06-22-20 CC Reg Mtg MinutesCITY OF SHOREWOOD
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
MONDAY, JUNE 22, 2020
MINUTES
1. CONVENE CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
Mayor Zerby called the meeting to order at 7:00 P.M.
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
7:00 P.M.
Due to the Centers for Disease Control's recommendation limiting the number of people present
at a meeting and pursuant to MN Statute 13D.02, the Shorewood City Council was held via
electronic means.
I_�3.7II[�Tf
Present. Mayor Zerby; Councilmembers Johnson, Labadie, Siakel, and Sundberg; City
Attorney Keane; City Administrator Lerud; City Clerk Thone; Finance Director
Rigdon; Planning Director Darling; Director of Public Works Brown; and, City
Engineer Budde
Absent: None
B. Review Agenda
Siakel moved, Labadie seconded, approving the agenda as presented.
Roll Call Vote: Labadie, Johnson, Siakel, Sundberg, Zerby voted Aye. Motion passed.
2. CONSENT AGENDA
Mayor Zerby reviewed the items on the Consent Agenda.
Siakel moved, Johnson seconded, Approving the Motions Contained on the Consent
Agenda and Adopting the Resolutions Therein.
A. City Council Regular Meeting Minutes from June 8, 2020
B. Approval of the Verified Claims List
C. Appointment of Emma Notermann as Planning Technician
D. Approve Purchase of Dehumidification System for Amesbury Well
Roll Call Vote: Labadie, Johnson, Siakel, Sundberg, Zerby voted Aye. Motion passed.
3. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR - NONE
CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
JUNE 22, 2020
Page 2 of 10
4. PUBLIC HEARING
A. Mary Lake Outlet, City Project 19 -09
City Engineer Budde gave an overview of the feasibility study for the Mary Lake Outlet project, a
landlocked lake with no natural outlet. He stated that over the last six years, the City has pumped
Mary Lake three times. He noted that there are currently two structures that do not meet current
zoning requirements that are the most at risk. He gave an overview of the possible outlet routing
options and explained that the best option was to route eastward using existing right -of -way to
Studer Pond. He stated that staff is recommending Alternative One using an eight -inch pipe with
an outlet at normal water level of Mary Lake. He noted that as part of the feasibility study they
had completed a topographic survey, updated the hydraulic modeling and updated the cost
estimates. He explained that both open cut construction and directional drilling would be used for
this project. He gave examples of one - hundred -year flood events and what would happen in its
current condition as well as the proposed condition with the eight -inch outlet. He noted that the
structures at 23955 Clover Lane and 23950 Elder Turn do not currently meet the City's zoning
ordinance, but they are grandfathered in because the ordinance applies to new structures. He
explained that the City is not trying to fix this issue and bring them into compliance but would like
to reduce the risk associated with them being damaged. He gave an overview of the hydrograph
results for the Studer Pond Water levels with the proposed improvements. He noted that the
structure at 23445 Smithtown Road does not meet the zoning requirement and in this case, the
project does not make the situation better or worse. He stated that this project would not be
assessed and is estimated to cost approximately six hundred fifty -four thousand dollars. He
reviewed the permitting and approvals that will be necessary to complete the project. He gave
an overview of the proposed schedule and noted that staff is estimating that construction will
begin in late September or early October of 2020. He stated that the plan would be for the project
to be substantially completed by late November of 2020.
Mayor Zerby opened the public hearing for comment at 7:21 p.m.
Kenneth Huskins, 24075 Mary Lake Trail, asked about the retention pond adjacent to his property
and whether there would be any consequences to this pond with the City's proposed solution.
City Engineer Budde stated that there should not be any impact to that retention pond.
Mr. Huskins asked whether the grading was completed to connect the north part of the lake with
the main body of the lake whether they may be any bi- directional flow of the water.
City Engineer Budde stated that they he does not think there will be any significant bi- directional
flow. He stated that there may be a minor flow, but by creating a channel, it is making a way for
it to look, act and operate as one basin. He explained that because the outlet is on the north side,
that is generally the direction the water will drain. He stated that he is not concerned about bi-
directional flow in this situation.
Mr. Huskins asked about the budget estimate and whether there is a plus or minus associated
with it for potential overage of underage of the estimated costs for the bids that may come in.
City Engineer Budde stated that he believes the estimate given is on the high side and as long as
there are no unforeseeable issues, he expects the bids to come in under the amount he has
estimated.
Roger Lubke, 5915 Minnetonka Drive, noted that the picture that was shown for the directional
drilling showed a very small pipe. He stated that there is an eight -inch pipe coming out of Mary
Lake and asked if he was missing something based on what was shown in the pictures. He stated
that his biggest question is regarding funding. He stated that City Engineer Budde stated that
CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
JUNE 22, 2020
Page 3 of 10
there would not be assessments for this project and asked if that meant everyone in the City
would be paying for this project. He stated that in his opinion, this project directly benefits the
residents that live near Mary Lake and not the general City population and asked why tax payer
dollars would be used to fund this project..
City Engineer Budde stated that the picture shown of the direction drill mechanism had a three -
inch diameter head. He stated that in this case, there will be a larger head put onto the machine
in order to accommodate the eight -inch pipe. He stated that the City's policy is not to assess for
any projects. He stated that the City is planning to use some money from the general fund, but
also to bond for some of the costs. City Administrator Lerud clarified that stormwater is an
Enterprise Fund so stormwater utility fees are used to finance storm water projects, and no
general fund money will used for this project.
Mr. Lubke asked whether this would be carrying the nutrients from all the surrounding lawns all
the way into Lake Minnetonka. Councilmember Siakel explained that almost all of the water on
the western side of the City eventually makes it way to Lake Minnetonka. She stated that it has
been quite a while since the City banned phosphorus from fertilizers so there has been quite a bit
done to try not to have excess chemicals flow through the water system.
Mr. Lubke stated that he would think that what would make the most sense is to have this water
drain into some sort of pond where there are reeds and other vegetation, so the water is mitigated
before it would run into a lake. He stated that one of the alternatives presented was for this to go
into some sort of wetland before going into Lake Minnetonka which he thinks is a bit more
environmentally friendly. He noted that he was not trying to criticize this plan, but would like to
know if this situation has been thoroughly thought through.
City Engineer Budde stated that the City has not done water quality testing of what is in Mary
Lake versus anything downstream. He noted that if you look at historical photos, Studer Pond
has been a wetland. He noted that when the water leaves Studer Pond, it will go through another
wetland system before it makes it way to Lake Minnetonka. He stated that this water will go
through two basins before it gets to Lake Minnetonka.
Mayor Zerby explained that this plan also requires approval by the Minnehaha Creek Watershed
District who looks very closely at these types of things.
Nicole Rubinger 24035 Mary Lake Trail, stated that from the information presented, her
understanding is that it only costs about $16,000 to pump down the level of the lake, why the City
would be looking at spending over $600,000. City Engineer Budde explained that it cost that
much to pump down the lake, not including city staff time. He noted that this has had to be done
a number of times over the last ten years.
Ms. Rubinger asked about the cost benefit of moving forward with this project versus if the City
keeps on doing what it has been doing. Councilmember Siakel stated that she thinks there is
probably a better way to drain it than the way it has been done in the past. She stated that there
have been a number of residents that have come forward over a number of years to ask the City
to do something to correct the situation. She reiterated that the City does not assess for this type
of project and explained that the City took a look at the needs of the entire western portion of the
City with regarding to water issues.
CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
JUNE 22, 2020
Page 4 of 10
Director of Public Works Brown stated that the City has had to seek emergency permitting from
the DNR for past pumping that needed to be done. He explained that with the proposed design
of an eight -inch pipe, their hope is to gradually drain down the lake during heavy rain events rather
than holding off and waiting until the last minute when homes are in danger. He stated that the
pumping can cause more environmental damage such as erosion and dumping nutrients because
of it being pumped rather than flowing.
Councilmember Johnson stated that for the residents that live near the pump location, they have
about six weeks of hearing the loud noise of the pump which becomes a quality of life issue for
nearby residents. Public Works Director Brown stated that they also had to cross driveways in
the area with the equipment and people definitely got tired of it.
Brett Brooks, 23610 Gillette Curve, asked about the required easement and why the existing
easement cannot just be used.
City Engineer Budde reviewed the location of the existing easement and the proposed easement.
He explained that in order to directionally drill, there needs to be a fairly straight path for the
equipment to be able to work which is why the proposed easement is there.
Mr. Brooks stated that when the watermain easement originally went in, it was proposed in almost
the same location as is suggested for this project. He explained that the property owners did not
want an easement in that location and sought legal action to get it moved to a different location.
He stated that the City has said that this project will have a positive impact on the properties
surrounding Mary Lake, but it will have a detrimental impact on the property where the easement
is required. He noted that they had written a letter opposing this easement.
City Engineer Budde stated that the City did receive the letter. He noted that there are a few
changes that can be made to the design but the City will need an easement from this property
owner or one off of Wood Duck Circle. He noted that the current recommendation is, in his
opinion, the best route, but the City can consider some other options, if necessary.
Councilmember Siakel asked what Mr. Brooks meant by this project being detrimental to this
property. Mr. Brooks stated that his understanding is that the property owner cannot do anything
on top of the easement so it makes that portion of the property virtually unusable.
Garrett Nordlinq, 5810 Minnetonka Drive, asked if this project will improve water quality or if there
will be any side effects on Mary Lake.
City Engineer Budde stated that he does not envision any significant water quality or side effects
on Mary Lake.
Ms. Rubinger, stated that there are a lot of turtles and other animal life in Mary Lake and asked if
there will be any change in animal behavior or their habitat related to this project. City Engineer
Budde stated that what this does for Mary Lake is make the water level consistent over the whole
season rather than having the levels bounce up in elevation. He stated that if there are birds or
animals that have their nests along the shore, they will be less impacted with this proposed project
than in their current condition. He noted that the City will also be seeking a permit from the DNR
for this project.
CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
JUNE 22, 2020
Page 5 of 10
Susan Louris, 556 Williams Street, stated that their property backs up to Studer Pond. She asked
if there was a 100 -year water event, how much Studer Pond would rise. City Engineer Budde
stated that it would raise it about one inch.
Jeff Pomeroy, 23955 Clover Lane, asked about the open trenching along Clover Lane, which side
of the road it will be on, and what will happen with the soil that is dug out for the project. City
Engineer Budde stated that they have located the utilities already, and are proposing to put the
pipe on the north side of Clover Lane within the City right -of -way. He stated that he believes that
the dirt piles would get placed on the road. He stated that they will also do restoration with
seeding.
Mr. Lubke asked if the pipe and plans were sufficient so there would not be a situation where
Studer Pond may overflow backwards into Mary Lake. City Engineer Budde explained that there
is about twenty -five feet of fall between Mary Lake and Studer Pond so it should not be an issue.
There being no additional public comment, Mayor Zerby closed the public hearing at 7:52 p.m.
5. REPORTS AND PRESENTATIONS
6. PARKS
7. PLANNING
8. ENGINEERING /PUBLIC WORKS
A. Accept Bids and Award Contract for Woodside Road/Woodside Lane Street
Improvement and Watermain Extension, City Project 19 -04
Public Works Director Brown explained that Katie Koscielak from WSB has been working with the
Department of Indian Affairs and asked her to give an update to the Council.
Katie Koscielak, WSB, gave an overview of the reclamation and watermain improvements at
Woodside Road and Woodside Lane and noted that there will only be watermain improvements
along Kathleen Court. She gave an overview of the archeological investigation and noted that
not much has changed since her last update. She stated that the entities involved have indicated
that the project can move forward with a monitoring plan as proposed. She stated that there were
seven bids opened on June 16, 2020. She indicated that the low bid was from New Look
Contracting for a total of $861,316. She gave an overview of the anticipated schedule and noted
that construction should begin in mid -July of 2020 and be completed by October of 2020. She
explained that because of COVID -19 they will not be meeting in larger groups so they will be
getting some newsletters and other forms of communication out to residents so they are informed
about what is going to be happening.
Councilmember Siakel stated that she wants to ensure that the residents in this area know that
this is coming and that there is good communication. Ms. Koscielak stated that they put some
frequently asked questions on the website a few weeks ago about what they can expect during
the reclamation project. She noted that she has been working with Communications Coordinator
Moore on getting in touch with residents to let them know the project is coming. She stated that
they sent out an update about a week ago and have already received four phone calls from people
hoping to coordinate the open house at their home.
CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
JUNE 22, 2020
Page 6 of 10
Councilmember Johnson stated that he also believes that there has been construction signage
up for quite a while. Public Works Director Brown stated that in addition to construction signage,
the City has also been working with residents as Center Point Energy has also been in the area
completing work.
Johnson moved, Siakel seconded, Adopting RESOLUTION NO. 20 -062, "A Resolution
Accepting Bids and Awarding Contract for the Woodside Road and Woodside Lane Street
Reclamation and Watermain Extension Project, City Project 19 -04"
Roll Call Vote: Labadie, Johnson, Siakel, Sundberg, Zerby voted Aye. Motion passed.
B. Accept Bids and Award Contract for Enchanted Island and Shady Island
Street Reclamation Project, City Project 18 -11
Public Works Director Brown stated that this is a similar project to the Woodside project and asked
Ms. Koscielak to give an update to the Council.
Ms. Koscielak, WSB, gave an overview of the reclamation improvements on Enchanted Lane;
Enchanted Drive; Enchanted Circle; Dellwood Lane; Shady Island Road; Shady Island Circle;
Shady Island Point; Shady Island Trail; and the possibility of including the alternate improvement
on Enchanted Point. She stated that the State Historical Preservation Office has indicated that
that the City can also move forward with this project with monitoring when construction begins.
She stated that they received five bids for this project with the lowest being from Northwest
Asphalt, Inc. She noted that this bid is also came in below the engineering estimate for project
cost. She stated that she is recommending moving forward with the base bid and excluding the
alternate. She stated the residents along Enchanted Point expressed interest in have an otta seal
at some time in the future to stabilize Enchanted Point rather than including it in this project. She
reviewed the anticipated schedule and noted that construction should begin in July and end in
October of 2020. She reiterated that because of COVID -19 they will be using alternative methods
to communicate with residents prior to construction. She noted that they will also be including
Minnetrista in the mailings and weekly updates.
Mayor Zerby stated that he has gotten calls from two residents who live on Enchanted Point and
are concerned because there is a portion of the road that is asphalt and not gravel which was
placed there by private citizens and not the City. He stated that the residents were concerned
about how the City would be dealing with that different surface. Ms. Koscielak stated that they
can take a look at the subsurface materials and see what they have and perhaps have a portion
of it be taken care of the planned improvements.
Mayor Zerby asked that they do that because it is important for these residents to have an
understanding of what their expectation is when the project is completed.
Councilmember Labadie stated that she is happy that the City is including Minnetrista in the
communications.
Councilmember Siakel asked for clarification of the parameters of the project. She stated that her
understanding is that it is just the main project bid and not the gravel road on Enchanted Point,
but will include taking a look at the two properties on Enchanted Point to see what type of materials
and surfacing was used for their privately paved portion.
CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
JUNE 22, 2020
Page 7 of 10
Mayor Zerby confirmed that this is what the Council had been discussing.
Brian Murdock, 4540 Enchanted Point, asked if there was any further discussion about paving his
road. Mayor Zerby explained that at this point, the Council is not planning to make any changes
to Enchanted Point other than the minor improvement with an otta seal at some time in the future.
Mr. Murdock thanked the Council and noted that he feels the neighbors are all in agreement that
they would like this solution.
Labadie moved, Sundberg seconded, Adopting RESOLUTION NO. 20 -063, "A Resolution
Accepting Bids and Awarding the Contract for the base project for the Enchanted Island
and Shady Island Street Reclamation Project, City Project 18 -11."
Roll Call Vote: Labadie, Johnson, Siakel, Sundberg, Zerby voted Aye. Motion passed.
C. Approve Feasibility Study and Authorize Plans and Specifications for Mary
Lake Outlet, City Project, 19 -09
City Engineer Budde gave an overview of the feasibility study the Mary Lake Outlet project. He
explained that staff is recommending that the City continue to seek the variance from the
Minnehaha Creek Watershed District for changes to the water elevation of Studer Pond. He
stated that they will also be seeking municipal consent from the City of Excelsior. He noted that
he is hopeful that the permitting process through the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District will be
completed by October. He explained that if there are any issues with the permit, it could delay
the construction to late season 2020 or possibility into 2021. He stated that he will make sure to
keep the Council apprised of how things are going with the permitting process so they can plan
accordingly.
Councilmember Siakel stated that she supports finding a solution for Mary Lake. She stated that
she is thinking about the comments from Mr. Brooks about two easements going through their
property and asked staff to work with the residents to limit the overall impact to their property.
Mayor Zerby asked whether the feasibility study needed to be complete before the City could ask
the permitting agencies to move forward. City Engineer Budde explained that the feasibility study
and plans do not need to be fully completed and should be at a point within a few weeks to submit
the information.
Mayor Zerby stated that he had some concerns over how Excelsior will handle this but noted that
he believes they have a similar project coming up that will drain through Shorewood. City
Engineer Budde stated that he is not aware of that plan from Excelsior.
Mayor Zerby asked staff to look into this issue. Planning Director Darling stated that she is aware
of the project that Mayor Zerby is referring to and believes the City of Excelsior has been working
exclusively with the two adjacent property owners and not the City.
Councilmember Labadie thanked City Engineer Budde for his thorough reports and pictures of
directional drilling. She stated that she also has concerns with the potential double easement on
the property referenced by Mr. Brooks. She noted that she believes this is a good permanent
solution for the residents in the area.
CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
JUNE 22, 2020
Page 8 of 10
Siakel moved, Labadie seconded, Adopting RESOLUTION NO. 20 -064, "A Resolution to
Approve Feasibility Study and Authorize Preparation of Plans and Specifications for the
Mary Lake Outlet Project, City Project, 19 -09, while also giving consideration to the request
regarding easement concerns.
Roll Call Vote: Labadie, Johnson, Siakel, Sundberg, Zerby voted Aye. Motion passed.
D. Approve Feasibility Study and Authorize Preparation of Final Plans for
Shorewood Oaks Drainage, City Project 20 -04
City Engineer Budde gave an overview of the feasibility study and plans for the Shorewood Oaks
drainage project. He reviewed the background of the existing situation which was a tile system
installed under the streets. He explained that it was believed to be for sump pump discharge,
footing drains and lowering the ground water and does connect to the sewer system. He gave
examples of several times when the sump pumps have failed, and water has backed up into
nearby basements. He stated that this area was also evaluated as part of the Western Shorewood
Drainage Study. He explained that the proposed improvements are to install a catch basin onto
existing tile near the right -of -way and property line. He stated that this should allow for excess
flows to overflow rim of structure and drain to the street. He noted that they would like to confirm
connection to existing footing drainage via televising. He reviewed the project costs and noted
that there will be no assessments for this project. He stated that the estimate at this stage is two
hundred seventeen thousand dollars. He reviewed the proposed schedule and noted that
construction should begin by mid - September and be substantially complete by November of 2020.
Don Aslesen, 26055 Shorewood Oaks Drive, thanked the Council and City Engineer Budde for
their work on this issue. He stated that he had hired Matt's Plumbing do scoping to take a look at
the line. He stated that he does not believe the catch basin solution will solve the problem at his
property and thinks that it may just need to be capped in his situation. He stated that he is happy
to have a conversation with City Engineer Budde about this situation and share the information
he has been able to gather.
Dave Eisenmann, 26320 Shorewood Oaks Drive, stated that he wanted to echo what Mr. Aslesen
shared. He stated that he really appreciates the City taking action on this issue and thanked City
Engineer Budde for working with him and having conversations about what is going on. He stated
that he is happy to work with the City on coming up with a workable solution. He stated that he
also does not think the catch basin is a solution that will work for his household but is glad they
are planning to investigate other possible solutions, especially by televising the connections. He
reiterated his thanks to the City for working on this problem.
Mr. Aslesen stated that he thinks what has already helped alleviate some of problems was paving
the parking lot at the ballfields and elevating it on the west side.
Siakel moved, Johnson seconded, Adopting RESOLUTION NO. 20 -065, "A Resolution
Approving the Feasibility Study and Authorizing Preparing Plans and Specifications for
the Shorewood Oaks Drainage Project, City Project 20 -04."
Roll Call Vote: Labadie, Johnson, Siakel, Sundberg, Zerby voted Aye. Motion passed.
CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
JUNE 22, 2020
Page 9 of 10
E. Accept Proposal from Total Control for Replacement of Programmable Logic
Controller at Badger Well
Public Works Director Brown stated that this is the last of the programmable logic controls for the
City's wells. He gave a brief overview of how the programmable logic controls work. He stated
the PLC was included for replacement in this year's budget and staff is recommending approval.
Johnson moved, Sundberg seconded, Adopting RESOLUTION NO. 20 -066, "A Resolution
Accepting the Proposal from Total Control Systems, Inc. for Replacement of the PLC at
Badger Well Facility.
Roll Call Vote: Labadie, Johnson, Siakel, Sundberg, Zerby voted Aye. Motion passed.
F. Approve Plans and Specifications and Authorize Advertisement for Bids for
Beverly Drive and Cajed Lane Drainage Project, City Project 20 -03
City Engineer Budde gave an overview of the final plans and specifications for the Beverly Drive
and Cajed Lane Drainage project. He reviewed the updated alignment of the drain tile and plans
to utilize the existing drainage and utility easements. He stated that a portion of it will be open
cut and a portion will be directionally drilled. He noted that the City will need to get right -of -entry
and easements for two properties as part of this project. He noted that if approved, they are
anticipating substantial completion by November 1, 2020 with final restoration by June 1, 2021.
He stated that this is projected to come in significantly under budget.
The Council commended City Engineer Budde for his work on all the upcoming projects in the
City.
Siakel moved, Johnson seconded, Adopting RESOLUTION NO. 20 -067, "A Resolution to
Approve Plans and Specifications and Authorize Advertising for Bids for the Beverly Drive
and Cajed Lane Drainage Project, City Project 20 -03."
Roll Call Vote: Labadie, Johnson, Siakel, Sundberg, Zerby voted Aye. Motion passed.
9. GENERAL /NEW BUSINESS
10. STAFF AND COUNCIL REPORTS
A. Administrator and Staff
1. May 2020 General Fund Budget Report
Finance Director Rigdon gave a brief overview of the May 2020 General Fund budget report. He
noted that building permits are down a bit from last year at this time.
Other
Public Works Director Brown stated that crews are finishing up watermain flushing this week and
will move into patching and tree work.
Planning Director Darling stated that Eddie Station repainting project is finished.
CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
JUNE 22, 2020
Page 10 of 10
B. Mayor and City Council
Councilmember Sundberg expressed her appreciation to the City staff for doing such a dynamite
job amidst the COVID -19 pandemic situation. She noted that she is happy that the City is moving
forward with so many of these Public Works projects.
11. ADJOURN
Sundberg moved, Johnson seconded, Adjourning the City Council Regular Meeting of
June 22, 2020, at 8:54 P.M.
Roll Call Vote: Labadie, Johnson, Siakel, Sundberg, Zerby voted Aye. Motion passed.
ATTEST:
�- %phnifeW Labadie, Acting Mayor
Sandie Thone, City Clerk