Loading...
01-23-12 CC Reg Mtg MinCITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING COUNCIL CHAMBERS MONDAY, JANUARY 23, 2012 7:00 P.M. MINUTES 1. CONVENE CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING Mayor Liz& called the meeting to order at 7:00 P.M. A. Roll Call Present. Mayor Lizde; Councilmembers Hotvet, Siakel, Woodruff and Zerby; Attorney Keane; City Administrator Heck; Finance Director DeJong; Planning Director Nielsen; Director of Public Works Brown; and Engineer Landini Absent: None. B. Review Agenda Hotvet moved, Woodruff seconded, approving the agenda as presented. Motion passed 510. 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. City Council Work Session Minutes, January 9, 2012 Zerby moved, Woodruff seconded, approving the City Council Work Session Minutes of January 9, 2012, as presented. Motion passed 510. B. City Council Regular Meeting Minutes, January 9, 2012 Siakel moved, Woodruff seconded, Approving the City Council Regular Meeting Minutes of January 9, 2012, as amended in Item IO.A, Page 4, Paragraph 5, Sentence 1 change "Councilmember Siakel stated she thought it was great for the City to have Mr. Casale on the MCWD Board of Managers." to "Councilmember Siakel stated she thought it was great for the City to have a liaison to the MCWD. ", in the appointments put "Jeff Arnold" as the Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District Liaison, and clarify that the City will advertise for applicants for the Minnehaha Creek watershed District Liaison. Motion passed 510. C. City Council Executive Session Minutes, January 9, 2012 Woodruff moved, Zerby seconded, approving the City Council Executive Session Minutes of January 9, 2012, as presented. Motion passed 510. 3. CONSENT AGENDA Mayor Liz& reviewed the items on the Consent Agenda. Woodruff moved, Zerby seconded, Approving the Motions Contained on the Consent Agenda. CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES January 23, 2012 Page 2 of 11 A. Approval of the Verified Claims List B. Approval of the 2012 -2013 AFSCME Union Agreement C. Policy Manual Amendments (This was moved to Item 10.1) under General/New Business.) D. Tree City USA Designation Motion passed 510. 4. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR George Greenfield, 24715 Yellowstone Trail stated the people in his neighborhood have received two letters with opposing views. One letter urged the residents to petition for city water. The other listed arguments why that might be a bad idea. The two letter writers were Mrs. Raymond and Mr. Venero. From his perspective the two letters raised a number of questions that he thought are worth asking. He asked the following questions about the information in the letters. 1) He asked if the assertion in Mr. Venero's letter that the City paid the postage and the labor to mail out the first letter [Mrs. Raymond] is true. 2) He asked if the quotations attributed to Engineer Landini in Mr. Venero's letter were accurate. If they are, he has some serious questions about then. 3) One of the letter writes asserted that the Minnetonka County Club property is connected to City Water. If so, he asked if the Country Club still maintains some of its private wells and is it charged the same rate for water as a resident is. He stated it's his understanding that when a property owner connects to city water they have to abandon their private well. Mr. Greenfield asked Council, by whatever the appropriate means are, to require the owner /operator of the Country Club to report to the City the amount of chemicals and fertilizer it puts down on the Country Club golf course, and if it still has wells to also report on the amount of well water it uses annually. He staked the issues raised by the two letters had largely to do with compromising the water quality. He then stated that everyone who has a home adjacent to the Country Club property has to be concerned about what the golf course may be doing to compromise the supply of well water and the quality of the well water. Mr. Greenfield stated he would appreciate it if sometime in the near future he would receive answers to his questions. Mayor Lizee clarified a property owner does not have to abandon their well after they connect to city water, but the well and city water cannot be cross connected. Mayor Liz& thanked Mr. Greenfield for coming. 5. PUBLIC BEARING None. CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES January 23, 2012 Page 3 of 11 6. REPORTS AND PRESENTATIONS None. 7. PARKS Park Commissioner Kjolhaug reported on matters considered and actions taken at the January 10, 2012, Park Commission meeting (as detailed in the minutes of that meeting). 8. PLANNING Planning Commission Chair Geng reported on matters considered and actions taken at the January 17, 2012, Planning Commission meeting (as detailed in the minutes of that meeting). 9. ENGINEERING /PUBLIC WORKS A. Storm Water Pollution Prevention Program Public Information Meeting Mayor Lizde opened the Public Information Meeting at 7:21P.M. She asked Engineer Landini to give a brief presentation about the City's Storm Water Pollution Prevention Program ( SWPPP). Engineer Landini stated that holding a public information meeting about the City's SWPPP is a requirement for obtaining a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Municipal Storm Water permit, a permit required by the Federal Clean Water Act. The permit is administered by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and is called the Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System. The two requirements of this permit are preparation of a SWPPP and subsequent annual reports. In preparation for the annual report the City must hold a public meeting to discuss the SWPPP. All public comments received during this meeting will be recorded in the Record of Decision which will be filed with the annual report. Landini showed video produced by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the U.S. Botanic Garden titled "Reduce Runoff: Slow It Down, Spread It Out, Soak It In." The video highlighted to help manage storm water runoff. It showcased techniques that are being used in urban areas to reduce the effects of storm water runoff on the quality of downstream receiving waters. Landini noted that he will provide the Lake Minnetonka Communications Commission with a copy of this DVD containing the video played, along with three others. Mayor Lizee stated that she does not think that any of the techniques described in the video come as a surprise to City staff, Council or a lot of the viewing audience. She noted the City has held workshops on rain gardens and green roofs, and the City has published many articles in the City's newsletter. Councilmember Hotvet asked if the video could be put on the City's website. Engineer Landini responded it's on the EPA's website. Landini stated he thought the file would be too large to put on the City's website, but staff can put a link to the video on the website. Seeing no one present wishing to speak on this topic, Mayor Lizde opened and closed the public testimony portion of the Public Information Meeting at 7:33 P.M. CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES January 23,2012 Page 4 of 11 Siakel moved, Zerby seconded, directing Staff to prepare a Record of Decision Regarding the City's Storm Water Pollution Prevention Program and submit the annual report by June 30, 2012. Motion passed 510. 10. GENERAL /NEW BUSINESS A. Redistricting Schedule and Precinct Establishment Discussion Deputy Clerk Panchyshyn stated the redrawing of boundaries of election districts is done every ten years after the completion of the decennial Census. The purpose is to make the election districts as equal in population as practical. Panchyshyn explained the City has five precincts; four on the mainland and one on the island. The meeting packet contains information about staffing and equipment costs are to run the elections. She asked Council if it wants to consider reducing the number of precincts to four or three. She then asked if she should have Hennepin County draw up different plans. One option would be for four precincts and the other would be for three. She noted she will work with the County on this. Councilmember Woodruff stated based on the material provided in the meeting packet he believes there is an opportunity to reduce the number of precincts. He expressed his preference for a precinct to remain on Enchanted Island. He stated from his perspective he thought it would cause a problem for the 138 residents on the islands to have to drive ten miles and through four cities to vote on the mainland. He commented that the City's residents who live on the islands don't get a lot from the City other than having the roadways plowed and having the sewage taken away. Councilmember Siakel stated the way the people vote on the island should be preserved. She then stated she could support downsizing to four precincts with leaving the island precinct in tact. But, she could also support keeping five precincts. She then stated she wanted the City to make it efficient for people to vote. She cautioned against doing anything to make the voting lines so long that it will discourage residents from voting. Councilmember Hotvet expressed her support for keeping the island precinct. She stated she has given some thought about having an east Shorewood poling place at Minnewasbta Church, and a west Shorewood poling place at the Southshore Community Center, and the island precinct. She commented she wasn't sure if that option had been considered. Councilmember Zerby stated this is a presidential election year so voters would be motivated to find a new poling place if things changed. He expressed his support for keeping the island precinct. He stated he could support downsizing to three or four precincts. Mayor Liz& expressed her support for keeping the island precinct. She stated she could support downsizing to four precincts but not three. Councilmember Siakel asked Panchyshyn if the City has any idea what time of day people voted. She stated from her vantage point it's more important to encourage residents to vote than it is to be efficient and save a few dollars. Panchyshyn responded the busiest voting time is early in the morning and that lasts for a few hours. After that the flow of voters is steady. Panchyshyn explained she will have the County draw up plans for three and four precincts and for each option one of the precincts will be on the island. She expressed concern that if there were only an east and CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES January 23, 2012 Page 5 of 11 a west poling place on the mainland that the polling places could be too busy. She recommended staying with three precincts on the mainland. Mayor Liz& noted Panchyshyn's opinion is very important she has run the elections for many years. Panchyshyn stated she will come back before Council with plans in March. Councilmember Hotvet asked Deputy Clerk Panchyshyn if the City has historical voting counts by time of day for each polling place. Panchyshyn responded the City does not keep those types of statistics. Hotvet stated there may be some value in collecting those statistics. B. Freeman Park Buckthorn Removal Grant Opportunity Engineer Landim explained Great River Greening (GRG) sent out many emails regarding grant opportunities to many government bodies. His original thought was there may be grant money for storm water management improvements. He met with representatives from GRG to 'find out what programs it had to offer. He Teamed that there were not many grant opportunities for storm water management. There were grant opportunities for upland reforestation. Freeman Park quickly came to his mind as a buckthorn removal and reforestation possibility. He and Todd Rexine, with GRG, visited Freeman Park in December 2011 and Mr. Rexine developed an estimate to do restoration work. He provided an estimate for three sections of the Park. The City would have to commit to covering half of the stated costs for the areas of interest. Landim then explained the opportunity to take advantage of this particular grant is very short. GRG is going to apply for an amendment in February 2012 to its existing Legislative — Citizen Commission on Minnesota Resources (LCCMR) grant. GRG is finalizing its list of projects now. The reason there is a grant opportunity available is the original grant project fell through. This is an opportunity for the City to get help with funding the removal of buckthorn in Freeman Park. If Council is not receptive to this short time frame, the City could direct Staff to apply with GRG for a future grant. Landim noted that Mr. Rexine is present this evening to answer any questions Council may have. He also noted he has had only one meeting with Mr. Rexine. Mayor Lizoe stated this is a fabulous opportunity. She thanked Staff and Mr. Rexine for moving so quickly on this. She stated Freeman Park has been a thom in the City's side with all of the buckthorn along side of the LRT Trail and the trail around the Park. She commented she thought discussions about buckthorn removal began about the time Shorewood Ponds was developed. She asked Mr. Rexine to provide Council with a brief overview of GRG. Mr. Rexine stated GRG is a nonprofit organization based in St. Paul. It works metro wide and is trying to expand to be state wide. The main focus is community -based restoration of open space and waters. Where appropriate it tries to engage local community volunteers with projects on site. One of its current projects fell through so it sent out requests for proposals to municipalities within the seven - county metro area to find out if any municipalities had potential projects. The grant opportunity is for upland habitat restoration. Be noted he thought Freeman Park qualifies. He explained it is more of a floodplain forest situation with a lot of mature trees and a lot of buckthorn. If this is too quick a timeframe there, is another grant opportunity in April for the next round of funding which would come online in July of 2013. It is a two -year funding cycle. He stated there are ongoing restoration and maintenance needs. It hasn't been a problem in the past to go back to LCCMR to ask for additional monies to continue the restoration process. CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES January 23, 2012 Page 6 of 11 Councilmember Siakel stated the cost estimates broke Freeman Park down into three areas. She asked if grant monies are available for all three areas. Mr. Rexine responded he broke the estimate in to three areas to make it more feasible. Mr. Rexine stated the largest of the three areas, which is Area A, could be broken into smaller areas. He noted there are ways to phase these types of projects. It could be a multi- year project or a multi -grant project. He noted that buckthorn removal and reforestation is costly. Councilmember Hotvet asked if it is possible for any part of the City's match to be in -kind. Mr. Rexine stated the City has resources to help with the project. Volunteer labor could be an in -kind component. Hauling the buckthorn away and replanting are things that could be done by volunteers. GRG prefers to use certified chainsaw sawyers to cut the buckthorn and state approved pesticide applicators treat the buckthorn stumps after it is cut. Councilmember Woodruff stated getting rid of buckthorn is a great idea. He noted Area A is heavily infested. He asked what motivation the City would have to remove from Area A the buckthorn and replace it with other species. At this time the only plan the City has is to make it an urban forest. He expressed concern about the cost. The estimated cost for removal and reforestation of Area A is $64,000 and the City would pay one half of that cost. He questioned what would compel the City to do Area A. He stated based on the information in the meeting packet buckthorn is encroaching into Areas B and C which are not infested today. From his perspective it's best to keep buckthorn from going into places you don't want it in. Those two Areas are used for various purposes. Ile stated for him it would be easier to support the City spending about $12,000 to remove buckthorn and plant new species in Areas B and C. Doing a smaller area would give the City the opportunity to find out what amount of volunteer support there is. He stated he supports doing Areas B and C provided Staff can identify a source for the funding. Councilmember Siakel asked Mr. Rexine what GRG's experience has been with getting local people involved. Mr. Rexine responded GRG's experience has been very good. He stated this project would be considered a large volunteer event. He commented that during the spring and fall seasons GRG typically has 6 — 8 events going on each weekend. For this project GRG would recruit in Shorewood and throughout the rest of the metro area. Councilmember Zerby suggested pursuing this opportunity. Ile stated the project could be funded out of the Community Infrastructure Fund (CIF). He thought that would be a good use of some of those funds. He expressed his support for doing all of Freeman Park and would accept doing only Areas B and C as an alternative. Mayor Liz& stated that Freeman Park is a very visible park, in particular Areas B and C. There is a lot of activity that goes on in the Park. She explained that Area A is quite spread out. She stated the City needs to explore a partnership with the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) because the MCWD has spoken about stormwater management and restoration of wetlands in the Freeman Park area. She suggested doing Areas B and C at this time and waiting to do Area A until there is an overall plan for the Park which includes a partnership with the MCWD. Councilmember Siakel stated if only Areas B and C are done at this time she asked if the buckthorn in Area A will encroach back into those two Areas. She asked if it would be better to do all of it at the same time. Mr. Rexine explained birds spread buckthorn. GRG has recommended the ongoing spraying of seedlings or pulling them out because there would be a seed bank close by if all three Areas are not done at the same time. He stated it doesn't all have to be removed at the same time. CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES January 23, 2012 Page 7 of 11 Woodruff moved, directing Staff to move forward with this grant opportunity for Areas B and C in Freeman Park and to identify a funding source for it. Councilmember Woodruff reminded Council that the Community Infrastructure Fund is 103 percent spoken for. Council assigned all of the money in the Fund to the Trail Plan. In fact, more money was assigned to the Trail Plan than is in the Fund. Mayor Liz& stated the money in that Fund has not been assigned. Woodruff stated that was done during the 2012 budget process and it is in the approved Trails Capital Improvement Program (CIP). Woodruff then stated if Council wants to reassign some of the money currently earmarked for the 'frail Plan it will need to find other money for the Trail Plan. Director DeJong stated essentially that is what was adopted as part of the CIP. For any project in the Trail CIP beyond next year there is substantial question about the scope and timing of those projects. He explained at the time of adopting of the CIP he presented in the Financial Management Plan (FMP) which reflected the Community Infrastructure Fund dollars would be transferred on annual basis into the Trail Construction Fund. The documents reflected there are not sufficient funds to fund all of the projects in the Trail CIP at their projected costs. Lizeeseconded. Park Commissioner Kjolhaug asked for clarification on the maintenance requirements and the costs for that maintenance. Mr. Rexine explained that once the state is reached where there are minimal seedlings they could be pulled or spot treated on an annual basis. He noted the maintenance effort becomes less and less over time. Councilmember Woodruff asked Staff to ensure there is a maintenance budget line item for 2013 and beyond to follow up on the work that will be done this year. He commented that based on his personal experience buckthorn will come back at a decreasing rate each year and the birds will continue to carry the berries into the cleared Areas. Councilmember Siakel suggested the City ask the volunteer gardeners to do some of this work Councilmember Hotvet asked if GRG provides help with developing a marketing plan for getting volunteers. Mr. Rexine stated it would do the outreach for the project it oversees. It would ask the City to provide insight into where it may find the volunteers. Engineer Landini stated he would ask the Communications Coordinator to publish something in the City's newsletter and send something in the utility bills about the project and the need for volunteers. Motion passed 510. Mayor Lizde asked Mr. Rexine to contact Administrator Heck and Engineer Landini to start this process. C. Southshore Community Center Operation and Management Agreement Administrator Heck stated the meeting packet contains a copy of an amended agreement between the City and Community Rec Resources (CRR) for the operation and management of the Southshore Community Center (SSCC). The amendment is because of the City's desire to increase the marketing and visibility of the SSCC. In conjunction with this, the City terminated its contract agreement with CRR for park coordination services. He highlighted the components of the amended agreement. CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES January 23, 2012 Page 8 of 11 1. The agreement expires at the end of 2012. 2. The agreement increases the number of hours dedicated to the SSCC from 17 to 35. 3. The base fee for services increases to $5,000 per month for a total annual contract of $60,000. 4. The agreement provides for a monthly base commission of 15 percent of the monthly gross revenue. 5. The contractor will be eligible for an additional 5 percent commission based on achieving average monthly revenues of $4,500, figured quarterly. 6. The City will no longer pay for clerical assistance; any clerical assistance will be the responsibility of CRR. 7. The City will now require CRR to post insurance and a bond with the City. Heck noted he worked with Kristi Anderson, principal for CRR, on this amendment. Ms. Anderson has agreed to it. He explained staff determined contracting for these services is still more cost effective than hiring a staff person. Staffing the SSCC would require a minimum of a full -time coordinator and possibly 17 hours per week of clerical support. Councilmember Woodruff stated Council has talked about this a number of times. He noted that he thought CRR has done a good job of operating the SSCC for the last several years. He stated he did not think Council has been provided with enough information to make an educated decision on this evening. He explained it's his recollection that the SSCC 2012 budget reflects revenues of $90,000 and the expenses for the CRR portion of the operation were budgeted at around $60,000. Woodruff then stated he needs to see a financial explanation of how this is going to work. He explained 15 percent of $90,000 is $13,500 for the base incentive. That is a lot more than the $9,750 shown in the contract versus staff analysis included in the meeting packet. That doesn't include the 5 percent commission possibility. He noted that Administrator Heck's memorandum for this item states the City's potential subsidy for SSCC operations could increase to $30,000 from the current projected subsidy of $13,600 in the budget. He commented that he is not sure he believes the $13,600 because he hasn't seen a financial analysis. He expressed concern about what this will cost the City. Woodruff explained that under Fee for Service item 3.b it talks about what he terms the imputed rent if the City uses the facility for a function and CRR has to manage the administration of that function. CRR will be paid a 15 percent commission based on what the rent would have been. The agreement doesn't talk about what the rent might be. Item 3.c talks about CRR being eligible for an additional 5 percent commission based on achieving average monthly revenues of $4,500. He questioned why the City would pay that. Maybe the City could pay an additional commission if CRR over achieves revenue targets. He noted that CRR is only being asked to maintain professional liability insurance in an amount not less than $300,000, yet other contractors are asked to carry $1 million in liability insurance. The City's obligation to the State is $1 million. He stated item 17 grants Kristi Anderson the first right of refusal if the City chooses to discontinue contracting for the operation of the SSCC. He stated that is very problematic for him. One of the reasons the City may want to take that in house is because it wants someone other than Ms. Anderson to manage the SSCC He asked that item 17 to be removed from the agreement. Councihnember Zerby stated he was pleased that this is moving forward. He noted that this is in line with the City's goal of responding to service needs for changing community demographics. He stated there has not been a long line of people expressing interest in running the SSCC. He noted that Ms. Anderson has become a bit specialized in running the SSCC and understanding SSCC operations. He stated that he thought Ms. Anderson would feel the first right of refusal clause to be important in the contract agreement. He then stated he thought it is a fair agreement and that Administrator Heck has been working on this agreement with Ms. Anderson over the last couple of months. He noted there has been give and CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES January 23, 2012 Page 9 of 11 take during that process and he believes Heck has brought the best possible agreement forward for consideration. Zerby moved, Lizee seconded, approving the amended agreement with Community Rec Resources for the operation of the Southshore Community Center. Councilmember Siakel stated she believes the management and operation of the SSCC needs more time and attention. Ms. Anderson is a good person to do that for the City. She suggested Council have an in depth discussion about contributions from the other four member cities. Memberships could be considered. She noted that all of the responsibility should not fall on Shorewood. She stated she doesn't think there needs to be a separate budget for the SSCC. It is part of the City's parks, culture and recreation. She recommended this be reviewed more comprehensively. She commented she thought this is a good start. She expressed some concern about the projected subsidy increase and how it will be funded. She stated she thought it is the right thing to do. She asked for more information and additional discussion about the SSCC. Councilmember Hotvet stated she would have appreciated having more information. She then stated that according to the resident survey the SSCC isn't used as much as it could be. She went on to state she would like to have the SSCC incorporated into parks and recreation. She expressed agreement with the need for more discussion about the SSCC in general. Councilmember Siakel asked if removing the first right of refusal would be a deal breaker for Ms. Anderson. Mayor Lizee responded she thought it would and that it was something that Ms. Anderson asked for. Mayor Lizee noted this agreement is for this calendar year. She stated she thought this agreement could help move the SSCC forward. Motion passed 4/1 with Woodruff dissenting. D. Policy Manual Amendments This item was removed from the consent agenda at Councilmember Woodruff s request Councilmember Woodruff stated from his perspective Section 11.02 Subdivision 3 Rate of Severance Pay is not very clear. It includes the statement "Employees who leave employment due to reduction in workforce or elimination of position, shall receive, in addition to all other compensation payouts, payment equal to one week of pay for each year of service with the City." He noted the policy the City started informally is for each full year of service; not partial years. He recommended it be clarified with regard to part-time employees. It should say something about regular part-time employees having their pay set to what they are normally paid per week over some previous period. He asked Staff to make changes to Section 11.02 and bring it back for consideration. Councilmember Siakel agreed with Councilmember Woodruff. Mayor Lizee suggested Councilmembers contact staff in advance of the meeting if they have questions or concerns about items. That allows them the opportunity to come prepared to address the questions or concerns during the meeting. CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES January 23, 2012 Page 10 of 11 Woodruff moved, Liz& seconded, continuing this item to the February 13, 2012, Council meeting. Motion passed 510. 11. OLD BUSINESS None. 12. STAFF AND COUNCIL REPORTS A. Administrator and Staff GreenStep Cities Update Administrator Heck noted that Staff is continuing to make progress on the GreenStep Cities Program project. The building audit is scheduled to happen this month. 2. Project Update Administrator Heck stated one of the projects is to look for additional partnerships with South Lake cities. One of them is for providing some level financial services to the City of Excelsior. The Excelsior City Council approved the recommendation made by the Excelsior City Manager. Heck then stated that he and Engineer Landini met earlier in the day to discuss the County Road 19 trail. He explained that if the City wants to put the trail on Hennepin Comity right -of -way (ROW) the City would have to relocate several power poles and that would be very expensive. To build a trail on County ROW would require that it be built to State standards. Another option is to move it farther off the road onto Xeel Energy property. Staff needs to meet with Xcel representatives to find out if that is even an option. This project is in the preliminary design phase. Financial and Investment Report Director DeJong noted the meeting packet contains copies of the November 2011 Monthly Budget Report and December 2011 Quarterly Investment Report. Other Administrator Heck noted the February 13, 2012, Council work session will be dedicated to hearing a report on the resident survey. During its February 13"' regular meeting Council will consider an ordinance amendment and the agreement between the City and the City of Excelsior for providing financial services. He asked Council to identify what topics it wants to cover with the Planning Commission during Council's joint meeting with that Commission on February 21" and also with the Park Commission during Council's joint meeting with that Commission on February 28` B. Mayor and City Council Mayor Lizee stated there is a quarterly meeting of the mayors of the cities in the Minnetonka School District coordinated by the District's Superintendent scheduled for January 25"' at and it will be held at the Southshore Community Center (SSCC). Also on January 25` Hennepin County Commissioner Jan Calhson is holding a meeting on the Excelsior Library. It will be held at the SSCC There is a South Lake CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES January 23, 2012 Page 11 of 11 Minnetonka Police Department Coordinating Committee scheduled for February 8 at 5:30 P.M. at the public safety facility. Councilmember Zerby stated there is an Excelsior Fire District Board meeting scheduled for January 25"' at 6:00 P.M. 13. ADJOURN Hotvet moved, Siakel seconded, Adjourning the City Council Regular Meeting of January 23, 2012, at 8:29 P.M. Motion passed 5/0. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED Christine Freeman, Recorder ATTEST: y Christine Liz6e, Mayor Bri0n ffeck, Cit / dministrator /Clerk dit