Loading...
042583 CC Reg AgP ~ CONTINUATION ~.;".. ':.~. ....-- . . ..7..-~,,,........_---- -- ........,...-~ '" ~ ~- OF BOARD OF REVIEW - 6:30 _.-- . . .... -~ ..--- - <q'" .-~.- '\ .~"""# . t: PM .....MONDAY - \ . fY1A'i q CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MONDAY, APRIL 25, 1983 COUNCIL CHAMBERS 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD SHOREWOOD, MN 7:30 PM AGE N D A CALL TO ORDER: A. Pledge of Allegiance and Prayer B. Roll Call Shaw Leonardo Stover Mayor Rascop Haugen Ij) 11' 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: A. Regular Council meeting - April 11, 1983 [Attachment #la] 2. CITIZEN'S FORUM: (Matters from the floor) A. B. 3. FINAL PLAT REVIEW - BAY PARK ADDITION/SIMPLE SUBDIVISION: Applicant: Mr. Ted Diekel Location: 27960 Smithtown Road [Attachment #3a] 4. REQUEST FOR VARIANCE: (Expansion of non-conforming structure) Applicant: Mr. Donald Wambold Location: 28015 Woodside Road [Attachment #4a] 5. PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT: A. B. 6. PARK COMMISSION REPORT: A. Approval of 1983 BMX Contract B. [Attachment #7a] / EEGULAR COUNCIL AGE~ AP.25, 1983 I ~." 7. ATTORNEY'S REPORT: A. B. 8. ENGINEER'S REPORT: A. 9. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT: A. Recommendation on Spring Clean-up Program [Attachment #9a] B. Review of Recommended Equipment and Manpower Sharing and Use Agreement [Attachment #9b] C. Financial Statement Review D. Meetings of Importance: 1) Zoning Ordinance Review - April 26 at 6:00 PM 2) Policy Setting Meeting - May 4 at 6:00 PM 10. MAYOR'S REPORT: A. I I. COUNCIL REPORT: A. 12. CITIZEN'S FORUM: A. 13. APPROVAL OF CLAIMS AND ADJOURNMENT: . , . , IJ. ,....'1'"' '.. .,: .....J,. ., , '.' .- '.. 'v'" ,-" .~'( ....1 "'~'''' ,........., ~ ." "!P. ;.., ",' ~1,..;.. . I ~""/ :~~~ - \ .,(.. ,. ,'" ." ", ,. >l.W"..Ito1 " . CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MONDAY, APRiL 11, 1983 COUNCIL CHAMBERS 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD SHOREWOOD, MN 7:30 PM MIi~UTES CALL TO ORDER The regular meeting of the Shorewood City Council was called to order by Mayor Rascop at 7:30 PM, Monday, April 11, 1983, in the Council Chambers. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE AND PRAYER The meeting opened with the Pledge of Allegiance and a prayer. ROLL CALL Present: Mayor Rascop, Councilmembers Haugen, Shaw, Leonardo, and Stover. Staff: Attorney Larson, Engineer Norton, Administrator Uhrhammer and Clerk Kennelly APPROVAL OF MINUTES Haugen moved, seconded by Shaw, to approve the minutes as amended for the Council meeting of March 28, 1983. Motion carried unanimously. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR Clean-up Day Residents asked the Council about when the City "Clean-up Day" will be and what is necessary to do in order to obtain a burning permit. Council will be deciding the time and fee schedule later. They explained some of the necessary steps for burning permit requests. ,. Complaint of Non-notification of Hearing Mr. and Mrs. Mike Marl' were present to voice a complaint in reference to receiving incorrect information as to the date that the Council would be making their decision on the Conditional Use Permit to allow the building of an office building at the Southwest corner of Chaska Road and State Highway #7. They were opposed to this construction and the removal of the nature buffer to Highway #7. Council apologized for the incorrect information they received from staff. Marr's requested to see all the plans for building, when they are submitted. Council will instruct the Building Inspector to notify Marr's when all the plans are received. -#-/~ e e REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING -2- APRIL 11, 1983 MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR continued Timber Lane Lake Access Steve Haskins from Timber Lane was present to thank the Council for it's efforts in writing a letter to the Governor's Task Force opposing the possible installation of a lake access on Timber Lane. PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT Shaw indicated that the matters the Planning Commission dealt with will be reviewed tonight with various other agenda items. He also recommended that a representative from the Planning Commission should be in attendance at the Council meetings in the future. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT Insurance Group Administrator Uhrhammer requested insurance coverage with the County Group Health Policy. One of the insurance companies involved did not want to accept the City at this time. Another review will be made in October. He felt we should also research the possibility of joining the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Group. "Clean-up Day" 1ge3 Budget did not contain enough money to subsidize tota Ily a spring clean-up. Administrator Uhrhammer will review and submit user-fee rates at the next meeting. PUBLIC HEARING - 8;00 PM RESOLUTION NO. 27-83 Dan Randall-24655 Smithtown Road Mr. Randall was present to request the to build a second home on his property Road. He would like to be allowed six present existing home. Public portion of this hearing was closed at 8;07 PM with no public comment. Council to allow him located at 24655 Smithtown (6) months to remove the Shaw moved, seconded by Stover, to allow the construction of this new home on the condition that the existing home be removed within 180 days of the issuance of the building permit. Motion passed unanimously by Roll Call vote. 5 ayes. MAYOR'S REPORT LMCD - Shorewood Yacht Club Permit The Public hearing was tabled in reference to the Shorewood Yacht Club dock license. e e REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING -3- APRIL 11, 1983 MAYOR'S REPORT - continued State Aid Formula The new State-aid formula will reduce Shorewood funding approximately $26,000.00 from last years amount if accepted at the current formula proposed. PUBLIC HEARING - 8:15 PM RESOLUTION NO. 28-83 Minnetonka State Bank-Sign Variance Request BobM~ Dougall from the Minnetonka. State Bank was present to request a square footage variance to allow them to install 3 signs containing one 81.5 square feet and two 18 square feet. City ordinance allows one sign of 150 square feet and two additional signs of 10 square feet. Mr. Mc Dougall is requesting to be allowed two 8 foot variances for the signs to be installed on the building. Public comment portion was closed at 8:28 PM after receiving comment from Bob Reutiman in approval of this request. Shaw moved, seconded by Stover,to approve the variance as requested. Motion carried 4 aye - 1 nay (Leonardo) (Haugen noted her decision was based on the Planning Commission recommendation) RESOLUTION NO. 29-83 PRELIMINARY PLAT REVIEW Oak Ridge Estates-3rd Addition Joe Gorecki submitted the proposal for Oak Ridge Estates 3rd Addition containing 8 new lots. He submitted some new changes as recommended and he feels they now have complied with all requirements. Engineer Norton reviewed various points that need to be clarified. 1.) Legal change of road names within the sub division. 2.) The need for additional soil borings. Mr Gorecki disagreed on the need, but the property owner, Mr. Noble, agreed to have further borings done as requested. Council questioned the water system issue. Central well versus individual well; Easements granted for utilities or lines installed now for future use. Engineer Norton estimated the cost of a Central well and lines a~ approximately $35,000.00, which would be the same as individual well. Developer disagreed with the central well because of the up front cost to him. Council discussed "Water Policy". Attorney Larson determined that there is no current policy in effect. . '/' e e REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING -4- APRIL 11, 1983 Oak Ridge Estates 3rd addition-Preliminary Plat Review continued Haugen moved, seconded by Leonardo, approval of the preliminary plat with the following conditions: 1. Additional soil borings to be done to Engineer's satisfaction. 2. Storm sewer and drainage constructed according to City Engineer's specifications. 3. Streets and sanitary sewer system to City Speci- fications. 4. Development agreement to be drawn up by City Attorney and signed. Motion carried unanimously by Roll Call vote. 5 ayes. Mr. Noble thanked the Council and Staff for their cooperation with his development. Council Break: for student interviews at 9:15 PM; returned at 9:30 PM. REVIEW OF AMENDMENT TO ZONING ORDINANCE Mortenson Property - 19545 & 19585 State Highway #7 Council reviewed the request to rezone this property from an R-l, Residential Zone, to a C-l, Commercial Zone. Mr. Hubbard, developer, presented plans for a II Self-Storage facility" for that location. This facility would have an on-site manager with a security system. Most of the storage buildings would be 11 feet in height with 2 buildings at 20 feet in height. Council had concerns about C-l zoning being the correct zone for that area, and whether it was the best use of the property. Haugen moved, seconded by Rascop, to refer this issue back to the Planner and Administrator for further review of the appropriate zoning for this area. Motion denied, 2 ayes, 3 nays (Shaw, Leonardo and Stover) ORDINANCE NO. 143 MOVING OF BUILDINGS The Council reviewed the 3rd reading of the proposed "Moving of Buildings" Ordinance. A few alterations were made in wording. Haugen moved, seconded by Leonardo, to adopt the proposed Ordinance as amended. Ordinance was adopted by roll call vote. 5 ayes. , t - _. e e REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING -5- APRIL 11, 1983 COUNCIL REPORT Public Hearing FOR Cable T.V. will be held at City Hall at 7:30 PM on Tuesday, April 12, 1983, for the purpose of receiving comments from the public on the "request for proposal". Special Meeting Stover requested the Council to set a special meeting for the purpose of reviewing and setting Water policy and consideration of any other needed policies. This meeting will be held on May 4th at 6:00 PM at City Hall. APPROVAL OF CLAIMS AND ADJOURNUiENT Haugen moved, seconded by Shaw, to approve claims for payment followed by adjournment at 11:05 PM. Motion carried unanimously. General Fund - [Account #00166] Liquor Fund - [Account #00174] Checks 26968 - 27044 = $94,266.42 Checks 9913 - 9953 = $24,315.49 Respectfully submitted, Mayor Sandra L. Kennelly, Clerk SLK: sn e CLAIMS PAID SINCE CHECK # 26968 26969 26g]0 26971 26g]2 26g]3 26g]4 26975 26g]6 26977 26978 26979 26980 26981 26982 26983 26984 26985 26986 26987 26988 26989 26990 26991 26992 26993 26994 26995 26996 26997 26998 26999 27000 27001 27002 27003 27004 27005 27006 27007 27008 27009 27010 27011 27012 27013 27014 27015 27016 27017 27019 27020 27021 TO WHOM PAID Mn D.C. Fund Municipal & Private Sere Mr. & Mrs. Edward Kazlauskas IIMC Conference Dennis Jormson PCA ~1n Elected Officials Conf. Mn Women in City Govrnt E.H. Renner & Sons Metro Waste Control City of Mound Key Leasing Inc. Central Life Grp. Ins. Mn. Benefit Ass'n. Colonial Ins. Co. City of Excelsior State Treasurer Commissioner of Revenue City of Tonka Bay Northwestern Bell Brad Nielsen Sandra Kennelly Roberta Dybvik State Treasurer Gary Larson City of Mound Evelyn Beck Roberta D-jbvik Dennis Jormson Sandra Kennelly Sue Niccum Brad Nielsen Bob Quaas Dan Randall Doug Uhrhammer Kathy West Don Zdrazil Minnetonka State Bank AFS~IE Mary Kennelly Robert Rascop Jan Haugen Al Leonardo Tad Shaw Kristi Stover Doug Uhrhammer Leroy Blackowiak State Treasurer Chaska Parts Ser. Hance hdwr. Jim Hatch Sales Co. Hopkins Parts Co. GENERAL !i'ljND . APRIL 1'!:" 1983 PURPOSE Roger Day-2nd qtr-82 $ animal patrol service assessmts. 32-117-23-31-0015 VOID conference-Sandy union-expenses to meeting certificate-wastewater operator dinner & conf. dues-haugen & Stover Amesbury-Project #82-1 Sewer sere chgs.-Mar. 1st qtr. fire contract April lease-copier April premo April Premo April life & accident premo 2nd qtr. fire contract soc sec Iv1arch SWH taxes meter usage-water telephone service mileage and conf. clerk conf. mileage errand mileage PERA attorney fees 2nd qtr. fire contract salary " " " " " " " " " " FWH taxes April union dues cleaning mayor's salary council salary " " " " 11 " total expenses 1-1 thru 4-15 #2 truck-body repair PERA shop supplies & equip. parts shop supplies equip. parts-sweeper parts AMOUNT 795.00 445.63 108.15 -0- 185.00 11.46 15.00 50.00 30.00 10,312.25 15,776.31 667.01 223.30 1,427.94 7.00 119. 50 8,011.25 3,418.10 1,731.00 601.74 719.58 78.76 45.10 15.00 1,036.18 4,728.40 667.02 538.01 379.24 506.71 490.62 316.28 593.06 619.83 497.40 705.71 326.53 601.46 1,047.70 47.80 12.25 150.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 160.93 80.00 846.93 148.27 4.70 415.14 151.91 CHECK # 27022 27023 27024 27025 27026 27027 27028 27029 27030 27031 27032 27033 27034 27035 27036 27037 27038 27039 27040 27041 27042 27043 27044 APRIL 11, 19 3 TO WHOr~ PAID e GENERAL FUND -_page 2 PURPOSE e Hydraulic Component Ser. Hydrotex League Mn. Cities Henn. co. Leef Bros Midwest Motor & Equip. Sales Midwest Asphalt Corp. Minnegasco Northern States Power Sun News Shwd. Horse owners Assoc. Shwd. Tree Ser. SThlPSD Tonka Auto Body Warners R2E of America Water Prod. Co. Zep Mfg. Co. Coffee System Mr. Chips Stump Removal Mn Dept. of Health Northwestern Nat'l. Ek. equipment parts lubrication-equipment 10 yr. plan bldg share-lMC bldg. jan-feb-mar B&R prisoners laundry sere equipment parts asphalt fuel-Amesbury electricity public hearing notices permits haul dutch elm reserve banquet parts planner equip-shop supplies equip-city hall water supplies shop supplies coffee stump removal VOID water supply class C cert-Quaas bond payments AMOUNT 192.95 1,538.48 332.00 4,010.25 189.40 312.51 222.99 41.04 753.96 45.60 8.00 322.25 225.00 7.98 21.73 899.00 653.68 41.44 48.00 602 . 00 -0- 15.00 23,517.00 $ 94,266.42 .. '" CIAIMS PAID SINCE TO vlliCM PAID CHEC'K # 9913 9914 9915 9916 9917 9918 9919 9920 9921 9922 9923 9924 9925 9926 9927 9928 9929 9930 9931 9932 9933 9934 9935 9936 9937 9938 9939 9940 9941 9942 9943 9944 9945 9946 9947 9948 9949 9950 9951 9952 9953 e Griggs Cooper Central Life Grp. Ins. Ivln. Benefit Assoc. Ryan Properties Harry Niemela Johnson Bros. Liquor Co. Twin City Wine Co. Ed Phillips & Sons Co. Quali ty Wine Co. Old Peoria Co. I~dvlest Wine Co. P Q & C Automation I~ter-Weisman Co. State Treasurer Corrmissioner of Revenue State Treasurer Johnson Bros Johnson Bros Griggs-Cooper Prior Wine Co. Old Peoria Co. Harry Feightinger Russell Marron Don 'I'harlson Sue Culver Stephen Theis Pat Amundson Pat Pfeffer Steven Schultz IfJary Skraba Dean Young llinnetonka State Bank Quali ty Wine Co. Mal'k VII Sales A. J. Ogle Co. Pepsi Cola Coca Cola Alarm Services Dept NSP Minnegasco State Treasurer LIQUOR FUND ~RIL 11, 1983 PURPOSE liquor April prer.1. Feightinger-April prem April rent April rent Wine wine wine wine liquor wine misc. ice purchases misc. purchases salaries- soc sec svm taxes PERA wine wine liquor wine liquor salary " " " 11 " " " " 11 II wine beer-March beer-March misc purchases misc purchases-pop burglar alarm service electricity fuel ser. PERA AMOUNT 2,329.06 414.99 10.85 2,540.83 882.50 1,376.42 579.61 550.05 622 .66 854.25 696.91 20.00 779.41 686.31 511.00 395.35 824.30 701.97 2,097.87 147.80 629.72 581.32 407.70 145.72 87.50 249.72 46 . 20 99 .10 142.00 115.50 311.92 329.50 377 . 70 1,243.37 976.86 230.75 365.04 224.68 194.07 152.04 382.94 $ 24,315.49 e e CITY OF SHOREWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING TUESDAY, APRIL 19, 1983 COUNCIL CHAMBERS 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD 7:30 P.M. M I NUT E S CALL TO ORDER Acting Chairman Shaw called the April 19th Planning Comission meeting to order at 7:43 P.M. ROLL CALL: Present: Commissioners Richard Spellman (late) ,Mary Boyd, Bob Shaw, Frank Reese, Vern Watten, Janet Leslie; Council Liaison Tad Shaw; City Planner Brad Nielsen; Assistant Kathy West. Absent: Commission Chairman Bruce Benson (out of town). (The following text is an unapproved portion of the April 19th Minutes.) REQUEST FOR SETBACK VARIANCE Mr. and Mrs. Donald Wambold were present to request a variance to allow them to remodel an existing house located at 28015 Woodside Road. The house was described as a nonconforming structure. The Wambolds noted that the house was built prior to adoption of the setback requirements in the current Zoning Ordinance. Letters from the Wambolds and their realtors were referenced to cite the inadequacies of the house and its unsaleability (see Planners report dated 17 April 1983, attach- ment #2). Mrs. Wambold explained that they planned to extend the house 23 feet to the west, adding bedrooms and an entry (requiring a setback variance of 30.5 to 35 feet) and additions of a kitchen, deck and gazebo to the east and south (requiring a 10 to 14 foot variance). Mr. Wambold noted that placement of the additions is limited due to the location of the existing pool and trees. Commissioners Reese and Leslie noted a valid hardship. additions would not negatively impact the neighborhood Watten noted that the saleability of the house was not address. They commented that the or green space. Commissioner an item for the Commission to It was noted that the structure is nonconforming and the additions would expand the nonconformity. Joe Gorecki, 26890 Edgewood Road, felt that the additions to the home would improve the area and would harmonize with the neighborhood. .The Commission questioned whether other homes in the area meet the setback require- ments. It was noted that some do, others do not. Watten moved, Leslie seconded, to recommend that the Council approve the request for variances. The motion carried unanimously, 6-0. e e MAYOR Robert Raseop COUNCIL Jan Haugen Tad Shaw Alexander Leonardo Robert Gagne ADMINISTRATOR Doug Uhrhammer CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD . SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 . (612) 474-3236 MEMORANDUM TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: BRAD NIELSEN DATE: APRIL 22, 1983 RE: BAY PARK ADDITION - FINAL PLAT FILE NO: 405 (83.09) Mr. Theodore Deikel has submitted a final plat for the Bay Park Addition. As you recall the preliminary plat involved a lot width variance, allowing a 50 foot strip along the northerly side of the property to serve as access to the northernmost parcel which contains an existing house. City approval of the variance and preliminary plat was contingent upon five specific conditions (see Council minutes dated August 9, 1982). The final plat is consistent with the approved preliminary plat. It should be noted that Lot 2 is just over 150 feet wide along the lake. Drainage and utility easements along property lines have been provided as per City requirements. However the City Engineer has noted that the easements for existing utilities have not been shown. These should be included on the final plat. Three of the Council's requirements relate to future division of the large southerly parcel. These items should be addressed in a development agree- ment between the City and develoner. The City Attorney is currently pre- paringusaid development agreement. While it is assumed that Outlot A will be ow.ned by the owner of Lot 2, this should be specified in the development agreement. The agreement should also clearly specify that future owners should be aware that Outlot A is intended for future use as a public street. cc: Doug Uhrhammer Jim Norton Gary Larson Ted Deikel A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore -1r6fA e e e e MAYOR Robert Raseep COUNCIL Jan Haugen Tad Shew Alexander Leonardo Robert Gagne ADMINISTRATOR Doug Uhrhammer CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD . SHOREWOOD. MINNESOTA 55331 . (612) 474-3236 MEMORANDUM TO: Planning Commission, Mayor and City Council FROM: Brad Nielsen DATE: 17 April 1983 RE: Wambold, Donald - Variance Request FILE NO.: 405 (83.07) Attached is a request from Mr. and Mrs. Donald Wambold to expand their exist- ing house at 28015 Woodside Road (see Exhibit A, attached). The house is cur- rently nonconforming due to inadequate setback on the east side (see Exhibit B, attached). Since Section 10 of the existing Zoning Ordinance specifically pro- hibits the expansion of nonconforming structures, the Wambo1ds have requested a variance. Their request is expressed in detail in the attached letter, dated 11 April, from them to the Council and Planning Commission (see attachments 0-1, 0-2 and 0-3). Their problem stems from a number of factors. First, their lot contains only 21,000 square feet in an R-1 District, which requires 40,000 square feet. Secondly, they have a corner lot which requires larger side yard setbacks abutting the street. Finally, the Zoning Ordinance has changed, more specifi- cally defining where certain setbacks are required. This problem is high- lighted when comparing the required setbacks shown on Exhibit B with the way the lot was originally 1ayed out on Exhibit C. As can be seen, the property (with the exception of the pool area) would conform if the north side were considered the front. Unfortunately, variances are still required to allow the proposed expansions, regardless of what is considered front or side. As in the past, we suggest that the City review the proposed Zoning Ordinance Revision currently under study by the City Council. Although the new ordi- nance allows more flexibility than the existing, in that nonconforming structures are a1lowd to expand as long as the nonconformity is not increased, this offers little relief to the applicants. As proposed, both the garage addition and the kitchen/deck/gazebo addition will increase the nonconformity of the house. A Residentia' Community on. Lake Minnetonka's South $hOffl * J!V e Shorewood Planning Commission, Mayor and City Council 17 April 1983 e Page Two It is suggested that the Planning Commission, in making its recommendation to the Council, review Section 6, Subd. 2 of the Shorewood Zoning Ordinance relative to variances. BJN:kw cc: Doug Uhrhammer Jim Norton Gary Larson Donald Wambold Kathy West . 'I ~\rl e tf; ~ .. 0 ISl'.IS":. o..cI ,.. '~II.\' C'h.;..' SURVE.' ~i) E{G,) << . ,.IN ..1 , ' I -! 250 ... .0. =' 1C.1 .-:;'e //' ((<t) Lor 4 ~(/a. ~ 5" '" ~ I~ '$ I .. I: Zoc> ' ....... ...... 211" ~ Exhibit A SITE LOCATION Wambold Variance Request @) e e_, , ~l oJ "o( ~ j.1 " t~"'" Exhibit B PROPOSED SITE PLAN SETBACKS PER ORDINANCE () ~ ,. ..~e '" ~D ~.='If ~ c. .W:tt. "."-:; :~. ~I .s WJ , ::;0' ~ ct:N'lE / ~-~.. .....~,... .r p1!" p .' , ~ .' e ,...o.'!. I ~JOf. .~1I..i4 A ~'T~1} 't\." 1 . 4 I ',: ~ I I , ~co =t~ . ..- - 2.. ~:... 30... e><r-..;r. ! AI:I..... ; J ~ '''I: '- E"Jo./S' ez."L cc-=' ~~,~ _ W' -:.~.~ iO'Fb1-f .~ '" N r ... ~I.,,- r.... =..:." -' . ~ . ... ... . ~ "'to."':. I .\ I I '~ If)' 610& .. .,; )... ........... -"""t,. " .~ "I " " l~'Z: ~ '-'to # I ,e ,. ~1 A .,.="~, 1/:.' ~ y/ " . /t~/ I' -~:.... ~ /..// r / · )~. -~. .~ ~ c' L~'er_/Jt /.=:?,) .J .5t> ' ReAR " .. t-.: ,. ___c::rr r:!. ~. '!.I,. ~ .#..J\..IC&> '""'~ e ~J .J "., ~ J.1 II '::: V '. '. , t ~11:1"* Exhibit C PROPOSED SITE PLAN SETBACKS PER LAYOUT e /" 30.'" ~.!CI~ .~ -' ~'~';'I!:'~ ex . ~ &.0 :&,... - .", ":~. c-v :jO' 6\c:;L' (~TTIN~ A -6~T ~~~ r...... j: i 't t::. , .....;' . , . ..... .... . _..t:. I I I , - ..; )... '\..&... '--"~. .. .j ~ If ~ ,-: :... ,~ ": \u :It.D "'.::E sa:. C. ~I WI l"O.~ 50'~ .i.S I r~ ... ~. I ~:; 'of. I ........, CC"'IE I .A1tJf11Y ~ ~ .... ...... '." . lieY'~' ....... i I " '-'L ~ --, -1 I I. 50' ~ ; I l~ .:::" , i III '-.-'Z ~ e e . I I peT , I''::'' ,. ---1 I 1 ..,....1 (, ~-' . . . - .~ y N _ ",--,..,,' L-c:::tT'. ... --- -. ,~ o#.J~Z> ....'fC;. e e 11 AprH 1983 Mayor City Council Planning Commision. Shorewood, MN Attached are the drawings for the proposed addition for our home at 28015 Woodside Road. We purchased the home in May of 1977 when we moved from Florida. We had no indication at the time of purchase that the lot was considered sub standard, nor that existing structure(s) were in violation of local set-back laws. The planned addition is for the purpose of making our home more useable for ourselves as well as making it saleable in the future. You will note the date of the plan is 1981. My husband was transferred to Indiana in 1979. We put our home up for sale in August of 1979 for $125,000. The real estate market was a sellers market at that time and we were assured by our brokers the house should sell quite rapidly for that figure. We had our home on the market for 12 months until August of 1980, when we finally gave up trying. We had lowered the price several times after buying a home in Indianapolis. We sold the home in Indianapolis two months after putting it on the market. My husband quit the company he was working for there and returned to Minneapolis. We again tried to sell the house in 1981 as we wanted to move on the lake and needed larger bedrooms and kitchen. This time the house was on the market six months before we again gave up. Both times the house was on the market, we had excellent showings. During the first month each time we averaged over 5 showings a week. During discussions with the brokers, they advised us of the reasons people were not interested in the house. 1) Bedrooms were too small (we can't have a dresser in the bedroom because of the size). 2) Kitchen was too small and dark (there are only 3 recessed lights in the kitchen and one small window). 3) No eating area in the kitchen (there's not even room for a chair). 4) No front entrance to the house. 5) The side and front yards are unusable (steep incline on the side, woods in the front) and the back yard is too small and hilly. 6) No storage in garage. D-t e e -2- We decided if we were to stay in the house, we had the same complaints. If we ever expected to get a reasonable return on our investment, we would have to correct its shortcomings. We went to an architect at Lyman Lumber, and asked him to come out and see the property and draw up plans which would cor- rect the defects. He drew up the plans understanding the limitations of the lot (steep, hilly inclines which wash out during heavy rains). During the past two years, we have been dealing with builders and rising interest rates, trying to pick a time to start when costs would not be pro- hibitive. We have selected the builder and the bank has agreed to the loan at a rate which we could afford. When we came to the City for a building permit we found that in order to make the improvements required in order for our property to be worth what it is currently being appraised, we must obtain a variance to extend beyond the set back restrictions. You will note from the drawing the existing house is 50+ feet from the lot line on the North and West sides (although the pool and fence erected by the previous owner is less than 10 feet on the West). The existing house is approximately 33 feet from the East lot line. For our proposed remodeling, we are requesting a 30.5-35 feet set back on the West and an additional ten to fourteen feet on the East. The neighbors adjacent to our property on the East and the South have agreed with our plans as they will enhance the property and their view of it. We request that you grant this variance to allow us to make our home not only more livable for ourselves, but also to allow us a reasonable return on our investment should we be required to sell in the future. -. . \ r~n \.~\..v.-~~ 4( 1\ \ ~\.V~~vv ll~u~~ ~ Donald and Marilyn WambolJ 28015 Woodside Road Shorewood, MN D-2- .,~ e e STREETER A 17809 HUTCHINS DRIVE, MINNETONKA, MINNESOTA 55343, PHONE (812) 474.5291 ~DRlTS REALTORS April 11, 1983 To Whom It May Concern: In reference to the property located at 28015 Woodside Road, Shorewood, Minnesota, wel'have had a long history of marketing the subject property with our company. One listing period was 12 months and the second for 6 months. Extensive efferts were matle to sell the property with no offers being tendered. The primary reason in our experience in showing the prop- erty and also receiving comments from other Multiple List- ing companies showing the property are the following. Inadequate size of bedrooms No true front entry inadequate kitchen size No space for entertaining guests Our opinion is that the subject property could be made marketable with an expansion of the existing home to correct tbe.existing functional ob1s01esencet. Respectfully submitted, 4~~ Fred Kellog9,CRS.1' .il~iFl-- ~.i!~ Bette Syverson,CRS Streeter-Andrus, Inc.REALTORS. REAL ESTATE IN THE LAKE MINNETONKA AND WEST SUBURBAN AREA RESIDENTIAL . COMMERCIAL . APPRAISALS . LAND DEVELOPMENT O~3 e e @ lei Americas Inc. . TO: (!L~ /~....~c-~ DATE: FROM: ,~~'i( ~<~"Cc'rI 6_>7 y ~-V'?C"t.'1' e .v~/8=. 4z:",/"~'h 7 ~n V ,A" tfj".; ;!!2{(, cu-",<<""/ iL h/<h<U;') Cd" cf, L/ ~ /" (, )"",.. 6<,<4}t, y{, d/'5d W-ILUN"/ ~c~(' (-t.~v/(t,u ;::4(C)' '/Z'{) //I~J~V /~ r ~'-} /;/r;<u /C".j/ L,/ /""- y.""~ ,,6' ;/AUL I~Y Aa<<"-- 7' /~( /9.1$ A7-""/<"W ~~dU ~ ~ ..>(~~~~--,-.( Am 129 Rev. 7ne MEMORANDUM #IV ( ( ( '4 AN~L BMX MEMORANDUM AGREEME~ n THIS MEMORANDUM AGREEMENT, made and e~tered into this 7 - day of ~/l~ , 198~, by and between the Shorewood BMX Associa- tion hereinafter called "Athletic Association", and the City of Shore- wood, Oa Minnesota Municipal Corporation, hereinafter called "City": 1. The City agrees to provide to the Athletic Association the exclusive use of the BMX bicycle track located at Freeman Park city facilities for those dates and times which the Athletic Association does agree to file with the City Admini- strator on or before 7 days following the execution of this agreement, provided said dates are specifically approved by the City Council at its regularly scheduled meeting follow- ing the filing of the same. The City Council shall have the right to amend or change the dates and times of authorized use as they deem to be in the best use of the City; dates so approved shall not be subject to change without prior approval of the City Administrator. Postponements may be made up on substitute dates only after approval of such dates and times have been obtained from the City Administrator. 2. The Athletic Association shall be solely responsible for main- taining the track itself in a usable condition. It shall also be responsible for all parking of spectator cars in designated areas and for proper crowd control. 3. The Athletic Association agrees that no participant of any of its sponsored events will be permitted to use the track unless that participant is protected with a hard protective helmet and pads completely covering the handle bars and frame of the bi- cycle used on the track. The Association agrees to post this regulation in a conspicuous place so that anyone attempting to use the track during a period other than for sponsored events will be informed of the minimum safety equipment required for use of same. 4. The Athletic Association represents to the City that they are operating the track on a non-profit basis and that all funds charged for entry fees will be used by the Association for costs, upkeep, and maintenance of the track and for prizes for participants. 5. The Athletic Association agrees, before any use of the BMX track is made, it shall file a copy of a liability insurance policy naming the City as insured in the amount of $100,0001 $300,000. An explanation will also be included explaining additional insurance coverage on race participants. .Use of City's facilities shall not be permitted until these policies are on file. e e BMX MEMO AGREEMENT - 2 - 6. This agreement shall be in existence for the balance of 198~ subject to its being revoked on 10 days notice. In case of- excess vandalism, or lack of control of spectators, or the Association violates any terms of this contract, the City shall be entitled to revoke use of the track by the Athletic Association. The Association shall have an opportunity to be heard before the City Council if they so desire during the 10 day notice period. 7. Any use of the facility other than that authorized herein shall result in an immediate forfeiture in further rights of the Athletic Association to use the same. CITY OF SHOREWOOD By ~~ .J} Jf,~ L, C;//7/~ By By ee BKANCa INTERNATIDNAL. LTD. N! anonrwUQU III'IA *"_ NAMED INSURED AND ADDRUS r- AMERICAN BICYCLE ASSOCIATION P.O. BOX 718 CHANDlER, ARIZONA 85224 r .ROKER NAME AND ADDRESS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE II ABA ,.... .. .. c....,. 'hi' poliCI" '" ... .... 01 STEVEN G. BRABEC INSURANC[ 920 N. ARIZONA AVENUE, SUITE 8 CHANDlER, ARIZONA 852~,. (602) 963-5433 .' L L .. i.lorc. at IlW eM,. hereof. a. follow.: Sch.dule A: Nee day. only; excl,ud.. partleifenu _SCRIPTION 0' INSURANCE IUND o~ ursUll'A'NCE ItOLICY NUMn.. ItOL.ICY ItE..IOD l.1'!lIT. 0," LIA.ILI.T., ~DIl. Y IN.lURY .....E..TY DAMAGE ~at LI.''''Y IH. 3/1/83 . .ODD Ie" ...__ . .000 Each OCCurNftCe o Co",preMftll... I.... 3/1/84 ~ .ODD 18Cb OCCurNftCe . .000 A_epte t o Manu'act",.,,' ana . ,000 ..... t Contracto,. L.aOlllt" GlS 001143 [2!1 Own."', unalo,..' OR ana Tenants Llaollit" o OWMn' ana Cont,tcton' "'ottch... wa.lIlt" [J Comtet.a Operatl_ S 500 .ODD ColIlbinect Si.... Llmi. ana oawcts LiaDlllt" o Contract.,.. LiaOlllt" AUTOMOBILE LIABILITV o Ownacl Automobile. EH. S ,000 Eeh '**'" . .000 Eeh accident o Hlfacl Automobile. Eap. S ,000 Eac" acc.cIaftI o No~Ownacl Au'omobi I.. OTHER: Ett. addtl in.ur td: City of Short! EIIP. wood. MN .. Cargo EH. lap. lie" lCei" . Auto PhySIcal Damage o Fir. .. T..ft lit. L illlit: Deductible: o C.A.C. lap. LIIII.t: Deductible: o Comprattensive L im.t: Deduc.ible: o Collllion Limit: Deduc'lble: o..cr.ptlon Ve. Body Type Mfr. Colt ot Vehicl. Ma.. Ser. PurelWI. Oat. , .' aDDllc..,. In the .vent of cancellation of said policies or a reduction in the limits of liability. the company will andtavor to give wrintn notice to the pvty to whom this certificate is issued, but failur. to give notice shall impose no obligation or liability upon the company. Thi, certificate of insurance neither affirmatively nor naptiv.ly amends. ..ttnds or alter, the cover... afforded by any pOlicy described her.in. ~ANY: SCOTTSDAlE INSURANCE ClJ1PANY (. member of TtE NATlONUDE GROUP) r l L .J 0""10 T INTlIINATIOlIAL; LTD. l ~~c- f 1 NAill AND ADDAIII Shorewood IMX Gary Carl S4S5 Teal Circle Shorewood, .. SS331 3-09-8' SIL.I'17.71) e ..,) :g.~~~~~~~~~ '1':l~~'~i~' i ~ ~"'- '- '~ ~ :.: .~ ~ ~;: 1 ~{{ t ~i .t ~ ~ "-... ~ ~ · , ? ':) ':) 0 ~ ~ t :...~. ~.'\ l j f.t ~ ~ ,'( ~ i ~ ~. ~ ~ ~ if. ~ ~ ~ 1 . n\ '\ ~ 1 ~.~. ~ " 1 ~ { ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .t ~. -t t" 'i ~ ~. ~ >I: ~. ~ ~ J ~ 1~~~~~.~~~~~~~~~~'1~~~ ~ ~~,,", '- , , "' '- l'( ~ , l .) ~.:-J ~:t ~ ( t ~ '\ ~ ~ ~ ~ {.. ~. J " j ~ .i 'f ~ ' ~ !}l ; ~ "{l "" ~ ~ ~ ~ q ;{ ~ ~ '( ~ ~ ~ 1J ~ ~ 11l ~ ~) t ~ ~~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ j j' ~ ~ ~ ~ f ~ J ~ S 't' f ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t }'n ..~ f 1 " '. . ~ I {) ~ 1 ~~, ~ j ~ t ~1'i~~~~4~~l4 . . 1~~~\4'r~~ "'" ~ - . - """ "tl . ~ .. ! ~ ~ ~ ~ e e TO: FROM: DATE: RE: e e MAYOR Robert Rascap COUNCIL Jan Haugen Tad Shaw Alexander Laonardo Robert Gagne ADMINISTRATOR Doug Uhrhemmer CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD . SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 . (612) 474-3236 City Council Members Doug Uhrhammer April 13, 1983 "Spring Clean-up" This years Spring Clean-up program is planned for the~ weekend in May (21st and 22nd). Deephaven's program is scheduled for the first weekend in May. Excelsior's program will take place on the second weekend of May. I recommend that we charge residents the following amounts for dumping: $ 2.00 3.00 4.00 6.00 3.00/cubic yd. 10.00/appliance -Car Trunk -Station wagon -Van -Pickup and 2 wheel trailer -All others -Appliances (Stoves, Refrigerators, Water Heaters, etc.) Senior Citizens should be allowed to dump at ! the stated rate. And, as last year, all dumpers should be required to present identification to prove residing in Shorewood. Hours will be 8:00 AM to 5:00 PM. A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore -t:I-qa- e e EQUIPMENT AND MANPOWER SHARING AND USE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITIES OF SHOREWOOD AND TONKA BAY WHEREAS, the Cities of Shorewood and Tonka Bay, hereinafter referred to as Shorewood and Tonka Bay, desire to enter into a mutual aid agreement recognizing the close relationship that exists between the Cities, and WHEREAS, Shorewood and Tonka Bay recognize the financial advantages afforded to both communities through a mutual aid and sharing of equipment and manpower arrangement, and WHEREAS, it is important to formalize the relationship of the two communities with the sharing of the equipment and manpower to assure the residents of each community that each community is receiving equal benefits from the sharing. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of approves the agreement and administrative procedures concerning the sharing of equipment and manpower between the Cities as set forth and attached hereto and directs its Administrator and Public Works Director to implement the policy agreement commencing on June 1, 1983. CITY OF SHOREWOOD CITY OF TONKA BAY Mayor Mayor Administrator Administrator ~qb DATE e e . EXHIBIT A E QUI P MEN T USE R E COR D FROM TONKA BAY: TO TONKA BAY: NAMES OF MEN NO. OF AND EQUIPMENT HOURS RATE-RENT AND DEPRECIATION DATE NAMES OF MEN AND EQUIPMENT " II II II II " " II " II II II " II " " II " " II " " II II II NO. OF HOURS RATE-RENT & DEPRECIATION I , 10 yard 6 yard 3 yard Vibratory - 198 3 RAT E S I EQUIPMENT I Tandem d\Jnp tl"UCit 1 Single axle dlInp truck 1 Single axle dlInp truck - 1 Tal I Black top roller 1 920 Cat 4WD Loader 1 tot:>bil Street SWeeper I Portable Air Canpressor I Back Hoe I Road Grader I Water Truck I Tractor with Flail tebier I Tractor with sicklle roower 1 Tractor with Rotary roower I Jet Sewer Cleaner I 1 Ton Truck with Hoist I Pull Type Paver 1 I I 1 I I 1 I 1 I I 1 1 I 1 I 1 I I I _ EXHIBIT B 1 RENTAL RATE IDEPRECIATION RAT I $ 17.00 hr. 9.81 hr. 9.81 hr. 7.50 hr. 25.30 hr. 30.00 hr. 6.75 hr. 16.40 hr. 17.00 hr. 10.00 hr. 10.20 hr. 5.00 hr. 5.00 hr. 16.00 hr. 10.00 hr. 12.00 hr. I I I 1 I 1 1 . 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 I I I I I I $ 5.00 hr. 1 2.40 hr. 1 2.40 hr. I 3.60 hr. 1 10.00 hr. I 4.50 hr. I 4.50 hr. 1 4.00 hr. 1 3.00 hr. I 2.40 hr. .1 .80 hr. I 2.00 hr. I 2.00 hr. I 2.50 hr. 1 2.00 hr. I 2.00 hr. I I I 1 I 1 1 1 I I I 1 I I I 1 I I I I . , ADMINISTRATIV~OLICY ON THE SHARING OF ptltIC WORKS EQUIPMENT AND MANPOWER BETWEEN .THE CITIES OF SHOREWOOD AND TONKA BAY PROCEDURE 1. RECORD KEEPING: Each Community will keep a record of the equipment and manpower loaned to and borrowed from the other community on their equipment use record form. [see Exhibit A] 2. PAYMENT OWED: Once each quarter the Administrator's of Tonka Bay and Shorewood will meet to compare the equipment use records kept by each city; determine if differences exist on records, and calculate the amount of money owed to the other city, if any. If money is owed, it will be paid within 30 days of the quarterly meeting date. 3. EQUIPMENT RENTAL RATES: [see Exhibit B for rates] In May of each year the Public Works Directors and City Administrators of each city will meet to compare the Existing Equipment Usage Rate with the Equipment Usage Rate charged by Hennepin County. If the cities rates are different than those charged by Hennepin County, the cities rates will be changed so that they equal the county's rate. In all cases the usage rates charged for equipment will be equal to the rate Hennepin County charges for a similar piece of equipment. 4. MANPOWER RATES: Man hours will be charged on the basis of an actual hourly Loaded Labor Rate per man - the Loaded Labor Rate charge will be calculated as follows: Annual salary + Annual Group Insurance Cost + Annual PERA @ 6.7% of total salary + Annual Workmans Compen- sation @ 6.8% of total salary ~ 2080 hours = Loaded Labor Rate per hour. Annual salary + Annual Group Insurance Cost + Annual PERA at 5.5% of total salary + Annual FICA at 6.7% of total salary + Annual Workman's Compensation at 6.8% of total salary ~ 2080 hours = Loaded Labor Rate per hour. CITY OF SHOREWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING TUESDAY, APRIL 19, 1983 COUNCIL CHAMBERS 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD 7:30 P.M. M I NUT E S CALL TO ORDER Acting Chairman Shaw called the April 19th Planning Comission meeting to order at 7:43 P.M. ROLL CALL: Present: Commissioners Richard Spellman (late), Mary Boyd, Bob Shaw, Frank Reese, Vern Watten, Janet Leslie; Council Liaison Tad Shaw; City Planner Brad Nielsen; Assistant Kathy West. Absent: Commission Chairman Bruce Benson (out of town). (The following text is an unapproved portion of the April 19th Minutes.) REQUEST FOR SETBACK VARIANCE Mr. and Mrs. Donald Wambold were present to request a variance to allow them to remodel an existing house located at 28015 Woodside Road. The house was described as a nonconforming structure. The Wambolds noted that the house was built prior to adoption of the setback requirements in the current Zoning Ordinance. Letters from the Wambolds and their realtors were referenced to cite the inadequacies of the house and its unsaleability (see Planners report dated 17 April 1983, attach- ment #2). Mrs. Wambold explained that they planned to extend the house 23 feet to the west, adding bedrooms and an entry (requiring a setback variance of 30.5 to 35 feet) and additions of a kitchen, deck and gazebo to the east and south (requiring a 10 to 14 foot variance). Mr. Wambold noted that placement of the additions is limited due to the location of the existing pool and trees. Commissioners Reese and Leslie noted a valid hardship. They commented that the additions would not negatively impact the neighborhood or green space. Commissioner Watten noted that the saleability of the house was not an item for the Commission to address. It was noted that the structure is nonconforming and the additions would expand the nonconformity. Joe Gorecki, 26890 Edgewood Road, felt that the additions to the home would improve the area and would harmonize with the neighborhood. .The Commission questioned whether other homes in the area meet the setback require- ments. It was noted that some do, others do not. Watten moved, Leslie seconded, to recommend that the Council approve the request for variances. The motion carried unanimously, 6-0. '. '" e e MAYOR Robert Rascap COUNCIL Jan Haugen Ted Shaw Alexander Leonardo Robert Gagne ADMINISTRATOR Doug Uhrhemmer CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD . SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 . (612) 474-3236 MEMORANDUM TO: Planning Commission, Mayor and City Council FROM: Brad Nielsen DATE: 17 April 1983 RE: Wambold, Donald - Variance Request FILE NO.: 405 (83.07) Attached is a request from Mr. and Mrs. Donald Wambold to expand their exist- ing house at 28015 Woodside Road (see Exhibit A, attached). The house is cur- rently nonconforming due to inadequate setback on the east side (see Exhibit B, attached). Since Section 10 of the existing Zoning Ordinance specifically pro- hibits the expansion of nonconforming structures, the Wambolds have requested a variance. Their request is expressed in detail in the attached letter, dated 11 April, from them to the Council and Planning Commission (see attachments D-1, D-2 and D-3). Their problem stems from a number of factors. First, their lot contains only 21,000 square feet in an R-1 District, which requires 40,000 square feet. Secondly, they have a corner lot which requires larger side yard setbacks abutting the street. Finally, the Zoning Ordinance has changed, more specifi- cally defining where certain setbacks are required. This problem is high- lighted when comparing the required setbacks shown on Exhibit B with the way the lot was originally layed out on Exhibit C. As can be seen, the property (with the exception of the pool area) would conform if the north side were considered the front. Unfortunately, variances are still required to allow the proposed expansions, regardless of what is considered front or side. As in the past, we suggest that the City review the proposed Zoning Ordinance Revision currently under study by the City Council. Although the new ordi- nance allows more flexibility than the existing, in that nonconforming structures are allowd to expand as long as the nonconformity is not increased, this offers little relief to the applicants. As proposed, both the garage addition and the kitchen/deck/gazebo addition will increase the nonconformity of the house. A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore ~~ " e Shorewood Planning Commission, Mayor and City Council 17 April 1983 e Page Two It is suggested that the Planning Commission, in making its recommendation to the Council, review Section 6, Subd. 2 of the Shorewood Zoning Ordinance relative to variances. BJN:kw cc: Doug Uhrhammer Jim Norton Gary Larson Donald Wambold Kathy West '. ~\rl e r~ .a .' . 'SI..IS":. 0.... T I~I'.\' i:h.;,.' SURVE.' ~i) E.(t,) , .,.... f ' " ,1 , t "I ~ 2$0 ,.. {. o '"1 . o .... o '~.' //' (f <f) Lor 4 At/a, 5 ... ,.. ~ C\I t~'1"H ,"=%00' '2~7 06 ".5 .. . . . ...... 211D ~ Exhibit A S lTE LOCATION Wambold Variance Request @) e _.. " ... oJ 'i1 J.! '- " t~ Exhibit B PROPOSED SITE PLAN SETBACKS PER ORDINANCE o . ~ , 30... CCI'~. ! c...... .. -' ~ .~ '- E'.o.IS C2:-....'" cc-=' - ,... -:. ~. rv tJO' FbJ-r ,I ~, _t... L... ~. . ~....-:. I .1 I I - ..: ).. ......... '...",l" .. ... "I " " ~It~~,~ ~C> ,~ :~;. \. ..~ 'e ..~'-' .,,'~~ e -e I ti ~ .~' ~ I:lI:NE I ;ARI- ~ .. ..... ...-.-. ....... , I"'C,~ I 6101::. ~IN4 A '$"~1) 'i.!;~,;,I,' ! - - I ,,' ,. I I ~-:..,~ Ii " N r ... ..,~~ r.... '., .:t" r.:,' '-'L , I ,c. ,.. r-l A ,="r, t ,I ~,/ " t/;/ l' . ( ,\ .,~' .,.:'" ~,.. J' --{--../ . .~~ Clf'~" (" /.;:.. 6" > ~ _/ / u/rl <~?.) -Y ~' REAR. -~ .. N It)' 610& I ~-C ~ ..... c:::n- t!. J;J:EJ1o... ~'.' ,~ ,'..J~S;> M.,.c; e e ~ '" lItb "",.;:II!' ~ C> - ...\..--..,.."" .~ " ~ ~I WI ~.-s..-~_. , ...., e e l"O.~ 50'~ . :-i-,j t. \;". ~-14~ \~ ~ ce:...,..; I -.18:1- ~ .. --~ .r I ~. .J f." ~ J..! I) ':: 'IT '. " - , 30-<<' . I I .oct e.tsr.! C1~ .~ oJ IEV'"::.' ~ , , ~ '~ .;. 1:'....... <<_~r.o :-s~ .. N ,- I .,' / .,1 / ,/ '-/1 .... I " ,fIe - .", o:!">' ~ .it t ).\01I:1"~ :jOt 6,ex.-' (~iTIN~ A. -6~T ~L,- r lIIL to. ,: '-~ " _ ,I ,.-' .'..:.. ,- --1 I , __ X. ...,.....~ I ..~ // "":) I ~~,7 q./.;, T~, / A- ;/'. '~. - . '-~ .' e."~" (, \la' ~ /) ~ -.-/ ~l) // h' --'I I I. 50' ~ i I , ,I t::.:.~ ...;' . p . ~. ... . _..~ I I I I --).. "\..A.... !-"'%.. . i ~.,:,., , j '", ~ . Exhibit C PROPOSED SITE PLAN SETBACKS PER LAYOUT ~ :1 ". '-~ ~ . . , . ~ i N .. ....._ . ~l " ~... -- -. .~~ o#-<I~&> ....~ , . e e 11 April 1983 Mayor City Council Planning Commision. Shorewood. MN Attached are the drawings for the proposed addition for our home at 28015 Woodside Road. We purchased the home in May of 1977 when we moved from Florida. We had no indication at the time of purchase that the lot was considered sub standard. nor that existing structure(s) were in violation of local set-back laws. The planned addition is for the purpose of making our home more useable for ourselves as well as making it saleable in the future. You will note the date of the plan is 1981. My husband was transferred to Indiana in 1979. We put our home up for sale in August of 1979 for $125.000. The real estate market was a sellers market at that time and we were assured by our brokers the house should sell quite rapidly for that figure. We had our home on the market for 12 months until August of 1980. when we finally gave up trying. We had lowered the price several times after buying a home in Indianapolis. We sold the home in Indianapolis two months after putting it on the market. My husband quit the company he was working for there and returned to Minneapolis. We again tried to sell the house in 1981 as we wanted to move on the lake and needed larger bedrooms and kitchen. This time the house was on the market six months before we again gave up. Both times the house was on the market. we had excellent showings. During the first month each time we averaged over 5 showings a week. During discussions with the brokers. they advised us of the reasons people were not interested in the house. 1) Bedrooms were too small (we can't have a dresser in the bedroom because of the size). 2) Kitchen was too small and dark (there are only 3 recessed lights in the kitchen and one small window). 3) No eating area in the kitchen (there's not even room for a chair). 4) No front entrance to the house. 5) The side and front yards are unusable (steep fncline on the side. woods in the front) and the back yard is too small and hilly. 6) No storage in garage. ~l e e -2- We decided if we were to stay in the house. we had the same complaints. If we ever expected to get a reasonable return on our investment. we would have to correct its shortcomings. We went to an architect at Lyman Lumber. and asked him to come out and see the property and draw up plans which would cor- rect the defects. He drew up the p1 ans understandi ng the .1 imitati ons of the lot (steep. hilly inclines which wash out during heavy rains). During the past two years. we have been dealing with builders and rising interest rates, trying to pick a time to start when costs would not be pro- hibitive. We have selected the builder and the bank has agreed to the loan at a rate which we could afford. When we came to the City for a building permit we found that in order to make the improvements required in order for our property to be worth what it is currently being appraised, we must obtain a variance to extend beyond the set back restrictions. You will note from the drawing the existing house is 50+ feet from the lot line on the North and West sides (although the pool and fence erected by the previous owner is less than 10 feet on the West). The existing house is approximately 33 feet from the East lot line. For our proposed remodeling, we are requesting a 30.5-35 feet set back on the West and an additional ten to fourteen feet on the East. The neighbors adjacent to our property on the East and the South have agreed with our plans as they will enhance the property and their view of it. We request that you grant this variance to allow us to make our home not only more livable for ourselves, but also to allow us a reasonable return on our investment should we be required to sell in the future. ~. . \ r~n \.:~ot~ 1, ( 1\ ~ ~,,-,\,...~,,-, t l~l ('~ q Donald and Marilyn Wambo1J 28015 Woodside Road Shorewood. MN D-2- ~ e e STREETER A 17809 HUTCHINS DRIVE, MINNETONKA, MINNESOTA 55343, PHONE (812) 474.5291 ~DRl"S -- REALTORS April 11,1983 To Whom It May Concern: In reference to the property located at 28015 Woodside Road, Shorewood, Minnesota, we~'have had a long history of marketing the subject property with our company. One listing period was 12 months and the second for 6 months. Extensive efferts were made to sell the property with no offers being tendered. The primary reason in our experience in showing the prop- erty and also receiving comments from other Multiple List- ing companies showing the property are the following. Inadequate size of bedrooms No true front entry Inadequate kitchen size No space for entertaining guests Our opinion is that the subject property could be made marketable with an expansion of the existing home to correct tbe~existing functional ob1so1esence~. Respectfully submitted, 4~~ Fred Ke110g9,CRS.! ,4...tUi.__ ~.i! ~ Bette Syverson,CRS Streeter-Andrus, Inc.REALTORS. REAL ESTATE IN THE LAKE M1NNETONKA AND WEST SU8UR8AN AREA RESIDENTIAL . COMMERCIAL . APPRAISALS . LAND DEVELOPMENT O~3 , , CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MONDAY, APRiL 11, 1983 COUNCIL CHAMBERS 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD SHOREWOOD, MN 7:30 PM MI1~UTES CALL TO ORDER The regular meeting of the Shorewood City Council was called to order by Mayor Rascop at 7:30 P~i, Monday, April 11, 1983, in the Council Chambers. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE AND PRAYER The meeting opened with the Pledge of Allegiance and a prayer. ROLL CALL Present: Mayor Rascop, Councilmembers Haugen, Shaw, Leonardo, and Stover. Staff: Attorney Larson, Engineer Norton, Administrator Uhrhammer and Clerk Kennelly APPROVAL OF MINUTES Haugen moved, seconded by Shaw, to approve the minutes as amended for the Council meeting of March 28, 1983. Motion carried unanimously. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR Clean-up Day Residents asked the Council about when the City "Clean-up Day" will be and what is necessary to do in order to obtain a burning permit. Council will be deciding the time and fee schedule later. They explained some of the necessary steps for burning permit requests. Complaint of Non-notification of Hearing Mr. and Mrs. Mike Marr were present to voice a complaint in reference to receiving incorrect information as to the date that the Council would be making their decision on the Conditional Use Permit to allow the building of an office building at the Southwest corner of Chaska Road and State Highway #7. They were opposed to this construction and the removal of the nature buffer to Highway #7. Council apologized for the incorrect information they received from staff. Marr's requested to see all the plans for building, when they are submitted. Council will instruct the Building Inspector to notify Marr's when all the plans are received. ::#/t:L--/ , , REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING -2- APRIL 11, 1983 MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR continued Timber Lane Lake Access Steve Haskins from Timber Lane was present to thank the Council for it's efforts in writing a letter to the Governor's Task Force opposing the possible installation of a lake access on Timber Lane. PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT Shaw indicated that the matters the Planning Commission dealt with will be reviewed tonight with various other agenda items. He also recommended that a representative from the Planning Commission should be in attendance at the Council meetings in the future. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT Insurance Group Administrator Uhrhammer requested insurance coverage with the County Group Health Policy. One of the insurance companies involved did not want to accept the City at this time. Another review will be made in October. He felt we should also research the possibility of joining the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Group. "Clean-up Day" 1ge3 Budget did not contain enough money to subsidize tota I.ly a spring clean-up. Administrator Uhrhammer will review and submit user-fee rates at the next meeting. PUBLIC HEARING - 8:00 PM RESOLUTION NO. 27-83 Dan Randall-24655 Smithtown Road Mr. Randall was present to request the to build a second home on his property Road. He would like to be allowed six present existing home. Public portion of this hearing was closed at 8:07 PM with no public comment. Council to allow him located at 24655 Smithtown (6) months to remove the Shaw moved, seconded by Stover, to allow the construction of this new home on the condition that the existing home be removed within 180 days of the issuance of the building permit. Motion passed unanimously by Roll Call vote. 5 ayes. MAYOR'S REPORT LMCD - Shorewood Yacht Club Permit The Public hearing was tabled in reference to the Shorewood Yacht Club dock license. . , REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING -3- APRIL 11, 1983 MAYOR'S REPORT - continued State Aid Formula The new State-aid formula will reduce Shorewood funding approximately $26,000.00 from last years amount if accepted at the current formula proposed. PUBLIC HEARING - 8:15 PM RESOLUTION NO. 28-83 Minnetonka State Bank-Sign Variance Request BobM~ Dougall from the Minnetonka State Bank was present to request a square footage variance to allow them to install 3 signs containing one 81.5 square feet and two 18 square feet. City ordinance allows one sign of 150 square feet and two additional signs of 10 square feet. Mr. Mc Dougall is requesting to be allowed two 8 foot variances for the signs to be installed on the building. Public comment portion was closed at 8:28 PM after receiving comment from Bob Reutiman in approval of this request. Shaw moved, seconded by Stover,to approve the variance as requested. Motion carried 4 aye - 1 nay (Leonardo) (Haugen noted her decision was based on the Planning Commission " recommendation) PRELIMINARY PLAT REVIEW RESOLUTION NO. 29-83 Oak Ridge Estates-3rd Addition Joe Gorecki submitted the proposal for Oak Ridge Estates 3rd Addition containing 8 new lots. He submitted some new changes as recommended and he feels they now have complied with all requirements. Engineer Norton reviewed various points that need to be clarified. 1.) Legal change of road names within the sub division. 2.) The need for additional soil borings. Mr Gorecki disagreed on the need, but the property owner, Mr. Noble, agreed to have further borings done as requested. Council questioned the water system issue. Central well versus individual well; Easements granted for utilities or lines installed now for future use . Engine_er Norton estimated the cost of a Central well and lines a~ approximately $35,000.00, which would be the same as individual well. Developer disagreed with the central well because of the up front cost to him. Council discussed "Water Policy". Attorney Larson determined that there is no current policy in effect. . . REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING -4- APRIL 11, 1983 Oak Ridge Estates 3rd addition-Preliminary Plat Review continued Haugen moved, seconded by Leonardo, approval of the preliminary plat with the following conditions: 1. Additional soil borings to be done to Engineer's satisfaction. 2. Storm sewer and drainage constructed according to City Engineer's specifications. 3. Streets and sanitary sewer system to City Speci- fications. 4. Development agreement to be drawn up by City Attorney and signed. Motion carried unanimously by Roll Call vote. 5 ayes. l'-lr. Noble thanked the Council and Staff for their cooperation with his development. Council Break: for student interviews at 9:15 PM; returned at 9:30 PM. REVIEW OF AMENDMENT TO ZONING ORDINANCE Mortenson Property - 19545 & 19585 State Highway #7 Council reviewed the request to rezone this property from an R-l, Residential Zone, to a C-l, Commercial Zone. Mr. Hubbard, developer, presented plans for a "Self-Storage facility" for that location. This facility would have an on-site manager with a security system. Most of the storage buildings would be 11 feet in height with 2 buildings at 20 feet in height. Council had concerns about C-l zoning being the correct zone for that area, and whether it was the best use of the property. Haugen moved, seconded by Rascop, to refer this issue back to the Planner and Administrator for further review of the appropriate zoning for this area. Motion denied, 2 ayes, 3 nays (Shaw, Leonardo and Stover) MOVING OF BUILDINGS ORDINANCE NO. 143 The Council reviewed the 3rd reading of the proposed "Moving of Buildings" Ordinance. A few alterations were made in wording. Haugen moved, seconded by Leonardo, to adopt the proposed Ordinance as amended. Ordinance was adopted by roll call vote. 5 ayes. . , REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING -5- APRIL 11, 1983 COUNCIL REPORT Public Hearing FOR Cable T.V. will be held at City Hall at 7:30 PM on Tuesday, April 12, 1983, for the purpose of receiving comments from the public on the "request for proposal". Special Meeting Stover requested the Council to set a special meeting for the purpose of reviewing and setting Water policy and consideration of any other needed policies. This meeting will be held on May 4th at 6:00 PM at City Hall. APPROVAL OF CLAIMS AND ADJOURNMENT Haugen moved, seconded by Shaw, to approve claims for payment followed by adjournment at 11:05 PM. Motion carried unanimously. General Fund - [Account #00166] Checks 26968 - 27044 = $94,266.42 Liquor Fund - [Account #00174] Checks 9913 - 9953 = $24,315.49 Respectfully submitted, Mayor Sandra L. Kennelly, Clerk SLK: sn I MOVE THAT THE COUNCIL INSTRUCT THE STAFF TO PREPARE AN AMENDMENT TO ORDINANCE 77 TO INCLUDE SELF-STORAGE FACILITIES, AS A CONDITIONAL PERMITTED USE IN THE C-1 DISTRICT, (USING THE CONDITIONS MENTIONED IN THE PLANNER" S REPORT OF MARCH 11, 1983)) AND TO REMOVE THE "EATING AND DRINKING PLACES" FROM THE C-1 DISTRICT, PLACING THAT USE IN THE C-2 DISTRICT - CONSISTENT WITH THE PROPOSED NEW ZONING ORDINANCE. e e MAYOR Robert Rascop COUNCIL Jan Haugen Tad Shaw Alexander Leonardo Robert Gagne ADMINISTRATOR Doug Uhrhammer CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD . SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 · (612) 474-3236 MEMORANDUM TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: BRAD NIELSEN DATE: APRIL 22, 1983 RE: BAY PARK ADDITION - FINAL PLAT FILE NO: 405 (83.09) Mr. Theodore Deikel has submitted a final plat for the Bay Park Addition. As you recall the preliminary plat involved a lot width variance, allowing a 50 foot strip along the northerly side of the property to serve as access to the northernmost parcel which contains an existing house. City approval of the variance and preliminary plat was contingent upon five specific conditions (see Council minutes dated August 9, 1982). The final plat is consistent with the approved preliminary plat. It should be noted that Lot 2 is just over 150 feet wide along the lake. Drainage and utility easements along property lines have been provided as per City requirements. However the City Engineer has noted that the easements for existing utilities have not been shown. These should be included on the final plat. Three of the Council's requirements relate to future division of the large southerly parcel. These items should be addressed in a development agree- ment between the City and develooer. The City Attorney is currently pre- paring said d~velopment agreement. While it is assumed that Outlot A will be owned by the owner of Lot 2, this should be specified in the development agreement. The agreement should also clearly specify that future owners should be aware that Outlot A is intended for future use as a public street. cc: Doug Uhrhammer Jim Norton Gary Larson Ted Deikel A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore CITY OF SHOREWOOD MAYOR Robert Rascop COUNCIL Jan Haugen Tad Shaw Alexander Leonardo Robert Gagne ADMINISTRATOR Doug Uhrhammer 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD . SHOREWOOD. MINNESOTA 55331 . (612) 474-3236 MEMORANDUM TO: Planning Commission, Mayor and City Council FROM: Brad Nielsen DATE: 17 April 1983 RE: Wambold, Donald - Variance Request FILE NO.: 405 (83.07) Attached is a request from Mr. and Mrs. Donald Wambold to expand their exist- ing house at 28015 Woodside Road (see Exhibit A, attached). The house is cur- rently nonconforming due to inadequate setback on the east side (see Exhibit B, attached). Since Section 10 of the existing Zoning Ordinance specifically pro- hibits the expansion of nonconforming structures, the Wambolds have requested a variance. Their request is expressed in detail in the attached letter, dated 11 April, from them to the Council and Planning Commission (see attachments D-1, D-2 and D-3). Their problem stems from a number of factors. First, their lot contains only 21,000 square feet in an R-1 District, which requires 40,000 square feet. Secondly, they have a corner lot which requires larger side yard setbacks abutting the street. Finally, the Zoning Ordinance has changed, more specifi- cally defining where certain setbacks are required. This problem is high- lighted when comparing the required setbacks shown on Exhibit B with the way the lot was originally layed out on Exhibit C. As can be seen, the property (with the exception of the pool area) would conform if the north side were considered the front. Unfortunately, variances are still required to allow the proposed expansions, regardless of what is considered front or side. As in the past, we suggest that the City review the proposed Zoning Ordinance Revision currently under study by the City Council. Although the new ordi- nance allows more flexibility than the existing, in that nonconforming structures are allowd to expand as long as the nonconformity is not increased, this offers little relief to the applicants. As proposed, both the garage addition and the kitchen/deck/gazebo addition will increase the nonconformity of the house. A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore Shorewood Planning Commission, Mayor and City Council 17 April 1983 Page Two It is suggested that the Planning Commission, in making its recommendation to the Council, review Section 6, Subd. 2 of the Shorewood Zoning Ordinance relative to variances. BJN:kw cc: Doug Uhrhammer Jim Norton Gary Larson Donald Wambold Kathy West ~f; ~\rl . M"~ 14. ~ .. . 'SII.IS"~ 0.." T I~JI.~ .(:'hci.. SURVE.~ ~i) E.(G,) c f ,.''N f1 , ~ .. / .. //' (I <I) Lor 4 At/a l ~ Exhibit A SITE LOCATION Wambold Variance Request 'I- 5 ~ t"-n-\ ~ C\J 95 "'=%00' 21.1D @) ... . . . V1 o .. !a Ii I~ '~ i~ ~ ~ i\ .( -'" -z - , ~?~~\ ',. . ," ~...~ kl:t#;~;i o .~,' ,"".....,' - ~ , ~ ---- ',Q,O'S$ _____ If H, !lJ ~ ,- - ~I~ ~~ ~ tl~ a~ , t '\- 'f. l ,. f ~\ ~i ) I i ij~ , .. ! I~ ,..~ I ;~ i ~, ('-.s .1 ' .. a~ " , i - . ~ _ -,(/X~~ ~ r,~ ~',. . '.,~ . l .'" ".9n ~ t, . ." '"" ,,-' '\1.,' ,~,.. :'''\ ....11: ,iis'.'.' ,....." ""' ::-~l' '\J ",' ~. ': ,"( 0" ~ ij ~ ,J,.~ \:;~~ I lJ I(~ .,) v '8 - ..1 ~ ~J , .. () " . . to' \ .,. 4;", " " .) ~,S2 ...:. -- J - . .; . T 1 ~ ... " 'jJ ... .~ c ,1 ..( j J ''j.. ~ -:' h ....j-,. -. ....:t :1 jf .......1 J " I ~ W U Z z< <~ ...:10 A;t:X: wO E-tt:X: HW ~eI)A; Oel) .j.Jw~ '.-l eI) U ..00...... ..-l A; ..... ...c:0~ ><t:X:E-t WA;~ q .J ti ~ j..! ':: ., t ~9:f* Exhibit C PROPOSED SITE PLAN SETBACKS PER LAYOUT Il V 'V'," ~rrll:b'rool,::E' ~C> ~ ~,:~:l:'.-:.~~-~: ".,~'~ ...~ ~I ..s ~ ~.'w.,. . ,'. '. ... , ~ l"O.~ oo'~ ~.".'~.~..'...'.~"".'..,"". ,~~ .::~. ',,~ .t. \1...: ~'''~ ~ r::;c~ I ~"., ~ ...... .... ~,...... ":.;' . r eY'~' ~ 30.<<, e><lSJ. !. C1~ ~ - ~ '''-': .;. r....... c:%--.r", ~~ , " ..... / -:'!,">'rv ._:C " , !)() 6, ex..- (~iTIN~ A. ~~T ,: --~, '1 I. I I ~ I I , I 50'~ :::." ...:' ~,', \-. .... .,-fle, I I ~ - )... "'-L.. r-"~,, V .j WI If t .... !;..;.:.. .::," , j , .... 'Z: ~ '-"Eo " 'ji I":'" t:"'" ~l /.1 , ~cT , ,.. I ....:Y' q,/../ ,r;/ /'. ,:( -~, ~ ,), .' .' ~ .~ i N . .. -. 'L-<::.n" I!. .~."! I , " .. ~..H (..iC.,J;> ,....,.c;. 11 April 1983 Mayor City Council Planning Commision. Shorewood, MN Attached are the drawings for the proposed addition for our home at 28015 Woodside Road. We purchased the home in May of 1977 when we moved from Florida. We had no indication at the time of purchase that the lot was considered sub standard, nor that existing structure(s) were in violation of local set-back laws. The planned addition is for the purpose of making our home more useable for ourselves as well as making it saleable in the future. You will note the date of the plan is 1981. My husband was transferred to Indiana in 1979. We put our home up for sale in August of 1979 for $125,000. The real estate market was a sellers market at that time and we were assured by our brokers the house should sell quite rapidly for that figure. We had our home on the market for 12 months until August of 1980, when we finally gave up trying. We had lowered the price several times after buying a home in Indianapolis. We sold the home in Indianapolis two months after putting it on the market. My husband quit the company he was working for there and returned to Minneapolis. We again tried to sell the house in 1981 as we wanted to move on the lake and needed larger bedrooms and kitchen. This time the house was on the market six months before we again gave up. Both times the house was on the market, we had excellent showings. During the first month each time we averaged over 5 showings a week. During discussions with the brokers, they advised us of the reasons people were not interested in the house. 1) Bedrooms were too small (we can't have a dresser in the bedroom because of the size). 2) Kitchen was too small and dark (there are only 3 recessed lights in the kitchen and one small window). 3) No eating area in the kitchen (there's not even room for a chair). 4) No front entrance to the house. 5) The side and front yards are unusable (steep incline on the side, woods in the front) and the back yard is too small and hilly. 6) No storage in garage. D-( -2- We decided if we were to stay in the house, we had the same complaints. If we ever expected to get a reasonable return on our investment, we would have to correct its shortcomi ngs. We went to .an architect at Lyman Lumber, and asked him to come out and see the property and draw up plans which would cor- rect the defects. He drew up the plans understanding the limitations of the lot (steep, hilly inclines which wash out during heavy rai~s). During the past two years, we have been dealing with builders and rlslng interest rates, trying to pick a time to start when costs would not be pro- hibitive. We have selected the builder and the bank has agreed to the loan at a rate which we could afford. When we came to the City for a building permit we found that in order to make the improvements required in order for our property to be worth what it is currently being appraised, we must obtain a variance to extend beyond the set back restrictions. You will note from the drawing the existing house is 50+ feet from the lot line on the North and West sides (although the pool and fence erected by the previous owner is less than 10 feet on the West). The existing house is approximately 33 feet from the East lot line. For our proposed remodeling, we are requesting a 30.5-35 feet set back on the West and an additional ten to fourteen feet on the East. The neighbors adjacent to our property on the East and the South have agreed with our plans as they will enhance the property and their view of it. We request that you grant this variance to allow us to make our home not only more livable for ourselves, but also to allow us a reasonable return on our investment should we be required to sell in the future. -, . \ 0~n ~~~~~ 4 ( 1\ ~ ~ ~.\~,~vv L ~):U\~ d) Donald and Marilyn wambolJ 28015 Woodside Road Shorewood, MN D-2- ~ STREETER ANDRes REALTORS 17809 HUTCHINS DRIVE, MINNETONKA, MINNESOTA 55343, PHONE (612) 474.5291 Apri 1 11, 1983 To Whom It May Concern: In reference to the property located at 28015 Woodside Road, Shorewood, Minnesota, wel'have had a long history of marketing the subject property with our company. One listing period was 12 months and the second for 6 months. Extensive efferts were maae to sell the property with no offers being tendered. The primary reason in our experience in showing the prop- erty and also receiving comments from other Multiple List- ing companies showing the property are the following. Inadequate size of bedrooms No true front entry inadequate kitchen size No space for entertaining guests Our opinion is that the subject property could be made marketable with an expansion of the existing home to correct tbe~existing functional ob1so1esencez. Respectfully submitted, 4~~ Fred Ke11ogg,CRS.~ ~~iFl-- .2y-r.i~~ Bette Syverson,CRS Streeter-Andrus, Inc.REALTORS. REAL ESTATE IN THE LAKE MINNETONKA AND WEST SUBURBAN AREA RESIDENTIAL . COMMERCIAL . APPRAISALS . LAND DEVELOPMENT O~3