Loading...
08-09-10 CC Reg AgPCITY OF SHOREWOOD CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MONDAY, AUGUST 9, 2010 AGENDA 1. CONVENE CITY COUNCIL MEETING A. Roll Call B. Review Agenda 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. City Council Work Session Minutes, July 19, 2010 B. City Council Work Session Minutes, July 26, 2010 C. City Council Regular Meeting Minutes, July 26, 2010 3. CONSENT AGENDA - Motion to approve items on Consent Agenda & Adopt Resolutions Therein: NOTE: Give the public an opportunity to request an item be removed from the Consent Agenda. Comments can betaken or questions asked following removal from Consent Agenda A. Approval of the Verified Claims List B. Massage Therapist Licenses C. Televise Sanitary Sewer on the Islands 4. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR (No Council action will be taken) 5. PUBLIC HEARING 6. REPORTS AND PRESENTATIONS 7. PARKS 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7:00 P.M. Mayor Lizke _ Bailey _ Turgeon _ Woodruff _ Zerby _ Attachments Minutes Minutes Minutes Claims List Planning Director's CAF Engineer's CAF S. PLANNING - Report by Representative 9. ENGINEERING /PUBLIC WORKS CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA — August 9, 2010 Page 2 of 2 Attachments 10. GENERAL/NEW BUSINESS A. Council Chambers Signage Administrator's CAF 11. STAFF AND COUNCIL REPORTS A. Administrator and Staff 1. Waterford Pond Outlot A Maintenance Engineer's Report B. Mayor and City Council 12. ADJOURN CITY OF 5755 Country Club Road . Shorewood, Minnesota 55331 . 952- 960 -7900 Fax: 952- 474 -0128 • www.ci.shorewood.mn.us • cityhalloci.shorewood.mmus Executive Summary Shorewood City Council Regular Meeting Monday, 09 August, 2010 7:00 p.m. A 5:30 P.M. Council Work Session is scheduled this evening. Agenda Item 43A: Enclosed is the Verified Claims List for Council approval. Agenda Item #313: The City has received three more therapeutic massage licenses in conjunction with the La Vida Massage, locating in the Shorewood Village Shopping Center. Subject to verification of credentials, staff recommends approval of the licenses. A secondary recommendation is that these licenses be handled administratively in the future, since there is no Code requirement that the Council approve the licenses. Agenda Item #3C: Staff received two quotes for the Sanitary Sewer Jet Vacuum Cleaning, Main Line Televising, Structure Inspection, Later Inspection and Internal Chemical Grouting project. Staff recommends that the City Council direct staff to work with Pipe Services Corporation for the project not to exceed $20,000. Agenda Item 48: A Planning Commission representative will report on the recent Planning Commission meeting. Agenda Item #I OA: Staff contacted a few organizations for a sign behind the dais in the council chambers. A concept for the sign is attached. Staff is seeking direction from council. #2A CITY OF SHOREWOOD CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION MONDAY, JULY 19, 2010 MINUTES 1. CONVENE CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD COUNCIL CHAMBERS 5:30 P.M. Mayor Lizae called the meeting to order at 5:45 P.M. The meeting was de #fie A. Roll Call Present. Mayor Lizae; Councilmembers Bailey (arriv ®d;l t5:�7 P.M. Administrator Heck; and Planning Directov iels6 Absent: Councilmember Zerby B. Review Agenda Mayor Lizee recommended that because 1360tor of Public in attendance this evening the discussion ab6t t13 : gnipr the Local Street Reconstruction CIP be post poneduat voiced her objection to doing that. Turgeon stated Counca they can be answered at a later date if need be. Co ncilte'`i'er this evening. Woodruff moved, To .. Liz6e dissenting. ° 2. 2010 BiJ ,G ¢s SS s Mayor Iy zee asked AdmiiOf from ljgtll °Councilmember T doing it tJta(ray She stated discussed. AdministratorHedk . §,fated Budget during its J o 2( adjustments which hav;;;(ae evening. a quorum. and Woodruff; V ,. rks'Br'own and Engineer Landini were not Caprta(Iinprovement Program (CIP) and can be pre4 - Wi. Councilmember Turgeon n�ers cari ask their questions tonight and c9 uff supported asking the questions approving t[ agenda as presented. Motion passed 2/1 with highlight the questions he received and answered by email ti Woodruff. Councilmember Turgeon objected to and response should be discussed when the related budget is mcil discussed the second draft of the 2011 General Fund Operating , work session. During that work session Council identified some budget incorporated into draft 3 of the budget which will be discussed this Heck explained the meeting packet for this evening contained a document which reflects the impact on the 2011 operating budget of a 0.0% levy increase, a 1% levy increase, a 1.5% levy increase, a 2% levy increase and the use of $160,000 in General Fund reserves as well as the use of $40,000 from the Liquor Fund. The document also reflects the impact of a 0.0% increase along with no transfers in from other funds and no use of General Fund reserves. Heck then explained in draft 3 of the operating budget he removed the $30,000 expense item for a monument sign at City Hall and signs at the major entry points into the City. He added $3,200 to the CITY OF SHOREWOOD WORK SESSION MEETING MINUTES July 19, 2010 Page 2 of 9 Streets and Roads budget for the purchase of 4 — 8 green reflective standard signs along Highway 7. Under Professional Services he separated out civil attorney fees and prosecuting attorney costs. He separated the costs for Excelsior Fire District (EFD) services and Mound Fire Department (MFD) services. He updated the information in the Southshore Community Center operating budget, noting he thought the projected 2011 revenue seems reasonable. He reduced the transfer amount into the Equipment Replacement Fund to $50,000 in 2011 and $75,000 in 2012 —2014; it had been $100,000. He increased the transfer amount into the Street Reconstruction Fund to $750,000 in 2011 from the budgeted amount of $700,000 in 2010. Heck stated a there are a couple of questions that Council needs to answer; 0A,&st is whether or not to use reserves to help balance the budget. Based on the draft 3 budget revenue and expense projections a levy of $4,180,973 is needed. Heck explained the current levy am ott of, $4,774,672 would cover all 2011 operations and $599,824 in transfers to improvement fungi Draft: 3 contemplates $842,000 in transfers. There are two main fund balances from which reserOss can lie taken; the General Fetid undesignated reserves and the Liquor Fund. The General Fuu&6'al n`ee Policy requires the General Fund reserves to be 55% - 60% of the upcoming year's budgetodibperating expendttures'h4sed on the draft 3 2011 operating budget the reserve amount should be $2 961,336 — $3 230,549. Tae 20Q9 year -end audited General Fund Balance was $$3,555,724 (or <66% the ado t d 2010 General Ful budget and the draft 3 2011 General Fund budget). =t, Heck then explained the 2009 audited balance in the Liquor Fng 4 was $865,111 which is from liquor operations and the proceeds from the sale o3 �e „liquor operations -,ere are varying views among the Councilmembers as to how those funds shod 6e Gsed. He indicated $ f 's willingness to prepare a brief article for the City's newsletter and a surrey on`#e Gity's websrt$`asking for residents' input on how the funds in the Liquor Fund should be us6d He dget programmed a transfer of $18,842 from the Liquor Fund 1 Heck went on to explain Ee trans'&' into the Park apital Improvement Fund remains at $42,000. He recommends increas�i dt transfer amount $45 42012 — 2014 and then to $50,000 in 2015 — 2020. His rationale for doing sb is s jhere ate tennis courts qt'i' Badger, Cathcart and Manor parks and the approximate cost to reconstructs tai oot ahty is.aauinimum of $200,000. Heck statee proposel3draft 3 opgturg budget reflects a 1.4% decrease in revenues when compared to the 203 b budgeted revs ,,and a e�ecreasg of 1.2% in operating expenditures when compared to the 201Q3budgedexpenditures Councilmembbf Jurgeon askeVwhere the costs for the utility rate study conducted n 2009 were allocated to. Atgtitstrator Heck' explained they should have been distributed equitably to the Water Fund, Sewer Fund asiOtormwAtbr Management Utility Fund. Couneilmember Woodrin(Ntated according to Administrator Heck's documents $38,376 is needed to balance draft 3 of the 2010 General Fund operating budget which contemplates a 0.0% levy increase over the 2010 levy, the use of $160,000 in General Fund undesignated reserves and the use of $40,000 from the Liquor Fund. He explained that leaving the transfer to the Street Reconstruction Fund at the $700,000 2010 budgeted amount (the draft 3 budget reflects an amount of $750,000) would more than balance the budget. He stated he advocates a 0.0% levy increase for 2011. He stated he thought there are a few line items that need further investigation; his email identified some of them. The draft budget doesn't appear to include license /maintenance fees for the financial system software. There are expense items in the budget that could be paid for with a transfer from other designated funds (e.g., the signage management software could be paid for out of the Technology Fund). CITY OF SHOREWOOD WORK SESSION MEETING MINUTES July 19, 2010 Page 3 of 9 Councilmember Woodruff then stated the fine tuning of the 2011 operating budget can be done over the next six weeks. For purposes of this evening's discussion he was comfortable with the draft 3 2011 budget once the $50,000 reduction in the transfer to the Street Reconstruction Fund is made. Administrator Heck stated the cost for the maintenance of the financial system software is included in the Financial Budget in the line item Maintenance of Equipment. There is $6,700 budgeted for the licensing. Mayor Liz6e asked what the size of operating budget cushion would be based on Councilmember Woodruffs recommendation. Administrator Heck stated it would be $14,000,- $15,000. Mayor Liz6e stated it's her recollection that during the July 12 °i work ses�lon budget discussion there had been some interest expressed in having a 2% 2011 levy increase. Councilmember Bailey stated he is willing to go forwards= with C©iuhcilmember Woodruff 's recommendation for the 2011 operating budget. But, before`theiend of the yea( be Council to discuss if some of the funds in the Liquor Fund should16 transferred into the Sttset Reconstruction Fund. He indicated he is unwilling to give up on increaAilbg the Streel, Reconstruction PIjat1 at this time. Councilmember Woodruff stated he thought there should be d sepafdie` libeting to specifically discuss the Liquor Fund, the Street Reconstruction Fund and the Park Cajiitgl�nprovement Fund. Mayor Liz6e asked the Councilmembers if;they had interest in �ffi4u3g through the budget detail this evening. Councilmember Turgeon stated she hail s4, w questions that s e; �aglight should be discussed. Councilmember Turgeon questioned what the $t300 covered. She wondered how many and what typ6ibfl prosecution costs for 2009 e questioned if it may by case basis. She state f most dot e cases are tr4 Professional Services /Pt0aecution CoYl Tact be moved in Police /Miscellaneous Seri ces wh10) according to forfeiture vehicles. She asked af� costs fnFlpourt wanted to hav¢lb-dleahunderstand[ n of what thb ionthlty, etginer-for prosecuting attorney services es`es the Cif bias. She requested a break down of better fina cially to pay for the services on a case is related then she suggested the line item titled g er Police. She questioned the $4,000 budgeted , t 7udget documentation is for tow charges for ertime are also included in that line item. She cost for police services is. Administrator Heck explatti that most of the cases the prosecuting attorney deals with are generated throq t th6,§outh Lake Mirrhotonka Police partment ( SLMPD). Violations of the City's Ordinance or State 1 aw a:p an et dealt with by the SLMPD. The SLMPD refers them to the prosecuting attorney. The'p�sec attorq$ may also handle civil cases for the City. Director Nielsen stated the prosecuting attoi*y,,has not haxrdled any land use issues in quite some time, and the relatively new Administrative Cod& olrt r iPut process may address many land use issues. He clarified the monthly retainer fee is $2 i C(o 27,499 annually) and the fee will remain the same for 2011. He explained the City is billed mdi 9"'tlly for the forfeitures. The 2011 budget of $35,000 is based on his estimate of what the City may be•doing for forfeitures. He stated he would be comfortable reducing the 2011 budgeted amount to the 2010 budgeted amount is $33,000. Heck went on to explain the costs for towing and other services have been accounted for in the Public Works budget. They are not in the Police /Miscellaneous Services line item. Those will begin to show up under the budget for Police in the City's operating budget going forward. He will investigate what gets classified to that line item. The City is billed for court overtime, and the more prosecutions there are the more overtime there is. Prosecution costs are for law enforcement activities but they are not related specifically to Police. He thought the line item Prosecution Contract needs to remain under Professional Services. He stated independent of whether or not the City contracts for police services or has its own CITY OF SHOREWOOD WORK SESSION MEETING MINUTES July 19, 2010 Page 4 of 9 police department the City still needs a prosecuting attorney. I indicated he will gather detail on what the prosecution charges for 2009 were for. He noted the City is reimbursed for some of its forfeiture related charges. Councilmember Turgeon reiterated her point of view. From her vantage point the prosecution costs, towing costs, court overtime costs, and costs for staying in the Hennepin County jail are all part of police related costs. The cost for police services is more than the SLMPD Operating Budget. Councilmember Woodruff stated he would like detail on 2009 prosecution costs also, noting lie did not necessarily need to know that for this budget discussion. ,ls� it is Mayor Lizde asked Administrator Heck to provide Council with a allocated across the operating departments and the enterprise opera The highlights of the discussion about the draft 3 2011 City Council • It includes $19,112 for a Administration how personnel time is I operating b*d" are as follows w � „a Ifirrease pool. � ° Any small amount of unemployment co im the former city adralpistrator would be pa It's anticipated there °*lllnot be any need msation that would need to be paid to ;Opt of unallocated expenses. it 06,i tractual services in 2011. • The budget for the Cif ' s §hare;<of employee insurance went down because it's based on the actual cos`(§, for 2011 The cost for4`full -time employee is $10,600 per year.1 ,_" Local Goverami fit. q • PeI §onnel vests are up whet, compared to the 2010 budget. Part of the deputy $eIirk's timeW, s allocated to ections in 2010 and it's reallocated to this budget • The City usb§ mailing hour lo mail utility bills and its newsletter. It has a ,n postage ttjeter fot'o i;r'eguIdr mailings. The mailing house budgeted amount of • Pers6nitel costs ark down compared to the 2010 budget because 2011 is not an election liyear ➢ ';Finance ,. The staking wage for the new finance director is budgeted for approximately $80 00fh'The wage is significantly lower than the past director's position. ➢ Prof s4bpal SUrvices • The { Prosecution Contract budget will be reduced to $33,000; the same as the .2f) 10 budget. ➢ Planning • Travel /Conferences /Schools increased to $6,820 from the 2010 budgeted amount of $1900. Some of the increase is for planning commissioner training ($2000 for miscellaneous training, $700 for GTS training, and $520 for Sensible Land Use Coalition seminars). • Liz6e expressed concern with the budgeted amount. The City provided the Commissioners with an opportunity for some in -house training in 2010. Also, there have been fewer revenues from planning related items. She recommended reducing the Travel /Conferences /Schools budget by $2000. CITY OF SHOREWOOD WORK SESSION MEETING MINUTES July 19, 2010 Page 5 of 9 • Turgeon questioned the reduction for SLUC seminars from $1,000 to $520. • There was consensus to increase the budget for SLUC seminars to $1000, to reduce the budget for miscellaneous training for planning commissioners to $1000, and to eliminate the budget for their GTS training. ➢ Municipal Buildings • Lizke questioned why they hrsurance budget was reduced to $105,000 from the 2010 budgeted amount of $115,000. Heck stated the budget for this line item had been more than what was needed in the past. • Woodruff stated he did not think there is a bbd to budget $5,000 for Maintenance of Buildings. There is a signific n ��Wance in the Building Facilities Fund and some of those funds could ,bee sed for that purpose. • There was consensus to reduced Maintenanc&;bf&tlildings line item to $0.00. ➢ Police '. • LizBe noted there is a SLMPD Cp t4inating CommiItee quarterly meeting scheduled for July 21s` and the „± bmniittee will disct'i ,jhe SLMPD 2011 ro osed budget during this ttieetin Heck stated he veil ' et answers to p P g g g f g s Turgeon's questions. ➢ Fire • The costs for EFD services and MFD Ni es have been broken out. • The MFD formula is based on populhijon property values, land values and number of calls. TWO22013 budgeted amour*k$25,000. • Turgeon asked if it W Td Ue )?etter for the City to,gpntract for MFD services on a per incident basis. Hepk l out this ➢ Protective Inspections jfl • A cellgr hone charge bite tt may Iravii added to this budget. • ThellnVn7 - inspection s: is down; therefore, the budget for mileage was ➢ City due to 20% of an administrative support staff this activity. There i§� 5, , Z00 budgeted4or the purchase of signage inventory management 0 re tha# Auld interconnect with the Geographic Information System (GIS) softtle. WoodTttff,g ked for more justification on this, and if this were to be purcha le rz commended using funds in the Technology Fund for that purpos§ d e'.Turgei expressed concern about this item and the Traffc ControU Contraci " Services budgeted amom�t of $6,800 for conducting an inventory of the City's road signs t j 011 Motor Fuels and Lubrication budget was reduced to $40,000 from the 010 budgeted amount of $43,123 based on 2009 actual and 2010 year -to -date expenditures. Turgeon asked that this be reconsidered; she supported leaving the 2011 budget the same as the 2010 budget. Bailey stated the budget for this line was increased in past years; therefore, he wasn't sure it should be increased. Heck will consider increasing the budget to $43,000. Operating Transfer — Equipment was reduced to $50,000 from the 2010 budgeted amount of $100,000. Heck will research if the $7,000 budgeted for Machinery and Equipment should be a capital or expense item. Woodruff asked for more detail on this item. CITY OF SHOREWOOD WORK SESSION MEETING MINUTES July 19, 2010 Page 6 of 9 ➢ Streets and Roadways • Travel/Conferences /Schools is budgeted at $4,000 for things such as Safe Assure training (which has to be done annually). • Heck noted there are number of training programs all City employees must attend annually. • Turgeon asked who has paid for the random drug testing of Public Works personnel. Heck explained there is a federal mandate that requires anyone with a commercial driver's license be randomly tested for drugs in companies with more than 10 employees. The employer must create0c policy and ensure the employees are randomly tested. A while back the.Dit'y was part of a testing pool but is not any longer. He's not sure when the last €time was anyone was tested. • The transfer to the Street Reconstruction Fu l' Wyllie reduced to $700,000; the same as the 2010 budgeted amount s , ➢ Snow and Ice Control gg�� • Personnel costs are higher than tare 2010 budgeted t because of the reallocation of labor based on ,actual time sheet informatto a= .Labor allocation will be reviewed. ➢ Traffic Control /Street Lighting :x ' • Turgeon stated she did not think the C have to pay'to replace LED bulbs in semaphore traffic lights on H`l vay 7 and County Road 19 and other non -City roads Hecwill research this. '` • Contractual Services a0sts an the anount of 96.'400 pr conducting an inventory of road signs will be difioussina in. = ➢ Saiitation/Weeds /Waste Removt;( • The labor costs are associated, nth the at i f cleanup day. labor ➢ Tree Mainteikanu�.= €;. ' • I ce stateil Council had discussed the possibility of doing a tree inventory to 4, E i= 160k for diseits�d r trees in the 6ity's,parks and right-of-ways. Heck stated nothing has it�en budgeted for that effti 'because Council has not yet decided if that should, ire tlrit IxekspP statpd'Staff and the Planning Commission have been says workm 'q ,develop�ig ifseased tree management plan and that should be jrk�k. rgtlapleted'sst� crime in August. Staff has received some inventory cost "hip shat § 'umbers aaythe fange of $30,000 — $40,000; Staff is trying to identify ways to ret{u e the co -INThe goal is to have more finite number in a month or so. Turge'c4C asked_Jf any residents have contacted the City to complain about disease¢,trees. Nielsen stated the plan may include helping residents with the .. initial evaluation of their trees and then encourage them to contact an arborist. Heck suited he will add an expense item for the inventory to the budget. Bailey skpoiyhat the budget for that be realistic. He then asked if an inventory would wto be conducted again in 4 years if one was conducted in 2011; he didn't ,fiwant to have to repeat the inventory in just a few years. This item will be discussed again once the diseased tree management plan is complete. There was consensus that the City should not take on the liability for determining if trees on private property were diseased. ➢ Parks and Recreation • Personnel costs have increased due to the reallocation of labor. • Maintenance of Equipment was increased to $5000 from the 2010 budgeted amount of $1500 to cover general maintenance in the parks. Replacement equipment had been paid for out of the Parks Capital Improvement Fund even if it was a small item. CITY OF SHOREWOOD WORK SESSION MEETING MINUTES July 19, 2010 Page 7 of 9 • Heck recommended the transfer to the Park Capital Improvement Fund be increased to $45,000 at some point. Bailey stated the reason it was reduced to $42,000 from $45,000 for 2010 because $3,000 was left in the Parks operating budget for programs. Turgeon stated she did not want to increase the transfer. Bailey suggested some of each year's transfer to the Fund should be saved to help pay for future large capital projects. • Lizde questioned if the $4000 budgeted for the Three Bay Treatment program for aquatic invasive species in 2011 . is sufficient. She asked if there is flexibility in how the $70,000 total budget for Contractual Services could be utilized, to which Heck responded there is. Liz& noted t1 e` 's,,nothing budgeted for removal of Buckthorn and as long as there is,ilpxibility she is okay with that. Turgeon indicated she preferred to concentro,* on moving Buckthorn from the parks before the right -of -ways if staff has e. ➢ Southshore Community Center • Heck stated he thought the 2011 revgdeprojections were °a,�hievable. • Heck recommended not including Staff time in this budget. What time is spent is part of their normal dutise,,,_,,' • Maintenance of Building costs are for the rpttine maintenance, niid cleaning of the SSCC. • Capital Outlay /Building & Structure neez if any, will be funded out of the Public Facilities FurvA'- Administrator Heck summarized his understanciing of wit Council has 4s' W for regarding draft 3 of the 2011 operating budget. ,l ➢ The transf5ga1k0, t Street Recoriodction Fun�4'=wvill be reduced to $700,000 from $750,000,11' ➢ He willlprp ,yide detail tin what the 2009 Prosecution Contract charges were for. ➢ The budgei *, Proseotttion Contract will;08 reduced to $33,000 from $35,000. ➢ The budget ibr Plalihl g Txave4 Oil aces & Schools will be reduced as discussed l6 Iis evening ➢ ' Mumc€p41 uildmgsJ aintenance of Buildings will be reduced to $0.00 from $5000. He will res;ih if a per Incident type contract with the Mound Fire Department for fire services is pon ghle and it so'would it be beneficial to the City. ➢ ,, He will get stai1 information on replacing LED bulbs in semaphore traffic lights on �Iighway 7 and County Road 19. ➢ Ife vv 11 get more'detail on the signage management software and consulting services for concineting a signage inventory. ➢ Once die ceased tree management plan is done Staff will discuss the possibility of condueti ; a tree inventory of the City's parks and right -of -ways. ➢ He wilPprovide a staffing allocation chart. Councilmember Bailey stated he appreciated receiving a lot of budget detail as it helps bring items to the forefront for discussion. He expressed the quality of detail will get even better after a finance director has been hired. Councilmember Woodruff stated based on the discussion this evening the 2011 operating budget will have an approximate $20,000 positive balance and no levy increase. He thought the surplus could be "put CITY OF SHOREWOOD WORK SESSION MEETING MINUTES July 19, 2010 Page 8 of 9 in a sock" or Council could look for contingencies as the budget process moves forward. He expressed he was pleased with the budget. Administrator Heck stated the 2011 special levy is $604,000. Mayor Liz6e asked Councilmembers what time they will be able to get to a budget work session on July 26, 2010. The focus of the work session will be the CIP. There was consensus to start work session at 6:00 P.M Councilmember Bailey stated the Park Commission was a little stunned by Council's request that it prioritize parks projects. There apparently was some miseommum4atlp ,In the past few months. Iti appeared that it was a complete surprise to the Commissioners t they bldn't run the Park Capital Improvement Fund into a deficit state of $200,000 or so. He ex lair0d to the CUtnmission that it can have a project wish list but its recommended CIP has to be ftscaJ7 spo Bible and t§4rk within the $42,000 contribution to the Fund. The Commission was surprised'y the request. He thought Councilmember Woodruff s statement to the Commission a while ago tolling the Commission it should Uin4Ng" about additional ideas morphed into a grandiose CIP. The°'ofigifial CIP hild -been scaled down ajl noted the Commission will not have had the opportunity to adjust the Cip po 7 July 26 "' work'session. Administrator Heck explained the Commission is frustrated becati4s,jt worked with TKDA to update the Parks Master Plan and Council thought the Nai was too grandioseho : ",Commission developed a scaled down CIP and was told to think big, only to h6 told,the CIP needs to 6 scaled back. The CIP software allows for entering and tracking things for future congf4efation which and Z't part of the CIP. Mayor Liz6e departed the meeting at 7:25 P.M. Councilmember Woodruff stated hoAd tell the Commission to think big. The Commission went from a very tiny CIP budget l [lit t wasn`t = §pending to a budget that can't be funded. He suggested the Commission prepare a proij" f fast of l"Ost have projects 4hil a list of should do projects. AdmimstratoxlUtted Staff�wll revuecvkB4tiipment Replacement CIP to ensure the items on the list are ac ally needed zprpvide &JYrces. For example, he was not sure a track excavator is needed in 2011 bgyiuse it can only be Used in the - jprmg,and fall and that's only five months of the year. It may be that ae equipment could p rent ed U&dn't think Staff had discussed that type of thing in detail in the past Administrator 1`I6�, stated Coil needs to have another serious discussion about roadway projects. It needs to review the`2p Year PaVsment Improvement Plan (PMP) and determine if it makes sense. Are the roadways identified aS t i'drities for improvements the correct ones? The Street Reconstruction Fund will run out of funds in 2g based on the CIP. Council has to decide how to deal with that. Councilmember Bailey asked that Director Brown review the PMP to evaluate if some of the roadways rated as needing to be reconstructed are traveled so lightly that it may not make sense to even think about reconstructing them for a long time. Councilmember Turgeon stated the 2011 CIP programs Star Lane and Star Circle for reconstruction. She noted there are only about 18 houses in the area and they are dead end streets. She suggested dead end streets be overlaid or just sealcoated. CITY OF SHOREWOOD WORK SESSION MEETING MINUTES July 19, 2010 Page 9 of 9 Councihnember Woodruff agreed Council needs to make smart choices about how to use the limited funds. But, other things such as resolving stormwater drainage concerns have to be taken into consideration. For example, stormwater management issues were taken into consideration when improvements to Harding Lane were discussed. Administrator Heck stated some of that won't be known until feasibility studies have been completed. He noted the City's stormwater plan has related information. Comrcilmember Woodruff stated he went on a boat cruise on Lake Minnetonka hosted by the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District and the University of Minnesota. The organizatidyWhejd two sessions to teach attendees about best management practices and phosphorus loading Attendees were able to see good and not so good practices around the Lake. One of the messages was a,i h*palities do roadway projects they need to find a way to minimize runoff. 3. ADJOURN 3 : extta. t £ar Bailey moved, Woodruff seconded, Adjourning the C Council Work Session of my 26, 2010, at 7:40 P.M. Motion passed 4/0 ret E'. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED Christine Freeman, Recorder ifl Chrusiiie Lizoe, Mayor ATTEST l# ,d - €s 3 �5 Brian Heck, City Admimsttor /Cloik tYr f�. #ZB CITY OF SHOREWOOD CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION MONDAY, JULY 26, 2010 MINUTES CONVENE CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION Mayor Lizee called the meeting to order at 6:00 P.M. A. Roll Call 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD COUNCIL CHAMBERS 6:00 P.M. n, Woodruff and of Public Works passed 4/0. to leave the transfer to ias been asked to revise also decided to reduce 10; the same as in 2010. at capital improvement scussed possibly using in 2011. cut CIP and the Local ;xpenditures in 2011 of $1 million in 2011 for k Capital Improvement base of a replacement dump truck with a snow plow and other related equipment and a track excavator. Director Brown explained the dump truck that is proposed to be replaced is a 1988 vehicle and it's one of the City's best trucks. The truck is extremely rusted out. The proposed track excavator will replace the tractor backhoe. The backhoe is used for ditching and ditch cleaning. During storm events the backhoe is used to clean out culverts that have become plugged during the storm. There is not time during the storm events to call a contractor to provide that service or to go and rent a piece of equipment. Over time a lot of ditches in the City have started to fill up, particularly in the west end of the City. Therefore, a lot more Present. Mayor Lizee; Councilmembers Bailey (arriu�,pt 09 P.M.)' I Zerby; Administrator Heck; Planning DlydeT Mblsen; and Dii Brown CITY OF SHOREWOOD WORK SESSION MEETING MINUTES July 26, 2010 Page 2 of 6 ditch maintenance will have to be done. The estimated cost to purchase a "garden variety" backhoe is in line with the amount budgeted. If the backhoe is replaced with a track excavator it will likely be a used piece of equipment because the cost for a new excavator is more than what is budgeted. Brown noted that one of the reasons the Equipment Replacement Fund has such a healthy balance is he always considers the availability of used equipment. For example, the City purchased a reconditioned truck and put a water tanker on it, and it purchased a used jetter. Brown related that Administrator Heck has asked if equipment, such as skid steer with a small �I'k excavator on it, could be used instead. The reach of the piece of everything were possible with a skid steer with a small attachment c of equipment; that's not what they are using. In response to a question from Mayor Lizde, Director Brown e: mounted vehicle. It will allow Public Works staff to get ir(%6'hti where ditching will have to be done. For many years staff #1§ed to I Lorenz Road; the wetland that leads out to Lake Minn tohka. That , , < :.. concern that the backhoe would be lost due to the WW6bil4itions wheeled backhoe. It's not impossible to get into those typeso4rea equip�' hpust be considered. If ont(ti tors would be using that type s° faired a k excavator is a track 11 c tho 0ound is softer; areas and ditch badktl',,area along Grant ;sn't been one f6' i ars,because of Ghat area. The curtei3t �iackhoe is a In response to a question from Councilme*er Zerby, Director Himyn explained the current backhoe is M.. used about once every two weeks. It's also tlsptJ 3 4 times a year pn an emergency basis during storm events. It's used to clean out Crescent Beach '40ta #could be done afiub t diaIly if time permitted. Councilmember Zerby then asked if it's possibfe, to ha any nearby dity to share in the cost of track excavator. l' In response to a questioWfrom Maybr Director Brown stated the cost for backhoe is $74,256. A new track excavator W6a cost over ,1100,000 He will research if there is a used excavator for no more than the cost of a new backhos ;.He thbuaht the excavat6iimore versatile than a backhoe. Director Bro"I atped when pi blic Woiks staff"is on a roadway excavating with the current tractor backhoe tats `equipmerti h to be pdWipned perpendicular to the excavation area. That shuts the roadway down t affic. What's du i?t has trr be pillcd on the roadway. Another piece of equipment has to be brougli€ the site to load tlI¢:npaterial �tt has been dugout into a dump truck sitting along side the backhoe track excavator sits' arallel.to the excavation area. The dump truck can be along side and be loaded wit hod r ,the need for another piece of equipment because the excavator is able to pivot. In response to a gdWirin from iC ouncilmember Turgeon, Director Brown stated he was confident Public Works personnel wo ilil,a to run the track excavator. Councilmember Turgeori'commented the proposed transfer to the Equipment Replacement Fund in 2011 is $50,000; the 2010 budgeted transfer amount is $100,000. In response to a question from Councilmember Turgeon, Administrator Heck stated he had originally proposed increasing the transfer to the Street Reconstruction Fund to $750,000 in 2011. Council later decided to reduce it to $700,000 for 2011. Councilmember Woodruff stated some months ago Council discussed installing a vehicle lift in the Public Works mechanics bay. He thought there was consensus to do that and to do it in 2010. There is CITY OF SHOREWOOD WORK SESSION MEETING MINUTES July 26, 2010 Page 3 of 6 nothing included in the CIP for that. Administrator Heck commented that is his recollection also. Heck stated it needs to be added to the CIP. In response to a question from Councilmember Turgeon, Director Brown stated he thought the current backhoe is 25 — 28 years old but he has to verify that. Administrator Heck stated he thought the City had a loader backhoe. Director Brown clarified the City has only a tractor backhoe. j Councilmember Turgeon stated she thought the tractor backhoe is used rljbr,ltl an the track excavator would be. She did not think they would be interchangeable. Director Brown explained the track excavator would replace the tractor backhoe. Brown noted the excav toy would have to be transported on a trailer and he thought the City's trailer would be able to handle tba , In response to a question from Councilmember Turgeon, Dire r,,Brdwn again explained if lie decided to recommend the purchase of a track excavator he would lodk for mused track exchvfpr that would cost approximately the same amount ($75,000) as a basic,baekhoe. Mayor Liz& stated nie is pomfortable with the direction Brown is going, and she thought rt'slibul d be up t� Brown to recomm6otFwhich of the two pieces of equipment the City should purchase. Lizee agre (l the xcg*ator would be snore versatile. Councilmember Zerby stated based on a search he just configured many ways and for various prices = !IZK,, Director Brown explained the estimate cost to pig purchasing a dump truck with a plow is one oft there are so many combinatioq�,. Components of typically enters into 4 — 5 cp )itiai l] ', ¢purchase a Councilmember Woodru: $75,000. Director Brown budgeted Discussion Direetgx� 'rown stated h6iik improetttf program. Asa r and he may hot have been reconstructed d, when it w installation of WiWhnain is r discussion residents lopk at improvements. The surf "q ql Evaluation and Rating `(P'A� the internet a dump truck can be dymp truck i §:$141,426. He stated he thought ffi�#R,Pquipfnent purchases to make because are ni444i%y different manufactures. A buyer t for the track excavator should be changed to ith that. ldmini4tato r # Heck have had many discussions about the City's roadway lstklt of the � he has come to the conclusion that Engineer Landini a : clear a0rthey needed to be regarding when a roadway needed to be as appropriate to reclaim a roadway. A roadway can be reclaimed if the oV nsidered as part of the project. When a roadway project comes up for the surface of the roadway to decide if they think the roadway needs 4he roadway is one of the components considered by the Pavement Surface ER) System. A big part of the issue is with the foundation under the pavement. For example to reconstructing Wedgewood Drive all of the underlying soils had become saturated and the pavement started to buckle. The rapid change in soils caused the surface roadway to deteriorate rapidly. Brown explained if a roadway's surface has deteriorated and the underlying soils are reasonably dry the roadway could potentially be reclaimed provided there are no other reasons to reconstruct it. If a roadway's underlying soils are saturated and moving around due to frost the roadway should be reconstructed. The surface of a roadway with saturated underlying soils could be overlaid and that could last a couple of years. It could also be reclaimed and that would last maybe five years. But, over time the saturated soils will move around due to frost or just being really saturated and the top surface will CITY OF SHOREWOOD WORK SESSION MEETING MINUTES July 26, 2010 Page 4 of 6 deteriorate. He thought Staff has looked at the roadways that need to be reconstructed and determined that the top surface and the underlying soils and sub -soils need to be replaced. There are some roadways identified as needing to be reconstructed that could possible be reclaimed instead. He clarified that not all of the roadways slated for reconstruction in the 20 -Year Pavement Improvement Plan (PMP) can be reclaimed. Brown noted that Star Circle and Star Lane should definitely be reconstructed. The sub -soils under the surfaces are extremely poor. Brown stated that years ago the sitting council members expressed the City 9,4iiWways were in bad shape and they asked Staff what to do about it. A goal was established that all of the City's roadways should have a PASER System rating goal of 4 or higher. It appeared that gOWryas reasonable. It now appears that Council may think that goal is not financially supportable. Clnmcil ht4 deed to decide if the goal should be adjusted to a rating of 3 or higher. $s €3 gaze a. Brown explained the roads have been rated since 2002 2fl04. He will work wit': in ineer Landini to review the roadways' ratings over those years and dgt� mine some type of indicatory o ze lect what's been achieved in roadway improvements. Once the mdib6$ ;have beent etermined Counc sshould be able to decide if the City has made progress with its roadways , s ^3 = ,q >' Councilmember Woodruff stated mitigatior�,,of storm water issues.psgds to be considered when deciding what type of improvements should be maid a roadway. He noted zesidents have indicated there are storm water issues they would like resolved a l bf the proposed 21171.rpstbnstruction of Valleywood 11 Circle and Valleywood Lane. He asked if the need for 4iIla water mitig4bon has been factored into the 20 -Year PNIP. Do any of the roadways classified for rec 4tnkfio have storm water issues that need to be addressed through reconstructiop?#' Director Brown stated shit water will, run a depth of 0 — 4 feet. Therefore, storm water improvements can oftill; e made wrt€aut reconstructing the entire roadway. He explained that a few years ago he proposed develo} pg a project matrix that NKred in die PASER System rating, storm water issues and water main expansltsp r ef tlia k }ts the si -tin council was either not receptive to that being done or it diet art 1}riderstand his`grilposal we'll. :. Counc�j ember Woodruff Muted it's lus understanding that the CIP reflects Public Works' and the City Engi ias, nderstanding of`v bat will hk y need to be done. The feasibility study for Star Circle and Star Lane' *W validate or mva Sate if the need to reconstruct them is correct. Director Brown stated they need to be reconstructed. The bgrings done as part of the study will confirm how deep the issues are. Councilmember Bal1by,, stated ihb one is saying that roadways which need to be reconstructed will be reclaimed instead 13e ittid i d he agrees with a suggestion Councilmember Turgeon has previously made about taking iniq'i' ccount how much a roadway is traveled when deciding what type of improvement is made and when it is made. An infrequently traveled road may have to have a lower PASER System rating than others before it's considered for improvements. He stated the projected future state of roadways currently rated as being okay needs to be factored into the 20 -Year PMP; a suggestion he has made before. Director Brown explained the PASER System rating already accounts for traffic volume because the more a roadway is traveled the faster it deteriorates. He stated that from his vantage point there are very few City roadways where traffic is an issue. They are Smithtown Road, Vine Hill Road and Covington Road. Underlying water conditions and refuse collection trucks deteriorate the roadways more than anything. If the number of refuse haulers could be reduced that would save the City a lot of money on CITY OF SHOREWOOD WORK SESSION MEETING MINUTES July 26, 2010 Page 5 of 6 roadway improvements. He questioned if it might be possible to get neighborhoods to settle on one refuse hauler. He commented that there are times when Public Works personnel are plowing streets and they see 4 — 5 haulers go down the same street. Councilmember Turgeon commented that a refuse hauler approached the residents in her neighborhood about going with that individual hauler, and the residents did that. Councilmember Turgeon stated at one time the City considered reconstructing Amlee Road, Glen Road and Manitou Lane because they were in bad shape. Due to resident resistance the roadways were just sealcoated and the residents are happy with what was done because the roadways had not been sealcoated for many years. Director Brown noted for now the residents are happy. Tpl e6h,stated there are at most 30 houses along Star Circle and Star Lane and she asked if something other than reconstruction could be done to them. A i l Director Brown stated he wanted to attempt to determine a types of pavement improvement methods. He thought for reclamation would last 15 — 20 years. He explained the it between 1970 and 1972 when the sewer system was pultin. Once the per year cost- per -yard for reconstruction, rddat i47 each improvement method can be determined. With regard' currently included in the 20 -Year PMP, the overall indices made with roadway improvements. g 5 Councilmember Bailey stated if the current 1100,, 0.,transfe tripled in order to make headway Council needs to know the improvement efforts could potentially make a sigmfic rt di a t.. Director Brown commented tlrafi t, n er Landmi an$' he have roadways very frequently; Maybe b6cuuse of that their perspec lu hoped that by comin , Vith the inch es and the cost= er -yar understanding of how the i eoaway program is working.a -' ost yar, 'pr year for the various r46W,way with reaso 'gbte underlying soils 11 [der roadways in the lty.were constructed The roadways have lasted"jcu lily 40 years. on and overlay are calculateq � e benefits of d anticipatitm of the rating for roadways not will It 1p in determining if headway is being for roadway, improvements needs to be r increasdtiof say $50,000 or $100,000 to =nce.touncil needs to know that also. to observe the state of the ve about making progress is skewed. He information Council could have a better Councilmem>, Wp nff statedAi ing the' I 19,' 2010, work session he recommended keeping the transfer int0lic Street 1 o4ostruett fund at $700,000 rather than increasing it to $750,000. He did not think t, p' additional $50,(3tt uld make much difference and the $50,000 could be used to help balance the 20'f9 lDerating budget 1 ;agreed th4lihe amount of financing needed to make headway with the roadways fi s to be determin2 . He shed he recollected a discussion a few years ago about the useful life of a re roadway berm one half that of a reconstructed roadway and that reclamation cost about 300o of tiid cps of recons#bction. It doesn't make sense to reclaim a roadway with very poor soils and sub -soils if it sotfly_gomg,lq'last five years. Mayor Lizce stated a road Way has to be suited for reclamation; not all roadways are. Director Brown stated he will not propose reclaiming roadways with very poor soils. He indicated there are many roadways that could be reclaimed. Councilmember Woodruff stated he thought Director Brown and Engineer Landini could come up with information for Council that projects the useful life of a roadway if it's reconstructed, reclaimed or overlaid and what the estimated cost to do each would be. Councilmember Bailey stated the $700,000 transfer can be a placeholder for the moment. But, if Council does not continue the discussion about roadway improvements and the cost to do them yet this year, CITY OF SHOREWOOD WORK SESSION MEETING MINUTES July 26, 2010 Page 6 of 6 Council is just "kicking the can down the road ". He stated Council had a discussion in February 2009 about the long -range plans for roadways and he expressed frustration about not continuing that discussion and how to fund the improvements. From his vantage point he did not think there was a good 10 — 20 year plan that projects what the cost to improve roadways will be and how to fund the plan. Director Brown stated he stands behind the 20 -Year PMP, although some minor tweaking can probably be done to the plan. The PMP is correct. He hoped that Councilmember Bailey was saying that Council has not yet resolved how the PMP should be funded. Bailey stated that is correct, but he wants to know if the PMP includes the deterioration of roadways currently rates as acceptable „Brown stated by using the PASER System ratings it does.'st` -ap Administrator Heck noted that Director Brown had already mentione can determine the aggregate rating for each year starting with 2002. That information will provide additional insight, Discussion moved on to other capital funds.'t Mayor Lizde stated Council had discussed using funds =from the Technology Fund td oprclase signage inventory management software rather that using funds''fr*, the General Fund. Counciliiih ber Turgeon commented that currently the cost for the software is in the Bngifieet hg Budget andp'the cost for the actual inventory is in the Traffic &Control Budget. Counci(eYliber Woodruff reiterated he will not approve the purchase of the signage software unless a cost ben`f° has been done proving it makes sense. Woodruff supported funding ifbt# °pf the Technology Fri#td.. Director Brown explained the $7,000 budgeted for ipr �n the Public�Vorks Budget is for mobile radios and the base system (which is about25 years old, air is adlp fast). The City is required to meet the new Federal Communieahpps Commissions ed u Otnents HWPY was consensus to fund these capital purchases out of the TechrighigyEt id Administrator Heck robhp�ed he will ohange the LockStreet Reconstruction CIP to reflect a transfer of $700,000 rather than He will make the changes to the General Fund regarding the signage software and mobile radio AWIW96 kk 1:00 xeplac� bent. He will program the Technology Fund to include the me p1p e of Sig ge software - litthe $7000 purchase of mobile radios and the base system. E 3. Turgeon moi 3; Woodruff se6gnded, Adjourning the City Council Work Session of July 26, 2010, at 7:00 P M. Rm Dassed 510 Christine Freeman, Christine Lizde, Mayor ATTEST Brian Heck, City Administrator /Clerk #Zc CITY OF SHOREWOOD CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MONDAY, JULY 26, 2010 MINUTES 1. CONVENE CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING Mayor Liz6e called the meeting to order at 7:05 P.M. A. Roll Call Present: Mayor Liz6e; Councilmembers Bailey, Turgeon, City Administrator Heck; Planning Directors) Brown A Absent: None. B. Review Agenda Mayor Liz6e stated Senator Gen Olson i commitments. Item 6.A will be rescheduled Woodruff moved, Zerby seconded, 2. APPROVAL OF A. City Woodruff moved, Turgeon sS 2010, as amegd tar Item 2, be considerd'nias part o� ahe the 5700:000 transfer" City Woodruff n 12, 2010, as 3. CONSENT able to be I acre meeting. 12,2010 a@ iffiuul,Zerby; Attorney Tietjen; and I)Ircctor of Public Works evening because she had other passed 510. lying thejCity Council Work Session Minutes of July 12, rjph %� Sentence 3 change "MSA reimbursement could to ' iMSA reimbursement could be considered as part of Minutes, July 12, 2010 Approving the City Council Regular Meeting Minutes of July 510. Mayor Liz6e reviewed the items on the Consent Agenda. Administrator Heck asked for check #50312 to Local Link in the amount of $131.80 to be pulled from the verified claims list. 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7:00 P.M. Turgeon moved, Woodruff seconded, Approving the Motions Contained on the Consent Agenda and Adopting the Resolutions Therein subject to check #150312 being pulled from the verified claims list. CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES July 26, 2010 Page 2 of 9 A. Approval of the Verified Claims List B. 2011 Road Improvement Project C. Adopting RESOLUTION NO. 10 -037 "A Resolution Adopting the Wildlife Management Plan for White - Tailed Deer in the City of Shorewood ". D. 2011 Mill and Overlay Sanitary Sewer Cleaning and Televising E. Street Sweeping Disposal for 2010 F. Massage Therapist License Motion passed 510. 4. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR P There were no matters from the floor presented this ev nilig,. t¢ 5. PUBLIC HEARING None. qf E 6. REPORTS AND PRESENTATIONS A. Senator Gen ¥ O ¥ Json 4i Senator Gen Olson was ,lulable to 6 p_gsern this evening. She has been rescheduled to a future meeting. 7. PARKS fission �aggext,reporteq on matters°6eii$jdered and actions taken at the July 13, 2010, Park slop meeting ( u li ailed'hi the minutes of that meeting). He asked Councilmernber Bailey to c ouncil with his; pechve n,the Park Commission's confusion about the Park Capital Councilmembbi Dailey explamerhthat during a May 10, 2010, joint meeting of the City Council and Park Commission the Phtk C11 was cFiscussed. He related that Councilmember Woodruff had encouraged the Commission to thm and Council to provide additional funding for projects the Commission thinks are worthwhile � u! mission took that to heart and added additional large, and costly, projects to the CIP. Based on an dual transfer of $42,000 into the Park Capital Improvement Fund the additional projects in the CIP would create a deficit in the Fund. Council has asked the Commission to prioritize the proposed projects and revise the CIP so that the Fund will not go into a deficit state nor reach a balance of zero dollars. The additional projects not included in the CIP should be prioritized and that list should be kept current. Commission Swaggert stated he was somewhat surprised the CIP would create a deficit in the Park Fund of $300,000. Mayor Lizee stated the Park Commission did a great job of looking at the big picture and to the future. CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES July 26, 2010 Page 3 of 9 Couneilmember Woodruff apologized for creating the confusion. He stated that a few years ago Council encouraged the Park Commission to pursue projects because it wasn't spending the money councils had allocated for improvements to parks. The Commission has now created a project list so large it isn't financially doable. He then stated each year a council can decide if it wants to allocate additional funds to park improvements. Commissioner Swaggert stated he will bring this information to the Park Commission A. Manor Park Swing Set M i Director Brown explained that the City had received a request from 0 r6identfor a handicap accessible swing in Manor Park. There are two handicap children in the neigh orhoodalmt would benefit from this. During its July 13, 2010, meeting the Park Commission recoulnu ded a pf yal of changing out the current swing set for a new frame bay with four swings incl�iog swing with bar, concrete path and rubber coating, not to exceed $7,000. Staff is in agpJement With the recorrittit ndation. Administrator Heck explained the Park CommissiolfAisaussed two options. Option A isitinstalling an accessible ath to the current swing set and retro fittm the p g g aef x so J} fligre was an accessible seat for a cost of $4,784.93. Option B is to replace the swing set with s id.Wswing set with accessible swings and with rubberized surface around the entire area. The cost for the ,,swing set and rubberized surface is $5,801.13. _ Mayor Liz6e noted that the new swing set will be instai)etl at,the same t�iit$`as the boundless playground on August 14, 2010. In response to a question f} mn Ccilmember Turgeon, Admuiistrator Heck explained the City can submit the invoice for t ei §wing sef gpart of the grant through the Hennepin County Youth Sports Grant Program. Turgeon ask here the fllihding would come from otherwise. Heck stated there are funds in the Park CIP. Councilmem6ez,4Voodrff stated the gran�rarliount is set; this purchase will not result in the City getting any more grant furl Is:,T)nere6 litnvill,h#6 to be paid for out of the Park CIP. Zerby changing ha bar), ey eCgnded4pproving the Park Commissions recommendation to pursue out`I1► Current sT — j for the new frame bay with four swings (including a concretC and rubber coating, for an amount not to exceed $7,000 and proceed wife the project. Motion passed 5/0. S. Director Nielsen reporteC1.133i matters considered and actions taken at the July 20, 2010, Planning Commission meetin g ( ""'detailed in the minutes of that meeting). He noted the Commission has ` (4 "detailed a mobile tour = August 3, 2010, to look at redevelopment projects and some senior housing that could influence the redevelopment plan for the Smithtown Crossing area. A. Edwards Conditional Use Permit Director Nielsen explained that during its April 6, 2010, meeting the Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider an application from Marry Edwards, the owner of the property at 6170 Ridge Road, for a conditional use permit (C.U.P.) to demolish the existing home on the property and build a new one in its place. The lot is a substandard because it does not have 40,000 square feet of area required in the R- CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES July 26, 2010 Page 4 of 9 IAS, Single - Family Residential /Shoreland zoning districts. It is a buildable lot. It has 28,730 square feet of area and therefore complies with the 70 percent requirement. There are two nonconforming accessory structures on the lot in terms of required setbacks; a two -car garage and a shed /deck structure. Both of those structures were required to be removed as part of the C.U.P. that was granted on May 10, 2010. Nielsen went on to explain that during the permitting process the applicant's attorney challenged the City's authority to require the removal of nonconforming structures, citing an eminent domain statute passed in 2006. The statute states that if a city requires the removal of nonconforming uses the city may be subject to paying fair market value for them. The statute talks about the legal nonconforming uses. The applicant has since applied for a revised C.U.P. The applicant's revised pla}' ates the new home will be located southward on the property. It will be 10 feet from the so 4me. If' will have a 27.5 foot setback on the north side of the lot and when combined with the 2. 5 dbt setback on the existing garage makes 30 feet. Except for the nonconforming structures, the plan,pronhpI e�4ith the minimum side yard setback requirements Nielsen then explained the Planning Commission reopened .t7ie public hearing for tfid: application during its July 20, 2010, meeting. Based on Nielsen's advice, tag Commission voted to recoi ntcrid approval of the revised C.U.P, keeping the existing garage in pl te4 giving the applicant six art %""fhs or upon issuance of occupancy (whichever occurs first) to rerru4 the . h6dYdeck unless the' applicant can demonstrate to the Council and Commission that the structure is iii ffict a legal nonconforming use. Nielsen stated today he decided on a drasti6tl(ly,different reeomm6n4ation than the one he made to the Planning Commission and City Council. He `airtued at ; I is new recor"lldation after again going over the original site plan and comparing it to tln8 City's nmg Code atl' discussing it with the City Attorney. He explained that by definition side setbacks de n9f extend the entire length of the lot. They extend from the required front setback to the iear ,4�;'tback Ttt 1 Xisting garage and shed /deck are nonconforming with respeQON , eIfront and rear ` tbacks. They%` are not located within the side yard setback. The existing garage appeae`st{Z be protected b) the eminent domain statute. The question remains as to when the shed /dP 6y1the lake was originally built. The City's 1966 aerial survey does not show the shed /deck was there. Also, atg`ff was pot able to find a re'eoid of a building pennit having been issued for the structure after 1966. Nielsen tl{gastated itskn recomtildatnon is for the C.U.P. to allow the new house to be put 10 feet from tl) siorth property lirn gn a mmtmma gf,20 feet from the south property line. The existing garage is Prot ect the eminent doryta(n statufae explained the plan includes creating a new driveway to sery ice the geyy house. The CityTodc has a requirement that there can only be one driveway per 120 feet. The applie arit4 ds to use the isting garage for additional storage. He noted he went to the site today and met with 161ih licant ie applicant's builder, noting that Councilmember Woodruff was at the site as well. He nocy�iecomn ils leaving the bituminous pavement of the existing driveway alone; it forms part of the cul tfe aq, t the end of Ridge Road. The concrete apron can be saw -cut and the gap w:. created can be filled in a landscape treatment that supports a vehicle. The existing driveway would be separated from the sheet and it would then be in compliance. Nielsen stated that earlier in the day the applicant had mentioned that the previous owner had indicated they had rebuilt the shed /deck about 15 years ago. That cast additional doubt as to whether the structure is a legal nonconforming use. He concurs with the Planning Commission's recommendation to give the applicant more time to prove the structure is a legal nonconforming use. Nielsen summarized his revised recommendation which allows the new house to be placed on the north side of the property, it allows the existing garage to remain where it is, and it requires the existing CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES July 26, 2010 Page 5 of 9 driveway be modified to comply with the City Code. He noted prior to the meeting he provided Council with a revised resolution granting the C.U.P. for consideration which is different than the resolution Council adopted on May 10, 2010. He then distributed copies of an email sent to the Mayor and Councilmembers today from the applicant's attorney. Mayor Lizee stated she would the like the C.U.P. to reflect the new house will be located on the north side of the property. Mayor Lizee noted that Mary Edwards (the applicant), Dan Meuisi (the (South Commissioner for Ridge Road) were in attendance this evening. Councilmember Woodruff stated he thought Mayor Lizee's sugge needs to be. Mayor Lizee stated as long as it is clear she is okay Turgeon thought further restrictions would confuse things. Mayor Lizee expressed her disappointment that Council wns prior to this meeting. She stated she was pleased that St$f and the solution which allowed the existing garage to re lace. existing 10 -foot driveway has to be separated from the street; hard Director Nielsen explained that City's Ordinance allows one d $ require a variance. Nielsen noted an effort Was made not to go tfie substructure that allows things to grow mszde'zifi gylinder shapes y e, s builder) and Jack Fess be more restrictive than it s written. Councilmember led with a °cgpy cant could co tit then expressed 4 is not an issue of the resolution kern that the the applicant. per property; to have two would ice route. He explained there is a vs vehicles to drive on it. Councilmember Turgeon asked if saw - cutting the cot ?clp. apron m *'existing driveway will cause issues with opening the door on the existing garage. Pheb16f Nielselni`explained the concrete seam is outside of the door and the door,rests on a slab. V- Councilmember Turgeoniit§ked if Nl ghed/deck could be relocated somewhere else on the property so it would be in comphaatce =erector 41sen stated he' bought it would be difficult to move it from a practical matter. There areplanps to 1pe4te a shed and cl eW noted the applicant proposes having a fair amount of deck as part of the Aicclttalr i& s Councilmq 'her Turgeort�ked if the Stairs were too close to the property line. Director Nielsen explained the Cit Ordinance allows and lilfs tq, croach into that area as long as they are not wider than four In response tbWoomment from, ouncilmember Turgeon, Mr. Meuisi explained a few broken steps will be replaced but flacfeJs no plan t4irebuild the steps. Mr. Meuisi thanked Dib t t TiNielsen for his efforts to work towards a good compromise. He also thanked Comncilmembers Turgeon' Woodruff for going out to the site. He thanked the South Commissioner for Ridge Road for attending the meeting. He noted the applicant has received a lot of support from abutting property owners. Mayor Lizee stated a Ridge Road project is always very interesting. It's a beautiful area but it has its challenges. She then stated she was pleased with the flexibility in locating the house on the north side of the property. She had been concerned about the topography and about the amount of fill that would have had to be brought in. Councilmember Turgeon commented she was also pleased with that. CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES July 26, 2010 Page 6 of 9 Councilmember Bailey stated that Director Nielsen had explained the shed had been rebuilt 15 years ago and the City did not issue a permit for that project. Bailey explained if the shed was rebuilt it would not be protected by the 2006 eminent domain statute. Nielsen stated 15 years ago such a project would have required a permit and a permit would not have been issued without a variance. Bailey stated therefore it's an illegal structure. Ms. Edwards stated she knew the shed existed in the 1930s. She can prove that but she needs additional time to get the City what it needs to solidify it was a legal building. Councilmember Bailey asked if the structure would be illegal if it existed m"tij 930s and was then torn down and rebuilt with a deck 15 years ago. Director Nielsen stated that i irrect if it was done without a permit. The City Ordinance that was in place as early as the mid 1980ast pd a nonconforming structure that was destroyed to 50 percent or more of its value it could not be,ptit back,= f; Ms. Edwards clarified the structure was not rebuilt. The and he did a patchwork repairjob to it. She thought it to Councilmember Bailey stated it's his understanding''tli Nielsen explained the assessor has indicated that the stn indicate the deck was rebuilt somewhat recently. Nielsen type of construction. Woodruff moved, Turgeon seconded, Ad Revising a Conditional Use Permit to Build`dp a`' Road, subject to the following conditions: 1)`` he with the front and side yar setback reguitf,. nonconforming garage neax ing Sheet may rem- existing garage must boEgcparatcd fj'pm the stree jM lake must be remove&*,, bin six am . iths, or upon comes first, unless the AIld and City Council that the 1956. To ensujiliaGnce ON ojn with the (:J#, providing ua a half ,tWtes the estimat' build Y3 g. 3O rmit plans for tl the site. ''l _494 passed 5/0. 9. There was nothing in a hardware store is green treated i lupiber. Director ril�eated. Bailey stated that would pretty new material relative to that 'I0N1 N ,(k 10 -038 "A Resolution Lot fgiMary Edwards, 6170 Ridge use plan will be adjusted to comply .?R -IA /S zoning districts; 2) The � The 10 -foot driveway serving the 4) The nonconforming shed and deck near the nuance of a certificate of occupancy, whichever 1pl 'i ie satisfaction of the Planning Commission llgal,norlcbnforming use, constructed prior to 2 August ig "'W; i " ' Applicant shall enter into an escrow agreement (cash escrow or letter of credit) in the amount of one and -ng the structure and restoring the site." and, 5) The tall include a tree preservation and reforestation plan for report. 10. GENERAL/NEW BUSINESS A. Water Brochure Mayor Liz& asked what action Council wants to take with regard to the revised water brochure. The options are approve it as presented, approve it with edits or don't approve it. Turgeon moved, Bailey seconded, approving the water brochure as presented. CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES July 26, 2010 Page 7 of 9 Councilmember Woodruff suggested that under the heading "If water is available to your home..." delete Item 1 "Great! Contact the city to find out how much you owe on your assessment, and make arrangements to pay." It did not make sense to him. He then suggested in Item 2 delete the word "around" from the phrase "the connection fee is around $10,000 ". After some clarification about the suggested changes there was consensus that the changes be made. Without objection from the maker or seconder of the motion, the motion was amended to include subject to the two proposed changes being made. Motion passed 5 /0. B. Dog License Administrator Heck stated the Councilmembers had received an concern about the City Ordinance requirement for dogs to recei dog license. The resident's issue is her dog has an allergic re Council wanted to consider an amendment to the existing' d4 resident to get a waiver from their veterinarian stati`whel received a note from Councilmember Zerby saying afi Y Y g E B�r3g4t 3 ,M commented that a few cities in the metro area have eliminated, do need to be tagged saying they have had a rabies vaeeind1A program was because of cost. He noted he had previously c provided him from the University of Mmnesot Vl ,yetcrinary Sel Councilmember Bailey commented that Bangui problem. Councilmember Zerby explained the throughout the country that have dealt with this. the City's existing Iangnagg I tsorid , inance. He Councilmember Zerh could harm the animal. the resident been vaccid &d. She`'6is way to limit the number could sign g waiver for the Bangorordim '0 contained a resident regarding their ation in order to obtain a i4ceination. He asked if ease ordmancd!that would allow a dog should not 'b vaccinated. He Allows for such an 0. 6ption. Heck &-for dogs to be lleenses; the dogs ie reason for stopping the licensing kited information Mayor Lizee had hopt rabies vaccinations. n't be the only�6ity that has encountered this esideni had, provided a list of about 14 cities ang dinance to be most compatible with rgor's�e'xt was a good fit. not license the dog if they thought the vaccine appropriate. IN a dog oWner*dald not know the dog would get a reaction until it's ) he - if the City quit licensing dogs then there would not be any -si&"�t ma have. She would not mind a change where if the dog had ad ar AI �gic reaction to the vaccination then a licensed veterinarian to notf'get another vaccination. Councilmember Zerby explained the Mayor Liz& stated there are 1 '© issues being discussed. One is if the City should be dealing with health issues (vaccination re4' ,,�hts) that belong to the Minnesota Board of Animal Health. The other is whether or not the City'' 'J&nsing ordinance should be amended. She explained she did some research on the rabies vaccination. Veterinarians have told her the reaction is to the solution the vaccine is suspended in which is injected into the animal. The pet's veterinarian can recommend the pet be vaccinated with a vaccine suspended in a different type of solution. The rabies vaccine is tested by something called a "Titer" testing. With this testing a blood sample is drawn from the pet by the veterinarian, tested and then sent to a national center in Kansas City, Kansas, to verify if there still are anti rabies antibodies in the dog's blood. That burden of proof lies on the pet owner. She expressed her hesitancy to say that if a dog has had an allergic reaction it doesn't need to be revaccinated. She stated she did not think any veterinarian would sign a waiver saying a dog did not have to be revaccinated. She suggested Council talk about the licensing issue. CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES July 26, 2010 Page 8 of 9 Councilmember Woodruff stated the individual who made the request has a couple of actions it would like Council to consider. He is only willing to consider the issue of rabies vaccinations. He explained that based on his research the federal government approves rabies vaccines. There are currently nine different types of rabies vaccines approved for dogs and they are manufactured by four different companies. He has not yet been able to verify if the different vaccines are in the same type of solution. The dog is allergic to the vector the vaccine is grown in and not the vaccine. He assumes that if there are nine different vaccines then there are probably different types of vectors. There is a high probability the dog would not be allergic to one type of vector. He commented he has a call into the Veterinary School to talk about the to list. He expressed his unwillingness to change the City's licensing ordinancc3AV t, Administrator Heck recapped his understanding of this discue Woodruff don't want to change the licensing program. Council rabies vaccinations before any action is taken. Mayor Liz €e stated she was not interested in staff re allergic to. She then stated she stands behind the la animals from rabies. She noted that between 1977 and Hennepin County. She again stated the burden of proof Councilmember Zerby stated if there is a gate law that this should be discussed further. Administrator Heck stated there is not much research that. 11. STAFF AND A. Administrator and Administrator Heck stated curbing as well', bite f a sewer and4 er is bein mreruarivp pemg consiaerea ss a pei installed iti'MAnor Park on Au i ii 14 ' 4i or Lizce and Councilmember liW" ditional information about types of soi&igns a dog may be the residents `a�� ,other domestic ,, een 72 test DositiW bies cases in rDer owner. City's ordinance then he thought in the'istite laws. He will continue to Park is almost done. The parking lot and ive "tofbd.e`ompleted. With regard to the shelter in Manor Park, week. The project coordinator is researching alternatives to a p_sc� of the fact that the slab will shift and move. One of the 15e pavers type solution. The boundless playground will be i group of volunteers. B. 11 q,or and City Council Mayor Liz6e stated tW',,y Use 9, 2010, work session from 6:00 P.M. — 7:00 P.M. will be devoted to discussions from Senatolien Olson and from South Lake Minnetonka Police Department Chief Litsey. Senator Olson will discttss questions about the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District. Chief Litsey will entertain questions about the SLMPD 2011 Operating Budget the Coordinating Committee has recommended. CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES July 26, 2010 Page 9 of 9 12. ADJOURN Zerby moved, Turgeon seconded, Adjourning the City Council Regular Meeting of July 26, 2010, at 8:07 P.M. Motion passed 5/0. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED Christine Freeman, Recorder ATTEST: Brian Heck, City Administrator /Clerk xi * j..� '3 ::. =. Is: E ke, Mayor Department Council Meeting Item Number Finance August 09, 2010 3A Item Description: 'Verified Claims From: Michelle Nguyen Brian Heck Background / Previous Action Claims for council authorization. The attached claims list includes checks numbered 50336 through 50401 totaling $513,532.68. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the claims list. 8/0.5/2010 1.2_56 PM A/P HISTORY COATS REPORT VENDOR SET: 01 City of Shored d BANK: 1 BEACON BANK DATE RANGE: 7/27/2010 THRU 99/99/9999 CHECK VENDOR I.D. NAME STATUS DATE 03051 SHIPS - FEDERAL W/H D 8/03/2010 00092 MN DEPT OF REVENUE D 8/03/2010 20005 WELLS FARGO HEALTH BENEFIT SVC D 8/03/2010 15885 MIDWEST MAILING SYSTEMS INC R 9/27/2010 00053 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST - 302131 -4 R 8/03/2010 16625 MINN BARBRA GROUP LIFE INS R 8/03/2010 00052 PENN R 8/03/2010 1 SIVERTS, GEORGE /MOLL R 8/09/2010 10576 ADVANCED IMAGING SOLUTIONS INC R 8/09/2010 00083 AFSCME CO 5 MEMBERS HEALTH FUN R 8/09/2010 36275 AMERICAN MESSAGING R 8/09/2010 1 BEST MANAGEMENT PRODUCTS R 8/09/2010 04500 CITY OF CHANHASSEN R 8/09/2010 ].8100 CITY OF MOUND R 8/09/2010 D5305 COMMUNITY REC RESOURCES R 8/09/2010 05875 CUB FOODS R 8/09/2010 07383 ELECTRICAL INSTALI.ATION & MAIN R 8/09/2010 29344 FA.STENAL COMPANY R 8/09/2010 19950 FERGUSON WATERWORKS R 8/09/2010 08712 G m K SERVICES R 8/09/2010 09400 GOPHER STATE ONE CALL R 8/09/2010 01900 HAWKINS, INC. R 8/09/2010 PAGE: INVOICE CHECK CHECK CHECK AMOUNT DISCOUNT NO STATUS AMOUNT 000000 1.1,138.16 000000 1,858.96 000000 1,035.660 050336 852.47 050337 1,433.55 050338 32.00 050339 6,047.90 050341 172.61 050342 140.43 050343 359.00 050344 17.97 050345 761.88 050346 4,023.29 050347 6,105.50 050348 4,193.54 050349 92.96 050350 200.50 050351 50.91 050352 766.68 050353 677.00 050354 236.65 050355 64.12 2 8/05/2010 12:56 PM A/P HISTORY CHECK REPORT VENDOR SET: 01 Ciiy of Shorewood HANK: 1 BEACON HANK DATE RANGE: 7/27/2010 CHAD 99/99/9999 CHECK VENDOR I.U. NAME STATUS DATE 29232 HECK, FRIES R 8/09/2010 1 HENRY HERRMANN R 8/09/2010 11072 I -STATE TRUCK CENTER R 8/09/2010 11510 S,P. COOKE CO R 8/09/2010 .. LANDSCAPE STRUCCLIES R 8/09/2010 1 MAACO COLLISON REPAIR R 8/09/2010 14467 MARTIN MARIETTA AGGREGATES R 8/09/2010 15050 MEDIACOM R 8/09/2010 00079 MEDICA R 8/09/2010 15176 MENARDS R 8/09/2010 15500 METRO COUNCIL ENVMT(WASTEWATER R 8/09/2010 29320 MIDWEST PLAYSCAPES, INC. R 8/09/2010 06645 YN DEPT_ OF LABOR & INDUSTRY R 8/09/2010 14050 MT' DISTRIBUTING COMPANY R 8/09/2010 19445 NGUYEN, MICHELLE R 8/09/2010 19750 NORTHERN TOOL & EQUIP CO R 8/09/2010 19967 NORTHWEST ASPHALT, INC. R 5/09/2010 1.5900 OFFICE DEPOT R 8/09/2010 29332 ON SITE SANITATION INC R 8/09/2010 15000 PAETEC R 8/09/2010 29343 PETE SEAMANS CONSTRUCTION R 0/09/2010 20950 POTTS, KENNETH N. R 8/09/2010 PAGE INVOICE CHECK CHECK CHECK AMOUNT DISCOUNT NO STATUS AMOUNT 050356 148.49 050357 20.00 050358 20.00 050359 69.91 050360 1,315.79 050361 1,377.21 050362 27,762.27 050363 4 050364 14,415.80 050365 213.41 050366 47,027.65 050367 5,626.58 050368 1,294.97 050369 20,528.66 050370 81.00 050371 iiL49 050372 36,905.50 050373 82.21 050374 728.92 050375 527.31 050376 16,491.00 050377 2,291.66 3 8/05/2010 12:56 PM A/P HISTORY CHECK REPORT PAGE: 4 VENDOR SET: 01 City of Shorewood BANK: 1. BEACON BANK DATE RANGE: 9 /27/2010 TP.RU 99/99/9999 CHECK INVOICE CHECK CHECK CHECK VENDOR S.D. NAME STATUS DATE AMOUNT DISCOUNT NO STATUS AMOUNT 29251 PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL GROUP R 8/09/2010 050378 765.68 26100 QWEST R 8/09/2010 050379 309.32 29342 SAGA HILL EVENTS R 8/09/2010 050380 175.00 22980 SIGN LLC R 8/09/2010 050381 80.16 23500 SO LK M.TKA POLICE DEPT R 8/09/2010 050382 78,829.00 23725 SPEEDWAY SUPERAMERICA LLC R 8/09/2010 050383 2,887.30 29101 SUN NEWSPAPERS R 8/09/2010 050384 25.03 17200 SUN PATRIOT NEWSPAPERS R 8/09/2010 050385 18.38 23738 T- MOBILE R 8/09/20'_0 050386 33.07 25000 TOTAL PRINTING SERVICES R 8/09/2010 050387 1,090.89 25452 TWIN CITY WATER CLINIC R 8/09/2010 050388 100.00 00085 CRUM LLIE INSURANCE CO R 8/09/2010 050389 1,235.20 25550 UPS R 8/09/2010 050390 16.25 29135 VALLEY -RICH CO., INC. R 8/09/2010 050391 5,297.52 )0200 VERIZON WIRELESS R 8/09/2010 050392 213.27 83900 WASTE MANAGEMENT -TC WEST R 8/09/2010 050393 499.12 27580 WESTONKA SEWER & WATER R 8/09/2010 050394 5,554.55 18500 WK. MUELLER & SONS, INC. R 8/09/2010 050395 119,485.44 28350 WOODRUPE, RICHARD R 8/09/201.0 050396 32.00 28451 WES AND ASSOCIA'IEES R 8/09/2010 050397 19,269.00 19800 XCEL ENERGY R 8/09/2010 050399 11,857.96 28900 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE R 8/09/2010 050401 223.57 8/05/2010 12:56 PM A/P HISTORY CHECK REPORT PAGE: 5 VENDOR SET: 01 City of Shorewood BANK: 1 BEACON BANK DATE RANGE: '1/27/2010 THRU 99/99/9999 VENDOR T.D. NAME CHECK STATUS DATE ** T O T A L S ** NO REGULAR CHECKS: 63 HAND CHECKS: 0 DRAFTS: 3 EFT: 0 NON CHECKS: 0 VOID CHECKS: 0 VOID DEBITS VOID CREDITS' TOTAL ERRORS: 0 VENDOR SET: 01 DANK: 1 TOTALS: 66 BANK: 1 TOTALS: 66 REPORT TOTALA: 69 0.00 0.00 INVOICE CHECK CHECK CHECK AMOUNT DISCOUNT NO STATUS AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT DISCOUNTS TOTAL APPLIED 451,412.85 0.00 45 465,445.57 0.00 0.00 0.00 14,032.72 0.00 14,032.92 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 465,445.57 0.00 465,445.5`) 465,445.59 0.00 465,445.57 465,445.57 0.00 465,445.59 08 -05 -2010 12:53 AM C G U N C I L REPORT BY VENDOR. - AUGY 09, 2010 PAGE: i Parks 5 Recreation 1,485.00 VENDO S ORT KEY DATE DESC RIPTION F UND DE PARTME NT. AMOUNT Senior Community Cents 165.95 8/09/10 INS QTR SSCC COMMICSION Southshore Communi ADVANCED :IMAGING SOLUTIONS INC 8/09/10 SAINT 06/15 - 07/15 General Fund Municipal Buildings ..40.43 TOTAL: 4,193.54 TOTAL: 140.43 ELECTION FOODS AFSCME CO 5 MEMBERS HEALTH FUND 8/09/10 AUG UNION DENTAL TREE General. Fund Unallocated Expenses 359.00 8/09/10 CH & ELE=ON General Fund Elections TOTAL: 359.00 AMERICAN MESSAGING 8/09/10 AUG PAGER General. Fund Public Works 8.99 8 /09/10 AUG PAGER Water Utility Water 4.49 22.47 8/09/10 AUG PAGER Sanitary Sewer Uti Sewer 4.49 TOTAL: 92.96 EFTPS - FEDERAL W/H 8/03/10 TOTAL: 19.99 Fund CITY OF CHANHASSEN CITY OF MOUND 8/09/10 018505 -000 ACCT SVC ADDRES Water Utility 8/09/10 018505 -001 ACCT SVC ADORES Water Utility 8/09/10 3RD QTR PAYMENT General Fund Water Water TOTAL .ire PrItletiln TOTAL: 96.90 946.39 4,023.29 6,1.05.50 6,105.50 COMMUNITY REC RESOURCES 8/09/10 PCS - 09/26 -08/06 General Fund Parks 5 Recreation 1,485.00 8/09/10 SSCC ASSISTANT 07/26- 0'1/29 Southshore Common- Senior Community Cents 165.95 8/09/10 INS QTR SSCC COMMICSION Southshore Communi Senior Community Cent.e 2,542.99 TOTAL: 4,193.54 CUB FOODS 8/09/10 ELECTION FOODS General Fund Elections 46.98 8/09/10 CH & ELE=ON General Fund Elections 11.54 810911. ELECTION General Fund Elections 11.97 8/09/10 C.H & ELECTION General Fund Municipal Bu'1d'ng. 22.47 TOTAL: 92.96 EFTPS - FEDERAL W/H 8/03/10 FEDERAL WIN General Fund NOW DEPARTMENTAL 4,107.24 8/03/10 FICA W/H General Fund NON- DEPARTMENTAL 2,849.14 8/03/10 MEDICARE W/H General Fund NON- DEPARTMENTAL 666.32 8/03/10 FICA W/H General Fund Administration 246.13 8/03/10 MEDICARE W/H General Fund Adminis tration 57.56 8/03/10 FICA W/H General Fund General Government 267.51 8/03/10 MEDICARE W/H General Fund General Government 62.56 8/03/10 FICA W/H General Fund Elections 150.22 8/03/10 MEDICARE W/H Genera;. Punk Election. 35.14 8/03/10 FICA W/H General Fund Finance 73.83 8 /03/10 MEDICARE W/H General Fund Finance 17.29 8/03/10 FICA W/H General Fund Planning 286.99 8/03/10 MEDICARE W/H General Fund Planning 67.12 8/03/10 FICA W/H General Fund Protective Inspection; 189.14 8/03/1.0 MEDICARE W/H General Fund Protective Inspections 44.23 8/03/10 FICAA W/H General Fund City Engineer 186.92 8/03/10 MEDICARE W/H General Fund City Engineer 43.71 8/03/10 FICA W/H General Fund Public Works 644.67 8/03/1.0 MEDICARE W/H General Fund Public Work. 150.98 8/03/10 FICA W/H General Fund Streets & Roadways 219.04 8/03/10 MEDICARE W/H General Fund St,eetG & Roadways 51.22 8/03/10 FICA W/H General Fund 'free Maintenance 26.93 8/03/10 MEDICARE W/H General Fund Tree Maintenance 6.30 8/03/10 FICA W/H General Fund Parks & Recreation 190.85 8/03/10 MEDICARE W/H General Fund Parks & Recreation 44.64 8/03/10 FICA W/H Southshore Coomaxi Senior Community Cents 35.09 8/03/10 MEDICARE W/H Southshore Communi Senior Community Cente 8.20 08 -OS -2010 12:53 AM C 0 E N C 1 L REPORT BY VENDOR - AUGY 09, 2010 PAGE: 2 VENDOR SORT KEY DATE DESCRIPTION FUND DE PARTMEN T AM OUNT 8/03/10 FICA W/H Water Utility Water 160.19 8/03/10 MEDICARE W/H Water Utility Water 37.46 8 /03/10 FICA W/H Sanitary Sewer Uti Sewer 136.67 8/03/110 MEDICARE W/H Sanitary Sewer Uti Sewer 31.96 8/03/10 FICA WIN Recycling Utility Recycling 7.73 8/03/10 MEDICARE W/H Recycling Utility Recycling 1.61 8/03/10 FICA W/H Stormwater Managem STORMWATER MANAGEMENT 27.25 8 /03/10 MEDICARE W/H Stormwater Managem STORMNATER MANAGEMENT 6.36 TOTAL: 11,138.16 ELECTRICAL INSTALLATION & MAINTENANCE 8/09/10 SIGNAL REPAIR a IRAN 1.9 LE' General Fund Traffic Control /Sts Li 200.50 TOTAL: 200.50 FASTENAL COMPANY 8/09/10 SILVER PARK SHELTER RETURN Park Capital Impre Park Capital Improveme 40.52- 8/09/10 SILVER PARK SHELTER Park Capital Impro Park Capital Improveme 91.43 TOTAL: 50.91 FERGUSON WATERWORKS 8/09/10 WATER METER PART Water Utility Water 32.45 8/09/1.0 WATER METER Water Utility Water 117.48 8/09/10 WATER METER Wa*_er Utility Water 616.75 'TOTAL: 766.68 G & K SERVICES 8/09/10 CH SVC General Fund Municipal Eui'_d;ngs 105.50 8/09/10 PW SVC General Fund Public Works 724.26 8/09/10 SSCC SVC Southshore Communi. Senior Community Cents 47.24 TOTAL: 877.00 GOPHER STATE ONE CALL, 8 /09/10 JULY SVC Water Utility Water 118.32 8/09/10 Jury SVC Sanitary Sewer Uti sewer 118133 TOTAL: 236.65 HAWKIINS, INC. 8/09/10 CHEMICAL H2O Water Utility Water 64.12 TOTAL: 64.12 HECK, 6RLAN 8/09/10 CELL General Fund Administration 79.99 8/09/10 MILEAGE General Find Administration 68.50 TOTAL: 148.49 - -STATE TRUCK CENTER 8/09/10 TRANSIT TAX NEW DUMP TRUCK Equipment Replacem Equipment Replacement 20.00 TOTAL: 20.00 I C1MA RETIREMENT TRUST - 302131 -457 8/03/10 P/R DEDUCTS- DEFERRED COM General Fund NON DEPARTMENTAL 1,100.00 8/03/10 P/R DEDUCTS - DEFERRED COM General Fund NON DEPARTMENTAL 333 55 'IOTA;.: 1,433.55 S.P. COOKE CO 8/09/10 2011 . DOG TAGS General Fund C,ereral Government 69.91 TOTAL: 69.91 MARTIN MARIETTA AGGREGATES 8/09/10 SEALCOAT -NOTI) CIP Street Capital Imp Street Capt improvemen _29 TOTAL: 29,762.27 MEDIACO,g 8/09/10 SSCC -07/16 -08/15 SVC Southshore Commuri Senior Community Cente 4 7. 95 TOTAL: 47.95 MEDICA 8/09/10 JUNE -BRUCE STARK General Fund Unallocated Expenses 1,150.27 8/09/10 AEG MEDICAL PREY General Fund Unallocated Expenses 13,265.53 08 -05 -2010 12:53 AM C 0 U N C I L REPORT BY VENDOR - AUGY 09, 2010 PAGE: 3 V ENDOR SORT KEY DAT DE FORD DEPARTMEN AMOUNT TOTAL: 14,415.80 MENARDS 8/09/10 HOCKY RINK BOARD Genera]. Fund Parks & Recreation ___......_. . 213.41 'DOTAL: 213.41 METRO COUNCIL EBIMT(WASTRWATER) 8/09/10 AUG WASTEWATER SVC Sanitary Sewer Uti Sewer 49,029.65 TC'I'AL: 49,027.65 MIDWEST MAILING SYSTEMS INC 9/29/10 AUG NEWSLETTER POSTAGE /SVC General Fund General Government 510.15 7/27/10 AUG NEWSLETTER POSTAGE /SVC General Fund Cenral Government 342.32 TOTAL: 852.49 MIDWEST PLAYSCAPE.S, INC. 8/09/10 SILVERWOOD PARK SHELTER Park Capital impro Park Capital Improveme 5,626.58 TOTAL: 5,626.58 MISC. VENDOR BEST MANAGEMENT PRODUC 8/09/10 DRAINAGE^, STRUCTURE- INVM529 Stcrmwater Managem ST0RMWATER MANAGEMENT 761.89 HENRY WEHRMANN 8/09/10 KURT & KART WEHRMANN -SAFET General Fund NON- DEPARTMENTAL 20.00 LANDSCAPE STRUCTURES 8/09/10 MANOR /FREEMAN PARK - INV'AM9 General Fund Parks & Recreation 1,31.5.79 MAACO COLLISON REPAIR 8/09/10 2004FORD -3250 DAMAGED General Fund Public Works 1,377.21 SIVERTS, GEORGE /MOLL, 8/09/10 03- 750204 -00 Water Utility NON DEPARTMENTAL 172.61 TOTAL: 3,649.49 NN DEPT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY 8/09/10 2ND QTR -2010 STATE SURCHRG General Fund NON- DEPARTMENTA1. 5,294.97 TOTAL: 1,274.97 MN DEPT OF REVENUE 8/03/10 STATE W/H General Fund NON JEPARTMEN'PAL 1,858.9( TOTAL: 1,858.96 RINN PAPERS GROUP LIFE INS 8/03/10 MONTHLY- ELECT LIFE INS General Fund NON - DEPARTMENTAL 32.00 TOTAL: 32.00 MTI DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 8/09/10 MOWER CIA EQPMT Equipment Replacem Equipment Rep'_acement 20,528.66 TOTAL: 20,528.66 NGUYEN, MICHELLE 8/09/10 JULY MILEAGE General Fund F'O'LIE 81.00 TOTAL: 81.00 NORTHERN TOOL & EQUIP CO 8/09/10 LOAD BINDERS General Fund Public Works 111.49 TOTAL: 111.49 NORTHWEST .ASPHALT, INC. 8/09/10 P.V,45 HARDING LN /AVE REEA Street Capital Iaip Street Cap' Improvemen 36,905.50 TOTAL: 3',905-50 OFFICE DEPOT 8/09/10 GEN SUPPLIES General Fund General Government 64.76 8/09/10 ELECTION 'SUPPLIES General Fund Elections 5.00 8/09/1.0 ELECTION General Pund Elections 12.45 TOTAL: 82.21 ON SITE SANITATION INC 8/09/10 BADGER PARK General Fund Parks & Recreation 45.96 8/09/10 CATHCART PARK General Fund Parks & He m ati.on 45.96 8/09/10 FREEMAN PARK General Fund Parks & Recreation 266.13 8/09/10 MANOR PARK General Fund Parks & Recreation 45.96 8/09/10 SILVERWOOD PARK General Fund Parke & Recreation 45.96 8/09/10 SOUTH SHORE SKATE General Fund Parks & Recreation 45.96 8/09/10 CHRISTMAS LAKE. BOAT ACCESS General Fund Parks & Recreation 187.03 8/09/10 BIRCH SLUFF ROAD General Fund narks & Recreation 45.96 08 -05 -2010 12:53 .AM C 0 U N C I L REPORT BY VENDOR - AUGY D9, 2010 PAGE: 4 V ENDOR SO RT K EY DATE DESCRIPTION FIN D EPARTMENT AMOUNT TOTAL: 728.92 PAETEC 8/09/10 02/26 -03/25 SVC General Fund Municipal Buildings 135.86 8/09/10 02/26 -03/25 SVC General Fund Public Works 1 6.90 8/09/10 02/26 -03/25 SVC General Fund Parks & Recreation 145.60 8/09/10 02/26 -03/25 SVC Water Utility Waver 98.70 8/09/10 02/26 -03/25 SVC Water Utility Water. 100 25 TOTAL: 527.31 PERA 8/03/10 P/R DEDUCTS -PERA OFRera1 Fund NON - DEPARTMENTAL 2, 191.36 8/03/10 P/R DEDUCTS -PERA General Fnnd Administration 289.12 8/03/10 P/C DEDUCTS -PERA General Fund General Government 302.04 8/03/10 P/R DEDUCTS -PERA General Fund Elections 169.60 8/03/10 P/R DEDUCTS -PERA General Fund Finance 83.36 8/03/10 P/R DEDUCTS -PERA General Fund Planning 369.85 8/03/10 P/R DEDUCTS -PERA General Fund Protective Inspections 245.05 6/03/10 P/R DEDUCTS -PERA General Fund City Engineer 211,74 8/03/10 P/R DEDUCTS -PERA General Fund Public Works ')55.12 8/03/10 P/£ DEDUCTS -PERA General Fund Streets & Roadways 253.96 8/03/10 P/R DEDUCTS -PERA Generai Fund Tree Maintenance 30.39 8/03/10 P/R DEDUCTS -PERA General Fund Parks & Recreation 121.77 8/03/10 P/R DEDUCTS -PERA Southshore Communi Senior Community Cente 39.58 8/03/10 P/R DEDUCTS PEAK Water Utility Water 1.88.04 8/03/10 P/R DEDUCTS -PERA Sanitary Sewer Uti Sewer 157.43 8/03/10 P/R DEDUCTS -PERA Recycling Utility Recycling 8.73 8/03/10 P/R DEDUC'TS -PERA Stormeater Managed STORN:WATER MANAGEMENT 30.96 TOTAL: 6,047.90 PETE SHAMANS CONSTRUCTION 0/09/10 REMODEL OP MANOR PARK Park Capital Impro Park Capital Improveme 15,571.00 8/09/10 BUILD PINIC SHELTER ;aSILVE Park Capital topic Park. Capital `_mproveme 920.00 TOTAL: 16,491.00 POTTS, KENNETH N. 8/09/10 JULY PROSECUTIONS General Fund Professional Svcs 2,291..66 'DOTAL: 2,291_66 PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL GROUP 8/09/10 AUG DENTAL PREM General Fund Unalloua led Expenses 765.68 TOTAL: 765.68 QWEST 0/09/10 07/25 -08/24 General Fund Municipal Buildings 120.61 8/09/10 D7/25 -08/24 General Fund Public Works 56.89 8/09/10 07/25 -08/24 Water Utility Water 65.65 8/09/10 07/25 -08/24 Water Utility Water 66.17 TOTAL: 309.32 SAGA HILL EVENTS 6/09/10 SSCC - C5 /01/10 EVENT -GEN Southshore Communi Senior Community Cente 175.00 TOTAL: i`Y5.00 SIGN LLC 8/09/10 LOGO 478 General Fund Public Works 80.i6 TOTAL: 80.16 SO LK MTKA POLICE DEPT 8/09/10 AUG OPERATING BUDGET EXP General Fund Police Protection - - - - -- 788 TOTAL. 98,829.00 SPEEDWAY SUPERAMERICA LLC 8/09/10 GAS General Fund Public Works 2,887.30 TOTAL: 2,887.30 08 -OS -2010 12:53 AM C O U N C I L REPORT BY VENDOR - AUGY 09, 2010 PAGE: 5 VENDOR SORT KEY DAT D FUND DEPART AMOUNT SUN NEWSPAPERS 8/09/10 ACCURACY TEST 07/29 General Brad E'iections 25.03 TOTAL: 25.03 SUN PATRIOT NEWSPAPERS 8/09/10 ACCURACY 'TEST 09/24 General Fund Elections 18.38 TOTAL: 18.38 T- MOBILE 8/09/10 JOE P.- SVC 06/21 -07/20 General Fund P oteotive £nspections 33.09 TOTAL: 33.07 TOTAL PRINTHIG SERVICES 6/09/10 AUG NEWSLETTER SVC General Fund General Government 1,090.89 TOTAL: 1,090.89 T'W'IN CITY WATER CLINIC 8/09/10 AUG BACTERIA ANALYSIS Water Utility Water 100.00 TOTAL: 100.00 UNUM LIFE INSURANCE CO 8/09/10 AUG LIFE INS oREM General Fund Unallocated Expenses 1,235.20 TOTAL: 1 ,235.20 UPS 8/09/10 RETURN PHONES General Fund General Government 16.25 TOTAL: 16.25 VALLEY -RICH CO., INC. 8 /09/10 SEWER REPAIR A BIRCH BLUFF Sanitary Sewer Uti Sewer _5 52 TOTAL: 5,297.52 VERIZON WIRELESS 8/09/10 L.S. SVC 06/22 -07/21 Sanitary Sewer Uti Sewer 213.27 '0' AT 213.27 WASTE MANAGEMEN'L -TO WEST 8/09/10 P.W. AUG SVC General Fund Public Works 339.61 8/09/10 SSCC -AUG SVC .SOUthshare Communi Senior Community Cents TOTAL: 499.72 WELLS FARGO HEALTH BENEFIT SVCS 8/03/10 P/R DEDUCTS -HSA General Fund NON DEPARTMENTAL 939.60 8/03/10 P/R DEDUCTS-BSA General Fund General Government 96.00 TOTAL: 1,035.60 WESTONKA SEWER 4 WATER 8/09/10 MANOR RD- INSTALL SW & WE Park Capital Impro Park Capital Improveme 4 8/09/10 SW EXPLORATION BIRCH BLUFF Sanitary Sewer Uta Sewer !,054.55 TOTAL: 5,55¢.55 WM. MUELLER k SONS, INC. 8/09/10 BLACKTOP General Fund Streets w Roadways 15,37206 8/09/10 P.V.42 - PROJECT NO. 10 01 Street Capital Imp Street Capt Improvemen 104,106.38 TOTAL: 119,485.44 WOODRUFF, RICHARD 8/09/10 MILEAGE TO METRO CITIES General Fund Cotimcil 32.00 TOTAL: 32.00 WSB AND ASSOCIATES 8/09/10 JUNE SMITHTOWN L'S REHAB Street_ Capital Imp Street Cart Improvemen 3,718.50 8/09/ JUNE HARDING LN /AVE REHAB Street Capital Imp Street CnUi Improvemen 709.50 8/09/10 LYLE NIELSON DR Street Capital - up Street Cant Improvemen 4,512.00 8/09/10 JUN MEADOWVIEW NEIGHBORHOO Street Capital 1 m Street Capt Improvemen 6,816.00 8/09/10 JUNE 2010 BITUMINOUS MILL Street Capital Imp Street Capt Inn rovemen 192.00 8/09/10 ,LINE GIS 5 CAD SUPPORT Water Utility Water 1,300.50 8 /09 /10 JUN WATERFORD POND AT SW R Stormwater Managem STORMWATER MANAGEMENT 1,960.50 TOTAL: 19,209.00 XCEL ENERGY 8/09/10 STM14246844605 - 5/28 -09/1 General Fund Municipal Buildings 450.31. 08 -05 -2010 12:53 AM C 0 U N C I L REPORT BY VENDOR - AUCY 09, 2010 PAGE: 6 VENDOR SO KEY DATE DESCR FU ND DEPART AM OUNT 8/09/10 STMT4246844805 - 5/28 -07/1 General Fund Police Protection 3.6> 8/09/10 STMT 4246844805 - 5/28 -07/1 General Mute Public Works 368.54 8/09/10 STMT 4246844805 - 5/28 -07/1 General Fund Traffic Control /StY Li 26.68 8/09/10 STMTi246844805 - 5/28 -09/1 General Fund Traffic Control /Str Li 3,029.37 8/09/10 5700 CTY RD 19 General Fund Traffic Control /Str Li 33.93 B/09/10 5700 CTY RD 19 UNIT LIGHTS General Fond T,af:fic Control /Str Li 139.43 8/09/10 STM- 0246844805 - 5/28 -07/1 General Fund Parke & Recreation 416.17 8/09/10 SSCC- 06/22 -07/24 Southshore Communi Senior Community Serra 758.21 8/09/10 24253 SMTWN RD - 06/22 -07/2 Water Utility Water 1,210.79 8 /09 /10 STMT44246644805 - 5/28 -07 /1 Water Utility Eat, 975.15 8/09/10 STMT4246844805 - 5/28 -07/1 Water Utility Water 1,386.57 8/09/10 STMT9246844805 - 5/28 -07/1 Water Utility Water 2,534.01 8/09/10 STMT$246844805 - 5/28 -07/1 Sanitary Sewer Uti Sewer 525.93 TOTAL: 11,859.76 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE 8/09/10 FIRST ADI SUPPLIES General Fund Public Works 223.57 TOTAL. 223.57 ­PAYROLL EXPENSES 8/02/2010 - 99/99/9999 General Fund Administration 4,130.33 General Mand General Government 4,314.72 General Fund Elect ion0 2,422.96 General Fund Finance 1,190 85 General Fund p1wuning 5,283.54 General Fund Protective Inspections 3,500.98 General Fund J'iRy Engineer 3,024.80 General Fund Public Works 10,955.76 General Fund Streets & Roadways 3,62281 General Fund Tree Maintenance 43 General Fund Parks & Recreation 3,136.20 Southshore Conmuni Senior Community CeSte 565.50 Water Utility Water 2,686.08 Sanitary Sewer Uti Sewer 2,249.06 Recycling Utility Recycling 124.70 Stormeater Managem SSORMWA:'SR MANAGEMENT 439.64 TOTAL: 48,087.11 08- 05 -2Ci0 12:53 AM C O U N C I L REPORT BY VENDOR - AUGY 09, 20:0 PAGE: 7 VENDOR SORT REP DATE DESCRIPTION FUN DEPARTMENT AMOJNf' --------- - - - - -- NEED TOTALS ---------------- General 101 General Fund 200,820.69 402 Park Capital Improvements 26,668.49 433 Egnipment Replacement 20,548.66 404 Street Capital Improvemer. 1.84,72 9.90 Southshore Community Ctr. 4,525.40 601 Water Utility 16,059,u 611 Sanitary Sewer Utility 56,816.86 621 Recycling Utility 142.97 631 Stormwater ManagemenIITil 3,226.39 GRAND 'TOTAL: 513,532.68 TOTAL, PAGES: 7 08 -OS -2010 1.2:54 AM C 0 U N C I L REPORT BY DEPARTMENT - AUGY 09, 2010 PAGE: 1 246.13 DEPARTMENT FUND VENDOR N AME DATE DE SCRIPTION AMO MEDICARE SIR 57.56 PERA 8/03/10 NON-DEPARTMENTAL GERCraS. Fund EFTPS - FEDERAL W/H 8/03/10 FEDERAL AIR 4,107,24 HECK, BRIAN 8/09/10 CELL 8/03/10 FICA W/R 2,849.14 8/09/10 8/03/10 MEDICARE W/H 666.32 PERA 8/03/10 P/R DEDUCTS -PERA 2,791.36 ICNA RETIREMENT TRUST - 302131 -457 8/03/10 P/R DEDUCTS DEFERRED TOM 1,100.00 4,891.63 Cene ral Government 8/03/10 P/R DEDUCTS DEFERRED COM 333.55 FICA KID 267,51 MN DEPT OF REVENUE 8 /03/10 STATE W/H 1,858.96 8/03/10 MEDICARE W/H MIS DEPT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY 8/09/10 2ND QTR -2010 STATE SURCHRG 1,274.97 PERA 8/03/10 MISC. VENDOR HENRY WEHRMANN 8/09/10 KURT & KARI WEHRMANN- SAFE'T 20.00 S.P. COOKE CO MINE OTTERS GROUP LIFE INS 8/03/10 MONTHLY- ELECT LIFE INS 32.00 WELLS FARGO HEALTH BENEFIT SVCS 8/03/10 P/R DEDUCTS NSA 939. 60 TOTAL: 15,993.144 342.32 Council General Fund WOODRUFF, RICHARD 8/09/10 MILEAGE TO METRO CITIES 32.00 TOTAL: 32.00 .Administration General Pend EFTPS - FEDERAL W/H 8/03/10 FICA W/H 246.13 8/03/10 MEDICARE SIR 57.56 PERA 8/03/10 P/R DEDUCTS -PERA 289.12 HECK, BRIAN 8/09/10 CELL 79.99 8/09/10 MILEAGE 68.50 -PAYROLL EXPENSES 8/02/2010 - 99/99/9999 4,130.33 TOTAL: 4,891.63 Cene ral Government GEn,a:L Fund EFTPS - FEDERAL W/H 8/03/10 FICA KID 267,51 8/03/10 MEDICARE W/H 62.56 PERA 8/03/10 P/R DEDUCTS -PERA 302.04 S.P. COOKE CO 8/09/10 2011 DOG TAGS 69.91 MIDWEST MAILING SYSTEMS INC 7/27/10 AUG NEWSLETTER POSTAGE /SVC 51.0.15 7/29/10 AUG NEWSLETTER POSTAGE /SVC 342.32 OFFICE DEPOT 8/09/10 GEN SUPPLIES 64 -76 WELLS FARGO HEALTH BENEFIT SVCS 8/03/10 P/R DEDUCTS -HSA 96.00 TOTAL. PRINTING SERVICES 8/09/10 AUG NEWSLETTER SVC 1,090.89 UPS 8/09/10 RETURN PHONES 16.25 - PAYROLL EXPENSES 8/02/2010 - 99/99/9999 4,314.72 TOTAL: 7,137.11 Elections General Fund EFTPS - FEDERAL W/H 6 /03/10 FICA W/H 150.22 8/03/10 MEDICARE W /II 35.14 PERA 8/03/10 P/R DEDUCTS -PERA 169.60 CUB FOODS 8/09/10 ELECTION FOODS 46.98 8/09/10 C.H & ELECTION 11.554 8/09/10 ELECTION 11.97 OFFICE DEPOT 8/09/10 ELECTION SUPPLIES 5.00 8/09/IO ELECTION 12.45 SUN PATRIOT NEWSPAPERS 8/09/10 ACCURACY TEST 07/24 18.38 SON NEWSPAPERS 8 /09/10 ACCURACY 'PEST 07/29 25.03 - PAYROLL EXPENSES 8/02/2010 - 99/99/9999 2,422.96 TOTAL: 2,909.27 Finance General Fund EFTPS - FEDERAL W/H 8/03/10 FICA W/H 93.83 8/03/10 MEDICARE W/H 17.27 PERA 8/03/10 P/R DEDUCTS PERA 83.36 NGUYEN, MICHELLE 8/09/10 JULY MILEAGE 81.00 08 -05 -2010 12:54 AM Rrofessi.onal Svcs General Fund Planning General Fond Mun , Iipal buildings General Ford Police Protection General Fund Fire Protection General. Fund Protective Inspections General Fund City Engineer Genera! Fund Public Works General Fund C O U N C I L REPORT BY DEPARTMENT - AUGY 09, 2010 PAGE: 2 V ENDOR NAME DA TE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT — PAYROLL EXPENSES 8/02/2010 - 99/99/9999 1,190.85 TOTAL: 1,446.31 POT'TS, KENNETH N. 8/09/10 JULY PROSECUTIONS 2,291.66 TOTAL: 2,291.66 EFTPS - FEDERAL W/H 8/03/_0 FICA W/H 286.99 8/03/10 MEDICARE W /F: 69.1.2 PERA 8/03/10 P/R DEDUCTS -PERA 369.85 * *PAYROLL EXPENSES 8/02/2010 - 99/99/9999 5,283.54 TOTAL: 6,007.50 CUB FOODS 8/C9/10 C.H & ELECTION 22.49 G & K SERVICES 8/09/10 CA SVC 105.50 ADVANCED IMAGING SOLUTIONS INC 8/09/10 MAINT 06/15 -07/15 14G.43 PASTEL 8/09/10 02/26 -03/25 SVC 135.86 XCEL ENERGY_ 8/09/10 S°MT4246844805 - 5/28 -07/1 450.31 QWEST 8/09/10 07/25 -06/24 120.61 TOTAL: 975.18 XCEL ENERGY 8/09/1.0 STMT'k246844805 - 5/28 -07/1 3.67 SO LK MTKA POLICE DEPT 8 /09/10 AUG OPERATING BUT EXP 78,829.00 TOTAL: 78,832.67 CITY OF MOUND 8/09/'' -0 3RD QTR PAYMENT 6,105.50 TOTAL- 6,105.50 EFTPS - FEDERAL W/H 8/03/10 FICA W/E 189.14 8/03/10 MEDICARE WIG 44.23 PENA 8/03/10 P/R DEDUCTS -PERA 245.05 T- -MOBILE 8/09/10 DOE P.- SVC O6/21 -07/20 33.09 * *PAYROLL EXPENSES 8/02/2010 - 99/99/9999 3,500.98 TOTAL: 4,012.47 EFTPS - FEDERAL W/H 8/03/10 FICA W/H 186.92 8/03/10 MEDICARE W/H 43.71 PERA 8/03/10 P/R DEDUCTS -PERA 211.74 * *PAYROLL EXPENSES 8/02/2010 - 99/99/9999 3,024.80 TOTAL: 3,467.17 BETTE - FEDERAL WIG 8/03/10 FICA W/H 644.67 8/03/10 MEDICARE W/b 150.78 PERA 8 /03/10 P/R DE'DUC'TS -PERA 955.12 G & K SERVICES 8/09/10 P'N SVC 724.26 MISC. VENDOR MAACO COLLISON REPAIR 8/09/10 2004FORD -F250 DAMAGED 1,377.21. PAETEC 8 /09/10 02/26 -03/25 SVC 46.90 AMERICAN MESSAGING 8/09/1, AUG PAGER 8.99 NORTHERN TOOL & EQU:[P CO 8/09/10 LOAD BINDERS 111.49 XCEL ENERGY 8/09/i0 6T_MT8246844805 - 5/28 -07/1 368.54 SIGN LLC 8/09/10 LOGO 478 80.16 SPEEDWAY SUPERAMERICA LLC 8/09/10 GAS 2,887.30 QWEST 8/09/10 07/25 -08/24 56.89 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE 8/09/10 FIRST AD]'. SUPPLIES 223.57 WASTE MANAGEMENT -TC WEST 8/09/10 P.W. AUG SVC 339.61 O8 -05 -2010 12:54 AM C O U N C I L REPORT BY DEPARTMENT - AUGY 09, 2010 PAGE: 3 VENDOR NAME ' -PAYROLL. EXPENSES 8/02/2010 - 99/99/9999 10,955.96 TOTAL: 18,931.25 Streets & Roadways General Fund DRIPS - FEDERAL W/H 8/03/10 FICA W/E 219.04 8/03/10 MEDICARE W/H 51.22 PERA 8/03/10 P/R DEDUCTS -PERA 253.96 WK. MUELLER & SONS, INC. 8/09/10 BLACKTOP 15,377.06 - PAYROLL EXPENSES 8/02/2010 - 99/99/9999 3,627.81 TOTAL: 19,529.09 Traffic Control /Str Li General Fund ELECTRICAL INSTALLATION & MAINTENANCE 8/09/10 SIGNAL RELAMP O CSAH 19 LE 200.50 XCEL ENERGY 8/09/10 STMT 4246844805 - 5/28 -09/1 25.68 B/09/10 STMT #246844805 - 5/28 -01/1 3,029.39 8/09/10 5900 CTY RD 1.9 33.93 8/09/10 5700 CTY RD 19 TWIT LIGHTS 139.43 TOTAL: 3,428.91 Tree Maintenanoc+ General Fund EFTPS - FEDERAL W/H 8/03/1.0 FICA W/H 26.93 8/03/10 MEDICARE W/H 6.30 PERA 8/03/10 P/R LEDUCTS -PERA 30.39 - PAYROLL EXPENSES 8/02/2010 - 99/99/9999 434.18 TOTAL: 497.80 Parks & Recreation General Fund EFTPS - FEDERAL W/H 8/03/10 FICA W/H 190.85 8/03/10 MEDICARE W/H 44.64 PERA 8/03/10 P/R DEDUCTS-UEFA 121.79 COMMUNITY REC RESOURCES 8/09/10 PCS - 07/26 -08/06 1,485.00 MISC. VENDOR LANDSCAPE STRUCTURES 8/09/10 MANOR /FREEMAN PARK - INV 4M7 1,315.79 PAETEC 6 /09/10 02/26 -03/25 SVC 145.60 MENARDS 8/09/10 POCKY RINK BOARD 213.41 XCEL ENERGY 8/09/10 STMT #246844805 - 5/28 -07/1 416.19 ON SITE SANITATION INC 8/09/10 BADGER PARK 45.96 8/09/1.0 CATHCART PARK 45.96 8/09/?.0 FREEMAN PARK 266.13 8/09/10 MANOR PARK 45.96 8/09/10 SILVERWOOD PARK 45.96 8/09/10 SOUTH SHORE SKATE 45.96 8/09/10 CHRISTMAS LAKE BOAT ACCESS 187.03 8/09/10 BIRCH BLUFF ROAD 45,96 'PAYROLL EXPENSES 8/02/2010 - 99/99/9999 3,136.20 TOTAL: 1 ,798.35 Unallocated Expenees Cen©ra1 Fund MEDICA 8/09/10 TUNE -BRUCE STARK 1,150.27 8/09/10 AUG MEDICAL 'REM 13,265.53 UNUM LIFE INSURANCE CO 8/09/10 AUG LIFE INS PREM 1,235.20 AFSCME CO 5 MEMBERS HEALTH FUND 8/09/10 AUG UNION DENIAL PRIM 357.00 PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL GROUP 8/09/10 AUG DENTAL PRIM 765.68 TOTAL: 16,773.68 Park Capital Improveme Park Capital Impro WESTONKA SEWER & WATER 8/09/10 MANOR RD- INSTALL SW & WA 4,500.00 MIDWEST PLAYSCAPES, INC. 8/09/10 SILVE'RWOOD PARK SHELTER 5,626.58 PETE SEAMA.NS CONSTRUCTION 8/09/10 REMODEL OF MANOR PARK 15,571.00 8/09/10 BUILD PINIC SHELTER ©SILVE 920.00 FASTENAL COMPANY 8/09/10 SILVER PARK SHELTER RETURN 40.52- 8/09/10 SILVER PARR SHELTER _ 91 TO - A; 26 668.19 08 -05 -2010 12:5- AM C 0 U N C I L REPORT BY DEPARTMENT - GLOP 09, 2018 PAGE: 4 DEPAR TMENT FUND VENDOR NAME ........_. D ATE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT Equipment Replacement Equipment Replacem I -STATE TRUCK CENTER 8/09/10 TRANSIT TAX NEW DUMP TRUCK 20.00 MTI DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 8/09/10 MOWER -CIP EQPMT 20,528.66 TOTAL: 20,548.66 Street Capt ImpTCVemen Street Capital Imp MARTIN MARIETTA AGGREGATES 8/09/10 SEALCOAT -ROAD CIA 27,762.27 WK. MUELLER N SONS, INC. 8/09/10 P.V.p2 - PROJECT N0. 10 -01 104,1.08.38 NORTHWEST ASPHALT, INC. 8/09/10 P.V.1 EARDING LN /AVE REEA 36,9G5.50 WSB AND ASSOCIATES 8/09/10 JUNE SMITHTOWN ON REHAB 3,718.50 8/09/10 JUNE HARKING LN /AVE REHAB 709.50 8/09/10 JUNE NIELSON DR 4,512.00 8/09/10 JUN MEADOWVT &W NEIGHBORH00 6,816.00 8/09/10 JUNE -2010 BITUMINCUS MILL 192.00 TOTAL: 184,724.15 Senior Community Cente Scathshore Commune EFTPS - FEDERAL W/H 8/03/10 FICA W/H 35.09 8/03/10 MEDICARE W/H 8.20 PERA 8/03/10 P/R DEDUCTS -PERA 39.58 COMMUNITY REC RESOURCES 8/09/10 SSCC ASSISTANT- 07/26 -07/29 165.75 8/09/10 KIND QTR SSCC COMMISSION 2,542.79 G & K SERVICES 8/09/10 SSCC SVC 47.24 MEDIACOM 8/09/10 SSCC - 07/16 -08/15 SVC 47.95 XCEI, ENERGY 8/09/1.0 SSCC- 06/22 -07/24 758.21 SAGA HILL EVENTS 8/09/10 SSCC - 05/01/10 EVENT -GEN 175.00 WASTE MANAGEMENT -TC WEST 8/09/10 SSCC -AUG SVC 140.11 ­PAYROLL EXPENSES 8/02/2010 - 99/99/9999 565.50 TO'.1N,, 4,525.40 NON- DEPARTMENTAL Water Utility MISC. VENDOR SIVERTS, GEORGE/MOLL 8/09/10 03750204 -00 172.61 TOTAL: 172.61 . Water Water Utility EDITS - FEDERAL W/B 8/03/10 FICA W/H 16039 8/03/10 MEDICARE W/H 37.46 PERA 8/03/10 P/R DFTUCTS -PERA 188.04 CITY OF CHANHASSEN 8/09/10 018505 -000 ACCT SVC Ae RES 76.90 8/09/10 018505 -001 ACCT SVC ADDRES 3,946.39 HAWKINS, INC. 8/09/10 CHEMICAL H2O 64.12 GOLFER STATE, ONE CALL 8/09/10 JULY SVC 118.32 PAF,TEC 8/09/1.0 02/26 -03/25 SVC 98.70 8/09/10 02/26 -03/25 SVC 100.25 AMERICAN MESSAGING 8/09/10 AUG PAGER 4.49 XCE:., ENERGY 8/09/10 24253 SMTWN RD - 06/22 -07/2 1,210.99 8/09/10 STM- 4246844805 - 5/28 -07/1 975.15 8/09/10 STMT$246844805 - 5/28 -07/1 1,386.57 8/09/10 STMT4246844805 - 5/28 -07/1. 2,534.01 FERGUSON WATERWORKS 8/09/10 WATER METER PART 32.45 8/09/1.0 WATER METER 117.48 8/09/10 WATER METER 616.75 TWIN CITY WATER CLINIC 8/09/10 AUG BACTERIA ANALYSIS 100.00 GREET 8109110 07/25 -08/24 65.65 8/09/10 07/25 -08/24 66.17 WSB AND ASSOCIATES 8/09/10 JUNE CIS & CAD SUPPORT 1.300.50 08 -OS -2010 12:54 AM C O U N C I L REPORT By DEPARTMENT - AUGY 09, 2010 PAGE: I DEPART FUND VE NDOR NAM DATE D AMOUNT 'PAYROLL EXPENSES 8/02/2010 - 99/99/9999 2,686.08 TCTAL: 15,886.46 Sewer Sanitary Sewer Uti EFTPS - FEDERAL W/H 8/03/10 FICA W/H 136.67 8/03/10 MEDICARE W/H 31.96 PERA 8/03/10 P/R DEDUCTS -PERA 157.43 GOPHER STATE ONE CALL 8/09/10 JULY SVC 118.33 METRO COUNCIL ENVMT(WASTEWATER) 8/09/10 AUG WASTEWATER SVC 49,027.65 AMERICAN MESSAGING 8/09/10 AUG PAGER 4.49 XCEL ENERGY 8/09/10 STMT #246844805 - 5/28 07/1 525.93 WESTERNS, SEWER & WATER 8/09/10 SW EXPLORATION BIRCH BLUFF 1,054.55 VALLEY -RICH CO., INC. 8/09/10 SEWER REPAIR @ BIRCH BLUFF 5,299.52 VERL'ZON WIRELES6 8/09/10 L.S. SVC 06/22 -07/21 213.27 ­PAYROLL EXPENSES 8/02/2010 - 99/99/9999 2,249.06 TOTAL: 56,816.8E Recycling Recycling Utility EFTPS - FEDERAL W/H 8/03/10 FICA W/H 7.73 8/03/10 MEDICARE W/H 1.81 PERA 8/03/10 P/R DEDUCTS -PERA 8.73 ­PAYROLL EXPENSES 8/02/2010 - 99/99/9999 124.70 TOTAL: 142.97 9TORMWATER MANAGEMENT Stormwater Managem EFTPS - FELERAL WIN 8/03/10 FICA W/H 27.25 8/03/10 MEDICARE W/H 6.36 PERA 8/03/10 Pie DEDUCTS PENN 30.76 - MISC. VENDOR BEST ::ANAGEM &'NT PRODUC 8/09/1.0 DRAINAGE STRUCTURE -INN #529 761.88 SIR AND ASSOCIATES 8/09/10 JUN WATERFORD POND ST SW R 1,960.50 ­PAYROLL EXPENSES 8/02/2010 - 99/99/9999 439.64 TOTAL: 3,226.39 ------ _.,..: FUND TOTALS --------- ------ 101 General Fund 200,820.69 402 Park Capital Improvements 26,668.49 403 Equinment Rep:iacement 20,548.66 404 Street Capital Improvemen 184,724.15 490 Southshore Community Ctr. 4,525.40 601 Water Uti Lty 16,059.07 611 Sanitary Sewer Utility 56,816.86 621 . Recycling Uti Lty 142.99 631 StIlreater M,IIgement Util 3,226.39 GRAND TOTAL: 513,532.68 TOTAL PAGES: 5 Department: Planning Council Meeting: From: Brad Nielsen, Planning Director 8/9/10 Item Number: 3B Item Description: Massage Therapist License — Gardner, Bruns, Brokl Background / Previous Action Our office has received three new applications for therapeutic massage licenses in conjunction with the new La Vida massage business locating in the Shorewood Village Center. Anna Gardner (see Attachment 1), Alesia Bruns (Attachment II), and Andrew Brokl (Attachment III) have all submitted the required fees, proof of insurance, evidence of training and proof of experience (minimum 500 hours), pursuant to Chapter 311 of the City Code. Staff is currently in the process of verifying background information. For the Brokl application, we are also tracking down the requisite hours requirement. In reviewing these applications and a couple previous to them, staff realized that nothing in Chapter 311 of the Municipal Code requires that the City Council approve therapeutic massage licenses. The very first licenses issued after the code was adopted were referred to the City Council and all since have been forwarded to the Council as a matter of practice. Staff questions the need to have the Council review each application and suggests that these items be handled administratively in the future. Options Approve the licenses, deny the licenses, or continue action on the licenses. Staff Recommendation Unless something negative comes back to us relative to the applicants' applications, the credentials appear to be in order. As such, staff recommends approval of the licenses. It is also recommended that these applications be processed administratively in the future. Since this item is on the consent agenda, the item should be removed for discussion if the Council disagrees with staffs suggestion. Council Action: Print Form THERAPEUTIC SS GE LICENSE � � a Office Use: License Year: Date: -'/ - 3U - t b Application Fee *: $150 Investigation Fee * *: o' `` Receipt # ' Permit #: Name: ��� ���.�� � Phone: t0 �C 9 n rr AA n� Birthdate: J , I�' %/ 'Address: 1 0) '' "T I � aX e- AW 60Y S P d M 0L/ f7 c� mo /day /yr Street Clity site Address: '2 3 -Igc) 14 w t-� Street Description of services you will provide- (" 0.SSr� 4 V eG Q � Attachment Required: Educational Requirements (initial application only) — V'� 500 hours coursework requirement (initial application only) Certificate of insurance Exceptions to License Requirements: Attach a copy of qualified state license Fee: $150* Investigation Fee: (initial application only) ** Term: Expires December 31 of each year. Renewal required annually. Si ature ofllppZ'tle Date APPROVED Planning Director Approved by City Council on Date Attachment T Having the skills, knowledge and experience necessary to receive this certificate, The Aveda Institute - Minneapolis certifies that Anna Gardner has successfully completed 600 hours in the science of Massage Therapy and Spa Esthetics ABMP 8/4/2010 4:27 PAGE 2/2 Fax Server A2 ^.,oeis;ad Skim Care Certificate of Insurance Profoodonaa OCC:UMNCE COWRAGE ASCU In -Dues Liability Program INSURED MARLING ADDRESS PRODUCER Associated Skin Care Rafe a hateda b7idwea Gmaal Agericy 25188 Gemara Trail Road Genesee. Colorado 80401 AGENT/BROKER: Midwest General Agency POLICY 9 CL4 8 01 01 4 23 EVANSTON INSURANCE CO. MASTER POLICY EFFECTIVE DATE: 1/1/2010 Coverage afforded to individzal maabms by this pdiry is anp1ka,1, fa u period d 12 mando frao the that, the member ea added by mdov,,a a a eatil the indivdad member a coverage N ancdled a they «vse to be n wee comber d the tai. LBBIIITY LIMI'T'S (p, member) COMMERCIAL GENERAL I TABDdTY -,, "- GEP1 .`. etiGGREGATE .............................. ............................... $3,000,000 , > COMP /OP AGGREGATE ........ ............................... $3,000,000 =_. .:me;!R'ISN7SSIONA7. AGGREGATE .................... ............................... $3,000000 -�x. -sr ONAL &ADV>?RT75ING INJC TRY ........ ............................... $2,000,000 �MM FF ,..,..._: EACH OCCUPMENCE_.._ ........ ............................... .....................$2,000,000 FIRE DAMAGE Marn' To Premises Rented'I'o You)............ $100,000 S eF To verify union, tact ASCP. Teh 303-670,7606 Fax: 303 674 -0859 11ds Crete provides proof of -M Ym the andKsliS lh : - reed en&.w holder (membu) onlp.tm ceddloatc DOGS NOT provide prof of cov¢age Fa any ee p pyme , Independent cornnffil&, or any cAM duaLs affft atedwoh the named oaMme holder Hach IMDWMUAL itaued hACP member is hatred their arm a cerdicate of ilaa ea am �y sLi ;@M1he membership inception date teft bptembetsfups, 0VpvUon date. (AatveRegWered Members are nn file tdtb tbeASCPMemberft Q aiophafF) Member Name: Anna Gardner Membership I.D. #: 982692 Insured Active Date: August 5, 2010 Membership/Foley Term Expiration: August 4, 2011 Issue Date: August 5, 2010 Authorized Representative - - - -- GNtELL1'ItON: Shuldthe abwe&&adaedpWwbe=eoHvdbdaed,e p'vedm dae,hooX. the ssdng eaaPanY will eadeva to mal 10 drys wilaem mice fa nor paymau a 30 days wkcm mice eery ahae . the mtEae halo named above, but buuacto mail.,a nWce shall Impose no abR,velm te 13a&y d any kind eeov aanPwtY. usagentsarcpeaenidives. AEMP -19 (01 /10) Rev, 12/09 THERAPEU a y,, MASSAGE LICENSE y CITY OF APPLICATION SHOREWOOD (pursuant to City Code Section 311) 5755 County Club Road • Shorewood, Minnesota 55331 ^ (952) 474 -3236 Office Use: License Year: Date: Application Fee *: _ , $ 150 Investigation Fee * *: �/o c, Receipt # c3 / (Lc'' Permit #: Name: f v/4 Birthdate: �J3 (��Address nioldaaylyr Site Address: J &7,A) - 1 Street Description of services you will ' n /Y 020 Street 7,��� City �. Attachments Required: A Educational Requirements (initial application only) �� Y 500 hours coursework requirement (initial application only) K,% 0 X_ Certificate of Insurance Exceptions to License Requirements: Attach a copy of qualified state license Fee: $150* �v j6 Investigation Investigation Fee: r OCJ (initial application only) ** (,jt Term: Expires December 31 of each year. Renewal required annually, nQ t, d Signat"e�f lica nt Title Date'' APPROVED: Planning Director Approved by City Council on Date I Attachment 11 ' 'G Q'R NR- g77R51+TY 14 ti5 Coun:y Road lot Noah ��` .i 1"al N i:S' Of A , C s k T u S P lymouth, honx:763 - -2000 �� Cfi�lu Tl) .:� e, 411�.S1 -S;,;, -5 Pl.one. 763 -47Fi -2000 Toll- tree: 866 -?76 -2121 Fax: 763-476-1000 www.msbcolle May 6, 2008 To Whom It May Concern: My name is Regina Hughes, NCTMB. I currently hold the Massage Program Coordinator position, and am also a massage instructor at the Plymouth campus of Minnesota School of Business/Globe College. It is my pleasure to furnish you with this letter documenting Alesia Bruns' completion of our 600 -hour Massage Therapy Program in March 2008 from the Minnesota School of Business, Plymouth Campus. She completed all necessary requirements to fulfill her academic and financial responsibilities with our college. Below you will see a listing of classes she completed. 40:00 CM155 Interpersonal Relations (Transfer) 20:00 IIS155 CPR/FirstAid/AED 47:62 MAl 10 Anatomy and Physiology 66:68 MS105 Massage Techniques 1 45:00 IIS150 Kinesiology 73:34 MS205 Massage Techniques 2 155:00 MS260 Massage Techniques 3 and Externship 17:14 CM250 Career Development 33:32 MA100 Medical Terminology 35:56 MS210 Business of Massage 27:50 HS200 Biomechanics 561:16 TOTAL HOURS ATTENIDENCE. Thank you for utilizing professional standards in your licensing procedures. If you have any questions, please feel free to call me. Sincerely, / i Z Regina Hughes, NCTMB ? Jodi Boisjolie -Rosen Massage Program Coordinator Dean of Students Massage Instructor Minnesota School of Business 1455 County Road 101 North 1455 County Road 101 North Plymouth, MN 55447 Plymouth, MN 55447 763.398.5934 763.398.5914 MINNESOTA -SC H001 OF BUSINESS 1455 County Road lot Norttr Plymoueh, MN 55447 GAOH H C®ULEGB Phone: 763- 476 -2000 Toll -Free: 1- 866 -476 -2121 Fax: 763- 476 -1060 www.msbcollege.edu February 11, 2008 To Whom It May Concern: Alesia Bruns has been a student in our Massage Therapy Diploma Program and will graduate in March 2008. She is very gifted and focused as a student and Massage Therapist. Her responsibilities include performing massage, including modalities such as Swedish Massage, Deep Tissue, Trigger Point Therapy, and Assisted Stretching Techniques among others. Other miscellaneous responsibilities were cleaning massage equipment, preparing and carrying out office procedures, and using proper documentation; SOAP note charting. Alesia is adept at Swedish massage. However, she is also proficient in the Clinical applications of massage. She utilizes her various skill sets to best fit the needs of her clients. Her level of professionalism and adherence to ethical standards is high. It was a pleasure to have her as a student, and if given the opportunity to employ Alesia some day, I would have no reservations. If you are in need of more information, please contact me either through email at reinahn�hes(c�j or call my office at (763) 398 -5934. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, Program Coordinator :a School of Business 1455 County Road 101 North Plymouth, MN 55447 763- 398 -5934 SUCCESSFUL FUTURES START HERE[ IRmerican Massage Therapy y As c io 1 1 ff �a E A J o AU? Certificate of Insurance ANITA Member 1O#f 214125 Alesia Brans PO Box 286 Wayzata, MN 55391 -0286 Administered By: Healthcare Providers Service Organization Affinity Insurance Services, Inc. 159 East County Line Road Hatboro PA 19040 -1218 AMTA Member Classification: PROP` Enrolled Member Effective late: 03/01/2010 12:01 AM Standard Time to 02/28/201112:01 AM Standard Time Insurance Company: American Casualty Company of Reading, Pennsylvania A CNA Admitted Company T e of Insurance Master Policy Number Limits ( enrolled member) Professional Liability 0289955556 $2,000,000 each claim / $6,000,000 aggregate Occurrence Covera Z e Subject to the Master Policy Aggregate Coverage is afforded to AMTA Members for a period of 12 months concurrent with the Enrolled Member Effective Date or until membership is terminated or expires. If the AMTA Master Policy is non - renewed or cancelled, the AMTA Member's coverage under this policy will terminate upon the expiration of the Enrolled Member Effective Date and will not be renewed. The Master Polic Aaareaate mav be reduced by claims aid on behalf of other insureds. Additional Coverages (included in Professional Liability Limits specified above): g General Liability o Products Liability * Host Liquor Liability a Personal Injury Liability ® Good Samaritans Liability ® Malplacement Liability a Fire & Water Legal Liability (subject to $100,000 sub limit) Coverage Extensions Coverage Extension Limits License Protection $10,000 per proceeding / $25,000 aggregate Defendant Expense Benefit $10,000 aggregate Deposition Representation $2,500 per deposition / $5,000 aggregate Assault (excluding Texas) $10,000 per incident / $25,000 aggregate Medical Payments $2,000 per person / $100,000 aggregate First Aid $2,500 aggregate Damage to Property of Others $ 10,000 aggregate Tirs material is intended to provide a general overview of the products and services offered. Coverage for enrolled member's business is limited to claim arising from enrolled member's professional services. Only the policy can provide the actual terms, coverage's, amounts, conditions a nd exclusions. PIease contact HPSO at 1- 883 - 253 -1474 directly for free c opy of the complete policy. 000165140109 nc+khene! mtdes SemEw Oe�gNn� inn'^ AM'a. A Coverage age AM`I'A Members are covered for professional services for which the enrolled member is licensed, certified, accredited or professionally trained to perform as a massage therapist. If an enrolled member practices in any jurisdiction which governs massage therapy services, then massage therapy services means those services for which the enrolled member is licensed, certified, accredited, trained or qualified to perform within the scope of practice recognized by the governmental regulatory agency responsible for maintaining the standards of the profession of massage therapy. Professional services also means the enrolled member's massage therapy services while acting as a member of a formal accreditation, standards review, or similar professional board or conunittee, including the directives of such board or committee. As an AMTA enrolled member covered. by our insurance program, enrolled members are responsible for and expected at all times to be familiar and current with all laws, regulations, etc. in their state of practice that govern their profession as a massage therapist. Modality Exclusions Any acts, errors or omissions involving the activities designated below are excluded. This list is subject to review and change by AMTA. For the most up -to -date list, go to the Benefits page in the members' section of the AMTA website: www.amtarnassage.org. Colon hydrotherapy, nutritional or dietary counseling, exercise, yoga, pilates, religious healing, procedures that use fire, cupping therapy with use of heat, ear candling, saunas, sun tanning treatments other than tanning lotions or sprays, procedures which penetrate the skin or body cavities either manually or with other methods of intrusion other than manual soft tissue manipulation of the oral or nasal cavities. Diagnosis, prescription, or service in the capacity of any other profession or branch of healthcare or medicine for which a license to practice is required by law including chiropractic, dentistry, dermatology, naprapathy, naturopathy, nursing, orthopedics, osteopathy, physical therapy, pediatric, psychiatry, psychology or psychotherapy. Additional Information An AMTA membership card in conjunction with this notice should serve as acceptable evidence of insurance to anyone requesting proof of your professional liability coverage. If you have any additional questions concerning the AMTA Professional Liability Insurance Plan, please call our insurance administrator, HPSO, toll free at 1- 888 - 253- 1474.'We are dedicated to giving you the best service possible and thank you for the opportunity to provide this insurance and membership to you. Please also feel free to call AMTA with questions or comments. Reporting Claims Please call HPSO toll free at 1- 888 - 253 -1474 for claim reporting procedures or refer to the AMTA Professional Liability Benefits Guide. Additional Insured Requests Please call. HPSO toll free at 1- 888 - 253 -1474 for additional insured requests. This program is underwritten by American Casualty Company of Reading, Pennsylvania a CINA company and is offered through the Healthcare Providers Service Organisation Risk Purchasing Group. This material is intended to provide a general overview of the products and services offered. Only the policy can provide the actual terms, coverage's, amounts, conditions and exclusions. Please contact HPSO at 1- 888 -253 -1474 directly for a copy of the complete policy. Healthcare Providers Service Organization (HPSO) is a division of Affinity Insurance Services, Inc., in CA (License 40795465), MN and OK, MS Affinity Insurance Agency and NY, AIS Affinity Insurance Agency. 0001 bwo 109 11 P,eHuta Sixidm Orynnimeion- z u � it # t7 A4 td „ t:3 3i t3 yy %N f!•d IFI r4 � Q Q1 V z � � � � \ � A � � � N � \ o f C) ® - \ \ { r ! - . : _ y k }) \\ \ } § THERAPEUTIC j MASSAGE LICENSE clTV of APPLICATION SHOREOOD (pursuant to City Code Section 311) 5755 Country Club Road ^ Shorewood, Minnesota 55331 • (952) 474 -3236 Office Use: License Year: Date: Application Fee *: $150 In vestigation Fee * *: 1 6 00.00 Receipt# Permit #: Name § t� i 7 � } Phone: Birthdate: �� (��(� Address: `� � "�i tv�ncc —t Yt�nr7 - � 7 s' - In N moldaylyr kreet / rtv Site Address: {'i( ) C C / 'r''r Street l Description of services you will provide: Attachments Required: / Educationat Requirements (initial application only) 500 hours courseworlcrequirement (initial application only) " Certificate of Insurance Exceptions to License Requirements: Attach a copy of qualified state license Fee: $150* Investigation Fee: (initial application only) ** Term: Expires December 31 of each year. Renewal required annually. I L dotlt 2 o yippli.cant Title I Date APPROVED: Director Approved by City Council on Attachment III Date I ALLIED PROFESSIONALS INSURANCE COMPANY, A Ri sk Retention Group, Inc 4 n �r Named Insured Member: Member Policy No.: Master Policy: Master Policy Held By: Claims Reporting Basis: Professional Services: Exclusions: Limitations: Territory: Individual Deductible per claim: Endorsement(s): Limits of Liability: Total Annual Cost Basis: Premium Based On: Lapse Dates: Retroactive Date: Policy Period: Please direct all inquiries to your broker Andrew P. Book), L.M.T. APIM 666471 APIC- AMC -1001 Preferred; Issued in CA American Massage Council Claims Made Massage As stated in Section V of Endorsement to Policy None United States - The Named Insured must maintain professional licensing as required by each state in which the Named Insured practices for coverage to apply in that state. None Massage 51,000,000 Each Claim / 53,000,000 Aggregate S 99.00 (Premium - $ 33.15; Policy Fee- $ 5.85, Membership Fee - $ 60.00; Install Chrg- $ .00) Annual Reporting Period Payment Plan: Annually From: To: 3/1 {2005 From: 3/1/2010 To: 3/1/2011 Phone: (All dates are at 12:01 a.m. at address of Named Insured. Unless renewed, coverage ends on the Expiration Date.) General: This Declarations Page identifies the person(s) named herein as a named insured under the terms and conditions of a policy issued to the members of the American Massage Council. The terms and conditions of the policy apply to all members who hold a certificate of insurance. The terms and conditions of this certificate apply only to the person(s) named herein and the insurer. The Retroactive Date listed above applies only to those attributes of coverage in place continuously since the inception of the Named Insured's Policy. When changes to coverage are requested, including but not limited to changes in Limits, switching from Preferred to Elite, adding Professional Services, etc., such changes are effective retroactively only to the date the change was approved by the Company. Coverage: Coverage is afforded to person(s) named herein as Named Insureds according to the terms and conditions of the policy to which this certificate refers. No other rights or conditions, except as specifically stated herein are granted or inferred. When your Claims Reporting Basis is "Claims Made" the Policy affords defense and damage coverage only for claims made against the Named Insured 1) arising from the performance of Professional services rendered during the subsequent to the Retroactive Date and 2) made against the Named Insured and reported to the Company during the Policy Period. Please review the policy carefully and discuss any questions regarding coverage with the insurance broker at (800) 500 3930 Extended Coverage: I'f your Claims Reporting Basis is "Claims Made" and the Policy is terminated either by you or the Company you may apply for Extended Coverage so that you can submit claims after your policy period ends for incidents that occurred during your policy period. An application for Extended Coverage must be received within 30 days of termination of your policy, unless otherwise modified by any applicable State Mandatory Endorsement attached hereto. Notice: Report in writing within 48 hours any & all claims against you and any & all incidents that you believe may result in a claim against you, even if groundless, to American Massage Council, 1851 E. First Street, Suite 1160, Santa Ana, CA 92705. Notice: This policy is issued by your risk retention group. Your risk retention group may not be subject to all of the insurance laws and regulations of your State. State insurance insolvency guaranty funds are not available for your risk retention group. Countersigned by: Printetl 1/292010 4l! 1 f b a • • • 3 o� I 0 ° J 1 !4 LJ \/ oo ul { = ~t r/» o :r e °Z ƒ� y2t �e :2 kt\ 7� \ 5 \� o \° / \ <{ _- \� <? » ;© / . \�^ \\ ® 77^ LU « \\ » \U . \ \ ` \� 0<1 \2 Jf & : \ \ &: IL $L Department Engineering Council Meeting 8/9/10 Item Number: 3C From: James Landini, P.E. Item Description: Televise Sanitary Sewer on the Islands Background / Previous Action In 2010 we propose to televise 10,704 linear feet of sanitary sewer main, inspect 58 structures and where necessary televise the service laterals. Attachment 2 demonstrates the locations of work. The specifications were sent to seven firms, inviting them to quote the project. Two firms provided a Quote for the 2010 Sanitary Sewer Jet Vacuum Cleaning, Main Line Televising, Structure Inspection, Lateral Inspection and Internal Chemical Grouting Project which were opened and tabulated on August 04, 2010. Pipe Services Corporation quoted $13,224.40 and Infratech quoted $21,207.20 for the cleaning and televising portion of the project. The low quoter is Pipe Services Corporation in the amount of $13,224.40. Alternate quote items to repair issues were requested to negotiate repairs at a later date. Pipe Services Corporation quote included $120.00 per linear foot of structure grouting. They do not have the equipment to chemical grout pipe. Infratech will be contacted for pipe repairs. The quantity of repairs will be identified during the televising portion of the project. The City of Minnetrista used Pipe Services Corporation for past projects with good results. This project will be funded by the Sewer Enterprise Budget which budgeted $70,000. Options 1. Direct staff to contract with Pipe Services Corporation for this project. 2. Direct staff to utilize a different quoter. 3. Do nothing. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends direction to work with Pipe Services Corporation for the 2010 Sanitary Sewer Jet Vacuum Cleaning, Main Line Televising, Structure Inspection, Lateral Inspection not to exceed $20,000. Council Action: V STATEMENT OF ESTIMATED QUANTITES MH so-n MH 60-17A ITEM 7 DESCRIPTION UNIT =1 QT Z S \ @ 001 — INSP., CLEAN & TELEVISE 9 SAN. SEWER LF 10,704 MH MH 60-17 002 STRUCTURE INSPECTIONS EACH 58 4325 ZY CO 60-12 6 003 TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL I LUMP SUM I ,30 MH MH 60-2 MH 60-18 H 6 49801 60-13 NNred 4320 H H 60-15 MH 9 4475% PHELPS BAY 4 380 4485 H 60-15, 4 9 , 4320 4415 MH LO 0 N 00 , I , nAt 4 4 3 " MH 60-6 ;g 9 5 5 ,3�� JA 0 NR> MH H 59 N MH 59- l 4845 59- % X4720 8S CG 71 0 3C X Q 0) 62-3 -IA LEGEND Cf) PH V) Z MH s9 MIT 62-2 (7 4725 -z pro O LIFT STATION < 2 < MH < 0 SAN. MAIN LINE MH 9 45 50 AND DIRECTION < hi 0 1 443 ,, MH -20 OF FLOW (9 PVC) —1 u 14H 5 0 4560 4 ,3 9 STRUCTURE NO. H 4555 MH 61-17 MH 61-1 7 Ls,NDJ5 H 61-13 MH 6119 M 4405 MET COUNCIL MAIN CIL < q 456 NC NT ED 4595 < ol < 4205 4245t we % PROJECT AREA Attachment #2 City of Shorewood -llltS If FIbl , W,,-, I'd - 11111, 9 5755 Cour.V C Rd MN 55331 152 9BG /010 Department Council Meeting Item Number Administration August 9, 2010 10 - A From: Brian Heck, City Administrator Item — Council Chambers Sign Description /Background /Previous Action The City Council indicated an interest in having a sign behind the dais identifying the chambers as the City of Shorewood particularly for those who view the meeting on the web or television. Staff contacted a few organizations that make such signs and is interested in receiving feedback from the Council on the attached concept for the sign. The sign is made of black acrylic and precision cut. The estimated cost is $1,000 and would come from the Public Facilities fund. Staff is seeking direction. Council Action: J m i? 19l11, yk re 10 N all 9 0 aIIil:1Ul Department Engineering Council Meeting 08/9/10 Item Number: 11A.1 From: James Landini, P.E. Item Description: Waterford Pond Outlot A Maintenance. Background / Previous Action A request to perform maintenance on the Waterford Pond, Outlot A, control structure was received on 4/15/10. Staff removed leaves and branches that were plugging the outlet structure. It was noted that the outlet control structure is physically deteriorated enough that the reinforcement wires are exposed and one of the pond inlets is sliding into the pond. Since this pond has quite a long legal history, staff will enlist the assistance of WSB to document the existing conditions and provide a replacement design. One of the goals for a new structure would be a design that allows a lower frequency of removing tree litter. WSB documented the existing conditions, and designed a maintenance project that includes a lower maintenance comparable outlet structure. Plans and specs were sent to four contracting firms. Two quotes were collected; Machtemes Construction quoted $26,365.00 and G. F. Jedlicki quoted $41,939.00 to perform the maintenance. Staff will be working with Machtemes Construction to perform the maintenance Options 1. Accept the report. 2. Do nothing. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends accepting the report. Council Action: