Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
05-12-14 CC Reg Mtg Agenda P
CITY OF SHOREWOOD CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MONDAY, MAY 12, 2014 AGENDA 1. CONVENE CITY COUNCIL MEETING A. Roll Call 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7:00 P.M. Mai or Zerb Hotvet Siakel Sundberg Woodruff Attachments B. Review Agenda 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. City Council Regular Meeting Minutes, April 28, 2014 Minutes 3. CONSENT AGENDA - Motion to approve items on Consent Agenda & Adopt Resolutions Therein: NOTE: Give the public an opportunity to request an item be remo>>ed from the Consent Agenda. Comments can be taken or questions asked following remo>>al from Consent Agenda A. Approval of the Verified Claims List Claims List B. Approve Transfer of Funds to Close Deficits Finance Director's memo 4. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR (No Council action Nvill be taken) 5. PUBLIC HEARING A. Public Hearing for Sunnyvale Lane Improvements, City Project 14 -01, Engineer's memo, Ordering Improvements and Preparation of Plans and Specifications Resolution 6. REPORTS AND PRESENTATIONS A. Report by Josh Leddy of the Lake Minnetonka Association, and resident Jack Kimball memo Kimball, on the 2014 Milfoil Project and Funding B. Presentation by Council Member Hotvet of the Lake Minnetonka Scenic Resolution BN-N-,-aN- Concept 7. PARKS CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA — MAY 12, 2014 Page 2of2 8. PLANNING A. Report by Sue Davis on the May 6, 2014 Planning Commission meeting B. Appeal Notice of Violation Appellant: Tom Kiefer Location: 28150 Boulder Bridge Drive C. Appeal Notice of Violation Appellant: Marl-, Klesk Location: 4390 Enchanted Point D. Appeal Notice of Violation Appellant: Michael Hoy Location: 25480 SmithtoN -,n Rd 9. ENGINEERING /PUBLIC WORKS A. Summit Avenue Roadway Alternatives B. City Request for Speed Study on Summit Avenue C. Lake Minnetonka LRT Regional Trail Overpass at County Road 19 10. GENERAL /NEW BUSINESS A. Proposed Change to the South Lake Minnetonka Police Department Joint PoNvers Agreement 11. OLD BUSINESS 12. STAFF AND COUNCIL REPORTS A. Administrator and Staff 1. Update on Country Club Road Speed Awareness Display B. Mavor and Citv Council 13. ADJOURN Attachments Planning Director's memo Planning Director's memo Planning Director's memo Engineer's memo Engineer's memo, Resolution Engineer's memo Administrator's memo Director of Public Works' memo CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 Country Club Road • Shorewood, Minnesota 55331 . 952- 960 -7900 Fax: 952- 474 -0128 • -,N-ww.ci.shorewood.mn.us • citchall 'ciici.shorewood.mn.us Executive Summary Shorewood City Council Regular Meeting Monday, May 12, 2014 7:00 p.m. 6:00 PM – Executive Session is scheduled. Agenda Item #3A: Enclosed is the Verified Claims List for Council approval. Agenda Item 4313: Staff recommends Council authorize the transfer of cash to cover deficits from 2013 in the Southshore Center Fund and Trail Construction Fund. Agenda Item 44: Matters from the Floor— members of the public have an opportunity to address the Council on an issue not on the agenda; no Council action Nvill be taken. Agenda Item 45: A public hearing on the proposed Nvatermain extension for Sunnyvale Lane Improvement project (City Project 14 -01) Neill be held this evening. Agenda Item 46A: Josh Leddy, Bay Project Manager and Board of Directors member for the Lake Minnetonka Association, and Jack Kimball, Shorewood resident, Nvill be present to provide an update on the 2014 Milfoil Project and annual funding request. Agenda Item 4613: Councilmember Hotvet Nvill make a presentation on the Lake Minnetonka Scenic BN - -NvaN- Concept. A resolution authorizing a feasibility study for a Lake Minnetonka Scenic B)-N-,-a)- Concept is provided for Council's consideration. Additional background information Nvas provided under separate cover. Agenda Item 47: There are no park items this evening. Agenda Item 48A: Planning Commissioner Sue Davis is scheduled to report on the recent Planning Commission meeting. Agenda Item 48B: Tom Kiefer has asked for additional time to finish repairing his son's van that has been jacked up in the drivewa -,T at 28150 Boulder Bridge Drive since February. His son also disagrees Nvith a zoning violation letter that advises him not to store a commercial piece of equipment (Bobcat) on residential property. Staff recommends approval of a two Nveek extension for repair of the vehicle in question, after which administrative penalties Nvill begin to accrue. With respect to the Bobcat, if it is to be use on the residential lot, it must be stored inside the garage. Agenda Item 48C: Mark Klesk has requested additional time to remove a large shipping container from his property at 4390 Enchanted Point. Road restrictions, which come off this Friday, have delayed the removal of the container. Given the appellant's cooperation to date, staff recommends an extension to 23 May. Executive Summary — City Council Meeting of Magi 12, 2014 Page 2of2 Agenda Item 48D: Michael Hov has requested additional time to comply Nvith code violations on his property at 25560 SmithtoN -,n Road. In light of progress already made, staff recommends an extension to 27 Mav to correct all violations cited. Agenda Item 49A: Information is provided for discussion of alternatives for Summit Avenue roadvmv alternatives. No council action is required at this time. Agenda Item 4913: A resolution is provided for council's consideration of requesting the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MNDOT) conduct a traffic investigation/speed study on Summit Avenue between Hummingbird Lane (City of Chanhassen, Carver County) and Murrav Hill Road in the Citv of Shorewood. Agenda Item 49C: The Three Rivers Park District is requesting the city approve the plans for the Lake Minnetonka LRT Regional Trail Overpass of County Road 19. It should be noted that although the Park District can move fonvard N ith this project Nvithout city consent, staff is recommending the city fonvard its concerns regarding pedestrian surface crossing safety to the Park District. Agenda Item 410A: At the South Lake Minnetonka Police Department ( SLMPD) Coordinating Committee meeting on April 15, the committee voted (3 -1, N ith Shorewood in opposition) to consider a proposed amendment to the Joint PoNvers Agreement for the SLMPD that Nvould allow the annual budget to be approved on a simple majoritN- vote. Further information and discussion Nvill be provided at the meeting. Agenda Item 411: There are no items of old business this evening. Agenda Item 412.A.1.: Staff has provided a speed distribution, by percentage, of traffic on Country Club Road from December 18, 2013 — Mav 8, 2014. Additional information Nvill be presented on Monday night. Agenda Items 41213: Mayor and City Council Members may report on recent activities. CITY OF SHOREWOOD CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MONDAY, APRIL 28, 2014 MINUTES 1. CONVENE CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING Mayor Zerby called the meeting to order at 7:00 P.M. A. Roll Call Present. Mayor Zerby Councilmembers Hotvet, Sundber Administrator Joynes; City Cleric Panchyshyn; Public Works Brovm, and, City Engineer Hornbv Absent: Councilmember Siakel B. Review Agenda Sundberg moved, Woodruff seconded, approving the agenda 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. City Council Special Meeting Minutes, Aprill Woodruff moved, Sundberg seconded, Approving the City April 14, 2014, as presented. Motion passed 4/0. #2A _57_5_5 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7:00 P.M. Woodruff Attornev Keane; Citv ;e Director DeJong; Director of Motion passed 4/0. cil Special Meeting Minutes of B. City Council Work,Session Minutes, April 14,2014 Woodruff moved; 'Hotvet seconded, Approving the City Council Work Session Minutes of April 14, 2014, as presented. Motion passed 4/0. C' > City Council Regular Meeting Minutes, April 14,2014 Woodruff moved, Zerby seconded, Approving the City Council Regular Meeting Minutes of April 14, 2014, as presented. Motion passed 4/0. 3. CONSENT AGENDA Mayor Zerby revieN ed the items on the Consent Agenda. Hotvet moved, Woodruff seconded, Approving the Motions Contained on the Consent Agenda and Adopting the Resolutions Therein. A. Approval of the Verified Claims List B. Authorization to Hire Two Seasonal Public Works Employees CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES April 14, 2014 Page 2 of 15 C. Adopting RESOLUTION NO. 14 -027, "A Resolution Establishing Policy for Sign Retroreflectivity Assessment and Management" subject to changing Article IV, Paragraph 4, Sentence 3 to read "The city completed its sign inventory in 2013 ". Motion passed 4/0. 4. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR Alan Yelsev, 26335 Peach Circle, noted he has lived in Shorewood for 30 years. He explained he is representing a group of determined people who are concerned that the City does not have a policy regarding protecting Nvater. The group believes the City needs to have a comprehensive policy that states how and when chemicals Nvill be used in and by the Citv and how Nv aste Will be dealt Nvith in the City; not only for the City, but also for businesses and consumers. There are towns," all over the United States, including the City of Edina, that are far ahead of the City when it comes to adopting such comprehensive policies. He requested residents be given the opportunity to provide input on a policy. He stated from his perspective he had a very negative interaction Nvith City staff regarding his requestthat the City consider policies. His request Nvas rejected outright. He came before Council during August 2013.with his request. To date no action has been taken. Mr. Yelsev stated Shorewood residents Nvant input into what g6es' on related to the use of chemicals and toxic materials. They Nvant a comprehensive study and policy and decision malting process about what to do. More research needs to be done. The group has done considerable research and it Nvill not tolerate the use of triclopyr in the City N ithout further input and consideration from the residents. The group believes that an-,- use of chemicals in the Citv should be taken very seriously. They believe in a minimalist approach. He noted that Edina and other communities have implemented reasonable policies. The policies do not prohibit any use of chemicals, but are to some extent restrictive especially when little is knoN -,n about a chemical. The policies apply to residents, people who apply- the chemicals commercially and the cities themselves. The thing that really, got his attention and the group's attention is the City is using the chemicals Nvithout input from residents'. They have asked in a letter to City staff that the City create a vehicle for residents to have input and to research the impact of chemicals. To date he believes that request has been rejected. He noted that the group is asking for a fast track review of advanced policies that other municipalities have. He explained the 'City is located in a, very lowland area and there is a tremendous amount of stormAvater�that flows through it carrying particulates around. The aquifers and private Nvells are in a very delicate position of possibly being damaged. If the drinking Nvater in the City is damaged the property values decline, the costs are incredible and the toll on people is amazing. He stated the group has researched Parkinson's disease and multiple sclerosis and there are links to some of the chemicals he is talking about Nvith those autoinuune diseases. He stated the group Nvantws the drinking Nvater to be protected and it does not think the City is taking the proper precautions. The group Neill act very quickly if the City does not act on the residents' behalf or at least involve residents in the Council and staff decision making process about policy for the City and policy to help protect the residents from themselves. He then stated the City has used triclopyr in parks and used it in Nvays that he does not think Nvere absolutely necessary (e.g., the removal of buckthorn). That chemical has a history of potential damage. Only one half of the ingredients in that product are knoN -,n. The other half are undisclosed which is common for pesticides and herbicides. The people who suspect what the undisclosed ingredients are believe they are quite hazardous as Nvell even in very, very small quantities. The idea that parts per million CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES April 14, 2014 Page 3 of 15 cannot hurt a person is not true. There is no medical science that supports that. He noted that he cannot think that there is anything more important for Council and staff to be doing than putting policies in place that Nvould help protect drinking Nvater. He noted that he rejects eves- N-thing in the letter he received from Director Brov'n. He stated he could Nvalk through that point by point. He then stated he thought the letter Nvas non participative. He asked BroN -,n if he N -,-rote the letter himself or did someone participate in writing it. BroN -,n clarified he N -,-rote an email to him. Mr. Yelsev stated he is going to present his response to what Director Mavor Zerbv stated it Nvould be more productive for the City to writing. Mr. Yelsev stated he needs Council and staff to hear that the is response Nvas unacceptable. He then stated he does not Nvant the and particularly by City staff. He Nvent on to state that if C outpouring of residents in the Council Chambers he asked, thal notice and they Nvill come and demand Council direct staff to taken and a mechanism created to allow the residents to have t science applied to how chemicals are used. Councilmember Sundberg thanked Mr. Yelsey fox while noting she does not think anyone on Counci is a very important issue for the City to look into. She stated from her perspective this couples Nvith 1 use, chemical use and so forth. protecting drinking N-,-hat the next step should be. She then stated she from residents and to niove'auicldv on this. ,pt the Mr. Yelsev s counterpoints in is serious enough< and that the Citv's king Nvater in the City to be poisoned ;il and staff Nvant to see ,a massive dents give them tN -,-O,to four Nveeks' action. Or, proactive action can be voices heard and to have reason and the pressure can Council and staff about this, iy threats about it. She stated she thought this ed that she needs to learn more about the issues. s Whole approach to the environment — energy is a national issue. She stated she does not know is Mr. Yelsev s suggestion to solicit more input Councilmember Woodruff stated he does not remember'seeing the correspondence from Director Brown to Mr. Yelsey, He suggested Council and staff discuss this issue in a Nvork session before deciding on what direction to take. He stated he dries not have enough knowledge to make any decisions about what to do about the issue. Hotvet stated she supports discussing this in a Nvork session in the near future A the topics Councilmember Sundberg brought up. Mavor Zerbv stated he also supports discussing this in a Nvork session and noted that Mr. Yelsey and the public Nvill also be invited o it. He thanked Mr. Yelsey for bringing this to Council's attention again. Mr. Yelsev stated every one needs to be educated about the use of and impact of chemicals. He then stated protecting pollinating bees is also part of this effort. The chemical he is talking about is also on the list of chemicals that damage bees. Mavor Zerbv asked Mr. Yelsev if he or his group is involved Nvith Nvorking Nvith state and federal legislatures on this issue. Mr. Yelsey responded he is involved Nvith a group that is crafting a draft polio* set for communities around the country*. Thev have looked at other very good policies and he believes Council should look at others as Nvell. There is no need to start from scratch. CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES April 14, 2014 Page 4 of 15 Councilmember Woodruff asked who makes up the group Mr. Yelsey refers to. Mr. Yelsey stated it's a group of about twenty residents in Shorewood and he is involved with a national group as well. Woodruff stated he would like to be provided with the name of the national group. Councilmember Sundberg asked that be forwarded to all of Council. Mr. Yelsey stated he will do that along with his perspective on the items in Director BroN -,n's email. Mavor Zerbv asked him to send it to Administrator Jovnes and him. Alan Dvorak, 5925 Cathcart Drive, noted that he and his wife tn- to keep their yard as organic as possible as do a lot of their neighbors. He stated that last Near a chemical truck was being driven down Cathcart Drive and chemicals were being sprayed along the right- of -Nvav (ROW). His wife chased the truck driver down and the driver told her he was doing what he was hired to do. The truck driver stopped spraying and returned later in the day only to see his wife outside and he drove aN-,a-, . The driver "came by again and did not see his wife so he finished the spray job which he observed. Those chemicals don't just stay in the ROW. The use of chemicals is ven- concerning to he and his Nvife; the same goes for a lot of people. He encouraged Council to take what Mr. Yelsey said very seriously. Residents have a right to know if chemicals are being sprayed and they have a right to ask that it be stopped. Peter Holmberg, 5955 Cajed Lane, noted he was present to talk sidewalk that was constructed last Near which he was pleased abot indicating that some remediation work was going to be done in the near the corner for 30 years. Because of the recent heavy rains he ha explained the stormNvater flows down Beverly Drive down Cajed La stormNvater ponded up significantly at the ramp at the end of the si basin because it has to flow past the ramp and up to,the catch basin. the new Smithtown Road Nvest received a letter from the Citv ect area. He stated he has lived observed the most flooding ever. He It flattens out at the corner and the ewalk. It does not flow to the catch is his understanding that one of the catch basins was eliminated on the Cajed Lane side and# it would have helped catch some of the stormNvater before it reached the ramp. He expressed concern that it will be a constant mud hole there because the stormwater brings a lot of sand and mud with it. When snov melt refreezes there is ice at the end of the ramp. Mr. Holmberg stated he hopes the City does not use the contractor that built the sidewalk again. There were 80° summer days in 2013.N-, hen no one was Nvorking "on the project. He heard the penalty clauses in the contract were not strong enough t6'get the contractor to Nvork on the project. In the fall there was a scramble to get the prqj*ect mainly done. He noted he lvorks commercial construction and therefore knows what a construction crew can get done" in a ven- short amount of time. He stated from his perspective that was one of the worst projects he had seen done in 30 years. He clarified it's a wonderful sidewalk, the entire concept was good. People are happy With the improvements. But, from his vantage point the City is not getting what it paid for. The project area has not been graded correctly. He stated he hopes the corner can get fixed. Mayor Zerby thanked r. Holmberg for making Council and staff aware of the issue. Engineer Hornby stated he, had been to the area earlier in the day and he had someone taking photographs of the problem drainage areas. He explained that some of the issues are related to erosion control. As an erosion control measure several of the catch basins have a sheet of geotextile fabric in them. When there is a significant rain and sediment the fabric plugs up and backs up water. Staff did contact the contractor that morning and asked the contractor to take care of those issues. The contractor had someone out there in the afternoon. The last email he received from the contractor which was around 4:00 P.M. indicated the stormwater was flowing down at the two worst areas where ponding was being created in a couple of yards. The contractor is supposed to check all of the catch basins. There are a couple of pedestrian ramps that needs more grading around them to get the water off of the roadway behind the ramp into a ditch and to the catch basin. That will be addressed with the final punch list. CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES April 14, 2014 Page 5 of 15 Mayor Zerby stated the recent heavy rain is a good test of the system and it points out issues that need to be addressed. Engineer Hornby stated Nvhat Nvas used for an erosion control measure is not working out very Nvell. Staff is in the process of getting that addressed. 5. PUBLIC HEARING None. 6. REPORTS AND PRESENTATIONS A. Review of 2014 Assessments by Hennepin County Assessor Michael Smerdon Michael Smerdon, an appraiser for Hennepin County, noted he had received a list of questions that Council Nvanted answered. He stated he Nvill answer them this evening. He noted the, 2014 assessment process Nvill be used to calculate taxes payable in 2015. Mr. Smerdon explained the overall approach for establishing, residential market values. Soon after the appeals are over this year the appraisers Neill start reevaluation: By state law the appraiser must review 20 percent of the properties in a city each year, The review includes looking at characteristics to make sure Nvhat is being used in the model is actually what's there. In the fall they get the permits from the city and they go out and look at everything they think would have changed the value of the property. After that they analyze all of the sales. For taxes payable in 2015 they take the sales from September 1, 2012, to October 1, 2013. That is the sales ratio period set by the Minnesota Department of Revenue (MDOR). Property values Neill be set on January 2 each year. In the springy; everyone gets their valuation notices. Property ovmers can appeal their valuations. When people call to appeal an appraiser will ask the property owner why they think their valuation is v Tong. If an appraiser has not been through the house recently they will inspect the house to ensure the characteristics are correct. The inspection takes about 10 minutes. The appraisal process is the same as the one used, in previous years. The same process is used for all cities in Hennepin County. Mr. Smerdon noted for property taxes due the current year there is nothing an appraiser can do about the taxes. Councilmember Woodruff stated he provided the questions. He then stated that he had heard for a number of years that there is a MDOR mandate that the assessed value be 90 percent of the market value. Mr. Smerdon explained the MDOR specifies the median sales ratio must be between 90 percent and 105 percent for the city-. The state also requires the assessment has to be 100 percent of the market value on January 2. Mr. Smerdon noted he spends about one -half of his time educating property owners about the assessment and valuation process. Mr. Smerdon explained that the overall increase for ShoreNvood's residential assessed values Nvas 7.6 percent. It Nvas 4.9 percent for off -lake properties and 9 percent for on -lake properties. The increase Nvas all over the place for different cities. The City of Woodland lost a little value for off -lake property values. The City of Excelsior's off -lake values went up 23 percent. For the City of Wayzata's on -lake values remained relativel�T flat. The Cit�T of Minnetonka Beach's on -lake values went up close to 28 percent. The CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES April 14, 2014 Page 6 of 15 values are due to market demand. Excelsior's values increased in part because of the doN -,ntoN -,n area and Nvalkability. Mr. Smerdon then explained there are statistical measures used to grade assessments. One of them measures how far awa -,T assessed values are from the median. A market conditions adjusted price (MCAP) is compared against the assessed value to get a ratio. The ratio has to be between 90 — 105 percent. The median ratio for the City has to be that. The price related differential is used to ensure the assessments are neither regressive nor progressive; so loNver value properties are valued at the same rate as higher value properties. Mr. Smerdon stated the assessors do not look at the change in assessed value as a goal. For 2014 the market in 2013 Nvas folloNved to ensure assessment values Nvere at the target ratio. Mr. Smerdon explained the MCAP is the adjusted sales price that is used in all sales ratios. The MCAP is the same as a time adjustment If it is determined the market is going up 10 percent in a Near and a house sells in June then the folloNving January property should be' vv orth'5 percent more based on the market increase. Councilmember Woodruff asked how an increase in market value is determined. Mr. Smerdon responded that is done by the MDOR. MDOR does a statistical analysis based, on a 21 -month study. Woodruff asked if that has changed. Mr. Smerdon explained the MDOR has been doing that for a couple of Nears; he did not think MDOR used it five Nears ago. The use of it came about because one city wanted to lower the values because they saw the market going dawn faster than what the traditional sales analysis shoNved. The MDOR analysis Nvorks in both an upward and 'downward market. It is supposed to take all of the sales and normalize them to the January 2 date. The market value is different for different cities. Mr. Smerdon stated that for 2014 assessment the on -lake adjustment Nvas 12.3 percent annually and the off -lake adjustment Nvas 9,48 percent ammalIv. If an off- -lake house sold in January 2013 m order to make it equal to January 2, 2014; the sale price Nvould have to be increased by 9.48 percent. That Nvould be the number used for a target in the sales ratio. has never participated in this type of discussion. He then stated Council has delegated to 'Hennepin County the responsibility for assessments. Mr. Smerdon explained the Hennepin County Assessor's Office has received a lot of calls this Near about increased assessed values. The 'Values are all based on sales from the previous Near. As an example a property sold ' in September 2013 for $441,000. After applying the market conditions adjustment the January 2, 2014, the market value Nvould be $454,936. That is 100 percent of market value. The building value is calculated in the County Assessors computer system and it comes out to be $277,000. To get to the target sales ratio of 91 percent the indicated land value Nvould be $137,000. If the land value is an increase over the previous year's land value it is applied to everyone in the neighborhood. If there are multiple sales in the neighborhood the median land value increase is applied to the neighborhood. He clarified neighborhoods are not necessarily geographical neighborhoods. They are areas N ithin a city that react the same to the market. Mavor Zerbv stated it seems values in Shorewood are close to what they Nvere in 2008. Mr. Smerdon stated he does not know that history and noted that this is the first Near he is doing residential assessing. Councilmember Woodruff thanked Mr. Smerdon for answering his questions. He stated this evening single - family residential properties Nvere discussed. There are different percentages for multi dwelling CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES April 14, 2014 Page 7 of 15 units and commercial properties. He encouraged residents to come to the May 5 open book meeting if they Nvant to talk to an assessor about the estimated market value of their property or to call the assessor. The open book meeting is first come first served. Mr. Smerdon stated in Nears past it has not been an issue; there have been two assessors present. Woodruff stated he had received a call from a property owner on the northeast side of the City whose property value Nvent up 25 percent and there had been no change to that property. Another property owner's value Nvent up 6 percent and there had been no change to the property. In the area Nvhere he lives it seems the common increase Nvas around 19 percent Nvhile some are in the 5.4 percent range. Mr. Smerdon encouraged property owners who may Nvant to appeal 2015 to call an assessor before the meeting. If an assessor has not insl that Nvould be step number one. The phone number is on the valuation Mayor Zerbv stated Hennepin County Assessor's Office is 5:00 — 7:00 P.M. at Citv Hall. Mr. Smerdon stated he thought there Nvill be three or four assessors for commercial and two for residential. Mavor Zerbv asked Mr. Smerdon to desci explained if an inspection is needed an ; assessor decides there is reason to reduce them what they think the new estimated what the next ste ,sor will do that new valuation the assessor will send a new valuatiot disagree the property owner has the right to file an app, is a more formal appeal process. That Board is comprised o Councilmember Woodruff stated if property owners do too late to do anything about their property valuation in r "estimated market values for d the house for 10 or 15 Nears n; it is (952) 249 -4641. book meeting on May 5 from at the open book meeting; one fter an appeal is made. Mr. Smerdon assessor will review the file. If the assessor wiill contact the property owner and tell should be. If the property owner agrees with the ie property owner and assessor still ennepin County Board of Appeals; it with a background in real estate. seven ke advantage of the appeal process it will be when they receive their tax notice. Mayor Zerb} stated a resident in the audience, stated his off -lake property value increased 9.4 percent. That property in Boulder, Bridge has 'decded access to the lake. The property owner wants to know if his property has the same percentage increase as an on -lake property. Mr. Smerdon stated because the property has deeded access it is considered an on -lake property. Zerbv then stated ,another person N-,-ho owns a property on Enchanted Island asked if a foreclosure sale sets the sale price, Mr. Smerdon explained that according to the MDOR foreclosures are not included in the sales study and noted that assessors look at each property sale individually. There are auction properties that rise to the market value. Mayor Zerbv thanked Mr. Smerdon for coming. 7. PARKS 8. PLANNING A. Minor Subdivision Applicant: Janie Korin Location: 6135 Cathcart Drive CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES April 14, 2014 Page 8 of 15 Administrator Joynes explained that Janie Korin, 6135 Cathcart drive, proposes to subdivide her and her husband's property and has submitted an application to do so. The property is located in the R -lA, Single - Family Residential zoning district and contains approximately five acres. The applicant proposes to divide the property into two lots. The lot wvth the applicant's house on it Nvould be 87,106 square feet. The vacant lot Nvould be 113,335 square feet wvth a large amount of it being occupied by a Nvetland area. The applicant Nvill have to pay a $5,000 park dedication fee and $1,200 local sanitary seNver access charge for the new lot. As a condition of approval the applicant has to do a verification of the delineation in May. The current delineation is more than five years old. The recording of the resolution has been given 60 days so the applicant has time to get the delineation verification done. The Planning Commission has recommended approval of the subdivision on a 4/0 vote. Mayor Zerby noted the applicant is present this evening. Planning Commissioner Labadie stated both of the lots Nvould of 40,000 square feet for the R -lA zoning district. The Nvetlar and the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District does not accedt'd Mayor Zerby stated he thought this would be a< good use of Commission for considering this item. Woodruff moved, Hotvet seconded, Adopting RESOLUTH Approving Subdivision of Real Property for Steve and Janie 1F 6135 Cathcart Drive" subject to the wetland delineation and core being verified as soon in May as the Minnehaha Creek W delineation and to recording the resolution within 60 days of Con 9. ENGINEERING /PUBLIC WORKS A. A Director Brown stated the mec of the costs for tv(o,repla,ceme components. The total cos't for traded off to the dealer. The t approval process. The CIP ha execute all 'of the proposals ar in values of the ex sting trucks Expenditure of Iv exceed the minimum lot size on had',been done in Mav 2004 older than five years. land. He thanked the Planning 10. 14 -028, "A Resolution for the Property Located at iding conservation easements ted District will accept the )proval. Motion passed 4/0. (2) Single Axel Dump Trucks packet includes ascopy of a memorandum from him which outlines all igle axle dump trucks. As noted in the memorandum there are several truck is $155,491.83. The trade in values of the existing trucks will be were ,discussed during the 2015 capital improvement program (CIP) A $330.000 total for the two trucks. Staff is seeking authorization to stracts for the truck components and to spend $310,983.66. The trade be traded off to the dealer. Councilmember Woodruff asked at Nvhat point should the City start considering alternate fuel vehicles such as natural gas vehicles, Brown responded he had not considered that but can do so. Woodruff stated it Nvould likely add a little to the cost and hopefully it Nvould be a significant savings over a fifteen -year life cycle. Councilmember Sundberg stated compressed natural gases have gotten to be very economical and there are incentives for those buying type of vehicles. She also recommended looking into them. Sundberg moved, Woodruff seconded, approving the expenditure of funds in the amount of $310,983.66 for two single axle dump trucks. Motion passed 4/0. 10. GENERAL /NEW BUSINESS A. Letter of Support for Legislative Bills Related to Bees and other Pollinators CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES April 14, 2014 Page 9 of 15 Mayor Zerby stated the meeting packet contains a copy of two draft letters expressing Council's support for legislative bills related to bees and other pollinators. The bills are up for vote in the Legislature on April 29, 2014. Administrator Jovnes stated if Council approves the letters they Nvould be sent to the Legislature tomorrow morning. Hotvet moved, Sundberg seconded, authorizing the two letters of support for legislative bills related to bees and other pollinators be sent to Representative Cindy Pugh and Senator David Osmek. Councilmember Woodruff stated there are three bills. Bill SF2695 for the House of Representatives and HF2798 for the Senate are the same in text. Both bills refer to HF3172 a bill he does not support. It establishes a process to compensate the bee oN -,ners if their bees die because of pesticide poisoning. He expressed concern that the taxpayers Nvould end up reimbursing bee oN -,ners for Loss of bees. He could support endorsing SF2695 and HF2798 N ithout the language relating to HF3172. Councilmember Sundberg stated sometimes when there"are no negative impact ramifications to doing something harmful behaviors do not change. Therefore, she can support bill HF3172 evert though it may be in limbo. Motion passed 311 with Woodruff B. Consideration of Establishing a Four -Year Term for Mayor Mayor Zerby noted that the meeting packet contains a copy of a memorandum and ordinance amendment related to changing the term of mayor from a tv, o -v ear term to a four -year term. Administrator Joynes stated during the February 2014 Council and staff retreat there Nvas discussion about changing the ordinance that deals Nvith the term of the mayor. The copy of the ordinance amendment Nvould change the term to a four-year term and the effective date of the change has been left blank for Council to fill in. The'clange has to`be effective'after the next election. Councilmember Sundberg asked N-,-hat the'termkfor mayor is for the local communities. Administrator' JoN -nes explained the trend over the last decade has been to move to a four -year term. It is perceived as being onerous to run every two years. He thought an equal number of cases could be found on both sides. He has been involved Nvith a few cities that have made such as change to be consistent Nvith council member terms; , Councilmember Sundberg stated she supports the change. If a four -year term makes sense for a council member it should be the same for the mayor term. Councilmember Hotvet concurred. Councilmember Woodruff stated he supports the change and thought there should be discussion about the effective date. Mayor Zerby stated he supports the change. He noted that as a new Mayor he felt having to possibly run again Nvithout having two years of experience as Mayor did not make sense. He also noted it is a Nveak- mayor position; he gets one vote just like the other four members of Council. He stated in a community the size of Shorewood it is sometime difficult to get people to run for office. People may be more CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES April 14, 2014 Page 10 of 15 interested in running for the mayor seat if it were for a longer term. He recommended it be effective for the 2016 election for mayor. Councilmember Hotvet stated at the two -year point a new mayor is just getting settled in Councilmember Woodruff stated he could support that. Sundberg moved, Hotvet seconded, Approving ORDINANCE NO. 512, "An Ordinance Amending Chapter 106 of the Shorewood City Code Relating to Biennial Elections Effective with the 2016 Biennial Election." Motion passed 4/0. C. Purchasing Card Program Director DeJong noted that the meeting packet contains a copy of a City. He explained that City staff has not used credit cards or pure can be problematic for cities because the City would be extending' having to pay for interest. Per state statute a city is limited to only staff and Councilmembers have had to use their personal credit individually or for things like travel arrangements or online; praurar of different programs. Staff is recommending is a program supper through PFM Financial Services, LLC, an investment consulting frrn The recommended program allows the City to" place charge, where they are able to charge and the dollar cash advance capability. Staff intends to lock that d directly up front or by be placing restrictions on each c without having to know the answers to personal secut be reviewed centrally. The program provides for up to five active cards. Staff anticipates thaf each departmf ,., couple more available based on specific staff roles and and the department directors. posal for purchasing cards for the ing cards= in the past. Credit cards lit and it could potentially end up Ting interest on bonded. debt. City Is for purchases they have made gistration. Staff assessed a couple by the National League of Cities .ry strict limits on how much a card holder can mit on individual charges. The program offers a wn as' tight as possible either by eliminating it rd. The program allows for central administration y questions: Transactions on each individual can 100,000 in fraud protection provided the City has I director would get a card and there may be a cintingent on approval from Administrator Jovnes The drawback to the program is automatic withdrawal payment from the City's bank account for the full amount of the combined charges is required before the first Council meeting each month. The program is set up with a closing date of the 28"' of the month and the payment withdrawal is made within seven days of that. The latest withdrawal date would be the 7"' of the following month. In order to participate in the program staff would need an additional delegation of authority from Council for paying the bills. There is an existing delegation of authority for bond payments that must be made on a timely basis and for months when a Council meeting is cancelled and there is not time enough to get authorization to pay vendors within the 35 days mandated by state statute. DeJong noted staff recommends Council adopting the resolution related to the purchasing card program. Councilmember Sundberg asked what staff s recommendation is about oversight if Council delegates the additional authority. She stated she generally supports this but she does not want there to be months before it is determined that in error someone used the card inappropriately. Director DeJong explained it would be the same process as the one currently used. That is, all charges would be approved by the department director prior to payment. Per the resolution card holders would be required to turn in all of their charge receipts by the first of the month or the charges could become their personal liability. The receipts would be approved by the department director prior to the date the payment is due. Sundberg CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES April 14, 2014 Page 11 of 15 asked if Council would be presented with a list of the charges even though that would be after the fact. DeJong responded that would be done for the second Council meeting of the month. Councilmember Woodruff stated he shares Councilmember Sundberg's concern about the oversight. He suggested their needs to be a policy card holders acknowledge when they get a card which clearly states what the rules are. Maybe that could be a codicil to the personnel manual. Mayor Zerby noted that Director DeJong silently affirmed that with a nod of his head. Woodruff clarified that is not needed this evening but it needs to be approved by Council before cards are issued. Mayor Zerby stated he assumes approval of department director charges would be approved by the city administrator. Director DeJong confirmed that. Zerby then stated he assumes Council approves the city administrator's charges after the fact. Councilmember Woodruff stated that he would charge the finance director with challenging charges made by the administrator. Sundberg moved, Woodruff seconded, Adopting RESOLD' Delegating Authority for Paying Certain Claims and to Enter with PFM Financial Services, LLC" subject to developing a p which lays out the responsibilities associated with the use of a p on any card to staff and prohibiting the use of the cash advance In response to a question from Councilmember Hotvet, five department heads will be listed in the policy, Administrator Joynes stated there is a rebate rebate would be returned to the Citv. Counci_ $50,000 before it would get any rebate. Motion passed 4/0. 11. OLD 12. ST and 1. Monthly Bud2et'Reuort with 1 NO. 14 -0.29, "A Resolution the Purchasing Card Program that a card holder would sign asing card prior to the issuance Joynes explained the titles for the program based on usage. The the City would have to spend Mayor Zerby noted that via email Council received a copy of the March 2014 General Fund Monthly Budget Report. 2. Quarterly Investment Report Mayor Zerby noted the meeting packet contains a copy of the March 2014 Quarterly Investment Report. 3. Trail Projects Timeline Mayor Zerby noted that via email Council received a copy of the trails project timeline. 4. State Aid Funding Status Mayor Zerby noted that via email Council received a copy of the state aid funding status. CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES April 14, 2014 Page 12 of 15 Administrator Joynes stated he has asked Engineer Hornby to put out a memorandum about the Municipal State Aid (MSA) reimbursement and how Hornby determined the amount the City Nvas eligible to receive. The Citv had not been aware of money Hornbv identified that the Citv can use. Because some of the Councilmembers did not receive the email it Nvill be resent. Other Director BroN -,n stated that month to date there has been 6.27 inches of rain in the City according to the Chanhassen Weather Service. There has been 1.9 inches so far today. Staff has observed water ponding N-,-here it has not been observed before. There are ponding issues along the LRT'Trail and some of the storm sewer systems that back up to it. Staff is diligently working, to, resolve those issues. There are residents who are very concerned about the ponding in their v ards. Yet, many of those issues are private drainage issues. He noted the City does not have the authority to go on to private property and attempt to resolve those issues. He stated he had taken many calls today about the ponding and People did not like to hear that answer. Staff Neill continue to work on resolving issues. Councilmember Sundberg stated there a many properties ,along the Sn have ponding issues. She asked if the new sidewalk is contributing to th Director BroN -,n explained that for a project like the sidewalk project or to apply for a watershed district permit in best management praetic intended to help protect the environment. A city puts in catch basins for best management practices and then puts down one or two levels effectiveness of that structure. The intent for doing water bodies; that's a good thing, Unfortunately, th and ponding. That is what is happening along Smith wide on large construction projects. When significa because the ability to handle, the Nv ater has been red will face these t -,pes of issues N-,-hen it installs the construction projects. Road Nvost sidewalk that of the first things that is done is Ultimately best practices are cost of $2,000 — $3,000 to meet sf fabric which minimizes the is, to, minimize the silt that ultimately goes into is clogs up a ith silt which causes water backup Road. That is a common issue that occurs metro n falls there can be significant negative impacts because of the best practices. He noted the City fated erosion control measures as part of large Engineer Hotnby stated the plans for, the Galpin Lake Road trail/NyallcNya -,T are more than 50 percent complete; He noted that the next trail slated for construction in the capital improvement program is the Smithtown Road east sideN alk/trail project (from the LRT Trail to Country Club Road). He encouraged Council to call him if they have questions about the two projects. Councilmember Hotvet asked about the progress on the Excelsior Boulevard Trail segment (the section that extends from Manor Road, to Barrington Way). Engineer Hornby stated per Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES) it is his understanding that MCES Neill be working in that area mid to late June and MCES hopes to have its project completed by the end of the Near. Director DeJong explained the March 2014 Monthly Budget Report includes a $283,414 transfer out of Department 11 (Council) to the Park Improvement Fund per the direction of Council. That is a transfer of the net proceeds from the sale of the former City-- oN -,ned property located at 5795 Country Club Road. He noted the ice and snow removal expenses Near -to -date are very high because of the significant snowfall and the shortage of salt. He also stated Finance staff will be in training all week on the new utility billing system. CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES April 14, 2014 Page 13 of 15 Mayor Zerby asked when the auditors will be on site to conduct the 2013 financial audit. Director DeJong responded they will be on site starting Monday, May 5. Zerby asked if staff is ready for them. DeJong responded they are. Administrator Joynes noted there is a Council executive session scheduled for May 12 at 6:00 P.M. to talk about the Southshore Community Center. B. Mayor and City Council Councilmember Sundberg stated that over time issues are raised by residents or during Councilmembers' discussions that warrant some type of action. The chemical use issue discussed earlier in the meeting and the bee issue are examples. She asked staff to help Council keep track of them. She then stated a few months ago staff was directed to draft a simple request for proposal for services to help Council and staff assess potential alternative energy options for the City. That is another example. ,Councilmember Hotvet concurred with the request. Councilmember Woodruff stated he attended the Metro Cities annual meeting on April 25. University of Minnesota Extension climatologist and meteorologist.. Mark Seeley gave an interesting presentation about weather events and the increase in their frequency. Mr. Seeley noted that there is one city in Minnesota that had two 100 -year rain events in one year. During the meeting there was an election of officers and Minnetonka City Councilmember Brad Wiersum was elected president effective July 1. Woodruff then stated during Council's last meetih restrictions and scales. Mavor Zerbv stated he h Department ( SLMPD) Chief Litsey and Director Bro are old and they need to be certified annually. He thou few years. The SLMPD has concerns about how h( damage to roadways. They are also difficult to maneu He commented that if a t6o' l is easy to use it will likel offered the SLMPD the onbortunity to' have trucks N Woodruff asked that people Nyeight restrictions' 6rdinanec during its 2015 budget prlce was discussion about enforcement of weight oken with South Lake Minnetonka Police about that. Brown explained the existing scales the SLMPD has held off certifying them the last y the scales are and they can cause significant . It may be worthwhile to purchase lighter scales. le used more frequently. Brown noted that he has ;ht into the Public Works facilities for weighing. iey get an answer that the City can enforce its Coordinating Committee can discuss new scales Woodruff went on to state-that during Council's last meeting there was discussion about speed enforcement on Country Club Road. During that meeting it was pointed out that SLMPD police officers are reluctant to, issue speeding citation if a driver is traveling no more than five miles over the posted speed because a judge would not uphold such a written citation. The results of the speed study done on that roadway indicated there were a significant number of events where drivers traveled speeds much higher than the posted speed of 30 miles per hour (mph). Mayor Zerby noted that he has spoken with SLMPD Chief Litsev about speed concerns throughout the City. They are going to brainstorm on ideas and bring that back to the SLMPC Coordinating Committee and to Council. Councilmember Sundberg asked how to go about lowering the posted speed limit for Summit Avenue. Mayor Zerby stated speed limits can only be set by the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) and that is accomplished through a speed study. MnDOT uses the 85"' percentile, which is the speed that a reasonable prudent driver drives, to set the speed limits. Director Brown explained a city council must pass a resolution asking MnDOT to conduct a speed study then MnDOT will conduct the study. MnDOT believes that 85 percent of the motoring public use reasonable and prudent judgment to safely travel a roadway. Once MnDOT does a study and determines the 85 "' percentile it will set the CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES April 14, 2014 Page 14 of 15 posted speed based on the study data. The posted speed could possibly go up. Sundberg asked Council if that is something that should be considered for Summit Avenue. She stated it is hard to imagine prudent driver going 30 mph. Councilmember Woodruff stated he supports staff drafting a resolution requesting a speed study for Council's consideration during its next meeting. He noted that he does not think there is anv chance the speed limit Nvould be raised and that 30 mph is too high for that roadvmv. Councilmember Woodruff stated during the February 2014 Council and staff retreat there Nvas discussion about consolidated trash collection. Administrator Jovnes stated that discussion is scheduled for the fourth quarter of 2014. Councilmember Hotvet noted that on May 3 from 3:00 — 7:00 P.M. on the corner of Lake Street and Water Street the Lake Minnetonka Excelsior Rotary Club is putting on a, Bingo and Burgers by the Bay event. All proceeds Nvill go the Excelsior - Lake Minnetonka Chamber of Commerce's July 4 fireNvorks display. Mavor Zerbv stated he attended a SLMPD Coordinating Commite the meeting a change to the joint powers agreement (JPA) related Nvould change if from one member city not approving the budget to set the upcoming Tear's budget to the default provision in the JPA. The Committee also talked about succession planning for the SL leave the organization by the end of February 2015. The Conn Administrators/Manager to assess various organizational options in both police and fire Nvith two deputy chiefs reporting to that person. special meeting on April 15. During o budget approval was discussed. It yo cities not approving the budget to le noted he thinks that is a bad idea. [PD Chief who currently intends to ttee has directed the member City tiding the option of one person over Zerbv then stated that he and Councilmember Sundberg attended the Excelsior City Council Nvork session on April 21N-,-hen that Council discussed the Cove Proposal (a proposal about the Southshore Community Center). He thought the proposal was Nvell received. That Council was interested in moving fonyard Nvith the proposal to find out what Minnetonka Communitv Education's involvement Nvith the SSCC might be. Sundberg stated she was "encouraged by that Council's desire to Nyork Nvith the other joint owners of the SSCC. He also stated that oft April 22 he attended a forum hosted by the League of Women Voters South Tonka about livable 'communities, About '25 people attended the event. There Nvere two Hennepin County representatives present to discuss the +Countys pedestrian plan and bike plan study that the County is close to finishing. John Gunvot,, Chair of the Three Rivers Park District Board of Commissioners, Nvas also present and he did a very nice job: He noted the meeting has been televised and he encouraged people to Nvatch it. People Nvere updated on the County Road 19 bridge project at the intersection Nvith the LRT. He Nvent on to state that on April 25 he attended a Mayors of Lake Minnetonka meeting hosted by Hennepin County Commissioner Jan Callison. House Representative Cindy Pugh and Hennepin County Sherriff Rich Stanek Nvere also present. There Nvas an update on the scenic b«v y initiative. Most of the Mayors present Nvere supportive of it. A couple Mayors expressed concerns about the traffic that could be generated because of the initiative. Those in attendance could not recall there being a death from a boating drovrang incident on Lake Minnetonka in 2013. CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES April 14, 2014 Page 15 of 15 13. ADJOURN Woodruff moved, Sundberg seconded, Adjourning the City Council Regular Meeting of April 28, 2014, at 8:43 P.M. Motion passed 510. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED Christine Freeman, Recorder ATTEST: Jear Scott Zerby, Title/ Subject: Verified Claims Meeting Date: May lZ,2OI4 Prepared by: Michelle Nguyen, Senior Accountant Bruce DeJong, Finance Director Attachments: Claims lists Policy Consideration: Should the attached claims against the City of Shorewood bepaid? Background: Claims for council authorization. 60334-60335 & ACH 21,614.75 Pending Checks & ACH 115,035.71 Total Claims $136,650.46 We have also included a payroll summary for the payroll period ending May 3, 2014. Financial or Budget Considerations: These expenditures are reasonable and necessary to provide services to our residents and funds are budgeted and available for these purposes. Options: The City Council is may accept the staff recommendation to pay these claims or may reject any expenditure b deems not in the best interest of the city. Recommendation / Action Requested: Staff recommends approval of the claims list as presented. Next Steps and Timelines: Checks will be distributed following approval. Accounts Payable Check Detail User: mnguyen Printed: 05/08/2014 - 1:49PM Check Number Check Date Amount 5 - EFTPS - FEDERAL W/H Line Item Account 0 05/05/2014 Inv PR Batch 00001.05.2014 Medicare Employer 10,508.97 0 Total: 10,508.97 5 - EFTPS - FEDERAL W/H Total: 10,508.97 2 - ICMA RETIREMENT RUST-302131-457 Line Item Account 60334 05/05/2014 Inv PR Batch 00001.05.2014 Deferred Comp Fla 1,625.00 60334 Total: 1,625.00 2 - ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST-302131-457 Total: 1,625.00 11 - MN DEPT OF REVENUE Line Item Account 0 05/05/2014 Inv PR Batch 00001.05.2014 State Income Tax 1,746.63 0 Total: 1,746.63 11- MN DEPT OF REVENUE Total: 1,746.63 9 - PERA Line Item Account 0 05/05/2014 Inv PR Batch 00001.05.2014 MN PERA Benefit E 6,146.10 0 Total: 6,146.10 9 - PERA Total: 6,146.10 332 - PETTY CASH Line Item Account 60335 05/05/2014 Inv 2014 - Cleanup Cash Change for Cleanup Day 300.00 60335 Total: 300.00 332 - PETTY CASH Total: 300.00 1 - WELLS FARGO HEALTH BENEFIT SVCS Line Item Account AP-Check Detail (5/8/2014 - 1:49 PM) Page 1 Check Number Check Date Amount 0 05/05/2014 Inv PR Batch 00001.05.2014 HealthSavingsAc 1,288.05 0 Total: 1,288.05 1 - WELLS FARGO HEALTH BENEFIT SVCS Total: 1,288.05 Total: 21,614.75 AP-Check Detail (5/8/2014 - 1:49 PM) Page 2 Payroll G/L Distribution Report User: mnguyen Batch: 00001.05.2014 - PR05052014 CITY OF SHOREWOOD Account Number Debit Amount Credit Amount Description FUND 101 General Fund DEPT 00 Non - Departmental 101 -00 -1010 -0000 0.00 41,564.40 CASH AND INVESTMENTS DEPT Total: 0.00 41,564.40 DEPT 13 Administraton 101 -13- 4101 -0000 7,719.38 0.00 FULL -TIME REGULAR 101 -13- 4121 -0000 489.29 0.00 PERA CONTRIB - CITY SHARE 101 -13 -4122 -0000 524.50 0.00 FICA CONTRIB - CITY SHARE 101 -13- 4151 -0000 24.28 0.00 WORKERS COMPENSATION DEPT Total: 8,757.45 0.00 DEPT 15 Finance 101 -15- 4101 -0000 4,646.68 0.00 FULL-TIME REGULAR 101 -15- 4121 -0000 306.24 0.00 PERA CONTRIB - CITY SHARE 101 -15- 4122 -0000 308.76 0.00 FICA CONTRIB - CITY SHARE 101 -15- 4151 -0000 13.88 0.00 WORKERS COMPENSATION DEPT Total: 5,275.56 0.00 DEPT 18 Planning 101 -18- 4101 -0000 6,109.35 0.00 FULL -TIME, REGULAR 101 -18- 4121 -0000 381.10 0.00 PERA CONTRIB - CITY SHARE 101 -18- 4122 -0000 373.47 0.00 FICA CONTRIB - CITY SHARE 101 -18- 4151 -0000 15.97 0.00 WORKERS COMPENSATION DEPT Total: 6,879.89 0.00 DEPT 24 Protective Inspections 101 -24- 4101 -0000 4,058.77 0.00 FULL -TIME REGULAR 101 -24- 4121 -0000 261.64 0.00 PERA CONTRIB - CITY SHARE 101 -24- 4122 -0000 232.59 0.00 FICA CONTRIB - CITY SHARE 101 -24- 4151 -0000 21.80 0.00 WORKERS COMPENSATION DEPT Total: 4,574.80 0.00 DEPT 32 Public Works Service PR - G/L Distribution Report (05/05/2014 - 12:09 PM) Page 1 Account Number Debit Amount Credit Amount Description 101 -32- 4101 -0000 10,032.61 0.00 FULL -TIME REGULAR 101 -32- 4102 -0000 177.02 0.00 OVERTIME 101 -32- 4105 -0000 232.70 0.00 STREET PAGER PAY 101 -32- 4121- 0000 648.74 0.00 PERA CONTRIB - CITY SHARE 101 -32 -4122 -0000 657.67 0.00 FICA CONTRIB - CITY SHARE 101 -32- 4151 -0000 477.44 0.00 WORKERS COMPENSATION DEPT Total: 12,226.18 0.00 DEPT 52 Park Maintenance 1,826.30 101 -52 -4101 -0000 2,654.29 0.00 FULL -TIME REGULAR 101 -52- 4121 -0000 140.49 0.00 PERA CONTRIB - CITY SHARE 101 -52- 4122 -0000 168.85 0.00 FICA CONTRIB - CITY SHARE 101 -52- 4151 -0000 125.55 0.00 WORKERS COMPENSATION DEPT Total: 3,089.18 0.00 DEPT 53 Recreation 101 -53 -41.01 -0000 655.89 0.00 FULL -TIME REGULAR 1.01 -53- 4103 -0000 9.00 0.00 PART -TIME, 101 -53- 4121 -0000 46.27 0.00 PERA CONTRIB - CITY SHARE 101 -53 -4122 -0000 49.81 0.00 FICA CONTRIB - CITY SHARE 1.01 -53- 4151 -0000 0.37 0.00 WORKERS COMPENSATION DEPT Total: 761.34 0.00 FUND Total: 41,564.40 41,564.40 FUND 201 Southshore Center DEPT 00 Non - Departmental 201 -00- 1010 -0000 0.00 1,826.30 CASH AND INVESTMENTS 201 -00- 4101 -0000 1,251.90 0.00 FULL -TIME REGULAR 201 -00- 4103 -0000 367.50 0.00 PART -TIME 201 -00- 4121 -0000 90.77 0.00 PERA CONTRIB - CITY SHARE 201 -00- 4122 -0000 115.83 0.00 FICA CONTRIB - CITY SHARE 201 -00- 4151 -0000 0.30 0.00 WORKERS COMPENSATION DEPT Total. 1,826.30 1,826.30 FUND Total: 1,826.30 1,826.30 PR - G/L Distribution Report (05/05/2014 - 12:09 PM) Page 2 Account Number Debit Amount Credit Amount Description 601 -00- 4102 -0000 601 -00- 4121 -0000 601 -00- 4122 -0000 601 -00- 4151 -0000 DEPT Total: FUND Total: FUND 611 DEPT 00 611 -00 -1010 -0000 611 -00 -4101 -0000 611 -00- 4102 -0000 611 -00- 4121 -0000 611 -00- 4122 -0000 611 -00- 4151 -0000 DEPT Total: FUND Total: FUND 621 DEPT 00 621 -00- 1010 -0000 621 -00 -4101 -0000 621 -00- 4121 -0000 621 -00- 4122 -0000 DEPT Total: FUND Total: FUND 631 DEPT 00 410.61 382.91 363.14 1.07.90 6,907.72 6,907.72 Sanitary Sewer Utility Non - Departmental 0.00 4,735.18 453.21 320.17 315.90 80.22 5,904.68 5,904.68 Recycling Utility Non - Departmental 0.00 556.68 37.39 37.02 631.09 631.09 Storm Water Utility Non - Departmental 0.00 OVERTIME 0.00 PERA CONTRIB - CITY SHARE 0.00 FICA CONTRIB - CITY SHARE 0.00 WORKERS COMPENSATION 6,907.72 6,907.72 5,904.68 CASH AND INVESTMENTS 0.00 FULL -TIME REGULAR 0.00 OVERTIME 0.00 PERA CONTRIB - CITY SHARE 0.00 FICA CONTRIB - CITY SHARE 0.00 WORKERS COMPENSATION 5,904.68 177.91 5,904.68 FICA CONTRIB - CITY SHARE 631.09 CASH AND INVESTMENTS 0.00 FULL -TIME REGULAR 0.00 PERA CONTRIB - CITY SHARE 0.00 FICA CONTRIB - CITY SHARE 631.09 631.09 631 -00- 1010 -0000 0.00 3,248.02 CASH AND INVESTMENTS 631 -00- 4101 -0000 2,777.77 0.00 FULL -TIME REGULAR 631 -00- 4121 -0000 195.66 0.00 PERA CONTRIB - CITY SHARE 631 -00 -4122 -0000 177.91 0.00 FICA CONTRIB - CITY SHARE 631 -00- 4151 -0000 96.68 0.00 WORKERS COMPENSATION DEPT Total: 3,248.02 3,248.02 FUND Total: 3,248.02 3,248.02 PR - G/L Distribution Report (05/05/2014 - 12:09 PM) Page 3 Account Number Debit Amount Credit Amount Description FUND 700 Payroll Clearing Fund DEPT 00 Non - Departmental 700 -00 -1010 -0000 59,893.82 0.00 CASH AND INVESTMENTS 700 -00- 2170 -0000 0.00 29,552.75 GROSS PAYROLL CLEARING 700 -00- 2171 -0000 0.00 6,396.05 HEALTH INSURANCE PAYABLE 700 -00- 2172 -0000 0.00 3,858.07 FEDERAL WITHHOLDING PAYABLE 700 -00- 2173 -0000 0.00 1,746.63 STATE WITHHOLDING PAYABLE 700 -00- 21.74 -0000 0.00 6,650.90 FICA /MEDICARE TAX PAYABLE 700 -00 -2175 -0000 0.00 6,146.10 PERA WITHHOLDING PAYABLE 700 -00- 2176 -0000 0.00 1,625.00 DEFERRED COMPENSATION 700 -00 -2177 -0000 0.00 964.39 WORKERS COMPENSATION 700 -00- 2179 -0000 0.00 192.00 SEC 1.25 DEP CARE REIMB PAYABLE 700 -00- 2180 -0000 0.00 406.73 LIFE INSURANCE 700 -00 -2181 -0000 0.00 754.83 DISABILITY INSURANCE 700 -00 -2182 -0000 0.00 31.2.32 UNION DUES 700 -00 -2183 -0000 0.00 1,288.05 HEALTH SAVINGS ACCOUNT DEPT Total: 59,893.82 59,893.82 FUND Total: 59,893.82 59,893.82 Report Total: 119,976.03 1.1.9,976.03 PR - G/L Distribution Report (05/05/2014 - 12:09 PM) Page 4 Accounts Payable Computer Check Proof List by Vendor User: mnguyen Printed: 05/08/2014 - 1:01PM Batch: 00002.05.2014 - COUNCIL - 05122014 City of Shorewood Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Fund Dept Vendor: 118 APPLIED MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES Check Sequence: I Fund Dept 96399606 Cleanes & Supplies 307.96 05/12/2014 101-32-4245-0000 General Pub Works Check Total: 30796 Vendor: 469 BAILEY NURSERIES, INC. Check Sequence: 2 Fund Dept INV0403992 Trees 4,403.50 05/12/2014101 -53- 4246 -0000 General Recreation Check Total: 4,403.50 Vendor: 465 LORI &WILLIAM BARON Check Sequence: 3 Fund Dept 10-863004-98 6110 Tee Trail-Utility Refund-2014 Certified to Sei 530.62 05/12/2014 611-00-3710-0000 Sewer Non-Dept Check Total: 530.62 Vendor: 458 BRETT BAUMANN Check Sequence: 4 Fund Dept 2014-Cloth 2014 Cloth 125.00 05/12/2014 101-32-4245-0000 General Pub Works Check Total: 125.00 Vendor: 131 BUDGET PRINTING AND AWARDS Check Sequence: 5 Fund Dept 4916 Name Plate-Jeffrey Ische-Park Commissioner 16.69 05/12/2014 101-11-4245-0000 General Council Check Total: 16.69 Vendor: 134 CARQUEST AUTO PARTS Check Sequence: 6 Fund Dept 6974-225000 Circuit Breaker 5.49 05/12/2014 101-32-4221-0000 General Pub Works Check Total: 5.49 Accounts Payable Computer Check Proof List by Vendor User: mnguyen Printed: 05/08/2014 - 1:01PM Batch: 00002.05.2014 - COUNCIL-05122014 City of ,Shorewood Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Fund Dept Vendor: 136 CENTERPOINT ENERGY Check Sequence: 7 Fund Dept 04302014 5755 Country Club Rd - 03/20 -04/18 264.52 05/12/2014 101 -19- 4380 -0000 General Mun Bldg 04302014 5745 Ctry Club & 25200 Hwy 7- 03/20 -04/18 313.00 05/12/2014 101 -52- 4380 -0000 General Park Maint 04302014 24200 Smithtown Rd - 03/20 -04/18 681.84 05/12/2014 101 -32 -4380 -0000 General Pub Works 04302014 20405 Knighsbridge Rd - 03/20 -04/18 106.85 05/12/2014 601 -00- 4394 -0000 Water Non -Dept 04302014 28125 Boulder Bridge - 03/20 -04/18 230.04 05/12/2014 601 -00- 4396 -0000 Water Non -Dept 79456885 - 042414 5735 Country Club Rd - 03/21 -04/22 265.51 05/12/2014 201 -00- 4380 -0000 SSC Non -Dept 86501806- 042414 20630 Manor Rd - 03/21 -04/22 62.28 05/12/2014 101 -52- 4380 -0000 General Park Maint Check Total: 1,924.04 Vendor: 137 CENTURY LINK Check Sequence: 8 Fund Dept 9524702294 -AP14 952- 470 - 2294 -PW 59.57 05/12/2014 101 -32- 4321 -0000 General Pub Works 9524706340 -AP14 952- 474 - 6340 -CH 123.09 05/12/2014 101 -19- 4321 -0000 General Mun Bldg 9524709605 -AP14 952- 474 - 9605- Amesbury 75.09 05/12/2014 601 -00- 4394 -0000 Water Non -Dept 9524709606 -AP14 952- 474 - 9606- Amesbury 75.09 05/12/2014 601 -00 -4394 -0000 Water Non -Dept Check Total: 332.84 Vendor: 143 CITY OF CHANHASSEN Check Sequence: 9 Fund Dept 04302014 018505 -000 - ist Qtr 9.72 05/12/2014 601 -00- 4263 -0000 Water Non -Dept 04302014 018505 -001 - 1st Qtr 1,704.60 05/12/2014 601 -00- 4263 -0000 Water Non -Dept Check Total: 1,714.32 Vendor: 159 CULLIGAN BOTTLED WATER Check Sequence: 10 Fund Dept April -2014 Drinking Water - April 14.27 05/12/2014 101 -19 -4245 -0000 General Mun Bldg Check Total: 14.27 Vendor: 167 ECM PUBLISHERS INC Check Sequence: 1 I Fund Dept 95555 Planning - 40814 Sunnyvale Lane 73.62 05/12/2014 101 -18- 4351 -0000 General Planning Check Total: 73.62 Accounts Payable Computer Check Proof List by Vendor User: mnguyen Printed: 05/08/2014 - 1:01PM Batch: 00002.05.2014 - COUNCIL- 05122014 Invoice No Description Vendor: 171 ELECTRICAL INSTALLATION & MAINT. CO 0012857 -IN Signal Maint 0012863 -IN Relamp & Ballast Work Pub Works Check Total: Vendor: 219 ELLY PIEPER 04232014 Tablecloths -04/24 2,909.68 Check Total: Vendor: 184 GREGORY FASCHING 2014 -Cloth 2014 -Cloth Check Total: Vendor: 188 FLEETPRIDE TRUCK & TRAILER PARTS 60913083 Brake Parts 05/12/2014 201 -00- 4400 -0000 Check Total: Vendor: 192 G & K SERVICES April -2014 C.H. -April Svc April -2014 P.W. April Svc April -2014 SSCC -April Svc Check Sequence: 14 Check Total: Vendor: 200 GOPHER STATE ONE CALL 103448 Apr Svc 103448 Apr Svc 103448 Apr Svc Check Total: ir City of Shorewood Amount Payment Date Acct Number Fund Dept Check Sequence: 12 Fund Dept 909.68 05/12/2014 101 -32- 4400 -0000 General Pub Works 2,000.00 05/12/2014 201 -00- 4400 -0000 SSC Non -Dept 2,909.68 Check Sequence: 13 Fund Dept 24.00 05/12/2014 201 -00- 4400 -0000 SSC Non -Dept 24.00 Check Sequence: 14 Fund Dept 125.00 05/12/2014 101 -32- 4245 -0000 General Pub Works 125.00 Check Sequence: 15 Fund Dept 93.12 05/12/2014 101 -32- 4221 -0000 General Pub Works 93.12 Check Sequence: 16 Fund Dept 101.22 05/12/2014 101 -19- 4400 -0000 General Mun Bldg 906.92 05/12/2014 101 -32- 4400 -0000 General Pub Works 46.36 05/12/2014 201 -00- 4400 -0000 SSC Non -Dept 1,054.50 Check Sequence: 17 Fund Dept 66.27 05/12/2014 611 -00- 4400 -0000 Sewer Non -Dept 66.28 05/12/2014 601 -00- 4400 -0000 Water Non -Dept 66.30 05/12/2014 631 -00- 4400 -0000 Storm Water Non -Dept 198.85 Accounts Payable Computer Check Proof List by Vendor User: mnguyen Printed: 05/08/2014 - 1:01PM Batch: 00002.05.2014 - COUNCIL-05122014 Invoice No Description Vendor: 417 ROBERT HANSON 2014-Cloth 2014-Cloth 05/12/2014 101-32-4245-0000 Check Total: Vendor: 211 HAWKINS INC 3588132-RI Chlorine Check Total: Vendor: 212 HD SUPPLY WATERWORKS, LTD. C290452 Water Repair Parts Dept Check Total: Vendor: 223 INFINITY FIRE PROTECTION 4245 Fire Suppression Sprinkler System Inspection 4246 Sprinkler System Inspection 4246 Sprinkler System Inspection 4246 Sprinkler System Inspection Check Total: Vendor: 224 INFRATECH PR140202 Grout Leak in Mainhole-4845 Enchanted Ln 05/12/2014 601-00-4221-0000 Check Total: Vendor: 468 INTERSTATE ALL BATTERY CENTER 1933 Batteries Check Total: Mw9zCity of Shorewood Amount Payment Date Acct Number Fund Dept Check Sequence: 18 Fund Dept 125.00 05/12/2014 101-32-4245-0000 General Pub Works 125.00 Check Sequence: 19 Fund Dept 105.00 05/12/2014 601-00-4245-0000 Water Non-Dept 105.00 Check Sequence: 20 Fund Dept 49.15 05/12/2014 601-00-4221-0000 Water Non-Dept 49.15 Check Sequence: 21 Fund Dept 1,081.45 05/12/2014 201-00-4400-0000 SSC Non-Dept 141.66 05/12/2014 101-19-4400-0000 General Mun Bldg 141.67 05/12/2014 101-32-4400-0000 General Pub Works 141.67 05/12/2014 201-00-4400-0000 SSC Non-Dept 1,506.45 Check Sequence: 22 Fund Dept 1,156.50 05/12/2014 611-00-4400-0000 Sewer Non-Dept 1,156.50 Check Sequence: 23 Fund Dept 113.70 05/12/2014 611-00-4245-0000 Sewer Non-Dept 113.70 Accounts Payable Computer Check Proof List by Vendor User: mnguyen Printed: 05/08/2014 - 1:01PM Batch: 00002.05.2014 - COUNCIL- 05122014 Invoice No Description Vendor: 234 JOHN DEERE LANDSCAPES 67927046 Quick Cover Seed Mix 05/12/2014 101 -32- 4250 -0000 Check Total: Vendor: 455 KDV, LTD 197586 April Consulting Svc Check Total: Vendor: 240 KENNETH N POTTS PA April -2014 Prosectution Svc - April Dept Check Total: Vendor: 467 KREMER SERVICES, LLC 31036 Springs Dump Truck 2,660.00 Check Total: Vendor: 259 CLARE T LINK 2014 -13 Park Commission Meeting - May07 Check Total: Vendor: 260 LOCATORS & SUPPLIES, INC. 0222506 -IN Safety Equipment & Gear 05/12/2014 101 -16- 4304 -0000 Check Total: Vendor: 263 JOSEPH LUGOWSKI 2014 -Cloth 2014 -Cloth Check Total: City of Shorewood Amount Payment Date Acct Number Fund Dept Check Sequence: 24 Fund Dept 213.76 05/12/2014 101 -32- 4250 -0000 General Pub Works 213.76 Check Sequence: 25 Fund Dept 2,660.00 05/12/2014101 -15- 4301 -0000 General Fin 2,660.00 Check Sequence: 26 Fund Dept 2,500.00 05/12/2014 101 -16- 4304 -0000 General Prof Svcs 2,500.00 Check Sequence: 27 Fund Dept 595.96 05/12/2014 101 -32- 4221 -0000 General Pub Works 595.96 Check Sequence: 28 Fund Dept 187.00 05/12/2014 101 -52- 4400 -0000 General Park Maint 187.00 Check Sequence: 29 Fund Dept 277.61 05/12/2014 101 -32- 4245 -0000 General Pub Works 277.61 Check Sequence: 30 Fund Dept 125.00 05/12/2014 101 -32 -4245 -0000 General Pub Works 125.00 Accounts Payable Computer Check Proof List by Vendor User: mnguyen Printed: 05/08/2014 - 1:01PM Batch: 00002.05.2014 - COUNCIL-05122014 Invoice No Description Vendor: 264 M/A ASSOCIATES INC 6967 Garbage Bags 05/12/2014 101-52-4245-0000 Check Total: Vendor: 470 BRADLEY MASON 2014-Cloth 2014-Cloth Check Total: Vendor: 466 MCFOA TREASURER 2014-Grout 2014 Membership - Twila Grout 2014-Panchyshyn 2014 Membership - Jean Panchyshyn 125.00 Check Total: Vendor: 285 MIDWEST GOVERNMENT ADVISOR April-2014 Admin Svc - April Check Total: Vendor: 287 MIDWEST OVERHEAD CRANE CORP 79323 Annual Crane Inspection Fund Check Total: Vendor: 456 MINNESOTA PIPE & EQUIP 0312756 Watermain Parts 0313269 Watermain Parts 0313272 Watermain Parts General Check Total: Vendor: 313 MICHELLE NGUYEN April-2014 Mileage - Apr Check Total: �69MZ) P City of Shorewood Amount Payment Date Acct Number Fund Dept Check Sequence: 31 Fund Dept 463.08 05/12/2014 101-52-4245-0000 General Park Maint 463.08 Check Sequence: 32 Fund Dept 125.00 05/12/2014 101-32-4245-0000 General Pub Works 125.00 Check Sequence: 33 Fund Dept 35.00 05/12/2014101 -13- 4331 -0000 General Admin 35.00 05/12/2014101 -13- 4331 -0000 General Admin 70.00 Check Sequence: 34 Fund Dept 9,300.00 05/12/2014 101-13-4400-0000 General Admin 9,300.00 Check Sequence: 35 Fund Dept 640.82 05/12/2014 101-32-4400-0000 General Pub Works 640.82 Check Sequence: 36 Fund Dept 223.44 05/12/2014 601-00-4221-0000 Water Non-Dept 54.72 05/12/2014 601-00-4221-0000 Water Non-Dept 70.68 05/12/2014 601-00-4221-0000 Water Non-Dept 348.84 Check Sequence: 37 Fund Dept 98.56 05/12/20141.01 -15- 4331 -0000 General Fin 98.56 Accounts Payable Computer Check Proof List by Vendor User: mnguyen Printed: 05/08/2014 - 1:01PM Batch: 00002.05.2014 - COUNCIL - 05122014 Invoice No Description Vendor: 320 NORTHLAND SECURITIES INC 2008A -EDA -2014 2008A -EDA -BONDS General Check Total: Vendor: 325 ON SITE SANITATION INC A- 535257 Badger Park- 04/26 -05/23 A- 535258 Cathcart Park- 04/26 -05/23 A- 535259 Freeman Park- 04/26 -05/23 A- 535260 Silverwood Park- 04/26 -05/23 A- 535261 South Shore Skate- 04/26 -05/23 A- 535262 Christmas Lk Boat Access - 04/26 -05/23 Check Total: Vendor: 329 JEAN PANCHYSITYN Spring -2014 Spring -2014 Tuition Reimbursement Check Total: Vendor: 334 CHRIS POUNDER 2014 -Cloth 2014 -Cloth Check Total: Vendor: 341 DANIEL RANDALL 2014 -Cloth 2014 -Cloth Check Total: Vendor: 108 REPUBLIC SERVICES No.894 0894 - 003475584 Recycling Svc - May Check Total: Vendor: 345 SAFEASSURE CONSULTANTS 720 Safety Training Check Total: Amount Payment Date Acct Number Check Sequence: 38 24,287.50 05/12/2014 310 -00- 4711 -0000 24,287.50 50.00 50.00 150.00 50.00 50.00 220.00 570.00 2,515.73 2,5 15.73 125.00 125.00 125.00 125.00 13,741.20 13,741.20 2,958.00 2,958.00 Check Sequence: 39 05/12/2014 101 -52- 4410 -0000 05/12/2014 101 -52- 4410 -0000 05/12/2014 101 -52- 4410 -0000 05/12/2014 101 -52- 4410 -0000 05/12/2014 101 -52- 4410 -0000 05/12/2014 101 -52- 4410 -0000 Check Sequence: 40 05/12/2014 101 -13- 4331 -0000 Check Sequence: 41 05/12/2014 101 -32 -4245 -0000 Check Sequence: 42 05/12/2014 101 -32 -4245 -0000 Check Sequence: 43 05/12/2014 621 -00- 4400 -0000 Check Sequence: 44 05/12/2014 101 -32- 4400 -0000 City of Shorewood Fund Dept Fund Dept City Hall Non -Dept Bonds Dept Fund Dept General Park Maint General Park Maint General Park Maint General Park Maint General Park Maint General Park Maint Fund Dept General Admin Fund Dept General Pub Works Fund Dept General Pub Works Fund Dept Recycling Non -Dept Fund Dept General Pub Works Accounts Payable Computer Check Proof List by Vendor User: Dept mnguyen Printed: General 05/08/2014 - 1:01PM Batch: Mun Bldg 00002.05.2014 - COUNCIL - 05122014 Invoice No Description Vendor: 347 SAM'S CLUB 006799 P.W. Exp 006799 C.H. Exp Check Total: Vendor: 354 SHOREWOOD TRUE VALUE 119107 Mailbox & Letters & Numbers 119132 Hardware - Water Tower 119142 Lights for Water Tower 119161 Bolts -Nuts Supplies 119377 Caution Tape Check Total: Vendor: 364 SPRINGBROOK SOFTWARE INC 1078 2nd Payment for 25% Service Check Total: Vendor: 366 BRUCE STARK 2014 -Cloth 2014 -Cloth Check Total: Vendor: 368 STONESCAPES 3759 Garden Maint. - April Svc Check Total: Vendor: 374 THE DALE GREEN COMPANY 2739 Pul Mix Check Total: 283.70 City of �WgShorewood Amount Payment Date Acct Number Check Sequence: 45 199.76 05/12/2014 101 -32- 4245 -0000 83.94 05/12/2014 101 -19- 4245 -0000 60.88 45.90 32.92 31.89 23.98 195.57 17,250.00 17,250.00 125.00 125.00 210.00 210.00 882.00 882.00 Check Sequence: 46 05/12/2014 101 -32- 4245 -0000 05/12/2014 601 -00- 4245 -0000 05/12/2014 601 -00- 4245 -0000 05/12/2014 101 -32- 4245 -0000 05/12/2014 101 -32- 4245 -0000 Check Sequence: 47 05/12/2014 403 -00- 4640 -0004 Check Sequence: 48 05/12/2014 1.01 -32- 4245 -0000 Check Sequence: 49 05/12/2014 101 -19- 4223 -0000 Check Sequence: 50 05/12/2014 101 -32- 4250 -0000 Fund Dept Fund Dept General Pub Works General Mun Bldg Fund Dept General Pub Works Water Non -Dept Water Non -Dept General Pub Works General Pub Works Fund Dept Equip Repl Non -Dept Fund Dept General Pub Works Fund Dept General Mun Bldg Fund Dept General Pub Works Accounts Payable Computer Check Proof List by Vendor User: mnguyen Printed: 05/08/2014 - 1:01PM Batch: 00002.05.2014 - COUNCIL - 05122014 F, ZZ4 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Fund Dept Vendor: 384 TOTAL PRINTING SERVICES Check Sequence: 51 Fund Dept 9835 Newsletters - May Svc 663.50 05/12/2014 101-13-4400-0000 General Admin 9835 SSCC Insert - May 237.00 05/12/2014 201-00-4400-0000 SSC Non-Dept 9835 Spring Cleanup Insert - May 132.00 05/12/2014 621-00-4400-0000 Recycling Non-Dept Check Total: 1,032.50 Vendor: 421 VERIZON WIRELESS Check Sequence: 52 Fund Dept 9723950042 L.S. Phones - 03/22-04/21 217.14 05/12/2014 611-00-4321-0000 Sewer Non-Dept Check Total: 217.14 Vendor: 398 VOYAGER FLEET SYSTEMS INC Check Sequence: 53 Fund Dept 869293803417 Closing Date 04/24/14 1,852.95 05/12/2014 101-32-4212-0000 General Pub Works Check Total: 1,85295 Vendor: 401 WASTE MANAGEMENT OF WI-MN Check Sequence: 54 Fund Dept 6646717-1593-9 5735 Country Club Rd - May Svc 192.32 05/12/2014 201-00-4400-0000 SSC Non-Dept 6646718-1593-7 24200 Smithtown Rd -May svc 450.12 05/12/2014 101-32-4400-0000 General Pub Works Check Total: 64144 Vendor: 327 WINDSTREAM Check Sequence: 55 Fund Dept 57289585 Parks Service03/29-04/28 159.86 05/12/2014 101-52-4321-0000 General Park Maint 57289585 PW Service03/29-04/28 51.52 05/12/2014 101-32-4321-0000 General Pub Works 57289585 CH Service - 03/29-04/28 115.18 05/12/2014 101-19-4321-0000 General Mun Bldg 57289585 Badger Well Service03/29-04/28 110.01 05/12/2014 601-00-4395-0000 Water Non-Dept 57289585 Boulder Bridge Well Svc03/29-04/28 54.17 05/12/2014 601-00-4396-0000 Water Non-Dept 57289585 West Water Tower Service03/29-04/28 54.17 05/12/2014 601-00-4321-0000 Water Non-Dept Check Total: 544.91 Accounts Payable Computer Check Proof List by Vendor User: mnguyen Printed: 05/08/2014 - I:01PM Batch: 00002.052014 - COUNCIL - 05122014 Invoice No Description Vendor: 411 XCEL ENERGY Stmt #409522824 Boulder Bridge Svc - 02/24 -03/30 Stmt #409522824 S.E. Area Svc - 02/24 -03/30 Stmt #409522824 Amesbury Svc - 02/24 -03/30 Stmt #409522824 Street Lights - 02/24 -03/30 Stmt #409522824 C.H. Svcs - 02/24 -03/30 Stmt #409522824 P.W. Bldg Svc - 02/24 -03/30 Stmt #409522824 P.W. Street Lights Svc - 02/24 -03/30 Stmt#409522824 Parks - 02/24 -03/30 Stmt#410239448 24253 Smithtown Rd - 03/25 -04/23 Stmt#410254872 5735 Country Club Rd - 03/25 -04/23 Stmt#410567179 5700 County Rd 19 - 03/30 -04/28 Stmt#410567179 5700 County Rd 19 - Unit Light - 03/30 -04/28 General Check Total: 11,728.69 Vendor: 412 ZARNOTH BRUSH WORKS INC 0145993 -IN Credit- Brooms Sweeper 0149092 -IN Credit- Brooms Sweeper General Check Total: 524.21 Vendor: 413 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE 54075825 First Aid Supplies Check Total: 63.45 Total for Check Run: 114,389.92 Total of Number of Checks: 58 City of Shorewood Amount Payment Date Acct Number Fund Dept Check Sequence: 56 Fund Dept 615.41 05/12/2014 601 -00- 4396 -0000 Water Non -Dept 2,785.51 05/12/2014 601 -00- 4398 -0000 Water Non -Dept 490.17 05/12/2014 601 -00- 4394 -0000 Water Non -Dept 591.67 05/12/2014 611 -00- 4380 -0000 Sewer Non -Dept 619.17 05/12/2014 101 -1.9- 4380 -0000 General Mun Bldg 547.98 05/12/2014 101 -32- 4380 -0000 General Pub Works 3,501.67 05/12/2014 101 -32- 4399 -0000 General Pub Works 713.35 05/12/2014 101 -52- 4380 -0000 General Park Maint 952.93 05/12/2014 601 -00 -4395 -0000 Water Non -Dept 667.85 05/12/2014 201 -00- 4380 -0000 SSC Non -Dept 34.84 05/12/2014 101 -32- 4399 -0000 General Pub Works 208.14 05/12/2014 101 -32- 4399 -0000 General Pub Works Check Sequence: 57 Fund Dept - 645.79 05/12/2014 101 -32- 4250 -0000 General Pub Works 1,170.00 05/12/2014 101 -32- 4250 -0000 General Pub Works Check Sequence: 58 Fund Dept 63.45 05/12/2014 101 -52- 4245 -0000 General Park Maint #3B MEETING TYPE City of Shorewood Council Meeting Item Regular Meeting Title / Subject: Approve Transfer of Funds to Close Deficits Meeting Date: 5/12/14 Prepared by: Bruce DeJong, Finance Director Reviewed by: Bill Joynes, City Administrator Attachment: Resolution Policy Consideration: Should the City Council transfer cash to cover deficits in the Southshore Center Fund and Trail Construction Fund? Background: After the 2012 audit was completed, Council authorized transfers to close deficits that existed at the end of 2012 for two funds - the Southshore Center Fund (- $40,749) and Trail Construction Fund (- $34,576). As staff works through the 2013 audit, we have identified that further deficits exist in those funds due to an excess of expenditures over revenues. The Southshore Center Fund needs a total of $44,000 and the Trail Construction Fund needs a total of $174,000. Council has been aware that additional cash resources in both of these funds were likely and the auditor recommends that a solution to cover those deficits needs to be identified for year end. The deficits were covered temporarily through the use of interfund loans. Staff is proposing that these loans become fund equity transfers in recognition that the each deficit be resolved with a permanent funding solution. The Trail Construction Fund deficit should be covered by total transfers of $174,000 from the Community Infrastructure Fund. The Southshore Center deficit should be covered by total transfers of $44,000 from the General Fund. Future deficits in each of these funds should be covered in the same manner until neither the General Fund nor the MSA Fund has sufficient cash available. Financial or Budget Considerations: This action will bring each fund into balance at the end of 2013. Any deficits incurred in 2014 will have to be covered with additional transfers at a later date. Options: The City Council may choose to: 1. Authorize the transfers as presented. 2. Modify the amount or source of the transfers and approve them. Recommendation / Action Requested: Staff recommends that City Council authorize the transfers as presented. Next Steps and Timelines: This will clear the current deficits. Any future deficits will need to be cleared through similar means until the alternate sources of funds are exhausted. Connection to Vision / Mission: This contributes to sound financial management. Mission Statement: The City of Shorewood is committed to providing residents quality public services, a healthy environment, a variety of attractive amenities, a sustainable tax base, and sound financial management through effective, efficient, and visionary leadership. Page 1 CITY OF SHOREWOOD RESOLUTION NO. 14- A RESOLUTION APPROVING TRANSFERS OF FUNDS WHEREAS, the City Council of Shorewood recognizes that two fiinds have cash deficits at year end 2013; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to resolve those deficits through transfers planned as part of the Long -Range Financial Plan and Capital Improvement Plan; WHEREAS, the City Council has identified appropriate sources of fiinds to resolve those deficits; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Shorewood approves the following transfers as of December 31, 2013: 1. That the sum of $174,000 be transferred into the Trail Constriction Fund from the Community Infrastructure Fund as anticipated in the Long Range Financial Management Plan to reimburse that fiend for the cost of constriction activities authorized in the Capital Improvement Plan. 2. That the sum of $44,000 be transferred into the Southshore Center Fund from the General Fund to close the deficits through 2013. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD this 12th day of May, 2014. ATTEST: Jean Panchyshyn, City Clerk Scott Zerby, Mayor #5A MEETING TYPE City of Shorewood Council Meeting Item Regular Meeting Title / Subject: Public Hearing for Sunnyvale Lane Improvements, City Project 14 -01; Resolution Ordering Improvements and Preparation of Plans and Specifications Meeting Date: May 12, 2014 Prepared by: Paul Hornby Reviewed by: Attachments: Resolution 14 -_ Ordering Sunnyvale Lane Improvements, City Project 14 -01. Resident workshop Comment Cards (Copies will be provided at the meeting) Background: At the regularly scheduled meeting of the City Council on March 24, 2014, the City Council passed Resolution 14 -021, Receiving the Feasibility Report and Ordering the Public Improvement Hearing for the Sunnyvale Lane Improvements as part of the City's 2014 Street Capital Improvement Plan. The Notice of Public Hearing on the proposed improvements was published in the Sun - Sailor on April 17, 2014, and on April 24, 2014, and the Notice of Public Hearing was sent to benefiting property owners in accordance with MS Chapter 429, on April 24, 2014. The public hearing is held to allow interested persons to voice their opinions of the proposed improvements, whether or not they are in the proposed assessment area. The portion of the improvements identified to be assessed to benefitting properties in the Feasibility Report is the extension of City watermain, including hydrants, services and appurtenances necessary to provide access to the City water distribution system in the improvement area. Individual connections to the water system from the service stub to each house are the responsibility of the property owner. The proposed street and drainage improvements identified in the Feasibility Report are not proposed to be assessed. A resident workshop was held on February 27, 2014, to inform property owners abutting the improvement area of the proposed improvements and to hear concerns of those affected by the improvements in the project area. Five of the eight properties proposed for assessment were represented by the owners at the meeting. Three of the five owners had a preference against extension of City watermain, one owner was in favor of the extension if they could connect sometime in the future if their well failed, and one owner is already connected to the City water system. The resident comment cards will be provided to Council at the meeting. The improvements described in the Feasibility Report are necessary, cost effective, and feasible and will result in benefit to the properties proposed to be assessed. The Feasibility Report is included in the City Council documents for your reference. Mission Statement: The City of Shorewood is committed to providing residents quality public services, a healthy environment, a variety of attractive amenities, a sustainable tax base, and sound financial management through effective, efficient, and visionary leadership. Page 1 Financial or Budget Considerations: The total estimate of probable improvement project costs is in the amount of $585,119 with the street and drainage improvements proposed for funding by the City and watermain extension as an assessable improvement, with the following financial considerations: Street Improvements Total - $585,119 Street Improvement Fund $357,639 Sanitary Sewer Fund $ 21,862 Storm Water Fund $102,328 Watermain Extension $103,290 Watermain Improvements Total - $103,290 100% Assessment distributed equally to 6 benefitting properties Estimate of Assessment amount - $17,215 per parcel The properties proposed to be assessed are identified on the Preliminary Assessment Roll as: 3211723110010 25780 SUNNYVALE LA BENKA 3211723110011 25720 SUNNYVALE LA BENRENDS 3211723110012 25680 SUNNYVALE LA CARPENTER 3211723110013 25640 SUNNYVALE LA KELLER 3211723110017 25785 SUNNYVALE LA NELSON 3211723110016 25725 SUNNYVALE LA WAKEFIELD 3211723110015 25685 SUNNYVALE LA CARLSON 3211723110014 25645 SUNNYVALE LA SCHMIDT Options: The City Council has previously received the Feasibility Report and can order the improvement as defined in the report or reduce, but not increase the extent of the improvement as stated in the notice of hearing. City Council may want to consider the following in ordering the public improvements: Page 2 1. Order the improvements as stated in the Feasibility Report. 2. Order the improvements as stated in the Feasibility Report, except for the watermain improvements. 3. Other improvement considerations of the Council 4. Continue the Public Nearing to a later date 5. Take no action at this time (Council has 6 months after the date of public hearing to adopt the Resolution ordering the improvement ) Council action ordering the improvement that includes the improvements proposed for assessment requires a super majority vote of all members of the Council. Recommendation / Action Requested: Staff recommends the City Council pass Resolution 14 -_, Ordering the Project and Authorizing the Preparation of Plans and Specifications for the Sunnyvale Lane Improvements, City Project 14 -01, with options as determined by the Council. Next Steps and Timelines: City staff will initiate preparation of plans and specifications with the City consultant WSB. WSB will provide a Professional Services Agreement for the preparation of plans and specifications for the next Council meeting. A Resident Workshop will be held with residents in the improvement area to review the design and to answer general questions about the project. Page 3 RESOLUTION NO. 14- CITY OF SHOREWOOD A RESOLUTION ORDERING THE PROJECT AND AUTHORIZING THE PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR SUNNYVALE IMPROVEMENTS CITY PROJECT NO. 14 -01 WHEREAS, a resolution of the city council adopted the 24 "' day of March, 2014, fixed a date for a council hearing on Improvement No. 14 -01, the proposed improvement to construct Nvatermain as part of the improvement project of Sunn -,wale Lane between Meadovview Lane and Eureka Road, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapters 429.011 to 429.111, and WHEREAS, it is proposed to reconstruct Sunnyvale Lane by installing a new roadway subgrade, concrete curb and gutter, aggregate base, bituminous paving, storm seNver, sanitary seNver repairs, and Nvatermain, and to assess benefited properties for the Nvatermain portion of the improvement, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, and WHEREAS, ten days' mailed notice and two Nveeks' published notice of the hearing Nvas given, and the hearing Nvas held thereon on the 12 "' day of May, 2014, at which all persons desiring to be heard Nvere given an opportunity to be heard thereon, NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA: 1. Such improvement is necessary, cost - effective, and feasible as detailed in the feasibility report. 2. Such improvement is hereby ordered as proposed in the council resolution adopted the 12 "' day of May, 2014. The Project is in conformity N ith the ShoreNvood Comprehensive Plan and Capital Improvement Plan which have been adopted in accordance N ith the requirements of Minnesota Statutes Chapter 462. 4. WSB is hereby designated as the engineer for this improvement. The engineer shall prepare plans and specifications for the malting of such improvement. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD this 12 "' day of May, 2014. ATTEST: Jean Panchyshyn, City Clerk Scott Zerby, Mayor PLEASE COMMENT ON ANY ISSUES THE CITY SHOULD CONSIDER WHEN DESIGNING OR CONSTRUCTING THIS PROJECT? r i Old (�, /L�'�iE fL�i'1,'(,4'li7 is; vt' c '-4�y L1iP ttitY1 Iidr� fst4f'" &V:f \1(S)ia7:u4 ;;L YCxx- n7l li ` ye ' la'owi a le5 �J1 to i +1/1(J by( 4' 0 ° i tJl L 5 l>?roJ 1a Your Name 1 > f i H ii5 eq Y� Address a5760 5i,00N /VALE LkNL Email b r U ce 2 Co, me ?s i , 6om Phone 612 - sQ - aR72- cnYor SHOMWOOD PLEASE COMMENT ON ANY ISSUES THE CITY' SHOULD CONSIDER WHEN DESIGNING OR CONSTRUCTING THIS PROJECT? Your Name::191x 1e,, % Address ;x"67 $ uu ��� 1e ; Email 71,-� G SO Phone ,�9 /' 3 `, o f i ! 3` ' `f l i s crry or (r s?1Tl� SS,HOREWOO,D/ y PLEASE COMMENT ON ANY ISSUES THE CITY SHOULD CONSIDER WHEN DESIGNING OR CONSTRUCTING THIS PROJECT? ---- — -------- k4 L-Al- Your Name'/,'" b 6 Address Email -f�-,jc cl-�014 5 all Phone C11Yor, PLEASE COMMENT ON ANY ISSUES THE CITY SHOULD CONSIDER WHEN DESIGNING OR CONSTRUCTING THIS PROJECT? -- I I Your Name Address Email Phone CH Y OF SHOREWOOD Subject: FW: Council Pre Meeting Information for May 12 Attachments: MilfoilPhelpsShorewood.pdf; ShotrewoodPhelpsBay2014AIS.xIs From: Barb /Jack Kimball [mailto:kimballjac(alaol.com] Sent. Tuesday, May 06, 2014 8:34 PM To: City Hall Cc: iosh(&xlhockeyleaoue.com; judd(abvisi.com Subject: Council Pre Meeting Information for May 12 To Shorewood Council Reference: May 12 agenda Request by LMA Josh Leddy and Phelps Bay resident Jack Kimball for AIS Milfoil funds. Attachments: 1.Expected treatment area for Shorewood Phelps - 10.71 acres 2.Cost analysis Our request is for $6,000 ($4,200 Phelps, $1,800 Gideons). Thank you, Jack Kimball Shorewood Phelps Bay Captain 1 N Phelps Bay, Lake Minnetonka (27- 13307) W E PLM Lake & Land Management P.O. Box 328 S Meters Brainerd, MN 56401 0 180 360 720 11`Ii`ii`•p1mcorp.net �o 9�1444AN PGti Shorewood Phelps Bay 2014 AIS Treatment Shorewood Acres to treat Cost /acre Cost 2013 Costs 10.71 $ 1,010 $ 10,817 2013 detail Ave depth: 9ft Rate: 1.25ppm Committed Possible Total 2013 Carryover $ 300 $ 300 ID N R 6-5D $100 /acre $ 1,1-00 $ 1,1-00 LMCID $ - City $6000 70% to Phelps ''` $ 4,200 $ 4,200 Tota 1 $ 1,400 $ 4.P200 $ 5,600 Costs $ 10,817 Private Need $ 5,217 # donors at $400 13 2013 actual 12 '°Residents request $6,000 donation from City of Shorewood split 70/30 with Gideons) k,\ ;\ City of Shorewood Council Meeting Item Title / Subject: Presentation on the Lake Minnetonka Scenic Byway Concept Meeting Date: May 12, 2014 Prepared by: Jean Panchyshyn, City Clerk •V MEETING TYPE Regular Meeting Background: Councilmember Notvet will present information regarding the Lake Minnetonka Scenic Byway Concept. Additional background information has been provided to Council under separate cover, due to the volume of information provided. Council Action: A draft resolution authorizing a feasibility study for a Lake Minnetonka Scenic Byway Concept is attached for Council's consideration. Mission Statement: The City of Shorewood is committed to providing residents quality public services, a healthy environment, a variety of attractive amenities, a sustainable tax base, and sound financial management through effective, efficient, and visionary leadership. Page 1 CITY OF SHOREWOOD RESOLUTION NO. 14- A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING A FEASIBLITY STUDY FOR A LAKE MINNETONKA SCENIC BYWAY CONCEPT WHEREAS, the State of Minnesota has a scenic byway system with twenty one (2 1) designated state scenic byways, but none of the roads around Lake Minnetonka are included in a state scenic byway; and WHEREAS, the designation of a state scenic byway route imposes no financial or legal requirements on the participating jurisdictions, except the individual marketing and branding efforts determined by each jurisdiction, and that no new billboards are allowed along the route; and WHEREAS, participating communities within a designed scenic byway may apply for funding through the Federal Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) for eligible activities such as on -road and off -road trail facilities, historic preservation and rehabilitation efforts, and environmental mitigation, with a local match of twenty percent (20 %); and WHEREAS, there are fourteen (14) Lake Minnetonka area communities (City of Minnetonka Beach, City of Woodland, City of Deephaven, City of Tonka Bay, City of Minnetrista, City of Excelsior, City of Mound, City of Greenwood, City of Victoria, City of Spring Park, City of Minnetonka, City of Shorewood, City of Wayzata, and City of Orono; and WHEREAS, representatives from some of the fourteen (14) Lake Minnetonka area communities, Minnesota Department of Transportation's (MNDOT) Office of Scenic Byway Programs, Three Rivers Park District, Hennepin County, and the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) met on February 24, 2014 to initiate a discussion and a fact finding effort on the potential of a Lake Minnetonka area state scenic byway; and WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the February 24, 2014 meeting, the attendees agreed to bring forward a discussion of the Lake Minnetonka area scenic byway concept to their respective cities and jurisdictions to determine if there was support for pursuing the initiative fi rther; and WHEREAS, the attendees agreed to provide a response from their jurisdiction by June 1, 2014 on whether or not their jurisdiction was interested in further study of the feasibility of the Lake Minnetonka area state scenic byway; and WHEREAS, this response on fi rther studying the feasibility of the state level scenic byway concept does not formally commit a jurisdiction to a potential state -level scenic byway application at this time; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Shorewood City Council supports the fi rther study of the feasibility of the Lake Minnetonka area state scenic byway concept; and BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED, that the Shorewood City Council recommends that a stewardship group of interested members from the above listed jurisdictions be created to fiirther study the feasibility of the Lake Minnetonka area state scenic byway, and report back to all interested jurisdictions periodically with their findings. Adopted by the Shorewood City Council this 12th day of May, 2014. Scott Zerby, Mayor ATTEST: Jean Panchyshyn, City Clerk City of Shorewood Council Meeting Item Title / Subject: Zoning Violation Appeal —Thomas Kiefer Meeting Date: 12 May 2014 Prepared by: Brad Nielsen Attachments: Planning Director's Memorandum 1� MEETING TYPE Regular Meeting Policy Consideration: Should the City grant additional time for Thomas Kiefer's son to repair a vehicle that has been sitting on blocks in the driveway since February? Also, should the Kiefers be allowed to store a skid steer vehicle (aka Bobcat) on residential property? Background: See attached memorandum. Financial or Budget Considerations: Neighbors are concerned about adverse effects on property values. Options: Grant the appellants additional time to repair the vehicle in question; deny the request for additional time; determine that commercial equipment (skid steer) is "incidental to residential use" of property; agree with staff and neighbors that a skid steer is not an allowable residential accessory use. Recommendation / Action Requested: Staff recommends that the appellant be granted until 23 May to complete the repair of the vehicle in question, after which administrative penalties should accrue, once each week while the vehicle remains in violation. With respect to the skid steer (Bobcat), if it is to be kept on the property in question in the future, it should be stored inside the garage. Further, the appellant should be clearly advised that the residential property in question is not authorized for business use. Next Steps and Timelines: Staff will report on the status of the violations at the 27 May Council meeting. Connection to Vision / Mission: Healthy environment, sustainable tax base. Mission Statement: The City of Shorewood is committed to providing residents quality public services, a healthy environment, a variety of attractive amenities, a sustainable tax base, and sound financial management through effective, efficient, and visionary leadership. Page 1 CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD . SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 - 8927 • (952)960 -7900 FAX (952) 474 -0128 www.d.shorewood.mmus . c1tyha1I @d.shorewood.mn;us f MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Brad Nielsen DATE 7 May 2014 E RE: Kiefer, Tom and Betsy Appeal of Zoning Violation Letter FILE NO.: Property (28150 Boulder Bridge Drive) In late March, our office received a neighborhood complaint alleging that numerous vehicles, some of which were inoperable, were being kept at the above- referenced address. The complaint also alleged 'that a skid steer vehicle (aka Bobcat) was kept on the property. After inspection, the owner was sent a zoning violation letter (see Exhibit A). The letter advises the owner that vehicles must be licensed and operable and registered to residents of the property. At the time of inspection, a white van (see photo attached to Exhibit A) was` cited as not being registered to someone living on the premises (it was registered to someone in Delano) and it was j acked up on j ack stands, j rendering it inoperable. A red pickup truck was noted as having expired tabs. The skid steer was cited as not being an allowable accessory use (Section 1201.11 Subd. 31) because this piece of equipment is not considered to be "incidental to the residential use of the property". Staff has since met with Ryan Kiefer to discuss the appeal letter sent by him and his father, Thomas (see Exhibit B). Ryan has indicated that he owns the van in question and has recently obtained the appropriate license for it in his name. He was advised that if the proper license was, displayed as of a follow -up inspection, that would resolve the ownership issue. Taking the vehicle off the jack stands would resolve the inoperable issue. He has explained that he was waiting for necessary parts to become available. It is worth noting that Section 502.04 states that a vehicle may be kept on private property for the purpose of making repairs, provided that the repair period can't exceed 30 days. By Ryan Kiefer's own admission, the vehicle has been there' since February. A follow-up, inspection was done on 7 May to check the status of vehicle registrations. At that time the red pickup was not on the site and the license for the white van was not visible from I E ®�® PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER Memorandum Re: Kiefer Appeal 7 May 2014 the street. Another follow -up inspection will be made before Monday night's meeting and staff will report on the status of violations at the meeting. With respect to the skid steer, as of this writing it has been removed from the site and at present is not a violation. Ryan Kiefer wishes to address this item now, however, disagreeing with staff's determination that this is a commercial piece of equipment. His argument is that because he uses it to plow snow from their driveway and for gardening purposes, it is incidental to the residential use of the property. Again, by Ryan's own admission he has done work for people in the neighborhood for which he has received money. Staff has advised Ryan that he cannot operate a business in a residential zoning district. A follow -up letter from the president of the Boulder Bridge Farm HOA has since been received by our office (see Exhibit C). The aforementioned follow -up inspection included tanks that were being stored on the property that were allegedly being used to store biodiesel fuel. Section 609.02 of the City Code prohibits the storage of more than ten gallons of fuel. While the size of the tanks (see photo — Exhibit D) accommodates more than that, Mrs. Kiefer has advised our inspector that the tanks are no longer being used for biodiesel fuel. According to her, one of the tanks is now being used for composting and the other one will be removed from the site. Staff has advised complainants that the City Code does not regulate the number of vehicles that may be kept on a residential lot. The vehicles must, however, be currently licensed and operable. As such, the white van stands in violation. The City Council has been asked to grant an extension of time for completion of the repair (the undated appeal letter indicates that Ryan Kiefer needs another week to obtain the necessary part). By Monday night's meeting, at least two weeks time will have elapsed since the letter was received. Staff will do another follow -up inspection on Monday and will update the status of violations at the meeting that night. With respect to the skid steer, Ryan Kiefer has been advised that it will be cited as a violation if it returns to the property, unless it is stored inside the garage. Tom Kiefer is also advised by copy of this memorandum. Cc: Bill Joynes Tim Keane Tom and Ryan Kiefer Patti Helgesen Joe Pazandak -2- CITY •OF : .SORETO:�,- ':5758: COUNTRY . CLUB ROADr •.SHOREWOO.D,•MINNESOTA'5.5331 - 8927•'(952) 960 - 7900:.. FAX (952) 474 -0128 �•www.ci.shdrewood:mrims • cityhaftgi.sh.oroyvbod.mn:us 26 iVlarch 2014.. . Thonias':and'Betsy1Kiefer' . . .. 28150. Boulder Bridge I��rive� � . - '. - - .; - - • ; - Shorewoo:d,1VIN.r5533'1 _ , Zoning Violations,— 28150 80iildei Bi idge lDrive: IDear NIr. "and :Mrs: Kiefer: : The City of`Shi rewood l as recently, received complaints abot}t numerous vehicles beirig,stored " on:youur property at the above- referenced' address...The' 80#iplaints.allege.that some of the , - vehicles'are inoperable: The coriiplaints''als` 'e- B r to a skid steer-b.eing stored iii tlie;yard: Shorewood'. Cty'Gode :providcs.tl�ai vehicles or''.equipix�erit being stored on.property which are riot-'reg -- tered to'ain.occuparit of that:ptopetty,'are in'`violation.•of'Section :1201;11: Subd'. (Permitted Accessory Uses)::. ::Furtlierinore; the' Code allows' for .the f street parl�ing of aicensed snd. operable 15assenger'caxs; :trucks; aiid-reereattonal-,' ve4icles;dnd.e4uipment..1 .regardao commercial'vehicles or:equipment; : 'the• -Code states tliat- required parking shall riot- be-used for ;tl e.stoi;age of Oniinercial.vehicle&or ,the arl ing'of automobilesbe long, to<employees; owners; tenants: or. customers of. a :business: However; -Section 1201'.10 Subd. 3:i. provides that oiie (1) commercial vehicle or, equipment may be stored: in a przdate garage. In, other - words, all`vehicles'parked ori'the'site on a`,daily basis inust'be licensed:(up =to- date); be -in.. operable co-Aa tion;:and be •regist'ered to-an owner or occuparit'of the'propei�y; unlessahcy.are stored withiti a,garage or fully•screened fiom view.: -The skid steer crust ,lie stored within a garage or be removed. f rom'the' site:.. The above= xrierit oned;violations rriust be corrected "wit ffilen (10) days. Your property will be• inspected for'coznpliance on or.aboiit TAprit- 014.. Ariy.viotation- found .to exist at or afte'r,'hat ' time:will be`subject to Administrative Enforcement'which caz�iesr a penalty starting at $300'. If you wiskiao' appeal this matter to the City Courial,•.you.inust do •so'in wyrltxng before 7 ;April 2014: �> Exhibit A • -. :, ��«�.PRINTED QN RECYGLED.PAPER - Appeal: Cily of Sborewood The following is an appeal to reason with the City of Shorewood that most of the complaints and or allegations made against us and contained in a letter written to us are false, and that the remaining may either be understood that we are in compliance or appeal, we may need more information, or that we may simply need more time in becoming compliant. All of the vehicles that are and have been In our lot belong to us and occupants of this address. The Bobcat has been used only for snow removal on our property for the past 6 months and continues to be used on this property not for commercial purposes but private work relative to our home here. Only the removal of snow on our property and the maintenance of our garden which paused last fall and will resume shortly neither of which is a commercial application. Ryan has worked hard to maintain only vehicles registered to this address over the course of this winter while being employed by a local company and paying student loans. As with all vehicles being worked on, there is a time period which one must wait for parts. This winter Ryan has done major repair work on 4 vehicles licensed to him or occupants of this address. All of the vehicles being worked on were fully insured and continue to be insured as the repairs are temporary and part of owning a vehicle. Working on a vehicle, to our understanding, is not against any ordinance, there is an ordinance such activity please inform us of that ordinance. 3 vehicles have been completed this winter and one remains. One vehicle remaining currently under repair is a white'chevy astro minivan which belongs to Ryan. The van has current tabs, and has been insured for the past year and is currently insured. Although this vehicle is certainly in good operating condition, Ryan has been working on pre- emptive part replacement and enhancing the vehicles safety and functionality while awaiting parts that he intends on replacing once they become available pending more favorable weather conditions. It would be an unsafe and an extreme unnecessary inconvenience to have him reposition this vehicle, under these conditions, simply to comply with a mostly erroneous complaint alleging that it does not belong to an occupant or suggest that it or any other vehicle here belonged to an employee — the latter two of which are false, simply to comply with this letter and a time frame based on allegations without consulting him. Ryan has worked diligently on procuring parts over the past 2 weeks, but must wait at least another week as the particular donor vehicle is frozen. The owner of the lots name is Carl. Should you doubt any of this information, do not hesitate to contacting Carl to confirm the condition of the situation of his yard in Roseville which he owns called U Pull Our parts — the identification of the donor vehicle is UB 1135. Carl is well aware of Ryan's dilfegent effort and his own to assist him in procurring the parts for his pre - emptive part replacement. Its important that you know we feel unnecessarily harassed by the actions of your board and the members of this community. Although we have been a bee keeping family well in advance of any legislation regulating bee keeping, we levied complaints not only for having bees, but allegations that we had a commercial bee operation which was inspected by Joe Pazendak several years prior. Then like now, Joe Pazendak inspected our property and bees hives and confirmed this allegation to be totally false and a non - issue. Additionally the fall before last, complaints were made as he was doing maintenance to our garden. After a visit by the Lake Minnehaha Creek Watershed district, where he was found to be in no way violating any ordinance it was found that our adjacent neighbor had been illegally culling catails. Although this was seen by the summoned Watershed representative, it was not our initiative to levee complaints nor judgement upon others as we seek first to understand our neighbors. Although the season will soon change the 6obcat will be moved, the letter clearly advises removal of the bobcat, we are not sure that having a bobcat onsite is actually against any ordinance. 2 ordinances are cited in the letter. Section 1201.11 Subd. 3.h. Permitted Accessory Uses does not to our understanding of the letter prohibit outside storage of personal equipment. Although according to the letter 120 1. 10 Subd. 31 does provide commercial vehicle or equipment may be stored in a private garage, where does it say that it cannot be stored outside? For our_ uVi le, Ntuding can anv ordinance prohlbiling outside &,fo a e o our gqui,9 ent be c1ted7 We would appreciate your attempt to understand our perspective and questions as well as sincerely, hope you will do your best to help us before placing hasty judgement based on quick yet perpetual complaints others have placed against us as.we =patiently and cooperatively try to facilitate pe of l discussions of these matters. Tom Kiefer l -�' 28150 Boulder Bridge Drive Excelsior MN 55331 Exhibit B .;°tee Y April 25, 2014 Brad Nielsen City of Shorewood Dear Mr. Nielsen, Pursuant to our conversations on April 24 and 25, I am lodging this formal complaint as the president of the Boulder Bridge Farm Homeowner's Association regarding inoperable vehicles and landscaping operations at the Kiefer residence at 28150 Boulder Bridge Dr. I called the city within the past two months regarding this property. I also called last year, although the city did not take down my name. As stated in these conversations, if this situation is on the agenda, I am willing to attend the May 12 council meeting as president of our board. I am willing to discuss at that meeting that our board has had a long battle regarding these issues with no success. These are some of the issues which have been troubling for our neighborhood, some for as long as eight years, with issues only getting worse recently: 1. As Ryan Kiefer has removed trees from another property, they would wind up in the Kiefer's front yard, where Ryan would cut them up so he could bury them in the back yard for "carbon sequestration ", as late as 2AM. There would be wood in the Kiefer front yard for days after it was removed from a neighbor's yard. 2. The bobcat, which has been used for at least three tree removal projects on properties in our neighborhood, has been a fixture on the side of the house for at least three years. 3. He has had a large commercial wood chipper in the driveway for days on multiple instances. To the best of my knowledge, it was not used for any work done on the Kiefer property. 4. He used to have a large boat trailer which had been adapted to haul logs parked on the street at various places in the neighborhood over a two month period. It took some effort on the part of the board to stop this behavior. 5. He has stored tanks containing "biodiesel" in the yard. I don't know if they are still there. 6. He has had inoperable vehicles stored in the front and back yard. 7. He has had a white van on jack stands in the driveway ever since the start of winter. 8. There was another inoperable car in the driveway for months with a jack stand and a wheel propped up against the rear bumper. 9. He cleared snow from some of the yard this winter so he would have more room for vehicles. Our board is composed of volunteers who live within our small community of 44 homes. As such, it is difficult to have one neighbor impose sanctions upon another. To the best of any current board member's knowledge, no resident has had usage of community property (e.g. usage of a boat slip) revoked for issues regarding the state of their private Exhibit C property. That is the main power of enforcement which we can apply to a situation such as this. The number of conversations noted between residents acting on their own or as part of the board and the Kiefers regarding these situations is too numerous to detail. After such conversations, Tom Kiefer has at times walked on other resident's property to catalog their offenses, so these neighbors would be less enthused to lodge a complaint. If the Kiefers worked to remove improve an issue to resolve a conflict, the overall situation would usually revert or get worse than it was within two months. In short, it has been exceedingly difficult for our community to resolve this situation on our own. The Boulder Bridge board does request that the City of Shorewood enforce the laws which are relevant to this situation. As our neighborhood is zoned as residential, we ask that commercial landscaping activities be disallowed and equipment for such activities be removed from the yard and driveway. We also ask that inoperable vehicles be removed and are only allowed as per city ordinance. If the city is considering an appeal, we ask that you consider that there has been a long history to this set of problems. If an extension is granted, please make sure that a second extension is not granted. Please be aware that the situation at this residence will have to be monitored for continued compliance. We deeply appreciate that the city is addressing this problem and our board will do whatever we can to assist in the resolution. Sincerely, Cal Wright President - Boulder Bridge Farm Homeowner's Association P� ;' ... , gyp,, %� ' . ! �.. M 1 • 1 - � • 1. a Al - `.Y, . v�511 4 ♦ T ^� r oor... _ _. C f' . •C � y. P 1, s' _ ,.• TI i1 / : S•�1 1 i ' d WON owl City of Shorewood Council Meeting Item Title / Subject: Zoning Violation Appeal — Mark Klesk Meeting Date: 12 May 2014 Prepared by: Brad Nielsen Attachments: Planning Director's Memorandum #8C MEETING TYPE Regular Meeting Policy Consideration: Should the City grant additional time for Mark Klesk to remove a large shipping container from his property at 4390 Enchanted Point? Background: See attached memorandum. Financial or Budget Considerations: Neighbors are concerned about adverse effects on property values. Options: Grant the appellant additional time to comply with the City Code; deny the request for additional time. Recommendation / Action Requested: Staff recommends that the appellant be granted until 23 May to remove the shipping container, unless as suggested earlier, he can get a new garage framed in within 30 days. Next Steps and Timelines: Staff will report on the status of the violations at the 27 May Council meeting. Connection to Vision / Mission: Healthy environment, sustainable tax base. Mission Statement: The City of Shorewood is committed to providing residents quality public services, a healthy environment, a variety of attractive amenities, a sustainable tax base, and sound financial management through effective, efficient, and visionary leadership. Page 1 5756 C,OUNTRY.CLUB ROAD t_SHORE!NOOD,'M(NNESOTA 55331- 8927- �`(952)�960- 7900; ,',.=•:' FAX:(952)'4'74 =0128: , wwivi. ci: siiorewood. mn. us' •'eltyhallC�cl.shoreivootl.mri.us 1 :4 April'-201'4 Marl;'. and Be�er1 'A, Kleslc y : '. 4390:Enoharited "Point ' :I•:. '':' Shorewood, MN'; 55,364': ,. • . : :: : Re: Zoriirig Violations — 4390 Eiicharited Point ' -�;LN,' 3 :01'17.= 23 -33- 0027; :' NIi'aiidMrs:'Klesk office has received coin "Iaints'alle in 'that ce'tain.Cii' Code violati ns.e "ist on' �ouir z o'er` i;.0ur p g. g �. y,, o Y P..? .'at -the, above = referenced address "The coni lai d - :, as •ii aril y in.'re aid, o-a lai . e white trailer /structure located near, tlie_public-. right -of way, of EnchantedToi_nt hove eY, -fit i's,.the` Giiy'a : ' ,policy to investigate all Code violations preses�t;wheri espgriig to. a complaint: tc't e 'Bite frailer s ct •.c a � oxi' atel 8: x.40`• in size' Gi Code Section - 12.0, -L 03 :Tn'regard h w tau ul , ppi y. ty. Sabd•.:7.b.(1)states :thai-al defacW.'aceessoiy,buil' dings ri'cxcess: of"150'scivare feet ini floor area: ' shall Ue,. constructed "with mate ials antf 'a desigri'compatible yvit i,th& general:chaiacter of'th& - .print pal`structu e'bnal e Ioi: ;I o building iri:excess`�of,1.2,0`s4ua e-fee' n floor area sha11 be.'. " constructed`of;'sheet or grrugated�steel,. aluriiinum asbestos or fiberglass: tivithin a xesidentlal : ;. district:';truct'ures in- ecess.of 10O.s`quaie:fee; are, subject to.the.full l�titil'dirig setbacl� for the' r _ .lining district iri wh ch'tl ey are locateel in. Jn peeti'oii of the pr mises''also ae ealed•the.foflow ng violations-,of Shorewood'sl'Zoni49 Go de:' : < • Traile��; license No'. AI�U188. - .nQt egr tee ecao.p�ope`t ty orze� ' o'�; szie nc�fjess' F ' Boat,_ Liieense No: TIN 0587,'B: (`09)'- not i, gistel edl to•p�opeW 61meronsite addiiesV • - Soat t "railer; - lkehse: hof-P& -e The . parking ;o �'sto "rage:of:veliicles. and equipment o'ri proper by in- r`esMpAtial• zoning' districts. is .an . accessory,use mterided solely for;utfl zation,by :persozis'residing_ upon thpe premises, e eept:fo,� s "torage within'an erielosed`garage.. Ctlei• restrictions'ipay also apply. ,.. The above - mentioned violations must be'cgi� ected within ten (f 0), days:' Your pr'operty'will be re- inwected;for complianee.on;.or 4 oui.16 Apiil'2014.;- Any violaiio�'-foub -to exist at or after that _ date wi11 be subj ctto,Administrat ve Enforcemeiifwhich- cames:apenalty starting at-$300 00 per ' ;. offense;' Tfyou Wish to appeal this matter toahe City`Coiiiicii; you must do so .in writing_before'. r' _ : r Exhibit A • • '- _ - ' .' .. _ �BaO PRINTED ON.RECYCLED PAPER " 1Vlarl R.; and Beverly A., Xlesk Page, two: '.:.16 Apxil'2014, Youy appeal must state vvhy you; can riot or will notccoi�ect the violations, ox if'yon',' request additional tirrie for comp fiance, how mnchaime: Youx;avn en appeal, 'stop further'. action until such time' as ;tlie' City Council has.considexed .the matter:. ' Also:'enclosed is a: ".Notice to Remove " :citing •v olations• 6f.Chdpter,501 •o£tlie City Code. If;yo ltt hesitaeaomofce:uhave ary.qestons:reldtive -to thiseez,plean oau ' CITY,QF IHOREWOOD $rddley j:'Nielsen. Planning I�iectox : ` : •„ ; ph • . ;Eric. '.: • -' • � - •; • .. - '. - . • . C. Joe Pazaxidak' : • ' . :.._ V1i11 am Joynes anQ . 'r::: �•n Du.ns Grady '' l�• p. .i.:� IS:�a 65311 `� - `, � ; � wc�.. �� • �41 � ,r iJ I1 N ✓� ' =1 ow 2n 4.*5% °9 30 < c \ �I NI N� CLAs6lf�C y rk tv 7 • '�"•J 4'r r - G - • a ca • •4 b� ,\ +: TAE uz IN ID '•. �" - -- - 15'2 5 ser A vi 0420, now Irv, _: -.w�' mss: \ \�- •$ '+ - - ._ - ;y:.s. �; ; .. winos ls�r -iJ f = i _— - -� I r~ 4°l Y It AfN v g r -. ' � �� -__� G Patti Helgesen From: Brad Nielsen Sent: Monday, April 21, 2014 10:25 AM To: Patti Helgesen Subject: FW: zoning violation letter 4390 Enchanted point Planning Director 952 - 960 -7912 From: Mark Klesk [mailto:markklesk @ gmail.com] Sent: Friday, April 18, 2014 12:56 PM To: Brad Nielsen Subject: zoning violation letter 4390 Enchanted point Mr. Bradley Nielsen, Wanted to provide you with a status update regarding zoning violations at PIN 30- 117 -23 -33 -0027. All items have been addressed and corrected with the exception of the storage container and the Trailer lie # ADEU188 which will be removed(off premisses) no later than 4/20. I have made arrangements for that. The boat reg. and license has been transferred to me. and the trailer license was secured and title application was completed today. Will I be receiving communication regarding the storage container and my request to use it during construction of a garage on the property this summer? I appreciate your help and direction in dealing with this matter. Thank you Mark Klesk 952- 472 -4070 Exhibit B City of Shorewood Council Meeting Item Title / Subject: Zoning Violation /Notice to Remove Appeal — Michael Hoy Meeting Date: 12 May 2014 Prepared by: Brad Nielsen Attachments: Planning Director's Memorandum ML MEETING TYPE Regular Meeting Policy Consideration: Should the City grant additional time for Michael Hoy to comply with a zoning violation letter and Notice to Remove for his property at 25560 Smithtown Road? Background: See attached memorandum. Financial or Budget Considerations: Neighbors are concerned about adverse effects on property values. Options: Grant the appellant additional time to comply with City Code requirements; deny the request for additional time. Recommendation / Action Requested: Staff recommends that the appellant be granted until 27 May to complete the cleanup of the site and correct the various violations noted in the zoning violation letter and Notice to Remove. Next Steps and Timelines: Staff will report on the status of the violations at the 27 May Council meeting. Connection to Vision / Mission: Healthy environment, sustainable tax base. Mission Statement: The City of Shorewood is committed to providing residents quality public services, a healthy environment, a variety of attractive amenities, a sustainable tax base, and sound financial management through effective, efficient, and visionary leadership. Page 1 CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD . SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 -8927 • (952) 960 -7900 FAX (952) 474 -0128 • www.ci.shorewood.mn.us • cityhaI1@ci.shorewood.mn.us { i i MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Brad Nielsen DATE: 8 Ma y 2014 I RE: Hoy, Michael Appeal Notice to Remove I i FILE NO.: Property(25560 Smithtown Road) In early April our office received resident complaints regarding the above - referenced property, owned by Michael Hoy. After inspecting the property in question a "Notice to Remove" was sent out listing numerous items in violation of Shorewood's Municipal Code (see Exhibit A, attached). Mr. Hoy subsequently appealed (see Exhibit B), however, his appeal letter did not explain what he was appealing (e.g. objection to requirements?, additional time ?, etc.). After discussing this with Patti Helgesen yesterday, Mr. Hoy provided the following: • The blue van will be registered in his name at his address • The boat on the trailer will either be moved into his bain or removed from the property • Some guard rails on the site will be used on the front porch • The barrel in the driveway is there to mark/protect the well head • = He will clean up brush and logs with chain saw when the ground dries out enough to be safe .(for good footing when chain sawing) • He will haul other items to the dump this weekend 0 He will move snowmobile into better compliance with property boundaries The property was re- inspected on 7 May and the inspector indicates that fairly significant { progress has been made toward compliance (approximately 50 percent). In light of this and the applicant's apparent willingness to comply with the codes, staff suggests that an additional two weeks be granted to comply with the notice: This includes removal of the ice house /shed that appears to be partly on the LRT right-of-way. The property will be re- inspected on 27 May and staff will report on the status of violations at the Council meeting that night. Cc: Bill Joynes Patti Helgesen Tim Keane Joe Pazandak Michael Hoy ®�® PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER s S CITY -OF S.M.. 'L�'E�VV O O'�: 5755 COU(VTRY. CLUB' ROAD SHO.REV1/OOD;;'MINNESOTA 55331 8927`�r'(952).960' 7900 . FAX (952) 474;0128 ci`.sh.ore'wood.mn.us cityhall'@ci.shorewood.mn.us". DATE': Apri19, X01'41 TO: 1V,ti6h6b; 2548.0 Smitlito wn:Oa - d "- Shorewood;. MIN., 55331. Y :, PROPERTY LOCATION: .'25560 Smithtown'Ro'ad : PROPERTY -ID ENTIFICATION'NO.:•..33= .1T7 -2 423= 0004,,,', - y • f•_. . XOTICI ±�'TO REMOVE, Offensiye'arid'Unhealthy Snbstarices` . . r' NOTICE IS: HEREBY GIVEN fhat,there exists a. cond tioii'on the above referenced propel ty . wkiich; s in w olatiori of Chapter 501, Section 501.05+;. Subd.. 9' ofthe 'Shoxewood' City Code;, a ' copy of which Soction is .enclosed. 'The offensive. xnattr, to'be removed'fron the'propeity, }j includes; but is. not'limited;to'the following: ' VEHICLES :OR EQUIPMENT- NOT,REGIS:TERED,TO OCCUPANT OF•PROPERTY 'AND /OR:INOPE"lB E: Snowmobile; Lic .No,` CD43'&9 = 'stored in I1RT Trail.r,o.vi�.'area and not registered:to' occupant_ `.. at pi•operty;address ` Chevrolet Van (white) Lic;Na; YAG8942` "(Feb' 15)'= license not on file' :- Ford,Van ( blue).; e; No..:RJH991j(- Oct'..13')._= expired+ not register ed to property,address OTHER: , } Bi:ush; landscape edging;enee parts; :dilapidated:ferice; timbers; conditioner tinits; pails; :pagit,cans; Oipes; trash;•shoes ;. bbo.ots; co.oking.appliaiices;,. ;. guard rail parts; carpeting;; i texior fiirriiture;'storage bins; lumber; five.(5) lawnmowers;-veh cle•door;; plastic; broken. crate; :dilapidated v_ inyl canopy;_ 'auto parts; , 'ear seat; be Aar iarrel; tools' broken shovel;` other: similar miscellaneous , . ,. - ' items: : _; •'• _ � . ' - _: ' _ .. - • , ,. You are: hereby required to zemove the above_ described matter:and'any -other offens ve'matt., located'oii the property and m yiolatioin'of Chapter 501; Section - 501".05 within tern (1:0)' days from- - the.datehereof '.ln:the `alternative, you May, At a Written notice; of appeal at the, Shor& odd City .: - - Hall within ten (10)' days,.in wliieh case yourappeal will.be set hearing' at the next' regularly:' scheduled meeting'of the City" Council: If-' ou d'' not respond to, this Notice'within ten days;.tlie matter:shall :be subject to.Adininistraiive Enforcement:which`iriay.result in -penalties -starting' at, $100.-,,. . Exhibit A f ,16 PRINTED- ON. RECYCLED PAPER' Hennepin County Property Interactive Map Page 1 of 1 Interactive Maps Search Map Advanced Find a PID or an address on the map 9 Print E Link unKs Tax information View obliaue imaaery (Bins mans Survey documents About the data PID:331172323OOO4 25560 Smithtown Rd Shorewood, MN 55331 Owner /Taxpayer Owner: Michael D Hoy MICHAEL D HOY 25480 SMITHTOWN Taxpayer: RD SHOREWOOD MN 55331 Legend Measure http: / /gis.co.hennepin.mn.us /property/ map /default.aspx ?pid = 3311723230004 4/2/2014 41 777!,. ;I 4A rA e JI .G8 „42� J I �'� oqa� �a�o�a ��_� N(,-71L C, r- --T-Z:3 P -T-E -TfH-5 4 R E- c/ (q- Lo [--TVRtyj�� APR 17 2014 CITY OF Exhibit B #QA MEETING TYPE City of Shorewood Council Meeting Item Regular Meeting Title / Subject: Summit Avenue Roadway Alternatives Meeting Date: May 12, 2014 Prepared by: Paul Hornby Reviewed by: Attachments: Alternatives Figures Background: Summit Avenue is a public roadway extending from the south City border with Chanhassen (at Hummingbird Road) to Murray Hill Road. Summit Avenue is approximately 940 feet in length and varies in width from 13 feet to 20 feet. The City Council received comments from residents about concerns of the street width and the slope of the roadway from Murray Hill Road and the top of the hill, during the Summit Woods PUD Concept phase planning process. The roadway is deficient in width by current City standards and the roadway slope is an existing condition due to topographic conditions of the area. City staff did present alternatives to the Mayor and Council at the Retreat session on February 8, 2014. The presented alternatives were schematic and included: 1. Reconstruction of the roadway meeting current City design guidelines 2. Construct cul -de -sacs to reduce the travel on the steepest section of roadway 3. Construct cul -de -sacs in Alternative 2 and reconstruct the upper segment of roadway to City design guidelines. 4. Convert the roadway to one -way of travel with two alternatives The Council consensus was for staff to prepare cost opinions for the alternatives presented. The opinion of probable project costs is provided below. The project costs are conservatively estimated at a "concept level" based on average costs for the construction of previous City street projects, adjustment by the construction cost index, and indirect costs. 1. Reconstruction Alternative — Based on two 11 -foot wide driving lanes, curb and gutter, storm sewer, subgrade correction, retaining walls, and restoration. Project Cost Opinion is $840,000. Construct two Cul -de -sacs — Based on constructing two cul -de -sacs with diameter of 70 -feet to fit within the existing right of way. Pavement section includes bituminous pavement on aggregate base, bituminous curb, retaining wall, bollards, signage and restoration. The bollards are to restrict motorized vehicle use of a portion of the existing roadway that will remain as a trail /emergency access road. Project Cost Opinion $132,000. 3. Cul -de -sacs with Reconstruction of upper roadway segment - Based on two 11 -foot wide driving lanes, curb and gutter, storm sewer, subgrade correction, cul -de -sacs, and restoration. Project Cost Opinion is $300,000. Mission Statement: The City of Shorewood is committed to providing residents quality public services, a healthy environment, a variety of attractive amenities, a sustainable tax base, and sound financial management through effective, efficient, and visionary leadership. Page 1 4. One -way traffic conversion — Based upon providing one -way, and do not enter signs at the roadway end points and advanced warning signs for the curve and steep grade. Project Cost Opinion $2,400. Recommendation / Action Requested: The information is provided for discussion purposes and not for Council action at this time. Staff recommends eliminating Alternative 4 — One -way Conversion because this alternative will have result in travel up or down the steep grade during seasonal conditions, removing an alternate access through Chanhassen. O 0 3 aYfloWer Rd Oa s A ^^ O YI W 3 � r � a N � A 3 a 3 D m I O BEGIN t m 3 x a O tt m (�1�.�.�.�� m EGIN ONE WAY W N O A O W O W D a � a = a M z _ E 3 2 ommer d Coa OHO^ �i V c� �o END ONE T 1 WAY Melody Hill 1411, Me o Y � ill t Access NB /SB Roads Via Melody Hill Rd Legend T Proposed Sign Location Proposed Traffic Flow Summit Avenue One -Way Alternative 1 0 too 200 Feet N TSB ®v or City of Shorewood, MN January 2014 �A SI1012F.uoo O 0 aYfloWer Rd 3 Oa s ^^ YI A O � 3 r � � a N A C1. � 3 3 D m O Y END ONE WAY co � D N A1W� 3 X t ® BEGIN ONE WAY 1 BEGIN ONE 1 WAY Q 0 0 m w N O A O N D a � a = M a L c� C •� 3 Sornmergat `A A�Ads d Coa OHO^ �i V c� �o Melody Hill Rd Me o Y � ill t Legend T Proposed Sign Location Proposed Traffic Flow Summit Avenue N One -Way Alternative 2 ®v o too 200 -cQ ��+�+ or City of Shorewood, MN SI1012F.uoo January 2014 �A #9B MEETING TYPE City of Shorewood Council Meeting Item Regular Meeting Title / Subject: City request for speed study on Summit Avenue Meeting Date: May 12, 2014 Prepared by: Paul Hornby Reviewed by: Attachments: Resolution No. 14- Requesting MnDOT perform a speed study on Summit Avenue Background: The City Council has recently considered and approved (through the plan development stage) a subdivision along Summit Avenue north of Hummingbird Road. During the proposed Summit Woods subdivision project development stages, the Council did hear comments from residents regarding traffic speed, roadway grade, and sightlines. The Council is considering alternative improvements to Summit Avenue based upon comments received by residents. The Council requested staff prepare a formal request for a speed study to be performed by MnDOT to receive an independent opinion for the recommended speed for Summit Avenue between Hummingbird Road and Murray Hill Road. The enclosed Resolution requesting the Minnesota Department of Transportation conduct a speed /traffic study on Summit Avenue is provided for Council consideration of approval. Recommendation / Action Requested: Staff Recommends Council Approve Resolution 14- a Resolution Requesting the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MNDOT) Conduct a Traffic Investigation /Speed Study on Summit Avenue between Hummingbird Lane (City of Chanhassen, Carver County) and Murray Hill Road in the City of Shorewood, Hennepin County Minnesota, and authorize staff to submit the resolution to MnDOT. Next Steps and Timelines: Upon City Council approval, staff will send the resolution to MnDOT for their review and study. Mission Statement: The City of Shorewood is committed to providing residents quality public services, a healthy environment, a variety of attractive amenities, a sustainable tax base, and sound financial management through effective, efficient, and visionary leadership. Page 1 CITY OF SHOREWOOD RESOLUTION NO. 14- A RESOLUTION REQUESTING THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (MnDOT) CONDUCT A TRAFFIC INVESTIGATION /SPEED STUDY ON SUMMIT AVENUE BETWEEN HUMMINGBIRD LANE (CITY OF CHANHASSEN, CARVER COUNTY) AND MURRAY HILL ROAD IN THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD, HENNEPIN COUNTY MINNESOTA WHEREAS, the City of Shorewood is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, Summit Avenue between Hummingbird Road and Murray Hill is in a residential area; and WHEREAS, City Staff and Council have received concerns regarding the safety of this roadway due to the width, curvature, sight distance, and grade on various segments of Summit Avenue; and WHEREAS, A proposed subdivision will add four new residential parcels with frontage and access on Summit Avenue; and WHEREAS, the Commissioner of Transportation sets regulatory speed limits on all local roads based on a thorough engineering and traffic investigation; and WHEREAS, the Shorewood City Council has identified that Summit Avenue is geometrically deficient and in need of an independent traffic and speed study with regard to width, grade and sight distance. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Shorewood hereby requests MnDOT, pursuant to MN Statute 169.14, conduct a traffic investigation including speed studies on Summit Avenue between Hummingbird Lane and Murray Hill Road to determine the appropriate speed limits and provide the results to the City of Shorewood. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD on this 12th day of May, 2014. Scott Zerby, Mayor Attest: Jean Panchyshyn, City Clerk #9C MEETING TYPE City of Shorewood Council Meeting Item Regular Meeting Title / Subject: Lake Minnetonka LRT Regional Trail Overpass of CSAH 19 Meeting Date: May 12, 2014 Prepared by: Paul Hornby Reviewed by: Attachments: 95% Plan Review Letter — WSB 95% Plan Review Response Letter — SRF Partial final plan sheets Background: Three Rivers Park District has been working on plans for the construction of an overpass for the Lake Minnetonka LRT Regional Trail. In April of 2013, City staff met with representatives from Three Rivers Park District, the Districts consultant, Hennepin County, and Tonka Bay to discuss the project during the preliminary phase of the final design. The meeting was held, in part, to discuss the project and City and County items associated with the project. City staff provided an opinion to the Park District that accommodations for access needed to address the potential for surface crossing and the LRT trail connect to CSAH 19. Staff comments included: 1. There is potential for surface crossing of CSAH 19 after construction of the overpass due to the length of the local access ramps (portion of the trail from the surface of CSAH 19 to the LRT trail). a. Due to the long access ramps (400 to 500 feet) pedestrians are likely to cross CSAH 19 to access the trail in the direction they plan to travel. 2. The CSAH 19 "refuge median" should remain in place for pedestrian safety. 3. Other alternatives for access to the LRT Trail should be reviewed and discussed with the City. In April of 2014, the City received plans at 95% completion to review and provide comments to the District. The items discussed in our earlier meeting noted above were not addressed. Our review comments of the 95% design plan reflected the City concerns were not addressed. City staff recently received 100% complete plans for the purpose of bidding. The items noted above and in our 95% plan review were not addressed. I have discussed the items with the Park District, and due to limitations in right of way, and the potential for LRT use of the corridor, the plan includes grading and landscaping to discourage surface crossing of CSAH 19. At this time, The Three Rivers Park District is requesting City approval of the plans by signature on the plan title sheet. This is a common method used to show the City has reviewed and approves the plans. Mission Statement: The City of Shorewood is committed to providing residents quality public services, a healthy environment, a variety of attractive amenities, a sustainable tax base, and sound financial management through effective, efficient, and visionary leadership. Page 1 Options: The Park District can move forward with this project without City consent. The following options should be considered by the City Council in review of this project: 1. Council approves plans and authorizes staff to approve plans by signature of the title sheet. 2. Council approves plans and authorizes staff to approve plans by signature of the title sheet and monitor the surface crossing after construction of the overpass. 3. Council selects Option 1 or 2 above and authorizes staff to prepare a letter to the Park District of our concern for pedestrian surface crossing safety and the need for a surface crossing with the project. 4. Other Options discussed by Council Recommendation / Action Requested: Staff recommends Council approves the plans as stated in Option 3, and authorizes staff to prepare a letter to the Park District indicating concern for pedestrian surface crossing safety. ",dz car .rV ssrrc «r7es, fnc. engineering -planning- environ men tat -cons t uct'iev 477 Temperance Street St. Paul, MN 55101 Tel : 651 - 286 -8450 Fax 651-286-8488 April 14, 2014 Mr. Casey Black, P.E. SRF Consulting Group, Inc. One Carlson Parkway North, Suite 150 Minneapolis, MN 55447 Re: SP 091 - 090 -072 Lake Minnetonka LRT Regional Trail Bridge over CSAH 19 City of Shorewood, MN WSB Project No. 01459 -90 Dear Mr. Black, Thank you for the opportunity to review the 95% plans for the Lake Minnetonka LRT Regional Trail Bridge over CSAH 19. City staff has reviewed the plans as you requested, and have the following comments. 1. City staff previously met with representatives of Three Rivers Park District, SRF and staff from Tonka Bay to discuss some of the features of the project, at that time, in the preliminary design phase. There was much discussion regarding the removal of the center "Pedestrian Refuge" median from CSAH 19. City of Shorewood staff was concerned about the following: a. Pedestrians will continue to cross CSAH 19 at the surface instead of walking 500 feet to the east to access the trail, and then walk 500 feet back west to cross the roadway. b. Alternative access to the LRT trail should be reviewed and presented as part of the preliminary design phase of the project. c. We suggest that the access alternatives be reviewed with City staff and that the Park District present the proposed project to the City Council for comments. 2. The City bituminous walk on CSAH 19 right of way and Xcel Energy easement south approach was constructed as an interim section between the Xcel Energy access to the LRT trail. It was anticipated that the interim portion crossing the storm water spillway would be impacted and reconstructed as part of the Three Rivers Park District LRT Trail Overpass project. We request that the interim trail segment over the spillway be reconstructed as part of this project. 3. The catch basin structure and pipe outlet discharging to the east to the LRT Trail south ditch is in poor condition. We suggest that Three Rivers Park District and Hennepin County review the storm drain condition and capacity and consider reconstructing the storm drain and spillway with this project to reduce reconstruction after this improvement project. St. Cloud • Minneapolis • St. Paul Equal Opportunity Employer wsbeng.com K:\ 07459- 900 \AdmIn \Does \LTR -PTII SRF- 041414 -Lake Min no ton ka LRT 1 9 5 95 -plan review.docx Mr. Casey Black April 14, 2014 Page 2 Please do not hesitate to contact me directly with any questions or comments you may have regarding the City of Shorewood's staff review of this project plan. Sincerely, Paul Nornby, P.E. City Engineer Copy: Larry Brown, P.E., Director of Public Works Brad Nielsen, Director of Planning Bill Joynes, Administrator I K:\ 07459- 900 \AdmIn \Docs \LTR -PTII SRF 041414 - Lake Min no ton ka LRT Trail 95 -plan revi -docx Mav 2, 2014 Mr. Paul Hornby, PE Municipal Senior Project 1lanager NVSB & AssO CI RTES, INC. 477 Temperance Street St. Paul, 1IN 55101 SRF No. 0138038 0020 SUBJECT: SP 091 - 090 -072 THE L - uF MINNETOMLA LRT REGIONAL TRAIL BRIDGE ( ER CS AH 19 (NIANITOU ROAD) FOR THREE RIVERS PARK DISTRICT Dear. 1Ir. Hornby: Thank you for submitting comments with your letter dated April 14, 2014, regarding the 95"o plan for the trail and bridge project. It is my understanding that _ilex 1leyer, with the Three Rivers Parr District (TRPD), has spoken with you regarding your first comment stq �gesting that local access connection options be reviewed with City- staff. _ilex has been reviewing with TRPD staff the possibility of presenting project information at an upcoming informational open house. Related to your second and third comments regarding the bituminous wall; constnicted by the City- in 2013 and the catch basin stnicture, the TRPD will be collecting additional survey data at these locations to determine the as -built condition. Surrey for the regional trail and bridge project was completed prior to the construction of the City trail. Once collection of additional field information is complete, it is anticipated that the TRPD and SRF will review with local agencies the conditions for consideration of possible improvements to be incorporated into the project after the project letting and start of constntction. We request that if as -built plans were completed after the construction of the City trail connection to the TRPD regional trail, that these documents be made available to assist in determining the final trail and catch basin conditions. Sincerely SRF CONSULTING GROLT, INC. Gases- E. Black, PE (1IN ND NVI) _associate CEB /bls cc: Alex Meyer — Three Rivers Park District H:APaojects \80�8\ <; oaae�ondence\ Lette; s\ 7F0502_ PHoaraby _SboaeiroodCoa�a�ents.doch One Cao°kon Raokway North,, Suite 11,0 1 Minne apre >Ir , MN 5,447- 4443 1 763.475.0010 i ax 763.475 2429 An Uquaab t,)b loortu pity U nab hover E NGIN64 RS P° Q �M..NNCRS D b.S'I( NF. RS Consulting Girouaipr, Inc. Mav 2, 2014 Mr. Paul Hornby, PE Municipal Senior Project 1lanager NVSB & AssO CI RTES, INC. 477 Temperance Street St. Paul, 1IN 55101 SRF No. 0138038 0020 SUBJECT: SP 091 - 090 -072 THE L - uF MINNETOMLA LRT REGIONAL TRAIL BRIDGE ( ER CS AH 19 (NIANITOU ROAD) FOR THREE RIVERS PARK DISTRICT Dear. 1Ir. Hornby: Thank you for submitting comments with your letter dated April 14, 2014, regarding the 95"o plan for the trail and bridge project. It is my understanding that _ilex 1leyer, with the Three Rivers Parr District (TRPD), has spoken with you regarding your first comment stq �gesting that local access connection options be reviewed with City- staff. _ilex has been reviewing with TRPD staff the possibility of presenting project information at an upcoming informational open house. Related to your second and third comments regarding the bituminous wall; constnicted by the City- in 2013 and the catch basin stnicture, the TRPD will be collecting additional survey data at these locations to determine the as -built condition. Surrey for the regional trail and bridge project was completed prior to the construction of the City trail. Once collection of additional field information is complete, it is anticipated that the TRPD and SRF will review with local agencies the conditions for consideration of possible improvements to be incorporated into the project after the project letting and start of constntction. We request that if as -built plans were completed after the construction of the City trail connection to the TRPD regional trail, that these documents be made available to assist in determining the final trail and catch basin conditions. Sincerely SRF CONSULTING GROLT, INC. Gases- E. Black, PE (1IN ND NVI) _associate CEB /bls cc: Alex Meyer — Three Rivers Park District H:APaojects \80�8\ <; oaae�ondence\ Lette; s\ 7F0502_ PHoaraby _SboaeiroodCoa�a�ents.doch One Cao°kon Raokway North,, Suite 11,0 1 Minne apre >Ir , MN 5,447- 4443 1 763.475.0010 i ax 763.475 2429 An Uquaab t,)b loortu pity U nab hover av a° VIN NQ X 0 100 200 scale in feet C44 C47 C53 m NON m rL TEMP. DETOUR (DETO1) Ii TRAIL (LMLRT) - BEGIN S.P. 091 - 090 -072 (L TRAIL (LMLRT) STA. 100 +96.9 (L LOCAL ACCESS (PRKO2) LOCAL ACCESS (PRKO1) N i / (E TEMP. DETOUR (DET02 ) (L TRAIL (LMLRT) . C30 C45 C48 (L CSAH 19 \\ \\ L (MANITOU) \ \ \ j (L LOCAL \ ACCESS (SHRWD) LOCAL ACCESS (SHRWD) GIDEON BAY i C31 C46 C49 C55 CL LOCAL ACCESS _ (BAYO1) END S.P. 091 - 090 -072 (� TRAIL (LMLRT) STA. 119 +05.2 r�G ra��ia C-TJ e� LEGEND XXX TRAIL DETOUR PLAN SHEET NO. <e> REMOVAL PLAN SHEET NO. XXX CONSTRUCTION PLAN SHEET NO. XXX EROSION CONTROL AND TURF ESTABLISHMENT PLAN SHEET NO. INPLACE ROADWAY PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION x xxx xxx xxxxx Ihereby certify that this pon,speclflcatian,on eport was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and STATE PROJECT NO. 091 - 090 -072 DRAWN BY C. BLACK THREE R I V E R S PARK D I S T R I C T S H E E T that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer untler E N GIN E E R S UDA1111XIX store oCASEY aE. DEC. �� P LAN N E R S GENERAL LAYOUT C2 Print Name: BLACK BLACCKBY CHECKED BY ,� D E S I G N E R S LAKE MINNETONKA LRT REGIONAL TRAIL OF NO CKD APPR REVISION 49163 Consulting Group, Inc. S.P. 091- 090 -072 C7O .. \CAD _BIM \Plan \3038- g[01.dgn Date License ^ COMMli NORSOM380IR a N \ X LEGEND KETBALL PARKING \ °y 0 CLEAR & GRUB TREES AS NEEDED TO COURT LOT oyp EXIST. R/W �U' CONSTRUUCTIONRAICONFIRM RWITH qy ENGINEER PRIOR TO REMOVAL. REMOVE PAVEMENT REMOVE AGGREGATE TRAIL (6" COMMON EXCAVATION) OI y A / aNp 0 30 6a REMOVE MEDIAN (ISLAND REFUGE) J C -201 rA 1 0 MILL BITUMINOUS SURFACE (2.0 ") r JDI © ; _1 G , '\ _&? scale In feet REMOVE BITUMINOUS CURB BU —T_ 13- �� f PAVEMENT MARKING REMOVAL E �r , K 7 v�� EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY _ NoR HROP A o - - - - -- CONSTRUCTION LIMITS (L LOCAL `� � 0 o \ c WETLAND BOUNDARY ACCESS �-� 7 / m F'E�+'�C�i °�— S v / © Gp F (PRK02) �� �-( LP t) � � I �' SNP � w 6 GENERAL NOTES: '/' /��i ���'� `♦ SEE SHEET C1 FOR UTILITY LEGEND. HENNEPIN COUNTY REGIONAL RAILROAD AUTHORITY i / ♦ w PROPERTY BOUNDARY MARKERS SHALL REMAIN UNDISTURBED. CONTRACTOR SHALL SALVAGE AND ° LP \ \ FORNEURTO THERLRODEUHOTYPIFTOR RTNTEAIAATRI B DISTURBANCE IS DETERMINED TO BE NECESSARY FOR �/ � / TRAIL AND GIDEON BAY NS LL B CONSIDERED CONSTRUCTION. / o N Ir n/ HOCKEY WL PPROX o i I / RINK �? / P 56MEN� EXIST. R/W ti NOTESs In 1 �/ 6P V Q RELOCATE UTILITY BY OTHERS PRIOR ° 1 LOCAL ACCESS / TEMP. v -� TO CONSTRUCTION, SEE SHEET C11 \ \\ (PRKO1) EASEMENT Q ® OH P5 (L DETOUR \\ \ O (DET02) EXIST. R/W © SAWCUT BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH) \ \ 7/ K z \ \ ' C -202 9NIX (SOD) - Z © SALVAGE SIGN © lIVN1 G = QD REMOVE CONCRETE PARKING STOPS m G� U \ EXIST. GH c G o r \ \\�S y TEMP. BIT. CURB BRENTWOOD AVE. E E REMOVE WOOD POST \\ ` MJM PROPERTIES LLC EASEMENT EXIST. _ _ _ oyP I \\ \ © \ BIT. CURB - _ _ _ -T -BUR T -B R OF REMOVE CHAIN LINK FENCE C -203 C -204 / J END MILL OHP - Z © G. P 0 � +83.7 -206 ❑ OHP © REMOVE WOOD FENCE \•.'•.'• :,,•: •.'\ � w off C ;•.\ + C -202 TE �:::::.•.:.:1 o w Z� a P C TRAIL RELOCATE GATE (CHAIN LINK) \• :'•.'• :'•.'�'•1 � L n7 � 9NIX 1; : •.'• •: •:y u> a R �+ uval (LMLRT ) D L P + OH P4 TEMP. JO PROTECT AND MAINTAIN EXISTING TONKA BAY B R + A SIGN AND LANDSCAPING 00 ;'.... ;•.;.; `+ + C -205 EASEMENT �.. + + ::T'V ••;;:•;:;;: ;; ; �© Z QK REMOVE PAVEMENT MARKINGS FOR BIKE �] » w r .. •. ' .': •:'•:'•:.., .• .• .• .• + E F >> O V) DETOUR CROSSING - - „ } g• P w © REMOVE PAVEMENT MARKINGS AFTER BIKE DETOUR CROSSING IS REMOVED 112 + - �� - - —_ REMOVE PAVEMENT MARKINGS TO END OF TAPER • • .. 1++ ++ � 33 CONSTRUCTION C -206 r '= ''- QN REMOVE CONCRETE CURB © N LIMITS C -205 POST O �° L` 1 _ © REMOVE DELINEATOR (MEDIAN REFUGE) - ©� ONLY ++ P + J x _ METRO TRANSIT BUS STOP. FOR ADDITIONAL -F _ _ - + I" ! 0203 XC INFORMATION, SEE SHEET C11 EXISTING + EXIST. R/W AGG. TRAIL `+ o �. CSAH 19 , �' LOCAL ACCESS ® RELOCATE MAIL BOX AND SUPPORT DURING E TRAIL ( MAN ITOU) �( ++ + A TRAIL CONSTRUCTION OH P3 RING (SHRWD ) v XING + ++ ++ + +{ i + + ++ t + o C -202 EXISTING p `+ + C -202 C -204 © BIT. TRAIL \ ` OH P2 BEGIN MILL OH P1 Q A RAIL m +53.7 \\ © L \ HENA (\ © M C -201 'm X =1111EDXIX XXX XXX XXXXX I hereby certify that this plan, speciffcatlan, or report STATE PROJECT NO. DRAWN BY was prepared by me or under my direct s�pervislon and 091- 090 -072 THREE RIVERS PARK D I S T R I C T that I am a duly Licensed Prof...T al Englneer under C. BLACK SHEET the laws of the state of Minnesota. DESIGNED BY Prtnt Name: CASEY E. BLACK C. BLACK PLANNERS REMOVAL PLAN C45 CHECKED BY D E S I G N E R S LAKE MINNETONKA LRT REGIONAL TRAIL OF NO CKD APPR REVISION J. GERSEMA 49163 Consulting Group, Inc. S.P. 091 - 090 -072 C7O IM \Plan \8038_rem02.dgn Date License n COMM. NO. 0138038 a S m i 0 a i m U m 0 m a�u m .v o m a. i .ncx �i LEGEND BAS CO TBALL ` PARKING y 0/60 ` BIT. TRAIL, SEE INSET A SHEET C12 J \ EXIST U� ® AGG. TRAIL, SEE INSET B SHEET C12 . R/W ° .may / ® BIT. TRAIL, SEE INSET D SHEET C12 \\ T'e�R T d O H� % r r BIT. SURFACE FOR OVERLAY OR C -1 SEE INSET E SHEET C12 \\ `�s i- 6" CONCRETE WALK RIPRAP CLASS II, SEE SHEET C33 �C -1 \ ° 0 sa ea —XC —CHAIN LINK FENCE (60" HIGH) \ � r DI scale In feet J Y G Nq METAL RAILING TYPE 3, SEE SHEETC34 � o ` ` �t J O� -BU T -euH J�� v__v_ RET. WALL (SEE RETAINING WALL PLANS) EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY R =11 .O' �1 \ \ 7 NOR HRUP A o �° - - - - -- CONSTRUCTION LIMITS LOCAL N\\\ O O �h ° / WETLAND BOUNDARY \ H op 1 °Np SOIL BORING /CONE PENETRATION TEST Q ACCESS (PRK02) W'LP �� I / �GP an ® SETTLEMENT PLATE LP e \\ R =f1 0' -p �N w = i� �� \ w Ld ' / \ w NOTES: w , i��' ' / / Q1 N 0 CONSTRUCT BITUMINOUS CURB BETWEEN V) , i� P C -2 EXISTING SECTIONS AFTER DETOUR HAS BEEN REMOVED. MATCH EXISTING CURB RADIUS. J O /) 9 / C -2 ' \ `� GIDEON BAY © CONSTRUCT BITUMINOUS CURB BETWEEN EXISTING SECTIONS. z 0 j I L HOCKEY C -1 RINK -1 / / �\ © TIMBER POSTS 6 "x6" (DECORATIVE CEDAR) 1_ I / EXIST. R/W i` Lo 1 �/ / \ \ N QD CONSTRUCT PERPENDICULAR PEDESTRIAN CURB ° l q LOCAL ACCESS :' TEMP. \ v \ RAMP AS SHOWN ON STANDARD PLAN 5- 297.250 a �\ (PRKO1) /' EASEMENT \\ 0 '\ CL DETOUR (1 OF 5) WITH TRUNCATED DOMES. V \ A a.0' TRAIL D K (DET02) EXIST. R/W V) 0 E INSTALL CRUSHED ROCK CONSTRUCTION EXIT AS z \ \ _ _ _ z SHOWN ON STANDARD PLAN 5- 279.405 (5 OF 7) _j IN THIS PLAN. x \ \\ �� 5420 TEMP. © w \ Hp \ a BRENTWOOD AVE G G O CONCRETE PARKING STOPS EASEMENT o © TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION FENCE \ MJM PROPERTIES LLC, O - hP — n \\ \\ G A 9X = _T_B11R T -8 R \ 1 G +83.7 oHP� D P QH 4" DOUBLE SOLID LINE YELLOW -PAINT \ \ STORM -3 G QJ ' -7 \ \ (PRKO1) OH rrr C"? ❑ RETAINING WALL 'F' QJ 4" SOLID LINE WHITE -PAINT \ \ STA: 53 +86.48 OFFSET: 6.0' RT. f /r/ rif/ rr /ij P EXIST. TRAIL QK 4" SOLID LINE WHITE -PAINT FOR 18.0' LONG 1 11 INLET INV. R� r rrrr/ / /r /r/ s_ GATE (LMLRT) BY 9.0' WIDE PARKING STALL ELEV. 934.24 ! / / rr TEMP. 5 >> _ rr r r BUR r /Irr rrrrirr /!r x PIER EASEMENT Q CONTINUE PAINT STRIPING TO REMOVAL / r /r ! ! /i /q r PIER 6 APPROACH PANEL LIMITS >> CPT_ 1 >' - / SEE DETOUR PLANS FOR TEMPORARY DETOUR ST -3 xc SIGNAGE. I —� PIER 2 ST -2 I - - - - - G PLACE CLASS II CONSTRUCTION �\ of r! /ii `1 I _ _-- - - - - -- RIPRAP PER LIMITS PIER 3 PIER 4 r r /r /i Orr rrrr +68.8, 1 - _ 3133 AT OUTLET B \1 /Irr rrlrrj/ - -�� - - - +24.4 SIGNAGE NOTES: xc= x - - (D INSTALL NEW SIGN. 8.0' TRAIL c BRIDGE +47.6 ALL SIGNS SHALL CONFORM TO THE LATEST EXIST. R/W (. CSAH 19 \ r (E LOCAL ACCESS +57.6 #27692 (MANITOU) ! /rrrr /ir r!i/ r (SHRWD) 12' - 15" RCP ! q/ rrrr /j/ POSTS SHALL BE FLANGED CHANNEL STEEL, STORM -3 2.50% + 2 FES /i / /ri /b rrr / ol� 2.5 # /FT. IN ACCORDANCE WITH SPEC. 2564. (PRKO1) STA: 53+99.99 OFFSET: 5.9' LT. +53.7 RETAINING WALL 'D' OUTLET INV. ELEV. 933.64 EXIST. CITY n Q Q BIT. TRAIL J X Xx /XX /XX XXX XXX XXx XXX %% [hereby ce tify that this under my direct report 091 -090 002CT No. DRAWN BY THREE RIVERS PARK DISTRICT SHEET was prepared duly me or nder my direct s vervlsnd and C. BLACK that [ am a: licensed Pratessia "alELACKr under E N G I N E E R S Print Name: state oCASEYoE. BLACK DESIGNED C. BLACK PLANNERS CONSTRUCTION PLAN C48 CHECKED BY D E S I G N E R S LAKE MINNETONKA LRT REGIONAL TRAIL OF NO DATE BY CKD APPR REVISION J.GERSEMA ... \CAD_BIM \Plan \8038_cpO2.dgn Date License n 49163 COMM. N0. 0138038 Consulting Group, Inc. S.P. 091 - 090 -072 C70 a N I fli LEGEND ' BIT. TRAIL, SEE INSET A SHEET C12 ® AGG, TRAIL, SEE INSET B SHEET C12 © ® BIT. TRAIL, SEE INSET D SHEET C12 BIT. SURFACE FOR OVERLAY OR SEE INSET E SHEET C12 0 6" CONCRETE WALK RIPRAP CLASS II, SEE SHEET C33 I 0 30 60 — XC — CHAIN LINK FENCE (60" HIGH) scale in fleet �— +- METAL RAILING TYPE 3, SEE SHEETC34 OD V---j--RET. WALL (SEE RETAINING WALL PLANS) v EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY w - - - - -- CONSTRUCTION LIMITS = i WETLAND BOUNDARY w GIDEON BAY SOIL BORING /CONE PENETRATION TEST `) ® SETTLEMENT PLATE F- w J J_ NOTES; M �G� CONSTRUCT BITUMINOUS CURB BETWEEN a' , EXISTING SECTIONS AFTER DETOUR HAS BEEN r� REMOVED, MATCH EXISTING CURB RADIUS. N © CONSTRUCT BITUMINOUS CURB BETWEEN - - EXISTING SECTIONS. I a -- V) ------- i © CONSTRUCT CONCRETE CURB BETWEEN w I EXISTING SECTIONS AFTER DETOUR HAS BEEN z EXIST. R/W REMOVED. MATCH EXISTING CURB. J 2 _ Q CONSTRUCT PERPENDICULAR PEDESTRIAN CURB a O G BRENTWOOD AVE. _ (n RAMP AS SHOWN ON STANDARD PLAN 5- 297.250 G GG (1 OF 5) WITH TRUNCATED DOMES. _ — G CONSTRUCTION m QE INSTALL CRUSHED ROCK CONSTRUCTION EXIT AS G oHP SHOWN ON STANDARD PLAN 5-279.405 ( 5 OF 7 ) _ _ LIMITS —GH _ IN THIS PLAN. oliP��oHP�_ —dNP -BUR DI T RuR�� OF CONCRETE PARKING STOPS 15 TEMP. J &L DEVELOPMENT EASEMENT _ox �_ �p - © TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION FENCE r EXIST. R/W �ux � BHP T_ QH 4" DOUBLE SOLID LINE YELLOW -PAINT (L TRAIL LIMIT OF _ (LMLRT) RET, WALL 'E' HCRRA LAND 4" SOLID LINE WHITE —PAINT — >> 1 — >> x AGREEMENT w RET. WALL 'F' » MH 6-15V< (L LOCAL ACCES� I I C -1 Q 4" SOLID LINE WHITE -PAINT FOR 18,0' LONG +00.0 > V x _ LIMIT OF PRIVATE (BAY01) I I BY 9.0' WIDE PARKING STALL it II CPT- G n +21.1 _— LEASE AGREEMENT I II © CONTINUE PAINT STRIPING TO REMOVAL EXIST. R/W I I LIMITS +23,6 - x =_x( I 1 _ C O i Q1 2 QM TIMBER POSTS 6 "x6" (DECORATIVE CEDAR) - �I I 10.0' TRAIL SIGNAGEOUR PLANS FOR TEMPORARY DETOUR _ +73.fi _ xc R =20.0' _1200 +25.6' x _ C ; SIGNAGE NOTES: RET. WALL 'D' EXIST. R/W CONSTRUCTION 8' 10, _ j INSTALL NEW SIGN. �� _ � Q1 LIMITS n 10.0' S <s j ALL SIGNS SHALL CONFORM TO THE LATEST c \\ 1 VERSION OF THE MMUTCD. q LOCAL ACCESS _ I POSTS SHALL BE FLANGED CHANNEL STEEL, EXISTING (SHRWD) a AGG. TRAIL , 2.5 # /FT. IN ACCORDANCE WITH SPEC, 2564. o _ 5505 O XCEL ENERGY © a O z C -2 C -1 mom= i END S.P. 091 - 090 -072 C -3 (l TRAIL (LMLRT) STA. 119 +05.2 X XX/XX/XXI XXX XXX AAPPR XXXXX I hereby certlfy that this plan, speciflcatlon, or report STATE PROJECT NO. DRAWN BY SHEET o was prepared by e or under my drrect pervislon and 051 -090 -072 C. BLACK THREE RIVERS PARK DISTRICT that I duly Licensed Protesstonal Engineer under . E N G I N E E R S the laws of the State of Minnesota- DESIGNED BY �� C 4 9 S v Pr nt Name: CASEY E. BLACK C. BLACK P L A N N E R S CONSTRUCTION PLAN �a CHECKED BY D E SIGNER S LAKE MINNETONKA LRT REGIONAL TRAIL OF �a NO =11ATEBY CKD REVI SION J. GERSEMA x ... \CAD _BIM \Plan \8038 _cp03. dgn Date License tt 49163 COMM. N0. 0136038 Consulting Group, Inc. S.P. 091 - 090 -072 C70 M m 0 787' - 107/8' (OUT -TO -OUT OF SLAB) 2' -4" 105' -81 /2' 106' -5" 92' -5" 106' -5" r RET. WALL 'C' \" "Y`_'_ / (SPAN 1) c CE BRG. WEST ABUTMENT (SPAN 2) b \ (SPAN 3) (SPAN 4) 960 _ 950 940 930 920 c i a 0 i c C 0 •aI LOCAL ACCESS � ( RKOD G- -CE PIER 2 PIER 3 PIER 1-{ W.P. 'B' \� I W.P. ' W.P. 'D' W.P. 'E' W.P. 'K' 0 W.P. 'L' W.P. 'M' W.P. N. TOYP.) W.P. 'T' \ a W.P. 'V' W.P. 'W' W.P. U.N.O. au 1' b - -- - - - -- - _ 106 - 107 108 - - - - - -A - - - - - - - - - - - I - - - - - - - - - - -L -AZ =9157'43.1'• \-B.M. �� 14' -4" ✓ W.P. 'A' BEGIN BRIDGE W.P. 'J' STA. 104 +59.70 EL. 941.41 WP. 'S' PT. "C" �� STA. 106 +61.90 = CE LOCAL ACCESS (PRKO1) 104 -- 105- STA. 53+82.89 (BACK FACE) X51 - - -)- --- - - - - -- 52 - - - -L -- 960 _ 950 940 930 920 c i a 0 i c C 0 •aI LOCAL ACCESS � ( RKOD G- -CE PIER 2 PIER 3 PIER 1-{ W.P. 'B' \� I W.P. ' W.P. 'D' W.P. 'E' W.P. 'K' 0 W.P. 'L' W.P. 'M' W.P. N. TOYP.) W.P. 'T' \ a W.P. 'V' W.P. 'W' W.P. U.N.O. au 1' b - -- - - - -- - _ 106 - 107 108 - - - - - -A - - - - - - - - - - - I - - - - - - - - - - -L -AZ =9157'43.1'• \-B.M. �� 14' -4" CONTROL POINT: DISK TRAIL (LMLRT) & WORKING LINE VERT. CLR. TRAIL (LMLRT) RET. WALL 'A' PT. "C" �� STA. 106 +61.90 = CE LOCAL ACCESS (PRKO1) RET. WALL 'B' PVI EL. 965.92 STA. 53+82.89 (BACK FACE) PVC STA. 114 +21.08 114+ 135 X= 445783.135 CSAH 19 / Y= 141708.045 PVI STA. 104 +35.08 PVI EL. 940.02 100.00' V. C. M = +0.625' G1 = +0.007 PVC STA. 103 +85.08 PVC EL. 940.02 RET. WALL 'A' OR 'C' (BF WALL 'C' SHOWN) PVT STA. 104 +85.08 PVT EL. 942.52 iT{It]II I11FL1�J19.fi -' -_ - _ WEST ABUTMENT PIER �- PIER 4 r c VERT. CLR. PT. "A" 109 - - 160' -2" 14' -4" 106' -5" 105' -8%', 1 2' -4" X (SPAN 5) = G2 +0.00% (SPAN 6) (SPAN 7) VERTICAL CLEAR PVI EL. 965.92 VERTICAL CLEAR TYPE 2 AL 2" (TYPJ PVC STA. 114 +21.08 114+ TO CURB I (LMLRT) CSAH 19 220.00' V.C. POINT NITOU) _ VERTICAL CLEAR METAL RAILING = 17' -9T /8' PVC STA. 108 +43 O8 M = -2.75' 3 �'• � �-- -� PIER 5 PIER 6 -A BRG. E. ABUT. TYPE 1 (TYPJ PVC EL 960.42 W.P. 'F' PVT EL. 960 42 W.P. 'G' W.P. W P 'H' ET. WALL 'F' = 10 /8' Wi P. iP' v W.P. '0' 'Z' W.P. 'R' � r f W.P. 'Y' `� J I P.C. W.P. 'AA' I END BRIDGE a� ;,a it :.. �. . _,, .. ._. _ _ r WORKING W.P. STA. 112 +47.58 (SPAN 3) F F- 110 XC 111 LINE 112 EL. 951.19 - 1- - - L - - - -- - - --- - - _ _ _ _ _ 113 - -L ANITOU) _ �A EL. 927.71 � LOCAL ---] _ - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - EL. 929.92 EL. 931.87 EL. 934.04 I EC. 933.99 - -- -- - EL.933.92 -- 1 I 0 t47' -91/' 17' 11' 20' ±47' -01 /Z' PT. " B" CONTROL POINT: \ _ P.C. EXIST. TRAIL � TRAIL (LMLRT) TO BE REMOVED. STA. 109 +53.08 = 70 ° -18'- 35.7" BRIDGE NAMEPLATE SEE GRADING CE CSAH 19 (MANITOU) PLANS. STA. 20 +65.40 0 � -� CITY TRAIL B.M. DISK X= 446074.146 HRWD) RET. WALL 'D' Y= 141698.076 1 GENERAL PLAN PVI STA. 114 +71.08 0 60 PVI EL. 940.02 SCALE' 100.00' V.C. M = +0.625' PROFILE GRADE @ 14' -4" PVI STA 109 +5308 . . METAL RAILING = G2 +0.00% TRAIL (PLMLRT) 6' -0" 6' -0" VERTICAL CLEAR PVI EL. 965.92 VERTICAL CLEAR TYPE 2 AL 2" (TYPJ PVC STA. 114 +21.08 114+ TO CURB I (LMLRT) POINT "A" 220.00' V.C. POINT PVC EL.. VERTICAL CLEAR METAL RAILING = 17' -9T /8' PVC STA. 108 +43 O8 M = -2.75' 3 = 17'-95/8' PVT STA. 110 +63.08 RET. WALL 'D' OR 'F' 'F' PVT STA. 115 +21.OB PVT EL. 940.02 POINT MIN° TYPE 1 (TYPJ PVC EL 960.42 PVT EL. 960 42 (BF WALL SHOWN) = 10 /8' a °�� - , � r 2.0% I cu lV +5"0 0% -..,_ .,�. - -- .. _ ' -* I i� .:: -� ;,a it :.. �. . _,, .. ._. _ _ -- _I _ _ 5.00% 36M PRESTRESSED (SPAN 3) F F- SPAN 4) E F 2 (SPAN 5) F CSAH 19 (SPAN 6) F F - (SPAN 2) F F - - --- - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _� _ _! - -L ANITOU) (SPAN 7) E EL. 927.71 � LOCAL ---] _ - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - EL. 929.92 EL. 931.87 EL. 934.04 I EC. 933.99 - -- -- - EL.933.92 -- 1 I ACCESS t47' -91/' 17' 11' 20' ±47' -01 /Z' EL. 934.50 F HANDRAIL (PRKO1) O O O O O PROFILE I (TYP.) 1 PIER 2 PIER 3 PIER 4 PIER 5 PIER 6 EAST ABUTMENT GENERAL ELEVATION (PLMLRT) 0 60 m I o n SCALE ' > UU14U. )LH❑ FLOOR BEAM NORTH SIDE TRANSVERSE BRIDGE SECTION (SPAN 5 - MIDSPAN) oa` NO ' DATE BY CKD APPR v� ix .. \Plans \Final \8038_gpeO1 ... �nr<�r I ans �r I na I Sawa _anew . aan TOP CHORD :TYP J VERTICAL OR ]IAGONAL (TYP.) METAL RAILING TYPE 2 P 4' -6" MIN. HEIGHT TO TOP OF TOP RAIL FROM TOP OF SLAB NAVE PLATES (TYP.) 3RIDGE MOUNTED SIGN TYPE D (TYP.) BOTTOM CHORD (TYP.) SOUTH SIDE 14' -4" V -2" 12' -0" (CLEAR WIDTH) V -2" 13' -71/2" (DECK) 6' -0" 6' -0" 2" (TYP.) I TRAIL � -� 2" (TYPJ 12' -0" (CLEAR WIDTH) TO CURB I (LMLRT) 6' -0" 6' -0" LEVEL (TYP.) PROFILE HANDRAIL 2" (TYP.) r -� TRAIL o GRADE (TYP.) METAL RAILING z TYPE 1 (TYP.) TO CURB I (LMLRT) a ' � r 2.0% I cu lV a ~ a C MIN. I 36M PRESTRESSED � 0 I o SLOPE BOTTOM TO MATCH DECK NORTH SIDE 3' -5" 7' -6" 3' -5" SOUTH SIDE -- i w :2E CL I I F HANDRAIL a PROFILE I (TYP.) iv �13 m GRADE - (PLMLRT) ' V, m I o n J > 2.OX I ~ 0 7" MIN. REINF. UU14U. )LH❑ FLOOR BEAM NORTH SIDE TRANSVERSE BRIDGE SECTION (SPAN 5 - MIDSPAN) oa` NO ' DATE BY CKD APPR v� ix .. \Plans \Final \8038_gpeO1 ... �nr<�r I ans �r I na I Sawa _anew . aan TOP CHORD :TYP J VERTICAL OR ]IAGONAL (TYP.) METAL RAILING TYPE 2 P 4' -6" MIN. HEIGHT TO TOP OF TOP RAIL FROM TOP OF SLAB NAVE PLATES (TYP.) 3RIDGE MOUNTED SIGN TYPE D (TYP.) BOTTOM CHORD (TYP.) SOUTH SIDE TRANSVERSE BRIDGE SECTION (SPANS 1, 2, 3. 4, 6 & 7) I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report STATE PROJECT NO. DRAWN BY was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and 091 - 090 -072 A. HAUSER . that I a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under Ll E N G I N E E R S the laws s Minn of the State of Minnesota. DESIGNED BY Print Name: EY E. BLACK C. BLACK PLANNERS Qf BRIDGE NO. CHECKED BY D E S I G N E R S Date 4/28/14 License R 49163 27B92 COMM. N0. 0138038 Consulting Group, Inc. NOTES: 1. E DENOTES EXPANSION BEARING F DENOTES FIXED BEARING BF DENOTES BACK FACE U.N.O. DENOTES UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE 2O BRIDGE MOUNTED SIGN TYPE D ON EACH SIDE OF TRUSS. O3 WAVE PLATES, SEE PREFABRICATED TRUSS DETAILS. O4 MEASURED PERPENDICULAR TO (� CSAH 19 (MANITOU). OS 12' -0" TRAIL CLEAR WIDTH IS MEASURED BETWEEN HANDRAILS. CLEAR WIDTH FROM FACE -TO -FACE OF CURB IS 11' -8" TO A HEIGHT OF B" ABOVE TOP OF DECK. 6. SEE RETAINING WALL PLANS FOR RETAINING WALL DETAILS. THREE RIVERS PARK DISTRICT SHEET LAKE MINNETONKA LRT REGIONAL TRAIL BRIDGE B2 OVER CSAH 19 (MANITOU ROAD) OF GENERAL PLAN AND ELEVATION B52 14' -4" V -2" 12' -0" (CLEAR WIDTH) V -2" 6' -0" 6' -0" 2" (TYP.) I TRAIL � -� 2" (TYPJ TO CURB I (LMLRT) LEVEL (TYP.) PROFILE HANDRAIL o GRADE (TYP.) METAL RAILING (PLMLRT) I TYPE 1 (TYP.) ' � r 2.0% I cu lV a ~ a I 7" DECK MIN. I 36M PRESTRESSED CONC. BEAM (TYP.) SLOPE BOTTOM TO MATCH DECK NORTH SIDE 3' -5" 7' -6" 3' -5" SOUTH SIDE TRANSVERSE BRIDGE SECTION (SPANS 1, 2, 3. 4, 6 & 7) I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report STATE PROJECT NO. DRAWN BY was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and 091 - 090 -072 A. HAUSER . that I a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under Ll E N G I N E E R S the laws s Minn of the State of Minnesota. DESIGNED BY Print Name: EY E. BLACK C. BLACK PLANNERS Qf BRIDGE NO. CHECKED BY D E S I G N E R S Date 4/28/14 License R 49163 27B92 COMM. N0. 0138038 Consulting Group, Inc. NOTES: 1. E DENOTES EXPANSION BEARING F DENOTES FIXED BEARING BF DENOTES BACK FACE U.N.O. DENOTES UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE 2O BRIDGE MOUNTED SIGN TYPE D ON EACH SIDE OF TRUSS. O3 WAVE PLATES, SEE PREFABRICATED TRUSS DETAILS. O4 MEASURED PERPENDICULAR TO (� CSAH 19 (MANITOU). OS 12' -0" TRAIL CLEAR WIDTH IS MEASURED BETWEEN HANDRAILS. CLEAR WIDTH FROM FACE -TO -FACE OF CURB IS 11' -8" TO A HEIGHT OF B" ABOVE TOP OF DECK. 6. SEE RETAINING WALL PLANS FOR RETAINING WALL DETAILS. THREE RIVERS PARK DISTRICT SHEET LAKE MINNETONKA LRT REGIONAL TRAIL BRIDGE B2 OVER CSAH 19 (MANITOU ROAD) OF GENERAL PLAN AND ELEVATION B52 #10A MEETING TYPE City of Shorewood Council Meeting Item Regular Meeting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Title / Subject: Proposed Change to the South Lake Minnetonka Police Department Joint Powers Agreement Meeting Date: May 12, 2014 Prepared by: Bill Joynes, City Administrator Background: You will find attached a Memorandum from Chief Litsey describing a proposed amendment to our Joint Powers Agreement for the South Lake Minnetonka Police Department that was discussed at the last Coordinating Committee meeting and is forwarded for your consideration. The vote to send it forward was 3 -1 with Shorewood in opposition. The change would allow the annual budget to be approved on a simple majority vote thus requiring 3 of the 4 cities to approve instead of the current unanimous consent requirement. This might seem reasonable if all four cities paid an equal share of the costs for the Department. This is not the case and in a worst case scenario, the amendment would allow the other three cities to dictate to us annual expenditures of our funds. The Mayor and City Attorney have reviewed this and will have additional comments. Mission Statement: The City of Shorewood is committed to providing residents quality public services, a healthy environment, a variety of attractive amenities, a sustainable tax base, and sound financial management through effective, efficient, and visionary leadership. Page 1 t SOUTH LAKE MINNETONKA POLICE DEPARTMENT Serving Excelsior, Greenwood, Shorewood and Tonka Bay 24150 Smithtown Road Shorewood, Minnesota 55331 MEMORANDUM BRYAN LITSEY Chief of Police Office (952) 474 -3261 Fax (952) 474 -4477 TO: Kristi Luger, Excelsior City Manager Dana Young, Deephaven City Administrator Representing City of Greenwood Bill Joynes, Shorewood City Administrator Joe Kohlmann, Tonka Bay City Administrator FROM: Bryan Litsey, Chief of Police DATE: April 16, 2014 - Wednesday RE: Joint Powers Agreement (JPA) Proposed Change - Approval of the Annual Operating Budget As you are aware, one of the topics discussed at the Special Coordinating Committee Meeting on April 15, 2014 was a proposed change to the Joint Powers Agreement (JPA) in which approval of the Annual Operating Budget would only need three member cities (majority) to agree rather than all four member cities (unanimous). This way at least two member cities would have to disagree with the proposed budget before reverting to the JPA default provision. Attached are the corresponding packet materials provided for that meeting. This includes suggested language for the JPA that reflects the proposed change. A motion was made at the end of the discussion by Committee members recommending adoption of the change and sending it to the member city councils for their consideration. Motion passed on a 3 -1 vote. The abovementioned action by the Coordinating Committee is now being forwarded to you as the administrator /manager for your city. It would be much appreciated if you could have your city council take up this matter as soon as possible since it has a bearing on the upcoming budget process for the next fiscal year. The proposed change needs to be approved by a majority vote of each city council before it would take effect as an amendment to the JPA. Please keep me posted on how this matter is tracking with your city council. SOUTH LAKE MINNETONKA POLICE DEPARTMENT Serving Excelsior, Greenwood, Shorewood and Tonka Bay 24150 Smithtown Road Shorewood, Minnesota 55331 MEMORANDUM BRYAN LITSEY Chief of Police Office (952) 474 -3261 Fax (952) 474 -4477 TO: Kristi Luger, Excelsior City Manager Dana Young, Deephaven City Administrator Representing City of Greenwood Bill Joynes, Shorewood City Administrator Joe Kohlmann, Tonka Bay City Administrator FROM: Bryan Litsey, Chief of Police DATE: April 16, 2014 - Wednesday RE: Joint Powers Agreement (JPA) Proposed Change - Approval of the Annual Operating Budget As you are aware, one of the topics discussed at the Special Coordinating Committee Meeting on April 15, 2014 was a proposed change to the Joint Powers Agreement (JPA) in which approval of the Annual Operating Budget would only need three member cities (majority) to agree rather than all four member cities (unanimous). This way at least two member cities would have to disagree with the proposed budget before reverting to the JPA default provision. Attached are the corresponding packet materials provided for that meeting. This includes suggested language for the JPA that reflects the proposed change. A motion was made at the end of the discussion by Committee members recommending adoption of the change and sending it to the member city councils for their consideration. Motion passed on a 3 -1 vote. The abovementioned action by the Coordinating Committee is now being forwarded to you as the administrator /manager for your city. It would be much appreciated if you could have your city council take up this matter as soon as possible since it has a bearing on the upcoming budget process for the next fiscal year. The proposed change needs to be approved by a majority vote of each city council before it would take effect as an amendment to the JPA. Please keep me posted on how this matter is tracking with your city council. TO: FROM: DATE: RE: SOUTH LAKE MINNETONKA POLICE DEPARTMENT Serving Excelsior, Greenwood, Shorewood and Tonka Bay 24150 Smithtown Road Shorewood, Minnesota 55331 MEMORANDUM Coordinating Committee Members Bryan Litsey, Chief of Police April 8, 2014 - Tuesday Joint Powers Agreement (JPA) Proposed Change - Approval of the Annual Operating Budget BRYAN LITSEY Chief of Police Office (952) 474 -3261 Fax (952) 474 -4477 As a result of the budget process last summer, new Coordinating Committee member and Tonka Bay Mayor Gerry De La Vega expressed concern with the stipulation in the Joint Powers Agreement (JPA) that requires unanimous approval of the Annual Operating Budget each year by all parties to the agreement. Although the default provision in the Fourth Amendment to the JPA softens the ramifications if unanimity cannot be achieved, Mayor De La Vega did not like the fact that one member city alone can force the budget process into default without at least one other member city agreeing. See Addendum A. He felt this was contrary to the spirit of the JPA and could be detrimental to the organization. He advocated a simple change to the JPA in which approval of the Annual Operating Budget would essentially only need three member cities (majority) to agree rather than all four member cities (unanimous). This way at least two member cities would have to disagree with the proposed budget before reverting to the default provision. This topic was added to the agenda for the Coordinating Committee Meeting held on November 13, 2013. Attached is the corresponding excerpt from the summary minutes for that meeting. See Addendum B. As a first step, staff was asked to draft suggested language for the JPA that reflects the aforementioned proposal by Mayor De La Vega and could be used as the basis for further discussion on this matter. In reviewing the Fourth Amendment to the JPA, it appears that the following simple changes to the second paragraph on page 5 would accomplish this objective. "The Approved Annual Operating Budget for each year shall be determined in advance by majori1y agreement of the Parties. If 17 a majority of the Parties do not agree on the Approved Annual Operating Budget by September 1 st of each year, the amount of the previous year's Approved Annual Operating Budget will be increased by the lesser of the following to arrive at the Approved Annual Operating Budget...." Attorney Kenneth Potts, who is general legal counsel for the SLMPD, has reviewed these changes and believes it achieves the stated objective of lessening the threshold for approval of the Annual Memorandum to Coordinating Committee Proposed JPA Change - Approval of the Annual Operating Budget Page 2 of 2 Operating Budget from unanimous to a majority of the member cities. A majority under the current makeup of the JPA requires at least three of the four member cities agreeing before it takes effect. Although it could be stated in this manner, the language being proposed would not have to be changed if other cities became part of the JPA at a future date. This is on the agenda for further discussion and direction at the Special Coordinating Committee Meeting scheduled for Tuesday, April 15, 2014. #12A.1 MEETING TYPE City of Shorewood Council Meeting Item Regular Meeting Title / Subject: Update on Country Club Road Speed Awareness Display Meeting Date: May 12, 2014 Prepared by: Larry Brown, Director of Public Works Reviewed by: Attachments Speed by Percent of Sample Points Policy Consideration: None Background: Attached is a graphic which shows a speed distribution, by percentage of traffic on Country Club Road from the dates of December 18, 2013 to May 8, 2014. As noted during the previous presentation of data for these signs, the signs do not sample each car that passes the sign. The signs record at constant intervals, versus events triggered by a vehicle. Staff is working with our Traffic Engineers at WSB and Associates to provide a more detailed report with individual traffic points. Questions as to how data is classified as a high and low point has prompted WSB and Associates to verify with the manufacturer some very detailed information. Our hope is to present this at Monday's City Council meeting. Mission Statement: The City of Shorewood is committed to providing residents quality public services, a healthy environment, a variety of attractive amenities, a sustainable tax base, and sound financial management through effective, efficient, and visionary leadership. Page 1 ............................. 90 80 P e 70 r c e 60 n t 50 0 f 40 V 0 30 U m 20 e 10 0 . .. .. . . . . . .. .. . . . . . .. .. .. . . . .. .. .. . . . . . .. .. .. . . . .. .. .. . . . . . .. .. .. . . . .. .. .. . . . . . .. .. .. . . . .. .. .. . . . . . .. .. .. . . . .. .. .. . . . . . .. .. .. . . . .. .. .. . . . . . .. .. . . . . . .. .. .. . . . . . .. .. . . . . . .. .. .. . . . . . .. .. . . . . . .. .. . Speed Distrubution Below 21 21 -26 27 -32 33 -38 39 -44 45 -50 51 -56 57 -62 63 -68 Above 69 Speed Range SOUTHBOUND TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION BY PERCENTAGES Highest Lowest .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... ............................... . Speed Distrubution 80 70 P e r 60 c e n 50 t 0 40 f V 30 0 I u 20 m e 10 0 ............................... Highest Lowest Ralnim 91 I 91 _ ?€. I 97_-�? I '�q_RR I RQ_dd I 44_4f1 I 41 _4F, I 47_F,? I F,q_F,R I Ahnwp F.Q