Loading...
081684 CC SP Min e CITY OF SHOREWOOD SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING THURSDAY, AUGUST 16, 1984 COUNCIL CHAMBERS 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD 7:00 PM MINUTES CALL TO ORDER The Special meeting of the Shorewood City Council was called to order by Mayor Rascop at 7:00 PM, August 16, 1984. ROLL CALL Present: Mayor Rascop and Councilmembers Haugen,. Shaw, Stover and Gagne. Staff: Attorney Larson and Clerk Kennelly (Larson was excused at 8:15) WATER POLICY DISCUSSION Councilmembers Stover began the discussion by listing the types of water supplies available, 1. Individual Wells 2. Central Wells 3. Total municipal water system 4It Gagne commented on his concerns of non-payment of assessments that may come from a slump in the building market. Attorney Larson listed various way to ensure payment of specials and operating costs to protect the city financially. This insurance could be obtained through developemnt contracts or letters of credit for portions of the assessments. Developer Robert Mason, conferred with City of Minnetonka's Engineer in referenceLo suppying water to ghorewood from their system. Don Ausmus did not feel that Minnetonka would supply Shorewood with water unless they had a plan for a water system in effect and that Minnetonka would not expand their system to service Shorewood. Gagne felt the private wells should be the City water policy, then determine how to best handle the exisi tng wells. Stover stated, she feels the residents do not want a municipal water system. Haugen addressed the fact that the City has wells, and what are we going to do wi th them. Without a policy this cannot be determined. Rascop felt the operating costs should not be levied to the City residents, the well ~houl~ become self-sufficient. The larger the watered system the more cost efficient they become. e e SPECIAL COUNCIL MINUTES THURSDAY, AUGUST 16, 1984 Page Two Council directed questions to developers on building time tables and the effect the past recession had on their building market. Stover presented figures on numbers on connections needed to meet a break even point on central wells for operating and maintenance cost, estimating each well having a $10,000 yearly cost of operation and maintenance. Gagne felt the City should not take the liability on by bonding for water projects, but the developers should be responsible for the total cost. Shaw felt the developer should retain the well until they are at a break-even point. Discussion continued. Stover read her proposed policy statement as a motion, Gagne seconded, for Qlscussion. Haugen requested legal opinion on the statement prior to voting on it. Council recessed to obtain a legal opinion (by phone) from ~ttorney Larson who no longer was present at the meeting. 8:55-9:05 PM RESOLUTION #51-84 WATER POLICY (Motion to follow as attachment) e Rascop felt this motion did not address the existing well expenses. Council directed staff to review all existing Ordinances and Resolu- tions, and Contracts currently in effect, and make a recommendation as how to solve the cost overruns on existing wells. Administrator is to set up an "Assessment Policy" meeting. ADJOURNMENT Shaw moved, seconded by Haugen, to adjourn at 9:20 PM. Motion carried. Respectfully submitted, Sandra L. Kennelly City Clerk e e WATER POLICY MOTION The Citizens of Shorewood will obtain water by means of individual private wells or privately owned community wells until the Citizens demand municipal water or if the private supply is threatened by shortage or contamination and when the City can economically afford to provide municipal water. This policy is not intended to prohibit the purchase of water from existing municipal facilities at the resident's request. e e