The URL can be used to link to this page

12-03-2019 Planning Commission MeetingCITY OF SHOREWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING TUESDAY DECEMBER 3, 2019 CALL TO ORDER 1. 2. 3 El 61 Q APPROVAL OF AGENDA APPROVAL OF MINUTES October 22, 2019 PUBLIC HEARINGS COUNCIL CHAMBERS 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD 7:00 P.M. A.....G....E...N...D....A ROLL-CALL /(LIAISON) SCHEDULE MADDY (tbd) GORHAM (Dec) EGGENBERGER (tbd) GAULT (tbd) RIEDEL (tbd) A) WALNUT mHILL— COMP PLAN AMENDMENT-, REZONE TO R -1C• PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLATS Applicant: Debra Hunt Location: 24340 Yellowstone Trail B) MATTHEW SAYER m- PRELIMINARY PLAT AND LOT WIDTH AND AREA VARIANCES Applicant: Sathre - Bergquist, Inc. Location: 20325 Excelsior Boulevard (Open ........publ......�.l ic hearing and continue to January 7, 2020) OTHER BUSINESS A) MINOR SUBDIVISION AND LOT, AREA VARIANCES Applicant: Lake West Development, LLC ......................... Location: 24845 Smithtown Road B) MINOR SUBDIVISION /COMBINATION (LOT LINE REARRANGEMENT), Applicant: Keenan & Sveiven, Inc. Location: 22425 Murray Street MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR REPORTS Council Meeting Report Draft next meeting agenda Assign Liaisons for Upcoming Council Meetings (through February) 7. ADJOURNMENT CITY OF SHOREWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING TUESDAY, OCTOBER 22, 2019 MINUTES CALL TO ORDER Chair Maddy called the meeting to order at 7:01 P.M. ROLL CALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD 7:00 P.M. Present: Chair Maddy; Commissioners Eggenberger, Gorham, Gault and Riedel; Planning Director Darling; and Council Liaison Siakel Absent: None 1. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Riedel moved, Eggenberger seconded, approving the agenda for October 22, 2019, as presented. Motion passed 5/0. 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES • September 17, 2019 Eggenberger moved, Gorham seconded, approving the Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of September 17, 2019, as presented. Chair Maddy noted that on page 4, there was a vote on a motion and the abstention is denoted in the incorrect order and should state "4 -0 -1 (Riedel abstained) ", not 4 -1 -0 as is stated in the minutes. Eggenberger amended his motion, Gorham seconded the amended motion, to approve the Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of September 17, 2019, as amended. Motion passed 5/0. 3. PUBLIC HEARINGS Chair Maddy explained the Planning Commission is comprised of residents of the City of Shorewood who are serving as volunteers on the Commission. The Commissioners are appointed by the City Council. The Commission's role is to help the City Council in determining zoning and planning issues. One of the Commission's responsibilities is to hold public hearings and to help develop the factual record for an application and to make a non - binding recommendation to the City Council. The recommendation is advisory only. A. PUBLIC HEARING — P.U.D. Amendment to Reduce Front Setback for Certain Lots on Prestwick Court — Minnetonka Country Club Applicant: Gonyea Homes Location: 5820, 5840 and 5860 Prestwick Court Chair Maddy opened the Public Hearing at 7:04 P.M. noting the procedures used in a Public Hearing. CITY OF SHOREWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING October 22, 2019 Page 2 of 5 Planning Director Darling explained that the applicant has proposed amending the setbacks for three homes on Prestwick Court in order to save one or two mature oak trees. She gave an overview of the location of the lots and noted that the buyer for the lot at 5860 Prestwick Court is only interested in purchasing the lot if the mature oak tree can be saved. She stated that they are proposing to build the home closer to the street to protect the majority of the drip line area. She explained that staff had some concerns about the street view if there is only one house located on the angled portion of the street. She stated that because of this concern, she asked the applicant to include the two lots to the north as part of the PUD amendment. She noted that the setbacks along Prestwick Court are not consistent because of the idea that they may be able to save some of the trees. She noted that staff finds that the request meets the standards for the PUD. Commissioner Riedel stated that there are recommendations that appear to be designed to protect the trees from damage during construction. Planning Director Darling stated that staff is recommending that the applicant consult with an arborist or landscape architect on the appropriate construction techniques to minimize the impact of construction on the trees. She stated that the other conditions were to install tree preservation fencing around the drip line and not to have grading or alteration on the site prior to the building permit. She noted that there has already been mass grading on the site, but these areas were protected with the hope that they could be saved. Chair Maddy confirmed with Planning Director Darling that these were conditions attached to the building permit. Commissioner Eggenberger asked what would stop the homes on 5840 and 5820 from being built on the original setback. Planning Director Darling stated that she did not require them to be built forward because all of the setbacks are minimum, but noted that the Commission could do a "build to" line so they are as close to the street as the lot at 5860. Chair Maddy asked if 5880 was still under the applicant's control. Planning Director Darling stated that she believes lot at 5880 is currently in for a Building Permit. Chair Maddy stated that his suggestion was going to be whether the City could push it forward five feet so there is more of a contour similar to what was done across the cul -de -sac. He stated that to do that may require an additional Public Hearing. Planning Director Darling stated that because of the road layout, she did not think that lot posed much of an issue. She stated that the Commission could still discuss the idea with the applicant. Rick Packer,mGon ea Homes, stated that the survey that they submitted shows where the home on 5880 would be and that he didn't believe the change in setback would be as impactful. Commissioner Eggenberger asked if the applicant would be opposed to a "build to" line for lots 5840 and 5820. Mr. Packer stated that he would not oppose that idea CITY OF SHOREWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING October 22, 2019 Page 3 of 5 Commissioner Riedel stated that he assumed the large silver maple on lot 5860 would be taken down, but noted that the large oak trees are beautiful and he understands why they would want them saved, if possible. Commissioner Gorham asked if the applicant typically had an arborist or landscape architect consult during the construction phase. Mr. Packer stated that they do not, but they have no issue with that being a requirement in this situation. Commissioner Gorham stated that the condition about the applicant consulting with an arborist or landscape architect is not the most detailed direction and could be interpreted in various ways. He asked if the Commission would want to more clearly define those terms. Commissioner Riedel stated that he agreed that the phrase "consult" could be construed many ways. He noted that in this instance, both the builder and the buyer have interest in preserving the trees, so adding conditions may not be necessary. He stated that if the Commission wanted to be more definitive, they could say something like, "A written recommendation be provided by a certified arborist." The Commission discussed whether or not to add an additional condition regarding recommendations by an arborist. Chair Maddy suggested that a condition be added that states, "With each of the three lots, the applicant shall obtain a written tree care summary from a certified arborist." Mr. Packer asked if this would mean that the homeowner for the other two lots would have to save the trees. He stated that he has no problem with the certified arborist working on 5860, but isn't sure about the other two lots yet. Chair Maddy stated that the condition could be specifically for lot 5860. Mr. Packer stated that he is hopeful that the other owner will want to save the other significant oak tree. Commissioner Eggenberger asked if the Commission wanted to add a condition regarding the "build to" line as suggested. Commissioner Gault stated that he understands that the second oak tree is scheduled to come down but asked if the Commission could add a condition that it be preserved. Commissioner Riedel stated that he is strongly in favor of preserving the second oak tree, but questions whether this would be within the scope of the Planning Commission. He asked Planning Director Darling if a stipulation that trees cannot be cut would be in the purview of the Planning Commission. Planning Director Darling stated that the Planning Commission could make that a requirement. Chair Maddy noted that once the building permit is closed, the homeowners could decide to take down the tree. CITY OF SHOREWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING October 22, 2019 Page 4 of 5 Chair Maddy opened the Public Hearing for comment at 7:29 p.m. There being no public comment, he closed the Public Hearing. Riedel moved, Gault seconded, recommending approval of the PUD amendment for a 30- foot front setback for certain lots on Prestwick Court — Minnetonka Country Club, by Gonyea Homes for lots 5820, 5840 and 5860 Prestwick Court, subject to staff conditions as presented, and the additional condition that a certified arborist provide a written summary of tree care for construction on lot at 5860 Prestwick Court. Motion passed 510. Planning Director Darling stated that this will come before the Council on November 12, 2019. B. PUBLIC HEARING — PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLATS FOR JARRETT ADDITION Applicant: Sathre - Bergquist, Inc. Location: 5315 Howards Point Road Chair Maddy opened the Public Hearing at 7:30 P.M. noting the procedures used in a Public Hearing. Planning Director Darling explained that the applicant would like to subdivide the property at 5315 Howards Point Road into two lots and construct one new home, with the existing home remaining. She stated that staff recommends approval based on the finding that the lots would be consistent with subdivision and zoning requirements and subject to the conditions as listed in the staff report. She stated that they are also recommending an additional condition that there be an encroachment agreement to allow the existing improvements to remain in place. David Pemberton, wwSathre -Bergin uist_ Inc., stated that he is available to answer any questions the Commission may have. He stated that the homeowners' plan is to build a new home on the northerly lot and then gift the existing home to a family member. Commissioner Riedel stated the engineer's memo dictates that the applicant install stormwater management features and asked if any trees would be taken out for the holding ponds. Mr. Pemberton stated that they will not be taking out any trees for the infiltration basins. Commissioner Gault asked why the lot lines weren't just shifted a bit in order to take care of the hard cover requirements. Mr. Pemberton stated that may be an option. Commissioner Gault noted that lots 1 and 2 were reversed between the staff report and the engineer's memo. Mr. Pemberton clarified that Lot 1 is the larger lot with the existing home. Chair Maddy opened the Public Hearing for public testimony at 7:40 p.m. Planning Director Darling noted that staff received one e-mail regarding this item in support of the request. There being no additional comment, Chair Maddy closed the public hearing at 7:41 p.m CITY OF SHOREWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING October 22, 2019 Page 5 of 5 Commissioner Riedel asked for clarification regarding the easement and whether the homeowner would be allowed to perform landscaping in that area. Planning Director Darling stated that in general, the City does not allow permanent improvements in drainage and utility easements without some type of encroachment agreement. Commissioner Riedel asked if planting shrubs would be considered a permanent improvement. Planning Director Darling noted that a permanent improvement would be a man -made structure. Gorham moved, Eggenberger seconded, recommending approval of the Preliminary Plat for Sathre - Bergquest, Inc. for property located at 5315 Howards Point Road, subject to conditions as listed in the staff report and that there be an encroachment agreement to allow the existing improvements to remain in the drainage and utility easement. Motion passed 510. 4. OTHER BUSINESS - NONE 5. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR - NONE 6. REPORTS • Liaison to Council Council Liaison Siakel reported on matters considered and actions taken during Council's October 15, 2019, meeting (as detailed in the minutes for that meeting). She noted that the Council would be directing staff to enforce the current regulations regarding fire lanes and will add a future agenda item to this effect. • Draft Next Meeting Agenda Planning Director Darling gave an overview of the applications that will be on the agenda for the December 3, 2019, Planning Commission meeting. Planning Director Darling noted that Patti Helgeson will be retiring on November 15, 2019 after serving the City for 36 years. She noted that the interview process has begun for her replacement. 7. ADJOURNMENT Riedel moved, Gorham seconded, adjourning the Planning Commission Meeting of October 22, 2019, at 7:55 P.M. Motion passed 510. CITY OF SHOREWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING TUESDAY DECEMBER 3, 2019 CALL TO ORDER 1. 2. 3 El 61 Q APPROVAL OF AGENDA APPROVAL OF MINUTES October 22, 2019 PUBLIC HEARINGS COUNCIL CHAMBERS 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD 7:00 P.M. A.....G....E...N...D....A ROLL-CALL /(LIAISON) SCHEDULE MADDY (tbd) GORHAM (Dec) EGGENBERGER (tbd) GAULT (tbd) RIEDEL (tbd) A) WALNUT mHILL— COMP PLAN AMENDMENT-, REZONE TO R -1C• PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLATS Applicant: Debra Hunt Location: 24340 Yellowstone Trail B) MATTHEW SAYER m- PRELIMINARY PLAT AND LOT WIDTH AND AREA VARIANCES Applicant: Sathre - Bergquist, Inc. Location: 20325 Excelsior Boulevard (Open ........publ......�.l ic hearing and continue to January 7, 2020) OTHER BUSINESS A) MINOR SUBDIVISION AND LOT, AREA VARIANCES Applicant: Lake West Development, LLC ......................... Location: 24845 Smithtown Road B) MINOR SUBDIVISION /COMBINATION (LOT LINE REARRANGEMENT), Applicant: Keenan & Sveiven, Inc. Location: 22425 Murray Street MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR REPORTS Council Meeting Report Draft next meeting agenda Assign Liaisons for Upcoming Council Meetings (through February) 7. ADJOURNMENT MEMORANDUM TO: Planning Commission, Mayor and City Council FROM: Marie Darling, Planning Director MEETING DATE: December 3, 2019 RE: Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Rezoning and Preliminary Plat for "Walnut Hill" APPLICANT: Debra Hunt LOCATION: 24340 Yellowstone Trail REVIEW DEADLINE: March 20, 2020 ZONING: R -IA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: FILE NO.: 19.27 REQUEST Minimum Density Residential (1 -1 units per acre) The applicant proposes to subdivide the subject property into two lots to allow construction of one new single - family home. The request includes the following approvals: • A comprehensive plan amendment to increase the allowed density on the site from Minimum Density Residential (.1 -1 units per acre) to Low Density Residential (2 -3 units per acre) • A rezoning from R -1 A to R -1 C A preliminary plat The applicant has also submitted a request for a final plat, which would be reviewed by the City Council. Notice of the application was published in the official newspaper at least 10 days prior to the meeting and mailed notice was sent to all property owners within 750 feet of the subject property. Page 2 BACKGROUND Context: The subject property was created in 2000 from a metes/bounds subdivision of (a portion of) Lot 31 Auditor's Subdivision 133, recorded in 1924. The home on the lot was constructed around 1900. The property contains mature trees and is subject to tree preservation. The site has no property within a floodplain or shoreland overlay district, nor does it contain wetlands. The topography gently slopes from the higher elevations on the southeast corner of the lot to the lowest point on the northwest corner of the property. A lication Discretion: Comprehensive plan amendments and requests to rezone are legislative roles for the Planning Commission and City Council. These types of requests have rules that apply broadly and have the most discretionary review. Requests for subdivisions are quasi-judicial roles for the Planning Commission and City Council. The role with a subdivision request is applying rules to determine if the request meets the standards and criteria in the City's existing ordinances and plans. For this application, approval of the subdivision request is dependent on the approval of the comprehensive plan amendment and rezoning. APPLICANT'S PROPOSAL The applicant is proposing to subdivide the property into two lots, one for the existing home and another for a new home to be constructed to the west of the existing. The subject property contains about 44,000 square feet (1.01 acres) which conforms to the current density allowed by the Minimum Density Residential area (1 dwelling per acre) and the minimum lot size in the R -lA zoning district (40,000 square feet). In order to subdivide, the property would need to be re- guided to a higher density area (the Low - Density Residential with 1 -2 dwellings per acre) as well as rezoned to a zoning district with a lower minimum lot area (the R -1C zoning district with a min. of 20,000 square feet). ANALYSIS Comprehensive Plan Amendment: The subject property is currently guided for minimum density residential, similar to all the adjacent properties to the west, north and east. The properties to the south across Yellowstone Trail are guided for low density residential. Yellowstone and Country Club Lane (with the exception of the property directly west of the subject property) act as the boundaries to the land use classifications. Shorewood's Comprehensive Plan includes several land use objectives �fP %��, r and policies regarding land use patterns, as follows: Minimum Density Residential • Neighborhoods are to be maintained and where necessary, (.1 -1 unittacre) strengthened in character, while at the same time improving and Low Density Residential (1 -2 reinforcing community identity unitsiacre) • Establish and maintain a consistent approach to the development of fragmented land parcels (i.e. larger lots having the potential to be subdivided) which encourages cooperation between landowners and provides for access and utility service which complies with City standards Page 3 • To the maximum extent possible, development policies and regulations shall be applied consistently and uniformly To these ends, staff encouraged the property owner to involve some or all of the surrounding properties in the area to request a similar change, especially to the west across Country Club Lane, to prevent a disjointed neighborhood boundary which would happen as if the property were re- guided on its own. Although the applicant contacted some neighbors, none elected to join the application. Consequently, staff recommends denying the request for a Comprehensive Plan amendment, finding that the request is not consistent with the objectives and policies listed above. Rezoning: Rezoning requests are reviewed with the following standards: (summarized from section 1201.04 subd. 1, d. of the zoning regulations) • The proposed action is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan • The proposed use is compatible with present and future land uses of the area • The proposed use would not tend to depreciate the area in which it is proposed • The proposed use can be accommodated with existing public services and would not overburden the city's service capacity Comprehensive Plan: Without an amendment to the City's Land Use Plan to increase the density on the site, the request is not consistent with the following policies listed in the Comprehensive Plan: • Density and lot size shall be the primary considerations in the review of development requests • Overall density shall be a primary consideration in the review of development requests Consequently, staff recommends denying the zoning ordinance amendment, finding that the request is not consistent with the policies listed for residential development in the City's Comprehensive Plan. This action is consistent with other recently reviewed applications. Most recently at Club Lane and Smithtown Road, the City rejected similar rezoning applications for two smaller properties until the request was expanded and involved a larger group of properties. The application was then found to be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan's development policies and to be creating consistent land use patterns. Preliminary Plat: Relationship to the Comprehensive Plan/Zonin Ordinance: Section 1202.01 subd. 11. directs that the enforcement, amendment, and administration of the subdivision regulations shall be accomplished with due consideration the recommendations contained in the Shorewood Comprehensive Plan. If the Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezoning are not approved, the proposed subdivision would not be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, nor the requirements of the existing R -lA zoning district. The requirements of the existing and proposed zoning districts are indicated below: Page 4 Rrol jQsgd.Lot Areas and Widths: ................... . .................... . ........ . *As measured along at the front setback along Country Club Road Access: The applicant has proposed both lots' driveways to access Yellowstone Trail in conforming locations. Country Club Right-of_Wa a,: The right-of-way width for Country Club Lane is 50 feet and collector roadways are typically constructed within a 60-foot right-of-way. Staff recommends a condition that the applicant provide an additional 10 feet of right-of-way along Country Club Road should the subdivision be approved. Yellowstone Trail is already within a 60--foot right-of-way. Public Drainaw and Utility Easements: Section 1202.05 subd. 6 requires applicants to dedicate utility easement at least 10 feet wide along each side of all property lines. The applicant's plan is consistent with this requirement, except along club lane where additional dedication is required for right-of-way, Staff recommend a condition that the applicant add the addition be included with any recommendation of approval of the subdivision. Stormwater Run-Off. The site generally drains to the northwest. The applicant has proposed a rain garden in the northwest comer of the property near the lowest point. The rain garden is asballower basin that would slow the rate of run-off aft er rain events but would not be designed keep water on the site long-term. The City's engineering consultant reviewed the development and indicates that the applicant's plan is generally consistent with the City's requirements, with a few adjustments as indicated in the attached memo. Staff also notes that the applicant would need to move the raingarden farther east to accommodate the additional right-of-way and easement dedication noted above. Tree Preservation/Lan&c4ij, jpg: The site has 19 significant trees on the property and the applicant proposes to remove one to construct the new home and other improvements. Based on the removal and the size of the site they would be required to replant three new trees. 'Me applicant's plan indicates the required trees. Encroachments: The property owner has a fence that would be or is within the right-of-way, crossing property lines and generally in non-conforming locations. Staff recommend a condition requiring the applicant to remove any portion of the fence that is not in a conforming location on Lot 2 (easterly lot) should the Planning Commission recommend approval of the application, Page 5 RECOMMENDATION: Staff finds the applicant has not shown the request for comprehensive planning amendment and rezoning is consistent with the objectives and policies of the Comprehensive Plan and recommends denial of the requests. Additionally, because the subdivision is based on consistency with the Comprehensive Plan and zoning regulations, staff further recommends denial of the subdivision request. ATTACHMENTS: Location map Engineer's memos Applicant's narrative and plans Correspondence received S.-Tlanning\Plming FilmlApplicatlansl2014 Casu Walnut Hill CPA RZ PP FPWC mnmo.d= v - Q; .. . —�o a pooh ._... �_ _ P4 a h Uolsaljlggo \ ..r 2 a a �u ...__.... *V' uapui�0 �_ m..._ as do1s�au. e� 6u�n�eu� •,..� C �;�adl/�I� e �i L w. d' 0,4/ CL ...... pal .0 CL Q LL ...... ., ° O o Y z oV PJe` use H�II Ct ' \ r Co.. ►J - 71 * F, ,Vrr M Upon review of the November 25, 2019 Preliminary Plans prepared by Advance Surveying & Engineering Co. I offer the following comments: 1. The plat must be modified to provide additional right of way for Country Club Road such 0 that it is minimum 60 feet wide. 0 2. A fully- executed utility easement on the east lot for sanitary sewer service purposes in favor of the west lot must be recorded with the subdivision documents. 3. The Public Works Department prefers a directional drill connection into the existing sanitary sewer main. 0 M 4. The contractor installing the sanitary sewer service to the west lot must register with the city in order to perform work within the right of way, must register with the City's online n right of way permitting system (ROWay) and obtain a permit to perform the work. M M z 21 0 0.. W t u> 0, W D z �c z W "X. ca Y^- GAGroup DatalMunicipaRClienls - Cities - Counties> Shorewood \DevelopmenttSubdivisionsl24340 Yellowstone (WS6 13234-000)\20191121 SUbmiltaRMEMO 20191125 AF to MD.docx F � � _ � CI) , To: AhysxonFaumke, PE, City ofShorewood From: Laura Re000du.E[T Date: October 31.2O1Q Re: 2434U Yellowstone Trail City of Shorewood, K4N WSB Project No. 013234-000 The following documents were submitted for review of compliance with the City of Shorewood's Local Surface Water Management Plan: - Preliminary Plat dated September 2S.2O1Q - Preliminary Plat (Stonnwaber Management) dated October iO.2810 - HydroCAD Reports dated October 22, 2019 This review only included the documents listed above, primarily dealing with grading, modeling, and the otonnwaternarrative. i. Provide groundwater data and verify that the low floor elevation is: a. 4D feet above groundwater elevations in the area. b. 2.O feet above known historic high groundwater elevations. 2. Verify that there is at least 3.0 feet of separation from the bottom of the rain garden to the groundwater elevation. • Verify that the scale is correct onthe Preliminary Plat and Preliminary Plat(Stormwater Management). • On the Preliminary Plat, it appears that the upper left hardcover summary title should be "Proposed Hardcover West Property." Yellowstone (WSB 13234-000)o0191022aubmival\24340 Yellowstone—Drainage Review Memo-20191031.docx °f'% chestnut cambronne 1 ATTORNEYS AT LAW Sarah B. Bennett Telephone: (612) 339 -7300 sbennettochestnutcambronne.com October 30, 2019 VIA U.S. MAIL &_E -MAIL: MDarling @ci.shorewood.mn.us Ms. Marie Darling, Planning Director City of Shorewood 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, MN 55331 17 Washington Avenue North Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55401 -2048 T: 612339J300 Fe 612336.2340 Re: Walnut Hill Proposal with Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Rezoning and Preliminary and Final Plat for 24340 Yellowstone Trail, Shorewood, MN Applicant: Debra D. Hunt, Trustee of the Marvin L. Boote Trust under agreement dated August 15, 2007, as amended Our File No. 20181084.001 Ms. Darling: In response to your letter dated October 24, 2019, this letter outlines my client's request to re -zone the subject property and if necessary, amend the City of Shorewood's Comprehensive Plan pursuant to Section 1201.04 of the City's zoning regulations and the Comprehensive Plan Amendment Guidelines (the "Guidelines ") published by the City. The subject property, 24340 Yellowstone Trail, Shorewood, Minnesota 55331 (the "Property ") is currently zoned as R -1A and my client is requesting to subdivide the existing parcel into two (2) lots, resulting in a change of zoning from R -1A to R -1C. In reviewing the City's 2040 Comprehensive Plan, the proposed subdivision and re- zoning of the Property will not result in any amendment to the text of the Comprehensive Plan; however, if the Property is subdivided and re- zoned, as requested, particular maps that are included in the Comprehensive Plan will be affected. Specifically, the map depicting Single Family Lot Sizes will be affected as the current parcel is between 40,000 - 50,000 square feet and the subdivision of the parcel will result in two (2) lots between 20,000 - 30,000 feet, the same as the lots across Yellowstone Trail immediately to the south of the Property. In addition, the map depicting the Land Use Plan will be affected in that the Property is currently classified as a Minimum Density Residential property (.1 - 1 October 30, 2019 Page 2 unit /acre) and the subdivision of the parcel would result in the two (2) lots being classified as Low Density Residential (1 -2 units /acre). However, the Property will retain its existing land use as single - family residential parcels. The proposed subdivision and re- zoning of the Property does not interfere with the goals or the policies of the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. The proposed subdivision will not negatively impact the surrounding neighborhoods or street systems. The Property is located on the corner of Yellowstone Trail and Country Club Road and would only require one (1) additional driveway, resulting in little to no interference to the traffic flow on Yellowstone Trail and no interference with the street systems. The parcels located across Yellowstone Trail to the south are all currently zoned as Low Density Residential, so the classification of the proposed subdivided parcel would be consistent with that classification. The proposed subdivision is consistent with the Housing Plan in that the character of the residential neighborhood will be maintained and respected. The existing dwelling located on the Property will remain and the proposed development of a single- family residence on the westerly parcel is compatible with surrounding properties. Shorewood is a residential community and would remain a residential community if my client's request is approved. In accordance with Section 3(B) of the Guidelines for a formal application, the following information is provided to the City in consideration of Ms. Debra Hunt's application. 1. Written descri . tion of the 2ro ,,?osed Comprehensive Plan amendment showier its mmmm m[,)rehensive mPlan and including factual information relationshi � to the Co §gpportin, the wpg uest to Chan ge the Plan: As mentioned, the proposed subdivision and re- zoning of the Property would not result in an amendment to the text of the Comprehensive Plan, but would affect two (2) of the maps associated with the Plan (Single Family Lot Sizes and Land Use Plan). Should my client's request be approved, the use of the Property will remain as a single- family residence, with a change in zoning classification from R -1A to R -1C. The proposed subdivision would only result in two (2) parcels and as a result, would not interfere with the street systems or character of the surrounding neighborhood. The proposed tree preservation plan and landscape plan demonstrates that trees and landscaping will remain intact and not disrupted by the proposed subdivision. In addition, to date, the surrounding neighbors have not objected to October 30, 201.9 Page 2 unit/acre) and. the subdivision of tie .panic el would result in. the two (2) lots being classified as Low Density.Residential. (1 2 units/acre). However, the Property will retain its existing land use as single family residential. parcels. In accordance with Section 3(B) of the Guidelines for a formal a.p.pfication, the following information is provided to the City in consideration of M.s. Debra .Hunt's application. October 30, 2019 Page 3 the proposed subdivision and change in zoning classification, as the land use remains consistent with the neighborhood. 2. General information: a. The subject property is identified as 24340 Yellowstone Trail, Shorewood, Minnesota 55331, with the legal description of the Property described on Exhibit A attached hereto. The Property is owned by the Marvin L. Boote Trust under agreement ,dated August 15, 2007, as amended (the "Trust "), and Debra D. Hunt is the trustee of the Trust. Ms. Hunt's address is 606 Alamo Pintado Road, Suite 3 - 343, Solvang, California 93463. Ms. Hunt is also the applicant. b. Professional wmConsultants: The following professional consultants have contributed in the preparation of the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment: i. Sarah B. Bennett, Esq. Chestnut Cambronne PA 17 Washington Avenue North, Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55401 ii. Tom Bloom and Mimi Wrob Advance Surveying & Engineering 17917 Highway 7 Minnetonka, MN 55345 iii. Dan Bird Rainbow Treecare 11571 K -Tel Drive Minnetonka, MN 55343 c. A4�1 h ant's Control over the Prober : The Trust became the fee owner of the Property on November 3, 2015, pursuant to that certain Warranty Deed from Marvin L. Boote, as Grantor, to Marvin L. Boote, as Trustee of the Trust, as Grantee, recorded with the Hennepin County Recorder's Office on June 20, 2016, as Document No. A10342817. A copy of the Warranty Deed is attached hereto as Exhibit B. Prior to the Trust's ownership of the Property, Mr. Boote and his wife, who is now deceased, owned the Property, which they purchased in 1960. October 30, 2019 Page 4 3. Present Status of thevPLLrot)ertTNw °. a. The address of the Property is 24340 Yellowstone Trail, Shorewood, MN 55331. The legal description of the Property is attached hereto as Exhibit A. b. The Property is currently zoned as R -1A, Single Family Residential District. The Property is currently used as a single - family residence. All lands located within 1,000 feet of the Property are zoned as R -1A, R -1C or PUD and are used as single- family residences. Attached hereto as Exhibit,. C are maps depicting the existing development of the Property and all land within 1,000 feet of the Property. The survey and proposed plat maps of Walnut Hill previously submitted to the City show the location of the existing streets, property lines, easements, water mains and storm and sanitary sewers within 100 feet of the Property. 4. Site Conditions: The site conditions of the Property, including the (i) contours, (ii) location and extent of waterbodies, wetlands, streams and flood plains within 300 feet of the Property; (iii) existing drainage patterns; and (iv) the location of existing utilities, are described in the survey, proposed plats of Walnut Hill, the tree preservation /landscape plan, the drainage and erosion control plan, the stormwater management plan with drainage calculations and map, and the tree inventory that were all previously submitted to the City. Because the applicant's request is to subdivide only one (1) parcel of residential real property with the proposed use of the subdivided parcel to remain as single - family residential use, it is not anticipated that traffic patterns will significantly or materially increase due to the proposed zoning change from R -1A to R -1C. 5. Schematic Drawing: The schematic drawing of the proposed subdivision of the Property can be found in the proposed plats of Walnut Hill previously submitted to the City. 6. Statement of the estimated numberm of w �' . nonresidential d,w elfin � units or sizes ofm_ Comprehensive rehensive Plan and a tabulation uses which_ ma, result from a chan d ��e � in the w_w of the, all roximmate allocations ofmmland use ex i ressed,,,in st.ivare feet and acres and as a percent of the total project area: a. One (1) residential, single - family dwelling unit currently exists on the Property. It is anticipated that one (1) additional residential, single- family dwelling unit will result from the proposed subdivision of the Property. October 30, 2019 Page 5 Please refer to the proposed plats of Walnut Hill. All of the area in Walnut Hill will be devoted to residential use with single - family residences on both of the proposed lots. b. As indicated on the proposed plat maps, the estimated lot size for the proposed westerly lot is 24,356 sq. ft (0.559 acre), with no existing hardcover to date. The estimated lot size for the proposed easterly lot is 20,207 sq. ft (0.464 acre), with 5,092 of proposed hardcover, resulting in the percentage of hardcover to the lot of 25.2 %. Further details are provided in the proposed plat maps of Walnut Hill. c. Given the nature of the proposed subdivision and zoning change, there are no areas devoted to open space, streets or commercial uses. 7. Proposed Chan e in Zoning Classification: The proposed change in zoning classification is from R -1A to R -1C. The applicant desires to subdivide the Property so that the proposed westerly lot may be developed for residential use by a new owner who wishes to reside in this wonderful neighborhood of Shorewood. 8. A preliminary application was not submitted, so no additional information has been requested by the Planning Commission at this time. 9. Preliminary, Develo)mentmPlans: The applicant previously submitted a proposed Preliminary Plat for Walnut Hill. The Preliminary Plat shows a proposed residential dwelling unit on the westerly lot, but at this time no drawings or plans have been prepared by a builder or architect to show the proposed structure on the westerly lot. If applicant's request is approved, Ms. Hunt intends to sell both the easterly lot with the existing dwelling and the westerly lot to be developed by a new owner. 10. There would be no text amendment to the Comprehensive Plan Amendment and the lot split would have no effect on streets, utilities or parks. 11. Identification ofmfurther actions necessarm „dement the Comm�rehensive Plan Amendment: The proposed change to the zoning classification from R -1A to R -1C must be approved and the subdivision of the Property as described in the proposed preliminary and final plats of Walnut Hill. October 30, 2019 Page 6 Should you have any questions or need anything further, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned. Thank you for your assistance with this matter. Sincerely, CHESTNUT CAMBRONNE PA o*' I? - �wk Sarah B. Bennett Enclosures cc: Debra Hunt (via U.S. mail & e -mail) 6WZ uNnoo NId3NNEH OO 1HJIH 1d 00 elep slyl wojj 6uilInsai ssoljo�jnfui'a6ewep �Iue ao; elgell aq lou pegs ClunoZ) uldeuuaH •sasodind 6ui Canuns.io 6uuaaul6u9 `le6aj ao} sigelmslou sl (Ill) pue !pulm Rue ;o (lueiaem ou gllm pagsiwnj si (n) '�oejnooe ao sssualaldwoo of se uolleluasaidej ou glim Si , sH, pagsiujry si (i) elep sigl :s}ua W WOO 000`96£$ :3mvn 13mlavw pea}sauaoH :OV3lS3WOH lelluaplsa�l :3dAl /U2BdOHd OZOZ 3'18VAVd `6402 O3SS3SSV 1,9'£L£`9$ : IV101 XVl OOO'L6£$ :3mvA13>iww pea;sauaOH :OV31S3 WO H lelluaplsay :3dAl Al2J3dO\cld 6402 TIOVAVd `8402 O3SS3SSV 3000 31dS :Vivo 3-IVS AM]d 3ivS }oejjsgV :8-1-V 4 bs 060`-bb `saaoe 40'4 :VEHV�30HVd 4££59 NW poonnaJOgS al auoIsnnollaA Oti£ -VZ :SS3�JOOV 130bVd Jsnal elooB l ul/uEN :3WVN 2J3NMO 91700'ViV£ZL44££ :OI -130bVd 6402/5Z/OL :a }eO den Aljedoad Alunoo uidauu9H S is t� } � ,i� � �. J s c e�. ,r� d� L cq ii 24340 Yellowstone Trl - 167562 Master 1 1 Black Walnut 13.5 3 3 RTreecare 09/10/19 1020486 167562 446373 2 1 Black Walnut 24.5 3 3 RTreecare 09/10/19 1062814 167562 446374 3 1 Pine, Eastern White 14 1 3 RTreecare 09/10/19 1062815 167562 446376 4 1 Pine, Eastern White 17 3 3 RTreecare 09/10/19 1062816 167562 446379 5 1 Pine, Eastern White 20 3 3 RTreecare 09/10/19 1062817 167562 446380 8 1 Maple, Sugar 18 3 3 RTreecare 09/10/19 1062818 167562 446375 7 1 Maple, Sugar 14 3r 3 RTreecare 09/10/19 1062819 167562 446377 8 1 Hackberry 12 3 3 RTreecare 09/10/19 1062820 167562 446381 3 1 Maple, Norway 16 2< 3 RTreecare 09/10/19 738706 167562 446382 1.0 1 Maple, Norway 9 1 3 RTreecare 09/10/19 1062806 167562 446384 11 1 Black Walnut 22.5 3 3 RTreecare 09/10/19 1062807 167562 446385 1.2. 1 Black Walnut 52 2 3 RTreecare 09/10/19 695494 167562 446386 13 1 Honey Locust 24 2? 3 RTreecare 09/10/19 1062808 167562 446388 i 1.4 1 Black Walnut 21.5 3 3 RTreecare 09/10/19 1062809 167562 446389 15 1 Ash,Green 18.5 3> 3 RTreecare 09/10/19 1062810 167562 446390 16 1 Ash, Green 31.5 2 3 RTreecare 09/10/19 1062811 167562 446391 17 1 Ash, Green 13.5 2 3 RTreecare 09/10/19 1062812 167562 446392 18 1 Ash, Green 18.5 3 3 RTreecare 09/10/19 1062813 167562 446393 19 1 Crabapple 9.5 3 3 RTreecare 09/10/19 738707 167562 446383 T OF: WALNUT HILL PROPOSED DRAINAGE MAP s w Sn Q STORMWATER REQUIREMENTS 1. VOLUME CONTROL - ONSITE RETENTION & FILTRATION OF 1.0 -INCH STORM EVENT OVER PROPOSED NEW IMPERVIOUS SURFACES. • PROPOSED NEW IMPERVIOUS AREA = 2816 SQUARE FEET • REQUIRED VOLUME TO FILTER = 2,818 X (1/12) = 235 CUBIC FEET VOLUME OF RETENTION PROVIDED (RAIN GARDEN SURFACE STORAGE) = 406 CUBIC FEET *RAIN GARDEN MLL DRAW DOWN WITHIN 48 HOURS* 2. RATE CONTROL - NO NET INCREASE IN RUNOFF RATE TO NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES FROM EXISTING TO PROPOSED SITE COND171ONS FOR THE ATLAS 14: 1, 10, 100 -YEAR, 24 HOUR STORM EVENTS. REFER TO STORMWATER RUNOFF RATE SUMMARY TABLE. Advance umeying & Engineering, Co. 17917 Highway 7 Minnetonka, Minnesota 55345 Phone (952) 4747964 Web: www.advsur.com DReIliP9 ^�:�, 12' HDPE FES WIMA -W GUARD 4V�Saao ` -J4 LF - 12' HDPE ® 2.9X •``- /HSrAU ROPY CONSMUCWN DV?RANC£ PER N07ES '-12` HOPE FES WIMASH WAND - W -979.0 EXISTING STORMWATER RUNOFF' . RATE SUMMARY (CFS) OQ+ GE Few .. www litG� r �t �10C0L4WuGtLW eicChG0r�7Cl+A( 1 -YEAR El (CFS) � "� �. STORM EVENT 0.44 10-YEAR . ...... /� 1... Ge(� lVWev,t �eCS �` f�' 'i1`6 51A,00-1 100 - YEAR .............._. 3.59 RATE (C STER RUNOFF ) E STORM EVENT PT(CFS) 1 -YEAR 0.36 10 -YEAR 1.51 100 -YEAR 3.14 *NOTES: 1. RESULTS ARE DERIVED FROM HYDROCAD MODELING SOFTWARE UTILIZING ATLAS 14 STORM DATA. 2. HYDROLOGIC SOIL GROUP "C ". 3. RESULTS CONFIRM THAT THE RATE CONTROL REQUIREMENTS HAVE BEEN MET. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY WE OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONA!a „ „NQNEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINN „ eA,1 ,J:. -� jo 0 S R nke .. 52716 .. UCEN8E N6. OCTOBER 10 2019 DATE ,�� 1°�'bU-0- �eFLacPaue�+3 IF oeLIJ'aec�(ercirC�f 2� LEOFIVO A27SM6? COATOOR ,0=0140 SPOT AMV4TIOAr PRPOPOSh'O CONmmp 6LV DR4llV4G6° AWOA - FLOW SILT F"CB/6I0 ROLL SF — EffS AIG .0"0164CS "M ® El PROPOSED PWV40r ",F,4 m P1 Ip vvawecrmxrvsPOU>s TO = - -•I -- Pm PW aaurm hvro i PROPOSW ?,VN GARDEN ry - U STORMWATER REQUIREMENTS 1. VOLUME CONTROL - ONSITE RETENTION & FILTRATION OF 1.0 -INCH STORM EVENT OVER PROPOSED NEW IMPERVIOUS SURFACES. • PROPOSED NEW IMPERVIOUS AREA = 2816 SQUARE FEET • REQUIRED VOLUME TO FILTER = 2,818 X (1/12) = 235 CUBIC FEET VOLUME OF RETENTION PROVIDED (RAIN GARDEN SURFACE STORAGE) = 406 CUBIC FEET *RAIN GARDEN MLL DRAW DOWN WITHIN 48 HOURS* 2. RATE CONTROL - NO NET INCREASE IN RUNOFF RATE TO NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES FROM EXISTING TO PROPOSED SITE COND171ONS FOR THE ATLAS 14: 1, 10, 100 -YEAR, 24 HOUR STORM EVENTS. REFER TO STORMWATER RUNOFF RATE SUMMARY TABLE. Advance umeying & Engineering, Co. 17917 Highway 7 Minnetonka, Minnesota 55345 Phone (952) 4747964 Web: www.advsur.com DReIliP9 ^�:�, 12' HDPE FES WIMA -W GUARD 4V�Saao ` -J4 LF - 12' HDPE ® 2.9X •``- /HSrAU ROPY CONSMUCWN DV?RANC£ PER N07ES '-12` HOPE FES WIMASH WAND - W -979.0 EXISTING STORMWATER RUNOFF' . RATE SUMMARY (CFS) OQ+ GE Few .. www litG� r �t �10C0L4WuGtLW eicChG0r�7Cl+A( 1 -YEAR El (CFS) � "� �. STORM EVENT 0.44 10-YEAR . ...... /� 1... Ge(� lVWev,t �eCS �` f�' 'i1`6 51A,00-1 100 - YEAR .............._. 3.59 RATE (C STER RUNOFF ) E STORM EVENT PT(CFS) 1 -YEAR 0.36 10 -YEAR 1.51 100 -YEAR 3.14 *NOTES: 1. RESULTS ARE DERIVED FROM HYDROCAD MODELING SOFTWARE UTILIZING ATLAS 14 STORM DATA. 2. HYDROLOGIC SOIL GROUP "C ". 3. RESULTS CONFIRM THAT THE RATE CONTROL REQUIREMENTS HAVE BEEN MET. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY WE OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONA!a „ „NQNEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINN „ eA,1 ,J:. -� jo 0 S R nke .. 52716 .. UCEN8E N6. OCTOBER 10 2019 DATE ,�� 1°�'bU-0- �eFLacPaue�+3 IF oeLIJ'aec�(ercirC�f 2� LEOFIVO A27SM6? COATOOR ,0=0140 SPOT AMV4TIOAr PRPOPOSh'O CONmmp 6LV DR4llV4G6° AWOA - FLOW SILT F"CB/6I0 ROLL SF — EffS AIG .0"0164CS "M ® El PROPOSED PWV40r ",F,4 m P1 O O ti ee i 'g HL BOO 166 i gPq Z3� 3 0 wig MR q i I IN; Nil III .................... . . ............. . 09 q') 8 I OH; HL BOO 166 i gPq Z3� 3 0 wig MR q i I IN; Nil III .................... . . ............. . 09 q') 8 I z 'T IS a t It f 1 6 �El Ei It cc s 2L IN d �E iE 13 �s E a Ks. s a.s A a P4 . z — 15 22 s 1H —oFG� ti . gg t5 q rzg 92 , , . .-,4 1g) lb- ---- _.___ —\ spin L r 1 ta� ��1 .... . . . . ....... . ...... z 'T IS a t It f 1 6 �El Ei It cc s 2L IN d �E iE 13 �s E a Ks. s a.s A a P4 . z — 15 22 s 1H —oFG� ti . gg t5 q rzg 92 , , . .-,4 1g) lb- ---- _.___ —\ spin .... . . . . ....... . ...... 2g W rd . . . ............. . ff Boote Land Use and Rezoning Request City of Shorewood Country Club Drive Shorewood. MN To whom it may Concern, We are neighbors who live two lots to the east of Mr. Boote and understand that he is seeking to re- guide and rezone his property in order to subdivide his current lot into 2 y acre lots for resale. While we do not wish to make any such changes to our property at this time, we have no issue with Mr. Boote's request to do so. Therefore, we would ask the City to grant his request for Land Use Revision and Re- zoning in order to subdivide his property. Regards � � ,�'.. �..._ ....... —Date; " 1 4 gym" ,�J K', rt i D ill CITY OF 5755 Country Club Road • Shorewood, Minnesota 55331 •952- 960 -7900 www.ci.shorewood.mmus • cityha11 @ci.shorewood.mn.us MEMORANDUM TO: Planning Commission, Mayor and City Council FROM: Marie Darling, Planning Director MEETING DATE: December 3, 2019 RE: Preliminary plat and variances for a subdivision of property APPLICANT: Sathre- Bergquist, Inc. LOCATION: 20325 Excelsior Blvd REVIEW DEADLINE: To be determined ZONING: R -2A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: FILE NO.: 19.25 REQUEST Low to Medium Density Residential (3 -6 units per acre) The applicant proposes to subdivide the subject properties into four lots for two new single - family homes. At this time the applicant requests additional time to complete their application. Notice of the application was published in the official newspaper at least 10 days prior to the meeting. A mailed notice and a revised mailed notice was sent to all property owners within 750 feet of the property. Staff requests this item be continued to the January 7, 2020 meeting to allow the applicant time to complete their application. ATTACHMENTS Location map Applicant's plan SAPlanningtPlanning FiWApplita m02019 Casm\Matlhm Sayer SubI\PC memo- Continuance..do S a q5a'? a �a�.a sa s�� 9sxla tz 1 a i� xg�a F b 4 d $ • ., a�.m ,.oexxxx a ®o¢ao enstofia- �Ll�l ®� ®�a�m� oa 3 m k'ea HI 14 &azza zz$ act�ffa ? O F s 3g a 00 3 v Y m 3 n,.. PPY aLPP g n s �i 5 1 � �� j'I '� �� v� ��..$•. �1�: � ��533��3iYy §a'i €�s�aa3"�� x"n3JAI Pa�f / •/ j s � 35a5ansa a swx can .;a a a „ z» � a r � x fgri� i g4 v s / a d gg g8gg gggggg 88 gggg gpp yy ggyy yy pgppg y8 �g91. !/ /! • �z / /r/�}i 'r/ vw. �''zzn..„ _ »n_ �x_a� „s xa a..�n; ,� .,ass �. o � IN 1 j a - / � a it %i� I e� 5 i a v O+ 10 Y An -M l-�`_'d e v g ” am v' v. R u r n r na n a n / "jog �� . w w `M 1p OKI s 0a "mini•..- ti I � a��$�� T k\ ab #� mms' Limo aaNE i �^tl� .reo d'uo ,� �, ro4' g §H 8 s S a q5a'? a �a�.a sa s�� 9sxla tz 1 a i� xg�a F b 4 d $ • ., a�.m ,.oexxxx a ®o¢ao enstofia- �Ll�l ®� ®�a�m� oa 3 m k'ea HI 14 &azza zz$ act�ffa ? O F s 3g a 00 3 v Y m 3 n,.. PPY aLPP g n s �i 5 1 � �� j'I '� �� v� ��..$•. �1�: � ��533��3iYy §a'i €�s�aa3"�� x"n3JAI Pa�f / •/ j s � 35a5ansa a swx can .;a a a „ z» � a r � x fgri� i g4 v s / a d gg g8gg gggggg 88 gggg gpp yy ggyy yy pgppg y8 �g91. !/ /! • �z / /r/�}i 'r/ vw. �''zzn..„ _ »n_ �x_a� „s xa a..�n; ,� .,ass �. o � IN 1 j a - / � a it %i� I e� 5 i a v O+ 10 Y An -M l-�`_'d e v g ” am v' v. R u r n r na n a n / "jog �� . w w `M 1p OKI s 0a "mini•..- ti I � a��$�� T k\ ab #� mms' Limo aaNE i �^tl� .reo d'uo ,� �, ro4' VII '73 `1111 TO: Planning Commission, Mayor and City Council FROM: Marie Darling, Planning Director MEETING DATE: December 3, 2019 RE: Minor subdivision and variance APPLICANT: Lake West Development LOCATION: 24845 Smithtown Rd. REVIEW DEADLINE: February 18, 2020 ZONING: R -1 C COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: FILE NO.: 19.24 REQUEST Low Density Residential (1 -2 units per acre) The applicant proposes to remove the existing buildings and subdivide the subject property into two lots. The request also includes a variance to lot area to allow both lots to contain less area than required by the R -1 C zoning district. Notice of the application was mailed to all property owners within 500 feet of the property at least 10 days prior to the meeting. Page 2 BACKGROUND Context,:, The subject property was originally part of Auditor's Subdivision 133 recorded in 1924 and later further divided by other minor subdivisions. The home (24845 Smithtown Road) was built around 1925. The Club Lane right -of -way was dedicated to the public as part of the Auditor's Subdivision with a width of 8.5 feet. More recently, the City acquired an additional 21 feet of right -of -way by easement. The subject property as well as all the existing homes on Club Lane and five other nearby properties fronting on Smithtown Road were rezoned in January of 2017 from R -lA to R -1C. Earlier this year, the applicant submitted a Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Rezoning, PUD (Concept and Development Plan) and Preliminary Plat for both this property and the property to the south to allow construction of nine homes. The applicant withdrew the application prior to City Council review. The property contains mature trees and is subject to tree preservation. The topography of the site is relatively flat and it contains no property within a floodplain or shoreland overlay district nor within wetlands. ANALYSIS A. Minor Subdivision. The applicant proposes to subdivide the property into two parcels for new homes. All of the existing structures would be removed. Lot Width/Area: Section 1202.05 subd. 2. c. of the subdivision regulations requires that all lots have adequate frontage on a city approved street to accommodate a driveway and required driveway setbacks. Additionally, section 1201.13 of the zoning regulations has specific area and width requirements for newly created lots. The current and proposed lot areas and widths are shown below: *As measured at the front setback "Variance Requested Rig ➢t -of -Way /Easements: Section 1202.05 subd. 4. h. of the subdivision regulations requires 50 feet of right -of -way for all local streets. This additional dedication reduces the size of the property by about 4,500 square feet. As a condition of approval, staff recommends the applicant submit an executed copy of a right - of -way easement for the easterly 20.5 feet for a total of 50 feet of right -of -way. Section 1202.05 subd. 6 requires 10 -foot drainage and utility easements around the periphery of each lot. As a condition of approval, staff recommends the applicant submit executed copies of drainage and utility easements prior to recording the subdivision with Hennepin County. Page 3 Access /Lot front e: Section 1202.05 subd. 2. c. requires that every lot have adequate frontage on a city approved street to accommodate a driveway and section 1201.03 subd. 5 of the zoning regulations requires a 40 -foot driveway setback from the intersection of property lines at the corner and a five -foot setback from the south property line. The property is a corner lot and both lots would provide an adequate amount of lot width to construct a conforming driveway consistent with setbacks. Stormwater Run- Off/Gradip : The applicant is proposing to construct an infiltration basin for each lot. Staff reviewed the storm water calculations based on the additional impervious created by construction of the new homes and the grading proposed. Subject to the review comments in the attached engineer's memo, the applicant's proposal would be able to meet the city's requirements for rate control by expanding the basins and providing some additional information. The applicant's proposal indicates the building pad for Lot 1 is relatively flat, the attached engineer's memo includes a recommendation to provide more info on how the lot would drain. Utilities: Lot 1 has access to municipal water and sewer. Lot 2 would have access to municipal sewer but would provide water using a well. A right of way permit issued by the City of Shorewood would be required for the work in the right -of -way. Tree Preservation: The applicant has identified several significant trees that would be removed to accommodate the improvements. Based on the size of the property, nine new trees would need to be planted on the lots. There is adequate room for the additional trees on the two lots. Two of the new trees are shown planted in the right -of -way. Staff recommends a condition that the plans be amended to show the trees planted on private property. B. Variances City Code allow for subdivision variances upon showing that unusual hardship exists and that the request is consistent with the intent of the regulations. Section 1202.08 subd. 1 of the Shorewood Subdivision Regulations sets forth criteria for the consideration of variance requests. Staff reviewed the request according to these criteria, as follows: 1. Are the proposed uses compatible with the existing uses in the vicinity? The subject property and all the surrounding properties are currently zoned and guided for residential purposes. No change in use is proposed and consequently the uses would remain compatible. 2. Are there special and unique circumstances or conditions affecting the property that are not common to other properties in the city and the strict application of the provisions of this chapter would deprive the applicant of the reasonable and minimum use of its land? The amount of land dedication for this property is unusual. The properties along the west side of Club Lane have contributed all but 8.5 feet of right -of -way. Staff finds that denying the variance and the subdivision would not permit the property owners of a reasonable and minimum use of their land. 3. Would the variance cause detrimental impact to public welfare /adjacent properties? Approval of the variance would create a correction to the existing situation on this property. Presently, the narrow section of roadway is located on the easterly side of the right -of -way. When the Page 4 road is eventually reconstructed, the additional right -of -way would allow the street to be centered in the right -of -way. This would benefit all the homeowners in the area. 4. Would the variance correct the inequity resulting from the hardship? Approval of the variance would correct the inequity. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the minor subdivision and variances based on the finding that the lots would be consistent with subdivision and zoning requirements with the following conditions: Prior to recording the subdivision, the applicant complete the following: • Submit executed drainage and utility and the right -of -way easements. • Submit payment of one park dedication fee and one local sanitary sewer access charges. • Remove the accessory buildings and improvements that would be located on Lot 2. • Revise the plans as follows: • Consistent with the City Engineer's memos dated October 31 and November 12, 2019.m • Relocate the proposed trees to private property. Prior to issuance of a building permit for either lot: a. With the building permit application, the applicant shall submit a tree preservation/landscaping plan signed by a licensed forester, arborist or landscape architect. b. Prior to installing services or conducting other work in the right -of -way, obtain a right -of -way permit. c. Prior to construction of improvements on either lot, the applicant must acquire the appropriate permits. Staff acknowledge that the variance criteria are subjective and that the Planning Commission could reasonably find the variance criteria are not met. ATTACHMENTS Location map Applicant's narrative and plans Engineer's memo S: P1=iagl 1—i.g F.1.\App1i.6...12019 C.—TIO Lane MS Lake W.APC m —o.d- =I NISSO Z:z r Smitht6,,,- R� Fxu - 11--- . . D _�ro .... . .... ... .. . .. .. . .. ..... .. . . ...... ......... .. Dr, a'an e m 0 0 r . ............... s S �Dr . . . ..... ....... ...... . ........ . ..... . . Hardi-ig.La --------------- ------- O-w" 3 0 0 0 0 C C: —W ',Iub-Rd ,CD -Pyj)Di -c OL- tariLb ........ ... :3-. rn o 0 ;CD - 0 I'CD . .. . ...... Ille Y� n CD 91 vb, . ...... ...... . . --- Goul :7 . ............ 1 -4- Riviera La 1, L-.-L- L-T-A ... . . . ...... - - - - - ----------------- 4n u 3 0 0 0 0 C C: —W ',Iub-Rd ,CD -Pyj)Di -c OL- tariLb ........ ... :3-. . . .... ....... ........ .. ----- . ....... .. - ;CD - � I C h r069-0 m Ig-\L6 Minor Subdivision — Narrative CLUB LANE MINOR SUBDIVISION 24845 Smithtown Road Shorewood, MN 55331 October 21, 2019 Overview Lake West Development, LLC requests Minor Subdivision approvals in order to re- develop the property at the southwest corner of Smithtown Road and Club Lane in Shorewood, MN. This submittal proposes subdividing the property into 2 single family lots. If 0,01 � a r i Perry Ryan, PE Ryan Engineering 952 - 221 -3700 CLUB LANE MINOR SUBDIVISION - Narrative A. Contact Information Owner of Record Bryan Pike 24845 Smithtown Road Shorewood, MN 55331 Applicant Lake West Development LLC, 14525 Highway 7, Suite 265 Minnetonka, MN 55345, Phone 952 - 930 -3000 B. Site Data Address 2485 Smithtown Road Shorewood, MN 55331 Zoning Residential Single Family Parcel Size 1.11 acres 48,422 sq. ft. Lot 1 = 24,954 Gross sq. ft. (19,856 net of City Easement) Lot 2 = 23,468 Gross sq. ft. (19,316 net of City Easement) PID 3311723240032 Description See Minor Subdivision drawing, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Abstract Property. C. Land Characteristics The property is relatively flat and slopes generally to the South. There is one existing home on the site with a driveway and outbuildings. The property is scattered with trees as shown on the Existing Conditions Plan and Tree Preservation Plan. The project is comprised of one parcel and is served by Club Lane which is a narrow non- conforming roadway. There is sanitary sewer within the roadway, however the parcel is not served by City water except for a service to the northerly home. D. Description of the Project The proposal is to subdivide the existing 1.11 acre parcel into 2 single family lots and City Easement dedication for any future Club Lane expansion. Page 2 of. CLUB LANE MINOR SUBDIVISION - Narrative E. Stormwater Mana ement Stormwater Management will be through a proposed infiltration basin at the rear of each yard as shown on the Grading Plan. All roof drainage on the lots will be directed to the infiltration basins. See the Stormwater Management Plan and Hydrocad calculations for further detail. F. Variance Reauest Per Section 1202.09 of the Shorewood City Code, we provide the following responses to the criteria in the code: Criteria "a ". There are special and highly unique circumstances or conditions affecting the property that are not common to other properties in the city and that the strict application of the provisions of this chapter would deprive the applicant of the reasonable and minimum use of its land, As shown on the Minor Subdivision drawing, the two proposed lots meet the area requirements prior to dedicating the proposed City Easement for potential future expansion of Club Lane. Without this burden of placing the majority of the 50' easement on this property, a variance would not be required. The properties across the street do not have this additional burden. Criteria b " . That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public health or _ , welfare or injurious to other property in the vicinity in which the property is situated; The granting of the variance will have no negative affect on public health or welfare to other properties in the vicinity of the area and are in keeping with the neighboring properties. Criteria "c ". That the variance is to correct inequities resulting from an extreme hardship limited to topography, soils or other physical factors of the land. As mentioned in the paragraph above for Criteria "a ", this burden is being placed only on the properties on the west side of Club Lane and therefore could be considered a correction of inequities of the physical factor of the land in relation to Club Lane. Page 3 r P' 3 ._ —_ �� J ry) L �� 5" r �. �� e m � 6� — � gs N & $ � � _ m a ry x m _.. 1[ � _i n '_I oyuno� �� I ._ —_ �� J ry) L l v'„ ., I l��t t I� �, e( ,j [ � � n F i , � �r —' N f LU U° C t a .y 3: ��, i i , i° ., , i� 8 , i — _._. t i ,., � _— :..,. I� 14 �� µ t c iU a i � � � o __--- —_ -- � i , ..; w �, w f i I�; ,. m �� R��^ 1'� r — a >�M11'1�4i rN.7 �� -- �� __ ..... 0.� L S Ii a aiE 40 f. V 3a EI N 161 Icy iY I Nil c Z zw 0. yd .0 -0 Ah C: 's ml 1 ca r in cc os sn D M z O die op _3 n C Ow 1 0.� L S Ii a aiE 40 f. V 3a EI N 161 Icy iY I Nil AIMOJJ-WY"9 -IN/d /V -1mim V 5/7-13 .01NA40 'VIOSANIIN 'llNnoO NId3NN3H '££t "ON NO'SA cans S,80ljOnv6 iol 30 3NI 1 un0s 3Ri 30 R18ON 13I91*691ONV RIM 131IVdVd 'd 2W OVOY NMO-t'-WA'S Cd C 0 0 C c .0 -0 Ah C: 's ml 1 ca r os O op Ow 1 AIMOJJ-WY"9 -IN/d /V -1mim V 5/7-13 .01NA40 'VIOSANIIN 'llNnoO NId3NN3H '££t "ON NO'SA cans S,80ljOnv6 iol 30 3NI 1 un0s 3Ri 30 R18ON 13I91*691ONV RIM 131IVdVd 'd 2W OVOY NMO-t'-WA'S Cd C 0 0 C 1111 If 1 *1 O Of O V) 0 Uj 0 1 Ud 9- IN ll� < v 4y n � 96 c .0 -0 Ah C: 's C6 0-0 ca r 1111 If 1 *1 O Of O V) 0 Uj 0 1 Ud 9- IN ll� < v 4y n � 96 oN lau rs Is PZ1 OZ g� "t Q Id ie m 1(3n 4i C MCI 3� 6t [L. 5: ro 0 'Al Mi V n NMO.04VOI g� 21, Q Id ie m 1(3n 4i MCI C.D ) 11.1 E [L. 5: 0 Mi V g gg co of f NMOJJ4"' L.3 n NMO.04VOI g� II I Q Id ie m 1(3n 4i n NMO.04VOI C ci IL C 0 0 L- w taJ LJ I ty ty g� cloo .9 g'— C.D ) 11.1 E [L. 5: C ci IL C 0 0 L- w taJ LJ I ty ty g� 0 Mi V g gg co of f L.3 a 0 551 I'; 2 w CL t:I P 0 4 tF_ C ci IL C 0 0 L- w taJ LJ I ty ty Z! , M, PO" 0tv W"'e �'v ' R"; N H a I P4 4, % X Mi V g gg L.3 0 551 I'; tF_ Z! , M, PO" 0tv W"'e �'v ' R"; N H a I P4 4, % X Upon review of the October 21, 2019 Preliminary Plans prepared by Ryan Engineering I offer the following comments: �E 1 . The contractor installing the sanitary sewer service for Lot 2 must register with the city in 0 order to perform work within the right of way, must register with the City's online right of way permitting system (ROWay) and obtain a permit to perform the work. a z W 2. On Sheet P-2 the area west of the building pad shown for Lot 1 is flat- provide additional information to indicate how this area will drain. A 2% grade is recommended. Gs LCJ i J CD M z x CJ GAGroup Data\MunicipaKlients - Cities - CountieskShorewoodiDevelopment\Subdivisions124845 Smithtown Road (WSB 14870-000)W191021 SubmittaRMEM0 20191112 AF to MD.docx A VTM 70T FM =0 To AlyoonFauake. PE, City ofShorewood From: Laura Rescorla, EIT Re: Club Lane Minor Subdivision City ofShorewood, MN VVS8 Project No. 013228-000 The following documents were submitted for review of compliance with the City of Shorewood's Local Surface Water Management Plan: q - 80onnwmbar Management Plan dated October 21.2OiQ � - Preliminary Plans dated September 24.2O1Q. revised October 21.2019 m M U) This review only included the documents listed above, primarily dealing with grading, modeling, and the ntonnwmbernarrative. Updated comments and/or resolutions are in bold. � � 1. An MSE 3 ebonn distribution should be used in the HvdroCAD mude|ina rather than Tvna � LO 2. Resolve the HydroCAD warnings given for Ponds 4P and 5P in the 100-year event. � Resolved. � U) 1 3. The Hennepin County Natural Resources Map indicates that the soils in the area of the � proposed infiltration basins are HSGC/D. Additionally, m previously submitted < geotechnical report for this site, indicates that the underlying soil is sandy lean clay (HSG � hour), verify that it has been observed on the site at the location of the proposed infiltration basins. � M Per the Minnesota Stonnwater Manual. "It ishiahlv recommended that native soils in � proposed infiltration areas have a minimum infiltration rate of 0. 2 inches per hour — (by»�a0yH8G/Lfl and Cso0�^Ho�evor if use an infiltration capacity of 0.06 inches per hour. � � . . U) Resolved. The infiltration capacity has been updated toU.06inches per hour. m � 4. The infiltration basins must draw down within 48 hours; see comment 3 regarding > infiltration me0oo. omumo° Road (WSB 14870-000)�20191021 SubmumhC/ub Lane Subdivision Drainage Review Memo 20191031.docx Ms. AlyaonFaueke October 31.2O1A Page ��=_ 0 6. Verify drainage patterns. h appears that the front half of each proposed parcel (potentially including the front half of each roof) will drain to Club Lane rather than ho the infiltration basins. Update the HydroCAD modeling accordingly. Add discharge points as necessary tm capture the various directions of offsite discharge. l Verify the low opening and low floor elevations for the proposed homes. 8. Based on the HydroCAD modeling, the water quality volume provided in the Parcel 1 Basin is 181 cf and in Parcel 2 Basin is 230 cf. The total volume required, 448 cf, is not met. On sheet P-2, the basins appear to be the same size. Smithtown Road (WS 14870-000)u0191021 aubmmmhClub Lane Subdivision Drainage Review Memo 20191031.docx *1W CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 Country Club Road • Shorewood, Minnesota 55331 •952- 960 -7900 www.ci.shorewood.mn.us • cityha11 @ci.shorewood.mn.us MEMORANDUM TO: Planning Commission, Mayor and City Council FROM: Katriona Molasky, Planning Technician MEETING DATE: December 3, 2019 RE: Minor Subdivision (Lot Line Adjustment) LOCATION: 22425 Murray Street and 6175 Cardinal Drive APPLICANTS: Keenan & Sveiven, Inc. REVIEW DEADLINE: March 8, 2020 ZONING: R -1 C/S FILE NO.: 19.29 REQUEST On behalf of the property owner, the applicant requests this minor subdivision to move the shared lot line further west between two parcels owned by the same property owner and located at 22425 Murray Street and 6175 Cardinal Lane. The request is to accommodate changes to the pool and accessory buildings and an increase in the impervious surface coverage on 22425 Murray Street. BACKGROUND Context: The subject property at 22425 Murray Street is currently developed with a single - family home. The existing home at 22425 Murray Street was constructed in 1941 and remodeled in 2002. The property at 6175 Cardinal Lane is undeveloped. Under the plan, the existing home would remain. Both parcels were part of lot 90; created as part of the Auditor's Subdivision No. 135 in 1924. Lot 90 was subsequently subdivided into the current properties by metes and bounds subdivision. Page 2 The properties contain mature trees. The landscaping proposal does not include tree removal of any living trees. The properties are not within a 100 -year floodplain or wetland. The northerly portion of the properties are within the shoreland overlay district. The adjacent properties are all developed with single family homes. ANALYSIS Lot Width/Area: The current and proposed lot areas and widths are shown below. *As measured at the front setback Easements: Section 1202.05 subd. 6 requires 10 -foot drainage and utility easements around the periphery of each lot. As a condition of approval, staff recommends the applicants be required to provide easements consistent with city code requirements. Impervious Surface Coverage: Shorewood City Code section 1201.02 identifies impervious service as "an artificial or natural surface through which water, air or roots cannot penetrate ". Section 1201.03 subd. 2.0 states that the maximum ratio of impervious service to lot area for all lots in a shoreland district is 25 %, while for residential lots outside the district, the maximum coverage is 33 %. The existing property at 22425 Murray Street does not conform to City Code requirements for impervious surface coverage. The proposed lot line adjustment allows the parcel to conform to City Code with the alterations to the pool, accessory units, and landscaping, as shown below. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the lot line adjustment between properties, subject to the applicants' submission of executed 10 -foot drainage and utility easements. ATTACHMENTS Location Map Applicant's narrative Survey of properties: Existing Survey of properties: Proposed Engineer's Memo S:1 I— ingft..ing M.Uppr— ti ... \2019 CasesQ- 0122425 M—y SIt d\PC M—d- %... PR4PflSED ,, R�QUIREU; R -1C S R -IC S R -1C S — — ----------- 22425 Murray Street 40.7% 1 26.0% 32.70% 20.99% _ 33% 25% RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the lot line adjustment between properties, subject to the applicants' submission of executed 10 -foot drainage and utility easements. ATTACHMENTS Location Map Applicant's narrative Survey of properties: Existing Survey of properties: Proposed Engineer's Memo S:1 I— ingft..ing M.Uppr— ti ... \2019 CasesQ- 0122425 M—y SIt d\PC M—d- L L DESIGN - BUILD - LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE 15119 Minnetonka Boulevard Minnetonka, Minnesota 55345 Telephone 952 475 1229 Facsimile 952 475 1667 www.kslandarch.com City of Shorewood 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, MN 55331 November 1, 2019 RE: 22425 MURRAY ST. PLAT WRITTEN NARATIVE Dear Marie Darling: = �• !w The landowner, James Quandt, wishes to adjust the property line of his parcels. Our company, Keenan & Sveiven, was hired by Mr. Quandt to design a new landscape for his home. Upon discovery of the City's hardscape requirements and the existing non - conforming landscape, Mr. Quandt was advised to replat his parcels to bring them up to code. The proposed landscape for Parcel 2, where the residence is located, allows the parcel to comply with the hardcover regulations, including the additional shoreland setback regulations. A description of the existing parcels is as follows: PROPERTY DESCRIPTION PARCEL 1: That part of Lot 9D, Auditor's Subdivision No. 135, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing 150 feet south of - measured parallel with the east line of said lot - a point of 200 feet West of the northeast corner of Lot 90; thence West parallel with the north line Thereof, 170 feet; thence southwesterly to a point in the westerly line thereof distant 318 feet southeasterly from the northwest corner of said lot; thence southerly along the westerly line thereof to the intersection with a line drawn parallel to the north line of said lot 90 and 371.5 feet south of the northeast corner of said lot 90; thence East along said parallel line to a point 120 feet west of the east line of said lot 90; thence north parallel with the east line of said lot 90 to the intersection with a line drawn parallel to the north line of said lot 90 and 200.17 feet south of said north line; thence west on said parallel line, 80 feet; thence north to the point of beginning. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION PARCEL 2: That part of Lot 90, Auditor's Subdivision No. follows: 135, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as Beginning at a point on the east line of said Lat 90, which point is 371.5 feet south of the northeast corner of said Lot 90; thence north along the east line of said Lot 90 a distance of 371.5 feet to the north line of said Lot 90; thence west along the north line of said Lot 90 a distance of 20 feet; thence south parallel with the east line of said Lot 90 a distance of 200.17 feet; thence west parallel with the north line of said Lot 90 o distance of 100 feet; thence south parallel with the east line of said Lot 90 to the intersection with a line drawn parallel to the north line of said Lot 90 and 371.5 feet south of the northeast comer of Lot 90; thence east along said parallel line to the east line of said Lot 90 a distance of 120 feet to the point of beginning. The proposed property descriptions are as follows: PROPOSED PROPERTY DESCRIPTION PARCEL 1: That part of Lot 90, Auditor's Subdivision No. 135, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing 150 feet south of - measured parallel with the east line of said lot - a point of 200 feet West of the northeast corner of Lot 90; thence West parallel with the north line Thereof, 170 feet; thence southwesterly to a point in the westerly line thereof distant 318 feet southeasterly from the northwest corner of said lot; thence southerly along the westerly line thereof to the intersection with a line drawn parallel to the north line of said lot 90 and 371.5 feet south of the northeast corner of said lot 90; thence East along said parallel line to a point 200 feet west of the east line of said lot 90; thence north parallel with the east line of said lot 90 to the point of beginning. PROPOSED PROPERTY DESCRIPTION PARCEL 2: That part of Lot 90, Auditor's Subdivision No. 135, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at a point on the east line of said Lot 90, which point is 371.5 feet south of the northeast corner of said Lot 90; thence north along the east line of said Lot 90 a distance of 371.5 feet to the north line of said Lot 90; thence west along the north line of said Lot 90 a distance of 20 feet; thence south parallel with the east line of said Lot 90 a distance of 200.17 feet; thence west parallel with the north line of said Lot 90 a distance of 180 feet; thence south parallel with the east line of said Lot 90 to the intersection with o line drown parallel to the north line of said Lot 90 and 371 .5 feet south of the northeast corner of Lot 90; thence east along said parallel line to the east line of said Lot 90 a distance of 2D0 feet to the paint of beginning. Sincerely, KEEN SVEIVEN INC. Kevo Keenan President � x m � I uo,�anoa., �xa fiwa a +a,a ma,oaal ,aa.a .aF av� p noV�eo!uv9wov Ri iie 'Y �..,'. F+ � � O I trm PsYiq puv yvduwv Ri u,4xa ue R9 Payvlw,y .,�! uvitl w %Puu p J 41 v pue Pen+asgq y� � d � +a43 a wa+I wv umoyc se i G}n !!v ;o uPI}mv ayy - u N � g6av, �'�I) in sivawasva Fuv ,vF apvw so y +pas ory- tl 6u pl! lvV puv fiu y' j g I o} Pa,nsww am uoisuawip 6yIPXn9 Bu��i° xa IN - 6 'SV3Y1 00'09t Mato 8t.68N l a'YBPt 9 - •� "- lrs+ mseaa� I j m_ i xs "s 15 E55'Dl Mal .,soP y I � I ` "" I i I I�.t i5 CK� 6 S FS N .IlvMnaiauuiol. Y yy y - Eool �5 Z9G 1oa0 ! ,Bon CI � 1 1 � s, r � � d5 SO4 = alivd�rodBieuougj .! iS 609 s >6oao0 paysvleN 35va3rtoa IZZ i5 zOt'6z = -1v 101 J I 9x5oC yy � e _ P V� fz• ti� 6�• � nza L %173pinflF.iP'dS- 33d9�b'JTOI u � amp I 11 I P� `+�� aafiaq to ta!ad ayl at {aa, �! ,p aaypyaP 1� ( /.^ � Y 3 ! .ova I I I } N 0 Voio 4 oa 1>auay1 j806 iol Fo ,aa,o > °waaya.,aa _ 6 lrac leaf S'!CE pua O6 iol Pos W aui d r 7� qap II II ° (tl' y} oy1 vi lanwPd ymmP apl o wlm ,+wipap, >1yI � �� `lt� `� I r II f �m n ea Pi a iai wpa iP aul isoa ay; v1M sLCa I I pd 4inoa aPUaVI iwl OEl to a >uvts.P vp06 rr .. enw 1 l P c ;o vy,i V1 +ou eye yl!m (ailvmd lsam w !1 4, eu�iaoe lapa °loos Vlio yirovyl lal OZ aM avwyP /( . - I sl'rcoz� W 00 iol 4l 6uo{o 1c .. ..... .. .. .. ..... . agog 1p rou pla Wal 9 Kt s p a isP o O6 .1a1 Poc au.J tts Vi�BUgv 4YVU awaV1 'A6 lv { y y ,ou o v+vv a � v aw la ylvvs ieal s tC£ a ;u oa 4a Fc 4m { Ofi '. ew, .: vav� eoeo,� "eesm nlgF so peg +vssp piossu,uW RiunoS Vd>uVaN wu, ^" , ,urozc sa,sr.e i 'sit 'aN w,s n,Pans c+oiPnv Os >vl FO iYOd ioyy a smN '..... zemtY, •. ,.. `ND[[JiH5 §3U',tli�:158d w q rov, o O ,:sroM c 1 w N 'SV3W iDO rah t mt,,'PZa,O-M,taw ; m b E I� ^ u I� oYtroroiM g (P - = °o i aiCCm� N .scrzN 0£ZSI SIN ° sc, px Np9N pe�q{+asul �° p e'o i 'm tm do awn uvif p ` • ivawnuory 11aS U a �,�R � 4 3uewvuoW uv., punoj � ®22 1pYaezPl � Bp1yo� CyIiB H3 -ouo- . Y' a�,� i S auatona3 loM to dol MLO OO6a ?' v{io a 3 4,p to ovl w °o (ry 6K u uoivn m -pi.3 0006• IaM 6VIV O ;vy +vP V�oB ;• {qM 6u uv1a6 ,agwy :. _, ";: epy vW 6 � elod +Bmvd m 1 uz,w� dN3e�'d" t Ipr {I6 �'„w I f A33� NI 3"1Y�S aB ot Oz 0 � kR z aP, vx pNw p w m 00*0, i z 'as Ym m u; vsxuu met.68S Yc,o 1 3 321 1 5 A v' j 8 n N n Z M13H 3 VN S,.LN31"1� 3 P Ll n ...............w.__.m.. :uo4 A3AmnS NOWUNOO ONUSIX3 - . -. -. -. - --..- .: - — _ _ - __._.. .... ..... - - - -- -- --- -..... _.... n O rn C e IG a M m < M o cc C7 0 I CTS S Lu cs� VJ 0 I I . I u x w g 9 O w � s � svary < 4 m) O) ir i I I i I � I / / / r gg 4 Yi] 3� _ � a �m M a- Kt AL Y RYar" $ 8 R E u 3 « $Ye Y 85a it W ry e a q « e° F 6 3 k g S H'i x xt d s s' %-' ke ERRkFSP g %8pN Q ' ' V lK EW „u,6 r gg 4 Yi] 3� _ � a �m M a- Kt AL Y RYar" $ 8 R E u 3 « $Ye Y 85a it W ry e a q « e° F 6 3 To: Marie Darling, AICP, Planning Director From: Alyson Fauske, PE (MN), City Engineer Date: November 14, 2019 Re: 22425 Murray Street- Subdivision /Lot Combination Upon review of the "Administrative Lot Split" exhibit prepared by W. Brown Land Surveying, Inc. dated October 30, 2019 1 offer the following comments and recommendations: Utilities 2 0 Based on the city's as -built records there aren't any public utilities within the proposed lot line z adjustments. The applicant should place a "Gopher State One Call" for private utility locates (eg. M gas, electric). If any private utilities lie within the proposed lot line adjustment the utility must be relocated or the appropriate easement granted over the utility. C) Easements M Ten -foot wide perimeter public drainage and utility easements must be granted for Parcels 1 and I w ID v M W H: W W c W X n 2. G1Group Data \MunicipaRClients - Cities - Counties\ Shorewood \Development \Subdivisions\22425 Murray St (WSB 19234 - 000)\20191114 memo AF to MD_22425 Murray St.docx