110304 PK AgPCITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD
SPARK COMMISSION MEETING CITY HALL
WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 3, 2004 7:00 P.M.
AGENDA
1. CONVENE PARK COMMISSION MEETING
A. Roll Call
Davis
Gilbertson
Meyer _
Young
Farniok
Westerlund
Wagner
B. Review Agenda
2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. Park Commission Meeting Minutes of September 28, 2004(Att. #2A Draft
Summary)
3. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR
4. MN PARK AND RECREATION — Michelle Synder (Att. - #4)
5. COMMUNITY REC RESOURCES — (Att. - #5)
A. Quarterly Report
B. 2005 Process Change
C. Proposed Changes for Park Priority Plan
6. REPORTS
A. Report on City Council Meeting of October 11, 2004 and October 25, 2004
7. DISCUSS POTENTIAL CONTRIBUTION FOR OFF -LEASH DOG PARK AT LAKE
MINNEWASHTA REGIONAL PARK (Att. - #7)
8. CONCESSION STAND REPORTS AND OPERATIONS (Att. - #8)
9. DISCUSS SIGNS FOR THE PARKS (Att. - #9)
10. DETERMINE LIAISON FOR NOVEMBER AND DECEMBER CITY COUNCIL
MEETINGS
11. NEW BUSINESS Council Liaison:
November:
12. ADJOURNMENT December:
CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD
PARK COMMISSION MEETING CITY HALL
», TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 28, 2004 7:00 P.M.
MINUTES of, , �� ;_�
r� c�';�, �t � 1
1. CONVENE PARK COMMISSION MEETING
Chair Davis called the meeting to order at 7:02 p.m.
A. Roll Call
Present: Chair Davis; Commissioners Meyer, Young, Farmok, Westerlund, and Wagner; City
Engineer Brown; and City Council liaison Zerby
Absent: Commissioner Gilbertson was absent
B. Review Agenda
Item #9, Signs, was moved to the goals and priorities section of the agenda item #7.
Farniok moved, Meyer seconded, Approving the agenda as amended. Motion passed
6/0.
2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. Park Commission Meeting Minutes of August 10, 2004
Westerlund asked for a review of the motion under item #7 and that revisions be made to clarify
the motion more clearly.
Westerlund moved, Meyer seconded, to approve the Minutes of the August 10, 2004 Park
Commission Meeting subject to review of the taped motion under item #7 and revisions so
noted. Motion passed 6/0.
B. Park Commission Special Meeting Minutes of August 31, 2004
Young moved, Meyer seconded, to approve the Minutes of the August 30, 2004 Park
Commission Meeting as presented. Motion passed 6/0.
3. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR
Meyer asked if the Commission would be getting an update regarding the Freeman Plaza.
Brown indicated that they would give an update under the Capital Improvement Program.
4. REPORTS
A. Report on City Council Meeting of September 13 and 27
• Brown reported that on September 13 the City Council amended the Park Foundation by -laws to
reflect that they are an autonomous entity from the City, removing the directive that directors of the
Foundation be appointed by the City Council. Accordingly, the requirement was also removed from
the City Ordinance as well.
PARK COMMISSION MINUTES
TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 28, 2004
PAGE 2 OF 8
F � t
On other matters, the City Council approved the sign permit for the South Tonka Little League, the
Donor Policy, and the Freeman Park Plaza Plan per the Park Commissions recommendations. In
addition, Brown stated that the amendment that revised the term for the Park Commission to three
years beginning March I" running through the last day in February was approved.
Brown reported that the September 27` meeting contained an amendment to the Ordinance that the
Chair and Vice -Chair for both the Planning and Park Commission be chosen by the Commission
itself. While this has been the practice, the Ordinance was revised to reflect this policy.
In addition, work sessions have been held in which residents discussed concerns regarding overflow
drainage near Freeman Park through the Shorewood Oaks neighborhood. Since this tune, Council has
directed staff and representatives of WSB to take a look at the area to determine the most practical
method of addressing the drainage concerns and overflow of that area. Recommendations were made
by WSB which included an option to pave the walkway area and create a drainage swale, which
would also formalize the entrance to the park. A second option, would be for the City to consider
covering the cost of installing a pipe from the property boundary of Freeman Park all the way to
Shorewood Oaks to the north. The pipe eventually would spill out into the proposed Freeman
Wetland area project.
With neighborhood feedback, the City Council recommended staff proceed with the outflow swale
through the side yards of the homes via the City outlot at a cost of roughly $15,000 and that the City
continue to monitor the situation. If it is determined that this solution does not function well, then
installation of a pipe would be considered through the Shorewood Oaks neighborhood at a cost of
nearly $60,000- 70,000 +. Brown stated that the downside to the pipe installation would be that the
neighbors in Shorewood Oaks would be responsible for gaining easements through the very back
yards of some residents in the Shorewood Oaks development.
Wagner asked what the collection point would be.
L,.�a A + 4' +t o �. ,,.,,�rA fi„ Rr�,xm stated that the F' bituminous r , wnt�lcl ri
I , Ueu out CA Ule stornn,vate. und, L h. r __-_ an as for as the
fire hydrant and ultimately end up in the gutter of Shorewood Oaks Drive. He noted that the future
improvements to the Freeman Park Pond will improve the water quality immensely.
5. UPDATE FROM CARVER COUNTY PARKS ON DOG PARK
Lenny Schmitz, of the Carver County Parks system, updated the City on its progress in partnering
with several communities to further the off leash dog park in Lake Minnewashta Regional Park.
Schmitz informed the Commission that the City of Chanhassen Park Commission has passed a
recommendation to their Council to allocate $20,000 in their 2005 CIP for the development of the off
leash dog park and the City of Victoria has passed a recommendation to their Council to commit
$5,000 to the project. He noted that the City of Excelsior did not express much interest in
participating in the project at this time, nor did the City of Chaska. He indicated that Carver county
Parks has begun the process of directing Brauer and Associates, a landscape architects specialty
company, to look at a couple of alternative site plans.
Davis asked how the Park system plans to contact dog owners to gauge their interest.
PARK COMMISSION MINUTES
' "TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 28, 2004
PAGE 3 OF 8
• Schmitz indicated that they have been contacted by a minimum of several hundred dog owners who
support the dog park and will spread word of the project. While most emails have been favorable,
there is always controversy when it comes to designating an area for off leash dog parks.
Westerlund asked whether dogs on leashes would be allowed within. the rest of the park.
Schmitz stated that the off leash dog park would consist of approximately 15 acres; however, leashed
dogs would be allowed within other areas of the park. While the estimation for the initial investment
for the dog park is $40,000, the park would take over costs for running the park.
Davis indicated that she wished to be kept abreast of the progress the County makes. She inquired
how the park would raise funds and charge for the parks use.
Schmitz encouraged the Shorewood Park Commission to consider pledging an amount or making a
recommendation to its Council supporting a partnership with the Carver County Park System. He
explained that Carver County Park would bill the partner cities once the plans have been determined
based on the amount of money available from its partners. While enforcement gets to be an issue,
Schmitz stated that the dog park would have a separate entrance and honor boxes.
Farniok asked if the Park was going to go forward with the level of support it has been given to date.
Schmitz reiterated that they plan to proceed with the initial steps of working with Brauer and
Associates on some initial site plans for the dog park. He promised to keep the Commissioners
informed of upcoming meeting dates.
Ann Nye, 1641 West 63rd Street — Excelsior, owner of the Wayzata Book Store, presented the
Commission with a petition containing over 150 names of residents from the lakes area who support
the construction of a dog park. She stated that there are a large number of people within the lakes
area that are excited about the potential of a dog park in the. Minnewashta Regional Park. She
encouraged the City of Shorewood to participate in the partnership, especially since little room
remains within Freeman Park for this addition.
Meyer asked for ideas of how to raise money for the construction of the dog park.
While she did not have immediate ideas, Nye stated that she would be willing to assist in the
fundraising efforts for the dog park. She believed that most people would be willing to purchase an
additional permit to use the dog park, which would also raise funds for dog parks construction.
Tam Akins, 603 Glencoe Rd - Excelsior resident, stated that he would love to see the dog park
delineated in the park; however, pointed out that the terrain of the current area used for dogs is not
really suitable for another use than a dog park area. He explained that the park is used most by dog
owners, in contrast to any other use at the park, and did not want to see limits set on the area used by
. pet owners.
Davis asked what Mr. Akins was proposing.
Akins stated that he did not see why the park needs to identify a dog park area at all, `if it ain't broke,
don't fix it' was his philosophy. Due to the rough terrain, he maintained that it is the dog owners and
PARK COMMISSION MINUTES
TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 28, 2004
PAGE 4 OF 8
A
not recreational users who are using the park now; therefore, additional expenditures to put up
fencing or parking are unnecessary. 0
From a community point of view, Meyer indicated that it would the City's intention that other users
be given the opportunity to use the park. She believed that the overall `community' demand warrants
the need to open up the park to more users.
Westerlund asked how much space would be added to the park for the dog park.
Schmitz stated that the Park would hope to add another mile of trails within the approximately 15
acres designated for the dog park. He pointed out that people who are uncomfortable around dogs,
such as families with small children, tend to avoid the 80 acres of back trails where dogs are free to
roam. Schmitz stated that the proposed 15 acres, the dog park would be the third largest dog park in
the metro area.
As a dog owner, Davis stated that her concern would be that someday dogs might be banned from the
park; therefore, owners should do all that they can to retain as much real estate of the park for dogs
today as possible.
Patty Feeney, 5630 Christmas Lake Point - Shorewood resident, stated that she visited the park this
morning with her grandson in a stroller and her dog. She stated that this park is a very special park
and different than any other park in the system and it would be her desire to walk the entire park area
and not just be limited to 15 acres. As a responsible pet owner, her proposal would be to require pet
owners to pay a bit more to use the entire park for their use, and let them decide when to put their
pets on a leash.
Young commented that this attitude sounds very idealistic, when the papers all the time site many
irresponsible dog owners who don't leash their pets when others are around and this leads to
problems.
Julie Eisraney, frequent visitor of Lake Minnewashta Regional Park who trains hunting dogs, stated
that she has never had an incident at the park in the past 25 years, but was given a ticket this summer
r - �+ I - ..; ,. I--- A-- 1- -I,-A .,r +l,o ,-, ,1L UT],. ol - 1 - 1 +1- i„rl rtP -Ar ra clip rniilrl an Aanth liPr nat
lul not 110.ving 1161 1106 WaJIWU UL Lill. P=. yr -1- .iii... aaa — -, x- I . — -.v ..+........ b" I -- -- I—
to let him run, the judge suggested she try to change the law. Since June, Eisraney indicated that this
is what she has been attempting to do.
Westerlund questioned how changing the law to a leash or off leash law was relevant to the City of
Shorewood voting to support the dog park.
Eisraney stated that she would leave a copy of her proposed changes for review and suggested that
the park consider instigating a permit for use of the park.
Young asked if the leash law was a safety issue.
•
Schmitz stated that dogs are not allowed to roam unrestricted without leashes; therefore, this supports
the need for the dog park.
PARK COMMISSION MINUTES
"TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 28, 2004
PAGE 5 OF 8
. 6. CONCESSION STAND REPORTS AND OPERATIONS FOR 2005
Brown reviewed the sales information provided by Scott Qualle, Freeman Park concessionaire,
noting that the report was incomplete due to Qualle's computer crashing.
Young asked why many dates were excluded from the report and how the initial figures compared to
the sales of the previous year.
Brown stated that the date exceptions were due to rainouts. In contrast to last year, Brown indicated
that the concessions had sold approximately $11,000 worth of goods last year.
Westerlund suggested that staff compile more information to compare the two years and report back
at a future meeting.
Brown indicated that he had asked Qualle whether he might have any initial interest in running the
concessions the next year, to which he replied he would.
7. DISCUSS GOALS, PRIORITIES AND WORK PROGRAM
Brown reviewed the 2004 Shorewood Park Commission Goals and the 8 additional items that the
Commission wished to see added to the list. Brown asked for feedback from the Commission
regarding the priority these items should be addressed in.
Westerlund stated that she would support immediate consideration of a park signage discussion,
followed by examination of a larger issue like water quality.
Davis noted that many of the goals and issues could be separated into several categories; first, some
fall under the big items such as drainage, horticulture, and trees in our parks; others consist of
immediate issues like buckthorn control, signage, and vandalism that would provide more `instant
gratification' if resolved; and finally, further educational efforts or programs in our parks should be
investigated. She felt the Commission should try to pick one big item to try to accomplish over the
next year, as well as, addressing the smaller instant gratification items.
Since it is extremely visible, Wagner believed that park signage should be the first issue addressed by
the Commission, followed by the vandalism issue, and finally the larger issues such as water quality
and managing wetland and water in our parks.
Meyer felt the water quality issue might involve a presentation from an educated source.
Famiok stated that several of the items are short term `clean up' items, such as reviewing the
concession operation numbers and signage; whereas, other items meet the long term items to work
on. She pointed out that the educational piece should come first, before the Commission tries to
•
tackle some of the big items.
Brown indicated that he had a general direction of how to proceed, including signage, vandalism,
concession numbers, and a water quality presentation.
PARK COMMISSION MINUTES
TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 28, 2004
PAGE 6 OF 8
8. DETERMINE INVOLVEMENT WITH MN REC AND THE COMMISSION
DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM •
Davis stated that she would love to invite a wetland expert or DNR representative to a Commission
meeting to discuss water quality and some of the other items on the goals list. She asked Brown and
the Commission whether they felt they were getting their money's worth via membership of the Mn
Recreation and Parks Association.
As mentioned in his memo, Brown stated that the initial first annual Commission Development
Program was somewhat successful; however, more time might have been useful for the Cities to
share ideas.
Although members for just one year, Young stated that the association still appears to be a rich
resource for the Commission and went virtually untapped by the Commission last year. He believed
that it might be worthwhile to renew the membership for a second year as they might have access to
some of the liaisons or expertise we'd like to pursue in some of the issues we are dealing with. He
suggested the Commission revisit the membership next year if they have not proven their value to
draw our support.
Meyer concurred, stating that it was likely the Commission's own fault that it failed to use them as a
resource, since they have been very responsive to our needs.
Davis suggested staff invite representatives of the Association to make a presentation to the .
Commission as to their ability to assist the City with its list of goals and issues over the next year.
9. DISCUSS SIGNS FOR THE PARK
This item was incorporated into the goals item #7 and would be addressed at a later date.
10. REVIEW OF THE 2004 AND 2005 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CIP)
A. Review Schedule of Improvements
Brown reviewed the CIP for the 2003 Park Fund from Park Dedication Fees which equaled roughly
$86,902, with an additional $27,900 in park dedication fees in 2004, for a balance of $114,800. He
pointed out that an additional $33,000 was anticipated from the Barrington development. While
fewer and fewer lot splits will continue to occur, Brown encouraged the Commission to spend its
budget wisely. On the up side, Brown pointed out that when the levy limits were backed off recently,
the Council, spearheaded by Council member Zerby, reacted to this by reinstating the $10,000 for
general park improvements back into the budget each year.
Wagner questioned what sort of balance in its contingency account the City expected to keep in their
Park improvements account.
Brown stated that $20,000 had been earmarked for the skate park equipment, thus leaving an account
balance in excess of $80,000. In recognition of the Public Works Department, Brown pointed out that
the trail around the north end of Freeman Park was over 2/3 complete as of today, and was coming in
under budget.
PARK COMMISSION MINUTES
"TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 28, 2004
PAGE 7 OF 8
Meyer asked whether the City Council would be helping to offset expenditures for the Minnewashta
dog park if the Park Commission made a recommendation for this investment or whether the Park
fund would be used to offset that expenditure.
Brown stated that, as a staff member, he would assume that this expenditure would likely come out
of the CIP plan for the Park Commission.
Zerby indicated that it would be a much easier sell to the City Council if the Commission was
straightforward with the Council and said the Commission found additional money in the Park
budget and would like to use a portion of it for the dog park. While he felt the dog park was a good
idea, he commented that he had not seen a ground swell of support to warrant the Council paying for
it.
Wagner asked what action the Park Commission was expected to take this evening with regard to the
dog park. He indicated that he thought it set a bad precedent to support City's contributing to County
parks and asked if this was common practice to contribute to County Parks.
Brown stated that the Commission was under no obligation to make any commitment to the dog park
this evening, and based on the comments from the public, he believed more consideration must be
given to the subject.
• Meyer pointed out that consideration of a dog park was one of the Commission's identified priorities
for several years.
With the Carmichael development, Brown noted that water service would be brought along Highway
7 and staff would be demanding that service be provided for the skate park as well.
B. Accept Proposal for Southshore Community Park
Brown shared the recommendations by Tim Hughes and the quotes supplied by Ramptech and True
Rides for upgrading the skate park equipment. He explained that it would be his recommendation that
the surface be repaired; the existing equipment would remain, with the addition of a 4' high ramp and
quarter pipe, as well as, resheeting the existing equipment.
Davis agreed that the upgrades were necessary and the addition of the first two items acceptable;
however, she was hesitant to invest a great deal more without knowing whether the trend was
waning.
Meyer pointed out that the investment for the first two items would be approximately $5,300, with
additional shipping and handling.
Westerlund moved, Wagner seconded, to approve the top two items of the Ramptech bid which
. include the 4' Quarter pipe and 4' Bank Ramp, with the addition of shipping and handling
charges as staff deems reasonable. Motion passed 6/0.
PARK COMMISSION MINUTES
TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 28, 2004
PAGE 8 OF 8
11. NEW BUSINESS 0
Davis suggested that staff obtain pictures of the current signs for discussion of the signage issue
for upcoming meetings.
Meyer concurred, urging Commissioners to visit various parks to view the signs prior to the
discussion.
As a review of the Park Plaza design, Davis reported that the landscape architect had rearranged
the tree placement slightly and access walk.
Brown reported that, while the City Council approved the plans moving forward for the plaza,
the Foundation was reminded that no construction will take place until the funds were in an
escrow account with the city or letter of credit filed.
Westerlund voiced concern regarding the potential for cut through traffic from the corner of
Eddy Station to the corner of the plaza without additional plantings. She also suggested that the
use of native plants be encouraged.
Having visited the site, Famiok felt the cut - through traffic would not be as big a concern as one
might first think.
Brown stated that he would bring the Commission's suggestions back to the landscape architect
for insertion into the plans.
Davis requested that the November meeting be moved to an alternate date, since neither she nor
Gilbertson would be available to attend. After discussion, the Commission agreed to hold the
meeting on November 3, 2004.
Council Meetings: October 11:Davis October 25: Westerlund
12. ADJOURNMENT
Meyer moved, Westerlund seconded, adjourning the Park Commission Meeting of
September 28, 2004. Motion passed 6/0.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,
Kristi B. Anderson
Recording Secretary
is
0 Memorandum
To: Park Commission
From: Twila Grout, Park Secretary
Date: 10/28/2004
Re: Agenda Item #4 - MN Park and Recreation
Michelle Synder from MN Park and Recreation will be present at the Park Commission
meeting on Tuesday, November 3, 2004.
Listed below are suggestions that the Park Commission would like to discuss with Michelle
at the meeting.
1. The Park Commissions focus areas for 2005 (water quality, signage, vandalism) -
Does the MN Park and Rec have any information they can share with the
commissioners regarding these items.
2. Insight on what the MN Park and Rec sees in the future for the park systems that may
be helpful to the Park Commission.
3. Trends in program development -low cost or cost - effective programs that bring the
people out.
4. Raising (BIG) money through the grant process to develop and/or enhance the parks.
5. Trends in park renovation and development (there have been articles in major
journals and on the internet on the move away from organized sports).
6. Nature /horticulture /preservation - trends, activities, priorities, who done anything.
0
rM10
• community rec. resources
Date: 6/31/04
To: Larry Brown, Park Commission, Honorable Mayor, and City Council
CC: Administrator Dawson
From: Kristi Anderson and Sally Keefe
RE: 2004 Second Quarter Report from Community Rec. Resources
Attached is the report of activities from Community Rec. Resources summarizing
activities and challenges in its role as Park Coordinator for the City of Shorewood for
the third quarter of 2004. Monitoring and communication between City Staff, CRR,
and Sports organizations provided the highlights for the third quarter. Again, CRR
suggests consideration be given to clearly stating expectations and enforcement of
policy related to timeliness of document and fee submission. Should you have any
further questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact Community Rec.
Resources principals, Kristi Anderson or Sally Keefe. As always, we appreciate the
continued support of City Staff and Council.
Kristi Anderson and Sally Keefe
Community Rec. Resources
•
I
community rec. resources
Date: 9/30/04
To: Larry Brown, Park Commission, Honorable Mayor, and City Council
CC: Administrator Dawson
From: Kristi Anderson and Sally Keefe, Community Rec. Resources
RE: Quarterly Report of activities from July 1, 2004 to September 30, 2004
Similar to the first half of 2004, Park Coordinator services for third quarter activities
brought with them their own set of unique circumstances. Communication continued
to be a main component, as was monitoring of the fall park utilization. While use
decreased over the latter part of the quarter, many sports organizations and passive
users were able to utilize the park system and take advantage of the beautiful fall
weather conditions.
•
The spring /summer sporting season quietly drew to a close in mid -July. Overall field •
use was directed by the schedule with little deviation from the designated blocks of
time requested. The number of users remained fairly consistent for the spring season,
with one organization requesting reimbursement from the City. No tournament
applications were received by the City, and fields remained quiet for all park users
into mid- August.
CRR would also like to compliment the City's Public Works Department in
maintaining excellent fields throughout the year's sporting seasons. Issues of
concerns raised by the sporting organizations were received and dealt with in an
effective manner, and despite the wet spring weather, the overall field conditions
were excellent for baseball and soccer at season end.
Monitoring of the park system found diminished use of the parks overall as a result of
the "break" in field use with a slight increase in passive use. CRR Staff members had
the pleasure of observing the Paul Cherba Jazz Quartet as part of the Music in the
Park event held on August 13, 2004. Attendance was light at this event, but was quite
enjoyable for all ages. CRR Staff has also utilized the Freeman Park trail system in
the wooded area of the park, and would like to compliment the City on its efforts to
enhance this area through the Wetland Restoration project slated in the near future.
Fall schedules were released to South Tonka Little League, Tonka Babe Ruth, and the
Tonka Football Association for field use beginning August 14, 2004. As per the
process, final schedules were released with the understanding that rosters and user
fees would be received by the City from all teams prior to field use dates specified in
the documentation submitted by each organization. Sadly, this was not the case for
any of the teams. Complete rosters and collection of user fees provided the impetus
for repeated communications to each sports organization throughout the season, with
final completed documentation received from one team as late as September 14, 2004
(approximately one month after the beginning of the season). Once again, CRR.
recommends specific direct verbiage be inserted into the Park Priority Policy
detailing the need for timely completion and submission of documentation.
With the beginning of the fall season, Badger Park saw increased use, both on the
football field and the tennis courts. CRR is happy to report monitoring events of that
park yielded no parking problems as in recent years. CRR Staff also spoke with
representatives of the Southshore Senior Community Center in mid - season, whom
also reported the parking situation was much improved over previous recent years.
This may also be attributed to the fact that there were few evening events scheduled
at the Center during the season as well.
As the fall sporting season draws to a close, CRR anticipates meeting with City Staff
to discuss potential changes to the documentation collection process for spring 2004
use, as well as proposed verbiage for consideration of implementation within the Park
Priority Policy regarding the data collection process. As always, CRR appreciates the
continued support of City Staff and Council in providing Park Coordinator services to
the City.
2
• community rec. resources
Date: 10/28/04
To: Larry Brown, Park Commission, Honorable Mayor, and City Council
CC: Administrator Dawson
From: Kristi Anderson and Sally Keefe
RE: Proposed Draft Language for Revision to Park Priority Policy
As you are aware, Community Rec. Resources (CRR) has had the pleasure of working with
City Staff, Commissions, and Council over the past two years. In that time, CRR has made
several suggestions regarding necessary language changes to the Park Priority Policy
believed to enhance park usage as well as clarify and strengthen the process utilized by CRR
• and City Staff in securing appropriate documentation from park users prior to allocating field
space. To that end, CRR Staff is submitting a potential draft revision of the Park Priority
Policy for discussion and consideration. Sally Keefe will be present at the November 3,
2004, Park Commission Meeting to discuss the proposed revisions in detail.
Should you have any questions regarding this proposed draft revision of the Park Priority
Policy, prior to the November 3, 2004 Park Commission Meeting, please do not hesitate to
contact CRR Staff member Sally Keefe at 952.471.1109. Thank you in advance for your
consideration and comments. Your efforts are greatly appreciated.
Community Rec. Resources
Kristi Anderson and Sally Keefe
is
City of Shorewood
Park Priority Policies
The City of Shorewood is very proud of its parks system and works enthusiastically to maintain and
enhance park properties. To that end, the City utilizes a number of policies to help to guide
implementation of park goals, directives, and ordinances regulating park usage for all residents.
The intent of this policy is to grant all users the opportunity to utilize facilities within a managed
and predictable manner, thereby allowing all residents an optimum park usage experience.
1. DEFINITIONS
The Park Priority Policies utilize a number of definitions for clarity to allow objective use by all
park users. Following is a list of definitions found throughout the Park Priority Policies.
Designated Representative: Each organization or group requesting priority field or facility use,
shall designate and file with the Park Coordinator the name, address, and contact information of the
individual who shall serve as the sole contact for the City of Shorewood. This individual shall serve
as the liaison for all matters between the City of Shorewood and the sports organization or group
requesting field use.
•
Facility Use Equation: An equation which assists the Park Coordinator in allocating facility use
for organized sporting events. This equation (described further in this document) sets forth the
maximum allocation of facility time available to each organization for all athletic events. •
Non - Organized Activity /Users /Events: Users of the parks or facilities
outside of any connection with the sports organizations, such as school
groups, family reunions, etc.bLiSinesseS?
Nonprofit Organization: An organization that meets the requirements of Minnesota State Statutes
as a Public Service Group and is defined as a group organized to provide a public service to the
entire community for all individuals in the community within the age group being served.
Organized Activity /Users /Events: Any activity or event whose
participants are part of a sports organization or wou d this itichide school
organized activity 1 il�c tennis, cross coutitTy` ?`>
Preseason Coordination Meeting: A meeting, hosted by the City of Shorewood, prior to the
anticipated seasons of activities between the City Staff, City of Shorewood Park Coordinator, and,
sports organizations, nonprofit groups and non - organized groups who are requesting dedicated use
of facilities. The purpose of this meeting is to outline polices and regulations for requests and
scheduled use of the facilities, and to address questions, concerns, or issues associated with field use
or schedules. All organizations or groups requesting dedicated facility usage shall have a
representative at the preseason Coordination meeting. Failure of a representative to attend this
meeting shall result in loss of dedicated field time for the entire season.
It is anticipated that Preseason Coordination meetings will be conducted as follows:
♦ Spring and Summer Events: Sometime between December and March preceding the spring
sporting season
♦ Fall and Winter Events: Sometime between May through July preceding the fall
sporting season
♦ Other preseason coordination meetings may be conducted, should event schedules dictate.
Sports Organization: An Organization registered with the City of Shorewood Park and Recreation
Coordinator and has successfully filed with the City of Shorewood a copy of the bylaws with which
they are governed, appropriate certificates of insurance, fees, and team rosters, prior to any field
use.
Tournament Permit: Permit required for all activities involving a succession of activities falling
within a defined period outside of the normal game or practice times allocated for the organization.
2. CATEGORIZATION OF FACILITIES
The City of Shorewood owns and operates athletic, non athletic, and passive use type facilities. To
assist with the administration of these facilities, each one has been placed in a category shown
below.
i Category 1 Facilities: Athletic Facilities
Little League ball diamonds
Babe Ruth ball diamonds
Softball diamonds
Soccer fields
Football fields
Hockey rinks
Free skating rinks
Tennis courts
Volleyball courts
Skate park facilities
Category 2 Facilities: Non Athletic Facilities
Park Shelters and Multi -Use Buildings
Playgrounds
City of Shorewood Parking Lots
Category 3 Facilities: Passive Use
IS Open Park Space for events
Trails ? ? ??
P
3. AVAILABILITY OF FACILITIES
Facility Description
Available From
To
Softball Fields
April 1
August 31
Babe Ruth Field
April 1
August 31
Little League Fields
April 1
August 31
Soccer Fields
April 1
October 20
Football Fields
August 1
October 31
Hockey Rinks
December 20
February 15
Free Skating Rinks
December 20
February 15
Open Spaces
Year Round
Year Round
Playgrounds
April 1
October 31
Skate Parks
May 1
October 31
Park Shelters
Year Round
Year Round
Volleyball Courts
May 1
October 31
Tennis Courts
May 1
October 31
Parking Lots
Year Round
Year Round
Shouldn't this availability schedule be adjusted to reflect
actual usage? Or should the schedules for the sports orgs
reflect the availability of this table? For instance, TBR used
the fields until 10/16, STLL until 10/3, etc. I agree the :schedule
should be reflective of actual usa ge.
4. PRIORITIZATION OF FACILITY USE REQUESTS
As stated, the intent of this policy is to grant all users the opportunity to utilize facilities within a
managed and predictable manner. Facility allocations shall be evaluated first by the type of request
(or need) received, in. accordance to the "Category of Facility" outlined previously within this
document, and then by the prioritization schedule listed below
Prioritization for Category 1 Facilities:
Note: Throughout the priority schedule, regularly scheduled activities shall take precedence
over scheduled tournament activities.
♦ Priority 1: Field resting time
♦ Priority 2: Non - organized activities and organized activities within the predetermined
time allocations.
0
•
♦ Priority 3: School District 276 Programs (examples curriculum programs, interscholastic •
team practices, etc.)
♦ Priority 4: Non profit Organizations located within the South Lake Minnetonka
3
Communities
♦ Priority 5: Business or service organizations located within the South Lake Minnetonka
• Communities
♦ Priority 6: All other requests falling outside of priorities 1 -5 defined above shall be
considered by forinal request.
Prioritization for Category 2 and 3 Facilities:
♦ Priority 1: Resident request on first come first served basis
♦ Priority 2: Organized activity previously registered with the City of Shorewood Park
Coordinator.
♦ Priority 3: Non - resident request on a first come first served basis.
5. MAXIMUM FACILITY USE EQUATION
The intent of this equation is to provide allocations of time for Category 1 facilities in a uniform and
nondiscriminatory manner. Therefore, the City of Shorewood has compiled an equation to
determine the maximum time that is to be allocated to any organization for initial facility
assignments for seasonal use.
The maximum number of initial Facility Time Periods (MTPs) available to any team is based upon
the following equation.
Variables:
Equation:
P = Average Number Kids Per Team in Organization
T = Total Pop. Vying for Field Use
TS = Time Slots
MTP = ( FITS per Wk)( #of Teams in Org)
T
While using the Maximum Facility Use Equation as a starting point, the Park Coordinator has the
authority to increase the MTP for any one organization, providing that a separate organization has
indicated that an equivalent amount of their allocated time is not going to be utilized.
This equation is based upon the following assumptions:
♦ All turf areas are to be "rested" the equivalent of one day per week.
is ♦ Facility Time Periods are based upon 1.5 -hour time periods.
♦ Times may be further limited based upon the occurrence of limited parking or other facility
demands.
».
♦ The Maximum Facility Use Equation will arrive at a decimal equivalent as to the maximum
time allotted per activity. The final maximum time slots shall be rounded down.
♦ The Maximum Facility Use Equation is evaluated "Per Activity." The Park Coordinator has the •
authority to adjust scheduling based upon compatibility between two events occurring
simultaneously, or other facility limitations.
6. Process for Requesting Field Use for Each Season
The City of Shorewood welcomes all persons interested in utilizing park space and/or field usage.
In order to establish an objective non - discriminatory manner in which all parties interested in using
the City's parks can be facilitated, it is important to follow the listed procedures below.
1. Contact the City of Shorewood City Hall, Park Secretary at 952.474.3236.
2. Depending on group needs and at the direction of the City Hall Staff, contact the Park
Coordinator. For the 2004 -2005 Sporting Seasons, contact Kristi Anderson or Sally
Keefe of Community Rec. Resources at 612.743.4124, for further information regarding
documentation needed by the City prior to field usage of any kind.
3. If group is classified as organized activity or sports organization, turn in the following
requested documentation prior to any park usage:
• Certificate of insurance for the year the organization is wishing to utilize park
space
Facility Use Agreement •
Memorandum Agreement
If group is a sports organization the following additional information must also be
submitted to the City prior to field usage of an kid:
• Complete rosters of all participants within the organization utilizing City park
facilities
• Sports Data Sheet
• User fees in full
Should the requested documentation not be made available to Community Rec. Resources
prior to the designated deadline for completion, absolutely no field usage shall take place until
such time as completed documentation has been received and approved by Community Rec.
Resources Staff, and written notification of approval received by the applicant.
4. City Hall Staff or Community Rec. Resources Staff will notify applicant in writing of
park usage times allotted for activity. Modifications to that allotted time may be made at
the sole discretion of City Staff or Community Rec. Resources Staff at any time based
on the Prioritization of Facility Use Requests section and in accordance with the
Maximum Facility Use Equation, if applicable, as described earlier in this document.
5. Any questions regarding this process should be directed to Community Rec. Resources •
Staff members Kristi Anderson or Sally Keefe at 612.743.4124.
LM
Think you in advance for making application to the City of Shorewood for park usage. The City of
Shorewood wishes you all the best in maximizing your park experience!
0
rol
•
(:I "fY OF
SHOREWOOD
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD • SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 -8927 • (952) 474 -3236
FAX (952) 474 -0128 • www.ci.shorewood.mn.us • cityhaI1 @ci.shorewood.mn.us
MEMORANDUM
TO: Park Commission
Craig Dawson, City Administrator
FROM: Larry Brown, Director of Public Works
DATE: October 29, 2004
RE: Discussion Regarding Off Leash Dog Park
Carver County
On September 28` 2004, Mr. Lenny Schmitz, of Carver County Parks, appeared before the Park
Commission to gauge support from local cities for an off leash dog park in Lake Minnewashta
Regional Park. During this meeting, a few residents chose to address the Park Commission, both in
® support of and in opposition for the project.
It would appear that there are a group of individuals who oppose the project, since designation of a
specific area would actually reduce the area available to them presently. Currently, it would appear
that there are many who utilize the entire park as an off leash dog park.
Conversely, support for such a project is high. The issue that is difficult to determine, at this time, is
trying to gauge the numbers for support or opposition. Staff has tried to contact Mr. Schmitz to obtain
data or feedback as to the magnitude of each group. Having not been able to reach Mr. Schmitz, Staff
will report any feedback received at Tuesday's Park Commission meeting.
Tuesday's meeting is an opportunity for Commissioners to discuss support or concerns for the project,
and determine the next desired step in the process.
0
4111,® PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
, , r t 9
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD • SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 -8927 • (952) 474 -3236
FAX (952) 474 -0128 • www.ci.shorewood.mn.us • cityhaI1@ci.shorewood.mn.us
•
TO:
FROM
DATE:
RE:
Park Commission
Larry Brown, Director of Public Works t
October 29, 2004
Concession Stand Reports
The Park Commission requested a more detailed report form the
concessionaire of Eddy Station.
Attached are the spreadsheets provided by the vendor for last season.
61m
f ® ,® PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
Cash Repeipts by date
t
b ginning Cash
Penns
Beginnin
g Cash
5/8/04
$125.00
5/9/04
$194.25
$0.05
5/10/04
$225.00
$0.05
5/11/04
$225.00
$0.10
5/12/04
$225.00
$0.15
5/13/04
$225.00
5/14/04
$225.00
$0.10
5/15/04
$225.00
5/16/04
$225.00
$0.19
Nickels
$1.00
$1.00
$1.70
$1.70
$1.40
$1.25
$1.20
$1.80
$1.90
Dimes
$1.00
$1.00
$2.50
$2,50
$2.00
$3.00
$1.70
$3.10
$3.90
Quarters
$23.00
$19.25
$9.00
$41.75
$31.50
$19.50
$15.25
$18.00
$26.50
Halfs
Dollars
$1.00
$12.00
Total Change
$25.00
$21.25
$13.25
$46.00
$36.00
$23.90
$18.15
$23.00
$0.00
$44.49
$1.00
$5.00
$10.00
$20.00
$50.00
$50.00
$73.00
$30.00
$10.00
$60.00
$102.00
$55.00
$10.00
$400.00
$79.00
$115.00
$70.00
$60.00
$143.00
$145.00
$70.00
$220.00
$71.00
$155.00
$90.00
$120.00
$48.00
$110.00
$30.00
$140.00
$115.00
$75.00
$60.00
$40.00
$225.00
$87.00
$185.00
$50.00
$280.00
$50.00
Checks
$37.50
$15.00
Total Currency
Total Cash
$100.00
$125.00
$173.001
$194.251
$567.00
$580.25
$361.50
$407.50
$578.00
$614.00
$436.00
$459.90
$328.00
$346.15
$305.00
$328.00
$225.00
$225.00
$602.00
$646.49
Cash Receipts
$69.25t_
$386.00
$182.50
$389.00
$234.90
$121.15
$103.00
$0.00
$421.49
Meal Deal Discounts
$1.50
$0.50
Coupons Redeemed
Treat Tix Sold
$5.00
$0.00
$3.50
$65.00
$1.00
$37.50
$0.50
$126.25
$13.75
$27.50
$108.75
Treat Tix Redeemed
$0.00
$41.25
$12.50
$92.50
$12.50
$25.00
$105.00
xpected Register Sales
Actual Register Sales
$64.25
$382.50
$181.50
$388.50
$234.90
$247.25
$0.15
$121.15
$120.25
$0.90
$103.00
$127.75
$0.25
$0.00
$0.00
$421.49
$527.75
-$1.26
Excess Cash for DeE2
$355.25
$182.50
$389.00
$234.90
$121.15
$103.00
$0.00
$421.49
Repay Starting Cash
- $125.00
$230.25
$182.50
$389.00
$234.90
$121.15
$103.00
$0.00
$421.49
Number of Sales
141
62
69
313
Dollars per sale
$1.75
$1.94
$1.85
$1.69
Non - taxable Sales
$56.75
$22.25
$56.50
$191.75
Taxable Sales
$190.50
$98.00
$71.75
$336.00
Voids
Coupons
Tax Due on Sales
Net Sales after Tax
1
$11.26
$234.49
$5.82
$114.43
$4.15
$123.601
$0.00
$19.46
$508.29
•
ginning Cash
Penns
5/17/04
$225.00
5/18/04
$300.00
5/19/04
$300.00
$0.24
5/20/04
$300.00
5/24/04
$250.00
5/25/04
$250.00
5/26/04
$225.00
5/27/04
$225.00
5/28/04
$2.25.00
Nickels
$0.65
$0.80
$0.95
$0.70
$0.30
$0.30
$0.75
Dimes
$1.10
$1.70
$1.80
$0.80
$0.20
$0.20
$0.40
Quarters
$29.75
$17.50
$27.50
$26.75
$22.25
$29.75
$15.50
$6.50
Halfs
$0.50
Dollars
$51.00
$57.00
$46.00
$81.00
$44.00
$25.00
Total Change
$31.50
$71.50
$87.49
$74.25
$103.75
$74.25
$41.65
$0.00
$6.50
$1.00
$5.00
$97.00
$125,00
$110.00
$170.00
$104.00
$120.00
$68.00
$130.00
$73.00
$110.00
$116,00
$135.00
$104.00
$55.00
$225.00
$225.00
$10.00
$40.00
$70.00
$50.00
$50.00
$20.00
$90.00
$60.00
$20.00
$40.00
$280.00
$100.00
$140.00
$40.00
$140.00
$240.00
$50.00
$100.00
Checks
Total Currency
$302.00
$630.00
$374.00
$388.00
$243.00
$581.00
$459.00
$225.00
$225.00
Total Cash
$333.50
$701.50
$461.49
$462.25
$346.75
$655.25
$500.65
$225.00
$231.50
Cash Receipts
$108.50
$401.50
$161.49
$162.25
$96.75
$405.25
$275.65
$0.00
$6.50
Meal Deal Discounts
$0.50
$2.50
$0.50
$1.00
Coupons Redeemed
Treat Tix Sold
$71.25
$11.25
$15.00
$118.75
$15.00
Treat Tix Redeemed
$72.50
$11.25
$10.00
$78.75
$15.00
Expected Register Sales
Actual Register Sales
$108.50
$109.25
-$0.75
$401.50
$473.25
$0.75
$161.49
$172.75
-$0.01
$162.25
$171.75
$0.50
$96.75
$98.75
-$2.00
$405.25
$483.75
$0.25
$275.65
$291.00
-$0.35
$0.00
$0.00
$6.50
$6.50
$0.00
Excess Cash for Deposit
$33.50
$401.50
$161.49
$212.25
$96.75
$430.25
$275.65
$0.00
$6.50
Repay Starting Cash
$33.50
$401.50
$161.49
$212.25
$96.75
$430.25
$275.65
$0.00
$6.50
Number of Sales
72
251
1111
87
72
247
158
7
Dollars per sale
$1.52
$1.89
$1.561
$1.97
$1.37
$1.96
$1.84
#DIV /0!
$0.93
Non - taxable Sales
Taxable Sales
$25.25
$84.50
$180.00
$295.75
$49.75
$123.00
$50.75
$121.50
$15.50
$83.25
$200.75
$284.00
$89.00
$202.001
$1.50
$5.00
Voids
Coupons
Tax Due on Sales
$4.95
$17.15
$7.191_
$7.13
$4.93
$16.52
$11.90
$0.28
Net Sales after Tax
$104.30
$456.10
$165.561
$164.621
$93.82
$467.23
$279.10
$0.00
$6.22
0
ginning Cash
Penns
5/29/04
$225.00
5/30/04
$225.00
5/31/04
$225.00
6/1/04
$225.00
6/2/04
$225.00
$0.12
6/3/04
$250.00
$0.04
6/4/04
$225.00
$0.05
6/5/04
$225.00
6/6/04
$225.00
6/7104
$225.00
Nickels
$1.001
$0.90
$0.60
$0.60
$0.35
Dimes
$2.90
$2.80
$2.10
$1.40
$0.20
Quarters
$20.75
$31.00
$15.75
$4.50
$12.75
Halfs
Dollars
$10.00
$60.00
$37.00
$1.00
$34.00
Total Change
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$34.77
$94.74
$55.50
$0.00
$7.50
$47.30
$1.00
$117.00
$55.00
$78.00
$145.00
$80.00
$5.00
$225.00
$225.00
$225.00
$225.00
$115.00
$125.00
$100.00
$225.00
$130.00
$100.00
$10.00
$50.00
$50.00
1
$50.00
$20.00
$260,001
$200.00
$200.00
$540.00
$140.00
$50.00
Checks
$7.25
$6.75
$10.00
Total Currency
$225.00
$225.00
$225.00
$225.00
$549.25
$386.75
$428.00
$225.00
$825.00
$370.00
Total Cash
$225.00
$225.00
$225.00
$225.00
$584.02
$481.49
$483.50
$225.00
$832.50
Cash Receipts
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$359.02
$231.49
$258.50
$0.00
$607.50
$192.30
Meal Deal Discounts
Coupons Redeemed
Treat Tix Sold
$12.00
$1.25
$172.50
Treat Tix Redeemed
$13.00
$2.50
$150.00
xpected Register Sales
Actual Register Sales
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
1
$0.00
$359.02
$375.50
$231.49
$234.00
$258.50
$257.75
$0.00
$607.50
$755.25
$192.30
$191.00
$0.00
$0.001
$0.00
$0.00
-$3.48
-$0.01
$0.75
$0.00
$2.25
$1.30
Excess Cash for Deposit
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$439.02
$256.49
$258.50
$0.00
$607.50
$192.30
Repa Starting Cash
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$439.02
$256.49
$258.50
$0.00
$607.50
$192.30
Number of Sales
219
125
162
392
124
Dollars per sale
#DIV /0!
#DIV /0!
#DIV /0!
#DIV /0!
$1.71
$1.87
$1.59
#DIV /0!
$1.93
$1.54
Non - taxable Sales
$102.50
$61.75
$63.25
$367.75
$48.75
Taxable Sales
$273.00
$172.25
$194.50
$387.50
$142.25
Voids
Coupons
Tax Due on Sales
$16.03
$10.15
$11.41
$22.41
$8.20
Net Sales after TaxI
$0.00
$0.00
$0.001
$0.00
$359.47
$223.85
$246.341
$0.00
$732.84
$182.80
6/8/04
6/9/04
6/10/04
6/11 /04
6/12/04
6/13/04
6/14/04
6115/04
6/16104
ginning Cash
$225.00
$225.00
$225.00
$225.00
$225.00
$225.00
$225.00
$225.00
$225.00
Penns
$0.05
$0.05
1
$0.15
Nickels
$0.40
$0.45
$1.60
$0.40
$0.50
$0.30
Dimes
$1.30
$1.50
$4.10
$0.70
$4.50
$0.30
Quarters
$15.00
$28.75
$18.75
$28.25
$11.75
$17.25
Halfs
Dollars
$26.00
$23.00
$25.00
$3.00
Total Change
$42.75
$0.00
$53.75
$0.00
$0.00
$24.45
$54.50
$19.75
$17.85
$1.00
$159.00
$61.00
$158.00
$72.00
$141.00
$80.00
$5.00
$160.00
$225.00
$85.00
$225.00
$225.00
$120.00
$120.00
$185.00
$90.00
$10.00
$90.00
$30.00
$40.00
$30.00
$10.00
$40.00
$20.00
$80.00
$100.00
$300.00
$140.00
$360.00
$220.00
$50.00
$52.00
Checks
$16.50
$46.25
Total Currency
$557.50
$225.00
$276.00
$225.00
$225.00
$664.25
$362.00
$696.00
$430.00
Total Cash
$600.25
$225.00
$329.75
$225.00
$225.00
$688.70
$416.50
$715.75
$447.85
Cash Receipts
$375.25
$0.00
$104.75
$0.00
$0.00
$463.70
$191.50
$490.75
$222.85
Meal Deal Discounts
Coupons Redeemed
Treat Tix Sold
$65.00
$112.501
$100.00
$15.00
Treat Tix Redeemed
$71.25
$115.001
$1.25
$101.25
$15.00
Expected Register Sales
Actual Register Sales
$375.25
$433.25
$0.00
$104.75
$104.75
$0.00
$0.00
$463.70
$579.50
$191.50
$192.75
$490.75
$586.00
$222.85
$238.00
$13.25
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
-$0.80
$0.00
$6.00
-$0.15
Excess Cash for Deposit
$375.25
$0.00
$104.75
$0.00
$0.00
$463.70
$191.501
$490.751_
$222.85
Repay Starting Cash
$375.25
$6.661
$1 04.75
$0.00
$0.00
$463.70
$191.501
$490.75
$222.85
Number of Sales
242
51
301
110
313
125
Dollars per sale
$1.79
#DIV /0!
$2.05
#DIV /0!
#DIV /0!
$1.93
$1.75
$1.87
$1.90
Non - taxable Sales
$150.50
$20.75
$242.50
$45.00
$230.00
$67.00
Taxable Sales
$282.75
$84.00
$337.00
$147.75
$356.00
$171.00
Voids
Coupons
Tax Due on Sales
$16.46
$4.98
$19.60
$8.71
$20.74
$10.0
Net Sales after Tax
$416.791
$0.00
$99.77
$0.00
$0.00
$559.90
$184.04
$565.261
$227.98
0
6/17/04
6/18/04
6/19/04
6/20/04
6/21 /04
6/22/04
6/23/04
6/24/04
6/25/04
6/26/04
ginning Cash
$225.00
$225.00
$225.00
$275.00
$225.00
$275.00
$225.00
$225.00
$225.00
$225.00
Penns
$0.031
$0.05
$0.30
Nickels
$0.70
$0.60
$0.85
$1.45
$0.35
$0.30
$0.55
Dimes
$1.20
$1.00
$2.60
$160
$1.80
$1.20
$1.20
Quarters
$19.25
$34.25
$31.25
$21.25
$18.25
$7.75
$19.00
Halfs
Dollars
$22.00
$62.001
$23.00
$51.00
$53.00
$23.00
$14.00
Total Change
$43.15
$97.881
$0.00
$57.75
$77.60
$73.40
$32.25
$34.75
$0.001
$0.00
$1.00
$107.00
$22.00
$165.00
$68.00
$139.00
$158.00
$75.00
$5.00
$135.00
$80.00
$225.00
$135.00
$105.00
$120.00
$130.00
$115.00
$225.00
$225.00
$10.00
$30.00
$30.00
$10.00
$110.00
$80.00
$60.00
$20.00
$160.00
$60.00
$300.00
$100.00
$160.00
$160.00
$100.00
$50.00
$50.00
$2.00
Checks
$4.50
$25.00
$13.75
$5.75
Total Currency
$402.00
$196.50
$225.00
$705.00
$283.00
$544.75
$528.00
$355.75
$225.00
$225.00
Total Cash
$445.15
$294.38
$225.00
$762.75
$360.60
$618.15
$560.25
$390.50
$225.00
$225.00
Cash Receipts
$220.15
$69.38
$0.00
$487.75
$135.60
$343.15
$335.25
$165.50
$0.00
$0.00
Meal Deal Discounts
Coupons Redeemed
Treat Tix Sold
$128.75
$0.00
$63.75
$16.25
Treat Tix Redeemed
$130.00
$0.00
$67.50
$16.25
xpected Register Sales
$220.15
$69.38
$0.00
$487.75
$135.60
$343.15
$335.25
$165.50
$0.00
$0.00
Actual Register Sales
$218.50
$69.25
$617.00
$135.50
$394.86
$349.75
$164.50
$1.65
$0.13
$0.00
$0.75
$0.10
$15.79
$1.75
$1.00
$0.00
$0.00
Excess Cash for Deposit
$220.15
$69.38
- $50.00
$537.75
$85.60
$393.15
$335.25
$165.50
$0.00
$0.00
Re Starting Cash
$220.15
$69.38
- $50.00
$537.75
$85.60
$393.15
$335.25
$165.50
$0.00
$0.00
Number of Sales
128
39
333
82
225
187
99
Dollars per sale
$1.71
$1.78
#DIV /0!
$1.85
$1.65
$1.75
$1.87
$1.66
#DIV /0!
#DIV /0!
Non - taxable Sales
$73.25
$15.50
$246.75
$29.75
$162.25
$76.25
$56.50
Taxable Sales
$145.25
$53.75
$370.25
$105.75
$247.001
$273.50
$108.00
Voids
1 1
Coupons
Tax Due on Sales
$8.51
$3.17
$21.55
$6.21
$14.39
$16.06
$6.34
Net Sales after Tax
$209.99
$66.08
$0.00
$595.45
$129.29
$394.86
$333.69
$158.16
$0.00
t
$0.00
1
1
-
0
7/04
6/28/04
6/29/04
6/30/04
7/1/04
25.00
$225.00
$192.55
$160.00
$145.00
$0.94
$0.10
$1.30
$0.30
$0.70
$1.45
$2.10
$1.60
$3.80
$2.80
$34.25
$13.75
$25.00
$22.50
$33.00
$9.00
$2.00
$0.00
$71.59
$15.65
$38.50
$28.85
$91.00
$64.00
$4.00
$48.00
$225.00
$150.00
$120.00
$100.00
$120.00
$60.00
$10.00
$40.00
$50.00
$40.00
TI 40.00
$260.00
$120.00
$225.00
$341.00
$334.00
$404.00
$338.00
$225.00
$412.59
$349.65
$442.50
$366.85
$0.00
$187.59
$157.10
$282.50
$221.85
$9,628.61
$1,297.00
$1,159.25
$137.75
$0.00
$187.59
$157.10
$282.50
$221.85
$187.00
$157.00
$282.50
$220.25
$9,573.86
$0.00
$0.59
$0.10
$0.00
$1.60
$0.00
$220.04
$204.65
$297.50
$366.85
$0.00
$220.04
$204.65
$297.50
$366.85
121
85
162
135
#DIV /0!
$1.55
$1.85
$1.74
$1.63
$45.50
$53.25
$55.00
$79.25
$3,232.75
$141.50
$103.75
$227.50
$141.00
$6,360.501
$9,593.25
$8.33
$6.11
$13.39
$8.24
$371.75
$0.00
$178.67
$150.89
$269.11
$212.01
$9,215.00
0
Page 1
Register
Co de
Categor
Item I AvWeekly # weeks
(by r%vg Sold Sales Remainin
Candy
1 00
ML
3
9_ l
C andy
_13
1 01
A ir H
_
11 r
37
-
- - _ Ga -
-
- - -- - - -
_ 1 23 :,
0. 05
Ca nd y
y
Ca
1 0 3 ;Al ms
104
Blow
— 2 8
6 j
_ 2 16.00
24
0.25
Can
Can
-
_
105 j
--
10 6
Kit K
TL affy
2
8�
_ -- 4
95
0.23
-
_ _
Candy
_
M &N -
-- 3
- 9
1.81
_107
108M
&N
2
7
- - Candy
C andy
109
Mi lky
3
9
__-
-
Candy
j
;Pixy
6
Can dy
Candy
_11
111
112
r Pusi -
Red
-- _3
5
2
15 _
4
0.48
-
C
Cand
Candy
Candy
113
1
11
R ee:
Ring
Sal tc
_
3 9 (0.1
8 3 0.40
2 6 0.18
- 6 j - - - - 26_ - -- 0.08
Ca ndy
117 ISni
3
13
-
Candy -�
- --
118Sour
5
20 ^_
0_30
Candy
119
S
3
9 I
0. 47_
Candy
1 2 0
Toot:
5 ;
13
1.0 4_
Cand
Candy
-- Candy
1TWi
122 1
123
-
Nerd
[ (o c
4
-
3
2
_- 12 7.49
- --
12 0.08
6 - - --
- - - - -
Candy
Cand �
y
1
125
Bub t
- -- 4 �
7 �
-
-
_ --
Air H 4 5
1 .56
Drinks, Cold
!
2 jAppl
- --
1
- - -- --
3
1.14
Drin Cold
202 iCo
- -
2 1
5 j 10.73
Dr inks, Cold
203
CokE
2
_ _
8 1
8.63
Drinks, Cold
1 - _2_04_
Diet
_
6
26
1.18
Dr inks, Cold
Drinks, Cold
205
206
Diet
Fra
3
2
11
3
2.91
2.67
Drinks, Cold
Drinks, Co ld
Drinks, Col
20
208
209
Ga tc
Gatc
Gato
3_
2
4
12 0.17
9 -
15 0.14
Drinks, Cold -
10
Grak
2
3 l i
0.35
Drinks, Cold
211
'; N
17
_
77
(0.19)
Drinks, Cold
old
212
— Iced --- -
1
4
8.77
Drinks, Cold
213
Lemr
2
7�__
3. 2_5
Drinks, Cold
214
Moui
-
3 1
11 ;
9.98
Drinks, Cold
!
215
Orar
1
1
19. 43
Drinks, Cold
216
PepE
- 2 �_
7
9.
Dri nks, Cold
Drinks, Cold
217
218
-
Pro
; Pro
__ 2
6 �
6
Cold
219
TSpor
Prop
2
6
_D rinks,
Drinks, Cold
2
- -_
1
j 2
2
-
-_
Drinks, Cold
221
_
ISpor_ 1
Drinks, Cold
�_
222
`Spor
2
� 2
-
Drinks, Col
i_
22 3
Spar
—
2
! 2
-
Drinks, C old
—,---_---------
224
Sprit
1 1 1
4.94
Drinks, Cold
j
225
ianV
2
_ _
3
5. 44
Drinks Cold !
Drinks, Cold
2
227
SFC
1
1 2
2629
Dr. F 3 6
7.06
Drinks, Cold
228
Diet
2
3
8.70
0
•
9
Master Tally Sheet2004
Category
Register
Code
Item Description
(by name, within category) J
Item
Price
Case!
at
Item
Cost,
Orig
Qty,
Cumulative
Purchases
Totals Inventory
Sold' re _ tail va lue
Inventory
_ Value;
Cumulativei
Sales
Avg Weekly # weeks
Max Sold Avg Sold Sales (Remaining
Candy
100
3 Musketeers
$0.75;
36
$0.347
36
71
71 $0.00
_ $0.0
$53.25
7 1 3 j 9 , -
Candy
Candy _
101
102
Air Hea E xtreme _
Air Head
$0.50
$0.25
50
90 j
$0.137]
$0.076'
50 I_
90
299
_ 990 1
299 $0.00
984 $1.50
$0.00
$0.461
$1 49.50
$246.001
__
37 j 11 _ 37 -
101 1 28 123 0.05
Candy
10 3
Almond J
$0.751
36
$0.341
36
36
121 $18.00
$8.191
$9.00
�_ 1 2 16.00
Ca nd y
1 04
_
Blow Pops _
-_
$�
100
'1
$0.065,
1
200 !
194 1 $ 1.50
1
$0.39
$48.50
22 ; _ 6 0 24 0.25
6 ?_ 2 4 0.23
Candy
Candy
10 5
106
Kit Kat
Laffy Taff 3 for_$_25)
y ( I
$0. 75
$0.2 �-
36
165 I
$0. 341
$0.0301_
3 6
330_x_
_ 36
76
35 $0.75`
762 $0.00
$0.34
$0.00
$26.251
$190.50
_
3 3 � $ 95 -
_ -_�
Candy
- --
1 07
_
M &M (plain
$0 .751
48
$0.3
48
92 j
7 $12.75i
$5.841
$56.25
6 3 9 1 1.8
-
C andy
108
_ __
M &M's (peanut)
$0.751 ,
48 i 1
$ 0.344
_
48
'
52
52 $0.00 !
$0. 00 I
$39.00
$54.75
_
5 2 7
_ - --
F77 3 9 _
Candy
109
Milky Way
$0.751
36
$0.
36
73
7 3 1 $0.00��$OAO
- _ =
6
Candy
Candy
Can dy
11 0
1 111 ::Push
11 C
Pixy S tix
Pops _ _
Red Vin
$0175
$0.75
$0.751
50
24
30
$0.1831
$0.299!
$0.271
50
-
30
5
_ 124
30
50 $0.001
117 _ $5.25
30 $0.00
$0.00
$2.09
$0.00.
$37.50
$87.75
$22.50
9 _ 3 l
22 5 L 15 j 0.48
4 _ 2 j 4 -
Candy
1 113
Reeses Peanut Butter Cups
$0.75
36
$0.341,
36
72
73 - $0.75'
-$0.34
$54.75
6 _ 3 9 (0.11
22 8 33 0.40
Candy
Candy
114
1 115
1 Ring Pops _-
Salted Nut Roll
$0.75'
$0.75
40
24
$0.225
$0.315
80
24
2 75
46 j
262 , $9.75
45 1 $0.
$2.92
$0.31
$196.50
$33.75
_
7 2� _ 6 _ 0.18
1
Candy
Ca ndy
Cand
1
117_
118
Skittles
,Snickers
Sour Skittles
$0.75
$0.751
$ 0.75 1
36 (
48
24
$0.344
$0.344
$0.345
36
48
24
212 1
1
1 68
21 0 1 $1.50
100 �__ $0.00
162 $4.
$0.69'
$0.00
$2.07
$157.501
$75.00
$121.50
18 26 0.08
11 _ 3 13 -
1 5_ 20 0.30
Candy
C
119
1
Starburs
Tootsie R olls
$0.75
$0.251
36
1 20
$0.3441
$0 .0621
36
240
72
113
68 , $3.00
100 $ 3.251
$1. 38
$0.81
$51.00
$25.00
5 _ 3 9 I _ 0.47
19 j 13 1 1.04
Candy
12
ITwizzlers
$0. 25
180
$0.031
3 60
18 2_
94 $ 22.001_
$ 2.76
$2 3_.50
- ___5
10 4 12 1 7.49
Candy
122
(Nerd Ropes
$0.751
1 2 4
$0.
96
9 _ $0.75
�
$0.3
$0.0 0.,
71.25
$37.50
_
�- 3 12 0.08
15
6!
_ Candy
Candy
123
- -�
Shoc kTarts
--
Bubble Yum
$0.75,
$1 00,
24
18
; $0. 343 1
$0. 324 1
50
- 55
5 $ 0.00
55
55� $0.00;
$0.00'
55.00
$ 55.00 1
- - - - -- I - - - - - - - -�
12 4 7 1 -
-
- - - - - --
- 124
�
- -- - - - - - --
--
--
-
'',:
- - -- -
9 4 5 1 .56
Cand
y
125
1
Air Head Bubble Gum
$0.75
;- -
18
$0.382
1
4 9
41 $6.00
-
$3.05
$ 30.75
-
- - -_ - -- -- --
i
--- -
! --
-- - --
Apple
0
24
$0.411
48
�
24
2 1 $3.00
-- $1.23
$
- _ - 1 - - - 3 1.14
C
Dunks, o ld
I 201
Juice
1
_ Cold
Drin
Drinks, Cold
202
203
CC ode Re _
'Cake
i _$
$1.25
6
6
$0.403r
$0.417
72
-
L 96
131
41 $68.
63 $85.00
$22.
$28.33
$51.25
$78.75
41 2 _ -- 5 10.73
7 2 8 8.63
Drinks, Cold
_ 204
Diet Coke
$1.251
t
6
$0.41
72
234
204 $37.50
$12.50
$255.00'
15 6 � 26 _- 1.18
11 2.91
Drinks, Cold
--
2
--
Diet epsi -
$ 1.25
_ 6
$0.403
48
- --
j _ _ 120
_ 88 ! $40. 00
-
$12.91
$110.00
8 3
- - - -- -
Drinks, Cold
206
Frappachino -M ocha
12
$0.8
48
( 28
21 $14.
$6.29
$42.00
2 - 1 2.67
Id
Drinks, Cold
Drinks, Cold
2 0 7 _
�208
Gatorade { LL)
�Gat orade (0) _
$1. 5$2 .0 0
0
--
$1.50
24
_ 24 -1
$ 0.554
--
$0 .554
_
48
--
48
96
- -
_ 73
_
� 94 1 $ 3.000
73 MOO
$1.11
$0.00
_ $141.0 _ - -- 01 11 3 12 0.17
- _ __-
6 2 9 I -
9 1 15 1_ 0.14
Drinks, Col
209
Ga torade (FP)
$ 1.50
24
! $0.570
48
_
12
118 j $3.00
_ $1.14
_ $109.5 0,
$177.0 - �4 �
0.35
Drinks, C old
D unks, Cold
210
211
Grape Juice
- -
i Ice Mountain Wa ter
$1.00
--
$1.25;
24
T
28
$0.495
$ 0.246
'
48
178
'
24
� 602
23 $ 1.00
617 ! - 18.75
$ �
$0.50
$3.69
$23.0 3 - 2 1 3 -
$771. 42 17 7 1 (0.19
. -
Dunks, Cold
212
- - - - - --
- -- - - - - --
Te
Iced Tea
- -- - - - - --
$1.25
- _ -�
$0.41 , 36 65
--
31 $42.50
$14.17 _ $38 .75', 4 1 4 , 8 .77
Drinks, Cold
213
1 Iced
I de
--
$1.251
6
$__ - 48 1 83
- -
59 1 $3 0.001
5 7 .5
10 2 32
$73.75;
. 00 ,. - -- -- - - -- - -
�
Drinks, Cold
214
Mountain Dew
$1.251
6
$ 0.40 3 i 72 191
, 8 5 1
i $42.7 $106 _ 11 3 11 i _ 9.
2 1 1 T 19. 43
Drinks, Cold
215
1
Orange Juice
- - - --
$1.00
24
$0.423; 48 i 24
-_- -- - - -r
1251
1 7 1 $1
-- 86 25
$7.181 $7.00 _
$7 0.00 5 _ - -- - --
$ 27.8 2 1 7 9.86
Drinks, Cold
216
Pepsi
p
-)
$ 1 .25
6
$0.403 96
-- - -
56 $
- -- -- -
1 -
- -- - --
Drink Cold
2 17
Pro Fitness Water KS
p --
-
1.50
--
� $1 50
8
8
$0.455 8 ! 49
1 - -- I
_ 8 I 46
I $0.
- - � --
$0.455 8 45
-- -- -
49 1 $0.001
'' 4 1
$ 0.00 $7 3 501 6 j - 2 � -
- - - - --
00! - - 2 - - -- 6 1 '
-
Drin Co ld
- -
218 Propel Fitn ess Water (L)
D unks, old
C
-
219 :Propel Fitness Water B
( )
$1.50
- -'-
--
8
- - --
4
- - - - -- - $0.0
- -- - - - -69
$0 .00 $67.501 6
L - - 2
6 -
Drinks, Cold
220 Sport Blast (Blue)
$ 0.75 1
6
$0.2451 12 18
18 $ 0.001
$0.0 $13 .50, 2
- - --
I 1 I_
- 2 -
Drinks, old
C
221 IS o Blast
- - - -- -- p (Or -- -
$0.75'
6
-
$0.24
12
-
17
- --
17 1,
- --
-
$ 0.00
$0.0
---
1 $1 2.75, 3
- - --
1 2 - _ -_
- - _ _
Drinks, Cold
222 p ort Bl ast (Purp
1
I
12
! 17
17
$0 001
$0 .00!
$1 2.751 3
--
1 2 2 -
_
--
Dunks C old
_ --
' i 223 Sor Blast r ed
P O
$ 0 7 5, ,
6
� 0.2
- --
12
-
1$
- - - --
18
$0 .00
0.00
-i
13.50 � 3
-
$ - 1 - - --
$1 11.25 9
2 2
-- - I - - - -- - - - --
_ 3 i 1 1 4.94
_ - -
-- Drinks, Cold
- - - - --
224 p
-
--
_ -
24
1 14
89
$ -2-1 5
-
$
Drinks, Cold
-- - - - -- --
225 Vanilla Coke
' - -
$1 25 6
$0.4171
41
- --
� 42
-- - --
--
I - - 2 5
- -- -
I $ 21.2 5
-!-
$ 7.081
-
31.25 4
- -- 1. 251 -
� - 2
- - -
3 5.44
- - - -- - - - - - --
- -
Drinks, Cold 226 SFCF Coke
$1. 6
$0.417, �- 14 $57.501
- _ $17.501 -- 3 1 1 1 2 j 26.29
- - -- - - - - -_i
- - i Dr.
Drinks, Cold 227 � Dr. P
- - - - -- _ _60 _ - _
6
1_$0.417 96 51 56
__ $.25
_ -
1 - 7 06
; $ 8.75 $6 3.75 7 3 6 - --
-
$1.25 6
I
- -- - _ -- - _ - --
Drinks, Cold 228 (Diet Dew
- -- - -- - - -- - --
$0.417 48 23 $31.25
$10.42, $28.75 4 ! 2 ! 3 8.70
-- _ -- -
$1.251 6
Page 1
0
•
Master Tally Sheet2004
Category
Register iItem Description 1
Code (by name within c
Item
Price,
Case
Qty,
Item
Cost
Origl
Qty
Cumulative
Purchases
Total Inventory
Sold, retail valu6
Inventory'
Value
Cumulativel
- Salesl
!
Max Sold
Avg Sold
Avg Weekly I#
Sales
weeks
Remaini
Drinks, Cold
229 _C herry Pepsi
Frappachin Vanilla
$1.2
$2 _00
6
$0.4171
- --
$1.000
- 4
3 6 L
24
23 _ $16.251
11 $26.00
$5.42
$1 3.00 1
$28.75
$22.00
3
2
2 �_
1
3 1
1
4.52
9.45
Drinks, C old
230 - _
Dr. Pep
$1. 25 1 ,
6
$0.4171
23 $8.75_
$2.9
$28.
3
2
- 3 1
2.43
Drinks, Cold 1
231 Diet __
=
_30
-
Drinks Hot
301 Coffee (large) _
$1 5050
-
55 �_ - $82.50
1 $72.00
$0.00
$0.00.
$82.501
$72.001
11 1
9 1
3
4�
7
9
(8.00)
(8.00)
Drinks, Hot
Drinks - Hot
Drin ks, Hot
Drinks Hot
302 Coffee (s al) _
_3 Hot Chocolate
304 !Tea
3 05 Decaf Te
$1.00
$1.0
$1.00
$1.00
20
16
$0.166,
160
16
-
-
44
16
72 -
178 - $1 78A0
7 $37.00
8 1 $8.00
$0.00
$0.00
$1.33
$178.00
$7.00
$8.00
42
2
- 2 r
9
- 1 l
1
22 !
1
�- 1
(8.00)
42.29
8 .00
Food Ite
Items
402 Brats -
40 3_ H t Dogs
- - $2 .00
X2.00,
40
14
$0.7_30
$0.741
120
112
1 80 I
4
140 1 $80.001
456 $12.00
$29.19
$4.441
$280.00,
$91 2.00
9
28 I
-_- 4
12 1
18 j
- 57
2.29
0.11
Food
Food Items j
40 5 Nachos
r $1.501
40
$0.760
80
37 8
336 j $63.00
26 -$8.75
$31.92
-$4.30
$504.00
$45.50
33
5
9
1
42
3
1.00
(1.54)
Food Items
Food Items
406 Nachos with Jalapinos
407 Pickles
$1.75
$0.50
_ 30
$0.860
$0.149
60
21
270 1
187 $41.50!
$ 12.40
$93.50
r
6
23
63
3.55
Food Ite
408 Popcorn
$1.00
36
$0.1
1 _
-
506 - $506.00
- $66.48
$50
__2�
37
13
_
(8.00)
_Frozen Treats
Frozen Trea
501 Dove Ba _
502 Free -
$1.50
$0.25
10
200
$0.687
$0.029
-
600
101
83 1 $2 7.00]
3 90 $52.50
$12.371
$6.18
$124
$97.501
9
51
_ _ 3
1 3T
10
49
1.73
4.31
Frozen Treats
_
503 Endulg Bars 1
$ 1.50
$1.00
12
24
$0.657
$0.43
-
-_
` 600
1 8
130
8 $1 5.001
9 3 $37.00
$6.57
$ 15.91
$12.00
$9 3.00
2
1 18
_
5
1
j 10 .00
3 .18
Frozen Tre
Frozen Trea
504 Klon Bars
505 S lushies, Cher lar e
r Y ( 9 )
$ 1.50
C
$ 0.458
_
-
96 - $144.00
-�
- $ 43.98
- - --
$144.00
11
- - --
- -�-
4
_12
12
_ (8 _00)
Fr ozen Trea
_
506 Slushies, Cherry (small)
507 Slus Lemon (large) _
- - 508 Slushies ( L emon ( s all
L )
$1 .00
-_-
_ $_1.50
$1.00
-_
$0.2841
$0.497
- --
-
-
1 _ 472 - $472 .00'1
101 - $ 151.50
_
360 360.
_ -_ _
- $134.
- $50.21
- $110.7
$472.00
$151.50
$360.0
40
12
- - - - - --
30
42
14
- 4�
-- -
11
8
59
13
_45
(8.00)
(8.00
( 8.00)
-
(0.46)
- -- - s
Fro zen Treat
en
-en Treats
Frozen
Frozen Treats
1, 5 09 Snickers Ice Cream Bars
$1.00
18
$0.444
54
} 264
280 - $16.00,
-$7.10
$280.00'_
- -
_35
Snacks
1 601 Beef J erkey
$0.75
24
$0.297
48
48
2 $16.
$6.53
_$19.50
4�
10
_ 2
4 �
- 3
3
6.77
'
Snacks
Snac
602 Cashews
603 Che
-- - --
$0.50
$0.50
24
4
$0.348
! $0.1
-
2 4_
44
24
88
-
j 24 1 $0.001
6 $10.001
$0.00
$3 .63
$12
$34.00
11
9
� -
3
9
9
_
2.35
- 1.86
____
Sn acks_
604 C hex Mix _
$0.50
-
1 30
1 $0 .248
60
90
_
7 8.50
3 $
4.22
$36.50
$72.
17
- --
3
12
-
Sn acks
Snacks _I
Snacks
605 C ookies, Ch oc. Chip
60 6 Cookies, Peanut B
6 07 Doritos _
$0.75
$0 .751
$0.50
_ 33
33
44
1 $0 238
- - - -"
1 $0 .238
$0.181
66
33
44
97
-_ 33�
43
97 $0.00
20 $9.75
43 $0.
$ 0.00
$3.10
_ $0 .00
_
$15.00
$21.50
_ 4
__6
1
2
3
_ 5_
`
- 5.2Q
Snack
Snacks
608 Fritos
609 Gardetto'
$0.501
$ 0.50
4 4
3 6
$ 0.181
$0 .2-46- - j r
1 4�_
36
_17
35
-- - - - - -
17 $0 .00
32 $1.50
$0.00
$0.74
$8.5
_ $16.00
- 4
_ 6
- ?
4
I 0.75
Snacks
1 6 Go urt
1 O g - - - - - --
_ -�
$0.50_
� 24
0.229
9
_
7 f $0 .00 1
�- -
j - - $0. 00_
- - -- $3.50
i, -�
4
- --
2 5
14
1.14
- -
Snacks -
Snacks
-- -'-
t 611 Gold
- -- - - -
612 Gushers Fruit Snacks
$ 0.50
--
$0.50
_
24
28
$ 0.291
--
$ 0.240
-.- 48
56
48
- - - -�
56
42 , $3.00
- -- �
49 I� $3.50
$ 1.75
- --
$1.68
T $21,00
$24.50
- _
I 10
__ -_
2
-
-Il 6
1.1
- --
-
-
44
- --
44
- --
39 $2.50
_
$ 0.91
$19.50
2
j 5
1. 03
Snacks
Snacks
- 613 Lays Classic _-
614 La Sour Cream &Oni
$0.50
- -
$0.50
44
-
4 4
$0.181
�, $0.181
4 4
1 - _
_ -
�_. -
$ $Q
. i
80
$3 3.50
_
-- 1 3
_
-
_ -
r
3
_ 2.51
i
- - - - --
Snacks
- --
6 Peanu
�- - - y - - -- - -- -- --
_ _
$0.
24
0.31
24
- - -
- - -_ - __
20 0'
-- -- -
__
$1
t -
$10.00
- - - -
- - -- -
5
- _2
2
3
_I --
; 1 .60
- --
- --
-
3
-
S nacks
- - -
616 Pistach Nu ts
� -- - - -- - - --
- -
le
0.50
-
$0.5�
24
- --
32
$0 .286
$0.250
24
- - --
64
- -- --
- - - - --
31 $ 0.00
$0.0
-
$0.0
$12
- - - -
5.
$ 150 1 -
_
6�
_ _
2
_ - -I
- 41
-
- --
Snacks
-- - - - - -II
Sna cks
617 Pnn
- - -�- - 9
618 Ric Kris Ba
- - -- Py -- -
- - --
0.50
2�
0.2$
4
- _31
- - --
- - -
-- --
3
-
2
25 _0.00
- 1 $ - --
$
$12.5
-
3
5
j 2.0
__
Snack
61 Slim Ji
$1.0
T
18
, $0.4
54
54
-
$110
43 ..8
- -_ --
$4
- --
$4 3.00
--
- --
- --
-
1
68.80
- -- -
_S
- - -- -
- --
620 St nn C heese
-- --0 g - -- -- - _
��Sunflower
-; - $0.50
-
$0
� 96
_ _ - -
96
--
338
� 10 1 43.00
-- $
- 2541 $42.00
$17.90
- - - - -
$22.391
$5.00'
__ -- - -
$127.00
2
- - - -- 25
, 1
- - - -
7
-
32
-
j 2.65
Snacks
621 Seeds
75
$0.267
150
Page 2
•
CITY OF
S HOREWO OD
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD • SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 -8927 • (952) 474 -3236
FAX (952) 474 -0128 • www.ci.shorewood.mn.us • cityhall @ci.shorewood.mn.us
MEMORANDUM
TO: Park Commission
Craig Dawson, City Administrator
FROM: Larry Brown, Director of Public Works
DATE: October 29, 2004
RE: Park Signage
The Park Commission has expressed an interest in reviewing the overall park signage for the
Shorewood parks.
The existing entrance signs to the park are the red stained cedar posts with wood banners. Lettering is
• routed into the banners and painted yellow. In addition City Hall and the Southshore Senior
Community Center have followed this theme.
Staff has found examples of popular signage from the Internet, to begin discussions of what the Park
Commission would like to consider for this issue. Please feel free to add or bring pictures or drawings
of other signs that may be of interest.
®�® PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER �5
Fairway Stone - Golf Course and Park Entrance Signs Page 1 of 6
wY STONE"�
ENTRANCE NS
Entrance Signs play an important role in establishing an image for your community, park or golf c
Granite is a natural choice for signage. Fairway Stone signs are permanent, attractive and afforda
materials available: Customer List, Granite Color Samples, Installation Guidelines, Lettering Visi
Chart, Granite Bench Specifications. Please don't hesitate to contact us for a Free Design Renderh
0, notation!
Entrance Signs
Available in a variety of sizes and granite shades.
Links At Hiawatha Landing
Distinctive entrance sign for a golf club
in upstate New York. We designed the
sign to frame their logo.
Sign: 6' wide x 4.5' tall x 4" thick •
Granite Color: Silver Cloud
Atlanta Athletic Club
The AAC asked us to design an entrance
sign that fits the character of their
exclusive club.
Sign: 4' circle with 4" rounded polished
edges
Granite Color: Jet Black
Indian Hills Country Club ___________.._.___ •
A bold and simple sign for this country
http://www.fairwaystone.coinJentrance.html 10/26/2004
Fairway Stone - Golf Course and Park Entrance Signs
0
P_j
Page 2 of 6
club.
Sign: 9' wide x 3' tall x 6" thick
Granite Color: Silver Cloud
Chattahoochee Golf Club
A sign fit for a custom base.
Sign: 3' wide x 3' tall x 4" thick
Granite Color: American Black
Oasis State Park
This park sign highlights the setting in
choice of granite color and design. With
polished faces and hand -hewn edges, the
sign rests on an L- shaped base of a
contrasting granite shade.
Sign: 6' wide x 4' tall x 4" thick
Granite Color: Missouri Red
Base: 8' wide x 3' tall x 8" thick
Granite Color: Keystone Blue
Stone Mountain Park
Georgia's Stone Mountain Park called
upon us to revamp the entire park's
signage for the 1996 Olympic Games. At
the park, we have also created a Granite
10/26/2004
http://www.fairwaystone.com/entrance.html
Fairway Stone - Golf Course and Park Entrance Signs
NEW SOUTH
ASSO
ARCHAEOL
ARCHITLC�u�� �
Page 3 of 6
Quary Exhibit (150,000 lbs of cut stone)
and marked all of their Nature Trails.
Sign: 11' wide x 5' tall x 4" thick
Base: 12' wide x 18" tall x 12" thick
Granite Color: Silver Cloud
New South Associates
Unpolished light Georgia Gray ganite
sign with hand -hewn edges provides a
more rustic impression. This base style is
very popular as it enhances the
presentation of the sign.
Sign: 4' wide x 27" tall x 4" thick
Base: 28" wide x 20" tall x 10" thick
Granite Color: Georgia Gray
The Peninsula
This high -end residential development
wanted to make a visible statement with
the size of their sign. Located on a Gulf
coast highway, the sign is readable from
1/4 mile and it weighs 6 tons!
Sign: 24' wide x 5' tall x 6" thick
Granite Color: Flash Black
Ll
Rowlett Municipal Center
The solidity and permanence of granite
makes it a natural for local, state,
educational and federal institutions.
http:// www .fairwaystone.com /entrance.html 10/26/2004
Fairway Stone - Golf Course and Park Entrance Signs
is
0
•
Allen Wilson Terrace
The precise cut of this sign was achieved
by a computer - controlled contour saw.
10/26/2004
Page 4 of 6
Sign: 5' wide x Y tall x 4" thick
Base: 6' wide x 18" tall x 8" thick
Granite Color: Salisbury Pink
Dekalb Park District
The Dekalb Illinois Park District began a
project with us 10 years ago to replace
each sign (40) in their district with
granite signs. They constructed their
bases of formed and finished concrete.
Sign: 6' wide x 4' tall x 4" thick
Granite Color: American Black
Tremont Fountain Park
Pentagonal sign with metallic gold
lettering set directly upon its foundation.
To create the unique shape of this sign,
we created a pattern on our CAD system
and cut the pattern by hand, hammer and
chisel.
Sign: 4' wide x 4' tall x 4" thick
Granite Color: Flash Black
http://www.fairwaystone.com/entrance.html
Fairway Stone - Golf Course and Park Entrance Signs
Page 5 of 6
f
The Decatur Housing Authority (public)
sought a sign that was truly vandal
resistant. •
Sign: 8' wide x 4' tall x 4" thick
Granite Color: Keystone Blue
City of Cornelia
The story of a Vietnam War hero who
earned the Congressional Medal of
Honor is captured on this 2 -sided
monument with both carved and laser
etched artwork.
Sign: T wide x 4' tall x 4" thick
Base: 5' wide x T tall x 12" thick
Granite Color: Galaxy Black
City of Thibodaux, Louisiana
This impressive City Hall entrance sign
with a highly detailed city crest is set on
a poured concrete base.
Sign: 6' wide x 4' tall x 4" thick
Granite Color: Ebony Mist
Accessories II Patented II Il II Request I Request I About
Installation Graphics Customer I Catalog & a Fairwav
http:// www .fairwaystone.com/entrance.html 10/26/2004
[ T ][ 41W
[
1 *1EE
Signs
gnS
Signs
Accessories II Patented II Il II Request I Request I About
Installation Graphics Customer I Catalog & a Fairwav
http:// www .fairwaystone.com/entrance.html 10/26/2004
Sandblasted.com I Custom Dimensional Wood & HDU Signs I Portfolio Sandblasted Entr
•
0
SANDBLASTED
4 5
SANDBLASTED SIGNSr
CNC ROUTED SIGNSu
ROUTED LETTERS 8 LOGOS■
SIGN MONUMENTSo
OTHER SIGN SOLUTIONSm
OUR PORTFOLIO
sandblasted suns
cnc routed signs
routed letters Et logos
lobby displays
specialty
GET AN ESTIMATE®
CONTACT USm
HOMEr
Page 1 of 2
Our Sandblasted Suns ,Portfolio - ENTRANCE
Please Click on an Image for a larger View.
f r0� `
mo
MOUSE DESIGN STUDIO
1264 Alpharetta Street
Roswell, Georgia USA
30075
770 - 518 -0292
770 - 518 -0294 FAX
0
10/25/2004
http:// www .sandblasted.com/portfolioPages /sandblasted /portfolio_Sand Entrance.html
Sandblasted.com I Custom Dimensional Wood & HDU Signs I Portfolio Sandblasted Entr... Page 2 of 2
Y
� nd13471
SIGN DESIGN : AVAILABLE MATERIALS : AVAILABLE FINISHES
copyright@2004 M ouse Design Studio a Sandblasted. corn
•
P
http: / /www. sandblasted. com/portfolloPages/ sandblasted /portfolio_Sand_Entrance.html 10/25/2004
•
Church & School Signs by Montauk Sign Carving Co.
Online Gallery
Click Each Image to See A Larger View
•
P_revio_us P_a.ge. I Next. Page
All photos represent work done in our own shop.
Direct retail projects and designs, as well as work
produced for other sign shops and designers are depicted.
Page 1 of 1
Home
Montauk Sign Carving Co.
4772 South Stephentown Rd.
East Nassau, NY 12062
(518) 766 -5999 Tel.
(518) 794 -8809 Fax.
info(o Email.
u
http://www.signcarvers.com/gallery3.htm
10/25/2004
EFA - Traffic Signs
7N. '
_ Pr u t ihawr,�?sa).
Traffic Sig
Construction S n
Street Na Signs .
Custom Signs
Traffic Accessories,.''
Installation Services
Custom Signs / Decals / Vehicle
Graphics
At Earl F. Andersen, Inc. you'll find we have the expertise to provide most all
custom signs and decals you may need. The possibilities are endless.
Custom signs can be manufactured on reflective and non - reflective
aluminum, steel, plastic, wood, plus other material options. Decals can also
be made from a variety of materials — reflective or non - reflective — small or
large quantities for both indoor and outdoor use. Here are just a few
examples.
Welcome To
K% O N G 'rop
Homu of the
CAIRL)1tYALS
Decals Vehicle Graphics
Phyaitat Therapy
Patient Parking
'
S outh Lilt
'SR
Page 1 of 2
.J
http : / /www.efa- nm.com /tsCustom.html 10/25/2004
Custom Signs
•
•
E
Natural slab signage.
Page I of 2
Sign Information
Base Material
Local native adocite boulder
Copy
Sand carved with color stain
Client
Deer Park
Location
Sparks, Nevada
Notes
Sponsorship plaque inset to offset cost and provide recognition.
Angel Park granite and bronze directional sign
An-gel Park -granite and bronze drop area sign
Ang.g.j.-Pgrk ra. il..n�.,bow.,.slIp.n.d..st�one al.n..1d, bro—nZe #3.-t.ee. s.i.gri.
Other
Angel Park rainbow sandstone and bronze drop area si gn.
............ . ........... ........ .. - .. .. .. ......... ... ..... .. . .............. 1 1-1- 111-11 ... . .........
Can yp.n_Sp rings qgrygO. joca I boulder t
............... 1-1-ee-stgn
Boulder
LQst..CjnyQjjs Course hole #16 tee sign
Signage
Quincy School natural granite entrance sign
Rancho Murieta Country Club hole #5 tee sian
........... ........... --', . .....
The.-Ridge Qo1f..CQurse boulder and bronze #7-te i
Whitehawk Ranch granite boulder #6.,tee,,sig.n
01"d Greenwood Golf Course
Ange�j Park * Golf C ' lub
Brooksi ._Pro fe s sional I ' ' Cnter
* e
G , o * Id M , o resident re i * denti , a l
W"
Mob.a. -K- M1.0ad-oWls, rO ential
Other
.P.l�u�.�m�Ials'.1�Eu..rl.e..Rl.a E-stal-els-
Poppy Ridge ....Go IfI.-C-quIrse.
Entrance
Poppy ,.Ridge Golf Course N.C.G.A. Sign
http://www.sandstormsigns.com/boulder/deerp.html
10/26/2004
Natural slab signage. Permanent roadside entrance signs.
Page I of 2
Sign Information
Base Material
Granite
Copy
Sand carved with color stain
Client
Granite Bay Community Association
Location
Granite Bay, California
Notes
Local native boulder produced on site
Angel Park granite and bronze directional sign
Angel Park granite and bronze drop area sign
.. 1.-.i1 1.11--- ...... .... I ...s......... -- 1.11 1 ................. . I I - ......................... -- -- .-- e ;sj.gjn.
Ange! park ranbow andstone and bronze. te i
Angel Parkrainbow sandstone and bronze droo Q
....... . and area sIg...........
Other
Canyon Springs carved local boulder te
Boulder
Lost C,04 Course. hole #16 tee s
W-ign.
Quincy High School natural granite entrance sign
Signage
Rancho Murieta Country Club hole #5 tee sian
. .. .. .. ......
bronze #7 ....... -- -, 1..", 11-.1-
Tftq Ridge Golf Course boulder and bronze #7 tee sign
W.h..itehawk Ranch granite boulder #6 tee sign
Old Greenwood Golf Course
Deer Park
Angel ParKI-G-olf-Chub
Brookside Professional Center
Other
Q.cj,jjy n.,$prings Golf Cour e
............. .................. .................. -$-.
Gold Mountain * n r. esidential develooment
Entrance
Mo hawk Meadows residential deve'IoD erit
.......... - ................. ... . .... .. ............
Signage
PJV ma-'s Eureka Estates
Ppp-py.-Riclge Golf_ Cpurse
PoppyRidge Go * I * f Course N.C.G.A., Sign
Quincy Junior-Senior High School
40
0
•
http://www.sandston 10/26/2004
The Granite Bay Community Park roadside entrance sign.