Loading...
02-05-19 Planning Commission Meeting CITY OF SHOREWOOD COUNCIL CHAMBERS PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD TUESDAY FEBRUARY 5, 2019 7:00 P.M. A G E N D A CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL / (LIAISON) SCHEDULE DAVIS (Jan) ______ RIEDEL (Feb/Apr) ______ MADDY (May) ______ GORHAM (Mar) ______ EGGENBERGER (Feb) ______ 1. APPROVAL OF AGENDA 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES January 15, 2019 Regular Meeting  January 15, 2019 Joint Work Session with Park Commission  3. PUBLIC HEARINGS A) C.U.P. TO COLLOCATE ANTENNAS ON EXISTING MONOPOLE (continued from January 15, 2019) Applicant: Tower Engineering Professionals Location: 24283 Smithtown Road B) C.U.P. - ACCESSORY AREA OVER 1200 SQUARE FEET Applicant: Revision, LLC Location: 26820 Edgewood Road 4. OTHER BUSINESS A) PREAPPLICATION SKETCH REVIEW Applicant: Pulte Homes Location: 25400 State Highway 7 (Vacant Parcel) 5. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR 6. REPORTS Council Meeting Report  Draft next meeting agenda  7. ADJOURNMENT CITY OF SHOREWOOD COUNCIL CHAMBERS PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD TUESDAY, JANUARY 15, 2019 7:00 P.M. MINUTES CALL TO ORDER Chair Maddy called the meeting to order at 7:00 P.M. ROLL CALL Present: Chair Maddy; Commissioners Davis, Riedel, Eggenberger, and Gorham; Planning Director Darling; and, Council Liaison Johnson Absent: None 1. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Davis moved, Riedel seconded, approving the agenda for January 15, 2019, as presented. Motion passed 5/0. 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES  December 4, 2018 Eggenberger moved, Davis seconded, approving the Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of December 4, 2018, as presented. Motion passed 5/0. 3. PUBLIC HEARINGS Chair Maddy explained the composition and role of the Planning Commission, including the responsibility to hold public hearings and help develop the factual record for an application. The Planning Commission makes a non-binding, advisory recommendation to the City Council. A. PUBLIC HEARING – C.U.P. to Collocate Antennas on Existing Monopole Applicant: Tower Engineering Professionals, for Dish Network Location: 24283 Smithtown Road Director Darling explained that the applicant would like to collocate 3 additional antennas, 8 radio receiving units and other equipment on a new triangular array on the existing monopole tower at 24283 Smithtown Road. She gave a brief explanation of what is located in the surrounding areas. The applicant has requested additional time to complete their application but asked that the Commission open the public hearing and take any public testimony that there may be at tonight’s meeting and continue the Public Hearing to the February 5, 2019 meeting. Chair Maddy asked what the timeline would be for placing this equipment on the existing tower. The top of the tower contains an osprey nest. Director Darling stated that the applicants are planning to have the hardware installed prior to nesting season and complete hook up after nesting season. She noted that with the delay until February, it may be possible that installation of the hardware will also have to wait until after nesting season. CITY OF SHOREWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING JANUARY 15, 2019 Page 2 of 4 Commissioner Gorham asked about the fencing. Director Darling stated that the existing chain link fence is adequate for what is out there but they are proposing some additional slats. She explained that her concern with slats is the maintenance. She noted this area is currently very neat and tidy and there is limited visibility. Commissioner Riedel asked which C.U.P. provision of the code this application triggers. Director Darling stated that antenna collocation applications are specifically listed in the code for a C.U.P. She noted that since the applicant has to fly in, she did not believe they would be present at tonight’s hearing. Chair Maddy opened the Public Hearing at 7:06 P.M. and being there were no comments, closed the Public Hearing at 7:06 P.M. Chair Maddy reopened the Public Hearing at 7:07 P.M. in order to continue the Public Hearing to the February 5, 2019 meeting. Riedel moved, Davis seconded, to continue the Public Hearing for a C.U.P. to Collocate Antennae on the existing monopole at 24283 Smithtown Road for Tower Engineering Professionals on behalf of Dish Network, to the February 5, 2019 meeting. Motion passed 5/0. 4. OTHER BUSINESS - NONE 5. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR , Cindy Marr 6015 Chaska Road stated that she lives across from the Shorewood Landing sign. She asked if they had received her proposal. Chair Maddy explained that the Commission had all gotten a copy of the e-mail from Ms. Marr. Ms. Marr stated that she and her husband have been residents for 38 years and five of those years were spent without light pollution. She noted when the two-story office building was put in there was essentially a spot light shining on their property for years. She stated that she had complained to the City numerous times but nothing was done until there was a new owner who agreed to change the light on the south side of the building. She stated that about fifteen years ago their neighbors decided to put up spotlights in their trees and leave them on all night which completely flooded the southside of their property with light. She stated that they have dealt with that by purchasing window coverings that help block the light. She explained that when the senior facility was proposed, they came to the Planning Commission and explained that their biggest concern was the light pollution. She noted that at the time, two of the Commissioners agreed with their concerns. She stated that they are living in a very frustrating situation with both the building and the placement of the large white lights along the front of the building. She stated that she complained to the City three times and nothing happened even though she had suggested that they just agree to turn the lights off at 11:00 P.M. She stated that they have now added more lights in addition to lights on the pine trees along the berm that stay on all night long. She stated that even people across the highway have complained that the light was shining all the way over there. She stated that there are many other neighbors who have been adversely affected by the lights and explained that she had gotten signatures from twelve neighbors stating that they believe there is excessive lighting at this location. She asked the Planning Commission to go to the location with the lights fully turned on so they have a better idea of what the residents in this area have been dealing with. She stated that her request is for these lights to be turned off at 11:00 CITY OF SHOREWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING JANUARY 15, 2019 Page 3 of 4 P.M. She stated that she would like the City to come up with a lighting ordinance to protect the residents, especially for the people that live in the “middle zoning” that has residential near commercial. Chair Maddy asked which lights are giving Ms. Marr the most problem and whether measurements had been taken of the sign lighting. Planning Director Darling noted that measurements had been taken last year and the lights were in compliance with the .4-foot candles. She noted that holiday lights have nothing to block the glare and she had contacted Shorewood Landing and asked them to turn them off at 11:00 P.M. She explained that they were not crazy about the idea, but said that as soon as their maintenance man came back from vacation, they would have him put the lights on a timer. Ms. Marr stated that she is looking at the bigger picture in this situation. She stated that she feels the monument light is very dangerous and blinds them when they are in their driveway although it has improved with the adjustment of the fixture. She stated that because they have turned off the Christmas lights at Planning Director Darling’s request, they are now able to see all the other lights such as the flag pole, the lights to the sides and even the windows Commissioner Riedel asked which of the lights were not currently handled by the code requirements. Ms. Marr gave examples of Christmas lights and the roof lighting. Commissioner Riedel stated that he would be in support of strong restrictions on commercial lighting as well as prohibiting spotlighting in a residential area. He stated that aesthetically, if people choose to light up their property in a way that does not exceed a brilliance standard crossing the property line, he does not think that is within the purview of the City to step in. Ms. Marr stated that this light is shining across Highway 7 into the houses across the highway. Commissioner Riedel asked whether that was in conflict with the code requirements. Ms. Marr stated that she had been told that there is no ordinance for this type of lighting. She reiterated that she feels this company has put up an excessive amount of lighting at this location. She stated that she has been trying to resolve this issue with Shorewood Landing for two years. The Commission stated that they would like to take some time to investigate what the current code addresses with regard to lighting and consider addressing some concerns. Planning Director Darling stated that she will compile some information on the current ordinance and research what other cities are doing with regard to lighting and bring it back to a future meeting. Commissioner Gorham noted that the City of Plymouth has some detailed language regarding lighting in their ordinance and suggested Director Darling contact them. CITY OF SHOREWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING JANUARY 15, 2019 Page 4 of 4 6. REPORTS • Liaison to Council Council Liaison Johnson reported on matters considered and actions taken during the Council’s January 14, 2019, meeting (as detailed in the minutes for that meeting). Commissioner Riedel asked if the Commission could have copies of the minutes from both the Council and Planning Commission meetings where 6035 Spruce Hill Court had been discussed. • Draft Next Meeting Agenda Director Darling stated that she will set the regular meeting schedule for 2019 and have that as an item on the February meeting along with the antenna CUP application, a sketch plan for Boathouse Villages and a CUP for an oversized accessory structure. Commissioner Eggenberger explained that he will be unable to attend the second Council meeting in February. Commissioner Riedel volunteered to attend the February 25, 2019 Council meeting in place of Commissioner Eggenberger. 7. ADJOURNMENT Davis moved, Riedel seconded, adjourning the Planning Commission Meeting of January 15, 2019, at 7:33 P.M. Motion passed 5/0. CITY OF SHOREWOOD COUNCIL CHAMBERS JOINT PLANNING AND PARK COMMISSION MEETING 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD TUESDAY, JANUARY 15, 2019 7:30 P.M. MINUTES CONVENE JOINT PLANNING AND PARK COMMISSION WORK SESSION MEETING Chair Maddy called the meeting to order at 7:40 P.M. ROLL CALL Present: Planning Commission Chair Maddy; Planning Commissioners Gorham, Davis, Riedel, and Eggenberger; Park Commissioner Vassar; Planning Director Darling; Councilmember Johnson and Councilmember Siakel Absent: Park Commissioners Mangold, Ashmore, Barr and Rock APPROVAL OF AGENDA The Joint Planning and Park Commission had no changes to the proposed agenda. 1. HISTORY OF FIRE LANE USAGE Planning Director Darling gave a brief overview of recent discussions regarding use of fire lanes as outlined in her staff report. She gave a history of the use of fire lanes and how they originated. She reviewed the current fire lane locations and the type of access that is allowed. She noted that over time, private improvements have begun to creep into the fire lanes. She explained that the Code does not allow the fire lanes to be used by motorized vehicles, except for the fire lane directly adjacent to Crescent Beach. She stated that this fire lane allows it to be used for snowmobiles during the winter and parking of vehicles near the beach the rest of the year. She noted that the Code prohibits motor vehicle use between the hours of 10:00 P.M. and 7:00 A.M., Sunday through Thursday, and between 11:00 P.M. and 7:00 A.M. on Friday and Saturday and limits the speeds to 10 mph on public property. She stated that she had attached some information about what other cities have allowed with regard to vehicles. Park Commissioner Vassar asked about Crescent Beach and past issues with maintenance over the past year. Councilmember Siakel stated that half of Crescent Beach is in the City and the other half is in Tonka Bay. She explained that the City has had an agreement with Tonka Bay regarding maintenance and the City had approved a certain dollar amount every year for Tonka Bay to take care of the maintenance of the beach. She noted that the City also splits the cost of a summer lifeguard with Tonka Bay. Planning Commissioner Riedel stated that this issue is potentially complex because these fire lanes became public access points and in 1985, they were officially declared for public acces, however, there does not appear to have been markers or maintenance done on many of the fire lanes. He stated that it appears as though many people are not even aware that these fire lanes exist. He asked whether other areas of City land are marked and designated. He asked if the fire lanes were officially considered park land because of the 1985 ordinance. CITY OF SHOREWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING JANUARY 15, 2019 Page 2 of 9 Planning Director Darling stated that the City owns quite a bit of property but most of the parcels are compromised and frequently contain wetlands. She explained that typically these parcels do not have markers on them unless they were part of a plat. She stated that the fire lanes are considered public grounds. Chair Maddy noted that he does not believe that there is anything in the fire code that would consider these fire lanes so the City could decide to get rid of them without causing any problems from a fire standpoint. Planning Director Darling stated that she agreed and the term fire lane is more of a historic name and the Council could change the name to something like public access points. Commissioner Riedel asked if there were any provisions from the DNR regarding public access points to lakes, such as minimum width. Planning Director Darling stated that she was not aware of any provisions from the DNR with regard to public access points to lakes. Planning Commissioner Gorham asked if there were any fire lanes that stick out in Planning Director Darling’s mind as more of a maintenance and awareness issue where its use would dramatically change. He noted that the access point on Grant Lorenz appears as though it could easily be cleaned up to make a truly useable public access point. Planning Director Darling asked if he meant paving or putting down a gravel road. She stated that some of these fire lanes are more suited for pedestrian access because of the topography. She stated that several of the overgrown public access points would require tree removal in order to clean them up for vehicle access but would only require minor clearing for pedestrian access. Commissioner Riedel stated that he feels it is problematic to have public access points that are not visually recognizable, known or maintained. Planning Director Darling noted that she had attached two letters from residents to the report, but noted that she had received more after the packet went out and will make sure the Commission receives all of the letters submitted in the future. Chair Maddy reminded residents that they will read every letter sent in and that tonight’s meeting was just for advisement and discussion with no decisions being made. 2. PUBLIC TESTIMONY Duncan Storlie, 5375 Eureka Road, stated that he had lived in the City for 46 years and lives about three houses away from the fire lane from Birch Bluff to the lake. He noted that when he first moved in there were three or four families that got permission to build a dock for fishing purposes which was maintained by the group but after a few years it went by the wayside. He stated that over the years he had tried to maintain the fire lane a bit by removing fallen trees. He noted that there used to be signs posted, but pretty much everything has gone away now and the neighbors on each side have kind of taken it over as their own property. He stated they have mowed parts of the area and thrown their leaves and brush onto the fire lane. He stated that there used to be a stone stairway down to the lake but that has fallen apart. He stated that he thinks it is important for the City to maintain the fire lanes as well as post signs or somehow mark them as public access points to the lake. He stated that he thinks many of the adjacent CITY OF SHOREWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING JANUARY 15, 2019 Page 3 of 9 property owners just see the fire lanes as part of their own property. He gave the example of a home owner on Grant Lorenz that has planted arborvitae that he feels will fill the whole fire lane. He stated that these are useful pieces of public property and the City should take care of them. Mark Bongard, 26260 Birch Bluff Road, stated that he lives adjacent to the Grant Lorenz fire lane. He stated that when they bought the house, they did their due diligence and came to talk to the City and knew that the fire lane was a limited use fire lane. He stated that while they were building their house, they noticed snowmobiles using it, but they assumed once they actually moved in the use would slow down because the home was occupied. He stated that the use did not stop and increased when the lake froze over. He stated that there is a lot of coming and going at all hours of the day and night. He explained that they had built their house assuming that this was a pedestrian only fire lane so they put all of the bedrooms on the side of the house closest to the fire lane. He stated that they are sometimes awakened four times a night from cars and snowmobiles using the fire lane. He stated that as the weather changes and melts and refreezes and the ice heaves, it is tough for people to get through without revving their engines. He stated that they had assumed that the City would be enforcing the use of the fire lane, but that has not been the case. He stated that he put up signs of his own and spoke to the City asking if he had to take them down and was told he did not have to. He stated that he does not believe that the fire lane is his or that he has a right to take it over as part of his property, however he has spent a lot of time cleaning it up. He stated that they fully support the current terms of the fire lane as a pedestrian only access to the lake. He clarified that he was not the one who planted the arborvitae. Park Commissioner Vassar confirmed that the times Mr. Bongard found most bothersome was the winter use of the fire lane. Chair Maddy asked if Mr. Bongard had noticed any parking issues during any time of the year. Mr. Bongard stated that there are a lot of vehicles who park there. He stated that they have had people come to their home asking them to move the vehicles when there have been some triple-parked and it is people out on the lake and not their personal vehicles. Chair Maddy stated that there should not be vehicles parked on the fire lane, but he would like to know if there were a lot of people parking on Birch Bluff Road. Mr. Bongard stated that he has not seen too much of that and noted that occasionally people will park to drop off a canoe or kayak and then take their vehicle somewhere else. He reiterated that he supports the summer usage of the fire lane. Tim Leester, 26355 Oak Ridge Circle, stated that he has been a resident since 1993 and before that lived in Excelsior since 1971. He thanked the City for taking the time for a discussion about public lake access. He asked that the City to consider amending Fire Lane #3 to become a Level Two fire lane. He stated that would support the access hours and speed limits that were mentioned earlier. Tom Lesser, 26245 Birch Bluff Road, stated that he lives directly across the road from the Grant Lorenz fire lane. He stated that he has lived there five years and having lake access is a great benefit. He stated that he also hears a lot of snowmobile traffic at night and it is sometimes disruptive which is why he has problems with motorized vehicle access. He asked who would police the use if the City allowed the usage for certain hours of the day at certain speed limits. CITY OF SHOREWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING JANUARY 15, 2019 Page 4 of 9 Cathy Bongard, 26260 Birch Bluff Road, stated that she feels the impression has gotten out that they are against people using the Grant Lorenz access and they are not. She stated that they have enjoyed watching people walk to the lake with their dogs and children to access the lake year-round. She stated that what is not enjoyable is the snowmobiles because they are the loudest and much of the time are coming back and forth late at night. She reiterated her husband’s comment that they do not think of this as their personal property. She stated that they have been maintaining it because it had gotten very overgrown with buckthorn and debris. She stated that it is the motorized vehicles, the noise and the time of day that causes the most problems. She stated that maintaining public access to the lake is very important. She noted that the access on Eureka Road needs some work because the cliff there seems very dangerous. She stated that there is a home for sale right next to the beach which she sees as an opportunity for the City to purchase it and install a public fishing dock in that location. Diane Tessari, 5375 Eureka Road, stated that she has lived there since 2002 and has used the steep access at the end of Eureka Road and appreciates the public access points to the lake. She stated that she feels it is important to maintain the access points and not give any of them up. She stated that she does believe there is a great need for signage that outlines permissible activities as well as penalties for not following the rules. She stated that she also thinks the hours of operation need to be made very clear. She stated that allowing motorized vehicle access at Crescent Beach is sufficient and does not think people having to drive a few additional blocks to avoid disturbing residential areas is a hardship. Cheryl LeBrian, 4790 Lakeway Terrace, stated that she has lived there for 35 or 40 years. She stated that she believes that Lakeway Terrace on Lake William is a completely different situation than Lake Minnetonka. She stated that on Lake William there are no speed boats or noise. She stated that she thinks the ideas for signage, clearing and rules makes a lot of sense for the access points on Lake Minnetonka, but does not make sense for Lake William. She stated that the Lake William fire lane #10 has many old oak trees with a sixty-foot drop off and the street nearby is very narrow, so if people wanted to park and walk down that lane to the lake, she does not think fire trucks could get past. She stated that there is parking where the old Lyman Lodge used to be located that people use to park when they want to access the trail. She asked who owns the land that goes around this area on the Lake Minnetonka side. Planning Director Darling stated that is within another city. Chair Maddy noted that staff can check the County website when they are researching this item. Ms. LeBrian stated that if the City wanted to do anything on Lake William then this area already has a little baby gravel parking lot that people are using and the lake is easily accessible in this area because there is no grade change. She stated that they do not want to see the old oak trees cleared and signage posted all over. She asked that the City acknowledge that Lake William is completely different that Lake Minnetonka. She stated that at access point #8 a house was just torn down and it looks like they are going to try to put up two homes. She asked where the fire lane was in relation to this project. Planning Director Darling noted that the fire lane is adjacent to this project. Ms. LeBrian asked how the property owners would know if someone was proposing to buy one of the fire lanes on Lake William. CITY OF SHOREWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING JANUARY 15, 2019 Page 5 of 9 Planning Director Darling stated that if someone proposed that the City vacate the public easements, it would have to be through a public forum so the affected property owners in the vicinity would be notified, which would usually be the adjacent properties. Ms. LeBrian stated that the rumor mill is saying that the people who tore down the house are planning to approach the City about acquiring the fire lane. Mike Blomquist, 5425 Grant Lorenz Road, stated that he has lived here for five years and before the new house was built there had been no issues with snowmobiles or four-wheelers accessing the lake. He stated that he has never been woken up by a snowmobile or four-wheeler. He stated that Lake Minnetonka is a beautiful lake but it is one of the busiest in the Midwest. He stated that he thinks it is wrong to cut off access to the lake because everybody has been using the access up until when the Bongards moved in. He stated that he feels it is too beautiful of an area to cut off from the public. He confirmed that the Commissioners had gotten the slides and pictures that he had submitted with his letter. He noted that when he purchased his home five years ago, the realty description said that he would have fire lane access to take his snowmobile out onto the lake. Chair Maddy noted that fire lane #3 was never allowed to have motorized vehicles. Mr. Blomquist stated that no one ever questioned that or thought that is was only for non- motorized vehicles, even the South Minnetonka police officer that he spoke to. He stated that now that he knows the law, he takes his four-wheeler down to Crescent Beach to go out onto the lake and go fishing. He stated that he would like to see this fire lane changed to a Class #2. Tim Leester, 26355 Oak Ridge Circle, stated that he thinks it would be more disruptive to travel on a snowmobile down along the road to Crescent Beach than it would be to access the lake at fire lane #3. Chair Maddy closed the public testimony at 8:39 P.M. 3. DISCUSS FIRE LANE USAGE, DIRECTION TO STAFF AND/OR RECOMMENDATIONS TO CITY COUNCIL Planning Commissioner Davis stated that she would like to see the City survey the fire lanes and install markers so the City knows exactly where the boundaries are and what things may be encroaching. She stated that she thinks the surveying needs to be completed before the City can decide what to do with the property. Councilmember Siakel stated that on Birch Bluff Road there are four fire lanes within a half mile. She noted that she lives on Birch Bluff and noted that the owners prior to the Bongards only lived there during the summer months, which is probably why there weren’t earlier issues or complaints about snowmobiles using this access point. Planning Commissioner Riedel asked why so many fire lanes were created in such close proximity to each other. Planning Director Darling noted that in her research it appears as though there were even more fire lanes in the past and some of them have been vacated. She stated that past Councils and Commissions have prioritized the fire lanes that they felt were important to keep and maintain. CITY OF SHOREWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING JANUARY 15, 2019 Page 6 of 9 Planning Commissioner Eggenberger stated that he would like to get rid of the term fire lanes and call them something else. He stated that he would also like to have a discussion about whether they should be made park land. He stated that he also thinks it is important to discuss whether motorized access will be allowed as well as the hours of operation. He stated that he thinks part of the problem is that people do not know what the hours are. Planning Commissioner Davis stated that she thinks there are certain people that will not follow the rules even if they know the hours. Chair Maddy stated that the City could choose to put physical barriers in place that would keep out snowmobiles and allow access to pedestrians. Planning Commissioner Davis stated that she feels there is no reason for a car to drive down any of these fire lanes and certainly not the Grant Lorenz fire lane. She stated that she has lived in the City for 40 years and remembers when there used to be bollards there so a car could not drive down the access point. Chair Maddy stated that he agrees that if the City decides there are no motorized vehicles allowed, then some sort of physical barrier will have to be put into place. Planning Commissioner Riedel confirmed that currently the only access that allows motorized vehicles, including snowmobiles, is Crescent Beach. He stated that there is a larger issue of signage and whether it should go on all public access points or just the ones that are used and noted that the Lake William access points also need to be considered. Planning Commissioner Eggenberger stated that he agreed with Ms. LeBrian that the Lake William access points need to be considered apart from the Lake Minnetonka access points. Planning Commissioner Riedel stated that he agreed. Planning Commissioner Davis suggested that conservation be considered for those access points on Lake William, but noted that it would raise the question of maintenance. Planning Commissioner Riedel stated that he questions if the access points that allowed motorized vehicles were spread out to other points whether that would cut down the traffic and noise at the Grant Lorenz location. Planning Commissioner Davis stated that she has lived in the City longer than there have been snowmobile ordinances in place and feels that there is a reason that the City has gotten strict about snowmobiles. Chair Maddy stated that it seems very clear that the snowmobiles are the problem but asked what their options are for access if the City decides that this is a residential area and snowmobiles have no business accessing the lake by driving between two homes. Planning Director Darling explained that snowmobiles can access the lake through Crescent Beach as well as other communities in the area that have motorized vehicle access. Planning Commissioner Davis stated that she met two snowmobilers one night at Lord Fletcher’s who explained to her how incredibly difficult it is to get from Waconia to Lake Minnetonka. CITY OF SHOREWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING JANUARY 15, 2019 Page 7 of 9 Ms. Bongard stated that she knows that snowmobiles are allowed to drive along the edge of the road and asked if four-wheelers were also legal to travel on the edge of the road. Chair Maddy asked if the City had a specific snowmobile ordinance or if it also covered four- wheelers. Planning Director Darling stated that she would have to check. Councilmember Johnson stated that with regard to snowmobiles using the roads, the City ordinance states it is not allowed except when going to the closest place of entry to access the lake. Chair Maddy stated that he wanted to assure residents that the access points are a valued asset to the City and does not think anyone is looking at closing all of them and thinks the City would like to find a way for people to use them while still being respectful of the areas where the fire lanes are located. He stated that he thinks the first step is to survey all ten of the fire lanes and then take a look at what the City wants them to look like. He stated that he did not think Lake William needed to have four fire lanes and suggested that perhaps the City look into putting some of them into a conservation or selling them to adjacent property owners. Planning Commissioner Eggenberger stated that he would also like to have a discussion about the pros and cons of making them park land. Planning Commissioner Riedel stated that the options are doing nothing with the fire lanes that are unused, or put up signage indicating that they are public access. He stated that the City should also consider putting up barriers if the use of motorized vehicles is not allowed. Planning Commissioner Davis stated that she would like to see a physical barrier installed on Grant Lorenz to prevent cars and trucks from driving down to the lake. Planning Commissioner Riedel stated that he feels that everything as written from 1985 is fine, but needs to be managed, as well as signs put up, and it be somehow enforced. Park Commissioner Vassar stated that there will also need to be a discussion about who will maintain these access points. Chair Maddy asked if the group felt the need to change the categories and include a conservation category for some of the fire lanes on Lake William. Planning Commissioner Riedel stated that perhaps one of the new categories for the Lake William area is for a new category that states you are allowed to walk across the fire lane. He stated that it could be clear that the City would not maintain it or clear the brush but is available for pedestrian use. Planning Director Darling asked if the Commission was asking her to craft a definition for lesser usage than the current Level 1. Planning Commissioner Riedel stated that he is suggesting the City tweak the current definitions and say, for the low use areas, that this is something that is dedicated as public land and you are allowed to walk across it but that is all. He stated that he does think it is very important to have all ten fire lanes surveyed and staked. CITY OF SHOREWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING JANUARY 15, 2019 Page 8 of 9 Councilmember Siakel asked if the City had any surveys on file already. Planning Director Darling stated that she had a survey done for fire lane 1 but other than that she has not found any surveys in the files. Mr. Storlie stated that at the Eureka Road fire lane there used to be two fence posts and a cable. He explained that the cable is gone and the posts may still be there but hidden by some of the debris. He is not sure if they are official survey markers or just used by someone to mark it. He stated that the area has been used by the neighborhood to dump leaves and brush. He suggested that there be a designation called Permanent Green Space that only allows pedestrian foot traffic. Chair Maddy stated that there also should be consideration of changing the term from fire lane to something like public access ways. Planning Commissioner Eggenberger stated that if these areas are changed to park land, he does not think new designations will be needed. Planning Commissioner Davis stated that if these parcels became park land, she questioned whether the Park Commission could take them on and afford it. Chair Maddy stated that rather than creating a new designation or designating them as park land, perhaps it becomes more of an outlot that the City owns. Planning Director Darling stated that most of these are public rights-of-way. Planning Commissioner Eggenberger reiterated that he would like to see some of these melded into the parks because it is one less category to keep track of and maintain. Planning Commissioner Davis stated that there is only one member of the Parks Commission here, so she is not sure what their thoughts will be. Councilmember Siakel stated that she thinks putting this on the Parks Commission is a lot and their current budget would not support taking these on. Park Commissioner Vassar stated that there are some big things coming up for the Park Commission and taking this one would make other projects within the City more challenging. Ms. LeBrian asked if there was a way to have the Lake William fire lanes be turned into outlots. She stated that if they were sold to adjoining property owners what the tax value would be to the City. Planning Director Darling noted that the reason that fire lane 7 was an outlot was because there was an exchange of land. She stated that she does not foresee the same thing being able to happen with fire lanes 8, 9, and 10. She stated that if they were vacated, or incorporated into an existing lot, there would be no additional tax value to the City. She stated that what she is hearing the Planning and Park Commission say is that they would to take the existing three classifications and revise them into three new classifications. She noted that one would be pedestrian only, the next would be similar to what the current class 1 is, and the last category would allow for vehicles, parking and swimming access, which would be similar to the current Crescent Beach access. She asked whether the Commission would like a fourth category to allow for snowmobile access. CITY OF SHOREWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING JANUARY 15, 2019 Page 9 of 9 Planning Commissioner Riedel noted that currently the Eureka access point has the dock, which makes it a class 3. Planning Director Darling stated that the resident has stated that there has not been a dock at that location for many years, but it could still be included as an option for the future if residents want to take it over again. Chair Maddy asked if the Commission wanted to even allow motorized vehicles or hold off on that discussion until the surveys have been completed. The Consensus of the Commission was to wait discuss motorized vehicles and hours of operation until after some of the survey facts have been gathered . The Commission discussed that hours of operation for pedestrians are not really needed because people should be able to walk out onto the lake at midnight if they want to and would not be disturbing anyone. Chair Maddy suggested that hours of operation be discussed during the second round with the survey information. Planning Commissioner Riedel suggested that members of both the Planning and the Park Commission should physically go out to each site after they are surveyed. Chair Maddy asked what the Commission would like to do about private owners who have placed things in the fire lanes. Planning Director Darling stated that she believes this is something the City will need to address in the future. 4. ADJOURNMENT Davis moved, Riedel seconded, adjourning the Planning Commission Meeting of January 15, 2019, at 9:20 P.M. Motion passed 5/0. iu- CD 0�3 CD CD� ° y COD CD n 0 c00 2 x 00 P O CD k� CD w w CD CD 11w d N � o qQ r* � cu rD �' 'Cl CD CD ft E" O N CD .. O CD CD CD eD CD cn �i aQ `� CAD �. � ''f' ti �''• r�-- A� COD vOi � � � d A� C� w• • . 4, ? - ��� s `' �m Sri cot I ILL o N ? _q o C� � O o � 2 O 00 CD ao �o N • nom.. p�•.•{. ^^� CD �. Q7 fA � O C/l w w a. • CIN O J 0 x 0 0 0 d y 1uO J N i �' q � �:;- K CL rl CD CD CD Er � O•� � CD r r �- 'Or CD O .- O CD C O O w CL o CD O K O CD N � CD CD CD rr CnZ CD O CD C" C CD r�r O CD N w CD CD o � CL O �. CD CD CD o c• Opo a ��CO CD-� r��� CD CD CD v� rC�D CD 13, O . P. p CD O CD CL�wA. 0 H r O CD (7' O CD O Itz -e CD CD CD 0 d �- O � CD O CD C o o N `C3 p f r O O q s= ~ O � .� CD CD CL CD CD A� , rOr C CD P CCDD CD CD �0 n ?< • C4 CD CD N 0 d f3. � ... CL CD k ti O . CD CD N j O CCD tS n 0 .O1 CD O CD CD v� COD �' ''O .. O `C aqq CAD ✓r d CD O a ¢ (� -+ o o- oo co cD �- O � �. � o o �d O � .� CD CD w - , o �C' ?< • C4 CD sv CL LID O 0 '• CL t� CD n �' ''O O Ofd.. cr O '+ 0 O r+ N h n N O UQ vOi - O� C 0 o n n r! CD CD CD p - '�N -+ N - vi N p � ' CD Uq CD CD "s CD Q" O " n CD CD CD � O CT CD CD o 3' o o H o Q. n� �C O `O CD CD CD ' CL 0. CD CD O n CD - CD CD O G po 0 CD Q- PD N CD O. "�. ¢. �y • n CD 1 + CAD '+ U�Q ,� 'o Q ti O O � P.? O N i-t CD CL CL G7 r r p W Fph CD CD p., CD y W = CCDD ,. A— + p p �zr a Uq C4 CD CZ CD n r CD O CD CD CD . CD - ¢ �- Q 0 � . �-h rt CD Co 0 CD � �. o p rn O n CCD' O P—CD Cr CD CD �- v� N CD p CD - OO CD 5 w G CD O 1:L O CD CD CD CL cr P CD "' ?�. o ¢ ~ � CD r+ CD a voq CD 0 r r CD C CL CD aq C ° CD p c o o C° �. :° t� CD b �? €� o q P ctq C MA CD CD CD C4 x CD ro r+ ✓r d Page 3 Findings Comprehensive Plan: Staff finds that the application is consistent with the intent of the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance to encourage additional antennas on existing structures rather than to have additional freestanding towers constructed. Compatibility with present and future land uses, depreciate area: The ground equipment consists of an equipment cabinet and utility boxes placed near the ground. The equipment would be similar to the existing equipment in the area and not noticed by the traveling public, especially as the trees mature on the City Hall site directly south of the tower. The applicant has not proposed a generator or other equipment which would produce noise. Public Services: None needed. Finish: The antennas and all equipment should be of similar color to the existing antennas. Screening: The ground equipment would be behind the existing accessory building and would be behind the new trees and plantings on the city hall site. Because of the utility nature of the equipment, most people do not notice the additional equipment or antennas. The applicant has proposed to add slats to the chainlink fence to provide additional screening for the equipment. Should the Commission recommend the slats be included, staff recommends a condition that the applicant be required to maintain the equipment. The applicant also included a steel canopy with a metal roof over the cabinet that is not necessary for protecting the equipment. The canopy would be visible over the fence and is not customary for this type of equipment. Staff has requested that the canopy be removed. A condition to that effect is included below. Evaluation and Monitoring: The zoning ordinance requires all equipment to be consistent with the FCC's allowed radiation emission requirements. The applicant has included FCC certification of the proposed equipment. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the conditional use permit subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant must apply for and acquire all necessary building permits prior to beginning any construction on the site. 2. If slats are added to the fence for screening they shall be: 1) maintained by the applicant and 2) the same color as, or similar to the building. 3. Prior to issuance of any permits, the applicant shall remove the steel canopy from the plans and revise the scope of work to reflect the project. ATTACHMENTS: Location Map Applicants Narrative and Plans -3- Tonka Ba y s D L.R.T -Regional Trail d 0 i J O L C r CO c� Cf) i let e Subject O c� Property .n s s s RI Int s N Ir 0 300 600 1,200 Feet (II Yellow Tr H a + o e I � \1 �3W E R NEERING SIONALS Date: To: From: Subject: 12/3/18 City of Shorewood Denise Vliet CHARLOTTE OFFICE 10700 SIKES PLACE, SUITE 360 CHARLOTTE, NC 28277 980.202.5553 WWW.TEPGROUP.NET 1 . i tt EIVED DEC -5 2018 CI:fY OF SHOREWOOD Conditional Use Permit — Written Description of the Request Please see the answers below to the written description of the request: 1. Colocation is encouraged in the comprehensive plan. 2. Colocation on existing tower will not danger existing property 3. Colocation will not affect the city services or infrastructure. 4. Proposed collocation benefits the community by providing additional connectivity media. 5. Colocation is encouraged in the comprehensive plan. Please feel free to contact me with any questions. Sincerely, vp-;� Denise Vliet Senior Permitting Specialist Dvliet @tepgroup.net 980 - 202 -5233 CIVIL I GEOTECHNICAL I SURVEY I INSPECTION I STRUCTURAL I PM &E I ENVIRONMENTAL I CONSTRUCTION I SITE ACQUISITION SERVICES Nationwide Since 1997 NOTES: 1, VERTICAL DISTANCE BETWEEN PROPOSED AND EXISTING ANTENNAS BASED ON INFORMATION PROVIDED IN STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS. DISH WIRELESS TO CONFIRM WITH TOWER OWNER THE VERTICAL LEASE AREA RIGHTS AVAILABLE PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. EXISTING EQUIPMENT MAY OBSTRUCT DESIRED DISH WIRELESS RAD— CENTER, 2. TOWER FACE WIDTH /DIAMETER IS AN ESTIMATE FROM STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS. 3. ADD MID GROUND BUS BAR WHERE APPLICABLE PER LIGHTNING ZONE REQUIREMENTS. RAD CENTER FACE WIDTH OR DIAMETER HYBRID CABLE LENGTH 137'-O" :k l'-6"± 175' -0 "t 155' -0 "t Y T /TOWER 150' -0 "t /EXISTING ANTENNAS Ak 137' -0 "t q /PROPOSED ANTENNAS 0'-0" (REFERENCE) T /CONCRETE FINAL TOWER ELEVATION N.T.5. EXISTING ANTENNA BY OTHERS (TYP) PROPOSED DISH WIRELESS ANTENNA ARRAY, SEE PROPOSED ANTENNA LAYOUT, THIS SHEET, FOR DETAILS. EXISTING MONOPOLE TOWER ROUTE (1) HYBRID CABLE INSIDE TOWER TO PROPOSED DISH WIRELESS RAD CENTER PER SPECIFICATIONS OF STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS. SEE HYBRID CABLE NOTE, THIS SHEET, PROPOSED ERICSSON RADIO 0208 (TYP OF 3), SEE SHEET C -4 FOR DETAILS, PROPOSED ERICSSON RRUS E2 2 ' B29 (TYP OF 3), GP SEE SHEET C -4 FOR DETAILS. PROPOSED COLLAR MOUNT KIT BY COMMSCOPE (P /N: MC— DPM2M -6 -96, OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT) FUTURE LESSEE ANTENNA SPACE (TYP) PROPOSED JUMPER BETWEEN BETA 4415 RRU AND GAMMA ANTENNA (TYP OF 2), SEE SUPP, INFO. SHEET 1 OF 2,--/ PROPOSED LESSEE ANTENNA (TYP OF 3), SEE SHEET C -4 FOR DETAILS, 5 / /6 OG1 p• EXISTING MONOPOLE TOWER. SEE TABLE, THIS SHEET, FOR FACE WIDTH. n �N� 4 i S NO m� \17 . PROPOSED ANTENNA LAYOUT N.T.5. NOTE: PROPOSED RET CABLE 4415 RRU TO ANTENNA (1) PER SECTOR. BETA SECTOR TO BE DAISY CHAINED TO GAMMA. CABLES TO BE ROUTED ALONG TOWER STRUCTURE (NOT IN OPEN AIR) EQUIPMENT ELEVATION N.T.5. 1 P Q�P J Z� me �c m 80' M0 2 /` �J PROPOSED ERICSSON RADIO 4415 (TYP OF 2), SEE SHEET C -4 FOR DETAILS, EXISTING CLIMBING PEG (TYP) EXISTING SAFETY CLIMB PROPOSED RET CABLE (TYP OF 3), SEE SUPP, INFO. SHEET 1 OF 2. PROPOSED DISH WIRELESS \A­ AG I+A\1- ANTENNA LAYOUT NOTES: 1. THIS ANTENNA ORIENTATION PLAN IS A SCHEMATIC, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY TOWER ORIENTATION AND FIELD COORDINATE REQUIRED ADJUSTMENTS TO ACHIEVE THE DESIRED ANTENNA AZIMUTHS. 2, ANTENNA CENTERLINE HEIGHT REFERENCED FROM GROUND AT BASE OF TOWER, ASSUMING HEIGHT OF 0' -0" AT SAID REFERENCE POINT. 3, ALL ANTENNAS, CABLES AND MOUNTS SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TOWER ENGINEER'S RECOMMENDATIONS IN A MANNER CONSISTENT WITH THE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS REPORT. 4. ALL ANTENNA BRACKETS PER ANTENNA MANUFACTURER, OR EQUAL. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE REQUIRED MECHANICAL DOWN TILT WITH DISH WIRELESS. 5. ALL ANTENNA INFORMATION TO BE CONFIRMED WITH DISH WIRELESS RF DESIGN PRIOR TO INSTALLATION, 6. VERIFY POSITIONS AND AZIMUTH OF ANTENNAS WITH DISH WIRELESS PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 7. SECTOR FRAMES AND ANTENNAS SHOULD HAVE IDENTIFYING TORQUE MARKS SHOWN AFTER INSTALLATION. 8. ALL CLOSE -OUT PHOTOS ADHERE TO CLOSE -OUT DOCUMENTATION. 9. THE SIZE, HEIGHT, AND DIRECTION OF ALL ANTENNAS SHALL BE ADJUSTED TO MEET SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS DEPICTED BY THE LATEST APPROVED RFDS. EQUIPMENT TESTING: CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS: 1. ANTENNAS & RF JUMPERS: • ALL RF JUMPERS & ANTENNA PORTS MUST HAVE DOCUMENTED PASSING SYSTEM SWEEP TEST, • PIM TESTING IS REQUIRED FOR ALL INSTALLED ANTENNAS & FEEDLINES. • SYSTEM SWEEPS SHALL BE AT A RETURN LOSS OF S -I6db. • ALL SWEEPS MUST BE PROVIDED IN A PDF AS WELL AS ANRITSU (OR EQUAL) DATA FILE FORMAT. • FINAL ACCEPTANCE: PERFORM ALL TECHNICAL TESTS SPECIFIED IN THE CONSTRUCTION SOW, SECTION XIV 2. HYBRID CABLES: • ALL FIBER PAIRS MUST HAVE A DOCUMENTED PASSING POWER & A FIBER INSPECTION SCOPE TEST, • PASSING POWER TEST SHALL BE 5 3db. • REQUIRED FIBER TEST GEAR SHALL BE VIAVI JDSU FIT- SD103; P5000i FIBER SCOPE DIGITAL INSPECTION KIT; VIAVI 2303/11, OLS -35 OPTICAL LASER LIGHT SOURCE 1310/1550 NM, SM, INTERCHANGEABLE ADAPTER OR EQUAL. • ALL FIBER TEST RESULTS MUST BE PROVIDED IN PDF FORMAT. • FINAL ACCEPTANCE: PERFORM ALL TECHNICAL TESTS SPECIFIED IN THE CONSTRUCTION SOW, SECTION XIV INSTALLER NOTES: 1. SCHEMATIC LAYOUT ONLY. REFER TO SHEETS C -1 AND C -2 FOR EXACT EQUIPMENT LAYOUT, SIZES AND LOCATIONS OF ICE BRIDGE. 2. ALL CABLE SUPPORTS SHOULD BE BLOCKS WITH GROMMETS, NO SNAP -INS ARE ALLOWED. PREPARED FOR: • NW WIRELESS PREPARED BY: j TOWER ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS ►� 326 TRYON ROAD RALEIGH, NC 27603.3530 OFFICE: (919) 661-6351 www.tepgroup.net DRAWN BY: JHJ CHECKED BY: CP APPV'D: CSN SUBMITTALS SEE EQUIPMENT 1 ELEVATION, THIS 1 SHEET, FOR 1 DETAILS. 1 11 -30 -18 1 1 CP - - - - - - - - - - II 2 CP I t PROPOSED ERICSSON RADIO 0208 (TYP OF 3), SEE SHEET C -4 FOR DETAILS, PROPOSED ERICSSON RRUS E2 2 ' B29 (TYP OF 3), GP SEE SHEET C -4 FOR DETAILS. PROPOSED COLLAR MOUNT KIT BY COMMSCOPE (P /N: MC— DPM2M -6 -96, OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT) FUTURE LESSEE ANTENNA SPACE (TYP) PROPOSED JUMPER BETWEEN BETA 4415 RRU AND GAMMA ANTENNA (TYP OF 2), SEE SUPP, INFO. SHEET 1 OF 2,--/ PROPOSED LESSEE ANTENNA (TYP OF 3), SEE SHEET C -4 FOR DETAILS, 5 / /6 OG1 p• EXISTING MONOPOLE TOWER. SEE TABLE, THIS SHEET, FOR FACE WIDTH. n �N� 4 i S NO m� \17 . PROPOSED ANTENNA LAYOUT N.T.5. NOTE: PROPOSED RET CABLE 4415 RRU TO ANTENNA (1) PER SECTOR. BETA SECTOR TO BE DAISY CHAINED TO GAMMA. CABLES TO BE ROUTED ALONG TOWER STRUCTURE (NOT IN OPEN AIR) EQUIPMENT ELEVATION N.T.5. 1 P Q�P J Z� me �c m 80' M0 2 /` �J PROPOSED ERICSSON RADIO 4415 (TYP OF 2), SEE SHEET C -4 FOR DETAILS, EXISTING CLIMBING PEG (TYP) EXISTING SAFETY CLIMB PROPOSED RET CABLE (TYP OF 3), SEE SUPP, INFO. SHEET 1 OF 2. PROPOSED DISH WIRELESS \A­ AG I+A\1- ANTENNA LAYOUT NOTES: 1. THIS ANTENNA ORIENTATION PLAN IS A SCHEMATIC, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY TOWER ORIENTATION AND FIELD COORDINATE REQUIRED ADJUSTMENTS TO ACHIEVE THE DESIRED ANTENNA AZIMUTHS. 2, ANTENNA CENTERLINE HEIGHT REFERENCED FROM GROUND AT BASE OF TOWER, ASSUMING HEIGHT OF 0' -0" AT SAID REFERENCE POINT. 3, ALL ANTENNAS, CABLES AND MOUNTS SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TOWER ENGINEER'S RECOMMENDATIONS IN A MANNER CONSISTENT WITH THE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS REPORT. 4. ALL ANTENNA BRACKETS PER ANTENNA MANUFACTURER, OR EQUAL. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE REQUIRED MECHANICAL DOWN TILT WITH DISH WIRELESS. 5. ALL ANTENNA INFORMATION TO BE CONFIRMED WITH DISH WIRELESS RF DESIGN PRIOR TO INSTALLATION, 6. VERIFY POSITIONS AND AZIMUTH OF ANTENNAS WITH DISH WIRELESS PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 7. SECTOR FRAMES AND ANTENNAS SHOULD HAVE IDENTIFYING TORQUE MARKS SHOWN AFTER INSTALLATION. 8. ALL CLOSE -OUT PHOTOS ADHERE TO CLOSE -OUT DOCUMENTATION. 9. THE SIZE, HEIGHT, AND DIRECTION OF ALL ANTENNAS SHALL BE ADJUSTED TO MEET SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS DEPICTED BY THE LATEST APPROVED RFDS. EQUIPMENT TESTING: CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS: 1. ANTENNAS & RF JUMPERS: • ALL RF JUMPERS & ANTENNA PORTS MUST HAVE DOCUMENTED PASSING SYSTEM SWEEP TEST, • PIM TESTING IS REQUIRED FOR ALL INSTALLED ANTENNAS & FEEDLINES. • SYSTEM SWEEPS SHALL BE AT A RETURN LOSS OF S -I6db. • ALL SWEEPS MUST BE PROVIDED IN A PDF AS WELL AS ANRITSU (OR EQUAL) DATA FILE FORMAT. • FINAL ACCEPTANCE: PERFORM ALL TECHNICAL TESTS SPECIFIED IN THE CONSTRUCTION SOW, SECTION XIV 2. HYBRID CABLES: • ALL FIBER PAIRS MUST HAVE A DOCUMENTED PASSING POWER & A FIBER INSPECTION SCOPE TEST, • PASSING POWER TEST SHALL BE 5 3db. • REQUIRED FIBER TEST GEAR SHALL BE VIAVI JDSU FIT- SD103; P5000i FIBER SCOPE DIGITAL INSPECTION KIT; VIAVI 2303/11, OLS -35 OPTICAL LASER LIGHT SOURCE 1310/1550 NM, SM, INTERCHANGEABLE ADAPTER OR EQUAL. • ALL FIBER TEST RESULTS MUST BE PROVIDED IN PDF FORMAT. • FINAL ACCEPTANCE: PERFORM ALL TECHNICAL TESTS SPECIFIED IN THE CONSTRUCTION SOW, SECTION XIV INSTALLER NOTES: 1. SCHEMATIC LAYOUT ONLY. REFER TO SHEETS C -1 AND C -2 FOR EXACT EQUIPMENT LAYOUT, SIZES AND LOCATIONS OF ICE BRIDGE. 2. ALL CABLE SUPPORTS SHOULD BE BLOCKS WITH GROMMETS, NO SNAP -INS ARE ALLOWED. PREPARED FOR: • NW WIRELESS PREPARED BY: j TOWER ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS ►� 326 TRYON ROAD RALEIGH, NC 27603.3530 OFFICE: (919) 661-6351 www.tepgroup.net DRAWN BY: JHJ CHECKED BY: CP APPV'D: CSN SUBMITTALS DATE DESCRIPTION REV ISSUED BY 11 -28 -18 PRELIMINARY 0 CP 11 -30 -18 CONSTRUCTION 1 CP 12 -27 -18 CONSTRUCTION 2 CP THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS SET OF DOCUMENTS IS PROPRIETARY BY NATURE. REPRODUCTION OR CAUSING TO BE REPRODUCED THE WHOLE OR ANY PART OF THESE DRAWINGS WITHOUT THE PERMISSION OF TOWER ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS IS PROHIBITED. TEP NUMBER: 143982 DISH WIRELESS SITE ID: MN1070009A TOWER OWNER SITE ID: 81418 SITE ADDRESS: 24283 SMITHTOWN ROAD EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 (HENNEPIN COUNTY) SHEET TITLE: TOWER ELEVATION & ANTENNA LAYOUT SHEET NUMBER: C -3 HYBRID CABLE NOTE: PROPOSED HYBRID CABLE LENGTH: 175'-O'± (CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY) EXISTING CHAIN —LINK FENCED COMPOUND TO BE UPGRADED WITH PVC SLATS PAINTED TO MATCH THE BUILDING, SEE THIS SHEET FOR DETAIL. x x- PROPOSED HYBRID CABLE TO a, BE ROUTED TO PROPOSED DISH WIRELESS RAD CENTER, a ° SEE HYBRID CABLE NOTE, ° THIS SHEET, PROPOSED 4" WIDE RMC CONDUIT, SEE SHEET C -7 FOR DETAILS. EXISTING MONOPOLE TOWER. SEE SHEET C -3 FOR ELEVATION. EXISTING ICE BRIDGE BY OTHERS PROPOSED PVC SLAT INSERTS PAINTED TO MATCH BUILDING STRUCTURE EXISTING CHAIN -LINK FENCED COMPOUND TO BE UPGRADED WITH PVC SLATS U. COMPOUND FENCE UPGRADE SCALE: N.T.S. x EXISTING EMPTY PAD TO BE REMOVED AS NEEDED x x x APPROXIMATELY 15'-O"± ° (CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY) i a F— — — — — — — — — — — — — — +r x n° ° a -- — — - - — — — — — -- a ° n a : " I - � G , C ° X . ° :d x a a �x.. x ax . EXISTING 4' WIDE / ACCESS GATE EXISTING VAULT O T EXISTING TELCO PEDESTAL EXISTING BRICK BUILDING BY OTHERS !•e El a° COMPOUND PLAN SCALE: 3/1fi' = 1' -0" 0 4 8 SCALE IN FEET PROPOSED 8'- 0 "x8' -0" DISH WIRELESS AREA OF GROUND DISTURBANCE FOR BELOW GRADE GROUNDING SYSTEM PROPOSED 5'x7' DISH WIRELESS LEASE AREA PROPOSED 5'x7' DISH WIRELESS EOUIPMENT PLATFORM BY COMMSCOPE (P /N: MTC4045) WITH ICE CANOPY (P /N: MTC4045C), SEE SHEET C -2 FOR DETAILS, EXISTING GRAVEL WITHIN COMPOUND NOTES: 1. ALL SITE INFORMATION HAS BEEN PROVIDED BY THE CLIENT. TEP IS NOT LIABLE AND DOES NOT ASSUME RESPONSIBILITY FOR THIS CONTENT. 2. PROPOSED SATELLITE DISH LOCATION TO BE VERIFIED IN THE FIELD AT TIME OF CONSTRUCTION. PREPARED FOR: s WIRELESS PREPARED BY: TOWER ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS 326 TRYON ROAD RALEIGH, NC 27603 -3530 �►, OFFICE: (919) 661 -6351 www.tepgroup.net 4 � d DATE DESCRIPTION REV m LU PRELIMINARY t:1 `o 11 -30 -18 CONSTRUCTION 1 CP z CONSTRUCTION L (D — O) E 16 Q �# � C Q) LU f2 <L .. ow " 4 o x c� fir,.... � Lo 'LD N DRAWN BY: JHJ CHECKED BY: CP APPV'D: CSN SUBMITTALS DATE DESCRIPTION REV ISSUED BY 11 -28 -18 PRELIMINARY 0 CP 11 -30 -18 CONSTRUCTION 1 CP 12 -27 -18 CONSTRUCTION 2 CP THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS SET OF DOCUMENTS IS PROPRIETARY BY NATURE. REPRODUCTION OR CAUSING TO BE REPRODUCED THE WHOLE OR ANY PART OF THESE DRAWINGS WITHOUT THE PERMISSION OF TOWER ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS IS PROHIBITED. TEP NUMBER: 143982 DISH WIRELESS SITE ID: MN1070009A TOWER OWNER SITE ID: 81418 SITE ADDRESS: 24283 SMITHTOWN ROAD EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 (HENNEPIN COUNTY) SHEET TITLE: COMPOUND PLAN SHEET NUMBER: C -1 SAFETY NOTE: WHEN APPLICABLE, CONTRACTOR SHALL COVER PROPOSED (B'xB') HOLE IN PLATFORM GRATE TO PREVENT TRIPPING HAZARD. SEE OSHA STANDARDS, SECTION 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(4)(ii). PROPOSED DISH WIRELESS ICE CANOPY BY COMMSCOPE (P /N: MTC4045C OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT). SEE SHEET C -8 FOR DETAILS. PROPOSED DISH WIRELESS PLATFORM FOOT (TYP). SEE SHEET C -6 FOR DETAILS.- PROPOSED 5'x7' DISH WIRELESS EQUIPMENT PLATFORM WITH (4) EQUIPMENT PLATFORM FEET — PROPOSED 5'x7' DISH WIRELESS LEASE AREA PROPOSED STACKED ERICSSON EQUIPMENT CABINET PROPOSED 24 "x24 "x6" HOFFM AN BOX MOUNTED TO PROPOSED CABINET SUPPORT STRUCTURE- PROPOSED 8'- 0 "x8' -O" DISH WIRELESS AREA OF GROUND DISTURBANCE FOR BELOW GRADE GROUNDING SYSTEM PROPOSED HYBRID CABLE ROUTED UP TOWER TO PROPOSED DISH WIRELESS RAD CENTER PROPOSED MTC4045C PLATFORM CANOPY NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY. SEE SHEET C -B FOR DETAILS. NOTES: 1. WHEN APPLICABLE, LTE BACKHAUL ANTENNA LOCATION TO BE VERIFIED IN THE FIELD AT TIME OF CONSTRUCTION. 2. WHEN APPLICABLE, DISH WIRELESS SUPPORT PIPE SHALL BE POSITIONED AS TO AFFORD FUTURE DISH A CLEAR, UNOBSTRUCTED VIEW OF THE SOUTHERN SKY. 3. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE 4MIL BLACK PLASTIC BENEATH PROPOSED DISH WIRELESS EQUIPMENT PLATFORM AND LEGS. r ----------------------------------- - - - - -1 PROPOSED LTE ANTENNA FOR BACKHAUL MOUNTED TO I j PROPOSED H -FRAME I PROPOSED DISH WIRELESS UTILITY gipRACK MOUNTED TO PLATFORM ' r CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE CHECKED BY: WEATHERPROOF GFCI AND MOUNT j IT TO PROPOSED UTILITY RACK I I FUTURE TELCO BOX _ I PROPOSED 100A METER MOUNTED ° I I I TO PROPOSED UTILITY RACK I PROPOSED 100A ELECTRICAL I LOAD CENTER MOUNTED TO j 4° �3 I PROPOSED UTILITY RACK ° ° I I PROPOSED 100A SERVICE O � I ENTRANCE RATED DISCONNECT ♦ I MOUNTED TO PROPOSED UTILITY RACK I I magi. o PROPOSED GPS ANTENNA, I INSTALLED BY DISH WIRELESS L --------------- - - - - -J PROPOSED 2Y2" TYPE LB CONDUIT BODY FROM PROPOSED HOFFMAN SEE SHEET C -1 BOX TO PROPOSED BASEBAND UNIT FOR RMC LENGTH PROPOSED 4" WIDE RMC CONDUIT. SEE SHEET C -7 FOR DETAILS. z EQUIPMENT PLAN SCALE: Yz, = 1' -0" 0 2 4 SCALE IN FEET W PREPARED FOR: s WIRELE S S PREPARED BY: +� TOWER ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS i 326 TRYON ROAD RALEIGH, NC 27603 -3530 OFFICE: (919) 661 -6351 www,tepgroup.net DRAWN BY: JHJ CHECKED BY: CP v LOU iJ PRELIMINARY 0 °moo 1� 11 -30 -18 CONSTRUCTION r� off, z CONSTRUCTION 2 cv c 0 Q Lu magi. o �' CL (Dv.. O o ? Q z � cj 61 2 0 C py 0 %a73a N m to a DRAWN BY: JHJ CHECKED BY: CP APPV'D: CSN PRELIMINARY 0 SUBMITTALS DATE DESCRIPTION REV ISSUED BY 11 -28 -18 PRELIMINARY 0 CP 11 -30 -18 CONSTRUCTION 1 CP 12 -27 -18 CONSTRUCTION 2 CP THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS SET OF DOCUMENTS IS PROPRIETARY BY NATURE. REPRODUCTION OR CAUSING TO BE REPRODUCED THE WHOLE OR ANY PART OF THESE DRAWINGS WITHOUT THE PERMISSION OF TOWER ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS IS PROHIBITED. TEP NUMBER: 143982 DISH WIRELESS SITE ID: MN1070009A TOWER OWNER SITE ID: 81418 SITE ADDRESS: 24283 SMITHTOWN ROAD EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 (HENNEPIN COUNTY) SHEET TITLE: EQUIPMENT PLAN SHEET NUMBER: C-2 NOTES: 1. MOUNT PER MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS. 2. WESTELL BOXER CABINET TO BE INSTALLED BY OTHERS ON UTILITY RACK AS NEEDED. N N 2' -1Y2" FRONT VIEW EQUIPMENT PLATFORM FOOT DETAILS SCALE: 1" = 1' -0" NOTE: CABINET DETAILS TAKEN FROM DISH TECHNOLOGIES. SEE MANUFACTURER DRAWINGS FOR ADDITIONAL DETAILS. CABINET TO BE INSTALLED PER 1 MANUFACTURER SPECIFICATIONS. ICI X 9 � � 0 I 2'-2916' N TOP VIEW CABINET DETAILS SCALE: 3/a' = 1' -0" BACK VIEW X CO I t0 2' -3 %" SIDE VIEW O I N 2' -33 %" :E. SIDE VIEW N I N 0 1 2 SCALE IN FEET POWER CABINET AN 0, CABINETJDUR5 NOT'SHOWN< Oj2 /(DDF6 CLARITY DSESuNABLECABLETIES TP STRAP411E CABLES TO THE 'GABLEtAO' EG INTRATED; IN THESTAC�INf� W 0 2 4 SCALE IN FEET NOTE: HOFFMAN BOX DETAILS TAKEN FROM DISH TECHNOLOGIES. SEE MANUFACTURER DRAWINGS FOR ADDITIONAL DETAILS. CABINET TO BE INSTALLED PER MANUFACTURER SPECIFICATIONS. Contractor: Type 3R Screw -Cover Type 3R Boxes and Enclosures �Hr Wj Sgl A J 4.mma A (HOUNTWG HOLES) T T T amm 8 - 22 tzJ J PADLOCK 3mm 3 1mm STARE II^_' C I'll B H BoEr SgkB _ J A I OI 12,,'''1 3mm STARE 3 ""' B LC_ '"11 H DATE DESCRIPTION aoa, W. c ISSUED BY C1 i_ co Q a° Di t* x.41 LO t+.. G O Q co In 2 D J I I 3.84 m (1rwu w HOLES) 98 mm z rn `O U) c I U) a jam —�- A I I Eli ,_ 0 N 1 3 221mm I 20.00 I JHJ 3'2_ CP APPV'D: f"-5,0 mm I PADLOCK STAPIE fi 25 J f---- B —»{III C - - /[aH' ail 4 I fix A B C D E F G H I 1I 62 41m 41.6 me mm 41 a w emm 641 .e .e czns -c HOFFMAN BOX DETAILS N.T.S. PREPARED FOR: v WIRELESS PREPARED BY: TOWER ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS 326 TRYON ROAD RALEIGH, NC 27603 -3530 A OFFICE: (919) 661.6351 twww.tepgroup.net ppm- SUBMITTALS DATE DESCRIPTION (D ISSUED BY C1 i_ co Q a° Di t* z LO t+.. G O Q co In 2 LU C m a �a a c.° a z rn `O U) c U) a jam Si C H �. Eli ,_ 0 N 1L DRAWN BY- JHJ CHECKED BY: CP APPV'D: CSN SUBMITTALS DATE DESCRIPTION REV ISSUED BY 11 -28 -18 PRELIMINARY 0 CP 11 -30 —I8 CONSTRUCTION I CP THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS SET OF DOCUMENTS IS PROPRIETARY BY NATURE. REPRODUCTION OR CAUSING TO BE REPRODUCED THE WHOLE OR ANY PART OF THESE DRAWINGS WITHOUT THE PERMISSION OF TOWER ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS IS PROHIBITED. TEP NUMBER: 143982 DISH WIRELESS SITE ID: MN1070009A TOWER OWNER SITE ID: 81418 SITE ADDRESS: 24283 SMITHTOWN ROAD EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 (HENNEPIN COUNTY) SHEET TITLE: EQUIPMENT DETAILS SHEET NUMBER: C -5 ABOVE CANOPY W A CT Ml- 7' -0" B. —q11 Ln 0 I N PLATFORM CANOPY DETAILS N. T. S. C I oc N I DO PREPARED FOR: • WIRELESS PREPARED BY: TOWER ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS A� 326 TRYON ROAD RALEIGH, NC 27603.3530 OFFICE: (919) 661 -6351 www.tepgroup,net Es- DATE I DESCRIPTION REV 3 11 -28 -18 PRELIMINARY 0 CP 11 -30 -18 CONSTRUCTION 1 o— ar m � z Q U � CL u a o W,c te CIS =I p U7 tR L .— a d) CD N DRAWN BY: JHJ CHECKED BY: CID APPV'D: CSN SUBMITTALS DATE I DESCRIPTION REV I ISSUED BY 11 -28 -18 PRELIMINARY 0 CP 11 -30 -18 CONSTRUCTION 1 CP THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS SET OF DOCUMENTS IS PROPRIETARY BY NATURE. REPRODUCTION OR CAUSING TO BE REPRODUCED THE WHOLE OR ANY PART OF THESE DRAWINGS WITHOUT THE PERMISSION OF TOWER ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS IS PROHIBITED. TEP NUMBER: 143982 DISH WIRELESS SITE ID: MN1070009A TOWER OWNER SITE ID: 81418 SITE ADDRESS: 24283 SMITHTOWN ROAD EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 (HENNEPIN COUNTY) SHEET TITLE: PLATFORM CANOPY DETAILS SHEET NUMBER: 8 UTILITY DISTANCES: 1. PROPOSED DISH WIRELESS POWER FEEDER LENGTH (UNDERGROUND): 60' -0 "f (CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY) 2. PROPOSED DISH WIRELESS POWER FEEDER LENGTH (ABOVE GROUND): 190'-O"± (CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY) 3. PROPOSED DISH WIRELESS FIBER FEEDER LENGTH: 40'-O"± (CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY) W EXISTING UTILITY POLE (TYP) �.�' EXISTING AERIAL- MOUNTEC �.� TRANSFORMER PROPOSED OVERHEAD WIRE FOR POWER ROUTED FROM EXISTING TRANSFORMER IN PARKING LOT NORTHEAST OF COMPOUND (EXACT LOCATION T.B.D.). CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE. PROPOSED 3" CONDUIT FOR POWER FROM EXISTING UTILITY POLE RISER TO PROPOSED DISH WIRELESS 100A METER �44 PROPOSED SPARE 3" CONDUIT WITH PULL - STRING FOR FIBER FROM EXISTING TELCO PEDESTAL TO FUTURE DISH WIRELESS TELCO ENCLOSURE EXISTING TELCO PEDESTAL NOTES: COMPOUND UTILTY PLAN SCALE: Ys, = l' -0" 0 16 32 SCALE IN FEET 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL ARRANGE CONDUITS, WIRING, EQUIPMENT AND OTHER WORK AS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN AND SHEET E -2, PROVIDING REQUIRED CLEARANCES AND ACCESS PER NEC. WHERE FIELD ADJUSTMENTS ARE NECESSARY, COORDINATE WITH SITE CM AND DISH WIRELESS. 2. PULL BOX(ES) ARE REQUIRED WHEN THE EQUIVALENT OF THREE 90 DEGREE BENDS MAX, INCLUDING THE BENDS LOCATED AT AN OUTLET OR FITTING, ARE USED BETWEEN PULL POINTS; 150 FEET OF CONDUIT LENGTH IS EQUIVALENT TO AN ADDITIONAL 90 DEGREES. UTILITY NOTES: 1. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE SERVICE ROUTING & CONNECTION WITH LOCAL TELEPHONE AND POWER COMPANIES. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL FOLLOW LOCAL UTILITY COMPANY STANDARDS WHEN CONNECTING TO UTILITIES, PROVIDING REQUIRED CLEARANCES AND ACCESS PER NEC. LOCAL AND STATE BUILDING CODES SHALL GOVERN IN CASES WHERE UTILITY CO. STANDARDS DIFFER. 3. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE SPARE 3' TELCO CONDUIT WITH PULL - STRING FOR POTENTIAL FUTURE FIBER APPLICATIONS. PROPOSED MTC4045C PLATFORM CANOPY NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY. SEE SHEET C -8 FOR DETAILS. NOTE: PROPOSED 2r TYPE LB CONDUIT BODY FROM PROPOSED HOFFMAN BOX TO PROPOSED BASEBAND UNIT FOR FIBER CONNECTION lim PROPOSED (24 "x24 "x6 ") HOFFMAN BOX MOUNTED TO CABINET SUPPORT STRUCTURE ELECTRICAL ROUTING IS A SCHEMATIC. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY EQUIPMENT LOCATION AND ELECTRICAL ROUTING PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. PROPOSED 2" CONDUIT FROM LOAD CENTER TO ERICSSON CABINET EQUIPMENT PLATFORM UTILITY PLAN N.T.S. PROPOSED 1" CONDUIT FROM LOAD CENTER TO GFCI CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE WEATHERPROOF GFCI AND MOUNT IT TO PROPOSED H -FRAME PROPOSED TELCO BOX PROPOSED (1) SPARE 3" CONDUIT WITH PULL - STRING FOR FIBER TO BE STUBBED UP OUTSIDE COMPOUND FENCE, AWAY FROM GATE SWING RADIUS AND CAPPED AT 6" ABOVE GRADE PROPOSED 3" CONDUIT FOR POWER FROM UTILITY TRANSFORMER TO 100A \ METER PROPOSED 3" CONDUITS FOR POWER FROM 100A METER AND 100A S/E RATED DISCONNECT TO LOAD CENTER PROPOSED 100A ELECTRICAL LOAD CENTER PROPOSED GPS ANTENNA INSTALLER NOTE: SCHEMATIC LAYOUT ONLY. REFER TO SHEET C -2 FOR EXACT EQUIPMENT LAYOUT. W PREPARED FOR: s WIRELESS PREPARED BY: TOWER ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS 326 TRYON ROAD RALEIGH, NC 276033530 OFFICE: (919) 661.6351 www,lepgroup.net DATE DESCRIPTION REV ISSUED BY 11 -28 -18 PRELIMINARY L CP 11 -30 -18 CONSTRUCTION Lo 0 z CONSTRUCTION Lo m c- rn cm aA c LLI c (D � .. .2 a v N y 06p _w Z r 0 oEO a .. � z ,s Fa ix DRAWN BY: JHJ CHECKED BY: CP APPV'D: CSN p� C� I PROPOSED STACKED ERICSSON CABINET I..... _ PROPOSED (24 "x24 "x6 ") HOFFMAN BOX MOUNTED TO CABINET SUPPORT STRUCTURE ELECTRICAL ROUTING IS A SCHEMATIC. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY EQUIPMENT LOCATION AND ELECTRICAL ROUTING PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. PROPOSED 2" CONDUIT FROM LOAD CENTER TO ERICSSON CABINET EQUIPMENT PLATFORM UTILITY PLAN N.T.S. PROPOSED 1" CONDUIT FROM LOAD CENTER TO GFCI CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE WEATHERPROOF GFCI AND MOUNT IT TO PROPOSED H -FRAME PROPOSED TELCO BOX PROPOSED (1) SPARE 3" CONDUIT WITH PULL - STRING FOR FIBER TO BE STUBBED UP OUTSIDE COMPOUND FENCE, AWAY FROM GATE SWING RADIUS AND CAPPED AT 6" ABOVE GRADE PROPOSED 3" CONDUIT FOR POWER FROM UTILITY TRANSFORMER TO 100A \ METER PROPOSED 3" CONDUITS FOR POWER FROM 100A METER AND 100A S/E RATED DISCONNECT TO LOAD CENTER PROPOSED 100A ELECTRICAL LOAD CENTER PROPOSED GPS ANTENNA INSTALLER NOTE: SCHEMATIC LAYOUT ONLY. REFER TO SHEET C -2 FOR EXACT EQUIPMENT LAYOUT. W PREPARED FOR: s WIRELESS PREPARED BY: TOWER ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS 326 TRYON ROAD RALEIGH, NC 276033530 OFFICE: (919) 661.6351 www,lepgroup.net SUBMITTALS DATE DESCRIPTION REV ISSUED BY 11 -28 -18 PRELIMINARY L CP 11 -30 -18 CONSTRUCTION Lo 0 z CONSTRUCTION Lo m c- rn cm aA c LLI c (D � .. .2 a v N y 06p _w Z r 0 oEO a .. � z ,s Fa ix DRAWN BY: JHJ CHECKED BY: CP APPV'D: CSN SUBMITTALS DATE DESCRIPTION REV ISSUED BY 11 -28 -18 PRELIMINARY 0 CP 11 -30 -18 CONSTRUCTION 1 CP 12 -27 -18 CONSTRUCTION 2 CP THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS SET OF DOCUMENTS IS PROPRIETARY BY NATURE. REPRODUCTION OR CAUSING 70 BE REPRODUCED THE WHOLE OR ANY PART OF THESE DRAWINGS WITHOUT THE PERMISSION OF TOWER ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS IS PROHIBITED. TEP NUMBER: 143982 DISH WIRELESS SITE ID: MN1070009A TOWER OWNER SITE ID: 81418 SITE ADDRESS: 24283 SMITHTOWN ROAD EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 (HENNEPIN COUNTY) SHEET TITLE: UTILITY PLANS SHEET NUMBER: E -1 NOTE: ADD MID GROUND BUS BAR WHERE APPLICABLE PER LIGHTNING ZONE REQUIREMENTS. PROPOSED 4 "x12 "xY4" TINNED SECTOR GROUND BAR (TYP OF 3), SEE SHEET G -2 FOR DETAILS, PROPOSED 4"x12 "041" TINNED UPPER TOWER GROUND BAR PROPOSED 4 "x12 "xY4" TINNED LOWER TOWER GROUND BAR. SEE SHEET G -3 FOR DETAILS. CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL GBB EVERY 200' c do TOWER ELEVATION GROUNDING N.T.S. LEGEND GROUNDING CONDUCTOR - ABOVE GRADE - - -• GROUNDING CONDUCTOR - BELOW GRADE •• -••- GROUNDING ELECTRODE SYSTEM • EXOTHERMIC CONNECTION MECHANICAL CONNECTION GROUND INSPECTION /TEST WELL O GROUND ROD INSTALLER NOTE: SCHEMATIC LAYOUT ONLY. REFER TO SHEETS C -1 AND C -2 FOR EXACT EQUIPMENT LAYOUT, SIZES AND LOCATIONS OF ICE BRIDGE AND ANTENNA SUPPORT STRUCTURE. TOWER GROUNDING NOTE: ALL CONNECTIONS TO BE MECHANICAL ON TOWER. EXOTHERMIC WELDS ARE ONLY ALLOWED AT GRADE. #2 AWG BURIED GROUND PROPOSED EQUIPMENT RING 36" BELOW GRADE GROUND BAR BOND PROPOSED EQUIPMENT X12 AWG SOLID BARE TINNED BOND EQUIPMENT PLATFORM TO PROPOSED COPPER (TYP) (UNLESS GROUND BAR TO GROUNDING ELECTRODE NOTED OTHERWISE) GROUNDING ELECTRODE SYSTEM (TYP OF 4) SYSTEM (TYP OF 2) 1 ♦ / 1 ♦♦ 1 1 ♦♦ 1 ♦ 1 4 r 1 / � I 1 BOND EQUIPMENT 1 AS REQUIRED BY 1 MANUFACTURER { 1 1 1 1 1 1 BOND H —FRAME POST 1 TO UNI —STRUT (TYP)- 1 1 1 r ♦ ♦��- 1 1 \ 1 1 - - -- --------------------- BOND EQUIPMENT PLATFORM LEG TO BOND ICE BRIDGE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT PLATFORM (TYP OF 4) POSTS TO GROUND RING BOND(S) (TYP) TYPICAL GROUNDING PLAN SCHEMATIC N.T.S. BOND PROPOSED EQUIPMENT GROUND RING TO EXISTING TOWER GROUND RING (TYP OF 2) EXISTING TOWER GROUND RING (FIELD VERIFY) (1) PROPOSED 4"02%4" TINNED LOWER GROUND BUS BAR BOND PROPOSED LOWER TOWER GROUND BAR TO EXISTING TOWER GROUND RING (TYP OF 2) EXISTING MONOPOLE TOWER PREPARED FOR: 'sh WIRELESS I PREPARED BY: TOWER ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS 326 TRYON ROAD RALEIGH, NC 21603 -3530 OFFICE: (919) 661 -6351 www.tepgroup.net 4'4Appw- E � L cu p Lo ® 2 m C :D 0 Lu ate= «� c Qc. Q co cn � ij FLCL $46 z o 63 0° N DRAWN BY: JHJ CHECKED BY: CP APPV'D: CSN SUBMITTALS DATE DESCRIPTION REV ISSUED BY 11 -28 -18 PRELIMINARY 0 CP 11 -30 -18 CONSTRUCTION 1 CP 12 -27 -18 CONSTRUCTION 2 CP THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS SET OF DOCUMENTS IS PROPRIETARY BY NATURE. REPRODUCTION OR CAUSING TO BE REPRODUCED THE WHOLE OR ANY PART OF THESE DRAWINGS WITHOUT THE PERMISSION OF TOWER ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS IS PROHIBITED. TEP NUMBER: 143982 DISH WIRELESS SITE ID: MN1070009A TOWER OWNER SITE ID: 81418 SITE ADDRESS: 24283 SMITHTOWN ROAD EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 (HENNEPIN COUNTY) SHEET TITLE: GROUNDING NOTES & DETAILS SHEET NUMBER: G -1 GENERAL NOTES: 10. INSTALL ALL EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS ACCORDING TO MANUFACTURER'S 1. EVERY EFFORT HAS BEEN MADE IN THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS TO PROVIDE A SPECIFICATIONS, UNO, OR WHERE LOCAL CODES OR ORDINANCES DIRECT OTHERWISE. COMPLETE SCOPE OF WORK. MINOR DISCREPANCIES IN THE DRAWINGS AND /OR SPECIFICATIONS SHALL NOT EXCUSE CONTRACTORS FROM COMPLETING THE PROJECT AND 11. PROPOSED CELLULAR EQUIPMENT AND FIXTURES WILL BE FURNISHED BY OWNER AND IMPROVEMENTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE INTENT OF THESE DOCUMENTS. INSTALLED BY CONTRACTOR, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 2. ALL REFERENCES TO OWNER HEREIN SHALL BE CONSTRUED TO MEAN THE CARRIER OR ITS DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVE. 12. ANY SUBSTITUTIONS OF MATERIALS AND /OR EQUIPMENT, MUST BE APPROVED BY OWNER. 3. BIDDING REQUIREMENTS a. PRIOR TO THE SUBMISSION OF BIDS, VISIT THE JOB SITE TO BECOME FAMILIAR WITH ALL CONDITIONS AFFECTING THE PROPOSED PROJECT. VISIT THE SITE WITH THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS TO VERIFY FIELD DIMENSIONS AND CONDITIONS TO CONFIRM THAT THE PROJECT WILL BE ACCOMPLISHED AS SHOWN. b. PROVIDE NOTIFICATION TO OWNER IN WRITING OF ANY CONFLICTS, ERRORS, OR OMISSIONS PRIOR TO SUBMISSION OF PRICE PROPOSAL. IN THE EVENT OF DISCREPANCIES, PRICE THE MORE COSTLY OR EXTENSIVE WORK, UNLESS DIRECTED OTHERWISE. c. WHEN TOWER IS OWNED BY A THIRD PARTY, CONTACT TOWER OWNER REPRESENTATIVE FOR PARTICIPATION IN BID WALK. d. WHERE ANCHORING TO A CONCRETE ROOF SLAB, CONFIRM (PRIOR TO SUBMITTING BID) THE PRESENCE OF POST TENSION TENDONS. INCLUDE PROVISIONS FOR X —RAY PROCEDURES TO LOCATE THE TENDONS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 4. DRAWINGS ARE NOT TO BE SCALED. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS TAKE PRECEDENCE. CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS ARE INTENDED FOR DIAGRAMMATIC PURPOSES ONLY, UNO. 5. FIELD VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS, ELEVATIONS AND EXISTING CONDITIONS PRIOR TO BEGINNING ANY MATERIALS ORDERING, FABRICATION OR CONSTRUCTION WORK ON THIS PROJECT. BRING ANY DISCREPANCIES IMMEDIATELY TO THE ATTENTION OF THE OWNER AND RESOLVE BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK. 6. FURNISH ALL MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, LABOR, AND ANY REQUIREMENTS NECESSARY TO COMPLETE PROJECT AS DESCRIBED IN THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS AND CONSTRUCTION SOW. 7. SUPERVISE AND DIRECT THE PROJECT DESCRIBED IN THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS. PROVIDE ALL CONSTRUCTION MEANS, METHODS, TECHNIQUES, SEQUENCES, AND PROCEDURES FOR COORDINATING ALL PORTIONS OF THE WORK UNDER THE CONTRACT. 8. ALL WORK PERFORMED ON THE PROJECT AND MATERIALS INSTALLED SHALL BE IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE CODES, REGULATIONS, AND ORDINANCES. GIVE ALL NOTICES AND COMPLY WITH ALL LAWS, ORDINANCES, RULES, REGULATIONS AND LAWFUL ORDERS OF ANY PUBLIC AUTHORITY, MUNICIPAL AND UTILITY COMPANY SPECIFICATIONS, AND LOCAL AND STATE JURISDICTIONAL CODES APPLICABLE TO THE WORK. 9. CONSTRUCTION COORDINATION REQUIREMENTS a. NOTIFY OWNER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO START OF WORK. b. OBTAIN ALL PERMITS. SCHEDULE AND COORDINATE ALL INSPECTIONS. c. PROVIDE, AT THE PROJECT SITE, A FULL, CURRENT SET OF CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS FOR USE BY ALL PERSONNEL INVOLVED WITH THE PROJECT. d. RECEIVE WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION TO PROCEED WITH CONSTRUCTION PRIOR TO STARTING WORK ON ANY ITEM NOT CLEARLY DEFINED BY THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS. e. PERFORM WORK DURING OWNER'S PREFERRED HOURS TO AVOID DISTURBING NORMAL BUSINESS. f. PROVIDE FALL PROTECTION IN ACCORDANCE WITH FEDERAL, STATE, LOCAL, AND OWNER REQUIREMENTS. g. IF FAA LIGHTING AND MARKING IS PRESENT ON SITE AND IS POWERED BY ELECTRICAL SERVICE THAT IS TO BE INTERRUPTED, MAINTAIN THE NECESSARY LIGHTS DURING CONSTRUCTION AND NOTIFY THE PROPER AUTHORITIES IN THE EVENT OF A DISRUPTION. h. PROVIDE A PORTABLE FIRE EXTINGUISHER WITH A RATING OF NOT LESS THAN 2 —A OR 2 —A10BC WITHIN 75 FEET TRAVEL DISTANCE TO ALL PORTIONS OF PROJECT AREA DURING CONSTRUCTION. L STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS OF ADJACENT FACILITIES SHALL NOT BE ALTERED BY THIS CONSTRUCTION PROJECT, UNO. ENSURE THAT EXCAVATION DOES NOT AFFECT ADJACENT STRUCTURES. j. SEAL ALL PENETRATIONS THROUGH FIRE —RATED AREAS WITH U.L. LISTED OR FIRE MARSHALL — APPROVED MATERIALS, IF APPLICABLE. k. BURIED UTILITIES MAY EXIST IN THE AREA AND UTILITY INFORMATION SHOWN MAY NOT BE COMPLETE. CONTACT THE UTILITY LOCATE SERVICE A MINIMUM OF 48 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. I. COORDINATE ALL POWER INSTALLATION WITH POWER COMPANY AS REQUIRED. REPORT POWER INSTALLATION COORDINATION SOLUTION(S) TO OWNER. m. PROTECT EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS, EASEMENTS, PAVING, CURBING, ETC. DURING CONSTRUCTION. UPON COMPLETION OF WORK, REPAIR ANY DAMAGE THAT MAY HAVE OCCURRED DUE TO CONSTRUCTION ON OR ABOUT THE PROPERTY. n. KEEP GENERAL WORK AREA CLEAN AND HAZARD FREE DURING CONSTRUCTION AND DISPOSE OF ALL DIRT, DEBRIS, AND RUBBISH. REMOVE EQUIPMENT NOT SPECIFIED AS REMAINING ON THE PROPERTY OR PREMISES. SITE SHALL BE LEFT IN CLEAN CONDITION AND FREE FROM PAINT SPOTS, DUST, OR SMUDGES OF ANY NATURE. o. MAINTAIN THE INTEGRITY OF THE BUILDING ENVELOPE AND CONSTRUCT BARRIERS IN THE AREA OF WORK TO PREVENT DAMAGE FROM WEATHER AS WELL AS FROM CONSTRUCTION DUST AND DEBRIS. 13. DOCUMENT ALL CHANGES MADE IN THE FIELD BY MARKING UP THE APPROVED CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS AND SUBMITTING THE REDLINED SET TO OWNER UPON COMPLETION. DOCUMENT ALL WORK PERFORMED WITH PHOTOGRAPHS TO BE SUBMITTED WITH REDLINED CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS. 14. PROVIDE SUPPORTS FOR CABLES TO THE ELEVATION OF ALL INITIAL AND FUTURE ANTENNAS IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL MANUFACTURER'S REQUIREMENTS. 15. CONFIRM THAT THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS, MOUNT ANALYSIS AND ANY ASSOCIATED MODIFICATIONS HAVE BEEN FOLLOWED AND COMPLETED AS REQUIRED TO SUPPORT THE EQUIPMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS PROJECT. 16. KNOW AND OBSERVE MANUFACTURER'S MINIMUM BEND RADIUS SPECIFICATIONS BEFORE HANDLING HYBRID CABLES, RF CABLES, AND FIBER OPTIC LINES. 17. ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS STIPULATED IN THE CONSTRUCTION SCOPE OF WORK CONTRACT, REGARDLESS OF INCLUSION OR OMISSION FROM THE CONSTRUCTION DRAWING(S). ABBREVIATIONS A/C AIR CONDITIONING AFF ABOVE FINISHED FLOOR AGL ABOVE GROUND LEVEL, PRELIMINARY ABOVE GRADE LEVEL AWS ADVANCED WIRELESS SERVICE BBU BATTERY BACKUP UNIT BLDG BUILDING BLK BLOCKING CLG CEILING CLR CLEAR CONIC CONCRETE CONT CONTINUOUS D DEPTH DBL DOUBLE DEG DEGREE 0, DIA DIAMETER DIAG DIAGONAL ON DOWN DET DETAIL DWG DRAWING E EXISTING EA EACH ELEV, EL ELEVATION ELEC ELECTRICAL EQ EQUAL EQUIP EQUIPMENT EXT EXTERIOR FIF FIBER INTERFACE FRAME, FACILITY INTERFACE FRAME FIN FINISH FLUOR FLUORESCENT FLR FLOOR FT FOOT, FEET GA GAUGE GALV GALVANIZED GC GENERAL CONTRACTOR GRND GROUND GSM GLOBAL SYSTEM MOBILE GYP GYPSUM BOARD HORZ HORIZONTAL HR HOUR HT HEIGHT ID INSIDE DIAMETER IN INCH, INCHES INSUL INSULATION INT INTERIOR L LENGTH LBS POUNDS LTE LONG TERM EVOLUTION MAX MAXIMUM MECH MECHANICAL MTL METAL MFR MANUFACTURER MGR MANAGER MIMO MULTIPLE IN MULTIPLE OUT mMIMO MASSIVE MULTIPLE IN MULTIPLE OUT MIN MINIMUM MISC MISCELLANEOUS NA NOT APPLICABLE NIC NOT IN CONTRACT NO NUMBER NTS NOT TO SCALE OC ON CENTER OD OUTSIDE DIAMETER PCS PERSONAL COMMUNICATION SERVICE PDU POWER DISTRIBUTION UNIT PROJ PROJECT PROP PROPERTY PT PRESSURE TREATED PVC POLYVINYL CHLORIDE REQ REQUIRED RF RADIO FREQUENCY RM ROOM RO ROUGH OPENING RRH REMOTE RADIO HEAD SHT SHEET SIM SIMILAR SPEC SPECIFICATION SF SQUARE FOOT SS STAINLESS STEEL STL STEEL SUSP SUSPENDED TMA TOWER MOUNTED AMPLIFIER TND TINNED TYP TYPICAL UMTS UNIVERSAL MOBILE TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICE UNO UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE VERT VERTICAL W/ WITH W/O WITHOUT WCS WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SERVICE WP WATER PROOF 18. ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS STIPULATED I IN THE CONSTRUCTION SCOPE OF WORK CONTRACT, REGARDLESS OF INCLUSION OR OMISSION FORM THE CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS. 19. KNOW AND OBSERVE MANUFACTURER'S MINIMUM BEND RADIUS SPECIFICATIONS BEFORE HANDLING HYBRID CABLES, RF CABLES AND /OR FIBER OPTIC LINES. 20. ADHERENCE TO CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS AND CONSTRUCTION SOW ARE TO BE FOLLOWED. SCOPE OF WORK ALL PROPOSED EQUIPMENT INDICATED IN DRAWINGS IS FOR AN UNMANNED TRANSMISSION FACILITY FOR TELECOMMUNICATIONS WIRELESS SERVICE. THIS IS NOT AN ALL INCLUSIVE LIST. CONTRACTOR SHALL UTILIZE SPECIFIED EQUIPMENT PART OR ENGINEER APPROVED EQUIVALENT. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL NEEDED EQUIPMENT TO PROVIDE A FUNCTIONAL SITE. THE PROJECT GENERALLY CONSISTS OF THE FOLLOWING: • INSTALL (3) PROPOSED PANEL ANTENNAS (1 PER SECTOR) • INSTALL (3) RETs • INSTALL (1) PROPOSED COLLAR MOUNT KIT & ASSOCIATED JUMPERS (1 PER SECTOR) • INSTALL (8) PROPOSED RRUs & ASSOCIATED JUMPERS • INSTALL (1) PROPOSED HYBRID CABLE • INSTALL (1) PROPOSED CABLE LADDER FOR HYBRID SUPPORT (IF APPLICABLE) • INSTALL (1) PROPOSED METAL PLATFORM WITH CANOPY (IF APPLICABLE) FOR GROUND EQUIPMENT OR CONCRETE PAD (PER DESIGN) • INSTALL (1) PROPOSED ICE BRIDGE OR 4" RMC ON 4" CONCRETE SLEEPERS (PER DESIGN) • INSTALL (1) PROPOSED BATTERY BACKUP SYSTEM IN CABINET • INSTALL (1) PROPOSED PPC CABINET MOUNTED TO PROPOSED H —FRAME • INSTALL (1) PROPOSED SURGE SUPPRESSION DEVICE • INSTALL (1) PROPOSED EQUIPMENT CABINET • INSTALL (1) PROPOSED RBS CHASSIS IN PROPOSED EQUIPMENT CABINET • INSTALL (1) PROPOSED BASEBAND UNIT IN PROPOSED RBS CHASSIS • INSTALL (1) PROPOSED POWER CONDUIT FROM PLATFORM TO MEET —ME —POINT DESIGNATED BY POWER COMPANY • INSTALL (1) (IF REQUIRED) METER BASE FOR POWER METER ON PROPOSED H —FRAME • INSTALL (1) PROPOSED TELCO CONDUIT FROM PLATFORM TO MEET —ME —POINT DESIGNATED BY TELCO PROVIDER • INSTALL (1) PROPOSED NEMA4 TELCO —FIBER BOX MOUNTED TO PROPOSED H —FRAME • INSTALL (1) PROPOSED GPS ANTENNA WITH CABLE • INSTALL (1) PROPOSED LTE BACKHAUL ANTENNA WITH CABLE OR • INSTALL (1) PROPOSED DISH WIRELESS 3' -0" DISH ANTENNA FACING SOUTH ON PROPOSED PIPE MAST • INSTALL (1) PROPOSED PIPE MAST FOR DISH ANTENNA THE SIZE, HEIGHT AND DIRECTION OF ALL ANTENNAS SHALL BE ADJUSTED TO MEET SYSTEM REQUIREMENT DEPICTED BY THE LATEST APPROVED RFDS. I PROJECT NOTES 1. THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION HAS BEEN PROVIDED BY DISH WIRELESS FOR THIS PROJECT AND HAS NOT BEEN FIELD VERIFIED AS PART OF THIS PROJECT. a. EXISTING TOWER, MOUNT AND EQUIPMENT ELEVATIONS b. DESIGN PACKAGE BASED ON THE APPLICATION #: T.B.D. 2. A STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS TO DETERMINE THE TOWER CAPACITY TO SUPPORT THIS PROPOSED EQUIPMENT WAS PERFORMED FOR DISH WIRELESS OUTSIDE THE SCOPE OF THIS PROJECT. 3. CONFIRM THAT THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS, MOUNT ANALYSIS AND ANY ASSOCIATED MODIFICATIONS HAVE BEEN FOLLOWED AND COMPLETED AS REQUIRED TO SUPPORT THE EQUIPMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS PROJECT. PREPARED FOR: NW WIRELESS PREPARED BY: Nil A TOWER ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS 326 TRYON ROAD RALEIGH, NC 27603.3530 OFFICE: (919) 661 -6351 www.tepgroup.net A d DATE DESCRIPTION REV a W PRELIMINARY C5 CP 11 -30 -18 CONSTRUCTION rX? ® o rte (D C 2 Q CONSTRUCTION u7 *k . p as Lu (d C Iv Q ee Q Z t- ._ co a (D E z N a O Aw 2 G� G DRAWN BY: JHJ CHECKED BY: CP APPV'D: CSN SUBMITTALS DATE DESCRIPTION REV ISSUED BY 11 -28 -18 PRELIMINARY 0 CP 11 -30 -18 CONSTRUCTION 1 CP 12 -27 -18 CONSTRUCTION 2 CP THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS SET OF DOCUMENTS IS PROPRIETARY BY NATURE. REPRODUCTION OR CAUSING TO BE REPRODUCED THE WHOLE OR ANY PART OF THESE DRAWINGS WITHOUT THE PERMISSION OF TOWER ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS IS PROHIBITED. TEP NUMBER: 143982 DISH WIRELESS SITE ID: MN1070009A TOWER OWNER SITE ID: 81418 SITE ADDRESS: 24283 SMITHTOWN ROAD EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 (HENNEPIN COUNTY) SHEET TITLE: GENERAL NOTES SHEET NUMBER: GN -1 r N. T 0 T T /e� unnolyl!ws fi peon u o�y� ua fi a�. �I h oz, 4T 009 0 £T 0 uMojwU,IS T ^ fi o e Jib a }clod �d-usJeW T T fi D f �a2Jo JogJy �d ysJeW fi fi T T a N 1 fi T m Sod PHAA fi T T Gj F ` fi V' T N Q IJI0 IAA n� �r19 LUI ATF� ',� � T T T fi auld T V T T T .0 T T J,co T e�uojauu!W a�e-j LL }aadoad pefgnS Id aMeWUAJ8 pU��s1 wsb, Memorandum To: Marie Darling, Shorewood City Planner From: Alyson Fauske, PE, City Engineer Date: January 28, 2019 Re: 26820 Edgewood Road Conditional Use Permit Review WSB Project No. 013509 -000 This review is based on the December 20, 2018 drawing prepared by Advanced Surveying. 1. Based on the plan submitted, the proposed detached garage will be oriented such that the drainage from the new impervious surface will remain on the property. 2 2. Before a building permit is issued the applicant must submit drainage calculations for review and ° approval. 0 z w m U) 0 0 ao v <t m m n m -q- LO z ui J 0 a w z z_ 0 0 r� W F- co W z W ¢ z W X 0 r` GAGroup DatalMunicipal\CGents- Cities - Countles \Shoremod\DevelopmentCUPs\26820 Edgemod Rd 20190128 memo AF.doa 26820 Edgewood Rd, Shorewood MN Description of Request for Condition Use Permit: 1. Request for Condition Use Permit for an Accessory Structure. Background/ Current Condition: The property at 26820 Edgewood is a 55,288 sqft property with a primary structure. We are seeking approval for a Condition Use Permit to add a 3 -car garage accessory structure to the property to accommodate storage space as well as parking for older children that live at the residence. The request of the detached garage exceeds the 1,200 sqft requirement of the zoning districts requirements of accessory space. The current home has an attached 3 garage, which has a total floor area of 1,054 sqft. We meet the following requirements for an accessory structure in the current Condition Use Permit Guidelines; 1. The total Accessory Structure floor area does not exceed the floor area of the existing principal structure. The Principal Structure floor area is 3,690 sqft and the total Accessory Structure being proposed is 2,107 sqft. 2. The total Accessory Structure does not exceed 10% of the minimum lot area (4,000 sqft). 3. The architectural characteristics of the structure being proposed are in like kind with the primary structure and materials as well as finishes will match the current primary Structure. 4. There are no other existing nonconforming accessory structures on the property. RECEIVED JAN 14 2019 CITY OF SHOREWOOD <� o o o q 0 LL U �o� m W ° N G OD .0 o 4 N at i 01 c o> m�a� N Z '�I W � LLI W W �ma�ok' N a Z q �g���p o 40 (a O W w w W^ S& 9% E w o CIO w w .0 �a3 F'2s € tY1 rr 1 nJ 1 1 o IV j O a CO) rn O �� g w w g w b w ■�© ®moot Z w C7 a O N O n X I I � I i N � i I x q n 2 �\ X s 08 08'0 o' R\ X -1 \nl o'sl \,,,tl, "'1 10 -sbr\\ t-4 " 315/% 2. �\� Y� ;1'9O Ilse Idr I dy,$$ x � \\ \ \\_ _ __ X OJ _ „ - P ~•: iP� �cw.0 6o'n9° x00 s� �� -- ------ -- --- ------ �-- - --- - -- `\--- - \�-----\�- ---- \-�-\\\ " Ir o \ _�\ \ rssr �\ \ <\---- - - - - -� F- m� w n ` \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \'� \ \ \\ \ Orr Flo°r3_. Yo �o LL, P Q cwi o CY i iR 5,o f: •d••._ S�' \\ P J / / / / Ada h F•� U wa o a 1 _7 9b N v �5 w o � �w rnQ � °' \�`� \ \ \•„ \ P \W /" Pte° 3 za � // pi�y�l�.�,. 11 =�?S � \ \\ �� /9 �s '` �� � / /�/ � ��/ `� $ Y X _ m r, > >- ...•u P \�� \C \'" 3 \ m FiV ^P° rF 1 \ / d'/ �°' °� w a w 3 ¢ O z pj 1A \ \ \ c ° \ I V� N / pq� 7sM c w Y- s_'____ �_.______ / $E \ \\ �.g-y c \ \\ 'T c ,N° FS- ------ __ _ / �' 1- F- n. 1 \ < ° •vl a + ! X 1 jC t urinous I'� _ u n n o n, a oj. P \� P \\� \ \'. \ w \� `^ ��% \ a ,�• �c �` o tl .\ xstM9 $ I _ - _ _ - .42 O rr f-"S wz 1' ,� ` \\'�__.\ \�,\ / 15.t)_ -1 k• W n" P �� " 177 '� I \ \ - \ Z e\ \\ `\\ \(/ \ - \\ . `� I.t `Ye NSF P _`^,, m } \ �\e \ X— �id� \ ''pp \ 9 a\ / sF �. ;& T sr SF F;�— SF —� sF,� \ \ ; \ \ \ W N LL.. uj e\ "° a\( r XP �^ a �o �_ ''� 6" /TOPE i N 06'3.5'00 W l 2 V \\ �� >a��\ ��' \P F^ W P / _ �P e I Zt 6 H� �' IIII 15ff°� �� a n 7 Y! MSJ �e d� III- E _ � o ., 2 >�. s SS om�Z mv° � c �5 .p o.��'v cE wy'6o €a �4a I I 3 _ wen 5- 3 .�y o c v e T "T o u3i €y c5: o iJ' u?o.�� �' L 'Ew '5 v `�o�Ez$ a tiso >E yh� E ,� "�, Fc 7 - 0 II _ c ppp 90 zo't v52$^+ o e'E o04 E �a ra sviE �.2.fi € s 5 E� v - ev vv 1.1 - •vo'�a A °;y� H$'Sv 'e�Eo ° o >T eo e" v eo °.yeiio �� -Q.S° ,_ €c v ° moat .cs e0 2>a 'o .5 `�'a A� 'E A. .6N� 8 � a.cG ._9 .5 u E m Yoo 3'S 3�° ° � � a da tiro oG €9 '- $° o ¢° Ci `C RV —_ � a� wra��� en:c ••,G vo -,$ ��a, .°.2 °v o �3w d. >ra E o w o�`".�� - D oaa �� �> .c °50 ,¢ c ra •5 a x o ° 0 „ ° ° 0�' E a $ w o - _d' L o u .S N an a a^ c 3E `5 i; .a° w E' r,° ,n S z S'' .M .,� I I g II o G ".c v.° «4o r"cu4'w� fi sa c�:ao m ng3v ;i o " vv " oY w w a�.30 �E �i m oM o°TE �.L _eov ..E3,�o.�o ae_ o b� v .p wG :g ° 1 w° a�° °b� o.0 v�oN « °00v c �Gar«-z�. "ro� -A° ��Eoo 3�E• :aco .`C�$ y°.5 av Ew�aca� n"u c v �'°ma ra 'c'" 'S pG� °Zo ..oa you '3 °a o��STGg o �� _ °w_ ate€ a s x; a € v. "s o� yLLYY LLLL N N �1 1 F a0 L z W H ° li° _ a= O LL LL LL LL LL LL 1 r_ V Q LL LL LL I+'L LL LL .5 " l IIII �$hGm,00 ^.a �s v co-vvvov Nm cvvvo -vc �m v' \••iii �C a CyF C•G ._OG N'O� uvi uG i��(o �... O�q °�.G`o Yn wq'c O e y•7 ww wwwwww Nm wwwwwww cZv'a °_' °5 °�'5'O °- '9aco ° .r3"v v - 08 �E$ Ev° v ' - vw .A'°^ €E c.0 €3 a0 umia�o mcaN° NN F ¢wa�nr1OO F�w �_D > Q�� �� w�3 .5 > E a�w wm �w m u GO VI t'i F G T N P.'u '�- C C C.�°G' O T a y 3 5 al Z '�. O y�9 v� €.5 C 3 j u ruv .� _ `"y _ u _Y✓. rJ' a o o. u•° - > ONNIII l�mw m O jMNNON wN ! �v°ico QgA.5 mo "T k"7` E G' °a c'$Sn o -�.a :a s F'S3 Ea .°, zn .�€ a °w� vN ¢ ow ww o .c ° .m n o N° w U w e a° 1-1 ° o w N o CC�� II1 o NG G9� �aa p/�- o S 9 _ o a�� :Q CSil ti oy$dca� v'b.`c v'n �,o °� "�> $ °an 9a �a° 9 E _`= 3v aY q1v Zq9 0>. Q u ° € "��' Oa3 9a o v T > > a .N Y .y o T rn c O € $' z U o �.' H 3 e° a o ¢ 1 c°e ¢ 0 = ►!V ZO :. -s «rN °n .]'g �'a'^'?'a `�. a�,o c,y sa' - e °a -v_ o n vc`�oi a 0'i Z �'.° € �° Ey '°k7 aam t =' - n.a d"T'.' $ 3 "�' z5 � = d ° > m ° > o,� e0 o'er �b0 a„ € oz '- ,a „a.5 3 `�r� p ?? O O$ €° .. ,Y, U'" '"' A wts �o w o w ¢ o F e .G w 0nc "'a E n'� o �-3 ° �v 3 N B. o "2w a _ v > "'S ❑ a� a� h. -a .0 S °c9 YY°� '`5 rlv. -� ';5- a.,°y ra as o �'7�� ran E.s$� € =`�iu 5$ 3 a oy TE a.5 `n :j �Q `�'- K -v�'5 °�'' °> c rya" Oav o.58 >n voH- g0w v y Q rn o a o °o y v 3 e v e0.$ a s e0 a '3 K p a t' r/' a E' ° ° •2 a y o s n° q o E > n a U .10 0vs '$tea >o G p cn3 cL oa `o o w w wo .° H oo bo° 0�6 i• v o ° r, U o m �w°. °_ a s° s o _ "' U -'- j_ ° I- 'C$w ra a 3 '3v en "m Tm 'ob a ,3. �3 a•� W_ v° °`d•e - o� U "7 ° PP \ W G'�.- .��r�w c vc�_cr -G �u,S�y "> Fa c >0°, ° G �A �` e.d " o�°. E a a c�oo_wr 1.- o oaw �x F. LL V p a « ❑._._ w0 a= 'r3 Q A0, E E °m °i C7€ 3v �3 a. 5n a v v€ p5� .°� ~ in ,w,F- O A `�' -�oa oy .00 o.53y °'1; 3i''o my °v'" o 0o�o.5c a' o �a E�`„ 3 �a E° - �.E .ss3wv Wz ^�ays°vs °w u� U'�'- ''a`o._o av afiu :tip 4p G pa�3 N� .. Tg-• ed >'_ �E "° °:av °o e°, �` oY.eP'E= ay° acv web �v a mo��eom3 a e� Nati+am 3 w L °'rn ov E._ wwo rn 'S va'5 'S Z•za 3 ._5 '`aoo z_q ¢�a'' s¢ ="3'55 „'5 �°¢ �c°¢�c�ri�5 tin°a €w �[�o °r+�.5v °5 €5woc w H 0�i �o ¢ �wc o ¢ a o ° -W .;� .'.. > A 44,a m W yFo+'S3 a Lo., .. Nm a e6 ti 17 • G • Is H x °a wmain¢ o iwwmain¢ r ¢ w a n. a !!:j C r ( ARAbE FOUNDATION CkNEKA- NOTES: �/{ -L�% I/4° = f-d • ALL PY6 FROM FACE OF FRAMN( OR MD POW OF WALL • NEW EARAC-.E PLATE HE ff TO PE a -1 1 15" U4-L% NO ORFRWSE • ALL HEALERS TO 15E (2) 9 114° -W U•LESS NO OTHERWISE • HEADER IEI6FrF W-e AAWVE GARAC£ SlA6 "-6 r------------------- WOO --------- I 77 77 r I I- - -- --- - - - - -- '99oO-- - -- __ - -- - - - -- - -_� I I I 8•• W % 4' d H CONE. WALL p -- W/ 2" Sj p LED(£ ® 9900 n I I I ON 2a° % V" COW- FOOTWI :r r 1 I I I' I L --J I I I I 24" x 24" % 8" I I I I Corte FOOr6W I I I I I I I'I II I I I I e° I 77 -5" 18^ N I� I I IN OARACE SW -9950 I I I .• I I I I I I I I I II I I I I -I II I I I I I I t I L J I t I L - -- ------ - - - - -- [--I ------ - - - - -- -- ------ - - - - -- ---J 2•-Ir 9 -2" T -1U 2' -Ir �9-d• GENERAL NOTES: OARAOE FOUNDATION A-L DM5 FROM FACE OF GONG OR �--4 /4" = rl• M® POW OF WALL %3CE 12�19j 2Oi' Idi' n to ROOFfl.l TO Mm PONF OF ROOF MATCH I-X6T IEW 24x711 wNPOW soFFrr ,� FAS,w - MArGFt IXST v z ❑ ❑❑❑ ❑❑❑❑ ❑ ❑ ❑❑ MATG�Ii IX5T I F 11 11 OARAOE POOR 6A2ACE POOR 6A¢K£ DOGR m - MATCH E%ST - MATG1 E%ST - MAT /.Ft FYST - I 1 I I ------------------------------------------- 0 OARAOE FRONT ELEVATION 1/4. = r-o- sOFFIr ADD FA5Gw - MATCH EXST TO EXIST I I I I r� I `--------------------------------- %51 OARAOE REAR ELEVATION Ir 6, 2 -0 I 1 ,- � I � I I SPIN, r0 MATCH IXISi SOFFIT A!•D � SOFFIT AHD I FASCIA - I MATCH E7(5T FASCIA - MATCH IXST I � I i GARAGE I I I I I I ------------------------------- - - - - -� .. OARAOE SIDE ELEVATIONS OARAOE SECTION �-� 114" = f— -q 1/4 = F-/! � R�8 v l(� X\A o � � O d\\ c �� CV 1L Z ti lv O III I I I . OVERHEAD OAS GARAGE - - - HEATER I do - -_ r -1 O FPRA�M -�A z sTLPS I I I I I I o I I m I I x%108 OVERHfM POOR I I %xm OVEPirm POOR I I % %IOD OVERHEAD POOR - 2• -Ir 9 -2° 2• -1d 9 -2" 2• -Id 9 -2" 2• -Ir 9`r-o• ( ARAbE FOUNDATION CkNEKA- NOTES: �/{ -L�% I/4° = f-d • ALL PY6 FROM FACE OF FRAMN( OR MD POW OF WALL • NEW EARAC-.E PLATE HE ff TO PE a -1 1 15" U4-L% NO ORFRWSE • ALL HEALERS TO 15E (2) 9 114° -W U•LESS NO OTHERWISE • HEADER IEI6FrF W-e AAWVE GARAC£ SlA6 "-6 r------------------- WOO --------- I 77 77 r I I- - -- --- - - - - -- '99oO-- - -- __ - -- - - - -- - -_� I I I 8•• W % 4' d H CONE. WALL p -- W/ 2" Sj p LED(£ ® 9900 n I I I ON 2a° % V" COW- FOOTWI :r r 1 I I I' I L --J I I I I 24" x 24" % 8" I I I I Corte FOOr6W I I I I I I I'I II I I I I e° I 77 -5" 18^ N I� I I IN OARACE SW -9950 I I I .• I I I I I I I I I II I I I I -I II I I I I I I t I L J I t I L - -- ------ - - - - -- [--I ------ - - - - -- -- ------ - - - - -- ---J 2•-Ir 9 -2" T -1U 2' -Ir �9-d• GENERAL NOTES: OARAOE FOUNDATION A-L DM5 FROM FACE OF GONG OR �--4 /4" = rl• M® POW OF WALL %3CE 12�19j 2Oi' Idi' n to ROOFfl.l TO Mm PONF OF ROOF MATCH I-X6T IEW 24x711 wNPOW soFFrr ,� FAS,w - MArGFt IXST v z ❑ ❑❑❑ ❑❑❑❑ ❑ ❑ ❑❑ MATG�Ii IX5T I F 11 11 OARAOE POOR 6A2ACE POOR 6A¢K£ DOGR m - MATCH E%ST - MATG1 E%ST - MAT /.Ft FYST - I 1 I I ------------------------------------------- 0 OARAOE FRONT ELEVATION 1/4. = r-o- sOFFIr ADD FA5Gw - MATCH EXST TO EXIST I I I I r� I `--------------------------------- %51 OARAOE REAR ELEVATION Ir 6, 2 -0 I 1 ,- � I � I I SPIN, r0 MATCH IXISi SOFFIT A!•D � SOFFIT AHD I FASCIA - I MATCH E7(5T FASCIA - MATCH IXST I � I i GARAGE I I I I I I ------------------------------- - - - - -� .. OARAOE SIDE ELEVATIONS OARAOE SECTION �-� 114" = f— -q 1/4 = F-/! � R�8 v l(� X\A o � � O d\\ c �� CV 1L Z ti lv 0 a CD i o CD O 0 A'�•' C'D P CD CD ,.O O rrt CCD yCD CD 'r4 ', d O `a CD n ¢. O O CD C7'� g O CD • CD 0 CD r C7 �+• C O CL '9' � C CD � �o> CD CDCD� CD uq o � � cs CD CD O O A� O R O O C O C CD CD � O y CD a- i c�• O � � O Cr 1-� CD CD 0 y. O C) CD ° CD C CCD CD CD Co CD n O o ° i C H, t CD o CCD �- � n � �- y o C 00 O O CD P� C O CD '_.:': �•'r N it I:a y 0 N -P Vol i O z G� 7� d r My-I O 7z a CD N O ,tea N CD D O CD O n O d O ° e-F J O � A7 O C fD � b A� ow 9 C� �o n N+ n z O CD C CD x K O � O .t A� d b O U4 d CD 0 0 O UQ n O• D ..t O E v Ch TJ N C N .A N .� z p, o� CDC o� a. • A� CD C) O y O� N W FL N O J O x 0 0 0 d y O y n z � CD D O CD O n O d O ° e-F J O � A7 O C fD � b A� ow 9 C� �o n N+ n z O CD C CD x K O � O .t A� d b O U4 d CD 0 0 O UQ n O• D ..t O E v Ch TJ N C N .A N .� z p, o� CDC o� a. • A� CD C) O y O� N W FL N O J O x 0 0 0 d y O Page 2 • a PUD Concept, Development and Final stage plan review • a subdivision (preliminary and final) Some of the above applications may be submitted together. For example: a comprehensive plan amendment, rezoning, site plan and concept /development stage PUD, and preliminary plat could be combined into one application with a final plat /stage PUD to follow. BACKGROUND Context: The lot was created as part of the Meakers Outlots to Excelsior subdivision in 1884 and was further subdivided into two lots by resolution prior to modern record keeping. The property is currently vacant. There are three wetland basins on the property, two on the west side of the site and one on the south side of the property. When the property is subdivided, wetland buffer requirements would apply. The property is not within the 100 -year floodplain, but the southern portion of the site is within the Shoreland Overlay District for Lake Minnewashta. The site contains mature trees and is subject to tree preservation with development. The properties to the north, east and south are developed with single- family homes and the properties to the west are developed with four -unit townhouses (quadraminiums). PROPOSAL The applicant's sketch plans (attached) show 38 townhouses to be clustered along a new street with a cul -de -sac at the end. The townhouse structures would include either four or six dwellings. Each dwelling would include two levels above grade plus habitable attic space above that could be a master suite or another bedroom. Graphics for the units are attached. The applicant indicates that they have constructed similar units in Plymouth and Chanhassen and the sales were brisk. The dwellings would sell for under $400,000 each and the homeowner's association would maintain the site. In other developments where they have built this townhouse, the applicant states that common maintenance and lower price point appeals to empty nesters, singles, and young married couples. A dwelling of $300,000 - $400,000 does not meet the regional definition of affordable housing, but it does fill a niche that is lacking in Shorewood where most newly constructed homes are between $800,000 to $1,200,000. Land Use /Density: The applicant proposes a development with 5.35 units per gross acre of land based on the R -313 zoning district. Although this level of density is higher than typically proposed in Shorewood, the location appears to be able to accommodate the increased density with minimal impact on the remainder of the community. The site has access to municipal water and sewer, and convenient access to Highway 7. Additionally, much of the stormwater flows south, away from areas with poorly draining stormwater areas to the west and north of the property. The Metropolitan Council allows acreage in wetlands, wetland buffers, and some additional areas to be removed from the density calculations, so the site density would be greater than 5.35 units per acre when the applicant submits the detailed square footage information. This is a departure from previous density calculations where the city only removed some of the wetlands and not the buffers from the calculations. Using the previous procedure would remove solely Wetland 1 from the calculations. This would result in a higher density calculation. The higher density allows the city to be consistent with the Metropolitan Council's goal to have suburban communities plan for forecasted population and household growth by having an overall density of greater than five units per acre in new developments, Page 3 but to choose the sites that would be appropriate for the increased density. This same density calculation is used by most communities to remain in compliance with the Metropolitan Council goals. Setbacks: The applicant is requesting reduced setbacks from the front property line and side property lines abutting other streets to accommodate their clustered units on the north side of the property. Especially at pinch points between the wetlands and the public street. Their proposal is shown in the following table. The 15 -foot front setback combined with the distance between the front property line and the curb /street (about 11 feet) would accommodate vehicle parking on the driveway. Some of the buildings could meet a greater setback, which could break up the views of rows of home from Eureka Rd. and Seamans Dr., but may increase in tree removal. Other buildings, such as buildings 13 -21 and 33, could not meet the greater front setback. Traffic: Although the access point to Highway 7 is conveniently located, traffic backups do occur in morning and evening peak hours. Similarly, morning and evening backups occur at Smithtown Road. Consequently, staff recommends the applicant submit a traffic study (completed through the City's Traffic Engineer) including those two intersections with any application for a comprehensive plan amendment. Streets /Public Rights -of -Wax: The applicant would be required to dedicate the new street right -of -way and build the new street to city standard as part of their application. The required right of way is 50 feet for the street with a 50 -foot radius for the cul -de -sac. Staff also recommends requiring the applicant to dedicate additional right -of -way for the adjacent Eureka Road and Seamans Drive so that the City has the right -of -way needed for future road reconstruction projects. The required amount of right -of -way is 50 feet for each street. The amount of right -of -way the applicant would need to dedicate would vary along the corridor due to the varying widths of the existing right -of -way. The applicant shows a 28 -foot side street which would allow for a few guest cars to park on the street to accommodate future parties and other events in addition to the four parking spaces provided per dwelling (including the garage and driveway). Staff recommends the applicant includes conditions in their homeowners association documents that requires the garages required to be used for parking of at least one vehicle (rather than used exclusively for storage) and no recreational vehicles, including trailers, boats, RVs, etc. be stored in the garages or the development due to the reduced setbacks. Wetlands: The Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) has reviewed a wetland delineation and has identified three wetland basins, including the two shown and one additional on the west side of the site near the proposed street. The applicant would need to accommodate the third wetland or identify wetland impact into revised plans. The buffers and setbacks on the two wetlands are shown conceptually consistent with City Code, although one patio /deck would need to be revised as it's located within the standard 15 -foot setback. Stormu,ater: The applicant has proposed to include stormwater treatment for their development and space and easement for a future street project for Seamans Dr. The water table is high in this area and Page 4 for that reason, the applicant has not proposed basements. The site generally flows south toward Lake Minnewashta through a culvert under St. Hwy 7. Full details on the stoirmwater plan must be provided with any formal application and the applicant's proposal must be consistent with City, MnDOT and MCWD regulations. The MCWD has reviewed the concept and given the applicant preliminary comments. Tree Preservation: The site is subject to tree preservation. Staff recommends completing a tree inventory and identifying the best trees on the site and working around them where possible. The City's tree preservation regulations and policy would apply. POTENTIAL COMMENTS: Staff (including staff from the MCWD and the fire department) propose the following comments. Those based on sztbjective standards show both positive and negative options. The Planning Commission may add to, remove, or amend them. 1. The density shown appears (or does not appear) to be acceptable based on the location, layout, existing government services, and complicating factors such as the high water table, wetlands, etc. 2. The setback flexibility needed for the clustered development seems (does not seem) like an acceptable trade for the amount of open space provided and the type of unit and price point offered. 3. The applicant should provide a traffic study (through the City's Engineer) for the proposed development with the comprehensive plan amendment. 4. Right -of -way dedication should occur consistent with City Code for the new and adjacent city streets. 5. Increase the radius of the cul -de -sac pavement to 45.5 feet. 6. The watermain should be extended to the north and south extent of the right -of -way along Seamans Dr. to allow for further extension in the future. 7. Work with the MCWD regarding any wetland impacts. 8. Work with the City and MCWD for stormwater treatment and provide a plan consistent with the requirements. 9. Impervious surfaces on private property shall be limited to 33 percent for all portions of the property outside the shoreland district and 25 percent within the shoreland district 10. Add language into the HOA documents that restrict the use of garages to require a minimum of one car to be parked within the garage and prohibit parking of recreational vehicles in the development or in the garage. The HOA shall also be responsible for protecting the wetland buffers from encroachments. 11. Provide a tree inventory (consistent with City Code and policies) with any application submitted. Work to protect the best trees on the site where possible. 12. Consider increasing the number of trees above those required to provide additional trees between the two existing homes to the north and the proposed townhouses. 13. Amend the shoreland district to accommodate a channel that lies below the OHWL on the north side of Minnewashta Lake. 14. All townhouse structures would be required to be protected by 13R suppression systems and hydrants would be required to be located as directed by the fire inspector. Page 5 ATTACHMENTS Location map Applicant's narrative and plans S:IPlam ml;\Phrtmmg Files\Appli.mmsl2019 CasesWeathouse Villas POLTE CPA Pre- App\PC memo 02 03 19 2.dacc athou a Village" APPLICATION FOR: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT PRE - APPLICATION SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA December 18, 2018 Introduction Pulte Homes of Minnesota, LLC ( "Pulte ") is pleased to be submitting this application. Pulte's company vision is "Building Consumer Inspired Homes and Communities to Make Lives Better'. We currently operate under three distinct brands of homebuilding throughout the country: Pulte Homes, Centex Homes, and Del Webb. Pulte's Minnesota Division has an office in Eden Prairie and will sell over 500 homes in the Twin Cities this year, all under the Pulte Homes brand. Pulte will act as both developer of the property and builder of the homes. The primary contact for Pulte is: Paul Heuer, Director of Land Planning & Entitlement 7500 Flying Cloud Drive, Suite 670 Eden Prairie, MN 55344 952 - 229 -0722 Paul.Heuer@PulteGroup.com The owner of the property is: Olivia K. Anderson Trust 322 Lake Street, Apartment 201 Excelsior, MN 55331 The Property Legal Description: COM AT SW COR OF N 2 ACRES OF LOT 26 TH E TO SE COR THEREOF TH S TO N LINE OF HWY TH W ALONG SAID HWY LINE TO A PT 210 FT ELY We Qoild Consun '-)er Inspired Homes oil Commoniiies to Make Lives k el ler a � 11 34- 117 -23 -33 -0017 No address. Key Facts • Area = 7.1 acres • Existing zoning is R -1A • Comprehensive Plan indicates Minimum Density Residential 0 7.1 acres x 1.0 maximum units /acre = 7 homes 0 0 acres preserved open space • Proposed zoning is Medium Density Residential 0 38 attached townhomes with homeowner's association maintenance 0 3.3 acres preserved open space (47 %) • Comprehensive Plan Amendment would result in adding 31 homes and 3.3 acres of preserved open space • Gross density = 5.35 units /acre • Public utilities and streets • Setbacks and dimensions • 15 -foot setback to fronts • 30 -foot setback to rears • 25 -foot setback to Seaman's and Eureka • 15 -foot setback to wetland buffers • 20 -foot building separation Neighborhood Vision As an infill property, the surrounding area has a history. Most of the surrounding area was developed and built upon some time ago. This results in specific demographic patterns and housing gaps (needs). The City's 2009 Comprehensive Plan clearly describes these housing needs on page LU -1: "Current residential development in Shorewood consists mainly of single family units. Few new housing units are available to young singles, newly married couples or the elderly." Our vision with this application is to directly address the most pressing housing needs of the City. We are proposing to create a small neighborhood of attractive townhomes on a property that is appropriate for such use. We believe that this type of housing is exactly what many of your residents are searching for and are unable to find in the City. We concluded that this is the right use for this property for the following reasons: 1. Serves Pressing Need — This two -story townhome is very popular among singles, young couples, and empty nesters. This new home design has become very popular in the Twin Cities area. It is relatively affordable for singles, 2 divorced, and young couples. The homeowners association - maintained yards, snow removal, and exterior of the buildings have been very attractive to empty nesters. We are finding that about 30% of our buyers of this townhome are empty nesters. Given the existing demographics of this area, we would not be surprised to see a higher percentage here. The range of buyer demographics attracted to this townhome design means that we will be able to keep a variety of existing Shorewood residents in your City. This home design is also very flexible, allowing for two master suites or adding a habitable attic area. This flexibility in design leads to a range of floor plans and price points. 2. Property Challenges — It is our understanding that this area has high groundwater. The ideal residential use in high groundwater areas is slab on grade construction with no basements. That is consistent with the design of townhomes. Our use of slab on grade construction will result in the avoidance of basement groundwater issues. Another property challenge is that it contains two wetlands. The southern wetland poses complications in developing the property with single family homes. The property is best suited for townhomes. 3. Cluster Development — Our site plan demonstrates a "cluster development" approach. This means that we clustered the homes in one area, thereby allowing us to preserve existing land to the south (47% of the total land!). This works well because the open space will provide a buffer between the homes and the busy traffic on State Highway 7. This open space area is lightly to moderately wooded. Although some trees will need to be removed for storm water ponding, we anticipate preserving a large area of existing trees. This type of design approach on a wooded site conveys a general feeling of beauty and spaciousness. Due to the woods, wetlands, and proximity to State Highway 7, this property is an ideal candidate for a cluster development. It will also generate significant higher tax revenue than a single family or villa development. 4. Homeowners Association (HOA) — Homeowners associations rely on economies of scale. Enough homes are needed to keep the association dues at a reasonable level. Too few homes results in high costs due to the many fixed costs associated with HOA's such as accounting, insurance, management fees, etc. This 38 -home neighborhood is just large enough to support an HOA neighborhood. Less homes would not be supportive of the very HOA maintenance that many buyers are seeking. The Concept Plan We have carefully studied the market, the City's Comprehensive Plan, the property, and the surrounding uses and have worked diligently to create a concept plan that is ideally suited for this property. We are very pleased with how our vision and the resulting plan have come together. Below is a description of the various strategies and components involved in creating the plan. 3 IM CL N BCD 0CL 07 :3 Cho: x CD -h ° o n� -* cn cp C7 cn o < Q o p ° -. Q v CD :3 mm °upim (no N 0�( s3 m N Q v =" Q- m o 3 O CD p0 � 0 0 0 5. m 0 .-� m = Q 0- m 0 0 M < °m cn �, p ° 0 3 Q. c O �, �'L53m� cQ p can �m omo �(Q u CD CD CD 0 (QXV fD�� -0�,0�sr- CD M 5,(Q CD CD CD =r � s 0 ~' s0 = mom (gym X ^ ,� Q m(n O n' -, 0 2) (n � m CD N .-. m (n (Q m n° CD O � m c n' O ° -�+ (n :3 0 n -� CND --nn Sv C2 CD cQ X, CD m m m 3 m< m om. CD m p m`�Q_cn 3 CD (a CD 3- O QCp(Q O CL CD �Q. =v O -0 O zs0 Q-0 m� � N n n m cn O CD CD O �. CD( m CD O O M M O :3 CD 2 0 O Q CD a< CD m ^' Q- x N �, h 0+ �- (sp CD CD -0 -� O� v �_- �< m m m 3 min — Cl) °� 0 .. ° � Q ninm�'�v 3cn-0 0 CD m�< � p �_ O CCD D cn ^' CD M - N O (Q = �� p -0 (n .-F 0- . t � m � � (Q n w � m CD `< _ �s�r -- � CD mON CD _ O 3� °�3 v ��� CD w CD cn o� < o o m m a Q 0 CD O cn cn < l< m m CD O H O �_ O cn Q m Q cn 07 N < (n Sv �vtZn 3 0 m (nom (n cn3< m m pCDn O m p- (QCDm ° cn cn - n m-0 5- 0 c cn m m o m ,� CD 0 M CD Cr o O m m O O '� m O �-0 � N 0- m O N v C - G v CD CD 0 � cD -0 �' CQ CD (pn p = 0 ° cn N co m =3 0 � cn Cr m m v m cn v O 00 3 cQ' Q CD v cn 3 ° 0 _0 cn ?U' 3 m -0 o Q �`< m O O 3� v �m 3 v p�'n =T CD 0 C� p o p O -� (Q CD Q - CD CD �Q =, v `< m CC CD cn cc m N (n m —(a COD 0 N CL N S- —{ — -0 =� = v * CD O C) 70 -00 O 0 Q_ 'D � p CA � � C7 n � � cn � � = n � p 'n �CD ��CD�- -as0� O ������c°n� —� c'ni n� �c�'nm�m - °O =� �� '_�� CD °��'�v cncp�0Q' cc'm m3 �m CD NO�cQ�mcp� .m. CD ^" O CD Q CD CQ =r to CD n `< CD O CD =r -a tD N cn CD 3 cD =r N cn O m O x �" Cr ' ° . O m O < O .� CD �, Al CD D Q � CD 0 rn O Q O ,� N CD� O O O fD �9 � O O Q n Q Q_ ~ CQ tii = , m ° •-� cQ V+ CD CL ° (D �. m O m fn `< CD „ = cn O < CD O _ � (n O 3 O '. cn CD -a O O W rt O� is n O Q cs �• CCDD v ° v 5 o ° v' �' v � -0 00 v' 0 3 cn CD ° `< r, �• �, `� w m � 3 CQ �- co O 0-0 O p CD CD Q O Q- Q � m fD O" "O CD m r-+, Al "O O CQ CD 0 O N O CD Q_O Q O- -CD w O : °� O O v N m CD_ n to `_� n� O O O_ %- O — CD ? O c< O � co CD SU O ° p 1 o Q. =- w cn cn 3 -O � m Q_ CD O ¢� CD �. cn O Q cQ m O v m 0 W CD O O Q n n- `� CD v v m m `� -1 a x- y 0 '� O _ O m cn � cn —, o cQ Cl) :5. ��= °3� =�3m-° ��om �+- CDSVS � C. CO �- cn cn 0- < tv cmn vii (n CD v = CD =r 0 � — 3 < �' a-�m U) CD �'QCQ o (D -0 m� —o cn��n �c�m :3 CD .-r ^" iii O O Q_ (D Q_ •� IV O C -�, Q CCDD m < m -�' CD N n CvUi N Q_ p �. _► Z. O `< m CD O' O Sv O CD (D Q N CCDD 3 C m cp "O s a c O m— cQ ai � N N CD CD� CD cn CD �. v v 0 Q O O w m CD CQ 0= cn CD cn CD -mi, co W — Q n - CD 3 cD co n n' O N �' N O �G o N Sv m Cn m N CD m ogm� m�cn m� sv�^� " -0 �m _ _ cQ = � Q• O Q_ 5 CD -0 CD iv Cn Q CD �. .-. v m ° =" < n_ = � W CD O- ° O w p CD to m N u° CD .. CD Fq, �. cn ;::p m CD cn Cp << CD _ CQ CD ER 5 (D -� ° m O ° Q n s v x CD m O O "a m 0 CAD 3° (n cQ 0 cQ Q O m 0 Q 87 r W (D O cn < (Q 0 Q N a' , , ° -n moon mo°- 3 ° v 9) 0 - h ° Q _ • G m r0 �y a CD v m D -S -z O n N ° sv 0 -0 - ao CD C m-0 (a v c n� o .. .� CD (D QO Z CD z v I O O C- Fn WW C V O 0 O O O v CD @ O O N N o CD CD 2) •-"� O CO =r (n n O' O � SQ) �'�� C) C) CL C/) w < O =3 CD �ooa°, M �' -0 (D 4 (0 W CO (D O m m D < CD n j - to Z CD �- (, °- -w v — �' Cp v °mam aim- v ��ocWnoCDw3 oQ cm �3 "RC. 3cmn- a° <�CD - m v z O N �. -. m G (Q n O O" - m CCDD CD 3 m < CD o o -I oc°Q 1'i m :r ° — :- � p w 0 a v n =r CL ° CD CD m 0 � r ° m 0- �uo o C Q � °- o � CD ° m C C: CD ° Q �a CD ��v� m 0 v w n O w m 3 v =mQ3-0 -.ca vo= �cMn�'mcmn -0 p Q-0CDM CD m 0* n v m m v G�-0 � �w z o c QC,'o m ° - _ cn cD 3 0 -o cmn� o CD cn ° -0 CD 3 ° CL cn � °o O o m 3.='c m o W Q CL CL o U) O (Q 0 :3 CD p O- =r v CD p (n 3 =r - m CL 3 CD 0 � sU (n o (n m O� ca 0- O 3 3 0--Isv CD 0 CD CD = CD n p CD D0 3v v�oCD 0 CD CD Q�rt a; p o CD (p p CCD cn 0 O o ��• � m CCD o'er � � �, O cn =r o CD O -o o m 3 °� m = m CD ( v o (Q ° 5 (D -� ° m O ° Q n s v x CD m 0 CAD 3° (n cQ 0 cQ Q O m 0 Q �l Zl r W (D O cn < (Q 0 Q N a' , , ° -n moon mo°- o- a�0 -Eq —( 9) 0 - h Q. � 0 O O • G O m n N- O 'O p m D -S -z O n 0 -0 - ao CD C m-0 (a (n 3 (Q U< Cp ) �fl ° % CD p ' p O � W ) CD c WW C o B° ;70 wcCDCc n CD so � � -0 n C) OL M cn �'�� �' �m o-= a) . � 3,< ° -a cn �ooa°, (° o m<< m < =: r O m m D < CD cn CD CD a °O v = m m o cn � <� -0< OZ °- o �m m c cQ3 CD tf, O o= O Q aim- ��ocWnoCDw3 cm O 3cmn- a° <�CD - O CD O i11 O N �. -. m G (Q n O O" - m v " � Q oc°Q 1'i O CD Cn ��m -�m� :. o � p w O ai 0-0 ° m CD m n =r CL -1 .-e O CD p .�� Q O' m 0- O << —.0 o cn °- o � CD ° m C C: ° ° Q m 0 v w n O w m 3 vo= �cMn�'mcmn -0 p cn p m CD W (� m v m m v G�-0 � �w o c QC,'o m (CD m m `n cn cD 3 0 -o cmn� o CD cn ° cn o m m Example Photos of Elevations ��• Example Photos of Elevations ^ Ito - -- _ MEN:,- 1 -�:N Example Photos of Elevations ]1,1, 1te Rainier Floor plans, Elevations and Options will vary front Communihj 112tto Communihj and may not reflect current changes. Dimensions shown are approximate. EQUAL HOUSING Copyright © 2016 Pulte Homes, Inc. OPPORTUNITY 2407. 902 - Rainier- (FL- GE- KC) -MN- Base- BROC.dzvg - BRO COVER 2407,902 - Rainier -MN- Base -24' (2 Stonj) Unit- 06152016 First Floor 9' -0" Ceiling Floor plans, Elevations and Options will vary from Communihj 1121, to Communihj and may not reflect current changes. Dimensions shown are approximate. " EQUAL HOUSING Copyright 2016 Pulte Homes, Inc. J)t�® OPPORTUNITY 2407, 902 - Rainier- (FL- GE- KC) -MN- Base- BROC.dwg - 6- FL1 -N -L 2407.902- Raanier -MN- Base -24' (2 Story) Unit- 06152016 I BEDROOM ,3 I I BEDROOM 2 10' -2" x 10' -11" 1 10' -1" x 11' -6" WIC tL z w u x h 0 O SITTING 5' -3" x 6' -5" I BATH 2 OPT, li OPT.; L OWNER'S BATH OWNER'S SUITE 12' -9" x 13' -10" OPT TRAY CLG L------------ Second Floor 8' -0" Ceiling (Opt. 9' -0" Ceiling) Floor plans, Elevations and Options will vanj f om Communihj to Communihj and map not reflect current changes. Dimensions shown are approximate. } im EQUAL HOUSING Copyright © 2016 Pulte Homes, Inc. OPPORTUNITY 2407, 902 - Rainier- (FL- GE- KC) -MN- Base- BROC.dzog - 6- FL2 -N -L _ 2407.902 - Rainier -MN- Base -24' (2 Story) Unit- 06152016 — — — — — — — — — — il li I I I I I I I p I I Habitable Attic w/ Bedroom 51 Bath 4 Option 8' -0" Ceiling Floor plans, Elevations and Options will vanj fronn Communihj 112rto Conununihj and map not reflect current changes. Dimensions shown are approximate. EQUAL HOUSING Copyright © 2016 Pulte Homes, Inc. PC oavunruxirr 2407. 902 - Rainier- (FL- GE- KC) -MN- Base- BROC.dzvg - 6- OPHA20 -N -L l 2407.902 - Rainier -MN- Base -24' (2 Stonj) Unit- 06152016 F REAR TERRACE 19'-8" x 10'-0" Sliding Glass Door Option ------------- Be .•- •. • Powder Room 3 Option Habitable Attic w/ Rear Terrace Option 8'-0" Ceiling Floor plans, Elevations and Options zoill vary from Communihj 112t to Conuniniffij and may not reflect current changes. Dimensions shown are approximate. EQUAL HOUSING Copyright 0 2016 Pulte Homes, Inc, OPPORTUNITY 2407.902-Rainier-(FL-GE-KC)-MN-Base-BROC.dzog - 6-OPHA30-N-L 2407.902-Rainier-MN-Base-24' (2 Story) Unit-06152016 Denali Floor plaits, Elevations and Options will vary front Community 12tto Community and may not reflect current changes. Dimensions shown are approximate. EQUAL HOUSING Copyright © 2016 Pulte Homes, Inc. OPPORTUNITY 2467. 902 - Denali- (FL- GE- KC) -MN- Base- BROC.dzvg - BRO COVER 2467.902 - Denali -MN- Base -24' (2 Story) Unit- 06152016 I i I OPT PATIO 8' -8" x10' -0" I IT GATHERING ROOM 12' -10" x 17' -3" CAFE 10'-2"x11'-5" I n II / Y. 0 a- (. KITCHEN . FOYER PR 2 CAR GARAGE 18' -3" x 19' -7" DN P First Floor 9' -0" Ceiling Floor plans, Elevations and Options will vary from Communihj 112rto Communihj and may not reflect current changes. Dimensions shown are approximate. EQUAL HOUSING Copyright © 2016 Pulte Homes, Inc.��;•) OPPORTUNITY 2467. 902 - Denali- (FL- GE- KC) -MN- Base- BROC.dzag - 6- FL1 -N -L 2467,902-Denali-MN-Base-24' (2 Story) Unit- 06152016 I I OWNER'S BATH WIC LAUN�/ OPT ;I OPT OPT UPPER CABS ' BEDROOM 3 11' -3" x 10' -0" WIC OWNER'S SUITE 13' -5" x 14' -7" OPT TRAY CLG L WIC i (311 TH 2 OPT BEDROOM 2 11' -3" x 11' -5" ------------ Second Floor 8' -0" Ceiling (Opt. 9' -0" Ceiling) Floor plans, Elevations and Options will vary from Communihj 112r to Communihj and may not reflect current changes. Dimensions shown are approximate. p" EQUAL IN Copyright ©2016 Pulte Homes, Inc. �a OPPORTUNITY 2467, 902 - Denali- (FL- GE- KC) -MN- Base- BROC.dzvg - 6- FL2 -N -L 2467.902- Denali -MN- Base -24' (2 Story) Unit- 06152016 Owner's Bath 1 Option at Rear House Extension WIC BATH OWNER'S SUITE 18' -0" x 14' -8" OPT TRAY CLG Rear House Extension Option Second Floor Options 8' -0" Ceiling (Opt. 9'-0" Ceiling) Floor plans, Elevations and Options will vary from Communitj 112t to Community and may not reflect current changes. Dimensions shown are approximate. PGURL HOUSING Copyright © 2016 Pulte Homes, Inc. OPPORTUMIry 2467. 902 - Denali- (FL- GE- KC) -MN- Base- BROC.dzog - 6- OP21 -N -L 2467.902 - Denali -MN- Base -24' (2 Story) Unit- 06152016 I� I� I� Be�erage Option Powder Room 3 Option — — — — — — — — — — 'I I' I I Habitable Attic Option 8' -0" Ceiling Floor plans, Elevations and Options will vary from Conmtunihj to Communihj and may not reflect current changes, Dimensions shown are approximate. �} EQUAL HOUSING Copyright © 2016 Pulte Homes, Inc. OPPORTUNITY 2467, 902 - Denali- (FL- GE- KC) -MN- Base- BROC.dzvg - 6- OPHA10 -N -L 2467.902 - Denali -MN- Base -24' (2 Story) Unit- 06152016 I I I Habitable Attic Option 8' -0" Ceiling Floor plans, Elevations and Options will vary from Conmtunihj to Communihj and may not reflect current changes, Dimensions shown are approximate. �} EQUAL HOUSING Copyright © 2016 Pulte Homes, Inc. OPPORTUNITY 2467, 902 - Denali- (FL- GE- KC) -MN- Base- BROC.dzvg - 6- OPHA10 -N -L 2467.902 - Denali -MN- Base -24' (2 Story) Unit- 06152016 l7� tai `O O 2 00 v C U) m z m r cn r 0> > I C) rn n O Z n rn a z--)N— 0 n o > D m � m ro N 01 N m Z O m o D 1 �JZ i O 1 2 N N m w mmm m ca co 0 to m CD C) ° ° 3 ID 6 KZD 3 � m A (/) N D O 0 r o o 11 m - m N o so o= zz "s z z O m o Di y m °NO�o m °oN m Z c m o 9 r z Z r3� .. O CA Z Z m m a~ °v 9°n m < g -� arm � D v z � OZ ~ o. m � ^' Z Z O 9 C n < a D x s; m v M - o c y z -M m D g Z C) N O Z n O -0 o 0 D o I ^� m n 0,- OD ° O S�T1 m '71 Ci' [1yy1 (n = m o Z O � m r.2 n m 21s N m o m m m O �° C O Lo m ��ma0 2 (DU o6mwmo o y � —H � o m m z ao; D yO x c ° yy m om D O y ° Z M. A C � D O a O Z m m9 X00 3 n m < f � 6y %o �D y0 o i m -M °zm � r 3 18 — 9:03cm L oy cn om 9 mo mo - m N o so o= zz m D m z o y m � s =r y� �- m 3 on rm v mm o Tz A 3 0 A om - mz N� m �m zn o Drawing name: P: \Alliant \Pulte \Shorewoo_d_— Anderson Property \Boathouse Concept Plon.dwq Dec 18, 2018 — 11:25am � a Ca u�. f O C � 9m Cnv - - -- Z rn r: U) r z u z v �? s s E� 4 • O u • _ t l 1 ;J IF `woo p t� 1� 1'€ rN d > D fn m m m Z o 0 v v v 0 0 o zj °° v o o o a m "s s g g° u7 v v a v o 0 0 o 0 0 o °o v o 0 a o � o g 9 0 0 o <oZ o m o 0 o c m o o o n o f m° gym; m ? Z D z E3 z z zm ° ay 1 z o n s i o D y NO a > ° ° ➢ >°> m y w 9 y f 2 9< 0 ➢ n Y o o D A D �' c m o n o? > z x n m- o ° F z a l N o r 6 n - - n 8 `� y z o n z ➢ o ➢ m Z r a _N y Z ° 9 z `w ? ➢ Z z ��� ° mm W 09 O N N W J m o -n Cl) Q g .wm° m F. W W O= a = 17f m tom � co o m O .C1 / P`�1' < m ° o ; Z D � at D C C C3 M lo n 3 Z A O O-c NCD O Im O O