The URL can be used to link to this page

030882 CC Reg AgP " ." ... ......._ __......... OO-d'-..4"""'- .....-........-.... """" CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MONDAY, MARCH 8, 1982 COUNCIL CHAMBERS 5755 COUNTRY CLUB RD. 7:30 P.M. AGE N D A CALL TO ORDER: a. Pledge of Allegiance and Pray~r b. Roll Call: Shaw Leonardo Gagne Mayor Rascop Haugen 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: a. Meeting - Febuary 22, 1982 [Attachment #1] 8:00 pm 2. PUBLIC HEARING - Of stead property subdivision request: [Attachment #2] 3. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR: a. Minnetonka Transmission Center - sign request: [Attachment #3] b. .It:;".,., No 11../4/: .$/;"'I'~ /... -t' 7/,:";.s,,;./ .- A'//.,edV~:Z:> 4. PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT: a. 5. PARK COMMISSION REPORT: a. 6. ATTORNEY'S REPORT: a. St John's Church - lot division request: [Attachment #4) b. Resolution - Minnetonka mooring fill issue: [Attachment #5] 7. ENGINEER'S REPORT: a. 8. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT: a. Recommendation on allocation of yr.#7 & yr. #8 CBDG funds: [Attachment #6] b. First reading of proposed Ordinance regulating "Games of Skill": [Attachment #7] c. Vine Hill rezoning request: [Attachment #8] d. Request for awarding of 1982 Noxious Weed Spraying contract: [Attachment #9] . .1 . ~ ... '. =- _.~ ,.- ~ .._.~~~._:?~..n :';~k". CITY OF SHOREWOOD COUNCIL CHAMBERS REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD MONDAY, FEBRUARY 22, 1982 7:30 P.M. M I NUT E S CALL TO ORDER The regular meeting of the Shorewood City Council was called to order by Mayor Rascop at 7:30 P.M. on Monday, February 22, 1982 in the Council Chambers. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE AND PRAYER The meeting opened with the Pledge of Allegiance and prayer. ROLL CALL: Staff: Mayor Rascop, Councilpersons Haugen and Gagne. Shaw arrived at 7:43 P.M. Leonardo arrived at 8:40 P.M. Attorney Larson, Engineer Norton, Administrator Uhrhammer and acting Secretary West. Present: Late: APPROVAL OF MINUTES - FEBRUARY22,l982 Corrections: Matters from the Floor - No Parking Zone Request Resolution No. 33-82 Administrator was instructed to send a letter and c~ll the City of Excelsior regarding the problem and the' City of Shorewood's actions. Minnetonka Moorings, Inc. - Fill Permit Council authorized Administrator to meet with the Engineer to determine which maps, in addition to wetlands, are needed by the city and have them drawn up. RegionalRailroad:Ad~isoryCommittee - Resolution No 34-82 Appointments to this committee are for six month terms. Moved by Haugen, seconded by Gagne, to approve the minutes of the Regular Council meeting of Monday, February 8, 1982 as corrected. Motion carried unanimously. PUBLIC HEARING - COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDS - YEAR VIII Larry Blackstead of Hennepin County spoke to the Council and the audience on the CDBG Program funding beginning July 1, 1982. Nothing was removed but mo+eflexibility has been incorporated this year. He stated that the program has shifted major emphasis from housing to economic development and job creation. Primary concern is still to benefit low and moderate income people. Shorewood's allocation will be 15% less in Year VIII than it was in year VII. e . Council Meeting - 2 - February 22, 1982 Council members questioned Mr. Blackstead on eligible activities and legitimate uses for funding: 1] Public Services: (Specifically crime prevention/law enforcement) Blackstead stated that Public Services generally involve day care, health assistance, aid to senior citizens, etc. but he would check into the law enforcement area. 2] Assessments to Homeowners for improvements such as sewer water and streets. Reductions are possible and up to 100% of assessments can be paid, but funding must be targeted to reach or benefit individuals who meet low income standards. Individual cities can set the income guidelines but they must not exceed Section 8 limits. Past special assessments levied prior to October 1978 do not apply. 3] Parks: Park funding is contingent upon a study of local neighbor- hoods to determine their economic make-up and needs. This was done in 1978 for Manor Park; a survey which separated Amesbury as it's own neighborhood. More funds could Poss- ibly be designated for Manor but that might require a new study. CDBG funds can be used to adapt public parks for handicapped persons with facilities such as drinking fountains, handi- capped spaces in parking lots, handicap equipped access trai19 leading to facilities in parks, and some playground equipment. A handicapped accessibility plan for public im- provement should be drawn up by the city which lists current facilities and those which are needed. Hennepin County is available for consultation. 4] Development: Funds can be put into programs aimed at retaining small businesses or to generate jobs (of a non-high tech nature). The objective is once again, to reach low to moderate in- come people. Blackstead mentioned a program in Mound utilizing a revolving loan fund to businesses for upgrading and improvements - low interest short-term loans. 5] Preservation and Conservation of Open Spaces (Wetlands): Wetlands can be included in funding programs if a problem exists; for example, a project to help eliminate a flooding problem in a low income neighborhood. 6] Rehabilitation: Rehabilitation appears to be one of the best w~ySto use CDBG funding. An upcoming report on rehab p:oJects by Hennepin County will detail the number of cl~ents served, dollars spent, and dollars remaining. e e Council Minutes - 3 - February 22, 1982 If the City of Shorewood determines that a dwelling needs rehabilitation but the owners do not request it, Hennepin County can send them a general letter explaining rehab programs. No staff actually becomes involved unless in- vited by the individual. 7] General Information Dollars from Years VI and VII can carryover to VIII. If any funds remained from Year V they could have been repro- grammed. For Year VIII the City should formally indicate what programs are planned and the Hennepin County staff will analyze them. (A resolution from the Council in April). No input came from the audience during the Public Hearing. The Public Hearing was closed at approximately 8:30. No action was taken by the council until specific uses of the funds could be investigated. PUBLIC HEARING - HOWARD'S POINT MARINA DOCK APPLICATION Resolution No. 24-82 Explanation of dock reconfiguration by Howard's Point Marina President, Robert Johnson, was explained. No new docks were requested - applica- tion involved moving 2 slips to north side of property. Mrs. Adeline Johnston, 5465 Howard's Point Road, could not ,attend the meeting but left a message with the City Hall staff - "No objection to dock re-arrangement as long as no new docks are added." Mrs. June Ridinger, 5330 Howard's Point Road, felt plans for recon- figuration were acceptable. She noted that total number of docks should be 38 according to discussions in the past. Moved by Shaw, seconded by Gagne, to approve the dock permit applica- tion. Motion carried unanimously by roll call vote. Public Hearing was closed at approximately 8:45 P.M. MATTERS FROM THE ,FLOOR a] Mrs. Ridinger mentioned a possible dumping violation on private property near Lake Virginia, Smithtown Road; the Hennepin/Carver border. Mayor Rascop instructed Admini- strator to investigate and contact Police Department, if necessary, to enforce zoning regulations. Mayor Rascop stepped down; meeting temporarily chaired by Gagne. b] Rascop submitted two petitions for street lighting; one for the intersection of Enchanted Lane and Enchanted Point, and Enchanted Lane and Enchanted Drive. The petitions included all full time property owners. Motion was made by Shaw, seconded by Haugen, to refer the matter to NSP for a report on appropriate placement and cost of street lights. Motion carried 3 in favor, 0 against. e e Council Minutes - 4 - February 22, 1982 Rascop returned to the chair. PLANNING COMMISSION.REPORT: No report - Meeting of February 16th was postponed. PARK CXM1ISSION REPORT: Council Liaison Shaw reported that goals and objectives for the coming year had been discussed at the March 15th meeting. A special meeting to discuss Freeman Park plans was under way. Administrator Uhrhammer noted vandalism in Cathcart and Badger Parks. Pop machines were damaged and money lost. They have been removed. Councilperson Haugen advised Council of $15,000. - $20,000. octagonal building from old Excelsior Amusement Park slated to be demolished. She approached developers to request they consider donating it as a tax deduction to Shorewood for a possible park building. The City would have to pay moving expenses estimated at $2,000. DOCK DISCUSSION Lakeshore property owned by Michael G. Arvidson (5595 Timber Lane) has docks but no primary structure as requred by ordinances. Mr. Arvidson came before the council with signatures of individuals attesting to the presence of three boat docks on property before June 19, 1973 when he became owner. He felt he was not in violation of ordinances because he was grand fathered in. The matter came up in 1978 but was not resolved. Attorney Larson stated that the ordinances do not provide for grandfathering but Council could decide to allow.. . . Council's concerns and discussion involved Arvidson's. use of docks - private versus commercial; easements; property ownership; ordinances involved and their enforcement. Motion was made by Haugen, seconded by Shaw, to table issue until next meeting. Council requested that the attorney with assistance from the Planner and Zoning Inspector, research the ordinances and their application to Arvidson's use of docks, whether residential or commercial, and form a legal opinion so the issue can be resolved. Motion passed unanimously. ATTORNEY'S REPORT: a] Dave Owen of Land Plan spoke for McNulty Construction regard- ing development of tennis court and trail in Amesbury. The planned trail is an 8 foot path to allow maintenance vehicles access to the tennis courts. Original development agreements between City and the developer do not address either. Gordon Lindstrom of the Park Commission recalled that any .~ype of black-topped trail-was written out of the agreement because of added noise and motor vehicle abuse. e e Council Meeting - 5 - February 22, 1982 Council was concerned about disturbing the neighbors and that the PURD objective to preserve open areas not be overlooked. Council suggested that the McNulty Company consider a trail through the Amesbury development rather than close to neighboring residents' property lines. Also to discuss plans with neighbors, particularly Stovers and Eiserts. Haugen moved, Gagne seconded, to table until developers have contacted neighbors. Motion carried unanimously. b] VINE HILL FLORIST PROPERTY Attorney Larson informed Council of problems caused by improper zon- ing of property at 19465 State Highway 7 -. split commercial/residen- tial. There is an ordinance insufficiency, the city was in error, and the developers should not be required to pay for correction. The Attorney will research to see if any general laws to control the situation exist. Council action is not required but the property owner could ask Council to act on its own motion. The Council tabled the issue until the property owner requests that the property be rezoned. c] RON JOHNSON Attorney Larson presented John Lee's letter regarding Ron Johnson (5355 Shady Hills Circle) stating Mr. Johnson's intention to remove outbuilding but not necessarily meeting March 15th deadline as requested by the City of Shorewood. Larson feels the City has worked hard, fairly, and negotiated in good faith to reso~ve the matter amicably. The next step should be to prosecute. Attorney felt procedures would move faster if criminally prosecuted. Shaw moved, Rascop seconded, that the City bring a criminal complaint against Ron Johnson. Motion carried unanimously. ENGINEER'S REPORT MINNETONKA MOORINGS Jim Norton reported that Minnetonka Moorings' proposed parking lot encroaches on wetlands. Haugen moved, Leonardo seconded, that Attorney draw up a resolu- tion to revoke the present fill permit requiring that Minnetonka Moorings cease and desist all activities regarding the matter, contact the City Engineer, and restore area in question to its original condition~ Motion carried unanimously. FROZEN WATER MAINS . Engineer and Administrator informed Council of frozen water main involving a Shorewood resident, Bill White (5865 Glencoe Road). The cost of thawing out the line was equally split between the property owner and the city. Councilperson Haugen suggested that the issue of responsibility for servicing the lines be addressed and a policy developed at "the special Council Meeting scheduled for February 27th. , e e Council Meeting - 6 - Febraury 22, 1982 ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT: WORK SCHEDULES AND BREAK PERIODS Administrator Uhrhammer submitted policy for Work Schedules and Break Periods for public works department. He stated that policies for office personnel will be developed. Councilperson Haugen suggested that Council Members report any policy infrac- tions to Administrator. SEWER RATES Ray Odde of Metro Waste Control Commission was contacted regard- ing excessive sewer charges for sewer service. He was in the propess of preparing a letter to Administrator outlining cost determination procedures,and expressed his availability to speak to the Council and noted an upcoming meeting with the Lake Mtka. Area Mayors' March 4th in the City of Mound. ICE RINKS Rinks closed as of February 23, 1982 due to melting conditions. MUNICIPAL WATER ISSUE Administrator requested that Council not proceed with water survey until a complete staff report can be made in May. Council needs to be fully informed on existing situation, 'aware of all problems with the water fund, and certain that a mail-out survey is what is needed as opposed to community education program on the water issue. An April meeting with bonding consultants, City Attorney, and the Engineer should provide answers/insights. ' MAYOR's REPORT CIGARETTE LICENSES Resolution No. 29-82 Shaw moved, Leonardo seconded, to approve cigarette license appli- cations for (1) Snyder Drug (2) Village Pump. Motion carried unanimously. HENNEPIN COUNTY RAlLROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY The Council requested that Bob Gagne express the following ideas about the Railroad Right-of-Way at the February 25th meeting of the Regional ~a~lroad Advisory Committee: a. Use abandoned railway as trail system for the present; reserve land, keep long range options open. b. Develop rules and regulations for trail. c. Vehicular controls needed, possibly barriers at road crossings to prevent abuse. d. Keep control Cat the local municipal level LMCD REPORT Hennepin County has arbitrary channels 40 feet wide, between Arvidson and Cross properties. Lake/dock useage has been delineated. Halsted's Bay Access - A moritorium is in effect on the Halsted's Bay Access. The LMCD wants more information from the DNR on the environmental and locationa1 effect of locating a public access in Halsted's Bay. -- ,. .... Council Meeting e - 7 - e February 22, 1982 SOLID WASTE Minnetrista was removed as a site. Council commended Haugen fer her attendance and input. COUNCIL MEMBER'S REPORT Councilperson Haugen reported on the Mobile Home industry's attempts at lobbying the State Legislature to pass legislation that would allow mcbile homes in any district within a municipality. APPROVAL OF CLAIMS AND ADJOURNMENT Approval of claims and motion for adjournment by Haugen, seconded by Gagne. Motion passed unanimously. Meeting adjourned at 10:27 P.M. Respectfully submitted, ~~rlv w.uk Kathleen A. West, Acting Secretary NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS INC. MH10RANDUM TO: Shorewood Planning Commission, Mayor and City Council FROM: Brad Nielsen DATE: 25 February 1982 RE: Ofstead Property Division FILE NO: 656.09 (82.01) BACKGROUND Ronald and Eugene Of stead , trustees for the estate of August Of stead. have requested to subdivide property located at 26915 Edgewood Road (see Site Location Map. attached). The property is currently occupied by one single family home and is located within the R-1, Single Family District. The site is approximately 12 acres in size. including the wetland area on the south end. The request involves splitting off two acres with the house along Edgewood Road. leaving a 50 foot strip for future access to the remaining 10 acres: Exhibit B is a copy of the applicant's survey showing the two acre parcel and the location of the existing house. Exhibit C shows the entire parcel and the proposed division relative to topography and lot configurations in the surrounding area. ISSUES AND ANALYSIS Upon review of the applicant's request and applicable City development con- trols, the fallowing issues are raised: 1. Lot Width Variancel' .The property in question measures approximately 240 feet along Edgewood Road. As mentioned, 50 feet has been pro- vided to the southern portion of the property for future access. leav- ing the proposed two acre parcel with 190 feet of width along Edgewood. The R-l zoning district requires that all lots have 120 feet of lot width, which by definition is measured at the front setback line. According to that definition, the width of the rear lot is only 50 feet. necessitating a variance t~ the Zoning Ordinance. For the most part, the variance is considered a technicality. Sinc~' the 50 foot strip remains the only access to the remainder of the par- cel, any future owner would be foolish to request a building permit 4820 minnetonka boulevard, suite 420 minneapolis. mn 55416 612/925-9420 4f;;L. Shorewood Planning Commission, Mayor and City Council 25 February 1982 Page Two for anything within the strip. The possibility of requlrlng the 50 foot strip to be dedicated as public right-of-way at this time has been considered. However, the road would then have to be improved within one year of approval of the subdivision. This would be imprac- tical from the developer's perspective since only two lots are pre- sently being requested and the existing house already has access on Edgewood Road. It should be noted that the property could be divided so as rot to require a variance. That is, two lots could be created, both having 120 feet of frontage on Edgewood. This would not be advisable, how- ever, since it could impact future development of the southern portion of the property. In that light, the variance is considered preferable to the conforming lots. As part of the variance approval it is highly recommended that the City require assurances that the 50 foot strip be used only for access purposes. Conrlitions regarding future development of the site will be discussed in greater detail further on in this report. 2. Variance to Sim le Subdivision Provision. Section II. of Ordinance 79 Subdivision Ordinance contains definitions related to the sub- division of property in Shorewood. Regarding requirements, the definition of "Subdivision" states ".. .upon approval by the City Council nothing in this ordinance shall effect, limit, or apply in the case where one lot is 'divided into two or three lots or parcels of land, the size of which subdivided lots or parcels of land conform to the City's minimum requirements of the Shorewood Zoning Ordinance and also abut upon a public street. However, ...." This provision is corrmonly referred to as the "simple subdivision provision", and allows certain property to be divided without formal platting. The variance discussed in item 1. of this report technically pre- cludes this request from the simple subdivision process. The cir- cumstances of that variance are considered appropriate grounds for granting a variance.to the simple subdivision provision also. The fact that the property could be divided without a variance bears repeating. 3. Potential Resubdivision. The property in question obviously has greater development potential than just two lots. At our request the developer has submitted a resubdivision sketch (Exhibit D, attached) showing potential future development for the rroperty. From this plan, two things can be determined: Shorewood Planning Commission, Mayor and City Council 25 February 1982 Page Three a. Water Policy. Since the property contains 12 acres in area, it potentially may have development capacity for 10 or more lots, in which case any subdivision \'lOuld require construction of a central well or hook-up to an existing water system. The applicantfs sketch has satisfied this office that the City's water policy does not apply for this request. b. Future Development. A resubdivision sketch provides assurance to the City that when a ~ubdivision request results in parcels of land which are much larger than zoning requirements, a reasonable means of redividing the property is still available. In reviewing the resubdivision sketch, we are convinced that the 50 foot strip is acceptable for future access. Some modifi- cation of the road and lot layout, however, is suggested. Recent development proposals for land on both sides of the subject property have presented an opportunity to take a look at the entire area in question. As can be seen by the attached exhibits, the area is bound by Edgewood Road and a wetland which sweeps down on the west, across the south and up on the east side into the proposed Oak Ridge Estates subdivision. Although a number of acre sized parcels have been carved out along Edgewood Road, a considerable number of larger parcels remain undeveloped. A recent development agreement for the Oak Ridge Estates project left open the possibility of creating a circulation loop which could serve the entire area. For background on that project, refer to our staff report: Oak Ridge Estates, 2nd Addition, dated 19 November 1981. Exhibit E conceptually illustrates a primary road pattern for the area. This plan provides a unified pattern which allows development of the whole area. Traffic generated by any such development would have additional east/west circulation without relying solely on Edgewood Road. It is recommended that the resubdivision sketch for the property in question be modified to provide for connection to the proposed circulation system shown on Exhibit E. Approval of the request at hand should be contingent upon the resubdivision sketch being recorded with the lot split. It should be understood that the City is not bound to the plan as in the case of preliminary or final plat approval, bat that the plan will be used as a guide for reviewing any future development request for the property. Shorewood Planning Commission, Mayor and City Counci 1 25 February 1982 Page Four 4. Edgewood Road. The right-of-way width for Edgewood Road does not conform to Ci'ty standards. In past subdi vi s ion requests, the Ci ty has attempted to acquire the additional right-of-way to bring the street up to current standards. It appears from the applicant's survey that additional right-of-way for Edgewood could be acquired with little or no impact on the existing structure. This issue should be referred to the City Engineer for review and comment as to necessary r.o.w. width. RECOMMENDATION Both the subdivision process and variance provisions provide the City the authority to place certain conditions on development request approval. While the Of stead request is basically for a simple subdivision, whatever approval is given at this time may have considerable impact on the future development of a fairly large area. It is therefore recommended that the City approve the variance for lot width and the simple subdivision procedure under the following conditions: 1. The resubdivision sketch should be modified to include connection to an overall area circulation pattern as shown on Exhibit E. 2. The resubdivision sketch should be recorded with the lot split and used as a guide for reviewing any future development request for the site. 3. Any future development of the southern portion of the property will be done as a formal plat of the entire parcel. 4. The two acre parcel which contains the house should under no circumstances be allowed to be divided until such time as a publicly dedicated street is constructed to the southern portion of the site. 5. Drainage and utility easements should be provided along the borders of the two acre parcel. If 6. Additional right-o~-way for Edg~wood Road should be required. 7. The 50 foot strir~t6 the rear of the site should be treated as a publ ic r.o.w. in the sense..that setbacks for adjoining lots should be 50 feet from the property line. Shorewood Planning Commission, Mayor and City Council 25 February 1982 Page Five It is important that all conditions placed upon the approval should be specifically stated and recorded with the County so that all future owners of either parcel are a\'iare of them. The request, as well as this report, should be subject to review and comment by the City Attorney and City Engineer. cc: Doug Uhrhammer Gary Larson Jim Norton Ronald F. Of stead ~ o rJl ~ Z Z ~ ~ 0I0lllI0 ~ 0 ~ >, " +-' b " S- ~ .' OJ ~ . '\ 0- ~ " ~ 0 ~ .J S- . l o. ~ ~ ~ 0 == rJl -~ " I ... e 32-117-23 \ ...... ;.', " ; ". ~ .1 ,. ! , . . N It.' .~ .. .,. ~ 4'.,. ~~1 " ~ ~ ... ... 0.. {' 1'0: .... ... ~ '" -. ~U' '* ~ ,." ... ... .. ...; ~ ~ I hnreby C'fn.tU'~. tb.t ti.i:. i~ u 1,rv~ 'Ine ('orrnet r~i)r\!~lm-""ltl~n or " f,ul'.ve.... of t;;i' ho:.:~J'\rloi: 0:' V".at oart of the Srruth 1.2: .86 r~~t~l. ~")r t!'-'-:! i'~")r~:.~~ /.37 .~(:: !f1~t :"1( triO ::orl:',\.Inc t .,; .:::' l.t~:- c __ t~". : I ' r ~.,~ .,. 'C1O . 5001 . . , ~:n~~~:,..:')r;t. {~\;:J.!'l.~t. ()~. ~,~,.t",~...." :.;:~, -;'(')\.1:: hi n 117 N':I'U. .','!:'" ~ ~3 "".:;. '. 0: tr.... /tl~ ..'rinC'lc;ut ~'(;ri':"";:~1 !.~':'=:F' '~~~L :)f", l'jneJ'.l""J\-':' ~':..t-, "~;',:.!.';l w;t,\.., ~h;~ ~I;ast lin(! :.If" ~-..~.--: "")f.t.r.\.....~..~~~ q',J'1;.t'-,~r or t.~;t~ ~~o~t.~.V(",ft .~~!~t:;"'~:.;r ~'rr~~. :1 :)f):.~!'. :~n t:~(~ ;,~):'U' 1 ::-.: " ;. ,;,; ~~()rt}",Ji~~;: ';'_J:~["'t.l.:'. ," .\ ~ .,...~.t.:"..e~l~ ':11:\' t !l" .!: ~ ':1:": 211.. () ;.,.... ~..::~', ;:';): t~I'~ "'r,lrti.'!:j.r1.. ,.,,~,,~. :'..::" :~!".~_ SO' ''}(J08 . \ \ \. L;nupor/JIIt.1 "",II, AIort-h ','nt. .; · ",y. . rs" "'". ". ",." ,\ .l ." :' 1 . ! 1~4~ \....}sl :~J;I."~~~~' ')!' ~~. " .-,r'~ :,,",..!~:, i~~-..~:'; t", ..: .... ,,~.:-. ,).'\;0 ~ ~ i.,~ l. ...r.t: i';"l~~t '-'1' O} ...!:~,.::.....\..l: \".' j t t: ~.~;,;: t : ~:~ :~ t 1.. ~ .."' to!" ,:.j;:-,t. .': ~.'! id ~:(\rl.~'. 1 i :~.~ ('~,' t~::. 1/.1.. 5A !"':,t~-. \rw .~:~ ~'r.l.. ~! I: i .. '. I.' ,"' ,...~. ," .' I 't. r I:!:U t..~ln Lr)t:.,.,t.~.."'" ,. . l L 1 ! :'. : ~~ to 1 ~. ( - - --~ '-. . __~Ji :.jil'f'~ tL....r..~....... ~,tOr..-. ::' ~,~ (}\.' (1 ~.~:..,:. .:~:!r~' ,~,(.~t!~'))r~t.,:.. . . 'r;:- r:0. :~'!: t :: '.... .,. ........,:, .(0 .. .~lJl/, I~ of #W 1, 01 ,./l./ ~ III S"",;'" JNf 7-1, . ~ -'--' .~'V . H4S li5f I;Nollllo/1411 '.. L IJIIY4 ./5r.f~II3t'~1:n ~ i I. ....--- .....--. .., . ..- -:: :':("~:p.: :'<:1 t,~ ~ 11, L'X:' ~. ~--~~--:- :~.:r'(' or; ~.. Cn:~-:" '~,..'.:. ..... I, :"l ;>-: 6-::;2 I r:J.'": ~rn r ~<e r .IJI;. : ':1:"":Jcr '::~. .~:-~.:.:--"r ~I.::n: :, l:{l~ t ~-:i~.,.'" C" l" Exhi bi t B SURVEY - 2 ACRE PARCEL ~' ~ J (a V~ ~~';\~[\~i~'~ . / Ltv/~~1. ~v;: "H~ tv ~ ~ ~\U ~'~-- ~:> ~~ /' '1 \' '- . I~'~ .i o~ ,\~ \.. ~ ..~" ~(ll i ~. '0 ..4 "" .~ 00-\ "" . 0 I \~. '\\ "'~..:<r .; ~~ ":\ i ",,- ~ ,~6"",-~~\\~1 \ J I \~~. .~...~.. ~ ~ . ~ ~. ~ '''--ft '--~~ \ 'i \\ ~$ ',.' I\.. ---~ ~ ~~~~ ~ 1 v-:: ~ ~ ~ 8; . _'Y ~~ ..... ... ~~ ~ ~~\t) \~ ~ '\ . I ~ ~ ~ ~ i. 'I _ '" J. '\\.. ~~, ~. ~ ~ '\ ~ '\~ ~,,,/ I ~ ~~ ~ \\\ J "i ,,\_~ "f ~~~_ "'~.~~~ ~ ,Yfr./ '\,I~ ~~-=-1:: '~---:! ~~~,~ " ,i I~~ ~(( :.,~ .i~ ~,,~'v ~~ I~ - ~~~ )'\ ,.;~ ~'lJr,,~~~, .~~i ~ '; \~ ~ ~~~~ .~ ~~~ '~~J i ~r/ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~\"./" Ii 1\ I-L~\ ~ ~ __ ~ __/, /"'" \'\ ~I' \ ~ en ~ 1'\1 ..,'~ ..' \... .i I ,.^\ . K!f.- ~ - ---;f::-Y -- .\~ \~:\ \!,,~ ~'Z ",'- , d r1-~ V '---~ // ~~\, \ ,,\ : . "--" "-.-----...:. -/ ~ \ \. ~~ ~ ~~ _.-,- " O.r . -S~ ~~~I~~~ '$A h'/! III ~ . r::::: ~ _ r-:=-- / ~ ~ \ __. L } 01?7~ / -J I . ~ ~~ .~ fA II I II . ~ __ --../ ' '/ I j ,...... " ,~_ , , \' ',' .. 'J. ..-;/ /~ ..J ::::: f ~ '\ILB 1)\ ..~. 'C' ~. rzr:.~I-"? ~J f)\- ' 'lr~./7~1~W~'r{j'~"_.=' !~;~ }.. -----.) Kv~ I f ~ .......,..-.,..LJ :::::.:1 1/ Ilih j :.::: ,~~, ~ q- '7'" . ~:}:. -;(t '::::: __ ,_ /" k7 '---]. ~- {::::. / j 'I, ... ::{:: """'1- . U...L.'- -. ...... /.1 .... ~ 0 h. \ [ .. , . ...... w......... .w.... .......... ':"':':':':':':':'.':' ":':':':':'.': :.:...:.:.:...:::.::.:.41: ~~ .. 1/ ~:;~~\i -1/ ~ ~02:;--=~~>W' ~ ~7 ' " '1.1/" '~ ,'". · i. ::: ::--.l :::o;:;r;j L..l.. ~/. F I "'A' '/ -1l -11 }:: ';". .....:lC::.. - - ~ _ 09~ ~v r n--'f ?:Ef) : ~ I :~::\: ::: :: ' :--:::... --::: ../'. . ./ ! I //~ VJ l~1 ,. ti:~4 .J.::" ~-=:: -..... ~ ~..J ~I_ _ --- _ 'iZ/; / r~.. i:\::\\ /:::' ~Y\\ "'~ ~ ~l \lZ.F-"". ~ / ~~ "'\ tJ "~m,,;;~tt~ 't r- ~/ /' / ( t7~, I- ~ ~1:~i\' (\r~&"d~~;~l~~~~,~?,:-:l ~ 8~~n r ~ : / .. I \~ .. ," " - - .: . ~ /; oe-,-I~ ~ /~ / '0 '01 \ '0 I ~~J '~~~ \ ~ / \\ I'" ~1-~~.l""'"~J~ ~~ ': ~ l--;--:r./ ~\ ~ ~~ ; 00//\ 'U' / A/:; I ~ --,-' .,. , '.J?r,. /!!(.)) \ /// ~~ ~ ~ .. - - ~ · . .. -r.H 'Yr-T / / I / / J/ /,/ " _ -- &~ ~ ~ -0./ g~~~ .. :." ~. ~ '~~A /. ~ : ~.- -"" \:: ~ U ,/ ~ /"/ 7 .. .. ., :h9S?",( =2--.( .. I~_t. ~_,~~< }4 ~-~ ." ... .. .. Exhibit C AREA LOT CONFIGURATIONS NlD TOP()G.RAPHY .. -:t .. .. ... .. --"11-- .. ... ;.;c . ~ .. -I ~ "ut.) e ,.s. ).." . .r~"C. . ! .' , --- -~ --- ...- - -..-.. - .. v. ~) ; \ ~.I ( .---- e -.._~-:- --'" . 2~:7 45 (C S .0(.,9) _{1t___ ! i I I ! 113375} b i I~ ~ ~t~. i'~ I ! \ L'U'1_ ~JZ..J..... ) .\J9'~l.1\ ;IN:5 ...... '" ...... ...... JV / '^ ,., ~ '" .....- l~ .. I I ;\... I '(. I I ~ ' '\., I () I - - - - ~ - - - . --\ '" ' ~' Cl\) I I 1 I 19'0 V~ I ~ 1 , \ \;) ~ ..,. .' ,. 2 8\ 3~1 ~~~., () tl ~1I0/"OO.! \ 1'1 J'I. S,# .Ff. I I ;-1 ~ ",,~.,_! II /f,~t~! r,.Ff. 1''J.. JO"I'. I (~jO \, ~ __~~~\__t'~__ ~ 28~O()O! . "I'I;170d! (,:) ....... _ 1'10.1="'1. J J".,. ,~t'. ,~ "... - - --'" ~ ". ',. __ ........ I '.II \111 -- , j{ y......... ........ I VI . I / _/ ~J r~ JY/ N .\It I( WETLAND . JI( 1:' '......... ~ *' .w )\ ~ , . MAX II1t(M NO. of L ors = 7 / '8 (~~ ()OO SlJ-.f'f. f) t/A/tJ6( t't:'/ PdO Tt?TA '- ,- 00> ~'4 .,.. , ....~ 58?OSs':'3 "f; :t o > . . , ,..:- " I: 11 I: ~ I ;. ;. " ~i .:::.' :", , ,.... I I H'\ ~~ ~ .' . .' . " 't~1 !i. __... .__ .__ ,,; :'. I..J .. ,,.. ~. I",. ItC to \-"' I~ I.~ r'~ , ~3;Oi ,\4.1 .~ 0\ oV) ~ ~ o v (:)~ ~~ .. , :vB,'48 5Z'w Exhibit D APPLICANT'S RESUBDIVISION SKETCH - ~Q~~ I \ -.' ''''~. ':U~'~llf~-~'~~~~ ~/JI!//~~ .. tY ,',". ~ 'i~o~\lY i ~ ~~~ ~ I\(H; ( ] \\ ~ ",., '- ~ h}~ ~ 1~ ~ ~ 0" 'V r-.~< ~ . I.~ .' .. .:{' ~\' ') ~ ~ ~ rrr: v.:;. ~" ~ ! ~ I 'I -.. '" I ~~~~, "~"" ~ ~~ ~ ;A~ ~__~~ ~ "f \ I' ~~ ~ ...~~~~~\\~'(~~-t~9V ,--',"-- "" ~~ ,~~ ~~\~'i If . ~\ ~__ ~".i .~ "."'~\~~'~ :~ J .: \\\ ,~(~( _., ~~ ~,~~<~~...../~.r..?;:'''5:0~~ J ",--'- ~i\ '\ . .~-'-~ C.) /~ Ii,,) ~ -- -. ~~ .. ~' ~ /tr:. ,~ "'~~ '~~ ~ \ ~ ,~.~ ~ 'lkl~rS',~)~.~ 1/ ~ 'a ~ ~. ~ ~ : .'.~-?:..." "~! i t. ~ll ~\ ~ ' .' --:/ /; - 'J~\;,:- ~:i \~ !fen]~ \\. ~ ~"- -:::.' ~~,:t;. ~ ,. I .\\ ~~ .\\\\\\\ ~ ~ln ~ ~~ ~ ~~~~ ~~-r~5~1 \ -..! ) l ~ - y ~ .. -' -,v.,' " \-- .\.~. ~'..: ---. .. ( -~ ~ --~I"'''' I'" '\ \ '\........, "..... ~'~//JI ""~ ~~ "'~r ~"'~~~\\ '.', "",ci;//L~ ~~~;;~~~~'~~)1)\4:t.~,- . ~, ----:-*, ~ :/1?f'~ ~ ~ )l~ ~~I) VJ~'. / I: .. . '-. -: ~ - - ---- ~ \ _ --! 1 )J rf;" rr // / ~ I , I ~ -.. ~ '------- :t '/A ! I , --\=:~O..IS /7 !S...~\ ..... 1\\......... ... I I I -1J ~~~ .~8J~ ~\ ~~~~~/ / ~II. 1 1!I . '''...-.J i=: ~:--".. . .... ......... ....... . .Wn.'. n.' w_....:...:.: .: .: .-.:, '\ . .. ",. - -: m' ill / ../ J _.I U I q : ~S'~! 17 r ~h/ D' '~,; ;:~ ~Fr;==" ~': ~~: ./ r ..v .J. / ~ 1/;;.. -l .:':':' "-i ~ - ~-f t-J r'~ ~.>;f~ 1/1 t:l ~..... 7 0 f. .'... ..... .... ..... NW ~.. ...........w.w .":':'.':. :':':'.:' ....:.: ..' .,;'i' ~0 V . ., 11 ~:" -1t j G-'~=~":"~5--~7 .~.~ J 'j,~t '". ~ J. :. ~~-:~ ~96-.:~7rre.;r- ~ AY,f/f'l'/rJ (~/ ~ ~ I ..' -- / . 1/ aw / A "/,,4 1 '1'1-1 A il 11 \} ~. ~y~~ III>C~~ ~~~ F ~;.~ ~, · ~m;:aI'N;!fi1"Z~~ r;: : -'----1/ ~., ;ff ((~ \\ ;~~ In, r\ " ~:' i!:11i '~"Mm.:.((~.{(!..~.:.............::. .:.~::::~...\\ \~"~\'~::i:::.::::::::::::;::::~:: :.!I ~~~~~\ (~-r;]lrr;J;"<<'r"'~\'J,"I) ~ :~ · ;;::;"IX [ + ]>'. IL I ~ I \~ .. " /'; ~Di '" " ~ /' .. /. //..d. - ~I..I \ .. : I ~~.~ ~ \ / / \\ I ~,.. m j~ld, 05): ~ "'~-~~v j\ ~ G~J0P \0 I/~~I;r~~ -~/.. ," \ '.~..0l. .~, I (/~I~"'-:'; ~ ~~ "'II -- -t t . - .iI , ,..) r:-r / T I I I I II / ,,/ _ ...- ./ . ~~:::- ~~ ~g/.Aw<-! "'II i. "4 -., \~ . . ~.AJ /'. .1jr" "* ~,,~_ -""Ii' \: -~ ~..I.{ ,..1=/9 C.) -.---J 4" 7 ... ... .j t - - -_ __-- . .. Exhibit, E t .. -II .. .. PROPOSED~,CIRCULATIOII PATTERa ;W~ ~_ t .. _.. .j .. _ - ~ ',. .. .._...o1...-...,."It ... .. ~ .. o ~ .~ .. I --l!1- - _._~ I, e e -7' 1-, ,) TO: Mayor and Council members FROM: City staff DATE: 3/4/82 RE: Minnetonka Transmission -- sign request We have searched through the city's file on the property in question and have examined all the minutes of the Council and Planning Commission meetings that have references to the project and property. We have not been ablet6 :fing any references or comments concerni~ signs that mayberequestedontnepr6perty. Attached to this memo you will find the section of the Zoning Ord. that regulates signs in C-3 zoning districts. You will also find the following documents: 1. A copy of the minutes of the council meeting where the original application for the Building permit was approved. 2. A copy if the permit application to install a lighted sign. 3. A diagram of the sign that the applicant wishes to install. 4. A map showing the location where the applicant wants to install the sign. :/f:3 r- ....-....,............". .:ci' ...................._..._........-,.. ~"'''l' . ........ ........... "',.. . - U'. ,"m II 'WIII;."t I',IIJVIIUfJN, "IIINt "I 'It" "",,,tlv"',,n ,. '''"'''''''~ II.. ""',..,,. ". 'hI' ..ell.,n I' '" "",vitI. '''''''.1I1t '''' Ih. I". ."., """'.V .., .1.... II It ........'1.., II.., ,..'" ..,,. .11 Ilnltt'II'''' 1I1II..tllllI ...." II.MII'''''.. ........ .",. .,,,, ..,........ ..",lI.V" "11'" . "''''111'... IIn"" I II PII,vl.I"", ". I 'I. ....1\"". 1\1 II.. .."'. II"'.. Ihlt ..,,,.... '....'11'.11... III., 11'1'" II . ..""". """ 'n r'III11.,. '"1''' "I...,.V. .. "vn, ..'III.. 'h. vl....I 'I.mlnt o. 'h. publiC '''''I'O''W'V 10 b,llIu "'.".v" hi ",. lIublh;. 1.11".. '."on, .nd ".nd.,d, .,. .,'.""'h'" her.ln ..0n.I.'.n' with Ih. tvP'''' II.. "'0,.11.1 ."" tit. ..... ell" .. It'llltt.. I.. the ..hUh I, Witt. ,.."... tu tl,n, ,"v.,UlIItnu .....h.... 'I'.'. 'II.-h ..u..,......... fl.". ....,. ...vl.... .fI., ..Uf....'.""", ."."n. D,th.' m....,.. .hlt"I.I..U ""hU'. ....n. u' .....,.. .'.., ..... "...,.. u, ..,... ,.. ,... h ...... .nfl .r. '......,,,.ttv ,,,,..ut..,l:. ..Ut.HIU Itlh.. 'hll'U., t.. ....It. ...."'V. ....nr'.III ,.", ."'""t "t" ""'"'VI In I...." d.m.II.I"" 111111110; .tI."II."'. ....,.."."'..n :1, Q&Nt.III\I. 1I1;14IJIII"MkNTlI IlIc.p, .. ol".,wl.. '''''",,1''.'' IIV II." ...'h'". tlV"' .. ".11"." 'n 1\1111'"."'"'' " ,,' tt.r-tl"n 4. w".,. ,I.,nlltl.,I. oh.1I nl111I"u wII" III. '"lh.w ..." ,.c,..tr.,".""... - ". Nil ".."An'Un. "v" "..11 ... .,",w.d wl1.r. th'" ,. ""I IIvI 1111 ..., ". ...,,,tr." to..II' ..,. ....10 opee.. Nil "In .".11 n. IOc...... wllhln tw.nlv C'O) ...10' ."V ,",.,...tllI", U. W.II "on, placed a'laln". nr .lIached to the allt.rlor wall. of bulld'n,I ,".11 nu' ...'.nd b" yond "'t..n CUI Inch.. of Ih. wall IUr'a~ ,"d .....11 be p.,all.I to Ih. p'ln. 0' th. bulldlno wall. Such II,nl Ihall not axc..d 'orty (40) IQUIr' f..t In ar.. unlo" mada of Incllmbultlb'O ma,orlalllPproved bY th. Building Inlpector." ..", C. No temporary lion Ihall be allached to I light at.ndard or th. lupportln, pylon of a fr.... \'andln, II,n. T.mporary IIOnl mUlt b. ...pedltlously r.moved bY '1'10 responllbl. parllol upon ..rmlnatlon of allowab'e time period Ipec'fI.d In the permit or thll ordlnanco. D. No Il9n Ihall be erected near or at any Intersection o. any ItreoU In Iuch manner as to Oh- ..ruct fre. and c'ear villon. or at any location wh.re by realon o. pOllllon. Ihape. or color. It may Interfere with. Obstruct the view 0'. or be confused with any authorized traffic sign. signal. or device. f. Ae'ore .nyelec'rle sign Is InsUlled In pile., 0' 'ha wlrtng In 'he same concealed. Ih. ereclor ," ",.""f.elm., "'.....f 111111 ""Illy 11'1. pulldlng In.paelm W"" '''all "'.~. '" havlI IIMd... "n 10",'.,1111" "I """ .1,," wtllllll '"'1'1'1'""1"".' hili"" Th....".' II .I'I""v..1 411......'If'u.' IIV I h_ h""O.,.II. '~h' 'h," mav III~II 10. 1".1" ,,1111 I,Ian. 1\ II., "" I, ohlll I' WI u. lu.11I1 ....hIlM" III '''..., II... Ih,lhl'"" '""'M.IoII .h~lI "I,~h' '" 1I11f!1l..1 11,,1 " 1,",,1 I"','H III "' .,,'1 ." "",.,,, N 'h..,.".t h ,I...'., tilt . I I. OM.lllI.,",,! '"1''' lIHI It~WM. IIWh,III 1111' hllll'rIl1hl' I V t1"M \ 11'1 110101 ,. II ""'"11"11 "" I' 1 Ill' 1.."I"11l '~I't1hlr '11111, 1~~'I~II.ttIH' ',ltll' .11 I,ll '''''11''''-' "'1'1. ., , "' 1 I '" I 11'1. r "" .11 "111'1 1"1 '1'111' III ""It 11"11'"1 III r.\ hi 111'''11'' ,.1"", ,. ',lllillll ...., .,.'111 I..,.,ltl "",.,..,""111111 11-11111111111\1 llilllllll ri~~IAlljl' "..tullvl"..n ,j' ,;,nN 'iII\NU1\IlU<; IlY lONINo UIS' RIelS: A. General: The Inllnwln'. slqn standardS by zon,nQ district Ihall apply 10 "verv ox 1\t1nq lOnlnq fll\lrlll .nd nftw lun."'J <<J1\lrU..1 hllrfldft.,r Gr..led un.e" OUIIHWI\O flIeIUn,\lv IHOytltfllt In '\114 It /unlfv, dl\trlf,t'\. Only '.lIjll\ .n dfl\c.,Ibed her. In 'hall be perrnHtttd In 'Meh pdrllculdf lun'utI distri~l. B. SI'Inl Permllled In All Zoning DlstrlcU: Subject to th. olher condlllons 01 Ihll ordinance, the 101l0wlng Ilgns shall be permllled In any zoning distrIct wHh'n the Village: I. Construe lion Slgnl: One non-illuminated temporary sign facing each bordering street. idenlilyln'l all par.ies engaged In the conltructlon O. a building, provided that Ihe sign shall no, ...ceed 'hirty.live (351 IQuare feet In area. does not obs,ruct the vision In the public way and is removed within 'hirty (301 days following occupancy 0' the building. 2. Commercial Real Ella'e Signs: On. non. Illuminated real ella'e sign not over twenty (20) square feel in surface area advertisIng the sale. renlal. or lease of only the building ,or prem- ises on which i, is localed. 3. Residenlia' Re~I Eslale Signs: One non.illumlnated rea' estate sign nOI over six (6) square teet In ~urface area advertising the Solie. rental. or lease of only the building or premises on which il i~ located. 4. PO'itical 5.gns: POlitical signs shall be permitted on each 'ot for a period 01 sixty (60) days prior '0 and len (10) days aller an election. 5. Owner.Occupanl Sign: One residential name. sign no' to exceed one (}) square foot in Mea, identilying only the name of the owner or occupant of a resldenllal building. 6. Home occupation Sign: One non-Illuminated Identification sign, not 'to exceed one (l) square, lOOt ,n area, lor Ihe following permitted uses: resident professional offices. home OCCUPatiOns and DoardinC}"'odglng houses. 7. Directional and Private Trallic Control Signs: Directlona' and private (raffic conlrol ~ig"~ Indicating Iraffic movemenl onto a premise. or within a premise, not exceeding three (3) \Quare feel of \lJrface area for each sign. are permitted. No adverlising me~S,lqe "laY be Incorporaleu on \UC,' sign\. e. 5.gn Permitted in Residential Dls'riets: SUbject '0 tho other condilions of this ordinance the 10110w.ng \lgns Shall be permitted in resldentla' districts R-}, R-2. and R-3: 1. Subdi.,slon Plat Signs: Temporary ligns advertising a new subdivision plat provided luch signs dO not exceed Sixly (60) square feet in aggregate surlace area. identifying only the p'al In whiCh Iney are located. are non-illumInated. and are erecled only at dedicated streflt entrances to the pial. Such ligns Ihall.be removed'lf construction of subdivision improve- ments is not in progress on the plat .\('Iltllin sixty (60) days following 'he date of the sign erection or as soon as eignty (80) percent of the lots are developed and sold. 2. Residential Housing Deve'opment Sign: One relldential housing developmen, identlflca- '"on sign 'acing each bordering s'ree' Shall be permilled for each development 0' Iwenty (201 or more uni's. Such sign shall no' exceed thirty.lwo (32) square feel. Such signs shall be erec'ed only at Ine dedica.ed street entrance, may be indirectly Illuminated. and shall nol exceed a height 01 eighl (8) feet aDov. grade. 3. C'uD, Lodge. Ollice Si'lns: One non-Illuminated identillcalion sign not 10 exceed twen'y (201 Square feet in area lor Ihe rollowing uses: club,s. lodges, Craterniliel, and prolesslonal 011 ices where permilled. 4. Civic, Religious Drganizationl. and Other Permitted Non-Residential Uses: One IlIumlna" ed or non. illuminated sign no, '0 exceed twenty (20) square ree' in area. Such sign may In. clude the lollowing uses: offices 01 a civic or rellgleus organization. S. Public and Semi. Public Use Signs: One Ulumln.ated or non.illuminated identification s,g., or bulletin Doard not 10 exceed a 'otal of twenty (20) square leet in area 'or Ihe 101. lowing uses: pUblic scnoals. parOchial schoofs. eolteges. pUblic libraries. museums. social and recreational buildings. parks,playgrounds, churches, cemeteries. and governmental of- hCl buildings.. D. 5,gns Permilled ill the C.} District: Subject '0 other conditIons 01 this ordinance. 'he 101. lo"".ng slgn\ Shall be per milled In the C.} Dillrict. L Signs as Permilted to Residence Ois'ric's. 2. Business Signs: A male imum of three (3) business signs facing each bordering street shatt oe 11f1"\lted In surfac.e area to a lolal of flfly (50) _square feet for each main building or each bU!.lneu tn a series of attached businesses such as a shopping cenler. Such signs shall be wall signs or attached '0 a marQuee. ). Area Identification Signs; One sign for business complexes of four (4) or more stores In the C.} District may be erected. Such sign shall De IImiled 10 a freestanding sign not to ~ exceed one hundred (100) square feet in area. ~ E. 5.gns Permilled in Olher Non-ReSldentia' Districts: The following SIgns shall be permilled in - / the e.2 and e.3 Districl\; 1. Signs a!. permitted tn other districts: Signs as permilted and regulated for I he u\es In the Res.dence and C.} D.""cts. - 2. Business Signs: Eicn mal" building or business in a series of attached bu\inesses, such as a snopp,ng center, may na.e three (31 business signs. Two (2) 01 such business s.gns shall D~ lllnlted 10 ten (10) \Quare teet tn area. One business sign may be of d"Y type to it maximum (If one hundre<.1 and fifty (150) SQuare feet in area. // II e e COUNCIL MINUTES - 2 - . August 27, 1979 BOULDER BRIDGE 'DEVELOPMENTS ' " Tom Wartman, developer of the, Boulder Bridge Farm, appeared before the Council and reviewed the background on the ,attempt to develop the PURD development, including the, slips on the lake. -Another hearing is now scheduled on September ,4th. .He indicated that if the slips on the lake are denied, he would be requesting approval of a new development with 100 to 130 units, including a common ramp to the lake. .No action was taken. "../b ~ BUILDING PERMIT - 'MINNETONKA'TRANSMISS!ON ~ ' Moved by Keeler, seconded by Haugen, to approve the application for a building permit for Charl~e Howe for Minnetonka Transmission, at 24275 Smithtown Road (Co. Rd. 19) further, that the occupancy permit be subject to a conditional agreement for the grading, landscaping, blacktop, fencing and parking; to be worked out by Naegele, Keeler, and Attorney for the approval of the Council at a later date. Motion carried by a unanimous vote of the Council. ELMRIDGE CIRCLE - EASEMENT'VACATION A representative for Brian Zubertof 5320 Elmridge Circle, lot 2, Block 1 of Elmridge, appeared before the Council to request vacation of a portion of the utility easement along the west side of the lot. Moved by Haugen; seconded by Shaw, to table the request until the next meeting to clarify the survey and the easements. Motion carrie~ unanimously. NEAR MOUNTAIN PROPERTY RESOLUTION NO. 60-79 Petition for Well Feasibility Study Acknowledged receipt of a petititon from Near Mountain Properties for a feasibility study on a well to serve the Shorewood portion of the Near Mountain Project. .Following discussion, it was moved by Shaw, seconded by Haugen, to approve the petition and authorize the Engineerts to make the report as requested in the petition; costs to be borne by the property owners on a special assessment basis. Motion carried uanimously. PROPERTY DIVISION -:~.GAL!S- 28100 Woodside Road RESOLUTION NO. 61-79 Moved by Keeler, seconded by Haugen, to adopt the recommendation of the Planning Commission to approve the division of Tract B af Registered Land Survey No. 757, 28100 Woodside Road, on the application of Wm. Galis owner, into two lots (one with existing house) as per survey by Schoell- ~adsen, dated August 1, 1979 and further that any building permit request- ed for the new lot must have Council approval. Motion carried ur.ar.imously. ~IR~ET LIGHT - Gillette Curve and Minnetonka Drive " Mo~ed by Haugen, seconded by Shaw, to approve the lnstallati6ri of a s :reet light at the intersection of Gillet te Curve and ~Iinr:etanka Drive in accordance with the recommendation of the NortherJ~ Stare: r(),::er Company to the exact placement. .Motton carried by a ur~anir;:2u;' .iote. Before digging call local utilities TELEPHONE. ELECTRIC. GASElc. 1 r: Q !.! t R ::!') BY LA \^' ?roperty O'\.mer: ;r~e.~_JiL;'!V ~,~__E I 0 IV k /+ If? IT IV ~ /n' 5' $" ; CJ A.; S"J1t7H/~w/V R,')!91) .. r~ct Number & Name(J ... ~ · ~ennit II c:i)YdlC;""-.)/J~tf2~ Pennit Fee L~C'r, - ~lan Check Fee Pennit for: S \ "fII . . '. utate Surcharge J Metro S.A.C. New Construction o o D o Date Paid SUBTo'rAL Remodel or Add Sewer Penni t II \'iater Permit II TOTAL. Well Permit 71 Fire Repair (For Office Use only) WARNING CITY OF SHOREWOOD -- BUILDING PERMIT ~PPLICATION Add.ress _ J.. L{ ~1.1 ~- Contractor: 5'ELr _ ~ 1319 kER,. Address_~ b I ':J-) VL~ ),. iELr3~ II'-< IC. i.lame C;y. ( (~l ~ r () );J e A(ljuntelt $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ .--.---- $ $ ROU7ING M 7 1'1 -/ ----- .~ G '- "] ___ ;: JI A__L. E~= I .... , /1gtIL,: 1- Date h"I?:~J' ~== _ 'YI I ._._1 (! E ~ 0:= '" '-/74 --1.../ I </ ~ __Telephone, 1. Legal Jescription of Property including Street Address if known: __Telephone ,4)t..{"'-3 C');).. Plot Plan: Attach plot plan of lot showing location of any proposed or existing buildings on same with respect to boundary lines. Show on plan present or proposed location of water supply,facilities and water and sewer supply piping. Plot plans are to be certified. by a surveyor. Disposal of surface water must be sho~m. Soil Bearing Test may be required at foundation level by a minimum of two borings by a Professional Civil Engineer. Hames and Addresses of Sub-Contractors or Installers of: 1. Construction 2. Sanitary Sewer Connection: s. \:e11 and Hater Supply System: Construction Information: 1. Estimated value of work for which permit is requested, not including value of lot. ~ 2. Type of work to be done: (Frame dwelling, remodel, other.) St ~ - ' ( L~ A~Ct4/ Attach copy of working d1"a.wings. for (wm.ch construction penni t is requested. 3. 4. if improvement includes well. e t~ .i, I / I ' ;_.' 'l ~I,,-~ Signature of Appllcant Attach domestic water supply specifications 5,q-rn ri-. Cvd It A- T l/ (,~a:/ -. '- -. '..~..- " t. 6,""p. 0 "" ~' e .), 1 iv . p~~ , '. .'" - . '~,-'t , ..~ /:1_ .'-"-- e _ II II t I " L{ ...j. 1..(0 )( (~ PAi~t6D . fJLPrS T.'e- ;=~ , .lCoJ I 't-"'- I ! ' 0:1' . ~. l>I .Jo! '!, . ' '" J \ ' '~I i .~~b1 '.P " ~;~' r Vlyr'- I' j'fi , " i':" !,.,.' \.., i / t t ...i '.iQ .. /{'.,' l'1.'AJN ~ 7tJfV F"" :; '11l I'-IIJ Sin'S S U "". tJ.;' ., .,II., r- L.- ...., ~ #. -j __ i ).', ': . " , \ \t)\ K:f ~ - . ., \.. ...j/~i?;;, )},.,(.;,.\:; . !.~,~i1."J"'V~';'<1' . . "",~ifi!,,'!!I,..;,?;j,'f '. ~;. ":,~;',t;~:\tJ:~~'"r.~,~"','.:':',;', '.(r .. .;:, ",;.,.'~ " . . -. ::.~. . . ~ . ,- I' il ( ! ! '-". ,/ : - --~_:....- I, -. ~-&--.. . ~- l \\ l / '. ~:' ~. J... f __ ~tcU L~ C'tfl L / cJ .. 1 .... i . . '1 . . l . 'J,,) ,-~ f; ,-{,,-,t , l(b~ "~ . d~ C ec# . 'i~'" \Ai \l..~'\. 0" - . ' . . , ;.. r 1 :I I ! I I I '- _.._------~ - e e Ii' I ". - c..: ,. , ~e(.I::5> '\' ' " J a ';" " '1" "up6A1,,/ . ,"'",., "C' I \ ~\,."i;'.) . ( ~;T '\. Ji.- . ,.' ._--""" _~_ *' S I ...^' . '1 '.J I i..,,1,4 tC'~ ! .-..-. ~. ...... ..- ! ,:0 " :' - 1 " , ; '~ --".~-:~,:;-1 I I ~ ' '".,,:, ", '" ". \ ' I .... ' , . ,,', ~ ;'''\ ~ . :t- ' ,; . -.0' ' ! ' , ' j I .. i - i ! I bo...... I . . : I "''\'. , I ...,:.. , " T. '1 ': 1-' ,: /oJ , ...t) . 'V, ~ <r ~ -t.... 'YlI~t4. I I . , \. ! :i", r Kf1' ,v 5~ LlO': - . ; i i ,. : ~ ! I -{" 'oJ.,: [t" ~. V(\ ~ j , / . '. "-r"' , 'it I j , I ! ! I. I , I ! t I I 9J C' '!' I:l '\0 ~ I ~ C) , } '/ I I I . I i .r~~ " ., , '. .~ ":;' i\ t; .... , :;~ \;.~- .. 76-<1 ' 1'" , /nf;.,b(, 13L 0 &, " (t ,qAcJ .. " rI ~ e e Case No. CITY OF SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA APPLICATION FORM Comprehensive Plan Amendment .rt.:. l) Conditional Use Permit Zoning District Amendment Variance . i Text Amendment Subdivision .p.lanned Unit Development St. John the Baptist Church of Applicant. Excelsior (Na me) 680 Mill St. (Address) Ovmer St. John the Baptist Church of Excelsior 680 Mill St. (Name) (Address) Property Location (~treet Address and Legal Description): Legals, plats etc. attached. Description and/or Reason for Request (Cite Ordinance Sections): 474-8868 (P hone) 474-8868 (Phone) In signing this application, I hereby acknowledge that I have read and fully understand the appl icable provisions of the Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances and current admin istrctive procedures. I further acknowledge the fee explanation as outl ined in the application procedures and hereby agree to pay 011 statements received from the City pertaining to add itional appli cation expense. %/YC>.-s t (Date) ~I --- I GITHWOL. OBERHAUSER 8: RAN!.LL. L TO. " , i '/ O'NEILL J. GRATHWOL 1905-1974 A TTO"N~Y. AND COUNSrLO". AT LA W 1421 E. WAYZATA BOULEVARD. SUITE 210 WAYZATA. MINNESOTA fS5391 , ) t 1'.1' ~//):k> ,'-'" J ~.J (612) 475-2401 JAMES N. GRATHWOL LOUIS B. OBERHAUSER ROBERT K. RANDALL JOHN W. HENDRICKSON, JR. TIMOTHY O. GRATHWOL KURT D. SCHUMAN February 4, 1982 ~ Gary Larson, Esq. Penberthy & Larson, Ltd. Attorneys at Law 264 Water Street Excelsior, Minnesota 55331 Re: Church of St. John the Baptist Our File: 94-6 Dear Gary: You will recall that sometime ago you and I talked about the application of the Church of St. John the Baptist to the City of Shorewood for a division approving sale of church lands south of the road behind the church. You indicated recording of deeds granting a road easement was necessary for approval of the division. 1. A 25 foot road easement is provided as follows: a. Document number 4676152 filed 10/7/81, Hennepin County Records b. Document number 1455469 filed 1/19/82 together with Document number 1455468 certified copy of corporate resolution Files Registrar of Titles creating Certificate of Title No. 620028 and residue Certificate 620029. 2. An additional 25 foot easement for a total 50 foot easement is provided across the Minion property as follows: a. From Church of St. John the Baptist Ducument number 4689985 filed 12)1'1/B1, Hennepin County Records and b. From Minion Document number 46B~B6 filed 12/11/B1, Hennepin County Records. 3. A mortg~qe p~rtial release Document number 4696482 filed 1/19/82. Would you please verify these filings and once you are satisfied se~ the J e e Gary Larson, Esq. James N. Grathwol, .Esq. Re: Church of St. John the Baptist Page 2 matter on for hearing at the March council meeting of the City of Shore- wood so that we may obtain a certified copy of the resolution approving the division and file with it the deed from the church to Minion. If you have any questions please call me. Yours truly, JAMES N. GRATHWOL JNGrf c.c. }1rs. Florence Friede II"Mr. Gary Minion Mrs. Betty A. Rehaume I. ",f · S " \ let . -. taL- ..1('-:"......- ~ ~ ~ ,.~ e @ ."~ Of ~ JV 51/2 @ 56 G' "'9< ...0 ~ ..' ,/ . . ::- .. . ------.. - ~.lLa5( '" (lCJ:lSIOIt VIu.aC( Cl'SHO!i(WOOO ~ ~, t::! ' -,. n, " ", :,.... ;, . .1 I .--.' .. ~ ..... I} I' ~1, ,( ,....,..-~. , t1tJ(,.,':" .::'- III L ~, I r " v ~I ~ I) ,- \ ",I ,/~ t. ,''''' I I~ ~(. ; (t/ ~ I (.v 12~ r~---- , 1.1,.".,.) - - v-' fJ~/-1" -- ..-.:1 - . I .J.1 \.11 " }I< 11 f-____-'lL___J__.l__ _ -': j..' l- I ...\~ ~ : \,) ~)A 1(-' ~ ..... lI' ~. L .ll...J - 124' ~., ij I~' ~--:..-, I.:....c, : O~ I ~~ . to;) ~ '~ I I I .. "'- l" I l \.,0' 122 .i I ~ & ~;-.. "" ~ ~ ~ ~) "29 '1 ~ - '-.." .- 13 " ~ "'0 I I S\O~-~ 7'~ o.~\~'\ '-: . t;\}V . (.) 136 1 ::" OJo,t tJI 'Z' r,) .... I. .- tfl 126 , I' J:'...J k,'.z~ ," ,a .' ..;," .. '~ 0") \1.0~ ,n ~\}~ 13~ (,j) " . II \ l~ ~ .. -.1>11 ..., ","_Of '_r WOQO t.1l.. ':'11'1'" llal' C1.lm O...d. ("l'rJ,Jontion to r..orpor.UoD. e Form No. 31-M. A,. ","", Oll..l. Co., J41nnioapqlh. M6nn. .~ne.ola l:"ifor In ('UIU.,..trina lil~nL.1 .( U31). Q:bis 3Jnbcnture, .Af~ thi........................................... day 01............ ..... bl'tu're n .TD~.. . Gh4.rch. ..9,f ....s..t. ,.....J..9.hn...th.e...Bi;\ p..tist... ...als.o....kuwon...as ...The.. Chur.c.h Baptist of Excelsior, Minnesota religious a/corporation under the laws of the State of...........~~.~!:l:~~.9.~.Cl........................................, paJ'ty of the first pari, and The City of Shorewood ..' ............ _......... .............. ........ ...... .............. ......... .................................................. ........... .... ........ ........... 0" .... ...... ........ ............ .~....... ....... ..... ,...... ......._. ........ ......... .' a C'mporati()n under the la.wI of the Sta.te of............~~~I,1.~.~.2.t..~.......................................................................................... .... .. , party of the sec()nd part, ........, 1.q..~..1.., of. S.t...Jo.lm..t.lla.. ()t1 e....n?.1.~i~~.~~~~.~~~.h.~~..~~~.~..~.;;.;~~.f.~~.;~~~~~.t.~;i.9.l~~~~..~.;~~.~~~;;.~~;~.~~~~.~O;"~.~.~~e~;j,x to it in hand paid by the said party of the lecond part, the receipt whereof i.s haeby GA:kn()ldedfrd, d{'I'.S hereby Grant, Ba1'~ain, Quitclaim, and Cont.ey unto the said party of the second pa1't, its SIU'Cfssors and as,~i{ns, F07'eL'er, all the tract.......... or parceL...... of land lyin{ and beint in the County of...... ....)I~I1~epin............. and State of .Minnesota, desrribed al follows, to--u'it: The ~orth 25 feet of the East 50 feet of Lot 122, Auditor's Subdivision Number 120, Hennepin County, Minnesota. (Certificate of Title 514543) An easement for street and road purposes over and across the tracts of land described as follows: A tract of land 25 feet in width, the Northerly line of which is as follows: Commencing at the Southwest corner of Lot 4, Wheeler's Outlots to Excelsior; thence East along the South line of said Lot 4 to a point distant 245 feet ';est along said South line from the Southeast corner of said lot and there terminating. (2456 of Deeds 596) This instrument and covenants and agreements herein contained shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the parties hereto and their successors and assigns and shall operate to extend in a Westerly direction the 25 foot wide easement heretofore granted to the second party by grant of easement between the parties hereto' dated July 31, 1959, filed for record on November 23, 1959, document no. 3208402 and recorded in Book 2235 of Deeds, page 568 in the office of the Register of Deeds for Hennepin County, ;.linnesota. '" . "# ..i.~. ~tiltc of .ftlinncsota, County of H€!nnepin J... On tJtota ry Publi'c....... .................... day of .- ............................................ ...., 19 .8.L., before nu, a .............................. ....... ...u'Uhin and for laid CounhJ, personally appeared ................ ............................ .......... ...... .......... ........... ........... ....... ..and ..................... .......................... ..... to llle prru)lwlly k1/{'lf"n, ll'1w, bein{ ellch by me duly sU'OTn. ... did say ih.~t..~.j;.~~..~.~~..;;;;~~t.i.~:;i.~. tJu ........ ........... Presidcnt und the f th I' d' J . . . ..................................-................................ .........0 e corpora Lon name In t Ie fMr(r'!1l{ ln~t~nlfnf. and that lhe scal aflLud to laid inRtrument i& the corporate seal of laid corporation, a;d that saId In~/l1lntC7d /l'as si1ned and leakd in behalf of said corporatwn by aulhority of if,s Board vI..... . .. ...... ..... .. and !laid........... ................_.................................................. ................. ............ ......... and acknowled{ed $l1id instruTlt('nt to be the free act and dud of ,aid rFJI7,oratwn. \\' .rranty n.td. (~f'l)(J,,,ti,,n to Individual. e Form No. 7-M. a. JI1l11or.Dul. c.o., Mlnn'Al",n., Minn. .ooto UnHorm ConH."ndn~ Blanko (1131). 1!:IJis 3Jnbcnture, Mack thia.......h.............h. ......day Of.'h' 19h' between The Church of St. John the Baptist, also known as The Church of St. John the Baptist of Excelsior, Minnesota Relig;Qus a/rorpo1"otwn uruler the lau:s of tM State Of...h..... M.inn.esota .. TJart!1 of the first P(l1.t, OTIlI Gary S. Minion of the County of.hh........Henngptn. part Y . of the second part, hh"hh arul State of. hJ:-1j nnesota UlitncS5CtIJ. That a,e said party of the first part. in con..~;deT'ation of t1le sum of ..'OnehDoJl?\.r....9..D.q....Qtb.~.r....gQ.Q.Q....9..I1.g..y.~lI,Hib.l~....Gons.jQe.Y.'g;t5on.:::::::::-:-::::-:-:-:--:-:,:,:':"- - -:-::- - - - - :-.- - -.'1JOLLA R S. tn it in hand paid by fhe said part..Y..... of tJ~ 8ccond part, the receipt where.of L~ h<'.1"ell!1 nr],..n()1/'.7l'd~ed, df)('.~ hereby Grant. Bar~ain, Sell, and Convey unt.o the said part. Y .......of the .~c('(md part, h1 S heirs and assi~ns. For.el'er. all t.he tract. .......01' parceLh..ol land lyinff and brin1 in the COllnt!1 nf .. ..........................E~n.I1~p1n... ...and State of .~finnesotn. described as 10llo1l's. tn-wif: That part of Lot 125, Auditor's Subdivision No. 120, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at a point in the West line of Lot 125 distant 200 feet North from the Southwest corner thereof; thence East parallel with the Soutn line of said Lot distant 533 feet; thence Northeasterly parallel with the Easterly line of said Lot to a point 335 feet North measured at right angles from the South line of Lot 125; thence East parallel with said South line to the Easterly line thereof; thence Northeasterly to South- east corner of Lot 119; thence West to Southwest corner thereof; thence North to North line of Lot 125; thence West 333 feet; thence South at right angles 300 feet; thence West at right angles to the West line of Lot 125; thence South to beginning. Also, the West 200 feet of the North 300 feet of Lot125, Auditor's Subdivision No. 120, Hennepin County, Minnesota, and also that part of Lot 119, Auditor's Subdivision No. 120, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying Southerly of the South line of Government Lot 1, Section 35, Township 117, Range 23. State Deed Tax Due Hereon$ ~n :?lllt\1t. nnh In ibnlh Ih,."~nnl". '1'",(1'11,1''' willi nU f.1/P. hf'.1'l'n.i.fa.num.ts und avtmrtcnanCC8 fhel'ClInfo ~tatt of ;fElinnt5ota, } Cou nty of........H~.D.I1e.Pi.D........................................~~... ss. On thia.................H. ...........dayof.. H............ . ....H........... ., 19..... , before me, a Notary ..P.ubljc............... within and for said County perso7W.lly appeared ReverendGera ldL ..Frier... ............... ....... ..'mJiJx he ; s to me personally known, wh.o, beint~X by me duly sworn. ..he..did 8ay that )tJU'l~XIX'X re.~pectil'cly fhe p.as;tQ.r.............~)(ja( ...................................... ....................h...... of the corporat.ion named in the fore~oint instru'Tl'tCnt, and that the seal affixed to said instrument ia tM corporate ,eal of said r.orporntirm, and OlAt said inJJtrument WQ..6 sitned and sealed in beho.Zf of said c.orporation by autharity of its noard nf Di rectors......., .............and said. Reverend Gera1 d. L. Frier. . and .............................................. ....................................acknowledted said in.strument to be the free act and dud of said rn/'!>oration. ....LI.,- ...c-....n. ...r*.,T ,.,,.'" .......... III ~If"''''' nv f' .~..~. Jor I>f'''d I"';:-It'<l~;()~ Vendor e I) l' .' , '0. ""1.111' ii' ,I., I', ! . , . ~.. (I~. \ I' d I" -I, Form No. 56-M. . \' \1 "",,," I '" I "''', , tcl)iS ~grecnlcnt, J/acIeand~ntendinfo thi" ....It).. .. ~, 19 g J , by ancl betll'een . The. Church of St.John t.he known as T~ Chdrch of St. John the Baptist of Excelsior, Minnesota. a Religious Corporation, XJXfJO( "P.1:1..n tm.. x.<< ~ >tJJx X1171X>-y:yfx W)QIJJjotl. m .... a ncl Gary V.Kirt ............ ............................................ day of Baptist.. also Minnesota , Tudy of the first part, ..',......................................................................................................-............................... .............., part y of the second pa7,t; UlitnC5SCti). That the said party of the first pa7,t, in consideration 01 the C.QL'cnants and agrc.::- . 11l en t s of sa ill party. .. of the second part, hereinafter contained, hereby sells and a grces to convey J{Jffc i a 1 said part..y 01 the second part, ........hts..he.ir.s............................and assigns, by a Warranty except e 'assess- accompanied by an abstract evi.d.cndn~ good title in party 01 the first part at the date h.crcol, or by an ments oU'ller's dltplicate certificafe 01 title. upon the prompt and lull perlormance by said part y...of the sc.co7ld pad,ol . bi S pa7.t 01 thi! a~rcement, the tract ...............oll.and lyin~ and bei71~ in- the COlLnty 01 Hennepin... .. . and State of .Min7lt'-sofa, described as follows, f.Q-u'it: All of Lot 122 and those parts of Lots 121 and 124. Auditor's Subdivision Number One Hundred and Twenty Hennepin County, Minnesota described as follows: Commencing at a point on the West line of said Lot 121 at a point distant 497.8 feet north of the South- west corner of said Lot 121; thence at an angle to the right of 70 degrees 47 minutes a distance of 183 feet; thence at an angle to the left of 26 degrees, 38 minutes a distance of 66 feet more or less to the most ~esterly portion of the East line of said Lot 121; thence north on said ~esterly portion of said East line a distance of 80.5 feet to an angle point in said East line; thence at an angle to the right of 82 degrees a distance of 77.2 feet to a second angle point in said East line; thence.north on said East line a distance of 100.2 feet to a point 87 feet south of the Southwest corner of said Lot 122; thence at an angle to the right of 90 degrees a distance of 66 feet; thence at an angle to the left of 90 degrees a distance of 87 feet to the South line of said Lot 122; thence east on the South' line of said Lot 122 a distance of 295 feet to the Southea~t corner of said Lot 122; thence north on the East line of said Lot 122 a distance of 260 feet to the Northeast corner of said Lot 122; thence West on the North lines of said Lots 122 and 121 a distance of 660 feet to the North~est corner of said Lot 121; thence South on the West line of said Lot 121 a distance of 653 feet to the place of beginning, according to the plat thereof on file or of record in the office of the Register of Deeds in and for said County except that part thereof embraced in Tract A. Registered Land Survey No. 391. Files of Registrar of Titles, County of Hennepin. , , ~ogether ~ith an easement for drive~ay purposes over and across a strip of land 20 feet \ in width adjacent to and south of the most Southerly described line of the above described tract. . .llt h$ .!fIutunllp klgrrcb. fly nnd betn'eUl. O'C TJtl7'titITlereto, Oint the time of paymmt ,hall be IIn r~untial flfl7't 01 thi.. c01ltrnct,' nl/(I flint all thc rm'r7Innf, a7l/1 II ~,.unrcnf, Turcin rnnfnilltd ,halt run I/'ith fhr- [rontl fllId bil/ll fhr TI/'jnl, r,\'((,/Ifl/"~, (l(ll1lini~l/'ILto",~, 6/((,c(8.~or, nr,c1 (lSSi~71B of OIC rC3pt'clit,tJ lXlI'tiel 1. r "rln, (~ II . ) \\. J' \:~ '- 3ln .tf:rst(mol1p R1bcrco!. The Mi(l fir..t flfIT'fy has catUul fhne ll/'c~,.nfR to l,e CXCl'utrc1 in ill c-arpornle 7In7nt! II!! it! l'rCRiuC7lt a"-,l ittl nntI its rorp/Jrate ual to llc ',err/l7lfn nffi,ucl, and said pnrt y of O,e 8cconcl part ha S lrcrtU"to ICt hi s 1wnd the clay antI y('(Jr first auot'c lL'J'ifkn. i The.Church Of.St. JDhn the Bapt1st, also I know.n as The Church of St. John the Baptist of ~JExcelsior, Minnesota a Minnesota Rel1910Ui.(Orpor...ation /:1~~{ cYl=Kt Reverend Gerald l. Fri er . . 0 ,,~~c:tnr . e RESOLUTION NO. WHEREAS, it appears that the City Building Inspector issued a fill permit to Minnetonka Moorings, John Cross as owner, for grading and 3,000 yard of fill dated December 31, 1981, Permit No. A-163-81; and WHEREAS, it appears by report of the City consulting engineer, Orr-Schelen-Mayeron & Associates, Inc., dated February 10, 1982 that fill has been placed in a designated wetland without council approval. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Shorewood as follows: 1. That Permit No. A-163-81, dated December 31, 1981 is hereby revoked and all authority thereunder cancelled. 2. That the City Staff is directed to inform the applicant forthwith of said revocation and direct him to remove all fill which has been placed in the protected ~etland areas. 3. That the City Engineer is directed to supervise the removal of said fill and to further report to the City Council. 4. That if applicant wants a hearing before the Council concerning the cancellation of said permit, he shall make a written request to the Council no later than 10 days after the mailing of a copy of this resolution to him. Thereafter, the Council shall promptly schedule the matter for hearing at a regularly scheduled meeting. 5. The City Clerk is directed to send copies of this resolution to the various units of government which have an interest in this matter. s- . , ",J. e t.:(, e TO: MAYOR and COUNCIL RE: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDS: Year IV - (1978), Year V ~ (1979), Year VI - (1980), Year VII - ..(1981), Year VIII - (1982). (See attached sheet) FROM: DOUG UHRHAMMER March 4, 1982 Upon reviewing the attached sheet, you will notice that in the year IV, CDBG entitlement period, project #083 (Manor Park) has a balance of $686.00. This balance has been applied fo~ and all bills of sub- stantiation have been forwarded to the County. We are currently waiting for these funds to be sent to us. In year VI and VII, there is a balance of $85,103. for Housing Re- habilitation - (Project numbers 586 and 576). In year VIr there is a balance of $8,300. for Special Assessment Grants, Water and Sewer Improvements (Project #308). The following table shows the balances in each activity as of Decem- ber 31, 1981: Diseased Trees Housing Rehabilitation Special Assessments $ 5420. (p# 682) 6000. (p# 405) Total $11,420. $45,103. (P# 586) 40,000. (p# 576) $85,103. $8,300. (p# 308) $~OO. = $104,823. In project year VIII, the city will receive $41,055 in CDBG Funds. I have checked with Hennepin County to determine if the 1982 CDGB Fund could be used for Cri~e Prevention, support of a public service officer, and the purchase of a computer. None of these ideas can be supported with CDBG Funds. As a result of the February 27, 1982 Council Meeting, I would like to make the following recommendation concerning the allocation of Year VII and VIII CDBG Funds. All of the following recommendations have been approved as legitimate expenditures under the CDBG program. a. That the City Council hold a Public Hearing on March 22, 1982 to reallocate $8000 of the $40,000 set aside for Housing Rehabilitation in year VI~ for the purpose of continuing the Comprehensive Planning Process through the development of needed maps. The money would cover the purchase of a base map, parks map, wetlands map, utility map, and present land use map. & . . MAYOR and COUNCIL - 2 - March 4, 1982 b. That the City Council allocate the $41,055 Year VIII fund- ing in the following fashion: 1] $8,000. for continuation of the Comprehensive Planning Process for the codification of all city ordinances. 2] $16,000. for Housing Rehabilitation 3] $ 9,055. for Tree Removal Grants 4] $ 8,000. for Special Assessments Grants, Sewer and Water. By allocating CDBG Funds in the recommended.way, we can immediately purchase needed maps, codify city ordinances in 1983, and still have the option of reallocating the remaining year VIII CDBG Funds when we identify a priority need that is eligible for funding under the CDBG program. If the council approves of my recommendation, the table below pre- sents the fund balances that would be available in each activity. CDBG FUNDS AVAILABLE: Diseased Housing Special Comp Plan Trees Rehab. Assess. Process $ 5,420. (#682) $45,103.(#586) 6,000. (#405) 32 , 000 . (# 5 76 ) $ 8,300.(#308) $ 8 , 000. (ma p ) 9,055. (Yr.8) 16,000.(Yr.8) 8,000.(Yr.8) 8 ,000. ( Ord . ) Total $20,475. $93,103. $16~300. $16,000.=$145,878. -- r ~ HENNEPIN e e OFFICE OF PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT C-2353 Government Center Minneapolis, Minnesota 55487 '..........'.~.. ('Oc:. '01" . ""\ .. ...' i%. .' ! ._~ . ~..~ c:.."'./ '+,. -:~o.~- ", (612) 348-6418 r~arch 3, 1982 Mr. Doug Uhrhammer City of Shorewood 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, Minnesota 55331 Re: Urban Hennepin County Year VIII/Eligibility Determination - Public Service Officer Dear Doug: Although the 1981 amendments to the Housing and Community Development Act provide greater flexibility in funding social service programs, it is still required that the service be shown to primarily benefit low and mod- erate income persons. Based on the low and moderate income benefit test it is the opinion of this office that using CDBG funds to support a public service officer posi- ti on wi thi n the South lake ~~i nnetonka Pub 1 i c Safety Department is not an eligible program activity. If you have additional questions please contact me at 348-5859. Sincerely, / i. '/7\ ---'~'('1.-.y__2:-~.t.-'-l' j~.it../" Larry /Bl ackstad Senior Planner lw HENNEPIN COUNTY an equal opportunity employer . . ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE REGULATION AND LICENSING OF MECHANICAL AND ELECTRONIC AMUSEMENT DEVICES IN THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD AND PROVIDING A PENALTY FOR VIOLATION THEREOF. The City Council of the City of Shorewood, Minnesota ordains: Section 1. DEFINITION. Mechanical or Electronic Amusement Devices. As used herein a mechanical or electronic amusement device is defined as a machine which, upon the insertion of a coin, token or slug, operates or may be operated for use as a game, contest or amusement of any description, or which may be used for any such game, contest or amusement and which contains no automatic pay-off device for the return of money coins, checks, tokens or merchandise or which provides for no such pay-off by any other means of manner. The term mechanical or electronic amusement devices shall include pin-ball machines, mechanical miniature pool tables, bowling machines, shuffleboards, electric rifle or gun ranges, miniature mechanical devices and games or amusements patterned after baseball, basketball, hockey, tennis, soccer and similar games which may be used solely for amusement and not as gambling devices. As used herein, a mechariical or electronic amusement device shall not be construed to mean coin operated music box, or what is commonly known as a jukebox. Section 2. LICENSE REQUIRED. It shall be unlawful for any person, firm or corporation to install, operate, or maintain any such mechanical or electronic amusement device without having first obtained a license therefore from the City. Section 3. LICENSE FEE. The fee for each ~echanical or electronic amusement device shall. be ~er mo~r $50.00 per year. ~ Section 4. APPLICATION. Application for a license shall be made to the City Clerk on forms supplied by him and shall include the following: 4.1 The 'name and address of the owner and applicant. 4.2 The name, number and description of the devices to be licensed. 4.3 The fee for play ing the dev ice and the pr i ze, if any. 4.4 A description of the premise upon which the device is kept. 4.5 What business is conducted at the premises. 4.6 The name of the manager thereof. 7 I t-~ e e .I Ill! :f?_ C} 1~; c)'" "sJ) l_(r'f.~,<;..-<j . ,,' ,\ C/~ 'Lv ,/C'" [I' (--C;'T:j (:::'J-VLA~ ':~ ? rr rd;~(..ht~) {-(~ j2C(J, /1 ../ r) )- (- -? J L (.1"'-( {,:../(C/'CY) C i1..-t-'t.J . J j I (-; . ./\ ( - t/~ l~-(j? <:f~ O/'-'l~ cl. -f "-f C'~;::<-/( (CA.,~~J.:-~7~) ~ ,. '7V \r4..~ P''?'--(Jtv:1; -<-A 2' C>'-t.-J 6'~J /~~~LJ C~ jZ" c,-,'Li' (~~n~~Z C"L<: G~~/' ~/~~~ e~J ~e- ~ C'~)C<." t',~~' 'T;^I"''::''''L-<.l!.-<-e '7-4...,<..: j/'7,./?'-e',?vr.-1!J , C,I> ~ (L ; G....~L{;' _ ~~f~ 7d ,/Zczf ~ ''I ~J(~e C;,,, "-1/<-<-.,'/1 u..,-</,-",-7a~ I:f) /'--:J 0": , "7l........:. " _/'J /^"t<-j-:.-Jj ~~-,(.,-{ '7A'l c~,uJ ,~ ~'/' ~/7-<_~. ,,~, .:1 ~'... I (... (,(../ Vf.C. c.; - / c:.-p" r::.) "-(:' , ,.' .1 (- //, '- /L'Uuv-:;7 ,/ t .:"1 ,./1 (J 1UC/~ ( 'j -- <-.. ) (>UL-.-z c. I c-!'/.> eJ -""), '-', . " (~l (_', CrY / 2. Y (I,. 1(1 .- /' L--tl (.. 'L'-''1---ti Vt.-V'L. J 5) J (:, i( (I l 2. -- 7 S" 0(") ~ .... . . ~q March 1,1982 To City of Shorewood Request for the awarding of the 1982 Road Side Noxious Weed Spraying Contract. Also We would like to handle the Weed Spraying for Badger,Manor,Cathcart and Griswold Fields and the Village Hall yard. The spraying will be handled the same as last year. A. We have all the spraying equipment needed to do the work properly. B. Licensed by the State of Minnesota. C. Fully insured. The price for Road Side spraying this year The price for Park spraying this year $1565.00 485.00 MAHONEY HOME SERVICES,INC. ~~.Y~ q