03-22-10 CC Reg AgPCITY OF SHORE WOOD
CITE' COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
MONDAY, MARCH 22 2010
1. CONVENE CITY COUNCIL MEETING
A. Roll Call
B. Review Agenda
2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
57 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
7:00 Pm M.
Mayor Lizee
Bailey
Turgeon
Woodruff
Zerby
A. City Council Regular Meeting Minutes, March 8, 2010
3. CONSENT AGENDA - Motion to approve items on Consent Agenda & Adopt
Resolutions Therein:
NOTE: Give the public an opportunity to request an item be removed from the
Consent Agenda. Comments can be taken or questions asked following removal
from Consent Agenda
A. Approval of the Verified Claims List
B. Union Agreement
C. Approval of a Preliminary Plat Extension
Applicant: Bill Erickson
Location: 27930 Smithtown Rd
4. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR
(No Council action will be taken)
5. PUBLIC HEARING
6. REPORTS AND PRESENTATIONS
A. Report on LMCC Activities by Representative Ken Hendrickson
7. PARKS
8. PLANNING - Report by Representative
Minutes
Claims List
Administrator's
CAF
Planning Director's
CAF
Report
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA -- March 22, 2010
Page 2 of 2
11. STAFF AND COUNCIL REPORTS
A. Administrator and Staff
1. Update on Grant Opportunities Staffs' CAF
2. Minnehaha Creek Watershed District rules update
3. February 2010 Financial Report Report
B. Mayor and City Council
12. ADJOURN
CITY OF
5755 Country Club Road f Shorewood, Minnesota 55331 e 952 -474 -3236
Fax: 952474 -0128 ® www.ci.shorewood.mmus @ cityhall@ci.shorewood.mmus
Executive Summary
Shorewood City Council Regular Meeting
Monday, 22 March, 2010
7 :00 p.m.
Agenda Item #3C: Bill Erickson has requested a six -month extension of his preliminary plat
approval in order to resolve a boundary discrepancy within the plat. Staff recommends
approval of a six -month extension.
Agenda Item #5A: There are no public hearings this evening.
Agenda Item #6A: Ken Hendrickson, Lake Minnetonka Communications Commission Board
Representative, will provide a report on recent LMCC activities.
Agenda Item #7: There are no park items this evening.
Agenda Item #9A: As part of the federal Clean Water Act, the City of Shorewood is required
to obtain a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit. The two
main requirements of this permit are preparation of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention
Program (SWPPP) and subsequent annual reports. Tonight's public meeting is required
as part of the permit. There will be a brief presentation outlining the city's SWPPP, items
that will be included in the annual report.
Agenda Item #I OA: Approve a resolution authorizing the application for a sports grant to cover
part of the cost of the Manor park shelter remodeling /addition, and authorizing the
Administrator to execute the grant agreement if the grant is awarded.
Agenda Item #1 OB: The results are in and the deer are up. The Council should direct staff as
to whether the deer removal effort should be reinstated for 2010.
Agenda Item #1 IA. 1: Staff has provided a report of grants that have been applied for, or are
under consideration.
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
CITE' COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
MONDAY, MARCH g, 2010
and Zeby; Attorney Tietjen; City
actor of Public Works Brown; and
present this evening. He related
-the-March 22, 2010, meeting
n passed 4/0.
A. Citv Conrieil .Work Session Minutes, Febtuary 22, 2010
Woodruff moved, Zerby seconded, Approving the City Council Regular Meeting Minutes of
February 22, 2010, as presented. Motion passed 4/0
3. CONSENT AGENDA
Mayor Liz& reviewed the items on the Consent Agenda.
Zerby moved, Woodruff seconded, Approving the Motions Contained on the Consent Agenda and
Adopting the Resolutions Therein.
A. Approval of the Verified Claims List
B. Award Contract for Badger Tennis Courts overlay (This was moved to Item 10.0 on
the agenda.)
CITY OF SH REWO D REGULAR COUNCIL MEEI'I G MINUTES
March 8, 2010
Rage 2 of
C. Adopting RESOLUTION NCI. 10 "A Resolution Making the Appointments of
Thomas Geng (3 -year term), David Hutchins (3-year term) and Sue Davis (3-year
term) to the City of Shorewood Planning Commission" and RESOLUTION NO. 10®
007, "A Resolution Making the Appointments of Josh Trent (3-year term) and
"Suzanne Gaidos (3-year-term) to the City of Shorewood Park Commission".
M otion passed 410.
4. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR
Jerry O'Neill 25540 Nelsine Drive stated he thought it would cost
have watermain extended in front of their properties and hook
experience he did not think that property owners would recover i
property would increase less then twenty percent of the current $10
addition, the property owner also has to pay all the costs assc
watermain into their home. He explained if watermain is p extended
and the owner has not hooked up to city water, the property ov
mortgage company) to hook up to city water prior to clooitg on ti
still functional, the seller would also have to pay the cost to We t
only. If the well is abandoned (i.e., it's no longer in use) the�selld
well sealed by a licensed well driller and have it certified. M'
roperty owners $10,000 - $12,000 to
ap tioU it. Based on his professional
at cost: He thought the value of the
)00 assessment /connection charge. In
iated with bringing water from the
town the street in front of a property
ter would be required (by a buyer's
sale of their property: If the well is
P1 ivetl,water plumbed for outside use
will have to pay the cost to have the
the seller would have to pay any
remaining assessment/connection charges. He, stated he wanted to inake „ sure the City was being forthright
in explaining to property owners the true cost and. benefit of extending and connecting to city water.
5. PUBLIC HEARING
None.
6. REPORTS
A. Report on
District Activities by Representative
Councilmember Woodruff the City's representative on the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District
(LMCD) ,provided a report or `recent Llv P activities.
The highlights bf the report are 'as follows. The LMCD is working on "rebranding” the Save -the -Lake
concept with tle` purpose of rising its image and re- energizing the concept. The Save -the -Lake
Committee received ;$115,000,�in grant application requests, and it awarded $48,500 in grants and
committed $4,000 to ongoxng'LMCD projects. The Hennepin County Sheriff's Water patrol was given
$3,500 for safety equio'in&t. There was $30,000 committed to funding the 3 -Bay milfoil treatment
program for 2010 (this would be year three of a five -year program). The Museum of Lake Minnetonka's
was awarded $15,000 to refurbish Steamboat Minnelhaha. There was $2,000 committed to the Save -the-
Lake banquet and $2,000 for solar lights for buoys. The remaining $6,200 is available to spend on
projects throughout 2010. He noted there is a policy that states only a certain percent of the Save -the -Lake
Fund can be spent each year.
The LMCD held a public forum to solicit input from the public about changes in boat usage and dock
ordinances in the Littoral zone (the shallow water zone) in Lake Minnetonka. The LMCD's Technical
Advisory Committee's (TAC) findings indicate a risk of ecological damage from shading from docks and
CITE' OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUT
March 8,2010
Page 3 of 9
Woodruff noted that the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) denied approval for a milfoil treatment
program for St. Albans Bay and Gideon Bay. He explained if the Lake Minnetonka Association wanted to
reapply for a smaller treatment area the DNR may consider.
Mayor Lizee stated she attended the fortnn, noting the forum was moved from Shorewood City Hall to
the Southshore Community Center because of the high number of attendees. She thought there were over
80 people in attendance. Residents from around Lake Minnetonka expressed they thought the LMCD
TAC had quite a bit of additional work to do before it could make at recommendations. Sl e explained
there has been concern expressed about the Save - the- Lake:Fuiid, It-is' her understanding that only 25
percent of the Fund can be spent each calendar year. Concern had been expressed that $15,000 of the
$48,500 available was dedicated to the Steamboat Minnehaha. Concern had also been expressed about the
LMCD discontinuing the public access video inspection program which records what is going on at the
public launches with regard to AIS. She suggested that further dsbussion by the Save - the -Lake
Committee may be in order. She stated she leas heard that Minnesota, Senator Olson and Minnesota
Representative Doepke have been made aware of.,the DNR's�Acnial for treatment of St. Albans Bay and
Gideon Bay and it is her understanding that they iitert�i,to approaeli�the DNR for reconsideration because
the herbicide treatment program has wprked.
Councilmember Woodraff,stated the and Save -the -Lake Committee discussed the public access
video inspection program extensively.in 2009. Ultimately the LMCD Board decided to field the program
in 2009. He explained that many- pictures were taken..atthe public launches but the LMCD did not have
the resources to conduetthe review the pictures;,>Ie stated the LMCD and the individual supplier of the
equipment `drd not fin& any jing in-'the pictures. There was only one instance where the picture showed
some type of plant life on t1 e boat. The Save -the -Lake Committee thought the payback was extremely
low. Ile alien explained that uhder state l' and DRN policy that type of information cannot be used for
any type of enforcement. The '`aue- the -Lake Committee did not think the cost of $5,000 - $7,000 for the
program in addit;t?p to the cost to review the pictures was worth it and therefore dropped it for 2010.
Mayor Lizee expressed slx' hoped that the remaining $6,200 in Save - the -Lake Funds available for
2010 would be used grnetlhing related to AIS. Councilmember Woodruff stated one of the grants the
LMCD has received in thy; just has been cut back and it's possible that some of the funds could be used to
fund inspections at boat launcI s.
7. PARKS
No report was given because there had not been a Park Commission meeting since the last City Council
regular meeting. A meeting is scheduled for March 9, 2010.
8. PLANNING
CITE' OF SNORE WOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
March 8, 2010
Page 4 of 9
Planning Commission Chair Geng reported on matters considered and actions taken at the February 16,
2010, Planning Commission meeting (as detailed in the minutes of that meeting).
9, ENOINEERING/PUBLIC WORDS
A. Approve Plans, Specifications and Estimate and Authorize Advertisement for Bids
for the 2010 Road Improvement Project for Nelsine Drive, Meadowview Road
Wild Rose Lane
Mayor Lizee stated this evening Council will consider the approval of, and specifications and
advertisement for bids for the Nelsine Drive roadway reclamation project. Council had decided not to
include the extension of watennain as part of this project during a preuius Council meeting. She noted
that the O'Neills ( 25540 Nelsine Drive) and the Svobodas (25580 ,,Drive) had offered to work
with the City about granting drainage and utility easements to help mitigate the drainage issues, and she
thought that would be addressed as part of a bid alternate.
Engineer Landini clarified that the bid alternate was for the drainage and utility easeme' is for drainage
swale offered by the Opfers (25900 Wild Rose Lane) atid,the Masons (5570 Meadowv*�,w `Road). The
Nelsine Drive project does include a drainage pipe th be directionally bored between the
O'Neills' property and the Svobodas' property.
Mr. O'Neill stated he assumed that he and the Svobodas would have to sign easement documents before
any drilling would be done. He asked for some type of assurance that the directional boring would not
damage any trees.
Engineer Landini stated he d d. not have the easeznent' documehls for the O'Neills and the Svobodas
prepared yet. He was waiting-for consensus from the Council before he had them drawn up. He explained
that Mr. O'Neill wanted sane type of guarantee that the one large tree he is concerned about will not be
damaged. He stated they G`ity will ensure the best that can be done will be done to help the tree survive
during construction. Comicilmember $ailey asked what =the guarantee would involve. Landini stated it
could possibly be a replacemit tree; noting that signs'of despair would not be visible for two — three
years. Landitu eplined the directional boring for��he 15 -inch pipe would occur a number of feet under
the tree so: most, if n ' ViL es roots should not be impacted. Bailey questioned what the remedy
would We`" Mayor Lizee stated; she assumed that would be addressed after the project was approved, to
which replied that is correct.
Engineer Lan ni stated the action item for Council to consider this evening is to approve the plans and
specifications; at d to direct Staff to have the necessary easement doeuments prepared for the Masons,
O'Neills, Opfers and" Sobodas ;"He noted that the easement documents for the Opfers and Masons and the
associated drainage sW p s cannot be prepared until the snow cover is off the ground.
Mayor Lizee stated the resolution for consideration is for the Nelsine Drive project and also the
Meadowview Road and Wild Rose Lane project. Engineer Landini explained the only variant between the
two resolutions for consideration is one includes the extension of watermain under Meadowview Road
and part of Wild Rose Lane and the other does not. Landini stated Council could direct Staff to draft
another resolution for consideration at another date.
Mayor Lizee noted the Nelsine Drive project is a reclamation effort, and the Meadowview Road and Wild
Rose Lane project is a reconstruction effort.
CITY F SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING Mt ftJ.rES
March 8, 2010
Page 5 of 9
Councilmember Woodruff stated the estimated costs from TKDA for the eIsine Drive project are
approximately 1.9 times the estimated cost in the capital improvement program (CIP). He asked why that
was. Engineer Landini explained the CIP cost estimate is a forecast based on a 15- year -old project cost.
Some of the constraints are different from the project it was based on. Also, there is very little base under
Nelsine Drive; therefore, a lot of rock will be required to establish a base. The project estimate includes
the cost for storm sewer improvements. That information wasnot available during the CIP planning
process. Woodruff commented that the increase in cost wa:split between storm sewer' improvements and
the improvements to the base of the roadway to stabilize 'the street. He noted Staff had' explained the need
to improve the base to Council during a previous rneeting. Director Brown explame - TKDA, the
engineers for this project, wanted to do a substantial number of.additional borings at a cost of more than
$1,000 each for this project. Staff thought it would be pii�datit "to spend those additional funds on
additional rock rather than on additional borinizs.
Councilmember Woodruff asked if there is a
reclamation projects in the CIP based on the N
cost estimates could be adjusted to be more cons
Drive were typical of what has "been found with
begin to be discussed in Aprita this can be disc
to adjust the "cbst,,estirnates for other roadway
dive experience. Director Brown stated the other
e,`but W did not think the findings under Nelsine
projects. Administrator Heck stated the CIP will
at that time.
Councilmember Woodr6 Mated during previous meetingsresidents had made comments about drainage
concerns regarding all three roadways - �He asked if there would be any significant drainage concerns that
will not be addressed as part ohthe two projeetsz -.
Engineer r,ah ini explained the go' ah-is'to try and mitigate the drainage problem that flows across Nelsine
Drive as tXuch as possible , N' 'sine DriVe -does not currently have a crown to corral the water to the south.
A cloven 1 be installed as_jpart of the:xeclamation effort to try and corral some of the water. Catch
basins will be'installed in the grass boulevard to try and capture some of the storm water. The proposal is
to channel the eider in the pipe dander the roadway, down the proposed easement between the O'Neills'
property and the Svobodas' property to about fifty feet before the edge of the wetland, then it will
discharge from the eirexgy drssrpater and travel across the property to the wetland. The flow through the
tall grasses should remove „ se diment and phosphorus before reaching the wetland.
Landini explained on Wild Rose Lane, the Mason property located on the corner gets inundated with
storm water from every direction. A crown is proposed for Wild Rose Lane. The storm sewer will be
extended to pick up a culvert that goes underneath Wild Rose Lane. The ditches will be filled in along
Meadowview Road, and a pipe will be installed to convey the storm water and that will eventually
discharge to a wetland north of Valleywood Lane. During the plan review meeting Mr. Mason and Mr.
Opfer offered up the drainage and utility easement between their two properties where there is a second
culvert. He did not include that in the original plans because lie thought it was outside of the scope of the
original project. Therefore, it is included in the plans as a bid alternate. Council can decide whether or not
to include the drainage Swale when the project is awarded. He hoped to have easement documents and
CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
March 8, 2010
Page 6 of 9
Councilmember Woodruff asked if there is a catch basin on the Meadowview Road / Sunnyvale Lane
corner. Engineer Landini explained there are four catch basins being added in various spots near that
corner so that corner should be covered very well.
Mayor Lizee asked when Sunnyvale Lane and Valleywood Lane are scheduled to be improved. The
response was the CIP indicates Valleywood Lane is scheduled for 2012 and Sunnyvale Lane for 2013.
Don Koch 25835 Wild Rose Lane stated storm water flows across his propertyto the Masons' property
and the Opfers' property. He explained a culvert was installed years ago in the area because the roadway
washed out. He expressed concern about the drainage.
Mark Headla 25645 Wild Rose Lane stated it sounded to hiui as if the` reconstruction project was going
to be done. He asked what the assessment payment terms for th project would be. He thought it would be
included on his property taxes. Administrator Heck explained the roadway reclamation project including
storm water and storm sewer improvements would not be assessed; they are funded out of the City's
general fund. The only thing that would be assessed wvould be the extension.of watermain. The total cost
for the assessment /connection charge would be =$10,000Couneil has not yet decided whether or not to
extend watermain as part of the Meadowview Road and _gild Rose Lane reconstruction project, nor what
the assessment terms would be watermain wereto, be eXtended:'Council had discussed the possibility of
amending the City's water inance,in February 2010 but chose not to change the water policy at that
time.
Mr. Headla asked when property owners would have to hook up to city water if it were extended. Mayor
Lizee stated the City does not` foiee, property owners.to hook up to city water, but the properties will be
assessed.
x nt
In respor& to a comment frt m Mr. Opfer, Mayor Lizee stated property owners could continue to use
their vve11 for the entire time they own theirproperty.
Mr. Headla said _the people who owned his property previously installed copper pipe from the house to the
street but there '19 no ,curb stop He asked if he would be charged to locate that pipe should he elect to
hook up to city water 1Vlayor L�B�6e explained that it is his responsibility as a property owner to ensure the
pipe is working correctly
Mr. Healda asked how property owners would be assessed. Director Burton explained property owners
would see the assessment on their property tax statement. The City Council would notify the property
owners and then the property owners would have a chance to address the Council about the assessment.
Any assessment would be certified to Hennepin County. Hennepin County would then place the
assessment on the owners' property tax statement for payment twice a year over the designated period.
Mr. Headla asked if there is any guarantee in an increase in property value if a property were to connect
to city water to which Director Burton responded there is none.
CITY OF SH R WOOD REGULAR COUNCIL, MEETING MINUTES
Larch 8, 2010
Page 7 of 9
Mr. O'Neill asked if a property owner has to certify a property owners` pipe that runs from their house to
the street. Director Brown explained it would be to the homeowners' advantage to conduct a pressure test
which is not a costly procedure, noting the City prefers that be done.
Mayor Lizee asked how many of the properties front Meadowview Road and how many abut
Meadowview Road that could potentially be assessed. Engineer Landini explained there were two
properties with a Meadowview Road address, one with a Wild Rose Lane address, two with a Valleywood
Lane address, and two with a Sunnyvale Lane address that are considered abutting Meadowview Road.
Those properties would be assessed if watermain were extended. He noted there are two properties on
Wild Rose Lane that have already been assessed for watermain as part of the Eureka Road watermain
extension. Lizee stated one of the properties on Valleywood Lane and, two on Sunnyvale Lane do not
front Meadowview Road or Wild Rose Lane. She expressed she did think those three properties
should be assessed because they do not front Meadowview Road or, Wild Rose Lane, and the logical entry
for city water would be on the front of those three properties. If those property, 'Owners prefer to hook up
to city water via the side of their property then that could be considered. Landini stated that although he
agreed with Lizee's logical statement the City's Ordinance. states the two Sunnyvale Lane properties and
the two Valleywood Lane would have to be assessed' because they are abuttin : the streets under
consideration. He thought it would be more logical , for, those four properties to have the water come
from watermain under Sunnyvale Lane or Valleywood Line. He explained if watermain were to be
extended down those two roadways water stubs could be installed for those four properties.
Councilmember Woodruff asked Engineer Lan
potentially be assessed for watermain extensi+
project are in support of watermain extensio
property were in support of the extension of
financial reasons.
Woodruff moved, Zerby` seconded, Adopting
Improvement, Approv n" Plans, Speeificatio
Bids City Project 10 -01, 10 02. Nelsme Drive 1
Reconstruction Projects including Saiin #,a y
Watermain Exletision.?7,
to summarize how many of the properties that could
Is part of the Meadowview Road / Wild Rose Lane
�andixii explained that originally the owners of one
tetmaiir;: but they have since changed their mind for
KSOLUTION NO. 10 -008 "A Resolution Ordering
and ;Estimates and Authorizing Advertisement for
lama #ion and Meadow View Road, Wild Rose Lane
Ner `and Storm Water improvements but without
Councih mber Zerby expressed his cgnc about the number of trees that will be lost due to the
widening ref. Meadowview R" oatl and Wild Rose Lane. He stated lie would like the tree loss to be
minimized xf et possible. He, asked Staff to be as judicious as possible when it comes to removing
trees.
Councihnember Woodruff asld if at a later date Council could consider directing Staff to have trees
planted. He asked Staff,i come back with a recommendation on that. Director Brown stated Ile thought it
prudent for the City to'Miere to its own tree preservation policy and identify the significant trees that
should, at a minimum, be replaced.
Motion passed 311 with Lizee dissenting.
Mayor Lizee stated that she thought that anytime a roadway is reconstructed watermain should be
extended as part of that project if it is not already there because of the cost to install watermain as a
standalone project at a future date. She expressed her disappointment that the Meadowview Road / Wild
Rose Lane reconstruction project will not include the extension of watermain.
CCTV OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
March ti, 201
Page 8 of 9
10. GENERAL/NEW BUSINESS
A. Authorizing Submittal of a Grant Application and Improvement for Automatic
Door Openers
Zerby moved, Bailey seconded, RESOLUTION N# 1 009 m• it on Author zing
Grant Application for Automatic Door Openers." Motion pass6&410-
B. Deer Management
This item was moved to a March 22, 2010, City Council'regular meeting agenda.
C. Award Contract for Badger Tennis Courts
This item was removed from the consent agenda at Councilmember Bailey's request.
Councihnember Bailey stated in 2009 the Cit)
Park resurfaced. At the time resurfacing was
clearly documented prior to them being resurfa
efforts after a freeze /thaw season I dt,two. He
located in Badger Park, buf he would like
held up. s
terpis courts located in Manor Park and Cathcart
1 11e °suggested the conditions of the surfaces be
der to be able to evaluate the value of contractor's
Ile is not opposed to resurfacing the tennis courts
assess how the resurfacing of the other courts has
Director Brown stated he
up. He indicated he will:;
Woodfliff moved, Bailey seconded, d
meeting. Motion passed 4/0.
11. STAFF' - OP COUNCIL REPORTS
A. Administrator and Staff
to evaluate how the 2009 resurfacing has held
stand behind the existing bid amount until that
this item to the May 10, 2010, City Council Regular
Administrator Heck stated the Minnehaha Creek Watershed (MCWD) District Technical Advisory
Committee is holding a meeting on March 16, 2010, at 2:30 P.M. at the Southshore Community Center.
There should be revised rule documents available for discussion. The Mayor of Mound is hosting a
meeting on March 17, 2010, for all Lake Minnetonka area elected officials and administrators to discuss
the amendments to the two MCWD rules.
Heck then stated he has preliminary Southshore Community Center (SSCC) operating numbers available
for January — February, 2010, and his plan is to share them with Council shortly. Preliminary numbers
indicate revenues exceed expenditures slightly. He explained Kristi Anderson, who is responsible for SSC
A. Update on Ron Johnson Litigation
Mayor Liz6e began the Executive Session at 8:11 P.M.
Mayor Liz6e, Councilmembers Bailey, Woodruff and Zerby, Attor
were present. The purpose of the meeting was for confidential att(
pending litigation with Ron Johnson. The litigation iii olves one
regarding a condemnation matter relating to his proper ty3ui ! City
Mr. Johnson is currently pursuing these ongoing issues in Male and k
Mayor Liz6e adjourned the executive session at 8:26 P.M.
Mayor Liz6e reconvened the regular meeting at 8_ : 26.P.M.
13. ADJOURN
Bailey moved, Zerby second" d, Adjourning the City Council
8:27 P.M. Motion passed `4 /0.
Tietjen'and,Administrator Heck
�- client discussion regarding the
issues raised by Mr. Johnson
>horewood from the early 1990s.
Court.
Meeting of March 8, 2010, at
Christine Liz6e, Mayor
RESPECTFULLY SUBMLT�TED
Christine Freeman, Recorded
UO" UNCIL ACTION FORM
Department Council Meeting Item Number
Finance March 22,2010 3A
Item Description: Verified Claims
From: Michelle Nguyen
Bonnie Burton
Brian Heck X
Claims for council authorization. The attached claims list includes checks numbered 49731 through
49797 & EDA check numbered 1214 totaling $214,665.82.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of the claims list.
3/_2/2010 "IM
VEND ._,F.'T lj I CLt -) Ot sI"o—viOOa
-CANT:. .. DEACON :0ANK
DATE s/09/2010 STHRU
z/P '—TT2T(LRY CHECK' ..EPOPT
AMOUNT DISCOUNT
I; i( :;
CHECK
CHECK CHECK
CHECK
NAME
STATUS
DATE
EFTPS — FEDERAL W/H
D
3/16/2010
MN DEPT OF REVENUE
D
3/16/2010
U.S. BANK — CORPORATE TRUST —
R
3/22/2010
ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST- 302131 -4
R
3/16/2010
MINN NCPERS GROUP LIFE INS
R
3/16/2010
PERA
R
3/16/2010
WELLS FARGO HEALTH BENEFIT SVC
R
3/16/2010
ADAM'S PEST CONTROL, INC
R
3/22/2010
ADVANCED IMAGING SOLUTIONS INC
R
3/22/2010
AFSCME CO 5 MEMBERS HEALTH FUN
R
3/22/2010
ALLDATA
R
3/22/2010
ANDERSON, KRISTI B.
R
3/22/2010
BIFFS, INC.
R
3/22/2010
CARQUEST AUTO PARTS
R
3/22/2010
CENTERPOINT ENERGY
R
3/22/2010
COMMUNITY REC RESOURCES
R
3/22/2010
COSTCO MEMBERSHIP
R
3/22/2010
CULLIGAN BOTTLED WATER
R
3/22/2010
DELEGARD TOOL CO
R
3/22/2010
DREW KRIESEL
R
3/22/2010
ELK RIVER FORD
R
3/22/2010
GAME TIME
R
3/22/2010
AMOUNT DISCOUNT
I; i( :;
CHECK
CHECK CHECK
NO
STATUS AMOUNT
000000
12,685.35
000000
2,197.47
001214
5,250.00
0497
1,420.81
049744
32.00
049745
6,675.42
049747
1.,199.13
049748
68.10
049749
160.65
049750
408.00
049751
1.,500.00
049752
120.29
049753
869.50
049754
223.19
049755
2,499.04
049756
2,280.00
049757
90.00
049758
31.99
049759
184.29
049760
819.00
049761
28,229.94
049762
1,354.49
3/18/2010
_._. - P 14 Ali- Hi_STORY CHECK REPORT
VF,NDOR ..,
Shorec
BANK:
DA 'E :E�'NGE
3 /0, /20;0 FRU 99/99/' :991
CHECK
VENDOR I.D.
NAME;
STATUS
DATE
09395
GOPHER SIGN COMPANY
R
3/22/2010
27195
GRAINGER, INC
R
3/22/2010
06795
HARMON AUTO GLASS - HOPKINS
R
3/22/2010
07900
HAWKINS, INC.
R
3/22/2010
10506
HENN CTY INFO TECHNOLOGY DEPT
R
3/22/2010
13070
LANDINI, JAMES
R
3/22/2010
12900
LK MTKA CONSERVATION DIST
R
3/22/2010
21340
LOCAL LINK
R
3/22/2010
1
MAACO COLLISION REPAIR &AUTO
R
3/22/2010
15176
MENARDS
R
3/22/2010
15500
METRO COUNCIL ENVMT(WASTEWATER
R
3/22/2010
29319
METRO ECSU
R
3/22/2010
16480
MINNESOTA AWWA
R
3/22/2010
17144
MN POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY
R
3/22/2010
1
MORSETH, MARY
R
3/22/2010
15000
PAETEC
R
3/22/2010
26100
QWEST
R
3/22/2010
22347
RUMPCA CO INC
R
3/22/2010
22950
SHOREWOOD TRUE VALUE
R
3/22/2010
23500
SO LK MTKA POLICE DEPT
R
3/22/2010
29312
STUDER, TONY
R
3/22/2010
29101
SUN NEWSPAPERS
R
3/22/2010
AGE.
CHECK ('HECK CHECK.
AMOUNT DISCOUNT NO ,S'SATUS AMOUNT
049763 325.26
049764 176.67
049765 170.02
049766 70.00
049767 64.00
049768 89.07
049769 7,756.50
049770 131.80
049771 2,205.79
049772 24.32
049773 47,027.65
049774 25.00
049775 350.00
049776 23.00
049777 146.00
049778 527.31.
049779 783.73
049780 48.00
049781 199.29
049783 225.00
049784 240.00
049785 75.08
3/18/2010 .q¢ Pint /P HISTORY C FCL. REPOR`i' TA( E: _
�.rENDOR SE" 0 1 City c, .Sho cvloo'i
BANE: I REACO_. R7N?'
DATE RANGE: 3/09/2010 "HR.0 -)9/�)9 /99,9
CHECK
CHECK
CHECK CHECK
VENDOR
I.D.
NAME
STATUS DATE
AMOUNT
DISCOUNT
NO
STATUS AMOUNT
17200
SUN PATRIOT NEWSPAPERS
R 3/22/2010
049786
39.69
23726
TKDA ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS PLAN
R 3/22/2010
049787
23,713.42
25452
TWIN CITY WATER CLINIC
R 3/22/2010
049788
100.00
25848
U.S. BANK - CORPORATE TRUST -
R 3/22/2010
049789
318.38
29154
UNIQUE PAVING MATERIALS
CORP.
R. 3/22/2010
049790
1,055.39
83900
WASTE MANAGEMENT -TC WEST
R 3/22/2010
049791
437.32
27590
WESTSIDE WHOLESALE TIRE
R 3/22/2010
049792
20.22
28451
WSB AND ASSOCIATES
R 3/22/2010
049793
3,794.10
19800
XCEL ENERGY
R 3/22/2010
049794
213.12
13302
LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES IN
R 3/22/2010
049795
801.00
15885
MIDWEST MAILING SYSTEMS
INC
R 3/22/2010
049796
500.00
1
CAROUSEL AUDI
V 3/22/2010
049797
206.47
1
VOID CHECK
1
VOID CHECK
M -CHECK
VOID CHECK
V 3/22/2010
049797
206.47CR
1
ROB MARTIN
R 3/22/2010
049798
206.47
* * T 0 T A L S
* *
NO
CHECK AMOUNT
DISCOUNTS
TOTAL APPLIED
REGULAR CHECKS:
54
145,298.44
0.00
145,298.44
HAND CHECKS:
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
DRAFTS:
2
14,882.82
0.00
14,882.82
EFT:
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
NON CHECKS:
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
VOID DEBITS VOID
DISCOUNTS
VOID CREDITS
VOID CHECKS:
1
206.47
0.00
206.47CR
TOTAL
ERRORS: 0
VENDOR SET: 01
BANK: 1 TOTAL
57
160,181.26
0.00
160,181.26
BANK: 1 TOTALS:
57
160,181.26
0.00
160,181.26
REPORT TOTALS:
59
160,181.26
0.00
160,181.26
03 -.ri -2010 1_:43 PM
C O U N
C _ ._ REPORT J�� VEND -
MAR _, "1,010
= - F: -E .
"lL?, ^i =OR. SORT KEY
RAT
SCR1 ION
L'Liv Ta
PAt ENT ._..
MOUid"
ADAM'S NEST CON'T'ROL,, INC
3/22/10
1SIT QTR SVC
General Fund
Munic1pa) Bui dsngs
68.10
TOTALt
68.10
ADVANCED IMAGING SOLUTIONS INC
3/22/10
SVC 02/06/10 - 03/06/10
General Fund
Municipal Buildings
160 .65_
TOTAL:
160.65
AFSCME CO 5 MEMBERS HEALTH FUND
3/22/10
APR UNION DENTAL PREM
General Fund
Unallocated Expenses
408.
TOTAL:
408.00
ALLDATA
3/22/10
AUTO /TRUCK TECH_ SVC REPAIR
General Fund
Public Works
1,500.00
TOTAL:
1,500.00
ANDERSON, KRISTI B.
3/22/10
SSCC -SOUND SISTER & GIRL 9
Southshore Communi
Senior Community Conte
120.29
TOTAL:
120.29
BIFFS, INC.
3/22/10
MAR RENTAL
General Fund
Parks & Recreation
869.50
TOTAL:
869.50
CARQUEST AUTO PARTS
3/22/10
LAMP BACK
General Fund
Public Works
7.38
3/22/10
V BELTS
General Fund
Public Works
67.62
3/22/10
FILTERS
General Fund
Public Works
96.67
3/22/10
FILTERS
General Fund
Public Works
51.52
TOTAL:
223.19
CENTERPOINT ENERGY
3/22/10
GAS 01/18 -02/18
General Fund
Municipal Buildings
354.74
3/22/10
GAS 01/18 -02/18
General Fund
Public Works
1,347.86
3/22/10
GAS 01/18 -02/18
General Fund
Parks & Recreation
430.65
3/22/10
GAS 01/18 -02/18
Water Utility
Water
171.04
3/22/10
GAS 01/18 -02/18
Water Utility
Water
194.7
TOTAL:
2,499.04
COMMUNITY REC RESOURCES
3/22/10
PARK SVC 03/1 -03/12
General Fund
Parks & Recreation
1,980.00
3/22/10
SSCC ASSISTANT - 03/1 -03/1
Southshore Communi
Senior Community Cents
300.00
TOTAL:
2,280.00
COSTCO MEMBERSHIP
3/22/10
FINANCE MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL
General Fund
Finance
45.00
3/22/10
PLANNING MEMBERSHIP RENEWA
General Fund
Planning
45.00
TOTAL:
90.00
CULLIGAN BOTTLED WATER
3/22/10
DRINKING WATER SVC
General Fund
Municipal Buildings
31.99
TOTAL:
31.99
DELEGARD TOOL CO
3/22/10
NEEDLE SCALER TOOL
Water Utility
Water
159.91
3/22/10
NEEDLE PARTS
Water Utility
Water
24.38
TOTAL:
184.29
DREW KRIESEL
3/22/10
SSCC - FEB RENTAL
Southshore Communi
Senior Community Cente
287.00
3/22/10
SSCC- FEB CLEANING SVC
Southshore Communi
Senior Community Cents
532.00
TOTAL:
819.00
EFTPS - FEDERAL W/H
3/16/10
FEDERAL W/H
General Fund
NON- DEPARTMENTAL
4,673.93
3/16/10
FICA W/H
General Fund
NON- DEPARTMENTAL
3,246.44
3/16/10
MEDICARE W/H
General Fund
NON- DEPARTMENTAL
759.27
3/16/10
FICA W/H
General Fund
Council
80.60
3/16/10
MEDICARE W/H
General Fund
Council
18.87
3/16/10
FICA W/H
General Fund
Administration
283.71
'.3- _ri - <0 ').. P!'f`
r.0 U i�7
C L J., ht.pO�:i �' 3� i -NL „-
.r �.R ?.2 " %� -0
PAG, F;:
2
V ENDOR SORT KEY
DT' lE
E SORI -'I'T O'N
FDND ....
E T �1_Rt M LD.' "'
...... A',4CTR7'T
3/
MEDICARE W/H
General fund
Admi n fi sr rat on
66.36-
3/16/_
FICA W/H
General Fund
General Government
343.89
3/16/10
MEDICARE W/H
General Fund
General Government
80.42
3/16/10
FICA W/H
General Fund
Elections
4.48
3/16/10
MEDICARE W/H
General Fund
Elections
1.04
3/16/10
FICA W/H
General Fund
Finance
335.72
3/16/10
MEDICARE W/H
General Fund
Finance
78.52
3/16/10
FICA W/H
General Fund
Planning
281.43
3/16/10
MEDICARE W/H
General Fund
Planning
65.81
3/16/10
FICA W/H
General Fund
Protective Inspections
197.98
3/16/10
MEDICARE W/H
General Fund
Protective Inspections
46.30
3/16/10
FICA W/H
General Fund
City Engineer
184.58
3/16/10
MEDICARE W/H
General Fund
City Engineer
43.16
3/16/10
FICA W/H
General Fund
Public Works
438.49
3/16/10
MEDICARE W/H
General Fund
Public Works
102.57
3/16/10
FICA W/H
General Fund
Streets & Roadways
321.12
3/16/10
MEDICARE W/H
General Fund
Streets & Roadways
75.10
3/16/10
FICA W/H
General Fund
Tree Maintenance
55.54
3/16/10
MEDICARE W/H
General Fund
Tree Maintenance
12.99
3/16/10
FICA W/H
General Fund
Parks & Recreation
326.46
3/16/10
MEDICARE W/H
General Fund
Parks & Recreation
76.35
3/16/10
FICA W/H
Southshore Communi
Senior Community Cente
69.48
3/16/10
MEDICARE W/H
Southshore Communi
Senior Community Cente
16.25
3/16/10
FICA W/H
Water Utility
Water
141.00
3/16/10
MEDICARE W/H
Water Utility
Water
32.98
3/16/10
FICA W/H
Sanitary Sewer Uti
Sewer
53.97
3/16/10
MEDICARE W/H
Sanitary Sewer Uti
Sewer
12.61
3/16/10
FICA W/H
Recycling Utility
Recycling
14.69
3/16/10
MEDICARE W/H
Recycling Utility
Recycling
3.44
3/16/10
FICA W/H
Stormwater Managem
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT
113.30
3/16/10
MEDICARE W/H
Stormwater Managem
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT
26.50
TOTAL:
12,685.35
GAME TIME
3/22/10
SLIDE FOR SILVERWOOD PARK
Park Capital Impro
Park Capital Improveme
1
TOTAL:
1,354.49
GOPHER SIGN COMPANY
3/22/10
TENNIS CORT RULES SIGNS
General Fund
Public Works _
325.26
TOTAL:
325.26
GRAINGER, INC
3/22/10
WATER TREATMENT PLANT
Water Utility
Water
176.67
TOTAL:
176.67
HARMON AUTO GLASS - HOPKINS
3/22/10
REPLAC HOPPER WINDOW SWEPP
General Fund
Public Works
170.02
TOTAL:
170.02
HAWKINS, INC.
3/22/10
CHLORINE
Water Utility
Water _
70.00
TOTAL:
70.00
HENN CTY INFO TECHNOLOGY DEPT
3/22/10
FEB 80OMHZ RADIO
General Fund
Public Works
64.00
TOTAL:
64.00
ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST - 302131 -457
3/16/10
P/R DEDUCTS - DEFERRED COM
General Fund
NON- DEPARTMENTAL
1,075.00
3/16/10
P/R DEDUCTS - DEFERRED COM
General Fund
NON- DEPARTMENTAL
345.81
TOTAL:
1,420.81
LANDINI, JAMES
3/22/10
MAR WELLNESS
General Fund
City Engineer
40.0000
)3 '_?i -2010 01 4.3 pM
J
-. " ?: REPORT By VENDOR -
EAR 22, 2010
VENDOR SORT KEY
D- 1 I2
DES CR, i !"I" ON
F0.11D
DEPAR MEN T
t MOUNT
3/22/10
GPs
General :Fund
City Engineer
x_6.07
3/22/10
MILEAGE
General Fund
City Engineer
3. 00
TOTAL:
89.07
LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES INS TRUST
3/22/10
WORK COMP AUDIT FRED
General Fund
Municipal Buildings _
801.00
TOTAL:
801.00
LK MTKA CONSERVATION DIST
3/22/10
1ST SIR LEVY
General Fund
Council
7,756.50
TOTAL:
7,756.50
LOCAL LINK
3/22/10
APR WEBLINK SVC
General Fund
Municipal Buildings
_ 131.80
TOTAL:
131.80
MENARDS
3/22/10
LUMBER
General Fund
Public Works
12.26
3/22/10
LUMBER
General Fund
Public Works
_ 12.06
TOTAL:
24.32
METRO COUNCIL ENVMT(WASTEWATER)
3/22/10
APR WASTEWATER SVC
Sanitary Sewer Uti
Sewer
47,027.65
TOTAL:
47,027.65
METRO ECSU
3/22/10
COOPERATIVE PURCHASING -PAR
General Fund
Parks & Recreation
25.00
TOTAL:
25.00
MIDWEST MAILING SYSTEMS INC
3/22/10
APR NEWSLETTER POSTAGE
General Fund
General Government
500.00
TOTAL:
500.00
MINNESOTA AWWA
3/22/10
WA SYS- BACKES B. & BROWN
Water Utility
Water
_ 350.00
TOTAL:
350.00
MISC. VENDOR ELK RIVER FORD
3/22/10
ELK RIVER FORD: F350 PICKU
Equipment Replacem
Equipment Replacement
28,229.94
MAACO COLLISION REPAIR
3/22/10
MAACO COLLISION REPAIR &AUT
Equipment Replacem
Equipment Replacement
2,205.79
MORSETH, MARY
3/22/10
EVENT 02/21/10 CANCELED
Southshore Communi
Senior Community Cente
146.00
ROB MARTIN
3/22/10
POTHOLE DAMGE VEHICLE REF
General Fund
Streets & Roadways
206.47
TOTAL:
30,788.20
MN DEPT OF REVENUE
3/16/10
STATE W/H
General Fund
NON - DEPARTMENTAL
2,197.47
TOTAL:
2,197.47
MINN NCPERS GROUP LIFE INS
3/16/10
MONTHLY- ELECT LIFE INS
General Fund
NON- DEPARTMENTAL _
32.00
TOTAL:
32.00
MN POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY
3/22/10
WASTE WA LIC - BRUCE STARK
Sanitary Sewer Uti
Sewer _
23.00
TOTAL:
23.00
PAETEC
3/22/10
SVC 01/26 -02/25
General Fund
Municipal Buildings
135.86
3/22/10
SVC 01/26 -02/25
General Fund
Public Works
46.90
3/22/10
SVC 01/26 -02/25
General Fund
Parks & Recreation
145.60
3/22/10
SVC 01/26 -02/25
Water Utility
Water
98.70
3/22/10
SVC 01/26 -02/25
Water Utility
Water
100.25
TOTAL:
527.31
PERA
3/16/10
P/R DEDUCTS -PERA
General Fund
NON- DEPARTMENTAL
3,080.97
3/16/10
P/R DEDUCTS -PERA
General Fund
Administration
328.59
3/16/10
P/R DEDUCTS -PERA
General Fund
General Government
384.91
3/16/10
P/R DEDUCTS -PERA
General Fund
Elections
5.10
3/16/10
P/R DEDUCTS -PERA
General Fund
Finance
379.38
01 1E -2010 01. 49 pin,
n ,; N
C I REPOR BV VENDOR ..
MAR 22, 2 010
PAGE:
-.
J i3N.JO2 SORT KEY
DA`PE
ii -,S <:R 1; TSGiv
I'Ub7D
DE=' "'M E U7T
?MOUii1T
3/16/10
P/R DEDUCTS -PERA
General Fund
Planning
357.90
3/16/10
P/R DEDUCTS -PERA
General Fund
Protective Inspections
257.52
3/16/10
P/R DEDUCTS -PERA
General Fund
City Engineer
209.09
3/16/10
P/R DEDUCTS -PERA
General Fund
Public Works
512.60
3/16/10
P/R DEDUCTS -PERA
General Fund
Streets & Roadways
365.85
3/16/10
P/R DEDUCTS -PERA
General Fund
Tree Maintenance
72.40
3/16/10
P/R DEDUCTS -PERA
General Fund
Parks & Recreation
269.21
3/16/10
P/R DEDUCTS -PERA
Southshore Communi
Senior Community Cents
78.45
3/16/10
a/R DEDUCTS -PERA
Water Utility
Water
164.97
3/16/10
P/R DEDUCTS -PERA
Sanitary Sewer Uti
Sewer
62.54
3/16/10
P/R DEDUCTS -PERA
Recycling Utility
Recycling
16.59
3/16/10
P/R DEDUCTS -PERA
Stormwater Managem
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT
129.35_
TOTAL:
6,675.42
QWEST
3/22/10
FEB 25 -MAR 24
General Fund
Municipal Buildings
111.91
3/22/10
MAR SVC
Water Utility
Water
315.23
3/22/10
MAR SVC
Water Utility
Water
236.43
3/22/10
FEB 25 -MAR 24
Water Utility
Water
60.08
3/22/10
FEB 25 -MAR 24
Water Utility
Water
60.08
TOTAL:
783.73
RUMPCA CO INC
3/22/10
BRUSH
General Fund
Tree Maintenance
48.00
TOTAL:
48.00
SHOREWOOD TRUE VALUE
3/22/10
HARDWARE
General Fund
Public Works
3..31
3/22/10
HARDWARE
General Fund
Public Works
52.13
3/22/10
C. BENDER
General Fund
Public Works
30.97
3/22/10
PARTS
General Fund
Public Works
30.67
3/22/10
PARTS
General Fund
Public Works
19.22
3/22/10
FUEL OIL SPRAYER
General Fund
Streets & Roadways
53.41
3/22/10
CREDIT
Water Utility
Water
3.20-
3/22/10
CONDUIT SE WELL
Water Utility
Water
12. 78
TOTAL:
199.29
SO LK MTKA POLICE DEPT
3/22/10
JUL HENN CTY PROCESSING FE
General Fund
Police Protection
225.00
TOTAL:
225.00
STUDER, TONY
3/22/10
SSCC - FEB SNOW SHOVELING
Southshore Communi
Senior Community Cents
_ -. 240 .00
TOTAL:
240.00
SUN NEWSPAPERS
3/22/10
SWPPP 03/04
General Fund
General Government
32.18
3/22/10
ORD NO. 464 -03/04
General Fund
General Government
42. 90
TOTAL:
75.08
SUN PATRIOT NEWSPAPERS
3/22/10
ORD NO. 464 - 03/06
General Fund
General Government
39. 69
TOTAL:
39.69
TKDA ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS PLANNERS
3/22/10
FEB NELSINE & MEADOWVIEW
Street Capital Imp
Street Capt Improvemen
23
TOTAL:
23,713.42
TWIN CITY WATER CLINIC
3/22/10
AUG BACTERIA ANALYSIS
Water Utility
Water
1.00.
TOTAL:
100.00
U.S. BANK - CORPORATE TRUST - TFM
3/22/10
EDA- PUBLIC SAFETY FIRE 200
2007 EDA Ref Debt
EDA Ref Debt Service
1,750,00
3/22/10
EDA - PUBLIC SAFETY POLICE20
2007 EDA Ref Debt
EDA Ref Debt Service
1,750.00
3/22/10
EDA - PUBLIC SAF'EIY NIKE 200
2007 EDA Ref Debt
EDA Ref Debt Service
1,750.00
C) ii N
C -_ L REPORT nO VENLO: -
MFR 22, 2010
I -'. vE:
7- ;NDC)Tt SORT 'E` -'
'SATE
r�;S C_t.. PITON
FLDI7;
O :PAR i iFr7•r
i_tr,ULN
3/2.2/10
-996A WATER BONDS FISCAL F
WaCer Uti_l,.ty
Water
3i8
iH
TOTAL:
UNIQUE', PAVING MATERIALS CORP.
3/22/10
COLD MIX PATCHING
General Fund
Streets D Roadways
1,055.39
'DOTAL:
1,055.39
WASTE MANAGEMENT -TC F7ES7'
3/22/10
MAR SVC
General Fund
Public Works
299.60
3/22/10
SSCC -MAR SVC
Southshore Communi
Senior Community Cents _
137.72
TOTAL:
437.32
WELLS FARGO HEALTH BENEFIT SVCS
3/16/10
P/R DEDUCTS -HSA
General Fund
NON- DEPARTMENTAL
1,103.13
3/16/10
P/R DEDUCTS -HSA
General Fund
General Government
96.00
TOTAL:
1,199.13
WESTSIDE WHOLESALE TIRE
3/22/10
TIRE PART
General Fund
Public Works
_ 20.22
TOTAL:
20.22
WSB AND ASSOCIATES
3/22/10
JAN GIS HELP
General Fund
City Engineer
52.50
3/22/10
JAN WATERSHED DISTRICT COM
General Fund
City Engineer
401.00
3/22/10
JAN SMITHTOWN LN REHAB
Street Capital Imp
Street Capt Improvemen
1,584.00
3/22/10
JAN HARDING LN /AVE REHAB
Street Capital Imp
Street Capt Improvemen
1,756.60
TOTAL:
3,794.10
XCEL ENERGY
3/22/10
5700 CTY RD 19
General Fund
Traffic Control /Str Li
37.81
3/22/10
5700 CTY RD 19 UNIT LIGHTS
General Fund
Traffic Control /Str Li
175.31
TOTAL:
213.12
—PAYROLL EXPENSES
3/15/2010 - 99/99/9999
General Fund
Council
1,300.00
General Fund
Administration
4,694.22
General Fund
General Government
5,559.39
General Fund
Elections
72.76
General Fund
Finance
5,419.70
General Fund
Planning
5,112.73
General Fund
Protective Inspections
3,678.98
General Fund
City Engineer
2,986.99
General Fund
Public Works
7,322.72
General Fund
Streets & Roadways
5,226.56
General Fund
Tree Maintenance
1,034.37
General Fund
Parks & Recreation
5,620.26
Southshore Communi
Senior Community Cente
1,120.80
Water Utility
Water
2,356.69
Sanitary Sewer Uti
Sewer
893.42
Recycling Utility
Recycling
236.93
Stormwater Managem
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT
1,848.04
TOTAL:
54,484.56
j13 18 2010 0 1 :4 ? E (2 0 U N C -1 L -REPORT H" VT MAR 22, "2.07..0
VENDOR SORT KEY KATE DESCRIPTION - DEPARTMENT_ AMOUN'T
FUND) TOTALS -------
101 General Fund 91,920.4-4
307 2007 EDA Ref Debt Service 5,250.00
402 Park Capital improvements 1,354.49
403 Equipment Replacement 30,435.73
404 Street Capital Improvemen 27,054.02
490 Southshore Community Ctr. 3,047.99
601 Water Utility 5,141.12
611 Sanitary Sewer Utility 48,073.19
621 Recycling Utility 271.65
631 Stormwater ManagementUtil 2,117.19
GRAND TOTAL: 214,665.82
------------------------
TOTAL PAGES: 6
f+3 -7..8 -2010 0..43 PM
)EPA Z i MENT
NON - DEPARTMENTAL,
Council
Administration
C U J t7 nEFO 'T R/ i) - ,PAR MENT
MAR 22, 2J:_0
P:)GE
_1
3/16/10
FUND VENDOR JAMS
DATE
DESCR 1 1 P"i'_I ONT
'1,'3GliN`i
1ST QTR LEVY
Gene Fund EFTPS ... FEDERAL W/H
3/16/ =..0
FEDERAL WILT
4,673.93
1,300.00
3/16/10
FICA WIN
3,246.44
3/16/10
3/16/10
MEDICARE W/H
759.27
3/16/10
PERA
3/16/10
P/R DEDUCTS -PERA
3,080.97
P/R DEDUCTS -PERA
ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST - 302131 -457
3/16/10
P/R DEDUCTS - DEFERRED COM
1,075.00
4,694.22
3/16/10
P/R DEDUCTS- DEFERRED CON
345.81
MN DEPT OF REVENUE
3/16/10
STATE W/H
2,197.47
3/16/10
MINN NCPERS GROUP LIFE INS
3/16/10
MONTHLY - ELECT LIFE INS
32.00
P/R DEDUCTS -PERA
WELLS FARGO HEALTH BENEFIT SVCS
3/16/10
P/R DEDUCTS -HSA
1,103.13
500.00
3/22/10
TOTAL:
16,514.02
General Fund EFTPS - FEDERAL W/H
LK MTKA CONSERVATION DIST
* *PAYROLL EXPENSES
General Fund
General Government General Fund
Elections
Finance
Planning
General Fund
General Fund
General Fund
EFTPS - FEDERAL W/H
PERA
* *PAYROLL EXPENSES
EFTPS - FEDERAL W/H
PERA
MIDWEST MAILING SYSTEMS INC
SUN PATRIOT NEWSPAPERS
WELLS FARGO HEALTH BENEFIT SVCS
SUN NEWSPAPERS
* *PAYROLL EXPENSES
EFTPS - FEDERAL W/H
PERA
* *PAYROLL EXPENSES
EFTPS - FEDERAL W/H
PERA
COSTCO MEMBERSHIP
* *PAYROLL EXPENSES
EFTPS - FEDERAL W/H
PERA
COSTCO MEMBERSHIP
3/16/10
FICA W/H
80.60
3/16/10
MEDICARE W/H
18.87
3/22/10
1ST QTR LEVY
7,756.50
3/15/2010 - 99/99/9999
1,300.00
TOTAL:
9,155.97
3/16/10
FICA W/H
283.71
3/16/10
MEDICARE W/H
66.36
3/16/10
P/R DEDUCTS -PERA
328.59
3/15/2010 - 99/99/9999
4,694.22
TOTAL:
5,372.88
3/16/10
FICA W/H
343.89
3/16/10
MEDICARE W/H
80.42
3/16/10
P/R DEDUCTS -PERA
384.91
3/22/10
APR NEWSLETTER POSTAGE
500.00
3/22/10
ORD NO. 464 - 03/06
39.69
3/16/10
P/R DEDUCTS -HSA
96.00
3/22/10
SWPPP 03/04
32.18
3/22/10
ORD NO. 464 -03/04
42.90
3/15/2010 - 99/99/9999
5,559.39
TOTAL:
7,079.38
3/16/10
FICA W/H
4.48
3/16/10
MEDICARE W/H
1.04
3/16/10
P/R DEDUCTS -PERA
5.10
3/15/2010 - 99/99/9999
72.76
TOTAL:
83.38
3/16/10
FICA W/H
335.72
3/16/10
MEDICARE W/H
78.52
3/16/10
P/R DEDUCTS -PERA
379.38
3/22/10
FINANCE MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL
45.00
3/15/2010 - 99/99/9999
5,41.9.70
TOTAL:
6,258.32
3/16/10
FICA W/H
281.43
3/16/10
MEDICARE W/H
65.81
3/16/10
P/R DEDUCTS -PERA
357.90
3/22/10
PLANNING MEMBERSHIP RENEWA
45.00
O, 1.i -20.0 Cl:q I'M
C C ',7 7,, C I 7,_ REDORi" BY DEPAPTM7NT - MAR
22, 2010
- ?AGE
2
DEP . 2 FUND
VENDOR NPIME,
DA-7
D R PT ION
P;MC;JOi'
-PAYROLL EXPENSES
3/1 - 99/99/9999
5,112.73
TOTAL:
5,862.87
Municipal Dui - ldings General. Fund
ADAM'S PEST CONTROL, INC
3/22/10
1ST QTR SVC
68.10
CULLIGAN BOTTLED WATER
3/22/10
DRINKING WATER SVC
31.99
ADVANCED IMAGING SOLUTIONS INC
3/22/10
SVC 02/06/10- 03/06/10
160.65
LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES INS TRUST
3/22/10
WORK COMP AUDIT PREM
801.00
PAETEC
3/22/10
SVC 01/26 -02/25
135.86
CENTERPOINT ENERGY
3/22/10
GAS 01/18 -02/18
354.74
LOCAL LINK
3/22/10
APR WEBLINK SVC
131.80
QWEST
3/22/10
FEB 25 -MAR 24
111.91
TOTAL:
1,796.05
Police Protection General Fund
SO LK MTKA POLICE DEPT
3/22/10
JUL HENN CTY PROCESSING FE
225.0
TOTAL:
225.00
Protective Inspections General Fund
EFTPS - FEDERAL W/H
3/16/10
FICA W/H
197.98
3/16/10
MEDICARE W/H
46.30
PERA
3/16/10
P/R DEDUCTS -PERA
257.52
-PAYROLL EXPENSES
3/15/2010 - 99/99/9999
3,678.98
TOTAL:
4,180.78
City Engineer General Fund
EFTPS - FEDERAL W/H
3/16/10
FICA W/H
184.58
3/16/10
MEDICARE W/H
43.16
PERA
3/16/10
P/R DEDUCTS -PERA
209.09
LANDINI, JAMES
3/22/10
MAR WELLNESS
40.00
3/22/10
GPS
46.07
3/22/10
MILEAGE
3.00
WSB AND ASSOCIATES
3/22/10
JAN GIS HELP
52.50
3/22/10
JAN WATERSHED DISTRICT COM
401.00
-PAYROLL EXPENSES
3/15/2010 - 99/99/9999
2,986.99
TOTAL:
3,966.39
Public Works General Fund
EFTPS - FEDERAL W/H
3/16/10
FICA W/H
438.49
3/16/10
MEDICARE W/H
102.57
PERA
3/16/10
P/R DEDUCTS -PERA
512.60
ALLDATA
3/22/10
AUTO /TRUCK TECH SVC REPAIR
1,500.00
CARQUEST AUTO PARTS
3/22/10
LAMP BACK
7.38
3/22/10
V BELTS
67.62
3/22/10
FILTERS
96.67
3/22/10
FILTERS
51.52
HARMON AUTO GLASS - HOPKINS
3/22/10
REPLAC HOPPER WINDOW SWEPP
170.02
GOPHER SIGN COMPANY
3/22/10
TENNIS CORT RULES SIGNS
325.26
HENN CTY INFO TECHNOLOGY DEPT
3/22/10
FEB 800MHZ RADIO
64.00
PAETEC
3/22/10
SVC 01/26 -02/25
46.90
MENARDS
3/22/10
LUMBER
12,26
3/22/10
LUMBER
12.06
CENTERPOINT ENERGY
3/22/10
GAS 01/18 -02/18
1,347.86
SHOREWOOD TRUE VALUE
3/22/10
HARDWARE
3.31
3/22/10
HARDWARE
52.13
3/22/10
C. BENDER
30.97
3/22/10
PARTS
30,67
3/22/10
PARTS
19.22
WESTSIDE WHOLESALE TIRE
3/22/10
TIRE PART
20.22
WASTE MANAGEMENT -TC WEST
3/22/10
MAR SVC
299 .60
0 8 2 0 10 •') 1 3 ,A
C 0 U N C I E P 0 R f D v )E P Y TR T ME N`.' MAR
22, 2010
?A-
3
D F', 1 A" Z 7 1 M -,,'! q -
FUND VETTD(',j NAME
D7-TE
1) TP] S CTR T 71 T TON
AMOUN'!
"PAY EXPENSES
311 99/99/9999
7, 322
.72__
TOTAL:
12,
Streets & Roadways
General Fund EFTPS - FEDERAL W/H
3/16/10
FICA W/H
321.12
3/16/10
MEDICARE W/H
75.10
PERA
3/16/10
P/R DEDUCTS -PERA
365.85
MISC. VENDOR ROD MARTIN
3/22/10
POTHOLE DANGE VEHICLE REP
206.47
SHOREWOOD TRUE VALUE
3/22/10
FUEL OIL SPRAYER
53.41
UNIQUE PAVING MATERIALS CORP.
3/22/10
COLD MIX PATCHING
1,055.39
—PAYROLL EXPENSES
3/15/2010 - 99/99/9999
5,226.56
TOTAL:
7,303.90
Traffic Control/Str Li
General Fund XCEL ENERGY
3/22/10
5700 CTY RD 19
37.81
3/22/10
5700 CTY RD 19 UNIT LIGHTS
175.31
TOTAL:
213.12
Tree Maintenance
General Fund EFTPS - FEDERAL W/H
3/16/10
FICA W/H
55.54
3/16/10
MEDICARE W/H
12.99
PERA
3/16/10
P/R DEDUCTS-PERA
72.40
RUMPCA CO INC
3/22/10
BRUSH
48.00
PAYROLL EXPENSES
3/15/2010 - 99/99/9999
1,034.37
TOTAL:
1,223.30
Parks & Recreation
General Fund EFTPS - FEDERAL W/H
3/16/10
FICA W/H
326.46
3/16/10
MEDICARE W/H
76.35
PERA
3/16/10
P/R DEDUCTS-PERA
269.21
BIFFS, INC.
3/22/10
MAR RENTAL
869.50
COMMUNITY REG RESOURCES
3/22/10
PARK SVC 03/1-03/12
1,980.00
PAETEC
3/22/10
SVC 01/26-02/25
145.60
CENTERPOINT ENERGY
3/22/10
GAS 01/18-02/18
430.65
METRO ECSU
3/22/10
COOPERATIVE PURCHASING-PAR
25.00
PAYROLL EXPENSES
3/15/2010 - 99/99/9999
5,620.26
TOTAL:
9,743.03
Unallocated Expenses
General Fund AFSCME CO 5 MEMBERS HEALTH FUND
3/22/10
APR UNION DENTAL PREM
408.00
TOTAL:
408.00
EDA Ref Debt Service
2007 EDA Ref Debt U.S. BANK - CORPORATE TRUST - TFM
3/22/10
EDA-PUBLIC SAFETY FIRE 200
1,750.00
3/22/10
EDA-PUBLIC SAFETY POLICE20
1,750.00
3/22/10
EDA-PUBLIC SAFETY FIRE 200
1,750.00
TOTAL:
5,250.00
Park Capital Improveme
Park Capital Impro GAME TIME
3/22/10
SLIDE FOR SILVERWOOD PARK
1,354.49
TOTAL:
1,354.49
Equipment Replacement
Equipment Replacem MISC. VENDOR ELK RIVER FORD
3/22/10
ELK RIVER FORD: F350 PICKU
28,229.94
MAACO COLLISION REPAIR
3/22/10
MAACO COLLISION REPAIR&AUT
2,205.79
TOTAL:
30,435.73
Street Capt Improvemen
Street Capital Imp TKDA ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS PLANNERS
3/22/10
FEB NELSINE & MEADOWVIEW
23,713.42
WSB AND ASSOCIATES
3/22/10
JAN SMITHTOWN LN REHAB
1,584.00
3/22/10
JAN HARDING LN/AVE REHAB
1,756.60__
TOTAL:
27,054.02
Senior Community Cents
Southshore Communi EFTPS - FEDERAL W/H
3/16/10
FICA W/H
69.48
3/16/10
MEDICARE W/H
16.2,
0310 01 43 PM
C J N C T L REPORT B" DEPAR M2 °N`I` -
MAR 22, 2010
DEPT- 2 MPNT
FUND VENDOR NI-`ME
D "1S
DESC. t 7 1 "F I ON
AMOUNT
PERA
3f 16/10
.P /R DEDUCTS PERA
'78.45
ANDERSON, KRISTI B.
3/22/10
SSCC -SOUND SISTER & GIRL 9
_20.29
COMMUNITY REC RESOURCES
3/22/10
SSCC ASSIST -ANT - 03/1 -03/7.
300.00
MISC. VENDOR MORSETH, : "VARY
3/22/10
EVENT 02/21/10 CANCELED
146.00
DREW KRIESEL
3/22/10
SSCC - FEB RENTAL
287.00
3/22/10
SSCC- FEB CLEANING SVC
532.00
STUDER, TONY
3/22/10
SSCC - FEB SNOW SHOVELING
240.00
WASTE MANAGEMENT -TC WEST
3/22/10
SSCC -MAR SVC
137.72
* *PAYROLL EXPENSES
3/15/2010 - 99/99/9999
1,120.80
TOTAL:
3,047.99
Water
Water Utility EFTPS - FEDERAL W/H
3/16/10
FICA W/H
141.00
3/16/10
MEDICARE W/H
32.98
PERA
3/16/10
P/R DEDUCTS -PERA
164.97
DELEGARD TOOL CO
3/22/10
NEEDLE SCALER TOOL
159.91
3/22/10
NEEDLE PARTS
24.38
HAWKINS, INC.
3/22/10
CHLORINE
70.00
PAETEC
3/22/10
SVC 01/26 -02/25
98.70
3/22/10
SVC 01/26 -02/25
100.25
MINNESOTA AWWA
3/22/10
WA SYS- BACKES B. & BROWN
350.00
CENTERPOINT ENERGY
3/22/10
GAS 01/18 -02/18
171.04
3/22/10
GAS 01/18 -02/18
194.75
SHOREWOOD TRUE VALUE
3/22/10
CREDIT
3.20-
3/22/10
CONDUIT SE WELL
12.78
TWIN CITY WATER CLINIC
3/22/10
AUG BACTERIA ANALYSIS
100.00
U.S. BANK - CORPORATE TRUST - TFM
3/22/10
1996A WATER BONDS- FISCAL F
318.38
QWEST
3/22/10
MAR SVC
315.23
3/22/10
MAR SVC
236.43
3/22/10
FEB 25 -MAR 24
60.08
3/22/10
FEB 25 -MAR 24
60.08
GRAINGER, INC
3/22/10
WATER TREATMENT PLANT
176.67
* *PAYROLL EXPENSES
3/15/2010 - 99/99/9999
2,356.69
TOTAL:
5,141.12
Sewer
Sanitary Sewer Uti EFTPS - FEDERAL W/H
3/16/10
FICA W/H
53.97
3/16/10
MEDICARE W/H
12.61
PERA
3/16/10
P/R DEDUCTS -PERA
62.54
METRO COUNCIL ENVMT(WASTEWATER)
3/22/10
APR WASTEWATER SVC
47,027.65
MN POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY
3/22/10
WASTE WA LIC - BRUCE STARK
23.00
* *PAYROLL EXPENSES
3/15/2010 - 99/99/9999
893.42
TOTAL:
48,073.19
Recycling
Recycling Utility EFTPS - FEDERAL W/H
3/16/10
FICA W/H
14.69
3/16/10
MEDICARE W/H
3.44
PERA
3/16/10
P/R DEDUCTS -PERA
16.59
* *PAYROLL EXPENSES
3/15/2010 - 99/99/9999
236.93
TOTAL:
271.65
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT
Stormwater Managem EFTPS - FEDERAL W/H
3/16/10
FICA W/H
113.30
3/16/10
MEDICARE W/H
26.50
PERA
3/16/10
P/R DEDUCTS -PERA
129.35
03 18 2010 01-43 PM 0 j N T?EPOI?T 3V DE RM EN— 01
PAT MTR 22, 20
r - ,
nAME ;-:
�^IIAYROLL EXPENSES
GRAND TOTAL: 214,665.82
--------------------------------
E�CRIPT-for I I MOUn7-
3/15/2010 99/99/9999 1 ,848-04
TOTAL: 2,117.19
TOTAL PAGES: 5
FUND TOTALS _______________°
101
General Fund
91,920-44
307
2007 EDA Ref Debt Service
5,250.00
402
Park Capital improvements
1,354.49
403
Equipment Replacement
30,435.73
404
Street Capital Improvemen
27,054.02
490
Southshore Community C=.
3,047.99
601
Water Utility
5,141.12
611
Sanitary Sewer Utility
48,073.19
621
Recycling Utility
271.65
631
Stormwater ManagementUtil
2,117.19
GRAND TOTAL: 214,665.82
--------------------------------
E�CRIPT-for I I MOUn7-
3/15/2010 99/99/9999 1 ,848-04
TOTAL: 2,117.19
TOTAL PAGES: 5
� ���lK A ���� ����
I L L , I �� /[»�� .� N . �|n� ��� � RM
Action
The City began negotiations with the Union utthe end of2OO9ooa new two year agreement. The
negotiations wrapped up in early February with a tentative agreement between the parties. Staff met with
the Union one last time inearly March io ensure all understood the changes in the agreement.
The Union voted on March 9, 2010 and approved the agreement. The agreement is now before the
Council for similar action.
The general terms and conditions employment remain generally the sarne. The agreement as presented
and approved by the Union provides a wage freeze for 2010 and a 2% adjustment ill 2011. The
contribution toward benefits increases to $825 per month from $777 in 2010 and increases to $850 in
2011. As part of this program, an employee who chooses to select the lower cost Health Savings Plan
option retains the savings up to the $2,500 single deductable. The City retains any savings over that
amount.
Sick and other leaves were changed to language found in the Policy Manual for consistency with the non-
union staff.
Options
l. Approve the agreement as
%. Reject the agreement and acud book for further on;
Recommendation
Staff rccoonnondo the Council approve the agreement aa presented.
Council Action:
AGREEMEN]"
CITY OF SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA
Ems
LOCAL 224, COUNC I L 5
OF THE
AMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE
COUNTY AND MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEE S
AFL-CIO
JAN UARY 1, 2111 0 — DECE ER 31, 2 011
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Article 1
Purpose and Intent
4
Article 2
Recognition
4
Article 3
Definitions
4
Article 4
Union Security
5
Article 5
Employer Security
5
Article 6
Employer Authority
6
Article 7
Non - discrimination
6
Article 8
Grievance Procedure
6
Article 9
Seniority
8
Article 10
Probationary Period
9
Article 11
Job Posting
9
Article 12
Lay-off and Recall
10
Article 13
Work Schedules
10
Article 14
Savings Clause
10
Article 15
Discipline
10
Article 16
Right of Subcontract
11
Article 17
Sick Leave
11
Article 18
Severance Pay
12
Article 19
Funeral Leave
13
Article 20
Insurance
13
Article 21
Vacation
14
Article 22
Holidays
15
Page 12
Article 23
Leaves
16
Article 24
Uniforms
16
Article 25
Overtime Pay
16
Article 26
Premium Pay
17
Article 27
Call Backs
17
Article 28
Waiver
18
Article 29
Duration and Effective Date
19
Appendix A
Wage Schedule
20
Seniority Roster
21
Page 13
This Agreement is entered into by and between the City of Shorewood, Minnesota, a municipal
corporation, hereinafter referred to as the EMPLOYER, and Local 224, Council 5 of the
American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, AFL -CIO, hereinafter referred
to as the UNION.
It is the purpose of this Agreement to establish certain wages, hours, and conditions of
employment, and to establish procedures for the resolution of disputes concerning the
interpretation or application of the Agreement. The Employer and the Union continue their
dedication to the highest quality of public service. Both parties recognize this Agreement as a
pledge of this dedication.
< 1111 LE 2 - -- 1 '.( f�� ) f`ttf:
The Employer recognizes the Union as the exclusive representative under Minnesota Statutes,
179A.03, Subdivision 8, as may be amended from time to time, for all employees of the Public
Works department of the City of Shorewood whose service exceeds the lesser of fourteen (14)
hours a week or thirty -five percent (35 %) of the normal work week and more than sixty -seven
(67) days a year, excluding supervisory and confidential employees.
Section 1: UNION: Local 224, Council 5 of the American Federation of State, County and
Municipal Employees (AFSCME), AFL -CIO.
Section 2: EMPLOYER: the City of Shorewood.
Section 3: UNION MEMBER: a member of Local 224, Council 5 of the American Federation
of State, County and Municipal Employees (AFSCME), AFL -CIO.
Section 4: EMPLOYEE: a member of the exclusively recognized bargaining unit.
Section 5: BASE PAY RATE: the employee's hourly pay rate exclusive of longevity or any
other special allowance.
Section 6: SENIORITY: length of continuous service in any of the job classifications covered
by Article 2 of this agreement.
■..- 0
�'"z R C ..< k .,.' 4 -,-- UN 'f ( "N
Section 1: In recognition of the Union as the certified exclusive representative, the Employer
shall deduct from the wages of employees who authorize in writing such a deduction, an amount
sufficient to provide payment of dues established by the Union. Such monies shall be remitted
to the appropriate designated Officer of the Union.
Section 2: The Union may designate one employee from the bargaining unit to act as
Steward and shall inform the Employer in writing of such choice.
Section 3: The Employer shall, on request of the Union, grant reasonable time off as
required by law, an unpaid leave of absence to Union Members who are elected or appointed
officials of the Union.
Section 4: The Union agrees to indemnify and hold the Employer harmless against any and
all claims, suits, orders, or judgments brought or issued against the Employer or as a result of
any action taken or not taken by the Employer under the provisions of this Article. Further the
Union and the Employer recognize and agree that the limitations of the Employer's liability also
apply should the Union exercise the application of "fair share" as provided by M.S. 179A.06,
Subdivision 3, as may be amended from time to time.
The Union and its members agree that during the life of this Agreement, they will not cause,
encourage, participate in, or support any strike, slowdown, or other interruption of, or
interference with, the normal functions of the Employer. Violations of this Article shall be
grounds for disciplinary action up to and including discharge.
Page 15
Section 1: The Employer retains the full and unrestricted right to operate and manage l
manpower, facilities, and equipment; to establish functions and programs; to set and amend
budgets; technology; a,.
inherent structure; to select, direct and determine the number of personnel; to establish work schedules;
and to perform any ,. a .e specifically '# by this Agreement.
Section 2: Any terms and conditions of employment not specifically established or modified
by this Agreement shall remain solely within the discretion of the Employer to modify, establish,
or eliminate.
The parties agree that their respective policies will not discriminate against any employee
covered by this Agreement because of gender, creed, color, age, national origin, handicap,
sexual preference, political or religious beliefs, association or affiliation or non - association or
non - affiliation with a labor organization, nor will either party to this Agreement discriminate on
the aforementioned basis in the application or interpretation of the provisions of this Agreement.
Section 1. Processinq of a Grievance: It is recognized and accepted by the Union and the
Employer that the processing of grievances as hereinafter provided is limited by the job duties
and responsibilities of the Employees and shall therefore be accomplished during normal
working hours only when consistent with such Employee duties and responsibilities. The
aggrieved Employee and the Union Representative shall be allowed a reasonable amount of
time without loss in pay when a grievance is investigated and presented to the Employer during
normal working hours provided the Employee and the Union Representative have notified and
received approval of the designated supervisor who has determined that such absence is
reasonable and would not be detrimental to the work program of the Employer.
Section 2. Procedure: Grievances, as defined in Article 3, Section 7, shall be resolved in
conformance with the following procedure:
Step 1. An Employee or Employees claiming a grievance shall meet on an informal basis
with the employee's immediate supervisor as designated by the Employer in an attempt to
resolve the grievance within fifteen (15) business days after the grievance has occurred.
The Employer- designated representative will discuss and give an answer to the Step 1
grievance within ten (10) business days after receipt. If the grievance is not resolved, it may
be reduced to writing by the exclusive representative and served upon the Employer -
designated Step 2 representative. Service must be made within ten (10) business days
after the Employer- designated representative's final answer in Step 1. Any grievance not
-..-
appealed in writing to Step by the Union within ten (10) business days shall be considered
Step 2. If appealed, the written grievance shall be presented by the Union and discussed
with the Employer-designated Step 2 representative. The Employer-designated
representative shall give the Union the Employer's Step 2 answer in writing within ten (10)
business days after receipt of such Step 2 grievance. If a resolution of the grievance
results, the terms Of that resolution shall be written ODD[ attached tothe grievance and shall
be signed by the Employer and the Union. If MD agreement is reached, the eXdU8im8
representative may proceed with the grievance by appealing to Step 3 within ten (10)
business days following the Employer-designated representative's final Step 2answer. The
appeal Sh8U indicate the intention of the Union to proceed with the grievance, 8 statement Of
the Ahev8OQe the provision(s) of the AoneennBOt in diaput8, and the relief requested. Any
grievance not appealed in writing to Step 3 by the Union within ten (10) business days Sh8||
be considered waived.
Step 3. If appealed, the written grievance Sh8|| be presented by the Union and discussed
with the Employer-designated Step 3 Representative for mediation. The Employer-
designated representative Sh8|| give the Union the Employer's 8DGvve[ in writing within ten
(10) bUSiDeSS days after receipt Of such Step 3 Q[i8v8DCe. If 3 neSO|UtiOn of the grievance
[esU|tG. the resolution Sh@|| be reduced tOwriting as provide in Step 2. Ag[i8V8OC8 not
[eSO|Ved in Step 3 may be appealed to Step Or directly tO Step 5 within ten (10) business
days fO||OVviOg the Employer-designated representative's final 8OSvve[ in Step 8. Any
grievance ODL appealed in writing to Step for mediation Or directly tO Step 5fO[ arbitration
by the Union within ten (1O) business days shall be considered waived.
Step 4. AgrievanCa unresolved in Step 3 and not appealed directly to Step 5 but appealed
in Step 4 for DlediGtiOn. shall be submitted within in—the designated time limit to the
Minnesota BUFe8U Of Mediation G8rViCeS with notice provided t0 the Employer. If o
PBSO|udOn of the grievance FeGU|tG the PeSO|UtiOD shall be reduced to writing as provided in
Step 2. A grievance not resolved in Step 4 through the mediation process, may be
advanced to Step 5 by the Union within in ten /10\ business days fO||OVViOg final mediation.
Any grievance not appealed in writing t0 Step 5 within ten (10) bUSiOBSS days shall be
considered waived.
Step 5. A grievance unresolved in Step 3 or Step 4 and appealed in Step 5 may be
submitted to arbitration. The Employer and the Union Sh@|| endeavor to select @ DlUtU@||y
acceptable arbitrator to h83[ and decide the g[i8V3DC8. If the Employer and the Union are
UOab|8 to agree OD an 8[bit[8tO[, they may request from the Director of the BU[B8U of
Mediation Services, State of K8iOO8S0t8. 3 |iSi of five (5) D8nlea. The parties 8h@|| alternate
strike names from the list Of five (5) arbitrators until only one (1) D80e [e0@iDG. The
remaining arbitrator shall be requested to hear and decide the grievance. The determination
of which party will commence the striking process shall be made by a flip of a coin.
Section 4. Arbitrators Authority:
C. The fees and expenses for the arbitrator's services and proceedings shall be borne
equally by the Union and the Employer provided that each party shall be responsible for
compensating its own representatives and witnesses. If either part desires a verbatim
record of the proceedings, it may cause such a record to be made, providing it pays for
the record. If both parties desire a verbatim record of the proceedings, the cost shall be
shared equally.
Section 1 : Seniority is defined by the Agreement in Article 3, Section 3. Any former employee of
the Employer who has terminated may be rehired only under the conditions of a new employee
and no credit will be given for prior service.
Section 2: An employee in the Union who is promoted or transfers temporarily to another City
department shall have the option to return to his former position without loss of seniority.
Section 3: Seniority shall be calculated as total continuous length of service with the Employer
for other benefits under this Agreement.
Section 4. The Employer will maintain and up -to -date seniority roster. An up -to -date copy of
the seniority roster will be posted at least once each year and a copy will be provided to the
Union. The names of all regular full -time and any part -time members of the bargaining unit who
have completed their probationary periods shall be listed on the seniority roster in the order of
their seniority and shall show the date from which seniority commences and the employee' s job
title. Regular part -time employee's seniority shall be pro -rated on their hours of work as a
percentage of a forty (40) hour workweek.
Section 5. An employee's seniority shall be terminated:
a. If the employee resigns, retires, is transferred outside the bargaining unit or is
discharged; or
b. If when recalled to work following a layoff, the employee fails to report to work in
accordance with Article 12 - LAYOFF and RECALL; or
Section 1: A probationary employee may be terminated at the sole discretion of the Employer
during the probationary period.
Section 2: All newly hired or rehired employees will serve a six (6) month probationary period.
During the probationary period, the newly hired employee shall have no seniority status.
Section 3: for newly hired or rehired employees at the end of the probationary period, the City
Administrator shall recommend for Council consideration one (1) of two (2) actions:
a. Termination of the employee; or
b. Regular employment status.
Section 4: All employees will serve a six (6) month probationary period in any job classification
in which the employee has not served a probationary period.
Section 5: The employee shall be demoted or reassigned at the sole discretion of the Employer
to the position held previously or to a comparable position if, at any time during the probationary
period the performance of a promoted or reassigned employee is unsatisfactory or if the
employee so requests. Such action shall not be subject to the grievance procedure.
ARTIOLE 11 -,1013 K)IS'VING
Section 1: All job openings shall be posted internally for ten (10) calendar days.
Section 2: The Employer and the Union agree that regular job vacancies within the designated
bargaining unit shall be filled based on the concept of promotion from within provided that
applicants:
a. Have the necessary qualifications to meet the standards of the job vacancy; and
b. Have the ability to perform the duties and responsibilities of the job vacancy.
Section 3: The Employer has the right of final decision in the selection of employees to fill
posted jobs based on qualifications, abilities, and experience.
Section 4. Seniority will be the determining criterion for transfers and promotions when
minimum job - relevant qualifications are met.
Page 19
Section : Employees filling a higher job classification based on the provisions of this Article
shall be subject to the conditions of Article 10 — PROBATIONARY PERIOD.
AR- F 1(A ,, x� to
Section 1: The sole authority in work schedules is the Employer. The normal work day for an
employee shall be eight (8) hours. The normal work week shall be forty (40) hours Monday
through Friday.
Section 2 : Service to the public may require the establishment of regular shifts for some
employee's on a daily, weekly, seasonal, or annual basis other than the normal 7:00 a.m. — 3:30
p.m. day. The Employer will give seven (7) days advance notice to the employees affected by
the establishment of work days different from the employee's normal eight (8) hour work day.
Section 3: In the event that work is required because of unusual circumstances such as, but not
limited to, fire, flood, snow, sleet, or breakdown of municipal equipment or facilities, no advance
notice need be given. It is not required that an employee working other than the normal work
day be scheduled to work more than eight (8) hours, however; each employee has an obligation
to work overtime or call backs if requested unless unusual circumstances prevent the employee
from so working.
Section 4: Service to the public may require the establishment of regular work weeks that could
include work on Saturdays and /or Sundays.
This Agreement is subject to the laws of the United States, the State of Minnesota, and the City
of Shorewood. In the event any provision of this Agreement shall be held to be contrary to law
by a court of competent jurisdiction from whose final judgment or decree no appeal has been
taken within the time provided, such provision of this Agreement shall be voided. The voided
provision may be renegotiated at the request of either party. All other provisions shall continue
in full force and effect.
Page 110
Se ction 1: The Employer will discipline employees for just cause only.
Section 2: Discipline, when administered, will be in one of the following forms:
a. Oral reprimand;
b. Written reprimand;
c. Suspension;
d. Demotion; or
e. Discharge.
Section 3: An employee who is reprimanded in writing, suspended, demoted, or discharged,
shall be furnished with a copy of such disciplinary action. A copy of any such disciplinary action
shall • be furnished to the exclusive representative.
Section 4: At the employee's request, the Employer shall remove all references to disciplinary
action in the personnel record in the following manner:
a. Written reprimands after two years with no similar occurrences.
b. References to suspensions and demotions after five years with no similar occurrences.
AR'T1 :`LE 16 -. R t V:tt F Ott' ` Li B CO N'FR M, F
Nothing in this Agreement shall prohibit or restrict the right of the Employer from subcontracting
work performed by employees covered by this Agreement. The employer agrees to provide
notice to the Union and all employees at least ninety (90) business days prior to subcontracting
any work performed by employees covered by this Agreement.
ARTICt,E 1 — SICK LEA VE
Section 1. Rate of Accrual: All full -time employees shall earn sick leave at the rate of one (1)
day (eight [8] hours) per month of employment after the first full calendar month of employment.
If the employment date is the 15th of the month or prior, one full day of sick leave is earned. If
the employment date is the 16th of the month or later, the employee must wait until after the end
of the next calendar month to begin to earn sick leave. Sick leave may be taken during the
probationary period not to exceed the time earned.
Part -time employees working more than 20 hours per week, but less than 40 hours per week
shall earn sick -leave on a pro -rated basis. Sick leave will be granted in not less than one hour
units, which is to mean that if any time less than one (1) hour is used, one (1) hour will be
charged.
Section 2. Maximum Accrual: The maximum sick leave earning limit is 800 hours. At the end of
every year, one -half of the accrued sick leave hours in excess of 800 hours may be converted to
other benefits, such as deferred compensation, added to vacation balance, placed in the next
year's Section 125 Plan account, paid out as cash, or converted to a combination of other
Page 111
benefits). Upon termination, accrued sick leave will be paid as provided in Article 18 of this
Agreement
Section 4. Worker's Compensation: In case of disability caused by sickness or injury and
covered by Worker's Compensation, the City will compensate the employee the difference
between their regular base pay and that received from Workers' Compensation payments, but
never for a longer period than their accumulated sick leave. In such case, the time deducted
from accumulated sick leave shall be in the same amount as the proportion of wages paid by
the City as to the entire base pay of the employee. No sick leave will be paid to employees while
actually working for others.
Section 5. Return to Work — Dr. Note Required: A doctor's certificate may be required for sick
leave absence. Sick leave without pay may be granted at the City Administrator's discretion
after earned sick leave with pay has been exhausted.
Section 6. Use for Family Members: Regular employees may use personal sick leave benefits
provided by the employer for absences due to an illness of the employee's spouse /partner or
child where attendance may be necessary; on the same terms the employee is able to use sick
leave benefits for the employee's own illness. A doctor's certificate may be required for sick
spouse /partner /parent child leave absence. All doctor's certificates required by this section will
be obtained at the employee's expense.
A-1141CLeE 18 -- SFjN1F,'A PAY
Section 1: Regular, full -time employees who leave the municipal service in good standing after
giving at least two (2) weeks' advance notice shall receive severance pay in accordance with
Section 2.
Section 2: Types of termination and qualification for severance.
a. Procedure: regular full -time employees who leave the municipal service voluntarily in good
standing after giving at least two (2) weeks' notice or who receive an Involuntary Elimination
from the City shall be granted severance pay of unused sick time the employee may have
based on the following conditions and rates below.
Page 112
A T ' I .., E; 1 9--- U E' f = f_,1 LEA VIE'
I }'
Section 1: upon notice to the immediate supervisor, all regular full -time employees shall be
granted five (5) paid days of leave for death or funerals in the immediate family. Immediate
family is defined as spouse, children, parents, siblings, grandparents and corresponding in -laws
and corresponding step - relatives.
Section 2: Other types of leave:
a. Upon notice to the immediate supervisor, all regular full -time employees shall be granted
two (2) days of leave for death or funerals of other family members. Other family members
shall be defined as aunts, uncles, nieces, nephews, and cousins.
b. Upon notice to the immediate supervisor, one (1) day of leave shall be granted for death or
funeral of relatives or friends.
c. Leave as granted under Article 19, Section 2, shall be deducted from that employee's
accrued sick leave, vacation, personal leave, compensatory time, or maybe without pay.
`off {sf: <<.'
Section 1: Employer Contribution The Employer shall provide a contribution toward the cost of
health insurance, term life insurance, short term and long term disability, and dental insurance
on behalf of regular full and part -time employees.
Section 2: The insurance carrier shall be selected by the Employer. The employer shall,
following a meet and confer with the Union, determine the type and level of coverage provided
e.g. co -pay plan, Health Savings Account, etc.
Page 113
Section 3: Contribution Amounts
. 2011. The Employer shall provide up to $850 per month to regular full -time employees for
coverage stated in Section 1 above. An employee who elects coverage under the Health
Savings Account that, combined with other benefits, results in a total cost that is less than
the contribution level, shall have the balance applied toward their Health Savings Account
up to a maximum of $2,500 for the year, or $208 per month. Regular part -time employees
working more than 20 hours per week shall be entitled to pro -rated contribution.
Section 4: Deductibility of insurance premiums as pre -tax dollars for employees covered by this
agreement shall be available as permitted by Internal Revenue Service regulations.
Section 5: For regular full -time employees that opt -out of the Employer sponsored health plan,
the Employer shall pay $100 per month. To qualify, the employee must provide proof of
alternative coverage such as through a spouses plan.
Section 6: In accordance with M.S. Statute 471.61, Subdivision 2(b) as may be amended, an
employee who elects to retire early shall be allowed to continue to participate in the Employers
group health insurance plan at the employee's expense.
Section 1. Accrual Regular full -time employees shall accrue paid vacation on the following
basis:
Length of Continuous Service
Accrued Vacation Hours
Start through five 5) years
96 hours (8 hours per month — 12 da s)
Start of six (6) years through nine (9) years
120 hours (10 hours per month— 15 days)
Start of 10 year through 19 yea r
160 hours (13.33 hours per month — 20 days)
Start of 20 year through 2 9th year
200 hours (16.667 hours per month — 25 day)
Start of 30 Year and beyond
240 hours (20 hours per month — 30 days)
Section 2. Length of Continuous Service. Length of continuous service for the purpose of
determining vacations is calculated from the date of full -time employment with the Employer.
Section 3. Probationary Employees. Probationary employees shall accrue paid vacation time,
but shall not be allowed to take vacation leave until after completion of the initial probationary
period.
Section 5. Vacation Salary Advance. Employees may request vacation salary in advance for
"` period • which they be away. A vacation salary advance e a.... be
submitted by the employee to the Employer-designated representative one (1) week in advance
of the vacation period.
Section 6. Payment in Lieu of Vacation. Employees continuing in the Employers employment
shall not be given pay in lieu of vacation. All vacation must be taken prior to the separation of
an employee from employment except in the case of retirement due to disability.
Section 7. Vacation Carry Over. Each employee may carry over to the next year a number of
vacation days based on the following formula: two (2) times the annual rate of accrual on
December 31.
Section 8. Pro -Rata Vacation. Regular part -time employees will receive paid vacation on a pro -
rata basis.
Section 1. Paid Holidays. Regular full -time employees shall be provided with the following
holidays:
Holiday
When observed
New Year's Day
January 1
Martin Luther King Jr. Day
Third Monday in Januar
Presidents Day
Third Monday in February
Memorial Day
Last Monday in Ma
Fourth of July
July 4
Labor Day
First Monday in September
Columbus day
Second Monday in October
Veteran's Day
November 11
Thanksgiving Day
Fourth Thursday in November
Christmas Eve (half day — four hours)
December 24
Christmas Day
December 25
Good Friday (half day — four hours)
Friday before Easter Sunday
Personal Leave Day
As provided in Section 2 of this Article
Section 2. Personal Leave Day. An employee may take the personal leave day with the prior
approval of the Employer- designated representative. An employee shall request the personal
Page 115
3 I E t
Section 1. Child and Parental. The Employer shall grant leave for children's school activities and
parenting leave in accordance with Minnesota Statute 181.940 — 181.943 as may be amended
and, in the case of parenting leave any federal law or regulation.
Section 2. An employee who is temporarily disabled due to pregnancy or childbirth may use sick
leave in accordance with Article 17 — Sick Leave.
Section 1. The Employer shall provide five (5) clean uniforms, consisting of shirts and pants to
each regular full -time employee each week.
Section 2. The Employer will provide for each employee up to $250.00 on an annual basis
toward the purchase of steel -toed safety boots. Payment will be reimbursed to the employee
upon providing to the Director of Public Works a receipt of payment.
Section 3. The Employer will provide for each employee on a biannual basis, insulated
coveralls and hood for minus 20- degree Fahrenheit temperatures. All such work coveralls shall
remain the property of the Employer and not used for personal purposes.
Section 1. Hours worked in excess of eight (8) hours within a twenty -four (24) hour period
(except for shift changes) or more than forty (40) hours within a seven (7) day period will be
compensated for at one and one -half (1.50) times the employee's regular base pay rate.
M .N.
A t
Section 1. When an employee is called in to work a shift on an emergency basis at a time other
than the normal 7:00 a.m. to 3:30 p.m., the Employer agrees to pay said employee a premium
of $6.00 over and above the normal base rate for each hour worked outside the normal work
day, except all hours worked over eight (8) in a day will be paid at the rate of one and one -half
(1.50) times the employee's base rate.
Section 2. Premium pay is not paid in addition to overtime pay. It does not apply to holidays
and observed holidays.
A R1 E 2 I "(:A f .t� B A C t
Section 1. Call -Back: An employee called in for work at a time other than the employee's
normal scheduled shift will be compensated for a minimum of two (2) hours' pay at one and
one -half (1.50) times the employee's base rate of pay.
Section 2. On -Call Compensation: Employees who are scheduled to work Call Backs as
determined by the Employer shall receive an additional eight (8) hours of straight time (or
compensatory time) per on -call status per division (public works services or utility). On -call pay
will be paid at the base pay rate ( "Straight Time "), and may be accumulated as a compensatory
time at that rate at the request of the employee. All employees who are required to be available
for holiday call -backs shall be paid an additional two (2) hours pay per holiday. Employees may
elect to use compensatory time off in lieu of holiday pay in accordance with Article 24 —
Overtime Pay, Section 5.
Page 117
Section 3. To receive compensation described in Section 2, the individual on -call must be
available for an immediate response by telephone and must respond in an appropriate time
period and manner when the situation requires a personal response.
Section 4. Call- Back Procedure:
b. Call -backs outside of sequence. The Director of Public Works, or the supervisor in the
absence of the Director, shall have authority to call out specific individuals, based on
need, where specific expertise or job responsibility is required for the situation. This
procedure is to be utilized sparingly and on an as needed basis.
WAIVILA
Section 1. Any and all prior agreements, resolutions, practices, policies, rules, and regulations
regarding terms and conditions of employment, to the extent inconsistent with the provisions of
this Agreement, are hereby superseded.
Section 2. The parties mutually agree that during the negotiations which resulted in this
Agreement, each had the unlimited right and opportunity to make demands and proposal with
respect to any terms or condition of employment not removed by law from bargaining. All
agreements and understandings arrived at by the parties are set forth in writing in this
Agreement for the stipulated duration of the Agreement. The Employer and the Union each
voluntarily and unqualifiedly waives the right to meet and negotiate regarding any and all terms
and conditions of employment referred to or covered in this Agreement or with respect to any
term or condition of employment not specifically referred to or covered by this Agreement, even
though such terms and conditions may not have been within the knowledge or contemplation of
either or both parties at the time this contract was negotiated or executed.
Page 118
2v'
Christine Lizee
Brian Heck, City Administrator/Clerk
For Local 224, Council 5
American Federation of State, County and
Municipal Employees, AFL-CIO
Carole Gerst, Business Representative
Brad Mason, Negotiating Team Member
Dan Randall, Negotiating Team Member
Page 119
Sectionl . Wages for 2010 shall remain the same as 2009 as shown in the table below.
Shop Tech $21.44 $22.21 $22.98 $23.75 $24.51 $25.29 $26.04
Utility
Operator $21.94 $22.71 $23.48 $24.25 $25.01 $25.79 $26.54
Utility Lead $23.55 $24.42 $25.28 $26.15 $27.01 $27.83 $28.74
'Note: An Additional $.50 per hour for Shop Tech and $1.00 per hour for Utility Operator
is included in table above.
"Note: Employees who are required to obtain and maintain certificates /licenses for their
department (i.e. Water System Class C Operator License and Wastewater System Class C
Operator License) will be compensated at an additional $.50 per hour per
certificate /license.
Section 2 . Wages for 2011 shall increase over the 2010 wages by 2% as shown in the table
below:
2010
Six After
After
After
After
After
one
2
3
4
5
Classification Start Months year
years
Years
Years
Years
LEO $20.94 $21.71 $22.48
$23.25
$24.01
$24.79
$25.54
Shop Tech $21.44 $22.21 $22.98 $23.75 $24.51 $25.29 $26.04
Utility
Operator $21.94 $22.71 $23.48 $24.25 $25.01 $25.79 $26.54
Utility Lead $23.55 $24.42 $25.28 $26.15 $27.01 $27.83 $28.74
'Note: An Additional $.50 per hour for Shop Tech and $1.00 per hour for Utility Operator
is included in table above.
"Note: Employees who are required to obtain and maintain certificates /licenses for their
department (i.e. Water System Class C Operator License and Wastewater System Class C
Operator License) will be compensated at an additional $.50 per hour per
certificate /license.
Section 2 . Wages for 2011 shall increase over the 2010 wages by 2% as shown in the table
below:
Shop Tech $21.87 $22.65 $23.44 $24.23 $25.00 $25.80 $26.56
Utility
Operator $22.38 $23.16 $23.95 $24.74 $25.51 $26.31 $27.07
Utility Lead $24.02 $24.91 $25.79 $26.67 $27.55 $28.39 $29.31
Section 3. At the sole discretion of the Employer, an employee may be temporarily assigned to
the job classification of Utility Lead Worker by the employee's supervisor to perform the full
duties and responsibilities of that classification. The employee shall be paid at a rate of pay that
corresponds to the employee's current step on the Utility Lead pay schedule.
Section 4. Progression. Normally an employee would be hired at Step 1 of the wage table.
After completing probation, (6 months), an employee would go to Step 2 of the wage table.
After completing one (1) year an employee would go to Step 3 of the wage table
After completing two (2) years an employee would go to Step 4 of the wage table
Page 120
2011
Six After
After
After
After
After
one
2
3
4
5
Classification Start Months year
years
Years
Years
Years
LEO $21.36 $22.14 $22.93
$23.72
$24.49
$25.29
$26.05
Shop Tech $21.87 $22.65 $23.44 $24.23 $25.00 $25.80 $26.56
Utility
Operator $22.38 $23.16 $23.95 $24.74 $25.51 $26.31 $27.07
Utility Lead $24.02 $24.91 $25.79 $26.67 $27.55 $28.39 $29.31
Section 3. At the sole discretion of the Employer, an employee may be temporarily assigned to
the job classification of Utility Lead Worker by the employee's supervisor to perform the full
duties and responsibilities of that classification. The employee shall be paid at a rate of pay that
corresponds to the employee's current step on the Utility Lead pay schedule.
Section 4. Progression. Normally an employee would be hired at Step 1 of the wage table.
After completing probation, (6 months), an employee would go to Step 2 of the wage table.
After completing one (1) year an employee would go to Step 3 of the wage table
After completing two (2) years an employee would go to Step 4 of the wage table
Page 120
After completing three (3) years an employee would go to Step 5 of the wage table
After completing four (4) years an employee would go to Step 0 of the wage table
After completing five (5) years an employee would go to Step 7 of the wage table
employees Upon notice to the Union with reasons for doing so, the Employer may hire qualified new
salary schedule on the annual anniversary date of their employment. A Step may be skipped
under recommendation of the Director of Public Works • o
year.
c. The Shop Technician will receive $200.00 per year for holding and maintaining the
Minnesota Department of Transportation Commercial Vehicle Inspection Certificate.
The additional compensation shall be paid_upon verification of licensure and
compensated in the first paycheck after July 1 of the current year.
d. The employees who are covered by this provision of the agreement are responsible to
renew their license on a regular basis, as required by the licensure organization; and
subsequently provide a copy of their paperwork including forms, license, and request
for reimbursement to the Finance Department.
e. An employee, who fails to provide the necessary paperwork and materials to the
Finance Department in order to renew the license, will have their compensation
reduced in accordance with the agreement until the employee obtains valid licensure.
f. If the employee fails to pass the exam and does not qualify for the appropriate work
related license, the employee's compensation will be reduced in accordance with the
Agreement.
Page 121
SEN{]RITY LIST
2010
Job Classification SeniqE��
Utility Lead Worker
07-01-73
Light Equipment Operator
07-15-85
Utility Operator
07-01-87
Shop Technician
06-01-98
Light Equipment Operator
05-19-01
Light Equipment Operator
11-19-01
Light Equipment Operator
10-01-04
Utility Operator
11-02-09
Page 122
COUNCIL ACTION FORM
��
�
Department: Planning Council Meeting: 22 March 2010 item Number: 3C
From: Brad Nielsen, Planning Director
' Inv III
MW
You will recall that Bill Erickson and a number mf his neighbors had purchased a residential lot
that was surrounded by their properties and proposed to split it up among their respective
properties (west end of Smithtown Road\. Mr. Erickson has been working diligently to submit a
final plat before the six-month deadline required by our Subdivision Code. Unfortunately, the
title work that goes into a final plat revealed a two-foot discrepancy between two of the lots
(see attached request) that may take over six months toresolve. Mr. Erickson was advised by
staff to request a six-month extension, and if necessary a second extension prior to expiration
of the first.
Approve the request; approve the request for a shorter or longer deadline; or deny the request.
Staff Recommendation
Since the proposed plat does not create any new lots, and in fact eliminates one, staff recommends the
extension
Council Action:
Brad Nielsen
From: Bill Erickson [bkehokson@mohsicom]
Sent Tuesday, March Og.2O1Q3:4OPIVI
To: COS Planning
Subject: Bill Erickson Addition--Resolution #09-051
Bred—| would like a six month extentiun. The suveyor found a gap problem less than 2 ft between 2794O.27844.and
Worquo|'s property. | am going to have to do a quiet title to get it resolved. It will take at least six monthe,sayo the real
estate attorney. Please set things in motion to get an extension, and I will keep you informed as we go along. The date
onmy approval was onthe September i4th council meeting.
Thank you for your help,
Bill Erickson
ste for the Shorewood city council - March
Respectfully submitted,
Ken Hendrickson
COUNCIL ACTION FORM
��
Department Engineering Council Meeting 3/22/10 |temNumber.�A
Fnom JamesLendini P.E.
Item Dxescriptiow. Public Information Meeting Storm Water Pollution Prevention Program
As part of the Federal Clean Water Act, the City of Shorewood is required to obtain a National
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NP0ES) permit. The two main requirements of this permit are
preparation of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Program (SWPPP) and subsequent annual reports. In
preparation for the annual report, a public meeting must be held to discuss the SWPPP.
In accordance with those requirements, we are holding the public meeting and all public comments
received will be recorded in the Record of Decision, which will be filed with the annual report. During
the public meeting, I will be giving a brief presentation outlining the SWPPP and items that will be
included in the annual report. Attached to this memo are the slides for this presentation.
The deadline for the 2009 annual report ix June 30,201O. The format of the report isnew. Some ofthe
activities that will be reported in the IO89 report include the following:
w 10 water quality-related articles published in the Shnreport
w Ongoing public education and outreach (web site and seminar)
~ Tonight's public meeting
Options
1. Direct staff to create a record of decision and submit the annual report by June 30, 2010.
2. Do nothing.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends that once the City Council has conducted the Public Information Meeting, a motion
be approved directing Staff to prepare a Record of Decision and submit the annual report by June 30,
2010.
Council Action:
City of Shorewood
Annual Meeting
March 22, 2010
Six Minimum Control Measures
The following six minimum control measures
are the implementation mandates under the
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Program:
Post Construction Runoff Control
Illicit Discharge
COUNCIL ACTIONFORM
Department Council Meeting Item dumber
Administration March 22, 2010 10 A
From: Brian Fleck, City Administrator
Item PI °TY SPORTS GRANT
Staff has been working on a grant proposal through the Hennepin county Sports Grant program to cover
part of the cost of the Manor park shelter remodeling / addition currently in the planning and design
stage as provided in the 2010 park capital improvement program. The estimated cost for the structure
at this point is in the area of $70,000. The proposed design eliminates the attached picnic canopy so
staff is recommending installation of a standalone picnic shelter similar to the one being installed at
Silverwood Park. The estimated cost for this structure is approximately $15,000 for a total estimate cost
of $85,000. The budgeted amount for the shelter remodel is $120,000.
While assembling this grant, staff became aware of a grant opportunity to help cover the cost of
installing a handicapped accessible playground structure, called boundless playgrounds. The Manor Park
play ground, which was installed in 1993, is scheduled for upgrade in 2014, and, based on some scoring
criteria in the Hennepin County Grant, including the boundless playground improves the Hennepin
County Grant application as it brings in additional resources via the playground grant. In addition, there
are few if any, handicapped accessible playgrounds in the area.
The grant application is requesting funding for %2 the total project cost — shelter remodel, picnic shelter,
and boundless playground — and the City's share of the project is $112,813 with the grant funding the
other $112,812 of the cost.
The Park Commission is aware of the Hennepin County Grant application for the shelter; however, staff
discovered the Boundless playground grant opportunity recently so the Commission is not aware of this
grant proposal.
Some questions the Council may have regarding this proposal include:
1) Is the City obligated to proceed with the project if the Hennepin County Grant is not awarded?
At this point, the City is committed to remodeling the Manor Park shelter so that project will
move forward regardless of grant award. The boundless playground is an added project and the
City will not be required to complete that project if the grant is not awarded as there is not
grant agreement to execute with the County.
2) Is the city obligated to proceed with the project if a partial amount is awarded? Again, the park
shelter is on schedule for completion in 2010 and will proceed regardless of grant status. The
playground component might be required on a partial award. Staff spoke to the program
manager at Hennepin County and in the two cases in the first round where the entire amount
Council Action:
Options:
1) Adopt the attached resolution authorizing application and execution of grant agreement if grant
is awarded.
2) Request that staff modify the grant and authorize moving forward with the grant agreement.
3) Choose not to apply for the grant agreement and continue with the original project scope e.g.
Manor Park structure.
Recommendation
Staff recommends the Council adopt the attached resolution authorizing the application and authorizing
the Administrator to execute the grant agreement if the grant is awarded.
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
RESOLUTION NO.
WHEREAS, Hennepin County, via its Youth Sports Grant Program, provides for capital funds to
assist local government units of Hennepin County for the development of sport or recreation facilities;
and
WHERE AS, the City of Shorewood desires to design and install a Boundless Playground and Park
Shelter and Multi- Purpose Facility with Restrooms and Drinking Fountain at Manor Park in Shorewood
(hereinafter, PROJECT) for the purpose of benefitting community youth and family sports and recreation.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Shorewood:
I. The estimate of the total cost of design and installation of PROJECT in the amount of $225,625,
with $112,812 being requested from the Hennepin County Legacy Grant program and the City of
Shorewood assuming responsibility for a match requirement of $112,813.
II. City of Shorewood agrees to own, operate, and assume one hundred (100) percent of operation
costs for PROJECT, and will operate PROJECT for its intended purpose for the functional life of the
facility, which is estimated to be 25 years.
III. City of Shorewood agrees to enter into necessary and required agreements with Hennepin
County for the specific purpose of constructing a sport or recreational facility and long term program
direction.
IV. That the City Administrator is authorized and directed to execute said application and serve as
official liaison with Hennepin County or its authorized representative.
ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD this 22 day of March,
2010.
CHRISTINE LIZEE, MAYOR
ATTEST:
BRIAN HECK, CITY ADMINISTRATOR/CLERK
� l
T�T���� �rr°V��`��
� ��
��� |
����� ��� � ���/� � ���_���
Background /Previous Action
Last year the City Council suspended its deer removal program, pending the results of this
year's aerial survey, flown inFebruary. The good news is, vve have no deer on Gales Island!
Otherwise, the count on the mainland is 106 for this year, up from 64 in 2009. The Council
must now decide if it wants to reinstate the removal program, using K48R8, or to leave the
suspension in place. Staff has suggested some numerical thresholds that may be useful in
making this decision (see attached staff report).
Options
Do nothing; continue the suspension of the deer removal program; or reinstate the removal
program, using k4BRB for controlled hunts.
Staff Recommendation
IF (big if) the Council agrees with the numerical goal suggested by staff (or some other
numerical goal), it should direct staff to contact MBRB to arrange a removal program for this
fall. Staff can then develop a formal policy for adoption by the Council.
|
{
| |
�
Council Action:
� !
|
! �
' �
- p # __ 'F,
IFY
,)HOREWOOD
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD E SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 -892 -7 ® (952) 474 -3236
FAX (952) 474 -0128 ° www.d.shorewtood.rTln.us - cityhall@ci.shorc- wood.mn.us
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Brad Nielsen
DATE: 4 March 2010
RE: Deer Management 2010
FILE NO. 405(DMP 2010)
In response to resident complaints that increasing deer populations in Shorewood
were damaging landscaping in the community and in some cases were being hit by
cars, the City initiated a Deer Management Program (DMP) in 2007. The plan began
with an aerial survey conducted by Three Rivers Park District in February of that year.
Since then Shorewood has contracted for aerial surveys each February. The City then
contracted with Metro Bowhunters Resource Base (MBRB), a non - profit organization
of bowhunters to conduct a series of controlled hunts in 2007 and 2008 at select
locations throughout the City. Following are aerial survey counts for each year as
well as the number of deer removed in the controlled hunts:
Year Deer Count Deer Removed
2007 121 26 (11*)
2008 74 23
2009 64 N/A
2010 106 TBD
*In addition to the controlled hunts commissioned by the City, the Miru7etonka
Country Club was authorized to conduct a trap and dispatch program which removed
I I deer.
®%
t 14 PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
'V[eniorandt1rn
Re: Deer Mcranagement Vii(' G 0
t March ' 010
In 2009 the City Council agreed to suspend the controlled hunts and see what if any
effect it might have on the deer population. It is worth a reminder at this time that
while the aerial surveys provide an indication of the deer population, they are only
"snapshots" of a given day. The City uses the surveys, combined with resident
complaints to gauge the relative increase and decrease in deer population.
The 2010 aerial deer survey results are in — the count is 106, up 42 from last year.
The reap on Exhibit A shows the distribution of deer throughout the community. We
received a number of deer complaints in 2009, copies of which are attached for your
review as Exhibit B. Obviously, since the removal program was suspended, we did
not receive any complaints about the program.
One of the criticisms of opponents to the DMP, and a factor in suspending the
controlled hunts, was that there seemed to be no overall goal for the program. Was
121 deer too many deer for a community of this size? Was 64 too few? To try and
answer these questions, staff has researched Minnesota Department of Natural
Resources (DNR) information and the studies conducted by other cities —
Shorewood is not the only city with deer issues! In addition, we have received some
suggestions from Larry Gillette, the Wildlife Manager for Three Rivers Park District.
Some cities have done some very in -depth studies and developed very elaborate
management plans. One of the better ones we have seen was done by the City of
Burnsville. The report is too long to reprint here, but it is available online and we will
forward an electronic copy to you for your review.
IF the City is to continue its management program, a format similar to that used in the
Shorewood Comprehensive Plan is suggested (issues, goals /objectives /policies and
plan).
With respect to issues, these seem to be fairly well defined and for the most part
consist of deer depredation of landscaping and vegetation, and to a lesser degree,
car /deer collisions. In the second case, there does not seem to be a great deal of
evidence of such accidents, however, the DNR and other studies suggest that many of
these incidents may go unreported. These problems should be balanced with the
recreational pleasure that many people get from having the deer around.
The DNR, in its long range plan for the management of white- tailed deer in the Metro
region (1996), sets forth a goal and certain objectives that could be used by the City as
the basis for its management program:
Goal: Manage white - tailed deer populations within the city at socially acceptable
levels that provide recreational and educational opportunities as well as provide
opportunity for maintaining a healthy (natural regeneration) of woodland habitat.
-2-
Mernor< I1du El
Re: Deer Mallageinen', 2,010
4 March 2010
Objectives:
* Determine biological /socially accepted population limits
Reduce car /deer collisions (need more data)
Develop an operational management program to maintain deer populations
within acceptable limits
® Educate residents as to the value of deer and deer habitat; minimizing
nuisance problems through planting and landscaping; and the ramifications
Of supplemental deer feeding
With respect to "acceptable limits ", selecting an "ideal" deer population is inherently
somewhat arbitrary. Three Rivers Parks attempts to keep the population in its parks
to 20 -25 per square mile. Realize that these parks are almost entirely deer habitat.
Larry Gillette suggests that the number of deer found in Shorewood is undoubtedly
too high for a residential community. He goes on to say that a "socially acceptable"
population might be as low as five deer per square mile, which strikes us as being a
bit low. In looking at what other cities have settled on, a number on the order of 15
per square mile appears to be reasonable. Since Shorewood contains approximately
five square miles of land and wetlands (not including lakes), a total population of 75
(the 2008 count) might be appropriate.
Whatever the number that may be agreed upon, IF the City decides to manage that
number, a controlled hunt is the approach recommended by this department. The two
years using MBRB to conduct the hunts were considered safe, efficient and effective.
IF the City determines that the removal program should be reinstated for 2010, staff
suggests that the hunts be limited to the areas of greatest deer concentration: 1) the
Lake Virginia vicinity on the west end of the city; 2) the "Black Lake" /Eureka Road
vicinity; and 3) the areas on both sides of Christmas Lake. We also suggest hunts
similar to the 07 and 08 efforts for this year, after which a scaled down maintenance
effort should be scheduled for 2011. IF the removal program is to be continued, staff
needs to be in touch with MBRB by some time in May — the earlier the better.
Finally, based on the recommendations of the Planning Commission, staff has
published one article in the newsletter relative to supplemental feeding of deer. That
will be followed by a second article next month and a third next fall.
Cc: Brian Heck
Larry Brown
-3-
7�
ff I
RE
Q
�4
o 0
a.
1,800
Fee�
16-
Map prepared by Three Rivers Park District
Department of Natural Resources STH
February 5. 2010
N
W +E
S
4-4
H., MEN
X
Ef
Magm-
31
'KIM
Shorewood and Big Island
January 22 & 29 201
Surveyed by Carol Carter & Brian Fredlund
Tnt.qi npinr (ni infinri - 119
N
M
W,
3
C7
7
W
U, NO V
Exhibit A
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .....
(vo
Zel
Bred Nielsen
1 rom: b i t nie Ise n(g comcast.net
Sent= S@Wrday, October '24, 2009, 10 5% Pl'
To. Brad Nielsen
Subject: Fwd: deer hunt
-bjn-
-- Forwarded Message - - - --
From: "Jean Panchyshyn" < JPanchyshyn @ci.shorewood,mn.us>
To: "Brad Nielsen" <abjnielsen @comcast.net>
Cc: "Brian Heck" <BHecl<@ci.shorewood.mn.us>
Sent: Monday, October 19, 2009 1:59:40 PM GMT -06:00 US /Canada Central
Subject: deer hunt
Don and Lori Mullenbach of Strawberry Lane (474 -4863) stopped into the office today to inquire if the city was going to
do a deer hunt this year, and they would like to be one of the sites for deer removal (counted 7 deer on their property
over the weekend). I told them the city was not doing this program this year, but I would pass their info onto Brad in
case there is a deer hunt next year. They feel that there should be a deer hunt.
Jean Panchyshyn
Deputy Clerk
City of Shorewood
Ph: 952 - 960 -7911
Fax: 952 - 474 -0128
1
From,
Brian Heck
Sent:
Monday, September 21.2OOS8�14AK8
To:
KenneMnDaUmon
Cc:
Brad Nielsen
RE Question Deer
Jackie,
Thank you for the note regarding the deer hunt the City has held in the past COU ' Die of year. The Council madeadecision
last year tuforgo the hunt this year and assess the overall impact on the deer herd via aerial survey in the spring.
Following the results, the Council will decide whether or not to have the hunt inZ010.
I have passed this on to Brad Nielsen as he is the one who wor with the bow hunters in organizing the program.
BRIAN W. HECK '|CM/\-CM
CITY ADMINISTRATOR
CITY oFBHonEvv000
S755 COUNTRY CLUB RD.
SnoREvvOoo,MN5S331
OFFICE: 952-950-7905
MOBILE: 952-463-5836
From: KunnethDaUman [maWo:k.dal|man@mchs.com]
Sent Friday, September 1G,20O97:O7PM
To: Brian Heck
Cc- ]eckie&Ken DaUman
Subject: RE: Question - Deer
Importance: High
Hello Brian,
|
Wondering if the City of Shorewood will be requesting the DNR for a "controlled" shoot of deer this fall.
!
We have quite a large population in our area — we see herds of no less than 6 run thru multiple times daily.
Pretty though they may be, they are quite destructive with residents plants, bushes, and more, not to mention the
traffic hazard.
Your response isappreciated.
Thanks
Jackie Dallman
�� � !
� �
�� °� .
Brad Nielsen
F M: Dick Woodruff [dick wroodrufi @yahoo.conr
S Sunday, June 14, 2009 12 50 PM
T Brad Nielsen
SUbjec;t: RE: RE: Deer Control
B rad,
Critter control should be in your 2010 work ptan and listed in the Mission. Goals, etc. discussions we're havill(T
Please consider ff$ are needed for this in 2010. if possibly yes there should be a tine in some bud�te placed
there by you, to fund the effort. If the S don't fit into the zero levy increase direction, identify the line and the S
as additional staendin-- to be considered by Council.
Thanks,
Dick
- -- On Sun, 6/14/09, Brad Nielsen < BNiel serz (a)ci.shoi e)voo(f.iiifz.ais wrote:
From: Brad Nielsen < BNielseii ),ci
Subject: RE: RE: Deer Control
To: "Dick Woodruff' < dick.woodruf9yahoo.com >
Date: Sunday, Tune 14, 2009, 8:51 AM
Good Morning Dick,
Very interesting paper. It is the first thing I have seen that actually suggest a target reduction (50 %) and maintenance
program. The issue of feeding deer is something that should be further explored. It is too ironic for the City to be
reducing deer popultations while some folks are feeding them.
-bjn-
From: Dick Woodruff [ mailto :dick,woodruff @yalloo,com]
Sent: Sat 6/13/2009 1:55 PM
To: Brad Nielsen; Brian Heck
Subject: Fw: RE: Deer Control
See my other email to Mr. Werner on this topic.
- -- Oil Wed, 6/10/09, Werner, James R y im.rvernerla)hJ).co171 > wrote:
From: Werner, James R < jim.wernerhp.com >
Subject: RE: Deer Control
To: 'Werner, James R" < c11Zee@,ci.Shorewood.mn.LIS < clizee(C cLShorewooCl.liln.us >,
" 57eI 'by�C(ICI.S11oreWO0d,11111.L < slerby U cLShorewood.11111.LIS >, " dW00d1' Ltff(CUCI.Shol'eWOOd.111t1.1tS
< dwoodruff (t7ci.shorewood.nul.us >, " IturOeOr lQ .ShorCWOOd.n111.uS < 111rg
Cc: " iwelrn5l(Fogmail.com " < jwelnl5l�ci' il.conl
Date: Wednesday, June 10, 2009, 9:55 AM
Excellent article, clearly identities the obstacles. A public discussion around an 'informed' paper such as this
WOLItd be helpful.
j1i11
Jit11 Werner Storace A ` IM
Cell 612- 963 -6458
----- Original, Message -----
Fronr: Werner, James R
Sent: Wednesday. June 10, 2009 9:39 AM
To: 'clizee @ci.shorewood.nm.US'; 'szerby @c.i.sllorewood.mn.us'; ' dwoodruf f(c L,ci.sliorewooct.rnn.us',
lttirgeon mci.shorewood.rrin.us'
Cc: 'jwelm5 I a,gmail.corn'
Subject; Deer Control
All,
I'm at wits end, what can I do to manage the nightly deer damage to my yard. I am sensitive to the loss of deer
habitat and the various public /private positions of the people in our community, but this continues to be a
problem. I've tried all the home remedies, while moderately successful, their effectiveness does fade over time
At this point I'm at a loss. I would like to know what the city is doing to address the problem.
1. Harvesting
2. Birth Control Measures
3. Public education
4. Discourage feeding of the wildlife. fines, tickets 5. Effective remedies, Invite experts to present and publish
recommendations that could moderate the issue.
I love the wildlife and the beauty of our city, but we are not doing anyone a
Jim Werner Storage ASM
Cell 612 -963 -6458
M
Brad Nielsen
From: Rl— eaf27 @,aol.con!
Sent: Sunday, April 05, 2009 7:53 PM
To: Christine Lizee, Jeff Bailey, Laura Turgeon, Dick Woodruff; Scott Zerby
Cc: Brad Nielsen
Subject: Deer management progran
I was disappointed to learn of the council's decision to suspend the deer management program for
2009 at the March 9 meeting.
I have resided at 19790 Near Mountain Boulevard for 18 years. We have always had a deer
population in our immediate area. Until 2008, there were typically 2 -4 deer that would regularly be
present on or around our lot. We have tolerated damage to shrubs and lawn, and endured the annual
spring cleanup of waste, recognizing that the deer are a part of our environment. We have found it
impossible to maintain a vegetable garden, and have made changes to our landscaping at
considerable cost to remove plants that have been sources of food, and regularly treat remaining
plants with a repellant.
In spite of the deer harvesting that has occurred during the past two years, the deer population in our
immediate area has increased. This winter, we regularly had 4 -8 deer present on our lot almost every
day. As evidenced by tracks in the snow, and frequent sightings at all hours of the day, these deer
are not confining their roaming to the wooded area and wetland behind our lot, but are frequenting
lots on both sides of Near Mountain Boulevard. I have witnessed on numerous occasions a
procession of deer crossing the street, sometimes at a leisurely pace, and sometimes darting out
after being startled. This should be viewed as a public safety issue. A larger deer population freely
roaming across city streets creates a greater likelihood of a collison involving a car.
I would urge the council to reconsider its decision to suspend the deer management program for
2009, and continue to harvest the deer as has been done in the past. This is a useful service that
has the potential to reduce accidents and costs for residents of the city.
Ron Leaf
Worried about job security? Check out the 5 safest jobs in a recession
�������J����� ACTION ��*~�����
�.& �0����� ��N^ ���. � �� ���� ��������N
The reorganization and reassignment of duties included adding grant writing as duties to a couple of
staff members with the goal being identifying possible grants and other funding sources to help offset
the cost of programs and services provided by the City.
During the first two and a half months, Julie and Twila identified and applied for ten (10) grant
opportunities totaling more than $260,000. To date, they have received $5,500 and only one application
requires matching dollars.
The attachment provides the grants applied for or under consideration, the proposed use of the grant
funds, match required, total amount requested and status of the grant.
The one grant not included on the list is the Secretary of State grant for accessible polling places.
Recommendation
None — for your information
Council Action:
O
-n
0
(D
0
Z
0
0
Co
(D
cu
(D
n
(D
'0
=3
>
to
(D
n 3
rD
(D
M 0
z
to
n
r
0
(D
C
0-
c t
0
1+
m
3
0
n
0
>
FD'
rD
(D
(D
LA
ul
Ln
0
G)
1-1
=
0
n
(D
G)
0)
--%
0
0
-1
(D
0
--h
m
(D
Ln
3
V)
(D
<
0
>
rp
Q)
aj
CD
�O
CL
(D
=5
0
0
C2.
0
(D
0
9w
=3
U,
G)
c
n
cL
G)
r)
G)
:)o
rD m
N
n
o
0
(D
(D
v
0
Di
rD
—CU
v 0
3
3
Ln
X
C
3
3
-,
CL
V)
'+
=3
(D
CL
(D 3
(D
0
(D
0
-0
0
--1
Ln
0
0
3 (D
O
(D
0_
C
HT
0
77
(D
'0
rD
O
-
B
o
ZW
m
0 ,
(D
(D
0
(D
rD
D
rt
<
CL
cu
rD
Ln
(D
r+
cu
0
rr
0
-M
0
0
9L
3
t1i
vl_
I Ln
z
z
z
to
0
0
0
Ln
`°
0 jf� 0 :3
'.
0
rD
(D
(D
=3
U, m
=
C , OrQ 0
00
0 C:
20
Ln
LQ
w
U4
4-f)-
NJ
V)-
to
rD
m
>
r1i
FD*
i/)-
NJ
c
(D
3
Ln
�-A
P
0
o
r+
rD
LP
0
0
0
0
CL
Ln
O
0
(D
>
to
(D
n 3
cn
M 0
to
< C:
0
(D
C
0-
O
tv
O
N
O
G)
I
n�
rt
0
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
PRELIMINARY FINANCIAL REPORT FOR THE PERIOD ENDED FEBRUARY 28, 2010
This report provides preliminary financial information for the period February 2010. Approximately
16.67% of the year is completed.
K 111114=1
2010 Budget 2010 YTD Actual % of Budget
Revenues $ 5,375,404 $ 80,418 1.5%
Expenditures $5,375,404 $ 733,088 16.39%
Net Revenues Over /(Under)
Expenditures $ 0 ( 652,670)
GENERAL FUND REVENUES
General Fund revenues continue as about expected for February, considering the bulk of the city's
revenues are received with the June and December tax settlements. Building permit revenues are up
slightly over this period last year; fine and miscellaneous revenue are lagging somewhat.
GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES
General Fund expenditures are at 16.39% of budget; which is in line with 16.67% of the year completed.
Police and Fire 2010 first quarter installments have been paid, as has the first half of the County
Assessor's annual fee ($47,000). Most of the departments otherwise seem on target at this time.
Please refer to the report 'Comment' line for additional information on notable variances.
ENTERPRISE FUNDS
The results for the enterprise operating funds show they are trending on target at this time. The 2010
first quarter utility billing will be issued in early April, for the period ending March 31. The Southshore
Center revenues and expenditures are slightly higher than anticipated; there may be some cash flow
differences in what has been received or expended when compared with the financial accounting
report.
Please contact me if you have any questions about February 2010 data.
3:
LLI
0
a
Z
D
LL
Ul
Ul
Z
LIJ
0
(L
LU
K
F-
LU
F-
z
0
c.
E
0
0
Z
CL
D
w
co
uj
LL
O
O
0
0
(D _0
>
(D
E
E
C>
0
a)
ea
-0 0
0 > cu
>
O
<
N SO cr
0 0)
X
m Z, a)
Fj
-0 C)
a) o
N LL 10 < <
— i:,: M R 0
N
,::z
�o N
C\j 00 m m
1q" F �� 0 m
o o
o C\l
0) ui 'a
0 > N
0) co
(0 C\j 0 -( 0 -
'o
cc�
co m
0 cy�
0 M M
�t 10
LO h (D m
N "t
Cl)
> <
-I 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
0 0 0
0 0 -I 0
0
0 M (D 0
V
C Lo h 00 0
0
V)
r- o
(D 0 M
r-_ r- 00
G) C) N
0 Cl) 'r 'IT
r-- 10 h L "
N �D 'IT 0 0
( D C, 0
Cl) (1) 0 L
I t
CV)
Cl)
� 2
O
� �P �2 �2 'o
0 m 0 0
T
co
o
co
U,
�C�
(D
m
0 0
C
N 0 0 0 C) O C\l
Cl C)
't 00
N LO LO 0
0) a) 0 0 0
0) �t CD 0
It
0
0) r-- C3 C, CD ID -It
114 S 0 C C cc �
.1
't
0, 8 (D
N C\!
0) , 0
— —
co co r- 0 C,
C'! 0) co Lo
— m U') 0 0
'T (D a) h (D
Cl) c0 0 0
0) Lo rl_ LO
00
1-
0
0
CD
LO 0 to w w
w
- -
_,o
i N It
-
V' N C4
(6 o V' C4
C6 00 r-� r-�
C6
Gi
co
c)
c) m
(1) r-
O
0)
cq
V)
ER
eAl
QA
VJ
V>
(A
w
Efl
O C) r- fl- Cl)
f-
CY) 0 0
0) O N 0
O m 0) -q
P-
10
O C co (2 M
w
O 0 0
r-L N P
0) 0) 0
(C� (q (C) 0 3
r- (N m
C\J Co Co
C,
O CO V
N rl-L N N
N
C�
0
C) m Lf)
06
N
tl-
Cl)
—
C\j m
Cl)
C'4 } 2
CL
64
(»
69
W
(a
V' 0 M
1-1
(0 ;! Lo 'I'-- �2
0 � 0
(O N LO
m
(N
C) N V) r- m
cl � M 0 (0 1
-e
m (O
r- OD
co (D N (D
C\, (N
(D N
V'
(1)
V'
L o
(D
C D
C, 0 m
N I-- r--
6
C\i co
(I tl:
co cli
(d
(D
OD
O
FL
Cl) T
co
N
N
co
V)
64
w
6
64
O N M It 0
N
V' V' h
(O (fl O W
(O C (.0 0
C) 0 L,)
co N
C',
't
'a
' 7
m 0 C\l 0
oc� Iq Vi rl� 00 C\[ C �
a)
(C �
.0 C)
cl� (�� t
Cl) (0 't
10
(D 'IT C\j
,
(D m
m 0
OD OD
r� -
N
0
(q
v -ID
m U
LO 0
OC) M (D ZT
CN
co (D
(D 0 h
00 (1)
LI) C\i
(o (6
C\j 'T N
c,
0
N
C, a W
C) (0 LO 0
"
N
r!
'r
(D
v N
N
�2
�2
N
C', G'
<
7
LO
CL
U�l
0)
C4
»
»
64
(»
C) (D
M
a) 0)
0) N N
h IT ID
r- 0 N co
0 m rD
co
Cl)
(0 m m 0
cc r Cl i N P I
oc i
0,
0,
0 Cl) m
cct N
;V LO r�
co N ( D
co Cl)
C (N I
'T " 0 , ,
N r 'T U-1
r-
r
co
C �
O C" m
co 0 N m co
It
- - -
CIJ — N
I'- h
�2 m m
't
Z� (D
00
N
C\j
LO
u
Cl) C11
r-
CA
Cl)
F1
0 Lo ": M 0 0
M CO
0
N h m co
0) co 0 'IT
N CO
O cli 10 LO (D V) 0
h co
cli 0 co
0) m , I - co
(D rl_ N V)
m co
76
0 "t -- I P C' � L Q C D
(l! V' cy �
rl� (D
C\[ CD P
O —
13 � - •- r
a)
I q (q M -
11
-
I" !
00
0 M
N co C) co co 0
(0 cq 0
m r-:
0 1- 0 co
m rl_ 110
fl- V)
co
0 C
co t LO LO
C\l �: N "
C\j
N 1
04
'r
� 2
C-4 <
<
LQ
'r
Gq
EA
ffl
Vj
V3
0 N cl)
0
0 0 (D
LO m
V m 0 0 0
V 0
0 CO r
"I'
'IT
(D m r- o
0 (Q
-*
co CD
cq
Cl) U� 0)
(2 CQ
,) r- co co
r- C m � V� tl� It
N N
a) 10
CN to LO
(q C D LO
LO
(C�
rl-
C�
CO
O
a) 1- 00 N
M
N C)
(1)
10 co M
Z�
N —
V
0)
rl-
O U
CD (N 04
co
C\l
<
(a
to
fA
69
1 w
w
w
w
4D N
N N
0
a
CL
W U)
U) >-
"o
0
U) u
'0
rn
N i E
c - 0
70
Ga
, 0 D
X 0
> 53
0
W c
C
— P
�-
D
'
, C
-6
0
m 0
r '
- o
w : 0
U)
Z ID C>) —M
z o t5
- CL
o
, 2 '
0 a,
0 0
a
U)
W o
ULJ M r- (D-
E a
a) D m
(D CL
(D M
C OL
u (D =5 m
w C: E2 a
cc (D m
4!
> CL W 0 C
W °
2 M� [2
0
D
CL cL = C,.
X 'D 0 U)
v IL U) 0
IL : U�) 0
CL U) 0
r Cl) C)
6 - CL 2i
0: CL :j 0 IT :E
F-
uj 0 C)
LU
r LL
3:
LU
w
ui
0
C?
'7
Z
LU
LU
Z
ui
0
a.
LLJ
0
z
0
5:
E
sm 23
0
C
0
E
E
0
6
E
2
CL
N 'o E
i =1
co
CE 0 0- a) 0
E E
0)
m cu
0 C)
N (\I
O 00
m
i:� r--
00 1'-
Lo m
N 0 N
co
rl_ co 'r
. 1
N
m 0) .0
�D
> CD
-@ t
,
L Q O D
m N
cc � cl � ,
(0 m
,
0 ( Ct r
L o
cl � M V' ,
C O n a) N
01 q
Cl) U') N Cl)
CD
I
> < CL
, z
LO 0
't � D co C,
0 0)
0 Cl) r-
m
(O
0) C, 'T 0
m C O C, 0 0
rl- 0 r-_ -It 0
( D OD CD V
�2 m c)
M Co
M
C?
.,-
O OD a
CIJ ll� C�
Iq pl�
N E, 1� M
m m
9
o
9 El
C\4
M N — O
'IT "t
N
�2 5; ') g
N
"r N U)
N r CO
r- 0 1-- 0
fl- co r--
co o o
:3
cl
0 0
m a
0 C) C) 0
0 0 Cl
C) co 'r
C\j M 0 0
co 10 (D 0
(D C\j Cl) O O
LO r-_ 0 0
t-
U) a
0 C) O 0
0 a C)
lccnD:l LO C\l
m 't 0 0
r- N V 0
'T r, N m (D
00 0 0 0
(D (D rl
13 i co cl cl
OD 0 Ct
C� 00 (0
V Ot "I" oc�
r R o
-t V� r (C� oc�
C� (C� C� lO
a QI
m 't
co r (D
0(D
0 m
(D
(o I'll -
m
;: LO N M
m 'T
LO Lo CO
a) co N
- It
0
0
�2 N
to Cl)
M N
Go n
C\j
V
N
3
< M
7
—
64
69
W
Gq
E9
69
69
6s
co 0) Cl)
0 C, rl_
rl- V) 0
m LO (D
m
r-
�2 'T
co 0, "T L�
� r l'D - t
�2
m
(0 w
(2 C � l �2
C�
�2 m O
Cl i Lo
m 10 (D
C o cl� C�
a) 0
0 0 (D
10 j� : C
R Lr�
o (N m
v: C 0 0 -
O m
O 0 — u
M - -
-
CO r-
.0 0)
m m
(D
v
M t
�2 : �
co Lo 'i cl;
PO
7 a
m
Cl)
m L LO
I- (D
N
;
'o
Cl)
2
61
69
69
69
64
69
m
C 0)
0)
00 rl-
0 N
(1)
m V"
N co Cl)
Q)
N
LO
It r- 0
rl �o �2
C\j
�2 m ,
0 m �o ,
C�
Cl) IT C�
U.) M Oct Vi
m co
C� r G!
a
N V)
(D cli C4
C\l
-q r-- r
I
V o co
00 m
- -
CD� m "
rl- r- -
-
00
N
04
Vj
69
64
Vj
Iq
w
EA
U)
M m 10
N 10 (D 0
r m C)
co 0 0
0 LO t'-
CO co m (GD)
(N m N (D
M CD M M
w
76
fl- m co
V: (c l CD
0 r r 7
(0 N co 0
m C\j It
(D o m
ID
N cl �
LO m m co
'
0 'r (D (1) CNN
(3 � L 'i (0 ( D (D
w N 00
0 M
m IT N r-
C\! R rl- I Q
IT
N
-
O 0 U
O
— M
(D .1i C6 16
L6 m C4
-IT
w CI) rl-
C\, '
C) m
'IT r- (N
r- 0 U')
LO
C) m N r-
C\j (D m N
c a)
r-
0 co �l (O
N
m
N m C14
Cl) cli
(D
C)
C'4
<
w
U9
69
w
0
-It N co
OD m
co I-) CD
C,
0) Lo C\[
CD Cl) (D (D
(D V)
0)
I --
M C\l
cq 0
ai Co
cli (D
cl� co
(o
R V�
�2 cli
- I Co oo
� � co
2 2
cc r-
(N
c-
m C
LO 0 l
Q
®
'IT
0 00 LO
O m
o
-
�2 co C4
N
06
Cl) "I'
m
CD
(6
0
N
N
�2
(D co
C,
co
Vj
69
69
EA
M
69
69
a) 0 0
04 C)
N m
V)
,t - � w
r w 00 Lo to
(o O)o
r- m 'r
V'
r� 00 (N
(
0, co V
LO U) co
10 0
CO C� Ct
co N
Ct Vi V�
co m
M M V)
m M C) (0
r"i m Lo Co
r- CC) C)
LO co - C\! P
C> 0) 00
(0- a, - C'�
co
O
M N
(D (d 'i
10
;�;
m m
N CD
r- r- LO
10 r- (D
a)
�2 0 C\j
r-
C c r-
Cl (N N
04
m a
� 3 2 C.
co
C\j �2
(D
�2 cq
r�
�T
69
69
fH
69
69
M
64
Gq
Cl) 0) I 0
0) r�
-It LO
(0 m
't
(D It 0 LO
LO 10 a) 0
V)
N
0 Rl "r N
O C\ Cl)
0) N UO
p V:
co Cl
0
�;
Cc� OD
Co Co
to
0 (N m m m
M rl-
CY) m It 0
N C\� Co C'
C) 10 rl_
0 'D 0
r- ce) N
C')
00
0) 0)
0
r- 0)
'IT
06 m
(0
00
C\1
M
C,
69
(a
w
co
(n
69
69
Gl3
T
(D
7a
I
- a 0
'a
2 "a c)
'a
0- 9
m CL
.
i>
ul
=1
CO
N U)
0 10
ID
0
u
a) 0 a)
U) U)
m o u
U)
U% I
>-
U)
L
U) 75
.6
m
c m 0
6 m
Ln 0
Co o
0
r 6 m
0
m
0
o
. c
0 �6
=
0
0
m C: 0 w
0 0
0
CD
0
0
�B
0 -
0
42
r 9 cc",
6 (u S m
0
m
n
a ) M m
w
n
K
- ffi ID u
e
w (D co M
ma (D
'Fu
CL :2 U) C)
co C)
0 U)
U) 0
0
U) IL 2E U) 0
m CL U() C)
V) 0
0
.2
CL
F-I CL I
H LL
F 5
H U
H CL
H U)
LJ—
W
W
0
C?
Z
w
Z
W
F-
x
0
CL
w
M
O
Z
0
a
0
LL
E
c:
E
0
0
0-
.-
10
LU
C)
w co
(0
(0
(D
> _(D
n c�
Ci !a
oz� V
O
CD
'D
M
'D
(D
> < (L
00
t- (D to
LO 0 0
1� 00 0
r r--
m
V� E; Ei
0) O V
Ei E5
E;
(q 0 0 a
M O
E,
m
< 'a
CN r
0 O L�2
�2 o o
m o C, r-
n
(P m to V;
V
�2
�2
CD
C'4
r- I-
'IT 00)
m 0 C)
0 m 0 O
0) 0 0
V 0
-It
M-
r- C) 'IT
C) 0
0 1l- 00
r- m , :,
N
C) 0
C)
O N G1
M
ct 0
CD m
m N f L o
Vi q. n
C,
' t
cp
0 Lo
LO (D tO
V
Ir
C. m N
a)
m C\l
V)
0
m
(C)
I C,
r-
cq .
<
6s
Vj
69
6q
69
E 09
44
69
r- C) 00
00 Cl) Cl)
fl- 0 0 0
0 1-- Cl)
fl-
N -
fl-
(N
( N L Q
r- C) 0
0 L O
0 00 Cl)
LO r t,
OD �)
m m 'r CN
00 "r (
L O f pl Vi
00
V
'
r
a)
N 1
m fl-
M
N C\l
m (0 N
04
m
C4
m
N
0)
't
,4
co
m
(L
69
69
69
69
U4
69 69
69
69
0) V
C\l
N C.
0 Lf) 'r
0) co .0 ol
co -
00
a
7E
cq 0)
( C� L Q
C\1 (D
C C�
(D 00
C o c�
C)
R
OD m m
C� OD V
N
c
00
C�
00
Ci
fl-
X�
(N ��l
(N
(D
Cl)
(0 Cl)
Cl) Lo
Lo LO �
0
P,
co
N >� (.)
<
fl.
I--
�
V3
w
w
u'>
w
69
w
V3
C. !�2
m �
LO N N -
'2
o
(9
N
(0
I- 'r
(N LO - I -, 1
1 0
ID
It
N
m
O 0 0
m 0
m m n
ID
I- cq
N I- m
r r- O W
m
f, C,
rl
1n
O C . 0
C
m m
m
cl � M
C>
Il i
<
In
0) fl-
ID
0 0)
0) V 0 m
0
N cq
:
0
0.
N 00
rl- o -- o-
m
"T
n
c c
m
m
I D
CD
q
n
C9 -
0 �2
(N
(D
'IT
0 0
CD
(D
(0
N
6a
w
U
I
69
I
w
w
.. 69
I
w
w
LO
0 (
r- LO N OD
(D N CO LO
N �2 N
W)
m 0
co
00
1-
oc� r
0 r- (D
( Q cc� (C�
co C) ( CD
(O S - (o -
Cl) r Cl) r-_
t 0 C M I
00
Co 00 C\l
L,)
C
m 0
C 0
co
C\!
0
V
M V
00 C\l Cl)
(C) C\j r-
0) 0) V
V a; V L6
CY)
Lo Lo
0
Cl)
N r-
�2
11
C N
*
cl�
Cl)
N
tO
< <
*
U')
LO m
00
00
OD 0) 00 (D
(D
CD m
(3) Cl)
N R
C\l
Lo
LO
LO
I-
i . . .
r-
lll� �2 ID Vi Cl)
- It
Cl)
w (C) N
cl
ai � P
p 0
0) N
N
00 m m
cq r <
69
ca
vi
S U) .. 69 69
2
0
4=
V) W
CL
a
a)
a)
x
CL L)
O
Q
0 CL
W
U)
a)
a)
S
C a)
cl :3 m 'a
'o
U) >
m
CO >1
x a
m
LU 'a D
to
o
t�
lu o
CL CL ID
a
m c
0 0-
cl
Li , 0
0 Z
0 0
a 0
m 0
co x x >
w W 0
E2 a)
.2 E2 S� CL - a
- i6 t�:
E2 CL OL
E2
0 a) 2i m
a- U) 0
w cc
maw C)
ma z
m U) 0
m 03 6)
a- U) U
(D
- 6 a-
>
r
U)
cn
E
0
L)
L m
1 6
ui
w
(L
CD
cli
D
ui
U-
0
0-
fn
G)
M M
M
0)
0)
0 > 0)
v m 0)
CO c, m co
CO
Lr�
LQ
Lo
Cl)
> CL
B
0O 10 10
0
0 0 0 0 1
= z
V - 0)
C\j 'Ir (D
CO ( D 't 0
w
0)
m
(D 4- r-- 0 m
(D
N
N
C\l
CD
O 0
CN
0 0 0
C)
C14 0 0,� 0
M
m
co
00 0
a
0, S 0 0
a)
m
0)
03
C,
0 0- C�
C�
rl- n m U�
c
C\!
C\!
N
S
0 0 M
m
t-- 0 N N co
:�
m
0)
0)
(D
0 0
C.4
00
a)
M M
C
n
Co
iA
ca
6s
(A
co 0
Cl)
cli 00 co m C)
m
Cl)
m
F
a — ,
no
0 0 C
Cl)
oc�
co O co m 0
tc� Vi mm CD
1-
C�
r�
C�
fl-
C�
Cl)
C\[
CD
0
r�
1� 0 C3
(D LO
M
m
co
Cl)
co
M
r-
(D
O
C',
N
Cl)
m
m
609.
61�
69
69
6s
(0 LO r-
a)
Cl) LO -ql
Lo
tD
LO
0
LO Vt IT
m
11
Lq
Cl) I--
r-
r-
r-
C\l
00
r—
LO
co
co -It Cl)
C-4 L)
Cl)
61)
64
61)
0 C) C,
0
r r- t O 0 00
0
w o C)
ID C) CD
co
tc�
(D C11 CD It
'T (C� 0)
r-
oc�
ll�
cc�
O C
C6 cr; (6
U') �
co
m
c; 0) (o co
m Cl) 0) C\l
m
CD
m
0
m
0
t7
C ,
C"
n V'
C�
C �
O
Gq
6s
w
0 0
0
r- -T LO (D
C14
C\l
C\l
M
OD 0
V� M
co
n
C\j C> It m
( C ci c CD
co
a�
10
0)
co
01
CO
U
(D 0)
CO
LO
CO
rl- N C\j CN
cq
N
6s
fR
fA
Efl
(9
C\j r (D
0)
0) 00 U') 00
v
'T
77
'o
u
N O (D
M 0)
0
co
co
co Cl) 31 V 00
1- 0 LO 0 LO
- - - -
L,)
a�
m
ai
LO
CD
(0
C�
00
O
't (0 cD
f-
W
U') co (D �2 C\1
0) U') 't 0)
C', M
N
N
CN
UO
N
T -
co
C0
44
ul
(s
00
co
0 IT 00 C) (D
B
CY)
a)
(1) (D m C) It
't PI P 0 1 0
M
Vi
M
"i
M
LO -
")
oc�
CD ~
C14 u
cq 00 0 (NI N
— LO m
(N
(D
Cq
m
(0
n
(D
Cl)
OD
ol
40>
0")
44
6s
w
0)
U)
- a
a
r_
'0
c
c
0)
CL
LL
x
w
c Q)
CL > a,
D i-
U) U)
N -
-E
E
U)
2 2
0
LU
'
0
W e a
0 E2
cu ac
�
D > 12
In
tf a)
0 - F, U)
a.
x x
>
z Ir
z uj
WSW
0
w
w
OL
U
M
m 0 C-) 0
P
- 6 [2 75
w CL
Q� U)
o
F-
x
w
0
I.-
C
m
LU
0 E
C? 0
F
Z
0
CL
Lu
uj
m 0-
(D CD
a C ,
D C'4
co
j
ix
z
0 m Lu
E LL
O
0
U-
w
2
0 'E
'E
E
E
0
00
0
O m
co
M
q"
't
Cl)
>
-
r-, ,
'IT
0
r--w
cl�
C11
(0
N
N
co
C11
ll-�
�t
Co
2
> < EL
0)
0
0 Lf) CD
(D
(0 OD (D 0 0
'o M (D 0 0
0
C\l
0
V
0�0
p "
oo
ll'
Q m
m oo.-
M M C) 0 0
(D
00
cl)
R 2
u)
(2 LO
oo
0 0
C11
0 0 0
CD
0
S S 0
CO M C�
CD
a�
C, L(n N C�'
m LO u) S
00
oc�
oo
cc�
0 oo
C� cc�
w
0 )
0
a)
- - -
0; 'r 0 C)
CD
C)
0 C)
6
0
M (N (D
m
w
cn
fl- " C)
oo qt O
a)
M
0)
cl�
0 m
0 co
N
Ili
. =
< CO
—
N
—
— N
69
f9
64
69
61)
69
C)
C)
0) LO 0 C)
It
�t
0 'T
U)
") " 0 C)
cli (Q C� CD
=
C�
M
C�
0 w
CD CD
cl)
lj�
C ,
(0-0 o1-
1--
0 PI-
0
0 0
0
0) 0
0
N M 0
A rl-: N 0
m
ci
M
cli
0 (1)
ci co
0
C\�
0 -
a
CD
0 C)
(D
L)
m 0
0
(D
ll�
C)
N
0
0 N
N
613,
va
E9
69
V3
f9
0 0
m ID
co
co
co
N R
O o
cl� O
O �
co co
N C� - I L'I
C"
17�
m
C�
m
M
C�
cn
-
N (o C5
m
m (0 It N
-
, r
(0
m
m
co V —
co
m
0)
m
E9
f9
(4
64
M
Qf)
rl_ co
C4
N
N
m m
C�
C�
C�
co Cl
co c,
In
In -
�o
LO
=
CD — M
— cO
00
m
oo
m
oo
m
0
N
to
U-1
to
w
69
M N oo M
rn
T —0
o
M
�2 0) ' L�
00 m
CD
d ci C5
oc
g
cl) (14 (f)
Cq
oD N N
m C\l
C', a
oo
to
e9
(0 v)
co m
�2
m
R
cl)
'IT
C\!
u
ai
ai
0
N
N
N
oo
C-4 > L
CL
x
a-
5
E
0
of
W
u
-0,
m E
w
c:
M o
( o 0)
LU w (U >
< > 0
a (u
CL 0-
x x
>
Z Of
-7 0
z Lij
0 m w
0 —
W) 11 �)
-j W W
0
LLJ
d
(D n m (L)
w
> M
uj
0 x w
a_ U)
0
>
U)
uj U)
3:
LU
LU
0
F7
CL
O E
z 0
UJ
F-
0
F-
�
( L
W
w LLJ
Q.
C-4
z
0 LU
E LL
0
0)
0 n
C, N
clj
cj
RCo a
m IT
G�
(o
G�
(D
a
(o
Y)
Q >
cl!
M
cl�
lD
(D
- t E
> < (L
(D "T 0
1 0 ( R o
�2
m w O (D
co N 't C, (D
w
N
OD
"
m
"
m
CO
< 'a
� O O
r
(o M N r 0 0
.4
VT
R
c> 0
04
rl o c>
c
N
N
c S ,
o
') o o(o
N
(N
N
04
O d,
67 ZL
r c \l
Lo r_� co
c
o
n co ( D c
oD M rl-
L q
!; R
cc�
- a
0
o
(14
CO
-, M
N
04
M
Ln
Lr)
Lo
NS
<
Q).
EA
69
69
Q�l
(n
M
O
CD
C0
I l j
co
cli
(o U) (D C)
c� lf � Tt ct
cI t
-D
c
N
N
Cl l
O C,
U
r
oo r o) I—
to
C-4
(D
cN
(D
c\l
C'4
6s
E4
6s
U�
Cl) Cl)
V)
P- (D n
:�
—T
G�
O m
CD (N
O
N
o o
C. Cl) lo oo
cl�
oc
CD
(1)
M
cN
Cl) Lr;
—
04
ID cl
co I-
m
m
o'
co
cD
N
r
co (o
w
(D
O
-Q.
ID
m
vq
Aa
to
64
EA
69
oo tl-
w)
o CD
(D
'o
'o
m m
clj o
lo oo
m
m
W
I-- (c) -
-
m
o)
a)
co
(o
g
N
(D
r.
lo
Fq
69
W,
69
64
Lo
Cl N N
co
0 V
N o) co
lr� N
V
V
7
0
p m
�2 rl_ m
co
co
(D
c,
(D
(N
C4
oo
49
Ni
64
6
69
O oo
m
co
co
m
(D
(:� ')
q�
rl-
, 01
CD
m
m
N (D
04
N
N
64
6H
69
V)
fA
ID
"o
W u)
o
u) )
W n (n
W o
S E
Q -o
-a D
r ,
LL,
co 0
0
> a)
o - F u)
O. 4)
x x >
z of
z o 4)
W W 0
ul
> c
LU cr e c,
(L 0
"R
=
LLI 12
0
x CL U) C) 0
>
w 2 F
-
LU (f)
3r
W
UY
W
>
O
9
F-
}
Za
� N
LL y
w
z )
W U
U ` m
m
0 w
O O
2
� o
= n
O
a
x W
w o-
d o
m N
J �
S Q
Z
O m Lu
E LL
y
O
U
gr (6 a
N
6>
N
r-
M O
O V
L)
V'
(D
r
(D
r
M
t`
U> d
'
N
� O
� V
> Q d
(0
0 0
0
0 0 0 0 0
0
0
0
0
7 G1
V 0 Qf
s- O
. cO
u)
O
V) M O O O
N V 0000
N
N
O
N
W
N
Q R=
Cl
M
N
N o O O O
M
m
N
(h
N
M
N
th
N
O n .O
O O
N
O O
O
O O
O
O
(D
(D
a
O y y
co V)
N D
M
a
, O u)
N O
ems-
N
N
o
� M
n
n
n
N
0 a
v
v
v
(n
u)
u)
N O 3
Q m
69
V3
69
69
69
69
M N
c0
O co
(D
(D
(D
N
N
N N
7
' N M' '
h
(N
' (N
O
O
O F N
n
n
N rl-
Q1
m
O
N
N } O
CL`
I- M
n (O
O
(D
r- V
m r�
r
r
O Q N
V7
n
N M
O
O
m
M
M
M
N
N } Q
(A
fA
69
69
V)
(0 R
CO co
(P (O
n
�
V '- 'o
N 'd' c0 '
M M
M
M
M
' M
O
d'
Q1
O c O
O V
M
M
r() r
n
M
=
N Q Q
N
(U
W C) A
9
N }
Z >
Z >
Q
Q
Q
E9
69
V3
69
V3
N
(D
CO N
O= O
0 0
O@
N
Z
Z
Q Q
Q
Q
c4
(»
(fl
(»
aD D m
O F O
p
fl
p
N} Q
Z '(p
m
Z m
m
Q
Q
6Rb
6A
»
(n
»
N
w
N
c
LU
v
X
U N
Z oa
W
cn
- C
U) N E
d' of 'O m V O
a a
O
uj U C
LL
O O N C
~= N m 0
..�
O
O
Z
N
O O R V- _ w�.-
Q�
Q Q tU
(D �-J
Z= cJ
Q
W W O
—
U C
(6 (6 N (6
c o N
>
W c .� @
O �(�UOF` -O
W U2F-O
W
F I-- LY