Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Appendix F
• • APPENDIX F P8 Water Quality Modeling Results P� • P8 WATER QUALITY MODELING RESULTS TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. I. Description of the P8 Water Quality Model ...... ............................... 1 II. Interpretation of P8 Water Quality Model Results . ............................... 2 III. Christmas Lake and Galpin Lake Watersheds P8 Model 13 A. P8 Water Quality Modeling Input Sheet ...... ............................... 5 B. Percent Removal Efficiency of Treatment Device by Particle Class ............... 6 C. Percent Removal Efficiency of Treatment Device by Water Quality Component. 7 D. Concentration Present in the Inflow of Each Treatment Device for each Particle Class . .................. ............................... for each Particle Class . ................... ............................... 8 E. Concentration Present in the Inflow of Each Treatment Device for Each Water Quality Component .......... ............................... 9 • F. Concentration Present in the Outflow of Each Treatment Device F. for Each Particle Class .................................................. 10 G. Concentration Present in the Outflow of Each Treatment Device for Each Particle Class ................... ............................... for Each Water Quality Component ........ ............................... 11 IV. Carson Bay, Lake William, and St. Albans Bay Watersheds P8 Model A. P8 Water Quality Modeling Input Sheet ..... ............................... 12 B. Percent Removal Efficiency of Treatment Device by Particle Class .............. 13 C. Percent Removal Efficiency of Treatment Device by Water Quality Component. 14 D. Concentration Present in the Inflow of Each Treatment Device for each Particle Class . .................. ............................... 15 E. Concentration Present in the Inflow of Each Treatment Device for Each Water Quality Component ......... ............................... 16 F. Concentration Present in the Outflow of Each Treatment Device for Each Particle Class ................... ............................... 17 G. Concentration Present in the Outflow of Each Treatment Device • for Each Water Quality Component ........................................ 18 • V. Purgatory Creek Watersheds P8 Model A. P8 Water Quality Modeling Input Sheet ..... ............................... 19 B. Percent Removal Efficiency of Treatment Device by Particle Class .............. 20 C. Percent Removal Efficiency of Treatment Device by Water Quality Component. 21 D. Concentration Present in the Inflow of Each Treatment Device for each Particle Class . .................... ............................. E. Concentration Present in the Inflow of Each Treatment Device for Each Water Quality Component ......... ............................... 23 F. Concentration Present in the Outflow of Each Treatment Device for Each Particle Class ..................... ............................. G. Concentration Present in the Outflow of Each Treatment Device for Each Water Quality Component ......... ............................... 25 VI. West, Lake Virginia, West - Central, Lake Minnewashta, South - Central, Central, and Lake Mary Watersheds P8 Model A. P8 Water Quality Modeling Input Sheet ..... ............................... 26 • B. Percent Removal Efficiency of Treatment Device by Particle Class C. Percent Removal Efficiency of Treatment Device by Water Quality C ............................. D. Concentration Present in the Inflow of Each Treatment Device for each Particle Class . .................. ............................... 29 E. Concentration Present in the Inflow of Each Treatment Device for Each Water Quality Component ......... ............................... 30 F. Concentration Present in the Outflow of Each Treatment Device for Each Particle Class ............................... 31 G. . .................. Concentration Present in the Outflow of Each Treatment Device for Each Water Quality Component ...................................... .. VII. Gideon Bay, North - Central, and Lake Minnetonka Watersheds P8 Model 33 A. P8 Water Quality Modeling Input Sheet ..... ............................... B. Percent Removal Efficiency of Treatment Device by Particle Class ............... 34 C. Percent Removal Efficiency of Treatment Device by Water Quality Component.............................. ............................. • D. Concentration Present in the Inflow of Each Treatment Device for each Particle Class . .................... .............................36 • E. Concentration Present in the Inflow of Each Treatment Device for Each Water Quality Component ......... ............................... 37 F. Concentration Present in the Outflow of Each Treatment Device for Each Particle Class ................... ............................... 38 G. Concentration Present in the Outflow of Each Treatment Device for Each Water Quality Component ......... ............................... 39 • 1 I. DESCRIPTION OF P8 WATER QUALITY MODEL In an effort to provide the City with additional information on existing and future water quality, an urban water quality model was developed. The computer program used to model water quality within the City of Shorewood is the "Program for Predicting Polluting Particle Passage through Pits, Puddles, and Ponds" referred to as the P8 Urban Catchment Model developed by Dr. William W. Walker, Jr. The P8 urban water quality model predicts the generation and transportation of stormwater run- off pollutants within the City. This model can estimate pollutant loadings, concentrations and removal efficiencies for basins subject to single or continuous rainfall events. The model will simulate the performance of a variety of treatment devices including swales, buffer strips, detention ponds, flow splitters, infiltration basins and general devices. The initial calibration of this model corresponds to values measured under the Nationwide Urban Run -off Program or NURP. Specific calibration of this model for the City of Shorewood will require water quality monitoring data for selected areas in the City. Without calibration of the model to site specific data, predictions for specific parameter concentrations, flows, and loadings will be less reliable. However, the relative predictions concerning the removal efficiency of a • basin by particle size will be unaffected by calibration. The methodology used to model the City of Shorewood is described as follows. The Stormwater Treatment basins were assumed to provide a minimum of 4 feet of depth below the invert of the basin outlet and existing line pool storage between the basin outlet and the high water level. The storage volume of the treatment basin between the NWL and HWL was obtained from the TR -20 modeling effort for the 100 -year storm event. The dimensions of the treatment basins as well as the peak discharge rates from these basins are shown in the P8 Input Tables. Some preliminary calibration to regional standards has been completed for this P8 Water Quality Model. The data used to calibrate this model was run -off data collected from the City of Minneapolis. The original parameters that the P8 Model estimates are total suspended solids (TSS), total kjeldahl nitrogen (TKN), total phosphorous (TP), copper (CU), lead (PB), and zinc (ZN). In addition to these parameters, when calibrated to run -off data from the City of Minneapolis, the following water quality parameters were added to the calibrated model, hydrocarbons (HC), chemical oxygen demand (COD) and biological oxygen demand (BOD). Again, it must be noted that the concentrations of individual water quality parameters estimated by P8 Water Quality Computer Model may vary significantly with concentrations obtained in the field. This inconsistency is due to the extreme variation in water quality parameter concentrations • observed from individual subwatersheds. However, the estimated removal efficiency of treatment Page 1 • basins should be comparable to the removal efficiencies determined from field investigations. This is a result of removal efficiencies being estimated by the total removal of suspended solids. The removal efficiency of a stormwater treatment basin is determined by the particle size distribution and settling velocity of the total suspended solids found in the stormwater run -off received by the basin. The following particle classes are based primarily upon calibration of run -off concentrations and settling velocity measured under the Nation -Wide Urban Run -off Program: PARTICLE CLASS DESCRIPTION PERCENT OF TSS SETTLING VELOCITY (FT/HR) P O% Dissolved 0 0 P 10% 10th Percentile 20 0.03 P 30% 30th Percentile 20 0.3 P 50% 50th Percentile 20 1.5 P 80% 80th Percentile 40 15 The first class permits consideration of the dissolved fractions of stormwater run -off quality • components. The storm event used to model water quality is a 1 -inch, 24 -hour, Type II storm. II. INTERPRETATION OF P8 WATER QUALITY MODEL RESULTS The P8 water quality modeling results are summarized on the following table. This table contains the estimated minimum, mean, and maximum concentrations of water quality parameters found in both the inflow to a stormwater treatment basin and the outflow. This table is a summary of all stormwater treatment basins modeled in the City of Shorewood. Minimum is defined as the treatment basin within the City of Shorewood which contains the lowest concentration of these water quality parameters and its inflow, and outflow, as well as, the treatment basin with the lowest removal efficiency of these parameters. Mean is the average concentration of water quality parameters found in the inflow, the outflow and the average treatment efficiency of basins within the City of Shorewood. Maximum is defined as the highest concentration of water quality parameters found in the inflow and outflow. The maximum removal efficiency is that pond in Shorewood which removes the greatest percentage of the water quality parameters from stormwater run -off. The treatment efficiency of a pond will be somewhat dependent upon the quality of water entering the stormwater treatment basin. A stormwater treatment basin which receives a large volume of stormwater from watersheds which have treated runoff prior to discharge into the downstream pond • Page 2 • will show a reduced treatment or pollutant removal efficiency when compared to treatment basins that only receive untreated runoff.. Included in this Appendix is a breakdown of the treatment efficiencies, as well as, the concentrations of water quality parameters for each stormwater treatment basin proposed for the City of Shorewood. These tables, as well as the P8 input, are contained in Sections III, IV, V, VI and VII of this Appendix. • Page 3 City of Shorewood Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan P8 Water Quality Monitoring Results Page 4 City of Shorewood Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan Christmas Lake and Galpin Lake Watersheds -P8 Results -Model Input �a,��.... 755 .,... �. J„ L < 'S�<'N`�_. ". ;, ... :q,;.. gg, 2 M° ;� > . < ' .: _� �. .. ° '�. I .. ;M t =ryA� ,�,.' �.. �„ ) ?..�..,: � .e.ws.> a �. oF• ¢i� r:�� _ _ �. V� 3...:isiFdS+ W,E - d � 1.:,1'� I � k ey, [ Fl �...,t;e:. � .. F V'� ; 2^3 P S .. J.s.. ''i:s a..'(.e•. � -c� _ 1 l' ,.j $, � . , E`.. # - J :. .: � �.e ,..Ek..S •� CL1 1 10.6 0.243 68 1 3 0.3 1.0 3.3 30.0 14.1 CL1A 22 47 0.240 68 22 3 3.5 4.1 6.9 19.9 4.0 CL1 B 23 1 11.1 0.240 68 23 3 0.2 0.4 1.3 1.3 6.5 CL2 2 50 0.353 61 2 3 8.6 9.8 11.1 44.9 3.9 CL3 3 356.6 0.670 61 3 4 239.0 254.0 269.0 1016.0 15.8 CL4 4 8.2 0.225 61 4 out - -- 0.8 4.0 18.3 14.0 CL5 5 15.9 0.300 61 5 6 - -- 0.4 1.3 1.8 22.4 CL6 6 23.7 0.434 61 6 out - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- CL7* 7 267.9 0.250 61 7 out - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- GL1 8 32.6 0.327 61 8 9 0.5 0.8 0.9 0.5 76.8 GL2 9 49.1 0.230 61 9 out 1.0 2.2 9.3 27.2 7.5 GL3 10 36 0.283 61 10 11 2.3 3.8 4.8 11.3 10.6 GL4 11 25.9 0.434 61 11 13 0.5 1.0 3.8 10.9 24.8 GL5 12 5.8 0.380 68 12 13 0.9 2.6 3.8 9.9 0.5 GL6 13 28.2 0.488 61 13 out - -- 0.2 1.4 4.9 22.5 GL7 14 43.8 0.380 61 14 out - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- GL9 16 8.5 0.250 61 16 17 0.7 1.1 1.9 12.2 4.9 GL10 17 46.8 0.434 61 17 out - -- - -- - -- - -- --- GL11 * 18 49.7 0.407 61 18 11 - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- GL12* 19 34.1 0.380 61 19 10 - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- GL13* 20 34 0.407 61 20 9 - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- GL14* 21 19.6 0.327 61 21 8 1 - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- * CL 7 represents the area in Chanhassen tributary to Christmas Lake. Subwatershed parameters were assumed. Note: Storage is the flood pool available to 100 year HWL. Peak Discharge is the 100 year basin outflow. * Subwatershed areas outside City boundaries tributary to City of Shorewood. Page 5 W:\1074.08 \P8 tables- EASTISHOREAST -I -P8 INPUT (1) City u, Shorewood Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan Christmas Lake and Galpin Lake Watersheds -P8 Results PERCENT REMOVAL EFFICIENCY OF- TREATMENT DEVICE FOR EACH PARTICLE CLASS a 4.1 " WIN ' WAS , 1 k CB1 s 1A 0.175 .L, t' t 0.818 4 h� 0.247 0.061 IS M " b 0.009 2 C62 0.529 3.792 1.401 0.541 0.104 3 C133 0.669 5.45 2.17 1.077 0.248 4 CB4 0.839 10.392 4.599 1.313 0.273 5 CB5 1 15.508 9.76 3.769 0.893 6 C66 0.468 2.606 0.889 0.249 0.04 7 C67 0.917 8.393 4.118 1.914 0.426 8 CB8 0.419 2.455 0.307 0.037 0.004 9 C69 1 13.114 5.053 1.241 0.245 10 CB10 0.434 2.618 0.326 0.04 0.005 11 CB11 0.998 11.091 2.239 0.249 0.025 12 CB12 1 4.131 0.442 0.078 0.015 13 CB13 1 4.018 0.416 0.074 0.014 14 CB14 0.431 2.069 0.224 0.033 0.005 15 CB15 0.646 4.404 1.89 0.875 0.19 16 C616 1 16.849 16.849 16.849 33.698 17 C617 0.999 15.503 9.329 3.378 0.802 18 LW1 0.999 14.668 10.971 6.91 2.562 19 LW2 0.208 1.235 0.168 0.031 0.004 20 SAB1 0.54 3.639 1.445 0.619 0.123 21 SA62 0.433 2.563 0.691 0.169 0.026 22 SAB3 0.429 2.805 0.673 0.165 0.025 23 SAB4 1 16.849 16.8491 16.8491 33.698 25 OVERALL 0.441 3.503 1.981 1.7611 3.4 Page 6 WA1074.081P8 tables- EASTiSHOREAST -I -P8 %rem -pc (2) City of Shorewood Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan Christmas Lake and Galpin Lake Watersheds-P8 Results PERCENT REMOVAL EFFICIENCY OF TREATMENT DEVICE FOR EACH WATER QUALITY COMPONENT h as iig n? �'.�5. ��.. 3%a,.f ?. 9. .)ti s ��� ,, k�, yy �Z . n2*; > A' - 7(6��' �i.. 1,;- gg gg :. s� .,-'C� t?�"'Y ., ',. '��9�+� ':t 5G � :4. k :-.�i� Lqr� rw 4' %,ft� MON � � �i. Lb���L'- ��d "s � iw. h � ��'' W- m mn, - MIN I," PS �' = � 'E _'� a kn 'S E � E � : i. ;.�'�' 'n '�. �?.� � ��� ,i� �3 2 5 .$R � $ � - 1 CLI 83.7 27.3 20.1 20.1 54.8 20.1 54.8 67.8 69 2 CL2 97.2 63.2 53.2 53.2 85.8 53.2 85.8 92.1 92.6 3 CL3 97.5 62.7 52.6 52.6 85.7 52.6 85.7 92.5 93 4 CL4 38.9 7 4.9 4.9 19.4 4.9 19.4 19.4 20.7 5 CL5 78.3 42.6 35.9 35.9 69.2 35.9 69.2 56.7 58.9 6 CL6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 CL7 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 8 GL1 74.1 38.3 32.2 32.2 65.5 32.2 65.5 52.1 54 9 GL2 85 46.3 37.9 37.9 71.6 37.9 71.6 71 72.4 10 GI-3 94.4 60.1 50.6 50.6 83.4 50.6 83.4 86.7 87.5 11 GI-4 72.8 34.2 28 28 62 28 62 52 53.7 12 GI-5 98.5 64.6 54.4 54.4 87 54.4 87 95.2 95.4 13 GI-6 42.9 12.6 9.9 9.9 32.4 9.9 32.4 21.6 22.9 14 GI-7 98.1 64.2 54.1 54.1 86.7 54.1 86.7 94.1 94.4 16 GI-9 96.9 62.9 53 53 85.6 53 85.6 92.1 92.5 17 GL1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 GL1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 GI-12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 GL1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 GL14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 CL1A 96.8 1 62.7 62.8 52.8 85.5 52.8 85.5 91.6 92.1 23 CL1 B 88.5 53.7 45.2 45.2 78.1 45.2 78.1 77.5 78.3 25 OVERALL 88.6 56.4 47.5 78.3 47.5 78.3 81.8 1 82.5 Page 7 W. tables-EASTlSHOREAST-1-P8 %rem-wqc (3) City of Shorewood Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan Christmas Lake and Galpin Lake Watersheds -P8 Results CONCENTRATION (PPM) PRESENT IN THE INFLOW OF EACH TREATMENT DEVICE FOR EACH PARTICLE CLASS 1 `Y CL1 WN °`�Mi- NEAR, •. 0.784 4u. -+x4.. 4 .E �"41fY Y 5.117 X i F 3 6 �� �� s 3.332 5 1F ST d 2.788 •& dl S 5.272 2 CL2 1 16.849 16.849 16.849 33.699 3 CL3 0.938 15.328 15.2 15.175 30.337 4 CL4 0.121 0.783 0.193 0.129 0.229 5 CL5 1 16.849 16.849 16.849 33.699 6 CL6 1 15.505 12.913 11.84 23.088 7 CL7 1 16.849 16.849 16.849 33.699 8 GL1 1 16.849 16.849 16.849 33.698 9 GI-2 0.998 15.261 12.47 10.844 20.582 10 GI-3 1 16.848 16.848 16.848 33.696 11 GL4 0.794 11.125 10.033 9.783 19.427 12 GI-5 1 16.829 16.829 16.829 33.659 13 GI-6 0.789 9.597 6.242 4.398 6.807 14 GL7 1 16.849 16.849 16.849 33.699 16 GI-9 1 16.849 16.849 16.849 33.699 17 GL10 0.925 15.379 15.293 15.267 30.509 18 GL11 1 16.849 16.849 16.849 33.699 19 GL12 1 16.849 16.849 16.849 33.699 20 GL13 1 16.849 16.849 16.849 33.698 21 GI-14 1 16.849 16.849 16.849 33.699 22 CL1A 1 16.811 16.811 16.811 33.621 23 CL1 B 1 16.811 16.811 16.811 33.621 25 OVERALL 1 16.848 16.848 1 16.848 1 33.696 Page 8 W11074.08 \P8 tables- EAST1SHOREAST -I -P6 [NFL -pc (4) City of Shorewood Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan Christmas Lake and Galpin Lake Watersheds-P8 Results CONCENTRATION (PPM) PRESENT IN THE INFLOW OF EACH TREATMENT DEVICE FOR EACH WATER QUALITY COMPONENT 1 C131 1.136 0.035 0.195 g g% t : 0.002 SNOW 0.002 0.011 0.069 2.873 P, "JUN 0.402 2 CB2 5.839 0.12 0.645 0.0071 0.008 0.037 0.264 13.365 1.8781 3 C133 8.945 0.161 0.851 0.0091 0.011 0.049 0.369 19.488 2.746 4 CB4 16.577 0.235 1.197 0.013 0.017 0.069 0.583 36.48 5.15 5 C135 29.93 0.339 1.657 0.017 0.027 0.095 0.923 58.888 8.448 6 C136 3.785 0.098 0.539 0.006 0.006 0.031 0.202 9.17 1.286 7 CB7 14.851 0.236 1.226 0.013 0.017 0.07 0.563 30.947, 4.395 8 CB8 2.803 0.084 0.469 0.005, 0.005 0.027 0.168 7.827 1.072 9 CB9 19.653 0.28 1.426 0.0151 0.02 0.082 0.692 44.734 6.28 10 CB10 2.989 0.088 0.488 0.005 0.005 0.028 0.176 8.326 1.14 11 CB1 1 13.604 0.243 1.284 0.013 0.016 0.074 0.556 35.039 4.825, 12 CB12 4.665 0.188 1.072 0.011 0.01 0.061 0.355 13.554 1.859 13 CB13 4.523 0.187 1.068 0.011 0.01 0.061 0.352 13.21 1.812 14 CB14 2.332 0.083 0.468 0.005, 0.005 0.027 0.16 6.677 0.915 15 CB15 7.359 0.147 0.792 0.0081 0.01 0.045 0.327 16.073 2.272 16 CB16 84.245 0.473 2.173 0.023 0.063 0.125 2.145 98.06 14.4581 17 CB17 29.012 0.334 1.636 0.017 0.026 0.094 0.903 58.07 8.311 18 LWI 35.111 0.361 1.74 0.018 0.031 0.1 1.04 60.851 8.817 19 LW2 1.438 0.042 0.234 0.002 0.002 0.013 0.084 3.957 0.543 20 SAB1 5.826 0.121 0.655 0.007, 0.008 0.038 0.266 13.069 1.842 21 SAB2 3.449 0.09 0.498 0.005 0.005 0.029 0.186 8.701 1.211 22 SAB3 3.667 0.091 0.499 0.005 0.006 0.029 0.19 9.336 1.295 23 SAB4 84.2451 0.473 2.173 0.023 0.063 0.125, 2.145 98.06 14.458 Page 9 W:\1074.08P8 tables-EASTlSHOREAST-1-P8 INFLOW-wqc (5) City of Shorewood Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan Christmas Lake and Galpin Lake Watersheds -P8 Results CONCENTRATION (PPM) PRESENT IN THE OUTFLOW OF EACH TREATMENT DEVICE FOR EACH PARTICLE CLASS !� �.�� �r%M.�A s *r. �1 � 02 a p o ss�"..!!��zz Rr-1�'Y1' o a o > tt a 1 CB1 1 16.612 16.612 16.612 33.225 2 C132 0.83 13.174 13.056 13.018 26.013 3 CB3 1 16.849 16.849 16.849 33.699 4 CB4 0.839 11.908 10.746 10.347 20.098 5 CB5 1 16.849 16.849 16.849 33.699 6 CB6 1 16.849 16.849 16.849 33.699 7 C137 1 16.849 16.849 16.849 33.699 8 C68 0.872 11.442 7.421 5.031 7.99 9 CB9 1 16.849 16.849 16.849 33.699 10 CB10 0.472 3.546 1.101 0.623 1.046 11 CB11 0.999 15.729 10.592 5.642 6.329 12 CB12 1 16.849 16.849 16.849 33.699 13 CB13 1 6.333 3.297 2.998 5.879 14 CB14 0.539 4.299 2.024 1.73 3.38 15 CB15 1 16.849 16.849 16.849 33.699 16 CB16 1 16.849 16.849 16.849 33.699 17 CB17 1 16.849 16.849 16.849 33.699 18 LW1 1 16.849 16.849 16.849 33.699 19 LW2 1 16.221 15.157 13.987 24.733 20 SAB1 1 16.849 16.849 16.849 33.699 21 SAB2 1 16.847 16.847 16.847 33.695 22 SA63 1 16.849 16.849 16.849 33.699 23 SAB4 1 16.8491 16.849 16.849 33.699 25 1 OVERALL 11 16.8311 16.831 16.831 33.662 Page 10 W: \1074.08 \P8 tables-EAST 1SHOR EAST- I -P8 OUTFL -pc (6) City of Shorewood Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan Christmas Lake and Galpin Lake Watersheds-P8 Results CONCENTRATION (PPM) PRESENT IN THE OUTFLOW OF EACH TREATMENT DEVICE FOR EACH WATER QUALITY COMPONENT M 5 I R 0 1 CL1 2.67 0.111 0.636 g Su Lggijg"o, ME 0.007 0.006 0.036 *0 0,209 7.418 1.029 2 CL2 1.344 0.036 0.2 0.002 0.002 0.11 0.074 3.556 0.49 3 CL3 0.773 0.023 0.129 abbi 0.001 0.007 0.046 2.149 0.294 4 CL4 0.814 0.024 0.135 0.001 0.001 0.008 0.048 2.248 0.308 5 CL5 18.277 0.271 1.393 0.015 0.019 0.08 0.661 42.43 5.937 6 CL6 63.346 0.409 1.926 0.02 0.049 0A1 1.675 80.436 11.759 7 CL7 84.246 0.473 2.173 1 0.023 0.063 0.125 2.146 98.062 14.459 8 GL1 21.755 0.291 1.469 0.015 0.022 0.084 0.739 46.795 6.624 9 GI-2 8.8 0.196 1.061 0.011 0.012 0.061 0.42 22.058 3.064 10 GI-3 4.312 0.108 0.596 0.006 0.007 0.034 0.225 11.076 1.534 11 GI-4 13.68 0.205 1.054 0.011 0.015 0.06 0.499 29.259 4,144 12 GI-5 0.896 0.024 0.136 0.001 0.001 0.008 0.05 2.25 0.311 13 GI-6 15.433 0.22 1.121 0.012 0.016 0.064 0.545 32.797 4.656 14 GI-7 0.242 0.007 0.04 0 0 0.002 0.014 0.669 0.092 16 GI-9 1.9 0.045 0.246 0.003 0.003 0.014 0,095 4.573 0.639 17 GLIO 76.447 0,432 1.991 0.021 0.057 0.114 1.951 89.207 13.15 18 GL1 1 84.245 0.473 2.173 0.023 0.063 0.125 2.145 98.06 14.458 19 GL12 84.244 0.473 2.173 0.023 0.063 0.125 2.145 98.059 14.458 20 GL13 84.245 0,473 2.173 0.023 0.063 0.125 2.145 98.06 14.458 21 GL14 84.245 0.473 2.173 0.023 0.063 0.125 2.145 98.06 14.458 22 CL1A 2.692 0,127 1 0.731 0.008 0.007 0.042 0.234 7.76 1.075 23 CL1 B 9.703 0.212 1.148 0.012 0.013 0.066 0.457 21.99 3.117 25 OVERALL 9.976 0.106 0.536 0,006 0.009 0.031 0.317 16.217 2.326 Page 11 WA1074.08P8 tables-EAST1 SHOR EAST- I -P8 outflow-wqc (7) City of Shorewood Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan Carson Bay, Lake William, and St. Albans Bay Watersheds p ax: 6.. .' tt. ,•rta b- MI- 3•'3 s"8' . u s *G`6 ". '.i.. 4 , i. s L..w: +' 3 az � - • ..s.... r.t."'.. -. . _� - ..ii^. 'J� ',he3yK4 'M - Rw.?� �inaS. t>�-,"�r�•'x 'tL'�R3 ..�.>xi� CB 1 1 7.5 0.188 71 -P8 Results ., .::. :.. .. . TV Ea £_ .... rl" :�t .•r �, .� ,0'., 4 .: >vt' =.:ad �.. ,.. .. ,. .�. �"-_. i e �.,` „°4. Sa; r , � m erg tnlhe �.. "JLl+. nTd.. 1 t, ~r.: r -'q: i . . <-e .. a�` ba6 , tea. .q. 4.w ly. e �y�3Y x ..Sr' ���jjY)'9- � l7J7 /�J� x Y 3 . t' e3- +f"..,. by x .s"r -Ear .....,a - '::k �i ��4,:h`"k. '?�`:z... � `eAt� -7:.;s '" ='4"�,". .5 ,., l.�:v. � -t s� .s..: n*s '•' �' r atr a i� ".R't. ��.. 2 0.1 1.4 3.5 16 1.2 CB 2 24.9 0.215 71 2 1 4 0.5 0.8 3.2 7.9 6.8 CB 3 15.2 0.515 61 3 4 0.5 0.7 1.4 7 4.1 CB 4 4 38.0 0.569 61 4 8 - -- 0.3 4.3 2.7 10 CB 5 5 13.3 0.300 66 5 8 - -- 0.1 3.0 9 12.4 CB 6 6 10.5 0.407 61 6 8 0.2 1.1 2.5 9.7 2.2 CB 7* 7 26.3 0.325 61 7 8 0.2 0.4 2.4 17.2 8.4 CB 8 8 48.8 0.325 61 8 1 10 8.1 9.6 11.9 67.6 6.5 CB 9 9 14.3 0.325 61 9 10 - -- 0.3 1.9 7.1 12.4 CB 10 10 6.1 0.380 61 10 14 0.6 1.0 1.9 11.3 9.3 CB 11 11 1 1.5 0.200 61 11 14 - -- 0.2 0.2 0.1 3.6 CB 12* 12 17.2 0.300 61 12 13 - -- 1.4 2.4 12.7 8.2 CB 13 13 3.4 0.321 71 13 1 14 - -- 0.3 1.5 4.8 5.9 CB 14 14 23.0 0.407 61 14 out 2.4 3.8 5.5 23.1 25.2 CB 15 15 4.9 0.407 61 15 out 0.1 0.3 1.1 5.8 2.8 CB 16 16 16.5 0.461 61 16 out - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- CB 17 17 4.6 0.325 61 17 11 - -- 0.0 0.8 0.8 4.9 LW 1 18 39.3 0.300 61 18 19 0.1 0.1 1.1 3.3 36.6 LW 2 19 71.7 0.407 61 19 out 15.8 17.9 20.3 87.9 3 SAB 1 20 15.1 0.250 61 20 out 0.6 1.3 6.5 6.9 SAB 2 21 16.9 0.300 67 21 out 0.5 1.2 4.0 6.6 1.4 SAB 3 22 38.7 1 0.407 1 61 22 out 2.2 3.3 3.8 7.4 5.8 SAB 4 23 21.3 1 0.488 1 61 1 23 out I - -- I - -- I - -- I - -- I --- * CB 7 and CB 12 account for the areas in Deephaven that drain into Shorewood. Note: Storage is the flood pool available to 100 year HWL. Peak Discharge is the 100 year basin outflow. Page 12 W:\1074.08 \P8 tables- EAST2SHOREAST -2 -P8 INPUT (1) City o► ,orewood Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan Carson Bay, Lake William, and St. Albans Bay Watersheds -P8 Results PERCENT REMOVAL EFFICIENCY OF TREATMENT DEVICE FOR EACH PARTICLE CLASS 1 C61 0 ' ;p ��y 94.2 �E Zu�� }} �' `k 98.5 5 3j�� ¢ � � ga 99.6 100 2 C132 0 69.2 89.3 95.8 99.6 3 CB3 0 65 87.1 93.6 99.3 4 C64 0 12.7 57.2 87.3 98.6 5 C135 0 8 42.1 77.6 97.3 6 C66 0 83.7 94.7 98.5 99.9 7 C137 0 49.8 75.6 88.6 98.7 8 CB8 0 73.8 95.9 99.3 100 9 C139 0 22.2 70 92.6 99.3 10 CB10 0 24.9 1 70.4 93.6 99.6 11 CB11 0 29.5 78.8 95.6 99.6 12 CB12 0 75.5 97.4 99.5 100 13 CB13 0 36.5 87.4 97.5 99.8 14 CB14 0 49.3 88.9 98.1 99.9 15 CB15 0 72.7 88.8 94.8 99.4 16 CB16 0 0 0 0 0 17 CB17 0 8 44.6 79.9 97.6 18 LW1 0 12.9 34.8 59 92.4 19 LW2 0 85.9 98.9 99.8 100 20 SA61 0 76.6 1 91.4 96.3 99.6 21 SA132 0 83.1 95.9 99 99.9 22 SAB3 0 80 96 1 99 99.9 23 SA64 0 0 0 0 0 25 OVERALL 1 0 75.4 88.2 89.5 1 89.9 Page 13 W11 074.08 \P8 tables- EAMSHOREAST -2 -PS %rem -pc (2) City of Shorewood Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan Carson Bay, Lake William, and St. Albans Bay Watersheds-P8 Results PERCENT REMOVAL EFFICIENCY OF TREATMENT DEVICE FOR EACH WATER QUALITY COMPONENT 5.... ,Y � 1 Y���...' CB1 � .� ,: 6i 98.5 '. kl'£ f�� S., 64.3 �' � "5� 54.1 i` rt ��� 54.1 S.°° � 86.8 t '� it 54.1 'x � i; sY 86.8 91 51P �. Ei S 95.3 .fi Y` •'. 95.4 2 C132 90.7 54.9 45.9 45.9 79.4 45.9 79.4 80.9 81.8 3 C133 88.8 54.3 45.7 45.7 78.5 45.7 78.5 78.3 79.3 4 CB4 68.8 30.6 25.1 25.1 58.5 25.1 58.5 43.9 46 5 CB5 64.5 28.2 23.8 23.8 57 23.8 57 39.9 41.6 6 C136 95.3 61.2 51.5 51.5 84.2 51.5 84.2 89.4 89.9 7 CB7 82.3 47.3 39.8 39.8 72.7 39.8 72.7 68.1 69.3 8 CB8 89.5 44.4 35 35 68.7 35 68.7 79.8 80.7 9 C139 76.7 40.8 34.4 34.4 67.7 34.4 67.7 54.4 56.6 10 CB10 52 12.9 9.3 9.3 28.4 9.3 28.4 33.7 35.2 11 C131 1 64.5 31.9 25.6 25.6 50 25.6 50 45.9 48.3 12 CB12 94.5 60.2 50.7 50.7 83.5 50.7 83.5 86.2 87.1 13 CB13 75.6 21.2 15.4 15.4 47.2 15.4 47.2 53.2 55.2 14 CB14 78.6 25.6 19 19 51.6 19 51.6 60.6 62.1 15 CB15 91 56.6 47.7 47.7 80.4 47.7 80.4 82.5 83.2 16 CB16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 CB17 65.6 29.3 24.7 24.7 57.9 24.7 57.9 40.8 42.5 18 LW1 58.3 23.6 19.8 19.8 51.5 19.8 51.5 37.9 39 19 LW2 96.4 60.3 50.2 50.2 83.2 50.2 83.2 90.7 91.3 20 SA131 92.7 58.4 49.2 49.2 81.9 49.2 81.9 85.1 85.7 21 SAB2 95.6 61.4 51.7 51.7 84.4 51.7 84.4 89.4 90 22 SA133 95 60.8 51.2 51.2 83.9 51.2 83.9 88 88.7 23 SAB4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 OVERALL 86.6 55.9 47.1 47.1 76.5 47.1 76.5 1 81.2 81.8 Page 14 WA1074-08P8 tables-EAST23HOREAST-2-P8 %rem-wqc (3) City of Shorewood Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan Carson Bay, Lake William, and St. Albans Bay Watersheds -P8 Results CONCENTRATION (PPM) PRESENT IN THE INFLOW OF EACH TREATMENT DEVICE FOR EACH PARTICLE CLASS '^`+r �d R f X i t 1 �p' v� � GS.�sJ,.11'� C131 a .A�y vRk� - (Rj 1 3t £ .Std °vim Y 16.612 y ` .lsx �'r�+.� I SM � � S y �" v✓` 16.612 a C '�lj� �.' .�1.4 1 e ser #..Y ;Q � }t�a{�.8 ,K F({� 33.225 2 C62 0.83 13.174 13.056 13.018 26.013 3 C63 1 16.849 16.849 16.849 33.699 4 C64 0.839 11.908 10.746 10.347 20.098 5 C65 1 16.849 16.849 16.849 33.699 6 C136 1 16.849 16.849 16.849 33.699 7 C67 1 16.849 16.849 16.849 33.699 8 C138 0.872 11.442 7.421 5.031 7.99 9 C139 1 16.849 16.849 16.849 33.699 10 CB10 0.472 3.546 1.101 0.623 1.046 11 C131 0.999 15.729 10.592 5.642 6.329 12 CB12 1 16.849 16.849 16.849 33.699 13 CB13 1 6.333 3.297 2.998 5.879 14 CB14 0.539 4.299 2.024 1.73 3.38 15 CB15 1 16.849 16.849 16.849 33.699 16 CB16 1 16.849 16.849 16.849 33.699 17 CB17 1 16.849 16.849 16.849 33.699 18 LW1 1 16.849 16.849 16.849 33.699 19 LW2 1 16.221 15.157 13.987 24.733 20 SA61 1 16.849 16.849 16.849 33.699 21 SA132 1 16.847 16.847 16.847 33.695 22 SAB3 1 16.849 16.849 16.849 33.699 23 SAB4 1 16.849 16.849 16.849 33.699 25 OVERALL 1 16.831 16.831 16.831 33.662 Page 15 W: \1074.08 \P8 tables- EAMSHOREAST -2 -P8 INFL -pc (4) City of Shorewood Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan Carson Bay, Lake William, and St. Albans Bay Watersheds -P8 Results CONCENTRATION (PPM) PRESENT IN THE INFLOW OF EACH TREATMENT DEVICE FOR EACH WATER QUALITY COMPONENT 8 'h' J�'S 5 ,, �fir' : X l SI� y , y E'St} L>A<.: % '.k °4# F.o-1 „��a. �,,. '„e ,� { ' ��� }} u d , - ,:tP xay�� -•�.,• '�... �, fi�z�, i �� .rte � h,.,, �1'$d� 4 s ,�a, fl: �'�..R�.e x : ?•,5� &` � z;�" ,.F�..1 �? <~: ;.� &�'o-t , .:... € � i � e .�-. �.. �N`+. ' y '. '��; } � Y^ _ _' i,hi �d�r: F..... ��, j �'. �� f 8 �a a *x,�..,, n+� �. �=e t S YI � {.. t"R-•ai a 3 1 ,�T'SE �a Y 5.,.. 1 C61 1.136 0.035 0.195 0.002 0.002 0.011 0.069 2.873 0.402 2 C132 5.839 0.12 0.645 0.007 0.008 0.037 0.264 13.365 1.878 3 C133 8.945 0.161 0.851 0.009 0.011 0.049 0.369 19.488 2.746 4 CB4 16.577 0.235 1.197 0.013 0.017 0.069 0.583 36.48 5.15 5 C65 29.93 0.339 1.657 0.017 0.027 0.095 0.923 58.888 8.448 6 C66 3.785 0.098 0.539 0.006 0.006 0.031 0.202 9.17 1.286 7 C137 14.851 0.236 1.226 0.013 0.017 0.07 0.563 30.947 4.395 8 CB8 2.803 0.084 0.469 0.005 0.005 0.027 0.168 7.827 1.072 9 C139 19.653 0.28 1.426 0.015 0.02 0.082 0.692 44.734 6.28 10 CB10 2.989 0.088 0.488 0.005 0.005 0.028 0.176 8.326 1.14 11 CB11 13.604 0.243 1.284 0.013 0.016 0.074 0.556 35.039 4.825 12 C612 4.665 0.188 1.072 0.011 0.01 0.061 0.355 13.554 1.859 13 CB13 4.523 0.187 1.068 0.011 0.01 0.061 0.352 13.21 1.812 14 CB14 2.332 0.083 0.468 0.005 0.005 0.027 0.16 6.677 0.915 15 C131 7.359 0.147 0.792 0.008 0.01 0.045 0.327 16.073 2.272 16 CB16 84.245 0.473 2.173 0.023 0.063 0.125 2.145 98.06 14.458 17 CB17 29.012 0.334 1.636 0.017 0.026 0.094 0.903 58.07 8.311 18 LW1 35.111 0.361 1.74 0.018 0.031 01 1.04 60.851 8.817 19 LW2 1.438 0.042 0.234 0.002 0.002 0.013 0.084 3.957 0.543 20 SAB1 5.826 0.121 0.655 0.007 0.008 0.038 0.266 13.069 1.842 21 SA62 3.449 0.09 0.498 0.005 0.005 0.029 0.186 8.701 1.211 22 SA133 3.667 OA91 0.499 0.005 0.006 0.029 0.19 9.336 1.295 23 SA134 84.245 0.473 2.173 0.023 0.063 0.125 2.145 1 98.06 14.458 25 OVERALL 10.644 0.115 0.597 1 0.006 1 0.01 0.034 0.35 1 15.777 2.268 Page 16 WA1074.08P8 tables- EAST2SHOREAST -2 -P8 INFLOW -wqc (5) City of Shorewood Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan Carson Bay, Lake William, and St. Albans Bay Watersheds -P8 Results CONCENTRATION (PPM) PRESENT IN THE OUTFLOW OF EACH TREATMENT DEVICE FOR EACH PARTICLE CLASS f 1 ," sk ,4 9Y+a.�"- C61 ; -{ `[Yr) �Ca.: 0.175 ` fi 0.818 '4� �N 0.247 0.061 0.009 2 C62 0.529 3.792 1.401 0.541 0.104 3 CB3 0.669 5.45 2.17 1.077 0.248 4 C134 0.839 10.392 4.599 1.313 0.273 5 C65 1 15.508 9.76 3.769 0.893 6 C66 0.468 2.606 0.889 0.249 0.04 7 C137 0.917 8.393 4.118 1.914 0.426 8 C138 0.419 2.455 0.307 0.037 0.004 9 C69 1 13.114 5.053 1.241 0.245 10 C610 0.434 2.618 0.326 0.04 0.005 11 CB11 0.998 11.091 2.239 0.249 0.025 12 CB12 1 4.131 0.442 0.078 0.015 13 CB13 1 4.018 0.416 0.074 0.014 14 CB14 0.43 2.069 0.224 0.033 0.005 15 CB15 0.646 4.404 1.89 0.875 0.19 16 CB16 1 16.849 16.849 16.849 33.698 17 CB17 0.999 15.503 9.329 3.378 0.802 18 LW1 0.999 14.668 10.971 6.91 2.562 19 LW2 0.208 1.235 0.168 0.031 0.004 20 SAB1 0.54 3.639 1.445 0.619 0.123 21 SA132 0.433 2.563 0.691 0.169 0.026 22 SA133 0.429 2.805 0.673 0.165 0.025 23 SAB4 1 16.849 16.849 16.849 1 3.698 25 OVERALL 0.441 3.503 1.98 1.761 1 3.4 Page 17 W. \1074.08 \P8 tables- EAST2SHOREAST -2 -P8 OUTFL -pc (6) City of Shorewood Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan Carson Bay, Lake William, and St. Albans Bay Watersheds -P8 Results CONCENTRATION (PPM) PRESENT IN THE OUTFLOW OF EACH TREATMENT DEVICE FOR EACH WATER QUALITY COMPONENT ' +k { ek ,..M 2'< . Q ^ �r .. - fi r= "13 Me �s£` 1 & t ?; • ^ ��i.� ,, C131 sS `4 1 , � -9 ,' r�.es! $5 S a w �,�'4 �r ,,: , '3'�'$ }•. 83.062 E . - 2 ,p ,4, N .5��''� r .� 0.468 .'�` ~ :i 4'Y S4 �I,1 a r-- :p.p! � ''a.. { 2.156 E3 3 k. j '�'� t�` pqK" +i^ 0.023 i 1.$' •' 5 ak», c a e• t '� t �^ Ny' 0.062 ' 1'. ,, § L t ni.l { � - �, 01.,{, 9 , ,. 0.124 h ka • i? Y �; e'"gz�. a Ee na ' �-.�? 2.119 r' 1 b$ ?t !`j,` s1" b t'^�PLxE��•i'��.�' •? ?':r;. 96.706 - gab s.a ^. ,ii 3n �4 k , '{?1' ..:::. 14.259 2 C132 65.262 0.376 1.739 0.018 0.049 0.1 1.676 76.318 11.248 3 C133 84.246 0.473 2.173 0.023 0.063 0.125 2.146 98.062 14.459 4 CB4 53.099 0.338 1.598 0.017 0.041 0.092 1.404 65.011 9.54 5 CB5 84.246 0.473 2.173 0.023 0.063 0.125 2.146 98.062 14.459 6 CB6 84.246 0.473 2.173 0.023 0.063 0.125 2.146 98.062 14.459 7 CB7 84.246 0.473 2.173 0.023 0.063 0.125 2.146 98.062 14.459 8 C138 31.885 0.287 1.411 0.015 0.027 0.081 0.935 49.543 7.146 9 C69 84.246 0.473 2.173 0.023 0.063 0.125 2.146 98.062 14.459 10 C1310 6.316 0.108 0.58 0.006 0.008 0.033 0.26 12.834 1.799 11 CB11 38.292 0.357 1.726 0.018 0.033 0.099 1.111 64.789 9.344 12 CB12 84.246 0.473 1 2.173 0.023 0.063 0.125 2.146 98.062 14.459 13 CB13 18.506 0.238 1.263 0.013 0.02 0.072 0.666 28.232 4.048 14 CB14 11.432 0.136 0.711 0.007 0.012 0.041 0.392 18.15 2.59 15 CB15 84.246 0.473 2.173 0.023 0.063 0.125 2.146 98.062 14.459 16 CB16 84.246 0.473 2.173 0.023 0.063 0.125 2.146 98.062 14.459 17 CB17 84.246 0.473 2.173 1 0.023 0.063 0.125 2.146 98.062 14.459 18 LW1 84.246 0.473 2.173 0.023 0.063 0.125 1 2.146 98.062 14.459 19 LW2 70.098 0.441 2.049 0.021 0.054 0.117 1.827 87.348 12.834 20 SAB1 84.246 0.473 2.173 0.023 0.063 0.125 2.146 98.062 14.459 21 SA132 84.237 0.473 2.173 0.023 0.063 0.125 2.145 98.052 14.457 22 SAB3 84.246 0.473 2.173 0.023 0.063 0.125 2.146 98.062 1 14.459 23 SA64 84.246 1 0.473 2.173 1 0.023 0.063 0.125 2.146 98.062 14.459 25 OVERALL 84.156 1 0.472 2.172 1 0.023 0.063 1 0.125 1 2.144 97.959 1 14.443 Page 18 WA1074.08P8 tables- EAST2SHOREAST-2- P8 outflow -wqc (7) City of Shorewood Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan Purgatory Creek Watersheds -P8 Results •`: s, '� .,.. ,. •..'' " „.,, x: n.,t. ... �x� ,. ,.Yf t!✓ :,.;,,, T «mE ... �L,tt/!� ..o.. ...-u ��:.. <...a ec.,mT ,.. .�.,.� -._,. .. z.... PC 1 .,.a_sr r, .d. .,... .. ' M ._ :,s .tn. . , .,.,. s;;,�s, .... w �`r`. 1 s.: -.. � { . .. G;�..,_ Ys°.; €E ibaE'e , e: - . 'f;n. `. +.t w?¢ ". 0� ::: - ;t .. �....... < >..,.,'*'� > °x >,xkrs v,.es>< 4.9 A ' ., , >,:< „ �XVSS.7 _. Y`f„ c..'..... ... .'n • €.t ,:: p ,..... £,�,a H -r -., .,. 0.380 £� -:.3 x� `m t,,.....< ! P ile ..,d '4 €.... .�v,�ar.«, ...,w. 61 � . :� x s . "., I.. t -':V �+M4•ki .'' , .,: g d!N �Y '. ....ccw. er� .tsv.axii�•!t �s. ati....�, 1 f.E {1 r .. f. be. i a::s y`a# i .-<. F€••...: naw' F nE.. - ,.,.�H...,.tr.<�.. srE ,in.�ePPs.B .._� yJ.'.�. 7 r]p] ; r. l 4 F - ,.... .., o >Y, 7 $'9T re. .P. y» � `: t+i, ^•r ^ �` .;... Sv. {,. ., z , `^.. y t« a v�.$�.. a .ad, 0.2 : '- ,:'. ,. .• �� a �� fd a1- 3 '. is :, �a•l, r� 0.4 . �.`` G E v ..!€. 3:r> ! A 2.5�-'•v _z:gz' ; ' %i , 3f � e§es .,,F <.°3`�' 0.6 . S `fi`1�7.. L'£.., € d. F � b •. - 6 �€�a, 1.9 F d.. � - ", ni,.�.ir 6.9 PC2 2 10.3 0.353 61 2 3 0.1 0.2 3.9 11.8 8.7 PC3 3 18.1 0.380 61 3 5 - -- 1.0 2.2 3.9 6.1 PC4 4 19.3 0.318 66 4 5 0.5 0.8 0.9 0.9 2.9 PC5 5 20.2 0.311 67 5 6 0.5 1.0 5.9 15.3 7.5 PC6 6 183 0.380 61 6 7 21.6 24.0 27.0 127.5 12.4 PC7 7 16.3 0.327 61 7 11 - -- 0.0 2.9 11.7 54.3 PC8 8 11.8 0.100 68 8 11 0.4 1.6 5.9 50.7 13.6 PC9 9 26.9 0.380 61 9 10 0.1 0.7 2.1 4.9 6.5 PC10 10 65.9 0.353 61 10 11 0.2 0.5 13.7 65.0 94.1 PC11 11 64.3 0.407 61 11 out 0.5 1.0 13.5 28.7 101.0 PC12 12 3.0 0.380 61 12 out - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- PC13 13 10.0 0.380 68 13 out - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- PC14* 1 14 245.7 0.407 61 14 11 - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- PC15" 1 15 104.2 1 0.461 61 1 15 1 6 - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- Subwatershed PC 14 represents the area in Minnetonka that contributes stormwater to Shorewood. Likewise, subwatershed PC 15 represents the area in Chanhassen that is tributary to Silver Lake. Note: Storage is the flood pool available to 100 year HWL. Peak Discharge is the 100 year basin outflow. Page 19 W: \1074.08 \P8 tables- EAST3SHOREAST -3 -P8 INPUT (1) City o, Shorewood Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan Purgatory Creek Watersheds -P8 Results PERCENT REMOVAL EFFICIENCY OF TREATMENT DEVICE FOR EACH PARTICLE CLASS *` J6° $ vhry b'AGxre v f� 1 PC1 'yl' C �.. c 0 80.7 93.3 3 97 99.7 2 PC2 0 54.7 80.3 92.5 99.3 3 PC3 0 32.2 81.1 95.9 99.6 4 PC4 0 64.3 82.8 92.9 99.3 5 PC5 0 49.7 82.5 95.9 99.7 6 PC6 0 76.9 97.5 99.5 100 7 PC7 0 3.4 25.6 63.4 94.7 8 PC8 0 94.9 99.1 99.8 100 9 PC9 0 58 82 94.4 99.5 10 PC10 0 24.1 57.1 84 98.2 11 PC11 0 8.1 40.2 76.1 97.1 12 PC12 0 0 0 0 0 13 PC13 0 0 0 0 0 14 PC14 0 0 0 1 0 0 15 PC15 0 0 0 0 0 25 OVERALL 0 45.3 71.1 88.3 97.2 Page 20 W:\1074.08 \P8 tables- EAMSHOREAST -3 -P8 %rem -pc (2) City of Shorewood Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan Purgatory Creek Watersheds -P8 Results PERCENT REMOVAL EFFICIENCY OF TREATMENT DEVICE FOR EACH WATER QUALITY COMPONENT a, c R,✓<az^` s -,.ice 9 .�'5....' �.: _. , k Div, s§ jr �. 3�...: S">�,� :' g.�5.., 4"�F ,.�....� z`S�_ , E- .�. :,•4. 'c3x E x ,; �y :� s?n..w' . , " .rise s�;�.'c�'_.,.. ' ;4, R'.. t ` la'�,'k } •..:- x w k._ , x. 5... :. Y :'s : �t�xlpt I i i G x vwuaa .. ... S,f 1 �e �v ,. �b ;v,.... 4, . , . xv > .¥ �' 7 �a. r1" s w r .MUr�a � .. ,. 3.. e f z,k: i t 4 :€s- . ,. - ,.a t l 1 ` �c x hr . S�.? sr.a., t ip ` 2 ..ad w.a, ' ::� 1 PC1 94.1 60.3 50.9 50.9 83.3 50.9 813 87.5 88.1 2 PC2 85.2 50.3 42.3 42.3 75.3 42.3 75.3 71.9 73.1 3 PC3 79.6 40.8 33.4 33.4 67.5 33.4 67.5 59.1 61.3 4 PC4 87.5 51.1 42.6 42.6 76.3 42.6 76.3 76.6 77.5 5 PC5 78.8 33.1 25.6 25.6 58.9 25.6 58.9 62.4 63.9 6 PC6 94.6 57.7 48 48 82.1 48 82.1 86.4 87.3 7 PC7 32.9 5 3.6 3.6 18.4 3.6 18.4 13.4 14.4 8 PC8 98.8 64.8 54.5 54.5 87.2 54.5 87.2 95.8 95.9 9 PC9 86.7 51.8 43.6 43.6 76.6 43.6 76.6 74.1 75.2 10 PC10 70.5 32.5 26.7 26.7 60.1 26.7 60.1 49.3 50.9 11 PC11 59.6 22 17.8 17.8 49.4 17.8 49.4 34.8 36.4 12 PC12 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 13 PC13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 PC14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 PC15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 OVERALL 79.9 1 45.2 38.1 1 38.1 70.5 38.1 70.5 64.8 1 65.9 Page 21 WA1074.08P8 tables- EAST3SHOREAST -3 -PS % rem -wqc (3) City of Shorewood Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan Purgatory Creek Watersheds -P8 Results CONCENTRATION (PPM) PRESENT IN THE INFLOW OF EACH TREATMENT DEVICE FOR EACH PARTICLE CLASS Page 22 M1074.08WO tables- EAST3SHOREAST -3 -P8 ]NFL-pc (4) F 4" t F � S - as i 3 tiS. 3 9F 5 2 aF`ri 4a69tia < nfuss'YEu3t 3 "hKk�t'$"•yt > st as. =j a��� ��"xr 1fl "Icy h`. t V� aJ� OK A ,e 1 PC1 1 17.185 17.185 17.185 34.37 2 PC2 1 16.849 16.849 16.849 33.699 3 PC3 0.961 13.637 12.171 11.458 22.132 4 PC4 0.872 13.659 13.252 13.105 26 5 PC5 0.89 9.771 5.998 4.785 8.663 6 PC6 0.962 14.768 14.105 13.957 27.851 7 PC7 0.422 3.064 0.958 0.682 1 1.24 8 PC8 1 16.74 16.74 16.74 33.48 9 PC9 1 16.849 16.849 16.849 33.699 10 PC10 0.97 13.861 12.633 11.995 23.465 11 PC 11 0.716 9.482 7.856 7.253 13.927 12 PC12 1 16.849 16.849 16.849 33.699 13 PC13 1 16.829 16.829 16.829 33.659 14 PC14 1 16.849 16.849 16.849 33.699 15 PC15 1 16.849 16.849 16.849 33.699 25 OVERALL 1 16.851 16.851 16.851 33.701 Page 22 M1074.08WO tables- EAST3SHOREAST -3 -P8 ]NFL-pc (4) City of Shorewood Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan Purgatory Creek Watersheds -P8 Results CONCENTRATION (PPM) PRESENT IN THE INFLOW OF EACH TREATMENT DEVICE FOR EACH WATER QUALITY COMPONENT ,� , yC ! ' ,, 4� S 1 ,t '� ._ , '^'£ PC1 A¢¢yyy ��`•' ' W q G 85.924 .Yr, E Y k wax d 0.479 L ayE w`YxR....A 3, °5�.. k 2.197 i' _ ffi- k, Yxe�'!. 6 'L s�R:.u� 0.023 'd CY,y�� 'v v. 0.064 `Sh "Y' Y a' S t'2� , �-a6 0.126 tE#b4. 1 �S�gR ,� t J i 2 2.183 I. 9" i t .. q' g 99.983 'i q ty -� v 14.742 2 PC2 84.246 0.473 2.173 0.023 0.063 0.125 2.146 98.062 14.459 3 PC3 59.398 0.384 1.817 0.019 0.046 0.104 1.577 73.54 10.786 4 PC4 66.016 0.387 1.797 0.019 0.05 0.103 1.703 78.001 11.485 5 PC5 29.217 0.269 1.348 0.014 0.026 0.077 0.88 43.492 6.267 6 PC6 70.682 0.419 1.952 0.02 0.054 0.112 1.831 83.82 12.333 7 PC7 5.944 0.096 0.518 0.005 0.007 0.03 0.239 11.403 1.601 8 PC8 83.7 0.471 2.165 0.023 0.063 0.124 2.133 97.436 14.366 9 PC9 84.246 0.473 2.173 0.023 0.063 0.125 2.146 98.062 14.459 10 PC10 61.954 0.393 1.855 0.019 0.048 0.106 1.636 75.827 11.132 11 PC11 38.518 0.267 1.277 0.013 0.031 0.073 1.046 49.199 7.191 12 PC12 84.246 0.473 2.173 0.023 0.063 0.125 2.146 98.062 14.459 13 PC13 84.147 0.472 2.172 0.023 0.063 0.125 2.143 97.948 14.442 14 PC14 84.246 0.473 2.173 0.023 0.063 0.125 2.146 98.062 14.459 15 PC15 84.246 0.473 2.173 0.023 0.063 0.125 2.146 98.062 14.459 25 OVERALL 84.253 0.473 2.173 0.023 0.063 0.125 2.146 98.069 14.46 Page 23 W: \1074.08P8 tables- EAST3SHOREAST -3 -P8 INFLOW -wqc (5) City of Shorewood Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan Purgatory Creek Watersheds-P8 Results CONCENTRATION (PPM) PRESENT IN THE OUTFLOW OF EACH TREATMENT DEVICE FOR EACH PARTICLE CLASS eIX 00 Nwwi n M N 012 - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 PCI 0.44 2.929 1.153 0.514 0.105 2 PC2 0.886 7.56 3.323 1.261 0.251 3 PC3 0.961 9.239 2.303 0.469 0.089 4 PC4 0.709 4.86 2.292 0.942 0.181 5 PC5 0.784 4.866 1.05 0.197 0.028 6 PC6 0.4 2.543 0.357 0.07 0.012 7 PC7 0.42 2.958 0.714 0.249 0.066 8 PC8 0.111 0.552 0.152 0.037 0.006 9 PC9 0.902 7.058 3.035 0.945 0.169 10 PC10 0.956 10.51 5.42 1.916 0.413 11 PC1 1 0.708 8.698 4.696 1,734 0.411 12 PC12 0.999 16.848 16.848 16.848 33.697 13 PC13 1 16.829 16.829 16.829 33.658 PC14 1 16.849 16.849 16.849 33.698 PC15 1 16,849 16.849 16.849 33,698 OVERALL 0.713 8.827 1 4.888 1.973 0.938 Page 24 W:\1074,08\P8 tables- EAST3S HOR EAST- 3-P8 OUTFL-pc (6) City of Shorewood Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan Purgatory Creek Watersheds-P8 Results CONCENTRATION (PPM) PRESENT IN THE OUTFLOW OF EACH TREATMENT DEVICE FOR EACH WATER QUALITY COMPONENT P Ma" �m 'x, ,. ,i ki `$2x','i 1 . � _. �za �'a .. ��'',.� ''SFF ii!3z` R2 habw PCI '� � v F. ��� .. t*'.�: ��� . �;. €+ 4 t t 1:� .a`£�`i 4.701 �. Y �' � k 0.099 4'' � '*i ��ak i4 `�'.i` X Vf'I rte" ' 0.533 L.,$�.F- K''ox�t�� {ti1F1'. � >, 0.006 � _�: � w t" - t �« ..'te ,v 0.006 { dY '. y g a�y�: e�x�'� ; r 0.031 'n4 ' �� ' i 0.216 - x tx3. 4�+� 10.529 ' � j% � . . � i 1.484 2 PC2 12.394 0.217 1.142 0.012 0.015 0.065 0.5 27.152 3.838 3 PC3 12.101 0.228 1.21 0.013 0.015 0.069 0.512 30.114 4.172 4 PC4 8.275 0.163 0.875 0.009 0.011 0.05 0.364 17.95 2.546 5 PC5 6.14 0.163 0.9 0.009 0.01 0.052 0.334 16.058 2.222 6 PC6 2.982 0.082 0.455 0.005 0.005 0.026 0.167 8,124 1.114 7 PC7 3.987 0.091 0.498 0.005 0.006 0.029 0.195 9.87 1.369 8 PC8 0.747 0.022 0.124 0.001 0.001 0.007 0.044 1.906 0.266 9 PC9 11.208 0.212 1.131 0.012 0.014 0.065 0.478 25.212 3.56 10 PC10 18.259 0.263 1.346 0.014 0.019 0.077 0.65 38.414 5.462 11 PC1 1 15.539 0.207 1.043 0.011 0.015 0,06 0.527 32.044 4.565 12 PC12 84.242 0.473 2.172 0.023 0.063 0.125 2.145 98.055 14.458 13 PC13 84.145 0,472 2.171 0.023 0.063 0.124 2.143 97.946 14.441 14 PC14 84.246 0.473 2.173 0.023 0.063 0.125 2.146 98.062 14.459 15 PC15 84.245 0.473 2.173 0.023 0.063 0.125 2.145 98.06 14.458 25 OVERALL 16.626 0.211 1.0611 0.0111 0.016 0.0611 0.5521 33.088 4.721 Page 25 WA1074.08P8 tables-EAMSHOREAST-3-P8 outflow-wqc (7) City of Shorewood Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan West, Lake Virginia, West - Central, Lake Minnewashta, South - Central, Central, and Lake Mary Watersheds -P8 Results :. »-„-. .,¢,��✓P ,.ate .. .he.R ... .,. ` t .. :< �.1y4 tP5 :3._.l��f wY.: W1 z. .: tr... - .sw.�:�2`4" ..fit, .�v a b� 1 eta 4 'S 3 = � .: R.:� E?x " nf. ..:.. ., s= i ll .:.. ���n<�. .. .�.k1�.;.. Wj 2 a f�.,N�..in 62.1 ... '.:f , _ , S ... i„f.. .,. ... ,tv';. [.. r�,,,=..:.;. <. �,..� ..v. ..:�� . -,�.: 0.250 ;.rw .;'..,. . ,. s, �., .. , „ C, _ t$, �..., W'�1.- =c'4r.,.4:.mL.•�;3 61 .... -' . '.. 1.. ��1 .... rk �.., ., .. >.. .� ..- u .. -.. ., . <. ,,..: ....:...: t'."C� 1 1 h f ix. \.: �S� ., c .day, � '}`'.,�• f� ... �1.. ki .'::n 13,. f.. : ..... ;: U�s k�•, „.. _ �: '.,:i .. ".a� 78 J' x... 1E d.. ch ,6 e,. ,: x`�...,,k b.Y4. 3 N� `ktr .r. ., -zsY., »�2.. t kS. (. -.:E 1.0 e �b..s.�,21.3f�!�,", ,n .Si;.......a7 ;Y .k 5t'F' q ' . tins R y 5. a' 4.5 :..+`r�.4,.� y.•Ttr. $ .Y� 6.5 4Q 24... O aar 13.2 A � � ..: at ofs 16.9 W2 2 21.6 0.120 61 2 3 1.0 3.0 4.2 3.6 21.8 (1) W3 3 64.9 0.200 61 3 out - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- LV1 4 22.1 0.200 71 4 5 0.5 0.7 4.7 11.3 19.3 (1) LV2 5 116.6 0.235 70 5 out - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- WC1 6 49.6 0.200 71 6 7 3.0 5.0 6.4 3.5 16.9 WC2 7 106.6 0.250 74 7 8 - -- 0.0 1.5 4.1 18.5 WC3 8 44.5 0.120 74 8 9 - -- 0.0 1.0 1.5 92.7 WC4 9 106.5 0.220 69 9 11 0.5 1.0 10.2 5.2 145.4 WC5 10 50.8 0.160 74 10 1 8 0.0 0.0 9.5 5.6 5.4 WC6 11 316.4 0.226 70 11 out 59.7 77.7 113.7 164.6 20.2 (1) WC7 12 69.3 0.147 60 12 out - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- C1 13 137.1 0.225 61 13 16 2.0 10.1 20.3 30.4 9.9 C2 14 10.1 0.300 67 14 13 - -- 1.0 1.7 2.3 2,0 LMAR 1 15 32.7 0.250 61 15 16 2.0 2.3 3.2 24.8 3.6 LMAR 2 16 61.8 0.334 61 16 1 out 6.9 11.7 16.4 54.8 6.0 SC1 17 6.2 0.310 68 17 18 - -- 0.7 1.5 5.9 2.8 SC2 18 37.7 0.310 61 18 out 4.9 5.8 8.1 56.5 7.4 (2) SC3 19 28.0 0.327 61 19 18 - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- LMIN1 20 26.0 0.253 68 20 out - -- 0.0 7.4 26.9 42.5 LMIN2 21 16.7 0.353 61 21 out - -- 0.0 0.7 2.5 59.5 LMIN3 22 6.7 0.327 61 22 out - -- 0.1 1 0.2 1 0.5 11.0 LMIN4 23 18.4 0.320 61 23 out - -- 0.0 1 3.5 1 2.3 24.0 Note: Storage is the flood pool available to 100 year HWL. Peak Discharge is the 100 year basin outflow. Page 26 W: \1074.08 \P8 tables- WESTISHORWEST -1 -P8 INPUT (1) City L horewood Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan West, Lake Virginia, West-Central, Lake Minnewashta, South-Central, Central, and Lake Mary Watersheds-P8 Results PERCENT REMOVAL EFFICIENCY OF TREATMENT DEVICE FOR EACH PARTICLE CLASS Page 27 WA1074.08\P8 tables-WESTlSHORWEST-1-P8 %rem-pc (2) orng Filt 1 11 1131"N"I 4134i�'fi 0111 1 wi 0 85.9 97.4 99.5 100 2 W2 0 94 99.2 99.8 100 3 W3 0 0 0 0 0 4 LV1 0 49.5 81 95.5 99.6 5 LV2 0 0 b 0 0 6 WC 0 87 96.7 99.4 99.9 7 WC2 0 3.4 25.2 62.6 94.5 8 WC3 0 0.5 4.3 18.2 69.7 9 WC4 0 26 66.1 go 99 10 WC5 0 7.5 44.6 80.1 97.6 11 WC6 0 88.6 99.2 99.9 100 12 WC7 0 0 0 0 0 13 C1 0 86.7 97.7 99.5 100 14 C2 0 70.3 96.5 99.4 99.9 15 LMAR1 0 82.4 96.7 99.1 99.9 16 LmAR2 0 80 97.8 99.6 100 17 Sci 0 68.7 96.2 99.3 99.9 18 SC2 0 81.7 97.2 99.4 100 19 SC3 0 0 0 0 0 20 LMIN1 0 1.3 11.7 39 86.1 21 LMIN2 0 0.6 5.7 20.7 68.9 22 LMIN3 0 11.9 51.4 83.7 98.1 23 LMIN4 0 5.1 34.8 72.8 96.4 25 OVERALL 0 69.8 78.5 80.9 83 Page 27 WA1074.08\P8 tables-WESTlSHORWEST-1-P8 %rem-pc (2) City of Shorewood Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan West, Lake Virginia, West-Central, Lake Minnewashta, South-Central, Central, and Lake Mary Watersheds-P8 Results PERCENT REMOVAL EFFICIENCY OF TREATMENT DEVICE FOR EACH WATER QUALITY COMPONENT �F L > . s € 1 ? Z" r� . .� a.... W1 �� �, Sx` G -. �', .iM.: ............ 96.5 M � S ;'^ g g 62.5 52.6 'Ai AV I$ rw 52.6 85.3 v" i g 52.6 85.3 01 91.1 91.6 2 W2 98.6 64.7 54.5 54.5 1 87.1 54.5 87.1 95.4 95.6 3 W3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 LV1 85 49.4 41.5 41.5 74.9 41.5 74.9 69.9 71.4 5 LV2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 WC1 96.6 61.9 52 52 85 52 85 91.4 91.8 7 WC2 55.5 18.2 14.9 14.9 47.4 14.9 47.4 31.4 32.5 8 WC3 14.2 2.8 2.2 2.2 10.7 2.2 10.7 5.7 6 9 WC4 66.3 31.9 25.8 25.8 53.5 25.8 53.5 46.1 48.1 10 WC5 65.5 28.1 23.4 23.4 57 23.4 57 40.5 42.2 11 WC6 96.6 53.1 42.7 42.7 78.8 42.7 78.8 91 91.4 12 WC7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 C1 96.7 60.9 50.9 50.9 84.5 50.9 84.5 91.4 91.8 14 C2 93.2 58.8 49.5 49.5 82.4 49.5 82.4 83.5 84.7 15 LMARI 95.6 61.5 51.8 51.8 84.5 51.8 84.5 89.3 89.9 16 LMAR2 94.8 49.9 39.8 39.8 77.4 39.8 77.4 86.7 87.4 17 SCI 92.8 58.4 49.1 49.1 82 49.1 82 82.7 83.9 18 SC2 95.6 59.8 50 50 83.6 50 83.6 88.9 89.5 19 SC3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 LMIN1 44.9 11.5 9.7 9.7 39.6 9.7 1 39.6 24.4 25 21 LMIN2 33 6 5 5 29.1 5 29.1 17.5 17.8 22 LMIN3 68.6 32.5 27.3 27.3 60.6 27.3 60.6 44.5 46.3 23 LMIN4 61.1 24.9 21 21 54 21 54 36.4 37.8 25 OVERALL 79.2 50.3 42.3 42.3 69.8 42.3 69.8 74.3 74.7 Page 28 W:\1074.08P8 tables-WESTISHORWEST-I-N %Fem-wqc (3) City of Shorewood Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan West, Lake Virginia, West - Central, Lake Minnewashta, South - Central, Central, and Lake Mary Watersheds -1 Results CONCENTRATION (PPM) PRESENT IN THE INFLOW OF EACH TREATMENT DEVICE FOR EACH PARTICLE CLASS y a + _w 1 a ua guar .b e k e �� q ��Wy'c� W1 a. Y'''t'i' d{ n x5E 1 i @s3a 16.849 a v.�q r '. 16.849 16.849 E F d . 33.699 2 W2 1 16.849 16.849 16.849 33.698 3 W3 0.638 8.171 7.264 7.08 14.073 4 LV1 1 16.338 16.338 16.338 32.677 5 LV2 1 15.425 14.7 14.366 28.546 6 WC1 1 16.338 16.338 16.338 32.677 7 WC2 0.899 12.164 11.743 11.628 23.208 8 WC3 0.926 12.406 9.342 5.277 4.364 9 WC4 0.948 13.665 11.293 8.078 11.062 10 WC5 1 15.042 15.042 15.042 30.084 11 WC6 0.968 13.233 9.984 8.424 16.066 12 WC7 1 16.849 16.849 16.849 33.699 13 C1 1 15.789 15.395 15.352 30.686 14 C2 1 16.847 16.847 16.847 33.695 15 LMAR1 1 16.849 16.849 16.849 33.699 16 LMAR2 0.596 6.872 5.815 5.605 11.104 17 SC1 1 16.822 16.822 16.822 33.644 18 SC2 1 15.869 1 15.478 15.435 30.851 19 SC3 1 16.849 16.849 16.849 33.699 20 LMIN1 1 16.813 16.813 16.813 33.626 21 LMIN2 1 16.849 16.849 16.849 33.699 22 LMIN3 1 16.849 16.849 16.849 33.698 23 LMIN4 1 16.849 16.849 16.849 33.699 25 OVERALL 1 16.548 16.548 16.548 33.096 Page 29 W: \1074.08 \P8 tables- WESTISHORWEST -I -P8 INFL -pc (4) City of Shorewood Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan West, Lake Virginia, West-Central, Lake Minnewashta, South-Central, Central, and Lake Mary Watersheds-P8 Results CONCENTRATION (PPM) PRESENT IN THE INFLOW OF EACH TREATMENT DEVICE FOR EACH WATER QUALITY COMPONENT 2 ," ' jl ' 01 I 703w W1 84.246 0.473 2.173 0.023 0.063 0.125 2.146 98.062 14.459 2 W2 84.246 0.473 2.173 0.023 0.063 0.125 2.146 98.062 1 14.459 3 W3 36.588 0.241 1.153 0.012 0.029 0.666 0.983 44.729 6.56 4 LV1 81.692 0.463 2.136 0.022 0.061 0.122 2.088 95.136 14.027 5 LV2 73.036 0.435 2.027 0.021 0.056 0.116 1.893 87.056 12.808 6 WC1 81.692 0.463 2.136 0.022 0.061 0.122 2.088 95.136 14.027 7 WC2 58.743 0.364 1.716 0.018 0.045 0.098 1.546 69.593 10.245 8 WC3 31.389 0.315 1.538 0.016 0.028 0.088 0.938 52.626 7.631 9 WC4 44.098 0.356 1.703 0.018 0.036 0.098 1.229 64.063 9.346 10 WC5 75.209 0.439 2.043 0,021 0.057 0.117 1.942 87.711 12.933 11 WC6 47.708 0.35 1.689 0.018 0.039 0.097 1.316 64.46 9.377 12 WC7 84.246 0.473 2.173 0.023 0.063 0.125 2.146 98.062 14.459 13 C1 77.222 0.448 2.077 0.022 0.058 0.119 1.987 90.735 13.363 14 C2 84.237 0.473 2.173 0.023 0.063 0.125 2.145 98.052 14.457 15 LMAR1 84.246 0.473 2.173 0.023 0.063 0.125 2.146 98.062 14.459 16 LMAR2 29.396 0.208 1.012 0.011 0.024 0.058 0.81 36.722 5.374 17 Sci 84.11 0.472 2.171 0.023 0.063 0.124 2,142 97.906 14.436 18 SC2 77.633 0.449 2.083 0.022 0.059 0.119 1.997 91.201 13.432 19 SC3 84.246 0.473 2.173 0.023 0.063 0.125 2.146 98.062 14.459 20 LMIN1 84.066 0.472 2.171 0.023 0.063 0.124 2.141 97.856 14.428 21 LMIN2 84.246 0.473 2.173 0.023 0.063 0.125 2.146 98.062 14.459 22 LMIN3 84.246 0.473 2.173 0.023 0.063 0.125 2.146 98.062 14.459 23 LMIN4 84.246 1 0.473 1 2.173 0.023 0.063 0.125 2.146 98.062 14.459 25 OVERALL 82.739 1 0.467 1 2.151 0.023 0.062 0.123 2.112 1 96.3354 14.204 Page 30 W:\1074.08P8 tables-WESTISHORVVEST-1-P8 INFLOW-wqc (5) City of Shorewood Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan West, Lake Virginia, West - Central, Lake Minnewashta, South - Central, Central, and Lake Mary Watersheds -P8 Results CONCENTRATION (PPM) PRESENT IN THE OUTFLOW OF EACH TREATMENT DEVICE FOR EACH PARTICLE CLASS �.rY 44 br�� �� �r� ga0 3M "e 4,a. r7 f� ss}vc a ���� +i SUM t F fi �w i' i ki a t A t 3 � 1 W1 0.422 2.175 0.44 0.09 0.013 2 W2 0.124 0.625 0.142 0.032 0.005 3 W3 0.638 8.171 7.264 7.08 14.073 4 LV1 0.998 8.249 3.103 0.729 0.14 5 LV2 1 15.425 14.7 14.366 28.546 6 WC1 0.618 2.131 0.536 0.1 0.016 7 WC2 0.899 11.752 8.78 4.35 1.278 8 WC3 0.926 12.336 8.931 4.316 1.319 9 WC4 0.939 10.104 3.825 0.81 0.108 10 WC5 0.99 13.781 8.257 2.968 0.725 11 WC6 0.175 0.827 0.081 0.012 0.002 12 WC7 1 16.849 16.849 16.849 33.698 13 C1 0.419 1.939 0.361 0.07 0.011 14 C2 1 4.999 0.586 0.108 0.021 15 LMAR1 0.313 2.126 0.555 0.154 0.024 16 LMAR2 0.234 1.11 0.129 0.022 0.004 17 SC1 0.999 5.258 0.635 0.12 0.024 18 SC2 0.341 2.12 0.432 0.098 0.014 19 SC3 1 16.849 16.849 16.849 33.698 20 LM I N 1 1 16.589 14.84 10.259 4.664 21 LMIN2 1.003 16.797 15.947 13.411 1 10.52 22 LMIN3 1 14.853 8.186 2.753 0.641 23 LMIN4 1 15.992 10.979 4.587 1.215 25 OVERALL 0.399 4.551 1 3.575 1 3.173 5.516 Page 31 W:11074.081P8 tables- WEST1SHORWEST -I -P8 OUTFL -pc (6) City of Shorewood Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan West, Lake Virginia, West-Central, Lake Minnewashta, South-Central, Central, and Lake Mary Watersheds-P8 Results CONCENTRATION (PPM) PRESENT IN THE OUTFLOW OF EACH TREATMENT DEVICE FOR EACH WATER QUALITY COMPONENT q�" - Iggig 't�fi"t�1'x I y` (��1��' � W1 2i; I'M 0311";16 11 raj No 2.717 X a 0.084 ' � 0.47 P_ gpy-.?m gw"". 0.005 0.005 11 _' 0.027 '�N x+ _4 0,167 7.254 1.003 2 W2 0.803 0.025 0.138 0.001 0.001 0.008 0.049 2.111 0.293 3 W3 36.588 0.241 1.153 0.012 0,029 0.066 0.983 44.729 6.56 4 LVI 12.221 0.234 1,248 0.013 0.015 0.072 0.524 28.586 4.015 5 LV2 73.036 0.435 2.027 0.021 0.056 0.116 1.893 87.055 12.808 6 WC1 2.783 0.116 0.66 0.007 0.006 0.038 0.217 7.564 1.055 7 WC2 2616 0.298 1.46 0.015 0.024 0.084 0.813 47.747 6.914 8 WC3 26.902 0.306 1.503 0.016 0,025 0.086 0.837 49.587 7.169 9 WC4 14.847 0.241 1.255 0.013 0.017 0,072 0.569 34,515 4.844 10 WC5 25.731 0.313 1.551 0.016 0.024 0.089 0.827 51.724 7.403 11 WC6 0.922 0.034 0.19 0.002 0.002 0.01 1 0.064 2.661 0.364 12 WC7 84.245 0,473 2.173 0.023 0.063 0.125 1 2.145 98.061 14.458 13 C1 2.38 0.081 0.459 0.005 0.005 0.158 6,489 0.897 14 C2 5.715 0.195 1.097 0.011 0.011 0.063 0.379 16.148 2.214 15 LMAR1 2.859 0.068 0.369 0.004 0.004 0.021 0.143 7.132 0.991 16 LMAR2 1.265 0.045 0.255 1 0.003 0.003 0,015 0,087 3,602 0.494 17 SCI 6,037 0.197 1.104 0.012 0.011 0.063 0.386 16.928 2.321 18 SC2 2.666 0.071 0.391 0.004 0.004 0.022 1 0.145 6.975 0,964 19 SC3 84.245 0.473 2.173 0.023 0.063 0.125 2.145 98.06 14.458 20 LMIN1 46.351 0.418 1.96 0.021 0,038 0.112 1.293 74.022 10.829 21 LMIN2 56.675 0.446 2.071 0.022 0.045 0.119 1.526 81,222 11.928 22 LMIN3 26.434 0.319 1,579 0.017 0.025 0.091 0.845 54.437 1 7.759 23 LMIN4 32,772 0.355 1.717 0.018 0.029 1 0.098 0.987 62.364 8.98 25 _F OVERALL 16.815 0.134 0.654 0.007 0.014 1 0.038 1 0.478 22.599 3.294 Page 32 WA1074,08P8 tables-WESTlSHORWEST-I-P8 outflow -wqc (7) City of Shorewood Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan Gideon Bay, North - Central, and Lake Minnetonka Watersheds -P8 Results ,f .3.. pp -3 .�-3' k. 5 }a. PUMA .,.. - •:xe i sy u ::.. -�•.,. ,{ >S-� ,F .,�... .. . <, xk. �5, E yz...:: d :.s -a_.. r '1:�2 ,....... n, e � r� k ,. `,k . a�.+"T:. - r�1....���,3..�' GB 1 x. ..` . ,>L " I M" r's ` >. .,. _. , C .. .. <.. .... .. z. ,♦.' : L... i ,,l ; 3_ .. �f'G: . r. �. 1 w ..,+kr. s .:xe. .'ss i.. ... 16.4 3:. i .. ,.... �` �. _._ }f3' Ate.. W -:: 0.353 ¢ , � . .- ......>,.�k.. . >.....�.. .., .., ,� ,. ..., e _Yz 61 _. � .. . } .fi a .> -z: s rY } _�,. �.... .. .. {s ,- r.'.:_ : ✓. 1 � L 2 � .. _:. Ss w . .n i �. k' x .: <.,. . >, ... , + „r.:.. r = ,:_.:, � ,��, e ;: + G •''a �!. p:..:, � ���/ .j L3 ., N .. t y 2 x G�. '3 ..�*,. r �' ..S:pi'R: b. i`. ::.G n ,..:_ zt . 5w c . t , Bofom, - -- r- ^vla'.H :n<>� � .... ,. ..;. -#w :;a` 0.5 M ! 2 3 a 2 >s t ..>t' �tl ,..:f9 hE•.> 'r .a ,. H1NL 1.8 ,5, '; , 51`. '' t ` Y� acr eef 2.9 3 f F �j l� Q p � Y; g, fe cfs 6.0 GB 2 2 1 27.5 0.460 61 2 4 0.20 0.4 1.3 2.6 28.5 GB 3 3 34.9 0.300 61 3 out - -- 0.4 1.2 1.7 17.7 GB 4 4 11.9 0.535 61 4 out - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- GB 5 5 13.3 0.120 61 5 6 - -- 0.0 1.0 0.59 15.7 GB 6 6 24.3 0.120 68 6 7 - -- 0.1 2.7 6.6 27.8 GB 7 7 29.4 0.380 61 7 out - -- 0.7 4.3 15 10.7 GB 8 8 74.7 0.407 61 8 out - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- GB 9 9 14.3 0.407 61 9 out 0.50 1.6 3.3 9.7 4.1 GB 10 10 1 36.5 0.434 61 10 out - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- NC 1 11 16.5 0.300 71 11 12 - -- 0.0 0.8 1.01 37.1 NC 2 12 39.4 0.240 71 12 13 - -- 0.5 4.0 9.8 7.0 NC 3 13 18.5 0.300 61 13 14 0.05 0.1 0.2 0.52 61.6 NC 4 14 27.9 0.210 68 14 21 0.01 0.0 0.5 0.9 103.4 NC 5 15 1 20.0 0.310 65 15 21 0.08 0.1 1.3 3.13 24.8 NC 6 16 6.4 0.250 61 16 17 - -- 0.6 0.8 1 2.1 NC 7 17 12.6 0.310 66 17 20 0.80 2.7 3.2 2.4 12.3 NC 8 18 6.6 0.327 61 18 19 0.58 1.1 2.0 10.9 1.4 NC 9 19 24.8 0.353 61 19 20 3.70 5.0 5.3 16.4 2.5 NC 10 20 47.6 0.380 61 20 out 2.00 3.3 6.0 7 16.7 11 21 69.3 0.300 72 21 out - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- 12 22 20.0 1 0.300 1 72 22 out - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- 13 1 23 1 2.0 1 0.300 1 72 1 23 out I - -- - -- - -- - -- I - -- Note: Storage is the flood pool available to 100 year HWL. Peak Discharge is the 100 year basin outflow. Page 33 W: \1074.08 \P8 tables- WEST2SHORWEST -2 -P6 INPUT (1) City t- jhorewood Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan Gideon Bay, North-Central, and Lake Minnetonka Watersheds-P8 Results PERCENT REMOVAL EFFICIENCY OF TREATMENT DEVICE FOR EACH PARTICLE CLASS Page 34 W:\1074.08\P8 tables-WEMSHORWEST-2-P8 %rem-pc (2) A RUP 111 1,t"� ' � z 1 1 N4 "M V .. . . ........... _ q r Fe F 1 G131 0 38.3 84.9 97 99.7 2 G132 0 32.6 66.5 88.7 98.9 1 3 G133 0 50.8 92.9 99.7 100 4 G134 0 0 0 0 0 5 G135 0 2 14.4 41.3 86.4 6 G136 0 8.7 44.1 79.6 97.7 7 G137 0 37.6 84.3 97 99.7 8 G138 0 0 0 0 0 9 G139 0 84.4 94.3 97.5 99.7 10 GB10 0 0 0 0 0 11 NC1 0 2.8 22.2 58.3 93.3 12 NC2 0 29.7 78.7 95.5 99.6 13 NC3 0 5.2 19.2 49.3 90.6 14 NC4 0 0.8 5.6 22.1 73.8 15 NC5 0 23 51 71.1 95.3 16 NC6 0 58.5 93.8 98.8 99.9 17 NC7 0 89.6 96.8 98.8 99.9 18 NC8 0 88.6 97.1 99 99.9 19 NC9 0 87 98.3 99.6 100 20 NC10 0 68.7 93 98.5 99.9 21 NC11 0 0 0 0 0 22 11 0 0 0 0 0 23 12 0 0 0 0 0 24 13 0 0 0 1 0 0 25 OVERALL 0 25.8 40.9 1 46.6 50." Page 34 W:\1074.08\P8 tables-WEMSHORWEST-2-P8 %rem-pc (2) City of Shorewood Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan Gideon Bay, North-Central, and Lake Minnetonka Watersheds-P8 Results PERCENT REMOVAL EFFICIENCY OF TREATMENT DEVICE FOR EACH WATER QUALITY COMPONENT 69 OW4 E ff 1 GBI 83.9 48.7 41 41 74.1 41 74.1 65.7 67.8 2 GB2 74.7 36.3 29.7 29.7 63.3 29.7 63.3 55 56.6 3 G133 88.7 53.8 45.3 45.3 78.3 45.3 78.3 73.6 75.4 4 GI34 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 GB5 46.1 12.8 10.7 10.7 40.7 10.7 40.7 25.5 26.2 6 G136 60.7 27.4 22.9 22.9 52.4 22.9 52.4 36.6 38.4 7 GB7 80.9 44.5 36.9 36.9 69.6 36.9 69.6 61.9 64.1 8 GB8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 G139 95.1 61 51.4 51.4 84 51.4 84 89.5 89.9 10 GB10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 NCI 54 18.3 15.4 15.4 47.6 15.4 47.6 30.6 31.6 12 NC2 77.1 41.8 34.7 34.7 66.1 34.7 66.1 56.3 58.6 13 NC3 37.7 8.9 6.9 6.9 28.5 6.9 28.5 18.3 19.2 14 NC4 22.3 3.5 2.7 2.7 17 2.7 17 9.2 9.6 15 NC5 67.1 32.1 27 27 59.3 27 59.3 47.9 49.2 16 NC6 90.2 55.5 46.7 46.7 79.7 46.7 79.7 77.3 78.8 17 NC7 96.8 56.7 46.3 46.3 82.1 46.3 821 91.9 92.2 18 NC8 96.9 62.9 53 53 85.6 53 85.6 92.3 92.6 19 NC9 96.9 61.9 51.9 51.9 85.1 51.9 85.1 91.7 92.2 20 NC10 91.7 54.4 45.1 45.1 79.5 45.1 79.5 81.4 82.5 21 NC1 1 0 0 0 0 0 b 0 0 0 22 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 b 0 23 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 13 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 25 OVERALL 1 42.8 25 21 21 37.8 21 1 37.8 35.6 1 36.2 Page 35 WA1074.08P8 tables-WEMSHORWEST-2-P8 %rem-wqc (3) City of Shorewood Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan Gideon Bay, North - Central, and Lake Minnetonka Watersheds -P8 Results CONCENTRATION (PPM) PRESENT IN THE INFLOW OF EACH TREATMENT DEVICE FOR EACH PARTICLE CLASS D �ry 0.2 �i �� 1 � z ,3 GB 1 {Pi F W4�._ Sx �E^ 'Mx�.^�4 1 il t .J�3 nY 16.849 w� 'p Q CY }'.'fQ. "3 � 9v 133.699 ` ... Y 4 1 5'ivR -, $ 2 GB 2 1 12.358 11.719 23.149 3 GB 3 1 16.849 16.849 16.849 33.698 4 GB 4 0.994 11.065 6.19 3.966 6.062 5 GB 5 1 16.849 16.849 16.849 33.699 6 GB 6 1 16.685 15.946 14.349 23.335 7 GB 7 1 16.383 14.563 12.838 24.143 8 GB 8 1 16.849 16.849 16.849 33.699 9 GB 9 1 16.849 16.849 16.849 33.698 10 GB 10 1 16.849 16.849 16.849 33.698 11 NC 1 1 16.547 16.547 16.547 33.095 12 NC 2 1 16.318 15.221 13.175 22.391 13 NC 3 1 12.942 6.961 5.04 9.288 14 NC 4 1 13.283 8.136 5.757 8.227 15 NC 5 1 16.849 16.849 16.849 33.699 16 NC 6 1 16.849 16.849 16.849 33.698 17 NC 7 1 13.986 12.257 12.013 23.918 18 NC 8 1 16.849 16.849 16.849 33.698 19 NC 9 0.848 13.796 13.613 13.552 27.04 20 NC 10 0.624 9.379 8.969 8.871 17.671 21 NC 11 1 15.004 12.348 10.742 17.966 22 11 1 16.849 16.849 16.849 33.699 23 12 1 16.849 16.849 1 16.849 33.699 24 13 1 1 16.849 16.849 1 16.849 33.699 25 OVERALL 1 1 16.823 16.823 1 16.823 1 33.646 Page 36 WA1074.081P8 tables- WESWSHORWEST -2 -N INFL -pc (4) City of Shorewood Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan Gideon Bay, North-Central, and Lake Minnetonka Watersheds-P8 Results CONCENTRATION (PPM) PRESENT IN THE INFLOW OF EACH TREATMENT DEVICE FOR EACH WATER QUALITY COMPONENT � & I t ... t 7` c GB 1 A IF Bosom 84.246 8, 0.473 'jm W 2.173 0.023 �0 t"" 0.063 zi 5 M 0.125 M 2.146 98.062 14.459 2 GB 2 62.048 0.4 1.894 0.02 0.048 0,109 1.646 77.847 11.383 3 G13 3 84.246 0.473 2.173 0.023 0.063 0.125 2.146 98.062 14.459 4 GB 27.284 0.29 1.464 0,015 0.025 0.084 0.862 45.454 6.511 5 GB 5 84.246 0.473 2.173 0.023 0.063 0.125 2.146 98.062 14.459 6 G86 70,315 0.451 2.088 0.022 0,054 0.12 1.832 88.973 13.084 7 GB 7 67.927 0.431 2.011 0.021 0.052 0.115 1.778 86.058 12.615 8 GB 8 84.246 0.473 2.173 0.023 1 0.063 0.125 2.146 98.062 14,459 9 GB 9 84.246 0.473 2.173 0.023 0.063 0.125 2.146 98.062 1 14.459 10 GB 10 84.246 0.473 2.173 0.023 0,063 0.125 2.146 98.062 14.459 11 NC 1 82.737 0.467 2.151 0.023 0.062 0.123 2.112 96.333 14.204 12 NC 2 67.106 0.437 2.033 0.021 0.052 0.117 1.76 85.844 12.609 13 NC 3 34.231 0.314 1.559 0.016 0.03 0.089 1.02 54.096 7.744 14 NC 4 35.403 0.328 1.612 0.017 0.031 0.092 1.046 56.254 8.092 15 NC 5 84.246 0.473 2.173 0.023 0.063 0.125 2.146 98.062 14.459 16 NC 6 84.246 0.473 2.173 0.023 0.063 0.125 2.146 98.062 14.459 17 NC 7 62173 0.396 1.878 0.02 0.048 0.108 1.649 76.041 11.146 18 NC 8 84.246 0.473 2.173 0.023 0.063 0.125 2.146 98.062 14.459 19 NC 9 68 0.389 1.797 0.019 0.051 0.103 1.742 79.649 11.737 20 NC 10 44.89 0.268 1.252 0.013 0.034 0.072 1.166 53.261 7.837 21 NC 11 56.06 0.395 1.874 0.02 0.044 0.107 1.511 74.725 1 10.911 22 11 84.246 0.473 2,173 0.023 0.063 0.125 2.146 98.062 14.459 23 12 84.246 0.473 2.173 0.023 0.063 1 0.125 2.146 98.062 14.459 24 13 84.246 1 0.473 2.173 0.023 0.063 0.125 2.146 98.062 14.459 25 OVERALL 84.115 1 0.472 2.171_ 0.023 0.063 0.124 2.143 97.911 14.4 Page 37 WA1074.08P8 tables-WEMSHORWEST-2-P8 INFLOW-wqc (5) City of Shorewood Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan Gideon Bay, North - Central, and Lake Minnetonka Watersheds -1 Results CONCENTRATION (PPM) PRESENT IN THE OUTFLOW OF EACH TREATMENT DEVICE FOR EACH PARTICLE CLASS Jy�e 1 k Jt§' G61 7 �� NSj+ { f 1 } C6 ...r'31�'• 10.392 t k`„ }` 2.545 '�°�t l 0.508 1 a .9 - r` 0.097 , 2 G132 0.992 9.978 4.143 1.329 0.257 3 GB3 1 8.251 1.532 0.324 0.061 4 G64 0.994 11.066 6.19 3.966 6.062 5 GB5 1.001 16.546 14.447 9.913 4.589 6 G66 1 15.232 8.918 2.933 0.546 7 GB7 1 10.225 2.282 0.38 0.064 8 G138 1 16.849 16.849 16.849 33.698 9 G89 0.406 2.383 0.966 0.424 0.087 10 GB10 1 16.849 16.849 1 16.849 33.698 11 NCI 1 16.08 12.874 6.894 2.215 12 NC2 1 11.47 3.236 0.591 0.092 13 NC3 1 12.264 5.626 2.557 0.875 14 NC4 1 13.177 7.685 4.489 2.159 15 NC5 0.998 12.973 8.255 4.875 1.593 16 NC6 0.999 6.996 1 1.045 0.205 0.041 17 NC7 0.262 1.218 0.395 0.139 0.024 18 NC8 0.232 1.411 0.484 0.176 0.031 19 NC9 0.184 1.116 0.233 0.052 0.007 20 NC10 0.419 2.769 0.626 0.133 0.02 21 NC11 1 15.004 12.348 10.742 17.966 22 11 1 16.849 16.849 16.849 33.698 23 12 1 16.849 16.849 16.849 33.698 24 13 1 16.86 16.86 16.86 33.721 25 OVERALL 0.892 12.583 10.31 9.359 17.357 Page 38 W.\1074.081P8 tables- WEMSHORWEST -2 -P8 OUTFL -pc (6) City of Shorewood Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan Gideon Bay, North-Central, and Lake Minnetonka Watersheds-P8 Results CONCENTRATION (PPM) PRESENT IN THE OUTFLOW OF EACH TREATMENT DEVICE FOR EACH WATER QUALITY COMPONENT Page 39 WA1074.08P8 tables-VVEST2SHORWEST-2-P8 outflow -wqc (7) US, V "R � M W a 0 1 GBI 13.542 0.243 1.282 0.013 0.016 0.074 0.555 33.675 4.662 2 GB2 15.708 0.254 1.323 0.014 0.018 0.076 0.601 35.027 4.936 3 GB3 10.169 0.222 1.203 1 0.013 0.014 0.069 1 0.479 26.415 3.637 4 G84 27.285 0.29 1.464 0.015 0.025 0.084 0.862 45.455 6.511 5 G135 45.495 0,413 1.943 0.02 0.037 0.111 1.274 73.185 10.693 6 G136 27.629 0.327 1.61 0.017 0.026 0.092 0.872 56.415 8.062 7 GB7 12.951 0.239 1.269 0.013 0.016 0.073 0.541 32.804 4.53 8 GB8 84.245 0.473 2.173 0.023 0.063 0.125 2.145 1 98.061 14.458 9 GB9 3.86 0.088 0.48 1 0.005 0.006 0.028 0.188 8.678 1.225 10 G1310 84.245 0.473 2.173 0.023 0.063 0.125 2.145 98.061 14,458 11 NCI 38.063 0.382 1.82 0.019 0.032 0.104 1.106 66.834 9.713 12 NC2 15.389 0.254 1.327 0.014 0.018 0.076 0.596 37.532 5.215 13 NC3 21.322 0.286 1.45 0.015 0.021 0.083 0.73 44.219 6.259 14 NC4 27.51 0,317 1.568 0.016 0.026 0.09 0.869 51.113 7.317 15 NC5 27.696 0.321 1.585 1 0.017 0.026 0.091 0.873 51.131 7.348 16 NC6 8.287 0.21 1.157 0.012 0.013 0.066 0.436 22.281 3.058 17 NC7 1.776 0.053 0.293 0.003 0.003 0.017 0.105 4.343 0.609 18 NC8 2.101 0.05 0.273 0.003 0.003 0.016 0.105 4.962 0.696 19 NC9 1.409 0.038 0 0.002 0.002 0.012 0.078 3.684 0.509 20 NC10 3.548 0.089 0.487 0.005 0.005 0.028 0.185 9.143 1.266 21 NC1 1 56.059 0.395 1.874 0.02 0.044 0.107 1.511 74.724 10.911 22 11 84.245 0.473 2.173 0.023 0.063 0.125 2.145 98.061 14.458 23 12 84.245 0.473 2.173 0.023 0.063 0.125 1 2.145 98.06 14.458 24 1 13 84.301 0.473 2.174 0.023 0.063 0.125 2.147 98.125 14.468 25 1 OVERALL 49.608 0.342 1.63 0.017 0.039 0.093 f 1.339 64.243 1 9.383 Page 39 WA1074.08P8 tables-VVEST2SHORWEST-2-P8 outflow -wqc (7)