The URL can be used to link to this page

01-28-19 CC Reg Mtg Agenda PacketCITY OF SHOREWOOD CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MONDAY, JANUARY 28, 2019 AGENDA 1. CONVENE CITY COUNCIL MEETING A. Roll Call B. Review Agenda 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7:00 P.M. Mayor Zerby_ Johnson_ Labadie_ Siakel_ Sundberg_ Attachments 2. CONSENT AGENDA — Motion to approve items on the Consent Agenda & Adopt Resolutions Therein: A. City Council Work Session Minutes of January 14, 2019 Minutes B. City Council Regular Meeting Minutes of January 14, 2019 Minutes C. Approval of the Verified Claims List Claims List D. Minnetonka Community Education (MCE) Appointment City Administrator Memo Lake Minnetonka Communications Commission (LMCC) Appointment Resolution 19 -008 E. Regular Appointment of Joe Rigdon as Finance Director City Administrator Memo 3. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR (No Council Action will be taken) 4. PUBLIC HEARING A. Lawtonka Villas PUD Concept and Development Plan 5. REPORTS AND PRESENTATIONS 6. PARKS A. Report by Sue Davis on Arctic Fever Event Planning Director Memo Ordinance 562 Resolution 19 -014 Resolution 19 -015 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA — January 28, 2019 Page 2 7. PLANNING A. Report by Commissioner Sue Davis on the 12 -14 -18 Planning Commission Meeting 8. ENGINEERING /PUBLIC WORKS 9. GENERAL /NEW BUSINESS A. Proposed Excess Fund Balance purposes 10. STAFF AND COUNCIL REPORTS A. Administrator and Staff 1. Investments 4th Quarter 2018 Report 2. SeeClickFix 2018 Review B. Mayor and City Council 11. ADJOURN Draft Minutes Finance Director Memo Finance Director Memo Communications Coordinator Memo 2A CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION MEETING COUNCIL CHAMBERS MONDAY, JANUARY 14, 2019 5:30 P.M. MINUTES 1. CONVENE CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION MEETING Mayor Zerby called the meeting to order at 5:30 P.M. A. Roll Call Present. Mayor Zerby; Councilmembers Labadie, Siakel, Sundberg and Johnson (arrived at 5:45 P.M.); City Attorney Keane; City Administrator Lerud; City Clerk Thone; Planning Director Darling; Director of Public Works Brown; ,and, City Engineer Fauske Absent: None Others Present: Andy Brotzler, Bill Alms, B. Review Agenda Sundberg moved, Labadie seconded, 4/0. 2. GRANT City Engineer Fauske state of the drainage study for, information provided by t information. She introduce questions the Council ma Minnehalia Creek Watersh and some of the prelimina ry about the history of past fl o formerly a` fifteen -inch pipe project. She noted that it h properly would be a twenty conducted that caused,sed N inger, Nate Onken nted. Motion passed d that at the September'24, 2018 Work Session there was discussion the area: She noted that the study has been updated based on he residents as well as some additional field work to confirm the d Bill. Alms and Andy Brotzler from WSB, who can answer technical y have: She stated that there was a meeting last week with the ed District to keep them informed on the drainage issues in the area ideas being discussed to address them. She gave some information oding in the area. She noted that one of the storm sewer pipes was and was replaced with a twelve -inch pipe as part of the watermain as been determined that the appropriate size pipe for this area to drain =one -inch storm pipe. She gave some history of a watermain flush that iment to fill in the ditch in the area and caused problems in the area. Nate Onken, 5925 Grant Street, stated that he watched the City of Excelsior conduct the watermain flush and saw the large sink hole it created that caused all of the dirt and debris to drain down and filled up the ditch. Carolyn Allmendinger, 5915 Grant Street, introduced herself and noted that they had moved into their home in February of 2014. City Engineer Fauske noted that the storm sewer that was installed with the watermain extension was installed to match the ground elevation which means the pipe was raised up. She noted that CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES JANUARY 14, 2019 Page 2 of 5 there is also a storm sewer pipe between the yards of 5915 and 5925 that transitions from eight inches to twelve inches. She stated that the Public Works Department jetted water through the storm sewer to make sure it was clear because there was some sort of obstruction in the pipe. Councilmember Johnson arrived at the meeting. City Engineer Fauske stated that the design of this area was based on the elevation, however they were not aware of change in the elevation with the ditch being filled in with material from the watermain flushing. Mr. Onken stated that there are catch basins at all four corners of the intersection but the water does not drain into any of them, and instead goes into the nearby yards and then drains into the pipes. Mayor Zerby expressed his frustration that the City spent a lot of money on this project with the idea that it would improve things and not make it worse. Councilmember Sundberg stated that this should have been included in the design process. 'Mr. Alms stated that as part of a project, there are some things that are design related and either things that fall under an "in kind" replacement and there was the mistaken assumption that a twelve -inch pipe was simply being replaced in kind. Mayor Zerby stated that he does not think the City has ever taken the approach of just putting back what was already there, but instead tries to look at the area and see how the problems can be addressed, similar to what was recently done along Riviera Lane. He stated that if he paid someone to fix his leaky roof and after they°fied the roof, it actually leaked more, he would be very upset with the vendor. Councilmember Siakel asked Ms. Allmendinger and Mr. Onken if they had had any issues with flooding in their homes or if it was a yard and driveway issue causing them concern. Mr. Onken explained that he has refused to make any improvements in his basement until something is done to improve the situation because it has just gotten systematically worse as time goes on. He stated that his yard is always wet and muddy. Ms. Allmendinger distributed pictures of the flooding in the area. She stated that since they moved in, they have installed a sump pump. She stated that she cannot quantify the stress she feels when she sees the radar or hears rain in the forecast. She explained that she also is afraid to take 'a trip in May because she does not know what she would do if it rained while she was gone. Mayor Zerby stated that there are four proposals included in the packet to fix the issue that range from about $90,000 to $300,000 on top of the money spent to do the project the first time. He noted that the least expensive option still includes a fifteen -inch storm sewer pipe. City Engineer Fauske stated that she would like the Council to give direction on which option they would like to proceed with and then the other conversations can be had about how it is paid for. Mayor Zerby stated that he thinks it should be the other way around and he would like to know what WSB is willing to do to help resolve the situation. Councilmember Siakel stated that something needs to be done and a decision needs to be made. Councilmember Sundberg stated that she agrees that it needs to be done correctly but it still comes back to responsibility. She stated that she does not think that the City of Excelsior should be contacted until that answer has been answered. CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES JANUARY 14, 2019 Page 3 of 5 Mayor Zerby stated that he is not in favor of any of the options that remove homes. He stated that option number five is very expensive, so he is somewhere between option number one and option number four. He stated that he would like to know how this is going to be paid for and is not looking at the City funding the entire project. Councilmember Labadie stated that she agrees with the comments by the Mayor and other Councilmembers. She agrees that putting in a pipe that is any less than a twenty- one -inch pipe should not be done since that is what the professionals are recommending. She stated that she does not understand why an option for a fifteen- inch pipe was even included. Councilmember Sundberg asked if City Attorney Keane could give a legal opinion on this situation. City Administrator Lerud stated that the City Attorney Keane can provide a legal opinion at a future meeting. Councilmember Labadie stated that she feels time is of the essence here and agrees that getting direction from legal counsel is a good idea. Mayor Zerby asked if Public Works Director Brown had spoken with the public works department from the City of Excelsior. Public Works Director Brown stated that he had not spoken with them yet. City Engineer Fauske noted that they have lied some preliminary conversations with the city engineer for Excelsior. Mr. Alms explained that the fifteen -inch pipe option was presented because that would basically restore the area to the pre - watermain project condition and not trigger having to deal with MnDot, Excelsior and the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. Councilmember Labadie asked about Mr. Alms use of the word "trigger" in relation to MnDot and the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. She stated that the City is not trying to do this in secret but is trying to fix the problem.` She asked what triggering those agencies meant to the project and if it means the City could not proceed. Mr. Alms explained that triggering those agencies could mean that they will not issue a permit, but it is more likely that'd will extend the timeframe by several months for when improvements can be made and will require;a more detailed look downstream. Mayor Zerby stated that he appreciates the explanation of what has changed in this area but he does not think the question has been answered of how we will fix this. He explained that he meant "we" in a sense of WSB and the City together. He stated that he would like to see Excelsior assist the City in cleaning out the channel since they helped it fill in. Councilmember Siakel stated that she feels there are too many options to consider and would like a recommendation of the best solution. 3. REFUSE HAULING COLLECTION SURVEY City Administrator Lerud explained the investigation process of organized refuse hauling. He introduced Peter Leatherman who is here to talk about the timeline and methodology for the survey. Mr. Leatherman gave an overview of their methodology and noted that they are somewhat old fashioned because they conduct phone surveys on both landlines and cell phones. He explained the process for getting a representative sample of residents. He stated that they have proposed CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES JANUARY 14, 2019 Page 4 of 5 a sample number of four hundred. He noted that he has surveyed on this issue for about twenty years. Councilmember Sundberg asked if Mr. Leatherman could share some of the questions that have been asked in other communities that have also looked at organized refuse collection. Mr. Leatherman stated that after he gets a feel for what the City is looking at, he will use similar wording so the results can be compared in an apples -to- apples comparison which will help the City understand the data better. Councilmember Sundberg asked how long a typical phone interview'for the survey lasts. Mr. Leatherman stated that it depends on the resident but noted that with a twenty - question survey it will average about five or six minutes per call. Councilmember Siakel asked how the numbers they call are selected. Mr. Leatherman stated that for the landlines they do random number dialing and for cell phone numbers, they purchase a list. He explained the process of getting in touch with people on the phone. Mayor Zerby noted that the City shares a zip code with Excelsior, so many people may be confused about which city they actually live in. Councilmember Siakel stated that there are people that are absolutely loyal to their trash hauler and want to keep them and on the other side there are residents who feel strongly about recycling and organics which expands the services that are currently offered. She stated that the Council has ended up feeling caught in the middle and not sure if anything should be changed. City Administrator Lerud explained that the curl stated that one of the licensed haulers handles Johnson noted that recycling is picked up evei people would like it to be picked up every week. it system i open to four different haulers. He )cycling throughout the City. Councilmember other week and he has gotten feedback that City Administrator Lerud noted that organic pick up is offered on a voluntary basis through one of the haulers. Council member.Siakel noted that the City had received a grant from the County in order to offer organic pick up, so there is some County involvement to help cover some of the costs: Mr. Leath ermanuggested that perhaps there should be a question that asks if people are interested in organics and if they are willing to pay a little extra in order to have it. Councilmember Labadie stated that there has been a packed house during the times where this has been discussed even when it has not officially been on the agenda. She stated that many of the older residents are not aware that if you have disability, all of the trash haulers will offer services above and beyond for people who may have difficulty getting their cans to the curb. She would like to see some sort of question that asks about that and gets the information out there. Councilmember Sundberg stated that she feels the survey can really serve to educate residents as well. Mr. Leatherman stated that this is public opinion research and he recommends both a pre -test and a post -test information gathering method to gauge what their initial opinion is and then see if that changes based on the information given. Councilmember Siakel asked if there could be a question on what residents are currently paying. She stated that she thinks there is the perception that everyone is getting the best deal. She CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES JANUARY 14, 2019 Page 5 of 5 stated that when there have been discussions there is a large range in what people are actually paying. Mayor Zerby suggested finding out information such as whether people think there should be more or less haulers, if operation hours should be changed, if they like single day collection, and about what type of service they are getting. He stated that there have also been discussions about a fall clean up day and a spring clean up day for curbside pick up rather than having to bring it in with the cost spread equally to the entire City. Councilmember Johnson stated that he would definitely like to have questions that probe the level of service provided. He stated that he has heard many people say that they share their garage codes with their haulers which surprised him that people are that trusting. Councilmember Sundberg stated that she would be inte environmentalists or not. Mr. Leatherman stated that t questions in the first draft he submits to the Council. Councilmember Sundberg asked how long the full on the questions. Mr. Leatherman stated that the su and will involve seven to ten business days of pho City by the end of next week. 4. ADJOURN Johnson moved, Siakel seconded, Adjourning tl d'in finding out if people identify as will probabl,be more than twenty process will take once the City decides rocess typically takes two to four weeks He plans to have a draft survey to the Work Session Meeting of Scott Zerby, Mayor CITY OF SHOREWOOD CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MONDAY, JANUARY 14, 2019 MINUTES 1. CONVENE CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING Mayor Zerby called the meeting to order at 7:01 P.M. Oaths of Office: Jennifer Labadie, Councilmember Debbie Siakel, Councilmember City Administrator Lerud administered the Oath of Present. Absent: Mayor Zerby; Councilmembers Johns Attorney Keane; City Administrator L Rigdon; Planning Director Darling; Di Engineer Fauske Labadie moved, 5/0. Cou Planning Directoi agreement in item Councilmember J and Randy's Sani 2B 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7:00 P.M. the two re -el cilmembers. lie, Siakel, and Sundberg; City Clerk Thone; Finance Director Public Works Brown; and, City the agenda as presented. Motion passed the Consent Agenda. Nhether any other entities had applied for item G. that no other applications had come in for the concession xpressed his appreciation for American Legion, Clarence Clofer Post their contributions to Arctic Fever. The Council unanimously approved the consent agenda adopting the resolutions therein. A. City Council Regular Meeting Minutes of December 10, 2018 B. Approval of the Verified Claims List C. Accept 2019 Artic Fever Donations RESOLUTION NO. 19 -001, "A Resolution Accepting Donations to the City of Shorewood 2019 Arctic Fever Event." CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES JANUARY 14, 2019 Page 2 of 14 D. Setting the 2019 City Council Regular Meeting Schedule, RESOLUTION NO. 19 -002, "A Resolution Setting the 2019 Regular City Council Meeting Schedule for the City of Shorewood." E. Council Out -of -State Travel Policy Annual Review F. Approve Change Order No. 3 for Riviera Lane, Shorewood Lane, and Mann Lane, Street and Utility Project and Watermain Extension along Yellowstone Trail (Club Valley Road to Riviera Lane), Riviera Lane, State Highway 9 (Riviera Lane to Lake Linden Drive) and Lake Linden Drive (State Highway 7 to 6140 Lake Linden Drive), City Project 17 -04, RESOLUTION NO. 19 -003, "A Resolution Approving Change Order No. 346r the Riviera Lane, Shorewood Lane, and Mann Lane Street and Utility =Improvements Project, and the Watermain Extension Along Yellowstone Trail (Club Valley Road to Riviera Lane), Riviera Lane, State Highway 7 (Riviera Lane to Lake Linden Drive) and Lake Linden Drive (State Highway 7 to 6140 Lake Linden Drive)" G. H. I. J. K. L. Approval of Freeman Park Co Authorize Purchase 004, "A Resolution I Approve Color Choice City 19C cer Goal for ,A ing Purchase' lay Surface at Annual Upda Master Fee S Mileaae'Rate Reimbursement Legal or Park, RESOLUTION NO. 19- 3occer Goal." Park "A iture for Public Works Equipment, Plow, Lights and Authorize Expenditure for Public Works Equipment, One Ton Truck O. 2018 Inflow and Infiltration Abatement Project, City Project 18 -12; Accept Bids and Award Contract, RESOLUTION NO. 19 -006, "A Resolution Accepting the Bids and Awarding the Contract for the 2018 Inflow and Infiltration Abatement Project, City Project 18 -12." P. Approve Change Order No. 2 for Boulder Bridge Well Re- siding Project, City Project 18 -01, RESOLUTION NO. 19 -007, "A Resolution Approving Change Order Two for the Boulder Bridge Re- siding Project, City Project 18 -01." Consent Agenda approved by unanimous approval, 5/0. CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES JANUARY 14, 2019 Page 3 of 14 3. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR Sue Davis, 5495 Valleywood Circle, said she was here on behalf of Arctic Fever. She stated that because there is no snow on the ground, they have been working on changing the planned games and activities so there will still be fun things for children and families to do at the event. She gave an overview of the schedule for the events starting on Thursday evening. She reminded people that all of the details are available at www.arcticfever.net. Chet Ritchie, 24995 Glen Road, expressed his support for the planned changes to Glen Road. He stated that he believes the petition that was handed around contained misinformation about the proposed project. He urged the Council to look at the information that was distributed along with the petition. He stated that there are people along Glen Road that support the project. David Hansen, 24925 Glen Road, stated that he would like to second the comments made by Mr. Ritchie that there has been misinformation spread throughout the neighborhood. He explained that he is strongly in favor of the road, curb and gutter and water. Wally Piroyan, 24845 Glen Road, stated that he is willing to go over the information that has been distributed regarding the petition line for line to address their concerns and perceived falsehoods. He stated that he feels the facts are without dispute. Richard Eng, 25170 Glen Road, stated that he agrees with Mr. Piroyan that everything that they have put out regarding this project is true and he will stand behind it. He stated that he felt the open house that the City held was completely useless. 4. PUBLIC HEARING A. Lawtonka Villas POD ' Concept and Development Plan Request to Open and Continue the Public Hearing Planning Director Darling explained that the application is for a PUD plan and minor subdivision to construct two single - family homes. She noted that the Planning Commission reviewed the plans at the December 10, 2018 meeting and at the time, staff had recommended approval with a number of conditions attached. She stated that in an effort to reduce some of the conditions, the applicant has submitted additional information but staff has not had time to thoroughly review the new information. She stated that staff is asking for a continuation to allow time to review the revisions that were submitted. Mayor Zerby opened the public hearing at 7:16 p.m. There being no public comment, Mayor Zerby closed the public hearing. Sundberg moved, Labad`re seconded, Approving the Continuation of the Public Hearing for Lawtonka Villas PUD Concept and Development Plan Request. Motion carried 5/0. 5. REPORTS AND PRESENTATIONS A. Representative Kelly Morrison Representative Kelly Morrison explained that she is the new State Representative for 33B. She noted that she will serve on the Health and Human Services Committee, a subcommittee on water, Environmental and Natural Resources Committee, and the Early Childhood Development CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES JANUARY 14, 2019 Page 4 of 14 Committee. She noted that she hopes to periodically attend Council meetings in the future and encouraged residents and Council to contact her whenever they needed to. B. 2018 Mosquito Management Control District Report Administrator Lerud noted that the activity summary for the City in 2018 was included in the packet for informational purposes. 6. PARKS A. Report by Commissioner Mangold on 12 -11 -18 Park Commission Meeting Mayor Zerby noted that Commissioner Mangold was unable to attend tonight's meeting, but the items are summarized on the agenda item. B. Accept Proposal for Manor Park Pon Public Works Director Brown gave an overview of recen condition of Manor Park Pond. He stated that staff has,: to conduct a study to determine the phosphorus load approval and noted that if the ice remains safe, they car weather warms up and they are unable to safely go on the spring. Councilmember Labadie asked if the clim the test results. Public Works Director B bearing on the test results. Mayor Zerby stated that he feels this is a Pond. ment discussions with residents regarding the Elicited a proposal from Barr Engineering ig in the pond. Staff is recommending do some of the testing this winter. If the the ice, they will conduct the testing in aples are taken effect any of mate or time of year have no step in addressing the issue at Manor Park Siakel moved, Labadie seconded, to Approve the Proposal from Barr Engineering for Investigation and Study of the Manor Park Pond, in an Amount Not to Exceed $13,600. Motion.. carried 5/0. Mayor Zerby noted that he recently read that seven cities in the State are suing the manufacturer of the driveway sealer because of its contaminants. He listed the cities that have filed the lawsuit and asked whether the City should join this suit. City Attorney Keane stated that he will make inquiries to see if there are benefits to participating and report back to the Council. Councilmember Johnsen asked if Public Works Director Brown was aware of any other ponds within the City that may be considered contaminated. Public Works Director Brown stated that most metro communities are finding that virtually all of their ponds are impacted. C. Alcohol and Food Trucks at Special Events Planning Director Darling stated that during the outdoor special events, the City is frequently approached by residents asking why there is not food or alcohol available. She noted that the Parks Commission discussed it at the December 11, 2018 meeting and made a unanimous recommendation that they are willing to allow food trucks at special events and a split vote of 4/1 CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES JANUARY 14, 2019 Page 5 of 14 on whether to consider allowing alcohol at special events. She stated that staff is looking for direction from the Council on whether to proceed to study these issues. Councilmember Sundberg stated that in her opinion, it seems reasonable to allow both food and alcohol for one year and if there are problems, then the City can just shut it down. Councilmember Labadie stated that she has no problem with food trucks being allowed in the City parks, but stated that she would never vote to allow alcohol to be served in the City parks. Councilmember Siakel stated that she also does not see any reason to allow alcohol in the parks. Mayor Zerby stated that he has been approached by various non- profit agencies that are interested in selling alcohol at events for fundraising. He stated that he does not support generally opening up the parks to alcohol, but would support allowing it for special events at specific parks. Sundberg moved, Johnson seconded, to direct staff to draft an ordinance that will allow food trucks in the City parks for special events. Motion carried 5/0: Zerby moved, Sundberg seconded, to direct staff to draft an ordinance that will allow alcohol for special events upon Council approval in Badger Park for a one -year, trial period. Motion carried 3/2 ( Labadie and Siakef), Councilmember Labadie requested that when the Council reviews this in one year that Chief Meehan be invited to the meeting to provide feedback regarding alcohol related law enforcement issues with any alcohol sales that have occurred in Badger Park. D. Badger Park Design for Picnic Shelter Planning Director Darling stated that the Parks Corrmmissiori has recommended a design for the picnic shelter with a split gable roof line. She noted that the shelter will be large enough to accommodate six picnic tables. She reviewed the layout of the shelter and the restroom building and noted that the restroom design that will be similar to the picnic shelter. 7. PLANNING Pool Setbacks at 6035 Spruce Hill Court for Sally and Tim Butler Planning Director Darling gave an overview of past discussions by the Planning Commission and the Council regarding the variances to pool setbacks at 6035 Spruce Hill Court. She stated that the Planning Commission had recommended denial of the request. She noted that this item had been discussed at the December 10, 2018 Council meeting where it was continued to allow the applicant time to inquire about purchasing additional land to the north. She stated that Lennar, who owns the land to the north has indicated that they are not able to sell a portion of the property, but have no objection to the variance for the pool on the property. She stated that she has written up resolutions for both approval and denial based on the Council's previous discussion. She reviewed the recommended conditions if the Council chooses to approve the variance. Tim Butler, 6035 Spruce Hill Court, asked if the Council had a chance to review the twenty -five- page presentation that he had prepared for the meeting. He read aloud a letter from his wife explaining their request for a variance in order to have a pool at their home. He stated that the decision by the Planning Commission to deny the variance was before there was knowledge that the seventy -foot easement behind their property is a non - conservation drainage and utility easement. He stated that they also did not know that Lennar would not sell the property to them. CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES JANUARY 14, 2019 Page 6 of 14 He stated that they do not agree with the recommendation by the Planning Commission to deny the variance nor do they agree with the third condition if the Council approves the request, for a three - foot -wide patio space. He explained their reasons for not agreeing with the Planning Commission recommendation. He reviewed the language from the League of Minnesota Cities regarding practical difficulties and reasonable use. He stated that the proposed three -foot patio space is not reasonable and noted that they plan to only increase the impervious surface from 14.6 percent to 20.45 percent. Councilmember Sundberg asked if the adjoining neighbors were all in support of the variance. Mr. Butler stated that he has letters from all of them expressing their support. Mayor Zerby noted that the new information is that Lennar is also in support of the variance. Luann Ahart 6090 Spruce Hill Court, stated her support of both the variance for the pool and the patio. Councilmember Labadie stated that even though the neighbors support the variance request, this is not a small variance request. Sally Butler, 6035 Spruce Hill Court, expressed her frustration with this process because the point of a variance is to ask for an exception to the rule, which is what they are doing. She stated that they have the complete support of their neighbors. She stated that they are simply asking for an exception to put their pool in a location where nobody will see it. Councilmember Sundberg stated that she was just about to'ask the same question because she thought variances were exceptions to the rules and do not set precedents. Planning Director Darling agreed that this was correct. Councilmember Sundberg stated that based on that information, she feels the Council should consider granting the variance and factor in all the information. She stated that because all of the neighbors, including Lennar Homes approves of the request and there is a pretty significant buffer with the trees, she explained that she is inclined to approve the request. Mayor Zerby confirmed that the dense tree coverage to the north was on Lennar Homes property. He asked if there was anything that would prevent them from cutting the trees down. Planning Director Darling replied no but noted that this was in a drainage easement so it is unlikely the trees will be removed, since a structure cannot be placed in this area. Councilmember Labadie stated that she puts a lot of faith in the findings of the Planning Commission and their recommendation was unanimous to deny the request. She stated that staff had also recommended denial of the request. Councilmember Siakel stated that her understanding of a variance is that there needs to be a demonstration of a hardship and to her, being unable to put in a pool is not a hardship. She stated that she feels this is a bit about setting a precedent. Mr. Butler read a portion of a memo from the League of Minnesota Cities dated May 2, 2018 titled Land Use Ordinance Mistakes that calls for "practical difficulties ", not "undue hardship" and explained that hardship is no longer the test of whether to grant a variance or not. He stated that he believes that the City is misapplying the standard and he is asking that they apply it according CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES JANUARY 14, 2019 Page 7 of 14 to the League of Minnesota Cities standards and State laws. Councilmember Siakel asked for City Attorney to Keane to weigh in with his opinion. City Attorney Keane stated that the test that the City applies to variance requests is highly subjective and there is latitude and discretion in determining the reasonableness of the use as well as the reasonableness of departure from the standard. Mr. Butler noted that the Planning Commission has stated that the use of a pool is a reasonable use of the property. Councilmember Johnson asked whether the Planning Commission was aware of the seventy -foot drainage and utility easement directly behind the property. Planning Director Darling stated that the Planning Commission did not know that there was a drainage and utility easement behind the property. Councilmember Johnson stated that, in his opinion, that piece of information is a pretty big deal and suggested that perhaps it should go back to the Planning,Commission. Mayor Zerby noted that he feels it is in the Council's court now and should move forward. He stated that he is in favor of approving the variance because of the easement, the support of the neighbors, and the letter from Ms. Butler that included the setback information. from other cities. Councilmember Labadie stated that she agrees with Councilmember Johnson that the fact that the Planning Commission was not aware of the drainage and utility easement behind the property is huge. Mayor Zerby noted that the Planning Commission also did not know that the Lennar Homes was in support of it because they will eventually have to sell the lot behind the Butlers. Councilmember Labadie agrees that the Council should deal with this request tonight and not kick it back to the Planning Commission. Sundberg moved, Zerby seconded to approve the Variance Requests to Pool Setbacks at 6035 Spruce Hill Court for Sally and Tim Butler subject to the conditions in the staff report. Aaron Lutz, explained that he lives in Tonka Bay and is the pool contractor working with the applicants. He noted that the' Butlers would like to have an automatic pool cover which needs more than three feet of,patio cover for this to be secure and if they decide to put in a diving board, that will also need to be mounted in more than three feet of concrete. He stated that the minimum would be about four feet to have the automatic cover box secure. He stated that on the north side, the concrete could be brought down to three feet. Councilmember. Labadie stated that she agreed that a pool cover is a safety issue, but does not think a diving board falls into that category. Councilmember Johnson stated that he believes the width of the walking surface next to the pool can also cause a safety issue if it is too narrow. Mr. Lutz explained that both Edina and Minneapolis require a minimum of four feet of concrete around pools for safety purposes. Councilmember Labadie asked why both staff and the Planning Commission had recommended thirty -six inches. Planning Director Darling explained that thirty - six inches is the minimum requirement in the building code for safe egress and was recommended to minimize the variance. She noted that staff was not aware of the pool cover issue at the time of the request. CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES JANUARY 14, 2019 Page 8 of 14 Councilmember Siakel thanked the Butlers for coming into the City with all the information. She stated that she understands that they have put in an incredible amount of work gathering information, however, she will stick with the Planning Commission recommendation. Councilmember Labadie confirmed that the thirty- six -inch recommendation came from staff and asked if that opinion would change based on the information provided tonight by Mr. Lutz. Planning Director Darling stated that she did not have enough information on pool cover requirements to make a recommendation. Sundberg amended her motion, Zerby amended his second, to recommend that there be a minimum of four feet of concrete along the north side of the pool. Councilmember Sundberg stated that she does not like going against Planning Commission recommendations but has questioned some of their recommendations with regard to variance requests. Councilmember Johnson stated that he was pi Planning Commission meeting which is why he 'y foot drainage and utility easement behind the recommendation to the Council. Councilmember Labadie stated that shE and the fact that there is a seventy -foot c pieces of information that the Planning recommendation. Motion failed 2/3 (Jo Siakel moved, to Dei 6035 Spruce Hill Cou Planning Director Darl twenty -day review pe additional time to sen additional information. , and the Variance Reque: Motion died for the ,sent for the very thorough discussion at the )uld like to know if knowing about the seventy - property would make any difference in their letter from the developer in support of the pool nd utility easement behind the property are key ion did not have when they made their initial Pool Setbacks by Tim and Sally Butler at of a second. ng reminded the Council that this request is at the end of the one - hundred iod. She noted that the Council could request that the applicant grant J it back to the Planning Commission to reconsider the request with the City Attorney Keane confirmed that the Council would ask the applicant to waive the one - hundred twenty -day review period. Planning Director Darling stated that she could take this item back to the Planning Commission for the February 5, 2019 meeting and back to the Council on the February 11, 2019 meeting. Mayor Zerby asked the applicants if they are willing to allow a forty - five -day extension to allow the Planning Commission to discuss it with the new information. Mr. Butler stated that they are willing to grant the extension but he is unable to attend any of the meetings in February because he will be out of town. He stated that if the Council would like additional time, he is willing to grant a sixty -day extension and then he would be able to attend the meetings in March. Planning Director Darling asked Mr. Butler to sign a statement that they are granting the City the sixty -day extension before they leave this evening. She noted that the Planning Commission will meet on March 5, 2019 and the Council will meet on March 11, 2019. CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES JANUARY 14, 2019 Page 9 of 14 Mayor Zerby clarified that this item would be brought back to the Planning Commission in March in order for them to consider the request in light of the letter from Lennar Homes in support of the pool location, the seventy -foot drainage and utility easement behind the property, and the pool cover safety requirements. 8. ENGINEERING /PUBLIC WORKS A. Receive Feasibility Report and Authorize Preparation of Plans and Specifications for the Enchanted Island and Shady Island Street Reclamation Project (Except Enchanted Island), City Project 1841 City Engineer Fauske gave an overview of the scope of the work for the reclamation project for Enchanted Island and Shady Island. Staff is requesting that Council receive the feasibility report and authorize for plans and specifications. She noted that ttaff would like to hold a separate public hearing on the Enchanted Point project which will be covered in the next agenda item. Mayor Zerby asked about City responsibility in 1 that the City policy is to assess the improvemer maintenance costs with both gravel and paved the assessment policy if they choose to. Mayor Zerby confirmed that if the City does nc gravel. Siakel moved, Labadie seconded, Adop Receiving Feasibility Report and Authora the Enchanted Island and ' Shady , Island Point), City Project 1 -11." Motion passed B. Calling for H Island Street m ie assessment. City Engineer Fauske explained t cast for paving. She stated that the City incurs -oads. She stated that the Council could adjust ove forward with paving then the road will remain ing RESOLUTION NO. 19 -009, "A Resolution ng Preparation of Plans and Specifications for Rreet Reclamation Project (Except Enchanted t for the Enchanted Island and Shady ty Project 18 -11, Enchanted Island Point City Engineer Fauske explained that in order to be consistent with the City's assessment policy, a public hearing would be held for the properties included within the proposed assessment area. She noted that the estimated assessment amount is $13,620 per unit. Johnson moved, Labadie seconded, Adopting RESOLUTION NO. 19 -010 "A Resolution Calling for Public Hearing for the Enchanted Island and Shady Island Street Reclamation Project, City Project 18 -11, Enchanted Point Improvements." Motion passed 5/0. Mayor Zerby noted that'he appreciated the pictures of the coring samples that were included in the packet. 9. GENERAL /NEW BUSINESS A. Fund Balance Policy Update Finance Director Rigdon stated that this Fund Balance Policy is essentially a combination of the Fund Balance Policy from 2007 and the GASB 54 Policy from 2012. He explained some of the CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES JANUARY 14, 2019 Page 10 of 14 different fund requirements and noted that if the City had any revenue funds such as those from the Shorewood Community and Event Center, it requires a resolution committing the resources for those funds. He stated that this was not been done most likely because when it was originated there was a negative fund balance for that item, so this has slipped through the cracks. He explained that the proposed policy states that the City's goal will be to maintain an end -of -year unassigned fund balance of an amount not less then 60% of the next year's budgeted expenditures for the General Fund. Sundberg moved, Siakel seconded, Adopting the Fund Balance Policy as presented. Motion passed 4/0/1 (Johnson) Sundberg moved, Labadie seconded, Adopting RESOLUTION NO. 19 -011, "A Resolution Committing Specific Revenue Sources in Special Revenue Funds." Motion passed 4/0/1 (Johnson). B. Electronic Fund Transfer Policy Finance Director Rigdon noted that this policy has been recommended to the City by the external auditors to improve documentations and internal controls over this process. He noted that there is also a new form created for this policy in order to ensure,proper authorities approve the transfer Siakel moved, Labadie seconded, Adopting the Electronic Fund Transfer Policy as presented. Motion passed 4/0/1 (Johnson).',, C. Annual Appointments and Designations for 2019 Mayor Zerby noted that the City will need to find 6-new Assistant Weed Inspector. Councilmember Siakel asked if someone else was interested in serving on the Fire District Board because she has some conflicts with two of the four meeting dates, but noted that she is happy to stay on as an alternate: She' noted that she feels it is important to have solid representation at the Fire Board meetings because there appears to be a lot of important issues coming up this year. Councilmember Labadie stated that she is interested in attending but does not know the scheduled Board meeting dates in order to check her calendar. Councilmember Siakel stated that the meetings are currently scheduled for January 23, March 27, September 25, and November 20-'2019. She explained that she will be unable to attend the January and November meetings. Councilmember Labadie stated that she is willing to serve on the Fire Board. Mayor Zerby suggested that Councilmember Johnson take over the alternate position from Councilmember Labadie for the Coordinating Committee for the South Lake Minnetonka Police Department. He noted that he was okay with the rest of the appointments. He noted that he would like to see City Prosecutor Potts in front of the Council at some point to have a discussion with him. Councilmember Siakel stated that she believes the Park and Planning Commission positions should be flipped and thinks it is good for the appointments to rotate. Councilmember Labadie stated that she can serve on either the Parks Commission or the Planning Commission from January through June. Councilmember Siakel offered to serve on the Planning Commission from CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES JANUARY 14, 2019 Page 11 of 14 July through December. Councilmember Labadie stated that then she will serve on the Planning Commission from January through June. Councilmember Johnson noted that he will serve on the Parks Commission from July through December. Councilmember Sundberg stated that she will serve on the Parks Commission from January through June. Councilmember Johnson noted that he believes the name of the official publications where notices may be published is incorrect and should be Lakeshore Weekly. Public Works Director Brown recommended that Scott Sch Inspector. Siakel moved, Labadie seconded, Approving discussion and Adopting RESOLUTION NO. ' Annual Appointments to Certain Offices and P Motion passed 5/0. D. Creating a Recycling Advisory City Administrator Lerud stated that reside of working with the City to help increase 1 thought of with the term recycling. He e Master Recycler certification from Henri included Mr. Shneider, Mayor Zerby, Cor issue. He noted that they are ultimately as the Assistant Weed apointments based on Council "A Resolution Designated 2019 Within the Citv.,of Shorewood." Joe Shneider contacted the City about the possibility going to a landfill or to a burner: He explained th' and noted that he wants to clarify that this discu garbage collection. 'He stated that there have a interest in working on this issue but does not ha that if the Council supports this, he will bring it Recycling Advisory Group. s recycling effort and to broaden what is usually 1 that Mr. Schneider had recently received his unty, He stated that a meeting was held that itions Director Moore and himself to discuss the to reduce the amount of material that is either at they had put together some broad parameters ssion is completely separate from the organized Iready been some people who have expressed ve their names at tonight's meeting. He stated back 'to a future agenda with the names for the Mayor Zerby noted that he felt it was a really good initial meeting and Mr. Shneider presented some great initial ideas such as putting containers for bottle recycling at convenience stores and some ideas on construction site waste because much of that goes to the landfill. The Council expressed their support of the Recycling Advisory Group. Councilmembers Sundberg and'Siakel expressed interest in serving on the advisory group. E. Right -of -Way Registration Fee City Administrator Lerud explained that in February of last year, the Council adopted an updated right -of -way ordinance that included a fee schedule. He stated that CenturyLink has complained to staff that the annual fee of $2,000 for non - franchise utilities is out of the norm of what other cities charge for these types of registration fees. He stated that they have been unable to resolve the situation with CenturyLink however, as some companies have paid the $2,000. He stated that staff had contacted a few other cities and the City's fee is quite different than other cities. He noted that staff believes the fees need to balance the cost of the right -of -way program but should CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES JANUARY 14, 2019 Page 12 of 14 not be too far out in front of what other cities are charging. He explained that staff is recommended that the fee be lowered to $400. Sundberg moved, Siakel seconded, to Reduce the Right -of -Way Registration Fee to $400. Motion passed 5/0. Councilmember Johnson asked if the City would refund the companies that paid the full $2,000. City Administrator Lerud noted that those companies would be given a credit. Mayor Zerby recessed the meeting at 8:59 p.m. and reconvened at 9:03 p.m. 10. STAFF AND COUNCIL REPORTS A. Administrator and Staff 1. Update on Street Light at Ferncroft Drive and Minnetonka Boulevard Planning Director Darling stated that at the December 10, 2018 Council meeting, the Council had approved Excel placing a light pole at the corner of this intersection. She stated that the Council had also asked if Excel would put a timer on the light so it could be turned off by 10:00 p.m. She spoke with Excel and they stated that they do not use timers but will use photosensors. She noted that Excel had also stated that they Will be working an design during January and February and would plan installation when road restrictiorts are lifted. 2. Monthly Budget Finance Director Rigdon noted that the monthly' budget report is from November because there was not a second Council' meeting ire the month of December. He gave a brief overview of the information and noted that there is an excess amount in revenues which is primarily due to building permits. He noted that expenditures are slightly underbudget and there will be about $280,000 in excess of revenue over expenditures. Other Public Works Director Brown stated Mayor Zerby had asked about No Passing signs on County Road 18 and noted that staff thought they had approval from the County, however they recently received ah email reversing the decision. He stated that the City was told that because it is illegal to pass on the shoulder, the signs would be repetitive. He stated that staff is at a dead end in the process but car! give information to the Council if they would like to pursue this further. Mayor Zerby stated that he is willing to take this on and asked for the appropriate contact information to get the process started. Public Works Director Brown noted that the clearance signs at the Shorewood Community and Event Center have been changed and are much more aesthetically pleasing. Mayor Zerby asked if the Boulder Bridge Wellhouse project was complete. CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES JANUARY 14, 2019 Page 13 of 14 Public Works Director Brown stated that there are a few items that still need to be completed and noted that the wellhouse is still off -line. He noted that the needed equipment should arrive in February so he expects the project to be completed by mid - February. City Engineer Fauske noted that the Minnesota Environmental Quality Board has put together some recommended changes including the threshold for the environmental assessment worksheet. She stated that the Wetland Conservation Act already governs that and staff is working on presenting a letter with comments to present to the Minnesota Environmental Quality Board expressing the opinion that it may be onerous and repetitive. City Clerk Thone encouraged the Council to come down to the Shorewood Community and Event Center to take a look at the aesthetic changes they have made. She noted that there was a class held there earlier today that was limited to ten people but fifteen,people were interested and three of them found out about the class through the electric signage. Mayor Zerby noted that the sign appears to only have one message per day and would like to see it rotate through numerous messages, if possible. City Administrator Lerud encouraged the Council to volunteer on Friday evening; January 18, 2019 at the Shorewood Community and Event Center and to let`Twila or himself know. He noted that currently there are four topics for the retreat: Review the 2018 Goals and Progress, City Infrastructure, Staffing, and Shorewood Community and Event Center. He asked that the Council let him know if there were other topics that they would like to see included. City Attorney Keane stated that he would be willing to assist City Engineer Fauske with the letter to the Environmental Quality Control Board. B. Mayor and City Co She stated that she has been hearing a lot about how bad the City's mail delivery is. She stated that she had spoken with'taff and there is really nothing that can be done. She asked if the other Councilmembers have been seeing problems with mail delivery in their areas. She stated that the issues she has heard about are that they are completely bypassing areas and not stopping, even when the flag is up on I the mailbox. Councilmember Johnson stated that'he concurs and noted that many times he does not get his agenda packets until after the meeting has already been held. He stated that he has had mail delivered to Minnewashta School quite frequently. Councilmember Labadie noted that she had not had those specific issues but her mail delivery has gotten continuously: later in the day. She stated that she has also received many pieces of mail that do not belong to her. She stated that she has physically taken them back to the post office to explain and noted that some of them have appeared to be very important documents. Councilmember Sundberg asked City Attorney Keane if the City had any recourse with the U.S. Postal Service. City Attorney Keane stated that action could be taken through the elected Congressional Representatives. Councilmember Sundberg asked that the City put together a letter to send to our representatives, the State Postmaster, and the Excelsior Postmaster. CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES JANUARY 14, 2019 Page 14 of 14 Councilmember Johnson noted that the trash in his neighborhood is also not being picked up until well after 6:00 p.m. Mayor Zerby gave a brief update on the recent Police Board Meeting. 11. ADJOURN Johnson moved, Sundberg seconded, Adjourning the City Council Regular Meeting of January 14, 2019, at 9:20 P.M. Motion passed 5/0. ATTEST: Sandie Thone, City Clerk #2C MEETING TYPE City of Shorewood Council Meeting Item Regular Meeting Title / Subject: Verified Claims Meeting Date: January 28, 2019 Prepared by: Michelle Nguyen, Senior Accountant Greg Lerud, City Administrator Joe Rigdon, Finance Director Attachments: Claims lists Policy Consideration: Should the attached claims against the City of Shorewood be paid? Background: Claims for council authorization. 61546 - 65175 & ACH 1,345,070.22 Total Claims $1,345,070.22 We have also included a payroll summary for the payroll period ending January 20, 2019. Financial or Budget Considerations: These expenditures are reasonable and necessary to provide services to our residents and funds are budgeted and available for these purposes. Options: The City Council is may accept the staff recommendation to pay these claims or may reject any expenditure it deems not in the best interest of the city. Recommendation / Action Requested: Staff recommends approval of the claims list as presented. Next Steps and Timelines: Checks will be distributed following approval. Account Number Debit Amount Credit Amount Description FUND 101 General Fund 101 -00- 1010 -0000 0.00 81,069.21 CASH AND INVESTMENTS 101 -11- 4103 -0000 1,716.64 0.00 PART -TIME 101 -11- 4122 -0000 131.31 0.00 FICA CONTRIB - CITY SHARE 101 -13- 4101 -0000 10,962.73 0.00 FULL -TIME REGULAR 101 -13- 4103 -0000 570.15 0.00 PART -TIME 101 -13- 4121 -0000 864.94 0.00 PERA CONTRIB - CITY SHARE 101 -13- 4122 -0000 801.21 0.00 FICA CONTRIB - CITY SHARE 101 -13- 4131 -0000 4,738.36 0.00 EMPLOYEE INSURANCE - CITY 101 -13- 4151 -0000 100.52 0.00 WORKERS COMPENSATION 101 -15- 4101 -0000 5,011.44 0.00 FULL -TIME REGULAR 101 -15- 4121 -0000 375.90 0.00 PERA CONTRIB - CITY SHARE 101 -15- 4122 -0000 377.90 0.00 FICA CONTRIB - CITY SHARE 101 -15- 4131 -0000 2,269.16 0.00 EMPLOYEE INSURANCE - CITY 101 -15- 4151 -0000 28.66 0.00 WORKERS COMPENSATION 101 -18- 4101 -0000 5,249.68 0.00 FULL -TIME REGULAR 101 -18- 4121 -0000 393.77 0.00 PERA CONTRIB - CITY SHARE 101 -18- 4122 -0000 408.98 0.00 FICA CONTRIB - CITY SHARE 101 -18- 4131 -0000 3,540.55 0.00 EMPLOYEE INSURANCE - CITY 101 -18- 4151 -0000 38.78 0.00 WORKERS COMPENSATION 101 -24- 4101 -0000 7,296.10 0.00 FULL -TIME REGULAR 101 -24- 4121 -0000 547.19 0.00 PERA CONTRIB - CITY SHARE 101 -24- 4122 -0000 502.84 0.00 FICA CONTRIB - CITY SHARE 101 -24- 4131 -0000 1,337.74 0.00 EMPLOYEE INSURANCE - CITY 101 -24- 4151 -0000 39.12 0.00 WORKERS COMPENSATION 101 -32- 4101 -0000 12,231.22 0.00 FULL -TIME REGULAR 101 -32- 4105 -0000 835.64 0.00 STREET PAGER PAY 101 -32- 4121 -0000 859.20 0.00 PERA CONTRIB - CITY SHARE 101 -32- 4122 -0000 949.49 0.00 FICA CONTRIB - CITY SHARE 101 -32- 4131 -0000 5,481.37 0.00 EMPLOYEE INSURANCE - CITY 101 -32- 4151 -0000 800.03 0.00 WORKERS COMPENSATION 101 -33- 4101 -0000 711.09 0.00 FULL -TIME REGULAR 101 -33- 4121 -0000 51.47 0.00 PERA CONTRIB - CITY SHARE 101 -33- 4122 -0000 59.18 0.00 FICA CONTRIB - CITY SHARE 101 -33- 4131 -0000 760.32 0.00 EMPLOYEE INSURANCE - CITY PR - G/L Distribution Report (01/18/2019 - 1:18 PM) Page 1 Account Number Debit Amount Credit Amount Description 101 -33- 4151 -0000 52.36 0.00 WORKERS COMPENSATION 101 -52- 4101 -0000 4,827.33 0.00 FULL -TIME REGULAR 101 -52- 4121 -0000 341.60 0.00 PERA CONTRIB - CITY SHARE 101 -52- 4122 -0000 329.67 0.00 FICA CONTRIB - CITY SHARE 101 -52- 4131 -0000 2,354.97 0.00 EMPLOYEE INSURANCE - CITY 101 -52- 4151 -0000 213.76 0.00 WORKERS COMPENSATION 101 -53- 4101 -0000 1,867.76 0.00 FULL -TIME REGULAR 101 -53- 4103 -0000 615.00 0.00 PART -TIME 101 -53- 4121 -0000 140.08 0.00 PERA CONTRIB - CITY SHARE 101 -53- 4122 -0000 183.55 0.00 FICA CONTRIB - CITY SHARE 101 -53- 4131 -0000 24.23 0.00 EMPLOYEE INSURANCE - CITY 101 -53- 4151 -0000 76.22 0.00 WORKERS COMPENSATION FUND Total: 81,069.21 81,069.21 FUND 201 Shorewood Comm. & Event Center CASH AND INVESTMENTS 201 -00- 1010 -0000 0.00 1,990.76 CASH AND INVESTMENTS 201 -00- 4101 -0000 817.91 0.00 FULL -TIME REGULAR 201 -00- 4102 -0000 511.49 0.00 OVERTIME 201 -00- 4103 -0000 435.96 0.00 PART -TIME 201 -00- 4121 -0000 61.34 0.00 PERA CONTRIB - CITY SHARE 201 -00- 4122 -0000 85.94 0.00 FICA CONTRIB - CITY SHARE 201 -00- 4131 -0000 18.18 0.00 EMPLOYEE INSURANCE - CITY 201 -00- 4151 -0000 59.94 0.00 WORKERS COMPENSATION FUND Total: 1,990.76 1,990.76 FUND 601 Water Utility 601 -00- 1010 -0000 0.00 10,512.62 CASH AND INVESTMENTS 601 -00- 4101 -0000 5,766.77 0.00 FULL -TIME REGULAR 601 -00- 4102 -0000 24.11 0.00 OVERTIME 601 -00- 4105 -0000 417.82 0.00 WATER PAGER PAY 601 -00- 4121 -0000 463.77 0.00 PERA CONTRIB - CITY SHARE 601 -00- 4122 -0000 441.62 0.00 FICA CONTRIB - CITY SHARE 601 -00- 4131 -0000 3,219.37 0.00 EMPLOYEE INSURANCE - CITY 601 -00- 4151 -0000 179.16 0.00 WORKERS COMPENSATION FUND Total: 10,512.62 10,512.62 FUND 611 Sanitary Sewer Utility 611 -00- 1010 -0000 0.00 8,452.85 CASH AND INVESTMENTS 611 -00- 4101 -0000 4,605.51 0.00 FULL -TIME REGULAR 611 -00- 4105 -0000 417.82 0.00 SEWER PAGER PAY 611 -00- 4121 -0000 374.92 0.00 PERA CONTRIB - CITY SHARE 611 -00- 4122 -0000 348.04 0.00 FICA CONTRIB - CITY SHARE PR - G/L Distribution Report (01/18/2019 - 1:18 PM) Page 2 Account Number Debit Amount Credit Amount Description 611 -00- 4131 -0000 2,556.61 0.00 EMPLOYEE INSURANCE - CITY 611 -00- 4151 -0000 149.95 0.00 WORKERS COMPENSATION FUND Total: 8,452.85 8,452.85 FUND 621 Recycling Utility 621 -00- 1010 -0000 0.00 400.18 CASH AND INVESTMENTS 621 -00- 4101 -0000 288.99 0.00 FULL -TIME REGULAR 621 -00- 4121 -0000 21.68 0.00 PERA CONTRIB - CITY SHARE 621 -00- 4122 -0000 12.26 0.00 FICA CONTRIB - CITY SHARE 621 -00- 4131 -0000 75.14 0.00 EMPLOYEE INSURANCE - CITY 621 -00- 4151 -0000 2.11 0.00 WORKERS COMPENSATION FUND Total: 400.18 400.18 FUND 631 Storm Water Utility 631 -00- 1010 -0000 0.00 1,950.38 CASH AND INVESTMENTS 631 -00- 4101 -0000 1,290.53 0.00 FULL -TIME REGULAR 631 -00- 4121 -0000 94.88 0.00 PERA CONTRIB - CITY SHARE 631 -00- 4122 -0000 96.45 0.00 FICA CONTRIB - CITY SHARE 631 -00- 4131 -0000 437.18 0.00 EMPLOYEE INSURANCE - CITY 631 -00- 4151 -0000 31.34 0.00 WORKERS COMPENSATION FUND Total: 1,950.38 1,950.38 FUND 700 Payroll Clearing Fund 700 -00- 1010 -0000 104,376.00 0.00 CASH AND INVESTMENTS 700 -00- 2170 -0000 0.00 41,761.14 GROSS PAYROLL CLEARING 700 -00- 2171 -0000 0.00 9,718.11 HEALTH INSURANCE PAYABLE 700 -00- 2172 -0000 0.00 4,776.51 FEDERAL WITHHOLDING PAYABLE 700 -00- 2173 -0000 0.00 2,506.94 STATE WITHHOLDING PAYABLE 700 -00- 2174 -0000 0.00 9,456.88 FICA/MEDICARE TAX PAYABLE 700 -00- 2175 -0000 0.00 8,569.39 PERA WITHHOLDING PAYABLE 700 -00- 2176 -0000 0.00 4,569.92 DEFERRED COMPENSATION 700 -00- 2177 -0000 0.00 1,771.95 WORKERS COMPENSATION 700 -00- 2181 -0000 0.00 1,378.78 DISABILITY INSURANCE 700 -00- 2183 -0000 0.00 18,827.08 HEALTH SAVINGS ACCOUNT 700 -00- 2184 -0000 0.00 591.30 DENTAL DELTA 700 -00- 2185 -0000 0.00 448.00 DENTAL - UNION FUND Total: 104,376.00 104,376.00 Report Total: 208,752.00 208,752.00 PR - G/L Distribution Report (01/18/2019 - 1:18 PM) Page 3 Accounts Payable Computer Check Proof List by Vendor User: mnguyen Printed: 01/23/2019 - 4:23PM Batch: 00002.01.2019 - CC -01 -28 -2019 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference Vendor: 105 ADVANCED IMAGING SOLUTIONS Check Sequence: 1 ACH Enabled: True INV 186950 Monthly Maint- Konica Minolta 115.00 01/28/2019 101 -13- 4221 -0000 Check Total: 115.00 Vendor: 4 AFSCME CO 5 MEMBER HEALTH FUND Check Sequence: 2 ACH Enabled: True January -2019 PR Batch 00002.01.2019 Dental - Union 448.00 01/18/2019 700 -00- 2185 -0000 PR Batch 00002.01.2019 Dental - Union Check Total: 448.00 Vendor: 817 ARCPOINT LABS OF EDEN PRAIRIE Check Sequence: 3 ACH Enabled: False 1343 Annual Random Pool Management Fee 480.00 01/28/2019 101 -32- 4305 -0000 Check Total: 480.00 Vendor: 150 CLASSIC CLEANING COMPANY Check Sequence: 4 ACH Enabled: False 27651 City Hall Monthly Svc 495.00 01/28/2019 101 -19- 4400 -0000 27652 Public Works Monthly Svc 295.00 01/28/2019 101 -32- 4400 -0000 Check Total: 790.00 Vendor: UB *00225 Richard & Barbara Collison Check Sequence: 5 ACH Enabled: False Refund Check 63.72 01/14/2019 611 -00- 2010 -0000 Refund Check 27.31 01/14/2019 621 -00- 2010 -0000 Refund Check 27.31 01/14/2019 631 -00- 2010 -0000 Check Total: 118.34 Vendor: 573 COMPASS MINERALS AMERICA Check Sequence: 6 ACH Enabled: False 375492 Salt 9,284.24 01/28/2019 101 -33- 4245 -0000 Check Total: 9,284.24 Vendor: UB *00227 James & Cherie Daughton Check Sequence: 7 ACH Enabled: False AP- Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (01/23/2019 - 4:23 PM) Page 1 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 35.68 Refund Check 631 -00- 2010 -0000 Refund Check 01/28/2019 Refund Check 83.25 Check Total: Vendor: 3 DELTA DENTAL OF MINNESOTA Jan - 2019 -Jean January COBRA - Jean Panchyshyn January -2019 PR Batch 00002.01.2019 Dental - Non Union Check Sequence: 8 ACH Enabled: True Check Total: Vendor: UB *00221 Ronald & Paula Diedrich 591.30 Refund Check 700 -00- 2184 -0000 PR Batch 00002.01.2019 Dental - Non Uni Refund Check 601 -00- 2010 -0000 Refund Check 150.00 Refund Check Check Total: Vendor: 5 EFTPS - FEDERAL W/H PR -01 -18 -2019 PR Batch 00002.01.2019 Federal Income Tax PR -01 -18 -2019 PR Batch 00002.01.2019 FICA Employee Portio PR -01 -18 -2019 PR Batch 00002.01.2019 FICA Employer Portioj PR -01 -18 -2019 PR Batch 00002.01.2019 Medicare Employee Pc PR -01 -18 -2019 PR Batch 00002.01.2019 Medicare Employer Po 3,832.21 Check Total: Vendor: UB *00224 Executive Title of MN, LLC -Trust Account 896.23 Refund Check 700 -00- 2174 -0000 Refund Check 896.23 Refund Check 700 -00- 2174 -0000 Check Total: Vendor: 200 GOPHER STATE ONE CALL 9000723 Monthly Rental 9000723 Monthly Rental 9000723 Monthly Rental 116.88 Check Total: Vendor: 803 GRANITE LEDGE ELECTRIC 35.68 01/28/2019 631 -00- 2010 -0000 35.68 01/28/2019 621 -00- 2010 -0000 83.25 01/28/2019 611 -00- 2010 -0000 154.61 621 -00- 2010 -0000 55.28 01/14/2019 Check Sequence: 8 ACH Enabled: True 44.55 01/18/2019 700 -00- 2184 -0000 PR Batch 00002.01.2019 Dental - Non Uni 591.30 01/18/2019 700 -00- 2184 -0000 PR Batch 00002.01.2019 Dental - Non Uni bJ J.bJ Check Sequence: 9 ACH Enabled: False 23.69 01/14/2019 621 -00- 2010 -0000 55.28 01/14/2019 611 -00- 2010 -0000 23.67 01/14/2019 631 -00- 2010 -0000 47.36 01/14/2019 601 -00- 2010 -0000 150.00 Check Sequence: 10 ACH Enabled: True 4,776.51 01/18/2019 700 -00- 2172 -0000 PR Batch 00002.01.2019 Federal Income 1 3,832.21 01/18/2019 700 -00- 2174 -0000 PR Batch 00002.01.2019 FICA Employee _ 3,832.21 01/18/2019 700 -00- 2174 -0000 PR Batch 00002.01.2019 FICA Employer 1 896.23 01/18/2019 700 -00- 2174 -0000 PR Batch 00002.01.2019 Medicare Emplo,. 896.23 01/18/2019 700 -00- 2174 -0000 PR Batch 00002.01.2019 Medicare Emplo,. 14,233.39 Check Sequence: 11 ACH Enabled: False 116.88 01/14/2019 631 -00- 2010 -0000 116.88 01/14/2019 621 -00- 2010 -0000 272.72 01/14/2019 611 -00- 2010 -0000 506.48 Check Sequence: 12 ACH Enabled: True 16.67 01/28/2019 601 -00- 4400 -0000 16.66 01/28/2019 611 -00- 4400 -0000 16.67 01/28/2019 631 -00- 4400 -0000 50.00 Check Sequence: 13 ACH Enabled: False AP- Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (01/23/2019 - 4:23 PM) Page 2 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference L19010 Signal Relamp- Greenwood 299.46 01/28/2019 101 -32- 4245 -0000 L19010 Signal Relamp 299.45 01/28/2019 101 -32- 4400 -0000 Check Total: 598.91 Vendor: UB *00226 Christopher Guarnera Check Sequence: 14 ACH Enabled: False Refund Check 4.91 01/14/2019 601 -00- 2010 -0000 Refund Check 2.45 01/14/2019 631 -00- 2010 -0000 Refund Check 2.46 01/14/2019 621 -00- 2010 -0000 Refund Check 5.73 01/14/2019 611 -00- 2010 -0000 Check Total: 15.55 Vendor: 1002 WILLIAM & JAN HALE Check Sequence: 15 ACH Enabled: False 28028Woodside Refund Special Assessment -28028 Woodside Ro 2,343.24 01/28/2019 601 -00- 3610 -0000 Check Total: 2,343.24 Vendor: 6 HEALTH PARTNERS -GROUP Check Sequence: 16 ACH Enabled: False Jan - 2019 -Jean COBRA- Jean Panchyshyn 760.27 01/04/2019 700 -00- 2171 -0000 PR Batch 00001.01.2019 Health Insurance January -2019 PR Batch 00002.01.2019 Health Ins - CoPay 3,596.88 01/18/2019 700 -00- 2171 -0000 PR Batch 00002.01.2019 Health Ins - Cop; January -2019 PR Batch 00002.01.2019 Health Insurance -HSA 6,121.23 01/18/2019 700 -00- 2171 -0000 PR Batch 00002.01.2019 Health Insurance January -2019 PR Batch 00001.01.2019 Health Ins - CoPay 3,596.88 01/04/2019 700 -00- 2171 -0000 PR Batch 00001.01.2019 Health Ins - Cop; January -2019 PR Batch 00001.01.2019 Health Insurance -HSA 6,121.23 01/04/2019 700 -00- 2171 -0000 PR Batch 00001.01.2019 Health Insurance Check Total: 20,196.49 Vendor: 216 HENNEPIN COUNTY RECORDER & REGIS Check Sequence: 17 ACH Enabled: False Res -18 -097 Record Service- Vacating an Undeveloped Portioi 46.00 01/28/2019 101 -18- 4400 -0000 Record Res -18 -122 Subd. & Setback Variance - 5865/5885 Glencoe : 46.00 01/28/2019 101 -18- 4400 -0000 Record Res -18 -130 28015 Woodside Road 46.00 01/28/2019 101 -18- 4400 -0000 Record Check Total: 138.00 Vendor: 214 HENNEPIN COUNTY PUBLIC HEALTH DER Check Sequence: 18 ACH Enabled: False 990389 F008 -Food High Small Facility 693.00 01/28/2019 201 -00- 4437 -0000 990389 F003 -Food Low Additional 90.00 01/28/2019 201 -00- 4437 -0000 Check Total: 783.00 Vendor: 896 HUEBSCH SERVICES Check Sequence: 19 ACH Enabled: True 4222160 SSCC Mats 32.00 01/28/2019 201 -00- 4400 -0000 4222160 City Hall Mats 87.71 01/28/2019 101 -19- 4400 -0000 AP- Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (01/23/2019 - 4:23 PM) Page 3 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference Check Total: 119.71 Vendor: 2 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST - 302131 -457 Check Sequence: 20 ACH Enabled: False PR -01 -18 -2019 PR Batch 00002.01.2019 Deferred Comp Flat Ai 4,407.00 01/18/2019 700 -00- 2176 -0000 PR Batch 00002.01.2019 Deferred Comp t PR -01 -18 -2019 PR Batch 00002.01.2019 Deferred Comp Percen 162.92 01/18/2019 700 -00- 2176 -0000 PR Batch 00002.01.2019 Deferred Comp F Check Total: 4,569.92 Vendor: 686 KANSAS CITY LIFE INSURANCE COMPAN' Check Sequence: 21 ACH Enabled: True January -2019 PR Batch 00002.01.2019 Long Term Disability 645.72 01/18/2019 700 -00- 2181 -0000 PR Batch 00002.01.2019 Long Term Disat January -2019 PR Batch 00002.01.2019 Short Term Disability 733.06 01/18/2019 700 -00- 2181 -0000 PR Batch 00002.01.2019 Short Term Disat Check Total: 1,378.78 Vendor: 965 MCI COMM SERVICE Check Sequence: 22 ACH Enabled: False 6N372302- 011119 952 - 470 - 9605 - Amesbury 33.71 01/28/2019 601 -00- 4394 -0000 6N372303- 011119 952 - 470 - 9606 - Amesbury 33.71 01/28/2019 601 -00- 4394 -0000 Check Total: 67.42 Vendor: UB *00223 Mary McNutt Check Sequence: 23 ACH Enabled: False Refund Check 34.41 01/14/2019 601 -00- 2010 -0000 Refund Check 40.15 01/14/2019 611 -00- 2010 -0000 Refund Check 17.21 01/14/2019 621 -00- 2010 -0000 Refund Check 17.20 01/14/2019 631 -00- 2010 -0000 Check Total: 108.97 Vendor: 281 METRO CITIES Check Sequence: 24 ACH Enabled: False 150 2019 Metro Cities Dues 3,213.00 01/28/2019 101 -11- 4433 -0000 Check Total: 3,213.00 Vendor: 279 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL (WASTEWATE Check Sequence: 25 ACH Enabled: True 1090877 Monthly Waste Water Svc 72,430.21 01/28/2019 611 -00- 4385 -0000 Check Total: 72,430.21 Vendor: 792 METROPOLITAN AREA MANAGEMENT AS Check Sequence: 26 ACH Enabled: False 31 Luncheon 1/10/19 -Greg Lerud 25.00 01/28/2019 101 -13- 4331 -0000 Check Total: 25.00 Vendor: 813 MIDWAY FORD COMPANY Check Sequence: 27 ACH Enabled: False AP- Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (01/23/2019 - 4:23 PM) Page 4 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 120536 2019 Ford F250 - VIN- 1FT7X2B63KED40532 31,904.88 01/28/2019 403 -00- 4640 -0000 Check Total: 31,904.88 Vendor: UB *00228 Christopher & Courtney Miernicki Check Sequence: 28 ACH Enabled: False Refund Check 55.11 01/28/2019 601 -00- 2010 -0000 Refund Check 64.28 01/28/2019 611 -00- 2010 -0000 Refund Check 27.55 01/28/2019 621 -00- 2010 -0000 Refund Check 27.56 01/28/2019 631 -00- 2010 -0000 Check Total: 174.50 Vendor: 11 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE Check Sequence: 29 ACH Enabled: True PR -01 -18 -2019 PR Batch 00002.01.2019 State Income Tax 2,506.94 01/18/2019 700 -00- 2173 -0000 PR Batch 00002.01.2019 State Income Tax Check Total: 2,506.94 Vendor: 322 OFFICE DEPOT Check Sequence: 30 ACH Enabled: False 260184594001 W -2 Forms 15.98 01/28/2019 101 -15- 4200 -0000 260184595001 1099 Forms 35.98 01/28/2019 101 -15- 4200 -0000 Check Total: 51.96 Vendor: 665 OPTUM BANK Check Sequence: 31 ACH Enabled: True PR -01 -18 -2019 PR Batch 00002.01.2019 HSA - OPTUM BANK 18,827.08 01/18/2019 700 -00- 2183 -0000 PR Batch 00002.01.2019 HSA - OPTUM B. Check Total: 18, 827.08 Vendor: 9 PERA Check Sequence: 32 ACH Enabled: True PR -01 -18 -2019 PR Batch 00002.01.2019 MN -PERA Deduction 3,978.65 01/18/2019 700 -00- 2175 -0000 PR Batch 00002.01.2019 MN -PERA Dedu PR -01 -18 -2019 PR Batch 00002.01.2019 MN PERA Benefit Em 4,590.74 01/18/2019 700 -00- 2175 -0000 PR Batch 00002.01.2019 MN PERA Benel Check Total: 8,569.39 Vendor: 332 PETTY CASH Check Sequence: 33 ACH Enabled: False 01- 10- 2019Short Petty Cash Short 20.00 01/28/2019 101 -19- 4440 -0000 Check Total: 20.00 Vendor: 864 QUALITY FLOW SYSTEMS, INC. Check Sequence: 34 ACH Enabled: False 36471 Emergency Repair -L.S. 2,560.00 01/28/2019 611 -00- 4400 -0000 Check Total: 2,560.00 Vendor: 360 SOUTH LAKE MINNETONKA POLICE DEPA Check Sequence: 35 ACH Enabled: False AP- Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (01/23/2019 - 4:23 PM) Page 5 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 1st Qtr- 2019 -DS Quarterly- Debt Service January- 2019 -013 Monthly - Operating Budget Exp 105,474.42 Check Total: Vendor: 1003 US BANK TRUST N.A. 261502000 -2019 2016A Debt Service 274190000 -2019 2016C Debt Service 277082000 -2019 2016B Debt Service Check Sequence: 36 Check Total: Vendor: 415 WARNER CONNECT 29937066 Monthly Network Maint Services 150,950.00 Check Total: Vendor: UB *00222 Patrick Zettel 378,750.00 Refund Check 308 -00- 1030 -0000 Refund Check 897,750.00 Refund Check Refund Check Check Total: Vendor: 414 ZIEGLER INC PC002032071 Alternator Grader 101 -19- 4321 -0000 Check Total: 2,826.75 Total for Check Run: Total of Number of Checks: AP- Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (01/23/2019 - 4:23 PM) 53,314.00 01/28/2019 101 -21- 4620 -0000 105,474.42 01/28/2019 101 -21- 4400 -0000 158,788.42 Check Sequence: 36 ACH Enabled: True 368,050.00 01/28/2019 307 -00- 1030 -0000 150,950.00 01/28/2019 309 -00- 1030 -0000 378,750.00 01/28/2019 308 -00- 1030 -0000 897,750.00 Check Sequence: 37 ACH Enabled: True 2,826.75 01/28/2019 101 -19- 4321 -0000 2,826.75 Check Sequence: 38 ACH Enabled: False 18.23 01/14/2019 601 -00- 2010 -0000 9.11 01/14/2019 621 -00- 2010 -0000 21.26 01/14/2019 611 -00- 2010 -0000 9.12 01/14/2019 631 -00- 2010 -0000 57.72 Check Sequence: 39 ACH Enabled: True 695.54 01/28/2019 101 -32- 4221 -0000 695.54 1,257,687.29 39 Page 6 Accounts Payable Computer Check Proof List by Vendor User: mnguyen Printed: 01/23/2019 - 4:43PM Batch: 00008.12.2018 - CC- 01 -28- 2019- 2018items Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Vendor: 171 AE2S CONSTRUCTION, LLC Check Sequence: 1 P.V. #1- Pr5481 Boulder Bridge MCC 5,731.76 12/31/2018 601 -00- 4680 -0000 P.V. #1- Pr5481 Boulder Bridge MCC - 5,731.76 12/31/2018 601 -00- 4680 -0000 P.V. #1- Proj5481 Boulder Bridge MCC 5,731.76 01/22/2019 601 -00- 4680 -0000 P.V. #3- Proj5481 Boulder Bridge MCC Project 11,020.00 12/31/2018 601 -00- 4680 -0000 Check Total: 16,751.76 Vendor: 868 BANK OF MONTREAL Check Sequence: 2 Dec - 2018 -AUTO Winstream -City Hall 128.93 12/31/2018 101 -19- 4321 -0000 Dec - 2018 -AUTO Culligan Bottled Water - Drink 105.64 12/31/2018 101 -19- 4245 -0000 Dec - 2018 -AUTO Republic Services 9,993.60 12/31/2018 621 -00- 4400 -0000 Dec - 2018 -AUTO Winstream - Boulder Bridge 65.36 12/31/2018 601 -00- 4396 -0000 Dec - 2018 -AUTO Winstream - Public Works 62.57 12/31/2018 101 -32- 4321 -0000 Dec - 2018 -AUTO Waste Mgmt- Public Works 587.76 12/31/2018 101 -32- 4400 -0000 Dec - 2018 -AUTO Waste Mgmt -SSCC 232.90 12/31/2018 201 -00- 4400 -0000 Dec - 2018 -AUTO Chanhassen- 18505 -002 - Stormwa 45.72 12/31/2018 101 -52- 4380 -0000 Dec - 2018 -AUTO Winstream -West Tower 130.45 12/31/2018 601 -00- 4321 -0000 Dec - 2018 -AUTO Winstream -3 Parks 202.04 12/31/2018 101 -52- 4321 -0000 Dec - 2018 -AUTO Winstream - Badger Well 65.36 12/31/2018 601 -00- 4395 -0000 Dec - 2018 -AUTO S & S Tree Horticultural Spec 1,600.00 12/31/2018 101 -32- 4400 -0000 Dec - 2018 -AUTO Verizon -Lift Station 13.80 12/31/2018 611 -00- 4321 -0000 Dec - 2018 -AUTO Culligan Bottled Water -Solar 82.40 12/31/2018 201 -00- 4245 -0000 Dec - 2018 -AUTO Ferguson - Water Meters 5,560.98 12/31/2018 601 -00- 4265 -0000 Dec - 2018 - Bauman Locator - Safety PPE 115.55 12/31/2018 101 -32- 4245 -0000 Dec - 2018 - Bauman Northernsafety- Cleaner 2.55 12/31/2018 101 -32- 4245 -0000 Dec - 2018 - Bauman Northernsafety- Cleaner 17.88 12/31/2018 101 -32- 4245 -0000 Dec - 2018 - Bauman Sams Club- Supplies 226.72 12/31/2018 101 -52- 4245 -0000 Dec - 2018 - Bauman Grainger -Meter 62.67 12/31/2018 611 -00- 4221 -0000 Dec - 2018 - Bauman Shorewood True -Tape Measurement 27.97 12/31/2018 101 -32- 4245 -0000 Dec - 2018 -Brown Gas 40.43 12/31/2018 101 -32- 4212 -0000 Dec - 2018 -Brown Int- Enabling - Data Svc 20.00 12/31/2018 601 -00- 4321 -0000 Dec - 2018 -Brown Int- Enabling - Data Svc 20.00 12/31/2018 601 -00- 4321 -0000 Reference ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: True AP- Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (01/23/2019 - 4:43 PM) Page 1 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference Dec - 2018 -Brown Smartsign - Signs 79.13 12/31/2018 101 -52- 4245 -0000 Dec - 2018 -Brown Adobe - Adobe SW Subscription 193.42 12/31/2018 101 -32- 4433 -0000 Dec - 2018 - Darlin Amazon- Supplies 8.99 12/31/2018 101 -18- 4200 -0000 Dec - 2018 - Esling Gas 193.06 12/31/2018 101 -32- 4212 -0000 Dec - 2018 -Faschi Gas 181.99 12/31/2018 101 -32- 4212 -0000 Dec - 2018 -Faschi Shorewood True -Parts 13.84 12/31/2018 101 -32- 4245 -0000 Dec - 2018 -Faschi Home Depot - Heater 42.89 12/31/2018 601 -00- 4221 -0000 Dec - 2018 -Grout Glass Mirror - Glass top for Desk 98.78 12/31/2018 201 -00- 4223 -0000 Dec - 2018 -Grout Home Depot -Door Stops 46.63 12/31/2018 201 -00- 4223 -0000 Dec - 2018 -Grout Target -gLass Beverage Counters 64.36 12/31/2018 201 -00- 4223 -0000 Dec - 2018 -Hanson Gas 1,010.16 12/31/2018 101 -32- 4212 -0000 Dec - 2018 -Heitz Gas 553.00 12/31/2018 101 -32- 4212 -0000 Dec - 2018 -Heitz Grainger - Lamps 115.20 12/31/2018 101 -32- 4245 -0000 Dec - 2018 -Heitz Shorewood True -Hex Wrenches 9.49 12/31/2018 101 -52- 4240 -0000 Dec - 2018 -Lerud Sams Club- Supplies 65.47 12/31/2018 101 -19- 4245 -0000 Dec - 2018 -Lerud Sams Club- Supplies 51.96 12/31/2018 201 -00- 4245 -0000 Dec - 2018 -Lerud Menards - Furnace Filters 30.26 12/31/2018 101 -19- 4245 -0000 Dec - 2018 -Mason Gas 396.01 12/31/2018 101 -32- 4212 -0000 Dec - 2018 -Mason Carrquest- FIlters 49.21 12/31/2018 101 -32- 4212 -0000 Dec - 2018 -Mason Carrquest- FIlter 18.83 12/31/2018 101 -32- 4221 -0000 Dec - 2018 -Mason Boyer Ford Truck -Stop Lamp 30.16 12/31/2018 101 -32- 4221 -0000 Dec - 2018 -Mason Discount Steel -Steel 113.28 12/31/2018 101 -32- 4245 -0000 Dec - 2018 -Mason MN State College - Vehicle Insepction Recertifica 100.00 12/31/2018 101 -32- 4331 -0000 Dec - 2018 -Mason Shorewood True -Caulk 16.12 12/31/2018 101 -32- 4245 -0000 Dec - 2018 -Mason Titan Machinery- Antenna 58.00 12/31/2018 101 -32- 4221 -0000 Dec - 2018 -Mason Titan Machinery - Antenna Return -29.00 12/31/2018 101 -32- 4221 -0000 Dec - 2018 -Moore Amazon- Arctic Fever 39.64 12/31/2018 101 -53- 4441 -0000 Dec - 2018 -Moore Adobe- Subcription 29.99 12/31/2018 101 -13- 4433 -0000 Dec - 2018 -Moore Constantcontact- Email Marketing 714.00 12/31/2018 101 -13- 4433 -0000 Dec - 2018 - Pounde Gas 259.59 12/31/2018 101 -32- 4212 -0000 Dec - 2018 - Pounde Shorewood True- Sovel- Clamp 47.96 12/31/2018 101 -52- 4240 -0000 Dec - 2018 - Pricco Ferguson - Water Meters 3,194.09 12/31/2018 601 -00- 4265 -0000 Dec - 2018 - Pricco Office Depot - Supplies 279.83 12/31/2018 101 -13- 4200 -0000 Dec - 2018 - Pricco Amazon- Supplies 9.35 12/31/2018 101 -13- 4200 -0000 Dec - 2018 - Rigdon Aicpa- CPE Subscription 214.19 12/31/2018 101 -15- 4331 -0000 Dec - 2018 - Schroe Gas 358.43 12/31/2018 101 -32- 4212 -0000 Dec - 2018 - Schroe Home Depot -MB Materials 46.93 12/31/2018 101 -32- 4245 -0000 Dec - 2018 - Schroe UFC Farm Supply- Shovel 43.00 12/31/2018 101 -52- 4240 -0000 Dec - 2018 - Schroe Navarre True- Hardware 10.28 12/31/2018 101 -52- 4240 -0000 Dec - 2018 - Schroe Shorewood True -Tools 37.96 12/31/2018 101 -52- 4240 -0000 Dec - 2018 - Schroe Mill Fleet Farm - Chain 39.72 12/31/2018 101 -32- 4245 -0000 Dec - 2018 - Schroe Northern Tool - toolbox 51.59 12/31/2018 101 -52- 4240 -0000 Dec - 2018 -Stark Gas 95.25 12/31/2018 101 -32- 4212 -0000 AP- Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (01/23/2019 - 4:43 PM) Page 2 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference Dec - 2018 -Stark Grainger - Ice Rink Lamps 217.56 12/31/2018 101 -52- 4245 -0000 Dec - 2018 -Stark Shorewood True - Ice Rink Lamps 4.49 12/31/2018 101 -52- 4245 -0000 Dec - 2018 -Thone Amazon - PC Swabs 9.95 12/31/2018 101 -13- 4200 -0000 Dec - 2018 -Thone Amazon - Desk Calendar 7.07 12/31/2018 101 -13- 4200 -0000 Dec - 2018 -Thone Amazon - Sharpie Pens 12.58 12/31/2018 101 -13- 4200 -0000 Dec - 2018 -Thone Kowalskis -Dept Mtg 20.50 12/31/2018 101 -13- 4245 -0000 Dec - 2018 -Thone Becker - Furniture 2,378.01 12/31/2018 201 -00- 4223 -0000 Dec - 2018 -Thone Becker - Furniture 53.75 12/31/2018 201 -00- 4223 -0000 Dec - 2018 - Woodwa Continuing Education 435.00 12/31/2018 101 -24- 4331 -0000 Check Total: 31, 533.23 Vendor: 136 CENTERPOINT ENERGY Check Sequence: 3 ACH Enabled: True 12312018 20405 Knighsbridge Rd 113.53 12/31/2018 601 -00- 4394 -0000 12312018 28125 Boulder Bridge 235.15 12/31/2018 601 -00- 4396 -0000 12312018 24200 Smithtown Rd 710.65 12/31/2018 101 -32- 4380 -0000 12312018 5745 Ctry Club & 25200 Hwy 7 197.60 12/31/2018 101 -52- 4380 -0000 12312018 5755 Country Club Rd 313.29 12/31/2018 101 -19- 4380 -0000 79456885 - 122618 5735 Country Club Rd 263.27 12/31/2018 201 -00- 4380 -0000 86501806 - 122618 20630 Manor Rd 55.61 12/31/2018 101 -52- 4380 -0000 Check Total: 1,889.10 Vendor: 915 CINTAS Check Sequence: 4 ACH Enabled: False 4013038781 Monthly Svc - PWs 441.28 12/31/2018 101 -32- 4400 -0000 4013373884 Monthly Svc - PWs 414.95 12/31/2018 101 -32- 4400 -0000 4013694423 Monthly Svc - PWs 441.28 12/31/2018 101 -32- 4400 -0000 4014007012 Monthly Svc - PWs 414.95 12/31/2018 101 -32- 4400 -0000 4014333650 Monthly Svc - PWs 441.28 12/31/2018 101 -32- 4400 -0000 Check Total: 2,153.74 Vendor: 215 HENNEPIN COUNTY INFORMATION TECH] Check Sequence: 5 ACH Enabled: True 1000119702 Monthly Radio Fleet & MESB 121.56 12/31/2018 101 -32- 4321 -0000 Check Total: 121.56 Vendor: 968 LOUCKS, INC. Check Sequence: 6 ACH Enabled: False 35058 Badger Park Rehabilitation - Dec Svc 560.00 12/31/2018 402 -00- 4680 -0000 Check Total: 560.00 Vendor: 941 MINNESOTA ROOFING COMPANY Check Sequence: 7 ACH Enabled: False 012 -04 -2018 Reside & Reroof Boulder Bridge Well 22,415.00 12/31/2018 601 -00- 4680 -0000 AP- Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (01/23/2019 - 4:43 PM) Page 3 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference AP- Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (01/23/2019 - 4:43 PM) Page 4 Check Total: 22,415.00 Vendor: 305 MNSPECT, LLC Check Sequence: 8 ACH Enabled: True 7689 Inspection Services 2,030.00 12/31/2018 101 -24- 4400 -0000 Check Total: 2,030.00 Vendor: 421 VERIZON WIRELESS Check Sequence: 9 ACH Enabled: False 9821402686 Sewer & Water - Acct842017386 93.28 12/31/2018 601 -00- 4321 -0000 Acct #842017386 -00001 9821402686 Sewer & Water - Acct842017386 93.28 12/31/2018 611 -00- 4321 -0000 Acct #842017386 -00001 Check Total: 186.56 Vendor: 415 WARNER CONNECT Check Sequence: 10 ACH Enabled: True 29937152 Additional Services Charge 438.75 12/31/2018 101 -19- 4321 -0000 Check Total: 438.75 Vendor: 411 XCEL ENERGY, INC. Check Sequence: 11 ACH Enabled: True 5102846200 -Ja19 5655 Merry Lane 21.29 12/31/2018 101 -52- 4380 -0000 5655 Merry Lane 5145317119 - 012119 C.H.Svcs 541.29 12/31/2018 101 -19- 4380 -0000 C.H.Svcs 5145317119 - 012119 P.W. Bldg Svc 350.91 12/31/2018 101 -32- 4380 -0000 P.W. Bldg Svc 5145317119 - 012119 P.W. Street Lights Svc 3,334.19 12/31/2018 101 -32- 4399 -0000 P.W. Street Lights Svc 5145317119 - 012119 Parks 452.04 12/31/2018 101 -52- 4380 -0000 Parks 5145317119 - 012119 Amesbury 118.14 12/31/2018 601 -00- 4394 -0000 Amesbury 5145317119 - 012119 Boulder Bridge 448.34 12/31/2018 601 -00- 4396 -0000 Boulder Bridge 5145317119 - 012119 S.E. Area Svc 3,263.51 12/31/2018 601 -00- 4398 -0000 S.E. Area Svc 5145317119 - 012119 Lift Station Street Lights 637.07 12/31/2018 611 -00- 4380 -0000 L. S. Street Lights Check Total: 9,166.78 Vendor: 413 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE Check Sequence: 12 ACH Enabled: True 54097684 First Aid Supplies 136.45 12/31/2018 101 -32- 4245 -0000 Check Total: 136.45 Total for Check Run: 87,382.93 Total of Number of Checks: 12 AP- Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (01/23/2019 - 4:43 PM) Page 4 oLans" ON , City of Shorewood Council Meeting Item Title /Subject: 2019 Commission Appointments Meeting Date: January 28, 2019 Prepared by: Greg Lerud, City Administrator Reviewed by: Sandie Thone, City Clerk Attachments: Resolution 2D MEETING TYPE REGULAR Background: The City Council annually appoints representatives to serve on the boards of two organizations that represent a broad area; the Lake Minnetonka Communications Commission (LMCC), and Minnetonka Community Education (MCE). Staff has contacted or received word that the present representatives — Tom Lesser and Tad Shaw, respectively, are interested in being reappointed to their respective boards. Financial or Budget Considerations: None Options: Approve the attached Resolution or provide other direction to staff. Recommended Action: Staff recommends approval of the reappointment of the current representatives by approving the attached Resolution. Next Steps and Timeline: Staff will notify Mr. Lesser and Mr. Shaw, as well as the directors of the two organizations, of the City Council's decision. Mission Statement: The City of Shorewood is committed to providing residents quality public services, a healthy environment, a variety of attractive amenities, a sustainable tax base, and sound financial management through effective, efficient, and visionary leadership. Page 1 RESOLUTION 19- CITY OF SHOREWOOD COUNTY OF HENNEPIN STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 19- A RESOLUTION MAKING CITY REPRESENTATIVE APPOINTMENTS TO THE LAKE MINNETONKA COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION AND MINNETONKA COMMUNITY EDUCATION WHEREAS, Tom Lesser has previously been appointed by the City Council to serve as the City representative on the Lake Minnetonka Communications Commission (LMCC); and, WHEREAS, Tad Shaw has previously been appointed by the City Council to serve as the City representative on the Minnetonka Community Education (MCE) board; and WHEREAS, appointments to both boards are made annually; and, WHEREAS, both individuals have expressed an interest in being reappointed to their respective boards. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA that the Council makes the following appointments: 1. Tom Lesser to the Lake Minnetonka Communications Commission, for a term to expire February 29, 2020. 2. Tad Shaw to the Minnetonka Community Education board, for a term to expire January 31, 2020. Adopted by the City Council of Shorewood, Minnesota this 28th day of January 2019. Scott Zerby, Mayor Attest: Sandie Thone, City Clerk oLans" ON , City of Shorewood Council Meeting Item Title /Subject: Regular Appointment of Joe Rigdon as Finance Director Meeting Date: February 28, 2019 Prepared by: Greg Lerud, City Administrator Attachments: None 2E MEETING TYPE REGULAR Background: On July 9, 2018, the City Council approved the probationary appointment of Joe Rigdon to the position of Finance Director for the city. Upon completion of a six -month probationary period, Mr. Rigdon is to have a performance review with a recommendation being made by the City Administrator as to the regular appointment to the position. A performance review has been completed and a strong recommendation to remove Mr. Rigdon from probationary status and to regular appointment as the city's finance director. Mr. Rigdon has demonstrated attention to detail and outstanding competence in municipal finance. Financial or Budget Considerations: Having successfully completed the probationary period, it is recommended that Mr. Rigdon's hourly salary increase to $54.24 effective at the conclusion of the probationary period, and to step 17F on July 30, 2019 to bring him on a step in the compensation schedule. Options: The City Council has the ultimate authority regarding personnel decisions for the city. 1. Approve a regular appointment of Joe Rigdon to the position of Finance Director for the City of Shorewood. 2. Take no action and provide staff with alternate direction. Recommended Action: Staff recommends the City Council pass a motion making a regular appointment of Joe Rigdon as Finance Director for the City of Shorewood with the recommended pay increases. Mission Statement: The City of Shorewood is committed to providing residents quality public services, a healthy environment, a variety of attractive amenities, a sustainable tax base, and sound financial management through effective, efficient, and visionary leadership. Page 1 4A MEETING TYPE City of Shorewood Council Meeting Item Regular Meeting Title /Subject: Lawtonka Villas PUD — Concept and Development Stage and Minor Subdivision for Greenwood Design Build, LLC. Location: 23825 Lawtonka Drive Meeting Date: January 28, 2019 Prepared by: Marie Darling, Planning Director Review Deadline: March 26, 2019 Attachments: Engineers' Memos Planning Commission Memo (12 -4 -18) Applicants Revised Narrative and Plans Correspondence Received Ordinance Resolution for Concept and Development Stage PUD Resolution for Minor Subdivision Policy Consideration: Should the City Council approve a PUD and minor subdivision at the subject property? Background: The applicant has requested a+�,,,_ PUD plan and minor subdivision of the property _ to construct two single - family homes.'' Additional background information is included in,s the attached memo to the Planning* Commission. J < ... At the January 14, 2019 meeting, the City or Council voted unanimously to continue the items to give staff additional time to review revisions. y The applicant submitted the revised plans to fR4 ' satisfy the conditions recommended by the staff and Planning Commission. At their December 4, 2018 public hearing, the Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of the application, subject to a number of conditions as outlined in the attached Planning Commission staff report. One resident spoke at the meeting in opposition to the project. His concerns included loss of open space and trees. After the meeting, the applicant revised their plans in conformance with these conditions. The substantive amendments are as follows and the revised conditions of approval are included in the attached PUD resolution: Mission Statement: The City of Shorewood is committed to providing residents quality public services, a healthy environment, a variety of attractive amenities, a sustainable tax base, and sound financial management through effective, efficient, and visionary leadership. Page 2 Tree Preservation /Landscaping: The applicant's tree inventory, preservation and landscaping plans are attached. The inventory includes a total of 25 significant trees on the property, with 13 removed and 12 saved. The applicant proposes to clear the trees from the center of the property to fit the two homes and driveways onto the lot. The condition recommended by the Planning Commission required the applicant to: 1) revise the grading, tree preservation and arborists plans to be consistent with each other and 2) submit a landscaping plan. The applicant's plans are now consistent with each other and indicate more periphery trees saved than previous plans. The applicant has submitted his landscaping plans showing seven trees planted within the property, where six are required based on its size. They proposed to plant two maples along the north property line and four spruce and one maple near the south property line. The maples are three inches and the spruce are six feet as required by the tree preservation policy. Wetland Buffers: Although the adjacent wetland is not on the subject property, City Code requires buffers to be established when development is proposed on property within 35 feet of the wetland. The applicant has added the 35 -foot wetland buffer as required on an exhibit to demonstrate that the wetland buffer and required setback has no impact on the proposed building pads. Staff included a condition in the attached resolution that the required buffer be added to the grading plan and any surveys submitted for a building permit. Architectural Plans: The applicant has altered the front elevations to include a lap fiberboard siding to the front of the homes instead of vinyl to be more consistent with the adjacent twin homes. Staff included a condition in the attached resolution that the materials and colors of the home be consistent with the adjacent two - family homes at this time. Financial Considerations: The application fees cover the cost of reviewing the application. Fees collected as part of the subdivision include watermain connection, sanitary sewer (local connection) and park dedication. The watermain connection charge may be assessed to the property. Action Requested: Staff and the Planning Commission respectfully requests the City Council approve the application. Potential motion: Motion to approve an ordinance and resolutions for Lawtonka Villas PUD and minor subdivision located at 23825 Lawtonka Drive for Greenwood Design Build, LLC., subject to the conditions in the attached resolution, and as recommended by the Planning Commission. Page 3 A simple majority vote is required to adopt the ordinance and resolutions. Connection to Vision /Mission: Consistency in providing residents quality public services, a healthy environment, a variety of attractive amenities, a sustainable tax base, and sound financial management through effective, efficient, and visionary leadership. wsb'"' III ftim ilia induloan . T . a: Alysoin F�auske, PE, Cilty of Shorewood F�iroiii Lauira Rescoida, EIT Date: Jairmairy 18, 2019 Re: 38 11. awtoinka DrNe Wlinoir SubdiVisbin IReVie w W&B Il= iroject IN a. 013163-000 111 followling doculryx�,inits weire sulbirnlittod foir irovilow of coirnIpIllainco wiflin ilino Clity of Slinoirowood's ...o call Surfaco Wa. toir Mainagoirm.mit ll::Illaim: Sitoirm Waiter Mlainagoiryx�sinf Rolpoirt daitod November 21, 2018 Slito ll:::Illains daitod INovermolbeir 21, 2018, reviised Jainuairy 4, 2019 Coirtificaitos of Survey daitod Selpiternboir 17, 2018 aind November 12, 2018, reviised Jainuairy 6, 2019 11 his irevliasaww only Iii ncluckA (lino docurnoinits Illsitod albovo, 1piriiirna aridly ck.�allling wiflin giradling, rnock.flling aind flino siturrywaitoir n iris aitive Updaitod coirnirnoinits airo shown !!in Ibolld 1 11 his property !is wiflinlin flino Slip oirollaind Disfiricit ll:::Ioir Secifloin 1201 03 of flino zoinling code, iline irnaxilirnurn irnpoirvious covoirago !is 25% 11 ho proposed iiirnpmarirviious airea differs Iboitwwa.oi n Hiroo Coirtificaito of Survoy aind dine Sitoi-irnwaitoir Rolpoirt Verify flino conrecit liirmo1poirvliousw airoas Bas (A oin ilino airoas !!in flino Sitoirrywaitoir Rolpoirt, ilino proposed iiirmo1poirviianans over Hiroo whollo slito !is 27% 2 ll::::oir slinglo fairnilly lnoiryx, s, flino Clity of Shorewood does nof iroquiliiro froafirneinit of sitoi-irn waiter to NLJI:Rl::l guldellinos Raithoir, flino albsibracifloin of of no lii nclin of iralli nfaIll from ilino nof now liirmo1lnoirvliousw airoa of ilino slito !is i Bocause fine slite solills airo nof coinducivo to lii nfiltirafloin, filtiraitloin of oino lii nclin of ira lli nfaIll fli 'dine nof now impoirvious airea !is accolpitalblo Noito ilinaf ilino curi-oinit des igin excoods flinis ira quiliroirnoinit 111he proposed flilitiratlioin Ibaas liin imeets the volluime cointiroll requlireimeints,. 3 11 ho proposed iraai noff Ira ate !!in flino 1 you it evoinit Oxcoeds exisifing 11 ilowovoir, fine pirolpos(A iii nciroase !is 0 1 cfs aind is coinsidoirod nogligilblo Noito ilinaf updaites i irollla iced to coirnirnoinit 2 irnay clinaingo Hiroo proposed Irani noff Ira tes. 111he rate cointiroll reqUireimeinil. is coinslideired satlisiflied vvlitlh the curreint desligim. 4 Verify iline irnlinlirnurn plainfling irnodla delpflin 111 d1irm.mSioln of deitaill 7, shoof C4 0, Iii ndicaites 12 lii nclinos whille fine noito iii ndicaites 24 iii nclines 5 11 ho proposed Ilow floor ellovaboins differ Iboitwwooi n Hiroo Coirtificaito of Survoy aind flino Slito ll:Illain (slineof C2 0) ININille ellevatlioins stlilill dliff eir, stormwateir requlireimeints acre: met us liing 1.11 e 1lwnnu eir of 1.11 e two ellevatlioins,. 14.A01 31 093 000\VVR\1...A,,rka Ld Sp I ft\2rid SWir,ttaR2M?S Lawhwka Dr a nag R-- Mcmnu..20 190 1 1 E1 d- WSI'J= Memorandum To: Marie Darling, Shorewood City Planner From: Alyson Fauske, PE, City Engineer Date: January 28, 2019 Re: 23825 Lawtonka Drive Minor Subdivision Review WSB Project No. 013163 -000 This review is based on the following documents: - Certificate of Survey dated January 9, 2019 - Grading Plan dated January 4, 2019 1. The applicant proposes to mass -grade the site to accommodate the building pads and the surface water management feature. 2. There is a "pond" which straddles the northern property line of Parcel A and extends onto the property to the north. It appears to be an amenity to the property to the north versus a storm water management feature. Based on the proposed grading plan the portion of the "pond" on Parcel A is to be removed and the portion on the property to the north will remain. If this is not the case, update the grading plan to reflect the proposed grading on the property to the north and obtain permission from the property owner to the north for any off -site grading and appurtenant erosion and sediment control devices. 3. Provide elevation data on the property to the north of Parcel A and ensure that the drainage from Parcel A will be conveyed along the common property line and not directed to the home to the north. 4. Sanitary sewer and watermain are within Lawtonka Drive adjacent to the property. Based on the utility as -built information available, one sanitary sewer service is available to the subdivision. Water services do not appear to be available. A work in right of way permit will be required for any necessary sanitary sewer and water service installation. The work must be done by a contractor that has registered with the city to perform work within the right of way. K. A10 13163 0 00AAdmin I1 r '8761 Lawtonka (via^w 20 '19 0 '1 28 dorx CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 Country Club Road • Shorewood, Minnesota 55331 • 952- 960 -7900 Fax: 952- 474 -0128 • www.ci.shorewood.nmus • cityhall @ci.shorewood.mn.us MEMORANDUM TO: Planning Commission, Mayor and City Council FROM: Marie Darling, Planning Director Reviewed by: Patti Helgesen, Assistant Planner MEETING DATE: December 4, 2018 RE: PUD and Minor subdivision for " Lawtonka Villas" APPLICANT: Greenwood Design Build LOCATION: 23825 Lawtonka Drive REVIEW DEADLINE: March 26, 2019 ZONING: PUD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: FILE NO.: 18.22 REQUEST Low to Medium Density Residential (2 -3 units per acre) The applicant proposes to subdivide the subject property into two lots and construct two new homes. BACKGROUND Context: The property was created in 1988 as part of the Lawtonka subdivision. After the plat was recorded, all the lots along Lawtonka Drive were rezoned to PUD and all the other lots were developed with the Gideon Cove subdivision (twinhomes) in 1992. For this appheatio , Me property was specifically removed from the Gideon Cove PUD. The original subdivider of the Lawtonka subdivision owned a home on the parcel to the south and kept this property as a buffer between his home and the twinhomes. The most recent previous owner of the subject property lived in the adjacent twinhome and also used the lot as additional open space. Page 2 The property contains mature trees and is subject to tree preservation. The site has no property within a floodplain overlay district, but is adjacent to a wetland and within the shoreland overlay district for Lake Minnetonka. ANALYSIS Planned Unit Development (PUD) Section 1201.25 defines a PUD as a flexible development tool to provide for a mix of residential types and create a more desirable environment than would be possible through the strict application of zoning and subdivision regulations. It also indicates PUDs are appropriate to require higher standards of site and building design and allow for variation from the provisions of this chapter, including variations to setbacks; height; lot area, width and depth; and the like. This property owner seeks to construct two new walkout homes, one on each lot. The main floor would allow for single -level living with the master bedrooms, laundry and kitchen on that floor, with guest rooms downstairs. These homes are similar to many marketed to empty- nesters, although with over 3,000 square feet and no HOA fees, the homes could appeal to a wide variety of families. The homes would be about 26 feet tall, where 35 feet is allowed by ordinance. Architectural Style The home is proposed along a street where all the other homes were built at the same time through a PUD and have a consistent style. Staff acknowledge that the homes in the neighborhood don't need to be completely the same, but find that a consistent appearance on the street would add to neighborhood cohesion. The applicant has added some gables over the garages and entry to break up the proposed large hip roof and provide some consistent design elements to the existing neighborhood. However, the hip roof is much taller than on the existing twinhomes. At a minimum, staff recommends the applicant use similar siding materials and colors. As proposed, the applicant has proposed vinyl siding, and the existing homes have wood shake siding in lap panels. Proposed Home i d Existing Homes Page 3 Site Design Grading /Tree Preservation: This site is naturally higher than the twinhomes to the north. The east side of the subject property is about four feet higher than the first floor and garage entrance of the home to the north. The applicant has proposed to regrade the entire site, removing /disturbing all the significant trees to create a consistent first floor elevation for both of the new homes. Staff suggests using some retaining walls to maintain the existing grades and save additional trees on the property. For example, four conifers and a maple shown along the east property line could be saved if the existing grades are preserved through the use of retaining walls.. The applicant proposes a first floor elevation for both homes that would be about three feet higher than that of the adjacent homes. A portion of Lot A drains directly to the property to the north. As a condition of approval, staff recommends that the applicant provide more information on the existing grades on the adjacent property and /or create a new swale along the adjacent property to redirect surface water run -off away from the adjacent property. Rate of Stormwater Run -Off. Staff reviewed the storm water calculations based on the additional impervious surface coverage created by the construction of new homes on the property. The applicant has proposed a rain garden straddling the new property line. Refer to the attached Engineering Staff memos. Subject to the review comments, the applicant's proposal would be able to meet the city's requirements for rate control. Wetland: The wetland to the west of the property is in close enough proximity that the applicant must place wetland buffers on the property. The applicant is required to provide a 35 -foot buffer and protect it with conservation easements. All structures must be setback 15 feet from the wetland buffer. Although the applicant does not currently show the wetland buffer and setback on the plans, neither are likely to complicate house construction. Staff recommends a condition that the applicant revise the plans to show the delineated edge of the wetland and the wetland buffer on the plans. Parcel and Dwelling Layout: Typically, the PUD is based on the underlying zoning district and flexibility from the required standards is defined. The remaining homes on Lawtonka Drive are part of the adjacent PUD and staff used these standards as the basis to review the proposed development. Staff began review of this PUD application based on the standards of the Gideon Cove PUD, that information and the applicant's proposed setbacks are shown in the following table. Staff also included a column for language to be included in the PUD development agreement. Lot Area Base Lot /Unit Lot Design As Shown On Plan 14,544 14,183 Lot Width ±44 ft. ±37 ft. Setbacks Front 20 ft. 30 ft. 42 ft. 42 ft. Interior Side (between A and B) NA 5 ft. (10 ft.) 5 ft. (10 ft.) 5 ft. (10 ft.) Exterior Side 10 ft. 10 ft. 10 ft. 10 ft. Rear 40 ft. 40 ft. 51.8 ft. 55.3 Impervious Surface Coverage NA 25% 25% 25 Page 4 Landscaping: The applicant has not submitted a landscaping plan at this time. Three trees would be required for each lot based on the tree removal proposed and the size of the property. Utilities: The lots have access to both municipal sewer and water and both would be required for the new homes. A right -of -way permit issued by the City of Shorewood would be required to install services. Minor Subdivision: Easements: Section 1202.05 Subd. 6 requires standard 10 -foot drainage and utility easements around the periphery of each lot. The easements around the periphery of the property were dedicated with the Lawtonka subdivision. A five foot drainage and utility easement should also be provided along both sides of the new property line. Access /Lot Frontage: Section 1202.05 Subd. 2. c. requires that every lot have adequate frontage on a city approved street to accommodate a driveway. The property is at the end of a cul -de -sac and both lots would provide an adequate amount of lot width to construct a conforming driveway consistent with setbacks as long as the driveway is shared as it approaches the street. Private driveway easements would be required to minimize disputes regarding maintenance, prohibit blocking and provide for dispute resolution. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the PUD and minor subdivision based on the finding that the development would be similar to the existing neighborhood, with the following conditions: • Prior to recording the subdivision, the applicant shall complete /submit the following: a. Submit executed drainage and utility easements, covenants for care of the shared rain garden, a private driveway easement and a conservation easement over the wetland buffer. The applicant may also submit an HOA in lieu of driveway and conservation easements and the maintenance covenants. b. Submit fees for park dedication and local sanitary sewer and water access charges. c. Remove all structures from the property. d. Revise the plans as indicated by the Engineer's memos. e. Revise the plans to correctly indicate the wetland and the wetland buffer on the plans. f. Revise the plans for consistency between grading, tree preservation and house elevations. g. Submit a landscaping plan. h. Revise the plans to indicate the materials and colors proposed for the homes, which would be consistent with the other homes on the street. • Other conditions: a. Prior to construction of improvements on either lot, the applicant shall acquire the appropriate permits. All construction must be consistent with the requirements of City Code. b. The surveys submitted for permit must include all cantilevers. C. Prior to installing services or conducting other work in the right -of -way, obtain a right - of -way permit. d. Both homes shall be connected to municipal water. Page 5 ATTACHMENTS Location map Applicant's narrative and plans Engineer's memos SAPlaming\Pla ing Files \Appliegions\2018 CasesV —tonka MS PUD\PC memo.d- i c r To: City of Shorewood Re: Narrative for Minor Subdivision / Lot Split for 23825 Lawtonka Date: 01/07/19 Proposed development to be named Lawtonka Villas. Greenwood Design Build, LLC 5555 West 78th St, Suite L, Edina, MN 55439 Phone: (952) 217 -4156 www.greenwooddesignbuild.com MN Lic# BC629846 GreenWood is proposing to take the single lot with an address of 23825 Lawtonka that is shown on the comprehensive plan, and zoning map as a PUD, and convert it to 2 separate conforming villa lots to stay in line to the existing ones that are currently in the neighborhood. GreenWood's proposed villa homes will be designed in order to be sensitive to the existing architecture of the twin homes within this development. The new villa homes will be one story, and will use similar materials and level of finish as the existing twin homes. We do not propose or intent to record any restrictive covenants with the new villa homes. Our intent would be to begin construction as soon as reasonably possible beginning in 2019, and would be under construction for approximately 6 months on the first residence. Thank you for your consideration of our application. Sincerely, Doug Cutting, Vice President GreenWood Design Build, LLC ADDRESS: 23825 LAWTONKA DRIVE O O ti O O If) M O O Z r FAIIIIII EXISTING HOUSE �N89° 3'31.`E )'150.00 POND - =' F 5N!1/9 ( { O'F �ROP LIN[ � � r / I � SHE I - LOT LOCK 1,j m� �Erac u {� t _- FENCE IS 2.0W ( z OF PROP LINV J X111 \. rENC'15 ON CE 1 110 OF POP LINE -� - 7 __ ,�— C !'— DRAINAGE UTILITY r, -' j p O EASEMENT S89013'31 "W 150.00 • I -, Surveying & Associates 31432 Foliage Avenue 1682 Cliff Road E. Northfield, MN 55057 Burnsville, MN 55337 Phone: (507) 645-7768 Phone: (952) 895-9212 tomeara @bohlensurveying.com Fax: (952) 895 -9259 / – – – – BENCH–MARK.- FIRE HYDRANT, TNH ELEV, = 958.51 i �'SN6o °o °° pR wroNk9 �O _ z . Io _ �• Fs. f<<,.'Co. }1� LLI G zl _7 1 LOT AREA = 28,728 SQ. FT. HOUSE AREA = SQ. FT. NOTE.- ALL BUILDING DIMENSIONS ARE SHOWN TO OUTSIDE OF FOUNDATION WALL QM DENOTES MAILBOX O DENOTES IRON PIPE MONUMENT SET DENOTES FOUND IRON PIPE MONUMENT �— DENOTES PROPOSED DRAINAGE DIRECTION DENOTES SERVICE LOCATION DENOTES WOOD HUB 000.0 DENOTES EXISTING ELEVATION 000.0 DENOTES PROPOSED ELEVATION I OO,p,— DENOTES EXISTING CONTOUR DENOTES PROPOSED CONTOUR DENOTES DECIDUOUS TREE DENOTES EVERGREEN TREE DENOTES BITUMINOUS SURFACE DENOTES CONCRETE SURFACE DENOTES GRAVEL SURFACE DUPLEX SETBACK INFORMATION: FRONT - 20' SIDE YARD - 10' SIDE YARD - 20' BETWEEN BLDGS REAR YARD - 40' PROPOSED TOP OF WALL ELEV. _ PROPOSED GARAGE FLOOR ELEV. _ PROPOSED BASEMENT FLOOR ELEV. _ PROPERTY DESCRIPTION LOT 6, BLOCK 1, LAWTONKA, CITY OF SHOREWOOD, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA. ' s I I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SURVEY WAS PREPARED BY ME OR j UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. Z: \S \Company Shared \Projects\ForestLake \chestnut- creek \dwg\L26Bl.dwg DATE: 9 -17 -2018 Tharlou 1 UI IJK.C1/1 L THOMAS J. O'MEARA, LAND SURVEYOR MINNESOTA LICENSE NO, 46167 ADDU-SS: 23825 LAWTONKA DIUVE CERTIFICATE OF SURVEYFORGREENWOOD DESIGN BUILD, LAZ QM DENOTES MAILBOX BENCH EXISTING house — — MARK.' 0 DENOTES IRON PIPE MONUMENT SET PARCEL A AREA = 14,544 SQ. FT I r/ / K \ \ % FIRE HYDRANT, TNH ELEV. 958.51 0 DENOTES FOUND IRON PIPE MONUMENT HOUSE AREA = 2,295 SQ. FT PORCH AREA = 168 SQ. FT. �I / I I 1 — DENOTES PROPOSED DRAINAGE DIRECTION SIDEWALK = 101 SQ. FT. l/ I DENOTES SERVICE LOCATION SCREEN PORCH = 180 SQ. FT. 11 ' N DRIVEWAY = e88 SO. Fr / /IN89-13 - 31 E �� t150.0 0 )" � r � O p � o DENOTES WOOD HUB / �� POND %(I �r lr l� IMPERVIOUS = 3,632 SQ. FT _ ��L L ®L � �. " ,� �� °� ��% 000.0 DENOTES EXISTING ELEVATION = 24.979 1,z s 34< < > �" �, ; 11 , =� 6 O �t �Y f / � ��o �� t �/' , �� >� T t o �2 �� 'N R��F 000.0 DENOTES PROPOSED ELEVATION _ R ID 2 ;�� " T01 i 5 /d.., 17 N. 1 I l 1 { , °�_._ �` �/� ,r x V qP, fop DENOTES EXISTING CONTOUR C �, Tk' m 202 i`` •; , T 'fD d3 AZEF�O i t O 4 V c�< / co SF� �O� SIDEWALK o / �J� NC "CF -F� ppp W •, u 1 0ll �/ e�o��ya9� 50 cU�RFrF R �— DENOTES PROPOSED CONTOUR I O i" �^� h J ` O m� '11 0 ( J'hl� 1 „� O , �, A r' 4 y �� C�jRB r� ab''q�r o >” JJJ�.2 ` , DENOTES DECIDUOUS TREE I III // I.1 1 //'6 \ ! 11 � / °� 30' N ,. v; z�rB ID 2061 I� n ({ fl /� �a'4,1 / s -�; 6 _ W �, „ PRO OS D TR 2 "o q 6 "" a2 ,p o�FS ''� _ DENOTES EVERGREEN TREE - w I H�ouSE� GAAGE , , I''�I , .ti� si' �° _ PROPOSED PARCEL A TRID20 �,; Ifj7 ,/ _... �. F /WO r ' 'I '� I �' DENOTES DECIDUOUS TREE WITH TREE TAG , ^`9r ' LOT 6, BLOCK 1, LAWTONKA, CITY OF SHOREWOOD, TR ID 000 s C.o s, 4 F V� 3?� .? J TR2Iq ° HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA LYING ,. IIIiI a0 1 _ ,/- NORTHWESTERLY OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED TR ID 000 DENOTES EVERGREEN TREE WITH TREE TAG ' 5 �j o r „ LINES• COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER t Q s ti b ,l gr PARCEL BARER = 14, 183 SQ. FT i l l; 20� ( m' �o ;�� I ° i,il'12�` 32 \ \ x OF SAID LOT 6; THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 35 TR ID 000 xx DENOTES DECIDUOUS TREE TO BE REMOVED I � oil) I o ��li'''� 6 G' GE ;i MINUTES 00 SECONDS EAST ALONG THE WEST LINE, (. • p� n dill Il.olllll �� ) Ih. HOUSE AREA = 2,295 SQ. FT p ` oai �� - �\ �' S to �Q ' OF SAID LOT 6, A DISTANCE OF 179.00 FEET TO THE p ( ,% \I C� n oQ TR ID 000 DENOTES EVERGREEN TREE TO BE REMOVED PORCH AREA = 168 SQ. FT •I C L t \ s l._ - o SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 6 AND THE POINT X SIDEWALK = 101 SQ. FT / J \ ' �� \ II OF BEGINNING OF THE LINES TO BE DESCRIBED; NORTH38DE SCREEN PORCH = 180 SQ. FT 7 THENCE DEGREES 31 MINUTES 04 SECONDS DENOTES BITUMINOUS SURFACE „, DRIVEWAY = 794 SQ. FT. LLI R1.r� 2U9 (\ \� \ / I 's o s'° Q-0 00 EAST, A DISTANCE OF 113.49 FEET; THENCE NORTH 51 ` ° 4, F DEGREES 16 MINUTES 27 SECONDS EAST A DISTANCE c L �� !� t� -, .,� o S� P� ID 217 - y C:) ,' ��) b e— G OF 112.86 FEET TO THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF IMPERVIOUS = 3,538 SQ. FT. p ". s V _ _ ,� DENOTES CONCRETE SURFACE = 24.949 Z'`IG' I� \ �ROPOSED ° ' w SAID LOT 6 AND THERE TERMINATING. l SNE lti �. �� R .223 TOGETHER WITH AN EASEMENT FOR DRAINAGE & M �TR {DZOS }} �_,� �� . �s�o s�� HOUSE i�I' CD ,. I J I ,, \/ „ \ \ i��pF� FB/WO �q ,�Z UTILITY PURPOSES OVER AND ACROSS THE DENOTES GRAVEL SURFACE ROPOSE� - - -- �' 1 �.o ho _ °_ SOUTHEAST RLY 5.0 FEET OF THE ABOVE E DRAINAGE 4 uTiuT �� t I ll u b G.- J �0 DESCRIBED PROPERTY. 1 �,Rs -- t 3 0 -_ l� �EAE�ENT !� ��' �'�, I - J \1 I � >� L(I)TI ( � _( �� /��` �� ' = �1 PROPOSED PARCEL A, CONSERVATION EASEMENT DUPLEX SETBACK INFORMATION: I „ �,: A CONSERVATION EASEMENT OVER AND ACROSS THAT PART OF LOT 6, BLOCK 1 C �) B��C�� 1 I ) 1 LAWTONKA CITY OF SHOREWOOD HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA DESCRIBED AS FRONT - 20 (l %, tai l I r Al FOLLOWS: / �e� �� " K 1 ) BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 6, THENCE SOUTH 00 - 0' SIDE YARD 1 ID c . DEGREES 35 MINUTES 00 SECONDS EAST, ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 6, jo o / ( /P CEL B I \ "` A DISTANCE OF 74.78 FEET; THENCE NORTH 35 DEGREES40 MINUTES 45 SECONDS SIDE YARD - 20 BETWEEN BLDGS w� ' ( 1 l �� EAST, A DISTANCE OF 17.93 FEET; THENCE NORTH 7 DEGREES 20 MINUTES 54 ' j �� SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF 18.55 FEET; THENCE NORTH 16 DEGREES 08 MINUTES REAR YARD - 40 ' �i I �1 / {� / FENCE IS UN Ror �I'u� -= 33 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF 25.38 FEET; THENCE NORTH 14 DEGREES 46 FENC is I . I N J / i ' r MINUTES 24 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF 18.38 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 6; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 13 MINUTES 31 SECONDS WEST, ALONG SAID OF PROP LINE �I � I NORTH LINE A DISTANCE OF 25.34 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. o� DRAiNAaE UTILITY - -- ; V = 960.3 - -- EASEMENT " f i — PROPOSED GARAGE FLOOR ELEV, = 960.0 PROPOSED BASEMENT FLOOR ELEV. = 951.6 S89 013'31 "W 150.00 EXISTING PROPERTY DESCRIPTION ?LOT 6, BLOCK 1, LAWTONKA, CITY OF SHORE,WOOD, � PROPOSED PARCEL B iHENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA. LOT 6, BLOCK 1, LAWTONKA, CITY OF SHOREWOOD, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA LYING SOUTHEASTERLY OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LINES; COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 6; THENCE SOUTH QO)" ,I't I Bohlen DEGREES 35 MINUTES 00 SECONDS EAST, ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 6, A DISTANCE OF 179.00 FEET TO THE 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SURVEY WAS PREPARED BY ME OR SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 6 AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE LINES TO BE DESCRIBED; THENCE UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED Surveying & Associates NORTH 38 DEGREES 31 MINUTES 04 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF 113.49 FEET; THENCE NORTH 51 DEGREES 16 ssoc MINUTES 27 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF 112.86 FEET TO THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 6 AND THERE LAND SURVEYOR UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 31432 Foliage Avenue 1682 Cliff Road E. TERMINATING. Th - M Northfield, MN 55057 Burnsville, MN 55337 TOGETHER WITH AN EASEMENT FOR DRAINAGE & UTLITY PURPOSES OVER AND ACROSS THE NORTHWESTERLY 5.0 DATE: 10 -23 -2018 I wf �° �I t/� -u/� Phone: (507) 645 -7768 A Phone: (952) 895 -9212 FEET OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY. REVISED: 1 -9 -2019 THOMAS J. O'MEARA, LAND SURVEYOR tomeara @bohlensurveying.com Fax: (952) 895 -9259 NOTE.- ALL BUILDING DIMENSIONS ARE SHOWN TO OUTS /DE OF FOUNDATION WALL MINNESOTA LICENSE NO, 46167 S:\Projects\shorewood\LAWTONKA-ADDITION\dwg\L6BI - SPLIT- 11- 8- 18.d-,vg -- i�;'' - M CONSTRUCTION UNITS / r - j I • ♦♦ ♦fit bBb ®' ' ® m ®® r m ® ® ®® ® ®m ®® •♦ \I ®- a mm ®® ®® ® ® ®® ®m ®mom ®�� to, ® m ® o ® `REMOVE EXISTING POND, -/ III\\ :III \,',�,� �i � _S v f l - �:fOi® P ♦0. / ®i i r I ,�_I � s / ': �\\ ` PIPES, ROCKS, AND DASE '�, MATERIALS. COORD'N WITH 1-c' - ,� I ISTINGTREES TO I I - -1 - V /. �f ADJACENT.PROPERTYi I I I /I,tEhAN, PROVIDE I d1 ; I \ � / 1 OWNER FOR REMOVAL. \ C � j < << /__ \v � L r /, -� t I iiREE PROTECTION V / � \ � J :I I ;111,,r1 NCING,TYPI I ( �l % REMOVE EX BUILDING, STRUCTURE / FOUNDATIONS, FOOTINGS 8 BASE ♦ ♦ ♦�� -ff '� I I I MATERIALS, PER LOCAL STATE & FEDERAL 1 \ /ALt - A' i♦ \Ih. :a "/ I I - I ,' � SERVICES ANDOR L.S UESTTILITY S ® ® STANDARDS, REMOVFJDISCONNECTALL I � � 9 ♦ /- / 'Vv ff �i • 1 / v �i r REh90VE EXISTING TREE AND BALL ROOT, TYP. i 1; 1 1 Q r f 1 00o'._J , 1 r I ' ■ -♦� I '=� I ALL TREES SHOWN TO SE �iTf -,1 .<il` -y;•__ I i I PROTECTED SHALL BE REPLACED \ .. _ /�, "q'\ -.� li II / ,,. ! \\ �' .I • h"I'!c\ f ♦ ♦.II +�� ♦. I IN KIND IN LOCATION IF DISTURBED i 1 PAST E POINT OF PROTECTION. / l r Tj / \ y <, _, I A- V COORQ'ti WITH CITY ARBORIST., A - :A "./ 3� I f/ s,• A.,. REMOVE EXISTING J, PAVEMENT AND BASE MATERIAL AND J 1 I '\ / it � ♦♦ ♦�\ /U♦,:; I PARKING SIGNS, TYP. �I II i, I ' j i// \ \.1 // �i , I 11 I \\ ®I, ,,�� ir1 "� ♦� j 4, �I - • 7 \ I 3 (j ; �'��♦ Y %° z }: / / \ REMOVE EXIST[NO TREE _ i AND BA" ROOT, TYP. 4 \ � REPROVE E I � �� AND BALL XISTING ROO TREE T,TYP. / 1 \ 1 — \ t r I I r1 REMOVE EX BUILDING: STRUCTURES, FOYNDATIONS, FOOTINGS & BASE III , MATERIALS, PER LOCAL STATE & FEDERAL I STANDARDS. REh90VElPISCONNECT ALL SERVICES & UTILITIES PER UTILITY / I III COMPANY ANDIOR L.G.U. STANDARDS jll" I / /,Lror, � (' / /`� .� 1 li � /�� i ��I I'1 II I I `�♦ w �•= CONSTRUCTION UMITB J� _ / /I� _- I - �1_I _- .. _�_ �� - - 1- ! ♦ ♦fA.O� _ CONSTRUCT] LIMITS r 1 I I ,f II. ♦♦_ I 00 1 / / 0 I J# �= o CITY OF SHOREWOOD REMOVAL NOTES: 1. RESERVED FOR CITY SPECIFIC REMOVAL NOTES. CITY OF SHOREWOOD EROSION CONTROL NOTES: 1. RESERVED FOR CITY SPECIFIC EROSION CONTROL NOTES. SWPPP NOTES: 1. THIS PROJECT IS LESS THAN ONE ACRE AND WILL NOT REQUIRE AN MPCA NPDES PERMIT. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING ANY EROSION CONTROL PERMITS REQUIRED BY THE CITY. 2. SEE GRADING PLAN FOR ADDITIONAL GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL NOTES. 3. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR SWPPP IMPLEMENTATION, INSPECTIONS, AND COMPLIANCE WITH NPDES PERMIT. REMOVAL NOTES: 1. SEE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) PLAN FOR CONSTRUCTION STORM WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN. 2. REMOVAL OF MATERIALS NOTED ON THE DRAWINGS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH MNDOT, STATE AND LOCAL REGULATIONS 3. REMOVAL OF PRIVATE UTILITIES SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH UTILITY OWNER PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. 4. EXISTING PAVEMENTS SHALL BE SAWCUT IN LOCATIONS AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS OR THE NEAREST JOINT FOR PROPOSED PAVEMENT CONNECTIONS. 5. REMOVED MATERIALS SHALL BE DISPOSED OF TO A LEGAL OFFSITE LOCATION AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH STATE AND LOCAL REGULATIONS. 6. ABANDON REMOVAL CONNECTION, AND PROTECTION NOTES SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS ARE APPROXIMATE. COORDINATE WITH PROPOSED PLANS. 7. EXISTING ON-SITE FEATURES NOT NOTED FOR REMOVAL SHALL BE PROTECTED THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE CONTRACT 8. PROPERTY LINES SHALL BE CONSIDERED GENERAL CONSTRUCTION LIMITS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON THE DRAWINGS. WORK WITHIN THE GENERAL CONSTRUCTION LIMITS SHALL INCLUDE STAGING, DEMOLITION AND CLEAN -UP OPERATIONS AS WELL AS CONSTRUCTION SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS. 9. MINOR WORK OUTSIDE OF THE GENERAL CONSTRUCTION LIMITS SHALL BE ALLOWED AS SHOWN ON THE PLAN AND PER CITY REQUIREMENTS. 10. DAMAGE BEYOND THE PROPERTY LIMITS CAUSED BY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY SHALL BE REPAIRED IN MANNER APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OR IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY. 11, PROPOSED WORK (BUILDING AND CIVIL) SHALL NOT DISTURB EXISTING UTILITIES UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS AND APPROVED BY THE CITY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 12. SITE SECURITY MAY BE NECESSARY AND PROVIDED 1.4 A MANNER TO PROHIBIT VANDALISM, AND THEFT, DURING AND AFTER NORMAL WORK HOURS, THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE CONTRACT, SECURITY MATERIALS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY. 13. VEHICULAR ACCESS TO THE SITE SHALL BE MAINTAINED FOR DELIVERY AND INSPECTION ACCESS DURING NOPAIAL OPERATING HOURS. AT NO POINT THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE CONTRACT SHALL CIRCULATION OF ADJACENT STREETS BE BLOCKED WITHOUT APPROVAL BY THE CITY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. 14, ALL TRAFFIC CONTROLS I 0 SHALL BE PROVIDED AND ESTABLISHED PER E E TH REQUIREMENTS OF THE MINNESOTA MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (MMUTCD) AND THE CITY, THIS SHALL INCLUDE, BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO, SIGNAGE, BARRICADES, FLASHERS, AND FLAGGERS AS NEEDED. ALL PUBLIC STREETS SHALL REMAIN OPEN TO TRAFFIC AT ALL TIMES. NO ROAD CLOSURES SHALL BE PERMITTED WITHOUT APPROVAL BY THE CITY. 15. SHORING FOR BUILDING EXCAVATION MAY BE USED AT THE DISCRETION OF THE CONTRACTOR AND AS APPROVED BY THE OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE AND THE CITY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION ACTMTIES. 16, STAGING, DEMOLITION, AND CLEAN-UP AREAS SHALL BE WITHIN THE PROPERTY LIMITS AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS AND MAINTAINED IN A MANNER AS REQUIRED BY THE CITY. EROSION LEGEND: - - - - - -- 1125 - - - - -- EX. ,'CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVAL 1137 1.0 CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVAL - DRAINAGEARROW .................... SILTFENCE /BIOROLL - GRADING LIMIT I]"a, INN F�� STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE tt�P 0 N -,. ; � r � ( D 1 A IA / t I i - I- 1 I I = L- LL_Li_G.J EROSION CONTROL BLANKET REMOVALS LEGEND: 1125 EX. 1' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVAL REMOVAL OF PAVEMENT AND ALL BASE MATERIAL, 'll /�O I, = / .� t )) I�r 1 it _ - Mr ff/11 ► ♦♦ ' - Y ' p „< ,.. ,. + .- ,. f'LC INCLUDING BIT., CONC., AND GRAVEL PVMTS. REMOVAL OF STRUCTURE INCLUDING ALL FOOTINGS AND FOUNDATIONS, U ETREE 0 N - ( D 1 A IA / t I i - I- 1 I I = REMAIN, PRO OVIDE VIDE 1 1 1 LI 1 1 -.1 REMOVE CURB AND GUTTER. IF IN RIGHT -OF -WAY, - -- -� J I..IL i /_- PROP TECTION i F Ik ENG ,7VP. ! I _ COORDINATE WITH LOCAL GO VERNING UNIT. TREE PROTECTION Z W (I / - ®m `. mam- m ® ®�® m m m® m®® m m m ®® m® - � ®m mm �m ® o -� �• O W o m m - _ - -' ' . m® m m m o ®® _ _ • _ LU 0 TREE REMOVAL - INC DING ROOTS AND STUMPS 0 1n a J01 o -m o J I L0 Know where belOW. - r - 1o'-a° N w� 00 Call before you dig, w1.0 LO W w N 0 a s-o wile G R ® U P CF,.I Fiy'- y SrvayngLarOSCapa Arch'IZRUre 4931 W Mt h S0eet. S, to 200 St. L,,.1 Puk NAN 55,116 Cmhd,,gro p com 612415-0060 ri® U 0 N J LO Z Z M M MM W Q z Ln to Z W 0 Z ~ O W o w� 1n a o -m o J 3� t` L0 Z N w� 00 w1.0 LO W w N 0 a I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF M1II NESOTA. M1a ew R. ek NATE 01 104/19 u—st, No. 44263 ISSUE /SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DRAWNBYWB NOD REVIEIVEDBY.PJS PROJECTNUMBER: 18312 REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION REMOVALS PLAN & EXISTING EROSION C1.0 CITY OF SHOREWOOD UTILITY NOTES: 1. RESERVED FOR CITY SPECIFIC UTILITY NOTES. CONSTRUCTION LIM7iTT ®� ® PROPERTY LINE ® ®® 1 T EXISTING CON� ERIBBON M( CURBBGUTER ®� . ) 3 I C TY OF SHOREWOOD SITE SPECIFIC NOTES: e. DRAINAGE B UTILITY 1. RESERVED FOR CITY SPECIFIC NOTES. I EASEMENT LINE \ 1 _r \ X11 III / ellctrKe rpNq SITE LAYOUT NOTES: BUILDING COLUMNS CONCRETE SIDEWALK /� /f ITYP> ® ®� 'i = ' \, �l / / / /,;� 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY LOCATIONS AND LAYOUT OF ALL SITE ELEMENTS PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, LOCATIONS OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED PROPERTY LINES, / �/ • EASEMENTS, SETBACKS, UTILITIES, BUILDINGS AND PAVEMENTS. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR FINAL CONCRETE STEPS, /� �� 1/ LOCATIONS OF ALL ELEMENTS FOR THE SITE. ANY REVISIONS REQUIRED AFTER COMMENCEMENT OF 1 1111, 51'8 I (3) RISERS. / / / -' 1 / CONSTRUCTION, DUE TO LOCATIONAL ADJUSTMENTS SHALL BE CORRECTED AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO OWNER. ADJUSTMENTSTO THE LAYOUTSHALL REAPPROVED BY THE ENGINEERMNDSCAPE ARCHITECT 0 1 - PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF MATERIALS. STAKE LAYOUT FOR APPROVAL. 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN ALL NECESSARY PERMITS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, INCLUDING A l �, `,, 1 i I (f� ,� '1 RIGHT- OF- WAYANO STREET OPENINGPERMIT. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY RECOMMENDATIONS NOTED IN THE GEO TECHNICAL REPORT PRIOR TO ® a R INSTALLATION BIT. DRIVEWAY APRON OF SITE IMPROVEMENT PATERALS. CONCRETE PATIO PER CITY STANDARDS, 0 TYP 4, CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELOVERIFY COORDINATES AND LOCATION DIMENSIONS OF THE BUILDING AND STAKE •' I FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BYTHE OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE PRIORTO INSTALLATION OF FOOTING MATERIALS. ®00 5. LOCATIONS OF STRUCTURES ROADWAY PAVEMENTS, CURBS AND GUTTERS, BOLLARDS, AND WALKS ARE 'I I, \ RETAINING - ® APPROXIMATE AND SHALL BE STAKED IN THE FIELD, PRIOR TO INSTALLATION, FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY WALL TYP \\ \II�� THE ENGINEERLANDSCAPEARCHI7ECT. 6. CURB DIMENSIONS SHOWNARETO FACEOF CURB. BUILDING DIMENSIONSARETO FACEOF CONCRETE 'I I �},. FOUNDATION. LOCATION OF BUILDING IS TO BUILDING FOUNDATION AND SHALL SEAS SHOWN ON THE / 'TI , 1 % /I� DRAWINGS, POST FOR SCREEN \ PORCHABOVE, SEE 7 7. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT SHOP DRAWINGS OR SAMPLES AS SPECIFIED FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL ' -- < 1A BY THE ENGINEERiLANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO FABRICATION FOR ALL PREFABRICATED SITE ARCHITECTURE FOR �`t IMPROVEMENT MATERIALS SUCH AS BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING, FURNISHINGS, PAVEMENTS, 11� � I r;,'� / ;1 l p , DETAILS. J / CONCRETE SIDEWALK WALLS, RAILINGS, BENCHES, FLAGPOLES, LANDING PADS FOR CURB RAMPS, AND LIGHT AND POLES. THE 8100, R160 OWNER RESERVES THE RIGHT TO REJECT INSTALLED MATERIALS NOT PREVIOUSLY APPROVED, 8. PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMPS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITH TRUNCATED DOME LANDING AREAS IN ACCORDANCE WITH A.DA. REQUIREMENTS -SEE DETAIL. I BUILDING OVERHANG / / .T \ Vl _�� / CONCRETE STEPS, hp m I - -- ,\ - 9. CROSSWALK STRIPING SHALL BE 24 °WIDE WHITE PAINTED LINE, SPACED 48- ON CENTER PERPENDICULAR TO (3) RISERS. p ®� r% I , , t' THE FLOW OFTRAFFIC. WIDTH OF CROSSWALK SHALL BE F WIDE. ALL OTHER PAVEMENT MARKINGS SHALL BE EOF= 943.60 / I / / / ,I WHITE IN COLOR UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED OR REQUIRED BYADA OR LOCAL GOVERNING BODIES. PROPOSED LOT SPLIT I I /. / PROPERTY LINE / / / ® ®�' P ( {� } 10. SEE SITE PLAN FOR CURB AND GUTTER TYPE. TAPER BETWEEN CURB TYPES-SEE DETAIL. 11. ALL CURB RADII ARE MINIMUM T UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. BUILDING COLUMNS ) ♦ � 1 12. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO FINAL PLAT FOR LOT BOUNDARIES, NUMBERS, AREAS ANDDIP,IENSIONS PRIOR TO SITE IMPROVEMENTS. 13. FIELD VERIFY ALL EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS , DIMENSIONS. pp ggqq CONCRETE PATIO i t ' 14. PARKING IS TO BE SET PARALLEL OR PERPENDICULAR TO EXISTING BUILDING UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 15. ALL PARKING LOT PAINT STRIPPING TO BE WHITE, 4 "WIDE TYP. A\ / ` . 16. BITUMINOUS PAVING TO BE "LIGHT DUTY' UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, SEE DETAIL SHEETS FOR PAVEMENT 10' WIDE DRAINAGE 8 - - - ,i SECTIONS. UTILITY EASEMENT I { 17. ALL TREES THAT ARE TO REMAIN ARE TO BE PROTECTED FROM DAMAGE WITH A CONSTRUCTION FENCE AT THE DRIP LINE. SEE LANDSCAPE DOCUMENTS 10.5� 1 1 SITE PLAN LEGEND: CONCRETE PAVEMENT AS SPECIFIED (PAD OR WALK) SEE GEOTECHN[CAL REPORT FOR AGGREGATE BASE & CONCRETE DEPTHS, SEE DETAIL. LID T DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT. SEE GEE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR AGGREGATE BASE 8 WEAR COURSE DEPTH, SEE DEATIL. — — — PROPERTY LINE ® M M ® CONSTRUCTION LIMITS 0 OP Know what's below. Call before you dig. 10I. 51-01 0 101-01 °lLa. G R O U P CivI E,g(— ,,g-Surveyng Lu,J>capu Archletore 4931 W. 35th S—L Su to 200 ST. Louis Park, MN 55416 d Ishegroup.mm 612615-0060 0 11 �-� COQ- JG \� 00 ® POSTFORSCREEN RETAINING PORCH ABOVE, SEE WALL, TYP. I f J J M ARCHITECTURE FOR "� Q z DETAILS. 11'1 .11 I - ®� Z PROPERTY LINE �� / I � O Z W H U, O W / \. i o CONSTRUCTION LIMITS //\ 'L L N III /` j l \/ . / / �NW Of a CONSTR UCTI N LIMITS �I I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER FAY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF All 'ES0T0. Ma - R.P -,ek DATE 01/04/19 —,Fm 44263 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY PROPERTY LINE I / 40 DRAINAGE B UTILITY EASEMENT LINE �. - 1 — - — — _ II SITE PLAN LEGEND: CONCRETE PAVEMENT AS SPECIFIED (PAD OR WALK) SEE GEOTECHN[CAL REPORT FOR AGGREGATE BASE & CONCRETE DEPTHS, SEE DETAIL. LID T DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT. SEE GEE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR AGGREGATE BASE 8 WEAR COURSE DEPTH, SEE DEATIL. — — — PROPERTY LINE ® M M ® CONSTRUCTION LIMITS 0 OP Know what's below. Call before you dig. 10I. 51-01 0 101-01 °lLa. G R O U P CivI E,g(— ,,g-Surveyng Lu,J>capu Archletore 4931 W. 35th S—L Su to 200 ST. Louis Park, MN 55416 d Ishegroup.mm 612615-0060 0 11 �-� COQ- JG \� 00 DRAWN BY:VB, NOD REVIEIVED BY: PJS PROJECT NUMBER, 16312 REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION SITE PLAN C2.0 covrwcNr cn>LSrtE Caow 1.. ® U J J M Q z J LO z Z m Z O Z W H U, O W U) aW o o Ln Z N LU W� M �NW Of a I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER FAY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF All 'ES0T0. Ma - R.P -,ek DATE 01/04/19 —,Fm 44263 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DRAWN BY:VB, NOD REVIEIVED BY: PJS PROJECT NUMBER, 16312 REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION SITE PLAN C2.0 covrwcNr cn>LSrtE Caow 1.. PERIMETER EROSION CONTROLAT CONSTRUCTION LIMITS, TYP. PERIMETER EROSION CONTROL AT TOP OF RAINGARDEN, AROUND PERIMETER 941.09ME, CONSTRUCTION LIMITS -' PERIMETER EROSION CONTROLAT CONSTRUCTION LIMITS, TYP. 0.0061E — CONSTRUCTION LIMITS s I1ON LL SLORES 44 0II S EP2 [tYP + p. 7 (Mf1 IT CATEGC)(2Y 3)) GENERAL GRADING NOTES: 1. SEE SITE PLAN FOR HORIZONTAL LAYOUT & GENERAL GRACING NOTES. 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLETE THE SITE GRADING CONSTRUCTION (INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO SITE PREPARATION, SOIL CORRECTION, EXCAVATION, EMBANKMENT, ETC.) IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OWNER'S SOILS ENGINEER. ALL SOIL TESTING SHALL BE COMPLETED BY THE OWNER'S SOILS ENGINEER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING ALL REQUIRED SOIL TESTS AND INSPECTIONS WITH THE SOILS ENGINEER. 3. GRADING AND EXCAVATION ACTIVITIES SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE NATIONAL POLLUTION DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) PERMIT REQUIREMENTS & PERMIT REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY. 4. PROPOSED SPOT GRADES ARE FLOW-LINE FINISHED GRADE ELEVATIONS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, 6. GRADES OF WALKS SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH 5% M,IAX. LONGITUDINAL SLOPE AND 1% MIN. AND 2$ MAX. CROSS SLOPE, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, 6. PROPOSED SLOPES SHALL NOT EXCEED 3'1 UNLESS INDICATED OTHERWISE ON THE DRAWINGS. MAXIMUM SLOPES IN M,W NTAINED AREAS IS 4:1 7. PROPOSED RETAINING WALLS FREESTANDING WALLS, OR COMBINATION OF WALL TYPES GREATER THAN 4- IN HEIGHT SHALL BE DESIGNED AND ENGINEERED BY A REGISTERED RETAINING WALL ENGINEER. DESIGN DRAWINGS 6RALL BE SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. B. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTENANCE OF GRADE STAKES THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF CONSTRUCTION TO ESTABLISH PROPER GRADES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ALSO BE RESPONSIBLE FORA FINAL FIELD CHECK OF FINISHED GRADES ACCEPTABLE TO THE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO TOPSOIL AND SODDING ACTIVITIES. 9. IF EXCESS OR SHORTAGE OF SOIL MATERIAL EXISTS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL TRANSPORTALL EXCESS SOIL MATERIAL OFF THE SITE TO AN AREA SELECTED BY THE CONTRACTOR, OR IMPORT SUITABLE MATERIAL TO THE SITE, 10. EXCAVATE TOPSOIL FROM AREAS TO BE FURTHER EXCAVATED OR REGRADED AND STOCKPILE IN AREAS DESIGNATED ON THE SITE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SALVAGE ENOUGH TOPSOIL FOR RESPREADING ON THE SITE AS SPECIFIED. EXCESS TOPSOIL SHALL BE PLACED IN EMBANKMENT AREAS, OUTSIDE OF BUILDING PADS, ROADWAYS AND PARKING AREAS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBCUTCUT AREAS, WHERE TURF IS TO BE ESTABLISHED, TO A DEPTH OF 6 INCHES. RESPREAD TOPSOIL IN AREAS WHERE TURF IS TO BE ESTABLISHED TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 6 INCHES. 11. FINISHED GRADING SHALL BE COMPLETED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL UNIFORMLY GRADE AREAS WITHIN LIMITS OF GRADING, INCLUDING ADJACENT TRANSITION AREAS. PROVIDE A SMOOTH FINISHED SURFACE WITHIN SPECIFIED TOLERANCES, WITH UNIFORM LEVELS OR SLOPES BETWEEN POINTS WHERE ELEVATIONS ARE SHOWN, OR BETWEEN SUCH POINTS AND EXISTING GRADES. AREAS THAT HAVE BEEN FINISH GRADED SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM SUBSEQUENT CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS, TRAFFIC AND EROSION. REPAIR ALL AREAS THAT HAVE BECOME RUTTED BY TRAFFIC OR ERODED BY WATER OR HAS SETTLED BELOW THE CORRECT GRADE. ALL AREAS DISTURBED BY THE CONTRACTOR'S OPERATIONS SHALL BE RESTOREDTO EQUAL OR BETTER THAN ORIGINAL CONDITION OR TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE NEW WORK. 12. PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF THE AGGREGATE BASE, A TEST ROLL WILL BE REQUIRED ON THE STREETANDIOR PARKING AREA SUBGRADE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A LOADED TANDEM AXLE TRUCK WITH A GROSS WEIGHT OF 25 TONS. THE TEST ROLLING SHALL BE AT THE DIRECTION OF THE SOILS ENGINEER AND SHALL BE COMPLETED IN AREAS AS DIRECTED BY THE SOILS ENGINEER. THE SOILS ENGINEER SHALL DETERMINE WHICH SECTIONS OF THE STREETOR PARKING AREA ARE UNSTABLE. CORRECTION OF THE SUBGRADE SOILS SHALL BE COMPLETED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SOILS ENGINEER. NO TEST ROLL SHALL OCCUR WITHIN 10' OFANY UNDERGROUND STORM RETENTIONIDETENTION SYSTEMS. 13. TOLERANCES 13.1. THE BUILDING SUBGRADE FINISHED SURFACE ELEVATION SHALL NOT VARY BY MORE THAN 0.30 FOOT ABOVE, OR 0.30 FOOT BELOW, THE PRESCRIBED ELEVATION AT ANY POINT WHERE MEASUREMENT IS MADE. 112. THE STREET OR PARKING AREA SU8GRADE FINISHED SURFACE ELEVATION SHALL NOTVARY BY MORE THAN 0.05 FOOT ABOVE, OR 0.10 FOOT BELOW, THE PRESCRIBED ELEVATION OF ANY POINT WHERE MEASUREMENT IS MADE. 13.3. AREAS WHICH ARE TO RECEIVE TOPSOIL SHALL BE GRADED TO WITHIN 0.30 FOOTABOVE OR BELOW THE REQUIRED ELEVATION, UNLESS DIRECTED OTHERWISE BY THE ENGINEER. 13.4. TOPSOIL SHALL BE GRADED TO PLUS OR MINUS 1/2 INCH OF THE SPECIFIED THICKNESS. 14. MAINTENANCE 14.1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT NEWLY GRADED AREAS FROM TRAFFIC AND EROSION, AND KEEP AREA FREE OF TRASH AND DEBRIS. 14.2. CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR AND REESTABLISH GRADES IN SETTLED, ERODED AND RUTTED AREAS TO SPECIFIED TOLERANCES. DURING THE CONSTRUCTION, IF REQUIRED, AND DURING THE WARRANT PERIOD, ERODED AREAS WHERE TURF IS TO BE ESTABLISHED SHALL BE RESEEDED AND MULCHED. 14.3. WHERE COMPLETED COMPACTED AREAS ARE DISTURBED BY SUBSEQUENT CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS OR ADVERSE WEATHER, CONTRACTOR SHALL SCARIFY, SURFACE, RESHAPE, AND COMPACTTO REQUIRED DENSITY PRIOR TO FURTHER CONSTRUCTION, 956'1 SAME/ —^P;60:9At&RIMETER EROSION a -. CONTROL AT CONSTRUCTION LIMITS, TYP. SWPPP NOTES: 1. THIS PROJECT IS LESS THAN ONE ACRE AND WILL NOT REQUIRE AN MPCA NPDES PERMIT. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING ANY EROSION CONTROL PERMITS REQUIRED BY THE CITY. 2. SEE GRADING PLAN FOR ADDITIONAL GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL NOTES. 3. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR SWPPP IMPLEMENTATION, INSPECTIONS, AND COMPLIANCE WITH NPOES PERMIT. LEGEND: -- - - - - - -- 1129-- - - - - -- EX. 1'CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVAL 1137 1.0' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVAL — DRAINAGEARRO'W SILT FENCE /BIOROLL - GRADING LIMIT p1 IL i STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE 1- I EROSION CONTROL BLANKET Zon Know what's below. Call before you dig. V 1 °® 5' -0' 0 10' -0Laamvnaunu pia G R O U P cr�1 En9necany • svneY 9 • Lar,a ;czpe am1�,a 4931 W. MHt S—, Su ie 200 SL LW Park, KIN 55416 civisi!eg+oup.cvm 6124150060 \�P�� ` \0 ® s; I J J rn M LO LO �I GENERAL GRADING NOTES: 1. SEE SITE PLAN FOR HORIZONTAL LAYOUT & GENERAL GRACING NOTES. 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLETE THE SITE GRADING CONSTRUCTION (INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO SITE PREPARATION, SOIL CORRECTION, EXCAVATION, EMBANKMENT, ETC.) IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OWNER'S SOILS ENGINEER. ALL SOIL TESTING SHALL BE COMPLETED BY THE OWNER'S SOILS ENGINEER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING ALL REQUIRED SOIL TESTS AND INSPECTIONS WITH THE SOILS ENGINEER. 3. GRADING AND EXCAVATION ACTIVITIES SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE NATIONAL POLLUTION DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) PERMIT REQUIREMENTS & PERMIT REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY. 4. PROPOSED SPOT GRADES ARE FLOW-LINE FINISHED GRADE ELEVATIONS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, 6. GRADES OF WALKS SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH 5% M,IAX. LONGITUDINAL SLOPE AND 1% MIN. AND 2$ MAX. CROSS SLOPE, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, 6. PROPOSED SLOPES SHALL NOT EXCEED 3'1 UNLESS INDICATED OTHERWISE ON THE DRAWINGS. MAXIMUM SLOPES IN M,W NTAINED AREAS IS 4:1 7. PROPOSED RETAINING WALLS FREESTANDING WALLS, OR COMBINATION OF WALL TYPES GREATER THAN 4- IN HEIGHT SHALL BE DESIGNED AND ENGINEERED BY A REGISTERED RETAINING WALL ENGINEER. DESIGN DRAWINGS 6RALL BE SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. B. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTENANCE OF GRADE STAKES THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF CONSTRUCTION TO ESTABLISH PROPER GRADES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ALSO BE RESPONSIBLE FORA FINAL FIELD CHECK OF FINISHED GRADES ACCEPTABLE TO THE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO TOPSOIL AND SODDING ACTIVITIES. 9. IF EXCESS OR SHORTAGE OF SOIL MATERIAL EXISTS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL TRANSPORTALL EXCESS SOIL MATERIAL OFF THE SITE TO AN AREA SELECTED BY THE CONTRACTOR, OR IMPORT SUITABLE MATERIAL TO THE SITE, 10. EXCAVATE TOPSOIL FROM AREAS TO BE FURTHER EXCAVATED OR REGRADED AND STOCKPILE IN AREAS DESIGNATED ON THE SITE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SALVAGE ENOUGH TOPSOIL FOR RESPREADING ON THE SITE AS SPECIFIED. EXCESS TOPSOIL SHALL BE PLACED IN EMBANKMENT AREAS, OUTSIDE OF BUILDING PADS, ROADWAYS AND PARKING AREAS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBCUTCUT AREAS, WHERE TURF IS TO BE ESTABLISHED, TO A DEPTH OF 6 INCHES. RESPREAD TOPSOIL IN AREAS WHERE TURF IS TO BE ESTABLISHED TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 6 INCHES. 11. FINISHED GRADING SHALL BE COMPLETED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL UNIFORMLY GRADE AREAS WITHIN LIMITS OF GRADING, INCLUDING ADJACENT TRANSITION AREAS. PROVIDE A SMOOTH FINISHED SURFACE WITHIN SPECIFIED TOLERANCES, WITH UNIFORM LEVELS OR SLOPES BETWEEN POINTS WHERE ELEVATIONS ARE SHOWN, OR BETWEEN SUCH POINTS AND EXISTING GRADES. AREAS THAT HAVE BEEN FINISH GRADED SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM SUBSEQUENT CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS, TRAFFIC AND EROSION. REPAIR ALL AREAS THAT HAVE BECOME RUTTED BY TRAFFIC OR ERODED BY WATER OR HAS SETTLED BELOW THE CORRECT GRADE. ALL AREAS DISTURBED BY THE CONTRACTOR'S OPERATIONS SHALL BE RESTOREDTO EQUAL OR BETTER THAN ORIGINAL CONDITION OR TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE NEW WORK. 12. PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF THE AGGREGATE BASE, A TEST ROLL WILL BE REQUIRED ON THE STREETANDIOR PARKING AREA SUBGRADE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A LOADED TANDEM AXLE TRUCK WITH A GROSS WEIGHT OF 25 TONS. THE TEST ROLLING SHALL BE AT THE DIRECTION OF THE SOILS ENGINEER AND SHALL BE COMPLETED IN AREAS AS DIRECTED BY THE SOILS ENGINEER. THE SOILS ENGINEER SHALL DETERMINE WHICH SECTIONS OF THE STREETOR PARKING AREA ARE UNSTABLE. CORRECTION OF THE SUBGRADE SOILS SHALL BE COMPLETED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SOILS ENGINEER. NO TEST ROLL SHALL OCCUR WITHIN 10' OFANY UNDERGROUND STORM RETENTIONIDETENTION SYSTEMS. 13. TOLERANCES 13.1. THE BUILDING SUBGRADE FINISHED SURFACE ELEVATION SHALL NOT VARY BY MORE THAN 0.30 FOOT ABOVE, OR 0.30 FOOT BELOW, THE PRESCRIBED ELEVATION AT ANY POINT WHERE MEASUREMENT IS MADE. 112. THE STREET OR PARKING AREA SU8GRADE FINISHED SURFACE ELEVATION SHALL NOTVARY BY MORE THAN 0.05 FOOT ABOVE, OR 0.10 FOOT BELOW, THE PRESCRIBED ELEVATION OF ANY POINT WHERE MEASUREMENT IS MADE. 13.3. AREAS WHICH ARE TO RECEIVE TOPSOIL SHALL BE GRADED TO WITHIN 0.30 FOOTABOVE OR BELOW THE REQUIRED ELEVATION, UNLESS DIRECTED OTHERWISE BY THE ENGINEER. 13.4. TOPSOIL SHALL BE GRADED TO PLUS OR MINUS 1/2 INCH OF THE SPECIFIED THICKNESS. 14. MAINTENANCE 14.1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT NEWLY GRADED AREAS FROM TRAFFIC AND EROSION, AND KEEP AREA FREE OF TRASH AND DEBRIS. 14.2. CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR AND REESTABLISH GRADES IN SETTLED, ERODED AND RUTTED AREAS TO SPECIFIED TOLERANCES. DURING THE CONSTRUCTION, IF REQUIRED, AND DURING THE WARRANT PERIOD, ERODED AREAS WHERE TURF IS TO BE ESTABLISHED SHALL BE RESEEDED AND MULCHED. 14.3. WHERE COMPLETED COMPACTED AREAS ARE DISTURBED BY SUBSEQUENT CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS OR ADVERSE WEATHER, CONTRACTOR SHALL SCARIFY, SURFACE, RESHAPE, AND COMPACTTO REQUIRED DENSITY PRIOR TO FURTHER CONSTRUCTION, 956'1 SAME/ —^P;60:9At&RIMETER EROSION a -. CONTROL AT CONSTRUCTION LIMITS, TYP. SWPPP NOTES: 1. THIS PROJECT IS LESS THAN ONE ACRE AND WILL NOT REQUIRE AN MPCA NPDES PERMIT. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING ANY EROSION CONTROL PERMITS REQUIRED BY THE CITY. 2. SEE GRADING PLAN FOR ADDITIONAL GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL NOTES. 3. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR SWPPP IMPLEMENTATION, INSPECTIONS, AND COMPLIANCE WITH NPOES PERMIT. LEGEND: -- - - - - - -- 1129-- - - - - -- EX. 1'CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVAL 1137 1.0' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVAL — DRAINAGEARRO'W SILT FENCE /BIOROLL - GRADING LIMIT p1 IL i STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE 1- I EROSION CONTROL BLANKET Zon Know what's below. Call before you dig. V 1 °® 5' -0' 0 10' -0Laamvnaunu pia G R O U P cr�1 En9necany • svneY 9 • Lar,a ;czpe am1�,a 4931 W. MHt S—, Su ie 200 SL LW Park, KIN 55416 civisi!eg+oup.cvm 6124150060 \�P�� ` \0 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF Nil NESOTA Ma rew R. Pavek DATE 01/04/19 mFNsE No. 44263 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DRAVM BY '.V /B, NOD REVIEIVED BY: PJS REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION GRADING PLAN & PROPOSED EROSION C2.0 ® V J J rn M LO LO Z M m Z to Un O Z a W O W F- LU ❑ Q) W of O O(n J Z N wLO LO LO w W LO M 0 N O K a 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF Nil NESOTA Ma rew R. Pavek DATE 01/04/19 mFNsE No. 44263 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DRAVM BY '.V /B, NOD REVIEIVED BY: PJS REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION GRADING PLAN & PROPOSED EROSION C2.0 TI9S OCCURS ONLY V.KRE TOOLED CONTROL JOINT MULCH MEETS EDGE OF WALK SEE DETAi (TYP.) LEAVE TOP OF MULCH DGYM I" U'HTBROOkI FINISH PERPENOCIRAR TO FROMTOPOFIVALK � TRAFFlCV.RH 3',Y)DESlOOTH MO'AELLED EDGE ;;;I�.'P"E'�IF'l NYRETE AS SPECIFIED Y1.6 'Y_' ESH AND CHAIRS AS ED CSS S A GGREGATE BA BE CW.IPACTED SUBGRADE NOTES: I. INSTALLATION AND REINFORCEMENT SHALL BE CERTIFIED AND IN ACCORDANCE TO AN 044 T ACl TECHNICIAN AS SPECIFIED. Z SEE GE0.TECHNICAL RECWkENDATIONS FOR GROSS V .EIGHT RECNREIAEMS. 3. SEE LAYOUT DRAMNGS FOR UPI OFY✓ALXS. 4. SEE CQNCRETE JOUR DETAIL FOR REQUIREMENTS. 5.12' WIDE EXPANSION JO NIT AND SEALANT AT ALL CURBS. 6.VARFMESHANDCHAIRS REQIAREDFORPi WLXSORRI LOCATIONS FOR VEHICULARTRAFFIC. 311 FROM EDGE OF ROAD TO FRONTOF SPEED SU%'P 1.5' WEAR COURSE (NINDOT 2360 - SPWEA340B) NOTE: TACK COAT (M,NDOT 2357) U SECTION IS FOR BASE COURSE NINDOT 2360- SB3 2 ' PNW308 ( ) BIDDING PURPOSES 6' CLASS 5 AGGREGATE ONLY. REFER TO SUBBASE (MNDOT 3138) GEOTECH FOR FINAL PAVEMENT I I F Z SECTION. WI I I COMPACTED SUBGRADE (100 %OF STANDARD Z/^ PROCTOR MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY) LIGHT DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT CLIPS 12'O.C. POSTS AS SPECIFIED. NTS EXISTING GROUND TI9S OCCURS ONLY V.KRE TOOLED CONTROL JOINT MULCH MEETS EDGE OF WALK SEE DETAi (TYP.) LEAVE TOP OF MULCH DGYM I" U'HTBROOkI FINISH PERPENOCIRAR TO FROMTOPOFIVALK � TRAFFlCV.RH 3',Y)DESlOOTH MO'AELLED EDGE ;;;I�.'P"E'�IF'l NYRETE AS SPECIFIED Y1.6 'Y_' ESH AND CHAIRS AS ED CSS S A GGREGATE BA BE CW.IPACTED SUBGRADE NOTES: I. INSTALLATION AND REINFORCEMENT SHALL BE CERTIFIED AND IN ACCORDANCE TO AN 044 T ACl TECHNICIAN AS SPECIFIED. Z SEE GE0.TECHNICAL RECWkENDATIONS FOR GROSS V .EIGHT RECNREIAEMS. 3. SEE LAYOUT DRAMNGS FOR UPI OFY✓ALXS. 4. SEE CQNCRETE JOUR DETAIL FOR REQUIREMENTS. 5.12' WIDE EXPANSION JO NIT AND SEALANT AT ALL CURBS. 6.VARFMESHANDCHAIRS REQIAREDFORPi WLXSORRI LOCATIONS FOR VEHICULARTRAFFIC. 311 FROM EDGE OF ROAD TO FRONTOF SPEED SU%'P NOTES: 1. PROVIDE APPROPRIATE TRANSITION BETWEEN STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE AND UNDISTURBED ROADWAY, 2. THE ENTRAN CE SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A CONDITION WHICH WILL PREVENT TRACKING OR FLOWING OF SEDIMENT ONTO UNDISTURBED ROADWAY, THIS MAY REQUIRE PERIODIC TOP DRESSING WITH ADDITIONAL STONE OR ADDING STONE TO THE LENGTH OF THE ENTRANCE. 3. REPAIR AND CLEANOUT MEASURES USED TO TRAP SEDIMENT. 4. ALL SEDIMENT SPILLED, DROPPED, WASHED, OR TRACKED ONTO UNDISTURBED ROADWAY SHALL BE REMOVED AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. 5. FINAL LOCATION AND INSTALLATION SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE CITY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. 'B' TAMP THE TRENCH FULL OF SOIL. SECURE WITH ROW OF STAPLES, 10' SPACING, 4' DOWN FROM TRENCH 'C' OVERLAP: BURY UPPER END OF LOWER STRIP AS IN 'A' AND'B'. OVERLAP END OF TOP STRIP 4" AND STAPLE. � 'D' EROSION STOP: FOLD OF MATTING BURIED IN SILT TRENCH AND TAMPED. DCUBLEROW OF STAPLES. PLACE STAPLES 2 FEET APART 'A' BURYTHETOPENDOFTHE MATTING IN A TRENCH 4' OR MORE IN DEPTH NOTE: I. PLACE STAPLES 2 FEET APARTTO KEEP MATTING FIRMLY PRESSED TO SOIL. -� TYPICAL STAPLE #8 6. CRUSHED STONE SHALL BE 1 -112' DIA CLOSE GRADED, AND IN ACCORDANCE TO MNDOT SECTION 2118. TO KEEP MATTING FIRMLY -1- GAUGE WIRE 2 LIGHT DUTY CONCRETE WALK/PAD PRESSED TO SOIL. NTS J STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ACCESS EROSION BLANKET NTS Z6� NTS FABRIC AS SPECIFIED _R AS SPECIFIED FILL UPSTREAM BASE EDGE WITH EXISTING GROUND 2' OF DIRT OR COMPOST TO SURFACE �_ �EPIBED ROLL � DI RECTION OF FLOW WOODEN STAKES 11YX2 'X16' MIN, PLACED 10' O.C. WHEN INSTALLED ON GROUND. IF INSTALLED ON PVMT. PROVIDE SANDBAGS BEHIND AND ON TOP AT MIN. 10' O.C. NOTE: 1. COMPOST FILTER LOGS (BID ROLLS) SHALL BE FILTREXX EROSION CONTROL SOXX OR APPROVED EQUAL. 2. COMPOST FILLER TO BE MADE FROM A COMPOST BLEND 30 %40% GRADE 2 (SPEC 3890) AND 60'/,70% PARTIALLY DECOMPOSED WOOD CHIPS, PER NINDOT SPEC 3697, 3. FILTER FABRIC SHALL BE GEOTEXTILE KNITTED MATERIAL WITH MAX. OPENINGS OF 318'. 4. IF MULTIPLE ROLLS NEEDED, OVERLAP BY MIN. 12' AT ENDS AND STAKE. 5. SILT SHALL BE REMOVED ONCE IT REACHES 80% OF THE HEIGHT OF THE ROLL OR AS DEEMED NECESSARY BY SITE CONTRACTOR TO MAINTAIN PROPER FUNCTION. 3 SEDIMENT BIO -ROLL / COMPOST FILTER LOG TUTS U .�i K FILTER FABRIC WITH WIRE SUPPORT NET AS SPECIFIED, METAL POST AS M Z SPECIFIED. Z/^ SUPPORT NET: 12 GAUGE 4'X WIRE HOOKED ONTO FABRIC AS SPECIFIED SECURE WIRE SUPPORT NET WITH METAL r CLIPS 12'O.C. POSTS AS SPECIFIED. // EXISTING GROUND ` ANCHOR FABRIC WITH SUR SURFACE DIRECTION OF FLOI W 0 U) Q pLLI o O = J 000 t` �\ Y / Z N w L0 h Uni 1J N M O w N o' D. JLI= r`r s�srrsar' ' 111 ' - - f°JIIJLIC�IIF�II�IIi -:� !I!J--L!!''FIl�-1 I O�L�J�I!'� ILL- Il I�Ir -I�l JI�Il � Il � n n -n -n n n- n- n- n- n�n�n Il Il E .�J1 hn�n n-n- =.IL .0 =.IIr� nine -n -l- -n NOTES: 1. PROVIDE APPROPRIATE TRANSITION BETWEEN STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE AND UNDISTURBED ROADWAY, 2. THE ENTRAN CE SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A CONDITION WHICH WILL PREVENT TRACKING OR FLOWING OF SEDIMENT ONTO UNDISTURBED ROADWAY, THIS MAY REQUIRE PERIODIC TOP DRESSING WITH ADDITIONAL STONE OR ADDING STONE TO THE LENGTH OF THE ENTRANCE. 3. REPAIR AND CLEANOUT MEASURES USED TO TRAP SEDIMENT. 4. ALL SEDIMENT SPILLED, DROPPED, WASHED, OR TRACKED ONTO UNDISTURBED ROADWAY SHALL BE REMOVED AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. 5. FINAL LOCATION AND INSTALLATION SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE CITY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. 'B' TAMP THE TRENCH FULL OF SOIL. SECURE WITH ROW OF STAPLES, 10' SPACING, 4' DOWN FROM TRENCH 'C' OVERLAP: BURY UPPER END OF LOWER STRIP AS IN 'A' AND'B'. OVERLAP END OF TOP STRIP 4" AND STAPLE. � 'D' EROSION STOP: FOLD OF MATTING BURIED IN SILT TRENCH AND TAMPED. DCUBLEROW OF STAPLES. PLACE STAPLES 2 FEET APART 'A' BURYTHETOPENDOFTHE MATTING IN A TRENCH 4' OR MORE IN DEPTH NOTE: I. PLACE STAPLES 2 FEET APARTTO KEEP MATTING FIRMLY PRESSED TO SOIL. -� TYPICAL STAPLE #8 6. CRUSHED STONE SHALL BE 1 -112' DIA CLOSE GRADED, AND IN ACCORDANCE TO MNDOT SECTION 2118. TO KEEP MATTING FIRMLY -1- GAUGE WIRE 2 LIGHT DUTY CONCRETE WALK/PAD PRESSED TO SOIL. NTS J STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ACCESS EROSION BLANKET NTS Z6� NTS FABRIC AS SPECIFIED _R AS SPECIFIED FILL UPSTREAM BASE EDGE WITH EXISTING GROUND 2' OF DIRT OR COMPOST TO SURFACE �_ �EPIBED ROLL � DI RECTION OF FLOW WOODEN STAKES 11YX2 'X16' MIN, PLACED 10' O.C. WHEN INSTALLED ON GROUND. IF INSTALLED ON PVMT. PROVIDE SANDBAGS BEHIND AND ON TOP AT MIN. 10' O.C. NOTE: 1. COMPOST FILTER LOGS (BID ROLLS) SHALL BE FILTREXX EROSION CONTROL SOXX OR APPROVED EQUAL. 2. COMPOST FILLER TO BE MADE FROM A COMPOST BLEND 30 %40% GRADE 2 (SPEC 3890) AND 60'/,70% PARTIALLY DECOMPOSED WOOD CHIPS, PER NINDOT SPEC 3697, 3. FILTER FABRIC SHALL BE GEOTEXTILE KNITTED MATERIAL WITH MAX. OPENINGS OF 318'. 4. IF MULTIPLE ROLLS NEEDED, OVERLAP BY MIN. 12' AT ENDS AND STAKE. 5. SILT SHALL BE REMOVED ONCE IT REACHES 80% OF THE HEIGHT OF THE ROLL OR AS DEEMED NECESSARY BY SITE CONTRACTOR TO MAINTAIN PROPER FUNCTION. 3 SEDIMENT BIO -ROLL / COMPOST FILTER LOG TUTS CARRY WIRE SUPPORT NET A V / DOWN INTO TRENCH �I METAL POSTS 8' -O' O.C. L MAX. %1 SEDIMENT FENCE Vj NTS RIBBON CURB OR CURB CUT, SEE SITE AND GRADING PLANS GRASS PRE - TREATMENT STRIP OR PRE - TREATMENT STRUCTURE, SEE UTILITY AND LANDSCAPE PLANS 3H:1 L MAX. -jll T� �- I�i III- - UNDISTURBED,UNCOh1PACTED INSITU SOIL JAI NET LESS EROSION BLANKET IN BOTTOM OF BASIN. SLIT BLANKET TO ALLOW PLANT MATERIAL SURFACE IF PLUG PLANTING IS TO BE USED, SEE GRADING AND LANDSCAPE PLANS MIN. PLANTING MEDIUM DEPTH 24' WITH A WELL BLENDED MIXTURE (BY VOLUME): 70% HOMOGENOUS CONSTRUCTION SAND 30% ORGANIC COMPOST CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCING SIDE SLOPE TREATMENTS, SEE GRADING SEE GRADING PLAN FOR DEPTH PLANT MATERIAL, SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN LINE E' RECOMMEN ANIONS FROM OR CLAY 1 GEOTECH ENGNIEER' BELOW POND DUE TO - _ - - - CONTAPAINATED GROUNDWATER UNDERDRAIN GRAVEL BLANKET 14.5" DOUBLE WASHED STONE (NON LIMESTONE OR CONCRETE MATERIAL) PERFORATED UNDERDRAIN OUTLET PIPE 6" DIAMETER RIGID, PERFORRATED PVC. SEE UTILITY PLAN MUST OVER EXCAVATE DOWN TO SUITABLE SOILS. FIELD VERIFY WITH SOILS ENGINEER. TYPICAL SECTION VIEW 1. INSTALL SILT FENCE AND /OR OR OTHER APPROPRIATE TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL DEVICES TO PREVENT SEDIMENT FROM LEAVING OR ENTERING THE PRACTICE DURING CONSTRUCTION. 2. ALL DOWN- GRADIENT PERIMETER SEDIMENT CONTROL BMP'S MUST BE IN PLACE BEFORE ANY UP GRADIENT LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITY BEGINS. 3. PERFORM CONTINUOUS INSPECTIONS OF EROSION CONTROL PRACTICES. 4, INSTALL UTILITIES (WATER, SANITARY SEWER, ELECTRIC, PHONE, FIBER OPTIC, ETC) PRIOR TO SETTING FINAL GRADE OF BIORETENTION DEVICE. 5. ROUGH GRADE THE SITE. IF BIORETENTION AREAS ARE BEING USED AS TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASINS LEAVE A MINIMUM OF 3 FEET OF COVER OVER THE PRACTICE TO PROTECT THE UNDERLYING SOILS FROM CLOGGING, 6. PERFORM ALL OTHER SITE IMPROVEMENTS. 7, PLANT ALL AREAS AFTER DISTURBANCE. 6. CONSTRUCT BIORETENTION DEVICE UPON STABILIZATION OF CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREA 9. IMPLEMENT TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT EROSION CONTROL PRACTICES. 10. PLANT ANDIOR ROCK MULCH BIORETENTION DEVICE. I. REMOVE TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL DEVICES AFTER THE CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREA IS ADEQUATELY VEGETATED. BIO- FILTRATION BASIN (RAIN GARDEN - TYP.) 7 TUTS GENERAL NOTES 1. IN THE EVENT THAT SEDIMENT IS INTRODUCED INTO THE BMP DURING OR IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING EXCAVATION, THIS MATERIAL SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE PRACTICE PRIORTO CONTINUING CONSTRUCTION. 2. GRADING OF BIORETENTION DEVICES SHALL BE ACCOMPLISHED USING LOW - COMPACTION EARTH - MOVING EQUIPMENT TO PREVENT COMPACTION OF UNDERLYING SOILS, 3, ALL SUB MATERIALS BELOW THE SPECIFIED BIORETENTION DEPTH (ELEVATION) SHALL BE UNDISTURBED, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. cl"ViLsaote G R ® U P Ct.I Engn d,•S-Yq-Lardscaps Ankh I-- 4931 W. 35th SUeet, SITe 200 St. LnulsPark, l.1N 55416 civM'"-p -I, 612 - 615-0060 U K FILTER FABRIC WITH WIRE SUPPORT NET AS SPECIFIED, METAL POST AS M Z SPECIFIED. Z/^ SUPPORT NET: 12 GAUGE 4'X WIRE HOOKED ONTO FABRIC AS SPECIFIED SECURE WIRE SUPPORT NET WITH METAL PREFORMED CHANNELS ON CLIPS 12'O.C. POSTS AS SPECIFIED. // EXISTING GROUND ` ANCHOR FABRIC WITH SUR SURFACE DIRECTION OF FLOI W CARRY WIRE SUPPORT NET A V / DOWN INTO TRENCH �I METAL POSTS 8' -O' O.C. L MAX. %1 SEDIMENT FENCE Vj NTS RIBBON CURB OR CURB CUT, SEE SITE AND GRADING PLANS GRASS PRE - TREATMENT STRIP OR PRE - TREATMENT STRUCTURE, SEE UTILITY AND LANDSCAPE PLANS 3H:1 L MAX. -jll T� �- I�i III- - UNDISTURBED,UNCOh1PACTED INSITU SOIL JAI NET LESS EROSION BLANKET IN BOTTOM OF BASIN. SLIT BLANKET TO ALLOW PLANT MATERIAL SURFACE IF PLUG PLANTING IS TO BE USED, SEE GRADING AND LANDSCAPE PLANS MIN. PLANTING MEDIUM DEPTH 24' WITH A WELL BLENDED MIXTURE (BY VOLUME): 70% HOMOGENOUS CONSTRUCTION SAND 30% ORGANIC COMPOST CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCING SIDE SLOPE TREATMENTS, SEE GRADING SEE GRADING PLAN FOR DEPTH PLANT MATERIAL, SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN LINE E' RECOMMEN ANIONS FROM OR CLAY 1 GEOTECH ENGNIEER' BELOW POND DUE TO - _ - - - CONTAPAINATED GROUNDWATER UNDERDRAIN GRAVEL BLANKET 14.5" DOUBLE WASHED STONE (NON LIMESTONE OR CONCRETE MATERIAL) PERFORATED UNDERDRAIN OUTLET PIPE 6" DIAMETER RIGID, PERFORRATED PVC. SEE UTILITY PLAN MUST OVER EXCAVATE DOWN TO SUITABLE SOILS. FIELD VERIFY WITH SOILS ENGINEER. TYPICAL SECTION VIEW 1. INSTALL SILT FENCE AND /OR OR OTHER APPROPRIATE TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL DEVICES TO PREVENT SEDIMENT FROM LEAVING OR ENTERING THE PRACTICE DURING CONSTRUCTION. 2. ALL DOWN- GRADIENT PERIMETER SEDIMENT CONTROL BMP'S MUST BE IN PLACE BEFORE ANY UP GRADIENT LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITY BEGINS. 3. PERFORM CONTINUOUS INSPECTIONS OF EROSION CONTROL PRACTICES. 4, INSTALL UTILITIES (WATER, SANITARY SEWER, ELECTRIC, PHONE, FIBER OPTIC, ETC) PRIOR TO SETTING FINAL GRADE OF BIORETENTION DEVICE. 5. ROUGH GRADE THE SITE. IF BIORETENTION AREAS ARE BEING USED AS TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASINS LEAVE A MINIMUM OF 3 FEET OF COVER OVER THE PRACTICE TO PROTECT THE UNDERLYING SOILS FROM CLOGGING, 6. PERFORM ALL OTHER SITE IMPROVEMENTS. 7, PLANT ALL AREAS AFTER DISTURBANCE. 6. CONSTRUCT BIORETENTION DEVICE UPON STABILIZATION OF CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREA 9. IMPLEMENT TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT EROSION CONTROL PRACTICES. 10. PLANT ANDIOR ROCK MULCH BIORETENTION DEVICE. I. REMOVE TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL DEVICES AFTER THE CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREA IS ADEQUATELY VEGETATED. BIO- FILTRATION BASIN (RAIN GARDEN - TYP.) 7 TUTS GENERAL NOTES 1. IN THE EVENT THAT SEDIMENT IS INTRODUCED INTO THE BMP DURING OR IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING EXCAVATION, THIS MATERIAL SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE PRACTICE PRIORTO CONTINUING CONSTRUCTION. 2. GRADING OF BIORETENTION DEVICES SHALL BE ACCOMPLISHED USING LOW - COMPACTION EARTH - MOVING EQUIPMENT TO PREVENT COMPACTION OF UNDERLYING SOILS, 3, ALL SUB MATERIALS BELOW THE SPECIFIED BIORETENTION DEPTH (ELEVATION) SHALL BE UNDISTURBED, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. cl"ViLsaote G R ® U P Ct.I Engn d,•S-Yq-Lardscaps Ankh I-- 4931 W. 35th SUeet, SITe 200 St. LnulsPark, l.1N 55416 civM'"-p -I, 612 - 615-0060 I HEREBY CERTI FY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER /MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I ALI A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF hll NESOTA Ma ew R. Pavek DATE 01/04/19 LICENSE NO. 44263 ISSUEISUBMITTAL SUMMARY DRAVANBY:YB,NQD REVIEIVECBY:PJS PROJECT NUMBER: 18312 REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION CIVIL DETAILS C4.0 U J rn Z Z M Z Z/^ ® z w V w O W 0 U) Q pLLI o O = J 000 t` �\ Y / Z N w L0 h Uni 1J N M O w N o' D. I HEREBY CERTI FY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER /MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I ALI A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF hll NESOTA Ma ew R. Pavek DATE 01/04/19 LICENSE NO. 44263 ISSUEISUBMITTAL SUMMARY DRAVANBY:YB,NQD REVIEIVECBY:PJS PROJECT NUMBER: 18312 REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION CIVIL DETAILS C4.0 Tree Inventory: 23825 Lawtonka Dr, Shorewood (Lot 6, Block 1, Lawtonka) 25 Trees Inventoried (Tags 201 - 225) 203 202 201 f "t 207 225 6 2, 209 224 208 7 10 S &S Project:Tree Inventory/ Preliminary Tree Preservation Plan for 23825 Lawtonka Dr, Shorewood (Lot 6, Block 1, Lawtonka) Date: November 9, 2018 Prepared By: Mary Johnson, Certified Arborist MN- 4238A, S &S Tree City of Shorewood's Definition of Significant Tree (i.e. Tree to be included in this inventory): Any healthy long -lived hardwood deciduous tree measuring 8" diameter or greater; any healthy softwood deciduous tree measuring 12" diameter or greater; or any healthy coniferous tree measuring 8 feet or more in height. Boxelder, cottonwood, and willow trees shall not be considered to be significant trees. NOTE: ALL significant trees on the ENTIRE lot are included in this inventory. Thirteen trees are on Parcel A and 12 trees are on Parcel B. NOTE: there are 2 large sugar maples (35" and 45" in diameter) on this property (one on Parcel A and one on Parcel B), which are NOT included in this inventory because they are UNHEALTHY due to decay. Therefore, they are NON - SIGNIFICANT trees. Tag: round, metal tags (numbered 201- 225), along with a strip of blue ribbon, located about 5' above ground. Tree Diameter (DIA): in inches, measured at 54" above ground. The diameters of multi -stem trees are added together. Tree Condition (COND): Good or Fair. These trees are considered healthy. Poor condition trees are considered unhealthy, so they are not included in this inventory. Parcel : A or B, as shown on the Certificate of Survey. Fate: Remove tree or Save tree. This is the ANTICIPATED FATE, given the house pad and driveway locations on the Certificate of Survey. This may change once locations are finalized. At this time, there are,i' trees to be removed because they are within 15' of the proposed house pads or driveways. G Z_ trees are to be saved. X and Y Coordinates: Longitude and Latitude of the tree's location. Our locations are Resource Grade, not Survey Grade. TREE AND HORTICULTURAL SPECIALISTS, INC. a D9VEY . company TAG SPECIES DIA COND PARCEL FATE NOTES X Y 201 Spruce, Blue 9 good A rem , 8 feet tall - 93.5825086500 44.9025460745 202 Spruce, White 5 good A f save 12 feet tall - 93.5826178046 44.9025503176 203 Maple, Sugar ' . 13 good A re_ t .11,A ` - 93.5828340656 44.9025482656 204 IMaple, Sugar 11 Igood A saver 30 feet tall - 93.5829895404 44.9025442422 205 Basswood 15 Ifair A save 30 feet tall - 93.5829651278 44.9025253034 206 Basswood 34 fair A F r % fa 2 stems 19 " +15" - 93.5829405948 44.9024742333 207 Basswood 46 fair A eve %' 3 stems 17 " +17 " +12" - 93.5829606689 44.9023985989 208 Hackberry 18 fair A saves: ,,:, - 93.5828922232 44.9023160733 209 Hackberry 26 fair A save 2 stems 13 " +13" - 93.5829299812 44.9023348757 210 Ash, Green 20 Igood A aue " near parcel B - 93.5828045856 44.9023182778 211 Spruce, White 1 15 Ifair A remove 55 feet tall , - 93.5828087739 44.9024382884 TAG SPECIES DIA COND PARCEL FATE NOTES X Y 212 Spruce, White 7 fair A remove 12 feet tall - 93.5826087442 44.9024772772 213 Elm, American 12 fair A remove - 93.5825720564 44.9024382842 214 Oak, Red 35 fair B same "�`� - 93.5824156656 44.9024418523 215 Spruce, White 7 good B remove 30 feet tall - 93.5825228076 44.9023606760 216 ISpruce, White 7 fair B remove 30 feet tall - 93.5825817038 44.9023555381 217 Maple, Sugar 8 good B remove - 93.5825931528 44.9023124270 218 Birch, Paper 18 good B save,_ .,. 2 stems 11 " +7" - 93.5828178994 44.9021745896 219 Honey locust 12 fair B saves: ,,:, - 93.5826578150 44.9021618544 220 Pine, White 18 1good B save 50 feet tall - 93.5824696479 44.9021134055 221 1 Pine, White 18 good B saki' 45 feet tall - 93.5824130978 44.9021633989 222 Pine, White' ` 12 fair B 35 feet tall - 93.5824070811 44.9022054312 223 Maple, Norway 17 fair B remove - 93.5824300878 44.9023023889 224 Spruce, White 10 good B siv 25 feet tall - 93.5823805376 44.9023355639 225 Spruce; Blue 5 fair B saw 125 feet tall - 93.5823689428 44.9023807223 ADDRESS: 23825 LAWTONICA DRIVE PARCEL A AREA = 14,544 SQ. FT. HOUSE AREA = 2,295 SQ. FT. PORCH AREA = 168 SQ. FT SIDEWALK = 101 SQ. FT SCREEN PORCH = 180 SQ. FT DRIVEWAY = 888 SQ. FT. IMPERVIOUS = 3, 632 SQ. FT. L = 24.977 PARCEL B AREA = 14,183 SQ. FT HOUSE AREA = 2,295 SQ. FT. PORCH AREA = 168 SQ. FT. SIDEWALK = 101 SQ. Fl: SCREEN PORCH = 180 SQ. FT. DRIVEWAY = 794 SO. FT. IMPERVIOUS = 3,538 SQ. FT. L = 24.947 7 O O ti W O O In ce) O O U) O W z N � _U2 EXISTING ri //N89' 331 E,1,�t,J50�00 ,i;�,l I - WD 7'05i T [D ^} '3 / �c>�ut�V ° 'h1 I y T� ID 206 �� l�l {�" �� PROPOSED !i I I I I HIOUSE1 { I1 x JR I D 07 C I TRID 21.1 I F /WOII . -i III I i �QI �s�cFFti:�� -A CE� 111 0 _ OSO�'� I R JD t� Zd'i I�I z; SE� \,tip 1TR D 268 J I_�RdPOSED c' t DRAINAGE •UTILIT� 'EAR tf ENT I : BILL(I)T ,6 OC� Il T Bohlen Surveying & Associates 31432 Foliage Avenue 1682 Cliff Road E. Northfield, MN 55057 Burnsville, MN 55337 Phone: (507) 645 -7768 Phone: (952) 895 -9212 tomeara @bohlensurveying.com Fax: (952) 895 -9259 r ID 202 O iI .EWALK C I�1D 217 0 to — t F� \ PROPOSED s ° HOUSE �` `FB/WO. S89 013'31 V 150.00 >i L N N , i �Io — BENCH—MARK.- FIRE HYDRANT, TNH ELEV. = 958.51 (0 < 00 0 P O coG� cR� �F SFR MFR �c�Re 10 TRIDZta N' PROPOSED PARCEL A N LOT 6, BLOCK 1, LAWTONKA, CITY OF SHOREWOOD, \a HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA LYING Y ri NORTHWESTERLY OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED z�Q LINES; COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 6; THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 35 MINUTES 00 SECONDS EAST, ALONG THE WEST LINE JA N �_ OF SAID LOT 6, A DISTANCE OF 179.00 FEET TO THE �S —7 SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 6 AND THE POINT ° d / OF BEGINNING OF THE LINES TO BE DESCRIBED; I ' J THENCE NORTH 38 DEGREES 31 MINUTES 04 SECONDS o , l W EAST, A DISTANCE OF 113.49 FEET; THENCE NORTH 51 R tDn X23 1✓ DEGREES 16 MINUTES 27 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE " \ ( OF 112.86 FEET TO THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF , p 5 cr 1 �l O SAID LOT 6 AND THERE TERMINATING. 1 TOGETHER WITH AN EASEMENT FOR DRAINAGE & 0 N UTILITY PURPOSES OVER AND ACROSS THE }} O SOUTHEASTERLY 5.0 FEET OF THE ABOVE I�lr Z DESCRIBED PROPERTY. I V � V (4) (0, R t ul H �_VL -,k 'Tz -I 1l-L_ -7 H E.W TA-�-rL;� LOT 6, BLOCK 1, LAWTONKA, CITY OF SHOREWOOD, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA LYING SOUTHEASTERLY OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LINES; COMMENCING AT THE NORTHW EST CORNER OF SAID LOT 6; THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 35 MINUTES 00 SECONDS EAST, ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 6, A DISTANCE OF 179.00 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 6 AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE LINES TO BE DESCRIBED; THENCE NORTH 38 DEGREES 31 MINUTES 04 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF 113.49 FEET; THENCE NORTH 51 DEGREES 16 MINUTES 27 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF 112.86 FEET TO THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 6 AND THERE TERMINATING. TOGETHER WITH AN EASEMENT FOR DRAINAGE & UTLITY PURPOSES OVER AND ACROSS THE NORTHWESTERLY 5.0 FEET OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY. NOTE. ALL BUILDING DIMENSIONS ARE SHOWN TO OUTSIDE OF FOUNDATION WALL S:\Projects\shorewood\LAWTONKA-ADDITION\dwg\L6B I - SPLIT -I 1- 8- 18.dwg Q DENOTES MAILBOX O DENOTES IRON PIPE MONUMENT SET DENOTES FOUND IRON PIPE MONUMENT DENOTES PROPOSED DRAINAGE DIRECTION DENOTES SERVICE LOCATION El DENOTES WOOD HUB 000.0 DENOTES EXISTING ELEVATION 000.0 DENOTES PROPOSED ELEVATION '0O00,— DENOTES EXISTING CONTOUR L DENOTES PROPOSED CONTOUR DENOTES DECIDUOUS TREE DENOTES EVERGREEN TREE TR ID 000" "3 vtj DENOTES DECIDUOUS TREE WITH TREE TAG TR ID 000 "Jt DENOTES EVERGREEN TREE WITH TREE TAG r TR ID 000, 3 DENOTES DECIDUOUS TREE TO BE REMOVED TR ID 000 DENOTES EVERGREEN TREE TO BE REMOVED DENOTES BITUMINOUS SURFACE DENOTES CONCRETE SURFACE DENOTES GRAVEL SURFACE DUPLEX SETBACK INFORMATION: FRONT - 20' SIDE YARD - 10' SIDE YARD - 20' BETWEEN BLDGS REAR YARD - 40' PROPOSED TOP OF WALL ELEV. = 960.3 PROPOSED GARAGE FLOOR ELEV. = 960.0 PROPOSED BASEMENT FLOOR ELEV. = 951.6 EXISTING PROPERTY DESCRIPTION LOT 6, BLOCK 1, LAWTONKA, CITY OF SHOREWOOD, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SURVEY WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA, {a DATE: 10 -23 -2018 7 h u I � U nMR",D, REVISED: 1 -6 -2019 THOMAS J. O'MEARA, LAND SURVEYOR MINNESOTA LICENSE NO. 46167 STait VErk�z TO4S�u- \VZAP 24 ®- CMLP6 12 e� Dow TRn.) — t"T OILY) LET ELEVATWN SCALE v4' - r -0' 12 e 8' LP ARCu TRaq .4LC.S ARC�LI wkt 5-8' "-Law ZvNgL TO 4 -4' l EL v mD L LP FLAT PALL NT\VPUl 12 JCf1JJ�l 11 1 ill.Il L. QB A 1 1uIIJ IIJ III_�11i ., iI l� 11 l 11 TJI [I J 1 1 l III 1 I (�l Il LP FZ>EZE aoAZVs JILL 1i� ILI�TJ�I J1 I LPe%j 11111 J�J� 171, ®GA3LL-5- FRatraLY llI� I IIIILJIJI JIji11 I1 11 II L, P _I]� �Jn NiI I iiTIIII 151_lIL iLIll J �}lILI[L... P °p'°4 IFROt)T OILY) I,Ir�Ir —ICI p 6' coQttlz TRq L��L � � E 4�Rar✓T OILY) TO 4ff o; - OIIIIIIIIIIIIq aowrjLz. 24' Sa STOtr CAZRIAGT 9TYLC 4'AZ44C. DOORS wA110POW6 64SE vAZ Sa LP COLMfl AWL (afTY 3) FRONT ELEVATVN SCALE V4-. i-9 CLDA2 RAL , Af-TAL SP6bLLS i VR a LQ Tpu) �Ly) 1[1lEEe �a o s P-9 AV— ELEVAJVN SCALL v4' - f -a PRESCRIPTIVE BRACED WALL LINE CALCULATION FOR: LOWERLEVEL FLOOR PLAIN (1st LEVEL) 15' -0' 6' x 6 POST ml 15 -0" �9c19R Linos 2 _•- _ _ I` (2) 2xs2 FLDS `'(t-AOL z ,ten 1 CSWSP 14' 1' l /.0 7.3 .90 1.0 5.8'TM S- PERTABLER602.10.4 2 CSWSP 14' -0° 4.T 1.0 1.3 .95 1.0 8.5 8' -0° PER TABLE ft602.10A PRESCRIPTIVE BRACED WALL LINE CALCULATION FOR: LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN (1st LEVEL) - _ _o n.I ��8 0 --T Lines 2 rtcaa A CSWSP( CS PF 45 -0° 1325 1.0 1.3 .95 1.0 18.36' 27 -10' PER TABLE R602.10.4 SEE DETAIL ON SHT5 FOR CS PF* B CSWSP 1 45 -0' 1125 1 1.0 1 13 .95 1.0 1 18.30 201° IERTABLE1602.10A * CS PF PANELS CONTRIBUTE AS ACTUAL PER TBL R602.10.5 Note: 20' -0° —i— spacing beh— Braced WO Panels A B MAM FLR DIMe , TAKEN FROM EM. BREATHING PLANE I RH JOIST SPRAY FOAM ALL RIM EXTERIOR MSUL. TO BE PROTEOTm AREAS TO R -1O rIM1 FROM TOP OF FND, WALL TO 6' EE10W GRADE OR, APPROVED H TOTPROTE 1R1 1 2X9 ERL PLATE COVER OR FROM DE F011SH T PROTECT e/SRL REALER THE ,SHT FROM DETERI MAA DUE i0 EUHLIGHi 1 PHY &CAL DAMAGE. 6 rIl. POLY ANCHOR BOLTS PER CODE SUP SHEET OVER TTP. r TOP OF FND WALL ENTIRE EXTERIOR SURFACE OF NONDRAMMG FOUNDATION MEULATION FHD. INSULATION PFR MN I1 I, T CODE R40f.2b BBMM DIM'. R -b nln IN°JtDE OF ON TAKEN FROM EXT. FOUNDATION SIDE OF FOUNDATION WALL FCVNDATION T /FOUNPATION PP-TAIL SCALE. r1T5. -I--- O 0 2 4s' -B' I ,60 O 0 ADADDJ15T FNWL \VALL WKUT OF 1100,- PER 113' DEL-P FLR U rm I.'IASTL �— B4T11z) -1 FOR RECLSSLD 5110 \VER FLR GENERAL NOTES: 23' -0" 9' -0' HIGH POURED CONC. FOUNDATION HEIGHT AND WIDTH AS NOTED REINFORCED AS REQUIRED A B • WALKOUT BASEMENT • REDUCE FLR JOIST DEPTH TO 18' UNDER MASTER BATHRM SHWRAREA Lo\\,Im Lp-yEL FLOOR PLAN ALL HEADERS ERRS T HEIGHT ) Z(10 7-10° (U O) • ALL HEADERS TO BE (2)2x10 TVP. (UNO) SCALE v4- - I-,Y 15' -0' 6' x 6 POST ml IT-COtk POST _•- _ _ I` (2) 2xs2 FLDS `'(t-AOL z FT4 (OITY s) ' T -6" T -6" 6 16' -6" 0 14' -6" 14' -0" 6' -0' `0 5C72ELll PORCH 0 460\11 o 14' -6' T -0' T -0^ 6'-0' ' TV TD 202 LFDGI =e — —, BOARD T1hL R@Q SLL PC-TAL 5117 A4 4snsr •s _(2) 36 n 6o 511 T -3' T -3" 1 _ r (2) 210 tbz rl5A"TL 9' -3' 7' -3" (2) II 7/8'L DRP ll',lZ v i T I I FL-ooR To (24 TP- a..£z5 - a>.s..I - - -- e ------- rcmr.I - - - - -- I - - - c- - - n - S1J n Fx 36 n 60 Su _ � ; FEl5l1E0 CJEDRA� o N B I w P1F ii . l u _° _ _ _ _ _ (21 200 1, - - - - - - - - --------- _ _ - t..._. J 1 J CPT — 14 -7" SOLD BLO 14 al - - - �'TF-ttbLtp 26'n 26' •. 12 cork. NIT. BF 1 IBC PAO FOOTIr1Ci 0,4 WA WALL ON 6' CIRB CUz 9 e t e (0 - CPT INOLR QWM RIT LO D fv-n.( ABOVE Oil cONC FTC Fr! 1}tD 3 b 2.6 tt1T BEAR214 I .mi FPlS11LD 2- \ •��• + \VALL all 6' °I Q1�- `q _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ 24 CRT _ u ORB ml colt o CPT 2' -8" 16' -7' n rWHP1 FT4 Gi 4''0' 31' -2' p� o Lsrr zs -(2)jp 42 CIL 2, N -0 CPT 9 \\/ET E5AP- e T -3, 9 U v r 11' -11. T -Z, W-4' 13, 6" 6' -0' F - - - - ATJJ L _ 2_ Ferso - q r 2.4 BLARI - - - _ T �. ., ,� CL V EDRA� 7tS r \V Otl6 �' - CPT .. all c k. FT4 TP,e.p.{JZ5 c e RIRN L'.. J "T. 21 Be4 •,, 9v2 �sL - A L orl6' F.D. ry UTufY 26 (2) 9 V2' L5L JW ON rk FT4 - - Bb Efa TRg.{ - .., - Tx106P FOUbAT10P COTk. AVALLb orl X77 Ez' ,.. - /' 2�r t r r - call? cork' I. FT4s ma . CPT 2 -0 1 s -L 3 -- - r - - - -- - � ABOVL I , L I ' -- r - ------- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - � ----------- - - - - -� ; I i• I o r, - /R Q ni � -0I I I --_ -_ -_ _____- Ut,LtCAVATEV La`tMAVATED 8' -2' 9' -10" S.C. I 1 A g I I n 1 I I I 1 I I I SLAB LGDG1= I.)0. T __ _____ 1( °- OPtICI ______ _ ____ I I I I I I I 1 I __ 1 I I I 1 37' -0' ,60 O 0 ADADDJ15T FNWL \VALL WKUT OF 1100,- PER 113' DEL-P FLR U rm I.'IASTL �— B4T11z) -1 FOR RECLSSLD 5110 \VER FLR GENERAL NOTES: 23' -0" 9' -0' HIGH POURED CONC. FOUNDATION HEIGHT AND WIDTH AS NOTED REINFORCED AS REQUIRED A B • WALKOUT BASEMENT • REDUCE FLR JOIST DEPTH TO 18' UNDER MASTER BATHRM SHWRAREA Lo\\,Im Lp-yEL FLOOR PLAN ALL HEADERS ERRS T HEIGHT ) Z(10 7-10° (U O) • ALL HEADERS TO BE (2)2x10 TVP. (UNO) SCALE v4- - I-,Y PRESCRIPTIVE BRACED WALL LINE CALCULATION FOR: MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN (2nd LEVEL) AWN FLR FIN 3 25'A' 2 21'-0" 15 -0' 9811'clg U- = 4 =1 " GARAGE 5875F 1 CSWSP 21'-0' 3.65 1.0 1.3 1.05 1.45 722' 12' -0° 3,5 ** PER TABLE R602.10.4 SEE NOTE ** 2 GB& P GSWS 25 4" 8.37 1.0 1.3 1.05 1.45 16.48' 24' -0" 3 PER TABLE R602.10.4 9 GB8 CSWSP 25 -0° 8.37 f.0 t.3 .95 1.45 14.91' 23'-8° 3 PER TABLE R602.10.4 4 CSWSP 111-8' 2.25 1.0 1.3 .95 1.45 4.0Y 8' -0' 3 PER TABLE R602.10.4 PRESCRIPTIVE BRACED WALL LINE CALCULATION FOR: MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN (2nd LEVEL) - �o o; : B 15-0 9811'dg Ure 4 _ _ mom „=o A CS PF 34'-0' 5.4' 1.0 1.3 .95 1545 9.67' 12' -5' 1, 5 ** PER TBL R602.10.48 PER FIG. R602.10.6.4 -SEE DETAIL ON SHT 5 FOR CS PF * -SEE NOTE ** B GB8 CSWSP 15-4° 5.71' 1.0 1.3 .95 1.45 1p2Y x.7 =7.15 9 -0. 1 PER TABLE R602.10.4 4' O.C. FASTENING PER TBL R602.10.3(2) c CSWSP 34'-0 5.4' 1.0 1.3 1.05 1.45 10.68' 12' -0' 3,4 PER TABLE R602.10.4 0 CSWSP 21'-0' 3.65 1.0 1.3 1.05 1.45 722 10-61 1 PER TABLE R602.10.4 SEE PFG DETAIL ON SHEETAS * ** * CS PFPANELS CONTRIBUTE AS ACTUAL PER TBL R602 .10.5 ** PER END CONDITION /S, PROVIDE 800 lbs HOLD DOWN * ** PFG PANELS CONTRIBUTE X 1.5 PER Nota:2p -0° maximum spacing bet✓.een Braced Wal Panels PER FIGURE R602.10.7, END CONDITION #5 TBL R602.10.5- SEE DETAIL ON SHEET A5 " -A 0 `1 x 4 AWN FLR FIN 3 25'A' 2 21'-0" 3,046 IF 1 su\\ SCREEN PORCH FOYLR GARAGE 5875F 4 6 60' -0' GUN ROOM 1705F 2RZNgm6N w- 9 Cu; 5' -0" 16' -6" CLOAR V�L .,/IFTAL a n2, o 30 n 4\01 A--obu6 (2) TP � 4P 5CL5 -oR TR1>SS VADLT 14,_0, � q,_p. 2, -0, - - I g `JCREEN oRC11 J . �� CEDAR DCC{�61G' a/ m (Z) II l /B' L-5L DP.P I$e K1dTTY PPIE \V E CLG' (2) T1D,wab _ _ 36 n 72 Sll 36 n 72 FX 36 n 72 Sll ,. <sr re � > 10' JI - I (7,) 9 VZ -11- Ilse w .i A a (2) 30 n 2 - - -3" 7' -3" 7' -6" (2) 721. ,¢fLS T,W 7' -0" T -0' 1' -9' 4' -3" J-11 (2) II l /8' L DPP lkR = P' TPAILXA.1 ABOVL w TPa.W, 5 a n a 5P0 W� bTER ooM I 36 n 72 sll 6o n 2 fx 36 n 72 s Poef TQD55L5 N�N I e cL4 aox VAUL o ry 4RVFZ T2u55 �v /sGLw aLI�C, c.4 Lrb CPT _ 3o z 4 Su ® "Of I JES ' m 1 ; 14' -7" 13 -8' � (1J 2.N GKP ib2 E 24' x0. 5T611E I W OM F.o. DID 12'v BASE .a/P' So LP - 8' -2' 7' -10- b b CLG' eoX VAULT o 9 �A d \VD N I 244 1�3 .� a s ° e CoLld.p! Aco o G� I 0 15' -0" 4' -0" 8' -2" 5' -0' 4' -0' -8' I 13'-4" �' 9-O' aq - - - cll 2' 4' \V fREGOOE 6LL.TvocY orl Cvulq 0 �° d V- at-N .. I, o F LLL 1 E WaLLS LvilEO TAPL E aI 9n-4 r -- -- -TR I I mI � I (22 9 v2' LSL t>Lrz AA5 p¢C_rn Aa- G N _ q N ci vru (2) 36 72 50 000, j I WIC. n FS n I ATU 9 CL4 0 I ° z 9CL4 CT 1 9 I 4 CPT lo'a° LZLLAO ce 41 O U III N d va" I I b a4 � ✓� 2° v�r - - p ces o ' _ 2 21 5 -0" _ - 11' -4" 24' -8' L Y bTLIPS q" I 9fC 4 I CT o \VD CPT CT R 10' z- 9 CLy' 16' -6. 0 cT N -7" mu w-A� _^ - m } O 6' -6' 9' S' � 3 -7" 9 RS CT s 31 51 1^ i 37' -0" 1 23' -0° 25' -0" 4 3 GENERAL NOTES: 2 • 9' -1 1/e' PLATE HEIGHT TYP. (UNO) • NI NDOWROUGHOPENINGHEIGHT TO BE 8' -0" TYP. (UNO) • ALL HEADERS TO BE (2) 2x10 TYP. (UNO) 1 MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN jCALL: v4' - I -0' AREA CALCLLATWN° AWN FLR FIN . +, LOWER LEVEL FIN 1,298 SF - SID 3,046 IF LOWER FLR UNFIN su\\ SCREEN PORCH FOYLR GARAGE 5875F ENTRY PORCH 1585F GUN ROOM 1705F 2RZNgm6N w- 9 Cu; 7 oiwie a n2, o 30 n 4\01 (2) TP 1be - 10' JI w .i P- L50! ciwuu (2) 30 n 2 -2" J-11 _ Poef TQD55L5 N�N o ry 2a oC 16 ® "Of I JES (1J 2.N GKP ib2 24' x0. 5T611E I F.o. BASE .a/P' So LP - 8' -2' 7' -10- 9' -0- CoLld.p! Aco fREGOOE 6LL.TvocY orl Cvulq E WaLLS LvilEO TAPL 11' -0' 26' -0' I I I I I ° I KYn B2 o LZLLAO ce 37' -0" 1 23' -0° 25' -0" 4 3 GENERAL NOTES: 2 • 9' -1 1/e' PLATE HEIGHT TYP. (UNO) • NI NDOWROUGHOPENINGHEIGHT TO BE 8' -0" TYP. (UNO) • ALL HEADERS TO BE (2) 2x10 TYP. (UNO) 1 MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN jCALL: v4' - I -0' AREA CALCLLATWN° AWN FLR FIN 1,748 BF LOWER LEVEL FIN 1,298 SF 3,046 IF LOWER FLR UNFIN 410 IF SCREEN PORCH 208 IF GARAGE 5875F ENTRY PORCH 1585F GUN ROOM 1705F DECaNG - INSTALL PER MwT,R SPECS TREATED J019 FYI TREATED POST LEdqLz CoNNEcTwN SCALE r = I-9 POST EASE TREATED FLUSH HOR III -III III III iII- I III II! �I —III 5000 Pel CONC. POT u a III —III III. FOOTING -41° min. a ._.... -III._ -BELOW GRADE. _II! I'I_IIIE.III a� i III III- 1T� �a- III, -II PECK bEAwN DETAi� L.I - I_ :. -I SCALE: r = r -0' -��; m PER PLAN GENERAL NOTES. 78' O.H. @ EAVES TVP. (UNO) • 1T O.H. GABLE ENDS TVP. (UNO) • VENTILATE ROOF IN ACCORDANCE MCODES 50 % IN EAVE r l 50% IN UPPER I/3,d ATTIC • 8' min. HEEL a 12 8 12 4,12 V4UL_T — y9"-" TRUSS T SO %AULT V a �m a. Sox VAULT 3 l L 9 y a T4� m a a p P . a 12 P-00F P"N SCALE va' - L-9 \ ,/000 \VRAF7 \VOTE z xw \Vlbo \\ CGDAR 'A.51 T. SPIIDL (2) 212 6.6'v COIL L (5000 5Q_0\, SCALE: v4• - I -0' oq lBbEZLAI�•€JLT - v2' ROOT S S AS RGOD - 02'T Oc ROOT TRUSSES ®zaoc R WATE fvonq FASCIA Ta 2'o r,Fl BE_YOrb TLffi. sTR1r7Lvr TYP. LyuU s_ CLC, Cm151.. - e.fr� Q =49 e9LmJrl eI.su..°Tbr! - BRt= nTU°BLE. VAPOR BAQp DD - V2' STRm1G BOARD AN LEVEL EIIGL�ER6D WOOD JGLST. SIZE 1 SPACTJC' aS NIIITED - v2' sTRmJS BoAeD cE� R✓S TiFrb \VALE DETAIL. DATA _ m! sLt�T Lomlm LEVEL ° rr . PFOU A I \VALL COILS - cmTCRr =TE fooTR - W e LkJ RL °s NOTED RCBA LbA R aS REOD - ExTERY•2 1 V/A I�zocfxl4 F TypA ml \VALE - TYI 15126 AS NOTED RSBAR AS PLOD OD - I P-O o ATlm! tlslbADMI aN jl� EXTERIOR FACE Of Il WALL ZYv BASE .� T FLOOR CmLST• / AID - jvz'vo CLEAN Fp-0 FL-L - R °DOLNTNLC- QY�si1EJd ®faoTRJG PERR4ETER 1TW' Ysf FfiR CODES WALL `JECTION 'C' ,SCALL Vz - f -c lL B F. 2' t F 18' FINISHED WIDTH OF OPENING 81NGLE OR DOUG P RT�L M DOUBLE 2x4 POST T (KIN'G / JACK STUD). NUMBER OF JACK STUDS min 3 °x 11.25° NET HEADER STEEL NOR PROHIBITED 502.5(U / (2 PER TABLES R502.5(0045 TENSION STRAP PER / FASTEN SHEATHING TO HEADER m/Bd COMMON OR GALVANIZED TABLE 8601.10.6,4 - -L BOX NAILS IN 3° GRm PATTERN (ON OPPOSITE SIDE i I, A9 SHOWN III OF SHEATHNG) HEADER TO JACKSTUD STRAP 3 0 86.10.6.4 ON BOTH PER TABLE 02 TYPICAL PORTAL FRAMING - FU I; NOES OF OPENING OPPOSITE CONSTRUCTION _ S , I SIDE OF SHEATHING I 3 �( MIN. DOUBLE 2x4 FRAMING COVERED FOR A PANEL SPLICE (IF Q X W 6 WITH MIN. VI THICK WOOD NEEDED), EDGES SHALL L Y STRUCURAL PANEL SHEATHING rVBd OCCUR 1 BE ATTACHED O COMMON OR GALVANIZED BOX TO COMMON BLOCKING -- NAILS • 3° O.C. IN ALL FRAMING WITHIN 24° OF WALL MID -HGHT (STUDS, BLOCKING t BILL6) TYP, ONE ROW OF 3' O.C. NAILING i LS RE&D IN EA. PANEL EDGE MIN. LENGTH OF PANEL I. PER TABLE 8601,10.5 I, INTERMITTENT BRACKED WALL PANEL PANEL REQUIRED ADJACENT OPENING FOR SINGLE •I I PORTAL FRAME . "VE COILS REf)D BASE HEEL Off OF AA2 RTCU " /8',µ LIL_EL - 42 DAFFLL. BE. ml C-VERY TRUSS - VERFY scFfTT /Fascia - Aw.tlLOUS VEIIfA_ soFFri - ALU.TI -wTFT / fasnA Z,6 sj1IDS 6.5 Oc Tfl_gA1T °s - VAP f�R4L -°SS GATT RISLLATTc - VAPO(L BARRIER - v2' qYP51l,1 WALLBOARD TYP RRA ARGA cm1ST SEE DCT°L ml SIkFT \VAT Z RZOOf COATRI4' fRm,i (gRADC TO TOP of foaTek' - TYP 'CS LOWER LEVEL : PIAN FOR \VAL'COIIT -p slJm Lk ) 42 ANCHOR BOLTS PER SECTION R403,1.6 MIN, (2) 12° DIA. ANCHOR BOLT INSTALLED PER SECTION R403.1.6 - U/2° x 2° x 3/16° PLATE WASHER d 3 i I MK DOUBLE 2x4 POST I (KING / JACK STIID), N1M 13ER OF JACK STUDS FASTEN TOP PLATE min 3 °x 11.15° NE( HEADER PER TABLES 1 TO HEADER m/(1) ROLLS STEEL 4DR PROHlBrrED R507.5(U 1 S OF U' d SINKER NAILS - FASTEN SHEATHING TO HEADER' -J -'- • 3° O,C. TYP. eil0d COMMON OR GALVANIZED TENSION STRAP PER 0 BOX NAILS IN 3° GRID PATTERN TABLE R6MJ0.6.4 i AS SHOWN (ON OPPOSITE SIDE III OF SHEATHING) HEADER TO JACK-5TUD STRAP PER TABLE R602,10.6.4 ON BOTH 'i•i TYPICAL PORTAL FRAMING SIDES OF OPENING OPPOSITE CONSTRUCTION� BIDE OF SHEATHING X J( °MIN. DOUBLE 7x4 FRAMING COVERED FOR A PANEL SPLICE (IF i WITH MN. Vt6° THICK WOOD NEEDED), EDGES SHALL III _ O !i STRUCIRAL PANEL SHEATHING WSd OCCUR 1 BE ATTACHED ICI COMMON OR GALVANIZED BOX TO COMMON BLOCKING NAILS a 3° O.C. IN ALL FRAMING WITHIN 24° OF WALL MID446HT :I it II i I (STUDS, BLOCKING / 01LL67 TYP. ONE ROW OF 3° O.C. NAILING 'i B REQb IN EA. PANEL EDGE MIN. V16° WOOD 'i MIN. LENGTH OF PANEL STRUCTURAL PER TABLE R602.10.5 fl PANEL SHEATHING ] ri'I •I 'I MIN. (2) V2° DIAMETER ANCHOR ANCHOR BOLTS PER YI BOLTS INSTALLED PER R403.1.6 W SECTION R40316 !II I;i 1 °x2 °x3 /I6° PLATE WASHER fl PFG MORTAL Q G'ARAG'E WALL FRAMING RETAIL PER IRC FIG, R&O2.IO.6,3 .)CALL: NT6 METHOD PPG - PORTAL FRAME AT GARAGE DOOR - tnl�.xnc Txl�u -.xe. w.nl v - APL 2ETA2DER LLJLLSE_ \VRAP 7116' OSB \VALL SlkajlJRlG - OVER CONCRETE OR MASONRY 6LOCIC FOUNDATION NAIL SOLE PLATE TO JOIST PER TABLE R602.3(I) WOOD STRUCTURAL (2) FRAMING ANCHORS PANEL SHEATHING APPLIED AGRO55- CONTINUOUS OVER SHEATHING JOINT BAND OR RIM JOIST ./CAPACITY OF 610lb6 IN THE HORIZONTAL 1 VERTICAL r DIRECTIONS L FASTEN TOP PLATE TO HEADER m/(2) ROWS OF I6d SINKER NAILS s 3° O.C. TYP, MIN, -vib, WOOD STRUCTURAL PANEL 6WEATHING NAIL SOLE PLATE TO JOIST PER TABLE R602.3(I) -WOOD STRUCTURAL PANEL SHEATHING OVER APPROVED BAND OR RIM JOIST -.j APPROVED BAND OR RIM JOIST OVER RAISED \VOOD FLOOR - FRAMING• MLal R OPTION (wltN PORTAL SLGATa''K DOGS NOT LAP OVER BANb OR RN4 BOARD) NAIL SOLE PLATE TO JOIST °I PER TABLE R602.3(I) WOOD STRUCTURAL ATTACH SHEATHING PANEL SHEATHING TO BAND OR RIM CONTINUOUS OVER JOIST w.Bd COMMON ,I; NAIL SOLE PLATE BAND OR RIM JOIST NAILS c 3" O,C, TO JOIST PER TOP 1 BOTTOM TABLE R602.3(U `WOOD STRUCTURAL PANEL SHEATHING OVER APPROVED BAND OR RIM J015T -1J APPROVED BAND OVER RAISED \VOOD FLOOR - OVERLAP OPTION OR RIM olsr ( \VLtN PORTAL sl"71W LAPS 'VEll BAND oR Red So.) C5 -PF PORTAL \V ALL FRAt4NCg PP -TAILS PER IRC FIG, 8602,10.6,4 SCALE NT-5 METHOD CS-PP - PORTAL FRAME CONTINUOUSLY SHEATHED Marie Darling From: Marie Darling Sent: Monday, December 10, 2018 12:22 PM To: The Holmgrens; Planning Subject: RE: Question regarding recent hearing - Green Wood Design Build - 23825 Lawtonka Thank you for your comments. I've included an answer to each item below (in red). I'll include your email and the responses with the report sent to the City Council. Please let me know if you have any other questions. 'Il r * Dagarf Planning Director 952 - 960 -7912 mdarlina(a)ci. shore wood. mn. us City of Shorewood 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, MN 55331 MN Data Practices Notification: Pursuant to MN Data, Practices Chapter 13 all government data including email communications is presumed to be public unless there is a specific state statute, federal law, or temporary classification that classifies it otherwise. Cl'IY U1. SI-iOREWOOD www.ci.shorewood.mn.us - - - -- Original Message---- - From: The Holmgrens [mailto:tholmgren @mchsi.com] Sent: Friday, December 7, 2018 9:11 PM To: Planning <Planning @ci.shorewood.mn.us> Subject: Question regarding recent hearing - Green Wood Design Build - 23825 Lawtonka Dear Planning Commission, We have a couple of questions after the hearing. We didn't realize we had only one time to speak or ask questions. Following are our questions: 1. We are very concerned about a filtration pond next to our property line. We are concerned about the aesthetics along with stagnant water and attracting mosquitoes, etc. Is it possible to require a fence so we cannot see the filtration drainage? Filtration basins are not ponds; they are designed to hold water for a short times to slow the amount of water running off the site. The should be holding water for very short times. You may recall seeing the conditions about the depth of the basin based on the type of soil present in the engineer's memo. A fence is a reasonable condition and may be considered by the Council. 2. With significant alteration to the landscape, will it have an impact on our well or drainage on our property? The only neighbors considered in the discussion before our comments were the neighbors in the townhome development. Not likely to impact your well as it is likely much deeper than the alteration proposed, but you may want to contact the Minnesota Department of Health with this question as wells are under their jurisdiction and they may have more information on this topic. These homes would be required to connect to municipal water. 3. During the meeting, it was acknowledged that a significant number of big trees are being destroyed. We are long time residents of Shorewood, and would like to make sure that trees are replanted on the property. What are the plans? Based on the amount of removal, six trees would be required to be planted. The developer could plant extras and the City Council could require additional. 4. Why is an exception made for a builder when clearly residents are concerned? The exception according the hearing notice indicated that the builder is asking for reduced lot sizes. The builder said during the meeting that he knew there was a possibility that they may only get approval for a single family home. That is a much more acceptable outcome to us and reduces the carbon footprint. Please help us understand why an exception was made for a builder? Is it purely revenue? • When I first met with the developer, I suggested a twin -home consistent with the other homes on the cul -de- sac. They proposed to split the twinhome and build two homes instead. The impact on the neighborhood from a twinhome or two single - family homes are very similar. • A single - family home is not likely to have a smaller footprint. Most new single family homes on lots are building to the maximum amount of coverage possible. Even if the initial home doesn't max out the footprint, the additional outdoor entertainment areas, pools and accessory buildings that many homeowners add after the fact certainly do. • 1 don't have enough information either way on which would produce a smaller carbon footprint, but most articles on reducing carbon footprint point to greater density rather than lesser. • Revenue is not an issue for zoning. 5. It also seems that a significant amount of work was done by the planning commission prior to this meeting and the recommendation was to approve the exception. Why was so much work done before the public hearing when there were questions about why the property was zoned PUD when it was intended to be a buffer lot? This appears to be a mistake. It doesn't seem like our feedback mattered and was a waste of time. Why weren't residents brought into the equation earlier? It appears there was a mistake in the zoning. So when there is doubt, why make an exception? • The Planning Commission did not do any work on this application prior to distribution of the report for this meeting. They received the report the Friday before the meeting and the public also had access to the report at the same time. After the report was distributed, most of the members review the report and stop by the site. • The City's professional staff (me, the engineer, and the building official) began our review of the application after the applicant submitted enough information to begin our review, starting in late October. This work is done prior to the meeting so that the Planning Commission can make an informed recommendation. • The history does not indicate that this lot would be held as open space as was required for the lot to the east. Only that the owner at the time wanted to use it as a buffer. The original Gideon Cove concept plan showed a twinhome and there was discussion during the concept and development stages of the Gideon Cove PUD to rezone the subject property to R -2A if it was not part of the PUD, but that rezoning never occurred. • The lot was included in the PUD zone, but not in the Gideon Cove development. The zoning map has shown the PUD zoning since 1992. • Some residents stopped in to talk to me about potential development the moment they heard the property was being placed on the market. They asked about process, potential development, likely outcomes, etc. They called me from time to time to find out whether an application was submitted, what was proposed, etc. After the application was submitted, they stopped in to look at the plans. The plans and all the information is open to 7 the public the moment it is submitted. Staff notifies the public as required by the PUD ordinance, which includes a public notice in the paper and a letter about 10 days prior to the meeting. Public input is never a waste of time. If you disagree with the staff or Planning Commission recommendation and the related impact on the neighborhood, please come to the City Council meeting and request to speak regarding your concerns. Sincerely, Denise & Thor Holmgren 612- 719 -4253 From: The Holmgrens <tholmgren @mchsi.com> Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2019 3:59 PM To: Marie Darling Cc: Planning Subject: RE: Question regarding recent hearing - Green Wood Design Build - 23825 Lawtonka Marie, Thank you for your 12/10 response to our email. After reading your response and doing some research, there appear to be two alternatives that should be considered: Re -zone the lot R -2A — There were questions about the current PUD designation at the planning meeting; however, changing the designation was not discussed. If the previous owner of our home intended the lot to be a buffer zone, why wasn't the lot designated R- 2A at the time the subdivision was finalized? The minimum size lot for a twin home on a R -2A lot is 30,000 square feet. The lot is 28,000 square feet square feet; therefore, only a single - family home would be allowed. The purchaser of the lot stated that he was aware of this possible outcome at the planning meeting. The positives would be two fewer vehicles, less waste, less delivery /commercial traffic, and possibly, a better outcome for all neighbors. As you point out, the footprint of a single - family home may consume the same 25% of the surface area as the two proposed villas, and the structure may be taller. Move forward with the current plan— The current plan supported by the planning commission will significantly alter the greenspace and the neighborhood surrounding the pond that drains directly into Lake Minnetonka. The plan utilizes the maximum amount of impervious surface area, includes the removal of many mature trees (including some very large maple trees), and it involves significant re- grading and the sculpting of an unnatural drainage pit. I encourage you visit the property and assess how the current plans will radically change the lot. The only positive from our perspective is that the proposed villas are one level structures. If the current plan moves forward, we would like the planning commission to require a fence or a well- designed tree barrier to insulate us from the planned unit development on a lot that was intended to be a buffer zone. We also feel the planning commission should carefully scrutinize the tree removal and the plan to plant trees on the lot. Thank you for your consideration. Thor & Denise Holmgren Marie Darling From: Marie Darling Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2018 5:24 PM To: 'Sherol Christian' Cc: Patti Helgesen Subject: RE: 23825 Lawtonka Drive Certainly, see my answers to the questions are below in red. The City Council meeting on this item is currently scheduled for January 14, 2019. Let me know if you have any other questions. Una vm&ap Planning Director 952- 960 -7912 mdarlina (@ci. shore wood. mn, us City of Shorewood 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, MN 55331 MN Data Practices Notification: Pursuant to MN Data Practices Chapter 13 all government data including email communications is presumed to be public unless there is a specific state statute, federal law, or temporary classification that classifies it otherwise. CCIY 01' SI IOREWOOD www.ci.shorewood.mn.us - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Sherol Christian [mailto:srchristian @q.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2018 3:23 PM To: Planning <Planning @ci.shorewood.mn.us> Cc: srchristian <srchristian @q.com> Subject: 23825 Lawtonka Drive Hi Marie, Since I was not able to attend this meeting, what was the responses to the issues I raised below? Sherol Christian - - - -- Forwarded Message - - - -- From: "srchristian" < srchristian @q.com> To: planning @ci.shorewood.mn.us Cc: "srchristian" <srchristian @q.com> Sent: Tuesday, December 4, 2018 12:17:52 PM Subject: 23825 Lawtonka Drive Attn: Marie Darling, Planning Director with the City of Shorewood, To follow up on our conversation this morning and in response to the Public Hearing Notice, I'm writing to inform the City of Shorewood that I am not in support of splitting the lot 23825 Lawtonka Drive into two lots. I live at 23800 Lawtonka Drive across from this parcel of land on the cul -de -sac and my view will be directly impacted by this development plan. Listed below are my concerns: 1). The removal of so many trees and loss of green space to accommodate these two single family units is huge concern for me. Not only will this impact our view and nature, it will impact our privacy and most importantly it will increase the noise level from county road 19. Although the view of the parcel will change, you will not necessarily notice an increased noise from CR 19. Trees do not provide the noise mitigation that they are credited with. The structures will be a better noise barrier than the trees. 2). It is a very narrow space between our mailboxes and the utility box next to 23820. And, although they are proposing one driveway with a split between the two units what is there plan for mailboxes for these two units? Given how narrow that space is I can't imagine there will be enough space for their two mailboxes. Normally we do not see this level of detail with the development application. The applicant will have to work this issue out with the post office. 3). With their plan to build two single family unit structures as opposed to one twin home structure will this increase the volume of construction and vendor vehicles on Lawtonka Drive? The construction process will already be a major inconvenience for our community, and to double the amount of vehicles and workers to build these two units will compound our construction concerns. The construction may last longer as they would likely build one dwelling and building the second at a later time. 4). This fourth issue is for the City of Shorewood. The snow plow trucks normally push the show up on that parcel of land, so with this development where will they put the snow from the cul -de -sac? We do not want it pushed up on our twin -home lawns, that has been a problem in the past where the snow and salt ruined our lawns and broke off some sprinkler heads. Fyi, when they pushed the snow to the area left of our mailboxes they hit /broke the the light pole which had to be replaced. The open space outlot will likely be the snow storage location. The public works department staff note that the snow will be pushed around the cul -de -sac, so some snow will get placed in driveways and front yards, the same as with any other cul -de -sac. I believe this captured the essence of our conversation this morning. Thank you for listening to my concerns. I look forward to hearing the outcome of this planning commission meeting. Sherol Christian 23800 Lawtonka Drive Shorewood, Mn 55331 From: Camille Schroeder <pacam @mchsi.com> Sent: Monday, December 03, 2018 8:08 PM To: Marie Darling Cc: Andrew /Kristen Zeller -Hack; Bob /KrisAnn Ditmore; bret @ecreativeworks.com; bret @olseth.com; Dan /Mary O'Keefe; Dan /Mary O'Keefe; Dean /Geri Meek; Dean /Geri Meek; James Santelli; Lynne Ditmore; nmlinder @gmail.com; pacam @mchsi.com; Patricia ; slinder @kwlm.com; srchristian @q.com; tthiss @aol.com Subject: RE: Planning committee questions Thank you for this. See you tomorrow night. Please do make my email and your responses available to the Planning Commission. Whatever you think is best for the process. Camille From: Marie Darling [ mailto :MDarling@ci.shorewood.mn.us] Sent: Monday, December 03, 2018 5:53 PM To: Camille Schroeder Cc: Andrew /Kristen Zeller -Hack; Bob /KrisAnn Ditmore; bret@ecreativeworks.com; bret@olseth.com; Dan /Mary O'Keefe; Dan /Mary O'Keefe; Dean /Geri Meek; Dean /Geri Meek; James Santelli; Lynne Ditmore; nmlinder@gmail.com; Patricia ; slinder@kwlm.com; srchristian@q.com; tthiss @aol.com Subject: RE: Planning committee questions Please see my responses (in red) below. I can make your email and my responses available to the Planning Commission and the developer in your absence. Let me know if you have any additional questions after reading my responses. I'm about to leave for the day, but I'll be in the office tomorrow. *44a r"aff Planning Director 952 - 960 -7912 mdarlin4 @ci. shore wood. mn. us City of Shorewood 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, MN 55331 MN Data Practices Notification: Pursuant to MN Data Practices Chapter 13 all government data including email communications is presumed to be public unless there is a specific state statute, federal law, or temporary classification that classifies it otherwise. i; VV OF SHOREWOOD www.ci.shorewood.mn.us From: Camille Schroeder [mailto:pacam @mchsi.com] Sent: Monday, December 3, 2018 5:10 PM To: Marie Darling <MDarling @ci.shorewood.mn.us> Cc: Andrew /Kristen Zeller -Hack <hackzeller @com cast. net >; Bob /KrisAnn Ditmore <ditmores @comcast.net >; bret @ecreativeworks.com; bret @olseth.com; Dan /Mary O'Keefe <danokeefemn @gmail.com >; Dan /Mary O'Keefe <marytokeefe @gmail.com >; Dean /Geri Meek <deanmeek @hotmail.com >; Dean /Geri Meek <gerimeek @gmail.com >; James Santelli <jpsantelli @gmail.com >; Lynne Ditmore <Iditmore @att.net >; nmlinder @gmail.com; pacam @mchsi.com; Patricia <pmccracken000 @gmail.com >; slinder @kwlm.com; srchristian @q.com; tthiss @aol.com Subject: Planning committee questions Hi Marie, I'm sorry I didn't get to speak with you today so will give you a list of the questions we have for the planning commission concerning the building on the Gideon Cove lot on Lawtonka Drive. We would like to know: The approximate construction dates The developer would like to begin as soon as possible assuming the project is approved. If the Council approves the plan, it may take several weeks to complete the conditions of approval. The days and hours of work The ordinance allows construction during the following days and hours: M -F: 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. Sat: 8 a.m. to 6 p.m. No construction on Sunday. If there will be a daily cleanup Streets must be kept clean. That may mean daily or weekly sweepings depending on the stage of construction. This doesn't mean that there will never be any dirt on the street, but there shouldn't be big clods or layers of dirt and /or mud. If there is a plan for parking trucks, etc. Not yet. Usually this occurs with the building permit request. With the exception of the mailbox area, the south side of Lawtonka Drive looks like the obvious spot. Where the port -potty will be located Same answer as above. If the streets will be kept clean, ie: mud, snow, ice The developer is required to keep the streets clean during construction (based on the determination of the Building Official) and the City is responsible for plowing the streets — same as usual. What the plan is regarding trees: which ones will be removed and will new mature trees be planted in place of those removed At this point, the developer's plans for tree removal conflict between the grading, survey and tree preservation plan. The grading plan indicates most would be removed and the other plans show some would be saved. The developer and I discussed tree removal this morning and he is going to work on this issue between the Planning Commission meeting and the City Council meeting as there are some trees that could be saved. They will be planting a minimum of three new trees per lot. In addition: Could there be barrier trees planted between 23820 and the new home for privacy? Attached is the staff report and plans for the proposed development. Based on the home's distance to the property line, I don't think there is room for a row of trees to be constructed along the property line. The area within the first 10 feet is a drainage and utility easement and the development may need to grade in a swale for drainage purposes. A row of trees up against the property line could interfere with proper drainage. However, there may be room for a couple of trees on the north side as space allows. Is there a phone number that we could use to access the contractor during construction if need be? I'm sure there will be during the construction process. The building permit application requires a phone number and that information is public. The street beside the mailboxes must be kept open until the mail is delivered each day Noted. That's what we have. I have a funeral on Tuesday morning but I should be home shortly after noon. Answers by email or phone will work for me. My phone number is 952 - 470 -5730 and my email is pacam @mchsi.com. Several of the Gideon Cove homeowners association will be at the meeting tomorrow night at 7:00. Many thanks. Camille Schroeder 4 ORDINANCE 562 CITY OF SHOREWOOD COUNTY OF HENNEPIN STATE OF MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE APPROVING THE LAWTONKA VILLAS PUD Section 1. Section 1201.09 Subd. 2. of the Shorewood City Code the "Zoning Map of Shorewood" was previously amended to include the property legally described as: Lot 6, Block 1, Lawtonka, City of Shorewood, Hennepin County, Minnesota. in the PUD (Planned Unit Development) zoning district. Section 2. Greenwood Design Build, LLC. has requested concept and development stage plan approval for a planned unit development to be called Lawtonka Villas to develop the property with two single - family homes. Section 3. Lawtonka Villas PUD shall be subject to the conditions in Resolution 19 -014. Section 4. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon publishing in the Official Newspapers of the City of Shorewood. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA this 28th day of January, 2019. SCOTT ZERBY, MAYOR ATTEST: SANDIE THONE, CITY CLERK RESOLUTION 19- CITY OF SHOREWOOD COUNTY OF HENNEPIN STATE OF MINNESOTA A RESOLUTION GRANTING CONCEPT AND DEVELOPMENT STAGE PLAN APPROVAL FOR THE LAWTONKA VILLAS P.U.D. WHEREAS, Greenwood Design Build, LLC. (Applicant) has requested a Concept and Development Stage Plan for a residential Planned Unit Development (P.U.D.) to be known as Lawtonka Villas on property legally described as: Lot 6, Block 1, Lawtonka, City of Shorewood, Hennepin County, Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the Applicant's request dated September 24, October 29, and November 26, 2018 and January 9, 2019 was reviewed by the Planning Director, whose memo was forwarded to the Planning Commission for their meeting on December 4, 2018, a copy of the memo is on file at the Shorewood City Hall; and WHEREAS, the application was considered by the Planning Commission at a regular meeting held on December 4, 2018, the minutes of which meeting are on file at City Hall; and WHEREAS, the City Council considered the application at its regular meeting on January 28, 2019, at which time the Planning Director's memorandum and the Planning Commission's recommendations were reviewed and comments were heard by the Council from the Applicant and from the City staff. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA AS FOLLOWS: The Applicant's request for Concept and Development Stage Plan for Lawtonka Villas PUD is hereby approved according to the plans submitted September 24, 2018 and January 9, 2019, subject to the following conditions: a. The PUD shall consist of two single - family homes and the allowed accessory uses listed in the R -1 B zoning district. b. All structures in the PUD shall meet the following setbacks and height restrictions, subject to the definitions in City Code: 1) Front property line: 30 feet 2) North property line of Parcel A and east property line of Parcel B: 10 feet 3) Shared property line: 5 feet 4) Rear: 40 feet 5) Wetland Buffer: 15 feet 6) Height: 30 feet, which shall include no more than one story over a walkout basement c. Each lot shall be limited to 25 percent impervious surface coverage. d. For the initial construction, the siding materials and colors shall be compatible with the siding materials and colors of the homes within the Gideon Cove PUD. The homes in Lawtonka Villas shall remain consistent with each other. 2. Prior to construction of the second home, the applicant shall provide proof of recording for the minor subdivision and all related documents. 3. No construction or demolition may occur without the applicable building and right - of -way permits. 4. Both homes shall be connected to municipal water. 5. Except as approved above, all construction must be consistent with City Code. 6. Both homes shall use the same garbage and recycling hauler. 7. Prior to issuance of any building permits, the applicant shall complete the following: a. Submit any unpaid fees as required by the subdivision. b. Submit building permit plans in conformance with all city and state requirements. c. Submit a construction management plan for each lot, detailing where workers will park, how deliveries will be made without blocking public streets, where storage of materials will occur, hours of construction and how often streets will be swept. d. Revise the plans to indicate all disturbance within the wetland buffer shall be restored with an approved wetland buffer mix. e. Revise the plans or submit the documents indicated in the City Engineer's memos dated January 18 and 28, 2019. f. Revise the grading plan to add the wetland buffers as indicated on the survey submitted January 9, 2019. g. Surveys submitted for new construction shall include wetland buffers, retaining walls and cantilevers in addition to the information required by City Code. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA this 28th day of January, 2019. Scott Zerby, Mayor ATTEST: Sandie Thone, City Clerk RESOLUTION 19- CITY OF SHOREWOOD COUNTY OF HENNEPIN STATE OF MINNESOTA A RESOLUTION APPROVING SUBDIVISION OF PROPERTY FOR GREENWOOD DESIGN BUILD, LLC. FOR 23825 LAWTONKA DRIVE WHEREAS, Greenwood Design Build, LLC. (Applicant) is the owner of certain real property in the City of Shorewood, legally described as: Lot 6, Block 1, Lawtonka, City of Shorewood, Hennepin County, Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the Applicant has applied to the City for a subdivision of said real property into two parcels legally described and illustrated in Exhibit A, attached hereto and made a part hereof; and WHEREAS, the Applicant's request dated September 24, October 29, and November 26, 2018 and January 9, 2019 was reviewed by the Planning Director, whose memo was forwarded to the Planning Commission for their meeting on December 4, 2018, a copy of the memo is on file at the Shorewood City Hall; and WHEREAS, the application was considered by the Planning Commission at a regular meeting held on December 4, 2018, the minutes of which meeting are on file at City Hall; and WHEREAS, the City Council considered the application at its regular meeting on January 28, 2019, at which time the Planning Director's memorandum and the Planning Commission's recommendations were reviewed and comments were heard by the Council from the Applicant and from the City staff. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Shorewood as follows- 1 . The property legally described above is hereby approved for division into two parcels, legally described and illustrated in Exhibit A. 2. The subdivision approval is subject to the requirements of the Lawtonka Villas PUD as indicated in Resolution 19- and the following conditions: a. Prior to recording the subdivision, the applicant shall submit the following consistent with City Code: 1) Executed conservation easements over the wetland and wetland buffers; a 5 -foot drainage and utility easement along both sides of the shared property line between the two properties; a driveway easement for the -1- shared portion of the driveway; and a maintenance agreement for the shared rain garden. 2) A title report for the property. 3) Payment of the following fees: Park dedication: $6,500 and LSSAC: $1,200 and water connection fees of $20,000. b. Prior to recording the subdivision, the applicant shall remove all existing accessory structures from the property and request an inspection to verify compliance. c. No construction or demolition may occur without the applicable permits. 3. The Applicant shall record this resolution and the easements with the Hennepin County Recorder or Registrar of Titles within thirty (30) days of the date of the certification of this resolution. 4. The City Clerk will furnish the Applicant with a certified copy of this resolution for recording purposes when the above conditions are satisfied. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA this 28th day of January, 2019. ATTEST: Sandie Thone, City Clerk -2- Scott Zerby, Mayor Exhibit A: Legal description for Parcel A: Lot 6, Block 1, Lawtonka, City of Shorewood, Hennepin County, Minnesota lying northwesterly of the following described lines; Commencing at the northwest corner of the said Lot 6; thence south 00 degrees, 35 minutes, 00 seconds east, along the west line of said Lot 6, a distance of 179.00 feet to the southwest corner of said Lot 6 and the point of beginning of the lines to be described; thence north 38 degrees, 31 minutes, 04 seconds east, a distance of 113.49 feet; thence north 51 degrees, 16 minutes, 27 seconds east, a distance of 112.86 feet to the northeasterly line of said Lot 6 and there terminating. Together with an easement for drainage and utility purposes over and across the southeasterly 5.00 feet of the above described property. Legal description of Parcel B: Lot 6, Block 1, Lawtonka, City of Shorewood, Hennepin County, Minnesota lying southeasterly of the following described lines; Commencing at the northwest corner of the said Lot 6; thence south 00 degrees, 35 minutes, 00 seconds east, along the west line of said Lot 6, a distance of 179.00 feet to the southwest corner of said Lot 6 and the point of beginning of the lines to be described; thence north 38 degrees, 31 minutes, 04 seconds east, a distance of 113.49 feet; thence north 51 degrees, 16 minutes, 27 seconds east, a distance of 112.86 feet to the northeasterly line of said Lot 6 and there terminating. Together with an easement for drainage and utility purposes over and across the northwesterly 5.00 feet of the above described property. -3- CITY OF SHOREWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING TUESDAY, DECEMBER 4, 2018 MINUTES CALL TO ORDER Chair Maddy called the meeting to order at 7:01 P.M. ROLL CALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD 7:00 P.M. Present: Chair Maddy; Commissioners Eggenberger, Davis, Riedel and Gorham; Planning Director Darling; and, Council Liaison Johnson Absent: None 1. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Davis moved, Riedel seconded, approving the agenda for December 4, 2018, as presented. Motion passed 510. 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES November 20, 2018 Davis moved, Riedel seconded, approving the Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of November 20, 2018, as presented. Motion passed 510. 3. PUBLIC HEARINGS Chair Maddy explained the Planning Commission is comprised of residents of the City of Shorewood who are serving as volunteers on the Commission. The Commissioners are appointed by the City Council. The Commission's role is to help the City Council in determining zoning and planning issues. One of the Commission's responsibilities is to hold public hearings and to help develop the factual record for an application and to make a non - binding recommendation to the City Council. The recommendation is advisory only. A. PUBLIC HEARING — PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AND MINOR SUBDIVISION Applicant: Greenwood Design Build, LLC (Doug Cutting) Location: 23825 Lawtonka Drive Director Darling explained that Greenwood Design Build has requested a minor subdivision and Planned Unit Development (PUD) for Lawtonka Villas to create two single family homes at 23825 Lawtonka Drive. The subject property is located at the end of the cul -de -sac. She noted that the properties to the north are developed with twin family homes and the homes to the south are single family homes. She explained the location of a wetland area and noted that the applicant may be required to create wetland buffers on -site and structures would be subject to a 15 -foot setback. She explained that this lot was rezoned to PUD in 1992 when the other lots in the area were developed. She gave a brief overview of the grading and stormwater run off plans. CITY OF SHOREWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DECEMBER 4, 2018 Page 2 of 5 Commissioner Riedel asked for clarification about the history of the property being zoned PUD. Director Darling stated that the history of this parcel is very interesting and explained that the entire cul- de -sac was originally created with R -lA lots. After the plat was recorded, the developer decided they wanted to put in twin homes instead and two nearby properties, including the one being discussed tonight were owned by a different parry and were not developed as twin homes, but were rezoned to PUD at the same time as the twin home development. Commissioner Riedell asked why a PUD plan was required if the lot is already zoned PUD. Director Darling explained that although it is zoned PUD, there was never a development plan for the property. She stated that she believes it may have been a mistake to lump this property in with the twin homes in rezoning it to PUD. She gave a brief overview of the layout of the property and the lot sizes. She noted that there have been two letters received from residents on the cul -de -sac and noted that most of their concerns had been addressed in the staff response. Staff is recommending approval of both the PUD and the minor subdivision with the conditions as outlined in the staff report. Chair Maddy noted that in looking at the zoning map it appears as though the City created an orphan lot years ago and is now being requested to straighten it out. He asked why the lot was not just zoned R -2A to match what the zoning is in the surrounding area. Director Darling stated that she was not sure why this parcel was included in the PUD zoning rather than left as the original R -lA. She stated that changing the zoning to R -2A would probably require some variances for development. Commissioner Riedel asked how the Commission should move forward with consideration of materials used because these homes will be entering into an existing PUD as an outsider, but yet also part of the same development. Director Darling explained that the developer did propose including some gables in the design to help it blend in, but noted that it will not match the twin homes because construction styles have changed since 1992. The Commission discussed the PUD zoning and the R -IA zoning requirements. Doug Cutting, co -owner of Greenwood Design Build, explained that when they were looking at purchasing this lot, they were also confused by the zoning designation and noted that their backup plan was to build a single - family home on the lot. He stated that given the context of what already exists on the street with the twin homes, they felt two villa style homes would be a better fit. Commissioner Riedel confirmed that this property would not have lake access like the nearby properties do. Commissioner Gorham asked the applicant to discuss the changes in the landscape plan. Mr. Cutting stated that there are about 30 trees on the property that are considered substantial and noted that about 12 -14 of them are on the perimeter and will not be affected by the grading. He stated that the ones that are in the center would not survive the necessary grading. Commissioner Riedel confirmed that the plans were to take down a mature tree in order to put in a rain garden. CITY OF SHOREWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DECEMBER 4, 2018 Page 3 of 5 Chair Maddy opened the Public Testimony portion of the Public Hearing at 7:27 P.M. Thor Holmgren, 23880 Smithtown Road, stated that he strongly opposes the subdivision because it is literally the back yard for his home. He expressed his concerns and the reasons for his opposition. He stated that when they bought their home there were told it was a single - family home and are shocked to hear the talk of a PUD and the subdivision as this property was intended to be a buffer between the town homes and his home. Commissioner Riedel asked what part of the grading and drainage plan Mr. Holmgren would like to see changed. Mr. Holmgren stated that he didn't think anything should be done to the lot because it provides greenspace. He stated that his understanding is that the oldest maple tree in the City is located on this lot and will be taken out for this project. Commissioner Riedel stated that he also has concerns about taking out the old sugar maple in the center of the lot. He stated that the City has a policy that with any new development, stormwater run off is absorbed on site which means there needs to be a large infiltration basin, but if that means taking out mature trees, he feels this is a regrettable trade -off. There being no additional comment, Chair Maddy closed the Public Testimony portion of the Public Hearing at 7:32 P.M. Commissioner Davis asked if a tree inventory had been performed by an arborist. Director Darling stated there is a tree inventory and noted when an arborist was on -site, they discovered additional trees that were not on the survey. She stated that they showed 25 significant trees located on the site. Chair Maddy asked how many of the significant trees were slated for removal. Director Darling stated that the developer has indicated that they can save roughly half of the significant trees, but none of the trees in the middle where the building pads or rain garden would be saved. Commissioner Davis asked if the plans were saving the trees worth saving. Mr. Cutting stated that the trees marked for the arborist for saving were all deemed significant trees. Commissioner Reidel noted that the report had specifically mentioned Boxelder trees and the City does not consider that type of tree to be significant. Mr. Cutting stated that he did not believe any of the trees being saved were Boxelders, but were, Maple, Spruce, and Boxwood trees. Commissioner Riedel stated that there had been mention of retaining walls to help decrease the amount of grading and asked if that was the original or revised plan. Mr. Cutting stated that the idea of a retaining wall was in order to lower the driveways and the first -floor elevation of the homes. He stated that the difficulty with lowering the property is the ability to properly drain it. CITY OF SHOREWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DECEMBER 4, 2018 Page 4 of 5 Director Darling clarified the areas where she had mentioned the possible use of retaining walls was to help with saving additional trees. Commissioner Riedel asked with regard to the tree replacement policy whether the developer was planning to plant replacement trees on site or contribute to the parks. Mr. Cutting stated that he is open to either option. Director Darling stated that in this case, she expects to see the planting to happen back on the lot. Chair Maddy suggested that the developer consider planting more trees than required because of the concerns expressed by the neighbors. Commissioner Riedel asked how the footprint of the proposed dwellings compare with the other dwellings in the PUD. Director Darling stated that she believes they are wider. Mark Kirkeby, Coldwell Banker Wayzata, stated that the size of the twin homes is very similar to the villas. He noted that the villas are a bit shorter and wider than the twin homes. Commissioner Eggenberger showed a satellite photo from Google Maps of the twin homes. Eggenberger moved, Riedel seconded, recommending approval of the Planned Unit Development and Minor Subdivision located at 23825 Lawtonka Drive, subject to conditions listed in the staff report. Motion passed 510. Commissioner Gorham commended both Director Darling and City Engineer Fauske for their thorough job in looking into this matter and putting together the report. Director Darling noted that this will be presented to the Council on January 14, 2019. 4. OTHER BUSINESS - None 5. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR - None 6. REPORTS • Liaison to Council Council Liaison Johnson stated that he was unable to report on the November 26, 2018 meeting because he was traveling for work on that evening. Director Darling gave a brief overview of the Council meeting and work session discussion from November 26, 2018. • Draft Next Meeting Agenda Director Darling stated that she had not received anything for the next meeting yet, but believes there is an antennae application coming in by the end of the week. She stated that she would also like the Planning Commission to consider scheduling a joint Planning Commission /Parks Commission meeting to discuss fire lanes. CITY OF SHOREWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DECEMBER 4, 2018 Page 5 of 5 Chair Maddy stated that a joint meeting makes sense because the fire lanes are both a recreational and zoning issue. Commissioner Davis asked how the deer hunt ended up doing this year. Director Darling stated that she has not heard the results and believes the information will be reported at the December 10, 2018 Council meeting. 7. ADJOURNMENT Eggenberger moved, Riedel seconded, adjourning the Planning Commission Meeting of December 4, 2018, at 7:52 P.M. Motion passed 510. #9A MEETING TYPE City of Shorewood Council Meeting Item Regular Title / Subject: Proposed Excess Fund Balance Purposes Meeting Date: January 28, 2019 Prepared by: Joe Rigdon, Finance Director Reviewed by: Greg Lerud, City Administrator Attachments: N/A Policy Consideration: The City Council adopted a fund balance policy at its January 14, 2019 meeting. Background: The 2019 fund balance policy states the City's goal will be to maintain an end -of -year unassigned fund balance in the General Fund of an amount not less than 60% of the next year's budgeted expenditures and transfers out of the General Fund. The policy further states that if unassigned fund balance in the General Fund at the completion of any fiscal year exceeds 60% of the next year's budgeted expenditures and transfers out of the General Fund, the excess may be used for specific projects, capital acquisitions and improvements, transfers to other funds, or for other purposes determined by the City Council. At December 31, 2018, the unassigned General Fund balance is estimated to be $500,000 in excess of the 60% goal. In that regard, staff are proposing the following uses of the excess fund balance: • Badger Park playground surface. When the council approved the poured -in -place rubber foundation it was recommended that the cost, $120,000, be one of the items completed with the excess fund balance. • Manor Park Pond. The City Council has heard from the Manor neighborhood about the need for remediation of the Manor Park pond. Staff estimates the cost of remediation to be approximately $230,000. The scope of work will not be known until Barr Engineering completes their survey and testing so they can recommend a remediation plan. Fiber to Citv Hall /Shorewood Communitv and Event Center /Public Works. and technology improvements to SCEC. The City Council accepted a proposal to install fiber to the city campus and it was recommended at the time, that the $15,000 cost be funded by excess fund balance. In addition to the fiber, Wi -Fi improvements to be made at the SCEC and finishing up improvements at the facility are estimated at $10,000. • South Playground at Freeman Park. The Parks Commission has identified this playground as needing improvement. The recommended $60,000 will be used to Mission Statement: The City of Shorewood is committed to providing residents quality public services, a healthy environment, a variety of attractive amenities, a sustainable tax base, and sound financial management through effective, efficient, and visionary leadership. refurbish the existing apparatus, install two additional pieces and replace the pea rock with wood chips for fall protection. • City Hall Security system. Staff has discussed improving the security at city hall by upgrading the present lock system and installing a camera system. It is estimated that $25,000 will be sufficient to make these improvements. Summary of proposed capital transfers from the General Fund to other funds: Transfer P Badger Park playground surface Manor Park Pond Fiber to City Hall Fiber to SCEC Technology improvements to SCEC South playground at Freeman Park City Hall Security System Fund Receiving Transfer Amount Park Capital $120,000 Stormwater Management $230,000 Equipment Replacement $7,500 Shorewood Community & Event Center $7,500 Shorewood Community & Event Center $10,000 Park Capital $60,000 Equipment Replacement $25,000 $460,000 Financial or Budget Considerations: If the proposed transfers are approved, the General Fund unassigned fund balance will be reduced, in accordance with the City's fund balance policy. Recommendation / Action Requested: Staff recommends that the City Council approve the capital transfers as requested, effective January 28, 2019. Next Steps and Timeline: If the proposed transfers are approved, staff will adjust cash balances of the affected funds. I M M City of Shorewood Council Meeting Item Title / Subject: Investments 4th Quarter 2018 Report Meeting Date: January 28, 2019 Prepared by: Joe Rigdon, Finance Director Reviewed by: Greg Lerud, City Administrator Attachments: Fourth Quarter 2018 Investments Spreadsheets Policy Consideration: An investment report is provided to the City Council for review on a quarterly basis #10A.1 MEETING TYPE Regular Background: The following information describes the unaudited investment activity of the City's funds as of December 31, 2018. The City's investment policy, modified 3/24/13, indicates that an investment report shall be prepared at least quarterly, including a management summary. General Objectives: The primary objectives, in priority order, of investment activities are safety, liquidity, and yield 1. Safety: Safety of principal is the foremost objective of the investment program. Investments shall be undertaken in a manner that seeks to ensure the preservation of capital in the overall portfolio. The objective is to mitigate credit risk and interest rate risk. Credit risk is the risk of loss due to the failure of the security issuer or backer. Interest rate risk is the risk that the market value of securities in the portfolio will fall due to changes in market interest rates. 2. Liquidity: The investment portfolio shall remain sufficiently liquid to meet all operating requirements that may be reasonably anticipated. This is accomplished by structuring the portfolio so that securities mature concurrent with cash needs to meet anticipated demands. 3. Yield: The investment portfolio shall be designed with the objective of attaining a market rate of return through budgetary and economic cycles, taking into account the investment risk constraints and liquidity needs. Mission Statement: The City of Shorewood is committed to providing residents quality public services, a healthy environment, a variety of attractive amenities, a sustainable tax base, and sound financial management through effective, efficient, and visionary leadership. Authorized and Suitable Investments: Minnesota Statute 118A.04 lists the types of investments that public funds may be invested in. The City's investment policy is narrower than the statute, and includes the following permissible investments: • United States securities: Governmental bonds, notes, bills, mortgages (excluding high -risk mortgage- backed securities), and other securities, which are direct obligations or are guaranteed or insured issues of the United States, its agencies, its instrumentalities, or organizations created by an act of Congress. • State and local securities: Any security which is a general obligation of any state or local government with taxing powers which is rated "A" or better by a national bond rating service. Any security which is a revenue obligation of any state or local government with taxing powers which is rated "AA" or better by a national bond rating service. • Commercial paper: Commercial paper issued by United States corporations or their Canadian subsidiaries that is rated in the highest quality category by at least two nationally recognized rating agencies and matures in 270 days or less. • Time deposits: Time deposits that are fully insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) or by the National Credit Union Administration (NCUA). • Minnesota joint powers investment trust (4M Fund): Investments are restricted to securities described in Minnesota Statutes 118A.04 and 118A.07, subdivision 7. Diversification: The City shall attempt to diversity its investments according to type and maturity. The portfolio may contain both short -term and long -term investments. The City will attempt to match its investment maturities with anticipated cash flow requirements. The City's investment policy includes the following restrictions: No more than 30% of the total investments should extend beyond 5 years. No investment should extend beyond 15 years. No more than 10% of the total investments shall be commercial paper. As of 12/31/18, the City is in compliance with the investment policy's diversification restrictions. Current Investments: At 12/31/18, market value of the City's investments amounted to $9,400,158.76. Brokered certificates of deposit were the largest share of the portfolio, at 44.0 %. An investments summary and an investments detail listing are included on the attachments. Municipal) 33% Govern Agency Se nvestrnents Allocation 12/31/18 4M Fund 12% " -- - -ed Money irket5 696 Brokered rtifi cate s of Deposit 449 The weighted average portfolio maturity in days of the City's investment portfolio has declined during the year, and was calculated at 552 days as of 12/31/18. The decrease resulted due to shorter maturities on reinvestments of 2018 matured securities. 2SDD% 2.4 D D% 2.3 D D% 2.26696 2.16696 2.44496 Weighted Average Portfolio Yield 06/36118 47131/18 48/31118 09130/18 14/31/18 11130118 12131/18 The weighted average yield of the City's investment portfolio has exhibited some upward movement during the year, and was calculated at 2.431% at 12/31/18. 2SOC;: 2.46656 2.3 6656 2.26696 2.16496 2.44496 06/36118 47131/18 48/31118 49130/18 14/31/18 11134118 12131/18 4 From 1/1/18 through 12/31/18, the City received $197,710 in investment interest. The change in fair market value of the portfolio decreased by $45,493 through 12/31/18 as a result of market interest rates increasing during 2018. The City's intent is to hold investments to maturity dates, which will prevent realized principal losses on investments related to market conditions. Net investment income through 12/31/18 amounted to $152,217. Financial or Budget Considerations: This report is intended to provide investments financial information for the City's funds Recommendation / Action Requested: Staff recommends that the City Council accept the quarterly investments report. Next Steps and Timeline: The investments quarterly report for March 2019 will be prepared and distributed in April 2019 Connection to Vision / Mission: The review of periodic reporting of financial information is a component of sound financial management. City of Shorewood Investments Summary 2018 Allocation ($) 4M Fund Brokered Money Markets Brokered Certificates of Deposit Government Agency Securities Municipal Bonds Allocation ( %) 4M Fund Brokered Money Markets Brokered Certificates of Deposit Government Agency Securities Municipal Bonds 12/31/17 01/31/18 02/28/18 03/31/18 04/30/18 05/31/18 06/30/18 07/31/18 08/31/18 09/30/18 10/31/18 11/30/18 12/31/18 216,336.82 216,528.84 216,711.32 216,937.77 217,187.50 220,847.06 318,295.78 1,826,198.02 1,853,882.23 875,334.39 635,806.36 1,148,957.49 1,161,147.99 247,271.77 498,048.58 496,392.74 506,340.31 764,580.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6,311,871.66 6,060,231.10 5,564,344.03 4,823,506.37 4,576,203.50 4,577,929.78 4,576,888.92 4,579,463.18 4,876,911.85 4,878,188.39 4,631,732.93 4,136,577.58 4,139,828.71 1,472,470.50 1,467,567.00 1,467,409.50 1,469,780.00 967,352.00 970,921.50 970,426.00 969,390.00 972,477.50 971,130.00 971,496.00 974,135.00 979,532.50 3,541,571.26 3,518,360.99 3,510,174.56 3,515,222.05 3,498,702.17 3,505,592.68 3,412,746.75 3,403,255.07 3,108,307.68 3,097,450.21 3,094,628.97 3,102,604.24 3,119,649.56 11,789,522.01 11,760,736.51 11,255,032.15 10,531,786.50 10,024,025.92 9,275,291.02 9,278,357.45 10,778,306.27 10,811,579.26 9,822,102.99 9,333,664.26 9,362,274.31 9,400,158.76 1.8% 1.8% 1.9% 2.1% 2.2% 2.4% 3.4% 16.9% 17.1% 8.9% 6.8% 12.3% 12.4% 2.1% 4.2% 4.4% 4.8% 7.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 53.5% 51.5% 49.4% 45.8% 45.7% 49.4% 49.3% 42.5% 45.1% 49.7% 49.6% 44.2% 44.0% 12.5% 12.5% 13.0% 14.0% 9.7% 10.5% 10.5% 9.0% 9.0% 9.9% 10.4% 10.4% 10.4% 30.0% 29.9% 31.2% 33.4% 34.9% 37.8% 36.8% 31.6% 28.7% 31.5% 33.2% 33.1% 33.2% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Weighted Average Portfolio Yield Weighted Average Portfolio Maturity (Days) 2.301% 623 2.348% 600 2.382% 614 2.384% 597 2.393% 582 2.408% 585 2.431% 552 City of Shorewood - Investments Detail 12/31/18 4M Fund Purchases Money Market 4M Fund BNY Mellon National Association CD Brokered CD First VA Cmnty Bk Fairfax CD Brokered CD State Bank of India NY NY CD Brokered CD Brand Bkg Co Lawrenceville GA CD Brokered CD Columbus OH Taxable Municipal Bonds First Sentry Bank Inc CD Brokered CD Bank of India NY CD Brokered CD Comenity Cap Bk Utah CD Brokered CD New York Cmnty Bk Westbury New York CD Brokered CD Bank of China CD Brokered CD Financial Federal Bank CD Brokered CD Wells Fargo Bk N A Sioux Falls SD CD Brokered CD Corporate One Federal Credit Union CD Brokered CD Ally Bank Midvale UT CD Brokered CD Goldman Sachs CD Brokered CD Citadel FCU CD Brokered CD Newbank, NA Brokered CD Eagle Bank VA Brokered CD Synchrony Bank CD Brokered CD Sallie Mae Bank CD Brokered CD American Express Fed Svgs Bk CD Brokered CD Brookfield WI Taxable Municipal Bonds FNMA Cap Zero _Government Agency Third Coast Bank, SSB CD Brokered CD American Express Centurion Bk CD Brokered CD Belding MI Schools Ref Ser B Municipal Bonds Oregon St Pension Municipal Bonds Orrstown Bank CD Brokered CD New Orleans LA Ref Limited Tax 'Municipal Bonds TIAA FSB Jacksonville FL CD Brokered CD Conneaut PA School Dist Municipal Bonds Cincinnati OH Taxable _Municipal Bonds Discover Bank CD Brokered CD Mahtomedi MN ISD Taxable 'Municipal Bonds Pinnacle Bk Nashville TN CD Brokered CD New Hampshire State GO Municipal Bonds FNMA Government Agency Great Midwest Bank CD Brokered CD Citibank NA CD Brokered CD Thief River Falls MN Sch Txbl Ser B Municipal Bonds Par Coupon Purchase Maturity Value % Date Date = transferred from US Bank /Stifel to 4M in 6/18 = transferred from Wells Fargo to 4M in 5/18 1.97 1.45 12/19/2017 5/18/2018 1.45 12/28/2017 5/29/2018 1.40 9/12/2017 6/12/2018 1.50 12/29/2017 7/30/2018 1.60 pre -2014 8/15/2018 1.45 12/29/2017 8/29/2018 1.45 9/14/2017 9/12/2018 1.40 9/15/2017 9/14/2018 1.60 12/22/2017 10/22/2018 2.08 5/18/2018 11/19/2018 2.00 5/30/2018 11/26/2018 1.75 12/22/2017 1/22/2019 2.25 9/12/2018 3/12/2019 1.60 9/14/2017 3/14/2019 1.95 3/19/2014 3/19/2019 2.37 9/12/2018 6/12/2019 2.34 6/13/2018 6/13/2019 2.42 7/31/2018 7/31/2019 2.10 8/29/2014 8/29/2019 2.10 9/3/2014 9/3/2019 1.75 9/12/2017 9/12/2019 1.25 6/2016 10/1/2019 N/A 7/2015 10/9/2019 2.63 8/28/2018 2/28/2020 1.90 9/12/2017 3/12/2020 2.25 1/2016 5/1/2020 4.86 12/1/2015 6/1/2020 2.00 8/28/2015 8/28/2020 3.14 3/1/2016 9/1/2020 1.90 9/18/2017 9/14/2020 2.57 5/1/2016 11/1/2020 2.47 8/2015 12/1/2020 2.00 1/5/2017 1/5/2021 3.40 8/1/2015 2/1/2021 1.95 9/21/2017 3/22/2021 2.70 5/2016 4/1/2021 1.75 5/25/2016 5/25/2021 2.88 8/15/2018 8/16/2021 2.95 8/24/2018 8/24/2021 2.80 2/1/2016 2/1/2023 Market Value 12/31/2017 Purchases Sales Transfers in Transfers out Change in Market Value & Gain /Loss Interest/ Dividends Market Value 12/31/2018 216,336.82 2,842,492.31 (2,016,082.50) 1,605,767.77 (1,500,000.00) - 12,633.59 1,161,147.99 - - (245,000.00) 244,985.79 (1,459.93) 14.21 1,459.93 0.00 - - (245,000.00) 244,978.69 (301.72) 21.31 301.72 0.00 - - (245,000.00) 244,941.69 (2,565.45) 58.31 2,565.45 (0.00) - - (245,000.00) 244,862.56 (926.29) 137.44 926.29 0.00 - - (300,000.00) 299,775.00 (2,394.00) 225.00 2,394.00 - - - (245,000.00) 244,768.97 (1,228.34) 231.03 1,228.34 - - - (245,000.00) 244,651.61 (3,533.03) 348.39 3,533.03 (0.00) - - (245,000.00) 244,616.58 (1,428.40) 383.42 1,428.40 0.00 - - (245,000.00) 244,636.91 (3,264.88) 363.09 3,264.88 (0.00) - 247,300.00 (247,300.00) - (2,609.60) - 2,609.60 - - 247,500.00 (247,500.00) - (2,441.10) - 2,441.10 - - - - 244,551.41 (2,866.16) 376.32 2,866.16 244,927.73 - 247,200.00 - - - - - 247,200.00 - - - 243,974.19 (1,976.11) 641.16 1,976.11 244,615.35 - - - 199,752.80 (1,966.03) 49.60 1,966.03 199,802.40 - 245,600.00 - - - - - 245,600.00 - 244,200.00 - - - - - 244,200.00 - 243,900.00 - - - - - 243,900.00 - - - 244,346.59 (2,551.36) (144.55) 2,551.36 244,202.04 - - - 244,323.07 (2,593.64) (134.02) 2,593.64 244,189.05 - - - 242,939.55 (2,161.37) 621.81 2,161.37 243,561.36 - - - 289,524.80 (1,843.75) 2,171.20 1,843.75 291,696.00 - - - 483,680.00 - 5,909.50 - 489,589.50 - 240,100.00 - - - - - 240,100.00 - - - 241,567.80 (2,346.63) 789.63 2,346.63 242,357.43 - - - 251,741.10 (2,868.75) 466.65 2,868.75 252,207.75 - - (87,692.31) 304,261.08 (5,105.95) (2,681.91) 5,105.95 213,886.86 - - - 241,258.12 (3,275.60) (10.78) 3,275.60 241,247.34 - - - 281,590.40 (4,398.80) 459.20 4,398.80 282,049.60 - - - 240,560.11 (2,346.63) 120.79 2,346.63 240,680.90 - - - 277,460.40 (3,598.00) 1,008.00 3,598.00 278,468.40 - - - 313,002.90 (3,882.38) 532.35 3,882.38 313,535.25 - - - 235,319.04 (2,380.27) (261.12) 2,380.27 235,057.92 - - - 392,064.75 (6,545.00) (1,297.45) 6,545.00 390,767.30 - - - 239,168.02 (3,193.72) (190.61) 3,193.72 238,977.41 - - - 593,536.30 (8,032.50) 2,487.10 8,032.50 596,023.40 - - - 485,537.00 (8,750.00) 4,406.00 8,750.00 489,943.00 - 102,000.00 - - - - - 102,000.00 - 19 8,282.50 - - - (1,072.72) - 197,209.78 - - - 497,810.00 (7,000.00) 3,205.00 7,000.00 501,015.00 216,336.82 4,858,574.81 (4,858,574.81) 10,651,955.00 (1,601,835.39) 19,233.35 114,468.98 9,400,158.76 City of Shorewood - Investments Detail 12/31/18 Par Coupon Purchase Maturity Value % Date Date US Bank/Stifel Money Market FICO Strips 9.8 Co 777=07TIMe FNMA Cap Zero Belding MI Schools Ref Ser B Oregon St Pension New Orleans LA Ref Limited Tax Cincinnati OH Taxable kbhtomedi MN ISDTaxable Brokered MMA Government Agency Municipal Bonds Government Agency Municipal Bonds Municipal Bonds Municipal Bonds Municipal Bonds Municipal Bonds Sales 9.80 1.60 N/A 2.25 4.86 3.14 2.47 3.40 3/2014 pre -2014 7/2015 1/2016 12/1/2015 3/1/2016 8/2015 8/1/2015 4/6/2018 8/15/2018 10/9/2019 5/1/2020 6/1/2020 9/1/2020 12/1/2020 2/1/2021 500,000.00 300,000.00 500,000.00 255,000.00 297,857.15 280,000.00 315,000.00 385,000.00 Wells Fargo 1AB21781 Money Market Bank Financial FSB ILCD Bank Mutual Brown Deer Wis CD Bank of China New York City BRH CD Merchants Bk Ind Carmel CD Metabank Storm Lake Iowa CD TCF Natl Bank CD Bank Hapoalim BM NY CD Southpoint Bank Birmingham ALA CD BNY Mellon National Association CD First VA Cmnty Bk Fairfax CD State Bank of India NY NY CD Brand Bkg Co Lawrenceville GA CD First Sentry Bank Inc CD Bank of India NY CD Comenity Cap Bk Utah CD New York Cmnty Bk Westbury New York CD Wells Fargo Bk N A Sioux Falls SD CD Ally Bank Midvale UT CD Goldman Sachs CD Synchrony Bank CD Sallie Mae Bank CD American Express Fed Svgs Bk CD Brookfield WI Taxable American Express Centurion Bk CD Orrstown Bank CD TIAA FSB Jacksonville FL CD Conneaut PA School Dist Discover Bank CD Pinnacle Bk Nashville TN CD New Hampshire State GO FNMA Thief River Falls MN Sch Txbl Ser B Total Investments Brokered MMA Brokered CD Brokered CD Brokered CD Brokered CD Brokered CD Brokered CD Brokered CD Brokered CD Brokered CD Brokered CD Brokered CD Brokered CD Brokered CD Brokered CD Brokered CD Brokered CD Brokered CD Brokered CD Brokered CD Brokered CD Brokered CD Brokered CD Municipal Bonds Brokered CD Brokered CD Brokered CD Municipal Bonds Brokered CD Brokered CD Municipal Bonds Government Agency Municipal Bonds Net Interest Earnings (Interest and realized gains /losses on securities) = transferred from Wells Fargo to 4M in 5/18 1.05 9/13/2017 1/16/2018 1.20 12/20/2017 1/19/2018 1.30 12/20/2017 2/20/2018 1.30 12/28/2017 2/28/2018 1.40 1/2/2018 3/2/2018 1.20 9/13/2017 3/13/2018 1.25 9/15/2017 3/15/2018 1.25 9/18/2017 4/18/2018 1.45 12/19/2017 5/18/2018 1.45 12/28/2017 5/29/2018 1.40 9/12/2017 6/12/2018 1.50 12/29/2017 7/30/2018 1.45 12/29/2017 8/29/2018 1.45 9/14/2017 9/12/2018 1.40 9/15/2017 9/14/2018 1.60 12/22/2017 10/22/2018 1.75 12/22/2017 1/22/2019 1.60 9/14/2017 3/14/2019 1.95 3/19/2014 3/19/2019 2.10 8/29/2014 8/29/2019 2.10 9/3/2014 9/3/2019 1.75 9/12/2017 9/12/2019 1.25 6/2016 10/1/2019 1.90 9/12/2017 3/12/2020 2.00 8/28/2015 8/28/2020 1.90 9/18/2017 9/14/2020 2.57 5/1/2016 11/1/2020 2.00 1/5/2017 1/5/2021 1.95 9/21/2017 3/22/2021 2.70 5/2016 4/1/2021 1.75 5/25/2016 5/25/2021 2.80 2/1/2016 2/1/2023 Market Value 12/31/2017 Purchases Sales Transfers in Transfers out Change in Market Value & Gain /Loss Interest/ Dividends Market Value 12/31/2018 - 500,000.00 - 27,325.37 (527,325.49) - 0.12 0.00 497,875.00 - (500,000.00) - - 2,125.00 - - 299,442.00 - - - (302,169.00) 333.00 2,394.00 - 481,550.00 - - - (483,680.00) 2,130.00 - - 253,870.35 - - - (254,609.85) (2,129.25) 2,868.75 - 308,955.31 - - - (311,497.52) (4,694.23) 7,236.44 0.00 285,415.20 - - - (285,989.20) (3,824.80) 4,398.80 0.00 316,786.05 - - - (316,885.28) (3,783.15) 3,882.38 399,248.85 - - - (398,609.75) (7,184.10) 6,545.00 - 2,843,142.76 500,000.00 1 (500,000.00)1 27,325.37 1 (2,880,766.09) (17,027.53)1 27,325.49 1 0.00 247,271.77 1,960,000.00 (245,000.00) 54,150.03 (2,018,187.48) - 1,765.68 0.00 244,976.48 - (245,000.00) - (239.63) 23.52 239.63 0.00 244,993.88 - (245,000.00) - (241.64) 6.12 241.64 0.00 245,008.82 - (245,000.00) - (541.01) (8.82) 541.01 - 245,004.66 - (245,000.00) - (541.01) (4.66) 541.01 (0.00) - 245,000.00 (245,000.00) - (554.44) 0.00 554.44 0.00 244,930.67 - (245,000.00) - (1,457.92) 69.33 1,457.92 (0.00) 244,951.00 - (245,000.00) - (1,518.66) 49.00 1,518.66 (0.00) 244,874.81 - (245,000.00) - (1,015.23) 125.19 1,015.23 (0.00) 244,987.75 - - - (244,985.79) (1.96) - - 244,970.60 - - - (246,156.37) 8.09 1,177.68 0.00 244,881.91 - - - (244,941.69) 59.78 - - 245,000.00 - - - (246,080.84) (137.44) 1,218.28 - 245,000.00 - - - (245,987.25) (231.03) 1,218.28 - 244,763.09 - - - (244,651.61) (111.48) - - 244,684.20 - - - (245,753.66) (67.62) 1,137.08 0.00 244,936.06 - - - (244,636.91) (299.15) - - 244,988.98 - - - (245,972.73) (437.57) 1,421.32 (0.00) 244,435.28 - - - (245,918.08) (461.09) 1,943.89 (0.00) 200,366.80 - - - (201,686.77) (614.00) 1,933.97 - 245,717.36 - - - (246,940.23) (1,370.77) 2,593.64 (0.00) 245,704.87 - - - (246,874.43) (1,381.80)1 2,551.36 0.00 243,827.92 - - - (245,065.68) (888.37) 2,126.13 (0.00) 290,763.80 - - - (291,368.55) (1,239.00) 1,843.75 - 243,436.41 - - - (243,876.17) (1,868.61) 2,308.37 0.00 244,192.97 - - - (242,882.49) (2,934.85) 1,624.37 0.00 243,482.47 - - - (242,868.48) (2,922.36) 2,308.37 0.00 281,719.20 - - - (281,058.40) (4,258.80) 3,598.00 - 238,697.52 - - - (237,738.77) (3,378.48) 2,419.73 (0.00) 243,057.15 - - - (240,751.79) (3,889.13) 1,583.77 0.00 601,485.50 - - - (601,568.80) (7,949.20) 8,032.50 - 493,045.50 - - - (485,537.00) (7,508.50) - - 503,885.00 - - - (504,810.00) (6,075.00) 7,000.00 - 8,730,042.43 2,205,000.00 (2,205,000.00) 54,150.03 (8,792,409.51) (47,698.66) 55,915.71 0.00 11,789,522.01 7,563,574.81 (7,563,574.81) 10,733,430.40 (13,275,010.99) (45,492.84) 197,710.18 9,400,158.76 152,217.34 152,217.34 OLans" ON , City of Shorewood Council Meeting Item Title /Subject: Meeting Date: Prepared by: Reviewed by: Attachments: SeeClickFix 2018 Review Monday, January 28, 2019 Julie Moore, Communications /Recycling Coordinator Greg Lerud, City Administrator SeeClickFix report 10A.2 MEETING TYPE REGULAR SeeClickFix had an active year in 2018, with over 185 resident reports. This number is over double the number of reports that the city received in 2017. City staff had been adding complaints that were called or walked in to the SeeClickFix system in prior years, but in 2018 this did not occur as frequently, so the system use was primarily from residents using the system online. In 2017, private contact information was requested to be included with the complaint. According to the Brett Baumann in the public works department, this helped the job of public works considerably as he was able to clear up any confusion on locations or issues with a simple phone call. The number one issue reported in 2018 was potholes. In 2019 the city is working on a plan to better respond to potholes so that the front desk and the public are better able to follow repairs. The same plan is being developed for tree issues. These issues both often have follow -up that takes place later so the issue should not be closed, but the result is long "days to close" on the report. The overall response to SeeClickFix has been positive by both residents and staff, and the increased usage over the past year has indicated that residents are beginning to understand the value of the online reporting system. Staff believes that continued use of SeeClickFix is advisable until the Website system offers a reporting system that is equal to, or exceeds the usefulness of SeeClickFix. Connection to Vision /Mission: Consistency in providing residents quality public services, a healthy environment, a variety of attractive amenities, a sustainable tax base, and sound financial management through effective, efficient, and visionary leadership. Mission Statement. The City of Shorewood is committed to providing residents quality public services, a healthy environment, a variety of attractive amenities, a sustainable tax base, and sound financial management through effective, efficient, and visionary leadership. Page 1 EMANShorewood, ��ww Vik Awww. Between Jan 01, 2018 and Dec 31, 2018 186 requests were opened 120 requests were acknowledged 199 requests were closed The average time to acknowledge was 3.0 days. The average time to close was 57.0 days. REQUEST CATEGORY OPENED Pothole 42 Other 26 Private Property Issue 21 Tree Issue 19 Road Conditions 17 Snow Plow Damage 18 Drainage /Flooding Issue 14 Traffic or Street Sign Issue 7 City Water 7 Street Light Issue 6 Trail /Sidewalk Issue 4 Vandalism /Graffiti 1 Abandoned Vehicle 1 Illegal Dumping 1 Compliment Service or Staff 1 Missed Trash or Recycling Pickup 1 Dead Animal 0 Traffic Signal Issue 0 GEOGRAPHY OPENED Shorewood, MN 186 ACKNOWLEDGED 22 14 12 6 6 4 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 ACKNOWLEDGED 120 Requests by Source CLOSED 46 28 20 17 22 18 15 9 7 4 3 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 CLOSED ■ widgets • 107 ■web •45 ■ phone • 26 ■ mobile web • 4 ■ android - 2 ■ city iniliated • 1 ■ facebook - 0 DAYS TO ACK 1.9 2.5 3.5 2.7 2.3 0.1 9.6 0.5 0.2 3.6 2.4 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 DAYS TO ACK. DAYS TO CLOSE 107.8 54.7 42.4 88.4 4.4 61.6 36.0 12.9 16.7 10.1 90.2 214.4 210.3 2.0 0.7 227.8 210.0 DAYS TO CLOSE 199 3.0 57.0 Jan 01, 2018 to Dec 31, 2018 1 of 1