Loading...
10-11-10 CC Reg AgpCITY OF SHOT EWOOD CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MONDAY, OCTOBER 11., 2010 AGENDA 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7 :00 P.M> 1. CONVENE CITY COUNCIL MEETING A. Roll Call Mayor Liz& Bailey _ Turgeon Woodruff Zerby _ B. Review Agenda 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. City Council Work Session Minutes, September 27, 2010 Minutes B. City Council Regular Meeting Minutes, September 27, 2010 Minutes 3. CONSENT AGENDA - Motion to approve items on Consent Agenda & Adopt Resolutions Therein: NOTE: Give the public an opportunity to request an item be removed from the Consent Agenda. Comments can betaken or questions asked following removal from Consent Agenda A. Approval of the Verified Claims List Claims List B. Setting the Date for the 2010 Appreciation Event Administrator CAF C. Accept Amended Petition for Star Lane and Star Circle Road Improvement Engineer CAF Project 4. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR (No Council action will be taken) 5. PUBLIC HEARING 6. REPORTS AND PRESENTATIONS 7. PARKS 8. PLANNING - Report by Representative 9. ENGINEERING/PUBLIC WORKS A. Accept Low Quote and Award Contract for Lift Station 15 Rehabilitation Director of PW Project. CAF, Resolution CITY COUNCIL EGULA ;-E "TINE AGENDA — October t T. 2010 Page 2 of 2 B. Accept Low Quote and Award Contract for Lift Station 17 rehabilitation Director of PW Project. CAF, Resolution C. Staff Report on the Storm Mater Maintenance Program Director of PW Deport 10. GENERAL/NEW BUSINESS A. Therapeutic Massage License Fees Administrator CAF B. Police Department Management Study Administrator CAF 11. S'TAF'F AND COUNCIL REPORTS A. Administrator and Staff B. Mayor and City Council 12. ADJOURN CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 Country Club Road e Shorewood, Minnesota 55331 a 952 - 960 -7900 Fax: 952 -474 -0228 ® www.ci.shorowood.mn.us a cityhall i)ci.shorcwood.mn.us Executive Summary Shorewood City Council Regular Meeting Monday, 11 October, 2010 7 :00 p.m. Agenda Item #3C: Star Lane and Star Circle residents have submitted an amended petition to stop the road improvement project. One additional residence was added. Staff recommends accepting the petition by motion. Agenda Item 48: A representative will report on the recent Planning Commission meeting. Agenda Item #9A: Staff is recommending that a resolution be approved that accepts the low quote and awards the contract to Minger Construction, for an amount of $118,088.80 for the Lift Station 15 Rehabilitation Project. Agenda Item #913: Staff is recommending that a resolution be approved that accepts the low quote and awards the contract to Minger Construction for an amount of $116,320.90 for the Lift Station 17 Rehabilitation Project. Agenda Item #9C: At the September 27` 2010 City Council Meeting, Councilmember Turgeon asked staff to report back regarding the inspection and maintenance schedule for storm water systems. Staff has included a report for reference. Agenda Item #10A: Mr. Steven Gamm, Owner /Operator — LaVida Massage, contacted us regarding the license fee his therapists are assessed to practice massage therapy and wants the Council to consider revising the fees and allowing for pro - rating of license fees. His request, as well as information on license fees in other metro cities is provided for council discussion. It is expected that Mr. Gamm will be present at Monday's meeting. AgendaItem #1013: SLMPD management study discussion. Gr _ CITY OF S ORE OOD CITE' COUNCIL SESSION MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 27, 201.0 I. CONVENE CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION B. Review Agenda Turgeon moved, Woodruff seconded, 2. 5755 COUNTY CLUB ROAD COUNCIL, CHAMBERS 6;00 P.M. agenda as presented. Motion passed 510. MEASURABLE MANAGEMENT Mayor Lizee stated Molly McDpi program titled Measurable' VManag Administrator Heck stated he has program. This program mclud6s v effectiveness aid efficiency, 'to evaluate their'effecttveness, Ms. IV is present this evening to provide Council with an overview of a �t. n meeting with Ms 'McDonald over the last 1.5 years about this r}g with all levels of staff to identify ways to improve operational ify Bard :and soft savings, to implement selected changes, and pald is one of the facilitators for this program. Ms McDonald explained the ;grogram was started in the United Kingdom and it has been used in the United Siates since 2005 She ',has been responsible for introducing this program in Minnesota. The City of Wacoma w4s. the first to use; the program in the State. That effort was started in 2009 and was completed in Marck12010. Wacoma had great success with the program. Ms. McDonald stated e works for a company called Fritz Partners located in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, and has been with theca for out 1.5 years. She has 20 plus years of sales experience. The company is a licensee of Measurable Management. The company is owned by Wendy Fritz Mader and was formed in 2004. Rebecca Heidepriem is the top facilitator for the company and she frequently works with her. Ms. Heiderpriem created the Leadership Academy (a management development institute) while managing Xerox's International Training Division. Mr. Heidepriem and Ms. McDonald are both former teachers. Robin Burn, from England, started the program about 15 years ago; it is practiced on four continents. Ms. McDonald explained Measurable Management is organizational improvement through change leadership. The program provides a vehicle for translating the strategies identified by the City Council for the City through the City staff and out to the City's customers. Front line staff identify areas for improvement, they identify how to make the improvements and they implement the changes. Fritz CITY OF SHOREWOOD WORK SESSION MEETING MINUTES September 27, 2010 Page 2 of 4 Ms. McDonald highlighted four key issues Administrator Heck had preliminarily identified for the City. They are: 1) improve and further develop relationships between partnering cities (share resources); 2) increase the efficiency of processes and procedures; 3) stabilize /decrease City expenditures; and, 4) develop a plan to finance the City's roadway improvement program. The 3 — 4 key issues identified and agreed upon by Council and Staff will become the success criteria for the program. Everything the participants work on in the program should help address one of the issues. Ms. McDonald then explained the program works on three platforms: 1) leadership and team building; 2) process management; 3) action. The Measurable Management program teaches particlpants to enhance both their soft skills and their technical skills. The first three sessions in the program focus on "pull style" leadership. Instead of a "my way or the highway" approach to leadership it teaches leaders to work together in a more inclusive way. It promotes involving various people when solving prof leins. The skills learned'in the first three weeks are used in the second platform. During the first two platforms, program participants focus on identifying improvement opportunities in the areas of resources, relationships, and' 'rocesses. They are encouraged to look for areas of disconnect in not only their job but also the organization as a whole. By the end of the second platform, participants should have developed a lengthy list of ideas to explore. The first two platforms will take abo , three months. At the conclusion, participants will meet with the mentor of the Measurab `le,lVlanagemenf�program. TheYwill each choose three ideas to implement. During the third platform, the` partiepants;,will select an idea and implement the idea. At the end, the participants will�review yyith Council the idea/ roblein they selected to work on, the effect it was having on the organization, what- changes "wi�re,made to improve the situation, how they measured results of the change, # 11?e return on the ,P ,pstment, and how the improvement is linked to one of the key issues Ms. McDonald ;cited one improvement made at the City of Waconia. The improvement involved using Carver County `sentence -to- serve: to clean Waconia's public service facility. The improvements saved Waconia $6,719 annually. Ms. McDonald reviewedalie financial costs for the program. A $3,500 fee is charged for each of the ten participants. If the Measurable Management program doesn't facilitate $35,000 in revenues or savings for the City, Fritz Partners will return the difference between the program cost and the benefits realized. Ms. McDonald recapped that the Measurable Management program equips staff to execute the City's strategies and to deliver results to the bottom line. It helps people overcome resistance to change. It helps develop teamwork and leadership. And, Fritz Partners guarantees the City's return -on- investment. Councilmember Woodruff asked how Fritz Partners engages with the ten participants. Ms. McDonald explained that she and Ms. Heiderpriem will facilitate and meet with the participants once every two weeks for the first three months of the program. CITY OF SHOREWOOD WORK SESSION MEETING MINUTES September 27, 2010 Page 3 of 4 Councilmember Bailey recommended Administrator Heck play a, key role in this type ,of initiative because he is responsible for the behavioral and cultural operation of the staff. Ms. McDonald stated Heck will be one of the participants in the program. Councilmember Bailey asked for clarification on how the returh is measured over the course of one year. Ms. McDonald explained, when participants identify the anticipated annual ROI for each of the proposed changes Council and Administrator Heck are asked,to assess the reality of the projected ROls. The ROls have to be agreed upo 'B that some! 'Of the issues are non-financial in nature. Ms. McDonald stated Fritz Partners suggests at'l idea for each participant is financial. Hours saved does result in a_ savings even if the hours will :Z be ' reallocated allocated to something else. She commented that over the years he prqgram has been in existence the average per-participant return has been $44,000. She noted 4 check has; never been written back to an organization. Councilmember Zerby as d Admini§trator Heck if he4ent looking for this type of program or if Fritz Partners sought the City out. Heck .stated Fritz Partne came to the City. Heck stated he practices going to front line staff them how to do'thingsl efficiently. He then stated when Ms. McDonald was first describing the-Mda Management program to him he began describing the program to her becausellit s something `be ,.has practice throughout his entire career. Heck commented that most governineti str ' "t-,organizations sfid" to measure what it does and how to measure success. gg,e with ho Administrator' Heck stated he ha§p §poken with the City Manager for Excelsior about this program. He has not yet spoken -, " , With the Chiefi6f, the South Lake Minnetonka Police Department or the Chief of the paftm Excelsior Fire Dep abQ4'the program. , Mayor Liz6e stated this type of program would provide an excellent opportunity for people to work together. She suggested Council discuss this program further. Administrator Heck stated Council will discuss this during its next budget discussion. Councilmember Turgeon stated she would like staff to provide their input about such as program. 3. TOBACCO ORDINANCE Administrator Heck explained that the State Legislature passed changes to the State law regarding the sale of tobacco products. The changes focused on updating the definitions of tobacco, tobacco products and tobacco related devices. He has asked Attorney Tietjen to review the City's Tobacco Ordinance and CITY OF SHOREWOOD WORK SESSION MEETING MINUTES September 27, 2010 Page 4 of 4 recommend changes. The meeting packet contains a draft amendment to the Ordinance. He noted a 30- day notice of the meeting during which Council will consider adopting the amendment must be provided to each of the three tobacco licensees. Councilmember Turgeon stated she will review the typographical mistakes in the amendment later with Administrator Heck. Council ember Woodruff suggested 301.13 Penalties Subd. 3. be modified. It includes a statement " „ shall be subject to enrollment and evidence of successful completion of a tobacco education course provided by Independent School District (Minnetonka) 276 or Independent School District 277 ( estonka) for the first offense ... "'. He asked "provided by Independent School District (Minnetonka) 276 or Independent School District 277 ( estonka)" be deleted and to change it to reflect that violators may be required to take a class. Councilmember Zerby asked if the changes address incense ' type tobacco products. Attorney Tietjen explained the K2 or Spice product was not addressed in this amendment. There area couple of cities that have passed ordinances relating to that. There is a lot of controversy about one of the city's ordinances. She recommended addressing K -2 or Spice at a future date.° 4. ADJOURN Woodruff moved, Turgeon seconded, Adjourning the City Council Work Session of September 27, 2010, at 6:59 P.M. Motion passed 510. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED Christine Freeman, Recorder Christine Lizee, Mayor ATTEST E; City Ad rt,. CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES September 27, 2010 Page 2 of 13 Turgeon moved, Woodruff seconded, approving the Motions Contained on the Consent Agenda and Adopting the Resolutions Therein. Motion passed 510. 4. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR as Mayor Liz& nod stated she did n k e " ' d t o that. She noted she conducts a coffee with the " mayor each T ,p Woodruff 'st ­"­ ' was part of the discussion three years ago and also agreed at _fgO May� L e to Woodruff ni"oV"' asking Mayor Lizke to cancel her coffee with the mayor session scheduled for October 9, Councilmember Zerby'' e j " t d inviting the other mayoral candidates to the session. It would provide , residents an opportunit�,.,",- speak with the candidates running for office. Mayor Liz& thought the suggestion was creative; , Councilmember Woodruff questioned how write-in candidates could be invited to the session. Councilmember Woodruff stated he does think the City should promote individual meetings with council members during the pre-election period if they are running for office. It gives the incumbent an unfair advantage. Bailey seconded. CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES September 27, 2010 Page 3 of 13 Councilmember Turgeon stated she also recollects the discussion, She expressed her disappointment the session was published in the October 2010 Shore Report. She indicated she would be willing to allow the session provided all mayoral candidates are invited. She asked Councilmember Woodruff to change his motion to have the three mayoral candidates agree to a time, date, and location for the coffee; If only Mayor Liz6e will be there, she recommends canceling the session. Councilmember Zerby stated the day and time for the session is published and stated if he were a mayoral candidate, he would appreciate having the opportunity to meet with more residents. ze such events. He also _bALY.2ri _UILUI Mayor Liz6c stated she agreed it was an oversight to includ an oversight to publish the names of the Councilmemb, discussion referred to earlier there was also agreement ,to',ri during the pre-election period and they were publish coffee with the mayor is not subsidized by the City. She sessions during both of her terms as mayor. She stated sh e session and she appreciated everyone's thoughts. Councilmember Woodruff called question. Councilmember Turgeon stated it's her understan meeting Council can not take any action. Attorn meeting. Items during ma "fr'. floor are LILTA e the session in the Shore Report. It was also ers in the Shore Report, jnoting during the of publish the names of the,council members he October Shore Report. She explained her .,,noted she chosen to h e the monthly intended to hold her coffee with the mayor i#,' g the matters from the floor portion of the ` ' state&' item is not on the agenda for this for discussion only. This item this evening is Attorney Tietjen advised withdrawing the maker of the motion withdrew the motion. ATIONS Communication Commission (LMCC) Representative Ken Ken Hendrickson, the City's resident representative to the Lake Minnetonka Communication Commission (LMCC), stated nine of the LMCC Member Cities must approve the LMCC budget in order for it to be approved and that has occurred. He explained the 2011 budget includes funding to conduct a resident survey about fiber to the premise. He thought the survey would be worthwhile. The survey will need to show there is strong interest in fiber to the premise if it's to have a chance of moving forward. CITY OF SHO REWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEE'rING MINUTE September 27, 2010 Page 4 of t Councilmember Bailey asked Mr. Hendrickson how he's enjoying his time on the LMCC. Mr. Hendrickson stated he is finding it interesting, He's indicated he's very impressed with the LMCC production crew. He thought the LMCC overall worked pretty well. Councilmember Zerby expressed his pleasure that the LMCC website will be redesigned in 2011. B. Hennepin County Commissioner Jan Callison Commissioner Callison informed Council that the County Commission set the County's total maximum levy for 2011 on September 7 The Commission sets three different levies: the general operations, the Hennepin County Regional Rail Authority (HC A) levy, and: the Housing and Redevelopment Authority levy. Commissioner Callison said the County Administrator recommended an additional $6.8 million for general operations; however, the Commissioners chose not to increase: the operating budget. The Administrator recommended increasing the HCRRAbudget by $4 million and'`the Commissioners approved a $3 million increase. The Commission accepted the Administrator's recotninendation for a $2 million increase the Housing and Redevelopment Authority budget The total levy increase is about 0.7 percent. Because there will not be any increase in the County's 2.0411 general operating budget some County services will be cut. She noted that just because there is' no increase in the operating levy it doesn't necessarily translate into a zero property tax increase for all County properties. Commissioner Callison stated a meeting on the h from 6:30 - 8:00 P.M. at the Southshore Comr, residents. She then stated the planning and researc compares County statistical data such as demogr country. The report findings rndreate the economic on the ability of its mstj i'tions to rritrve a more success and ready the for, work irxa Jigh value - Council members. Excelsior Library will be held on September 30 y Center. The purpose is to solicit input from )artment :fee the County conducted a study which s and incorrie with the State and other areas in social fut,111 of the Twin Cities will hinge in part 3e population toward post secondary educational J occupations. She left copies of the report for In response to a icox�nment from Councilmember Bailey regarding the HCRRA budget, Commissioner Callison explained theounty was a ajor player in building the Hiawatha light rail. The construction of the Centel Corridor line rs scheduled tp start, 2011 and the Southwest line is scheduled to start in 2014. Some ofd crease is necessary to finai"the project until federal fielding is received. Mayor Lizee hi ked Commissioner Callison for her time. g 7. PARKS Councilmember Bailey reported on matters considered and actions taken at the September 14, 2010, Park Commission meeting (a� detailed in the minutes of that meeting). A. Community Gardens Administrator Heck stated during its September 14, 2010, meeting the Park Commission heard a report from community garden representatives. The Park Commission recommends continuing the program and increasing the number of plots from ten to fifteen with the additional plots being added on the west. The Commission also recommends the plots be assigned on a first -come first- served basis, with Shorewood CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES September 27, 201 Page 5 € f t residents be considered first, and that returning; gardeners be given the option to select the same plots they had in 2010. Councilmember Bailey recommended the City choose a date when applications must be submitted and if there are more applicants than plots, a lottery system be used to select gardeners. Councilmember Zerby stated comments from the gardeners conveyed their appreciation to Public Works for keeping the rain barrels full. He then stated he thought the weekly' §taff report indicated.there may be a problem getting the water fountain installed in the Skate .Park. `Director Brown explained no firm submitted a bid for the installation of the water fountain. Brown"' able to convince a vendor the City works with often to consider the project with Public Works assuming responsibilities for some of the tasks that were in the original contract. The foal is to have the fountain.installed in 2010. Brown said he would prefer that once the fountain is installed the rain barrels be eliminated, but issues have to be worked out before that can happen. Councilmember' Turgeon commented that the water barrels do accumulate rain. The maker oUthe motion amended the motion to include the plots will be assigned on a first -come first - served basis,, ey e ithdrew his second. The seconder of thenotion w w 3,az CouncilmemberZerby requested the Commission have more discussion about the allocation approach. Councilmember Turgeon'agreed. The maker of the motion withdrew his motion. Woodruff moved, Bailey seconded, authorizing the addition of five community garden plots for a total of fifteen plots for the 2011 season. Motion passed 5/0. CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES September 27, 2010 Page 6 of 13 & PLANNING Commissioner Ruoff stated he was not able to attend the September 21, 2010, Planning Commission meeting so he asked Director Nielsen to report on the public forum held about the no-right-turn restriction out of the CUB Foods parking lot. Mayor Liz6e asked about the feedback the City received about t`l e restriction. Director Nielsen stated everyone within one thousand feet received a notice. Nielsen st4ted'a number of people at the meeting provided comment. The Commission does not think the restriction is effective and didn't appear there is enforcement. Residents conveyed the restriction ends,up causing traffic to build u the southerly entrance. Director Nielsen stated the Commission agreed to discuss whet*or not a stop light on Eureka Road and State Highway 7 is warranted. It also plans-to discuss the alignineo', Country Club Road, Yellowstone Trail and Lake Linden Drive in terms of traff lc'wolume. The Commission was surprised to learn the daily traffic counts are down by about one thousarid, s1r.9m the pre CUB , construction, noting there are still about four thousand trips per day on th&',', r. Mayor Liz6e assumed staffi11 inv olve the of Transportation (MnDOT) in inneso a 6 0, discussions about the interse I if fg, h ighway 7 and - 41 Arid the intersection of Eureka Road and Highway 7. She asked L466tor Bro and Director Nielsen to arrange for MnDOT representatives to be " a invo N i e I s e n e x p I a14)" �" d T'th e I Os a stop light &Eure k Road did not meet the warrants based on the number of cars. since the but traf cdikot§ h ave been done for the Eureka Road intersection - iY,"'.' were cut off on the westerly side. Director Nielsen stated traffic 't kro ow to evaluate the accident information that MnDOT has. Director fftft, a explainer , to , dft,signa 1 attempted 'g"�"" Z' City asked MnD,0,TTg to Chanhassen that Miffiel-M R Eureka Road carries, intersection of Church RJ( af after the access closures were implemented the City of Chanhassen ;tific' , ion at the intersection of Minnewashta Parkway and Highway 7. The ;ide�' Ahe Eureka Road intersection as well at that time. MnDOT informed "'ita Parkway, which carries much more traffic on the Chanhassen side than not meet the warrants for justification. Mayor Liz6e recommended the and Highway 7 also be considered. In response to a question from Councilmember Turgeon, Commissioner Ruoff stated the Commission conducted development site visits a number of weeks ago. The Commission plans to visit the Smithtown Crossing area in October. 9. ENGINEERING/PUBLIC WORKS A. Star Lane and Star Circle Street Improvement Project CITY E SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTE September 27, 2€ 1 Page 7 of t sche Landini stated Staff is asking Council to approve the feasibility report, provide direction on sh public hearing for special assessments • consider the"01WK main extension and to accept the petition from resi dents opposed ct He noted.49 o acc e pting the rep e In response to a comment from Councilmember Turg& does not identify the need for any easements for the road Brown stated the mitigation of drainage issues may nec the drainage aspect of the design process will y be lengthy. 111 In response to a comment from Councilmember Ze driving surface for both roadways will be 24 feet four feet to the width. Zerby stated because the roar Star Circle is 180 feet long) it does not make serif they are. He suggested the new dnving surface be Council should decide sf ,lt wants 16 °allow on -st roadway narrower than what is proposed. Zerby surmountable curb is install because at can be p: Wedgwood Drive as it has parking issues even thol this evening. stated report )ortion of the,. , pr Director easements. Brown then stated ,ngineer Landinf stated the improved width of the edge,control. He�said edge control adds another ire not very long (Star Lane is 750 feet long an tim to rehabilitate them to something wider than der than Z-2 feet. Councilmember Turgeon stated larking before it makes a decision to make the d parking would not be much of an issue if a or : I urgeon encouraged Zerby to go and look at a 24- foot -wide driving surface. Councilmetnlier Baile Brown and Engineer Landini explain the rational for roadways and` the Director Brownexplained Council established a goal that roadways with a Pavement Surface Evaluation and Rating S em (PASER) of less than 4 would be considered for reconstruction or reclam ys; ation. He said that sealcoa`ttng ,,and overlaying of roads helps maintain the roadways but they don't extend the life of the roadway. Star CiWe and star Lane have a rating of 3 on a scale of 1 to 10. There are about 12 City z�t roadways with a ratinadlow. . The reclamation process assumes there are good soils under the roadway. It involves grinding up the °existing surface and mixing it with the existing base then putting down a 2- 3 inch thick layer of bituminous. The expected life of a reclaimed roadway is 10 years. The expected life o a reconstructed roadway is 30 — 40 years. The cost to reclaim a roadway is about 35 percent of the cost to reconstruct a roadway. A roadway has to be reconstructed if water main is to be extended. Mayor Lizee noted there are poor sub soils under Star Circle and Star Lane and there are drainage issues. In response to a question from Councilmember Turgeon, Director Brown explained current technology allows sewer issues to be addressed as part of a reclamation process. The exception to that would be if the sewer line is severely damaged. CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES September 27, 2010 Page 8 of 1 13 Councilmember Woodruff stated he thought it would be more appropriate to discuss reclamation versus reconstruction after the design phase of the project has been completed. Stormwater management issues will factor into the decision. It's his understanding that drainage issues in this area can be addressed as part of either a reclamation or reconstruction. Director Brown confirmed that. In response to a comment by Councilmember Bailey, Director Brown explained the property assessment would be for water main, extension only. Mr. Karas went on to state he thought a mill and overlay with th6 correct sloping df'fhe 'roadway to disburse stormwater is fine for 75 — 85 percent of the roadway. Star J' ane is able to handle almost all of the snow melt. The property owners at his end of the cul-de 4d &�11ot want to have Star Lane disturbed. A mill and overlay would suffice for them, There are roadway§' ifi worse shape than Star Lane and the City's money could be put to better use on s I e other roadway. ­ are 15 abutting properties on Star Lane, there is minimal traffic, and there are fi0,,., issues. If the f� width -of Star Circle is increased, it Q will take away some driveway and property so' 6 -6f -the property owners. One of the driveways is already a short driveway and 6 feet of it would b lost. AN6,"increasing` the size will not allow a refuse hauler truck to make the circle,' Star Lane has a bi circle and if SO'* of that is lost it will create problems for large trucks. Nick Pachm4yer, 5655�,Stg. stated he is speaking for the owners of the properties abu Star Circle. He asked how much slv face mill be taken on Stai"tircle to widen the area. He stated he lives on the northwest comer of the 6' 11U,�, 6 'e. has extensive landscaping and an irrigation system. All of 7 j his neighbor's property. He asked if the roadway is p§,,up on iffi�4� the snow mc4,­,*0,',,'q 0,r Circle" "o reclaimed . ­ it meathat water maul will not be extended and stormwater improvements will not be made. Nfayor Liz6e stated wafter main er mn-04_1, not be extended if the roadway is reclaimed. Mr. Pachmayer , asked� ht't ithe process is for , m4,,kmg the dec ision on how to improve the roadway. Liz e explained that `,, this evenin'giCouncil has to d6dide if it ,wants to schedule a public hearing about assessments for water main extensionrand after that is hel Council will decide on what the scope of the design work should be. Mr. Pachmayer th sWecl as,k:property owner he signed a petition against having any rehabilitation of Star Circle done. H& �*_ ,ug It the roadway is fine; the access in and out is fine. A reclamation or _ reconstruction would caii undue stress to the property owners. He could potentially lose 4 — 6 feet of his newly installed drivewd ` I . He explained he appreciated the goal to do all utility work at the time of a reconstruction effort. He asked what the City tells property owners who have taken it upon themselves to ensure their well water is fit for their families. He stated he bought his property knowing he only had well water and the roadway ended in a cul-de-sac. He understands it's his responsibility to cap the well should it go dry or not longer be used. Mayor Liz6e stated the City has no responsibility for private wells. CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR ULA NCIL MEETING MINUTES September 27, 2010 Page 9 of 13 if a public e n " sh 7_ I 'i# ild Rose were reconstructed occur after the p ublic t t d esign w is Councilmember Zerby clarified if water main were to' b hook up to city water. A hook -up at the curb will be instal Councilmember Woodruff reiterated Director Brown's the property owners. Mathew Tift 5695 Star Lane stated he was the;newe present because he had his well tested and the level of stated he is pro city water, but,theroadway is not "an i lot of filtration systems also commeu have two young children though & have a revers him. He encouraged Council to hold a public hearing c for city stated she owners to what costs would be assessed to ,property owner 6 the street. He explained he is sghfc m the water is higher than the threshold. He ue for hirer either way. He commented there are a i he and his wife work out of their home and they osmosis system the arsenic level is bothersome to sessment for city water. operty for 19 years. She expressed her support in her water is off the charts. feedback this evening. �v Councilm"br Bailey asked Dir €ctor Brown if it's his experience that when there are bad sub soils that the City could get pnto a situation where it wishes the sub soils hadn't been dug up. Brown explained that soil borings are fallom samples ,of what the sub soils are like. Borings are taken every 500 feet or so. It's not very often that theCity w>les it didn't open up a roadway. The last time was before he started and h the project was when Clovmgon Road was reconstructed. He thought the sub soils under Star Circle and Star Lane are fairly unifotr. Councilmember Bailey asked why the roadways are rated a 3 when they are not rubble. Director Brown explained a lot of work went into patching the roadways. He thought if nothing is done the condition will be the same as before the patching in five years. Bailey moved, Woodruff seconded, Adopting RESOLUTION NO. 10 -045 "A Resolution Approving Feasibility Report on Proposed Improvements and Setting Public Hearing Date City Project 11 -01 Star Lane and Star Circle Road Rehabilitation Project." crry OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINU'rES September 27, 2010 Page 10 of 13 Councilmernber Bailey clarified this is just the next step in the process. There seems to be sufficient reason to take the next step. Councilmember Bailey asked Staff to come to the public would be an appropriate step so the property owners I asked Staff to project graphics and highlights of the r Turgeon requested Staff clearly explain the options avait 10. GENERAL/NEW BUSINESS "h d District Citizen A. Minnehaha Creek Waters Appointment fared to layput the case for why this explanation. Cqu Zerby the public hearihg ' Councilmember Committee Representative Administrator Heck explained the Minnehaha Ofeek W96rshed,,District (MCWD) is in the process of reviewing and amending its stormwater management rut'. One"6f.the committees the MCWD uses during such a process is a Citizen A`dvi t�—Committee (CAC). The MCWD has asked interested parties to serve on the CAC. The Council" esn't a p` 0� t anyone to th -1 40 , e CAC but it can recommend someone to serve. Mayor Lize'e and interested recommei4 .1publishjn Report -4-informa ion ahoti 'the CAC in the Shore Repo residents can submit a letter o Merest to tl e City'Engineer Landini clarified that a resident would still need to apply he W D. L ated let residents know that the MCWD is looking for --t v citizens tOe invol , in terested parties can apply to the MCWD directly. i f rocess pd in er Supporting 'Ma Legislation Providing for Changes in Distribution of Fine Revenue for Aquatic lio*ive Species (AIS) Citations Administrator IT " 'ck, stated they Minnetonka Conservation District (LMCD) recently adopted a resolution requestirig",.Kia-.changes - to legislation regarding the distribution of fine revenue from aquatic invasive species (AI S )Zitatiofi§. The resolution asks that all fine revenue go to the local law enforcement 7 agency issuing the citation her than to the State. The thought is if more of the fine revenue goes to local agencies there will be Fiore incentive to issue citations. The LMCD has forwarded the resolution it adopted on to the LMCD member cities and asked them to consider adopting a similar resolution. Staff recommends Council adopt the resolution and then forward it to the State senator and representative. Councilmember Zerby asked what the amounts of the fines are. Administrator Heck stated it varies based on the offense but he was not sure of the various fine amounts. Councilmember Woodruff stated the fine for one infraction is $500. Zerby asked what the fine is for transporting a boat on public roadways with the drain plug still in the boat. Woodruff stated he did not know the answer, noting the fine amounts are set in State Statute. ITT OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINU September 27, 201 Page t t of 13 Councilmember Zerby questioned if the fine revenue received will offset the cost of the South Lake Minnetonka Police Department's (SLMPD) costs. Councilmember Turgeon asked who in the SLMPD is trained to issue AIS citations. Mayor Lizee stated all patrol officers are. Councilmember Woodruff stated all local law enforcement agencies have adequate training to enforce the law. In response to a question from Councilmember Turgeon, Councilmember Woodruff stated the LMCD AIS Task Force made a recommendation to the LMCD Board to adopt the resolution and the Board did that. Councilmember Turgeon stated she has a feeling that this is a , .kne'p7ierk reaction because Lake 11 Minnetonka became infested with zebra muscles. The SLMPD say, s it's understaffed and this would add to the workload. She wondered if it would better for Howard's'Point Farina: to purchase additional policing services from the SLMPD, similar to what Maynard's:'.I2estaurant and ,$ iew do, to inspect boats as they come out of the Lake. She thought the Marina owners should share rn the responsibility. She wanted to have more information before she is ready to,consider the resolution. Councilmember Bailey asked if the intent is to motivate the SLMPD =tb `engage in addition" al enforcement thereby incentivising them to not do other things. If this involvesthe SLMPD patrol officers periodically driving by a boat launch as part of a routine patrol and the3i'f e the time to issue a citation that's probably not an issue. He questioned if it *60d be a good use of �resources to dedicate officers to the launch sites. Councilmember Woodruff stated the LMCD AIS Task Force and LMCD Board had extensive discussion about resources consumed versus revenue earned 'Those °involved think the lack of opportunity to receive C. mmercial Trash Container Screening Councilmember Woodngff stated' he and Director Nielsen have been discussing a situation where one of the commercial estabTi .hments in the City has its dumpster located in the front of the establishment near the street. He suggested Council direct Staff and the Planning Commission to review the City's Ordinance to determine if the Ordinance should be amended to address the issue of lack of screening of commercial trash containers. Director Nielsen explained during the site plan review of commercial property Staff ensures there will be adequate screening of trash containers or that they will be located inside. Unfortunately, the property being discussed is an existing business and no site plan review was required. Nielsen indicated there is no provision in City Ordinance to require screening of commercial trash containers. If Council so chooses, the Planning Commission can hold a public hearing on a draft amendment for including such a provision and make a recommendation to Council. CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES September 27, 2010 Page 12 of 1 Mayor Lizde asked if the property owner is amenable to moving the durapster, Director Nielsen explained he has been talking to them about this for about three months. The property owner did move it to a different location but the refuse hauler did not like the new location. There was consensus to have Staff and the Planning Commission draft an amendment to the City Ordinance to include a provision requiring commercial trash containers to be screened. 11. STAFF AND COUNCIL REPORTS A. Administrator and Staff Administrator Heck stated the lease on the City -owned house current tenant would like to extend the lease for one more year to. He then stated the improvements to the shelter in Manor everyone who helped install the boundless playground in Manor of Women Voters is hosting a Shorewood candidate forum on C 9:00 PM. Mayor Lizde noted the Lake Minnetonka,"Commi meeting. Councilmember Woodruff stated he sent Staff an email property. Administrator Heck explained the Building 1 detached garage repaired. 1. Financial Report — A Director DeJong stated the meeting packet thought this year's budget is in�iod s_ ape. Councilmember Bailey a ked Directixe DeJong to future budgets. Mayor Lizee recessed the,meetmg at 9_:00 Mayor Other Staff=R:enorts �s`; at„the end of April 2011. The did not think there is a reason not are near. completion, He thanked He noted the: -South Tonka League 4, 2010, at City Hall from 7:00 — ons Commission .will .record the damage to the garage doors on the )rking on getting the doors on the August 2010 financial report. He time thinking about how to calendarize Director Nielsen% =staffed this pgst` weekend was the first weekend of the 2010 deer removal program. Preliminary counts indicate five,- were removed. There will be two removal weekends in October and another one in Noveni B. Mayor and City Council Councilmember Bailey stated he attended an Excelsior Fire District (EFD) Board meeting on September 22, 2010. The Board adopted the 2011 budget that was approved by the five member cities. There was a great deal of discussion about the required contribution to the Excelsior Firefighters Relief Association (EFRA) pension fund. The estimated required contribution for 2011 is $35,000 more than the amount provided for in the adopted budget. The required contribution will continue to be an issue for a number of years. CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUT ES September 27, 2010 Page 13 of 13 In response to a comment from Councilmember Turgeon, Councilmember Bailey explained the EFRA must file its forms with the State by the end of July, He noted the EFRA can file an amended form at the end of 201 but it can't do that in future years. In response to a another comment from Councilmember Turgeon, Administrator Heck explained the timeline for adopting the EFD budget is driven by the need for the EFD member cities to have the budget set before the cities have to certify their maximum levy with Hennepin County in September. The reporting requirement for EFRA is a separate item, Councilmember Turgeon stated it would be helpful to have more realistic contribution numbers. Councilmember Turgeon stated that in July she forwarded to Staff a drainage concern she heard about from a resident, Mr. Fox, on Edgewood Road and she hasn't heard back from ,' Staff on this item. Mayor Liz6e stated she has spoken with Mr. Fox, who lives on Howard's Point Road. Before the drai issue can be resolved on Edgewood Drive two property owners have to be willing to grant easement, Councilmember Turgeon stated the City has a drainage, issue near Covington Road "The' City has a 20- foot easement. It's her understanding the City wan a s oot easement and the city pd s to remove about 140 yards of sediment out of the culvert. She Qft&ft the culverts are, , She suggested Council discuss culvert maintenance at some futu ei Councilmember Woodruff agreed with the maintenance comment. Turgeon asked why the City needs ' ,50-foot easement versus the 20-foot easement it already has. Councilmember Bailey !,, the outl6t the lake and it is land locked. It has no value with Hennepin County and it is no Councilmember Woodruff stated 2010. A more thorough assessm,c, M Lake Minnetonka. A lot more,'JUV1 north end of Big Island. T o adi Watershed District is rn 3 atiin g all I Mayor Liz6e reminded resi scheduled fmi r..3( Excelsior Fire District F "d — 8 30 & P1VI. She then state,( new -­ new,lfldVground on October [IPA Turgeon moved, 2 2010, at 9:15 P.M. Christine Freeman, Recorder ATTEST: the LMCD Al 1, S Task F I 6rc I ' , �)has a meeting scheduled for October 8, it was done by er of age4ics of the zebra muscle situation in ni1e, zebra muscles have been found and there is a higher density on the It 4nuscles have al een found. He then stated the Minnehaha Creek LkAfibre residents a 1etter,about zebra muscles. theta us a, community meeting about the new Excelsior Library 06V "'the Southshore Community Center. She stated the Open House and Safety Fair is scheduled for October 7 `i' from 6:00 1 be an Open House at Manor Park for the refurbished shelter and 16-00 A.M. — Noon. , Adjourning the City Council Regular Meeting of September 27, 15/0. Christine Liz6e, Mayor Brian Heck, City Administrator/Clerk COUNCIL ACTION FORM Claims for council authorization. The attached claims list includes checks numbered 50634 through 50701 totaling $539,692.89. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the claims list. 1 ?/2010 i _1.:37 AM /' HISTORY CL EC7 ?E OR.T JENDOi "r. 01 r -,.; 000000 12,035.76 :;ANK: LEACON BANE: 2,151.38 DATE :?. NGE: 1/281/2011 1."HRL 99/'9/g999 050635 1,358.55 050636 CHECK VENDOR Z.D. NAME STATUS DATE 00051 EFTPS - FEDERAL W/H D 9/28/2010 00092 MN DEPT OF REVENUE D 9/28/2010 20005 WELLS FARGO HEALTH BENEFIT SVC D 9/28/2010 00053 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST - 302131 -4 R 9/28/2010 16625 MINN NCPERS GROUP LIFE INS R 9/28/2010 00052 PERA R 9/28/2010 15885 MIDWEST MAILING SYSTEMS INC R 10/11/2010 1.0576 ADVANCED IMAGING SOLUTIONS INC R 10/11/2010 00087 AFSCME CO 5 MEMBERS HEALTH FUN R 10/11/2010 29306 ALLIED WASTE SERVICES #894 R 10/11/2010 01475 AMERICAN ENGINEERING R 10/11/2010 162'75 AMERICAN MESSAGING R 10/11/2010 01977 ANDERSON, XRTSTI B. R 10/11/2010 1 ANDRE BOON R 10/11/2010 29223 AUTO ELECTRIC SPECIALISTS, INC R 10/11/2010 29338 BLANCHARD CATERING, INC. R 10/11/2010 03243 BNR IRRIGATION SERVICES, INC. R 10/11/2010 17300 CENTERPOINT ENERGY R 10/11/2010 07600 CITY OF EXCELSIOR R 10/11/2010 22820 CITY OF SHOREWOOD R 10/11/2010 05305 COMMUNITY REC RESOURCES R 10/11/2010 05345 CONNEY SAFETY PRODUCTS R 10/11/2010 INVOICE AMOUNT DISCOUNT PAGE: 2 .__i ,CK CHECK CHECK NO STATUS AMOUNT 000000 12,035.76 000000 2,151.38 000000 985.60 050635 1,358.55 050636 32.00 050637 6,501.09 050639 1,538.80 050640 67.00 050641 357.00 050642 13,840.20 050643 3,134.60 050644 17.96 050645 325.00 050646 2,245.32 050647 23.42 050648 349.23 050649 778.55 050650 236.99 050651 5,505.75 050652 1,422.72 050653 6,124.50 050654 87.74 10/07/2010 1 ._:37 AM -.S TCiR.Y CH C- REPOR'-° BEACON tSdG -: 99/99/999 - SVOIr^ CuECK CITE CA CHECK AMOUNT DISCOUNT NO STATUS A40UN'[' 050655 31.99 050656 107.04 050657 621.08 050658 9.85 050659 175.00 050660 107.00 050661 142,685.57 050662 344.40 050663 91.71 050664 60.00 050665 423.73 050666 145.00 050667 7,168.00 050668 7,400.00 050669 69.95 050670 13,398.92 050671 4,158.00 050672 47,027.65 050673 13,581.00 050674 351.92 050675 2,108.00 050676 80.00 CHECK VENDOR l.D. NAME STATUS DATE 05885 CULLIGAN BOTTLED WATER R 10 /11/2010 06350 DAVIS, CHARLES R 1.0/1'1/2010 29363 DeJONG, BRUCE R 10/11/2010 26110 DEX R 10/11/2010 29366 ECM PUBLISHERS, INC. R 10/11/2010 07383 ELECTRICAL INSTALLATION & MAIN R 10/11/2010 07653 EXCELSIOR FIRE DISTRICT R 10/11/2010 08500 FRONTIER PRECISION, INC. R 10/11/2010 09395 GOPHER SIGN COMPANY R 10/11/2010 07900 HAWKINS, INC. R 10/11/2010 10503 HENN CTY TREAS.- TAXPYER SVCS D R 10 /11 /2010 29222 IPMA -HR R 10/11/2010 12475 KUSSKE CONSTRUCTION, INC R 10/11/2010 29367 LARRY KERBER R 10/11/2010 21340 LOCAL LINK R 10/11/2010 00079 MEDICA R 10/11/2010 15501 METRO COUNCIL ENV.(SAC) R 10/11/2010 15500 METRO COUNCIL ENVMT(WASTEWATER R 10/11/2010 15800 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP. R 10/11/2010 15885 MIDWEST MAILING SYSTEMS INC R 10/11/2010 17050 MN DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH R 10/11/2010 19445 NGUYEN, MICHELLE R 10/11/2010 - SVOIr^ CuECK CITE CA CHECK AMOUNT DISCOUNT NO STATUS A40UN'[' 050655 31.99 050656 107.04 050657 621.08 050658 9.85 050659 175.00 050660 107.00 050661 142,685.57 050662 344.40 050663 91.71 050664 60.00 050665 423.73 050666 145.00 050667 7,168.00 050668 7,400.00 050669 69.95 050670 13,398.92 050671 4,158.00 050672 47,027.65 050673 13,581.00 050674 351.92 050675 2,108.00 050676 80.00 C/07/2010 1.7..:;7 AM A/P FISTORY JENO P ...:: U1 ( - z rieoc NO STATUS AMOUNT S3AN ._ tiE1AC'ON DANK 38.00 AT: - NGE, 9 0 1 'H.R'7 Il 9/99/. 99 050679 777.02 050680 CHECK VENDOR -.D. NAME STATUS DATE 19500 NIELSEN, BRADLEY R 10/11/2010 15900 OFFICE DEPOT R 10/11/2010 29332 ON SITE SANITATION INC R 10/11/2010 15000 PAETEC R 10/11/20 1 PERNSTEINER CREATIVE GROUP R 10/11/2010 20750 PIPE SERVICES CORPORATION R 10/11/2010 20950 POTTS, KENNETH N. R 10/11/2010 292.51 PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL GROUP R 10/11/2010 21400 PURCHASE POWER R 10/11/2010 26100 QWEST R 10/11/2010 22950 SHOREWOOD TRUE VALUE R 10/11/2010 23500 SO LK MTKA POLICE DEPT R 10/11/2010 23725 SPEEDWAY SUPERAMERICA LLC R 10 /11./2010 29101 SUN NEWSPAPERS R 10/11/2010 23726 TKDA ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS PLAN R 10/11/2010 25000 TOTAL PRINTING SERVICES R 10/11/2010 25452 TWIN CITY WATER CLINIC R 10/11/2010 00085 UNUM LIFE INSURANCE CO R 10/11/2010 70200 VERIZON WIRELESS R 10/11/2010 29269 WARNER CONNECT R 10/11/2010 83900 WASTE MANAGEMENT OF WI -MN R 10/11/2010 18500 WM. MUELLER & SONS, INC. R 10/11/2010 IN'JOICF; AMOUNT D =SCGt.TiTT PACE: CHECK CHECK CHECK NO STATUS AMOUNT 050677 38.00 050678 141.71 050679 777.02 050680 527.31 050681 822.29 050682 14,121.55 050683 2,291.66 050684 765.68 050685 39.99 050686 310.20 050687 159.64 050688 135,846.00 050689 2,025.12 050690 129.38 050691 6,402.54 050692 1,167.52 050693 100.00 050694 1,151.39 050695 213.73 050696 5,949.72 050697 489.70 050698 4.303.60 10/07/x010 1 .3'7 AD H151ORY C'.' C C REPORT PAGE: BANR.. ... DEACON SANE DATE [ -IG`:: 9/28/2 0 HR- VENDOR I.D. NAME 28350 WOODRUFF, RICHARD 19800 XCEL ENERGY Ci 1ECK INJOICW CHECK CHECK CHECK STATUS DATE AMOUNT" DISCOUNT NO STATUS AMOUNT R 10/1.1 /2.010 050699 32.00 R 10 /11/2010 050700 7.1,313.46 * T 0 T A L S * * NO CHECK AMOUNT DISCOUNTS TOTAL APPLIED REGULAR CHECKS: 65 473,211.44 0.00 473,211.44 HAND CHECKS: 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 DRAFTS: 3 15,172.74 0.00 15,172.74 EFT: 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 NON CHECKS: 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 VOID CHECKS: 0 VOID DEBITS 0.00 VOID CREDITS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 TOTAL ERRORS: 0 VENDOR SET: 01 BANK: 1 TOTALS: 68 488,384.18 0.00 488,384.18 BANK: 1 TOTALS: 68 488,384.18 0.00 488,384.18 REPORT TOTALS: 70 488,384.18 0.00 488,384.18 i0 ",7_2010 1 1 AM C -' 0 U N C ' L 'REPORT BY VETJi L'OR - OCTOs '_ _i_:_, 2010 ;. G, VENDOR SO R"' {F; }' DATE, L 4CR_Ii _G`•! %O3gD A-, PART fEN ,' _.. '�MOU "i' AD9FN`7O IMAG ING SOLUTIONS "NC l0/1_ / " 1 i+iF� i D. `I �. ^ E J_._C9 /1� Ge e -'a Lund 4unic ir,)ul Bt' di nqs _... 7 00 TOTAL: 67.00 A.F.SCME CO S MEMBERS HEAI_TFi FUND 10 /1_1 /10 OCT -UNION DENTAL TREE General Fund Una- .located Expenses 1 3' 7 .00 _ TOTAL: 357.00 ALLIED WASTE SERVICES 1894 10/11/10 OCT RECYCLING SVC Recycling Utility Recycling _ 13,840.2 TOTAL: 13,840.20 AMERICAN ENGINEERING 10 /11 /10 NELSON DR & WILDROSE LN Street Capital imp Street Capt Improvemen 3,134.60 TOTAL: 3,134.60 AMERICAN MESSAGING 10 /11 /10 OCT PAGERS General Fund Public Works 8.98 10 /11 /10 OCT PAGERS Water Utility Water 4.49 10 /11 /10 OCT PAGERS Sanitary Sewer Uti Sewer 4.49 TOTAL: 17.96 ANDERSON, KRISTI B. 10 /11 /10 TULIP INS CERT FOR OKTOBER Southshore Communi Senior Community Cente _ 325.00 TOTAL: 325.00 AUTO ELECTRIC SPECIALISTS, INC. 10 /11 /10 BERING General Fund Public Works 23.42 TOTAL: 23.42 BLANCHARD CATERING, INC. 10/11/10 SSCC -FOODS FOR CARGILL 09/ Southshore Communi Senior Community Cents _ 349.23 TOTAL: 349.23 BNR IRRIGATION SERVICES, INC. 10 /11 /10 SAN SEWER REP XCEL CTR Sanitary Sewer Uti Sewer _ 778.55 TOTAL: 778.55 CENTERPOINT ENERGY 10/11/10 SVC 8/19 -9/20 General Fund Municipal Buildings 22.88 10/11/10 SVC 8/19 -9/20 General Fund Public Works 77.52 10/11/10 SVC 8/19 -9/20 General Fund Parks & Recreation 28.77 10 /11 /10 SSCC 06/17 -07/22 Southshore Communi Senior Community Cents 40.85 10/11/10 SVC 8/19 -9/20 Water Utility Water 20.12 10/11/10 SVC 8/19 -9/20 Water Utility Water 46.85 TOTAL: 236.99 CITY OF EXCELSIOR 10/11/10 3RD QTR WATER CONNECTION F Water Utility Water _ 5,505.75 TOTAL: 5,505.75 CITY OF SHOREWOOD 10/11/10 SSCC - UTILITY PAYMENT Southshore Communi Senior Community Cente 1,422.72 TOTAL: 1,422.72 COMMUNITY REC RESOURCES 10 /11 /10 SVC 09/27 -10/08 PCS General Fund Parks & Recreation 2,160.00 10 /11 /10 SVC 9/23 -10/07 SSSCC ASSIS Southshore Communi Senior Community Cents 214.50 10/11/10 4TH QTR SSCC MANAGEMENT Southshore Communi Senior Community Cente 3,750.00 TOTAL: 6,124.50 CONNEY SAFETY PRODUCTS 10 /11 /10 SAFETY GLOVES Sanitary Sewer Uti Sewer 87.74 TOTAL: 87.74 CULLIGAN BOTTLED WATER 10 /11 /10 DRINKING WATER SVC General Fund Municipal Buildings _ 31.99 TOTAL: 31.99 DAVIS, CHARLES 10 /11 /10 BOOTS General Fund Public Works 107.04 TOTAL: 107.04 07 20 '_0 i3 1?M, u _, C __ N C _ R} Oiu' tj g;NDOE< - OCTOBER 201.0 "AC 2 'v ENLC1 SO ' i r E�y F, 7 SC_Zf i' "i ON FUN?i it T'Al L�. i,`•iCiuT,. ... - . DEX 1,),/ 1 1 0 ySCC -SEPT ADS Southsho; e Commun: Seni.o C'ommu r. Cente 9 8 TOTAL. 9 .85 DeSONG, BRUCE 10 /1I /10 GFOA CONF 09/21 -09/23 -MILE General. Fund Finance 144.50 10/11/10 GFOA CONF 09 /21-09 /23 -EXP General Fund Finance 476.58 TOTAL: 621.08 ECM PUBLISHERS, INC. 10/11/10 SO LK- EXCELSIOR CHAMBER Southshore Communi Senior Community Cente -_ 175.00 TOTAL: 175.00 EFTPS - FEDERAL W/H 9/28/10 FEDERAL W/H General Fund NON - DEPARTMENTAL 4,504.20 9/28/10 FICA W/H General Fund NON - DEPARTMENTAL 3,051.99 9/28/10 MEDICARE W/H General Fund NON - DEPARTMENTAL 713.79 9/28/10 FICA W/H General Fund Council 80.60 9/28/10 MEDICARE W/H General Fund Council 18.87 9/28/10 FICA W/H General Fund Administration 259.38 9/28/10 MEDICARE W/H General Fund Administration 60.67 9/28/10 FICA W/H General Fund General Government 300.66 9/28/10 MEDICARE W/H General Fund General Government 70.32 9/28/10 FICA W/H General Fund Elections 88.90 9/28/10 MEDICARE W/H Ceneral Fund Elections 20.77 9/28/10 FICA W/H General Fund Finance 284.32 9/28/10 MEDICARE W/H General Fund Finance 66.49 9/28/10 FICA W/H General Fund Planning 283.37 9/28/10 MEDICARE W/H General Fund Planning 66.26 9/28/10 FICA W/H General Fund Protective Inspect.i.ons 184.05 9/28/10 MEDICARE W/H General Fund Protective Inspections 43.06 9/28/10 FICA W/H General Fund City Engineer 182.25 9/28/10 MEDICARE W/H General Fund City Engineer 42.62 9/28/10 FICA W/H General Fund Public Works 424.52 9/28/10 MEDICARE W/H General Fund Public Works 99.29 9/28/10 FICA W/H General Fund Streets & Roadways 91.84 9/28/10 MEDICARE W/H General Fund Streets & Roadways 21.49 9/28/10 FICA W/H General Fund Sanitation /Weeds /Waste 31.06 9/28/10 MEDICARE W/H General Fund Sanitation /Weeds /Waste 7.26 9/28/10 FICA W/H General Fund Tree Maintenance 56.38 9/28/10 MEDICARE. W/H General Fund Tree Maintenance 13.18 9/28/10 FICA W/H General Fund Parks & Recreation 415.14 9/28/10 MEDICARE W/H General Fund Parks & Recreation 97.10 9/28/10 FICA W/H Southshore Communi Senior Community Cents 31.19 9/28/10 MEDICARE W/H Southshore Communi Senior Community Cents 7.29 9/28/10 FICA W/H Water Utility Water 146.56 9/28/10 MEDICARE W/H Water Utility Water 34.28 9/28/10 FICA W/H Sanitary Sewer Uti Sewer 109.96 9/28/10 MEDICARE W/H Sanitary Sewer Uti Sewer 25.72 9/28/10 FICA W/H Recycling Utility Recycling 6.19 9/28/10 MEDICARE W/H Recycling Utility Recycling 1.45 9/28/10 FICA W/H Stormwater Managem STORMWATER MANAGEMENT 75.62 9/28/10 MEDICARE W/H Stormwater Managem STORMWATER MANAGEMENT 17 .67 TOTAL: 12,035.76 ELECTRICAL INSTALLATION & MAINTENANCE 10 /11 /10 SIGNAL RELAMP General Fund Traffic Control /Str Li 107.00 TOTAL: 107.00 EXCELSIOR FIRE DISTRICT 10/11/10 OPERATIONS General Fund Fire Protection 74,528.33 10 /11 /10 BUILDINGS General Fund Fire Protection 68,157.24 6 _0'? 2 0 1 U 1 - �.1 icy; r - v 1 ,R'i IY VENDOR - ;CTOd �. EIHD >.i, S01t ' DA E i ESC., .:i.ON FJiv :; i).,..'7.R Eli _ - -.. -.. -. AMOUN' 'IOTA ":: 142, 685 . b7 FRONTIER PRECISION, INC. 10/11/10 BATTEk1ES & CHARGERS General Fund City Engineer _ 3 44 . 40 TOTAL 344.40 GOPHER SIGN COMPANY 10/11/10 COMMUNITY GARDEN SIGNS General Fund Parks & Recreation 91.'7 TOTAL: 91.71 HAWKINS, INC. 10/11/10 CHLORINE Water Utility Water 60.00 TOTAL: 60.00 HENN CTY TREAS.- TAXPYER SVCS DIVISION 10 /11/10 3311723130012 -5620 CO RD N Stormwater Managem STORMWATER MANAGEMENT 423.73 TOTAL: 423.73 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST - 302131 -457 9/28/10 P/R DEDUCTS - DEFERRED COM General Fund NON - DEPARTMENTAL 1,025.00 9/28/10 P/R DEDUCTS- DEFERRED COM General Fund NON- DEPARTMENTAL 333.55 TOTAL: 1,358.55 IPMA -HR 10/11/10 BRIAN HECK - MEMBERSHIP General Fund Administration _ 145.00 TOTAL: 145.00 KUSSKE CONSTRUCTION, INC 10 /11 /10 SAN SEWER REP XCEL CTR Sanitary Sewer Uti Sewer 7,168.0 TOTAL: 7,168.00 LARRY KERBER 10/11/10 S LVERWOOD PARK - REMOVE CUR Park Capital Impro Park Capital Improveme 2,950.00 10/11/10 MANOR PARK - REMOVE BLACKTOP Park Capital Impro Park Capital Improveme 4, 450.00 TOTAL: 7,400.00 LOCAL LINK 10/11/10 OCT WEBLINK SVC General Fund Municipal Buildings 69.95 TOTAL: 69.95 MEDICA 10 /11 /10 OCT MEDICAL PREM General Fund Unallocated Expenses 13,398.92 TOTAL: 13,398.92 METRO COUNCIL ENV.(SAC) 10 /11 /10 AUG SAC REPORT Sanitary Sewer Uti NON- DEPARTMENTAL 4,158.00 TOTAL: 4,158.00 METRO COUNCIL ENVMT(WASTEWATER) 10 /11 /10 OCT WASTEWATER SVC Sanitary Sewer Uti Sewer 47,027.65 TOTAL: 47,027.65 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP. 10 /11 /10 HAUL SWEEPING & DISPOSAL General Fund Streets & Roadways 9,000.00 10 /11 /10 HAUL SWEEPING & DISPOSAL Stormwater Managem STORMWATER MANAGEMENT __ 4,58 TOTAL: 13,581.00 MIDWEST MAILING SYSTEMS INC 10 /11 /10 OCT NEWSLETTER SVC General Fund General Government 351.92 10 /11 /10 3RD QTR UTILITY POSTAGE Water Utility Water 299.70 10 /11 /10 3RD QTR UTILITY POSTAGE Water Utility Water 85.00 10 /11 /10 3RD QTR UTILITY POSTAGE Sanitary Sewer Uti Sewer 299.70 10 /11 /10 3RD QTR UTILITY POSTAGE Sanitary Sewer Uti Sewer 85.00 10/11/10 3RD QTR UTILITY POSTAGE Recycling Utility Recycling 299.70 10 /11 /10 3RD QTR UTILITY POSTAGE Recycling Utility Recycling 85.00 10 /11 /10 3RD QTR UTILITY POSTAGE Stormwater Managem STORMWATER MANAGEMENT 299.70 10 /11 /10 3RD QTR UTILITY POSTAGE Stormwater Managem STORMWATER MANAGEMENT _ _ 85.00 TOTAL: 1,890.72 MISC. VENDOR ANDRE BOON 10 /11 /10 MANOR PARK BLDG PROPOSAL P Park Capital Impro Park Capital Improveme 2,245.32 10 - 07 201 1 3'. AM . P c r - r UO T D YENDOR ocTOhL2 - 20 10 PAGE 4 VENTAO. ,'i i�dr t SO PI DATE D1 Scx::Yi .,. rd rDND .r. Ai: Ir i.a�'1 ,.MOi iii.,,,.. PLR NSTEINFi CREn'!V�[ G 1C /_._ /10 DESIC -N & S_G2dA.�i„ C FT;FIMBi:n C- ,- B1dr Trciecl . ou : lrme .. _ep!ac emen, _.... 822 .,),9 - "()TA':: 3, 067.6_ MN DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 10/7.1/10 3RD QTR STATE SURCHARGE Water utility NON- DEPARTWRNTAL 2,108.00 TOTAL: 2,108.00 MN DEPT OF REVENUE 9/28/10 STATE W/H General Fund NON - DEPARTMENTAL 2,151.38 TOTAL: 2,151.38 MINN NCPERS GROUP LIFE INS 9/28/10 MONTHLY- ELECT LIFE INS General Fund NON - DEPARTMENTAL 32.00 TOTAL: 32.00 NGUYEN, MICHELLE 10/11/10 SEPT MILEAGE REIM General Fund Finance 80.00 TOTAL: 80.00 NIELSEN, BRADLEY 10/11/10 LUC 09/27/10 REIM General Fund Planning 38.00 TOTAL: 38.00 OFFICE DEPOT 10/11/10 GEN SUPPLIES General Fund General Government 70.95 10/11/10 PLANNING GEN SUPPLIES General Fund Planning 70.76 TOTAL: 141.71 ON SITE SANITATION INC 10 /11 /10 BADGER PARK General Fund Parks & Recreation 45.96 10/11/10 CATHCART PARK General Fund Parks & Recreation 45.96 10 /11 /10 FREEMAN PARK General Fund Parks & Recreation 266.13 10/11/10 MANOR PARK General Fund Parks & Recreation 45.96 10 /11 /10 SILVERWOOD PARK General Fund Parks & Recreation 45.96 10 /11 /10 SOUTH SHORE SKATE General Fund Parks & Recreation 45.96 10 /11 /10 CHRISTMAS LAKE BOAT ACCESS General Fund Parks & Recreation 235.13 10 /11 /10 BIRCH BLUFF ROAD General Fund Parks & Recreation 45.96 TOTAL: 777.02 PAETEC 10/11/10 02/26 -03/25 SVC General Fund Municipal Buildings 135.86 10 /11 /10 02/26 -03/25 SVC General Fund Public Works 46.90 10/11/10 02/26 -03/25 SVC General Fund Parks & Recreation 145.60 10 /11 /10 02/26 -03/25 SVC Water Utility Water 98.70 10 /11 /10 02/26 -03/25 SVC Water Utility Water 100.25 TOTAL: 527.31 PERA 9/28/10 P/R DEDUCTS -PERA General Fund NON- DEPARTMENTAL 3,000.52 9/28/10 P/R DEDUCTS -PERA General Fund Administration 300.58 9/28/10 P/R DEDUCTS -PERA General Fund General Government 339.45 9/28/10 P/R DEDUCTS -PERA General Fund Elections 100.38 9/28/10 P/R DEDUCTS -PERA General Fund Finance 321.00 9/28/10 P/R DEDUCTS -PERA General Fund Planning 366.04 9/28/10 P/R DEDUCTS -PERA General Fund Protective Inspections 239.03 9/28/10 P/R DEDUCTS -PERA General Fund City Engineer 206.45 9/28/10 P/R DEDUCTS -PERA General Fund Public Works 494.28 9/28/10 P/R DEDUCTS -PERA General Fund Streets & Roadways 107.35 9/28/10 P/R DEDUCTS -PERA General Fund Sanitation /Weeds /Waste 35.51 9/28/10 P/R DEDUCTS -PERA General Fund Tree Maintenance 65.68 9/28/10 P/R DEDUCTS -PERA General Fund Parks & Recreation 496.07 9/28/10 P/R DEDUCTS -PERA Southshore Communi Senior Community Cents 35.20 9/28/10 P/R DEDUCTS -PERA Water Utility Water 170.60 9/28/10 P/R DEDUCTS -PERA Sanitary Sewer Uti Sewer 129.27 9/28/10 P/R DEDUCTS -PERA Recycling Utility Recycling 6.98 '0.07 -20 - 1:33 AM C O U N "` -. REPOR: PJ V - OCTOBER 1_, 2010 'AGE: , 'Ti ,1iiX r. SORT . {E "✓ DT ;; t .. Ctt "T Z0;1; A 1 EN An Tw_ 9/28/10 P/R DE U T5.PERA Stormwater `uSanagr.;. STORMW TER MANAGEMENT 86.70 TOTAL: 5,50'.09 PIPE SERVICES CORPORATION 10/1 SFNITARy C7,EN & TV REPORT Sanitary S °:aer Uti .Sewer 13,281.55 10/11/10 STORM SEW TELV INSPECTOR Stormwater Managem STORMWATER MANAGEMENT 840.00 TOTAL: 1 "_,121.55 POTTS, KENNETH N. 10 /11 /10 SERF PROSECUTIONS SVCS General Fund Professional Svcs 2,29,1.66_ TOTAL: 2,291.66 PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL GROUP 10 /11 /10 OCT DENTAL PREM General Fund Unallocated Expenses 765.68 TOTAL: 765.68 PURCHASE POWER 10 /11 /10 ACCOUNT ACCESS FEE General Fund General Government 39.99 TOTAL: 39.99 QWEST 10 /11 /10 SVC 09/25 -10/24 General Fund Municipal Buildings 120.71 10 /11 /10 SVC 09/25 -10/24 General Fund Public Works 56.95 10 /11 /10 SVC 09/25 -10/24 Water Utility Water 66.27 10/11/10 SVC 09/25 -10/24 Water Utility Water 66.27 TOTAL: 310.20 SHOREWOOD TRUE VALUE 10 /11 /10 HARDWARE General Fund Public Works 5.29 10/11/10 LIME General Fund Public Works 19.21 10/11/10 SAW BLADES General Fund Parks & Recreation 35.25 10/11/10 BATTERY Water Utility Water 13.87 10/11/10 ACID Water Utility Water 6.94 10/11/10 MEASURING WHEEL Sanitary Sewer Uti Sewer 79.08 TOTAL: 159.64 SO LK MTKA POLICE DEPT 10/11/10 4TH QTR LEASE PYMT General Fund Police Protection 57,017.00 10/11/10 OCT -OBE General Fund Police Protection 78,829 TOTAL: 135,846.00 SPEEDWAY SUPERAMERICA LLC 10/11/10 GAS General Fund Public Works 2,025.12 TOTAL: 2,025.12 SUN NEWSPAPERS 10 /11 /10 ABSENTEE VOTING & HR 09/30 General Fund Elections 46.48 10 /11 /10 WILDWOOD -09/23 General Fund Planning 42.90 10/11/10 INDOOR GARAGE SALE SSCC 09 Southshore Communi Senior Community Cente 40.00 TOTAL: 129.38 TKDA ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS PLANNERS 10 /11 /10 LS #15 &17 REHAB -JUL SVC Sanitary Sewer Uti Sewer 6,402.54 TOTAL: 6,402.54 TOTAL PRINTING SERVICES 10 /11 /10 OCT NEWSLETTER SVC General Fund General Government 1,084.69 10 /11 /10 BRUCE'S CARD General Fund Finance 82.83 TOTAL: 1,167.52 TWIN CITY WATER CLINIC 10/11/10 AUG BACTERIA ANALYSIS Water Utility Water 100.00 TOTAL: 100.00 UNUM LIFE INSURANCE CO 10 /11 /10 OCT LIFE INS PREM General Fund Unallocated Expenses 1,151.39 TOTAL: 1,151.39 VERIZON WIRELESS 10 /11 /10 L.S. PHONES- 08/22 -09/21 Sanitary Sewer Uti Sewer 213.73 10 -07 -2010 _ _3 AM U N C - L REPOR" ]TI ENDO3 OCTOBER 11, 2010 PTG1 6 J NT Z SIAZ' K `� )1. T lt 2IF ,_. I\, ,'L iI L1 � I+ .�` i0'v'I :' TOTi?.' 2 13. 73 WARNER CONNECT 10/11/10 AUG MAINT General Fund Municinal Buildings 2,800.00 7.0/11/10 OCT MAINT General Fund Municipal Buildings 2,800.00 10/11/10 WEB HOSTING -FEE & DOMAIN R General Fund Municinal Buildings 349.72 TOTAL: 5,949.72 WASTE MANAGEMENT OF WI -MN 10 /11 /10 OCT P.W. SVC General Fund Public Works 343.66 10 /11 /10 SSCC -AUG SVC Southshore Communi Senior Community Cents 146.04 TOTAL: 489.70 WELLS FARGO HEALTH BENEFIT SVCS 9/28/10 P/R DEDUCTS -HSA General Fund NON - DEPARTMENTAL 889.60 9/28/10 P/R DEDUCTS -HSA General Fund General Government 96.00 TOTAL: 985.60 WM. MUELLER & SONS, INC. 10/11/10 BLACKTOP General Fund Streets & Roadways _ -_ - 4_303.60, TOTAL: 4,303.60 WOODRUFF, RICHARD 10 /11 /10 TAX COMMITTEE MTG 09/28 General Fund Council _ _ 32.00 TOTAL: 32.00 XCEL ENERGY 10 /11 /10 STMT #254173558 --- 7/25 -8/23 General Fund Municipal Buildings 623.61 10/11/10 STMT #254173558 --- 7/25 -8/23 General Fund Police Protection 3.39 10/11/10 STMT #254173558 --- 7/25 -8/23 General Fund Public Works 477.19 10/11/10 STMT #254173558 --- 7/25 -8/23 General Fund Traffic Control /Str Li 24.54 10 /11 /10 STMT #254173558 --- 7/25 -8/23 General Fund Traffic Control /Str Li 3,050.53 10/11/10 5700 CTY RD 19 General Fund Traffic Control /Str Li 32.59 10 /11 /10 5700 CTY RD 19 UNIT LIGHTS General Fund Traffic Control /Str Li 183.69 10 /11 /10 STMT #254173558 --- 7/25 -8/23 General Fund Parks & Recreation 384.39 10/11/10 SSCC- 06/22 -07/24 Southshore Communi Senior Community Cents 799.58 10/11/10 24253 SMITHTOWN RD 8/21 -9/ Water Utility Water 898.18 10 /11 /10 STMT #254173558 --- 7/25 -8/23 Water Utility Water 1,059.05 10/11/10 STMT #254173558 --- 7/25 -8/23 Water Utility Water 821.21 10/11/10 STMT #254173558 --- 7/25 -8/23 Water Utility Water 2,447.78 10/11/10 STMT #254173558 --- 7/25 -8/23 Sanitary Sewer Uti Sewer 50 7.73 TOTAL: 11,313.46 ­PAYROLL EXPENSES 9/27/2010 - 99/99/9999 General Fund Council 1,300.00 General Fund Administration 4,294.04 General Fund General Government 4,849.23 General Fund Elections 1,433.97 General Fund Finance 4,585.74 General Fund Planning 5,229.26 General Fund Protective Inspections 3,414.79 General Fund City Engineer 2,949.18 General Fund Public Works 7,061.21 General Fund Streets & Roadways 1,533.43 General Fund Sanitation /Weeds /Waste 507.30 General Fund Tree Maintenance 938.21 General Fund Parks & Recreation 7,087.04 1 C) -0 7 -2010 1 7-,M ;C O ; +N C, _ i, REPORT BY VENDOR - OCTOR P 11, 201 PAGE: V ENDOR SORT K. r;Y _... LE �' _ .,, i.i 1..= ,, N P.i._ _.. )1 F Ap1T ✓I „4i _... Aa'"'.; *rPA. tOTiL FYVFTIc LS SO chshc r CoR'm,= Senior CCmmu -_ Ce 'f,e S02.96 Water Ut": l._ty Wcu:er _, A37 .01 Sanitary Sewer Ut1 Sewer _,846.66 Recycling Utili::y Recyciin.g 99.76 Stormwater Managem STORMWATER MANAGEMENT 1,238.92 TOTAL: 51,308 -71 --- -- --------- FUND TOTALS ________________ 101 General Fund 397,451.40 402 Park Capital Improvements 9,645.32 404 Street Capital Improvemen 3,134.60 410 City Bldg Project Svcs 822.29 490 Southshore Community Ctr. 7,849.41 601 Water Utility 16,596.88 611 Sanitary Sewer Utility 82,205.37 621 Recycling Utility 14,339.28 631 Stormwater ManagementUtil 7,648.34 GRAND TOTAL: 539,692.89 TOTAL PAGES: 7 101.0 -2016 1 AM IN NON D TPARTMEN AL Council Administration �. Ti N ,' I - REPORT I=,_ DEPART MIEN - C;C ODER 2010 i='iGE: 80.60 °Ui7D VIN ; .(AM_ 1 A ESC T 7(iD? ar.lOtjrd'I 10/11/10 Gene ,d. i „ F . TPS r. EDERFI. rJ /F: 9/78 FEDERAL W /i-+.. - `501.26 9/27/2010 - 99/99/9999 1,300.00 9/28/10 FICA w1H 2., O51.99 1,431.47 9/28/10 MEDICARE W/H 713.79 PERA 9/28/10 P/R DEDUCTS -PERA 3,000.52 9/28/10 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST - 302131 -457 9/28/10 P/R DEDUCTS- DEFERRED COM 1,025.00 BRIAN HECK - MEMBERSHIP 145.00 9/28/10 P/R DEDUCTS - DEFERRED TOM 333.55 4,294.0 MN DEPT OF REVENUE 9/28/10 STATE W/H 2,151.38 MINN NCPERS GROUP LI INS 9/28/10 MONTHLY- ELECT LIFE INS 32.00 9/28/10 WELLS FARGO HEALTH BENEFIT SVCS 9/28/10 P/R DEDUCTS -HSA 889.60 P/R DEDUCTS -PERA 339.45 TOTAL: 15,702.03 351.92 General Fund General Fund EFTPS - FEDERAL W/H WOODRUFF, RICHARD * *PAYROLL EXPENSES EFTPS - FEDERAL W/H PERA IPMA -HR * *PAYROLL EXPENSES General Government General Fund EFTPS - FEDERAL W/H PERA MIDWEST MAILING SYSTEMS INC OFFICE DEPOT WELLS FARGO HEALTH BENEFIT SVCS PURCHASE POWER TOTAL PRINTING SERVICES * *PAYROLL EXPENSES Elections General Fund EFTPS - FEDERAL W/H PERA SUN NEWSPAPERS * *PAYROLL EXPENSES Finance General Fund EFTPS - FEDERAL W/H PERA NGUYEN, MICHELLE TOTAL PRINTING SERVICES DeJONG, BRUCE * *PAYROLL EXPENSES Professional Svcs General Fund POTTS, KENNETH N. 9/28/10 FICA W/H 80.60 9/28/10 MEDICARE W/H 18.87 10/11/10 TAX COMMITTEE MTG 09/28 32.00 9/27/2010 - 99/99/9999 1,300.00 TOTAL: 1,431.47 9/28/10 FICA W/H 259.38 9/28/10 MEDICARE W/H 60.67 9/28/10 P/R DEDUCTS -PERA 300.58 10 /11 /10 BRIAN HECK - MEMBERSHIP 145.00 9/27/2010 - 99/99/9999 4,294.0 TOTAL: 5,059.67 9/28/10 FICA W/H 300.66 9/28/10 MEDICARE W/H 70.32 9/28/10 P/R DEDUCTS -PERA 339.45 10/11/10 OCT NEWSLETTER SVC 351.92 10 /11 /10 GEN SUPPLIES 70.95 9/28/10 P/R DEDUCTS -HSA 96.00 10 /11 /10 ACCOUNT ACCESS FEE 39.99 10 /11 /10 OCT NEWSLETTER SVC 1,084.69 9/27/2010 - 99/99/9999 4,849.23 TOTAL: 7,203.21 9/28/10 FICA W/H 88.90 9/28/10 MEDICARE W/H 20.77 9/28/10 P/R DEDUCTS -PERA 100.38 10/11/10 ABSENTEE VOTING & HR 09/30 46.48 9/27/2010 - 99/99/9999 1,433.97 TOTAL: 1,690.50 9/28/10 FICA W/H 284.32 9/28/10 MEDICARE W/H 66.49 9/28/10 P/R DEDUCTS -PERA 321.00 10 /11 /10 SEPT MILEAGE REIM 80.00 10 /11 /10 BRUCE'S CARD 82.83 10 /11 /10 GFOA CONE 09/21 -09/23 -MILE 144.50 10 /11 /10 GFOA CONF 09/21- 09 /23 -EXP 476.58 9/27/2010 - 99/99/9999 4,585.74 TOTAL: 6,041.46 10 /11 /10 SEPT PROSECUTIONS SVCS 2,291.66 TOTAL: 2,291.66 Planning General Fund EFTPS - FEDERAL W/H 9/28/10 FICA W/H 283.37 10.07- 2010 .1 .35 PM C O i7 N L R-PPORT BY Li,t AR Pi:EDS'?' - OCTOBER :.1, 2010 17= 2 irE tP a TM `N'7 EEND NAME DA'! DHISCRI - IT - ON AMCUIT- 91/28 MEDTCARE. "W /Y_ 66. >.6 PERA. 9/28/ P/R DEDUCTS PERA 366.04 . OFFICE DEPOT 10/11/10 PLANNING GEN SUPPLIES 70.76 NIELSEN, BRADLEY 10/11/10 "LUC 09/27/10 REIM 38.00 SUN NEWSPAPERS 1.0/'1/10 WILDWOOD -09/23 42.90 -PAYROLL EXPENSES 9/27/2010 - 99/99/9999 5,229.26 TOTAL: 6,096.59 Municipal Buildings General Fund CULLIGAN BOTTLED WATER 10 /11 /10 DRINKING WATER SVC 31.99 ADVANCED IMAGING SOLUTIONS INC 10/11/10 MAINT 08/15 -09/15 67.00 PAETEC 10/11/10 02/26 -03/25 SVC 135.86 CENTERPOINT ENERGY 10/11/10 SVC 8/19 -9/20 22.88 XCEL ENERGY 10 /11 /10 STMT42541.73558 --- 7/25 -8/23 623.61 LOCAL LINK 10/11/10 OCT WEBLINK SVC 69.95 QWEST 10/11/10 SVC 09/25 - 10/24 120.71 WARNER CONNECT 10 /11 /10 AUG MAINT 2,800.00 10 /11 /10 OCT MAINT 2,800.00 10 /11 /10 WEB HOSTING -FEE & DOMAIN R 349.72 TOTAL: 7,021.72 Police Protection General Fund XCEL ENERGY 10/11/10 STMT #254173558 --- 7/25 -8/23 3.39 SO LK MTKA POLICE DEPT 10/11/10 4TH QTR LEASE PYMT 57,017.00 10 /11 /10 OCT -OBE 78,829.00 TOTAL: 135,849.39 Fire Protection General Fund EXCELSIOR FIRE DISTRICT 10 /11 /10 OPERATIONS 74,528.33 10 /11 /10 BUILDINGS 68,157.24 TOTAL: 142,685.57 Protective Inspections General Fund EFTPS - FEDERAL W/H 9/28/10 FICA W/H 184.05 9/28/10 MEDICARE W/H 43.06 PERA 9/28/10 P/R DEDUCTS -PERA 239.03 -PAYROLL EXPENSES 9/27/2010 - 99/99/9999 3,414.79 TOTAL: 3,880.93 City Engineer General Fund EFTPS - FEDERAL W/H 9/28/10 FICA W/H 182.25 9/28/10 MEDICARE W/H 42.62 PERA 9/28/10 P/R DEDUCTS -PERA 206.45 FRONTIER PRECISION, INC. 10/11/10 BATTERIES & CHARGERS 344.40 -PAYROLL EXPENSES 9/27/2010 - 99/99/9999 2,949.18 TOTAL: 3,724.90 Public Works General Fund EFTPS - FEDERAL W/H 9/28/10 FICA W/H 424.52 9/28/10 MEDICARE W/H 99.29 PERA 9/28/10 P/R DEDUCTS -PERA 494.28 DAVIS, CHARLES 10 /11 /10 BOOTS 107.04 PAETEC 10 /11 /10 02/26 -03/25 SVC 46.90 AMERICAN MESSAGING 10 /11 /10 OCT PAGERS 8.98 CENTERPOINT ENERGY 10 /11 /10 SVC 8/19 -9/20 77.52 XCEL ENERGY 10/11/10 STMT #254173558 --- 7/25 -8/23 477.19 SHOREWOOD TRUE VALUE 10 /11 /10 HARDWARE 5.29 10/11/10 LIME 19.21 SPEEDWAY SUPERAMERICA LEG 10/11/10 GAS 2,025.12 QWEST 10 /11 /10 SVC 09/25 -10/24 56.95 AUTO ELECTRIC SPECIALISTS, INC. 10/11/10 BERING 23.42 WASTE MANAGEMENT OF WI -MN 10/11/10 OCT P.W. SVC 343.66 ..2010 C" O U N C I :.: REPO? E•v DE aRTMIENT - of rO;ER 1 1 , 2G - -0 PAGE: 3 DEP_ t 8ENT - UN - 1) VENDOR NAME `J! 1%'., -PAYROLL EXPEN E.. 9/27/2010 - 99/99/9999 TOTAL: : 11 , 2 7 0 . ; 8 Streets & Roadways General Fund EFTPS - FEDERAL W/H 9/28/10 FICA W/H 91.84 9/28/10 i'•'!EDICARE W/H 21.49 PERA 9/28/10 P/R DEDUCTS -PERA 10'7.35 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP. 10 /11 /10 HAUL SWEEPING & DISPOSAL 9,000.00 WM. MUELLER & SONS, INC. 10 /1 BLACKTOP 1 _,303.60 -PAYROLL EXPENSES 9/27/2010 - 99/99/9999 1,533.43 TOTAL: 15,057.71 Traffic Control /Str Li General Fund ELECTRICAL INSTALLATION & MAINTENANCE 10/11/10 SIGNAL RELAMP 107.00 XCEL ENERGY 10/11/10 STMT4254173558 --- 7/25 -8/23 24.54 10 /11 /10 STMT4254173558 --- 7/25 -8/23 3,050.53 10 /11 /10 5700 CTY RD 19 32.59 10/11/10 5700 CTY RD 19 UNIT LIGHTS 183.69 TOTAL: 3,398.35 Sanitation /Weeds /Waste General Fund EFTPS - FEDERAL W/H 9/28/10 FICA W/H 31.06 9/28/10 MEDICARE W/H 7.26 PERA 9/28/10 P/R DEDUCTS -PERA 35.51 -PAYROLL EXPENSES 9/27/2010 - 99/99/9999 507.30 TOTAL: 581.13 Tree Maintenance General Fund EFTPS - FEDERAL W/H 9/28/10 FICA W/H 56.38 9/28/10 MEDICARE W/H 13.18 PERA 9/28/10 P/R DEDUCTS -PERA 65.68 -PAYROLL EXPENSES 9/27/2010 - 99/99/9999 938.21 TOTAL: 1,073.45 Parks & Recreation General Fund FETES - FEDERAL W/H 9/28/10 FICA W/H 415.14 9/28/10 MEDICARE W/H 97.10 PERA 9/28/10 P/R DEDUCTS -PERA 496.07 COMMUNITY REC RESOURCES 10 /11 /10 SVC 09/27 -10/08 PCS 2,160.00 GOPHER SIGN COMPANY 10 /11 /10 COMMUNITY GARDEN SIGNS 91.71 PAETEC 10 /11 /10 02/26 -03/25 SVC 145.60 CENTERPOINT ENERGY 10 /11 /10 SVC 8/19 -9/20 28.77 XCEL ENERGY 10 /11 /10 STMT4254173558 --- 7/25 -8/23 384.39 SHOREWOOD TRUE VALUE 10 /11 /10 SAW BLADES 35.25 ON SITE SANITATION INC 10 /11 /10 BADGER PARK 45.96 10/11/10 CATHCART PARK 45.96 10/11/10 FREEMAN PARK 266.13 10 /11 /10 MANOR PARK 45.96 10/11/10 SILVERWOOD PARK 45.96 10 /11 /10 SOUTH SHORE SKATE 45.96 10 /11 /10 CHRISTMAS LAKE BOAT ACCESS 235.13 10 /11 /10 BIRCH BLUFF ROAD 45.96 -PAYROLL EXPENSES 9/27/2010 - 99/99/9999 7,087.04 TOTAL: 11,718.09 Unallocated Expenses General Fund MEDICA 10/11/10 OCT MEDICAL PREM 13,398.92 UNUM LIFE INSURANCE CO 10 /11 /10 OCT LIFE INS PREM 1,151.39 AFSCME CO 5 MEMBERS HEALTH FUND 10 /11 /10 OCT -UNION DENTAL PREM 357.00 PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL GROUP 10 /11 /10 OCT DENTAL PREM 765.68 TOTAL: 15.672.99 10.. 01 _201 _. 11 :3.5 AM N C I '-' OR" 'I,`i Ll,.:- „-'I �)C OBER I.._, 2 01 0 -AGF:. DEPARTMENT U -ND L_,N007 _NAP0E. DA 1_i T I .'1'7 lut, G- pi:_a1 Irnpro ✓e. e. Pa ,k pi��. -. 'rapro MISC'. ANDTLE 2C0N 1.0/.. 1 10 ! MANOR 'AR -i DC. PROPOSAL 7. 2,245.32 LARRY KERBER. 10 /11 /10 SILVERWOOD IARK- REMO`JE CUR 2,956.00 10 /11 /10 MANOR PARK-REMOVE BLACKTOP ^,450.00 TOTAL: 9,645.32 Street Cap,. Improvemen Street Capital Imp AMERICAN ENGINEERING 10 /11 /10 NELSON DR & WILDROSE LN 3,134.60 TOTAL: 3,134.60 Equipment Replacement City Bldg Project MISC. VENDOR PERNSTEINER CREATIVE G 10 /11 /10 DESIGN & SIGNAGE @C.CHAMBER _ 822.29 TOTAL: 822.29 Senior Community Cente Southshore Communi EFTPS - FEDERAL W/H 9/28/10 FICA W/H 31.19 9/28/10 MEDICARE W/H 7.29 PERA 9/28/10 P/R DEDUCTS -PERA 35.20 ANDERSON, KRTSTI B. 10 /11 /10 TULIP INS CERT FOR OKTOBER 325.00 COMMUNITY REC RESOURCES 10/11/10 SVC 9/23 -10/07 SSSCC ASSIS 214.50 10/11/10 4TH OTR SSCC MANAGEMENT 3,750.00 CENTERPOINT ENERGY 10/11/10 SSCC 06/17 -07/22 40.85 XCEL ENERGY 10/11/10 SSCC- 06/22 -07/24 799.58 CITY OF SHOREWOOD 10/11/10 SSCC - UTILITY PAYMENT 1,422.72 DEX 10 /11 /10 SSCC -SEPT ADS 9.85 SUN NEWSPAPERS 10/11/10 INDOOR GARAGE SALE SSCC 09 40.00 BLANCHARD CATERING, INC. 10/11/10 SSCC -FOODS FOR CARGILL 09/ 349.23 ECM PUBLISHERS, INC. 10/11/10 SO LK- EXCELSIOR CHAMBER 175.00 WASTE MANAGEMENT OF WI -MN 10 /11 /10 SSCC -AUG SVC 146.04 -PAYROLL EXPENSES 9/27/2010 - 99/99/9999 502.96 TOTAL: 7,849.41 NON - DEPARTMENTAL Water Utility MN DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 10/11/10 3RD QTR STATE SURCHARGE 2,108.00 TOTAL: 2,108.00 Water Water Utility EFTPS - FEDERAL W/H 9/28/10 FICA W/H 146.56 9/28/10 MEDICARE W/H 34.28 PERA 9/28/10 P/R DEDUCTS -PERA 170.60 CITY OF EXCELSIOR 10 /11 /10 3RD QTR WATER CONNECTION F 5,505.75 HAWKINS, INC. 10 /11 /10 CHLORINE 60.00 PAETEC 10 /11 /10 02/26 -03/25 SVC 98.70 10/11/10 02/26 -03/25 SVC 100.25 MIDWEST MAILING SYSTEMS INC 10/11/10 3RD QTR UTILITY POSTAGE 299.70 10/11/10 3RD QTR UTILITY POSTAGE 85.00 AMERICAN MESSAGING 10 /11 /10 OCT PAGERS 4.49 CENTERPOINT ENERGY 10 /11 /10 SVC 8/19 -9/20 20.12 10 /11 /10 SVC 8/19 -9/20 46.85 XCEL ENERGY 10 /11 /10 24253 SMITHTOWN RD 8/21 -9/ 898.18 10 /11 /10 STMT #254173558 --- 7/25 -8/23 1,059.05 10 /11 /10 STMT #254173558 --- 7/25 -8/23 821.21 10 /11 /10 STMT4254173558 - -- 7/25 -8/23 2,447.78 SHOREWOOD TRUE VALUE 10 /11 /10 BATTERY 13.87 10 /11 /10 ACID 6.94 TWIN CITY WATER CLINIC 10 /11 /10 AUG BACTERIA ANALYSIS 100.00 QWEST 10 /11 /10 SVC 09/25 -10/24 66.27 10/11/10 SVC 09/25 -10/24 66.27 10 -07 :; ?0 "_0 - '1.35 AM C' 0 - .j N T, 3EPOR !' B `?_MIENT -- OCTOBER 1L, DI,P M,LtV' ?iiri;i) VENDOR .<!. ° `/E i1. .1 .., *-PAVROT__ EXP NSFL 9/27/20 1 - 99/99/99`9 7 ,43'7.01 TO'r'Al.:; 1 NON - DEPARTMENTAL Sam -ta ry Sewer Uti METRO C_OL?NCIL ENV. (SAC) 10 /11 / 1 _0 AUG SAC REPORT -_ _- - 158.00 TOTAL: 4,158.00 Sewer Sanitary Sewer Uti EFTPS - FEDERAL W/H 9/28/10 FICA W/H 109.96 9/28/10 MEDICARE W/H 25.72 PERA 9/28/10 P/R DEDUCTS -PERA 129.27 BNR IRRIGATION SERVICES, INC. 10/11/10 SAN SEWER REP XCEL CTR 778.55 CONVEY SAFETY_ PRODUCTS 10 /11 /10 SAFETY GLOVES 87.74 KUSSKE CONSTRUCTION, INC 10 /11 /10 SAN SEWER REP XCEL CTR 7,168.00 METRO COUNCIL ENVMT(WASTEWATER) 10 /11 /10 OCT WASTEWATER SVC 47,027.65 MIDWEST MAILING SYSTEMS INC 10/11/10 3RD QTR UTILITY POSTAGE 299.70 10 /11 /10 3RD QTR UTILITY POSTAGE 85.00 AMERICAN MESSAGING 10/11/10 OCT PAGERS 4.49 XCEL ENERGY 10/11/10 STMT4254173558 -- -7/25 -8/23 507.73 PIPE SERVICES CORPORATION 10 /11 /10 SANITARY GLEN & TV REPORT 13,281.55 SHOREWOOD TRUE VALUE 10 /11 /10 MEASURING WHEEL 79.08 TKDA ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS PLANNERS 10 /11 /10 LS 415 &17 REHAB -JUL SVC 6,402.54 VERIZON WIRELESS 10 /11 /10 L.S. PHONES- 08/22 -09/21 213.73 —PAYROLL EXPENSES 9/27/2010 - 99/99/9999 1,846.66 TOTAL: 78,047.37 Recycling Recycling Utility EFTPS - FEDERAL W/H 9/28/10 FICA W/H 6.19 9/28/10 MEDICARE W/H 1.45 PERA 9/28/10 P/R DEDUCTS -PERA 6.98 MIDWEST MAILING SYSTEMS INC 10/11/10 3RD QTR UTILITY POSTAGE 299.70 10/11/10 3RD QTR UTILITY POSTAGE 85.00 ALLIED WASTE SERVICES 4894 10 /11 /10 OCT RECYCLING SVC 13,840.20 —PAYROLL EXPENSES 9/27/2010 - 99/99/9999 99.76 TOTAL: 14,339.28 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT Stormwater Managem EFTPS - FEDERAL W/H 9/28/10 FICA W/H 75.62 9/28/10 MEDICARE W/H 17.67 PERA 9/28/10 P/R DEDUCTS -PERA 86.70 HENN CTY TREAS.- TAXPYER SVCS DIVISION 10 /11 /10 3311723130012 -5620 CO RD N 423.73 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP. 10 /11 /10 HAUL SWEEPING & DISPOSAL 4,581.00 MIDWEST MAILING SYSTEMS INC 10 /11 /10 3RD QTR UTILITY POSTAGE 299.70 10 /11 /10 3RD QTR UTILITY POSTAGE 85.00 PIPE SERVICES CORPORATION 10 /11 /10 STORM SEW TELV INSPECTOR 840.00 —PAYROLL EXPENSES 9/27/2010 - 99/99/9999 1,238.92 TOTAL: 7,648.34 ].0 - 2018 iry tilN � v j N C - i i_SPC'RP BX ». AR'PMLP;2' - O( 70rER l , 20 _0 _ G 1 , . s 2i u;ST ,?L;ND .,N i:. O. - f C1 _�_.O,_ ,MC., �. _ ?FUND TOTALS -=- --- 1 01 Genera]. Fund 397,451.40 402 Park Capital Improvements 9,645.32 404 Street Capital lmprovemen 3,134.60 410 City Bldg Project Svcs 8 22.29 490 Southshore Community Ctr. 7,849.41 601 Water Utility 16,596.88 Ell Sanitary Sewer Utility 82,205.37 621 Recycling Utility 14,339.28 631 Stormwater ManagementUtil 7,648.34 GRAND TOTAL: 539,692.89 TOTAL PAGES: 6 COUNCIL ACTION FORM Department Council Meeting Item Number Administration October 11, 2010 3B From Brian Heck, City Administrator Date: October 6, 2010 Item Description: Staff/Volunteer Appreciation Event Background / Previous Action Plans are underway for the annual staff/volunteer appreciation dinner. Friday, December 10, has been selected as the date. The event will be held at the Southshore Community Center. A staff committee will work on the event details, which will include a social hour, dinner and staff years-of-service recognitions. Invitees will include commission members, police and fire chiefs, board representatives, and various contractors such as the city attorney. The 2010 budget has an allocation of $2,500 for appreciation activities. Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the date of Friday, December 10, 2010, for the Appreciation Event. Council Action: COUNCIL, ACTION FORM Department Engineering Council Meeting 10/11/10 Item Number: 3C From: James Landini, P.E. Item Description: Star Lane and Star Circle Road Rehabilitation Project 1. Accept the amended petition by motion. 2. Do nothing. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends that the Council accept the Petition. Council Action: To the MaYo r and citY COun-ci"- Shorewood- MN 81 PETITION AGAPNST STREET IMPROVEMENT �Rd,a l- � --ei�en is S — inc6 : ! - Z , 2oo 5�1,;w �2ir Additional signature added October 4, 2010 Filed this _ day of 2010 Rw 0 0 5 ZIA COUNCIL ACTION FORM MEMEMM Council Meeting October 11, 2010 From: Larry Brown, Director of Public Works Description: c to and Award Project, Lift Station 15 Rehabilitation Project #n June 14, 2010, the City Council authorized TKDA and Associates to prepare the design and • • documents for - .• • of • and 17, located on d . • Shady Island. Attachment 1 is a site location map for the two lift stations. The design has been completed, and staff directed TKDA to proceed with the issuance of proposals, by method of quote, versus a formal bid process. The ability to solicit quotes versus a formal bid process reduces the time to construction by six to eight weeks. Under Minnesota State Statute 471.345, municipalities may solicit response to contracts via quotes, if the Engineer's Estimate does not exceed $100,000. Attachment 2 is an excerpt from the State Statutes. The City's engineering consultant, TKDA, prepared said estimates indicating the following values: Project Engineer's Estimate of Construction Lift Station 15 $ 78,021.00 Lift Station 17 $ 78,522.00 Table 1 Plans were distributed to five reputable firms for quotes. Three firms chose to provide quotes for the lift stations. Quotes were received at 10:00 a.m. on Wednesday, October 06, 2010, at the Shorewood City Hall. Table 2 is a summary of the quotes received. Attachment 3 is the formal bid tabulation. Council Action: The quotes received far exceeded the engineer's estimate. Staff returned to the firms to inquire as to why the bids were unexpectedly high from the norm. The response received was that the pipe • i • vault work were complicated by . close proximity of , .,. Minnetonka. Proximity of adds • .: challenges to the project. Staff has also analyzed the question of whether quotes may be awarded, based on the fact that the amounts received in the quote process exceeded the threshold of $100,000. Statute is very specific in the statement that the decision to proceed with quotes or a public bidding process is determined by the engineer's estimate. Therefore, the quotes provided may be considered for award. Staff also discussed with contractors whether the timing of the quote process had an effect on pricing. The response received was that the presence of the Lake had more to do with the pricing than the bidding climate. If approved, this project is to be funded by the Sanitary Sewer Fund. The 5 year Capital Improvement Program allocates $200,000 for this project. It should be noted that the reason that this was initially budgeted for this amount conceptually was that before the design process was entered into, it was impossible to determine if the structures that house the lift stations had deteriorated and needed full replacement. This would be a much more complicated project than what was designed. Having been able to do the investigation through the design and structural review, it was determined that the vaults that house the equipment are sound enough to have minor coatings applied to the interior of the structure, at a significantly reduced cost form the CIP amount. Therefore, staff is recommending that the project be awarded to the low quote provided by Minger Construction, Inc. Accept the attached resolution that accepts the low quote and awards the contract to Finger Construction, Inc. Reject the quotes and proceed with a formal bid process to rebid the project at a different time Staff is recommending that the attached resolution be approved that accepts the low quote and awards the contract to finger Construction, for an amount of $118,088.80 for the Lift Station 15 Rehabilitation Project. ua Z a U Z w Z Z O w �- �a Q z < O a v O J W H N n Z Q Ln tJ'f Z _O a LL MINNESOTA STNTUTES 2010 471,345 471.345 UNIFORM MUNICIPAL CONTRACTING LAW. Copyright (D 2010 by the Office of the Revisor of Statutes, State of Minnesota. All Rights Reserved. Attachment 2 MINNESOTA STATUTES 2010 471.345 Subd. 9. [Repealed, 1990 c 549 s 3] Subd. 10. Shared hospital or ambulance service purchasing. Supplies, materials, or equipment to be used in the operation of a hospital licensed under sections 144.50 to 144.56 or an ambulance service licensed under chapter 144E that are purchased or leased under a shared service Copyright (D 2010 by the Office of the Revisor of Statutes, State of Minnesota. All Rights Reserved. z 6 0 1-0 0 1- 11 0 �'S 0 -o ni 5N 0 0 6 C\1 t Lo 0 W 0 CD q 0 0 F -10 c? • O 010 MIN N 2 P , — — 0 0 — — 0 . — — i 0 — — — — 0 0 00. 0 0 0 0 0 6 9 p m � o - 0 0 p 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 9 O 0 w n < O O.Mo 0 IQ (6 - ID m I Q 0 0.0..Om� N -P m 0 N 0 Z F o 0 0 < - - - - - - - - - - 2 < mwO OO..MM MM.N I m O — V3 64 64 64 — — — 64 fP. — ET 64 — — 64 EH — — — — — — — - — — — — — — — ----------- 00..�. --------- '0O 0 0 --------- coo. -000 .0O00.00O. M ro 1- 0J z omou . I I! o 0 oMomm—o c�i of < rl� m oo N r- m b N w.m C� () F 0 0 U Z 64 = u) 6F elj EA fR 64 FA V3 64 fA ell 0 ..coO --- W w (D 9 cO r-4 w M IQ "-I E"I p q 9 p O .. o c o 0 0 . 0 o o o P o 0 o. 0 3 F- J z 0 00 0 0 0 No n Oo.. . o O O o o o0o0oowcO m o . o c �2 O 0 c� Ci c:� 0 M m o N M C� 0 c\j oo 0 F U < Lij co (19 K3 69 d3 V3 EA VT Lu uj 0 o 9 lo? 0 Z W OoN.nNmc ci cD ID m c c m --t Z CC w (L m m m cm EA ER EA H3 64 H3 M EA H3 H3 ER Hi ... . — — — — — t — — — — } }>-Z — — — z z < >- < Z woof-[-I-Owww D ------------------ 0 -------- — --- ---------- U W W m u) > z w 0 F-- F- u) w w �E 0 w o- >- W > w Ld U) < cc 0 0 =) Lu z o z) F- u) o u) c) < OoOD�- .0 z 2 a z g W w o- MTOOO Z 0 < 2� -D 0 u) (B < (D u �- J z o f j Zw ZY Q J u) U) I < z N I S < X 0 � M z < N < < L LI W - , O cc w =) 0 a, < uj (n o w m o co 0 u) : � E w T w �: En L � : cc x — m o I D �- z 3: o z 0 w w CD z w cn =� o z w �� , , cf) z D O's > z 0 , (c cn < < m w < cr m < �zo w oo<<�- 0 (n D:�� LLCM w m co �2 w z , L 0 1 0 Lu w z Lu Il spa .0 uj Z cc cc c < < m uj T 0 0 0 00 6 z z 0 Ir z < 10 u) w w � b w � u) uj cc 0 > a < �w � - cc < 0 y c) co M -00 cr Z u >' w �- (3 (5 w m cc: cc. 5 < 'o 3: z z 0 �- cn (n () - < z 0 co Fn 2i LL 0 o > C3 b ?: z 0 0 z w 0 z w m w o c) w < w m z T z ox< F) w mU 6 cc z U < mm < < < C �,wT T O O DJ m, � z (D ( 2'. t 0 1- - �� < o u-j 0 m: z 0 N 0 Co w 0 1-- w (D > o z M 0 < cc < ni F- - 0 z 0 w > 0 -D < x � 0 0 D3 DE u) � u) w < (n Fn = E F I < 0 Fn o c 0 (n o n F L �- LL, w > Fn 0 :�i 0 < w nz3:p �: w 1 n m ow < 1� 5; < 0 Er 3: 0 w n . w Lj 0 o- 0 m D z z < 0 L < L w 0 cL a- 2 0 m m 0 COQ 'o 00 < 0 z F3 �- U M cc. u) ❑cl) > w — — — — — c < I-- I- , I w :5 Up I z � I 1 1 CITY OF SI OREWOOD RESOLUTION NO. 10- A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING QUOTES AND AWARDING C NT CT FOR THE REHABILITATION OF LIFT STATION NO. 1, CITY PROJECT NO. -I6 WHEREAS, pursuant to a solicitation. of quotes for local improvements designated as the Rehabilitation of Lift Station No. 15, City Project No. 10 -16, quotes were received, opened on October 6, 2010 and tabulated, and such tabulation is attached hereto and made a part hereof as Exhibit A9 and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that Minger Construction Inc. is the lowest proposer in compliance with the specifications. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Shorewood as follows: 1. That the Mayor and City Administrator /Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract with Minger Construction Inc. in the name of the City of Shorewood, Project No. 10 -16, according to the plans and specifications therefore approved by the City Council on file in the office of the City Administrator /Clerk. 2. That the City Administrator /Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to return forthwith to all quoters the deposits made with their quotes, except for the deposits of the successful quoter and the next two lowest quoters, which shall be retained until a contract has been signed. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD this 1 lth day of October, 2010. Christine Liz6e, Mayor ATTEST: Brian Heck, City Administrator /Clerk City of Shorewood Bid Tabulation LS 15 Shorewood City Project No. 10 - 16 IBIds Opened. 10.00 A-M. 6Cct ®1 0 Engineer: City of Shore — woodl I hereby certify that this tabulation is a correct and true representation of the bids received on this date for this Improvement Project James Landini, City Engineer p- 6 -, (9 L Date 4 Brad Nielsen Planner Date Exhibit A COUNCIL ACTION FORM Department Council Meeting item ember Public Works October 11, 2010 0®6 From: Larry Brown, Director of Public Works Date: October 6, 2010 Description: Accept Quote and Award Project, Lift Station 17 Rehabilitation Project Background / Previous Action Similar to - previous City Council Actis •s a • action considers acceptance the low quote a •' e award of • for - Lift Station Rehabilitation Pr• - As stated in the previous item, as background information, TKDA and Associates prepared the design and bid documents for the rehabilitation of Lift Station17, located on Shady Island. The City's engineering consultant, TKDA, prepared an estimate indicating the following value: Project Engineer's Estimate of Construction Lift Station 17 $ 78,522.00 Table 1 Plans were distributed to five reputable firms for quotes. Three firms chose to provide quotes for the lift stations. Quotes were received at 10:00 a.m. on Wednesday, October 06, 2010, at the Shorewood City Hall. Table 2 is a summary of the quotes received. Attachment 1 is the bid tabulation. Firm Quote Minger Construction Inc. $116,320.90 Lametti & Sons, Inc. $127,300.00 Geislinger& Sons, Inc. $130,167.00 Table 2 Council Action: Staff also discussed with contractors whether the timing of the quote process had an effect on pricing. The response received was that the presence of the Lake had more to do with the pricing than the bidding climate. |f approved, this project istobefundedfrnrnthe3anitgrySev/erFund. The 5 year Capital Improvement Program /C|P\ for this project was budgeted at $78,000. While the quotes received exceed the engineer's estimate at the design phase, there is a total of $278,000 that had been budgeted within the C|P for Lift Stations 15 and 17. Being that the total of the two lift stations is $234,409.78, adequate funds have been programmed in the CIP to complete both projects. Staff is recommending that the project beavx8rdedtothe|ovvquu1eprovdedbyK4\nger Construction, Inc. Options Accept the attached resolution that accepts the low quote and awards the contract to Minger Construction, Inc. Reject the quotes and proceed with a formal bid process to rebid the project at a different time. Staff Recommendation Staff im recommending that the attached resolution be approved that accepts the low quote and awards the contract toMingcz Construction for uo amount nf$ll6,320.q0. F- I o o m o in o 0 0 0 0 o u oIo J O O O o o N N d' O O m O w m M O N O N N lCl O Q 2 O n O 0 M r M ! O IQ M O et V M' (5Y (+� N �P Z I F - O In M 1 UJ Imo t� O v N N M n Q °� 69EP, sic -�I� ss e� sz s3 s� ss c» e3 e>! sr c ss e� e3 rfr ssl,. W Olo 110'0 O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o'0 O O o 0 0 O O O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0- W OI O O O O N N O O Ln O n M o o 0 0 m. O Q 'r . -,1 r- 0 0 (B O M M O N O J 2 U O In is I O to m O N N iN 64 64 69I EPrI EP. EF} 69 II ! II I , 64 69 �} E!3 64 ffr EPr69 ffl 6S fPr y-}) b9 '.. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IO) 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O OI 2 0000000 0 l 0 000 o coo oMOOO�no m m'. f- z LL2 -00 M d' O (h O J N O of O O d' N m 07 Lf1 M [D M M 7 (O m m 7 O M''. U H O ❑ O 2 a N w m ~ Q r r U) E9 fR ER N3 64 H} EA 69 . ... . . 69 ... H3 fA ER 64 ffl H}' O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m O O N 0 to O cc O O O O N 7 0 0 0 0 0 In m N d' O O O O W W to O O O M V In In V (O m (D M M (D N In z U N .- r M G M (D n n d d• V N ER 69 64 64 69 V3 (fl ffl Efl E9 H3 EA fA EPr fR 69 Ef3 K} 00 ... 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O W F O O O O O O o O 0 ICI O N O O O O O o 0 0 N J z O O O O Q Q O O N O tD O O O m m N V c0 OJ •- _ N O to F - O ll') N M to to r r V H O N in �.',,.... W U fR fPr 69 V3 H3 ER fA E9 W E w EH 64 H} FR d) K3 69 64 69 H} H3 fR 64 W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ICI 0 0 0 0 11-0 W ... 0 0 0 0 110. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Z_ W O o N O N M 0 O O o O (D O O O O O N N O O O O 0 0 0 0 z Z U O In O O O O O m W Z 2 m N v) v) n r a N 64 EA ER 69 64 64 64 64 69 64 EH 64 Efs 64 EA Eli 64 64 64 64 z cn (n W Ul } } } U7(n(/J (n >- y. }Zz2Q }Q I I. J J J J (/J (n U J J J U } F W W i- CC co > LU :5i �- (J m W W a W Q W CC } > mN z U) � Q a vO 0 0 00 2 D CO O O z_ O Q 2 '...,. °¢ O C7 z a g m m m v 0 0 J z O K ❑ mQ001- ~ Q O CC ( :3 z Q ( N LLJ CC 2. c o U W W d O m a CC (n p o 0 w O j W o wcc ❑ ( W0 co ozWa_m - mt�0� O ° o mW mQ Z W "m WDDJ❑ (' 0Zr\ 0❑ J w 'jam= N yO�mmOOQQ M aim HO 4 Y Z m m W NW Z F- W- QZZmO Z W LL cO Um m J Q Z.-m W (nF - mm�� W m ® 0, p 2 Z ¢ Q o O Z W W O W m a H H¢ O O O Z O�z >O (7ZZOC7 mm > NW Q > v~i��z�mm�m° > CJ Q z W U W m "O00Hm mm NUJ c�oti m �oo 2 J! N >. J a (S Md' HJ Q E 2 0 W W W Zr.QjU[� W C'3 a ZmOQ� a Z W Z O NN z X I- 67 J ��� � W c o ) t�nJLLO¢o❑p O N Q z O N W Q�w2i Q f u ' CL W j O Q W O a m ; 2 Z J m > W O W J a m F_ O a m F m >-Q ~O Z ❑ �F- ❑(n�� (n ❑cn OU�> CO Om UmU(n cn m (/J O. Q a Z LL, H 0 v i— OO,CC G G� O O O O�OL"1 O O a ai O O O OC > O O O o o'O G G��O G G> t-- � 0 -lo o oc o o - - oIo o o a a c cn o o o a as n ni�n . .n < ' 'co r ry - -- < � �n �o 1a7�r r r� 0 0 o o a o i �� � r N.. d d', O O N N0 t to t t�I ( ( N N j jo I ICT i!) ! oio�o l O O loo�o o O;O O o r rn o oIo 0 0 0 0 0'0 0 0'0 2 W N N � � 1 N o Y- m Y fR Y Y-f 64 r rF H H3 4 43169 E EH EF, E EA &3 E E/-r 64 EA' EP 6 6z K: E EAI 69 6 64 f ° 0 0 00o o oo ° olo 0 0 0 0 o o of o o o o 0 0 0 00 o o 00 0 0 v i— CITY OF SHOREWOOD RESOLUTION NO. 10-_ A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING QUOTES AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR THE REHABILITATION OF LIFT STATION N. 17 CITY PROJECT NO. 10-17 WHEREAS, pursuant to a solicitation of quotes for local improvements designated as the Rehabilitation of Lift Station No. 17, City Project No. 10 -17, quotes were received, opened on October 6, 2010 and tabulated, and such tabulation is attached hereto and made a part hereof as Exhibit A; and WHERE AS, the City Council has determined that Minger Construction Inc. is the lowest proposer in compliance with the specifications. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Shorewood as follows: 1. That the Mayor and City Administrator/Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract with Minger Construction Inc. in the name of the City of Shorewood, Project No. 10 -17, according to the plans and specifications therefore approved by the City Council on file in the office of the City Administrator/Clerk. 2. That the City Administrator/Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to return forthwith to all quoters the deposits made with their quotes, except for the deposits of the successful quoter and the next two lowest quoters, which shall be retained until a contract has been signed. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD this 11th day of October, 2010. Christine Liz&, Mayor ATTEST: Brian Heck, City Administrator/Clerk City of Shorewood Bid Tabulation LS 17 Shorewood City Project No. 10 -17 Uds �Opened: 10:00 A.M. Engineer: City of Shorewood 6-Oct-1 0 5W Geislinger Construction 130,167.00 iLametti & Sons 127 I hereby certify that this tabulation is a correct and true representation of the bids received on this date for this Improvement Project 4 9� James Landini, City Engineer /0-(,-10 Brad Niels Planner I - 10-4-10 - Date Exhibit A im STAFF REPORT Momm Council Meeting October 11, 2010 From: Larry Brown, Director of Public Works Date: October 6, 2010 J s y z f At the September 27 th , 2010 City Council Meeting, Councilmember Turgeon asked staff to report back regarding the inspection and maintenance schedule for storm water systems. To address this question, it is first necessary to discuss all of the components of the storm water system, as each one of these fall under different criteria. These are as follows: • Ponds and dry Impoundment areas • Critical control structures • Storm water outfalls and ditches • Catch Basins, manholes and storm sewer pipes Ponds and Dry Impoundment Areas The City has 50 ponds scattered throughout the City. This includes wet, dry and sedimentation basins. Historically, Public Works employees do end up visiting most, if not all of the basins throughout the City each year, based upon known issues, routine checks, or calls and concerns received from residents. Up until the past few years, this is the level of activity that has been budgeted for in the care and upkeep of ponds. Note that most of the ponds outside of natural occurring basins were constructed to NURP (Nationwide Urban Runoff Program) Standards. The NURP standard was developed out of a research project conducted by the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) between 1979 and 1983. It was the first comprehensive study of urban stormwater pollution across the United States. As such, NURP ponds did not begin to dot the landscape of the nation until after 1983. The detailed design of a NURP pond provides adequate sediment capacity for the anticipated erosion and accumulation that occurs during initial construction of the surrounding area and Council Action: the pond, in addition to a 25 year period of soil load that is expected from development after construction, Thus, the ponds were designed for a 25 year storage life, at a minimum. Since these ponds did not begin to dot the landscape until after 1983, it was anticipated that the earliest that ponds constructed in 1983 would have to be investigated for storage issues or serious degradation would be 2008. Add to the fact that many of the NURP ponds located within the City of Shorewood did not appear until the 1986 or later, the issue of capacity would not normally cause concern until 2011. Based on the above criteria, it was not unreasonable to conduct maintenance of these ponds in an unstructured manner, or on an as needed basis. each pond. To date, the City has only completed this type of inspection for one pond, (Manor Park Pond), as the time commitment to perform this is extensive. In addition, survey costs were $1,470; Soil Testing was $5,000; and disposal of the hazardous sediment was approximately $250,000 for this single pond. Critical Control Structures Critical control structures are the various weirs, culverts or overflow structures that are put in place which govern the high water level and normal water line for each water body, whereby the malfunction of this structure would cause significant impact to homes, roads or property. These structures are checked by personnel after every heavy rainfall. Typically, this means a rainfall that exceeds two inches, or a rainfall that has a short duration and high intensity of precipitation. There are many of these control structures throughout the City. The table below lists the most critical structures that govern the larger water bodies or impoundment areas. 3 dBewood Road Cross Culverts Noble Road Cross Culverts Tributary Area of 7633 Acres. Tributary Area of 236.2 acres. Shorewood Oaks Trail /Spillway between Controls area of homes historically Freeman Park and Shorewood Oaks Drive impacted between Shorewood Oaks Drive and Freeman Park. Waterford Pond Outlet at Waterford Place Governs elevation of water for properties in and adjacent the Waterford Development. Mary Lake — No Outlet Governed by percolation. Water elevation is checked visually for impacts to adjacent homes. Christmas Lake Dam (weir structure) Governs elevation of Christmas Lake Birch Bluff Road Cross Culverts Controls elevation of wetland on the East and West sides of Eureka Road. Woodhaven Well near 5600 Apple Road Sweetwater Curve Weir Structure Controls upstream collection areas south of the structure. Silver Lake Stormwater Outfalls and Ditches Similar to ponds, historically, outfall structures and outlet ditches have been visited periodically, based on known issues, or issues reported by residents or other parties. The City has 89 outfall structures in total. M w ._ �r ,. - sufAIC I I e 117"IT and 1 miles r • • •- der the new NP Requirements percent o structures are t o be checked each year and documented Up until two years ago, staff did not have the resources to perform such tasks. As the City Council is aware, and has been discussed at several work sessions, a greater effort has been achieved at meeting this NPDES goal by reallocating staff time from the water department and meter reading duties, to perform storm water structure inspections and maintenance. While there has been an increased effort at televising known issues of the storm sewer pipes, this is an area that is not currently funded. Therefore, Public Works personnel respond to an average of approximately 15 calls per year of suspected separated pipe, structural issues, or holes that appear, due to a failure or separation of the pipe. These are repaired using in house staff or contractors. Public Works personnel also have structures where there are known or observed issues, due to capacity issues, historical plugging by debris or other known potential impacts. There are approximately 30 of these areas that are known that are checked after every heavy rainfall, as described above. Conclusion: Certainly, with the increased pressure by regulatory agencies, recent standards that have been passed, and an increased concern and awareness by the public to increase maintenance of these facilities, there is going to be substantial pressure to increase maintenance efforts, which ultimately is tied hand in hand with discussions as to how to fund the objectives that are desired. Staff will try to address questions at the meeting on Monday evening. COUNCIL ACTION FORM Department Cound Meeting item Number Administration October 11, 2010 10A From: Brian Heck, City Administrator Date: October 6, 2010 Item Description: Consider revising license fee for Massage Therapist Mr. Steven Gamm Owner/Operator ® LaVida Massage, contacted us regarding the license fee his therapists are assessed to practice massage therapy and wants the Council to consider revising the fees and allowing for pro-rating of license fees. Mr. Gamm opened LaVida massage in August, 2010, in the Shorewood Village Shopping Center, 23780 Hwy 7. Five massage therapists applied for and received a license to work at the business. The license fee consists of a onetime investigation fee of $100.00 and an annual license fee of $150. The first attachment comes from Mr. Gamm and outlines his rational for reduced license fee, a facility license, and/or pro-rating of the individual license. The second attachment contains information on license fees in other metro area communities. Options Direct staff to prepare amendments to the Massage Therapy license to include facility license, individual license, fee structure, pro-rating, etc.; • Consider pro-rating current license fees and provide refunds accordingly; • No change to the current fee / ordinance Recommendation Staff recommends Council direct staff to review the existing ordinance and fees and bring council suggested revisions to the October 25 meeting. Council Action: Jean Parch From: Steven Gamm [sgamm(c" lavidamaesage.com] Sent: Friday, October 01, 2010 5:13 PM To: Jean Panchyahyn Cc: gate Ranweiler' Subject. LaVida Massage - request for council consideration Ladies and Gentlemen, My name is Steven Gamm and am the owner of LaVida Massage located in the Shorewood Village Shopping Center. We are a new business providing a valued service to the community and are working to treat our employees as fairly as possible. My request has to do with enabling current and future employment in Shorewood for Massage Therapists and has two parts by making the fees less of a hardship. 1. Please apply 2010 license fees to 2011 for current and any additional licenses issued now to the end of the year. a. Our therapists paid a full license fee for only a few months of work. In addition they are participating in a new business and are not yet earning to their full potential. Requiring an additional $150 for all of our therapists on January 1 is a hardship. b. If we do not support this and I need to hire more therapists prior to January 1, they will pay double for the right to work in Shorewood. c. Consider making a pro -rated fee scale for future first year applicants Please re- consider the basis for the annual license fee for massage therapists. Research suggests there is a wide variety of fees required by cities in the Minneapolis /St Paul area. Some require business licenses or only therapist licenses or a combination of the two. My request is to ensure that the fees in Shorewood are still consistent with the city objectives. We believe in licensing and regulation and have no issue with fees to process them, but suggest that $50 /therapist /year is sufficient to meet the need — and thank you for giving this request consideration. Please know that I am available to assist or answer questions at your request. Respectfully, Steven Gomm Owner /Operator - LaVida Massage 612 9917425 (Mobile) 952 474 3699 (Center) masts http://www.lavidamassage.com www .excelsior.mn.lavidamassage.com Massage Therapy License Fees of other Cities St. Louis Park $9S Massage Therapist Individual S325 Massage Therapy Establishment fee $2S Massage Therapist and Massage Therapy Establishment License Holder Hopkins $10O Massage Therapist individual $50 background check (initial application) Plymouth $75 Massage Therapy Certificate fee $150 Investigation fee (initial application) $25 Massage Therapy Center License $300 Investigation fee (initial application) Orono L_|u just establishing a Business license; no fees established yet, but they will license the establishment, not individual therapists. The following cities do not license Massage Therapists: Victoria, Mound, Excelsior, Chanhassen �]��-�� ACTION FORM ��Y�W�.��^ ���. � 0��0�� �`�����/� Description/Background/Previous Action During the discussion on the SLMPD budget, Councilmember Bailey suggested that the SLMPD undergo a management study. The purpose of such a study would be to see if the department is using best practices, address staffing, facilities, etc. Councilmember Bailey asked that this item appear on the agenda for additional discussion. I posed the question of management studies on the International City/County Managers Association website. I asked if other cities conducted these studies, how often, and for what purpose. Mr. Roderick Woods, CK4of Beverly Hills, CA, provided one nf the best answers. "I conducted a Management Audit review of every department about every five to six years, We actually did one or two every year sob was nuo five nr six year cycle to start over. The world, technology, labor, and all the assumption of business activity can and does change sometimes a lot in five years. While these audits were the city managers audit, I forged a partnership with the departments to be full participants in the audits developing the issues and ClUestions the Departments wanted to look at as well as what I wanted to look at in the Departments, The purpose of the audits were to see what circurnstances and assumptions had changed, what new systems and technology were available, what best practices currently are in the industry and how to improve effectiveness and efficiency, |vveot to great lengths to make SUre these were not witch hunts, goLchas or a means to fire anyone. What I did need was information on how to make the clepartments the best they could be within the available budget, The draft audit was then fully reviewed by the manager and departments separately and together for finding any errors and for coming to agreement on what would be implernented from the audit report. I find that about 80% of the Consultant's recommendations fit the internal and external needs of the city and some of those need fine tuning. Remember, it is not the consultant's report or consultant's organization, it's yours. There are a number of reasons why all cccnrunnendadnos should not be implemented ranging h-oon practicality, costs to politics, all real Lbiogx ioa public agency. The goal is continuous improvement in the departments and city's service to out citizens at the lowest costs possible. An outside look will help bring new ideas and avoid losing opportunities doLo inherent blinders f,oco being too close Lo the isuuuu." Council Action: