Loading...
110304 PK AgPCITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD SPARK COMMISSION MEETING CITY HALL WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 3, 2004 7:00 P.M. AGENDA 1. CONVENE PARK COMMISSION MEETING A. Roll Call Davis Gilbertson Meyer _ Young Farniok Westerlund Wagner B. Review Agenda 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. Park Commission Meeting Minutes of September 28, 2004(Att. #2A Draft Summary) 3. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR 4. MN PARK AND RECREATION — Michelle Synder (Att. - #4) 5. COMMUNITY REC RESOURCES — (Att. - #5) A. Quarterly Report B. 2005 Process Change C. Proposed Changes for Park Priority Plan 6. REPORTS A. Report on City Council Meeting of October 11, 2004 and October 25, 2004 7. DISCUSS POTENTIAL CONTRIBUTION FOR OFF -LEASH DOG PARK AT LAKE MINNEWASHTA REGIONAL PARK (Att. - #7) 8. CONCESSION STAND REPORTS AND OPERATIONS (Att. - #8) 9. DISCUSS SIGNS FOR THE PARKS (Att. - #9) 10. DETERMINE LIAISON FOR NOVEMBER AND DECEMBER CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS 11. NEW BUSINESS Council Liaison: November: 12. ADJOURNMENT December: CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD PARK COMMISSION MEETING CITY HALL », TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 28, 2004 7:00 P.M. MINUTES of, , �� ;_� r� c�';�, �t � 1 1. CONVENE PARK COMMISSION MEETING Chair Davis called the meeting to order at 7:02 p.m. A. Roll Call Present: Chair Davis; Commissioners Meyer, Young, Farmok, Westerlund, and Wagner; City Engineer Brown; and City Council liaison Zerby Absent: Commissioner Gilbertson was absent B. Review Agenda Item #9, Signs, was moved to the goals and priorities section of the agenda item #7. Farniok moved, Meyer seconded, Approving the agenda as amended. Motion passed 6/0. 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. Park Commission Meeting Minutes of August 10, 2004 Westerlund asked for a review of the motion under item #7 and that revisions be made to clarify the motion more clearly. Westerlund moved, Meyer seconded, to approve the Minutes of the August 10, 2004 Park Commission Meeting subject to review of the taped motion under item #7 and revisions so noted. Motion passed 6/0. B. Park Commission Special Meeting Minutes of August 31, 2004 Young moved, Meyer seconded, to approve the Minutes of the August 30, 2004 Park Commission Meeting as presented. Motion passed 6/0. 3. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR Meyer asked if the Commission would be getting an update regarding the Freeman Plaza. Brown indicated that they would give an update under the Capital Improvement Program. 4. REPORTS A. Report on City Council Meeting of September 13 and 27 • Brown reported that on September 13 the City Council amended the Park Foundation by -laws to reflect that they are an autonomous entity from the City, removing the directive that directors of the Foundation be appointed by the City Council. Accordingly, the requirement was also removed from the City Ordinance as well. PARK COMMISSION MINUTES TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 28, 2004 PAGE 2 OF 8 F � t On other matters, the City Council approved the sign permit for the South Tonka Little League, the Donor Policy, and the Freeman Park Plaza Plan per the Park Commissions recommendations. In addition, Brown stated that the amendment that revised the term for the Park Commission to three years beginning March I" running through the last day in February was approved. Brown reported that the September 27` meeting contained an amendment to the Ordinance that the Chair and Vice -Chair for both the Planning and Park Commission be chosen by the Commission itself. While this has been the practice, the Ordinance was revised to reflect this policy. In addition, work sessions have been held in which residents discussed concerns regarding overflow drainage near Freeman Park through the Shorewood Oaks neighborhood. Since this tune, Council has directed staff and representatives of WSB to take a look at the area to determine the most practical method of addressing the drainage concerns and overflow of that area. Recommendations were made by WSB which included an option to pave the walkway area and create a drainage swale, which would also formalize the entrance to the park. A second option, would be for the City to consider covering the cost of installing a pipe from the property boundary of Freeman Park all the way to Shorewood Oaks to the north. The pipe eventually would spill out into the proposed Freeman Wetland area project. With neighborhood feedback, the City Council recommended staff proceed with the outflow swale through the side yards of the homes via the City outlot at a cost of roughly $15,000 and that the City continue to monitor the situation. If it is determined that this solution does not function well, then installation of a pipe would be considered through the Shorewood Oaks neighborhood at a cost of nearly $60,000- 70,000 +. Brown stated that the downside to the pipe installation would be that the neighbors in Shorewood Oaks would be responsible for gaining easements through the very back yards of some residents in the Shorewood Oaks development. Wagner asked what the collection point would be. L,.�a A + 4' +t o �. ,,.,,�rA fi„ Rr�,xm stated that the F' bituminous r , wnt�lcl ri I , Ueu out CA Ule stornn,vate. und, L h. r __-_ an as for as the fire hydrant and ultimately end up in the gutter of Shorewood Oaks Drive. He noted that the future improvements to the Freeman Park Pond will improve the water quality immensely. 5. UPDATE FROM CARVER COUNTY PARKS ON DOG PARK Lenny Schmitz, of the Carver County Parks system, updated the City on its progress in partnering with several communities to further the off leash dog park in Lake Minnewashta Regional Park. Schmitz informed the Commission that the City of Chanhassen Park Commission has passed a recommendation to their Council to allocate $20,000 in their 2005 CIP for the development of the off leash dog park and the City of Victoria has passed a recommendation to their Council to commit $5,000 to the project. He noted that the City of Excelsior did not express much interest in participating in the project at this time, nor did the City of Chaska. He indicated that Carver county Parks has begun the process of directing Brauer and Associates, a landscape architects specialty company, to look at a couple of alternative site plans. Davis asked how the Park system plans to contact dog owners to gauge their interest. PARK COMMISSION MINUTES ' "TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 28, 2004 PAGE 3 OF 8 • Schmitz indicated that they have been contacted by a minimum of several hundred dog owners who support the dog park and will spread word of the project. While most emails have been favorable, there is always controversy when it comes to designating an area for off leash dog parks. Westerlund asked whether dogs on leashes would be allowed within. the rest of the park. Schmitz stated that the off leash dog park would consist of approximately 15 acres; however, leashed dogs would be allowed within other areas of the park. While the estimation for the initial investment for the dog park is $40,000, the park would take over costs for running the park. Davis indicated that she wished to be kept abreast of the progress the County makes. She inquired how the park would raise funds and charge for the parks use. Schmitz encouraged the Shorewood Park Commission to consider pledging an amount or making a recommendation to its Council supporting a partnership with the Carver County Park System. He explained that Carver County Park would bill the partner cities once the plans have been determined based on the amount of money available from its partners. While enforcement gets to be an issue, Schmitz stated that the dog park would have a separate entrance and honor boxes. Farniok asked if the Park was going to go forward with the level of support it has been given to date. Schmitz reiterated that they plan to proceed with the initial steps of working with Brauer and Associates on some initial site plans for the dog park. He promised to keep the Commissioners informed of upcoming meeting dates. Ann Nye, 1641 West 63rd Street — Excelsior, owner of the Wayzata Book Store, presented the Commission with a petition containing over 150 names of residents from the lakes area who support the construction of a dog park. She stated that there are a large number of people within the lakes area that are excited about the potential of a dog park in the. Minnewashta Regional Park. She encouraged the City of Shorewood to participate in the partnership, especially since little room remains within Freeman Park for this addition. Meyer asked for ideas of how to raise money for the construction of the dog park. While she did not have immediate ideas, Nye stated that she would be willing to assist in the fundraising efforts for the dog park. She believed that most people would be willing to purchase an additional permit to use the dog park, which would also raise funds for dog parks construction. Tam Akins, 603 Glencoe Rd - Excelsior resident, stated that he would love to see the dog park delineated in the park; however, pointed out that the terrain of the current area used for dogs is not really suitable for another use than a dog park area. He explained that the park is used most by dog owners, in contrast to any other use at the park, and did not want to see limits set on the area used by . pet owners. Davis asked what Mr. Akins was proposing. Akins stated that he did not see why the park needs to identify a dog park area at all, `if it ain't broke, don't fix it' was his philosophy. Due to the rough terrain, he maintained that it is the dog owners and PARK COMMISSION MINUTES TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 28, 2004 PAGE 4 OF 8 A not recreational users who are using the park now; therefore, additional expenditures to put up fencing or parking are unnecessary. 0 From a community point of view, Meyer indicated that it would the City's intention that other users be given the opportunity to use the park. She believed that the overall `community' demand warrants the need to open up the park to more users. Westerlund asked how much space would be added to the park for the dog park. Schmitz stated that the Park would hope to add another mile of trails within the approximately 15 acres designated for the dog park. He pointed out that people who are uncomfortable around dogs, such as families with small children, tend to avoid the 80 acres of back trails where dogs are free to roam. Schmitz stated that the proposed 15 acres, the dog park would be the third largest dog park in the metro area. As a dog owner, Davis stated that her concern would be that someday dogs might be banned from the park; therefore, owners should do all that they can to retain as much real estate of the park for dogs today as possible. Patty Feeney, 5630 Christmas Lake Point - Shorewood resident, stated that she visited the park this morning with her grandson in a stroller and her dog. She stated that this park is a very special park and different than any other park in the system and it would be her desire to walk the entire park area and not just be limited to 15 acres. As a responsible pet owner, her proposal would be to require pet owners to pay a bit more to use the entire park for their use, and let them decide when to put their pets on a leash. Young commented that this attitude sounds very idealistic, when the papers all the time site many irresponsible dog owners who don't leash their pets when others are around and this leads to problems. Julie Eisraney, frequent visitor of Lake Minnewashta Regional Park who trains hunting dogs, stated that she has never had an incident at the park in the past 25 years, but was given a ticket this summer r - �+ I - ..; ,. I--- A-- 1- -I,-A .,r +l,o ,-, ,1L UT],. ol - 1 - 1 +1- i„rl rtP -Ar ra clip rniilrl an Aanth liPr nat lul not 110.ving 1161 1106 WaJIWU UL Lill. P=. yr -1- .iii... aaa — -, x- I . — -.v ..+........ b" I -- -- I— to let him run, the judge suggested she try to change the law. Since June, Eisraney indicated that this is what she has been attempting to do. Westerlund questioned how changing the law to a leash or off leash law was relevant to the City of Shorewood voting to support the dog park. Eisraney stated that she would leave a copy of her proposed changes for review and suggested that the park consider instigating a permit for use of the park. Young asked if the leash law was a safety issue. • Schmitz stated that dogs are not allowed to roam unrestricted without leashes; therefore, this supports the need for the dog park. PARK COMMISSION MINUTES "TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 28, 2004 PAGE 5 OF 8 . 6. CONCESSION STAND REPORTS AND OPERATIONS FOR 2005 Brown reviewed the sales information provided by Scott Qualle, Freeman Park concessionaire, noting that the report was incomplete due to Qualle's computer crashing. Young asked why many dates were excluded from the report and how the initial figures compared to the sales of the previous year. Brown stated that the date exceptions were due to rainouts. In contrast to last year, Brown indicated that the concessions had sold approximately $11,000 worth of goods last year. Westerlund suggested that staff compile more information to compare the two years and report back at a future meeting. Brown indicated that he had asked Qualle whether he might have any initial interest in running the concessions the next year, to which he replied he would. 7. DISCUSS GOALS, PRIORITIES AND WORK PROGRAM Brown reviewed the 2004 Shorewood Park Commission Goals and the 8 additional items that the Commission wished to see added to the list. Brown asked for feedback from the Commission regarding the priority these items should be addressed in. Westerlund stated that she would support immediate consideration of a park signage discussion, followed by examination of a larger issue like water quality. Davis noted that many of the goals and issues could be separated into several categories; first, some fall under the big items such as drainage, horticulture, and trees in our parks; others consist of immediate issues like buckthorn control, signage, and vandalism that would provide more `instant gratification' if resolved; and finally, further educational efforts or programs in our parks should be investigated. She felt the Commission should try to pick one big item to try to accomplish over the next year, as well as, addressing the smaller instant gratification items. Since it is extremely visible, Wagner believed that park signage should be the first issue addressed by the Commission, followed by the vandalism issue, and finally the larger issues such as water quality and managing wetland and water in our parks. Meyer felt the water quality issue might involve a presentation from an educated source. Famiok stated that several of the items are short term `clean up' items, such as reviewing the concession operation numbers and signage; whereas, other items meet the long term items to work on. She pointed out that the educational piece should come first, before the Commission tries to • tackle some of the big items. Brown indicated that he had a general direction of how to proceed, including signage, vandalism, concession numbers, and a water quality presentation. PARK COMMISSION MINUTES TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 28, 2004 PAGE 6 OF 8 8. DETERMINE INVOLVEMENT WITH MN REC AND THE COMMISSION DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM • Davis stated that she would love to invite a wetland expert or DNR representative to a Commission meeting to discuss water quality and some of the other items on the goals list. She asked Brown and the Commission whether they felt they were getting their money's worth via membership of the Mn Recreation and Parks Association. As mentioned in his memo, Brown stated that the initial first annual Commission Development Program was somewhat successful; however, more time might have been useful for the Cities to share ideas. Although members for just one year, Young stated that the association still appears to be a rich resource for the Commission and went virtually untapped by the Commission last year. He believed that it might be worthwhile to renew the membership for a second year as they might have access to some of the liaisons or expertise we'd like to pursue in some of the issues we are dealing with. He suggested the Commission revisit the membership next year if they have not proven their value to draw our support. Meyer concurred, stating that it was likely the Commission's own fault that it failed to use them as a resource, since they have been very responsive to our needs. Davis suggested staff invite representatives of the Association to make a presentation to the . Commission as to their ability to assist the City with its list of goals and issues over the next year. 9. DISCUSS SIGNS FOR THE PARK This item was incorporated into the goals item #7 and would be addressed at a later date. 10. REVIEW OF THE 2004 AND 2005 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CIP) A. Review Schedule of Improvements Brown reviewed the CIP for the 2003 Park Fund from Park Dedication Fees which equaled roughly $86,902, with an additional $27,900 in park dedication fees in 2004, for a balance of $114,800. He pointed out that an additional $33,000 was anticipated from the Barrington development. While fewer and fewer lot splits will continue to occur, Brown encouraged the Commission to spend its budget wisely. On the up side, Brown pointed out that when the levy limits were backed off recently, the Council, spearheaded by Council member Zerby, reacted to this by reinstating the $10,000 for general park improvements back into the budget each year. Wagner questioned what sort of balance in its contingency account the City expected to keep in their Park improvements account. Brown stated that $20,000 had been earmarked for the skate park equipment, thus leaving an account balance in excess of $80,000. In recognition of the Public Works Department, Brown pointed out that the trail around the north end of Freeman Park was over 2/3 complete as of today, and was coming in under budget. PARK COMMISSION MINUTES "TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 28, 2004 PAGE 7 OF 8 Meyer asked whether the City Council would be helping to offset expenditures for the Minnewashta dog park if the Park Commission made a recommendation for this investment or whether the Park fund would be used to offset that expenditure. Brown stated that, as a staff member, he would assume that this expenditure would likely come out of the CIP plan for the Park Commission. Zerby indicated that it would be a much easier sell to the City Council if the Commission was straightforward with the Council and said the Commission found additional money in the Park budget and would like to use a portion of it for the dog park. While he felt the dog park was a good idea, he commented that he had not seen a ground swell of support to warrant the Council paying for it. Wagner asked what action the Park Commission was expected to take this evening with regard to the dog park. He indicated that he thought it set a bad precedent to support City's contributing to County parks and asked if this was common practice to contribute to County Parks. Brown stated that the Commission was under no obligation to make any commitment to the dog park this evening, and based on the comments from the public, he believed more consideration must be given to the subject. • Meyer pointed out that consideration of a dog park was one of the Commission's identified priorities for several years. With the Carmichael development, Brown noted that water service would be brought along Highway 7 and staff would be demanding that service be provided for the skate park as well. B. Accept Proposal for Southshore Community Park Brown shared the recommendations by Tim Hughes and the quotes supplied by Ramptech and True Rides for upgrading the skate park equipment. He explained that it would be his recommendation that the surface be repaired; the existing equipment would remain, with the addition of a 4' high ramp and quarter pipe, as well as, resheeting the existing equipment. Davis agreed that the upgrades were necessary and the addition of the first two items acceptable; however, she was hesitant to invest a great deal more without knowing whether the trend was waning. Meyer pointed out that the investment for the first two items would be approximately $5,300, with additional shipping and handling. Westerlund moved, Wagner seconded, to approve the top two items of the Ramptech bid which . include the 4' Quarter pipe and 4' Bank Ramp, with the addition of shipping and handling charges as staff deems reasonable. Motion passed 6/0. PARK COMMISSION MINUTES TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 28, 2004 PAGE 8 OF 8 11. NEW BUSINESS 0 Davis suggested that staff obtain pictures of the current signs for discussion of the signage issue for upcoming meetings. Meyer concurred, urging Commissioners to visit various parks to view the signs prior to the discussion. As a review of the Park Plaza design, Davis reported that the landscape architect had rearranged the tree placement slightly and access walk. Brown reported that, while the City Council approved the plans moving forward for the plaza, the Foundation was reminded that no construction will take place until the funds were in an escrow account with the city or letter of credit filed. Westerlund voiced concern regarding the potential for cut through traffic from the corner of Eddy Station to the corner of the plaza without additional plantings. She also suggested that the use of native plants be encouraged. Having visited the site, Famiok felt the cut - through traffic would not be as big a concern as one might first think. Brown stated that he would bring the Commission's suggestions back to the landscape architect for insertion into the plans. Davis requested that the November meeting be moved to an alternate date, since neither she nor Gilbertson would be available to attend. After discussion, the Commission agreed to hold the meeting on November 3, 2004. Council Meetings: October 11:Davis October 25: Westerlund 12. ADJOURNMENT Meyer moved, Westerlund seconded, adjourning the Park Commission Meeting of September 28, 2004. Motion passed 6/0. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, Kristi B. Anderson Recording Secretary is 0 Memorandum To: Park Commission From: Twila Grout, Park Secretary Date: 10/28/2004 Re: Agenda Item #4 - MN Park and Recreation Michelle Synder from MN Park and Recreation will be present at the Park Commission meeting on Tuesday, November 3, 2004. Listed below are suggestions that the Park Commission would like to discuss with Michelle at the meeting. 1. The Park Commissions focus areas for 2005 (water quality, signage, vandalism) - Does the MN Park and Rec have any information they can share with the commissioners regarding these items. 2. Insight on what the MN Park and Rec sees in the future for the park systems that may be helpful to the Park Commission. 3. Trends in program development -low cost or cost - effective programs that bring the people out. 4. Raising (BIG) money through the grant process to develop and/or enhance the parks. 5. Trends in park renovation and development (there have been articles in major journals and on the internet on the move away from organized sports). 6. Nature /horticulture /preservation - trends, activities, priorities, who done anything. 0 rM10 • community rec. resources Date: 6/31/04 To: Larry Brown, Park Commission, Honorable Mayor, and City Council CC: Administrator Dawson From: Kristi Anderson and Sally Keefe RE: 2004 Second Quarter Report from Community Rec. Resources Attached is the report of activities from Community Rec. Resources summarizing activities and challenges in its role as Park Coordinator for the City of Shorewood for the third quarter of 2004. Monitoring and communication between City Staff, CRR, and Sports organizations provided the highlights for the third quarter. Again, CRR suggests consideration be given to clearly stating expectations and enforcement of policy related to timeliness of document and fee submission. Should you have any further questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact Community Rec. Resources principals, Kristi Anderson or Sally Keefe. As always, we appreciate the continued support of City Staff and Council. Kristi Anderson and Sally Keefe Community Rec. Resources • I community rec. resources Date: 9/30/04 To: Larry Brown, Park Commission, Honorable Mayor, and City Council CC: Administrator Dawson From: Kristi Anderson and Sally Keefe, Community Rec. Resources RE: Quarterly Report of activities from July 1, 2004 to September 30, 2004 Similar to the first half of 2004, Park Coordinator services for third quarter activities brought with them their own set of unique circumstances. Communication continued to be a main component, as was monitoring of the fall park utilization. While use decreased over the latter part of the quarter, many sports organizations and passive users were able to utilize the park system and take advantage of the beautiful fall weather conditions. • The spring /summer sporting season quietly drew to a close in mid -July. Overall field • use was directed by the schedule with little deviation from the designated blocks of time requested. The number of users remained fairly consistent for the spring season, with one organization requesting reimbursement from the City. No tournament applications were received by the City, and fields remained quiet for all park users into mid- August. CRR would also like to compliment the City's Public Works Department in maintaining excellent fields throughout the year's sporting seasons. Issues of concerns raised by the sporting organizations were received and dealt with in an effective manner, and despite the wet spring weather, the overall field conditions were excellent for baseball and soccer at season end. Monitoring of the park system found diminished use of the parks overall as a result of the "break" in field use with a slight increase in passive use. CRR Staff members had the pleasure of observing the Paul Cherba Jazz Quartet as part of the Music in the Park event held on August 13, 2004. Attendance was light at this event, but was quite enjoyable for all ages. CRR Staff has also utilized the Freeman Park trail system in the wooded area of the park, and would like to compliment the City on its efforts to enhance this area through the Wetland Restoration project slated in the near future. Fall schedules were released to South Tonka Little League, Tonka Babe Ruth, and the Tonka Football Association for field use beginning August 14, 2004. As per the process, final schedules were released with the understanding that rosters and user fees would be received by the City from all teams prior to field use dates specified in the documentation submitted by each organization. Sadly, this was not the case for any of the teams. Complete rosters and collection of user fees provided the impetus for repeated communications to each sports organization throughout the season, with final completed documentation received from one team as late as September 14, 2004 (approximately one month after the beginning of the season). Once again, CRR. recommends specific direct verbiage be inserted into the Park Priority Policy detailing the need for timely completion and submission of documentation. With the beginning of the fall season, Badger Park saw increased use, both on the football field and the tennis courts. CRR is happy to report monitoring events of that park yielded no parking problems as in recent years. CRR Staff also spoke with representatives of the Southshore Senior Community Center in mid - season, whom also reported the parking situation was much improved over previous recent years. This may also be attributed to the fact that there were few evening events scheduled at the Center during the season as well. As the fall sporting season draws to a close, CRR anticipates meeting with City Staff to discuss potential changes to the documentation collection process for spring 2004 use, as well as proposed verbiage for consideration of implementation within the Park Priority Policy regarding the data collection process. As always, CRR appreciates the continued support of City Staff and Council in providing Park Coordinator services to the City. 2 • community rec. resources Date: 10/28/04 To: Larry Brown, Park Commission, Honorable Mayor, and City Council CC: Administrator Dawson From: Kristi Anderson and Sally Keefe RE: Proposed Draft Language for Revision to Park Priority Policy As you are aware, Community Rec. Resources (CRR) has had the pleasure of working with City Staff, Commissions, and Council over the past two years. In that time, CRR has made several suggestions regarding necessary language changes to the Park Priority Policy believed to enhance park usage as well as clarify and strengthen the process utilized by CRR • and City Staff in securing appropriate documentation from park users prior to allocating field space. To that end, CRR Staff is submitting a potential draft revision of the Park Priority Policy for discussion and consideration. Sally Keefe will be present at the November 3, 2004, Park Commission Meeting to discuss the proposed revisions in detail. Should you have any questions regarding this proposed draft revision of the Park Priority Policy, prior to the November 3, 2004 Park Commission Meeting, please do not hesitate to contact CRR Staff member Sally Keefe at 952.471.1109. Thank you in advance for your consideration and comments. Your efforts are greatly appreciated. Community Rec. Resources Kristi Anderson and Sally Keefe is City of Shorewood Park Priority Policies The City of Shorewood is very proud of its parks system and works enthusiastically to maintain and enhance park properties. To that end, the City utilizes a number of policies to help to guide implementation of park goals, directives, and ordinances regulating park usage for all residents. The intent of this policy is to grant all users the opportunity to utilize facilities within a managed and predictable manner, thereby allowing all residents an optimum park usage experience. 1. DEFINITIONS The Park Priority Policies utilize a number of definitions for clarity to allow objective use by all park users. Following is a list of definitions found throughout the Park Priority Policies. Designated Representative: Each organization or group requesting priority field or facility use, shall designate and file with the Park Coordinator the name, address, and contact information of the individual who shall serve as the sole contact for the City of Shorewood. This individual shall serve as the liaison for all matters between the City of Shorewood and the sports organization or group requesting field use. • Facility Use Equation: An equation which assists the Park Coordinator in allocating facility use for organized sporting events. This equation (described further in this document) sets forth the maximum allocation of facility time available to each organization for all athletic events. • Non - Organized Activity /Users /Events: Users of the parks or facilities outside of any connection with the sports organizations, such as school groups, family reunions, etc.bLiSinesseS? Nonprofit Organization: An organization that meets the requirements of Minnesota State Statutes as a Public Service Group and is defined as a group organized to provide a public service to the entire community for all individuals in the community within the age group being served. Organized Activity /Users /Events: Any activity or event whose participants are part of a sports organization or wou d this itichide school organized activity 1 il�c tennis, cross coutitTy` ?`> Preseason Coordination Meeting: A meeting, hosted by the City of Shorewood, prior to the anticipated seasons of activities between the City Staff, City of Shorewood Park Coordinator, and, sports organizations, nonprofit groups and non - organized groups who are requesting dedicated use of facilities. The purpose of this meeting is to outline polices and regulations for requests and scheduled use of the facilities, and to address questions, concerns, or issues associated with field use or schedules. All organizations or groups requesting dedicated facility usage shall have a representative at the preseason Coordination meeting. Failure of a representative to attend this meeting shall result in loss of dedicated field time for the entire season. It is anticipated that Preseason Coordination meetings will be conducted as follows: ♦ Spring and Summer Events: Sometime between December and March preceding the spring sporting season ♦ Fall and Winter Events: Sometime between May through July preceding the fall sporting season ♦ Other preseason coordination meetings may be conducted, should event schedules dictate. Sports Organization: An Organization registered with the City of Shorewood Park and Recreation Coordinator and has successfully filed with the City of Shorewood a copy of the bylaws with which they are governed, appropriate certificates of insurance, fees, and team rosters, prior to any field use. Tournament Permit: Permit required for all activities involving a succession of activities falling within a defined period outside of the normal game or practice times allocated for the organization. 2. CATEGORIZATION OF FACILITIES The City of Shorewood owns and operates athletic, non athletic, and passive use type facilities. To assist with the administration of these facilities, each one has been placed in a category shown below. i Category 1 Facilities: Athletic Facilities Little League ball diamonds Babe Ruth ball diamonds Softball diamonds Soccer fields Football fields Hockey rinks Free skating rinks Tennis courts Volleyball courts Skate park facilities Category 2 Facilities: Non Athletic Facilities Park Shelters and Multi -Use Buildings Playgrounds City of Shorewood Parking Lots Category 3 Facilities: Passive Use IS Open Park Space for events Trails ? ? ?? P 3. AVAILABILITY OF FACILITIES Facility Description Available From To Softball Fields April 1 August 31 Babe Ruth Field April 1 August 31 Little League Fields April 1 August 31 Soccer Fields April 1 October 20 Football Fields August 1 October 31 Hockey Rinks December 20 February 15 Free Skating Rinks December 20 February 15 Open Spaces Year Round Year Round Playgrounds April 1 October 31 Skate Parks May 1 October 31 Park Shelters Year Round Year Round Volleyball Courts May 1 October 31 Tennis Courts May 1 October 31 Parking Lots Year Round Year Round Shouldn't this availability schedule be adjusted to reflect actual usage? Or should the schedules for the sports orgs reflect the availability of this table? For instance, TBR used the fields until 10/16, STLL until 10/3, etc. I agree the :schedule should be reflective of actual usa ge. 4. PRIORITIZATION OF FACILITY USE REQUESTS As stated, the intent of this policy is to grant all users the opportunity to utilize facilities within a managed and predictable manner. Facility allocations shall be evaluated first by the type of request (or need) received, in. accordance to the "Category of Facility" outlined previously within this document, and then by the prioritization schedule listed below Prioritization for Category 1 Facilities: Note: Throughout the priority schedule, regularly scheduled activities shall take precedence over scheduled tournament activities. ♦ Priority 1: Field resting time ♦ Priority 2: Non - organized activities and organized activities within the predetermined time allocations. 0 • ♦ Priority 3: School District 276 Programs (examples curriculum programs, interscholastic • team practices, etc.) ♦ Priority 4: Non profit Organizations located within the South Lake Minnetonka 3 Communities ♦ Priority 5: Business or service organizations located within the South Lake Minnetonka • Communities ♦ Priority 6: All other requests falling outside of priorities 1 -5 defined above shall be considered by forinal request. Prioritization for Category 2 and 3 Facilities: ♦ Priority 1: Resident request on first come first served basis ♦ Priority 2: Organized activity previously registered with the City of Shorewood Park Coordinator. ♦ Priority 3: Non - resident request on a first come first served basis. 5. MAXIMUM FACILITY USE EQUATION The intent of this equation is to provide allocations of time for Category 1 facilities in a uniform and nondiscriminatory manner. Therefore, the City of Shorewood has compiled an equation to determine the maximum time that is to be allocated to any organization for initial facility assignments for seasonal use. The maximum number of initial Facility Time Periods (MTPs) available to any team is based upon the following equation. Variables: Equation: P = Average Number Kids Per Team in Organization T = Total Pop. Vying for Field Use TS = Time Slots MTP = ( FITS per Wk)( #of Teams in Org) T While using the Maximum Facility Use Equation as a starting point, the Park Coordinator has the authority to increase the MTP for any one organization, providing that a separate organization has indicated that an equivalent amount of their allocated time is not going to be utilized. This equation is based upon the following assumptions: ♦ All turf areas are to be "rested" the equivalent of one day per week. is ♦ Facility Time Periods are based upon 1.5 -hour time periods. ♦ Times may be further limited based upon the occurrence of limited parking or other facility demands. ». ♦ The Maximum Facility Use Equation will arrive at a decimal equivalent as to the maximum time allotted per activity. The final maximum time slots shall be rounded down. ♦ The Maximum Facility Use Equation is evaluated "Per Activity." The Park Coordinator has the • authority to adjust scheduling based upon compatibility between two events occurring simultaneously, or other facility limitations. 6. Process for Requesting Field Use for Each Season The City of Shorewood welcomes all persons interested in utilizing park space and/or field usage. In order to establish an objective non - discriminatory manner in which all parties interested in using the City's parks can be facilitated, it is important to follow the listed procedures below. 1. Contact the City of Shorewood City Hall, Park Secretary at 952.474.3236. 2. Depending on group needs and at the direction of the City Hall Staff, contact the Park Coordinator. For the 2004 -2005 Sporting Seasons, contact Kristi Anderson or Sally Keefe of Community Rec. Resources at 612.743.4124, for further information regarding documentation needed by the City prior to field usage of any kind. 3. If group is classified as organized activity or sports organization, turn in the following requested documentation prior to any park usage: • Certificate of insurance for the year the organization is wishing to utilize park space Facility Use Agreement • Memorandum Agreement If group is a sports organization the following additional information must also be submitted to the City prior to field usage of an kid: • Complete rosters of all participants within the organization utilizing City park facilities • Sports Data Sheet • User fees in full Should the requested documentation not be made available to Community Rec. Resources prior to the designated deadline for completion, absolutely no field usage shall take place until such time as completed documentation has been received and approved by Community Rec. Resources Staff, and written notification of approval received by the applicant. 4. City Hall Staff or Community Rec. Resources Staff will notify applicant in writing of park usage times allotted for activity. Modifications to that allotted time may be made at the sole discretion of City Staff or Community Rec. Resources Staff at any time based on the Prioritization of Facility Use Requests section and in accordance with the Maximum Facility Use Equation, if applicable, as described earlier in this document. 5. Any questions regarding this process should be directed to Community Rec. Resources • Staff members Kristi Anderson or Sally Keefe at 612.743.4124. LM Think you in advance for making application to the City of Shorewood for park usage. The City of Shorewood wishes you all the best in maximizing your park experience! 0 rol • (:I "fY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD • SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 -8927 • (952) 474 -3236 FAX (952) 474 -0128 • www.ci.shorewood.mn.us • cityhaI1 @ci.shorewood.mn.us MEMORANDUM TO: Park Commission Craig Dawson, City Administrator FROM: Larry Brown, Director of Public Works DATE: October 29, 2004 RE: Discussion Regarding Off Leash Dog Park Carver County On September 28` 2004, Mr. Lenny Schmitz, of Carver County Parks, appeared before the Park Commission to gauge support from local cities for an off leash dog park in Lake Minnewashta Regional Park. During this meeting, a few residents chose to address the Park Commission, both in ® support of and in opposition for the project. It would appear that there are a group of individuals who oppose the project, since designation of a specific area would actually reduce the area available to them presently. Currently, it would appear that there are many who utilize the entire park as an off leash dog park. Conversely, support for such a project is high. The issue that is difficult to determine, at this time, is trying to gauge the numbers for support or opposition. Staff has tried to contact Mr. Schmitz to obtain data or feedback as to the magnitude of each group. Having not been able to reach Mr. Schmitz, Staff will report any feedback received at Tuesday's Park Commission meeting. Tuesday's meeting is an opportunity for Commissioners to discuss support or concerns for the project, and determine the next desired step in the process. 0 4111,® PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER , , r t 9 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD • SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 -8927 • (952) 474 -3236 FAX (952) 474 -0128 • www.ci.shorewood.mn.us • cityhaI1@ci.shorewood.mn.us • TO: FROM DATE: RE: Park Commission Larry Brown, Director of Public Works t October 29, 2004 Concession Stand Reports The Park Commission requested a more detailed report form the concessionaire of Eddy Station. Attached are the spreadsheets provided by the vendor for last season. 61m f ® ,® PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER Cash Repeipts by date t b ginning Cash Penns Beginnin g Cash 5/8/04 $125.00 5/9/04 $194.25 $0.05 5/10/04 $225.00 $0.05 5/11/04 $225.00 $0.10 5/12/04 $225.00 $0.15 5/13/04 $225.00 5/14/04 $225.00 $0.10 5/15/04 $225.00 5/16/04 $225.00 $0.19 Nickels $1.00 $1.00 $1.70 $1.70 $1.40 $1.25 $1.20 $1.80 $1.90 Dimes $1.00 $1.00 $2.50 $2,50 $2.00 $3.00 $1.70 $3.10 $3.90 Quarters $23.00 $19.25 $9.00 $41.75 $31.50 $19.50 $15.25 $18.00 $26.50 Halfs Dollars $1.00 $12.00 Total Change $25.00 $21.25 $13.25 $46.00 $36.00 $23.90 $18.15 $23.00 $0.00 $44.49 $1.00 $5.00 $10.00 $20.00 $50.00 $50.00 $73.00 $30.00 $10.00 $60.00 $102.00 $55.00 $10.00 $400.00 $79.00 $115.00 $70.00 $60.00 $143.00 $145.00 $70.00 $220.00 $71.00 $155.00 $90.00 $120.00 $48.00 $110.00 $30.00 $140.00 $115.00 $75.00 $60.00 $40.00 $225.00 $87.00 $185.00 $50.00 $280.00 $50.00 Checks $37.50 $15.00 Total Currency Total Cash $100.00 $125.00 $173.001 $194.251 $567.00 $580.25 $361.50 $407.50 $578.00 $614.00 $436.00 $459.90 $328.00 $346.15 $305.00 $328.00 $225.00 $225.00 $602.00 $646.49 Cash Receipts $69.25t_ $386.00 $182.50 $389.00 $234.90 $121.15 $103.00 $0.00 $421.49 Meal Deal Discounts $1.50 $0.50 Coupons Redeemed Treat Tix Sold $5.00 $0.00 $3.50 $65.00 $1.00 $37.50 $0.50 $126.25 $13.75 $27.50 $108.75 Treat Tix Redeemed $0.00 $41.25 $12.50 $92.50 $12.50 $25.00 $105.00 xpected Register Sales Actual Register Sales $64.25 $382.50 $181.50 $388.50 $234.90 $247.25 $0.15 $121.15 $120.25 $0.90 $103.00 $127.75 $0.25 $0.00 $0.00 $421.49 $527.75 -$1.26 Excess Cash for DeE2 $355.25 $182.50 $389.00 $234.90 $121.15 $103.00 $0.00 $421.49 Repay Starting Cash - $125.00 $230.25 $182.50 $389.00 $234.90 $121.15 $103.00 $0.00 $421.49 Number of Sales 141 62 69 313 Dollars per sale $1.75 $1.94 $1.85 $1.69 Non - taxable Sales $56.75 $22.25 $56.50 $191.75 Taxable Sales $190.50 $98.00 $71.75 $336.00 Voids Coupons Tax Due on Sales Net Sales after Tax 1 $11.26 $234.49 $5.82 $114.43 $4.15 $123.601 $0.00 $19.46 $508.29 • ginning Cash Penns 5/17/04 $225.00 5/18/04 $300.00 5/19/04 $300.00 $0.24 5/20/04 $300.00 5/24/04 $250.00 5/25/04 $250.00 5/26/04 $225.00 5/27/04 $225.00 5/28/04 $2.25.00 Nickels $0.65 $0.80 $0.95 $0.70 $0.30 $0.30 $0.75 Dimes $1.10 $1.70 $1.80 $0.80 $0.20 $0.20 $0.40 Quarters $29.75 $17.50 $27.50 $26.75 $22.25 $29.75 $15.50 $6.50 Halfs $0.50 Dollars $51.00 $57.00 $46.00 $81.00 $44.00 $25.00 Total Change $31.50 $71.50 $87.49 $74.25 $103.75 $74.25 $41.65 $0.00 $6.50 $1.00 $5.00 $97.00 $125,00 $110.00 $170.00 $104.00 $120.00 $68.00 $130.00 $73.00 $110.00 $116,00 $135.00 $104.00 $55.00 $225.00 $225.00 $10.00 $40.00 $70.00 $50.00 $50.00 $20.00 $90.00 $60.00 $20.00 $40.00 $280.00 $100.00 $140.00 $40.00 $140.00 $240.00 $50.00 $100.00 Checks Total Currency $302.00 $630.00 $374.00 $388.00 $243.00 $581.00 $459.00 $225.00 $225.00 Total Cash $333.50 $701.50 $461.49 $462.25 $346.75 $655.25 $500.65 $225.00 $231.50 Cash Receipts $108.50 $401.50 $161.49 $162.25 $96.75 $405.25 $275.65 $0.00 $6.50 Meal Deal Discounts $0.50 $2.50 $0.50 $1.00 Coupons Redeemed Treat Tix Sold $71.25 $11.25 $15.00 $118.75 $15.00 Treat Tix Redeemed $72.50 $11.25 $10.00 $78.75 $15.00 Expected Register Sales Actual Register Sales $108.50 $109.25 -$0.75 $401.50 $473.25 $0.75 $161.49 $172.75 -$0.01 $162.25 $171.75 $0.50 $96.75 $98.75 -$2.00 $405.25 $483.75 $0.25 $275.65 $291.00 -$0.35 $0.00 $0.00 $6.50 $6.50 $0.00 Excess Cash for Deposit $33.50 $401.50 $161.49 $212.25 $96.75 $430.25 $275.65 $0.00 $6.50 Repay Starting Cash $33.50 $401.50 $161.49 $212.25 $96.75 $430.25 $275.65 $0.00 $6.50 Number of Sales 72 251 1111 87 72 247 158 7 Dollars per sale $1.52 $1.89 $1.561 $1.97 $1.37 $1.96 $1.84 #DIV /0! $0.93 Non - taxable Sales Taxable Sales $25.25 $84.50 $180.00 $295.75 $49.75 $123.00 $50.75 $121.50 $15.50 $83.25 $200.75 $284.00 $89.00 $202.001 $1.50 $5.00 Voids Coupons Tax Due on Sales $4.95 $17.15 $7.191_ $7.13 $4.93 $16.52 $11.90 $0.28 Net Sales after Tax $104.30 $456.10 $165.561 $164.621 $93.82 $467.23 $279.10 $0.00 $6.22 0 ginning Cash Penns 5/29/04 $225.00 5/30/04 $225.00 5/31/04 $225.00 6/1/04 $225.00 6/2/04 $225.00 $0.12 6/3/04 $250.00 $0.04 6/4/04 $225.00 $0.05 6/5/04 $225.00 6/6/04 $225.00 6/7104 $225.00 Nickels $1.001 $0.90 $0.60 $0.60 $0.35 Dimes $2.90 $2.80 $2.10 $1.40 $0.20 Quarters $20.75 $31.00 $15.75 $4.50 $12.75 Halfs Dollars $10.00 $60.00 $37.00 $1.00 $34.00 Total Change $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $34.77 $94.74 $55.50 $0.00 $7.50 $47.30 $1.00 $117.00 $55.00 $78.00 $145.00 $80.00 $5.00 $225.00 $225.00 $225.00 $225.00 $115.00 $125.00 $100.00 $225.00 $130.00 $100.00 $10.00 $50.00 $50.00 1 $50.00 $20.00 $260,001 $200.00 $200.00 $540.00 $140.00 $50.00 Checks $7.25 $6.75 $10.00 Total Currency $225.00 $225.00 $225.00 $225.00 $549.25 $386.75 $428.00 $225.00 $825.00 $370.00 Total Cash $225.00 $225.00 $225.00 $225.00 $584.02 $481.49 $483.50 $225.00 $832.50 Cash Receipts $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $359.02 $231.49 $258.50 $0.00 $607.50 $192.30 Meal Deal Discounts Coupons Redeemed Treat Tix Sold $12.00 $1.25 $172.50 Treat Tix Redeemed $13.00 $2.50 $150.00 xpected Register Sales Actual Register Sales $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 1 $0.00 $359.02 $375.50 $231.49 $234.00 $258.50 $257.75 $0.00 $607.50 $755.25 $192.30 $191.00 $0.00 $0.001 $0.00 $0.00 -$3.48 -$0.01 $0.75 $0.00 $2.25 $1.30 Excess Cash for Deposit $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $439.02 $256.49 $258.50 $0.00 $607.50 $192.30 Repa Starting Cash $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $439.02 $256.49 $258.50 $0.00 $607.50 $192.30 Number of Sales 219 125 162 392 124 Dollars per sale #DIV /0! #DIV /0! #DIV /0! #DIV /0! $1.71 $1.87 $1.59 #DIV /0! $1.93 $1.54 Non - taxable Sales $102.50 $61.75 $63.25 $367.75 $48.75 Taxable Sales $273.00 $172.25 $194.50 $387.50 $142.25 Voids Coupons Tax Due on Sales $16.03 $10.15 $11.41 $22.41 $8.20 Net Sales after TaxI $0.00 $0.00 $0.001 $0.00 $359.47 $223.85 $246.341 $0.00 $732.84 $182.80 6/8/04 6/9/04 6/10/04 6/11 /04 6/12/04 6/13/04 6/14/04 6115/04 6/16104 ginning Cash $225.00 $225.00 $225.00 $225.00 $225.00 $225.00 $225.00 $225.00 $225.00 Penns $0.05 $0.05 1 $0.15 Nickels $0.40 $0.45 $1.60 $0.40 $0.50 $0.30 Dimes $1.30 $1.50 $4.10 $0.70 $4.50 $0.30 Quarters $15.00 $28.75 $18.75 $28.25 $11.75 $17.25 Halfs Dollars $26.00 $23.00 $25.00 $3.00 Total Change $42.75 $0.00 $53.75 $0.00 $0.00 $24.45 $54.50 $19.75 $17.85 $1.00 $159.00 $61.00 $158.00 $72.00 $141.00 $80.00 $5.00 $160.00 $225.00 $85.00 $225.00 $225.00 $120.00 $120.00 $185.00 $90.00 $10.00 $90.00 $30.00 $40.00 $30.00 $10.00 $40.00 $20.00 $80.00 $100.00 $300.00 $140.00 $360.00 $220.00 $50.00 $52.00 Checks $16.50 $46.25 Total Currency $557.50 $225.00 $276.00 $225.00 $225.00 $664.25 $362.00 $696.00 $430.00 Total Cash $600.25 $225.00 $329.75 $225.00 $225.00 $688.70 $416.50 $715.75 $447.85 Cash Receipts $375.25 $0.00 $104.75 $0.00 $0.00 $463.70 $191.50 $490.75 $222.85 Meal Deal Discounts Coupons Redeemed Treat Tix Sold $65.00 $112.501 $100.00 $15.00 Treat Tix Redeemed $71.25 $115.001 $1.25 $101.25 $15.00 Expected Register Sales Actual Register Sales $375.25 $433.25 $0.00 $104.75 $104.75 $0.00 $0.00 $463.70 $579.50 $191.50 $192.75 $490.75 $586.00 $222.85 $238.00 $13.25 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 -$0.80 $0.00 $6.00 -$0.15 Excess Cash for Deposit $375.25 $0.00 $104.75 $0.00 $0.00 $463.70 $191.501 $490.751_ $222.85 Repay Starting Cash $375.25 $6.661 $1 04.75 $0.00 $0.00 $463.70 $191.501 $490.75 $222.85 Number of Sales 242 51 301 110 313 125 Dollars per sale $1.79 #DIV /0! $2.05 #DIV /0! #DIV /0! $1.93 $1.75 $1.87 $1.90 Non - taxable Sales $150.50 $20.75 $242.50 $45.00 $230.00 $67.00 Taxable Sales $282.75 $84.00 $337.00 $147.75 $356.00 $171.00 Voids Coupons Tax Due on Sales $16.46 $4.98 $19.60 $8.71 $20.74 $10.0 Net Sales after Tax $416.791 $0.00 $99.77 $0.00 $0.00 $559.90 $184.04 $565.261 $227.98 0 6/17/04 6/18/04 6/19/04 6/20/04 6/21 /04 6/22/04 6/23/04 6/24/04 6/25/04 6/26/04 ginning Cash $225.00 $225.00 $225.00 $275.00 $225.00 $275.00 $225.00 $225.00 $225.00 $225.00 Penns $0.031 $0.05 $0.30 Nickels $0.70 $0.60 $0.85 $1.45 $0.35 $0.30 $0.55 Dimes $1.20 $1.00 $2.60 $160 $1.80 $1.20 $1.20 Quarters $19.25 $34.25 $31.25 $21.25 $18.25 $7.75 $19.00 Halfs Dollars $22.00 $62.001 $23.00 $51.00 $53.00 $23.00 $14.00 Total Change $43.15 $97.881 $0.00 $57.75 $77.60 $73.40 $32.25 $34.75 $0.001 $0.00 $1.00 $107.00 $22.00 $165.00 $68.00 $139.00 $158.00 $75.00 $5.00 $135.00 $80.00 $225.00 $135.00 $105.00 $120.00 $130.00 $115.00 $225.00 $225.00 $10.00 $30.00 $30.00 $10.00 $110.00 $80.00 $60.00 $20.00 $160.00 $60.00 $300.00 $100.00 $160.00 $160.00 $100.00 $50.00 $50.00 $2.00 Checks $4.50 $25.00 $13.75 $5.75 Total Currency $402.00 $196.50 $225.00 $705.00 $283.00 $544.75 $528.00 $355.75 $225.00 $225.00 Total Cash $445.15 $294.38 $225.00 $762.75 $360.60 $618.15 $560.25 $390.50 $225.00 $225.00 Cash Receipts $220.15 $69.38 $0.00 $487.75 $135.60 $343.15 $335.25 $165.50 $0.00 $0.00 Meal Deal Discounts Coupons Redeemed Treat Tix Sold $128.75 $0.00 $63.75 $16.25 Treat Tix Redeemed $130.00 $0.00 $67.50 $16.25 xpected Register Sales $220.15 $69.38 $0.00 $487.75 $135.60 $343.15 $335.25 $165.50 $0.00 $0.00 Actual Register Sales $218.50 $69.25 $617.00 $135.50 $394.86 $349.75 $164.50 $1.65 $0.13 $0.00 $0.75 $0.10 $15.79 $1.75 $1.00 $0.00 $0.00 Excess Cash for Deposit $220.15 $69.38 - $50.00 $537.75 $85.60 $393.15 $335.25 $165.50 $0.00 $0.00 Re Starting Cash $220.15 $69.38 - $50.00 $537.75 $85.60 $393.15 $335.25 $165.50 $0.00 $0.00 Number of Sales 128 39 333 82 225 187 99 Dollars per sale $1.71 $1.78 #DIV /0! $1.85 $1.65 $1.75 $1.87 $1.66 #DIV /0! #DIV /0! Non - taxable Sales $73.25 $15.50 $246.75 $29.75 $162.25 $76.25 $56.50 Taxable Sales $145.25 $53.75 $370.25 $105.75 $247.001 $273.50 $108.00 Voids 1 1 Coupons Tax Due on Sales $8.51 $3.17 $21.55 $6.21 $14.39 $16.06 $6.34 Net Sales after Tax $209.99 $66.08 $0.00 $595.45 $129.29 $394.86 $333.69 $158.16 $0.00 t $0.00 1 1 - 0 7/04 6/28/04 6/29/04 6/30/04 7/1/04 25.00 $225.00 $192.55 $160.00 $145.00 $0.94 $0.10 $1.30 $0.30 $0.70 $1.45 $2.10 $1.60 $3.80 $2.80 $34.25 $13.75 $25.00 $22.50 $33.00 $9.00 $2.00 $0.00 $71.59 $15.65 $38.50 $28.85 $91.00 $64.00 $4.00 $48.00 $225.00 $150.00 $120.00 $100.00 $120.00 $60.00 $10.00 $40.00 $50.00 $40.00 TI 40.00 $260.00 $120.00 $225.00 $341.00 $334.00 $404.00 $338.00 $225.00 $412.59 $349.65 $442.50 $366.85 $0.00 $187.59 $157.10 $282.50 $221.85 $9,628.61 $1,297.00 $1,159.25 $137.75 $0.00 $187.59 $157.10 $282.50 $221.85 $187.00 $157.00 $282.50 $220.25 $9,573.86 $0.00 $0.59 $0.10 $0.00 $1.60 $0.00 $220.04 $204.65 $297.50 $366.85 $0.00 $220.04 $204.65 $297.50 $366.85 121 85 162 135 #DIV /0! $1.55 $1.85 $1.74 $1.63 $45.50 $53.25 $55.00 $79.25 $3,232.75 $141.50 $103.75 $227.50 $141.00 $6,360.501 $9,593.25 $8.33 $6.11 $13.39 $8.24 $371.75 $0.00 $178.67 $150.89 $269.11 $212.01 $9,215.00 0 Page 1 Register Co de Categor Item I AvWeekly # weeks (by r%vg Sold Sales Remainin Candy 1 00 ML 3 9_ l C andy _13 1 01 A ir H _ 11 r 37 - - - _ Ga - - - - -- - - - _ 1 23 :, 0. 05 Ca nd y y Ca 1 0 3 ;Al ms 104 Blow — 2 8 6 j _ 2 16.00 24 0.25 Can Can - _ 105 j -- 10 6 Kit K TL affy 2 8� _ -- 4 95 0.23 - _ _ Candy _ M &N - -- 3 - 9 1.81 _107 108M &N 2 7 - - Candy C andy 109 Mi lky 3 9 __- - Candy j ;Pixy 6 Can dy Candy _11 111 112 r Pusi - Red -- _3 5 2 15 _ 4 0.48 - C Cand Candy Candy 113 1 11 R ee: Ring Sal tc _ 3 9 (0.1 8 3 0.40 2 6 0.18 - 6 j - - - - 26_ - -- 0.08 Ca ndy 117 ISni 3 13 - Candy -� - -- 118Sour 5 20 ^_ 0_30 Candy 119 S 3 9 I 0. 47_ Candy 1 2 0 Toot: 5 ; 13 1.0 4_ Cand Candy -- Candy 1TWi 122 1 123 - Nerd [ (o c 4 - 3 2 _- 12 7.49 - -- 12 0.08 6 - - -- - - - - - Candy Cand � y 1 125 Bub t - -- 4 � 7 � - - _ -- Air H 4 5 1 .56 Drinks, Cold ! 2 jAppl - -- 1 - - -- -- 3 1.14 Drin Cold 202 iCo - - 2 1 5 j 10.73 Dr inks, Cold 203 CokE 2 _ _ 8 1 8.63 Drinks, Cold 1 - _2_04_ Diet _ 6 26 1.18 Dr inks, Cold Drinks, Cold 205 206 Diet Fra 3 2 11 3 2.91 2.67 Drinks, Cold Drinks, Co ld Drinks, Col 20 208 209 Ga tc Gatc Gato 3_ 2 4 12 0.17 9 - 15 0.14 Drinks, Cold - 10 Grak 2 3 l i 0.35 Drinks, Cold 211 '; N 17 _ 77 (0.19) Drinks, Cold old 212 — Iced --- - 1 4 8.77 Drinks, Cold 213 Lemr 2 7�__ 3. 2_5 Drinks, Cold 214 Moui - 3 1 11 ; 9.98 Drinks, Cold ! 215 Orar 1 1 19. 43 Drinks, Cold 216 PepE - 2 �_ 7 9. Dri nks, Cold Drinks, Cold 217 218 - Pro ; Pro __ 2 6 � 6 Cold 219 TSpor Prop 2 6 _D rinks, Drinks, Cold 2 - -_ 1 j 2 2 - -_ Drinks, Cold 221 _ ISpor_ 1 Drinks, Cold �_ 222 `Spor 2 � 2 - Drinks, Col i_ 22 3 Spar — 2 ! 2 - Drinks, C old —,---_--------- 224 Sprit 1 1 1 4.94 Drinks, Cold j 225 ianV 2 _ _ 3 5. 44 Drinks Cold ! Drinks, Cold 2 227 SFC 1 1 2 2629 Dr. F 3 6 7.06 Drinks, Cold 228 Diet 2 3 8.70 0 • 9 Master Tally Sheet2004 Category Register Code Item Description (by name, within category) J Item Price Case! at Item Cost, Orig Qty, Cumulative Purchases Totals Inventory Sold' re _ tail va lue Inventory _ Value; Cumulativei Sales Avg Weekly # weeks Max Sold Avg Sold Sales (Remaining Candy 100 3 Musketeers $0.75; 36 $0.347 36 71 71 $0.00 _ $0.0 $53.25 7 1 3 j 9 , - Candy Candy _ 101 102 Air Hea E xtreme _ Air Head $0.50 $0.25 50 90 j $0.137] $0.076' 50 I_ 90 299 _ 990 1 299 $0.00 984 $1.50 $0.00 $0.461 $1 49.50 $246.001 __ 37 j 11 _ 37 - 101 1 28 123 0.05 Candy 10 3 Almond J $0.751 36 $0.341 36 36 121 $18.00 $8.191 $9.00 �_ 1 2 16.00 Ca nd y 1 04 _ Blow Pops _ -_ $� 100 '1 $0.065, 1 200 ! 194 1 $ 1.50 1 $0.39 $48.50 22 ; _ 6 0 24 0.25 6 ?_ 2 4 0.23 Candy Candy 10 5 106 Kit Kat Laffy Taff 3 for_$_25) y ( I $0. 75 $0.2 �- 36 165 I $0. 341 $0.0301_ 3 6 330_x_ _ 36 76 35 $0.75` 762 $0.00 $0.34 $0.00 $26.251 $190.50 _ 3 3 � $ 95 - _ -_� Candy - -- 1 07 _ M &M (plain $0 .751 48 $0.3 48 92 j 7 $12.75i $5.841 $56.25 6 3 9 1 1.8 - C andy 108 _ __ M &M's (peanut) $0.751 , 48 i 1 $ 0.344 _ 48 ' 52 52 $0.00 ! $0. 00 I $39.00 $54.75 _ 5 2 7 _ - -- F77 3 9 _ Candy 109 Milky Way $0.751 36 $0. 36 73 7 3 1 $0.00��$OAO - _ = 6 Candy Candy Can dy 11 0 1 111 ::Push 11 C Pixy S tix Pops _ _ Red Vin $0175 $0.75 $0.751 50 24 30 $0.1831 $0.299! $0.271 50 - 30 5 _ 124 30 50 $0.001 117 _ $5.25 30 $0.00 $0.00 $2.09 $0.00. $37.50 $87.75 $22.50 9 _ 3 l 22 5 L 15 j 0.48 4 _ 2 j 4 - Candy 1 113 Reeses Peanut Butter Cups $0.75 36 $0.341, 36 72 73 - $0.75' -$0.34 $54.75 6 _ 3 9 (0.11 22 8 33 0.40 Candy Candy 114 1 115 1 Ring Pops _- Salted Nut Roll $0.75' $0.75 40 24 $0.225 $0.315 80 24 2 75 46 j 262 , $9.75 45 1 $0. $2.92 $0.31 $196.50 $33.75 _ 7 2� _ 6 _ 0.18 1 Candy Ca ndy Cand 1 117_ 118 Skittles ,Snickers Sour Skittles $0.75 $0.751 $ 0.75 1 36 ( 48 24 $0.344 $0.344 $0.345 36 48 24 212 1 1 1 68 21 0 1 $1.50 100 �__ $0.00 162 $4. $0.69' $0.00 $2.07 $157.501 $75.00 $121.50 18 26 0.08 11 _ 3 13 - 1 5_ 20 0.30 Candy C 119 1 Starburs Tootsie R olls $0.75 $0.251 36 1 20 $0.3441 $0 .0621 36 240 72 113 68 , $3.00 100 $ 3.251 $1. 38 $0.81 $51.00 $25.00 5 _ 3 9 I _ 0.47 19 j 13 1 1.04 Candy 12 ITwizzlers $0. 25 180 $0.031 3 60 18 2_ 94 $ 22.001_ $ 2.76 $2 3_.50 - ___5 10 4 12 1 7.49 Candy 122 (Nerd Ropes $0.751 1 2 4 $0. 96 9 _ $0.75 � $0.3 $0.0 0., 71.25 $37.50 _ �- 3 12 0.08 15 6! _ Candy Candy 123 - -� Shoc kTarts -- Bubble Yum $0.75, $1 00, 24 18 ; $0. 343 1 $0. 324 1 50 - 55 5 $ 0.00 55 55� $0.00; $0.00' 55.00 $ 55.00 1 - - - - -- I - - - - - - - -� 12 4 7 1 - - - - - - - -- - 124 � - -- - - - - - -- -- -- - '',: - - -- - 9 4 5 1 .56 Cand y 125 1 Air Head Bubble Gum $0.75 ;- - 18 $0.382 1 4 9 41 $6.00 - $3.05 $ 30.75 - - - -_ - -- -- -- i --- - ! -- -- - -- Apple 0 24 $0.411 48 � 24 2 1 $3.00 -- $1.23 $ - _ - 1 - - - 3 1.14 C Dunks, o ld I 201 Juice 1 _ Cold Drin Drinks, Cold 202 203 CC ode Re _ 'Cake i _$ $1.25 6 6 $0.403r $0.417 72 - L 96 131 41 $68. 63 $85.00 $22. $28.33 $51.25 $78.75 41 2 _ -- 5 10.73 7 2 8 8.63 Drinks, Cold _ 204 Diet Coke $1.251 t 6 $0.41 72 234 204 $37.50 $12.50 $255.00' 15 6 � 26 _- 1.18 11 2.91 Drinks, Cold -- 2 -- Diet epsi - $ 1.25 _ 6 $0.403 48 - -- j _ _ 120 _ 88 ! $40. 00 - $12.91 $110.00 8 3 - - - -- - Drinks, Cold 206 Frappachino -M ocha 12 $0.8 48 ( 28 21 $14. $6.29 $42.00 2 - 1 2.67 Id Drinks, Cold Drinks, Cold 2 0 7 _ �208 Gatorade { LL) �Gat orade (0) _ $1. 5$2 .0 0 0 -- $1.50 24 _ 24 -1 $ 0.554 -- $0 .554 _ 48 -- 48 96 - - _ 73 _ � 94 1 $ 3.000 73 MOO $1.11 $0.00 _ $141.0 _ - -- 01 11 3 12 0.17 - _ __- 6 2 9 I - 9 1 15 1_ 0.14 Drinks, Col 209 Ga torade (FP) $ 1.50 24 ! $0.570 48 _ 12 118 j $3.00 _ $1.14 _ $109.5 0, $177.0 - �4 � 0.35 Drinks, C old D unks, Cold 210 211 Grape Juice - - i Ice Mountain Wa ter $1.00 -- $1.25; 24 T 28 $0.495 $ 0.246 ' 48 178 ' 24 � 602 23 $ 1.00 617 ! - 18.75 $ � $0.50 $3.69 $23.0 3 - 2 1 3 - $771. 42 17 7 1 (0.19 . - Dunks, Cold 212 - - - - - -- - -- - - - - -- Te Iced Tea - -- - - - - -- $1.25 - _ -� $0.41 , 36 65 -- 31 $42.50 $14.17 _ $38 .75', 4 1 4 , 8 .77 Drinks, Cold 213 1 Iced I de -- $1.251 6 $__ - 48 1 83 - - 59 1 $3 0.001 5 7 .5 10 2 32 $73.75; . 00 ,. - -- -- - - -- - - � Drinks, Cold 214 Mountain Dew $1.251 6 $ 0.40 3 i 72 191 , 8 5 1 i $42.7 $106 _ 11 3 11 i _ 9. 2 1 1 T 19. 43 Drinks, Cold 215 1 Orange Juice - - - -- $1.00 24 $0.423; 48 i 24 -_- -- - - -r 1251 1 7 1 $1 -- 86 25 $7.181 $7.00 _ $7 0.00 5 _ - -- - -- $ 27.8 2 1 7 9.86 Drinks, Cold 216 Pepsi p -) $ 1 .25 6 $0.403 96 -- - - 56 $ - -- -- - 1 - - -- - -- Drink Cold 2 17 Pro Fitness Water KS p -- - 1.50 -- � $1 50 8 8 $0.455 8 ! 49 1 - -- I _ 8 I 46 I $0. - - � -- $0.455 8 45 -- -- - 49 1 $0.001 '' 4 1 $ 0.00 $7 3 501 6 j - 2 � - - - - - -- 00! - - 2 - - -- 6 1 ' - Drin Co ld - - 218 Propel Fitn ess Water (L) D unks, old C - 219 :Propel Fitness Water B ( ) $1.50 - -'- -- 8 - - -- 4 - - - - -- - $0.0 - -- - - - -69 $0 .00 $67.501 6 L - - 2 6 - Drinks, Cold 220 Sport Blast (Blue) $ 0.75 1 6 $0.2451 12 18 18 $ 0.001 $0.0 $13 .50, 2 - - -- I 1 I_ - 2 - Drinks, old C 221 IS o Blast - - - -- -- p (Or -- - $0.75' 6 - $0.24 12 - 17 - -- 17 1, - -- - $ 0.00 $0.0 --- 1 $1 2.75, 3 - - -- 1 2 - _ -_ - - _ _ Drinks, Cold 222 p ort Bl ast (Purp 1 I 12 ! 17 17 $0 001 $0 .00! $1 2.751 3 -- 1 2 2 - _ -- Dunks C old _ -- ' i 223 Sor Blast r ed P O $ 0 7 5, , 6 � 0.2 - -- 12 - 1$ - - - -- 18 $0 .00 0.00 -i 13.50 � 3 - $ - 1 - - -- $1 11.25 9 2 2 -- - I - - - -- - - - -- _ 3 i 1 1 4.94 _ - - -- Drinks, Cold - - - - -- 224 p - -- _ - 24 1 14 89 $ -2-1 5 - $ Drinks, Cold -- - - - -- -- 225 Vanilla Coke ' - - $1 25 6 $0.4171 41 - -- � 42 -- - -- -- I - - 2 5 - -- - I $ 21.2 5 -!- $ 7.081 - 31.25 4 - -- 1. 251 - � - 2 - - - 3 5.44 - - - -- - - - - - -- - - Drinks, Cold 226 SFCF Coke $1. 6 $0.417, �- 14 $57.501 - _ $17.501 -- 3 1 1 1 2 j 26.29 - - -- - - - - -_i - - i Dr. Drinks, Cold 227 � Dr. P - - - - -- _ _60 _ - _ 6 1_$0.417 96 51 56 __ $.25 _ - 1 - 7 06 ; $ 8.75 $6 3.75 7 3 6 - -- - $1.25 6 I - -- - _ -- - _ - -- Drinks, Cold 228 (Diet Dew - -- - -- - - -- - -- $0.417 48 23 $31.25 $10.42, $28.75 4 ! 2 ! 3 8.70 -- _ -- - $1.251 6 Page 1 0 • Master Tally Sheet2004 Category Register iItem Description 1 Code (by name within c Item Price, Case Qty, Item Cost Origl Qty Cumulative Purchases Total Inventory Sold, retail valu6 Inventory' Value Cumulativel - Salesl ! Max Sold Avg Sold Avg Weekly I# Sales weeks Remaini Drinks, Cold 229 _C herry Pepsi Frappachin Vanilla $1.2 $2 _00 6 $0.4171 - -- $1.000 - 4 3 6 L 24 23 _ $16.251 11 $26.00 $5.42 $1 3.00 1 $28.75 $22.00 3 2 2 �_ 1 3 1 1 4.52 9.45 Drinks, C old 230 - _ Dr. Pep $1. 25 1 , 6 $0.4171 23 $8.75_ $2.9 $28. 3 2 - 3 1 2.43 Drinks, Cold 1 231 Diet __ = _30 - Drinks Hot 301 Coffee (large) _ $1 5050 - 55 �_ - $82.50 1 $72.00 $0.00 $0.00. $82.501 $72.001 11 1 9 1 3 4� 7 9 (8.00) (8.00) Drinks, Hot Drinks - Hot Drin ks, Hot Drinks Hot 302 Coffee (s al) _ _3 Hot Chocolate 304 !Tea 3 05 Decaf Te $1.00 $1.0 $1.00 $1.00 20 16 $0.166, 160 16 - - 44 16 72 - 178 - $1 78A0 7 $37.00 8 1 $8.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1.33 $178.00 $7.00 $8.00 42 2 - 2 r 9 - 1 l 1 22 ! 1 �- 1 (8.00) 42.29 8 .00 Food Ite Items 402 Brats - 40 3_ H t Dogs - - $2 .00 X2.00, 40 14 $0.7_30 $0.741 120 112 1 80 I 4 140 1 $80.001 456 $12.00 $29.19 $4.441 $280.00, $91 2.00 9 28 I -_- 4 12 1 18 j - 57 2.29 0.11 Food Food Items j 40 5 Nachos r $1.501 40 $0.760 80 37 8 336 j $63.00 26 -$8.75 $31.92 -$4.30 $504.00 $45.50 33 5 9 1 42 3 1.00 (1.54) Food Items Food Items 406 Nachos with Jalapinos 407 Pickles $1.75 $0.50 _ 30 $0.860 $0.149 60 21 270 1 187 $41.50! $ 12.40 $93.50 r 6 23 63 3.55 Food Ite 408 Popcorn $1.00 36 $0.1 1 _ - 506 - $506.00 - $66.48 $50 __2� 37 13 _ (8.00) _Frozen Treats Frozen Trea 501 Dove Ba _ 502 Free - $1.50 $0.25 10 200 $0.687 $0.029 - 600 101 83 1 $2 7.00] 3 90 $52.50 $12.371 $6.18 $124 $97.501 9 51 _ _ 3 1 3T 10 49 1.73 4.31 Frozen Treats _ 503 Endulg Bars 1 $ 1.50 $1.00 12 24 $0.657 $0.43 - -_ ` 600 1 8 130 8 $1 5.001 9 3 $37.00 $6.57 $ 15.91 $12.00 $9 3.00 2 1 18 _ 5 1 j 10 .00 3 .18 Frozen Tre Frozen Trea 504 Klon Bars 505 S lushies, Cher lar e r Y ( 9 ) $ 1.50 C $ 0.458 _ - 96 - $144.00 -� - $ 43.98 - - -- $144.00 11 - - -- - -�- 4 _12 12 _ (8 _00) Fr ozen Trea _ 506 Slushies, Cherry (small) 507 Slus Lemon (large) _ - - 508 Slushies ( L emon ( s all L ) $1 .00 -_- _ $_1.50 $1.00 -_ $0.2841 $0.497 - -- - - 1 _ 472 - $472 .00'1 101 - $ 151.50 _ 360 360. _ -_ _ - $134. - $50.21 - $110.7 $472.00 $151.50 $360.0 40 12 - - - - - -- 30 42 14 - 4� -- - 11 8 59 13 _45 (8.00) (8.00 ( 8.00) - (0.46) - -- - s Fro zen Treat en -en Treats Frozen Frozen Treats 1, 5 09 Snickers Ice Cream Bars $1.00 18 $0.444 54 } 264 280 - $16.00, -$7.10 $280.00'_ - - _35 Snacks 1 601 Beef J erkey $0.75 24 $0.297 48 48 2 $16. $6.53 _$19.50 4� 10 _ 2 4 � - 3 3 6.77 ' Snacks Snac 602 Cashews 603 Che -- - -- $0.50 $0.50 24 4 $0.348 ! $0.1 - 2 4_ 44 24 88 - j 24 1 $0.001 6 $10.001 $0.00 $3 .63 $12 $34.00 11 9 � - 3 9 9 _ 2.35 - 1.86 ____ Sn acks_ 604 C hex Mix _ $0.50 - 1 30 1 $0 .248 60 90 _ 7 8.50 3 $ 4.22 $36.50 $72. 17 - -- 3 12 - Sn acks Snacks _I Snacks 605 C ookies, Ch oc. Chip 60 6 Cookies, Peanut B 6 07 Doritos _ $0.75 $0 .751 $0.50 _ 33 33 44 1 $0 238 - - - -" 1 $0 .238 $0.181 66 33 44 97 -_ 33� 43 97 $0.00 20 $9.75 43 $0. $ 0.00 $3.10 _ $0 .00 _ $15.00 $21.50 _ 4 __6 1 2 3 _ 5_ ` - 5.2Q Snack Snacks 608 Fritos 609 Gardetto' $0.501 $ 0.50 4 4 3 6 $ 0.181 $0 .2-46- - j r 1 4�_ 36 _17 35 -- - - - - - 17 $0 .00 32 $1.50 $0.00 $0.74 $8.5 _ $16.00 - 4 _ 6 - ? 4 I 0.75 Snacks 1 6 Go urt 1 O g - - - - - -- _ -� $0.50_ � 24 0.229 9 _ 7 f $0 .00 1 �- - j - - $0. 00_ - - -- $3.50 i, -� 4 - -- 2 5 14 1.14 - - Snacks - Snacks -- -'- t 611 Gold - -- - - - 612 Gushers Fruit Snacks $ 0.50 -- $0.50 _ 24 28 $ 0.291 -- $ 0.240 -.- 48 56 48 - - - -� 56 42 , $3.00 - -- � 49 I� $3.50 $ 1.75 - -- $1.68 T $21,00 $24.50 - _ I 10 __ -_ 2 - -Il 6 1.1 - -- - - 44 - -- 44 - -- 39 $2.50 _ $ 0.91 $19.50 2 j 5 1. 03 Snacks Snacks - 613 Lays Classic _- 614 La Sour Cream &Oni $0.50 - - $0.50 44 - 4 4 $0.181 �, $0.181 4 4 1 - _ _ - �_. - $ $Q . i 80 $3 3.50 _ -- 1 3 _ - _ - r 3 _ 2.51 i - - - - -- Snacks - -- 6 Peanu �- - - y - - -- - -- -- -- _ _ $0. 24 0.31 24 - - - - - -_ - __ 20 0' -- -- - __ $1 t - $10.00 - - - - - - -- - 5 - _2 2 3 _I -- ; 1 .60 - -- - -- - 3 - S nacks - - - 616 Pistach Nu ts � -- - - -- - - -- - - le 0.50 - $0.5� 24 - -- 32 $0 .286 $0.250 24 - - -- 64 - -- -- - - - - -- 31 $ 0.00 $0.0 - $0.0 $12 - - - - 5. $ 150 1 - _ 6� _ _ 2 _ - -I - 41 - - -- Snacks -- - - - - -II Sna cks 617 Pnn - - -�- - 9 618 Ric Kris Ba - - -- Py -- - - - -- 0.50 2� 0.2$ 4 - _31 - - -- - - - -- -- 3 - 2 25 _0.00 - 1 $ - -- $ $12.5 - 3 5 j 2.0 __ Snack 61 Slim Ji $1.0 T 18 , $0.4 54 54 - $110 43 ..8 - -_ -- $4 - -- $4 3.00 -- - -- - -- - 1 68.80 - -- - _S - - -- - - -- 620 St nn C heese -- --0 g - -- -- - _ ��Sunflower -; - $0.50 - $0 � 96 _ _ - - 96 -- 338 � 10 1 43.00 -- $ - 2541 $42.00 $17.90 - - - - - $22.391 $5.00' __ -- - - $127.00 2 - - - -- 25 , 1 - - - - 7 - 32 - j 2.65 Snacks 621 Seeds 75 $0.267 150 Page 2 • CITY OF S HOREWO OD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD • SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 -8927 • (952) 474 -3236 FAX (952) 474 -0128 • www.ci.shorewood.mn.us • cityhall @ci.shorewood.mn.us MEMORANDUM TO: Park Commission Craig Dawson, City Administrator FROM: Larry Brown, Director of Public Works DATE: October 29, 2004 RE: Park Signage The Park Commission has expressed an interest in reviewing the overall park signage for the Shorewood parks. The existing entrance signs to the park are the red stained cedar posts with wood banners. Lettering is • routed into the banners and painted yellow. In addition City Hall and the Southshore Senior Community Center have followed this theme. Staff has found examples of popular signage from the Internet, to begin discussions of what the Park Commission would like to consider for this issue. Please feel free to add or bring pictures or drawings of other signs that may be of interest. ®�® PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER �5 Fairway Stone - Golf Course and Park Entrance Signs Page 1 of 6 wY STONE"� ENTRANCE NS Entrance Signs play an important role in establishing an image for your community, park or golf c Granite is a natural choice for signage. Fairway Stone signs are permanent, attractive and afforda materials available: Customer List, Granite Color Samples, Installation Guidelines, Lettering Visi Chart, Granite Bench Specifications. Please don't hesitate to contact us for a Free Design Renderh 0, notation! Entrance Signs Available in a variety of sizes and granite shades. Links At Hiawatha Landing Distinctive entrance sign for a golf club in upstate New York. We designed the sign to frame their logo. Sign: 6' wide x 4.5' tall x 4" thick • Granite Color: Silver Cloud Atlanta Athletic Club The AAC asked us to design an entrance sign that fits the character of their exclusive club. Sign: 4' circle with 4" rounded polished edges Granite Color: Jet Black Indian Hills Country Club ___________.._.___ • A bold and simple sign for this country http://www.fairwaystone.coinJentrance.html 10/26/2004 Fairway Stone - Golf Course and Park Entrance Signs 0 P_j Page 2 of 6 club. Sign: 9' wide x 3' tall x 6" thick Granite Color: Silver Cloud Chattahoochee Golf Club A sign fit for a custom base. Sign: 3' wide x 3' tall x 4" thick Granite Color: American Black Oasis State Park This park sign highlights the setting in choice of granite color and design. With polished faces and hand -hewn edges, the sign rests on an L- shaped base of a contrasting granite shade. Sign: 6' wide x 4' tall x 4" thick Granite Color: Missouri Red Base: 8' wide x 3' tall x 8" thick Granite Color: Keystone Blue Stone Mountain Park Georgia's Stone Mountain Park called upon us to revamp the entire park's signage for the 1996 Olympic Games. At the park, we have also created a Granite 10/26/2004 http://www.fairwaystone.com/entrance.html Fairway Stone - Golf Course and Park Entrance Signs NEW SOUTH ASSO ARCHAEOL ARCHITLC�u�� � Page 3 of 6 Quary Exhibit (150,000 lbs of cut stone) and marked all of their Nature Trails. Sign: 11' wide x 5' tall x 4" thick Base: 12' wide x 18" tall x 12" thick Granite Color: Silver Cloud New South Associates Unpolished light Georgia Gray ganite sign with hand -hewn edges provides a more rustic impression. This base style is very popular as it enhances the presentation of the sign. Sign: 4' wide x 27" tall x 4" thick Base: 28" wide x 20" tall x 10" thick Granite Color: Georgia Gray The Peninsula This high -end residential development wanted to make a visible statement with the size of their sign. Located on a Gulf coast highway, the sign is readable from 1/4 mile and it weighs 6 tons! Sign: 24' wide x 5' tall x 6" thick Granite Color: Flash Black Ll Rowlett Municipal Center The solidity and permanence of granite makes it a natural for local, state, educational and federal institutions. http:// www .fairwaystone.com /entrance.html 10/26/2004 Fairway Stone - Golf Course and Park Entrance Signs is 0 • Allen Wilson Terrace The precise cut of this sign was achieved by a computer - controlled contour saw. 10/26/2004 Page 4 of 6 Sign: 5' wide x Y tall x 4" thick Base: 6' wide x 18" tall x 8" thick Granite Color: Salisbury Pink Dekalb Park District The Dekalb Illinois Park District began a project with us 10 years ago to replace each sign (40) in their district with granite signs. They constructed their bases of formed and finished concrete. Sign: 6' wide x 4' tall x 4" thick Granite Color: American Black Tremont Fountain Park Pentagonal sign with metallic gold lettering set directly upon its foundation. To create the unique shape of this sign, we created a pattern on our CAD system and cut the pattern by hand, hammer and chisel. Sign: 4' wide x 4' tall x 4" thick Granite Color: Flash Black http://www.fairwaystone.com/entrance.html Fairway Stone - Golf Course and Park Entrance Signs Page 5 of 6 f The Decatur Housing Authority (public) sought a sign that was truly vandal resistant. • Sign: 8' wide x 4' tall x 4" thick Granite Color: Keystone Blue City of Cornelia The story of a Vietnam War hero who earned the Congressional Medal of Honor is captured on this 2 -sided monument with both carved and laser etched artwork. Sign: T wide x 4' tall x 4" thick Base: 5' wide x T tall x 12" thick Granite Color: Galaxy Black City of Thibodaux, Louisiana This impressive City Hall entrance sign with a highly detailed city crest is set on a poured concrete base. Sign: 6' wide x 4' tall x 4" thick Granite Color: Ebony Mist Accessories II Patented II Il II Request I Request I About Installation Graphics Customer I Catalog & a Fairwav http:// www .fairwaystone.com/entrance.html 10/26/2004 [ T ][ 41W [ 1 *1EE Signs gnS Signs Accessories II Patented II Il II Request I Request I About Installation Graphics Customer I Catalog & a Fairwav http:// www .fairwaystone.com/entrance.html 10/26/2004 Sandblasted.com I Custom Dimensional Wood & HDU Signs I Portfolio Sandblasted Entr • 0 SANDBLASTED 4 5 SANDBLASTED SIGNSr CNC ROUTED SIGNSu ROUTED LETTERS 8 LOGOS■ SIGN MONUMENTSo OTHER SIGN SOLUTIONSm OUR PORTFOLIO sandblasted suns cnc routed signs routed letters Et logos lobby displays specialty GET AN ESTIMATE® CONTACT USm HOMEr Page 1 of 2 Our Sandblasted Suns ,Portfolio - ENTRANCE Please Click on an Image for a larger View. f r0� ` mo MOUSE DESIGN STUDIO 1264 Alpharetta Street Roswell, Georgia USA 30075 770 - 518 -0292 770 - 518 -0294 FAX 0 10/25/2004 http:// www .sandblasted.com/portfolioPages /sandblasted /portfolio_Sand Entrance.html Sandblasted.com I Custom Dimensional Wood & HDU Signs I Portfolio Sandblasted Entr... Page 2 of 2 Y � nd13471 SIGN DESIGN : AVAILABLE MATERIALS : AVAILABLE FINISHES copyright@2004 M ouse Design Studio a Sandblasted. corn • P http: / /www. sandblasted. com/portfolloPages/ sandblasted /portfolio_Sand_Entrance.html 10/25/2004 • Church & School Signs by Montauk Sign Carving Co. Online Gallery Click Each Image to See A Larger View • P_revio_us P_a.ge. I Next. Page All photos represent work done in our own shop. Direct retail projects and designs, as well as work produced for other sign shops and designers are depicted. Page 1 of 1 Home Montauk Sign Carving Co. 4772 South Stephentown Rd. East Nassau, NY 12062 (518) 766 -5999 Tel. (518) 794 -8809 Fax. info(o Email. u http://www.signcarvers.com/gallery3.htm 10/25/2004 EFA - Traffic Signs 7N. ' _ Pr u t ihawr,�?sa). Traffic Sig Construction S n Street Na Signs . Custom Signs Traffic Accessories,.'' Installation Services Custom Signs / Decals / Vehicle Graphics At Earl F. Andersen, Inc. you'll find we have the expertise to provide most all custom signs and decals you may need. The possibilities are endless. Custom signs can be manufactured on reflective and non - reflective aluminum, steel, plastic, wood, plus other material options. Decals can also be made from a variety of materials — reflective or non - reflective — small or large quantities for both indoor and outdoor use. Here are just a few examples. Welcome To K% O N G 'rop Homu of the CAIRL)1tYALS Decals Vehicle Graphics Phyaitat Therapy Patient Parking ' S outh Lilt 'SR Page 1 of 2 .J http : / /www.efa- nm.com /tsCustom.html 10/25/2004 Custom Signs • • E Natural slab signage. Page I of 2 Sign Information Base Material Local native adocite boulder Copy Sand carved with color stain Client Deer Park Location Sparks, Nevada Notes Sponsorship plaque inset to offset cost and provide recognition. Angel Park granite and bronze directional sign An-gel Park -granite and bronze drop area sign Ang.g.j.-Pgrk ra. il..n�.,bow.,.slIp.n.d..st�one al.n..1d, bro—nZe #3.-t.ee. s.i.gri. Other Angel Park rainbow sandstone and bronze drop area si gn. ............ . ........... ........ .. - .. .. .. ......... ... ..... .. . .............. 1 1-1- 111-11 ... . ......... Can yp.n_Sp rings qgrygO. joca I boulder t ............... 1-1-ee-stgn Boulder LQst..CjnyQjjs Course hole #16 tee sign Signage Quincy School natural granite entrance sign Rancho Murieta Country Club hole #5 tee sian ........... ........... --', . ..... The.-Ridge Qo1f..CQurse boulder and bronze #7-te i Whitehawk Ranch granite boulder #6.,tee,,sig.n 01"d Greenwood Golf Course Ange�j Park * Golf ­ C ' lub Brooksi ._Pro fe s sional I ' ' Cnter * e G , o * Id M , o resident re i * denti , a l W" Mob.a. -K- M1.0ad-oWls, rO ential Other .P.l�u�.�m�Ials'.1�Eu..rl.e..Rl.a E-stal-els- Poppy Ridge ....Go IfI.-C-quIrse. Entrance Poppy ,.Ridge Golf Course N.C.G.A. Sign http://www.sandstormsigns.com/boulder/deerp.html 10/26/2004 Natural slab signage. Permanent roadside entrance signs. Page I of 2 Sign Information Base Material Granite Copy Sand carved with color stain Client Granite Bay Community Association Location Granite Bay, California Notes Local native boulder produced on site Angel Park granite and bronze directional sign Angel Park granite and bronze drop area sign .. 1.-.i1 1.11--- ...... .... I ...s......... -- 1.11 1 ................. . I I - ......................... -- -- .-- e ;sj.gjn. Ange! park ranbow andstone and bronze. te i Angel Parkrainbow sandstone and bronze droo Q ....... . and area sIg........... Other Canyon Springs carved local boulder te Boulder Lost C,04 Course. hole #16 tee s W-ign. Quincy High School natural granite entrance sign Signage Rancho Murieta Country Club hole #5 tee sian . .. .. .. ...... bronze #7 ....... -- -, 1..", 11-.1- Tftq Ridge Golf Course boulder and bronze #7 tee sign W.h..itehawk Ranch granite boulder #6 tee sign Old Greenwood Golf Course Deer Park Angel ParKI-G-olf-Chub Brookside Professional Center Other Q.cj,jjy n.,$prings Golf Cour e ............. .................. .................. -$-. Gold Mountain * n r. esidential develooment Entrance Mo hawk Meadows residential deve'IoD erit .......... - ................. ... . .... .. ............ Signage PJV ma-'s Eureka Estates Ppp-py.-Riclge Golf_ Cpurse PoppyRidge Go * I * f Course N.C.G.A., Sign Quincy Junior-Senior High School 40 0 • http://www.sandston 10/26/2004 The Granite Bay Community Park roadside entrance sign.