02-22-10 CC WS MinCITY OF SHOREWOOD
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION
MONDAY, FEBRUARY 22, 2010
MINUTES
1. CONVENE CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION
• • r i
Absent: None
B. Review Agenda
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
Turgeon moved, Zerby seconded, approving the agenda as presented. Motion passed 4/0.
2. PARK COMMISSION CANDIDATE PHONE INTERVIEW - JOSH TRENT
Mayor Lizee stated a phone interview was conducted with the final applicant.
3. WATER CONNECTION FEES
Heck stated the Council has been discussing what to do with the city's water ordinance and water charges.
Councilmembers requested additional information on the history of the water connection fee and
information on what other communities charge. He noted staff discussed connection fees. He asked for
Council input on how to proceed.
Mayor Lizee suggested the Council review the seven questions beginning with whether everyone should pay
the same amount for water service. Zerby believed $10,000 seems too high. He was unsure where we are
going with this and whether there is a plan to expand the water service this year. Bailey asked why we
would want to change. Turgeon stated if you are going to assess someone, it should be for the value. If the
project doesn't cost $10,000, you shouldn't charge them $10,000.
Lizee asked if there should be a separation of fees for the assessment and the connection. She indicated she
feels there should be a clarification between the two. She noted there are fixed costs associated with the
connection while the assessment is a by project cost. Woodruff understood if the service is already in the
street, the homeowner has to buy a meter and pay an additional fee. Brown stated that is correct. The
permit fee, meter cost, and hardware add up to around $250. Woodruff believes the current system is
working and shouldn't be changed. Zerby noted everyone in the city has water already whether it is city
water or a well. Bailey asked Finance Director Burton whether other cities had a policy similar to
Shorewood's where there is an option to connect or not connect. Burton stated they are asking what other
cities do. She did review what the city of Arden Hills' policy is for improvements and who is assessed. She
stated staff is looking at the connection fee and not the accompanying costs. Copies of all the policies will
CITY OF SHOREWOOD WORK SESSION MEETING MINUTES
February 22, 2010
Page 2 of 2
Lizee asked what the current interest rate is and what is recommended. Burton stated the current rate is six
percent, and residents can borrow from their banks at lower interest rates. If we issue bonds, we cannot
charge more than two percent higher than the cost of the bonds.
Bailey stated at some point we will grandfather people in at the $10,000. Nielsen stated one of the strategies
would be to raise the connection fee and send a letter to the 200 to connect at the old rate. Turgeon stated if
we would change policies would people pay more. Nielsen stated once the connection fee is paid, they are
done. Brown stated at the time the Smithtown Road residents paid, they were under the impression they
were done. If we chose to raise the rate, they would have to pay more.
Turgeon stated if everyone is comfortable with the $10,000, Council should move forward. Bailey stated it
is helpful to have as much information as possible. Heck stated it appears most members are comfortable
with the current policy. The next question is providing information on why city water is a good idea, and he
asked whether that is something staff should pursue. Woodruff stated it would be important to provide that
kind of information to residents as we move forward. Turgeon stated it needs to be factual but very plain.
Heck stated staff could work with outside sources to help with the information. Bailey stated it would be
worthwhile to explore that depending on the cost. Heck stated lie would bring back additional information.
Brown stated there is still work to do on cleaning up the ordinance.
Lizee asked how many of the Councilmembers are okay with the $10,000 connection charge. Woodruff
stated lie didn't want to change it, and Zerby concurred. Turgeon stated she would rather see it separated out
to actual cost, but she went with the majority of the council. Lizee concurred.
4. ADJOURN
Councilmember Turgeon moved, Councilmember Zerby seconded, Adjourning the City Council
Work Session of February 22, 2010, at 6:55 P.M. Motion passed 5/0.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,
Clare T. Link, Recorder
ATTEST:
Christine Lizee, Mayor
inistrator /Clerk