Loading...
09-17-19 Planning Commission Meeting CITY OF SHOREWOOD COUNCIL CHAMBERS PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD TUESDAY SEPTEMBER 17, 2019 7:00 P.M. A G E N D A CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL / (LIAISON) SCHEDULE RIEDEL (Oct) ______ MADDY (Nov) ______ GORHAM (Dec) ______ EGGENBERGER (tbd) ______ GAULT (Sep) ______ 1. APPROVAL OF AGENDA 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES August 6, 2019  3. PUBLIC HEARINGS A) None 4. OTHER BUSINESS A) VARIANCE TO FRONT YARD AND BLUFF SETBACKS Applicant: Refined Remodeling, Inc. Location: 5875 Ridge Road B) RESCHEDULE NOVEMBER 5 MEETING 5. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR 6. REPORTS Council Meeting Report  Draft next meeting agenda  7. ADJOURNMENT CITY OF SHOREWOOD COUNCIL CHAMBERS PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD TUESDAY, AUGUST 6, 2019 7:00 P.M. MINUTES CALL TO ORDER Chair Maddy called the meeting to order at 7:01 P.M. ROLL CALL Present: Chair Maddy; Commissioners Eggenberger, Gault and Riedel; Planning Director Darling; and, Council Liaison Siakel Absent: Commissioner Gorham 1. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Chair Maddy asked for there to be an item added to the agenda to update the liaison schedule for reporting to the Council. Planning Director Darling stated that it will be added under Other Business. Riedel moved, Eggenberger seconded, approving the agenda for August 6, 2019, as amended. Motion passed 4/0. 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES  July 2, 2019 Gault moved, Maddy seconded, approving the Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of July 2, 2019, as presented. Motion passed 2/0/2 (Riedel and Eggenberger abstained). 3. PUBLIC HEARINGS Chair Maddy explained the Planning Commission is comprised of residents of the City of Shorewood who are serving as volunteers on the Commission. The Commissioners are appointed by the City Council. The Commission’s role is to help the City Council in determining zoning and planning issues. One of the Commission’s responsibilities is to hold public hearings and to help develop the factual record for an application and to make a non-binding recommendation to the City Council. The recommendation is advisory only. A. PUBLIC HEARING – ZONING CODE TEXT AMENDMENTS REMOVING BONDS AS PERFORMANCE GUARANTEES Chair Maddy opened the Public Hearing at 7:04 P.M. noting the procedures used in a Public Hearing. CITY OF SHOREWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING August 6, 2019 Page 2 of 6 Planning Director Darling explained that this is a draft ordinance that removes bonds as an acceptable financial guarantee for developers with performance agreements or development contracts. She stated that bonds have become very difficult to seize when developers fail to perform so the City is looking for cash deposits or letters of credit which are much easier to use when needed. She noted that these proposed changes are simply housekeeping and proactive, rather than a reaction to a particular incident with a developer. Staff is recommending approval of this amendment. She explained that staff is recommending this same change over a number of sections of city code, but the Planning Commission must review changes to the Zoning Code text. Commissioner Eggenberger asked why a developer would want to use a bond rather than the cash or letter of credit. Planning Director Darling stated that bond are cheaper alternatives than the other options. Commissioner Eggenberger asked when the proposed change would take effect and if the developers would be given warning ahead of time of the deadline. Planning Director Darling stated that staff has already been using mostly letters of credit and cash deposits with developers. Commissioner Gault asked about the dollar amount guidelines in the City Code because some of them don’t say anything. He suggested that every instance be given an amount because there is inconsistency in the language throughout the Code. Planning Director Darling stated that this guarantee is for all the outstanding improvements and there is a requirement that their engineer give the City a list of all the outstanding improvements with a dollar amount attached to each item. She stated that then the City Engineer will look it over and make sure it is consistent with the proposed improvements. Commissioner Gault reiterated that he would like the language to be consistent and feels that will also make the Code more enforceable. He stated that he also thinks this would give more flexibility to the City to ask for more money if the condition is warranted. Commissioner Eggenberger suggested more generic language such as “in an amount to be determined by the City” so there isn’t a problem with numbers being too low or too high. The Commission discussed removing self-storage facilities from this section. Chair Maddy opened the Public Testimony portion of the Public Hearing at 7:17 P.M. There being no public testimony, Chair Maddy closed the Public Hearing at 7:17 PM. Riedel moved, Eggenberger seconded, recommending approval of ORDINANCE 569, “An Ordinance Approving an Amendment to Chapters 90, 1201 and 1202 of City Code to Remove Bonds as an Acceptable Financial Guarantee, AND removing the Self-Storage facility provision because it is redundant; cleaning up the language to remove dollar amounts; add language that more clearly reflects that the amount will be determined by the City; and that the word “Bond” be replaced by “Performance Guarantees”. Motion passed 4/0. CITY OF SHOREWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING August 6, 2019 Page 3 of 6 4. OTHER BUSINESS A. VARIANCE TO BUILD ON A SUBSTANDARD LOT AND SETBACK VARIANCE Appellants: Mike and Jane Schlangen Location: 27120 Edgewood Road Planning Commissioner Darling stated that the applicant is proposing to demolish the existing home, detached garage and shed and construct a new home with an attached garage. She explained that the new home would be three feet, three inches from the east property line, five feet from the west property line and the side-yard setback would be eight feet, three inches. She stated that the applicants are proposing that their mechanical equipment would be located along the west property line as well as a sidewalk that could connect their deck to the street side of the house. She reviewed the existing setback requirements and noted that the applicant has stated that the proposed plans would reduce the impervious surface on the property. Staff has reviewed this request and found that practical difficulties exist because of the size and shape of the lot. She explained that the applicant could not construct a home that would meet the required setbacks. She stated that with the conditions listed in the staff report as well as some additional information the engineers have requested, staff is recommending approval. Commissioner Riedel asked about easements for public utilities. Planning Director Darling stated that there were none granted when this property was subdivided. She explained that the property was originally created in 1881 and then further subdivided later to create this parcel as well as a few others in the neighborhood. Commissioner Gault asked about the drainage flow because it looks like it will drain into the adjacent property. Planning Director Darling stated that is the existing condition and they are trying to allow the water to continue flowing along its natural path. She stated that is one of the things that the City Engineer would like more information regarding to ensure that the culverts are adequately sized. Chair Maddy noted that Edgewood Road cuts across their property and asked how that works. Planning Director Darling stated that the road was constructed after the property was platted so it is called a prescriptive right-of-way which means that the public continues to have rights to cross the property. Dan Buerman, DCB Designs, noted that the existing building was used as a seasonal cabin by the applicants. He explained that they have recently retired and are now looking to update the home. He stated that the original plan was to reuse the existing structure but because of an incident where the pipes burst, there was substantial mold, so a decision was made to construct a completely new home. He noted that the applicant has 16 siblings, so the home is proposed to have room for visitors but is still fairly modest. He stated that the existing water flow is a natural flow and he does not think there are any existing culverts in place. He stated that he expects the flow to remain the same with the proposed plans. Susie O’Donnell 27100 Edgewood Road, stated that she and her husband have lived on the property next door to this one for 25 years. She stated that they like the neighbors and are hopeful that they can build a nice house on their lot. She stated that their lot is almost identical to the applicants. She described the size of the home proposed in comparison to their home. CITY OF SHOREWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING August 6, 2019 Page 4 of 6 She stated that if this home is built as proposed they will lose light as well as a view of the lagoon. She stated that their patio that looks out to the lake will come very close to the new two-story home that is proposed and will also lose quite a bit of late afternoon sun because of the height of the home. She reviewed other areas where her home will be affected by this home and noted that it was not the proximity of the home that concerns them, but that it will be two- stories high. She stated that they also believe that there will be a problem with drainage especially with the increased elevation of the paver driveway. Commissioner Riedel stated that the drainage issue may be taken care of with the culverts. Ms. O’Donnell stated that they also have concerns because they wanted to add living space to their home in 2003 and applied for variances with the City. She stated that they had the support of the previous owners of this home for their plans and the City denied their request. She stated that they do want the applicants to get a new home, but they are concerned about the impact on their view and drainage. She stated that they are also concerned with fairness because their proposed plans were much more modest than what is being proposed for this property. She reiterated that they would like the applicants to build a nice, new house, but they have concerns about the proposed plans. Chair Maddy stated that the City cannot dictate views or how they will change as long as there is access to light and air. He stated that staff has already expressed concerns about the drainage, so that will be addressed moving forward. Planning Director Darling stated that she believes the City Engineer was looking at the possibility of using sheet flow across the driveway rather than using culverts so the drainage would not be concentrated and would follow the same natural path towards the lagoon. She stated that she did not believe the driveway grade will be raised based on the information the City has received thus far. She noted that the City will need to see more detailed drainage plans. Ms. O’Donnell stated that the paver driveway elevation says it is at 935 feet and there are areas to the east of the driveway that are about 932 feet. She stated that she assumed that meant that they would build up the driveway to the street level. Mr. Buerman explained the existing grade and the proposed plans. He stated that they were planning for a very shallow culvert, but has gotten the impression that it may not be needed because they may be able to use a six-inch drain tile and sheet flow over the driveway. Chair Maddy asked for more information about the pervious pavers. Mr. Buerman explained that it is 40% pervious. He noted that grass or gravel would be placed between the pavers and within the openings. Commissioner Riedel stated that the pervious pavers are controversial because they require a lot of maintenance so they remain pervious. Mr. Buerman stated that the homeowners understand that they require maintenance and would rather have it paved, but the hardcover situation was critical on the property so they chose the pervious pavers. Commissioner Gault asked about the decision to move the new home further back from the lake than the existing home. CITY OF SHOREWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING August 6, 2019 Page 5 of 6 Mr. Buerman stated that they pulled the home back twelve feet partly because of the neighbors to the east and allowed them a wider view. He stated that they did try to take into account their neighbors and their concerns. He stated that he did not think this is an extravagant home but does need to be large enough for the applicant’s family to come and visit. Chair Maddy noted that Ms. O’Donnell had brought up the issue of fairness with the previous variance and asked Planning Director Darling if she had any information on the situation. Planning Director Darling stated that at the time, there was concern that what they were proposing was more than what that particular lot could support. She noted that the standards for variances have been changed since the time that the O’Donnell’s submitted their application (2003). Commissioner Gault asked if there would be any additional fire protection required along the eastern wall because of the proximity to the other home. Planning Director Darling stated that the Zoning Code has additional requirements at three feet and at five feet but noted that a deck is not subject to those requirements. Commissioner Riedel asked about increasing the non-conformity and believes that the proposal slightly improves the non-conformity due to the amount of hardcover. He asked if adding an extra story was an increase in non-conformity. Planning Director Darling stated that the second story would require a variance even if it was the same footprint. Chair Maddy stated that in the past, pervious pavement has not been given credit. Planning Director Darling stated that there is a three-part test that requires air, water and vegetation to pass through for it to be allowed. She stated that this particular product passes the test and is 40% pervious. Commissioner Riedel stated that the concerns from the neighbors are well taken and he agreed that the variance will impact the neighbor because it is going from a one story to a two-story home. He stated that classifying this property as R1-A seems odd because it is very far from a typical R1-A lot, and requiring this lot to comply with the setback and hardcover requirements is almost meaningless. He stated that a variance is somewhat expected because unless you build on the exact footprint of what is there, a variance will be required. He stated that the question for the Commission is whether adding a second story on this lot is reasonable or not. Commissioner Gault stated that two of the neighboring houses are two-story homes. Ms. O’Donnell stated that the homes he is referring to do not have full two-stories and thinks the proposed full two-story house is not the same. Commissioner Eggenberger stated that he feels granting the variance would be in keeping with the neighborhood and does not see any reason to deny it. Commissioner Riedel stated that the applicants have made an effort to keep the hardcover down and keep the foot print close to the original. CITY OF SHOREWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING August 6, 2019 Page 6 of 6 Eggenberger moved, Riedel seconded to recommend approval of the proposed variances for property located at 27120 Edgewood Road, subject to the conditions included in the staff report, in addition to the proposed grading on the submitted survey and complete additional analysis of the culvert and drainage areas. Motion carried 4/0. B. LIAISON SCHEDULE Chair Maddy stated that Commissioner Gorham sent an e-mail that he would be unable to cover the Council meeting in August but could take December. The updated liaison schedule is as follows: August – Commissioner Eggenberger September – Commissioner Gault October – Commissioner Riedel November – Chair Maddy December – Commissioner Gorham 5. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR 6. REPORTS • Liaison to Council Council Liaison Siakel reported on matters considered and actions taken during Council’s July 22, 2019, meeting (as detailed in the minutes for that meeting). She noted that they had a lengthy work session to discuss engineering services for the City. • Draft Next Meeting Agenda Planning Director Darling stated there is a variance application slated for the next meeting. Commissioner Riedel asked about the abstention policy because that application is being submitted by a neighbor and friend of his. Planning Director Darling explained that he would need to abstain if he or a family member would be financially impacted from the discussion or the decision. She stated that in this case, he could abstain if he was concerned about a perceived conflict of interest, but he is not required to abstain. She stated that it would be his choice if he wanted to leave the table and sit in the audience for the discussion. Commissioner Riedel asked if it was reasonable for him to abstain from both the overall discussion and the vote in this situation. Planning Director Darling stated that it is reasonable in this situation. 7. ADJOURNMENT Riedel moved, Gault seconded, adjourning the Planning Commission Meeting of August 6, 2019, at 8:12 P.M. Motion passed 4/0. e� UOIauuiw 10 Alio peOcl IM a I a a a a a a a IN a a a (� a a t6 a a a O � i 7i h a > a a a a (n ca � C) a c U "- O a G a � a a 77� a a a a \e oo LL 0� a a a a N a o J a a a a CD o co }' L a a U m a a o a S 7/20/2019 „a Brian & Heidi Carpenter residence — variance request E 5875 Ridge Road Shorewood, MN 55331 Planning Commissioners, Refined Remodeling has been hired by our Clients to complete a remodel /addition of the home located at 5875 Ridge Road. The "to -be- remodeled” home currently sits on a site similar to most other homes in the neighborhood. Our request includes a setback variance from the private Ridge Road and a setback variance from the bluff zone required to complete the remodel for our Clients. Zoning Variance Narrative: We are requesting a setback variance for an addition to a small portion of the west /northwest side of the house and the north /northwest portion of the garage for a home remodel/addition project. The existing home is in desperate need of a number of general building /energy code and life- safety related updates. In addition, we are requesting the variance to accommodate Brian who has a permanent disability and allow reasonable living space for our growing family. In 2014, Brian sustained a crush injury to his left foot which will eventually result in a below the knee amputation. Brian has since had 6 surgeries and was left with minimal mobility which makes stairs and uneven surfaces difficult as well as painful. We are modifying the home to allow Brian a reasonable size one -level living layout and allow for future ADA compliance flexibility and aging in -place accessibility options (door ways, bathroom, shower, direct access to the home from the garage, etc.) in case of developments in the severity of Brian's disability. It is our intention to stay in the home for the remainder of our lives so are proposing to minimally expand the current structure to allow for the accessible living improvements described above to continue to raise our young family in the Shorewood community. Conformance to current variance standards: 1. The variance, and its resulting construction and use, is consistent with the intent of the comprehensive plan and in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the zoning regulations: All aspects of the variance request and proposed use are consistent and meet with the intent of the comprehensive plan and in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the zoning regulations. There is no,requested change to the existing use or occupancy type of the property. 2. The applicant has established that there are practical difficulties in complying with this Chapter. Practical difficulties mean: (a) The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner, but which is not permitted by this Chapter: The property owner is proposing a minimal expansion to the home and garage space that fits with other homes in the area to allow for reasonable use and enjoyment of the property — it is also based on the owner's physical disability to allow for safe, continued occupancy of the home. (b) The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner: The circumstances are driven by the existing conditions which are unique the property and were not created by the landowner. When the subject home was built it conformed to established ordinances. Due to changes in set back requirements and bluff delineation portions of the existing home now fall within the private Ridge Road and bluff setbacks preventing reasonable use and expansion. The proposed remodel /addition plans are designed to fit with the existing layout /design of the home and cause minimal disturbance to surrounding topography. The proposed changes are limited to portions of the property that are already hard- surface or previously developed parts of the property. (c) The variance, if approved, would not alter the essential character of the locality: The proposed project does not alter the essential character of the locality. The design and use of the property remain residential and fits the overall character of the area. 3. The variance would not be based exclusively on economic considerations: The variance is not based exclusively on economic conditions. It is based on modifying the homes design to accommodate for Brian's physical disability and to allow for a safe and healthy living environment to raise our growing family. This is planned to be our lifelong home. 4. The variance shall not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property, unreasonably increase the congestion in the public street or increase the danger of fire or endanger the public safety: The variance does not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent properties. There is no proposed use that increases congestion in the public street or increases the danger of fire of endangers the :public safety. The proposed project actually addresses and corrects non - conforming building code and life /safety issues with the current home. 5. The variance, and its resulting construction or project, would not be detrimental to the public welfare, nor would it be injurious to other lands or improvements in the neighborhood: The variance and its resulting construction are not detrimental to the public welfare, it is not injurious to other lands or improvements in the neighborhood. All proposed improvements are contained within the subject property. 6. The variance is the minimum variance necessary to address or alleviate the practical difficulties: The variance is the minimum variance necessary to address or alleviate the practical difficulties. The design of the remodel /addition is based on creating an accessible, main level living design with direct access from house to garage to accommodate Brian's disability. The design is based around keeping the major layout and architectural features of the existing home intact with no expansion closer to the lake side of the home. The variance requested is an addition for a protected front entry, stairs to lower level and attached garage with direct access to the home. 128 sf of the proposed home addition and 397 sf of the garage addition is within the current 58' setback to the private Ridge Road,and a small portion (90 sf), of the proposed garage addition within the bluff area adjacent the existing driveway. Due to the age of the home there are portions of the existing home living area, garage, driveway and decks that fall within the current Ridge Road and bluff zone set -backs so any proposed addition improvements require a variance. All proposed additions are within existing hard surface areas. There will be no net hardcover increase as we are planning to remove portions of existing hard surface walkways, decks or landings to balance out the 77sf overall hardcover increase as shown on the attached survey and achieve a net zero hardcover change. Thank you for your consideration, Duane Kozitka REFINED Remodeling, Inc. Bria eidi Carpenter 9£4i^£L4"Z96 :Xvj 6444"£L4'Z96 :3NOHd S r r umminN3SN3011 NNIM {._22_A 3 W3 98£99 NW '3H1f1 ONO-1 3ARI4 M01-111% *N 944 a3X3 Ho SM3NNtlldaN1/ 'sainiA3AMf1SONtll'SH33NION3lW0 uwmuulyylowasaaw-lea wyaa '3N1 `S31HI3OSSVT 92139NOMJ nrx spunodns;gpus? npux pnpa welled pue uolswedns Pa9P 6ul iepun w alu /,q peledald sra+ lNS'1pQ1gB L pPC podw m'uoPeoyloetic'u.1d Ga>aa Aww AQa+s41 3N`JI83 SNOISIA3b 3LVa \ �L \\ 2lb S . \�Fe� 7 �Npo \ yssb �\ bpys \ 96' \8�Op9b � 114�11 \ \ \ \\ \\ \ \\ \\ \ \\ \\ �o \\ \dam\ \,g Oo \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \�\-aas`— \\DIY \`\\\ �\ \ \ N O C '� y -O = m \\ \ \\\ \\\ \\ \\ \\ \ \ \\ y N"t I(\ \ \ \ \ \ CID O \� \� \ \� \\ \ \� \� \ \\ \\ m x'00 C wo cu p0 \ \ \\\ '=;8 br «c333�u �\ °�\ sew — N /� L � \ \\ \ \ \\ \\ \\ Zi \\\ NryK � `S /-I \\ \\ \\\ \\ \ \\ Z c ,,Z ICi W C @ of E m } m W- 4s\ \ \ \ \\ \ \ W >, m 4) o 0 \ \ \ \ \ \\ mmc O \ \? \ \ \\ \ \\ \ y sNrpsy \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ W 3 w m \ s \ \ o C c lD o m \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \\ Z •.0— y Om E d m d LN LILI I• `�O \ 'R'R\ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ V) 01 y C O G zp 1p OJ N sas qb \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \\ \ \ \ W m a 0 E E V z W \\ \ \\ \ \\ W r o .N CD li a. J W U_ O a Z °�s xQ /� In 3 Z d z `m O o ` i O W II U r J m 0 / ♦ ♦ ' Q z m O Z v/�/ v c U 0 o f Z N g a p g Z L9 _ c Q S �� O Jr NN r _ W Q U y 11 z cQi� q v� O)O O `T Z U ..2 W m m A SO SO) v W L 11 0 =I O Z w 01n r CAIN W ia�N II �'�� H O >O Ifi7 yy to It Y I11 0 -6 II II Y II N :1= o aD Q W 0 O' 07� Cmn 9 m II L) -6 m>. �j II mll �a m 911 U m° "La>oll ❑Qmm9 _ ❑ 10 mY mo m�N w o — a plU m'op H m U m m Qr m m m r 11 y 11 OA X Q m C> p fN C W N M X Z O � NCnL m oo m mP nNmm ❑Ommm w�W"`33333mmm+ =WO W O7 8'Z —alm mmll= u E n o w >> >II > > >II u V c� z m ll�mmm�e6 E �moam r m�000c •� 000c �mc m c� OM m n m3— `��maBcow 11 OmEEEio EEE'm mole Z a. ~ omi9a3iciy >Y >.coQL1=139 o a mmm0 onmmm0 nmU` r• to m o r o o r° O FL, 1 cr z W_ ., m W w _j mwi5ciac�7oc7aoa3ou.�� F ° as z a` z adz Fro. 00 d EXTERIOR NOTES FLASHING NOTES • KICKOUT FL45HINO TO BE IN5TALLED AS MEMO BY ROOFING CONTRACTOR • EXTERIOR WALL FIN1511ER TO VERIFY THAT KICKOUT FLASHMG 15 INSTALLED PRIOR TO FIN15141NG • CARPENTER TO FLASH ALL EXTERIOR WINDOW'S & COORS PER MN 6 IRC COPE REOUIREMENT5 WINDOW NOTE5 XXXX WINDO'W'5 COPE MIN. U VALUE- 032 MIN. 5M .0.35 • 8UILPER TO PROVIDE WIDOW ORDER L15T WITH U FACTOR, 5GFIC, 6 6% RATMG FOR EACH WINDOW 6 EXTERIOR DOOR • BUILPER TO VERIFY ALL WINDOW, POOR & OPENING FUR. WYE. • WINDOW WELLS WITH A VERTICAL DEPTH OF MORE THAN 44° MU5T BE EQUIPPED WITH AN APPROVED LAMER EXT. FINISHING NOTES XX 519ING/ 5NAKE5 XX 8 ° &3° FASCIA UNLESS NOTED OTIERWISE XX SOFFIT W/ VENT5 XX TRIM XX SHINGLES REAR ELEVATION SCALE• 1/4 °- 1'•0° BRICK FRONT ELEVATION SCALE, 1 /4 °. P-0• 0 50. FT. FF XXXX 50 FT XXXX 50. FT. TOTAL %XXX 50. FT. L L. FIN. 50. FT. TOTAL X XX SO FT T FIN XXXX 50. FT, TOTAL XXXX 50. FT. SCREEN PORCH XXXX S2 FT. DOW5 ROOM XXXX SO. FT. LOWER GARAGE a0 � xixi o� 0m_ �wE ®,� w owo u� Zo a: z 000--- 100 -Jm3 � W O t-W t7 z z - N f V z'QQ aN >� O =Q� Nd m j -O ZV ®jpJj u� f _1 �W 7V H E q0 co wV0 z 4"O pa �U n � W NC�yI I+1 4-4 -19 REVISION& u;� ORAWN BY CITY OF SHORE, IVI Existing Elevations NE IT NO. I A 09/06/2019 4:08:10 PM ERAGKET DETAIL SCALE, 1/2• • 1'-01 EXTERIOR NOTE5 FLA514IN0 NOTES • KICKOUT FLASHMIG TO BE INSTALLED AS NEEDED SY ROOFWG CONTRACTOR • EXTERIOR WAIL FINFSIER TO VERIFY THAT KICKOOT FLASHING 15 MbTALLEO PRIOR TO FINISHING • CARPENTER TO FLASH ALL EXTERIOR WIWOW5 6 DOORS PER MN 6 IRC CODE REOUIREMENT5 WINDOW NOTES MARVIN INTEGRITY WIWOW5 CODE 11111N. U VALUE • 032 MIN. 5THC • 035 • BULDER TO PROVIDE WMRDOW ORCER LIST WITH U FACTOR, SOW. 6 5T6 RATNO FOR EACH WMIPOW 6 EXTERIOR POOR • BUILDER TO VERIFY ALL Ww", ODOR d OPENIw NOR. HTS. • WINDOW WELLS WITH A VERTICAL DEPTH OF MORE THAN 44• 1AU5T SE EOUPPED WITH AN APPROVED LADDER EXT. FINISHING NOTE5 "RDIE 5101w /SHAKES MATCH EXIST. 0"63" FASCIA Uhtl_E55 NOTED OTWRW15E MATCH EXIST. SOFFIT W/ VENTS M IRATECH TRIM MATCH EXIST. SNINGlE5 i1r,1 1 film :f.: C OMNI KAROle- CC =_ I�1 13• WINDOW 6 POOR TRIM (TYP.) GARAGE FRONT ELEVATION 5CN-E� I/4' • I 12• TRIM Proposed Elevations a0 � w£ -d =W .d Z. LL: Qm3 oao3a � w wig °ALL •d 1� O (002L � O Z z j' a a R WIT ooa� m �Np o jzV ' N QQj W z a w F� o w rWr Vl FF 14 A H Wo o. � ao W U2 a Z CoU W � REVISIONS, 9.2 -19 co 5.3.19 JH CONM NO 219140 SHEET NO. / F IR5T FLOOR PLAN SCALE, 1/4'.1' -0' ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■1 ■ 5EE ENGINEERING PA6E5 51-5X Existing Floor Plan �o 4ao zoo zm- V5° a W�fLL �z Zo Zoo" aZm�� L.L —Jo 000--- d a�a z w W =� moo zwa� zNF V �aa dWOi N >� ooap - zv ® a� N P4 f� W4 Z TW V F� E- i--1 � O W O WO W H-1 CC)a � U w w a x (DATE 4.4 -19 DRAWN BY: JH COMM NO 219140 EET NO. 2 5EE ENGINEERING PA6E5 51-5X [�N g `5 z 'o 09/06/2019 4:08:12 PM (.9' . K Z0 Z. a: z ci 0. 000--- 0-3r Nh, FIXED ecReft FF %W.F I - WALL Hi. p REPLACE xm EXIST. VE' ,TL 6A 101) QX6QI T 16AFIOII 12 PATIO &hv 2Tt \Qn II II II II II II II II II II II II II II rTT u 1,11 Ile celL. HT. ITILE M5TR B19RM 114 1�t QUILT 4Q CARPET 0 ....... YET 1 0 It ----------- 6 ISLAND I GREAT iRANSIFION KQQM WOOD ...... .. 0 FLAT.. Q ! ! -------- A.1 P4 ----------- ----------- T CAST. I I I I IT -------- -------- II I; - LOCKV85 A ----------- ITILE Zd LI t DROP ------ CAST. %% il-ul a. HT, 41 KIT6HEEN -I I QARAQE 212 i i3o. I woov 2 co DPT* RECESS. 'AST 4 4' 6M. FLOOR WIP16me-MrSAI i j 2X6 GARAGE WALLS I/2 ° GYP. ED. ON -'ITLe e-61 RAILM I ALL WALLS Ile TYPE M5TR BATH °X° GYP. W. ON CEILINO FUTURE IT. Pu A SOFFIT 74-117/e WAITER ENTRY 1 P4 E. 90olt io i I ' 2 H-1 NEW CONT. Hl ....... CIL 41. --------------- V-77 V) 11' TREADS L 21.410 A o w FLAT Celt, l 9e 5TUP Y og WOOD i E- DIV L 16A213 ICA21" -NIGNE. 5L -IF 4 TEMP. TEMP. LEDGE III 3o. 74" OC ENERGY -1 ENERGY HEEL p1 ICA2941,3W 168 SOFFIT 1118-0 ICA3319,2 TRU55E5 FIORC14 (TYR) a+ 0 THW6uT- 24'0.1; sTow. 825.7y ` '4. vfNE" E-4 I- ("P.) ;,is6u55 lo" -------- TO. 6X6 W. POST FIRS T FLOOR PLAN CID TrCA05 TR -------- -------- jIC--50XwTDm VON SCALE, 1/4'-1'-0' 11 - I/. /. j,, 24X24' THIN XIT 't, �-d' e�d' 4 ov 5TONe BASE I rYP.) EXTERIOR VIMeN5ION5 ARE SHEATHM TO 5HEATHIM F IN51 FLOOR FINISHED 636 50 FT. 6ARA69 468 50. FT. 4'-g' L 44- 61j' 4'•1' 4V !1,!VffV6TE5 y v 21' •0}' 6029 MIN. u vxwemO.32 MIN. STH6, • 039 ALL WINDOWS SET 81-0 umm NOTED OTHERWISE BUILDER TO PR0VVe WINDOW ORDER LIST WITH V FACTOR 56 W & STC RATING FOR EACH WINDOW & EXTERIOR POOR BUILDER TO VERIFY ALL WINDOW, POOR A OPENWO H?R. HTS, FIR • PROVIDE FALL PROTECTION 0 OPeRATW WINDOWS GUARDRAIL NOTES • 6UARORAL REQUIRED ON OPEN 510E OF ANY STAIR MORE THAN 30 AECIVIS FLOW • ALL OPENINO55 LESS THAN 4- AT ALL CUARPRAL5 FRAMING NOTES DATE: MATCH EX15T PLATE W*Ht UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE ZX6 STUDS f T DOOR WALLS UME55 NOTED OTHERWISE 4,4,19 • DOUBLE STUDS AT ALL WIDOW a PATIO Poo" "AM R5 REVISIONS: NOTED OTHERWISE 5-2-19 CO PROVIDE LVL/LGL SOLID 6L=M AT ALL POINT LOADS, )H • ' 5•1-19 JH SUPPORT SEAMS, MICROLAM5. AND GIRDER TRUSSES To FOUNDATION 5-11-19 J14 • PROVIDE FREBLMINIO VERTICALLY f 6eLM5 & FLOORS A 13-20-19 j" HORIZONTALLY f INTERVALS NOT eXagOW 10•' 5-24-19 JH (CONCEALED 5PAX5 f SOFFITS, DROPPED CEILIN65, BETWEEN 1-29-19 69 IR STA 5TRNS 'ERS & BETWEEN STORIES 5-31-19 JH • PROVIDE DRAFT 6TOPPW BETWEEN 5TORK6 DIVIDED INTO 9-3-19 co APPROXIMATELY EOUX SPACES HOT EXCEEZ,W 1,000 SOFT. • ALL SPRAY FOAM INSULATION MUST Be CMRW BY MIN. r GYP. ED AT HABITABLE AREAS DRAWN BY: Off DETECTORS JH - �Ieg�*WmeYERY BEDROOM 67"' OotAL No comlOOR 61VIW ACC658 10 THE SevRoom ON EACH FLOOR 219140 Proposed Floor Plan WLW"* THE BASEMENT. & IN AY ROOM THAT K45 A CEILING SHEET 0. HEIGHT MORE THAN WHISPER THAN A CORRIDOR 6Ivm ACCESS TO THE BEDROOMS. PROVIDE CARBON MONOXIDE DETECTORS WnHIN 10'-0' Of ALL 3 • 5emoOM5 09/06/2019 4:06:11 PM 5EE ENGINEERING PA6E5 51-5X 0 �i fa Zap ° �wf ®Nw mo=o �a �o z ci 0. aa 00 z � w .Ta o w awo ooz zwoH- ZNy�U �aa a � rc a >r P?�o �ZJV ©JR� u Zz m " 0 P.I 0 P 0 new WALLS W Z FOUNDATION PLAN SCALE, 1/4••1'.0• W EXTERIOR DIMEN5ION ARE FROM EXTERIOR OF FOUIDATIM WALLS AT FULL 545EMENT AREAS ANT AS NOTED AT FRAMES WALLS AT LOOKOUT AND WALKOUT AREAS Ey �( 0 (n BASEMENT FINISHED 778 50 FT. BASEMENT UN•INISWA X%XX SP. PT. WINDOW d DOOR NOTES O W Q+4 MAR60 INTEGRI77 WINDOW" LOGE MN, U VALUE • 0!2 MEL BTHIG • 033 ALL W,N oWWB SET AT 6'-6° UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE allXAEA TO PROVIDE WNOW OROER L15T WITH U FACTOR, 5ORC, 6 STC RATOD FOR EACH WINDOW 6 EXTERIOR DOOR 1. allLVER TO VERIFY A- WINDOW POOR 6 OPENNO NOR. HTS. • WINDOW WELLS WITH A VERTICAL OEM Of YORE THAN 44' N R+y a MUST DE EOUE'PED WITH AN APPROVED LADDER W 0 a IL .GUARDRA NOTE5 • 6UAROR OVIREO ON OPEN SDE OF ANY STAN MOE THAN E 30' ABOVE FLOOR • ALL OPENROS LE39 THAN VAT ALL 6VARORAL5 I[�� -]1 lid R Od2 aYa M Tpa ^ �i w • ALL FLOORS TO BC L /160 /1 FOUIJATIDA WALL b FOLM�ATk ' II�X ATIOA fv W POURED WALLS W/ SINGLE PLATE BASEMENT FLOOR RAN T FLOOR RA TO WALKOUT STEM WALL O C • MAINTAIN SOX. R 0RJ O CAPACITY OTIN LOS CAPACITY 2. 00 LOS MN &RODE ABOVE T \ ODYTOM r o BOROM OF DECK 6 PORCH S To TO Be OELOW GRADE V VERIFY • MASONRY CONTRACTOR TO YERFY WALL 6 f00TMD O1 WITH SITE CO • MASONRY COUNT MASONRY CONTRACTOR VERIFY ALL VERFY ALL WALL REOUIREMENTa AT Al UNBILAJCEp pACKfX.I. LOCATIONS U L L CAT0 • BYP. W. REQUIRED AT ENTIRE CELINO (EXCEPT 60 SOFT. MAXMWM AT MECHANICAL) • )' 6YP. W. AT WALLS 6 CEILNO BELOW STARS • ALL SPRAY FOND INSULATION W5T BE COVERED BY Al EL )' OYP. W. AT HABITABLE AREAS MATCH EXIST, PLATE H eVAIT UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE 2X6 5TUOS 6 POCKET DOOR WAILS UN.E55 NOTED OTH MMIW • DOABLE STUDS AT ALL WBDOW 6 PATIO DOOR HEIOFR5 UNLeaB NOTED oRfRWISE • PROVIDE LVL /L6L 50LIP BLOCKED AT ALL POINT LOADS. SUPPORT BEAMS, I11I6ROLAM5, 6 ORDER TRUSSES TO FOUNDATION • PROVIDE FIRE BLOCKED VERTICALLY W CELROS 6 m-om5 6 HORIZONTALLY 6 INTERVALS NOT EXCEEONO I0•0' (CONCEALED SPACESW SOFFITS, DROPPED CELWDS BETWEEN STAR STRO5ER5 6 BETWEEN STORES) • PROVIDE DRAFT STOPPED BETWEEN STORES ONIDED INTO APPROXIMATELY EQUAL SPACES HOT EXCEEDED 1,000 SOFT. • PROVIDE SMOKE DETECTORS N EVERT BEDROOM 6 THE COAWA NO. CORRIDOR 61VIW ACCESS TO THE BEDROOM ON EACH FLOOR 219140 MaW INO THE BASEMENT, 6 N AY ROOM THAT HAS A CEN.M SHEET NO. )EIGHT MORE THAN 24' HICAER THAN A CORRIDOR OIVED ^ ACCESS TO THE BEDROOMS L • PROVIDE "PAM MONOXIDE DETECTORS WITHIN 10'•0' Q ALL BEDROOMS Marie Darling From: Maureen <maureenutz @gmail.com> Sent: Monday, September 16, 2019 11:32 PM To: Planning Subject: 5875 Ridge Road request for variances Dear City Council members, We are writing to you in regard to the request for variances on setback and Bluff at 5875 Rine Rd. We are in FULL SUPPORT of the owners being granted these variances. They would allow for a small front entry addition, expansion to the existing garage and replacing of a porch. We live directly across the street at 5800 Ridge Rd and share a linear easement that is a portion of RidgeRoad We 100 % believe these variances will allow the owners much needed improvement of their property and will not harmfully impact the surrounding environment. We applaud their hard work and efforts. We ask that you grant them the variances required to move forward with their improvements. Respectfully, Drs Maureen and Bill Utz Marie Darli From: Carol Smith <Carol @highfiveonline.com> Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2019 1:24 PM To: Planning Cc: Carol Smith; red smith Subject: Public Meeting for request of a Set Back and Bluff Variances - 5875 Ridge Road Dear City Council Members We are writing to you in regard to the request for variances on Setback and Bluff at 5875 Ridge Road. We are in FULL SUPPORT of the owners' request. Their proposal and ultimate house plans would have a positive impact on their living conditions and to the neighborhood. These improvements are reasonable and would not be harmful to the environment. We request that you thoughtfully consider this request and vote YES so they can move forward with their much needed building project. Respectfully submitted, Carol and Richard (Red) Smith 5860 Ridge Road