The URL can be used to link to this page

05-29-18 CC Reg Mtg Agenda PacketCITY OF SHOREWOOD CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, MAY 29, 2018 AGENDA 1. CITY COUNCIL ONSITE STORMWATER TOUR Review drainage at 24890 Yellowstone Trail 24890 YELLOWSTONE TRAIL ONSITE STORMWATER TOUR 6:15 P.M. CITY OF SHOREWOOD CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING TUESDAY, MAY 29, 2018 AGENDA 1. CONVENE CITY COUNCIL MEETING A. Roll Call B. Review Agenda 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7:00 P.M. Mayor Zerby Johnson Labadie Siakel Sundberg Attachments 2. CONSENT AGENDA — Motion to approve items on the Consent Agenda & Adopt Resolutions Therein: A. City Council Work Session Minutes of May 14, 2018 Minutes B. City Council Regular Meeting Minutes of May 14, 2018 Minutes C. Approval of the Verified Claims List Claims List D. Data Practices Policy Annual Update Clerk Memo Resolution 18 -052 E. Accept Quote for Painting of Fire Hydrants F. Approve Agreement between SLMPD and City of Excelsior for Council meeting security detail G. Authorize Advertisement for Full Time Finance Director H. Approve Change Order No. 3: 2017 Street Reclamation Project 3. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR (No Council Action will be taken) A. 4. PUBLIC HEARING 5. REPORTS AND PRESENTATIONS A. Met Council Population Estimates Public Works Director Memo Resolution 18 -053 City Administrator Memo City Administrator Memo Engineer Memo Resolution 18 -054 City Administrator Memo CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA — MAY 29, 2018 Page 2 6. PARKS A. Report by Larry Brown on 05 -08 -18 Parks Commission Meeting Draft Minutes 7. PLANNING 8. ENGINEERING /PUBLIC WORKS A. Award Quote for Watermain Improvements, Howards Point Road Public Works Director Memo Resolution 18 -055 B. 2018 Reconstruction of Riviera, Mann, and Shorewood Lane: Engineer Memo Approve Plans and Specifications, and Authorize Advertisement for Bids Resolution 18 -056 C. Approval of Echo Road Easement: 5745 Echo Road Engineer Memo D. Review Proposal to Evaluate Minnetonka Country Club Drainage City Administrator Memo E. Accept Bids and Award Contract for the 2018 Seal Coat Improvements Engineer Memo Resolution 18 -057 9. GENERAL /NEW BUSINESS 10. STAFF AND COUNCIL REPORTS A. Administrator and Staff 1. Monthly Budget Report Interim Finance Director Memo 2. B. Mayor and City Council 11. ADJOURN CITY OF SHOREWOOD CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION MONDAY, MAY 14, 2018 MINUTES 1. CONVENE CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION Mayor Zerby called the meeting to order at 6:00 P.M. A. Roll Call Present. Mayor Zerby; Councilmembers Johnson Commissioners Vassar, Rock, and Ashmore; Darling; Public Works Director Brown Absent: Councilmember Siakel and Labadie Parks Commissioners present: Justin Mangold, Ed Rock, B. Review Agenda As a quorum was not yet present, the agenda 2. JOINT SESSION WITH PARKS COMM Mayor Zerby noted that there was not a quorum but the surface options at Badger Park. cons 2a 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD COUNCIL CHAMBERS 6:00 P.M. at 6:11 mp.m.), and Sundberg; inistrator Lerud; Planning Director y vassar. PARK SURFACE OPTIONS that he thinks discussion could start regarding Planning Director Darling stated that as part of the rehab for Badger Park, the Parks Commission had recommended the wood fiber, however, the Council wanted to consider other options because that wood fiber had to be refi�eshcd frequentl' and had an untidy appearance. She put together cost estimates for discussion at this joint meeting. She'noted they are looking at excess year end funds to cover the cost of the price difference in material; She reviewed some of the upcoming park projects planned for the next few years. Mayor Zerby asked about Manor Park as a handicap accessible park and asked if there was concrete poured underneath. Director. Brown stated that Manor Park playground is ADA accessible. He stated that he believes there was asphalt underneath with a mat over the top. Mayor Zerby asked if that would be an option in this case because he is assuming asphalt would be less expensive than concrete. Planning Director Darling stated that she will check on whether when they said concrete they simply meant it had to be a hard surface or not. Director Brown stated that he thinks asphalt would be about half of the cost of concrete. Councilmember Sundberg asked what "engineered wood fiber" is. Planning Director Darling explained that it is a wood chip that has had all the dust removed, so it isn't as dirty as your garden wood chips. She stated that to discuss costs, the poured in place option came out at $140,451, assuming concrete as the hard surface. She noted that she did not have the cost of the BMP for drainage yet because they haven't bid the project, but the design will be $4,200. CITY OF SHOREWOOD WORK SESSION MEETING MINUTES MAY 14, 2018 Page 2 of 4 Councilmember Sundberg asked about the lifetime of this surface compared to wood chips. Planning Director Darling stated that this product has a lifetime of 15 years and wood chips need to be refreshed every 3 years. Councilmember Johnson arrived at 6:11 p.m. Mayor Zerby recognized that a quorum was now present. Commissioner Mangold asked what the total cost for the poured rubber would be including the engineering costs. Planning Director Darling reviewed the numbers and noted that if the City can do asphalt instead of concrete, that will drop the cost. She noted that another surface I that is being used more frequently is artificial turf and because it is considered pervious, a BMP does not need to be completed. She noted that this product also has a 15 -year lifespan and the total cost is around $80,000. Commissioner Vassar stated that she had never seen that kind of surface at a park before and asked if Planning Director Darling knew of any parks in the area that had it. Planning Director Darling stated that she had only seen it in the catalogues. Commissioner Mangold stated that they had discussed this type of material, but with the whole issue that comes with rubber tires, they stayed away from any deep discussion because there was such a hard decision to use it for turf, let alone a children's playground. Councilmember Johnson asked if they were referring to staph infections from the material. Commissioner Mangold stated that it was more the possible cancer, relation from the material getting hot and breathing in the fumes. Councilmember Johnson stated that Minnewashta school went away from that material because they thought the kids were eating it. Councilmember Vassar stated that it is also similar to wood chips in that is needs to be cleaned out and refilled and the material can get 'taken away very easily., Mayor Zerby asked if it wasn't wood chips, whether the Park Commission had a recommendation. Commissioner Mangold stated that his issue is if the Council were to give the Park Commission another $70,000 to $100,000, upgrading-the surface of the playground would not be where he would choose to put that money. Ac stated he thought it would be better spent on the perimeter trail. He understands that the Council wants this park to look great, but, he doesn't think this is where extra money should be spent. Commissioner Rock stated that he understands Commissioner Mangold's concern about the trail, but he would like to see this park' finished off right with the rubber surface. He stated that he did not think that $70,000 is enough to get the trail rolling especially with the drain tile and grading that will be needed. He stated that he had not really considered the artificial turf option so he would need more information on that material. Commissioner Mangold stated he was just using the perimeter trail as an example. He noted that if there were more money available in the Park budget, this would not be the first thing on his list to use the money towards. He stated that he is concerned that if the trail is not put in when they are working on Badger Park that it will never get done. CITY OF SHOREWOOD WORK SESSION MEETING MINUTES MAY 14, 2018 Page 3 of 4 Councilmember Sundberg asked who the Badger Park trail would serve. Planning Director Darling asked if the perimeter trail Commissioner Mangold was referring to is the one that would go through the woods. Commissioner Mangold stated that it is the one around the lacrosse field and over to the tennis courts. Planning Director Darling stated that she is already preparing to bid that trail. Mayor Zerby asked if there was any handicap accessible equipment in this park. Planning Director Darling stated that it was all handicap accessible, but not all barrier free, for example part of the jungle gym. Councilmember Sundberg stated that keeping in mind this equipment is handicap accessible, the poured rubber or artificial turf would be more handicap accessible than wood chips. Planning Director Darling noted that wood chips count as handicap turf or poured rubber would be much easier to maneuver on than w Mayor Zerby stated that he still likes the idea of the poured rub engineering" to see if asphalt can be used as an alternative to Administrator Lerud suggested finding some examples Councilmember Johnson asked how much of the $140,00 Planning Director Darling stated that it is just the rubber surface stated that it may actually last longer than 15 years, but the recoi Mayor Zerby asked how the rubber surface at Manor Park was holding was holding up great. Mayor Zerby asked what the Park Commission had on its "wish but agreed that the artificial what he calls "value turf has been us to be redone every 15 years. the hard surface underneath. She .ion is to test it after 15 years. Brown stated that it Commissioner Mangold stated that they have some large CIS' items that have been pushed around because they are hoping to get more life out of existing equipment. He stated that they also have equipment at the end of their 20 -25 -year life span, the hockey boards at Cathcart, the tennis courts as well as everything they are trying to do at Badger Park. Planning Director Darling, stated that she will, pull together more research and report back to the Parks Commission for their next meetmR and let them make a recommendation to the Council. Commissioner Mangold asked what the timeline was for making a decision. Planning Director Darling stated that the playground equipment will be delivered the first week in September, so the surface will need to be ready by then. She would like to be able to bid this out soon, so the engineering documents can be ready. Commissioners Mangold, Vassar and Rock left the meeting. 3. CHRISTMAS LAKE AQUATIC INVASIVE SPECIES (AIS) PROJECT — Joe Shneider Joe Shneider, 21125 Christmas Lane asked the other residents present to introduce themselves. Michele Vidor, 860 Pleasant View Road; Greg Elliot, 1050 Holly Lane; and, Todd Erickson, 6030 Ridge Rd., introduced themselves. CITY OF SHOREWOOD WORK SESSION MEETING MINUTES MAY 14, 2018 Page 4 of 4 Mr. Shneider thanked the Council for taking the time to talk to them. He gave a brief slide show presentation that covered what is in Christmas Lake from an AIS perspective, including curly -leaf pondweed, Eurasian water milfoil and zebra mussels. He reviewed some of the things they have done in the past to try to control them. He stated that they were part of a pilot project in 2012 and 2013 where weevils were used, to control Eurasian water milfoil, but that program was discontinued. He stated that they believe that weevils have been successful in controlling the Eurasian water milfoil. He noted that the presence of zebra mussels was confirmed and treated in 2014 near the boat landing, however, an adult zebra mussel was found a mile away from the boat landing in 2015. He reviewed the data from the watershed district regarding the water chemistry of the lake and the zebra mussel density levels. He stated that their homeowner's organization has strong resolve in continuing to treat this and are working hard to reduce the risk of AIS. They are planning to restart the milfoil weevil program in 201,8 in conjunction with a professor from Middlebury College who is from Minnesota. He noted that the,plan is to use high school students to do all the hard work and the professor will provide the guidance. He stated that the Dope is that this program will eventually be able to be reproduced throughout the State to reduce the Eurasian milfoil problem. He reviewed the cost of the program and noted that it is quite expensive, even with grant assistance. He stated that they would like to ask the City to consider providing some financial assistance for their efforts. Councilmember Sundberg stated that she really liked aggressively and taking it upon themselves to tackle this is look to see if the City can help them out financially. Mayor Zerby noted that he and Administrator' grant program through the City that would allo' stated that it would need to be brought in front o this kind of environmental stewardship in the cc 4. ADJOURN Johnson moved, Zerby seconded, Adjourning the Cit 2018, at 6:43 P.M. Motion passed 510. was thinking "creatively and that she would support taking a been taking,about' creating an environmental i amount of funds for programs like this. He [;,but he would like to find a way to encourage - ouncil Work Session Meeting of May 14, Scott Zerby, Mayor CITY OF SHOREWOOD CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MONDAY, MAY 14, 2018 MINUTES 1. CONVENE CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING Mayor Zerby called the meeting to order at 7:01 P.M. A. Roll Call Present. Mayor Zerby; Councilmembers Johnson, Labadi Administrator Lerud; City Clerk Thone; Plannil Works Brown; and City Engineer Fauske Absent: Councilmember Siakel. B. Review Agenda Mayor Zerby noted that staff had requested that agenda item applicant. Sundberg moved, Labadie seconded, approving the agenda, w 2. CONSENT AGENDA Mayor Zerby reviewed the items on the Consent Agenda. 2B 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7:00 P.M. Attorney Keene; City ig; Director of Public removed per a request from the Motion passed 4/0. Johnson moved, Labadie seconded, Approving the Motions Contained on the Consent Agenda and Adopting the Resolutions Therein. A: "" City Council Work Session Minutes of April 23, 2018 B.'— City Council regular Meeting Minutes of April 23, 2018 C. Approval of the Verified Claims List D. Approve Agreement between SLMPD & City of Excelsior for Summer Dock and Park Patrol Services E. Approve Variance Setback: 5550 Marsh Pointe Drive, Adopting RESOLUTION NO. 18 -045, "A Resolution granting a setback variance to a side lot line abutting Marsh Pointe Drive for property located at 5550 Marsh Pointe Drive in the R -IA Zoning District." F. 2018 Deer Management Program CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES MAY 14, 2018 Page 2 of 12 G. Accept Improvements and Final Payment for 2016 Streets Project, RESOLUTION NO. 18 -047, "A Resolution accepting improvements and authorizing final payment for the 2016 trunk watermain extension project" H. Approve City Hall Closure May 25 Motion passed 4/0. 3. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR A. MNSPECT - Scott Qualle Mr. Qualle stated that it was his understanding that the City Official, Joe Pazandak. He noted that MNSPECT has been Official since 2007. He stated that they have done many of ,1 as Building Official Pazandak works on transitioning out o introduce himself to the Council so they were familiar with 1 He noted that they currently serve 18 communities in the ar help serve those communities. He stated that Ty, from MN` inspections and has worked hard to master Building Officiz He noted that Building Official Pazandak has municipal di like schools, hospitals and nursing homes and it may be h, same authority. He noted that he had read the notes from the discussed how they planned to replace Building Official Pat be difficult to find a qualified candidate and would like the the opportunity to serve the City in this capacity_ B. Organized Trash; Collection,I)iscussion looking ahead to replace its Building working as a back -up to the Building ie;inspections for the last few months, his role. He stated that he wanted to and the services MNSPECT offers. end have a staff of 18 employees to CT has handled much of the City's izandak's systems and procedures. ration authority to handle facilities to find a replacement that has that cting last month where the Council lake,, He stated that he thinks it may nel to consider giving MNSPECT Mayor Zerby stated that the Council has received a number of e -mails and phone calls from residents regarding the issue' and have heard both for and against the idea. He stated that the Council is aware that a mailing went out by a 'third party to the residents, but, noted that the Council is in the middle of the ,process and not at the end. He stated that there is nothing on tonight's agenda for a vote, but he understands that there are a lot of questions about what the Council is considering. He asked City Administrator Lerud to give a brief overview before the residents speak. He stated that his goal for tonight's discussion is educational so everyone knows the process and what is City Administrator Lerud stated that the Council started discussion around organized garbage collection at a retreat in early 2017. At the January 31, 2018 meeting, the Council directed staff to begin negotiations with the garbage haulers to look toward an organized system. He noted that on April 9, 2018, the Council initiated the process by calling for public notice and a desire to meet with the haulers. The first meeting with the haulers was held on May 8, 2018. He noted that copies of the priorities established by the Council as well as a flowchart that showed the process were available in the lobby. He stated that part of this process will include a public hearing later in the process, but, noted that the City is in the very early stage of the process. He stated that just by the Council initiating the process does not mean there is an expected outcome and may mean there will be no change to the current system. He noted that all of the documents pertinent to this issue are available on the website, under the Living in Shorewood tab, then under Environment and Garbage Collection. CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES MAY 14, 2018 Page 3 of 12 Mayor Zerby stated that he realized there are a lot of emotions surrounding this issue but reminded those in attendance that any comments be given respectfully and that residents give the Council time to discuss the issue. Kay Engle, 21115 Minnetonka Blvd, showed a flyer she had received in the mail and stated that her neighbors had signed a petition opposing organized trash collection. She asked if the end result would be that the all of the residents get to vote on this issue. Mayor Zerby stated that he wasn't sure that City Administrator Lerud explained the concept. The City would stay with the same number of haulers it currently has, but, consolidate each hauler into corners of the City. He explained that the advantages of this process would be the trucks would stop at every home, instead of every other home and then another truck would come in and get a few more. He noted that the idea is that there will be less trucks on the road, less environmental impact, and a more organized approach to trash collection. He stated that to answer the question of whether this will be put to a vote, the way government works is that the citizens vote for the Council to represent them and then they vote on their behalf. He stated that the Council is open to hearing discussion about what people think, but ultimately it will be up to the Council to put it to a vote. Ms. Engle stated that she felt this should have been communicated better to the residents and not in fine print on the newsletter because it involves the people of the City. Mayor Zerby stated that he will make sure there is a link on the front page of the website. Ms. Engle suggested putting it in a larger, more noticeable print. Councilmember Sundberg stated that there will be public, widespread announcements when the time comes for public opinion. She stated what the Council is doing right now is simply fact gathering and understanding the pros and cons of the situation. She stated that there will be no decisions made right now. She stated that the Council absolutely wants to hear the resident's opinions, but, reiterated that they are not even close to the time to make a decision because they haven't gathered all the necessary information yet. Councilmember Labadie stated that she thinks the feeling of "being in the dark" is because the Council is truly at the very beginning of this process. She stated that the flyer that was sent out did not give that impression. She stated that the Council is happy that there are so many people here tonight and reiterated Councilmember Sundberg's statement that the Council wants to hear residents opinions before a vote on this matter. Ms. Engle submitted the flyer she received and the petition signed by her neighbors and presented it to City Administrator Lerud. Bill Lester, 28265 Boulder Circle, stated that he received the flyer also. He noted that the website on the flyer is owned by a waste hauler and he thinks that is why it is rather inflammatory. He encouraged the Council to continue taking a look at the possibility of consolidating the services because it makes sense with regard to road repairs and other issues. He hopes that the Council will not be swayed or influenced by this hauler trying to get everybody upset. He asked that the Council see if there was a way to provide composting with the service. Peter Holmberg, 5955 Cajed Lane, stated that he had a question on the first item on the flow chart that the City Administrator had mentioned. He stated that it states that the Council will provide CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES MAY 14, 2018 Page 4 of 12 notice to residents and haulers. He stated that the first he heard of this was also through the flyer that was sent out by the hauler. He stated that the system the Council is considering would still cause elimination of choice. He stated that he has seen recycling and stormwater management fees go up. He stated that he currently has Randy's Environmental and has had fantastic service. He stated that his prices for garbage hauling has actually gone down. He stated that he has lived in the City for 30 years and he can remember when the Council at the time presented lies and misinformation to the residents about the costs of City water. He asked that the Council make sure they were presenting accurate information and expressed his desire to keep what he has and not have anyone tell him what size garbage can they have to have. Cindy Drench, 27070 Noble Road, stated that she heard about this from her neighbors. She stated that free choice is what most people want. She asked the Council what they think the problem is that they are trying to solve. Mayor Zerby stated that the Council has heard from residents expressing concern about the number of trucks that go up and down the road each day. He stated that truck traffic is disruptive and not peaceful. He stated that on his road, there are five haulers, plus recyclers and yard waste collectors. He stated just for his street alone there at least eight trucks that are on their road to serve 10 homes. He stated that there are still a few dirt roads in town that get eaten alive by all the truck traffic. He stated that there is also the environmental impact to consider with the current system because it is not efficient to stop at every fourth house instead of every house to pick something up it is using more gas per customer to do it. He reiterated that exploring the option of organized trash collection is because it may be better for the roads, the peace of the community and the environment. He stated that he just listed the pros, but realizes there are cons, as well. He noted that one of these is reducing the competitive environment with the haulers. He stated that one thing they have already learned from their legal counsel is that garbage haulers are exempt from price fixing laws, so, they can get together for coffee and discuss prices and decide what they will charge everybody. He stated that they have also heard about the "game" of a smaller hauler coming in and getting a bunch of customers and then selling out to a bigger hauler later. He stated that he truly does understand that there are pros and cons to this issue and he is wrestling with them as he thinks about it. Councilmember Johnson noted that he is the "newbie" on the Council and has learned that the biggest budget item in the City is fixing the roads. If there is anything that the Council can do to reduce that budget, that is of interest to him, because hopefully it means less taxes. Councilmember Labadie stated that the Council members are also residents with diverse backgrounds between them. She stated that the Council is just trying to find out the facts, since their background is not engineering or waste management, to determine is this is something worth pursuing. She stated that the Council has not discussed this amongst themselves nor do they have a grand scheme in place to create a government managed trash system. She stated to answer Ms. Drench's question about what we are trying to "solve" she would have to answer that we aren't trying to solve anything, but, are simply looking at some options. Councilmember Sundberg stated that she agreed with all the statements made by the Council. She stated that as the Council goes through the assessment process, one of the things she will be looking at is whether the City can leverage and have some clout in negotiating pricing with the haulers. Ms. Drench, thanked the Council for taking the time to find facts. She agreed that the roads are bad this year and noted that there is a lot of truck traffic in her area that is not related to garbage hauling and asked if they were assessed fees. CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES MAY 14, 2018 Page 5 of 12 Mayor Zerby stated that the trucks are subject to weight restrictions and can be pulled over by the police to be weighed and potentially assessed fines. He noted that because of staff limitations, the City relies on complaints to enforce these kinds of issues. Ms. Drench stated that it would be very interesting to see the weight of garbage trucks and the distribution throughout the City. Clint Bucher, 5490 Manitou Lane, stated that he has lived in the area for over 30 years and has had experience with most of the haulers. He stated that they like to do their business locally, so are not using the company that is based out of Chicago. He supports small businesses, like Randy's and would hate to see that go. He stated that he is biting his tongue about the comments made that this needs to be done because of road repair. He asked what the City had been doing with all the money it has been collecting for road repair. He agreed that there are a lot of trucks, but noted it was partly the citizens fault for producing so much garbage. He stated that he didn't think it was fair to portray the garbage trucks as monsters in this situation and asked about school buses and their contribution to road damage. He stated that he has two bus drivers living near him and they drive their bus to and from home on the City roads, even during weight restriction times. He stated that there are also huge construction trucks that are coming in and out that aren't being vilified like the garbage trucks. He stated that the Council does have the ability to vote on behalf of the residents, but they also have the option to let the citizens vote. He urged the Council to do their research, publicize their findings and then let the people vote. Peter Wattson, 5495 Timber Lane, stated that he had lived here for more than 42 years and has had almost every trash hauler and almost all of them have been very good. His current carrier is Randy's, and they are very good. He appreciates the work that the Council is engaging in. He stated that he believes change is easy and improvements are hard. He thinks that the Council really is looking to make a better trash hauling system for the residents and has confidence in the process that they are using to come to a decision. Mary Wiersum, 27065 Noble Road, stated that she had lived here for 21 years and have gone through several trash haulers and stated she feels competition works to help manage costs. She stated that if the City goes through with this they are stealing the residents ability to create a competitive market place. Mike Cannon, 28170 Woodside Road, expressed his thanks to the Council for picking up what is clearly a difficult issue. He stated that when he was young and in school, he was taught that the governments job was to not be afraid to bring up things that people have strong feelings about. He understands the strong feelings around taking away choice, but government should do what is for the greater good of everybody, not just the people that have time to come and express their opinions. He stated that the idea of putting it to a vote is a great idea. He stated that one issue that has not been brought up in tonight's discussion, is safety. He gave the example of Smithtown Road during a school day or on Woodside Road that is a dead end and the trucks drive in and need to back all the way out which can be dangerous especially if there are children around. He stated that he is recently retired and obviously spends more time in the City now. He doesn't want to go outside on Wednesdays because it stinks from all the diesel fuel. He stated to address concerns about cost and competition, he suggests bidding it every year to drive the costs down and noted that the efficiency should be such that if the City does its job right, there should be able to be lower costs. He stated that he isn't even opposed to going to one City -wide carrier if that would make it more efficient and drive the cost down. He reiterated again that he understood and agreed with everyone's strong CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES MAY 14, 2018 Page 6 of 12 feelings on this subject, but, noted that safety considerations should be given because he has seen a lot of close calls with people passing the trucks in no passing lanes. He asked the Council not to bow down to the loud ones, but to do what is right for the greater good. Mayor Zerby stated that he feels the Council has heard a pretty good cross section of opinions from those present tonight and stated that they will do what they can to make sure the process is clearly understood and is visible with information posted on the website. He encouraged residents to contact Council members or staff at any time if they wanted more information on any issue. He thanked the residents for taking the time to come to the meeting and express their opinions. Councilmember Johnson stated that with regard to the organization that put out the flyer, he requested that City Hall be contacted to get a proper phone number to contact him. He noted ;ir mission nt, natural the size of ect quality ,y own can education vas one of ty of year - stated that mique new ;d on park rystal. He landmark on June 3, all system. d that they o projects. cities. He ren on the have been Councilmember Sundberg stated that she is happy to see another government entity that wants to work with the City. She noted that she liked the ideas they had on Freeman Park and hopes the City can work with them to bring some of them to fruition. Councilmember Labadie stated that she loves Three River's Park District and had just finished her fifth golf lesson today. She stated that any activity she puts her kids in, she also does it, whether it is skiing or snowboarding and loves the fact that there are options for adults. She would like to know more about the CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES MAY 14, 2018 Page 7 of 12 Operation No Limits program because she sees that as potentially life changing for juveniles who have entered the criminal justice system. She is also excited about some of the senior programs that are available. Councilmember Johnson stated he is also a big fan of the Three River's Park District and a big fan of $17/ night skiing at Hyland. He stated that he would like to talk about ways to work together regarding item 8A. on tonight's agenda, drainage at Freeman Park. He stated that if he has understood things correctly, the drainage issues are partly caused by much of the debris within the railroad authority areas. His understanding is that the City cannot go in and remove the debris and the railroad authority has no desire to remove it. Mr. Gunyou stated that they would absolutely be willing to work with the :,City on this issue. Councilmember Johnson stated that he has seen many trees with the little pink ribbon around them and it has been reported that even with the Three River's Park District comes in and cuts,down trees, they are also tossing the trees into the railroad ditch. He would ask that when the trees are removed that they are taken out with them when they leave and not left to cause more drainage problems. He reiterated a desire to work with Three River's Park District to remove this debris and try to resolve the drainage issue before it becomes a much bigger issue. 6. PARKS 7. PLANNING A. Request an extension to the Comprehensive Plan Submission Deadline Planning Director Darling stated that as a preemptive issue, staff is" recommending submitting for an extension to the submittal deadline. Zerby moved, Johnsen seconded, to request an extension to the Comprehensive Plan Submission Deadline, Adopting RESOLUTION NO. 18 -048, "A Resolution requesting additional time within which to complete Comprehensive Plan "Decennial"' review and update obligation." Motion passed 4/0. 8. ENGINEERING /PUBLIC WORKS A. Professional Services Agreement for Western Surface Water Management, Phase 1 Director Brown explained that staff has been working with the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District to come up with a plan for the western part of the City. He noted that staff is recommending working with WSB and the funds for the service to come from the storm water management fund. Mayor Zerby noted the cost was around $10,000 and asked what the City would get for that money. Director Brown noted that there will be a feasibility report with a map and the top two recommended alternatives. He stated that he understands that it doesn't sound like much, but, would ask the Council to realize that if the City took this on itself, it wouldn't be able to meet the goals that would be acceptable to the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES MAY 14, 2018 Page 8 of 12 Mayor Zerby stated that he usually likes to take a look at labor costs and this project would be about week and a half of full time work. He asked if Director Brown really thought that much time needed to be spent on this. Director Brown stated that a lot of this was going to be coordination with the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. He stated that he feels spending 60 hours working with the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District would easily be met and thinks they will probably spend more time than that. Sundberg moved, Labadie seconded, Adopting RESOLUTION NO. 18 -049, "A Resolution to approve a professional services agreement with WSB & Associates for the Water Resources Planning and Capital Improvement Planning for the Freeman Park Drainages Area. ' City Project 18 -04." Motion passed 4/0. B. Accept Quotes for Boulder Bridge Well H Director Brown explained that the roof is in need of rel from woodpeckers. He stated that staff had wanted to ha, in place in the area will not allow that. He noted that th( with a maintenance free siding and reviewed the quotes was from Minnesota Roofing, Company for $38,620. Councilmember Johnson stated that he had driven through HOA would not be responsible for the upkeep of this build] metal 'e now Boulder nts siding has had quite a bit of damage of on this structure; but the covenants ) ooing at a cedar shake shingle along .n received. He noted the low quote lridg�e many times and asked why the Director Brown stated that when the development first cage about,; the development agreement stated that the infrastructure would be installed by the developer as a public works improvement project and then turned over to the City for perpetual ,maintenance. The City does not own the land under the structure as it is on common space of the subdivision, but, does own the building and the infrastructure inside. Mayor Zerby asked how many homes this served. Director Brown stated that the Boulder Bridge well feeds into the west water tower as does the Badger well. He stated that there are two wells located on this property. Sundberg moved, Johnson seconded, Adopting RESOLUTION NO. 18 -050, "A Resolution awarding quote for the Boulder Bridge well exterior improvement project." Motion passed 4/0. C. Accept Request for Speed Awareness Display on Smithtown Road Director Brown stated that staff had received a request from a resident at 23655 Smithtown Road with what is called the "speed zone' near Minnewashta Elementary School. He noted that staff is recommending accepting the request and asking the SLMPD to conduct a speed study. He stated that staff has also discussed the fact that there are no rules to govern how many of these types of requests the City will conduct every year and where the funding will come from. He suggested that the Council discuss this issue because these types of request are becoming more and more frequent. If the Council approves this speed awareness request, he would like to complete it more quickly because he wants to make sure that school has not been let out for the summer when they are capturing data. Councilmember Labadie stated that she didn't disagree with the request for a speed study, but, questions the location along Smithtown Road. She stated that she doesn't think it should be right near the school CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES MAY 14, 2018 Page 9 of 12 because that will not be the most accurate assessment because of people slowing down to pick or drop off their children at the school. Director Brown stated that staff agrees with her concern. He stated that they would look at the entire corridor from a traffic management standpoint and decide where the most effective area will be. Councilmember Sundberg asked when the speed study would be initiated. Director Brown stated that his hope is as soon as the police chief can make the equipment available. Councilmember Sundberg stated that she lives near this area and thinks that the speeding problem doesn't seem to be associated with the school traffic. She stated that outside of school hours, people come flying through there and agrees a study is warranted. Johnson moved, Sundberg seconded, to accept the Smithtown Road. Motion passed 4/0. 9. GENERAL /NEW BUSINESS - None 10. STAFF AND COUNCIL REPORTS A. Administrator and Staff Administrator Lerud noted that Wells Fargo served th our investment accounts, so those funds have been mo accounts. Other Engineer Fauske updated the contractor was out at Badger was actually still fi ozcn, so tb planning to demolish the warn paving and striping the week e another project she would like The contractor for this project they are finally looking to get project should be done by the Mayor Zerby asked if if they were aware of a speed awareness display on e that they would no longer be serving ��41stered investment advisor for the 4M it on some of the current construction projects. She noted that the take a look at backfilling behind the concrete curb and the stock pile need to wait until there is warmer weather. She noted that they are use the week of May 28, 2018 and complete the other work, including 4,'2018, but noted that all of this is dependent on weather. She stated ate the Council on is the road reclaim project that was bid out last fall. slight issue with one of their subcontractors going bankrupt, however next week on Howard's Point Road. She noted that the entire reclaim part of June 2018. been an open house or informational meeting for residents in the area and le and plans for their roads. Engineer Fauske stated that residents were mailed a newsletter last Friday. She noted that there will also be updates and details available on the website and also plan to work with the Communications Coordinator to make sure they are getting up to date information out to the residents, especially if there are weather delays. She noted that she had e- mailed the marina this afternoon to make sure they were aware and had her contact information. Councilmember Labadie thanked Engineer Fauske for answering some of her questions earlier today via e- mail. She stated that she had numerous residents asking about whether there were weight restrictions on CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES MAY 14, 2018 Page 10 of 12 the road relating to boats, trailers, and trucks that haul them while it is in the reclamation process. She suggested that Engineer Fauske answer the question here at the meeting for anyone who may be watching at home. Engineer Fauske explained the reclamation process and what happens to the roadway and noted that they do not anticipate any damage to the road from allowing trucks, boats and trailers on the road. Councilmember Labadie stated that she lives on Howard's Point Road and has not received a mailing. She stated that she thinks residents on all the planned roads are really not aware of the timeframe because it has been pushed back so often. She suggested letting the busses know that these projects are coming so they are aware, even though they can drive on the roadways. Engineer Fauske stated that she will follow up with her contact at they are aware of the plans for the roads. Director Brown stated that what seems to have worked the best is when residents address or phone number to text to keep people updated on these t5 may be reluctant and worry about getting a bunch of Spam, but that to contact City Hall and give this information so alerts can be sent the "hot soils" issue and has decided that for every roadway where to be more proactive and expose the valves and replace the bolts prevent a situation where a new road has been put down and there has to be dug up again. He noted that staff is working on a change of the project. Mayor Zerby asked what cathodic protection was, tomorrow to make sure City an e -mail of projects. He'understands people t the case. He encouraged residents He stated that staff has talked about ,lamation is done, they are planning the watermain system, so they can subseauent watermain break and it cathodic protection as part Director Brown explained that many times soil is acidic and will eat through bolts when there is moisture involved. He stated that different bolts have been tested and it appears that the best is 3/16 stainless that has been sprayed with a substance that is similar to an undercoating on a car. Mayor Zerby asked if this process would require road closures. Director Brown stated that it may, which is why the notice sent out was fairly generic because they are still working on the schedule with the pipe layer to figure out where traffic can continue to go through and where it won't be able to. Mayor Zerby encouraged staff to continue communicating with residents and suggested reaching out to Communications Coordinator Moore to make sure they are utilizing all the available avenues including social media such as No tDoorand Facebook. Engineer Fauske stated that she also wanted to update the Council on a reconstruction project near Riviera Lane. She noted that earlier this year, Council gave direction for plans and specifications to include the watermain. She thinks this will be brought to the Council for approval to proceed with the bid process at the next meeting. She stated that the next project is the sealcoat project as a cooperative agreement with neighboring communities. She stated that the bids should come in June for a start date in August and completion in September. She stated that for the Shorewood Lane ravine, there has been a delay because of permitting requirements through the watershed district and a requirement to get an easement over the 100 -year high water level. She noted that staff has been working with the City Attorney's office to get that paperwork finalized. CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES MAY 14, 2018 Page 11 of 12 Mayor Zerby asked if the dates of Tour De Tonka had been considered as part of the sealcoating plans. Engineer Fauske stated that she will confirm the dates and the route with Mr. Litfin. She stated that the other projects that she would like to update the Council are outside of the City limits, for example Mill Street. She stated that the City of Excelsior notice some watermain issues, and the road has been closed since April and is scheduled to open back up in June. She stated that she had reached out the MNDot regarding work being done at the Vine /Hill intersection of Highway 7. She noted that she has also reached out to neighboring communities in an effort to provide a map that all the communities could use and put on their websites that shows street projects across municipal boundaries. She noted that there are some things included on the map that have not gotten final Council approval, but there is a disclaimer that they are pending final approval. Mayor Zerby asked about the Met Council lift station. Engineer Fauske stated that the lift station has its certificate of occupancy from the Building Official, however, they still need to complete some landscaping. Planning Director Darling stated that she had nothing to Mayor Zerby noted that he had heard rumblings about the Davis -- project and asked that Planning take a more active role to take a look at what is aoina on over there. Planning Director Darling stated that they did meet with the construction tear this morning to get ahead of some of the concerns. She noted that the primary concern,they have heard is the parking issue with the contractors. She stated that the contractor is going to assign only sip vehicles the ability to park on site and the rest will be shuttled back and forth. Mayor Zerby stated or fourth year Director Brown nested that the intersection. He stated that tl that they also discussed final d that he felt it was a good meetit to flush hydrants and do roadA He noted that there is a spring with a shred event at City Hall. Councilmember Sundberg asks after flushing when it is discok s nerves are getting a little raw because this project is in its third t manager has pint somebody onsite full -time monitoring traffic at the ted today and they have already seen some improvement. He stated ,e for the ;,project and encouraged them to follow the plan. He stated hopes to see good progress. He stated that Public Works is continuing ,eeping. He stated that major park maintenance is also in full swing. up event that is taking place Saturday, May 19, 2018 in conjunction for clarification regarding flushing and whether the water is safe to drink Director Brown stated that is a very common question and it is safe. He stated the red color is from iron that is stirred up when they flush them. He stated that iron is safe to digest, it is just in a different form than a vitamin table because it is oxidized. He would suggest people stay away from doing light laundry loads while the water is discolored because it will stain the fabric. He stated that he is hoping to be done flushing hydrants in the next week and a half. Councilmember Johnson stated that for street sweeping, it is the City's process to start on the east side of town and make its way to the west. He stated that a neighbor of his suggested that the City consider flipping CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES MAY 14, 2018 Page 12 of 12 the order every other year so the people on the west side of the City get their streets swept a little sooner every other year and are not always last. Director Brown stated that the reason it happens this way is because the east side predominantly has edge control which helps minimize damage to roadways at the start when there is still frost on colder temperatures. Mayor Zerby asked if seasonal personnel had been hired yet for public works. Director Brown stated that he is thrilled to say that the City has two seasonal workers. He noted that the first individual started last week and the other one will start when he finishes college for the year. Clerk Thone stated that the annual tree sale pick -up will be held this Friday and Saturday. Mayor and City Council - None Johnson moved, Labadie seconded, Adjourning the at 8:50 P.M. Motion passed 4/0. Sandie Thone, City Cler 14, 2018, #2C MEETING TYPE City of Shorewood Council Meeting Item Regular Meeting Title / Subject: Verified Claims Meeting Date: May 29, 2018 Prepared by: Michelle Nguyen, Senior Accountant Greg Lerud, City Administrator Joe Rigdon, Interim Finance Director Attachments: Claims lists Policy Consideration: Should the attached claims against the City of Shorewood be paid? Background: Claims for council authorization. 64497 — 64533 & ACH 212,475.92 Total Claims $212,475.92 We have also included a payroll summary for the payroll period ending May 13, 2018. Financial or Budget Considerations: These expenditures are reasonable and necessary to provide services to our residents and funds are budgeted and available for these purposes. Options: The City Council is may accept the staff recommendation to pay these claims or may reject any expenditure it deems not in the best interest of the city. Recommendation / Action Requested: Staff recommends approval of the claims list as presented. Next Steps and Timelines: Checks will be distributed following approval. Account Number Debit Amount Credit Amount Description FUND 101 General Fund 101 -00- 1010 -0000 0.00 57,502.27 CASH AND INVESTMENTS 101 -11- 4103 -0000 1,716.64 0.00 PART -TIME 101 -11- 4122 -0000 131.31 0.00 FICA CONTRIB - CITY SHARE 101 -13- 4101 -0000 11,233.60 0.00 FULL -TIME REGULAR 101 -13- 4103 -0000 512.28 0.00 PART -TIME 101 -13- 4121 -0000 880.96 0.00 PERA CONTRIB - CITY SHARE 101 -13- 4122 -0000 888.82 0.00 FICA CONTRIB - CITY SHARE 101 -13- 4131 -0000 1,708.93 0.00 EMPLOYEE INSURANCE - CITY 101 -13- 4151 -0000 128.10 0.00 WORKERS COMPENSATION 101 -15- 4101 -0000 1,879.40 0.00 FULL -TIME REGULAR 101 -15- 4121 -0000 140.96 0.00 PERA CONTRIB - CITY SHARE 101 -15- 4122 -0000 141.26 0.00 FICA CONTRIB - CITY SHARE 101 -15- 4131 -0000 165.84 0.00 EMPLOYEE INSURANCE - CITY 101 -15- 4151 -0000 12.01 0.00 WORKERS COMPENSATION 101 -18- 4101 -0000 5,435.70 0.00 FULL -TIME REGULAR 101 -18- 4121 -0000 407.70 0.00 PERA CONTRIB - CITY SHARE 101 -18- 4122 -0000 412.26 0.00 FICA CONTRIB - CITY SHARE 101 -18- 4131 -0000 866.55 0.00 EMPLOYEE INSURANCE - CITY 101 -18- 4151 -0000 24.12 0.00 WORKERS COMPENSATION 101 -24- 4101 -0000 4,323.91 0.00 FULL -TIME REGULAR 101 -24- 4121 -0000 324.27 0.00 PERA CONTRIB - CITY SHARE 101 -24- 4122 -0000 292.32 0.00 FICA CONTRIB - CITY SHARE 101 -24- 4131 -0000 540.00 0.00 EMPLOYEE INSURANCE - CITY 101 -24- 4151 -0000 36.68 0.00 WORKERS COMPENSATION 101 -32- 4101 -0000 11,575.96 0.00 FULL -TIME REGULAR 101 -32- 4102 -0000 389.69 0.00 OVERTIME 101 -32- 4105 -0000 312.00 0.00 STREET PAGER PAY 101 -32- 4121 -0000 920.83 0.00 PERA CONTRIB - CITY SHARE 101 -32- 4122 -0000 903.86 0.00 FICA CONTRIB - CITY SHARE 101 -32- 4131 -0000 2,220.86 0.00 EMPLOYEE INSURANCE - CITY 101 -32- 4151 -0000 809.19 0.00 WORKERS COMPENSATION 101 -33- 4101 -0000 55.56 0.00 FULL -TIME REGULAR 101 -33- 4121 -0000 4.16 0.00 PERA CONTRIB - CITY SHARE 101 -33- 4122 -0000 3.66 0.00 FICA CONTRIB - CITY SHARE PR - G/L Distribution Report (05/14/2018 - 2:34 PM) Page 1 Account Number Debit Amount Credit Amount Description 101 -33- 4151 -0000 1.36 0.00 WORKERS COMPENSATION 101 -52- 4101 -0000 4,664.76 0.00 FULL -TIME REGULAR 101 -52- 4103 -0000 88.00 0.00 PART -TIME 101 -52- 4121 -0000 349.85 0.00 PERA CONTRIB - CITY SHARE 101 -52- 4122 -0000 387.33 0.00 FICA CONTRIB - CITY SHARE 101 -52- 4131 -0000 1,180.24 0.00 EMPLOYEE INSURANCE - CITY 101 -52- 4151 -0000 295.13 0.00 WORKERS COMPENSATION 101 -53- 4101 -0000 930.18 0.00 FULL -TIME REGULAR 101 -53- 4121 -0000 69.74 0.00 PERA CONTRIB - CITY SHARE 101 -53- 4122 -0000 69.97 0.00 FICA CONTRIB - CITY SHARE 101 -53- 4131 -0000 22.69 0.00 EMPLOYEE INSURANCE - CITY 101 -53- 4151 -0000 43.63 0.00 WORKERS COMPENSATION FUND Total: 57,502.27 57,502.27 FUND 201 Southshore Center 6,069.92 CASH AND INVESTMENTS 201 -00- 1010 -0000 0.00 2,184.62 CASH AND INVESTMENTS 201 -00- 4101 -0000 1,002.10 0.00 FULL -TIME REGULAR 201 -00- 4102 -0000 202.44 0.00 OVERTIME 201 -00- 4103 -0000 712.21 0.00 PART -TIME 201 -00- 4121 -0000 75.16 0.00 PERA CONTRIB - CITY SHARE 201 -00- 4122 -0000 125.51 0.00 FICA CONTRIB - CITY SHARE 201 -00- 4151 -0000 67.20 0.00 WORKERS COMPENSATION FUND Total: 2,184.62 2,184.62 FUND 601 Water Utility 601 -00- 1010 -0000 0.00 7,383.61 CASH AND INVESTMENTS 601 -00- 4101 -0000 5,668.53 0.00 FULL -TIME REGULAR 601 -00- 4102 -0000 140.40 0.00 OVERTIME 601 -00- 4121 -0000 435.71 0.00 PERA CONTRIB - CITY SHARE 601 -00- 4122 -0000 381.09 0.00 FICA CONTRIB - CITY SHARE 601 -00- 4131 -0000 617.69 0.00 EMPLOYEE INSURANCE - CITY 601 -00- 4151 -0000 140.19 0.00 WORKERS COMPENSATION FUND Total: 7,383.61 7,383.61 FUND 611 Sanitary Sewer Utility 611 -00- 1010 -0000 0.00 6,069.92 CASH AND INVESTMENTS 611 -00- 4101 -0000 4,546.00 0.00 FULL -TIME REGULAR 611 -00- 4102 -0000 140.40 0.00 OVERTIME 611 -00- 4121 -0000 351.48 0.00 PERA CONTRIB - CITY SHARE 611 -00- 4122 -0000 316.28 0.00 FICA CONTRIB - CITY SHARE 611 -00- 4131 -0000 617.69 0.00 EMPLOYEE INSURANCE - CITY 611 -00- 4151 -0000 98.07 0.00 WORKERS COMPENSATION PR - G/L Distribution Report (05/14/2018 - 2:34 PM) Page 2 Account Number Debit Amount Credit Amount Description FUND Total: 6,069.92 6,069.92 FUND 621 Recycling Utility 621 -00- 1010 -0000 0.00 543.23 CASH AND INVESTMENTS 621 -00- 4101 -0000 404.64 0.00 FULL -TIME REGULAR 621 -00- 4121 -0000 30.35 0.00 PERA CONTRIB - CITY SHARE 621 -00- 4122 -0000 28.97 0.00 FICA CONTRIB - CITY SHARE 621 -00- 4131 -0000 75.60 0.00 EMPLOYEE INSURANCE - CITY 621 -00- 4151 -0000 3.67 0.00 WORKERS COMPENSATION FUND Total: 543.23 543.23 FUND 631 Storm Water Utility 631 -00- 1010 -0000 0.00 911.79 CASH AND INVESTMENTS 631 -00- 4101 -0000 736.88 0.00 FULL -TIME REGULAR 631 -00- 4121 -0000 55.25 0.00 PERA CONTRIB - CITY SHARE 631 -00- 4122 -0000 52.45 0.00 FICA CONTRIB - CITY SHARE 631 -00- 4131 -0000 50.70 0.00 EMPLOYEE INSURANCE - CITY 631 -00- 4151 -0000 16.51 0.00 WORKERS COMPENSATION FUND Total: 911.79 911.79 FUND 700 Payroll Clearing Fund 700 -00- 1010 -0000 74,595.44 0.00 CASH AND INVESTMENTS 700 -00- 2170 -0000 0.00 37,154.64 GROSS PAYROLL CLEARING 700 -00- 2171 -0000 0.00 7,826.31 HEALTH INSURANCE PAYABLE 700 -00- 2172 -0000 0.00 4,043.79 FEDERAL WITHHOLDING PAYABLE 700 -00- 2173 -0000 0.00 2,191.88 STATE WITHHOLDING PAYABLE 700 -00- 2174 -0000 0.00 8,270.18 FICA/MEDICARE TAX PAYABLE 700 -00- 2175 -0000 0.00 7,553.30 PERA WITHHOLDING PAYABLE 700 -00- 2176 -0000 0.00 3,223.24 DEFERRED COMPENSATION 700 -00- 2177 -0000 0.00 1,675.86 WORKERS COMPENSATION 700 -00- 2181 -0000 0.00 1,181.20 DISABILITY INSURANCE 700 -00- 2183 -0000 0.00 548.84 HEALTH SAVINGS ACCOUNT 700 -00- 2184 -0000 0.00 502.20 DENTAL DELTA 700 -00- 2185 -0000 0.00 424.00 DENTAL - UNION FUND Total: 74,595.44 74,595.44 Report Total: 149,190.88 149,190.88 PR - G/L Distribution Report (05/14/2018 - 2:34 PM) Page 3 Accounts Payable Computer Check Proof List by Vendor User: mnguyen Printed: 05/16/2018 - 12:11PM Batch: 00003.05.2018 - PR -05 -14 -2018 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference Vendor: 4 AFSCME CO 5 MEMBER HEALTH FUND Check Sequence: 1 ACH Enabled: True May -2018 PR Batch 00002.05.2018 Dental - Union 424.00 05/14/2018 700 -00- 2185 -0000 PR Batch 00002.05.2018 Dental - Union Check Total: 424.00 Vendor: 928 MATT & JOCELYN BERBEE Check Sequence: 2 ACH Enabled: False StormwaterRefun Stormwater Management Refund -6170 Deer Rid 602.45 05/15/2018 631 -00- 1150 -0000 Check Total: 602.45 Vendor: 927 TODD & MARY BERTELSON Check Sequence: 3 ACH Enabled: False StormwaterRefun Stormwater Management Refund -6155 Deer Rid 496.61 05/15/2018 631 -00- 1150 -0000 Check Total: 496.61 Vendor: 926 SARAH & BRIAN CAMPELL Check Sequence: 4 ACH Enabled: False StormwaterRefun Stormwater Management Refund -6150 Deer Rid 248.91 05/15/2018 631 -00- 1150 -0000 Check Total: 248.91 Vendor: 3 DELTA DENTAL OF MINNESOTA Check Sequence: 5 ACH Enabled: True May -2018 PR Batch 00002.05.2018 Dental - Non Union 502.20 05/14/2018 700 -00- 2184 -0000 PR Batch 00002.05.2018 Dental - Non Uni May- 2018 -COBRA COBRA- Jean Panchyshyn 44.55 05/14/2018 700 -00- 2184 -0000 PR Batch 00002.05.2018 Dental - Non Uni Check Total: 546.75 Vendor: 5 EFTPS - FEDERAL W/H Check Sequence: 6 ACH Enabled: True 05 -14- 2018 -Joe PR Batch 00002.05.2018 Federal Income Tax - 190.42 05/14/2018 700 -00- 2172 -0000 PR Batch 00002.05.2018 Federal Income I 05 -14- 2018 -Joe PR Batch 00002.05.2018 FICA Employee Portio - 143.56 05/14/2018 700 -00- 2174 -0000 05 -14- 2018 -Joe PR Batch 00002.05.2018 FICA Employer Portioj - 143.56 05/14/2018 700 -00- 2174 -0000 PR Batch 00002.05.2018 Federal Income I 05 -14- 2018 -Joe PR Batch 00002.05.2018 Medicare Employee Pc -33.57 05/14/2018 700 -00- 2174 -0000 PR Batch 00002.05.2018 Federal Income I 05 -14- 2018 -Joe PR Batch 00002.05.2018 Medicare Employer Po -33.57 05/14/2018 700 -00- 2174 -0000 PR Batch 00002.05.2018 Federal Income I PR- 042718 -Joe PR Batch 00003.05.2018 FICA Employee Portio 16.17 05/15/2018 700 -00- 2174 -0000 PR Batch 00003.05.2018 FICA Employee _ PR- 042718 -Joe PR Batch 00003.05.2018 FICA Employer Portioj 16.17 05/15/2018 700 -00- 2174 -0000 PR Batch 00003.05.2018 FICA Employer ] AP- Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (05/16/2018 - 12:11 PM) Page 1 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference PR- 042718 -Joe PR Batch 00003.05.2018 Medicare Employee Pc 3.78 05/15/2018 700 -00- 2174 -0000 PR Batch 00003.05.2018 Medicare Emplo,. PR- 042718 -Joe PR Batch 00003.05.2018 Medicare Employer Po 3.78 05/15/2018 700 -00- 2174 -0000 PR Batch 00003.05.2018 Medicare Emplo,. PR- 042718 -Joe PR Batch 00003.05.2018 FICA Employee Portio - 165.12 05/15/2018 700 -00- 2174 -0000 PR Batch 00003.05.2018 FICA Employee _ PR- 042718 -Joe PR Batch 00003.05.2018 FICA Employer Portioj - 165.12 05/15/2018 700 -00- 2174 -0000 PR Batch 00003.05.2018 FICA Employee _ PR- 042718 -Joe PR Batch 00003.05.2018 Medicare Employee Pc -38.62 05/15/2018 700 -00- 2174 -0000 PR Batch 00003.05.2018 FICA Employee _ PR- 042718 -Joe PR Batch 00003.05.2018 Medicare Employer Po -38.62 05/15/2018 700 -00- 2174 -0000 PR Batch 00003.05.2018 FICA Employee _ PR- 042718 -Joe PR Batch 00003.05.2018 Federal Income Tax - 299.73 05/15/2018 700 -00- 2172 -0000 PR Batch 00003.05.2018 FICA Employee _ PR -05 -14 -2018 PR Batch 00002.05.2018 Federal Income Tax 4,043.79 05/14/2018 700 -00- 2172 -0000 PR Batch 00002.05.2018 Federal Income I PR -05 -14 -2018 PR Batch 00002.05.2018 FICA Employee Portio 3,351.31 05/14/2018 700 -00- 2174 -0000 PR Batch 00002.05.2018 FICA Employee _ PR -05 -14 -2018 PR Batch 00002.05.2018 FICA Employer Portioj 3,351.31 05/14/2018 700 -00- 2174 -0000 PR Batch 00002.05.2018 FICA Employer ] PR -05 -14 -2018 PR Batch 00002.05.2018 Medicare Employee Pc 783.78 05/14/2018 700 -00- 2174 -0000 PR Batch 00002.05.2018 Medicare Emplo,. PR -05 -14 -2018 PR Batch 00002.05.2018 Medicare Employer Po 783.78 05/14/2018 700 -00- 2174 -0000 PR Batch 00002.05.2018 Medicare Emplo,. PR- 051418 -Joe PR Batch 00004.05.2018 FICA Employee Portio 11.90 05/15/2018 700 -00- 2174 -0000 PR Batch 00004.05.2018 FICA Employee _ PR- 051418 -Joe PR Batch 00004.05.2018 FICA Employer Portioj 11.90 05/15/2018 700 -00- 2174 -0000 PR Batch 00004.05.2018 FICA Employer ] PR- 051418 -Joe PR Batch 00004.05.2018 Medicare Employee Pc 2.78 05/15/2018 700 -00- 2174 -0000 PR Batch 00004.05.2018 Medicare Emplo,. PR- 051418 -Joe PR Batch 00004.05.2018 Medicare Employer Po 2.78 05/15/2018 700 -00- 2174 -0000 PR Batch 00004.05.2018 Medicare Emplo,. Check Total: 11,131.34 Vendor: 930 STEVEN HALL Check Sequence: 7 ACH Enabled: False StormwaterRefun Stormwater Management Refund -6195 Deer Rid 496.61 05/15/2018 631 -00- 1150 -0000 Check Total: 496.61 Vendor: 6 HEALTH PARTNERS -GROUP Check Sequence: 8 ACH Enabled: False May -2018 PR Batch 00002.05.2018 Health Ins - CoPay 2,393.15 05/14/2018 700 -00- 2171 -0000 PR Batch 00002.05.2018 Health Ins - Cop; May -2018 PR Batch 00002.05.2018 Health Insurance -HSA 5,433.16 05/14/2018 700 -00- 2171 -0000 PR Batch 00002.05.2018 Health Insurance May -2018 PR Batch 00001.05.2018 Health Ins - CoPay 2,393.15 04/27/2018 700 -00- 2171 -0000 PR Batch 00001.05.2018 Health Ins - Cop; May -2018 PR Batch 00001.05.2018 Health Insurance -HSA 5,433.16 04/27/2018 700 -00- 2171 -0000 PR Batch 00001.05.2018 Health Insurance May- 2018 -Bruce COBRA - Bruce DeJong 1,744.43 04/27/2018 700 -00- 2171 -0000 PR Batch 00001.05.2018 Health Insurance May- 2018 -Jean COBRA - Jean Panchyshyn 631.26 04/27/2018 700 -00- 2171 -0000 PR Batch 00001.05.2018 Health Insurance PR- 042718 -Joe PR Batch 00003.05.2018 Health Insurance -HSA 480.01 05/15/2018 700 -00- 2171 -0000 PR Batch 00003.05.2018 Health Insurance PR- 042718 -Joe -P PR Batch 00003.05.2018 Health Insurance -HSA - 480.01 05/15/2018 700 -00- 2171 -0000 PR Batch 00003.05.2018 Health Insurance Check Total: 18,028.31 Vendor: 2 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST - 302131 -457 Check Sequence: 9 ACH Enabled: False PR -05 -14 -2018 PR Batch 00002.05.2018 Deferred Comp Flat Ai 3,065.00 05/14/2018 700 -00- 2176 -0000 PR Batch 00002.05.2018 Deferred Comp I PR -05 -14 -2018 PR Batch 00002.05.2018 Deferred Comp Percen 158.24 05/14/2018 700 -00- 2176 -0000 PR Batch 00002.05.2018 Deferred Comp I Check Total: 3,223.24 Vendor: 686 KANSAS CITY LIFE INSURANCE COMPAN' Check Sequence: 10 ACH Enabled: True May -2018 PR Batch 00002.05.2018 Long Term Disability 546.67 05/14/2018 700 -00- 2181 -0000 PR Batch 00002.05.2018 Long Term Disat AP- Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (05/16/2018 - 12:11 PM) Page 2 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference May -2018 PR Batch 00002.05.2018 Short Term Disability 634.53 05/14/2018 700 -00- 2181 -0000 PR Batch 00002.05.2018 Short Term Disat Check Total: 1,181.20 Vendor: 263 JOSEPH LUGOWSKI Check Sequence: 11 ACH Enabled: False 04- 27- 18- Payrol Pay Period 04/16/18 - 04/29/18 Refund 250.42 05/15/2018 101 -00- 3624 -0000 Check Total: 250.42 Vendor: 277 MEDTOX LABORATORIES, INC. Check Sequence: 12 ACH Enabled: False 012018504782 Drug Test 50.00 05/15/2018 101 -32- 4305 -0000 Check Total: 50.00 Vendor: 11 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE Check Sequence: 13 ACH Enabled: True 04 -27- 2018 -Joe PR Batch 00002.05.2018 State Income Tax - 126.15 05/14/2018 700 -00- 2173 -0000 PR Batch 00002.05.2018 State Income Tax 05 -14- 2018 -Joe PR Batch 00002.05.2018 State Income Tax - 103.06 05/14/2018 700 -00- 2173 -0000 PR Batch 00002.05.2018 State Income Tax PR -05 -14 -2018 PR Batch 00002.05.2018 State Income Tax 2,191.88 05/14/2018 700 -00- 2173 -0000 PR Batch 00002.05.2018 State Income Tax Check Total: 1,962.67 Vendor: 665 OPTUM BANK Check Sequence: 14 ACH Enabled: True PR- 042718 -Joe PR Batch 00003.05.2018 HSA - OPTUM BANK 128.84 05/15/2018 700 -00- 2183 -0000 PR Batch 00003.05.2018 HSA - OPTUM B. PR- 042718 -Joe -P PR Batch 00003.05.2018 HSA - OPTUM BANK - 128.84 05/15/2018 700 -00- 2183 -0000 PR Batch 00003.05.2018 HSA - OPTUM B. PR -05 -14 -2018 PR Batch 00002.05.2018 HSA - OPTUM BANK 548.84 05/14/2018 700 -00- 2183 -0000 PR Batch 00002.05.2018 HSA - OPTUM B. Check Total: 548.84 Vendor: 9 PERA Check Sequence: 15 ACH Enabled: True 05 -14- 2018 -Joe PR Batch 00002.05.2018 MN -PERA Deduction - 162.24 05/14/2018 700 -00- 2175 -0000 PR Batch 00002.05.2018 MN -PERA Dedu 05 -14- 2018 -Joe PR Batch 00002.05.2018 MN PERA Benefit Em - 187.20 05/14/2018 700 -00- 2175 -0000 PR Batch 00002.05.2018 MN -PERA Dedu PR- 042718 -Joe PR Batch 00003.05.2018 MN -PERA Deduction 26.36 05/15/2018 700 -00- 2175 -0000 PR Batch 00003.05.2018 MN -PERA Dedu PR- 042718 -Joe PR Batch 00003.05.2018 MN PERA Benefit Em 30.42 05/15/2018 700 -00- 2175 -0000 PR Batch 00003.05.2018 MN PERA Benel PR- 042718 -Joe PR Batch 00003.05.2018 MN PERA Benefit Em - 210.60 05/15/2018 700 -00- 2175 -0000 PR Batch 00003.05.2018 MN PERA Benel PR- 042718 -Joe PR Batch 00003.05.2018 MN -PERA Deduction - 182.52 05/15/2018 700 -00- 2175 -0000 PR Batch 00003.05.2018 MN PERA Benel PR -05 -14 -2018 PR Batch 00002.05.2018 MN -PERA Deduction 3,506.88 05/14/2018 700 -00- 2175 -0000 PR Batch 00002.05.2018 MN -PERA Dedu PR -05 -14 -2018 PR Batch 00002.05.2018 MN PERA Benefit Em 4,046.42 05/14/2018 700 -00- 2175 -0000 PR Batch 00002.05.2018 MN PERA Benel PR- 051418 -Joe PR Batch 00004.05.2018 MN -PERA Deduction 24.21 05/15/2018 700 -00- 2175 -0000 PR Batch 00004.05.2018 MN -PERA Dedu PR- 051418 -Joe PR Batch 00004.05.2018 MN PERA Benefit Em 27.94 05/15/2018 700 -00- 2175 -0000 PR Batch 00004.05.2018 MN PERA Benel Check Total: 6,919.67 Vendor: 332 PETTY CASH Check Sequence: 16 ACH Enabled: False 2018- SpringClea 2018 - Spring Clean up 300.00 05/15/2018 621 -00- 3732 -0000 AP- Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (05/16/2018 - 12:11 PM) Page 3 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference Check Total: Vendor: 929 THOMAS TURNER StormwaterRefun Stormwater Management Refund -6175 Deer Rid Check Total: Total for Check Run: Total of Number of Checks: AP- Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (05/16/2018 - 12:11 PM) Check Sequence: 17 496.61 05/15/2018 631 -00- 1150 -0000 496.61 46,907.63 !1/ ACH Enabled: False Page 4 Accounts Payable Computer Check Proof List by Vendor User: mnguyen Printed: 05/23/2018 - 1:59PM Batch: 00004.05.2018 - CC -05 -29 -2018 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference Vendor: 102 ABDO SICK & MEYERS LLP Check Sequence: 1 ACH Enabled: False 399538 2017 Certified Audit 7,300.00 05/29/2018 101 -16- 4301 -0000 Check Total: 7,300.00 Vendor: 887 ADVANCED ENGINEERING & ENVIRONMI Check Sequence: 2 ACH Enabled: False 57963 Boulder Bridge Well MCC Replacement 5,748.00 05/29/2018 601 -00- 4680 -0000 Check Total: 5,748.00 Vendor: 877 BB &T GOVERNMENTAL FINANCE Check Sequence: 3 ACH Enabled: False 2017A -EDA- 051118 City Hall Impv- 2017A- INTEREST 11,947.51 05/29/2018 310 -00- 4711 -0000 Check Total: 11,947.51 Vendor: UB *00167 Robert & Kathryn Bean Check Sequence: 4 ACH Enabled: False Refund Check 9.33 05/22/2018 601 -00- 2010 -0000 Refund Check 10.89 05/22/2018 611 -00- 2010 -0000 Refund Check 4.66 05/22/2018 631 -00- 2010 -0000 Refund Check 4.67 05/22/2018 621 -00- 2010 -0000 Check Total: 29.55 Vendor: 137 CENTURY LINK Check Sequence: 5 ACH Enabled: False 612E451785 -MA18 612 -E45- 1785 -Bldr Brdg 294.00 05/29/2018 601 -00- 4396 -0000 612E458019 -MA18 612 -E45- 8019 -SE Areas 220.50 05/29/2018 601 -00- 4398 -0000 Check Total: 514.50 Vendor: 150 CLASSIC CLEANING COMPANY Check Sequence: 6 ACH Enabled: False 26617 City Hall Monthly Svc 495.00 05/29/2018 101 -19- 4400 -0000 26618 Public Works Monthly Svc 295.00 05/29/2018 101 -32- 4400 -0000 Check Total: 790.00 AP- Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (05/23/2018 - 1:59 PM) Page 1 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference Vendor: UB *00171 Dwight & Carol Clement Check Sequence: 7 ACH Enabled: False Refund Check 71.34 05/22/2018 611 -00- 2010 -0000 Refund Check 30.58 05/22/2018 631 -00- 2010 -0000 Refund Check 30.57 05/22/2018 621 -00- 2010 -0000 Check Total: 132.49 Vendor: 573 COMPASS MINERALS AMERICA Check Sequence: 8 ACH Enabled: False 258505 Ice & Salt 4,257.18 05/29/2018 101 -33- 4245 -0000 Check Total: 4,257.18 Vendor: 167 ECM PUBLISHERS INC Check Sequence: 9 ACH Enabled: True 597796 Seal Coat Project BIDS - Ads 416.50 05/29/2018 404 -00- 4620 -0006 Check Total: 416.50 Vendor: 513 ECONO SIGNS, LLC. Check Sequence: 10 ACH Enabled: False 10- 944753 Signs 171.20 05/29/2018 101 -32- 4245 -0000 Check Total: 171.20 Vendor: 219 ELLY PIEPER Check Sequence: 11 ACH Enabled: False 05 -08 -2018 SSC- Tablecloths 12.00 05/29/2018 201 -00- 4400 -0000 Check Total: 12.00 Vendor: 187 FINANCE AND COMMERCE, INC. Check Sequence: 12 ACH Enabled: True 743771587 Seal Coat Project - BIDS - Ads 265.57 05/29/2018 404 -00- 4620 -0006 Check Total: 265.57 Vendor: UB *00174 HANSWELL Property, LLC Check Sequence: 13 ACH Enabled: False Refund Check 21.94 05/22/2018 611 -00- 2010 -0000 Refund Check 9.40 05/22/2018 631 -00- 2010 -0000 Refund Check 9.40 05/22/2018 621 -00- 2010 -0000 Check Total: 40.74 Vendor: 216 HENNEPIN COUNTY - RECORDER/REGISTI Check Sequence: 14 ACH Enabled: False 165896 -1804 EASE Record - User ID - EGQA69 77.50 05/29/2018 101 -31- 4400 -0000 Check Total: 77.50 Vendor: 896 HUEBSCH SERVICES Check Sequence: 15 ACH Enabled: True AP- Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (05/23/2018 - 1:59 PM) Page 2 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 4076866 SSCC Mats 32.00 05/29/2018 201 -00- 4400 -0000 4076866 City Hall Mats 83.15 05/29/2018 101 -19- 4400 -0000 Check Total: 115.15 Vendor: UB *00170 Jeffrey & Jennifer Kohrman Check Sequence: 16 ACH Enabled: False Refund Check 177.21 05/22/2018 611 -00- 2010 -0000 Refund Check 93.10 05/22/2018 631 -00- 2010 -0000 Refund Check 126.23 05/22/2018 621 -00- 2010 -0000 Check Total: 396.54 Vendor: 251 LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISI Check Sequence: 17 ACH Enabled: True 2nd Qtr- 2018 -Levy Quarterly Levy Payment 7,877.25 05/14/2018 101 -11- 4433 -0000 Check Total: 7,877.25 Vendor: 931 LINE 1 PARTNERS, INC. Check Sequence: 18 ACH Enabled: False 20494 DataPort - CityHall 115.00 05/29/2018 101 -19- 4221 -0000 Check Total: 115.00 Vendor: 431 MID AMERICA METER, INC. Check Sequence: 19 ACH Enabled: False 017 -0792 Water Meter Testing 449.00 05/29/2018 601 -00- 4400 -0000 Check Total: 449.00 Vendor: UB *00168 Suzanne & Ryan Neslund Check Sequence: 20 ACH Enabled: False Refund Check 45.86 05/22/2018 601 -00- 2010 -0000 Refund Check 53.50 05/22/2018 611 -00- 2010 -0000 Refund Check 22.93 05/22/2018 631 -00- 2010 -0000 Refund Check 22.93 05/22/2018 621 -00- 2010 -0000 Check Total: 145.22 Vendor: UB *00173 Jamie Nolan Check Sequence: 21 ACH Enabled: False Refund Check 12.78 05/22/2018 601 -00- 2010 -0000 Refund Check 7.22 05/22/2018 621 -00- 2010 -0000 Check Total: 20.00 Vendor: 808 NORTHERN SAFETY & INDUSTRIAL Check Sequence: 22 ACH Enabled: True 902944046 Safe Grip Powder Latex Gloves 247.88 05/29/2018 101 -32- 4245 -0000 AP- Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (05/23/2018 - 1:59 PM) Page 3 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference Check Total: 247.88 Vendor: 320 NORTHLAND TRUST SERVICES Check Sequence: 23 ACH Enabled: True SHOREI3A- 05072011 General Obligation- Series2013A- Interest 6,681.25 05/29/2018 601 -00- 4711 -0000 SHOREI3A -Gen Obligation Water Check Total: 6,681.25 Vendor: 325 ON SITE SANITATION -TWIN CITIES Check Sequence: 24 ACH Enabled: True 582017 Freeman Park -6000 Eureka Rd 70.44 05/29/2018 101 -52- 4410 -0000 586476 Badger Pk-5745 Country Club Rd 61.56 05/29/2018 101 -52- 4410 -0000 586477 Cathcart Park -26655 W- 62nd ST 61.56 05/29/2018 101 -52- 4410 -0000 586478 Freeman Park -6000 Eureka Rd 184.68 05/29/2018 101 -52- 4410 -0000 586479 Silverwood Pk -5755 Covington R 61.56 05/29/2018 101 -52- 4410 -0000 586480 SS Skate -5355 St Albans Bay Rd 61.56 05/29/2018 101 -52- 4410 -0000 586481 Christmas Lk Rd -5625 Merry Ln 226.80 05/29/2018 101 -52- 4410 -0000 Check Total: 728.16 Vendor: 933 OVERLINE & SON, INC. Check Sequence: 25 ACH Enabled: False 634 Clean & TV Sewer Svcs 3,625.00 05/29/2018 611 -00- 4680 -0000 Check Total: 3,625.00 Vendor: UB *00169 Keith & Mary Pickering Check Sequence: 26 ACH Enabled: False Refund Check 18.30 05/22/2018 631 -00- 2010 -0000 Check Total: 18.30 Vendor: UB *00172 Keith & Mary Pickering Check Sequence: 27 ACH Enabled: False Refund Check 18.30 05/22/2018 631 -00- 2010 -0000 Check Total: 18.30 Vendor: 685 BRENDA PRICCO Check Sequence: 28 ACH Enabled: True Mar -May- 2018 -Mile Mileage Reimbursement - March to May 258.19 05/29/2018 101 -13- 4331 -0000 Check Total: 258.19 Vendor: 932 PRO -TREE OUTDOOR SERVICES, LLC Check Sequence: 29 ACH Enabled: False 1833 Tree Removal 445.00 05/29/2018 101 -32- 4400 -0000 Check Total: 445.00 Vendor: UB *00166 Steven Quinlan Check Sequence: 30 ACH Enabled: False AP- Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (05/23/2018 - 1:59 PM) Page 4 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference AP- Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (05/23/2018 - 1:59 PM) Page 5 Refund Check 41.42 05/22/2018 601 -00- 2010 -0000 Refund Check 48.32 05/22/2018 611 -00- 2010 -0000 Refund Check 20.71 05/22/2018 631 -00- 2010 -0000 Refund Check 20.71 05/22/2018 621 -00- 2010 -0000 Check Total: 131.16 Vendor: 345 SAFEASSURE CONSULTANTS, INC. Check Sequence: 31 ACH Enabled: False 1376 Safety Consult & Plan 3,139.05 05/29/2018 101 -32- 4400 -0000 Check Total: 3,139.05 Vendor: 355 SHRED -N -GO INC Check Sequence: 32 ACH Enabled: False 78889 Shredded Svc 35.83 05/29/2018 101 -13- 4400 -0000 79027 Spring Cleanup - Shredded Svc 950.00 05/29/2018 621 -00- 3732 -0000 Check Total: 985.83 Vendor: UB *00175 Jeffrey Solum Check Sequence: 33 ACH Enabled: False Refund Check 18.99 05/22/2018 601 -00- 2010 -0000 Check Total: 18.99 Vendor: 360 SOUTH LAKE MINNETONKA POLICE DEPA Check Sequence: 34 ACH Enabled: False 1st "r- 2018 -CO Quarterly -Court Overtime 1,160.96 05/14/2018 101 -21- 4440 -0000 April- 2018 -HCPF Monthly -Henn Cry Process Fee 75.00 05/29/2018 101 -21- 4400 -0000 June - 2018 -013 Monthly- Operating Budget Exp 102,886.08 05/14/2018 101 -21- 4400 -0000 Check Total: 104,122.04 Vendor: 388 UNIQUE PAVING MATERIALS CORP. Check Sequence: 35 ACH Enabled: True 35933 Cold Mix 913.75 05/29/2018 101 -32- 4250 -0000 Check Total: 913.75 Vendor: 421 VERIZON WIRELESS Check Sequence: 36 ACH Enabled: False 9806410220 Sewer & Water - Acct842017386 48.70 05/29/2018 601 -00- 4321 -0000 Acct #842017386 -00001 9806410220 Sewer & Water - Acct842017386 48.70 05/29/2018 611 -00- 4321 -0000 Acct #842017386 -00001 9806410220 Sewer & Water - Acct842017386 48.70 05/29/2018 631 -00- 4321 -0000 Acct #842017386 -00001 Check Total: 146.10 Vendor: 415 WARNER CONNECT Check Sequence: 37 ACH Enabled: True 29936140 Additional Services Charge 337.50 05/14/2018 101 -19- 4321 -0000 29936226 Monthly Main Svc 2,768.65 05/14/2018 101 -19- 4321 -0000 AP- Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (05/23/2018 - 1:59 PM) Page 5 Invoice No 29936252 Description Additional Services Charge Check Total: Total for Check Run: Total of Number of Checks: Amount Payment Date Acct Number 162.24 05/29/2018 101 -19- 4321 -0000 3,268.39 165,568.29 37 Reference AP- Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (05/23/2018 - 1:59 PM) Page 6 2D MEETING TYPE City of Shorewood Council Meeting Item Regular Meeting Title / Subject: Resolution 18 -XX; Annual Review and Update of City Data Practices Policies Meeting Date: Tuesday, May 29, 2018 Prepared by: Sandie Thone, City Clerk Reviewed by: Greg Lerud, City Administrator Attachments: Resolution Policy Consideration: Annual Review and Update of Data Practices Policies as required by MN State Statutes Section §13.025 and Section §13.03 Background: Minnesota State Statutes, sections 13.025, subdivisions 2 and 3, require government entities to prepare written policies that relate to public access to government data, and rights of subjects of data and Minnesota State Statutes, section 13.03, subdivision 2 requires entities to establish procedures that data requests are complied with appropriately and promptly. Minnesota State Statute §13.025, subdivision 2, specifically requires that the Data Practices Responsible Authority shall prepare a written data access policy and update it no later than August 1 of each year, and at any other time as necessary to reflect changes in personnel, procedures, or other circumstances that impact the public's ability to access data. The attached policies for the City of Shorewood: Data Practices Policy for Data Subjects and Data Practices Policy for Members of the Public reflect the most current and relevant information and have been updated to include the most recent changes in personnel and appointments. Approval of these policies will satisfy the government entity annual update obligations and requirements for the year 2018 pursuant to MN state law. Financial or Budget Considerations: None Recommendation / Action Requested: Staff respectfully recommends the city council approve the City of Shorewood Data Practices Policy for Data Subjects and Data Practices Policy for Members of the Public satisfying the government entity annual update obligations and requirements on or before August 1 for the year 2018 pursuant to MN state law. Motion, second and simple majority vote required. Connection to Vision / Mission: Consistency in providing quality public services. Mission Statement: The City of Shorewood is committed to providing residents quality public services, a healthy environment, a variety of attractive amenities, a sustainable tax base, and sound financial management through effective, efficient, and visionary leadership. Page 1 CITY OF SHOREWOOD COUNTY OF HENNEPIN STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 18 -XX 2018 DATA PRACTICES POLICIES WHEREAS, Minnesota State Statutes, sections 13.025, subdivisions 2 and 3, require government entities to prepare written policies that relate to public access to government data, and rights of subjects of data and Minnesota State Statutes, section 13.03, subdivision 2 requires entities to establish procedures that data requests are complied with appropriately and promptly; and WHEREAS, Minnesota State Statute § 13.025, subdivision 2, specifically requires that the Data Practices Responsible Authority shall prepare a written data access policy and update it no later than August 1 of each year, and at any other time as necessary to reflect changes in personnel, procedures, or other circumstances that impact the public's ability to access data; and WHEREAS, the City of Shorewood and the Responsible Authority have successfully created and updated the following policies: Data Practices Policy for Data Subjects and Data Practices Policy for Members of the Public which reflect the most current and relevant information and have been updated to include the most recent changes in personnel and appointments; and WHEREAS, approval of these policies will satisfy the government entity annual update obligations and requirements for the year 2018 pursuant to MN state law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Shorewood, the City of Shorewood Data Practices Policy for Data Subjects and Data Practices Policy for Members of the Public are approved. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Shorewood this 29th day of May, 2018. ATTEST: Sandie Thone, City Clerk Scott Zerby, Mayor Data Practices Policy for Members of the Public City of Shorewood Hennepin County, Minnesota City of Shorewood Annual Review and Update Dated 5/29/2018 Policy and procedures required by Minnesota Statutes, sections 13.025 and 13.03 Right to access public data The Government Data Practices Act (Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13) presumes that all government data are public unless a state or federal law says the data are not public. Government data is a term that means all recorded information a government entity has, including paper, email, flash drives, CDs, DVDs, photographs, etc. The Government Data Practices Act also provides that this government entity must keep all government data in a way that makes it easy for you, as a member of the public, to access public data. You have the right to look at (inspect), free of charge, all public data that we keep. You also have the right to get copies of public data. The Government Data Practices Act allows us to charge for copies. You have the right to look at data, free of charge, before deciding to request copies. How to make a data request You can look at data, or request copies of data that this government entity keeps. Make your written request for data to the appropriate individual listed in the Data Practices Contacts on page 4. You may make your request via email, fax, mail, or in person using the form on page 6. If you choose not use to use the data request form, your request should include: • You are making a request for public data under the Government Data Practices Act (Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13). • Whether you would like to inspect the data, have copies of the data, or both. • A clear description of the data you would like to inspect or have copied. This government entity cannot require you, as a member of the public, to identify yourself or explain the reason for your data request. However, depending on how you want us to process your request (if, for example, you want us to mail you copies of data), we may need some information about you. If you choose not to give us any identifying information, we will provide you with contact information so you may check on the status of your request. In addition, please keep in mind that if we do not understand your request and have no way to contact you, we will not be able to begin processing your request. How we respond to a data request Upon receiving your request, we will work to process it. • If it is not clear what data you are requesting, we will ask you for clarification. • If we do not have the data, we will notify you in writing within 10 business days. • If we have the data, but the data are not public, we will notify you as soon as reasonably possible and state which specific law says the data are not public. • If we have the data, and the data are public, we will respond to your request appropriately and promptly, within a reasonable amount of time by doing one of the following: o Arrange a date, time, and place to inspect data, for free, if your request is to look at the data, or City of Shorewood Annual Review and Update Dated 5/29/2018 Policy and procedures required by Minnesota Statutes, sections 13.025 and 13.03 o Provide you with copies of the data as soon as reasonably possible. You may choose to pick up your copies, or we will mail or fax them to you. We will provide electronic copies (such as email or CD -ROM) upon request if we keep the data in electronic format. Information about copy charges is on page 5. We will provide notice to you about our requirement to prepay for copies. If you do not understand some of the data (technical terminology, abbreviations, or acronyms), please let us know. We will give you an explanation if you ask. The Government Data Practices Act does not require us to create or collect new data in response to a data request if we do not already have the data, or to provide data in a specific form or arrangement if we do not keep the data in that form or arrangement (for example, if the data you request are on paper only, we are not required to create electronic documents to respond to your request). If we agree to create data in response to your request, we will work with you on the details of your request, including cost and response time. In addition, we are not required under the Government Data Practices Act to respond to questions that are not specific requests for data. Requests for summary data Summary data are statistical records or reports that are prepared by removing all identifiers from private or confidential data on individuals. The preparation of summary data is not a means to gain access to private or confidential data. We will prepare summary data if you make request in writing and pre -pay for the cost of creating the data. Upon receiving your written request — you may use the data request form on page 6 — we will respond within ten business days with the data or details of when the data will be ready and how much we will charge. City of Shorewood Annual Review and Update Dated 5/29/2018 Policy and procedures required by Minnesota Statutes, sections 13.025 and 13.03 Data Practices Contacts Responsible Authority Name: Sandie Thone, City Clerk Address: City of Shorewood, 5755 Country Club Road, Shorewood, MN 55331 Phone number /fax number /email address: Phone: 952 - 960 -7900, Fax: 952 - 474 -0128, Email: sthone @ci.shorewood.mn.us Data Practices Compliance Official Name: Sandie Thone, City Clerk Address: City of Shorewood, 5755 Country Club Road, Shorewood, MN 55331 Phone number /fax number /email address: Phone: 952 - 960 -7900, Fax: 952 - 474 -0128, Email: sthone @ci.shorewood.mn.us Data Practices Designee(s) 1) Name: Twila Grout, Administrative Assistant Address: City of Shorewood, 5755 Country Club Road, Shorewood, MN 55331 Phone number /fax number /email address: Phone: 952 - 960 -7900, Fax: 952 - 474 -0128, Email: tgrout @ci.shorewood.mn.us 2) Name: Brenda Pricco, Administrative Assistant Address: City of Shorewood, 5755 Country Club Road, Shorewood, MN 55331 Phone number /fax number /email address: Phone: 952 - 960 -7900, Fax: 952 - 474 -0128, Email: bpricco @ci.shorewood.mn.us City of Shorewood Annual Review and Update Dated 5/29/2018 Policy and procedures required by Minnesota Statutes, sections 13.025 and 13.03 4 Copy Costs — Members of the Public This government entity charges for copies of government data. These charges are authorized under Minnesota Statutes, section 13.03, subdivision 3(c). For 100 or fewer paper copies — 25 cents per page 100 or fewer pages of black and white, letter or legal size paper copies cost 25C for a one -sided copy, or 50C for a two -sided copy. Most other types of copies — actual cost The charge for most other types of copies, when a charge is not set by statute or rule, is the actual cost of searching for and retrieving the data, and making the copies or electronically transmitting the data (e.g. sending the data by email). In determining the actual cost of making copies, we factor in employee time, the cost of the materials onto which we are copying the data (paper, CD, DVD, etc.), and mailing costs (if any). If your request is for copies of data that we cannot reproduce ourselves, such as photographs, we will charge you the actual cost we must pay an outside vendor for the copies. If, because of the subject matter of your request, we find it necessary for a higher -paid employee to search for and retrieve the data, we will calculate the search and retrieval portion of the copy charge at the higher salary /wage. City of Shorewood Annual Review and Update Dated 5/29/2018 Policy and procedures required by Minnesota Statutes, sections 13.025 and 13.03 Data Request Form — Members of the Public Request date: I am requesting access to data in the following way: LL Inspection LL Copies LL Both inspection and copies Note: Inspection is free We will respond to your request as soon as reasonably possible. Contact information Name: Address /phone number /email address: Note: You do not have to provide any contact information. However, if you want us to mail /email you copies of data, we will need some type of contact information. In addition, if we do not understand your request and need to get clarification from you, without contact information we will not be able to begin processing your request until you contact us. These are the data I am requesting: Describe the data you are requesting as specifically as possible. City of Shorewood Annual Review and Update Dated 5/29/2018 Policy and procedures required by Minnesota Statutes, sections 13.025 and 13.03 Notice of Adoption of Model Policies Minnesota Statutes, section 13.025, subdivisions 2 and 3, require government entities to prepare written policies that relate to public access to government data, and rights of subjects of data and Minnesota Statutes, section 13.03, subdivision 2, requires entities to establish procedures so that data requests are complied with appropriately and promptly. Minnesota Statutes, section 13.073, subd. 6, requires the Commissioner of Administration to prepare model policies and procedures to help government entities comply with those requirements. Entities that choose to adopt the Commissioner's model policies must notify the Commissioner. Please use the following statement to notify the Commissioner if you choose to adopt the model policies and procedures.* Notice to Commissioner of Administration: Adoption of Model Policies The City of Shorewood has adopted the Commissioner's Model Policy for the Public and Model Policy for Data Subjects. This notice to the Commissioner satisfies the City of Shorewood's obligation under Minnesota Statutes, section 13.073, subdivision 6. Sandie Thone City Clerk and Data Practices Responsible Authority Adoption of Model Policy Notice to Commissioner of Administration Submitted May 8, 2017. *Government entities may submit this notification by mail or email: Commissioner of Administration c/o Information Policy Analysis Division (IPAD) 201 Administration Building 50 Sherburne Avenue St. Paul, MN 55155 info.ioad(@state.mn.us City of Shorewood Annual Review and Update Dated 5/29/2018 Policy and procedures required by Minnesota Statutes, sections 13.025 and 13.03 Data Practices Policy for Data Subjects City of Shorewood Hennepin County, Minnesota Data Practice Policy for Data Subjects Annual Review and Update Dated 5/29/2018 MN 13.025 and 13.03 Data about you The Government Data Practices Act (Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13) says that data subjects have certain rights related to a government entity collecting, creating, and keeping government data about them. You are the subject of data when you can be identified from the data. Government data is a term that means all recorded information a government entity has, including paper, email, flash drives, CDs, DVDs, photographs, etc. Classification of data about you The Government Data Practices Act presumes that all government data are public unless a state or federal law says that the data are not public. Data about you are classified by state law as public, private, or confidential. See below for some examples. Public data We must give public data to anyone who asks. It does not matter who is asking for the data or why the person wants the data. The following is an example of public data about you: Example: John Smith, 5000 Smith Dr, Smithtown, MN 55000; License applicant for On -Sale Liquor License for Smithtown Liquors Private data We cannot give private data to the general public, but you can have access to private data when the data are about you. We can share your private data with you, with someone who has your permission, with our government entity staff who have a work assignment to see the data, and to others as permitted by law or court order. The following is an example of private data about you: Example: John Smith's Social Security Number: 468- 88 -XXXX Confidential data Confidential data have the most protection. Neither the public nor you can get access even when the confidential data are about you. We can share confidential data about you with our government entity staff who have a work assignment to see the data, and to others as permitted by law or court order. We cannot give you access to confidential data. The following is an example of confidential data about you: Example: John Smith as mandated reporter of complaint regarding child abuse Data Practice Policy for Data Subjects Annual Review and Update Dated 5/29/2018 MN 13.025 and 13.03 Your rights under the Government Data Practices Act The City of Shorewood must keep all government data in a way that makes it easy for you to access data about you. Also, we can collect and keep only those data about you that we need for administering and managing programs that are permitted by law. As a data subject, you have the following rights. Access to your data You have the right to look at (inspect), free of charge, public and private data that we keep about you. You also have the right to get copies of public and private data about you. The Government Data Practices Act allows us to charge for copies. You have the right to look at data, free of charge, before deciding to request copies. Also, if you ask, we will tell you whether we keep data about you and whether the data are public, private, or confidential. As a parent, you have the right to look at and get copies of public and private data about your minor children (under the age of 18). As a legally appointed guardian, you have the right to look at and get copies of public and private data about an individual for whom you are appointed guardian. Minors have the right to ask this government entity not to give data about them to their parent or guardian. If you are a minor, we will tell you that you have this right. We may ask you to put your request in writing and to include the reasons that we should deny your parents access to the data. We will make the final decision about your request based on your best interests. Minors do not have this right if the data in question are educational data maintained by an educational agency or institution. When we collect data from you When we ask you to provide data about yourself that are not public, we must give you a notice. The notice is sometimes called a Tennessen warning. The notice controls what we do with the data that we collect from you. Usually, we can use and release the data only in the ways described in the notice. We will ask for your written permission if we need to use or release private data about you in a different way, or if you ask us to release the data to another person. This permission is called informed consent. If you wont us to release data to another person, you must use the consent form we provide. Protecting your data The Government Data Practices Act requires us to protect your data. We have established appropriate safeguards to ensure that your data are safe. In the unfortunate event that we determine a security breach has occurred and an unauthorized person has gained access to your data, we will notify you as required by law. Data Practice Policy for Data Subjects Annual Review and Update Dated 5/29/2018 MN 13.025 and 13.03 When your data are inaccurate and /or incomplete You have the right to challenge the accuracy and /or completeness of public and private data about you. You also have the right to appeal our decision. If you are a minor, your parent or guardian has the right to challenge data about you. How to make a request for your data You can look at data, or request copies of data that the City of Shorewood keeps about you, your minor children, or an individual for whom you have been appointed legal guardian. Make your request for data to the appropriate individual listed in the Data Practices Contacts on page 6. We prefer you use the data request from on Page 8 for all data requests. If you choose not to use the data request form, your request should include: • You are making a request, under the Government Data Practices Act (Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13), as a data subject, for data about you. • Whether you would like to inspect the data, have copies of the data, or both. • A clear description of the data you would like to inspect or have copied. • Identifying information that proves you are the data subject, or data subject's parent /guardian. The City of Shorewood requires proof of your identity before we can respond to your request for data. If you are requesting data about your minor child, you must show proof that you are the minor's parent. If you are a guardian, you must show legal documentation of your guardianship. Please see the Standards for Verifying Identity located on page 9. How we respond to a data request Once you make your request, we will work to process your request. • If it is not clear what data you are requesting, we will ask you for clarification. If we do not hove the data, we will notify you in writing within 10 business days. • If we have the data, but the data are confidential or private data that are not about you, we will notify you within 10 business days and state which specific law says you cannot access the data. • If we have the data, and the data are public or private data about you, we will respond to your request within 10 business days, by doing one of the following: • Arrange a date, time, and place to inspect data, for free, if your request is to look at the data, or • Provide you with copies of the data within 10 business days. You may choose to pick up your copies, or we will mail or fax them to you. We will provide electronic copies (such as email or CD -ROM) upon request if we keep the data in electronic format. Information about copy charges is on page 7. Data Practice Policy for Data Subjects Annual Review and Update Dated 5/29/2018 MN 13.025 and 13.03 We will provide notice to you about our requirement to prepay for copies. After we have provided you with access to data about you, we do not have to show you the data again for 6 months unless there is a dispute or we collect or create new data about you. If you do not understand some of the data (technical terminology, abbreviations, or acronyms), please let us know. We will give you an explanation if you ask. The Government Data Practices Act does not require us to create or collect new data in response to a data request if we do not already have the data, or to provide data in a specific form or arrangement if we do not keep the data in that form or arrangement (for example, if the data you request are on paper only, we are not required to create electronic documents to respond to your request). If we agree to create data in response to your request, we will work with you on the details of your request, including cost and response time. In addition, we are not required under the Government Data Practices Act to respond to questions that are not specific requests for data. Data Practice Policy for Data Subjects Annual Review and Update Dated 5/29/2018 MN 13.025 and 13.03 Data Practices Contacts Responsible Authority Name: Sandie Thone, City Clerk Address: City of Shorewood, 5755 Country Club Road, Shorewood, MN 55331 Phone number /fax number /email address: Phone: 952 - 960 -7900, Fax: 952 - 474 -0128, Email: sthone @ci.shorewood.mn.us Data Practices Compliance Official Name: Sandie Thone, City Clerk Address: City of Shorewood, 5755 Country Club Road, Shorewood, MN 55331 Phone number /fax number /email address: Phone: 952 - 960 -7900, Fax: 952 - 474 -0128, Email: sthone @ci.shorewood.mn.us Data Practices Designee(s) 1) Name: Twila Grout, Administrative Assistant Address: City of Shorewood, 5755 Country Club Road, Shorewood, MN 55331 Phone number /fax number /email address: Phone: 952 - 960 -7900, Fax: 952 - 474 -0128, Email: tgrout @ci.shorewood.mn.us 2) Name: Brenda Pricco, Administrative Assistant Address: City of Shorewood, 5755 Country Club Road, Shorewood, MN 55331 Phone number /fax number /email address: Phone: 952 - 960 -7900, Fax: 952 - 474 -0128, Email: bpricco @ci.shorewood.mn.us Data Practice Policy for Data Subjects Annual Review and Update 6 Dated 5/29/2018 MN 13.025 and 13.03 Copy Costs — Data Subjects The City of Shorewood charges data subjects for copies of government data. These charges are authorized under Minnesota Statutes, section 13.04, subdivision 3. You must pay for the copies before we will give them to you. Actual cost of making the copies In determining the actual cost of making copies, we factor in employee time, the cost of the materials onto which we are copying the data (paper, flash drive, CD, DVD, etc.), and mailing costs (if any). If your request is for copies of data that we cannot reproduce ourselves, such as photographs, we will charge you the actual cost we must pay an outside vendor for the copies. Data Practice Policy for Data Subjects Annual Review and Update Dated 5/29/2018 MN 13.025 and 13.03 Data Request Form — Data Subjects To request data as a data subject, you must show a valid state ID, such as a driver's license, military ID, or passport as proof of identity. Contact information Data subject name: Parent /Guardian name (if applicable): Address: Phone number /email address: Staff verification Request date: Identification provided: I am requesting access to data in the following way: LL Inspection LL Copies LL Both inspection and copies We will respond to your request within 10 business days. Note: Inspection is free. The City of Shorewood charges to print hard copies of data. These are the data I am requesting: Describe the data you are requesting as specifically as possible. Data Practice Policy for Data Subjects Annual Review and Update 8 Dated 5/29/2018 MN 13.025 and 13.03 Standards for Verifying Identity The following constitute proof of identity. • An adult individual must provide a valid photo ID, such as • a state driver's license • a military ID • a passport • a Minnesota ID • a Minnesota tribal ID • A minor individual must provide a valid photo ID, such as • a state driver's license • a military ID • a passport • a Minnesota ID • a Minnesota Tribal ID • a Minnesota school ID • The parent or guardian of a minor must provide a valid photo ID and either • a certified copy of the minor's birth certificate or • a certified copy of documents that establish the parent or guardian's relationship to the child, such as • a court order relating to divorce, separation, custody, foster care • a foster care contract • an affidavit of parentage • The legal guardian for an individual must provide a valid photo ID and a certified copy of appropriate documentation of formal or informal appointment as guardian, such as • court order(s) • valid power of attorney Note: Individuals who do not exercise their data practices rights in person must provide either notarized or certified copies of the documents that are required or an affidavit of ID. Data Practice Policy for Data Subjects Annual Review and Update 9 Dated 5/29/2018 MN 13.025 and 13.03 Notice of Adoption of Model Policies Minnesota Statutes, section 13.025, subdivisions 2 and 3, require government entities to prepare written policies that relate to public access to government data, and rights of subjects of data and Minnesota Statutes, section 13.03, subdivision 2, requires entities to establish procedures so that data requests are complied with appropriately and promptly. Minnesota Statutes, section 13.073, subd. 6, requires the Commissioner of Administration to prepare model policies and procedures to help government entities comply with those requirements. Entities that choose to adopt the Commissioner's model policies must notify the Commissioner. Please use the following statement to notify the Commissioner if you choose to adopt the model policies and procedures.* Notice to Commissioner of Administration: Adoption of Model Policies The City of Shorewood has adopted the Commissioner's Model Policy for the Public and Model Policy for Data Subjects. This notice to the Commissioner satisfies the City of Shorewood's obligation under Minnesota Statutes, section 13.073, subdivision 6. Sandie Thone City Clerk and Data Practices Responsible Authority Adoption of Model Policy Notice to Commissioner Submitted May 8, 2017 *Government entities may submit this notification by mail or email: Commissioner of Administration c/o Information Policy Analysis Division (IPAD) 201 Administration Building 50 Sherburne Avenue St. Paul, MN 55155 info.ipad @state.mn.us Data Practice Policy for Data Subjects Annual Review and Update 10 Dated 5/29/2018 MN 13.025 and 13.03 V 2E MEETING TYPE City of Shorewood u nCI l Meeting Item Regular Meeting Title / Subject: Accept Quote for Painting of Fire Hydrants Meeting Date: May 29, 2018 Prepared by: Larry Brown, Director of Public Works Attachments Quote by Pole Painting Plus, Resolution Policy Consideration: Should the City of Shorewood enter into a contract with Pole Painting Plus to prepare and paint hydrants? Background / Previous Action: Staff has received several requests from residents of the Amesbury Subdivision regarding the appearance of the fire hydrants within the subdivision. To date, staff has not had the manpower or resources to grind down the hydrants and repaint them utilizing the epoxy paints required by the Minnesota Department of Health (MDH). Therefore, staff solicited a quote from Pole Painting Plus, as they have performed work with the City of Shorewood previously. Attachment 1 to this report is a proposal in the amount of $2,470. to grind and paint 26 hydrants within the subdivision. Staff Recommendation: Staff is recommending approval of a motion accepting the proposal from Pole Painters Plus, in the amount $2,470. Financial or Budget Considerations: The Water Operating - Contractual Budget has sufficient funds to cover this expense. Options: 1. Approve the Resolution as proposed. 2. Provide Staff with alternative direction. Recommendation /Action Requested: Staff is recommending Option 1 that approves the Resolution that accepts the proposal from Pole Painters Plus be approved. Connection to Vision / Mission: Properly maintaining infrastructure is key to city services. Mission Statement: The City of Shorewood is committed to providing residents quality public services, a healthy environment, a variety of attractive amenities, a sustainable tax base, and sound financial management through effective, efficient, and visionary leadership. Page 1 Pole P< <�s•' 7474 Jason Ave NE Monticello MN 55362 Estimate city of shorewood Larry Brown Date 4/30/2018 Estimate # 1157 P.O. # 771 Item Description Qty 'I Rate Total hydrants Grind prime and paint hydrant in Amesbury subdivision 26 95.00 2,470.00 Total $2,470.00 ATTACHMENT 1 CITY OF SHOREWOOD RESOLUTION NO. 18 -XXX A RESOLUTION TO AWARD QUOTE TO POLE PAINTERS PLUS TO PAINT FIRE HYDRANTS IN AMESBURY WHEREAS, the City of Shorewood has received several requests for repainting of fire hydrants within the Amesbury Subdivision; and WHEREAS, the Director of Public Works has solicited quotes for painting of said fire hydrants; and WHEREAS, Pole Painters Plus has submitted a quote for said work and the Director of Public Works has found the proposal to be in order. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Shorewood, Minnesota, approves the proposal provided by Pole Painters Plus, attached hereto as "Exhibit A." ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD this 29th day of May, 2018. ATTEST: Sandie Thone, City Clerk Scott Zerby, Mayor Pole P< <�s•' 7474 Jason Ave NE Monticello MN 55362 Estimate city of shorewood Larry Brown Date 4/30/2018 Estimate # 1157 P.O. # 771 Item Description Qty 'I Rate Total hydrants Grind prime and paint hydrant in Amesbury subdivision 26 95.00 2,470.00 Total $2,470.00 ■ 11 i " #2F MEETING TYPE City of Shorewood Council Meeting Item REGULAR Title / Subject: Approve Agreement between SLMPD and City of Excelsior for council security detail services Meeting Date: May 29, 2018 Prepared by: Greg Lerud, City Administrator Attachments: Memo from Chief Meehan & 2018 Excelsior City Council meeting security services Background: The City of Excelsior has requested the presence of a police officer at their council meetings. This service is outside the scope of the Joint Powers Agreement, but the JPA allows a member community to contract with the SLMPD for additional services provided these services do not use existing SLMPD staff. All costs are the responsibility of the contracting city and the other member cities must approve the agreement. Financial or Budget Considerations: There are no financial considerations. Options: Approve the agreement between Excelsior and the SLMPD; deny approval; or request additional information. Recommendation / Action Requested: Staff recommends Council approve the agreement between Excelsior and the SLMPD for the 2018 city council security detail. Next Steps and Timeline: Staff will notify the SLMPD and the City of Excelsior of the approval. Mission Statement: The City of Shorewood is committed to providing residents quality public services, a healthy environment, a variety of attractive amenities, a sustainable tax base, and sound financial management through effective, efficient, and visionary leadership. Page 1 TO: City 0fExcelsior City OfShorewood City nfTVDkgBay City OfGreenwood DATE : May 16 1h 2018 RE: 2O18 Excelsior Council Meeting Security Detail The Joint Powers Agreement allows member cities to contract with the SLMPD for additional services, as long as the proposed services do not use existing SLMPD staffing hours. All costs are the responsibility of the contracting city and the other member cities must approve the agreement. During the January 24 m ,2D1M Coordinating Committee Meeting, the Committee unanimously approved a motion to allow member cities to contract with SLMPD to provide security during city council meetings. Please submit the proposed City Council Security Agreement between the City of Excelsior and the SLMPD on the agenda for approval at the next city council meeting. Attached is a breakdown of the proposed 2018 security detail budget. Please contact me if you have any questions or concerns. Part-Time Seasonal Positions Projected Hours Hourly Rate Total Amount 2018 Total Police Officer Licensed Police Officer - Beginning June 2018; Costs 28 $87.50 $2,450 estimated at special event rate Contingency 7 $87.50 $613 Total 35 $3,063 Projected Budget - 2018 #2G MEETING TYPE City of Shorewood Council Meeting Item REGULAR Title / Subject: Finance Director Position Meeting Date: May 29, 2018 Prepared by: Greg Lerud, City Administrator Attachments: Finance Director job description, Notice Policy Consideration: Should the City hire a full -time staff person to fill the position of Finance Director? Background: The city has worked with Bergan /KDV since last April to provide Joe Rigdon as Interim Finance Director on a part -time basis (approximately 16 hours per week.) Joe continues to do an outstanding job for the city. Having a part time finance director for a year has worked okay, but it is not the ideal long -term arrangement. There are limitations to what anyone can do on a part time basis, and while it has been managed well thus far — and would likely be for the foreseeable future under a part time arrangement, there is a need for a full -time person so that the things that are not being done as well as they could be. Financial planning such as long -term capital needs, forecasting, etc. are those tasks that most benefit the long -term financial health of the city. The fact is there is not enough time left in the 16 hours after the daily or weekly requirements have been met to tackle these projects. Joe does not have additional time in his schedule to give Shorewood the additional time that is needed. Financial or Budget Considerations: Information was presented at the retreat that the city is paying approximately $124,500 for part time finance director services. The city could create a full time opening for approximately $132,000 more than doubling the amount of staff time and significantly bringing down the per hour cost for the service. Options: The City Council has broad authority for filling positions. The Council can approve staff's recommendation; request additional information about the alternatives, approve proceeding with an alternative, or reject advertising the position and give different direction to staff. Recommendation / Action Requested: A motion to approve the job description as submitted and authorize advertising for the open position. Next Steps and Timeline: Staff will advertise the position and proceed with the hiring process. Because this position is a department head position, the personnel committee and the council will participate in the interview process. Mission Statement: The City of Shorewood is committed to providing residents quality public services, a healthy environment, a variety of attractive amenities, a sustainable tax base, and sound financial management through effective, efficient, and visionary leadership. Page 1 C:1TY O SHOR WOOD POSITION TITLE: Finance Director /Treasurer DEPARTMENT: Finance ACCOUNTABLE TO: City Administrator SUPERVISES: Senior Accountant OBJECTIVE AND SCOPE To plan, develop and supervise City financial functions in order to provide efficient, effective and accurate accounting and control systems for the City. ESSENTIAL FUNCTIONS OF THE POSITION A. Administers financial activities and accounting operations of the City. 1. Supervises all accounting functions, including cash records and control, receivables, payables, subsidiary reports and invoices. 2. Performs cash flow analysis and supervises bank transactions. 3. Prepares and distributes monthly financial statements to the City Council, Commissions, and City Administrator. 4. Prepares and provides quarterly financial reports and statements to City Council. 5. Reviews purchase orders and disbursement requests for compliance with City budget. 6. Maintains financial ledgers, journals and subsidiary reports. 7. Supervises operation & maintenance of computerized accounting system. B. Invests City funds according to legally approved investment policies and guidelines and maintains detailed records of investments. May 2018 1 Anticipates City cash and liquidity needs and invests funds to provide necessary cash flow. 2. Maintains the safety of invested funds while maximizing returns on investments in compliance with investment policies and guidelines. C. Manages staff performing payroll, utility billing, and general accounting for the City. Ensures the proper preparation of payroll checks for all City employees and the maintenance of payroll records. 2. Ensures proper preparation of withholding reports and deposits, and all monthly, quarterly and annual reports as required by law. Oversees maintenance of the computerized payroll system. 4. Supervises preparation of quarterly utility billing and maintenance of computerized utility billing system. D. Coordinates preparation of annual budget with City Administrator based upon goals and objectives established by the City Council. Prepares and manages all departments' yearly budget. 2. Responsible for financial projections and budget estimates as required. E. Annually reviews and updates City Capital Improvement Financing Program with City Administrator, City Engineer and Public Works Director. F. Coordinates annual audit and preparation of year end reports. Prepares year end detail for Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR). 2. Schedules annual audit and prepares work papers, summaries and all other information required by auditors. Provides audit and CAFR to City Council along with a summary of City's year -end financial status. G. Assists with the coordination of City data processing and computer system needs. H. Manages the City's fixed assets procedures and records. 1. Reviews and establishes procedures to assure the protection of City assets. May 2018 2 2. Supervise the preparation and maintenance of the City's fixed asset records in accordance with the Capital Asset policy adopted by the City Council. Manages City special assessment procedures and records. Coordinates with City Engineer the preparation of special assessment rolls. 2. Prepares and certifies all assessment of new levies, equalization, division splits, and delinquent utility certification to the Council for tax collection. Monitor and draft legislation as it pertains to financial operation of the City. Informs City Council of impending or adopted legislation. 2. Drafts ordinances, amendments, and resolutions. L. Responsible for the preparation and filing of State and Federal reports (quarterly and annual payroll tax reports, PERA reporting, sales & use tax reports, etc.) M. Serves as a member of various employee committees. N. Performs other duties as apparent or assigned. SUPERVISORY RESPONSIBILITIES Carries out supervisory responsibilities of all employees within the finance department in accordance with City policies and applicable laws. Responsibilities include training; planning, assigning, and directing work; evaluating performance; rewarding employees; disciplining employees including oral and written reprimands and the ability to suspend; transferring; adjusting grievances; addressing complaints and resolving problems of employees. Responsibilities also include the ability to effectively recommend: hiring; promoting; demoting; and discharging employees. EDUCATION and /or EXPERIENCE Bachelor's degree (B.A.) in Accounting, Finance, Business Administration or related field. Minimum of three years related experience in responsible municipal financial management and municipal accounting. Masters degree in a related field, CPA, Certified Public Finance Officer, and supervisory experience preferred. OTHER KNOWLEDGE, SKILLS AND ABILITIES Ability to read, analyze, and interpret documents, procedure manuals, general business periodicals, professional journals, financial data, technical procedures, and governmental regulations. Ability to prepare clear reports and correspondence. May 2018 • Ability to communicate effectively both orally and in writing with elected and appointed officials, staff, other public officials, and the general public. • Ability to establish and maintain effective working relationships with department heads, other employees, public officials, and the general public. • Ability to make arithmetic computations using whole numbers, fractions, and decimals. • Ability to compute rates, ratios, and percentage • Thorough knowledge of the principles and practices of governmental accounting, budgeting, payroll administration, and assessment and levy procedures. • Ability to develop sound accounting systems and procedures. • Ability to plan, coordinate and perform work involved in varied financial and related activities. • Ability to analyze and interpret fiscal and accounting records. • Ability to prepare comprehensive financial statements and reports and to recommend and administer general controlling policies. • Thorough knowledge of state and federal regulations, policies and procedures concerning municipal accounting and government financial operations. • Knowledge of modern office practices and procedures and standard office and accounting equipment and software. • Knowledge of office systems and machinery, especially computer and information processing systems. • Should possess a thorough operational knowledge of City financial systems and procedures. • Ability to supervise and motivate Finance Department personnel, and to delegate tasks to appropriate personnel. • Ability to work amicably with others in a small office environment. In compliance with the American With Disabilities Act the following represents the Physical and Environmental Demands: The position requires an equal amount of time spent standing, walking, and sitting. Lifting, pushing /pulling, or carrying objects weighing up to twenty five (25) pounds is sometimes required. Climbing, stooping, kneeling, crouching, crawling, twisting, and bending are sometimes required. Repetitive movements of the hands are sometimes required. Audio, visual, and verbal functions are essential functions to performing this position. The majority of the workday is spent indoors. May 2018 4 The City of Shorewood (pop. 7,700) is accepting applications for Finance Director to provide management of the city finance department. Shorewood is predominately a residential community located on the south shore of Lake Minnetonka. Position is responsible for the overall financial activities and accounting functions of the city, including; coordinating budget and audit process, managing city's investments and fixed assets, and supervising payroll and utility billing preparation. Must possess BA in Accounting, Finance, Business Administration or related field, three years of experience; CPA and Master's degree preferred. Starting salary DOQ, 2018 salary range is $95,250 to $114,325. Position is open until filled, but first review of applications will begin June 15. Applications are available at Shorewood City Hall, 5755 Country Club Road, or at the city's website, www.ci.shorewood.mn.us. Contact Greg Lerud, Shorewood City Administrator, at (952) 960 -7905 for any questions. #2H MEETING TYPE City of Shorewood Council Meeting Item Regular Meeting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Title / Subject: 2017 Pavement Reclamation Project (Howards Point Road, Kathleen Court, Oak Ridge Circle, and Summit Avenue), City Project 17 -13 Meeting Date: May 29, 2018 Prepared by: Katie Koscielak, Project Engineer Reviewed by: Alyson Fauske, City Engineer Attachments: Change Order No. 3, Resolution Approving Change Order No. 3 Background: The City Council awarded the construction contract for the 2017 Pavement Reclamation Project (Howards Point Road, Kathleen Court, Oak Ridge Circle, and Summit Avenue), City Project 17 -13, on September 11, 2017. Following the preconstruction meeting held in the fall of 2017, the Contractor had agreed to honor prices as bid to extend the completion date to May 31, 2018. The extended completion date allowed work to be completed along Eureka Road and at the intersections of Yellowstone Trail /Country Club Road, Yellowstone Trail /Lake Linden Drive and CSAH 19 in the fall of 2017 with the remaining work along Howards Point Road, Kathleen Court, Oak Ridge Circle, and Summit Avenue to be completed in the spring of 2018. The City Council approved Change Order No. 1 to extend the contract completion date to May 31, 2018. Currently, ductile iron watermain existing along the majority of Howards Point Road. Upon further investigation, it was determined that services were never extended to properties along the east side of the roadway between the north entrance to Brentridge Road and approximately 400 feet south of Brynmawr Place. Given the improvements identified to be completed along Howards Point Road, it would be a timely and cost effective opportunity for the City to extend services to these properties for future connection. With the spring snowfalls, extended spring road restrictions, and scheduling to have the water service extension completed, Staff expressed concern regarding the scheduling of the remaining construction items to be completed by May 31, 2018. The Contractor has agreed to honor prices as bid to extend the completion date to June 15, 2018. Change Order No. 3 extends the contract completion date to June 15, 2018. C. S. McCrossan Contracting Inc. has signed the change order identifying the contract completion date extension. The change order has been reviewed by staff with regard to the work scope and recommends approval. Financial or Budget Considerations: The project construction contract as bid was awarded by the Council in the amount of $510,924.60 and Change Order No. 2 increased the construction contract to $825,980.55. Change Order No. 3 extending the contract completion date will not result in an increase in the contract construction costs. Mission Statement: The City of Shorewood is committed to providing residents quality public services, a healthy environment, a variety of attractive amenities, a sustainable tax base, and sound financial management through effective, efficient, and visionary leadership. Page 1 Recommendation: Staff recommends the City Council approve the attached resolution "Approving Change Order No. 3 for the 2017 Pavement Reclamation Project (Howards Point Road, Kathleen Court, Oak Ridge Circle, and Summit Avenue), City Project 17 -13" CITY OF SHOREWOOD RESOLUTION NO. 18 - 5 A RESOLUTION APPROVING CHANGE ORDER NO 3 FOR THE 2017 PAVEMENT RECLAMATION PROJECT (HOWARDS POINT ROAD, KATHLEEN COURT, OAK RIDGE CIRCLE, AND SUMMIT AVENUE) CITY PROJECT 17 -13 WHEREAS, the City of Shorewood City of Shorewood Council awarded the contract for the 2017 Pavement Reclamation Project (Howards Point Road, Kathleen Court, Oak Ridge Circle, and Summit Avenue), City Project 17 -13, on September 11, 2017; and WHEREAS, Change Order No. 1 extended the project completion date to May 31, 2018, from the original contract completion date of November 10, 2017; and WHEREAS, Change Order No. 2 increased the project construction costs in the amount of $15,055.95, from the original contract amount of $510,924.60 to $525,980.55; and WHEREAS, Change Order No. 3 is necessary to construct the improvements and associated work to accommodate construction delays due to weather and additional utility improvement scheduling; and WHEREAS, Change Order No. 3 will extend the project completion date to June 15, 2018, from the revised contract completion date of May 31, 2018. Change Order No. 3 does not increase the contract amount. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Shorewood, Minnesota: Change Order No. 3 is approved, extending the contract completion date to June 15, 2018. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD this 29th day of May, 2018. ATTEST: Sandie Thone, City Clerk Scott Zerby, Mayor CHANGE ORDER NO. 3 2017 STREET RECLAMATION IMPROVEMENT PROJECT May 23, 2018 CITY OF SHOREWOOD, MN WSB PROJECT NO. 2925 -40 OWNER: CONTRACTOR: CITY OF SHOREWOOD C. S. MCCROSSAN CONSTRUCTION INC. 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD 7865 JEFFERSON HIGHWAY, BOX 1240 SHOREWOOD, MN 55331 MAPLE GROVE, MN 55311 YOU ARE DIRECTED TO MAKE THE FOLLOWING CHANGES IN THE CONTRACT DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION: EXTEND CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE TO JUNE 15, 2018 TO ACCOMMODATE WEATHER AND UTILITY DELAYS. IT IS UNDERSTOOD THAT THIS CHANGE ORDER INCLUDES ALL ADDITIONAL COSTS AND TIME EXTENSIONS WHICH ARE IN ANY WAY, SHAPE, OR FORM ASSOCIATED WITH THE WORK ELEMENTS DESCRIBED ABOVE. CHANGE IN CONTRACT PRICE: CHANGE IN CONTRACT TIME: ORIGINAL CONTRACT PRICE: $510,924.60 ORIGINAL CONTRACT TIME: 11/10/2017 PREVIOUS CHANGE ORDERS: $15,055.95 NET CHANGE FROM PREVIOUS CHANGE ORDERS: 202 CONTRACT PRICE PRIOR TO THIS CHANGE ORDER: $525,980.55 CONTRACT TIME PRIOR TO THIS CHANGE ORDER: 5/31/2018 NET INCREASE OF THIS CHANGE ORDER: $0.00 NET INCREASE WITH CHANGE ORDER: 15 CONTRACT PRICE WITH ALL APPROVED CHANGE ORDERS: $525,980.55 CONTRACT TIME WITH APPROVED CHANGE ORDERS: 6/15/2018 APPROVED BY: APPROVED BY: ALYSON FAUSKE, PE, PROJECT MANAGER CONTRACTOR SIGNATURE WSB & ASSOCIATES, INC. C. S. MCCROSSAN CONSTRUCTION INC. ENGINEER CONTRACTOR APPROVED BY: CITY ENGINEER CITY ADMINISTRATOR DATE DATE K:102925-40014 dminlConstruction AdminlChange OrderslChange ORder No. 31Change Order No. 3CO3 CHANGE ORDER NO. 3 DETAIL 2017 STREET RECLAMATION IMPROVEMENT PROJECT CITY OF SHOREWOOD, MN WSB PROJECT NO. 2925 -40 ADDED ITEMS May 23, 2018 Item No. Mat. No. Description Unit Qty Price Extended Amount TOTAL ADDED ITEMS CHANGE ORDER NO. 3 TOTAL ADJUSTMENT TO ORIGINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT KA029254001AdminlConstruction AdminlChange OrderslChange ORder No. 31Change Order No. 3CO3 Detail #5A MEETING TYPE City of Shorewood Council Meeting Item REGULAR Title / Subject: 2017 Met Council Population and Household Estimates Meeting Date: May 29, 2018 Prepared by: Greg Lerud, City Administrator Attachments: Metropolitan Council Preliminary 2017 population estimates Background: The Met Council provides annual population and household estimates for the communities in the metropolitan area. Their population estimate for Shorewood, effective April 1, 2017 is 7,708 and a household total of 2,836. The 2010 population was 7,307, meaning the 2017 estimate shows a growth of 5.48% over seven years. This is for informational purposes only. No City Council action is required unless the Council would like to challenge the estimates. Mission Statement: The City of Shorewood is committed to providing residents quality public services, a healthy environment, a variety of attractive amenities, a sustainable tax base, and sound financial management through effective, efficient, and visionary leadership. Page 1 . . .......... ... J May 11, 2018 Greg Lerud, City Administrator City of Shorewood 5755 Country Club Rd Shorewood, MN 55331 Dear Mr. Lerud: The Metropolitan Council has prepared preliminary population and household estimates for your community as of April 1, 2017. This is an annual process governed by Minnesota Statutes 473.24. Please note that these estimates are different from the Council's local forecasts that your community has reviewed before. Forecasts look ahead to the coming decades; the annual estimates communicated below look back in time to the previous year. 2017Annual Population Estimate The Metropolitan Council estimates that the City of Shorewood had 7,708 people and 2,836 households as of April 1, 2017. Household size averaged 2.717 persons per household. How was this estimate calculated? We estimate households and population with a housing - stock -based method, which involves three questions: 1. How many housing units did your community have? 2. How many households occupied these housing units? 3. How manypeople lived in these occupied housing units? This letter includes an overview of our estimation method along with a report showing the data inputs and calculations used to develop the preliminary estimates. For more information, visit "dlp,. I 'V,�v V, (Hc� 1 „� x1111 "lci1 m i o'W� r,;,:iriixc,;, or contact me at 651- 602-1513. Can this estimate be compared to last year's estimate? Each year, we update our data and refine our methods, so preliminary estimates from different years are not directly comparable. We don't recommend taking the difference between the 2016 and 2017 estimates to calculate growth between 2016 and 2017. Instead, we recommend examining growth since the 2010 Census, which you can find in the enclosed report. How can my community provide feedback on this estimate? We welcome discussion of the preliminary estimates and invite you to review and comment on them. Please send any written comments or questions to Matt Schroeder, Metropolitan Council Research, 390 Robert Street North, Saint Paul, MN 55101; or by e -mail to '\, w .'° 111(w f ' ' Cal l i l c 0c f l l l 1. l i ;. Under° Minnesota Statutes 473.24, we must receive you), comments, questions, or specific objections, in writing, by June 24, 2018. What happens after my community provides feedback? The Council will certify final estimates by July 15, 2018 for state government use in allocating local government aid and street aid. Sincerely, A X 61 w, Matt Schroeder Senior Researcher city, Hennepin C, OUnty 20i7AhRUml Population Estimate F)ILiblished May 11, 2018 (prelirninary; dithbuted for local governmerd review) Howaingunitm Cf*cupanuyrata 2017 2,960 95.81% EaUonab* 2010 Z812 84.5296 Census _ Pmmamnsper Population PopwbUmmin Households household in households group quarters Tota|popu|mUon 2,836 2.717 7,704 4 2.858 2.748 7,303 4 ThekUimpo|KonOuund|eshmWeapupu|ahonumngdno haling aMokmeihod.Wh|ohanswers mainques|ona6xe�uh uommuniy aso[Aph| 1 2O/7 Fhrm[ how many hwumin8unRsdki the connnoumdyhave? � VVeMdmghhouaingunitsmemauedby the 3O10Cenmua. Own add un|bsbu|hbekmeen2O1Oand2Oi0.booedonpennis veporledbo xa byoommumhea, (Pennitdota are nvai/ab|aon ourwebaibe (5pmDsMmetc,atatemn.us/data__dmwm|mad/OO_mtm�,,,,impq) n VVeascume�ha|9596oioinQ|e'hmiN(Muheduniband8O%S town homeWuplex8hp|ex/quudp|ex units penniUedio 2U1Gwereoomp|eied and ocoupi,5eVyApn|1.2O11thenamamdare/eeesumedbz have been oomp|eiedakerdkzt date and xviU count Kwardnex|yaoCsesdmahee(h`rAp/i!1 2018), n RUMMY unKm pennMed bekween2O1O and 2O13anaaoaumedbbeuomp|ete& Unikspennidedbekwwen2014 and 2O1G are ouun�don|yif Hwy wmne open byAp/i|1 2O171 Hie nemoinin8unityVVU|oountknwanjnex1year'a estimates U UhayweraopenbyAph| 1,2818,Aczcr1mQ\oou/nacmda.ShorewoodpenmiVed0 muldtami|yunihain2O14or2U1S that we/a not openby Apt 1 201T and Ouni!epeMedin2OM =werenNupenbyApri|1.2O17 " Nlanufactunsd home dataoomemkomourannua|eumeyaofmunuw uredhomepwkupanamsand|ocm| goyemmevIu, o on other housing (boea. FPJm, ofn used as houoing) comes Nom He most oaenh An ehuen Communiy Gumey SK M houaing ia inc|udeU in Ohm esUmoieu only ifoouupied w VVea|momxom|ne oiherhouaing napoAedbyoommunk|ee. These VMS demoUhonu. bu||dingconvenaions (un|tm added or|ost).boondarychmngea(uniinonnexeU|no/ouU. and Me/chongeansporNdby (Ty and (oumoh|pobaf[ Housing stock Pern iUed and Other changes Housing stock April 1' 2010 built Me 2018 mince 2010 April i, 2017 2.367 79 -08 �m��98 r—`-~~ Tbmmhome (8n~MyuU�rhed) 358 12 O ~N�,� -- 61 O 0 � = ��^� ' �" 61 � ~ 80/Whio6he (5ormronaunis ) `' 2R 105 O n ~ �131 Alternative cv,,NIhqj umhc U O O ��' � � ffidantifavoirml humoes O / �� O 01hero0s U �� O Ma/ Z812 Z960 �ecmod'�uv manye�theeehwu OE" ingun tame/'E"0000uueha|oa� � Each housing type has aneo|imahad000upancy rate, These data come fi-on/ [he modeoeniAmehoonCommuni'�.yGumey eslimatemforhousin0 unitu and househn}ds' decennie|uenaus date from the U.S. Census 8uneau. and the UUS, Postal Service, ' � MuRJj-�Iying the numberofhnusingunKaoJ each, typeby the 000upani y y/e|do the numberofhouoeho}ds(n � upied flouoingunih4, ' �hird,#cnmman��eo��aive'd�mUhmmec):uupied'houminganOs? ° Each 110using type, has ill estirflated average hoi..isehold size. These clata coine frorii the most. rec.-;entArrlericari Coilirnunity Sumayeetimntesofhouaeho|doandpopu|otioninhouoeho|daaxNA/e||aedeoennia|oenauadoLahnmthpU.G.Cenoua Bureau. ° Multiplying the m,irnber of hmiseholds irl each ho(,isirig type by the average hntiyelold size yi,elds �he popu|a0onin households- Households Housing stock Occupancy (Occupied Persons per Population April i'2817 rate housing units) household in households 2.398 95.46Y6 2.289 2.781 Towmboome(S/mg/e^k),mvily 370 98.7596 365 2.781 � mtta'*h*cI) « Gi 84.9096 52 2.087 80ultirazmily/S urmrome moh-s> 131 99.0596 130 1.411 A/tenmmtivedmeWi7g un/i!,i U 99.05Y6 0 1.411 8�amm�ac��e��womes O 06.7196 0 1OUO � � CNhmr7-fwk"s D N/A O 253O .�� `.n�� » �.~ Tm the `woe|ow add thenunnbormf re, Wmnts�mgroup facQ�Jes. These are residerlces thal. are not part of the stariclard housing rnarket, SLIch as college clodri-rlitorles, rml-sing horles, prisons and jails, and Amup homoo. Data oome hnmthe Metropolitan Council's annual uuwey and the Minnesota Department ofHuman Population Population in Total population in households group quarters April 1.2O1Y '- 4 -- Due to mundinQ, not all estimates uan be repmduced exactly from the above inputa�� ^ For more infonnadon. see our methodology dooumentavzi|aNefrom httpm://wnww.me�ti,ououn�Lorg/popu|ationeafimates. 6A CITY OF SHOREWOOD PARK COMMISSION MEETING TUESDAY, MAY 8, 2018 MINUTES 1. CONVENE PARK COMMISSION MEETING Chair Mangold convened the meeting at 7:00 p.m. Chair Mangold, Commissioners V, Council Liaison Siakel; and Public Review Agenda Rock moved to approve the agenda as written. 2. Park Commission Meeting Vassar moved to approve the minutes motion. Motion carried 4 -0. 3. MATTE There were none. 4. NEW B1 A:. I Chair Mangold ni whether this was there was discuss He stated that thi 5755 COUNTRY CLUB RD SHOREWOOD CITY HALL 7:00 P.M. and Ashmore; City 4 -0. Rock seconded the vhat the Board had worked was included in the packet, but questioned r to date version. He stated that during the last conversation about it, the bigger parks into sections so there were priority areas and zones. seem to reflect those conversations. Brown stated that he calls this "the memo that wouldn't die" because it keeps reappearing. He noted that there have been a number of staff members that have been out sick or with other commitments. He apologized that when the packet was published, he did not catch that Twila had resurrected the levels of service. He stated that the last discussion was on designated priority areas and secondary areas, because as you read through this document the levels of service don't make sense because they are duplicating level one standards in level two areas. He reiterated his apology and stated that he would bring back the updated documents that showed the priority and secondary areas to their next meeting, but, would like to give a general overview of the maintenance plan for the parks. Brown stated that the ballfields and priority areas are mowed twice a week, if weather allows. The secondary areas are mowed once a week. He noted that our insurer requires that playground inspections PARK COMMISSION MINUTES TUESDAY, MAY 8, 2018 PAGE 2 OF 6 are completed monthly, but, noted that crews are taking a look at structures every week as they are in the area. He stated that restrooms are inspected every day, and cleaned, as needed, outside of weekends. He noted that this usually amounts to at least two times a week, but, will be more frequent if there is a tournament or other heavy use. He stated that the goal is to aerate annually, however that hasn't happened because of staffing levels. He stated that he is excited that their most recent hire, Scott Schroeder, has experience in turf management. He stated his hope that he will eventually be able to be dedicated to parks in a full -time capacity. He stated that weed control spraying is done twice a year on ballfields and once a year in the common areas. He stated that the City has brought on S &S Tree to inventory all of our trees within the public right of way and have laid out a removal plan where necessary. He stated that after a big storm event, the parks many times end up becoming a debris management area which he knows the Park Commission doesn't like. He stated that irrigation says that it will be checked monthly, but his guys are out there every day. He stated that hard surfaces are cleared of debris and checked for vandalism every week. He stated that he knows there has been concern about more weed control and they will attempt to focus on that this year. He noted that they haven't had a lot of issues with pest:control. He reviewed some general maintenance issues that staff is checking on. He noted that with snow removal there have been a few areas and lots that they have purposely not done to help prevent kids from coming to and trying "tricks" in the lots and ripping them up. He reiterated that he will bring this information back in written format with the zones identified for the next meeting. Chair Mangold stated that the information just shared by Director Brown are things they he believes they all agree on. He stated that from his perspective, there are certain areas that are not getting cared for like the ballfields are. He stated that one is the common area in Freeman Park by the memorial garden. He stated that he thinks the wording needs to be tweaked to make sure these areas are cared for with the same regard as the sports facilities. Commissioner Rock stated that one of the items on the agenda tonight is to talk about "Adopt a Park" and noted that this could be a centralized effort. Brown stated that the plaza at Freeman'Park has been controversial in the past. He stated that there was a time that area was supposed to be maintained by a volunteer and he ended up just riding off into the sunset. He noted that the City took a left of heat for the condition of the plantings and did step in and do some upgrades, but it was supposed to be taken care of by a volunteer group. He stated that he supports this because he doesn't want his guys spending their time tinkering with a flower garden. Chair Mangold stated that he believes the City has had good luck with volunteers for the entrance gardens at each park.. He stated that he didn't want to imply that the Public Works Department staff wasn't doing a good job, but,, wanted to make sure that they are looking at issues with the same level of importance as the Park Commission. Commissioner Vassar asked why the Commission was talking about maintenance now and whether it was because the Park Tour was,coming up. Chair Mangold stated that it is being talked about now because it completely fell off the agenda when Brad retired. Commissioner Vassar stated that she thinks it would be a good idea to have a discussion about park maintenance every year at the regular meeting before the annual Park Tour. B. Adopt a Park Program PARK COMMISSION MINUTES TUESDAY, MAY 8, 2018 PAGE 3 OF 6 Brown stated that Hopkins and Edina have taken on a program similar to the "Adopt a Highway" program. He stated the program seems pretty straight forward. He posed a question to the Commission about how to recognize volunteers or give them accolades. Chair Mangold stated that when he read this he thought of what was already happening with the entrance gardens at the parks. He isn't sure how adopting a park would do with some of the larger parks. He likes the idea, in theory, but isn't sure how it fits into the scale of what the City has going on right now. Brown stated that if the Commission thinks this is a worthwhile program, staff could come back with a bubble diagram of areas that would be a good fit for volunteers to adopt in each park. Commissioner Rock stated that he noticed when he read through the packet that the various cities are actually supplying many of the supplies, like plastic bags, brooms, and shovels. He questioned the level of effort from the City and whether they would tell people what they needed to do'to maintain the areas and give direction or just turn them loose. He suggested considering picking a "pilot" park for this program to see how it goes before it is used in all the parks. Brown stated that he felt that was a great idea and may not seem so overwhelming for The Commissions discussed starting with Manor or Badger P Chair Mangold stated that he feels like the ( a Park" title. He expressed concern that existing volunteers. Commissioner Vassar stated draw more attention to what Chair Mangold Commissioner Ashmore and create a mission. Commissioner Vassar suggeste was .asking acid if not, hand it a Commissioner Ruck stated that elements of the Darks, and the r. Council Liaison Si She wonders if an seems so daunting. thinks it didn't want doing this itjust doesn't have the official "Adopt he official program may step on the toes of the the official title because it would up with two side by side programs. of a formal program and put some parameters king the existing volunteers if they would be willing to do what the City to a newset of volunteers. approach would be to allow the existing volunteers to handle certain could be handled by other volunteers. the official "Adopt a Park" program had been well received in other cities. pt a Park" program would intimidate and scare some people off because it Commissioner Vassar stated that she was envisioning groups of people stepping up, not individuals. She stated that her impression was that the City was having difficulty finding people to maintain the gardens last year. Brown stated that with the "Adopt a Highway" program, it is a group and it is pretty much a one -day activity, once a year. He stated that frequency with the park upkeep may be an issue, because it is not something that you can just do once a year and be done. PARK COMMISSION MINUTES TUESDAY, MAY 8, 2018 PAGE 4 OF 6 Chair Mangold stated that if the City decides to do this, he wants to make sure there is a clear message about what the expectations are. Commissioner Vassar suggested asking staff to come back to the Commission with what they think would be most beneficial to have done for each park. She stated that they could discuss what those tasks would look like for a volunteer. Brown stated that he would also like to do a little homework regarding Council Liaison Siakel about what has worked in other communities. C. Review June and July Park Tour Agenda Chair Mangold stated that the park tours will be on June 12, 2018'and July 10,, 2018. He noted that the meeting start times will be moved to 6:00 p.m. to allow for mor6 daylight. He noted that the June meeting will begin on site at Freeman Park. Brown noted that in looking through the list compiled, last year after the tour, he thinks all but one of the items has been completed. Commissioner Vassar questioned whether the Commission ne Chair Mangold stated that even if it is in a sta walk it as part of the annual inspection process. Commissioner Vassar noted Brown noted that there is A that he would like to discuss Chair Mangold stated that fi are seen less frequently sucl the Commission to keep in n provide information on the available while they are on t 5. OLD BUSINESS A. Color,ODti are some look at Badger Park. he thinks the Park Commission should in Badger Park. a bridge structure on that trail that doesn't meet ADA standards. He stated is at a future meeting. the June Park Tour he would like to get Commission eyes on the areas that as the trails at Freeman and Badger Parks. He stated that he would also like nd the hockey boards at Cathcart that need to be replaced. He asked that staff 3tructares ;and their age and when they were installed so they can have it Sails for Badger Park Playground Equipment Brown stated that the Council had approved the Atlantic color scheme at their last meeting. He explained that Planning Director Darling chose spring green, dolphin gray, and sky blue for the flag colors and has placed the order. B. Parks Commission Meeting at City Council Work Session on May 14, 2018, 6:00 p.m. Brown noted that this meeting is to discuss the playground surface for the pirate ship structure at Badger Park. Chair Mangold asked if the surface material quotes had been finalized. PARK COMMISSION MINUTES TUESDAY, MAY 8, 2018 PAGE 5 OF 6 Brown stated that he believed the Planning Director Darling has costs associated with the different surfaces. Chair Mangold stated that he understands that the City has "costs" based on verbal square footage numbers over the phone. He would like to see actual documented "quotes" for the different products. He noted that the Council had discussed doing rubber mat throughout the whole area and the Park Commission had discussed using wood chip mulch. He stated that he would like to once again discuss materials as a group before the meeting with Council next week. Commissioner Vassar stated that she likes the idea of the poured rubber, but the price tag is a big factor. Commissioner Rock agreed that if cost wasn't an issue, he would choose the poured rubber material. Council Liaison Siakel stated that she felt the City should do was discussed two meetings ago at Council. She reviewed s< She stated that while the price point of it is enticing, wood ct the site. She stated that the City has already spend so mucl wood chips fit what the City was trying to create at the park . tag with the poured rubber, but when you start considering n really that far apart. She stated that if she had to vote today, rubber mat. She stated that she appreciated wanting to be a I there is a state of the art lacrosse field and new playground little extra money to have the park done right. Chair Mangold stated that he has an issue with that b $70,000, he would use the money for different items, f( and not a nicer playground surface: Council Liaison Siakel stated that this park has been c City should skimp on this portion. She stated that she just worry about this on and doing it well; st for the park. discussion iten are °dirty, messy and g, )ney on this park and She stated that this from the Council. ,t taken away from it didn't seem like She noted that there is a more sizable price intenancc and other issues, the price wasn't le thinks she would lean towards the poured od steward of tax dollars, but, feels because luipment, she feels it is worth it to spend a ;sion were given an additional trails or landscaping at Badger one piece at a time and she doesn't think the 't want to worry about other projects yet, but Commissioner Rock stated that he can see the advantages of reduced maintenance with poured rubber over wood chips. He stated that the trail issue worries him because it becomes a drainage issue, then a crossing or an, AIJA issue. He stated that it may make sense to just deal with one thing at a time and take other projects as thoy,come. He stated that the Park Commission makes recommendations to the Council and the decision is up to them including ,how to pay for it. Commissioner Ashmore stated that if the Commission won't be getting the money for other parts of the park, she would rubber. Commissioner Rock suggested that there may be possibilities for applying for future grant monies to be used for drainage or trail improvement projects. He stated that he is a fan of the poured rubber and can see the advantages regarding it being low maintenance. Council Liaison Siakel stated that to speak for herself, not the full Council, it is about the job the City is doing to turn this park into a first -class park. She stated that she doesn't have the numbers in front of her, but she remembers when they added all the parts up, including ongoing maintenance costs, the poured rubber was not astronomically different in price. PARK COMMISSION MINUTES TUESDAY, MAY 8, 2018 PAGE 6 OF 6 Commissioner Rock stated that having the poured rubber surface may actually be an additional draw for people coming to use the park, which would be a good thing. Chair Mangold reiterated his request to have actual quotes and numbers, not just estimated costs before the meeting with the Council. He stated that Council has done an awesome job of supporting Badger Park. He expressed his concern with the possibility of long term CIP projects such as the perimeter trail not being completed. Commissioner Rock stated that the trail is a great idea but has so many obstacles relating to drainage and accessibility. Chair Mangold stated that he just wanted to make sure that the Commission was clear in its priorities for the park. 6. STAFF AND LIAISON REPORTS / UPDATES A. City Council Council Liaison Siakel reported that she was filling in for report was that the Council had approved the purchase of p] None. Mangold moved to seconded the motioi Respectfully submitted, City iaison Labadie and the only thing to equipment as already discussed. Meeting of May 8, 2018 at 7:50 p.m. Rock V 8A MEETING TYPE City of Shorewood u nCI l Meeting Item Regular Meeting Title / Subject: Award Quote for Watermain Improvements, Howard's Point Road Meeting Date: May 29, 2018 Prepared by: Larry Brown, Director of Public Works Attachments Quote by Minger Construction Company, Inc., Resolution 18 -055 Policy Consideration: Should the City of Shorewood enter into a contract with Minger Construction Company, Inc. to perform watermain improvements? Background / Previous Action: Most recently, staff has made the recommendation that anytime major roadway construction is occurring where watermain exists, that cathodic protection be added to the watermain, in addition to replacement of valve bolts and hydrant bolts with a specific type of stainless steel bolt that has now become common place in the metro, due to corrosion issues. This is proposed to hopefully avoid reconstructing a roadway, and having to re- excavate a new roadway, due to a failure of bolts. In addition, staff also requested that the quote also include the addition of the extension of four water services for properties that have watermain in front of their property, but no services extended to the right of way line. Staff recommends these services be installed now, to avoid excavating the roadway in the future. Unfortunately, staff made this recommendation late this spring immediately ahead of the start of the contractor mobilizing to reclaim Howard's Point Road. When staff solicited a quote from C.S. McCrossan, the contractor indicated that this would add nine plus days of work and additional lead time to the contract. Staff was not willing to add that much time to this contract. Staff also solicited a quote from Minger Construction Company, Inc. Representatives from Minger indicated that they could mobilize within a day of approval and perform the work in an estimate four to five days. Staff took the liberty of moving ahead with the quote from Minger Construction, based upon timing and the preliminary numbers indicated by both contractors. The formal quote by Minger is attached as Attachment 1 to this memorandum for an amount of $49,090.40. While the sum is significant, recall that this work includes installation of four water services, four excavations for valve retrofits, six excavation for hydrant valve retrofits, and the addition of cathodic protection. Staff Recommendation: Staff is recommending approval of Resolution that awards the quote to Minger Construction Company, Inc. Mission Statement: The City of Shorewood is committed to providing residents quality public services, a healthy environment, a variety of attractive amenities, a sustainable tax base, and sound financial management through effective, efficient, and visionary leadership. Page 1 Financial or Budget Considerations: The Municipal Water Fund has adequate funds to facilitate this expenditure. Options: 1. Approve the Resolution as proposed. 2. Provide Staff with alternative direction. Recommendation /Action Requested: 1. Staff is recommending Option 1 that approves the Resolution that accepts the proposal from Minger Construction Company, Inc. be approved. Connection to Vision / Mission: Properly maintaining infrastructure is key to city services. Im AWIff NINE', r ,. ,'1 !#, 6-2.4) ( " P-4,% 952t T. To: City Of Shorewood Contact: Address: Shorewood, MN Phone: Fax: Project Name: Howards Point Water Services Bid Number: Project Location: Shorewood, MN Bid Date: 5/312018 Item # Item Description 7`.--.--.-:Umt Estimated Quantity i r;7.t �Pric, Total p� rice I Mobilization 1.00 LS $6,350.00 $6,350.00 2 Bituminous Pavement Removal 165.00 SY $10.90 $1,798.50 3 Bituminous Sawcut 192.00 LF $4.45 $854.40 4 Aggregate Base Class 5 (CV) 40.00 CY $65.00 $2,600.00 5 1" Curb Stop & Box 4.00 EACH $1,690.00 $6,760.00 6 1" Corp Stop 4.00 EACH $1,575.00 $6,300.00 7 1" Type K Copper 250.00 LF $12.55 $3,137.50 8 Traffic Control 1.00 LS $2,950.00 $2,950.00 9 Blanket W/ Topsoil, Seed And Fertilizer 400.00 SY $4.00 $1,600.00 10 Replace Valve Bolts 4.00 EACH $1,575.00 $6,300.00 11 Replace Hydrant Valve Bolts, Bonnet Bolts 6.00 EACH $1,700.00 $10,200.00 12 Anode Bag - 9 LB 4.00 EACH $60.00 $240.00 Total Base Bid Price: $49,090.40 01. Valve Box Replacement 13 Replace Valve Box 10.00 EACH $200.00 $2,000.00 The above prices, specifications and conditions are satisfactory and are hereby accepted, Buyer: Signature: 0 Date of Acceptance: #2 5/4/2018 10:41:38 AM CONFIRMED: VwTqer Construction Co., Inc. Authorized Signature: . . ........ ...... . Estimator: LwY-v Page 1 of 1 ATTACHMENT 1 CITY OF SHOREWOOD RESOLUTION NO. 18 -055 A RESOLUTION TO AWARD QUOTE TO MINGER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY INC. TO PERFORM WATERAIN IMPROVEMENTS ON HOWARD'S POINT ROAD WHEREAS, on September 11, 2017, the City of Shorewood entered into a Contract for roadway Improvements under City Project 17 -13 with C.S. McCrossan; and WHEREAS, ; subsequent to the commencement of said Contract staff made recommendations for watermain improvements to the existing watermain within Howard's Point Road; and WHEREAS, the Director of Public Works solicited quotes for said additional Improvements; and WHEREAS, Minger Construction Company, Inc. provided the lowest responsible quote for said Improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Shorewood, Minnesota, approves the proposal provided by Minger Construction Company, Inc., attached hereto as "Exhibit A." ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD this 29th day of May, 2018. ATTEST: Sandie Thone, City Clerk Scott Zerby, Mayor Im AWIff NINE', r ,. ,'1 !#, 6-2.4) ( " P-4,% 952t T. To: City Of Shorewood Contact: Address: Shorewood, MN Phone: Fax: Project Name: Howards Point Water Services Bid Number: Project Location: Shorewood, MN Bid Date: 5/312018 Item # Item Description 7`.--.--.-:Umt Estimated Quantity i r;7.t �Pric, Total p� rice I Mobilization 1.00 LS $6,350.00 $6,350.00 2 Bituminous Pavement Removal 165.00 SY $10.90 $1,798.50 3 Bituminous Sawcut 192.00 LF $4.45 $854.40 4 Aggregate Base Class 5 (CV) 40.00 CY $65.00 $2,600.00 5 1" Curb Stop & Box 4.00 EACH $1,690.00 $6,760.00 6 1" Corp Stop 4.00 EACH $1,575.00 $6,300.00 7 1" Type K Copper 250.00 LF $12.55 $3,137.50 8 Traffic Control 1.00 LS $2,950.00 $2,950.00 9 Blanket W/ Topsoil, Seed And Fertilizer 400.00 SY $4.00 $1,600.00 10 Replace Valve Bolts 4.00 EACH $1,575.00 $6,300.00 11 Replace Hydrant Valve Bolts, Bonnet Bolts 6.00 EACH $1,700.00 $10,200.00 12 Anode Bag - 9 LB 4.00 EACH $60.00 $240.00 Total Base Bid Price: $49,090.40 01. Valve Box Replacement 13 Replace Valve Box 10.00 EACH $200.00 $2,000.00 The above prices, specifications and conditions are satisfactory and are hereby accepted, Buyer: Signature: 0 Date of Acceptance: #2 5/4/2018 10:41:38 AM CONFIRMED: VwTqer Construction Co., Inc. Authorized Signature: . . ........ ...... . Estimator: LwY-v EXHIBIT A Page 1 of 1 #8B MEETING TYPE City of Shorewood Council Meeting Item Regular Meeting Title / Subject: Accept Plans and Specifications, and Authorize Advertisement for Bids for the 2018 Reconstruction of Riviera Lane, Mann Lane and Shorewood Lane, and Watermain Extension along Yellowstone Trail (Club Valley Road to Riviera Lane), Riviera Lane, State Highway 9 (Riviera Lane to Lake Linden Drive) and Lake Linden Drive (State Highway 7 to 6140 Lake Linden Drive), City Project 17 -04 Meeting Date: May 29, 2018 Prepared by: Katie Koscielak, WSB & Associates, Inc. Reviewed by: Alyson Fauske, City Engineer Attachments: Resolution, Plans Background: On January 22, 2018, the Shorewood City Council received the revised Feasibility Report and authorized preparation of plans and specifications for the 2018 Street and Utility Improvement Project, City Project 17 -04. Improvements identified in the 2018 Street and Utility Improvement Project include reconstruction of the existing bituminous streets along Shorewood Lane, Riviera Lane and Mann Lane meeting City design standards with concrete curb and gutter, storm sewer, and minor sanitary sewer improvements related to reduction in inflow and infiltration into the system. Additional improvements include extension of watermain along Yellowstone Trail, Riviera Lane, TH 7, and Lake Linden Drive. Extension of the watermain along Yellowstone Trail and extensions to Lake Linden Drive along TH 7 will be constructed by means of horizontal directional drilling as a trenchless construction method to reduce impacts to adjacent properties and Yellowstone Trail traffic flow. Extension of watermain along Riviera Lane will be by means of open cut installation with reconstructing the existing street. The attached Resolution approves the plans and specifications and authorizes the advertisement for bids. The advertisement will be placed in the City Official Publication, Finance and Commerce and on QuestCDN.com. Financial or Budget Considerations: The Feasibility Report opinion of probable project cost is $2,408,700 including the watermain extension. The project is proposed to be funded from the Street Reconstruction Fund, Storm Water Fund, Sanitary Sewer Fund, and Watermain Fund. Options: Staff recommends Council consider the following actions: Approve the resolution Approving Plans, Specifications and Authorizing Advertisement for Bids for the 2018 Reconstruction of Riviera Lane, Mann Lane and Shorewood Lane and watermain extension along Yellowstone Trail (Club Valley Road to Riviera Lane), Riviera Lane, State Highway 9 (Riviera Lane to Lake Linden Drive) and Lake Linden Drive (State Highway 7 to 6140 Lake Linden Drive. 2. Direct staff to modify plans. Mission Statement: The City of Shorewood is committed to providing residents quality public services, a healthy environment, a variety of attractive amenities, a sustainable tax base, and sound financial management through effective, efficient, and visionary leadership. Page 1 3. Take no action at this time. Recommendation: Staff recommends the City Council approve the attached resolution "Approving plans and specifications and authorizing advertisement for bids, 2018 Reconstruction of Riviera Lane, Mann Lane and Shorewood Lane and watermain extension along Yellowstone Trail (Club Valley Road to Riviera Lane), Riviera Lane, State Highway 9 (Riviera Lane to Lake Linden Drive) and Lake Linden Drive (State Highway 7 to 6140 Lake Linden Drive, City Project 17 -04" CITY OF SHOREWOOD RESOLUTION NO. 18 -056 A RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND AUTHORIZING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR THE 2018 RECONSTRUCTION OF RIVIERA LANE, MANN LANE AND SHOREWOOD LANE, AND THE WATERMAIN EXTENSION ALONG YELLOWSTONE TRAIL (CLUB VALLEY ROAD TO RIVIERA LANE), RIVIERA LANE, STATE HIGHWAY 7 (RIVIERA LANE TO LAKE LINDEN DRIVE) AND LAKE LINDEN DRIVE (STATE HIGHWAY 7 TO 6140 LAKE LINDEN DRIVE) CITY PROJECT 17 -04 WHEREAS, the City of Shorewood authorized preparation of plans and specifications for the 2018 Street and Utility Improvement Project, City Project 17 -04, on January 22, 2018; and WHEREAS, the City Council has directed the engineer to prepare plans and specifications; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has prepared Plans and Specifications for the 2018 Street and Utility Improvement Project, City Project 17 -04, to include complete street reconstruction along Shorewood Lane, Riviera Lane and Mann Lane complete with installation of concrete curb and gutter, bituminous paving, storm sewer construction and minor sanitary sewer improvements. Additional improvements include extension of watermain along Yellowstone Trail, Riviera Lane, TH 7, and Lake Linden Drive. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Shorewood, Minnesota: The Plans and Specifications were prepared by the City Engineer for such improvement. Said Plans and Specifications are hereby approved and shall be filed with the City Clerk. 2. The City Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official paper and according to Minnesota State Law an advertisement for bids, upon the making of such improvement under such approved plans and specifications. The advertisement shall be published for 3 weeks, shall specify the work to be done, shall state that bids will be opened and considered by the city at the specified time and date, in the City Hall Council Chambers, and that no bids will be considered unless sealed and filed with the Clerk and accompanied by a cash deposit, cashier's check, bid bond, or certified check payable to the Clerk for 5 percent of the amount of each bid. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD this 29th day of May, 2018. Scott Zerby, Mayor ATTEST: Sandie Thone, City Clerk EXISTING PLAN SYMBOLS IT I ENT TREE LINESEI� � AUFlF oNHEROUSTREE EXISTING UTILITY SYMBOLS FROM I� >.TEa Mnlu —II— —IS YE- -,,.ULT n- -El oLE p ELECTIN X X EUREKA ROAD 1-1 FlI N SEAMAN'S DRIVE SHOREWOOD LANE FROM —1S -1 EU lwHUILF TO Lu TI v—E N H1U NT 1AHURl.Y SE 11 LAIHILF !B' EXCAVATION NOTICE SYSTEM A CALL TO GOPHER STATE ONE (651154 -0002) IS REQUIRED A MINDAUM OF 4B HOURS PRIOR TO PERFORMING ANY EXCAVATION. PROJECT LOCATION COUNTY: HENNEPIN SECT 33 , TIAIP 117M, RNG 23W RIVIERA LANE, SHOREWOOD LANE, MANN LANE STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT CITY OF SHOREWOOD, MN CONSTRUCTION PLAN FOR STREET, SANITARY, WATER, STORM IMPROVEMENTS LOCATED ON RIVIERA LANE FROM YELLOWSTONE TRAIL TO SOUTH CUL -DE -SAC MANN LANE FROM EUREKA ROAD TO SEAMAN'S DRIVE SHOREWOOD LANE FROM SMITHTOWN ROAD TO NORTH CUL -DE -SAC YELLOWSTONE TRAIL FROM CLUB VALLEY ROAD TO RIVIERA LANE LOCATION PROJECT LOCATION MAP THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION IN THIS PLAN IS UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL D. THIS UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF CI /ASCE 30 -02.. ENTITLED "STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA:' GOPHER ONE CALL TICKET NUMBERS: 170661146, 0170661147, 170661148, 181171835 N k 0 1500 3000 SCALE IN FEET GOVERNING SPECIFICATIONS EDITION OF THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANS RTATION slANNARU SPtCItICA IONS -.R CONS RNO ION °SHALL GOV FRN. THIS WORK SH LL A BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE 2018 EDITION OG THE CITY OF ECAL SHOREWOOD ECIFICATIONS AND STANDARD DETAIL PLATES FOR STREET AND UTILITY CONSTRUCTION. ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICFS SHALL CONFORM TO THE LATEST EDITION OF FAR THR TFIELADNMANUAL FOR TEMPORARY TRAFFIC FIC VCONTROL ZONE THE LATEST I=1110[.9:1■INL7XI SHEET NO. DESCRIPTION G0.01 TITLE SHEET 0001 STATEMENT OF ESTIMATED QUANTITIES CO 02 EARTHWORK TABUUiTION 00.03 -00.12 DETAILS & STANDARD PLATES Ct Ot GENERAL LAYOUT & DRAINAGE C102 PROPOSED DETOUR ROUTE C2.01L2.02 TYPICAL SECTIONS C301 -C303 REMOVALS 01 C4 SANITARY SEWER AND WATERMAIN 05.011-5.03 STORM SEWER CA 01 -C605 STREET CONSTRUCTION 07.01 07.02 INTERSECTION DETAILS 08.01 -C8.05 CROSS SECTIONS 0901 -C904 EROSION CONTROL 09.05 -C9.07 SWPPP THIS PLAN CONTAINS 49 SHEETS I I - M CITY OF SHOREWOOD THIS PLAN SET HAS BEEN PREPARED FOR CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD SHOREWOOD, MN 55331 (952) 960 -7900 ALL APPLICABLE FEDERAL, STATE, AND LOCAL LAWS AND ORDINANCES WILL BE COMPLIED WITH IN THE CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT. WSB I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER ENGIN IE'T THE -1 OF THEIS �I.TAFDOF MIIN NESOTD PROFESSIONAL ALYSON FAUSKE, P.E., P.E. DATE: 05I2A18 LICENSE NUMBER: 42437 SHEET WSB PROJ. NO. 02925 -240 G0.01 c o L o a ° o a ° N.„ os3NNw10 s— dad 1. d aNdN'os^a3d0d_ idsl ltl l 'la3 AH3a3H ViOS3NNln 'QOOM3HOHS 30 1110 3Hl 2103 103f02id 1N3W3A021dW1 lllllin 8 133HiS 3NVI NNd'8'3NVI QOOM3dOHS '3NVI V 131AIH LL � ui r w w w w F U) LU w = CO a sNOisin3' a c o o V m N- o o o a ° Nos 10 VVVIi H ONVNOSI -n -C 1. 9 11tl01-Ad5 NWd51H11tlH1-l—AH IH ViOS3NNIW `QOOM3HOHS 30 AilO 3Hl 2 03 1O3f02id 1N3W3AOHdAl.11nin 8 1332i1S 3Nbl NNbW 8 `3Nt/l QOOM32iOHS `3Nbl b2i31A1b ye z O ¢ D co w w o = o CO o a SNOiSin3a CIFY Or SHOREWWOODD WTI rI WSB PROJECT NO.: 02925 -240 SCALE. DESIGN BY AS SHOWN WE PLAN BY CHECK BY DOE KAK M. 6- LL 00`-'3 0 LLJ F- O�ilz 0 Wow oLU oQO�t U) J W U W Z 2 O w o Z Z — 2 O <2� : OZ5 J O W LL af W W =) U Z M Q N NOTES & STANDARD PLATES c.P. SHEET 17-04 C0.03 AE- _ (D 3 STRAIGHT SAD .'S !/ �I 41AY BE USED / T i. WA_K -A A E O!/ ,S i �� X� — 8 % -IO% FLARE D O LR3 -RCN 0- C JT ER ',SLE J CA ✓v _KAS'._. ; DIAGONAL t _I:�.FACE TG PERPENDICULAR /Y FA�:�J MAX. ? HL" LLB F L f��` / 1,1 DA-. C _.F T CAL A % 0% -19% FLARE \OYES: \T N S S L E Cac D N WHARF P TE 4 C C FAR NG _S E l'J S 9 E R l %, Q T J R \ / 3` F p C €. N S G E R P THAN \ .,GIBS ., .' hT`H_ ', ROM THE BACK S CJF N 'H I. TL-- AI CI F E I H *'E "IS —CE, C%L+ F L R NC BLE OR ,A I U _ _ ANI Y JRB 1 NN N S EN II R C VERY 51 F " R --A!_ RIS_ 4 r�rti r14L E SURFACE L.,4G JL L rt.. \' @_I _LL _ _ GI AT -AN 5... /.. - PUAE FLfiR� = VT T V JC 4 CS CIS L T -D N BINFIKS All I .. / lJ C J., �j ISUP C TS S L E EU H -O'S CN F f i L S R - - C i' P S 1 E E EN 2 C-11 cl TP TF S S S C L N ,Jh VJST BL LNATF %C—P— AS 4 S .. .,N. V' - PAVES AN, _ A s FREE cTn LCT u.,s EusC a H IERED PERPENDTCULAR 1 S AST SE AR C Cl S C NAL R I P IE. C_ AI- C! ..H E o All E CA S E T L CVS CJ AN YJ DA �f p 2 3 MODIFIED FAN 10 T J P S111i ATC ADJACENT F C O �"� / J TG Ur -WAY y gC S [C R S HE LRS T E S. L \A 4 T4 RAMP ^� g/ I _J �> AT P, E T R L E E I 8 L RJ L-P RC I . T BACK OF i R _ � PAR. L A i 4 A -E7 R A I E CL R A' L F PE-' T E'ARh ".NGS CY S IC / 4 CJN ICC SU EN CF IA C. 4 E .0 CF . I 1 DT\ S \C OF 1 THIN P TR AR ! / .. .b �HCJL T J ER T V 2 F RAU G E ARC AR\ NSS S L B B P ,I BTY RS ] A ET 3 Y.4 b S 4 ✓ MIh o M k t V9 FC' BCL c . LYRi. C ELpR I T T H Cd IF.. PARALLE- D, � C A k CE -AN :'C3 R C AC. 1 AF 3" �' �3 G C-1 NI IA N 1E 'H 4 _.:I HC -S ND, P h Z'MIB. INS R AR' A N- E 1 -ET = F ,.L EF E N C C\ FIR 4 S 0\ F S C"A LVC C.,TTE AMF Rc„JiRE AID: RG T.,FNE B _V . -IC_A J_L B HE C 0 ETL A4 E l 111 B AR JI I IM1 1 1 I NUT I TO L TII --'N -1,3 C--':-'- C p T BL IN 1 ` Fx C F _E 3, < S H E P I � AR 0 T B K 11 , � - S T E -P E K I F N JL 0 I F ( F C OR ALL) _L 4`_ 41 !L N 4C !T FA S R ! FILL A S S 4 E SiC C P J „RE '2 F PR. RRD 1 I J HA C C TS L S_L L I S 0 4 C'S T -SEC ? e �� ; N E T Y NG S CR 31V:11-5 A R 4C L R JR', TC J T T P G HAZARDS A SA A& 1L R_ .. A SEC R, A / J A- L LS CPADE eA N CA- L T _SS L T BI L. .� PERPENGICIJLAR. T'ERED /DIAGCNAL i '. r K C 'A O 0 tiLS4CED AID A.L F CAL. USEC V �4 G.�L DT E. tAS]BLE C J > - +'E ?EEN Ci E t \D ' TER V11. RPC..IP G c yc - LEGEND �J T E LOA J N L S E N HP B T T P 1 L a 17—IS w R I E u P C e.3/ ov S. 2 FT h 4 V, iJ S R AN F U, C S A L S 4 M1 5 _'1M 1 Lik T1 S. C✓r �N /i F-` "..C� FT \ A P .ASL E SF LL N ? E �.0 / Jh�RE - -'-BE FT. .� A_2_D C S �J -S r AI P - -III- A- `SS ACT 0" TI All AND s DAN -I - �Cxn .,A C RCS S-I FE R E _.L L D 4F 7A 4 I ,. 5 N.---PIE :_e0 S 1 fx FAN C :N .LL ILLC :ONS 5 L F WI J .M PAS -1 DEPRESSED CORNER — — —� %- LA F 2. P eLmSEO. . PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP DETAILS REVISION; -INS B LINE "I -IEk 0 R L i T -MAX, ,J j ^�, APFRQVED: JAMJARY 23. 20LT pppR eC, SECTION c ,, 1 23 2017 STANDARD PLAN 5- 297,250 1 OF 6 - _ PARALLEL EL /DEPRESSED CORNER OE 9xx ®� SNAT- CIFY Or SHOREWWOODD WTI rI WSB PROJECT NO.: 02925 -240 SCALE. DESIGN BY AS SHOWN WE PLAN BY CHECK BY DOE KAK M. 6- LL 00`-'3 0 LLJ F- O�ilz 0 Wow oLU oQO�t U) J W U W Z 2 O w o Z Z — 2 O <2� : OZ5 J O W LL af W W =) U Z M Q N NOTES & STANDARD PLATES c.P. SHEET 17-04 C0.03 CITY OF SHOREWOOD WrI B WSB PROJECT NO.: 02925 -240 SCALE: DESIGN BY AS SHOWN DJE PLAN BY CHECK BY DJE KAK 5: z 00`x'3 0 OLI�jw O LL Fn w O LL O Q H H z U) J 0- LL W U O Z z w 0 Z z 0 F O <�LL�0 J O LL LL LL LL Z:) O z Q U) NOTES & STANDARD PLATES C.P. SHEET 17-04 CO.04 0T,- S; �ANJINGS SHALL BE _OC..TE A\YHHERE THE P-RESTRIA:J ACCESS NO— (PAR -HINGES THEECTTO! i E TOP F l -S THAT i R„N \Ik6 T. .! �I +A KAgLE All IF T AIPFOACNING DALE 'S IRSE GRAD -. RFACE I °T AL CL B III LANG NGS S : L 6A IvS P ., =ID J E . RO1 -E B -!'K ,C ..F CURB, N,iR 5 FROM TH. ACK OF C d '.HG THE R PPE:I D_Si ,OH 1 P ECAg V. -F\ THE IV AM? RDf H NG ALOPF IS CV =R SO =:. / IF C NELF1 R1.1 I K IC_ R- PF I F .. FO 1Y _3' IF \F ICAI. RTSE RAMR N k I IAH L S C8 F AT R 50 E. ' OO NTZ CT] b N > _ CChS H CTE 1 P D _Ak d:1 iFR Al. 1 D- =P SIA- 0 TS �� L SEE 4 THE C R.- RE k GF � R FL R 5 C C VT T .. K..7LE ., `�F _ES :A 7 BR THS IV P I\CI JL R C ::E PATH A.' —erg; C TH 3..TH CE A S A K NG S R B G ENS-I. i V " S' ~lam' T _ OF f I AMPS \ V A"_ L \C \C NF PROPER T R-_ R C A "D'M1 GS r L B S P L SI A i E NFO4 0.c4 OETAI�S 71 o PND O,' SE TH _�vk S A PRO,' �\ ROS ECLT I pCPH;_ n "= C AT H P C J '0 A AC T III A 1C . S' v THc` C C'S 0 LESS E v Q C RR APB S .I T.:H THE RAUP NCN- LKABL CPES T J GA B .ASH P FROM T BACK OF CLRB TO -nE PAR, A L RA^.AP P-S SYOA_C �. U NIM �" 3 \G I'll M1_ H. _J @S�yJ I f N!dll*� N DE E B —N I E JLRFD CR A 'M T CimBL_ -' NPZN: @GS ,o `y A L =o r G c FOP Ian C v TH P RA L c TAB E W\ NG E '1 r R - AVL �� s .. Cft F R. E vA K c CT E v i D LOS P I a IRC A, DIRECTIONAL RAMP WALKABLE 'rLARE r c �a _cTA RvIN„ PSI I N,� G A R �P IT 4 - OO A D[-[C-.B- `N V S _ h ]A G' THE 0- C . R_. 30N _4V?1 _ __- OF CL-TER E � \ G III' V 1 .A G. k_(FA\ v AhNvG I M .. 1 MCF "AC F3 C COMBIN D DIRECTIONAL 90 2' R- F ,c WHEN Jslno a T �oN� RAMP -]I -URB AHEN I,SIHC A RA- _ONG J Y I JTI 11 1,11ON -:F .l R Tn 7F COSIES PR FKR E_ � N \ D.S A FFQ IRFD B PEA\ Cl S. C4, 'H -'_ " IN BEIK aA MFS SI _„ NO1 B N I PATF g' D DL I A i S 1 IF J c, i O Y E CJ (, f L 2tS LO 'R L F N I N \ F I A F S AN FF -SIDE I -'7 I C r AC C NT 7C ^ _'MAX OR / gk K.�.B E L RA E : ^L S 5 C - F / 5 J;3. S ,1 8 S -C hH J SS fi ] L E " H B F C SI H C 'ALK X ;' "/ 'r -E l3 .N L ,I. _ :.JIVS F -A t EH ., A A ONS H N A .. :J T P \A L _ E..E R e,:%- �J AF_BS C / I __ CIF CTICNS ! �\ ,,.!L C `ER R T.. R F \ 4 F DS All T . S\ N 3 I _M1.,1—. X.21 N ,. Ik CII NS L OF CHILE ._ B.E .( OIL LiN 'J IT` I- �'r !}E,S A,_L dE �� G ` ` STR T C T GR I ..Jn_ N C__-" �.. \ / 'E CI E THE k F R'._ 4C\ AL B E SETBACK CR C S : C C ` 'H � '-+ C P NT F E F FT-C F \.NC S 1 1 5- C .I, %TU \ -N iAC NT C N4LK FOP J SJ I'D 1 a'wH 4 JA 0 NCV -N K ,E LRF E N \ C SET D AC:CAC U A NAL A E F�.CE S I \E AS ,i C SDR A l: T ..RE RANI l 1 Q HO RAISED DES .. E_ III CJ _ . S A E?I _ RA. /FRED.. BY A J 'R N C [ \ siJALEY L � c—, IF M1O1 N ZE _A C IR OF CTEO AND IS I L S T h 2] l_ O R^ J EFTA R �C; LE I.N.,S A g SETBACK JP TO FR t E x F L B hI -R ..ORNERS TSl 1 V COR IE A.. w:Dli TO I- rCl I F nNIY( F F 1 Wy SET ? R BP C LRB I 9" d C '_ PIPES J J �. C T BL N IN S AJJACER BA.,G C- CURB. P S ETB�.,. �P tFI .S _X..__v'_C LJ J FOR D k ..T ..l.., E.R F_ �v ]HE L T C A� E waF M1 ., _...,ED [ - BACK C H.,, � D "c'ED ABLE 4 =zJ -V CDV R N1 IF i L C HE *I. TP III 4 \4 I= EL .SNIT_ TH_ ....E ,.P 2 CBSTRL-T -TG _ FAITH P-` D STR.AN A _. STANDARD ONE DIRECTIONAL C ONE -WA`-' DIRECTIONAL WT.TE CETECTABL= HE coN a �` LK sH g - NS�R c E.PENDic_ z TaE BACK cF cuae. NA[NT h ET,NEEI CE C'NES 0 C \ 4EE. WARMING AT BACK CF CURB C IE ISER FOR A R C ICNAL PAIRS. M1 n DIMES AR E ALA„ HE BACK C� CDRB. C c COY..DR._TE OR-K- UML C S AC3RE _ BASE 1� THE T O.3 :-LDI\ L -OPE RANGES SF ,L BE T _-NRTFPC PC .F SITE LO% MIN. _ cOEDI IONS WARRAAT, O%A FI!N SLCPES D-F - 5.A% OR FL EA 2.0% MAX VAR. RAMP RIM? D[ ES C TP N ZAIF - S C C" E N 7 , R:F-VJL1 AND XIM N THE IRE CD S,C1N4 POP f_ _ CROS SLOPE SH LL n„ FAR, ED M1 I S C STF \: ANP 'E S B C LA ER E CA � ` i Ho THE E T ^L 41014k 9' a d. - _.,R ACE "` a LK SECTION K Is E HA v BIT x D 2E t. Y, ICA� S_DEWAT L _ x 9'nl x a N P E� cTa I Gr na OAK N1_T NSN IN ERSECTiON CORNER NT A AREA ' '- 6" CONCRETE WALK I c.0.. SLOPE .N ��L C.AE C.. A. I, SA WIDTH OR :NC,,FI \A PARS BACK Cc CDBB T ,.�0 "+ '_I\c / A0% -3.0% .( _URB HEIGHT GDTTEK SLOPE ,ANT D. OJT °ER CURB FOR DIRECTIONAL RAMPS C5 �w €tc4 RLmSEO. REVISION: PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP DETAILS APPRq VED:JANIN 23. 20I7 OB 9Ra® STATr - IN 1 -23 -2017 STANDARD PLAN 5- 297.250 2 OF 6 CITY OF SHOREWOOD WrI B WSB PROJECT NO.: 02925 -240 SCALE: DESIGN BY AS SHOWN DJE PLAN BY CHECK BY DJE KAK 5: z 00`x'3 0 OLI�jw O LL Fn w O LL O Q H H z U) J 0- LL W U O Z z w 0 Z z 0 F O <�LL�0 J O LL LL LL LL Z:) O z Q U) NOTES & STANDARD PLATES C.P. SHEET 17-04 CO.04 R n AF J E %s_T A .J 5ACR C J40/ F,/ jy EDCEV . i - J /H° O R E0 CJLSR 0 NSET E vcR, RAMP � � H CONCRETE WALK R E J B K C CORBP F OF lA K is (D V v IF, -T c' OUTFLOW GUTTER (� IT IT u. s �a J _. E zEao MIN. 'AF E1 \ \ HC) NLZ &/ IN_�/ P F �F W4I1 U Tl Cc iON PEREEED.0 -_AR C PEDESTRIAN ACCESS ROUTE CURB & GUTTER DETAIL _NSET A F4'Na F 5, T F PY INE / V\ v AS 21 e / OP'IONA= SILL CURB WHEN S "DFWALK �S AT BACK OF CURB FOR CURB MACHINE PLACEMENT AROLiNO RADII`S C c N rt_TE STL 0 s Ps_o DRY M1HEN C 'FIT _i .H THE P — ' GHT c A + ILA A - 29'- - YP-'AL ADA CURB EXTENSION WITH COMPOUND RADIUS (BUMP CUT) O S, L_ .LS TO T I E COMBINED DIRECTIONA (COMPOUND RADIUS) NOTES: PSS V 14GE L IHAI\ P III T—I F TH EJfS =EI H ACCESS R •_,.RI AT i. III .ELM. 'I F„J_ NT, IrA L I - IL, J IM AI2. V u_ ] _FR ILO N -L M1 E ATE 1 1%CH ,1 a S L ..... F `S P N ,1 H 9 TP L IS A S JE PR's LA3 TO THE 'TTR �C ; \E.° U. Pte_ in'C JC� _3 -_NDIC.A , 'En ED F� PFV.'DLAR,I 4_L ��. R_ _-AOCNAL R4A'S. US_ I- �'B Rn�*IPS h CE ='.- PRD-_ R„A 5 r -F- JF lE IS .SS -IED HOI P C�L F T H J- P F :N-.RSVP S LJ FANS 3 _PRESSED cCRNERS. N GJ - L ANSI JI c --TS :FE _JR3 R CO TH R S A_ IS \F VEIT C J[ \ 'NOI FS ..R.ATER THAI 14'. J KS F C -QCM TIE XIS NG ?0 J F HT of L DER, V S SE TCH 'F W G F I- T E X T] � '9 J,+sa L AIPS E WL CR _' S L LP S 'F'. sE T FOR C P C '\I- JRB S R;�L =A_tiS TC E'CNT P JE N J L_H WI RC C _0 ADJ EI F IF, I _ Tc - ^ of _ _L `ER 'a NLS n A Encc EDGE FAR JI <<R sH /aT =L D -am- C ° -J_C BE LSEC AT ',ESTIC _LY _ I TR4 NE., IR -S ..N A- A DRAIN-._E FG, �IM14 OR SJ—R EiE A __ R0ICIAr SEGI,7s L N L PH L d" L NL H F N \ F IN C EX T G N P AEI 1 H O L :M1T Cl, F c,- CE N s .'R R M1 s. P c n€ A ' NB �. rz DII CL ON— IC. HI JS S \ CL St CWS TH 4 NC IrHICLE P ]LE W17TIC CL RAI P L N X� 'SI N D BE JS .En C L ! .F 7 ,J J I JO f N P Dw _S w 1 - T P KI B �R. EX \ �CJL B C .SII.E E S NT INS 41 C C- S '.ITED. t BJTT9! .,S j- .H P ,I _RIA C SIN C __i BL .,M1 _C C4 iON E ._ >I .�.. 11z F A"E 2J ID KER _�-WE V�— AI E c O 1/2 ,E. -OP-ED JC N_ 'IL—ER =R MNGJT S °=C. 3702. `9 SENS— TO ±E SAME As w THICK—S, 4 M_.N. clry or SHOREWOOD WSB WSB PROJECT NO.: 02925 -240 SCALE. DESIGN BY AS SHOWN DJE PLAN BY CHECK BY DJE CAN O of LU w O W (n W O W OQ0OHHZ_ U) _ W O LL W z O W 0 — Z Z � 2 O < 2 of : �ozsJ OW LL af W W O z _j NOTES & STANDARD PLATES c.P. SHEET 17-04 c0.05 E':ICAL C -'. J rt I E 3 P ' CZ T MM TO .M_kT B V NSJS & < I Bl_. — , , _�'R T a RFp = INSET ,% +, 5 c NCR sz T. A—, T EIF \ : A -V= nI .. \ ..,JCPFT A. H .. PRU ERaEO TAPER ONLY ALLOA'c0 PER ENGINEER'S APPROVA_ Fs -A "` s;DEI PAVEMENT TREATMENT FCR OPTIONS IN FRONT OF CURB & GUTTER LIE IF ; J.RB RAP' RETRCFI ' GHT c A + ILA A - 29'- - YP-'AL ADA CURB EXTENSION WITH COMPOUND RADIUS (BUMP CUT) O S, L_ .LS TO T I E COMBINED DIRECTIONA (COMPOUND RADIUS) NOTES: PSS V 14GE L IHAI\ P III T—I F TH EJfS =EI H ACCESS R •_,.RI AT i. III .ELM. 'I F„J_ NT, IrA L I - IL, J IM AI2. V u_ ] _FR ILO N -L M1 E ATE 1 1%CH ,1 a S L ..... F `S P N ,1 H 9 TP L IS A S JE PR's LA3 TO THE 'TTR �C ; \E.° U. Pte_ in'C JC� _3 -_NDIC.A , 'En ED F� PFV.'DLAR,I 4_L ��. R_ _-AOCNAL R4A'S. US_ I- �'B Rn�*IPS h CE ='.- PRD-_ R„A 5 r -F- JF lE IS .SS -IED HOI P C�L F T H J- P F :N-.RSVP S LJ FANS 3 _PRESSED cCRNERS. N GJ - L ANSI JI c --TS :FE _JR3 R CO TH R S A_ IS \F VEIT C J[ \ 'NOI FS ..R.ATER THAI 14'. J KS F C -QCM TIE XIS NG ?0 J F HT of L DER, V S SE TCH 'F W G F I- T E X T] � '9 J,+sa L AIPS E WL CR _' S L LP S 'F'. sE T FOR C P C '\I- JRB S R;�L =A_tiS TC E'CNT P JE N J L_H WI RC C _0 ADJ EI F IF, I _ Tc - ^ of _ _L `ER 'a NLS n A Encc EDGE FAR JI <<R sH /aT =L D -am- C ° -J_C BE LSEC AT ',ESTIC _LY _ I TR4 NE., IR -S ..N A- A DRAIN-._E FG, �IM14 OR SJ—R EiE A __ R0ICIAr SEGI,7s L N L PH L d" L NL H F N \ F IN C EX T G N P AEI 1 H O L :M1T Cl, F c,- CE N s .'R R M1 s. P c n€ A ' NB �. rz DII CL ON— IC. HI JS S \ CL St CWS TH 4 NC IrHICLE P ]LE W17TIC CL RAI P L N X� 'SI N D BE JS .En C L ! .F 7 ,J J I JO f N P Dw _S w 1 - T P KI B �R. EX \ �CJL B C .SII.E E S NT INS 41 C C- S '.ITED. t BJTT9! .,S j- .H P ,I _RIA C SIN C __i BL .,M1 _C C4 iON E ._ >I .�.. 11z F A"E 2J ID KER _�-WE V�— AI E c O 1/2 ,E. -OP-ED JC N_ 'IL—ER =R MNGJT S °=C. 3702. `9 SENS— TO ±E SAME As w THICK—S, 4 M_.N. clry or SHOREWOOD WSB WSB PROJECT NO.: 02925 -240 SCALE. DESIGN BY AS SHOWN DJE PLAN BY CHECK BY DJE CAN O of LU w O W (n W O W OQ0OHHZ_ U) _ W O LL W z O W 0 — Z Z � 2 O < 2 of : �ozsJ OW LL af W W O z _j NOTES & STANDARD PLATES c.P. SHEET 17-04 c0.05 CITY OP SHOREEWWOODD WTI rI WSB PROJECT NO.: 02925 -240 SCALE: DESIGN BY AS SHOWN DJE PLAN BY CHECK BY DJE CAN M. 5. H. O ow F F O z 0 i ED C/) w 0 LU 0 Q LLJ 0 c) � c_ U) J Lo U L L z O LU o Z z — Of = 0 <��LL�0 J 0 w LL ui /z 0 af (Y Q U) NOTES & STANDARD PLATES C.P. SHEET 17-04 C0.06 FACE CETECTASLE EN RE IT P51PR �E� �J RR _IJ ., OIDlIO A - C ATC, IV L CE Fd .. HT ,. E CAR -i _ACE \ (AB,. - \ s/ FL4R? F PE 4_KABL A�, Y ..LPFAC FFV :. -BARE E REST Ulle"IA L+A C R N -IGHT 4 PRRED A S 4CS/ VG S�Rr ACS PAS E. LRE ES LFAS_ :RID A ,D .T :A.F IF _I PBI ACJ..� \N: `C KL6LE SID-ACE .oP A >s-u E ' 1 ._.JR_E A As ^s Tv - DETECTABLE EDGE WITH a - CURB AND GUTTER F ES A'4M1 i GATE kR41 FJ I -ROAD 5.14 n _E L E\_/ L RE tEM F- FA A E_ T RAILROAD CROSSING AOJAC_V AI T„A ! ,kALKAe_E ETAC_ i ,A PLAN VIEW sE of 6R__ A . S_ IDA10 _ ANA i .t su_ET Fc II[S RA-_A "._ JFT .,__ AANN'.NG R'�: ANSU A JE... EC BL O GR \II \G A /_E SLR—CE . CE =I'F aS `' PA'rEC SJF A_ A]^JA V A CCFB RAOP AI.'CC'Ji -RFJ. D OBCiACL_ III- CCL_R JIS ?' --JLY 3 TRAY —11 11 PY n WYO SLAL-` _BPA DETECTABLE EDGE WITHOUT CURB AND GUTTER CON A. T_ -CARE L M1� AS 1DJk I, _ NON -AA SEAT- _ lUF ,._FS s D_LC eE .:aN E LeIG A L L LABOR ;Acu I:;E eac GF BEIc J13f4 E 2 F 11, 4 CJR5 AND 3' IG'. -LIB. SI F \:.- S ADP, ',,AB _ al P S Ai"J FO J IF A F\ �(' 1S J E C S E'ELJ ..RC \C T.. JS - - J.R . fE DDI —rE'i S�i_ D I_ \� .F IR S Ot THE I,M1 B.+_E N ,.IM1 +EkANCE J R'A JC _ ? A F P R ChS E A I ANC lIi A IVn TFJ C:N .:.ACTS. —Y'—CAL—Y —D SIR D-1 ADS M1 ^_ "L, WHEN f C `N FETE C G E CV K BE F FI M1J C J J R EJC L` C 0 D S IN .i /J \ F C'v J C C CC \CRETE. GPADFD A'. ES No J ^N L TE L v r E J_.o TA 5_E 111,S SF L B L ° FROnJ T�i P TL 1 E NC DR E T 1 M1 L R E 1 ATH F 0 N AST. NV \ z 8O ,1L R C A CCf' INJ DETEry aB E OE F S: _" ]M1P \y/ E c P E c E A E PRE N E CURB 1 i'R AR nE N E\ T Ti P S TS `AI r E - N. 4 RT /z,: JET B M1 S L S M1'.II N J L:B 1 IL V CJM1E C F CSI N\ F C P . E M1 AF \C S\ H i O C N[ `RE ETA 9L ID07 All I P E C S V C ti ! Y ACCASSTRI C,RS. „N T OF E A C! Z O C 4 . 1E\ B 0 C TEC 4 U V C R OF SUTTEE E[A S �C F !_ \T b S ARE VC N D C . PR NJ AIPED N F3AB N.TM V I R3. PR,ACH M1.SE -El vJ V LC R J C3 NO C 3LIf'F k L I AR s —XV CIA L IN �M1 _ - L L.�F ei �lti4T E 5 ? Z N'- f 0 P VD IS CJ -J 11 F N F i D J nA E NCJ 2 :._ :� T': � J R E \T X 1 S =H M1 RE t, IN-7-41 I %]vl L V THE L_ i HS ,7 ( .,M1� vA \- -., -Al CJRn , -EN TIE i Jl c yIJnE iAl _ B-LCN n! a CiT C RE R IER TO S—TS & 2 TC .CDLFY TEE F3 LEI31- P _ ANO M \TA N "�_ ' I � v E 5 G'� C L E 5LC a N Jn S ALL B 2':,11 FLA IA RCM THE 2 E T L F F K 1 N? IF JC \ST JC SB L E ETECT L IA A 1113 .. P -RAN 12 S N L -0 IE ST L 47� IS :Rr E '� OF a DENA =K O ^-'NRE\ PEDES -D A\ CA ES AR_ R„ .JE- _ET CT A ,. N: G SURFACES S1 __ i LY On E r SE —1- P Iz R E TF P A N- SL GATE F T R F IC VT TYPICAL SIDE TREA.ihEN O�rIT?Ns OO a / ",, _ 6" \� J f JR l i Al 2 ] ]I D P C.,TS C C E 0. M1 K C TAPE E iTH. A z 1 0 Z AIS / F T^R s \ E B PC :, c 0 J C -SE s. D S ., .'N. FSCM AC_ T C_A F ., E., S C-11. T n S_,T 01 E -E FINS, I- I III- -AR-'N,,'. ST',”, `F, SCJU ✓,..,R ANA GI—Le 19, CJ,AN-FRI,- SBEPORTS. PEDESTRIAN APPROACH r�p�a0?, RENIS -FO. REVISION; NOS DETA L /T PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP DETAILS APFR VED AMJAR 23 20LT < ,R. f C L \CD ='AB t' ofinn PR SIDE D -j ' ✓iN� ' F��Qp POE 1 23 2017 STANDARD PLAN 5- 297,250 4 OF 6 9N EIGIIEII CITY OP SHOREEWWOODD WTI rI WSB PROJECT NO.: 02925 -240 SCALE: DESIGN BY AS SHOWN DJE PLAN BY CHECK BY DJE CAN M. 5. H. O ow F F O z 0 i ED C/) w 0 LU 0 Q LLJ 0 c) � c_ U) J Lo U L L z O LU o Z z — Of = 0 <��LL�0 J 0 w LL ui /z 0 af (Y Q U) NOTES & STANDARD PLATES C.P. SHEET 17-04 C0.06 CIFY Or SHOREWOOD WrI EW B WSB PROJECT NO.: 02925 -240 SCALE. DESIGN BY AS SHOWN DJE PLAN BY CHECK BY DJE CAN 5: LLH 00`x'3 0 C) LLJ O w O W (n W O W 0 0 H H Z_ U) 0 J W U LL W z g 0 W 0 Z Z O <2� : ozs J O W LL Qf W LL O /z (Y Q U) NOTES & STANDARD PLATES C.P. SHEET 17-04 CO.07 e IujLT A I WALKA9L£ h S .NO _ HE G--LE HE G-- H V CURB INTERSECTION _ AT I t _ - I PEo-sTRIAN =ATN F -.. � Jw AJ _ - - -� — —7l OF ;RAVEz 1Di M1., RAH/1 �J mil' / I V CURB ADJACENT 0 LANDSCAPE Fx S *ra J B S_3ErlR A - OH EXS VG" / �II E \ I ^ F. k15.In .LK ; " l ✓2" �. � H j ABLE V CURB ADJACENT C BUILDING -- - — 6, OR BARRIER V CURB AD ;A CENT LANDSCAPE CJRB c s c4 v / ARJ StIRH 3L —DE SI rI-K M1'ITS a =9 �.C� CJR F - SEMI - DIRECTIONAL RAMP :3,4,9) 3'DOnE S��BACK,u N„ RAMP AVD P..cL BUT C 9 =ROr," HE BACK CF C-RI F 'VAERl JSEJ FOR -S APILICA .ONS B DOES OCT C v IN-E PAST T=L °US CN (C ., ` SID SALK? -- - -- - - - -- 4 HIT. IN TRANSITION PAWL F2�A S 'liSH ICSIANCE FROM NOTES; aNCE APE PDSy _ - B N E CE SIC idT_K E— E N T6 ED-E I -K IA E L 4 N ,C FLAP R E V LARE IS 't F E V P:✓:ES n,- I S \ `K ti Iv„T e= �C _C y� . CJRg ry -C„R9 Aa-I D �.. TO A A B E DRF E. C4 h +EN IN- RIAV A`H C TRAv_L OF A v- __ '_ _____ __ L N BF 'ON TP ._RSS tiE -E. ON >T AL CURB S R _T.� :H -S - T- I,=T N C..N,, WA C N-S. 6" SIDE R INC---CT-AEI Li DWS. JSE J CJE5 CJ C B_ ',H I IZET GRADING A, ,ISEN 7. 'DR g_gLgg = L F 0 LNG AB A ENT RA NE%- IS PR ERRED. 4 LSF ST-TON STAT .,P P,_ S IiL B L:G. L 8 L C E E S]DE14 115 45HE FT R'A- LLC NR. At' J:'L IS J:' 7-1-K C .BETE. NEXT T L D-10 _.,. _ B_ A V I ,-IC WHALE . A R' ._w I0. IC IFV TI Si.JTTON - 3' L "FDI TAC FO-NE 'oN ST A-1- o L _ F IEE LA :L I us ". P : :EA -1 E P TAR C P +N 9 L H NTH CL,.Rt V�. CN. I F F� 9 .,r.._ CJRB; _ _ J 3J_N F,SC ..AKI �i FS T �S IOh A N INFLA E E L rcAET 1. R \__A RB STAFF EATCH EC--CV 07 ADJACEN- D E B N-EN A IR AID -%P A S R JP 'HA- AV APS F SF 41 TOR "2E kE .1 B IS C 6 N k 5 TJR JC P -SD -C3. <5 7C _ �DF. G _ IA I n x R.TE o o _ TP NSI SI r .NTA3 -CO- 01 _DE Lac P R N PERCENT RT S s c E N e eEAI +� DR L51 L Ton RJ a E IS F A H BL lP L.,J.AI A S TC uCI H, 0 CJ C S 0T L N -1 %1 4 L JSED 3 RAdP A¢EDEE L,N5 CL£ rC C49 " _ E P., -'CHI T .._ S T .,N,. o E S F RC L GREA 4 -' 2.0%. LEGEND el ve T- AA- HE of zHE� i 3TE L N I J NAL c s r {ES s L T4{= P N P- r oJBE — N T D HIE S S i- TO 3 I A Q 'ET—IS P E N F 3 L P STILL E .v / N / MAX Dl U 1, 4 1 S�IOr1! IF NN FEC SLJ '.,. L C EX-LSD I I'OP OF f'(ALKj- I', �: TC J N4 =K i R X M1�.1 h J PF E REC i`JS \S \ .AY �- C/ 5 . F \ L 71 _T .. N, _hJIN, S{ R I . ", F .,F .R..O Iti„ PASS. —v-F :A3x N F T "ON PANEL(Sl BE LSE CP. T = C \I!G -IC PC SLO' .1 1 E S I� 1 l ISSS S_CP _ 11 'RARE [ICV III-L" -S. � O- L S IC CA WOK SE- TS S T A, C1� IS =ORMA Ty NEC] ON B -B sFc -,3H 4 , SIGNAL PEDESTAL & PUSH BET -3N (V -CURB) PUSH BUTTON STATION (V -CURB) RENISFD. aEVISION. PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP DETAILS ^I�, �, APDRq VED:JANIN 23. 2017 -Yv ppcwL'A �j F��Qp ✓+N 1 -23 -2017 STANDARD PLAN 5- 297,250 5 OF 6 _ OB 9Ra® CIFY Or SHOREWOOD WrI EW B WSB PROJECT NO.: 02925 -240 SCALE. DESIGN BY AS SHOWN DJE PLAN BY CHECK BY DJE CAN 5: LLH 00`x'3 0 C) LLJ O w O W (n W O W 0 0 H H Z_ U) 0 J W U LL W z g 0 W 0 Z Z O <2� : ozs J O W LL Qf W LL O /z (Y Q U) NOTES & STANDARD PLATES C.P. SHEET 17-04 CO.07 CITY OP SHOREWOOD WSB WSB PROJECT NO.: 02925 -240 SCALE. DESIGN BY ASSHCWN DJE PLAN BY CHECK BY DJE KAK 5. A. O ow O F F �ilz p W � w O w O � c_ u2i): J � W U L LL LL � z O w o z z - = O <LL�0 J Ow LL af w LE O /z (Y Q EV) NOTES & STANDARD PLATES c.P. SHEET 17-04 C0.08 T2 \ \ T, VAVA I. \ \ :L SI L IL _, 4,fL JM1 R '.E AJC j'� �a0isr'm wFJE'' 1".LN S: SEA A II%6 �\ VA / - N a -- ti ,I E u , \ \ \~ Cu F _ ! \ �. tLq�LING 6' \ \ \ \ \ \ w CJ A..., JLEla4D ApEA !'ALK T P CAU �T, .. ., ., V OPTIONAL SIDEWALK. REINFORCEMENT EoGE IF T.1111111 FANE t F P E _ hR �Nt c .. CvLY R .,FIEC� Loz MIN. 5.0'/, MAX. EXPANSION MATERIAL PLACEMENT FOR OPTIONAL CURB LINE REINFORCEMENT C io% MIN. M CONCRETE AND BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS PLACEMENT ON BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS _.OZ MAX. P 36 ZMIX. EDGE OF L�RJJGN SANE e _nL cK .Ea 4 \ \- PEDESTRIAN RAMP PEDES_RIAN RAMP p2 \ \\ UP O 2.0% 2 0/ MAX. OR LP \ \ \ CHANCE TO 4% CF,AIVGE DP iC 2.0/ 2.0% MA% 03 LP DF -0 2_0% C4ANCE 'C 4/ " CHANGE ANGR \ \� S4. GAT FLOW LINE PROFILE TABLE" - TWIN PERP NDTCULARS _ „-� FOR usE cN cuae RA P R aCT T; AEA -i PROP SEJ eva3 _uECJ .AIND VU ILK ,_� ' I \ "� \ \ \ -1:TTER PEDESTRIAN RAMP RE IN` JRGEIMENT � u F \ JP TO 20 2.0'/. MA% OR JP w TO 4% CRANE uP TO 2.OX �� v NaN E =DANCE OPTIONAL CURB SINE REIVFGRCE'XENT DETAILS FLOW L_NE PROFILE 14TA61 E'' 1.0% MIN. \ f .......... 5.0% MAX. PEDESTRIAN RAMP :- DESTRIAN FIND \ TD NiOINC II _ M \ C/ MIN = 1 0% MIN. 0% MIN 1.0/ M V I.0% M'N. \ NO MAX = 1 / PREFERRED ..0% MAX 15% PPEF�RRED :_ �.G' /, MAX. �ANGI \ FLOW LINE PROFILE PASE - TWIV PERPENi_CJLARS ti 3 \ ti PECESTRIAN RAMP 2” j� MAX_ �\ / /T .0/ MIN I.C% MIN. IO/ MI.N 3� SE•• Y6 M` X. \ 5,0% 4AX. :.5% PRE ERRED 5.0% MAX. j ^X, FRI. \2' FLOW LINE PROFILE RAISE - FAN CJRB LINE AND ROAD CROSSING ADJUSTMENTS LANDING ,J POUR REINFORCEMENT I INC CF ,ISIS I(S S . +MITT N I'SS T A A, P T - IN Rf S": LK. ---TOTES: S GUI E N RC h f IS N A C ] C D 1 N DD NE -C- _CCP_ ALLOR'S. O TC E SLRE G L N YGS P PR ERL CJN RL iE M1 I T A J A R M1 L .'ACE h J T J PR C FUL N L E - R,,,,ECz� IR NV N P'� 4 E AN F F A4J PL C 5 P ?R .cL A NDE IJEN OM1 i� P�L. REA FJ C 5 R V JR I ^ -`_ L vN F R �CLREJ T .T A- rJD _'�= . 'TA„�,. C. ,, -: E C CS IAIK .LL rtry Eh _w5'n_E. O C ILL .CL N L3 k lFO. ME 5 CE �rc L= I P J T TABLFG C L E J N- C E -T D 4AI , i C FL �'F 0 .- ER %BA 0 EL Dvl: L M TCN F R D'. IS a G IR 7,1E E F E T A PE L, G_S 1� MEY J V T EXTEND IITC P LAN N 3LE H= _ A t '.0 21 JR ..� '.J CRI L AND GR L 2 C X 2 CDC P N-0 Eh TARS ^JL AS CSSI6 -. { — T __��.ING .. F.T :2IF, R NAI KENT JI FAR C V T _CTL I JC J S 'NI R D liS. C .�rtC SL J. T F rJ 2)l,11 O SLRr= OF RC 0 K J TP 0 '-I PB M1F P fEN -T CIE GR. BE - C A "TA'„L-' FL..N LINE _ TO IC _,3E -CRP ;IC S_-,Br N FICI- C ECESTRIAN RAMP L E N B NI\ .,S O..ull...S FE ECC.I N HE PL4N. UP is 2: CH V_ I FLXW LIN v1J. EXIST NC S CPE B YC NE PEOES R AN CLRB RAUR K 2 E. . EFORM CII '1LE4 NA -R ?L ?ER N JAG z S. _.r STA D �..N- A'EA 4 �R -FSTS: LL MILL & OVA _AY C3 ERT4 B . ti_VE , <MEN? R .� CONE n :TH d JMI40U PL �N.N =G `0% _. JM NODS RO DAAYS Au0 FL .TI 1110\ C N C CN. R E o Nl ♦p €3G' RFUISEm REVISION IA-I,-Ir IF N F 2 Cc . IN E I c NsTR v o a AI E TPE R m_c- T_ PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP DETAILS c r P T a s C s RICH s E LE R N., TR F LLCw APFR VED ANJAR 23. 20LT C VC A--i PCS E D pR R1 �� GI : FE E R N AV ETA DRAINAGE Ip 23 2017 STANDARD PLAN 5- 297,250 6 OF 6 AD R., J..F AN Cl,CNAV ..,. S S—,I BE . e FP F ZJX A OE 9pp�� CITY OP SHOREWOOD WSB WSB PROJECT NO.: 02925 -240 SCALE. DESIGN BY ASSHCWN DJE PLAN BY CHECK BY DJE KAK 5. A. O ow O F F �ilz p W � w O w O � c_ u2i): J � W U L LL LL � z O w o z z - = O <LL�0 J Ow LL af w LE O /z (Y Q EV) NOTES & STANDARD PLATES c.P. SHEET 17-04 C0.08 TT TN= A 11NIT11Y 5EWER RANIOLE Spee al Dela is THRUST BLOCK WAT 4 hS7,FC D R SANITARY SEWER SERVICE 'CONNEC7'ION A Z'H Spec a1 Detail, AIR BLEED MR A' 11 N 1 2 1 1 1 K, Sp,,iEl D,C11, C Sp,,W D061, MANDREL DETAIL r_ IAN 1� lylIC/T INTERSECTION Z-2N. )ERT=NT TO Special Details TYPICAL HYDRANT IN5TAL LVTIC N W'- or SHOREWOOD A WSB 'd11111111111111111M VV3B PROJECT NO, 02925-240 ALE DESIGN BY AS SHOWN DUE —C BY CHECK BY BEE KAK z ,5` "K. 0 of z �— C) LU o LU 0 LL, ED C/) ow 0� LLJ W z 0 Z > >- tz Z 0 u2i J LLJ LL Ld Z 2 o LU Z z 0 < < 0 2 : ozs J 0 Lu p: LL af W Ld Z:) 0 o5 U) of _J DETAILS C.P. SHEET 17-04 1 c0.09 Eawu ain ovaaavouEO )% WA CM ett INSULATION DETAIL D T Spee al Deta Is FLARED END SECTION AND TRASH GUARD 510 DS PxaNxE,=a,Ax,xs.MEx. AxaP.ax� "� aa.E GATE1 VALVE AND BOX � vEO,Ems rneucnrsm a1 Specal Details RU7L OUTL AT OETS 510 —'I2 ® ka.�xxa.a _ Specal Detals CATCH BASIN MANHOLE 510 p4 a s�� a eiTUwixous AMTEPIN coxcvsTS CUVSaxo ax..Ex TYPICAL CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER Specal Deta is RDW 04 Specal Details CATCH BASIN 2 X 3 BOX 510 -05 Speo ig Details CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER RADIUS RUW -05 cLry or SHOREWOOD WSY AMMEMEM WSB PROJECT NO 02925 -240 SCALE. DESIGN BY AS SHOWN DJE PLAN BY CHECK BY DJE BAN N Z O K A aka 0of w 0 W (n W LL O W O Q H H Z_ U) J W O LL W z 2 O w o Z z — x 0 <LL�0 J O w LL W LU 0 Z Q U) DETAILS C.P. SHEET 17-04 C0.10 F� °� °ax..xAxs.Dxx�xDD �,x Mx..xAxs.Dx�„ -' C,II CURB & GUTTER Specal Deta is CONSTRUCTION AT CATCH BASIN ID-1 a. IDS mwaxreo mc�aiu 0 I �� x.n Mix. w.E.EV D, aiaE �s - I D II D II saecm ®x woo. Spee al Deta Is BEDDING METHODS FOR RCP AND DIP BED 02 ax,�sx�.�Dx�Pxw�.o�w � �,xs.�xo x�xos sDVMSevEn mxcraLEa aicuxD � e,.. msE Da eixoEv Specal Details TYPICAL MANHOLE OR CASTING ADJUSTMENT Row -18 IIO, =M1� x�E.�D.PPE =P MDx Specal Details z< IMPROVED FOUNDATION FOR RCP AND DIP BED -03 se�awe¢ouao ou✓ueae PDS. 3 o�PO�.rxEP.x owDxxxo.MELaE DxExoxEEx L� N I---.I Mx.�x. Exs�Dx D,.xEMx. xE �Tlx� iuo.loca,DV.xox . soaaavwso Eaua TYPICAL STREET & TRAFFC sIN — LLATON Specal Deta is RDw 20 �j O° Q� 0� O° O° OG O o °�o °O000 Oo OOo Oo� O O U °OG OoODO� 0 oo C O�O�O�O aM D,xD�x � Specal D,1, 1, ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE E10-11 m Y or SHOREWOOD =_Ix ,II Mix.— owwerev Dr awe I I SY WSB PROJECT�: 02925 -240 mxsoEV[a ixooea.aL SCALE. DESIGN BY AS SHOWN DUE =U'I_ PLAN BY CHECK BY DEE BAD z z _ Special Details BEDDING METHODS J- 2111 FOR PLAS C PIPE„ BED -01 xoo vixcss.�LSOSwi.x newwss. DxwDDx PDn�w�.x �.�� Special Details S15 DUTY ILT FENCE ERO -D3 w K A Ewa O oW F F O LU z O W � W LL O W O Z >O H Z U) J W U LL W z g 0 W 0 zz -�xo <2 �: OZ5 J O W LL af W W O Z Q U) DETAILS c.P. I SHEET 17-04 c0.11 SP 0 Gal D 506 INLET PROTECTION — CATCH ° BASIN INSERT AFTER PAVING ERO M CLry OF SHOREWOOD WSY AMMEMEM WSB PROJECT NO 02925 -240 SCALE. DESIGN BY AS SHOWN DJE PLAN BY CHECK BY DJE CAN Eu EEO rinw I fn Z O K Delon, ERO -07 A aka Oof w O W (n w LLO W I J 02 LL W U W z 2 O w o zz -, xo <LL�0 J O w LL W W O Z Q U) DETAILS C.P. SHEET 17-04 C0.12 FF% N 0 60 120 H iiiiiiiiia SCALE IN FEET ,': ----j CITY or y � SHORRWOOD `-i WSB W3B PROJECT NO.: rI I 02925 -240 SCALE. DESIGN BY ASSHOWN DJE PLAN BY CHECK BY 06.04 i S ii r DJE CAN Z c O w K A Otriz O LL W (n W W 0 0 0 H H z_ U) J W U LL W z 20 W 0 Z — o <LL�0 J O W LL af W W =) O z >Q05 V) GENERAL LAYOUT c.P. I SHEET n -04 C1.01 t 0� Gideon B Solberg E X OF�O PLEASANT AVE Point y Duck Frog A�EN1 ORCHARGO y Island Island _ � cIR 2 - Q n DR � O �P o �° G L D O \ O' �� - � CAM LEE RD. 19 ✓ALLEYWO NE LA. �� < < z NELSNE O Q Q Q J O v VALE � GLEN � RD. DR. z 'A /I 0 �e 1 1 O �� W C � � �� Q � CE d o 0�� LW W p0 y 19 s HARDING AVE Q o z OR NKA P 01 �� STAR y ° 19 co -Y�j SM RD. v �� 0 7H rOWN Q Q cIR z 101 sMiTR owN R GILLE�� 0 9 � �P uL Ro. a City CLOVE E o M Q — Q 0� Hall o LA. M �/� L < Lg1N J y m m ECHO ELDER -- ° H U A CR Z� G RIDGE POINT a ACA CZ (n > MANN LA. P� L EMY AVE (n Q CI R � � ➢ o � �P < F Q 1Y0 Z C PARK S Y C� e T. o 0 0 0 y Q Q v TR. o Z y c w y Z Z Q w O Z GALPIN LA BRACKETTS RD VIEW w Z� YELLO STONE> X11 Q ES I n d �y /C� y v� W / n�AgY �� MURRAY ST. 0 �R�E'u OR d �� \n n g0 TF Q >�FLOWER 0 OD OR �0 0 0 RC y STRATFOR WI L7SEY LA,O �D. COMMA y o OHO PL. y E y U7 P o 27 T11 7N T117N o R23W 41 G R23W 117 )� D- 3 334 34 g \I 4 413 i VV T116N T119N N LEGEND PBOaosED DETOUR 0 00 120 IT SCALE IN FEET CrEy or SHOREWOOD WSB WSB PROJECT NO.: 02925 -240 SCALE. DESIGN BY AS SHOWN DOE PLAN BY CHECK BY DJE CAN z s 0 Cd � I� =0 UT 5 - > n o o a 82 'p) . o a S mS Oow F W LL O w O O z H } z L LAC LA x IL O U cn — Z20U w z O w 0 Z Z O < <�LL�0 O O w LL w w =) O Z Q U) PROPOSED DETOUR ROUTE C.P. SHEET n -oa C1.02 SHOREWOOD LANE RI VV I I 25 RIGHT OFVJAY 14' TO BACK OF CURB VARIES SURMOUNTABLE CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER 6" SELECT TOPSOIL BORROW AND SOD 2" TYPE SP 9.5 BITUMINOUS WEARING COURSE (SPWEA240C) 23 5] BITUMINOUS TACK COAT 2" TYPE SP 12.5 BITUMINOUS WEARING COURSE (SRNEB240C) 8" AGGREGATE BASE, CLASS 5 (100% CRUSHED ROCK) 24" SELECT GRANULAR BORROW GEOTEXTILE FABRIC (TYPE V) APPROVED SUBGRADE 6" SELECT TOPSOIL BORROW AND SOD RIVIERA LANE R/W R/W R/W C[TY OF 25' RIGHT OF WAY I 25' RIGHT OF WAY I ORRWOD 14' TO BACK 14' TO BACK HO I I SY OD 25' RIGHT OF \NAY 2.50% 2.50q„OURIIOU CURB AND GUTTER VARIES WSB PROJECT NO.: 14' TO BACK 02925 -240 OF CURB SURMOUNTABLE CONCRETE ry CURB A UP GUTTER VARIES SCALE. DESIGN BV. AS SHOWN DJE F _ �- PLAN BY CHECK BY DJE KAK 6" SELECT TOPSOIL BORROW AND SOD 6" SELECT TOPSOIL BORROW AND SOD 2" TYPE SP 9.5 BITUMINOUS WEARING COURSE (SPWEA240C) 23 5] BITUMINOUS TACK COAT 2" TYPE SP 12.5 BITUMINOUS WEARING COURSE (SRVEB240C) 8" AGGREGATE BASE, CLASS 5 (10D% CRUSHED ROCK) 24" SELECT GRANULAR BORROW GEOTEXTILE FABRIC (TYPE V) APPROVED SUBGRADE 6" SELECT TOPSOIL BORROW AND SOD N Z c O N W K A a�- O�z O ) LI) w O w O z > H } z ul Q O ~ 0-W U LL � z W � z - O 1 w O < 2 = : of �J Ow w w Z:) O z Q V) TYPICAL SECTIONS C.P. SHEET n -04 C2.01 RIVIERA LANE R/W R/W I 25' RIGHT OF WAY I 25' RIGHT OF WAY I 14' TO BACK 14' TO BACK VARIES CURB MOUNTABLE 4ND GUTTER CONCRETE 2.50% 2.50q„OURIIOU CURB AND GUTTER VARIES 6" SELECT TOPSOIL BORROW AND SOD 2" TYPE SP 9.5 BITUMINOUS WEARING COURSE (SPWEA240C) 23 5] BITUMINOUS TACK COAT 2" TYPE SP 12.5 BITUMINOUS WEARING COURSE (SRVEB240C) 8" AGGREGATE BASE, CLASS 5 (10D% CRUSHED ROCK) 24" SELECT GRANULAR BORROW GEOTEXTILE FABRIC (TYPE V) APPROVED SUBGRADE 6" SELECT TOPSOIL BORROW AND SOD N Z c O N W K A a�- O�z O ) LI) w O w O z > H } z ul Q O ~ 0-W U LL � z W � z - O 1 w O < 2 = : of �J Ow w w Z:) O z Q V) TYPICAL SECTIONS C.P. SHEET n -04 C2.01 R/W 6" SELECT TOPSOIL BORROW AND SOD BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY REPLACEMENT 3" TYPE SP 9.5 BITUMINOUS WEARING COURSE (SPWEA240B) 6" AGGREGATE BASE, CLASS 5(100% CRUSHED ROCK) (INCIDENTAL) °I CONCRETE DRIVEWAY REPLACEMENT 6" CONCRETE(MNDOT 3Y41) 6" AGGREGATE BASE, CLASS 5 (100% CRUSHED ROCK) (INCIDENTAL) 2" TYPE SP 0.5 BITUMINOUS WEARING COURSE (SPWEA2400) 2351 BITUMINOUS TACK COAT 2" TYPE SP 12.5 BITUMINOUS WEARING COURSE (S%VEB240C) 3" AGGREGATE BASE, CLASS 5 (100% CRUSHED ROCK) GEOTEXTILE FABRIC (TYPE V) APPROVED SUBGRAOE YELLOWSTONE TRAIL BITUMINOUS PATCH 6" TYPE SP 9.5 BITUMINOUS (NEARING COURSE (SPWEA240C)(MINIMUM) 5" AGGREGATE BASE, CLASS 5 (100% CRUSHED ROCK) (MINIMUM) CONCRETE PEDESTRIAN RAMP 6" CONCRETE (Mn /DOT 3M41) 6" AGGREGATE BASE, CLASS 5 NOD% CRUSHED ROCK) (INCIDENTAL) 6" SELECT TOPSOIL BORROW AND SOD V) Z O 1 W K A 6w< O of w O W (n W LL O W OQ00 tz U) J W U _ LL W z 20 W 0 Z z O <LL�0 J O w LL W W O Z Q V) TYPICAL SECTIONS C.P. SHEET n -04 C2.02 MANN LANE c[TV OF R/W S WORRSWO RD V rI 33 TO 41.5' RIGHT OF WAY - W3B PROJECT NO.: I I 02925 -240 13' TO BACK 13' TO BACK - -- OF CURB F SC SCALE. DESIGN BY [- SURMOUNTABLE CONCRETE ��ECURB UROUN TABLE CONCRETE SHO \VN DJE VARIES CURB AND GUTTER 250% 2.50% CURB AND GUTTER VF` RIES PLAN BY CHECK BY DJE KAK 2" TYPE SP 0.5 BITUMINOUS WEARING COURSE (SPWEA2400) 2351 BITUMINOUS TACK COAT 2" TYPE SP 12.5 BITUMINOUS WEARING COURSE (S%VEB240C) 3" AGGREGATE BASE, CLASS 5 (100% CRUSHED ROCK) GEOTEXTILE FABRIC (TYPE V) APPROVED SUBGRAOE YELLOWSTONE TRAIL BITUMINOUS PATCH 6" TYPE SP 9.5 BITUMINOUS (NEARING COURSE (SPWEA240C)(MINIMUM) 5" AGGREGATE BASE, CLASS 5 (100% CRUSHED ROCK) (MINIMUM) CONCRETE PEDESTRIAN RAMP 6" CONCRETE (Mn /DOT 3M41) 6" AGGREGATE BASE, CLASS 5 NOD% CRUSHED ROCK) (INCIDENTAL) 6" SELECT TOPSOIL BORROW AND SOD V) Z O 1 W K A 6w< O of w O W (n W LL O W OQ00 tz U) J W U _ LL W z 20 W 0 Z z O <LL�0 J O w LL W W O Z Q V) TYPICAL SECTIONS C.P. SHEET n -04 C2.02 NOTES, RIVIERA LANE 1. CONTRACTOR TO PROTECT EXISTING TREES, LANDSCAPING 1 AND UTILITIESAT NO ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION. l \\ 2. ALL REMOVALS WILL BE MARKED IN THE FIELD BY THE \ I I I ENGINEER. 3. ALL REACTOR AND SHALL BECOME DISPOSED OF PROPERTY UN E SS OTHERWISE i \\ CONTRACTOR AND DISPOSED OF, UNLESS OTHERWISE \\ I DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. \ 4. THIS PROJECT IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE NPDES \ GENERAL STORM M WATER R PERMIT FOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES (MM R1000001) AND SWPPP. -- 5. EXISTING UTILITIES LOCATED UNDER THE PROPOSED ROAD TO I � BE RELOCATED BY OTHERS. LEGEND: �; ( " '{� RELOCATE PEDESTAL t (BV OTHERS) — REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT \ i — I 24185 �— ( —T— _6120— _� 6100 6080 (JILL BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (2 ") I' #. _- 6� n REMOVE CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT SALVAGE GRAVEL DRIVEWAY INCIDENTAL) O SALVAGE & REINSTALL NIAILBO`( ED X SALVAGE SIGN REMOVE TREE M REMOVE STORM SEWER PIPE —gee ABANDON SANITARY SEWER PIPE — X—X—X— SALVAGE AND REINSTALL FENCE OABANDON SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE REMOVE CASTING ^O 1Ep1 RELOCATE ELECTRICAL POLE (BV OTHERS) — OSAW CUT BITUMINOUS (FULL DEPTH) . REMOVE DRAINAGE STRUCTURE 5 a )!��2 0 0 00 IT SCALE IN FEET 1 OAK I \ f t I \ � I I I I I I / I I 61]5 I 7 I fJ I I I I n I I I I I I I I /22x0 �w m v ww i-_XX_ x / xv, It_ M �I tt F R I — _ _ — � I... .. F - - - - -- .- 6115— � - - - - -- T _ 6155 '" T 6085 I \ I RELOCATE PEDESTALS (2) \ (BV OTHERS) \ \ I I I I \ I I I I I I I I I i I I I I I I I I I I I I 60 Ih _____ - -_ —_ H'. SCA E IN FEET I I 30,00 CIFY or SHOREWOOD WTI rI WSB PROJECT NO.: 02925 -240 SCALE. DESIGN BY ASS OWN DJE PLAN BY CHECK BY SHE KAK g. LL _os`-�'3 0 O: w O W (/) LL W O W z O 0 H �_ U) _J W U LL W z O W 0 Z - �xo < 2 of : �OZ5J OW LL af W LL =) O Z Q U) REMOVALS c.P. SHEET n-oa C3.01 NOTES. 1. CONTRACTOR TO PROTECT EXISTING TREES, LANDSCAPING, AND UTILITIESHT NO ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION. 2. ALL REMOVALS WILL BE MARKED IN THE FIELD BY THE ENGINEER. 3. ALL REMOVALS SHALL BECOME PROPERTY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND DISPOSED OF UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. 4. THIS PROJECT SHALL BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE NPDES GENERAL STORM WATER PERMIT FOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES (MN R1000001) AND SWPPP. 5. EXISTING UTILITIES LOCATED UNDER THE PROPOSED ROAD TO BE RELOCATED BY OTHERS. LEGEND REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT MILL BITUMINOUS P41EMENT(2) - i REMOVE CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT SALVAGE GRAVEL DRIVEWAY (INCIDENTAL) / OM SALVAGE & REINSTALL NIAILBO`( i j// 4 /�jj /jjjjj/ /jjjj / / / /j /1�� F /��( .✓/ ® SALVAGE SIGN Q 5925 REMOVE TREE X Y W 25425 D sT reM REMOVE STORM SEWER PIPE t W —gee ABANDON SANITARY SEWER PIPE SALVAGEAND REINSTALL FENCE OABANDON SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE REMOVE CASTING ^O 1Ep1 RELOCATE ELECTRICAL POLE (BV OTHERS) OSAW CUT BITUMINOUS (FULL DEPTH) . REMOVE DRAINAGE STRUCTURE )!��2 0 0 00 IT SCALE IN FEET MANN LANE Crry OF ( SHOREWOOD I I rI B A t \.... '. —., WSB PROJECT NO.: ! " 02925 -240 25110 2535D r F SCALE. DESIGN BY _ AS SHOWN DJE j S J+%O y y +00 PLAN BY CHECK BY SHE KAY Z / ��// i : FF 25405 5930 Z RELOCATE PEDESTAL O W O N (BV OTHERS) RELOCATE PEDESTAL %. (BY OTHERS) UJ � K 1 � Nz.,.... Q 0 30 60 � H® — SCALE IN FEET — - -__ LL 6oaw O of w O W (n W W 0 0 0 H H z_ U J W U LL W z 20 W 0 Z — Ofxo J O w LL af W W O Z Q U) REMOVALS c.P. SHEET 17-04 C3.02 NOTES. 1. CONTRACTOR TO PROTECT EXISTING TREES, LANDSCAPING, AND UTILITIES HT NO ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION. 2. ALL REMOVALS WILL BE MARKED IN THE FIELD BY THE ENGINEER. 3. ALL REMOVALS SHALL BECOME PROPERTY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND DISPOSED OF UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. 4. THIS PROJECT SHALL BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE NPDES GENERAL STORM WATER PERMIT FOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES (MN R1000001) AND SWPPP. 5. EXISTING UTILITIES LOCATED UNDER THE PROPOSED ROAD TO BE RELOCATED BY OTHERS. LEGEND REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT MILL BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (2 ") REMOVE CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT SALVAGE GRAVEL DRIVEWAY INCIDENTAL) OM SALVAGE & REINSTALL NIAILBO`( ® SALVAGE SIGN XREMOVE TREE sT eM REMOVE STORM SEWER PIPE —gee ABANDON SANITARY SEWER PIPE — X—X—X— SALVAGEAND REINSTALL FENCE OABANDON SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE ^O REMOVE CASTING 1Ep1 RELOCATE ELECTRICAL POLE (BY OTHERS) OB SAW CUT BITUMINOUS (FULL DEPTH) . REMOVE DRAINAGE STRUCTURE 5 SHOREWOOD LANE STAL + + 11 I ) 111_ 11 If If 1 II , 1 1 ]g0 �700 3� Z 0 30 60 STALE IN FEET CLTY OF SHOREWOOD WrI B ME PROJECT NO.: 02925 -240 SCALE. DESIGN BY ASS OWN DJE PLAN BY CHECK BY SHE KAK N 0 N W K A 0 LLj F- O w O W (n W W 0 0 0 H H z_ U) J W O LL W z 20 W 0 — Z Z O <LL�0 J O w LL af W W O Z Q U) REMOVALS c.P. I SHEET 17-04 C3.03 �l / l �l 70 «Oo STAL + + 11 I ) 111_ 11 If If 1 II , 1 1 ]g0 �700 3� Z 0 30 60 STALE IN FEET CLTY OF SHOREWOOD WrI B ME PROJECT NO.: 02925 -240 SCALE. DESIGN BY ASS OWN DJE PLAN BY CHECK BY SHE KAK N 0 N W K A 0 LLj F- O w O W (n W W 0 0 0 H H z_ U) J W O LL W z 20 W 0 — Z Z O <LL�0 J O w LL af W W O Z Q U) REMOVALS c.P. I SHEET 17-04 C3.03 NOTES. 1. ALL REMOVALS SHALL BECOME PROPERTY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND DISPOSED OF UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL KEEP DISTURBED AREAS TO THE MINIMUM REQUIRED TO COVIPLETE THE W ORK. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT EXISTING UTILITIES DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION. 4. THE EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ON THESE PLANS ARE APR OYIMATE. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO VERIFY THEIR EXACT LOCATION AND ELEVATION. (INCIDENTAL) 5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL UTILITY INVERTS AND LOCATIONS. (INCIDENTAL) 6. THE LOCATIONS OF WATER SERVICES ARE APPROXIMATE. THE ENGINEER AND THE CONTRACTOR SHALL WORK WITH THE ROMEOWNERS TO DETERMINE LOCATIONS AND MINIMIZE IMPACTS (INCIDENTAL). ]. CONTRACTOR SHALL KEEP A MINIMUM OF 1 LANE OPEN TO TRAFFIC WHILE WORKING ON YELLOWSTONE ROAD. 6. Al METER BOXES SHALL BE USED FOR ALL WATER SERVICES INSTALLED IN DRIVEWAYS. 9. INSTALL 1' TYPE K COPPER SERVICE FROM MAIN TO RIGHT -OF -WHY AS IDENTIFIED IN THE PLANS. Z 0 30 60 SCALE IN FEET 0 10 20 V SCALE IN FEET WIN STA 28 +]1.95, 22.38 LT - - - 8',W BEND - - -- _ -SI 6185 L SF RMi 6175 �gr �I WN I aN _ _ 1 I 'STA 24 +53.00, ' € "\ B16 TEE I I II � Y R\ T r -- 7 8155 6115 ,\ 6085 I II I T I I I JI. I i I I T I I I + I I II II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I __ I I I I - I I I �h�LJ- -- - - -- I I 990 985 .... ......, i i ......, i ......., i ......, i ........ ..... i ........ ... 985 980 975 975 - - - - - - - - - LONER WATER MAIN TO AVOID - - - - - - - ° 970 - - - i - - - - - - CONFLICTS WITH SANITARY - - - SEWER SERVICES (INCIDENTAL) i - - -- { - - - - - 965 965 a 960 ... -... - ' _ ....... - -- 960 v - - - - - -- - - -- 8 DIP \'JATERMAIN (POLYWRAPPED) — - - - -- - - 955 955 - .... _... ....... i ....... 18 M1IIN.VERTICAL SEPARATION ..... BETWEEN WATER MAIN AND ..... ........ ... 6 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SANITARY SEWER. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 950 950 �W CITY Or SHOREWOOD WrI B sommosom ME PROJECT NO.: 02925 -240 SCALE. DESIGN BY ASS OWN DJE PLAN BY CHECK BY IDLE KAK N Z O _ K A 6_a 00`x'3 0 W W � LL U) W w O Q 0O H H Z_ U) J W U LL w z g p w 0 Z z O 0 OZ5 J O w LL af W Lu O z U) SANITARY SEWER & WATER MAIN C.P. SHEET 17-04 C4.01 NOTES. 1. ALL REMOVALS SHALL BECOME PROPERTY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND DISPOSED OF UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL KEEP DISTURBED AREAS TO THE MINIMUM REQUIRED TO COVIPLETE THE W ORK. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT EXISTING UTILITIES DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION. 4. THE EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ON THESE PLANS ARE APR OYIMATE. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO VERIFY THEIR EXACT LOCATION AND ELEVATION. (INCIDENTAL) 5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL UTILITY INVERTS AND LOCATIONS. (INCIDENTAL) 6. THE LOCATIONS OF WATER SERVICES ARE APPROXIMATE. THE ENGINEER AND THE CONTRACTOR SHALL WORK WITH THE ROMEOWNERS TO DETERMINE LOCATIONS AND MINIMIZE IMPACTS (INCIDENTAL). 7. CONTRACTOR SHALL KEEP A MINIMUM OF 1 LANE OPEN TO TRAFFIC WHILE WORKING ON YELLOWSTONE ROAD. 6. Al METER BOXES SHALL BE USED FOR ALL WATER SERVICES INSTALLED IN DRIVEWAYS. 9. INSTALL 1' TYPE K COPPER SERVICE FROM MAIN TO RIGHT -OF -WHY AS IDENTIFIED IN THE PLANS. tt Z 0 30 60 SCALE IN FEET 0 10 20 V SCALE IN FEET RIVIERA LANE YELLOWSTONE TRAIL _____________________ 6055 6025 5TA 28 +82.95, \\ 12.13' UP \ I i I I 8 'x225` BEND \ I i I II I I I I I \ \ \ I � I I I I I I I I I 980 \ ter- 995 990 990 985 980 7.5 MIN 980 e 975 1 g °DIP WATEpMAIN (POLYWRNPPEDI _ i 975 m 970 970 965 965 960 s – - – – – – -- – - - -- -- _ - -- - - 960 F955 955 CITY Or SHOREWOOD WTI rI nommmmmmm ME PROJECT NO 02925 -240 SCALE. DESIGN BY ASS OWN DJE PLAN BY CHECK BY IDLE KAK O N K A 6_a 00`x'3 0 W � W LL U) W W Q O � Z_ U) J W U W z 20 W 0 Z z — O = O 0 ozs J O W LL af W LET Z:) O z Of Q Fn SANITARY SEWER & WATER MAIN C.P. SHEET 17-04 C4.02 NOTES. 1. ALL REMOVALS SHALL BECOME PROPERTY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND DISPOSED OF UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL KEEP DISTURBED AREAS TO THE MINIMUM REQUIRED TO COVIPLETE THE W ORK. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT EXISTING UTILITIES DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION. 4. THE EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ON THESE PLANS ARE APR OYIMATE. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO VERIFY THEIR EXACT LOCATION AND ELEVATION. (INCIDENTAL) 5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL UTILITY INVERTS AND LOCATIONS. (INCIDENTAL) 6. THE LOCATIONS OF WATER SERVICES ARE APPROXIMATE. THE ENGINEER AND THE CONTRACTOR SHALL WORK WITH THE HOMEOWNERS TO DETERMINE LOCATIONS AND MINIMIZE IMPACTS (INCIDENTAL). ]. CONTRACTOR SHALL KEEP A MINIMUM OF 1 LANE OPEN TO TRAFFIC WHILE WORKING ON YELLOWSTONE ROAD. / 6. Al METER BOXES SHALL BE USED FOR ALL WATER SERVIIKS INSTALLED IN DRIVEWAYS. 9. INSTALL 1' TYPE K COPPER SERVICE FROM MAIN TO RIGHT -OF -WHY AS IDENTIFIED IN THE PLANS. 0 30 60 SCALE IN FEET 0 10 20 V SCALE IN FEET WATER MAIINI EASEMENT `\ 995 1010 990 990 1005 985 985 980 - - 75 975 995 975 990 970 5 MIN 970 985 _ G _ 965 960 6 �Gwp1FRMNIN 965 980 - INSTALL BY ROD METHOD 955 960 975 995 1010 990 1005 985 1000 980 995 975 990 5 MIN 970 985 _ ... _ 6 �Gwp1FRMNIN 965 980 960 975 INSTALL BY ROD METHOD 955 970 P *1y A 6_a 00`x'3 0 W W C/) LL O W W OQ00 tz (5 J d Lo O W Z 2 O W o Z z — = O <LL�0 J O W LL af W W D O z Q U) SANITARY SEWER & WATER MAIN c.P. SHEET n -04 C4.03 NOTES, WATER MAIN EASEMENT 1. ALL REMOVALS SHALL BECOME PROPERTY OF THE i CONTRACTOR AND DISPOSED OF UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL KEEP DISTURBED AREAS TO THE MINIMUM // - \STA 11 +8054 ! RED REDTOCOMPLETETHEWORK. f J - -� 000 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT EXISTING UTILITIES DURING X8" TEE - ) CONSTRUCTION AT NO ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION. _ -' 8 ' 4. THE EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ON THESE PLANS ARE / - STA 11 +]8.85 APPROXIMATE. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO - STA 11 +82.28, \ 6" G.V.T VERIFY THEIR EXACT LOCATION AND ELEVATION. (INCIDENTAL) S2�o� , F _ 46 G VT 5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL UTILITY INVERTS AND LOCATIONS. (INCIDENTAL) .1��t��/ \ = STA 11 +]5 54 6. THE LOCATIONS OF \NAT ER SERVICES ARE APPROXIMATE. THE p�yf 0.00 ENGINEER AND THE CONTRACTOR SHALL WORK'NITH THE y�L'�� _ 8 "G.V. _ HOMEOWNERS TO DETERMINE LOCATIONS AND MINIMIZE IMPACTS (INCIDENTAL). ]. CONTRACTOR SHALL KEEP A MINIMUM OF 1 LANE OPEN TO TRAFFIC WHILE WORKING ON YELLOWSTONE ROAD. 6. Ai METER BOXES SHALL BE USED FOR ALL WATER SERVICES ♦ j INSTALLED IN DRIVEWAYS. 9. INSTALL 1" TYPE K COPPER SERVICE FROM MAIN TO RIGHT- OF - \NHY AS IDENTIFIED IN THE PLANS. �� " "- ♦ = ." DIRECTIONALLY DRILL ,\ x�0 8" PVC WATER MAIN 9 = c O V STA 8 +60.64. - 8 G V 0 30 60 SCALE IN FEET - e,QS 0 10 20 V.® STA 6 +5303, SCALE IN FEET 0 00 `= - 8 —P BEND 1010 1005 1005 1000 995 \` 995 990 - 7.5'kMIN 990 985 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - [- 8 "PVCWATERMAN - - - - - - - - - - - - - 985 a 980 975 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INTALL BY HDD METHOD - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 975 6 970 970 m m m m m m m or SHOREWOOD WTI rI ME PROJECT NO 02925 -240 SCALE. DESIGN BY AS SHOWN DJE PLAN BY CHECK BY IDLE KAK z Z O K A aka 00`x'3 0 w ED C/) LL U) w w O Q 0O H H Z_ IS J W U _ LL w z - O w 0 Z z — Of = O <LL�0 J O w LL af w w D O z Of Q U) SANITARY SEWER & WATER MAIN C.P. SHEET 17-04 C4.04 NOTES. ,IV1806 1. ALL REMOVALS SHALL BECOME PROPERTY OF THE A— CONTRACTOR AND DISPOSED OF UNLESS OTHERWISE 12 PLUG DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. 9 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL KEEP DISTURBED AREAS TO THE MINIMUM - - - - - - - - - RED REDTOCOVIPLETETHEWORK. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT EXISTING UTILITIES DURING J CONSTRUCTION AT NO ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION. LLB 4. THE EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ON THESE PLANS ARE �l APPROXIMATE. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO Q VERIFY THEIR EXACT LOCATION AND ELEVATION .(INCIDENTAL) 5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL UTILITY INVERTS AND ,Q J J O LOCATIONS. (INCIDENTAL) 6. THE LOCATIONS OF WATER SERVICES ARE APPROXIMATE. THI� J J ENGINEER AND THE CONTRACTOR SHALL WOR K WITH THE ROMEOWNERS TO DETERMINE LOCATIONS AND MINIMIZE FEET IMPACTS (INCIDENTAL), y ]. CONTRACTOR SHALL KEEP A MINIMUM OF 1 LANE OPEN TO 1 TRAFFIC WHILE WORKING ON YELLOWSTONE ROAD. 1( i 6. Al METER BOXES SHALL BE USED FOR ALL WATER SERVICES ! 4 INSTALLED IN DRIVEWAYS. 9. INSTALL 1' TYPE K COPPER SERVICE FR01,1 I,1AIN TO CONNECT TO EXISTING RIGHT-OF-AY AS IDENTIFIED IN THE PLANS. 7 I t WATER MAIN + STA 0 +41.38 — 33.00'LT 12 G.V. 'V ,IV1806 LT A— r 12 PLUG REPLACE BITUMINOUS STREET SECTION TO MATCH EXISTING 9 STA 0 39 32 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -12" PVCWATERMAIN- - - - - - - - 75 AIN- - 6] LT 0 30 60J 12X12 TEE] SCALE IN FEEyJ J 0 10 20 975 970 SCALE FEET YELLOWSTONE TRAIL J J J � J J �V �OQ JJ J J STA 5 +48.88, 1 O LT V I 12" G.V. 30.00' LT=� DIRECTIONALLY DRILL -- 12 PVC WATER MAIN _ _ - --- 10.00 LT. S 2 +00 STA 0 +48.95 1].48 LT —� I —I I 5 +00 12 G.V. A— r f REPLACE BITUMINOUS STREET SECTION TO MATCH EXISTING 9 CONDITIONS - - - - - - - - - - - - - -12" PVCWATERMAIN- - - - - - - - 75 AIN- - O 3.8�— _ W 1' w —t K REPLACE BITUMINOUS STREET SECTION TO MATCH EXISTING CONDITIONS I J J STA 5 +82.83, 2.85' LT HYDRANT DIP — ee CITY OF SHOREWOOD WTI rI Ammmmmm ME PROJECT NO 02925 -240 SCALE. DESIGN BY AS SHOWN DJE PLAN BY CHECK BY IDLE KAK 990 0 A— r rITA 9 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -12" PVCWATERMAIN- - - - - - - - 75 AIN- - O 3.8�— _ W 10 00' LT STA 5 +82.83 —t K 12'X8 "TEE 100WLT 12'X.8"TEE j� 1 975 990 gas `\ -- - -, 9 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -12" PVCWATERMAIN- - - - - - - - 75 AIN- - 980 va 980 975 ( 975 970 970 965 965 a 960 955 6 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - .INSTALL BY HDD METHOD - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 955 A 6w< 00`x'3 0 0 LLj F- 0 z O Lo 0� LIE Fn w O w OQ> jtz J � U LL <2 - LL Qf � OZ5 J O w LL of W LL D O z af Q SANITARY SEWER & WATER MAIN C.P. SHEET n -04 C4.05 NOTES, YELLOWSTONE TRAIL 1. ALL REMOVALS SHALL BECOME PROPERTY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND DISPOSED OF UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL KEEP DISTURBED AREAS TO THE MINIMUM REQUIRED TO COVIPLETE THE W ORK. I 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT EXISTING UTILITIES DURING oo I 24100 CONSTRUCTION AT NO ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION. 4. THE EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ON THESE PLANS ARE -- APPROXIMATE. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO -- VERIFV THEIR EXACT LOCATION AND ELEVATION. (INCIDENTAL) 'ST4 11 +62.03, STA iq +80.33. 5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL UTILITY INVERTS AND 10.03' LT LOCATIONS. ( INCIDENTAL) 12" G.V. I 9.10' PT 6. THE LOCATIONS OF WATER SERVICES ARE APPROXIMATE. THE STA 29 +23.]0 11" PLUG ENGINEER AND THE CONTRACTOR SHALL WORK WITH THE i 2931 RT STA 11 +6].20, HOMEOWNERS TO DETERMINE LOCATIONS MINIMIZE \ 24140 STA iq +22.63, 12 -TEE i G PACTS (INCIDENTAL), t 20.22 LT ! _ ]. CONTRACTOR SHALL KEEP A MINIMUM OF 1 LANE OPEN TO } 10 MIN HYDRANT I � 121 %81TF. TRAFFIC WHILE WORKING ON YELLOWSTONE ROAD. ii ! SEPARATION REPLACE BITUMINOUS STREET _ c 6. Ai METER BOXES SHALL BE USED FOR ALL WATER SERVICES 6 GV SECTION TO MATCH EXISTING_ INSTALLED IN DRIVEWAYS, i _ CONDITIONS 9. INSTALL 1' 242]0 DIRECTIONALLY D TYPE K COPPER SERVICE FROM MAIN TO 4 � RILL _ RIGHT -OF- \WHY AS IDENTIFIED IN THE PLANS. 1 tttt 12 PVC WATER MAIN 1 _ t �I �I 111 +00 100 I- - - -_1� ll �� ... R43� 2 j STA 29 +13.00, ! 13+00 ) 34.18 RT �\ 10 00 HV 99.. H s GRANT 11,1 DIP � , STP 11 6].03 -- `- -�. 1003'LT 4 V. 12'X6' EE STA I4 o6.9s I - T STA 10.04'UP 1.56, i 8 r 12 'x45° BEND t 6025 0 30 60 IT RIVIERA LANE SEE SHEET C4.02 O I� SCALE IN FEET V'. 0® 10 20 w 1 f t SCALE IN FEET ( tt cLry or SHOREWOOD WTI rI Ammmmmm ME PROJECT NO 02925 -240 SCALE. DESIGN BY AS SHOWN DJE PLAN BY CHECK BY IDLE KAK N Z O A 6_a O w O W LL C/) W W O Q 0 H z_ U) J W O LL W z 20 W 0 Z o <LL�0 J O w LL W W O Z Q U) SANITARY SEWER & WATER MAIN C.P. SHEET n -04 C4.06 NOTES. 1. ALL REMOVALS SHALL BECOME PROPERTY OF THE 985 CONTRACTOR AND DISPOSED OF UNLESS OTHERWISE i ......, i ......., i ......, i ........ ..... i ........ DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. 985 - - - -- - - -- 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL KEEP DISTURBED AREAS TO THE MINIMUM soo17 - - - -- - - - - -- REQUIRED TO COVIPLETE THE W ORK. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT EXISTING UTILITIES DURING f CONSTRUCTION AT NO ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION. ly 980 tf 4. THE EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ON THESE PLANS ARE ... ST L23.8 63 L APPROXIMATE. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO V ERIFY THEIR EXACT LOCATION AND ELEVATION (INCIDENTAL) f 5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL UTILITY INVERTS AND -STA: 62 +63.44 R: 9]0.69 LOCATIONS (INCIDENTAL) - - 6. THE LOCATIONS OF CA ER SERVICES ARE APPROXIMATE THE - - - - -LOC. 3]86 LT ENGINEER AND THE CONTRACTOR SHALL WORK WITH THE ROMEOWNERS TO DETERMINE LOCATIONS AND MINIMIZE (n - - IMPACTS (INCIDENTAL). 7. CONTRACTOR SHALL KEEP A MINIMUM OF 1 LANE OPEN TO 60f00 - - 61- — TRAFFIC WHILE WORKING ON YELLOWSTONE ROAD. 6. Al METER BOXES SHALL BE USED FOR ALL WATER SERVICES t 6000 INSTALLED IN DRIVEWAYS. 975 9. INSTALL 1" TYPE K COPPER SERVICE FROM MAIN TO 1 O RIGHT -OF -WHY AS IDENTIFIED IN THE PLANS. f1 ) 975 STA. 64 +9] 30 _ . _ _...... - - - -- — - - - -- - - -- - -- - LOC 616 RT - -- R96434 - - - -- - - - - - -- f INV 95418 (SW) Z i 970 SCALE IN FEET t1 - 0 10 20 -- V emsREEENiiiI SCALE IN FEET s - ........ SHOREWOOD LANE CONNECT TO EXISTING SANITARY MANHOLE FIRE DEPT. AND COREDRILL 24100 62,00 _ 6ry CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY IF SANITARY SERVICE IS ACTIVE (INCIDENTAL) S ABANDON SANITARY MANHOLE CONNECT TO EXISTING SANITARY SERVICE ABANDON SANITARY° - �� MANHOLE s. 660p 5625 ,6D00 ' ! CONNECT TO EXISTING SANITARY SERVICE 990 985 .... ......, i i ......, i ......., i ......, i ........ ..... i ........ ... 985 - - - -- - - -- - - - -- - - - - -- soo17 - - - -- - - - - -- 980 ,... ,... .., ,..... TYPE 48' 0 ... ST L23.8 63 L -STA: 62 +63.44 R: 9]0.69 - - - - - - -LOC. 3]86 LT I 957.93 (SW) - - - - - - R 9]1.22- - INV 957.83 (NE) 6000 975 - -INV: 964.02 (NE)- - - - TYPE 48 O ) 975 STA. 64 +9] 30 _ . _ _...... - - - -- — - - - -- - - -- - -- - LOC 616 RT - -- R96434 - - - -- - - - - - -- INV 95418 (SW) - 970 N 970 m 965 - -- 965 - ........ .. 960 - 960 v - - - - - - - - - - - 78' -8" PVC SANITARY SEWER @ 7 .83Yo -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 955 6 1]4' -8 "PVC SANITARY SEWER @1.75% 950 950 crry or SHOREWOOD WrI B Ammmmmm ME PROJECT NO 02925 -240 SCALE. DESIGN BY ASS OWN DJE PLAN BY CHECK BY IDLE KAK N Z O K A 6_a 00`x'3 0 r LL, LL U) ED C/) w O w O Q O � �_ U) J W U _ LL w z - O w 0 Z z — Of = O 0 OZ5 J O w LL af w w O z Q 05 SANITARY SEWER & WATER MAIN C.P. SHEET 17-04 C4.07 NOTES. 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL KEEP DISTURBED AREAS TO THE MINIMUM REQUIRED TO COAT PLETE THE WORK. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT EXISTING UTILITIES DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION. 3. THE EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ON THESE PLANS ARE APPROXIMATE. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO VERIFY THEIR EXACT LOCATION AND ELEVATION. I I I I T F 4 RIPRAP CLASS III AND GEOTEXTILE FABRIC (BEE SPEC) DIRTL STORECM SE \NIONAER LY -_ DRILL! 5102 i / J J 48'0 - - - - - - - / / fi13o 0 30 60 SCALE IN FEET 0 10 20 V SCALE IN FEET Y , RIVIERA LANE m� m$ m& 'g 20 +00 20 +50 21 +00 21 +50 22 +00 22 +50 23 +00 23 +50 24 +00 24 +50 O CITY OF SHOREWOOD WS WSB PROJECT NO 02925 -240 SCALE: DESIGN BV: AS BHO.N LEE PLAN BY CHECK BY: DJE KAK N O ED Q ow" 3 Q w (� � LL W NO w O ol z O Z H } Z Q 0,i ~ u=iJ�Es z z , = O Q Q } a F-- O o6 O W LL w w D O Z Q U) STORM SEWER C.P. I SHEET 17 -04 C5.01 48'0 - - - - - - - TYPE:48 "O - - - - - - - - -- - - - - -- -- -- - - - -- - - - - - - - -- -- -;STH: 22 +5154 - - - -- - -- - ST4: 23 +23.52 - - - -- - -- 990 - 5106 - - - :LOO 22.54 RT - - - - - - - - - 5111 - LOO. 14.@'RT 990 TYPE 2X3 OF STA. 22 +50.01 - R 7.62 RE 2 .INV: 964.55(W) - STH: 23 +23.52 R 967.64 INV: 964.42 (YV) - - - - - - - - - TYPE 213 CB - - - - LOC: 14.00'LT - - - :INV: 964.55 (E) - LOO. IJ.00 INV: 964 :421E) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - STA 20 +89 54 - - - R: 96].98 - - - SUMP 963.62 - - R'. 96].64 - - - - - INV: 964.42(N) - - - - - - - - 985 - - - LOG: 2965 RT I - - - INV: 964.87(E) - (FILL A /CONCRETE) - - - INV. 9fi4 ]0 (E) - - SUMP 963.48 - - - 985 \ \ I R 9fi]36 SUMP 963.94 - I SUI,iP. 96348 - (FILL Wl CONCRETE) ...... .. - - INV S64.70 (NW) C510-2) � (FILLWI CONCRETE) FES 5108 (FILL NI CONCRETE) FE85109 - - SUAIP 96336 TYPE 48 8 - - - 5105 TYPE 12 APRON TYPE 15-APROM 980 STA 20+94.59 STA. 23-23.73 1 112.37 0 IN 62.62 16" 12 -12 RCPo - - - - - CLIII @ 036P - - LOCE14Ap RT CLIII@ -050/ 14' -15 ' RCP STHE24 +2].018 - 9%5 O 5101 _ R: 96]98 - - 2b' -15 RCP 9' -15 "EGG CLIII @126% - LOG'14.00'RT - 975 - - ._ _. I _ ttPE J8 0 -STA. - TYPE. 60 0 _ _ o INV 9fi4.]] (\V) CL III - - - - - CLIII@ 1 50% - INV: 964.42(E)- - - - - - _ _ 'R'. 968.89 INV: 96524 (S) - - - - - - - - - - - i / 32' -15" RCP 20 +]3.12 - - - - - ST4: 21 +25.71 - - - - - - - - INV 964.17 (S) - - - SUL P 964.44 - - - - ' CLIII @050% - LOC: 80.96]" LOC. IJ 00 RT - SUMP 96394 (FILL N964.44 CONCRETE) 970 - FES 5100 - - INV 962.09 (N) = R'. 96751 - (FILLYVI CONCRETE) - 970 a - = - ttPE 21 APRON ' - ^- - BTA 20 +50.02 - - - LOG 22]89 LT _ - - - - 5101 - - - - - - - - - - INV �� - _ -INV: - - - 963.36(N) INV: 964S4(SE) INV_003.36 (SW) -: - 5110 _- INV 960.80 (NE) r L a 965 965 4 ....... .., 0 ....... z 1S "RCP - 4 960 _,' -- - - - - - - - - - -_- - - - - CLIII @1.56% - - - - 12J 18 RCP ------ _---- - - - - - -- 4 - -_- - - - - - - - 960 _ 188 -21'F-PVC _ _ _ 'CLIII @0.65/ -"�W -` - I "" -- - - = - I 6900 @0.68% - 31 21 RCP - _ CL III @ 0.89% 955 c 9 54NITARY € \9ER - 955 I I- INSTALL BY HOD METHOD m� m$ m& 'g 20 +00 20 +50 21 +00 21 +50 22 +00 22 +50 23 +00 23 +50 24 +00 24 +50 O CITY OF SHOREWOOD WS WSB PROJECT NO 02925 -240 SCALE: DESIGN BV: AS BHO.N LEE PLAN BY CHECK BY: DJE KAK N O ED Q ow" 3 Q w (� � LL W NO w O ol z O Z H } Z Q 0,i ~ u=iJ�Es z z , = O Q Q } a F-- O o6 O W LL w w D O Z Q U) STORM SEWER C.P. I SHEET 17 -04 C5.01 NOTES MANN LANE 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL KEEP DISTURBED AREAS TO THE MINIMUM - - -- - -- - - - -- - - -- -- REQUIRED TO COMPLETE THE WORK. -------- - 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT EXISTING UTILITIES DURING - - - - - -- - -- - - - - - -- CONSTRUCTION AT NO ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION. 3. THE EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ON THESE PLANS ARE i ...... i APPROXIMATE. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO VERIFY THEIR EXACT LOCATION AND ELEVATION. - - - - - - - - - Q -. TYPE. 2'x3'CB - - - - - - - - - - - - - 0 eas 25410 _... ( _ _ _ — — 5202 — — ...... LOG 13.00' LT - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - i TYPE DESIGN G - - - - _ _ _R. 98201 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - STA. 6 +35.56 - 25425 25405 N I 995 0 30 60 LOC. 1688 RT N IT SCALE IN FEET 0 10 20 1 _ _ SCALE IN FEET 5930 I j 1 � 0 Z, Q U) - - - - - SUMR 9'!]85 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - (FRL YOI CONCRET = - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 990 ---- - - -- - - -- 20 15 RCP- - - -- - - - -- - -- - - -- -- 985 -- - - - - -- _ -- - - - - -- - - - - - -- CLV x0.55% - - -- - - - - - -- - - - - - -- - - - -- -- - - - - -- _... 10' -15 "RCP —, - - -- CLV @0.55% T, 980 975 - - -- — -- -- ° -- — 970 - - — — _ _ — 965 m m$ m$ m m m m m 1 990 CIFY or SHOREWOOD WSY WSB PROJECT NO.: 02925 -240 SCALE. DESIGN BY ASS OWN DJE PLAN BY CHECK BY DJE RAN z z 0 A 6_a 00`x'3 0 w LI.( C/) � 0 w 0� LIE w 000HHZ_ U) J W U LL z 20 w 0 Z z z 0 0 OZ5 J 0 w LL af w w Z:) 0 Z Q U) STORM SEWER c.P. SHEET 17-04 C5.02 - - - -- - - - -- - -- -- - - - -- -- - - -- - - - - -- TYPE: 2Y.3�CB- - -- - - - -- - -- - - - -- - - -- -- -------- - - - - - -- -- - - - - -- - - -- - - - - - -- STA 6 +35.56 - - -- - - - - - - -- - -- - - - - - -- 005 L LOG 13.00' RT i i i i i i R 982.01 i i ...... i - - - - - - - - INV 979.99 IS) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SUMP: 978.01 - - - - T TYPE. 2'x3'CB - - - - - - - - - - - - - OOO - (FILL WA CONCRETE) S O _... ( _ _ _ — — 5202 — — ...... LOG 13.00' LT - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - i TYPE DESIGN G - - - - _ _ _R. 98201 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - STA. 6 +35.56 - - - - - - I - 995 LOC. 1688 RT N 1 _ _ 1 990 CIFY or SHOREWOOD WSY WSB PROJECT NO.: 02925 -240 SCALE. DESIGN BY ASS OWN DJE PLAN BY CHECK BY DJE RAN z z 0 A 6_a 00`x'3 0 w LI.( C/) � 0 w 0� LIE w 000HHZ_ U) J W U LL z 20 w 0 Z z z 0 0 OZ5 J 0 w LL af w w Z:) 0 Z Q U) STORM SEWER c.P. SHEET 17-04 C5.02 NOTES 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL KEEP DISTURBED AREAS TO THE MINIMUM A CURED TO COMPLETE THE WORK. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT EXISTING UTILITIES DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION. 3. THE EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ON THESE PLANS ARE APPROXIMATE. ITIS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO `6y. VERIFY THEIR EXACT LOCATION AND ELEVATION. SHOREWOOD LANE ` 5625 L 0 0 60 IT SCALE IN FEET 0 10 20 V SCALE IN FEET --------------- T ----------------- , - - - -- 5575 1 5555 7 7 5535 —T 1 11 Ift it 111 . � I 11 1 crry or SHOREWOD WSY OD WSB PROJECT NO.: 02925 -240 SCALE. DESIGN BY AS SHOWN DJE PLAN BY CHECK BY DJE RAN LD A 6_a C) LJLJ 0L 0 Lu W ( W LL n O W 0 0 H zz u 0 � LL W O LL � z 0 w o z z — x 0 <LL�0 J O w LL af w w D 0 Z Q 0 E7 —i STORM SEWER c.P. SHEET 17-04 C5.03 r 5580 — — — ° _ 1 r -- -- _'___ 5003 5520 10 67+00 1 —00 69 +00 70,00 --------------- T ----------------- , - - - -- 5575 1 5555 7 7 5535 —T 1 11 Ift it 111 . � I 11 1 crry or SHOREWOD WSY OD WSB PROJECT NO.: 02925 -240 SCALE. DESIGN BY AS SHOWN DJE PLAN BY CHECK BY DJE RAN LD A 6_a C) LJLJ 0L 0 Lu W ( W LL n O W 0 0 H zz u 0 � LL W O LL � z 0 w o z z — x 0 <LL�0 J O w LL af w w D 0 Z Q 0 E7 —i STORM SEWER c.P. SHEET 17-04 C5.03 NOTES, RIVIERA LANE 1. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO BACK OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. l\ 2. SEE SHEET C .01 TO C2.02 FOR TYPICAL SECTION DETAILS. l 3. SEE SHEET C9.01 TO C9.04 FOR EROSION CONTROL DETAILS \ POST CONSTRUCTION. \ 4. CONTRACTOR TO PROTECT EXISTING TREES A N D LANDSCAPING \\ (INCIDENTAL).` LEGEND_ j I BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT \ I ) I - _ \ 24185 5' BITUMINOUS APRON ON I I B12o- ALL GRAVEL DRIVEW 4VS 6100 i 8080 �- O CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT -- - - _ _ } } GRAVEL DRIVEWAY -5, — . .... , ( 2900 L_ 25 +00 n —28 BACK TO BACK u' R25' - -- - - - -- - - - - -- \ � — — 6155 811 t i \ T--------- - - - - -- - - -� I DRAINAGE AND � 6185 \ - + UTILITY EASEMENT \\ 845.5 I I I \ I I I I I \ I I 0 30 60 I I II I I I I I � / � � SCALE IN FEET � - - - � I I I I I I I 0 10 20 i 6176 I V. SCALE IN FEET _ —____— I f _ 990 PAIS 24L25.00 PVIE 96].]4 -- - - - - -- - - - -- - -- - - - - -- - - - - - - - - -- - - - AD 533 - - - - -- - -- - - - - -- -------- - - -- -- - - - - -- - - - - - - -- - K:42.90 - - - - -- -- - - - - -- 985 P \/1520 +]5.00 250.00'VC 9 _... - -- - - - -- _ <-- PJ1E.957.72 - _ - - -- -- - AD 3.20 - -- - _ _... . - -- - - - -- - - -- ma - - -- - - -- -LP STA:23 +23.54 -: - - -- ---- o!r"'i, -- - - -- - ...... - - - - - - - - - - - - - K:28.15 - - PVIS:2$ *00.00 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LP ELEV:968.36 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 980 - - - - - - - - - - - - - 90.00, VC - - - PVIE:468:97 - - - - - - - - - - - AD :T 55 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 980 LP STA:20 +91.85 g w - - 1 LP ELEV 968.03 m 81 33'VC HP 975 HP ELE` / ELE' 9 68309 , c m - - - - - EXNIH - 970 - i i i RIM 9fi8.81 — 970 ..... ... :�� 220%, ....... i a 055% ...,.... - - - -..- ..... ..... { .... 965 965 960 _ - _- -- - ---- °--- Y- - - - - _3 - -- - -- t� - - 960 G — 2 -------- -------------- 955 955 6 PROPOSED 4 ELEVATION S - - - - - - - - - - - - - EXISTING 4 ELEVATION - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 950 950 roW CIFY or SHOREWOOD WS_I WSB PR® 02925 -240 SCALE: DESIGN BY AS SHOWN DOE PLAN BY CHECK BY DJE DAD N Z O K A 6_a 00`x'3 0 Oofz p W 0� LIE � w O w LL cf) Q O ~ J d � U w z 2 O w 0 zz —�=� 0 OZ5 J Ow LL af w w D O Z of -i STREET CONSTRUCTION c.P. SHEET 17-04 C6.01 NOTES'. 1. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO BACK OF CURB UNLESS OTHEROISE NOTED. 2. SEE SHEET C .01 TO C2.02 FOR TYPICAL SECTION DETAILS. 3. SEE SHEET C9.01 TO C9.04 FOR EROSION CONTROL DETAILS POST CONSTRUCTION. 4. COULD 4CTOR TO PROTECT EXISTING TREES AND LANDSCAPING (INCIDENTAL). LEGEND: - -- -- -- - - - - -- BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT - -- PVIS:27i0000 - - -- BITUMINOUS DRIVE-AY PAVEMENT -- - CONCRETE DRIVEIV41 PAVEMENT } } GRAVEL DRIIE-V l g rn Wi i - 6085 I I I Z I I I 0 30 60 I I I I SCALE IN FEET i I 0 10 20 V emsREEENiiiI I I SCALE IN FEET I I � I I I z O K A 6_a 0.I 0 W W � LL U) W W O Q 0O H H Z_ � J W U _ LL W z 20 W 0 Z z � � = O 0 OZ5 J O W LL af W W U Z of -i STREET CONSTRUCTION c.P. SHEET 17-04 C6.02 - -- -- -- - - - - -- - - -- - -- PVIS:27i0000 - - -- - - -- - -- - - - -- -- - - - - - - - - - - PVIS.24 +2500 - - - - - - - - - - - - PVIE:98225 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 995 - -- - - -- - - -- -- - - -- PVIE'.967.74 - - - -- AD:5.83 - -- - - -- 4D'.3.41 - - - -- K:8].95 - -- - - - -- - -- - - - - -- - 995 _ _ _ K;42.90 1 1 300.00 VG - - - - - - - - - - 250.00'VC - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 990 n o m 990 985 w 980 980 -- EY.M 73 - - - - RIM. 972.59 - 975 = 975 970 _ 970 965 965 960 -- _ - - -- - - -- - - - -- - -- - - - -_ - -- - -- -- - - - -- 960 6 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PROPOSED 4 ELEVATION - - - - - - S - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EXISTING E ELEVATION - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 955 955 z O K A 6_a 0.I 0 W W � LL U) W W O Q 0O H H Z_ � J W U _ LL W z 20 W 0 Z z � � = O 0 OZ5 J O W LL af W W U Z of -i STREET CONSTRUCTION c.P. SHEET 17-04 C6.02 NOTES. 1. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO BACK OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 2. SEE SHEET C .01 TO C2.02 FOR TYPICAL SECTION DETAILS. 3. SEE SHEET C9.01 TO C9.04 FOR EROSION CONTROL DETAILS POST CONSTRUCTION. 4. COULD 4CTOR TO PROTECT EXISTING TREES AND LANDSCAPING (INCIDENTAL). LEGEND: BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT BITUMINOUS DRIVEIVAV PAVEMENT MATCH EXISTING P BITUMINOUS APRON ON PAVEMENT ALL GRAVEL DRIVEAAYS CONCRETE DRIVEIV41 PAVEMENT O) 5885 } } GRAVEL DRIVE-AV N 0 30 60 SCALE IN FEET 0 10 20 V SCALE IN FEET — 5925 i 25425 MANN LANE 25410 ST4 5 +89.89, 3.89' LT S4NITANY SPOT REPAIR i (SHORT LINER SEE SPEC) 26 BACK TO BACK 25405 R20 J. 5930 I j MATCH EXISTING PAVEMENT 1 z',I Q LLI U) 005 Crry or _f SHOREWOOD t WSrI WSB PROJECT NO.: 25350 -` ` MATCH EXISTING 02925 -240 SCALE. DESIGN BY ' - PAVEMENT AS SHOWN DOE BY CHECK BY DUE DAN R20 J. 5930 I j MATCH EXISTING PAVEMENT 1 z',I Q LLI U) 005 000 "PVIs 2 +50.00 — — ° — ° •— —` -- - - - - -- - - - PVIE:985.D6 - -- ID 1.82 -- - - - - -- - - - - - - -- -- - - - - -- - -- - - - - -- 995 - _ K .c O7 - 1 K55. Vc - - PVIE 982.135 AD'.2. 24 %AIH2 _ - - - - - - - K- 122,51 - RIM 984.44, - - o m 273.90 VC _ - - 990 o w > M w LP STA:6 +96 86 w w LP ELEV:982.T0 $ _ - - - -- -- - - -- E—. - - -- - - -- - - - - - - - - - - -- 2.50 °0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - i RIM 99339 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 985 _ 068% 980 975 — —:— - - -- - - -- — -- - -- - - - - -- ° -- - - -- PROPOSED 4 ELEVATION - - - EXISTING 4 ELEVATION - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 965 F �7, m$ m$ m 1+00 1 +50 2 +00 2 +50 3 +00 3 +50 4+00 4 +50 5 +00 5 +50 6 +00 6+50 7 +00 7 +50 8 +00 B +50 990 N O A, A 00`x'3 0 w LL, . O w w 0Z>0 >,j�: J W U <2� : ozs J O w LL af w w D O Z of -i STREET CONSTRUCTION C.P. SHEET 17-04 C6.03 NOTES, SHOREWOOD LANE 1. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO BACK OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 985 .... ......, i i ......, i ......., 2. SEE SHEET C .01 TO C2.02 FOR TYPICAL SECTION DETAILS. ......, i ........ ..... i ........ 3. SEE SHEET C9.01 TO C9.04 FOR EROSION CONTROL DETAILS 985 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - POST CONSTRUCTION. - - - PVIS:61 +93.00 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 4. CONTRACTOR TO PROTECT EXISTING TREES A N D LANDSCAPING t CONSTRUCT CONCRETE PEDESTRIAN - -- - - - -- - (INCIDENTAL). y - -- EVE :970.19 -- - _y CURB RALIP ACCORDING TO STANDARD FIRE DEPT - - - f - - - -- -- 't PLATES ON SHEETS C0.03 TO C0.08. 24100 LEGEND: - - -- - -- - - - -- - _ ' - -- BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT PVIS:63 +36.32 - - - - - -- - - - - - -- -- a r BITUMINOUS DRIVEIVAV PAVEMENT CONCRETE DRIVEIVAV PAVEMENT 60t00 it 51 +00 " 62 +.z –; W16 6519-0 980 7 } } GRAVEL DRIVEWAY 'y - '- \\\ / 1y '� 28 BACK TO BACK f PVIE 964.50 _ T _ - - - - - LP ST4:62 +21 59 O — �x HD 3 39 - - - i LP ELEV:9]0.49. - - n - ° t' - - - - - K 29.49 - - - , - - - - - - - 975 - a O1� w: { m HP STH 62 +9315 -mw loo.oRVC 5625 \��? u v, – ® SCALE IN FEET HP ELEV 979.68 _m I� 0 10 20 7777-2 78 °0 V SCALE IN FEET`. 7 –� 990 985 .... ......, i i ......, i ......., i ......, i ........ ..... i ........ ... 985 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVIS:61 +93.00 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - -- - - - -- - - -- - - - -- - - - - -- EVE :970.19 -- - - -- - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - -- -- --- - - - -- - - -- - -- - - - -- - - -- AD.3.54 -- - - -- PVIS:63 +36.32 - - - - - -- - - - - - -- -- 980 _ –; W16 6519-0 980 K 25.51 PVIE 964.50 - - - - - LP ST4:62 +21 59 125.00 VC _ HD 3 39 - - - i LP ELEV:9]0.49. - - n - ° - - - - - K 29.49 - - - , - - - - - - - 975 - a O1� w: N ww m HP STH 62 +9315 -mw loo.oRVC v, .q ° F HP ELEV 979.68 _m 7777-2 78 °0 970 970 965 - -- _ 965 - ........ .. 960 ° 960 955 6 PROPOSED E ELEVATION S - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EXISTING 4 ELEVATION - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 950 950 '4 c{ry or SHOREWOOD WTI rI WSB PROJECT NO 02925 -240 SCALE. DESIGN BY ASSHOWN DOE PLAN BY CHECK BY DUE DAD N Z O K A 6_a 'V 00`x'3 0 F w LL U) uQ U ~ J W U _ ELj LL z- O w 0 Z z z — Of = O 0 OZ5 J O w LL af w w O Z of Q STREET CONSTRUCTION C.P. SHEET 17-04 C6.04 NOTES, S SHOREWOOD LANE 1. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO BACK OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 2. SEE SHEET C .01 TO C2.02 FOR TYPICAL SECTION DETAILS. 3. SEE SHEET C9.01 TO C9.04 FOR EROSION CONTROL DETAILS POST CONSTRUCTION. 4. COULD 4CTOR TO PROTECT EXISTING TREES AND LANDSCAPING (INCIDENTAL). �l LEGEND: BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT BITUMINOUS DRIVE -Al PAVEMENT 5 5560 l 5 BITUMINOUS APRON ON / /l l CONCRETE DRIVEIV41 PAVEMENT R R211' A ALL GRAVEL DRIVEWAYS 5500 l l } } GRAVEL DRIVELVAY z z $ l R25' 2 28 BACK TO BACK— ---7- O w 5 R455 5 5 O w� ~� - 6 60°00 6 61 +00 / � � 1 1 -------- - I l i -_ - - -- - - - - -- l Z / / U URA T TY E 5535 1 1 5 5515 0 30 60 7 7 7 7 1 111 ° - -` 1 A ADJUST FRAME AND SCALE IN FEET f f 1 _ ' 1 R RING CASTING 0 10 20 I A 1 V It 1 11 A SCALE IN FEET 7 1 1 I I 985 980 - - - - - - - - - - - - P PVIS 65 +00.00 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - -- - - -- P PAP 964.50 -- - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - -- - -- - - - - - -- - -- - - - - -- 975 A AD339 K2949 PVIS 66 +99.56 - - - 1 10000 VC - - P PVIE 963.00 - - - - - R RIM. 96130 - - - - - - - - - 9 970 K n i i i i K .35' V i i i i i i i i i i uj VC 965 - - - - 9 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 960 — 1 _ . .. 1 _ _ _ _ . __ — — - - - , 970 crry or SHOREWOOD WTI rI Ammmmmm ME PROJECT NO 02925 -240 SCALE. DESIGN BY AS SHOWN DOE PLAN BY CHECK BY DUE DAD N Z O N K A 6ia 00`x'3 0 0 Uj F- w w cn 0 LL w 0� LIE w 0 Q 0 � � IS J W U LL z 20 w 0 Z z — x 0 <2 �: OZ5 J 0 w LL af w w 0 Z Q U) STREET CONSTRUCTION C.P. SHEET 17-04 C6.05 RIVIERA LANE I I I I II I I I I TC= 968.51 GL- 960.10 I L______________ - r - -. -.- TC= 968.36 ________ __________ ___ --- '--- -_____ GL-968.93 '- - - -_ -_ m\ 966x6 \e ----------------- TC-968.83 \ GL B0.69 _ \ TC- 969.29 1 I 6175 i CLTV Or SHOREWOOD WSY W3B PROJECT NO.: 02925 -240 SCALE. DESIGN BY AS SHOWN DJE PLAN BY CHECK BY DJE CAN LL O�z p il W (n w LLO W U Q O 0H H zz U d lw U W z 0 O z <LL�0 J O W LL af W W Q Z Q U) CUL -DE -SAC DETAILS c.P. I SHEET n -o4 C7.01 TC= 969.32 0 GL-968.99 f -- - - - - - - - - - - - I I I 6185 1 I 6175 i CLTV Or SHOREWOOD WSY W3B PROJECT NO.: 02925 -240 SCALE. DESIGN BY AS SHOWN DJE PLAN BY CHECK BY DJE CAN LL O�z p il W (n w LLO W U Q O 0H H zz U d lw U W z 0 O z <LL�0 J O W LL af W W Q Z Q U) CUL -DE -SAC DETAILS c.P. I SHEET n -o4 C7.01 5560 1 GL= 962.21 f I TC -962 62 I GL 96229 HE SHOREWOOD LANE 5520 ' I Tc 96z 14 I ryae Wv TC= 981.IS J GL= 961.42 TC 962.16 GL= 961.82 I Edo 2� I CL-962.04 I \ 2. 7 I I Crry OF SHOREWOOD WSY WSB PROJECT NO.: 02925 -240 SCALE. DESIGN BY AS SHOWN DJE PLAN BY CHECK BY DJE CAN T_961.74 5515 - GL- 961.41 N Z O c N uJ K _ __________________________ w —4; - TC-961.43 .. - ______-____ _________ _ GL= 961. - ___-___ _ LE 5. - rcE rc _ o t mµ- � f 1 _00 °3 0 i C) W Q O z ~O % w � � LLO w >O L- 961.93 1 G961.0 5535 O Q V ~ U) J 0 w z zW -O s�W O J y 2 of J 0111 LL af W W 0 Z = j Q 6) J N CUL -DE -SAC 0 0 20 iiiio SCALE IN FEET DETAILS C.P. I SHEET 17 -04 C7.02 9]5 9]0 965 960 LM RIVIERA LANE EEO] u DRIVEN AY - - - -- -- 6155 - RIVIERA LANE - - -- - - -- A 975 975 - - -- - - -- - - - -- - - -- - -- 975 985 - - - -- - - -- - -- - - -- .....970 970 965 9651965 4 60 960 i A _. I � ........970 980.. 975 60 97 0 A 985 980 q q9]5 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 -00 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 4a -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 ]0 EMT] 23 +50.00 25 +28.06 980 980 980 980 985 985 9]5 970 965 60 960 60 966 980 975 q 970 96040 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 4U q AO -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 4U -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 45 65 21100.00 Eno] 24 +80.00 980 980 980 980 985 DRIVEWAY 6085 RIVIER4 LANE 915 .....975 975 ........975 980.. � f � 970 I..... .....970 970 _. I 970 975.. s 965 .....965 965 ........965 970.. I.... i q 96040 -30 -20 -10 mom 10 20 30 4U 60 96 �0 -30 .20 -10 mom 10 20 30 40960 96540 -30 .20 -10 m0 10 20 30 4 9]5 9]0 965 960 955 29x50.96 0 980 9]5 9]0 965 0.°60 0 985 980 975 970 965 Crry OF SHOREWOOD WY W3B PROJECT NO.: 02925 -240 SCALE. DESIGN BY ASSHOWN DJE PLAN BY CHECK BY DJE KAK Z O c - AD K A 00`x'3 0 0 Z O w cn � w O w LL, 0 z , 0 H } z Q W ~ J � U2:): U LL � W z O w 0 z z - c = 0 af .6 0 w LL af w w D 0 Z (Y Q 0 CROSS SECTIONS C.P. SHEET 17-04 C8.01 ',. DRIVEWAY z 9]5 9 975 960 6o80 RIVIERA LANE 1970 9 970 I I� 9 970 976 965 965965 9 9101 980 975 q 970 96040 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 4U q AO -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 4U -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 45 65 21100.00 Eno] 24 +80.00 980 980 980 980 985 DRIVEWAY 6085 RIVIER4 LANE 915 .....975 975 ........975 980.. � f � 970 I..... .....970 970 _. I 970 975.. s 965 .....965 965 ........965 970.. I.... i q 96040 -30 -20 -10 mom 10 20 30 4U 60 96 �0 -30 .20 -10 mom 10 20 30 40960 96540 -30 .20 -10 m0 10 20 30 4 9]5 9]0 965 960 955 29x50.96 0 980 9]5 9]0 965 0.°60 0 985 980 975 970 965 Crry OF SHOREWOOD WY W3B PROJECT NO.: 02925 -240 SCALE. DESIGN BY ASSHOWN DJE PLAN BY CHECK BY DJE KAK Z O c - AD K A 00`x'3 0 0 Z O w cn � w O w LL, 0 z , 0 H } z Q W ~ J � U2:): U LL � W z O w 0 z z - c = 0 af .6 0 w LL af w w D 0 Z (Y Q 0 CROSS SECTIONS C.P. SHEET 17-04 C8.01 9]5 9]0 965 960 955 29x50.96 0 980 9]5 9]0 965 0.°60 0 985 980 975 970 965 Crry OF SHOREWOOD WY W3B PROJECT NO.: 02925 -240 SCALE. DESIGN BY ASSHOWN DJE PLAN BY CHECK BY DJE KAK Z O c - AD K A 00`x'3 0 0 Z O w cn � w O w LL, 0 z , 0 H } z Q W ~ J � U2:): U LL � W z O w 0 z z - c = 0 af .6 0 w LL af w w D 0 Z (Y Q 0 CROSS SECTIONS C.P. SHEET 17-04 C8.01 995 DRIVEWAY 995 6025 RIVIERA LANE 998 - - -- - - -- -- 990 A � a 985 I I .....985 988 - - -- - -- 9980 97S ,1n .7n 21 in n In 2n 'in ld75 C 995 995 DRIVEWAY 6040 RIVIERA LANE 990 990 A 985 I � 985 980 .....980 9]5,10 -30 2p 10 m0� 10 20 30 4U 55 m RIVIERA LANE 28x30.00 28 +25.00 995 990 985 980 0.°95 CIFY Or SHOREWOOD WTI rI ME PROJECT NO.: 02925 -240 SCALE. DESIGN BY ASSHCWN DJE PLAN BY CHECK BY DJE CAN Z c O V) W K —� 0,-, w 0 W (n W LL O W co 0 z 0 H H �_ U) J 0- W 0 LL � LE z O w o z — x 0 z <LL�0 J 0w LL af w LET D 0 Z Q o CROSS SECTIONS C.P. SHEET 17 -04 08,02 MANN LANE s +so.00 M-0 99 98 98 97 C 0 D DRIVEt", ',, DRIVEWAV DRIVENAV 25405 MANN LINE ',.. 5885 EUREKA ROAD ',, ',, ',, ',,. 25350 MANN LANE �o �a 990 .....sso sso sso sso.. m m o m a m 990 mn om a I om Im ,a of a Im 385 - - -. I - -` - - -_— 985 985 Nn W 985 985.. i I ....985 980 .....4980 980 9980 980.. 37540 -30 -20 -10 m0 10 20 30 40]5 97 No -30 -20 -10 m0 10 20 30 4x75 97 -00 -30 -20 -10 m0 8980 10 20 30 40]5 99 98 98 97 C 0 D 0 990 990 990 990 m �` r ° am m ,p nm m m 2n a °oo m — A 5 — — — — ....985 985 F°'..... _... ........985 985.. _ < Im 0 9980 980 _ _ 9980 980.. 540 -3D -2 -10 °0 10 20 30 4U ]5 915 -30 -2o -to m0 10 20 30 40 75 975JO -30 -20 -10 m0 10 20 30 4 990 985 980 09]5 2 +50.00 4 +50.00 6 +50.00 995 990 985 980 975 995 995 995 995 e m 990 990 -- 990 990 a d� Ays dm om i m m �n -_ 985 985 I m 985 985 .....980 980980 75 9]5 75 975 995 990 985 q q 9980 ml .40 .30 .20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 ' -40 -30 .20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 -40 -30 .20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 75 2 +00.00 4 +20.00 6 +00.00 sss 990 985 980 995 995 995 995 DRIVEVV4V DRIVEWAV 25J 10 MANN LANE 25425 MANN LINE o a 990 990 990 990 — .— __'- ....985 985 n I - -- .._...985 985.. — ,980 980 98o 980 995 990 985 q q 9980 9]540 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 4075 97 Ao -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40]5 97540 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40]5 Crry OF SHOREWOOD WV VV3B PROJECT NO.: 02925 -240 SCALE. DESIGN BY ASSHOWN DJE PLAN BY CHECK BY DJE KAK Z c O N K A 00`x'3 0 O�iz 0 W (n W � W zz 1 J 02 LL W U W z g 0 W 0 z z � , F 0 <2 LL of � ozs J 0 W af LL W W Z:) 0 z af Q 0) CROSS SECTIONS c.P. I SHEET 17-04 C8.03 DRIVEWAV 25405 MANN LINE 990 985 980 09]5 2 +50.00 4 +50.00 6 +50.00 995 990 985 980 975 995 995 995 995 e m 990 990 -- 990 990 a d� Ays dm om i m m �n -_ 985 985 I m 985 985 .....980 980980 75 9]5 75 975 995 990 985 q q 9980 ml .40 .30 .20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 ' -40 -30 .20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 -40 -30 .20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 75 2 +00.00 4 +20.00 6 +00.00 sss 990 985 980 995 995 995 995 DRIVEVV4V DRIVEWAV 25J 10 MANN LANE 25425 MANN LINE o a 990 990 990 990 — .— __'- ....985 985 n I - -- .._...985 985.. — ,980 980 98o 980 995 990 985 q q 9980 9]540 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 4075 97 Ao -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40]5 97540 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40]5 Crry OF SHOREWOOD WV VV3B PROJECT NO.: 02925 -240 SCALE. DESIGN BY ASSHOWN DJE PLAN BY CHECK BY DJE KAK Z c O N K A 00`x'3 0 O�iz 0 W (n W � W zz 1 J 02 LL W U W z g 0 W 0 z z � , F 0 <2 LL of � ozs J 0 W af LL W W Z:) 0 z af Q 0) CROSS SECTIONS c.P. I SHEET 17-04 C8.03 995 990 985 q q 9980 ml .40 .30 .20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 ' -40 -30 .20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 -40 -30 .20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 75 2 +00.00 4 +20.00 6 +00.00 sss 990 985 980 995 995 995 995 DRIVEVV4V DRIVEWAV 25J 10 MANN LANE 25425 MANN LINE o a 990 990 990 990 — .— __'- ....985 985 n I - -- .._...985 985.. — ,980 980 98o 980 995 990 985 q q 9980 9]540 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 4075 97 Ao -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40]5 97540 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40]5 Crry OF SHOREWOOD WV VV3B PROJECT NO.: 02925 -240 SCALE. DESIGN BY ASSHOWN DJE PLAN BY CHECK BY DJE KAK Z c O N K A 00`x'3 0 O�iz 0 W (n W � W zz 1 J 02 LL W U W z g 0 W 0 z z � , F 0 <2 LL of � ozs J 0 W af LL W W Z:) 0 z af Q 0) CROSS SECTIONS c.P. I SHEET 17-04 C8.03 995 990 985 q q 9980 9]540 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 4075 97 Ao -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40]5 97540 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40]5 Crry OF SHOREWOOD WV VV3B PROJECT NO.: 02925 -240 SCALE. DESIGN BY ASSHOWN DJE PLAN BY CHECK BY DJE KAK Z c O N K A 00`x'3 0 O�iz 0 W (n W � W zz 1 J 02 LL W U W z g 0 W 0 z z � , F 0 <2 LL of � ozs J 0 W af LL W W Z:) 0 z af Q 0) CROSS SECTIONS c.P. I SHEET 17-04 C8.03 99 99 98 98 9] C 0 N m 990 Mm m 2 0 8980 =J0 -30 .20 -1n m0 10 M 3n 4n 75 C 995 990 z 985 980 9]5 z Z c o- w a�- 00`-'3 0 0 W (n w 0 W 0 Q uz): J W U LL 0 W z 20 W 0 Z z 0 = 0 JLL�0 J 0111 LL W W 0 Z Q U) CROSS SECTIONS C.P. SHEET 17-04 C8.04 9]0 965 960 9S5 m SHOREWOOD LANE ss +E.oO M-0 A - - - - -. -- - - - -. - - - -. 970 970 - - - -. - - -- - - - -. - - - -. - -- 970 965 -. - - - -. - - - -. - -- - - - -. z z 5625 SHORE 1000 5625SHORE \VCOD _. _ _ -- 965 965 -. - I - - - -. - - -. - - - -. - -- 965 960 -. - - -- - - - -. - - - - -. -- - - - -. - - - -. 960 960 55 955 - - -- - - - -. - - - -. - -- 960 955 55 950 -. - - - -. - - - -. - -- - - - -. 965 960 4 q 8955 NO -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 -00 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 4a -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 _30V 50 EEL] 66 +40.00 68 +25.00 980 980 975 975 975 975 9]5 970 965 66 955 55 955 970 965 q q 5960 960J0 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 4U AO -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 1 -JO -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 4U 55 63180.00 Eno] 6] +65.00 980 975 970 965 960 980 975 975 9I5 DRIVEWAY ',, ',, ',, ',, ',,DRIVEWAY',, ',, DRIVEWAY ',, ',, ',, ',,DRIVEWAY',.. 5625 SHORE COO ',. ',. ',. 5625 SHORE! GOD 5625 SHOREWOOD '',. ',. 5625 SHOREWOOD LANE LANE LANE LANE - - - - -. -- - - - -. - - -- 975 970 - - - -. - - -- - -- - - - -. - -- 970 970 -. -.. - - - -. - - -- ' "-` -__ -____. - - - -. - - - -. 97D 965 `� - - - -. - - - -. -- - - - -.I - - - -. -- -965 965 -. - - - -.I - - - -. - - -. I - -- - - - - -. -- - - - -. - - - -. 965 960 - - - -. - - -- - - - -. - - - -. - -- 960 960 -. - - - -. - - - -. 60 955 55 9�5 975 970 965 q q 8960 ml .40 .30 .20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 -40 .30 .20 .10 0 10 20 30 40 ' -40 -30 .20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 55 63x00.00 65 +50.00 6] +03.00 980 975 970 965 980 975 ',, ',, ',, ',, ',, 975 975 DRIVE\VAV .DRIVEWAY 5625 SHOREWOOD ',,. ',,. 5625 SHORE COD A LANE LANE F 975 970 970 970 I p A - -. i -`\ - -- 970 965 `" - -- - -- -- - - - -.I - - -. 965 965 -. - - - -. I - - - -. - - -. I - - -. - - - - -. -- - - - -. - - - -. %5 960 - - - -. - - -- - - - -. - - - -. - -- 960 960 -. - - - -. - - - -. 975 970 965 q 8960 9594' 0 30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 4p 60 95A0 -30 -20 -10 1 10 20 10 40055 95540 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 4055 CIFY OF SHOREWOOD WTI rI WSB PROJECT NO.: 02925 -240 SCALE. DESIGN BY ASSHOWN DOE PLAN BY CHECK BY DJE CAN N O a N W K A 00`x'3 0 0�w LL, O w 0 w OQ00 tz u2:): J W U LL W z O � w o z z � F 0 <�LL�0 J 0111 LL af W w Z:) 0 z Q U) CROSS SECTIONS c.P. I SHEET 17 -04 C$ -05 DRIVEWAY D DRIVEWAY '.. DRIVEW�AV 5625 SHOREVXOD 5 5625 SHORE 1000 5625SHORE \VCOD - - - - -. -- - - - -. - - -- 9 975 970 - LANE L 970 970 - LANE LANE A A � � A A 970 965 - -.- I - - - -. - - - -. -- - - - -. - -- 9 965 965 - -. - - -_Z5 - -p - -. - - -- % %5 960 - - -- 9 960 960 - - 970 965 q q 5960 960J0 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 4U AO -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 1 -JO -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 4U 55 63180.00 Eno] 6] +65.00 980 975 970 965 960 980 975 975 9I5 DRIVEWAY ',, ',, ',, ',, ',,DRIVEWAY',, ',, DRIVEWAY ',, ',, ',, ',,DRIVEWAY',.. 5625 SHORE COO ',. ',. ',. 5625 SHORE! GOD 5625 SHOREWOOD '',. ',. 5625 SHOREWOOD LANE LANE LANE LANE - - - - -. -- - - - -. - - -- 975 970 - - - -. - - -- - -- - - - -. - -- 970 970 -. -.. - - - -. - - -- ' "-` -__ -____. - - - -. - - - -. 97D 965 `� - - - -. - - - -. -- - - - -.I - - - -. -- -965 965 -. - - - -.I - - - -. - - -. I - -- - - - - -. -- - - - -. - - - -. 965 960 - - - -. - - -- - - - -. - - - -. - -- 960 960 -. - - - -. - - - -. 60 955 55 9�5 975 970 965 q q 8960 ml .40 .30 .20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 -40 .30 .20 .10 0 10 20 30 40 ' -40 -30 .20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 55 63x00.00 65 +50.00 6] +03.00 980 975 970 965 980 975 ',, ',, ',, ',, ',, 975 975 DRIVE\VAV .DRIVEWAY 5625 SHOREWOOD ',,. ',,. 5625 SHORE COD A LANE LANE F 975 970 970 970 I p A - -. i -`\ - -- 970 965 `" - -- - -- -- - - - -.I - - -. 965 965 -. - - - -. I - - - -. - - -. I - - -. - - - - -. -- - - - -. - - - -. %5 960 - - - -. - - -- - - - -. - - - -. - -- 960 960 -. - - - -. - - - -. 975 970 965 q 8960 9594' 0 30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 4p 60 95A0 -30 -20 -10 1 10 20 10 40055 95540 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 4055 CIFY OF SHOREWOOD WTI rI WSB PROJECT NO.: 02925 -240 SCALE. DESIGN BY ASSHOWN DOE PLAN BY CHECK BY DJE CAN N O a N W K A 00`x'3 0 0�w LL, O w 0 w OQ00 tz u2:): J W U LL W z O � w o z z � F 0 <�LL�0 J 0111 LL af W w Z:) 0 z Q U) CROSS SECTIONS c.P. I SHEET 17 -04 C$ -05 975 970 965 q q 8960 ml .40 .30 .20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 -40 .30 .20 .10 0 10 20 30 40 ' -40 -30 .20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 55 63x00.00 65 +50.00 6] +03.00 980 975 970 965 980 975 ',, ',, ',, ',, ',, 975 975 DRIVE\VAV .DRIVEWAY 5625 SHOREWOOD ',,. ',,. 5625 SHORE COD A LANE LANE F 975 970 970 970 I p A - -. i -`\ - -- 970 965 `" - -- - -- -- - - - -.I - - -. 965 965 -. - - - -. I - - - -. - - -. I - - -. - - - - -. -- - - - -. - - - -. %5 960 - - - -. - - -- - - - -. - - - -. - -- 960 960 -. - - - -. - - - -. 975 970 965 q 8960 9594' 0 30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 4p 60 95A0 -30 -20 -10 1 10 20 10 40055 95540 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 4055 CIFY OF SHOREWOOD WTI rI WSB PROJECT NO.: 02925 -240 SCALE. DESIGN BY ASSHOWN DOE PLAN BY CHECK BY DJE CAN N O a N W K A 00`x'3 0 0�w LL, O w 0 w OQ00 tz u2:): J W U LL W z O � w o z z � F 0 <�LL�0 J 0111 LL af W w Z:) 0 z Q U) CROSS SECTIONS c.P. I SHEET 17 -04 C$ -05 975 970 965 q 8960 9594' 0 30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 4p 60 95A0 -30 -20 -10 1 10 20 10 40055 95540 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 4055 CIFY OF SHOREWOOD WTI rI WSB PROJECT NO.: 02925 -240 SCALE. DESIGN BY ASSHOWN DOE PLAN BY CHECK BY DJE CAN N O a N W K A 00`x'3 0 0�w LL, O w 0 w OQ00 tz u2:): J W U LL W z O � w o z z � F 0 <�LL�0 J 0111 LL af W w Z:) 0 z Q U) CROSS SECTIONS c.P. I SHEET 17 -04 C$ -05 NOTES'. 1. SEED AND SOD PLACE M ENT TO BE DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER IN THE FIELD. 2. CONTRACTOR TO PROTECT EXISTING TREES AND LANDSCAPING (INCIDENTAL). 3. REDUNDANT PERIMETER CONTROLS USED MAY BE SILT FENCE OR BIOROLL. 4. PIPE OUTLETS NEED RIPRAP WITHIN 24 HOURS. SEE SHEET C9.04 FOR EROSION CONTROL NOTES. LEGEND' STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE TEMPORARY STABILIZATION'. CAT.3 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET OR TYPE 38843 MULCH PERNIANENTSTABILIZATION: SOD PERMANENT STABILIZATION: MnBOT SEED I IIX 33 -261 @ 35 LBSIACRE WITH TYPE 3 FERTILIZER AND TYPE 3884.8 MULCH O INLET PROTECTION ARCLASS III RIPRAP AND FABRIC FOR OUTLET (SEE SPEC) — BIOROLL SILT FENCE CONCRETE WASHOUT AREA 1 � RIVIERA LANE R /I�/ S\ lllllNF n EI 6155 I � r � � I \ ail ®��aa - - - -- =r 6155 -- A ' -• / v 6985 ! l l INSTALL DOUBLE PERIMETER ! CONTROL Z II I, I\ I II I 0 30 60 I I I I \ I SCALE IN FEET \ � I cLry or SHOREWOOD WTI rI Ammmmmm WSB PROJECT NO 02925 -240 SCALE. DESIGN BY AS SHOWN DOE PLAN BY CHECK BY DJE NAP z Z O w K A 6_a O z O W (n w LLO W O z >O H u2i: J W U LL � W z 2 O � x W o o zz - <��LL�0 J O w LL W W O Z Q U) EROSION CONTROL c.P. SHEET 17-04 C9.01 NOTES J YELLOWSTO 1. SEED AND SOD PLACE M ENT TO BE DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER NE TRAIL J �' J IN THE FIELD. J ' 2. CONTRACTOR TO PROTECT EXISTING TREES AND LANDSCAPING (INCIDENTAL). I 3. REDUNDANT PERIMETER CONTROLS USED MAY BE SILT FENCE OR BIOROLL. 4. PIPE OUTLETS NEED RIPRAP WITHIN 24 HOURS. SEE SHEET C9.04 FOR EROSION CONTROL NOTES. J LEGEND I STHBILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRHNCE I I J TEMPORARY STABILIZATION'. CAT. 3 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET OR TYPE 38843 MULCH _ PERNIANENTSTHBILIZATION: SODi _ II1 WITH TYPE 3 FERTILIZER 1P T IEED 261 @ 35 LB&ACRE AND TYPE MULCH O INLET PROTECTION. �r� —, 3 +00 `1 ti CLASS III RIPRAP AND FABRIC FOR OUTLET (SEE SPEC) —.. BIOROLL Iwo —sr— SILT FENCE I) CONCRETE WASHOUT AREA J ' J fj' J� 0 30 60 H.lQTtO ' !, ! i ol� i i I 24140 i I 0 3o so ii 24270 - ® v scALE w FEET 2-00 _ _ 4 �Y3 +oo z INA 6030 - LLJ Qf; i4 r -- 1.1 A I CITY OF SHOREWOOD WY Ammmmmm WSB PROJECT NO 02925 -240 SCALE. DESIGN BY AS SHOWN DOE PLAN BY CHECK BY DJE NAP z Z O K A 6_a 0 Uj F- O�iz O W (n W LL O W O Q >O U U=): J � W U W z 20 W o Z z — F O <2 LL : OZ5 J O W LL af W z O LY Q On EROSION CONTROL c.P. I SHEET 17-04 C9.02 NOTES. M MANN LANE 1. SEED AND SOD PLACE M ENT TO BE DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER IN THE FIELD. 2. CONTRACTOR TO PROTECT EXISTING TREES AND LANDSCAPING (INCIDENTAL). 3. REDUNDANT PERIMETER CONTROLS USED MAY BE SILT FENCE OR BIOROLL. 4. PIPE OUTLETS NEED RIPRAP WITHIN 24 HOURS. SEE SHEET C9.04 FOR EROSION CONTROL NOTES. LEGEND: STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE TEMPORARY STABILIZATION'. CAT.3 EROSION CONTROL . . BLANKET OR TYPE 38843 MULCH PERNIANENTSTABILIZATION: SOD PERMANENT STABILIZATION: MnDOTSEEDI.1IX 33 -261 @3 IWITH T TV PE 3 FERTILIZER AND TYPE 3884.6 MULCH O O INLET PROTECTION 5 +60— III RIPRAP AND FABRIC FOR OUTLET (SEE Z 0 30 60 H SCA E FEET SHOREWOOD LANE Em FIRE DEPT. rc 24100 W sszs� ----- --— —=�\ -- CIFY OF t SHOREWOOD WSrI { �( WSB PROJECT NO.: - 02925 -240 ' - SCALE: DESIGN BY AS SHOWN DOE PLDJECHECK BY DJE : KAY. N Z c O o z Q Q w A 6_a O�iz 0 ED C/) w 0 w ln� OQ z_ U) J W U LL W z 2 O w o Z z — x 0 <2 LLof � OZ5 J 0 w LL af w z D 0 Q U) EROSION CONTROL c.P. I SHEET 17-04 C9.03 CIFY OF t SHOREWOOD WSrI { �( WSB PROJECT NO.: - 02925 -240 ' - SCALE: DESIGN BY AS SHOWN DOE PLDJECHECK BY DJE : KAY. N Z c O o z Q Q w A 6_a O�iz 0 ED C/) w 0 w ln� OQ z_ U) J W U LL W z 2 O w o Z z — x 0 <2 LLof � OZ5 J 0 w LL af w z D 0 Q U) EROSION CONTROL c.P. I SHEET 17-04 C9.03 z Q Q w A 6_a O�iz 0 ED C/) w 0 w ln� OQ z_ U) J W U LL W z 2 O w o Z z — x 0 <2 LLof � OZ5 J 0 w LL af w z D 0 Q U) EROSION CONTROL c.P. I SHEET 17-04 C9.03 NOTES'. 1. SEED AND SOD PLACE M ENT TO BE DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER IN THE FIELD. - -. -- - - (INCIDENTAL). 3. REDUNDANT PERIMETER CONTROLS USED MAY BE SILT FENCE OR BIOROLL. 4. PIPE OUTLETS NEED RIPRAP WITHIN 24 HOURS. SEE SHEET C9.04 FOR EROSION CONTROL NOTES. LEGEND' STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE TEMPORARY STABILIZATION'. CAT.3 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET OR TYPE 38843 MULCH PERM NENTSTAMUZATION: SOD PERMANENT STABILIZATION: —OT SEED MIX 33- 261 @ 35 LB51 5580 WITH TV PE 3 FERTILIZER AND TYPE 3884.8 MULCH I _ O INLET PROTECTION O II _ T -T 6 CLASS III RIPRAP AND FABRIC FOR OUTLET (SEE SPEC) O O w ~� T — BIOROLL l —sr— SILT FENCE _ _ SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES: 1. SEDIMENT CONTROL MUST BE IN PLACE AND APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER BEFORE ANY PHASE OF CONSTRUCTION CAN BEGIN. 2. IF A 50 NATURAL BUFFER AROUND A SURFACE WATER IS INFEASIBLE, REDUNDANT PERIMETER CONTROLS MUST BE PROVIDED. REDUNDANT MEASURE TO BE INSTALLED 3 -5' FROM THE PRIMARY MEASURE WITH STABILIZED AREAS IN BETWEEN THE TWO BNIPS. 3. INLET PROTECTION WILL BE INSTALLED AT ALL CATCH INLETS WITHIN THE PROJECT AREA PER STANDARD DETAILS. 4. TEMPORARY STABILIZATION MEASURES SHALL BE EMPLOYED WITHIN 200' OF THE NWP OF ALL DISCHARGE POINTS WITHIN 24 HOURS. MULCH IS NOT AN APPROVED MEASURE. 5. IN THE EVENT THAT PERMANENT STABILIZATION CANNOT BE IMPLEMENTED WITHIN 14 DAYS AFTER CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IN THE DISTURBED AREA HAS CEASED, TEMPORARY STABILIZATION BNIPS MUST BE SCHEDULED TO OCCUR WITHIN THAT 14 DAYTIME FRAME (EXCEPT WHEN THE NOTE ABOVE APPLIES). fi. A SEDIMENT TRAP MUST BE INSTALLED PER THE APPROVED STANDARD DETAILS WITHIN 24 HOURS OF CONNECTING THE UTILITIES. ]. ALL STOCKPILES MUST HAVE DOWN GRADIENT PERIMETER SEDIMENT CONTROL IMPLEMENTED AND MAINTAINED AT ALL TIMES. STOCKPILES TO RECEIVE TEMPORARY STABILIZATION IF UNWORKED FOR 14 DAYS. 0. STOCKPILES MAY NOT BE PLACED WITHIN ANY DRAINAGE OR CURB LINE UNLESS PROPER BYPASS IS INSTALLED PRIOR TO STOCKPILE PLACEMENT. EROSION PREVENTION PRACTICES: 1. STABILIZATION OF DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE DONE BY PERMANENT TURF ESTABLISHMENT WHENEVER POSSIBLE. 2. PIPE OUTLETS MUST BE PROVIDED WITH TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT ENERGY DISSIPATION WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER CONNECTION TO A SURFACE WATER. DEWATERING AND BASIN DRAINING'. 1. IN THE EVENT THAT DEWATERING OPERATIONS NEED TO OCCUR, A DEWATERING PLAN MUST BE SUBMITTED AND APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER BEFORE ANY OPERATIONS TAKE PLACE. THE PLAN MUST BE DEVELOPED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SWPPP GUIDELINES. POLLUTION PREVENTION MANAGEMENT MEASURES: 1. A ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE WILL BE PLACED AT ALL ENTRANCES THAT LEAD TO THE PROJECT SITE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN AND THE APPROVED STANDARD DETAILS. 2. ALL STREETS IN AND PDJACENTTO THE PROJECT SHALL REMAIN CLEAN AND PASSABLE HT ALL TIMES. ADJACENT STREET AND CURB LINE TO BE SWEPT FREE OF DEBRIS AT THE END OF EACH WORK DAY, GRAS OFTEN HS NEEDED TO ENSURE PUBLIC SAFETY. 3. SLURRY FROM CONCRETE OPERATIONS MUST BE VACUUMED UP IMMEDIATELY. NO CONCRETE WASHOUT SHALL COME IN CONTACT WITH THE GROUND AND MUST BE PROPERLY DISPOSED OF. 4. ALL HAZARDOUS MATER14LS MUST BE KEPT UNDER COVER AND WITHIN PROPER CONTAINMENT WHEN NOT IN USE. 5. A SIGN MUST BE INSTALLED ADJACENT TO EACH CONCRETE WASHOUT FACILITY. MISCELLANEOUS: 1. ADDITIONAL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MAY BE ADDED DURING ANY PHASE OF CONSTRUCTION AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. 2. CONTRACTOR TO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL MAINTENANCE. 3. ENSURE THAT NO VEHICLES OR EQUIPLIENT IS STOREDJPARKED ON KNOWN WELL LOCATION AREAS. CITY OF SHOREWOOD WTI rI Ammmmmm WSB PROJECT NO 02925 -240 SCALE. DESIGN BY AS SHOWN DOE PLAN BY CHECK BY DUE NAP z Z O K A 6_a 0 z O Lu LI.( w O w O<02btz_ U) _J U _ W � z LL z 2! 2i O ' w O < 2 = : of �J Ow LL af w w Z:) O z (Y Q U) EROSION CONTROL c.P. SHEET 17-04 C9.04 STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) NARRATIVE PROJECT LOCATION /DESCRIPTION PROJECT ITS NAME: RIVIERA LACE, SHOREWOCD LANE & MANN LAVE STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT PROJECT N TABERS: WSB 02925 -249 PROJECT LOCATION: STREET RIVIERA ME C /'"Of NSH SHOREWOOD CODE, NNEPIN STATE: M- NNFSO,A IP 55331 LATITUDE /LONGITJDN 44,_945/ - 93.5858 CONTACT INFORMATION /RESPONSIBLE PARTIES THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD ONES THE LAND, ADJACENT SO DE, ADD EASEMENT AREAS ASSOCIATED WITH THE PROJECT. THE CITY OF SHCREWCOD IS THE OWNER REAMITTEE APPLYING FOR PERMIT COVERAGE ADD WILL BE RESPCNSIELE FOR DEVELOPING THIS SWPPP ADD THE LONG-TERM MAINTENANCE PLAN OF THE PERMANENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM FCR THIS PROTECT ITICAELE). THE SHOWS API;. ENSURF, THAT THE DESCRIBED WORK -J TF.F SWPPP IS EEINC- _I.P..FTFD BY TO' OPERAT R PERM "TEE, OWNER /PERMI'TTEB: CITY O_ SBOREWOOD (LAARY BROWN, P.W. DIRECTOR) 5 COUNTY CLUE ROAD SET _R WOOD' MN 55331 952 -9E0- 7913 /LBROWNaSEOREWOODPN.COM THE PRIMARY CONTRACTOR -'ILL ENTER INTC A CONTRACT WITH THE CITY OF SHCREXOCD TC COMPLETE THE REQUIRED WORK FOR T - IF. Ell IN. PRIMARY CONTRACTOR WILL BECOME TNDER CO --1 THE OPERATOR CO - E -E ON THE MINES (TEROUGH EXECUTION F A SPD-S PERMIT MODIFICATION FORK), AND THEREBY AGREE TO IP'IPLEME:T THIS SWPPP INECCOPERA ION mIT THE OWNER- E OFF. -I TS RRS.C"T'L , FOR DFVN CITNG A CHATO I- LTTY PRTOR TO S ARTTN„ .:011STR TC,: RRFER TO A T SWPPP ENDMEN SECTION) . THE NPDES FERMI- MQDIFICATION "CFI+ SHALL BE CPNP TED TO ,HE MNLI AFTER THE PROTECT _ IS AWARDED TO THE FRIMARY CCNT.RACTCR, PRIOR TO LETTING THE PROJECT. THE OPERATOR ''BILL INSURE THAT INDIVIDUALS OVERSEEING OR I.MPLEMENTING THE SWPPP RAVE BEEN PROPERLY TRAINEE- AND THAT ON <TTPICATIONS WILL BE MADE AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST. TIHS INCLUDES ANY SUB - CONTRACTORS T_ --I THE OPERATOR EMPLOYS -R SEPARATE CONTRAS ERCSICN CONT'IRCL SJPE1VISQR SPALL F _. AJTHCRI"_ O/ER ALL OPERATOR OPERATIONS A IF- GENIE NFDES PERMIT CMPLIANCE, INCLUDING GRADING, EXCAVATION, BRIDGE CCNE..RUCTION, COLVERT INSTALLATION, UTILITY WORK, CLEARING. /GRUBB -N L_WATERING, AND ANY OTHER OPERATION THAT INCREASES THE ERCSICN POTENTIAL IN THE PROJEC=T THE OPERATOR WILL IMPLEMENT AND BRINTP.IN BMPS FOR TH DLRA__ON OR CONSTETCTIOR PROJECT. THE OPERATOR WILL COMPLETE THE REQJ!EED BITE INSPECTIONS, AND IS RESPONSIBLE FOR III— PERSIST REQUIREMENTS PART II B, TT.C, IIS.B -F, IV, V, AND APPLICABLE -DESTRUCTION ACTIVITY REQUIREMENTS FOUND IN APPENDIX A, PART C TO REMAIN IN COMPLIANCE WITH NPDES PERMIT. O PERATQ /PL rc,;ITiEE: (TO BE L..TER`9INFD TH.tOU =GH TRANSFER OF NPDES CSW PERMIT) S WPPP D N.� } „xpe r.� Erasion —d Storm .a v58 & ASSOCIATES, E INC, ,CORY BO:TELL) ”" 701 XENIA AGE SCUTH, SLIT 330 md..g, —Wt MINNEAPOLIS PN 55416 KOtX�Otff1E(( 763-76E-266c/CP(UNELLdWXVENV . CCD maces "" WATER RESOURCE ENGINEER 7511 A A SOCIATES, INC. (BILL ALMS] AWMH ATE. 701 XENIA AVE SOUTH, SUITE =I NNEAPOL IS, MN 55a 15 .. -. 763 - 231 - 4545 /EALMSEWSEENG. COM PROJECT DESCRIPTION & SCHEDULE THE PROJECT _NCLOPED STRAET AND UTILITY IMPROVE -E-S TG RIVTEAA LANE, SHOREWOOD LANE, AND MANN LAN N THE CITY 07 SHOREWOOD, N-DRESOTA. CLEARING AND GEODETIC OPERATIONS, GRADING TEMPORARY eSC PPRIL SFPTFMRS, 20_8 J CURB I WJTT_,A /SIDE.ALK, UTILITIES APRIL SEPTEMBER 2818 PA 111 MAY - OCTOBER 2918 PRE - CONSTRUCTION IMPERVIOUS SURFACE AND DISTURBED AREA CALCULATIONS TOTAL AREA TO BE DISTURBED = 2."--5 ACRES MFERVICUS AREA PRE - CONSTRUCTION = 1.733 ACRES /POST- CONSTATCTION = 1.88"1 ACRES NET INCREASE 01 I"% —TIOTS AREA 154 ACRD.. PERMANENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS THE NPDES PERMANENT WATER QUALIT °- VOLIER (PART' II I.D) FROM THE NET NEW IMPERVI'US SURFACES OF THR 1R.1XCT IS NOT REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT CONSIDERING THE NET INCREASE OF IMPERVIOUS AREA IS LESS THAN 1 ACRE. LOCATION OF SW$PY COM{6NENTR PARTICLE RISE RANdR, (wo DESC'RIP'TION' TITLE LOCATION . . SWPPP NARRATIVE S.PIR N AGRATIV. PLAN SET SITE CONDITIONS SWPPP NARRATIVE FLAN EET SITE MAP SWPPP NARRATIVE PLAN SET CONSTRUCTION PHASING / STAGING, BUFFERS, & AREAS NCT TO BE DISTURBED S11-1 NARRATI N FLAN SET DIRECTION OF FLOW (PRE- /POST - CONSTRUCTION) DRAINAGE PLAN PLAN SET P- PERVIOUS SUR =ACES "EMPCRARU EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS /STEEP SLOPES (,:1) CONSTRUCTION FIND & PRCPI-,E TEMPORARY ERCS ON AND SED_MBN_ CONTROL PLAN, NARRATIVE PLAN SET SWFPP PLAN SET :RMA:]ESDT EROSION CONTROL BMPS TURF ESTABLISHMENT PLAN, SWPPP NARRATIVE PLAN SET STORM SEWER DRAINAGE PLAN '... PLAN SET GRADING GRADING PLAN ''.. PLAN SET ESTIMATED IMP QUANLI T =ES ESTIMA LL QDAN'iITIES PHA*! SRI GNP DETA -LS S ECIFICATIONS DISC. DET TLS, SWFPP NARRATIVE '.. PLAN SET EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS, SOILS, & WATER RESOURCES SOILS AND NATIVE TOFEOS L: NATIVE TOPSOIL WILL BE STRIPPED AND STOCKPILED FOR FINAL GRADING OPERATION , WHERE NDICATED I E CONSTRDCTION PLANS AND SPECI F TCATIONS. HELTHODS AND EQUI T MINIMIZE SL COMPACTION PROPOSED F LTACTION AREAS, DRIP SINE OF TREES TO BE PRESERVE`m, C., SCALE BE Da EP ,SNAG BY THE OPARATOR'SNSWPFF AMENDMENT, TRACKED VEHICLES AGE PRENEGRED AND WHEELED VEHICLES AGE DIECO-iA'ED IN THESE AREAS. URDA, wRCi. MAPRS'D SOTS S,UR$SY bNTV NU-. PFRCENS'AG'8: $ STATE TEXTURE., SLOPE PxEcA TAoR i]F PRflSEi"T: SAND, AREA Et1. RS 2;QQxi PARTICLE RISE RANdR, (wo SILT {(I,.6Ag U.RSJ CY:AY C <U. dY32} +37B- AGNES PAM 2-6t BLCPES c0 2e -52% 2S-SO% 48-7" -22C2- LESTER LOA)'_ 6-10Y BLCPES 1.1 24 -52% 48-78& -23A- CCRDOVA LOAN, % SLOPES 1 .2 21 -52% 28 P 48 -78% - LE L 5 E SUR LOAM, 1 % SLOPES 18.7 e- 28 -5U% 48 -781 U6B- URBAN LAND ODOR BENT'S, - .^, -6`s SLOPES 6.7 ./A N/A N/A X41 C2- LEST R ILKE'_YNY ^CNIPLEX, 6-10% 4.2 25 -45% 17 -53% 55 -80% L36A HAMEL, O RKASH PANEL COMPLEX, C -3% 3.4 0 -50% 50 -58% --282 LESTER I.—, SO -6% 3.1 4-52% 2 28 -50% 48 -78% U URBAN LAND UDOR NTI 9 1% SLOPES G C N/A IS 4A_ CLAY -DAN, 0 -1% SLOPES 1.9 20 -45% N/A 17 -53% N /P_ 55 -SO% L26A SHOREW OD SILTY CLAY LOAM, . -3% SLOPES 1.5 0 -20% 40 -72% 80 -100% UTA UDOR HENTS, 0 -2% SLOPES 1.3 I/A N/A N/A -22F- LESTER LOAM, 25 -35% SLOPES 0.9 21-521 28-50% 48-78% DESCRIPTION QI RECEIVING HATERS 'LOCA7ED 4- ST OR BAIT Q - S SHOREWOOD CAME BE CO T AN EXIT NG STORE SEWER SYSTEM" UL MATE Y CISC{AR HIN INTC L R MIN'NETONKA. MANN LANE DRAINS TO A IE T' AID ON THE NO AT _ID F DUE ROAD AND IS CONVEYED T THE ES „SIN AN XISTING STORM SEWER SYSTEM. RIVIERA LANE DNA NS TO M LTTPLE SNDS /4I —ANDS ON THE SOUTHWEST, EAST, AMC NORTHEAST SIDE 0 n.. PRO EST AREA. MOST OF THE PROPOSED DRAINAGE WILL BE OTTLETED TO THE POND TO LEE SOCTLIAEST OF THE PRCCECT AREA. DESCRIPTION IT IMPAIRED WATERS DR WATER SJB T T TMD A S -ECI AND IMPAIRED WATERS SEARCH WAS COMNIFTED INING TH A MPCA SEARCH ENGINE (--TTP P A GI C2 2CA TOTE fN.[ /CS - N., EX TM -- N 3 2 T8 BASED ON .IS R ✓IEW -'ERA A NO SPECIAL OR IN AI.ED WATERS (XI-H .BONS R.:_TI JN —RELATER I'HAIB EN s LJC .ED WITHIN I.ME MILE CF, AN- C NETREAM OF ANY PROJECT DISCHARG POINTS. LAKE MINNETINGA INDICATES AN EPA-APPROVED IMPAIRMENT FOR MERCURY IN FISH TISSTF; nOWEVER -I IS NOT CONSIDERED A. CONSTRUCTION RELATED IMPAIRMENT. THEREFORE, APPENDIX A REQUIREMENTS DO NOT APPLY TO THIS PROJECT. POTENTIAL FOR SEDIMENT AND /OR OTHER POLLUTANT (S) DISCHARGING FROM THE PROJECT SITE PRECIPITATION F-EQUEN Y ESTIMATE FOR TEE PRC ECT LOCATION WAS REVIEWED AND USED FOR ANTICIPATED !NCPECTI N R QUErCP NESTS', AND ESTIMA NG CONSTRICTION ACT ]IT=S _K THIS SWPPP. AL=AS 14 RESULTS DO NOT DEcESSARILY REFLECT ANY DESIGN CA:TERIA IN THE PERMANENT ETDRMWATEER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. ROUTINE INSPECTION ADD IMP NIA- NTENANCE BY THE OPERATOR IS CRUCIAL IS ENSURING THE FUNCTION LITY OF EACH IMP. STE SLOPES AN OTHER ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREA_ HAT ARE AT A HIGHER RISK 11 S I_ILITA—D ARE LL!INED IN TEE S (II APPLCABLEf c(ry or SHOREWOOD WrI B WSB PROJECT NO.: 02925 -240 SCALE. DESIGN BY AS SHOWN DJE PLAN BY CHECK BY DJE KAK LL O of iz p ED C/) w O LU Q O � Z_ U) J0� W U L LL LL z- O w 0 Z z — � = O 0 J Ow LL af W LU Z:) O z Q o5 U) SWPPP C.P. SHEET n-O4 C9.05 CONSTRUCTION PHASING /STAGING, BUFFERS, & AREAS NOT TO BE DISTURBED THE PRESERVED AREAS OF EXISTING VEGETATION WILL BE IDENTIFIED ON THE PLAN SHEETS AS "DO NOT DISTURB AREA". THE OPERATOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PRESERVING A S0 FOOT NATURAL -LIFER DR (IF ?NFEASIBLE) PROVIDE RE➢ENDAN ED -MEN" CONTROL BMPS, WHEN A SURFACE WA TEx IS LOC =E W T Al FEET AND RECEIVES D NAGE FROM THE PROJECT S GRA�RING IT TIE. THIS REQUIREMENT DOES NOT APPLY TO ADLACENTVROAD SIDE DIT-^_HES, JIGGICIALICLUETY DITCHES, STORMWATER ^CONVEYANCES, STORM DRAIN INLETE, OR SIB EN- BASIN. TIEIE IS NO CONSTRJCTTON IHAS7GX CR S FLING D E OWNER F PROTECT. -.E SCHEDULE FCR INSTALLING TEMFORARY BMPS SHALL BE INCORPORATE➢ INTO E;IEEOPERATC SHWEEKLY SCHEDULE SIR EA..cI CONSTRUCTION STAGE NC PRESENTED TO THE GWNR'S REPRESENTATIVE (PER MNDCT SPEC 1?1?.D). ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREAS STEEP SLOPES: THERE ARE NO PROPOSED STEEP SLOPES FOR THE DESIGN OF THIS PROJECT. STEEP SLOPES BAY BE TEMPORARILY CRE OPEC DURING GRADING OPERATIONS, AT WHICH TIED, TEMPORARY 3MDS MUST BE IMPLEMENTED By THE OPERATOR WITHIN 14 GAYS OF CEA..— WCRAING CA THE STEEP BUD — CONTAMINATED PROPERTIES: THE MICA'S "WHAT'S IN MY NEIGHBORHOOD" DATABASE iPCA- GIS02.FCA. STATE .MN.US /IVIMN2 /INDEX.HTML`, HAS -REVIEWED ON 03/01/2018. T RESULTS Cl THIS F IIW SHOW NO -A- I PROPERTIES CR L'nP.K SOURCES LOCATEDIWWeHIN AMC ADJPCENT TO THE PROJECT LII +.I TS FF STCRMWA-ER POLLUTION MITIGATION MEASURES IDENTIFIED FROM ENVIRONM&NEAL REVIEW . NO FORMAL ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW WAS REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT; THEREFORE, NO ADDITIONAL STORMWATER- RELATED MITIGATION MEARDRES APPLY. FORS- ANDERS THERE SHE GO PRING SAYST A—B WITHIN OR CERTIFIED TO THE INUCTECT LIDITS. SITE PIAV REQUIRED AREAS: NO AREAS OF "HIGH ENVIRONM REAL RISKS' ARE KNOBS TO IS LOCATFC WITHIN OR I MEOTATEL-Y A—CENT TO THE PROUECT LIMITS. FLOOD CONTINGENCY PLAN- NO PRODECT ACTIVITIES AR c CATDD W THAN A G0 YEAR FLICOPLAT. CR FLCOCWAY N D-O E, A FLOOD A XTINDEWAY PENN IS NAT REG III THE PROTECT ENGINEER (PTT GRAIN EISIGITTCAl MAY REQUIRE A AR.C.PFRACTI1. FLOOD CONTINGENCY PLAN FOR SPECIFIC PROJECT ACTIVITIES AND AREAS THAT ARE ?l:,'_' LOCA.TEC IN A 190 -YEAR FLOOCPLAIN CR - COMEDY. IS .. EXC SIGN CAT S PROJECT C N - ACTIVITIES ARE HOT PROPOSED WITHIN I ➢NR DATEREODIES. FISH EXCLUSION DATES CC NOT _CRT TO THIS PAR ..C_. WETLANDS: THERE ARE NO WETLAND IMPACTS PROPOSED WITH TBIS PROJECT. DRINKING WATER SUPPLY MAMA EVENT AREA [D-WSMA': THE PROJECT ICS LOCATED IN THE SHOREWOOD 3 FTKSIA. TH RE-CF., SPECIAL CARE MUST BE TAKEN WHEN RESPONDING TO SPILLS ON SITE ADD CRAMILING RAZARCCDS MATERIALS, SCI AS CONCRETE WASHOUT, ED LING OPERATIONS ETC. SO -HAT THE DRINKING SUPPLY DOES NOT BEFORE CONTAMINATED. A 'ELHFAD PROTECTION PLAN SRAEL BE DEVELOPED ND SUBMITTED TO THE PROJECT ENGINEER AT LEAST 10 DAYS PRIOR TO LAID _ISTL'RENCES. INSPECTION, SWEET AMENDMENTS, RECORD KEEPING, & TRAINING 1. THE SWITI CHAIN CF RESPONS BIL TY _. -5- BE AMENDED BY ERA -OR WHEN THE IDENTITY OF RESPONSIBLE SITE OPE 0 ., —CS-0- - CONTROL SUPERVISOR, CC TRAP O E-C. ' BROWN _. THE OPERATED MUST INSPECT THE ENTIRE CONSTRUCTION SITE AT LEAK= ORC. EVERY SEVEN (7) DAYS DURI C ACTIVE CONSTRUCTION AND WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER A RAINFALL EVENT GREATER THAN 9.5 INCHES IN 24 HOURS. THE OPERATOR SHALL PRC IDE A RAIN ALL GAUGE ON S-TE, WITHIN CARE MILE OF THE SITE, OR SOURCE OF THE WEATHER REPORTING SYSTEM TF'_4T DIES SI"E SPECIFIC HPINFA;.L DATA FROM RACA-R SUMMARIPS. THE LOCATION AND SOURCE OF THE RAINFALL CADGE 02 REFGRTING SYSTEM MUST BE COCUME.NT IN =HE FIRST EN'PPP INSPECTION REPORT. THE INSPECTION FREQUENCY MAY BE REDUCED TO ONCE PER MON-H, IF SITE CONDITIONS MEET PART IV.'E.3 OF THE NODES PERMIT. ALL INSPEC'IONS AC:- —DEFENCE CONDUCTED MUST BE RECORDED IR .'RITE -LAG BY THE OPERATOR AND RETAINED WITH THE SWPPP, RECORDS OF EACH INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE ACTIVITY SEA LL IN --DD A. E, _ OP C) LI - TIONS� B. N N.,B 02 SPECIFIES, LUD =LAG MMENDA" OARS FOR CORRECTIVE ACTIONS; C. CORRECTIVE ACTIONS TAKEN _ACLUDINC LATEF, TIMES, ND PARTY COMPLETING MAIN - MARCH ACTIVITIES); INCLIDING DOCUMENTATION /PHOTOS OF IMPLEMENTED B INTENDED I CORRECT A PROBLEM TOTT FAILED. D T ANC AROUND OF ALL- RA N ALL EV NTS EATER THAC S IN '£S. 'N 24 HOURS; 6ESTATICN F AD IS MODE PC THE SWPPP 3 WP AMENDMENTS ADD EI"E PLANS WILL BE LREP ARED BY THE ODE OR ND SUBMITTED TO THE OWNER FOR P V- W ND WRI T N APPROVAL BY THE 'ROD CT OWNER R -S7 TED REPRESENTATI✓E1. ALL CAN ACCEPTED AND DENIED SWPPP ANENDKENTS AND SITE PANS MRS - - B RECCR E- IN R TINI RETAINED PITH THE -EVEP 4. THE SEEK' IIALL 21 AIDNING) G INFULAN ATPIITI0 AL OR MODIFIED BERS, DESIGNED 0 CORRECT -IF-- ROBLEMS O R ADC SITUATI N UNDER PA III B G H. SIDE P R T , PI TOR TO CONDUCT -NC FINN ..TP.GBS�PHASES OF THE - PRO ECT, AS REQUIRED BY OWNER NC DEFILED IN THIS PROTECT SWPPD. S. THE SW PPP - COP IRS), - PP PI _ - n N RECORDS MLA_ SCG.'T T S c G_TEO ➢J _ I OPERATOR _C HAS OPERATIONAL .-O 1 0_ THAC PO TIONOF THE SITE. THE SWPPP CAN BE KEPT N TEEN FIELD O^FICE OR ON -SITE V { CLE D"JRING NX AL WORKING FOURS. 6. TEE O C MU SSTGN A IN - L(S) --S Tc PARTS III - . O O RSE IMPLAMMUCATION, -AINTE\PNCn ND ATEP R OF SIPS. . \DI ✓I C[IPP S) SHPL,. ALSO P_LFOR NSPECT NS DIFT E /AMEN➢ THE GWP P DOCr ENT IN SWPPP AS NECESSAR`! , ND BE AV -LAE-E FOR AN ONS T IN ECTION WITHIN ,2 HOURS UPON REQUEST BY THE ERMITTED OWNER (OR ITS DESIGNEE) O.. L GOVERNMENT UNIT, R IPC_A. POLLUTION PREVENTION MANAGEMENT MEASURES POTE_?TTI L SOURCES F CK —ANTS PROM CONS RU `ON= ACTIVITIES INC UDE. • SEC M N: ROD Fr„_TIVE GUST GENERATED ROM CLEARING BUD GRUBBING IMP- ..RT /ElD XT OPERATIONS REMOVALS /COMPACTION, CAS ,FINE GRADING, EXCAVATION , TRENCHING, TOPSC' STRIPING O'KPILING, ET /DRY PAN- LENT C`JTT NC, STREET CONSTRUCTION. • BASIC /ACIDIC PH LEVELS ANV. C=URB NC GUTTER, MANHOLE STRUCTURES, SIDEWALKS, DRIVEWAY APRONS, FCONDAT_IONS, BRIDGE ABUTMENN, NIT /C _ E.. T CUTTING, MASONRY WASHO.I /CLEANC -T. • EXCESS NUTRI EHIS FROMVIANDSCAPING INSTALLATIONS, SOIL ADDITIVEC, FERTILIZATION, MULCHING. • .°,YDROCREBONS FROM STREET CONSTRUCTION, DEMOLITIOWNFIF PITS, WET /CRY PAVEMENT CUTTING. OPERATOR WILL COMPLY WITH ALL OF -H BOLT UEION PREVENT -ON AND `. CEMENT NEAEJRE IJE\_I-IED IN THE NODES CW EMIT, PART aV F 1 TN ACCIT N C ERATOR LL COMP Y WITH STATE RULE 1011 015 ON DUST PREVENTS CV REQJIREMENTS. ..PERPTCR WILL A-11T A SPILL PR OS PIGS AND R-SPCNSE P A- (S ) TO TH NGINEER O ANY CONSTRICTION ACTIVITY. REPLACE A D DISPOSAL OF CONS_RUC--PN AND rA AIDOUS WAS S B_ COMPLINCE WITE MPCA REGULATIONS. CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY REQUIREMENTS (PART IV.): EROSION CONTROL PRACTICES, PROCEDURES, & MAINTENANCE STANDARDS THE OPERATOR S RESPONIBLD FOR E INSTALLATION, OPERATION, AND CONTINUED MAINTENANCE OF ALL TEMPORARY AND 'RM NENT A:ER QUAL TY MNtiGEM N. BMOC AS W AS AL' EROSION P E'ENTION AA DIMENT C N'ROL BMPS FOR THE PRA -.ON O THE COXNT_CTION XCRK AT THE SIT lTIL FINAL STABILIZATION IS A E EVED. AL BMPS MUST BE ADEQI TELY LOCATED, DEETGNED, INS T..FLEED, AND MAINTAINED TO PREVENT EROSION INCH A MINIMUM 0 5 INCH TOTAL RAINFALL EVENT WITHIN 24 HOURS. ALL NON'FU_NCTIONAL BMPS MUST B - LA-CEC, OR SUPPLEMENTED W FUNCTIONAL BMPS B D CF TEE lEIT BUSINESS D Y AFTER D ISCOVERY, EGREASI SOON ASPF CONDITIONS A ' .4 F.CCIS JNLERS ANOTHER TI MEEFMW IS RFECIFIEC I THE SWPP:.AALL ERODED MATEF.IAL THAT LEAVES THE SITE SHALL BE COLLECTED BY 'THE OPERATOR PNT AETURNED O THR SITE ATV THE OPERATOR'S EXPENSE AND INCIDENTAL TC THE PROJECT COST. TEMPORARY OiR PERMANENT STABILTZAT 0- THAI! BE NITIATED AS SOON AS POSSIBLE, BUT NO LATER T-HA T=E END OF THE NXT W RK PACT FOLLOWING THE DAY EARTH DISTURBING ACTIVITIES IN THAT PO CN OF TBE S TE HAS TEMPCRARILY OF PERMANENTLY C-ABEE. ALL EXPOSED SOIL AREAS SHALL BE S°ABIu ZED WITHIN i4 DAYS AFTER THE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IN THAT PORTION OF THE SITE H EME RARI LY Oft PEA MNENTLY CEASED. I - TI A- C STABILIZATION I 5 C NED AS C OMP. LETING ON✓ (OR MORE) OF THE FOLLO ING:SO PREPARATION FCR VEGETATION, MUiCHING (OR OLH A EEMPORARV NON - VEGETATIVE GNP;, SE VINO /PLANTING, OR SCHEDULING STABILIZATION MEASURES TC BE FULLY INSTALLED ADD COMPLETED WITHIN THE 14 DAY TLINICAME. ALL EXPOSED SOILS WI 1% 200 FE T AND DRAINING TC A CNR PUBLIC WATER MUST BE STABILIZED WI IN 24 HOURS OF TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY_ CEASING WORK CURING THE FISH SPAWNING PERIOD. TEMPORARY TTOCRIPLES WITHOUT SIGNIFICANT SILT, CLAY, CA ORGANIC COMPONENTS (E.G., CLEN AGGREGATE STOCKPILES, DEMOP PAN CONCRETE STOCKPILES, SAND STOCKPILES) ARID THE .MNIMUCTEJ BASE COMPONENTS OF ROARS, PARKING LOTS AND SIMILAR SURFACES ARE EXEMPT FROM THIS F.EQUIREMENT. TEMPORARY & PERMANENT EROSION CONTROL EMPS RAP D IABIL Z TION METH t TN S -C P SHALE CNSI T OF OPERATIONS N C SAR TO SAPID_ S A.ITTE SMALL CRL'I'ICAL AREAS w_ HIN 200 EE J SURLFAC� ATER_ =C REV_N_ OFF BILE SED I[ NIA -ION ND OPO CCMrLY .vI TF :.xM'T RE-QUIREEMENTS. INSTALL PER MNDOT SPECIFICATIONS 25`)5.3 N. OD /SEEP I" X: PGROT SEED MIX ANp /OR SOD WITH APPROPRIATE MNDOT FER"TLIZEP, WILL BE USED AS PENCTUMENT COVER FOR ALL EXPOSED GROUND AREAS PER MNUFACTURERS SPECIFICATIONS. EROS ON CONTR BLANKET A MITER- CLASSIFIED I N ONTROL BLANK - SHALL RE ADDED -N COMBINATION N; TL SEED ERT TC A L _ S SLO T 3 1 O LR_A. , HIRE PRIORI - ARIAS, AS ,ELL AS _N OR NEAR DITC- BOTTO CIS TC ESTABLISH PERMANENT�ROS ON CON ROL, YL O MU CH YP' 4 fib B HLRAL—C SOIL S"A UREA IN C M INA-I N I' L A TACKS IER TILL B- INSTALLED PER ANUFACTU ERS SPECIE A -IONC TO EXPOSED SOILS AREAS TC ROVIDE TE ORARY LONG TERM OR FE MANEV- COVER FCR VEGETATIOR ESTABLISEVET. — ARIAS OF EXPO ED SOIL T— AR£ NC CO. L ED E I: TIE LINT R WILL BE ITAR IZED H TYPE 4 CERTI I D AS WEED FREE ADJACENT -0 WE- V CH ID SCA -ER CLADS L O-HER PISTUR6 I AREAS SHALL B STAN_LIZED o A LCOU _SE ALTS CA.. 0 VE S _ ECIF C W_.H N THE A. Pp ALL EXPOSED SCIE_ CHILD eTSTABI =ZED BEFORE .AISSTP.UCTION S COMPLETED FOR THE SEASOti, 10 'M SEW R OLTL' -S 1PE OL' -E 5 MLS HA✓ 1 I'- PC_RARY OR FRRNIANENL LNERAf C1SS Pe_L'LOV WITHIN 4 HC[;?S nFIER HIDRAFTLIC CONNED LONG O A RECEIVING SURFACE WATER. CONSTRUCTZON ACTIVITY REQUIREMENTS (PART IV.): SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES, PROCEDURES, & MAINTENANCE STANDARDS PERIMETER CONTROL BMPS SHALL BE INSTALLED ON ALL DOWN GRADIENT P R ME"'ERS AND UP GRADIENT CF NY BUFFER AREAS, PRIOR TC INITIATING UP GRADIEN3' LND F STLRBNCE A.. _VITIES. IPLND PERIMETER CONTROLS BMPS SNLL BE PLACED AS CLOSE AS ACSS-BLE :'C FOLLOW A SING E CON CUR E-ESITTON. ALL SIL F NCES Ni B- RERAIEED REPLACED, OR MAINTA AIN WHEN THEY BICCME NONFUNCTIONAL OR T,E SEDIMENT REACHES L/2 CF THE HEI_HL ., FEE FENCE. ALL REPAIAS MUST BE COMPLETED BY THE END OF : E NEXT BUSINESS D Y PITER DISCOVERY, OR AS SOON AS FIELD CONDITIONS A ACCESS. FLOATING S ,MT CTRTP.IN SHALL BS - .STALLED AS CHOSEI. THE NH..RELINE AS POSSIBLE FOR SHONSTAOR /IN -WATER SHORT -TERM CONSTRUCT_OP ACTIVITIES. REC- DED, REMOVED A D STABILIZ O- M' - PLACE W N (7) C S CF O ININ`G ACCESS P...MITTEES -I. RESPONSIBLE FOR CCN ACZING ALLELOCAL, REGIONA.,, MEDIA, NDx FEDERAL AGENCIESAAND RECEIVTN AP PLICABUE PERMITS, PRIOR TG CONDUCTING ANY WORK. CrY OF SHOREWOOD WrI B WSB PROJECT NO.: 02925 -240 SCALE. DESIGN BV. AS SHOWN DIE PLAN BY: CHECK BY: DJE KAN LL Lu z w � w O LIT' . w O z o w z O t � Q W U Ld zz -LL owo Q Q LL F U J Ow LL w w D U af af z U) SWPPP C.P. SHEET 17-04 C9.06 IF THE DOLE GRADIENT TREA'I'MEN- SYSTEM IS OVERLOADED, ADDITIONAL UP GRADIENT ED-MENT CONTROL PRACTICES OR REDUNDANT BMPS MUST BE INSTALLED TC ELIMINATE THE AND THE SWPPP ..S- RE AMENDED TO IDENTIFY THESE ACDITICNAL PAACTICES OVERLOADING, TEMPORARY & PERMANENT SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS S -DI "EN CCN -ACL FOGS BIGRCLL ^III- BE STATED PLACED -N ACCCRN A\ E To HE PLAN HEFTS -KIM THE SIDE SLOPES OFF CF TEE Ro CC .I 1 o s s N NEAR s-o LES e ROLLS - L. T -H A STAFSv LATER IA A CLEANED OTT REPLACED WHEN 1E D -MEN REACHES 1/2 OF E 'ATANT 11 THE ROLL MR H-NE SET ED S_ET FENCE SILT FENCE WILL BE PLACE IH ACCORDANCE TO THE PLAN SHEETS WHERE THE SIT PAS OFF OF THE PROJECT LOCATION AT MORE "=.AA\ 3 GRAD -ENT AS WELL AS NEAR CRITICAL WETACER AREAS "B-11 A S:.COREPAY REECERA \T 'MP THE BMR WILT BE CLEANED 0'T OR R ILACEJ WFEN -RE SEDIMENT REACHES 1/2 HE FEIG-T OF THE FENCE IS MPCRARY STOCARIDEA ALL STCREPILISS MUST BRAD S FENCE OR E UI✓ALEN- EE NE ER FE I`dENT C.N'.ROLS WPLEM N-ED AND T'AI _ S -LEE O E C BL O S-- CE E .NCI G STGAM O- *VEYANCES SL H AS C RR v➢ GET ER SYSTEMS, A CGISELI S AND D_T HES UNLESS THERE TO A BYPASS IN 1-11 -o INFIENT SONFERNITE. RUN -CH LIGGE TIE STOCKPILE. CONSTRUCTION SITE EN RANCELVEH _LE TRACKING. OPERATOR MOST MINTRIE. FROM LEASING THE CONSTRUCT_" SITE (OR ONTO STREETS HIV THE S BY IMILEMENTINo B PS PLAR AS SOCK PADS, SIEsNI MULLE1, CONCRETE OR STE - RE, K CP EQUIVALENT SYSTE S STREET SWEEPING MUST BE USED DAILY DURING COGS R C --ON OPERATIONS IF SUCH BMMPC ARE NOT ADEQUATE TO PRESENT SEDIMENT FROM BEING TRACKED ONTO THE STREET. TRACKED C MEN'T MUST BE REMOVED FROM ALL PA✓ J SURFACES (ON AS GFF SST ) EITHIN 24 ROCKS O Ol ER1 DR SOONER AS DIRECTED BE THE PROJECT OWNER. MULTIPLE STREET SWEEPINGS AT THE OFE C S EXPENSE MAY BE AR D-REC ON ALL ENEY/EXT 0 SITE AT THE ITSCRNTIIN OF TIES ..SECT G'O'NER. N !GIET F T ION ALL STORM 'RAIN INLETS NCLJDING DOWN GRADIENT OFF-SITE) MUST BE PROTECTED BY APPROPRIATE EMPS ING O S C -10 ALL SOURCES C - OR C 2G NG TO - V - SILT NCE IS NCI A A EPTAR C AS N LE RC ON BM COMPACTOR SHAW CLEAN, AE O✓ AN IS- S_ OF SEDIMENT, AND /CR HE PiAIF STORE DRAIN P C EC ON CV A ROUT-NE ROUT—NE BASIS TO ENSURE THE CEVICF E FN —Y FUNCTIONAL PRIOR TO THE NEXT 02ECAS EJ PRECIPITATION EVENT OR GREATER) INLIT INDIECIT-TH MAY BE REMOVED FOR A PARTIC_- , -L..I INTEL IF A SEE C IFIL EADETY CO (STREET OO Do, G) HAS BEEN ECINTIFIED AND E SI HAS RECEIVED WRITTEN CORRESPONDENCE FROM .BE JG - IEDI ONAL AU OR Y 'E.G ITY /CQUNTY O-TSHIP/ T ENGIN ER VER- =YINC E NEED FOR REMNAAL RI - I N CO RESF NDENCE MUST BE DOCUMENTED IN E-PPP AND ANY -LABLE 'THIN 72 ADURS UPON REQUEST PERMISE OF TO REMOVE INLET PROTECTION BASED CN A SPECIFIC SAFETY CONCERN MUST S IL'- BE OBTAINED ISOM THR LOCAL jUNI SSICTIORAC AUTHORITY WITHIN IS DAYS OF REMOVAL. HEM -CAL TR_.ATM NTS OPERATES MIST AMEND THE S PP' C M LODE THE INTERNED USES AX_- _A ATI NS OF FLC CLLANTS PC YMENS, AND --HER SEDTIENTATION TREATMENT CHEMICALS. CHE4 -CAL TREATMENTS MAE ONLY BE A PL ED IN AREAS WHERE TREATED STO E. EA S DIRECTED C -EC I G SEDIMENT CONTROL SYSTEM OT EC DISCHARGED _O LATER BODL. ES GCZ EN JOSING, APPLICATION S) INC' , E.B E RATES /Q\TITIES, AND MCNITOR -AN PERE TS UAS.DIT., IEL TEMPORARY /PERMANENT AAINAG KITCHEN & SHALES THE NORMAL WDTTXD PERTN(RTER 2 RAR 24 HOER PAECIPT_A ICI EVENT) OF OR FROM THE POINT OF DISCLARGI I- J ANY SURFACE WATER 'WITHIN 2= FICIN IT CANDECTICK, CHANNEL MUST BE STABILIZED WITHIN 14 DAYS ALL STORMENTER CONVEYA4 E CHP.N4ELS MIST USE DISSIPATION DEVICES WITHIN AND ALCM THE LENTTS LENT OF THE CHANNEL AND AT ANY OUTLETS. _EM S-ALEC I= ARE BEING USED AS A TEMPORARY SEDIMENT CONTAINMENT SYSTEM 'WITH PROPERLY D RO LS, SILT -I {DS FLY." CO HOT M1 ED TO BD S A ZCD THESE A1 11H DUST BC S AB 22ED W PEI C ITT LED AS A SEDIMENT CC TA - E - SYSTEM ULKF. .1 SOM—CH, --ITT— , G C -YACRY PERIMETER OF A P-TCH, _ RYE, OR OTHER ALEFPCE WATER COCKRYA.FITI ARE NOT ACCEPTANIF F -H DLS C.,N A L THE CONTRA -OR I I R i INTEL TO READ AND UNDERSTAND THE FOLLOWING MRNAEFNTA RULE I G' I C 1 50 AND THE O LC-IN- NO PERSON MAY CATA7 OR PERM -T THE HAND' -ING TRANSPORTING OR STY R CG OF ANY MATERIAL -11 A MANNER WHICH ALI NS O F -1 ALT 'I CONTEINLA-A TYCLIATI MATY.R TO B :. AT-ORNE, EXCEPT F B OTHERWISE R..I D HE CONTRACINI MAY NOT CAUSE ARE PERMIT THE CO \S RUC N REPAIR DEMOLITION, JR PER OE UNF V C NE-N.-III AREAS WITHOUT FIRST PUT__NG NTC EFFECT AN ONGOING PAC AAM USIN --E BEET PRACTICAL 1T HODS TO PREVENT PARTICULATE NATTER FARM BECOMING AIAR CORE. DUST FROM THE SITE WILL BE CCNTROGLED BY INCREASED STREET NEEPING AND USING A MOBILE A SS'RE -TYPE DIS"'RIBUTO£ CRGCK TO PPP ABLE WATER TO DISTURRED AREAS THE MOBILE UNIT --._L APPLY WATER AT A RATE NECESSARY TC PREVENT -O D BOILING. DEWATERING STREAM DIVERSION AND BASIN DRAINING F - ING IS p R - G - -CTN - SU T I - AVcP.m I` C HE PROTECT - GINEER FEE 1120VAL PRIOR TO N EAT -NGm THESE A-TIVI- E6 DEWA ER NG PAN MUST INCLUDE B1 TO NNRVN-T SEDIMENT 'RAN-SPORT, ER E-..N A \C ADIER'X TEPRIT. O DOWNSTREAM REC.IV_NG WATER1. THE DE AT.RI \G PLAN MUST E ALSO INCLUDE ANY SPECIFIC STA LI 5 FOR O R CTI h A ITIESNON A RECEIVING ATE ODY E OPERATOR UST I h A S S2Y P'S TO MEET THE ASS D WLA, THE DE WATERING 'LAN -1 DEC AIR OPEIATION PERT] sIL 'DIFF PART OF THE FARIP, WATER THAT is AS SEDIMENT BEST B E DISCHARGED . = _ EM O OR P SEDIMENTATION S EN (D /. . - A .. APFRO'E- T BMPS) C THE :AOJECTSITE WHENEVER PCSST L_ DISCEWYGE FROM THE TEMPORARY IF PER'-'- SE➢ .ENTFTION BASIN MUST BE VISUALLY NECKED TO ENCIRE ADEQUATE TREATMENT IS ORTA VED IN THE BASIN AND I NU_SAN E CONDITIONS (SEE MILS R. 7050 210 SO 1. ), IMPACTS TO WET_ANC , AND ERCSION I4 REIX- NG CHANNELS AN DKENSINTE PRC'ERTIES WILL NOT RESDET FROM THE DISCHARGE. THE DPSCHA_RGE MUST BE DISPERSED OVER NATURAL ROCK RIORAP, SAND BAGS, PLASTIC S HER TIN F G, OR OTHER ACCEPTED ENERGY DISSI PATICN MEASURES. A E SEDIMENTATION CONTROL REA -RULE AND ADDITIONAL FILTRATING NEAR ARE REQUIRED FOR DISCHARGE HATER THAT CONTAINSSUSPENDEC SOLIDS, OIL, OA GREASE. FINAL STABILIZATION RJEW, STABILIZATION IS ACHIEVED N' I NPDES COE PARIS F_ 5. ARE CCMFLFTE➢ P E TO SUBMISSION OF THE NOTICE OF TERMINATON TO MACA. SEE PERMANENT EROSION CONTROL PRACTICES FOR SPECIFIC METHODS AND APPLICATIONS. t i F - , _ NE 'g .!x C 111 Fi PDt m -� ` E E r L - _ _ [�A - MN $ v e - T ED # E° .D� r. _R � A 1z T MADE f Pr0]eci Loca:iers ,.��. ,".. -� §{ 1 I OCR B.MB, I Mile Buffer F z AA, n A Discharge Points l v r N41.1 _ 1 "TIA Iiot impaired Waters v,� ' DNR Public Waters " Not Highly Erodible Land _ -.''x' Potentially Highly Erodible Land i x , Y 6L _ r'\_ - ^ - Highly Erodible Land - ::'� - ' + 0 2.500 s F Figure 1. SWPPP Resource Map CIFY OF SHOREWOOD WrI B WSB PROJECT NO.: 02925 -240 SCALE. DESIGN BY AS SHOWN DUE PLAN BY CHECK BY DOE KAK U LLJ F F O � w O LL cf) W (n W W OQ00 LZ U) J W U w z g 0 w 0 Q Q LL O J 2 �: go J OW LL af w w D O z Q o5 U) SWPPP C.P. SHEET 17-04 C9.07 #8c MEETING TYPE City of Shorewood Council Meeting Item Regular Meeting Title / Subject: Approve Easement, 5745 Echo Road Meeting Date: May 29, 2018 Prepared by: Alyson Fauske, PE, City Engineer Reviewed by: Attachments: Easement Policy Consideration: Should the City approve a drainage and utility easement for 5745 Echo Road? Background: Runoff from most of Echo Road currently drains to a culvert at the low point in front of 5745 Echo Road. At some point pipe was installed within the driveway to convey the discharge from the culvert to the east; this pipe no longer functions. Currently discharge from the culvert goes down the driveway and has cause some erosion off the side of the driveway as it continues to the pond north of Mary Lake. This culvert on Echo Road will be replaced with storm structures with the reclamation project, which will discharge on the north side of the driveway, consistent with the existing drainage pattern. To better manage the runoff at this location the pipe within the driveway should be replaced and energy dissipation installed at the outlet to reduce the potential for erosion. This work was not included in the reclamation project as it lies outside of the city right of way. In order to install and maintain this pipe the city needs an easement from the property owner. Once an easement is secured staff can proceed with obtaining quotes to install the storm sewer. Recommendation / Action Requested: Staff recommends approving the drainage and utility easement for 5745 Echo Road. Mission Statement: The City of Shorewood is committed to providing residents quality public services, a healthy environment, a variety of attractive amenities, a sustainable tax base, and sound financial management through effective, efficient, and visionary leadership. Page 1 GRANT OF EASEMENT CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5745 Echo Road THIS GRANT OF EASEMENT is made on the day of , 2018, by ROBERT W. SHAW and ROXANNE S. SHAW, husband and wife (Grantors), to the CITY OF SHOREWOOD, a Minnesota municipal corporation (Grantee). RECITALS Grantors are the owners in fee simple of real property in the County of Hennepin, Minnesota, located at 5745 Echo Road, PID 3311723140037, which is legally described on Exhibit A attached hereto (the Easement Tract). Grantee desires to use a portion of the Easement Tract for the construction and maintenance of drainage and utility improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the sum of One Dollar ($1.00) and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged by Grantors: 1.) Permanent Easement - Grantors hereby grant to Grantee, its successors and assigns, a permanent easement (the Permanent Easement) for drainage and utility purposes over, under, upon and across that portion of the Easement Tract legally described on Exhibit B, and graphically depicted on Exhibit C. The Permanent Easement shall permanently run with the title to the Easement Tract and shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the parties hereto and their respective heirs, successors and assigns, including, but without limitation all subsequent owners of the Easement Tract and all persons claiming under them. 2.) Use of Easement Tract - Grantors hereby agree that they will not perform or allow or cause the construction of any improvements on the Permanent Easement which could damage or obstruct the Permanent Easement or interfere with Grantee's access to or Grantee's right to construct, maintain and repair the drainage and utilities on the Permanent Easement. 3.) Warranty of Title - Grantors represent and warrant to Grantee that they are the only owners of fee simple title to the Easement Tract, and that there are no undisclosed mortgages, contracts for deed, leases, rental agreements, occupancy agreements, or any other encumbrances or verbal or written agreement of any nature whatsoever affecting title to the Easement Tract. Grantors, on behalf of themselves, their successors, and assigns, hereby indemnify and hold harmless Grantee against and from all claims for loss, damage, or expenses which may be incurred or asserted by Grantors or any party whose consent is required to be obtained hereunder, in connection with this Grant of Easement or Grantee's use of the Permanent Easement pursuant to this Grant of Easement. 4.) Governing Law - This Grant of Easement shall be construed and governed by the laws of the State of Minnesota. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Grant of Easement on the above date. GRANTORS: By: Robert W. Shaw r� Roxanne S. Shaw GRANTEE: CITY OF SHOREWOOD 511 2 Its: City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this O1 day of 2018, by Robert W. Shaw and Roxanne S. Shaw, husband and wife. PATRICIA HELGESEN NOTARY PUBLIC - MINNESOTA .`� My Commission Expires Jan. 31, 2019 STATE OF MINNESOTA Notary Public ' � l THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: KUTAK ROCK LLP 60 South Sixth Street Suite 3400 Minneapolis, MN 55402 (612) 334 -5000 TJK EXHIBIT A Landowner's Property That part of Lots 4 and 5, lying southerly of a line running from a point in the east line of said Lot 5, distant 15 feet North of the southeast corner thereof to a point in the westerly line of Lot 4, distant 30 feet northerly, measured along said westerly line, from the southwest corner of said Lot 4, Block 1, in Echo Hills 2nd Addition, except that part of said Lot 5 lying southwesterly of a line drawn from a point on the northwesterly line of said Lot 5, distant 52.31 feet northeasterly from the most southerly corner of said Lot 5 to a point on the southerly corner of said Lot 5, according to the plat thereof on file or of record I the Office of the Register of Deeds in and for said County. EXHIBIT B Description of Permanent Drainage and Utility Easement A 20.00 foot permanent easement for drainage and utility purposes over, under, and across Lot 5, Block 1, ECHO HILLS 2ND ADDITION, as is on file and of record in the Office of the County Recorder, Hennepin County, Minnesota. The centerline of the easement is described as follows: Commencing at the Southerly Corner of said Lot 5; thence North 25 degrees 40 minutes 18 seconds East, assumed bearing along the westerly line thereof, 84.21 feet to the point of beginning of the centerline to be described; thence South 75 degrees 41 minutes 57 seconds East, 98.50 feet to the southeasterly line of said Lot 5 and there terminating. The sidelines of said easement are to be prolonged or shortened to terminate on the westerly and southeasterly lines of said Lot 5. EXHIBIT C EZPERMANENT DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT AREA = 1,970 SO. FT. N o zs sn `(] Dy: Echo Road Improvements WSS Project No. 02925 -44 Date: 12/11/17 r "�� Easement Exhibit �/%/ 5745 Echo Road AMENNEEM Shorewood, Minnesota '-M MORTGAGEE'S CONSENT TO EASEMENT DATE: MINNESOTA HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY, holder of that certain mortgage dated June 9, 2008 and filed for record as document number 4523290, in the office of the county recorder/Registrar of Titles of Hennepin County, Minnesota, hereby consents to the filing of that certain easement attached hereto. MINNESOTA HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY By: Its: STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF This instrument was acknowledged before me on as of Notary Public My commission expires THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: Kutak Rock LLP 60 South Sixth Street, Suite 3400 Minneapolis, MN 55402 TJK 4843 - 9172 - 5913.1 by MORTGAGEE'S CONSENT TO EASEMENT DATE: PRINCIPAL BANK, holder of that certain mortgage dated January 31, 2007 and filed for record as document number 43 73 606, in the office of the county recorder /Registrar of Titles of Hennepin County, Minnesota, hereby consents to the filing of that certain easement attached hereto. STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF This instrument was acknowledged as PRINCIPAL BANK By: Its: before me on of Notary Public My commission expires THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: Kutak Rock LLP 60 South Sixth Street, Suite 3400 Minneapolis, MN 55402 TJK 4843 - 9172 - 5913.1 by MORTGAGEE'S CONSENT TO EASEMENT DATE: DITECH FINANCIAL LLC, holder of that certain mortgage dated October 8, 2013 and filed for record as document number 5127537, in the office of the county recorder /Registrar of Titles of Hennepin County, Minnesota, hereby consents to the filing of that certain easement attached hereto. STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF This instrument was DITECH FINANCIAL LLC By: Its: acknowledged before as me on of Notary Public My commission expires THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: Kutak Rock LLP 60 South Sixth Street, Suite 3400 Minneapolis, MN 55402 TJK 4818 - 8583- 2034.1 by #8D MEETING TYPE City of Shorewood Council Meeting Item REGULAR Title / Subject: Storm water concerns at 24890 Yellowstone Trail Meeting Date: May 29,2018 Prepared by: Greg Lerud, City Administrator Reviewed by: Larry Brown, Director of Public Works Attachments: Proposal from Barr Engineering Policy Consideration: Should the City engage an engineering firm to review storm water plans for the MCC development? Background: The City Council has heard from Whitley and Linda Mott about changed conditions for storm water near their property on the MCC development. Engineering staff reviewed the MCC plans at the time of development, as well as after questions and issues were raised by the Motts. The public works director, city attorney, and I believe that the present circumstances call for a storm water review being done an outside engineering firm. Barr Engineering, a firm that specializes in storm water, has prepared and submitted a proposal for council consideration. Financial or Budget Considerations: The cost to do the work is not -to- exceed $12,500. Included in that amount is $2,500 in survey work to determine the actual inverts and elevations of pipes and ponds to provide as -built numbers to compare to the plan documents. Options: Accept the proposal from Barr Engineering, reject the proposal, or provide staff additional direction. Recommendation / Action Requested: In addition to providing an independent review of the plans from a firm that is /was not associated with the development in any way, the proposal also plans to determine what the as -built elevations are at the structures in question. Staff believes that the price is reasonable given the scope of what is being provided and recommends accepting the proposal from Barr. Next Steps and Timeline: Staff will implement the City Council's decision. Mission Statement: The City of Shorewood is committed to providing residents quality public services, a healthy environment, a variety of attractive amenities, a sustainable tax base, and sound financial management through effective, efficient, and visionary leadership. Page 1 INSmm' �NOIOIOIOIWWOIOIOI��UWNWiW1�W &WIGNIOW�WNNIOIWC resourceful. naturally. " engineering and environmental consultants„ May 18, 2018 Mr. Greg Lerud City Administrator City of Shorewood 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, MN 55331 Re: Stormwater Management Review— Minnetonka Country Club: Shorewood Dear Mr. Lerud: Barr Engineering is pleased to submit the following work plan and cost estimate for providing an independent review of the Stormwater management plan prepared by Carlson McCain, dated March 1, 2016, for the Minnetonka Country Club development in Shorewood. The purpose of the review is to determine if the analysis provided to the City is correct. The results of the review will be centered on the area designated as Pond 1 and the conclusions made for the management of stormwater in this and surrounding area based on concerns expressed by an area resident. Our work tasks would include a review of the HydroCAD modelling completed by Carlson McCain and determine if we are in agreement with the assumptions made in both the model inputs and the modeling results. We have assumed that no additional modeling will be performed as part of this review effort. If major errors or omissions are noted during the modeling review, we will notify City staff immediately. We will also complete a field survey of the project infrastructure constructed specifically in the area designated as Pond 1 on the Grading, Development and Erosion Control Plan provided for the project. As- builts of the infrastructure, dated 1/24/18, have been provided and our survey would cross -check the pipe elevations shown. We have assumed 2 days of survey work, which will include one or two cross sections of the grading work downstream of Pond 1 from Yellowstone Trail to OCS 1 as shown on the as -built plans. The survey will continue upstream including culverts 4, 5 and 6 as a cross check of the as -built survey. Our findings of the modeling review including inputs and results and survey will be summarized in a letter to the City. This will include a statement of agreement with the information provided for this project or a recommendation for further analysis with suggestions for modifications. We propose to complete this work on a time and expenses basis at a cost not to exceed $12,500 without written authorization. Our cost also includes one meeting with City staff to discuss our review and findings. We will be able to attend additional meetings as requested by the City on a time and expenses basis. The estimate cost for the survey work proposed is $2,500 which is included in the cost presented in this letter, and can be eliminated at the direction of the City. We are able to begin work immediately upon notification to proceed and anticipate the work to be completed within 30 days from the receiving the notice to proceed. Barr Engineering Co. 4300 MarketPointe Drive, Suite 200, Minneapolis, MN 55435 952.832.2600 www.barr.com Mr. Greg Lerud May 18, 2018 We look forward to the opportunity of work with the City on this project. If you have any questions or request additional information, please contact me at 952 - 832 -2857, sincerely, i %ber C. Obermeyer P.E'� Vice President #8E MEETING TYPE City of Shorewood Council Meeting Item Regular Meeting Title / Subject: Resolution Accepting Bids and Award of Construction Contract for the 2018 Seal Coat Project, City Project 18 -05 Meeting Date: May 29, 2018 Prepared by: Katie Koscielak, WSB & Associates, Inc. Reviewed by: Alyson Fauske, City Engineer Attachments: Resolution, Bid Results Letter and Bid Summary Background: The City annually provides for maintenance of City streets as part of the Street Reconstruction Fund as a seal coating project. Streets scheduled for the 2018 Seal Coat Project, to receive seal coating improvements are listed below and a location map is attached: Boulder Bridge Drive, Boulder Bridge Lane (north and south), Burlwood Court, Christopher Road, Club Lane, Eureka Road (south), Fairway Drive, Lee Circle, Maple Leafe Circle, Maple View Court, Meadowview Road, Nelsine Drive, Oak Leaf Trail, Orchard Circle, Park Lane, Shorewood Oaks Drive, Star Circle, Star Lane, Sunnyvale Lane, Sylvan Lane, Valleywood Circle, Valleywood Lane, Wild Rose Lane, Yellowstone Trail, and Smithtown Road. The 2018 Seal Coat Project plans and specifications were prepared as a collaborative project effort with the Cities of Victoria and Minnetrista to reduce overall project costs. The City received bids on Tuesday, May 22, 2018, and WSB has prepared a bid results letter with recommendation for awarding the project and summary of bids received. The Lowest responsive bid received is from Allied Blacktop Co., of Maple Grove, Minnesota, with their grand total bid of $381,830.40. The City of Shorewood's portion of the project bid is $169,099.40. Financial or Budget Considerations: The Capital Improvement Plan budget in the Street Reconstruction Fund is $275,000 for 2018 sealcoating and overlay improvements. Options: 1. Approve the resolution accepting bids and awarding the contract to the lowest responsible and responsive bidder for the 2018 Seal Coat Project, City Project 18 -05. 2. Reject all bids for the 2018 Seal Coat Project, City Project 18 -05. 3. Take no action on this item at this time. Recommendation / Action Requested: Staff recommends Council approve Resolution 18 -_, Accepting Bids and Awarding the Construction Contract for the lowest responsive bid received for the Shorewood schedule, submitted by Allied Blacktop Co., of Maple Grove, Minnesota, for the 2018 Seal Coat Project, City Project 18 -05. Mission Statement: The City of Shorewood is committed to providing residents quality public services, a healthy environment, a variety of attractive amenities, a sustainable tax base, and sound financial management through effective, efficient, and visionary leadership. Page 1 CITY OF SHOREWOOD RESOLUTION NO. 18 -057 A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR THE 2018 SEAL COAT PROJECT CITY PROJECT NO. 18 -05 WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for local improvements designated as the 2018 Seal Coat Project, City Project No. 18 -05, bids were received, opened on May 22, 2018, tabulated according to law, and such tabulation is attached hereto and made a part hereof, and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that Allied Blacktop Co. is the lowest responsive bidder in compliance with the specifications. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Shorewood as follows: 1. That the Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract with Allied Blacktop Co. in the name of the City of Shorewood, Project No. 18 -05, according to the plans and specifications therefore approved by the City Council on file in the office of the City Clerk. 2. That the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to return forthwith to all bidders the deposits made with their bids, except for the deposits of the successful bidder and the next two lowest bidders, which shall be retained until a contract has been signed. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD this 29th day of May, 2018. Scott Zerby, Mayor ATTEST: Sandie Thone, City Clerk PROJECT: 2018 Seal Coat Project OWNER: City of Shorewood (Project No. 18 -05) City of Victoria, MN City of Minnetrista, MN (Project No. 01 -18) WSB PROJECT NOs.: R- 011551 -000, R- 011820 -000 and R- 011911 -000 Bids Opened: Tuesday, May 22, 2018, at 2:00 pm Contractor Bid Security (5 %) Grand Total Bid 1 Allied Blacktop X $381,830.40 2 Pearson Bros., Inc. X $398,320.00 Engineer's Opinion of Cost $355,516.00 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct tabulation of the bids as received on May 22, 2018. W Fauske, PE NoDenotes corrected figure K :1011551- 000IAdminlConstruction AdminW11551 -000 Bid Summary May 23, 2018 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Shorewood 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, MN 55331 477 Temperance Street I St. Paul, MN 55101 ( (651) 286 -8450 Re: 2018 Seal Coat Project City of Shorewood, MN Project No. 18 -05 City of Victoria, MN City of Minnetrista, MN Project No. 01 -18 WSB Project Nos. R- 011551 -000, R- 011820 -000 and R- 011911 -000 Dear Mayor and Council Members: Bids were received for the above - referenced project on Tuesday, May 22, 2018, and were opened and read aloud. Two bids were received. The bids were checked for mathematical accuracy. Please find enclosed the bid summary indicating the low bid as submitted by Allied Blacktop Co., of Maple Grove, Minnesota for a total bid amount of $381,830.40 for work in Shorewood, Victoria, and Minnetrista. The Engineer's Estimate was $355,516.00. The portion of the bid for the City of Shorewood was $169,099.40. Bid amounts for each city were as follows: We recommend that the City Council consider these bids and award a contract in the amount of $169,099.40 for the Shorewood portion to Allied Blacktop Co. based on the results of the bids received. Sincerely, WSB & Associates, Inc. Alyson auske, PE City Engineer Attachment / of Building a legacy —your legacy. Equal Opportunity Employer I wsbeng.com K: \011551- 000\Admin \Construction Admin \011551 -000 LOR Sho— ood.docx Allied Blacktop Pearson Bros, Inc. City of Shorewood Schedule A - Shorewood Roadways $169,099.40 $179,888.00 TOTAL SHOREWOOD CONTRACT $169,099.40 $179,888.00 City of Victoria Schedule B - Victoria Roadways $92,570.00 $102,040.00 Schedule C - Victoria Parking Lots $13,320.00 $14,775.00 TOTAL VICTORIA CONTRACT $105,890.00 $116,815.00 City of Minnetrista Schedule D - Minnetrista Roadways $89,108.00 $86,190.00 Schedule E - Minnetrista Trails $1,303.00 $3,230.00 Alternate 1 - Minnetrista Fog Seal $15,680.00 $11,207.00 Alternate 2 - Minnetrista Fog Seal (Trails) $750.00 $900.00 TOTAL MINNETRISTA CONTRACT $106,841.00 $101,527.00 GRAND TOTAL BID $381,830.40 $398,230.00 We recommend that the City Council consider these bids and award a contract in the amount of $169,099.40 for the Shorewood portion to Allied Blacktop Co. based on the results of the bids received. Sincerely, WSB & Associates, Inc. Alyson auske, PE City Engineer Attachment / of Building a legacy —your legacy. Equal Opportunity Employer I wsbeng.com K: \011551- 000\Admin \Construction Admin \011551 -000 LOR Sho— ood.docx #10.A.1 MEETING TYPE City of Shorewood Council Meeting Item Regular Title / Subject: April 2018 General Fund Monthly Budget Report Meeting Date: May 29, 2018 Prepared by: Joe Rigdon, Interim Finance Director Reviewed by: Greg Lerud, City Administrator Attachments: April 2018 Budget Spreadsheet Policy Consideration: A General Fund budget report is provided to the City Council for review on a monthly basis. Background: The following information describes the unaudited financial results of the City's General Fund as of April 30, 2018. Comparisons between year -to -date amounts through April for revenues and expenditures are included to assist in gauging fund performance. General Fund Revenues: • Property tax revenues for the General Fund were $0 through April 2018. The first half property taxes will be received in June and July 2018, and the second half property taxes will be received in December 2018. • Licenses and permits amounted to 46.2% of budget, or $113,247 through April of 2018. The majority of the revenue consisted of building permits and plan check fees. As a comparison, licenses and permits revenues through April of 2017 were $73,009. • Intergovernmental revenues were $48,537 through 04/30/18, increasing from $43,434 recorded in the prior year comparable period. The change was due to an increase in Municipal State Aid (MSA). • Fines and forfeitures of $17,551 were recorded through 04/30/18 (29.3% of budget), as compared to $18,402 through 04/30/17. • Miscellaneous revenues totaled $121,751 through 04/30/18. Antenna rent is the largest component, and amounted to $107,159 through April 30, 2018. No investment interest earnings are typically allocated to the General Fund until the fourth quarter. • Budgeted 2018 transfers in from utility funds of $25,000 were recorded in January 2018. These include $12,500 from the Water fund, and $12,500 from the Sewer fund. Mission Statement: The City of Shorewood is committed to providing residents quality public services, a healthy environment, a variety of attractive amenities, a sustainable tax base, and sound financial management through effective, efficient, and visionary leadership. Page 1 • Total General Fund revenues (excluding transfers in) amounted to $323,268, or 5.4% of budget through 04/30/18. Revenues through April for 2018 were $49,045 higher than prior year revenues through April 2017. Expenditures: • General government expenditures through April 2018 were $527,140 (38.7% of budget), or 1.2% higher than the comparable prior period. • Council expenditures were lower through April in 2018, due to a 2017 inclusion of a 4t" of July donation, as well as 2 quarters of Lake Minnetonka Conservation District levy payments (1 quarter recorded through April 2018). • Administration costs were at 34.7% of budget through April 2018 and were 4.7% higher than the prior year. • Finance department expenditures were at 34.3% of budget through April 2018. • The Professional Services department expenditures were at 45.1% of budget, due to the inclusion of 50% of County assessor fees in January 2018. • Planning expenditures were at 43.4% of budget, including approximately $14,000 of comprehensive plan costs. Expenditures were significantly lower through April 2018, as compared to April 2017, largely attributable to 2017 employee separation payments. • Municipal building expenditures were at 49.4% of budget, due to inclusion of annual insurance costs recorded early in 2018. • Public safety expenditures were $1,000,097 through 04/30/18 (45.0% of budget), increasing 16.3% from $859,632 through 04/30/17. o Police expenditures were significantly higher and were related to payment timing differences between years (4 months of operations service recorded through April 2017, versus 5 months recorded through April 2018). o Fire expenditures through 04/30/18 were 3.5% higher than expenditures through 04/30/17. o Protective inspections were at 35.7% of budget through April 2018. • Public works expenditures totaled $308,036 through 04/30/18 (25.2% of budget), increasing from $190,195 through 04/30/17. o General public works operating costs were higher through April 2018, but were at just 20.6% of budget. o Ice and snow removal expenditures were $84,224 (73.9% of budget) through April 2018, as compared to $27,350 through April 2017. • Parks and recreation expenditures amounted to $79,175 through April 2018, increasing $6,938 from the comparable prior period. • Budgeted transfers out to other funds were $1,163,895 through April 2018, as compared to $1,104,913 through April 2017. Additionally, $700,000 of 2017 transfers from the General Fund were authorized by Council action and recorded in March 2017. • The General Fund exhibited an overall 16.5% increase in expenditures (not including transfers out) from $1,642,770 through 04/30/17, as compared to $1,914,448 through 04/30/18. Removing the effect of the police costs payment timing differences results in an overall 10.3% increase in General Fund expenditures. Financial or Budget Considerations: This report is intended to provide budget to actual and comparative financial information for the General Fund. Options: 1. Accept the monthly budget report. 2. Do not accept the monthly budget report. Recommendation / Action Requested: Staff recommends that the City Council accept the monthly budget report. Next Steps and Timeline: The General Fund budget report for May 2018 will be prepared and distributed in June 2018. Connection to Vision / Mission: The review of periodic reporting of financial information is a component of sound financial management. General Fund Revenues and Expenditures vs Budget Through April 3O, 2018 % Collected/ One Year Description Budget Period Amt YTD Budget % Expended Prior Actual General Fund Revenues Taxes Licenses & Permits Intergovernmental Charges for Service Fines & Forfeits Miscellaneous Revenues Total General Fund Revenues Other Financing Sources Transfers In Total Revenues and Other Financing Sources General Fund Expenditures General Government Council Personal Services Supplies Other Services and Charges Council Administration Personal Services Supplies Other Services and Charges Administration Elections Personal Services Supplies Other Services and Charges Elections Finance Personal Services Supplies Other Services and Charges Finance Professional Services Other Services and Charges Professional Services Planning Personal Services Supplies Other Services and Charges Planning 5,369,245 0 1,789,748 0.0% 0 245,155 113,247 81,718 46.2% 73,009 91,250 48,537 30,417 53.2% 43,434 53,885 22,182 17,962 41.2% 15,439 60,000 17,551 20,000 29.3% 18,402 215,000 121,751 71,667 56.6% 123,939 6,034,535 323,268 2,011,512 5.4% 274,223 25,000 25,000 8,333 100.0% 25,000 6,059,535 348,268 2,019,845 5.7% 299,223 22,600 7,392 7,533 32.7% 7,392 2,000 289 667 14.5% 512 59,500 11,554 19,833 19.4% 26,463 84,100 19,235 28,033 22.9% 34,367 382,474 131,115 127,491 34.3% 124,928 21,000 3,898 7,000 18.6% 6,820 43,550 20,135 14,517 46.2% 16,486 447,024 155,148 149,008 34.7% 148,234 14,700 0 4,900 0.0% 4,100 0 1,367 0.0% 21,975 0 7,325 0.0% 0 62,983 25,236 20,994 40.1% 38,905 15,600 7,849 5,200 50.3% 7,362 93,900 26,042 31,300 27.7% 2,396 172,483 59,127 57,494 34.3% 48,663 240,000 108,341 80,000 45.1% 82,952 240,000 108,341 80,000 45.1% 82,952 177,511 66,893 59,170 37.7% 94,832 450 538 150 119.6% 400 12,400 15,220 4,133 122.7% 5,832 190,361 82,651 63,454 43.4% 101,064 General Fund Revenues and Expenditures vs Budget Through April 3O, 2018 Fire Protection % Collected/ One Year Description Budget Period Amt YTD Budget % Expended Prior Actual Capital Outlay 271.955 135.977 90.652 50.0% 128.324 Municipal Buildings 625,953 325,962 208,651 52.1% 314,794 Supplies 22,000 2,860 7,333 13.0% 2,431 Other Services and Charges 185.600 99.778 61.867 53.8% 102.995 Municipal Buildings 207,600 102,638 69,200 49.4% 105,426 0 0 N/A 0 Total General Government 1,363,543 527,140 454,514 38.7% 520,706 Protective Inspections 144,263 51,539 48,088 Public Safety 44,691 Police Protection 2,220,146 1,000,097 740,049 45.0% 859,632 Supplies 0 0 0 N/A 0 Other Services and Charges 1,237,133 516,197 412,378 41.7% 393,243 Capital Outlay 212.797 106.399 70.932 50.0% 106.904 Police Protection 1.449.930 622.596 483.310 42.9% 500.147 Fire Protection Other Services and Charges 353,998 189,985 117,999 53.7% 186,470 Capital Outlay 271.955 135.977 90.652 50.0% 128.324 Fire Protection 625,953 325,962 208,651 52.1% 314,794 Park Maintenance 196,932 60,007 65,644 Protective Inspections 49,887 Personal Services 127,813 47,658 42,604 37.3% 40,317 Supplies 0 0 0 N/A 0 Other Services and Charges 16.450 3.881 5.483 23.6% 4.374 Protective Inspections 144,263 51,539 48,088 35.7% 44,691 Total Public Safety 2,220,146 1,000,097 740,049 45.0% 859,632 City Engineer Other Services and Charges 89.500 13.888 29.833 15.5% 13.140 City Engineer 89,500 13,888 29,833 15.5% 13,140 Public Works Service Personal Services 622,997 136,199 207,666 21.9% 100,631 Supplies 156,500 42,744 52,167 27.3% 17,135 Other Services and Charges 240.300 30.981 80.100 12.9% 31.939 Public Works Service 1.019.797 209.924 339.932 20.6% 149.705 Ice & Snow Removal Personal Services 73,930 60,114 24,643 81.3% 13,638 Supplies 40.000 24.110 13.333 60.3% 13.712 Ice & Snow Removal 113.930 84.224 37.977 73.9% 27.350 Total Public Works 1,223,227 308,036 407,742 25.2% 190,195 Parks and Recreation Park Maintenance Personal Services 128,432 51,161 42,811 39.8% 39,555 Supplies 23,500 626 7,833 2.7% 2,815 Other Services and Charges 45.000 8.220 15.000 18.3% 7.517 Park Maintenance 196,932 60,007 65,644 30.5% 49,887 General Fund Revenues and Expenditures vs Budget Through April 3O, 2018 % Collected/ One Year Description Budget Period Amt YTD Budget % Expended Prior Actual Recreation Personal Services Supplies Other Services and Charges Recreation Total Parks and Recreation Total General Fund Expenditures Other Financing Uses Transfers Out - Southshore Center - Building Transfers Out - Southshore Center - Operations Transfers Out - EDA Debt City Hall Transfers Out - Equipment Replacement Transfers Out - Street Improvements Transfers Out - Park Capital Total Other Financing Uses Total Expenditures and Other Financing Uses 44,289 12,994 14,763 29.3% 14,138 7,700 200 2,567 2.6% 1,736 13,900 5,974 4,633 43.0% 6,476 65,889 19,168 21,963 29.1% 22,350 262,821 79,175 87,607 30.1% 72,237 5,069,737 1,914,448 1,689,912 37.8% 1,642,770 38,000 38,000 12,667 100.0% 0 70,000 70,000 23,333 100.0% 95,000 93,895 93,895 31,298 100.0% 102,913 135,000 135,000 45,000 100.0% 120,000 785,000 785,000 261,667 100.0% 1,245,000 42,000 42,000 14,000 100.0% 242,000 1,163,895 1,163,895 387,965 100.0% 1,804,913 6,233,632 3,078,343 2,077,877 49.4% 3,447,683 General Fund, Net (174,097) (2,730,075) (58,032) 1568.1% (3,148,460) Cash and Investment Balances April 3O, 2018 4 Fund Balance Balance Fund Fund Tvne Number 1/1/2018 4/30/2018 Change General Fund General 101 4,026,373.80 1,416,943.01 (2,609,430.79) Southshore Center Special Revenue 201 133,892.76 121,150.58 (12,742.18) 2016A Public Safety Fire Facility Lease Revenue Refunding Bonds Debt Service 307 36,056.93 36,106.93 50.00 2016B Public Safety Police Facility Lease Revenue Refunding Bonds Debt Service 308 (1,203.83) (1,153.83) 50.00 2016C Public Safety Fire Facility Lease Revenue Refunding Bonds Debt Service 309 11,856.19 11,906.19 50.00 2017A Lease Revenue Refunding Bonds (Refunded 2008A) Debt Service 310 7,050.89 100,945.89 93,895.00 Park Capital Improvement Capital Projects 402 1,141,210.14 799,831.75 (341,378.39) Equipment Replacement Capital Projects 403 536,889.49 460,970.52 (75,918.97) Street Reconstruction Capital Projects 404 2,533,352.31 3,168,719.67 635,367.36 MSA Construction Capital Projects 405 129,801.43 129,801.43 0.00 Trail Construction Capital Projects 406 (759,597.26) (759,597.26) 0.00 Community Infrastructure Capital Projects 450 122,957.96 122,246.86 (711.10) TIF 2 Oppidan Senior Housing Capital Projects 470 146,982.74 (288.36) (147,271.10) Water Enterprise 601 943,702.60 1,171,009.04 227,306.44 Sewer Enterprise 611 2,626,385.64 2,645,870.22 19,484.58 Recycling Enterprise 621 231,732.09 253,492.25 21,760.16 Stormwater Management Enterprise 631 804,294.19 901,453.31 97,159.12 Payroll Clearing Fund Internal Use Only 700 0.00 23,598.13 23,598.13 Escrow Deposit Agency 880 273,556.00 248,804.00 (24,752.00) Unallocated Investment Income N/A N/A 0.00 (2,357.77) (2,357.77) Total 12,945,294.07 10,849,452.56 (2,095,841.51) 4