties
Harry Niemela
Old Peoria Co.
State Treasurer
Griggs Cooper
Eagle Wine
Johnson Bros
Twin City Wine
Johnson Bros
Ed Phillips
Quality Wine
Old Peoria
Minter Weisman
Minter Weisman
PQ & C Automation
Southtown Refrig.
State Treasurer
State Treasurer
Commisso of Revenue
Johnson Bros.
Twin City Wine
Intercontinental Pkg.
Griggs Cooper
Ed Phillips
Old Peoria
Day Distributing Co.
Mark VII Sales
Thorpe Distributing
Pepsi Cola
Royal Crown
G & K Services
Alarm Services
NSP
Vernon Co.
Harry Feightinger
Russ Marron
Don Tharalson
Steven Theis
Sue Culver
Pat Amundson
Pat Pfeffer
Mary Skraba
Mark Wilson
Dean Young
Minnetonka State Bk.
State Treasurer
Commissioner of Taxation
Griggs Cooper
Johnson Bros
Eagle Wine
~
PURPOSE
Feichtinger-May
may premo
Rent
May rent
Liquor
PERA
Liquor
Wine
Wine
Wine
Wine
Wine
Wine
Liquor
Cigarettes & candy
Misc.
Misc - ice
Cooler repair
PERA
Soc See
April SWH taxes
Wine
Wine
Wine
Liquor
Wine
Liquor
Beer & Misc.
Beer
Beer
pop
Pop
Laundry
April electricity
Advertising
salary
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
May FWH taxes
VOID
PERA
April Sales Tax
Liquor
Wine
Wine
AMOUNT
10.85
336.53
2,688.26
882.50
1,489.18
348.78
1,707.23
18.33
779.10
615.69
127.22
766.03
769.08
817.31
764.62
91.92
40.00
40.60
343.84
438.06
322.00
632.97
49.21
313.26
2,378.78
261.84
570.49
1,753.43
1 , 163 . 1 5
3,032.30
199.75
43.75
36.20
243.25
208.86
229.84
605.42
407.70
152.00
249.72
98.00
46.20
113.00
73.50
275.86
311.92
304.60
-0-
431. 84
3,282.38
2,211.52
595.19
197.10
..
e
LIQUOR FUND MAY e
PAGE 2
f~!f~_! !Q_~~Q~_~~!~_____________
1047
1048
1049
1050
1051
1052
1053
1054
1055
Twin City Wine
Ed Phillips
Old Peoria
Qua lit y<W i n e
East Side Bev.
A.J. Ocle
Minter Weisman
Coca Cola
Frito Lay
Approvedb~
ShorewoodVillage
AMOUNT
------'-_.~~-........-_..-'",._-,----"...-
--_._--.__..--~,----.~
PURPOSE AMOUNT
Wine
Wine and Liquor
Liquor and Wine
Wine
April beer
Beer and misc.
Cigarettes and misc.
April Pop
Misc. purchases
111.22
2,426.62
845.01
123.28
1,807.01
951.60
730.54
280.35
45.67
$ 41,191.46
-----------
-----------
CITY OF SHOREWOOD.
BOARD OF REVIEW
MONDAY, MAY 9, 1983
COUNCIL _MBERS
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD
6:30 PM
M I NUT E S
CALL TO ORDER:
The Shorewood City Council reconvened as the Shorewood Board
of Review at 6:34 PM on May 9th, 1983 in the Council Chambers
to review the assessed valuation placed on real estate
property in Shorewood.
ROLL CALL:
Present: Mayor Rascop, Councilmembers Leonardo, Stover,
Haugen and Shaw arriving at 7=37 PM.
Staff: County Assessor Milton Hilk and Clerk Kennelly
REQUESTS:
The following property owners returned to the Council for
review of their assessed valuation.
Roger Lindholm
20025 Vine Street
25-117-23-31-0024
The County Assessor inspecte~ this property and recommended
a reduction from 82,100 to 74,600 (26,400 Land-48,200 Bldgs.)
Haugen moved, seconded by Stover, to approve the recommend-
ationof the assessor for reduction to 74,600. Motion
carried unanimously.
David McCuskey
5250 Howards Point Road
County Assessor reviewed the~,. . rty, and recommended a
reduction from 267,000 to 26 ,.200 140,000 Land-122, 100
Bdlg.) JtyO
Haugen moved, seconded by Leonardo, to accept the assessor's
recommendation to reduce value to 262,100. Motion carried
unanimously.
30-117-23-44-0007
Janet Cradit
6040 Brand Circle
35-117-23-43-0008
County Assessor reviewed this property and felt that no
change in value should be made. Council temporarily
postponed actidn forCradit appearance. After no one
appeared, Council took no action.
ADJOURNMENT:
Moved by Rascop, seconded by Haugen, to adjourn the Shorewood
Board of Review at 6:53PM. Motion carried.
It
CITY OF SHOREWOOD .
SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING
THURSDAY, MAY 12, 1983
COUI:L CHAMBERS
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD
6:00 PM
M I NUT E S
CALL TO ORDER:
Mayor Rascop called the meeting to order at approximately 6:05 PM.
ROLL CALL:
Present: Mayor Rascop, Councilmembers Haugen, Shaw,
Stover and Leonardo
Staff: Planner Nielsen and Attorney Larson
SIMPLE SUBDIVISION - DE MALIGNON
RESOLUTION NO.~~~dr~
The Planner presented the proposed division submitted by Doug
De Malignon, creating two lots, each 1.07 acres in area.
Shaw moved, Haugen seconded, to approve the request for simple
subdivision subject to the applicant providing the City with
a 33 foot roadway easement along the western edge of the property,
provision of drainage and utility easements along all property
lines and payment of all fees and assessments against the property.
The motion carried unanimously, 5-0.
ADJOURNMENT:
Shaw moved, seconded by Stover, to adjourn. The motion carried
unanimously and the meeting was closed at 6:15 PM.
Respectfully submitted,
BRADLEY J. NIELSEN, Planner
BJN: sn
/L
e
e
. .
...
..
MEMORANDUM
e
e
CITY OF
SHOREWOOD
j..,.
MAYOR
Robert Rascop
COUNCIL
Jan Haugen
Tad Shaw
Alexander Leonardo
Robert Gagne
ADMINISTRATOR
Doug Uhrhammer
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD . SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 . (612) 474-3236
TO: PLANNING COMMISSION, MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: BRAD NIELSEN
DATE: 13 MAY 1983
RE: JOHNSON, HAROLD - REZONING AND SIMPLE SUBDIVISION
FILE NO.: 405 (83.14)
BACKGROUND
Mr. Harold Johnson has requested approval of a rezoning and lot split for his
property located at 6055 Lake Linden Drive (see Site Location map attached).
The property is currently zoned R-2 and is occupied by Mr. Johnson's home. He
has asked that the property be rezoned to R-4 in order to allow him to split
the parcel into two lots, the southernmost of which could be used for a two-
family dwelling (see Exhibit B, attached).
Surrounding land use and zoning are as follows:
north - undeveloped (Lake Linden), zoned R-2
east - single family, zoned R-2
south - undeveloped, zoned C-3
west - two-family dwelling and undeveloped, zoned R-2
According to the applicant's survey the property contains approximately 51,000
square feet. As shown on Exhibit C the site is on a hill overlooking Lake
Linden Drive.
~ ~:
A Residential Community/on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore
.
3a.-
e
e
PLANNING COMMISSION,
MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
13 MAY 1983
Page Two
ISSUES AND ANALYSIS
When Mr. Johnson originally came in with a proposal, it was to divide his prop-
erty into three lots, one of which would contain the existing house. To have
done so would have required variances for lot area for two of the lots. Upon
review of the division, the City Staff determined that in conjunction with any
division of the property in question, the City should require additional right-
of-way for the purpose of straightening Lake Linden Drive in the future. The
City Engineer determined how much area was needed to straighten the street and
establish safer sightlines. The r.o.w. acquisition reduced the area of the prop-
erty by 8000 sqare feet and increased the discrepancy between required and pro-
posed lot sizes.
Since it is not considered fair to the applicant to reduce the number of lots in
order to solve a City problem, it was suggested that he apply for R-4 zoning o~
the e.roperty. This would allow single family homes on 15,000 square foot lots
or a two family dwelling on a 20,000 square foot lot. Anything more than that
requires a minimum tract. of 2~ acres.
The trade-off being suggested resolves the City's problem while still allowing
the applicant three units. From a land use perspective, a two-family dwelling
fits quite well in the area. As noted in the Comprehensive Plan and the recent
Schmidt rezoning immediately across Lake Linden Drive, the area should be con-
sidered for transitional land uses between the commercial area south and east
to lower density residential neighborhoods to the north and west.
One additional item requested by the applicant is that the existing garage be-
hind the house be allowed to remain. In order to do so the new lot line would
have to be 25 feet south of the garage (the rear yard setback for the R-4
District).
RECOMMENDATION
Based upon the preceding analYSis, Mr. Johnson's request is considered reasonable
as well as being an opportunity to correct a potentially hazardous street. As
such it is recommended that the rezoning to R-4 be approved and the subdivision
allowed subject to the following:
1- The applicant should deed the required right-of-way to the City as
per the City Engineer's plan.
2. The southerly lot should be at least 20,000 square feet in area.
3. If the garage is to remain, the lot line between the two lots should
be located 25 feet south. of it.
4. The City should require .that access to the southerly lot be provided
as near to the southeast corner of the lot as possible.
BJN:kw
cc: Doug Uhrhammer~
Jim Norton
Gary Larson
Harold Johnson
o ,
~ '
c,'\ \0 ~ I:j "(?oj
o 14
.1 1\1)
\
.
~
"
....sl.~
;S~J-~
,'. '\; t'l:O ..
>. \ t ......
:I~)
'"'
10 ,
..
.-"
....
(1-0) :~
~ \: ...
.. .
.~
". i4
r
, . "l-?
:' ~\4)
~. '., ::d _
;
Ill:
2.1
'0 ;.::
~
.....
",
,.
.
...
'1:
.
\
'.\1'
...
I
...
.-
" .-,\ "
,. ',' ..'IS.,'
. S~l'"
.-
'; ... \>. 12 .
r, f. "
I , ,.,.
I ~
t
.:...6:1
/~\
I ,
" '
I' .
. ..:..
,. i' I 0
"
o
.~
_Or _ .
- 't..: .: .
~i -
-,')l.t ....~
'/
I-f)
'"
...
~\
Q)
~
~
t
t
, ,
\..
'69
170
''),.1 oJ
\. 1\
t..aort"
,
1". z..oo
.! ~ # ..-
~4., ~...
~
.~
112
.:~.
'.
.: ;...
tl1)
173
,I""
". . ...,
. J ' :. \....
? ~ J8
L
\' ..
.~
(66)
",
~.
":'"
03'
I)
'"
.
...
..$_J:
. -.... . 'I.'. ..
... -,-.
\\j\~
U~Q,
.
'J
...
~)
'63
.
"
~'10
,,4 f; ~ '__
-. l#r~ /I'
...., '., (
., .,. ;.:.
... . ". I
. t. ~i.,o. ~
..5 ~,-.
1-"
,.
I
I ~)
I '
I '.
't
I
I
:l \.
'it ""'1,,'0. 'f
b ',~' ,"k
:. "I.;.~'
,t ,0 'or
~ It~ .
)~ .~.'..
.~ '..,.7
.
x
, ""'-:'r:' (,i;.
".
Exhibit A
SITE LOCATION
Johnson Rezoning and
Simple Subdivision
,-
/'
174 f...\
\
. ..
'.
\
\
e
e
,
/
./
,
I
/
'.
'\
\
\
".
tJ
Prot~a...&
0\ \/,"\0 Y\.
Exhibit B
PROPOSED DIVISION
. - cti
~I
., .
, .-
.,
e.
.
......
~
~
{
.;.
L
IQ
,..
~
~
..
(e
(.~
.
~'<)
:( }(~;lYJ
ORR .SCHELEN. MAYERON & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Consulting Engineers
Land Surveyors
February 28, 1983
City of Shorewood
5755 Country Club Road
Shorewood, MN 55331
Attn: Mr. Doug Uhrhammer
City Administrator
Re: Lake Linden Drive "Re-Alignment"
Dear Mr. Uhrhammer:
Attached is a plan and cross-section of the proposed Lake Linden Drive
Re-Alignment. With a 210 curve, the proposed roadway location will
assume a flatter curve with the proper sight distance for a 30 mile
per hour speed limit.
The cross-section shows a proposed street width of 24 feet. This is
to match the current street width of 22 feet. In the future, however,
the classification of this street should be reviewed. If it's going
to provide a collector status function, it should be designed as a
collector street throughout its entire length.
Approximately 8,000 square feet of additional right-of-way is required
to accomplish the proposed re-alignment as shown. While the actual
work on the street may not be done immediately, the right-of-way
should be acquired when the adjacent property is sub-divided.
If you have any questions, please contact me.
Respectfully,
ORR-SCHELEN-MAYERON
& ASSOCIATES, INC.
~ P.l/~
James P. Norton, P.E.
JPN:nlb
l
j<
Enclosure
36
,n" F;J<:t Hpnnpnin AvpnllP . .r::llifp ':~R . AAinnp~nnli~ Mfinnp<:nf1J t:;t:;41 ~ . 101" ~~1_ RfilOn
r- (e
MARIL YNWOOD
OUTLOT
c
OUTLOT 0
6 5
4
140':t
147';l
'"0
N
OUTLOT
8
o
N
~
EXISTING fQ\O AS TRAlELED
PROPOSED NEW R/W
, SCHM tOr'
1lJEZ000NG )
o
.
* 30,000 F1 t.
PR<POSED
LOT DtvtStON
UNE
~
---~
r~- -
r <..
~ <" .,. (t'
4It,
lEG E NO
NOTE:
DEGREE OF CURVE = 21-
FOR 30 III P. H.
.0'
.0'
r,
o-N ~
leAL! ~I.. '$)'
t:::::=::~
l'~":.
, ,
ADOL. R/. ~QD,
* 1tIEA IA5ED ON NEW RIW lINE
_..----:.; _,u
N.
fIROPOSED ~ ALDMlIT
M.R.M. 2/23/83 1744
~ ORR BCHELES MAYERON
~ . A88OClATI!:8.INC.
-.,.. _ .' tal' -_"... . ...1I 2W
UIII-.- __US_SOll.wu. .u'u;_
~ "..tStOIt (:JI It lODE COIIIul. TANTS Me,
--------.
'"
, SCHOREWOOD,\ MINNESOTA
'-.
o....i.. Title
s..... Me
Dr... .,; hte: C.... ....
LAKE LINDEN DRIVE
· RE-ALIGNMENT ·
I
.
...
e
.
SHOREWOOO ,
PROPOSED
STREET
l
60'
t \tWES
(_
MINNESOTA
.rEAST R/W
SLOPE
EASEMENT
LIE:
30'
I
I
I,rEXISTlNG ..
~ 12' + 12' 4
I
I II4'YFT. (MIN.)
NOTEI
l. .. = PROPERTY l tHE
SHEET 2 IS DR~ AT A
Z. DIFFERENT SCALE THAN SHEET 1
3. rt/W: RtGHT ~ WAY
SECTION A - A
SCALE I I"a 20'
Dr... ", """-"'^-
, T l 'ORR' BCHELEN MAYERON
. ASSOCIATES. INC.
"11 Ull "'..I~I. 0, . IUl11 III
.'..1A~01l1 .'''.UOIA ~'.'l. 1'7' n' ....
"."_ "" ..DC co.sIlI.U.TI. ,lI(
IMtt'
-.- --
-~-
\J...AJ
2/231
URBAN SECT~
THROUGH CUT AREA tNO DITCH)
Dtowi", Title
CROSS SECTION
LAKE LINDEN DRIVE
· RE-ALIGNMENT ..
COfftIll ....
1744
Sh..t ...
2
..
e
e
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
TUESDAY, MAY 17, 1983
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD
7:30 P.M.
M 1 NUT E S
CALL TO ORDER
DRAFT
Chairman Benson called the May 17th Planning Commission meeting to order at 7:35 P.M.
ROLL CALL
Present: Commissioners Bob Shaw, Bruce Benson, Frank Reese, Janet Lesl ie (late),
Richard Spellman, Mary Boyd; Council Liaison Tad Shaw; Planner Brad
Nielsen; Secretary Kathy West.
Absent: Commissioner Vern Watten.
APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES
April 19, 1983: Boyd moved, Spellman seconded, to approve the minutes as written.
The motion carried unanimously, 5-0.
(Leslie arrived)
May 3, 1983: A typographical error was noted in paragraph three, page one, under
SIMPLE SUBDIVISION - DeMALIGNON. Shaw moved, Benson seconded, to
approve the minutes as corrected. The motion carried unanimously,
6-0.
PUBLIC HEARING - JOHNSEN REZONING REQUEST, SIMPLE SUBDIVISION - 6055 LAKE LINDEN DR.
Chairman Benson called the public hearing to order at 7:44 p.m. by reading the legal
notice as published May 4, 1983. Harold Johnsen was present. Planner Nielsen ex-
plained the request to rezone and split property located at 6055 Lake Linden Drive
(see Planner's report, attachment #1; Engineer's Report, Attachment #2). It was
noted that Johnsen had first requested to split the 51,000 square foot parcel into
three lots,~with the existing house and two small lots to the south, requiring a
variance. In reviewing the request the City Staff suggested that additional road
right-of-way be acquired along Lake Linden Drive to straighten the road. As a re-
sult of this Mr. Johnsen decided to split the parcel into two lots, one with the
existing house and the second with 21,000 square feet. Johnsen could have requested
R-3 zoning to allow construction of a double, but because of the r.o.w. acquisition,
the Staff noted that the size of the south lot would have been too small fora double
and suggested R-4 zoning. Nielsen noted that there was some flexibility as to the
location of the dividing line. Under the proposed zoning the required setback from
the existing garage would be 25 feet. It was noted that the proposed rezoning was
considered appropriate from a land use perspective given the surrounding land uses.
Mr. Johnsen questioned the 3:1 slope easement along the r.o.w. as outlined in the
Engineer's report. He expressed concern that the existing tree buffer would be
removed. It was noted that the slope was necessary for proper sight lines but Mr.
Johnsen would be allowed to replant on the easement. A question as to whether it
would be possible to save some of the trees was raised.
Commissioner Shaw questioned the access/egress point for the south lot. It was sug-
gested that this be via the cross street and not directly onto Lake Linden Drive.
Johnsen added that a driveway already exists.
3L
~
e
e
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
MAY 17, 1983
PAGE TWO
Commissioner Reese questioned whether the setback restrictions on the south lot
would allow building. It was noted that the R-4 requirements were less restrictive
in terms of setbacks. Reese also suggested that some of the trees along the road
might be saved by constructing retaining walls.
There being no further comments from the public, the hearing was closed at 7:35 p.m.
Reese moved, Leslie seconded, to recommend to the Council approval of the rezoning
as requested. The motion carried unanimously, 6-0.
Reese moved, Spellman seconded, to recommend to the Council approval of the simple
subdivision with the following suggestions:
1) That the division occur as close to 25 feet south of the garage as
possible in order to make the south lot as large as possible.
2) That future work on Lake Linden Drive take into consideration the use
of some type of retaining walls to minimize the loss of trees on the
lots in question.
3) That the additional right-of-way be platted at this time for future
road improvements.
The motion carried unanimously, 6-0.
e
e
e
e
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 77 IN THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD
An ordinance amending Ordinance No. 77 in the City of
Shorewood, being an ordinance for the purpose of promoting the
health, safety, order, convenience, prosperity, general
welfare, by regulation of the use of land, location, area,
size, use, and height of buildings on lots in the density of
population in the Village of Shorewood, Minnesota.
City Council of the City of Shorewood does ordain:
Section 1. Ordinance No. 17, Section 4, Subd. 6,
shall be amended by adding the following definition:
"SELF-STORAGE FACILITY. Any facility that is
designed and used for the purpose of renting or leasing an
individual storage space within the facili~y for the purpose of
storage only. Such facilities are different from public
warehouses in that public has access to their storage space
owned for the purpose of storing and removing personal
property and the owner does not issue a warehouse receipt, bill
of lading, or other document of title, for the personal
property stored in the storage space."
Section 2. That Ordinance No. 77, Section 23, Subd.
2, be amended by deleting B in its entirety.
Section 3. That Ordinance No. 77, Section 23, Subd.
3B, be amended to read as follows:
"B. Self-Storage Facility as defined in this
Ordinance provided that:
1. The property is screened and landscaped in
accordance with a landscape plan approved by the City Council.
2. The entire facility is located within a
complete enclosure. Such enclosure shall conform to applicable
City codes and ordinances."
-iI.. L/ t:L-
e
e
"3. The access to the facility shall be by a
security gate.
4. The hours of operation shall be limited to 7
a.m. to 10 p.m., Sunday through Thursday, and 7 a.m. to 12
midnight, Friday and Saturday.
5. The lighting shall be hooded and so~' cted
so that it is not visible from the public right-of-way 0 any
abutting residential district.
6. The structures shall conform to height
restrictions of the C-l District. In addition, all structures
within 50 feet of any property line shall be limited to one
story or 15 feet, whichever is less.
7. The storage is confined to enclosed
permanent structures.
8. The use of all structures shall be limited
to storage only. No retail service businesses or workshops
shall be allowed. Each facility shall have one residential
dwelling unit to be used only by a resident, caretaker, or
manager.
10. The entire area, other than occupied by the
buildings or plantings, shall be surfaced with material which
will control dust and drainage and is subject to the approval
of the City Engineer.
11. The number of off-street parking spaces
shall not be less than six. No on-street parking shall be
allowed.
12. Loading areas shall be located entirely
within the site which will be designed so as not to require
backing in from a public street.
13. The applicants shall provide a performance
bond or letter of credit to assure completion of the facility
in accordance with the plans and specifications approved by the
City Council. The amount of the bond shall be established by
the City Council at the recommendation of the City staff."
e
e
Section 4. This Ordinance shall be effective from
and after the passage and publication.
THIS
ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD
DAY OF , 1983.
Robert Rascop, Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
..
e
e
MAYOR
Robert Rascop
COUNCIL
Jan Haugen
Tad Shaw
Alexander Leonardo
Kristi Stover
ADMINISTRATOR
Doug Uhrhammer
CITY OF
SHOREWOOD
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD . SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 . (612) 474-3236
MEMORANDUM
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: BRAD NIELSEN/DOUG UHRHAMMER
DATE: 19 MAY 1983
RE: LAND USE - HIGHWAY 7
FILE NO.: 405 (83.02)
INTRODUCTION
In the preparation of Shorewood's Comprehensive Plan and more recently in the
review of a proposal by Tex-Sota Construction, the City has come to realize
that the current zoning along portions of State Highway 7 may not be appro-
priate.
In conjuction with the Tex-Sota request, the Council has requested that staff
prepare an analysis of various land uses which could occur along the highway
corridor and specifically on the Mortenson property. Bear in mind that this
report is far from exhaustive. However, to do more would require a formal
"land use marketability study" which would take considerable time, effort
and money to prepare.
For lack of a better approach we suggest that the land use study be done by
applying uses within our current zoning districts to the property in question,
examining ~ow the types of uses would fit the property. While some of the com-
ments contained herein apply specifically to the subject site, others also per-
tain to other areas along Highway 7. Since many of the zoning districts are quite
similar in nature, varying mainly in degree of intensity, we have grouped them
to reduce repetition.
R-1, R-2 and R-3 DISTRICTS
These are residential districts allowing primarily single and two-family homes.
The a9verse impacts associated with Highway 7 are only accentuated for this
type of development. The greatest problem is noise. The existing grade of the
highway and proximity to an intersection result in noise levels which exceed
standards used by lenders for home loans. Visual impact from the highway is
A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore
L(-b
e
e
Mayor and City Council
19 May 1983
Page Two
also considered detrimental to low density residential development. While
both visual and noise aspects can be somewhat mitigated by landscaping and
design, the Mortenson property is considered too shallow to effectively
screen out the highway.
In addition to residential development, churches and parks are allowed in
the R-1 through R-3 Districts. Proximity to the highway may work in favor
of a church, but the desirability of parks near highways is questionable.
It must also be realized that the area can only support so many churches
and parks, especially considering the proposed low density of the community.
All of the above affects the marketability of the property. Even if someone
could provide his own financing to build single or two-family homes on the
site, the cost of such housing would have to be so low to entice buyers to
purchase a house on the highway that the quality of the housing would have
to be a concern.
It is not the City's job to ensure that a landowner makes money on his prop-
erty. In regulating land use, however, the City should attempt to allow
reasonable return. To do otherwise typically results in disinvestment and
deterioration as is somewhat evidenced by the Mortenson property.
R-4 and R-5 DISTRICTS
These districts allow higher density residential development in the form of
townhouses and multiple family dwellings. Such development is considered ap-
propriate for Highway 7 for a number of reasons. First, the increased density
undoubtedly enhances the potential for investment. Discussions with developers
indicate that the market for such housing is excellent due to the existing
short supply. As mentioned in the Comprehensive Plan there is a need in the
community for affordable starter homes, and housing for "empty nesters" and
the elderly. In many cases the adverse impact of the highway can be overlooked
by residents because their tenancy may be limited to a few years (e.g. a young
family building equity in a townhome until they're able to afford a larger
home). Oftentimes multiple family construction and design can mitigate noise
and visual impact. These conclusions are supported by the projects currently
being developed along other areas of Highway 7. Finally, as noted in the Com-
prehensive Plan, higher density development should be located near major traf-
fic carriers and service facilities, not as a buffer, but simply to prevent
traffic from penetrating lower density areas.
While this type of development may be suitable for portions of Highway 7, the
suitability of the Mortenson property is questionable. The size of the site,
paricularly the depth, may not be adequate to provide bllffer areas along the
south and west boundaries for ~he protection of the existing neighborhood, and
a buffer area along the highway for protection of the site itself.
R-C DISTRICT
The permitted uses in this district, single and two-family residential, have
already been discussed. Nurseries and offices are allowed by conditional use
permit. While either of these could serve as transitional land use, it should
.
e
e
Mayor and City Council
19 May 1983
Page Three
be noted that nurseries are often developed as interim uses, with little
initial investment and anticipation that some other use will be proposed
when the time is right. Site size, combined with setback requirements, may
make an office layout difficult.
As a commercial district the R-C was the first one considered for the self-
storage proposal. In order to accommodate the request, not only would the
use have to be included, but size and lot coverage requirements would have
to be changed. It was felt that this may possibly result in intensifying
the district and was therefore eliminated from further consideration.
C-1, C-2, AND C-3 DISTRICTS
When evaluating certain parcels of land from the standpoint of anticipating
the type of future growth that may occur on the parcels, two axioms must be
be kept in mind. They are:
1) A new development (Residential or Commercial) is most likely to have
it's greatest effect on the value of real property located close to
the project. For example, an intense commercial or residential
development that locates next to an existing low density residential
area may have the negative impact of depressing the property values of
the low density residential area, while increasing the value of adjacent
undeveloped land.
2) As pointed out earlier, nonresidential property and high density
residential property values are more sensitive to differences in
accessibility than are low density residential housing values. For
example, land zoned for commercial or high density residential use
is extremely valuable if located near intersections of major road
networks or in relatively urbanized areas. The existance of physical
charactistics such as major intersections or existing commercial
properties tends to decrease the usefulness of adjacent undeveloped
property for low density residential development.
The problems associated with traffic (noise, lights, etc.) as a result of
physical characteristics already exist in the area under exanination. It
seems reasonable to assume that the existing problems combined with the
existing low density residential zoning on the Mortensen property has
already created disinvestment and deteriorization on the Mortensen property,
and has in effect depressed the attractiveness of the adjacent low density
residential property to the south of Mortensen's.
In order to m1n1m1ze future negative impacts in the area under evaluation,
it may be prudent to address a rezoning of the Mortensen property that will
help stimulate the following:
1) Proper, well designed development of the property (investment-not
disinvestment).
2) Investment that will m1n1m1ze and help alleviate the already existing
negative amenities that are affecting the residential properties to the
immediate south.
.
e
e
Mayor and City Council
10 May 1983
Page Four
The staff recommended a C-1 zoning district for the Mortensen property because
it is the least intense zoning district that would accommodate the proposed
development, while stimulating a type of investment that would accomplish
the goal of minimizing future negative impacts on adjacent residential property.
From the public hearing held on the proposed development, the adjoining
neighbors, consciously or unconsciously, seemed to agree with this line of
thought.
C-4 DISTRICT
Although the proposed self-storage facility could fit quite nicely into the
C-4 District, the acceptability of the C-4 District for the Mortensen property
may be questionable. This is not to say that C-4 development shouldn't be
located on Highway 7, however, such development would work much better and
efficiently if located among other commercial activities. In that way,
potential for adverse impact on surrounding residences is eliminated and the
development can devote more of its property to the actual use than to buffering.
P.U.D. DISTRICT
Regardless of which district is considered there is always a question as to
what could happen OD the site if the zoning is approved and then the developer
backs out. The only district in which this need not be a concern is the
Planned Unit Development District. The reason is simple. If the project is
not completed as approved by the City, the zoning reverts back to what it
previously was.
The P.U.D. District was the first zoning the staff considered when the self-
storage facility was proposed. The relative uniqueness of the proposal,
the multiple structures and the mixture of commercial and residential activity
were one of the ways in which the P.U.D. District was originally intended to
be used.
Unfortunately, when the City finally approved the P.U.D. ordinance, they
included a 20 acre minimum site size where mixtures of use were involved.
Considering the political atmosphere at the time, the action was under-
standable. From a planning perspective, however, it was somewhat shortsighted.
It is hoped that the fear of having commercial development occur just anywhere
in the community through use of P.U.D. has been dispelled. The IXI proposal
demonstrated that even though the site met the ~O acre minimum it could still
be denied based upon the City's Comprehensive Plan.
CONCLUSION
Assuming the proposed project is desirable, or at least acceptable, the use
could be included in any of the commercial districts, the least intense of
which is the C-1 District. Short of amending the P.U.D. District to eliminate
the 20 acre minimum, this remains the staff recommendation.
cc: Gary Larson, Jim Norton, Planning Commission, Bruce Hubbard, Kathy West
e
e
..,..
.
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
FILE NO.:
e
e
MAYOR
Robert Rascop
COUNCIL
Jan Haugen
Tad Shaw
Alexander Leonardo
Kristi Stover
ADMINISTRATOR
Doug Uhrhammer
CITY OF
SHOREWOOD
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD . SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 . (612) 474-3236
MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
BRAD NIELSEN
19 APRIL 1983
WOEHNKER, ROBIN - SWIMMING POOL VARIANCE
405 (83.16)
Robin Woehnker, 4540 Enchanted Point, has requested a setback variance to construct
a swimming pool approximately 24 feet from the shoreline of Lake Minnetonka
(Zoning Ordinance requires 50'). The following is a summary of site data
and pertinent zoning provisions relative to this request:
Site Data:
Lot is approximately 90' wide by 103' deep - 9720 square feet in area.
Current zoning, R-1 (requires 40,000 square foot lot).
Existing house is 60' from the lakeshore.
Zoning Ordinance Provisions:
Sect. 11, Subd. 7: No structure of any kind allowed
Ordinary High Watermark - may be reduced to 35' with
City Council.
Sect. 4, Subd. 6: Definition of structure- "Anything constructed or
erected, the use of which requires more or less permanent location on
on the ground, or attached to something having a permanent location
on the ground."
Sect. 6, Subd. 2: Conditions/Criteria for variances
Property can't yield a reasonable return if held to zoning
requirements.
A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore
~4-
r
e
e
MEMORANDUM
WOEHNKER - SWIMMING POOL
page 2
~ondition~/~rt~eria for variances continued
Unique circumstances
Variances won't alter the essential character of the locality.
Sect. 6, Subd. 2: Applicant must demonstrate hardship.
BN:sn
cc: Doug Uhrhammer
Gary Larson
Jim Norton
Robin Woehnker
William Parenteau
/'
/
{~)\.I
,. "",
. ' . '.....w ::
"
{/ - :';
~
.
, .,
" .
/1
/
,/
~"',~
,,,. .
'- I
,. ,
.... -.....
~"
',/
/
~
... :.,
,....
L.
.~ ..~., .
':."
'"
~
".;,"
I'
.'
. ~.,!.
:~ ,
~.
..... "'-.,
" --X
U
"
~
..
.? ,.
i
.. . ,
,
------..-..
/
'1"
,~
~'''~~~ .~~
~~\
~".
-'h_(..J \'':
~
"<
r'":',
. .
~.
r'
I
Exhibit C OL LOCATION
PROPOSED PO
,., ,
.
..i
~~
r'<~'
~.
(
,j
;~
\':'\
~
c
I e
e
.ili.
I
~~
~::r
t;!&
t"" 1-"
c+ .'
CD
~tJj
~
t-<
t~&
ItJ QA9J110t41 II C' \co.
/J'............. '.
~
(Y
, .
~
\
\
I
I
930.5
.
ENCH NTED
ISLAND
~
i
6
E
~
"
~~.
6-
>
-z
-
~
<-z
;-
~
-.~
o
z
'"
II:
t
,
/
'Q
~
'"
~. ..,.q.
'00
.~
) \
Exhibit A
'ITE LOCATION
~oehnker Variance
Request
e
~--
->
o
(!)e
'6"16/1
...J..
.... SI~" l6'l......
e
.
COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
TO:
THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM:
THE SHOREWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION
MEETING DATE:
TUESDAY, MAY 17, 1983
RE:
Request for a variance to construct a swimming pool within
50 feet of the lakeshore (Robin Woenker - 4540 Enchanted Pt.)
MOTION:
To recommend that the Council deny the request.
MOVED:
Frank Reese
SECONDED:
Janet Leslie
VOTE:
Unanimous, 6-0
AYES:
Bob Shaw, Bruce Benson, Frank Reese, Janet Leslie, Richard
Spellman, Mary Boyd
NAYS:
none
ABSTAIN:
none
The Commission noted that no hardship was demonstrated.
s-t
e
e
e
SHOREWOOD
MEMO: HUlmEr' J(!ilG
DATE: May 20, 1983
TO: Mayor & Council
FrOM: Brad Nielsen
Report on Burger King pending further research.
Check your mailbox On ~onday.
ga-
e
e
.
e e
ANNUAL BAS~.MEMORANDUM AGREEMENT
THIS MEMORANDUM AGREEMENT, made and entered into this lk2 day of
iDr~tl · 19U. by and between the -rnY'\1:n &bL l2,!.!i:b.....
herei after called "Athletic Association", and the City of Shorewood,
a Minnesota Municipal Corporation, hereinafter called "City":
1. The City agrees to provide to the Athletic Association the
exclusive use of City baseball facilities located at F"(".e.LV'vlan
~r~ for those dates and times which the
Athletic Association does agree to file with the City Administrator
on or before 5 days following the execution of this agreement, provid-
ed said dates are specifically approved by the City Council at its regu-
larly scheduled meeting following the filing of the dates and times of
authorized use as they deem to be in the best use of the City; dates so
approved shall not be subject to change without prior approval of the
City Administrator. Postponements may be made up on substitute dates
only after approval of such dates and times have been obtained from
the City Administrator.
2. The Athletic Association agrees, before any use of the baseball
field, it shall file a copy of a liability insurance policy naming the
City as insured in the amount of $100,000/$300,COO. Use of the City's
facilities shall not be permitted until these policies are on file.
3. This agreement shall be in existence for the balance of 198~,
subject to its being revoked on 10 days notice. In case of excess
vandalism, or lack of control of spectators, or the Association violates
any terms of this contract, the City shall be entitled to revoke use of
the field by the Athletic Association. The Association shall have an
opportunity to be heard before the City Council if they so desire during
the 10 day notice period.
4. Any use of the facility other than that authorized herein shall
result in an immediate forfeiture in further rights of tte Athletic
Association to use the same.
CITY OF SHOREWOOD:
By{l~~;f(J4j~~
By
ByJd!41j)/~~
(I
By
(C2~
ANNU_ BASEBAll. .MEMORANDUM AGREEAT
THIS MEMORANDUM AGREEMENT, made and entered into this" day of
~~y'.\ , 198.3., by and between the SC)..:r\... -r;',,~~c,. L-;\t\~ L::~~
hereinafter called "Athletic Association", and the City of Shorewood,
a Minnesota Municipal Corporation, hereinafter called "City":
..
(
1. The City agrees to provide to the Athletic Association the
exclusive use of City baseball facilities located at ~ e.'~(.-- ~~V"'~
~ C,:\\.-.c"--~ ~ c....""~ for those dates and times which the
Athletic Association does agree to file with the City Administrator
on or before 5 days following the execution of this agreement, provid-
ed said dates are specifically approved by the City Council at its regu-
larly scheduled meeting following the filing of the dates and times of
authorized use as they deem to be in the best use of the City; dates so
approved shall not be subject to change without prior approval of the
City Administrator. Postponements may be made up on substitute dates
only after approval of such dates and times have been obtained from
the City Administrator.
2. The Athletic Association agrees, before any use of the baseball
field, it shall file a copy of a liability insurance policy naming the,
City as insured in the amount of $100,OOO/$300,COO. Use of the City's
facilities shall not be permitted until these poltcies are on file.
3. This agreement shall be in existence for the balance of 19~,
subject to its being revoked on 10 days notice. In case of excess
vandalism, or lack of control of spectators, or the Association violates
any terms of this contract, the City shall be entitled to revoke use of
the field by the Athletic Association. The Association shall have an
opportuni,ty to be heard before the City Council if they so desire during
the 10 day notice period.
~. Any use of the facility other than that authorized herein shall
result in an immediate forfeiture in further rights of the Athletic
Association to use the same.
(
CI{l;; ~OD: . . .
By 11 .Wr~
By . . :,
BY~~~
By .
(:2h
~MINNETONKA .~OMMl~ITY SERVlct~~
FIELD SCHEDULING
1983
IOe..
--
..
LEAR SPRINGS SCHOOL #1
In
MONDAY
5-9 ETLL
5-9 ETLL
TUESDAY
5-9 TG
5-9 TG
. i WEDNESDAY
5-9 ETLL
5-9 ET11
THURSDAY
5-9 TG
5-9 TG
FRIDAY SATURDAY SUNDAY
5-9 !ETLL 9-5 ETLL
5-9 ETLL 9-5 TG
OTTAGEWOOD 5-9 TG 5-9 ETLL .5'-' Tb 5-9 ETLL NEIGHBOR-"9-5 TG
HOOD
EEPHAVEN SCHOOL III 5-9 TG 5-9 TG 5-9 TG 5-9 TG 5-9 TG 9-5 TG i
. i
In 5-9 TG 5-9 TG 5-9TG 5-9 TG 5-9 TG 9-5 TG
~:~..
XCELSIOR COMMONS III ~-8:30 6:30-10 6:30-10 6:30-10 OPEN OPEN OPEN
YMCA ESP MCW ESP TOURNEYS TOURNEYS TOURNEYS
8:30-10
ESP
In 5-9 S1'11 5-9 STLL 5-9 STLL CONCERT 9-12 STLL
XCELSIOR SCHOOL
IFl
In
4: 30-9 MCt-l
4:30-9 TG 5-9 TG
5-9 MCW
5-9 YMCA 5-9 TG
9-3 TG
REEMAN FIELD IFl 4:30-9 - 4:30-9 - 4:30-9 ,., - 4 :30-9-1",- -'4:30-9 8-3 TBR 12-6 TBR
TBR TBR TBR TBR TBR
In 4:30-9 4: 30-9 4:30-9 4:30-9 4:30-9 9-5 STLL 12-5 STLl
STLL STLL - STLL STLL STLL
ROVELAND IH 5-9 TG 5-9 YMCA 5-9 ETLL 5-9 TG 5-9 YMCA 9-5 TG'
In " " " \I " \I
IF3 " \I " \I " "
IF4 " \I " " " "
NNETONKA JUNIOR fH 5:30-9 HM--------------------------------------- 9-9 TG
HIGH (EAST) In 5:30-9 HM---------------------------------------- 9-9 TG
Soccer Field 4-6 TU 5-9 TU 4-6 TU 5-9 TU 5-7 TU 9-5 TU 9-5 TV
6-9 MWS 6-9 MWS
NNETONKA HIGH
SCHOOL
fFl
In
4:30-9 TL ---------------------------------------- 9-9 TL
TT-----------------------~----------------- TT
4:30-9 MM----------------------------------------- 9-9 MM
/~c
..
,
H4
~=~~~
Q-:aI h.'.
J ;.,,'.;-;,; '\411,'.
~~-~ ~,6-~ ~~~ TG&HMW*
*Before June 6 H/M to be coordinate
with ~1HS
**to be worked out cooperatively
6-9 HM
5:30-9 HH
No Charter Use of Fields #3 and #4
Soccer ~n
~n
3:30-5 TBR 3:30-9 TBR 3:30-9'TBR 3:30-5 TBR 3:30-9 TBR 9-5 TBR
5-9 TG 5-9 TG
5-9 ~~ --------------------------------------------- 9-5 CH.AN
5-9 TU ----------------------------------------------- 9-5 TU b-9
~~
~ltlll
Ft '
NNETONKA WEST #1
NNEWASRTA
SCHOOL
~n 5-9,STLL 5-9 MCW 5-9 TG 5-9 YMCA 5-9 STLL 9-9 STLL
~n 5-9 STLL 5-9 STLL 5-9 TG 5-9 STLL 5-9 STLL 9-9 TG
(infield)
~n 5-9 ETLL 5-9 TG 5-9 ETLL 5-9 TG 5-9 ETLL : .9-9 TG
~12 5-9 ETLL 5-9 TG 5-9 ETLL 5-9 TG 5-9 TG 9-9 ETLL
ENIC HEIGHTS
ORPE FIELD
5-9 ETLL 5-9 TG
5-9 ElL\.
NEIGHBOR:- NEIGHBOR- 9-5 ETLL
HOOD HOOD
CODE.".- : LEAGUE CONTACT PHONE ADDRESS SEASON DATES
TL Tonka American Legion Jim Peck 473-4311 17605 Minnetonka Blvd, 5/1-8/1
Wayzata " 55391
TT Town Team Jim Peck 473-4311 17605 Minnetonka Blvd, 5/1-8/1
Wayzata, 55391
MM Mickey Mantle Jim Peck 473-4311 17605 Minnetonka Blvd, ~/1-8/1
Wayzata, 55391
ESP Excelsior Slow pitch John Huber 474-2936 437 Lake Street, Exc. 5/1-8/1
TG Tonka Girls Softball Doug Halvorson 473-0443 17424 Ridgeview Drj Mtka 5/1-8/1
Tonka Girls Fastpitch Dick Hohertz 474-8966 5045 Hooper Lake.Rd, Mtka 6/8-8/1
ETLL East Tonka Little League Bob Berset
935-3251 4806 Hamilton Rd, Mtka
5/1-6/30
4/11-8/5
MCW
Minnetonka Community
Services ~"omen
Candy Hoops
475.0739 17703 Susan Lane; Mtka
TER
Tonka Babe Ruth
S~ott McKenzie 473-0818 3509 Comet Lane, Mtka
5/1-7/20
HM Hopkins/Minnetonka Rec. Ron'Schwartz 934-1788 14600 Mtka. Blvd., Mtka 4/11-8/5
YMCA YMCA - Ridgeda1e
Marilyn Sturm 544-7708 12301 Ridgedale Dr.,Mtka 4/11-8/5
MWS
Mtka Women's Soccer
Laurie Mark
474-7183 236 Lake Street, Exc
'5/1-11/1
TU Tonka United Soccer
~~ r-t..
STLL South Tonka Little
League
CH~~ Traveling Soccer
Vie Anderson 934-3913 4275 Churchill Cire, Mtka 5/1-8/3
~~. ~\\~,.... 3'1.o0'Sc 3'1 ,,\ C~\\ "'~ ~~o;l\\\!)l\.
Jerry Brenhofer474-4320 25 Fairhope Ave, Exc.
Ted Hasse
445-7738 630 West 96th St,
e
e
~
e
e
RESOLUTION NO.
WHEREAS, Floyd Larson, on behalf of Jim Johnson, has
applied to the City for a variance to construct garage space in
excess of that allowed under the current zoning.standards, and
WHEREAS, the matter was reviewed by the Planning
Commission on May 3, 1983, and
WHEREAS, the matter was referred to the Council by
the Planning Commission with no recommendation, and
WHEREAS, the City Council, on motion by Shaw, and
seconded by Leonardo, moved to direct the City Attorney to draw
a resolution setting forth findings and conclusions in denying
applicant's request.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of
the City of Shorewood, finds the following facts:
1. That the property in question is located at 26420
Oakridge Circle, and is legally described as Lot 7, Block 1,
Oakridge Estates.
2. That the property is currently zoned R-l and
contains approximately 42,000 square feet of area. The lot
contains a ponding area of approximately 12,100 square feet.
3. That there are presently located single-family
homes immediately adjacent to the property on the east and
west. That the property is located at the end of a cul-de-sac
in a neighborhood of single-family homes. The subject property
is presently occupied by a single-family home with an attached
two-car garage.
4. That the proposed building would be a detached
garage, approximately 26 feet by 40 feet, containing 1,040
square feet. The existing home on ground level contains 1,560
square feet.
5. The applicant desires to build the additional
garage space for storage for his motorhome and boat and
snowmobiles.
6. That a public hearing was held by the City
Council on May 9, 1983. The applicant was present, as well as
Mr. Johnson. Certain neighbors and members of the public were
present ,and presented verbal comments on the proposal. The
neighbor immediately adjacent to the east, Mr. Lee Laramie, was
present, with his attorney, William F. Kelly.
06
~
e
e
7. That Laramie through his attorney objected to a
granting of a variance, arguing that applicant had failed to
establish undue hardship.
8. That the burden is on the applicant to establish
undue hardship in order for the Council to approve the
variance.
9. That the proposed garage is not in keeping with
the essential character of the neighborhood.
10. That the property in question can be put to a
reasonable use without the granting of the variance.
11. That applicant has not established undue hardship
as defined by Minnesota Statutes.
CONCLUSIONS
That based on the foregoing, the City Council of the
City of Shorewood concludes that the request for the garage
variance, as set out hereinabove, be and hereby is denied.
Adopted by the City Council this 23d day of May, 1983.
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
.
-
. ~
--
, ,
IX,
THIS sA MUST ACCOMPANY FIRST AF PAYMENT.
1ST HALF
PAY STUB
1983
Pay on or before May 31, 1983 to avoid penalty,
Please read reverse side for payment information
TAXf'A'ER 01< A.;EI'.'
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
5755 COUNTRY CLUB RD
SHOREWOOD MN 55331
,,-,,_ " Mi Gf (...oo~
26
l..()A~.. N'..-,
,",p, "'.r'f..l41 " A::,'()~H.~S
O If name and/or address as shown above are
not correct. check box and make correction on
back of this form
PRO;~~; I;;~~ ~~T~C;. ~03 5 j ;~-~- A~ f o~ YEA~1 5 0 _~;3 - [PSi HM:-r T A.\~
I
75 . 0 2____~_J
231173431003500001500300000750223117343100352
n~~~~:~~~~~~O:. ~!;[~;i~:::~;~ :MENT STUrRE .EFO:~~~~~~ ~~~I ~T~~~~~~T
_";",f..'.,, f'c: h',.Go, f'c~ ;C')N<<45~3l'1 STATE COpy
,',",'
t, A ~~ . '-
Ph_'; E;.~l"" IDI::'';-;F-i~-AT1,~H'ol N,~ ~<.'->
.. '
34-117-23 31 0035 '2 6' ~276
3
STATE LAND DEPT
14)..;. tR:.>':''--lE'',,'
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
5755 COUNTRY CLUB RD
SHOREWOOD MN 55331
~. ~ - "
BALLS ADDN TO EXCELSIOR
~ 002 5,C, 002 "Rle
.~: .:;; -., A0~ i:E.~':
YOU MAY BE ELIGIBLE FOR A, PROPEF:TY TAX
REFUND THIS YEAR FOR INFORMATION or~ HOW TO
OBTAIN REFUND FOAMS READ DETAi~S Ot'; THE
REVERSE SIDE OF THIS STATEMEt\T
lJ~ CJ-J~. 1....1 - [; K'
.,. AX SUMMAPY
~ A\,E.:. ~E\'!E[
WHEN FilLING OUT PROPERTY TAX REFUND FORM M.1PR
USE AMOUNT PRINTED BELOW
1 OLALlF' 11\;( TAX
E".;TER ON LINE 11
2. STA.TE PAID HO~1ESTEAC CREDIT
EI\iHR ON L1\iE i:'
CPED:" ~
1 ;",l.. ;.; ... EF Ht.r <....
EXEMFT
A:::':' SPE:::IA~ ASSESS'J,ENTS
150.03
1983 TAX PAYABLE
150.03
DEL !"~:J',-'E.f'.. ~ "'; :.,,:.
Il t!\,. n;:> ,s c'1, d:ed VOJ owe Of THIS 51 ATE COpy OF THE TAX STATEMENT IS TO
D
LfIC....d..': ~;:')I.~,: a"1C .!"'f:3'. no~ :~P;::;"l
~C' ~i'" P'o;:,,;;...~ T,-,>..Rpt,Jr\c:..>'":
t":;, 1 > ,-t 0',0.: ,,1110' BE USED TO CLAIM PROPERTY Rt:FUND FROM
1I:1? ;t'.'~' (,f h;(iC'~'l:"":":.~ t\)
D ,. !'
r,VJ'~ES01 A DE?t- RTMFNT OF REVENUE
VALUE INFORMATIOt\
M.3'ke~va!Uf
A,~,l'ssed va'..],
DEi ACH PAY STUR BEFORE YOU FILE CLAIM,
USE THIS STATE COpy TO CLAIM PROPERTY TAX REFUND
/s-d'
&()
~ 215
..
~ J
scale ~. q
i
-1.
feet
"
o
2
u
'::- E ' j
~ ...
,", '-! (A.~) ~:
" ~ .
~ ...,. 1
1\ ·
t,
'"
-le
"
.~
.
'.
o
m
l.
',I
l1
" I
(~
e
'/
l!~
~
: \ ."bJ)
~~---
I~.
.~ III /
'-.. ' j ..,. a ~ .~: .
"', "'l . .~.:., 1
. .., '", ~ f
-' ~~ C~ I' /
o .
','" / .
, , . I
,. A , . / /
-," -,./ ,
. : .,. -~ /
-;I-
'i /.~Ie
.. .p
PARK
" "
I
l(~~~
~'1, '",.
.! ;,.
~ _'IffI{'"
~'t~~
; 81
-
68
~
"'.
e
e
"
.1
i
._-~.....
_. .__. ),q'~--'~
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
~RDINANCE NO. 82-03
AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO BUSINESS AND
TRADE REGULATIONS: AMENOING THE CITY CODE
BY ADDING SECTIOt-.t 1155 RELATING TO ALAR~1 SYSTEMS
:!
'I
,
::Section 1. Plymouth City Code is amended by anding a new section to
Chapter XI to read as follows:
Section 1155 - Alarm Systems
II 1155.01. Statement of'Policy. The City Council of the City of
!iPlymouth deems it necessary to provide for the special and express
'iregulations of alarm systems which are designed to siqnal the presence of
ia hazard requiring urqent attention and to which public safety personnel
lare expected to respond, in order to protect the public health, safety and
. welf are.
:l The City Council finds that the regulation of alarm systems is
'necessary in order to reduce the increasing frequency of false alarms in
IPlymouth. The great number of and increasing frequency of these false
:alarms requires intensive, time consuming efforts by the Oepartment of
iPublic Safety and thereby distracts from and reduces the level of services
;:available to the rest of the community. This diminishes the ability of
::the City to promote the general health, welfare and safety of the
!!community. In consideration for the necessity on the part of the City to
: provide numerous public safety services to all seqments of the community,
I without an undue concentration of public services in one area to work to
':the detriment of members of the general public, it is hereby decided that
::the alarm systems shall be regulated throuah the permit process descrihed
below:
.,
;the
,I
I
I.
I'
~ I
;j
:i
:1
..
:i
.,
:1
:1
!l
I
:\
I
\
1155.03. Definitions. As used herein, unless otherwise indicated,
following terms are defined as follows:
Subd. 1. "Alarm System" shall mean an assembly of eauipment and
devices (or a single device such as a solid state unit) arranqed to
signal the presence of a hazard. For the purposes of this ordinance,
the alarm, when trigqered, must be directly connected to a central
monitoring agency which then notifies the police and/or fire
departments of an emergency to which public safety personnel must
respond, or may emit an audible signal which will require urqent
attention and to which public safety personnel are expected to
respond.
Subd. 2. "Alarm User" shall mean the person, firm, partnership, ,/
association, corporation, company or organization of any kind on /~QL
whose premises an alarm system is maintained. "Alarm User" shall
include oersons occupying dwellinq units for residential purposes.
"Alarm User" shall not include persons maintaininQ alarm systems in
/
I
I
"
.'
i
.,
.,
:i
.,
.1
:1
i
,
:'
:1
~ i
il
"
I;
it
d
I'
II
'i
:1
i
I
jl
1
:1
!
I
;1
:j
:1
:\
:1
"
;1
q
~ I
II
I'
!I
il
Ii
I:
II
iI
11
,
!
I
I
,
i
I
I
I
I
'I
I.
I;
.
e
Subd.3. "False 4J.;ormc:" c:.h~ll mean the activation of an alarm system
through mechanical failure, malfunction, improoer installation, or
the neqliqence of the owner or lessee of an alarm system or of his
employees or agents. It does not include activation of the alarm hy
utility company power o~taqes or by climatic conditions such as
tornadoes, liqhtninq, earthquakes, other violent conditions of
nature, or any other conditions which are clearly hevond the control
of the alarm manufacturer, installer or owner.
Subd. 4. "Person" shall mean any individual, partnership,
corporation, association, cooperative or other entity.
Subd. 5. "Calendar Year" shall mean the period January 1 throuah
December 31 of each year.
1155.0~. Permits and Exemption~.
Subd. 1. Permits. Effective April 15, 1982, every alarm user who,
during the course of a calendar year, incurs more than three (3)
false police alarms, or more than one (1) false fire alarm shall be
required to obtain an alarm user permit.
Subd. 2. Review of Permit. The Public Safety Director shall review
the issuance of all alarm permits.
Subd. 3. Process for Issuance of Permit. Upon receipt ann
determination of the fourth false police alarm reoort, or the second
false fire alarm report at an address, the Public Safety Director,
after review, shall notify the City Clerk who shall then assess the
alarm user for an alarm user's permit. The assessment invoice shall
be sent by certified mail. The alarm user must submit the required
permit fee to the City Clerk within ten (10) workinq days after
receipt of the assessment invoice in order to continue to use his
alarm system. Any subsequent false police or fire alarms at that
address shall automatically revoke that permit and the orocess must
then be repeated. This process shall be repeated for each and every
false alarm in excess of three (3) false police alarms and in excess
of one (1) false fire alarm durinq each calendar year.
Subd. 4. Duration of Permit. All permits, unless otherwise revoked,
will expire at the end of each calendar year.
Subd.~. Exemptions. The provisions of this chapter are not
applicable to audible alarms affixed to automobiles.
1155.07. Requirements and Duties.
Subd. 1. False Alarm Reports. The Public Safety Director may, at
his discretion, require a false alarm report to be filed by the alarm
user with the Public Safety Director, within a time period to be
specified by the Public Safety Director. If the Public Safety
Director determines that a false alarm has occurred at an address,
the alarm user at that address may submit a written report to the
'Public Safety Director to explain the cause of the alarm activation.
If the Public Safety Director determines that the alarm was caused by
conditions beyond the control of the alarm user, the alarm will not
be counted as a false alarm at that address.
;j
:1
q
It
l.
\!
e
e
d 2 "False Alarms" will be excused if they. are the r-esult of an
Sub. .
effort or order to upqrade, install, test, or maintain an alarm
system and if the Public Safety Director is qiven notice in advance
of said upgrade, installation, test and maintenance.
1155.09. Prohibitions.
Subd. 1. "Alarm Systems Utilizinq Tapina or Prerecorded Messaaes."
No person shall install, monitor, or use and possess an operative
alarm which utilizes taped or prerecorded messaqes which deliver a
telephone alarm message to the police or fire department.
1155.11 Permit Fees.
Subd. 1. The fee for alarm user's permits shall be: Police - fifty
dollars ($50.00), Fire - one hundred fifty dollars ($150.00).
Subd. 2. Alarm user's permits shall expire on the last day of each
calendar year. Alarm user's permits shall not be required in the
next calendar year until there are more than three (3) false police
alarms or more than one (1) false fire alarm reported at the alarm
user's address durinq the next calendar year.
1155.13 Revocation and Suspension of Permit.
Subd. 1. Basis for revocation or suspension. In addition to the
automatic revocation process described in Section 1155.05, the Public
Safety Director may suspend or revoke any alarm user permit issued
pursuant to this ordinance if the Public Safety Director finds that
any of the following occur:
a. That any provision or condition.of this ordinance has been
violated by an alarm user or his agents~
b. That an alarm system has actuated an excessive number of false
al arms;
c. That the alarm user has knowingly made false statements in or
regardinq his application for an alarm user's permit;
d. That the alarm user has failed to correct or remove, within a
reasonable period, violations of this ordinance after receiot of
notice to do so;
.1
e. That the continued effectiveness of the alarm user permit,
constitutes a substantial threat to the public oeace, health,
safety or welfare.
I
.'
!\
I
I
1
I
I
,
\I
.
.
~
"
..
I.
~ i
"
:1
"
"
"
:\
: \
il
1\
I
I
\
\
All allegrd violations defined above shall b~ investiqated by the
P bllc Safety pepartment. The alarm user shall be given notice of the
~oposed revoc~tion of suspension and be provided an opportunity to
rnformally pre~ent evidence to the Public Safety Director prior to the
final decision on revocation or suspension. Anyone aqarieved by the
decision of t~e Public Safety Director may appeal that decision to the
Ci ty Council.
11SS.15. Criminal Penalties.
Subd. 1. Any alarm user who continues to use an alarm system after
receiving notice of revocation or suspension by the Public Safety
Director shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon conviction
thereof, shall be punishable by a fine of not more than five hundred
dollars ($500.00) and by imprisonment not to exceed ninety (90) days.
:1
1\
,I
~ \
Subd. 2. Any person required by this ordinance to obtain an alarm
user'sprrmit who knowinqly fails to do so shall be Quilty of a
misdemeanor, and uoon conviction thereof, shall be punishable hy a
fine of ,lot more than five hundred dollars (~SOO.OO) and by
imprison1\\ent not to exceed ninety (90) days.
:1
1155.17. Separability. Every section, provision, or part of this
ordinance is declared separable from every other section, provision or
part; and if ~ny section, provision or part of any ordinance shall be held
invalid,it shall not affect any other section, provision or part thereof.
: ~
.
"
Section 2. lhis ordinance shall become effective April 15, 1982.
,
i
': Adopted this 1st day of March, 1982.
:\
I
"
LlfJe~
;i
:1
:\
:i
"
,\ ATTEST:
"
:1
,j r:3:4iJ1t::;:J
..
Il
\1
II
CALL TO ORDER:
The regular ~eeting of the Shorewood City Council was called to
order bYD.c~rnDJ._at (time) 7:32. Monday(date)('Y)/}JA2-3in the
Council Chambers. ~~. .----,
PLEDGE 421, %
'L1.L(
ROLL CALL
Present
Staff
MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR
/
AGENDA ITEM NO. c:::z.,
Presentation:
ACTION:
MCU
Roll Call Vote
~ -.J!!Y
Motion/Resolution By:
Secorded by:
THAT:
Mayor
Haugen
Shaw
Leonardo
Rascop
INSTRUCTIONS:
...
~ ~ain.-.- ~
-~ )xt
~~
\) ~ '-i--WJ - Lh~
~~GYI~.~
ikJJ
~ ,
-~0JM
<)
~--~
1. ~\- alLcYz;v1
r tvL UJ.Lb.t
AGENDA ITEM NO.
Presentation:
~
Motion/ResolutionBy:
Secorded by:
THAT:
INSTRUCTIONS:
1tDb Goo-h-L C~
k~ CJ1JmiD _
wcctM~ ~-
ACTION:
MCU
Roll Call Vote
~ -..!!,y
Mayor
Haugen
Shaw
Leonardo
Rascop
6. ^L".J:' r--:?~ /. ^~ -' ,., A..., (7.. 2
V~~ c'- ~,~rL ~?'/~ .
AGENDA ITEM NO. 3
Presentation:
ACTION:
MCU
Roll Call Vote
~ -..!!Y
Motion/ResolutionSy:
Seccn:Jed by:
THAT:
Mayor
Haugen
Shaw .
Leonardo
Rascop
INSTRUCTIONS:
Tcul
---. --- .....
7Lcvn Urrnm ~ t~o
1,.~-6J-5 ~T
2.
3,
~Q.~ ~ ~'-- ,
\rvYI~a - ~ wc&+h? ~
yY);t. Q~ 3~1 OU5pt~
o~ ~ tero. doOt ~ ~ -- wIit -t-eU4-
~.-
~I.- l/Yl ~ -kl h~ ~ &1
\ I'" ~" Ctt - b k: YY'l.Cl:t \o.e.. 1'11-. ^" I. '" I -
~++ ~VY' ~ _.~
'__ \;'l5CJ * 2. . C(f5 oUt CJ.N?l ~
PlUNl C6wwn-~ ~a1-l -Lv~\
tu.Ju- Levu. ci ~ Ob ~ <;-
~ oJ..o~-1 -~
AGENDA ITEM NO.'~
Presentation:
-~ ~
\.
ACTION:
MCll
Roll Call Vote
~ -.]!!y
Motion/ResolutionSy:
Seconded by:
THAT:
Mayor
Haugen
Shaw
Leonardo
Rascop
INSTRUCTIONS: ~A8AM~
Yn/;. ~/)?CfJ\~~rti,Ld tv~ ~ Va.ti.L.L
-~-~i-~ b'
~~
-~ r;;:;; ~~~~ ~
R-~ t>>il.L h4uL ~ Cb~_
v3Ua-,
d
l1at~
-------------
:]) Il--l._~ . ~~
ry;;:; ~_
3>~~~~-
o '8B t?2.:f "'" -b (" .J.L~~ ?
(J) wf,a;E ab7 rnc-~J?.U.j
/<....l/
- ~ ~ A)J/)J"-::; ~-
st--d.-- ~
)nCCa-a;~ ~IC-I ~
-----
~
~ -=- (.'50
~:ao -- '
AGENDA ITEM NO. ~. 1
..Presentation: p~~~
Motion/ResolutionBy:
Seccn:1ed by:
THAT:
ACTION:
HCll
Roll Call Vote
~ -.l!!Y
Mayor
Haugen
Shaw
Leonardo
Rascop
~
INSTRUCTIONS:
OP#2- 9/11'J
AGENDA ITEM NO. \5
pre-;;;b;;dtM/at>uJb ~
Motion/Resolution By:
Seccxded by:
THAT:
ACTION:
HCU
Roll Call Vote
~ - .Nay
Mayor
Haugen
Shaw .
Leonardo
Rascop
-
INSTRUCTIONS: fn/l. aJ r::JtIw1~/
____frytM ~5 j)Cr~'
/6Ud;-~~
-Iv
/'
c1
jX8t. will rBl ~.. ~
fnrJ, LV: -
(!jo{W;tP tLb1ic- pt>11im a:t q,' (Yf
rr~ ptftuU- ;gt:h .~
AGENDA ITEM NO. .1I!!J\
Presentation:
ACTION:
MCU
Roll Call Vote
~ -.l!!Y
Motion/Reso1utionBy:
Secaded by:
THAT:
Mayor
Haugen
Shaw .
Leonardo
Rascop
INSTRUCTIONS:
,
.....SQQ5tt-l-ktvU - ~
'" '1
3' 0IttlL'5 I. ~ Cl CII"M; 3 3 V s 3-A - b WlQ,y) c-(Qj
q~
~
2..~~
3.
I1'tl5Wct ~ bad< C1pfWJ'P EO It
~ d. . hi tUlWM...
W Qei fle 6'n N.
,
cULlJ.LUJ . .. .
J;Yi1U M uth ~. esb ~.
. ~
3q .. ~ (Ll-Z))
-31 0lJt ~ (341 (
hffLtJ0 D1ili ~
-fMmt -^( ~ +0 b.4 ~ P.UD.
AGENDA ITEM NO~ ~ p~ 2-
Presentation: \
ACTION:
HCU
Roll Call Vote
~ -.J!!Y
Motion/Resolution By:
Secorded by:
THAT:
Mayor
Haugen
Shaw
Leonardo
Rascop
- ......---,
--
INSTRUCTIONS:
-.... --- -. p1A ~ 39
33 - S)fxJD ~
I :l ~ +- h.i&h q() } 600
'L 7 1 + - tYu.cl ZOJ <JOO
hltL] S~ ~
~
\ MO~S'S
~vrn ~- f:t~tut
AdJuDm~ - .
mn BlYlehoAt - ~ I
fllliwl Q ~ d)'LW-tWCtLf ~ )
~ 35 {t ~ ~ dJuLLUUG.LJ
(f\D^r Oi JUDP). G~ .l)~ Ll:iuwwvJ <te~b.le
~ CJ ~~o pllzh) I
<2-
~
,
AGENDA ITEM NO. 1 - PB . 3
Presentation:
ACTION:
HCU
Roll Call Vote
~ -.1!ll
Motion/Resolution.By:
Seconded by:
THAT:
Mayor
Haugen
Shaw
Leonardo
Rascop
INSTRUCTIONS:
-___ --8 Mchort
JC4\)IMJL- ~~ ~ ~
D ~ - 3 U/vut0 P-VL CLClLL-
JU..\) tW
QQ;t~~~
~ L Lit DiJul.ctlULQ
1
~
~~
~
~~J
YTht -U - olIltb-
\M. \f3b~- PrsNl WC-y
~c:sn 19.- s'ro
, DUt- f~
EtL-
AGENDA ITEM NO. ~7 - P3' 4-. I
Presentation: .:.. . \
ACTION:
MCU
Roll Call Vote
~ -..!!Y
Motion/Resolution.By:
Seconded by:
THAT:
Mayor
Haugen
Shaw .
Leonardo
Rascop
------- -
INSTRUCTIONS:
~__ ~-~~ +dr chg:)
L0uo al~ YY\MlT
~~
--
f)!5J1a!d p~
~1ir? - .~8CLu
~ thMP2.~ oj tfJ)/,... I,
ands ~ - Ej$w~
M> !IwtAL ~ .~. J'37:h ~)
3~
~-w~.~_, .
dike f d2r1tJm sM- LI,(l. ~ ~ /!oldJm() j)tJJJd}
~-aL- ~~E)~ ..7
~ k-img
AGENDA ITEM NO. B
Presentation:
ACTION:
HCU
Roll Call Vote
.~ -.J!!Y
Mayor ________
Haugen____ ____
Shaw .
---- ----
Leonardo
---- ----
Rascop ________
Motion/Resolution.By:
Seccnled by:
THAT:
INSTRUCTIONS: ,
YY1t wuYWD-d . 8w:l-~
~.jJLn -4 ~{~
\In CfLCWL -to ' .
6c:in 3 ~ pw ~ 4VJ
I
.>
xD
.~
..~~
'XY rgJ
<:0)
~ .0n Vat ~ ~ k\l)f IN 1D~IN.q
t2cmy -JJf2fd. .- \ .. .. .'
\\n.~ . +0 IH\f'\flrojp ~ ~ ~~
'fJ'1\\' _ Tdcl ~~V~ . ~
3 ~ 'rn61imJ.~
AGENDA ITEM NO. ~
Presentation:
\.
ACTION:
HCU
Roll Call Vote
~-~
Motion/Resolution By:
Secon:led by:
THAT:
Mayor
Haugen
Shaw
Leonardo
Rascop
INSTRUCTIONS: ~ .
~. J'/2))U fYUIJ tJM2.L ~ {!W 1M Pa:L
/hIl. ShtuD-
-/3w4
\ C"
Uns~~ (a;Iud ~ .Mj~
~L~~ae~an.
m \ Iu; el11; 6npvb..~
~ Q/U/ )?z) 8nf. .. ... · J
TaJ~
/)joWn (!{j/M~ -3
~J Utio)
AGENDA ITEM NO. a
Presentation: '.
Motion/Resolution By:
Seccxded by:
THAT:
ACTION:
HCll
Roll Call Vote
~ - Nay
c)Mayor
'Haugen
Shaw
Leonardo
Rascop
INSTRUCTIONS: .
-- .- - n);\ · f)11liJJ (]JY).[ r1
I ffr5l1im - ~U~
r-
~
z
"
~ Jll~
IdJThr ...~
Y1()t. ....ro tw
~.. .a1t. .~
.~. hBtD. CllLL-
OJmtiuh4cl ITY\
~..................
t6. ~.Lfsuj ~
wtub.Q ~
~.--oo.~
AGENDA ITEM NO. L
Presentation: Tad.. _ \
Motion/Resolution-By:
Seccn::led by:
THAT: P!an O>>rrm
INSTRUCTIONS:
II
ACTION:
HCU
Roll Call Vote
~ -.1!!Y
Mayor __
Haugen
Shaw
Leonardo
Rascop
3 v'l-eCCZ5/YL - {, - GJ
2. ~ 13.8.
~ ,~ p~
~ Ou.:i-ht- E
3. /1r; ~-u
~ do U/L-Lh o-kr
/-< '.'
"
...,
1
---
==-
~Q;?jE
AGENDA ITEM NO. }0
Presentation:
Motion/ResolutionBy: ~~
Seconded by: J..LJ1'~
THAT:
. Mayor k:.
Haugen
Shaw
Leonardo
Rascop
ACTION:
MCU
Roll Call Vote
~ -.1!!Y
~
-
~
v
~
INSTRUCTIONS:
I. C()YY) m fU-cILLL Q1:L.u m
~~ :Jjl.A;}LVL -
~
Z.Q~~~
Lt. p~~
5~
Page Noo_
COUNCIL MEETING NOTES
Regular_Other_
Place:
Date: Time:
Mayor
Haugen
Shaw
Leonardo
Rascop
.Present X Staff Present:
Clerk
Engineer
Attorney
Planner
X
AGENDA ITEM NO 0 J 5- f)
Presentation:
\
~
ACTION:
MCU
Roll Call Vote
~-..1i!Y
Motion/Resolution By: . .. ~ ~-t. Mayor
SecoOOed by: ~~ ~ ~~~;en
~...' ~ n tlnl\m\~b.u.b1 ~~ Leonardo
.\1' .r--~-- - '-^1""'f' ~ v ~ _ Rascop
q-acl - vD
INSTRUCTIONS: . ,... _ ~ 10 ~ ~
0t(U{ \) ~ - n..woccIil6il ) <<- -. .~
~Ofvt:b
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15-B J- ~ me- ~(~
Presentation: ,.. MCU
. I ~ Roll Call Vote
~""~~yor ~ - Nay
Sec<nled by: Id.~: Nck- j, ~ JltJ./b ~~~~en
THAT: /13 .~ In.. 1Ul/..U//YlfJ; 5/6.' Leonardo
b IuJ -3~1u-~ ~/tJ, - Rascop
INST~UCTIONS: . I_Ob
(Jtf4- ~.-Mckf- ck>t4 ~ -~~5for
AGENDA ITEM NO. /$- ~
ACTION:
Motion/Resolution By:
Presentation:
ACTION:
MCU
Roll Call Vote
~ -J!!.!
Motion/Resolution By:
SecoOOed by:
THAT:
Mayor
Haugen
Shaw '
Leonardo
Rascop
~
Page Noo__
COUNCIL MEETING NOTES
Place:
/6-~
Date:
Time:
Regular__Other-
.Present X
Staff Present: X
Clerk
Engineer
Attorney
Planner
Mayor
Haugen
Shaw
Leonardo
Rascop
AGENDA ITEM NO.
Presentation:
/5- f;
~~
Motion/Resolution By:
Secorded by:
"
~
Mayor
Haugen
Shaw '
Leonardo
R~scop
ACTION:
MCU
Roll Call Vote
~ -.1!!Y
THAT:
~ ?JbMc-
Let .
~CTIONS: ~ Ve> 2de:2-~~
~.... .... add+IJ;-n,j-o~
AGENDA ITEM NO. Ic~-F '.
Presentation:
ACTION:
MCU
Roll Call Vote
~ - Nay
Motion/Resolution By:
Seconded by:
THAT:
cUR-
Yt~,
Mayor
Haugen
Shaw
Leonardo
Rascop
AGENDA ITEM NO.
Presentation:
~@,
ACTION:
MCU
Roll Call Vote
~ -.1!!.I
Motion/ResolutionBy:
Seconded by:
THAT:
Mayor
Haugen
Shaw .
Leonardo
Rascop
INSTRUCTIONS:
Page Noo_
COUNCIL MEETING NOTES
Place:
Date:
Time:
Regular___Other___
.Present X
Staff Present: X
Clerk
Engineer
Attorney
Planner
Mayor
Haugen
Shaw
Leonardo
Rascop
AGENDA I TEM NO. ..-l..fi::. F
Presentation: Rrrn25J-b LVU.-f Well
OJlNYlD. J"l.L~ ~ I
Mo~i~~i~y:
SecoOOed by:
THAT: ~
llliLp)
ACTION:
MCU
Roll Call Vote
~ - Nay
Mayor
Haugen
Shaw '
Leonardo
R~scop
INSTRUC~ _ ~ peol
AGENDA ITEM NO.
presentation:t1A";li~. ,
. /Y)(f/)i. L:U#'Uf ~ ~
Motion/Resolution Byt .... &..... . .
SecoOOed by:
ACTION:
MCU
Roll Call Vote
Aye -Nay
INSTRUCTIONS:
dttlp
Mayor
Haugen
\ . Shaw
Mfl~n7J)Y;..... .])./ Leonardo _
'Vl./~'"1.' Rascop
'........' , ..'...-
7~rz(!tll!&4 JajJ~tf).amcl ~
~..... t? rtmdlv1f ~.'
THAT:
AGENDA ITEM NO.
Presentation:
ACTION:
MCU
Roll Call Vote
Aye -J!!!
Hotion/Resolution By:
Sec:aD!d by:
THAT:. ~_~.~
Mayor
Haugen
Shaw .
Leonardo
Rascop
INSTRUCTIONS:~Pl1 ~ GeiTf1Ilt1:~;;IJ IhLd hatIL
(J-l~~~ ~
AGENDA ITEM NO.
Presentation:
Mayor
Haugen
Shaw
Leonardo
Rascop
ACTION:
HCU
Roll Call Vote
~ -.J!!y
Motion/ResolutionBy:
Seccn:Jed by:
THAT:
INSTRUCTIONS:
'W
f~
~
~~S2d-+X biu
'. \.. .,
uAA conLlmuJ ~W1J
no,~ ~~ wYnJ:-
(( L.Iy ~L SDOO -ch.W Co2-)
t>
~ ~ GtoJ
~.~.~
Page 2 - ~inutes, Council Keeting
City of 3horewood
September 8, 1975
BNGINZER'S n;::PORT - Traffic Study (contd.)
It was then moved by Keeler, seconded by Huttner, to rescind a previous
motion of August 12, 1975, making Third Avenue a one-way going west. ~lotion carried
by a unanimous vote of the council.
It was moved by Huttner, seconded by Keeler to place a counter system for about
five days, to authorize the engineer to consult with ~~celsior's engineer to arrange
for placement of the counters in Excelsior at the same time that they are placed in
Shorewood. Seconded by K~eler. Motion carried unanimously.
ATTO~~Y'S PGPORT
Sewer Connections
rhe clerk reported that there were still some thirty residents on the mainland
that had not connected to the sanitar,y sewer system. It was agreed to start charging
sewer service charges on the billing for the last quarter where sewer is available,
even though not hooked up, upon adoption of an ordinance providing for such charges.
Sewer Ch~
A possible increase in the city sewer service charges to cover the increased
service charges being proposed by the r,:etro :'iaste Control Commission as vlell as
our increased costs for operating the lift stations was discussed. Clerk agreed to
compile the necessar,y data and make a recommendation; and if an increase is necessar,y,
it should be effective for the last quarter of 1975.
~:innetrista r,:etro Sewer Line
- -
Since !.:innetrista is attempting to collect $400.00 a month from Shorewood
as the interest on the costs of installation of the interceptor line to carr,y
sewage from the islands to the metro sewer, the engineer suggested that the mayors
and attorneys from the two cities meet to discuss the matter again in hopes of
getting the I,letro Council to act. Kayor Frazier agreed to arrange for such a meeting.
S~CIAL ASSESS~IJ'~ - DELINQu~NT SERVICE CHARcr~S
It ~;as moved by Keeler, seconded by Haugen to schedule a public hearing to levy
special assessments on those delinquent utility charges as of June 30, 1975, not
paid by October 1, 1975, to be certified to the county for collection. Motion
carried unanimously.
Nm;-COUFOP1HNG ljSE - 60 FEET OF rrRACr C, R. L. S. 160
Horace !,:urfin requested consideration of the council to recognize that a certain
portion of the R-l area south of the presently zoned C-3 has been used in conjunction
with the commercial use of the area and to designate the full 60 feet across the
back of the property as non-conforming use, to be used for parking; thereby the
residence and old sheds would be removed. Three property owners of the Shady Hills
area spoke against it. It was moved by Frazier, seconded by Haugen, to designate
as non-conforming use ~ 25' of Tract C on the east and angle to the west to a
60' of 'Tract A; this .../Quld encompass the area originally used as non-conforming.
Upon vote being taken, Kayor i<'razier and Councilwoman Haugen voted aye; Councilmen
Keeler, Naegele and Huttner voted nay. Motion failed.
Fage 3 - l.:inutes, Council r,;eeting
City of Shorewood
September 8, 1915
il::SOLU rICK t:O. or] 1-1'
.' Keeler t:-,en moved to square off the area and designate the 60' ofrract A and Tract C ..t-<.-
I'
'\ an~ to re~uire that a deed restriction be placed on the balance of Tract A and C to
\.' prohibit any commercial usage of that portion. On roll call vote being taken,
:raugen and ?razier voted nay, Huttner, Keeler and Naegele voted aye. 'rhe motion
carried.
(Bob r;ae,;ele '.vas then excused from the meeting.)
arSR rr';:;LSm~- B11CPIN COUNTY PUBLIC HORKS
Lutr:er Nelson of the Hennepin County Public ~~orks Department appeared to discuss
the counter proposal made by Shorewood to Hennepin County relative to the county's
proposed ~urchase and use of the Portable Dredging property.
~everal possible options were discussed. Since the amount of use now generated
out of that operation \'las not objectionable to Shorewood, the following were open
for consideration:
1) that all private \'lork could be approved by the council
2) lease could be renegotiable after five years
3) county use only would be desirable
~uther Nelson agreed to take all the suggestions under consideration and come back
for further negotiation.
320r.:S I,:ARKC'r CONIlITIONS
;.:r. John ::)odson of Shady Hills .infomed the council that in his opinion the city
and the OImer of Brom' s r.:arket had not complied '.vi th the tems of the agreement
relative to the parking of trucks on the Brom's Kaxket and the dumping in the
area. ~vidently no dumping signs had been removed. Council agreed the signs
\'jould. be replaced on the south side of the service road and that there would be
compliance only with the tems of the original agreement.
SE.~E TR:2 ::nSEAS::: CONTROL
Council agreed to the modification of the forms as previously approved that will be
most functional and still within the tems of the original agreement and to further
instruct the attorney to draw up any necessary contracts with the participating
cities relative to a burning site.
CIGARETTE LIC~NSS APPROVED
It was moved by Keeler, seconded by Huttner, to approve the application for cigarette
licenses for the balance of 1915 for the sale of cigarettes at Burger-King and
Brady's Drug Store. Motion carried unanimously.
(Naegele returned.)
ADVERTISING FOR BIDS ON COMP1E'I'E LANDSCAPING-BADGER FIELD (HUll)
f8S0LUTIOf.I NO. 51, - 7 S-
It was moved by Keeler, seconded by Huttner, to authorize the engineer to prepare
the specs and to advertise for bids on the landscaping of Badger Field as applied
for and approved by IIUU under the Urban County Grant. I.lotion carried unanimously.
".,y'~ :''l:...:.' -
0',':.,
//A1..,aJ;'.._ -.'.~/
~R'~~,.,:~/.<..~~. ..
.. '~". .
I. / R
. . . '. .... Ste:Fr. Ci~
William Keellrr
Robert N.tege'-
Jack Huttner
JIIn Hlugen
CLERK.ADMIN ISTRA TOR
. Elsa Wiltsey
. .,. ~.
- ....:,~:
CITY OF
SHOREWOOD
20630 MANOR ROAD . SHOREWOOD. MINNESOTA 55331 . (612) 474-3236
April 29, 1976
John E. lee, Jr.
Attorney at law
17917 Highway 7
Minnetonka, MN 55343
Re: Burger King Property
GO' of Tract C-RlS 160
The city counoll has received several requests as.to
Mr. lambin's compliance with the provisions of the .
council action relative to the non-conforming use
permit that was granted to John lambin for the Burger"'
King on September 8, 1975 for the north sixty feet .
of Tract C, RlS 160.
The council has asked that you be reminded that there
were restrictions agreed on, prohibiting any commercial
usage of the balance of Tract C, RlS IGO (except the
north sixty feet) at the time the non-conforming use
was grante~ for the .nGrth sixty feet. .
Could you furnish us with evidence that these restric-
tions have been filed with the deed.
Yours truly,
.,
CITY OF SHOREWOOO
Elsa Wiltsey
Clerk-Administrator
A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South SIlo"
.:h..." U....d
..Idualr.. Individual
Form No. 27-M
.'...... --... ...... .-.........,......
Minn....... Uni'orm (;onv(')'.....;nll Blink. (R(.vi,,'d 1974)
---
ml)iS lhlbenture, .llatlf'IIIis 8th till !I of Nove.ber
11f'//('f'f'II Horace G. Mur:tin and Lura S. Mur:Cin,
husband and wi:te,
. IfJ 76
of III!, ('011 II I!I of
p"r/1 e s of I II f' Ii rsl fill rl, a IItI J-F
o~ John C. Lambin and Fred
of fI/f' ('011 II I!I of Hennepin
m". I Y CJ f I II f' ,~f' f'OI/I I /la 1'1 , .
alltl Sla/f' of
ENTERPRISES, a co-partnership
N. Whiting, partners,
,,"t1 Sla/f' of Minneaota
conaiatinc
WlhlClSlSCtI.J. Tllal Ihf' .~aitl /larl' iea of fll(', fir.~t /larl, in ,'onsir/"1'f,liOIl of the ..,,,m of
One.. .p._C?:l~aJ:" .<1..1,...00) and other good and va~~lIb~e consideration "'JfJ1:';:1~
lo1;hemin lIall(/ /laid by Ihf' .,aid purt. Y of Ihe .,econd /lart, III,' 1'f'rf'i/l' whf'1'f'uf ;"" hf'1',.by
arkllowlf'r/ted, du .. IH'r.t'b!l aranl. LJartain. Qllitrlaim, and CunrwYllnlo III" .~a;d /lflr'. y of tI/f'
.,crolld pari'. .i. ts I,,'ir., and a,'I8it".". Forever, all the .tNlct or /IaN't.t of lflnd lyint alld
bt'illt in the CO/filly of ..Ii~llnep:l,n.. a'H~ Slate of Minnr.'IOlfl, dr..u~ril}('d a.~ follow.'t, to-wit: I
Tract C, Registered Land Survey No. ~60, Fi~es o~ Registrar o:t Tit~es, I
Hennepin County. Minnesota, except that part thereo~ ~ying northweater~y
o~ the :to~~owing described ~ine commencing at a point on the north ~ine
o:t said Tract J3 :teet West o:t the Northeast corner o:t aaid Tract C to .
point on the West ~ine o:t aaid Traot C, 60 :teet South o:t the Northweat
corner o:t said Tract C.
First parties make and second party accepts this conveyance upon the I
cond\tion and restriction that the :to~lowing described parce~ o:t land II
which is a part o:t the above described parcel o:t land shall be used :tor
residential purposes only, to-wit. That part o:t aaid Tract C, Registered
Land Survey No. ~60, lying South o:t a line which is parallel to and 287
:teet North of the South line o:t sai.d Tract C. The a:torementioned
bond it ion and restriction ahall run with the land ~nd shall be binding
upon the second party. its heirs, ~ucceasors, and asaigna, :tor a period
o:t 30 years :trom date hereo:t.
This conveyance 'shall not release or convey the intereat o:t the, Cirat
parties in that certain mortgage by and between John C. La.bin and
Mary N. Lambin. his wi:te, and Fred N. Whiting and Patrioia A. WhitinC.
his wi:te, mortgacoes, to Horace G. Murfin, alkla H. G. Mur:tin, dated
October 11, 1975. in the principal .u. of $17,000.00, .aid .ortaac. to
be in :tu~l :torce and ef:teot.
STATE DEED TAX DUE. '2.20
; .
Tax s'latemcnt:. for Ih~ r. :: ;. r I," :/ t! ,.',:' ,
In this Instrument S!I;:'C!J bJ s,:;::t ,..):
John C. Lambin
No. 10 Water Str.e~..._
Excelsior. MN ~~~~1
U:::o 1LJ~bc anb to Jt,olb tl.Jt fellmt. Totf'-t"n wilh flll '",' "r,.,.dil,,,,, ""/11 ",,,1 ",,/llIrlrnfllU',...
lItt'N'If" I fJ "f'!fJ,i still ~ fJr i II ,"tlJwi..,~ ap/I"rl,flittill t. to t" r .'tf,ir/ /lart Y of tilt' ,,,'rottd pari. it.
h"ir." 'IIffl (l.~:~i~n... FOrf'II,.r.
1In 'Gtt'timonp U1btrtof. The .wid part i..of tilt' /lr.'tt,fJ~Jrt I", ve 1If'1'f'IIltto ..rt
hllnflS t",~ rlflY awl Yt~ar fir..t llbot)f! writtrn. S---1
,~;.., tr7(~ c' ( " /( / { /
., ,-... (,.... ,. c.. . (...
Horace G. Mur:tin
M/Uv 6,
their
Lura'S. MurCin
.. '-
'-
.
~1^Y()H
SII'\'!' fl.I.'Il'!
COlJNCI L
Wdll.1I11 """'11"
H nh,.rt N "f~~Jl'lf~. .Ir
.1.\l1.',ltlfll'l1
I.1l1 Sl1.IW
.
CITY OF
SHOREWOOD
(:11 HI', AIJMINI:,IH^IOH
Elsa W"ts~y
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD . SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 . (612) 474-3236
October 27, 1980
\
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
As of this date the lot known as Tract C, Registered Land
Survey No. 160, Hennepin County, Minnesota, is zoned R-l
with a deed restriction on file (November 22, 1976) which
applies to the land which lies south of a line parallel to
and 287 feet north of the south line of said Tract C - for
residential purpos~s only.
inistrator
A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore