Loading...
011386 CC Reg Min OITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MONDAY, JANUARY 1~, 1986 COUNCIL CHAMBERS 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD 7:30 P.M. . M I NUT E S CALL TO ORDER Mayor Rascop called the Regular Council meeting of Monday, January 14, 1986 to order at 7:30 P.M. in the City Hall Council Chambers. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE AND PRAYER Mayor Rascop opened the meeting with the Pledge of Allegiance and a prayer. ROLL CALL Present: Mayor Rascop, Councilmembers Haugen, Stover, Gagne and Shaw (8:05) Staff: Attorney Froberg, Engineer Norton, Administrator Vogt, Planner Nielsen and Deputy Clerk Niccum APPROVAL OF MINUTES . Stover moved, seconded by Gagne, to approve the minutes of December 16, 1985 as written. Motion carr~ed - 4 ayes. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR none PLANNING COMMISSSION REPORT Stover called the Counci1s attention to the fact that the Planning Commission minutes are in the Council packet. She did mention the 120 day extension of the Interim Zoning Ordinance. PARK COMMISSION REPORT ~~E!~~_Jake!=~!!ea~~ fOE-~~~~~in~_Sk~!in~_Ri~~~ Gagne moved, Stover seconded, to approve mileage for Martey Jakel when he makes special trips to check on skating rinks, not to exceed 21i a mile or 30 miles a week. Motion carried unanimously. Snowmobile Ordinance . Park Commissioners Kooi and Jakel were present to review the Park Commission's decision and the recent history of the Snowmobile Ordinance. Gagne moved to accept the Park Commission suggestions. Stover seconded for purposes of discussion. REGULAR COUNCIL MINUTES MONDAY, JANUARY 13, 1986 page two . ------------------------------------------- PARK COMMISSION REPORT - Snowmobile Ordinance - continued . Haugen said she has received several complaints at her home. She lS-not happy with the idea of reviewing the Snowmobile Ordinance in September which is too close to the season, she would prefer that it be done now. Park Commissioner Kpoi explained this was the reason she voted agamst-ilie morron:---- Stover had two questions after reading the Park Commission min~ utes:-- Is the trail that heavily traveled that 50 snowmobiles would pass within three hours? How can control be excercised? Jeff Hanson, President of the "Southwest Trail Association", told Stover that he-was-the one-who-counted the-50 snowmobiles~ He was grooming the trail and counted them between 4:00 and 7:00 P.M. He said one reason the trail is so heavily traveled is because it is the only close access to Lake Minnetonka. The next closest access involves traveling to St. Boni and coming down "Six Mile Creek". He also said they are trying to meet with SLMPSD to try to work out some type of control. Bill Kullberg-Mound said he has put up 7 or 8 speed limit signs, marked-the-corridor, and put up rope and reflector tape to control traffic in the complaintant's area. He also said he plans to patrol the area himself. Mike Jurgeons of Shorewood said he and a friend went out to the trail-on-Friday-from-approximately 3:00 to 6:00 P.M. and clocked speed using two-way radios. Most snowmobiles went 25 m.p.h. or less, but there were a few "hot-doggers". Bill Kullberg said the trails are more heavily used before the Iake-freezes~ Gordon Christiansen - 26190 Birch Bluff Road said this is a "city/ country" area and thats why people like to live in Shorewood. They can enjoy the outside sports. He is impressed by the Clubs and hopes the trail will be allowed to remain. John Arnst-Teal Circle repeated his complaint, referring to 3:00 A.M. traffic and the noise. He said its like someone is having a party next door. Mayor Rascop asked Mr. Arnst how far away he is from the lake entrance~~e answered about 60 feet. ~E~_~E~st said the Ordinance is vague and the police say they can't enforce it. He referred to Ordinance 59 Subd. 5 "At a rate of speed greater than reasonable or proper under all the surrounding circumstances" and Subd. 9 "In a manner so as to create a loud, unnecessary or unusual noise which annoys or !nteE!~Ees_wit~_!~~ peace and quiet of other persons." . REGULAR COUNCIL MINUTES MONDAY, JANUARY 13, 1986 page three . PARK COMMISSION REPORT - Snowmobile Ordinance - continued Attorney Froberg referred to Ordinance 97, an amendment to Ordlnance-5~suggesting that in Subdivision 5 a period be placed after 20 m.p.h., making it clearer that 20 m.p.h. is the top speed-allowed in the entire City. Jeff Hanson said Mr. Arnst's house is the closest house to the traIl~-that they realize he has a problem, and have done every- thing in their power to correct it. Haugen asked if they had just done something about the problem~He-said as soon as they became aware of the problem they acted upon it. Haugen said she had been informed that the Snowmobile Club has-been told about this problem each year for the last 3 years. Jeff Hanson said the Club has not been notified of the problem untll-thIs-year. He also said the new law reads 10 m.p.h. on streets, 35 m.p.h. on trails. He thought if the trails were posted at 20 m.p.h. it might solve the problem. Gagne's motion, seconded by Stover, was to keep the trail open for now, but to amend the Ordinance to read 10 m.p.h. on streets and 20 m.p,.h. maximum speed on trails and elsewhere in the City, no motorized vehicles in parks, and that the Ordinance be reviewed in September by the Park Commission. Motion carried by Roll Call Vote - 4 ayes. . Stover asked if the hours could be restricted on the Railroad Corridor only. Staff was directed to prepare the Ordinance Amendment and bring before the Park Commission for recommendation with the above provision added by Stover. "New Park" named "Silverwood Park" RESOLUTION NO. 1-86 Gagne moved, Stover seconded, to name the new park in the southeast section of the City, off Covington Road, "Silverwood Park". Motion carried by Roll Call Vote - 4 ayes. Acceptance of Pedestrian Access to SIlver-lake----------------------- RESOLUTION NO. 2-86 Gagne moved, Stover seconded, to accept Near Mountain's offer of a 20' easement to Silver Lake (this easement runs across Silver Ridge property) to be used for Park purposes as a pedestrian access to Silver Lake. Motion carried by Roll Call Vote - 4 ayes. . ~Epr~~al_of ~ar~_~~!~~!~~_~~~~~~~~~ Gagne moved, Haugen seconded, to approve the purchase of 2 vacuum cleaners, shovels, and a radio to be used for musical skating - all to be used in the warming houses. Motion carried unanimously - 4 ayes. REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MONDAY, JANUARY 13, 1986 page four . CONSENT AGENDA ~ig~~ette~ice~~~~ 1. Minnetonka Country Club 2. Plaza Tom Thumb 3. Shorewood I.C.O. 4. American Legion Post #259 5. Skipperette 6. Village Pump 7. Driskill's Super Valu 8. Howard's Point Marina Gagne moved, Haugen seconded, to approve the issues listed on the Consent Agenda as presented. Motion carried unanimously - 5 ayes. 1986 A~~OINTMENT~ RESOLUTION NO. 3-86 *see attached PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT Gene Rosenthal - 20095 Excelsior Blvd -----------5405st:-A:lbansBay Road _53~5 S~~!~~~~_Ba~Roa~ . Gene Rosenthal and Dick larsen and Mike Wirtanen of Wirtanen, Clark and Larsen, Architects were present to propose a Comprehensive Plan Amendment. They want to change to zoning from the current zoning of R-2A (single and two family residential) to R-C (Residential Commercial). They are proposing 4-two story professional office buildings with balconies and residential character to rrG in with the neighborhood. The buildings would be from 9,000 to 14,000 square feet in size. They feel that a professional office building would have the following advantages over duplexes: access onto Highway 7 instead of generattng:more traffic problems on Excelsior Blvd. better construction quality and better upkeep less activity - 8:00-5:00 and no week ends adults only better and more attractive buffer to Highway 7 better landspap~ng low profile lighting all traffic in front of buildings . less likely to decrease neighborhood property values, thus benefi ting. taxpayers. REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MONDAY, JANUARY 13, 1986 page five . PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT - Rosenthal - continued Mr. Rosenthal asked Planner Nielsen if he would need the neighbor's approval to build duplexes. Planner Nielsen said no, but he would need subdivision approval. Mr. Rosenthal presented a letter to the Council from Ellie Schwaba, a Minnetonka Real Estate Broker, stating her opinion on a townhome development vs. an office complex in the proposed location. She responded: regarding a professional office building....... the value of homes along Excelsior Blvd. should not change if there is no significant change in traffic patterns throughout the neighborhood, a buffer is provided between the residential and commercial area, and the composition of the neighborhood is not broken up. She felt Rosenthal's proposal m~t these requirements. regarding townhouse development....... . in developing townhomes he would be looking at an access directly onto Excelsior Blvd (necessary for residences) which would mean a greater volume of traffic into the neighborhood. A lower quabi"ty--ofconstructionwGuld have to be used compared to what would be used for offices. A possible decline in future upkeep depending on ownership would be possible with townhomes. There would be less of a visual screen required for townhomes and a lower appraised value would be placed on townhomes as compared to the surrounding homes. In conclusion it was her opinion that the neighborhood along Excel- sior Blvd. would be better off having a quality office complex in the proposed development area than a townhome development. Mr. Rosenthal said he'd been denied approval by the Planning Com- mission because the neighborhood had been promised that no Commercial Development would go in north of Highway 7 across from Trivesco. He asked the City Clerk for a copy of the minutes specifying this and she was unable to find anything in writing. He feels that he should be allowed the same prllivileges as Trivesco. He said the whole plan is based on whether or not an interchange onto Highway 7 providing access both east and west will be possible. He also mentioned that he is aware of the fact that they cannot create any additional runoff according to Minnehaha Watershed. Water will be provided by a private well, and there will be a control structure to both meter water and filter out solid materials. . REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MONDAY, JANUARY 13, 1986 page six . PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT - Rosenthal - continued ---------------------------------------------- Mayor Rascop asked if: 1. a market study had been done? 2. a traffic study had been done? 3. Metro Waste Control had been contacted regarding sewer connection? Rosenthal said no, he hadn't realized that they were requested, but that they could be done. Stover pointed out that the Planning Commission had spent a great deal of time at two meetings discussing traffic, sewer, drainage, etc" and a market study had been requested at both of these meetings. Mayor Rascop pointed out the September 26th Planning Commission minutes requesting a traffic study. Several of the neighbors, Peter Boyer, Todd Hendries, Jim Waldo, Jim Burkeholder, Larry Buesgens and others, were present to again voice their concerns regarding the proposed project. . Two new issues mentioned were the fear of having the church parking lot used as access to Excelsior Blvd and how traffic would be limited on St. Albans's Bay Road. Engineer Norton pointed out that sewer will be available, that the storm sewer runoff would have to be approved by Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, and that regarding fire protection, they may want to seek input from the Fire Marshall, Mark Kuhnly. Haugen asked if there would be basements and was told no, they would be two story buildings on slabs. Planner Nielsen pointed out that the Radde property, the westerly most parcel, does exist as two parcels. Gagne mentioned that it could take months or longer to decide on the intersection. Gagne also pointed out to the neighbors that Councils do change and that their opinions and decisions could change with them especially with regards to commercial development in this area. Haugen said she finds it hard to change the zoning when the two studies requested were not provided. . Stover moved, Shaw seconded, that the Comprehensive Plan not be changed and that the City Attorney draw a finding of facts Resolution. Motion for denial carried by Roll Call Vote - 5 ayes. REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MONDAY, JANUARY 13, 1986 page seven . COVINGTON VINE RIDGE FINAL PLAT Planner Nielsen said a letter of credit for over $800,000 to cover Street and Utility Works has been received. '.... ........... ......J....L J Gagne moved, Haugen seconded, to dir~ct staff to draw a resolution approving the Final Plat and Development Agreement, to be approved, if possible, at the meeting of January 27, and to approve the issuance of one (1) building permit. Motion carried by Roll Call Vote-5 ayes. Engineer Norton pointed out that sometime in the future Covington Road will be cut down. Covington Vine Ridge said this would have little effect on their project. It was suggested that the fact that this will be done and that Covington Vine Ridge is aware of it, be put into the Development Agreement. SIMPLE SUBDIVISION ~~~EY 2~~~lIIv~n-~265 Mi!l S!. RESOLUTION NO. 4-86 Mr. O'Sullivan was present to request a simple subdivision of his property into 2 lots; Lot A, 45,302 square feet, 163'x 265', with -ape-nden--c:it,---an4-bot-B, 48,352 square feet, 155' x 357', the lot with the existing house on it. . The location of the driveway also came up for discussion. Planner Nielsen asked that the new lot have adequate turnaround. Mr. O'Sullivan agreed to this. Landscaping, a buffer, and the placement of the building were all suggested as various ways to prevent people from driving down Apple Road and coming across to land on his property. Shaw moved, Gagne seconded, to approve the Simple Subdivision contingent upon the following Planner's recommendations: . 1. The applicant must submit an up-to-date title opinion for the City Attorney's review and approval. 2. New legal descriptions for the two lots must be submitted for inclusion in the Council's resolution. 3. The request should be subject to review and approval by the Hennepin County Engineer. 4. The applicant must provide drainage and utility easements 10' on each side of each side and rear lot line. 5. Prior to release of the resolution approving the request, the applicant must pay the $500 park dedication fee (credit is given for the lot with the house on it). 6. The applicant must record the division with Hennepin County within 30 days of the receipt of the resolution. Failure to do so will void the City's approval. Motion carried by Roll Call Vote - 5 ayes. REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING JANUARY 10, 1986 page eight . CHRISTMAS LAKE ACCESS DISCUSSION Charles Dayton, Attorney for the Christmas Lake Association, appeared before the Council requesting that they sign a proposed agreement between the Department of Natural Resources, The City of Shorewood, and the Christmas Lake Association. He said there is a timing problem because the agreement must be signed by Thursday, January 16th, so that the condemnation on the Brooks property will be dismissed. He said if the City does not approve the plans by May 1st, 1986, the property will be given to the State as of that date. He said the roadway r.o.w. is in the process of being resolved with Interstudy, if the easement is not obtained, the agreement will fail. Stover asked Attorney Froberg if the access would be a park? He said yes, under all park rules and regulations. Carol Anderson said it doesn't mention maintenance of the road in the agreement. Her husband is a doctor and needs access. Stover asked if the State has anything to say about the maintenance level, and was told maintenance would be on the same level as other City streets. . Mr. Rosen, Mrs. Brook's Attorney, said the proposed piece of land is landlocked, no easement has been granted and the possibility may not even exist. He said the Attorney General had stated that the agreement will not be signed unless Interstudy presents proof pro- viding easement. Jean McGee of Interstudy said the Board is considering the easement but no meeting is scheduled before January 16th. The Council asked Attorney Froberg's opinion. He said he was com- pelled to caution them against signing the agreement. He felt it was premature and improper'at this time. He felt the Homeowners could deal directly with the State without involving the City. The City could review the State plans and it would be operated and regulated by the State. Shaw said if the City is involved they can at least speak on the issues, which is better than being an innocent victim. Attorney Froberg said no matter who owns it, the State will operate it the way they want to. Shaw said if it is under City rule, we can deal with our own Police Department. . REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MONDAY, JANUARY 13, 1986 page nine . CHRISTMAS LAKE ACCESS DISCUSSION - continued Attorney Rosen, Mrs. Brook's Attorney, asked why the City is involved? Why not just give the land to the State and resolve the issue. Mrs. Brooks has had it with her property being tied up and would like to see the issue resolved, one way or the other. Dr. James has supported the agreement because - for example - he prefers a 10:00 p.m. to a 12:00 p.m. curfew - her prefers City control. Robert Fayfield prefers to give the property to the City. Mayor Rascop informed the citizens he supports their action. Stover moved, Gagne seconded for purposes of discussion, that the Mayor is authorized to sign the agreement in substantially the present form, with such changes and adjustments as may be agreed to by the parties, without changes which would materially affect the rights and obligations of the City. Motion carried by Roll Call Vote - 4 ayes - 1 nay (Haugen) ATTORNEY'S REPORT . Naegele Litigation Attorney Froberg received a call from Naegele's Attorney's January 13, 1986 promising an answer by tomorrow (today). None has been received. ~~~!!~ Prop~rt;z Attorney Froberg talked to Murfin's Attorney and informed him the City had determined to remove the pipe up to the service, that the Abstract is being returned, and that the sale is off. He also met with the Fire Marshall. The tank violations are a misdemeanor, because Mr. Murfin is in another state and not a resident of Minnesota, he can not be served under a criminal action unless he is extradited. The City can pursue a Civil Action, placing the property in litigation. No one would want to by a piece of property that is in litigation. Stover asked if action should be taken against Murfin or I.C.O. Attorney Froberg said both. Haugen asked if it would be to the City's advantage to do this? Froberg said yes. . Haugen moved, Gagne seconded, that the City Attorney, City Administrator, and Mayor draft a letter to Mr. Murfin stating if the tanks are not removed soon, the City will take action. The letter to be signed by Mayor Rascop. Motion carried unanimously. REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MONDAY, JANUARY 13, 1986 page ten . ENGINEER'S REPORT St~!~~Rep~~!_=_So~!~ea~!_~~ea_~runk_~ater_~;Z~!~~ Engineer Norton presented visual aids showing watermain put in as part of the Waterford project, watermain put in as part of the Covington Vine Ridge project, the point where it is hooked into Minnetonka water, the proposed continuation of the Waterford and Covington Vine Ridge lines, forming a loop, and the proposed future water line running fro~ the proposed tower site included in the comprehensive water report and where we are at currently with the watermain, and the proposed location of the well, pumphouse, and reservior. He said if we were closer to the pro- posed tower site it could be that we could go ahead with the pumphouse without the need of hydropneumatic tanks. We are not close enough, the proposed line at this time would go through undeveloped properties. The tower itself would add probably half a million dollars. Mayor Rascop asked what the savings would be by not having the pressure tank if the tower was put in right away? Would it be a couple years interest on half a million dollars? . Engineer Norton said he doesn't have an answer to that right now, the cost of the tank, process piping and process work, probably in the $50,000 range. Stover asked what Engineer Norton's projection is on how long it will be before the tower will be in existence. Engineer Norton said the tower site and development hinge on mar- keting the property and the corridor study, probably 3-5 wears. Stover asked where the tower is to be located. Engineer Norton said that the location was chosen in the Comprehensive Water Plan before Trivesco ever came into existence. The location is on State Park property close to the cemetary. This ~its was chosen because it was the highest area. Rascop asked if there is an alternative site. Engineer Norton said they had talked to Trivesco about putting it on a piece of property that is not used when the detached frontage road is brought into the collector street. The tower would have to be taller but the cost would not be significant when you are talking about half a million dollars for the tower. . To get to the tower site now, easements would have to acquired and a water line run over several hundred feet of undeveloped property that is not yet graded. . REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MONDAY, JANUARY 10, 1986 page eleven ~~QINEE~~~_~~~OR~_- S~ut~eas!~Area~~~nk_~at~~_Sy~!~~_=~on!!~~ed Rascop asked Administrator Vogt to check with bonding consultants to see what 5 years interest on half a million dollars would be. Engineer Norton said he has split the deepwell project into three phases: 1. Deepwell 2. Pumphouse and reservior basin 3. Watermain This would mean 3 separate contacts and three separate contactors. The schedule for approval date and authorization for bids would be: Ja~uarY_~Ith_Co~ncil Me~ti~g - Pumphouse and reservior ~ebr~ar~_lOth_Counci~~~et!~g - Deep well Watermain . Rascop asked where we are in the development contract with Near Mountain? Planner Nielsen said they are submitting their final plan so they can be presented at the February 10th Council meeting. Engineer Norton showed plans for a 32' x 50' pumphouse that would be located in "Silverwood Park". This building left some storage space for park use. He showed a couple architectual drawings, a "Georgian" style - $20,000 extra, and a "Colonial" style - $35,000 extra. Rascop said interest rates are good right now, and it might be a good time to do things. The 300,000 gallon reservior will cost about 80~ a gallon or $240,000. A treatment tank may be necessary at some time in the future. This would be similar to the other tank but would have four compartments. A knockout panel could be put in the building so a wall could be pulled out in case a tank had to be changed. Engineer Norton said the feasibility report cost is $917,000. . The Council asked him to figure the cost of running the watermain and putting up the tower and pumphouse without using the hydro- pneumatic tank. REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MONDAY; JANUARY 13, 1986 page twelve . ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT Task Force on Lake Minnetonka Update The DNR indicated that they had all the sites chosen. All the sites except one, Orchard Park site in Tonka Bay, were rated poor, and the Orchard Park site was rated fair. Dan has written a letter regarding the Shorewood sites. He felt that the main reason for the meeting was to see if any of the Cities had any other sites to offer, none did. ~ea!!~g be!~!~Bu!ea~-9!_~~~!~!!~~ Se!~!~~~ A written brief will be submitted no later than the 27th of January, after that the mediator in conjunction with the Director of Med- iation Services will make a decision on whether or not Howard Stark is a supervisor or not under the statute in the Public Works Department. Blood Litigation The City has been repaid and the Blood property has been sold. SLMPSD/Shorewood Public Works Department - Combining of Radio Bands . Administrator Vogt said that Public Works Director Zdrazil would like to have SLMPSD on their radio band, it is to the City's advantage during snow storms. Mayor Rascop said it would also save the City money, as there is now a charge for messages going through the tower. Attorney Froberg said if Shorewood's license has sufficient mobiles licensed it would not be a problem. Shorewood has 23 licensed and is using 6.. Council asked Administrator Vogt to hold off on this for a short period of time. ~~!gh!_Restrict!~~Q!~!~anc~ Dan asked Council if 30 days notification, with the Ordinance going into effect on the 1st of March was agreeable. Council agreed. . Garb~g~-2!~!~~~~~ The Garbage Ordinance is in its final form and still has to be passed to go into effect March 1st, the same date as the Weight Restriction Ordinance. Final draft to be presented at the January 27 Council meeting. REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MONDAY, JANUARY 1~, 1986 page thirteen . ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT - continued Wat~E!~E~ Fatal!!~ Papers were served late this afternoon (1/13/86) on the lawsuit concerning a fatality that occurred in December of 1984. Attorney Froberg said we will contact our insurance carrier, inform them when we were served, provide them with a copy of the Summons and Complaint and request that they will defend us and get back to us immediately confirming that they have accepted our defense and are interposing an answer. MAYOR'S REPORT Task Force on Lake Minnetonka Access Our primary Met Council person, Arnie Stefferud,will no longer be handling the Task Force. The Mayor will know more after the next meeting. . Police Buil~in~ Gagne reported that he had attended the meeting, and that the first order of the day had been the announcement that as long as Shorewood is not involved at this time, Excelsior will be the Chairman and Greenwood will be the Vice-Chairman. He referred to the price of the building, asking if the original quote for the building was not $250,000 to $300,000? He said it is now being said it will lucky if the cost can be held at $400,000. Stover asked if this included the land and was told no. He said Shorewood's list of requests had been presented and no replies have been received yet. Rascop said the way it is now set up Shorewood will pay ~ the cost of the Police buil@ing and still only have t the vote. Shaw said the other cities are not giving Shorewood any courtesy or respect. There is no longer the "Joint Powers", it is only a contract. Haugen said it has been Shorewood's dream for years to have a four-city merger. Now there is nothing but distrust. The other cit~es do not even have the courtesy to reply. If they want us to continue, they will have to give us what we need. . Stover said we cannot have a major portion of our budget out of our control. She suggested either having a 5 year renewable contract or a vote to coincide with our contribut4~n~ None of the Council are unhappy with the Police Department, only the way things are being handled. REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MONDAY, JANUARY 13, 1986 page fourteen . MAYOR'S REPORT - Police Building - continued Stover said that Shorewood is destined to grow over the years, whereas the other three cities will probably remain the same size, that perhaps they can't look at the future as we do. Shaw moved, Gagne seconded, to have the City Attorney draw a Resolution for Council approval to present to the other involved parties stating Council's intent to withdraw from the SLMPSD at the end of the current Contract, December 31, 1987. Motion carried by Roll Call Vote - 3 ayes - 2 nays (Rascop and Haugen). APPROVAL OF CLAIMS AND ADJOURNMENT Gagne moved, Shaw seconded, to adjourn the Council meeting of January 13, 1986 at 12:57 P.M. subject to approval of claims for payment. Motion carried - 5 ayes. General Fund - Acct. #00166-02 General Fund - Computer System Checks # 31592-31630 $38,197.80 Checks # 200035-200067 $11,666.64 Total Gen. Fund $49 'c864. 44 Checks # 4298 - 4328 $35,872.93 . ~iquor Fund - Acct. #00174 Respectfully submitted, Susan Niccum Deputy Clerk Robert Rascop Mayor .