10-06-15 Planning Comm Mtg Agenda
CITY OF SHOREWOOD COUNCIL CHAMBERS
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD
TUESDAY, 6 OCTOBER 2015 7:00 P.M.
A G E N D A
CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL / (LIAISON) SCHEDULE
GENG (Sep) ______
MADDY (Oct) ______
BEAN (Dec) ______
JOHNSON (Jan) ______
DAVIS (Nov) ______
APPROVAL OF AGENDA
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
1 September 2015
1. 7:00 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING – C.U.P. for Accessory Space Over 1200 Sq. Ft.
Applicant: Stephen Ferraro
Location: 5645 Grant Lorenz Road
2. 7:10 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING – ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT REGARDING
SIGNS IN CEMETERIES
Applicant: Woodside Cemetery Association (Rep., Dan Randall)
Location: 27175 Smithtown Road
3. MINOR SUBDIVISION
Applicant: Thomas Wartman
Location: 26985 Edgewood Road
4. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR
5. OLD BUSINESS / NEW BUSINESS
6. DRAFT NEXT MEETING AGENDA
7. REPORTS
Liaison to Council
SLUC
Other
8. ADJOURNMENT
CITY OF SHOREWOOD COUNCIL CHAMBERS
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD
TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 1, 2015 7:00 P.M.
MINUTES
CALL TO ORDER
Chair Geng called the meeting to order at 7:00 P.M.
ROLL CALL
Present: Chair Geng; Commissioners Bean, Davis, Johnson and Maddy; Planning Director
Nielsen; and Council Liaison Woodruff
Absent: None
APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Commissioner Bean asked that Item 3.A City Right-of-Way be added to the agenda.
Bean moved, Davis seconded, approving the agenda for September 1, 2015, as amended. Motion
passed 5/0.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
August 18, 2015
Commissioner Davis stated that she assumes the minor changes submitted by Planning Commissioners to
staff will be made to the minutes.
Bean moved, Davis seconded, approving the Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of August 18,
2015, subject to staff incorporating the grammatical / typographical changes Planning
Commissioners submitted that staff deems appropriate. Motion passed 5/0.
1. PUBLIC HEARING –FRONT YARD SETBACK VARIANCE
Applicant: Wayne Hartmann and Michelle Letendre
Location: 27460 Maple Ridge Lane
Chair Geng opened the Public Hearing at 7:02 noting the procedures used in a Public Hearing. He
explained the Planning Commission is comprised of residents of the City of Shorewood who are serving
as volunteers on the Commission. The Commissioners are appointed by the City Council. The
Commission’s role is to help the City Council in determining zoning and planning issues. One of the
Commission’s responsibilities is to hold public hearings and to help develop the factual record for an
application and to make a non-binding recommendation to the City Council. The recommendation is
advisory only. He noted that if the Planning Commission makes a recommendation this evening this item
will go before the City Council on September 28, 2015. He stated this evening the Planning Commission
is going to consider a front yard setback variance for Wayne Hartmann and Michelle Letendre, for their
property located at 27460 Maple Ridge Lane.
CITY OF SHOREWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
September 1, 2015
Page 2 of 5
Director Nielsen reiterated Wayne Hartmann and Michelle Letendre own the property at 27460 Maple
Ridge Lane. He noted the property is located in the R-1A/S, Single-Family Residential/Shoreland District
and contains 42,359 square feet of area. It backs up to the channel on the north end of Lake Virginia. He
stated they propose to build a small addition on the southwesterly corner of their home. When the
applicants applied for a building permit they discovered their home is nonconforming with respect to the
front yard setback requirement for the R-1A/S District. Therefore, they are requesting a setback variance
for the addition.
He explained the existing house is located as close as 32 feet from the right-of-way (ROW) of Maple
Ridge Lane. The structure has a footprint area of 3,275 square feet, including the attached garage. The
197 square-foot addition would fill in the southwesterly corner of the house.
With regard to the analysis of the case, Nielsen explained the home was built in 1974. The building
permit indicated a 50-foot setback and that no variances would be necessary. The survey submitted with
the application contained a note regarding the 50-foot setback. Once built, the home ended up at
approximately 32 feet from the public ROW. The same type of error appears to have been made on
several homes in the immediate vicinity. Out of 10 houses on that west side of Lake Virginia Drive, eight
of them do not comply with the 50-foot front setback requirement. There is no record of any variances
having been granted for those properties. Staff speculated that whoever performed the inspections on
these homes may have been measuring from the traveled surface of the roadway instead of the public
ROW. All of the homes appear to be 50 feet or more from the pavement.
He reviewed how the applicant’s request for a variance complies with the criteria for variances set forth in
Section 1201.05 Subd. 2 of the Zoning Code.
1. The variance would not alter the essential character of the area in which it is located. Given the
number of homes similarly situated nearby, the proposed addition would be in keeping with the
homes in the neighborhood.
2. The need for the variance is not economic in nature. The applicants are not requesting the
variance because it is cheaper to build as they propose. They are trying to improve the functional
layout of the home.
3. Neither the applicants nor their predecessors created their practical difficulty. In fact, it could be
argued that the City did.
4. The addition would be of minimal size; it would fill in the corner of the home. Due to the way the
house angles away from the cul-de-sac, the addition would actually be four feet farther from the
front property line than the existing house. Once completed, the property would only have 18.3
percent hardcover; a maximum of 25 percent is allowed in the R-1A/S District.
Nielsen noted staff recommends the applicant’s request be granted as proposed. He also noted that Mr.
Hartmann was present.
Mr. Hartmann noted the home he currently lives in is his fifth home and this is the first time he has
requested a variance. He stated they could not find any documentation about why their home encroaches
into the 50-foot setback. He asked if a note would be put in the file for his property explaining the
anomaly of his property and others in the area regarding the setback encroachment.
CITY OF SHOREWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
September 1, 2015
Page 3 of 5
Chair Geng stated if Council approves a variance he asked if the variance gets recorded with Hennepin
County. Director Nielsen responded some are. He explained that if this variance requests gets approved
the resolution approving it would be recorded with the County. A copy of the staff report and resolution
are put into the file for this property.
Seeing no one present wanting to comment on the case, Chair Geng opened and closed the Public
Testimony portion of the Public Hearing at 7:10 P.M.
Mr. Hartmann noted that the owner of the property located on the side where the addition would be built
sent in a note of support for his request. Chair Geng stated Ms. Peggy Ploen wrote “I’m giving my consent
to move forward.”
Commissioner Maddy asked if granting a variance would set a precedent for other properties in that area
that have similar setback issues. Director Nielsen responded they would be treated similarly. Maddy then
asked if there are other similar situations in the City. Nielsen stated not that he is aware of.
Commissioner Bean asked if there has ever been an issue with the size of the existing cul-de-sac with
respect to emergency vehicles. Director Nielsen responded that issue has not been raised and stated he
thought the cul-de-sac could possibly be a little small.
Chair Geng stated he thought this case was straight forward. It satisfies the criteria in the Zoning Code.
He noted Shorewood is cautious about granting variances.
Geng moved, Davis seconded, recommending granting the front yard setback variance for Wayne
Hartmann and Michelle Letendre for their property located at 27460 Maple Ridge Lane. Motion
passed 5/0.
Chair Geng noted that Council will consider this matter during its September 28, 2015, meeting.
Mr. Hartmann commented that much of his house is within the 50-foot front yard setback.
Chair Geng closed the Public Hearing at 7:17 P.M.
2. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR
There were no matters from the floor presented this evening.
3. OLD BUSINESS / NEW BUSINESS
A. City Right-of-Way
Commissioner Bean stated because the majority of the homes on the west side of Lake Virginia Drive
encroach on the front yard setback he asked if the right-of-way (ROW) could be vacated to eliminate the
need for other property owners to request a variance.
Director Nielsen stated he would not reduce the ROW width. He noted it is a standard city street. He
stated if more than one or two property owners requested a front yard setback variance it may be
worthwhile to consider a Zoning Code text amendment that would address the Virginia Highlands
development relative to the front yard setback. He then stated the City spends a lot of time trying to
acquire ROW after the fact. He clarified he does not mind vacating ROW when the City has excess
CITY OF SHOREWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
September 1, 2015
Page 4 of 5
ROW; it can then be returned to the tax rolls.
Commissioner Bean asked if there some preemptive action the City could take. Director Nielsen stated a
text amendment could be considered.
Commissioner Johnson asked if the same setback issue exists along Blue Ridge Lane. Director Nielsen
stated he did a spot check on a few properties there and things seemed to be okay.
Director Nielsen stated if a text amendment were to be considered he recommended evaluating the entire
subdivision.
Council Liaison Woodruff stated vacating ROW may solve a technical problem but it would not solve the
problem of the location of the houses. It could possibly result in property owners constructing things that
look out of place because the setback issue was eliminated. He commented the variance request
considered earlier on the agenda would not impact the location of the house relative to the roadway. He
stated during his nine-year tenure on Council this is the first time he recollects any property owner in that
area requesting a variance.
Chair Geng noted he agreed with Director Nielsen and Council Liaison Woodruff that the City should not
vacate the ROW in that area. He then stated that he agreed an assessment of that entire subdivision should
be done before any text amendment is considered. He does not think there is any sense of urgency to get
that done.
Council Liaison Woodruff stated he thought the City would have to hire a surveyor to survey the area.
Director Nielsen stated he did not think that would be necessary. Nielsen explained staff would use as-
built documents from when the sewer went in and aerial photographs. Woodruff asked how accurate the
as-built documents are. Nielsen responded he thought they were pretty good and stated many times they
are more accurate than Hennepin County property tax records. He stated staff can get a good idea of what
the distance is from the paved surface to the structure and then from that determine where the ROW is.
Chair Geng stated if doing the assessment will take a lot of staff time he asked if Council needs to provide
direction.
Director Nielsen stated one way of mitigating the cost of applying for the variance is to waive the fee for
other properties in that area that have a similar issue. Council Liaison Woodruff stated if that is going to
be considered it should apply to the variance request discussed earlier. Nielsen stated he needs to give the
idea more thought.
Nielsen then stated the applicant should have been aware his house did not conform to the setback
requirement when he purchased the property. Chair Geng stated that same situation applies to most of the
other properties in that vicinity.
Commissioner Maddy stated that maybe the reason no one knew about the non-conforming situations for
40 years was because no one wanted to build closer to the roadway.
Commissioner Bean stated any addition would trigger the variance. Director Nielsen clarified any
addition within 50 feet of the ROW would.
Chair Geng stated that earlier in the meeting the applicant had commented that much of his house was
located within the front yard setback.
CITY OF SHOREWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
September 1, 2015
Page 5 of 5
Council Liaison Woodruff stated for the lots on the other side of Lake Virginia Drive he asked if they also
have setback issues.
Chair Geng stated because an assessment would require staff time he suggested not pursuing it at this
time. Commissioner Johnson suggested they be handled on a case by case basis.
Council Liaison Woodruff suggested staff put a note in the files for other properties in that area that have
issues similar to the variance request for the 27460 Maple Ridge Lane property. Chair Geng noted he
thought that would be a good idea.
4. DRAFT NEXT MEETING AGENDA
No agenda was set.
5. REPORTS
• Liaison to Council
Council Liaison Woodruff reported on the items considered and actions taken during Council’s August
28, 2015, meeting (as detailed in the minutes of that meeting).
Commissioner Bean asked if the City has to conduct a traffic study before it can reduce a posted speed
limit to lower than 30 miles per hour (mph). Director Nielsen clarified that is the City’s policy. Council
Liaison Woodruff stated that unless a residential street has a posted speed the speed limit is 30 mph. If the
City wants the posted speed to be lower than that it has to be able to justify why. Nielsen clarified that is
for lowering it down to 25 mph and for anything lower the Minnesota Department of Transportation
(MnDOT) has to conduct the study. Bean stated there are a number of City roadways posted at 25 mph.
Woodruff stated he asked Public Works Director Brown to research if the appropriate Council action was
taken for them. Bean stated he thought most were not set by resolution. Nielsen stated that is likely true
for roadways that have been posted 25 mph for a long time.
Commissioner Bean stated from his perspective the Deephaven Police Department takes traffic
enforcement seriously; at least on Minnetonka Boulevard. Council Liaison Woodruff commented people
should not speed in Deephaven.
• SLUC
• Other
Commissioner Davis asked when the request for proposals (RFP) for urban forester / arborist contract
services will go out. Council Liaison Woodruff encouraged her to call Clerk Panchyshyn.
6. ADJOURNMENT
Maddy moved, Johnson seconded, adjourning the Planning Commission Meeting of September 1,
2015, at 7:44 P.M. Motion passed 5/0.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,
Christine Freeman, Recorder
o r v, w R fe G
00 COD M
a a.
Q CD c o
CD o C Co cD p
CD �D r c y O O o-+. CD
CD
n O
0, IID ID
a OO f h O O q C�
CD
¢ d O
n o .. rh O
9 C. CD -r C CD A,
cAD p 0 a C1 cOOi,
R. o R I. 5 " CD (D �p ,i.
p o
n ¢, N
y ho p p, n (D p% td IQ
p A' N � .. cD � c IL
CA 5• p (OD C O E w
90, aq O Or
PO, iv
°O G. y 13. o h Q 0
..•
N� �00 `�Cn
� O N O O
O
N
W
I
y
O
�7
a
C
o-
G
m
N
O
w
R,
a
z
C
I
R
b
A�
QQ
O
a
CD
0
z
d
a
l
cn
V
U1
n
O
C
D �
X 33
a-<
� n
N r
C
.p co
o O
�. O
o m
o p
a �
yz
Z
�m
O
°—' D
�Ul
in w
�1
0
m w
to
a V
3�
� ca
c (n
y N
r.
x
0
z
0
0
d
n
O
n r
�
y
o
°•
•
O
d
O
N
W
I
y
O
�7
a
C
o-
G
m
N
O
w
R,
a
z
C
I
R
b
A�
QQ
O
a
CD
0
z
d
a
l
cn
V
U1
n
O
C
D �
X 33
a-<
� n
N r
C
.p co
o O
�. O
o m
o p
a �
yz
Z
�m
O
°—' D
�Ul
in w
�1
0
m w
to
a V
3�
� ca
c (n
y N
r.
x
0
z
0
0
d
n
O
Memorandum
Re: Wartnian - Minor Subdivision
11 January 2013
City records indicate that the property is only served with one sewer connection. There
is, however, a manhole conveniently located in front of the property into which another
connection can be made at such time as a new home is built on the easterly lot.
It appears likely that the easterly lot may require some fill in the northerly portion of the
lot. The applicant is advised that if the amount of fill required will be more than 100
cubic yards, a conditional use permit will be required prior to construction of the home on
that lot.
It is recommended that the minor division be approved subject to the following:
1. The applicant must provide deeds for drainage and utility easements, 10 feet
along each side of the new lot line.
2. The applicant must provide an up -to -date (within 30 days) title opinion for review
by the City Attorney.
3. Prior to release of the resolution approving the request, the applicant must pay
park dedication fees ($5000 per lot) and local sanitary sewer access charges
($1200 per lot).
4. Since the division itself does not result in the removal of any trees from the
property, tree preservation and reforestation can be addressed at the time building
permits are applied for.
5. Once the applicant receives the resolution approving the subdivision, he must
record it, and the easement deeds, within 30 days.
Cc: Bill Joynes
Paul Hornby
Larry Brown
Tim Keane
Tom Waltman
-2-
Lake Minnetonka
IE
�m
y�
r�
oa
y
O
m
i
N
W
i
bun em.
Property
y Noble Rd�
i
i
m
Marsh -P
Marsh-Pt Pointe Cir
,, Ct
O
cu
� O
Rd
N
A
0 350 700
1,400
Feet
a +
a
y
r
s Ridge
Valle y.
Oa Cir
Cir 0,
L
Y
.L
1
TRse_L
Wild
Arbor Creek
N
La
o
J
Smithtown
iCir
�<
— —
— — — — — —
— —
— — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — --�
NORTH
0 a44'
0
15 0 15 30 00
yeti
--
/- NORTH LINE OF LOT 10 945 c
SCALE IN FEET
--
9FI_
— �il
2 —
;— :_,+_.=- ___EDGEW_OOD°ROA_D
—
_ _ ,
Fo a s "2a7
_
,N89°581 "E . _ , 249 °91
-
— 0
124.95 uP].3 tL1AET
124.96l)F 1
F0�1
/2° OFui
NORIHWES ORNER LOT —"
710
BLOCRTL HERITAGE
19 i
IQ
1
LEGEND I
I
.3 +3.e
}
d
.vrr.i
AIS
Denotes Advertising- Informational Sign
I
I
I I I- — it I
/�
AC
BFE
Denotes Air Conditioning Unit
g
De Basement Floor Elevation
r _ �_ 1=���
CB
:BOX
notes
Des Catch Basin
Denotes Curb Box
o 3t
I
i
SQL
9EE
DenolesBuild'mgColumn I
D e notes Building Entrance Elevation
�O
\
N N
\
1
pO
TB
Denoles Tele/Comm.Box/Ped i
I
I
1
u1
:HH
Denotes Communication Handhole
�]
a
M
wo es Communication Manhole
L1J
¢
ONC
Denotes Concrete Surface
PARCEL 1
PARCEL
2 I
;MP
Denotes CorrugatedMemlPipeSae
<
(
DIP
Denotes Ductile iron PipeSize I
� I
,� ( ^
E-
EB
Denotes Electric Box
I
I
W
i0
-HH
Denotes ElectrcHendhole
_
to
-
,� +„
U1 o
�
RAN
Denotes Electric Transformer
I
_�
MO
I
o
I L'
m
NO
-MH
EM
Denotes Electric Manhole
Denotes Electric Meter I
c,
j �,5i55
1 /-v-r I
o 1 n
Z I V
I
O
FH
Denoles Fire Hookup
Z
of
to
FP
Denotes F1.9 Pole
f
FES
Denotes Flared End SectioolSize
;ASV
Denotes Gas Valve
I o
GFE
Denotes Garage Floor Elevation
f`.3II�. -
r
GM
Denotes Gas Meter
\
fVN1. �7
I \
'DL
GP
Denotes Ground Light
Denotes Guard Post I
• r+s5 , I
I _'_
I \
osi.<
;yen
Denotes Guy W e
ICS
Denotes Handicap Parking Sign
IyD
Denoles Fire Hydrant
r++7
Lp
De notes Light Pale
MB
Denotes Mailbox
I0P
Denoles No Parking Sign
.35 cp
)JJU
Denotes Overhead Utility Line
-KS
Denotes Parking Sign
PIV
Denotes Post Indicator Valve
RCP
Denotes Re- infomed Concrete Pipc/Size
`
RD
Denotes Roof Drain
3CO
Denotes Sanitary Cleanout
3MH
Denotes Sanitary Manhole
SV
Denotes Septic Vent
STP
Denotes Stop Sign
SMH
Denotes Smm Manhole I
i0
t0
TRS
Denotes Traffic Control Sign
—
._- —
— — — —
_ — —
�esn
— — -
TL
Denotes Tmfe Light
�,
uas.;
s.ro- •y.,.;,o
i%Y OPEN 124.95
7+ 124.96
Nr
o
1GC
Denotes Underground Communication Line
— _ — — — — —
—
ys+s
v RLS 77,
JGE
Denotes Underground Electric Line
ossl
N89o58.07 "E 249.91
Fn a15 7725
1GG
Denotes Underground Gas Lin.
Y
/ FD RLS 13297
SOUTH LINE OF LOT 10- /
/
3AN
Denotes Underground Sanitary Sewer'
ST
Denotes Underground Storm Sewer
I n-r- rT / I
UP
Denotes Utility Pole
/e,xe
JLP
Denotes Utility/LigbtPole
/
MH
Denotes TOp NulofHydmat
WH
Denotes Water Manhole
WV
Denotes Water Valve
T A -1 Denotes Welland De lineation/Flag Identifier
-
Denotes Existing Contour
2g6)—Denotes Proposed Contour
—
•
Denotes Found Monument -As Denoted
QDenloes
Found Cast- Iron - Monument
/
O
Denotes 1/2" by 14" Iron Pipe Setand Marked
by License No. 40344
/
Exhibit B
PROPOSED SUBDIVISION