050900 PK AgP•
CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD
PARK COMMISSION MEETING COUNCIL CHAMBERS
TUESDAY, MAY 9, 2000 7:30 P.M. OR IMMEDIATELY
FOLLOWING PARK TOURS
AGENDA
1. CONVENE PARK COMMISSION MEETING
A. Roll Call
Lynch Bix
Puzak
Themig
Arnst
Dallman
Young_
Berndt
B. Review Agenda
2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. Park Commission Meeting Minutes of April 11, 2000 (Att.42A Draft''
Summary)
B. Park Commission Work Session Minutes of April 29, 2000 (Att.42B Draft
Summary)
3. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR
4. REPORTS
A. Report on City Council Meeting of May 8, 2000
B. Report on Land Conservation Environment Committee Activities
C. ' Report on Park Foundation Meeting of April 13, 2000
5. REVIEW "TO DO" ITEMS FROM PARK TOURS (Att. - #5 -1999 "To. Do" Items)
6. DETERMINE NEXT STEP AFTER SKATE PARK COMMUNITY MEETINGS
7. DETERMINE NEXT STEP AFTER SMITHTOWN ROAD NEIGHBORHOOD
MEETING
8. DISCUSSION REGARDING SOUTH ENTRANCE OF FREEMAN PARK
9. NEW BUSINESS
10. ADJOURNMENT Council Liaison:
May. Berndt
June: Puzak
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
PARK COMMISSION MEETING
TUESDAY, APRIL 11, 2000
MINUTES
1. CONVENE PARK COMMISSION MEETING
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
7:30 P.M.
Chair Arnst called the meeting to order at 7:35 P.M. A r r T
A. Roll Call
Present: Chair Arnst; Vice -chair Themig; Commissioners Puzak, Dallman, Berndt and
Young; Director of Public Works Larry Brown; Planning Liaison Callies
Absent: Commissioner Bix
Later Arrivals: Council Liaison Scott Zerby
B. Review Agenda
Puzak moved, Themig seconded to approve the agenda as presented. Motion passed 6/0.
D 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Themig moved, Puzak seconded to approve the minutes as presented. Motion passed 6/0.
3. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR
Commissioner Berndt said that a member of the Land Conservation & Environment Committee
has requested that the Cathcart Park tennis courts have a white stripe painted on the practice
board (like the one at Badger Park). Brown will follow up on that request.
Chair Amst introduced Planning Commissioner Paula Callies, explaining that a representative
from the Planning Commission will attend Park Commission meetings when needed. This
meeting will include discussion about a public hearing for the proposed skate park.
4. REPORTS
A. Report on City Council Meeting of April 10, 2000
Commissioner Puzak reported that the Council approved to put out to bid the Freeman Park
multipurpose building with the modifications as suggested, and with bid alternates for a picnic
shelter and for stainless steel fixtures. The Council also voted to put the Vine Hill/ Covington
trail project out to bid.
I=
r
PARK COMMISSION MINUTES
APRIL 11, 2000 - PAGE 2
The Council did not take action on the request to approve a $5 -per- athlete user fee for the sports
organizations. Brown explained that the reason for no formal action is because it requires an i
ordinance draft to be first approved by the Park Commission. (To be discussed under item 10.)
LCEC Report - Commissioner Berndt reported that the Land Conservation & Environment
Committee has been preparing for their April 29 community open house. Also, the Committee is
considering a citywide ban on phosphorus in lawn fertilizers. The Mayor attended their last
meeting and expressed support for that idea. The Committee has been checking with a few other
Cities that have a no- phosphorus policy. On another topic, there were 22 responses to the
question of deer problems within Shorewood. About half were in favor of some type of deer
control and half opposed.
5. DISCUSSION OF PLANNING COMMISSION'S PUBLIC HEARING FOR
SKATE PARK (MAY 2, 2000)
Chair Arnst explained that Planning Director Nielsen recommends that the Park Commissioners
attend the public hearing. All residents within 500 feet of the property will be notified. One
resident has already expressed concern about safety in the crossing of Highway 7.
Planning Commissioner Callies described the public hearing process. Amst said that Nielsen
will put together a staff report and would like to meet with Park Commissioners on April 29
before the Smithtown neighborhood meeting. It will be noticed as a work session.
Themig asked if the kids who are requesting a skate park will attend the public hearing. Puzak ,
asked why this project requires a C.U.P. Brown explained that it is considered a more intensive
use of the land. Puzak asked what the proposal would have to accomplish in order to be
accepted. Callies described the general requirements, stating that there are no specific criteria for
a skate park. The City can add conditions that are appropriate for the use being proposed.
Dallman asked if it is a two -part process —first for the dedication of the land and second, for its
use as a skate park. Puzak asked about zoning of the land. Brown said it is zoned R -2A, which
is Single and Two - family Residential. He further explained that it was formerly interpreted as
just parkland, which is allowed in residential use. It is because of the intensification of use that a
public hearing and C.U.P. are required.
Puzak said the issue seems to be the addition of apparatus and asked if a C.U.P. would be
required if we were adding a swing set. Callies said she is not sure it is just apparatus, but found
no definition in a quick check of the code book to clarify the issue.
Puzak asked what are we doing that is different and how do we prepare. Commissioner Young
reported that he has received calls from neighbors of the property. He said that in the absence of
specifics, there will be negative reaction. Some residents of the Seasons development are not
favorable to the idea of a skate park. In terms of preparation, he suspects that neighbors would
have a concern about parking and about minimal supervision. Puzak didn't think parking would
be a problem. is
PARK COMMISSION MINUTES
APRIL 11, 2000 - PAGE 3
Callies offered to ask for clarification of conditions that would require a C.U.P. Puzak agreed
• that a public hearing is necessary to address concerns, but questioned the purpose of a C.U.F.
Dallman asked if the property has been dedicated as parkland. Brown said it would be a separate
motion to formally dedicate it as parkland. Dallman said that even if it does not become a skate
park, he would still want the site to be dedicated as parkland. Brown said that two meetings ago,
the Park Commission made a motion recommending that it be parkland. Staff has recommended
that it be brought in as full package in the public hearing phase.
Callies will talk with Nielsen for clarification. The Commission will meet with him on Saturday,
April 29 from 10:30 A.M. to 11:00 A.M., which will be noticed as a work session.
Callies added that some of the Planning Commissioners have asked about the possibility of a
future cell antenna at Freeman Park. Themig, Puzak, Arnst and Dallman all expressed support
for that idea as it is on the Park Commission's list of possible revenue sources. Puzak added that
two additional sites may become options —the Highway 7 picnic area pull -off and the picnic area
on the north side of highway 7. Both are high points in the City. Themig added that the Park
Commission would not be opposed and would like to be involved in location decisions.
Brown pointed out that the Planning Commission went through a long process with the
Comprehensive Plan to determine likely sites and it is best to work with those sites first. They
are not locked into those, but should try and make use of the foundation that has been laid.
• 6. CONSENSUS FOR DATES AND FORMATS OF PARK TOURS
Chair Arnst asked if the schedule proposed on the agenda outline will work for everyone and
explained the park tour process to the new Commissioners. All agreed to the May 9 and May 23
dates with June 13 for a rain date.
7. APPROVE LOCATION OF ARBOR DAY TREE TO BE PLANTED ON APRIL
29, 2000 AND DETERMINE TIME
Arnst said she has discussed this with Acting Administrator Nielsen, explaining that some
residents are donating a red oak tree in memory of Cynthia Krieg. City Hall property has been
proposed as the best site, and the exact location and preparation will be up to staff.
The Commission agreed to hold a tree - planting ceremony at 11:00 A.M. on Saturday, April 29.
8. DISCUSSION IN REGARDS TO THE TRAIL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT
PROGRAM (CIP)
Brown explained that this item is on the agenda because the City Council approved authorization
of advertising for bid on the Covington/ Vine Hill trail. With that in mind, he wanted to alert the
Commission to the fact that the last CIP was approved in September of 1999. At that time, there
was a different scenario and trails were a definite part of the picture.
rI
PARK COMMISSION MINUTES
APRIL 11, 2000 - PAGE 4
Brown referred to Page 3 of his memo to point out that this project will drain the trail fund. It is
estimated that it will take until the year 2005 to bring the trail fund balance back up to where it is
now, assuming there is no change in philosophy or approach.
Amst said she thinks the Commission knew that and she is happy to see that some balance will
remain. Brown noted that it is contrary to the last CIP approved by the Park Commission
because the last CIP had a number of other potential funding sources listed. This does not mean
the other projects are out the window, but staff is trying to work with real numbers. Brown said
he wanted to show a reflection of that in this report.
9. FINALIZE FORMAT FOR OPEN HOUSE FOR SMITHTOWN ROAD WEST
NEIGHBORS REGARDING TRAIL/ SIDEWALK SCHEDULED FOR APRIL 29,
9:00 A.M. -10:30 A.M. AT CITY HALL
Arnst explained that Planning Director Nielsen will be available for this meeting and Brown will
try to attend as well. The plan is to display the map, showing the result of the rights -of -way
study and to let neighbors know that the project is a much bigger issue than originally thought.
The Commission also wants to communicate (as they promised to keep residents informed) that
they are still interested in the project and are making efforts toward that end. Arnst said that all
neighbors on both sides of Smithtown Road from the LRT trail to the west end will be noticed.
Brown explained the map and reviewed the results of the study for the Commission, saying that
overall, it was good news for the Council.
•
Themig asked about the intent of the public hearing and if there is a future direction for the
project. Arnst added that neighbors will ask what's next. Brown said it comes down to 2
options — either there will be no trail or we seek MSA funds for a trail.
Berndt asked about individuals who own right -of -way and are opposed to a trail. Brown cited
the example of Mn/DoT, saying even they move on to another project because it is too expensive
and complicated to acquire the land. It may mean we would choose another, unopposed project.
There was discussion about how to address the possibility that some residents may donate their
easement to the City. Brown explained what would have to take place before that could happen.
Dallman added that even donated land will cost the City money, but if this is an option, the City
will need to be prepared to accept it.
Puzak pointed out that MSA funding was part of the picture even before the map was created.
The map didn't lead us to MSA and state funding should not be a new issue. He recommended
going back to basics and simply be honest and open with the facts, both positive and negative.
He said the reason we are having the meeting is to communicate new information about the need
to acquire easement right -of -way on 40% of the area.
Brown clarified which parts of the street easement the City owns. He suggested giving residents
the facts of the research. The question is, if the City is faced with the burden of acquiring
•
PARK COMMISSION MINUTES
APRIL 11, 2000 - PAGE 5
parcels, a trail may not happen. Dallman asked if the road will eventually have to be built with
• MSA funds and Brown said yes it would. There was discussion about the timing of that process
as it relates to a future trail.
Brown asked what is the goal of the meeting. Puzak said, to tell neighbors where we are at and
what it would take to complete a trail along that corridor. If asked what kind of trail, it would be
designed around the issues along with the MSA standard of an 8 -foot width. Berndt said there
will be a lot of different responses between old -time and newer residents.
8:37 P.M. Councilmember Zerby arrived.
There was further discussion on how to handle possible donations of land and the idea of using
roadway funds toward the project. Brown pointed out that there is a tax benefit for donations of
land, which may be a consideration for some people
Arnst stated that the purpose of the neighborhood meeting is to update citizens on where we are.
With that in mind, she asked what information the Park Commission can prepare for the
residents. Themig suggested a simple 1 -page handout that shows where we are, where we have
come from and where it leads.
Brown cautioned that we do not have design plans and can't quantify things. People will want
specifics and it's too early to address those details. He added that it is valid to generate
discussion on the need of the residents' cooperation if it were ever going to work. Themig
is suggested asking the general question of, "Would you be willing to offer land ?" Puzak said he
would also want to explain the probability of an 8 -foot wide trail.
Arnst said she will work with Larry Brown to create a draft and get a copy to each Commissioner
for review before the meeting. There was discussion on how to handle the question of land
donations. The message for now is that the City wants to work with the residents and ask them
for their perception for a trail. Would they be interested in someday donating land? Ask them
how they feel and if this is a project we should pursue.
10. DISCUSS SPORTS ORGANIZATION POLICIES RELATIVE TO USER FEES
Arnst explained that a $5 per athlete charge has been decided upon, but the Commission has
deferred on the question of how to implement the user fee. A plan should be in place before
contacting the sports organizations.
Dallman asked what he should report at the next Parks Foundation meeting. Puzak suggested
saying that the Commission has passed a motion and presented this plan to City Council. Brown
pointed out that the motion was for the City Council to draft an ordinance, which has not been
approved. It's not a done deal.
PARK COMMISSION MINUTES
APRIL 11, 2000 - PAGE 6
Thernig suggested meeting with the athletic associations first and then formalizing the plan with
an ordinance. Arnst said the policy should be finalized before meeting with the organizations. .
Puzak recommended they at least prepare an intended policy to present to the sports associations.
The Commission discussed how the fee would be assessed, collected, and documented and what
to do if anyone does not want to pay. The role of Minnetonka Community Education & Services
in field scheduling and park use also was reviewed.
Brown pointed out that, once the sports organizations have a copy of the new policy, they can
react to it and decide if they wish to use the fields. Arnst added that they do have the option to
play on other fields. Puzak stated that the point is that we are assessing the cost of park
maintenance to each of the organizations. Some will embrace it and some will question it.
There was further discussion about the timing of noticing the sports organizations. It was agreed
to have the policy in place by the end of September 2000. The effective date of the policy
change is yet to be determined. Brown said it would be wise to see a policy draft before
committing to a meeting date. It will require a public hearing. The Commission agreed that
there is plenty of time to work out the details.
11. REVIEW 1999 "TO DO LIST GOALS"
Chair Amst recommended they close out the 1999 list and move to 2000. She asked the
Commissioners what they would like to include on a new list. Ideas were listed as:
• Plastic recycling in the parks.
•
• Implement user fees.
• Meet financial goals.
• Build the skate park.
• Investigate a skating rink at Freeman Park to go beside the new building.
• Continue to meet and communicate with residents.
Puzak reported that Brown has negotiated with the Gas Company to install a gas line to the
multipurpose building at no charge. This allows for economical gas heat and a less expensive
electrical system for lighting, etc.
Brown also noted that a future ice rink location needs to be considered now because of its
proximity to the building plan in order to ensure visibility from inside the multipurpose building.
12. NEW BUSINESS
Puzak asked Councilmember Zerby why a C.U.P. would be required for the proposed skate park.
Zerby asked about the step to first adopt the property as parkland. Puzak said the Commission
has asked, but Council has not taken action. Brown explained that it would probably require a
resolution and both proposals would be incorporated as one package.
1
PARK COMMISSION MINUTES
APRIL 11, 2000 - PAGE 7
Puzak said he is a little concerned about naming it as a skate park because the property has other
. potential. He listed other possible amenities and pointed out that the property is larger than
Silverwood Park. Brown said a request could go to Council at one of the next meetings. Zerby
preferred that it be dedicated as parkland first.
Brown reported that the DNR grant application for the multipurpose building was submitted.
Themig reported that there is a bill moving through committee to dedicate a percent of tax dollars
for natural resources and it has potential to do something for parks. He offered to get the bill
number for anyone who wants to contact his or her representative. This could have a long -term
impact on parks and recreation in the State of Minnesota.
13 ADJOURNMENT
Puzak moved, Young seconded to adjourn. Motion passed 6/0.
The meeting adjourned at 9:17 P.M.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,
Connie Bastyr
RECORDING SECRETARY
4
CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD
PARK COMMISSION WORK SESSION COUNCIL CHAMBERS
. SATURDAY, APRIL 29, 2000 10:30 A.M. TO 11:00 A.M.
MINUTES
1. CONVENE PARK COMMISSION MEETING
Co -chair Amst called the meeting to order at 10:45 A.M. Aid Q
A. Roll Call
Present: Chair Amst, Co -Chair Themig; Commissioners Puzak, Berndt, Bix and Young;
Acting Administrator Brad Nielsen; City Engineer Larry Brown
Absent: Commissioner Dallman
B. Review Agenda
The agenda was accepted as written.
2. DISCUSSION REGARDING SKATE PARK
• • Update From Planning Director Nielsen On Dedication of Rest Area as Parkland
Planning Director Nielsen reported that the deed is signed and the property is established as City
of Shorewood parkland.
• Update From Planning Director Nielsen on Legal Determination of "Equipment" vs.
"Structure" relative to CUP
Nielsen explained that the skate park equipment is considered to be similar to the installation of a
play structure in any other Shorewood Park, and does not, therefore require a Conditional Use
Permit. It is nonetheless important to hold informational meetings with neighbors and affected
parties.
• Plan For May 6th Site Visit
There will be an onsite meeting on Saturday, May 6 at 9:00 a.m. to meet primarily with the
immediate neighbors. The Waterford Shopping Center manager and Holiday Station manager
have been invited as well. There will be an open house at City Hall on Monday, May 8, which
will also include members of the Excelsior Area Chamber of Commerce, Police Chief Litsey,
Waterford neighbors, Superintendent of Minnetonka Schools and others.
Nielsen said the required setback for parking is 30 feet, which suits the location of potential
. parking. He also explained the proposed use of space for the skate park, the landscaping ideas,
WE
PARK COMMISSION
APRIL 29, 2000 - PAGE 2
and 6 or 7 parking spots. He also showed a drawing for possible "phase II" landscaping to buffer
the park and neighborhood from some of the highway noise.
Commissioner Puzak added that there are a few suggestions for preventing numerous trips by •
park users to the Holiday Station across the highway. They are:
1) Not make a bituminous trail surface from the skate area to the highway, but rather a
crushed limestone surface.
2) Restore the water fountain that already exists in the park area.
3) Develop a landscape barrier between the park and highway.
Puzak described some of the structures proposed in the skate park design. Nielsen added that the
materials used in ramps at the Chanhassen skate park (which he visited) are such that noise
seems to be minimized. The Commissioners asked about the use and design of the Chanhassen
park. Nielsen described that setup and explained more about the proposed layout for the
Highway 7 site.
Commissioner Themig asked how concerns of residents or potential problems would be
addressed. Nielsen said that noise from music is one known issue and it is something the Police
Department will have to address.
Commissioner Young said that one of the chief concerns of residents of the Seasons development
is overflow parking. Nielsen said that St. Alban's Bay Road would likely be posted "No
Parking." Puzak added that most of the kids would likely come to the park by foot or bicycle.
There is also potential for additional parking in the wayside rest area on the south side of the
highway. •
• Plan For May 8 th Open House
Nielsen suggested that the more detailed site plan would be available in color copies as handouts.
Puzak asked if the park ' area itself could be marked with tape or paint to show parking and
landscape areas. The open house will be from 9:00 A.M. to 10:30 A.M.
Commissioner Young stated that he is disappointed in that the Commission is at a stage of plans
and drawings before soliciting comments or approval from neighbors. He is hearing incredibly
negative comments from phone calls he has received from neighbors. He has two letters from
residents who will not be at the May 6 meeting and he knows of a petition being circulated.
Young said he is very surprised because the Commission has been much more careful with the
trail process in being sensitive to neighborhood response.
Nielsen said it's kind of a "chicken and egg" situation because it's hard to talk with people about
what is being considered unless you have something to show them. The current plan is just a
concept, not a final by any means. They expect to modify it based on neighborhood concerns,
but it is important that people have something to look at and respond to.
Commissioner Young reiterated that, regardless of design, the basic idea is a problem because of
noise and safety. Themig agreed that residents would need to see that the park would be well S
PARK COMMISSION
APRIL 29, 2000 - PAGE 3
designed and planned around those concerns. Young said he thinks the location is still a poor
choice and the Commission should be prepared for residents to feel the same way.
Puzak explained that the skate ark idea has been a public matter for two ea
p p years and two sites
(Manitou Park and Highway 7), have been on the paperwork every time. He explained the
decision - making process by the Youth Coalition and the Park Commission in the selection of the
Highway 7 site. Puzak added that he thinks the pre- existing highway noise is loud enough to
drown out the skate park noise. Even though we would be adding apparatus, the landscaping will
be an overall improvement for the neighbors and will serve the children as well.
Commissioner Young said they need to be prepared to back off if neighbors all object to the idea
of a skate park in that location. Puzak said he has to hear the arguments and reasons, and weigh
those. Young said some neighbors might not attend the meetings if they think it's a done deal.
He asked if the Commission is prepared to accept rejection of the idea. Puzak said all of the
City's park locations are in residential neighborhoods. What must be considered is the overall
good of the City over one particular street in the City.
Nielsen asked if feedback forms should be made available at the open house. All agreed they
should be included.
Young restated the neighborhood concerns and said it will be hard to convince residents that this
will be an asset in their lives.
. 3. ADJOURNMENT
Puzak moved, Young seconded to adjourn. Motion passed unanimously.
The meeting adjourned at 11:10 A.M.
Respectfully Submitted,
Connie Bastyr, Recording Secretary
Parks "To -Do" List
May 25,1999
(Updated 6/9/99)
Cathcart Park
Done
♦
Needs weed cutting
♦
Three trees need to come down
♦
Magic Square — Going to surface it and Engineer Brown will come up with ideas
and bring them back to the Park Commission
♦
Basketball hoops need to be replaced
♦
Move the sign along Church Road — Similar to Freeman Park, incorporate garden
with a boulder on the right side of the parking lot
♦
Remove metal slide
Freeman Park
♦
Multi- Purpose building (North parking lot)
LB
♦
Proposed batting cage, signs and relocation of storage shed — Engineer Brown
is working with Gordy Lindstrom — Postponed until later in season
♦
Safety netting — Waiting on easement documents signed by the residents
♦
Plant trees
♦
Map for trail
♦
Closure of road along field #2
Crescent Beach
♦ Add sign (joint with Tonka Bay)
♦ Screening around satellite
Badger Park
♦ Resurface tennis court
♦ Straighten gate into tennis court
♦ Picnic table
♦ Remove evergreen
♦ Paint garbage cans — It was suggested that maybe Boy Scouts or Girl Scouts could
paint.CouncilMember Zerby's daughter was going to check with her leader
to see if they could paint the cans and let the Park Commission know.
i�5
Page 2
Tuesday, June 8, 1999
Park Tours
Manor Park
♦ Aerator for pond
♦ Paint the graffiti by the satellites
Wayside Rest Area
♦ Seal the well
♦ Check location for skatepark
♦ Improve the barrier along Highway 7
♦ Check on walkway trail
Done
4
Silverwood Park
♦ Dress up the erosion around the satellites
♦ Plant bushes along the two big slides to stop erosion
♦ Remove the two fence posts by pond (south of the satellite and east of the blacktop trail)
♦ Remove the thistles at the end of the big slides 4
♦ Rubber mat at the end of the two big slides Cancelled ,
♦ Fill in the holes around the blocks (by the swing area)
♦ Small garden area by Silverwood sign ( Zerbys are going to adopt)
♦ Put article in newsletter that Silverwood was adopted by Zerbys
Christmas Lake Access
♦ Check on painting stripes at Christmas Lake access parking lot