Loading...
091304 CC Reg Min \v . . . CITY OF SHOREWOOD CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 13, 2004 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7:00 P.M. MINUTES 1. CONVENE CITY COUNCIL MEETING Mayor Love called the meeting to order at 7:00 P.M. A. Roll Call Present: Mayor Love; Councilmembers Garfunkel, Lizee, Turgeon, and Zerby; Administrator Dawson; Attorney Keane (arrived 7:02 P.M.); Engineer Brown; Finance Director Burton; and Planning Director Nielsen B. Review Agenda Garfunkel moved, Lizee seconded, Approving the Agenda as presented. Motion passed 5/0. 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. City Council Regular Meeting Minutes, August 23, 2004 (Att.- Minutes) Zerby moved, Garfunkel seconded, Approving the City Council Regular Meeting Minutes of August 23, 2004, as presented. Motion passed 5/0. Attorney Keane arrived at 7:02 P.M. 3. CONSENT AGENDA Zerby moved, Turgeon seconded, Approving the Motions Contained on the Consent Agenda and Adopting the Resolutions Therein: A. Approval of the Verified Claims List B. Adopting RESOLUTION NO. 04-071, "A Resolution Making Appointment of Light Equipment Operator-Utility Operator" C. City Clerk's License Approvals 1) Adopting RESOLUTION NO. 04-072, "A Resolution Approving a Temporary Gambling License for Friends of the Southshore Center" 2) Adopting RESOLUTION NO. 04-073, "A Resolution Granting a Temporary Gambling License for Edina Care Residence" D. Accept Consultant Services Proposal for Woodhaven Well E. Adopting RESOLUTION NO. 04-074, "A Resolution Approving Amendments to Sections 4.06 to 15.01 of the By-Laws of the Shorewood Parks Foundation." F. Adopting RESOLUTION NO. 04-075, "A Resolution Accepting Bids and Awarding Contract for 2004 Bituminous Overlay Project." CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES September 13, 2004 Page 2 oflO . G. Authorizing Expenditure of Funds for City Hall Roof Replacement H. Authorizing Expenditure of Funds for 2004 Pavement Marking I. Approving a Sign Permit Request for Fitness 19, 23730 State Hwy. 7 (Shorewood Village Shopping Center) J. Approving a Sign Permit Request for South Tonka Little League, 25800 Hwy. 7 at Freeman Park K. Approving a Permit to Move a House for Ron Moore, 20585 Minnetonka Blvd. Motion passed 5/0. 4. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR There were no matters from the floor presented this evening. 5. REPORTS AND PRESENTATIONS A. Request for Comments from LMCD Resolutions regarding Six-Mile Creek (Att. - Administrator's memorandum) . Tom Skramstad, Shorewood's representative to and Chair of the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District, stated he was present this evening to hear comments from Council regarding the legislative impacts to the LMCD's jurisdiction over Six-Mile Creek. He explained that at the end of the 2004 session, the State Legislature approved an act that superseded the LMCD's prohibition of motorboats on Six-Mile Creek. He stated the LMCD was requesting comments from the 14 member cities on a model resolution for the cities as well as a proposed LMCD Board resolution on this issue. Mr. Skramstad then explained the history of the issues regarding Six-Mile Creek, as he noted some issues had been lost in the media coverage of the matter. He stated there were four property owners on Six- Mile Creek with concerns about their riparian rights to historic use of docks and boats on the Creek. He noted riparian rights were not a guarantee to dock and boat access to Lake Minnetonka simply because of historic use. Nevertheless, he stated, the LMCD had worked with these owners regarding these rights, as well as working with many agencies and water quality authorities to allow electric trolling motors on the Creek. This legislation passed in 2002. At the end of the 2004 State Legislative session, legislation was passed to reverse the jurisdiction of the LMCD due to concerns that these property owners' riparian rights were being restricted by the LMCD. Mr. Skramstad stated the LMCD had expressed great disappointment and anger regarding the LMCD Board's beliefs that the issues on Six-Mile Creek were clearly within jurisdictional rights of the LMCD. He went on to state he believed the LMCD had done a good job of regulating use of the lake over the years and he requested feedback from Council on this issue. . In response to Councilmember Zerby's question, Mr. Skramstad stated the developer of Upland Farms had not yet begun construction as the City of Minnetrista had placed a moratorium for one year to restrict development that would grant additional access to the Creek prior to sorting out the issues at hand. In response to Mayor Love's question, Mr. Skramstad stated the City of Minnetrista had been working very closely with the LMCD to bring clarification and resolution to these issues, and the City had . . . CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES September 13, 2004 Page 3 of 10 supported restricted development on the Creek. The City of Minnetrista remained committed to working out how best to plan the development process near and on the Creek. Councilmember Turgeon stated she did not like to see inconsistencies granted for a small number of property owners, and she questioned when the LMCD would assume jurisdiction over properties near and around Lake Minnetonka and its tributaries. Mr. Skramstad explained riparian rights did not guarantee docks and boats to property owners simply due to historic use in this case. He stated riparian rights granted a property owner access to the lake only. Councilmember Zerby stated he appreciated the efforts of the LMCD to act as guardians of the lake, both in and around it in the past years. He stated the LMCD had its focus on the bigger picture in this case, specifically the impacts to the water quality of the lake, as well as sediment run off issues. He stated he would be in favor of supporting the resolution presented by the LMCD wholeheartedly. Councilmember Turgeon stated she thought it helpful to have consistency found within one agency, such as the LMCD, for jurisdictional issues. She questioned why this development project was allowed to operate under different guidelines than other development projects that would also impact Lake Minnetonka. She stated she would also be in favor of supporting the resolution presented by the LMCD on this issue, and she would look to the City of Minnetrista to implement stricter ordinances than what the State would direct in this case. Mayor Love stated he would also support the model resolution, and stated the issue in dispute was a question of property owner rights. He stated in 1967 the Legislature was petitioned for special legislation to form the LMCD, which was only 1 of 2 in the entire state. He also stated uniformity of rules were important to this matter. Furthermore, he stated it seemed the most disappointing aspect was that it seemed a fair process had been followed in this case. He stated he would be in favor of supporting the resolution from the City endorsing the LMCD in this case. He went on to state he did have some concerns with the existing rights of property owners, however, in this case he thought it a travesty to allow further development up the Creek and allowing it to connect to Lake Minnetonka. Councilmember Garfunkel agreed, noting he thought it important to allow "grandparenting" of lake access through historic use. Councilmember Lizee stated she thought it important for the LMCD to consider the historic use versus the anticipated use of Lake Minnetonka when moving into the future. She stated the LMCD had been a great steward of the lake for many years, and she was afraid of the impacts from the removal of the LMCD's jurisdiction over the Creek in this case. Mayor Love stated it seemed as though Council would support a resolution promoting legislation to establish the LMCD jurisdiction be protected in this matter. He stated he did not think the resolution needed to include conditions, but if there were questionable areas, it seemed as though it would be related to the removal of riparian rights for property owners. B. Request for comments from LMCD Regarding Alcohol Licenses Mr. Skramstad explained that while the LMCD had a statutory maximum of 14 full-service liquor licenses, all but a few of the 29 charter boats on Lake Minnetonka serve some type of alcoholic beverage. The LMCD had been asked to begin the process that would result in more, and for the proponents, all boats having full service liquor licenses. He stated he was present to ask for comment from member cities regarding raising the number of charter boat liquor licenses before the LMCD would consider any action on this issue. CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES September 13, 2004 Page 4 oflO . He went on to explain the Charter Boat Association (CBA) requested the LMCD consider this action because the CBA stated it wanted to have better control over its clientele versus allowing the current situation involving "setups" to continue on charters. Mr. Slcramstad stated the CBA was a good organization and he believed it was trying to work with the LMCD in good faith on this issue. Furthermore, he stated the CBA had charters as their business and had not presented any trouble in the past. Councilmember Zerby questioned the cost of a full service liquor license from the LMCD. Mr. Slcramstad explained the three licensing classes and noted the pricing ranged from $200 annually to $1150 annually for a full-service license. Councilmember Zerby stated he thought with the possible expansion of the full-service licensing, the LMCD could potentially add $10,000 to its yearly budget. Councilmember Zerby also questioned whether the money from the licenses was put into a fund for the South Lake Minnetonka Police Department and other police jurisdictions for enforcement issues related to alcohol use on the charter boats. Mr. Slcramstad stated the money currently went into a General Fund for the LMCD for all programming, since State statutes dictated the fees collected could not exceed the cost incurred to regulate the licensed activity. Councilmember Garfunkel stated the cost to administer a beer license and the cost to administer a full service license would have to be about the same in this matter. He went on to state the CBA gained profits from this proposed action and he would like to know whether enforcement issues were related to charter boat activity. If so, it would also be interesting to note the history of the cases involving full licensed use by the charters to determine if there was any relationship between the type of licensing of the charter boat and the enforcement issues needed as a result of alcohol use. . Councilmember Zerby stated he thought the fees charged by the LMCD for these licenses were quite low, and discussions should be held regarding funding by the LMCD for enforcement on and off the water. He stated he would like to know the outcome of that discussion prior to supporting expansion of the number of full liquor licenses for the charter boats. Mayor Love stated many good points had been raised by the Council this evening for further consideration in this matter. He stated most complaints he was aware related to charter boats involved noise issues, and he requested the LMCD hold discussions regarding those issues as well. Further, he stated the Council had indicated a direction toward potentially issuing more liquor licenses, however, additional patrol costs were directly related and the Council had indicated it would like additional funding costs explored for the enforcement. He thanked Mr. Slcramstad for his time spent in conversation with the Council this evening and for his efforts on behalf of the LMCD. Mr. Slcramstad thanked the Council for its time on these issues this evening, and noted he would bring these comments back to the LMCD for further discussion. 6. PUBLIC HEARING None. 7. PARKS . A. Report on the Special Park Commission meeting of August 30, 2004 Commissioner Westerlund reported on matters considered and actions taken at the August 30, 2004, Special Meeting of the Park Commission (as detailed in the minutes of that meeting). CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES September 13, 2004 Page 5 of 10 . B. Donor Recognition Policy Engineer Brown stated the Park Commission had worked diligently and had put forth great. effort to create a Donor Recognition Policy for the City whereby substantial gifts could be donated to the City for memorial or recognition purposes within the City parks. He stated this policy provided the Commission with a challenge to begin to set regulations in place without over-defining the policy issue. He stated the proposed policy had laid out a process for donation and noted "naming" issues proved to be the biggest challenge overall for the Commission. Councilmember Turgeon questioned the progress being made regarding a "Gift Book" concept discussed previously in the donor policy process that allowed people to make financial contributions for specific physical items for park use. Engineer Brown stated more information on the book concept would be forthcoming. Mayor Love thanked the Commission for its efforts and time spent on this issue. He stated he thought the document to be very well written and demonstrated the time and effort spent in working through a policy process. He stated the donor family's often appreciated the efforts behind the policy and noted the policy reflected numerous opportunities and options for working with individuals and families for recognition or memorial purposes. Turgeon moved, Zerby seconded, Approving the Donor Recognition Policy as presented. Motion passed 5/0. . C. Freeman Park Plaza Project Administrator Dawson explained the Shorewood Parks Foundation was proposing the installation and conveyance of a picnic plaza, located to the west of Eddy Station and to the south of the play structure. He then reviewed the history of the project and progress of the proposed project to this point in time, noting that earlier this summer, the Council, Parks Foundation, and Park Commission heard from donors interested in fully funding the Foundation's proposed Freeman Park Plaza project. Plans had been submitted and reviewed with approval given by the Park Commission to proceed through the planning process for Council consideration. Administrator Dawson also stated the project was believed to be consistent with the Donor Policy approved earlier this evening, and the Foundation would be responsible for the construction of the plaza. Ken Dallman, President of the Parks Foundation, stated the Foundation had worked hard for almost a year to raise funds for this project, and it was the intent and desire of the Foundation to have the project constructed before year-end. He stated the donor group had funded the majority of the project, and a plaque would be placed to recognize a recently deceased individual within the community. He stated the project was rather costly, nearly all funds had been raised, and all parties involved did not wish to see the momentum behind the project lost. In response to Councilmember Turgeon's question, Engineer Brown stated an escrow account or letter of credit would be established to handle the financial responsibility issues associated with the project. Also, in response to Councilmember Zerby's question, Engineer Brown stated he believed the plaza project to be consistent with the Parks Master Plan. . Councilmember Turgeon stated she thought the project a nice complement to Eddy Station and would allow additional passive use in the park as well as enhancing the atmosphere associated with the concession stand and the Music in the Park series. . . . CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES September 13, 2004 Page 6 of 10 Turgeon moved, Lizee seconded, Approving the Freeman Park plaza Project proposed by the Shorewood Park Foundations, subject to the recommendations of the Park Commission and City Staff. Motion passed 5/0. Mayor Love requested Mr. Dallman share the thanks of the Council with the Foundation and Park Commission for all the effort required to bring such a project forward in such a short time. He stated the efforts of all parties involved were greatly appreciated in this case. 8. PLANNING A. Flood Plain Ordinance Amendment Director Nielsen explained the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) had advised cities that they must update their existing floodplain regulations for residents to remain eligible for flood insurance. He stated the proposed ordinance amendment would replace Chapter 1101 of the City Code, and due to its great length would be adopted by summary ordinance procedures. He went on to explain the details of the changes proposed, noting significant changes to the Code including specific activities allowed to take place in the redefined flood plain, floodway, and flood fringe. Councilmember Turgeon questioned whether residents were notified of these changes as it related to flood insurance rates for residents. Director Nielsen stated there would be no attempt personally to notify residents living within the defined flood areas, however, any persons requesting information on these areas were welcome to come to City Hall for a determination as to whether their residence was part of the flood areas designated within the proposed ordinance. Zerby moved, Garfunkel seconded, Adopting ORDINANCE NO. 405, "An Ordinance Amending Chapter 1101 of the Shorewood City Code Relating to Flood Plain Management Regulations." Motion passed 5/0. Zerby moved, Garfunkel seconded, Adopting RESOLUTION NO. 04-077, "A Resolution Approving Publication of Ordinance No. 405 by Title and Summary." Motion passed 5/0. 9. GENERAL/NEW BUSINESS A. Approval of the 2005-2009 Capital Improvement Program Administrator Dawson explained the 2005-2009 Capital Improvement Program had been prepared for Council consideration. He noted the program included the changes indicated by Council at its work session meetings this summer on the topic. Garfunkel moved, Lizee seconded, Adopting RESOLUTION NO. 04-078 "A Resolution Adopting a Capital Improvement Program for the Years 2005-2009." Motion passed 5/0. B. Approval of the 2005 Proposed Budget Finance Director Burton presented the 2005 General Fund Operating Budget for Council consideration. She noted the time line for certification with Hennepin County and noted the general approach to the proposed budget had been to restore funding to traditional levels, to address matters deferred, and to make additions that would enhance the productivity and effectiveness. She then reviewed the highlights to the budget, noting the City was not subject to levy limits for the Year 2005. However, the Council had requested the 2005 levy be limited to a 12% increase from the 2004 amount and the budget reflected that request. She also noted Shorewood's debt service payment made annually to fund the new public safety . . . CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES September 13, 2004 Page 7 of 10 building was estimated to be $496,000. She next reviewed the budget expenditure highlights in the areas related to police and fire, parks and recreation, public works and engineering, employee pay plans and benefits, information technology, document retrieval systems, and training costs to the City Council next year. Finance Director Burton also explained the truth-in-taxation process and noted the timetable and procedures necessary for that process. Garfunkel moved, Zerby seconded, Adopting RESOLUTION NO. 04-079, "A Resolution Setting the 2005 Proposed General Fund Budget and Approving the Proposed 2004 Property Tax Levy, Collectible in 2005." Motion passed 5/0. Garfunkel moved, Zerby seconded, Adopting RESOLUTION NO. 04-080, "A Resolution Setting the Truth-in- Taxation Public Hearings on the Proposed 2005 Budgets and the 2004 Property Tax Levy Collectible in 2005." Motion passed 5/0. Administrator Dawson commended all Staff for bringing the budget together this year, and noted they had all done a great job in doing so. C. Amending Dates of Terms for Park and Planning Commission Members Administrator Dawson explained the Council had held work session discussion regarding the terms of members of its advisory commissions. He stated the discussions had concluded with a general agreement that the end-date for the terms of commissioners should be later than January 31, due to the timeline associated with having new council members taking office without enough time to prepare for appointments. He went on to explain an ordinance had been prepared to that end, noting the terms of the commissions had been drafted to begin on March 1 and extend to the last day of February of each three-year term. Turgeon moved, Garfunkel seconded, Adopting ORDINANCE NO. 406, "An Ordinance Amending Chapters 201 and 202 of the Shorewood City Code Relating to the Planning and Park Commission." Councilmember Zerby encouraged the Commissions to rotate the chair position as he thought it was good practice, and he had noticed any change in those positions in quite some time. He noted the issues were not at all personal but were related to having new leadership in place every so often as he believed it sparked fresh dialogue and interaction between commissioners. D. Excelsior Proposal regarding South Lake Minnetonka Police Department Joint Powers Agreement Administrator Dawson explained that on September 7, 2004, the Excelsior City Council had revised its proposal for a review of the SLMPD joint powers agreement. It put forward additional funding for the SLMPD in 2004 and 2005, subject to conditions related to formation of a Blue Ribbon Panel and implementation of the Panel's recommendations. It also would require an analysis of the Joint Powers Agreement by a neutral third party, such as a consulting firm, whose cost would be shared equally between the four member cities. He noted the revised proposal was less prescriptive than the original version, in that the Panel would be reduced in size from one representative from each city. Excelsior was asking that Shorewood and Greenwood name representatives and schedule the meeting with the other representatives from Excelsior and Tonka Bay to take place on September 22, 2004. CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES September 13, 2004 Page 8 of 10 . Administrator Dawson also explained he had met with City of Greenwood Attorney Mark Kelly, and Tonka Bay City Administrator Irvine as well as with City Attorney Keane to discuss the proposal. He then noted a brief memo from Greenwood City Attorney Kelly summarizing the outcome of the meeting and the staffs position on this issue. Staff concluded that the most recent proposal by the City of Excelsior was burdened with too many conditions to allow any city to recommend it for endorsement to the Coordinating Committee. ill particular, the September 8th proposal attempted to dictate the outcome of the proposed negotiations, and thus, should be rejected. However, provided Excelsior unconditionally pay its share of the fourth quarter 2004 SLMPD budget and approve and agree to fund Excelsior's share of the 2005 SLMPD budget, the Councils should then consider supporting the implementation of the Blue Ribbon Panel to operate as Excelsior had described in the September 8th proposal. Also, the Panel should be advisory to the cities and would be used to identify and discuss issues any city might wish to address. Councilmember Garfunkel stated he found it ironic that the City Council of Excelsior was noting a lack of money as a reason for not paying the full funding amount requested by the SLMPD in past years, however, it appeared the real issue was that the City Council was not willing to apply the funding to the SLMPD budget. He stated he found the contingencies stated in the proposals to be blackmail and ludicrous at best. . Councilmember Lizee stated she was tired of the offers made by the City Council of Excelsior to make a deal but its lack of effort utilized to uphold the Joint Powers Agreement. She noted the member cities entered into the Joint Powers Agreement in good faith and she thought the issues related to the SLMPD budget and concerns with the Joint Powers Agreement were separate. She stated it was imperative the City Council of Excelsior agree to pay the requested amount of the SLMPD budget for the remainder of this year and for 2005, and then work on the Joint Powers Agreement issues needing resolution. Councilmember Zerby stated he believed the City Council of Excelsior had cited economics as the basis to avoid paying its portion of the SLMPD budget; however, the issues of concern were not related to economics at all. Councilmember Turgeon stated hardship criteria for payment issues had been suggested to be written into the Joint Powers Agreement; however, the City Council of Excelsior had not agreed to include that criterion. She questioned what other options were available for an "out clause" within the Joint Powers Agreement. Attorney Keane responded there were none until the Public Safety facilities were paid in full. He went on to state the Joint Powers Agreement had been affirmed by all member cities in funding the public safety buildings and all member cities committed to live with the agreement at that time. Councilmember Turgeon stated she thought the antics of the City Council of Excelsior were tiresome, and they had had plenty of opportunity to work through budget issues. She stated there were several issues needing review and remedy within the Joint Powers Agreement, but the City Council of Excelsior needed to show good faith in providing the full amount of funding for the SLMPD that had been demanded by City of Excelsior residents. . Mayor Love agreed with comments presented this evening. He stated he had not heard a constructive approach to budget cuts in the process, nor was the issue related to denial of service. He stated he shared the same concerns as the Council regarding the Blue Ribbon Panel, and while he thought talking to work through disagreements was always the best avenue, he thought the "door should be left open" to discuss issues further. Councilmember Zerby offered to work with Mayor Love, on behalf of the City of Shorewood, as representative in any future discussion. CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES September 13, 2004 Page 9 oflO . Mayor Love also stated it was difficult and courageous to walk away from the past issues related to the budget; however, he appreciated the effort being made by all member cities to work through the remaining issues of concern related to the budget and Joint Powers Agreement. He thanked the City Staffs and Attorneys for all efforts related to moving these issues forward toward positive resolution. Administrator Dawson stated there would be a Special Meeting of the SLMPD Coordinating Committee related to the proposal. This meeting would be held on September 16, 2004, at 6:30 P.M. at the Shorewood City Hall. 10. ENGINEERING/PUBLIC WORKS A. Approve Revised Plans and Specifications and Authorize Advertisement for Bids - County Road 19 Project Engineer Brown stated on August 23,2004, the City Council as the lead agency for the County Road 19 Intersection project rejected the bids received for the project. This action was taken by the Council based upon recommendations from Hennepin County representatives. These representatives had also directed WSB and Associates, the City's consulting firm, to revise the plans to include various cost-cutting measures. Plans had been revised and resubmitted for re-bid purposes. To that end, Staff was recommending Council approve a resolution this evening directing this action. . Turgeon moved, Lizee seconded, Adopting RESOLUTION NO. 04-081, "A Resolution Approving Revised Plans and Specifications and Authorizing Advertisement for Re-bidding for the County State Aid Highway 19/5mithtown Road Intersection Reconstruction Project; S.A.P. 27-619-18, S.A.P.216-020-02." Motion passed 5/0. 11. STAFF AND COUNCIL REPORTS A. Administrator & Staff 1. CR 19 Construction Update Engineer Brown explained that in addition to the action of the Council this evening related to the resolution for rebidding the County Road 19 project, temporary traffic signals had been installed utilizing split phasing for entrance to the intersection. The signals would detect the presence of vehicles and would respond to emergency vehicle activity. These signals would be in place until completion of the construction project anticipated sometime in late 2005. Motorists were advised to be alert to the changes and plan accordingly for time constraints caused by the different circulation patterns through the intersection in upcoming months. 2. Cty Rd. 19 LRT Crossing . Engineer Brown stated the pedestrian crossing signs had been brought back to the original signage posted by the Trail. Discussions ensued between the City and County Staffs to work out a reasonable solution to manage public safety in that area. He stated these discussions would include an extensive public process of task groups to help with the resolution. B. Mayor & City Council Mayor Love stated there was a meeting of the Excelsior Fire District Governing Board on September 22, 2004. All Councilmembers were invited to attend as there would be a great deal of dialogue that evening ~. . . . CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES September 13, 2004 Page 10 of 10 in working with the firefighters to resolve issues of concern. He also stated he had the pleasure of hearing a presentation on the Excelsior Firefighter Relief Association recently and he believed it would be beneficial for Council to hear the presentation at an upcoming Regular City Council meeting as well. Mayor Love then stated it was with great sadness and respect that he had attended funeral of Wayne Stem earlier in the day. Mr. Stem had been a firefighter for the Excelsior Fire District for many years, and his family had over 75 years of combined fire fighting service with the District. He also noted Mr. Stem had been a great asset to the department through his committed service and he would be missed by all who knew him. 12. ADJOURN Zerby moved, Garfunkel seconded, Adjourning the Regular City Council Meeting of September 13,2004, at 8:58 P.M. Motion passed 5/0. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, Sally Keefe, Recording Secretary (l ATTEST: Woody Love, Mayor