05-24-10 CC Reg Mtg AgPCITE' OF SHOREWOOD
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
MONDAY, MAY 24, 2010
1. CONVENE CITY COUNCIL MEETING
A. Roll Call
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
7:00 P.M.
Mayor Lizee
Bailey
Turgeon _
Woodruff _
Zerby
B. Review Agenda
2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. Joint City Council /Planning Commission Meeting Minutes, 5/4/10
B. Joint City Council /Park Commission Meeting Minutes, 5110/10
C. City Council Regular Meeting Minutes, 5110/10
3. CONSENT AGENDA
Motion to approve items on Consent Agenda & Adopt Resolutions Therein:
NOTE: Give the public an opportunity to request an item be removed from the
Consent Agenda. Comments can be taken or questions asked following removal
from Consent Agenda
A. Approval of the Verified Claims List
B. City of Mound Fire Contract
C. Personnel Action
D. Accept bids and award contract for sealcoat project, City Project No. 10 -07
E. Change Order 1 for the 2010 Street, Drainage, and Utility Improvements
F. Authorize Expenditure of Funds for Playground Equipment Improvements
G. Accept Proposal for Safe Assure
Minutes
Minutes
Minutes
Claims List
Administrator CAF
Administrator CAF
Engineer's CAF,
Resolution
Engineer's CAF,
Resolution
Park Asst's CAF
Director of Public
Works CAF
4. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR
(No Council action will be taken)
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA - -- MAY 2 , 2010
Page 2 of
. PUBLIC FEARING
Phelps Bay Milfoil Treatment
6< REPORTS AND PRESENTATIONS
B.
A. Tad Shaw, Board Representative, Minnetonka Community Education report
Deputy Clerk's CAF
B. Linda Murrell, Director, South -Lake Excelsior Chamber of Commerce,
Administrator CAF
Request for Funding for the Lake Minnetonka 4` of July Celebration
7. PARKS - Report by Representative
Draft Ordinance
8. PLANNING - Report by Representative
Deer Management Policy
A. Brockwood Final Development Plat
Planning Director's
CAF; Resolution
B. Ordinance Amending Chapter 1201.03 of the City Code relating to Campaign
Planning Director's
Signs
CAF; Draft
Ordinance
C. Comprehensive Plan Final Draft
Planning Director's
Planning Director
CAF
9. ENGINEERING/PUBLIC WORKS
A. Drainage Issue — 5570 Harding Lane Administrator CAF
B. Update on Request for Proposals for SCADA Design Build Director of Public
Works CAF
10. GENERAL/NEW BUSINESS
A.
Phelps Bay Milfoil Treatment
Administrator CAF
B.
Southshore Community Center
Administrator CAF
C.
Park Commission Ordinance
Administrator CAF
Draft Ordinance
D.
Deer Management Policy
Planning Director
CAF
E.
Park Commission Appointment
Administrators CAF
Resolution
F.
Incidental Use of Right -of -Way Permit
Planning Director
Applicant: Carol Koehnen
CAF
Location: 26020 Valleywood Lane
CITY COUNCIL REGIJI,AR MEETING AGENDA -- MAY 24, 2010
Page 3 of
11. STAFF AND COUNCIL + O 1'S
A, Administrator and Staff
April 2010 Financial Report
s s
� s' • �. s
IEl�\ 13 1911 Hl � 1
� rr
Shorewood City Council Regular Meeting
Monday, 24 May, 2010
7 :00 p.m.
A 6:00 P.M. Special meeting is scheduled to interview Park Commission candidates.
A 6:30 P.M. Council Work Session is scheduled this evening.
Agenda Item 43A: Enclosed is the Verified Claims List for Council approval.
Agenda Item #313: The City of Shorewood contracts with the City of Mound to provide fire
service to Enchanted Island. Spring Park, one of the other cities in the agreement, raised a
few issues with the division of the costs for debt service on the fire building. These issues
were discussed and an amended agreement is provided. The changes to the agreement do
not affect the amount that Shorewood pays for services, as the base formula did not
change. Staff recommends approving the amended agreement.
Agenda Item #3C: Bonnie Burton, Finance Director, submitted a letter of resignation. Her last
day with the city is May 28. Staff recommends Council accept the resignation and
authorize the administrator to begin recruitment to fill the position.
Agenda Item #31): Bids were received, opened, and tabulated on May 19"' for the bituminous
seal coating of roadways for the Cites of Shorewood and Tonka Bay. Allied Blacktop Co.
is the lowest bidder with a total bid for all the Cities of $164,980.00. The City of
Shorewood's portion of this project is $124,550.00 Staff recommends approval of a
resolution that awards a contract of $124,550.00 to Allied Blacktop Co.
Agenda Item 43E: On April 7, 2010, the City Council entered into a contract with W. M.
Mueller & Sons, Inc. for the 2010 Street, Drainage, and Utility Improvements. Due to
easement changes the storm sewer changed. Staff recommends approval of a resolution
that approves Change Order No. 1 for the Project, in the amount of - $8,132.13.
Agenda Item #31 The Park Commission reviewed the playground equipment improvements
and recommendations from Public Works staff. Staff recommends that the City Council
authorize expenditure of funds in the amount of $3,601.61 for the playground equipment
improvements.
Agenda Item #3G: Staff is recommending approval of a motion accepting the proposal from
Safe Assure Consultants, for an amount not to exceed $2,775.
Agenda Item #5A: No public hearings.
Executive Sup unary — City Council Meeting of May 24, 2 10
Page 2 of 2
Agenda Item 46A: Tad Shaw, Mi ietonka Community Education (MCI✓) Board
Representative,, will be present to report on MCE activities.
Agenda Item #613: Linda Murrell, Director of the South -Lake Excelsior Chamber of
Commerce, will be present to review the 4 1h of July activities and funding request.
Agenda Item #7: Park Commissioner Suzanne Oaidos will report on the recent Park
Commission meeting.
Agenda Item #8A: Brent Hislop has requested a final plat approval for his Brockwood
subdivision (two lots between Cathcart Drive and Strawberry Lane). A draft resoluti
and development agreement is incld - - in for your consideratio
Agenda Item #813: This item was pulled from the last agenda to address issues raised by the
City Attorney. The present draft complies with recent changes to State Statutes relative
to campaign signs.
Agenda Item #8C: A final draft of the 2009 Comprehensive Plan Update is enclosed for your
review. This draft contains all the text and map changes required by Met Council. Staff
suggests that we be directed to prepare a resolution of adoption at the next meeting.
Agenda Item #9A: Mr. Michels contacted staff about a drainage issue at 5570 Harding Lane.
A chronology of this issue is provided for council to review. Staff suggests plantings to
screen the drainage area and create a buffer area.
Agenda Item #913: On April 12, 2010, the City Council authorized publication of the Request
for Proposals (RFP) for the SCADA controls and Electrical Control Panels for Lift
Stations 15 and 17 on Enchanted and Shady Islands. As such, the RFD's were published
and distributed to various vendors. Staff will update the City Council as to the progress
of this process. No action is required for this item.
Agenda Item #10A: Staff recommends council approve and authorize reimbursement for the
milfoil treatment costs of Phelps Bay, as provided in the 2010 budget.
Agenda Item #1013: The Southshore Community Center operations committee met to discuss
the issue of compensation for Community Rec. Resources (CRR). The committee is
recommending increasing the base pay for the contract from $10,000 to $15,000 and the
incentive pay from 15% to 20% of the rental fees, as well as incentive pay on community
events where rent is not collected. The recommended changes would be effective July 1,
2010. This moves the increase ahead of schedule by 6 months. Staff recommends council
approve the changes to the agreement as recommended by the operations committee.
Agenda Item #IOC: Council directed staff to review and proposed amendments to the Park
Commission ordinance regarding appointment, removal, and attendance. Staff
recommends council approve the amendments as recommended.
Agenda Item #I OD: Staff has arranged for the Metro Bowhunters Resource Board to conduct
its deer management efforts for 2010. The MBRB has suggested dates for hunts and staff
Executive Summary - City Council Meeting of May 24, 201
Page 3 of 2
has gone over the hunt rules for 2010 with Bob Whiting, President of MBR13. Approval
of the dates is necessary for MBR-B to schedule hunters and a training/orientation session,
Agenda Item #I OE: Earlier this evening the City Council interviewed three individuals for
consideration of appointment to the Park- Commission to fill the to ending February 28,
2011 If an appointment is made, this is to be done by resolution,
Agenda Item #I OF: Carol Koehnen has requested and incidental use of the right-of-way permit
to upgrade the existing driveway that serves her two properties on Valleywood Lane. The
proposed improvement is necessary to make her vacant lot buildable and provides better
fire equipment access for the three properties served by the existing driveway. Staff has
recommended approval • the permit, subject to conditions.
Agenda Item #12A: Recess to Executive Session- Ron Johnson Litigation
[
MINUTES
1. CONVENE JOINT CITY COUNCIL D PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
Mayor Liz6e convened the Joint Meeting at 6:00 p.m.
A. Roll Call
Present: Mayor Liz6e; Councilmembers Turgeon, Woodruff and Zerby; Administrator Heck; and
Planning Director Nielsen
Planning Conunission Chair Geng; Planning Commissioners Davis, Hasek (arrived at
6:01 P.M.), Hutchins, Ruoff, and Vilett (arrived at 6:02 P.M.)
Absent: Councilmember Bailey; Planning Commissioner Amst
Mayor Liz6e welcomed the Planning Commissioners. She turned control of the meeting over to Director
Nielsen and Planning Commission Chair Geng.
Director Nielsen stated the Planning Commission is well into its 2010 work program and as of now is
right on schedule. The most significant and time consuming task is the Smithtown Crossing
redevelopment plan. The Commission will discuss the topic again during its meeting immediately
following this meeting. The owners of the properties in this area are going to be invited to the next
Commission meeting scheduled for May 1 S ". The Commission will tell the property owners of the
discussions it has had to date about this item and it hopes to find out what the property owners' long -term
plans are for their properties. The Commission hopes to invite developers to its meeting scheduled for
June 1 St to review current development rules and regulations and what the broad vision is in the
Comprehensive Plan (Comp Plan) for the area. The Commission also wants to solicit feedback from the
developers on what significant problems they could foresee with the rules and regulations, and the vision.
The Commission thought it important for the rules and regulations to be realistic.
Nielsen explained the area the Commission is considering at this time. Gideon Glen is the north boundary
of the commercial area in the northwest quadrant of the Smithtown Crossing area. On the corner is the
old gas station property (which is owned by the American Legion), and next to it on the west is the
American Legion facility. West of that is the Burry property. Then there is the old apartment building.
There is a vacant lot next to that which is owned by the American Legion. The western boundary has
intentionally been left vague. A developer may want to acquire a couple of the single family residential
JOIST CITY COUNCIL AND PLANNING COMMISSION MEETIN
May 4, 2010
Fags 2 of 7
properties to the west. North of the gas station property is the old carpet store, which is now owned and
occupied by Heartbreaker.
Nielsen then reviewed the southeast quadrant of the Smithtown Crossing area. It includes the gas station
on the corner, the car lot, the transmission shop, and the car wash. Each of those properties has a
different owner. On the easterly end of the northeast quadrant of Smithtown Crossing there is a single
family home, next to the chocolate factory, which is surrounded by either commercial or public property.
The probability of that property being reused someday is high. He anticipates that someday an R -C use
may be appropriate for redevelopment of that property. He noted the property owners have not discussed
selling the property with the City. He stated the County Load 19 Corridor Study states a goal of trying to
put some type of pedestrian crossing below grade; therefore, it would be nice to connect Badger Park
with the L,RT Trail north of the public safety facility.
Nielsen stated there are a number of issues with the properties in the study area. There are low - value, and
in some cases almost dilapidated, buildings and substandard buildings. There are nonconforming land
uses. There are a number of planning issues for the area. The Commission discussed the pros and cons of
what the Comp Plan calls for which is a unified development for the northwest corner and also the
southeast conger, or possibly all of the area. The Commission thought it prudent to be prepared for the
situation where someone wants to redevelop an individual property and that proposed redevelopment
satisfies the City's ordinances. The redevelopment plan he and the Commission are working on will
address that also.
Nielsen then stated that durrng=its.last ixzeeiirr ;the Cprrrmissnou started w�" on a vision statement for
what the City hopes to see in that:re&veloped area =.'-ire vision will elaborate on what's stated in the
Comp Plan. The Commission will:ieohtinue that discussion during its meeting following this one. The
vision statement talks about. pedeatrianEaccess ` othe existi ngpedestrian / bicycle facilities.
There is some potential to extend a pedestrian area along the southerly boundary of the study area on the
west. The purpose of the vision statement is intended to market the area.
Commissioner Vilett stated the vision is to redevelop the study area such that it has a community feeling.
Director Nielsen stated the Commission has discussed a redevelopment project being a mixed use
project. The Commission is looking at what can be updated in the City Ordinances to further that. The
Comp Plan suggests a mixed use of senior housing and commercial. He commented that Administrator
Heck and he are planning to meet next week with a representative from Ehlers. The representative has
development contacts that are willing to review what the potential could be for redeveloping the area.
The City Ordinance has a planned unit development (P.U.D.) section and it has a section that indicates
commercial and residential can be mixed. The Commission will be looking at elaborating on the mixed
use requirements. To date the discussion has been about a mixed use development on the northwest
quadrant of the area.
Nielsen explained mixed use can be achieved in a number of ways. One is vertical mixed use with
commercial on the bottom and residential on the top. He stated he has heard from developers that vertical
mixed use developments are not going over as well as they would like. Developers have suggested a
horizontal mixed use development may be a better approach. Part of the northwest quadrant would be
devoted to commercial development and part of it residential. For the commercial part there maybe
commercial on the bottom of the building and office space above it, noting that isn't quite considered
mixed use and that can be done in the City's commercial zoning district.
JOINT CITY COUNCIL 7 D PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
May 4, 2010
Page 3 of 7
Nielsen reviewed some sketches Commissioner Hasek did for the Commission, noting he found them
quite useful.
Nielsen explained it would be extremely inefficient to redevelop each of the properties individually. The
Commission intends to convey that to the property owners. Each property would have to contend with its
own drainage issues and its own parking requirements. If, for example, the northwest quadrant was
developed in a unified manner there could be one stormwater ponding area. The scale of the project
could be such that there could be some type of underground storage for stormwater, noting this is true for
both the northwest and southeast quadrants.
Commissioner Vilett stated she thought from an economic perspective the property owners may be able
to sell their property for a higher price if it's sold with the other properties.
Councilmember Zerby stated it's his understanding that there is a business looking into the possibility of
purchasing the old gas station property in the northwest quadrant. Director Nielsen stated he has heard
the same thing.
Director Nielsen stated he would be concerned if someone purchases a property in the subject area and
then wants to rebuild the site. If they just use the property as is that is not as concerning to him.
Nielsen explained the American Legion has done some ground testing of its properties. He stated the
American Legion is a key player in the redevelopment of the northwest quadrant. It owns the property the
American Legion is on, th6 01d :gas station pfopeity - and the v=acant pr0p&11y. He related that when a
previous plamling commissioner was looking intci r evelopmg the area for a firm the Legion had
expressed it would be willing to swap land f r a n ti , iserican Legion facility noting the Legion wants
to have a separate facility
W i th from Couzity Road 1
Councilmember Turgeon commented that from her perspective the American Legion organization is kind
of the holdup of the redevelopment of the northwest quadrant.
Director Nielsen stated he thought the best way to have the American Legion get on board with anything
is for someone to come to them and present a package that satisfies the wants it has.
Mayor Liz6e stated the important thing is for the Commission to continue to create a broad vision for the
area. She thought it's great that the Commission is going to meet with the property owners as a group to
hear from them what transitions they envision. She also thought it's great that the Commission is going to
meet with land developers to get their views on potential developments as well as constraints. She
thought the Commission, the property owners and the developers could all be contributors to a high level
vision for the area. She thought the City should help them make this a great community spot.
Councilmember Turgeon stated she thought it's important to explain to the property owners what the
requirements would be to redevelop their properties individually.
In response to a comment by Councilmember Woodruff, Director Nielsen explained he thought the total
combined study area on the northwest quadrant was approximately 6.5 acres and the area on the
southeast quadrant was approximately 4 acres.
Commissioner Davis stated she agreed with Mayor Liz& She thought if the Commission got the people
together and formed somewhat of a team she thought the American Legion would be receptive to things.
JOINT CITY COUNCIL CIL AND PLANNING COMMISSION M r!NG
May 4. 2010
Page 4 of T
Councilmember Turgeon stated she thought there were two camps of people that will impact things with
the American Legion, There is an old commodore who is not interested in change. There is a new
commodore who is interested in making changes to improve things. She indicated she thought the Legion
would be the hiccup for the northwest quadrant. She also thought Heartbreaker could be an issue because
they just purchased the property and it paid more than it was worth. Director Nielsen stated he thought it
was a good thing that Heartbreaker didn't build a new building. Mayor Liz6e stated she thought
Heartbreaker understood the issues as it was involved in the development across County Road 19 in
Tonka Bay.
Commissioner Vilett stated she thought it would be prudent to present information in the most positive
way possible. She also thought it would be important to convey to property owners in a gentle way that
their properties will go down in value if surrounding properties are redeveloped and theirs aren't.
Director Nielsen stated in all reality the two quadrants will likely be redeveloped somewhere between
piecemeal and ideal.
Administrator Heck stated he thought it would be important to have different options available to discuss
with the property owners. He commented that land exchanges can occur as part of a deal.
Planning Commission Chair Geng stated he thought a key element of the discussion with the property
owners would be to discuss the difficulties there will be with piecemeal development under current
zoning requirements. . .
Councilmember Zerby stated he wasn't sure that Erbn ,a busrne`ss perspective the return -on- investment is
there for redeveloping the`. t?rtb Est quadran The traffic f ow is extreri ely heavy. It's located in the
middle of a "bedroom community ". There are properties along Highway 7 that are for sale. The office
building along County Road 19 in Shorewood still has vacancies. There has been discussion going on for
some time about expanding the Tonka Village Shopping Center and that hasn't occurred.
Commissioner Vilett stated the Commission has been discussing what could the City do (such as tax
increment financing) to make the area attractive to developers.
Councilmember Turgeon stated she wanted to back away from the use of the words "senior housing"
when speaking about mixed use. Director Nielsen noted the Comp Plan says states senior housing.
Turgeon stated mixed use could be retail on the bottom and apartments /condos on the top. Nielsen
explained that senior housing can be higher density. Nielsen questioned if the City offered enough higher
density for senior housing. Nielsen stated he thought it would a lot easier to convince the residential area
to the west that senior housing would be an easier transition than multiple family housing. Turgeon stated
she did not think it would make any difference to the residents if a three -story building contained senior
housing or multiple family housing.
Mayor Liz6e stated the City has to decide if it wants to allow life cycle housing. It appears that residents
want to remain in the community. For example, the Shorewood Ponds development filled up; there has
been good retention of the senior housing property owners. She thought life cycle housing may help the
real estate market. The schools in the area are filled. If a higher density housing development could be
developed in the study area that would be great. She commented a 6.4 acre site isn't all that large. She
expressed her support for life cycle housing in the City.
JOINT CITE' COUNCIL AND LANNING COMMISSION MEETING
May 4, 2010
Page 5 of 7
Councilmember Turgeon stated there were not a lot of starter homes in the City. There isn't much to
offer 20 — 30 year olds. Mayor Liz& stated that's in part because a lot of the senior residents are
remaining in their homes. Turgeon stated there are a few pockets of them but they are very expensive
because of acreage requirements. Turgeon then stated that from her perspective life cycle housing starts
when a child gets out of college until they no longer want to remain in their home.
Commissioner Vilett stated it is her understanding that it was difficult for a former planning
commissioner to identify a way to make the development of the northwest quadrant financially feasible
because of density limitations. Director Nielsen explained that individual couldn't even make it
financially feasible even if some type of tax increment financing was available because of the current
density limitations.
Director Nielsen commented that he has been speaking with a developer who may have some interest in
the northwest quadrant, but he has higher density requirements than currently allowed. Nielsen stated the
Planning Commission wants some type of mixed use development in that area but it did not specify any
specific percent.
Commissioner Hasek stated he actually wanted to include the residential properties between the subject
area and up to Christopher Road.
Councilmember Zerby stated he lives on Christopher Road. He built his home 16 years ago along with
other property owners. He noted that only two properties have been turned over in 20 years. He
commented the community,-
ommunity -is'a °very tk�iit co runty After thewreabet ben :Christopher Road and the
subject area was cleared r6'idents=:cail see the neon 46hts, - got something they relish. He stated if the
residential area is also cleared ouflhe ChristophefToad _neighborhood is ,going to rally against that. He
apologized for taking a personal viewaoint of tb`s. He exprossed he is slating a resident's position. He
stated there are four houses in the area Commissioner Hasek is speaking about. One of the property
owners has raised chicken and goats; they think they live in a rural area.
Councilmember Turgeon recommended against extending the study area any further to the west.
Commissioner Hasek stated that when the Planning Commission discussed the study area it noted the
parking requirements for parking are approximately three times as great as those for senior housing. The
Commission thought that having a higher density use with lower traffic needs would be better for the
area. The Commission thought traffic will be an issue there.
Councilmember Zerby asked if the Comp Plan doesn't say something about reducing traffic on County
Club Road. Director Nielsen explained that the traffic counts actually came down some from what they
were prior to CUB Foods being developed near Lake Linden Drive. Commissioner Vilett said the
Commission discussed getting more traffic into the mixed use area.
Commissioner Ruoff stated if the study area is developed on a piecemeal basis who knows what will
happen to traffic counts. By encouraging a unified development of the area there will at least be some
control. He related that during the last Planning Commission meeting Director Nielsen had stated one
vision for the northwest quadrant could include a common area for the businesses. It would improve the
aesthetics of the area.
JOINT CITY COUNCIL AND PLANNNING COMMISSION MEETING
May 4, 2010
Page 6 of 7
Councilmember Zerby stated he is all for making the area look better. There are definite issues with the
how the northwest quadrant looks. He expressed what gets him concerned is three -story high - density
buildings, tearing down houses, and encroaching toward Christopher Load.
Administrator Heck stated if the City wants to reduce the gap between vacancy and non- vacancy in that
area the higher density has to be allowed.
Mayor Lizee stated the City has to be open to different options.
Planning Commission Chair Geng stated the Planning Commission didn't foresee the area being
redeveloped any time soon. But, the Commission concurred with Director Nielsen that the City has to
have some vision for how it would like the study area to be redeveloped prior the economy taking a turn
upward.
Mayor Lizee agreed the City should be proactive rather than reactive.
Commissioner Vilett clarified that the Planning Commission's intent is to get a dialogue going with
property owners and developers. It has no intent to force this on any one. The pros and cons of different
approaches should be discussed.
Commissioner Ruoff stated it's critical that the Commission emphasize the purpose is to get a discussion
going and clarify the City does not have a set direction at this time.
Commissioner Hasek asked if Council :had and <reac6on lq the vision statement.
Mayor Lizee suggested that when the C�ommissiou =the property owners and developers it will
be important to let them know the Commission has some ideas and also that there are issues with some of
the properties. She thought the others would be more open to sharing their ideas knowing that. She
expressed her appreciation for the Commission moving forward on this.
Commissioner Hutchins stated it's critical that the property owners understand the City doesn't anticipate
the areas being redeveloped anytime soon. He commented that there are 110 condo developments in
various stages of completion at this time in the metropolitan area. He thought financing any type of
development at this time is going to be difficult to get.
Mayor Lizee stated if Councilmembers have comments about the remainder of the Plamling
Commission's work program she asked them to provide their comments to Director Nielsen.
Mayor Lizee stated the work program indicates the Planning Commission will discuss sustainability in
December 2010 and again in 2011. She indicated she did not think sustainability had been defined well
as of yet. She then stated there were three great editorials in the May 2, 2010, Star Tribune Opinion
Exchange section. Her favorite was the editorial about energy innovation written by Bill Gates and Chad
Holliday. The authors talked how innovation in not political. She then stated there are a lot of great ideas
about sustainability. She complemented the Commission for wanting to look at the big picture. She
thought it was up to the Council, with the help of the Planning Commission, to provide leadership on
how to go about affecting change locally. She indicated she thought everyone on the Council and the
Planning Commission had a lot of good ideas and she thought that collectively they could pull them
together.
JOINT CITY COUNCIL AND PLANNING COMMISSION MEE
May 4, 2010
Page 7 of 7
3. OTHER BUSINESS
There was no other business for discussion.
4. ADJOURN
Zerby moved, Woodruff seconded, adjourning the Joint City Council and Planning Commission
meeting at 6:58 P.M. Motion passed 10/00
HIM
Christine Freeman, Recorder
Christine Liz6e, Mayor
Brian Heck, City Administrator/Clerk
F #2BI
MINUTES
1. CONVENE JOINT CITY COUNCIL AND PARK COMMISSION MEE'T'ING
Mayor Lizee convened the Joint Meeting at 6:00 p.m.
A. Roll Call
Present: Mayor Lizee; Councilmembers Bailey, Turgeon, Woodruff and Zerby; Administrator
Heck; and Planning Director Brown
Park Commission Chair Norman; Park Commissioners Edmondson, Gaidos, Quinlan,
and Robb; and Park Coordinator Anderson
Absent: Park Commissioner Trent
Mayor Lizee welcomed the Park Commissioners. She turned control of the meeting over to Park
Commission Chair Norman and Park Coordinator Anderson.
A. Capital Improvement Program
Park Commission Chair Norman stated the Park Commission has been working on a 5 -year capital
improvement program (CIP) for the City's parks for the last 8 — 9 months. The CIP is relatively
aggressive for 2010 and 2011. The largest project in the 2010 CEP is the refurbishment to the Manor Park
shelter, which is primarily being done in order to be able to offer additional programs provided by
Minnetonka Community Education. The refurbished shelter should also help make Manor Park the
anchor park in the east end of the City.
Nonnan highlighted other projects planned for 2010 which include: Silverwood Park — bituminous
parking lot; Silverwood Park — picnic shelter canopy; signs for the tennis courts; Badger Park — resurface
tennis court; tot lot equipment for all the parks; and Skate Park — add a drinking fountain, install a
community garden sign and fence, and rehabilitate the Skate Park.
Norman then highlighted the projects planned for 2011, which include: installing signage in all parks and
entry points into the City; Cathcart Park — replace hockey rink lights, replace the rink boards, and replace
the swing set; and, Freeman Park — re -roof the picnic shelter and build an open skate rink.
Councilmember Woodruff stated reduction in estimates for the Silverwood Park picnic shelter canopy
and the Manor Park amour °t6 ipproxfimat6l $43,00,(3 ,Add TIF proceeds to that and
there is another approximately $50,000 available in 2010 for parks
Councilmember Turgeon stated (`ou it has deotded not,to have the City install a fence around the
community garden; therefore, the entire $5,200 will not be used. She then stated she assumed the open
skate rink proposed for Freeman Park does not include lighting base on a cost estimate of $50,000. She
asked the Park Commission what its vision is for the open rink. Park Commission Chair Norman
explained that many years ago residents near Freeman Park expressed their reluctance to having lighting
in that Park. He also explained that $50,000 was just a placeholder for the rink.
Director Brown explained based on the condition of the lights in Cathcart Park he thought something will
have to be done with the lights in 2010. They will have to be replaced or taken down because they are a
safety hazard. He stated he would not be able to confirm that until someone did a close -up assessment.
Councilmember Bailey suggested consideration be given to making an investment in lights for Freeman
Park and make the proposed open rink a nighttime rink. Cathcart Park could then become a daytime only
rink. Park Commission Chair Norman stated in Freeman Park there is a facility that can accommodate
skating. The proposed rink will have to be located in the appropriate place. The Park Commission has
identified potential locations in the northeast corner of the park.
Mayor Lizee stated Cathcart Park has been around a long time and the rink is very important to the
Minnetonka Youth Hockey Association. She thought it would be important to speak with the Association
to hear any concerns it may have. She recommended the City look for partnerships with the City of
Chanhassen for improvements to this Park because the Park is located in Chanhassen. She expressed she
was leery of making a significant financial investment in Cathcart Park if Chanhassen is not willing to be
a partner. The Association should also be asked to partner on any improvements. She stated she thought
,JOINT CITY COUNCIL AND PARK COMMISSION MEETING
May 10, 2010
Page 3 of 5
it necessary to have lights for the proposed rink in Freeman Park because it gets dark by 4:30 P.M. during
the winter. She indicated she thought the 2011 CIP is very tentative with regard to Cathcart Park.
Councilmember Woodruff asked Director Brown if it would be possible to build an open rink with lights
in Freeman Park in 2010. The sports team could then use that rink and the rink in Cathcart Park could
become a daytime only rink. Brown stated the challenge in Freeman Park is the ground. Brown noted that
there is sanitary sewer and watennain installed in Freeman Park and there is a small drainage ditch.
Brown stated at this point in time he thought it could be doable. Woodruff stated the $50,000 in the CIP
for Cathcart Park Lighting could go toward lighting in Freeman Park.
Councilmember Turgeon stated girls softball leagues appear to be using the softball fields at Freeman
Park less because they are using fields at the high school. She questioned if one of the softball fields at
the Park could be converted to a different use. She then stated Chanhassen has already indicated it did
not intend to make a capital investment into Cathcart Park.
Park Coordinator Anderson stated the Hockey Association had previously asked to do a refrigerated ice
rink venture with the City at Freeman Park. When that was being reviewed, the Park Commission did
identify locations for ice rink.
Councilmember Woodruff commented that a new ice rink may be a great opportunity for a grant
application. He suggested the Park Conunission add a line item into the CIP for replacement of trees lost
to Emerald Ash Borer. He clarified he was not necessarily advocating for replacing diseased trees in the
woods, only those that are ,1n6i; , NJsibf `arnd providq`�.ihade. Pal " onrirr tss crri Chair Norman explained
that the Three Rivers Park' District i considermg= iml?lementm ,a pro t'am where it will replace 10
percent of the Ash trees ht its parks each °earoun�lme�mtier ` Turgeon commented there are other
varieties of trees that are susceptible' to disease that bus also be dealt with. Park Commissioner
-
Edmondson asked if the City has a particular tree removal company it does business with, and if so
maybe it has a certified arborist on its staff that would look at the City's trees for free. Administrator
Heck stated the City is going to train staff on how to identify diseased trees. Woodruff stated the removal
of trees could be funded for out of the Parks Operating Budget and the replacement trees could be funded
out of the Parks CIP. Councilmember Zerby stated the City should adhere to its tree preservation and
reforestation policy.
Councilmember Zerby asked what, if any discussion, the Park Commission has had about connecting the
sidewalk at the Tonka Village Shopping Center to the LRT Trail. Director Brown explained there is
approximately 400 feet between the City's pedestrian /bicycle facilities and the LRT Trail. That was
discussed in the County Road 19 Corridor Study. Councilmember Turgeon stated there is only 400 feet in
the City but the extension would be longer than that. She thought the connection should be made. Zerby
stated he thought it would be worthwhile to be able to get from Badger Park to the LRT Trail behind the
public safety facility and from the Center to the LRT Trail. Councilmember Woodruff stated he thought
that would be a worthwhile thing to do. Zerby stated he wanted this item to be included in the Parks CIP.
Park Commission Chair Norman asked if the Council was in alignment with the Park Commission on the
CIP projects for 2010 and 2011. Councilmember Bailey stated he was very comfortable with them and he
expressed he thought the Commission did a great job developing the CIP. Councilmember Woodruff
stated he likes the CIP for 2010 and 2011. Woodruff suggested the Commission include more projects
than it thinks it can get funding for in the CIP if they are projects it thinks are worthwhile. The
Commission should push Council on additional funding provided it is not for outrageous projects.
Norman stated the Commission could identify different CIP options. Mayor Lizee stated she thought
JOINT CITY COUNCIL AND PARK COMMISSION MEETING
May 10, 2010
Tugs 4 of
Mayor L,iz &e suggested the conversation move to the discussion of how to apply for grants.
Administrator Fleck explained how the grant application process works in most instances. The first thing
the City has to do is send a letter of intent that outlines the project in general. It also identifies the
estimated cost and the amount of matching funds that may be required for the project. He noted the City
is not obligated at this time to do the project or to do it exactly the way it is described in the letter of
intent. Council is generally asked to support the submittal of the grant application. As the process, moves
along a comprehensive outline and budget are developed for the grant. He stated it's his understanding
that the Park Commission has indicated that if there is a project in the Parks CIP and Staff deterinines
grant opportunities are available for the project the Commission supports Staff submitting a letter of
intent without having to bring it before the Commission. Park Commission Chair Norman stated Heck's
understanding is correct.
Councilmember Woodruff.s'uggesled a giant app11cat on be siiibmitt d even -if the project is scheduled to
be done in a future year.
C C
Administrator Heck stated iif . he, grant` require . an 'in-kind contribution from the City that may not be in
the budget Council would be asked for its support before the letter of intent is submitted. The City
already has personnel who have responsibility for submitting grant applications. He recommended Staff
have the flexibility to submit letters of intent for projects already being considered. The period of time
from when Staff learns about a grant opportunity to when an application has to be submitted is most
frequently relatively short. When an opportunity comes up for a large project but that project is not in
any CIP then that needs to be presented to the Park Commission and Council first.
Councilmember Turgeon stated from her vantage point the long -term maintenance costs and ongoing
staff are often not identified up front. She recommended those costs be identified up front.
Councilmember Woodruff stated he shared Turgeon's concern. Woodruff suggested the Park
Commission review the projects in the Parks CIP to determine if the long -term maintenance costs and
added personnel costs have been considered. He commented he thought there would be a grant
opportunity for the Skate Park shelter project included in the 2013 Parks CIP, noting this project would
generate a new maintenance requirement.
Park Commissioner Edmondson stated he finds it beneficial to have Director Brown in attendance at Park
Commission meetings when projects are discussed because Brown can explain what the maintenance
costs will be. Park Coordinator Anderson stated she discusses those types of needs with Brown. Park
Commission Chair Norman stated the Park Commission considers the use of lower maintenance
materials for projects. Park Commmissioner Robb reinforced Norman's comments.
Park Commissioner Edmondson asked if the City could use an intern to help process grant applications.
Administrator Heck stated the City has two people on staff responsible for doing that.
JOINT CITY COUNCIL ND PARK COMMISSION MEETING
May 10, 2010
Page 5 of 5
Adhaistratar Aleck stated the City napes to hear about the status of its grant application through the
Hennepin County Youth Sports Grant program in late May. The City is waiting for feedback on other
grant applications submitted. He commented February is a good time to approach foundations about
potential grants.
Mayor Lizee complimented Staff on the good jab it has done in applying for grants. She suggested
Council support applying for the grants when opportunities arise, noting applying for the grants does not
commit the City to spending funds or doing the project in a certain way. It does put the City in a pool of
applicants for consideration.
Woodruff moved, Turgeon seconded, adjourning the Joint City Council and Parr Commission
meeting at 6:52 P.M. Motion passed 10/0.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED
Christine Freeman, Recorder
�:.,
_J
CITE' OF SHOREWOOD
CITE' COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
MONDAY, MAY 10, 2010
Mayor Lizee called the meeting to order at 7 :01 P.M.
.., aI,:
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
7 :00 P.M.
Present. Mayor Lizee; Councilmembers Bailey, Turgeon, Woodruff and Zerby; Attorney Tietjen;
City Administrator Heck; Planning Director Nielsen; Director of Public Works Brown;
and Engineer Landim
Absent: None.
B. Review Agenda
Turgeon moved, Zerby seconded, approving the agenda as presented.
Director Nielsen requested It�n 8.A ;be r moved from the geT so ,hp .aid Attorney Tietjen could
discuss the item further.
Without objection from the seconder, the; maher of the .nnotion accepted the amendment to the
agenda. Motion passed 5/0'. ..'~
2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. City Council Work Session Minutes, April 19, 2010
Turgeon moved, Bailey seconded, Approving the City Council Work Session Minutes of April 19,
2010, as presented. Motion passed 510.
B. City Council Work Session Minutes, April 26, 2010
Bailey moved, Woodruff seconded, Approving the City Council Work Session Minutes of April 26,
2010, as presented. Motion passed 510.
C. City Council Regular Meeting Minutes, April 26, 2010
Zerby moved, Woodruff seconded, Approving the City Council Regular Meeting Minutes of April
26, 2010, as presented. Motion passed 5/0.
3. CONSENT AGENDA
Mayor Lizee reviewed the items on the Consent Agenda.
CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
May 10, 2010
Page 2 of
Turgeon moved, Zerhy seconded, Approving the Motions Contained on the Consent Agenda and
Adopting the Resolutions Therein.
A. Approval of the Verified Claims List
B. Personal Action Recruitment p Operator
.
Motion passed 5/0.
• ••"
There were no matters from the floor presented this evening.
5. PUBLIC HEARING....
ZZ
None.
6. REPORTS AND PRE I NTATIONS
None.
7. PARKS
No report was given because there had not been a Park Commission meeting since the last City Council
regular meeting. A meeting is scheduled for May 11, 2010.
8. PLANNING
No report was given.
A. Ordinance Amending Chapter 1201.03 of the City Code Relating to Campaign Signs
This item was removed from the agenda at Director Nielsen's request.
9. ENGINEERING /PUBLIC WORKS
A. Accept Quote for Purchase of Seal Coat Rock, City Program 10 -07
Engineer Landini stated the City's 2010 Operating Budget for sealcoating of roadways is $214,000. The
City obtained quotes for the sealcoat aggregate for this effort. The lowest quote received was from Martin
CITY OIL SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEE MINUTE`,
May 10, 2010
Page 3 of
Marietta Materials, Inc. located in St. Cloud, Milmesota, for a total of $30,800 plus tax. Staff recommends
Council authorize Staff to purchase the aggregate.
Turgeon moved, Woodruff seconded, authorizing Staff to purchase sealcoat aggregate for the 2010
Sealcoat Project from Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. in the amount of $30,800 plus tax.
Councilmember Zerby stated the other quote the City received was from Dresser Trap Rock, Inc. for an
amount of $54,460 plus tax. He asked Engineer Landini why there was such a discrepancy. Landini stated
Dresser Trap Rock is located in Dresser, Wisconsin, and transportation costs could be the reason for the
difference in cost.
Overlay, B. Approve Plans and Specifications and Authorize Advertisement for Bids for 2010
Mill and i
Engineer Landini stated the meeting packet for this meeting contains the plans and specifications for the
mill and overlay of streets in 2010. The streets chosen for 2010 are Yellowstone Trail and Eureka Road.
They have a PASER rating of 4 or higher. Staff recommends Council approve the plans and specifications
and authorize advertisement for bids.
A. Milfoil Treatment Invoice
Administrator Heck explained that Councilmember Turgeon requested the invoice from the Lake
Minnetonka Association (LMA) for the 2010 treatment of aquatic invasive species (AIS) in Phelps Bay
be placed on the agenda as a separate item. He noted Council had budgeted and reaffirmed the use of
$6,000 for this effort. He stated he had asked the Dick Osgood, the Executive Director of the LMA, to
provide him with the amounts the Department of Natural Resources (DNR), the Lake Minnetonka
Conservation District (LMCD), the Cities of Minnetrista and Mound, and the residents of Phelps Bay
contributed toward the 2010 treatment. The invoice to the LMA indicates the cost to physically treat
Phelps Bay for Eurasian Watermilfoil (Milfoil) was $18,535.40 and the cost to treat the Bay for Curly
Leaf Pondweed was $9,745 for a total of $28,280.40. It is his understanding that the DNR contributed
$25,000 for the treatment of Canaan Bay, Gray's Bay, and Phelps Bay and the fields were equally split ;
the amount toward the treatment of Phelps Bay was a little more than $8,000. Mr. Osgood indicated the
LMCD contributed $7,070.10 (of 25 percent of the treatment cost) out of its Save - the - Lake -Fund to this
effort. Mr. Osgood explained that there is a separate pool of money for the treatment of each of the three
bays.
Councilmember Woodruff stated he will recuse himself from this discussion and any subsequent vote. He
then stated because he is the City's elected official representative to the LMCD he would be willing to
entertain questions from that position. Mayor Lizee stated she appreciated Woodruff's desire to recuse
himself but she didn't think that was necessary. Woodruff stated he owns one of 29 residential properties
located in the City that front Phelps Bay.
Cffy OF S14OREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MELTING MINUTES
May 10, 2010
Page 4 of 6
Councilmember Turgeon stated the reason she wanted this to be a separate agenda item was she wanted to
make sure Council had the specific information about this project. The resolution for this treatment
specifically stated the City's contribution only be used to treat Shorewood waters. She then stated the
2010 cost is slightly more than $28,000 and that amount is approximately one -third of the cost of the
2009 treatment yet the amount of the City's contribution ($6,000) isn't changing. The City contributed
$6,000 toward the 2008 and 2009 treatment efforts. The City of Mound budgeted $10,000 for the
treatment; she was not sure if that is actually what it contributed. The City of Minnetrista budgeted
$3,000; she was not sure of what its contribution was. The DNR has committed approximately $8,300
toward the 2010 treatment. Based on the contributions from the other agencies and other cities it appeared
to her that the LMA was collecting more money for the 2010 treatment than the treatment cost. She stated
in 2008 and 2009 the Shorewood property owners on Phelps Bay also contributed toward the treatment,
noting Council has not been provided with information on their total contribution for 2010. She suggested
Council re- evaluate what the 2010 contribution should actually be. She stated it's her understanding that
the treatments are killing off native plant species, and that there is more Curly Leaf Pondweed because of
the reduction in Milfoil. She commented that just because the City budgeted $6,000 to use toward the
treatment it doesn't have to contribute that amount. She indicated she would entertain a different amount
or would like to continue this item to a future meeting pending receipt of more information.
Mayor Lizee stated the City committed to a five -year project and to making a contribution toward the
treatment. She then stated Council has received a great deal of information from the LMA, the LMCD
and the DNR regarding how the treatments have been working. The 2010 treatments that have been done
to date in Phelps Bay may have cost less because of the DNR's requirement to do the treatment earlier
than it was done in 2008 and 2009. The areas identified in 2009 for treatment in 2010 did not necessarily
end up being the only areas that needed treafthent. She' expressed she did riot want to micro manage this
effort, and she recommended the City follQwF.ihroug i with itse conunitzment to the LMA and LMCD. She
stated Lake Minnetonka is one large'body ofwater hat'all.of the City's residents can use.
Councilmember Turgeon stated that from her vantage point, the City did not commit to five years, nor did
it commit to a $6,000 contribution each year.
Councilmember Bailey asked what the City's property owners are contributing to the 2010 treatment
effort.
Mayor Liz6e stated according to the council action form for this item, Staff is recommending Council
approve and authorize reimbursement for the treatment costs of Phelps Bay as provided in the 2010
budget. She asked Administrator Heck to explain why that recommendation was made. Heck explained
because it is in line with Council's action back when the Gideon Bay residents came before Council to
discuss expanding the treatment program to Gideon Bay. Council had indicated that the dollars budgeted
for AIS treatment are to be used for the waters within the City.
Administrator Heck explained that according to a response from Mr. Osgood, unspent treatment funds are
carried forward to the next year for treatment. Mr. Osgood had also clarified that the invoice is for the
actual treatment cost only and that there are other costs associated with the treatments. Heck questioned
what amount was carried forward to 2010. He stated it's his recollection that Council wanted the $6,000
to go toward the treatment of waters within Shorewood; it could go toward Phelps Bay or Gideon Bay
had Gideon Bay been approved for treatment by the DNR.
Councilmember Bailey stated he was uncomfortable authorizing this payment at this time due to the lack
of clarity. The resolution had said it was to treat the waters within Shorewood. He thought the Council
CITY OF StttRWt3� t;tULR ('OJT �'t IL MIS 1t�It7T
May 10, 2010
Page 5 of 6
should stick with that unless Council wants to change the resolution. He expressed he would like to have
more information on total costs for Phelps Bay and total projected contributions.
Councilmember Zerby asked Councilmember Woodruff if he, as an owner with property that fronts
Phelps Bay, had been approached for funding and if so how much was he asked to contribute. Woodruff
stated that he had seen a list a while ago which showed what the Shorewood property owners' had
pledged as well as those individuals who had made no decisions. He noted he did not know how much
had been collected from the residents.
L B ailey sec onded , this em to the May 24, 2010, City Council me and
asking that Lake Minnetonka Association Executive Director Osgood and the Enchanted Island
resi b as k e d to attend.
Councilmember Turgeon stated she wanted to be provided with all of the funding information and
treatment costs, as well as what happens to unspent money.
Motion passed 4/0/1 with Woodruff recusing.
1 • •',
A. Administrator and Staff
Administrator Heck stated
12 and there is a Minneh
I�
lion scheduled for May
scheduled for May 14"'.
Director Brown stated Smithtown Ean0 has been r& afmcd and crews are working on the other details of
the project. He explained utl�ities have been removed andeth utility poleis gone, and the cul -de -sac is
being constructed. Utility crews are in the process of relocating gas services and power poles are being
relocated in the Wild Rose Lane area. The utility crews were authorized to start early so they could be
done before the contractor brings in its heavy equipment.
Director Nielsen stated the firm the MCWD had hired to do landscaping maintenance at Gideon Glen had
conducted a controlled burn of the site. This is year two of a three — four year effort to try and improve
the grasses. The firin believed burning the area was the most effective way to improve the area.
Councilmember Turgeon stated the residents had not been informed of the burn in advance. Nielsen stated
he would check into who was notified.
Waterford Pond Maintenance Proposal
Engineer Landini stated the meeting packet for this meeting contains a report on the Waterford Pond
Outlot A. Council is being asked to accept the Waterford Pond Outlot A Maintenance Report.
Administrator Heck stated this report is to inform Council that this work must be performed.
Woodruff moved, Turgeon seconded, accepting the Waterford Pond Outlot A Maintenance Report.
Motion passed 5/0.
B. Mayor and City Council
Councilmember Woodruff stated the Lake Minnetonka Communications Commission is working on a
project related to fiber to the premise. The name for the enterprise is Tonkaconnect and its website is
CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL, MEETING MINUTES
May 10, 2010
Page 6of6
www.tonkaconnect.co , A workshop has been scheduled for Saturday June 5 at Westonka High School
primarily for the benefit of the LMCC °s member cites councils, school boards, public safety officials and
other officials to educate them on what this project is about.
Mayor L,izee stated there was a meeting of the SL,MPD Coordinating Committee on May 5 t1i She
provided a brief update of what was discussed during the meeting. She noted there had been a budget
work session scheduled for that same evening but it was postponed.
• .,
Turgeon moved, Zerby seconded, Adjourning the City Council Regular Meeting of May 10. 2010,
at 7:40 P.M. Motion passed 5/0.
Brian Heck, City Administrator /Clerk
COUNCIL ACTION FORM
Claims for council authorization. The attached claims list includes checks numbered 49978 through
50053 totaling $219,726.32.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of the claims list.
5/20 /2010
.1.16 DIM
11/
HT-STORY" CHECK REPORT
VEND
'C' qty o - _holewood
12,410.49
000000
BANK!
= BEACON BANK
049978
1,445.81
D -iH RANGTv .
5/ - /2010 THRU 99/99/9999
049980
6,723.75
049982
1,056.83
CHECK
VENDOR -.D.
NAME
049984
STATUS
DATE
00051
EFTPS - FEDERAL W/H
D
5/11/2010
00092
MN DEPT OF REVENUE
5.93
D
5/11/2010
00053
ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST- 302131 -4
R
5/11/2010
16625
MINN NCPERS GROUP LIFE INS
869.50
R
5/11/2010
00052
PERA
049992
R
5/11/2010
20005
WELLS FARGO HEALTH BENEFIT
SVC
R
5/11/2010
00550
A -1 MINNETONKA RENTAL
53.44
R
5/24/2010
00700
ABDO, EICK & MEYERS, LLP
049997
R
5/24/2010
10576
ADVANCED IMAGING SOLUTIONS
INC
R
5/24/2010
29327
AIR COMPRESSORS PLUS L.L.C.
R
5/24/2010
01300
ALBINSON REPROGRAPHICS
R
5/24/2010
01977
ANDERSON, KRISTI B.
R
5/24/2010
15485
ATHLETIC METRO SUPPLY
R
5/24/2010
03230
HIPPS, INC.
R
5/24/2010
29315
BOLTON & MENK, INC.
R
5/24/2010
04081
CARQUEST AUTO PARTS
R
5/24/2010
05050
CITIES DIGITAL INC.
R
5/24/2010
07600
CITY OF EXCELSIOR
R
5/24/2010
05056
CLAREY'S SAFETY EQUIPMENT,
INC
R
5/24/2010
05305
COMMUNITY REC RESOURCES
R
5/24/2010
05345
CONNEY SAFETY PRODUCTS
R
5/24/2010
05885
CULLIGAN BOTTLED WATER
R
5/24/2010
IKVOICE
AMOUNT DISCOUNT
PAC-
!
CHECK
CHECI{ CHECK
NO
STATUS AMOUNT
000000
12,410.49
000000
2,063.11
049978
1,445.81
049979
32.00
049980
6,723.75
049982
1,056.83
049983
16.04
049984
15,100.00
049985
14,689.66
049986
202.35
049987
5.93
049988
359.00
049989
723.33
049990
869.50
049991
1,928.50
049992
112.05
049993
1,690.00
049994
7,535.71
049995
53.44
049996
2,535.00
049997
191.39
049998
88.39
1 2 6 1 1M 7/1 HI 'r L _. i C'1) R- _-PORT ?AC_.
BAN D1,1 BAN
DATE, RANGE _ 1, /99/ '99
-i /� 1/� )� � in_RL 3
INVOICE;
AMOUNT DISCOUNT
CHECK.
CHECK CHECK
CHECK
NAME
STATUS
DATE
DELANO RENTAL, INC.
R
5/24/2010
DELEGARD TOOL CO
R
5/24/2010
EMERGENCY AUTOMOTIVE TECHNOLOG
R
5/24/2010
FASCHING, PATRICIA
R
5/24/2010
FERGUSON WATERWORKS
R
5/24/2010
FORUM COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY D
R
5/24/2010
G & K SERVICES
R
5/24/2010
GOPHER SIGN COMPANY
R
5/24/2010
GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL, TN
R
5/24/2010
GRAINGER, INC
R
5/24/2010
GROUT, TWILA
R
5/24/2010
HANCE UTILITY SERVICES, INC.
R
5/24/2010
HANSEN THORP PELLINEN OLSON, I
R
5/24/2010
HAWKINS, INC.
R
5/24/2010
HD SUPPLY WATERWORKS, LTD.
R
5/24/2010
HENN CTY INFO TECHNOLOGY DEPT
R
5/24/2010
ICS - HEALY -RUFF
R
5/24/2010
INTEGRATED FIRE & SECURITY
R
5/24/2010
J. BECHER & ASSOC., INC.
R
5/24/2010
JESSICA BLUM
R
5/24/2010
LOCAL LINK
R
5/24/2010
LOCATORS & SUPPLIES INC
R
5/24/2010
INVOICE;
AMOUNT DISCOUNT
CHECK.
CHECK CHECK
NO
STATUS AMOUNT
049999
126.59
050000
199.81
050001
93.31
050002
11.50
050003
3,491.63
050004
283.96
050005
938.01
050006
95.12
050007
297.55
050008
76.28
050009
22.70
050010
133.75
050011
2,948.25
050012
70.00
050013
83.60
050014
64.00
050015
493.70
050016
320.66
050017
535.44
050018
30.00
050019
131.80
050020
443.41
5./20/20 " -!'
-c ?T✓ 2 .f1
';'S CORY
CITECK DEPORT
EN710 ET:
0 Ci t o` S-otewood
BAN C:
- BEACON DANK
DATE RANGE:
5/11/2010 I1IRU 99/99/999')
CHECK
VENDOR I.D.
NAME
.STATUS
DATE
MARY DOWNING
R
5/24/2010
15050
MEDIACOM
R
5/24/2010
15501
METRO COUNCIL ENV.(SAC)
R
5/24/2010
15300
METRO SALES, INC.
R
5/24/2010
23727
MIDWEST TRENCHLESS TECHNOLOGIE
R
5/24/2010
06645
MN DEPT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY
R
5/24/2010
29326
NATIONAL UTILITIES CO.
R
5/24/2010
19960
NORTHLAND CHEMICAL CORP.
R
5/24/2010
19965
NORTHLAND TRUST SERVICES, INC.
R
5/24/2010
15900
OFFICE DEPOT
R
5/24/2010
20500
PETTY CASH
R
5/24/2010
20805
PITNEY BOWES CREDIT CORP
R
5/24/2010
20950
POTTS, KENNETH N.
R
5/24/2010
21450
QUALITY FLOW SYSTEMS, INC
R
5/24/2010
26100
QWEST
R
5/24/2010
22450
SAFETY -KLEEN SYSTEMS, INC.
R
5/24/2010
83501
SCHWAAB, INC
R
5/24/2010
22950
SHOREWOOD TRUE VALUE
R
5/24/2010
22980
SIGN LLC
R
5/24/2010
22585
SOUTHSHORE SENIOR PARTNERS
R
5/24/2010
19435
SPRINT
R
5/24/2010
29101
SUN NEWSPAPERS
R
5/24/2010
PAGE:
INVOICE CHECK CHECK CHECK
AMOUNT DISCOUNT NO STATUS AMOUNT
050021 30 -00
050022 47.95
050023 2,079.00
050024 654.00
050025 12,415.34
050026 '70.00
050027 205.20
050028 61.35
050029 53,007.50
050030 244.65
050031 300.00
050032 29.00
050033 701.25
050034 652.60
050035 693.03
050036 399.80
050037 95.43
050038 199.63
050040 170.16
050041 54.00
050042 187.45
050043 291.37
T C C - F -0'.P' IAGE. -
5 /2D /2010 _� =: -,M G/ 41 , ORY C _ ,. -�
VEN `R SET: 01 11.7 ot -Y orEwood.
-ANR: 1. DEACON RANK
DATE RANGE: 5/,.1,!2010 T 99/99/9999
CHECK
INVOICE
CHECK
CHECK CHECK
VENDOR I.D.
NAME STATUS
DATE
AMOUNT
DISCOUNT NO
STATUS AMOUNT.
17200
SUN PATRIOT NEWSPAPERS
R
5/24/2010
050044
66.89
23726
TKDA ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS PLAN
R
5/24/2010
050045
2,529.91
24900
TONKA UNITED SOCCER ASSN
R
5/24/2010
050046
8,320.00
25452
TWIN CITY WATER CLINIC
R
5/24/2010
050047
100.00
29328
ULTEIG
R
5/24/2010
050048
750.00
25540
UNITED LABORATORIES
R
5/24/2010
050049
748.36
25700
UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA
R
5/24/2010
050050
255.00
27190
WACONIA FARM SUPPLY
R
5/24/2010
050051
309.93
28451
WSB AND ASSOCIATES
R
5/24/2010
050052
301.00
29050
ZERBY, MICHAEL S.
R
5/24/2010
050053
158.08
* * T 0 T A L S * *
NO
CHECK AMOUNT
DISCOUNTS
TOTAL APPLIED
REGULAR CHECKS:
74
152,377.63
0.00
152,377.63
HAND CHECKS:
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
DRAFTS:
2
14,473.60
0.00
14,473.60
EFT:
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
NON CHECKS:
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
VOID CHECKS:
0 VOID DEBITS
0.00
VOID CREDITS
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
TOTAL ERRORS: 0
VENDOR SET: 01 BANK:
1 TOTALS: 76
166,851.23
0.00
166,851.23
BANK: 1 TOTALS:
76
166,851.23
0.00
166,851.23
REPORT TOTALS:
78
166,851.23
0.00
166,851.23
C' '; J \ .. - A'_?.^, : {: 1' :3 `J VENDOR -
MAY _24� 20 10
PAG':
I
VENDOR SORT KEY
DAT �1 Sc �IP r ors
— U ND
�, FA!RIM"N"
_ _
AMOUN"
-
A-1 . raTNNETON:cA RENTAL
5/24/10 SOD CUTTER. PARKS
General Fund
rks Recre�t lo° �
'a & _..._
TOTAL:
116. '_ --
16.04
ABDO, SICK & MEYERS, LLP
5 /24/10 2009 AUDIT SVCS
5/24/10 2009 AUDIT SVCS
General Fund
Water Utility
Professional. Svcs
Water
10,600.00
2,250.00
5/24/10 2009 AUDIT SVCS
Sanitary Sewer Uti
Sewer
2,
TOTAL:
15,100.00
ADVANCED IMAGING SOLUTIONS INC
5/24/10 MAINE SVC 05/15 -06/15
General Fund
Municipal Buildings
67.00
5/24/10 CMY90G COPIER
General Fund
Municipal Buildings
13,493.05
5/24/10 BOOKLET FINISHER - COPIER
General Fund
Municipal Buildings
1,129
TOTAL:
14,689.66
AIR COMPRESSORS PLUS L.L.C.
5/24/10 AIR COMPRESSOR PARTS
General Fund
Public Works
TOTAL:
202.35
202.35
ALBINSON REPROGRAPHICS
5/24/10 DIGITAL BOND PRINTS
General Fund
City Engineer
TOTAL:
5
5.93
ANDERSON, KRISTI B.
5/24/10 PARK COMMISSION MTG 05/11/
5/24/10 SSCC -RENEW WEBSITE DOMAIN
General Fund
Southshore Communi
Parks & Recreation
Senior Community Cente
260.00
99.00
TOTAL:
359.00
ATHLETIC METRO SUPPLY
5/24/10 BASES & HARDWARE PARKS
General Fund
Parks & Recreation
TOTAL:
723.33
723.33
BIFFS, INC.
5/24/10 MAY SVC
General Fund
Parks & Recreation
TOTAL:
869.50
869.50
BOLTON & MENK, INC.
5/24/10 OVERLAY PROJECT
5/24/10 MISC ENG /SURVEY
Street Capital
Stormwater Managem
Imp Street Capt Improvemen
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT
1,437.00
491.50
TOTAL:
1,928.50
CARQUEST AUTO PARTS
5/24/10 OIL FILTERS
5/24/10 HITCH BALL & ADAPTER
General Fund
General Fund
Public Works
Public Works
18.60
35.29
5/24/10 AIR REGULATOR
Water Utility
Water
58. 16
TOTAL:
112.05
CITIES DIGITAL INC.
5/24/10 LASERFICHE SUPPORT & UPDA General Fund
Municipal Buildings _
TOTAL:
1
1,690.00
CITY OF EXCELSIOR
5/24/10 NOV 2009 -FED 2010 TRAFFIC
5/24/10 1ST QTR SEWER JOIN
General Fund
Sanitary Sewer
Traffic Control /Str Li
Uti Sewer
50.42
7,485.2
TOTAL:
7,535.71
CLAREY'S SAFETY EQUIPMENT, INC
5/24/10 4 LEVEL GAS MONITOR CALIBR Sanitary Sewer
Uti Sewer
53.44
TOTAL:
53.44
COMMUNITY REC RESOURCES
5/24/10 PARK COORDINATOR SVC 5/10- General Fund
5/24/10 SSCC ASSISTANT- 05/10 - 05/ 20 Southshore Communi
Parks & Recreation
Senior Community Cente
2,295.00
240.00
TOTAL:
2,535.00
CONNEY SAFETY PRODUCTS
5/24/10 GEN. SUPPLIES
Sanitary Sewer
Uti Sewer
191.39
TOTAL:
191.39
CULLIGAN BOTTLED WATER
5/24/10 DRINKING WATER SVC
General Fund
Municipal Buildings
88.39
�.: . -201`0 2 Air
VENDOR SORT KEY
DELANO RENTAL, INC.
DELEGARD TOOL CO
EFTPS - FEDERAL W/H
EMERGENCY AUTOMOTIVE TECHNOLOGIES, INC 5/24/10 WARNING LIGHTS
J J N 17 _ 1 1 REPORT 3_ v N/ - MAY 24, 2010
TOTAL: 88.39
PAGT' . 2
DATE DES ,RIPS 7ON F:,�T ) DE PARTMENT iMOUN
5/24_/ TILLER RENTAL COMM GARDENS General Fund Parks & Recrea T.l_on __ - 1
5/24/10 AIR TANK & BATTERY
5/11/10 FEDERAL W/H
5 /11 /10 FICA W/H
5/11/10 MEDICARE W/H
5/11/10 FICA W/H
5/11/10 MEDICARE W/H
5/11/10 FICA W/H
5 /11 /10 MEDICARE W/H
5 /11 /10 FICA W/H
5/11/10 MEDICARE W/H
5/11/10 FICA W/H
5/11/10 MEDICARE W/H
5/11/10 FICA W/H
S/11/10 MEDICARE W/H
5/11/10 FICA W/H
5/11/10 MEDICARE W/H
5/11/10 FICA W/H
5/11/10 MEDICARE W/H
S /11 /10 FICA W/H
5/11/10 MEDICARE W/H
5/11/10 FICA W/H
5/11/10 MEDICARE W/H
5 /11 /10 FICA W/H
5/11/10 MEDICARE W/H
5/11/10 FICA W/H
5/11/10 MEDICARE W/H
5 /11 /10 FICA W/H
5/11/10 MEDICARE W/H
5/11/10 FICA W/H
5/11/10 MEDICARE W/H
5 /11 /10 FICA W/H
5 /11 /10 MEDICARE W/H
5/11/10 FICA W/H
5/11/10 MEDICARE W/H
5/11/10 FICA W/H
5/11/10 MEDICARE W/H
FASCHING, PATRICIA 5/24/10
TOTAL:
126.59
General Government
TOTAL:
General Fund
Public Works
199.8
WATER METER
Water Utility
TOTAL:
199.81
General Fund
NON - DEPARTMENTAL
4,625.91
Water
General Fund
NON - DEPARTMENTAL
3,154.55
WATER METER SUPPLIES
General Fund
NON- DEPARTMENTAL
737.74
General Fund
Administration
251.51
TOTAL:
General Fund
Administration
58.82
General Fund
General Government
404.99
General Fund
General Government
94.71
General Fund
Elections
6.71
General Fund
Elections
1.57
General Fund
Finance
312.27
General Fund
Finance
73.03
General Fund
Planning
286.85
General Fund
Planning
67.08
General Fund
Protective Inspections
179.21
General Fund
Protective Inspections
41.91
General Fund
Public Works
587.41
General Fund
Public Works
137.40
General Fund
Streets & Roadways
357.62
General Fund
Streets & Roadways
83.63
General Fund
Sanitation /Weeds /Waste
5.35
General Fund
Sanitation /Weeds /Waste
1.25
General Fund
Tree Maintenance
29.11
General Fund
Tree Maintenance
6.80
General Fund
Parks & Recreation
260.10
General Fund
Parks & Recreation
60.82
Southshore Communi
Senior Community Cente
51.44
Southshore Communi
Senior Community Cente
12.04
Water Utility
Water
235.82
Water Utility
Water
55.15
Sanitary Sewer Uti
Sewer
163.46
Sanitary Sewer Uti
Sewer
38.22
Recycling Utility
Recycling
6.19
Recycling Utility
Recycling
1.45
Stormwater Managem
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT
16.51
Stormwater Managem
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT
3.86
TOTAL:
12,410.49
General Fund
Public Works
93. 31
TOTAL:
93.31
5/24_/ TILLER RENTAL COMM GARDENS General Fund Parks & Recrea T.l_on __ - 1
5/24/10 AIR TANK & BATTERY
5/11/10 FEDERAL W/H
5 /11 /10 FICA W/H
5/11/10 MEDICARE W/H
5/11/10 FICA W/H
5/11/10 MEDICARE W/H
5/11/10 FICA W/H
5 /11 /10 MEDICARE W/H
5 /11 /10 FICA W/H
5/11/10 MEDICARE W/H
5/11/10 FICA W/H
5/11/10 MEDICARE W/H
5/11/10 FICA W/H
S/11/10 MEDICARE W/H
5/11/10 FICA W/H
5/11/10 MEDICARE W/H
5/11/10 FICA W/H
5/11/10 MEDICARE W/H
S /11 /10 FICA W/H
5/11/10 MEDICARE W/H
5/11/10 FICA W/H
5/11/10 MEDICARE W/H
5 /11 /10 FICA W/H
5/11/10 MEDICARE W/H
5/11/10 FICA W/H
5/11/10 MEDICARE W/H
5 /11 /10 FICA W/H
5/11/10 MEDICARE W/H
5/11/10 FICA W/H
5/11/10 MEDICARE W/H
5 /11 /10 FICA W/H
5 /11 /10 MEDICARE W/H
5/11/10 FICA W/H
5/11/10 MEDICARE W/H
5/11/10 FICA W/H
5/11/10 MEDICARE W/H
FASCHING, PATRICIA 5/24/10
HOPKIN ELECTIONS TRAINING
General Fund
General Government
TOTAL:
11.50
11.50
FERGUSON WATERWORKS 5/24/10
WATER METER
Water Utility
Water
1,394.76
5/24/10
WATER METER
Water Utility
Water
1,659.99
S/24/10
WATER METER SUPPLIES
Water Utility
Water
4 36.88
TOTAL:
3,491.63
VETS - )J2 SORT CFY - - - -. - -___-
DT "'I S. D T P 7 T 1 ON
FUND
DEPS.?T
AMOUNT
FORUM COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY DULUTH NC
5/24/10 2010 SEALCOAT
Street Capital
Imp Street Cap,_ ?nnrovemer
2
TOTAL:
283.96
G & K SERVICES
S /24/10 CH SVC
General Fund
Municipal Buildings
90.79
5/24/10 PW SVC
General Fund
Public Works
798.94
5/24/10 SSCC SVC
Southshore COmmu
11 Senior Community Cente
_ 4 8.28 _
TOTAL:
938.01
GOPHER SIGN COMPANY
S/24/10 CITH HALL SIGNS
General Fund
Traffic Control /Str Li
9 5.12
TOTAL:
95.12
GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL, IN
5/24/10 APR SVC
Water Utility
Water
148.78
5/24/10 APR SVC
Sanitary Sewer
Uti Sewer
148. 77_
TOTAL:
297.55
GRAINGER, INC
5/24/10 AIR REGULATOR BE WA PLANT
Water Utility
Water _
76.28
TOTAL:
76.28
GROUT, TWILA
5/24/10 HENN CTY ELECTION TRAINING General Fund
General Government
TOTAL:
22.70
22.70
HANCE UTILITY SERVICES, INC.
5/24/10 UTILITY LOCATE SKATE PARK
Water Utility
Water
133.75
TOTAL:
133.75
HANSEN THORP PELLINEN OLSON, INC.
5/24/10 CTY RD 19 SANITARY PIPE RE Sanitary Sewer
Uti Sewer
2,948.25
TOTAL:
2,948.25
HAWKINS, INC.
5/24/10 CHLORINE CYLINDER
Water Utility
Water
70.00
TOTAL:
70.00
HD SUPPLY WATERWORKS, LTD.
5/24/10 WATER METER PARTS
Water Utility
Water
83.60
TOTAL:
83.60
HENN CTY INFO TECHNOLOGY DEPT
5/24/10 APR 800MHZ RADIO
General Fund
Public Works _
64.00
TOTAL:
64.00
ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST - 302131 -457
5 /11 /10 P/R DEDUCTS - DEFERRED COM
General Fund
NON - DEPARTMENTAL
1,100.00
5/11/10 P/R DEDUCTS - DEFERRED COM
General Fund
NON - DEPARTMENTAL
345.81
TOTAL:
1,445.81
ICS - HEALY -RUFF
5/24/10 CONTROL ISSUES SE WATER PL
Water Utility
Water
TOTAL:
493. 70_
493.70
INTEGRATED FIRE & SECURITY
5/24/10 SSCC - ANNUAL FIRE ALARM INS
Southshore Communi
Senior Community Cente
320.66
TOTAL:
320.66
J. BECHER & ASSOC., INC.
5/24/10 ALARM MONITORING -C.H.
General Fund
Municipal Buildings
535. 44_
TOTAL:
535.44
LOCAL LINK
5/24/10 JUN WEB LINK SVC
General Fund
Municipal Buildings
131. 80_
TOTAL:
131.80
LOCATORS & SUPPLIES INC
5/24/10 ROAD G.S.
General Fund
Streets & Roadways
231.95
S/24/10 PARKS -WEED WHIP
General Fund
Parks & Recreation
23.94
5/24/10 MARKING PAINTS
Water Utility
Water
68.76
5/24/10 SANITARY
Sanitary Sewer Uti Sewer
50.00
- .., -!i 7 AA
0 i� Al ,.
T <-'.PORT ?' JEidDOR
- MAY 24, 2010
General
Fund
VENDOR SORT KEy
-_ -. DATE
ll SCRIPL 1H _.. - -...
FUND .. -_.
ll E rz•_; MFX
z.MOUD:T
244.65
5/24/10
MARK INC PA ?NTS
Sari'�arv_ Sewer Ui
Se. w: =r
6f3
70
Fund
Administration
295
49
TOTAL:
443.41
General Government
MEDIACOM
5/24/10
SSCC - OSl/6- 06/7.5 SVC
Southshore Communi
Senior Community Cente
4 1. 95 - _
General
Fund
Finance
352.90
TOTAL:
47.95
Fund
METRO COUNCIL ENV.(SAC)
5/24/10
APR SAC REPORT
Sanitary Sewer Uti
NON- DEPARTMENTAL
2,079.
233.32
General
Fund
Public Works
TOTAL:
2,079.00
General
METRO SALES, INC.
5/24/10
MAINT SVC 02/01/10- 05 /05
/1 General Fund
Municipal Buildings
654.00
Sanitation /Weeds /Waste
6.04
General
Fund
TOTAL:
654.00
MIDWEST TRENCHLESS TECHNOLOGIES INC
5/24/10
09 CLEAN & TELEVISE
Stormwater Managem
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT
12,415.34
Senior Community Cente
58.08
TOTAL:
12,415.34
MISC. VENDOR JESSICA BLUM
5/24/10
COMM GARDEN PLOT REFUND
General Fund
NON- DEPARTMENTAL
30.00
MARY DOWNING
5/24/10
COMM GARDEN PLOT REFUND
General Fund
NON - DEPARTMENTAL
30.00
TOTAL:
60.00
MN DEPT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY
5/24/10
PRESSURE VESSEL LIC
General Fund
Public Works
50.00
5/24/10
PRESSURE VESSEL LIC
General Fund
Public Works
20.00
TOTAL:
70.00
MN DEPT OF REVENUE
5/11/10
STATE W/H
General Fund
NON - DEPARTMENTAL
2,063.11
TOTAL:
2,063.11
MINN NCPERS GROUP LIFE INS
5/11/10
MONTHLY- ELECT LIFE INS
General Fund
NON - DEPARTMENTAL
32.0
TOTAL:
32.00
NATIONAL UTILITIES CO.
5/24/10
SOLENOID VALVE AMESBURY
WA Water Utility
Water
205.20
TOTAL:
205.20
NORTHLAND CHEMICAL CORP.
5/24/10
CHEMICALS
General Fund
Public Works
61.35
TOTAL:
61.35
NORTHLAND TRUST SERVICES, INC.
5/24/10
2005 WATER BONDS * BOND
IN Water Utility
Water
24,007.50
5/24/10
2006 WATER BONDS & BOND
IN Water Utility
Water
29,000.00
TOTAL:
53,007.50
OFFICE DEPOT
5/24/10 CARTRIDGE
5/24/10 GEN SUPPLIES
General
Fund
General Government
212.96
General
Fund
General Government
31.69
TOTAL:
244.65
General
Fund
NON - DEPARTMENTAL
3,103.28
General
Fund
Administration
295
49
General
Fund
General Government
458.37
General
Fund
Elections
7.64
General
Fund
Finance
352.90
General
Fund
Planning
370.23
General
Fund
Protective Inspections
233.32
General
Fund
Public Works
619.05
General
Fund
Streets & Roadways
396.98
General
Fund
Sanitation /Weeds /Waste
6.04
General
Fund
Tree Maintenance
32.86
General
Fund
Parks & Recreation
314.31
Southshore Communi
Senior Community Cente
58.08
PERA 5/11/10 P/R DEDUCTS -PERA
5 /11 /10 P/R DEDUCTS -PERA
5/11/10 P/R DEDUCTS -PERA
5 /11 /10 P/R DEDUCTS -PERA
5 /11 /10 P/R DEDUCTS -PERA
5/11/10 P/R DEDUCTS -PERA
5/11/10 P/R DEDUCTS -PERA
5 /11 /10 P/R DEDUCTS -PERA
5/11/10 P/R DEDUCTS -PERA
5/11/10 P/R DEDUCTS -PERA
5/11/10 P/R DEDUCTS -PERA
5/11/10 P/R DEDUCTS -PERA
5 /11 /10 P/R DEDUCTS -PERA
-
.,.r- TO - 201C 4 AM
_ N . SEP ART BY VENDOR
.. 0 _ _ ,�
MA 1 ":, '7010
-AGE
_>
VENI)OR SORT K
_. 7 �T", T;SC_ TP`� 1ON
-UND
____.
�� F214 3 N t'
AM0U-
5;11 /10 P/R DEDUCTS -PERA
Pater Uti7.ity
Water
264.57
S /11 /10 P/R DEDUCTS -PERA
Sanitary Sewer Uti
Sewer
184.71
5 /11 /10 P/R DEDUCTS -PERA
Recydiing Utility
Recycling
6.96
5/11/10 P/R DEDUUCTS - PERA
Stormwater Managem
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT
__ _ , 18.64 _
TOTAL:
6,723.75
PETTY CASH
5/24/10 2010 SPRING CLEAN UP
Recycling Utility
NON- DEPARTMENTAL
TOTAL:
3 00.00
300.00
PITNEY BOWES CREDIT CORP
5/24/10 SVC CHARGE
General Fund
Municipal Buildings
29.00
TOTAL:
29.00
POTTS, KENNETH N.
5/24/10 DUFF FORFEITURE
General Fund
Police Protection
TOTAL:
701.25
701.25
QUALITY FLOW SYSTEMS, INC
5/24/10 PARTS & SVC L.S12 @ XMAS L
Sanitary Sewer Uti
Sewer
TOTAL:
652.60
652.60
QWEST
5/24/10 NEW PHONE LINE FIRE MONITO
5/24/10 SVC 05/01 -05/31
General Fund
Water Utility
Public Works
Water
141.37
315.23
5/24/10 SVC 05/01 -05/31
Water Utility
Water
236.43
TOTAL:
693.03
SAFETY -KLEEN SYSTEMS, INC.
5/24/10 ANNUAL SVC PARTS WASHER &
General Fund
Public Works
TOTAL:
399.80
399.80
SCHWAAB, INC
5/24/10 INK REFILL
General Fund
General Government
TOTAL:
95.43
95.43
SHOREWOOD TRUE VALUE
5/24/10 BATTERIES
5/24/10 RAKES RD
General Fund
General Fund
Public Works
Streets & Roadways
7.47
44.87
5/24/10 CABLE CONNECTION
General Fund
Parks & Recreation
4.58
5/24/10 BEACH HARDWARE
General Fund
Parks & Recreation
12.85
5/24/10 PAINT SUPPLIES
Water Utility
Water
53.46
5/24/10 PAINT
Water Utility
Water
55.60
5/24/10 COUPLER RETURN
Water Utility
Water
23.49-
5/24/10 PAINT SE WELL
Water Utility
Water
13.34
5/24/10 PHONE LINE TESTOR
Water Utility
Water
11.75
5/24/10 PAINT
Water Utility
Water
29.87
5/24/10 PAINT RETURN
Water Utility
Water
10.67 -
TOTAL:
199.63
SIGN LLC
5/24/10 LOGO'S EQUIP
Equipment Replacem
Equipment Replacement
TOTAL:
170.16
170.16
SOUTHSHORE SENIOR PARTNERS
5/24/10 RENTAL REFUND
Southshore Communi
NON - DEPARTMENTAL
54.00
TOTAL:
54.00
SPRINT
5/24/10 SVC 04/13 -05/12
5/24/10 SVC 04/13 -05/12
Water Utility
Sanitary Sewer Uti
Water
Sewer
93.73
93 .72
TOTAL:
187.45
SUN NEWSPAPERS
5/24/10 RESOLUTION 10 -020 - 05/06
5/24/10 ORD NO. 465 - 05/06
General Fund
General Fund
General Government
General Government
60.78
64.35
5/24/10 FREEMAN PARK BATTING 05/06
General Fund
Parks & Recreation
42.90
5/24/10 BITUMINOUS SEAL COATING 5/
Street Capital Imp
Street Capt Improvemen
123.34
.0 2010 ".:2 4 AM
C C U N
C T L 2a � >OR7 :3- VEND OR -
EUV 2 , 1 -, 2010
PACE:
6
,'EN O_. SORT tNEY
DATE
DE ' -.
l:•UID __...
DE PART -NT__...
TO
2 91 .
37
SUN PATRIOT NEWSPAPERS
5/24/10
5/24/10
SIGN ORDINANCE HRG 04/24
FREEMAN BATTING CAGE 05/0
General Fund
General Fund
General Government
Parks & Recreation
33.08
_ 33. 81_
TOTAL:
66.89
TKDA ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS PLANNERS
5/24/10
APR NELSINE DR & MEADOWVW
Street Capital Imp
Street Capt Improvemen
2
TOTAL:
2,529.91
TONKA UNITED SOCCER ASSN
5/24/10
REFUND OF OVERPYMT ON PARK
General Fund
NON- DEPARTMENTAL
8,320.00
TOTAL:
8,320.00
TWIN CITY WATER CLINIC
5/24/10
AUG BACTERIA ANALYSIS
Water Utility
Water
TOTAL:
10
100.00
ULTEIG
5/24/10
APR SVC -MANOR PARK BLDG
Park Capital Impro
Park Capital Improveme
750.00
TOTAL:
750.00
UNITED LABORATORIES
5/24/10
CHEMICALS PARK SUPPLIES
General Fund
Parks & Recreation
748.36
TOTAL:
748.36
UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA
5/24/10
WKSHOP 05/20/10- JOE P.
General Fund
Protective Inspections
85.00
5/24/10
WKSHOP 05/20- CHARLIE & CHR
General Fund
Public Works
170 .00
TOTAL:
255.00
WACONIA FARM SUPPLY
5/24/10
WALK MOWER
General Fund
Parks & Recreation
TOTAL:
309.93
309.93
WELLS FARGO HEALTH BENEFIT SVCS
5/11/10
P/R DEDUCTS -HSA
General Fund
NON - DEPARTMENTAL
960.83
5/11/10
P/R DEDUCTS -HSA
General Fund
General Government
96.00
TOTAL:
1,056.83
WSB AND ASSOCIATES
5/24/10
MAR HARDING LN /AVE REHAB
Street Capital Imp
Street Capt Improvemen
301.00
TOTAL:
301.00
ZERBY, MICHAEL S.
5/24/10
SSCC - BROADBANK NETWORK UPG Southshore Communi
Senior Community Cents
TOTAL:
158.08
158.08
—PAYROLL EXPENSES
5/10/2010 - 99/99/9999
General Fund
Administration
4,221.29
General Fund
General Government
6,548.19
General Fund
Elections
109.14
General Fund
Finance
5,041.43
General Fund
Planning
5,289.13
General Fund
Protective Inspections
3,333.10
General Fund
Public Works
9,677.13
General Fund
Streets & Roadways
5,777.82
General Fund
Sanitation /Weeds /Waste
86.22
General Fund
Tree Maintenance
469.32
General Fund
Parks & Recreation
4,490.30
Southshore Communi
Senior Community Cents
829.64
0 - 1 20 20'0 12:14 All ' O N ^ 1 !, R1;PORT BY i3NDO-R MAY 2:4, 2010 P7GE: 7
'Zr QD �l� SORT r {
liATP C i 1;r.
_.. _. aUN-)
DEPARTMENT
"PAYROLL EXPENSES
Water Uti-_ty
Water
3,9
Sanitary Sewer Uti
Sewer
2,692.15
Recycling iJtility
Recycling
99.76
Stormwater Managem
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT
26 6.19
TOTAL:
52,875.09
FUND TOTALS
101
General Fund
114,022.87
402
Park Capital Improvements
750.00
4.03
Equipment Replacement
170.16
404
Street Capital Improvemen
4,675.21
490
Southshore Community Ctr.
1,919.17
601
Water Utility
65,462.73
611
Sanitary Sewer Utility
19,099.76
621
Recycling Utility
414.38
631
Stormwater ManagementUtil
13,212.04
GRAND TOTAL: 219,726.32
TOTAL PAGES: 7
(' ;: U Ca C _ L Rr PngT. 5, )EIIARTMENT
- MA'` 2-- , 2010
IA
!7E2F2GhCNT
FUTaT'
TLVDOi NAME
CC 7E
D yr , � "
P�1At
D.T
NOD -DEPARTMENTAL
Ger.Pra1 rand
hl7 TPS -
5/11/10
FED 'R L W/H
1 ' 5
5/11/10
FICA. W/H
3,154.55
5 /i1/10
MEDICARE W/H
737.74
PERA
5 /11 /10
P/R DED_UCTS... PERA
3,103.28
ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST- 302131 -457
5/11/10
P/R DEDUCTS - DEFERRED CAM
1,100.00
5/11/10
P/R DEDUCTS- DEFERRED CON
345.81
MN DEPT OF REVENUE
5/11/10
STATE W/H
2,063.11
MISC. VENDOR JESSICA BLUM
5/24/10
COMM GARDEN PLOT REFUND
30.00
MARY DOWNING
5/24/10
COMM GARDEN PLOT REFUND
30.00
MINN NCPERS GROUP LIFE INS
5/11/10
MONTHLY- ELECT LIFE INS
32.00
WELLS FARGO HEALTH BENEFIT SVCS
5/11/10
P/R DEDUCTS -HSA
960.83
TONKA UNITED SOCCER ASSN
5/24/10
REFUND OF OVERPYMT ON PARK
8,320.00
TOTAL:
24,503.23
Administration
General Fund
EFTPS - FEDERAL W/H
5/11/10
FICA W/H
251.51
5/11/10
MEDICARE W/H
58.82
PERA
5/11/10
P/R DEDUCTS -PERA
295.49
* *PAYROLL EXPENSES
5/10/2010 - 99/99/9999 _
4,221.29
TOTAL:
4,827.11
General Government
General Fund
EFTPS - FEDERAL W/H
5/11/10
FICA W/H
404.99
5 /11 /10
MEDICARE W/H
94.71
PERA
5/11/10
P/R DEDUCTS -PERA
458.37
FASCHING, PATRICIA
5/24/10
HOPKIN ELECTIONS TRAINING
11.50
GROUT, TWILA
5/24/10
HENN CTY ELECTION TRAINING
22.70
OFFICE DEPOT
5/24/10
CARTRIDGE
212.96
5/24/10
GEN SUPPLIES
31.69
SUN PATRIOT NEWSPAPERS
5/24/10
SIGN ORDINANCE HRG 04/24
33.08
WELLS FARGO HEALTH BENEFIT SVCS
5/11/10
P/R DEDUCTS -HSA
96.00
SUN NEWSPAPERS
5/24/10
RESOLUTION 10 -020 - 05/06
60.78
5/24/10
ORD NO. 465 - 05/06
64.35
SCHWAAB, INC
5/24/10
INK REFILL
95.43
* *PAYROLL EXPENSES
5/10/2010 - 99/99/9999
6,548.19
TOTAL:
8,134.75
Elections
General Fund
EFTPS - FEDERAL W/H
5/11/10
FICA W/H
6.71
5/11/10
MEDICARE W/H
1.57
PERA
5/11/10
P/R DEDUCTS -PERA
7.64
* *PAYROLL EXPENSES
5/10/2010 - 99/99/9999
109.14
TOTAL:
125.06
Finance
General Fund
EFTPS - FEDERAL W/H
5/11/10
FICA W/H
312.27
5 /11 /10
MEDICARE W/H
73.03
PERA
5/11/10
P/R DEDUCTS -PERA
352.90
* *PAYROLL EXPENSES
5/10/2010 - 99/99/9999
5,041.43
TOTAL:
5,779.63
Professional Svcs
General Fund
ABDO, EICK & MEYERS, LLP
5/24/10
2009 AUDIT SVCS
10,60 0.00
TOTAL:
10,600.00
Planning
General Fund
EFTPS - FEDERAL W/H
5/11/10
FICA W/H
286.85
5/11/10
MEDICARE W/H
67.08
PERA
5/11/10
P/R DEDUCTS -PERA
370.23
0 20 _ 0 "10 ? AM
C REPORT i3 - =ARiMENT _ M'aY
24, 2010 "AG T'
2
DE.PARTM uT rti.iND
VENDOR \F�Ml..___.
DA D C -TI ON, __ _....
AM= NT
* Pr" -.Y. C - .L EXPENSES .
/i0 /20_i.0 - 99/99/999Ii
;,25
TOTAL:
6,07.3.29
Municipal Buildings General Fund
CITIES DIGITAL INC.
5/24/10 LASERFICHE SUPPORT & UPDA
_,690.00
CULLIGAN BOTTLED WATER
5/24/10 DRINKING WATER SVC
88.39
G & K SERVICES
S/24/10 CH SVC
90.79
ADVANCED IMAGING SOLUTIONS INC
5/24/10 MAINT SVC O5 /15 -06/15
67.00
5/24/10 CMY90G COPIER
13,493.05
5/24/10 BOOKLET FINISHER - COPIER
1,129.61
METRO SALES, INC.
5/24/10 MAINT SVC 02/01/10- OS /05/1
654.00
PITNEY BOWES CREDIT CORP
5/24/10 SVC CHARGE
29.00
LOCAL LINK
5/24/10 JUN WEB LINK SVC
131.80
J. BECHER & ASSOC., INC.
5/24/10 ALARM MONITORING -C.H.
535.4
TOTAL:
17,909.08
Police Protection General Fund
POTTS, KENNETH N.
5/24/10 DUFF FORFEITURE
701.25
TOTAL:
701.25
Protective Inspections General Fund
EFTPS - FEDERAL W/H
5 /11 /10 FICA W/H
179.21
5/11/10 MEDICARE W/H
41.91
PERA
5/11/10 P/R DEDUCTS -PERA
233.32
UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA
5/24/10 WKSHOP 05/20/10- JOE P.
85.00
-PAYROLL EXPENSES
5/10/2010 - 99/99/9999 _
3,333.10
TOTAL:
3,872.54
City Engineer General Fund
ALHINSON REPROGRAPHICS
5/24/10 DIGITAL BOND PRINTS
5 .93
TOTAL:
5.93
Public Works General Fund
EFTPS - FEDERAL W/H
5/11/10 FICA W/H
587.41
5 /11 /10 MEDICARE W/H
137.40
PERA
5 /11 /10 P/R DEDUCTS -PERA
619.05
CARQUEST AUTO PARTS
5/24/10 OIL FILTERS
18.60
5/24/10 HITCH BALL & ADAPTER
35.29
DELEGARD TOOL CO
5/24/10 AIR TANK & BATTERY
199.81
MN DEPT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY
5/24/10 PRESSURE VESSEL LIC
50.00
5/24/10 PRESSURE VESSEL LIC
20.00
G & K SERVICES
5/24/10 PW SVC
798.94
HENN CTY INFO TECHNOLOGY DEPT
5/24/10 APR 800MHZ RADIO
64.00
NORTHLAND CHEMICAL CORP.
5/24/10 CHEMICALS
61.35
SAFETY -KLEEN SYSTEMS, INC.
5/24/10 ANNUAL SVC PARTS WASHER &
399.80
SHOREWOOD TRUE VALUE
5/24/10 BATTERIES
7.47
UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA
5/24/10 WKSHOP 05/20- CHARLIE & CHR
170.00
QWEST
5/24/10 NEW PHONE LINE FIRE MONITO
141.37
EMERGENCY AUTOMOTIVE TECHNOLOGIES, INC
5/24/10 WARNING LIGHTS
93.31
AIR COMPRESSORS PLUS L.L.C.
5/24/10 AIR COMPRESSOR PARTS
202.35
-PAYROLL EXPENSES
5/10/2010 - 99/99/9999
9,67 7.13
TOTAL:
13,283.28
Streets & Roadways General Fund
EFTPS - FEDERAL W/H
5 /11 /10 FICA W/H
357.62
5 /11 /10 MEDICARE W/H
83.63
PERA
5/11/10 P/R DEDUCTS -PERA
396.98
LOCATORS & SUPPLIES INC
5/24/10 ROAD G.S.
231.95
SHOREWOOD TRUE VALUE
5/24/10 RAKES RD
44.87
0':i 2 . 7010 1 2 AM
f., O . ,�� 1 , _ i, RE O_ T - 1 1 DEPA"ITM 'OT MAV
24, 20 -10
PA
_.
VENDO, NAME
L K
V
AMOUN
* *PAYROLL EXPENSES
5 /:10/2010 - 99/99/9999
x,777
82
"OTALr.
6,992.8'7
Traffic Control /Str Li.
General Fund CITY OF EXCELSIOR
5/24/10
NOV 2009- 2010 TRAFFIC
50.42
GOPHER SIGN COMPANY
5/24/10
CITH HALL SIGNS
_ 95.12
TOTAL:
145.54
Sanitation /Weeds /Waste
General Fund EFTPS - FEDERAL W/H
5 /11 /10
FICA W/H
5.35
5/11 /10
MEDICARE W/H
1.25
PERA
S /11 /10
P/R DEDUCTS -PERA
6.04
* *PAYROLL EXPENSES
5/10/2010 - 99/99/9999
86. _22_
TOTAL:
98.86
Tree Maintenance
General Fund EFTPS - FEDERAL W/H
5/11/10
FICA W/H
29.11
5 /11 /10
MEDICARE W/H
6.80
PERA,
5/11/10
P/R DEDUCTS -PERA
32.86
* *PAYROLL EXPENSES
5/10/2010 - 99/99/9999
469.3
TOTAL:
538.09
Parks & Recreation
General Fund EFTPS - FEDERAL W/H
5 /11 /10
FICA W/H
260.10
5/11/10
MEDICARE W/H
60.82
PERA
5 /11 /10
P/R DEDUCTS -PERA
314.31
A -1 MINNETONKA RENTAL
5/24/10
SOD CUTTER PARKS
16.04
ANDERSON, KRISTI B.
5/24/10
PARK COMMISSION MTG 05/11/
260.00
BIFFS, INC.
5/24/10
MAY SVC
869.50
COMMUNITY REC RESOURCES
5/24/10
PARK COORDINATOR SVC 5 /10-
2,295.00
LOCATORS & SUPPLIES INC
5/24/10
PARKS -WEED WHIP
23.94
ATHLETIC METRO SUPPLY
5/24/10
BASES & HARDWARE PARKS
723.33
SUN PATRIOT NEWSPAPERS
5/24/10
FREEMAN BATTING CAGE 05/0
33.81
SHOREWOOD TRUE VALUE
5/24/10
CABLE CONNECTION
4.58
5/24/10
BEACH HARDWARE
12.85
UNITED LABORATORIES
5/24/10
CHEMICALS PARK SUPPLIES
748.36
WACONIA FARM SUPPLY
5/24/10
WALK MOWER
309.93
SUN NEWSPAPERS
5/24/10
FREEMAN PARK BATTING 05/06
42.90
DELANO RENTAL, INC.
5/24/10
TILLER RENTAL COMM GARDENS
126.59
* *PAYROLL EXPENSES
5/10/2010 - 99/99/9999
4,490.3
TOTAL:
10,592.36
Park Capital Improveme
Park Capital Impro ULTEIG
5/24/10
APR SVC -MANOR PARK BLDG
750.0
TOTAL:
750.00
Equipment Replacement
Equipment Replacem SIGN LLC
5/24/10
LOGO'S EQUIP
170.16
TOTAL:
170.16
Street Capt Improvemen
Street Capital Imp TKDA ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS PLANNERS
5/24/10
APR NELSINE DR & MEADOWVW
2,529.91
WSB AND ASSOCIATES
5/24/10
MAR HARDING LN /AVE REHAB
301.00
SUN NEWSPAPERS
5/24/10
BITUMINOUS SEAL COATING 5/
123.34
BOLTON & MENK, INC.
5/24/10
OVERLAY PROJECT
1,437.00
FORUM COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY DULUTH NE
5/24/10
2010 SEALCOAT
283.
TOTAL:
4,675.21
NON - DEPARTMENTAL
Southshore Communi SOUTHSHORE SENIOR PARTNERS
5/24/10
RENTAL REFUND
_ 54.00
TOTAL:
54,00
Senior Community Cente
Southshore Communi EFTPS - FEDERAL W/H
5 /11 /10
FICA W/H
51.44
5 /11 /10
MEDICARE W/H
12.04
DEPZ I .: M1 TENT
Water
NON - DEPARTMENTAL
C C ,i N r .__. OP", BY i LvAR MEN'T
- AY 2 4 , ' tO .. 0
1D-G7:
..
5/11/10
FUND VENDOR N AME
D ATE
- - _i CR - 7 7ON - - -_. - - -. - -
-_. •NIO.TN
P/R DEDUCTS -PERA
PERA
5/11/10
`/R DEDUCTS -PERA
58.08
2,250.00
ANDERSON, KRISTI B.
5/24/10
SSCC -RENEW WEBSITE DOMAIN
99.00
COMMUNITY REC RESOURCES
5/24/10
SSCC ASSISTANT - 05/10- 05/20
240.00
5/24/10
G & K SERVICES
5 /24/7.0
SSCC SVC
48.28
APR SVC
MEDIACOM
5/24/10
SSCC - 051/6 - 06/15 SVC
47.95
50.00
ZERBY, MICHAEL S.
5/24/10
SSCC- BROADBANK NETWORK UPG
158.08
INTEGRATED FIRE & SECURITY
5/24/10
SSCC - ANNUAL FIRE ALARM INS
320.66
* *PAYROLL EXPENSES
5/10/2010 - 99/99/9999
829.64
TOTAL:
1,865.17
Water Utility EFTPS - FEDERAL W/H
5/11/10
FICA W/H
235.82
5/11/10
MEDICARE W/H
55.15
PERA
5/11/10
P/R DEDUCTS -PERA
264.87
ABDO, EICK & MEYERS, LLP
5/24/10
2009 AUDIT SVCS
2,250.00
CARQUEST AUTO PARTS
5/24/10
AIR REGULATOR
58.16
HAWKINS, INC.
5/24/10
CHLORINE CYLINDER
70.00
GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL, IN
5/24/10
APR SVC
148.78
HANCE UTILITY SERVICES, INC.
5/24/10
UTILITY LOCATE SKATE PARK
133.75
ICS - HEALY -RUFF
5/24/10
CONTROL ISSUES BE WATER PL
493.70
LOCATORS & SUPPLIES INC
5/24/10
MARKING PAINTS
68.76
SPRINT
5/24/10
SVC 04/13 -05/12
93.73
FERGUSON WATERWORKS
5/24/10
WATER METER
1,394.76
5/24/10
WATER METER
1,659.99
5/24/10
WATER METER SUPPLIES
436.88
NORTHLAND TRUST SERVICES, INC.
5/24/10
2005 WATER BONDS * BOND IN
24,007.50
5/24/10
2006 WATER BONDS & BOND IN
29,000.00
SHOREWOOD TRUE VALUE
5/24/10
PAINT SUPPLIES
53.46
5/24/10
PAINT
55.60
5/24/10
COUPLER RETURN
23.49-
5/24/10
PAINT BE WELL
13.34
5/24/10
PHONE LINE TESTOR
11.75
5/24/10
PAINT
29.87
5/24/10
PAINT RETURN
10.67
-
TWIN CITY WATER CLINIC
5/24/10
AUG BACTERIA ANALYSIS
100.00
QWEST
5/24/10
SVC 05/01 -05/31
315.23
5/24/10
SVC 05/01 -05/31
236.43
GRAINGER, INC
5/24/10
AIR REGULATOR BE WA PLANT
76.28
HD SUPPLY WATERWORKS, LTD.
5/24/10
WATER METER PARTS
83.60
NATIONAL UTILITIES CO.
5/24/10
SOLENOID VALVE AMESBURY WA
205.20
* *PAYROLL EXPENSES
5/10/2010 - 99/99/9999
3,944.28
TOTAL:
65,462.73
Sanitary Sewer Uti METRO COUNCIL ENV.(SAC)
5/24/10
APR SAC REPORT
2,079.0
TOTAL:
2.079.00
Sewer Sanitary Sewer Uti EFTPS - FEDERAL W/H
PERA
ABDO, SICK & MEYERS, LLP
CLAREY'S SAFETY EQUIPMENT, INC
CONNEY SAFETY PRODUCTS
CITY OF EXCELSIOR
GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL, IN
LOCATORS & SUPPLIES INC
SPRINT
5/11/10
FICA W/H
163.46
5/11/10
MEDICARE W/H
38.22
5/11/10
P/R DEDUCTS -PERA
184.71
5/24/10
2009 AUDIT SVCS
2,250.00
5/24/10
4 LEVEL GAS MONITOR CALIBR
53.44
5/24/10
GEN. SUPPLIES
191.39
5/24/10
1ST QTR SEWER JOIN
7,485.29
5/24/10
APR SVC
148.77
5/24/10
SANITARY
50.00
5/24/10
MARKING PAINTS
68.76
5/24/10
SVC 04/13 -05/12
93.72
OS -20 :3010 _ 1 2 1' P,b " -.
._
0 .., N c r L z.'POR R il:..:P A.P �'* , NI -
MAY
24, 2010
.`'
DEPAh ni iEN-`
FUND
` ENTDO' N AME
D= i'r,
DI R -PT ON;
AMODU
T
QUALITY FLOW SYSTEMS, INC:
5/
PARTS &. SVC L.S1 XMAS L
652.60
HANSEN THORP PELLINEN OLSON,
INC_
5/24/10
CTY RD 19 SANITARY PIPE RE
2,948.25
—PAYROLL, EXPENSES
S /10 /2010 - 99/99/9999
2,69 2.15
TOTAL:
17,020.76
NON - DEPARTMENTAL
Recycling Utility
PETTY CASH
5/24/10
2010 SPRING CLEAN UP
300
TOTAL:
300.00
Recycling
Recycling Utility
EFTPS - FEDERAL W/H
5/11/10
FICA W/H
6.19
5/11/10
MEDICARE W/H
1.45
PERA
5/11/10
P/R DEDUCTS -PERA
6.98
—PAYROLL EXPENSES
5/10/2010 - 99/99/9999
99.76
TOTAL:
114.38
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT
Stormwater Managem
SEEPS - FEDERAL W/H
5/11/10
FICA W/H
16.51
5/11/10
MEDICARE W/H
3.86
PERA
5 /11 /10
P/R DEDUCTS -PERA
18.64
MIDWEST TRENCHLESS TECHNOLOGIES INC
5/24/10
09 CLEAN & TELEVISE
12,415.34
BOLTON & MENK, INC.
5/24/10
MISC ENG /SURVEY
491.50
—PAYROLL EXPENSES
5/10/2010 - 99/99/9999
266.19
TOTAL:
13,212.04
FUND TOTALS ----
-- - - -- -
--
101
General Fund
114,022.87
402
Park Capital Improvements
750.00
403
Equipment Replacement
170.16
404
Street Capital Improvemen
4,675.21
490
Southshore Community Ctr.
1,919.17
601
Water Utility
65,462.73
611
Sanitary Sewer Utility
19,099.76
621
Recycling Utility
414.38
631
Stormwater Management Util
13,212.04
GRAND TOTAL: 219,726.32
TOTAL PAGES: 5
('-] I
The City of Shorewood contracts with the City of Mound to provide fire service to Enchanted Island and
has been doing so for several years. The current agreement covers three years and renews automatically
for an additional three years. We are in year two of the agreement.
The other cities in the agreement are Spring Park, Minnetrista, and Minnetonka Beach. During the
contract period, the City of Spring Park raised a few issues with the agreement, primarily with the
division of the costs for debt service on the fire building. Several discussions with Spring Park and the
committee took place last year and a revised agreement is the result.
The changes to the agreement do not affect the amount Shorewood pays for services, as the base
formula did not change. The formula for determining payment consists of 1) utilization of firefighter
hours - average percent of total firefighter hours for the most recent previous three (3) year period
(20%), 2) Land Value — average percent of total market value for all land values within the fire district
area for the most recent previous three (3) year period(20 %), 3) Structure Value — average percent of
market value for structures for the most recent previous three (3) year period as a percent of the total
structure value in the Mound fire service area (30 %), and 4) Population — average percent of total
population in the Mound fire service area from the most recent previous three (3) year period (30 %).
This formula is used for both operations and building costs. The agreement provides an alternative to
the current formula for the allocation of facility payments. If Shorewood elects, we can request the
payment for the building based on the average cost of facility payments for all budgeted years beginning
with 2004 rather than based on the most recent previous three (3) year period.
The current cost of the contract is approximately $23,000 annually and the past couple years, our
allocation decreased.
I attached a few documents outlining the history of the contribution formula and changes to the
agreement. All the participating cities passed the amended agreement.
Council Action:
1. Approve the amended agreement
2. Do not approve the agreement
3. Suggest changes
4. Do nothing
Mound Fire Defiartment
Contract Formula Comparison lunation
January 22, 2010
A)® Old Fire Contract: (years prior to 2007 contract): the old and obsolete fire contract formula
had two components (or factors). The components and allocation of costs was based upon two
factors U & V. The breakdown or allocation of costs was based on equal parts of the following
two factors which equal 100 %.
• Utilization (U) — 50% of the fire service formula and costs were based upon each individual
cities average percentage of the total firefighter personnel hours used for the most recent
previous three (3) year period.
• Value of Property (V) — 50% of the fire service formula and costs were based upon the
percent market valuation of entire property from the previous tax year as provided by the
Hennepin County Assessor. Each cities market valuation percentage is based upon their cities
percent of the total market valuation of all the properties within the Mound Fire Department
service area.
B). New Fire Contract Formula: (that was implemented in 2007): the new fire contract and
costs will be based upon and include four components or factors. The total allocation of the costs
for each contracting party will be based upon the four allocation factors. The factors are not
weighted equally but utilize more components than the old formula including: U & V -L & V -S
& P These factors are weighted as described below and equals a total of 100 %.
• Utilization (U) — 20% of the fire service formula and costs will be based upon each
individual cities average percentage of the total firefighter personnel hours used for the most
recent previous three (3) year period.
Value Land (V -L) — 20% of the fire service formula and costs will be based upon each
individual cites average percent of market valuation of land from the most recent previous
three (3) year period as provided by the Hennepin County Assessor. Each cities market
valuation of land percentage is based upon their cities percent of the total market valuation of
all the land values within the Mound Fire Department service area.
Value Structure (V -S) — 30% of the fire service formula and costs will be based upon each
individual cities average percent of market value of structures from the most recent previous
three (3) year period as provided by the Hennepin County Assessor. Each cities market
valuation of structure percentage is based upon their cities percent of the total market
valuation of all the structure values within the Mound Fire Department service area.
• Population (P) — 30% of the fire service formula and costs will be based upon each
individual cities average percent of total population in the Mound Fire Department service
area from the most recent previous three (3) year period. The population figures are to be
provided by each city clerk and verified.
, .. ��,t;. r, , _tb, ..,Ff� S�,__,. t3 , t,
Cam Proposed New Fire Contract Formula: (effective January 1, 2010): The new fire contract
and budgeted costs for operations, the annual pension contribution, and all capital
equipment will be based upon and include four components or factors. The total allocation of
the costs for the budget items listed above and for each contracting party will be based upon the
four allocation factors per the 2007 fore contract formula.
1. The pro posed co sts
service) will b e
and capital equipment and - d among parties based o o two factors.
# >'
be The overall budget contribution "average percentage" paid by each individual city
since the new facility completion. This calculation will be based upon a rolling and
continuous budget contribution average (refer to example calculation page attached).
NOTES: The facility debt service payments will be separated from the operational budget,
pension plan contribution, and capital equipment budget plan. The facility contribution allocation
and budget contribution made by each city each year will be based upon the lesser of the two $$
amounts as calculated by option a. or b. as listed above.
Mound Fire Department Fire Contract Formula and Facility Cost Allocation Logic:
Definitions:
Facility Costs: the rent, lease payment or debt service payment made to the Mound HRA on
behalf of the fire department until budget year 2023. This includes the fire department portion of
the building only costs only.
Operations Costs: all of the variable costs associated with the daily operations and activities of
the fire department, including staff wages, administration, apparatus, equipment, supplies,
utilities, etc.
Capital Equipment: all of the budgeted capital equipment purchases including fire trucks and
apparatus, major tools, safety equipment, and other necessary items needed to sustain efficient
and effective fire department operations.
Annual Pension Contribution: the total budgeted amount paid to the Mound Fire Department
Relief Association by all of the contracting cities
K
Recommended Formula Options — Fire Commission
3
SUMMARY ' T ERMS
CON TRACT FOR FIRE SERVICE
I. Background
Last summer, one of the contracting cities requested that certain revisions be
made to the contract. At the time, the request related primarily to how the cost for debt
service payments on the bonds that were issued to pay for the construction of the fire
portion of the public safety building would be calculated. Discussions have taken place,
and as a result of those discussions, a proposal for a modified fire service agreement has
been drafted.
The purpose of this summary is to point out those modifications to the 2007
agreement which are viewed as significant. A redlined version of the agreement is also
attached which shows all of the proposed changes.
II. Summary
References in this summary are to the pages of the attached redlined draft. It should
also be noted that the final page of the redlined draft contains a legend explaining the
colors and linings. A review of that legend will help in understanding the redlines.
By way of quick explanation, only printing in red (deleted) or blue (added) are true
changes from the 2007 contract. Everything in green is either moved from (strike
through) or moved to (underlined) a different location.
Debt Service Pa vents
i. A definition of facility payments was added (p. 3).
ii. An alternate formula for calculating the share of facility payments
was added (p. 20). The formula extends the period for averaging
the facility costs for an electing city.
iii. A provision for recapture of facility payments which were
uncollected as a result of a city's election under the new
formula was added (p.9). This provision applies to cities whose
facility payments are less as a result of the election.
These modifications address Spring Darks primary concern while also providing an
opportunity for the other cities to continue to elect the current fonnula. It also
provides a mechanism by which Mound may recapture any additional cost it incurs as
a result of an election to be treated under the new alternate formula.
Mound Fire Department
r. rw
For the 20 + years prior to January 1, 2001 the Fire Contract term was a one
(1) year agreement that automatically renewed for a one (1) year term. The
cost allocation formula was also the same for over 20 years.
• On January 1, 2001 based upon our request, the Fire Contract term length
was changed to a three (3) year agreement, which also automatically
renewed for three years. This new contract used the same cost allocation
formula as the previous one year contract.
• On January 1, 2007 the Fire Contract Formula (cost allocation formula) was
approved and changed by all parties to the contract. The cost allocation
formula change was based upon much discussion and consideration by all of
the fire contracting cities and recommended by the Fire Commission. The
new cost allocation formula and contract were approved by the Mound City
Council. The fire contract term length remained at three (3) years with the
same automatic renewal feature.
• Officially, we are still operating under the 2007 contract, however effective
January 1, 2010 we propose a new and improved version of the fire contract
that clarifies and better defines the terms of the contract agreement. The
language of the old fire contract needed clarification and several corrections
to improve the contract. The fire contract term will remain at three (3) years.
• There are no significant (or negative) financial ramifications related to the
new Fire Contract. There is a new fire formula component added to the
public safety facility lease or rent payment that addresses concerns others
had about large increases or fluctuations in the building lease /rent.
gsp
JOINT COOPERATIVE A EE ENT AN
CONTRACT F FIRE SERVICE
I
i X �
6 The City of Shorewood wishes to have fire protection service furnished by Mound's City
7 Fire Department.
8 Mound has the facilities, equipment, and capability to provide fire protection service to
9 the City of Shorewood and is willing and able to do so. Mound has prepared for the City of
10 Shorewood an annual financial budget covering truck bonded indebtedness, fire equipment,
11 capital outlays, annual operating costs, Facility Payments, and the costs and expenses of the
12 Mound Fireman's Relief Association.
13 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants of the parties hereto, it
14 is agreed as follows:
15 Section 1. DEFINITION OF TERMS. For purposes of this Agreement, the terms in
16 this section have the meanings given them.
17 1.01. "Contract teen" means the period during which fire protection services are to be
18 rendered or were rendered to the City of Shorewood by the Mound City Fire Department. The
19 initial term of this contract commences as of January 1, 2010, and terminates on December 31,
20 2012. Successive terms will be for three -year periods with the first such successive three -year
21 period beginning on January 1, 2013.
300873v14 DJK MU220 -3 1
22 1.02. `Contracting city" means any city that is a party to this Agreement, or a separate
23 agreement containing the same provisions, The contracting cities are Minnetonka Beach,
28 1.04. "Effective Date" means January 1, 201 O
29 1.05. "Fire Service Area" are the geographic boundaries of the cities of Spring Park,
30 Mound and Minnetonka Beach; and for Minnetrista and Shorewood are the areas shown on
31 Exhibit A.
32 1.06 "Fire Service Committee" means the advisory committee to be comprised of up to
33 two persons selected by each of the Contracting cities, and the chief of the Mound Fire
34 Department.
35 1.07. "Facility Payments" means the portion of the payments allocated to the fire
36 department, made by the City of Mound to the Mound HRA in any budget year which are used
37 exclusively to make debt service payments on the bonds issued in connection with the
38 construction of the Mound Public Safety Building; and includes any bonds issued to refinance
39 the initial bonds, but only i£ (i) the debt service payments on such refinancing bonds do not
40 exceed the debt service payments on the initial bonds; and (ii) the term of the refinancing bonds
41 does not exceed the remaining term of the initial bonds at the time of refinancing (collectively,
42 the "Bonds ")
300873v14 DJK MU220 -3 2
43 Section. 2. AREA PROTECTED, The Mound Fire Department will provide fire
44 protection service for the City of Shorewood in the area ( "Fire Service Area ") described above
45 and in Exhibit A.
52 emergency medical, HAZMAT and special rescue services. Any fire inspection and prevention
53 subcontractor employed by a contracting city must be approved and supervised by the Mound
54 Fire Department Fire Chief.
55 Section 4. ADMINISTRATIVE RESPONSIBILITY.
56 4.01. Fire protection services rendered to the contracting cities are under the direction of
57 Mound. The level of services rendered, the standards of performance, the hiring and discipline of
58 the personnel assigned, and other matters relating to regulation and policies, are determined by
59 Mound. Disputes between the parties to this Agreement as to the extent of functions and services
60 to be rendered, or the level or manner of performance of such services, are to be resolved by the
61 Mound City Manager. If a contracting city disagrees with the resolution of the dispute, the
62 contracting city may appeal in writing, within 30 days of receipt of the resolution, to Mound
63 asking for arbitration as provided in section 8. Mound must submit a monthly report of services
64 rendered to each contracting city. Mound will genuinely consider any suggestions regarding
65 contractual, service level and financial changes that it considers helpful or beneficial.
300873v14 DJK MU220 -3 3
80 Firefighter's Relief Association, withholding tax, insurance, etc. for such firefighters. A
81 contracting city is not required to furnish any of the foregoing fringe benefits or assume any
82 other liability of employment to any employee or other person assigned to fire protection duty in
83 the contracting city. If a contracting city employs such an employee or person directly,
84 independent of this Agreement, to provide fire protection services in the contracting city, all
85 obligations and liabilities with respect to employment of such independent employee or person
86 will be the responsibility of the contracting city. No such direct employment of fire protection
87 staff may be entered into by the contracting city without first obtaining the written approval of
88 the Mound City Manager.
300873v14 DJK MU220 -3 4
89 Section 6. TERMINATION. This agreement is in effect until December 31, 2012, and
90 will be renewed automatically thereafter for successive three-year contract terins unless
91 cancelled with respect to any party by that party serving written notice upon the Mound City
Manager
,
�e F
94 7.01. ALLOCATION O COSTS Th C os t All oca ti on Formula is shown on the
95 attached Exhibit B. Exhibit B may be amended from time to time in the manner provided in
96 Section 16.
97 7.02. [Intentionally Blank].
98 7.03. RECAPTURE, ELECTION. On or before October 1 of each year, Mound will
99 provide a written statement to each Contracting city showing how the cost allocation for Facility
100 Payments would be alternatively treated in accordance with the averaging provisions of
101 Paragraph I, and of Paragraph II of Exhibit B. After receiving such written statement, not later
102 than December 10 of each year, Shorewood must notify Mound that it elects to have the cost
103 allocation for Facility Payments treated in accordance with the averaging provisions of
104 Paragraph II of Exhibit B. Absent such election, all costs will be subject to the averaging
105 provisions of Paragraph I of Exhibit B. Mound will determine the difference in cost allocation to
106 Shorewood for each year that the election is made. To the extent available, Mound will utilize
107 interest earned on the fire portion of the debt service reserve fund for the Bonds to reduce or
108 eliminate any shortfall in Facility Payments attributable to such election. If more than one city
109 elects treatment under Paragraph II of Exhibit B in any given year, the interest will be allocated
110 prorata based on the difference in cost allocation for each electing city. If Shorewood terminates
111 this Agreement, or any extension thereof, the total of all net shortfalls attributable to
30087304 DJK MU220 -3 5
112 Shore wood's Paragraph 11 elections will be due and payable by Shorewood during the last year
113 of its participation in the Agreement.
114 7.04. BUDGET. Not later than September 1 of each year, following review by the Fire
December 115 Committee, Mound must notify each contracting city of the estimated costs for the next contract
116 year, including all capital purchases. The final estimated cost will be deten by Mound and
117 the contracting cities notified by of d cost must be paid
equal 118 in . - rly installments on April 1, July I and October I of - next contract
119 year. The contracting city understands and agrees that it is impossible to project with complete
120 accuracy the actual cost for labor and equipment as well as the service to be required by each city
121 for the forthcoming contract year, and therefore agrees to a yearly audit to adjust the prior year's
122 estimated cost of service to the actual costs incurred by Mound. Mound will tabulate the actual
123 cost of the Fire Department expenses for the prior contract year and will, as soon as practicable,
124 submit a summary of actual costs to each contracting city. The actual cost and a summary
125 thereof of the Fire Department expenses for the prior year will be submitted by Mound to all
126 contracting cities annually. The actual costs set forth for the prior contract year may result in
127 either a credit or a debit to each contracting city. A surplus carried over from the prior year must
128 be placed in a reserve fund maintained by Mound. The reserve fund will be accrued until a fund
129 balance equal to ten percent of the prior year's operating budget is arrived at. When the ten
130 percent reserve fund level is established, each contracting city will decide whether to reduce its
131 annual operating contribution to offset the operating fund balance or contribute to sustain the ten
132 percent reserve fund level. The reserve fund may be utilized to pay any increase in actual costs
133 for service if a majority of the contracting cities approve by written notice to the Mound City
134 manager. If a majority does not approve the utilization of moneys from the reserve fund, the
300873v14 DJK MU220 -3 6
135 additional annual costs will be included in the following years budget. The allocation of the
136 credits or debits among the Contracting cities will be made pursuant to the basic cost formula set
137 forth in Section 7 above.
138 7.05. FIRE DEPARTMENT FUNDS. To facilitate the accounting and reporting of all
139 fire funds, a special Fund of Mound called "Area Fire Service Fund" is created and continued.
140 All operating expenses of the Fire Department are to be paid from this Fund. Other separate Fire
141 Department funds already in existence include, Fire Department Capital Outlay Fund
142 (Equipment Reserve), Firemen's Relief Association Fund, and Fire Truck Bonded Indebtedness
143 Fund. Reports on each of these Funds will be provided annually to each contracting city by
144 Mound as soon as practicable following the end of the contract year. Reports related to these
145 Funds are the responsibility of the Mound Finance Director/Treasurer.
146 7.06. DEFICIENCIES. If any of the above mentioned Funds requires additional funds
147 prior to the next contract year, Mound will notify each contracting city of such shortage in
148 estimated revenue and the contracting cities, by majority of all of the contracting cities, by
149 written notice to Mound, will elect to eliminate the estimated shortfall by the transfer of amounts
150 from the reserve fund or by payment as a part of the current year's quarterly costs set forth in
151 Section 7.
152 Section 8. ARBITRATION. If a contracting city is aggrieved by a determination of
153 Mound as to the allocation of the actual costs of the prior year's service, the contracting city may
154 appeal that determination within 30 days after receipt of Mound's annual audit made pursuant to
155 Section 7.02. The appeal must be made in writing and addressed to Mound asking for arbitration
156 by a Board of Arbitration. The Board of Arbitration consists of three persons: one to be
157 appointed by Mound; one to be appointed by the appealing contracting city; and the third to be
300873v14 DJK MU220-3 7
158 appointed by the two so selected, The name of each arbitrator selected must be submitted, in
159 writing, to the other party. In the event that the two arbitrators so selected do not appoint the
160 third arbitrator within 15 days after their appointment, the Chief Judge of the District Court of
161 Hennepin County has jurisdiction to appoint, upon application of either Mound or the appealing
162 contracting city, the third arbitrator to the Board. The third arbitrator shall not be a resident CH
164 expenses and fees, together with other expenses, not including counsel fees, incurred in the
165 conduct of the arbitration, are to be divided equally between the parties to the arbitration.
166 Arbitration is to be conducted in accordance with the Uniform Arbitration Act, Minnesota
167 Statutes, Chapter 572. The arbitration will be binding on both parties.
168 Section 9. INCREASES IN EXPENDITURES. The contracting cities may be heard
169 regarding any proposed expenditures by Mound that are not in the annual estimated cost budget
170 and that exceed $25,000. Mound shall prepare written notice of such proposed and non-
171 budgeted expenditures to the contracting cities prior to actual expenditures for such items. The
172 contracting cities will thereafter have 30 days in which to approve or disapprove the same in
173 writing. Unless a majority of the Contracting cities disapproves the expenditure, it is agreed that
174 such proposed expenditure may be made and the cost thereof included in the year's budget.
175 Section 10. FIRE DEPARTMENT RELIEF ASSOCIATION. In accordance with the
176 provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 424A and other law, Mound has established a
177 Volunteer Firefighters' Relief Association. The contracting cities agree that it is essential that
178 the firefighters of Mound have a relief association that will provide retirement benefits to
179 compensate the firefighters for the volunteer work hours they contributed. The contracting cities
180 also realize the wisdom of contributing to this fund on a pay -as- you -go basis. The contracting
300873v14 D1K MU220 -3 8
181 cities also recognize that as retirement levels increase that additional contribution will be
182 required beyond the present contribution level. The retirement costs paid to the Relief
183 Association Special Fund is to be considered as a part of the prior years operating costs. The
184 Contracting city will continue to pay contributions at the present contribution level until and
185 unless a majority of the contracting
186 to the Relief Association Special Fund.
187 Section 11. EFFECT OF CANCELATION BY MOUND. If Mound cancels this
188 Agreement under the provisions of Section 6, for reasons other than a breach by the Contracting
189 city, then the Fire Department Capital Outlay Fund established by Mound to purchase capital
190 equipment will be distributed to the Contracting city on the same basis that the Contracting city
191 has contributed to the fund using the factors contained in Exhibit B. This distribution will take
192 place after deducting any existing debt obligations, in the form of bonds, lease purchase, or other
193 Financial obligations that have been used to purchase capital items.
194 Section 12. PRIOR AGREEMENTS. Notwithstanding any language herein to the
195 contrary or the most recent contract between the parties, any credit or debit due to a Contracting
196 city or to Mound because of such most recent contract will be payable in the year following
197 pursuant to the contract currently in force.
198 Section 13. NOTICES. Written notices and communication required to be given under
199 this Agreement are to be in writing and sent by U.S. Mail or fax addressed:
200
If to Mound: City Manager
201
Mound City Hall
202
5341 Maywood Road
203
Mound, MN 55364
204
205
If to Minnetonka Beach: City Administrator
206
Minnetonka Beach City Hall
207
2945 Westwood Road, P.O. Box 146
300873v14 DJK MU220 -3 9
PMA!
225
"Zr
227
228
229
230
231
Minnetonka Beach, MN 55361
Section 14. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Agreement is effective as of January 1,
2010.
Section 15. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement constitutes the entire
Agreement between the parties and supersedes and replaces any prior agreement between the
parties on the same subject.
Section 16. AMENDMENT. This Agreement may be amended only with the written
approval of Mound and each contracting city.
CITY OF SHOREWOOD CITY OF MOUND
By:
Its Mayor
And
By:
City Administrator or City Clerk
300873v14 DJK MU220-3
lul
By:
Its Mayor
And
By:
City Manager
FIRE CONTRACT C ST CALCULATION FORMULA
L ALLOCATION F COSTS. Allocation of contract costs to contracting cities,
are based upon four allocation and fire formula factors.
The factors are; U & V -L, & V -S & F. "these factors are explained and weighted as
described below. The factors are not weighted equally, but together total 100% of the fire
® Utilization of firefighter hours (U) — 20% of the fire service formula and
costs are based upon each contracting city's average percentage of the total firefighter personnel
hours used for the most recent previous three year period.
® Value Land (V -L) — 20% of the fire service formula and costs are based upon
each contracting city's average percent of market valuation of land from the most recent previous
three year period as provided by the Hennepin County Assessor. Each contracting city's market
valuation of land percentage is based upon that city's percent of the total market valuation of all
the land values within the Mound Fire Department service area.
• Value Structure (V -S) — 30% of the fire service formula and costs are based
upon each contracting city's average percent of market value of structures from the most recent
previous three year period as provided by the Hennepin County Assessor. Each contracting
city's market valuation of structure percentage is based upon that city's percent of the total
market valuation of all the structure values within the Mound Fire Department Service Area.
0 Population of City (P) — 30% of the fire service formula and costs are based
upon each contracting city's average percent of total population in the Mound Fire Department
300873v14 DJK MU220 -3 11
service area from the most recent previous three year period. The population figures are to be
provided and certified by each contracting city's city clerk.
II. ALTERNATE FACILITY PAYMENTS COST ALLOCATION. If
contained Payments will be based on the same factors s
averages based on the most recent previous three year period, the average will be based on the
average cost of the Facility Payments for all budget years beginning with 2004.
30087304 DJK MU220 -3 12
��0 U I 1 ACT 10 N F 0 R M
Description/Background/Previous Action
Bonnie Burton, Finance Director, submitted e letter of resignation. Bonnie served in the position oy
Finance Director for the City of Shorewood for the past 10 years. Her last day with the City is May 28,
2010,
1 gave some thought to the needs of the city in this area and believe what we need at this point is a
finance manager/ financial analyst. Financing governmental operations over the next several years
presents several challenges and opportunities and Shorewood needs to prepare for these challenging
times. A financial analyst/manger will fill that need.
| am talking to the City of Excelsior about the possibility nf using their Finance Director during the
recruitment process.
i attached a rough outline of the process for the recruitment.
Recommendation
fe ^
Staff recommends Council accept the resignation and authorize the administrator to �elfig recruitment
to fill the position.
Council Action:
RECRUITMENT PROCESS
I anticipate the finance committee will be involved in the review / interview of the finalists.
— 0 � -.:,rS k U 4 k .k `K.,,s FO RM
Yr-• �' Sa
Department Engineering Council Meeting 05/19/10 Item Number:
From: James Landini, P.E.
As part of the Operating Budget, funds are set aside each year for Bituminous Seal Coating of Streets.
The 2010 budget has $214,400 earmarked for sealcoating.
Streets scheduled for 2010 seal coating are:
Broms Boulevard, Chartwell Hill, Chestnut Court, Chestnut Terrace, Covington Court, Covington Road,
Elbert Point, Mckinley Circle, Muirfield Circle, Near Mountain Boulevard, Old Market Road, Radisson inn
Road, Radisson Road, Shady Hills Alley, Shady Hills Circle, Shady Hills Road, Shady lane, Shore Road,
Sierra Circle, Silver Lake Trail, Sweetwater Circle, Sweetwater Court, Sweetwater Curve, Waterford
Circle, Whitney Circle, Vine Ridge Road, Waterford Court, Wedgewood Drive, Mallard Lane, Teal Circle,
Enchanted Lane, Dellwood Lane, Enchanted Dr, Enchanted Cove, Shady Island Road, Shady Island Cir,
Shady Island Pt, Radisson Entrance Road.
Exhibit A is the Bid Tabulation for the 2010 Seal Coating of Streets Project which were opened
and tabulated on May 19, 2010.
The low bidder is Allied Blacktop Co. in the amount of $164,980.00 for both Cities. Shorewood's
portion of the bid is $124,550.00. Based on the other bid received, it appears that the costs for
this project are reasonable.
Options
1. Approve the resolution entering into a contract for Bituminous Seal coating of Streets in 2010.
2. Direct staff to select different contractor.
3. Do nothing.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends the contract for the 2010 Bituminous Sealcoating be awarded to Allied
Blacktop Co. in the amount of $124,550.00.
A resolution is attached for your consideration.
Council Action:
City of Shorewood
Bid Tabulation
2010 Bituminous Seal Coating of Streets
Shorewood City Project No. 1 ® 07
B ids Opened: 10:00 A. M.
Engineer:
City of Shorewood
19-May-1
id and i
horemrood
o
Bidder
Check (5 %)
Addendum
id
1
Allied Blacktop Co.
X
NA
$124,550.00
$ 164,980.00
2
Pearson Bros., Inc.
X
NA
$127,320.00
$ 168,988.00
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
1
I hereby certify that this tabulation is a correct and
true representation of the bids received on this date
for this Improvement Project
M
.James Landini,
City Engineer
5 -II -1(1)
Date
an Panchyshyn <�
Deputy Clerk/Executive Secretary
Date
Exhibit A
CITY OF SH . REWOOD
RE SOLUTION NO. 10
A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BID AND AWARDING CONTRACT FO
THE 2010 BITUMINOUS SEAL COATING OF STREETS,
CITY PROJECT NO. 10-07
WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for local improvements
designated as the 2010 Bituminous Seal Coating of Streets, City Project No. 10 -07, bids
were received, opened on May 19, 2010 and tabulated according to law, and such
tabulation is attached hereto and made a part hereof as Exhibit A; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that Allied Blacktop Co. is the
lowest bidder in compliance with the specifications.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of
Shorewood as follows:
1. That the Mayor and City Administrator /Clerk are hereby authorized and
directed to enter into a contract with Allied Blacktop Co. in the name of the City of
Shorewood, Project No. 10 -07, according to the plans and specifications therefore
approved by the City Council on file in the office of the City Administrator /Clerk.
2. That the City Administrator /Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to
return forthwith to all bidders the deposits made with their bids, except for the deposits of
the successful bidder and the next two lowest bidders, which shall be retained until a
contract has been signed.
ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD
this 24th day of May, 2010.
Christine Lizee, Mayor
ATTEST:
Brian Heck, City Administrator /Clerk
����.���J[��1 L A��T ` 0 R M
�
Department Engineering Council Meeting 05/19/10 Item Number: ~���m.
From: James Landini P.E.
Item Description: Change Order 1 for the 2010 Street, Drainage, and Utility
Exhibit 4isa change order for the ZO1ONe|dne Drive, K4eadovvvevv Road and Wild Rose Lane Street,
Drainage, and Utility Improvements. City Project No. 10-01, 10-02. Bids were opened and tabulated on
April 7,Z0l0.
The low bidder was VV.M. Mueller & Sons Inc. in the amount of$404,G97.18.K approved the change
order would lower the project bid to $396,565.05.
The change order is requested due to the lack of acquiring easements and to update a
definition in the specifications. An alternate storm sewer route was designed and needs to be
implemented with the change order.
Options
1. Approve the resolution authorizing a change to the contract with W. M. Mueller & Sons, Inc. for
the construction project.
I Do nothing.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of the resolution that approves change order 1 for the 2810
Street, Drainage, And Utility Improvements Project. A resolution is attached for your
Council Action:
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
RE SOLUTION NO. 10-
A RESOLUTION APPROVING A CHANGE ORDER 1
FOR THE 2010 NELSINE DRIVE, MEADOWVIEW ROAD AND WILD ROSE
LANE STREET, DRAINAGE AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS.
CITY PROJECT NO. 10-01, 10-02
WHEREAS, on April 12th, 2010, the City of Shorewood entered into a contract
for construction with W. M. Mueller & Sons, Inc. for the 2010 Street, Drainage, and
Utility Improvements Project, City Project No. 10-01 and 10-02; and
WHEREAS, staff has prepared Change Order I attached hereto as Exhibit A, for
changes to the work specified in the original contract; and
WHEREAS, the Director of Public Works has reviewed said Change Order and
found it to be cost effective for the project.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City of Shorewood to approve
Change Order Number I with W. M. Mueller & Sons, Inc., that incorporates services
outlined in Change Order 1, attached hereto as Exhibit A.
ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Shorewood this 24th day of May,
2010.
ATTEST:
Christine Liz6e, Mayor
Brian Heck, City Administrator/Clerk
CHANG ORDER NO. 1
2010 STREET, DRAINAGE, AND 5110 /2010
UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS
CITY OF SHOREWOOD, MN
TKDA JOB 914536.000
CITY OF SHOREWOOD W. M. MUELLER AND SONS INC.
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD 831 PARK AVENUE P.O. BOX 247
SHOREWOOD, MN 55331 HAMBURG, MN 55339
YOU ARE DIRECTED TO MAKE THE FOLLOWING CHANGES IN THE CONTRACT DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION:
CONTRACT QUANTITIES ARE MODIFIED AS SHOWN ON THE ATTACHED DETAIL.
Storm Sewer Revisions
Contract Definition Revision
IT IS UNDERSTOOD THAT THIS CHANGE ORDER INCLUDES ALL ADDITIONAL COSTS AND TIME EXTENSIONS WHICH ARE IN ANY WAY, SHAPE, OR FORM
ASSOCIATED WITH THE WORK ELEMENTS DESCRIBED ABOVE.
CHANGE IN CONTRACT PRICE:
CHANGE IN CONTRACT TIME:
ORIGINAL CONTRACT PRICE:
$404,697.18
ORIGINAL COMPLETION DATE (SUBSTANTIAL):
6/10/2011
PREVIOUS CHANGE ORDERS: N/A
$0.00
NET CHANGE FROM PREVIOUS CHANGE ORDERS:
NONE
CONTRACT PRICE PRIOR TO THIS CHANGE ORDER:
$404,697.18
COMPLETION DATE PRIOR TO THIS CHANGE ORDER:
6/10/2011
NET INCREASE OF THIS CHANGE ORDER:
- $8,132.13
NET INCREASE OF CHANGE ORDER:
NONE
CONTRACT PRICE WITH ALL APPROVED CHANGE ORDERS:
$396,565.05
COMPLETION DATE WITH APPROVED CHANGE ORDER:
6/10/2011
RECOMMENDED BY: APPROVED BY:
JAMES A. LANDINI, P.E., CITY ENGINEER CONTRACTOR SIGNATURE
CITY OF SHOREWOOD W. M. MUELLER & SONS, INC.
CITY ENGINEER CONTRACTOR
APPROVED BY:
PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR, CITY OF SHOREWOOD CITY ADMINISTRATOR, CITY OF SHOREWOOD
DATE DATE
Charge Order No. 1 Detail
2 REMOVE TREE INCLUDING STUMP (OVER 4 ")
EA
6 (6)
- $
(1,140.00)
3 CLEAR AND GRUB
AC
0.10 (0.10)
0.00 $
(350.00)
4 SEEDING
AC
0.10 (0.01)
0.09 $
(450.00)
5 WOOD FIBER BLANKET
SY
498 (53)
445 $
(84.10)
DIVISION III - STORM SEWER
1 15" RCP CL. 5 STORM SEWER PIPE LF 164 308 472 $ 7,546.00
2 18" RCP CL. 5 STORM SEWER PIPE LF 38 144 182 $ 3,816.00
3 15" HDPE, DR 17 DIPS INSTALLED BY HDD LF 210 (210) 0 $ ( 19,635.00)
4 48" DIAMETER MANHOLE, TYPE 409 EA 1 1 2 $ 1,500.00
DIVISION IV - STREETS & RESTORATION
1 REMOVE & DISPOSE OF EXIST. BITUMINOUS
PAVEMENT, DRIVEWAYS
SY
97.00
33
130 $
107.25
2 CL.5 AGGREGATE BASE, 100% CRUSHED
STONE AGG.
TN
380
12
392 $
168.72
3 SPWEB240B BITUMINOUS WEARING
COURSE, DRIVEWAYS
TN
18
6
24 $
540.00
4 SALVAGE & REINSTALL POST & SIGN
EA
0
2
2 $
150.00
$ (8,132.13)
Article 1— Definitions and Terminology change the language for Engineer from "TKDA, 444
Cedar Street, Suite 1500, Saint Paul, MN 55101 - 2140" to read " Engineer shall mean the City
ENGINEER of the City of Shorewood, or the ENGINEER representing the OWNER on the project."
Page 1
COUNCIL ACTION FORM
Department Council Meeting item Number
Parks May 2, 2010
From, Twila Grout, Administrative Assistant Gate: Mai 19, 2010
Kristi Anderson, Community Rec Resources
At the Park Commission meeting of May 11, the Park Commission reviewed the playground
equipment improvements and recommendations from public works staff. Attachment 1 shows
the items in need of repair or replacement for each park.
Attachment 2 is the quote from Minnesota /Wisconsin Playground for the swing at Freeman
Park South for $672.02, and the quote from Landscape Structures in the amount of $2,929.59
which is for a swing, arch bridge and slide for Manor Park, and a slide and ladder for Freeman
Park North. The total cost to replace the equipment is $3,601.61.
The Park Commission determined that they would wait to order the above Manor Park
improvements until they see if the City is awarded the Hennepin County Youth Sports Grant.
The Rumble and Roll Slide and Spiral Slide at Freeman Park South is on hold. The Park
Commission asked that staff research the life expectancy for the playground structures at
Freeman Park South before determining if they will be replacing these slides.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends that the City Council authorize expenditure of funds in the amount of
$3,601.61 for the playground equipment improvements.
Council Action:
Playground Safety Improvement List 2009/10 (P rovided by Pub lic Wo
a
C�oRo o�
M anor Park: Land Strut /Flagship
Belt Swing
Replace
getting quote
$73.00
Timber Rotten
Replace
completed by PW
done
Arch Bridge
Replace
getting quote
$1,421.50
Warming House Roof
ongoing remodel
Tunnel Slide
Replace
getting quote
$210.40 exit
Freeman Pk So: Gametime
Handicap Swing
Replace
getting quote
476 Game /$456 Midwest
Tube Slide
Bolt
PW Completed
done
Rumble & Roll Slide
Cracked
getting quote
$1,323.00
Volleyball
replace timbers
completed by PW
done
Spiral Slide
replace
getting quote
$4,412.00
Freeman Pk No : Landscape /Flagship
El Tube Slide- Entrance & Exit
holds need
replacing
getting quote
$210.40 exit
Vertical Ladder
protective coat
gone
getting quote
$690.00
Cathcart Pk : Landscape /Flagship
Border
Rotten
PW doing
done
Motorcycle
Tighten
PW doing
done
Hockey Rink
I Replace Gate
PW repairing
doing
f getting replaced
Rumble & Roll Slide Vandalism versi( 1 $1354.49 w /tax /sh
* * *No shoe - horning in of playground pieces - each perimeter was designed to accommodate the
playground installed - Either remove /replace underutillized pieces (Like spring toys)
OR choose proposed pieces and determine radius' needed for perimeter expansions. All parks
surrounded by timers, except Silverwood which is landscape block.
** PRICES DO NOT REFLECT TAX, FREIGHT, OR INSTALLATION 9
(unless noted)
Attachment #1
Minnesota / Wisconsin Playground
�5101 Highway 55, Suite 6000 11GTF
Golden Valley, Minnesota. 55422 93168
Ph. 800-622-54251763-546-7787
Fax 763 =546 -5050 1 info@,ninwiplay.com
05/1 8/2010
Freeman Park Zero G Swing
City of Shorewood Ship To Zip: 55331
Attn: Kristi Anderson
5755 Country Club Road
Shorewood, MN 55331
1 8552 GatneTime - 3 1/2" Zero -G Chair (5- 12) -Gaiv $476.00 $476.00
Chain
- Seat Color- Safety Belt Color-
SubTotal:
$476.00
Tat:
$45.72
Freight:
$150.30
Total Amount:
$672.02
'ibis quotation is subject to polices in the current Gametime Park and Playground catalog and the following terms and conditions. Our quotation
is based on shipment of all items at one time to a single destination, unless noted, and changes are subject to price adjustment. Purchases in
excess of 51,000.00 to be supported by your written purchase order made out to Gametime, c/o Minnesota /Wisconsin Playground.
Pricing: f.o.b. factory, firm for 30 days from date of quotation.
Payment terms: payment in full, net 30 days subject to approval by GameTime Credit Manager. A 1.5% per month finance charge will be
imposed on all past due accounts. Equipment shall be invoiced separately from other services and shall be payable in advance of those services
and project completion. Retainage not accepted.
Order Information:
Bill To:
Company:
Attn:
Address:
City, State, Zip:
Contact:
Tel:
Fax:
Acceptance of quotation:
Accepted By (printed):
Signature:
Title:
Facsimile:
Ship To:
Project Name: _
Attn:
Address:
City, State, Zip:
Contact:
Tel
Fax:
P.O. No:
Date:
Phone:
Purchase Amount: $672.02
Page 1 of 1 Attachment 92
Please remit payment to:
Landscape Structures, Inc. SDS 12 -0395
PO Box 86
Minneapolis, MN 55486 -0395
Date: May 5, 2010
We are pleased to submit this proposal to supply the following items:
QTY
ITEM NO. I DESCRIPTION JUNITVVTj
UNIT PRICE IWEIGHT
EXTENDED AMT
Project
Name: City of Shorewood - Manor Park & Freeman Park
1
Deck Arch Bridge - Hardware Included
246
$1,421.80
246
$
1,421.80
1
Exit 24i Dia Tunnel Slide, Tan
10
$210.40
10
$
210.40
Hardware Included
-
$
-
1
Swing Seat - Hardware Included
3
$73.00
3
$
73.00
1
Exit 24i Dia Tunnel Slide, Red
10
$210.40
10
$
210.40
Hardware Included
-
$
-
1
Custom Permalene Panel Vertical Ladder
50
$690.00
50
$
690.00
Terms —
Net 30 days 1.5% finance charge on remaining
balance
SIGNATURE BELOW ACCEPTING THIS PROPOSAL WILL CONSTITUTE A PURCHASE
ORDER ONLY UPONAPPROVAL BY FLAGSHIP RECREATION, LLC CUSTOMER
Total Weight 319
SUBTOTAL MATERIAL
$
2,605.60
RECEIPT OFAN ORDER ACKNOWLEDGEMENT CONSTITUTES SUCH APPROVAL.
INSTALLATION
Not Included
ACCEPTED BY CUSTOMER DATE
FREIGHT
$135.54
PRINT NAME
SALES TAX
$188.45
PROPOSED BY: DATE
Jennifer Rtre.eter. Flagshin Recreation
TOTAL
$
2,929.59
PRINT NAME
Flagship Recreation, LLC
This proposal is presented by 3980 Zanzibar Lane North Plymouth, MN 55446
flagship (0) 763- 550 -7860 (T) 877- 550 -7860 (F) 763- 550 -7864
recreation Am infoCoNlagshipplay.corn
COUNCIL T LL FORM
Council Meeting
Background / Previous Action
The Occupational Safety and Health Association (OSHA) mandates safety training for all
employees. Each year all employees must be certified in the following areas:
te Employee to Know
Blood Borne Pathogens
o Plan
Beyond the training indicated above, Public Works Personnel are also to be certified annually in
the following areas:
♦ A Workplace Accident and Injury Reduction Program (AWAIR)
♦ Control of Hazardous Energy
♦ Hazard Communications
♦ Recording and Reporting of Injuries and Illnesses
♦ Confined Space Entry /Rescue
♦ Respiratory Protection
♦ Occupational Noise Exposure
♦ Powered Industrial Trucks
♦ Excavations /Trench Safety
♦ Logging Operations
♦ Operation of Mobile Earth Moving Equipment
♦ Personal Protective Equipment
♦ Overhead Cranes
♦ Ergonomics
Safe Assure Inc. has provided these services previously, as a joint project with 11 other lake
area communities. The ability to train with other municipalities provides the opportunity to
train at a cost of approximately one fourth the cost of other programs.
Council Action:
sheets current for every product that is received is an ominous task, at be-2-
|ann also pleased to report that the City's most recent surprise on site inspection by OSHA went
very well. The OSHA inspectors examined many parts of the program and were very satisfied as
to how the program was outlined, and how the program was being implemented.
Attachment 2is the proposal from Safe Assure in the amount of $2,775. This cost is identical to
last year's cost and has been budgeted for in the Public Works Operations Budget.
Staff Recommendation
Staff is recommending approval of a motion accepting the proposal from Safe Assure
Consultants, for an amount not to exceed $2,775.
3M TERIAI SAI Ef I ttA7A S IDE 1 3M T ) Hl h Po�v�r Iira�ke Cleaner; PN 08880 t2/01/2004 1
RM
PRODUCT Power i 088*
I VIAWFACTURER: 3M
Aut
ADDRESS: 3M Center
St. Paul, MN 55144 -1000
EMERGENCY PHONE: 1 -500- 364 -3577 or 651 737 -6501 24 hours
Issue Date: 12/01/2004
Supercedes Date: 12/04/2003
Document Group: 16- 6295 -6
Product Use:
Specific Use: Cleaner for automotive brakes and brake assemblies
k 2�'
D +`
Ineredient
C.A.S. No.
% by Wt
ACETONE
67 -64 -1
30- 60
HYDROTREATED LIGHT NAPHTHA (PETROLEUM)
64742 -49 -0
30- 40
n- HEPTANE (25 - 40 % of 64742 -49 -0)
142 -82 -5
7.5- 16
PROPANE
74 -98 -6
7- 13
METHYL ACETATE
79 -20 -9
3- 7
METHYLCYCLOHEXANE (1.0 - 3.0 % of CAS 64742 -49 -0)
108 -87 -2
0.3- 1.2
Tr
3.1 EMERGENCY OVERVIEW
Specific Physical Form: Aerosol
Odor, Color, Grade: Clear Liquid, Citrus / Acetone Odor, Dispensed as an Aerosol
General Physical Form: Liquid
Immediate health, physical, and environmental hazards: Closed containers exposed to heat from fire may build pressure and
explode. Extremely flammable liquid and vapor. Vapors may travel long distances along the ground or floor to an ignition source and
flash back. Aerosol container contains flammable material under pressure. May be fatal if ingested. May cause target
organ effects.
Yage i of a
ATTACHMENT 1
M I S ET III "I� 5 E 3M(I M II h I��w r rake Cleaner- IAN 08880 12/01 /2004
3.2 POTENTIAL EFFECT
Eye Contact:
Moderate Eye Irritation: Signs/symptoms may include redness, swelling, pain, tearing, and blurred or hazy vision.
Shin Contact:
Mild Skin Irritation: Signs /symptoms may include localized redness, swelling, and itching.
Inhalation:
May be harmful if inhaled.
Intentional concentration and inhalation may be harmful or fatal.
Upper Respiratory Tract Irritation: Signs /symptoms may include cough, sneezing, nasal discharge, headache, hoarseness, and nose
and throat pain.
May be absorbed following inhalation and cause target organ effects.
Ingestion:
May be harmful or fatal if swallowed.
Ingestion may cause:
Gastrointestinal Irritation: Signs /symptoms may include abdominal pain, nausea, diarrhea and vomiting.
May be absorbed following ingestion and cause target organ effects.
Target Organ Effects:
Central Nervous System (CNS) Depression: Signs /symptoms may include headache, dizziness, drowsiness, incoordination, nausea,
slowed reaction time, slurred speech, giddiness, and unconsciousness.
May cause blindness.
Page 2 of 8
3M A SA DATA St ITT 3M( "t1�C} H&h Power Brake Cleaver; PN 0888t1 13l�12/01/2004 M 13 L
If SwRilowed: Do not induce vomiting. Give victim two glasses of water. Never give anything by mouth to an unconscious
person. Get immediate medical attention.
%rr F sue
Autoignition temperature No Data Available
Flash Point -156 OF [Test Method: Tagliabue Closed Cup] [Details:
Based on propellant]
Flammable Limits - LEL No Data Available
Flammable Limits ® UEL No Data Available
OSHA Flammability Classification: Class IIIA Combustible Liquid
5.2 EXTINGUISHING MEDIA
Use fire extinguishers with class B extinguishing agents (e.g., dry chemical, carbon dioxide).
5.3 PROTECTION OF FIREFIGHTERS
Special Fire Fighting Procedures: Water may not effectively extinguish fire; however, it should be used to keep fire- exposed
containers and surfaces cool and prevent explosive rupture. Wear full protective equipment (Bunker Gear) and a self - contained
breathing apparatus (SCBA).
Unusual Fire and Explosion Hazards: Flammable liquid and vapor. Flammable liquefied gas. Closed containers exposed to heat
from fire may build pressure and explode. Vapors may travel long distances along the ground or floor to an ignition source and flash
back. Aerosol container contains flammable material under pressure.
Note: See STABILITY AND REACTIVITY (SECTION 10) for hazardous combustion and thermal decomposition
3
g
Accidental Release Measures: Refer to other sections of this MSDS for information regarding physical and health hazards,
respiratory protection, ventilation, and personal protective equipment. Call 3M -HELPS line (1- 800 - 364 -3577) for more information
on handling and managing the spill. Evacuate unprotected and untrained personnel from hazard area. The spill should be cleaned up
by qualified personnel. Remove all ignition sources such as flames, smoking materials, and electrical spark sources. Use only non -
sparking tools. Ventilate the area with fresh air. For large spill, or spills in confined spaces, provide mechanical ventilation to
disperse or exhaust vapors, in accordance with good industrial hygiene practice. Warning! A motor could be an ignition source and
could cause flammable gases or vapors in the spill area to burn or explode. Contain spill. If possible, seal leaking container. Place
leaking containers in a well- ventilated area, preferably an operating exhaust hood, or if necessary outdoors on an impermeable surface
until appropriate packaging for the leaking container or its contents is available. For larger spills, cover drains and build dikes to
prevent entry into sewer systems or bodies of water. Cover spill area with a fire - extinguishing foam designed for use on solvents,
such as alcohols and acetone, that can dissolve in water. An AR - AFFF type foam is recommended. Working from around the edges
of the spill inward, cover with bentonite, vermiculite, or commercially available inorganic absorbent material. Mix in sufficient
absorbent until it appears dry. Remember, adding an absorbent material does not remove a toxic, corrosivity or flammability hazard.
Collect as much of the spilled material as possible using non - sparking tools. Clean up residue with detergent and water. Collect the
resulting residue containing solution. Place in an approved metal container. Seal the container. Dispose of collected material as soon
as possible.
In the event of a release of this material, the user should determine if the release qualifies as reportable according to
local. state, and federal regulations.
Page 3 of 8
3M MA SAEI T�fi BATA SffEE t t4T(T Hi to Ecarver Brake Cleaner- PN 08880 12/0 1/2004
r �.
7.1 HANDLING
Keep out of the reach of children. Aerosol container contains flammable gas under pressure. Avoid eye contact with vapors, mists,
spray. Avoid breathing of vapors, mists or spray. Do not eat drink or smoke when using this product. Wash exposed areas
thoroughly with soap and water. Avoid static discharge. Do not spray near flames or sources of ignition. Keep away ftorn heat,
s parks , open flame pilot and other sources of i f .. • w hile h this material Do not pierce or b
c ontainer , A _ f oxid
7.2 STORAGE
Store away from areas where product may come into contact with food or pharmaceuticals. Do not store containers on their sides.
Deep container tightly closed. Store away from heat. Store out of direct sunlight. Store away from acids. Store away from oxidizing
agents.
ZYM
ME i
8.1 ENGINEERING CONTROLS
Do not use in a confined area or areas with little or no air movement. Use with functioning spray booth or local exhaust. Use general
dilution ventilation and/or local exhaust ventilation to control airborne exposures to below Occupational Exposure Limits and/or
control mist, vapor, or spray. If ventilation is not adequate, use respiratory protection equipment.
8.2 PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT (PPE)
8.2.1 Eye/Face Protection
Avoid eye contact with vapors, mists, or spray.
The following eye protection(s) are recommended: Safety Glasses with side shields, Indirect Vented Goggles.
8.2.2 Skin Protection
Avoid skin contact. Gloves not normally required.
Select and use gloves and/or protective clothing to prevent skin contact based on the results of an exposure assessment. Consult with
your glove and/or protective clothing manufacturer for selection of appropriate compatible materials.
Gloves made from the following material(s) are recommended: Butyl Rubber.
8.2.3 Respiratory Protection
Avoid breathing of vapors, mists or spray. Under normal use conditions, airborne exposures are not expected to be significant enough
to require respiratory protection.
Select one of the following NIOSH approved respirators based on airborne concentration of contaminants and in accordance with
OSHA regulations: Half facepiece or fullface air - purifying respirator with organic vapor cartridges. Consult the current 3M
Respiratory Selection Guide for additional information or call 1- 800 - 243 -4630 for 3M technical assistance.
8.2.4 Prevention of Swallowing
Do not eat, drink or smoke when using this product. Wash exposed areas thoroughly with soap and water.
8.3 EXPOSURE GUIDELINES
Ingredient
Authori
Tvpe
Limit
Additional Information
ACETONE
ACGIH
TWA
500 ppm
Table A4
ACETONE
ACGIH
STEL
750 ppm
Table A4
ACETONE
OSHA
TWA, Vacated
750 ppm
ACETONE
OSHA
TWA
1000 ppm
Table Z -1
ACETONE
OSHA
STEL, Vacated
1000 ppm
Page 4 of 8
IM TERIAL, SAFETY BATAS T 3M T High Power Brake Cleaner- PN 08880 12/01/2004
IMEMMIM
Substance Condition
Carbon monoxide Not Specified
Carbon dioxide Not Specified
Please contact the address listed on the first page of the MSDS for Toxicological Information on this material and/or its
I
EPA Hazardous Waste Number (RCRA): 13001 (Ignitable), D018 (Benzene)
Since regulations vary, consult applicable regulations or authorities before disposal.
' 1111- - .. M3,77
�g F Jul I " , 117-- 11 k, -
f * - '.- a - - �-- ' — ' —'A— 0
NUNN
I 6- 2
ID Number(s):
60-9800-4496-4, LB-K000-0562-0
rage o of 5
M MA S ASE _ f3A`IA S E °I 3P✓i( 13i h ironer $rake Cleaner- PTA 08880 12/01/2004
n- ANE (25 - 40 % of 64742 -49 -0)
ACGIH
TWA
400 ppm
n- (25 - 40 % of 64742 -49 -0)
ACCrIII
STEL
500 pptn
n- PT (25 - 40 % of 64742 -49 -0)
OSHA
TWA, Vacated
400 ppm
n® PTA (25 - 40 % of 64742-49 -0)
OSHA
TWA
500 ppm
Table Z -I
n- PTA (25 - 40 % of 64742 -49 -0)
OSHA
STEL, Vacated
500 ppm
HYDRO TREATED LIGHT NAPHTHA
CMRG
TWA
50 ppm
(PETROLEUM)
METHYL ACETATE
ACGIH
TWA
200 ppm
METHYL ACETATE
ACGIH
STEL
250 ppm
METHYL ACETATE
OSHA
TWA
200 ppm
Table Z- I A
METHYL ACETATE
OSHA
STEL
250 ppm
Table Z-IA
METHYLCYCLOHE (1.0 - 3.0 %of
ACGIH
TWA
400 ppm
CAS 64742 -49 -0)
METHYLCYCLOHEXANE (1.0 - 3.0 %of
OSHA
TWA, Vacated
400 ppm
CAS 64742 -49 -0)
METHYLCYCLOHEXANE (1.0 - 3.0 % of
OSHA
TWA
500 ppm
Table Z -1
CAS 64742 -49 -0)
PROPANE
ACGIH
TWA
1000 ppm
PROPANE
OSHA
TWA
1000 ppm
Table Z -I
VAC Vacated PEL :Vacated Permissible Exposure Limits
[PEL] are enforced
as the OSHA PEL in some states. Check with your local
regulatory agency.
SOURCE OF EXPOSURE LIMIT DATA:
ACGIH: American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists
CMRG: Chemical Manufacturer Recommended Guideline
OSHA: Occupational Safety and Health Administration
AM: American Industrial Hygiene Association Workplace Environmental Exposure Level (WEEL)
Specific Physical Form:
Odor, Color, Grade:
General Physical Form:
Autoignition temperature
Flash Point
Flammable Limits - LEL
Flammable Limits - UEL
Boiling point
Density
Vapor Density
Vapor Pressure
Specific Gravity
pH
Melting point
Solubility in Water
Evaporation rate
Volatile Organic Compounds
Percent volatile
VOC Less H2O & Exempt Solvents
Viscosity
Aerosol
Clear Liquid, Citrus / Acetone Odor, Dispensed as an Aerosol
Liquid
No Data Available
-156 OF [Test Method: Tagliabue Closed Cup] [Details: Based on
propellant]
No Data Available
No Data Available
No Data Available
No Data Available
No Data Available
No Data Available
0.88 [Ref Std: WATER =11
Not Applicable
Not Applicable
Appreciable
No Data Available
44 % weight [Test Method: calculated per CARB title 21
100 % weight
No Data Available
No Data Available
Page 5 of 8
Please �contW-, �the emc 'oumbers �flsled on the first Wage the MSDS for Transportation Information for this
m ter
at
maial.
3 11
%k-WVj"XM .
W WMAK-j""WIPM
Contact 3M for more information.
311/312 Hazard Categories:
Fire Hazard - Yes Pressure Hazard - No Reactivity Hazard - No Immediate Hazard - Yes Delayed Hazard - N41
This material contains a chemical which requires export notification under TSCA Section 12(b]:
Ingredient (Category if applicable
n-HEPTANE (25 - 40 % of 64742-49-0)
ACETONE
METHYL ACETATE
STATE REGULATIONS
Contact 3M for more information.
CHEMICAL INVENTORIES
Contact 3M for more information.
INTERNATIONAL REGULATIONS
Contact 3M for more information.
WHMIS: Hazardous
C.A.S. No
Regulation
Status
142-82-5
Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) 4 Test
Applicable
Rule Chemicals
67-64-1
Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) 4 Test
Applicable
Rule Chemicals
79-20-9
Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) 4 Test
Applicable
Rule Chemicals
I This MSDS has been prepared to meet the U.S. OSHA Hazard Communication Standard, 29 CFR 19
Nw, t!" =-'� 1 -IN E-' "
2 -
.
4 `11
IM, [ MIL
al
NFPA Hazard Classification
Page 7 of 8
3M �L S FE IIA 1 ET 3M(tI )High P€a as Brake Cleaner- PN 08854 32/{ 1 2004
Health. 2 Flammability 2 Reactivity. 0 Special llazarft None
resconse Versonnel to address the hazards th�
inherent physical and toxic properties Of me maceflai out r
be generated in significant quantities.
Revision Changes:
Section 16: NFPA hazard classification heading was modified.
Section 3: Other potential health effects heading was modified.
Copyright was modified.
Section 8: Exposure guidelines data source legend was modified.
Section 3: Immediate physical hazard(s) was modified.
Section 5: Unusual fire and explosion hazard information was modified.
Section 15: 311/312 hazard categories heading was modified.
Section 15: International regulations information was modified.
Section 15: State regulations information was modified.
Section 15: US federal regulations information was modified.
Section 15: WHMIS regulations information was modified.
Section 10: Hazardous polymerization heading was modified.
Section 15: TSCA section 12[b] text was modified.
Section 3: Other health effects information was modified.
Section 16: NFPA explanation was modified.
Section 15: Inventories information was modified.
Section 12: Ecotoxicological information heading was modified.
Section 12: Chemical fate information heading was modified.
Section 8: Exposure guidelines ingredient information was modified.
Section 8: Exposure guidelines legend was modified.
Section 16: NFPA hazard classification for special hazards was modified.
Section 15: TSCA section 12[b] information was modified.
Section 12: Ecotoxicological phrase was modified.
Section 12: Chemical Fate phrase was modified.
Section 2: Ingredient phrase was added.
DISCLAIMER: The information in this Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) is believed to be correct as of the date issued. 3M
MAKES NO WARRANTIES, EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY IMPLIED WARRANTY
OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR COURSE OF PERFORMANCE OR USAGE OF
TRADE. User is responsible for determining whether the 3M product is fit for a particular purpose and suitable for user's method of
use or application. Given the variety of factors that can affect the use and application of a 3M product, some of which are uniquely
within the user's knowledge and control, it is essential that the user evaluate the 3M product to determine whether it is fit for a
particular purpose and suitable for user's method of use or application.
3M provides information in electronic form as a service to its customers. Due to the remote possibility that electronic transfer may
have resulted in errors, omissions or alterations in this information, 3M makes no representations as to its completeness or accuracy.
In addition, information obtained from a database may not be as current as the information in the MSDS available directly from 3M.
3M MSDSs are available at www.3M.com
-rage 8 of S
T _
"MAY 2010
CONTROL OF HAZARDOUS ENERGY 29 CFR 1910.147 &
AIN Statute 5207.0600
"Procedures shall be developed, documented & utilized for the control of potentially
hazardous energy when employees are engaged in the activities covered by this section ".
HAZARD COMMUNICATIONS 29 CFR 1910.1200 &
MN Statute 5206.0100 thru 5206.1200
"Evaluating the potential hazards of chemicals, and communicating information concerning
hazards and appropriate protective measures to employees may include, but is not limited
to, provision for: development & maintaining a written hazard communication program for
the work place... "
RECORDING AND REPORTING OCCUPATIONAL INJURIES AND ILLNESSES 29
CFR 1904
"Each employer shall maintain in each establishment a log and summary of all
occupational injuries and illnesses for that establishment............ "
L'
v
e
BLOODBORNE PATHOGENS 29 CFR 1910.1030
Each employer having an employee (s) with occupational exposure as defined by paragraph
(b) of this section shall establish a written Exposure Control Plan designed to eliminate or
minimize employee exposure.
POWERED INDUSTRIAL TRUCKS 29 CFR 1910.178
"Only trained and authorized operators shall be permitted to operate a powered industrial
truck. Methods shall be devised to train operators in the safe operation of Powered
Industrial Trucks".
GENERAL DUTY CLAUSE PL91 -596
"Hazardous conditions or practices not covered in an O.S. H.A. Standard may be covered
under section 5(a)(I) of the act, which states: Each employer shall furnish to each of
{their} employees employment and a place of employment which is free from recognized
hazards that are causing or are likely to cause death or serious physical harm to (their)
employees. "
i1
LOGGING OPERATI ®NS 1910.266 (i)(1)
The employer shall provide training for each employee, including supervisors, at no
cost to the employee.
L!
s
�a "_�,
PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT 1926.95 a)
"Application. " Protective equipment, including personal protective equipment for eyes,
face, head, and extremities, protective clothing, respiratory devices, and protective
shields and barriers, shall be provided, used, and maintained in a sanitary and reliable
condition wherever it is necessary by reason of hazards of processes or environment,
chemical hazards, radiological hazards, or mechanical irritants encountered in a
manner capable of causing injury or impairment in the function of any part of the body
through absorption, inhalation or physical contact.
CRANES 1910.279 ° 3
OVERHEAD CRA (�)( )
Periodic inspection. Complete inspections of the crane shall be performed at intervals
as generally defined ned in paragraph (j) (1) (ii) (b) of this section, depending upon its
activity .....................
ERGONOMICS 29 CFR PART 1910.900 THRU 1910.944
"Training required for each employee and their supervisors must address signs and
symptoms of MSD's, MSD hazards and controls used to address MSD hazards. "
F
L
0
0
I
1 4
In the interest of Quality Safety Management, it is recommended that written procedures and documented
employee training also be provided for the following Subparts. (Subparts represent multiple standards)
H"
0
0
L
0
P,
0
El
u
I
I
0
a
Hall-
U
Bloodborne Pathogens
* maintain site specific program
* documented training of all personnel
R
Cranes-Chains-Slings
* maintain site specific program
* documented training of all personnel (inspections)
Hearing Conservation (Occupational Noise Exposure)
• maintain site specific program
• documented training of all personnel
• decibel testing and documentation
Trenching & Excavation (competent person training in second year)
® maintain site specific program
9 documented training of all personnel
Earth Moving Equipment/Motor Vehicles
® maintain site specific program
* documented training of all personnel
Powered Industrial' Trucks/Forklifts
maintain site specific program
documented training of all personnel
testing and licensing
P
U
I
N
0
j
lk
0
I
r 7 i
U -11 ,
H-1-
fl
1
r A
H
I
General Safety Requirements
• maintain site specific program
• documented training of all personnel
The "SafeAssure Advantage"
• On-Line training available for AWAIR, EAP, ERTK, ERGO., Blood Rome
• Safety Committee Advisor
• Employee Safety Progress Analysis
• SafeAssure "Client Discount Card" from "Fastenal Stores or Catalogs"
(15 % off any item)
• Discount on any SafeAssure Services programs
• MSDS on line data base
• Job Hazard Analysis
• Training manual maintenance
• Safety manual maintenance
• Documented decibel testing
• Documented air quality readings-(CO2 testing in shops with 5 or more vehicle
capacity)
• Documented foot-candle readings (if needed)
• OSHA recordkeeping
• General Duty Clause
• Assistance during an actual OSHA inspection
• General safety recommendations
• "ALERT" data base
• Unlimited consulting services
HI
This contract is for the period of twelve months, from May 2010 thro April 2011.
"7?w SafeAssure Add e"
Safe Assure Consultants Inc,
513 5t11 to SW
PO Box 281
Willmar, MN 56201
Bill To
City of Shorewood
5755 Country Club Road
Shorewood MN 55331
Quantity
Safety Training
Description
Date Invoice #
[:S�3/2010 ��268
Due on signing
Rate
Thank you!! Work Safely! I Total $2,775.00
f-N y
COUNuR, ACTION - F -1 0RM
Tad Shaw, Board Representative, Minnetonka Community Education, will be present this evening to
provide his report on recent VICE activities.
Council Action:
W x ACTION FORM
EM
The South Lake- Excelsior Chamber of Commerce has been making plans for the annual 4 th of July community
celebration. Each year they request financial support for this event from the City. Linda Murrell, Director of
the South -Lake Excelsior Chamber of Commerce, will be present this evening to review the event plans and
funding request.
The funds requested by the Chamber are used to offset the costs associated with public safety. In past years,
Shorewood has contributed to this event, and the Council included $2,200 in the 2010 budget for this
purpose.
Options
Staff recommends authorizing the allocation of $2,200 to the South Lake - Excelsior Chamber of Commerce for
the annual Fourth of July community celebration.
Council Action:
Approve $2,200 to the South Lake - Excelsior Chamber of Commerce for the annual Fourth of July community
celebration.
Council Action:
SOUTH d'
We invite your company to become part of the magic in 2010, by adding your
name to the list of select sponsors who make it possible for the Minnesota
Orchestra and the fireworks to be seen, heard and experienced by thousands on
the shores and bays of Lake Minnetonka.
20io Lake Minnetonka 4 th O f J
Celebration Spo isorship
PLA SPONSOR $6,000
Reserved for a sin , Le, corPograte s orgig LLie Ile
L �vy 1� �,, cat - IL
rj L11 be the
Minnesota O.rchestra Concert. While the 0 of July festivities have been held at
Excelsior Commons for 122+ years, the Minnesota Orchestra became part of the
event in 2000. The hour-long concert, which immediately precedes the
fireworks, has become nearly as popular as the fireworks, and is a cherished part
of the Lake Minnetonka 4` of July tradition.
6. Acknowledgement as the Premiere Sponsor at start of M. O. concert to
an in-pa.rk audience estimated at g,000-11,000.
7. Display of your corporate banner on MN Orchestra. Trailer in close
proximity to the concert stage on July 4.
8. Opportunity to display your products/servIces at a tent or table
location in Excelsior Commons 8 a. m. — 9:3 P.M.
90 Reserved. seating & close-in parldng (4 parkirig spots) , if desired, for
the event for up to 20 employees, - friends or associates.
10. "Proud Sponsor of the Iake Minnetonka 0 Of July Celebration"
banner provided for your office location.
1
1., Prominent billing in the official Lake Minnetonka 4� 1 of July Program
in the Lakeshore Weekly News distributed throughout western
suburbs on June 30th. Circulation: 2 5, 000 .
2. Prominent display on Chamber's website advertising Lake Minnetonka 4
of July Celebration, including logo, immediately through Labor Day.
3® Mention in all Chamber-controlled publicity, beginning mid-May.
4. Your nanie listed on promo banner over Water Street, June 21-July 6.
5. Strategic placement of PLATINUM SPONSORLS banner near Main
Stage in Excelsior Commons • July 4 th.
6. Your company name prominently displayed on a Courtesy Golf Cart
driven throughout the event to transport volunteers and guests.
7. Opportunity to display your products or provide promotional giveaways at
event 8 a.m. P.m.
8. Onstage acknowledgement of your company's sponsorship prior to the
start of the Minnesota Orchestra concert.
9. Reserved seating, if desired, at the 4 th of July concert/fireworks show and
"Proud Sponsor of Lake Minnetonka 4th of July Celebration" banner
provided for display at your office location.
4
i. Reserve seating for lo, if requested, during concert/fireworkII
7. Space for your corporate banner along Commons fence-line all day.
8. "Proud Sponsor of the Lake Minnetonka 4th of July Celebration" banner
provided for display at your office location.
i_ Listing as sponsor of Lake Minnetonka 4th of July Celebration Program in
Lakeshore Weekly News, distributed on June 3o around Lake
Minnetonka and western Twin Cities suburbs. Circulation: 2
2. Listing on
at the Excelsior Commons on
July 4 a.m. - 9:30 Pm.
3. Prominent listing on all publicity issued by Chamber including listing on
our website with logo between May 1 7 — Labor Day.
4. Inclusion in all press releases, advertising issued by Chamber in
association with the event.
5. Your company's banner displayed at The Commons throughout the
daylight hours (we will install/take down) -
6. "Proud Sponsor of the Lake Minnetonka 4 th of July Celebration" banner
provided for your office location.
SILVER EVENT SPONSOR $2500
1. Listing in Lake Minnetonka 4 th of July Celebration Program in
Lakeshore Weekly News distributed June 3o around Lake Minnetonka
and western Twin Cities suburbs. Circulation: 2
2. Listing on SHATER. SPONSORS banner at event.
3. Inclusion in Lake Minnetonka 0 1 of July Sponsors Listing on Chamber's
website through Labor Day.
4. Space reserved for your company banner at Commons during event
(banners are removed prior to fireworks for security).
5. "Proud Sponsor of the Lake Minnetonka 4 th of July Celebration" banner
provided for display at your office location.
92000
BRONZESPONSOR
1. Listing in Lake Minnetonka 4th of July Celebration Program in
Lakeshore Weekly News distributed June 3o around Lake Minnetonka
and western Twin Cities suburbs® Circulation: 2
2. Listing on BRONZE SPONSORS banner displayed at the event.
3. Inclusion in Lake Minnetonka 4th of July Sponsors Listing on Chamber's
website through Labor Day and on all press releases.
Space reserved for your company banner at Commons during eveni
(banners are removed prior to fireworks for security).
5. "Proud Sponsor of the Lake Minnetonka 4 of July Celebration" banner
provided for display at your office location.
COPPER SPONSOR, 1-z50
1. Listing in Lake Minnetonka 4 of July Celebration Program in
Lakeshore Weekly News distributed June 3o around Lake
Minnetonka and western Twin Cities suburbs. Circulation: 2
2. Listing SP(')NS0" banner at event.
3. Inclusion in Lake Minnetonka 4 of July Sponsors Listing on Chamber's
website through Labor Day and in all press releases issued by Chamber.
4. Space reserved for your company banner) at Commons during event
(banners are removed prior to fireworks for security).
5. "Proud Sponsor of the Lake Minnetonka 4th of July Celebration" banner
provided for display at your office location.
7
Y
FUND THE
2010.
Families individual donors only. ame listed on Stripes Banner at
Y• p
Excelsior Commons throughout the event at Excelsior Commons, July 4, 2010.
Name listed in official Lake Minnetonka 4th of July program Lakeshore
Weekly News. Donation must be received by June 10, 2010.
h
Individual donors only. Name listed in official Lake Minnetonka 4 t" of July
program, Lakeshore Weekly News. Donation must be received by June 10,
2010 if you wish to be listed in the program.
Citizens A, g 19 A
Individual donors only. Name listed in official Lake Minnetonka 4th of July
program, Lakeshore Weekly News. Donation must be received by June 10,
2010 if you wish to be listed in the program.
All non -cash contributions will be acknowledged by a receipt.
0
RESPONSE F0101 LAKE MINNETONKA
4 TH OF JULY 2010 CELEBRATHON'
For planning & publicity, we need your response as soon as possible so that we may better
coordinate this event. Please select the category and fax or mail to the address below:
2141
: tell us at you can contribute
not later than M i
Ay�
Major Sponsorship Uontrinutionsl c cc
be recei d by jinig
IVC -Is-fbr listing in the Official Program, Please indicate if
you need an invoice.
VISA, Mastercard, Checks accepted. Make payable to South Lake-
Excelsior Cha1 er, P.O. Box 32, Excelsior MN 5533
Company:
Contact Person:
Phone: Email:
Signature:
Date:
Again, thank you for your time and consideration. If you have any questions, please contact
Linda Murrell, July 4 th Fundraising Coordinator, 952-474.646 We'll be in touch.
UP ot o Uelebration
10 Iri., etonKa 4 , July 2-,o,,t
Opportunlitti"iestifor M'ln'l-Spon.sorsh'ip'..','
EVENT _Vqnsore
Li Sand Castle Building Contest
El Fun Run & Kids'Patriotic
Popsicle Party *
Li Kids Face Painting
p.m.
MIT M
LI
Rock 'n'JAZZ
U
❑ 1- 7P-m-
F , Orchestra Hospitality
Please call the Chamber for details.
952-474.646
Excelsior Rotary Club
Knewtson, Health Group
Lifetime Chiropractic
Byerly's of Chanhassen
10
of July M.rectraick,11111"
Firecracker Race Sponsorship is limited to six (6) and is granted on
a first right of refusal basis. Three of the race sponsors— Lake
Minnetonka Orthodontics, Maynard's and Excelsior
Family Dental— have been involved for more than a decade.
Race Sponsorship,
• Name and logo on race shirts distributed to all 1oK
participants (approximately 1,200).
• Name /logo on all race registration forms (mailed to previous
year's participants; distributed to public at local city halls).
• Name /logo on Race Banner, displayed at race finish line.
• Opportunity to distribute free promotional items, coupons,
brochures as long as the sponsor can provide a means of
distribution (staff or volunteers).
To select this category for sponsorship, please refer back
to Page 8 in this packet.
11
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
PARK TOUR & COMMISSION MEETING
TUESDAY, MAY 11, 2010
5755 COUNTRY CLUB RD
SHOREWOOD CITY HALL
7:00 P.M.
I: F
The Commission discussed the potential for placing a synthetic b
Eddy Station and what impact this might have on views.
Anderson pointed out the replacement items from the Public
playground perimeters were designed with the specific play
The Commission acknowledged the removal of the c
proposed batting cage location expansion. They also
fields.
Brown urged the Commission to consider
`finish' the area around the cages with edl
CATHCART PARK:
The Commission ackiia
replace them or remove
pleased with ,low the su
discussed the pla�
BEACH:
Director
BADGER P
In
and noted that the
. e shed and looked at the
on the signs on the fences of the
carefully did insist the little league
olndition of„t�ie rink lights and discussed the need to
The Co "'r lssion looked at the tennis courts and were
3'self,ower the winter. IIn addition, the Commission
�tential for replacing or expanding the playground.
were no changes or comments with regard to the Beach.
It was noted that seven boards on the warming house had been replaced and that the tennis
court overlay had been approved by Council the previous night.
The Commission adjourned to their regular Park Commission Meeting.
1. CONVENE PARK COMMISSION MEETING
Chair Norman convened the regular meeting following the Park Tour at 7:00p.m.
A. Roll Call
Present: Chair Norman; Commissioners Quinlan, Robb, Edmondson, and Gaidos; Public
Works Director Brown; City Council liaison Zerby; and Park Coordinator Anderson
PARK COMMISSION MINU
TUESDAY, MAY 11, 2010
IMAGE 2 OF 2
Absent; Commissioner Trent
B. Review Agenda
Quinlan moved, Robb seconded, approving the agenda as submitted. Motion passed 5/0.
2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. Park Commission Meeting Minutes of April 13, 2010
Robb moved, Quinlan seconded, approving the Minutes of April 13, 2010, as presented.
Motion passed 5/0.
3. MAT'T'ERS FROM THE FLOOR
There were none.
4. REPORTS
A. Report on City Council
Zerby reported that the Council discussed treatment
for seal coating, as well as, the Badger tennis court
B. Review Monthly
Burton)
Director Burton reviewed
explained that the Park fu
5% of the General Fund
Chair Norman pointed out - ithai
He requested that, gg additions'
with the ot�eration' , iicl�et for
C. Update`on Work
aggregate
Report and 20 IP — (Finance Director, Bonnie
monthly ),enditure report and 2010 CIP with the Commission. She
20 deparA6nts which 'make up the General Fund, and accounts for
at the Operation budget is a different fund.
P� ,funds must be applied to infrastructure, improvements to the parks.
&t dituivreoort each month that the Commission also is supplied
.ce each month.
1W
Anderson shared the work program with the Commission acknowledging that all items and tasks seem to
be running on schedule and it cated she would stand for questions.
Chair Norman requested'ih staff include the Manor Park neighbors by keeping the lines of
communication open and sharing with them when the project will break ground.
D. Update on Grant Programs
Anderson reported that the Hennepin County Youth Sports Grant would be before committee in May and
that a decision should be reached by the end of the month. She shared the status of the other grants as
shown on the 2010 Grants table in the packet.
Quinlan asked if staff could continue to apply for the Pepsi Refresh grant.
PARK COMMISSION MINUTES
TUESDAY, MAY 11, 2010
PAGE 3 OF 7
Anderson confirmed that the refresh grants could be applied for continuously but were based on the
numbers of votes received for projects. She encouraged the Commission to cast their votes repeatedly if
staff were to pursue this in the future, as our small population would warrant repeated supporters.
Chair Norman suggested staff continue to research and pursue new grant opportunities and partnerships
with local Target stores for Arts, Education, and Early Childhood Development to offset and enhance
Anderson explained and asked for feedback on the Movie in the
to consider the costs and inclement weather cancellation policy,:
direction on proceeding with the movie program.
Chair Norman noted that the movies tend to start later tl "IV
with the Art center. He suggested the City find a partner to
people to the event.
gram. She urged the Commission
by the vendor. She asked for
lis and are tlie, result of partnerships
the event u1 axz =, fprrt to attract more
.. ____.
Gaidos stated that she would investigate whether she could find a movie permitting provider that might be
more cost effective than the one the Citygiad received a quote' .
Robb asked staff to�verrfy the logistical issues of arringathe movie for completion by l Opm, and/or whether
their equipment was strong enough to offset the issues the sunset might cause.
Zerby statelthatstin et typrcaTl 8 45pm on "August 6"' and further suggested the Commission contact
the high school drama da"`i r rent to see the 'd like to perform.
�s 41n
k
_F. Updated ,outh Tonka Little League Proposed Batting Cages
Anderson reportedghat, to hepknowl edge, the little league had applied for the appropriate permits with the
MCWD and would:be seen- bdfore the Planning Commission at their next meeting followed by the City
Council the end of the crth.
6. DISCUSS PARK TOURS
h1 an effort to keep discussion to a minimum, Chair Norman stated that park items would be
addressed during the CIP discussion that follows. He indicated that, in his opinion, the parks
appeared to be in very good shape with no glaring concerns.
Quinlan interjected that he believed the lights at Cathcart must be addressed this year and added
back into a current CIP. Although he hoped staff could locate a grant to apply for the installation
of a rink at Freeman, he did not believe Cathcart could wait. On the other hand, he believed the
lights could be removed from Cathcart and replaced with ones at Freemen.
PARK COMMISSION MINUTES
TUESDAY, MAY 11, 2010
PAGE 4 OF 7
Brown pointed out that the rink at Cathcart is intensely used by the hockey association and he
wouldn't recommend removing the lights without talking with the group first and deciding which
location they would be most comfortable with. He added that, if the construction at Freeman or
replacement at Cathcart were to happen this year, the Commission would need to act soon.
Robb reminded the Commission that Cathcart Park is a Shorewood Park and the City should
accept that fact and commit to maintaining it. If there is to be a rink, then they need to install and
fix the lights. He believed that, due to the proximity to Shorewood and Highway 7, it is most
frequented by Shorewood residents.
Quinlan concurred, noting that the Commission and City must support Cathcart regardless of
whether it falls within the boundaries of Chanhassen or not. He mah tamed -that the City needs to
get over the fact that Chanhassen does not choose to participate on the improvements,
incorporate it into the City of Shorewood and support it.
Edmondson suggested the City investigate annexing it of revising the boundaries to incorporate
Cathcart Park into the City of Shorewood.
Chair Norman asked whether the Commission might lie to consider redeveloping Cafhcart Park
by relocating the skating rinks to Freeman Park, which`fni ht be beer suited to accommodate it.
He pointed out that if more time was necessary to make a d' cision, he would not feel pressured
to fix the lights, construct a new rink at Freeman, or any of the above. Especially if it added
greatly to public works work load.
Gaidos supported moving skating to
Brown urged the CommisSi6ji td =dot let the dot
rinks require a significant amount of ; staff inve .
amount of time necessary:Eo get the work done
designed for the purpose ofbem.a`'warncung It
indicated that -he. would have staff check the, cc
es hanger their vision for the parks. While
he stated he was more concerned about the
'nowledged that Eddy Station was
spite the additional workload. Brown
of the lights at Cathcart.
7.
Anderson pointed out that the CIP was created with several elements in mind to promote and
challenge d'cussion with regard to improvements at Cathcart Park, updates to Badger warming
house, and tenor court replacement. She noted that the Council had suggested the Commission
review their CIP and, prioritize items in coming years.
Chair Norman noted tkat the way the CIP was set up currently, these reflected all of the priority
one improvements. He urged the Commissioners to take the CIP home with them and dust off
their previous `pie in the sky' wish lists as discussed last fall to insert into the long term CIP and
come back next month to reflect on these further.
Anderson stated that the CIP was accompanied by the Park Inventory and Useful Life estimates
assembled for their review in order to make good decisions about needed improvements in
coming years with regard to playgrounds and park infrastructure.
Brown added that the building inspector has also begun putting together a plan for ongoing
maintenance of Shorewood buildings, parks, and assets.
PARK COMMISSION MINUTES
'TUESDAY, MAY 11, 2010
PAGE 5 OF 7
Robb asked whether the Commission wished to retain the hockey rink or tennis courts at Badger.
Anderson noted that other surface tennis courts and grants could be considered. She also noted
that the Badger rink is highly used. She pointed out that staff did have drawings for a new rink at
Freeman Park which had been used as part of the Hennepin County Youth Sports Grant last
winter,
Brown asked what the Commission felt it gained by moving the tennis court at Badger. He asked
whether the Commission truly could see people coming to City Hall for passive use. He urged
them to consider the highest and best use.
Chair Norman stated that in the grand scheme, Badger had been identifi6 "as the last park they
had envisioned making any significant changes to. He added that the: shelterupdates could be
done at a minimal cost to merely match or coordinate with the ,61 I4a11.campus appearance.
Anderson asked whether the Commission envisioned a new varruing house'o�
Quinlan stated that, to him, it was not a priority to change the courts now. He vle� d the
warming house updates as necessary improvements to give a more campus like fee�bnt not to the
extend we rip out the tennis courts, hockey rink, and warmin -.house�now. He as staff to
._
follow -up with Director Burton on the availability of the TIP Funds for Silverwood park shelter.
Once again, Chair Norman urged the Comt tssioners to give greater thought to the CIP, their
wish lists, and to prioritize those items for the next He ask el; staff to share this direction
with Trent.
8. RENEW PUBLIC V�?.ORKSSTAFF PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT
14 VEMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Anderson reviewedthe,Playground Safety Improvement list with the Commission as provided by
Public Works staff, a164with the accompanying recommendations and quotes for direction.
Robb asked whether these would be viewed as operation and maintenance or CIP items.
Both Anderson and Brown pointed out that these improvements would be viewed as CIP items,
other than the replaced timbers and true maintenance items.
Chair Norman pointed out that the tot addition pieces and improvement pieces would come out
of the $12,000 line item for additional tot pieces. He also noted that the Legion had mentioned
early on that they might be willing to donate a tot piece a year to the parks. He suggested they
wait for Manor Park construction and the award for the Hennepin County Youth Sports Grant to
make a decision.
PARK COMMISSION MINT - TES
TUESDAY, MAY 11, 2010
PAGE 6 OF 7
Gaidos indicated that in view of the costs associated with replacing a few pieces at the
playgrounds versus replacing the entire play structure in a few years, it begs the question,
whether the replacement costs are worth it. She noted that, perhaps, they should challenge the
City to move the playground replacement forward on the CIR
Brown and Anderson acknowledged that these were good questions. Brown asked whether it
would be possible to take out the hazardous pieces altogether, block their access points, and re-
evaluate the playgrounds in general.
replacement Zerby even suggested a different of s
Chair Norman thought we may even wish to move pieces from playgoomid to playground in lieu
of some repairs.
Robb disagreed, stating that pulling an item forward 5 years ti"" spend $50,000 now as opposed to
planning for this expenditure in five years could be detrimental to their budget.
Gaidos asked what the life expectancies were for thlayground fixtures.
e p
Anderson pointed out that the useful life estimates
Quinlan moved, Gaidos seconded, to i*
the proposed replacement items for all'i
undergo an analysis for replacement of
to the City Council the purchase of all of
cs except it' ms ' . over $3,000 each and these
playground structure.
Robb stated that he would prefer they wait
Gaidos suggested
Quinlan amended him
Spiral Slide atfreema
super structures a Gaid
to order
the
Motion
ed 5/0
g but the Rumble and Roll Slide and
ng analysis of life expectancy for the
given wO` are so close to finding out about the grants, lie
VlanouPark pieces until we hear about the grants.
9. EVALUATE NEW O AYGROUND EQUIPMENT ADDITONS/REPLACEMENT
Anderson explained that,:once again, the playground perimeters were designed with the specific
playgrounds in mind anti suggested the Commission consider which playgrounds they wish to
add their chosen proposed tot pieces to and direct staff to go back to determine what implications
this will have a given park playground.
The Commission asked staff to identify what it would cost to add tot pieces to every park
playground.
Anderson urged the Commission to identify two locations and two tot pieces for staff to go back
and obtain more specifics, rather than each and every park.
r Park.
Chair Norman stated that, although Manor would be his first choice, given the potential grant
process he would wait and his next choice would be Freeman Park North and Cathcart.
PARK COMMISSION MINUTES
TUESDAY, MAY 11, 2010
PAGE 7 OF 7
The Commission concurred and directed staff to evaluate adding the 'whirl' piece to Freeman
North first, South if this is an issue, and also the Dinosaur Spring Rider to Cathcart Park.
10. REVIEW REVISED PARK COMMISSION CHAPTER 202 CITY CODE
Chair Norman reported that the Council had asked the Park Commission to adopt the City Coll
items in order to be consistent with what the Planning Commission passed at their last meeting]
Zerby noted that the changes had to do with removals, attendance, etc, pointing out that
Commissioners are appointed by the Council at whim and can be removed by the Council at
whim as well.
Edmondson indicated that he found that this was like o
questioned removal without cause. He pointed out that,
Commissioners who put in the effort, as compared to tf
effort should not feel their position is tenuous.
Chair Norman stated that it is a good thing and reini'
asked that these terms be tightened up. He noted that,
that the Council has always had the ability to remove
Edmondson moved, Gaidos seconded,
City Code, Chapter 202 Park Commis
11. NEW BUSINESS
There was none.
12 ADJOURN
Edmondson Quinlan si
11, 2010 at 9:47p.m.
-ion p
RESPECTFULLY
at whim.
approval,,b,f
the amendments to the
5/0.
i
ed, adjourning the Park Commission Meeting of May
Kristi B. And
Recorder
CITY OF SHORE WOOD
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
TUESDAY, 4 MAY 2010
MINUTES
Chair Geng called the meeting to order at 7:06 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD
7 :00 P..
Present: Chair Geng; Commissioners, Ruoff, Vilett, Davis, Hasek, and Hutchins, Planning Director
Nielsen; and Council Liaison Turgeon
Absent: Commissioner Arnst
APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Director Nielsen requested that Agenda Item No. 3, Mixed -Use Regulations, be postponed until after the
Commission has met with the landowners regarding Smithtown Crossing.
Ruoff moved, Hutchins seconded, Approving the Planning Commission Meeting Agenda of May 4,
2010 as amended to postpone Item No. 3. Motion passed 6/0.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
April 20, 2010
Davis moved, Hasek seconded, Approving the Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of April 20,
2010 as presented. Motion passed 6/0.
1. 7:00 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING — CODE AMENDMENT REGARDING POLITICAL
CAMPAIGN SIGNS
Director Nielsen explained that the State has changed the rules governing campaign signs, and now
allows them to be displayed 46 days prior to the State Primary Election and 10 days following the general
election. The current City Zoning Code states that campaign signs may be permitted 100 days prior to
and 10 days after an election. The new law only effects sign display during a general election campaign
and is considered a housekeeping matter.
Seeing no one present to comment on the matter, Chair Geng opened and closed the Public Testimony
portion of the Public Hearing at 7:10 P.M.
In response to a question from Commission Hasek, Director Nielsen stated that campaign signs are not
allowed on public property, and when on private property with the consent of the property owner, are
subject to a 10 -foot setback from the street surface.
Hasek moved, Vilett seconded, to recommended approval of the Zoning Code Amendment for
Campaign Signs. Motion passed 6/0.
Commissioner Ruoff suggested including a slideshow of photos of commercial business examples.
3. MIXED -USE REGULATIONS
This item was postponed to a later date.
4. DISCUSS LIFE -CYCLE HOUSING
Director Nielsen stated that there are three phases of elderly housing: Independent Living, Care Facilities,
and Assisted Living. He said that the Code does not currently allow senior housing in commercial zoning
districts, but perhaps the Code should allow it in mixed -use development. He said density may not be a factor
for care facilities or assisted living, but for independent senior housing, should the density be allowed higher
than the current 10 units per acre?
Commissioner Davis provided information from the Senior Co -op Housing Federation. She said Minnesota is
the leader in co -op housing and there is still a long waiting list.
Commissioner Hutchins said co -ops are owner- occupied apartments with a Homeowner's Association and
Board of Directors, in -house services such as dining, salons, community rooms, etc. Typically the residents
are still driving their cars, and also need storage room since they are usually down- sizing.
Commissioner Hasek said it sounds like traffic will still be an issue with independent senior housing.
Commissioner Vilett said it would be useful to know what segment of the Shorewood population would stay
in Shorewood if the proper facilities were available.
Director Nielsen said he will try to find traffic studies for the different types of senior housing facilities, as
well as other demographics, in order to consider density allowance.
5. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR
None.
6. NEW BUSINESS
None.
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
4 May 2010
Page 3 of s
7. DRAFT NEXT MEETING AGENDA
The Agenda for the May 18 "' meeting will include a public hearing for new batting cages in Freeman
Park; Smithtown Crossing landowners meeting; discuss mixed -use — time permitting,
8. REPORTS
® Liaison to Council
Commissioner Vilett reported on items discussed and actions taken by the City Council at their meeting
of April 26, 2010, including that the Council did not accept the Commission's recommendation regarding
the final revisions to Chapter 201 (By- laws), nor did they take action on adopting a system for Zoning
Permits.
® SLUC
None.
® Other
None.
9. ADJOURNMENT
Vilett moved, Davis seconded, Adjourning the Planning Commission Meeting of May 4, 2010 at
8:15 P.M. Motion passed 6/0.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,
Patti Helgesen, Recorder
COUNCIL ACTION FORM
Department: Planning Council Meeting: 24 May 2010 Item Number:
From: Brad (Nielsen, Planning Director
Item scri tion Brockwood Final Plat
and development agreement are attached for your review and consideration. The
development agreement addresses the current division and contains language relative to the
future replatting. It is worth noting that City water was determined not to be feasible for this
project. Upon replatting of the larger lot, this issue will be reexamined. It is Mr. Hislop's
intention to build his new home on Lot 2 this summer.
Options
Approve the resolution /development agreement; deny it; or modify it.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of the final plat, subject to payment of park dedication fees, local sanitary
sewer access charges, and the applicant submitting a letter of credit for one and one -half times the
estimated amount of the improvements.
Council Action:
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE FINAL PLAT OF
BROCKWOOD
WHEREAS, the final plat of Brockwood has been submitted in the manner required for the
platting of Iand under the Shorewood City Code and under Chapter 462 of Minnesota Statues, and all
proceedings have been duly had thereunder; and
WHEREAS, said plat is consistent with the Shorewood Comprehensive Plan and the regulations
and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and the City Code of the City of Shorewood; and
WHEREAS, the final plan is consistent with the preliminary plat previously approved for the
project.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Shorewood as
follows:
That the plat of Brockwood is hereby approved.
2. That the approval is specifically conditioned upon the terms and conditions contained in
the Development Agreement for Brockwood, attached hereto and made a part hereof.
3. That the Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized to execute the Certificate of
Approval for the plat and the Development Agreement on behalf of the City Council.
4. That the final plat, together with this Resolution, and the Development Agreement for
Brockwood, attached hereto, shall be filed and recorded within thirty (30) days of the date of certification
of this Resolution.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the execution of the Certificate upon said plat by the
Mayor and City Clerk shall be conclusive, showing a proper compliance therewith by the subdivider and
City officials and shall entitle such plat to be placed on record forthwith without further formality, all in
compliance with Minnesota Statutes and the Shorewood City Code.
ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD this 24th day of May
2010.
Christine Lizee, Mayor
ATTEST:
Brian Heck, City Administrator /Clerk
CITE' OF SHOREWOOD
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
BROCKWOOD
THIS AGREEMENT, made this day of , 2010, by and
between the CITE' OF SHOREWOOD, a Minnesota municipal corporation, hereinafter
referred to as the "City" and BRENT E. HISLDP AND KAREN A. IIISLDP, husband and wife,
hereinafter referred to as the "Developer ".
WHEREAS, the Developer has an interest in certain lands legally described in Exhibit
A, attached hereto and made apart hereof, which Lands are hereinafter referred to as the "Subject
Property "; and
WHEREAS, the Developer has made application under the Shorewood Subdivision
Code for City Council approval of a single- family residential development plat of the Subject
Property, said plat to contain approximately 5.3 acres divided into two lots, and to be known as
Brockwood; and
WHEREAS, the City Council at its meeting on 24 November 2008 approved the
preliminary plat of the Subject Property subject to conditions; and
WHEREAS, the Developer has now submitted its final plat for the development of the
subject property, which plat is attached hereto and made a part hereof as Exhibit B; and
WHEREAS, the City Council by its Resolution No. adopted on 24 May 2010,
has approved the final plat of the Subject Property subject to conditions;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing premises and acceptance
by the City of the final plat of Brockwood, the City and the Developer agree as follows:
1.) Improvements Installed by Developer - Developer agrees at its expense to
construct, install and perform all work and furnish all materials and equipment in connection
with the installation of the following improvements:
(01) All site grading including building pad correction where needed;
(02) Sanitary sewer;
consistent with the plans and specifications prepared by Sathre- Bergquist, Inc., dated 6 May
2010, and received and approved by the City Engineer. Landscaping and reforestation shall be
addressed upon submission of applications for building permits on the two lots.
It is understood that underground utility lines, including gas, electric, telephone, and television
cable shall be installed by the respective private utility companies pursuant to separate
agreements with the Developer.
-I-
It is understood that the improvements installed by the Developer do not include street lighting.
Plans for street lighting shall require separate review and approval by the City Council prior to
installation.
1) Pre - construction Meeting - Prior to the commencement of construction, Developer
or its engineer shall arrange for a pre - construction meeting to be held at Shorewood City Hall.
Such meeting shall be coordinated with the City Engineer and shall include all appropriate
parties specified by the City Engineer.
3.) Standards of Construction - Developer agrees that all of the improvements set
forth in paragraph 1 above, shall equal or exceed City standards, shall be constructed and
installed in accordance with engineering plans and specifications approved by the City Engineer
and the requirements of applicable City ordinances and standards, and that all of said work shall
be subject to final inspection and approval by the City Engineer.
4.) Materials and Labor - All of the materials to be employed in the making of said
improvements and all of the work performed in connection therewith shall be of uniformly good
and workmanlike quality, shall equal or exceed City standards and specifications, and shall be
subject to inspection and approval of the City. In case any materials or labor supplied shall be
rejected by the City as defective or unsuitable, then such rejected materials shall be removed and
replaced with approved materials, and rejected labor shall be done anew to the satisfaction and
approval of the City at the cost and expense of Developer.
5.) Schedule of Work - It is understood and agreed that the work shall be performed
in one phase to be completed by I October 2010. Upon receipt of written notice from the
Developer of the existence of causes over which the Developer has no control, which will delay
the completion of the work, the City, at its discretion, may extend the dates specified for
completion.
6.) Pre - existing Drain Tile All pre - existing drain the disturbed by Developer during
construction shall be restored by Developer.
7.) Staking Surveying and Inspection - It is agreed that the Developer, through its
engineer, shall provide for all staking and surveying for the above - described improvements. In
order to ensure that the completed improvements conform to the approved plans and
specifications, the City will provide for resident inspection as determined necessary by the City
Engineer.
8.) Grading Drainage and Erosion Control - Developer, at its expense, shall provide
grading, drainage and erosion control plans to be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer.
Said plans shall provide for temporary dams, earthwork or such other devices and practices,
including seeding of graded areas, as necessary, to prevent the washing, flooding, sedimentation
and erosion of lands and streets within and outside the plat during all phases of construction.
Developer shall keep all streets within, and adjacent to, the plat free of all dirt and debris
resulting from construction therein by the Developer, its agents or assignees.
-2-
14.) Reimbursement of Costs - The Developer shall reimburse the City for all costs,
including reasonable engineering, legal, planning and administrative expenses incurred by the
City in connection with all matters relating to the administration and enforcement of the within
Agreement and the performance thereof by the Developer. Such reimbursement of costs shall be
made within thirty (30) days of the date of mailing of the City's notice of costs to the address set
forth in paragraph 22 below.
15.) Claims for Work - The Developer or its contractor shall do no work or furnish no
materials not covered by the plans and specifications and special conditions of this Agreement,
for which reimbursement is expected from the City, unless such work is first ordered in writing
by the City Engineer as provided in the specifications. Any such work or materials which may be
done or furnished by the contractor without such written order first being obtained shall be at its
own risk, cost and expense.
16.) Surety for Improvements - Deposit or Letter of Credit - For the purpose of
assuring and guaranteeing to the City that the improvements to be constructed, installed and
furnished by the Developer as set forth in paragraph 1 above, shall be constructed, installed and
furnished according to the terms of this Agreement, and to ensure that the Developer submit to
the City as -built plans as required in paragraph 11. above, and that the Developer pay all claims
for work done and materials and supplies furnished for the performance of this Agreement, the
Developer agrees to furnish to the City either a cash deposit or an irrevocable letter of credit
approved by the City in an amount equal to 150% of the total cost of said Improvements
-3-
21.) Resubdivision As indicated in the preliminary plat for Brockwood, Lot 2 is
capable of being subdivided into four lots. Any such future subdivision shall be done by a formal
platting process, using the Re- Subdivision Plan, attached as Exhibit C hereto as a guide or "ghost
plat ".
22.) Notices - All notices, certificates and other communications hereunder shall be
sufficiently given and shall be deemed given when mailed by certified mail, return receipt
requested, postage prepaid, with proper address as indicated below. The City and the Developer
by written notice given by one to the other, may designate any address or addresses to which
notices, certificates or other communications to them shall be sent when required as
contemplated by this Agreement. Unless otherwise provided by the respective parties, all notices,
certificates and communications to each of them shall be addressed as follows:
-4-
To the City- Zoning Administrator
CITE' OF SHOREWOOD
5755 Country Club Road
Shorewood, Minnesota 55331
To the Developer: Brent Idislop
25625 Birch Bluff Road
Shorewood, Minnesota 55331
23.) Proof of Title - Developer shall furnish a title opinion or title insurance
commitment addressed to the City guaranteeing that Developer is the fee owner or has a legal
right to become fee owner of the Subject Property upon exercise of certain rights and to enter
upon the same for the purpose of developing the property. Developer agrees that in the event
Developer's ownership in the property should change in any fashion, except for the normal
process of marketing lots, prior to the completion of the project and the fulfillment of the
requirements of this Agreement, Developer shall forthwith notify the City of such change in
ownership. Developer fiirther agrees that all utility easements provided to City shall be free and
clear of all liens and encumbrances.
24.) Indemnification - The Developer shall hold the City harmless from and indemnify
the City against any and all liability, damage, loss, and expenses, including but not limited to
reasonable attorneys' fees, arising from or out of the Developer's performance and observance of
any obligations, agreements, or covenants under this Agreement. It is further understood and
agreed that the City, the City Council, and the agents and employees of the City shall not be
personally liable or responsible in any manner to the Developer, the Developer's contractors or
subcontractors, materialmen, laborers, or any other person, firm or corporation whomsoever, for
any debt, claim, demand, damages, actions or causes of action of any kind or character arising out
of or by reason of the execution of this Agreement or the performance and completion of the
work and Improvements hereunder.
25.) Remedies Upon Default -
(01) Assessments In the event the Developer shall default in the performance of any
of the covenants and agreements herein contained and such default shall not have been
cured within thirty (30) days after receipt by the Developer of written notice thereof, the
City may cause any of the improvements described in paragraph 1 above to be
constructed and installed or may take action to cure such other default and may cause the
entire cost thereof, including all reasonable engineering, legal and administrative expense
incurred by the City to be recovered as a special assessment under Minnesota Statutes
Chapter 429, in which case the Developer agrees to pay the entire amount of such
assessment within thirty (30) days after its adoption. Developer further agrees that in the
event of its failure to pay in full any such special assessment within the time prescribed
herein, the City shall have a specific lien on all of Developer's real property within the
Subject Property for any amount so unpaid, and the City shall have the right to foreclose
said lien in the manner prescribed for the foreclosure of mechanic's liens under the laws
of the State of Minnesota. In the event of an emergency, as determined by the City
-5-
Engineer, the notice requirements to the Developer prescribed by Minnesota Statutes
Chapter 429 shall be and hereby are waived in their entirety, and the Developer shall
reimburse the City for any expense incurred by the City in remedying the conditions
creating the emergency.
(02) Performance Guaranty In addition to the foregoing, the City m also institute
legal action against the Developer or utilize any cash deposit made or letter of credit
delivered hereunder, to collect, pay, or reimburse the City for:
(a) The cost of completing the construction of the improvements described in
paragraph 1 above.
(b) The cost of curing any other default by the Developer in the performance
of any of the covenants and agreements contained herein.
(c) The cost of reasonable engineering, legal and administrative expenses
incurred by the City in enforcing and administering this Agreement.
(03) Legal Proceedings In addition to the foregoing, the City may institute any proper
action or proceeding at law or at equity to abate violations of this Agreement, or to
prevent use or occupancy of the proposed dwellings.
26.) Headings - Headings at the beginriing of paragraphs hereof are for convenience of
reference, shall not be considered a part of the text of this Agreement, and shall not influence its
construction.
27.) Severability - In the event any provisions of this Agreement shall be held invalid,
illegal, or unenforceable by any court of competent jurisdiction, such holding shall not invalidate
or render unenforceable any other provision hereof, and the remaining provisions shall not in any
way be affected or impaired thereby.
28.) Execution of Counterparts - This Agreement may be simultaneously executed in
several counterparts, each of which shall be an original, and all of which shall constitute but one
and the same instrument.
29.) Construction - This Agreement shall be construed in accordance with the laws of
the State of Mimlesota.
30.) Successors and Assigns - It is agreed by and between the parties hereto that the
Agreement herein contained shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of their respective
legal representatives, successors, and assigns.
rel
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused these presents to be executed
on the day and year first above written.
DEVELOPER:
Brent E. Hislop, Husband Christine Lizee, Mayor
STATE OF MINNESOTA
ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN
Brian Heck, City Administrator /Clerk
On this day of , 2010, before me, a Notary Public within and
for said County, personally appeared Christine Lizee and Brian Heck, to me personally known,
who, being each by me duly sworn, did say that they are respectively the Mayor and City
Administrator /Clerk of the municipal corporation named in the foregoing instrument, and that
said instrument was signed and sealed on behalf of said corporation by authority of its City
Council, and said Mayor and City Administrator /Clerk acknowledged said instrument to be the
free act and deed of said corporation.
Notary Public
STATE OF MINNESOTA
ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN
On this day of , 2010, before me, within and for said County,
personally appeared Brent E. Hislop and Karen A. Hislop, the Developer, described in and who
executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that it executed the same as its free act and
deed.
Notary Public
THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY:
Shorewood Plamling Department
-7-
All that part of the Southeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 32, Township 117 North, Range 23,
described as follows: Commencing at the Northwest corner of said Southeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of
said Section 32; thence South along the West line of said quarter section a distance of 311 feet; thence East
parallel with the North line of said quarter quarter section a distance of 1052 feet to right of way of the
Minneapolis and St. Louis Railway; thence Northeasterly along said right of way a distance of 345 feet to the
East line of said quarter quarter section; thence North a distance of 92 feet to the Northeast corner of said
quarter quarter section; thence West to beginning, EXCEPT therefrom the following described tract:
Commencing at the Northwest corner of said Southeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4; thence South along the
West line of said quarter quarter section a distance of 120 feet to the actual point of beginning of the tract of
land to be described; thence East parallel with the North line of said quarter quarter section a distance of
513.14 feet; thence South parallel with the West line of said quarter quarter section a distance of 191 feet;
thence West parallel with the North line of said quarter quarter section a distance of 513.14 feet to the West
line of said quarter quarter section; thence North along the West line of said quarter quarter section a distance
of 191 feet to the actual point of beginning.
C.I. DOC, NO.
-{NE PARALEL — TK NORM
LIW M ` E SE /4
OF SEC.32
'F --- - - - - - - - - - - --- ------
33 33T
I
1 :7
�,61
IC
- to g
cj
Lj
LQ
:2 u)
o 4
F '
1 2
40 %
Nj
0"
T" ' t?" 1 : D. I ', 7,
I -CRANAa & UTIUTY EASEMENT
N89 1 0'46'E 53931 /
3931 1 -P
81 ,
1052 (GEED) . . . . .
1052.85 OMEAS) 01�� 411'
0 1 1 %
S 1/4 CORNER OF
k
C L. SEC.32, PAP.117N. RGE.23 If
KENN. CNTY. MON. — —
\,
S. CORNER OF SEC32. 8�21 2640.
T*P I 1111, RIIE,23
V HENN, CNTY. MON.
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS. That Synergy Land Company, LLC, , Minnesota limited liability company and Brent E. Hislop and Karen A. Hislop , husband and wife, fee owners, ofthe following described prope situated in the
State of Minn County of Hennepin, to wit
All that pan of aloe Southeast Quarter of floe Southwest Q ... te—I'Sectim; 32, Township 117 North, Range 23, described as follows: Cominancing at the Northwest comer ofsaid Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Owner orsed Section 32;
the— South along the West line ofsaid quarter section a distance of 311 feet; thence East parallel with the North line ofsaid quarter quarter section a distance of 1052 feet to right ofway ofthe Minneapolis and St. Louis Railway; thence
Northeasterly long said right ofway , distance of 345 feet to the East line ofsaid quartarquentersection; thence Nardi distance of 92 feet to the Northeast comer of said quaver quaver section; thence West to beginning, EXCEPT thenfircon the
following desculoadmact: Commencing at the Northwest come, of said Southeast Quarner ofthe Southwest Quarter: thence South along the West line ofsaid quarter quarter section a distance of 1 20 feet to the actual point of beginning ofthe
tract of land to be described; thence East parallel with the North line of said quarter quarter section a distance of 513.14 feet; thence South parallel with the West line ofsaid quarter quarter section a distance of 191 feet; thence West parallel with
the North Line of said quarter quarter section distance of 513.14 fee to the West line of said quarter yuarter section; thence Nonh along the West line of said quaver quarter section a distance of 191 feet to aloe actual poim oCbeginning.
Has caused the same to be surveyed and platted as BROCKWOOD and does hereby donate and dedicate to the public for public use forever the public ways and the casements far drainage a utility purposes as shown an this plat.
In witness whereof said Synergy Land Company, I.I.C. a Minnesota limited liability company, has caused those presents to be signed by in proper officer this _ day of 2010
By: Synergy Land Company, LLC, , Minnesota limited liability company
By: ChiefManager
Brent E. I lislop
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before nuvdus _ day of 2010, by Brent E. Hislop, Chief Manager, of Synergy Land Company LEE, . Minnesota limited liability company on belialfofthe company.
Notary Public, Hcmupm County, Minnesota Prior Name
My Commission Expires:_
In witness whercofs,id Brent E. Hislop and Karen A. Hislop, have hereunto set their hands this _ day of 2010,
Brent E. Hislop
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this
Notary Public, Hennepin County, Minnesota
My Commission
Karen A Hislop
day of _, 201 by Brent E. Hislop and Karen A. Hislop, husband and wife.
Print Name,
,"', I ""',
if 4ft -',. SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC.
HERa PAP
The west line of the Southeast Quarter ofthe
Southwest Quarter of Section 32, Township
I ITN, Range 23 is . -
assumed haalwarin
.fSO0.04 '24 500`04 "E
I hereby certify that this plat of BROCKWOOD is a correct representation ofthe boundary survey; that all mathematical data and labels are comeativ designated on the plat; that all monuments depicted on the plat have been or will be correctly set
within one year as indicated on the plat; that all water boundaries and wet houls as ofthe date ofthe surveyor's terfifitwout are shown and labeled on the plat; that all public ways are shown and labeled on the plot. I further cenify that this plat was
prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed land surveyor under the laws ofthe State of Minnesota.
David B. Pemberton, Licensed Land Surveyor
Minnesota License No. 40344
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _ day of
2010, by David B. Pemberton, Licensed Land Surveyor, Min License No 40344.
Notary Public, Hennepin County, Minnesota Print Name
My Commission Expires:
SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA
=,,ai
plat of was approved and accepted by the City Council of Shorewood. Minnesota at a regular meeting held this _ day of comments , 2010. If applicable, the wntom comments and
us
deficar, ftha Commissioner of rotation and the County Highway Engineer have been received by the City or the prescribed 30 day period has elapsed without receipt of such comments end recommendations, as pmvidvd by
Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.03, Subdivision 2.
TAXPAYER SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Hennepin Count Minnesota
Mayor By:
City Clark
I hereby certify t noca payable in _ and prior yenrs have been paid for land descri on t his plot. Dared this _ day of_, 21110
Jill L. Alverson. Hennepin County Auditor
By: Deputy
SURVEY DIVISION
Hennepin County, Minnesota
Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 3838565 (1969), this plat has been approved this — day of_, 2010 -
William P. Brawn, Hennepin County Survey.,
By:
COUNTY RECORDER
Hennepin County, Minnesota
I hereby certify that the within plat of BROCKWOOD was recorded in this office this _ day of_, 2010. at — o'clock — .M.
Michael H. Conniff, County Recorder
By: . Deputy
Exhibit B
0 Deron. a 1/2 inch by 14 inch mm pipe set in
ground and marked by License No. 40344
0 Denotes .9 Found lom Monument
@ Denotes Hennepin County Monument
364.03
,"LITY AT�.
1
1 , DrW f�Cf, UoUTY EASrMENIT�
to
6 —al
99
,
Lor
8 .
C;
La
can
0
6,1
af
BLOCK
o
0
0
0
Is
I
I in
'c
in
33
L
33.00
N89
513.14
--LINE PARALEL MTN THE NORTH
0
LINE OF THE SE1/4 OF THE SW1/4
OF SEC.32. TWP.117N, RGE.23
F?
E3
LINE PARALEL NTH THE MST LINE --
1
OF THE SEI/4 OF THE Stn /4 OF
EXCEPTION
SEr-32, TWP.117N. RCE.23 w
iz
0
-{NE PARALEL — TK NORM
LIW M ` E SE /4
OF SEC.32
'F --- - - - - - - - - - - --- ------
33 33T
I
1 :7
�,61
IC
- to g
cj
Lj
LQ
:2 u)
o 4
F '
1 2
40 %
Nj
0"
T" ' t?" 1 : D. I ', 7,
I -CRANAa & UTIUTY EASEMENT
N89 1 0'46'E 53931 /
3931 1 -P
81 ,
1052 (GEED) . . . . .
1052.85 OMEAS) 01�� 411'
0 1 1 %
S 1/4 CORNER OF
k
C L. SEC.32, PAP.117N. RGE.23 If
KENN. CNTY. MON. — —
\,
S. CORNER OF SEC32. 8�21 2640.
T*P I 1111, RIIE,23
V HENN, CNTY. MON.
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS. That Synergy Land Company, LLC, , Minnesota limited liability company and Brent E. Hislop and Karen A. Hislop , husband and wife, fee owners, ofthe following described prope situated in the
State of Minn County of Hennepin, to wit
All that pan of aloe Southeast Quarter of floe Southwest Q ... te—I'Sectim; 32, Township 117 North, Range 23, described as follows: Cominancing at the Northwest comer ofsaid Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Owner orsed Section 32;
the— South along the West line ofsaid quarter section a distance of 311 feet; thence East parallel with the North line ofsaid quarter quarter section a distance of 1052 feet to right ofway ofthe Minneapolis and St. Louis Railway; thence
Northeasterly long said right ofway , distance of 345 feet to the East line ofsaid quartarquentersection; thence Nardi distance of 92 feet to the Northeast comer of said quaver quaver section; thence West to beginning, EXCEPT thenfircon the
following desculoadmact: Commencing at the Northwest come, of said Southeast Quarner ofthe Southwest Quarter: thence South along the West line ofsaid quarter quarter section a distance of 1 20 feet to the actual point of beginning ofthe
tract of land to be described; thence East parallel with the North line of said quarter quarter section a distance of 513.14 feet; thence South parallel with the West line ofsaid quarter quarter section a distance of 191 feet; thence West parallel with
the North Line of said quarter quarter section distance of 513.14 fee to the West line of said quarter yuarter section; thence Nonh along the West line of said quaver quarter section a distance of 191 feet to aloe actual poim oCbeginning.
Has caused the same to be surveyed and platted as BROCKWOOD and does hereby donate and dedicate to the public for public use forever the public ways and the casements far drainage a utility purposes as shown an this plat.
In witness whereof said Synergy Land Company, I.I.C. a Minnesota limited liability company, has caused those presents to be signed by in proper officer this _ day of 2010
By: Synergy Land Company, LLC, , Minnesota limited liability company
By: ChiefManager
Brent E. I lislop
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before nuvdus _ day of 2010, by Brent E. Hislop, Chief Manager, of Synergy Land Company LEE, . Minnesota limited liability company on belialfofthe company.
Notary Public, Hcmupm County, Minnesota Prior Name
My Commission Expires:_
In witness whercofs,id Brent E. Hislop and Karen A. Hislop, have hereunto set their hands this _ day of 2010,
Brent E. Hislop
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this
Notary Public, Hennepin County, Minnesota
My Commission
Karen A Hislop
day of _, 201 by Brent E. Hislop and Karen A. Hislop, husband and wife.
Print Name,
,"', I ""',
if 4ft -',. SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC.
HERa PAP
The west line of the Southeast Quarter ofthe
Southwest Quarter of Section 32, Township
I ITN, Range 23 is . -
assumed haalwarin
.fSO0.04 '24 500`04 "E
I hereby certify that this plat of BROCKWOOD is a correct representation ofthe boundary survey; that all mathematical data and labels are comeativ designated on the plat; that all monuments depicted on the plat have been or will be correctly set
within one year as indicated on the plat; that all water boundaries and wet houls as ofthe date ofthe surveyor's terfifitwout are shown and labeled on the plat; that all public ways are shown and labeled on the plot. I further cenify that this plat was
prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed land surveyor under the laws ofthe State of Minnesota.
David B. Pemberton, Licensed Land Surveyor
Minnesota License No. 40344
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _ day of
2010, by David B. Pemberton, Licensed Land Surveyor, Min License No 40344.
Notary Public, Hennepin County, Minnesota Print Name
My Commission Expires:
SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA
=,,ai
plat of was approved and accepted by the City Council of Shorewood. Minnesota at a regular meeting held this _ day of comments , 2010. If applicable, the wntom comments and
us
deficar, ftha Commissioner of rotation and the County Highway Engineer have been received by the City or the prescribed 30 day period has elapsed without receipt of such comments end recommendations, as pmvidvd by
Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.03, Subdivision 2.
TAXPAYER SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Hennepin Count Minnesota
Mayor By:
City Clark
I hereby certify t noca payable in _ and prior yenrs have been paid for land descri on t his plot. Dared this _ day of_, 21110
Jill L. Alverson. Hennepin County Auditor
By: Deputy
SURVEY DIVISION
Hennepin County, Minnesota
Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 3838565 (1969), this plat has been approved this — day of_, 2010 -
William P. Brawn, Hennepin County Survey.,
By:
COUNTY RECORDER
Hennepin County, Minnesota
I hereby certify that the within plat of BROCKWOOD was recorded in this office this _ day of_, 2010. at — o'clock — .M.
Michael H. Conniff, County Recorder
By: . Deputy
Exhibit B
0 Deron. a 1/2 inch by 14 inch mm pipe set in
ground and marked by License No. 40344
0 Denotes .9 Found lom Monument
@ Denotes Hennepin County Monument
NORTH
60 30 0 30 60 120
SCALE IN FEET
33
/0
14
<
F O F C
CC
BROCKWOOD
"Re-Subdivision Plan"
(for Lot 2, Block I Brockwood)
(Revised-April 14, 20 10)
33 33
BEVERLY
'RN'
, E
S T R A VVB E RRY GARDEN'S
N89'10'46'E 1317.03
C'K DOC, NO
(k:
LIJ G5
NE CORNER OF SEI/4 OF--__1 3;" 25 CTI
T HE .J SWI C :E
TWP
17 d 4 SEC 32 GE23
cii
'27t I V)
895.00
--UNE PARALEL WITH THE NORTH
LINE OF THE SEI/4 OF THE SWI/4
OF SEC.32 TWP.117N, ROE.23
LINE PARALEL WITH THE WEST LINE
OF THE %V OF THE SW1/4 OF
SEC.32, 7N. RrE.23
, "4
-LINE PAR&a MIO! THE NORM
LINE OF THE 5M/4 / OF
'H E SE 144 R
OF SEC.32, TVP. 7N. GF M
L ----- ' - - - - -_
STRA'A'BERRY
k A/ I A
V V I - t -
* 2 ' 1
z
40,106 sq. ft,
47,659 sq. ft.
S
" f\p at 61,702 sq. ft
Gho
4", k
2
Uj
Of
40,737 sq.
4-
ft A I I x
R", E
C4-
I VV, I
s
N89'10'46"E 539.71
1052 (DEED)
1052.9 (STRAWBERRY CIRCLE)
o"
C 1 RC LE
X
S 1/4 CORNER OF
SEC.32, TWP.117N, RGE.23
A 4
0? 0 0 HENN. rNTY. MON.
. 4
V
Note: This Re-Subdivision Plan was required, engineered, and reviewed as
part of the Brockwood Preliminary Plat Approval date November 24, 2008.
• Parcel: Lot 2, Block 1 Brockwood
• Area 231,684 sf (5.32 ac)
• Zoning: Re-Subdivision Plan meets/exceeds R1 -A Code Requirements
• Strawberry Lane ROW granted to City as part of Brockwood Plat
• Please reference attached City Council Minutes dated November 24, 200V
M�rIjbanlkl
Exhibit C
NW CORNER OF SE1 /4
OF THE SW1 /4 OF
SEC.32. TIM .11M
RGE,23
3300
`-)
Mcb3'
�o
43 ,6 80 sq. It
3,&
�2
�
o�
0
BLOCK
oo
0
N.
364.03
N89 513.14
33 33
BEVERLY
'RN'
, E
S T R A VVB E RRY GARDEN'S
N89'10'46'E 1317.03
C'K DOC, NO
(k:
LIJ G5
NE CORNER OF SEI/4 OF--__1 3;" 25 CTI
T HE .J SWI C :E
TWP
17 d 4 SEC 32 GE23
cii
'27t I V)
895.00
--UNE PARALEL WITH THE NORTH
LINE OF THE SEI/4 OF THE SWI/4
OF SEC.32 TWP.117N, ROE.23
LINE PARALEL WITH THE WEST LINE
OF THE %V OF THE SW1/4 OF
SEC.32, 7N. RrE.23
, "4
-LINE PAR&a MIO! THE NORM
LINE OF THE 5M/4 / OF
'H E SE 144 R
OF SEC.32, TVP. 7N. GF M
L ----- ' - - - - -_
STRA'A'BERRY
k A/ I A
V V I - t -
* 2 ' 1
z
40,106 sq. ft,
47,659 sq. ft.
S
" f\p at 61,702 sq. ft
Gho
4", k
2
Uj
Of
40,737 sq.
4-
ft A I I x
R", E
C4-
I VV, I
s
N89'10'46"E 539.71
1052 (DEED)
1052.9 (STRAWBERRY CIRCLE)
o"
C 1 RC LE
X
S 1/4 CORNER OF
SEC.32, TWP.117N, RGE.23
A 4
0? 0 0 HENN. rNTY. MON.
. 4
V
Note: This Re-Subdivision Plan was required, engineered, and reviewed as
part of the Brockwood Preliminary Plat Approval date November 24, 2008.
• Parcel: Lot 2, Block 1 Brockwood
• Area 231,684 sf (5.32 ac)
• Zoning: Re-Subdivision Plan meets/exceeds R1 -A Code Requirements
• Strawberry Lane ROW granted to City as part of Brockwood Plat
• Please reference attached City Council Minutes dated November 24, 200V
M�rIjbanlkl
Exhibit C
COUNCIL ACTION FORM
��
Department: Planning Council Meeting 24K1ay2OIO |temmNuOnber: ~�~�
From: Brad Nielsen, Planning Director
Item Description: Zoning Amendment — Campaign Signs
The State has changed the rules with respect tD when campaign signs may be displayed ina
general election year. It now allows signs to be displayed 46 days prior to the primary and lO
days after the general election. A draft Zoning Code amendment to that effect is attached for
your consideration. The proposed changes are shown with additions being underlined and
deletions shown with strikeouts. The Planning Commission voted unanimously torecommend
the amendment. It should be noted that the City Attorney advised some additional changes to
the amendment (shown in yellow high|ight\. Apparently vvedo not get to control the number
or size of campaign and noncommercial speech signs during the campaign season. Fortunately,
we still have a say about the location (no campaign signs on public property).
Abide by the State law; ignore the new law; or defy the new law.
Staff Recommendat
Staff strongly recommends that we abide by the law change and amend our Code. The City Attorney's
revisions should be referred to the Planning Commission for their information
Council Action:
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 1200 . THE SHOREWOOD
CITY CODE (ZONING) REGARDING CAMPAIGN SIGNS
Section 1. Section 1201.03 Subd. l l.b.(1)(d) of the Shorewood City Code is hereby
amended to read as follows:
Section 2. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon publishing in the Official
Newspaper of the City of Shorewood.
of May, 2010.
CHRISTINE LIZEE, MAYOR
ATTEST:
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
ORDINANCE NO —
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING C APTE 1200 OFT E SHOREWOOD
CITY CODE (ZONING) REGARDING CAMPAIGN SIGNS
Section 1. Section 1201.03 Subd. 11.b.(l)(d) of the Shorewood City Code is Hereby
amended to read as follows:
"(d) Every campaign sign must contain the name and address of persons responsible for
the sign, and that person shall be responsible for its removal. Signs shall be permitted on each lot for
a period of 100 days prior to and ten days after an election. All campaign signs or other
noncommercial speech signs may be posted from 46 days before the state primary in a state general
election year until ten days following the state general election, pursuant to Mimlesota Statutes
211B.045. Signs posted both during and after this time period are subject to all other applicable
requirements in this subdivision. At any time, the City shall have the right to remove signs that are
prohibited under this subdivision and assess a fee as provided from time to time by ordinance.
Campaign signs or other noncommercial speech signs shall not be located closer than ten feet from
any street surface and shall not be placed in front of any property without the consent of the property
owner.
Section 2. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon publishing in the Official
Newspaper of the City of Shorewood.
ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD this 24th day
of May, 2010.
CHRISTINE LIZEE, MAYOR
ATTEST:
BRIAN HECK, CITY ADMINISTRATOR/CLERK
i i
COUNCIL ACTION FORM
Department: Planning Council Meeting: 24 May 2010 Item Number: 8C
From: Brad Nielsen, Planning Director
Item Description: Comprehensive Plan — Final Draft
•=
Direct staff to prepare a resolution adopting the final draft of the 2009 Comprehensive Plan
Update; suggest changes/edits.
Staff Recommendation
The changes made in response to Met Council comments have been previously forwarded to
you for review as they were being submitted. It is hoped that the Council would direct staff to
prepare a resolution of adoption.
Council Action:
Natural Resources - Cha ter Outline
Introduction. ____~____...... --- ...... ----
........... .......... ~ ....... — ......... —'NTl-}
Goaland Objectipem—. ........ _......... ............ .......
--............. .----.---..... NR-3
Issues ....... . .......... ........ ........ .... . ... ..... . ............
^`~....... . ......... .......... ..--'0X-5
Policies ........ ...... --- ....... ~ ........... ............ ..........
............ ~......... ............ .—..... ND-7
Natural Resources Plan ....... ......................................
........... ~........ ............ .... 'NUR-g
Soils--------------------------------------NR
Slopes................................................................................................................
N{l-4
Tree Preservation/Reforestation -----------------------.NR-l0
Wetlands.........................................................................................................
NR- l|
Surface Water Quality ----------------------------.NIl
Shorclaodaand Flood Plains ...........................................................................
NR-15
AizaudNoimePollotioo ---------------------------.
NIl-16
Chapter Summary __________________----_----------'y4R-l7
Introduction
Substantial progress has been made in recent years to
reduce environmental problems related to Lake
Minnetonka. Problems the area is to face in the future are
far more difficult to resolve. Reducing the amount of
pollution caused by storm water runoff, for example, will
be a difficult problem.
Shorewood has gone far in preserving its wetlands, having
adopted protective regulations in the early 1970's. These
rules have been updated to include the provisions of the
Wetland Conservation Act (WCA). The City has also
adopted regulations protecting natural buffers adjacent to
wetlands and establishing building setbacks from these
buffers.
Proper attention to sensitive features such as wetlands,
shorelands, flood plains and wooded areas is recognized as
having aesthetic, economic, health and even psychological
benefits to the community as a whole.
5 -09 NR -1
Natural ources
Goal and Objectives
Natural Resources Goal
The City will establish guidelines and adopt regulations to
ensure preservation and protection of the natural
environment.
Development which occurs is to be compatible with
features of natural environment and preserve
environmental features and natural amenities.
2. The natural and aesthetic quality of Shorewood's
Lakeshore is to be maintained and where feasible
improved.
Creative development design to ensure the
protection and enhancement of those portions of the
community containing unique physical features (e.g.
topography, woodlands, etc.) is to be encouraged.
4. Natural wildlife habitats are to be provided
protection to ensure against loss.
The enviromliental balance between natural and
man -made physical features is to be maintained
through proper land use development policy.
6. Shorewood's trees and vegetation are valuable assets
and consideration is to be given to their preservation
and protection.
7. All environrnentally sensitive areas (e.g. wetlands,
shorelands and floodplains) are to be protected.
Area lakes' ecological systems are to be conserved
and protected for future generations.
9. Where feasible, control over natural open space
areas shall be obtained through conservation
easements, acquisition or development regulation.
5 -09 NR -3
Natural SO f cS
There are several areas with slopes in excess of 12 percent.
Of special concern is development on slopes adjacent to
water bodies. When vegetation is not replaced following
grading, clearing and construction activities, sedimentation
may occur in lakes and streams. City policies establishing a
maximum slope of 3:1 for disturbed slopes in new
development will be formalized.
Tree Preservation /Reforestation
Virtually any development, regardless of size, can result in
the destruction of natural vegetation. Shorewood
recognizes the scenic, environmental and even economic
value of preserving its wooded areas. While some loss of
vegetation may be unavoidable as undeveloped land is
converted to its ultimate use, efforts will be made to
preserve existing trees where possible and to replace trees
where necessary.
Certain types of vegetation (e.g. buckthorn) have proven to
be undesirable, often times choking out trees and other
native vegetation. The City has begun an educational
program to identify sources of undesirable plants, advising
property owners of ways to eradicate invasives, and even
providing tools that can be borrowed from the City by
homeowners.
Wetlands
A substantial portion of Shorewood consists of marshes,
wet basins and wet flats. These marsh areas must be
5 -09 NR -5
protected because they play an important role in the storm drainage system, as well as providing
habitat for wildlife. Shorewood has made substantial progress in the protection of wetlands, as it
passed its first Wetlands Ordinance in 1970. These rules have been updated to address the
requirements of the Wetland Conservation Act of 1991..
Water Resources
Inasmuch as Shorewood borders on the southern shore of Lake Minnetonka and contains six
other lakes within its boundaries, surface water management is a critical issue. Although in the
past, the discharge of sewage effluent into Lance Minnetonka was the primary contributor to poor
water quality, this practice has been curtailed and storm drainage is the largest source of water
pollution. Where past storm water control efforts concentrated on the quantity of water, there is
increasing concern over the quality of water which fords its way into wetlands and lakes. The
adoption of National Urban Runoff Program (NURP) standards is viewed as one measure to
improve surface water quality.
The City has recently updated its Surface Water Management Plan. The goals and policies of
that plan shall be integrated into Shorewood's Comprehensive Plan and its development review
process.
Non - native aquatic species such as Eurasian Water Milfoil, Purple Loostrife and Zebra Mussels
are increasingly choking out lakes and wetlands, raising concerns over the effectiveness of
current control efforts.
Air and Noise Pollution
Due to the lack of industrial operations or heavy vehicular traffic, air and noise pollution have
not been identified as a problem in Shorewood. Although traffic volumes have been increasing
on Highway 7, part of which runs through Shorewood, noise levels are still within State
guidelines. The lack of significant air and noise pollution is a positive environmental factor in
Shorewood. Efforts will be made to maintain this quality.
Wildlife
Over the years, Shorewood has prided itself on its protection of natural resources, one of the
results of which is the preservation of natural habitat for wildlife. Approaching full
development, the City now fords itself in a position of managing wildlife in order to avoid
conflicts with human activities and minimize property damage by animals that are not subject to
natural predation. A deer management program was initiated for 2007 and 2008. The
effectiveness of the program will be analyzed upon receipt of updated deer counts in 2010.
5 -09 NR -6
Natural so s
Policies
All development in naturally or environmentally
sensitive areas shall conform to local, metropolitan
and state regulations.
2. Environmental regulations shall be formulated,
updated and enforced to ensure the proper
protection of natural environmental resources.
3. Environmental assessment worksheets and, when
required, enviromnental impact statements, shall be
prepared for developments of the type described in
Minnesota Environmental Quality Board's
Environmental Review Program, as may be
amended.
4. The location, condition and species of existing
vegetation shall be indicated in all development
requests.
The use of planned unit development cluster
concepts shall be considered where protection of
natural features is important to the community.
6. New development and the expansion of existing
activities shall be restricted and regulated where
environmental damage may result.
7. Development on or near shorelands, wetlands, flood
plains and other natural features which perform
important environmental functions in their natural
state shall be restricted or prohibited.
8. Natural drainage patterns shall be preserved
whenever feasible.
9. Development on, or alteration of, natural drainage
system components shall be restricted so that the
need for construction of storm sewer will be
minimized.
5 -09 NR -7
10. Any adverse impact from increased surface water runoff to adjoining properties shall be
prohibited.
11. A drainage plan shall be established which utilizes intermediate ponding areas and
provides municipal procedures for the acquisition, dedication, or control of areas so
designated.
17. State and federal environmental regulations shall be incorporated into local policy.
18. All reasonable measures shall be taken to mitigate adverse impacts resulting from
development on natural wildlife habitats.
19. Programs designed to protect Shorewood's trees through disease control measures and
reforestation shall be encouraged.
20. Protect surface and ground water quality by establishing programs to educate the public
and regulate the use of chemical lawn fertilizers.
21. Preserve existing wooded areas and develop programs and regulations to replace lost tree
cover.
22. Incorporate the goals and policies of the Shorewood Surface Water Management Plan
into the development review process.
23. Prepare and maintain a natural resources inventory for the City of Shorewood, including a
listing of sources for environmental data.
5 -09 NR -8
Natural Resources
Plan
Bearing capacity for construction has been, and continues
to be, an area of concern. The City will not hesitate to
require testing in areas blown for poor soil conditions or
where poor soils are discovered during construction. Areas
found to have questionable soils will be subject to the
recommendations of qualified soils engineers, as well as the
requirements of the State Building Code.
In addition to reevaluating the threshold at which filling or
excavating require special approvals, standards will be
adopted for the control of erosion and sedimentation. In
this regard the Hennepin Conservation District has prepared
an Erosion and Sediment Control Manual which will serve
as a guide for the development of Shorewood's own local
controls.
Slopes
The type of slopes, along with surficial soil types, should be
taken into consideration in the review of all development
requests. Each site should be examined for problems of
this nature, and in identified problem areas, the City
Engineer should test soils to determine if soil types are a
problem on lesser slopes.
The Metropolitan Council has established two policies
relative to development on erodible slopes;
5 -09 NR -9
Slopes which because of their surficial soil type are susceptible to severe erosion should be
maintained in a natural state. Counties and municipalities should adopt: regulations to
maintain or replace vegetative cover of these slopes to reduce erosion and slippage.
Slopes subject to moderate erosion should be managed to minimize erosion and slippage;
management may include special design and construction methods for development or
appropriated vegetative or other cover.
In light of the amount of sloping land in Shorewood, 12 percent grade will be considered a
' °warning flag ". While development may be allowed on slopes greater than 12 percent, such
development shall be subjected to special scrutiny and examined for any potential environmental
impact which might occur as a result of the proposed development. The City shall evaluate
grading activities based on the following criteria:
Development on slopes greater than 12 percent must be reviewed and approved by the City
Engineer.
® On large projects development activities shall be conducted and staged to minimize soil
erosion. The smallest practical increment of land shall be developed at any one time; that
increment shall be subjected to erosion for the shortest period of time, not to exceed a single
construction season.
• Sufficient control measures and retention facilities shall be put in place prior to
commencement of each development increment to limit soil loss.
• During construction, wetlands and other water bodies shall not be used as sediment traps.
• Except in extraordinary situations, development which results in disturbed slopes exceeding
3:1 (three horizontal to one vertical) shall not be allowed. Where unavoidable, steeper slopes
must be designed by qualified professionals and will be subject to review and approval by the
City Engineer.
Tree Preservation and Reforestation
Shorewood's zoning regulations contain provisions for limiting the removal of vegetation in
shoreland areas and requirements for landscaping of certain new developments. The City has
adopted a tree preservation and reforestation policy which establishes a three -part program:
Preservation
® identifies which developments require tree preservation
• identifies size and species of trees to be saved
• adopts construction protection measures
* considers residential clustering to preserve trees
5 -09 NR -10
1 Replacement
requires replacement of those trees identified for preservation which must be removed
for road and buildings
a establishes a required ratio between removed and replacement trees
During the development process developers are required to submit tree inventories, from which
tree preservation and replacement plans are prepared. In certain instances where it is impractical
or undesirable to replace trees on site, an alternative should be provided that would allow
developers and builders to contribute to a City fund. This fund would be used for placing trees
on public property (e.g. City parks).
Wetlands
Shorewood adopted wetland protection regulations in the early 1970's. As illustrated on the map
on page NR -13, nearly 10 percent (3 12 acres) of Shorewood's total land area exists as designated
wetlands. Also, the City has begun enforcing the no- net -loss requirements of the Wetland
Conservation Act of 1991 (WCA91). In 2007, the Riley- Purgatory -Bluff Creek Watershed
District elected not to be the LGU (local governing unit) for purposes of administering the
WCA91. Subsequently, Shorewood entered into a cooperative agreement with the Minnehaha
Creek Watershed District to provide permitting services for the entire city.
Numerous steps have been taken to enhance Shorewood's wetland protection program:
Adoption of the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources wetland classification
system.
2. Requirement that all development proposals locate, identify and classify both City -
designated wetlands and WCA91 wetlands.
Wetland delineations must be prepared by qualified professionals approved by the
Watershed Districts.
4. The Minnehaha Creek Watershed Districts will be the Local Governing Unit (LGU) for
administering the standards of the WCA91.
5 -09 NR -11
The City will continue to work with the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District and the
Department of Natural Resources to enforce wetland protection laws.
6. The City has established minimum setbacks for construction adjacent to wetlands.
Shorewood's wetland regulations have been revised to include a 35 -foot natural buffer
adjacent to wetlands in new development, plus a 15-foot building setback from the
natural buffer area.
1. Requirement of retention ponds upstream of wetlands to collect and filter pollutants in
storm water runoff before it reaches the wetlands.
Surface Water Quality
No point sources of water pollution have been identified in Shorewood. A more generalized
problem is surface runoff and runoff from storm drainage systems, which have resulted in high
levels of phosphorus in some small lakes. Phosphorus is one of the major plant nutrients
required for plant growth and the eutrophication process, which is the process by which a lake
ages and fills with algae and weeds. The major sources of phosphorus are surface runoff and
effluent from the liners.
In Shorewood, Silver Lake, Galpin Lake and Lake William have all been affected by high levels
of phosphorus. This is because these lakes capture a major portion of storm drainage waters.
Christmas Lake, on the other hand, has excellent water quality and low phosphorus levels. One
reason for this is that Silver Lake catches most of the storm water runoff and therefore serves as a
settling basin for pollutants. Phosphorus levels in Lake Minnetonka are also a cause for concern,
although a number of methods are being considered by DNR and the Mimlehaha Creek
Watershed District (MCWD) to reduce this form of pollution at its source.
Within its jurisdiction, the MCWD reviews all development proposals for more than one single -
family dwelling for their impact on the storm water drainage system and water quality. A
number of measures are now required in order to reduce the pollution from storm waters:
Install catch basins and oil skimmers in storm drainage systems.
2. Control the rate of storm water runoff.
3. Place rock rip -rap (a material used to prevent shore erosion) at storm water outlets,
subject to the following restrictions:
• The rip -rap shore protection shall consist of natural rock only
• The rip -rap shore protection shall conform to the natural aligmnent of the shore
• The minimum finished slope shall be no steeper than three feet horizontal to one foot
vertical (3:1)
• No materials shall be placed more than five feet waterward of the ordinary high water
level
5 -09 NR -12
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
0�
Ci G LAKE MINNETONKA
I SHADY ISLAND PT CITY OF ORONO
2 SIWDV ISLA D7R
3 SHADY ISLAND CIR
_.._.._.._.._.._.._
. .. •MD CITY OF SHOR
4 MAPLE IS EWOOD 0 j
3 SHADY
�- SHADY ISLAND RD m
Of y
PHELPS BAY
j z LAKE MINNETONKA z I O
LA-N�
LL
5
{ W O i Q
rc - vuGr �s.w
U `U
UPPER LAKE MINNETONKA
E.CHWiEDiS
LAKE MINNETONKA @ airaDGE m RCHA
CIR 1
®CBNDOD RD CR
l - NCRTHGATE _ -
C V CI
CIR
L/ OR
Q i O RAE LA
B y
0 _ _ �
W WOODSIDE RD
W'
Z
I Iu EN g m 1.MAR8H o A
N 1 p i2 WRSF{POlQE
W! • O f SMITHTOWN wSMITHTOIM�
LL A = O SMRHTCI M N11Y
Y
0 LA
L)
� A 1 � s RRY Gr
U j U CT MANN L+
LAKE MINNETO
RIDGE
® LA
a�u w
STRA�hBERRY
BEVERLY DR � IR �
! x N dV45 DR
j SMITHTOWN BA 9 CITY OF SHORE
CITY OF CHANHAS,"-N I
' 0 1,000 2,000 4,000
iiii Feet
' Shorewood Planning Department
05/10
I GDEC
x
STAR
P
0
�Oz Q�S�
of •��°
G� i 0
1 '� •• GIDEON'S BAY
! _ aia iSUND %
FRIG i5ur,p �•
r
G
SPRUCE NLL I �
C RAMPART a 1
CT
< Q
LAKE MINNEWASHTA State M
. ) 12 410.
City Designated Wetland
Shoreland Protection Zone
(1000' from lakeshore)
F i
Uc �
I I
I i
1 �
Q
CITY OF GREENWOOD
EXCELSIOR BAY ST ALBANS BAY
1D1
RD P
CHRISTMAS LAKE
I
S OF SH C
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
NR -13
/ r 3 4
S ILV 4
5
e 4•
A� I
! _ 6 7
I CHESTNUT TER
2 YN9TNEY OR
3 ELBERT PT
4 WKINLEY PL
5 CHESTNUT CT
B. "'"LEEY CT
7 WKINLEY CIR
Wetlands and
Shorelands
0
i LU
2 2 SPRING 50
w
Z
z
1
0
0
boo
U
U
RILLS
R+enCIR
o
0
vAT `
O
/ r 3 4
S ILV 4
5
e 4•
A� I
! _ 6 7
I CHESTNUT TER
2 YN9TNEY OR
3 ELBERT PT
4 WKINLEY PL
5 CHESTNUT CT
B. "'"LEEY CT
7 WKINLEY CIR
Wetlands and
Shorelands
Numerous goals and detailed policies relative to stormwater runoff have been set forth in
Shorewood's Surface Water Management Plan and in the Stormwater Pollution Protection flan
(SWPPP) recently adopted by the City. These plans are hereby adopted by reference into this
Comprehensive Plan and will be an. integral element in the review of development proposals.
The City will continue to work with the Watershed Districts and the Department of Natural
Resources to address the spread of Eurasion Water Milfoil, Purple Loostrife and other invasives
that choke out lakes and wetlands. While these problems are best handled on a regional level,
the City can contribute by continued educational efforts aimed at preventing the spread of these
nuisances.
As the "green movement" has increasingly gained momentum across the country, local efforts
have also benefited from the national attention. As part of the SWPPP, Shorewood has
committed to conducting educational programs relative to stormwater runoff. Recent seminars
sponsored by the City, including such topics as natural landscaping and the use of rain gardens,
have been well received by residents. These local educational programs should be continued,
expanded and publicized.
Shorelands and Flood Prins
Shorewood first adopted shoreland regulations consistent with Department of Natural Resources
standards in 1985. In 1992 the Shoreland Zoning District was amended to reflect recent changes
in state guidelines. Land within 1000 feet of lakes or 300 feet from Purgatory Creek (see the map
on page NR -13) have been included in a shoreland overlay zoning district which imposes
shoreland requirements in addition to the underlying zoning requirements. These water bodies
have been classified by the Department of Natural Resources as Natural Environment (NE),
Recreational Development (RD), or General Development (GD), based upon their development
characteristics. Lake Minnetonka, Lake William, Galpin Lake, and Purgatory Creek are all
classified GD. The remaining lakes are classified RD with the exception of Silver Lake which
has a NE classification.
Having been among the first of the Lake Minnetonka communities to adopt shoreland
regulations, Shorewood is committed to keeping the shoreland areas as natural as possible.
Development in the "S" District is closely monitored for compliance with site alteration
requirements, hard cover restrictions and building setbacks.
5 -09 NR -15
Shorewood's flood plain regulations date back to 1979. These rules are intended to protect life as
well as property in areas which are subject to periodic flooding. Shorewood's code has been
updated to reflect recent changes in federal requirements. In the event the federal Emergency
Management Agency (f1JMA) proposes a flood insurance restudy, the City should ask that
Christmas Lake be included on the flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM).
Air and poise Pollution
The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency sets the standards for permissible levels of noise and
air pollution. The only source of noise or air quality problems in Shorewood is vehicular traffic.
Recorded levels have not exceeded state or federal standards.
Air quality standards as set by the State of Minnesota are more restrictive in several cases than
federal standards. Two sets of standards have been adopted. The "primary standards" are those
ambient air quality levels necessary to protect public health with an adequate margin of safety.
Secondary standards refer to those ambient air quality levels necessary to protect public welfare,
such as prevention of air pollution damage to crops, natural vegetation, materials and structures.
State standards for noise levels suggest that decibel measures of 65 dBA are the point at which
action may be taken to reduce noise. No permit system has been established to control noise
resulting from existing or future sources. While the State has in the past installed noise berms on
Interstate highways with high noise levels, a moratorium has been placed on further construction
of such items. Noise berms have not been used to control levels on State or County roads.
Although the sources of noise and air pollution in Shorewood are limited, the City does regulate
these pollutants through adoption of Minnesota Pollution Control Agency standards by reference
in the zoning ordinance.
5 -09 NR -16
Chapter Summary
Shorewood is committed to all efforts at maintaining the
high quality of its natural environment. The City's goal in
this regard is:
preservation to ensure and protection of the natural
Although Shorewood has in the past made considerable
progress in natural resource protection, certain elements are
in need of attention. This chapter contains objectives and
policies which are incorporated into the following summary
of recommendations:
Soil conditions will be taken into consideration in
all types of development proposals.
2. Ordinances incorporating Hennepin Conservation
District standards related to filling, grading and
excavating will be enforced.
The City has adopted standards regulating
development on steep slopes. For example, grading
or construction which results in disturbed slopes of
3:1 (three horizontal to one vertical) shall be
restricted.
4. In order to limit the loss of vegetation the City will
require tree preservation and replacement and site
landscaping for all developments.
The requirements of the Wetland Conservation Act
will continue to be actively enforced.
6. A 35 -foot buffer shall be required adjacent to all
wetlands in new developments. A 15 -foot building
setback from the natural buffer shall be required.
7. New developments will be required to construct
sedimentation ponds designed to National Urban
Runoff Program (NURP) standards.
5 -09 NR -17
Shorewood will continue and expand its environmental educational programs, such as
buckthorn removal, raingardening and recycling.
9. Shoreood's shoreland regulations will continue to be enforced in order to preserve and
restore the natural character of area lakes.
10. Shorewood's flood plain regulations will be updated to reflect changes in federal
requirements.
5 -09 NR -18
Laud Use Plan - Chonter Outline
......... LU -1
......................... ............................... LU -3
... ......... ............ ............................ —. LU -5
......................... ............................... LU -7
....................... ............................... LU -11
....................... ............................... LU -1.9
....................... ............................... LU -19
Undeveloped Open Space
Low Density Residential
Low to Medium Density Residential
Medium Density Residential
High Density Residential
Semipublic
Public
Commercial
Land Use /Zoning Changes ............................................... ...............................
LU -26
LandSubdivision ............................................................. ...............................
LU -27
Housing Variety /Affordability ......................................... ...............................
LU -27
LakeAccess ..................................................................... ...............................
LU -28
HistoricPreservation .............................................................. ..........................LU
-28
Solar Access Protection ..................................... ..........................LU
-29
Population and Household Projections Based Upon Land Use Plan ..............LU
-29
ChapterSummary ...................................................................... ...............................
LU -33
11/09
I ntroduction
The Land Use Plan is formulated to show logical
relationships between a variety of major land use types,
including residential, public, semipublic, commercial, and
undeveloped open space. Location of various land uses is a
result of applying the general planning concepts and the
specific policies contained in the Policy Plan. For the most
part, land use patterns have been well established, and it is
the City's intention to use the existing Zoning Districts map
as a guide for future development. In deciding the amount
which is desired of each land use type, several factors have
been considered:
Community Function. The primary role of
Shorewood in the metropolitan area has been
identified as provision of housing. As such,
planning must be geared toward providing a quality
living environment with adequate supportive
services (i.e. park and recreational facilities,
neighborhood convenience commercial areas, etc.).
2. Community Character. Shorewood's current
character is primarily single family residential.
Shorewood will strive to maintain its character.
3. Housing. Current residential development in
Shorewood consists mainly of single family units.
Few new housing units are available to young
singles, newly married couples or the elderly. As
land becomes increasingly scarce, market forces
often conflict with what would be considered
affordable housing by metropolitan area standards.
Given Shorewood's desire to maintain its low
11/09 LU -1
density residential character, the Land Use Plan attempts to preserve the con -11 un ty's
present variety of housing stock.
11/09 LU -2
Land Use
Goals and Objectives
Land Use Goals
The City shall establish a pattern of land uses which is
consistent with the residential and recreational functions of
the community.
The land use plan shall promote harmonious relationships
between various land uses (e.g. homes, commercial outlets,
churches, parks, schools, etc.) through proper development
and locational planning.
Through land use planning discourage land uses which are
inconsistent with the residential and natural character of the
community.
The City shall promote safe, healthy and affordable housing
options.
Land Use Objectives
A cohesive land use pattern that ensures
compatibility and functional relationships among
activities is to be formulated and implemented.
2. Community planning and development is to
consider the surrounding neighbors, neighborhoods
and cities.
Development that is not accompanied by a
sufficient level of supportive services and facilities
(utilities, parking, access, etc.) is to be prevented.
4. Land uses and environmental quality are to be
maintained and where necessary upgraded.
Property values are to be protected.
6. Community development is to be compatible with
features of the natural environment and is to be
accommodated without destroying environmental
features and natural amenities.
11/09 LU -3
%. Individual neighborhoods are to be maintained and where necessary, strengthened in
character, while at the same time improving and reinforcing community identity.
8, A creative approach to the use of land and related residential development is to be
encouraged.
9. Commercial development shall be safe, convenient, attractive, and compatible with the
residential character of the community.
10. Establish and maintain a consistent approach to the development of fragmented land
parcels (i.e. larger Lots having the potential to be subdivided) which encourages
cooperation between landowners and provides for access and utility service which
complies with City standards.
11. Identify parcels of land with the potential to be set aside as permanent open space and
explore means of obtaining conservation easements or financing the acquisition of such
parcels.
11/09 LU -4
Issues
Undeveloped /Underdeveloped Land
A limited number of vacant parcels remain to be developed
in Shorewood. Despite land use patterns having been
relatively well established, issues will undoubtedly arise
concerning intensity, compatibility and environmental
impact. It is not necessary for all land to be developed.
More challenging than developing the remaining large
parcels is coordinating the development of small parcels to
avoid the adverse effects of piece -meal subdivision.
Discrepancies Between Land Use Plan and Existing
Zoning
The Comprehensive Plan prepared in 1981 resulted in the
rezoning of several areas within the community, primarily
to snake zoning consistent with existing development.
Other areas have been rezoned over the years to be
consistent with the previous Land Use Plan. Today, the
Proposed Land Use Plan and the Shorewood Zoning
Districts map are in synch.
Housing Variety /Affordability
Shorewood has served, over a long period of time, as a
residential community with the tradition of single - family
homes. While some variety of cost and lot sizes has been
achieved over the past several years, the limited amount of
land remaining in the community, combined with high land
values, presents little opportunity for the development of
housing that is affordable by metropolitan area standards.
As such, it is important that the City explore ways to
preserve its present stock of affordable housing.
In the 1990's Shorewood updated its zoning regulations
relative to senior housing, allowing higher densities for
projects specifically designed and occupied by seniors.
Two housing projects, Shorewood Ponds and The Seasons,
were able to take advantage of the revised regulations and
were successful in providing 86 independent living units
for seniors. The City's efforts to date have focused on
11/09 LU -5
independent living for seniors, but do not address later phases of the life cycle of housing —
assisted luring and care facilities.
As a result of the 1981 Comprehensive Plan, two lake access issues were addressed. The City
conducted a. study relative to the use of existing fire lanes, which concluded with a decision to
keep, but regulate, fire lanes for neighborhood use. Secondly, the City adopted regulations
pertaining to existing marinas.
Several years ago, the LMCD and the DNR agreed upon a goal of locating i parking spaces
associated s Lake Minnetonka. - _ o of
Beach, s fee free parking spaces associated - Minnetonka in
Shorewood. Shorewood has provided a minimum number of parking spaces on Christmas Lake.
Redevelopment
As undeveloped land becomes scarce in Shorewood, the City is increasingly confronted with
proposals to redevelop existing properties. In some cases, property owners have joined together
to combine existing home sites which are then resubdivided by a developer. More often, smaller,
older homes are being replaced by larger, more expensive homes. In both cases, concern has
been raised for maintaining the character of existing neighborhoods.
Four areas of particular concern have been identified: 1) the Minnetonka Country Club; 2)
Howard's Point Marina; 3) the commercial areas abutting County Road 19; and 4) the
nonresidential uses that currently exist in the east end of Planning District 6. The City has
attempted to maintain a dialog with the golf course ownership with respect to the long -term
viability of the course. Despite updates to Shorewood's zoning regulations favoring
improvements to the marina, land speculators continue to inquire about its redevelopment. It is
worth noting that both of these properties are zoned for large lot, single- family residential use.
The commercial properties abutting County Road 19 appear prime for redevelopment and the
City has begun to be approached by prospective developers.
11/09 LU -6
The community shall be planned and developed in
units as determined by either physical barriers
and /or homogeneous land use characteristics.
2. Whenever possible, the impact of physical barriers
shall be reduced in order to increase relationships
between isolated areas and reinforce continuity and
a sense of community.
3. Major streets are to border, not penetrate,
neighborhoods.
4. Land use development shall be planned to prevent
competition of a detrimental type.
All development proposals shall be analyzed on an
individual basis from a physical, economic and
social standpoint to determine the most appropriate
uses within the context of the planning district in
which it is located and within the community as a
whole.
6. Land use development shall be related to and reflect
transportation needs, desired development and
community priorities.
7. Land use development shall be planned so as not to
isolate or create landlocked parcels.
8. The use of easements for the purpose of access is to
be discouraged.
9. "Back lot" development shall not be permitted.
Adequate access must be established and provided
to avoid creating nonconforming property.
10. Intensification of land use activity and development
will only be allowed if accompanied by sufficient
corresponding increases in related supportive and
service facilities such as parks, off - street parking,
-C- re and police protection, etc.
11/09 LU -7
11. Transitions between distinctly differing types of land uses shall be accomplished in an
orderly fashion which does not create a negative (economic, social or physical) impact on
adjoining developments.
11 Wherever possible, changes in types of land use shall occur either at center, mid -block
points so that similar uses front on the same street, or at borders of areas separated by
major manmade or natural barriers.
13. The removal of land from the tax rolls shall be considered only when it can be clearly
demonstrated that such removal is in the public interest (e.g. the preservation of
greenspace).
14. Programs and incentives for continuing privately initiated maintenance, improvements for
energy conservation, and redevelopment of existing land use development shall be
created and implemented.
15. Where practical, problems with conflicting and non - complementary uses shall be
resolved through removal and relocation.
16. Sufficient setback requirements for new development along major streets shall be
established to prevent future problems of street upgrading (e.g. widening).
17. To the maximum extent possible, development policies and regulations shall be applied
consistently and uniformly.
18. Shorewood's land planning and development shall be on a cooperative basis with
neighboring communities, when consistent with Shorewood's adopted goals.
19. Shorewood's lakeshore shall be protected from over - intensification of use and
development.
Residential
Residential neighborhoods shall be planned and developed according to established
planning district boundaries.
2. Low density residential neighborhoods shall be protected from encroachment or intrusion
of high use types and by adequate buffering and separation from other residential as well
as non - residential use categories.
Residential neighborhoods shall be protected from penetration by through traffic.
4. Access to major streets shall be provided on the periphery of residential neighborhoods.
Owner occupied housing shall be encouraged.
11/09 LU -8
6. residential development shall be protected Born adverse environmental impacts,
including noise, air and visual pollution.
A variety of housing shall be maintained.
Housing styles and development techniques that conserve land and increase energy
efficiency shall be encouraged.
9. Overall density shall be a primary consideration in planning for the community.
10. Density and lot size shall be the primary considerations in the review of development
requests.
11. All new housing shall adhere to the highest community design, planning and construction
standards.
12. Innovation in subdivision design and housing development shall be considered through
the use of devices such as the cluster and planned unit development concepts.
13. Residential development shall be prohibited on flood plains and other natural features
that perform important protection functions in their natural state.
14. New residential development shall maintain the natural enviromnental character of
Shorewood.
15. Integration of housing types or styles within a development shall be allowed when
applicable as long as the total number of units conforms to the prescribed density for the
total development.
16. Medium density housing shall be concentrated and allowed in those portions of the
community where adequate supportive facilities (high capacity streets, utilities, etc.) are
existing, service needs are minimized, and where work and leisure time activities are
directly accessible.
17. Medium density housing shall not be utilized specifically as a buffer or viewed as being
capable of absorbing negative impacts.
18. Medium density housing shall be developed only in relation to and support of major
commercial and service centers.
19. Shorewood's housing planning and development shall be in cooperation with neighboring
south shore communities.
Commercial
The City of Shorewood's commercial development shall be oriented towards
"convenience" type of shopping geared toward neighborhood or community scale
markets.
11/09 LU -9
1 C orrnnercial and service centers shall be developed as cohesive, highly interrelated units
with adequate off- street parking.
3, Existing and proposed service and commercial uses shall be adequately and appropriately
Landscaped according to community requirements as may be amended.
4. All existing and proposed service and commercial uses shall be adequately screened or
buffered from any adjacent residential development.
Orderly transitions between commercial and residential areas shall be established and
maintained.
6. Uncoordinated linear commercial development shall be strongly discouraged in favor of a
unified development pattern.
7. Joint utilization of parking, access, and other related supportive services shall be
promoted in service and commercial districts and individual developments.
8. Safe and convenient pedestrian movement shall be provided within service and
commercial developments.
9. When possible or when opportunities arise, major street access for service and
commercial development shall be at the periphery of the area.
10. Locate neighborhood convenience centers along minor arterial or major collector streets.
11. Commercial development at street intersections shall be limited and restricted.
Development of one quadrant does not indicate or dictate commercial use of the
remaining quadrants.
12. Ensure that neighborhood convenience centers are provided with safe and convenient
accessibility for both motorists and pedestrians.
13. It shall be the responsibility of existing commercial developments to assume the burden
of making necessary improvements to insure compatibility with surrounding residential
uses.
Commercial Service
The existing commercial service development in Shorewood shall be upgraded and
improved to the highest possible standards of operation.
2. It shall be the responsibility of existing commercial service developments to assume the
burden of making necessary improvements to ensure compatibility with surrounding
residential uses.
11/09 LU -10
Concept Plan
The primary function of Shorewood is the provision of
housing and a leisure time environment. The function of
most adjacent lakeshore communities is similar, making it
somewhat difficult to differentiate between one community
and another. In addition to the similarity in basic function,
irregular boundaries and geographic configuration
compound the difficulty of identifying each individual
community. The absence of a "traditional downtown" in
Shorewood contributes to a lack of identity.
Shorewood has adopted as one of its goals establishing an
identity and sense of community. For the purpose of this
report, a community is defined as an entity possessing a
common likeness or character. Since the basic character of
Shorewood is that of a residential community, it is essential
that each residential neighborhood be maintained as a unit
with a sense of continuity and focus. Moreover, as certain
supportive services and facilities are required in order for a
residential community to function properly and adequately,
nonresidential uses should be likewise maintained. In other
words, proper attention to each constituent part of the
community is essential to the establishment of an identity
or sense of community.
Relative to the function and goals of the community, the
overall plan concept for the City of Shorewood is the
development of the community on a district or
neighborhood basis. While a neighborhood can be
11/09 LU -11
considered as much a social entity as a physical area, for planning purposes these neighborhoods
or planning districts have been determined based upon natural divisions and /or physical barriers.
So, for the purpose of this report, neighborhood and planning district may be used
interchangeably. The map on the following page shows Shorewood divided, for planning
purposes, into twelve districts. The District Area Flans are located in the Appendix.
Within the concept of developing the entire community on a unit or district basis, it is important
that individual districts not only have an internal continuity, but also that they relate to one
another. In order to relate neighborhood districts on a community scale, it is recommended that
community focal points be developed (see Concept Sketch Number Two). Typically, a
community would have one central activity center to serve this purpose. However, given the
elongated shape of Shorewood, a multiple nuclei concept is proposed. These focal points already
exist to a certain extent, but planning for the community should recognize and attempt to enhance
these activity centers. The primary commercial focus for the City has been the shopping center at
Lake Linden and Highway 7.
The commercial center should remain easily accessible to all residential districts. The center
should also project a unified image with individual components of the center arranged so as to
create functional and complementary use relationships. Circulation within the core should be, to
the extent possible, largely pedestrian oriented. In order to increase the continuity of the center,
while at the same time increasing pedestrian safety, major traffic flow should be routed around
the periphery of the center, penetrating it as little as possible. Finally, commercial property
maintenance should represent and reflect the vitality and stability of the entire community.
More recently, the commercial areas abutting County Road 19 have come to the forefront. The
County Road 19 Corridor Study, adopted by the City, emphasizes the issue of identity, going so
far as to identify the corner of Smithtown Road and County Road 19 as "Smithtown Crossing ".
Smithtown Crossing is viewed as a significant entry point into the city and efforts to enhance that
identity continue.
The Vine Hill Road /Highway 7 /Waterford commercial area should be considered as another
commercial focal point. Neighborhood and /or convenience type commercial uses should
continue to be encouraged for this area.
11/09 LU -12
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
I
j a�+ard
Gideon
14
St. Albans
,\ Bad
Excelsior
Bay
a cR
_ _Eepewom Rd_
Vft
�` Y ,RUge. � Wblr Wbod .• o
Rd
,
g iw/arsn M Arm Creek - - _ -__ -
- VIr a - ate H�
_
�
a n R St .
- - - - -' -- -p d
S
r
Katlrwen _
eq': � ,. E 3
Ct_ y m O _ _ Y N - te a^+
J
_. SmCrtdwn La _ -- � � Echo E.de
m T graw6e^Y Cr -1 Pant _ so ¢ 'p
v -
Rd V .
- — - - ' Q ai Y' - _can s� ..
m
a e r
e
3 ood� _ o `q v
+- a
p s
• - �'p 5 _ _ 'Mich 'SDOrevN" �ok CQ rn . `Z_ Yflflowsbne Tr $ - R- • „,�, 3 R _ �. _ -
p e
• -_ __ _ -
RW u° Ave -__ -- -_ _._ - - - e � °ad D.. - . o� ;vray sc
m -�
m
Smithtown v Cowe ge p —
ma - '
�:1 ..,Lao _- - ti - - Oak Leaf Tr :+-L` - - - b� - - o - _~ -. 0ord.Pi - --
a •� Y
Bay W d S, U 3 J y � G a` 3 Sl R e -9 °N . -- -- -
— (Lake Virginia) IPrk
2 Pond V� Dr (Lake NI in new ash ta)
N
A
' 0 1.000 2.000 4,000
Feet
Shorewood Planning Department
07/09
-
Ilia�n
,yM, �� -
o- i mp
R° _.
s `
sPr.r9 a _ -
--
aate:d Ar
1J
9
Christmas
c�
Lake Q' - z Ebert P
ke A s
■ ■ 6� 3 Wlmany Ca
4 Cnesbwd TM
5 Chestrka C,
6 Mcb wy C.
Planning Districts
LU -13
I,I:oid z shady wan°
a semy wwrd rr
� Shady waM Cr
Enr ,anrtl
Cove
4
i
Lake Minnetonka
l pper Lake
j a�+ard
Gideon
14
St. Albans
,\ Bad
Excelsior
Bay
a cR
_ _Eepewom Rd_
Vft
�` Y ,RUge. � Wblr Wbod .• o
Rd
,
g iw/arsn M Arm Creek - - _ -__ -
- VIr a - ate H�
_
�
a n R St .
- - - - -' -- -p d
S
r
Katlrwen _
eq': � ,. E 3
Ct_ y m O _ _ Y N - te a^+
J
_. SmCrtdwn La _ -- � � Echo E.de
m T graw6e^Y Cr -1 Pant _ so ¢ 'p
v -
Rd V .
- — - - ' Q ai Y' - _can s� ..
m
a e r
e
3 ood� _ o `q v
+- a
p s
• - �'p 5 _ _ 'Mich 'SDOrevN" �ok CQ rn . `Z_ Yflflowsbne Tr $ - R- • „,�, 3 R _ �. _ -
p e
• -_ __ _ -
RW u° Ave -__ -- -_ _._ - - - e � °ad D.. - . o� ;vray sc
m -�
m
Smithtown v Cowe ge p —
ma - '
�:1 ..,Lao _- - ti - - Oak Leaf Tr :+-L` - - - b� - - o - _~ -. 0ord.Pi - --
a •� Y
Bay W d S, U 3 J y � G a` 3 Sl R e -9 °N . -- -- -
— (Lake Virginia) IPrk
2 Pond V� Dr (Lake NI in new ash ta)
N
A
' 0 1.000 2.000 4,000
Feet
Shorewood Planning Department
07/09
-
Ilia�n
,yM, �� -
o- i mp
R° _.
s `
sPr.r9 a _ -
--
aate:d Ar
1J
9
Christmas
c�
Lake Q' - z Ebert P
ke A s
■ ■ 6� 3 Wlmany Ca
4 Cnesbwd TM
5 Chestrka C,
6 Mcb wy C.
Planning Districts
LU -13
The City Hall and surrounding City property will be considered another community 'local point
and serve as the civic center for Shorewood. Development of this area should be representative
of community attributes and set an example for private development in the community.
Renovation of the Shorewood City Hall is currently underway and demonstrates this
Planned unit development is a concept that has been incorporated into Shorewood's existing
zoning ordinance and utilized to a certain extent in the past. Advantages of planned unit
development are several: 1) the contractual agreement between the developer and the City gives
the City more total control than traditional subdivision; 2) more efficient circulation patterns can
be achieved for a large area than piecemeal development might allow; 3) land use transitions can
occur within the site; and 4) natural features can be preserved by functional clustering of units
and/or uses. Applicants for P.U.D. must provide clear and convincing evidence demonstrating
that the use of P.U.D. meets the City's criteria, and that the use of P.U.D. would provide benefit
to the City over traditional zoning requirements. The primary advantage of this zoning tool, and
the reason it may be suitable for Shorewood, is that it encourages preservation of natural features,
such as wooded areas and wetlands, while still allowing efficient and economically advantageous
use of land.
11/09 LU-15
Concept 1
Low density residential
Medium density residential
Commercial activity centers
Focus point
Major traffic carriers
b
Q Cc mmu n i t-//ne ig hbo rhood
I I>
Focus
Neighborhood Focus
•• •• =�
Community
focus
• ME• =
LU-16
Neighbcrfccd Focus
Concept 3
r`•, m a:
Open space
Ems'°
mmerciaE activity center
Major erarrsc
° 1 carriers
Land use transition
RIN
L, and Use
Plan
Land Use Classifications
Undeveloped Open Space. Based upon the assumption that
all buildable land in Shorewood will eventually be
developed in one fashion or another, this category consists
primarily of wetlands. These areas are indicated on the
Land Use Plan map as designated wetlands, and are taken
from the official Shorewood wetlands map. These areas are
scattered throughout the community and range in size from
small potholes to the very large tracts of land found near
Howard's Point Road and east of Christmas Lake.
Protection of these natural areas is considered important,
both in terms of Shorewood's natural drainage system and
retention of community aesthetics.
As undeveloped land in Shorewood becomes more scarce,
there is increasing interest in preserving at least some of it
as permanent open space. Metro Greenprint, a publication
sponsored by the Mimlesota Department of Natural
Resources, provides an overview of programs available to
communities interested in the preservation of open space.
With these and other programs in mind, the City
established the Land Conservation and Enviromnent
Committee (LCEC) in 1999 to prepare a conservation plan
for the community. The results of the committee's work
are found in the Conservation Open Space Plan for the City
of Shorewood, dated March 2003. The study concluded
that, given the high cost of remaining land in Shorewood,
the focus of the City's efforts should be acquisition of
conservation easements versus outright purchase of land.
11/09 LU -19
Minimum De zlsit Residential. While the City has recognized a need for providing areas that
allow a somewhat higher density than one -acre lots, there is still a market for large lots. The
areas indicated on the Land Use Plan map consist of land where such development is already
prevalent. Overall density is proposed at .I to I unit per acre. Most of the areas proposed as
minimum density are adjacent to natural areas such as lakes or wetlands. In this regard, the City
must ensure that any changes in density to surrounding areas have a minimum of impact on the
lower intensity use.
Low Density Residential. This land use basically consists of single family residential at a density
of I to 2 units per acre. Most of the area designated as low density residential is already zoned
for this type of development.
Low to Medium Density Residential. This category of land use is provided to allow residential
development at a density of 2 to 3 units per acre. This density begins to allow a greater variety of
housing types. Small lot single family residential, double bungalows, and medium density
townhouse development may be permitted in these areas.
Residential development at this density is viewed as serving two purposes: 1) proper location
creates a transitional area between lower density residential uses and higher intensity uses such as
commercial (see concept plan), and 2) applies the concept of locating a greater density of
population nearer to activity centers and major traffic carriers.
Medium Density Residential. At 3 to 6 units per acre, this is the highest density residential use
proposed for the City of Shorewood. Types of housing allowed in these areas would include
medium density townhouse development and potentially small -scale apartment or condominium
units.
The areas proposed for medium density residential are relatively limited in area and number so as
to have a minimum effect on the overall density of the community. These areas include primarily
the properties immediately adjacent to the existing commercial uses. Once again the concepts of
land use transition and higher density near activity centers have been applied.
Semipublic. This land use type includes churches, cemeteries, the Xcel property on County Road
19, and the largest area designated semipublic - the country club and golf course located near the
center of the community. All areas so designated on the Land Use Plan map are already in
existence. No new areas are proposed for semipublic use nor are any existing semipublic uses
proposed to be eliminated.
Public. This classification includes all existing public buildings, schools, parks and recreational
facilities in the community. It should be noted that the Chicago and Northwestern rail right-of-
way has been acquired by the Hennepin County Regional Railroad Authority for possible
extension of light rail transit. Since light rail is not anticipated in the foreseeable future, the
right -of -way will continue to be used for trail purposes.
11/09 LU -20
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
(ioow "34
►�j,,�
I
I� Lake Minnetonka
l pper Lake
11 Ind
NMI
i
Smithtown
Bay
St. Albans
Bay
Excelsior
Bay
Christmas
Lake
4f►� �• gum
k
Bill
lop
z ►���
2 Ebert Pt
Existing
Land Use 2008
N
' 0 1,000 2,000 4,000
Feet
Shorew000d Planning Department
12/08
0 Undeveloped _ Public
Single - Family Residential Semi - Public
Two - Family Residential _ commercial
_ Multiple - Family Residential
LU -21
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
5
co..ym. ce
3EpnR
�'/M—Y Cv
CMw, Tin S CM— CY
6 M— C.
' 0 1,000 2,000 4,000
Feet
' Shorewood Planning Department
11/09
"'"' . (Lake Nlinne%ashta)
Minimum Density Residential
(.1 -1 units per acre)
Low Density Residential
(1 -2 units per acre)
Low to Medium Density Residential
(2 -3 units per acre)
- Medium Density Residential
(3-6 units per acre)
= Public
Semi Public
Commercial
Designated Wetland
LU -23
Proposed
Land Use Plan
2030
('o_m_m It is recommended that commercial uses in Shorewood be confined to cohesive,
compact activity centers. The only commercial uses shown in the western portion of the
community are an existing marina on Howards Point Road, an auto repair operation oil.
Smithtown Road near Eureka Road, and a nonconforming yacht club on Enchanted Island. The
marina is a nonconforming use within a residential zoning district. Although the City amended
its L -R, Lakeshore Recreational zoning district to encourage the marina to obtain a conforming
use status, the owners have not taken advantage of the relaxed regulations to date. Recently it
appears there may be some interest in redeveloping the marina property. If this does occur, it is
anticipated that any change in use would reflect the minimum density residential designation
shown on the Proposed Land Use Plan. The auto repair business on Smithtown Road has been
rezoned for residential use at such time as the business ceases to exist. Although the yacht club
on Enchanted Island applied for L -R zoning several years ago, the City determined that it was
unable to comply with enough of the standards to warrant rezoning. While this represents a
considerable amount of land without neighborhood facilities, from a planning perspective neither
the existing nor the proposed density in western Shorewood is considered great enough to
warrant designation of an area for commercial use.
Most of the commercial land use in Shorewood is located near the center of the community and
on the east end between Vine Hill Road and Old Market Road. The area near the intersection of
Smithtown Road and County Road 19 has been mainly auto - oriented commercial. The shopping
center in that area is part of Tonka Bay, but serves as a general commercial area for Shorewood
residents as well. Commercial development along the County Road 19 corridor through
Shorewood has been noted as being prime for redevelopment. The City has expressed a strong
preference to see the northwest quadrant of Smithtown Road and County Road 19 developed in a
unified manner. This will require the assembly of various parcels and is well suited for planned
unit development. The City should be open to a possible mix of residential and commercial uses
in order to facilitate a coordinated redevelopment of the area. Tax increment financing has been
suggested as a tool to encourage the necessary land assembly. The auto - oriented strip of
commercial uses on the south side of County Road 19, adjacent to Smithtown Crossing, should
be redeveloped with more retail activities or office uses.
Several commercial properties exist at the east end of the County Road 19 corridor as it
approaches Excelsior. Although current land owners have indicated their long -term intent to
remain in their locations, the City has been approached at various times with proposals for
alterative uses outside of the existing zoning or land use designations. This area is designated
as an area of further study on the Proposed Land Use Plan.
Shorewood's primary shopping district is located on Highway 7 east of Lake Linden Drive. It is
recommended that if commercial development is proposed, it should be located in the shopping
center or its immediate vicinity. The area surrounding the shopping center has been designated
for low to medium density residential use on the Land Use Plan map, however, the City should
remain open to proposals for commercial expansion there as well. Less than one mile east of the
shopping center is an existing restaurant. It should be noted that Excelsior surrounds this site on
three sides and Highway 7 separates the property from the rest of Shorewood. As such, its
orientation is more toward the highway and downtown Excelsior.
11/09 LU -25
The area fronting on the south side of Highway 7, between Vine Hill Road and Old Market Road
is primarily neighborhood and convenience type commercial. No change in use or expansion of
the commercial zoning is proposed for this area.
Land Ilse /Zoning Changes
Subsequent to adoption of the 1981 Comprehensive Plan, the City adopted zoning regulations to
implement the Land Use Plan. A variety of residential zoning districts were established, a
commercial service district was created, regulations for existing nonconforming marinas were
adopted, and planned unit development provisions were improved and expanded. The actual
zoning of property was limited to changes that made the zoning consistent with existing land use
patterns. For example the Shady Hills area had been zoned for one -acre lots despite having
developed as half -acre lots. Undeveloped parcels planned for a higher use than their zoning were
not rezoned at the time. Rather, the intent was to rezone property in conjunction with
development requests, using the Land Use Plan as a guide.
Given recent changes in legislation, it is important that the Proposed Land Use Plan map and the
City's Zoning Districts map be consistent. Shorewood's Proposed Land Use Plan (shown on
LU -23) has been adjusted to reflect existing zoning patterns.
Shorewood's zoning regulations should be reviewed and updated periodically. Recent updates to
the City's Zoning Code have included the establishment of maximum impervious surface
requirements for properties outside of the Shoreland zoning district. This is viewed as an
important tool in maintaining the scale of new buildings in residential areas. Similar to
communities throughout the country, Shorewood has become concerned about the construction
of very large homes on existing lots in existing neighborhoods. While the City can not do much
about the seemingly increasing market for large homes, it can, through its zoning regulations,
attempt to maintain the scale of existing neighborhoods. In this regard, the City should consider
incorporating FAR (floor area ratio) into its zoning code. This establishes a maximum amount of
building area relative to lot area, further addressing the issue of residential scale.
Over the past few years the City has examined its commercial zoning districts, paring them down
from five districts to three. It has been suggested that the C -2, Service Commercial district be
phased out upon redevelopment of properties in Planning District 6. Parking requirements for
both nonresidential and residential development has been noted as an area of future study.
The Metropolitan Council's Regional Development Framework policy standard for sewered
residential development density in an overall average minimum of three units per acre for new
development and five or more emits per acre for redevelopment and infill in "Developed"
communities — with higher densities expected in locations with convenient access to
transportation corridors and adequate sewer capacity. Given the extent and pattern of existing
development in Shorewood very little opportunity exists to achieve higher densities. This is
compounded by the fact that only half of the city has municipal water service and existing streets
are not designed for higher traffic volumes that would accompany higher density housing. Nor
does the area have adequate mass transit to support higher density. There are, however, a couple
of potential redevelopment locations that could support some sort of higher density housing. The
site currently occupied by Xcel Energy on County Road 19, if redeveloped, may be suitable for
11/09 LU -26
Land Subdivision
Controlling the way land is subdivided goes hand in hand with zoning regulations in ensuring the
quality of urban development. As Shorewood's larger tracts become developed, increasing
pressure will occur to resubdivide smaller parcels and land once considered to be marginal. The
City's subdivision regulations should periodically be reviewed and updated to better address these
situations. Further, all subdivisions of land should be examined for opportunities to preserve
open space.
The current Subdivision Code provides for developers to extend streets and utilities as necessary
to accommodate the development of adjacent properties. Also the Transportation Chapter of this
Plan sets forth policies for the use of private streets. With these rules in mind the review of all
subdivision requests should consider how nearby land might develop in the future. Area
planning should be done to demonstrate how specific subdivision requests fit with existing and
future development.
More often than not when one landowner is ready to subdivide its property, the adjoining
landowner is not. Timing then becomes an obstacle to avoiding detrimental piece -meal
development. The City can, in certain instances, overcome such obstacles by carefully crafting
development agreements and restrictive covenants that provide for future development. For
example, public right -of -way can be required for future streets with provisions that further
development will result in street and utility assessments. Planned unit development can be used
as a tool to accommodate the different timing of various landowners' development requests.
Where it is not possible to facilitate coordination between landowners, subdivision should be
deemed premature.
As smaller pieces of land are resubdivided, lot configurations become a problem. Backlot
divisions, flag lots and gerrymandered property lines undermine the benefits of building setbacks
and disrupt continuity of open spaces. All subdivisions, regardless of size, should adhere to good
planning and design principles. To this end, the use of formal platting procedures will be
encouraged, while metes and bounds subdivisions will be approved only in the very simplest of
cases.
Housing Variety /Affordability
Shorewood's attempts to provide affordable housing have been thwarted in the past by market
forces. The desirability of the area, coupled with scarcity of available land make it very difficult
to achieve housing that is considered affordable by metropolitan area standards. The City's
efforts have been focused on preserving the existing housing stock. For example, limitations
have been imposed relative to combining small buildable parcels of land into larger lots. With
respect to housing variety, the City may consider updating its current zoning regulations to
11/09 LU -27
accommodate and encourage senior housing that includes dependent living such as assisted
living and dependent care facilities.
Programs, initiatives and actions relative to housing are included in Appendix A of this plan.
Lake Access
In 1988, after considerable study, the City adopted zoning controls that addressed the use of old
existing fire lanes within the community. Originally platted as public rights -of -way leading to
Lake Minnetonka and Lake William, these lanes have been classified and regulated based upon
their historic use. This effort concluded that the fire lanes should not be vacated, but should be
preserved for public use.
Access to Shorewood's lakes is also provided by three existing marinas and yacht clubs. It has
been determined that the yacht club located on Enchanted Island should continue to function as it
has in the past and not be expanded due to its residential location and poor access. The City has
revised its L -R, Lakeshore Recreational District regulations in order to encourage the marina on
Howards Point Road and the yacht club north of County Road 19 to comply with City standards.
To date, owners of the Howard's Point Marina have not taken advantage of the relaxed L -R
district provisions. Further, the City has been approached by developers interested in
redeveloping the property. It is worth noting that this property has limited land that actually
abuts Lake Minnetonka. It is expected that any plans for redevelopment of this property will
respect the current zoning pattern in the area as well as the physical restraints associated with the
property. The City recently relaxed a restriction on the mooring of power boats at the Shorewood
Yacht Club, located on the north side of County Road 19, east of Timber Lane. Over the next
three years, the City will monitor activity at the Yacht Chub to determine whether the rule
changes are compatible with surrounding residential uses. At the same time, Yacht Club owners
will determine the future viability of the club under the revised rules.
The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources and the LMCD continue to search for lake
access parking spaces adjacent to Lake Minnetonka. The City should cooperate with these
agencies to provide small, scattered facilities compatible with nearby land uses.
Historic Preservation
Historic assets help to promote community pride and create a sense of community. The City of
Shorewood will create an inventory of historically significant features, landmarks and buildings
and evaluate tools for preserving these areas and structures. Where feasible, the City will assist
11/09 LU -28
with the acquisition of historically significant sites or structures, in order to provide educational
or recreational opportunities.
Solar Access Protection
The following table shows the acreages of various categories of land use based upon the Existing
Land Use map on page LU -21 and the Proposed Land Use Plan 2030 shown on page LU -23.
Existing and Proposed band Uses in Acres*
Acres* (Percent of Total)
Land Use
2008)
2020
2030
Wetlands
337(10)
337(10)
337(10)
Undeveloped
85( 2)
0( 0)
0( 0)
Single- Family Res.
2173(62)
2255(65)
2255(65)
Two - Family Res.
117( 3)
117( 3)
117( 3)
Multiple - Family Res.
34( 1)
34( 1)
34( 1)
Public
172( 5)
172( 5)
172( 5)
Semi- Public
170( 5)
170( 5)
170( 5)
Commercial
63( 2)
64( 2)
64( 2)
Transportation
341 10
343 10
343 10
Total
3492(100)
3492(100)
3492(100)
*With the exception of the wetland and transportation classifications, all acreages shown are net
acres (i.e. exclusive of wetlands, public right -of -way and public open space.
Open water bodies amount to 1886 acres
11/09 LU -29
Based upon the 2000 Census, the average household size for Shorewood was 2.9 persons per
household. The Metropolitan Council projects declines in household size in the region down to
2.6 in 2010 and 2.4 in 2020. While this may be true for the region as a whole, the decline in
Shorewood may not be as great, since Shorewood is predominantly single - family residential,
with very few multiple - family units. The Metropolitan Council provides forecasts for
households, population and employment. These forecasts are shown on the table below. The
forecasts suggest that Shorewood would add 12 units per year between 2010 and 2020. Between
2020 and 2030 ninety additional units would be added.
Household, Population and Employment Projections
*Metropolitan Council Forecasts
It should be noted that the calculations above do not account for redevelopment where several
existing lots are combined then resubdivided to create additional lots. While this requires
extraordinary cooperation between property owners, it will increasingly occur as land prices
continue to outstrip the value of some of the older housing stock.
11/09 LU -30
1990 2000 2008 2010*
2020*
2030*
Households
2026 2529 2730 2750
2870
2960
Population
5917 7400 7917 7850
8000
8100
Employment
990
1160
1180
*Metropolitan Council Forecasts
It should be noted that the calculations above do not account for redevelopment where several
existing lots are combined then resubdivided to create additional lots. While this requires
extraordinary cooperation between property owners, it will increasingly occur as land prices
continue to outstrip the value of some of the older housing stock.
11/09 LU -30
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
, C.-P.. P
I Mlner� G
I C,r�tu Frr
I YC4i4�G
2V —
(Lake Nlinoewas6ta)
Vacant and
Underdeveloped Land
A
' 0 1,000 2,000 4,000
Feet
Shorewood Planning Department
11/09
® Vacant
Parcels Over 80,000 Sq. Ft.
LU -31
Chapter Summary
The City shall establish a pattern of land uses which
consistent with the residential and recreational
Lfunctions of the community.
The land use plan shall promote harmonious
relationships between various land uses (e.g. homes,
commercial outlets, churches, parks, schools, etc.)
through proper development and locational planning.
Through land use planning discourage land uses which
are inconsistent with the residential and natural
character of the community.
The City shall promote safe, healthy and affordable
housing options.
The following summary of recommendations is reflective
of the City's goals, objectives and policies:
Establish planning districts based upon natural
divisions and physical barriers.
2. Create and enhance focal points within each
planning district or neighborhood.
3. Commercial development should be consistent with
the residential character of the community and
concentrated to three primary locations: 1) Country
Club Road /County Road 19; 2) Lake Linden/
Highway 7; and 3) Vine Hill Road /Highway 7.
4. Promote the use of sound planning and design
principles, including planned unit development.
11/09 LU -33
Coordinate the development of s_ alb land parcels to ensure that access and utility service
comply with City standards.
6. Maintain a Land Use Plan to illustrate the relationship of various densities of residential
development and nonresidential uses.
7. Keep the City's land use controls (e.g. zoning and subdivision ordinances) up to date to
implement the Land Use Plan.
8. Identify areas which are best suited for planned unit development.
9. Require formal platting procedures for the subdivision of land, allowing metes and
bounds divisions only in the simplest of cases.
10. Prepare a separate housing plan describing Shorewood's existing housing stock and
identify measures to encourage the preservation of the existing diversity of housing types.
11. Recognizing certain existing nonconformities, seek ways to bring Howard's Point Marina
into substantial compliance with the revised Lakeshore Recreational (L -R) zoning district.
12. Promote and implement programs for the preservation of open space.
11/09 LU -34
, rransportation Plan - Chapter Outline
Introduction __,~-----------.'--------------.-------TR-/
Goals and ONbjectiveS..~ ........ ........... .......... ~...................... -----~—......
TR-
Issues ............... ---...................... --.—.-........................ ----...................
IR-5
Policies ......... —............................ —... --- ................. ......... - .................. —.......
�TD,7
Transportation ........................ —....................................... ... . ......................
TR']l
Strocta - Punctuuul Classi fication ...... .......................................... .....
IR-ll
Local streets
Collector streets
Minor expanders
Intermediate arterials
Streets - Municipal State Aid System (MS/\) .................................................
TIl-22
Mass Transit ....................................................................................................
Ill-22
Bicycle/Pedestr Trails ................................................................................
TR-25
Snopm - nobiley ...........................................................................
TK,26
Airports -----------------------------------'TR'20
Traffic Volumes and Traffic Forecasts ..............................................
TR-3Y
Chapter Summary .....................................................................................................
Tll-3 5
Introduction
The Shorewood Transportation Plan describes Shorewood's
existing transportation system by functional classification,
identifies problem areas within the system and recommends
improvements to resolve those problem areas. The plan
also recommends right -of -way and roadway widths, which
would provide continuity within the street system.
Although emphasis in this element of Shorewood's
Comprehensive Plan is placed on the street circulation plan,
there are a number of other transportation related
components that deserve consideration. They include mass
transit, pedestrian/bicycle circulation, railroads and
aviation.
11/09 TR -1
Transportation
Goals fi d Objectiv
Transportation Goals
The City shall provide and maintain a safe and efficient
system of transportation, sensitive to the needs of residents
and the environment of the community.
The City should establish a plan for an interconnected
system of trails, enhancing the safe movement of
pedestrians, bicyclists and other modes of non - motorized
travel.
Reduce the need for transportation facilities by
combining or concentrating various land use
activities, when and where feasible.
2. Promote regional transportation facilities that are
safe, direct, convenient and environmentally sound
and coordinate plans with other jurisdictions.
Design safe, efficient and economical local
transportation facilities based upon the needs of
neighborhoods, integrating these facilities into the
community and regional systems.
4. Utilize a comprehensive system and approach to
transportation, giving due attention to all modes and
related facilities.
Assign priorities to various travel routes, modes and
programs, then formulate and implement a
corresponding action and development effort.
6. Provide safe trail connections to points of interest in
the community and link to trails provided by
Hennepin County and adjacent municipalities.
7. Implement trail segments on an incremental basis
consistent with an overall plan.
Explore all outside funding resources to implement
local transportation plans.
11/09 TR -3
Transportation
Issues
Street Maintenance and Reconstruction
Many of Shorewood's streets were constructed in the early
1970's at the time the sanitary sewer system was built.
Nearly 40 years later the useful life of many of these streets
is near an end. Street maintenance and reconstruction are
viewed as key topics of discussion for years to come. The
City has initiated a long -term pavement inventory and
management plan to identify and prioritize maintenance
and reconstruction projects in the future. In addition to
physically analyzing Shorewood's roadway conditions, the
plan must address two significant issues. First, the public
improvement process needs to be refined to better examine
project feasibility early in the process. Secondly, the plan
should examine all possible methods of financing
improvement projects.
Municipal State Aid System
In 1989 Shorewood's population exceeded 5000, malting
the city eligible for MSA funding. The MSA routes
currently designated require review as well as the design
standards for construction.
Fire Protection
Due to the narrow surface widths of certain streets in
Shorewood, a serious question exists over the adequacy of
road access for emergency vehicles. As the availability of
municipal water is quite limited, fire fighting efforts are
11/09 TR -5
generally dependent upon the use of tank trucks, However, on narrow roads there often is not
sufficient room for tank trucks and Pumpers to pass each other, and thus fire protection efforts
may be critically jeopardized.
UNNIFIMEW
ikeays /Trails
Although viewed primarily as recreational these facilities relate closely to other transportation
modes. It is important that planning for streets take into account the safe movement of bicyclists
and pedestrians.
11/09 TR -6
Transportation
Policies
2. All means of transportation and related facilities
shall be considered as one system and therefore
coordinated and related comprehensively.
3. Transportation facilities shall be planned and
designed to conserve natural resources and
minimize the total need for ongoing public
investment.
4. The transportation system shall be developed to
focus on activity centers of Shorewood and
neighboring south shore communities, and to
promote safe and efficient movement of traffic
through and out of the city to the Metro Area.
5. Transportation planning and implementation shall
be coordinated with neighboring and affected
jurisdictions.
6. Special consideration and attention shall be given to
persons who must rely on means other than the
automobile for transportation.
7. Dependency upon automobile- oriented
transportation shall be reduced where feasible, and
where possible higher priorities shall be assigned to
pedestrian/bicycle and mass transit travel.
8. The state and county highway system shall
complement and facilitate local movements
provided by local streets, bicycle trails and
pedestrian facilities. A line of communication shall
be maintained with county and state highway
11/09 TR -7
officials in order to ensure that planned improvements are consistent with the goals and
objectives of the community.
9. Early and continuing citizen involvement shall be provided for and encouraged in
transportation plartning and implementation projects.
A functional classification system for the street system in Shorewood has been
established and shall be maintained, giving due consideration to the Metropolitan
Council's Functional Classification System for d highways, as may be amended.
2. All local or residential streets shall be designed to limit penetration of through traffic and
shall direct traffic to collector or arterial streets.
3. Land access onto expander and arterial streets shall be limited or prevented wherever
possible.
4. Vehicular access onto all types of arterials shall be minimized and limited to points of
adequate distances between intersections with proper signalization and /or merging.
Street parking shall be prohibited or limited on arterial streets.
All intersections shall have proper visibility, design, and control to prevent accidents and
violations.
7. Service roads paralleling major arterials shall be controlled to reduce traffic conflicts,
hazards and resulting accidents.
Single- loaded frontage roads shall be discouraged in the future.
9. The amount and diversity of traffic signing shall be reduced. An updated and improved
traffic signing system is to be maintained.
10. Street improvement shall be related to, and phased with, area land development in order
to avoid interrupted or inadequate access.
11. Curb and gutter shall be required in new development and reconstruction of existing
streets. Where drainage is not a problem, other drainage solutions shall be considered
where more economical and practical.
12. In those areas where incomplete street facilities exist, action shall be taken to plan, design
and develop a street system that reflects the highest standards and relates land use to
transportation needs and policies. Action shall be taken immediately to reserve required
rights -of -way to prevent redundant additional cost and difficulties.
13. Where feasible and practical, provisions for other transportation modes (i.e. pedestrian,
bicycles, etc.) shall be included in street and highway improvement plans.
11/09 TR -8
14, The City shall strive to mininnize damage to city ,streets through measures such as
organized trash collection and enforcement of seasonal weight restrictions.
No development or expansion of activities and uses shall be permitted unless adequate
off - street parking is provided.
2. Parking requirements imposed by the City shall be periodically reviewed and studied to
ensure supply is reflective of demand.
Parking shall be developed in a fashion that conserves land, allows joint utilization and
minimizes conflicts with moving vehicular traffic, pedestrians and cyclists.
4. Parking lot access to public streets shall be limited to the functional minimums.
5. The City shall enforce standards for parking lot landscaping.
6. The City shall seek reduction in the demand and resulting space requirements for parking
through improved pedestrian and transit facilities and land use development coordination.
Mass Transit
Increased service and the use of mass transit shall be encouraged by the City of
Shorewood.
2. Attempts shall be made to have transit service available with rider conveniences, such as
shelters, in the activity centers of the community.
Strive to develop transit service for those who do not have other transportation
alternatives.
4. Transit service, through related improvements and land use policies, shall be encouraged
by the City during non -peak, non -rush hour periods in addition to peak and rush hour
periods.
Shorewood business districts shall be encouraged to establish themselves as transit
"stations" or suburban collection points through provisions for park and ride, transfer
routes and direct express service to other commercial and employment activity centers of
the metropolitan area and southwestern subregion.
6. Availability of transit service, notably during rush hours, to activity areas and regional
centers in other communities shall be encouraged.
7. All potential means and methods of providing and improving transit service (school
buses, taxis, etc.) shall be explored.
11/09 TR -9
Pedestrian /Bicycle
Where possible and economically feasible, a separated traveled surface shall be provided
for pedestrians and cyclists.
2. Special attention shall be directed and facilities provided for pedestrian movement and
access in areas in and surrounding schools, churches, parks, commercial and service
centers.
3. Pedestrian street crossings on heavily traveled streets shall be clearly marked and lighted.
4. All street improvement programs and projects shall take into consideration facilities for
pedestrians and bicycles as identified in the Trail Concept Plan, shown on Page TR -27.
Non -local streets in Shorewood shall be designed to protect pedestrian and bicycle
movement paralleling traffic.
6. New development shall be encouraged to respect the pedestrian/bicycle system, shown on
Page TR -27, and where possible to contribute to the City right -of -way and development
costs.
7. Construction and maintenance of trails shall be based on established standards and
specifications to ensure safe conditions.
Shorewood will establish development standards for the construction of trails, as well as
maintenance standards and programs, to ensure safe conditions.
Trail segments shall be established within parks to provide connections between various
facilities and to accommodate recreational usage.
10. Priorities for the funding of the construction of trails shall be established on the basis of
safety concerns, funding conditions and neighborhood acceptance.
11. Shorewood will explore all funding sources, including outside grant funds for the
construction of trails, provided that such funding sources accommodate local needs and
design criteria.
12. Shorewood will cooperate with other jurisdictions, including the School Districts and
Hennepin County, in providing a trail system that meets local and regional needs.
13. Shorewood will work with other area communities to investigate the establishment of a
trail network that could provide connections to points of interest and environmental
features, including continuous access around Lake Minnetonka.
14. Shorewood will work with other area communities to investigate the establishment of
bicycle and mass transit linkages that would serve bicycle commuters.
11/09 TR -10
Transportation Plan
Streets - Functional Classification System
In general, Shorewood's streets can be classified according
to use as local, collector, minor expander and principal
arterial streets. A local street is designed to discourage
through traffic, primarily providing access to immediate
adjacent land. Moving traffic is a secondary function. The
collector street intercepts traffic from residential areas, etc.,
and carries it to or from the arterial system and community
activity centers. Minor expanders move traffic between
subregions with direct land access being limited. Principal
arterials also connect subregions, carrying higher traffic
volumes and providing access to major traffic generators.
Page TR -14 illustrates the functional classification plan for
the south Lake Minnetonka area and shows how
Shorewood relates to the regional system. Page TR -15
provides a more detailed overview of the proposed
transportation plan for the community. The following is a
discussion of each fiinctional classification as it pertains to
the City of Shorewood.
Local Streets The Transportation Plan map does not
attempt to show other than existing local streets. Location
of new local streets is left to the developer to decide.
However, in reviewing development requests, the City
should carefully consider the following recommendations:
In new subdivisions, as opposed to simple
resubdivisions, all lots should abut on a publicly
dedicated street. While it is the City's policy to
11/09 TR- I 1
Metropolitan
Functional Classification
Metropolitan Highways
Principal Arterials
- Interstate freeways
- Other principal arterials
Local Highways and Roads
- Minor arterials
- Collector streets
- Local streets
Principal Arterials
The metropolitan highway system is made up of the principal arterials in the region. Principal arterials include all
interstate freeways. Interstate freeways connect the region with other areas in the state and other states. They also
connect the metro centers to regional business concentrations (see Figure 1). The emphasis is on mobility as
opposed to land access. They only connect with other interstate freeways, other principal arterials and select minor
arterials and collectors. The interstate freeways provide for the longest trips in the region and express bus service.
Spacing will vary from two to three miles in the fully developed area, to six to 12 miles in the rural area, where oruy
radials into the urban service area will exist. Other principal arterials are very similar to the interstate freeways but
they are less likely to connect the region to other states. They will provide land access somewhat more frequently
than interstate freeways.
Minor Arterials
The minor arterial system connects the urban service area to cities and towns inside and outside the region. They
interconnect the rural growth centers in the region to one another as well as to similar places just outside the region.
They provide supplementary connections between the two metro centers and the regional business concentrations.
They connect major generators within the central business districts (CBDS) and the regional business
concentrations.
M
TR -13
City of Shorewood
Roadway Functional Classification
s
,z
A
Functional Class Roads
Principal Arterial
� V - . A Minor Augmentor
A Minor Reliever
A Minor Expander
NA Minor Connector
VV B Minor
Major Collector
Minor Collector
Local Roadways
Future Roadways Functional Classification
�•'�. Principal Arterial
A Minor Augmentor
A Minor Reliever
A Minor Expander
""%"." Minor Connector
B Minor
• ,• Major Colletor
Minor Collector
County Boundary
2 0 2 4 Miles
January 2003
/ Metropolitan Council
V Building communities that work
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
I:iJild 2shay -s d 1
i
sh.ey �i-a C.
Lake Minnetonka
to ka . - Bird
rr 7'7 - " J#
NN i1h;1 T11
.��'�.c+a_`. fi -� ' ✓�, � h ,:
f _ i
UL_
0
1 sqn g C -
! , B PA. -�
M. Alnans
5
A
0 1.000 2.000 4,000
Feet
' Shorewood Planning Department
01/09
2 P-d Vmw Dr
(Lake MinneNashta)
Principal Arterial
Local Street
Minor Expander
I I I I MSA Route (existing)
Major Collector
• • MSA Route (future)
• - - Minor Collector
® Area of Further Study
r[� �4 \ • �' j'rie ._ 3 VMrTeY Gr
4 ChesmN Tern
C. Ct
yd' ] 6 Mct w, C,
�Y� �� -per �. •��,_ -, � 6�
Transportation Plan
TR -1
discourage private streets, in certain limited cases of lot resubdivision, the City has
adopted the policy that as many as three lots may be allowed access by private easement,
subject to the following criteria:
a. The land to be subdivided is not capable of being divided into i ore than three
lots,
b. Consideration is given to surrounding undeveloped property.
- s - •
d. Legal provisions are made for the use and maintenance of the road.
e. Where private roads are approved, protective covenants will be required stating
that the City will not take over or maintain them.
f. The minimum width of the paved surface for private streets shall be 20 feet where
adequate off - street parking is provided. Where the potential exists for on- street
parking the minimum shall be 24 feet.
2. Subdivision circulation patterns should be examined from a broader perspective than just
the individual site. In this regard, consideration must be given to surrounding
undeveloped property as well as existing street patterns to ensure that the most efficient
transportation network is achieved.
3. All streets should meet the minimum design standards established by the City. Existing
standards such as minimum road width and length of cul -de -sac streets have been re-
evaluated in terms of safety (emergency vehicles access) and street maintenance
(snowplowing). It is recommended that the minimum right -of -way width for local streets
be maintained at 50 feet and that the maximum length for cul -de -sac streets should be 700
feet.
4. In areas where existing streets have substandard right -of -way widths, the City shall
acquire, to the extent possible, additional right -of -way through the subdivision process.
For local streets the following criteria should be used to evaluate appropriate pavement widths:
24 -foot street • use in areas where zoning requires lots to be 20,000 square feet in
area or larger
• on- street parking restricted to one side
• consider additional parking restrictions for through streets
28 -foot street • use in areas where zoning allows lots smaller than 20,000 square
feet in area
• on- street parking restricted to one side
11/09 TR -17
' -foot st reet 0 use in areas where abutting properties are occupied or zoned for
two- family or multiple-family dwellings or on through streets
where on- street bicycle /pedestrian traffic is a factor
® if on- street parking is allowed on both sides of street, consider
separated bicycle /pedestrian facilities
It should be noted that streets currently exist which are less than 24 feet in width. While
substandard streets may be maintained at their current design, in no case shall streets be
reconstructed at a width less than 20 feet. Substandard streets shall be evaluated based on their
use characteristics (i.e. land use intensity, on- street parking, bicycle /pedestrian traffic, etc.).
The City recognizes that it may not be feasible to reconstruct existing streets to the preceding
standards. Specifically, existing streets may be rebuilt to their existing width (but not less than
20 feet). Curb and gutter will be installed where necessary for drainage purposes or where traffic
dictates.
The City has completed a long -term pavement inventory and a long -term management plan that
should be completed by the end of this year. The intent of the plan is to quantify well into the
future how much work will need to be done in coining years, prioritize improvements and
propose a long -term strategy for financing those improvements. From the plan, a new process for
evaluating reconstruction projects should be developed, including early identification of project
obstacles (i.e. lack of right -of -way) and early neighborhood involvement. In this regard, the
City's standard Plamling Process of strategy, inventory, policy planning, project planning, and
implementation should be employed.
Shorewood has a number of "paper streets ", that is, dedicated rights -of -way that were once
platted but never built. These rights -of -way should be inventoried and analyzed as to their
potential for future use. Where it can be clearly demonstrated that no public purpose exists, the
rights -of way should be approved for vacation and returned to the tax rolls.
In the mid 1980's Shorewood adopted seasonal weight restrictions in an effort to reduce wear and
tear on City streets. These restrictions, however, were not extended to garbage trucks. The City
currently licenses six refuse haulers to operate within the community. Aside from having to
obtain a license, refuse haulers are basically unregulated. Since garbage trucks have been
identified as the single most damaging vehicle to city streets, serious consideration must be given
to establishing regulations that limit the extent of the damage. This topic is discussed in greater
detail in the Community Facilities /Services chapter of this Plan.
Collector Streets Streets in Shorewood that are currently classified as collectors include
Minnetonka Boulevard in the Northeast corner of the City; Old Market Road /Covington Road
and the south end of Vine Hill Road in the southeast corner of the City; Galpin Lake Road south
of Highway 7; Eureka Road between Smithtown Road and Highway 7; and Smithtown Road. In
plamling for its circulation network Shorewood has classified two additional routes as collectors:
1) Country Club Road /Yellowstone Trail /Lake Linden Drive; and 2) Vine Hill Road north of
Covington Road.
11/09 TR -18
Traffic levels on Country Club /Yellowstone /Lake Linden greatly exceed those that are
recommended for a local street. While it is not intended to encourage traffic to ,shortcut between
County Road 19 and Highway 7, it is important that the street be designed to safely carry the
existing traffic.
Traffic studies prepared for the development of Shorewood's southeast area suggest that the
collector function for that area be split by Old Market Road and Vine Hill Road, resulting in two
"minor" collectors. To maintain a balance of traffic between the two streets, the intersection of
Covington Road and Vine Hill Road should remain in its current "T" configuration. If future
traffic patterns warrant it consideration should be given to other intersection designs which
would maintain balance of traffic flow.
Although Vine Hill Road may be expensive to upgrade, it should be incorporated into the City's
Municipal State Aid (MSA) system. The City should work with the City of Minnetonka to
upgrade it to a "minor" collector status, that is, a street designed to function somewhere between
a local and collector street designation. Capacity issues have arisen at the intersection of Vine
Hill Road and State Highway 7, mostly associated with traffic to and from the Mimletonka High
School. It is recommended that the City work with adjoining communities to commission a
traffic study for this intersection.
Minor Expanders Within the community, there are two roads designated as minor expanders -
County Road 19 north of Highway 7 and Mill Street (County Road 82) to the south of Highway
7. There are no current plans by Hennepin County to upgrade any of the county roads in
Shorewood. A significant improvement to the intersection of County Road 19 /Smithtown
Road /Country Club Road was completed in 2005. This project resolved intersection geometries
as well as individual site access issues, consolidating property access points where it was
feasible.
Principal Arterials. The largest traffic carrier in Shorewood is State Highway 7, which is
classified as a principal arterial. In 1986 Shorewood participated with the Department of
Transportation, the Metropolitan Council and several communities abutting Highway 7 in the
preparation of the T.H. 7 Corridor Study, dated November, 1986. The study recommended
improvements for the segment of Highway 7 between State Highway 101 to the east and
Minnewashta Parkway to the west. A second Corridor Study was conducted in 1995 that
recommends improvements for Highway 7 between State Highway 41 and the City of
Hutchinson to the west.
11/09 TR -19
In adopting the 1986 Corridor Study, Shorewood qualified its approval by taking issue with
certain recommendations in the study. Following are the City's positions:
St. Alban's Bay Road /Covington Road. The proposed overpass /interchange is expected to
require nearly half of the estimated $ 10.1 million necessary to fund improvements for the
entire corridor. Shorewood is on record as questioning the cost versus benefit of this
design. The City's position is that the intersections at Old Market Road and at Vine Hill
Road will prove to be adequate to handle fixture traffic.
2. Service Road - Old Market Road to Christmas Lake Road. Construction of this segment
of service road on the south side of Highway 7 would require substantial cutting of the
large hill west of Radisson Entrance and filling the wetland to the east. Both efforts
would require expensive retaining walls. Traffic levels on the north end of Christmas
Lake do not warrant the expense, financially or environmentally.
Radisson Road east of the existing service road has been noted as being narrow, winding
and potentially hazardous. Proximity of homes to the roadway makes upgrading of the
street very difficult and expensive. Traffic in this area will continue to be monitored and
if volumes warrant it, further consideration should be given to directional or other
regulatory controls.
Excelsior West. Page TR -21 illustrates the proposed realignment of Galpin Lake Road to
intersect with Water Street, and the connection of Chaska Road to Galpin Lake Road.
Initially, the City objected to this recommendation due to expense and impact on
residential property. Upon further review, the redesign may be feasible, but expensive.
Unless MNDOT will assist in necessary right -of -way acquisition, the improvement is
considered to be a long range project. In the meantime the City should study alternatives
to the proposed design.
4. Trunk Highway 41 Area. In cooperation with MNDOT, Shorewood reconstructed the
intersection at State Highway 41 and Chaska Road in 2002. The right -on, right -off
intersection at Lake Linden Drive was closed and the geometries of the signalized
intersection were improved. Private property development was required to minimize
access points near the intersection, fulfilling the recommendations of the Corridor Studies
relative to this area.
Communities involved in the 1995 Corridor Study were advised early on that funding would not
be available for the construction of a four -lane, divided highway from Highway 41 west to the
City of Hutchinson. Nevertheless, a four -lane roadway was viewed as a long -term goal. In the
11/09 TR -20
i
i North
Academy Ave.
t J O
SAO
�l is
oe
i ,'q 1
PASS l rr
t°11 s _
TR_21 Galpin Lake Road Intersection
Realignment Per T.H. 7 Corridor Study
As evidenced by Shorewood's implementation of the two corridor studies for Highway 7, the
City has worked closely with MNDOT in the management of access to the highway. DOT's
access management guidelines will continue to be considered for all development abutting
Highway 7. Similarly, all development access to county roads is referred to the Hennepin
County Department of Transportation for permit approval.
Streets - Minnesota State raid System
In 1989, upon reaching a population of 5000, Shorewood became eligible for participation in the
Municipal State Aid System. This program contributes approximately $244,000 annually to the
City's street construction fund. Shorewood's allocation for MSA funds is based on nine miles of
its total 50 miles of streets. Proposed MSA routes are shown on the Transportation Plan map on
page TR -15.
The Transportation Plan coordinates the proposed street classification system with MSA route
designations. With the exception of Galpin Lake Road and Minnetonka Boulevard, collector
streets are proposed as MSA routes. Three local streets on the west end of the city, north of
Smithtown Road, are also designated as MSA routes. Cathcart Drive and Excelsior Boulevard
are designated as future MSA routes as mileage becomes available.
Although the MSA system is primarily a funding resource, there are certain design implications,
particularly with respect to local streets. For example, the minimum width required for an MSA
route is 26 feet. MSA standards also require curb and gutter, whereas the City's current policy
for reconstruction of existing streets requires curb and gutter only where drainage or traffic
necessitate. As MSA streets are planned, their use characteristics must be examined to ensure
that adequate width is provided to accommodate area land uses, (e.g. need for on- street parking).
It must be realized that only limited mileage can be constructed annually.
Mass Transit
Shorewood is within the Metropolitan Transit Taxing District — Market Area III. Service options
for Market Area III include peak -only express, small vehicle circulators, midday circulators,
special needs paratransit (ADA, seniors) and ridesharing. The map on the following page shows
the two transit routes that currently serve Shorewood, as well as park and ride locations in
Excelsior and at the intersection of Vine Hill Road and State Highway 7. A park and ride
location previously located at the Shorewood City Hall property was discontinued, presumably
for lack of use.
11/09 TR -22
4
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
5
2 F—R
JV*e C-
�C—W .n
5 CMaM C'
8 m—y C'
2`'"— (Lake Minnewashta)
Transit Routes
' 0 1,000 2.000 4,000
Feet
' Shorewood Planning Department
12/09
670-
a
PARR&
RIDE
Bus Route
Park and Ride Location
TR -2; Source: metrotransit.org
Lobby the state legislature to provide new opportunities to opt out of the Metropolitan
Council Transit System. Then join with other communities to establish an autonomous
"subregional" system.
2. Work with the Metropolitan Council to enhance the current Dial -a -Ride program. If
successful, this type of program should be renewed annually.
Convince the Metropolitan Council that the south Lake Minnetonka communities (i.e.
Shorewood, Tonka Bay, Excelsior and Greenwood) be designated as a transit hub and
connected to other outer -ring suburban hub areas.
4. Consider joining another transit system, such as Southwest Metro Transit.
Upon completion of an opt -out study, Shorewood has decided to remain in the Metropolitan
Council Transit System. The City should work with area communities and the Metropolitan
Council to maintain the level of service of the Metro Mobility program. Services such as this
will become increasingly important as the population continues to age.
The Metropolitan Council continues to study and analyze ridership levels in the area. Shorewood
should seek citizen input to determine the level of service desired by the community.
Bicycle /Pedestrian 'Trails
As noted in the Concept Plan section of the Land Use Chapter, trails are viewed as an effective
way to connect neighborhoods, thereby enhancing a sense of community in Shorewood. Trails
are primarily considered as an element of parks and recreation, but due to their interrelationship
with other transportation elements, they will also be discussed in the Transportation chapter.
In 1998, after a series of community meetings and a survey of Shorewood residents, the Park
Commission developed a planning process that places an emphasis on early and continuing
neighborhood involvement in the establishment of an overall network of trails within the
community. The Trail Concept Plan, shown on page TR -27, identifies a potential system of trails
within Shorewood that concentrates on the connection of neighborhoods to one another and to
various points of interest within the community. The trail planning process continues with the
following steps:
Periodically the Park Commission identifies potential segments of trails to be considered
in the coming years.
2. Trail walks, including area residents, are scheduled to identify issues specific to various
segments of trails.
11/09 TR -25
Trail segments are incorporated into the City's Capital Improvement Program.*
4. Meetings are conducted with affected neighborhoods to determine the best trail design for
the various segments of trails.
5. Trail segments are constructed based upon the availability of funding.
*It should be noted that not all trail segments will be incorporated into the Capital
Improvement Program. Due to limited funding resources, trails will be constructed in
areas where resident demand is highest, as opposed to areas where it is demonstrated that
resident desire for trails is low.
It is recommended that the Trail Concept Plan, as may be amended, be consulted for all
development proposals and street construction projects. Where trails are designated on or
adjacent to roadways, right -of -way should be required as part of the subdivision approval
process. Construction of trails on or along roadways should be incorporated into street
improvement plamling.
Although the right -of -way currently owned by the Hennepin County Regional Railroad Authority
(HCRRA) has been identified for future light rail transit, it has become an important recreational
feature in the South Lake Area. The Three Rivers Park District currently operates the Lake
Mimietonka LRT Regional Trail on this corridor. The City should be proactive to ensure that the
right -of -way remains open for recreational use if light rail transit does not materialize.
Snowmobiles
Snowmobiles have been a continued source of controversy in recent years, despite increased
efforts to enforce City codes regulating their use. Private property trespass and damage have
been raised as issues relative to snowmobiling. Shorewood has adopted rules intended to address
issues of compatibility between snowmobiles, pedestrians and motor vehicles. These rules will
be periodically monitored to evaluate their effectiveness.
Airports
There are no existing or proposed airports, search areas or other facilities located in the
Shorewood area. Seaplane and ultra -light operations are, however, allowed on the surface water
of Lake Minnetonka. Seaplane traffic in Shorewood has not been identified as a problem at the
present time. However, as use of Lake Mimnetonka increases, the potential for problems to arise
also increases. This use of the lake should be monitored and at such time it is determined to be a
problem, a regional study on the topic should be conducted to determine if there is a need for a
specialized area of the lake to handle seaplane operations. This study should be a joint effort
between all lake communities and may best be handled by the Lake Minnetonka Conservation
District.
Structures that are 200 feet or higher above ground level may pose hazards to air navigation.
Shorewood has no existing structures of this height. The City's zoning requirements do not
allow structures this tall, nor does the City plan to permit such structures in the fixture. Any party
who proposes to construct such a structure shall notify the City and the Federal Aviation Agency
11/09 TR -26
, .1 2 Shady Maw Pt
( 3 Shady Nh d T,
1 (Shady 1W dG
Smithtown
Ba-
Island
Victoria Trail
Connection
N
' 0 1,000 2,000 4,000
Feet
' Shorewood Planning Department
11/09
Lake Minnetonka
I pper Lake
CITY OF SH
i
Lase 111noewasn1at
ORIEWOOD
unannassen I raii Chanhassen Trail
Connection Connection
tw 3 -
Chanhassen Trail
Connection
Existing Trail
Possible Trail
- Parks /Open Space
Connecting Points
� TR -27
1C'—v- Ct
2 Ebert Pt
3 VMMay C•
4 Chestrue Ten
5 Chestnut Ct
6 M Wy
Minnetonka
Trail
Connection
Trail Concept Plan
s� gC• � � �
Traffic Volumes and 'Travel Forecasts
11/09 TR -29
2005 :�1,S,_ _S,'TJRAFFIC VOLY_'\IF
(SEE NOTE)
MUNICIPALITY OF
SHOREWOOD
PREPARED BY THE
MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
OFFICE OF TRANSPORTATION DATA & ANALYSIS
IN COOPERATION WITH
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION
MATE
1660 0 1600 320D FEET
50(' 0 5D0 1000 METERS
2005
DASIC DATA - 1990
N
W . E
1
s
LEGEND
INTERSTATE TRUNK HIGHWAY............ G
U.S. TRUNK HIGHWAY ............. &
W CTATC TPIIMV MICUWAV r1l
0
I `
CPS 3 z7ielontl U P , L.A.
/4 �� ib.ortl
I ggg��/ PoY,t
Encl,v,totl / ,
Isiaw I �z
I
•. I
t
I
I
taw I
ny I
I
I
J I
I
I
1
I'
I �
I
NEPIN COUNN
SmAtI�,„
690
VOLUMES PREPARED BY
THE OFFICE OF
TRANSPORTATION DATA & ANALYSIS
NUIE.RAIC INDICATE AVERAGE DAILY
TRAFFIC VOLUMES ON DESIGNATED ROADS.
- TRUNK Ii1Gi:N - AY ANE _ 0,,; A.A.D.
COLNTY SYSTEM: ROADS ARE 7005 AAD.T. VOLLMffS.
1.liVICI PAL. SYSFENI ROU11 :S ARE: i?u. -A.A 1).'I ','I IIJ - .`.a:9.
TONGA 1
BAY A I
C.d an ear
` \\ 1
Dud frog
/•
Isiu,tl Ia/k"
JL \ p Q
��§( rows
LC} �
1 xulrRlg *on
/
/
cq
I Point
Ylil.yl .ai LL�Cl iil I
"
`-
c,
4 uD
)
�QQ ' `'.
PaMt
CI�RYy/
R..
Ratrsatlw+
r.-./
Big Iy
/
". ,
.r. COUNT
zI50o
�+
Vvpnla
.
/
Li
11
VICTORIA
/
CHANHASSEN
1IQf0.5
\V1
`\
Point
Co. *wt / ` vot*�( —'
,�
acPe
Polrt
1
A
1 cello q•
GREENWOOD - Ll
TONGA 1
BAY A I
C.d an ear
1
'AMM
�\
Dud frog
` \
Isiu,tl Ia/k"
JL \ p Q
��§( rows
LC} �
Mary
Idu
�ecvEw.
cq
a :II[0. � P
Ylil.yl .ai LL�Cl iil I
R.
R ro.
�
c Q CL,C ELIr-
smr.ros
y�'
I� ^(`-��v1,` /�,•
yIPA 9R. I
��§( rows
LC} �
Mary
Idu
�ecvEw.
cq
.
"
`-
c,
4 uD
nd
�QQ ' `'.
R..
ro,c>
_ u
/ r
IRPIE RI0f2 l c
". ,
.r. COUNT
zI50o
�+
Vvpnla
.
/
Li
11
VICTORIA
/
CHANHASSEN
soearg EXCELSIOR
/ St. ../Fans
ear 1
1.10 rouse Isimd p ea,. /
s. -t B IAi i O
Point Crantl.le. \ I
Point �� 1
Fr ) a
V�
Pr �
E t \y I /
Ch.Lmar Ar i
Lao. a Lake a
eRACACrrs m 8 ^ 4 Y
b4 r t a W/WAr Sr. A. 4r.Arp
CHANHASSEN
DEEPHAV
C
:e
z
z
z
L'
Z Z
L
0
U
Z
¢a
w
S P R I N G P R K
I 634 ;
M O U N D
i
/632
I
I
i
I
0
� I
H
I
w_
633
Transportation Analysis Zones (TAZ)*
Shorewood
M E T O N K A B E A.G'H
627
O R O N O
630
629
i
D E E P H A V 9,N
1 - i
1 I
TONKA BAY 625
I
628
J � ;
GREENWOOD
S H O R E W O O D
622 E X C E LS -
_ 624
13; VICTORIA
T
I
SOURCE: The geography for the TAZ's are based on the
Twin Cities Regional Travel Demand Forecast Model.
Local Roads are from The Lawrence Group's Street
Centerline data. Community Boundary. Stream. and
Open Water are from DataFinder.org
Some users describe TAZs as Traffic Analysis Zones
or some other closely related words. In principle, they
refer to similar transportation planning areas.
A" Metropolitan Council
136
C H A N H A f S E N
137
138
139
140
626
1
§d4
I
1
Y
Z
-= 0
J w
- - Z
— Z
NO
a
z
w
61iles
03 0.15 0 0.3 06
1148 TAZ Identification Number
TAZ Boundary
— Local Roads
Community Boundary
Stream
Open Water
N
Community Development
October 23, 2007
Shorewood Forecasts
Community
TAZs
2000
Shorewood
622
Shorewood
623
Shorewood
624
Shorewood
625
Shorewood
628
Shorewood
629
Shorewood
632
City Totals
N
IJ
Community
POPULATION
k 2000
2010
1 2020
2030
HOUSEHOLDS
0 0
2000 1
2010 1
2020 1
2030
2000 1
2010 1
2020 1
2030
8
10
15
15
Shorewood
624
15
15
10
10
5
5
5
5
594
600
610
640
214
235
255
270
1,798
1790
1800
1900
562
615
670
710
891
910
940
1005
377
415
450
480
117
125
120
135
48
55
55
60
3,783
3860
3930
4220
1,249
1370
1490
1600
202
200
190
190
74
75
75
75
7,400
7500
7600
8100
2,529
2770
3000
3200
City Totals
N
IJ
Community
TAZs
2000
k 2000
2010
1 2020
2030
Employment
0 0
Shorewood
622
0
0
0
0
Shorewood
623
8
10
15
15
Shorewood
624
130
175
205
210
Shorewood
625
53
75
85
85
Shorewood
628
52
70
80
80
Shorewood
629
489
660
775
790
Shorewood
632
0
0
0
0
City Totals 732 990 1160 1180
2000
2010 2020 1
2030
Retail
0
0 0
0
8
10 10
10
20
30 50
50
25
30 40
40
10
10 10
10
119
120 180
190
0
0 0
0
182 200 290 300
2000 2010 1 2020 1 2030
Non - Retail
0 0 0 0
0 0 5 5
110 145 155 160
28 45 45 45
42 60 70 70
370 540 595 600
0 0 0 0
550 790 870 880
2030 Forecasted Traffic - Shorewood & Vicinity
Source: Twin Cities Metropolitan Council
i
AV '
N
2030 - 28.000 ADT
• - 2030 - 16.000 ADT
rt
2030 - 39.000 ADT
4
_ T�
Chapter Summary
The Transportation chapter of the Comprehensive flan
contains goals, objectives and policies related to all aspects
of moving people and goods within the City of Shorewood.
The essential goals of this element of the plan are worth
repeating here:
transportation, The City shall provide and maintain a safe and efficient
system of
community. residents and the environment of the
The City should establish a plan for an interconnected
system of trails, enhancing the safe movement of
pedestrians, bicyclists and other non - motorized modes
of travel.
Based upon these goals, objectives and policies, several
recommendations are offered herein and can be
summarized as follows:
1. Develop streets based upon the Metropolitan
Council's Functional Classification System Criteria
for Roadways.
• Designate Country Club Road /Yellowstone
Trail/Lake Linden Drive as a minor collector
route
• Designate Minnetonka Boulevard as a minor
collector street
Recognize Vine Hill Road north of Covington
Road as a minor collector
2. Maintain criteria for when and how private streets
may be constructed.
3. Enforce design criteria (width, length of cul -de -sacs,
curbing, etc.) for new city streets.
4. Reconstruct existing streets to current widths but
not less than 20 feet.
5. Continue regulations that limit the extent of damage
done to city streets by garbage trucks.
11/09 TR -35
6. implement the recommendations of the 1986 and 1995 TA. 7 Corridor Studies with
particular attention being given to
0 Prepare alternative designs to the Galpin Lake Road intersection realignment
Study further the concept of a frontage road between Seamans Drive and Eureka
Road.
7. Coordinate the MSA system with the Functional Classification System:
9. Incorporate the Shorewood Trail Concept Plan recommendations into the review of all
development proposals and plans for street construction.
10. Continue working with neighborhoods to implement the trail planning process
established by the Park Commission.
11. Monitor the effectiveness of current snowmobile regulations.
11/09 TR -36
CoMn unity _EaEj!j!ies / e ices Plan m Chapter Qutfine
Introduction CF-1
Goals and Objectives ....... CF ®3
Issues . .... ........ ...... ....... CF-5
Policies ....... ...... .......... ........... ................ _ CF-9
Community Facilities/Services Plan....... ........... ...... ___ ... .... ...... ..... _ CF-15
SanitarySewer ....................................................................... ....................... CF-15
Capacity
Inflow/Infiltration
Televise Sewers
Sump Pumps - Connection to Sanitary Sewer
Existing On-Site Systems
WaterSystem .................................................................................................. CF-16
Background - Existing System
Reference Comprehensive Water Study - 1990
Reference Water Survey
Future Extensions
Policy Re: New Development
StormSewer .................................................................................................... CF-21
Reference Comprehensive Storm Water Study - 1975
Special Taxing Districts
Storm Water Utility
Water Quality - Design of Detention Ponds
Coordination With Watershed Districts
Parks and Recreation ....................................................................................... CF-25
Classification of Parks
Trails (See Transportation Plan)
Park Master Plans
Implementation Strategy
11/09
Public Safety ... _____—...... --'.~-----.~-------------C F-34
Police
Fire
Emergency Response Services
Solid Waste .... --- ............ -- ........... --.............. — ~~......... --...
Recycling
Refuse Handling
Street Lights, Natural Gas, Electrical, and Cable Television Scrvicoo—.. .... CF-34
Mun i ________________-------------. CF-36
City Offic
Public Works Garage
Senior Center
Schonl------------------------------------Cy-36
ll/09
Introduction
Public and semipublic facilities should be well planned and
developed to serve as a good example for private
development and for the general enjoyment of the public.
Proper community facilities and services at a reasonable per
capita cost are essential to the physical, social, economic
and cultural well being of the community. It is necessary
that adequate plans and provisions be made for the various
community facilities which will be demanded by the
citizens of Shorewood in the future. Of particular
importance is the procurement of necessary land before
values become higher resulting in a greater public expense;
land must also be secured before it is usurped for homes or
other private uses not in conformance with the City's
comprehensive development plan.
The purpose of this chapter is to identify existing needs and
the foreseeable future needs of the City. This chapter also
presents a plan for the type, location and proper relationship
and compatibility with general community development.
The community facilities plan is not concerned with
detailed schemes of development, operation, or programs of
the various uses, rather, this plan is offered as a general
framework within which detailed plans and specific
decisions regarding community facilities can be made.
Because of the size, location, and proposed density of
Shorewood, the City will not need such a diversity of
community facilities required by a more isolated
community. An array of social, cultural, and recreational
facilities of the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area are available
for use by the residents of Shorewood. It would not be
feasible, practical, or even desirable for the City to attempt
provision of facilities such as a convention hall, elaborate
community service park, zoo, public auditorium, or similar
facilities. It will, however, be necessary to provide certain
uses for local residents that cannot and will not be offered
11/09 CF -1
by other governmental or private agencies. it should be realized that, due to the
interrelationships between all of the south shore communities, many community _f=acilities and
services are most efficiently and economically provided on a joint basis.
The following section of the report contains proposals for a comprehensive system of community
facilities consistent with proposals for population density, land use, transportation systems, and
the City's own desire to create a high service level of such facilities.
11/09 CF -2
Community
Facilities/Services
Goals and Objectives
Community Facilities/Services Goals
The City shall provide those basic facilities and services
that ensure the health, safety and general welfare of the
public, the cost of which facilities and services are most
efficiently shared by the general public.
The efforts of varying government agencies shall be
coordinated to avoid duplication of efforts, unnecessary
expense and improper location of public facilities.
Maintain a sound financial planning program for capital
improvements, relating such improvements to actual need,
proper location and timing.
Community Facilities/ Services Objectives
Existing services are to be maintained and improved
where needed.
2. New community facilities and services are to be
developed to meet the needs and interests of the
Shorewood community.
Public facilities and services are to be planned and
provided in a comprehensive coordinated and
economic fashion.
4. Full utilization of existing facilities and services is
to be accomplished prior to additional investment.
5. Implement policies to provide city water service
where financially feasible and where demand can be
demonstrated.
6. Facilities and services on a joint -use basis between
units of government is to be promoted and
increased.
11/09 CF-3
Each individual in the community is to be assured safe, equitable and easy access to
public facilities and services.
Shorewood residents are to continue to have safe, reliable energy services to meet their
needs.
9. Energy service conservation is to be constantly promoted and facilitated.
11/09 CF -4
Community
Facilities/ Services
Sanitary Sewer
Virtually the entire community is served by the municipal
sewer system, or has sanitary sewer availability. With
minor exceptions future extensions to the system will be
paid for by private development. Capacity issues raised in
the past have been resolved.
Rate increases by the Metropolitan Waste Control
Commission reinforce the need to control inflow and
infiltration into the existing system. Consequently, repair
and routine maintenance of the system will be a priority in
coming years.
Water System
Despite an increased interest in the last several years, the
majority of residents do not feel that a city -wide water
system is desirable or economically feasible at this time.
As a result, future planning must focus on determining
where demand exists for city water and finding ways to
provide it as inexpensively as possible.
Major physical deficiencies in the overall system have been
resolved with the interconnection of the Amesbury and
Southeast Area components. Also, the Woodhaven well
has been decommissioned, with residents previously served
by that system now being comlected to the Chanhassen
water system.
Shorewood's current system includes basic treatment (e.g.
fluoride and chlorine). While drinking water quality
standards are currently being met in the system, there will
likely come a time when additional treatment becomes
necessary to satisfy increasingly demanding health
regulations. This would necessitate construction of one or
more treatment plants. Future planning should explore this
issue further, including potential siting for such facilities.
Nearly one -half of the community still relies on private
wells for water service. Occasionally, the City becomes
11/09 CF -5
aware of issues with these privates systems. Methods should be identified for educating and
communicating with residents when these problems arise.
Stor water Management
While new development in recent years has been required to address stormwater runoff, many
older parts of the community experience drainage problems. The City has adopted a program for
funding stormwater management projects. Having completed its Surface Water Management
Plan, the City's focus now turns to implementation of the Plan.
In the past attention has been paid primarily to the quantity of stormwater runoff. Environmental
concerns dictate that future stormwater management also address the quality of stormwater
runoff. Finally, stormwater volume will become an issue in the future.
Having acquired most of the land identified as being needed for a park system, considerable
planning has gone into the development of various parks. Master plans exist for all of the parks
in Shorewood and the City has adopted a trail planning process for the community. The City has
commissioned an update of the master plans, which should be completed later this year. The
challenge for the future is to finance proposed park improvements and projects resulting from the
trail planning process.
Public Safety
Sharing police and fire services with other South Lake Minnetonka communities and the City of
Mound has proven to be effective and economical, and Shorewood remains committed to these
joint use efforts. Previous concerns related to volunteer staffing have been resolved due, at least
in part, to vastly improved public safety facilities and effective recruitment measures.
Solid Waste
Shorewood began its recycling efforts in 1990 and has experienced a relatively high rate of
participation from residents. In addition to increased collection, future efforts should be made to
use recycled products.
Refuse collection has been identified as contributing to the deterioration of City streets. Garbage
trucks, while providing an essential service, are among the heaviest vehicles on the road. In
response to increasing street repair costs, the City has established organized collection as a way
to reduce the number of trips made by haulers.
Natural Gas, Electrical and Cable Television Services
These semipublic utility services are available throughout most of Shorewood. Shorewood's
participation in the "Gopher State One -Call" program has enhanced communication between the
City, private contractors and the utility companies relative to construction projects. Refinement
of permitting procedures and a program to bury existing overhead utilities are viewed as future
issues to be addressed.
11/09 CF -6
Municipal uil in s
Shorewood`s City Hall has been expanded in the last several ears and a new public works
facility was constructed in 1992, With a current renovation and expansion of City Hall, these
facilities are viewed as adequate to meet the future needs of Shorewood.
addition The recent o and remodeling • sho
additional future. The School District has not identified future
11/09 CF -7
Community
Facilities/Services
Parks and Recreational Open Space
Shorewood's park and recreational open space
system shall be classified in accordance with
standards established by the Metropolitan Council.
2. The allocation of funds for park improvements for
specific facilities will be made on the basis of
balancing overall community park needs with the
specific needs of each facility.
The community shall provide for an appropriate
balance among active, passive, and cultural
recreational areas and activities, tailored to the
needs of the total population.
4. Recreational facilities and a year -round program of
activities suited to the varied recreational needs of
all age groups within the community shall be
provided.
Parks and recreational facilities shall be distributed
throughout the community, based upon
neighborhood needs and characteristics of each
planning and development district.
6. Sufficient park land to fulfill the needs of the
present and projected future population of the
community shall be acquired and reserved. Park
development shall be undertaken as residential
development demands and as funds are available.
7. Recreational open space improvements shall be
programmed in accordance with a capital
improvement program, updated on an annual basis.
Parks shall be designed and maintained with proper
lighting, landscaping, shelter design, etc., to ensure
a high degree of public safety and protection of
public property.
11/09 CF -9
Table 4
CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM FOR LOCAL AND REGIONAL RECREATION OPEN SPACE
Component Use
Service Area Site
Physiography suited for Proximity to elementary
Intense development. schools.
O
to 5,000
(neighborhood).
3 -5 neighborhoods 25 -50 acres
(community *).
Local Facilities
Mini -Park
Specialized facilities that serve a concentrated
Less than 1/4 mile Less than 1 acre.
or limited population or specific group such as
radius.
tots or senior citizens; may be in locations such
as apartment complexes, townhouse
developments or commercial centers.
Neighborhood
Area for Intense recreational activities such as
1/4 to 1/2 mile 10 -25 acres
Park /Playground
field games, court games, crafts, apparatus
radius to serve a
area, skating, neighborhood centers.
population of 4,000
Community Playfield Area for intense recreational facilities such as
athletic fields and swimming pools; could
include neighborhood use.
Community Park Area of natural or ornamental quality for
outdoor recreation such as walking viewing,
sitting, picnicking; could have some field and
court games.
Conservancy Lands Area of natural quality such as watercourses
and wetlands that are preserved for
environmental or aesthetic benefits to the
community and /or because of the negative
environmental or economic effects of
development in them.
3 -5 neighborhoods 25 -50 acres
(community*).
r
Physiography suited for
Intense development.
Affords natural features
with varied
physlographic Interest.
Proximity to secondary
schools and other
public facilities.
Proximity to community
facilities and resources.
Municipality, Variable, based on extent Natural resources that Where resource occurs.
township, county. of resources. merit preservation and
that would be negatively
affected by
development.
*A grouping of
neighborhoods, not
a unit of
government.
Table 4 (cont.)
Component Use Service Area
Regional Facilities
n
i
Regional Park Area of natural or ornamental quality for nature- 3 -5 communities*
oriented outdoor recreation such as picnicking,
boating, fishing, swimming, camping and trail
uses.
Regional Park Areas of natural quality for nature - oriented County,
Reserve outdoor recreation such as viewing and multi -county area.
studying nature, wildlife habitat, conservation,
swimming, picnicking, hiking, boating, camping
and trail uses.
Local or Regional
200 -500 acres (100 -acre Complete natural setting Where natural resource
Site Site Attributes Site Locatlon
minimum).
contiguous to water occurs -- particularly
and/or natural linear
bodies or water courses water,
resources such as utility
where possible.
1000+ acres; sufficient
Diversity of unique Where resource occurs.
area to encompass the
resources, such as
resource envisioned for
topography, lakes
preservation.
streams, marshes, flora,
accomplish purpose.
fauna.
Utilize human -made
Where linear resource
and/or natural linear
occurs. Link
resources such as utility
components of
corridors, rights -of -way
recreation system. Link
drainage ways, bluff
other community
lines, vegetation
facilities such as
patterns and roads.
schools, library and
accomplish purpose.
commercial areas.
Appropriate to particular
Where most
special feature.
advantageous for the
applicable to desired
special feature and the
overall park systern.
Linear Park (trails, Area developed for one or more varying modes
Local
Sufficient width to provide
corridors, parkways) of.recreationai travel such as hiking, biking,
(municipalities,
maximum protection of
snowmobiling, horseback riding, crosscountry
townships) or
resource and maximum
skiing, canoeing and driving,
regional (county,
use; sufficient length to
multicounty area).
accomplish purpose.
Special Features Area that preserves, maintains and provides
Metropolitan Area.
Specific standard
specialized or single - purpose recreational
applicable to desired
activities such as golf course, nature center,
feature.
marina, zoo, conservatory, arboretum, display
gardens, arena, gun club, downhill ski area,
and sites of historic or archaeological
significance.
*A grouping of
neighborhoods, not a
unit of government.
9. Where necessary parks shall be screened, fenced and /or buffered for the safety and
protection of the user as well as actiacent property owners.
10. Parks shall be improved and developed to take maximum advantage of natural features of
the Shorewood.
11. Safe and convenient pedestrian, bicycle and vehicular access and adequate parking to
serve recreational facilities shall be provided.
13. Park and open space facilities and programming shall be planned and developed in
cooperation and coordinated with similar services of surrounding communities, the
school district, private organizations and the metropolitan area as a whole.
14. Studies on a periodic basis shall be undertaken to analyze the effectiveness and
comprehensiveness of the community recreation program. These studies should serve as
the basis for recreation open space plamling and programming.
15. Continual citizen participation in the planning, development and operation of recreational
open space shall be maintained.
Lakeshore Use
Lake Minnetonka shall be considered a community recreational facility and appropriate
actions shall be taken to permit utilization of the lake by all City residents.
2. Regulations shall be enforced to ensure accessibility to area lakes while at the same time
minimizing any potential impact on surrounding uses and adjacent property owners.
In order to protect and preserve the amenity provided by area lakes, the City shall
encourage uniform land use regulation and enforcement of Lakeshore use.
Governmental Buildings and Facilities
Cooperation and coordination shall be promoted and actively pursued between
governmental units in the provision of public facilities and services.
2. The full utilization of investments in public facilities and services shall be achieved prior
to making new public investments.
Public facilities and services shall be located to the greatest extent possible so as to offer
ease of access and minimal response time.
4. All public facilities shall be developed, improved and maintained according to the highest
adopted standards of design and performance to serve as examples for private
development.
11/09 CF -12
All public buildings ,shall be designed and maintained to be safe, secure and resistant to
vandalism while maximizing public and city usability.
6. Those areas, places, buildings, structures and other objects such as Indian mounds having
significant architectural, historical, community or aesthetic interests and values shall be
restored and preserved, as defined under the Minnesota Historic Sites Act of 1965, as
may be amended.
7. Adequate screening, landscaping, and buffering of facilities shall be accomplished in
order to minimize their impact on surrounding uses and enhance the community and areas
in which they are located.
Public and Sernipublic Utilities
City public utilities will be reviewed at the same time that the Capital Improvement
Program is reviewed each year.
2. Demand for urban services shall be anticipated, with emphasis to conserving existing
facilities, in order to facilitate orderly, fiscally responsible extension of service systems.
Easements for utility systems shall be located according to uniform standards, providing
for ease of access for maintenance and repair and minimal disruption of other activities or
areas.
4. All utility systems and possible utility and service needs shall be periodically monitored
and all existing systems shall be maintained to assure a safe and high quality standard of
service on an ongoing basis.
5. The impact of required utility facilities and services shall be minimized upon surrounding
uses.
6. Underground installation of all new utility services shall be required and when
economically feasible, existing overhead systems shall be converted to underground.
7. Coordination among all utility improvement programs shall be constantly pursued.
Telecommunication facilities shall utilize existing tower structures where feasible.
9. On -site disposal and treatment systems shall be phased out where possible and the
installation of new systems shall be prohibited. Gravity sewer systems are to be
encouraged, and sewer lift stations should only be allowed when it is technically
infeasible to achieve gravity flow.
10. Separate sanitary and storm sewer systems shall be maintained.
11. Run -off shall be managed to protect the groundwater recharge areas.
11/09 CF -13
12. Benefiting property owners shall assume the burden of improvements made by the City III
their behalf.
13. Natural drainage shall be preserved to the extent possible in order to minimize storm
sewer costs.
14. Commercial development shall provide adequate water systems to insure proper fire
protection.
Encourage use of alternative energy forms in new construction.
2. Continue to disseminate information on governmental energy conservation programs and
helpful ideas on personal energy conservation methods.
Where practical, promote overall energy conservation in the community development
process.
11/09 CF -14
Community
Facilities/Services
Plan
Sanitary Sewer
Although limitations on the metropolitan sewer system
resulted in brief sewer capacity problems for Shorewood in
the mid 1980's, those issues have since been resolved,
primarily through expansion of the regional interceptor
system. Consequently, Shorewood's sewer system is
considered to be adequate to handle all future development
as projected in the Land Use chapter of the Comprehensive
Plan.
Given the availability of sewer in Shorewood, and the fact
that any remaining extensions to the system will be
installed through private land development, the City's focus
has turned to maintenance and upgrading of the existing
system.
Control of inflow and infiltration (I /1) of clear water into
the sanitary sewer remains an ongoing problem. I/1 occurs
when ground water leaks into the system through broken
seals in joints, or when stormwater is diverted to the
sanitary sewer system from building sumps and rain gutter
leads. Aside from environmental concerns, sewage
treatment of clear water on a regional level is costly and has
resulted in inordinate charges to Shorewood by
Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES).
Shorewood has committed itself to reducing 1 /I. A three -
year program was initiated in 1989 to reduce 1/1 in
suspected problem areas of the City. Older sections of the
system located in wet soils were televised, sealed and
11/09 CF -15
The City requires that all new development connect to the sanitary sewer system. Although new
on -site septic systems are prohibited, a small number of systems remain in existence. These
systems have been identified and, where feasible, given notice to connect. With the exception of
homes on Gale Island and Spray Island, all riparian lots in Shorewood have now been connected
to city sewer. Regulations to this effect already exist within the City Code.
Remaining new segments of the municipal system will be constructed and paid for as part of
private development projects. Gravity sewer is to be encouraged, while lift stations are to be
allowed only when gravity service is technically and economically not feasible.
The map on the following page shows the Shorewood Sanitary sewer system and the network of
Met Council interceptor lines. The table on page LU -30 shows the Metropolitan Council's
forecasts for households, population and employment. Based on the those forecasts, estimated
wastewater flows, by interceptor, are shown in five -year increments through 2030 in the
following table.
Future Wastewater Flows by Met Council Interceptor
Interceptor
Existing
2010 Avg.
2015 Avg.
2020 Avg.
2025 Avg.
2030 Avg.
Avg. Flow
Flow (MGD
Flow (MGD)
Flow (MGD)
Flow (MGD)
Flow (MGD).
MGD
7017
.475
.479
.495
.509
.522
.534
7017 -1
.061
.061
.061
.061
.061
.061
7017 -2
.023
.023
.023
.024
.024
.024
7017 -3
.053
.054
.054
.055
.055
.055
7017 -4
.008
.008
.008
.008
.008
.008
6 -DH -645
.046
.046
.046
.046
.046
.046
6- DH -645A
.038
.039
.039
.039
.039
.039
6 -G W -649
.023
.023
.023
.023
.023
.023
6 -MT -647
.031
.031
.031
.031
.031
.031
6 -TB -661
.008
.008
.008
.008
.008
.008
Total
.766
.772
.788
.804
.817
.829
Municipal Water
Shorewood's municipal water system consists of two separate systems, including six wells, as
shown on page CF -19. Approximately 52 percent of the households in Shorewood are connected
to the system. In 1984 the City prepared a Comprehensive Water Study to serve as a guide for
the development of an overall system. The Study was updated in 1990 and again in 1996 after
which the City initiated a plan for extending water throughout the community over a ten to
twenty -year period.
11/09 CF -16
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
I Camp Ct
EbedPt
vw , Cr
CneSVMt Tar
Owsr" et
NclmM, Cr
A
0 1,000 2.000 4.000
Feet
a m Shorewood Planning Department
12/09
Sanitary Sewer System
6 -DH -645 Sanitary Lines
6- DH -645A Type
6 -GW -649
Gravity Main
6 -MT -647
- —►— Force Main
6 -TB -661
MWCC Lines Source: Metropolitan Council and
CF -17 Shorewood Record Drawings - San Sewer
Z ram view ur
(Lake Nlinneeashta)
Metro Interceptors
7017 -4
7017
C
7017 -1
7017 -2
7017 -3
7017 -4
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
1 Cowvg Ct
2 Ebert Pt
3V*-., Cn
4 Chesm L! Te
5 ch b u[ Ct
6 M 4y Ca
2P-d Vi—D, (Lake Nlinnewashta)
Watermains
0 1,000 2.000 4.000
Feet
Shorewood Planning Department
05/09
Existing Watermain
.A. Fire Hydrant
CF -19
Since then the City Council has determined that the majority of Shorewood residents did riot
support such an aggressive approach to the construction of a citywide ,system. Consequently, the
direction at this time is to concentrate on making the existing systern as reliable and financially
viable as possible, and to serve residents where demand can be demonstrated.
The City's water policies and codes have been updated based upon the following guidelines:
The City will continue to examine ways to provide water as economically as possible. Future
planning should include the preparation of engineering estimates for various logical extensions of
water main. These estimates should be updated annually to advise residents of approximate
water costs. Feasibility studies will be prepared based upon interest. Water main extension
should be considered in all projects, providing adequate right -of -way, if nothing else. Finally,
the City should explore the demand for water in conjunction with all street reconstruction
projects.
Storm Sewer
In 1975 the City prepared a Comprehensive Storm Water Study which identified 16
subwatershed districts within the community (see page CF -23). The Purgatory Creek drainage
district and part of the Carson Bay district is located in the Riley- Purgatory -Bluff Creek
Watershed. The remaining 15 drainage districts are located within the Minnehaha Creek
Watershed. While the study proposed substantial reliance on natural drainage systems,
particularly the preservation and use of wetlands, a number of areas were proposed to be served
by storm sewer. New development has, for the most part, been required to install storm water
drainage facilities consistent with the 1975 study.
The 1975 Study has been completely updated with the adoption of the Surface Water
Management Plan (SWMP), adopted earlier this year. The SWMP has been developed to meet
local watershed management planning requirements of the Metropolitan Surface Water
Management Act and Board of Water and Soil Resources. It has been developed to be in
conformance with the requirements of the local Watershed Districts, Metropolitan Council
requirements, and applicable State and Federal laws. Its intent is to provide the City with
direction concerning the administration and implementation of water resource activities within
the community. This study is based upon more detailed topographic information acquired by the
11/09 CF -21
City. The plan analyzes some of Shorewood's more significant drainage problems and
recommends management policies consistent with local Watershed District guidelines.
The SWMP serves as a basis for the City's preparation of its Storrawater Pollution prevention
Program (SWPPP) which is necessary to comply with the National. Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES).
Certain areas which developed prior to storm water management planning have experienced
drainage problems which have been difficult and expensive to correct. The City relies on a two -
part program to address drainage problems:
A stormwater management utility has been established, funds from which are used
in two ways. A portion of the annual revenue from the utility is set aside for large
drainage projects. The remaining funds are used on an annual basis for
maintenance or small drainage projects. Projects will be prioritized and
programmed based on the following criteria:
a. Public Safety and Health. Primary attention will be paid to those projects
that impact the public health or safety. These projects include ice
problems on the road, erosion that is causing a hazardous structural
problem (i.e. undermining a road), or storm water that is causing a
significant health problem (such as flooding the sanitary system).
b. Substantial Financial Impact to the City. This category includes those
projects that, while not endangering the public health, will still have a
negative impact on the residents as a whole. Projects in this category
include minor infrastructure replacement that cannot be funded cost
effectively by other means. Other potential projects include erosion
causing property damage and minor structure replacement.
Public Nuisance. This category includes those projects that cannot be
considered a substantial hazard, are not likely to cause a financial loss to
the City, but are a public nuisance. These projects include standing water
in the roadway, unwanted flooding in public parks, and minor erosion
proj ects.
d. Private Nuisance. Finally, those projects that are a nuisance to a single
residence or small group of residences that the City Council deems that the
City has some responsibility to help correct. These projects include those
instances where a large drainage area is causing a problem to a small area,
and the homeowners are willing to grant a right of entry to City crews
without cost.
2. Special taxing districts have been identified based upon the 16 subwatersheds.
Stormwater improvement projects within those districts are financed as follows:
70 percent from an ad valorem tax on properties within the district
30 percent from the stormwater management utility
11/09 CF -22
,urainage Districts
L Purgatory Creek 9. Central
2, Carson Bay 10. South - Central
= 1 Lake William 11, bake innewas to
r 4. St. Albans Bay 12 North - Central —
/
Clzrlstas Lake 13 West
- Central -
ii
6, Galpin Lake 14, Lake Virginia -
7. Gideon Bay 15. West -
%.% & Lake Mary 16. Islands
-` c `'' fro - I`` ac G,...'- .>._,=- i it ✓ eaoeo -•-- -,
OROiJO ,/ '� - f� +l dj F.- _ r.G p _, - �� //, r ._H �s h
_
_ - "' F
I,
¢I r
z
Lokc Yinnetonke
P
C�
1 P 0r9a
,� -1-; �Q- -
CF -23
New development will continue to be required to manage its st.or water runoff based upon the
principle that the rate of runoff leaving a site after development will not exceed the rate prior to
development.
While Shorewood has addressed the issue of water quantity in recent years, the quality of
stormwater runoff has become a topic of concern. This issue is addressed in the Natural
Resources chapter of this Plan.
Parks and Recreation
At present the park system contains approximately 100 acres of what is considered usable land.
A large amount of land that has been dedicated as park property is not considered to be suitable
for park development. The unusable land is comprised of wetlands which because of location or
size offer little possibility at present, other than open space.
Shorewood's park system is shown on the page CF -27. Seven sites constitute the core of the
present system. These are:
Cathcart Park (in Chanhassen, but owned by Shorewood) 4.8 acres
Freeman Park
67.8 acres
Badger Park (including City Hall)
10.2 acres
Crescent Beach (joint -use with Tonka Bay)
.4 acres
Manor Park
4.5 acres
Silverwood Park
8.1 acres
Merry Lane Access
.5 acres
South Shore Community Park (Skate Park)
3.4 acres
In addition to these parks, other recreational facilities exist, including a playground at the
Minnewashta Elementary School and a semipublic golf course on the south side of Smithtown
Road, west of Country Club Road. Several old fire lanes which have been held by the City also
provide limited recreational opportunities to various neighborhoods. As mentioned in the
Transportation Chapter, the City has also adopted a Trails Planning process.
These existing sites are considered adequate to meet the future needs of Shorewood. With the
exception of the islands and a small pocket south of Galpin Lake, most areas are within a one -
half to one -mile radius of neighborhood park facilities. As such, the focus of future park
plamring will be on developing the parks, as opposed to acquiring more land. One exception to
this is Freeman Park. Some of the local athletic organizations have expressed interest in possibly
expanding facilities in Freeman Park. The City should remain open to organization - supported
expansion on the south end of the park as well as at other existing sites as need dictates and
funding will allow. Also, as land becomes available, through tax forfeiture or vacation of public
right -of -way for example, it should be examined for recreational opportunities. Two such sites
are the old wayside rests located on the north and south sides of Highway 7 west of Old Market
Road.
11/09 CF -25
The City has commissioned a master plan update for the park system. The Plan should be done
this year and will include an analysis of the existing parks and recommendations for updating
them.
The City should continue to work with adjacent communities and the School District to maintain
a clear understanding of the total recreational needs of the area. The south shore area has a
highly cooperative recreational and transportation system which requires constant coordination
(playfields, parks and trails).
The Park Commission and City Council should continue to monitor the needs of area residents
in implementing its parks and recreation plan. For example, considerable interest in trails has
been generated in the last several years.
11/09 CF -26
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
I�
Smithtown
Bay
Lake Minnetonka
Upper Lake
Re Virginia)
Cathcart Park
N
A
' 0 1,000 2,000 4,000
Feet
89 Shorewood Planning Department
05/09
Zre "scent Beach
1 Perk Lane
2 Pond Va -Or (Lake NIianeAashta)
0 City Park
Public Open Space
►\ �a�,`��•� \ \ 1 III _ ` � ` � PO���S ��`�?,�
Park
%o 1111
"�. M M
`,
owl
'. A � �, a
CF -27
WEST
6211D sracEr
CU
Me
N
x
Hockey
Shelter
Open Skating
Y/P 1 n 1 ,Area,
i '
R
,Little League Bafiffeld
T,—
Open Play Area
' To
IN
Cathcart Park
V 'j I
"1, p, 4
Master Plan
ilOflTn
11-93 CF-29
1—+
Freeman Park
W
J
'L
L i
G!
Parking
21 Siatle
—
ya �
I
'L
t
J
'L
L i
G!
Parking
21 Siatle
—
ya �
I
J
'L
L i
G!
Parking
21 Siatle
—
ya �
i
0
a
0
z
0
0
U
13
11 0 ,
Master Plan
flORTFi
Badger Park
11 -93
CF -31
Master Plan
NORTH
Mant"Ar Park
11 -93
CF -32
0
90
o `
as L�
i�
1
s ;x �
m
i r o
� I
11 -93 CF -33
Solid Waste
As mentioned in the Transportation Chapter, garbage trucks have been identified as inflicting
more damage to city streets than any other type of vehicle. In response to this issue the City
examined several alternatives, ranging from simply requiring the use of smaller satellite trucks,
to municipal refuse collection.
It was determined that the most cost - effective solution is to license refuse haulers, limiting
pickups to one specified day of the week, eliminating the presence of curbside refuse on the
remaining days.
Natural Gas, Electrical Service, Cable Television and Street Lighting
All areas of the community are currently serviced by natural gas, electricity and cable television
service, or have them available. As such, provision of these services will not influence
development in Shorewood. The thrust of these efforts should be concentrated toward
elimination of overhead wiring. It is recommended that in reviewing development requests the
City should require, where practical, the underground placement of all utilities. In previously
developed areas, plans for placement of underground utilities should be incorporated with future
roadway improvements. The City may also want to initiate a more aggressive program for
systematically eliminating overhead wiring within the next 10 to 15 years.
11/09 CF -34
BASE MAP LEGEND
PLATTED STREET OR RAILROAD CORRIDOP
PLATTED STREET, NOT BUILT
- - -- --. BUILT STREET, NOT RATTED (CENTER LINE
VACATED STREET
LOT LINE (BETWEEN LOTS UNDER SEPARATE OWWRSHIPI
- LOT LNE (BETWEEN LOTS UNDER COMMON OWNERSHIP)
- -..- SECT" AND V2 SECTION LINE, SECTION NUMBER
CITY BOLF40mr
SHORELINE
I
_ I
PWLPS BAY \
I
- I
I
I
�4 -A_ I
i SHADY ISLAND PT 1 SPR..4Y
2 SHADY ISLAND TR I
3 SHADY ISLAND CIR I
FID
'I
SHAO (SLAW
'� I ' LAKE MINNETONKIJ
I -ice I
_ i I ( UPPER LAKE)
- --
mil? pw -
Dry Hydrant Locations
anted Island and Shady Island
11 -93 CF -35
�
N
_
GOOSE ISLAND
w
8
_
F
4-
I
- I
I
I
�4 -A_ I
i SHADY ISLAND PT 1 SPR..4Y
2 SHADY ISLAND TR I
3 SHADY ISLAND CIR I
FID
'I
SHAO (SLAW
'� I ' LAKE MINNETONKIJ
I -ice I
_ i I ( UPPER LAKE)
- --
mil? pw -
Dry Hydrant Locations
anted Island and Shady Island
11 -93 CF -35
�
N
_
GOOSE ISLAND
I
- I
I
I
�4 -A_ I
i SHADY ISLAND PT 1 SPR..4Y
2 SHADY ISLAND TR I
3 SHADY ISLAND CIR I
FID
'I
SHAO (SLAW
'� I ' LAKE MINNETONKIJ
I -ice I
_ i I ( UPPER LAKE)
- --
mil? pw -
Dry Hydrant Locations
anted Island and Shady Island
11 -93 CF -35
Residents appear to be split on the issue of street lighting, Consequently, no comprehensive
program of installing street lights is suggested. The City has adopted the following policies in
response to neighborhood demands for street lighting:
2. Requests for street lighting. While requests will be considered from any resident,
it is recommended that a petition of neighboring residents be submitted with the
request.
3. Cost of street lighting. The City agrees to pay the cost of monthly electric service
for an authorized street light. It will not pay for the installation of the light or for
extending power to the proposed location of the light, or for any light other than a
standard street light.
Municipal Buildings
First built in 1981, then expanded in 1988, the City Administrative Offices are currently
undergoing renovation and expansion. Plans for the project include accessibility upgrades,
increased office space and a new Council Chambers.
The City completed construction of a new public works facility in 1992. In addition to a new
garage, a long- awaited salt /sand storage building was added. The facility has more and better
space for outdoor storage which has been screened from view of nearby residential property.
Although the garage was designed to be expanded, the facility is considered to be adequate to
serve the City's needs for years into the future.
Recognizing the needs of an increasing elderly population in the south shore communities, the
cities of Shorewood, Tonka Bay, Excelsior, Greenwood and Deephaven joined forces to
construct the Southshore Senior Community Center in the northeast corner of the Badger Field
site. Not only does this facility provide for the day to day activities of area seniors, but it also
provides much needed community meeting space.
Schools
With the exception of the islands, which are located in the Mound School District, the entire City
of Shorewood is located within the Minnetonka School District (276). Population growth in the
last several years has resulted in the need for expanded facilities throughout the District. In
Shorewood, the School District has acquired additional land to increase the size of the
Mirunewashta Elementary School site. The building was also expanded to meet the needs of
future growth. The School District has not identified any additional land or locations for new
facilities in Shorewood. Given the low density of the remaining land in the community, the need
for additional facilities in Shorewood is considered unlikely.
11/09 CF -36
Chapter m f
Community facilities and services include lands, buildings,
services and systems which are provided on a public or
semipublic basis. The City's goals in this regard are as
follows:
which ensure the health, safety and general welfare of
the public, the cost of which facilities and services are
most general public.
efforts The of varying government
coordinated 1 avoid duplication 1 efforts, unnecessa
expense 1 improper location of 1
Maintain a sound financial planning program for
capital improvements, relating such improvements to
actual need, proper location and timing.
Following is a summary of recommendations intended to
achieve these goals.
1. Administer policies to provide city water service
where demand can be demonstrated and where
technically and financially feasible.
2. Promote and increase the provision of facilities and
services on a joint -use basis between units of
government.
3. Continue to identify problem areas of the sanitary
sewer system for televising, sealing and repair.
4. Continue the sewer maintenance program including
manhole inspection and sewer flushing on a five
year cycle.
5. Allow sanitary sewer lift stations only when gravity
service is not technically and economically feasible.
6. Water extensions must be consistent with
Shorewood's Implementation Plan for Water
Distribution System Improvements, dated January
1996 and the "Ten States Standards ".
11/09 CF -37
T Prioritize small drainage projects based ono 1) public safety and health.; 2) substantial
financial impact to the City; 3) public nuisance; and 4) private nuisance.
8. Finance large drainage projects through special taxing districts based on established
subatersheds.
9. Stormwater runoff shall be managed consistent with the Surface Water Management
Plan, and based upon the principle that the rate of runoff leaving a site after development
shall not exceed the rate of runoff prior to development.
10. Focus future park planning on the development of existing sites rather than on acquisition
of land, but examine land which becomes available to the City for recreational
opportunities.
11. Consider enhancement of existing parks as funding allows.
12. Continue to coordinate recreational programs with other communities through the
Minnetonka School District.
13. Continue to provide police protection through the existing four -city joint powers
agreement.
14. Continue to provide fire protection services in cooperation with other Lake Minnetonka
communities.
15. License refuse haulers and limit days of collection to minimize damage to roads.
16. Require all new development to place all utilities underground and consider establishing a
program to eliminate overhead wiring over the next 10 to 15 years.
17. Provide street lighting only where consistent with adopted City policy.
11/09 CF -3 8
COUNCIL ACTION FORM
Mr. Michels contacted staff and Council regarding his concerns over the improvements made during the
Harding Lane street construction project |astsumme:Thespedficissueheraiseddeukwiththe
drainage improvements. The drainage improvements included clearing the brush and other vegetation
from the area, re-grading, deepening the holding area, removing the weir, reestablishing the berm, and
other improvements.
The information gathered indicates the storm water system, including the holding pond behind 5565
and 5570 was part of the Harding Acres plat, and was installed when the original road was constructed.
The information from VV3B prepared in 2009 indicates the work on the storm water would be limited to
restoring the system to its original 1985 design.
Staff prepared a chronology for the Council and attached it to this memorandum. The chronology covers
the preliminary plat through the road project.
Recommendation
Staff again suggests plantings to screen the drainage area and create a buffer area.
Council Action:
Harding Brief Summary of Events
Related to
The planning commission held a public hearing on the preliminary plat for the
development to take place in phases, the first phase contemplated the development
seven (7) of 18 homes along the existing street, on October 16, 1984. The commissi
recommended approval of the preliminary plat to the Council. I
- council took i the preliminary plat issue on • - •e 19, 1984 and approved the
preliminary plat contingent to the development maintaining the 20,000 sq.ft. lot minimum,
acceptance of the drainage plan, no access to Glen Road, and dedication of 5' along
`•R'..R•• Road for ROW.
The council approved the final plat for Harding Acres on February 25, 1985 in
accordance with the seven recommendations set by city planner Nielsen and in
accordance with the engineer's letter dated February 19, 1985. The review by the city
engineer — Orr, Schelen, Mayeron, and Associates states in part "Due to the grading
required for the storm water storage pond, the building envelop for Lot 5 [the subject
property] is quite small. At the same time, the storm water storage pond should be
somewhat larger to insure that runoff after development does not exceed runoff prior to
development." Emphasis added.
• The Planning Commission again recommended approval of the Harding Acres Second
Addition preliminary and final plat on April 1, 1986 due to failure by the developer to
record the documents in a timely manner.
• Construction process for home on Lot 5 began in 1989. Letter in file from builder
acknowledges the small lot for the house, that a future rear deck may not be feasible.
Surveyors certificate of August 10, revised August 24, 1989 shows the proposed house
in relation to the existing easement.
• March 1, 1991 OSM, the city's engineer, issued a letter to Planner Nielsen indicating
concerns about the lot grading as it relates to the original grading plan submitted and
approved as part of the approved final plat.
• Certificate of Occupancy issued by the City on April 12, 1991 contingent on providing a
design for correcting the drainage easement within 30 days and providing corrections to
the drainage easement within 60 days of issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy.
May 31, 1991 letter from CSM stating that the plans submitted by the builders engineer
will bring the pond back into agreement with the original TK A. plans.
Engineer James Landini received a drainage complaint from the downstream residents
in 2007. Upon review of the area, Mr. Landini observed visible deterioration of the berm
and missing boards on the wier structure.
• The reconstruction of Harding Lane was discussed and placed on the Capital
Improvement Plan in 2008 and work on feasibility for water and other preliminary studies
began in 2009, this included the creation of a mailing list of affected residents.
• Engineer Landini created address labels from property records provided by Hennepin
County in January 2009.
• The first public meeting on the project held January 27, 2009.
• James mailed information out to those residents who didn't attend or make the public
meeting February 2, 2009.
• Mr. Michels contacted James via phone in March 2009.
• Council authorization to finalize plans and specifications May 26, 2009, James hand
delivered notices to each address.
• Notice of public hearing on project mailed to owners address of record May 28, 2009.
• James e- mailed Mr. Michels notice of public hearing June 2, 2009.
• June 4 and June 11, 2009 notice of public hearing appeared in Sun Sailor.
• June 6, 2009, Hennepin County received tax mailing address change for 5570 Harding
Lane.
• June 22, 2009 Harding public hearing for Mater Main and notices hand delivered to
residents.
• June 25, 2009 James held road project meeting with residents.
• James met with resident of 5565 Harding Lane to discuss pond, July 29, 2009 bids set
plans.
a August 3, 2009, James staked the pond area for 5565 at the home owner's request.
• August 19, 2009 bids opened and on August 24, 2009 Council awarded the bid.
• September 3, 2009, pond cleanout letter written.
• September 3, 2009, James met with project inspector to look over and discuss pond and
pond plans distributed to pond residents doors.
• James e- mailed pond cleanout to Mr. Michels on September 4, 2009. The e -mail
included the plans.
• September 4, 2009, Harding Lane preconstruction meeting and received construction
schedule.
• Update on the project posted on the City's web site listing the construction schedule on
September 4, 2009.
• James held another pond meeting with the owner of 5590 Harding Lane on September
8, 2009.
• April 8, 2010, James received a phone call complaint about the pond in backyard of
5570.
• April —May 2010, several a -mails and documents sent between Mr. Michels and the city
regarding the situation.
• May 20, 2010, 1 met with Mr. Michels and discussed the issue and outlined the process
for the Council meeting.
Attachments for the summary indude the tollowr ng:
MINUTES
T
REGULAR _U
LAR COUNC MEETING
MON., NOV. 19, 1 o84
page three
* BOND SALE AWARDED
RESOLUTION NO. - 83-84
Mr. Stanon recommended the Council award the bid to Norwest Bank of
Minneapolis. This is a 15 year bond to mature from 1986 through 2001,
and the bank will act as a registrar.
Gagne moved, seconded by Haugen to award the bid to Norwest Bank of
Minneapolis as recommended. Motion approved by roll call vote - 5 ayes.
COUNCIL BREAK 8:25 - 8:30 PM
PRELIMINARY PLAT - HARDING ACRES RESOLUTION NO. 84-84
A presentation of the proposed Harding Acres subdivision was given by
Mr. Otto. The division will contain 20,000 square foot lots with
100 feet of road footage for each lot as required in the R-2 zoning of
that area. He is requesting a phased development, first phase will
consist of 7 lots, all fronting an existing road. The developer will
have to extend sewer lines further north on Wedgewood Road to service
the lots that will have frontage there. He also has agreed to dedicate
5 feet in width along the front of Wedgewood Road to add to the
existing 40 foot width, 5 feet will also be requested if the property on
the west side of Wedgewobd Road develops. Mr. Otto indicated that he
was agreeable to putting in a cul-de-sac or a through-street as the
planner suggested.
Council questioned the through-street onto Glen Road as opposed to a
cul-de-sac for better access of emergency vehicles and snow plowing.
Concern from area residents were expressed regarding maintaining 20,000
square foot lot size as stated by Chuck Amlaw. The largest opposition
came regarding opening Glen Road through onto the road within this new
project. Bob McDougall, Roger Fischback, Ralph Hatch, Lori Lindberg
and Frank Mara were some of the residents that did not want the road
opened to through traffic. Some of the concerns were speeding, safety
of pedestrians, need to widen existing street thus requiring the
removal of trees, additional traffic problems at County Road 19 and
miscellaneous other problems.
Haugen suggested a "crash gate" for emergency purposes, the residents
did not feel this serves a good purpose, and barricades have been built
and torn down repeatedly in the past.
Gagne has questions about the controls on the total project by approving
the first phase only. The Council will be approving a complete overall
plan but platting in phases, this would allow the control needed.
Questions on the need to obtain Watershed District approval of a grad-
ing and erosion plan. Engineer Norton did not feel that this would be
necessary for the first phase but may be for the completion phases. He
felt that the Comprehensive Storm Sewer plan has already addressed this
area and will have to be followed.
MINUTES
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING
MON., NOV. 19, 1984
page four
Preliminary Flat - Harding Acres, continued:
SIMPLE SUBDIVISION RESOLUTION NO. 85 -84
SUSAN REID - 23585 YELLOWSTONE TRAIL
Ms. Reid was present to request a division of approximately 39,000
square feet of the back portion of her lot to then be combined with
the property to the east.
Stover moved, seconded by Gagne to approve the division subject to the
legal combination with the property to the east, and a 10 foot drainage
and utility easement along each lot line be provided. Division was
approved by roll call vote - 5 ayes.
EXCELSIOR COVENANT CHURCH - SIGN REQUEST
Mr. Julien made a request for the church for a temporary sign from
11/20/84 to 12/20/84.
Gagne moved, seconded by Shaw to approve the sign request. Motion
carried - 5 ayes.
PARK COMMISSION REPORT
Gordy from the Park Commission indicated that some interest
has been expressed by the Tonka Soccer Association in building a
soccer field at Freeman Park.
The Commission has been looking at various parks in the City in an
effort to determine what should be planned in the future. Shady Hills
"Park property" at this time is no more than a run -off area, they discus-
sed various ways to deal with this area. Council suggested that the
Commission take a look at the prgpsed Waterford area park because of
the low elevation of this area. Tonka Bay has offered to take over
complete control of the now shared Crescent Beach and bill Shorewood
for 2 the expense, as Shorewood has done in the past. Rascop would
like Vogt and Tonka Bay Administrator to discuss this proposal.
HEILAND AUTOMOTIVE SIGN REQUEST
Rascop moved, seconded by Haugen to approve a request for a non - flashing
temporary sign to be placed at Heiland Automotive for the purpose of
a "Grand Opening" not to exceed 7 days.
Motion carried unanimously - 5 ayes.
MINUTES
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING
MON., FEBRUARY 25, i-985
Page three
1985 Dock Licenses, continued:
DECEMBER FINANCIAL STATEMENT REVIEW
Finance Director Beck reviewed the December Statement and tentative
year-end total, final 1984 Budget audit has not been completed.
HARDING ACRES - FINAL PLAT APPROVAL
RESOLUTION NO. 12-85
Engineer Norton has reviewed grading, drainage and utility plans sub-
mitted by TKDA Engineers for the development of Harding Acres. Gagne
expressed concerns that no added drainage be allowed to flow into the
Glen Road area drainage problem. Engineer Norton explained the plans
for the flow to go to the area to the northwest behind the current
Wild Duck 2nd addition. The developer will be responsible to install
ponding areas and a complete drainage system prior to turning the
responsibility of maintenance over to the City.
A request from the developer to be allowed to hookup 2 lots that face
Smithtown Road at the manhole instead of the line was recommended by
Engineer Norton. The line is approximately 23 feet deep and would
cause large cuts in Smithtown Road in order to install.
Haugen moved, seconded by Stover to approve the preliminary plat
according to the seven (7) recommendations set by Planner Nielsen
and in accordance with Engineer's letter dated February 19, 1985
(Planner Recommendations and Engineer's letter dated 2/19/85 attached
herein). Motion carried by Roll Call Vote - 5 ayes.
SEWER AND WATER BUDGET REVIEW
Finance Director Beck reviewed for the Council the Sewer and Water
Budget, going over the revenues and expenditures.
Gagne moved, seconded by Stover to adopt the Sewer and Water Budget
as submitted. Motion carried - 5 ayes.
E3
City of Shorewood
C ountr y t Road
Sh orewood, MN 55331
Attn: Mr. Dan Vogt Administrator
Re: Final Plat of Harding Acres
Dear Dan:
We received the grading, drainage and utility plans for the final plat of Hard-
ing Acres from TKDA, the developer's engineer. However, we did not receive a
copy of the final plat. Our review of the information received will address
the following items
1. Grading
2. Drainage
a. Storm Sewer
3. Utilities
a. Sanitary Sewer
b. Water
4. Streets
1. GRADING
the grading plan shows the revised contours. Most of the revisions occur in
Block 4, Lots 6 - 10. As shown on the grading plan the cross -lot drainage on
those lots is significant. This condition is critical in providing proper
drainage from south to north. When the building permits come in for these lots
provisions for this continuous drainage must be insured. Items such as retain-
ing walls or earthen berms should not be allowed unless they provide for this
cross -lot drainage.
Due to the grading required for the storm water storage pond, the building
envelope for Lot 5 is quite small. At the same time the storm water storage
pond should be somewhat larger to insure that runoff after development does not
exceed runoff prior to development. .,Additional storage capability should be
provided somehow. The Minnehaha Creek Watershed District should also address
this item. As of this writing we have not received anything from them.
/1 /". s It .. •. A. n •e nnA •A• �•. ♦w• � /w� �. I•.In ln..s�n •+/.I� ..
s •
�
Page Two
Mr. Da Vog Administ
February 1, 1985 0
The drainage has been properly addressed on Harding Lane as shown on the STORM
SEWER AND STREET Sheet, Sheet No. 2 of 2, with the exception of the storage
pond size as noted previously. Further discussion regarding the pond size is
required when we hear from the M.C.W.D.
One additional item is required on the discharge end of the 24" R.C.P., a surge
basin to prevent erosion from occurring. This can be installed in lieu of the
flared end section as shown on the drawings.
The drainage on Wedgewood will be disturbed during the installation of the
sanitary sewer. This must be restored after construction as well as handled
during construction with the appropriate erosion control measures.
3. UTILITIES
a. Sanitary Sewer: As mentioned previously, the existing sanitary sewer
w 11 a under the proposed ponding area. Minimum cover of 3.5' must be
maintained and the integrity of the pipe and manholes insured during
and after construction.
Connections to all existing sewer structures, whether pipes or man-
holes, shall be detailed on a special sheet contained in the specifi-
cations or shown on the plans. These detail sheets must be submitted
for review and approval prior to construction.
There is no sewer service shown for Lot 1, Block 3. It could be served
by Manhole 5 shown on Sheet No. 1 of 2, SANITARY SEWER.
The connection to existing Manhole 35 -21 must be 1 -2' above the bottom
with a finished grouted invert.
b. Water: There is -no water main shown or discussed. We assume the
developer will pursue this final plat with the intention of using indi-
vidual wells when the houses are built. If so, this must be addressed
on the building permit application.
COPY
HARDING ACRES SECOND
—'1 49 AVENUE
20 2
H ARD .99G k oz 41
dgrva+A CS
Jf
4
/ �.�° yv ` 0• °0 9 0 -,,,
954.9
94 9.8 qh�t�� S" ti ti yo _ 1 I m
/ o br a / l� !0 w
STo.� f `'e 0 0 °
r
h
''Top 19 5 7.1 b
U.Intr. = 949.1b �'
PROPOSED ELEVATIONS BENCHMARK,
— 614— tn.H, ,- Lei De -Sac
Top of Foundation ■y5$•5
Garage Floor . g58•I As swpWn•
Basement Floor 954 3 1 MIN. SETBACK REQ IREMENTS_
Approx. Sewer Service EI$v.. Mider V•••: a
Proposed Elevation$ t C Front - 3S "Ou Side ^ - r rn
Emoting Elevations r Z
Drainage Oireetlane . .. a Rear - +O BarDgepide -rO 0
Denotes Offset Stoke , O SCALE: t Inch 2 30 Feet OD
I hereby certify that this survey, pion or report was prepared by me JOB NO.:
/�IEDLUND or under my direct suDSrvislon rend Ihot f am a duly 114910414d � —*. 1� _ Z ,
Land Surveyor under the low$ of the Slots of Minnesels. lOOK: � otat• '
Planning Engineerlitg Surw)4t?g I3la 2
1"w�010 re. srss g t i0 tgJ9 Q' t IADD fiI.E� cHCCr.rn:
001$:
Rev : 8 i 24 / 89 J t r . LWdor$n. License Na113rs M i �L Z8
Rev•• �6 89-Sea evel
Brad Nielsen
t
City of rr,: od
5755 Country Club Road
Shorewood,
Ile: Lot 5, Flock I Harding Acres Second Addition
OSM Comm. No. 1744.02
Dear Mr. Nielsen:
As requested by Mr. Joe Pazendak, we have investigated the construction of the home on
the referenced lot. Mr. Pazendak's concern was that the grading for the new home had
substantially filled in the existing drainage pond. Our field inspection did indeed reveal that
the pond had been filled in, with a slope being built from the bottom of the old pond to a
point about three or four feet out from the rear of the new home.
We subsequently researched our file and found a letter dated February 19, 1985 from this
office regarding the final plat of Harding Acres. In this letter it was noted that the building
envelope for Lot 5 was quite small and that additional stormwater storage for the pond was
needed.
On September 26, 1988 we received a permit from the Minnehaha Creek Watershed
District. This permit was in part based upon a drainage and grading plan prepared by
'I'KDA, Inc. dated February 8, 1985, which included the rough dimensions for the pond in
question. This pond is indeed notably larger than what is existing after the new home
construction on Lot 5, apparently confirming that the construction of this home did fill in
part of that pond. Unfortunately, the complete computations for the sizing of this pond
were not included in our copy of the permit applications and, therefore, we can make no
determination as to whether or not the pond as changed is adequate or inadequate.
It is our recommendation that, prior to a certificate of occupancy for this home, further
investigation be done by the owner of the house to determine what (if anything) needs to
be done to increase the ponding size. One option would include building a retaining wall
behind the home at the storm sewer drainage easement. This would only leave about a five
foot flat spot from the house to the top of the retaining wall, but would increase the size of
the pond substantially. Another option would be to investigate the possibility of increasing
the pond size around to the northeast portion of the lot. Whether or not either of these
Mr. Brad Nielsen.
March 1, 1991
Page
Joel Dresel, P.E.
Project Engineer
/cmw
03 /91- cos.bn
c: Mr. Elmer Aagard, CMIC
Mr. Joe Pazendak,
Mr. Jim Norton, OSM
Date Issued 4/12/91 Building Official
FOR YOUR INFORMATION
In purchasing a new home, file for your homestead. Register your address fo►
voting, driver's license and automobile registration. Water and sewer bills are sent out
every three months.
A permit is required to build a garage, accessory building, additions or alterations
to your house.
Please secure and affix your new house number while this reminder is fresh
in your mind.
01
OAS yeron t
Assodates, Inc.
Lyman Mr. Elmer Aagard
# '"
300 Morse Avenue
Excelsior, MN 55331
Re: Proposed fond Excavation
Lot S, Block 1, Harding Acres Second Addition
OSM Co mm. No. 4590.xx
.Dear Mr. Aagard:
2021 East Hennepin Avenge
Minneapolis, MN 554!3
612- 331 -8660
FAX 331 -3806 Engineers
Surveyors
Planners
We have reviewed the information submitted on your behalf from Otto Associates Engineers
and Land Surveyors regarding the above pond excavation. While we are not in complete
agreement on the calculation summary sheet provided, we have reviewed the raw data
supplied and agree that the proposed excavation as shown on the plans will bring the pond
volumes back into agreement with what was originally planned by TKDA. Therefore, we
recommend construction of the proposed pond as shown on the plans by Otto Associates,
dated April 29, 1991.
Please contact me when you are under construction, as we would like to observe portions
of the construction and would like to do a final construction observation.
Please call if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
ORR- SCHELEN- MAYERON
& ASSOCIATES, INC.
i oel Dresel, P.E., L.S.
City Engineer
/cmw
05 /91 -ea
c: Jim Hurm, City Administrator, City of Shorewood
Joe Pazendak, City Building Inspector, City of Shorewood
Equal Opportunity Employer
CITY C L REGULAR MEETING MINUTES
September 2, 2002
Page 7 of
commented power boats were not being discriminated against in this case, as the marina was allowed to
have four of them.
Liz e moved, Turgeon seconded., denial of the 2002 license for the Shorewood Yacht Club. Motion
passed 510.
Mayor Love thanked her for her efforts to represent all communities in this celebration and questioned
what Shorewood's role would be in the celebration other than financial support. Councilmember
Garfunkel questioned the amount of monies contributed by other South Lake Minnetonka communities.
Ms. Murrell explained that information was uncertain at this point in time as all communities and
businesses had not yet been contacted.
10 Mayor Love stated he was concerned that without substantive involvement of all communities, the
celebration could not be labeled a community event. He stated he was greatly aware of the history of the
founding of the communities, and would be more receptive to hearing how Shorewood could be more
involved. Also, Council invited Ms. Murrell to return at a later date to revisit this matter once additional
funding resources were established.
8. ENGINEERING/PUBLIC WORKS
A. Accepting a petition for Harding Lane and Ordering Preparation of Feasibility
Report
Engineer Brown explained residents from the Harding Lane and Glen Road area were requesting a
drainage improvement be performed to address the runoff entering the rear yards and homes from the
upland area of the Country Club Meadows development. He went on to explain the Harding Lane area
had been an area of issue for many years. In review of the plat for Harding Acres Second Addition, it was
discovered there was a drainage easement ranging 40 to 50 feet wide platted across the rear of the
property to provide for drainage of the upland areas recently developed. From a technical standpoint, this
approach would be acceptable. From a homeowner's perspective, the drainage was a nuisance.
Petitioners had stated the new Country Club Meadows subdivision had aggravated this situation. While
dramatic steps were taken to force as much of the drainage from Country Club Meadows to Fairway
Drive, ultimately drainage flowed to Smithtown Road in order to minimize impacts to the Harding Lane
and Glen Road areas.
Engineer Brown then shared the associated costs for proposed services from the City's consultant. He
noted the cost could change depending on the scope of services chosen to address the situation.
Engineer Brown also noted the presence of a number of residents affected by this drainage issue.
Councilmember Zerby questioned whether residents were aware of the potential assessments attributed to
finding solutions to this issue.
Carrie Nicklow, 5585 Harding Lane, stated she was not aware of the larger trunk project being discussed
as part of a long -term solution. However, she was interested in pursuing the installation of drain tile by
the developer of Country Club Meadows.
Councilmember Turgeon stated she believed there were two issues being discussed this evening. One
issue involved the actions of the developer for the Country Club Meadows development, and the other
issue involved finding a broader solution through examination of overall water storage /drainage issues for
the City.
Mayor Love agreed, noting this matter would require a short-term shift of water drainage and examination
of the overall drainage areas for the long -term.
Mike Delbusso, 25165 Glen Road, stated he had never had water in his backyard until this development
had been under construction. He stated he did not believe he should have to pay for long -term solutions
for this issue, as his problems were attributable to the grading of the development site.
Mayor Love stated all parties in the affected area needed relief, and he wanted to explore alternatives to
examine long -term needs and solutions for the area.
Engineer Brown stated he believed it was the consensus of the Council to continue pursuit of the
installation of drain tile as a short-term solution, and also contact the City's consulting firm to begin a
broader long -term examination to begin to layout alternatives.
Ms. Nicklow commented the water problems in the area had not been experienced prior to this year.
Engineer Brown stated the drainage easement in Harding Acres was there for a reason. He also asked
• residents for their cooperation in allowing the line to be placed on their property later this week to begin
to remedy the situation.
4.2 Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Improvements (Figures
External scaling protection systems (nfi- Shields) are proposed to be constructed on all samitary
manhole structures. The seals will be installed when the street is upgraded. The Inf-Shield is
placed on the outside of the adjusting rings on the sanitary sewer manhole s ct es to prevent
rainwater from infiltrating into the sanitary sewer system.
M O
rd
extensions Figures 3 and 4 identify the proposed possible water main improvements. The water main
t t` constructing P water line from the existing 8-inch
watermain that was extended into Hardin Avenue as fs
%art of the
project. • ► t receive , 1 -inch copper water service.
Watermain constructed as part of this project, would allow water service to Glen Road in the
future. If the City Council is inclined to move forward with watermain construction as part of
this project, a watermain stub will be provided near the north end of Harding Lane to
accommodate a possible future connection to Glen Road.
4.3 Storm Sewer Improvements
Figures 3 and 4 identifies the proposed storm sewer improvements. The proposed improvements
are intended to improve stormwater collection and conveyance. The stormwater basin at the
north end Harding Lane will be graded to match that of the original grading plan as sediments
appear to have been deposited in the basin. The outlet control for the basin is also in need of
replacement.
WSB proposes no change in net impervious surface for this project; therefore, MCWD's Rule G
will not apply. Rule B will apply due to the project size; however, there are known drainage
problems downstream that my come up as part of the discussion of this project. The existing
pond was constructed when this road was originally built (1985), and has not been maintained to-
date. Rule D (Wetland Protection) will apply if there are impacts to the wetland area. However,
in our opinion, the City maybe eligible for a No -loss determination under the Wetland
Conservation Act, and may fall under the jurisdiction of the Clean Water Act- Section 404
(administered by Army Corps of Engineer's) depending on the scope of the proposed work.
It should also be noted that the downstream "ditch" has been filled in to the point that its capacity
is limited. Rule N (Waterbody Crossings and Structures) may apply if the City proposes any
work within the beds and bank of the existing drainage way to restore ditch capacity or
functions. We recommend that the City of Shorewood monitor the downstream drainage
problem after the proposed project is constructed to determine if the outlet structure and pond
maintenance improves the downstream problem.
Feasibility Report
Harding Avenue and Harding Lane
Roadway Reconstruction and Watermain Improvements
City of Shorewood Project No. 09 -02
WSB Project No. 1459 -34
Page 6
C
P
O
Nov L
L
= X
W
V
O
y� U
FIT
Il
Prepared by St reet and Utility Reconstructi WSB Project No. 1459 -34
Date: May 25, 2009
- 701 Xenia Avenue South, Suite 300 Harding Lane and Harding Avenue
W[.Q Minneapolis, wsbe55416 Roadway Reconstruction & Watermain g
JJQQ ,„�„� y Fi Number
Improvements for the City of
— ��+ +�•F��� +� +� CITY OF 4
INFRASTRUCTURES ENGINEERING PLANNING CONSTRUCTION Sh Minnesota SHOREWOOD 1 11
�w
/77 —ZT,
SHOREWOOD
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD - SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927 - (952) 474-3236
• r od . - ..
The City of Shorewood has contracted with Northwest Asphalt, Inc. to rehabilitate Harding Lane
and Harding Avenue. Part of the rehabilitation project is storm sewer maintenance. During the
project the dry pond portion of the storm sewer which is located north of your home will be
cleaned out or excavated to depths similar to plat documents from 1985.
Northwest Asphalt, Inc. will access the pond from the Regional Rail Trail by permit. An access
trail will be constructed through the brush and trees. Trees and brush will be removed but we will
attempt to maximize the removal of dead trees. Erosion control silt fence will be installed. The
pond will be excavated and soils removed. A new pond inlet structure and a new outlet control
structure will be installed. The Regional Rail Trail will be restored with rock. The access trail
and edges of the pond will be seeded and covered. The silt fence will be removed when the grass
is growing.
Road project information will be posted on the city website, www.ci.shorewood.mn.us as it is
available. Go to Streets and Utilities on the left hand column and then click on Road Projects in
the right hand column.
If you have any questions, please call City Hall at (952) 960 -7910 or email
jlandiniQci.shorewood.mn.us .
a
to PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
PROJEC' m
2: G0RR /MTGS
—PAY REG
WNSULTPR0P,Itjv0ICE --
CCNSTR
LEGAL/EASE
ASSMNT
P S
PERMITS
— B[D /DOCS
FEES /COST
CITY OF
SHOREWOOD
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD - SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927 - (952) 474-3236
• r od . - ..
The City of Shorewood has contracted with Northwest Asphalt, Inc. to rehabilitate Harding Lane
and Harding Avenue. Part of the rehabilitation project is storm sewer maintenance. During the
project the dry pond portion of the storm sewer which is located north of your home will be
cleaned out or excavated to depths similar to plat documents from 1985.
Northwest Asphalt, Inc. will access the pond from the Regional Rail Trail by permit. An access
trail will be constructed through the brush and trees. Trees and brush will be removed but we will
attempt to maximize the removal of dead trees. Erosion control silt fence will be installed. The
pond will be excavated and soils removed. A new pond inlet structure and a new outlet control
structure will be installed. The Regional Rail Trail will be restored with rock. The access trail
and edges of the pond will be seeded and covered. The silt fence will be removed when the grass
is growing.
Road project information will be posted on the city website, www.ci.shorewood.mn.us as it is
available. Go to Streets and Utilities on the left hand column and then click on Road Projects in
the right hand column.
If you have any questions, please call City Hall at (952) 960 -7910 or email
jlandiniQci.shorewood.mn.us .
a
to PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
qq
HARDING ACRES
.11
P
ov
A
2 932i
rz. ski I
F K
Exhibit B
FINAL PLAT
COUNCIL ACTION FORM
MMEEM
Council Meeting
Date: May 20, 2010
On April 12, 2010, the City Council authorized publication of the Request for Proposals (RFP) for the SCADA controls and
Electrical Control Panels for • r 17 on '• and Shady Islands. As ■ published
and distributed to various vendors.
The deadline for submitting proposals occurred on May 12, 2010. Two proposals were received for the project.
As may have been mentioned previously, there are essentially three main vendors in the market place that specialize in
SCADA systems of this nature. It was unexpected that only two proposals were received at the time of the deadline.
When staff queried the third vendor, it was discovered that they had inadvertently placed on their calendar that
proposals were due three days after the actual date.
Typically, the City has and would take the stance that the deadline stands. Since this is a design build proposal, the City
is not bound by the strict bidding requirements for the scenarios of bidding of construction projects.
After review of the two proposals received, it turns out that one of the proposals submitted does not and cannot meet
the full specifications with their equipment. As such, it left the City in a position of having one sole vendor. Staff
discussed this and felt that it would be better to have a true comparison for evaluation of the proposals.
As such, staff has returned to the third vendor and invited them to submit their proposal for consideration. Again, the
City is not held to the strict bidding requirements, as performed in a construction project, as this is a design —
performance proposal.
Therefore, staff will receive the remaining proposal and continue with the evaluation. At this point, none of the costs or
information that has been submitted has been made known. Staff will continue to keep the proposals, until such time as
they have been formally evaluated. In turn, Staff will present the results to the City Council for consideration on June
14, 2010.
Staff Recommendation
No formal action is required by the City Council on this item.
Council Action:
00UNU111 ACIION FORM
Description/Background/Previous Action
The council discussed this item at their May 10 Council meeting and voted to refer it to the May 24
meeting and to invite Mr. Dick Osgood and residents of Enchanted Island to discuss and answer
questions related to the treatment.
The Council posed a few questions regarding the management of the financial contributions used for the
treatment.
Mr. Osgood provided information related to the history of the program and a breakdown of the finances
for the treatment of Phelps bay and this isattached.
Options
1. Approve the claim and authorize reimbursement to the LIVIA as budgeted in the amount of
$6,0X}0.
2. Approve reimbursement ofan amount less than the budgeted S6,OOU.
3. Do not authorize reimbursement.
Recommendation
Staff recommends the Council approve and authorize reimbursement for the treatment costs of Phelps
Bay ao provided for in the 2010budget.
Council Action:
Phelps Bay Milfbil Treatments — Account Status & Management
The Lake Minnetonka Association, along with our partners, is pleased to report the continued success of
the Phelps Bay treatment program. The program, initiated mi 2008, has completed the third annual
treatment for Eurasian watermilfoil control, curlyleaf pondweed control and native plant protection.
The Shorewood City Council has asked for clarifications regarding how the Lake Minnetonka accounts for
and manages funds relative to the Phelps Bay portion of this project.
1. The Lake Minnetonka Associations receives funding from various public and private sources
(detailed below) for the milfoil treatment project.
All funds received and expenses paid are segregated in a separate checking account for this project
and within this account all funds received and expenses paid are further segregated by Bay. The
Phelps Bay accounting summary is listed below.
3. Expense categories for this project include application costs, permit fees and project management.
4. There could be additional treatment costs in 2010.
5. According to the policy of the Lake Minnetonka Association, any excess fund balances are carried
forward and applied to the following year.
6. Treatment costs were less then estimated (so far) due to a) the requirement the treatments be
completed early in the season and b) there was less milfoil and curlyleaf pondweed.
LADE MINNETONkA ASSOCIATION C P. O. Box 245 I'tcelsior, NL\ 77331 0 (972) 4 4419
Phelps Bay Milfoil Treatments ® Account Status & Management
4 r ,
Phelps Bay Accounting Summary &Status
2008 2009 2010
INCOME
DNR
$ 8,333
$11,973
$ 8,333 (reimbursement
requested)
LMCD
$10,000
$10,000
$ 7,070 (reimbursement
requested)
Mound
$12,000
$12,000
$10,000 (reimbursement
requested)
Minnetrista
$ 6,000
$ 3,000
$ 3,000
Shorewood
$ 6,000
$ 6,000
$ 6,000 (reimbursement
requested)
Private
$30,396
$16,280
$18,490
Carry -over
n a
$8,200
[$2,6971
$72,729
$67,453
$50,196
E - XPENSE
Treatment
$56,112
$61,000
$28,280 (to -date)
Permit
$ 0
$ 0
$ 750
Management
$8
$9
$ 4,348 (to -date)
$64,529
$70,150
$33,378
NET
$ 8,200
[$2,697]
$ 16,818
LAKE MINNETONKA ASSOCIATION R 0. Box 248. Excelsior, NI_` 55331 0 (952) 4`0 4449
(],0UNCIL ACTION FORM
Description/Background/Previous Action
The operations committee met on Thursday, May 7, 2010 to discuss the issue of compensation for
Community Rec. Resources(CRR).
The City agreed to a contract with CRR to operate the Community Center effective July 1, 2009. The
agreement is for three years and includes increases in compensation, both base and incentive, at certain
points in the contract life. CRR approached the committee in April requesting a review of the agreement
based on time spent beyond the contracted amount as well as concerns regarding incentive pay for
events not associated with rental income that take time to coordinate and organize.
The Committee reviewed the operations and performance of the Center to date and based on this
review, agreed to review the contract and payments. The committee discussed several options and
arrived ato recommendation for consideration.
The Committee is recommending increasing the base pay for the contract from $10,000 to $15,000 and
the incentive pay from 15% of rental fees to 20%. The committee further recommends to include
community events where rent is not collected in the incentive pay and to allow the assistant to work up
to 13 hours per week. The committee recommends July 1, 2010 as the effective date for the changes.
This moves the increase ahead of schedule bv six /6\months.
All other provisions of the agreement remain.
Options
I. Accept and approve the recommendations nf the Committee
2. Suggest alternatives tn the recommendation
l Refer back to the committee for additional consideration
4. Take noaction
Recommendation
Staff recommends the Council approve the changes to the agreement as recommended by the
Committee.
Council Action:
Summary MinVtes — Southshore Center Operations Committee
Thursday, May 6.201Q
BoUthshope Community ` CeMter
3:U0 p.m.
Present: CoUnci|nlenlber Woodruff, CQuO[j|nReDlbBrZerbv'KdSU Anderson Community Rec.
Resources, and Brian Heck City Administrator.
The Committee met tOdiscuss and review the operations at the Community Center and to review the
status of the agreement between the City and Community Rec. Resources.
Heck told the committee that he and Kristi met a couple of weeks back and discussed possible
options regarding the current contract situation and compensation. Heck reviewed the situation with
the committee — that is Kristi is working more than the contracted amount of time without realizing
any compensation and many ofthe extra hours relate 10 organizing the special community programs
e.g. prom and spring fashion show. Heck then presented draft amendments to the agreement. The
main components include increasing the base pay from 10,000 to 15,000, allowing assistant time to
increase, and adjusting the incentive pay to include community events without rental.
Heck stated January 1.2U1Uia the proposed effective date.
Councilmember Zerby stated the draft document needs a statement that all other terms and
conditions of the agreement remain unchanged. He also supported the inclusion of commission for
community type events where no actual rental is paid.
Councilmember Woodruff stated he was ok with providing commission payments for community
events, however wanted to have further discussion on the increase in the base rate. He said he
prefers increasing the incentive pay rather than the base compensation. He also had concerns about
the change effective January 1.2O1O.
After additional discussion, the committee consensus is to recommend moving the time line up on
the increase iD compensation from January 1.2O11to July 1.2O1O. This will increase the base
compensation from $1O.0O0tn$15'0O0 and the incentive pay from 1596to2O96 and will include
community pn}gra[nnn|Dg that does not naSu|[ in regular rental.
K[isti discussed a few other issues she iS facing with regard to interactions with the S88P and the
time it takes to manage requests and questions. She said the volunteers are fine greeting visitors,
but she spends significant time answering their questions and addressing their concerns. This takes
away from her time working with Center business.
After further discussion and comments, the Committee asked Heck to see if having city staff work
out of the Community Center a few days a week. The committee also asked Heck to organize a
meeting with K8[ Nevvnn8n 8G8P Pnaoidant, to d\auuoe the operations of the center and how things
are going.
Finally, the committee discussed the computer and connection issues and council member Zerby
said h9 would look 8t the set up and dn what he could to get itgoing.
There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at3:45p.m.
AMMEN[]MENTTO
SOUTHSH[)RE CENTER
MANAGEMENTAGREEMENT
WHEREAS, the City of Shorewood, herein after "City" and Community Rec. Resources, herein
after "Contractor", agreed to a three year contract for the management of the SouthehoneCommunky
Center; and
31111=11 I IN IN 1 1 111 111 1111 IMF I
WHEREAS, for the past 9 months of the agreement, the Contractor has exceeded the stated
number of hours in marketing and improving use of the Center; and
WHEREAS, the City has benefited from the Contractor's efforts in marketing the Center; and
WHEREAS, the success of the Center over the past 0 months isattributed to the work ofthe
Now Therefore, Be it Resolved, that the Agreement by and between the City and the Contractor
be amended oofollows:
1. Section 5, increase the base fee from the current $10,000 per year to $15,000 per year.
2. Section 5, subdivision ii, increase the amount of time for the part-time worker from the current 10
hours hm13hours.
3. Section 6, incentive pay to increase from 15%to20Y6.
4. Section 6, Incentive Pay will include community type events organized by the Contractor such as
the prom open house / Spring fashion show. The compensation shall be 20% of the rental rate
that would have been charged.
For example, a community wide program is held (prom show) onaSaturday from 4:00p.m. tc
1O:0Op.m. The regular rental fee would have been $472. thus CRR earns 15%of the $472or
$70.80 for the event.
5. The amendments outlined herein shall ba effective July 1.2O10
6. All other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain unchanged.
City ofShorewood CnmmunityRac Resources
COUNUIL ACTION FORM
Description/Background/Previous Action
The City Council discussed and approved amendments to the ordinance section governing the Planning
Commission. Following the adoption of these amendments, the Council then adopted amotion
directing staff to review and propose amendments to the ordinance section governing the Park
Commission so the two were more in line regarding appointment, removal, attendance, etc.
Staff completed the amendments and the Park Commission reviewed the document at their May 11
meeting. The Park Commission recommended the Council adopt the amendments as provided.
Options
1. Approve the recommendation of the park commission to approve the amendments as provided.
2. Review and suggest additional amendments.
3. Do nothing.
4. Send back to the staff and Park Commission for further review and changes.
Recommendation
Staff recommends the Council approve the recommendation of the Park Commission to adopt the
amendments to the Ordinance.
Council Action:
PARK. COMMISSION
Section
202.01 PURPOSE.
The city does now operate and maintain public parks for the benefit and pleasure of its citizens,
and the city has in the past expended monies for capital improvements and maintenance of these parks.
It is the desire of the city to establish a Park Commission for the city as an advisory body to the City
Council to aid that Council in the expenditure of monies so that the greatest benefit may be obtained
from the use and maintenance of the parks.
(1987 Code, ' 202.01) (Ord. 84, passed 6 -23 -1975)
202.02 COMMISSION CREATED, MEMBERSHIP, TERM OF OFFICE.
A Shorewood Park Commission is created which will serve as an advisory body to the City
Council.
Subd. 1. Membership in the Commission.
a. Membership shall consist of up to seven residents of the city appointed by the City
Council. Terms of all members shall be for three years, and the terms shall be staggered.
All appointments shall be made by resolution. Terms of appointment commence on
March I and terminate on the last day of February, or until the vacancy is filled.
b. Exception: those appointments made in January, 1999, shall be effective immediately
upon passage of the appointment resolution.
c. The City Council shall designate one of its members as its liaison to meet with the Park
Commission, and it shall direct the Park Commission to designate one member of its
body as a liaison person to meet with the Planning Commission_. tn4-- the -- Planing
�titn+ �- rii�n- sl- ��ll-- de�i�nz =cif- its- liod�� ��rn- 1iz�+�;�sn- tz>- ��reet -w +tip- thy- 1'�3rk
Commission.-
Subd. 2. Removals. The City Council shall have the power to remove any member of the Park
Commission.- �r- ��w�— a�- d�r�l -i +�- the— Sher�v: -oc�d- Per: tct�n�l- Pi}{'tc�� }El �a +1t��p�tl�l is
2006S-1 202 -1
(1987 Code, ' 202.02) (Ord. 84, passed 6 -23 -1975; Ord. 264, passed 1 -I1 -1993; Ord. 278, passed
8 -23 -1993; Ord. 3I7, passed 12 -4 -1996; Ord. 349, passed 1 -25 -1999; Am. Ord. 406, passed 9 -13 -2004)
Subd. 3 l(tten Dulyappoint nae mbe,i S of the Park Commission shall be requ ired to attend no
less _th n one Mali 6 the , tirl s a tear) of the uiigs_ui ell kcal% Failure ( Formatted: Indent: Le ft. 0.9"
....
_. ._. , g _.....
.attend the „regtiiSitf,ilumbet' mcetim�s Shall be considered.._iesi,;ndtttln from the Park
C orniliissioi "t.
Subd. 1. Officers. The Chair and Vice -Chair of the Park Commission shall be selected by the members
of the Commission, and those persons shall serve in their respective positions for a period
of one year. The Park Commission may appoint a Secretary from among its members.
Subd. 2. Meetings. The Park Commission shall meet at least monthly, and all meetings shall be open to
the public.
Subd. 3. Rules of order and business. The Park Commission shall adopt rules and regulations
governing the conduct of its meetings. A maiority of its membership shall be required to
conduct official business.
Subd. 4. :11iruTtes and recor(L . The Park Commission shall keet) minutes ofits oroceedings showing tits:
vote of each member uRoi question, or if absent or t ailing to vote indicating the
fact. and shall als kee) records of its hearings <md _ot her official actions Even%
ic.q,u rerrient or determination of'_ he Park Commission shall be filar with tile,
C itV_C C0111161 111d Shall be ti_pubhe record,._
(1987 Code, ' 202.03) (Ord. 84, passed 6 -23 -1975; Ord. 102, passed 8 -14 -1978; Ord. 317, passed
12 -4 -1996; Am. Ord. 407, passed 9 -27 -2004)
202.04 POWERS AND DUTIES.
The Commission is designated the following responsibilities:
Subd. 1. Consider, review, report and advise on all matters which the Council may refer to the
Commission;
Subd. 2. Plan, on a long -term basis, for the future park and recreational needs of the city and
recommend to the Council a feasible means of financing the long -term requirements;
Subd. 3. Recommend to the Council operating policies and procedures for use of existing parks;
Subd. 4. On or before July 15 of each year, develop and refer to the Council a recommended
operational and capital improvement budget for parks for the ensuing year;
Subd. 5. Submit to the Planning Commission comments on any proposed subdivisions, as the same
may or may not affect the city's park and playground requirements.
(1987 Code, ' 202.03) (Ord. 84, passed 6 -23 -1975)
201,05 AMEINDME NTS.
...7 l �l J � entire C`i,t��
1 his cflzr <
Chapter 46rtz(I h� <rrrr�rtcled r>r�11 it �«r� .i r�>���r( rxr�t �,rrt} s <>tc of the
2006S-1 202 -3
COUNCIL ACTION FORM
Department: Planning Council Meeting: 24 May 2010 Item Number 10D
From: Brad Nielsen, Planning Director
Item Description: Deer Management Program — 2010 Dates
|n March of this year, staff prepared a report nnthe outcome 0fthe annual aerial deer survey
conducted under the guidance Vf Three Rivers Park District. The report indicated that the deer
counts were up after e year's suspension of the management program. The report also
suggested some possible goals and objectives relative to deer management. The consensus of
the Council was to prepare a policy statement elaborating on the suggestions in the report.
Staff continues to work on that policy and will present ittnthe Council in the next 90 days.
Meanwhile, we have been in contact with Bob Whiting, President of the Metro Bowhunters
Resource Board to arrange dates for this year's program. The attached draft of the ZOl0Hunt
Rules suggests the following dates: 25-26 September; 9-lOOctober; 23-24 October; and l9-l4
November. The W1BRB has asked for approval of the dates so that they can schedule their
members and the training session required under the rules. A5of this writing vve have not
determined hunt sites, but the ones that will be proposed will be in the areas of deer
concentration, based on the aerial survey.
Approve the dates or select different ones.
Staff Recommendation
The dates chosen are intended 10 maximize the archers' success. They prefer to have o couple ofweeks
in between hunts. Staff recommends approval of the proposed dates and hunt rules.
Council Action:
City of Shorewood
N=
Special Archery Deer Hunt Rules
1, Deer hunt locations are limited to the areas as identified on the attached maps.
2. All hunters must attend the hunt orientation on September 23, 2010 at the Shorewood City
Hall. Directions will be provided with the invitation letter.
1 11111
Saturday /Sunday on the following dates: Sept 25-26, Oct 9-10, Oct 23-24, and Nov 1 )-14.
Tree stands can be erected on the preceding Fridays. No hunting on Fridays.
4. All hunters are selected through the Metro Bowhunters Resource Base (MBRB).
5. Hunters must follow all Minnesota DNR laws and all MBRB special rules.
6. All hunt periods are for either sex deer.
7. Hunters must carry a hunt authorization letter from the City at all times during hunt.
8. Hui areas are closed to the public for the purpose of safety during the hunt. All incidents of
trespass should be reported to the MBRB hunt coordinator who will contact the Shorewood
Police.
9. All archers must hunt from elevated stands. Only TMA approved stands/ steps are
acceptable. Use of any homemade stands/steps is prohibited for safety reasons.
10. Ground blinds may be used by disabled hunters only. In this case the MBRB hunt
coordinator will place the blind in a safe location.
11. Hunters must have a flashlight and a warning whistle within easy reach during entry, egress,
and while on stand. A cell phone is also recommended.
12. A five-point fall restraint harness is required to be used by hunters at all times while on stand.
13. Only buckthorn can be cut for shooting lanes.
14. Stands can only be up during the designated hunt periods and must be removed from the area
at the completion of each hunt by 1 hour after legal shooting time on the Sunday evenings of
each hunt period.
15. Archers must park in designated areas only.
11 Jill 11, Mill 11111111111111111111111 1111111
17. Only deer may be taken during special hunts.
18. Hunters must log in an out of the hunt areas each time they leave. The MBRB hunt
coordinator will provide a log in sheet at an appropriate location.
19. Archers cannot track deer outside of hunt boundaries. Hunters must contact the MBRB hunt
coordinator if deer retrieval is required outside of hunt boundaries. The hunt coordinator will
make arrangements for police escort, or obtain landowner permission before tracking deer
onto adjacent properties.
20. Additional restrictions may be added at the required orientation meeting.
21. Hunters should immediately report any incidents to the MBRB hunt coordinator.
22. Hunters are directed not to speak to any protestors or news media. These incidents are to be
reported to the MBRB hunt coordinator immediately. The MBRB hunt coordinator will
contact the appropriate City staff and /or the Police who will handle any communication
needed.
23. Shorewood Police Department should be contacted immediately in the case of accidents.
24. Failure to follow rules will lead to removal from hunt.
COUNCIL ACTION FORM
Earlier this evening, Council interviewed three candidates for consideration of appointment tothe
Shorewood Park Commission to fill the one open seat with a term through February 28, 2013. The
candidates are:
Anthony Lardi424700VWltsey Lane
Jerry Clayton of 5655 Fairway Drive
Nicholas Svvaggert,ZO145 Excelsior Blvd.
Options
1. Appoint one nf the above candidates to the Park Commission, by resolution.
2. Direct staff to continue to advertise for Park Commission candidates.
Council Action
Choose option 1orIabove.
Council Action:
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
RESOLUTION N 10-0
A RESOLUTION MAKING PARK COMMISSION APPOINTMENT
WHEREAS, the City of Shorewood has advertised for Shorewood residents to apply to
serve on the Park Commission;
WHEREAS, the City Council did complete the selection procedure for appointment to
said Commission, and at its May 24, 2010 meeting, made a motion to appoint the candidates as
indicated below.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of
Shorewood hereby makes the following appointment to the Park Commission effective May 24,
2010, with the term expiration as indicated:
Park Commission:
Member Term Expiring
1.
February 28, 2013
Said appointment is added to the current Park Commission which consists of the following
additional members:
Member Term Expiring
2.
Josh Trent
3.
Suzanne Gaidos
4.
Jeremy Norman
5.
Steve Quinlan
6.
Bob Edmondson
7.
Thomas Robb
February 28, 2013
February 28, 2013
February 28, 2011
February 28, 2011
February 29, 2012
February 29, 2012
ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD this 24
day of May, 2010.
Christine Liz6e, Mayor
ATTEST:
Brian Heck, City Administrator/Clerk
COUNCIL ACTION FORM
Department: Planning Council Meeting: 24 May ZOlO Item Number: �~~" ����
F[Dnn: Brad Nielsen, Planning Director
Item Description: Koehnen - Incidental Use of the Right-of-Way Permit
Carol Koehnen owns the properties at2GOZOand 2GU3OVa||eyvvwod Lane (see location map —
Exhibit A,attaChed). 2602O has e home on it, 26O3O does not. |n marketing the vacant lot, she
has been asked to confirm that itisa buildable lot. The two properties abut anundeveloped
segment ofVaUeyvvoodLane. The city street stops atVaUeyvvood Circle and an existing private
driveway serves Ms. Koehnen's lots and the lot 8t26O5OVaUeyvvoodLane, Asb sits today, the
common driveway that serves the two existing homes does not comply with current Fire Code
requirements relative to fire access. |n order to build on the vacant lot, Ms. Koehnenmust
widen the existing driveway that lies within the Valleyvvood Lane right-of-way (see Exhibit B).
The proposed work complies with Fire Code requirements but requires an encroachment
permit from the City to use o public right-of-way for a private purpose. Section 901.01 3ubd. I
provides for such cases, requiring that the applicant enter into an encroachment agreement
with the City. Staff has prepared a draft agreement for your review and consideration (see
Exhibit (,attached\.
Options
Approve the encroachment permit; deny the permit; or modify the permit.
Staff Recommendation
This request provides an opportunity to improve safety by upgrading fire access to the properties in
question. Staff recommends approving the permit, subject to the applicant entering into the
encroachment agreement and recording it against the subject properties
Council Action:
sand S£ MH
1 2 a 6 8 N 2: 1122 — Go � 0 s 9Z,-299 H LF 3
T
--
oq
O
0
<
0
0 S 0
0 , •o
O 8g /,S 19,
'9 0/ WV
W __j
6W
b.HN OS
22'si
18
99. ci'Z-961
09 po
26'9S[
ZT)
0 9 N
RN 0
os
__j
LLJ
os
LJ
7
5c U
Ln
,n
T
In 9b 921 t&21,11 .0N VO ILE
N
SSE 217Z
k Ln e
os
Ld
N LIZ
F 'j w o F)
ol
r �N �/ / S8 °'_ o� SSE
zs
cb 09=
0 L
p
Cn s
o �z 000
<
----------
T
F O m cn
os
51 S8Z 0171
Z lo 079 us2q. Z6'LV
H'01�2 002
l V891
ON 097
----------
cl
CC ------ - ----
<
fL —
IV
/
171 1
low,
(A3(]Nn) 1 0
.,
0 �n
g o
00 z
6 Exhibit A
69'W HIHON
p S2
E
�n
0
Cn 0
5'551
S °551
Ul
O
6
LX)
5 °551
5 °551
LJ
7
5c U
Ln
,n
T
In 9b 921 t&21,11 .0N VO ILE
N
SSE 217Z
k Ln e
os
Ld
N LIZ
F 'j w o F)
ol
r �N �/ / S8 °'_ o� SSE
zs
cb 09=
0 L
p
Cn s
o �z 000
<
----------
T
F O m cn
os
51 S8Z 0171
Z lo 079 us2q. Z6'LV
H'01�2 002
l V891
ON 097
----------
cl
CC ------ - ----
<
fL —
IV
/
171 1
low,
(A3(]Nn) 1 0
.,
0 �n
g o
00 z
6 Exhibit A
69'W HIHON
p S2
E
i
1 Cc
Imo' 1
-- •„.,.`\ i Imo' Its
\
Z
o
> I�'I
d_ Q C al F
UW h y
G'Q rhn ���tt W
Z O wW 1 u ���
'o K N o
Z2
0 U U ir
(N I I /
- <�
m
ugo,�
U
WI W�
W,o OE w®
o z o m U a o
CD (D° Zo ZW
Zzp az win (w
�° mw I
wwm o0 00
cfo_ i
�� Fe <N
ONO
1
I �I
Cvl i i i
0
if
w
I
Z a
a
W / a % y ¢ b � ''_� i 41,
0
"---------------- - - - - --
ovoa ianvaq M ,Z6,MX0 N
a --- - - - - --
00'OL 00'0£3
¢w
N W
_--- -- —
�� ._. --
m �
s _, - - - -- °es, _ —
F V' p
a Z
co LU
Nw0 Z � O �
w J J w
OQK 0
Exhibit B
ENCROACHMENT AGREEMENT
This Agreement, is entered into this — day of May, 2010, by and between Carol
Koehnen, and the City of Shorewood, a Minnesota municipal corporation.
RECITALS
WHEREAS, the City of Shorewood (the "City") is a Minnesota municipal corporation
operating as a statutory city under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and
WHEREAS, Carol Koehnen (the "Property Owner") owns certain real estate located at
26020 Valleywood Lane and 26030 Valleywood Lane within the City and described in the
attached Exhibit A (the "Properties"); and
WHEREAS, the Properties abut and share a common property line with Valleywood
Lane, a platted but undeveloped portion of street within the City (the "Right-of-Way"); and
WHEREAS, the Property Owner proposes to expand an existing private driveway within
the Right-of-Way along the common property line of the Property and the Right-of-Way (the
"Improvement"); and
WHEREAS, the Property Owner and City have agreed to the installation of the
Improvement in the location depicted on the plans on file with the City dated 30 March 2010.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the City consents to allow the contractors and
agents of the Property Owner to enter upon the Right-of-Way to construct the Improvement in
the location and as depicted in the plans on file with the City to be approved by the City Engineer
and further the Property Owner agrees to provide that financial surety as required by the City
Engineer; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Property Owner does
hereby indemnify and waive the City, by and through its City Council, officials and employees,
from any and all claims arising from the use of the Right-of-Way and construction of the
Improvement, together with those claims of the users of the Right-of-Way through the customary
and incidental use of the Right-of-Way.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, in the event the city at any time
requires the use or alteration of the Improvement within the Right-of-Way, the Property Owner
agrees to make no claim for damages to the City.
Exhibit C
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
By: By:
Christine Lizee
Its: Mayor
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
Brian. Heck
Its: City Administrator /Clerk
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on 24 May, 2010, by Christine
Lizee and Brian Heck, the Mayor and City Administrator /Clerk, respectively, of the City of
Shorewood, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation.
Notary Public
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on May 2010, by Carol
Koehiien, Property owner.
Notary Public
THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY:
Larkin Hoffman Daly & Lindgren Ltd.
1500 Wells Fargo Plaza
7900 Xerxes Avenue South
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55431 -1194
(952) 835 -3800 (TJK)
EDITED BY:
Shorewood Planning Department
919505.1
0
1,.
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
PRELIMINARY FINANCIAL REPORT FOR THE PERIOD ENDED APRIL 30, 2010
This report provides preliminary financial information for the period April 2010. Approximately 33.33%
of the year is completed.
2010 Budget 2010 YTD Actual % of Budget
Revenues $ 5,375,404 $ 148,420 2.76%
Expenditures $5,375,404 $ 1,480,885 27.55%
Net Revenues Over/(Under)
Expenditures $ 0 ( 1,332,465)
GENERAL FUND REVENUES
General Fund year -to -date revenues of $148,420 are slightly lagging the same period last year. Building
permit revenues continue to trend upward slightly over this period last year; fine revenue and
miscellaneous revenue still lag from projections.
GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES
General Fund expenditures are less than. expected at 27.55% of budget; when compared to one -third
(33.33 %) of the year completed. In addition, total General Fund year -to -date expenditures are at $1.332
million, which is less than $1.374 million at this same time last year.
Professional Services expenditures are slightly higher than expected, due to payment of 50% of the
County Assessor's annual fee ($47,000). Snow and Ice expenditures are at 65% of budget; the
remainder will likely be used at year end. The Fire department is paid through June (end of 2nd quarter,
as is the Police building payment. The other departments appear to be on target, with expenditures less
than expected.
ENTERPRISE FUNDS
The results for the enterprise operating funds indicate tracking on target. Year —to -date capital
improvement activity has been minimal, thus expenditures in these funds are generally less than
expected. The Water fund has paid some semi - annual debt service payments. The Southshore Center
revenues and expenditures are slightly higher than anticipated; however expenditures continue to out-
pace revenues slightly.
Please contact me if you have any questions about April 2010 data.
11.A.1
MONTHLY BUDGET REPORT - GENERAL FUND Y -T -D OVERVIEW
APRIL 2010 - 33.33% of Year Completed
2008
2008
2009
2009
2010
2010
2010
2010 Actual
Variance
Y -T -D
Annual
Y -T -D
Annual
Y -T -D
Y -T -D
Adopted
as a %
Actual vs.
Actual
Actual
Actual
Projected
Actual
Projected
Budget
of budget
Projected
Comments _I
REVENUE
I
Property Taxes
$
-
$ 4,582,601
$
-
$ 4,708,810
$
-
$ -
$ 4,776,292
0.00%
-
2010 tax settlements received June and December
Licenses and Permits
88,623
195,420
51,232
128,651
44,269
35,423
106,270
41.66%
8,845
Building permit revenue slightly exceeds projections
Intergovernmental
29,060
78,155
30,736
66,411
32,324
32,500
65,000
49.73 %
(177)
50% Street Maintenance Revenue received
Charges for Service
32,334
50,754
21,105
41,732
29,118
15,333
46,000
63.30%
13,785
Fines and Forfeitures
14,935
53,369
19,678
55,863
15,551
18,333
55,000
28.27%
(2,782)
Fine revenue lags projections
Miscellaneous
21,644
176,535
45,272
121,224
27,158
42,667
128,000
21.22%
(15,508)
Interest income is much less than estimated
Transfers from other funds
-
40,000
-
200,000
-
-
198,842
0.00%
-
TOTAL
$ 186,595
$ 5,178,833
$ 168,023
$ 5,322,69
$ 148,420 $ 144,257 $ 5,375,404
2.76 ° /
4,164
EXPENDITURES
Department
Council
Personnel
5,060
16,255
5,663
16,794
5,598
5,598
16,794
33.33%
(0)
Materials and Supplies
982
2,478
2,020
3,064
419
400
1,200
34.95°/
19
Support and Services
10,972 1
50,988
10,869 1
46,157
11,648
15,400
46,200
25.21%
3,753
Total
$ 17,013
$ 69,721
$ 18,553
$ 66,015
$ 17,665 $ 21,398 $ 64,194
27.52%
3,733
Administration
Personnel
87,102
227,601
46,296
150,286
47,434
49,237
147,712
32.11%
(1,803)
Materials and Supplies
-
81
40
40
-
-
-
-
Support andServices
259
1,610
1,439
7,909
694
1,383
4,150
16.72%
(689)
Capital Outla
-
-
1,631
1,650
2,500
65.25%
19
Total
$ 87,361
$ 229,292
$ 47,774
$ 158,235
$ 49,759 $ 52,271 $ 154,362
32.24°/
2,511
General Government
Personnel
61,645
177,187
68,935
219,755
66,303
60,546
181,639
36.50%
5,757
Materials and Supplies
6,449
20,049
6,212
17,862
3,878
6,658
19,975
19.42%
(2,780)
Support and Services
7,617
28,733
7,803
31,506
7,833
10,768
32,305
24.25%
(2,936)
Capital Outla
480
-
3,679
6,540
1,213
1,200
2,500
48.54%
13
Total
$ 76,191
$ 225,969
$ 86,629
$ 275,663
$ 79,228 $ 79,173 $ 236,419
33.51%
55
Elections
Personnel
161
37,678
610
840
1,358
10,230
30,689
4.42%
Materials and Supplies
1,620
5,120
807
2,023
1,665
1,650
4,950
33.64%
15
Annual equipment maintenance fees
Support and Services
-
4,734
25
25
16
900
2,700
0.59%
(884)
Capital Outlay
-
-
600
0.00%
-
Total
1 $ 1,781
$ 47,532
$ 1
$ 2,888
$ 3,039 $ 12,780 $ 38,939
7.80%
9,741
Finance
Personnel
54,287
154,684
53,988
166,032
54,535
59,528
178,584
30.54%
(4,989)
Materials and Supplies
5,156
5,914
6,606
6,953
6,745
2,567
7,700
87.60%
4,178
Annual supply items
Support and Services
1,572
4,053
831
4,804
1,312
2,500
7,500
17.49%
(1,188)
Capital Outla
-
2,865
2,483
-
Includes 1/2 year Assessor ($47,000) per contract
Total
$ 61,015
164,651
$ 64,291
$ 180,272
$ 62,596 $ 64,595 $ _ 193,784
32.30%
1,999
Professional Services
$ 97,995
r$� 213,220
$ 101,075
$ 220,604
$ 74,869 66,333 $ 199,000
37.62 %
8,536
MONTHLY BUDGET REPORT - GENERAL FUND Y -T -D OVERVIEW
APRIL 2010 - 33.33% of Year Completed
2008
2008
2009
2009
2010
2010
2010
2010 Actual
Variance
Y -T -D
Annual
Y -T -D
Annual
Y -T•D
Y -T -D
Adopted
as a %
Actual vs.
Actual I
Actual
Actual
Projected
Actual
Projected
Budget
of budget
Projected
Comments
Planning and Zoning
Personnel
64,177
192,979
61,574
195,475
57,477
64,535
193,605
29.69%
(7,058)
Materials and Supplies
429
1,310
1,260
1,673
54
218
655
8.22%
(164)
Support and Services
2,814
9,986
1,626
8,989
4,462
1,567
4,700
94.93%
2,895
Capital Outlay
2,320
2,320
465
465
-
-
-
Total
$ 69,741
$ 206,595
$ 64,925
$ 206,602
$ 61,992 $ 66,320 $ 198,960
31.16°/
4,328
Municipal Building - City Hall
Materials and Supplies
14,313
26,532
10,933
34,275
25,087
18,267
54,800
45.78%
6,821
Includes annual LaserFiche maint ($5,000)'computer,phone maim
Support and Services
8,921
124,840
15,714
128,376
5,543
11,000
_ 133,000
4.17%
(5,457)
Budget amt includes approx 100K for insurance paid late in year
Capital Outla
-
-
-
53,040
1,090
-
'126,000
0.87%
1,090
Total
$ 23,234
$ 151,372
$ 26,646
$ 215,691
$ 31,721 $ 29,267 $ 313,800
10.11 %
2,454
Police
Materials and Supplies
-
-
-
Support Services
297,236
895,059
313,871
943,328
318,979
316,667
950,000
33.58°/
2,313
Capital Public Safety Bldg)
122,002
244,004
116.470
232,940
114,034
114,000
230,000
49.58°/
34
Includes 2 Qtrs payments
Total
$ 419,238
$ 1,139,063
$ 430,341
$ 1,176,268
$ 433,013 $ 430,667 $ 1,180,000
36.70%
2,347
Fire
-
Support Services
159,705
319,411
161,590
323,180
155,162
155,000
315,858
49.12%
162
Includes 2 Qtrly pmts to EFD/ 1 Qtr Mound
Capital Public Safety Bldg)
151,762
303,524
138,635
277,270
136,314
137,000
279,624
48.75%
686
Includes 2 Qtrly pmts to EFD
Total
$ 311,467
$ 622,934
$ 300,225
$ 600,450
$ 291,477 $ 292,000 $ 595.482
48.95%
523
Inspections
Personnel
43,449
130,391
35,537
119,185
36,895
39,314
117,943
31.28%
(2,419)
Materials and Supplies
5
5
-
-
22
133
400
5.51%
(111)
Support and Services
2,482
7,388
1,790
4,281
1,384
2,267
6,800
20.36%
(882)
Capital Outla
1,437
-
-
-
Total
$ 45,936
$ 137,784
$ 37,327
$ 124,903
$ 38,301 $ 41,714 $ 125,143
30.61%
3,413
City Engineer
Personnel
37,759
124,018
51,118
114,548
29,928
31,625
94,875
31.54%
(1,697)
Materials and Supplies
432
688
185
667
33
142
425
7.74%
(109)
Support and Services
992
7,505
3,651
7,638
1,735
5,049
15,146
11.45%
(3,314)
Capital Outla
14,735
15,365
1,828
2,929
-
1,000
0.00%
Total
$ 53,918
$ 147,576
$ 56,783
$ 125,782
$ 31,696 $ 36,815 $ 111,446
28.44%
5,120
Public Works Service
Personnel
103,288
295,616
103,622
316,871
89,394
98,457
295,372
30.26%
(9,063)
Materials and Supplies
22,909
77,289
22,344
57,419
21,253
23,708
71,123
29.88%
(2,455)
Support and Services
17,640
40,700
13,439
40,022
14,624
14,230
42,690
34.26%
394
Capital Outla
-
-
-
5,986
-
3,800
0.00%
-
Total
$ 143,837
$ 413,605
$ 139,405
$ 420,298
$ 125,271 $ 136,395 $
30.33%
11,124
Streets and Roads
Personnel
29,908
100,157
20,865
69,846
29,088
31,869
95,607
30.42%
(2,781)
Materials and Supplies
11,597
82,993
5,040
52,723
9,250
28,333
85,000
10.88%
(19,083)
Support and Services
81
14,284
-
27,679
206
7,833
23,500
0.88%
(7,627)
Capital Outla
-
Total
$ 41,586
$ 197,434
$ 25,906
$ 150,248
$ 38,545 $ 68,036 T
18.88%
29,491
MONTHLY BUDGET REPORT - GENERAL FUND Y -T -D OVERVIEW
APRIL 2010 - 33.33% of Year Completed
2008
2008
2009
2009
2010
2010
2010
2010 Actual
Variance
Y -T -D
Annual
Y -T -D
Annual
Y -T -D
Y -T -D
Adopted
as a %
Actual vs.
Actual
Actual
Actual
Projected
Actual
Projected
Budget
of budget
Projected
Comment
Snow and Ice
Personnel
Materials and Supplies
22,305
9,969
33,875
34,731
15,833
24,271
35,995
33,285
26,827
12,594
22,063
15,039
40,857
45,117
65.66%
27.91%
4,764
(2,445)
Estimate approx 18% ( month each for Jan, Feb, Mar I
Support and Services
-
-
-
-
-
Capital Outlay
-
-
-
Total
1 $ 32,275
$ 68,606
$ 40,104
$ 69,280
$ 39,421 $ $ 85,974
45.85%
2,319
Traffic control / Street Lights
1
Personnel
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Materials and Supplies
Support and Services
2,236
14,813
2,873
43,664
-
10,469
3,412
43,915
-
9,943
2,000
15,016
6,000
45,049
0.00%
22.07%
(2,000)
(5,074)
Capital Outlay
-
-
-
Total
$ 17,049
$ 46,537
1 $ 10,469
$ 47,327
$ 9,943 $ 17,016 $� 51,049
19.48%
7,074
Sanitation/Waste/Weed Control
Personnel
Materials and Supplies
Support and Services
-
-
2,005
32
7,698
1,036
-
2,764
21
-
3,880
-
-
167
1,467
-
500
4,400
0.00%
0.00%
3,880
(167)
(1,467)
Capital Outla
Total
$ -
$ 9,736
$ 1
$ 2
$ 3,880 $ 1,633 $ _ 4,900
1 79.19%
2,247
Tree Maintenance
Personnel
4,571
19,042
1,536
7,512
1,822
5,760
17,279
10.55%
(3,937)
Materials and Supplies
Support and Services
-
693
333
4,975
40
1,021
438
9,325
-
4,977
900
4,500.
2,700
13,500
0.00%
36.87%
(900)
477
Capital Outla
Total
$ 5,264
$ 24,351
$ 2,598
$ 17,275
$ 6,799 $ 11,160 $ 33,479
20.31%
4,360
Parks and Recreation
Personnel
47,942
139,162
48,122
147,532
53,070
53,494
160,481
33.07%
(423)
Materials and Supplies
Support and Services
3,236
30,738
14,810
75,282
4,919
30,025
10,142
109,141
2,108
26,493
5,433
30,867
16,300
92,600
12.93%
28.61%
(3,325)
(4,374)
Capital Outlay
-
-
5,003
-
-
-
Total
$ 81,917
$ 229,255
$ 88,070
$ 266,815
$ 81,671 $ 89,794 $ 269,381
30.32%
(8,123
UnAllocated Expense
$ -
$ -
$ -
$
Total Expenditures
$ 1,586,817
$ 4,345,233
$ 1,543,598
$ 4,327,401
$ 1,480,885 $ 1,554,468 $ 4,473,404
33.10%
(73,583)
$
-
$
885,000
$
-
$ 980,000
$
-
$ -
$ 902,000
Transfers Out
$
1,586,817
$ 5,230,233
$
1,543,598
$ 5,307,401
$
1,480,885
$ 1,554,468
$ 5,375,404
27.55%
(73,583)
Total Expenditures & Tsfrs
Revs Over /(Under) Expen
$ (1,400,222)
$ (53
$ (1,375,575)
$ 15,291
$ (1 $ (1,410,211) $ -
MONTHLY BUDGET REPORT - WATER FUND Y -T -D OVERVIEW
APRIL 2010 - 33.33% of Year Completed
2008
2008
2009
2009
2010
2010
2010
2010 Actual
Variance
Y -T -D
Annual
Y -T -D
Annual
Y -T -D
Y -T -D
Adopted
as a %
Actual vs.
Actual
Actual
Actual
Actual
Actual
Projected
Budget
of budget
Projected
Com ments
REVENUE
Special Assessments
Misc Revenue
Utility Revenue
20,448
10,050
94,302
34,922
106,001
716,966
3,048
29,245
171,100
123,680
59,000
756,000
$
3,456
13,331
223,389
$
-
23,333
200,750
$ 80,000
70,000
803,000
4.32%
19.04%
27.82%
3,456
(10,002)
22,639
i
Interest income & connect charges less than expected
Transfers from other funds
-
-
-
TOTAL
$ 124,801
$ 857,889
$ 203,393
$ 938,680
$ 240,176 $ 224,083 $ 953,000
25.20%
16,093
EXPENDITURES
WATER
Personnel
Materials and Supplies
Support and Services
Capital Outlay
Debt Service
$
24,728
13,283
104,068
2,919
307,578
$ 95,734
53,039
346,548
215,045
392,588
$
30,884
11,041
116,481
13,977
252,086
$
91,251
53,567
339,425
96,680
428,948
$
25,109
12,869
111,581
-
251,614
$
29,264
23,117
120,967
-
252,000
$ 87,792
69,350
362,900
412,751
376,500
28.60%
18.56%
30.75%
0.00%
66.83%
(4,155)
(10,248)
(9,386)
-
(386)
January debt service payment
Transfers to Other Funds
-
-
-
-
TOTAL
$ 452,576
$ 1,102,954
$ 424,469
$ 1,009,871
$ 401,173 $ 425,347 $ 1,309,293
30.64%
(24,174)
Total Expenditures
$ 452,576
$ 1,102,954
$ 424,469
$ 1,009,871
$ 401,173 $ 425,347 $ 1,309,293
30.64%
(24,174)
-
-
-
-
-
Transfers Out
$
452,576
$ 1,102,954
$
424,469
$
1,009,871
$
401,173
$
425,3
$ 1,309,
30.64%
(24,174)
Total Expenditures & Transfers
Revs Over /(Under) Expen
$ (327,775)
$ (245,065)
$ (221,076)
$ (71,190)
$ (160,997) $ (201,264) $ (356,293)
MONTHLY BUDGET REPORT - SEWER FUND Y -T -D OVERVIEW
APRIL 2010 - 33.33% of Year Completed
2008
Y -T -D
Actual
2008
Annual
Actual
2009
Y -T -D
Actual
2009
Annual
Actual
2010
Y -T -D
Actual
2010
Y -T -D
Projected
2010
Adopted
Budget
2010 Actual
as a %
of budget
Variance
Actual vs.
Projected
Comments
REVENUE
Special Assessments
Misc Revenue
Utility Revenue
Transfers from other funds
15,257
138,509
139,194
829,117
60,000
-
33,634
178,846
-
72,390
806,651
60,000
14,873
209,542
-
28,200
206,325
-
84,600
825,300
60,000
17.58%
25.39%
0.00%
(13,327)
3,217
-
Interest income less than expected
TOTAL
$ 153,766 1
$ 1,028,311
$ 212,480
$ 939,041
$ 224,415 $ 234,525 $ 969,900
23.14%
(10,110)
EXPENDITURES
SEWER
Personnel
Materials and Supplies
Support and Services
Capital Outlay
Debt Service
Transfers to Other Funds
32,815
2,794
314,019
20,853
-
87,188
7,892
826,158
225,878
-
$
15,830
2,377
275,827
12,282
$ 69,217
6,089
844,136
12,555
$
20,461
2,071
326,167
-
$ 25,437
6,500
291,517
-
$ 76,311
19,500
874,550
420,523
26.81%
10.62%
37.30%
0.00%
0.00%
(4,976)
(4,429)
34,650
-
Actual YTD includes 5 months MCES chgs and contract secs
Community Infrastructure Fund
i
TOTAL
$ 370,481
$ 1,147,117
$ 306,316
$ 931,998
$ 348,698 $ 323,454 $ 1,390,884
25.07%
25,245
Total Expenditures
Transfers Out
Total Expenditures & Transfers
$ 370,481
$ 1,147,117
$ 306,316
$ 931,998
$ 348,698 $ 323,454 $ 1, 390,884
25.07%
25,245
-
-
-
- -
#DIV /0!
$ 370,481
$ 1,147,117
$ 306,316
$ 931,998
$ 348,698 $ 323,454 $ 1,390,884
25.07%
25,245
Revs Over /(Under) Expen
_
$ (216,715)
$ (118,806)
$ (93,836)
$ 7,043
$ (124,284) $ (88,929) $ (420,984)
MONTHLY BUDGET REPORT - STORMWATER FUND Y -T -D OVERVIEW
APRIL 2010 PRELIMINARY - 33.33% of Year Completed
2008
Y -T -D
Actual
2008
Annual
Actual
2009
Y -T -D
Actual
2009
Annual
Actual
2010
Y -T -D
Actual
2010
Y -T -D
Projected
2010
Adopted
Budget
2010 Actual
as a %
of budget
Variance
Actual vs.
Projected
Comments
REVENUE
Grants
Miss Revenue
Utility Revenue
Transfers from other funds
I
4,748
1,578
33,295
I
-
17,290
204,345
-
5,658
3,435
39,996
-
12,246
192,320
-
2,097
49,887
-
-
1,925
52,050
-
5,000
7,700
208,200
-
27.23%
23.96%
0.00%
172
(2,163)
TOTAL
$ 39,620
$ 221,635
$ 49,088
$ 204,566
$ 51,984 $ 53,975 $ 220,900
23.53%
(1,991)
EXPENDITURES
STORMWATER
Personnel
Materials and Supplies
Support and Services
Capital Outlay
Debt Service
Transfers to Other Funds
4,522
5,302
33,251
-
15,520
7,292
83,332
-
-
2,146
354
12,778
-
18,558
1,795
46,377
-
$
10,099
605
13,316
2,860
-
$ 16,119
3,100
19,200
3,000
$
48,357
9,300
57,600
395,265
-
20.88%
6.51%
23.12%
0.72%
0.00%
0.00%
(6,020)
(2,495)
(5,884)
(140)
-
TOTAL
1 $ 43,074
$ 106,144
$ 15,278
$ 66,729
$ 26,880 $ 41,419 $ 510,522
5.27%
(14,539)
Total Expenditures
$ 43,074
$ 106,144
$ 15,278
$ 66,729
$ 26_ ,880 $ 41,419 $ 510,522
5.27%
(14,539)
-
-
-
-
Transfers Out
Total Expenditures & Transfers
$ 43,074
$ 106,144
$ 15,278
$ 66,729
$ 26,880 $ 41,419 $ 510,522
5.27%
(14,539)
Revs Over /(Under) Expen
$ (3,454)
$ 115,490
$ 33,810
$ 137,836
$ 25,104 $ 12,556 $ (289,622)
MONTHLY BUDGET REPORT - RECYCLING FUND Y -T -D OVERVIEW
APRIL 2010 - 33.33% of Year Completed
2008
2008
2009
2009
2010
2010
2010
2010 Actual
Variance
T
Y -T -D
Actual
Annual
Actual
Y -T -D
Actual
Annual
Actual
Y -T -D
Actual
Y -T -D
Projected
Adopted
Budget
as a %
of budget
Actual vs.
Projected
Comment
REVENUE
I
County Aid
Misc Revenue
Utility Revenue
Transfers from other funds
352
7,393
-
17,290
204,345
-
727
11,956
-
727
17,956
345
38,483
-
-
533
37,800
-
21,000
1,600
151,200
-
0.00%
21.56%
25.45°/
0.00%
(188)
683
-
TOTAL
$ 7 ,745
$ 221,635
$ 12,683
$ 18,683
$ 38,828 $ 38,333 $ 173,800
22.34%
495
EXPENDITURES
RECYCLING
Personnel
15,520
521
18,558
$
2,173
$
1,599
$ 4,796
45.31%
574
Materials and Supplies
Support and Services
Capital Outlay
Debt Service
128
28,054
-
7,292
83,332
-
112
28,126
1,795
46,377
-
470
55,584
-
167
55,722
-
500
167,167
-
93.95%
33.25%
0.00%
0.00%
303
(138)
-
Includes 4 months' service expense
Transfers to Other Funds
-
0.00%
I
I
TOTAL
$ 28,181
$ 106,144
$ 28,759
$ 66,729
$ 58,227 $ 57,488 $ 172,463
33.76%
739
Total Expenditures
$ 28,181
$ 106,144
$ 28,759
$ 66,729
$ 58 ,227 $ 5 $ 17 2,463
33.76%
739
-
-
-
_.
-
Transfers Out
$
28,181
$ 106,144
$
28,759
$ 66,729
$
58,227
$
57,488
$ 172,463
33.76%
739
Total Expenditures & Transfers
Revs Over /(Under) Expen
$ (20,436)
$ 115,490
$ (16,075)
$ (48,046)
$ (19,399) $ (19,154) $ 1,337
MONTHLY BUDGET REPORT - SOUTHSHORE CENTER FUND Y -T -D OVERVIEW
APRIL 2010 - 33.33% of Year Completed
2008
2008
2009
2009
2010
2010
2010
2010 Actual
Variance
Y -T -D
Actual
Annual
Actual
Y -T -D
Actual
Annual
Actual
Y -T -D
Actual
Y -T -D
Projected
Adopted
Budget
as a %
of budget
Actual vs.
Projected
Comments
REVENUE
Charges For Service
Misc Revenue
Transfers from other funds
Not
Available
Not
Available
Not
Available
35,986
886
16,852
769
14,427
550
-
43,280
1,650
-
38.94%
46.62%
0.00%
2,425
219
-
TOTAL
$
$
$
$ 36,871
$ 17,621 $ 14,977 $ 44,930
39.22%
2,644
EXPENDITURES
SOUTHSHORE CENTER
Not
Not
Not
12,241
$
-
$ -
Materials and Supplies
Support and Services
Capital Outlay
Debt Service
Transfers to Other Funds
Available
Available
Available
50,410
13,686
-
466
23,994
-
4,400
14,652
-
-
13,200
43,956
-
-
3.53°/
54.59%
0.00%
0,00%
0.00%
(3,934)
9,342
-
TOTAL
$
$
$
$ 76,337
$ 24,460 $ 19,052 $ 57,156
42.80%
5,408
Total Expenditures
$
$
$
$ 76,337
$ 24,460 $ 19, $ 57,156
42.80%
5,408
-
-
-
Transfers Out
Total Expenditures & Transfers
$
$
$
$ 76,337
$ 24,460 $ 19,052 $ 57,156
42.80%
5,408
Revs Over/(Under) Expen
__
$
$
$
$ (39,466)
$ (6,839) $ (4,075) $ (12,226)