Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
03-28-16 CC Reg Mtg Agenda
CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING COUNCIL CHAMBERS MONDAY, MARCH 28, 2016 7:00 P.M. AGENDA 1. CONVENE CITY COUNCIL MEETING A. Roll Call Mayor Zerby___ Labadie___ Siakel___ Sundberg___ Woodruff___ B. Review Agenda Attachments 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. City Council/Park Commission Joint Work Session Minutes of March 14, 2016 Minutes B. City Council Regular Meeting Minutes of March 14, 2016 Minutes 3. CONSENT AGENDA – Motion to approve items on the Consent Agenda & Adopt Resolutions Therein: A. Approval of the Verified Claims List Claims List B. Professional Services Agreement for a Water Supply Plan Director of Public Works’ memo C. Approve Plans and Specifications, Authorize Advertisement Engineer’s memo, For Bids for the 2016 Crack Fill and Seal Coat Project Resolution 4. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR (No Council Action will be taken) 5. PUBLIC HEARING 6. REPORTS AND PRESENTATIONS A. Senator David Osmek Report on Activities 7. PARKS A. Report on the March 22 Park Commission meeting Draft Minutes B. Badger Park Playfield Bid Results Planning Director’s memo 8. PLANNING A. Report on the March 15 Planning Commission meeting CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA – March 28, 2016 Page 2 B. Conditional Use Permit for Accessory Space over 1200 Sq. Ft. Planning Director’s Applicant: Bradley Hauser memo, Resolution Location: 5640 Covington Road C. Approve Concept and Development Stage Plan Planning Director’s of a Planned Unit Development for Shorewood Senior Living memo, Resolution Applicant: Oppidan Investment Company Location: 23075 State Highway 7 and 6020 & 6050 Chaska Road D. Minnetonka Country Club Grading Permit Planning Director’s memo, Resolution 9. ENGINEERING/PUBLIC WORKS 10. GENERAL/NEW BUSINESS 11. STAFF AND COUNCIL REPORTS A. Administrator and Staff 1. Trails Schedule Trail Schedule 2. MCES Lift Station relocation 3. LRT Trail Crossing at Cty Rd 19 B. Mayor and City Council 12. ADJOURN CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, Minnesota 55331 952-960-7900 Fax: 952-474-0128 www.ci.shorewood.mn.us cityhall@ci.shorewood.mn.us Executive Summary Shorewood City Council Regular Meeting Monday, March 28, 2016 7:00 p.m. 6:00 PM – City Council Work Session Agenda Items #2A-2C: Approval of Minutes from the March 14 Joint Park Commission and City Council meeting and the March 14 Regular City Council Meeting. Agenda Item #3A: Approval of the verified claims list. Agenda Item #3B: Minnesota State Statute 103G.29 mandates that all metropolitan cities that serve over 1000 people with their water system shall prepare a Water Supply Plan. This item is a motion that accepts the professional engineering proposal for such a report. Agenda Item #3C: Approval of a Resolution accepting plans and specifications for the 2016 Crack Fill and Seal Coat Project, City Project 16-01, and authorization to advertise for bids. Agenda Item #4: Matters from the floor – no council action will be taken. Agenda Item #5: There are no public hearings scheduled this evening. Agenda Item #6A: Senator David Osmek will be present this evening to provide a report on legislative activities. Agenda Item #7A: A report on the March 22 Park Commission meeting will be provided. Agenda Item #7B: An update on the Badger Park playfield quotes is provided for Council’s consideration. Agenda Item #8A: A report on the March 15 Planning Commission meeting will be provided. Agenda Item #8B: This resolution approves a C.U.P. for accessory space in excess of 1200 square feet for a new home and attached garage located at 5640 Covington Road. Approval would allow for the preservation of a nonconforming structure with historic and cultural significance. Executive Summary – City Council Meeting of March 28, 2016 Page 2 Agenda Item #8C: A resolution approving the Concept and Development Stage Plans for Shorewood Senior Living (Oppidan) P.U.D located on three parcels of land located at 6020 and 6050 Chaska Road, and 23075 State Highway 7, is provided for Council’s consideration. Agenda Item #8D: Mattamy Homes has requested a permit to begin grading and underground utility work on the MCC property in advance of having a final plat approved. An early grading development agreement and resolution approving the agreement is provided for Council’s consideration. Agenda Item #10: There are no General/New Business Items this evening. Agenda Item #11A: Staff reports are provided in the packet and will be given at the meeting. #2A CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD WORK SESSION OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND COUNCIL CHAMBERS PARK COMMISSION 6:00 PM MONDAY, MARCH 14, 2016 MINUTES 1. CONVENE WORK SESSION MEETING Mayor Zerby called the meeting to order at 6:00 P.M. A. Roll Call Present: Mayor Zerby; Councilmembers Labadie and Siakel; Administrator Joynes; Clerk Panchyshyn; Finance Director DeJong; Planning Director Nielsen; Director of Public Works Brown; and Engineer Hornby Park Commission Chair Mangold; Park Commissioners Stelmachers and Vassar Absent: Councilmembers Sundberg and Woodruff; Park Commissioners Kobs and Rock B. Review Agenda Labadie moved, Mangold seconded, approving the agenda as presented. Motion passed 6/0. 2. BADGER PARK PLAYFIELD IMPROVEMENTS Mayor Zerby welcomed the Park Commissioners. Director Nielsen stated the purpose of this work session was to discuss what was hoped to be a number of quotes for the construction of an artificial turf field in Badger Park. He explained there is $525,000 in funds pledged to that effort. The Minnetonka Lacrosse Association pledged $150,000; the City of Shorewood has committed $150,000; the City was awarded a $200,000 grant from the Hennepin County Youth Sports Program; and, Minnetonka Football has pledged $25,000. The grant is about $100,000 less than what the City applied for. The City solicited quotes from three firms to construct the field. It received quotes from FieldTurf and AstroTurf. SprintTurf has indicated it is still interested in submitting a quote but it did not get that prepared in time. He discussed the quotes received from FieldTurf and AstroTurf. It does not appear the two quotes reflect an apples-to-apples comparison. AstroTurf was sent the line-item format that FieldTurf used for its quote and was asked to put its quote into that format. That has not been submitted. An AstroTurf representative told him earlier in the day that its quote did not include the two feet of sand that goes under the field to mitigate anticipated poor soils in that area. FieldTurf is assessing ways it can reduce its quote. The Park Commission has discussed both quotes. Councilmember Siakel asked if one of the two firms has more experience with constructing artificial turf fields. Director Nielsen stated both are very experienced. FieldTurf has done a lot of work with Minnetonka High School and the School gave it a good recommendation. AstroTurf was the original artificial turf company but has not done as many jobs in the immediate area. Nielsen noted staff will ask for references for the companies. CITY OF SHOREWOOD WORK SESSION OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND PARK COMMISSION March 14, 2016 Page 2 of 7 Director Nielsen noted that the agenda for Council’s meeting following this work session includes consideration of a proposal to prepare a grading plan for the playfield in Badger Park. That grading plan is needed for either an artificial turf field or a grass field. The cost for doing that is included in both quotes so that will reduce both of them a little. Nielsen stated the Lacrosse Association would like construction to start as soon as possible this spring. It takes 60 – 75 days to complete construction. The Association is willing to give up its 2016 season on the Badger Park playfield. Construction could interfere with the start of the football season. Unfortunately, there is not enough information to make a recommendation on either quote at this time. Mayor Zerby asked if there are any drainage concerns with artificial turf. Director Nielsen stated water flows through the turf and with the sand base it would be somewhat like a filtering system. Nielsen stated currently staff is thinking that only an erosion control permit would be necessary from the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD). Engineer Hornby stated staff will have to find out if the MCWD considers the artificial turf hard surface or not. Hornby explained from an engineering perspective it would absorb almost like a rain garden or a filtration basin. The water will go into the sand layer and then come out of a drain tile system over time. He does not think the MCWD would require any additional stormwater treatment. Zerby asked if staff intends to get in touch with the MCWD. Hornby stated he was going to wait until the project was approved but he will reach out sooner. Chair Mangold stated AstroTurf’s quote does not include a line item for field turf 1 for a layer of sand. Director Nielsen stated staff has told the Lacrosse Association that it is its responsibility to research the health and safety impact of crumb rubber. The Association forwarded information about that to staff which in turn forwarded that to Council. Mayor Zerby asked if the companies took coring soil samples. Director Nielsen stated staff sent the information about the samples taken when the lighting was put in to FieldTurf per its request and he will send it to AstroTurf as well. Chair Mangold noted the Lacrosse Association had indicated during the last Commission meeting that it did not care which company was ultimately selected. The Association was quite nervous about the lack of information in the AstroTurf proposal. FieldTurf included a lot of detail for the different options in its proposal. Commissioner Stelmachers stated neither company provided any information about what it would cost to change crumb rubber to something else. Replacing the crumb rubber with some other material would increase the cost. In response to a comment from Councilmember Siakel, Director Nielsen stated most companies use crumb rubber. Councilmember Siakel stated she thought the question at this time is about how to fund the construction funding gap. Commissioner Stelmachers stated it was his understanding that the Lacrosse Association would be willing to consider increasing its contribution to $175,000. Councilmember Siakel stated she thought it would consider up to $200,000. Chair Mangold stated various amounts have been mentioned. CITY OF SHOREWOOD WORK SESSION OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND PARK COMMISSION March 14, 2016 Page 3 of 7 Chair Mangold noted there is a practice area line item in each of the proposals. That practice area would be for lacrosse only. Mangold stated the Commission has been told that Minnetonka Football would only be willing to contribute additional funding if the field were to be constructed as a full size field. That is not a viable option because of space constraints. Director Brown stated what is currently proposed is 20 yards short. In response to a comment made by Director Brown, Director Nielsen clarified that the Lacrosse Association has been told that the artificial turf field would be a City field; it would belong to the public. Mayor Zerby asked what the revenue expectations are for use of the field. He also asked if lacrosse usage would go up and/or if fees could be increased. If additional revenue would be generated that could help justify the City contributing more money to the construction of the field. Director Nielsen stated the Lacrosse Association has been told that tournaments could not be held on the new artificial turf field because of the limited parking. The biggest advantage for that type of turf is it could be used earlier in the spring. Mayor Zerby asked if there would be an opportunity to put a cable in under the field for access to the City’s network from the Southshore Center. Director Brown stated that could be discussed as part of the parking lot expansion. Chair Mangold stated the Commission has reviewed the fees for ongoing home field use and tournament play. From his perspective the City’s fee structure is kept low because other cities do not charge fees or they keep their fees flow. The City does not have enough fields so that organizations would be willing to pay a higher fee that neighboring cities charge. He noted the revenue earned by the City annually is not very much; maybe a couple thousand dollars. Councilmember Labadie noted the Commission received a copy of the fee schedule for its last meeting. Chair Mangold stated that the Lacrosse Association is already using the field in Badger Park and it intends to use the artificial turf field as its home field. Councilmember Labadie stated sports organizations have a lot of power and money. She cautioned against increasing the fees so much that the organizations would quit using fields in Shorewood. She noted that Tonka Hockey refuses to pay the sock fee the City charges to use Shorewood’s ice rinks. Its players skate in the City of Chanhassen because there is no fee. Commissioner Stelmachers noted that Chanhassen has a significant industrial base that it can draw on. Mayor Zerby asked Council if it would be willing to fund more of the construction even though the City will not see an increase in revenues from fees. Councilmember Siakel stated Council needs to be provided with better numbers on the proposals. Councilmember Siakel stated she does not think Shorewood competes with Chanhassen. She then stated the City should be committed to making its parks the best they can be. She went on to state that from her perspective one hockey rink in Shorewood is sufficient. It should be a quality rink with a warming housing. She noted the City cannot have everything in every park. CITY OF SHOREWOOD WORK SESSION OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND PARK COMMISSION March 14, 2016 Page 4 of 7 Mayor Zerby asked if Council could have revised proposals for its March 28 meeting. Director Nielsen responded yes. Administrator Joynes stated there will be some cost to maintaining the artificial turf field. It would require special equipment. It may require more personnel hours. Chair Mangold stated the Commission is having a special meeting on March 22 with the intent of making a recommendation to Council on March 28. Councilmember Labadie stated during the last Commission meeting she thought Lacrosse Association representatives thought that maybe AstroTurf’s proposal was not as detailed because it thought that maybe FieldTurf would be selected because of the work it has done with the Minnetonka High School. Commissioner Stelmachers asked if people would like the quotes to also include alternatives to using crumb rubber. He clarified he does not have an issue with crumb rubber. Councilmember Siakel stated in all of the information forwarded to Council she did not read anything indicting that crumb rubber was associated with a toxic element. Councilmember Labadie stated she is comfortable with having her children plan on crumb rubber and so are other parents of lacrosse players. Chair Mangold asked if crumb rubber could be switched out at a later date if the FDA study finds there is an issue with it. The rubber will be worn down over time and need to be recoated. Director Nielsen stated he would research that. Mangold stated that the type of surface being proposed is softer when it comes to concussion injuries. Councilmember Siakel stated during previous meetings she thought Lacrosse Association representatives indicated that it would be willing to do some fundraising to help fund construction. Chair Mangold stated the budget for Badger Park improvements is about $1.3 million. If all of the park dedication fees that would come in from the Minnetonka Country Club (MCC) development project were received this year the funding shortfall would be a couple hundred thousand dollars. He asked if Council is willing to allocate more money to Badger Park improvements or if the Commission needs scale back the improvements. Councilmember Siakel stated she thought a lot of the numbers are placeholders. She then stated she does not think all of the improvements will be done at the same time. The improvements would be done in stages. She went on to state the artificial turf field is a priority. The tennis courts need to be replaced. She suggested developing an 8-year long time line for improvements. Mayor Zerby noted the current timeline is two years. Chair Mangold stated the purpose of the Park CIP is for people to know what is going to be done the next year. That is not the current situation. Councilmember Siakel asked Chair Mangold what he thought the next most important improvement in the Park is. CITY OF SHOREWOOD WORK SESSION OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND PARK COMMISSION March 14, 2016 Page 5 of 7 Chair Mangold stated the Commission had looked at the improvements as a concept and then he thought it was paused by Council. He asked if Council is asking the Commission to break the improvements into segments. Councilmember Labadie stated if the improvements were spread out over 5 – 8 years there isn’t funding for all of them. Chair Mangold stated that over the next five years there is a few hundred thousand dollars in the CIP for improvements to other parks. He then stated the Commission had always thought the improvements would be done over two years; in two phases. Mayor Zerby stated he also thought it would be better to spread out the improvements over a longer period of time. Maybe 3 – 4 subprojects. His preference is to move forward with improvements sooner versus later. He then stated he thought a decision was made to eliminate the hockey rink and warming house in Badger Park. Director Nielsen stated those items are not in the concept plan. Councilmember Labadie stated because the City received the grant there is more of a sense of urgency. Mayor Zerby asked what the Park budget is for 2016. Director DeJong responded $690,000. Chair Mangold asked if Council thinks the concept plan for Badger Park is a false hope that needs to be scaled down. Director Nielsen stated the park dedication fees from the MCC development will be received over 3 – 5 years. Mayor Zerby discussed the difference between the FieldTurf quote and the pledged funds for the artificial turf field. If that were taken out of the Park budget it would leave more than $500,000 to spend in 2016 for improvements. Zerby asked what the balance in the Park Improvement Fund is. Director DeJong responded $534,000. Director DeJong stated the assumption has been that the City would receive about $300,000 in park dedications fees from the MCC project in phase 1. When that is included there is enough money to fund 2016 expenses. Councilmember Siakel asked what other park projects, not including Badger Park improvements, are scheduled for 2016. Director DeJong stated there are two other projects – Cathcart Park Hockey Boards and the Skate Park Rehabilitation. Chair Mangold stated those were added after the Commission was told to hold off on Badger Park improvements. Councilmember Siakel stated if there is, for example, $300,000 left after funding the field shortfall and assuming some park dedication fees would be received from the MCC project in 2016 there would be enough money to redo the tennis courts. There are also funds available in the General Fund reserves. She noted she wants to know what the Commission want to achieve in 2016. If it is the artificial turf field then the City and the Lacrosse Association need to figure out how to fund the gap. She stated she has heard that the tennis courts are at the end of their useful life so replacing them might be a high priority. Chair Mangold stated from his vantage points there are higher priorities than the tennis courts; for example, the shelter and play area equipment. CITY OF SHOREWOOD WORK SESSION OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND PARK COMMISSION March 14, 2016 Page 6 of 7 Chair Mangold stated the Commission does not know if Council supports all of the elements in the concept plan for Badger Park. Does Council still support the concept that had been agreed to? If the Commission has to scale the concept back in order to reduce the cost for the improvements and spread out the time for doing them then the shelter, the playground equipment and the open space would likely have to be scaled back. Mayor Zerby stated Council approved the concept plan for Badger Park and the Park CIP. Chair Mangold stated there is only enough funding to do Phase 1 of the concept plan for Badger Park. Those improvements basically prep the site for the next phase. Councilmember Siakel stated it is her recollection that Council approved the concept plan. What needs to be agreed to is the timing of the improvements. She asked Director DeJong to help put together the timeline for the improvements based on available funding. Director DeJong stated Council has been provided with cost estimates for the Phase 1 improvements. The City needs to receive revised quotes for the artificial turf field in order to determine the funding gap for that field. He noted that the grant funding and the pledges from the Lacrosse Association and Minnetonka Football are not reflected in the CIP. Commissioner Stelmachers stated the bids for the concept plan are old. Mayor Zerby stated the list of the Phase 1 improvements includes items that would not be done if the City moves forward with the construction of the artificial turf field; for example, the irrigation system and athletic field seeding. Director Nielsen concurred Phase 1 needs to be redefined. Director Nielsen stated about $90,000 was budgeted in Phase 1 for a grass field. The City has agreed to contribute $150,000 to the artificial turf field. Therefore, that means Phase 1 would cost at least $60,000 more than originally estimated. He then stated staff and the Commission will prepare an alternative phasing plan for the improvements per Council’s direction. Mayor Zerby stated that the parking lot improvements do not need to be made in the next year or two. Councilmember Siakel explained the Park Improvement Fund has a $534,000 balance per Director DeJong. Over the next 3 – 5 years it is anticipated that the City will receive more than $600,000 in park dedication fees from the MCC development. That brings the available funding to over $1.1 million. The original budget for the Badger Park improvements was approximately $1.3 million. The City can find the rest of the money that is needed. She again asked Director DeJong to assist the Commission with developing a timeline based on available funds and priorities. Administrator Joynes stated that during the February 5, 2016, Council and staff retreat staff presented that over the next five years or so the City should receive about $10 – $12 million in funding for projects (not all for park related projects). The estimated cost for projects during that same timeframe is less than $10 million. There should be sufficient funds to complete all of the recommended improvements to Badger Park over a period longer than two years. There is no reason not to move forward with the artificial turf field. CITY OF SHOREWOOD WORK SESSION OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND PARK COMMISSION March 14, 2016 Page 7 of 7 Mayor Zerby stated he does not want to wait another season to move forward with some improvements to Badger Park. He wants construction of the artificial turf field to be done this year. Commissioner Stelmachers stated hopefully the City will receive quotes from all three potential vendors by the Commission’s March 22 meeting. Director Nielsen stated Lacrosse Association representatives are trying to make that happen. Stelmachers asked if the lighting for the existing playfield is going to be moved. Director Nielsen stated the hope is to re-aim them if need be. Nielsen asked where the wiring is for that lighting. Director Brown responded it traverses the field. Engineer Hornby stated if the warming house is taken down the control panel for the lighting would have to be moved. Councilmember Siakel asked if there is a reason to keep the warming house up. Nielsen stated it can be taken down anytime. 3. ADJOURN Stelmachers moved, Siakel seconded, Adjourning the Work Session of the City Council and Park Commission of March 14, 2016, at 6:56 P.M. Motion passed 6/0. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, Christine Freeman, Recorder Scott Zerby, Mayor ATTEST: Jean Panchyshyn, City Clerk #2B CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING COUNCIL CHAMBERS MONDAY, MARCH 14, 2016 7:00 P.M. MINUTES 1. CONVENE CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING Mayor Zerby called the meeting to order at 7:02 P.M. A. Roll Call Present. Mayor Zerby; Councilmembers Labadie, Siakel, and Sundberg (arrived at 7:06 P.M.); Attorney Keane; City Administrator Joynes; City Clerk Panchyshyn; Finance Director DeJong; Planning Director Nielsen; Director of Public Works Brown; and, City Engineer Hornby Absent: Councilmember Woodruff B. Review Agenda Labadie moved, Siakel seconded, approving the agenda as presented. Motion passed 3/0. 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. City Council Retreat Minutes, February 8, 2016 Siakel moved, Labadie seconded, Approving the City Council Retreat Minutes of February 8, 2016, as amended in Item 3.A, Page 11, Paragraph 4, Sentence 2, change “It was her opinion …” to “it was the Park Commission’s opinion …”. Motion passed 3/0. B. City Council Special Meeting Minutes, February 22, 2016 Labadie moved, Siakel seconded, Approving the City Council Special Meeting Minutes of February 22, 2016, as presented. Motion passed 3/0. C. City Council Regular Meeting Minutes, February 22, 2016 Siakel moved, Labadie seconded, Approving the City Council Regular Meeting Minutes of February 22, 2016, as presented. Motion passed 3/0. 3. CONSENT AGENDA Mayor Zerby reviewed the items on the Consent Agenda. Siakel moved, Labadie seconded, Approving the Motions Contained on the Consent Agenda and Adopting the Resolutions Therein. A. Approval of the Verified Claims List CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES March 14, 2016 Page 2 of 11 B. Adopting RESOLUTION NO. 16-016, “A Resolution Adopting the Updated Lake Minnetonka Emergency Management Operations Plan.” C. Accept Proposal for Professional Services for Soil Testing D. Request to Install Mallard Nest on City-Owned Property E. Adopting RESOLUTION NO. 16-017, “A Resolution Approving Change Order No. 1 for Star Lane and Star Circle Utility and Street Improvements, City Project 14- 11.” F. Approve Agreement for Professional Arborist Services for S&S Tree and Horticultural Specialists, Inc. G. Accept a Donation from the American Legion for Safety Camp Councilmember Labadie stated the staff memorandum for Item 3.D states Jim Benson has asked permission to erect a pole to accommodate a straw mat mallard nest in the City-owned pond near his property. Mr. Benson wants to take advantage of ice on the pond to install the nest. She noted that the Hennepin County Sheriff’s Office has issued a thin ice warning for all lakes. She suggested that be adhered to. Motion passed 3/0. Councilmember Sundberg arrived at 7:06 P.M. 4. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR There were no matters from the floor presented this evening. 5. REPORTS AND PRESENTATIONS A. Recognition of Service of Planning Commissioner Tom Geng Mayor Zerby stated Shorewood benefited greatly from Planning Chair Tom Geng’s participation on and leadership of the Planning Commission. Mr. Geng passed away earlier in the year. He thought the City was a better place because of Mr. Geng’s involvement. He explained the Planning Commission flushes out the details for planning related items. Councilmember Sundberg noted she had not known Mr. Geng before being elected to Council. She stated he was an exemplary citizen for the community and state. He took ownership of issues that a lot of people would have avoided. She learned a great deal from him. He had a tremendous amount of integrity and was a fabulous man. She stated she is honored to have known him. Councilmember Labadie stated she met Mr. Geng when she was appointed to serve on the Planning Commission. She held that position prior to being elected to Council. Mr. Geng took her under his wing and taught her what to do and when to do it and what the Shorewood Zoning Code was about. She believes Mattamy Home’s Minnetonka Country Club (MCC) development project would not have moved forward as smoothly as it did without Mr. Geng’s leadership during Planning Commission meetings. His manner helped calm angry crowds down while allowing to residents to express their concerns about the CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES March 14, 2016 Page 3 of 11 development. He was disciplined in running Commission meetings and treated people with respect. She was proud to have served with Mr. Geng and to have gotten to know him. Councilmember Siakel stated she thought highly of the work Mr. Geng did for the City. She also thought of him highly as a friend. Mr. Geng was a kind and gentle soul. He will be greatly missed. She noted that she thinks about Nancy Geng, wife of the late Mr. Geng, often. On behalf of the Council and the residents of Shorewood, Mayor Zerby thanked Nancy Geng for Mr. Geng’s nine years of dedicated service on the Planning Commission and presented her with a plaque of appreciation and recognition. He also presented her with a framed copy of the Proclamation honoring Tom Geng which Council approved during its February 8, 2016, meeting. 6. PUBLIC HEARING 7. PARKS A. Report by Stephanie Vassar on the February 23, 2016, and March 8, 2016, Park Commission Meetings Park Commissioner Vassar reported on matters considered and actions taken at the February 23, 2016, and March 8, 2016, Park Commission meetings (as detailed in the minutes of those meetings). B. Proposal for Professional Services for Badger Park Field Grading Plan Director Nielsen explained the next step in the process for constructing an artificial turf field in Badger Park is to have a grading plan prepared for the area where the field would go. Staff asked WSB & Associates to submit a proposal for providing those professional services. The meeting packet contains a copy of that proposal; the estimated cost is $7,500. He noted staff recommends Council accept the proposal as submitted. Siakel moved, Labadie seconded, accepting the professional services proposal from WSB & Associates to prepare a grading plan for the site of the proposed artificial field in Badger Park for an estimated cost of $7,500. Engineer Hornby noted that the proposal for the grading plan is for the field area only. Mayor Zerby asked staff to contact representatives from the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District about this. Motion passed 4/0. 8. PLANNING 9. ENGINEERING/PUBLIC WORKS A. Edgewood Road / Grant Lorenz Road / Birch Bluff Road Intersection Review Engineer Hornby explained there had been a request to review the parking issue and traffic control at the intersection of Edgewood Road, Grant Lorenz Road and Birch Bluff Road. City staff assessed the intersection for possible parking restrictions and made two recommendations. One is to make Edgewood Road no parking from Grant Lorenz Road to the first driveway to the west on the north side of the CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES March 14, 2016 Page 4 of 11 roadway. The second is to make Grant Lorenz Road / Birch Bluff Road no parking on both sides of the roadways from the south side of Edgewood Road to the north through the first driveway on the north side. The WSB traffic engineer made three recommendations related to traffic control. The first is to clear the roadway right-of-way by trimming and removing trees to improve sight lines for all directions. The second is to convert the existing yield sign to a stop sign for eastbound Edgewood Road. The third is to reduce the radius to provide traffic calming for the turning movement at the northwest quadrant of the intersection. Staff also recommends reducing the radius at the southwest quadrant as well. Staff also recommends the radii include curb to reduce cutting of corners. The modifications to the radii would be done as part of the 2016 Mill and Overlay Project. He noted the meeting packet contains a copy of a resolution that would approve the parking restrictions and convert the yield sign to a stop sign. Mayor Zerby explained that several members of Council have received numerous emails and phone calls from residents and had in-person interactions with residents who expressed concern about the intersection and the traffic on the roadways; in particular during school children pick-up and drop-off hours. The roadways are narrow and the curve is somewhat intimidating. He had asked staff to assess the situation. He has learned no parking areas cannot be enforced unless they are posted no parking and unless Council adopts a resolution approving the no parking restrictions. He stated he supports implementing the recommendations made. Tom Lesser, 26245 Birch Bluff Road, stated his property is located at the corner of Birch Bluff Road and Grant Lorenz Road. He noted that he supports replacing the yield sign with a stop sign. He stated there are a lot of big trees at the intersection and they block visibility. He asked what will be done with those trees. Engineer Hornby explained that typically there is a 30 degree angle for the sight line at an intersection. With the right-of-way it may not be possible to achieve that. On the northwest quadrant there is a requirement to move the trees back or remove them as part of the residential construction project in that area. Mr. Lesser stated the main issue of visibility because of trees is on the northwest quadrant. Mr. Lesser questioned the need for no parking restrictions at the intersection; he does not think there is a problem. He explained that this past winter he only saw one vehicle parked there on a weekend and last winter there were about a handful off instances where vehicles were parked there on a weekend. During the summer he occasionally sees a pickup truck with a canoe on top stop along that area so someone can haul the canoe down to the lake. He thought there is almost no issue with parking along Grant Lorenz Road. There is very little parking of construction vehicles. He stated he thought it was state law that there is no parking within 30 feet of a stop sign. Mayor Zerby asked Mr. Lesser if there is a congestion issue along Birch Bluff Road or Edgewood Road. Mr. Lesser responded no and stated that early on in the construction project there had been a problem but that is no longer the case. Zerby stated each time he has driven by he saw about 10 construction trucks there. Councilmember Labadie stated the parking she observed was mainly on Edgewood Road during daytime construction hours. She does not notice it on weekends and she goes by there often. The construction vehicles usually arrive around 7:30 A.M. Mr. Lesser clarified the workers typically start about 7:04 A.M. Labadie stated some vehicles arrive at 7:30 A.M. and they typically leave about 3:30 P.M. Mr. Lesser asked if a temporary parking restriction during the construction project could be an option. Engineer Hornby clarified that the no parking area would be from Grant Lorenz Road to the first driveway to the west on Edgewood Road; it would not be near the construction area. The owner of the property where the construction is agrees with the restricting parking there in large part because of the way drivers come around the corner from Birch Bluff Road to westbound Edgewood Road. Mayor Zerby asked Mr. Lesser if his concern about the parking restriction is because guests visiting him during evenings or weekends may not have a place to park. Would making the restriction time sensitive CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES March 14, 2016 Page 5 of 11 be more palatable? Mr. Lesser stated parking for guests factors into his position on this. He then stated part of the charm of Shorewood is there is access to the lake and that adds to the quality of life in Shorewood. Councilmember Siakel noted that she lives along Birch Bluff Road. She expressed concern that some drivers are traveling very fast when going around the curve to head west. She stated that it is her understanding that the sight line would be improved as part of the Davis project. It is also her understanding that the house across the street from Mr. Lesser’s home is also going to be torn down and rebuilt. She noted that she supports making changes to help mitigate the speed at which people travel around the curve. She stated she could support some flexibility in timing for the parking restriction. She suggested moving forward with the recommendations made by staff and the traffic engineer. Mr. Lesser stated drivers are able to park vehicles along Edgewood Road where there is a gravel shoulder. If parking there becomes prohibitive they will park along Birch Bluff Road on the south side and they will be to some extent pulling on to his yard because parking is allowed on that side of that roadway. That concerns him. He does not want to incur the expense of putting up a fence and he does not think it would look very good on that corner. Councilmember Siakel stated a number of residents in Mr. Lesser’s neighborhood have contacted members of Council or City representatives expressing general concerns about the intersection. Mr. Lesser expressed his full support for the traffic change at the intersection of Edgewood Road to Grant Lorenz Road. He noted he was not in favor of restricting parking. Katie Hayes Ruoff, 26365 Noble Road, stated her concern about the proposed no parking is related to the public access (i.e.; the fire lane) to the lake. She noted she supports replacing the yield sign with a stop sign. Director Nielsen stated that in the past there was an instance where the City included a sunset clause when it approved a no parking designation. The situation was to be reviewed in 18 months. If the construction projects are causing the parking issue they two projects should be done in 18 months. Ms. Hayes Ruoff stated there is a visibility issue in part because of the trees located very near the roadway. Director Nielsen stated the landscape plan for the Davis construction project reflects 30 foot sight triangles. South Lake Minnetonka Police Department (SLMPD) Chief Meehan confirmed that state law prohibits parking within 30 feet from a stop sign. Mayor Zerby asked if that had to be signed. Meehan stated it has to be signed if the intent is to enforce a no parking ordinance but the state law does not require signage. Engineer Hornby clarified that the graphic in the meeting packet shows the no parking sign on the south side; it should be on the north side. There would only be no parking on the north side of Edgewood Road. He stated that some of the complaints he has heard are about when school buses are dropping off or picking up students their parents drive right up to the intersection and drop their children off. That clogs the intersection. The 30 foot rule should also apply to those drivers during those times. He noted the section along Birch Bluff Road is to keep that road clear for traffic coming around the corner. Director Nielsen stated the traffic engineer has been asked to assess redefining that northwest corner. Currently there is a sweeping curve there. The intent is to make it a sharper corner with curbing. Engineer Hornby reiterated the traffic engineer recommended doing that and that it would be done as part of the 2016 Mill and Overlay Project. CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES March 14, 2016 Page 6 of 11 Councilmember Sundberg asked if it would be beneficial to have a three-way stop at that intersection. Engineer Hornby explained that intersection would not meet warrants for a three-way stop; it barely meets the warrants for a stop on Edgewood Road. The thru street would be Grant Lorenz Road which turns into Birch Bluff Road. Sundberg then asked if it would make sense to only have no parking on Edgewood Road and not Grant Lorenz Road and noted she likes the 18 month long sunset clause idea. Councilmember Labadie noted she also likes the idea of the sunset clause. She stated the intersection has been problematic for a long time; before the construction project. The parking issue has been because of the construction project. Councilmember Siakel again suggested implementing the staff’s and the traffic engineer’s recommendation and putting a sunset clause on the no parking. Councilmember Labadie stated that her biggest concern is about a driver who had come to a complete stop at the stop sign and then made a turn left on to Birch Bluff Road and a vehicle coming around Birch Bluff Road very quickly. She thought that could be addressed with the realignment and curbing. Mayor Zerby stated he also supports having a sunset clause for the no parking restriction. He suggested the restriction be limited to Monday through Friday from 6:00 A.M. – 6:00 P.M. He stated that even though vehicles could be ticketed for parking within 30 feet of the proposed stop sign he thought it should be signed no parking as well. He cautioned against creating a situation where drivers park on the side of the road where Mr. Lesser’s home is. Director Nielsen suggested the no parking restriction be consistent with construction hours of 7:00 A.M. – 7:00 P.M. Siakel moved, Sundberg seconded, Adopting RESOLUTION NO. 16-018, “A Resolution Restricting Parking on Edgewood Road, Grant Lorenz Road and Birch Bluff Drive” subject to the restriction being limited to 7:00 A.M. – 7:00 P.M. Monday through Friday and to include a sunset clause for eighteen months from now to reevaluate the need for the restriction. Motion passed 4/0. Councilmember Siakel stated she has always thought people should have access to the lake. She noted that are three fire lanes off of Birch Bluff Road. She stated the intent of restricting parking is strictly about safety and trying to make the traffic generated from two large construction projects manageable. It is not about limiting access to the lake. Mayor Zerby stated the City is just trying to calm the traffic situation. B. Approve Professional Services Agreement for 2016 Trunk Watermain Improvements, City Project 16-04 (Oppidan) Location: 6000 Chaska Road Director Brown explained Oppidan Investment Company, located in the City of Excelsior, is proposing to build an Oppidan Senior Living Facility located at 23075 State Highway 7. Currently that site does not have access to municipal water. Oppidan has asked City staff to prepare a feasibility report for the extension of Shorewood watermain to the project site. Oppidan has not formally petitioned the City for the extension. Oppidan is interested in starting the project in 2016. Therefore, there is a sense of urgency in preparing the feasibility report. Shorewood does not have watermain in the immediate vicinity. Watermain would have to be extended down Grant Street and Academy Avenue. That area is currently served by Excelsior’s municipal water system and Shorewood residents in that area get their water from that system. CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES March 14, 2016 Page 7 of 11 The feasibility study would determine the size of the Shorewood watermain. Excelsior’s watermain could remain in place as a parallel system or it could be removed and the Shorewood watermain could be upsized to accommodate existing properties currently being served by the Excelsior water system and new properties including the Senior Housing Facility. WSB & Associates has submitted a proposal for providing professional services to prepare the feasibility report for an amount of $18,342 contingent upon the developer signing a formal petition. The developer would pay for the report. A WaterCad Model would also need to be prepared for a cost of $4,500. That would determine the size of the watermain. Staff recommends the cost for that be funded out of the Water Fund because that has to do with the City’s water system buildout. The topographic survey (for an approximate cost of $6,335) and the geotechnical reports (for an approximate cost of $7,000) would not be pursued until the final design phase of the project. Brown noted that staff recommends Council accept the proposal from WSB & Associates to prepare the feasibility report to be paid for by the developer and to authorize the preparation of the WaterCad Model to be funded out of the Water Fund. Councilmember Siakel stated it is her understanding Excelsior has declined the request to extend its watermain to the project site. Administrator Joynes confirmed that. Siakel asked if it is legal for Excelsior to do that. Attorney Keane responded it is. Mayor Zerby stated he thought water was a necessity that government provides. Joynes stated there is an agreement that was put in place in 1996 that includes language which basically states Excelsior can deny providing services to other cities for capacity reasons. Excelsior has claimed it is at or near capacity and indicated it is also tied up in the competing senior housing projects. Mayor Zerby asked if Chaska has watermain in that area. Director Brown responded no. Zerby then asked if the developer could put in a well to serve the project. Brown stated it might be possible but the cost would be very expensive when things such as water suppression and booster pumps are factored in. Siakel moved, Labadie seconded, accepting the proposal for professional services from WSB & Associates as presented to prepare a feasibility report for the extension of Shorewood watermain to the site of Oppidan Investment Company’s proposed Senior Housing Facility that would be located at 23075 State Highway 7 for an amount not to exceed $18,342 which would ultimately be paid for by Oppidan and authorizing the preparation of a WaterCad Model for a cost not to exceed $4,500 to be paid for out of the Water Fund. Motion passed 4/0. C. Approve Plans, Specifications and Authorize Advertisement for Bids for the 2016 Mill and Overlay Improvements, City Project 16-03 Engineer Hornby explained the roadways included in 2016 Mill and Overlay Improvement Project are: Garden Road from Minnetonka Boulevard to the southeast terminus; Gillette Curve from Minnetonka Drive to the east terminus; McKinley Place North from Near Mountain Boulevard to the north terminus; McKinley Place South from Near Mountain Boulevard to the south terminus; and, Shady Hills Circle from Shady Hills Road to Shady Hills Road. Summit Avenue has been postponed to 2017 because of the redevelopment and the construction of homes along that roadway. The 2016 Street Reconstruction Capital Improvement Program (CIP) has allocated $200,000 for road maintenance and bituminous mill and overlays. During Council’s February 22, 2016, meeting Council authorized the preparations of plans and specifications for these improvements. Those plans and specifications are nearly complete CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES March 14, 2016 Page 8 of 11 He noted staff recommends Council adopt the resolution approving the plans and specifications and authorize the advertisement for bids for the 2016 Mill and Overlay Project. Sundberg moved, Labadie seconded, Adopting RESOLUTION NO. 16-019, “A Resolution Approving Plans and Specifications and Authorizing Advertising for Bids 2016 Mill and Overlay Improvement Project, City Project 16-03.” Motion passed 4/0. D. Approve Partnership Request for Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District Flood Impact Study Engineer Hornby explained the Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District (RPBCWD) wants to partner with Shorewood for the development of a floodplain study and risk assessment map using Atlas 14 hydrologic curves. It is funding the $55,000 study and it would like its local partners to fund a $26,900 of the cost. It has asked Shorewood to contribute $2,000 toward the study. Silver Lake is the headwaters of Purgatory Creek. The amount of the District located in Shorewood is 1.7 percent; or, 492.6 acres of the total 29,719.7 acres. A pro-rata share of the study fee would be approximately $460. He noted the City would get the shapefiles for the flood zones for its graphical information system. Councilmember Siakel asked if it would be valuable for the City to have the shapefiles. Engineer Hornby stated he does not know what the downstream impacts are from Silver Lake. He thought there are a few properties in Shorewood that could be affected by the floodplains. Engineer Hornby stated this gives the City an opportunity to partner with the RPBCWD. Councilmember Sundberg stated she supports contributing $2,000 for that reason. Councilmember Siakel asked why the RPBCWD does not fund all of it. It is a taxing entity. She noted she would support it. Mayor Zerby stated the amount Shorewood is being asked to contribute is small and he thought it would be a good partnership. He then stated that he and Councilmember Sundberg visit with representatives from the RPBCWD each year during its open house. Its research related to carp control is interesting. He noted the RPBCWD has made significant operational improvements over the last few years when compared to 10 – 15 years ago. Sundberg moved, Zerby seconded, authorizing staff to enter into a funding partnership with the Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District (RPBCWD) for the development of a floodplain study and risk assessment map using Atlas 14 hydrologic curves for an amount of $2,000 with the funds coming out of the Stormwater Fund. Motion passed 4/0. 10. GENERAL/NEW BUSINESS A. Consideration of Fees for Special Events Permits Administrator Joynes explained Council had asked staff to recommend a fee schedule for special events that occur in the City. The meeting packet contains a copy of a memorandum outlining staff’s research findings and recommendations. Staff recommended an administrative fee of $50.00 per event for special events that are not public in nature. He clarified the fee is not to recoup all of the City’s costs. Staff is asking Council to approve two ordinance changes – one is an amendment to Shorewood City Code Chapter 505.02 and the second is to establish the fee structure. CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES March 14, 2016 Page 9 of 11 Mayor Zerby thanked staff for their efforts on this. He stated he thought staff’s recommendation is good. He clarified the fee is not to restrict activities. It is about being aware of special events and communicating information to residents. Zerby moved, Siakel seconded, Approving ORDINANCE NO. 526, “An Ordinance Amending Section 505.02 of the Shorewood City Code” and Approving ORDINANCE NO. 527. “An Ordinance Titled ‘License, Permit, Service Charges and Miscellaneous Fees’”. Motion passed 4/0. Councilmember Labadie stated she thought some of the anticipated attendance numbers were low. She suggested the participant numbers do not include observers. Clerk Panchyshyn clarified those numbers were taken off of the permit applications and noted the application form is going to be revised. B. Agreement with Mangold Horticulture for Landscape Maintenance at the Southshore Center Administrator Joynes noted the City had received a proposal from Mangold Horticulture for continuing to provide landscape / garden maintenance around the Southshore Center for 2016 for an amount of $2,010. Staff recommends Council accept the proposal. Labadie moved, Siakel seconded, accepting the proposal from Mangold Horticulture to provide landscape / garden maintenance around the Southshore Center for an amount not to exceed $2,010. Motion passed 4/0. C. Agreement with Mangold Horticulture for Landscape Maintenance at Shorewood City Hall and Utility Building in Badger Park Director Nielsen explained the City received a proposal from Mangold Horticulture for continuing to provide landscape maintenance around City Hall for an amount of $4,510 not including tax. Mangold increased its monthly fee by $67.50 (or $540 for eight months) when compared to its 2015 monthly fee because more weeding would be required. The total bid amount also includes mulch topdressing as well as spring and fall clean up. Staff also requested Mangold submit a proposal for cleaning up and providing landscaping and landscape maintenance around the Utility Building near the Southshore Center. The proposal received was for an amount of $3,095 not including tax and includes cleaning up the area around the Building and providing monthly garden maintenance ($45 a month for seven months) around the Building. Nielsen noted staff recommends Council accept the proposals from Mangold Horticulture. Mayor Zerby suggested the plantings be pollinator friendly. Labadie moved, Siakel seconded, authorizing the City Administrator to enter into an agreement with Mangold Horticulture for City Hall landscape maintenance and mulch top dressing as well a one spring and two fall clean ups for an amount not to exceed $4,510 not including tax and for landscape maintenance and monthly clean up around the Utility Building near the Southshore Center for an amount not to exceed $3,095 not including tax subject to some pollinator friendly plantings being included. Motion passed 4/0. 11. STAFF AND COUNCIL REPORTS CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES March 14, 2016 Page 10 of 11 A. Administrator and Staff 1. Trail Schedule Mayor Zerby noted the meeting packet contains a copy of the Trail Schedule. Engineer Hornby noted the tree trimming and tree removal for the Smithtown Road east sidewalk extension was completed the week of February 24. The work was completed in two days. Mayor Zerby stated there are still some traffic control cones around. Hornby stated he will contact the contractor about that. Hornby noted Xcel Energy is going to have to relocate some of its utility poles in that area. The cones could be Xcel’s. He also noted that construction of the trail is scheduled to start the first week of May. 2. Minnesota Department of Transportation Signing Project Trunk Highway 7 Director Brown explained the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) is going to start a signing project along Trunk Highway 7 that goes from Trunk Highway 41 through the City of Hopkins. The City may be able to comment on the Christmas Lake Boat access sign; it is somewhat of a temporary sign. Mayor Zerby stated one of the sign changes that will be made is to increase the speed limit from 50 miles an hour (mph) to 55 mph. Director Brown explained that about five years ago MnDOT did a speed study th and recommended a speed limit change at that time because the 85 percentile speed was well in excess of 50 mph. At that time the former chief of the South Lake Minnetonka Police Department (SLMPD) recommended against that increase. Other Mayor Zerby stated he has learned that the uninterrupted power supply (UPS) system for the Public Safety Facility in Shorewood is damaged. The surge suppressor has also failed. Director Brown explained that Facility has some mission critical systems that depend on the UPS system. There is no concrete answer for what caused the problems. He asked one of the electrical contractors the City uses to look into it. The cost of replacing the UPS unit and the cost of replacing the individual components of it has been researched. The Fire Chief and Chief of Police have recommended replacing the damaged UPS components and the surge suppressor. Mayor Zerby thanked Director Brown for assisting with that. Engineer Hornby stated that Councilmember Sundberg and staff met with representatives from Xcel Energy last week to discuss Xcel’s Partners in Energy Program. One of the City’s renewable energy consultants suggested the City look into it. Applications must be submitted no later than March 18, 2016. The City would essentially form an energy committee to discuss what the goals of the City could be and develop a plan to implement the goals. Xcel has tools to help the City accomplish that through a planning process that would take about six months. There might be some overlap with the City’s Renewable Energy Study that is nearing completion. He noted staff is seeking Council direction to submit the application. Councilmember Sundberg stated Xcel does little marketing for the Program. The few cities that have been involved with the Program have not reached the end point of the process. She explained the City’s CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES March 14, 2016 Page 11 of 11 Communications Coordinator looked over the application and does not think it would be onerous to fill it out. She noted that she is not committed to moving forward with participating in the Program because there is a lot of overlap with the Renewable Energy Study. She can support moving forward with the application. The essence of participating in Xcel’s Program would be to solicit more input from the community. Director DeJong stated audit preparations continue to move forward. Director Nielsen explained a meeting is scheduled for March 17, 2016, with representatives from the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) and the Christmas Lake Homeowners Association to discuss what, if any, aquatic invasive species (AIS) mitigation activities would be done this year. Councilmember Siakel stated there is a big tree down on the Minnetonka Country Club (MCC) property. Director Nielsen stated he will bring that up to the developer of the MCC property. Nielsen then stated that during Council’s March 28 meeting Council will be asked to consider a request from the developer for an early development permit. That would allow the developer to do start grading before its final plat is approved. That requires the developer to enter into an agreement that would require the developer to restore the site should the final plat not get approved. Administrator Joynes stated he and Attorney Keane are going to meet on March 16 with representatives from the City of Excelsior regarding the proposed The Waters of Excelsior senior housing project. He noted a Council work session has been scheduled for March 28 to discuss tax increment financing (TIF). He stated Council will have to make decisions about The Waters of Excelsior TIF project. The City will also receive a request from Oppidan Investment Company to use TIF for its proposed senior housing project. B. Mayor and City Council Councilmember Sundberg stated she has received a copy of the completed Renewable Energy Study Report. The Report includes a list of recommendations and suggested timelines. She suggested that she and Engineer Hornby work with the consultants to modify the report to better reflect realities for the City if the other members of Council are okay with that. 12. ADJOURN Labadie moved, Sundberg seconded, Adjourning the City Council Regular Meeting of March 14, 2016, at 8:23 P.M. Motion passed 4/0. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, Christine Freeman, Recorder ATTEST: Scott Zerby, Mayor Jean Panchyshyn, City Clerk #3A MEETING TYPE City of Shorewood Council Meeting Item Regular Meeting Title / Subject: Verified Claims Meeting Date: March 28, 2016 Prepared by: Michelle Nguyen, Senior Accountant Bruce DeJong, Finance Director Attachments: Claims lists Policy Consideration: Should the attached claims against the City of Shorewood be paid? Background: Claims for council authorization. 62403-62405 & ACH 41,344.81 Pending 62406-62437 & ACH 66,137.82 Total Claims $107,482.63 We have also included a payroll summary for the payroll period ending March 20, 2016. Financial or Budget Considerations: These expenditures are reasonable and necessary to provide services to our residents an budgeted and available for these purposes. Options: The City Council is may accept the staff recommendation to pay these claims or may r expenditure it deems not in the best interest of the city. Recommendation / Action Requested: Staff recommends approval of the claims list as presented. Next Steps and Timelines: Checks will be distributed following approval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`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a;= 55" E/!*$@"*F$.&"*E/!*$@"*F$.*# 1/G"/ !E/!*$@"*F$ !" 6989H896;<^ F(&$R*##/ !$6986:8;<=678;D8;<96;=66=:9:?=6666$99IH6 @!A$^ F(&@!Aa;= 55"$K "&)$$99IH6 $<9:99$K "&)2$99IH6 %=+,* -$.*"&/)$P789:896;<$=$;;27>$ 3Q%&4*$;6 !"#$%& ' !"()* +%,$-* $99IH6 P/L"1"53+(8M7C"7;3KH+#43";,*)=> GPX"1"53#+I(7"9<- "4* %"+ ,$-*" $<9:976789?896;< @!AD:6> E/!*$@"*F$.&"*E/!*$@"*F$.*# 1/G"/ !E/!*$@"*F$ !" 6786?896;<+&", &1"$K1&/)*1;6;=H9=:997=6666$;D>I>? @!A$D:6>$K "&)$$;D>I>? $<9:97$K "&)2$;D>I>? $;D>I>? GPX"1"53#+I(7";,*)=> GXL"1"53;I8"7+937"4# "9<- "4* %"+ ,$-*" $<9:9:6789?896;< @!A@BC:?;?9? E/!*$@"*F$.&"*E/!*$@"*F$.*# 1/G"/ !E/!*$@"*F$ !" 6786?896;<L/ ,83%=+7669$+ ) 1$+ G/*1;6;=;>=:99;=6666$:H7I66 6786?896;<L/ ,83%=+7669$+ ) 1$+ G/*1<6;=66=:7H;=6666$776I66 6786?896;<L/ ,83%=+7669$+ ) 1$+ G/*1<;;=66=:7H;=6666$79>IHD @!A$@BC:?;?9?$K "&)$$;Y;;9IHD $<9:9:$K "&)2$;Y;;9IHD $;Y;;9IHD GXL"1"53;I8"7+937"4# ";,*)=> GXA"1"54(M37;"5+494#6"7J7;357"4# "9<- "4* %"+ ,$-*" $66789?896;< @!ADH766 E/!*$@"*F$.&"*E/!*$@"*F$.*# 1/G"/ !E/!*$@"*F$ !" 6:86;896;<B*X#)*""*1$% #"&4*#= G1/);6;=;7=:96?=6666$:HDI;> 6:86;896;<B*X#)*""*1$RA = G1/);6;=;7=::66=6666$:;7I:: @!A$DH766$K "&)$$?D6I<7 $6$K "&)2$?D6I<7 GXA"1"54(M37;"5+494#6"7J7;357"4# ";,*)=>$?D6I<7 P/X"1"54##378;+"5:#4 4K+9" 93ID7"4#7;4;:;3R55 4S"9<- "4* %"+ ,$-*" $<9:9H6789?896;< @!A96;<=33+@ E/!*$@"*F$.&"*E/!*$@"*F$.*# 1/G"/ !E/!*$@"*F$ !" 67899896;<96;<=33+@=S1*!5&$%1/ ;6;=;7=:77;=6666$;;6I66 %=+,* -$.*"&/)$P789:896;<$=$;;27>$ 3Q%&4*$;; !"#$%& ' !"()* +%,$-* @!A$96;<=33+@$K "&)$$;;6I66 $<9:9H$K "&)2$;;6I66 $;;6I66 P/X"1"54##378;+"5:#4 4K+9" 93ID7"4#7;4;:;3R55 4S";,*)=> LGG"1"8UU4 3"(3K8;"9<- "4* %"+ ,$-*" $<9:9<6789?896;< @!A?7696H;;D66; E/!*$@"*F$.&"*E/!*$@"*F$.*# 1/G"/ !E/!*$@"*F$ !" 678;D896;<R GG)/*#;6;=;7=:966=6666$>HI<> @!A$?7696H;;D66;$K "&)$$>HI<> $<9:9<$K "&)2$>HI<> $>HI<> LGG"1"8UU4 3"(3K8;";,*)=> LLL"1"K4;#3J"?8M37"698?+9"U4#+# 4+9"73I24 37"99 "9<- "4* %"+ ,$-*" $<9:9D6789?896;< @!AH::6>H:=3L;< E/!*$@"*F$.&"*E/!*$@"*F$.*# 1/G"/ !E/!*$@"*F$ !" 678;7896;<b &1"*1)'$3*"*1$E*&#*$% #"&4*;6;=;>=::;6=6666$;>DI66 @!A$H::6>H:=3L;<$K "&)$$;>DI66 $<9:9D$K "&)2$;>DI66 $;>DI66 LLL"1"K4;#3J"?8M37"698?+9"U4#+# 4+9"73I24 37"99 ";,*)=> LLA"1"K:I H+73"K8M3I"9<- "4* %"+ ,$-*" $66789?896;< @!AL*M/))=679796;< E/!*$@"*F$.&"*E/!*$@"*F$.*# 1/G"/ !E/!*$@"*F$ !" 67897896;< "$a?666=>666=6D:7=?997;6;=;7=:96?=6666$;Y666I66 67897896;< "$a?666=>666=6D:7=?997;6;=;7=:96?=6666$96I>> @!A$L*M/))=679796;<$K "&)$$;Y696I>> $6$K "&)2$;Y696I>> LLA"1"K:I H+73"K8M3I";,*)=>$;Y696I>> P./"1"I3+(J"M+;;"393 ;I4 "9<- "4* %"+ ,$-*" $<9:9?6789?896;< %=+,* -$.*"&/)$P789:896;<$=$;;27>$ 3Q%&4*$;9 !"#$%& ' !"()* +%,$-* @!A>>>;7 E/!*$@"*F$.&"*E/!*$@"*F$.*# 1/G"/ !E/!*$@"*F$ !" 678;:896;<R/1*!$L*G&/1;6;=79=::66=6666$<>9I66 @!A$>>>;7$K "&)$$<>9I66 $<9:9?$K "&)2$<>9I66 $<>9I66 P./"1"I3+(J"M+;;"393 ;I4 ";,*)=> P.."1"7+;3994;3"7H39;3I7C"4# W154##3+K8947"9<- "4* %"+ ,$-*" $<9:9>6789?896;< @!AL@[769>: E/!*$@"*F$.&"*E/!*$@"*F$.*# 1/G"/ !E/!*$@"*F$ !" 6786D896;<+&", &1"$K1&/)*1;6;=H9=:997=6666$796I66 @!A$L@[769>:$K "&)$$796I66 $<9:9>$K "&)2$796I66 $796I66 P.."1"7+;3994;3"7H39;3I7C"4# W154##3+K8947";,*)=> L0N"1"7H8I3M88(";I:3"2+9:3"9<- "4* %"+ ,$-*" $<9:766789?896;< @!A;9?9?D E/!*$@"*F$.&"*E/!*$@"*F$.*# 1/G"/ !E/!*$@"*F$ !" 678;6896;<R, G$R GG)';6;=79=:9:H=6666$;I7? @!A$;9?9?D$K "&)$$;I7? @!A;9?79< E/!*$@"*F$.&"*E/!*$@"*F$.*# 1/G"/ !E/!*$@"*F$ !" 678;H896;<R, G$R GG)/*#;6;=79=:9:H=6666$;;;I:< @!A$;9?79<$K "&)$$;;;I:< @!A;9?7>> E/!*$@"*F$.&"*E/!*$@"*F$.*# 1/G"/ !E/!*$@"*F$ !" 67899896;<K )$S \;6;=79=:9:H=6666$;6I>> @!A$;9?7>>$K "&)$$;6I>> $<9:76$K "&)2$;97I?7 $;97I?7 L0N"1"7H8I3M88(";I:3"2+9:3";,*)=> L00"1"7HI3(1#168"4# "9<- "4* %"+ ,$-*" %=+,* -$.*"&/)$P789:896;<$=$;;27>$ 3Q%&4*$;7 !"#$%& ' !"()* +%,$-* $<9:7;6789?896;< @!AH:HHD E/!*$@"*F$.&"*E/!*$@"*F$.*# 1/G"/ !E/!*$@"*F$ !" 678;D896;<R,1*55*5$RA ;6;=;7=::66=6666$7HI66 @!A$H:HHD$K "&)$$7HI66 $<9:7;$K "&)2$7HI66 $7HI66 L00"1"7HI3(1#168"4# ";,*)=> LA/"1"78:;H"9+D3"54##3;8#D+"K894 3"(3K+I;53#;"9<- "4* %"+ ,$-*" $<9:796789?896;< @!A96;HS ))*"G1 M E/!*$@"*F$.&"*E/!*$@"*F$.*# 1/G"/ !E/!*$@"*F$ !" 6989>896;<96;H$S ))*"G1 M$C*#"$%&'F*!"$L*M !5;6;=9;=:9:H=6666$;YH>6I66 @!A$96;HS ))*"G1 M$K "&)$$;YH>6I66 @!A96;<S ))*"G1 M E/!*$@"*F$.&"*E/!*$@"*F$.*# 1/G"/ !E/!*$@"*F$ !" 6989>896;<96;<$S ))*"G1 M$C*#"$%&'F*!"$L*M !5;6;=9;=:9:H=6666$:><I9H @!A$96;<S ))*"G1 M$K "&)$$:><I9H @!AO*(=96;<=W+%O= 55" E/!*$@"*F$.&"*E/!*$@"*F$.*# 1/G"/ !E/!*$@"*F$ !" 6989>896;<W*!!$+"'$%1 *##$O**=O*(=$ 55"/ !&);6;=9;=::66=6666$;69IHH @!A$O*(=96;<=W+%O= 55"$K "&)$$;69IHH $<9:79$K "&)2$9Y;??I?6 LA/"1"78:;H"9+D3"54##3;8#D+"K894 3"(3K+I;53#;";,*)=>$9Y;??I?6 LXN"1";8;+9"KI4#;4#6"73I24 37"9<- "4* %"+ ,$-*" $<9:776789?896;< @!A;6?>? E/!*$@"*F$.&"*E/!*$@"*F$.*# 1/G"/ !E/!*$@"*F$ !" 6:86;896;<B*X#)*""*1#$=$ G1/);6;=;7=::66=6666$<6DI<H 6:86;896;<RG1/!4$+)*&!$0G$@!#*1"= G1/)<9;=66=:7H;=6666$;7<I<6 @!A$;6?>?$K "&)$$D::I9H $<9:77$K "&)2$D::I9H $D::I9H LXN"1";8;+9"KI4#;4#6"73I24 37";,*)=> %=+,* -$.*"&/)$P789:896;<$=$;;27>$ 3Q%&4*$;: !"#$%& ' !"()* +%,$-* LXX"1":#4O:3"K+24#6"5+;3I4+97" 8IKW"9<- "4* %"+ ,$-*" $<9:7:6789?896;< @!A9H9?<6 E/!*$@"*F$.&"*E/!*$@"*F$.*# 1/G"/ !E/!*$@"*F$ !" 67867896;<+ )5$3/\;6;=79=:9H6=6666$>DDIH6 @!A$9H9?<6$K "&)$$>DDIH6 $<9:7:$K "&)2$>DDIH6 $>DDIH6 LXX"1":#4O:3"K+24#6"5+;3I4+97" 8IKW";,*)=> NG."1"23I4Y8#"M4I39377"9<- "4* %"+ ,$-*" $<9:7H6789?896;< @!A>D<96:96D6 E/!*$@"*F$.&"*E/!*$@"*F$.*# 1/G"/ !E/!*$@"*F$ !" 678;9896;<S1&5c#$+*))=<;9=?<H=7H?9=698;78;<=678;98;<;6;=;?=:79;=6666$:DID: @!A$>D<96:96D6$K "&)$$:DID: $<9:7H$K "&)2$:DID: $:DID: NG."1"23I4Y8#"M4I39377";,*)=> N.0"1"M+I#3I" 8##3 ;"9<- "4* %"+ ,$-*" $66789?896;< @!A9>>9?>66 E/!*$@"*F$.&"*E/!*$@"*F$.*# 1/G"/ !E/!*$@"*F$ !" 6989>896;< 55/"/ !&)$R*1A/ *#$+,&14*=O*(;6;=;>=:79;=6666$77DIH6 @!A$9>>9?>66$K "&)$$77DIH6 $6$K "&)2$77DIH6 $77DIH6 N.0"1"M+I#3I" 8##3 ;";,*)=> N.."1"Z 39"3#3I6JC"4# W"9<- "4* %"+ ,$-*" $<9:7<6789?896;< @!A "aH;69?:<966=67;;96;< E/!*$@"*F$.&"*E/!*$@"*F$.*# 1/G"/ !E/!*$@"*F$ !" 678;;896;<H<HH$3*11'$E&!*$=$R"&"*F*!"$ !$678;;8;<;6;=H9=:7?6=6666$;<I;7 @!A$ "aH;69?:<966=67;;96;<$K "&)$$;<I;7 @!A "a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aH;:H7;D;;>=679;96;<$K "&)$$DY;:<I6< $<9:7<$K "&)2$DY;<9I;> $DY;<9I;> N.."1"Z 39"3#3I6JC"4# W";,*)=> P/Q"1"Z;I353"393 ;I4 +9"73I24 37C"4# W"9<- "4* %"+ ,$-*" $<9:7D6789?896;< @!A;<=D6;D E/!*$@"*F$.&"*E/!*$@"*F$.*# 1/G"/ !E/!*$@"*F$ !" 678;D896;<L*G)& *$Z)* "1/ &)$R*1A/ *=T&"*1$K X*1$L*,&(<6;=66=:99;=6666$;;YD?<IH9 @!A$;<=D6;D$K "&)$$;;YD?<IH9 $<9:7D$K "&)2$;;YD?<IH9 $;;YD?<IH9 P/Q"1"Z;I353"393 ;I4 +9"73I24 37C"4# W";,*)=> K "&)2$<<Y;7DI?9 %=+,* -$.*"&/)$P789:896;<$=$;;27>$ 3Q%&4*$;< ® 313 MEETING TYPE Ity of Shorewood nl Meeting l Item Regular Meeting ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Title/Subject: Accept Proposal for Professional Services for Preparation of Water Supply Plan. Meeting Date: March 28, 2016 Prepared by: Larry Brown, Director of Public Works Reviewed by: Jean Panchyshyn, City Clerk Attachments Proposal by WSB and Associates Policy Consideration: Should the City Council enter into an agreement with WSB and Associates, Inc. to prepare a Water Supply Plan for the Municipal Water System? Background: Under Minnesota State Statute 103G.29, all metropolitan cities that serve over 1000 people with their water system shall prepare a Water Supply Plan the outlines the existing water supply, projected water supply, emergency appropriations and procedures, and redundancy to the system. Deadlines for completion of such studies are phased in by City, as set by the DNR. For the City of Shorewood, this report must be completed by October of 2018. Staff is pursuing completion of this, well in advance of the deadline. Attachment 1 to this report is a proposal solicited by staff of WSB and Associates, Inc. The subject proposal covers the following areas: I. Water Supply System Description and Evaluation A. Analysis of Water Demand B. Treatment and Storage Capacity C. Water Sources D. Future Demand Projections E. Resource Sustainability F. Capital Improvement Plan II. Emergency Planning and Response Procedures III. Water Conservation Plan Component A. Progress since 2006 B. Triggers for Allocation and Demand Reduction Actions C. Conservation Objectives and Strategies IV. Demand Projections 2040 V. Project Management and Meetings Mission Statement: The City of Shorewood is committed to providing residents quality public services, a healthy environment, a variety of attractive amenities, a sustainable tax base, and sound financial management through effective, efficient, and visionary leadership. Page 1 Financial Considerations: Costs for preparation of the Water Supply Plan equal $13,000, and if approved will be funded from the City's Municipal Water Fund. Adequate resources exist in this fund to cover this expenditure. Options: 1. Accept the proposal, as presented. 2. Reject the proposal and provide staff with alternative direction. Recommendation: Staff is recommending approval of a Motion that accepts the proposal presented by WSB and Associates for preparation of a Water Supply Plan, not to exceed $13,000 and as outlined herein. WSB >.l li?ap�m y your li >.Ir,;y. 701 Xenia Avenue South Suite 300 Minneapolis,MN 55416 Tel: 763-541-4800 Fax: 763-541-1700 DATE: March 16, 2016 TO: Mr. Larry Brown, PE Director of Public Works 5755 Country Club Drive Shorewood, MN 55331 RE: PROPOSAL TO PROVIDE SERVICES TO COMPLETE THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD'S WATER SUPPLY PLAN Dear Mr. Brown: We are pleased to provide you with this proposal for services to assist the City of Shorewood (City) in completion of its Water Supply Plan (Plan) as required by the Minnesota Division of Natural Resources (DNR). Our multi-faceted team includes professionals in Water/Wastewater, Water Resources, City Planning, and GIS; ensuring that the City's Plan will be a cohesive document that will not only meet state regulations but will be a useful planning document throughout the next decade. Not only does WSB have the technical skills to deliver high-quality Plans, but we are also experienced in navigating the regulatory process required for such submittals. The combination of our technical expertise and project management experience ensures an exceptional final product that will also include the majority of information required for the City's 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update. Below is description of the required components and the method by which WSB will address them in the City's Water Supply Plan. Task One:Water Supply System Description and Evaluation 1.1 Analysis of Water Demand Using the City's Wellhead Protection Plan alongside appropriations permits and water use data, WSB will evaluate the past ten years of water demand data.The per capita usage and number of connections, large quantity users, and water used for essential versus non-essential uses will be considered, among other factors. 1.2 Treatment and Storage Capacity An evaluation of the City's existing treatment and storage will be conducted. WSB will outline the treatment process and compare the capacity of treated water versus the demand. 1.3 Water Sources Three types of resources will be considered:groundwater, surface water, and interconnection. We will evaluate emergency interconnections and determine if there are any deficiencies. Equal Opportunity Employer ATTACHMENT 1 wsbeng.com M:\WaterWastewater\Proposals\Water Supply Plans\LTR PROP-Shorewood-Water Supply Plan.docx Mr. Larry Brown March 17, 2016 Page 2 1.4 Future Demand Projections Future demand projections are listed as a Key Metropolitan Council Benchmark. Using data compiled in the previous sections, WSB will determine what trends, if any, are seen. We will attempt to determine the cause behind any significant patterns. Using this analysis,the Plan will project demands through 2040 by estimating population served, per capita water demand, and peak water usage. 1.5 Resource Sustainability WSB will outline water quality and quantity monitoring efforts currently undertaken by the City. From this data, it will be determined if there are any potential water supply issues or natural resource impacts as a result of permitted withdrawals. Each natural resource type will be evaluated to determine if water usage will have a negative impact.The results of the City's Wellhead Protection and Source Water Protection Plans will be described. 1.6 Capital Improvement Plan The adequacy of each component of the existing water supply system will be determined.This includes wells, storage and treatment facilities, and distribution systems. Proposed future water sources will be outlined as well as any alternatives available.WSB will consider the feasibility of water reuse, including reclaimed stormwater and/or wastewater, as well as interconnection to nearby suppliers. Task Two: Emergency Planning and Response Procedures WSB will describe the current status of the City's 1) Federal Emergency Response Plan; 2) Operational Contingency Plan; and 3) Emergency Response Procedures. We will include in the Emergency Response Procedures the method by which the City will augment water supplies (if required), the allocation and demand reduction procedures, any emergency demand reduction conditions or triggers in place, and several other related items. Task Three:Water Conservation Plan Component 3.1 Progress since 2006 WSB will describe any initiatives the City has undertaken since its last Water Supply Plan was approved by the DNR. Conservation practices the City is implementing — such as pricing, regulations, and education—will be included. 3.2 Triggers for Allocation and Demand Reduction Actions This section will include future conditions and actions during a Governor's "Critical Water Deficiency Order" or other instances in which usage reductions must occur. WSB will work with the City to determine what triggers should be selected to initiate short-or long-term demand reductions, and what actions will be taken should such an instance arise. 3.3 Conservation Objectives and Strategies This section of the Plan serves as a Key Benchmark for the DNR. It will include strategies by which the City will reduce unaccounted for water loss. The DNR has set a goals for each community, including the M:\WaterWastewater\Proposals\Water Supply Plans\LTR PROP-Shorewood-Water Supply Plan.docx Mr. Larry Brown March 17, 2016 Page 3 following: 1) Reaching 75 gallons per capita of water usage daily; 2) Achieving at least a 1.5% per year reduction for industrial, commercial, and agricultural water use; 3) Decreasing the trend in total per capita demand; 5) Reducing the City's peaking factor to less than 2.6; 6) Implementing a conservation water rate structure; and 7) Support Wellhead Protection Planning. WSB will work with the City to highlight the goals that have already been achieved and to outline the method the City will implement to achieve the remaining benchmarks. Included in the analysis will be possible regulatory changes, retrofitting potential, and educational programs. Task Four: Items for Metropolitan Area Water Suppliers Because the City is within the seven-county metropolitan area, the Metropolitan Council requires additional information. WSB will include in the Plan water demand projections through 2040, potential water supply issues, possible approaches to meet extended water demand projections, and value-added water supply planning efforts (if desired by the City). Task Five: Proiect Management,Coordination,and Meetings Project management is a key task included in each project undertaken by WSB. This task consists of management and administration, project coordination, and overall communication with the City and DNR. Proper completion of this task will help keep all affected parties routinely updated and informed regarding project issues, as well as keep the project on schedule and within budget. The proposed work plan will include one City Council meeting and two meetings with the City prior to finalizing the Plan. Task Six: Estimated Fee WSB will complete the proposed work plan as proposed herein on lump sum basis with a fee of$13,000. The hourly breakdown by task for each employee class proposed for the project is included on the attached spreadsheet.The proposed fee is based on our 2015 rate schedule. Sincerely, WSB&Associates, Inc. Greg Johnson, PE Project Manager ACCEPTED BY: City of Shorewood Name Title Date M:\WaterWastewater\Proposals\Water Supply Plans\LTR PROP-Shorewood-Water Supply Plan.docx 8 8 8 8 8 8 § � y < f\ « _ / d \ § § § S o m e � R r w o : � ) 0 R \ R 7 3 E § S S 2 $ \ _ CL C?§ � \ G k _ _ a / 2 £ ) d L k § § g ^ � / \ E-L CL LU f CL� k 6 k �CO k a § § � L k � j=) § $ ] R 6 / 0 4) X22 § k § ) ) = = . 2 w m § 0 a » ; z e ) 2 a 2 / Z o } / ) q ; § A CID % \ \ 2 § £ '0 o j CL a - o . a / \ / / m $ \ \ j 3 7 i 0 ° / 2 - / E / a ) . o g ] \ CO ; ) o E ) k 7 � E a E t -lo CL / k k) ) �\\ Co ° ° ) ) \ \ ) i ) w ƒ co co ) \ 2 \ 2 ! . t ) _ n _ 0 o0 / w w = w ! #3C MEETING TYPE City of Shorewood Council Meeting Item Regular Meeting .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Title/Subject: Resolution Accepting Plans,Specifications and Authorizing Advertisement for Bids for the 2016 Crack Fill and Seal Coat Project,City Project 16-01 Meeting Date: March 28, 2016 Prepared by: Paul Hornby Reviewed by: Attachments: Resolution, Location Maps Background: The City annually provides for maintenance of City streets as part of the Street Reconstruction Fund as a seal coating project. Streets scheduled for the 2016 Crack Fill and Seal Coat Project,to receive seal coating improvements, are illustrated on the enclosed location map. The attached Resolution approves the plans and specifications and authorizes the advertisement for bids. As in past years,the 2016 Crack Fill and Seal Coat Project is a cooperative effort with the cities of Victoria and Minnetrista to provide cost effective bidding and construction. Financial or Budget Considerations: The Capital Improvement Plan budget in the Street Reconstruction Fund is$245,000 for the 2016 Crack Fill and Seal Coat Project. Options: 1. Approve the resolution accepting Plans, Specifications and Authorizing Advertisement for Bids for the 2016 Crack Fill and Seal Coat Project, City Project 16-01. 2. Direct Staff to modify the roadways designated for seal coating. 3. Take no action at this time. Recommendation/Action Requested: Staff recommends approval of the Resolution approving plans and specifications for the 2016 Crack Fill and Seal Coat Project, and authorizes advertisement for bids. Mission Statement: The City of Shorewood is committed to providing residents quality public services, a healthy environment, a variety of attractive amenities, a sustainable tax base, and sound financial management through effective, efficient, and visionary leadership. Page 1 CITY OF SHOREWOOD RESOLUTION NO. 16- A RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND AUTHORIZING ADVERTISEMENTS FOR BIDS 2016 CRACKFILL AND SEAL COAT PROJECT CITY PROJECT 16-01 WHEREAS, the City of Shorewood designates $245,000 for seal coating; and WHEREAS, the Pavement Management Plan identifies streets within the City that need maintenance by seal coating; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has prepared Specifications for the 2016 Crack Fill and Seal Coat Project, City Project 16-01, in accordance with the Pavement Management Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Shorewood, Minnesota: 1. The Specifications were prepared by the City Engineer for such improvement. Said Specifications are hereby approved and shall be filed with the City Clerk. 2. The City Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official paper and according to Minnesota State Law an advertisement for bids, upon the making of such improvement under such approved plans and specifications. The advertisement shall be published for 3 weeks, shall specify the work to be done, shall state that bids will be opened and considered by the city at the specified time and date, in the City Hall Council Chambers, and that no bids will be considered unless sealed and filed with the Clerk and accompanied by a cash deposit, cashier's check, bid bond, or certified check payable to the Clerk for 5 percent of the amount of each bid. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD this 28h day of March, 2016. ATTEST: Scott Zerby, Mayor Jean Panchyshyn, City Clerk /'� ` 111111.. . ���= \\� 1111►:� IM���•�►! ; OEM mum �VIII oil ak MIN f�1` � 111 ='fir:� ,�•-:�="I�� .••� 0 ������►� - :: �., - ,. .• �. ���� �� II .III - MIN ■■l • -in �j�•� SRI �1��111. _ ,� ��■��� ,��� ,,• !� i` ���1 ���� 1► rat #7A CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB RD PARK COMMISSION MEETING SHOREWOOD CITY HALL TUESDAY, MARCH 22, 2016 7:00 P.M. MINUTES 1. CONVENE PARK COMMISSION MEETING Chair Mangold convened the meeting at 7:00 p.m. A. Roll Call ; Present: Chair Mangold, Commissioners Vassar, Stelmachers, Kobs and Rock City Council Liaison Labadie; City Planner Nielsen; Finance Director Bruce DeJong Absent: None B. Review Agenda Kobs moved to approve the agenda as written: add a quick review of the joint City Council meeting as Item 5. Vassar seconded the motion. Motion carried 5-0. 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. Park Commission Meeting Minutes of March 8, 2016 Kobs moved to approve the minutes of the March 8, 2016 meeting as written. Rock seconded the motion. Motion carried 5-0. 3. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR There were none. 4. UPDATE ON BADGER FIELD Nielsen stated since the joint meeting with the Council, staff met with the sports groups to discuss the shortfall. He discussed the FieldTurf quote. He stated the civil scope is the bulk of the project. He stated $10,000 would be subtracted out for work the city would provide. He also changed the fence amount to $5,087.03, and the #6 alternate was reduced to $29,375.49. He discussed the shortfall amount of $91,564.57 plus/minus $1,000. He stated this item would be on the City Council agenda on March 28. He stated Finance and Administration have indicated the money would be available for the work. It could begin as soon as road restrictions have been lifted. In response to a question from Rock, Nielsen discussed the drainage on the site. The bid margin was discussed. Mangold stated he still had questions about specific items in the bid such as the fencing. He suggested it could be removed and asked if it was even needed. Nielsen noted it was needed to PARK COMMISSION MINUTES TUESDAY, MARCH 22, 2016 3 PAGE 2 OF protect the netting from the sidewalk. Mangold asked how long the fence section would be. Steve Well stated it is to be determined and indicated it would be better to have on the south end. If there isn’t any traffic around it, there would be no need for it. He indicated the netting is shown as the width of the field. He believed there could be some savings when it is determined how much of it would be needed. He stated it would be better to come in with the higher number rather than coming in low. Rock stated he liked the not-to-exceed number. He asked if there would be any other field that could be looked at. Well stated it has been assumed the soil would not be good when the sand base depth was determined. Nielsen stated it is junk soil, and it is deep. Stelmachers asked if he believed the bid was appropriate. Well stated the numbers were bid at the worst case scenario. Commissioners discussed the practice field and the cost which would be borne by the lacrosse association. Well explained the purpose of the practice area. He stated they could live without it but were sure they would be able to raise the money for it. Mangold discussed the lacrosse association’s commitment to getting the field constructed. He stated this is an exciting opportunity. Nielsen suggested meeting with the civil engineer to negotiate the civil amount. Labadie stated the two councilmembers and Mayor agreed we could move forward following the joint meeting. Mangold moved, Stelmachers seconded, to recommend approval of the FieldTurf’s bid at a not to exceed of $650,000 with an explanation from FieldTurf on the 1-year warranty. Nielsen stated finalized numbers would be provided at the meeting on Monday. Motion carried 5-0. 5. UPDATE ON JOINT MEETING WITH CITY COUNCIL Mangold stated there was discussion of the concept plan and budget as we move forward. The direction was to move forward with the concept plan. He believed we need to get the Engineer more involved with the plan. DeJong stated there wasn’t anything specific at this point relating to the cost of the first phase. He did indicate there would be enough money to construct the play field. Nielsen stated we are good for now. Vassar asked if there was anything the Commission should be working on now. Nielsen stated there is a need for details as this is only a concept plan at this point. Commissioners and staff discussed the park configuration. PARK COMMISSION MINUTES TUESDAY, MARCH 22, 2016 3 PAGE 3 OF Mangold stated his biggest question was what needs to get done and in what order. He stated he would like engineering to provide more detail on information on sewer lines, for example. Nielsen stated there could be a couple different ways to proceed, and they would work out the best way. 6. NEW BUSINESS 7. STAFF AND LIAISON REPORTS/UPDATES A. City Council B. Staff 8. ADJOURN Stelmachers moved, Kobs seconded, to adjourn the Park Commission Meeting of March 22, 2016 at 7:53 p.m. Motion carried 5-0. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, Clare T. Link Recorder #7B MEETING TYPE City of Shorewood Council Meeting Item Regular Meeting Title / Subject: Badger Field – Authorize Staff to Proceed With Cooperative Purchase Agreement - FieldTurf Meeting Date: 28 March 2016 Prepared by: Brad Nielsen Reviewed by: Patti Helgesen Attachments: FieldTurf Proposal Policy Consideration: Should the City budget additional funds and contract with FieldTurf for the construction of an artificial turf playfield in Badger Park? Background: City staff and Minnetonka Lacrosse representatives have obtained quotes from two vendors for the construction of an artificial turf playfield in Badger Park. As was explained at earlier meetings, the costs of building the field are higher than the original $525,000 that was available from the HCYSP grant, the City’s portion, and Lacrosse and Football contributions. Initially the shortfall appeared to be plus or minus $100,000. Working with the vendors, particularly FieldTurf, the current estimate of cost comes to $635,160. This is down approximately $10,000 from what the Park Commission saw at its 22 March meeting, at which time they recommended to go forward with the project at a cost not to exceed $650,000. Financial or Budget Considerations: At present Minnetonka Lacrosse has agreed to pay an additional $30,000 toward the shortfall, leaving $80,160 remaining, should the City agree to pick up the difference. Options: Agree to cover the $80,160 shortfall and authorize staff to work with FieldTurf on a cooperative purchase agreement; reject the quotes; authorize a different City contribution. Recommendation / Action Requested: Staff is seeking direction as to whether to continue with the project. Next Steps and Timelines: FieldTurf has indicated that they can start work approximately 1 May, following road restrictions. Connection to Vision / Mission: Attractive amenities. Mission Statement: The City of Shorewood is committed to providing residents quality public services, a healthy environment, a variety of attractive amenities, a sustainable tax base, and sound financial management through effective, efficient, and visionary leadership. Page 1 #8B MEETING TYPE City of Shorewood Council Meeting Item Regular Meeting .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Title/Subject: Hauser—C.U.P.for Accessory Space in Excess of 1200 Square Feet Meeting Date: 28 March 2016 Prepared by: Brad Nielsen Reviewed by: Patti Helgesen Attachments: Staff Report, dated 10 March 2016 Draft Resolution Policy Consideration: Should the Council grant a conditional use permit for accessory space in excess of 1200 square feet, allowing for the preservation of a nonconforming structure with historic and cultural significance? Background: Bradley Hauser is building a new home at 5640 Covington Road. The proposed attached garage,when combined with the area of an existing nonconforming pumphouse structure exceeds 1200 square feet in area, requiring approval of a conditional use permit. For additional background, see attached staff report, dated 10 March 2016. Financial or Budget Considerations: The construction of the new home,with its attached garage enhances the tax base for Shorewood. Options: Adopt the draft resolution as recommended by the Planning Commission; modify the resolution; or deny the request for a conditional use permit. Recommendation/Action Requested: It is recommended that the resolution be adopted, approving the C.U.P. Next Steps and Timelines: Applicant must record the resolution within 30 days of the Council's approval. Connection to Vision/Mission: Preservation of the old pumphouse is viewed as contributing an interesting amenity to the area and construction of the new home and garage contributes to a sustainable tax base. Mission Statement: The City of Shorewood is committed to providing residents quality public services, a healthy environment, a variety of attractive amenities, a sustainable tax base, and sound financial management through effective, efficient, and visionary leadership. Page 1 MEMORANDUM TO Planning Commission, Mayor and City Council FROM: Brad Nielsen DATE: 10 March 2016 RE: Hauser, Bradley — Conditional Use Permit Accessory Space in Excess of 1200 Square Feet FILE NO.: 405 (16.03) BACKGROUND Mr. Bradley Hauser is building a new home at 5640 Covington Road (see Site Location map — Exhibit A, attached). The floor area of the attached garage for the home, combined with an old pump house structure near the lake, exceeds 1200 square feet, necessitating a conditional use permit pursuant to Section 1201.03 Subd. 2.d.(4) of the Shorewood Zoning Code. The subject property (see Exhibit B) contains 82,795 square feet of area and is zoned R- 1A/S, Single- Family Residential /Shoreland. The proposed home will have 3422 square feet of floor area above grade on the main level (see Exhibit C). Elevations of the new house are shown on Exhibits D and E. The new attached garage contains 1129 square feet of area. The existing pump house (Exhibit F) has 230 square feet of floor area. If approved, the total amount of accessory space on the site will be 1359 square feet. The total percentage of impervious surface on the site will be 15.71 percent. ISSUES AND ANALYSIS Following is how the applicant's request complies with Section 1201.03 Subd. 2.d.(4): I" 41®016 PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER Memorandum Re: Hauser C.U.P. 10 March 2016 1. The total area of accessory space (1359 square feet) does not exceed the floor area above grade of the new home (3422 square feet — main level). 2. The total area of accessory -space does not exceed ten percent of the minimum lot size for the R -IA/S zoning district (.10 x 40,000 = 4000 square feet). 3. The old pump house is nonconforming with respect to its setback from the lake. The location of the building is mitigated somewhat by the fact that the building is tucked into the hillside. The applicants have cited the provisions of Section 1201.03 Subd. 2.d:(4)(e) as justification for retaining the old pump house. In 2007, the City adopted an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan setting forth its intention to recognize and preserve special structures in Shorewood. This was followed by an amendment to the zoning regulations, providing for the preservation of certain nonconforming structures that have historical, architectural, or cultural significance. Mr. Hauser believes the pump house is consistent with the criteria for keeping such structures. a. The applicant has submitted an aerial photo dating back to 1956 which shows the subject building (see Exhibit G). b. While the structure has not been inspected by the Building Official as of this writing, preliminary observation of the building in question suggests it is in good condition. As can be seen on Exhibit F, some cosmetic work on the building will be necessary. It is recommended that, as a condition of approval, the building be maintained in some sort of earth tone color. C. Mr. Hauser's application states: "The pump house is visible in historic pictures. Likely used to draw water from the lake to supply adjacent homes. Adds a historical character to the property. Removing the building could be more disruptive'through erosion or other as the pump house is built into the sloping hill ". 4. The issue of architectural compatibility between the accessory and principal structures is somewhat of a moot point. The attached garage is obviously an integral part of the home. The pump house is discreetly tucked into the hillside and separated from the house by distance, grade and vegetation. RECOMMENDATION The applicant's plans are consistent with the Code requirements for accessory space and historic structures. Approval of the C.U.P. is recommended. Cc: Bill Joynes Tim Keane Joe Pazandalc Bradley Hauser -2- m s � a � L Mull m . G �L � U) IL / o (D CD LL � n Y, A .� n z�0 0 0 M o a FA my \a1 Hauser CUP Exhibit A SITE LOCATION Hauser CUP De °� e113 i i i i \ SITE PLAN FOR: \ HENDEL HOMES \` - - - -- _ 15250 Wayzata Blvd., Suite 108 11 II It i ------ 1 \, II I 1� 1, I, 1,� ,1 I I I' 1 I \\\� Wayzata, MN 55391 I 1 I I \`\ \\\ \\ \'RGypt 1 ' N i / % I I \\ / I •' .�lr I 1 I I I I 1 \ �\ \ \\ $1, 9FROOF THE MISCELLANEOUS NOTES 9'7..6 ret _ Property located in Section 36, Township 117, Range 23, _. _._.T._._.t- ._._•1 , r 1 \ \\ `\ _ rN2.6 Hennepin County, Dfinaesotn. \`\ ` \\ 1\ 2JY,ee A r / ar.r ]i3.4 _. _.J ._._ ' ._. /.'._._. - - k' -'� \'- \ \ f "-r^3 _otr _V__I 1 S /Ic! , o `\ \`.. V e9362 9 v + �M-1 / ,� pro cr / i i 1 ` i Av v 1, i ' v ' �` v `v 1 _ Property Address: 5GW Covington Road, Shorewood, AiN \ \ / n 936 � I H •'a• / / I \ 1 I \ 1 1 1 ``\ t o Benchmark: To (manhole atsoutheastmmeroE n shown \ \\ Trm6erl •'P °4y6 Ly't / % / / I \ \ 1 1 1 1 I rB _ 1 I \it- , Top ro.4 , n \ Prope y as s \ \\ \ \ 1 I 1 I I ` hereon 93rI \ / / sal + \ 934.- I \I I_ \-. 3J•t I I / / 9566 i / / I ' / 1 \ \ \ 1 I I I 1 I I I I 1 r 1 I \ I Elevation = 984.36 feet I I I ; •\ 11/936.1 1 r'4e2 h s I 1 .'e" ' I 1 I I 2 \ ry' ( /= Per pa // / / � / / / 1 / /5 ' �F-- -) 1 I I / 1 I 1 IQ I 1 p \ \au.� n9as \\ \ \ \ t\ -`` Ordinary High \C'ater Elevation OH \C 932.77 Department of ;+ } =yt 94p.1' / i / / / 1 / /;a y / 1 T I I Natural Resumes. 1 I m \ \ I / V I I To Ee acc.ml -sc % / / ] / 1 / / 1 1 } II 1 / I I ° `•VA�iCKl9. 11 / 3'' I <�) Pro is wooded, perfy l °Cr / , \ 't,`• � - requirements per City Ordinance (main stmctu[e) Property Zoned R -L1 Residential Building Setback Fmnn 50 feet lOf t Side s3 /.9 \I\ 0 1 1 1 I 1 I I 1yy1 / / / o / / I i i ' i ILeel \• my 3" \\ ��' /�/ / \ OH\\' -75 feet I� °� i o It 1 1 i 1 i 1 2 \ \\ \ arnv= s3z.n ° ;' i i i l 6 /, N 4 I I 1 I 1 'v. 1 n I ry / / I I 1 1 \ I \ SCALE N FEET per O'fR m 1� P o / // r O W M N , 1 j1 I G 66 C 6! a PRO¢OSE� WALLSm d 1393.8 \\ // / 0 2) 40 60 1 n 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 I / // / u y I i� I I 1 I I 1 \•\ \ \ 1 , 1 /\ 1 999.2 /\ 0 Denotes FWnd 4on 0.lonument o 0 � 0, I , 1 \ Denotes Imn Monument / I ' o '`\' \\ h\ / ' , / i /°j / 1 11 \ _ 9. _t 14Y.o ti `t, \\ ogri % I N 6x \ \`\ 9 \ 3�6" I p � r I �" \ \ \ 1� \\ , ' -y0\ / \ .L'Lb.O Denotes Existing FJevation _``_ I 1 66" I \ 9934 99l F t, • / 9'4 11 \'\ ° / ' \ \ \ 3 � \ \ \ \ \ / � Denotes Ewsl6g Contour /j/r l 'i/ y/ / 10'0' \ f°r 000.0 o-�s Pmp ®9�.atan /` ' 6 i 83.5 1 , q 1 sl 1 1 I /150.8 1� �/ / 1 ey e\ i `.o \ '\c I ,♦3 2 / / \ e�inss is -uvnra sufue pmlcy° ml 1 1 1 1 I I/ 1 4e 1 1 I O/ 10'6` / / 1 1 , I I C I I I I I °9A.a ( � 1 1 .\ •� I I ; � `H I I 1 I I A I/ 1 n l m� /� � I � / I a \ ''' 1 1 ` \�, 1 1 �i l \Ice i' I '1 i } I 1 I�oPOSSO wIIILLS i i =i / i i �\ i % 4 I x i A� 'i i Al \ I l y e9.7/ 'JO / I \� / \ 978.85 Proposed MtF r P I \° ` \� \ I 1 \A l I i s 9 I I 1 \ / aJ/ /; 9., % �i.4 i \\ I 1 N- B Z \\ lr 978.70 5 r' =a o-.. 9 l 1 \ 1 4ero' / s �. % I e3. - ' / _ - - -- _ I /f` /('' / \ 1 / llivc- I� \ l Pmpnsed rap afabtic °�� j 978.0 proposed Gar,Ma,, I / 968.0 Pm"— Lbnest Flow i t 1 - / I I , I Y / I 1 I I 1 ri996 ] I / , % / / \ •? !� tIn.r.SED DRIVEWAY 1 I I I / / I I I 1 - `6 - / I 1 I 1 I 1 / / / l - / /•\ / /' ,)' 1(i\ 1 � ' \•\ 4epvv / No , / , l / \ / PROPOSED HARDCOVER O II N / 1 ', I / % I 1 1 I ll 1 I ' / I op�.p °,, / ly n ' fi95.4 I I / •\ s 3 / 1 / / \ Residence +4667 sq.ft \\ r ] 5't Driveway / \ Porch +3286 ft In 1, / 1 / / / I 1 1 R'•. /914.2 / s.� .5 \` I o4 - _ ; ��._. .L. . -._._. _._._.1.._._._._._ - _ _._._._ ._._._._._.IL._._._._ %L._._._.] ; j 1 J jtal / q. / / Driveway +4798 sq.ft Walks 6 Patios +2167 sq.ft pavement to lake +1051sq.ft S 89 °1 II I 16 / / / / i i ._l_.- 1._._. _.')�_._._._. ]µ•hr z y q � . '43?fSi •_ _•1_._.�r' __ o W 211,08 z2° / ___ 1 t 1 i 93l ' / / ' I / ex�: 90' / I •� 3' s,e 3 "�"� "` - , 3orr« 1'1 J" / /' / "s / \ \ 1 Total Hardcover= 13011 sq.ft 99x. e0r,re 1 1 ] 9slo \ 1 ; Area of Parcel = 82795 ±5 ft z6s 2 — — top= 9Baa2' L — Percentage of Hardcover 15.711% - -' -- t S8 .54 �t, orow.> �n / I �/ - -r- - - -- -1 rlA�'r —, 9 i 1 4"S Sr' / 1 ' rrrl %ry DP 0 1 \ 11 % % 0 T1 I I I O 10� / %O % orb, % ' 2 ia; q� e�/ 90' D 1 m �\..1, / 11 j ' j t 1 i %i %�G i�p %NID�i //, 91 i'� ,6'/ I e31d i/ Legal Description Certification 1 'prat pan of Govemment Lot 4, Section 36,'1'o—hip 117, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minor— described as follows: Commencing at a point on the north and south centerline of said i I rf / / / / / / / / / / / Section 36 a distance of 793 feet Nonh from the south line of said Government I -.t 4 as Prepared by. measured along said centerline; thence on an assumed hearing of \C'cst paralldwith the south line The Gregory Group, Inc. d.b.a. of said Govemment Lot 4 a distance .17265.25 feet to the point ofbegi -ni.9 of the land being Lot Surveys Company The only easementssbovm are from plats ofreeard or lnformnum described; thence Northerly 9 feet pandlel with the north and south centerline of said Section 36; 7601 73rd Avenue N. provided by dnL / / / / / / / / / / / ] / // thence F steely to the centerline of Covington Road along a line which if estended would Smoklyn Park MN 55428 imersect said north and south centerline of said Sectron 36 a distance of 805 feet North from the phone 763- 560 -3093 1—bry out Ws plan, speci5ralfon, or repot was prepared by me / / / fax 763 -560 -3522 r Mer my tlPeq supervision and that I em a duty Lkensee IarM /i /% %' ' ' ' ' ' / south Gne of said Government Lot 4; thence Northwesterly along the centerline of said Survayer under the laws ofthe State of P.Onnesola. Covington Road to a point 988.9 feet North from the south line of said Government Lot 4 as measured at right angles with said south line; thence North 83 degrees 34 minutes 30 seconds 5urosved this 3rd day of september 2015. West 160 feer, thence South 87 degrees 55 minutes 30 seconds West to the shore of Chrism— Rsv- Iake; thence Southerly along the shore of said Lake to a line bearing west from the point of 9 -15- 15 hardcover beginning; thence East to the point of beginning. Except Road. Signed: Grego P ch Reglamstion No. 24992 - -, x117- z1- + Exhibit B PROPERTY SURVEY IIP -0° 5' -6° 4' -0' 15 -0' 6' -0' 20' -0° 10' -0° 15,_0• 1� T -0° 4' -D° WE T -6" T -6° 3'-0" 3' -0' 10' -0" 10' -0° 5' -0° 5' -0' T -6" T 6' CL PERGOLA REMOVED I 1 RETRACTABLE SCREENS EA C OPUG � H All All A13 ------ ; GIR— DER•TR —USS i ��'• �`O. PATIO BELOW a I s I - V CARDLEVERABOVE I ° SCREEN PORCH �� G r -o° J r -o° I ," -r C14 A75 2- 1 I� 1\`J E - - -- D — — — — — H — — _O_ — C,/i:.%sI�rilC Sl��k'llfix r v 1, - I � elu 42�t1�Et3 - - -- - - - -- - - - - --' 0 TEMP. GLASS__ -- ______.TEMP. GLASS_ _ ___TEh9P. GLASS. NT`•� � ----- -i r -� � 11x9('`,. d_s... ?'.� %12:(f• -64 i�1 R kl� .[ 1).V-T, ..,}9Cd. OPE % -ENG ROOF TRUSSES g 11 I I I - B m..° 9kmx j-bm�T c 19 1 I tt' I BREAKFAST I ' O , 14 A72 -0x11 1 5 1' -0 °CAMILEVERABOVE ? � ` It UTATED Fft tCLI gIDR /COtLT.IIISULAT 011 I T_______ ; �I'��� i i ___ � _�I�: I h 1�1F ���•: \y�+''�i'' 1' ___ '� _ O /'- -� - - -� - '"�`' ° Al BUILT -IN CABS. W /COUNTER I BOXED BEAM GIG. -hi i i 1 _ --------------- L _ ---- - - - --1 a l i I i 1 A15 i i H L i 1 I r_ I a :ris j LASS v I II r r( G CABINETS 1 y it GREAT ROOM I dt 110- 0x4 -6 BUTCHER BLOCKISLAND I I I � � 1 a I I)+1 I I " 19- 0x21 -4 _ l I °o I SHELVES w.l - ' ��• - AL+tiYr`uTx]t }E_4^tl5fix tuY!., Y::e; '¢ i 1 C. I rT 1 I I I II I ° A75 13) dJ i 13 i I �l 4 r SHELVES ] I I I I I i I I I I Iw ,I F m g i I DW )I 1 1i dl I o $III , PO z ° i I I I F t,•r 9P '-&5N 314 6° LL 10-3 x 12-6 V/\BOEDBEN.CG. ISLAND F 33 REF I t ? CLOSET I AUE i ______ l -2 -11 -0° J /16'- 1114-312° Y 0 12 „ ; 1 I F IS . T -0"_ i p p Ii I i < 14'- 8114' -- , SERVICE oW , KITCHEN I P15 SHELVES ~�I , HALL GLASS I I I ; 1 23-11x10 -7 1 2 1 11 I - -' - -- -' MSTERBEDROO r I I I I 1 I! CABINETS �°-� 1 11 I (- r I t LL I I I I I I ,,, I 1 ° BUILT -IN CLOSET i I ss - II II I 14,- 011119 -2 &8x4.1 I i I 1 I ` I I L - -- --------------- - - - - -- - - -- -- - -' i — 7 J I { ^ I m BsA—S. K..E. - T_B- _ A LL - KEY - -50A6 FL C- .- O. - -- 1-_ srL -_n- _ - - - _. • ".,.- m. '..� Rt1:Y4=47- 11 / _ 4 'LVL ,.-, 0 .� `/ - - - 5- - - - - - —l�l - t_ - 1 —4k i.8'LrI - 1- 3t 4 :7.1lP LVL xi f ^)ifi}!H A�t)?1P t':`rV.ti1�TS��lYr"1A ' 11 I T7(1r rF + I -- F 3O AR 0 OPN 1' -312' U 4'•02 -° ------- _ Y-81 _ r LL �I ,Grip, c - SPORTS CLOS. � � - � I ,,1 U ;sf{J,. � lg i. °I }-�i1 U T t£ , I 1 �--- ,- - - - --) 1 '•` 4oeo c.o. _ ��; � .�. - - - -- -� lzNa4ksfrr LVL - - -- - UP 19R a B 1 r I ARCHEDOPNG GARAGE 11 fi d I I i 27- 0x47 -0 I I TALL HANG. I ; �F T ° - - -- I - - -- - -- -- `•-` 2 1 DN 17R -- - _ � I j 1 � r> .�•,�, -�i 7wwsoif aeovE �� 1 I F A01ANT IN -FLOOR HEAT 17 $ BENCH I 8 HOOKS II I I I SHORT HANG. ) I I I i" I 12 A15 17 FINISHED GARAGE FLOOR AREA= 1129 SF a - I I. '-r ji �-- i �H I I PIANO y N FOYER i 6 •'. 1 e P �� I m �' 3 WASH d I 9 xIO-1p CLOSET i M TER BATH - -L - -- UDROOM LINDR >..,. �; N L ,T rc I 1- I I '� I I I LINEN 14.0 12.8 LINEN 1 s- toxlz -s bwxlas �I � � I A s -zxto� 1 NNN 'I BENCH a — �i DINING ROOMl9 I I 1_{ _ _� ^' DRY 13-0x15.4 I I 2' -z° 4' -812° 2' -512, 4 I T 1° I h I I I _z -' — --- - - --- L L I ° I° i z s ° T 8° 3'•8 3' -51/4 A75 io> I I : I 9 A15 7 � '` ° i x }9 I I 15 STEAJA 'I t SLOPE FLOOR SLAB 4 °TO DRAINS o L 8 L I I I I i POWDER d l SHELVES >; - .jG1IIII I h 9HOWEi +l .. i�v�i�"ZJ. �- �se5i,�£., i- L 1' -3314 tiT '�3. -A .�r as=,x.' - CAB. BENCH CAB i' -41 y 9 1 72YJ6 °TUB y A 1'•0° 4 j r Iemu• �- :azrr:,�-� F• MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN /F= r -o' LIVING SPACE iL 2158 SF 3084 SF L 2008 S 7251 SF ADDITIONAL SPACE MECHANICALI STORAGE 499 SF LAKESTORAGE 230 SF GARAGE ' 11295F FRONTPORCH 2578 N N � ro N N a 5 aa d Q N N O 3 n N 0 0 N 0 FLOOR PLAN —MAIN LEVEL c 0 m p R tl ; Y_4" AS ROOF RAN AG FRONT ELEVATION A7 RIGHT ELEVATION AB LAKESIDE ELEVATION A5 LEFfEEVATON 3' -6' GEN. CONTRACTOR HENDELTIONIC5 Y_q^ V I) _ Hf RESIDENCE MEETING X X X X X PP PROGRZ55 X X X X TEMP.GLASS I I FR TP0 H - - GIRDERTR0.— - - - - - - - - - . WICAPB ROUND COLUMNS BASE TRIM .JN.i0 i.HEI3HT __ _ _ _ —_ — L OPENINGS A L- RMY, FIR: STOf 3i PO MOW I' — - - - - - - RAISED FDN. WALL (TO. WALL @$82.77 2 I OXR U 2K �(aame km, i -, = (3) INT. LOUVERED SHUTTERS A1P .Y I L rr IL f i L RETAINING WALL AS ER SURVEY RETAINING WALL AS PER SURVEY 1'•8' p_g° g'_4° _p° 1 3' -6° 6'•0' 3' -6" T -6' T -6' 32-0' 4'_0• oa _n 13' -0° 16'•0° 4p' 0° T -6' T v MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN /F= r -o' LIVING SPACE iL 2158 SF 3084 SF L 2008 S 7251 SF ADDITIONAL SPACE MECHANICALI STORAGE 499 SF LAKESTORAGE 230 SF GARAGE ' 11295F FRONTPORCH 2578 15 -0" 20' Exhibit C ��F..shunt 7I }� AI ERE PLAN AS MAIN LOWER LEVEL PLAN A3 MAIN LEVEL PLAN A4 UPPER LEVEL RAN AI4INTERIOR FIEVATION5 AI5 INTERIOR FLEVATIONS A I G INTERIOR ELEVATIONS A17 BUILDING DETAILS ARCHITECT 5HARRA7T DESIGN 4 CA, LLC. COMACT. JA50N LUCAS ISSUED FOR n o n o "� N N � ro N N a 5 aa d Q N N O 3 n N 0 0 N 0 FLOOR PLAN —MAIN LEVEL c 0 m p R tl ; �r AS ROOF RAN AG FRONT ELEVATION A7 RIGHT ELEVATION AB LAKESIDE ELEVATION A5 LEFfEEVATON AI 8 BUILDING DETAILS El LOWER LEVEL ELECTRICAL RAN E2 MAIN LEVEL ELECTRICAL RAN E3 UPPER LEVEL ELECTRICAL PLAN 51 5TRUCTURALNOTEE GEN. CONTRACTOR HENDELTIONIC5 CUEN _ Hf RESIDENCE MEETING X X X X X PROGRZ55 X X X X CONTINUOUS RIDGE VENTS -�-t 11/12 -. .. 12 \ _ 20 - -mot _ -' -, _,_ ,• -. ES I• 12 . l 48'TALLTIPABER BRACKETS -- ., I -_.- . -. . - -; .•= _ .'.: - ' _ -.: .. - j EDETAIL 4fA17 ARCHRECTURAL SHINGL �\ fY - .,,..- . - - - -._ _. :. - �...: : : it • : - - - d Gr —_ , '..:20 - DIAPAOND- E E -- .:\ ti.4 // QN GABLE ENDS 1z4TRUA OVER 2 - {,. ':X ' ) R6/4'•5!1 FASCIA T,:.r,•r - -= - 1 r� 1x4 TRIM OVER 514k12 FASCIA cf . PER PLATE - :. -_ 2x10 FRIEZE T � . J. r .:-2xe HEAD � -. �� •.��- _ - ::::� —__._. .. -. .' r. -- -, ._- -. ___ _ .a•.... - -: -::� J i tI -.:I -, - -f-1L �� .'r. - 4J, Ir �:'_._ .5 /4x6 SIDES, I -- � � ,x- _'. - - - III III J;. a . _1• 9tjt 1! T.f:: F jj, I FLARED OVERHANGS I. -- -� - -•• ' -- -.z_:, '.i .,...,...,, I ' . -. ,.: ..: _. -. , . t .l i . I I sz i ;; . . ; I � .. ,,( I G - - ' I'? i _ .. . --` - -- ,.,. . __ a. ': ... _ -.. _. ... -., : -, !zI ,II. 111 !I1r ,I I, •I �Oli, +- _._ r , PERLEVEL I� r- I. L.I .. I ll.l lr. 111. .1 ! .4'. -3 � 1-1..' C�U� 1 4/12 � � �I 1 !I l II'If I7:P L. ,p,- 17. I ,I f� - - �L 111- I( L I.I_ ) I 1 li'; I'ri _ - :___..___._.- _.. _. _ __ _•_ -- _ J.. I:I I PLY BEAD BO !IILiI "1 -'r. 1!� rLU- )z -L!�'' �I I SOFFITS i I i i 111 'I! 'h ,. ERROOFING Il ii, Ill! ', n..� : . IU.LI!. P�li -I II I i �'I I � � � - � � j I 1 COPP I II'I �:! . _ L� L!: II! i.! -1 LL .rlf�ll _'' .l, 'I JI.II AINP __ _. I 1: - II!f_:111.•,.1. .I 1. %_, � - - - - - ---_ __ -�- t"yf}i�_nII .. - PLATE - _., .! L.II:! ill/ 9 1 1 !t. I � __ �I II L.I.!�! t 1l I I ' I ;i 1. �l l_ FLARE WALLS TO COVER I _ I I ,. R.v _;_._.._:- ._,:::� r.: .,.:_ _,.- ....P__... ;: I:r Il l l:,�i - .. .;...- � , ., ,z e. - - - __ - , 1. I ! 1 ..1: , P_i,�(' T.O. STONEVENEER -•+71JL 7• .alatt; r'� a -, .,;,_ I :.,. _t 1 I•, 1 - - 1 _.. . _ Cl.v -Ll ,. , ,. ,;' - P 13� 1h r -irt< _' - - — OWOWHFAD til-- -...,- .. -i. ... _ ` ` - __ L. l l I :I II I'. I .:. !III ;3•`L4 I : .� z. - . � ..�_.... L I p f ..,..�::.a„ � 7,mu _.I -,, r � - ky-, -_u- I � T:..` I 5. ;r - .I �- . TIERS W/ DOWN TS 1-- I1 ,I n.„.. I -I r I -1rI 1 Irlr.r lh .11 . , L I _ I,r I.II I . I r : I. r ,. ! I :, : I . ,Ir , I .r:.l I 1 � rI 1 .. : . I - r _I � .- .,,_ . ._. t , - ,. _. . : .;. i- -., . : , , - -. . , -. _ .; ..,_'. . -._ . , - ..- r . I' . - �I ) - €I ': .r III I: I .,I _ I:. l_1 I .1Il 1. :• .I ;,r . . 1I, .. . 1 I . r 1 1r ._r ., , . . _ . . ,_ : I 1, .., , : r . I I e i ., .f f : - L. . 1 L '_ ll �, .. ! ,._ ..�, . , - _, - -,: -- > _� <, z:r... . , ,. , _ � 1 . t .-._ I , ., :. � ( :I 1 � , 1 .. , . y�,. -, - „ _ . _ . _ � ::.;- .. .. . -.1.. . :,. ,, I . I .- . .' — .. L - ._ .. _ •r . _ ..,..:,..� .7 : . '. ',, ,: : . ,_ -_ _,: :.r, - .: . �__, ..-_ -.. ... c - . , � }._.... .. rt . ' �:..,- ,_:. _ . ; � .. ., . : �. . > U it NTO PVC PIPE I _ ' I : ' . - - - � ._.: .- : . . _r . , yy 7 at n t} lr L ,,;�'•_ :t + . . � -s:{ 1+1 '= : .:7 z : � i r _ u „ . r_ _ A i t .L _c. F - ' : 7 . 7 - C t.f+ :' ' : c . . r., : , - i + 1 Pi _ _s .: . , �s : J � . r ( _ • :� 7 � - 1J Y- :; - _ - - VERTICAL W OOD PLANK i SHUTTERS - Y. 2ETAINING WALL r • , ; „ r. . ,1 ,. 17 iJ .� . � .:. :. . r r lll :- .. J .,L . _ ,L, \, __ :. _ RN . COLUPANS - I '.' � .. _ ' � ' : < f ' a f�- ' �:. r r. . - - .I i- .,, - ,,, . . 1. �! r.l,r,t.,..r.1rll_,......t!tlTi' I I,,d L..:,'.: I'r r L �t.:T. _..I ......• _ _ - AS PER SURVEY I I II f. I I .. .. ,: I, . 1 .. : , r ��, 2 r _ TRIP•1. 1 • f �- - - - •I I r I1911r :J• 011. i�il :.. :II,�• Ir I .t - ,. ,, :. ,.. _,r t <.- - Ir ILI. L+ =13i � -� - I F — ! : , �`�f •r� -.n,i :-i - - - r .. .; . -r. ! :- :! - - ._ __,� � : , - 7 :5 1 I I I' 4''UIII '; LL'; 1 r[ _ _ j'; r'!! - � I, A %c:'� - j - L N ,1 _ _ y. s �1 �r. -- AIN - _ - - - _ ❑ iiw - - �'�' �1f'- !” L - i ,r: _1:'� 1 I 1 i ,� -A la' c= I -:- I- 'i f' —� THINSTO �(."' r �--�'a -,•�,. � ��{g Ti f I t r, NE VENEER _ _ I r - - RETAININGWALLAS PER SURVEY STONE REPROVED - - - -- • -- lA'OOD S7rA10ES WHIGH DECORATIVE' RAIL TAPEREDSTONEBASESREMOVED - 48"TALL TIMBER BRACKETS 48* TALL TIMBER BRACKETS ra _ (SEEDETAIL4/A20) (SEE DETAIL 4 1A77) :O q - -- _ ARCHITECTURAL SHINGLES - DWAOND- PATTERNED BRAKES r � "�P L-�1- tCh - (N GABLE ENDS) \t 1z4 TRI79OVER514'k12FASC9A 12 8 •�,, � � � - -- -- __� � - � �4£ �_ \.. .1x4 TRU,I OVER 514'x12 FASCIA yY -Z k - -n ROOF RO0F8. - - UPPER PLATE - - _ 1 11` j — ,S: - - at L I L _ 1 I �III 2 Z L 1 x10 FRIE E — I! s, 'ae 77 r i - .!. PLY -BEAD SOFFITS • r I I ri. 2x70 FRIEZE UPPER LEVEL !' 1 J; ! ! i I . I. .; r - -:' - __.__— - u' ' IJI -a r .t 7' P,WNPLATE �;i -! }'� �,� h ,' -`, . t. ^< -..,V_ �_ .,� � <-,--� �.,�- -_ _ .I. - __ GUTTERS W /DONM' - rL ',: :.i � _ __ - i11 TODRAIN. =��T' L;a•L ;t- y - _ - ��314 "TRI79 - _ g B�WDWH All I: 1 INTO C Jo• PV PIPE S. •'i - S. - _ r - r -max .: .. y ..•,.. .:, � ,r� .r ' -, a i- �6 . . .,�., .EI. :: •�+*xsg -. . - _,..., ,r 4W. DOO BRAR C KH E TS l ,_•, t- _ „ {{ r :I:' F l . - ,- _• ,.,., 1, .;._ J - �� : ` 1' ' � , T?I I•� - 1 i r ::• SPOUTS S WI DOWi . GUTTER ( SEE DETAIL 3A ) TO DRAIN .k r, INTO PVC PIPE j TYP. VJWTRIA. �1MIA { f: 2xTAPEREDCAP OVER on a a ` t4Jtt�� T 2x8 HEAD 6 /4x6 SIDES, f u. 2x APEREDS LL T I OVER 6!4x5 - _ A411N LEVEL - _ D- 7.,�(,. :1- ,,� 1 , �• I • r , :I. �.. '1.:1.I. ,,,, ,I i. - r�. ;. .. �. � "' LJII':_II_IJ.I; r:7t. u� . --- .;`.t. r.l. -1UJ� I, -I t a :tt !; i I--. tt s- : ... ,. ,.;' -�:. 1s - ', .,- >.- ' BILL , : r.3 - W1RDS R7-f _ PTI BSP. E :I :..I : } - 7•: 1 _7. �� r 4/12 �, M 9T PLAT I _ .. ; I. y1�..... t - 4 ,y — �' .; r, I�'C}i,r, i -,1 �I _ i tlli{I x8 WOOD_BRACKETS' 1 F A ), � ��Q�y� i!.:1 MAX. 4; r -,a.. 0PEONGS Exhibit D i / 1 5 I L f l— vc 3n1 ORaP, V f RETAINING WALL � BUILDING ELEVATIONS EAST AND _ - _ 111�6L SASREO'D WEST 3SGIT LEVEL 1 .I! t L-i47 i LI + - -- __ I L:, k:: (4' -0 °P•9AX. DROP PER VIALL) hFzTffi}-.)LNC -Z •W lj-r -LS SEA B- IA iJl� I A d - 2 -TIER PORCH ROOF & PERGOLA REMOVED COPPER LEFT (SOUTH) ELEVATION 1/4 1W 1 7 t �L fij UPPER PLATE UPPERLEVEL M1WN PLATE 8-0 WDW HEAD GUTTERS VT/DOWN SPOUTS TO DRAIN INTO PVC PIPE RETAINING WALL AS PER SURVEY Exhibit E BUILDING ELEVATION - SOUTH sa AW Ir Nl- ul 06 QI IIW7� - r !JdPt,SS-fHH/9S6TA/AjunoD ui auu@H npa•uwn•q!l'oa llq E� C7 � W � CITY OF SHOREWOOD RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR ADDITIONAL ACCESSORY SPACE TO BRADLEY HAUSER WHEREAS, Bradley Hauser (Applicant) is the owner of real property located at 5640 Covington Road, in the City of Shorewood, County of Hennepin, legally described in Exhibit A, attached hereto and made a part hereof, and WHEREAS, the Applicant has applied to the City for a Conditional Use Permit for the construction of an attached garage, the area of which, when added to the area of existing accessory space on the property, will bring the total area of accessory space on the property up to 1359 square feet; and WHEREAS, the Shorewood City Code requires a Conditional use Permit for the construction of accessory space exceeding 1200 square feet; and WHEREAS, the Applicant's request was reviewed by the City Planner, and his recommendations were duly set forth in a memorandum to the Planning Commission dated 10 March 2016, which memorandum is on file at City Hall; and WHEREAS, after required notice, a public hearing was held and the application was reviewed by the Planning Commission at its regular meeting on 15 March 2016, the minutes of which meeting are on file at City Hall; and WHEREAS, the Applicant's request was considered by the City Council at its regular meeting on 28 March 2016, at which time the Planner's memorandum and the minutes of the Planning Commission were reviewed and comments were heard by the Council from the City staff. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Shorewood as follows: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The subject property is located in a R-lA/S, Single- Family Residential/Shoreland zoning district and contains approximately 82,795 square feet of area. 2. The total proposed accessory space (1359 square feet) does not exceed the floor area above grade of the principal structure(3422 square feet on the main level alone). 3. The total area of accessory space does not exceed 10% of the minimum lot area for the R-lA/S zoning district in which it is located (4000 square feet). 4. That the design and materials of the proposed attached garage are consistent with the architectural character of the proposed home. 5. The subject garage complies with all setback requirements for the R-lA/S. zoning- district. 6. The old pumphouse located on the west end of the property does not comply with current setback requirements for the R-lA/S zoning district. 7. The Planning Commission has recommended that the nonconforming pumphouse has architectural, cultural or historical value, specifically: a. The applicant has demonstrated that the pumphouse existed in advance of the incorporation of the City of Shorewood. b. The design of the building is unusual because it is built almost entirely into the hillside on the west side of the property. The structure has historically been used to house equipment for irrigating the subject property and likely to provide water for the home on the property as well as nearby homes. CONCLUSION A. The application of Bradley Hauser for a Conditional Use Permit as set forth herein above be and hereby is granted. B. This approval is subject to the following: 1. The attached garage and existing pumphouse will be used strictly for purposes of a residential nature. 2. The Applicant is hereby advised that the City Code provides specific regulations relative to home occupations and any future use of the garage or pumphouse for other than allowable residential purposes would have to comply with such regulations. 3. The Applicant shall maintain the existing pumphouse in good condition. The exterior of the structure shall be painted in an earth tone color. C. That the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to provide the Applicant with a certified copy of this Resolution for filing with the Hennepin County Recorder or Registrar of Titles. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY SHOREWOOD this 28th day of March 2016. ATTEST: Scott Zerby, Mayor Jean Panchyshyn, City Clerk -2- Legal Description: That part of Government Lot 4, Section 36, Township 117, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota described as follows: Commencing at a point on the north and south centerline of said Section 36 a distance of 793 feet North from the south line of said Government Lot 4 as measured along said centerline; thence on an assumed bearing o£ West parallel with the south line of said Government Lot 4 a distance of 265.25 feet to the point of beginning of the land being described; thence Northerly 9 feet parallel with the north and south centerline of said Section 36; thence Easterly to the centerline of Covington Road along a line which if extended would intersect said north and south centerline of said Seciton 36 a distance of 805 feet North from the south line of said Government Lot 4; thence Northwesterly along the centerline of said Covington Road to a point 988.9 feet North from the south line of said Government Lot 4 as measured at right angles with said south line; thence North 83 degrees 34 minutes 30 seconds West 160 feet; thence South 87 degrees -55 minutes 30 seconds West to the shore of Christmas Lake; thence Southerly along the shore of said Lake to a line bearing West from the point of beginning; thence East to the point of beginning. Except Road. Exhibit A � #sc MEETING TYPE City of Shorewood Council Meeting Item Regular Meeting .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Title/Subject: Shorewood Senior Living(Oppidan)—Concept and Development Stage Plans Meeting Date: 28 March 2016 Prepared by: Brad Nielsen Reviewed by: Patti Helgesen Attachments: Planning Director's Memorandum Draft Resolution, Marr Correspondence Policy Consideration: Should the City approve concept and development stage plans for the Shorewood Senior Living (Oppidan) P.U.D.? Background: Oppidan has submitted concept and development stage plans for a 105-unit senior housing project to be called Shorewood Senior Living P.U.D. For detailed background on this item, please refer to the Planning Director's memorandum, dated 7 March 2016, attached. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter at its 15 March meeting and voted unanimously to recommend approval of the plans, subject to conditions, one of the most significant of which is to continue working with staff to improve the landscape plan for the project. Financial or Budget Considerations: The applicant has provided the fees for a request for Tax Increment Financing. In addition, Oppidan will be required to escrow money for the feasibility study for a water main extension to serve the project. Park dedication and local sanitary sewer access charges will be addressed as part of the final plan stage of the P.U.D. Options: Adopt the attached draft resolution approving Concept and Development Stage Plans; deny the request; or modify the conditions recommended by staff and the Planning Commission. Recommendation/Action Requested: Staff recommends approval of the draft resolution. Next Steps and Timelines: The developer hopes to submit final plans in early April in order to have them considered in late April or early May. Their intention is to secure a building permit and begin construction as early as June. Mission Statement: The City of Shorewood is committed to providing residents quality public services, a healthy environment, a variety of attractive amenities, a sustainable tax base, and sound financial management through effective, efficient, and visionary leadership. Page 1 MEMORANDUM TO: Planning Commission, Mayor and City Council FROM: Brad Nielsen DATE: 7 March 2016 RE: Oppidan — Shorewood Senior Living P.U.D. - Concept and Development Stage Plans — Proposed Zoning Text Amendments FILE NO. 405(16.01) BACKGROUND Oppidan Investment Company has arranged to purchase the three parcels of land located at 6020 and 6050 Chaska Road, and 23075 State Highway 7 (see Site Location map — Attachment I). As explained in their narrative (Attachment II), they propose to redevelop the three sites and build a senior housing project consisting of independent living, assisted living and memory care. The proposed mix of these units is 28 independent, 52 assisted, and 25 memory. Plans for the project are included herein as Attachment lII. The three parcels of land contain approximately 3.77 acres. The Highway 7 parcel is occupied by the Control House office building and is zoned R -C, Residential Commercial. The two southerly parcels on Chaska Road are occupied by single- family homes, zoned R -2A, Single and Two - Family Residential. Land use and zoning surrounding the site are as follows: Nortb/Northwest: State Highway 7 South/Southwest: Single- family and two - family residential; zoned R -2A East: Single- family residential; zoned R -1C; Single - Family Residential The property varies considerably with respect to topography, dropping approximately 25 feet from the southeast corner of the site to the northerly end near the ditch for Highway 7. The site has been significantly altered over the years and is characterized by rather low quality vegetation as shown on Sheet L24 (Attachment III). As can be seen on that exhibit, many of the trees on the property are cottonwood or box elder, which are not considered to be significant trees as defined in Shorewood's Tree Preservation and Reforestation Policy. ®2, V ® ,J® PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER Memorandum Re: Oppidan — Shorewood Senior Living 7 March 2016' . To accomplish their project, Oppidan has requested a rezoning of the three parcels to P.U.D., Planned Unit Development District, for which they have submitted Concept and Development Stage Plans. They have also requested additional zoning text amendments related to allowable . density and parking requirements for senior housing. These will be addressed further on in this report. The project is explained in the applicant's narrative (Attachment II) and illustrated in the plans contained in Attachment III. ISSUES AND ANALYSIS A. Land Use /Density. Oppidan's application includes rezoning from R -2A and R -C to P.U.D., Planned Unit Development District (essentially using R -C standards). Senior housing is an allowable use (conditional) in the R -C District and a P.U.D. process is required. In December of last year, the applicant applied for and received a zoning text amendment changing the density allowance in the R -C District from 10 to 12 units per 40,000 square feet. They are now asking for the density to be increased to 15 units per 40,000 square feet. Although not stated in their narrative, the applicant has indicated that the reason for the increase in density and the number of units is to overcome the cost of extensive soil correction that is necessary to redevelop the site, as well as extraordinary costs in extending water to the south side of Highway 7. In addition to the increased density, the applicant will be seeking approval for tax increment financing (T.I.F.) to further offset development costs. It is worth noting that the City has considered allowing density up to 15 units per 40,000 square feet in the Smithtown Crossing Redevelopment Area. This was initially proposed to create some incentive for senior housing in that location. In addition to the increased number, the Code was revised to only count assisted living units as half units. It should'also be noted that the application calculates the density based on units per acre; whereas Shorewood's Code is based on units per 40,000 square feet. The result is that the project comes in at 13.1 units per 40,000 square feet. If, for example, the project was reduced by five units, the text amendment would not be necessary. It is, important to keep in mind that, if adopted, the amendment would apply to other R -C zoned properties. B. Site Plan. The proposed site plan is shown on Sheet C2 -1 (Att. III). Although the site plan is extremely tight, the plan complies with setback requirements for the building and parking, with one exception. The patio area on the northwesterly side of the building extends into the rear yard setback abutting Highway 7. As part of a P.U.D., this can be acceptable. In fact, as will be discussed under Landscaping, below, it would be worthwhile to consider moving the entire building farther back on the site to accommodate additional landscaping. The maximum amount of impervious surface in the R -C district is 66 percent of the total site area. With special drainage improvements that treat runoff, that amount can go to 75 percent. The site plan indicates a total of 52 percent impervious surface. The applicant should be required to provide a detailed breakdown of hardcover, including the area designated as proof of parking. -2- Memorandum Re: Oppidan — Shorewood Senior Living 7 March 2016 C. Parking /Circulation. Although the applicant's narrative indicates that there are four access points for the project, only three appear on the site plan. Two of the driveways serve the above- ground parking area and the northerly one serves as access to the underground parking garage. There has been some confusion as to the amount of parking required for the project, resulting in the applicant requesting a zoning text amendment that would match the amount of parking required to the number of spaces being provided on the site plan. Upon detailed review of the Zoning Code and the proposed plans, an amendment does not appear to be necessary. The required number of spaces, based on the recently amended ordinance, is 120 (including proof of parking). The site plan shows 122 spaces. The City, Engineer's report (Attachment IV) mentions a recommendation from the Fire Inspector that the Fire Department would not require a 20 -foot wide fire access around the property, but they will require a paved access around the building — the access to be maintained year round. D. Landscaping_ The applicant's narrative states that very little tree preservation is possible due to several factors: 1) accommodating the building and parking areas; 2) maintaining and improving existing drainage conditions; and, most notably 3) correcting significant soil issues on the site. Based on Oppidan's soil testing, a substantial portion. of the site has been filled over time with poor quality material (e.g. rock, concrete, etc.). As can be seen on Sheet L2 -1 (Att. III), a large number of the existing trees on the site are box elder and cottonwood. The plan indicates that trees off the site will remain. The preservation plan should indicate where tree protection fencing will be placed in order to preserve those trees. Also, some consideration should be given to trying to save the two large oak, trees at the north end of the site, unless they are determined to be in poor condition. This may necessitate some revision to the grading plan. The landscape plan for the project is shown on Sheet L1 -1 (Att. III). First, the plan should be signed by the landscape architect who prepared it. Secondly, the plan is considered extremely sparse, particularly for the size of the building. The applicant indicates that significant landscaping in front of the building is not possible due to the location of power lines along Chaska Road. It is further compounded by the ditch proposed on the northwesterly side of the street. While staff agrees that we do not want to end up with trees displaying the "Xcel Haircut ", much more needs to be done to screen the, parking areas from single- family homes across the street and to ,soften the effects of the three -story building. As mentioned earlier in this report, serious consideration should be given to shifting the building toward Highway 7, at least five feet or even more. This would start to make room for additional landscaping and possibly a small landscaped berm along the edge of the parking in front of the property. One small detail - the size of replacement trees is 3 -inch caliper instead of the 2.5 -inch shown on the landscape plan: , E. Grading, Drainage, Erosion Control and Utilities. These items are addressed in the City Engineer's report (Attachment IV). Perhaps the most significant issue with respect to utilities is the extraordinary expense in getting city water to the subject property. A line must be extended from Minnetonka Drive at Yellowstone Trail over to the highway, where it must be jacked -3- Memorandum Re: Oppidan — Shorewood Senior,Living 7 March 2016 under the highway. As mentioned previously, the applicant will be seeking T.I.F. to offset the cost of water main extension: The City Engineer has enumerated several items he still needs from the applicant, particularly relative to drainage. F. Building Plans. Floor plans and elevations for the proposed building are shown on Sheets A -1 through A -4 and A3.1 through A3.4. The proposed building complies with the height limitations for the R -C District — three stories /3 5 feet. The exception is the northerly elevation where the underground garage daylights. The P.U.D. approach to the project provides flexibility to accommodate the small area of the building that is taller than 35 feet. RECOMMENDATION The applicant has put substantial time and effort, into the plans thus far. Nevertheless, there are enough outstanding issues remaining that staff is reluctant to recommend approval at this time. It is recommended that the applicant be directed to resolve the issues raised herein and in the City Engineer's letter and return to the Planning Commission's 19 April meeting. Cc: Bill Joynes Paul Hornby Tim Keane Larry Brown Bruce DeJong Shannon Rusk H a) a� a� nr z< o 0 LO 0 N Murra 0 i ►e J ve 10 IA1je m r` 3. O LU a T� c� U) Q s z aoa a► Q U a) Al n p A = o u as a) a) = u pu.-I VII 0 0 Attachment I Oppidan Investment Company is applying for two requests for a redevelopment of 3 sites located in Shorewood, Hennepin County, Minnesota. The addresses are 6020 and 6050 Chaska Road and 23075 State Highway 7 just south of Highway 7 and west of Chaska Road. The parcels collectively represent approximately 3.7 acres. The PIDs are 34- 117 -23 -43 -0034, 34- 117 -23 -43 -0002 and 34- 117 -23 -43 -0033. The intent of the redevelopment is to build a Senior Assisted Living facility which will comprise 105 units on three levels for seniors living in and around the Shorewood community. The project will have Independent Living, Assisted Living and Memory Care units to facilitate the aging in place concept by our operator, Ebenezer. Ebenezer is wholly owned by Fairview Hospital and brings a wealth of experience and awareness to the aging population both from a caring living experience to necessary healthcare. The request is : Text amendment to City Code Section 1201.03 Subd. 20.b.(8)(c) to allow for "Fifteen units per acre ". Text amendment to City Code Section 1201.03 Subd.5.h(8) to allow for: Memory Care -1 per 3 beds + 4 spaces (The 4 can be waived if other parking is available) Assisted Living -1 %2 per 2 units + 1/2 space proof per 2 units Independent Living- 1 % spaces per unit + 1/2 space proof per unit Attachment II Required Proof of Total Stalls Parking (Minimum) Memory Care (25) 9 0 9 Assisted Living (52) 39 13 52 Independent Living 42 14 56 (30) Total 90 27 117 Total stalls " Total stalls + required Proof of Parking Required Shown on Plan 105 17 122 Total stalls Total stalls+ on plan Proof shown on plan Exceeds Exceeds minimum required minimum required Attachment II General Concept Stage (1) General Information Landowners Names: D C Stock and M R Stock GR Clapp and SD Clapp Control House Invest, LLC *does not include road easements Applicants Names: KTJ 285 LLC Consultants: 6020 Chaska Road 6050 Chaska Road 23075 State Hwy 7 Oppidan Investment Company, Developer Loucks, Civil Engineering Pope Architects, Architect Land Control: 34- 117 -23 -43 -0034 .79 acres* 34- 117 -23 -43 -0002 1.9 acres* 34- 117 -23 -43 -0033 1.08 acres* Oppidan Investment Company (KTJ 285, LLC) has all three properties under Purchase Agreement (attached) and title evidence is also (attached) (2) Present Status Address and Legal (attached above in title information) Existing Zoning: 6020 Chaska Road and 6050 Chaska Road current zoning R2A 23075 State Hwy 7 current zoning RC All other land within 1,000 feet is zoned R2A (3) Written Statement: The approximate 4.24 acres (3.77 acres excluding road easements) described in the application herein are proposed to be rezoned to a PUD with an underlying compliance to RC zoning in the City of Shorewood. The development is proposed to be a Senior Assisted Living facility which will be comprised of 105 living units on three levels for seniors living in and around the Shorewood community. Oppidan Investment Company contracted a Senior Living Consultant to perform a market study to determine the demand for Senior residential units for Independent, Assisted and Memory Care living. The study (attached) supports our proposed project. This project will be owned by Oppidan Investment Company and operated by Ebenezer and is designed to facilitate the aging in place concept for seniors. Ebenezer is wholly owned by Fairview Hospital and brings a wealth of experience and awareness to the aging population both from a caring living experience to necessary healthcare. Ebenezer operates quality independent living, assisted living and memory care communities located in the Twin Cities metropolitan area. Blending healthcare, customer service and residential property development assistance, Ebenezer has developed a solid reputation for quality senior living communities. Their projects provide high - quality care in a safe, home -like setting. Amenities include game rooms, chapels, beauty salons, fitness centers, movie theaters and libraries The PUD will allow for a thoughtful development for Senior's in the Shorewood and surrounding community. The staged, aging in place concept allows Senior's to relocate into the development at various stages of life. It will be a vital community with many amenities inclusive of fitness center, theatre, beauty salon, bistro, community gathering rooms and outdoor spaces. A Senior could enter at the peak of their senior years to eliminate the hassle of home ownership or one could enter at a time when acute healthcare is needed to monitor and manage physical and /or mental decline. The project has been designed by Pope Architects a renowned architect very familiar with Senior Housing Projects around the area. They incorporate state of the art design criteria to facilitate the needs of seniors as well as to allow for a pleasant experience for visiting family members. Site Plan The site has been designed to separate the vehicular traffic with four access points. The north access is for the underground garage for residents to park away from the elements. The middle two accesses provide for circulation to the front drop off area and through the visitor parking area. The south access is a loading access for deliveries to the kitchen. The community room and dining room have patios for outdoor seating as well as the front porch. This provides for a pleasant indoor /outdoor experience. There is also a memory garden tucked into the west side of the building. The site slopes from the southwest corner of the site to the northeast corner with a drop of 20 feet. In the southwest corner of the site the adjacent residential property is 10 feet above the building finished floor. The stormwater management design incorporates underground perforated pipes as well as an above ground pond in the low part of the site. The density allowed per the proposed text amendment is 15 / acre or 3.77 x 15 = 56.6. Our project has a density calculation as follows: 28 IL x 1 unit= 28 52AL x.5 unit= 26 25 MC x 0 unit= 0 Total Density calculation of our proposed project is 54 (below the allowed calculation above) The Parking required per city (inclusive of proof of parking) is calculated as follows: Memory Care - 1 per 3 beds + 4 spaces (The 4 can be waived if other parking is available) Assisted Living -1 % per 2 units + 1/2 space proof pert units Independent Living - 1 %2 spaces per unit + 1/2 space proof per unit Landscaping We have prepared a Tree Preservation Plan as required by code. Since there is so much grade change we are disturbing the entire site. The Tree Preservation ordinance requires that we replace 8 trees per acre for a total of 34 trees. We are providing 34 trees. It is important to note that along the south property line, there is an overhead electric line. This line prohibits us from installing trees in this area. Therefore we have provided shrubs along this entire length. Required Proof of Total Stalls Parking (Minimum) Memory Care (25) 9 0 9 Assisted Living (52) 39 13 52 Independent Living 42 14 56 (28) Tota 1 90 27 117 Total stalls Total stalls + required Proof of Parking Required Shown on Plan 105 17 122 Total stalls Total stalls + on plan Proof shown on plan Exceeds Exceeds minimum required minimum required Landscaping We have prepared a Tree Preservation Plan as required by code. Since there is so much grade change we are disturbing the entire site. The Tree Preservation ordinance requires that we replace 8 trees per acre for a total of 34 trees. We are providing 34 trees. It is important to note that along the south property line, there is an overhead electric line. This line prohibits us from installing trees in this area. Therefore we have provided shrubs along this entire length. Lighting Plan The Lighting Plan provides a mixture of shoebox type lights with full cutoff. The lights along the service drive are 20 feet tall and are placed along the interior of the access drive. This results in a low level of lighting 0.4 foot candles or less at the property line. The main parking lot provides an average of 2.2 foot candles. Oppidan has requested a Text Amendment to City Code Section 1201.03 Subd. 20.b.(8)(c) to allow for "Fifteen Units per acre ". Text Amendment to City Code Section 1201.03 Subd.5.h(8) to allow for parking per the table above. The PUD will be constructed in one Phase and will take approximately 14 months from groundbreaking to resident move in. We are currently planning on commencing construction June 2016 with residents moving in the fall of 2017. (4) Site Conditions (see attached from Loucks) (5) Schematic Drawing (see attached from Pope) (6) Estimated total number of dwelling units proposed for PUD A total of 105 senior housing units will be developed on this site. 52 of the units will be for Assisted Living and 28 units will be for Independent Living. 25 units will be devoted to Memory Care. (Please see Table enclosed outlining development component calculations) (7) Development/ Construction schedule (see attached) (8) N/A (9) N/A (10) N/A (11) N/A MIAR 04 ?016 CITY OF SHOREWOOD 'Q__ 61 L,24 SHEET INDEX CO -1 COVER SHEET 1 -1 ALTA/ACSM LAND TITLE SURVEY C1 -2 DEMOLITION PLAN C2 -1 SITE PLAN C3 -1 GRADING PLAN C3 -2 SWPP PLAN C3 -3 SWPP PLAN C34 SWPP PLAN C4 -1 UTILITY PLAN C8 -1 CIVIL DETAILS C8 -2 CIVIL DETAILS L1 -1 LANDSCAPE PLAN L1 -2 LANDSCAPE DETAILS L2 -1 TREE PRESERVATION PLAN P1 -1 PHOTOMETRIC PLAN P1 -2 PHOTOMETRIC CUT - SHEETS A -0 ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN A -1 LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN A -2 FIRST LEVEL FLOOR PLAN A -3 SECOND LEVEL FLOOR PLAN A -4 THIRD LEVEL FLOOR PLAN A3.1 ELEVATIONS A3.2 ELEVATIONS A3.3 PERSPECTIVES A3.4 PERSPECTIVES GENERAL'NOTES 1. This Existing Conditions Plan was prepared by a field survey prepared by Loucks Associates and record utility drawings from the City of Shorewood. 2. We have shown buried structures and utilities on and /or serving the site to the best of our ability, subject to the following restrictions: a. Utility operators do not consistently respond to locate requests through the Gopher State One Call service for boundary purposes such as this. b. Those utility operators that do respond, often will not locate services from their main line to the customer's structure or facility - they consider those segments private installations that are outside their jurisdiction. If • private service to an adjoiner's site crosses this site or • service to this site crosses an adjoiner, it may not be located since most operators will not mark such "private" services. C. Snow and ice conditions during winter months may obscure otherwise visible evidence of a buried structure or utility. d. Maps provided by operators, either along with a field location or in lieu of such a location, are very often inaccurate or inconclusive. e. The surface features and elevations shown on this drawing were located by Loucks Associates. f. All of the underground utility information and location shown on this plan were prepared from record drawings obtained from the client and the City of Shorewood records. g. EXTREME CAUTION MUST BE EXERCISED BEFORE AN EXCAVATION TAKES PLACE ON OR NEAR THIS SITE. BEFORE DIGGING, YOU ARE REQUIRED BY LAW TO NOTIFY GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE AT 651/454 -0002. SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA PRELIMINARY PLANS VICINITY MAP La<ke ----- - - - - -- Po1nt 1 Echo Bay / Goie % aca nv[ Island r 19 Q 1\ // 'LW tfla.n\ 's� r \ -1 GREENWOOD o el sands. TONKA 3o IIAY eraeon B "y semare EXCELSIOR lI /^ Iv PLEe5s4T ntF. 1 POInt� - -✓ r / \ end Isla D W // ,f •I c,,.t,rcr / 5L A �S fb z Bay / Bay I I rAEn to EEPPa. 19l ✓ �OO�OOOO `.�/ � / „�,i: aL, r n0. : R.. Salix CpaNe 6Rat',Ea Pn y 4 / CHalla c' n.SHOREIVOOD e 2010 POP. 7.307 nF +tea.GT` :® tl �,ECEO•s} g l -',::C a �I _ Ern �7L vx°a e x cecPnr is nEris t .a A > ai�9 -• ; € itnden _ (Lf\ -�' W' �3 � "'� ,d�� =��'q � -• �`a3 sTe,iro� s [x. � 771- OMNDDT 41 R.R.R. - Dononcm cerc LOCATION WARNING: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CALLING FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. THEY SHALL COOPERATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES IN MAINTAINING THEIR SERVICE AND / OR RELOCATION OF LINES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651- 454 -0002 AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE FOR THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND WIRES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES, VALVES OR OTHER BURIED STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. CALL BEFORE YOU DIG! Gopher State One Call II%TWIN CITY AREA: 651- 454 -0002 ►► TOLL FREE: 1- 800 - 252 -1166 Developer - Oppidan 400 Water Street Suite 200 Excelsion, MN 55331 Engineer 7200 Hemlock Lane Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 Surveyor 7200 Hemlock Lane Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 Landscape Architect 7200 Hemlock Lane Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 CONTACTS Pat Barrett TEL: 952- 294 -1253 EMAIL: patb @oppidan.com Vicki Van Dell P.E. TEL: 763- 496 -6720 EMAIL: vvandell @loucksinc.com Rick Licht L.S. TEL: 763 - 496 -6756 EMAIL: rlicht @loucksinc.com Tim Fedie L.A. TEL: 763- 496 -6726 EMAIL: tfedie @loucksinc.com Attachment III El mm LOUCKS PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL 7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinccom H��PM1. r°aMw`�r3� �• yH.., 01/05/16 PUD Submittal 03/04/16 Revised PUD Submittal du h by.n4thrtfAh P'a.tsyedP¢ae'aior ,e ,V 1 Pa d ay.,de av d:,eat:w:mso,w wt am a d4 c,ued P,olestlaui Eng'xu uMe. V,e lanz oltiw State onf eata. Vdd J. Vzn D-A -PE License No. 41352 Date Loucks Project No. 15631 Project Lead VJV Drawn By WES Checked By VN Review Date 3/04/16 00 -1 CIVIL LEGEND ct -1 EXISTING C, -2 PROPOSED O SANITARY MANHOLE • OO STORMMANHOLE Q ®� CATCH BASIN 11 -1 t CULVERT LANDSCAPE DETAILS '¢ HYDRANT 1 l D4 GATEVALVE H Div P05T INDICATOR VALVE ®Pry 0 LIGHT POLE >� 0 POWER POLE SIGN a y BENCHMARK SOILBORINGS_ ® WATER MANHOLE OT TELEPHONE MANHOLE 0 UTILITY MANHOLE © ELECTRIC MANHOLE WATER SERVICE —9S SANITARY SERVICE Cam. HANDICAP PARKING 4 lox DIRECTION OF FLOW SPOT ELEVATION CONTOURS /'atf✓ —> SANITARY SEWER —�-- -»— STORMSEWER —N--- - 1 — WATERMAIN —I- R-i FORCEMAIN —FY -- »—DT— DRAINTRE » —oT- SILTFENCE M 0 CURB & GUTTER RETAINING WALL TREELINEm"v - - - - -- EASEMENT LINE - - - - -- - - -— SETBACK LINE — . —. - -- -XX— FENCE LINE —X —X- -TEL— UNDERGROUND TELE eAS- UNDERGROUND GAS 0F1— OVERHEAD UTILITY Developer - Oppidan 400 Water Street Suite 200 Excelsion, MN 55331 Engineer 7200 Hemlock Lane Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 Surveyor 7200 Hemlock Lane Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 Landscape Architect 7200 Hemlock Lane Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 CONTACTS Pat Barrett TEL: 952- 294 -1253 EMAIL: patb @oppidan.com Vicki Van Dell P.E. TEL: 763- 496 -6720 EMAIL: vvandell @loucksinc.com Rick Licht L.S. TEL: 763 - 496 -6756 EMAIL: rlicht @loucksinc.com Tim Fedie L.A. TEL: 763- 496 -6726 EMAIL: tfedie @loucksinc.com Attachment III El mm LOUCKS PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL 7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinccom H��PM1. r°aMw`�r3� �• yH.., 01/05/16 PUD Submittal 03/04/16 Revised PUD Submittal du h by.n4thrtfAh P'a.tsyedP¢ae'aior ,e ,V 1 Pa d ay.,de av d:,eat:w:mso,w wt am a d4 c,ued P,olestlaui Eng'xu uMe. V,e lanz oltiw State onf eata. Vdd J. Vzn D-A -PE License No. 41352 Date Loucks Project No. 15631 Project Lead VJV Drawn By WES Checked By VN Review Date 3/04/16 00 -1 COVER SHEET ct -1 EXISTING CONDITIONS C, -2 DEMOLITION PLAN C2 -1 SITE PLAN C3 -1 GRADING PLAN C3.2 -C3.4 SWPP PLAN C4 -1 UTILITY PLAN C8 -1 - C8-2 CIVIL DETAILS 11 -1 LANDSCAPE PLAN L1 -2 LANDSCAPE DETAILS L2 -1 TREE PRESERVATION PLAN P7 -1 PHOTOMETRIC PLAN Pt -2 PHOTOMETRIC CUT- SHEETS 'i / t jr I , 01 p6 A/ / d-7% 58 44 %36. 'S2'E { I „ a . , , , A / / / / � 5�7� / �" o-.•�� A —fie lb i3 / y� / \`fed �d � i / / / / /// / , /1%''� I II z / •�^ \ <-l_�z \ / , —qw rome of me sw y4 of me orS Ja, r. In, R S1 me rl e _ II /4of S J4, F. 117, R 13 Aid SrD6ladIJSe Sire o/Lot l4$ / / /// /// ,f /^ \ \ y✓•oh' -.� / \ 14.94 — — — \ / %` — L= 1867 -�P� / - \ � 17696 s, _ - - --o' _.-- 95s--- y'�• �. �w9 c°�o /t•.l —`iy °PARCEL 2 -- J_______/ 54 Prov�ry) >,'� :re•�z,_�� �I "/ e� zk\� / °ti D0 E Po d ®°'" / /// r J/ // y/ A VA,� /,•' / \ \;,,' / \ \ `� ( s / ; l((, HOUSE I , • 1 T \ ( \ 5� 9 / y`' / '• •y yh / / / // ° \.\ `4 yS6B \ \ I v: /.\ � i \ 4" \ / (u�� 6A / / / /.� }��jj / / / /� /0 /i_ \\,— "EVvg \ °•rszF� \ 1. v , l �°'- h 1 % =1 / � \ y °,gip_ —�'/ Ism v v � as / Ro BOXELDER 1' / A/ / / /// x '.`!�J/ 1� \ \ � l / �� l l: � �•) CE CEDAR GO COTTONWOOD t\7/ FR MISC FRUIT 7 h/// �I r ' - , l MAPLE CA \ , Houma CA OAK PI PINE \\\\ \ \ \ \ / / z,p• / J / � r/ / / / / � _ / z .,.z i I / PO POPLAR \ \ \\ \\ \ \\ �\\ \ ✓ / / / / / / /g57i / / /$Y. j/ / / // /�/ / i / z'Fi >" °' ' /ry„ I ^� / l% I� �I JJ l SP SPRUCE /99' // / / / / /y 9v'/ ' _ / /� /�' � y / e`` TR TREE (GEN) X';g. \ \ \ • \ \ \ \ / �r,PARG� j ' - / - /{ // THSO ELEV ®THRESHOLD o CAS METER \\ \\ ROOF ORaN 4t �`/ a MAILBOX / / � \ \\ \\ \ \�\ \ / / / /�� / i /// / /, ° / ' caurr. I i I / l ���J //l i� p3 /➢ oP` / $ solL Boau(c \ / CAST IRON MONUMENT 4A° 1 /8'�° /!� :• / ax € / X' �\ \ \• \ \ \\ \ / / / r - -___ �,'�9, � / � � / �. o / / • FOUND IdONUMEt1T X14 • >• VA VAA VA V / /'- / 1� / / / I,ee' I" -.I- / / /'° ,� n�` 0 SEE A- IRON Mo1J 988" SET. MARKED 'LS 74968' I N 0 30 60 SCALE IN FEET SURVEY LEGEND ® M CATCH BASIN ! —S— _ QO STORM MANHOLE —SANITARY SEWER O SANITARY 0.ANHOLE 1 WATERMAIN 0 WELL (CULVERT IN GATE VALVE —UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC �7.— N89?2'7LSW 345.93- 11—UNDERGROUND GAS ~ \� h 'j '^ o —UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE 3W I/4 0 M SE l/4 of S J4, r. 117, R. 11 &S �e of Lnl 175, N 1 of Lot 176, Avd _ Ne IJS ,14� — l � �'` \ •'='1 / I l I.`b''� l zv�''/ / / xy1` /97Y .� ^ / l 0RIGHT OF ACCESS (SCa cuneV Report It- 6) -' —x—x —CHAIN LINK FENCE M A/C UNrr CONCRETE CURB TO TELEPHONE PEDESTAL OCONCRETE 0 ELECTRIC MANHOLE OGRAVEL © GAS VALVE \ g12� CONTOUR O TELEPHONE MANHOLE N 0 30 60 SCALE IN FEET SURVEY LEGEND ® M CATCH BASIN STORM SEWER QO STORM MANHOLE —SANITARY SEWER O SANITARY 0.ANHOLE 1 WATERMAIN 0 WELL (CULVERT IN GATE VALVE —UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC 0 POWER POLE 11—UNDERGROUND GAS [! LIGHT POLE —UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE F GUY WIRE aN— OVERHEAD UTILITY -a- SIGN 0RIGHT OF ACCESS .errs SPOT ELEVATION —x—x —CHAIN LINK FENCE M A/C UNrr CONCRETE CURB TO TELEPHONE PEDESTAL OCONCRETE 0 ELECTRIC MANHOLE OGRAVEL © GAS VALVE \ g12� CONTOUR O TELEPHONE MANHOLE 0 ELECTRIC METER CONIFEROUS TREE e MAILBOX DECIDUOUS TREE Note: See sheet 1 of 2 sheets for the Property Description, ALTA/ACSM land Title Notes, Sarvey Report, and Certification. LOUCKS PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL 7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 ,nn•�.loucksinccam 01/12115 DRAWING ISSUED I �..er �,ose wt nr,•� ,.aon .�, . a,y ' s uy 0,,, m ttASmea A License No.a" 48988 Date 01/12/15 Loucks Project No. 15 -631 Project Lead HN Drawn By MS Checked By FIN Held Crew DP i REMOVE/CAP WELL PER MN DEPT. OF HEALTH L f cf" STANDARDS HOUX r f REMOVE IX./ BUILD114G REMOVE DRIVEWAY / REMOVE IX. ^4 /4 / CULVEdr REMOVE FENCE / SEEETAILS NTRE REMOVAL J / ' p FOR DETAILS ON TREE REMOVAL �S _ Q1 IX. OVERHEAD POWER IN ROW TO REMAIN Y COORDINATE REMOVAL OF GAS SERVICE WITH PROVIDER Ai V I• - � QISINC *e, .. / 6 °cvr ui ` REMOVE EX. � ` BUILDINGS r; % `/�.� %r,'v,i•,tivr_s <:= •�+Tsyn'•_i >•.�• x;r,. •tr. = ��:,:e? �s1 \`.` , t � C -:au� V r- <3,t'� Y.._^ `tiv �ii,;.i�Y �Y'~?t*'� kE-'*�t�i r•2+:•`;7C' �) /y � ., :i;: S ^cam; �5. .,.``•� }�dc- A,,t,. f r ! �`< r ALL DEBRIS TO BE REMOVED IOR TO GRADING ACTIVITY Damo hVSE �+ REMOVE/CAP WELL PER MN DEPT. OF HEALTH DEMOLITION NOTES 1. BACKGROUND INFORMATION IS BASED ON A FIELD SURVEY BY LOUCKS ASSOCIATES AND RECORD UTILITY DRAWINGS FROM THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD. LOUCKS ASSOCIATES DOES NOT GUARANTEE THE ACCURACY OF INFORMATION PROVIDED BY OTHERS. 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE ALL PRECAUTIONS NECESSARY TO AVOID PROPERTY DAMAGE TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PHASE OF THIS PROJECT. THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE HELD RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DAMAGES TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES OCCURRING DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PHASE OF THIS PROJECT. 3. THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING AND MAINTAINING TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SUCH AS BARRICADES, WARNING SIGNS, DIRECTIONAL SIGNS, FLAGMEN AND LIGHTS TO CONTROL THE MOVEMENT OF TRAFFIC WHERE NECESSARY. PLACHIENTOF THESE DEVICES SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER PRIORTO PLACEMENT. TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SHALL CONFORM TO THE APPROPRIATE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT 1 OF TRANSPORTATION STANDARDS. ✓ 4. IN ACCORDANCE WITH GENERALLY ACCEPTED CONSTRUCTION PRACTICES, THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE SOLELY AND COMPLETELY ;J RESPONSIBLE FOR CONDITIONS ON THE JOB SITE, INCLUDING SAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY DURING THE " PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK. THIS REQUIREMENT WILL APPLY {3111(J? Itl 1.11 CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS. 5. THE DUTY OF THE ENGINEER OR THE DEVELOPER TO CONDUCT LOUC V�` CONSTRUCTION REVIEW OF THE CONTRACTORS PERFORMANCE IS ® KS NOT INTENDED TO INCLUDE REVIEW OF THE ADEQUACY OF THE CONTRACTORS SAFETY MEASURES IN, OR NEAR THE PLANNING CONSTRUCTION SITE. CIVIL ENGINEERING 6. BEFORE BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION THE CONTRACTOR SHALL LAND SURVEYING INSTALL A TEMPORARY ROCK ENTRANCE PAD AT ALL POINTS OF LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE VEHICLE EXIT FROM THE PROJECT SITE. SAID ROCK ENTRANCE PAD ENVIRONMENTAL SHALL BE MAINTAINED BY THE CONTRACTOR FOR THE DURATION 7200 Hemlock Lane Su 300 OF THE PROJECT. SEE SHEET C3 -2 FOR DETAILS. to Maple Grove, MN 55369 7. EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE 763.424.5505 ESTABLISHED AROUND THE SITE PERIMETER AS SHOWN AND IN �nnv.lo..ks'nc nn ACCORDANCE WITH NPDES PERMIT REQUIREMENTS, BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES, CITY REQUIREMENTS AND THE DETAILS SHOWN ON SHEET C3-2 & C8-1 OF THE PROJECT PLANS. B. ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY INCLUDING STOCKPILING, STAGING & PARKING MUST TAKE PLACE ON -SITE. 9. TEMPORARY STREET SIGNS, LIGHTING & ADDRESSES SHALL BE PROVIDED DURING CONSTRUCTION. 10. CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN A CITY & COUNTY PERMIT FOR OBSTRUCTIONS AND WORK WITHIN RIGHT -OF -WAY. PERMIT 15 REQUIRED PRIOR TO REMOVALS OR INSTALLATION. 11. PROTECT EXISTING SITE FEATURES THAT ARE NOT NOTED FOR REMOVAL, IF DISCREPANCIES ARISE, NOTIFY ENGINEER IMA EDIATELY FOR RESOLUTION. 12. WE HAVE SHOWN EXISTING SERVICES BASED ON CITY A5- BUILTS & A GOPHER ONE LOCATE. THERE MAY BE SERVICES THAT ARE NOT SHOWN. c.=...... .f -.e .,e _..., 13. NO WORK TO BE DONE OUTSIDE OF CONSTRUCTION /SILT FENCE WITHOUT PRIOR AUTHORIZATION FROM ENGINEER. 01/05/16 PUD Submittal 14. THE REMOVAL OF EXISTING SERVICES WITHIN THE 03/04/16 Revised PUD Submittal CONSTRUCTION LIMITS SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND UTILITY OWNER. ADDITIONAL SERVICES MAY EXIST THAT ARE NOT SHOWN. 15. SANITARY SEWER SERVICES ARE APPROXIMATE ONLY. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY LOCATION & REMOVE. *SEE TREE PRESERVATION PLAN FOR DETAILS ON TREE REMOVAL \ STANDARDS Y' / �� IxE..cr� -r 'f nn =• )! ,COORDINATE REMOVAL sorr.m„e,c,- f PO OF GAS SERVICE WITH / \+ " REMOVE IX. ( j PROVIDER ' // License No. wdu�. v.�oei -rE 41352 Date + / BUILDINGS iomr /kY.Y / r • , • / ! Loucks Project No. 75631 Project Lead VJV / Dravm By WBS Checked By V3V / Review Date 3/04/16 REMOVE FENCE Co -1 COVER SHEET ' C1 -1 EXISTING CONDITIONS REMOVE OVERHEAD / POWER LINE SERVICE / C1 -2 DEMOLITION PLAN TO HOUSE &GARAGE % ,� - C2 -1 SITE PLAN SEE TREE PRESERVATION PLAN / G1y�1 t:i W REMOVE DRIVEWAY n/� C3- 2 -C3 -4 GR SW PP PLAN J "4i / WARNING ca -1 UTILITY PLAN FOR DETAILS ON TREE REMOVAL ts� /// / S"�72 CB -1 - C8 -2 CIVIL DETAILS E` ,�t:.,. �5: .iY °,p;�:`f> .°f l l l•' l 11 -1 LANDSCAPE PLAN 3 ;' / THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CALLING FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. THEY SHALL COOPERATE WITH 11-2 LANDSCAPE DETAILS REMOVE EX / / / L2 -1 TREE PRESERVATION PLAN " ALL UTILITY COMPANIES IN MAINTAINING THEIR SERVICE AND / OR t 1 CULVERT !! /// P1 -1 PHOTOMETRIC PLAN i < / RELOCATION OF LINES. "cF�{•�J 4l P1 -2 PHOTOMETRIC CUT- SHEETS ' REMOVE FENCE Ex OVERHEAD POWER TO u " ' e '? THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT I x � REMAIN �`'"ti "t ��'r�j, l l l 651-454-0002 AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE FOR THE LOCATIONS `� < -. , mix riuxxo- "''' "`l '' }'S'� / OF ALL UNDERGROUND WIRES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES, ' 1 5xE Inavrxrt uc :� y ru c r ° r VALVES OR OTHER BURIED STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING. THE Y T'rn; / / CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED / - -- DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. ' %�` ��� //� • • CALL BEFORE YOU DIGI 0 30 80 Gopher State One Cal T I IN CITY TOLL FREE: ARE800 21525866002 SCALE IN FEET / / / / a d l { / / / / / / / / / / / / / / k E t° ,� a 5 Q� O v PAT 0000 DINING _ -- ---- co FRED ROOM Jy i DROP -0FF !' A COVERED PORCH 0 DROP -0FF ADA RODEE \ s� 17 d\ CURB TRANSIT ON DOw zoo Imp �o 10 RIO <-- __BLO' 10' 2 16.0 59 REGULARSTALLS 4 ADA STALLS I 63 TOTAL STALLS h • —_- -RIO 10 R3 ADA ROUES PSBL PSBL PSBL I / 0 30 60 - SCALE IN FEET SITE DATA ZONING CURRENT ZONING: R -2A & R -C PROPOSED ZONING: PUD (R -C UNDERLYING) OVERLAY DISTRICT: NA AREA Project Lead TOTAL SITE AREA = 164,053SF, 3.77 ACRES, 100% IMPERVIOUS SURFACE AREA = 85,600SF, 1.97 ACRES, 52.2% PERVIOUS SURFACE AREA = 78,453SF, 1.80 ACRES, 47.8% SETBACKS - PARKING SETBACKS - BUILDING FRONT YARD(CHASKA RD): 15 FT FRONT YARD: 35 FT SIDE SETBACK: 15 FT SIDE YARD: 15 FT REAR SETBACK: 40 FT REAR SETBACK: 40 FT PARKING SURFACE REGULAR STALLS: 59 STALLS SURFACE ACCESSIBLE STALLS: 4 STALLS UNDERGROUND PARKING: 42 STALLS TOTAL STALLS: 105 STALLS HEAVY DUTY PAVEMENT ADA ROUTE SITE PLAN NOTES 1. BACKGROUND INFORMATION IS BASED ON A FIELD SURVEY BY LOUCKS ASSOCIATES AND RECORD UTILITY DRAWINGS FROM THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD. LOUCKS ASSOCIATES DOES NOT GUARANTEE THE ACCURACY OF INFORMATION PROVIDED BY OTHERS. 2. MINNESOTA STATE STATUTE REQUIRES NOTIFICATION PER "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" PRIOR TO COMMENCING ANY GRADING, EXCAVATION OR UNDERGROUND WORK. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES AND TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS FROM THE PLANS. 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN A CITY & COUNTY PERMIT FOR OBSTRUCTIONS AND WORK WITHIN RIGHT -OF -WAY. PERMIT IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO REMOVALS OR INSTALLATION. 5. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE SHOWN TO THE FACE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 6. PROVIDE A 3 FOOT TAPER AT ALL CURB TERMINI 7. ALL PAVING, CONCRETE CURB, GUTTER AND SIDEWALK SHALL BE FURNISHED AND INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DETAILS SHOWN PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY. SEE LANDSCAPE AND ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR ANY ADDITIONAL HARDSCAPE APPLICATIONS. 8. THE CITY DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING AND BUILDING INSPECTIONS DEPT. AND THE CONSTRUCTION ENGINEER SHALL BE NOTIFIED AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO ANY WORK WITHIN THE STREET RIGHT OF WAY (SIDEWALK, STREET OR DRIVEWAYS) '` LOUCKS PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL 7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 v�nv.loucksinccom 01/05/16 PUD Submittal 03/04/16 Revised PUD Submittal 9. ANY SIGN OR FIXTURES REMOVED WITH IN THE RIGHT OF WAY OR AS PART OF THE SITE WORK SHALL BE REPLACED BY THE CONTRACTOR IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY REQUIREMENTS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PRESERVE AND MAINTAIN ANY EXISTING STREET LIGHTS AND TRAFFIC SIGNS PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY. 10. A SIGNIFICANT PORTION OF SITE IMPROVEMENTS NOT SHOWN ON THIS SHEET ARE DESCRIBED AND PROVIDED IN FURTHER DETAIL ON THE ' ARCHITECTURAL AND LANDSCAPE PLANS, THIS INCLUDES LANDSCAPING, LIGHTING AND OTHER FIXTURES. 11. B612 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER SHALL BE INSTALLED AT THE EDGE OF ALL COMMON DRIVES AND PARKING LOTS WITHIN THE SITE, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 12. ALL PARKING LOT PAVEMENT MARKINGS SHALL BE 4" WIDE WHITE PAINTED STRIPING. 13. DISABLED PARKING SIGNAGE & PAVEMENT MARKINGS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ADA & MINNESOTA RULES 1341.0502. 14. CITY ENGINEERING STAFF MUST BE PRESENT TO INSPECT ALL CONCRETE FORMS IN PUBLIC RIGHT -OF -WAY PRIOR TO POUR. MINIMUM 24 HOUR NOTICE REQUIRED. 15. "NO PARKING FIRE LANE" SIGNS MUST BE INSTALLED AS INDICATED BY THE CITY FIRE CHIEF. VERIFY EXACT LOCATIONS AND NUMBER OF REQUIRED SIGNS WITH THE CITY FIRE CHIEF. SIGNAGE MUST BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO THE FINAL OCCUPANCY INSPECTION. WARNING THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CALLING FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. THEY SHALL COOPERATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES IN MAINTAINING THEIR SERVICE AND / OR RELOCATION OF LINES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651 -454 -0002 AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE FOR THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND WIRES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES, VALVES OR OTHER BURIED STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. CALL BEFORE YOU DIGI Gopher State One Call RG'tf'I /+ TWIN CITY AREA: 651- 454 -0002 VTOLL FREE: 1- 800- 252 -1166 License No. 41352 Date Loucks Project No. 15631 Project Lead VJV Drawn By WBS Checked By VJV Review Date 3/04116 CO -1 COVER SHEET C1 -1 EXISTING CONDITIONS C1-2 DEMOLITION PLAN C2 -1 SITE PLAN C3 -1 GRADING PLAN C3- 2 -C3 -4 SWPP PLAN C4 -1 UTILITY PLAN CB -1 - C8-2 CIVIL DETAILS 11 -1 LANDSCAPE PLAN 11 -2 LANDSCAPE DETAILS L2 -1 TREE PRESERVATION PLAN P1 -1 PHOTOMETRIC PLAN P1 -2 PHOTOMETRIC CUT- SHEETS I / / / / / / / / _'6 °44$2'Eo %76. Z/ /// v 52.27 53.4 :7C - 3��3% 55.6 5 6 S,5 / 04 54.3 WITH �fNCES' ' //o // i // �, // ,ir :o i ,pl.� v - - _ _ _ - - - - /// j/ S✓ sl / / /% // /'/ /// / /, / /� " / / / -- �/ 6 4 7.81 �,{ /9/ /. °- '63'.0 o cww� 60.44 1.47 3. 6 S : I / / 1 9/ / sB�� 0., PRO CT EX. PO ER \ \\ \\ \ \� \ I I -' •/ -J2 X62 19 6 961 u 61.25 1.09 -�s y.0 08�DULING GRADfNG VA A \ VA 61.6 2.e v - �\V / 1'62. 62.8/ // /�/ ;' j / 61.05' V "o l TW- g63:p \, \. \ \� \ 63.0.'/ /'/ �'i✓ // ✓/ / /\ , % // / u \ \ \c TVA_Rii�Z t5 GW -962.8 RETAININGWALL� HIGHSIDEW &S- TW -971.0 a GW- 962.3- 0 o TW -972.1 u GW- 962.3- J 3 TW -970.1 a GW -962.3 tt` 62.5 / 66968__J_ -- �J �1W -965.0 - J GW -962.3 RETAINING WALL HIGH SIDE W & S i I I.04 I 61.71 Y- N1912�32- 0 - J15 3 _ --TW -965.8 L AGN�62 -3 -/ GW -962.3 GW -967.8 / 2 / / P / 0 �30 60 %%mm� SCALE IN FEET GRADING PLAN NOTES 1. BACKGROUND INFORMATION IS BASED ON A FIELD SURVEY BY LOUCKS ASSOCIATES AND RECORD UTILITY DRAWINGS FROM THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD. LOUCKS ASSOCIATES DOES NOT GUARANTEE THE ACCURACY OF INFORMATION PROVIDED BY OTHERS. 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS OF BUILDINGS, VESTIBULES, SLOPED PAVING, EXIT PORCHES, RAMPS, TRUCK DOCKS, ENTRY LOCATIONS AND LOCATIONS OF DOWNSPOUTS. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE ALL PRECAUTIONS NECESSARY TO AVOID PROPERTY DAMAGE TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PHASE OF THIS PROJECT. THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE HELD RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DAMAGES TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES OCCURRING DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PHASE OF THIS PROJECT. 4. IN ACCORDANCE WITH GENERALLY ACCEPTED CONSTRUCTION PRACTICES, THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE SOLELY AND COMPLETELY RESPONSIBLE FOR CONDITIONS ON THE JOB SITE, INCLUDING SAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY DURING THE PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK. THIS REQUIREMENT WILL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS. 5. BEFORE BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL A TEMPORARY ROCK ENTRANCE PAD AT ALL POINTS OF VEHICLE EXIT FROM THE PROJECT SITE. SAID ROCK ENTRANCE PAD SHALL BE MAINTAINED BY THE CONTRACTOR FOR THE DURATION OF THE PROJECT. 6. EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE ESTABLISHED AROUND THE ENTIRE SITE PERIMETER AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH NPDES PERMIT REQUIREMENTS, BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES, AND CITY REQUIREMENTS. 7. ALL SPOT ELEVATIONS SHOWN REPRESENT FINISHED SURFACE OR GUTTER LINE ELEVATIONS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 8. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY EXISTING INFORMATION PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AND NOTIFY ENGINEER OF ANY PLAN DISCREPANCIES. 9. EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS AS -PER CITY AS -BUILT PLANS AND FIELD SHOTS. 10. SEE SHEET C3 -2 FOR EROSION CONTROL INFORMATION. 11. GENERAL CONTRACTOR MUST VERIFY ALL TIE IN GRADES. 12. REFER TO GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR MORE INFORMATION. 13. ADA ACCESSIBLE ROUTE SHALL HAVE A 5.0% MAXIMUM SLOPE IN THE DIRECTION OF TRAVEL AND A 2.0% MAXIMUM CROSS - SLOPE. 14. ACCESSIBLE STALLS, ACCESS AISLES AND 60" TURNING CIRCLES SHALL HAVE A 2.0% MAXIMUM SLOPE IN ANY DIRECTION. ABBREVIATION LEGEND FFE= FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION TW =TOP OF RETAINING WALL GW= GROUND AT FACE OF RETAINING WALL HP =HIGH POINT LP =LOW POINT TC =TOP OF CURB GL= GUTTER LINE LEGEND EXISTING PROPOSED TOPOGRAPHIC CONTOUR '_BOO SPOT ELEVATION X800.0 DRAINAGE SLOPE X.XX% ST STORM SEWER O STORM MANHOLE O 8 (0) CATCH BASIN SS SANITARY SEWER -Y/I'o WATERMAIN BENCHMARK EMERGENCY OVERFLOW CONSTRUCTION LIMITS ADA ROUTE HEAVY DUTY PAVEMENT NOTE: CATCH BASINS RIMS ARE 2 INCHES LOWER THAN FLOW LINE ELEVATION. NOTE: SPOT ELEVATIONS AT CURB LINES INDICATE BASE OF CURB AND GUTTER LINE (I.E. FLOW LINE) ELEVATIONS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. WARNING THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CALLING FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. THEY SHALL COOPERATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES IN MAINTAINING THEIR SERVICE AND / OR RELOCATION OF LINES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651 -454 -0002 AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE FOR THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND WIRES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES, VALVES OR OTHER BURIED STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. CALL BEFORE YOU DIGI Gopher State One Call �y TWIN CITY AREA: 651- 454 -0002 VTOLL FREE: 1 -800- 252 -1166 mm LOUCKS PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL 7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 w-A.ucksi -com CADD. QUALIFICATION'I e SU MITTAL/REVISIONS' pa�edd tr, d MJ.3t rrs °i tr r :om a' .v Ucense No. 47352 Date Loucks Project No. 15631 Project Lead VJV Drawn ey WBS Checked By VJV Review Date 3/04/16 CO -1 COVER SHEET C1 -1 EXISTING CONDITIONS C1 -2 DEMOUTION PLAN C2 -1 SITE PLAN C3 -1 GRADING PLAN C3- 2 -C3-4 SWPP PLAN C4 -1 UTILITY PLAN C8- 1 -C8 -2 CIVIL DETAILS 11 -1 LANDSCAPE PLAN 11 -2 LANDSCAPE DETAILS L2 -1 TREE PRESERVATION PLAN PI -1 PHOTOMETRIC PLAN P1 -2 PHOTOMETRIC CUT- SHEETS / / P / 0 �30 60 %%mm� SCALE IN FEET GRADING PLAN NOTES 1. BACKGROUND INFORMATION IS BASED ON A FIELD SURVEY BY LOUCKS ASSOCIATES AND RECORD UTILITY DRAWINGS FROM THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD. LOUCKS ASSOCIATES DOES NOT GUARANTEE THE ACCURACY OF INFORMATION PROVIDED BY OTHERS. 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS OF BUILDINGS, VESTIBULES, SLOPED PAVING, EXIT PORCHES, RAMPS, TRUCK DOCKS, ENTRY LOCATIONS AND LOCATIONS OF DOWNSPOUTS. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE ALL PRECAUTIONS NECESSARY TO AVOID PROPERTY DAMAGE TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PHASE OF THIS PROJECT. THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE HELD RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DAMAGES TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES OCCURRING DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PHASE OF THIS PROJECT. 4. IN ACCORDANCE WITH GENERALLY ACCEPTED CONSTRUCTION PRACTICES, THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE SOLELY AND COMPLETELY RESPONSIBLE FOR CONDITIONS ON THE JOB SITE, INCLUDING SAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY DURING THE PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK. THIS REQUIREMENT WILL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS. 5. BEFORE BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL A TEMPORARY ROCK ENTRANCE PAD AT ALL POINTS OF VEHICLE EXIT FROM THE PROJECT SITE. SAID ROCK ENTRANCE PAD SHALL BE MAINTAINED BY THE CONTRACTOR FOR THE DURATION OF THE PROJECT. 6. EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE ESTABLISHED AROUND THE ENTIRE SITE PERIMETER AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH NPDES PERMIT REQUIREMENTS, BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES, AND CITY REQUIREMENTS. 7. ALL SPOT ELEVATIONS SHOWN REPRESENT FINISHED SURFACE OR GUTTER LINE ELEVATIONS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 8. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY EXISTING INFORMATION PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AND NOTIFY ENGINEER OF ANY PLAN DISCREPANCIES. 9. EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS AS -PER CITY AS -BUILT PLANS AND FIELD SHOTS. 10. SEE SHEET C3 -2 FOR EROSION CONTROL INFORMATION. 11. GENERAL CONTRACTOR MUST VERIFY ALL TIE IN GRADES. 12. REFER TO GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR MORE INFORMATION. 13. ADA ACCESSIBLE ROUTE SHALL HAVE A 5.0% MAXIMUM SLOPE IN THE DIRECTION OF TRAVEL AND A 2.0% MAXIMUM CROSS - SLOPE. 14. ACCESSIBLE STALLS, ACCESS AISLES AND 60" TURNING CIRCLES SHALL HAVE A 2.0% MAXIMUM SLOPE IN ANY DIRECTION. ABBREVIATION LEGEND FFE= FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION TW =TOP OF RETAINING WALL GW= GROUND AT FACE OF RETAINING WALL HP =HIGH POINT LP =LOW POINT TC =TOP OF CURB GL= GUTTER LINE LEGEND EXISTING PROPOSED TOPOGRAPHIC CONTOUR '_BOO SPOT ELEVATION X800.0 DRAINAGE SLOPE X.XX% ST STORM SEWER O STORM MANHOLE O 8 (0) CATCH BASIN SS SANITARY SEWER -Y/I'o WATERMAIN BENCHMARK EMERGENCY OVERFLOW CONSTRUCTION LIMITS ADA ROUTE HEAVY DUTY PAVEMENT NOTE: CATCH BASINS RIMS ARE 2 INCHES LOWER THAN FLOW LINE ELEVATION. NOTE: SPOT ELEVATIONS AT CURB LINES INDICATE BASE OF CURB AND GUTTER LINE (I.E. FLOW LINE) ELEVATIONS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. WARNING THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CALLING FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. THEY SHALL COOPERATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES IN MAINTAINING THEIR SERVICE AND / OR RELOCATION OF LINES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651 -454 -0002 AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE FOR THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND WIRES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES, VALVES OR OTHER BURIED STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. CALL BEFORE YOU DIGI Gopher State One Call �y TWIN CITY AREA: 651- 454 -0002 VTOLL FREE: 1 -800- 252 -1166 mm LOUCKS PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL 7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 w-A.ucksi -com CADD. QUALIFICATION'I e SU MITTAL/REVISIONS' pa�edd tr, d MJ.3t rrs °i tr r :om a' .v Ucense No. 47352 Date Loucks Project No. 15631 Project Lead VJV Drawn ey WBS Checked By VJV Review Date 3/04/16 CO -1 COVER SHEET C1 -1 EXISTING CONDITIONS C1 -2 DEMOUTION PLAN C2 -1 SITE PLAN C3 -1 GRADING PLAN C3- 2 -C3-4 SWPP PLAN C4 -1 UTILITY PLAN C8- 1 -C8 -2 CIVIL DETAILS 11 -1 LANDSCAPE PLAN 11 -2 LANDSCAPE DETAILS L2 -1 TREE PRESERVATION PLAN PI -1 PHOTOMETRIC PLAN P1 -2 PHOTOMETRIC CUT- SHEETS NOTE: CATCH BASINS RIMS ARE 2 INCHES LOWER THAN FLOW LINE ELEVATION. NOTE: SPOT ELEVATIONS AT CURB LINES INDICATE BASE OF CURB AND GUTTER LINE (I.E. FLOW LINE) ELEVATIONS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. WARNING THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CALLING FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. THEY SHALL COOPERATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES IN MAINTAINING THEIR SERVICE AND / OR RELOCATION OF LINES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651 -454 -0002 AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE FOR THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND WIRES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES, VALVES OR OTHER BURIED STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. CALL BEFORE YOU DIGI Gopher State One Call �y TWIN CITY AREA: 651- 454 -0002 VTOLL FREE: 1 -800- 252 -1166 mm LOUCKS PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL 7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 w-A.ucksi -com CADD. QUALIFICATION'I e SU MITTAL/REVISIONS' pa�edd tr, d MJ.3t rrs °i tr r :om a' .v Ucense No. 47352 Date Loucks Project No. 15631 Project Lead VJV Drawn ey WBS Checked By VJV Review Date 3/04/16 CO -1 COVER SHEET C1 -1 EXISTING CONDITIONS C1 -2 DEMOUTION PLAN C2 -1 SITE PLAN C3 -1 GRADING PLAN C3- 2 -C3-4 SWPP PLAN C4 -1 UTILITY PLAN C8- 1 -C8 -2 CIVIL DETAILS 11 -1 LANDSCAPE PLAN 11 -2 LANDSCAPE DETAILS L2 -1 TREE PRESERVATION PLAN PI -1 PHOTOMETRIC PLAN P1 -2 PHOTOMETRIC CUT- SHEETS / j /,� /�N //� �/ ♦�l�J(f�� // / / r�``� j // / /jrr �ti.✓'t_ — / A /�/ pR gstalls 54.0 (/5349 \� A 3.3 51 4 / 55.6 '- •`6 / "- 's5 ., / / ; z.0 54 7 , 51.5 1' ,. /� // � //S / �// J— Q4 '5073 V Tc61.43 T. / / /// � // / o � i-��� � � •� / � Q . x� / /ff 2 1°d1' � /�; er, �/� >i7 � ' n. / / 3,j /!�(�0 2 59.22,\.... $�� N',� ���i��� Gbz Pr. �1i '.7 nad��l l•, r EXE / �` N az -a e o SAO` ��,.x % w /// ? 6R s 7 % AsHqu CONCR / d a 6- ,; /• I I y x° j�� � ✓ / /' y �y57' i �5 � - ,6\062.8, 630 -636 OFntl Spacial W tens TBD < > zz c � RuRar D'stance.� 4Nes cl ��„� _ / 1 T62.7/,r_ 62 54, `161 9/ 30" - 5 ' 6224 5210 79 7 k5 /r ' / / s;)'' 63.0 BAD 2 %— "L>aP1.09— to boa Yr 04 / "6E 1 4? x„1 THE CONTRACT R EXISTING OnJEES. nwlrrrawNCTH❑ THE C.HT O. LEAST 48 T— In X6016 ( / / / \ I � PROT TEX. POWER EU UTRE" ED DU ING GRADNG �116 / n ,12 / Constmtl'on Slormv;star Special Waters Search '= IAnnesota PaIIWan BULOAgency CALL BEFORE YOU DIGI Gopher State One Cal l _ �1YM1 CFFi'- kREA:fi5} --454 -0002 TOLL FREE: I -BDO- 252 -1166 OFntl Spacial W tens TBD < > 11— a) curosrstruden ads and fnd special —'era: c � RuRar D'stance.� 4Nes cl ��„� r LAND SURVEYING LF x.,,tAf LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE EA Endine YAtP L FO COIsr ©DUBlne caoc IIPI Ell ENVIRONMENTAL N 0.9 Select features fi rn ImpalleO Lake $ PHOTOMETRIC CUT- SHEETS Maple Grove MN 55369 763 424 5505 J K Search •� j op nI -0 FEATes Seledes 0 LAKE MINNETONKA SITE LOCATION 1 MILE RADIUS SEARCH IAapcoments _ FJ Special Waters M A I IPCAUsted Calcareous Fen M A DIER Uslea Calcareous Fen �— ynd—see Ate. �— IAeslsslppl Rifer - Scenic and Recreational Rhar Segments �— TreutsEeem 0 00 N tI .,I F H PROJECT LOCATION COUNTY I SECTION TOWNSHIP RANGE LATITUDE LONGITUDE HENNEPIN 34 117N 23W 44.8945 - 93.5729 PERMANENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT X INFILTRATION STORMWATER HARVEST AND REUSE FILTRATION 0 �30 80 %%miiiiiiiiiiil SCALE IN FEET BLE OR CALUN FOR L6GATIONS OF ALL IL, E .VEER �L Uill/TY CO \1PANIES IN v L To. OF E5. / 11-10`` HER STATE L' ?.Zli245J- 0002.0E LOCATIONS E ALL /.INDERGROUND WIRES, uvES OR OF ER BugIED STRUCTURES BEFORE a�u CALL BEFORE YOU DIGI Gopher State One Cal l _ �1YM1 CFFi'- kREA:fi5} --454 -0002 TOLL FREE: I -BDO- 252 -1166 MR OR REP .CE THE ABOVE IVHEN DAh1ACED -_ THE OWN /rq_ 1 TYPICAL SUBSURFACE SOIL STRATUM � STRATUM LOUCKS MATERIAL DESCRTION 1 TBD TED PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING TBD TBD 3 TBD TBD LAND SURVEYING LF x.,,tAf LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE EA 16 ENVIRONMENTAL N 0.9 7200 Hemlock Lane Su to 300 P1 -2 PHOTOMETRIC CUT- SHEETS Maple Grove MN 55369 763 424 5505 TYPICAL SUBSURFACE SOIL STRATUM � STRATUM DEPTH TO BASE OF STRATUM BELOW EXISTING GRADE MATERIAL DESCRTION 1 TBD TED 2 TBD TBD 3 TBD TBD X WET SEDIMENTATION BASIN *SEE GEOTHICAL REPORT AS PART OF SWPPP FOR REGIONAL PONDP ADDITIONAL SOILS INFORMATION RECEIVING WATERS NAME OF WATER BODY TYPE OF WATER BODY SPECIAL WATER IMAIRED WATER TYPE OF SPECIAL WATER GALPIN LAKE LAKE NO NO NA LF 1030 ROCK LOG LF 0 INLET PROTECTION EA 16 TURF RESTORATION AC 0.9 PHOTOMETRIC PLAN P1 -2 PHOTOMETRIC CUT- SHEETS ESTIMATED OUANTITIES DESCRIPTION UNIT QUANTITY TEMPORARY ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE EA 1 PREFABRICATED CONCRETE WASHOUT EA 1 SILT FENCE (STANDARD) LF 1030 ROCK LOG LF 0 INLET PROTECTION EA 16 TURF RESTORATION AC 0.9 SITE PLAN LEGEND —SF SILT FENCE e 41352 INLET PROTECTION DEMOUTION PLAN EXISTING DRAINAGE BOUNDARY SITE PLAN EXISTING DRAINAGE PATTERN GRADING PLAN PROPOSED DRAINAGE BOUNDARY PROPOSED DRAINAGE PATTERN - -- ROCKLOG BENCHMARK TOP NUT HYDRANT LOCATED ON THE NORTHERLY SIDE OF VETERANS DRIVE APPROX. 80 FEET WEST OF THE MOST WESTERLI' PROPERTY CORNER. ELEVATION= 870.23 FEET (NAVD 1988) SEE SITE SURVEY PROVIDED BY EFN INC., DATED 12- 30 -14. FOR GRAPHIC REFERENCE SUBMITTAUREVISIONS r r Ihweba f M1a th zpeof. nzs License No. e 41352 Date DEMOUTION PLAN Loucks Project No. 15631 Project Lead viv Drawn By WBS Checked By VJV Ravi —Date 3/04/16 C01 COVER SHEET Ci -1 EXISTING CONDITIONS Ct -2 DEMOUTION PLAN C2 -1 SITE PLAN C3 -1 GRADING PLAN C3- 2 -C3 -4 SWPP PLAN UTILITY PLAN CB- 1 -CS-2 CIVIL DETAILS 11 -1 LANDSCAPE PLAN L1 -2 LANDSCAPE DETAILS L2 -1 TREE PRESERVATION PLAN PIT PHOTOMETRIC PLAN P1 -2 PHOTOMETRIC CUT- SHEETS / 1 AM / / / / / I / I / / / I / < // -- -- -- n '7f CU 7 I / RIM -95094 ve/ INV- 951.29 3' SUM11P -949.8 / V 10' SANITARY STUB INV - 940.10 / / / / CB 1 RIM -960.6 INV -957.6 5'18'H PE 13.4% INLET -955.0 0% / IT / o h FES} D INV -9 0 0° PVC CLFANOUT RIM -953.0 INV- 947.70 TO. PVC SANITARY SERVICE ® 0.53% OCS 8 RIM -957.0 INV- 951.78 TOP WEIR -956.0 8° ORIFICE -954.0 24 - 60' CMP OUTLET -952.0 PERFORATED CHAMBERS BTM ROCK -952.0 PIPE INV -952.5 TOP PIPE -957.5 TOP ROCK -958.0 Vi "W "k, HYD W /6° GV L 6° DIP LEAD 115'18'R( 0.8 %61'' CBMH 4 RIM -960.8 I111954.66 - 95' 12° HDPE ®0.8% 68' 15 °HDPE J jn OCS 6 RIM -954.0 / .� INV -946.5 i TOP WEIR -953.0 A e8 °ORIFICE -951.0 o do L 0 - - / / 3 / / POND q' / 1.0 / HWL -9/4.0 STMH 9 RIM 957.23 i APPROXIMATE _ INV- 951.29 _ LOCATION OF 3'SUMP- 949.11- - - \ - - \- °�- - _ WATERMAIN y ;r} BOUGHTTO SITE BY CITY. \ / a 'CT 1__ SANITARY SERVICE 3' Nf _ / I 0 EXISTING MILL o- I�kEF -947.0 -0 8 132' F0" PVC ® HYD W /62 GV SANITARY DIP F G I V -954.0 / SERVICE @ 0.53% B10 / ^ RIM -959.6 / $4' 12° HOE / INV- 955.18 ®0.93% / - 2 -45 D / Sid BENDS 7' 18° CP/ 3 0.88% R / IF CONNECT TO CITY WATER CB 6 ,�NV -954.5 WITH 6' TEE, 6° GV & RIM- 957.23 /f ,7- !',NTINUE AS SHOWN. INV -952.8 /�� j .� / / 3' SUMP -949.8 / / / CC, TO CITY WATER C H INLTEE, I. GV G & Cp MINUETO BLDG SHOWN. `60' 15° HDPE / / / INLET ESE / 4 INV -959.0 RCP CONNECT / CO NECT TO CITY WATER ^.)jH 10° TEE, 10° GV & / NTINgE TO BLDG SHO-1,VN. FES D d' INV-95/.5 , / FES c INV- 9r/i.0 / 0 30 60 38 18 P FES B / / SCALE IN FEET INV163.93� NOTES 1. BACKGROUND INFORMATION IS BASED ON A FIELD SURVEY 61' LOUCKS ASSOCIATES AND RECORD UTILITY DRAWINGS FROM THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD. LOUCKS ASSOCIATES DOES NOT GUARANTEE THE ACCURACY OF INFORMATION PROVIDED BY OTHERS. 2. ALL SANITARY SEWER, STORM SEWER AND WATERMAIN UTILITIES SHALL BE FURNISHED AND INSTALLED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SPECIFICATIONS, THE CITY AND THE STANDARD UTILITIES SPECIFICATION OF THE CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA (CLAM), 1999 EDITION. HDPE PIPE CONNECTIONS INTO ALL CONCRETE STRUCTURES SHALL BE MADE WITH WATER TIGHT MATERIALS, UTILIZING AN A -LOK OR WATERSTOP GASKET OR BOOT, CAST -IN -PLACE RUBBER BOOT, OR APPROVED EQUAL. WHERE THE ALIGNMENT PRECLUDES THE USE OF THE ABOVE APPROVED WATERTIGHT METHODS, CONSEAL 231 WATERSTOP SEALANT, OR APPROVED EQUAL WILL ONLY BE ALLOWED AS APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. ALL SANITARY SEWER MAIN LINE SHALL BE SDR 35. ALL SANITARY SEWER SERVICES SHALL BE SDR 26. 3. SEE SHEETS C8 -1 AND THE CONTRACT SPECIFICATIONS FOR SPECIFIC UTILITY DETAILS AND UTILITY SERVICE DETAILS. 4. ALL UTILITY PIPE BEDDING SHALL BE COMPACTED SAND OR FINE GRANULAR MATERIAL PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY. ALL COMPACTION SHALL BE PERFORMED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CEAM SPECIFICATION. 5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651 -454 -0002 AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO PERFORMING ANY EXCAVATION OR UNDERGROUND WORK. 6. ADJUST ALL EXISTING STRUCTURES, BOTH PUBLIC AND PRIVATE TO THE PROPOSED GRADES WHERE DISTURBED AND COMPLY WITH ALL REQUIREMENTS OF THE UTILITY OWNERS. STRUCTURES BEING RESET TO PAVED AREAS MUST MEET OWNERS REQUIREMENTS FOR TRAFFIC LOADING. 7. PROPOSED PIPE MATERIALS: STORM SEWER N12 HDPE -%VT 12 "- IB "DIAhFER STORM SEWER RCPCLASSS 12 " -24 "DIAMETER ROOF DRAIN LEADS N12 HDPEAVT 12" DIAMETER WATER SERVICE 2" COPPER TYPE K, 8.0' BURY DEPTH WATER SERVICE 10" DIP CL52 B.D' BURY DEPTH SANITARY SEWER I PVC SDR 35 SERVICE 8. STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL MEET OF EXCEED AASHTO &1294 MINIMUM PIPE STIFFNESS PER ASTM D2412 60PSI FOR W -18 9. PROPOSED GAS, TELEPHONE & ELECTRIC SERVICES ARE APPROXIMATE LOCATIONS ONLY. COORDINATE EACH SERVICE WITH THE UTILITY OWNER AND GENERAL CONTRACTOR. IF ANY PROPOSED SERVICE LOCATION VARY SIGNIFICANTLY OR CONFLICT, THE ENGINEER MUST BE NOTIFIED PRIOR TO THE INSTALLATION OF THE SERVICE. 10. THE REMOVAL OF EXISTING SERVICES WITHIN THE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND UTILITY OWNER. ADDITIONAL SERVICES MAY EXIST. 11. ALL WATER SERVICES MUST BE INSTALLED AT A 9.0 -FT BURY DEPTH. 11.1. INSULATE ALL CROSSINGS INVOLVING WATER AND SEWER. NOTES 1. PVC SANITARY SEWERS MUST MEET ONE OF THE FOLLOWING ASTM STANDARDS: D3034, F789, D2665, OR F891. ASTM D2241 PIPE MAY BE USED FOR SEWERS &INCH AND LARGER. THE INSTALLATION MUST COMPLY WITH ASTM D2321, WHICH REQUIRES INSTALLATION BY OPEN TRENCH ON A CONTINUOUS GRANULAR BED (SEE MINNESOTA RULES, PART 4715.0530). 2. RCP STORM SEWERS MUST COMPLY WITH ASTM C76 (SEE MINNESOTA RULES, PART 4715.0540). 3. HIGH - DENSITY POLYETHYLENE (HDPE) STORM DRAINS MUST COMPLY WITH MINNESOTA RULES, PART 4715.0540: 3.1. PIPES 4 -INCH TO 10 -INCH IN SIZE MUST COMPLY WITH AASHTO M252. 3.2. PIPES 12 -INCH TO 60 -INCH IN SIZE MUST COMPLY WITH ASTM F2306. 3.3. ALL FITTINGS MUST COMPLY WITH ASTM D3212. 3.4. WATER -TIGHT JOINTS MUST BE USED AT ALL CONNECTIONS INCLUDING STRUCTURES. 4. ALL JOINTS AND CONNECTIONS IN THE STORM SEWER SYSTEM SHALL BE GASTIGHT OR WATERTIGHT (SEE MINNESOTA RULES, PART 4715.0700). APPROVED RESILIENT RUBBER JOINTS MUST BE USED TO MAKE WATERTIGHT CONNECTIONS TO MANHOLES, CATCHBASINS, AND OTHER STRUCTURES. S. WATER SERVICE LINES MUST BE INSTALLED AT LEAST 10 -FEET HORIZONTALLY FROM ANY MANHOLE, CATCHBASIN, OR OTHER SOURCE OF CONTAMINATION, MEASURED FROM OUTER EDGE OF THE PIPE TO THE OUTER EDGE OF THE CONTAMINATION SOURCE (SEE MINNESOTA RULES, PART 4715.1710, SUBPART 3). 6. THE BOTTOM OF WATER SERVICE PIPES LOCATED WITHIN 10 -FEET OF THE SEWER CROSSING MUST BE AT LEAST 12- INCHES ABOVE THE TOP OF THE SEWER. WHEN THIS IS NOT FEASIBLE, THE SEWER PIPE MUST BE CONSTRUCTED OF MATERIALS LISTED IN MINNESOTA RULES, PART 4715.1710, SUBPART 2, E. THE WATER SERVICE SHOULD NOT CONTAIN ANY JOINTS OR CONNECTIONS WITHIN 1 OTEET OF A CROSSING. 7. ALL PORTIONS OF THE STORM SEWER SYSTEM LOCATED WITHIN 10 -FEET OF THE BUILDING OR WATER SERVICE LINE MUST BE TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH MINNESOTA RULES, PART 4715.2820. WARNING THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CALLING FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. THEY SHALL COOPERATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES IN MAINTAINING THEIR SERVICE AND / OR RELOCATION OF LINES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651 -454 -0002 AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE FOR THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND WIRES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES, VALVES OR OTHER BURIED STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. CALL BEFCRE YOU DIGI Gopher State One Call TWIN CITY AREA: 651- 454 -0002 V TOLL FREE: 1 -800- 252 -1166 1111"I"' m LOUCKS PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL 7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 vrnv.louckSi cam 01/05/16 PUD Submittal 03104/16 Revised PUD Submittal License Na. 41352 Data Loucks Project No. 15631 Project Lead VJV Drawn By WBS - -- VJV Review Date 3/04/16 STMHS - - - � C1 -1 EXISTING CONDITIONS C1 -2 DEMOLITION PLAN `-I RIM -962.0 SITE PLAN C3 -1 GRADING PLAN L, SWPP PLAN INV- 953.74 UTILITY PLAN CB -1 - C8 -2 CIVIL DETAILS L1 -1 LANDSCAPE PLAN 3' SUMP- 950.74 LANDSCAPE DETAILS L2 -1 TREE L T- I PHOTOMETRIC PLAN I Ll { 0 I CBMH 2 c CBMH 3 RIM -960.6 RIM - 961.83 INV- 956.36 INV- 955.42 -L 155'12 °HDPE ®O.B % IITT2 °HDPE ®0.0 % I L - - -Z �- -_L f -- - - - _ -- -F_ - -J Vi "W "k, HYD W /6° GV L 6° DIP LEAD 115'18'R( 0.8 %61'' CBMH 4 RIM -960.8 I111954.66 - 95' 12° HDPE ®0.8% 68' 15 °HDPE J jn OCS 6 RIM -954.0 / .� INV -946.5 i TOP WEIR -953.0 A e8 °ORIFICE -951.0 o do L 0 - - / / 3 / / POND q' / 1.0 / HWL -9/4.0 STMH 9 RIM 957.23 i APPROXIMATE _ INV- 951.29 _ LOCATION OF 3'SUMP- 949.11- - - \ - - \- °�- - _ WATERMAIN y ;r} BOUGHTTO SITE BY CITY. \ / a 'CT 1__ SANITARY SERVICE 3' Nf _ / I 0 EXISTING MILL o- I�kEF -947.0 -0 8 132' F0" PVC ® HYD W /62 GV SANITARY DIP F G I V -954.0 / SERVICE @ 0.53% B10 / ^ RIM -959.6 / $4' 12° HOE / INV- 955.18 ®0.93% / - 2 -45 D / Sid BENDS 7' 18° CP/ 3 0.88% R / IF CONNECT TO CITY WATER CB 6 ,�NV -954.5 WITH 6' TEE, 6° GV & RIM- 957.23 /f ,7- !',NTINUE AS SHOWN. INV -952.8 /�� j .� / / 3' SUMP -949.8 / / / CC, TO CITY WATER C H INLTEE, I. GV G & Cp MINUETO BLDG SHOWN. `60' 15° HDPE / / / INLET ESE / 4 INV -959.0 RCP CONNECT / CO NECT TO CITY WATER ^.)jH 10° TEE, 10° GV & / NTINgE TO BLDG SHO-1,VN. FES D d' INV-95/.5 , / FES c INV- 9r/i.0 / 0 30 60 38 18 P FES B / / SCALE IN FEET INV163.93� NOTES 1. BACKGROUND INFORMATION IS BASED ON A FIELD SURVEY 61' LOUCKS ASSOCIATES AND RECORD UTILITY DRAWINGS FROM THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD. LOUCKS ASSOCIATES DOES NOT GUARANTEE THE ACCURACY OF INFORMATION PROVIDED BY OTHERS. 2. ALL SANITARY SEWER, STORM SEWER AND WATERMAIN UTILITIES SHALL BE FURNISHED AND INSTALLED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SPECIFICATIONS, THE CITY AND THE STANDARD UTILITIES SPECIFICATION OF THE CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA (CLAM), 1999 EDITION. HDPE PIPE CONNECTIONS INTO ALL CONCRETE STRUCTURES SHALL BE MADE WITH WATER TIGHT MATERIALS, UTILIZING AN A -LOK OR WATERSTOP GASKET OR BOOT, CAST -IN -PLACE RUBBER BOOT, OR APPROVED EQUAL. WHERE THE ALIGNMENT PRECLUDES THE USE OF THE ABOVE APPROVED WATERTIGHT METHODS, CONSEAL 231 WATERSTOP SEALANT, OR APPROVED EQUAL WILL ONLY BE ALLOWED AS APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. ALL SANITARY SEWER MAIN LINE SHALL BE SDR 35. ALL SANITARY SEWER SERVICES SHALL BE SDR 26. 3. SEE SHEETS C8 -1 AND THE CONTRACT SPECIFICATIONS FOR SPECIFIC UTILITY DETAILS AND UTILITY SERVICE DETAILS. 4. ALL UTILITY PIPE BEDDING SHALL BE COMPACTED SAND OR FINE GRANULAR MATERIAL PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY. ALL COMPACTION SHALL BE PERFORMED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CEAM SPECIFICATION. 5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651 -454 -0002 AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO PERFORMING ANY EXCAVATION OR UNDERGROUND WORK. 6. ADJUST ALL EXISTING STRUCTURES, BOTH PUBLIC AND PRIVATE TO THE PROPOSED GRADES WHERE DISTURBED AND COMPLY WITH ALL REQUIREMENTS OF THE UTILITY OWNERS. STRUCTURES BEING RESET TO PAVED AREAS MUST MEET OWNERS REQUIREMENTS FOR TRAFFIC LOADING. 7. PROPOSED PIPE MATERIALS: STORM SEWER N12 HDPE -%VT 12 "- IB "DIAhFER STORM SEWER RCPCLASSS 12 " -24 "DIAMETER ROOF DRAIN LEADS N12 HDPEAVT 12" DIAMETER WATER SERVICE 2" COPPER TYPE K, 8.0' BURY DEPTH WATER SERVICE 10" DIP CL52 B.D' BURY DEPTH SANITARY SEWER I PVC SDR 35 SERVICE 8. STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL MEET OF EXCEED AASHTO &1294 MINIMUM PIPE STIFFNESS PER ASTM D2412 60PSI FOR W -18 9. PROPOSED GAS, TELEPHONE & ELECTRIC SERVICES ARE APPROXIMATE LOCATIONS ONLY. COORDINATE EACH SERVICE WITH THE UTILITY OWNER AND GENERAL CONTRACTOR. IF ANY PROPOSED SERVICE LOCATION VARY SIGNIFICANTLY OR CONFLICT, THE ENGINEER MUST BE NOTIFIED PRIOR TO THE INSTALLATION OF THE SERVICE. 10. THE REMOVAL OF EXISTING SERVICES WITHIN THE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND UTILITY OWNER. ADDITIONAL SERVICES MAY EXIST. 11. ALL WATER SERVICES MUST BE INSTALLED AT A 9.0 -FT BURY DEPTH. 11.1. INSULATE ALL CROSSINGS INVOLVING WATER AND SEWER. NOTES 1. PVC SANITARY SEWERS MUST MEET ONE OF THE FOLLOWING ASTM STANDARDS: D3034, F789, D2665, OR F891. ASTM D2241 PIPE MAY BE USED FOR SEWERS &INCH AND LARGER. THE INSTALLATION MUST COMPLY WITH ASTM D2321, WHICH REQUIRES INSTALLATION BY OPEN TRENCH ON A CONTINUOUS GRANULAR BED (SEE MINNESOTA RULES, PART 4715.0530). 2. RCP STORM SEWERS MUST COMPLY WITH ASTM C76 (SEE MINNESOTA RULES, PART 4715.0540). 3. HIGH - DENSITY POLYETHYLENE (HDPE) STORM DRAINS MUST COMPLY WITH MINNESOTA RULES, PART 4715.0540: 3.1. PIPES 4 -INCH TO 10 -INCH IN SIZE MUST COMPLY WITH AASHTO M252. 3.2. PIPES 12 -INCH TO 60 -INCH IN SIZE MUST COMPLY WITH ASTM F2306. 3.3. ALL FITTINGS MUST COMPLY WITH ASTM D3212. 3.4. WATER -TIGHT JOINTS MUST BE USED AT ALL CONNECTIONS INCLUDING STRUCTURES. 4. ALL JOINTS AND CONNECTIONS IN THE STORM SEWER SYSTEM SHALL BE GASTIGHT OR WATERTIGHT (SEE MINNESOTA RULES, PART 4715.0700). APPROVED RESILIENT RUBBER JOINTS MUST BE USED TO MAKE WATERTIGHT CONNECTIONS TO MANHOLES, CATCHBASINS, AND OTHER STRUCTURES. S. WATER SERVICE LINES MUST BE INSTALLED AT LEAST 10 -FEET HORIZONTALLY FROM ANY MANHOLE, CATCHBASIN, OR OTHER SOURCE OF CONTAMINATION, MEASURED FROM OUTER EDGE OF THE PIPE TO THE OUTER EDGE OF THE CONTAMINATION SOURCE (SEE MINNESOTA RULES, PART 4715.1710, SUBPART 3). 6. THE BOTTOM OF WATER SERVICE PIPES LOCATED WITHIN 10 -FEET OF THE SEWER CROSSING MUST BE AT LEAST 12- INCHES ABOVE THE TOP OF THE SEWER. WHEN THIS IS NOT FEASIBLE, THE SEWER PIPE MUST BE CONSTRUCTED OF MATERIALS LISTED IN MINNESOTA RULES, PART 4715.1710, SUBPART 2, E. THE WATER SERVICE SHOULD NOT CONTAIN ANY JOINTS OR CONNECTIONS WITHIN 1 OTEET OF A CROSSING. 7. ALL PORTIONS OF THE STORM SEWER SYSTEM LOCATED WITHIN 10 -FEET OF THE BUILDING OR WATER SERVICE LINE MUST BE TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH MINNESOTA RULES, PART 4715.2820. WARNING THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CALLING FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. THEY SHALL COOPERATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES IN MAINTAINING THEIR SERVICE AND / OR RELOCATION OF LINES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651 -454 -0002 AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE FOR THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND WIRES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES, VALVES OR OTHER BURIED STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. CALL BEFCRE YOU DIGI Gopher State One Call TWIN CITY AREA: 651- 454 -0002 V TOLL FREE: 1 -800- 252 -1166 1111"I"' m LOUCKS PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL 7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 vrnv.louckSi cam 01/05/16 PUD Submittal 03104/16 Revised PUD Submittal License Na. 41352 Data Loucks Project No. 15631 Project Lead VJV Drawn By WBS Checked By VJV Review Date 3/04/16 CO -1 COVER SHEET C1 -1 EXISTING CONDITIONS C1 -2 DEMOLITION PLAN C2 -1 SITE PLAN C3 -1 GRADING PLAN C3- 2 - C3-4 SWPP PLAN C4 -1 UTILITY PLAN CB -1 - C8 -2 CIVIL DETAILS L1 -1 LANDSCAPE PLAN L1 -2 LANDSCAPE DETAILS L2 -1 TREE PRESERVATION PLAN P1 -1 PHOTOMETRIC PLAN P1 -2 PHOTOMETRIC CUT- SHEETS PROTECT EXISTING TREE. i N yTK PLANT SCHEDULE GENERAL NOTES DECIDUOUS TREES QTY COMMONNAME BOTANICAL NAME CONT SIZE SIZE AE 5 ACCOLADE ELM Ulmus'Morton B &B 2.5 °Ca1 LAYOUT. BO 1 BURR OAK Quer ocarpe B&B 2.5 -Ca1 DEMOLITION PLAN RB 5 RIVER BIRCH CLUMP Betula oigrau B&B 8' HGT SKIT 3 SKYLINE HONEYLOCUST Gledits'a triacanthos'Skycole B &B 2.5 °Cal LANDSCAPE DETAILS QB 6 SWAMP WHITE OAK Quercus bicolor B&B 2.5 °Cal EXISTING ELEMENTS BASED UPON INFORMATION SUPPLIED TO WB 4 WHITESPIRE BIRCH CLUMP Betula popul'fol'a'Whitespire Sr: B&B 8' HGT THE ALIGNMENT AND GRADES OF THE PROPOSED WALKS, TRAILS AND /OR ROADWAYS ARE SUBJECT TO FIELD ADJUSTMENT REQUIRED TO CONFORM TO LOCALIZED TOPOGRAPHIC CONDITIONS AND TO EVERGREEN TREES I QTY COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME CONT SIZE SIZE BS 10 BLACK HILLS SPRUCE FULL FORM Picea glauca'Deosata B & B 6' HGT �--� THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CALLING FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. THEY SHALL COOPERATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES IN 0 30 60 NWNTAINING THEIR SERVICE AND/ OR RELOCATION OF LINES. GROUND COVERS CODE COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES, VALVES OR OTHER BURIED STRUCTURES BEFORE SCALE IN FEET ,IN'l,r`' NS NAT SEED SOD TURFSOD TREE REPLACEMENT REQUIREMENTS: TOTAL TREES REQUIRED = 34 TOTAL TREES PROVIDED = 34 REFER TO TREE PRESERVATION PLAN FOR TREE REPLACEMENT CALCULATIONS. i■ LOUCKS PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL 7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 �nnv.loucks nc.cam CADD QUALIFICATION SUBM ITTAUREVISIONS Iw. z y mzt pz,.d trr me �, GENERAL NOTES . d,.y u�med CONTRACTOR SHALL VISIT SITE PRIOR TO SUBMITTING BID. HE SHALL License No. INSPECT SITE AND BECOME FAMILIAR WITH EXISTING CONDITIONS Date RELATING TO THE NATURE AND SCOPE OF WORK. Loucks Project No. 15631 VERIFY LAYOUT AND ANY DIMENSIONS SHOWN AND BRING TO THE VJV ATTENTION OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT ANY DISCREPANCIES WHICH WBS MAY COMPROMISE THE DESIGN AND /OR INTENT OF THE PROJECT'S VJV LAYOUT. 3/04/16 ASSURE COMPLIANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND REGULATIONS COVER SHEET GOVERNING THE WORK OR MATERIALS SUPPLIED. EXISTING CONDITIONS CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL EXISTING ROADS, CURBS /GUTTERS, DEMOLITION PLAN TRAILS, TREES, LAWNS AND SITE ELEMENTS DURING PLANTING SITE PLAN OPERATIONS. ANYDAMAGE TO SAME SHALL BE REPAIRED AT NO COST GRADING PLAN TO THE OW NER. SWPP PLAN CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALIGNMENT AND LOCATION OF ALL UTILITY PLAN UNDERGROUND AND ABOVE GRADE UTILITIES AND PROVIDE THE CIVIL DETAILS NECESSARY PROTECTION FOR SAME BEFORE CONSTRUCTION / MATERIAL LANDSCAPE PLAN INSTALLATION BEGINS (MINIMUM TO'- O' CLEARANCE). LANDSCAPE DETAILS ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHALL BE LAID SO THAT TRENCHES DO PRESERVATION PLAN NOT CUT THROUGH ROOT SYSTEMS OF ANY EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN. PHOTOMETRIC PLAN EXISTING CONTOURS, TRAILS, VEGETATION, CURB /GUTTER AND OTHER CUT - SHEETS EXISTING ELEMENTS BASED UPON INFORMATION SUPPLIED TO LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT BY OTHERS. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ANY AND ALL DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AND NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF SAME. THE ALIGNMENT AND GRADES OF THE PROPOSED WALKS, TRAILS AND /OR ROADWAYS ARE SUBJECT TO FIELD ADJUSTMENT REQUIRED TO CONFORM TO LOCALIZED TOPOGRAPHIC CONDITIONS AND TO MINIMIZE TREE REMOVAL AND GRADING. ANY CHANGE IN ALIGNMENT MUST BE APPROVED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. CALL BEFORE YOU DIGI Gopher State One Call f�EIIy TWIN CITY AREA: 651- 454 -0002 HIV TOLL FREE: 1- 800- 252 -1166 WARNING: �--� THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CALLING FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. THEY SHALL COOPERATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES IN 0 30 60 NWNTAINING THEIR SERVICE AND/ OR RELOCATION OF LINES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 111 -0002 AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE FOR THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND WIRES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES, VALVES OR OTHER BURIED STRUCTURES BEFORE SCALE IN FEET DIGGING, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED _ DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. i■ LOUCKS PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL 7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 �nnv.loucks nc.cam CADD QUALIFICATION SUBM ITTAUREVISIONS Iw. z y mzt pz,.d trr me �, 6'sd •.zP�rvro�o „ea�•t raz a..1 . d,.y u�med d 1 r hzi us •�-, ` License No. via; i. vas rkv- PE 41352 Date Loucks Project No. 15631 Project Lead VJV Dravm By WBS Checked By VJV Review Date 3/04/16 03-1 COVER SHEET C1 -1 EXISTING CONDITIONS C1-2 DEMOLITION PLAN C2 -1 SITE PLAN C3 -1 GRADING PLAN C3- 2 -C3 -4 SWPP PLAN C4 -1 UTILITY PLAN C8 -1 - C8 -2 CIVIL DETAILS 11 -1 LANDSCAPE PLAN L1 -2 LANDSCAPE DETAILS L2 -1 TREE PRESERVATION PLAN P1 -1 PHOTOMETRIC PLAN P1 -2 PHOTOMETRIC CUT - SHEETS TREE PROTECTION NOTE: INSTALL SNOW FENCE AROUND EACH TREE TO T PROTECTED PRIOR TO GRADING. FENCE SHALL BEOTCTEAT THE DRIP EDGE OR CRITICAL TREES BEING / ZONES CTE SHALL TREES . FENCING SHALL BE NO CLOSER THAN 6' THE TRUNK OF ANY TREE TO BE PROTEC TED. THE PERIMETERS FOR TREES BONG - PROTECTEDSHALL BE DESIGNATED AT ALL TIMES DMING CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY AND SIGNAGE SHALL BE INSTALLED AT ALL TREE PROTECTION i AREAS THAT INSTRUCTS IVORKERS TO STAY OUT. CONTRACTOR SHALL AVOAALL AREAS WITHIN TREE PROTECTION FENCE. SOIL SHOULD BE PROTECTED FROM EROSR)N AND CHANGES IN CHEMISTRY FROM CONCRETE OR TOXIC MATERIALS SUCH AS FUELS AND PAINTS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE `TREE PAINT" ON SITE AT ALL TIMES. IF AN OAK 15 WOUNDED DURING CONSTRUCRON, THE CONTRACTOR MUST XWEDIATELY APPLY PAINT TOTHE WOUND IN ORDER TO PREVENT OAK WJ. ALL DAMAGETO TREES TO BE PROTECTED SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE / •p' — eo ALL TREES OFF PROPERTY ARE TO REMAIN �',77j k. T av w � i / D i / 4 IyAj a/ ol i a / i \ TX V r1i'l TREE PROTECTION L2 -1 Ml*l 1%2' =P -0^ T,,, -F,, r „,o:eG / / // POINT NUMBER SIZE (CALIN.) SPECIES ^ 5068 14 ASPEN EXEMPT / / // POINT NUMBER SIZE (CALIN.) SPECIES STATUS 5068 14 ASPEN EXEMPT 5069 8 BOXELDER EXEMPT 5071 16 BOXELDER EXEMPT 5107 14 MAPLE REMOVED 5109 12 BO XELDER EXEMPT 5110 8 BOXELDER EXEMPT 5112 8 BOXELDER EXEMPT 5167 8 BOXELDER EXEMPT 5168 10 BOXELDER EXEMPT 5169 12 BOXELDER EXEMPT 5170 8 BOXELDER EXEMPT 5171 8 MAPLE REMOVED 5172 24 OAK REMOVED 5173 16 OAK REMOVED 5174 16 OAK REMOVED 5175 12 OAK pEMOVED 5176 36 MAPLE REMOVED 5177 12 OAK REMOVED 5179 24 COTTONWOOD EXEMPT 5180 16 MAPLE REMOVED 5181 28 COTTONWOOD EXEMPT 5182 14 OAK REMOVED 5183 14 OAK REMOVED 5184 28 COTTONWOOD EXEMPT 5185 24 COTTONWOOD EXEMPT 5186 24 COTTONWOOD EXEMPT 5187 16 BOXELDER EXEMPT 5188 12 BOXELDER EXEMPT 5189 24 OAK REMOVED 5280 8 ASPEN EXEMPT 5282 18 OAK REMOVED 5283 10 SPRUCE FOR REMOVED 5310 30 REMOVED 5334 12 BOXELDER EXEMPT 5335 8 BOXELDER EXEMPT 5336 8 BOXELDER EXEMPT 5341 8 MAPLE REMOVED 5358 18 MAPLE REMOVED 5359 16 SPRUCE REMOVED 5360 20 SPRUCE REMOVED 5362 10 FRUIT REMOVED 5364 26 SPRUCE REMOVED 5366 24 SPRUCE REMOVED 5367 18 SPRUCE REMOVED 5368 16 SPRUCE REMOVED 5389 12 SPRUCE REMOVED 5390 8 FRUIT REMOVED 5399 8 CEDAR REMOVED 5400 8 SPRUCE REMOVED 5401 18 PINE REMOVED 5402 16 PINE REMOVED 5404 8 MAPLE REMOVED 5405 10 MAPLE REMOVED 5406 12 OAK REMOVED 5408 36 OAK REMOVED 5410 28 OAK REMOVED 5411 30 OAK REMOVED 5412 8 BOXELDER EXEMPT 5413 8 BOXELDER EXEMPT 5458 8 BOXELDER EXEMPT 5459 8 PINE REMOVED 5460 8 BOXELDER EXEMPT 5461 10 BO XELDER EXEMPT 5462 14 PINE REMOVED 5463 12 BOXELDER OX DER EXEMPT 5464 8 BOXELDER EXEMPT 5465 12 BOXELDER EXEMPT 5475 20 MAPLE REMOVED 5488 22 COTTONWOOD EXEMPT 5489 12 BOXELDER EXEMPT 5490 12 MAPLE REMOVED 5491 10 BOXELDER EXEMPT 5492 10 MAPLE REMOVED 5493 12 MAPLE REMOVED 5494 16 MAPLE REMOVED 5499 24 COTTONWOOD EXEMPT 5500 18 COTTONWOOD EXEMPT 5501 12 BOXELDER EXEMPT 5502 12 BOXELDER EXEMPT 5503 10 BOXELDER EXEMPT 5504 30 BOXELDER EXEMPT 5507 16 MAPLE REMOVED 5508 14 MAPLE REMOVED POINT NUMBER SIZE (CAL IN.) SPECIES STATUS 5509 12 BOXELDER EXEMPT 5510 18 BOXELDER EXEMPT 5511 12 BOXELDER EXEMPT 5517 22 ASPEN EXEMPT 5518 16 BOXELDER EXEMPT 5519 14 ASPEN EXEMPT 5521 16 ASPEN EXEMPT 5522 14 ASPEN EXEMPT 5523 8 ASPEN EXEMPT 5525 14 ASPEN EXEMPT 5526 10 ASPEN EXEMPT 5527 8 ASPEN EXEMPT 5528 14 ASPEN EXEMPT 5533 12 ASPEN EXEMPT 5534 12 ASPEN EXEMPT 5535 30 BO %ELDER EXEMPT 5536 8 BOXELDER EXEMPT 5537 10 BOXELDER EXEMPT 5538 30 BOXELDER EXEMPT 5544 18 BOXELDER EXEMPT 5545 8 BOXELDER EXEMPT 5550 8 BOXELDER EXEMPT 5551 8 BOXELDER EXEMPT 5552 8 BOXELDER EXEMPT 5553 8 BOXELDER EXEMPT 5554 8 BOXELDER EXEMPT 5555 18 ASPEN EXEMPT 5556 12 BOXELDER EXEMPT 5557 18 ASPEN EXEMPT 5559 14 ASPEN EXEMPT 5560 10 ASPEN EXEMPT 5564 14 ASPEN EXEMPT 10041 28 MAPLE REMOVED 10050 28 MAPLE REMOVED 10053 18 COTTONWOOD EXEMPT 10054 18 COTTONWOOD EXEMPT 10055 12 COTTONWOOD EXEMPT 10056 24 COTTONWOOD EXEMPT 10057 12 COTTONWOOD EXEMPT 10058 8 COTTONWOOD EXEMPT 10059 12 MAPLE REMOVED 10060 24 COTTONWOOD EXEMPT 10061 24 COTTONWOOD EXEMPT 10197 15 COTTONWOOD EXEMPT 10198 10 COTTONWOOD EXEMPT 10199 10 COTTONWOOD EXEMPT 10200 SS COTTONWOOD EXEMPT 10201 1 18 COTTONWOOD EXEMPT 10202 12 COTTONWOOD EXEMPT 10203 15 COTTONWOOD EXEMPT 10204 10 COTTONWOOD EXEMPT 10205 10 COTTONWOOD EXE MPT 10206 15 COTTONWOOD EXEMPT 10207 10 COTTONWOOD EXEMPT 10208 30 COTTONWOOD EXEMPT 10209 8 COTTONWOOD EXEMPT 10210 8 COTTONWOOD EXEMPT 10211 18 COTTONWOOD EXEMPT 10212 18 COTTONWOOD EXEMPT 10213 15 COTTONWOOD EXEMPT 10214 8 COTTONWOOD EXEMPT 10215 12 COTTONWOOD EXEMPT 10216 10 COTTONWOOD EXEMPT 10217 12 COTTONWOOD EXEMPT 10218 12 COTTONWOOD EXEMPT 10220 8 COTTONWOOD EXEMPT 10221 12 COTTONWOOD EXEMPT 10222 18 COTTONWOOD EXEMPT 10225 15 COTTONWOOD EXEMPT 10226 15 COTTONWOOD EXEMPT 10239 10 MAPLE REMOVED 10307 24 SPRUCE REMOVED 10308 15 SPRUCE REMOVED 10309 20 SPRUCE REMOVED 30316 12 MAPLE REMOVED 10317 10 MALE REMOVED 10318 10 MAPLE REMOVED 10319 10 MAPLE REMOVED 10320 15 BOXELDER EXEMPT 10323 12 MAPLE REMOVED 10324 15 MAPLE REMOVED 10325 15 MAPLE REMOVED 10331 15 MAPLE REMOVED 10373 10 BOXELDER EXEMPT / COVER SHEET TREE REPLACEMENT CALCULATIONS: EXISTING CONDITIONS C1 -2 SIGNIFICANT DECIDUOUS TREES OVER 8" DBH SHALL BE REPLACED WITH 2 TREES. C2 -1 SITE PLAN TREES REMOVED:15 TREES REQUIRED:30 GRADING PLAN C3- 2 -C3 -4 SWPP PLAN SIGNIFICANT DECIDUOUS TREES OVER 12" DBH SHALL BE REPLACED WITH 3 TREES. TREES REMOVED:28 TREES REQUIRED:84 UTILITY PLAN C8 -1 -C8 SIGNIFICANT CONIFEROUS TREES OVER 6' HEIGHT SHALL BE REPLACED WITH 1 TREE. L1 -1 LANDSCAPE PLAN TREES REMOVED:O TREES REQUIRED:O LANDSCAPE DETAILS L2 -1 SIGNIFICANT CONIFEROUS TREES OVER 12' HEIGHT SHALL BE REPLACED WITH 2 TREES. TI PHOTOMETRIC PLAN TREES REMOVEDJ7 TREES REQUIRED:34 o/ s' TOTAL TREES REQUIRED PER CALCULATIONS: 148 0 30 80 THE TREE PRESERVATION AND REPLACEMENT POLICY STATES THAT "IN NO CASE WILL THE TOTAL NUMBER OF REPLACEMENT TREES EXCEED EIGHT TREES PER ACRE ". 1 / SITE AREA = 4.24 ACRES j TOTAL TREES REQUIRED = 34 SCALE IN FEET / REFER TO LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR LOCATION OF PROPOSED TREES. mrA LOUCKS PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL 7200 Hemlock Lane, Su to 300 Maple Cu.-, MN 55369 763.424.5505 tnm.loucks'nc com 01/05/16 PUD Submittal 03/04/16 Revised PUD Submittal License No 52050 Date Laucks Project No. 15631 Project Lead VJV D—u By TJF Checked By N Rev er✓ Date 03/04/15 CO -1 COVER SHEET C1 1 EXISTING CONDITIONS C1 -2 DEMOLITION PLAN C2 -1 SITE PLAN C3 -1 GRADING PLAN C3- 2 -C3 -4 SWPP PLAN C4 -1 UTILITY PLAN C8 -1 -C8 -2 CIVIL DETAILS L1 -1 LANDSCAPE PLAN L1 -2 LANDSCAPE DETAILS L2 -1 TREE PRESERVATION PLAN P1 -1 PHOTOMETRIC PLAN P1 -2 PHOTOMETRIC CUT- SHEETS UNIT MIX Oppidan Shorewood Senior Living General Concept Stage: (5) &(6) Development Stage: (2) &(3) Building occupancy: 1-1 Assisted Living /Memory Care Apartments) Independent Living/ Assisted Living Unit Type GSF 1st Floor 12nd Floor 3rd Floor TOTAL TOTAL S.F. A Studio 576 0 1 1 2 1,152 B1 1 Bedroom 681 0 6 6 12 8,172 B2 1 Bedroom 704 0 5 5 10 7,040 C 1 Bedroom 734 1 1 0 2 1,468 D 1Bedroom 815 4 8 8 20 16,300 D2 1 Bedroom 897 2 2 4 3,588 E 1 Bedroom & Den 909 0 1 1 2 1,818 E2 1 Bedroom & Den 934 0 4 4 8 1 7,472 F 1 Bedroom & Den 834 0 1 1 2 1,668 F2 1 Bedroom & Den 1 871 4 4 4 12 10,452 G 2 Bedroom 1,029 1 1 0 2 2,058 H 2Bedroom 1,296 0 2 2 4 5,184 TOTAL: 1 10 36 34 80 66,372 Memory Care Unit Type GSF 1st Floor 2nd Floor 3rd Floor TOTAL TOTALS.F. MC -3 Studio 440 25 0 0 25 11,000 TO�TyA��L 25 0 0 25 11,000 ,4 mom 0 x014 4.. f u 35, 77 ,, rr. »11371 Building S.F. Const. Use Parking 1st Floor 2nd Floor 3rd Floor TOTAL S.F. Parking(42) /Support 20,114 0 0 0 20,114 Unit S.F. perfloor Area Devoted to Residential Use 1 -1 Occupancy) 0 19,806 29,834 28,069 77,709 Public Space per floor, including circulation (I.1 Occupancy) 20,143 9,101 8,978 38,222 ,' 2biig, 5U ,� ., Area Summary TOTAL S.F. Total Parcel Area 184,803 Road Easement Area 20,750 Area Dedicated to Building Footprint 39,949 Area Oedicated to Par in Loading and Access 45,108 ,'r%v,✓F r.,, r,_ 1r}' ,A,rrra.ar�.�.,.,.c- `,n`r,.hr.. ,,, ,;. r f :. f ., fr., ..,,r ,.,: , . ..� f` t,.'�m:. -._ % of Project Area per Land Area s.r. 5.f. Building: 136,045 Site: 184,803 74% Building Height Summary The roof height of the building is 35' (three stories, plus underground parking) with aesthetic /architectural articulation extending 18" above the main roof to add visual Interest. In order to accommodate the underground parking/ the grade slopes down at the north side of the site, which Increases the the visible building height In that area only. FIRST FLOOR 1116" = 1' -0'r q TRUE PROJECT NORTH NORTH II 3 3 1- f I d 'I it I! ) 1295 BANDANA BLVD N, SURE 200 ST. PAUL, MN 55108 -2735 (651) 642 -9200 1 FAX(651)642 -1101 - .popearch.com OPPIDAN SHOREWOOD SENIOR LIVING SHOREWOOD,MN PUD APPLICATION - GENERAL CONCEPT STAGE AND DEVELOPMENT STAGE REVISION: 3/4/2016 FIRST LEVEL FLOOR PLAN - 56632 -15234 AL CS SHEET A -2 SECOND FLOOR PLAN 1/16" = V-0" TRUE PROJECT NORTH NORTH I; l 1295 BANDANA BLVD N, SURE Si. PAUL, MN 55108-2735 (651) -9- 1 FM(651)6 2 -1101 -pe-h-- OPPIDAN SHOREWOOD SENIOR LIVING SHOREWOOD, MN PUD APPLICATION - GENERAL CONCEPT STAGE AND DEVELOPMENT STAGE REVISION: 3/4/2016 SECOND LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 56632-15234 AL. LB Cs SHEET A-3 THIRD FLOOR PLAN 1/16" = 1'-0" TRUE PROJECT NORTH NORTH is 1295 BANDANA BLVD N, SURE 200 S . PAUL, MN 55108-2735 (651) 642-9200 1 FAX (—) — 101 —.p.pe ... h.,.. PUD APPLICATION - GENERAL CONCEPT STAGE AND DEVELOPMENT STAGE REVISION: 3/4/2016 THIRD LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 56632-15234 AL, LB Cs SHEET A-4 N m �D c)2 L/) u m It r W 1-� N 4D, N W W N N W N H �O ii 2 � om =r m 3gZ s =ms D~ 00 03 A mD .r 03 z sm o PTA O rm P O D P O �z H NS O � DA �D 2 Op Z A Om Om �j3 Om A2 A� Ny a m � °y a '9 O O m N O_ O 2 O �S Hp o� zz mx p2 Km O O mf � 33 m D n O z K a z O �n SIX A y W Q A O H O 2 O �H Ul 2 O DA v� z m x �x DA mD 2� O y A N N V) Cq O C u r N o m r m iD O Z n 3 O � Ri m ('' = O_ OT m C O °' o O 0 Vf D G1 D 0Z1 " w r^r> O (A en < W Z m —DI C ZD 0 r §§ �a W z SF 00 sl Cn r"m a =002 > N lV �o �c II =N - m D = N m r m D O z W 1� N D N ~ IN N ® N 0' W N N II � ICM C) n 3 O F i ° R1 O A C � N O (� . O rn O 0 N D 03 O .T� A WO • 1.41 cn ILA// D A om x m O i■ �■ �■ L*49 E MW M T wm�D Y wtT OCA $ • ACS N Z G1 G DA �D m r 2� ' CO a °D z o "s p a Op 2 m D ® fT1 CCOC 2 � 8 O O ° ■N ■� mm lZ 1� �ZOD swm o cn ■MM ■MO a. a� ilk T.� V O� n 3 O F i ° R1 O A C � N O (� . O rn O 0 N D 03 O .T� A WO 1.41 cn ILA// D A om x m O i■ �■ �■ L*49 E MW M T wm�D Y wtT OCA $ • ACS N Z G1 G DA �D m r 2� ' CO a °D z o "s p a Op 2 m D ® fT1 CCOC 2 � 8 O O ° ■N ■� n 3 O F i ° R1 O A C � N O (� . O rn O 0 N D 03 O .T� A WO 1.41 cn ILA// D A O O wm�D Y wtT OCA $ • ACS N Z G1 G DA �D m r 2� ' CO a °D z o "s p a Op 2 m D ® fT1 CCOC 2 � 8 O O ° n 3 O F i ° R1 O A C � N O (� . O rn O 0 N D 1.41 cn ILA// ARI O Z v wm�D Y wtT OCA $ • W m r 0 i -a z ' CO a °D z o "s p a m D Cl °'zoo CC c C c D a0 ® 3 O�m�Z< O ° mm lZ 1� �ZOD swm o cn Z f,) 0 Z 3 N 8 W N N � o D ~' D o r m r m D V i 4 > m O z D m WT->- a D u � � D o r = m r m D O z D D r v w p" V 00 D o 'r ='m r m 'D O Z D m Z om AH mb yS z� v Op m3m Z y G r m Z O A C 3 Z n 0 A sM om 5a sZ mS A2 Dm O p 3 ; D D D n n 9 8 z Gt � p v y� N S p O m O m M Iz em z A UI DS O A n 0 z G) n O D m C/) ni X N m o Ri O O 10 1 y nm nm 03 03 nm 03 nA 0. pm 03 Am A� Am OZ_ A A2 -1 mZ <m ND cs ND mO D m1�l1 3y h N ti N D o K 0 G=7 O (Z m O m M Iz em z A UI DS O A n 0 z G) n O D m C/) ni X N m o Ri O O 10 1 y D G7 m MZ o m m o cn Z m C tTJ �� a 0� N W wm�D o °Z�� mz= s�> m zM� Q � O r m W � � O m� mp ; o ate == 0 m < n < O _ m o < Tm 0 Z 27- G) 3 °�$ D m D r m T ,O 10 I� 'm D cn r I - ALI--- A D m z D r m T 0 Ln O c m RECEIVED MAR 04 2016 CITY OF SHOREWOOD zm n m , 0 m � o W o m n> r - - — O _ cn bz o > ° °W � m • s�o _ Z > O > < V Z --m N m 0 0 G) Z Lf) m m ���y �Z00D zN�m o �; /" wsB Building a legacy — your legacy. March 7, 2016 Mr. Brad Nielsen, Planning Director City of Shorewood 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, MN 55331 Re: Oppidan — Shorewood Senior Living Facility Preliminary Plan Review City Project No. 16 -05 WSB Project No. 02925 -15 Dear Mr. Nielsen: 477 Temperance Street St. Paul, MN 55101 Tel: 651- 286 -8450 Fax: 651- 286 -8488 We have reviewed the development stage plan submittal that includes the site plan, grading plan, utility plan, storm water management plan, and landscape plans for the Oppidan —Shorewood Senior Living Development. Plans are prepared by Loucks, dated January 5, 2016. We have the following comments and recommendations for the preliminary plan review. General 1. Prior to the start of any construction, permits will need to be obtained at a minimum from the following agencies: a. MPCA Construction General Permit b. Minnehaha Creek Watershed District c. MNDOT (work in ROW/ regarding stormwater and minor grading) d. Minnesota Department of Health A maintenance plan will be required to ensure that the stormwater treatment facilities will be maintained long term. The conditional language must, at a minimum, include the following: a. Annual inspection b. Maintenance of all erosion control measures including, but not limited to: rip rap, storm sewer outlets, catch basin inlets, etc. c. Verification of system drawdowns with 48 hours for infiltration areas. d. Removal of trash and debris. Erosion and Sediment Control 1. The SWPPP shall provide the estimated quantities for all proposed erosion control measures. The quantities shall be sufficient to provide temporary erosion control throughout construction to meet the stabilization timeframes of the MPCA construction general permit. 2. Details shall be provided on the plans for the type of inlet protection that will be used for all phases of construction, including existing streets adjacent to the project where tracking may occur. 3. All pond side slopes and slopes 3:1 or greater are to be stabilized using erosion control blanket. Equal Opportunity Employer wsbeng.com K: \02925- 150 \Admit Attachment IV Mr. Brad Nielsen March 7, 2016 Page 2 Grading Plan 1. Design certification for retaining wall systems will be required. Material types are to be identified with the construction plans. Walls supporting traffic loading, and constructed as single height or tiered height greater than 4 feet will need to be designed by a licensed professional in Minnesota. Walls supporting traffic loading will need to be designed by a licensed professional in Minnesota. 2. Planning and Zoning requirements may prohibit single retaining walls greater than 6 feet in height without screening or tiers. 3. Provide dimensions from the property line to retaining wall face on the grading and site plans. 4. The proposed stormwater pond HWL and NWL elevations need to be shown on the Grading Plan. 5. The culverts crossing the proposed access drives to the facility will need to be sized for the tributary areas draining to the site, and supported with storm water calculations. 6. The south access is to be modified to end the curb at the property line to reduce erosion potential along Chaska Road. 7. The south - center access is to be modified to create a low point at the storm drains and end the curb approximately 5 feet past the storm drains, toward Chaska Road. 8. The north- center driveway storm drains need to be located within the parcel, and supplemental storm drains may be needed to retain the run -off on -site. The curb is to be removed from the plan approximately 5 feet beyond the storm drains, towards Chaska Road. 9. The north access curb is to be removed in the right of way from the mid radius of each curb line 10. The grade adjacent to TH 7 rises from the right of way line to the building ground floor or top of retaining walls from about 10 feet to 18 feet. This height varies along the length of the building. 11. Show the pond HWL, NWL and pond emergency overflow spot elevation(s) on the grading plan. 12. The Excelsior Fire District commented on the need for a paved surface along the building. This may change the retaining wall configuration and wall height from the drawings submitted to date. 13. Additional comments on the grading plan may be forthcoming in future plan submittals. Streets, Sidewalks, and Trails 1. Pedestrian ramps will need to meet current ADA requirements. The City details and MnDOT Standard Plans are to be used for construction plans and the ramp layout will need to avoid conflict with storm drains. 8:102925- 150WdmInlDw \LTR PTH- BNielsen -030416- Pretimpl,nreriew- Subnilml l_PTHdwz Mr. Brad Nielsen March 7, 2016 Page 3 Additional detailed design comments and recommendations will be reserved for future plan submittals. Storm Water Management 1. The stormwater management plan indicates that volume control is not necessary due to being exempt by the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District; however this site should be classified as redevelopment and not new development, therefore triggering the redevelopment standard of their rule. This will require that their phosphorus control, rate control, and volume control standards be met. The City of Shorewood's Comprehensive Water Resources Management plan, as adopted by ordinance, requires the abstraction via infiltration, evapotranspiration, capture, and /or reuse of one inch of rainfall from the site. The applicant will need to demonstrate compliance with this requirement. Where site soils do not allow infiltration flexibility may be given, but at a minimum the applicant will need to demonstrate through modeling that the phosphorus loads are not increasing when comparing existing and proposed conditions. 3. The City of Shorewood's Comprehensive Water Resources Management plan, as adopted by ordinance, requires design calculations demonstrating that for the 1 %, 10 %, and 99% chance storm events that the runoff rates do not increase from pre - development conditions. The applicant has not provided modeling demonstrating compliance with this requirement. 4. The City of Shorewood's Comprehensive Water Resources Management plan, as adopted by ordinance, requires treatment to NURP standards prior to storm water discharges to a lake, stream, or wetland and prior to discharge from the site. 5. The City of Shorewood's Comprehensive Water Resources Management plan, as adopted by ordinance, requires that the minimum building elevation shall be at least 3 feet above the project 100 -year water elevation. The facility's lower GFE is 956.0. The Surface Water Plan does provide priorities for the lowest floor elevation freeboard to adjacent storm water facilities. A copy is enclosed for your reference. 6. Additional detailed information will need to be provided for the underground stormwater storage chambers. 7. Curb cuts for drainage discharge will be required to have spillways with geotextile fabric liner to reduce erosion potential. 8. Additional comments on the stormwater improvements will be forthcoming in future plan submittals. Sanitary Sewer and Watermain 1. There are two sanitary sewer lines in Chaska Road, one owned by the City and the other owned by the MCES. The proposed site sewer connection is to the MCES system and the connection permit will need to be coordinated with the MCES. The applicant should be aware that the sewer system downstream of the connection may need to be reconstructed to a larger diameter sewer. K:\02 92 5- 15 0Wdmin\Do,s\LTR PTH- BNielsen -030-016 -&elim plan rm%iew- SuLmittnl 1_PITLdx Mr. Brad Nielsen March 7, 2016 Page 4 2. The City water system will need to be extended to the site from the north side of TH 7. An easement across the parcel from TH 7 to Chaska Road will be necessary. The sanitary sewer and watermain will be reviewed in detail with the construction plan submittals. Work within the City right of way will need to be prepared with the City's updated 2016 standard specifications and detail plates. Please contact me if you have any questions or need any additional information from engineering staff. Sincerely, WSB & Associates, Inc. Paul Hornby, P.E. City Engineer (651) 286 -8453 Phornbv @wsbeng.com ph K: 02925- 150Wdmin\D— \LTR_PTH -BM,Il n 030416 -Pmlim plan—i-- SubmittalI_M.d- P'P P: c� h 49 4 5 -D-R-A-F-T- CITY OF SHOREWOOD RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION GRANTING CONCEPT AND DEVELOPMENT STAGE PLAN APPROVAL FOR THE SHOREWOOD SENIOR LIVING (OPPIDAN) P.U.D. WHEREAS, Oppidan (Applicant) has an interest in certain lands within the City of Shorewood and has applied to the Council for Concept and Development Stage Plan approval of a residential Planned Unit Development (P.U.D.) to be known as Shorewood Senior Living; and WHEREAS, the Applicant's request has been reviewed by the City Planner and his recommendations have been duly set forth in a memorandum to the Planning Commission, dated 7 March 2016, which memorandum is on file at City Hall; and WHEREAS, the Applicant's request has been reviewed by the City Engineer and his recommendations have been duly set forth in a letter to the Planning Director, dated 7 March 2016, which letter is on file at City Hall; and WHEREAS, a Public Hearing was held by the Shorewood Planning Commission on 15 March 2016, for which notice was duly published and all adjacent property owners duly notified. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Shorewood as follows: 1. The Applicant's request for Concept and Development Stage Plan approvals of the Shorewood Senior Living P.U.D. is hereby approved. 2. That such approvals are subject to the recommendations set forth in the City Planner's memorandum, dated 7 March 2016; and the City Engineer's letter, dated 7 March 2016 both as approved by the Planning Commission at its 15 March 2016 meeting, the minutes of which are on file at City Hall. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD this 28th day of March 2016. Scott Zerby, Mayor ATTEST: Jean Panchyshyn, City Clerk To The City of Shorewood City Council Concerning the property at 6020, 6050 and 23075 Hwy 7, Shorewood development. We live at 6015 Chaska Road. Directly across from this development. After attending the Planning Commission meeting on March 15th we would like to request that you review our letter to the Planning Commission the Planning Commission meeting minutes and also address some other concerns that have come up since the meeting. One of our major concerns is the speed and amount of traffic on Chaska Road. The Planning Commission heard of a number of ways to control the traffic. Enforcement of the speed limit was discussed and we feel this is a good start, but in the past this has been a temporary solution. Soon after the enforcement leaves or is reduced the speed increases again. Other options included redesigning or closing the Hwy 7 left turn lane thus redirecting the traffic to the major road of Hwy 41. Another suggestion was to make Chaska Road a one way from Hwy 41 north to Hwy 7. This past week I counted 180-190 vehicles going south from Highway 7 on two evenings each hour between 5pm and 6pm. All of this traffic on a road with only eight homes between Highway 7 and Mayflower Road. While all of these ideas have merit, I suggest closing Chaska Road at Mayflower and making a Cul de Sac at Mayflower. This idea was met with concerns about fire and safety issues on the road. I would like to point out that the traffic problem is the same one the residents of Christmas Lake Road were having when Chanhassen started developing a few years ago. Christmas Lake Road (a Shorewood road) was getting a large amount of traffic from Hwy 7 to Mill Street so that traffic would not have to go through Excelsior to Mill Street. The solution was to close the intersection at Christmas Lake Road and Mill Street. Again the safety concerns were brought up and a barrier was designed to allow emergency access, if needed, and also close the intersection. This same solution could work for Chaska Road. Another issue we would like to address is the lighting plan for the new development. There are currently no street lights on Chaska Road, even at Hwy 7. This is a nice dark neighborhood without much light pollution. The new building would have lighting on 24 hours a day. While we understand the need for safety at the facility we are concerned about the amount of light throughout the night. I would encourage each council member to drive down Chaska Road at night to see for yourself what our neighborhood looks like before allowing lighting to be on all night long. I would invite you to stop in my driveway and look across Highway 7 at Our Savior Lutheran Church. The church lot only has 4 parking lot light poles and the rest is building lighting. The new complex will have a least twenty light poles and building lighting. Imagine this amount of light at the new site on our dark road. Which we prefer to keep dark. Better yet, consider this amount of light at the end of your own property all night long. Shorewood has long been a city of small groups of neighbors. This brings the question, "does this facility belong in a neighborhood?" You are proposing a for profit enterprise to alter a long standing neighborhood in this fine city. Where does this stop on our neighborhood road? What is to stop further building of the same type on the next properties? Thank you for your service to our city, Mike and Cindy Marr 6015 Chaska Road Shorewood, Mn. 55331 � #so MEETING TYPE City of Shorewood Council Meeting Item Regular Meeting .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Title/Subject: Minnetonka Country Club—Early Grading Agreement Meeting Date: 28 March 2016 Prepared by: Brad Nielsen Reviewed by: Patti Helgesen Attachments: Draft Agreement Draft Resolution Policy Consideration: Should the City enter into an agreement authorizing Mattamy Homes to begin work on the grading and underground utilities prior to approval of the final plat for the project? Background: Mattamy Homes has requested a grading permit that would allow them to begin earthwork on MCC project in advance of having a final plat approved. Working with the City Attorney, we have prepared an early grading development agreement whereby the developer is required to provide security sufficient to cover site restoration if it fails to obtain final plat approval per the City's subdivision regulations. The agreement is attached for your consideration. Conditions of approval include the developer obtaining "no further action" letters from the Department of Agriculture and the MPCA(which have been done), approval by the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District,which is on their agenda for this evening, and City Engineer's approval. A resolution authorizing staff to enter into the agreement is attached for your consideration. Financial or Budget Considerations: Based on the City Engineer's estimate of restoration costs, the developer will be required to submit a letter of credit for$157,000. Options: Approve the agreement; reject the agreement; or modify conditions of approval. Recommendation/Action Requested: Staff recommends adoption of the attached resolution. Next Steps and Timelines: The developer mobilized its grading equipment in advance of seasonal road restrictions and is awaiting the Council's blessing. Mission Statement: The City of Shorewood is committed to providing residents quality public services, a healthy environment, a variety of attractive amenities, a sustainable tax base, and sound financial management through effective, efficient, and visionary leadership. Page 1 CITY OF SHOREWOOD COUNTY OF HENNEPIN STATE OF MINNESOTA AGREEMENT REGARDING GRADING AND SITE UTILITY WORK OF PHASE ONE MINNETONKA COUNTRY CLUB PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT WHEREAS, the applicant Mattamy Minneapolis, LLC ("Developer"), a limited liability company under the laws of the State of Delaware, owners of the property described as Minnetonka County Club ("MCC"), has applied for and received concept and development stage planned unit development ("PUD") approval of the above described property for the property designated as MCC; and WHEREAS, on 12 October 2015, the Shorewood City Council approved the concept stage PUD subject to conditions; and WHEREAS, on 22 February 2016, the Shorewood City Council approved the development stage and preliminary plat subject to conditions; and WHEREAS, the applicant has requested early grading of specific portions the property within the PUD, and the Council has approved certain work on site subject to the Developer executing this Agreement and providing security in an amount established by the City Engineer. NOW THEREFORE, IT IS AGREED BETWEEN THE PARTIES AS FOLLOWS: 1. Developer will commence limited grading of the site only to the extent approved by the City Engineer and as set forth in the Phase 1 Grading, Development and Erosion Control Plan, dated 16 February 2106, prepared by Carlson and McCain and on file at the Shorewood City Offices. No work will be undertaken until Developer has: A. Submitted and has approved by the City Engineer grading and erosion control plans for the site. B. Secured approvals and permits from the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District ("MCWD") for all areas where grading will not be permitted pending final resolution of wetland issues. 4823-1784-9903.1 C. Secured no further action letters from the Minnesota Department of Agriculture and the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency for the contaminated soil remediation that has taken place on the site. D. Resolved drainage and erosion control issues to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. E. Hours of operation shall be limited as to those contained in the adopted City Engineering Manual. F. Haul routes for vehicles used in transport of materials shall be designated by the City Engineer. The City Engineer has discretion to change the designated haul routes in event of unforeseen circumstances. This Agreement may be terminated and all work on the site may be terminated by the City for applicant's failure to use the designated haul routes. G. Applicant shall provide for daily street sweeping of Smithtown Road, or as deemed necessary by the City Engineer or City Public Works Supervisor. 2. Limitations. Developer will undertake such work with knowledge that not all conditions of final plat approval have been satisfied. All work undertaken prior to satisfaction of all conditions of final plat approval and full compliance with City ordinances including, but not limited to, execution of Developer's Agreement and posting of all required security, is solely at the risk of Developer. 3. Indemnification. Developer shall indemnify and hold harmless the City from any and all claims or causes of action of whatever nature related to the grading and preparation of the site as set forth in this Agreement. Said indemnity and agreement to hold the City harmless includes payment of any and all attorney's fees, engineering fees, witness fees or any other costs and disbursements related to this Agreement, including any City fees or costs expended to enforce the terms and conditions of this Agreement. 4. Financial Security. In order to ensure compliance with this Agreement, or to assure completion or restoration of the site, Developer shall post the following securities: (a) An Irrevocable Standby Letter of Credit with automatic renewal provision or cash in the amount of$157,000 in favor of the City. The Letter of Credit shall remain in place until all work set forth in this Agreement (Phase 1) as set forth on the plans referenced in 1., above has been completed and approved by the City Engineer. Additional Letters of Credit must be in place prior to any work commencing on additional Grading Phases. The Letter of Credit shall be in a form approved by the City, with an FDIC approved Bank within an office at which the Letter of Credit can be drawn within fifty (50) miles of the City. If the Letter of Credit remains in place at the time of execution of a Developer's Agreement, the Letter of Credit, 4823-1784-9903.1 2 or a portion thereof, as determined by the City Engineer, may be extended as security for the Developer's Agreement. (b) The Letter of Credit referenced in (a), above, shall also serve as security for purposes of repair and overlay of City street haul routes (or other roads if improperly used) damaged by vehicles and machinery involved in excavation and transportation of material to and from the subject site. (c) The Letter of Credit referenced in (a), above, shall also serve as security for purposes of reimbursing the City for any street sweeping costs and expenses not timely undertaken by applicant. In the event that applicant does not complete the daily required street sweeping the City public works may undertake the task and shall be reimbursed for their costs and expenses at established City rates. 5. Waiver. The City makes no representations that this Agreement constitutes or implies that conditions of preliminary or final plat approval have been satisfied. Dated: 29 March 2016 CITY OF SHOREWOOD Scott Zerby, Mayor Jean Panchyschyn, City Clerk Dated: 29 March 2016 MATTAMY MINNEAPOLIS, LLC By: Its: 4823-1784-9903.1 3 CITY OF SHOREWOOD RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING CITY ADMINISTRATOR TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT REGARDING GRADING AND SITE UTILITY WORK OF PHASE I MINNETONKA COUNTRY CLUB PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT WHEREAS, Mattamy Homes of Minnesota LLC has requested permission to begin grading, utility and site work for the Minnetonka Country Club P.U.D. in advance of Final Plan and Final Plat approval for the project; and WHEREAS, in order to ensure that disturbed areas of the subject property will be restored in the event the final plat is not secured within the time limits imposed by the Shorewood Subdivision Code; and NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Shorewood City Council hereby approves and authorizes the City Administrator to execute the Agreement Regarding Grading and Site Utility Work of Phase I Minnetonka Country Club P.U.D. on behalf of the City. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Shorewood this 28th day of March 2016. Scott Zerby, Mayor ATTEST: Jean Panchyshyn, City Clerk #11A.1 CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, Minnesota 55331 952-960-7900 Fax: 952-474-0128 www.ci.shorewood.mn.us cityhall@ci.shorewood.mn.us Re: Trail Schedule Update – Galpin Lake Road and Smithtown Road (East) Prepared by Paul Hornby and Brad Nielsen Galpin Lake Road Walkway Schedule – PROJECT IS POSTPONED Planning Commission recommendation to Council re trail segment for following year Council authorizes preparation of survey and Feasibility Report Survey (30 days) – May Feasibility Report (30 days) – June Planning Commission review of feasibility report and trail walk – July Planning Commission recommendation to Council re Feasibility Report Council approves Feasibility Report Planning Commission holds Neighborhood Meeting (Open House) Council award of land acquisition services and authorizes preparation of Plans and Specifications Preparation of Plans and Specifications (90 days) 95% Complete submittal to MnDOT 7/01/14 MnDOT Review Complete 7/31/14 CC Authorization to Advertise for bids 6/23/14 Open Bids 8/19/14 CC consideration of Award 8/25/14 Land Acquisition Process (start approx. mid-way through plans and specs) Land Acquisition process not required due to design modifications o Individual temporary easements or rights of entry may be required o Reduces project schedule o 10/30/14 Neighborhood post-bid meeting N/A City possession of easements/letter of compliance Groundbreaking Ceremony TBD Begin Construction TBD Construction substantially complete – Phase 1 Construction TBD Construction substantially complete – Phase 2 Construction TBD Ribbon Cutting Ceremony TBD Restoration complete TBD Page 2 Trail Schedule Update – Galpin Lake Road and Smithtown Road (East) Smithtown Road East (LRT Trail to Country Club Road) Walkway Schedule 6/03/14 Planning Commission recommendation to Council re trail segment for following year 6/23/14 Council authorizes preparation of survey and Feasibility Report /14/14 – 9/10/14 Survey (30 days) – (In Process) 7 /18/14–10/10/14 Feasibility Report (30 days) – 8 10/21/14 Planning Commission review of feasibility report and trail walk 10/21/14 Planning Commission recommendation to Council re Feasibility Report 10/27/14 Council approves Feasibility Report 10/30/14 Planning Commission holds Neighborhood Meeting (Open House) 12/08/14 Council award of land acquisition services and authorizes preparation of Plans and Specifications 12/11/14 - Preparation of Plans and Specifications (90-120 days) (99% complete) 5/31/15 2/1/15 - Land Acquisition Process (start approx. mid-way through plans and specs) 8/31/15 Complete parcel descriptions and legal descriptions o Review proposed easements with staff/attorney o Letters to property owners regarding survey staking o Field stake proposed easements for Appraiser/RW Agent o Easement viewing – parcel owner and RW Agent on-site o Appraisal information o Appraisal review o Council considers resolution to authorize staff to make offers and eminent domain schedule o Prepare and deliver offers to parcel owners o 3/23/15 Begin eminent domain action /03/15 Neighborhood informational meeting (Open House) 6 Council approves Plans and Specifications and authorizes ad for Bids 7/13/15 8/21/15 Receive bids for construction 8/24/15 City possession of easements/letter of compliance Council awards Construction Contract 8/24/15 9/09/15 Neighborhood preconstruction meeting Groundbreaking Ceremony 9/14/15 5/02/16 Begin Construction Contractor completed tree removal 2/24/16 6/30/16 Construction substantially complete Ribbon Cutting Ceremony 6/30/16 6/30/16 Restoration complete