Loading...
03-10-14 CC WS AgendaCITY OF SHOREWOOD CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION MONDAY, MARCH 10, 2014 AGENDA 1. CONVENE CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION A. Roll Call B. Review Agenda 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD COUNCIL CHAMBERS 6:1_5 P.M. Mavor Zerbv Hotvet Siakel Sundberg Woodruff 2. SOUTHSHORE CENTER ADVISORY COMMITTEE PROPOSAL 3. ADJOURN ATTACHMENTS Administrator's memo CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 Country Club Road • Shorewood, Minnesota 55331 • 952- 960 -7900 Fax: 952- 474 -0128 • NN -NN -Na- .ci.shoreNN- ood.mn.us • cit-,halla?ci.shoreNN- ood.mn.us Date: February 28, 2014 To: Shorewood City Council Members From: Bill loynes, City Administrator CC: Tim Keane, Bruce Delong, Twila Grout, Julie Moore, lean Panchyshyn, Joe Pazandak Re: Southshore Center On March 10, 2014, a Council work session is scheduled to discuss the Southshore Center Advisory Committee's proposal for a three -year pilot project, provided as Attachment 1. In addition, the Council has asked Attorney Keane to provide a legal interpretation of Shorewood's options should the Advisory Committee's proposal not go forward. Mr. Keane's comments are provided as Attachment 2. Council and the Advisory Committee have received the Vantage Program's research and recommendations. The Vantage information has been incorporated into the Committee's proposal. Staff has discussed the Advisory Committee's proposal as currently drafted, and felt an obligation to advise Council on some areas that need further clarification if the City were to go forward in cooperation with the other four cities. The proposal is a good- intentioned effort, prepared in a short period of time, to map a strategy for future operations where the Center is fiscally viable and remains community oriented. City staff has had the obligation of running the Center for the last year. Our experience and the time committed to managing the Center creates concerns about some of the limits of the information provided. While not exhaustive, the following is a list of major concerns. The most conservative operation projections provided in the Advisory Committee proposal are used in the following comments. This scenario is closest to present experience and most in line with Minnetonka Community Education (MCE) start up estimates. Staffing and Hours: Hours of operation as described in the proposal consist of 45 weeks of programming with 48 hours a week, (four, 12 hour days) under the control of MCE. Another three, 12 hour days, would be available for rental and miscellaneous programming to be arranged, managed, and staffed by the City. Normal "business hours" of the Center would be 9:OOAM to 4:OOPM, seven days a week (See graph, Exhibit A). Past experience indicates that rentals could be booked all 52 weeks in a year. Southshore Center Febniary 28, 2014 Page 2 of 4 Calculations of Staff Coverage: MCE hours for programming: 45 weeks @ 48 hrs per week = 2,160 hours Rental hours available: 52 weeks @ 27 hrs per week = 1,404 hours Total hrs. 3,564 Site Manager hours: 48 weeks @ 20 hrs per week = 960 hours Desk Assistant hours: various = 1,858 hours Total hrs. 2,818 Budgeted hours cover about 80% of the time the Center could be scheduled. It also assumes a closing time of 9:OOPM at night with no overlapping coverage for major events, i.e. only one person in attendance at any given time. It is not unusual for events on weekends to last beyond the 9:OOPM hour. Those 746 (at a minimum) hours are not taken into account. Shorewood Responsibilities as Fiduciary Agent: • Handle supervisory functions for Center staff, i.e. hiring, performance issues, personnel records • Payroll • Payables and receivables • Audit • Oversee upgrade construction • Set room rental fees • Monthly report to executive committee and occasional attendance • Promotional newsletter /flyers (unless this would be handled by MCE) For the above responsibilities Shorewood would receive $2,500. This seems low. Programming Control: It is understandable that MCE would want total control of programming for the usual four days of their operations. Attachment 3 lists clients that currently use the Center on an ongoing basis. This group may have to be moved or denied use during the M -Th block that MCE requires. This also may result in a loss of revenue. The yearly dates in parentheses indicate how long these existing clients have been using the Center. Senior Programming and Rental Fee: The proposal assumes a continued use by the Southshore Senior Partners (SSSP) and the $600 per month rental fee. During the Advisory Committee's discussions it was not clear if the SSSP were able or willing to commit to this level of funding. The SSSP are not likely to continue paying $600 without consistently available space during the day on Monday through Thursday. It is not clear in the proposal what priority SSSP activities will have during the time to be programmed by MCE. Southshore Center Febniary 28, 2014 Page 3 of 4 Staffing Expertise: The proposal calls for two levels of paid staff: 1) the Site Manager at $15.00 per hour, and, 2) Desk Assistants at $8.00 per hour. Currently, Twila Grout and Julie Moore manage operations. The hours they provide are in excess of the budgeted proposal and at a much higher monetary figure which is consistent with other successful centers as identified by the Vantage study. Staff has also had difficulty attracting reliable part -time help at a rate less than $10 per hour. The proposal, and all that we have heard, suggests that MCE will not be involved in managing any of the daily operations of the Center. They will advertise their programs in the MCE quarterly brochure. Much of the current marketing involves meeting on -site with prospective renters and negotiating staffing and logistics. Sometimes this takes three or four meetings, often conducted outside of normal business hours. It is also assumed that the variety and intensity of Center use will increase. Consideration should be given to the assumption in the proposal that the Center will increase the quantity and quality of its usage with part -time management and fewer staff hours than currently exists. One Time Upgrades: The list of repair and upgrade items is very comprehensive and appropriate. Some of the improvements will have additional financial implications. As an example, putting carpeting in the foyer will require substantially more cleaning funds. New signage will require changes at the Center, several street signs and the digital sign. Before cities commit, this list of items needs to be discussed and verified by staff. This list of equipment does not include any of the commercial kitchen items or dining room chairs which are also in need of replacement. Basic Underlying Assumption: The Cove Proposal lists as the first key take away from the Vantage report that six of the surveyed community centers break even or better. The unstated assumption in the proposal is that it is possible for The Cove to do the same. Later in the Vantage Report, common elements of success are listed for those centers that do break even or better. Those common elements include: Meeting Rooms Workout Facilities Swimming Pools Child Care Facilities Ice Rinks Concessions At the present time, the Center provides only one of these elements — meeting rooms. It seems overly optimistic to think that a break even scenario is possible given current building resources. There will likely be an ongoing deficit during the three years of this pilot program and some agreement to share that cost should be agreed upon by the participating organizations. Southshore Center Febniary 28, 2014 Page 4 of 4 Governing Structure: The governing body, with appointed members from each council, does not have authority to implement the improvements if any expenditure exceeds budget. The requirement to get approval from all cities for improvements that cost more than the estimates included in this proposal will likely be problematic and will become an additional point to halt or delay any improvements to the Center. Conclusion: It is not the intent of staff to suggest this proposal will not work or to discourage Shorewood's involvement. Staff does, however, take the responsibility to advise Council on actions that may place an increased burden on the City's staff and financial resources. Over the years, the Southshore Center has experienced very optimistic intentions with a lesser amount of financial realism. It is not known if the Center can be self sustaining, and if not, it should be acknowledged and planned for by the participating communities. 0 21 MlVffa=aak�nA rS 3-YEAR PIL01T PROJECT' PROPOSAk FEBRUARY 15, 2014 Ilreparcci by Tolika Bay Councilnicnibcr Elli Ansari and Greenwood Mayor Deb Kind ATTACHMENT 1 0"I", M1,117, LIM,, XIIII i -nic Southshore Center (SSQ is located at 5735 Covintry Club Road,, Shorewood, N. The Facility was built in 1996 with f1inding fron'i the foil owi n g: '17be Friends of the Southshore Center operated the center with funcb from grants and their tnunbership, until 2008 when grant nioney dried Lip. Froni 2009 to prescrit, the city of Shorewood has niatiagcd the SSC. 'nicy hired a director to increase rctitals of the facility and to create programs -ning for all agcs. At the sarne, thane, the "Friends" becanie the Southshore Senior Partners (Sssp) and retired space at the SS(', foi- approximately $600 per inonth for their senior prograins. Ina 2012, Shorewood contributed $60,000 to subsidize SSC operations. In August 2013, Shorewood officials initiated discussions with the 5 owner cities to detcrininc the fUtUrc operations of thc SS( ". A SSC Advisory Committee was fortned and ctigaged studejus froin VAWAGE Winneronka High School' Advanced Professional Studies prograni) s to help with the project. Froni Noveniber 2013 to January, 2014, the VAN]"INCA", tearn worked wvirh SSC Advisouy Subcoininittee mernbers; to conduct research and, inake roxoniniendations that will restore the financial viability of the SSC so it can conrinue its iiiission of providing services and facilities to the residents and businesses of the 5 cities. Key learnings from the VANTAGE team's research: I . nere are 6 conimunity centers in the metro area that Operate at or near break- even,, so it is possible for the SSC to Operate at kreak-even as well, 2. The facility's awareness needs to be iniproved. 43% of survey respond enus never heard of the SS C, and Of the 571YO who have heard of the SSC, niost believe that it is a "seilior" ce.11ter orily. 3. '16 operate at break-even statUS, the facility needs to ... • I lave professional prograriiniing, scheduling, ajid aiarkcri ag to iiiaxiftliU Use Of the space. Appeal to all ages and potential renters. 4. 'Ib appeal to all ages and potential renters ... The appearance of the buil(fing needs to be upgraded to have a "woo feeling. The building technology needs tea be upgraded, The building needs new "branding," Key desires from the city of Shorewood and the SSSP: 1. WOUld like soineone on site during regular business hours, prograkiiniing, and rentals. 2. Would like the SSSP to be able to) C011thMe to rent space at, the facility. The 3-year pilot project proposal on the following pages addresses the above "key learnings" and key desires"' with the goal to set a course that will make the center financially viable for the future. 3-YEAR PIL01' PROJEC I PROPOSM 1 2 % of Ownership Deephaven I RMI M MOM Shorewood Friends of the Southshore Center (Seniors) '17be Friends of the Southshore Center operated the center with funcb from grants and their tnunbership, until 2008 when grant nioney dried Lip. Froni 2009 to prescrit, the city of Shorewood has niatiagcd the SSC. 'nicy hired a director to increase rctitals of the facility and to create programs -ning for all agcs. At the sarne, thane, the "Friends" becanie the Southshore Senior Partners (Sssp) and retired space at the SS(', foi- approximately $600 per inonth for their senior prograins. Ina 2012, Shorewood contributed $60,000 to subsidize SSC operations. In August 2013, Shorewood officials initiated discussions with the 5 owner cities to detcrininc the fUtUrc operations of thc SS( ". A SSC Advisory Committee was fortned and ctigaged studejus froin VAWAGE Winneronka High School' Advanced Professional Studies prograni) s to help with the project. Froni Noveniber 2013 to January, 2014, the VAN]"INCA", tearn worked wvirh SSC Advisouy Subcoininittee mernbers; to conduct research and, inake roxoniniendations that will restore the financial viability of the SSC so it can conrinue its iiiission of providing services and facilities to the residents and businesses of the 5 cities. Key learnings from the VANTAGE team's research: I . nere are 6 conimunity centers in the metro area that Operate at or near break- even,, so it is possible for the SSC to Operate at kreak-even as well, 2. The facility's awareness needs to be iniproved. 43% of survey respond enus never heard of the SS C, and Of the 571YO who have heard of the SSC, niost believe that it is a "seilior" ce.11ter orily. 3. '16 operate at break-even statUS, the facility needs to ... • I lave professional prograriiniing, scheduling, ajid aiarkcri ag to iiiaxiftliU Use Of the space. Appeal to all ages and potential renters. 4. 'Ib appeal to all ages and potential renters ... The appearance of the buil(fing needs to be upgraded to have a "woo feeling. The building technology needs tea be upgraded, The building needs new "branding," Key desires from the city of Shorewood and the SSSP: 1. WOUld like soineone on site during regular business hours, prograkiiniing, and rentals. 2. Would like the SSSP to be able to) C011thMe to rent space at, the facility. The 3-year pilot project proposal on the following pages addresses the above "key learnings" and key desires"' with the goal to set a course that will make the center financially viable for the future. 3-YEAR PIL01' PROJEC I PROPOSM 1 2 3-YE'IAR PILOT'PROJECT PRO�PO�SAL L Since the "Southshore Center" tizinic evokes ",senior center," it is important to re-brand the building with as new narne and to line to appeal to all ages and potential renters. 717he proposal is to change the building's narile to something like The Cove — Learn, Plity, Celebwte (see design idea on the cover of this docurilent). Jbc Cove name is inspired by the building's cozy / biddeii location near Lake Minnetonka. 3. Update the website and building with the new brand, 4. Make building upgrades to create a "wow" first irripression chat appeals to all ages (see list oil pages 4-5). The list includes costs for "now" and costs for potential "fUtIll-C" Upgrades. 'nie "now" costs include changes that would create the biggcst impact for the least arTIOLInt of money ... (a) A dramatic entrance with a feature wall, accent lighting, carpct, etc. (b) 'Ib house the "senior" items and to make better USC Of SpaCC, the large coat room Would be, re-purposed into ­ffic Corner" gift shop / display area.— a centralized place to showcase bakery sale items, greeting cards, newsletters, books, etc. (c) Coats, wOUld be hung on all attractive new coat hooksystcrri in the hallway. (d) Also, to tic-in with the lake thenae, the rooms Would be named after L.ake Minnetonka bays — Echo Bay Room (dining room), Gideon Ilay Roont (activity room), Carson Bay Roon'i (conference room) — and black zind white prints of Lake N,hnneronka iniages would be displayed on the walls, Ideas for payitig for the "now" costs are on page 6. 3, A Cove Executive Board would oversee the upgrades (see page 6). 4. For simplicity, the proposal is for Shorewood ro continue to manage operations, set, roorn rental races, etc. Based oil the projections on pages 7-10 spaeidsbeers, the operations are likely to break even (conservative estimate) or COUld Ile profitable (optimistic estimate). -flie spreadsheets for operations assurne the following: A. Minnetonka C0111111LInity Education (MC E) will provide professional progrartirning for all ages. Marketing will be done through the NICE catalog that is mailed to all school district homes. The catalog will include an ad for renting The Cove, MC E alsro will be in charge of scheduling all programs and rentals, so space information is in one place. Rentals will be for the room and table set-tip only. 11c renter will need too arrangc for linens, catering,, liquor insurance, etc. Program revenue will be split 60% to the instructor / prograrn director, 30% to MC E, 10% to "flee Cove. Rental revenue from weddings, chw reunions, etc. will be split 30% to MCI and 709% to The Cove. B. The Cove may ]lost ftindraising events during times when the facility is not being used for NICE programming or rentals. C, 17he Cove's regular business hours would be 9aili to 4pm, M-F -nie reception desk would be "niatined" during regular business hours and arlytitne The Cove his progratnining, or rentals after hours. D. A Site Manager / Receptionist (paid, by The Cove) would work 4 hours per day, WE Responsibilities include- - (_',recting people who enter the building, answering the phone, responding to emaits. — Maintaining the Faccbook page, websire, electronic nionurtient sign,'FV loop. — Recruitino, training, zinc] SC11CCILdina Assistant Receptionists to cover the other I'CgUlar bUSinCSS hOUI'S and 0 Z-1 after -IIOLI I-S prop grarrinii ng / rentals as needed. — Showing facilities to potential renters (schedUling will be done through MCE). — Coordinating 'ffic Cove fundraising events such as Oktoberfcstand Open Mike Nights, — Mariagin'g the Custodian. — Ille Site Manager will have access to the schedule and / or coordinate with MC E to determine scheduling for the reception desk and Custodian. ll. The Custodian (paid, by The Cove) will report to and be scheduled by the Site Manager. The Custodian will be responsible for cleaning / general maintenance Of bUilding and for table / chair ser-ups as needed, 5. 'Fo honor the historic contributions of the "Friends" and S,S,SP, Jbc Cove may discount rentals to Elie SSSR and may split proceeds from "'T"he Corner" gift shop / display area with the SSSP However, to ensurc, that Ihe Cove's re-branding efforts are successful, the SSSP will need to keep a clear and separate identity for their organization and printed materials. The proposal is to commit to the above pilot project for 3 years. IIf all goes well, The Cove / MCE partnership may be continued in the future. 3-YEAR PIL01' PROJEC I PROPOSM 1 3 ,� �" • A A Ai "" � W ", AA 0 m Mall 0 0 '1=0 - 1=19 MOO mlm�ll E E "r AA "r:AA AAA w MOO 46 4 E w ii P .�? r AJi��w �a � _� to a� W ", AA 0 m Mall 0 0 '1=0 - 1=19 MOO mlm�ll 1_m� AEE k AAAI r A ll� 'Y Al "r� Ar "r AA "r:AA AAA A MOO :7 �> A' r AJi��w � 1_m� AEE k AAAI r A ll� 'Y Al "r� Ar ", A! Immmm A MOO 1 EA A ME A ,AA W "Y A. if AA 1 m 'Y AA `Y AAAI� 'r Ai AAI 3M 93 1A AA,r "AAA M 11 E 10 E V r MEN mm »�i 46 A) M'P . �, At 4) 0 M 11 MO NEW., mmm M�M�M M » � / Mmrnwl M®I Notc. Shorewood also is considering parking lot improvenients. Sce the concepts provided by Shorewood in the FYI section of this documcnt. 3-YEAR PILOT PROJEC I PROPOSM 1 5 MEN mm »�i mm Mini M'P . �, At m m, MOO IN= MO NEW., mmm M�M�M M » � / Mmrnwl M®I Notc. Shorewood also is considering parking lot improvenients. Sce the concepts provided by Shorewood in the FYI section of this documcnt. 3-YEAR PILOT PROJEC I PROPOSM 1 5 30 I . Split even[), by the Owner cities (,see spreadshcet below). 2. Split by percentage Of bUilding ownership (see spreadsheet below). 3, Split by blending 1-2 above (see spreadsheet below) . 4. Seek in-kind partnerships (e.g. Cambria) and / or donations from the COMMUllity tea offset costs. 5. Other e?'?' Note- A separate bUt related topic that needs to be discussed by the owner 'cities is limo, to pay for otlier capital expenses such as as new roof. See the Capital Irnprovernent plan provided by Shorewood in the FYI section of this document. �M;MLDING OWNERSHIP % of Buildinv, Ownershi-& Deephaven $10,078 22,45% Excelsior $6,554 14,60% Greenwood $1,773 3,95% Shorewood $22,445 50,00% Tonka Bay $4,040 9.00% ITOTAL $44,891 100.00%1 SPLIT EVENLY $4,489 $15,712 % Split Evenly Deephaven $8,978 20,00% Excelsior $8,978 20.00% Greenwood $8,978 20,00% Shorewood $8,978 20,00% -Tonka Bay $8,978 20.00% TOTAL 1 $44,891 100.000// 01 :114 M Q ADIM EMMA 110 1 UtIOLTRIAZ&O IAFM:Jgk I EUT All Deephaven 112 Ownership $5,039 112 Split Evenly $4,489 "Total $9,528 Blended % 21.23% Excelsior $3,277 $4,489 $7,766 17,30% Greenwood $887 $4,489 $5,376 11.98% Shorewood $11,223 $4,489 $15,712 35.00% Tonka Bay $2,020 $4,489 $6,,509 14.50% TOTAL $22,445 $22,,445 $44,891 100.00% `flic proposal is to establisli 'Fhe Cove ExeCUtive Board to oversee the irnprovenictits. ne fonowing outlines tbe proCedUresand ClUtiCS of the board - 1. One elected official appointed by eacli owner city. 'Me board chair is elected by the board, 2. All city councils rnust approVC CXPCIlditUres beyond the scope Outlined in the apj.-)rovcd bUdget. 3. 'flic board will review montbly payables reports and YTD staterncrits, provided by the fiduciary contractor via ernail. 4. The board may call special nicetings as needed, 5. 'flie board exists for the duration of improvcment project only. 3-YEAR PIL01' PROJEC I PROPOSM 1 6 REVENUE m Revenue 511211 11 1 ,1, REVENUE 'M Average class fee per person per hour $10 Times average number of members eer class X 10 Average income eer room eer hour F1 0-0 A Potential programing hours per day (9arn to 9 12 Times 3 rooms X 3 Times days per week no programs on Fridays or weekends) X 4 Times number of weeks per year X 45 Equals total number of potential programming hours per y ear 6,480 Minus 65% of ero2ram hours unscheduled or cancelled classes - 4,212 Total number of erooram hours eer year 7726-8- 6 Times average income per room eer hour (A) X 1100 A Equals total erograrn revenue eer year $226,800 60% to instructors $136,080 30% to MCE $68,040 10% to The Cove Annual Programming Revenue) $22,680 $22,680 Weddings and Sgecial Event Rental Revenue $25,000 SSSP Space Rental ($,6O�0: per month) $7,200 30% to MCE $9,660 70% to The Cove (Annual Rental Income) $22.540 $22.540 ITotal Revenuea4 22 EXPENSES (paid by The Cove) Labor Regular business hours eer year 1,750 H (7 hours per day, 5 days a week, 52 weeks per year, minus 10 holidays) Site Manager / Receptionist hours per year �4 hours per day, 5 days a week, 48 weeks eer year) 960 1 Times hourly rate X $15 Site Manager / Receetionist cost eer year $ 1 T;MT i Reception Desk Assistants hours eer year H - 1 790 Additional program hours j4 ern to 9 M-F) + 518 B-H Additional soecial event hours (Fridav late niaht and weekend rentals) + 550 Times hourly rate X Reception Desk Assistants cost ner vear Custodian hours per year 300 Cost 2 Workers Come $300 Total Labor $41,491 $41,491 3-YEAk' PIL(,.)]' PROJEC I PROPOSM 1 7 Custodian Supplies (light bulbs, cleaning sue2lies, etc.) $1,500 Office Expenses (rental price sheets, envetooes, stamps, etc.) $1.000 MU t Uatalog I-rograrn Listings IOU MC E Catalog Ad for The Cove Rentals $0 Web Hosting $450 Fiduciary Contractor $21500 Payroll Receivables Payables Year-to-Date Reports Vanr-Pnri Ponnrf Property Taxes (none - government buildin2) $0 Building Insurance $1,000 Utilities Internet - MR (Shorewood) $0 Waste Removal $2,150 Water ?? Snowplowing & Landscape Contractor $1,000 Snow Plowin2 Mowing / Landscape Maintenance Pest Control ITotal ExEenses $63,8911 INET PROFIT (Revenue minus Expenses) $3291 3-YEAR PILOT PROJEC I PROPOSM 1 8 RN =,,, REVENUE Program Revenue Avera2e class fee 2er person 2er hour $10 Times average number of members 2er class X 10 Average income eer room per hour $100 A Potential programing hours per day (gam to 9 ) 12 Times 3 rooms X 3 Times days per week no programs on Fridays or weekends) X 4 Times number of weeks eer year X 45 Equals total number of potential ero2ramming hours eer year 6,480 Minus 30% of program hours unscheduled or cancelled classes — 1,944 Total number of erogram hours eer year 4,536 B Times average income 2er room per hour A X 100 A Equals total program revenue per year 1 60% to instructors $272,160 30% to NICE $136,080 10% to The Cove Annual Programming Revenue) $45,360 $45,360 Weddings and Special Event Rental Revenue $25,000 SSSP Space Rental ($1000 per month) $12,000 VAN I AUL b pace Donations to The 30% to MCE $11,100 70% to The Cove (Annual Rental Income) $25.900 $25.900 ITotal Revenue $90 260 EXPENSES (paid by The Cove) Labor Re2ular business hours per year 1,750 H (7 hours per day, 5 days a week, 52 weeks per year, minus 10 holidays) Site Manager / Receptionist hours per year �4 hours per day, 5 days a week, 48 weeks per year 960 1 Times hourly rate X $15 anaaer / Receotionist cost Reception Desk Assistants hours per year (H — 11 790 Additional program hours 4 to 9 M-F) + 2,786 B-H Additional seecial event hours (Friday late night and weekend rentals) + 550 Times hourly rate X 8 Receotion Desk Assistants cost r)er vear 33.008 K Custodian hours Times EEO L Total Payroll (J + K + L 156,408 FICA (6.2%) -P—,47 Medicare Contribution (1.45%) $818 3-YEAR PIL01' PROJEC I PROPOSM 1 9 Custodian Su lies (light bulbs, cleaning supplies, etc.) $1,500 Office Expenses rentat erice sheets, envelopes, stamps, etc.) $1 ZOOO Sales & Marketing MCE Catalo2 Pr rare Listin2s $0 MCE Catalog Ad for The Cove Rentals $0 Web Hostin2 $450 Fiduciary Contractor $4.500 Receivables Pa abler Year-to-Date Ike arts Year-End Re art Audit ProRerty Taxes (none - government building) $0 Building Insurance $14000 Utilities Cable TV - None $0 Phone $1,500 Electric $9,300 Gas Internet - WiFi Waste Removal $2,150 Water ?? Snowgiowing & Landscage Contractor $2,000 Snow Plowing Mowina / Landscaoe Maintenance JTotal Expenses $86,4231 JAPT PONT (Revenue minus Expenses) $3,8371 ,I'll 1111D�; 111"J1* We (Elli Ansari and Deli Kind) have nIet with Tim Litfin from MCE, and tweaks were nIade to this proposal based Orl his input. However, the WIT" board would need to approve the plan before "committing" to anything. After OUr prcscm-atio n to the SSC Advisory Com III i ttee, the consensus of the grOUP Was to present the concepr to the owner city COU1161S to grange their interest iti pursuing the project, before anything is presented to the M(T board. Also, it ShOUld be noted chat the rcverIUC spreadsheets include income from mating to Minnetonka High Scl'iools VANTAGE program. It is our understanding that VANTAGE is looking for more rental space, but we have not met with VANTAGE officials yet. 'T'heref'ore, the next steps are I. Present the proposal to the owner city councils to gauge their interest in pursuing the project. 2. Determine the forMUla For "now" costs. 3. Discuss concept with VANTAGE officials. 4. Presem the proposal to Tim Litfin and the MCE Board.. 5. -flie owner city ca m'icils consider approval of the 3-Year Pilot Project. 3-YEAR PILOT PROJEC I PROPOSM � 10 1"I'll", 1"I'll", Capital Improvement Program 0 mflMorevimmid iivtesot-,,.� 2014 thl-1, 2018 ................................................. . ................. . ..... . .......... .... Project N 1"'F- 1.1. -01 ProjectNanic South SlloreCOMMUnityCentef- ... .. ...... . ........ 1-11.11------ . .. ............ . . ........ .... . .......... .... . . ... . ........................................... ....... ...... Department 490 - Southshore Center contact Type Improvement Useful Life Category Public FacilifiestBuildings Priority n1a TWO Project Cost: $88,500 Description The council! directed funds be included to cover possible capital snaintenmice or improvernmit costs to the South Shore Community Center. 2016 - Water I leater $2,500 2017 -Roof 541,000 2018 - UVAC $43,000 2021 - EIxterior Paint and Caulk $2,000 Justification Expenditures 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total EquipNeNdes/Furnishings 2,500 43,000 41,000 86,500 Total 2,500 43,000 44,000 86,500 Funding Sources 2014 2015 2016 , 2017 2018 Total 403 - Equipment Replacement 2,500 43,000 41,000 86,500 Total 2,500 43,000 41,000 86,500 3-YEAR PILOT PROJEC I PROPOSM � 13 MALKERSON GU NN MARTIN LLP 1900 U.S. BANK PLAZA SOUTH TOWER 220 Sow,H SIXTH STREET MINNLAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 TF.LEPHONc, 612-344-1111 FACSimiLF 612-344-1414 TO: Bill Joynes, City Administrator FROM: Tim Keane, City Attorney RE: Southshore Community Center DATE: February 27, 2014 This memorandum is in response to discussion and consideration of options moving forward with the Southshore Community Center (the "SCC "). Please find attached a memorandum prepared by me on May 16, 2013, setting 'forth a summary of the various agreements governing the development and operation of the SCC. Over the last several years, there has emerged a stalemate by and among the Cooperative Agreement participating cities to the SCC. This impasse relates to the continued funding of the operations and maintenance of the SCC. Beyond funding the day-to-day maintenance and operation of the SSC, of particular concern is the need to fund capital improvements. The SCC building is now 17 years old and, as to be expected, basic building systems such as the roof, HVAC, kitchen equipment, window systems and mechanicals are nearing the end of their functional life. Staff has estimated the capital requirements over the next couple of years at approximately $80,000. The City of Shorewood, as the "host" and most significant (under of the SCC, is considering options available to maintain the financial vitality and control of the SCC moving forward. Please find set forth below a summary of possible options that may be the subject of further discussion. 1. Do nothing. Shorewood has the option of continuing the status quo and funding the SCC and managing/funding of the SCC on an ad hoc basis. 2. Voluntary Takeover of the SCC. The City of Shorewood could take the lead and ask the participating cities to acquiesce to relinquish their interest in the SCC and allow Shorewood to assume full responsibility for the future of the SCC. 3. Dissolution. Pursuant to Section 6 of the Cooperative Agreement, Shorewood could initiate a request for dissolution and sale of the SCC. Option 6(a), the "Shorewood Option," would require repayment by Shorewood to the remaining cities. Option 6(G), "Sale to ATTACHMENT 2 (163590DOC- 2/27/2014) Memo to Bill Joynes Page 2 February 27, 2014 a Third Party," could be highly problematic since the SCC is located on Shorewood property, subject to a lease for a term of 25 years commencing in 1996. 4. Forced Takeover of the SCC. Although the Cooperative Agreement does not contemplate a "forced voluntary acquisition," Shorewood may force a voluntary dissolution by affecting a "cash call" to other partners for the funding of capital maintenance improvements. Such a cash call would contemplate the need to re- negotiate the Agreement by and among the cities. Conclusion. All of these options require further exploration and discussion of the pros and cons, as well as political preferences. I look forward to further discussions. With regret, I will be out of town for your March 10 Work Session. TJK { 163590' .DOC- 2/27/2014 12 ALKERSON GUNN MARTIN LLP 1900 U.S. BANK PLAZA SOUTH TOWER 220 SOUTH SIXTH STREET MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 TELEPHONE 612 -344 -1111 FACSIMILE 612- 344 -1414 TO: Bill Joynes, City Administrator FROM: Tim Keane, City Attorney RE: Southshore Community Center DATE: May 16, 2013 The purpose of this memorandum is to summarize the various agreements relating to the Southshore Community Center (the "SCC" ). Set forth below are a summary of the various agreements in chronological order which are included as attachments hereto. While the initial three agreements were extensively negotiated by and among the communities with the assistance of counsel, it is not entirely clear that subsequent agreements were the subject of the negotiation, discussion and counsel. 1). Cooperative Agreement for the Southshore Senior /Community Center dated March 4,1119.96'. The Cooperative Agreement is the foundational funding framework for the SCC. As such, the five parties to this agreement heavily negotiated each provision. The Cooperative Agreement set for the terms, provisions and funding obligations of each of the parties, but was intentionally silent as to the ongoing responsibility of the parties for operation, maintenance, capital reserves and conflict resolution. Sections 6 and 7 of the Cooperative Agreement provides the terms for termination and dissolution of the agreement. 2). Easement Agreement by and among the City ,of Shorewood and the Cities of Excelsior „z Greenwood, Dee shavvenen, , and Tonka Bay dated March 4, 1996. The Easement Agreement conveys the real estate for the building and parking lot from the City of Shorewood to the other cities for a term of 25 years consistent with the terms of the Cooperative Agreement. 3). Lease Agreement between the Cities of Deephaven, Excelsior, Greenwood, Tonka Bav, and Shorewood the Cities ") as Landlord and the Friends of the South Lake Minnetonka Senior Community„ Center_as Tenant dated April 17, 1996. The Lease Agreement creates the lease covenants between the five cities under the Cooperative Agreement and the Friends of the South Lake Minnetonka Senior Community Center (the "Friends "). The initial Lease term is for 25 years with four five -year extensions. { 156571.DOC- 5/16/2013} Memo to Bill Joynes Page 2 May 16, 2013 The Lease Agreement provides the Tenant is responsible for utilities, insurance as well as repairs and maintenance. 4). Coo2erative Maintenance Agreement for the Southshore Senior /Community Center dated January 1, 2008. The Cooperative Maintenance Agreement was a one year funding commitment from the five cities to the Friends for fiscal year 2008 in the amount of $42,602.00. This one year funding was not supplemented after 2008. 5). The Rental Agreement by and between the Friends of the Smouthshore Senior /Community Center as Lessor, and Southshore Senior Partnersw_as.Lessee .dated January 1, 2009. This document appears to assign some portion of the Lease from the Friends to the Southshore Senior Partners ( "SSSP ") from March 1, 2009 to March 1, 2014. It is not clear if this Rental Agreement was intended to be a lease assignment or a subtenancy. The Lease Agreement requires Landlord approval of any sublease, assignment, or transfer of any interest in the Lease. There does not appear to be landlord approval of the Rental Agreement. 6). Agreement for Lease and Operation of the Southshore Community Center between the m Cities„ of Deephaven. Excelsior, Greenwood Shorewood and -Tonka Bay as Landlord, and the City of Shorewood as Tenant, dated June 25 2009. In June 2009 the City of Shorewood, as Tenant, entered into a Lease Agreement through December 31, 2012, with automatic renewable successive three -year terms. It is not clear if this 2009 Lease Agreement was an assignment, transfer or sublease of the Friends' interest. In any event, it appears this new Lease was approved by all five cities and should be interpreted as binding upon the Landlord and Tenant unless contested or demonstrated to the contrary. While there was no assignment or cancellation of the prior master lease with the Friends, it appears the controlling agreement for occupancy of the SCC is by the City of Shorewood as Tenant pursuant to the June 2009 Lease Agreement. ('nnrincinn The original formation documents continue to control the ownership structure and the City of Shorewood as the sole Tenant of the SCC. I recommend further modifications or understandings be prepared with the advice of counsel. Should you have any questions prior to the work session, please contact me at (612) 455 -6633. TJK N COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT FOR THE SOUTHSHORE SENIOR/COMMUNITY CENTER THIS COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT FOR THE SOUTHSHORE SENIOR/ COMMUNITY CENTER is made on this 4 day of March , 1996, by and among the City of Deephaven, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( Deephaven), the City of Excelsior, a Minnesota municipal corporation (Excelsior), the City of Greenwood, a Minnesota municipal corporation (Greenwood), the City of Shorewood, a Minnesota municipal corporation (Shorewood), and the City of Tonka Bay, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( Tonka Bay), (hereinafter collectively referred to as "Cities "). FIRST: Cities desire to develop a senior /community center (Center). The Center shall be used by senior citizens for educational and recreational activities, including, but not limited to, arts, crafts, music and other various programs of enrichment. In addition, the Center shall be used by citizens for banquets, receptions, reunions and other public and private events and other community-based activities such as those commonly provided at community centers throughout the area. SECOND: Cities desire to combine resources pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 471.59 to develop and construct the Center. NOW, THEREFORE, the parties covenant and agree as follows: 1.) Purpose. The parties have determined that each City is more economically and efficiently served by constructing and operating the Center together rather than each City constructing and operating its own community center. The parties agree that the Center shall be used by senior citizens for educational and recreational activities, including, but not limited to, arts, crafts, music and other various programs of enrichment. The Center shall also be used by citizens for banquets, receptions, reunions and other public and private events and other community -based activities such as those commonly provided at community centers throughout the area. Such programs and activities shall be consistent with the use of the surrounding and adjoining facilities. The overall guiding principle embodied in this Agreement is the mutual desire of the parties to maximize the use of the Center by all members of the Cities' respective constituencies. 2.) Ownership. The development and construction of the Center shall be financed through a pooling of resources from Cities and The Friends of the South Lake Minnetonka Senior Community Center, a Minnesota non - profit corporation with tax - exempt status pursuant to §§ 170(c)(2) and 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (Friends). Cities shall own the Center as tenants in common, with the ownership interest of each City proportionate to each City's investment in the Center. The amount of each City's investment and the proportionate ownership of each City is set forth in Exhibit A attached hereto which may be amended from time to time upon unanimous approval of the cities. The Center shall be constructed on property conveyed by Shorewood to Cities for One and 00 /100 Dollar ($1.00), and other good and valuable consideration, and which is legally described on Exhibit B attached hereto. Shorewood shall be responsible for the design and construction of the Center in accordance with the preliminary site plan and building elevation as set forth on Exhibit C attached hereto. 3.) Funding. All amounts due from Cities for the development and construction of the Center shall be remitted to Shorewood within sixty (60) days of the date of the execution of this Agreement by an authorized representative of each City. Shorewood shall be the finance manager and manager of the construction of the Center during the design and construction of the Center and shall establish separate books of account to monitor the payment of funds. The Cities shall be under no further obligation, pursuant to the terms of this Cooperative Agreement, to fund the maintenance, operation, programming or staffing of the Center or any other costs, expenses or capital investments relating to the Center. 4.) Excess Funds. Upon completion of construction of the Center, excess funds shall be held in a restricted capital reserve account for the purpose of repairs and capital replacement of the Center. This account shall be controlled by the Friends, however, no expenditure in excess of Five Thousand and 00 /100 Dollars ($5,000) shall be made without the approval of a majority of the Cities. This reserve is not intended for day -to -day maintenance such as snow removal, routine building maintenance and cleaning or for any other operating costs. 5.) Lease. Cities shall lease the Center to Friends (Friends' Lease). The term of the Friends' Lease shall be twenty -five (25) years and the rental rate shall be One and 00/100 Dollar ($1.00) per year and other good and valuable consideration. The Friends' Lease shall provide for four (4) renewal periods of five (5) years each. Friends shall operate and maintain the Center. Friends shall be required to pay for any and all forms of insurance to adequately insure the Center against any and all risks associated with operating and maintaining the Center, both known and unknown, including worker's compensation insurance for Center employees and general liability insurance up to the statutory limits of liability relating to the Center. Each policy shall name Cities as additional insureds. By entering into this Agreement, Cities do not agree to assume any risk or responsibility for the acts or omissions relating to the operation and maintenance of the Center by Friends, or for the procurement, or failure to procure, by Friends of insurance against all insurable risks, both known and unknown, related to the Center, or for the acts or omissions of any other City. 6.) Termination. Any City may terminate its participation in this Agreement at any time for any reason upon thirty (30) days written notice to the remaining Cities. The remaining Cities shall not have a right to object to any City's withdrawal from this Agreement. A withdrawing city will not have the right to participate in decisions relating to this Agreement. Withdrawal from this Agreement will not result in the forfeiture of the withdrawing City's undivided ownership interest in the Center but the withdrawing City's share of the costs incurred by the Cities pursuant to this Agreement, if any, shall be recovered out of the withdrawing City's share of any proceeds resulting from the sale or liquidation of the Center. At the termination of the lease term or termination by action and approval of the Cities, the Center may be sold subject to the following: (a) Shorewood Option. The City of Shorewood may retain the Center by repayment to each of the remaining Cities an amount equal to their original capital contribution. Shorewood may pay the remaining Cities in cash, or at its option, Shorewood may make installment payments to the Cities over a period not to exceed ten (10) years payable in equal annual installments of principal and interest at the rate of eight percent (8 %) per annum from and after the date of Termination. (b) Sale to Third Party. The Center may be sold to a third parry for fair market value. In the event of sale to a third parry, the City of Shorewood will assure adequate access to the Center. The proceeds of said sale shall be allocated and paid to each City proportionate to its original capital contribution as provided in the attached Exhibit A. (c) Proceeds from Future Gain. Should Shorewood sell the Center to a third party within ten (10) years of exercising alternative (a), the net proceeds of said sale beyond the original capital contribution paid by each of the Cities shall be allocated and paid to each City proportionate to its original capital contribution as provided in the attached Exhibit A. 7.) Dissolution, Amendment, Termination. The following may only be undertaken based on the written approval of two- thirds of the Cities: (a) Sale of the Center; (b) Amendment of this Agreement; or (c) Termination of the Lease with The Friends of South Lake Minnetonka Senior Community Center, or any renewal, extension, assignment or subleasing thereof or successor thereto. The following may be undertaken upon written approval of a majority of the Cities: (a) Capital improvements; or (b) City directed changes in the operation of the Center. 8.) Governing Law. This Agreement shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Cities of Deephaven, Excelsior, Greenwood, Shorewood and Tonka Bay, in accordance with the authorizing resolution from their respective City Councils, have caused this Agreement to be duly executed. CITY OF DEEPHAVEN Dated: 3 l y l 9 �- Its: City Clerk Treasu er J �� Dated: 2/28/96 Dated: -!Z i ,, 8 I q �, Dated: Dated: 022696.2 2/28/96 2/28/96 C By: Its: Ma or CITY OF EXCELSIOR Faw No By Its: CITY OF GREENWOOD n By: 0. In C Its: City (Clerk) Administrator d CITY OF SHOREWOOD I � By: 4 ti CC j L/- Its: City (Clerk) Administrator By:�'� Its: Mayor By: Its: City (Clerk) Administrator B Its: l EXHIBIT A City $ Contribution % Contribution Shorewood $ 3111000 50.00% Excelsior 90,812 14.60% Greenwood 24,569 3.95% Deephaven 1391639 22.45% Tonka Bay 55,980 9.00% $ 622,000 100.00% COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT EXHIBIT B DESCRIPTION OF PARCEL TO BE DEEDED TO THE SENIOR COIYiMUNITY CENTER That part of Lot 12, Block 2, ECHO HILLS 2ND ADDITION, and of Lot 27, Auditors Subdivision 133, according to the plats on file in the office of the County Recorder, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at a point in the centerline of Smithtown Road distant 645.00 feet easterly from an intersection of the northerly extension of the west line of said Lot 27 with said centerline; thence southerly parallel with the west line of said Lot 27 a distance of 34.19 feet to the point of beginning of the land to be described; thence South 00 degrees 29 minutes 57 seconds East, assumed bearing, along a line parallel with the west line of said Lot 27 and the west line of said Lot 12 a distance of 104.00 feet; thence South 76 degrees 20 minutes 42 seconds East 45.00 feet; thence South 15 degrees 30 minutes 36 seconds East 45.00 feet; thence South 76 degrees 20 minutes 42 seconds East 57.05 feet; thence North 66 degrees 48 minutes 24 seconds East 34.92 feet; thence North 34 degrees 25 minutes 43 seconds East 30.00 feet; thence North 00 degrees 29 minutes 57 seconds West, parallel with the west line of said Lots 12 and 27, a distance of 160.00 feet to a point in the north line of said Lot 12; thence South 84 degrees 37 minutes 48 seconds West 94.66 feet; thence South 74 degrees 29 minutes 24 seconds West 68.00 feet to the point of beginning. Said parcel contains 26,000 square feet more or less Together with a permanent easement for parking purposes over, under and across that part of said Lots 12 and 27 described as follows: Commencing at a point in the centerline of Smithtown Road distant 645.00 feet easterly from an intersection of the northerly extension of the west line of said Lot 27 with said centerline; thence South 00 degrees 29 minutes 57 seconds East 138.19 feet to the southwest corner of the above described parcel and to the point of beginning of the easement to be described; thence South 00 degrees 29 minutes 57 seconds East 27.00 feet; thence South 74' degrees 29 minutes 24 seconds West 4.00 feet; thence South 15 degrees 30 minutes 36 seconds East 55.00 feet; thence South 74 degrees 29 minutes 24 seconds West 55.00 feet; thence North 15 degrees 30 minutes 36 seconds West 55.00 feet; thence South 74 degrees 29 minutes 24 seconds West 91.00 feet; thence South 00 degrees 29 minutes 57 seconds East 139.77 feet; thence North 74 degrees 29 minutes 24 seconds East 284.59 feet; thence North 00 degrees 29 minutes 57 seconds West 58.60 feet; thence North 34 degrees 25 minutes 4' ) seconds East 22.40 feet to the southeasterly comer of the above described parcel; thence westerly and northwesterly along the southwesterly line of said above described parcel to the point of beginning. Together with the right of ingress and egress to and from the Country Club Road Contains 31,452 square feet more or less. SP Z2 "35 14:07 031 1 �L—lz, MN a • rn r'f Ln Q 3-- Co � � �! Z = i �� - SMI THTOWN ROAD _o i `_`� 'a 00 C 4 - -- -.. . - -- ° -'- N84- 3V E N8 7� q N = o % ^3Q' FRONT SETSACX �, O O O LL. t I O Zo L O PROPOSED w I N BUILDING r p PARCEL TO BE DEEDE z !J. S7g� cv 4,,,, O N74 ° 29' 24 "'E ---' N UN > �- 2gl 24 o p s6° 48?4492 ,.<v N� a" Gin �. Cls : UILOING L" CT1 7 gl 11 _ WA red WELL `n i t2'41P`p�E \Z NG EAScE� co N In J -_ O O M _ Z r Z 28x•59 go2g`.24 w SZ 4 TO COUNTRY CLUB ROAD aNI �. °II�LLr ya.vU lo. I /wi tt1 iCiif(>a(O �..� yM� fD..O .Kif �[�. �.: •t "R SCALH 7'• a io FEET Drown ay: Orr Drawing TRIe Comm. 'lo. J. M. sclleten EXHIBIT Yape:on & 5572./0 Date: Assoeintea. Inc. REV. Arcn7t..L.. 714".ei aSLLr�yon sheet NO. 09/22/95 ``. i. a Ana 09/21/96 Vi SHOREWOOD , MINNESOTA 3 )TT.OD.SIR,.��y I Co.35 T:t. EL;.,7gM Time 901 10:011, 11:011, 12:011 1:01, 2:011,, 3:011, 4:011, 5:011, 6:011 7:011', 8:011, MIC Southshore Center Average Week Hours of Availability MCES Programming - 48 hrs/wk x 45 weeks Rental Hours - 27 hrs/wk x 52 weeks = Site Manager ho u rs - 20 h rs/w k x 48 weeks Desk Assistants Budget covers approx. 80% of available use hours Assumes no overlap of hours 30: 0 z M 1 0 1 I 0 No' 0 1: EA LA IM 0 z = 3,564 EMIL, F, MMA 0 X fr II r: 0 Z I X.4 511. 111 Southshore Center Ongoing Activities and Recurring Rentals Southshore Senior Regular Programs Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday 8 am - Dance Ball 9 am - Card 8 am - Dance 12 pm - Lunch 8 am - Dance Ball Crafters Fitness 9 am - Quilting 9:30 am - Wood 9 am - Quilting 1 pm - Bridge Class Carvers Group 12 pm - Lunch 12pm - Lunch 12:30 - Cards & 1 pm - Mahjong 1 pm - Bingo Games 1:00 Beading Group - NEW On -going Senior Programs that the Center schedules AAA (since 2009) - $40 -58 - These classes are held either during the day or evening. AARP Taxes (several years) - One day a week from February until April 15. Flu Clinic (several years) - One day in the fall Tai Chi (since 2009) - Mondays at 10:00 am - center gets 25% of income. Ted Talks (since 2010) — Thursdays at 11:00 am, once a month On -going activities Just for Kix (since 2009) - Monday nights - fee $55 per night Zumba (since 2012) - Mondays or Thursdays - center gets 25% of income Mrs. M (since 2012) - Varies on days and times - center gets 25% of income Life Line Screening (since 2012) - Every three months - $199.00 VFW (since 2009) - 2nd Wednesday of the month Yearly Recurring Rentals 1st Student (since 2012) - Daytime rental (7:30 -3:30) - $242 Just for Kix Dance Banquet (since 2012) - Evening rental (3:30 -7:30) - $180 Cornerstone Nome School Formal Dance (since 2010) - Friday (3 pm - Midnight) - $450 Suddendorf Needlepoint Weekend (since 2012) - 8:00 - 4:30 - $296 Paul Gillund Training (since 2011) - Saturday (7:00am - 4:00pm) - $400 Attachment 3 Southshore Center On -going Activities and Rentals - Page 2 of 2 Yearly Recurring Rentals, continued Minnetonka Softball Banquet (since 2010) - Evening (5:00 -8:00) - $185 Historical Society Banquet (since 2010) - Evening (6:00 -9:00) - $122 Lake Minnetonka Steamboat Committee (since 2010) - Evening (5:00 -8:30) - $229 Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (since 2011) - Times varies - $231 League of Women Voters (since 2006) - Evening (6:30 -8:30) - $76 Excelsior Fire District Auxillary (since 2010) - Evening (6:00- 10:00) - $80 Friends of the Excelsior Library (since 2010) - Evening (6:00 -9:00) - $50 Minnetonka Ward Youth Church Group (10/13 — 5/14) Wednesday Evening (7:00 -8:30) $64 Martin Hage church group — (11/13- ongoing) Sundays (10:00— 2:00) $90 Homeowners Associations Recurring Rentals (fee varies from $50 - $150) Amesbury West (since 2006) Marsh Pointe (since 2011) Gideon Woods (since 2006) Excelsior Bay Gables (since 2007) Waterford (since 2008) Boulder Bridge (since 2009) Barrington (since 2013) Christmas Parties, Recurring Yearly Rients (next 3 years) - Saturday (12:00 -6:00) - $188 Synder (since 2009) - Sunday (1:00- 10:00pm) - $390 Mens Garden Club (since 2006) - Evening (5:00- 9:00pm) - $230 Riesgraf (since 2010) - Saturday (11 am - 6pm) - $378 Pike (since 2009) - Christmas Eve (5:00- 9:00pm) - $194 NOTE: This list does not include one -time rentals for events such as weddings, funerals, birthday parties, showers, kitchen rentals, organizational and community group meetings, and others. There were approximately seventy (70) one -time rentals during 2013. There were sixteen (16) events that went past 9:00 pm during 2013.