The URL can be used to link to this page

Shorewood Wetland Delineation ReportLim CITY OF SHOREWOOD LEVEL 2 WETLAND DELINEATION REPORT GLEN RD, MANITOU LN, AMLEE RD STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS SHOREWOOD, MN JULY 15, 2019 Prepared for: City of Shorewood 5755 Country Club Rd Excelsior, MN 55331 WSB PROJECT NO. R- 012786 -000 wsb LEVEL 2 WETLAND DELINEATION REPORT GLEN RD, MANITOU LN, AMLEE RD STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS For: THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD July 15, 2019 Prepared by: wsb Wetland Delineation Report Title Page Glen Rd, Manitou Ln, Amlee Rd WSB Project No. R- 012786 -000 CERTIFICATION The report was prepared by: Laura Wehr, WDC No. 1316 Date: July 15, 2019 Title: Environmental Scientist I hereby certify that this report was reviewed by me and that I am a Certified Wetland Delineator in the State of Minnesota. Franta, VgDC No.1317 Date: July 15, 2019 Title: Environmental Scientist Wetland Delineation Report Certification Page Glen Rd, Manitou Ln, Amlee Rd WSB Project No. R- 012786 -000 TABLE OF CONTENTS TITLE PAGE CERTIFICATION TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction ............................. ............................... A. Project Location ......... ............................... B. Project Purpose .......... ............................... C. Project Scope ............. ............................... D. Summary of Findings . ............................... II. Delineation Procedure ............. ............................... A. Off -Site Determination: Base Map Review B. On -Site Determination ............................... III. Results and Wetland Information ........................... A. Wetland 1 ................... ............................... B. Wetland 2 ................... ............................... C. Wetland 3 ................... ............................... D. Wetland 4 ................... ............................... E. Additional Water Resources ..................... IV. Summary and Closing Statements ........................ V. References .............................. ............................... Appendix A: Figure 1 — Project Location Figure 2 — Topography Figure 3 — DNR Public Waters Inventory Figure 4 — National Wetlands Inventory Figure 5 — Hennepin County Soil Survey Appendix B: Figures 6a -6b — Wetland Boundary Wetland Determination Data Forms Appendix C: Wetland Photos Appendix D: Antecedent Precipitation Data 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 3 4 4 4 5 5 6 7 8 Wetland Delineation Report Table of Contents Glen Rd, Manitou Ln, Amlee Rd WSB Project No. R- 012786 -000 SECTION I I. Introduction A. Project Location The project is located along Glen Road, Manitou Lane, Amlee Road, and the Lake Minnetonka LRT Regional Trail, west of Manitou Road in the City of Shorewood, Hennepin County, Minnesota. The project area consists of approximately 11.9 acres in Section 33 of Township 117 and Range 23, Major Watershed #20, BSA #7 (Figure 1, Appendix A). B. Project Purpose The City of Shorewood is proposing to reconstruct Glen Road, Manitou Lane, and Amlee Road within the project area and provide additional stormwater management for the project area. This report is intended to address all jurisdictional WCA, Public Water, or Section 404 wetlands and /or waters for final design and permitting of this project. This project was authorized by the City of Shorewood. C. Project Scope The scope of this project was to delineate the wetlands within the outlined project area, excluding created stormwater ponds. D. Summary of Findings A Level 2 wetland delineation was performed on the site. A total of four wetlands were identified and delineated in the preparation of this report, as summarized in Table 1. For a visual representation of the wetland locations and sizes, please see Figures 6a and 6b, Appendix B. All potential wetland areas (mapped hydric soils, NWI signatures, and low depressional areas) were reviewed on -site and either delineated or determined to be upland. Table 1: Summary of Delineated Wetlands, Glen Rd, Manitou Ln, Amlee Rd, Hennepin County, Minnesota Wetland Delineation No. Eggers Circular 39 NWI* DNR County Soil Wetland ID Method Transects and Reed (Cowardin) PWI ** Survey (Hydric/ Size (acres) Non - Hydric) * ** 1 Level 2 1 Shallow Type 3 Yes NA L37B, L36A 0.11 Marsh (PEM1C) 2 Level 2 1 Shallow Type 3 Yes NA L37B, U2A 1.57 Marsh (PEM1 F) 3 Level 2 1 Shallow Type 3 Yes NA L22C2, L24A 0.11 Marsh (PEM1C) 4 Level 2 1 Seasonally Type 1 No NA L9A 0.02 Flooded (PFOA) Basin 'Yes" indicates wetland is mapped in the NWI and 'No" indicates the wetland is not mapped in the NWI. ** "NA" indicates the wetland is not mapped in the PWI. Numbers listed are the DNR ID, indicating the wetland is mapped in the PWI. ***Bolded numbers indicate hydric soils. Wetland Delineation Report Glen Rd, Manitou Ln, Amlee Rd WSB Project No. R- 012786 -000 Page 1 SECTION II II. Delineation Procedure A. Off -Site Determination: Base Map Review Topography: The landform is generally sloping to the north with some local depressions. The wetlands were either located in local depressions or in the topographically lower portion of the project area. Water generally flows south to north towards Lake Minnetonka (Figure 2, Appendix A). The DNR Public Waters and Wetlands Map, Hennepin County, MN (Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, 1983) shows no public waters within the project area (Figure 3, Appendix A). The National Wetlands Inventory Map (Minnesota Department of Natural Resources) identified several wetlands as part of the National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) (Figure 4, Appendix A). The NWI identifies the following wetland types: PEM1F, PEM1C, and PUBGx. The Soil Survey of Hennepin County, Minnesota ( https:/ /websoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov /App /HomePage.htm) identified the following soils (Table 2) within the project area (Figure 5, Appendix A): Table 2: Soil Survey of Hennepin County Map Soil Unit Name Percent Rating Symbol Hydric L9A Minnetonka silty clay loam, 0 to 2 100 All Hydric percent slopes Lester loam, 6 to 10 percent Predominantly L22C2 slopes, moderately eroded 2 non - hydric Cordova loam, 0 to 2 percent Predominantly L23A slopes 95 hydric L24A Glencoe clay loam, 0 to 1 percent 100 All hydric slopes Le Sueur loam, 1 to 3 percent Predominantly L25A slopes 15 non - hydric Hamel, overwash -Hamel complex, L36A 0 to 3 percent slopes 45 Partially hydric Angus loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes Predominantly L37B 5 non - hydric U2A Udorthents, wet substratum, 0 to 2 0 Not hydric percent slopes Urban land - Udorthents (cut and fill U613 land) complex, 0 to 6 percent 0 Not hydric slopes Antecedent Climate Conditions: Historic climate data and WETS data were obtained from the Minnesota Climatology Working Group preceding the June 5, 2019 site visit, which fell within the wetter than normal precipitation range. Records of the precipitation can be found in Appendix D. Wetland Delineation Report Glen Rd, Manitou Ln, Amlee Rd WSB Project No. R- 012786 -000 Page 2 SECTION II B. On -Site Determination A Level 2 field investigation was conducted by Laura Wehr (WDC No. 1316) and Mary Boltri of WSB on June 5, 2019, within the entire project area. No deviation or omissions were undertaken as part of this investigation. The project area was delineated using the routine methodology described in the Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual (US Army Corps of Engineers 1987), with additional guidance provided by the Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Midwest Region (Version 2.0). Wetlands were classified according to the methodologies set forth in Wetlands of the United States (Circular 39), USFWS Shaw and Fredine 1971; Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States, Cowardin 1979; and Wetland Plants and Plant Communities of Minnesota and Wisconsin, 2nd ed., Eggers and Reed 1997. The wetland types in this report are classified by the Circular 39, Cowardin, and Eggers and Reed Classifications. Soil types were researched prior to the on -site investigation with the assistance of the Soil Survey of Hennepin County from the National Resources Conservation Service. All soil test pits were excavated to a minimum depth of 24 inches unless otherwise noted. Soil colors were described on -site per the Munsell Soil Color Charts (2009 Revised Edition) from the test pits in and adjacent to the wetlands. Hydric soils were identified using the current technical criteria for hydric soils developed by the NRCS in 2017 (Version 8.1). The presence of water was observed after time was allowed for movement of water through the substrate. This time varied depending upon soil characteristics. The quadrant sampling method was employed for all sample points unless otherwise noted. Vegetation was measured as actual areal cover and may exceed 100 percent of total area due to overlap. Grasses and herbaceous vegetative cover were measured within a circular plot of a 5- foot- radius, all woody shrubs and saplings were measured within a circular plot with a 15 -foot- radius, and trees and woody vines were measured in a 30- foot - radius circular plot. Regional plant identification resources were utilized in the identification of plant species, with indicator status taken from the 2016 National Wetland Plant List (US Army Corps of Engineers 2016). Plant species dominance was estimated based on the absolute percent coverage for herbaceous, shrub - sapling, and tree strata if present. In addition to the use of indicators of hydrology, hydric soils, and the presence of hydrophytic vegetation, other evidence such as topographic breaks and watershed characteristics were used to determine the wetland boundary. Midwest Regional Supplement Routine Wetland Delineation data forms were used to record vegetation, hydrology, and soil characteristics at sample points in and adjacent to the wetlands (Appendix B). Sampling transects were taken along the wetland - upland boundary of the wetland. Transects and delineated wetland boundaries were field surveyed using a sub -meter accuracy hand held GPS unit. Approximate sampling points and delineated wetland edges are shown on Figures 6a and 6b, Appendix B. Pictures of each wetland can be found in Appendix C. Wetland Delineation Report Glen Rd, Manitou Ln, Amlee Rd WSB Project No. R- 012786 -000 Page 3 SECTION III III. Results and Wetland Information The wetland delineation data forms (Appendix B) and photos (Appendix C) are attached. A summary of the delineation is below. A. Wetland 1 Circular 39: Type 3 Cowardin: PEM1C Eggers and Reed Field Classification: Shallow Marsh Soil mapping unit: L37B, L36A No. Transects: 1 No. Additional Sample Points Wetland Size (within Project Area): 0.11 acres Wetland 1 is positioned west of Glen Road and north of Harding Lane. The wetland extends outside of the project boundary and is generally surrounded by woods and lawns. The wetland is characterized as a Type 3 Shallow Marsh. The wetland boundary is outlined in Figure 6a, Appendix B. Dominant vegetation in the wetland consisted of black willow (Salix nigra), American elm (Ulmus americans), and white mulberry (Morus alba) in the tree stratum; black willow (Salix nigra) in the sapling /shrub stratum; and reed canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea) in the herb stratum. Hydric soil indicators consisted of Depleted Matrix (F3) and Redox Depression (F8). Hydrology indicators included High Water Table (A2), Saturation (A3), Geomorphic Position (D2), and FAC - Neutral Test (D5). Dominant vegetation in the upland consisted of black ash (Fraxinus nigra) and boxelder maple (Acer negundo) in the tree stratum; and reed canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea) and Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis) in the herb stratum. Hydric soil indicators consisted of Depleted Matrix (F3). Hydrology indicators included FAC- Neutral Test (D5). The wetland boundary was placed along a topographic slope, transitioning from a lack of hydrology indicators to a presence of hydrology indicators. B. Wetland 2 Circular 39: Type 3 Cowardin: PEM1 F Eggers and Reed Field Classification: Shallow Marsh Soil mapping unit: U2A, L37B No. Transects: 1 No. Additional Sample Points Wetland Size (within Project Area): 1.57 acres Wetland 2 is positioned north of Amlee Road and is intersected by the Lake Minnetonka LRT Regional Trail. Parts of the wetland extend outside of the project boundary. Houses and lawns are located south of the wetland, and Manitou Park is located to the north. The wetland is characterized as Type 3 Shallow Marsh. The wetland boundary is outlined in Figure 6b, Appendix B. Dominant vegetation in the wetland consisted of green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica), silver maple (Acer saccharinum), and eastern cottonwood (Populus deltoides) in the tree stratum; and fowl bluegrass (Poa palustris), ostrich fern (Matteuccia struthiopteris), and garlic mustard (Alliaria petiolate) in the herb stratum. Hydric soil indicators consisted of Black Histic (A3). Hydrology indicators included High Water Table (A2), Saturation (A3), and FAC - Neutral Test (D5). Wetland Delineation Report Glen Rd, Manitou Ln, Amlee Rd WSB Project No. R- 012786 -000 Page 4 SECTION III Dominant vegetation in the upland consisted of northern catalpa (Catalpa speciosa) in the tree stratum; and southern blueflag (Iris virginica) and ostrich fern (Matteuccia struthiopteris) in the herb stratum. Hydric soil indicators consisted of Black Histic (A3) and Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1). Hydrology indicators included FAC- Neutral Test (D5). The wetland boundary was placed along a slight topographic break, transitioning from a lack of hydrology indicators to a presence of hydrology indicators. C. Wetland 3 Circular 39: Type 3 Cowardin: PEM1C Eggers and Reed Field Classification: Shallow Marsh Soil mapping unit: L22C2, L24A No. Transects: 1 No. Additional Sample Points Wetland Size (within Project Area): 0.11 acres Wetland 3 is positioned southwest of the intersection of Glen Road and Manitou Road. The wetland extends outside of the project boundary and is generally surrounded by woods and lawns. The wetland is characterized as Type 3 Shallow Marsh. The wetland boundary is outlined in Figure 6b, Appendix B. Dominant vegetation in the wetland consisted of eastern cottonwood (Populus deltoides) and green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica) in the tree stratum; and reed canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea) in the herb stratum. Hydric soil indicators consisted of Histic Epipedon (A2) and 2 cm Muck (Al 0). Hydrology indicators included High Water Table (A2), Saturation (A3), and FAC - Neutral Test (D5). Dominant vegetation in the upland consisted of green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica) in the tree stratum; and reed canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea), trillium (Trillium flexipes), and northern bedstraw (Galium boreale) in the herb stratum. There were no hydric soil indicators present at this sample point. Hydrology indicators included FAC - Neutral Test (D5). The wetland boundary was placed following a topographic change, transitioning from a lack of hydrology indicators to a presence of hydrology indicators. D. Wetland 4 Circular 39: Type 1 Cowardin: PFOA Eggers and Reed Field Classification: Seasonally Flooded Basin Soil mapping unit: L9A No. Transects: 1 No. Additional Sample Points: 0 Wetland Size (within Project Area): 0.02 acres Wetland 4 is positioned east of Wedgewood Drive, near the northwest corner of the project area. The wetland is located to the west of Manitou Park and is generally surrounded by forest. The wetland is characterized as a Type 1 Seasonally Flooded Basin. The wetland boundary is outlined in Figure 6a, Appendix B. Dominant vegetation in the wetland consisted of American elm (Ulmus americans) in the tree stratum. Hydric soil indicators consisted of 2 cm Muck (A10) and Depleted Matrix (F3). Hydrology indicators included Surface Water (Al), High Water Table (A2), Saturation (A3), Geomorphic Position (D2) and FAC - Neutral Test (D5). Wetland Delineation Report Glen Rd, Manitou Ln, Amlee Rd WSB Project No. R- 012786 -000 Page 5 SECTION III Dominant vegetation in the upland consisted of American elm (Ulmus americans) in the tree stratum; and common buckthorn (Rhamnus cathartica) in the sapling /shrub stratum. There were no hydric soil indicators present at this sample point. Hydrology indicators included Saturation (A3) and FAC- Neutral Test (D5). The wetland boundary was placed along a transition of non - hydric soils with more abundant vegetation, to hydric soils with more sparse vegetation. E. Additional Water Resources In addition to the wetlands identified within this report, the project area also contained a storm water pond located northwest of the intersection of Glen Road and Manitou Rd. This is shown in Figure 6b as photo point 5. Wetland Delineation Report Glen Rd, Manitou Ln, Amlee Rd WSB Project No. R- 012786 -000 Page 6 SECTION IV IV. Summary and Closing Statements Four wetlands were delineated within the project area using the Level 2 method, and one storm water pond was noted. No additional areas were investigated. The wetland delineation report was completed by Mary Boltri and Laura Wehr of WSB. This delineation report is being submitted as a request for approval of Wetland Type and Boundary of the wetland described herein. The application for Boundary and Type Approval is included along with this report. Wetland Delineation Report Glen Rd, Manitou Ln, Amlee Rd WSB Project No. R- 012786 -000 Page 7 SECTION V V. References The following sources of information were reviewed to assist in performing the wetland delineation. Literature Sources Board of Water and Soil Resources. 2009. Wetland Conservation Act Rules, Chapter 8420. Print Communication Division, St. Paul. Cowardin L.M. USFWS. 1979. Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States. U.S. Government Printing Office, Carver, D.C. 131 pp. Eggers, S.D. and D.M. Reed. 2014. Wetland Plants and Plant Communities of Minnesota & Wisconsin, Second Edition. United States Army Corps of Engineers, St. Paul District. 263 pp. Fredine, C.G. and S.P. Shaw. 1956. Wetlands of the United States (Circular 39). United States Government Printing Office, Carver, D.C. Kollmorgen Instruments Corp. 2009 Revised Edition. Munsell Soil Color Charts. National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils. 1991. Hydric Soils of the United States. U.S.D.A. Soil Conservation Service. Carver, D.C. Misc. Publication 1491. Revised December 15, 1995. United States Army Corps of Engineers. Minnesota 2016 State Wetland Plant List- National Wetland Plant List. 2016 Ratings. Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory (CRREL). United States Army Corps of Engineers. August 2010. Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Midwest Region (Version 2.0), ed. J. S. Wakeley, R. W. Lichvar, and C. V. Nobel. ERDC /EL TR- 10 -16. Vicksburg, MS: U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center. United States Army Corps of Engineers- St. Paul District and Minnesota Board of Water & Soil Resources. March 4, 2015. Guidance for Submittal of Delineation Reports to the St. Paul District Army Corps of Engineers and Wetland Conservation Act Local Governmental Units in Minnesota, Version 2.0. United States Army Corps of Engineers. 1987 2014. Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual. Technical Report Y -87 -1. Version 2.0 Waterways Experiment Station. Soil Survey Staff, Natural Resources Conservation Service, United States Department of Agriculture. Webs Soil Survey, Minnesota. Available online at http: / /websoilsurvey.nres.usda.gov /. Accessed 7/3/2019. Wetland Delineation Report Glen Rd, Manitou Ln, Amlee Rd WSB Project No. R- 012786 -000 Page 8 APPENDIX APPENDIX A Figure 1: Project Location Figure 2: Topography Figure 3: DNR Public Waters Inventory Figure 4: National Wetlands Inventory Figure 5: Hennepin County Soil Survey Wetland Delineation Report Glen Rd, Manitou Ln, Amlee Rd WSB Project No. R- 012786 -000 Appendix Document Path: K:5012786- 0001GIS\Ma sSWetlands\Fi 1 Location Date Saved: 7/15/2019 7 52 PM i � �IV:1, SiDn'$i1 p� a If �l✓ O m + Q Qi U �� . m Y m a3 k 5� i, i� �L co N a C7 � J W vz� i C7 w m a 0S S` crt C, N fie, 1p `" a m O N O ryCa W \v S j�� Pa aJ/,b �!q'p /) AA `/% J <G_ 11 j N O CD N y` �� CD m } o I � z oint Rd I� n►e�� m — Minnet � I�� v L E a O 0 I co O d x m Y � �p.r- c� V O x � r O C /Sad— H o A ° a) °�. S,eamansL f 00 18p a r � V p 'a a) fC NEureka Rd v i ` P8 e�laan .� O — -a L7 U �1 ns LJ .o W a ce O E Lr --11 r T3 v �� LL o fj 1 w 3 o m o W _C3 co Q CL �ti14f °d s point Aa�,MOH N °Nall ds o _3 �� (D —° m ^ I . x S -C C) ct a ro ro a` Document Path: K.- \012786 - 000 \GIS\Ma s \\MetlandsTi 2 Toro Date Saved. 7/15/2019 2.52 PM j \ I 4111110 CZ 4� LL 0 LL F 4—J i CD CID �- 1,!, _ f" Ili,, 1 , _ __,•�_ _,, _ I ,� - r ` °J 11 I\ // � ~� 111 / "/ \`1 _ I, r• \ 11'1 `11, \J (.c -�� \ \ � �� 'II l_ � -- =— o ,� ��,J f -�_�' (_,liiiii ilia_ !•� �''�� '� \ � -_ �i /' i • � i/;:J i `�'\� Ilk, II _�-�\'\ �� J�il l �' l 1 `',� •� /' -�} '`,I 1'i /� 1111 '.\,\1,\, i --.iii ' I + 4 i i '�� f t -��, r' r� / '_-_ _�� "\}_ -J� r' • \'��.'� 1 1 \;�• \ 1 * i � 1 /' ! f 1 \' r /•ti� III /J� i � -�� i-\ 1 1\ \;\,� �. N� �11r � � 1 \ ,\ -'-` _ !ii �IY /1 !II i •�/ / //I �_ / / ;! 1,11 \, / /,iii; -- C /,� �- r'1 • 1j , � , `� '\ i ,I / l 5 { I � •1 '�_� / i i i ii !iii �. ��. {•\ � i � a, � � 1, .,-- � '`_, - -� J � i � � {, r1 i ,1, ,1 •\ ,.0 � J I' ! I �, /j" ,�ll /ice ; %. /' ` 1 /, /f(fi f '\ �1 � •� Z O o � � 1 [ 1 r o -a h i i I / /' 1 •� \ \ ti I j 1 i i `` � � � o �' r` - �''/�7 ,rrir' �� 1 � 11 i �\ j ` ,1 �� -�.1 '� 1 •\ .. '1'1 j 111! i i � i � � \ � / /• �,} � LL y'1'1'y 1 \ 1,!I! \' �' 1 f f r � � > \� f•� � \ \ i'\I 11111' 1 f ��/ / `~ 1 f 1 '\ � �_� "\ \'11 141 ' 1• ,' �'- �. i \f;\ 1 \�. O\k L6 0 -aL - -!F - +.j 0 0 0 w 0 ti N co co ■ 5 p f�6 f�6 t6 IL VO u v Ul o{ o� of rn� o� N 0 0 N O O N n O O 11 O cn O N J J -0 - C va a O (D +� - D� 13� c O Q7 O i * a D z° r O � J Z 0 - o _ O I I V _ Z C ❑ E O - z ■-� L -1000 a o{ o� of rn� o� N 0 0 N O O N n O O 11 O cn O N J Q Lf. 0 03 uo x C C i y C � J Z 0 - o O T3 v Z ❑ E L Q Lf. 0 03 uo x Document Path: K5017788- 0001GISWia sSWetlandsl j r m a s p an-, - �, A x • L Ul7 W ' v m a - t7 w a T y a � a ti! ;! f • MpL u. o 03 L O r_ N o r J •Qj Qj _ 4- v O cn +� C7 v z u. o 03 t 'k vv�� .-. wN��I��w - •� ..... • • OWNR♦♦♦♦0♦ ♦♦♦ ♦♦ V ♦♦ mm OL VVVy 4 � c ru ♦ ♦.d.�� •• . ti�•�d�•��♦ zc Nil MI. 6 ROOM NOWN ♦ ♦ • i • i •♦•dii • i � i • i ii �i • i � ► • n f LLc •i i - APPENDIX APPENDIX B Figures 6a and 6b: Wetland Delineation Wetland Determination Data Forms Wetland Delineation Report Glen Rd, Manitou Ln, Amlee Rd WSB Project No. R- 012786 -000 Appendix o ew +me »z mI_.«_ d T ,wlaTid «,_a 7/15/2019 7 52 e M f � . j G g 0 e _ � < U) 2 <0 ± \ C14 / ± \ / - \ ED ? � 4 f o � ) # � � � . � � 0 # � \ ƒ2 � \22 _ X20 \ \ � � ¥ _ 7 - • °f) § )c a ` � 1 a' 0 0 3 M/c o• M M d " �• �E a � n �� L I.- Ada �. bL . --I _ .1.6 #46,0 N C R N ..I I .9 an. . N IN , N C a �r ` Q I .o O E n 0 0 E QQO o V 0 O m V � a a� a� o LL 4, N hN O O 1� V C o■'-' z� C 0 o O - m W J •� � Z = O 0 - Oro � � O i Q LL Q ® wo 03 HW . �x WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region Project/Site Glen et. Al City /County: Shorewood /Hennepin Sampling Date: 6/5/2019 Applicant/Owner: Shorewood State: MN Sampling Point: 1 -WET Investigator(s): Laura Wehr and Mary Boltri Section, Township, Range: 33, 117,23 Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): None Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope ( %): 3 -5 Lat: 93.6001394 °W Long: 44.9035733 °N Datum: NAD 83 Soil Map Unit NameL36A VWI Classification: PEM1C Are climatic /hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year? N (If no, explain in remarks) Are vegetation soil or hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "normal circumstances" Are vegetation soil or hydrology naturally problematic? present? Yes SUMMARY OF FINDINGS (If needed, explain anv answers in remarks.) Hydrophytic vegetation present? Y Absolute Hydric soil present? Y Is the sampled area within a wetland? Y Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Y f yes, optional wetland site ID: Wetland 1 Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Prior Period has been wetter than normal VEGETATION -- Use scientific names of plants. US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region Absolute Dominan Indicator Dominance Test Worksheet Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft ) % Cover t Species Staus Number of Dominant Species 1 Salix nigra 10 Y OBL that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5 (A) 2 Ulmus americans 10 Y FACW Total Number of Dominant 3 Morus alba 10 Y FAC Species Across all Strata: 5 (B) 4 Percent of Dominant Species 5 that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.00% (A/B) 30 =Total Cover Sapling /Shrub stratum (Plot size: 15 ft ) Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Salix nigra 10 Y OBL Total % Cover of: 2 OBL species 25 x 1 = 25 3 FACW species 75 x 2 = 150 4 FAC species 10 x 3 = 30 5 FACU species 0 x 4= 0 10 =Total Cover UPL species 0 x 5 = 0 Herb stratum (Plot size: 5 ft ) Column totals 110 (A) 205 (B) 1 Phalaris arundinacea 60 Y FACW Prevalence Index = B/A = 1.86 2 Impatiens capensis 5 N FACW 3 Typha angustifolia 5 N OBL Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4 Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 5 _ X Dominance test is >50% 6 X Prevalence index is :53.0" 7 Morphogical adaptations` (provide 8 supporting data in Remarks or on a 9 separate sheet) 10 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation' 70 =Total Cover Woody vine stratum (Plot size: ) _(explain) *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be 1 present, unless disturbed or problematic 2 Hydrophytic 0 =Total Cover vegetation present? Y Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region SOIL Sampling Point: 1 -WET Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth (Inches) Matrix Color (moist) % Redox Features Color (moist) % Type* Loc ** Texture Remarks 0 -6 10YR 2/1 50 10YR 3/4 10 C M Clay Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots Crayfish Burrows (C8) Sediment Deposits (132) (C3) 10YR 6/2 40 D M Clay Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils 6 -24 10YR 6/2 90 1 10YR 3/4 10 C M Clay Gauge or Well Data (D9) Water- Stained Leaves (139) Other (Explain in Remarks) Field Observations: Surface water present? Yes No X Depth (inches): Water table present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 2 Indicators of wetland Saturation present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 0 hydrology present? Y (includes capillary fringe) Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: *Type: C = Concentration, D = Depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, MS = Masked Sand Grains. * *Location: PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators: Histisol (Al) _Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Histic Epipedon (A2) _Sandy Redox (S5) _Black Histic (A3) _Stripped Matrix (S6) _ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) _Stratified Layers (A5) _Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) 2 cm Muck (A10) X Depleted Matrix (F3) _ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) _ Redox Dark Surface (F6) _Thick Dark Surface (Al2) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) _Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) X Redox Depressions (F8) 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L) Iron - Manganese Masses (1`12) (LRR K, L, R) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) _Other (explain in remarks) *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric soil present? Y Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Surface Water (Al) Aquatic Fauna (1313) Surface Soil Cracks (136) X High Water Table (A2) True Aquatic Plants (1314) Drainage Patterns (1310) 37 Saturation (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) Dry- Season Water Table (C2) Water Marks (131) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots Crayfish Burrows (C8) Sediment Deposits (132) (C3) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Drift Deposits (133) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Algal Mat or Crust (134) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils X Geomorphic Position (D2) Iron Deposits (135) (C6) X FAC- Neutral Test (D5) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) Gauge or Well Data (D9) Water- Stained Leaves (139) Other (Explain in Remarks) Field Observations: Surface water present? Yes No X Depth (inches): Water table present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 2 Indicators of wetland Saturation present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 0 hydrology present? Y (includes capillary fringe) Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region Project/Site Glen et. Al City /County: Shorewood /Hennepin Sampling Date: 6/5/2019 Applicant/Owner: Shorewood State: MN Sampling Point: 1 -UP Investigator(s): Laura Wehr and Mary Boltri Section, Township, Range: 33, 117,23 Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): None Slope ( %): 3 -5 Lat: 93.6001276 °W Long: 44.9035551 °N Datum: NAD 83 Soil Map Unit Name L36A VWI Classification: Are climatic /hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year? N (If no, explain in remarks) Are vegetation soil or hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "normal circumstances" Are vegetation soil or hydrology naturally problematic? present? Yes SUMMARY OF FINDINGS (If needed, explain anv answers in remarks.) Hydrophytic vegetation present? Y Absolute Hydric soil present? Y Is the sampled area within a wetland? N Indicators of wetland hydrology present? N f yes, optional wetland site ID: Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Prior Period has been wetter than normal VEGETATION -- Use scientific names of plants. US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region Absolute Dominan Indicator Dominance Test Worksheet Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft ) % Cover t Species Staus Number of Dominant Species 1 Fraxinus nigra 5 Y FACW that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A) 2 Acernegundo 5 Y FAC Total Number of Dominant 3 Species Across all Strata: 4 (B) 4 Percent of Dominant Species 5 that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.00% (A/B) 10 =Total Cover Sapling /Shrub stratum (Plot size: 15 ft ) Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Total % Cover of: 2 OBL species 0 x 1= 0 3 FACW species 65 x 2 = 130 4 FAC species 60 x 3 = 180 5 FACU species 0 x 4= 0 0 =Total Cover UPL species 0 x 5= 0 Herb stratum (Plot size: 5 ft ) Column totals 125 (A) 310 (B) 1 Phalaris arundinacea 50 Y FACW Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.48 2 Poa pratensis 50 Y FAC 3 Impatiens capensis 10 N FACW Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4 Alliaria petiolata 5 N FAC _ Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 5 X Dominance test is >50% 6 X Prevalence index is :53.0" 7 Morphogical adaptations` (provide 8 supporting data in Remarks or on a 9 separate sheet) 10 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation' 115 =Total Cover Woody vine stratum (Plot size: ) _(explain) *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be 1 present, unless disturbed or problematic 2 Hydrophytic 0 =Total Cover vegetation present? Y Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region SOIL Sampling Point: 1 -UP Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth (Inches) Matrix Color (moist) % Redox Features Color (moist) % Type* Loc ** Texture Remarks 0 -24 10YR 6/2 40 10YR 3/4 10 C M Clay Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots Crayfish Burrows (C8) 10YR 2/1 50 Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Drift Deposits (133) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Algal Mat or Crust (134) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils Geomorphic Position (D2) Iron Deposits (135) (C6) X FAC- Neutral Test (D5) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) Gauge or Well Data (D9) Water- Stained Leaves (139) Other (Explain in Remarks) Field Observations: Surface water present? Yes No X Depth (inches): Water table present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 20 Indicators of wetland Saturation present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 18 hydrology present? N (includes capillary fringe) Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: *Type: C = Concentration, D = Depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, MS = Masked Sand Grains. * *Location: PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators: Histisol (Al) Histic Epipedon (A2) _Black Histic (A3) _ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _Stratified Layers (A5) 2 cm Muck (A10) _ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) _Thick Dark Surface (Al2) _ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) _Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _Sandy Redox (S5) _Stripped Matrix (S6) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) _Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) X Depleted Matrix (F3) _ Redox Dark Surface (F6) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) _ Redox Depressions (F8) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L) Iron - Manganese Masses (1`12) (LRR K, L, R) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) _Other (explain in remarks) *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric soil present? Y Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Surface Water (Al) Aquatic Fauna (1313) Surface Soil Cracks (136) High Water Table (A2) True Aquatic Plants (1314) Drainage Patterns (1310) Saturation (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) Dry- Season Water Table (C2) Water Marks (131) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots Crayfish Burrows (C8) Sediment Deposits (132) (C3) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Drift Deposits (133) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Algal Mat or Crust (134) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils Geomorphic Position (D2) Iron Deposits (135) (C6) X FAC- Neutral Test (D5) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) Gauge or Well Data (D9) Water- Stained Leaves (139) Other (Explain in Remarks) Field Observations: Surface water present? Yes No X Depth (inches): Water table present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 20 Indicators of wetland Saturation present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 18 hydrology present? N (includes capillary fringe) Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region Project/Site Glen et. Al City /County: Shorewood /Hennepin Sampling Date: 6/5/2019 Applicant/Owner: Shorewood State: MN Sampling Point: 2 -WET Investigator(s): Laura Wehr and Mary Boltri Section, Township, Range: 33, 117,23 Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope ( %): 1 -2 Lat: 93.5937120 °W Long: 44.9049295 °N Datum: NAD 83 Soil Map Unit Name U2A VWI Classification: PEM 1 F Are climatic /hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year? N (If no, explain in remarks) Are vegetation soil or hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "normal circumstances" Are vegetation soil or hydrology naturally problematic? present? Yes SUMMARY OF FINDINGS (If needed, explain anv answers in remarks.) Hydrophytic vegetation present? Y Absolute Hydric soil present? Y Is the sampled area within a wetland? Y Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Y f yes, optional wetland site ID: Wetland 2 Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Prior period has been wetter than normal. Lawn clippings and leaf piles were obscuring boundary. VEGETATION -- Use scientific names of plants. US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region Absolute Dominan Indicator Dominance Test Worksheet Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft ) % Cover t Species Staus Number of Dominant Species 1 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 30 Y FACW that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 6 (A) 2 Acer saccharinum 30 Y FACW Total Number of Dominant 3 Populus deltoides 20 Y FAC Species Across all Strata: 6 (B) 4 Percent of Dominant Species 5 that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.00% (A/B) 80 =Total Cover Sapling /Shrub stratum (Plot size: 15 ft ) Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Total % Cover of: 2 OBL species 0 x 1= 0 3 FACW species 105 x 2 = 210 4 FAC species 40 x 3 = 120 5 FACU species 0 x 4= 0 0 =Total Cover UPL species 0 x 5= 0 Herb stratum (Plot size: 5 ft ) Column totals 145 (A) 330 (B) 1 Poa palustris 25 Y FACW Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.28 2 Matteuccia struthiopteris 20 Y FACW 3 Alliaria petiolata 20 Y FAC Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4 Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 5 _ X Dominance test is >50% 6 X Prevalence index is :53.0" 7 Morphogical adaptations` (provide 8 supporting data in Remarks or on a 9 separate sheet) 10 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation' 65 =Total Cover Woody vine stratum (Plot size: 30 ft ) _(explain) *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be 1 present, unless disturbed or problematic 2 Hydrophytic 0 =Total Cover vegetation present? Y Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region SOIL Sampling Point: 2 -WET Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth (Inches) Matrix Color (moist) % Redox Features Color (moist) % Type* Loc ** Texture Remarks 0 -10 10YR 2/1 100 Drainage Patterns (1310) 37 Saturation (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) Dry- Season Water Table (C2) Peat Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots 10 -24 10YR 2/1 80 7.5YR 7/6 10 C M Clay Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils Geomorphic Position (D2) Iron Deposits (135) (C6) 10YR 5/2 10 D M Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) Gauge or Well Data (D9) Water- Stained Leaves (139) Other (Explain in Remarks) Field Observations: Surface water present? Yes No X Depth (inches): Water table present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 12 Indicators of wetland Saturation present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 6 hydrology present? Y (includes capillary fringe) Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: *Type: C = Concentration, D = Depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, MS = Masked Sand Grains. * *Location: PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators: Histisol (Al) _Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _ Histic Epipedon (A2) _Sandy Redox (S5) X Black Histic (A3) _Stripped Matrix (S6) _ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) _Stratified Layers (A5) _Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) 2 cm Muck (A10) _ Depleted Matrix (F3) _ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) _ Redox Dark Surface (F6) _Thick Dark Surface (Al2) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) _ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) _ Redox Depressions (F8) 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L) Iron - Manganese Masses (1`12) (LRR K, L, R) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) _Other (explain in remarks) *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric soil present? Y Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Surface Water (Al) Aquatic Fauna (1313) Surface Soil Cracks (136) X High Water Table (A2) True Aquatic Plants (1314) Drainage Patterns (1310) 37 Saturation (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) Dry- Season Water Table (C2) Water Marks (131) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots Crayfish Burrows (C8) Sediment Deposits (132) (C3) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Drift Deposits (133) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Algal Mat or Crust (134) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils Geomorphic Position (D2) Iron Deposits (135) (C6) X FAC- Neutral Test (D5) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) Gauge or Well Data (D9) Water- Stained Leaves (139) Other (Explain in Remarks) Field Observations: Surface water present? Yes No X Depth (inches): Water table present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 12 Indicators of wetland Saturation present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 6 hydrology present? Y (includes capillary fringe) Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region Project/Site Glen et. Al City /County: Shorewood /Hennepin Sampling Date: 6/5/2019 Applicant/Owner: Shorewood State: MN Sampling Point: Investigator(s): Laura Wehr and Mary Boltri Section, Township, Range: 33, 117,23 Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope ( %): 1 -2 Lat: 93.5936865 °W Long: 44.9048933 °N Datum: NAD 83 Soil Map Unit Name U2A VWI Classification: Are climatic /hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year? N (If no, explain in remarks) Are vegetation soil or hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "normal circumstances" Are vegetation soil or hydrology naturally problematic? present? Yes SUMMARY OF FINDINGS (If needed, explain anv answers in remarks.) 2-UP Hydrophytic vegetation present? Y Absolute Hydric soil present? Y Is the sampled area within a wetland? N Indicators of wetland hydrology present? N f yes, optional wetland site ID: Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Prior period has been wetter than normal. Lawn clippings and leaf piles were obscuring boundary. VEGETATION -- Use scientific names of plants. US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region Absolute Dominan Indicator Dominance Test Worksheet Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft ) % Cover t Species Staus Number of Dominant Species 1 Catalpa speciosa 15 Y FACU that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A) 2 Total Number of Dominant 3 Species Across all Strata: 3 (B) 4 Percent of Dominant Species 5 that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 66.67% (A/B) 15 =Total Cover Sapling /Shrub stratum (Plot size: 15 ft ) Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Total % Cover of: 2 OBL species 20 x 1 = 20 3 FACW species 20 x 2 = 40 4 FAC species 0 x 3= 0 5 FACU species 15 x 4 = 60 0 =Total Cover UPL species 0 x 5= 0 Herb stratum (Plot size: 5 ft ) Column totals 55 (A) 120 (B) 1 Iris virginica 20 Y OBL Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.18 2 Matteuccia struthiopteris 20 Y FACW 3 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4 _ Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 5 X Dominance test is >50% 6 X Prevalence index is :53.0" 7 Morphogical adaptations` (provide 8 supporting data in Remarks or on a 9 separate sheet) 10 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation' 40 =Total Cover Woody vine stratum (Plot size: 30 ft ) _(explain) *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be 1 present, unless disturbed or problematic 2 Hydrophytic 0 =Total Cover vegetation present? Y Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region SOIL Sampling Point: 2 -UP Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth (Inches) Matrix Color (moist) % Redox Features Color (moist) % Type* Loc ** Texture Remarks 0 -9 10YR 2/1 100 Drainage Patterns (1310) Saturation (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) Dry- Season Water Table (C2) Water Marks (131) Peat Crayfish Burrows (C8) 9 -15 10YR 2/1 90 7.5YR 4/6 10 C M Peat, Mucky Geomorphic Position (D2) 15 -24 10YR 2/1 100 Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) Gauge or Well Data (D9) Clay Water- Stained Leaves (139) Other (Explain in Remarks) Field Observations: Surface water present? Yes No X Depth (inches): Water table present? Yes No X Depth (inches): Indicators of wetland Saturation present? Yes No X Depth (inches): hydrology present? N (includes capillary fringe) Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: *Type: C = Concentration, D = Depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, MS = Masked Sand Grains. * *Location: PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators: Histisol (Al) _ Histic Epipedon (A2) X Black Histic (A3) _ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _Stratified Layers (A5) 2 cm Muck (A10) _ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) _Thick Dark Surface (Al2) _ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) _Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _Sandy Redox (S5) _Stripped Matrix (S6) X Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) _Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _ Depleted Matrix (F3) _ Redox Dark Surface (F6) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) _ Redox Depressions (F8) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L) Iron - Manganese Masses (1`12) (LRR K, L, R) _Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) _Other (explain in remarks) *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric soil present? Y Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Surface Water (Al) Aquatic Fauna (1313) Surface Soil Cracks (136) High Water Table (A2) True Aquatic Plants (1314) Drainage Patterns (1310) Saturation (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) Dry- Season Water Table (C2) Water Marks (131) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots Crayfish Burrows (C8) Sediment Deposits (132) (C3) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Drift Deposits (133) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Algal Mat or Crust (134) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils Geomorphic Position (D2) Iron Deposits (135) (C6) X FAC- Neutral Test (D5) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) Gauge or Well Data (D9) Water- Stained Leaves (139) Other (Explain in Remarks) Field Observations: Surface water present? Yes No X Depth (inches): Water table present? Yes No X Depth (inches): Indicators of wetland Saturation present? Yes No X Depth (inches): hydrology present? N (includes capillary fringe) Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region Project/Site Glen et. Al City /County: Shorewood /Hennepin Sampling Date: 6/5/2019 Applicant/Owner: Shorewood State: MN Sampling Point: 3 -WET Investigator(s): Laura Wehr and Mary Boltri Section, Township, Range: 33, 117,23 Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Depression Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope ( %): None Lat: 93.5909165 °W Long: 44.9037322 °N Datum: NAD 83 Soil Map Unit Name L22C2 VWI Classification: Are climatic /hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year? N (If no, explain in remarks) Are vegetation soil or hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "normal circumstances" Are vegetation soil or hydrology naturally problematic? present? Yes SUMMARY OF FINDINGS (If needed, explain anv answers in remarks.) Hydrophytic vegetation present? Y Absolute Hydric soil present? Y Is the sampled area within a wetland? Y Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Y f yes, optional wetland site ID: Wetland 3 Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Prior period has been wetter than normal. VEGETATION -- Use scientific names of plants. US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region Absolute Dominan Indicator Dominance Test Worksheet Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft ) % Cover t Species Staus Number of Dominant Species 1 Populus deltoides 70 Y FAC that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A) 2 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 30 Y FACW Total Number of Dominant 3 Species Across all Strata: 3 (B) 4 Percent of Dominant Species 5 that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.00% (A/B) 100 =Total Cover Sapling /Shrub stratum (Plot size: 15 ft ) Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Total % Cover of: 2 OBL species 10 x 1 = 10 3 FACW species 90 x 2 = 180 4 FAC species 70 x 3 = 210 5 FACU species 0 x 4= 0 0 =Total Cover UPL species 0 x 5= 0 Herb stratum (Plot size: 5 ft ) Column totals 170 (A) 400 (B) 1 Phalaris arundinacea 60 Y FACW Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.35 2 Typha angustifolia 10 N OBL 3 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4 _ Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 5 X Dominance test is >50% 6 X Prevalence index is :53.0" 7 Morphogical adaptations` (provide 8 supporting data in Remarks or on a 9 separate sheet) 10 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation' 70 =Total Cover Woody vine stratum (Plot size: 30 ft ) _(explain) *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be 1 present, unless disturbed or problematic 2 Hydrophytic 0 =Total Cover vegetation present? Y Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region SOIL Sampling Point: 3 -WET Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth (Inches) Matrix Color (moist) % Redox Features Color (moist) % Type* Loc ** Texture Remarks 0 -6 10YR 2/1 100 Drainage Patterns (1310) 37 Saturation (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) Dry- Season Water Table (C2) Water Marks (131) Peat Crayfish Burrows (C8) 6 -12 10YR 2/1 90 10YR 4/6 10 C M Mucky clay Geomorphic Position (D2) Iron Deposits (135) (C6) X FAC- Neutral Test (D5) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) Gauge or Well Data (D9) Water- Stained Leaves (139) Other (Explain in Remarks) Field Observations: Surface water present? Yes No X Depth (inches): Water table present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 6 Indicators of wetland Saturation present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 6 hydrology present? Y (includes capillary fringe) Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: *Type: C = Concentration, D = Depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, MS = Masked Sand Grains. * *Location: PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators: _Histisol (Al) X Histic Epipedon (A2) _Black Histic (A3) _ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _Stratified Layers (A5) X 2 cm Muck (A10) _ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) _Thick Dark Surface (Al2) _ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) _Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _Sandy Redox (S5) _Stripped Matrix (S6) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) _Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _ Depleted Matrix (F3) _ Redox Dark Surface (F6) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) _ Redox Depressions (F8) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L) Iron - Manganese Masses (1`12) (LRR K, L, R) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) _Other (explain in remarks) *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: High Water Table Depth (inches): 12 Hydric soil present? Y Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Surface Water (Al) Aquatic Fauna (1313) Surface Soil Cracks (136) X High Water Table (A2) True Aquatic Plants (1314) Drainage Patterns (1310) 37 Saturation (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) Dry- Season Water Table (C2) Water Marks (131) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots Crayfish Burrows (C8) Sediment Deposits (132) (C3) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Drift Deposits (133) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Algal Mat or Crust (134) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils Geomorphic Position (D2) Iron Deposits (135) (C6) X FAC- Neutral Test (D5) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) Gauge or Well Data (D9) Water- Stained Leaves (139) Other (Explain in Remarks) Field Observations: Surface water present? Yes No X Depth (inches): Water table present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 6 Indicators of wetland Saturation present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 6 hydrology present? Y (includes capillary fringe) Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region Project/Site Glen et. Al City /County: Shorewood /Hennepin Sampling Date: 6/5/2019 Applicant/Owner: Shorewood State: MN Sampling Point: 3 -UP Investigator(s): Laura Wehr and Mary Boltri Section, Township, Range: 33, 117,23 Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Terrace Local relief (concave, convex, none): None Slope ( %): 1 -2 Lat: 93.5909165 °W Long: 44.9037322 °N Datum: NAD 83 Soil Map Unit Name U2A VWI Classification: Are climatic /hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year? N (If no, explain in remarks) Are vegetation soil or hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "normal circumstances" Are vegetation soil or hydrology naturally problematic? present? Yes SUMMARY OF FINDINGS (If needed, explain anv answers in remarks.) Hydrophytic vegetation present? Y Absolute Hydric soil present? N Is the sampled area within a wetland? N Indicators of wetland hydrology present? N f yes, optional wetland site ID: Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Prior period has been wetter than normal. VEGETATION -- Use scientific names of plants. US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region Absolute Dominan Indicator Dominance Test Worksheet Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft ) % Cover t Species Staus Number of Dominant Species 1 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 30 Y FACW that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A) 2 Total Number of Dominant 3 Species Across all Strata: 4 (B) 4 Percent of Dominant Species 5 that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 75.00% (A/B) 30 =Total Cover Sapling /Shrub stratum (Plot size: 15 ft ) Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Total % Cover of: 2 OBL species 0 x 1= 0 3 FACW species 45 x 2 = 90 4 FAC species 15 x 3 = 45 5 FACU species 15 x 4 = 60 0 =Total Cover UPL species 0 x 5= 0 Herb stratum (Plot size: 5 ft ) Column totals 75 (A) 195 (B) 1 Phalaris arundinacea 15 Y FACW Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.60 2 Trillium flexipes 15 Y FACU 3 Galium boreale 15 Y FAC Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4 Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 5 _ X Dominance test is >50% 6 X Prevalence index is :53.0" 7 Morphogical adaptations` (provide 8 supporting data in Remarks or on a 9 separate sheet) 10 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation' 45 =Total Cover Woody vine stratum (Plot size: 30 ft ) _(explain) *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be 1 present, unless disturbed or problematic 2 Hydrophytic 0 =Total Cover vegetation present? Y Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region SOIL Sampling Point: 3 -UP Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth (Inches) Matrix Color (moist) % Redox Features Color (moist) % Type* Loc ** Texture Remarks 0 -8 10YR 2/1 100 Drainage Patterns (1310) Saturation (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) Dry- Season Water Table (C2) silty clay Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots 8 -10 10YR 2/1 95 10YR 3/6 5 C M silty clay Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils 10 -16 10YR 2/1 90 1 10YR 3/6 10 C M sand with gravel Gauge or Well Data (D9) 16 -24 10YR 2/1 85 10YR 3/6 15 C M clay Surface water present? Yes No X Depth (inches): Water table present? Yes No X Depth (inches): Indicators of wetland Saturation present? Yes No X Depth (inches): hydrology present? N (includes capillary fringe) Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: *Type: C = Concentration, D = Depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, MS = Masked Sand Grains. * *Location: PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators: Histisol (Al) _Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Histic Epipedon (A2) _Sandy Redox (S5) _Black Histic (A3) _Stripped Matrix (S6) _ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) _Stratified Layers (A5) _Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) 2 cm Muck (A10) _ Depleted Matrix (F3) _ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) _ Redox Dark Surface (F6) _Thick Dark Surface (Al2) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) _ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) _ Redox Depressions (F8) 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L) Iron - Manganese Masses (1`12) (LRR K, L, R) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) _Other (explain in remarks) *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric soil present? N Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Surface Water (Al) Aquatic Fauna (1313) Surface Soil Cracks (136) High Water Table (A2) True Aquatic Plants (1314) Drainage Patterns (1310) Saturation (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) Dry- Season Water Table (C2) Water Marks (131) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots Crayfish Burrows (C8) Sediment Deposits (132) (C3) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Drift Deposits (133) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Algal Mat or Crust (134) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils Geomorphic Position (D2) Iron Deposits (135) (C6) X FAC- Neutral Test (D5) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) Gauge or Well Data (D9) Water- Stained Leaves (139) Other (Explain in Remarks) Field Observations: Surface water present? Yes No X Depth (inches): Water table present? Yes No X Depth (inches): Indicators of wetland Saturation present? Yes No X Depth (inches): hydrology present? N (includes capillary fringe) Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region Project/Site Glen et. Al City /County: Shorewood /Hennepin Sampling Date: 6/5/2019 Applicant/Owner: Shorewood State: MN Sampling Point: 4 -WET Investigator(s): Laura Wehr and Mary Boltri Section, Township, Range: 33, 117,23 Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Depression Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope ( %): None Lat: 93.5965185 °W Long: 44.9058541 °N Datum: NAD 83 Soil Map Unit Name L9A VWI Classification: None Are climatic /hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year? N (If no, explain in remarks) Are vegetation soil or hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "normal circumstances" Are vegetation soil or hydrology naturally problematic? present? Yes SUMMARY OF FINDINGS (If needed, explain anv answers in remarks.) Hydrophytic vegetation present? Y Absolute Hydric soil present? Y Is the sampled area within a wetland? Y Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Y f yes, optional wetland site ID: Wetland 4 Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Prior period has been wetter than normal. VEGETATION -- Use scientific names of plants. US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region Absolute Dominan Indicator Dominance Test Worksheet Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft ) % Cover t Species Staus Number of Dominant Species 1 Ulmus americana 5 Y FACW that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A) 2 Total Number of Dominant 3 Species Across all Strata: 1 (B) 4 Percent of Dominant Species 5 that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.00% (A/B) 5 =Total Cover Sapling /Shrub stratum (Plot size: 15 ft ) Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Total % Cover of: 2 OBL species 0 x 1= 0 3 FACW species 5 x 2 = 10 4 FAC species 0 x 3= 0 5 FACU species 0 x 4= 0 0 =Total Cover UPL species 0 x 5= 0 Herb stratum (Plot size: 5 ft ) Column totals 5 (A) 10 (B) 1 Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.00 2 3 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4 _ Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 5 X Dominance test is >50% 6 X Prevalence index is :53.0" 7 Morphogical adaptations` (provide 8 supporting data in Remarks or on a 9 separate sheet) 10 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation' 0 =Total Cover Woody vine stratum (Plot size: 30 ft ) _(explain) *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be 1 present, unless disturbed or problematic 2 Hydrophytic 0 =Total Cover vegetation present? Y Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region SOIL Sampling Point: 4 -WET Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth (Inches) Matrix Color (moist) % Redox Features Color (moist) % Type* Loc ** Texture Remarks 0 -2 10YR 2/1 100 Drainage Patterns (1310) 37 Saturation (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) Dry- Season Water Table (C2) Water Marks (131) Mucky Peat Crayfish Burrows (C8) 2 -10 10YR 2/1 100 Drift Deposits (133) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Algal Mat or Crust (134) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils Mucky Peat Iron Deposits (135) 10 -24 10YR 5/2 90 1 10YR 4/6 10 C M Clay Water- Stained Leaves (139) Other (Explain in Remarks) Field Observations: Surface water present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 3 Water table present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 0 Indicators of wetland Saturation present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 0 hydrology present? Y (includes capillary fringe) Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: *Type: C = Concentration, D = Depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, MS = Masked Sand Grains. * *Location: PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators: Histisol (Al) Histic Epipedon (A2) _Black Histic (A3) _ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _Stratified Layers (A5) X 2 cm Muck (A10) _ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) _Thick Dark Surface (Al2) _ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) _Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _Sandy Redox (S5) _Stripped Matrix (S6) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) _Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) X Depleted Matrix (F3) _ Redox Dark Surface (F6) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) _ Redox Depressions (F8) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L) Iron - Manganese Masses (1`12) (LRR K, L, R) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) _Other (explain in remarks) *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric soil present? Y Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) X Surface Water (Al) Aquatic Fauna (1313) Surface Soil Cracks (136) X High Water Table (A2) True Aquatic Plants (1314) Drainage Patterns (1310) 37 Saturation (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) Dry- Season Water Table (C2) Water Marks (131) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots Crayfish Burrows (C8) Sediment Deposits (132) (C3) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Drift Deposits (133) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Algal Mat or Crust (134) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils X Geomorphic Position (D2) Iron Deposits (135) (C6) X FAC- Neutral Test (D5) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) Gauge or Well Data (D9) Water- Stained Leaves (139) Other (Explain in Remarks) Field Observations: Surface water present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 3 Water table present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 0 Indicators of wetland Saturation present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 0 hydrology present? Y (includes capillary fringe) Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region Project/Site Glen et. Al City /County: Shorewood /Hennepin Sampling Date: 6/5/2019 Applicant/Owner: Shorewood State: MN Sampling Point: 4 -UP Investigator(s): Laura Wehr and Mary Boltri Section, Township, Range: 33, 117,23 Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): None Slope ( %): 1 -2 Lat: 93.5964917 °W Long: 44.9058399 °N Datum: NAD 83 Soil Map Unit Name L9A VWI Classification: None Are climatic /hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year? N (If no, explain in remarks) Are vegetation soil or hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "normal circumstances" Are vegetation soil or hydrology naturally problematic? present? Yes SUMMARY OF FINDINGS (If needed, explain anv answers in remarks.) Hydrophytic vegetation present? Y Absolute Hydric soil present? N Is the sampled area within a wetland? N Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Y f yes, optional wetland site ID: Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Prior period has been wetter than normal. VEGETATION -- Use scientific names of plants. US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region Absolute Dominan Indicator Dominance Test Worksheet Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft ) % Cover t Species Staus Number of Dominant Species 1 Ulmus americana 100 Y FACW that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A) 2 Total Number of Dominant 3 Species Across all Strata: 2 (B) 4 Percent of Dominant Species 5 that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.00% (A/B) 100 =Total Cover Sapling /Shrub stratum (Plot size: 15 ft ) Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Rhamnus cathartica 20 Y FAC Total % Cover of: 2 OBL species 0 x 1= 0 3 FACW species 100 x 2 = 200 4 FAC species 20 x 3 = 60 5 FACU species 0 x 4= 0 20 =Total Cover UPL species 0 x 5 = 0 Herb stratum (Plot size: 5 ft ) Column totals 120 (A) 260 (B) 1 Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.17 2 3 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4 _ Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 5 X Dominance test is >50% 6 X Prevalence index is :53.0" 7 Morphogical adaptations` (provide 8 supporting data in Remarks or on a 9 separate sheet) 10 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation' 0 =Total Cover Woody vine stratum (Plot size: 30 ft ) _(explain) *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be 1 present, unless disturbed or problematic 2 Hydrophytic 0 =Total Cover vegetation present? Y Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region SOIL Sampling Point: 4 -UP Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth (Inches) Matrix Color (moist) % Redox Features Color (moist) % Type* Loc ** Texture Remarks 0 -24 10YR 2/1 100 Drainage Patterns (1310) 77 Saturation (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) Dry- Season Water Table (C2) Water Marks (131) Clay Crayfish Burrows (C8) Sediment Deposits (132) (C3) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Drift Deposits (133) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Algal Mat or Crust (134) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils Geomorphic Position (D2) Iron Deposits (135) (C6) X FAC- Neutral Test (D5) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) Gauge or Well Data (D9) Water- Stained Leaves (139) Other (Explain in Remarks) Field Observations: Surface water present? Yes No X Depth (inches): Water table present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 15 Indicators of wetland Saturation present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 11 hydrology present? Y (includes capillary fringe) Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: *Type: C = Concentration, D = Depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, MS = Masked Sand Grains. * *Location: PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators: Histisol (Al) Histic Epipedon (A2) _Black Histic (A3) _ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _Stratified Layers (A5) 2 cm Muck (A10) _ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) _Thick Dark Surface (Al2) _ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) _Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _Sandy Redox (S5) _Stripped Matrix (S6) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) _Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _ Depleted Matrix (F3) _ Redox Dark Surface (F6) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) _ Redox Depressions (F8) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L) Iron - Manganese Masses (1`12) (LRR K, L, R) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) _Other (explain in remarks) *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric soil present? N Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Surface Water (Al) Aquatic Fauna (1313) Surface Soil Cracks (136) High Water Table (A2) True Aquatic Plants (1314) Drainage Patterns (1310) 77 Saturation (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) Dry- Season Water Table (C2) Water Marks (131) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots Crayfish Burrows (C8) Sediment Deposits (132) (C3) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Drift Deposits (133) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Algal Mat or Crust (134) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils Geomorphic Position (D2) Iron Deposits (135) (C6) X FAC- Neutral Test (D5) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) Gauge or Well Data (D9) Water- Stained Leaves (139) Other (Explain in Remarks) Field Observations: Surface water present? Yes No X Depth (inches): Water table present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 15 Indicators of wetland Saturation present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 11 hydrology present? Y (includes capillary fringe) Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region ► FBI APPENDIX C Wetland Photos Wetland Delineation Report Glen Rd, Manitou Ln, Amlee Rd WSB Project No. R- 012786 -000 Appendix _.. Photo Point 1: Looking southwest to Wetland 1 Wetland Delineation Report Glen Rd, Manitou Ln, Amlee Rd WSB Project No. R- 012786 -000 Appendix _.. Photo Point 2: Looking north to Wetland 2 Wetland Delineation Report Glen Rd, Manitou Ln, Amlee Rd WSB Project No. R- 012786 -000 Appendix _.. Photo Point 3: Looking east to Wetland 3 Wetland Delineation Report Glen Rd, Manitou Ln, Amlee Rd WSB Project No. R- 012786 -000 Appendix ► FBI Photo Point 4: Looking north to Wetland 4 from wetland boundary Wetland Delineation Report Glen Rd, Manitou Ln, Amlee Rd WSB Project No. R- 012786 -000 Appendix NOY- 14 1 _ J Wetland Delineation Report Glen Rd, Manitou Ln, Amlee Rd WSB Project No. R- 012786 -000 APPENDIX i 1 � J Photo Point 5: Storm Water Pond r �r F Appendix ► FBI APPENDIX D Antecedent Precipitation Data Wetland Delineation Report Glen Rd, Manitou Ln, Amlee Rd WSB Project No. R- 012786 -000 Appendix NRCS method - Rainfall Documentation Worksheet Hydrology Tools for Wetland Determination NRCS EnOneerint! Field Handbook Chapter 19 Date 6/5/2019 Landowner/Project Shorewood Weather Station State Minnesota County Hennepin Growing Season 2019 Photo /obs Date 5-Jun-1 91 Soil Name shaded cells are (Long -term rainfall statistics locked or calculated (from WETS table or State Climatology Office) Condition 30% 30% chance chance Dry, Wet, Month < > Precip Normal 1st Prior Month* May 2.64 4.10 5.42 W 2nd Prior Month* April 2.11 2.82 2.11 N 3rd Prior Month* March 1.111 2.08 2.08 1 N *compared to photo /observation date Note: If sum is 6-9 prior period has been drier than normal 10-14 prior period has been normal 15-18 prior period has been wetter than normal Conclusions: prior period has been wetter than normal Month Condition Weight Value Value 3 3 2 2 21 1 Sum Condition value: Dry =1 Normal =2 Wet =3 Product of Previous 2 Columns K