The URL can be used to link to this page

06-03-14 Planning Comm Mtg AgendaCITY OF SHOREWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING TUESDAY, 3 JUNE 2014 AGENDA CALL TO ORDER APPROVAL OF AGENDA APPROVAL OF MINUTES 6 May 2014 COUNCIL CHAMBERS 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD 7:00 P.M. ROLL CALL / (LIAISON) SCHEDULE DAVIS (May) GENG (Jan) LABADIE (Mar) MADDY (Apr) MUEHLBERG (Feb) 1. 7:00 PM PUBLIC HEARING — MINOR SUBDIVISION /COMBINATION, C.U.P., AND VARIANCE Applicants: Peter and Marie Lehman Location: 21265/21285 Radisson Road & 5625/5635 Merry Lane 2. 7:15 PM PUBLIC HEARING — CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Applicant: Northern State Power Co. (Xcel Energy) Location: 5505 County Road 19 3. MINOR SUBDIVISION /COMBINATION (LOT LINE REARRANGEMENT Applicant: Darin Busch Location: 5360/5366 Vine Hill Road 4. MINOR SUBDIVISION /COMBINATION (LOT LINE REARRANGEMENT) Applicant: William Zucco Location: 4485/4545 Enchanted Point 5. REVIEW DRAFT ORDINANCE REGARDING ELDERLY HOUSING Planning Commission Meeting Agenda 3 June 2014 Page 2 6. DETERMINE LIAISONS TO COUNCIL FOR JUNE THROUGH DECEMBER 2014 7. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR 8. OLD BUSINESS / NEW BUSINESS 9. DRAFT NEXT MEETING AGENDA 10. REPORTS Liaison to Council SLUC Other 11. ADJOURNMENT CITY OF SHOREWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING TUESDAY, MAY 6, 2014 MINUTES CALL TO ORDER Chair Geng called the meeting to order at 7:07 P.M. ROLL CALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD Present: Chair Geng; Commissioners Davis and Maddy; and Planning Director Nielsen Absent: Commissioners Labadie and Muehlberg APPROVAL OF AGENDA 7:00 P.M. Maddy moved, Davis seconded, approving the agenda for May 6, 2014, as presented. Motion passed 310. APPROVAL OF MINUTES April 1, 2014 Davis moved, Maddy seconded, approving the Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of April 1, 2014, as presented. Motion passed 310. STUDY SESSION 1. DISCUSS SENIOR HOUSING Director Nielsen noted this is the third time the Planning Commission has started doN -,n the path of discussing senior housing in the City. He explained there has been some interest shoN -,n by developers in senior housing for the SmithtoN -,n Crossing Redevelopment Study area and another area in the City. He has told the developers that the City's density regulations Nvill not meet their needs for the types of projects they are considering. He recommended the Planning Commission and City Council address it before a developer comes in Nvith a proposal. He explained his staff report goes through the three levels of elderly (senior) housing included in the City's Zoning Code, noting that the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) refers to it as housing for people over 55. The levels are: 1) independent living; 2) assisted living (minimal care); and, 3) care facilities. There are different styles of independent living Nvith one being the "cottage style ". There Nvere two successful cottage style independent developments done in the City — the Shorewood Ponds and The Seasons. Those developments seemed to have satisfied people for a time. The City does not have any apartment style independent living, assisted living or care facilities. CITY OF SHOREWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Matt 6, 2014 Page 2of7 Over a Near ago the City amended its Code to alloy for accessory apartments. That Nyould support adult children moving back in Nyith their parents and having their oN -,n living quarters or parents could move in Nyith their children and have their oN -,n living quarters. To date there have not been many applications made to do that. The senior housing developers he has spoken N ith have talked about various things. One talked about having all three levels in one project. Another spoke about a cooperative senior apartments project. The City Ordinance addresses nursing homes. Senior apartments and assisted living are not possible under the City s density regulations. The SmithtoN -,n Crossing Redevelopment Study area has betvyeen 4 and 6 acres depending on Nyhether or not the last tNyo residential lots (one of Nyhich is ovmed by the City) are included. If the 4 acres Nyere to be developed Nyith the City s current density of 10 units per acre only a 40 -unit facility could be built. Developers Nyant to develop larger facilities. The size of projects discussed ranged from a 60 -unit project to a 100 -unit project. There has been discussion about considering an independent living project from a density perspective and having a reduced density for assisted living. Generally there are feNyer couples living at assisted living facilities and feNy of them are still driving vehicles. For care facilities parking is needed for the employees and visitors only. Staff has researched the elderIv housing standards for eight communities in the area that have fairly contemporary zoning ordinances — the Cities of Burnsville, Chanhassen, Chaska, Eden Prairie, Minnetonka, Minnetrista, PIN-mouth and Wayzata. In general most cities that alloy senior housing and assisted living tend to reduce the density requirements somevyhat. For the SmithtoN -,n Crossing Redevelopment Study area one of the options for a mixed -use project Nyas to alloy the entire site, including the commercial area, to be counted for density purposes. Another for that area Nyould be to increase the alloNyable density for that area (e.g., 15 or 17 units per acre). Assisted living units Nyould be counted as partial units (e.g., one -half units). Another approach is a density transfer Nyhich Nyould alloy for transferring alloNyable density from another site and applying it to the subject site. For example, the alloNyable 8 units per acre for the City- ovried lot at the end of the area located in the R -1C District could be transferred to the other 4 acres. He recommended the Planning Commission explore some, if not all, of the options Nyith a specific focus on the SmithtoN -,n Crossing Redevelopment Study area. It is the only site that involves commercial property. The property another senior housing developer Nyas looking at is zoned R -1C Nyhich alloys 10 units per acre. He is not sure he Nyould recommend a density increase for that property because the R -1C zoning district is supposed to be transitional zoning. He suggested changing zoning density for the SmithtoN -,n Crossing Redevelopment Study area only and making a change so that assisted living units do not count as full units. One developer he spoke Nyas considering an 80 -unit project N ith 30 independent apartments, 30 assisted living units and 20 beds for care. He thought the City Ordinance could be amended in such a Nyay as to make that project Nyork if assisted living is not considered a full unit. If that Nyasn't the case the density Nyould have to be increased to 15 units per acre assuming the entire site is used. With regard to parking, the City requires tNyo spaces per unit for any type of senior housing. A lot of cities alloy less than that. For example, Burnsville requires 1 space per dvyelling unit for retirement housing Nyith one -half of them being enclosed. For assisted living it requires one -half space per dvyelling unit. For nursing care facilities it requires 1 space per bed plus 1 space per employee for the maximum shift of CITY OF SHOREWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING May 6, 2014 Page 3of7 employees. Developers are going to argue that 2 spaces are not needed for apartment style independent living because residents typically only have one vehicle. One Nvay of addressing that is to require proof of parking Nvhich requires the developer to provide for 2 spaces per unit yet only require that a lesser number be built. The developer Nvill have to allow for the amount of parking that Nvould be needed be the City Nvill not allow for on- street parking on SmithtoN -,n Road. For senior housing projects the City gives breaks on utility charges and park dedication fees. If the facilities are later converted to condominiums, for example, the remainder of the park dedication fees Nvould have to be paid and the additional parking Nvould have to be built. Nielsen stated if the Commission is agreeable he Nvould like to take some of the things discussed and put them into ordinance format and hold a public hearing on the amendments. In response to a comment from Commissioner Geng, Director Nielsen explained that technically the Nvay the SmithtoN -,n Crossing Redevelopment Study area is zoned it does not allow senior housing at all. The City could allow that under a planned unit development (PUD) Nvhich senior housing requires. The City could allow a mixed -use development. There currentIv is no standard for the C -1 zoning district. The R -C zoning district allows 10 units per acre. It is reasonable to assume that if senior housing Neill be alloNved in the C -1 zoning district that the City Nvould allow at least 10 units per acre. Director Nielsen stated that most of the 8 cities researched don't allow terribly high density Nvith the exception of Wayzata Nvhich allows as much as 43 units per acre for a project for people over 62 Nears old. Commissioner Geng asked if that changed recently to accommodate the new development. Nielsen highlighted the density of some of the other cities. He noted that Chanhassen does not allow a break for assisted living — a unit is a unit. Geng asked if those communities are attracting senior housing developers. Nielsen responded they are and noted the City is competing against those cities Nvhich allow density over 10 units per acre. Nielsen noted that none of the cities alloNved for high -rise apartments senior housing. The City is in svne Nvith the heights they allow. Commissioner Davis noted that cooperatives have to be 3 stories high. She stated they appear to be long structures. Director Nielsen displayed some draNvings of different types of developments Commissioner Davis stated she thought 80 units per acre for the SmithtoN -,n Crossing Redevelopment Studv area Nvould be too many. She then stated there Nvas a mixed use elderly housing project for another city and people Nvere not interested in the independent living units because they Nvere associated Nvith the assisted living and care facilities. It ended up being all assisted living, care facility and hospice care. She noted that she thinks that is a failed strategy. Director Nielsen stated he has seen that mixed elderIv housing Nvork. He then stated the care facility could be separate. Commissioner Geng stated Presbyterian Homes in Spring Park has all three levels of elderly care and noted that it is quite a large campus. Geng asked Nvhat potential developers are saying about the commercial aspect of the SmithtoN -,n Crossing Redevelopment Study area. Director Nielsen stated one of the developers Nvould like to use the entire 4 acres for senior housing, hoNvever, he told that person that the SmithtoN -,n Crossing Redevelopment Study indicates a desire to have some of the site be commercial. CITY OF SHOREWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING May 6, 2014 Page 4of7 Director Nielsen stated one developer did a senior housing project and VFW together. Commissioner Davis said the daily lunches and bingo Nvere a big hit. Director Nielsen stated the City needs to be ready for when a developer Nvants to be serious about redeveloping the SmithtoN -,n Crossing Redevelopment Study area. Commissioner Geng asked hoNv developers have reacted to the SmithtoN -,n Crossing Redevelopment Studv. Director Nielsen responded they appreciate having it. Director Nielsen asked the Commissioners Nvhat their thoughts are on the different options he presented. Commissioner Davis stated that all of the options should be available. Commissioner Geng concurred and noted that doing so Nvould maintain maximum flexibility. Director Nielsen stated the SmithtoN -,n Crossing Redevelopment Study conveys that the more a developer does Nvhat the City Nvould like the more the developer gets. He then stated he thought the options could be Nvorked into an ordinance amendment. He noted he has no problem Nvith it applying to just the SmithtoN -,n Crossing Redevelopment Study area. He stated he needs to give 10 units to the acre for the R -C zoning district more thought. He suggested looking at the R -C sites before making that suggestion. Commissioner Davis stated her property is 1.23 acres in size. If there Nvere to be 30 units on her property all parking Nvould have to be underground for residents. She then stated the co -op her mother -in -law lives in has about 20 parking spaces outside vet she has never had a problem finding a parking space Nvhen she goes there. There is also parking on the street behind. Director Nielsen stated he Nvill draft a Zoning Code text amendment Nvhich Nvould incorporate the options he has spoken about. He then stated he Nvill lay out the scenarios he spoke about for the Smithtown Crossing Redevelopment Study area (e.g., Nvhat Nvould 15 units to the acre look like on the 4 acres). The height for the 4 acre site Nvould be 3 stories. The 2 residential lots, if they are included, Nvould be limited to 2.5 stories. He noted a public hearing Nvould have to be held for the amendment. He stated he does not think the SmithtoN -,n Crossing Redevelopment Study Nvould have to be amended if the ordinance amendment is approved. Commissioner Davis recommended looking at the SmithtoN -,n Crossing Redevelopment Study to ensure everything is up to date. Commissioner Maddy expressed concern about the demographics when the baby boomer generation stops accelerating their entry into senior living housing. He questioned Nvhat Nvill happen to all of that housing that gets built. Commissioner Davis asked Nvhat Neill happen to all of the memory care facilities everv,vvhere. Commissioner Maddv clarified he does not Nvant to shut the door on reuse for the SmithtoN -,n Crossing Redevelopment Studer area. But, he also does not Nvant to have a huge traffic mess in 20 Nears. Director Nielsen stated that by requiring proof of parking the parking situation could be handled if the development Nvas converted to condominiums. Commissioner Geng stated he is intrigued by the proof of parking stipulation CITY OF SHOREWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING May 6, 2014 Page 5of7 Commissioner Maddv stated he likes having some commercial as part of the mix for the site. He asked if a commercial and senior living mix Nvould be included in the text amendment strictly for the SmithtoN -,n Crossing Redevelopment Study area. Director Nielsen noted the SmithtoN -,n Crossing Redevelopment Study suggests a mixed use zoning district for that area. He stated that because there is only one project area that the ordinance amendment Nvould apply to the mixed use could be addressed Nvith the PUD requirements already included in the Zoning Code. Commissioner Maddy stated during a discussion Nvith a developer who built a multi -unit development N-,-here one side of the structure overlooked the river and the other side overlooked the street he learned that the first units to go Nvere those that overlooked the street because residents Nvanted to Nvatch activity outside. Director Nielsen stated the last time the Planning Commission discussed the Smithtown Crossing Redevelopment Study area they Nvanted at least some portion of the site to be developed commercial. The Studv does not sav how much should be commercial. Commissioner Davis stated a potential developer presented a concept of some type at an American Legion meeting. Director Nielsen stated he Nvill have a draft ordinance text amendment ready for the June 3 Planning Commission meeting. Commissioner Maddv stated the marina property could be another place for senior housing. 2. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR There Nvere no matters from the floor presented this evening. 3. OLD BUSINESS / NEW BUSINESS Commissioner Geng asked Director Nielsen for an update on the proposed Summit Woods planned unit development (PUD). Director Nielsen explained that Council approved the Development Stage plans for the PUD subject to the Planning Commission's recommendations and staff s recommendations. Council also added the condition of having staff and the developer assess the site lines and location of the drivewav for the most northerIv lot. There Nvas discussion about moving it doN -,n and possibly consolidating it Nvith the second lot. Staff and the developer have determined that it Nvould be better to locate that particular driveway as far north as possible so that it lined up Nvith Summit Avenue versus being more around the corner from it. That could be a moot point if Council chooses the cul -de -sac option for improving Summit Avenue because it Nvould not matter where the drivewav enters the cul -de -sac. He noted Council and staff have taken the residents' comments about the roadway- being substandard and having safety issues seriously and feel serious consideration needs to be given to addressing them whether or not the PUD comes to fruition. He stated the cul -de -sac option is the most feasible of the options albeit not ideal. He explained that Hummingbird Road Nvould end up being a very long cul -de -sac street. He noted that when he first started Nvith the City the City alloNved cul -de -sacs to be 2,000 feet long. The current standard is 700 feet. He explained if no significant improvements to the roadway- are made or if other improvement options are chosen that drivewav needs to be as far north on the lot as possible. He stated the proposed driveway turnouts Neill make it easier for drivers to enter onto Summit Avenue facing forward. CITY OF SHOREWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING May 6, 2014 Page 6of7 He clarified that the Planning Commission Nvill not consider the Final Plan Stage plans. He explained that during Council's consideration of the Development Stage plans on April 14, 2014, someone made the comment that the Planning Commission and Council Nvould both consider the Final Plan Stage plans. He noted there have been times when the Planning Commission had asked to consider the final plans but that Nvas not the case for this PUD. He noted that a fairly long article Nvas published in the April 24, 2014, Sun Sailor Newspaper about the proposed PUD. He stated the residents have made a big issue about Summit Avenue and one resident who has been very vocal about the roadwa -,T objects to any of the improvement options being considered. Commissioner Geng asked Director Nielsen for an update on the proposed Boulder Cove development in the Citv of Chanhassen. Director Nielsen stated that project is moving fonvard. It's his understanding that Chanhassen did conduct some type of traffic study, something Shorewood asked for. He noted Shorewood cannot stop that development. He explained staff had raised concerns about the new units being what is termed NextGen (somewhat like a duplex). Chanhassen has conveyed that the developer Nvill not get to make all of the units NextGen; oniv some. Even if all of the proposed 31 units Nvere regular single - family dwelling units the development Nvould still generate a lot of extra traffic on West 62nd Street and on Strawberry Lane. Shorewood is going to have to look at doing some improvements to Strawberry Lane. For example, constructing a trail or upgrading the roadwa -,T and adding a trail. He noted a lot of children Nvallc on Strawberry Lane. He stated if a trail Nvere constructed there could possibly be a slight reduction in traffic because it Nvould be safer for children to Nvallc to the Minnewashta Elementary School. Commissioner Geng asked if there is any indication that Chanhassen Nvill change its density requirements. Director Nielsen responded he has not heard any indication of that. Nielsen stated he has not seen and -thing in Chanhassen's zoning requirements that require large lots. A 15,000 square foot lot is fairly typical in Chanhassen. Going doN -,n to a 9,000 square foot lot Nvould not be a big deal there. The Metropolitan Council is pushing for affordable housing and density. He noted that West 62nd Street is a substandard roadwa -,T. Anv improvements to it Nvould be a joint effort between Shorewood and Chanhassen. Commissioner Davis stated driving children to the School is not a pleasant experience. She then stated that the new Smithtown Road Nvest sidewalk is beautiful; it Nvas a nice project. Director Nielsen concurred that the trail is very nice. Director Nielsen stated that planning is undenvay for the SmithtoN -,n Road east sideNvallc/trail segment which is slated for construction in 2015. He clarified no decision has been made regarding which side of the roadwaN- it should go on. He noted that the Planning Commission Nvill go on a trail Nvalk for that segment this Near. There Nvas miscellaneous discussion about the notice to remove items on the property located at 25560 SmithtoN -,n Road and a person wanting to build a tree house in a tree located in public right- of -Nvay (ROW). Director Nielsen noted that on the Mav 12, 2014, Council meeting agenda there are three appeals to notices to remove. CITY OF SHOREWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING May 6, 2014 Page 7of7 4. DRAFT NEXT MEETING AGENDA Director Nielsen stated a conditional use permit for Xcel Energy is slated for the June 3, 2014, meeting agenda. There is another application that Nvill also be on the agenda. He Nvill have a draft ordinance for elderly housing drafted for discussion during the meeting. He then stated that as early as June the Planning Commission could go on a trail Nvallc for the SmithtoN -,n Road east trail segment. Commissioner Davis stated when that trail segment Nvas discussed a number of years ago those Nvere the residents that Nvere for it. Director Nielsen clarified some of those residents Nvere in strong opposition to the trail. Commissioner Geng stated the Planning Commission needs to select liaisons to Council meetings during its June meeting. 5. REPORTS Liaison to Council Director Nielsen stated that during its April 28, 2014, meeting Council passed the Korin subdivision. He noted the applicant is reevaluating whether or not it Nvants to subdivide it or sell it as one piece of property. There Nvas miscellaneous discussion about some other properties not related to the Council meeting. SLUC Other Commissioner Davis noted that she Nvill not attend the June 3, 2014, Planning Commission meeting. 6. ADJOURNMENT Maddy moved, Davis seconded, Adjourning the Planning Commission Meeting of May 6, 2014, at 8:22 P.M. Motion passed 310. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, Christine Freeman, Recorder Memorandum Re: Lehman - Minor SubdivisionNariance and C.U.P. 28 May 2014 Building setback variances - Existing garage: 12.8 feet from east side (20 feet required) - Proposed new home (see Exhibit F): 36 feet from Merry Lane (50 feet required) Conditional use permit (C.U.P.) to build a home on a substandard shoreland lot The Lehmans have assembled a substantial packet of material in support of their case. That material will be forwarded electronically for your review. Exhibits B -J, the most pertinent of the material, have been culled from that packet for the purpose of this report. ISSUES AND ANALYSIS A. Zoning Code Compliance. At first glance the variances necessary to accomplish the applicants' plans are viewed as substantial. What is worth noting, however, is the Zoning Code compliance that will result from the proposed plan: Although Tract A is being reduced rather substantially in area (38,758 square feet down to 24,848 square feet), it is still considered to be buildable (except for its width, the lot is similar in size to an R -1C lot. At the same time, Tract B is being made substantially larger (7500 square feet up to 21,410 square feet). The result is that Tract B is significantly more buildable than the current tiny lot. 2. Similarly, Tract A is being reduced in width from 121 feet to 81 feet. However, Tract B is being increased from 50 feet to 90 feet — a substantial increase that again improves the buildable area of Tract B. 3. The new lot line location makes the existing garage noncompliant by 7.2 feet (20 feet is required). This is an existing condition though — the garage remains in its current location. 4. The new home requires a 14 -foot variance for the side yard abutting Merry Lane (36 feet instead of 50 feet). Similar to the area issue in 1., above, this setback is similar to what would be required in the R -1C zoning district. The offsetting factor is that the three old cabins are as close as 16 feet from the right -of -way of Merry Lane — again, a significant improvement in zoning compliance. No doubt the most significant change that results from the applicants' plans has to do with the use of the property. Currently there are four dwellings on the two properties, three of which are questionable with respect to Building Code compliance. The applicants propose to reduce the number of dwellings to two, one for each lot, eliminating the nonconforming use. The new home, obviously, will comply with current Building Code requirements. -2- Memorandum Re: Lehman - Minor Subdivision/Variance and C.U.P. 28 May 2014 B. Alternative Remedies. Rezoning. As mentioned in the preceding, the subject property is located in the R -IA/S zoning district. In a couple of the issues raised above we mention R -1C zoning requirements. While properties farther to the east on Radisson Road are zoned R -1C, that zoning reflects the general lot sizes in that vicinity. Although the subject property and the neighboring lot to the east are smaller than what is required in the R -IA district, the vicinity in which they are located are predominantly larger lots. Consequently, changing the zoning classification in this case would constitute "spot zoning ", which is not legal or advisable. 2. Attrition. In the past, one way of dealing with nonconformities was to patiently wait for the offending use or structure to be removed by nature or by an owner wishing to do something where the City had some leverage to require conformity. The effectiveness of that method was unfortunately reduced by the State legislature in 2006, when laws were changed that not only protected nonconformities, but provided for their replacement. 3. Applicants' Case. The material submitted by the Applicants that is not included in this report cites various provisions in the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code that they feel support their case. For example, they reference what we call the "70 percent rule" whereby if a lot meets or exceeds 70 percent of the minimum width and area requirements for the zoning district, it is considered buildable. This may be worth noting, but it is intended for existing lots of record where the owner does not own adjoining property. What we refer to as the "average setback rule" does not apply in this case either, since the averages the applicants refer to are their own buildings. Structures on adjoining lots comply with R -lA setbacks. 4. Variances. This remains the only viable zoning tool for addressing the applicants' request, and for making the kind of code improvements listed herein. In light of the preceding comments, the reduction of dwelling units from four to two, one on each lot, is considered to be a reasonable use of the property. The proposed zoning corrections included in the proposal may never be achieved without the grant of the variances. Further, the proposed redevelopment of the property is more in keeping with the character of the neighborhood than if the old cabins were allowed to remain. Removal of the cabins "de- clutters" the property and the street on which it is located. Finally, the variances will not convey on the applicants a right denied to others. Anyone else willing to make the type of drastic zoning corrections proposed here, should be treated the same. The applicants have submitted a landscape plan (Exhibit G) that, in addition to providing for their own privacy, also somewhat mitigates the setback variance along Merry Lane. This plan should be incorporated into the resolution approving the request. -3- Memorandum Re: Lehman - Minor SubdivisionNariance and C.U.P. 28 May 2014 RECOMMENDATION Based on the preceding, it is recommended that the applicants' request for a minor subdivision, variances and a conditional use permit be granted subject to the following: 1. The applicants' surveyor must revise the survey of the newly configured lots to include the following: a. The small strip of land along the north end of the current westerly lot should be dedicated as public right -of -way. This was apparently left out when Radisson Road was improved several years ago. The travelled surfaced of the road extends into this part of the property. b. The survey is somewhat confusing showing Parcels 1, 2 and 3 (presumably existing), and Tracts A and B (presumably proposed). This should be clarified and Tracts A and B must be legally described. C. The survey must show drainage and utility easements, 10 feet around the perimeter of each of the new lots. Legal descriptions for the easements must also be provided. d. The survey should show the existing hardcover calculations for Tract A. 2. The applicants' attorney must prepare deeds for the aforementioned strip of right -of -way and the drainage and utility easements. 3. The applicants must submit an up -to -date (no more than 30 days) title opinion or title commitment for review by the City Attorney. 4. Items 1 - 3 must be submitted prior to this application being scheduled for City Council review, but not less than 30 days. 5. Once approved by the City Council, the applicants must record the rearrangement within 30 days. 6. Prior to release of the resolution approving the rearrangement, variances and conditional use permit, the applicants must provide a bid for the demolition of the small cabins and site restoration. From that bid, a letter of credit or cash escrow for one and one -half times the bid must be provided to guarantee the removal of the old cabins within 60 days. We have been advised by the applicants (too late for the upcoming public hearing) that they would like to live in one of the cabins while the new house is being built. This will require a separate conditional use permit that would allow them to keep one cabin until the new home is completed. 7. Since no additional lots are being created, there is no requirement for park dedication or local sanitary sewer access charges. 0 Memorandum Re: Lehman - Minor SubdivisionNariance and C.U.P. 28 May 2014 Upon recording of the minor subdivision, the applicants have one year to make use of the setback variance and conditional use permit. 9. The proposed landscape plan (Exhibit G) should be revised to include an inventory of existing trees, prior to any alteration of the site. The plan itself should be prepared by a landscape architect, or certified forester. If the landscaping is not completed by the time the new home is ready for occupancy, the applicants must provide a letter of credit for one and a half times the amount of the estimated cost of the landscaping. The estimate need not include the foundation plantings around the new house. Cc: Bill Joynes Tim Keane Peter and Marie Lehman Joe Pazandak -5- 0 a �1f A M M N C Cu Q U) I a a a O O �- N M N z O to ECD V O a a a a a a J LUIS a a a a .11 a a Exhibit A SITE LOCATION Lehman — Proposed Division, Variances and C.U.P. To: City of Shorewood Minnesota, City Planner, Planning Commission and City Council. From: Peter and Marie Leh man 21265 Radisson Road Shorewood, MN 55331 Subject: 1) Request for minors ubdivision/lot I ine revision and 2) Requestfor Conditional Use Permit a nd Va riances for new si nglefa mily home on revised I ot. Location: 1. 5625 Merry La ne 2. 5635 Merry La ne 3. 21265 Radisson Road (PID: 35-117-23-13-037)and 4. 21285 Radisson Road (PI D: 35- 117 -23 -13 -033) Date: May 5, 2014 Summary: We (Peter and Marie Lehman) would I ike to make better use of two adjacent I ots we own and would like to make these I otscompliant with the City ofShorewood's Comprehensive P Ian for the City, in partnership with the City. To meet this goaI,a minor subdivision/lot I inerevisionisrequestedwith a related request for a Conditional Use Permit and Variances to build anew home. 1) Request for lot line revision. As 28 yea r residents of the City of Shorewood, we respectfully request lot I ine revision for 2 a dj a centTorrens Title I ots of record we have owned for over 25 yea rs on Ra disson Road and Merry Lane. Our properties are unique and have gross non - conformities in their current state and we would like to bring them into better compliance with the City of Shorewood'sComprehensive Plan Update of 2009 by ma king them more equally sized at 24,848 sq. ft. and 21,410 sq. ft. 2) Request Conditional Use Permit and Variances for new single family home on revised lot. Subject to the approval of our minor subdivision /lotI ine revision by the city council,weare requesting the fol lowing conditional use permit and variances to build on the revised lot for 21285 Radisson Road: 1. Conditional Use Permitand Lot SizeVarianceto buildon a 21,410sq.ft. lot, 54%of the required 40,000 sq. ft. lotfor R1A. 2. Lot Width Varianceto build on a 90ft. wide lot, 75% of the 120 ft. lotwidth required for R1A. Exhibit B Lehman's Addition APPLICANTS' REQUEST LETTER 3. Road SetbackVariance of 35ft. from Merry Lanevs. the required 50ft. for RlA(3 existing homes currently only 20ft. from Merry Lane). Gross non - conformities of existing lots: Gross non - conformities currently i nclude: • 4 homes on 2 lots, • 3 homes 20ft. or less from Merry Lane (2 of which area Iso withinfrontand rearyard setbacks), • 3 homes I ess tha n the mi nimum required size of 30ft. x 22ft., a nd • a significantly substandard corner Iotof record entirely within the50ft. Merry Lane road setback attheSE cornerof Merry Lanea nd Radisson Road (21285 Radisson Rd). Proposed Improvements: The proposed improvements for the Merry Lane /Radisson Road properties would be: • a reduction in housing density from 4 homes to 2, • a reduction in structural setback violation from 2323 sq. ft. to 951 sq. ft. (60% reduction), • revi s ion of a grossly s ubstandard I of of record to a % acre I of (consistent with the City's comprehensive plan for I ow density housing), • the complete removal of the 3 substandard homes 20ft. or less from Merry Lane, • the construction of a single new home on the proposed I of 35 ft. from Merry Lane, • removal of 3 driveways and parkingfrom Merry Lane i nfavorof a single driveway off Radisson Roa d, a nd • remova I of 1 driveway currently within 20ft. from the Merry La ne /Radisson Road corner (40 ft. required by code) Itshoul d be noted thatthe short drivefrom Radisson Roadto the Christmas Lake Publicaccess will be beautified with all driveway /parkingremoval and the addition of trees and plantings on the east side (our revised lot). The new I a ndscapingwi II complementthe a I ready natural Christmas Shores Outlot - Aonthewestsidecreatingnatural corridorto the public access improving the sometimes congested trafficfI ow through the removal of the exi sting 3 driveways. lwo. 411,11117 M91 • the shoreland district hardcover requirementof 25% will be met, • City required utility and drainage easements will be added to the perimeter of both lots, and • The current house and detached garageat21265 Radisson Roadwill remain unchanged. Lehman's Addition Page 2 of 5 Wn Section 1201.05 of Shorewood Zoning Ordinance Conditions Governing Consideration of Minor Subdivision and Variance Request Subsection b. (1) Spec ial conditions and circumstances exist for the grosslysubstandard lot of record (Circa: 1940's) I ocated at 2 1285 Ra disson Road. The corner lot i s currently situated at the SE corner of Merry La ne a nd Ra disson Road. Being 50ft. wi de a nd 150ft. long corner lot, the entirety of the parcel is within the designated RlAsetback. The lotis7,500 sq.ft., 18.8%of the required 40,000 sq. ft. In addition to being within the setback, a nd grosslys u bstandard in size, the home located on this I of i s 20ft. wide by 30ft. I ong which is I ess than the minimum required for Shorewood of 22ft. wide by 30ft. long. (2) Literal interpretation of the provisions of this ordinance renderthis lot unbuildable by nature of it being a corner l of a nd grossly substandard in size. Other nearby lots of record are either larger, not s ituated on a corneror were revised into the R1C zoning district. (3) The special conditions and circumstances brought about by thegrosslysubstandardIotcame into existence i n the 1940's and were not created through any action of ours. (4) Given the unique circumstances surroundingthe number of homes on ourlots and the substandard nature of one of the lots, we do not bel ievethis request provides special privilege. We believe our request is in I ine with otherva riances granted, wherein density of homes is reduced through combining of I ots or removal of non - conforming dwellings that are consistent with the Shorewood Comprehensive Plan for housingdensity. Rationale for approval: Although variances are required for our proposed mi norsubdivision and subsequent new home construction, we have made a n effortto mi nimizethe number of variances required and we believe the goa Is defined in the City's Comprehensive Plan Update of 2009for Land Use in our neighborhood are being met i n at l ea st 2 i mportant a reas: • A reduction from Medium Density Residential (3 -6 units per acre) to Low Density Residential (1 -2 units per acre) [(Shorewood's Comprehensive Plan Update of 2009; Proposed Land Use map, pageLU -23] and • The preservation of existing taxable I ots [Shorewood's Comprehensive Plan Update of 2009; Genera I La n Use Policy 13, page LU -8,]. n addition, even thoughthe new lots wi II not meetthe R1A mi ni mum required I otsize of 40,000sq. ft. and lotwidthof 1 20ft., theywi I I both bewider and largerthanthe adjacent residential lot immediatelyto the east of the proposed minors ubdivision. This adjacent lot (21235 Radisson Road) Lehman's Addition Page 3 of 5 i R, of 17,184 sq.ft. and lot width of 65.5 ft. was granted a Conditional Use Permit and Variances to build a I a rge new home in 1999 (City of Shorewood Resolution No. 99 -037, Olson, 21235 Radisson Road). The number of requested variances required is 3: 1. Conditional Use Permitand Lot SizeVariancetobuildona 21,410sq. ft. lot, 54%of the required 40,000sq. ft. I otfor R1A. 2. Lot Width Variancetobuildona90ft . wide lot, 75 %of the 120 ft. lotwidth required for R1A. 3. Road SetbackVarianceof 35 ft. from Merry Lanevs. the required 50ft. for R1A(3 existing homes currently only 20ft. from Merry Lane). Code does allow for legal setbacks less than the normal minimum required fora given zoning district: Ordinance Section: 1201.03 General Provisions: Subd. 3, Yard Requirements. Subsection d: Where adjacent residential structures within the same block have front yard setbacks differen tfrom those required, the front yard minimum setback shall be the average of the adjacentstructures. If there is only one adjacentstructure, the front yard minimum setback shallbe the average of the required setback and the setback of the adjacent structure. In no case shall the req uiredfron tyard setback exceed that required minimum established within the districts of this chapter. Given that our 3 homes that comprise the'same bl ock' of Merry Lane from Ra disson Road to the Public access are 20ft. from Merry Lane, we bel i eve this section of the Ordinance could reasonably defi nethe currentsetback as 20ft. from Merry Lane. The more restrictive interpretation (average of 1 home and the 50ft. R1A requirement) would putthe setback at35ft. (our request). We acknowledge the factthat having these buildings removed priorto constructing the new home complicate the interpretation of the setback requirement, however, we be[ i eve that removing the 3 houses 20ft. from Merry Lane in favor of a single house 35ft. from Merry Lane (the more restrictive i nterpretati on) i s reasonable. Given thesefacts: • o u r c u r rent I ots h a ve gross n o n-co nfo rmities a n d • we a re wi I I i ng to ma ke th i s c ha nge a nd • our proposal is co nsistent wi th the City of Shorewood's Comprehensive Plan and • our proposal is co nsistent wi th theapproved conditional use per mitand variances of similar immediatelyadjacentsubstandard lot, we bel i eve our request meets the s pirit of the City's Comprehensive Plan, a nd a s best as possible, meets the City's Ordinances. For these reasons, we res pectfully requestthe Shorewood City Council to grant all 3 Variance Requests with the Conditional Use Permit. Lehman's Addition Page 4 of 5 B -4 More deta i Is and further discussion are contained i nthefol lowing pages of our request including maps of proposed changes, preliminary Registered Land Survey, proposed home concept drawings, el evati ons a nd I andscaping plan. Shorewood Proposed Land lJse Subject Property Lovi Density >� Residential (1 -2 units per acre) I 'wr m �s ty Red�•r_4 1 L"As O' etrs) * Donsity Re* ~ [4-2 Urft W 1kO*) 6*w to mock a Dwsdy Rts t (2 -3 ums ps* sue) M fftm E *" Rewdo *] t3 4 UrAs peg aa*J /t Lehmon's Addition Page 5 of 5 B -5 Lehman Minor Subdivision • Proposed Minor Subdivision via Hennepin County Registered Land Survey • Required Variances and Conditional Use Permit (R1A shore land) • Lehman Background • Existing Property Configuration (2 Parcels, 4 homes) 1. 5625 Merry Lane 2. 5635 Merry Lane 3. 21265 Radisson Road 4. 21285 Radisson Road • Shorewood Comprehensive Plan (relevant topics) • Proposed Property Configuration (2 Parcels, 2 homes) 1. 21265 Radisson Road 2. 21285 Radisson Road • Proposed building site and driveway — Hardcover calculations • Ordinance, Zoning Regulations and Variance Requests • Proposed home Lehman Background • Subject lots are existing lots of record (lot and homes circa 1940's) • Lehman's have lived on property since 1986 (28 years) — Married on property in 1988 — Raised 3 children here • Important Historical Events since residing on property — Christmas Lake Public Access added on south lot line — Brooks addition created 7 new residential lots (east) • Formerly Christmas Lake Motel (Bernice and Horton Brooks) — Hwy 7 expansion resulted in Lehman lot size reduction and decrease in Radisson Road setback for both lots of record — Christmas Shores development (west) created new residential lots on Merry Lane road extension • Formerly Interstudy Non- profit (Owner Dr. Paul Ellwood, from whom Lehman`s purchased subject properties). td Merry Lane setback Variance Request • Proposed 35 ft. setback does not meet 50 ft. R1A setback requirement — Ordinance does allow for new structures in certain blocks to be built within street setbacks (1201.03, Subd 3., Paragrand.). — Applying formula 1201.03,Subd 3., Paragrand.. to subject homes yields setbacks of: • 20 ft. setback usingthe average of all 3 subject homes on Merry Lane • 35 ft. setback using the average of 1 home (20ft.) and 50ft. Requirement. — The proposed structure could meet the setback requirement with the application of the ordinance (1201.03, Subd 3., Paragrah d.) with any of the exisiting homes on Merry Lane. The Lehman-'s proposal has the added benefit of removal of those structures used in the calculation. — Does meet 35 ft. setback allowed for R1C lots q� 4 4 Fl •( �� 'r : {: {:- L Xt 'XXOt::% XXX:: YG: %X w : %?:% r r`�F'� -�� "- {• x Xxxx X7 "]�•,.x ti- x%X• jgxx xxx +:x.,x - t %x JJ ',Y AX _ ,1� x. .. .s....... x Xxxx %% +t Xxxx Ceti XXX 'XXXXXXXX% X% %%% %%Xxxx}'?:%. XXX % % %% % %% c xxxxxxxx�:(xx. xxx x• {xxxxx Xx Xxxxx // 4 X%%XXX % % %7bXnK }. Y.xXXX SIOC%%%%%%%%XX% xX:.xxx::xxx i xxx. w :cxxx::xxx:: XXX••X q4 �J'P M xxxxXxxxx x%% {xK % X% 1 (� XXX XXX%% 1t %X ?:X. X %:{% %XXX% '•r ' {XXXXXX %X Y XXX%: XJfYXXXXXXXXiC {i ••%%x::Y.%%:: ..:'%%%"Xx}}(( R7CNX %X::XXX': %X j �1 ` — XXX %XY. % %% `f1M! \/ xxxxxx t + 3 %%XxXXX xxxxxxxxxxx ►; 4 _ xxx7(xKcx ""':Xxx Xxxx xxY.xx �r ly MX:'% % "XXX "X }: yy .%%X:;X%%: XXX: K%XX. X%%% XXkx •}tt X%%%%%% �L %% X % %x +ii•11 ,i = xxx x %x• xxx % #X x .xxxxx ,•� • v XX %X% X XXr j: X %Xx XX x::x xxx:,y�x%: %%. x % ..xxx:: 4, xxxxxx%X%x)t%XX x% 77 %% %XXX y t %%%%%%%%% Xx %X k% % XX 'r 1 t 'XXX % % %Xx%X%XX R XXX. %XXX X %X % %X% 9� ,!J `�� :Lx:.X%%" %�C X'lt XI:RXX" %::X% %::X %X::X .i. Q 14 i 1 •L_ _ XX X% %X707( %M %XXXX% %XX7tX % % % %X 4—J % %M X% XXX]CxX %XXXXXX %XXX % %x % %X 11 `' Ye y1+�• 7CRNX % %% X %X XXX %Y. %X % % % % %% % % % % % % % % %X% �. xxx::xx :XX :xxx::xxx: xxx::xxx::xxx::xxx::x 0 XXXXXXXX XXX %% %% %XXXXXXXXXN X %X XXXXXXXX XX % %% %Xxxx %X %X%XXXXXXXX X %X %XXX%7CXX Xx% XXX::xxxx%%%}1XXxX XXX XXXX % %% XX %XXXX % %XXXX%%%%%% % % % %X XX %XXX%% XX Y .XXX % % % % % % % % % % %X % %X 1 LLLiiiiii Xx% %X %XXX%% %X %X %XXX% ti X {t• %X %::X %% XXX XXY % Icy • '�. }:x X %%XXX %X} :'N %%XXXX%XXXX%XXX..X _ •.• : %%XXX%.\ ':: {XX%7�XX�XSX�XXY Y }} ::.: :Xxxx p% } >:`:: :wXxX , XXXY: i��locxx�C., :'rxxxri_ r 3c XXXX h: O : {xXXx ?:: }ixxxxxxxxxxiixxxxxx �.•.� KX: v. %V..XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXX. i G %XRXX %XXXXXX %XXXXXX :x7Pi:XXb •XXX': % %X:: %% %::XXX:: XXX::% ��ggxXXXxxx " iXXXXxxxxxxXXXX%% %X%%%% s i R71fOC %X% 7 XxXXX %X % %% %XXX % % % % % % %Xx o Xx %X % %XXh:..q 4n %% %XXXX % %% %XXXXXXXX %X % %% % %X.: % % %: % %X:: %XXX X %X:: % %X::X % %::X %X:: 1' • 1 °icXx .,•7cXxxxXxxY %% xxxxx %XXXX %x % % % % %% %XXXXXXXX% Y.•♦ "r 1%: %:• X %X %X %X% %X X % % %% %XXX % % % %% %%%XXX %XxXXX% V / - 'jam X •X; �:Xxn;t °.. xxxxx X% % % %X % %X %% %xxx %XXX %XXX %%XXXX ^' ' -, , :VR. X.:X:{' XXX::% X:'% %:•X X %': % %X: :XXx::X %%':%X %::X% %::XX 1. �f' e' �.��. r XXX?. :[? ?:Y XX %XXXX %X %xxxxxxXXxXxXXXxgxxxXxxxXxxxxx a �1--i .• N xxx :.x ::<XXXXXXX XXXX% %X XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXxXXXXXXX% %XXXXXX � v< G' T t� x,{M} .. '+w }:% X XXXXXX XXX XX % XXxXX7CXXXXXX7� % % % %K %XXX %X% %XXX 1 , N O (,� . •,•`; T? XX'{ '. xX:: X '•XX%::XX : %X :.. 7CX::%% X: : % % %:: % %X:: %X %:: % % %::XX %:: %7L %X T [v YL X% Y. XXX X %X %X %X %k 'v' %X % %%X %X %XXXXXXXX % %7C% %XXXX % %7C % %% r,SI P %% X..: % % % %X% %XXXX%%% XX XXX %X %%%XXX %% %XXXX %XXX%%XXXXXXXXX% ' 4 J k9iXX Xxxx% %XXX{ %X %X %X %% X% %XXXX% %%XXXXXXXX% %X %X % %XY. % %X ' %X %::x %': % % %::X % %: :XXY.•• XX:: XX•'X %X.: XXX : i X XXX 71%X X %XXX %XXXX %XXX X% XXX %XxXXX %XXNXXxxY.X% %XXX %X %X� % %. % X XXXX XKXR %S7mC% •• XX XXXXXXXXY.XXXXXXXx XXXXXX XX% A {� %% % XXX %X %X X XX %%% X% %XXXX % % % %X�(y�p�7iXXx %X h CLO (1) �Cxx %X71 \ v I X XX'• %:: %X %::XXX "X X %X::X% %':X1110:: %71 %:: % % %�: %%::xx "XXX.. '� X XXXX X XX 71XXXXXX'j XX XXXXXX% %X%%%%% 7t% ll:: k: %% %% 4 \ �►sxi l % % %XXX%%% XX XX%%XA X% % % % % %�X % % %XX� %X %XXh� R %Y% r �� O i�i1 P xxxxx % x 77i��{Y.XxXx. xx x XxxXX9 x XX 77LL'"'++CC7 y x7Lxxx7� •s `/v �y+� 71%%::%X7( %X %.. %X XXX "X % X7L 7X�.q% R %:: %% %':XXX ' • X X% X %XXXX %. ^C' x %X %X XXX R%% % %XXX%%%%%% %t- XXRX x% %% XX %XXXX %X %X X% % Rx7NLXX %X% %X %XXXX% •'J %XlX xxx % %x . ?:XXXX% y }� xx %xx7i %xxxxxx %xxxxx j� y r R':% XX:: Y. %" XX.' 't. A. .%X::X. %M9%%.. X::XXX" xxx::% ' w O Y XXX XXX •{ %% %XXXXK.* jbMY% X % % %X%�XX %XXX % % %% {.I v —, xxx X7c X . x xxxxx �:X . vxX%7 WJX?Cx xxxxxxxx J; ` M. 7C -� Xxxx. YX.. .vX%% %YX %X %X% \:: .. X' r •y y -� - :x XX:ix ]SY:' %::K % %:: %7C %: Y %X:•X - !� %K Y.X . i %7:v?A@: x7:X %X%7: %XXXXXX.' x%X • Y 1 /�'� T� YX• X%% I+'{ �: { Y •`XX % % % % %% ?:XXXX X%%3777iiiiX w %XXX 'i•YK V. %X%% %X%% %X% %XXX }! I �= .x i•, -4 •: .:• x::xxx:::{xx::x% w `:.+. { "�F'y r` },x %%%XXXXXX {f 'f t..`F't • y V, �j }t XXXXXX% x CHRISTMAS LA KR %rir.,- 1r," of ClsAllr*% Upp 4 \��` „i �•i!at !%ld lcc7iod -� .� ,aA 54'4} i -z. ,1, "'•�, Srri'+,1'r�'� �YL i'i'�r�� 4 ��',.� tti'7t1Y � 73P,] •i•►T fN�,1F1�1J N. W 1' 4� Exhibit C ,. r; F?'ET ; EXISTING LOTS Pt 8► p Vh i*r, h•?rr --r. -re lo 4 i ii 'To ?: °„ Lk,,; ry c.m'.i¢ Lr rairlte _zoltarr NAVU,, -'14Ri � XX 00 1' A X XX XX 'v XXXXX XXXX XX RX XX 0 b.. X XX XX rill WX v-, X XX X XX ..NXXXX XXmX XX XX ii O X X X % XXN.XXXNIIX.N. XHNXXXXHXXXX XXm- XX XXmXXX 4,1( XX N. XXNXXXNX X XX M. XX XXXNX.XNXN 4 to ;?7'4f XR XX VXX` X mXX X H NN V X X r NX �X. X X"XXXI X XXX 7, 1 , XmXXX •XX X X 1l—d L. 11 XXXXMX X z X XxNgxx X XX X XX* X MXXXXM XX X. N X XX N XXXX XXXXX NXmXXmXXXX XXXN.XXXXNXX 0 X X XXN XX xmxxmxxmx X XX XX X XX XXXXXXNXXNXXHXX XX NX % NNN Ux X X NX XXRX XX XX XN z NXX XX N XX ' XX Ix 0 XX NX XX M ) XXX X V Xxx NIX 'N.4 XX XMINN ."XXX mXX f. IN FEET D4-yrg,o slr.rr hv,r n 7,, W,*J ••r ltA L. Cc,ontw Crxrdrott '.,y-ferr NA063 ti19943 Ad,.Ll. 0 U clC 4-j '� R TMA S XX NX NN Xn X. 11.1 XN XX O .. ... .. WMENNI.M XXX NX XX m.XXN INXM X X M V, NN INA X. 0 3 It*, (NAV7M) N�* XX..X 4 00 X&MINNIM&N, M, X t C,to -s S XX NX XX XX muso X XXm XMXX.,XXXX . X. XX mXX < N M. .1 XX NX . NX M X mm� ko- XXz <XX.I. XX %XXm X OXNX XX M NX xx XX NX NX X XX X N XMMM XXX X X V) XmXX x. NXN- XX XX M XX XX TRAC X NX mmmmxmx.lc N'..NVEMNA., XX XX NX NX XX XX XX 21,41;D ttr XXXXXXXXXXXXXXII.XMN, X X L•� 7. .9 X X XXX X % . ON N Xk"."m x X X PROPOSED LOTS O 111 XOXXX : %:•: %' ., X XX "M % NX K X 4 X 'Nx'x'N'x •'Irp, X X 06 Z X XX X XXXNIXIXXNxx3x - cm XX X X XNXXIXINX XX 411.1m ...N"XVXXX XX X X XX Xg. X XX XX XX XX XX XXmX-X-mXXXX XXX XXX XH IXIXXNNXXXNXXNXXX krj MXXmXXmXX %9 X'} XX xx X YY MX X f. IN FEET D4-yrg,o slr.rr hv,r n 7,, W,*J ••r ltA L. Cc,ontw Crxrdrott '.,y-ferr NA063 ti19943 Ad,.Ll. 0 U clC '� R TMA S hA KE 3 It*, (NAV7M) 4 00 C,to -s S 00 N Exhibit D F PROPOSED LOTS •o qL XX X X X XXX _b ::X =XX. X —J't. X V.. X.. X XX A r 4y Vol 4.1( �22'27-49`0 44, XXXXMXXXXX� XXXXXXXX % X. XkX .............. X X X. ' , m X X H X, X, Y�R X X XX RX Xx XX; xxx xxxx}i ,c XXXX� X I XXXX" A f 7. 'CP l. "c XX I .. XXX XXXX Y 4� <xx�Evyxxxm 0 S XXXMXXXX. XHXXX�x X% XXX NX C:: .X X%l ,XXX , XXXXXIIX cXXXXXXX XXXXM. �XX:== X::Xxx::x (V) D O'^ lXXXXXXXXNXXXXXX XX 4 XX XXXXXXXXXXXXX XXX n L Ln 4XX::XX XX XX XXXXXX XXXXX I XXXXXXXXX M 0 _0 XXXX XXX cx • .. I X::xxx::Xxx: S X K XXXXXXXXXXXX t. XXXXXX X x X XXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXX ""XXXXi" ::XXXH V X::XX XUCHUX XX MXXXXXXX "e mXXXXXXXXXXX C- 0 Ln O Ln . X E LU E 0 of A!0r%kl-Y% L*- 0 -r = r,4 rq 44, XXXXMXXXXX� XXXXXXXX % X. XkX .............. X X X. ' , m X X H X, X, Y�R X X XX RX Xx XX; xxx xxxx}i ,c XXXX� X I XXXX" A f 7. 'CP l. "c XX I .. XXX XXXX Y 4� <xx�Evyxxxm XX S XXXMXXXX. XHXXX�x X% XXX NX C:: .X X%l ,XXX , XXXXXIIX cXXXXXXX XXXXM. �XX:== X::Xxx::x X. X X. , :lx XXX XNX XXXXXXC. rF Air lXXXXXXXXNXXXXXX XX 4 XX XXXXXXXXXXXXX XXX 4XX::XX XX XX XXXXXX XXXXX I XXXXXXXXX M E H.IX'.1. XXX:1 " XXXX X XXXX XXX cx • .. I X::xxx::Xxx: S X K XXXXXXXXXXXX t. XXXXXX X x X XXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXX ""XXXXi" ::XXXH V X::XX XUCHUX XX MXXXXXXX "e mXXXXXXXXXXX H XXIIXXXIIX XXXXy*X CHRI."MAS X LAKE of A!0r%kl-Y% L*- X XX I .......... C ],,,, FEET ) Pevirg's sfa-r- h�rrrr, To Cc,crdr3te ':yIferr NAIR43 1!RM, 'kd-*o- X Exhibit E EXISTING DWELLINGS l. "c XX I .. XXX XXXX Y 4� <xx�Evyxxxm S XXXMXXXX. XHXXX�x X% XXX NX C:: X%l ,XXX , XXXXXIIX cXXXXXXX XXXXM. �XX:== X::Xxx::x , :lx XXX XNX XXXXXXC. rF Air lXXXXXXXXNXXXXXX XX 4 XX XXXXXXXXXXXXX XXX 4XX::XX XX XX XXXXXX XXXXX I XXXXXXXXX M E H.IX'.1. XXX:1 " XXXX X C. RE XX XXXXXX4 c X XX XX XX cx • .. I X::xxx::Xxx: S X K XXXXXXXXXXXX t. XXXXXX X x X XXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXX ""XXXXi" ::XXXH nt 0 S.-HUHH" X -X X. X X XXXX X X::XX XUCHUX XX MXXXXXXX "e mXXXXXXXXXXX H XXIIXXXIIX XXXXy*X CHRI."MAS LAKE of A!0r%kl-Y% L*- C ],,,, FEET ) Pevirg's sfa-r- h�rrrr, To Cc,crdr3te ':yIferr NAIR43 1!RM, 'kd-*o- X Exhibit E EXISTING DWELLINGS 0` k-X IP 00 r V by .p s Id " - 15 M i 'i 1! ° '21'1 7'4 X X 4-j Gn- 0 .. . ............. ... .. .......... . TRACT A ... NA, u =3 c :7.:: :X: ............ . I_lx:::::: X::: F.- i 1,.: i i i ,�, -.. .-Ir > ...... ... .. . .. . ... .. ....... ...... ....... ..... u E t 1A ,0 CHRISTMAS LA KE sA*rc-. lei* ol 4,1hWas Ldi-e v' 10111 k .21 $!jr A ' wvqf , -e wl J�V/XDI 4 .......... ------- ----- ------------------------ - 932 3 *6#1 a m 8 R w "g r14 0 m 00 N Lm w L6 0 GJ 0 Ul U) 07 Ln 0 > 'c c!] L 14 4-1 M m g Ln co c 0 Lr) > N U (Z 0 ��j u > N 0 L) < 4� u -0 Ln 4- = 14 CL w (A =3 V) co CL 2 0 a S � 8 R w w r14 m m 00 GJ 0 > 'c c!] L 14 4-1 M m g :. N Exhibit F PROPOSED NEW HOME LOCATION Ir 0 ru ui I tp z T W I w P--4 ct� < CL UJ z 0 u > 0 L) Z LA w - 61 Iii ry CL la nA-rr- 15/4/2014 Exhibit G DID CUD" Q U n LANDSCAPE 131- A XT -r CT 3NVI A2W31/\! WmN0000r) b.0 uj OJ LU tlo 0 .......... -0 _0 U m 4-J 0 N 4-J -i rj o CU o a ro V) 0 00 4-J > C14 _0 LU Ln 0 0 rk,4 E N tri of - . ............ Lr) 1 -r CT 3NVI A2W31/\! O�l NOSS I (MJ '401 m I'Tull.r- D� It c - I0 z z T w -i w P-4 uj Irk- V) z LZI Z LU LLI fj) uu err I rF a yid DATE 15/412014 ------------------- SCALEt G-2, WmN0000r) b.0 uj LU .......... U N -i rj o o o a ro Qj 0 E N of Lr) 1 1 1 -1 4- < � ry) r-f r-i 0 1 0 0:: 0 0 0 co co > Q) Q) r-i (L) . r14 Q) bD (1) > w = V) < C) 0 Q-10 4Ml -a M cn 0 O�l NOSS I (MJ '401 m I'Tull.r- D� It c - I0 z z T w -i w P-4 uj Irk- V) z LZI Z LU LLI fj) uu err I rF a yid DATE 15/412014 ------------------- SCALEt G-2, uj LU .......... O�l NOSS I (MJ '401 m I'Tull.r- D� It c - I0 z z T w -i w P-4 uj Irk- V) z LZI Z LU LLI fj) uu err I rF a yid DATE 15/412014 ------------------- SCALEt G-2, �b ,.d c z r APPLIED INNOVATIONS PETER & MARIE LEHMAN � O I PRELIMINARY ° RESEARCH LLC SOUTHEAST VIEW G 's DR. Ati47N G. SPP0V1ElEr -° _ FRO)E(7 CE=CIPIPnrAI SAEETTME: '" n -„ ,APPLIED INNOVATIONS PETER & MARIE LEHMAN RESEARCH LLB. PRELIMINARY SOUTH QUEST VIEW x N w x .p �71 r O Tin View from Public Access APPLIED INNOVATIONS, RESEARCH LLC I 'z -E= 7 1 TLE PRELIMINARY SOUTH ELEVATION View from 21235 Radisson (i.e. East Neiahbor) Ruclu APPLIED INNOVATIONS RESEARCH LLC Fp-ml L"I PETER & MARIE LEHMAN ,-� w = E7 77 L:,: i PRELIMINARY EAST ELEVATION M IY-4 View from Radisson Road/Highway 7 ca > APPLIED INNOVATIONS RESEARCH LLC In PEWR&IWIARIE LEH MAN �H�!F7 77- PRELIMINARY NORTH ELEVATION APPLIED INNOVATIONS RESEARCH LLC In PEWR&IWIARIE LEH MAN �H�!F7 77- PRELIMINARY NORTH ELEVATION JS J -2 Brad Nielsen From: Ken Hendrickson [keneh37 @gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, June 01, 2014 7:15 PM To: Brad Nielsen Cc: Peter Lehman; dwoodruf @ix.netcom.com; Scott Zerby Subject: Proposal by Peter and Marie Lehman, 21265 Radisson Rd Dear Brad You may remember me, I served as Shorewood's representative to the LMCC froml /31/10 thru 1/31/13. We live at 21125 Radisson Rd, 3 houses down from Peter and Marie Lehman I am writing to express our support for their request of a Lot Line Rearrangement, Variances, and a Conditional Use Permit. We have read the proposal and reviewed the maps with Peter and strongly support the proposal. We believe that it will improve the neighborhood. Sincerely, Ken and Helen Hendrickson 1 Brad Nielsen From: Minnetonkamuskie . [ minnetonkamuskie@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, June 02, 2014 11:27 PM To: Brad Nielsen Cc: peterlehman @gmail.com Subject: Lehman Minor Subdivision /Combination C.U.P. and Variance Hi Brad, I wanted to share my input with you on Pete and Marie Lehman's proposed lot changes, being I'm the next door neighbor. In reviewing the plans for the lot line change and the purposed new home, I believe the changes help the neighborhood, and I am in favor of them. The lot line change makes sense and the new home is a good fit for the community. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me. Thanks, Scott Olson 21235 Radisson Road Shorewood, MN 55331 (612) 483 -9875 Memorandum Re: Northern States Power (aka Xcel Energy) C.U.P. 29 May 2014 contain 4264 square feet. Elevations of the proposed buildings are shown on Exhibit D. The larger, southerly building will be 26 feet in height, while the northerly structure will be 21 feet high. The buildings will be constructed using the same materials as the existing accessory structures on the property. The purpose of the two new buildings is to house vehicles and equipment that are currently kept outside in the storage yard. ANALYSIS/RECOMMENDATION A. Section 1201.22 Subd. 4.e. of the Shorewood Zoning Code sets forth four criteria for the type of use being proposed. Following is how the proposed improvements comply with the Code: The Service Center has historically been compatible with nearby residential activities (primarily to the west of County Road 19). With respect to building setbacks, the proposed buildings comply with C -1 standards. For example, the minimum front setback is 30 feet. The proposed buildings are 108 feet and 203 feet back from the front property line. The northerly building is 20.8 feet from the side lot line, where only 15 is required. 2. Outdoor storage of vehicles and equipment is entirely enclosed by a fence. Note, there are separate provisions in Subd. 41 for open and outdoor storage (to be addressed further on in this report). 3. Additional screening and landscaping is provided adjacent to residential uses. This is where the existing facility and the proposed plans are somewhat lacking. Although the existing site plan on Exhibit B shows some sort of vegetation along the west side of the existing parking lot, outside the fence, this appears to be somewhat nonexistent and parking and storage of equipment is quite visible from County Road 19 and from the residential properties to the west. It is strongly recommended that the applicant have a professional landscape plan prepared addressing this item. Proposed landscaping should include trees and shrubbery that provide winter as well as summer interest. 4. The proposed use of the site is consistent with the Shorewood Comprehensive Plan and with the C -1 zoning of the property. B. Section 1201.22 Subd. 41 of the Zoning Code provides for open and outdoor storage as an accessory use in the C -1 District. 1. Outdoor storage does not take up more than 30 percent of the site area and it occupies less area than the first floor of the principal building. In this regard, the proposed buildings actually improve the site by providing indoor space for much of the equipment storage. -2- Memorandum Re: Northern States Power (aka Xcel Energy) C.U.P. 29 May 2014 2. Fencing and screening are addressed in A. 3., above. 3. Screening from the public right -of -way is addressed in A.3. as well. 4. Storage areas are surfaced to control dust. 5. Landscaping is addressed in A.3. 6. Proposed lighting plans are shown in Exhibit F, attached. Two of the existing pole fixtures on the site will be replaced by wall- mounted units on the southerly building. The plans on Exhibit F -2 show downcast fixtures and the photometric plans indicate that the light levels will be well within the Zoning Code standards of .4 foot - candles at the property line. 7. Parking for the site is considered to be adequate and the proposed buildings are not taking up existing parking areas. It is recommended that the conditional use permit for Northern States Power Company be granted subject to the applicant submitting a landscape plan addressing the issues raised herein and subject to the City Engineer's recommendations which are addressed under separate cover. The landscape plan need not hold up the applicant's plans, which are scheduled for review at the 23 June City Council meeting. The landscape plan should be submitted by 23 June, in order that it be available for the Planning Commission's review at its 1 July meeting. If the approved landscaping is not completed before the buildings are ready for occupancy, a letter of credit or cash escrow should be required to guarantee completion within a specified period of time. Cc: Bill Joynes Tim Keane Paul Hornby Larry Brown David Franke Brian Fitzgerald -3- z� xr� C O� m� � O O 0 O "Im, C U Minnetonka Country Club N A 0 300 600 1,200 Feet Subject Property W nt x l A. i I + LEGAL DESCRIPTION: XCEL ENERGY The following legal description is as shown an First American Title Insurance Company \ \ I Commitment File No. NCS- 56330 -MPLS with an commitment date of September 13, 2010. S H O REWOO D \ \ Parcel A: - -y Lot 5, AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NUMBER 133, except that part thereof that Iles southerly of the MINNESOTA following described line: Beginning at a point of the east line of said Lot 5, distant 518.85 feet yo° \ nAacEO — -- I south of the northeast corner thereof; thence southwesterly, deflecting 36 degrees 30 minutes, measured from South to West a distance of 144.46 feet; thence wester) deflecting 27de r es 00 F H Ra' D -' w E0.M — — — —J Y 9 g e SERVICE CENTER " cone tie -N88 °07,43 fY L ° o - • r ... „ , I _ — _ minutes, a distance of 34.65 feet, more of less, to the northeaster) line of County Road No. 19 --- 738.66 a+caw,• :?" Y tv v --- s - --,�, s*yva.__ _- � '•• ,/, ;•, �,;;, _ and there terminating. (Abstract) +9" , evcnTu- —q`,1 > �— _ _ -�'i' "..� � �NORiirr STS acxws 9 wcw Fae-e .. r /r; Parcel B: c Ny ° (D�ANGO.- ovNAl.�. r _ NCS- 456330 -MPLS � That part of the North Half of [he Northeast Quarter of Section 33, Township 117 North, Range '�� - -. 4_0_ '46 "cb'� - = a3e= - = —r - -�_ 23 West of the Fifth Principal Mer(dlan, hounded and described as follows; Beginning at the _ e i xxsug _- 9s,zG- �` -.$_�- .. o.+ x. - --_y a 9 9 _z;;%. ___ _ northeast corner of the following described tract: The West 200 fee[, measured at right angles to 0 _ __ —P/ tt�-�. _ _�_-_ _ _ — -� -= = ° _ the west line, of that pare afTmct A, Registered Land Survey Na. 482, lying northerly of a Ilse CONTACT: > i— I I T 1 T }-- xysss "s' _ rc �: - _ _ °6 rawn easterly from a point on the west line of said Tract A, said paint being T 00 feet southerly I , , I , .� 1 of the northwest corner of said Tract A. to a point an the east line of said West 200 feet, distant 19�° I r ! -O�` 's - `_iw `- �;r� 6, + °'a 100 feet southerly of the northeast corner of said west 200 feet; thence northerly along the \ i + ---- _��. �--� -- Judy Knight s norther) extension of the easterly line ofthe above described tract to a point distant 25 Leer 0 -w a i'ib _„/` I x arL,x+ass sarFAn: `' -•) - - �-'{- i--j - + - -•• b --? s °s> =,c -_ v -'`�' °i0. southerly, measured radially, from the center line of the main track of the Chicago and XCeI Energy 5 PPP , COa"Ea oP raper A, _ .� _� =�`=,r 9° Northwestern Transportation Company (formerly the Minneapolis and St. Louis Railway 414 NieDllet Mall Mezzanine C°NR Lf ! 4 r +ji0 54�` -\ .. - :� 'rca ? - • . ' , - _ -__ Lot son ,sue W.-g' / - -'�-� 4 Company), as said main track is now located; thence westerly parallel and 25 feet southerly of P \ _ wW Minnea Dlis, MN 55401 CALL o-f,� A' .,`_LSEE BgR,bTav Nore \ �- �6 said main [rack centerline to the easterl line of Henne Tn Coun HI hwa No. 19; thence -eaz + °`9' +' ) / - 6u°'x.''r =ea. - +''Y Y P h 9 Y ,� d °' e" -� ,* nss ivTV-`� southerly along the easterly line of said County Highway to an iron monument on the easterl Phone: 612.330.2997 g Y 1. 4 \ ZON O.• - -� caaNEa WEST I rRacr a, RLS raD. line of said County Highway, distant 50 feet southerly, measure at right angles, from the center Fax: 612.330.7856 + �� f - \, + _� � NK4 SAY i-- F�LO°R Eiw: ' line of said main track; thence Easter) along the souther) right ofwa fine of the said Chicago ° ` 1 ( sew x Lmur : y 1 '•" 97a A EXfsYpdc„ ,•,••,,, _ v 9 Y Y 9 Judy.l.knight@xcelenergy.com ��•'_44) - -. -- _ - t _ EA9EYENr PER , 4N \'v r/ " " "'rr,,, _ �e s sr-DWC / cl II and North Western Transportation Company to aJudicial Land Monument located at the q46 5 -I DOG. NO. 783858 O \�`5,�.. N°4+1 ,�` - northwesterly comer of Tract A, Registered Land Survey No 482; thence easterly along the � ' / / 9 ri60ri,,.,iiii,iiiirriiii �1 F{ �.. —` LL ' , ° „ "'� i `�1J�9 northerly line of said Tract A to the point of beginning. (Abstract). COUNTY: '4 WnRFI0,X 91FFaCF + f -\ �` -`096 /r -\ \_,. - $ �\ PAR(�EL C ' Parcel C; 'J o° + •cH°N reke, o , y �1.'�.1n, +o p9 ,t I'i 6p �*aqe q.^° The West 200 feet, measured at right angles to the West line, of that part of Tract A, Registered H E N N E P I IV ,yo' c', y�. -w4, Ex ca g " Land Survey No. 482, County of Hennepin, lying Northerly of a line drawn Easterly from a point C O U N TY \ 9 _ 9` °° + on the West line of said Tract A, said point being 700 feet Southerly of the Northwest comer of \ +' * 9• - -�9 }"' +- -_ -- , j __ ,a - 7.� + RPt 9499 °A1'��Rxb �+� said Tract A, to a point on the East line of said West 200 feet, distant 100 feet Souther) of the 9 - -.� — +? NY -939.0 ➢a pa Y - r �.� q.,, \� (PLANT ?D 9 ' #', , Fes, 9 s� Northeast corner of said West 200 feet (Forrens) Re 6 t ,� \ 6 N Y\ 3• I <r r -Z.� . ,•43I °�'n s. f,- —0 .�-.. eLL.I, s v , �..._ �- 1 c 4999, EASEMENT NOTES: °9 --- +q °g```� -/ �- First American T[Ie Insurance Company Commitment File No- NCS- 455330 -MPLS with an f y v \ I y - �wa �s + a 45y 2.53 l commitment date of September 13,2010 was relied on for matters of record. � \ 91E ,o , 1 4y , a _ .s + °•_ g 3 . t ' +9`9' + _ qP_ _ ++ ZONED.- C d i �,. g9° , 1 , ' +° °l, + 13. Sub J e ct to Easements for sewer and utility purposes per Doc. No. 783858. Shown graphically. '0 a9Z SHOREWOO - \ Mr. Pete Owens of the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (3565 Kennebec Drive, REVISIONS: < t I Eagan, MN 55122, Phone: 651.602.4535, Fax: 651.602.4533, E: $ ,C r ' Z• \ s \ `ye ,. \ t o ,6' I _ °y ' - -- � Osr -1 <w3 - pete.owens@me[cstate . mn.us) responded to our Gopher One locate call with the following DATE REVISION A a °'' email message: 03 -07 -14 INITIAL ISSUE ....951... � 5 h ?' � non �'E ~� I a predecessor agency of the Met Council took ownership and operations of a lift station, + _ s5 `�' -�, sLaF FLL000z°ELe Iz i FM, and gravity sewer built in 1964 by the city of Tonka Bay In your area of Interest. The lift F\ \ $y. - \J vosselt \ ' `; LT- -- , \.'� station and FM were abandoned In 1971 when a new system was built, sewage is now VICINITY MAP: \ '[< + I' D *� ( ea Kww _:oe ✓ conveyed along our 7017 pipe along the Henn Cc reg. rr property.An easement covering your area of Interest Is attached. Since we no longer use the pipe the easement should no longer be \ ,a - - -- 20o' - -� necessary. If you need a release of the portion of the easement across the Xcel roe let me 517E Ie"PW COUNTY REGIONAL RR \ :�� 6 o5ci ' % 4,94 -ALE 9° �Tt -^^ L ON property rtY e cow 9i� h x \\ Sgt ''` know.' \'• �\ ' 649` CALL (+ \ ' + FLOOR \ �\ ,q„fB +s'y0a'p „ • pvc - - Lz I- +9y ;• 14. Easement Agreement per Doc. No, 3577174 does not affect the subject property. TOWA BAY o \9 ,3`.b m + ..a. .CN.W tettNxt 6 =iD d'' ! fi 3 t SCALE: sNOaew000 ®z \ :,'F �, N�,o m a / 15'ys? 9+` , Ex. rW , FEZ +�y y, ; , 15. Easement Agreement, retarded as Doc. No. 3991089 does not affect the subject property. fig,, Shown graphically. \\\ `• � ; + ,,; 31�° ° % ¢P° TaAirc� r• BL� FLOG ELEV1 ' 1 1 G. Subject to Terms and conditions of the Deed recorded as Doc No. 4107959. Not shown - sfrTNTawH ROAD '` �' - `20a I' ' o r x affects all of Parcel B. CRY OF SNOREWOOD \ �� Cy `- -FLOOR ELEV. y _ HENNEPIN COUW ,, \•'\ \ ALU4L 4'9'm c =959.4 $ \ ° 9 ,<xf + I, V t @t q , 17. Subject to Right of way for County Road 19 as presently laid out and traveled, and as contained MINNESOTA r. +99`' 4P ? 1' In Hennepin County Stale Aid Highway No. 19, Plat 57 -Doc No. 5036475. Shown ra hlcall 2zo o'ae 9 ( -'- 9 P y. NORTH SEC 33, TWA. 117N, RAG. 23W ° ,e - 1 -5i s " 3 XISTWG BUILDING �� u32 sosr. As se°WN , -� 18. Subject to Railroad right afway, as shown on Hennepin County Regional Railroad Authority 0 40 80 A< ° T 1 F y c . 1 Property Map No, 1, per Doc. No, 5404251. Shown graphically. ns , q ( I� ,4 a w 19. Subject to Declaration per Doc. No. 9318998 and 4614525. Not shown - covers entire property \ Q\ q V1i ° area. P. L , �Nm CERTIFICATION: CALL BEFORE YOU DIG[ _.let ,,, I � � r' r PROJECT LOCATION: LE` u ' l-a"RgRgy,,, -; ' y,° - 15 "I 1 q I 1\ , ;S v"� 1 hereby certify to XCEL ENERGY, and Old Republic National Title Insurance Company and to $ Go) her State One Call G� / �': -p ��'q F '• p - " i o +° ' art 21U i their participants, helm, successors and assigns, that this map or plat and the survey on which It TsrE!2 i j 5 5 0 5 °\y is based were made in accordance with'Mlnlmum Standard Detail Requirements for ALTA /ACSM V TWIN CITY AREA: 651-454 -8002 Land Title Surve s i - \ \y i + ! 9 ? I9 tF y 1 , r • ` -' , Y Jointly established and adapted of ALTA, and o the In Accuracy and Includes TOLL FREE: 1 -880- 252 -7166 - 2� ' °� s + mue+ar,'suu "� 9�I, _ , r Items d y 3, 4, a 10, 11 b, and 14 a Table A thereof. Pursuant c the , the u cd undersigned as MAN ITO U ROAD ,9, 4+ wares hr K s i' I I adopted by ALTA and NSPS and In effect on the date of this certfFlcation, the undersigned p , d SERE A5, ° / k{ ya further certifies that in my professional opinion, as a Land Surveyor registered in the State of 4LL:a , -,1 'AN, ;M �npAIROS , t,9 0 Minnesota that the Relative Positional Accuracy of this survey does not exceed that which is UNDERGROUND UTILITY NOTES specl8edtherein. Q CORNERSTONE LAND SURVEYING, INC. t.LD. #3311723120080 Dated: 11 -12 -2010, Revised: 03 -07 -14 (topography) P.LD. #3311723110045 THE UNDERGROUND UTILTIES SHOWN HAVE BEEN LOCATED Np _ 9 °? Iu I - - 1 se . FROM FIELD SURVEY INFORMATION AND EXISTING DRAWINGS. U ,c +° THE SURVEYOR MAKES NO GUARANTEE THAT THE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN COMPROMISE ALL SUCH UTILITIES IN THE AREA, - _o� - -\ I I. v I o ^ ' ' EITHER IN SERVICE OR ABANDONED. THE SURVEYOR FURTHER a R 9 ? yyo Eocf sdow Pat f y ,° \qsy fi y aniel L. Thurmes $ DOES NOT WARRANT THAT THE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN °dr Minnesota License No. 25718 ARE IN THE EXACT LOCATION INDICATED ALTHOUGH HE DOES \ 9 R' m t. - First American Title Insurance Company Commitment File No. NCS-45 633 0-MPLS with an CERTIFY THAT THEY ARE LOCATED AS ACCURATELY AS POSSIBLE \ i y_ / Suite #B1o0 FROM THE INFORMATION AVAILABLE. MOST UTILITIES ARE mi , 9 9;:" -� 1 . ` — — — — — — — — — — commitment date of September 13 was relied on for matters of record. Other easements may 200E st Chestnut Street yh". :�... " :. "',4 a*zb � � ; ;:.:*y` �, _ � � / /// — � exist that were not shown in this commitment and are not shown on this survey. Stillwater, MN 35082 SHOWN BASED ON MARKING LEFT 51 THE GROUND IN RESPONSE \ y ry _ NO DIGGERS HOTLINE OCATED T E UNDERGROUND THIS SURVEY HAS `� - \ °s+% r +�$, / // Phone 651276.8989 NOT PHYSI L UTILITIES LOCATED OF WHICH IN ERGROUND UTILRI6. \ \ SE ' D STS S\ .169�_J° 'T6J0 "Lr-- / /// I BOUNDARY NOTE: Fax 63,.273.89796 ADDITIONAL UTILITIES OF WHICH WE ARE UNAWARE MAY EXIST. \ 5�1a9 O•�6 , ` I .3�� / 'yv° I dan@casurvey 'y%'g j /// L — — — T14EWESMLYUNEOF ILLS NO.482 IS DELINEATED BYJUDICIAL LANDMARKS SET AT THE NW net 5kU69',0/ / CORNER OF TRACT A AND ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID TRACT A. THESE MONUMENTS NO 9 / / LONGER EXIST AND SHOULD BE PLACED PURSUANT TO A COURT ORDER. DISTANCES AS LEGEND: ah ^ U �c°o X99 / / SHOWN ON AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO. 133 PLACE THE WESTERLY LINE OF ILLS NO 482 ,I"/ N. dP /}' APPROXIMATELY 19 FEET EASTERLY THAN AS SHOWN. THE EAST LINE OF LOT 5, AUDITOR'S J ,(� SUBDIVISION NO. 133 AND THE WEST LINE OF TRACT A, RLS NO. 482 AS SHOWN ON THIS O \ P ¢ e / /T' /� SURVEY ARE THE SAME AS THE WEST LINE OF GOVERNMENT LOT I, SECTION 33, T17, R23. 0 TEIE /ELEC BOX y,,i •- `+'J �- DENOTESIRONMONUMENTSLT ° \ / CAS VALVE METER e ° / �1 ! EXISTING PARKING CORNERSTONE OFIJOTFS FOUND a a GAS VALVE / \ °i ' 959 ' yy 4 v / �/ / MONUMENT AS MARKED ---- .._'.R..- ..._ELECTRIC UNE \ _ $+ / i/ / $ AREA: i- l TOTAL REGULARSTRIPPED PARKINGSTALL 5 =55 L.AN� SURVEYING, INC WELL -TELEPHONE LINE \ P5,9 �I'' b9 g4•N jj �,"� TOTAL HANDICAP STRIPPED PARKING STALLS =1 } TOTAL AREA OF PARCEL AS SHOWN: ° y P 0 , S TOTAL NON STANDARD STRIPPED PARKING STALLS = 19 AREA = 245,173 SO FT, / 5.63 ACRES tYA WATER VALVES -. —FIBER OPTIC LINE � 9 e �' 4 �,yy __. .. K HYDRANT - �WATER LINE \ o It ' ^ ', as CATCH BASIN /STORM MH —STORM SEWER LINE' < -- SANARYSEYERNE p CULVERTIF.E.S. \ FLOOD INFORMATION SURVEY NOTES: 0 SANITARY MANHOLE —• -- -FENCE B CLEAN OUT COBS _ ° BY GRAPHIC PLOTTING ONLY, THIS PROPERTY FALLS WITHIN ZONE X PER FIRM FIELDWORK PERFORMED MARCH 2014, OCTOBER 5TH, 2010, JULY CONCRETE FOUND 1 T Exhibit B >- SIGN D Foua3 MAP - COMMUNITY PANEL NUMBER Z7053C0374E WITH AN EFFECTIVE DATE 2008 AND AUGUST 09, 2007. P„m\ OF SEPTEMBER 2ND, 2004. n LIGHT LANDSCAPED AREA oat ,P \ q60 BEARING ARE BASED ON HENNEPIN COUNTY COORDINATES AS 4 HAND HOLE ' � a ,p9 � p SHOWN ON THE HENNEPIN COUNTY SURVEYORS OFFICE WEBSITE. PROPERTY SURVEY J , ' B c 0 E I 2 1 B 1 4 1 5 6 XcelEneW — - -- - _ 7�jmq /1,l/ _ _ 1. CUYIWLTOit9All LCMAOf (YPIRRSIAIEdEATTfP m TO TOLLFi+EE�1bN]St11Pil.M _,., \ z ICO: 9WLCOgiOINATENLIH OnlB/ro IOGTE PBIJATEVIe11E4 PROPOSED BUILDING _ _ e rs+ rrRACrorsslwr_E>aIrmmwassrrcsPwozro 10SEENOIE 1040 � -: E "�T - —_ - -- -_ -� Hi1HENGt3:E4 PRpRTO�OFaECQYrtiiLTgt� N l TEIaONA4nYSIM14miNLF%HMG E]P0 ®PJE, WJLVG OU4T61h1�OmPR(Ei0ATm0.55l4fS \\ \\ \ � \\ i r _.?T � S �tMM0111�ONf1 PAYlEl(�x419E WOEPoROftrATFRt40 \ , �\ � ' � 0 � � n W0192NTEx11HOM.9t FCRAYf UrflltYtYIWdF110N9, �\ \ \ J -. _��•(. P3tALL h£H 0(YIfPFIE99f2 ' PROfAE1G49NRHOmnO110E PoRHIPU4*ID _ C � � SEi` W(085PY1WAY.sEE 01LTft'EOZ � � � 1 ..� � T. CIWIR1CIgt9WlfURI '91AW PSIHLNLTEMCPAR/ -v+�, t5E_ra� / I � � - � � _ � 1PARiCCONIROLAW9 +111SRNfATMFACWNIROLPUN res¢anrxvr�nramcmla�ww roonAmtwtAtPnwunamroeccn . alcxawcwz \ \ \\ \ �� \ \ FB,fEl93(31TdiYPE PtSfALL I&NJS SECIIONOFIXMifAflE 4 I. 1 � ,�micm�vc�.ipc �rxwevre corsaxv To r� uTesr Enmav uv dArtco. \V � eslzaxe oP , I i rrxrauermueFwnmam .cesuao srnwsswu ,z�s.»®., s- XM PROPEAII'NE n Am�avcETnArnmlcEA� ,owsmnoru�svAmw.u� �j� \ / 5--'* \ I{ �> 0.09J HEmm -196 FLOIigm. M:F.tSTO PARaVOL0i9° � II I — \ \� \QS�\_ 4 ,�''- --� - Panmluu¢oEnannac III n �WEZmAA U.vPsa Exi v VA T • � �% _ `� �..- � -= -T _�F � - xnxaaEwemaw.moa n -. , �� catatwx:noxlmrs� B . a � v� / � -- � to maosmemnworosE51vroR1EUmmales PFY$As 9••� \ \ •' T �, Y -� row�rnsPm9snavPA — PasrOrvoPq I � PATm 810➢QAUS t4COte0Y \ - \\ \\ / -'' -� y „, �.. .J I � -_�J R0. AAEYF9rtbFLTlm �A - PROPOSED BUILDING / # 72'X72' PATO191NYrt10U9TR41. \ 4. III I ✓ B.iPiBl•+f U I - Y� U #BPROPFRII'ldE \ i \ J .� mo crmsmlo rtarvoPw mom LLI LLJ � � W Z r, R' O LLl � r - O O O ` \- r LL LL ;.. \. \` U OwO LIJ fn fn � ' r �% \� VI ( , ALLOwEC110HS ISSEI6AGC (�, UA i I9 JTAPmcu6312 te'xd1EIW9g1 qe✓a WIL X� 1 \�\ 11945181 MUEDFOR s_ \ CITI'C.U.P. SCALE: 0 15 30 60 120 i Exhibit C PROPOSED SIT E PLAN B c 0 E 8 4 5 8 5 NORTH ELEVATION - STORAGE SHELTER A201 1/8"= V-0" wrurr= Q�rs ExrenaF SL YETOLS. ➢:'G nl, FASi, BNERT alS IFE11➢IS`I 6 � SOUTH ELEVATION - STORAGE SHELTER A201 1/8'= V-0" I I I 2 �vEruEASanmv PrPl �� `snn�a ➢mavE ➢AS1E➢OUNA'E PFPPESQlIS EYrQn OF Pommnivsiusu -:,� i alraRrti, PAST, attESr § _ ry aPVanauffewa:r Austs I \�- OPENTMS `�- OPQIIM'S RQIl0 L0'C. PrcA P£YIN EI VAIIQI� EIEVAMN� ii SFESIW1Gf. PIX R➢ 6 ------------------------ _ L � sFE SIRUCf. � � —aYiC PAtj1YP I, i i sff st0.UCi - v � �� y Fi 9Vi6 r r 1 WEST ELEVATION - STORAGE SHELTER ELEVATION - STORAGE SHELTER A201 1/8"= l'-O' (EAST ELEVATION OPP., SIM.) r I 1 NORTH ELEVATION - VSB A201 1 /8" =1' -0" 2 SOUTH ELEVATION - VSB A201 1/8' I 3 l EAST ELEVATION - VSB I I I I WEST ELEVATION - VSB _9 n� �xvTMag %PAY ff SP.4E A15 I . XcelEnergy- ua..R, for TImA 1 ry W Z W cn U z I— . O Ill o 0 0 01= U WL0 m Lu ;' c �0 Cf) L1J o zp O ODU p r- on�[)� co O wWOO LL O U O�O _ =�z W > cC/) r 0 1c 11s451e1 ISSUED FOR CITY C.UP. 05.052014 E Exhibit D BUILDING ELEVA .TIONS B c 0 E I I I -- - 3 1 4 1 5 I I I 1 1 fi XGWEMW "WA . . ... . ....... N ry uj :z LU u) z C) LU (M oop W a Q Z:) > C13 =) � c w (Lun VU) LU C) z 0 U) ouc) C) �- U) 0 0� 0 0 Lu W o -1 Wm�- w 0 LU W (n LU > co [If 0 r co f0 ISSUED FOR CITY G.U.P. 05.05.2014 SCALE 0 15 Exhibit E PROPOSED TRAFFIC CIRCUI ATION C 0 E N FIXTURE(S) TO BE REMOVED I w _ W1 4 n 1G TD � NEW w VEHICLE w -_i STORAGE - BUILDING 11 W W1 EXISTING SITE LIGHTING POLE - - AND FIXTURE(S) TO BE REMOVED 5 l EXISTING SITE LIGHTING POLE — - -- AND FIXTURE(S) TO REMAIN 0 I SJE LIGHTING RXTURES 8 W - LARGE EXTERIOR WALL BRACKET LED WITH FORWARD THROW, CUT -OFF TYPE DISTRIBUTION. LITHONIA CXSI- 60C- 1000- 40K -TFTM SERIES, OR EQUAL. WI - SMALL EXTERIOR WALL BRACKET LED CUT -OFF TYPE DISTRIBUTION. LITHONIA WSO- LED -700 SERIES, OR EQUAL. GENERAL NOTES A- ALL DUPLEX RECEPTACLES 'HALL HAVE GFCI PROTECTION AND 15P HD N —USE COVERS. B. UNLESS HOTEO OTHER',tiEE, ALL BFAHCH CIRCUITING SHILL OR IG11!ATE FR0LI PANEL L5. C. UNLESS NOTED OTHER1,15E ALL DEVICES SHALL BE !IOUNTED AT 43' AFF TO BOTTOLI OF BOX. KEY NOTES Oj EXTEND EY SLHG 100 A`1P 3 PHASE 4 MIRE FEEDER TO HCI PANEL L5 L-D —IN, PROVDE HEI PAHEL L5. 02 OINT RECEPTACLE BD %ES TO SHELTER BOLDING COLUI.IH, Oj LIGHII.!G CONTROL FOR SHED SHALL UTILIZE OCCUPAHC! ENSOR'. ® PROVDE LED CAN— LMHTED AET LABEL RMSE. 05 EGmNG SITE LwH( B POLE Arm EIXRIRE(S) TO REVI N © EX Im r:G FUEL FU.1PS AND ASSWATED EQUIPLIEUT TO RE!-N. Ew TIr1G 1(L A'.IP U,G FEELER TO RELa1N. © BECUINECT 100 -P FEEDER TO AEIT PARKING (PANEL TO 09 PRDV DE !!E1'! HAHDHOLE FOR TER! ITIA—! OF EXISTING 11!D HEM PAHEL FEEDERS, ® Ee mNG SITE IJGHTIHG POLE AND HXTURE(S) TO SE REIJOVED. lO EXOTI:;G BUILDING MOUNTED R—E TO RE! "1111. © EXISTING BUILDING LIOUNTED FLOOD LIGHT ETXTDRE TO REr/11H. Xae/EneW ' sw a.�a�u:Xssra: i m.am Irk" VIII CII W z LLI u) U z F¢OO W j5 0oF U z�C) CII (D �z Lu C/) 0 OUC) Go X00 O J �LL. LL H ow0 CfI co co O sT�a� �>r amt p I IE SITE LIGHTING PLAN Exhibit F LIGHTING 'LAN z 3 4 5 6 30" *D.0. -'00- *0o- -'00. -00 '00 'Do 0o ).0 '0.0 00 -00 '00 '0.0 '0,0 'Do '0.0 `oD '0.0 'Do '0.0 '0.0 oo '0.0 '0.0 -'O.0 _'0,0 -'00- ''o _'00 '0.0 Noo '00 ,W m rew�„ Introdectlon ® The Contota''Series Iwniw'vcs oRa dtio -1 10 -'0o 'Do -- 'Do -'o.o -Do ..'Do _.'o.o _'oo `o.o 'o.o -o.o 'o,o o.o 'o.o '. `. 'a.o '.0 'oe *0o 'OD '0.o +0.o - 'o. - -'o.o 'Go - *Do -'Do 'Do 'on 'a.a It's Ideal fcrrepladng di 1 hatde n ww,l. T N )o ^''0.0 -Do -Do '00 '0.0 '0.0 '00 -00 '00 '00 0o 'O. 'o. -o.o '0.0 '0.0 0.o '00 - -0.0 '0.0 -'0 00 'a '.._- '. -. '. '0.0 -O.0 `0. '0.0 -0.0 '0.0 '00 -0.0 +0.0 'Do - -'Do *Go '0.0 -0.0 '01 )o 'Do '0,0 +0.0 '0.0 oe -00 0.0 '00 'o.o, 'O.o, '0.0 -'0 '00 0.0 'oe +0.0 0.0 `.0 'O.0 'o.o '00 00 '. '00 '0.0 '0.0 .0 00 '0.0 0 00 - - -'oe - "0.0 -'0.o 0.0 00 '00 '0D '00 '0.0 '0.0 0.0 '0.0 `Of )e +00 "o.o 'o.o '00 '0.0 '0,0 00 '0.0 'oe '0.0 00 '0 '00 o.av !Do - o '0.0 0 -9.8 7 +737 1 6 '124 'Do '0.0 +0.0 'O.O ` '0.0 '00 'O.0 '0.0 '00 'O.0 '0.0 +00 'ao- '0o 'oa 0 0 o0 -'0.0 0.( ).0 '0.0 -0.0 '00 '00 0.0 'Do '0o -a.o '0.0 'O.0 0.0 `00 0.0 'O.o 0.0 00 1 '10.5 125 Rl EW8 IFTt�1V -14.7 '14.6 '13.1 -123 '102 '8 -o.o A '0.0 -Do `0.0 'oe -oo 'Do '00 -00 -D.0 '0.0 -Do '0.0 '0.o -Do '0.( ).0 00 'o.o ,O.a '00 "'0.0 -'00 '0.0 '0.0 -0.0 '0.0 'oo '00 '0.0 0.0 00 oo 9.4 '10.9 13S 1WWIS(T` El5IRI +175.1 '13.9'12.8 `10 'o.0 '0.0 'a.a `o.o 'o0 '0.0 '00 'o.o 'o0 'o.o 'oo 'o.o 'o.o 'o.0 'ol L11' 84 o r'oo ):0 - "00 'Do 'O.0 'Do *Do 'Do 'Do 0.0 'oe +00 'Do '0 +0.0 oo 0.1 0 '0,0 'Q.8 '102 h31A UC T4LJ R1 FL +134 +126 '107 3 '00 '0.0 •0.0 '00 '0.0 '0.0 'o0 '0.0 '0.0 '00 -0.0 'O.l ,'1� 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 00 ).O '0.0 X00 '00 0.0 00'- 0.0 'Do -00 -0.0 'O.0 0.0 I '0.1 0.1 '0.1 0.1 0.1 OI '0.1 '0.1 0.1 '13.6 '125 x Ito '9.9 00 0.0 0 '00 00 '0.0 0,0 Do '00 '0.0 00 eo '0.o -0.0 +0.0 'o.0 0.0 0.( )0 00 '0.0 0.0 00 0.0 '0.o '0.0 '0.0 '00 00 0.1 1 1 02 0.2 0. '0.3 '0.3 '02 '02 -0.3 '0. +.2 '0.1 '0.1 '0.1 '0.1 oo -0.0 '0.0 00 '00 '00 00 +00 '0.0 '0.0 '0o +0.0 '00 '00 '0.0 ee +Ol ),0 '0.0 '0.0 '0.0 +00 '0o '0.0 0.0 'o.0 00 +a1 +0.1 `0. '0.1 '0.5 7 0. '0 .7 +02 0.1 -0.1 '0.1 0.1 'On +0.0 '0,0 .0 '0.0 '0,0 'o.0 '0.0 '0.0 '0.0 'O.0 '0.0 'Do '0.0 )0 +00 '00 '0.0 '0.0 -00 '0.a '0.0 0.0 '0.1 '0.1 -0.1 '0.1 '02 04 08 1: 1.6 '1.6 115 15 6 '1. 1 7 A '02 ' '0.7 0.1 -0.1 00 o 0. 0.0 00 '0.0 '0.0 0.0 oo '0.0 0.0 '0.0 '0.0 00 0.( ).0 '00 '0.0 +0.0 0.0 '0.0 `0,0 '00 0.1 0.1 '0.1 '0.1 0.2 '0. 6 .117 3 `27 '25 '2.6 7 6 '1.0 '0. '02 0.2 '0.1 0.1 '0.1 '0.1 '0.0 0 '0.0 'Oa '0.0 •0.0 '00 'o.0 '0.0 '00 '0.0 '0.0 -00 '0.1 %1 ).0 0.0 0.0 '0.0 '0.0 0.0 '00 +0.0 'O.7 '0.1 '0.1 '02 '0.2 0 '0.7 1.5 - 3.5 '28 3 '0.3 '0.2 '02 0.f '0.1 +0 -1 '.0 'oe +00 '0.0 '0.0 +00 0.0 '0.0 'Oa '00 '0o '0.o 0.0 '0.f ).0 ee '0.0 '00 '0.0 0.0 *0.0 CA `0.1 '0.2 '02 -04 0.9 '1.6 '24 29 '3.1 '3.1 -32 30 '29 25 75 -. `0.1 -Do '0.o '0.0 -Do '0.0 `oe '0.0 '0.0 '0.0 00 '0o 'oe -00 0.( ).0 +00 '0.0 'oe '00 0.0 0.0 '0.1 01 '0 '0.5 ' 7 'I.I '12 IA 2.0 9 +2.8 3.6 42 '4.6 6 '2 '1,4 '1.1 7 '0. '02 '0.1 '0.1 '0.0 +0.0 0.0 '00 +0.0 '0.0 +00 +00 '0.0 +0.0 'O.0 �0.0 '0.f )0 '0.0 00 '0.0 +00 oo e0 +01 02 eA '08 t2 1.7 +21 2.4 28 2.1 2.9 4. .5 '4.1 'SS 3 3 '23 '1.7 12 4 '0.1 '0.1 '0.0 '0.0 +0.0 0.0 'o0 +0.0 '00 '0.0 '0o '00 '0.0 'O.0 '00 -0 '1.7 ' / -' ).0 00 0.0 0,0 -. 00 00 5 1.7 24 27 < W W1 28 -2.8 '23 '1.6 1.0 '0, '0.1 0.0 '0.0 '0.0 0.0 00 '0.o '0.0 '0.0 '0.0 '0.0 '0.0 ''00 0.0 'O( / '0.0 00 0.0 '00 '00 `00 '0.0 'O. 5 '1.1 '20 +31 '3.3 '28 '2. '3,4 '29 '3.5 '29 'I8 I.0 0. '0.1 oo 0.0 '00 -00 '0.0 '00 '00 'O.0 +0.0 -00 '0.0 '00 +0.0 e '0.0 '0.0 `0.0 '00 oe 0.0 'o.l 4 '1.0 '1.9 '3.1 +38 *34 '4.8 NEW 0 '46 '33 '18 28 1.6 0.9 3 +0.1 0.0 '00 '0.0 '0.0 '00 '0.0 '00 'o.0 '0.0 '0o +0.0 '0.0 '0.0 '0.1 VEHICLE EHICLE .00 '0.0 '0.0 0.0 00 00 0. .4 10 18 '30._3.7 35 '5. W W •4.8 '3.4 37 •28 1.6 '0.9 0.. 'o.l -0.0 '0.0 '0.0 00 '0.0 `O.o -00 oo '0.0 -00 'oe '0.0 0.0 OI STORAGE '0.o '00 oo '00 +00 'O,1 .4 1.1 '2a '32 '37 32 38 o +3.9 '29 '3.7 +29 18 '0.9 - 3 '0.1 'Do `00 ee '0.0 +00 '00 '0.0 '0.0 +0.0 '0.0 '0.0 '0.0 'O '0.{ BUILDING .a 'Oe +0.0 Do '0.0 -00_ '0- .5 +12 'I 9. _.'28 '30 '2.8 23 0 '24 28 3.0 '25 +1.7 le '0. '0.1 *0.0 on '0.0 0.0 0.0 '0.0 '00 o0 0.0 +0.0 Co 'O.0 *00 I01� '00 '0.0 00 +0.1___-D 0.5 •0.9 1.4- +21 •25 '24 0 'I. '24 24 '1.9 '13 0.8 '0. '0.1 0.0 00 '0.0 0.0 '00 'O.0 0.0 '0.0 'o.0 0.0 '00 '00 0.0 '0.1 1Y 007 '0.0 '00 +0.1 '0. - '0. 0.6 'I 0 '14 '17 0 25 1 2- 3.2 5 2 4. \ 5.0 ` 2` '1 8 +1.3 ' 9 0 '0.1 '0.1 +OD '0.0 '00 '0.0 '0.0 0.0 +0.0 '0.0 '00 +0.0 '0.0 -0.0 *0.0 '011 +0.1 - - 2 '06 1.1 2 '2.8 `3.1 '03 '03 '0.2 +o.l 0.1 '0.0 +0.0 '0.0 '0.0 '0.0 *0 0 ee 'Do 00 '0 0 '0.0 e 0 '0.1 +00 00 '0.1 +0.1 02 '0.3 '0 `2A '29 '3.5 '36 3.7 '3.4 '28 0.4 `0.1 '0.7 '0.1 '0.0 '0.0 '00 00 'OA '0.0 00 'OA 00 00 'O.O X0.9- '00 '01 I '00 00 0.1 +0.1 '0.1 - - 02 '0.2 03 07 '1.4 20 2.7 -33 '32 3.3 '3.2 '25 1.9 '12 '0. o2 +0.2 '0.1 '0.1 -0.1 '0.1 'Do '0.0 '0.0 '0.0 '0.0 '00 oo '00 '00 '0,0 '00 '01 Do Do 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 02 0. 0.5 I.0 1.4 2.0 2.1 20 29 21 1.9 1.3 0.9 0. 02 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Oa, 'Do '0.1 '0.1 O. '0.1 'Di '0. 0.6 '0.9 '1.2 1.2 '1.1 'IA +1.2 '12 9 e '0,1 '04 '0.1 11.1 0.0 `0.0 '0.0 '0.0 '0.0 , 0.0 '0,0 +0.1 '0.1 '0.1 '0.1 2 '05 '0.8 0.5 '05 '0.5 0.5 '0.6 '0 0.3 '0.2 '0.1 '0.1 '0.1 0.0 -0.0 'DO -00 0.o '0.0 . 'Do '0.0 0.1 0.1 +0.7 0.1 .- '02 02 '. ' 1 2 +0.2 C2 '0,1 '0.1 '0.1 '00 'Oo '0.0 +00 0.0 0.0 +0.0 '00 00 0.0 '0.0 0.1 +0.1 0.1 VI 0,1 '0.1 'Do 'Do 'aI 'a.1 '0.1 '0.1 '0.1 0.0 '0.0 '0.0 +0.0 Ce '0.0 0.0 '0.0 '00 ao on 'o.o 'o0 _ 00 0.0 00 . ', 00 '0.0 '0.0 'D.0 0,0 +0.0 '0.0 '0.0 '00 '0.0 'O.0 '00 -0.0 0.0 '0.0 -0,o '0.0 '0.o '00 00 00 'o.o 'Do oa , +Do -Do 0.0 Oa Do '0.0 '0.0 00 '0.0 +0.0 'Do '0.0 '0.0 '0.0 `00 `0.0 '0.0 'Do +0.0 -o.o 'ao 'o.o 'o.a 'o.o 'oo °o- -::'oo `OS- _.- an__ 'Go . 'oo ` 0_O __'ao__.'oa. _'oo _'o.o `a.a 'a.o 'a.o `oo 'oo 'o.o 'o.o I I mN L' 1 SITE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN E002 1'= 20' -0" 2 1 4 SITE LIGHTING FIXTURES W - LARGE EXTERIOR WALL BRACKET LED WITH FORWARD THROW, CUT -OFF TYPE DISTRIBUTION, LITHOEIIA CXSI- 60C- 1000- 40K -TFTM SERIES, OR EQUAL. WI - SMALL EXTERIOR WALL BRACKET LED CUT -OFF TYPE DISTRIBUTION. LITHONIA WSO- LED -700 SERIES, OR EOUAL. CSX1 LED I > C8X1- 60C- 1000-40K -TFTM- LED Area Luminaire with Wall Bracket MVOLT- WBA- DDBXD- ,W m rew�„ Introdectlon ® The Contota''Series Iwniw'vcs oRa dtio -1 sq�ax d}fum; r.1th wkened edges fer a ,ar=�n+e look th=t mmp.emc.;ss mart / eppf ''ores Speuficatioit / The CSXl camy.nes the latestm LED tech,wlog7 vith the f- tar ae,7hee ftl -C- S- for sty'--h, hij1perfcrm n nthatl -2 " It's Ideal fcrrepladng di 1 hatde n ww,l. T N val- mounted afpf�ti -th t}p- nerg] 8ds1•t se 'rgs of 655, arul e>Pe7ed sc..,m V. of m•s- w�1 f•�>k r 100NOhcyz EXAMPLE: CSX1 LED 60C 1000 40K T3 MVO LT MA DOBXD cot a m�ya.x4 mo>ti A<ca WSQ LED I r WSO-LED-7005R4-M19VOLT- Architectural Wall Sconce (.. DDBXO •W1' M1n.•,�.� tnerodoction The de hrhitecwrl wa1 Sm Ls now a,a9ab.e 1,.6 the let.- LED tcrhno'og� The Spedff atlons result Is Iorg4 fe, pmd tv.ith Lumtnalre Opti onal Back BO%(BBN!) typ;rale Jsaingsd]SX comparedm metal -h ?�t" Neght >, haLdes esThe interya barcery badvp option yry� bt /a^ ntdtk d, Prouideg =nq eg.es >Ightng. vidroRtFe !-_ badbnxwreenote gea., so nrta'lanors wplk - 0.p,k u„ ma'rnta'n the, aesthetsc'ntegmy L®e'dx(wrtpaorgeaslm9.�0- ^ D- 1]N /merulh !id=_vallmowted pmdac>z The �N Old Bm�� e.pened sen>ce frfe is 201 years of nightGme;ce. - y J L EXAMPLE: WSO LED 210A70014OK SR3 MVOLT ODBTXD 1n01:0 - t mtxim in.) s§na�c�xy Emer9enry Battery Operation L/G/LTING . XcelEneW �JSe�a o_1� TK" I..1_ Lu Z LIJ co U CD L0 z °0 W o 0 U3 CD U � W C_ j Ib z::D O� LLJ (D co Lu O UO O O cf) X 0 0 O w ED I U_ _ 000 Lu > to 1 /lO VJ D 11945181�I ISSUED FOR CITY C.UP. 05.052014 E SITE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN E002 F -2 CITY OF C24 •' 111 5755 Country Club Road, Shorewood, Minnesota 55331 Tel (952) 960 -7900 TO: Brad Nielsen, Planning Director FROM: Paul Hornby, City Engineer DATE: May 29, 2014 RE: Xcel Energy Shorewood Service Center Proposed Site Improvements — 5505 Manitou Road The project improvements consist of the addition of two buildings and a concrete storage pad. Sanitary sewer and water sei vices are proposed for connection to one of the buildings. Plans have been prepared by TKDA issued for C.U.P. application and dated May 5, 2014. The following items pertain to the site improvement plan review from an engineering standpoint: 1. The proposed sanitary sewer and water improvements impact the new City sidewalk extended along CSAH 19 last year. The proposed sanitary sewer service and water service are proposed for open - cut /trench construction and restoration of the trail matching the original construction. The sidewalk will need to be closed and posted as such meeting the MMUTCD. A one week advanced notice of the time period of the sidewalk closing needs to be posted to alert pedestrians. 2. The proposed water service connects to the Tonka Bay watermain in the east boulevard /shoulder of CSAH 19. The water service connection will need to be made to the City of Shorewood watermain located at Glen Road and CSAH 19. Directional drilling or boring of the service across CSAH 19 is suggested. 3. The sanitary sewer service connection is to be with a service sleeve, strap -on wye with gasket, and the mainline pipe is to be core - drilled for the connection. The connection is required to be watertight. The cored pipe material is to be retrieved from the pipe during connection so it does not float downstream and affect a downstream pumping station. 4. A permit from Hennepin County Public Works will be needed for work within County right of way. 5. The silt fence on the erosion control plan proposed along CSAH 19 needs to be shown along the back of sidewalk instead of back of curb to reduce conflict with pedestrians while the sidewalk is open. A second section of silt fence will be needed at the curb line at the utility trenches. 6. The erosion control plan shows two locations for CB inlet protection and the estimated quantity states four locations. There are two culverts crossing under the City sidewalk near the LRT Trail that should also have inlet protection. 7. The applicant should be aware that construction of the Three Rivers Park District LRT Trail overpass of CSAH 19 may be under construction and coordination with their contractor may be required for work within CSAH 19, the City sidewalk, and for erosion control. Additional comments may be made on subsequent plan submittals. Please contact me if you have questions or need any additional information. I� ®o® ,PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER C) 0 N r �o CD z 0 0 M 0 jol m ■ ©1M (Ido�i -3 V, L U) L c� cn U m V_ N p�J IM aUln t it x N _D S11! m m Q , cn cn CL µ c e WON m � N \v A W a F- x U da a Exhibit A ��SITE LOCATION Busch Subdivision/Combination 8976'00' w ----------------------- A point 330 feet South of 0,40 the North line of the Southeast 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 25, Township 117, Range 23 _ __ A line parallel with the East l - " line of the Southeast 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of the a Southeast 1/4 of Section N h N 25, Township 117, Range 23 `* o I � I S 8926'00" E — -- 15L70 -- EASELINT FOR DRAINAGE AND.! unUTY EASEUINT PER DOG Na 6270061 41.1 � �11(A <a a F <° �1 a �9 M W I � ----------------------------------- C --------------- ------------ --------------------- EA' WTFC -G -- A,- 627-757 PROPOSED LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF RE The South 20 feet of the North 163.34 feet of following described parcel: That part of the Southeast 1/4 of the Southeas A line parallel with the Nortt a 117, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota, line of the Southeast 1/4 of NORTH thereof, thence North along the East line 287. the Southeast 1/4 of the distance of 334.7 feet, thence North parallel W Southeast 1/4 of Section the North line thereof, thence West parallelw feet thereof, thence South along said West lin 25, Township 117, Range 23 beginning. I -- 334.70 -- -Fence ( EASE7./EN2; FOR 1 /0 � .t y I 10 (-r I� g e I 1 1° 131 �g I low � I� I I y I 1 =- g I $ b I � 10 I /0 a W ri1 W S 8926100' E -- 183.00 -- DOG Na 5o'O ° o f - -- EASEMENT - Fop -4 BE V�AC�A�TI - ..-AND _�F/'" S 892600' Dd- I I g I R I b I i I � I I g I � I � I � I I � I WIReG Nbl /v � I 2 I a I I I I 1 a --- - - - --- I 627D0k I ----------- ---- { PARCI '7 ------ �1LIrI�I_y� ;E PER DOG He] 6270012 ___________i . -------- W EAtSIING texm______ I I s§sl / ' ONSERV PJN�A 6270060 i I I -- -- PERDOA _ r I z I I 04S7 --- = - - - -- ------------------------------- - ----------------------------- EASE7/ENT FOR DRAINAGE AND UDCITY EASE7/ENT PER DM Na 6270 -SJ ----- o I -- 335.00 -- N 897149" W The southeast earner of the Southeast 1/4 of the —The South line of the Southeast 1/4 Southeast 1/4 Southeast 1/4 Exhibit B 25, Township 1' PROPOSED DIVISION /COMBINATION ° 1 I I 2 f Memorandum Re: Zucco /Larsen — Subdivision and Combination 29 May 2014 The applicant's surveyor should prepare legal descriptions for drainage and utility easements as shown on the proposed subdivision/combination. 4. The applicant's attorney must prepare deeds for the new road right -of -way and the proposed drainage and utility easements referenced in 1. — 3., above. The applicant's attorney must prepare an up -to -date (within 30 days) title opinion for review by the City Attorney. 6. Items 1 -5, above, must be completed within 30 days, after which the request will be reviewed by the City Council. Upon his receipt of a certified copy of the resolution approving the division/combination the applicant must record the division with Hennepin County within 30 days. Cc: Bill Joynes Tim Keane Bill Zucco -2- a� CD o LL N r -p O z o o 0 CD M Bent lo.kj � N / &PO ct as J a C � U W > t J U) d -s Exhibit A SITE LOCATION U OLL. ?z -, M o COW 'A z °�i -- -- ? Z Q w °m J e y II^^ _ n� _ . T; = G O O V /e % �` b8.96Z 3.£i•S£e 1 N �� ro LLI I.L. 1� O ah� / `��` _ a •o o .y '$''S E $ Z Z v / t p -zQ•� @ /�/ W / / 'Ib�lyil�o w2VI,r W �J r' Z _�_ '+ v pE m mto rn" o tm( v� �y� y�'? 7 y �/ .('�•J y�S ZT�� V S 8 � _ £i o •C c y r�- v Tu W W O Q L� / qi t bSb�( Q l/I o? E _N a._ m m rn s p .. g 2 J r F 4 �` m �fS'n [L Z D `' I� j •_ ;; m Y F �Y `JN /lsk m — o ' •. Oy p Z ry ro J O .p IC f17 p y �- 2 K LLB :7 w Z �� opj/ j o 9y1 '�' "L { v « `- 3 �, w" ° J z O '�•ro c, m"ornTn a z W Z !/ 4 W0) S' N = o Y 'o= $$ow`v U�r, o a /W/ liU Q z i yy. ZUl (� 3 `o @�� .°. a�v°iv 55 uroi s.aoa`' lZ O Z„- V :•Ir3 0. Arno � °' , _°' y�c�omTOEy= °off rii z �v xN N R' Vi t5s ._ o �y ° ov i V _ / / / /^> � °A pa0. 6 '� ! 'y6_6 �`_ 00 J y W N zf �TA■ a `° i.d - .�m Oro , . -o a z m �' > °$ � g .` z 06 z z ? Z ° 'E = r o m W rT 8 U w 9£ o « -• m m lL °c W LL c�i a __ / �i j `�''�_ ��__ u9si`'•. Y •S r6 v v z E ro E tX < < a. 2•g`� m`m °' nyo$ `S `ow�Z��o�E p K i Jo. a S U � n8yfimti$°z= S W W w j �� = 606de6`,1 �� n� O A w a Z v v cn « 5i z 'p 'S LLJI J j / 1 990 W Nu.L Z % C (6 uj o LO UJ Y. / /........ _ 1 /� VII ,2, 0 ° p ca ` _ lliCl ss� / y broz ............. ! `��_ / �` S w ° 'o ��` v -8. m c : �r it a Ae, ................................ 1 / oryo / / o aB•yol M.s1.e9.51 �� I �, S . m a $ O m v e o • � rn g S � n 5 F « t f m (� >' �-•� �j �i _ i 7 ..... .- .��__ ��ippT -. w W ro � L. e-5 h Oboy s / m iron 9z v oL.ro c v � ��=g.9 v W. `Mlo d ,Yyry��, y F' z y ��•y" ° � —` _ `o yes v=m taros SE Z i 1— J O NbM� —'E-6 _SN.Sa gi m B `o l z °� m aI 1'8 � NT. Z �g C uuu�111 }} y� O o j W Iz t So - z o G oNi�vuc_Lc° ,v_o d Y `�'• N q w �� a ?� « �' •-� d >, @ .�' _• ro ,.'a `� E Y O tr � N ti ,� w q x rz °mE _ a 26 mom o=c 00 $'o� °�xzAEm�tEd ° w �' o LLl r 5 P z� W �G N a v '-c-' r a di .°c rn a L .Z C y� m S :� N m LLI `{ I •s �� Ur a $ ._� z .. tS o m c L `= Z¢ Z LU OF oo E E'er oZ� a c�i roy�.. v °2 w F- ^ U LL, y `obi y W5,° . E C �N aoe°im per'- v ..� Y W J J .•S P •C J CO A U •0�. S N ¢ W J d [- N • O 0 CD M U) ;; :..1 Exhibit B } PROPOSED DIVISION /COMBINATION 14.I ZO