Loading...
08-28-18 Planning Commission Agenda CITY OF SHOREWOOD COUNCIL CHAMBERS PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD TUESDAY AUGUST 28, 2018 7:00 P.M. A G E N D A CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL / (LIAISON) SCHEDULE GORHAM (Aug) ______ EGGENBERGER (Dec) ______ DAVIS (Nov) ______ RIEDEL (Oct) ______ MADDY (Sep) ______ 1. APPROVAL OF AGENDA 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES July 17, 2018  3. PUBLIC HEARINGS A)7:10 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING – PRELIMINARY PLAT AND LOT AREA VARIANCE Applicant: City of Shorewood Location: 22000 Stratford Place 4. OTHER BUSINESS A) MINOR SUBDIVISION AND SETBACK VARIANCE Applicant: Richard Denman Location: 5865 Glencoe Road B) MINOR SUBDIVISION Applicant: Chris Stephen Location: 4865 Ferncroft Drive 5. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR 6. REPORTS Council Meeting Report  Draft next meeting agenda  7. ADJOURNMENT CITY OF SHOREWOOD COUNCIL CHAMBERS PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD TUESDAY, JULY 17, 2018 7:00 P.M. MINUTES CALL TO ORDER Chair Maddy called the meeting to order at 7:02 P.M. ROLL CALL Present: Chair Maddy; Commissioners Eggenberger, Gorham, and Riedel; Planning Director Darling; and, Council Liaison Johnson Absent: Commissioner Davis 1. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Eggenberger moved, Riedel seconded, approving the agenda for July 17, 2018, as presented. Motion passed 4/0. 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES  June 5, 2018 Gorham moved, Eggenberger seconded, approving the Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of June 5, 2018, as presented. Motion passed 3/0/1 with Riedel abstaining due to his absence at the meeting. 3. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. PUBLIC HEARING – PUD AMENDMENT REGARDING BUILDING HEIGHT Applicant: Lennar Homes and Gonyea Homes Location: Minnetonka Country Club PUD Chair Maddy opened the Public Hearing at 7:05 P.M. noting the procedures used in a Public Hearing. Director Darling explained that Lennar and Gonyea Homes have requested a PUD amendment for the Minnetonka Country Club which is located between Smithtown Road and Yellowstone Trail. She reviewed the development and structures in the area. The PUD amendment request is for the building height of certain homes in this development to be different than others in the City and to measure height from the average between the highest and lowest points of grade adjacent to the home to the average between the peak and eave. Staff finds that the applicant has minimized the number of homes proposed and minimized the impact of the greater height on the adjacent community and recommends approval. Commissioner Riedel asked for clarification of what a villa lot is. Planning Director Darling explained that the villa lots are empty-nester style homes that are on smaller lots that have common maintenance. Commissioner Riedel asked if there were any homes that would not have a walk-out basement design. CITY OF SHOREWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING July 17, 2018 Page 2 of 4 Planning Director Darling stated that there are some that do not have walk-out basements but, those are excluded from the PUD amendment request. Commissioner Riedel asked if the City had gotten any feedback from the residents that were contacted. Planning Director Darling stated that the City has not heard from any residents. Commissioner Riedel asked if there have been any other instances of going above the 35-foot height limitation or variances granted to allowed it. Planning Director Darling stated that Shorewood Landings exceeds the 35-foot limitations but is not a single-family unit. She noted that she did not find any height variances in her research. Commissioner Riedel noted that the letter from the applicant mentions that they felt the language in the code was misleading. Planning Director Darling stated that the code language is consistent, however, you have to know where to look and has added this item to her list for the Planning Commission to look at clarifying to avoid future confusion. Mark Sonstegard, Lennar Homes, stated that they had reviewed the PUD agreement and the code where they looked under building height. He stated that they even met with Building Official Pazandak to review the plans and were asked if they were aware of the 35-foot rule. They told him yes and it was not until the first two-story building permit was in for a walk-out lot at which time they realized they had missed the terms “average land grade” which left them a bit confused. He stated at that point they contacted Planning Director Darling. He agrees with Planning Director Darling that this portion of the code is a little confusing. Commissioner Riedel asked what the total height is from the lowest point that they are asking for. Steve Ellefsen, Architectural Manager, Lennar Homes, stated that the homes fall between 38 and 39 feet when measured from the lowest grade. Chair Maddy opened the Public Testimony portion of the Public Hearing at 7:23 P.M. There being no public comment, Chair Maddy closed the Public Testimony portion of the Public Hearing at 7:24 P.M. Chair Maddy stated that he agrees with the applicant that the code is misleading and feels it should be discussed for future clarification. Riedel moved, Gorham seconded, recommending approval of the PUD Amendment Request from Lennar Homes and Gonyea Homes. Motion passed 4/0. Planning Director Darling stated that this item will come before the City Council on their August 13, 2018 agenda. 4. OTHER BUSINESS A. DISPOSAL OF PUBLIC PROPERTY Applicant: City of Shorewood Location: 22000 Stratford Place CITY OF SHOREWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING July 17, 2018 Page 3 of 4 Planning Director Darling stated that the City has been approached by someone who would like to buy a vacant piece of property located at 22000 Stratford Place. She explained that the property is part of the nd Woodhaven 2 Addition subdivision that was platted in 1979 and originally housed a well house. She stated that the well house was demolished in 2008 and the well was sealed and the parcel has been vacant since then. She stated that there is a stormwater management feature located on the property that would need to remain. Staff is recommending approval. Commissioner Riedel asked if there was any potential for liability with contaminated soils, for example. Planning Director Darling stated that the risk would be fairly minimal since the City knows what the property has been used for and has been disclosed to the potential property owner. Commissioner Eggenberger asked if there was any reason why a home could not be built on the property. Planning Director Darling stated that the preliminary research shows that it would be large enough for a home. Chair Maddy asked how the City would guarantee it would be getting a fair price since it is not being sold on the open market. Planning Director Darling stated that the City Assessor did an assessment on the property to come up with the price. Commissioner Riedel asked if there would be any reason to put the lot on the open market. Commissioner Gorham asked if the City had a procurement officer and stated that it feels like it shouldn’t just be a “first come, first served” with anything the City owns. Planning Director Darling noted that the City Administrator has been fulfilling that role but, doesn’t have the official title. Commissioner Riedel asked if there would be any reason for the City to retain this land for parkland or other use. Planning Director Darling responded that the City had reviewed the site for a potential park some time back and decided against a park in that area. Chair Maddy opened the floor for public comment at 7:37 p.m. There being no public comment, he closed the public testimony portion of the meeting at 7:37 p.m. The Planning Commission discussed the price of the lot and the potential for perceived impropriety that this is an inside deal. Planning Director Darling noted that if this moves forward, the lot would need to be replatted and the legal description changed from an outlot to a lot and block legal. She stated that it will also require a variance to allow for a single-family dwelling to be built on it. Gorham moved, Eggenberger, to recommend that the City proceed with the sale of 22000 Stratford Place. Motion carried 4/0. 5. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR None CITY OF SHOREWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING July 17, 2018 Page 4 of 4 6. REPORTS • Liaison to Council Council Liaison Johnson noted that there were no Planning Commission items on the most recent Council meeting. He stated that the largest discussion item was the surface material for the Badger Park playground. He stated that the Parks Commission had recommended wood fiber, but the Council opted to go with the poured in place rubber. He stated that the Council also voted to conduct speed sampling on Smithtown Road near Minnewashta Elementary School as well as a section of County Road 19 between Minnetonka Drive and Highway 7. • Draft Next Meeting Agenda The Planning Commission discussed the language clarification that may be needed as discussed in the PUD item from earlier in the agenda. Director Darling stated that she will conduct a survey of other cities as part of the research for a possible code amendment on this issue. Director Darling asked for volunteers to present at the upcoming Council meetings. Commissioner Gorham – August Commissioner Maddy – September Commissioner Riedel – October Commissioner Davis - November Commissioner Eggenberger – December Council Liaison Johnson stated that he had one more update regarding the application to open a tattoo establishment. The Council approved the application, but chose to remove all language that related to body piercing. Director Darling stated that for the August 28, 2018 meeting agenda, there will possibly be two minor subdivision requests. She stated that there would be a work session meeting with the Council to discuss the Comprehensive Plan on August 13, 2018. 7. ADJOURNMENT Riedel moved, Gorham seconded, adjourning the Planning Commission Meeting of July 17, 2018, at 8:00 P.M. Motion passed 4/0. O rH V 0 0 rn 0 rn N ? a1 • o o M � O � U O O � � U O 3 °o O a3i O � � � 3 O Cd • 1N- N .--r U o �[ N U tr)� I A O W O U U O C� O O U bA a O U Q Q 00 rl O N 0 N 0 fC$ 0 it 42 VI N V 5, S� cd N V1 0 0 0 N N z F-i �i A 11 =J1 U i • Cd N i Cd N ^N I--I O a z a W z 0 U N H ti A N 3 O N z Gn °zoo 06 a °o 0 a,•:-,� �' ,DTs W U O O O N z F-i �i A 11 =J1 U i • Cd N i Cd N ^N I--I O a z a W z 0 U cd o w., �U Cd � bb O f ,. •� ct N � O Q Cd O 0 1 N C �U O O O U � U N ti N 3 O N Gn °zoo 06 a °o 0 a,•:-,� �' ,DTs O O O N W 0 $a, "O tn V) .O H Q U cd o w., �U Cd � bb O f ,. •� ct N � O Q Cd O 0 1 N C �U O O O U � Page 2 BACKGROUND Context: In 1979, the subject property was created as an outlot for utility purposes and developed with a well house. In 2008, the city sealed the well and demolished the well house. The property has remained vacant. The property contains mature trees and is subject to tree preservation policy. A tree preservation plan would be required with the building permit. The site has no property within a shoreland or floodplain overlay district. On July 23, 2018, the City Council approved a purchase agreement for the property. ANALYSIS Two sections of the Shorewood City Code state that outlots are unbuildable: Section 1201.02 (Definitions) of the zoning ordinance reads: OUTLOT. A lot remnant or parcel of land left over after platting, which is intended as open space or other use, or which is reserved for future development and for which no building permit shall be issued. Section 1202.05. (Design Standards) subd. 2. e. of the subdivision regulations reads: e. Lot remnants / outlots.... Building permits shall not be issued for outlots or remnants. Consequently, before the city may sell the property to a buyer to construct a home on the lot, the City must alter the legal description to a lot /block legal description. The only means to alter the legal description is to replat the property and assign it a lot/block legal description. A. Preliminary Plat. Lot Width/Area: Section 1202.05 Subd. 2. c. of the subdivision regulations requires that all lots have adequate frontage on a city approved street to accommodate a driveway and required driveway setbacks. Additionally, section 1201.12 of the zoning regulations has specific area and width requirements for newly created lots. The current and proposed lot areas and widths are shown below: - • _ " _ kR•- `F - yy9d 2 b f 'i std v EXISTING: -� f k ADDRE55. , , -' a PROPOSED _ : [REQUIRED 1N�R``1C —F Lot Area Lot Width* Lot Area Lot Width* Lot Area Lot Width* Lot 1 15,203 sf 89.89 ft 15,203 ** sf 89.89 ** ft 20,000 sf 100 ft *As measured at the front setback "variance requested Because the lot does not meet the requirements for lot width or area, variances are required and discussed below. Stormwater Run -Off. The site contains a drainage feature for off -site storm water run -off and that feature would remain on the property. Construction of a new home on the lot would require additional rate control based on the amount of impervious surface proposed. Easements: Section 1202.05 Subd. 6 requires 10 -foot drainage and utility easements around the periphery of each lot and additional easements over the top of any utility lines. The plat includes 10 foot easements along the east and west boundaries of the lot and a 15 -foot easement on the north property line consistent with the original plat. The plat also includes an easement over the storm -water feature on the south side of the lot. This is consistent with city code requirements. Page 3 Access /Lot Frontage: Section 1202.05 Subd. 2. C. requires that every lot have adequate frontage on a city approved street to accommodate a driveway and section 1201.03 subd. 5 the zoning regulations requires a 40 -foot driveway setback from the intersection of property lines at the corner and a five -foot setback from side or rear property lines. The property is a corner lot and provides adequate area to construct a driveway to Apple Road consistent with setbacks. No driveway access would be permitted to Stratford Place due to the presence and location of the storm -water feature. Utilities: The lot has access to both municipal water (through the City of Chanhassen) and sewer (through the City of Shorewood) and the applicant is required to install services for the new home. A right -of -way permit issued by the City of Shorewood would be required for the work in the right -of- way as well as approval from the City of Chanhassen. B. Lot Area/Width Variances. The zoning regulations allow for variances upon showing that practical difficulties exist and that the request is consistent with the intent of the regulations. Section 1201:05 Subd. 2. b. of the Shorewood Zoning Code sets forth criteria for the consideration of variance requests. Staff reviewed the request according to these criteria, as follows: Intent of comprehensive plan and zoning ordinance: The proposal to sell the property for construction of a single - family home would be consistent with the residential land use designation in the comprehensive plan and the R -1C zoning district. 2. Practical difficulties: Practical difficulties include three factors, all three of which must be met: a) reasonableness; b) circumstances unique to the property and not caused by the landowner; and c) maintenance of the essential character of the area. a. Reasonable: Use of the property for a single - family home is a reasonable use in the R -1C zoning district. b. Unique /Self - Created: The property was created smaller to allow for a public purpose that is now obsolete. The city has no additional land to add to the size of the property. C. Essential Character: The addition of one single- family home would not alter the essential character of the area. 3. Economic Considerations: The variance is not a means to increase the value of the lot but to allow a private buyer the ability to use the lot. 4. and 5. Public Welfare /Injurious to Other Property. The City is not proposing anything that would impair an adequate supply of light and air to an adjacent property, increase the risk of fire or endanger public safety, unreasonably diminish or impair values in the neighborhood. 6. Staff concludes that the requested variance is the minimum necessary to alleviate the practical difficulties. Page 4 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the preliminary plat and variances to lot area and width for the City of Shorewood subject to the condition that the buyer obtain the necessary permits and submit the following: 1. a storm water management plan 2. a tree preservation plan 3. approval from the City of Chanhassen to connect to municipal water 4. payment of park dedication and sewer and water connection fees ATTACHMENTS Location map Preliminary and Final Plat Correspondence received S \Pl mningkPlanning Files Applimfion512018 Casesl.Sale of 22000 Stratford Ace1PC memo plat 8 27 18.docc 2E]M]08 00 �19A J 'OMASSVHNVHO U G) Cn fi /CJaadOJd fi It t a fi fi fi fi fi fi fi fi fi e-j UidJeE) 7A CD Q 3 000' l 005 o5z o N SITE Outlet A, Woodhaven Second Addition, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota, NOTE: This property is Tonens. PROPERTY SUMMARY 1. Subject property's address is 22000 Stratford Piece. 2. Subject property's property identification number is 35- 117 -23-33 -0026 3. The gross area of the subjectproperty is 15,203 Square Feet or 0.349 acres. 4. The subject property is zoned R -1C, Single -Family (20,000 sq. R), per the City of Shorewood zoning map dated January, 2017. 5. There are no buildings on the subject property X39[ MVE11911M 1. The bearing system Is based on the recorded plat of Woodhaven Second Addition, having an assumed bearing of S00`27'37'W for the West line of Outlet A 2. Th e vertical datum is based on NAVD88. Th e originating benchmark Is 2706 B, referenced form the MODOT Geodetic Database. Elev.= 967.833 Benchmark #1 TN at South end of property on the north side of Stratford Place. Elev. = 970.24 3. Fieldwork was completed on 6115/2D18 Lot 1, Block I= 15,203 Square Feet or 0.349 acres ADDRESSES Owner. City of Shorewood Enginser)Sunieyor. YVSB B Associates, Inc. 701 Xenia Avenue South, Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 I� nF)n/1N1/- \1A) \/ A F-N F\ITI/-\NI f \V� \UVIVV VV I /--tUUI I IVIV / FD MAGNETIC DRAW DETECTION UNDER BITUMINOUS DRRIMAY / ONN ER: DANNY D FISK JUDICIAL IAN DMARK PURSUANT ADDRESS:610D APPLE RD TO TORRENS CASE NO. 18479 � — PID: 3s„7- z333-0037 / EDGE OF BITUMINOUS DRNEVVAY , — — — — — — — — — — — — FD 11Z IP V-� r,0 I16^ ' —� r — — — — — 30" % O RIA1958.74 INV: NA 11 \ I PROPOSED DRAINAGE err \ \ 959 / UTILITY EASEMENT b \ / / LOT 1 ; O' q BLOCK 1 y �� OWNER:JUSTINS CATHERINE DECOSSE V9 II�` �d, 12" ADDRESS: M20STRATFORDPL — ��•(( \\ OWNER:CITY OFSHOREWOOD PIP. 35-117- 23330012 I III ml II' ,� �� ADDR ESS: 2z. ST.F.R D PL I I 96 PIP.35�117- 2333-0026 ik 12- '-WALL. III \ J \ 98r PROPOSEDDRAINAGEy 96? \` rB UiILRY EASEMENT _ �1 03 ' O — 965 °lip �I \ 1 ^y O 4J py°: O ` 968 `70.24_�v` 1 1� ` 564 V] a I — 969- FD12'IP L_�7,17 _—� _ -- LEGEND X 97 .970 - C.BRG. =N78� 8 94 ;z2 \0^\ 49 / 0 FD MONUMENT O —r 6_i S SETNIO14UMEW Q 8 Qs SA141TARY MANHOLE RIM 9''qq99 °0 -� RIt.1: 967.77 -\r INV: Eb27 957.96\ \ INV: S7 962.22 X94 D FLAREDEND SECTION C INV: VV4 7 957.96 v'TI \Pll I VI \V i)IL Av`L �n \ `� g`ii' \ / ® CATCH MS 11 1 L Milt: 967.54 ® STORM MANHOLE 1 IIfJVE 15RCP Mi.49 / X WATER VALVE IiJY: W 15RCP 961.49 -� WATER HYDRANT �e Q WATER MANHOLE RIM: 967.97 INV: S12RCP 964.22 -_� / K • WOOD FENCE 771 CURB A140 GUTTER -- —~ alp ` _ RII ^7:967.91 INV. E15RCP 963.91 l J DECIDUOUBTREE PROJECT NO. OWNER:JORDAN BABIGAILGAOOR INV: N12 RCP 96196 r•I ADDRESS: 22015 STRATFORD PL FD 121P PID:3S117- 23330023 EVERGREENTREE P: 012131 -000 jr, I V, 2 D V DOCK, , t A / DRAWING TYPE w- Preliminary Plat EC" �, / // DRAFTER AUG 0 r i JRH f e 1 r 11. G It .i .Jl LJ_.I REVIEWED N DATE N 8/10/18 Graphic Scale (in feet) SHEET 0 20 40 , inch =too feet 1 OF 1 KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: That City of Shorewood, a Minnesota municipal corporation, fee owner, of the following described property situated In the County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota, to wit: Oldlot A, Woodhaven Second Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Has caused the same to be surveyed and platted as WOODHAVEN 7TH ADDITION, and does hereby dedicate the easements as shown on this plat for drainage and utility purposes only. In witness whereof said City of Shorewood, a Minnesota municipal corporation, has caused these presents to be signed by its proper officer this day of , 20_ SIGNED: City of Shorewood, a Minnesota municipal corporation STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF The foregoing instmmentwas acknowledged before me this day of. 20J by of City of Shorewood, a Minnesota municipal corporation , on behalf of the corporation. Notary Public, County, Minnesota Notary Printed Name My Commission Expires I Kyle L. Klasen do hereby certify that this plat vase prepared by me or under my direct supervision; that 1 am a duty Licensed Land Surveyor in the State of Minnesota; that this plat is a correct representation of the boundary survey; that all mathematical data and labels are correctly designated on this plat; that all monuments depicted on this plat have been, or will be correctly set within one year; that all water boundaries and wet lands, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.01, Subd. 3, as of the date of this certificate are shown and labeled on this Plat; and all public ways are shown and labeled on this plat. Dated this day of , 20 Kyle L. Klasen, Licensed Land Surveyor, Minnesota License No. 44606 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF The foregoing Instrument was acknowledged before me this day of. 20, by Kyle L. Klasen, a Licensed Land Surveyor. Notary Public, County, Minnesota Notary Printed Name My Commission Expires DRAFT SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA This plat of WOODHAVEN 7TH ADDITION was approved and accepted by the City Council of Shorewood, Minnesota, at a regular meeting thereof held this_ day of ,20 .Ifapplicable, the written comments and recommendations of the Commissioner of Transportation and the County Highway Engineer have been received by the City or the prescribed 30 -day period has elapsed without receipt of such comments and recommendations, as provided by Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.03, Subdivision 2. City Council, Shorewood, Minnesota By: Mayor Clerk RESIDENT AND REAL ESTATE SERVICES, Hennepin County, Minnesota I hereby certify that taxes payable in 20_ and prior years have been paid for land described on this plat, dated this day of , 20 _. Mark V. Chapin, County Auditor Deputy SURVEY DIVISION, Hennepin County, Minnesota Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 3836.555 (1969), this plat has been approved this day of 20 Chris F. Mavis, County Surveyor By: REGISTRAR OF TITLES, Hennepin County, Minnesota I hereby certify that the within plat of WOODHAVEN 7TH ADDITION was filed in this office this day of 20_, at o'clock_.M. Martin McCormick, Registrar of Titles ' By: Deputy I� nRr�nNlnIA1\/ A r'\r-\ ITInNI / r VkJ \U\IJI NL/yy I r"lvvl I I\/IV FD 61AGNETIC DRAW DETECTION / UNDER BITUMINOUS DRNEWAY JUDICIAL RKPURSUANT TO TORRENS CASE NO. / — — — — — — — — _ N89 °32'23 "W 134.63 L— 10 ( N N I DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT � / re \RI �l J I •t nr l 4 I C; / I / I � I / 10T .1 LA/ I ' I LOT 1 L_Uvf, I BLOCK 1 tB ro 7 4V cc C /J / I-DRAINAGEBUTILRYEASEMENT�' v t 4122- R> 17 s C.BRG'N78 12 , 94 q s C-170.70 42 „w l 'D ST^rL -) Arras C)n �JI A /\r R I I I URD 1 LA E h / LOT I Li L0 K' I 0 I t J i f LL � n lJs Y 0 DENOTES 1/2 INCH X 14 INCH IRON MONUMENT SET AND MARKED BY LICENSE NO. 44606. DENOTES FOUND 112 INCH OPEN IRON PIPE, UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED. Q DENOTES FOUND HENNEPIN COUNTY CAST IRON MONUMENT, UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED. THE WEST LINE OF OUTLOT A, WOODHAVEN SECOND ADDITION, IS ASSUMED TO HAVE A BEARING OF S00 °27'37W. /�/ ///�-/ \�Q 29 Marie Darling From: Catherine DeCosse <decosse.cath @gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2018 10:52 AM To: Planning; City Hall Cc: ghkramermd @gmail.com; Hubs Subject: 22000 Stratford Place - Planning Commission Meeting - Comments Dear Marie Darling & Planning Commission, We would like to apologize in advance for our absence at the August 28, 2018 Planning Commission Meeting due to prior travel commitments. However, we wanted to submit concerns regarding the buildable lot consideration notice for the 22000 Stratford Place location. We live on Stratford Place and thought it would be beneficial for the Planning Commission to be aware of some lot conditions that would cause concern for future builds. The small portion of land located on Stratford Place would be insufficient for driveway access as there is a standing neighborhood garden median. In addition, the lot is located at the bottom of a significant incline on Apple Road and Stratford Place and is the primary location for all water runoff - the lot floods anytime it rains and during winter thaw. Finally, located on the lot is a large drainage creek that flows from the top of Apple Road and under Stratford Place road. A development may cause disruption to the drainage system on the lot. Thank you for the receptiveness to our input. Best Regards, Catherine & Justin DeCosse i Marie Darling From: George Kramer <ghkramermd @gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2018 12:38 PM To: Marie Darling Cc: decosse.cath @gmail.com; jrdecosse @gmail.com; Patti Helgesen Subject: Re: 22000 Stratford Place - Planning Commission Meeting - Comments Attachments: image001 jpg Hello Ms Darling and planning commission, I thought I would reply to all on this e mail to make sure all parties receive it. As a longtime resident of Stratford Place (24000 Stratford Place) and owner of the largest creek bed easement along Apple Road Creek I would like to express my concern also about the suitability of the proposed possible build on the lot at 22000 Stratford Pl. The lot is indeed quite small and floods quite often during heavy rains in the summer despite the partial improvement of the creek bed project that was completed a few years ago. There is a collection pool that was dug during that project, but this often overflows and sometimes actually goes over the street on into the lot in question, thus filling the lot with water from the culvert and overflow above the road.. I would suggest the city engineer or some other qualified person come to look at the lot size as well as drainage around it before proceeding with any new proposals. It really would be considered part of the wetland on the other side of the adjoining driveway to the North. In my opinion. I regret I will not be able to make the planning meeting either. Please take these concerns into consideration carefully, as I think it would be possibly a liability for the city if the city sold it as a billable lot. I suspect there would be a large water problem in any basement, and land drainage also. Sincerely, George Kramer MD On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 10:55 AM Marie Darling <MDarling@ci.shorewood.mn.us> wrote: Thank you for your comments. We'll attach them to the staff report for the Planning Commission and City Council. 9Xas[e Dasarq Planning Director !O Ir' O O a, 0 N � 01 � o M 3 AMA �o O 0 � 3 O O � o 3 N U ° N N O � w A z 0 w U O O U U O cd O ti O U bA a 0 U t�A a al Q P- 00 O N 00 N b�A M O O r C� Q U t N O 0 00 00 O N M N 0 2 z a A Q 0 N N M a� Q N O 0 I U d' 00 a w a PS N W p N O ^O O v� p :J r O � V � a O o 00 O N M N 0 2 z a A Q 0 N N M a� Q N O 0 I U d' 00 a w a PS N p N O ^O O v� p :J r O V O > �, m a) O _ ap 0 O O 'C3 _O a� 0 O O O 0 0 U O C3 �- U Q > C3 O �O z3 Page 2 BACKGROUND Context: The current home was constructed around 1910 and the property was created in 1985 with a minor subdivision. The property contains mature trees and is subject to tree preservation. The site has no property within a shoreland or floodplain overlay district. The right -of -way for Glencoe Road was acquired after the home was constructed and the home is located 24 feet from the front property line where 30 feet is required. The home would continue as non - conforming building after the subdivision is granted. ANALYSIS A. Minor Subdivision. The applicant proposes to subdivide the property into two parcels, one for the existing house and one for a new home. All improvements (sheds, paver walks, etc.) currently straddling the new property line would need to be removed. Lot Width/Area: Section 1202.05 Subd. 2. c. of the subdivision regulations requires that all lots have adequate frontage on a city approved street to accommodate a driveway and required driveway setbacks. Additionally, section 1201.13 of the zoning regulations has specific area and width requirements for newly created lots. The current and proposed lot areas and widths are shown below: *As measured at the front setback Easements: Section 1202.05 Subd. 6 requires 10 -foot drainage and utility easements around the periphery of each lot. As a condition of approval, staff recommends the applicant submit executed copies of drainage and utility easements prior to recording the subdivision with Hennepin County. Access /Lot Frontage: Section 1202.05 Subd. 2. C. requires that every lot have adequate frontage on a city approved street to accommodate a driveway and section 1201.03 Subd. 5 of the zoning regulations requires a 40 -foot driveway setback from the intersection of property lines at the corner and a five -foot setback from the north property line. The property is a corner lot and both lots would provide an adequate amount of lot width to construct a conforming driveway consistent with setbacks. Visibility at the corner is compromised by landscaping, staff recommend the plantings be trimmed back consistent with zoning ordinance requirements. Stormwater Run -Off. Staff reviewed the storm water calculations based on the additional impervious created by construction of a new home on the property and changes proposed on the northerly lot. The applicant has proposed an infiltration trench and the city's engineering staff review of the proposal is attached. Subject to the review comments, the applicant's proposal would be able to meet the city's requirements for rate control. Lot Area Lot Width* Lot Area Lot Width* Lot Area Lot Width* Existing Property 26,012 sf 154 feet NA 10,000 sf 75 feet Northerly Lot NA NA 13,127 sf 75 feet Southerly Lot 12,884 sf 79 feet *As measured at the front setback Easements: Section 1202.05 Subd. 6 requires 10 -foot drainage and utility easements around the periphery of each lot. As a condition of approval, staff recommends the applicant submit executed copies of drainage and utility easements prior to recording the subdivision with Hennepin County. Access /Lot Frontage: Section 1202.05 Subd. 2. C. requires that every lot have adequate frontage on a city approved street to accommodate a driveway and section 1201.03 Subd. 5 of the zoning regulations requires a 40 -foot driveway setback from the intersection of property lines at the corner and a five -foot setback from the north property line. The property is a corner lot and both lots would provide an adequate amount of lot width to construct a conforming driveway consistent with setbacks. Visibility at the corner is compromised by landscaping, staff recommend the plantings be trimmed back consistent with zoning ordinance requirements. Stormwater Run -Off. Staff reviewed the storm water calculations based on the additional impervious created by construction of a new home on the property and changes proposed on the northerly lot. The applicant has proposed an infiltration trench and the city's engineering staff review of the proposal is attached. Subject to the review comments, the applicant's proposal would be able to meet the city's requirements for rate control. M N cc P-4 0 4 U U U N cC3 3 0 C 'r � -OM s, U vi .0 U 41 O�"— _ O j N O bA N N U c� +�- nzi U U O bA _ N y 'o to r. cd 0 O tl V, N O �: N N �, 44 „�. Q, 4+ N U to boo cn •V "+-' 'vii. N +++ 0 O N •v� ~ �" 4Z cl O O O O N ' ^d O N 'd vUi N �cd U N T3 +U U cn CA O N O N E } U CS U U m 0 cd U U � l� a- �" + c -4- +, 3 'd O p cC U > O cd p -- U +� p i p s o N N > 0 O —M y Q 144 > U cd p 7, 0 O U O to 0 H t� ai O N 0 +U r/1 U &�i N cz Cd U to G" O '� C,: H h> P4 'E Page 4 granted for the porch or patio would make the variance for the cantilever invisible to anyone passing by. 3. Economic Considerations: The applicant hasn't proposed the additions exclusively to increase the value of the home, but to increase the livability. 4. and 5. Public Welfare /Injurious to Other Property. The property owners are not proposing anything that would impair an adequate supply of light and air to an adjacent property, increase the risk of fire or endanger public safety, unreasonably diminish or impair values in the neighborhood. 6. The applicant has stated that the requested variance is the minimum necessary to alleviate the practical difficulties. However staff notes that the 10 -foot by 13 -foot porch, a 19.5 -foot by 11.5 -foot patio and the cantilevered portion of the master suite could be reduced in size without making any of the areas unusable. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the minor subdivision based on the finding that the lots would be consistent with subdivision and zoning requirements with the following conditions: Prior to recording the subdivision, the applicant complete the following: a. Submit executed drainage and utility easements. b. Receive approval from the City of Excelsior to connect to their city water and sewer. c. Submit payment of fees for park dedication, water connection charges, and local sanitary sewer access charges. d. Remove all buildings and improvements that straddle the property line or are on the southerly lot. e. Revise the stormwater management plan as indicated by the City Engineer. Other conditions: a. Remove /trim vegetation on the corner of Academy Avenue and Glencoe Road. b. With the building permit application, the applicant shall submit a tree preservation/landscaping plan signed by a licensed forester, arborist or landscape architect. C. Prior to installing services or conducting other work in the right -of -way, obtain a right - of -way permit. d. Prior to construction of improvements on either lot, the applicant must acquire the appropriate permits. e. Remove the retaining wall that would encroach into the drainage and utility easement on the north side of the lot. Staff recommend approval of the variance application although noting that the applicant has met some of the conditions better than others and acknowledge that the Planning Commission could reasonably find the variance criteria are not met. aapaoq Ajunoo a9nae0/uasseyuey3 jo Ajio G) L L c� G T ^ _N a a o Grp`? I H CD CD o m a e� d fi idl E) It Jul Ape Oad joafgng fi aL a 0 J 000, 009 o9Z 0 N ID 0 0 s 0 s 0o Z C a) s V) aJ Q O Q L L co Q) U Q c C E E Q Q U C CTS C) s n O C) CO O uj o w 4 N N � O O N p 0 7 ss Q Q Q n - 4o 0 V CQ � Tn m 'a) N = aJ + . � " a +3 0 = >- L � LL S C - ' Q) Q E C Ln 4- Q 0> a) Q 4, rL o w Q� LQ 0 ° m 0 a s> U } tea a- +- i > C QO � 0 O Q N v " > i 0 J O 2- �U 4- U pp ++J ) aN o Co O v 0 � s L � O •-I 4 O Q Q U Q , Q C Q 4 4- Q N ) V� N U Q M O p ._ O 4=- - �' E- O I� Q) Q N do w ° a) 'a ro ^ j s Co C CO 0 N Q ON 00 Lo O 4-1 Q a) Q) -a N LO , Q 'p +� '+� co * 0 a) U s 4.1 O s 0+ L c6 s � C a) L n O a) O 3 U— Q 0 m} C = O ,n co -C v c +1 L O 4J SZ O 4- O a) C6 U + p I— L ° c 7— Z L r N �, Co O co 3 3 ° y= C oQC t o a) VI n eo v° a Q CL m Q C°C 0 Q "i3 a) Q) Q) 4-� s V) C Q CO N N .� -' Q t)o '� U C Q s L a) U to C Lp ca U CO C ^ O O ° Q a1 p > 0 co O Ln U c N n a) a) CCa n ° Qi } O U >O v N "L- N +� Ca a) U ro n SZ O 3 Q •x O C 3 Q n co L C6 i V Co N O Co E a 0 O n Q '� O O U Q -0 U h0 _ > 4-+ .1 tlo bA " vI L L �° Q Q U '�'- C Q = +� c U Q p O O U co en Q) > c v Q a) + Q> 3 0 E Q C (�6 bQ.o `� s v a) (�„) .� > > '� C�'a L Q) v) > o +J o L µ fo ~ U Co a-•' s O ° U +� Q Q � 0 a--+ CC — 3 a) a-- o U -Q C Q 3 o Q CTS 4-� 4' o U a) � Ca C Q s 3 V) s + i co 4� L O >` tlo 3 Q a) p �° a) LO Q > i_+ a ° p N O O p U co a) .1--+ N Q) U Q +� + O s° o > Q s L ? t p p s U C Q) o U �O _° 0 OL U Q m E Q 4- °� m C +-+ O 0) s .� i •tL-+ fo >' do a) C o � f° 0 s 4� o L •� Co .- Ll 'p '� O O +' Q v -6 ,_ 41 6 L ° a) ° C a1 C ° aC1 L m C6 0 O � 'V N 00 'x Q a) N aL••+ V) V) Q Q Q) Q) > 0 C p .� C .`n ? C N n p .� — aJ N +' Q_0 X E Q) Q Q) F--- 0 ,= .- .Q C � p ,' = � � L ° a> 3= a p ° c f° +� 3 m N (ns U Q s >— i tin •L 0 a �_ Q 4� Q c 4 -c +' ° L) 0 .Q s o L '`n c '� Q> s '~' — 3 X —° 4L-n 0 aJ C 7 CO v 4- U C +J C a) bA p -6 Q) Q) C O a) CC7 (o s C O C6 Y Ln aJ tw C Q) L p n co cUO o O p co O L U v Q a1 N cU6 Q -O Q p Q ¢ Q) +� i. '�-' 'p S1 a) Q +-+ � E L o V) C o O tlo ` t .�'.� 0 Q V) E U 4. o 0 Q. F- U +-� Q -Q Q) > = E p V) "o � Q +' •1-•+ Q Q C O 1 co — Q +_, C U cT) n CO +� o a'' Q Q ,� .0 `° L 0 U co (TS +J V) C Q U s +-+ a._, a_+ f6 v L .N 0 CD ° Q Q Q 0 L -° L >. C •� s M ° s i s Q eo aQ) Q 'Q c O Q a) s +-+ c CCS Q +� p C Q L C7 Y _0 Q S? co O I— — 3 Q + Q u C ("6 L °° p+ p s ro +� C O > U 7 -6 — a) O Q Co Q (II Ca a) C 3 `n U 4- U > ° N 3 41 O �o �° C) o Q Q ,N Q o c c L > o Q Y v> C Q Op '� '� E _ '-` '� C Q) u _ L17 'N .N CU �— +•! 0 4- S s Ln N � s -'� 4.1 Co c- � � U L c U Q Q n E O L o > 0 SZ m 0 0 E s s 3 y0_, n ca � 0 yQi s -p O N O 3 Go a) U Q�� > � L t)o s C O O v '- O C i i -O Q1 O Q Q + Q U - ° s — C Q) C s f6 Q- C U — +-+ CQ s L L 4-- N Ln VI N Q to C6 m > .Q o Q f 6 Q tlo Q t)o bo _O' C On .H+ C6 .)..+ S= 2 s o 0 .0 > > (o +J L -C 4- to N -0 C CTS U C v U C Co o Q Q a) O L Q Co 'a-� +-+ -0 U Q a) s L +� +� Q Q C L- ❑. = L U VI CO -0 -0 - 3 a) s N L +•+ s Co -� Q) L VI O C a a7 I'_ I- Co L p O> Q Q L N C C a) co c-I a) N n O aJ Q Q O 3 +L, m Q _0 *$ N .N +J O 3 L d V) +-+ ra Co Ca .Q s *$ oo *k Q) CZ c N L V) *k LCl 0 0 s 0 s 0o Z C a) s V) aJ Q O Q L L co Q) U Q c C E E Q Q U C CTS C) s lk -, -1990or- NORTH Ei - A2 yl ik . . . . ... . . 13 An - p A rh K. to JUL 16 2018 CITY OF SHOREWOOD LEGAL DESCRIPTION: 8. Note that all building dimensions and building tie dimensions to the property lines, are taken from Lots 6 and 7 and that part of Lot 5 which lies southerly of a line described as follows: Beginning at the the siding and or stucco of the building. southwest comer of said Lot 5; thence easterly to a point on the easterly line of said Lot 5, distant 7.00 feet northeast of the southeast corner of said Lot 5 and there terminating, all in BALL'S ADDITION TO STANDARD SYMBOLS & CONVENTIONS: EXCELSIOR, Hennepin County, Minnesota. " ®" Denotes iron survey marker, set, unless otherwise noted. PROPOSED LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF SOUTHERLY PARCEL: Lots 6 and 7 and that part of Lot 5 which lies southerly of a line described as follows: Beginning at the southwest corner of said Lot 5; thence easterly to a point on the easterly line of said Lot 5, distant 7.00 feet northeast of the southeast corner of said Lot 5 and there terminating, all in BALL'S ADDITION TO EXCELSIOR, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying South of the following described line: Commencing at the southwest corner of said Lot 7; thence northeasterly along the westerly lines of said Lots 6 and 7, a distance of 83.00 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence southeasterly to a point on the East line of said Lot 6 distant 60.25 northeast of the southeast comer of said Lot 7 and there terminating. Contains 12,885 Sq. Ft. or 0.3 Acres = "' ° . PROPOSED LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF NORTHERLY PARCEL: Lots 6 and 7 and that part of Lot 5 which lies southerly of a line described as follows: Beginning at the southwest corner of said Lot 5; thence easterly to a point on the easterly line of said Lot 5, distant 7.00 feet northeast of the southeast corner of said Lot 5 and there terminating, all in BALL'S ADDITION TO ' EXCELSIOR, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying North of the following described line: Commencing at the southwest comer of said Lot 7; thence northeasterly along the westerly lines of said ' Lots 6 and 7, a distance of 83.00 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence southeasterly to a point on the East line of said Lot 6 distant 60.25 northeast of the southeast corner of said Lot 7 and there terminating. rR2 Contains 13,127 Sq. Ft. or 0.3 Acres ' Exisfir7 SCOPE OF WORK & LIMITATIONS: �He / /ing 1. Showing the length and direction of boundary lines of the legal description listed above. The scope X9= of our services does not include determining what you own, which is a legal matter. Please check X' ns 9i�,e a s '2 emu' Nl the legal description with your records or consult with competent legal counsel, if necessary, to p -- ` H' make sure that it is correct and that any matters of record, such as easements, that you wish to be - - -16°_ 9_ X9723 cLS 9)39 - -- A aiya included on the survey have been shown. '9 14 ° ✓�� 914 2. Showing the location of observed existing improvements we deem necessary for the survey. _ , i X 9527 �aLO9 Flpe, 7 x 9513 \\ X9523 It \\ �\ 1 X 9553 \ \ X 9sIA � rae°68-0 9da6 \ 79 9699 1.4 \y 9659 x 9515 X95 {3 \ \ X9527 \ \ \ X o x 9s _ \ \ \��\ °g1 _ \�_- - X839. ,031. � \ `• ````` •� q 417 -� -- `X96°0 \ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\\ X9ssi' X 964E( g X 9635 X 9 ' l % x9659 X 9659 X 9657 9661 X %6s � e %) ).{96]5 96).{96]5 X �aLO9 Flpe, 7 %7.4x167. 1 %] V 967 .7 Iles I 'b %].] \ � � rae°68-0 9da6 \ 79 9699 1.4 \y 9659 3. Setting survey markers or verifying existing survey markers to establish the comers of the property. ( / /-- ; gr x ;: ; a ` -.`a/* -1 do- 4. Showing nd tabulating impervious surface coverage of the lot for your review and for the review f )` 4' � wT ' a� 01U11!1C'— / , ]42 , \ / 969 & • 6A0 g g P g your �BL6^ / i 9 >94 of such governmental agencies that may have jurisd iction over these requirements to verify they are M 9160 9) 7 �(1n9 i x 9,0 9695 correctly shown before proceeding with construction. I —9, 15 g e 91 I 9693 A 5. Showing elevations on the site at selected locations to give some indication of the topography of O 2`6 / 1 I 976e n� / 9768 ) )7.7.' .r. ••9jl♦ 9]95 X973, %9.7 the site. We have also provided a benchmark for your Use in determining elevations for / x , - / f 976] 96 , 9 3 M 0 9)&6 construction on this site. The elevations shown relate only to the benchmark provided on this / / K /1 ; i 2x9 s 9TL9 survey. Use that benchmark and check at least one other feature shown on the survey when / / „ a a c 3 97a6 0991 �(9]93�'° / I 9693 determining ther elevations for use on this site or before be imTin construction. / / % x9756 \ \ 1 9J y , y a 0 9)99 g g g x 972E ]2 \ tY t4 0 v 6. We show a proposed division of the property. Please review the proposal to see that it is what you 1 `� 9'6 977.9 w o W p 9 9]25 ``)(9 89 Ld° z9] r/ / (x9]L7 g intend and submit to those governmental agencies that have jurisdiction to obtain their approvals, if I i ; W \w,b z* m< o s7a r ' / � I\Ibrph1 /ilarce�l / you can, before making any decisions regarding the property. x 9 3e ( I o a f_� \ 1 '�' / ' Zz 9, / / ©/9 ^' �o' t '' /' x "a2 7. This survey has been completed without the benefit of a current title commitment. There may be 1 97 j \,oi \ �\ 9,� %n ¢ ( / d '' x existing easements or other encumbrances that would be revealed by a current title commitment. x9731 11' J 9] 9)4s x9],.] ^ I 1 , Therefore, this survey does not purport to show any easements or encumbrances other than the ones O 2�1 1 mss 1 D — _ — >ao�i shown hereon. $ ' I 918E J i — 1 "� 1 / Pl P-rpng /< / 9793 M 9)62 \ e7os Q% Q / / X9)6a 90 / l ( / / % e/ghb fa _ 97n4x 97n4 LEGEND rV` ; / 9)93 I i / / / — — ` 97°] - CATCH BASIN o " I / / / / / / `,q )a9 y Q /vb I / I 9193' Q X9)64 / X �]1 FIRE HYDRANT 4�j/ �'' p / X > / 9 9. ( I �� / / / _ 91 97M POWER POLE 9 ® = MANHOLE 33 i x1n6d \\\ Xg>� 9// t / / I �xn3/ # /,/// ! �� i -a X 9] u / \ , / / X 9)951 9)9b / i 1 - r 971E ® = TELEPHONE PFD. r J9 `✓ l I \ Southerly /PaVicel °'�— "2 8 = ELEC. TRANSFORMER i C l / \ I WELL ; X 97 9 Q r ^ L- r� !! X "'A 1 \ X 9)S� 9]23 ® GATE VALVE 111\ \\ ` \\r•`j97es \\ x9i9e ° LIGHT POLE X9j %9 9),3 \7 a' I / 76E �\ \\ \ ©A / / 9 -TREE � _ �1 —X —X— °FENCE LINE - ' ` s� \ / NjfY 5253X9)6] , \ \s \ fLB4' b9>4 9]43— — _S — ° SANITARY SEWER LINE EXISTING HARDCOVER ' °e \\ \ 977.9 r <° House 801 Sq. Ft. cL ` -\ W— = WATER LINE Gravel Driveway 2,387 Sq. Ft. , i3 \ \ \ _' X Q -`e Garage 295 Sq. Ft. 9)y `\ \ �X9�71!! -�, -Edge tfAH °Od /1 ��,�976.4 —G— = GAS LINE Concrete Surfaces 150 sq. Ft. \ X965 9765 ']6) t '] '766 762 — ST— = STORM DRAIN LINE Shetl 273 Sq. Ft. \ Brick 1Yalka 574 Sq, Ft. v —E— - OVERHEAD UTILITY LINE De ER ck 252 Sq. Ft. N a ighbor'a Gravel Dr. 115 8q. Ft. ,[ X9)69 X9]6] 9760 X 9,6E X 9769 X9769 @4164 TOTAL EXISTING HARDCOVER 4,777 Sq. Ft. - CONCRETE SURFACE AREA OF LOT 26,012 Sq. Ft. ) .- Benchmark.• — Academy Avenue PERCENTAGE OF HARDCOVER TO LOT 18.4% 7ep of manhola -97.12 X 9)]9 DATE REVISION DESCRIPTION DRAWING ORIENTATION 6 SCALE CLIENT NAME I JOB ADDRESS I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SURVEY OR REPORT 7/18/18 SHOW LOT SPLIT Advan WAS PREPARED BY IIE OR UNDER NY DRECT SUPERW904 GWEN CHYNOWETH & BILL MEYER ce UNDER R TH AM A DULY REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR 7/24/18 SHOW ADDITIONAL TOPO UNDER 1H LAWS Or E OF L9NNESOTA SUNey %/7g & Engineering, CO. DATE SURVEYED: MAY 10, 2018 N 5865 GLENCOE ROAD Thomas M. Bloom i7 17917 Highway 7 # 42379 DATE DRAFTED: MAY 11, 2018 SCALE 1" = 20' SHOR ti'Y`7OOD MN Minnetonka, Minnesota 55345 2D 4D 1 LICENSE NO. Phone (952) 474 -7964 MAY 11, 2018 Web: vnvw.advsucconn DATE SHEETTITLE SHEET SIZE 22 X 34 EXISTING CONDITIONS SHEET No. SURVEY ^ DRAWING NUMBER 180350 TB REV 7 - 24 SHEET 1 OF 1 Die / /ir�� 1 X 970,5 X 97016 X 970,4 ��s X 9713 I 12,1 ^ ' 72,2 F 0,9 �L6 72, 2, d /�� 973,0 72,3 - - - /V 977x45,0 9 [i t s --1,79.9,9 � � - X -9aO- 3 747 , _ 978, ^g8a6883/ / / ' X 974,2 ' - - X 971.9 l / , '9 � �/ 9717 i i _ / g8 1 x1979, / l %� 976,0 16 97 ,8 _ � 977,0 / 9 J _ -- x85/ ' ; 7 X 73 -977.5 / 24, /� / � C .0 O Eu6 / ' ' I X977,2 �97a,o �O1K'�l 24�,(. ?¢, �� / } 70.0 976.X 97,8 1 0 977,7. ?9,1 K 979. 979, x X 973,4 VV ' �(J ) � �' a XV6.b 976,9 5 ^ y q1 r V Xg7f / �� V, 1 4/. y; 978,6 /i 9,1 / 9,2 % 8,8 I ; X 74,2X 9 4.5 / 972.9 ^ (CS 97 X i 978, a pfi 978,6 ♦ \ _ 979,3 / I(' ` 978,0 a�� l / X 975,6 \ ,0 X 972,6 /972. �q,'d i X7612 1_7 t, � \ \ ` 977.9 j O 978,5 X 978,8 v X 97 .8 / / /� / / / / X 971.7 / i ' RE l/ISED LOT1 I \977,6 22 ¢ Qj� 0 �X _ X 973,8 ` 978,7'\ X 978,8 / / �; /101, �/� n x GARAGE - 576 l w \ ,� x 978 .' }53,2 f 1 PORCH - NA 1x97a�\ Z 97s,a 97d,b� / r 1 , 1 PATIO - 227 t _ X / (/ / b 1 FRONT STOOP - 22 \ X 973.1 973, X 974.5 4,7 97 ,2 ^ \ ' 16Q 74.3 I / / , SIDEWALK - 250 O 975,5 ' X 978,4 \ X / // I / I / DRIVEWAY - 1222 1 / 970,2 '� TOTAL HARD COVER - 3098 / 8,6 ( X 97718 975,3 I i . 1 '` - 23, 6% H. C. o / (;'rave/ parking = LOT - 131274 ,8 X 3 097 ,5 rE0 970,2 \ X .35 �j , eighbo to ------ , �y X 970,4 H. C. Allowed 4594.6 1 / -dock he e st. Qj O u ��,/ ' 9 �97'n9 / ' / Q1 X 970.4 \ X/970,8 979.5 97 Jd'6 18" �' 9 _ ' i ( / / // _ - LOT & /� ' HOUSE - 167 X 97 X 3,5 � X 976.0 � � GARAGE - 676 6 X 97� 5 � _ 72, ( N -1 PORCH - 212 Setback - ' V PA TO - 244 r p 000 �` FRONT STOOP - 53 \\ '� ;X70.7 1 ^ SIDEWALK - 253 1 ; X9 .9 10 _ 20' Setback _ l _ _ �1 /"X 972,3 1 DRIVEWAY - 611 976,5 12 ' / %- +- - \ TOTAL HARD COVER - 3857 X 979,4 1 - 29.9% H. C. \97es t X�i9,z // /� \ \\ 7 9R3.z_ LOT - 12884 979, fI 1 \ / 35 \ \ \ \ \ 6/ 0� X74,1 \ / 973,6x / H.C. Allowed 4509.4 X 9 3,9 974,3 \ 6 i 976.6 \ \ \ 97,0- J Fou d Iron - \ �, - O� - -1 .50„ �6�72�i 977.0 N 9 52 53 X 976,7 �<s TREES TO BE REMOVED 977,9 �s. J� ,�C 975.2 - - -`�� 1 - 8" Tree c� \ \ _� �s • <e ?�` �i� �✓ i 1- 16" Tree \ X 977,2 /J i� 975,3 \ X 977 _, =Edge o oad \ ` -976 976.4 X 976,5 976, 976,7 ' 976.7 976,6 76,2 976.0 i i 7 , 976,0 X 9766 X 976.8 X 976.9 X 976,8 X 976. RECEIVED ' I ®976,4 i Benchmark: - - _ Academy Avenue( ' Top of manhole-975.2 " r ; � 1�3 rJ J ®.9-75,2 X 977,0 (T) FRONT ELEVATION SCALE, 1/4' • V-V .............................................. iTWftmW�k ........................... ELEV. 91900 ROOF LOUVERS FIXF LOUVERS u L3 0 0 0 u Q 0 u 0 0 0 u u —�L— —bLU4 22 V21 x 10 In, WWTER rc i i i 5. WTER FLAT RooF FLAT IRVCF i 5' GUTTER 5MARE ________tip El El ................................ ..................................................... ---------------- RECEIVED EP ? 2 01 8 U y W3S20J1 ,90. ....................... ................ MAN.LEA.L.$MB .................... TG; W Fi�P1 WALL ELEV.tl'W i i i i a r ELEV. 91520 .................. ......................................................................................... -'E ............................. ELEV. 110W ELEV. S -- — — — — — ------ RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION NOTES: • PLATE HE;GWT TO W V W TrFiCAL (UESS NOTED ONEFUSE). • Tn'rAL WOW WEAPERS TO BE 2-2M5 UNLESS NOTED OTWJ;WW- TOCAL � OFENM 10 DE 6'-H 3B' OF RMH FLOOR DMOM ARE TO CENTER OF NTEPJOR WALLS / FACE OF EXTERIOR WALLS • SEE PAW E•1 FOR UPPER LEVEL ELECTRICAL P A`t FR7✓M SPACE TO ACCal=ATE 5 V4' EASE 13 LWCASW. • '350 BML'DMLN05E CORER BM • ALL OSMPE CoReRB. FOE u 0 9 x W W 0 Nvtii �j 21- �P-H` SHEET INDEX ARCHUCTUR AL ThU-11S., A- F—L—f fin A-3 firjFk�, Pl, A4 A-5 Ev,,*,a�SJ:ffl--,— F ,V BZL!C -tits A4 BP-E-gS:.ti,,, A-9 I- I R, W 1-3 14 '—EL—b-1 E-1 E;,.kdfh� E-2 Fk� IFLa S-1 . �FOeTW.—'—'—' .... --'.... --'— �__---------_ ----------------------_—___--_-----� (1)5ACK ELEVATION Welgi --'-------'— SHEET INDEX AA F�Jfl-fl, 14 II-El-m- E A .ti N v a� V k� a c Le�SkkL� 0 / qr ♦ � STAIR 60'X6 ®' 2 i I FI ek DLI. d4 tmw - 44 44 m ELER GEYI ---- - - - - -1 �i\ I� 7X6 7.6 -. FKL TO.E �. I :'k- ArSY 2 LNNDRT u{ K1 W CLN 2-4X6-8 PAW RROR °S� d < : I I b'- IVa'aG - - - - -- - -- - - - -- � 36' TOP 19'- IVa'aG � MASTER CLOSET I 4,_4, ,_� � ` ♦. �u�er� a I m -- - - - -- 6V 2 ru�D ; 1 cgs€ a - - - -- - - - ay - - - - -- - - -., ----------- R 44'QEAR j 1 I Wd IR'GEILM a5 n x 25 I � 5 `- ---- ELECT. N FLOOR FEAT IL ®FD. anRAL ._ - q -------- g4aaa3 S z u 0 11 J i Sd7 a - -a 7 -4X6-8 - - - - - -- - -- - -- - - LM s I - -- a GARAGE ° oN nR I 7 -4X6 -a I a� - 4 - - - - - - - - - - I� x 1 6x6 8 y �gu IVM6� I �d 1 � vala_r MAS sulTE C_ C_ I 7 -axe -m IFOYER s o 0 I 0 I m x o I 7x6 IOI 1 °I L J L 3 -mom -0 •SD. w o� � H -. - - - -- -- -- w w ow ' z c a v • w o - - -- - - -- DE :cr s PATIO ` -- -- - - - - -� I - d' 70' -m• x -:' r€ carcTE w IU < �m z a o� w >m w V -6' �Q�Qj �Q�Qjj 76' -0' b' -0' 38'.6' 3 3 m n���� MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN a�a�o `A 6CN-E, 114'- I'-0' m SHEET]NDES ARCIIITECTTT, AL TIM! 4l - A1s I 2 F C iLtv IF iYn A 3 F.t F3.rPl \J E (F lFh t:a I AeB2SlnI_ Pp i A1B : SFaa lu 14 Iea:. =Elea: E -1 Lln -k'Afh 5-1 )LhFk. Fcs�r Ptu A -3 SHEET N0. C5 cu a.. 4'V 9 :9 MIN PC ---- ---- ----- ----- --- ---- ----- ---- AP. DEDROOM 02 HO 1; 4� IL LMN X --- ---------- LIP 11R 'v ---------- —21H I —i ---------- ---------- LNEXCA�Mc) 6TORAG� MPROOM 03 W-9 L12' CIA M x 7: SQ is BEARM F"M LOWER LEVEL FINIeH FLOOR PLAN luuv $CALE: V4' 1'-0' V. 9 13 ................. SHEETINTDEX ARCI]PTCn,-P �l T�;A. A-2 A-3 fulFL,Ph A4 Eli-�ff-C%— A-5 A-6 A4 B:n'�-gSrfi A-S A�9 B'2k 1 l"6— 1.2 k, F�, �/ED E-1 11 �JPL� E-2 Lhl�-d M� "J 5 to i ti, S-1 �U'a%�r--gpL' D f X 9705 36u.q „/ 970.6 �, X 971,9 970.4 6\ ,� (\ I / Jw1 _2 21 ^f �I � I I 'a> 9 973.Q �f 68.7 \- 968.4 _ ,- SILT FENCE, ', X 973.12.74.1 -- - - _ _ - TYP. Low floor - 91 - 972.9 nos °^� - - - - - - - �''_ �', 96E,.9 walk Out door r 965.o 969,1 '9 SCo '4,7� '�gb� X 97:9 / --_ °tOPOSED - _ / _ l I`971�7 X` 476.0 97c 8 - - - -- �RIVVEDWAY .� �7m 579.2 / l �X f 7.� 970A 1 969,x o r 1 976 977.5 X F\-DEMOLISH v ' 976.8 X 577.2 ,� �G co 4� I EXISTING ' I I 976.0 °77.0 977,7 j 29 ]• -9 .GK % 979.: FFE:980 97e j� GARAGE '�X g73.�i / / •� Q) l I s� J/ a 969.9 a, = i or X 976.7 976.9] -775 % i � 978.6 �. a I �X 9. 4S - I , 574.E �X 972.9 978.0 978.5 �� 791 % j j ci ?69.5 ( X / \ 978.11 j X 975.6 X 9 7115 ('972,7 9' 1 J/` 0, '0 �) ' \ - - f / 7 y,74,3 + { X 970.0 f X 976.2 Q1 Q : 978.5 X 978.8 - 977. �' /� �;'� • � PROPOSED / �- , X 971,7 V f I t .�i7 `ti GARAGE BIOROLL 577.6', ! SEDIMENT 2' 978. / / 1. ROCK \ '�'- - .':978.8 l % / /0 r i CONTROL CONSTRUCTION `� ,��� / �� � j X 9f9:7 X 970.2 ENTRANCE - �� r / X 97,3,5 97a:!�\ / Al? / � �'y7 �r f, `/ i, 9C'9.9 _ v X o..� 970,14 X / fi 973.1 �� ('74.8 r `� �I 97 / 975�� f /c- "�78.4 ` REMOVE 16� . _ l r 470.2 3 FT RET. WALL / � / TREE � �, �' ! / /` V11 / 977. 7 / x.3 JVED i^ ' / ` 978.6 j 975.20 ' � = / 't/ u vcl �ar/Z / a o _ -_ i �s7sq E _ X974.5 C i en t w �', � 970.E 97 51,. - =� s7a.B5 s'a.B r' �� a �/ X I /s.0, �- s7 rper hbcll to 1. £ m j �G i 97850 ' jb j r--g 9704",,,r�7.4 / PROTECT h EXISTING TREE , O / I -1 }976 0 i r r `r0,' rn m� 95.s s / X 97c_e/ / U �Jt I i ' /Qu ( -C �976,� 978.04 1 \ 1 I \ \ 976,6 I ( Of ,' G6 r 975.3 X 976.5 `. 976,0 / � Irn / � -: I j j ��� - 75. � � - -- -,� =e tl7P -L-� -ye=t. L '� � t I __ 7k c -a 7 r k4 GFE =979.0 i ❑ d / YlJ / / s72 50 /� I v 970.8 Z3 - S 978.34 FFE =980.8 t � 97 �� i / ,'X�3. / � � � � X 970.4 ,l PE =970.0 j / / 970L K- f 978.42 -- - 1 REMOVE 8" s Ft W' 9712 ,� 1 ( - u / TREE I I X 9 i 3. I / rl / _ V I / I f ' I 975.50 / I o ' 4 j79.6 972.50 ti I 17 I; v _ 971,6 7 30' Setback L I \h IMPERVIOUS AREA SUMMARY PROTECT '' ExlsnNC I X �70 7 / LOT 1 AREA L l 20' Se tb cc 978'50 jI UTILITY POLE 13,127 SF 978 ) i 72.3 j LOT 1 HARDCOVER 3,098 SF X ,- 79.4 978.43 -r , / F \ ? 62LF 4" PERF. DT. W/ SOCK, 4'x4' ,(' LOT 1 HARDCOVER % - - LOT 2 AREA j 23.6°/0, 12,884 X /J79 'E - 977'---/ ( \ 40% VOID ROCK, INV =969.0 9 L_ LOT 2 HARDCOVER �- SILT FENCE, 1% / - 976 • / / I 3 FT RET. WALL r1 •� s> \ 7..'2 - TOP ROCK =972.0 BOT. ROCK =968.0 _ LOT 2 HARDCOVER % 3,745 29,9% `TIP. S J977.�• / I ' ,y?- 1 '' / 973,6 X EXISTING HARDCOVER: 4,737 SF j7 PROPOSED HARDCOVER: 3,098 +3,857 71Lt =6,955 SF _ NET INCREASE: 2,218 SF ` � 7 =,7 (� 3977,0 , / / X 576.7 \ �� �. �" I ° / EX. 100YR RUNOFF: 11,456 CF ` X 975,2 PROP. 100YR RUNOFF: 11,848 CIF 18" - � 977,9 � - ` c; 1 NET INCREASE 100YR RUNOFF: 392 CF -- - 1 „ 7,7 7.2 _ - 9 _- STORAGE PROVIDED: (62 *4 *4 *0.4) -� N 396 CF X 977,5 -Edge of.-B t -Food j - %`� - -' 976 / 976.7 % 976 J 97T,-,! 976.6 _ 976,4 - j_i= 40% VOID SPACE Academy _ Avenue L 0 05 10 20 DRAINTILE SECTION DETAIL SCALE IN FEET Amilk ALLIAN'T' e Na INEE.IN. 733 Marquette Avenue Suite 700 Minneapolis, MN 55402 612.758.3080 www.alliant- inc.com Z J a J 0 I-- Z 0 U Z 0 0 IY W a CL pC U) W O Q J Q) 0 0, Z o 0 Q Lr) Q o � c� I hereby ceriffy fhuf fhis plan, apeaiflcallon, or report wan prepared by me or under my dlrect up.,ielon and that I am a duly U ... e.d Professional Engineer under the lawe of the State of MINNESOTA 7-25-18 54821 54821 Date Ucen.. No. QUALITY ASSURANCE /CONTROL DAVE NASH. PE 7 -25 -18 BY DATE DATE ISSUE 7 -25 -18 CITY SUBVIITAL PROJECT TEAM DATA DESIGNED: D. SJOBLOM DRAWN: D. SJOBLOM PROJECT NO: 180128 C -1 SHEET 1 OF 2 SAWCUT' REMOVE AND REPLACE DISTURBED ROAD SECTION AS REQUIRED WET TAP WITH 1" CORP. EXISTING WATERMAIN, OWNED BY CITY OF EXCELSIOR, FIELD VERIFY LOCATION 1'n I r F ' k o ILI %I 1 i %1 I( 83 LF 1" TYPE K / COPPER WATER SERVICE (., CITY SHUT —OFF C / VALVE 73 LF 4" SCHEDULE 40 PVC SAN SERVICE ® 2.0% `CONNECT TO EX. 9" PVC SAN. SEWER WITH WYE AND RISER EX. INV= 957.45 (PER ASBUILT) EX. INV- 957.85 (PER ASBUILT ADJUSTED TO BENCHMARK) RISER INV =963.5 ( C� _N lye 06" -oy, ' ?o' v 1 7 6 \ �9j SAN STUB INV =965 GFE =979,0 I] ( 1 _-L- _ EX. 9" PVC SAN 9 2.4% SHOWN PER AS —BUILT 0" 0 t l` I zi � - � e 1 FFE =980.8 —4 ' LFE =970.0 i WSB 701 Xenia Avenue South I Suite 300 1 Minneapolis, MN 55416 1 (763) 541 -4800 Memorandum To: Alyson Fauske From: Laura Rescorla Date: August 22, 2098 Re: 5865 Glencoe Road City of Shorewood, MN WSB Project No. 092597 -000 The following documents were submitted for review of compliance with the City of Shorewood's Local Surface Water Management Plan: - Grading, Stormwater, and Erosion Control Plan, July 23, 2018 Revised August 21, 2018 - Soil Boring Report, July 23, 2018 - Stormwater Memo, July 25, 2018 Revised August 21, 2018 This review only included the documents listed above, primarily dealing with grading, modeling and the stormwater narrative. 1. The City of Shorewood requires calculations for the 1 -, 10 -, and 100 -year events. HydroCAD results were provided for these events; update the existing and proposed conditions tables to reflect the runoff for the 1 -year event. Applicant updated memo. 2. The drainage areas should include all proposed improvements on the site. Extend XW and PW to Glencoe Road to include all of the proposed driveway. Revise drainage area PE to delineate which area goes to the stormwater storage area and which goes directly off -site. Note that these updates may change the proposed discharge rates off -site. Applicant updated HydroCAD modeling. Include revised drainage area maps. 3. Include existing and proposed discharge rates off -site by discharge point, (i.e. east and west). Proposed rates should not exceed existing rates by discharge point. Applicant updated modeling and memo. 4. The runoff for the 10 -year event in the proposed conditions table does not match the HydroCAD modeling. While runoff increases for this event, it is only by 0.05 cfs. This is considered a . negligible increase. Note: This will likely change based on Comment 2. Applicant updated proposed conditions table. The discharge rate$ oftsite to the wed increase in all storm events, from 0.07 to 0.09 cfs. Ultimately, the east and west discharge points outlet to the same basin. In the 10- and 100 -year events the total discharge offsite is decreased in proposed conditions. In the 1 -year event, total discharge is increased by 0.04 cfs. However, this is considered a negligible increase and acceptable. 5. Verify that the roof configuration and gutters on the proposed structure will direct water as shown on the proposed conditions plan. Based on current modeling, 2119 sf of impervious surface is routed to the stormwater storage area, compared to 2218 sf of net new impervious. Because less than 100 sf of net new impervious surface is not routed to the stormwater storage area, the treatment is considered sufficient. Note: This will likely change based on Comment 2. Building a legacy. Equal Opportunity Employer I wsbeng.com K: \012597-000 \WR \5865 Glencoe\Aug22 Review \20180822_5865 Glencoe Drainage Review Memo.doa 5865 Glencoe Road Review August 22, 2018 Page 2 While only 1785 sf of impervious surface is routed to the stormwater storage area (213) based on the updated modeling, the required volume of storage is provided. This will be considered sufficient. 6. Verify the design details of the stormwater storage area. Consider including a detail for this feature. a. Is there going to be draintile at the 968 elevation? If so, add this to the model. Where will the draintile outlet; is any erosion protection needed? Draintile was added to plans. How will draintile outlet? The draintile elevation is 967.1, but is shown daylighting at approximately 971.0. Model the infiltration rate through the rock media (max of 1.63 in /hr per Minnesota Stormwater Manual), routed to the 4" draintile. Note that this may affect the HWL of the stormwater storage area. b. The rock section needs to drawdown in 48 hours to allow for storage in a subsequent storm event. Without draintile, assuming an infiltration rate of 0.06 in /hr, the rock section can only be 3 inches deep. Draintile has been added. Assuming an infiltration rate of 1.63 in /hr (HSG A per Minnesota Stormwater Manual), the 4 ft rock trench will drawdown in less than 48 hours. 7. Freeboard requirements from the 100 -year high water level (HWL) of the stormwater storage area are as follows. In addition to the structures on the subdivided lots, freeboard should also be met at the existing dwelling to the east of the property. a. 1 foot to the low floor elevation. If it can be demonstrated that this standard creates a hardship, the following will be acceptable. L The basement floor will be one foot above the highest anticipated groundwater elevations that can result from high surface water elevations elevation groundwater elevations during the 100 -year event. Applicant indicated that above requirement is met. b. 3 feet to the low opening elevation. However, if 3 feet is a hardship, 2 feet will be acceptable if the following conditions are met: i. That, within the 2 -foot freeboard area, stormwater storage is available which is equal to or exceeds 50% of the stormwater storage currently available in the basin below the 100 -year elevation. ii. That a 25% obstruction of the basin outlet over a 24 -hour period would not result in more than 1 foot of additional bounce in the basin. iii. An adequate overflow route from the basin is available that will provide assurance that one foot of freeboard will be maintained for the proposed low building opening. Demonstrate that the preceding conditions have been met at the stormwater storage area (21P). 8. There are several typos in the report: a. This property is in Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. b. The 1 -year precipitation amount is 2.50" not 2.87 ". c. The storm events are MSE 3, 24 -hour. Applicant updated memo. R: \012597-000 \WR \5865 Glencoe\Aug 22 Revlew \20180822_5865 Glencoe Drainage Review Memo. dm O M�I U C) 0 0 Cd rl- N ? • C r 3 AMA �N O Y 'ts tea+ O d o �+ b o T1�� • U V1 • U ° N w A z O W O U U O 0 O U by a O U bA a Q 1 �_ C) N 00 N _o I O Cd Cd lci Un Q U N w 00 d- 0 Q N v O 7, Q N+, O N N U CC M i N Q 'C7 N O 0 z a W U t i I � oc z a W Fes' a •� o a� � O O a o o U °a W a� H A H W z z U O 0 Q N v O 7, Q N+, O N N U CC M i N Q 'C7 N O 0 z a W U t i I � oc z a W Fes' a •� o a� � O O a o o U °a W a� � H a Cd O OD d ' O x - � O 'd H o O 7p:j- U O � "a 3 O O O G� N U i Cd Cd a a r-+ k 'C aj N 0O '� U zs a� 0 �1 N N �i K•j U U O a� U rH m ti cd c� O W O �o 0 0 �o H �, Page 2 ANALYSIS Lot Width/Area: Section 1202.05 Subd. 2. c. of the subdivision regulations requires that all lots have adequate frontage on a city approved street to accommodate a driveway and required driveway setbacks. Additionally, section 1201.13 of the zoning regulations has specific area and width requirements for newly created lots. The current and proposed lot areas and widths are shown below: cy �. -,rt —� Ts� � £ 5 �-� -��.� T C$_# — "�• t Yk � �Yi'§ �{ i. h,t 1 b�° �- �` Lot Area Lot Width* Lot Area Lot Width* Lot Area Lot Width* Existing Property 44,944 sf 260 feet NA 10,000 sf 75 feet Northerly Lot NA NA 22,171 sf 105 feet Southerly Lot 20,773 sf 155 feet *As measured at the front setback Easements: Section 1202.05 Subd. 6 requires 10 -foot drainage and utility easements around the periphery of each lot. As a condition of approval, staff recommends the applicant submit executed copies of drainage and utility easements prior to recording the subdivision with Hennepin County. Access /Lot Frontage: Section 1202.05 Subd. 2. C. requires that every lot have adequate frontage on a city approved street to accommodate a driveway and section 1201.03 Subd. 5 of the zoning regulations requires a 40 -foot driveway setback from the intersection of property lines at the corner and a five -foot setback from the side and rear property lines. The property is a corner lot and both lots would provide an adequate amount of lot width to construct a conforming driveway consistent with setbacks. Visibility at the corner is compromised by landscaping, staff recommend the plantings be trimmed back consistent with zoning ordinance requirements. Shoreland Overlay Requirements: Because the property is within the shoreland overlay district for Lake William and the northerly property would directly abut the lake, the following requirements would also apply: Setback to the OHWL: 50 feet. Maximum Impervious Surface Coverage: 25 feet Lot Width at lakeshore setback: 75 feet required about 79 feet proposed. (northerly lot only) Side yard setbacks: 30 feet combined (northerly lot only) Staff notes that the plans show an approximate location for the OHWL and consequently recommends the applicant revise the plans to shown the correct location. Whether the OHWL is at the approximate located noted or the 930 topography line, the applicant would meet the required setback. Staff further notes that the concept house on the northerly lot does not meet the required combined side -yard setbacks. Staff included a condition that the plans submitted for building permit meet the requirements of City Code. Wetland: The shoreland of Lake William is also wetland. The applicant is required to provide 35 feet of adjacent land into a wetland buffer and protect both the wetland and wetland buffer with conservation easements. All structures must be setback 15 feet from the wetland buffer. Staff Page 3 recommends the applicant revise the plans to show the delineated edge of the wetland and the wetland buffer on the plans. Stormwater Run -Off. Staff reviewed the storm water calculations based on the additional impervious created by the construction of new homes on the property. The applicant has proposed a rain garden for each of the new parcels. The city's engineering staff review of the proposal is attached. Subject to the review comments, the applicant's proposal would be able to meet the city's requirements for rate control. Utilities: The lots have access to municipal sewer. A right -of -way permit issued by the City of Shorewood would be required to install services. Water must be provided by private wells. Tree Preservation: The applicant has identified several significant trees that would be removed to accommodate the improvements. Based on the size of the trees removed and the size of the property, eight new trees would need to be planted on the lots. There is adequate room for the additional trees on the two lots and the applicant has shown climate - tolerant species. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the minor subdivision based on the finding that the lots would be consistent with subdivision and zoning requirements with the following conditions: Prior to recording the subdivision, the applicant complete the following: a. Submit executed drainage and utility easements and a conservation easement over the wetland and wetland buffer. b. Submit fees for park dedication and local sanitary sewer access charges. c. Remove all buildings and accessory structures. d. Revise the stormwater management plan as indicated by the City Engineer. e. Revise the plans to correctly indicate the ordinary high water level (930), the wetland and the wetland buffer on the plans and correct the setback to the OHWL as may be needed. Other conditions: a. Remove /trim vegetation on the corner of Femeroft Drive and Ivy Lane. b. With each building permit application, the applicant shall submit a tree preservation/landscaping plan signed by a licensed forester, arborist or landscape architect. C. Prior to installing services or conducting other work in the right -of -way, obtain a right - of -way permit. d. Prior to construction of improvements on either lot, the applicant must acquire the appropriate permits. All construction must be consistent with the requirements of City Code. ATTACHMENTS Location map Applicant's narrative and plans Engineer's memo SAPlanning\Planning FilesUpplicaGons\2018 Cases \Stephan Fen—ft Rd subd\PC memo.docx To whom it may concern, We are respectfully submitting this simple lot split application for your approval. We hope to build a new single family residence on each subject lot in the Ferncroft Lane neighborhood. We have done extensive research and have a location for a rain garden on each lot. This will help mitigate runoff and minimize any possible erosion; We have located and identified any wetlands on the property and will be taking steps to ensure that the lake and surrounding vegetation are protected by a buffer zone and other erosion control measures. We have submitted generous amounts of information and research and look forward to getting any feedback and suggestions. Thank you. Chris Stephan, Stephan Homes stephanhomes @frontiernet.net 612 -382 -4199 I LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lots 8, 9, 10, 11 and 12, Block 8, MINNETONKA MANOR, Hennepin County, Minnesota. PROPOSED LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF NORTHERLY PARCEL: Lot 8, Block 8, MINNETONKA MANOR, Hennepin County, Minnesota; and those parts of Lots 9 and 10, Block 8, MINNETONKA MANOR, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying northerly of the following described line: Commencing at the northwest comer of said Lot 8; thence on an assumed bearing of South 04 degrees 35 minutes 49 seconds East along the west line of said Lots 8, 9 and 10, a distance of 110.00 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence North 80 degrees 55 minutes 04 seconds East a distance of 240.34 feet to the southeasterly line of said Lot 9 and there terminating. Contains 22,171 Sq. Ft. (to the approximate 930 contour) PROPOSED LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF SOUTHERLY PARCEL: Lots 11 and 12, Block 8, MINNETONKA MANOR, Hennepin County, Minnesota; and Those parts of Lots 9 and 10, Block 8, MINNETONKA MANOR, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying southerly of the following described line: Commencing at the northwest corner of said Lot 8; thence on an assumed bearing of South 04 degrees 35 minutes 49 seconds East along the west line of said Lots 8, 9 and 10, a distance of 110.00 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence North 80 degrees 55 minutes 04 seconds East a distance of 240.34 feet to the southeasterly line of said Lot 9 and there terminating. Contains 20,773 Sq. Ft. (to the approximate 930 contour) SCOPE OF WORK & LIMITATIONS: 1. Showing the length and direction of boundary lines of the legal description listed above. The scope of our services does not include determining what you own, which is a legal matter. Please check the legal description with your records or consult with competent legal counsel, if necessary, to make sure that it is correct and that any matters of record, such as easements, that you wish to be included on the survey have been shown. 2. Showing the location of observed existing improvements we deem necessary for the survey. 3. Setting survey markers or verifying existing survey markers to establish the corners of the property. 4. We show a proposed division of the property. Please review the proposal to see that it is what you intend and submit to those governmental agencies that have jurisdiction to obtain their approvals, if you can, before making any decisions regarding the property. 5. This survey has been completed without the benefit of a current title commitment. There 6. may be existing easements or other encumbrances that would be revealed by a current title commitment. Therefore, this survey does not purport to show any easements or encumbrances other than the ones shown hereon. 7. Note that all building dimensions and building tie dimensions to the property lines, are taken from the siding and or stucco of the building. 8. The subject property resides in Zone Rl -D per the city of Shorewood's zoning map. While we show the building setback lines per the City of Shorewood's web site, we suggest you show this survey to the appropriate city officials to be sure that the setback lines are shown correctly. Do this BEFORE you use this survey to design anything for this site. 9. While we show a proposed location for this home or addition, we are not as familiar with your proposed plans as you, your architect, or the builder are. Review our proposed location of the improvements and proposed yard grades carefully to verify that they match your plans before construction begins. Also, we are not as familiar with local codes and minimum requirements as the local building and zoning officials in this community are. Be sure to show this survey to said officials, or any other officials that may have jurisdiction over the proposed improvements and obtain their approvals before beginning construction or planning improvements to the property. STANDARD SYMBOLS & CONVENTIONS: "0" Denotes iron survey marker, set, unless otherwise noted. ay - CATCH BASIN ,6— - FINE HYDRANT y - POWER POLE ® - TEAHHOLE ® - TELEPHONE PED. B - ELEQ TRANSFORLTER ® - DATE VALVE LIGHT POLE {A S/ \Q.,/ - TREE SSW ()Q TREE RELOVAL /— x� —/)F�\ - FENCE LINE —S - SANITARY SEWER LINE —W— - WATER LINE —O— = OAS LINE —Sr— - BMW DRAIN LINE —E - OVERHEAD UTILITY UNE —a65— - EXISTING CONTOUR —9s5— - PROPOSED CONTOUR PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION - DRAINAGE ARROW - CONCRETE SURFACE DATE REVISION DESCRIPTION 6/21/18 SHOW DELINEATED WETLAND 7/9/18 SHOW EXISTING & PROPOSED GRADING PROPOSED NELYPARCEL (WALK OU7) PROPOSED ELEVATIONS FIRST FLOOR (SUB - FLOOR) = 970.00 TOP OF FOUNDATION = 968.50 BASEMENT FLOOR = 960.50 GARAGE FLOOR = 96ZOO PROPOSED S)LYPARCEL (WALK OUT) PROPOSED ELEVATIONS FIRST FLOOR (SUB - FLOOR) = 971.00 TOP OF FOUNDATION = 969.50 BASEMENT FLOOR = 961.00 GARAGE FLOOR = 968.50 DRAWING ORIENTATION & SCALE N SCALE - 1' = 20' 0 20 40 PROPOSED HARDCOVER N'LY PARCEL House 2,696 Sq. Ft. vewa Driy 794 Sq. Ft. Walk 75 Sq. Ft. Deck 200 Sq. Ft. Landscape 100 Sq. Ft. TOTAL EXISTING HARDCOVER 3,665 Sq. Ft. AREA LOT TO APPROX." 22,171 Sq. Ft. PERCENTAGE OF HARDCOVER TO LOT 17.4% INSTALL SYLT PROPOSED 4' PVC SEHER_- . SERNLE CO11 -110V , " /NV= -951.95 (17ELD PERIFI7 9' PVC SANITARY SEMR MAIN -- , 0) " •� IA INSTALL ROPY COVSIRUCDOV -y ENTRANCE PER N07ES ENSnNO SANITARY SEVER MANHOLE (PER CITY AS -eUIL T)-- RIM =96U91 INV= 952.11 INSTALL %TFENCE` - -- 9' PVC SANITARY 5EHER MAIN �146 69 om x (�0 y j J �o `o rl *4q Edga Of da/a,aoMd wolf -d, oa dw. S 897551' E par arh- -- 202.12 -- i l l la °I! I I I 1 iP IT cc_�pI I -I ll_i i II II N xI6 �� I I II P Ti¢�catks sgb4dlL�a I I 11-001 _ __- 0] LSa) I � �N.- -r-' 92 ' Number p _X_ _ ®63 ] SX� 1�✓ o g S S Possible Fu jre / 1 oh\ I /D we) 9 DEC1lj / ®'6 Y /J2. - _ �XI 619 Is , / 1 O N ypjyt�, ICI tw 00 a „ INSTALL Row CONSTRUCRON- /" ` ENTRANCE PER NOTES " &N9 !c ENSRNO 5ENEF SERNCE I \ T APPROXIMATE LOCA DOV-•% (REMOVE & CAP AT MANN) PROPOSED 4' PVC SEVER - -• SERNL COVNECROV S 1NV =95563 S (R— VERIFY) _19 I I Y U PROPOSED HARDCOVER S-LY PARCEL Mouse 2,696 Sq. Ft. Driveway 793 Sq. Ft. Walk 76 Sq. Ft. Deck 200 Sq. Ft. Landscape 100 Sq. Ft. TOTAL EXISTING HARDCOVER 3,864 Sq. Ft. AREA LOT TO APPROX.OHW 20,773 Sq. Ft. PERCENTAGE OF HARDCOVER TO LOT 18.6% CLIENT NAME/ JOB ADDRESS STEPHAN HOMES 4865 FERNCROFT DRIVE SHOREWOOD, MN I Il I -` /NST1A[L\SY`J x96 \ ;s 92A67 �I711,7753 Ftet\ \\ '� \\ \ \,PA \\ INSTALL R N cnEN (REFER 70 DETAIL) \- %NV -95.30 i �-•A � \ ?' \ \ \ '" \PUCE 1 -cr a s 4- hDPE SOLD PLPE '4' �10E AMAWWMli PIPE A. TJ IN1A-9510 , Rome I I ,') "3 H PLACE I-CY Ot If - _ RIPRAP Ar OU71E7 ,Is L �t -1 L / f�j^ I 1'�I ,kn \\ .)A'!!' 4p9g9a) /s&s / 4' HOPE SOU III�L�P /PE E = I I 7'F -• }' HOPE PERFLWA7ED P/PE •-- 4S�4a RAIN'a4AMN ,'I/ (REFER 70 DETAIL) a I ( / Pµ1 �/•}r+ � 220 I 1 2,0 1 a e" - a eI e bei i.e lbacks)- 11162 .Feet eo Filfjure J PO$$) 608 / / ' \ " Dwelling, .a o DECX 1] 4N1 x 9 1 -INSTALL 57LT FENCE \ 440 9609 ` 691 p2 py�Q X9626 xA521� 964.6) �7as C � PROPOSED NEIL --•, \ `` x QD�_ —`,r -- \ X 961.3 i\ &6427 63.91 / 9n 60 (�19)o9aa \ 0971 7 &7 x RECEIVED 07 o I \ 6 x96]5 / / 72' JUL 19 2018 I 97310 . O 111\ % 9) .9 a \�� 1j CITY OF SHOREWOOD " 9741jvy \ \ \ 9)].I — \ ]6 L A 9)315 yle Advance Surveying & Engineering, Co. 17917 Highway 7 Minnetonka, Minnesota 55345 Plane (952) 474 -7964 Web: www.advsur.com 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT nH PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER BY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSONALENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MILAN Jo a S. Rlnke 52716 LICENSE NO JULY 18, 2018 DATE DATE SURVEYED: APRIL 13, 2018 SURVEYED BY ADVANCED SURVEYING. & ENG., CO. DATE DRAFTED: JULY 18, 2018 SHEET TITLE PROPOSED LOT SPLIT SURVEY DRAWING NUMBER 180239 JR SHEET SIZE 22 X 34 SHEET N0. S1 SHEET OF EXISTING DRAINAGE MAP STORMWATER REQUIREMENTS PROPOSED DRAINAGE MAP I I E° _ y S 8925$1' E - -- I_ -- 78212-- 1i �1 (J I IJ �I I 111', `I Ill y, Y TN �� %+a<�1_II•,'S }11ri111 •� \1\ 1�' IG $. °�1 1 •• ` •` \ \ \� \�•• \`% t��\ "`:�� I � p s�e Future a I t 1 \ � � \ \\� •\ -,aw �a�•1 p-ra Rir \ \ a I rte` , —� � �- � ° — ' �I •'�', a _ _ � • - / ,'Iaz rtanr ""rri 0 / u� Owd i ,r 'W ��� t Ie 1 •JarJU Srra� / lop t S )fib•\\ \ �// Lase 1. RATE & VOLUME CONTROL - NO NET INCREASE IN RUNOFF RATE FROM EXISTING TO PROPOSED SITE CONDITIONS FOR THE ATLAS 14: 2, 10, 100 -YEAR STORM EVENTS. REFER TO STORMWATER RUNOFF RATE SUMMARY TABLE. 2. FILTRATION VOLUME EQUAL TO 2' OVER PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA A. NORTH RAIN GARDEN REQUIRED FILTRATION = 644 CF, PROVIDED = 1,040 CF B. SOUTH RAIN GARDEN REQUIRED FILTRATION = 644 CF, PROVIDED = 671 CF ARC cFAMW#W 574 APPLY f' ,►DOD OR p�A/yr �yp�� �Qy r„�pD�y EXISTING NORTH LOT STORMWATER RUNOFF RATE SUMMARY CFS EXISTING SOUTH LOT STORMWATER RUNOFF RATE SUMMARY CFS Roce a 'M`B'''ND FZXM- sRC O°" OT Osy r (CFS) (CFS) ("""a Nor AccanSO� NRC Dvr esao STORM EVENT NE1 (CFS) (WEST) NE2 (CFS) (EAST) STORM EVENT SE1 (CFS) (WEST) SE2 (CFS) (EAST) A9P0BnW .A= • sox OBaA47C 2 -YEAR 0.23 0.57 2 -YEAR 0.04 0.85 I I � , Z.&F 6VAQU5T/P'aY MV-WA a .s,,rm (DO NOT cia"we) SRC Dw= ".a -,, 10 -YEAR 0.50 1.22 10 YEAR 0.09 1.67 -III —III- 100 -YEAR 1.05 2.54 100 -YEAR 0.16 3.23 — III —III III -1c �D� III I �— III —III— •-- sr.,ueeor �8' Rio► -- ; PROPOSED NORTH LOT STORMWATER RUNOFF RATE SUMMARY (CFS) PROPOSED SOUTH LOT STORMWATER RUNOFF RATE SUMMARY (CFS) SAem/PR,1T "677MV STORM EVENT NP1(CFS) (WEST) NTE (CFS) (EAST) STORM EVENT SP1 (CFS) (WEST) STE (CFS) (EAST) PROPOSED AtbV OAW.&V DETAIL Nor 7n s1A� 2 -YEAR 0.18 0.39 2 -YEAR 0.06 0.18 10 -YEAR 0.36 0.84 10 -YEAR 0.10 1.37 100 -YEAR 0.70 2.54 100 -YEAR 0.18 3.16 DATE I REVISION DESCRIPTION DRAWING ORIENTATION & SCALE N SCALE - 1' = 20' 0 20 40 CLIENT NAME 1 JOB ADDRESS STEPHAN HOMES 4865 FERNCROFT DRIVE SHOREWOOD, MN 4 -ROPR war R" OR WY T" , PLRFV.VT" VR M T" SE=Ar Lwr m .sruea Advance Surveying & Engmeel%ng, CO. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECTRCATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY NE DR UNDER SE DIRECT SUPERNSION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONA GNEFR UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINN DATE SURVEYED: APRIL 13, 2018 SURVEYED BY ADVANCED SURVEYING. & ENG., CO. 17917 Highway Minnetonka, Minnesota 55345 Phone (952) 474 -7964 Web: www.admr.com XJo a S. Rinke 52716 DATE DRAFTED: JULY 18, 2018 ucENSE NO. JULY 18, 2018 DATE RECEIVE JUL 19 2018 CITY OF SHOREWOOD LE ,rFAW Ru.STlNG CON719UR - - -960- - - AZ=Mi0 SPOT ELEYA770N x 960.5 PROPOSED CON7191IR gBO ,VR M,,ICE ARROK - FWN' SILT FENCE/RIO ROLL — SF — RY/SIDYG DMhV449ls' AREA lD El PROPOSED VRAbV4aF AREA JD P1 SHEET TITLE SHEET SIZE 22 X 34 STORMWATER SHEETNO. MANAGEMENT PLAN DRAWING NUMBER S2 180239 JR SHEET 2OF2 n Ul W�/ W 01 O co O ® W N ry C)'? O J u- O U Existing Dwelling m ry0i M .\ / Um 'cfMtm Nm� I0 NI0 sf'Of�ln�mhmAhmmmm mlll Itia- � xe�- M N M<n IO Y] Or 0101�00� -Oe0 m001p m m; m t00 l N N �� m m E� 17�� N M m m t+1 ����� M MME M��N e1 m � m m � m 0 m m m oz: �IL7�� m m ,5. m U Om no ci u 200 om �+m i 2 2 m c�2 m m m m m 2 2' Z 2 2 2 2 c 2 m m E 2 2 2 2 2 L 2 $ 2 a 2 annaam c nn$nm_aao.n ana•_ nnm m m c c nm n „K_- ✓ .3 �2 /% ti / / /I /mr mmmmmmYOamoYm mmmmm6YYYY m7mmm�m Tvo Nm mmNamwco,c caam�v�oo �iL �. > > >�•mmmm «m�mc > >`a m'aa >o O 30 —�t0O �0000� mm m >> > > >> >m mmmmvv —'° 33 X93 h1 �. 'r l%9 / // // • / 'nom m �m m m .0 Ol mO a m p\j m m m m Y m ... m m m m m m m C m m m y [L M == :=' •-' •-' m m N 4m1 ❑000mmm moomo o❑ mmmmm�EoL o o 000000mmo 000 OLLLL$$oo omm gym / UoUofcaro az�c� rr�vnmin�����xwy3zrJOOz0C)L) i�a�o3333mrnozUmm V. / o�NCO.dwm�ma\ [�Mamlo�mmo. -NM Inmr�mrno�NM �•Imm�mrno�NM Imm� .<'b. I _ .Jfl6� / /I .ai•' AI'9M1y, / / /' //r A. �i� N [�1 V' Im / K m Ol �- }� N t�N 'tl' ' 7 d' Y v m 12. N N Wm. \ N N N N N N N M M M M M M M M M V V V'V' 'f0.0 en en it�is1 _OOl In 25,9- _o 0 0 'SaLL 9'l96� rg- 1\ \ \���-=z9\ �Iliry -� 1 \ .� w\ ail'\ \. \ \ HOLOMM� h 'a o \\ 420 \ \\ `N, zr.o -. 1 / ,u, I , vWALK b \lam WALK 4 M cl N N t� NNNN N m 0 3 VV 4�•L��3 n ` 0, \ N �O G n m e F ♦�© �r e 0 m E \ N �Y Q�Z". o�� p„ `ll YS m d O n O O Q N p N N m N O O m N m m d N i Q P Q Q Q Q L o 0 0 E E n n m m E nannnn n E m EE m m aa�m E m U) IL aa aa m- m "mm-o 00 oo E E y m ry0i M .\ / Um 'cfMtm Nm� I0 NI0 sf'Of�ln�mhmAhmmmm mlll Itia- � xe�- M N M<n IO Y] Or 0101�00� -Oe0 m001p m m; m t00 l N N �� m m E� 17�� N M m m t+1 ����� M MME M��N e1 m � m m � m 0 m m m oz: �IL7�� m m ,5. m U Om no ci u 200 om �+m i 2 2 m c�2 m m m m m 2 2' Z 2 2 2 2 c 2 m m E 2 2 2 2 2 L 2 $ 2 a 2 annaam c nn$nm_aao.n ana•_ nnm m m c c nm n „K_- ✓ .3 �2 /% ti / / /I /mr mmmmmmYOamoYm mmmmm6YYYY m7mmm�m Tvo Nm mmNamwco,c caam�v�oo �iL �. > > >�•mmmm «m�mc > >`a m'aa >o O 30 —�t0O �0000� mm m >> > > >> >m mmmmvv —'° 33 X93 h1 �. 'r l%9 / // // • / 'nom m �m m m .0 Ol mO a m p\j m m m m Y m ... m m m m m m m C m m m y [L M == :=' •-' •-' m m N 4m1 ❑000mmm moomo o❑ mmmmm�EoL o o 000000mmo 000 OLLLL$$oo omm gym / UoUofcaro az�c� rr�vnmin�����xwy3zrJOOz0C)L) i�a�o3333mrnozUmm V. / o�NCO.dwm�ma\ [�Mamlo�mmo. -NM Inmr�mrno�NM �•Imm�mrno�NM Imm� .<'b. I _ .Jfl6� / /I .ai•' AI'9M1y, / / /' //r A. �i� N [�1 V' Im / K m Ol �- }� N t�N 'tl' ' 7 d' Y v m 12. N N Wm. \ N N N N N N N M M M M M M M M M V V V'V' 'f0.0 en en it�is1 _OOl In 25,9- _o 0 0 'SaLL 9'l96� rg- 1\ \ \���-=z9\ �Iliry -� 1 \ .� w\ ail'\ \. \ \ HOLOMM� h 'a o \\ 420 \ \\ `N, zr.o -. 1 / ,u, I , vWALK b \lam WALK _ 3 A1, m e F ♦�© @ �• At, Yl m \ N �Y of aNja H Ab, ' -7"7, -_ AS IfoJouidi m A1, WSB 0 Memorandum To: Alyson Fauske From: Laura Rescorla Date: July 27, 2018 701 Xenia Avenue South i Suite 300 1 Minneapolis, MN 55416 1 (763) 541 -4800 Re: 4865 Ferncroft Drive City of Shorewood, MN WSB Project No. 011227 -000 The following documents were submitted for review of compliance with the City of Shorewood's Local Surface Water Management Plan: - S1 — Proposed Lot Split Survey, July 18, 2018 - S2 — Stormwater Management Plan, July 18, 2018 - Existing Conditions HydroCAD Results, July 19, 2018 - Proposed Conditions HydroCAD Results, July 19, 2018 See below for comments regarding compliance. 1. Per MPCA guidance for filtration systems, the following are recommended: a. At least two cleanouts per underdrain, one at the upstream end, one at the downstream end. Cleanouts should be 4 -inch diameter vertical non - perforated schedule 40 PVC pipe. b. Schedule 40 or SDR 35 smooth wall PVC pipe for underdrains. 2. Although they aren't likely to notably impact the results of the modeling, the following adjustments to the HydroCAD model are recommended. a. Model exfiltration at the elevation of the ground surface in the rain gardens (956.0). b. Verify the size of the draintile outlet for Pond NRG (4" on plans vs. 8" in model). 3. Note that the filtration volume required is 1 inch over the net new impervious area. In existing conditions, gravel can be counted as impervious (and given a CN of 98). 4. Provide groundwater data and verify that the low floor elevation is: a. 4 feet above groundwater elevations in the area. b. 2 feet above known historic high groundwater elevations. 5. Verify that there is at least 3 feet of separation from the bottom of the rain gardens to the groundwater elevation. 6. The owner will need to sign a Maintenance Agreement with the City for the rain gardens to ensure they will be maintained in good working ordeC - Building a legacy. Equal Opportunity Employer I wsbeng.com K: \011227- 000 \WR \4865 Ferncroft \20180727 4865 Ferncroft Drainage Review Memo.dou