Loading...
04-17-18 Planning Commission AgendaCITY OF SHOREWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING TUESDAY, APRIL 17, 2018 AGENDA CALL TO ORDER 1. APPROVAL OF AGENDA 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES March 6, 2018 3. PUBLIC HEARINGS COUNCIL CHAMBERS 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD 7:00 P.M. ROLL CALL / (LIAISON) SCHEDULE RIEDEL (Apr) MADDY (Jun) GORHAM (Jul) EGGENBERGER (May) DAVIS (Mar) A) 7:00 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING — C.U.P FOR ACCESSORY SPACE OVER 1200 SQ. FT. Applicant: Michael Schroeder (rep. Jack and Gretchen Norqual) Location: 27960 Smithtown Road B) 7:10 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING — C.U.P. FOR ACCESSORY SPACE OVER 1200 SQ. FT.; C.U.P. FOR FILL IN EXCESS OF 100 CU. YDS.; AND A SETBACK VARIANCE Applicant: TEA2 Architects (rep. Jodie and Paul Siegle) Location: 5550 Marsh Pointe Drive 4. OTHER BUSINESS None 5. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR 6. REPORTS Council Meeting Report SLUC Summary Draft next meeting agenda 7. ADJOURNMENT CITY OF SHOREWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING TUESDAY, MARCH 6, 2018 MINUTES CALL TO ORDER Chair Maddy called the meeting to order at 7:03 P.M. ROLL CALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD 7:00 P.M. Present: Chair Maddy; Commissioners Davis, Eggenberger, and Riedel; Planning Director Darling; and, Council Liaison Sundberg Absent: Commissioner Gorham 1. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Davis moved, Riedel seconded, approving the agenda for March 6, 2018, as presented. Motion passed 4/0. 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES January 16, 2018 Davis moved, Riedel seconded, approving the Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of January 16, 2018, as presented. Motion passed 4/0. 3. PUBLIC HEARINGS None 4. OTHER BUSINESS A. Discuss Planning Commission Organization and 2018 Work Program Commissioner Davis nominated Dustin Maddy to serve as Chair for the Planning Commission. Commissioner Riedel nominated Sue Davis to serve as Vice - Chair. Chair Maddy and Commissioner Davis agreed to serve in those capacities. Chair called for a voice vote. Motion passed 4/0. Liaison Assignments: March — Commissioner Davis April — Commissioner Riedel May — Commissioner Eggenberger June — Chair Maddy July — Commissioner Gorham (tentatively) Planning Director Darling reviewed her suggestions for 2018 Work Program and noted that she included a suggested outline for items the Commission should discuss throughout the year. She reviewed some of her suggested discussion items and asked if the Commissioners had anything else to include. CITY OF SHOREWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING March 6, 2018 Page 2 of 4 Commissioner Riedel stated that outgoing Commissioner Bean had suggested that the Commission look at the accessory space rule of 1,200 sq. ft., which may fall under exterior storage. Chair Maddy agreed that it would be worth looking into. Director Darling asked if the Commission if any of the items on the list jumped out as higher priority items. Chair Maddy stated the exterior storage item jumped out at him because now there are no leaves on the trees and he can see storage units. Commissioner Riedel stated that proactive code enforcement was discussed at the last meeting and he questions whether it is in the Commissioners purview or if it should be a Council action. Planning Director Darling stated that the Commission may want to take a look at the exterior standards before looking at proactive code enforcement. Commissioner Riedel questioned whether the matter of proactive code enforcement was up to the Commission to decide and handle. Director Darling stated that it would be a City policy, but the Commission can work on what the City is looking for example, nuisance issues, but setback issues and other details won't be able to be handled this way. Commissioner Riedel stated that there was a situation several months ago, where the applicant was applying for a variance to have the air conditioner in the side setback. There were pictures presented that showed the neighbor had the exact same violation and it was only because this applicant was applying for a building permit that they were required to comply and the neighbor was not. In his opinion, proactive code enforcement is a complicated issue. Chair Maddy agreed and stated that it may be best to leave it with the Council and have the Commission address regulations. Commissioner Riedel stated that just before Planning Director Darling started at the City, there were some code changes that suggested solar panels would be allowed with certain caveats. The one caveat that he was not comfortable with was where the language basically stated it would be approved provided the neighbors didn't object to the glare it caused. He said that he didn't think that was very well thought through and suggested once again taking some time to take a look at the language surrounding solar panels. Director Darling stated she will take a look at the language and add this to the Work Program for 2018. Council Liaison Sundberg asked if Planning Director Darling, with her experience coming from the City of Plymouth, saw things in our codes that should perhaps be written up or handled differently. She stated that she would welcome this kind of input from Planning Director Darling. Planning Director Darling stated that she did have a few things in mind, for example, public hearings versus public meetings. She noted, in relation to the schedule for meetings for the upcoming year, that she had included in the packet what she expects the meeting schedule will be. CITY OF SHOREWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING March 6, 2018 Page 3 of 4 5. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR None. 6. REPORTS • Liaison to Council Council Liaison Sundberg stated she had nothing to report. • Update on Projects Approved Director Darling stated that Minnetonka Country Club is moving into the design phase and sales appear to be going very well. She expects the City's building division to be very busy this summer. The Starbucks is moving towards a building permit, as they have moved beyond most of the conditions put forth by the City. • Draft Next Meeting Agenda Director Darling stated that the Commission will be looking at two conditional use permits for accessory space over 1,200 sq. ft. One of these will also include a conditional use permit to bring in more than 100 yards of fill and a setback variance. There may also be a three -lot subdivision. The City has received a partial application, but it is not yet complete. Chair Maddy asked if Director Darling planned to discuss Fire Lanes at the next meeting. Director Darling stated that she needed a little more time to prepare for that discussion and suggested that the Commission may want to hold some sort of informational meeting where people can come and talk about it in more depth before there are any code amendments. She thinks there should be public testimony without having something preconceived by the Commission. She stated that the survey that was completed as part of the Comprehensive Plan showed responses that people really want more public access to the lake. She thinks there are a lot of people that don't know the Fire Lanes are there and can provide access to pedestrians and you can launch a canoe or a kayak from these locations. Commissioner Davis asked about upcoming presentation on March 21, entitled "Does Every Road Need To Be A Runway ". She stated that when the City works on a road, Public Works Director Brown wants them to be wide and the neighborhoods fight to keep them narrower. She feels this might be an interesting presentation. Director Darling stated that this presentation is by the Sensible Land Use Coalition which is an informational group that tries to look at things from a land use perspective and is made up of planners, developers and real estate professionals. She noted the meeting will be held at Brookview in Golden Valley. Commissioner Davis and Eggenberger expressed interest in attending this presentation. Council Liaison Sundberg stated that she thought of one thing she would like to share with the Commission. She noted that she had to keep it very vague, but there is an entity that has been approved in the City and some things have come up at their other locations that are making the Council wish they had asked more questions about how they operate before approval had been given. She has taken this situation as a way to caution herself when new development comes into the City, to pay attention to past problems they may have had that could make our community look bad or even be bad for our residents. CITY OF SHOREWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING March 6, 2018 Page 4 of 4 7. ADJOURNMENT Riedel moved, Davis seconded, adjourning the Planning Commission Meeting of March 6, 2018, at 7:36 P.M. Motion passed 4/0. MEMORANDUM CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 Country Club Road • Shorewood, Minnesota 55331 • 952- 960 -7900 Fax: 952- 474 -0128 • www.ci.shorewood.mn.us • cityha11 @ci.shorewood.mn.us TO: Planning Commission, Mayor and City Council FROM: Patti Helgesen, Assistant Planner MEETING DATE: April 3, 2018 REQUEST: Schroeder Management, LLC — Conditional Use Permit for Accessory Space in Excess of 1,200 Square Feet LOCATION: 27960 Smithtown Road REVIEW DEADLINE: July 10, 2018 LAND USE CLASSIFICATION: Minimum Density Residential ZONING: R- IA/S FILE NO.: 18.03 REQUEST 41 Schroeder Management, LLC (on behalf of Jack and Gretchen Norqual) is requesting a Conditional Use Permit to allow over 1200 square feet of accessory space on the property. Notice of this application was published in both the City's official newspapers and mailed to all property owners within 750 feet of the property at least 10 days prior to the meeting. BACKGROUND • �t w- 4 Context: The property currently contains two buildings; an older shed built in 1930 and a single - family dwelling. In 2009, the house that was on the site was demolished, and a smaller single - family dwelling was constructed to serve as a principal use for the property. The owners are now ready to construct a new home and they would like to keep the two existing buildings for garage and storage space. The existing single- Page 2 family dwelling will be converted into a garage /storage building and the shed will remain as is. The new home will contain an attached garage, and the combined total floor area of all accessory space will be over 1200 square feet, requiring a Conditional Use Permit. The property is zoned R -lA /S, Single- Family Residential/Shoreland and contains approximately 101,495 square feet of area. The proposed home will contain 6,042 square feet of floor area on two floors. The attached garage will contain 1,161 square feet, the detached (converted) garage will have 1,502 square feet, and the shed is 625 square feet for a total of 3,288 square feet of accessory space. The zoning code requires that detached accessory structures not exceed 15 feet or one story in height. The converted house /garage was built to comply with these provisions since it was intended to become an accessory structure. It has only an attic with a low ceiling height and is accessible by a pull down stair. The older shed also has an attic that was modified back in 2009 to lower the ceiling height in order to comply this provision of the zoning code. ANALYSIS Applicable Code Section: Section 1201.03 Subd.2.d.(4) of the Shorewood Zoning Code contains four specific criteria for granting this type of conditional use permit. Following is how the applicants' proposal complies with the Code: a. The total area of accessory space (3,288 square feet) does not exceed the total floor area above grade of the principle structure (6,042 square feet). b. The total area of accessory space does not exceed ten percent of the minimum lot area for the R- lA /S zoning district (.10 x. 40,000 square feet = 4000 square feet). C. The proposed home complies with the setback requirements for the R -lA /S zoning district. The proposed impervious surface coverage would be 16.6 percent, which complies. Given the size of the property and the amount of existing vegetation on the site, drainage and landscaping are not considered to be issues in this request. The applicants' tree preservation and reforestation plan will be submitted with the building permit for the new house. d. The materials and design of the new home are consistent with the character of the existing buildings on the site. RECOMMENDATION Staff finds the applicants' request to be consistent with the requirements of the Shorewood Zoning Code and recommends that the conditional use permit be granted as requested. ATTACHMENTS: Location Map Applicant's Narrative and Plans Photos of Existing Buildings Survey and Site Plan z�T N A Ra P, 0 300 600 1,200 a Feet CO CD 0 00 Roa ar �r n nn c� Ct � Lake Minnetonka �a C m 5� d c� / L �r y e v oSubject it o Property La 0 62 z Accessory Shed 625sgft Built approx. 1930's Structurally updated and re roofed by permit early 2000's Not Heated, No City Sewer & Water RECE EEI FEB 14 2018 CITY OF SHOREWOOD OLDERSHED Accessory Building 1 1,320sgft Built 2010 Garage, Y One Interior Room with 2 Closets 1-% Bath, City Sewer & Water Connected, Heated Refrigerator and Sink, No Range or Oven HOUSE (CONVERTED TO ACCESSORY SPACE) 2/14/18 To: City of Shorewood 5755 Country Club Rd Shorewood, MN 55331 From: Jack & Gretchen Norqual 27960 Smithtown Road Shorewood, MN 55331 Jack & Gretchen Norqual the owners of real property located at 27960 Smithtown Road PID 31- 117 -23 -34 -0034 in Shorewood MN request a Conditional Use Permit to exceed the 1,200sgft maximum accessory area to allow for the construction of a new residence on the above property. Attached is a certificate of survey dated 1/2/18 showing the existing accessory structures and a proposed drawing showing the new residence. The proposed plan will meet all the city requirements of Accessory Structures with the exception of the maximum 1,200sgft total area requirement. After completion of the new residence the total area of attached and detached accessory space will be 3,288 sqft. This is under the 10% of minimum lot area requirement of 4,000sgft, it is also under the 6,042sgft of finished above grade square footage of proposed principal residence, and will consist of no more than 3 buildings. The existing accessory structures are in excellent condition, built or repaired and inspected by previous city approved permits, are within the buildable lot area, less than 15' in height, landscaped, and are in architectural character of the property including the new proposed residence. Detached accessory buildings are accessory space for owner's personal use and will not be rented or used as living quarters. Thank you for your Consideration, Jack & Gretchen Norqual RECEIVED MAR 13 2010 CITY OF SHOREWOOD APPLICANT'S NARRATIVE Certificate of Survey LECENO — 988 — denotes Existing Contour smoo X denotes Existing Spot Elevation rF =989.36 denotes Finished Floor Elevation T❑ denotes Telephone Pedestal o denotes Electrical Pedestal N O denotes Power Pole 1'p denotes Wafer Shulo(f Valve ® denotes Sanitary Manhole El denotes Catch Basin denotes Deciduous Tree denotes Coniferous Tree o m F� — 55 — denotes Sanitary Sewer Line — OnE — denotes Overhead Electric Line — x — denotes Fence Line �m denotes Existing Culvert - - - - -- denotes Drainage and Utility Easement per the plat BILL ERICKSON ADDITON - — - denotes Building Setback Line Front = 50' Side = 30' O.H.W.L. - 50' X92 &26 X976.95 01 / / X931.14 C I \ ance orner 4.9' en Corner l 18' % Fesf Hwlh o/ the�� x F f1 ce Nwlh aI Roperly LHe %Ix -gam\ Roperly Line X X X929.71 ' _S63 2,M Plo '- \ gq I 1 ) 1 ;­47 \ X92 6.51 0' / 936 .� 59804'01 "W 199.67 \ T —' IGf10 1 gN8898 9 "E : \ '�- / 5884 \ •938 a °' \ o'.it949.99 i ' 1�-yy ej - -- --\ \ ' ` J d X92 &9J 912 L� / ' ta 46 9946 1 _ „{r T/ i 11 / 933. / ,, �• i�' �C'0 O uvAPIL£ I I l ` \ \ \ `' -�,/ / J/ n / m / �i- .�•- ` . yr 945.7z /� p Fi \ 'i6• �yA,r( 6 t,-1 r t'• .cy �"'%_ �O I/APLE T Mm k: T5 _ Top / We8 CoeFg `'�PLf (EISw1An = 1991779.) 65 feel {C� � GNWL: X9413 8 M1 � 110 ii +W ` �� y Present \ \ \ \ \\\ /SwwY Liriq / �77LAP4E \ / .:;•�-qy? -" •�-` 274.86 VVV 1 \/1 'CEO =l3. ``"- 1- ",9'9+,Ai'42T X970.92 Ar e 2.35 ACRES / X9 78 l 6 \\ \ \ I 1 \'k. y 3�('j1A/i.E X930.67 \ \ \ \ X947.96 �9J1915 \ \\ \\ \ \` \� I I I X917.02 l/ LAKE \ \��\ \ \g),71APLE I \ \ X947.44 \\ MINNETONKA \�� \ R \ �71 =APLE Cvdnwy Hgh 961sT £lewllan 92A 10 Feet (ILGY.D. 1929) \ \ Highest Recorded IWtw EtewtW - 930.57 Feel (HGV.D. 1929) \ \\ \\ — \ y / �/ / 1 la= �;•i'`,atir Top a1lce ElewH- on 1 -2 -18 - 97859 Feel (RGV.D. 1919) \� \ V \ \\ \ 117 CEDAR /� / 1 •a \ 24'CWAR X931.06 X93a55 J' 70 'qy� �93a` / g / 15" GIP , 4 6ok 93�( � \ ✓9 La T�`) -I------ - - - -�— I I — f5^GVP- 976: --ar 1rHleo 1474 1nv2a 31 ` nee Lk,.) 9 — H900000Y 127.10 Ja ore /i I / T/ /l T A 15' Cup A� / F ce Line 0.5' 7F 1 *.I f Pp ner �x IProperly Cor \ )K936. a5 \I I I I\ \ I I I Property Description: Lot 4, Block 1, BILL ERICKSON ADDITION, Hennepin County, Minnesota, according to the recorded plot thereof. a� ao 0 C H c O1 Haag O E � maA c d a a y a m • O • E `m m CM h im 3 o,m�lk l 3 � O ` w o p 1 m L ¢ Z \ ► o I'n aJ 0 ,c c w O U Le_ a• U 0 M m O" Z Y j O o 00 1 N d`ma�0 � F m NEr�� &aa g, m H O C R� u � ry.cmi .5 �j u oU m ,c ofJ O OZ N 0.l O C V1Q� ti IS BRiCK HOUSE ARCHITECTS CLARIDGE & FALK ream srsurt[ hLNNFMDltS, MN S�a]3 [f 16]])x5 The Norqual Residence 219605mhh —Rmd Escelsioy DlN 55331 Onncrs: G -hm &hd Nm0vo1 CSI MA 1 3 2018 CITY OF �HGIINEWOOD ��IN�19EI�1�I9�11�9fry�16111�I�P0��1 �9191��IiVI�QI�BN 51TE DATA: TOTAL LOT AREA: 101,495 SF A. PROPOSED NEW, PRIMARY RESIDENCE HOU5E 3,582 5F COVERED, OPEN PORCHES 734 5F TOTAL NEW, PRIMARY BLDG COVERAGE 4,31 G 5F B. ACCE550KY BUILDING COVERAGE: PROPOSED ATTACHED GARAGE I,IGI 5F EX5TG ACCE550RY BUILDING # 1 1,320 5F EX5TG SHED G25 5F TOTAL ACCE55OPY BLDG COVERAGE 3,1 CG 5F overage Including 182sgft Garden Room C. WALKWAYS/ DRIVES: 3,288 SF WE5T TERRACE, 5TEPS 70G 5F EA5T WALKWAY5/ DRIVEWAY 4,960 5F EXI5TING GRAVEL DRIVE 3,600 5F TOTAL WALKWAY5, DRIVES 9,266 5F TOTAL HARDCOVER: (A + B + C) I G,G88 5F HARDCOVER PERCENTAGE: ( 1 6,688 / 101,495) 1 G.44 PROPOSED; ABOVE GRADE HOU5E F5F: MAIN LEVEL 3,582 5F UPPER LEVEL 2,460 5F TOTAL: 6,042 5F N 2/12/18 SITE PLAN East (Entry) Elevation BRiCK HOUSE ARCHITECTS CLARIDGE & PALK 11 NEHN SEfulFxlf wxF�GNb, AlN EI INlll is PNOIFlT: The Norqual Residence e W.,WflD1 o..m:a'.I.&JKt Nn,d BUILDING ELEVATION — EAST North Elevation LEE BRiCK HOUSE ARCHITECTS CLARIDGE & FALK I MENhnsN1E stray xW Ssiu wxFiT. The Norqual Residence 2 -M A—� E ttLiix,NNSSUI Axxxs: G(ckAa &]xk Y.mpW BUILDING ELEVATION — NORTH West (Lakeside) Elevation RE BRICK HOUSE ARCHITECTS CLARIDGE & FALK IHF4F SiSUI1F F�FI➢0.6,MN 3L13 15531 FS - The Norqual Residence & dC.I.MN53331 0— &J k BUILDING ELEVATION — WEST South Elevation i K E rs UK BUILDING ELEVATION SOUTH 4 7Jli a CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 Country Club Road • Shorewood, Minnesota 55331 • 952- 960 -7900 Fax: 952- 474 -0128 • www.ci.shorewood.mmus • cityha11 @ci.shorewood.mn.us MEMORANDUM TO: Planning Commission, Mayor and City Council FROM: Marie Darling, Planning Director MEETING DATE: April 3, 2018 REQUEST: TEA2 Architects for two CUPS and a variance to allow construction of a new home and detached garage LOCATION: 5550 Marsh Pointe Drive REVIEW DEADLINE: July 10, 2018 LAND USE CLASSIFICATION: Minimum Density Residential ZONING: R -1 A FILE NUMBER: 18.04 REQUEST The applicant (on behalf of property owners Jodie and Paul Siegle) proposes to construct a new home and detached garage on the subject property. The proposal requires the following applications: • A CUP to exceed 1,200 square feet of accessory structure space to construct 2,820 square feet of Figure 1: Subject property 5550 Marsh Pointe Drive accessory buildings area • CUP to exceed 100 cubic yards of material to import 395 cubic yards of fill • variance to allow a home to be 45 feet into a side -yard abutting a public street where the ordinance requires 50 feet for a porch, steps and eave overhang. Notice of this application was published in both the City's official newspapers and mailed to all property owners within 750 feet of the property at least 10 days prior to the meeting. Page 2 BACKGROUND Context: In 2014, a previous property owner demolished the home and detached garage and the property has been left vacant since 2014. The adjacent properties to the north, west and south are all developed with single family homes. The homes to the north and northwest were developed as part of the Marsh Pointe subdivision and PUD. The properties to the east are developed with Minnewashta Elementary, the city's watertower and a large parking area. The property is unplatted. It contains mature trees and the proposal is subject to the City's tree preservation policy. A wetland exists to the north and the adjacent property contains all of the required buffer area for the wetland. The subject property must meet a 15 -foot setback from the buffer, but the setback only extends about 10 feet into the property from the north property line. Applicable Code Sections: Section 1201.03 Subd. 2 d. (4) of the zoning regulations allows the total area of all attached garages to exceed 1,200 square feet in area upon approval of a conditional use permit. Section 1201.03 Subd. 8 of the zoning regulations requires a conditional use permit to review any development that would require 100 cubic yards or more of material on any lot or parcel. The applicant has indicated that they would bring in about 400 cubic yards of material as shown on the attached plans. Section 1201.10 Subd. 5. of the zoning regulations requires all homes in the R -IA district to be setback no less than 50 feet from a side property line abutting a public street. Section 1201.03 Subd. 3 d. of the zoning regulations allows structures to be closer than the minimum front setback if the adjacent structures within the same block are closer. However, this section does not apply to the applicant's proposal because the portion of the property adjacent to Marsh Point is not a front yard, but rather a side yard abutting a public street. Other Zoning Requirements Regulation Required Proposed Conform? Lot Area (in square feet) 40,000 40,392 Yes Lot Width (in feet) 120 132 Yes Impervious Surface Coverage 33 % (max.) 32.4% Yes Height (in feet) Home 35 (max.) ±30 Yes Garage 15 (max.) 15 Yes Setbacks (in feet) Front 50 50 Yes Side Abutting Marsh Pointe Dr. 50 47* No Side 10 10 Yes Rear 50 50 Yes * Variance requested and discussed below -2- Page 3 ANALYSIS A. Accessory Structures in Excess of 1,200 square feet (CUPS Section 1201.03 Subd. 2. d. (4) of the zoning regulations provides specific conditions for granting conditional use permits for accessory space over 1200 square feet. The following is how the applicant's plans comply with the code: Dominance of the principal structure: The total area of accessory buildings (2,820 square feet) does not exceed the floor area (3,062 square feet on main level alone) above grade of the proposed home. Ten percent of lot area: The total area of accessory buildings (2,820 square feet) does not exceed 10 percent of the minimum lot size for the R -lA zoning district (.10 x 40,000 = 4,000 square feet). Consideration of other buildings, drainage, and landscaping: The proposed house and garage would minimize the appearance of the garage doors on all adjacent streets by locating the proposed detached garage parallel with the attached garage. The City Engineer has indicated that the applicant would grade the property to conform to the existing drainage pattern in the area. The applicant has indicated that they will landscape the property to frame the view of the house and garage and reinforce the lush neighborhood setting. They propose to remove three significant trees and would replace them with six new trees as required by the tree policy. Staff finds they may need to remove a few more significant trees depending on their final design and grading plan. If that is the case, the applicant would be required to plant additional trees to replace the significant trees lost. The final landscaping and grading details are required to be submitted with a building permit application. Similar and consistent design: The home and garage would be sided with the same materials and colors. The roof line of the garage would be less steep than that of the home in order to adhere to the maximum height allowed for accessory buildings, but staff finds that the appearance of both buildings would be similar and consistent. However, that standard is open to interpretation. B. Fill in Excess of 100 cubic yards (CUP). In their request letter, the applicant proposes to add approximately 395 cubic yards of fill to the site. Ten cubic yards is about one standard dump truck load, as a result, the proposed amount would equate to approximately 40 truckloads of dirt. The property is 18 feet lower on the north side than on the south side (near Smithtown Road). The applicant has oriented the home so that the garages are located toward the south (highest point on the lot) and a walkout basement and pool toward the north (lowest side of the lot). -3- Page 4 The applicant proposes to place the fill to level the construction pad for the home which allows construction of a main level courtyard on the east side of their home and also provides a gentler slope on the west side of the home between the driveway to the home's main entrance. The applicant also proposes a retaining wall (up to about 2.5 feet in height) to reduce the slopes on that side of the home. Issues related to a grading request are typically engineering related (erosion control, dust, truck traffic, etc.). The city engineer has reviewed the plans and has provided comments as shown in the attached memo. As previously stated, the applicant's proposal maintains the existing drainage pattern for the area. The applicant also shows a rain garden and underground vault system to contain and reduce the rate and volume of run -off, which is conceptually consistent with city requirements. Plans submitted with the building permit are required to include drainage calculations. Additionally, plans submitted with a building permit must have a construction - related traffic and parking plan to address the impact of construction workers on the neighborhood, a street sweeping contract, and any required permits from the watershed district. At a minimum, and as a condition of approval, staff recommend that all trucks hauling dirt and any large deliveries of construction materials access the site using the driveway on Smithtown Road to reduce the impact on the adjacent homes and on Marsh Pointe Drive. Also, the driveway to Smithtown Road must be removed prior to occupancy of the home on the lot. Staff also finds that because the property is not platted, standard drainage and utility easements around the periphery of the property have not been previously granted, nor has the right -of -way easement over the south 33 feet of the property (containing the street, boulevard area and utilities) ever been formally dedicated. Staff would recommend that these easements be acquired at this time. C. Variance to Front Yard Setback. The zoning regulations allow for variances upon showing that practical difficulties exist and that the request is consistent with the intent of the regulations. Section 1201.05 Subd. 2. b. of the Shorewood Zoning Code sets forth criteria for the consideration of variance requests. Staff reviewed the request according to these criteria, as follows: • Intent of comprehensive plan and zoning ordinance: The property owner would continue to use the property for residential purposes and proposes no uses on the site that would be inconsistent with either the intent of the residential land use classification or the district's allowed uses. • Practical difficulties: Practical difficulties include three factors, all three of which must be met. o Reasonable: A home with a front porch is a reasonable use of the property. Staff note the term "reasonable" is open to interpretation. The applicants are proposing to construct the maximum width house possible on the lot and propose the maximum amount of impervious surface allowed. 10 Page 5 o Self- Created: The applicant has oriented the home toward the west side of the lot facing the local street, the same as the homes to the north. This places the depth of the home at the narrowest side of the lot. This is a self - created situation. The lot is neither undersized nor narrower than required by the zoning district. The setbacks from east to west are total of 60 feet leaving 70 feet for construction of a home, which adequate for most home designs. o Essential Character: The area is a neighborhood containing homes that were all constructed closer than 50 feet to the property lines along Marsh Pointe Drive. The home across the street (26640 Smithtown Road) was constructed in 1965 and is about 24 feet from the property line. The properties to the north and northwest along Marsh Pointe Drive were approved with reduced setbacks as part of a PUD called "Marsh Pointe ". In exchange for reduced setbacks, the homes were constructed with greater wetland buffers for some of the wetlands in the subdivision. Two homes along Marsh Pointe Drive nearby (5570 and 5575) are constructed at 35.5 feet from the front property line along Marsh Point Drive. • Economic Considerations: The applicant has not proposed the variance based on economic considerations but to construct a porch to create a specific style for the home. is Figure 3: 5570 and 5575 Marsh Pointe Drive • Impact on Area: The property owners are not proposing anything that would impair an adequate supply of light and air to an adjacent property, increase the risk of fire or endanger public safety, or increase the impact on adjacent streets (after construction). Staff does recommend that the driveway and apron on Smithtown Road be removed and the area restored with turf prior to occupancy of the home. • Impact to public welfare and other improvements. The applicants' proposal is unlikely to impact or impair adjacent property values or the public welfare. However, staff would recommend that any approval of a variance include a condition that the applicants submit final drainage calculations to ensure the project complies with the city's storm water regulations. Staff finds that a condition to this effect would mean the project would not be injurious to other land or improvements to other downstream properties and the project would be unlikely to impact or impair the public welfare. • Minimum to Alleviate Difficulty. Staff reviewed the application by studying the impact to the traveling public and those properties to the north and west. Facing the home to Marsh Pointe Drive is in the interest of the neighborhood, but conclude the applicant has not shown practical difficulty and as a result, the variance is not the minimum action necessary to relieve the difficulty. -5- Page 6 If the commission finds a practical difficulty, then the variance request could be considered the minimum action to alleviate the difficulty. RECOMMENDATION Conditional use permits are reviewed according to standards listed in Section 1201.04 Subd 1. d. 1. of the zoning regulations and those specifically listed elsewhere in the zoning ordinance. Staff reviewed the criteria and find that the request for both conditional use permits meet the criteria. Specifically, that the requests are compatible with other uses in the area and would not tend to depreciate the area. Variances are reviewed according to the standards listed in 1201.05 Subd. 2. b.. Staff note that the applicants have met some of the variance standards better than others and do not believe the applicant has shown a practical difficulty. However, staff acknowledge that the standards are open to interpretation and the Planning Commission could reasonably find otherwise. Should the application be recommended for approval, staff recommends that the following conditions be included into any approving resolution forwarded to the City Council: 1. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit of the following, consistent with city regulations, policies and guidelines: • Final drainage calculations • A grading plan signed by an AELSGID professional licensed by the State of Minnesota, which also include the top and bottom of the retaining wall between Marsh Pointe Drive and the house • A tree preservation/landscaping plan signed by an arborist, landscape architect or forester. • Executed and recordable right -of -way and drainage and utility easements 2. All trucks hauling dirt and any large deliveries of construction materials shall access the site using the driveway on Smithtown Road to reduce the impact on the adjacent homes and on Marsh Pointe Drive. 3. Prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy, remove the driveway apron and restore the area to turf. Should the Planning Commission recommend approval of the conditional use permits but not the variance, staff would recommend adding another condition to the application: Prior to issuance of a building permit, revise the plans to remove the porch, step and overhang encroachment out of the 50 -foot setback from the property line along Marsh Pointe Drive. ATTACHMENTS: Location Map Engineer's memo Applicants Narrative and Plans I on �� A. s s "Pi [] JCD S s s s s s s s m s A. s S S s s s y I l l l y s S S S S r� ar `r e s s s s � Rd L Subject Property U) Y � S i S d9a Val OO it Val I s ? S La 00 .00 1,200 5550 Marsh Pointe Drive, Shorewood, MN TEA2 Architects representing Jodie & Paul Siegle, Owners Conditional Use Permit Application for Accessory buildings greater than 1200 s.f.: 1201.03 GENERAL PROVISIONS., Subd. 2., d. Accessory buildings, uses and equipment: (4) For the proposed Single Family house, the proposed Accessory building does not exceed three in number. While the proposed Accessory building is greater than 1200 s.f., the items below address the requirements for a C.U.P.: (a) The total area of accessory buildings (Attached Garage 976 s.f, Detached Garage 1844 s.f. _ 2820 s.f. Total) does not exceed the floor area of all stories above grade of the principal structure (3062 s.f. for house Main Level alone). (b.) The total area of accessory buildings does not exceed 10% of the minimum lot area for the R1A zoning district in which the property is located. For district R1A, minimum lot size is 40,000 s.f., therefore total area allowed is 4000 s.f. (2820 total s.f. proposed). (c.) The proposed Accessory building (garage) is to be located in close proximity to the proposed house. The gabled form and materials of the proposed garage will echo those of the house so that the garage and house will be seen as a united pair. Landscaping around the Garage will frame the view of the house and garage and reinforce the lush neighborhood setting. (d.) The architectural character of proposed accessory building is similar and consistent with the proposed house, as well as the other houses in the area. Both the proposed new house and proposed garage will use stained cedar wall shingles, divided lite windows and gabled roofs, similar to other homes in the neighborhood. The Owners' intent is to construct a high quality, beautiful home and garage which are finished with classic, character -rich materials — all of which will enhance the existing pleasant residential neighborhood. Traffic will not be effected by the location of the proposed Accessory building. The driveway accessing the proposed garage will be located —125' from the Smithtown Road corner —well clear of any conflicts with passing cars or bicycles. RECEIVED FEB 212018 CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5550 Marsh Pointe Drive, Shorewood, MN TEA2 Architects representing Jodie & Paul Siegle, Owners Conditional Use Permit Application for Depositing more than 100 cubic yards of fill: 1201.03 GENERAL PROVISIONS., Subd. 8. Land reclamation. a. We are proposing to add fill primarily in two areas — in the front yard (west side) as a graded transition to the front door, and on the east side as fill for a Main Level courtyard -- a feature that will not be visible to the public as it is screened by trees on the school parking lot side of this property. The total fill requested is 395 cubic yards. The topography at 5550 Marsh Pointe Drive slopes 18' south to north. Given the required 50' setbacks required from the property lines on Smithtown Road and Marsh Pointe Drive, the resulting land available for development is effected by this slope. The preference of the Siegle's is for their house to be part of the neighborhood — entering into the house Main Level at approximately the same elevation as other houses along Smithtown Road, and not to have the house Main Level lower in elevation ('built into the hillside'). We have done extensive studies to locate the proposed house in plan and elevation at the optimum location — balancing the best location relative to the neighborhood, with prudent stormwater management given this sloping site. If we 'push the house down' (so that the Main Level is significantly below 970'), we also have found that any useful Basement would not be able to 'walk -out' the north side, and (more importantly) may encounter the water table from the wetland to the north during flood events. Given our proposed Main Level elevation, in order to reach the west side front door from the street, we need to have enough fill added to make for a natural looking topographic transition from the Marsh Pointe Drive curb. In addition, the proposed courtyard on the east side of the house would require additional fill. As mentioned above, this courtyard will be hidden from public view as it is screened by trees and is on the side of the site next to a school parking lot. All drainage from this courtyard area will be engineered by our civil engineer to drain responsibly away from the neighboring property to the east. b. A finished grading plan is attached which shows that the proposed additional fill will not adversely affect adjacent properties. The type of fill to be used will be verified with all authorities and we will follow the specification in the code for: a program for rodent control, plan for fire control, general maintenance of the site, controls of vehicular ingress and egress and for control of material disbursed from wind or hauling of material to or from the site. =RECEIVED 5550 Marsh Pointe Drive, Shorewood, MN TEA2 Architects representing Jodie & Paul Siegle, Owners VARIANCE Request — Change Front Yard Setback on Marsh Pointe Drive from 50' to 45' Planning for this proposed residence has used the 50' front yard setbacks — front, corner side - yard, and rear -yard -- as specified for the R1A district. The entirety of our house and garage has been planned to fall within all of these required setbacks. We are asking only for the variance to address the front porch, where our planning extends 31" beyond the 50' setback line (75 s.f. of the porch is over the 50' setback line). We are requesting a 5' front yard setback reduction to 45' which would address the porch, steps and eave overhead. We had previously asked the City of Shorewood to rule on whether this property could be allowed to have reduced front yard setbacks, citing 1201.03, Subd. 3, d. " Where adjacent residential structures within the same block have front yard setbacks different from those required, the front yard minimum setback shall be the average of the adjacent structures ". Marie Darling, Planning Director, ruled that our property has no "adjacent structures ", noting that the property to the north is part of a Planned Unit Development, and therefore not a comparable property. We would like to note that the north - adjoined P.U.D. property has 35' setbacks (see attached diagram). Attached you will also find an aerial photo 'diagram' showing that all of the corner properties in this area do have closer a front yard setback than the 50' setback that is required for our property development. Our property is unique — it is a large lot that exists on a corner, its only adjoining neighbors being a school and a P.U.D. to the north, across a small wetland. It is a property that is a 'missing tooth' in the neighborhood which could easily have been developed as a use other than as a single family home. The goal of the Siegle's has always been to build a house on this property that fit into the fabric of this neighborhood, adding a finely crafted gabled house to fit in with the rest of the neighboring houses. Since all of the rest of the area houses are at least 5' closer to the street than our proposed house and garage, we feel that our request for a 5' reduction to the front yard setback for our front porch is reasonable, and reinforces the City's Comprehensive Plan to promote neighborhoods, and the fabric of the community. REC -EIVED FEB 212818 CITY OF SHOREWOOD D rn II 0 0 _n O fTi TI co C/) 2 N O -3 x N m o O� O 0 I° 0 0 cn CD -v Q Q 9 Q Q_ Vf A Q �a Q frQ m � N � 0 0 0 � X00 m o n L, 2 o m Zcn�l p m m nWZ MDo 0 Z 2 -1 -1 >00 am ADD N r r T >O DAD n(„� morn C)DO C) rnia �O W m N NDfc� � N � o V W O o� D O p 0 Z 0 i D 2 D C) D m C) D n c 0 Z 3 x+ 9 O Z ' y m. 0 n m SMITHTOWN ROAD Vi I WZy DDS �ZL, vG), >;I CI DN i i I NA Nrn ..' oL rn �° a oA N 0 a 0 :Ko ZZ n m = o— m rn f"1 —I O , InAM PI Oz CFO ogz 0 �yl 0o L I ............ . . ... . --- - - - - - - - - - - - - ......... L -A .......... - - -- ----- -- '0 --------------- --------- ----- -------- 5, go --------------------------------- ----------- RM --rq 0 n LAJ m 0 cb\ - ----------- - — -- — -- — -- — -- — -- — - -- --- ---------- - -- -- ------------ --- --------- -------------------------- - -- --- ------ - - - -- ------------- - ----------------- ---- ---- > Not for Construction g CD { L, S _JAL- - xg ' fo.. I~4. Y y `A I i t CORNER NEIGHBOR t� ter r• J kon R� ` - b 'a►.__ art Aj Vol, vp { r4-- a � '{ a� c ., <' NEIGHBORHOOD AERIAL r F} DIAGRAM SHOWING SETBACKS OF PROPOSED c HOUSE AND NEIGHBORING HOUSES CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY for- Jodie & Paul Siegle NOTES -of- 5550 MARSH POINTE DRIVE - Field survey was completed by E.G. Rud and Sons, Inc. on 8/11/17. - Bearings shown are on Hennepin County Coordinate System. - The right -of -way width shown for Smithtown Road is per the Hennepin County Half Section Map. - Total parcel area = 1.00 acre. 955.. 5 / n n n .r i i i.........r ...� i j :': BENCHMARK 1 r \ 1 / \ / \ I / /� ••.........•. 955': 8'. r< 1 K ••....x950.81 BENCHMARK: _ r •• '•.. : : :: L<. I_\ J \ l I \ 1 MNDOT CONTROL POINT "1004 L" 8SS56 c r 950 x950.50....... ...: •" 950. 51 .................. :.......... GSID STA. #94227 `9 $55,5 69x.......<..: r...... x951.30' • .................. ...... , ............................ ELEV= 967.971 (NAVD 88) 6 :- FN1D•-1 /2°"' ........... (EAST..B. -RODS -DESCC:) . ................... : :FND 1P .................. OPEN.... Br�� ©�. ��..!!�i� ......... .. a7. `l. LS �{253�F1 : .............3 x956.06 x955.31 - a .......... x 95 9 ..." m d lb..,• G BOUNDARY NOTE X956 9 i.. 954 ..........:.�•' I 0� ��' QJ Jv k x956:72..... - �5 ..957 -. qs I Q Q R 6 56 0 OX \0 s ASH 6 BOX �f2 Gi ` g r�Q�'.•''cQ �JGF The property description provides no basis 0 �gQ:• P P Y P P BO 1 �••••••..6... for bearings. The adjacent plot of MARSH ASH"5 -• ASH 6 ° r SPRUCE POINTE, describes the common lines of the q Ok 7 ASH 12 I 6"' So So Q ° . "y BO S 2 ASH i9rJ P• .....••` 5 : • c� 6h 1 1 surveyed premises as being parallel to the 1 e� °• S qS P • •LO `a 6`' ��O west and south lines of the Southwest `��' 509s�' "' s y1p•• "•....- I �CF Fs 0 0 961.67 Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section I q• S s• 95a 961.31 32. For this survey, we used the same H.6,�y� ASH 6 ASH .6 95� WAL) l�F, �C� ....... principle as said MARSH POINTE. 959 �O 958: 7.. ?... SP •.cE • _ 1.83 .� ••. AS. ....................... .....•Spit m ASH •8. .... -• 961.74 x961.99 �qsb..• qsH 8.959........ <r_ > �:. s... .....960 9 s r ... ....._...{ > ... . NOTES 11 PR W •EAD �i" SPRU 6 so ... ... _ ..... . s�....... • GASH 8 DEAD ...961 ...... 962•....... °........ 5 U 6 961•..... w ... - L \ 4111 . Field survey as completed b E.G. m Y P Y m SASH s, j .............. ..,....`..i`..................c -v °o - •SPftu 6.......,96 Rud and Sons, Inc. on 08/11/17. *BOX 12 ............... �BOx.1.2 .. \ � `.... { ... Bearings shown are on an assumed " " 6963 \ �•..•N 'sPRU s datum. Q'00 ... \_N1 7....•• x963.26 964 ... m \i sUpE s4 I 963.72 r•- Curb shots are taken at the top and 6�ea 9 ° -'"° : ::: g .... 9 3. 5 _ S UCE 6� °: x964.,,6 back of curb. w 6 rn 65 ^ 3 •• g 966 �•� x963 7 N I 67.. .. � ...................... 4UCF : i` SP CE 6 g This survey was prepared without the ~ x X4'90 P ............. Y P P 964....., �.... SPRU CE O '. benefit of title work. Additional :: .. CEj s- o r2g 66:62•.......... L.... /'�.�.� ..... 96a...SPCE :"7 -�SP CE .. . easements, restrictions and/or encumbrances may exist other than those 965 m ....969 "..... .�, SP CE shown hereon. Survey subject to revision r,_Z' 1�-... •... m :. upon receipt of a current title e 0 .. • Jc� �......0 ................. SP4CE _ commitment or an attorney's title opinion. 9594 ........... �S' CE fl96 E BbX 6 .• .. / I OCE 14 `... 6. ** For the purposes of this survey the = .4 / •..........., sP sP UeE'•14 Easterly line is determined to be a 967. s ASH '8 ti }� 1� m ` ' "" • 971•... side setback. x 69..87 SR Urc 14 67.85 cy- I 'rl x967.8/` 966.89 BOX I.G.- •....' -..... \ SpF#LICE IRON 8 L•I 96 969 1 912 ................... ,s I\' E72 `: 8. WALNUT 14 m� • 8 ° ti 3 #WALNUT R m uCE *P CE'89 m 0 9. UJ Zi 70.13 �j0 0 6 Sp :� S4 CE 6 6 � 3 0 -50 - -- BLDSB -- - 0 o N � 1.25 :�SPRUC 8 x969.46 u' o ^ x970 8 . n I SOX •0 U g 9) ! EDAR 12 2X 70.48 0...: . N j 9 1. 2' •.• .......................... Sp CEDAR 1 .45 ...... .• x970 50 i Rice 9��... �o$� '41 \J 9 m FND IP I S°QG 76 �0 9 • --ROCK 1 1m 7 XI: �LS #19840 CE r ;ENTRANCE ; °`� .CEDAR -ID- 71.62 6 }rr -T g= -� SPRUCE / _ +191, 9'' SMITHTOWN ROAD PER- CS i /\� \�� :FNb IP 1 ° COUNTY MAPPING • Cb ° :LS #41578 / -SW CORNER OF SE1 /4 -NW11/4 r7 OIIN! "' 9, rn I L�II V.; ::: AlHA9 OI1;4 -..TM7 i SEC.32 -T117N -R23W co �',•. \ 972.2 71.83 1 : OIIW I (29 RODS DESC.) 7. •.05 •• �.. ` 972 o 972.36 J72.82 _ N89'00'1 YE 478.50 I ,S89.00'f3 "#r 132.00 0 -SOUTH LINE OF SE1 /4- NW1 /4,n: x972.56 < 91ry� 7<--l-7 g -< x973:00 SEC.32- T117N- R23W ° ` (WEST 8�2ODS DESC. SMIT�ITOWN ROAD `lNV E =958.9 [] J 72.65 12 °INV 5= 968.5' I �2 �2 • __% X52 sjS - - Ss l�C EiV E� 6' PROPERTY DESCRIPTION MAR 12 2018 LEGEND (Description per Title Commitment prepared by Old Republic National CITY OF SHOREWOOD Title Insurance Company, File No. 13C3709REO prepared on 11- 19 -13.) DENOTES IRON MONUMENT FOUND AS LABELED That part of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 32, © DENOTES MISCELLANEOUS MANHOLE Township 117 North, Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian, described OS DENOTES SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE as follows: Beginning at a point in the South line of Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 32, 29 rods East of the Southwest corner D4 DENOTES WATER VALVE of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 32, • ................. •••••......•. DENOTES RETAINING WALL thence North a distance of 20 rods, thence East a distance of 8 rods; ........................... thence South a distance of 20 rods to the South line of said Southeast DENOTES EXISTING CONTOURS Quarter of Northwest Quarter; thence West a distance of 8 rods to point of OHw DENOTES OVERHEAD WIRE beginning. Hennepin County, MN. E .........D.ENOTF.S OVERHEAD WIRE DENOTES POWER POLE > DENOTES SANITARY SEWER 11 DENOTES CATCH BASIN Location: CITY OF SHOREWOOD [ :S DENOTES CURB STOP __] DENOTES BITUMINOUS SURFACE e DENOTES MAILBOX Scale I"= 40' Drawn By: SNN Project Manager: KRA ,lob No.: 17624BT o Denotes Iron Set 1 • Denotes Iron Found Bearings shown are on an assumed datum. l hereby certify that this plan, survey or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that l am a duly Registered Land Surveyor under the laws IVA F. G, 8110 P. SIONSIP INC. of the State of Mi nesota. Dated this 22nd day of August 2017 Professional Land Surveyors www.egrud.com 990 5th Avenue SE, Suite 2 License No. 45356 Hutchinson, MN 55350 Tel. (320) 587 -2025 Fax (320) 587 -2595 FIVD �f' ~------- - - - - -- 2 7. - - - - 7- 10.5' .: I OPEN - - - - 53' x 956.91 :�� - - - - - -- 954 - - -- .p ,Qyy,- I x q� I 012" B 'DER s PR R CE z - _ > E R 10 u B ELD H - SPRU _ �_ SP�i UC�s' �� - -- 012 -956-- _ i x - d�b� 9 _ 5 �r� SPR�U ���b b� i50 � ,_ - -- - - - -- _ - q5a_- - sPRUC� 7- 961.31 95 $.9 _ 1.83 k � - - _ _ 9 SPU�E �\ 59 . A 17 9a* � x ��III x958_..64"'" PRUCEI 961.74 .g _ -9 9b0' - -- - - - -_j, _ _ � �8 EA SPRUCE - - - -- x960.47 "r62_- SPRUCE e$ (DEAD) - _961'" _ -- 9 _ �: 961' - - _ - *SPRUCE 2" B LDER - -__ - 012" B DE - - -t- CD 01 •I _ - d - rn, *SPitUCE -N� 65.24 -'R 963.06 - - -' l SRU CE - 64_ . 1 R96: - -- -966 52 � 965.36 i9 x 96.50 sdRUC 6� 9�j3.1 N- -965'' 966} - -x� 6' x 964.36 x 963.70' r sP CE - 964 - -- �'Qb4.90 _ "___ - -- - ,- '- 1" " - -- - - - --" i SPR E 11 S" CD. /' I ------ -_' - -_, p C SCE i66.62,, - - -''j -- '.968 - - -t_ V) SPR E 965- -r- 969 --" I "' S UCE \` SPRU 96 -- - -' i SPRUCE LDER x 969.5 19659 - - -�9 i R , PR E �9 02X- 1 OXEI�DER ro _ 971>4 .{ 67.83.\ x 971 f91 x ' x 967'87 ELDER'' v � PRU'CE ' =W` 96----------- .9' r ; 2RUCE ` r I -� - ��, 11G� F� NU I �� O D - r �17 70.13 0.07' , x 972,27 �< O. i �----------- - - - - -� SPR E x 972.44 x 971,.7 �\ k PRUCE r 0' 41' ' ? �x 972.05) x r +101'r�' ¢ E R ` 970.89 , x 972.58 CEDAR 971.0 x 970.4 x 9Z2.Q6 R' EDAR - - -- _ -- - - - - -- x 972.13 50 \�\ 71.68 x\971.70 9 EDAR FIND IP J 71.62 LS -&1.9810- - -S�bl TQ�/1,�f�QAD- - - - PER 0 1�-fdl`APPING E I FAD IP 971.4 ,p Xr LS` #41578�, +9 x 970.61v �� ��� �� - uu�� ?�1 x 971 110 - -- �. - � _- X870'41 I / - ? J � / x9/2. , r 970.92 1 �� 971.83 n - -- Cl- _ 97 .05 0 - __ - -'� 972.36 x 972.70 972.78 0O -- - _ _SMITHTOWN.- ROA_D_ q���b 9 6 -� ---=- �9J289 - - - - -- Not for Construction D ii 0 0 -o 0 a cn z rri m N � a = z RECEIVED MAR 1 9 ?n!R CITY OF SHOREWOOD RECEIVED MAR 12 2018 CITY OF Milli= No ``-rte 1.L,is��,Riw Illlullill o C go ro l� Lower o Flor Plan �� scue:'�» =,• -o• o,rloo., ,rand First Floor Plan � sutP� dS; = r -o• a Irloo. � Irs,�d S TEA2 ARCHITECTS 24 W's 143nd SI r.5�.` p'hs, rn�eS'10 e�zyz.==n ,— 132,1- O V L N r- 0 V - --'-- ----- ----- L r - --- -- i G L.I.. I I 4— I I G Z PrgM Nome Siegle Residence I I l 5550 Marsh Pointe Drive ' I Shorewood, MN sr<ei nk I, ------- Floor - - - - -- I Plans I -- I — I L—=- -- ---- - - - - -J Isc�a Mee zalaa,a a[ - '- '6V4, ED — FE.B CITY OF. SNOREWOOD I1' IX Sheer N—b, Setond Floor Plan A 1.1 • I �PYnghl T Archaean 6B-1- Exterior Elevation- North SCALE: %. — 1. 0. d—floo BeteBo 2T-4- Exterior Elevation - West Garage Floor Plan SCALE: 1'.0'e e100- 9oroga M A R 1 iZO 18 27M St M4 :11. ,,S,, 55410 612.924.2E ­11,z,a2,111'(­, o,, r_ 0 4— ;A 0 %J 0 4— 0 z P.J.d N- Siegle Residence 5560 Marsh Pointe Drive Garage Elevations g-A2.0 C,pyHghl TEA2 Arrfit a min Lim 2T-4- Exterior Elevation - West Garage Floor Plan SCALE: 1'.0'e e100- 9oroga M A R 1 iZO 18 27M St M4 :11. ,,S,, 55410 612.924.2E ­11,z,a2,111'(­, o,, r_ 0 4— ;A 0 %J 0 4— 0 z P.J.d N- Siegle Residence 5560 Marsh Pointe Drive Garage Elevations g-A2.0 C,pyHghl TEA2 Arrfit a FACE OF MALL SAVE EDGE — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — I 8:12 812 COPPER RIDGE CAP- 0:12 8:12 8: 12 — — — — — — — — ___J EAVE EDGE FACE OF Z—� Garage Roof Plan SCALE: '/," - V-0- L ) SCALE: '/,' = 1' -0' ME= —N W, I 2724 V""t 4 , fd St �,Li, MN 5S410 612 929,Mco I--, L-j *z 4- H • L- 0 0 Z P.',e N.— Siegle Residence 5550 Marsh Pointe Dd- Sh.--d, 'AN Garage Plans 1--s C,—M 4G 2/M018 VAMCfAFFUC. 3112/=8 Sheet Number • WSB 701 Xenia Avenue South I Suite 300 1 Minneapolis, MN 55416 1 (763) 541 -4800 Memorandum To: Patti From: Alyson Fauske, PE, City Engineer Date: March 19, 2018 Re: Planning Case No. 18 -04, 5550 Marsh Pointe Drive Based on the plans submitted by TEA2 Architects dated 2/21/18 and received 2/21/18 1 offer the following comments and recommendations: 1. The plan indicates that the grades will be adjusted up to three feet from the existing condition across the site. The high side of the property is along Smithtown Road and drops approximately 18 feet to the north towards a wetland. The proposed grading maintains the existing drainage pattern. 2. The grading plan must be signed by a professional licensed by the Minnesota Board of AELSGID. 3. Drainage calculations for the proposed surface water management improvements must be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval. 4. Note the top and bottom of wall elevations for the retaining wall between Marsh Pointe Drive and the house. Building a legacy — your legacy. Equal Opportunity Employer I wsbeng.com C:\ Users \phelgesen\AppDalaLLocal\Miemsoft\windows \Temporary Internet Files \Content.Oullook\2LSYMYLK\CUP 5550 Marsh Pointe 2018_03_16.docx