Loading...
011492 PK MINCITY OF SHOREWOOD PARK COMMISSION MEETING TUESDAY, JANUARY 14, 1992 M I N U T E S CALL TO ORDER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD 7:00 PM Chairman Andrus called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. i_Lla�2&1`0a Present: Chairman Andrus, Commissioners Lindstrom, Vogel, Dzurak and Christensen; Park Secretary Niccum; Council Liaison Lewis: Chamberlain and Harri, Park Planner's; and Administrator Hurm Absent: Commissioners Wilson and Laberee APPROVAL OF MINUTES Lindstrom moved, Dzurak seconded, to approve the minutes of Tuesday, December 10, 1991, as written. Motion carried - 4/0 - 1 abstain - Christensen. REVIEW OF CITY -WIDE TRAIL PLAN Lewis, Council Liaison, pointed out to the Commission that at the Council meeting of Monday, January 13, 1992, the Council made the decision to stripe Old Market Road as a bike path in order to control the speed limit on said road. Lewis also mentioned the future widening of Covington Road. The Commission expressed concern over this, questioning whether it would have an effect on the amount of fill allowed to complete their park plan for Silverwood Park. Dzurak said the amount of fill allowed is important because if it changes, the tennis courts may have to be moved. Dzurak asked how wide the existing road is, and how wide Old Market Road is. Lewis said the paved surface of Old Market Road is approximately 36' wide and the paved surface of Covington Road, in the area of the park, is approximately 20' wide. Lewis said if the road is widened it would probably be widened toward the park as the City already owns the land. Christensen said he thought the road and the park would be two separate projects. Harri said only 10,000 square feet of fill will be allowed no matter how many projects are involved. He said if the trail was dipped down toward the park, on a lower level, less fill could be used. The Commission filled Chamberlain and Harri in on a previous decision, stating that the Commission wanted the trail on Covington Road separate from the road for safety reasons. SHOREWOOD PARK COMMISSION MINUTES TUESDAY, JANUARY 14, 1992 - Page 2 Christensen said we should work with MnDOT while they are building the road so the park comes out as well as it can. Chamberlain said the City should get the revised trail plan and the park plan to MnDOT soon. Some revisions were made to the trail plan. With the change of running a bike path on- street up Old Market Road, the Commission still wants another segment of the trail to remain on Covington Road in order to be able to continue on to Radisson Road. They also discussed the trail segment running from Silverwood Park to State Highway 7 and the trail portion around the Covington Vine Ridge wetland area. Dzurak said it was mostly under water, and that it had been proposed once before and the neighbors were against the idea. They also discussed MSA requirements of concrete surfacing. Chamberlain said if the City used a bituminous surface, it would cost the City $450,000, if they went with concrete the total cost would be $635,000, the City cost would be $233,000, the rest would be paid by MSA funds. Harri said you have to consider lifetime costs, bituminous usually lasts about 15 years, while concrete lasts about 40 years. He said you generally figure about 20 of the total cost of the trails for maintenance, this includes snow removal and weed removal. Christensen and Lindstrom felt offstreet trails of concrete were safer. This lays out some options for Council consideration. Hurm asked the Commission if they wanted to hold a Public Information meeting. Chamberlain said they could present maps and comment sheets in an informal open house meeting. Harri said Planner Nielsen said new City maps were coming this month and he would like to use these updated maps. Christensen suggested putting the trail map in the newsletter. The Commission decided on Tuesday, March 3, as a trigger date to get the information in to the newspapers, and Tuesday, March 24, as the date for the informational meeting. The meeting will be held from 3:00 PM - 5:00 PM and 7:00 PM to 9:00 PM. Hurm said the City is working on location of all City property, and whether any will be available for sale. SHOREWOOD PARK COMMISSION MINUTES TUESDAY, JANUARY 14, 1992 - Page three Chamberlain and Harri said Spring and early Summer are the most favorable bidding time. REVIEW OF AND TRAINING SESSION OF REFERENDUM QUESTIONNAIRE Administrator Hurm went through the questionnaire with the Commission, and reviewed the questioning procedure. He asked each Commissioner to complete approximately 20 questionnaires by January 22. CHAIRMAN /VICE CHAIRMAN - COUNCIL DECISION TO DELAY NEW APPOINTMENTS Hurm explained that the City Council has decided to advertise any year -end openings on the Park and Planning Commissions in order to give all interested parties in the City an opportunity to apply. They also ask that Commissioners that are up for reappointment write letters to the Council stating their reasons for seeking reappointment. The Council will then meet with all interested parties and make appointments. IDENTIFY ISSUES AND PROBLEMS TO BE ADDRESSED IN 1992 Administrator Hurm said he thought it would be helpful to discuss 4 things: a flow chart showing staff support to the Park Commission; a goals /work plan; a Comprehensive Plan Update; and identification of the 1992 issues and problems. He reviewed drafts of the flow chart showing staff support and a Park Commission Goals Plan, and gave copies to the Commission for review. He also presented them with page 29 of the Comprehensive Plan and a blank list of Issues or Problems facing the Shorewood City Council in 1992 for them to complete (without priority) and return by Friday, February 14. He said the Commission would have to go back to the Comp Plan to see if the site plans agree with the Comp Plan. Christensen said the Commission has used the Comp Plan as a guide. Hurm said the City Planner will be available to work with the Commission in March. Dzurak asked Hurm how much money the Park Commission has to work with in 1992. Hurm said none. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR 1992 Liaisons to City Council See attached sheet - keep for your information Water Survey - Trail Plan Question Lindstrom said the Park Commission was not consulted on the question presented on the survey, and he felt it was SHOREWOOD PARK COMMISSION MINUTES TUESDAY, JANUARY 14, 1992 - Page four biased. Hurm said the Commission was not consulted because the Councilmembers were individually consulted and one of them evidently requested the question. Lewis said he was surprised at the question. Snow Patrol Hurm brought the Park Commission up -to -date on the progress. He said the Snow Patrol is ready to go into effect. All that remains to be done is a training session by the SLMPSD. He explained that a four -page letter of understanding ... to be attached to the ordinance... will be signed by SLMPSD, the Southshore Snowmobile Association, and the City of Shorewood. Manor Park Vandalism Niccum reported that the trailer /warming house at Manor Park was vandalized. Someone cut the window with a glass cutter, tore the phone loose from the pole and ruined the phone, damaged both doors with a crow bar, and stole the fire extinguisher ... which was used to vandalize two cars. Property offer - 25805 Eureka way Hurm explained that a piece of property had been offered for sale to the City as an extension to Freeman Park. City Staff reviewed the offer and recommend against it. The Park Commission agreed with staff. Signs - No Glass Allowed The Commission recommended that Zdrazil choose sign size and colors. Snyder Property across from Freeman Park - Eureka Entrance Niccum said she had talked to Mrs. Snyder, who wondered about the road location, and its original proposed location, and mentioned how dusty it gets. Commission discussed possible paving of the entrance and a portion of the road. ��U7rtili� :i� l'u � y1� Y 11 Dzurak moved, Lindstrom seconded, to adjourn the meeting of Tuesday, January 14, 1992, at 10:40 PM. Motion carried unanimously. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, Susan A. Niccum, Park Secretary 1992 PARK COMMISSIONERS SCHEDULE LIAISONS TO CITY COUNCIL JANUARY FEBRUARY MARCH DZURAK ANDRUS VOGEL APRIL MAY JUNE CHRISTENSEN ANDRUS LABEREE JULY AUGUST SEPTEMBER LABEREE DZURAK CHRISTENSEN OCTOBER NOVEMBER DECEMBER • LINDSTROM VOGEL LINDSTROM CHRISTENSEN DZURAK APRIL JANUARY SEPTEMBER AUGUST LINDSTROM VOGEL OCTOBER MARCH DECEMBER NOVEMBER *CHAIRMAN WILL FILL IN IF NECESSARY LABEREE JUNE JULY ANDRUS FEBRUARY MAY :7 MAYOR Barb Brancel COUNCIL Kristi Stover ' Bob Gagne • Rob Daugherty r - :Daniel Lewis CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD •' SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 • (612) 474 -3236 MEMO TO: nd Planning Commission FROM James C. Hurm, City Administrator DATE: January 3, 1992 RE: Development of a 1992 Planof Action % r : The City Council will be meeting in late February to review problems and issues facing the City of Shorewood in 1992. Part of the exercise they will be undertaking is to catagorize and prioritize these problems and issues as a step in developing action plans. The Park Commission, Planning commission and Department Heads are • asked to spend some time between now and February 14 making a list of problems or issues which should be addressed in 1992. To assist you in organizing your thoughts before discussion and concensus on such a list as a Commission, I have enclosed the issues section of the 1980 Comprehensive'Plan and a discussion Isheet for you to jot S notes on. I hope. to have the lists -of problems and' issues (with no indicated) returned to me by Friday, February 14 so`they can be accumulated and distributed to the City Council for their prioritization. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. JCH.al A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore ISSUES In the preceding sections of this document, the present park and recreation conditions have been identified and probable future demands reviewed. Five issues have surfaced from meetings with the Parks Commission and this study's analysis which are and will continue to be the prevalent issues for City leaders. These park and recreation issues are: 1 . What role will cooperative programs play in the provision of facilities for Shorewood's residents? 2. Given the growth potential of Shorewood over the next decade or two, what expansion of parkland would be appropriate? 3. Given the growth potential of Shorewood, what type of facilities developmen would be appropriate? 4. Recognizing the fragmented nature of the City, what trail systems should be planned for to link parts of the City to each other and to park sites? 5. What implementation techniques should be used to implement a park and trail acquisition and development plan? In the following chapters of this section, these issues are discussed and recom- mendations presented . The material prepared to this point is reproduced in the document to record the underlying analysis methods which are supportive of the recommendations. Users of this document should at least became familiar with the rationale used. In the event that the projections (assumptions) of the study prove to be grossly inaccurate, the plan while still usable will be a poor response to the park and recreational demands of the City. Periodic updates (each five years) are recommended. pg. 29 of the 1980 Comprehensive Plan - City of Shorewood • ISSUES OR PROBLEMS FACING THE SHOREWOOD CITY COUNCIL IN 1992 • • Chairman, Park Commission Date • 1992 Park Commission Goals Draft 1 1/8/92 • Reduce consultant fees • Improve the quality of Commission input in the development of the operating budget • Continue improvement of information flow to the Commission on • projects and budgets • Update the Park and open space element to the City Comprehensive Plan • Develop and begin implementing an action plan to pass an improvement referendum • Develop a second option to the Park CIP with no referendum funding • Continue improvement of meeting efficiency SHOREWOOD PARK COMMISSION STAFF s mib CONSULTING ASSISTANCE • Park Specialty Planning • Landscape Architecture • Building Design • Specialty Design PLANNING DIRECTOR • Comp Plan Update • Plan Commission Liaison • Park Planning SECRETARY • Commission Minutes • Commission Update • Secretarial Support PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR • Park Maintenance • Trail Maintenance • Operating Budget • Minor Construction STAFF ENGINEER • Project Manager r Park CIP • Cost Est /Budgets • Design Project ADMINISTRATOR • Coordinates Staff Support • Finance and Budget • Information Flow PARK COMMISSION c:\JIMHURM\STAFSUPT.PK 1/10/92 sn MAYOR Barb Brancel COUNCI L Kristi Stover Bob Gagne Rob Oaugherty Daniel Lewis CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD 9 SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 • !6121 474.3236 MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council t FROM: James C. Hurm, City Administrator DATE: January 23, 1992 RE: January 27, 1992 - Work Session The following is a proposed schedule for City Council work sessions for 1992. All but the August 3rd work session on the 1993 operating budget are scheduled for the second regular meeting night of the month. Unforeseen proposals or circumstances might require other meeting nights. It is the Councils prerogative to set the schedule as we go. January 27 - Meet jointly with the Planning Commission to review • the work plan for updating the Comprehensive Plan. Who will do what, when? What does the City Council expect of the Planning Commission? Staff? Itself? February 24 - This work session is not directly related to the Comprehensive Plan update. Rather the City Council will develop a list of issues and problems facing the City (with input from the Planning and Park Commissions, and staff) and come to a concensus as to which issues and problems should be focused on in 1992 ... Set priorities for the City. March 23 - Meet jointly with Planning Commission, Park Commission and staff on goals and objectives for the Comprehensive Plan process and for top priority issues identified in February. April 27 - CIP (1993 -1997) Begin work on issues identified in our current CIP: • Water - develop and review alternatives • Review City Hall area plan (post - Public Works Improvements) • Surface drainage utility proposal • MSA roads - begin process of review • Special assessments - review alternatives for street recon- struction. BRING YOUR CIP: A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore �, Memo to Council - Schedule 1992 May 26 - Meet jointing with Planning Commission — Comprehensive Plan review: • Review Policy Plans for transportation and community facilities • Continue review of MSA system June 22 - CIP - Continue analyzing issues identified in the current CIP. Direct staff based on policies being developed in the Comprehensive Plan Review. July 27 - Meet jointly with Planning Commission: • Land Use Policy Plan • Review Environmental Policies • Review Transportation and Community Facilities Plans with emphasis on CIP projects August 3 - (First Monday) This is a proposed special work session on the 1993 Operating Budget. , August 24 - CIP - Concensus on direction for the 1993 -1997 CIP document. September 28 - Meet jointly with Planning Commission: • Finalize Transportation Plan • Review Community Facilities Plan to -date • Review Environmental Plan to -date • Review Land Use Plan to -date _ October 26 — Review final draft of 1993 -1997 CIP document. November 23 Meet jointly with Planning Commission: • Finalize Land Use Plan • Finalize Environmental Plan • Review Community Facilities Plan to -date cc: Planning Commission Park Commission JCH /al MAYOR - "Barb Brancel COUN'CI L Kristi Stover Bob Gagne Rob Daugherty Daniel Lewis ' r CITY OF SHOREWOOD' 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD • SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 (612) 474 -3236 January 10, 1992 To: Park Commission From: .Tames C. Hurm, City Administrator Re: Property. Address: 25805 Eureka Way Sine: Approximately 5 acres The Park Commission should be aware that Mr. Chris Ritts, owner of the property, and.Noe1 Freeman, Real Estate Agent, have both beer: in City Hall regarding selling this piece _of ; property to the City. " The property is listed,at $124,000 but Ritts said perhaps a deal could be worked out with the city. There was some discussion regarding the current driveway. Eureka Way is not a public road. In order to sell the property, a,n easement had to be obtained from the Hennepin ,'County R- g=ona • Railroad Autho -city They granted an easement over the track until " such time as Light Rail Transit would go through, at this tCic ;: fey would grant an easement down the south side of the tracks, going east to Smithtown Road. Staff and Mark Koegler have discussed this issue and feel _that it would be of marginal benefit to the City. It is not consisted- with our C'IP and has access problems. Our Park money could` be better spent elsewhere. The Park Commission should discuss the issue to determine, it concurs with staff • A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka`s South Shore V � Y C N r of t. c�>r� 4` � tf � f `rr•• �� O SUe it ice)!♦ °" c p •y, 2isir� _ A'oU14 w 0T 10� IN RRY t :. CARE ur , t - f Rf tt1 v u t rj � II►l�Q , f ` m � Z7 et" n• rrtrt `� tr. n .•.. a �/ _ O — .� x. • t► : I F •r .. lI ff . Y Odlp1 A� �rlwlA �gS 3 !Y � �• iratl or Lao arm ~ C • Y 1 y - n�. f• n w O Z tp 1 0 I `� N •i r O rn • r� � 1 • 't .. �/ r 67 14-1 at r0 is � u ot, ft ft t � I Y p w i n./ I I o, cn 1 001 o' . T C zm Tx O 1 O v M � AVM V)1RM"'AYM YA3MFl3"'AYM O m T .fit m •d.. } T ' SEC.3. T.117,R.23 - "311M* ' � 1 do L_ N EW n I�fl e_ >>> . ' Z' . u FBT. 1 TDT: ti HET: 0 S °i L: RAMBLE FIN: • INFORMATION DEEMED RELIABLE BUT NOT GUARANTEED 25805 EUREKA WAY TAX $3028 191/N MAP NO -38 MUN SHOREWOOD ZIP 557 Z 1 TWA $3028 AR 589 SUB 1 DIV I COU HENN ASB$O ASP N 1 1 LOT c ACRES IR R E GULA R c i H(J F i / vi / N i/� 1954 -N V� 1 v i AC: I4 1 � ILL L.r, �� AGR J, 1 �J 1 OFti 1 / 1! IV 1L / J r• ITHTOW 1 R OA D TO EUR ! V 'i i� HI N I 0T, ^•� 99 D I 4 a M ,�,.•+h R��I�L. 1 EJREF�:1 -� WA � � LI• -+5T HOME 0;. F.� •.�, }_� / �. e ACRES ;gyp^, O I N I NG HENNEP I N. OO RE CR EA TIO N ,�+ r,�, .�..� r,..lJ J > 1♦ � UI• "� Y TRAIL AND 55 ACRE CI F'1ARK. OU I ET END OF ROAD LOCA . GLEAN EFFI HOME WITH HARDWOOD FLOORS THROUGHOUT.LBG FLAGSTONE FPL I LIVING RM , MATURE PINES AND MAPLES. SEE SUPPLEMENT 9/1 LGL NORTHERLY 210 FT LOT 64 AUDITORS SURD I V i Z _ HcNN CTY PID 3211723410001 WAT WELL L r,r 0 L ni 1 n SEW C ONNECT 1 20X3 i J M JJ�1 1 •T l= I nIRC TR:r H � F��'N A r•M ri i T L ci M i �� � 11: 1 : 1'Y /� _ 1 ` L. �� 1� 111E vv � ITT , l�1 � C0 I� � Tf i�.J1 , �11�1 . � n DR M lNC B M 1 XO9 HEA 1_ /PR i l 1 ` 0``00 IN : 10.5 %, FR 38 l l 1 l;. 0" ". T S, I -, EXF FHr, o D:.! r•;S KT M" 1 i t OS 4L-i ESM F PIN I V z 0 2 C IN 2MA N DK 16X14 GAR 2 ASSUME WITH RELEASE, BBT N MBT N TR NEW! SDN 276 SOP 470 -3 400 F;S Z 1100 A!_•F 0 EGF 0 FSF 1 102 • AGN NOW ELL F. EE i -- - �, 75 ` � 2.75 ER ELF �:�cM:•i:'J 1 _,�_•'���7 ,_,� {'�. / J Jrl OFFICE RE /MAX A CTION ST l 01 05 PH"-'•'1 1 n APT 474 - 1217 w.11 �..� RE/ MAX h"11�. � _ •I v•C�� — Gl � 1 1 •ti i��r '� �1� REAL ESTATE TRANSFER DISCLOSURE STATEMENT This for, approved by the Minnesota Association d REALTORS" Minnesota Assodedon at REALTORSSe disclaims any liabil out of use or mW se d this form. 1. Date 2. Page of Pages • 3. This disclosure statement concerns the real property located in the City of Spa t`( -I r^'n 4. County of State of Minnesota, described as 2- c3Q e t'E se? S This disclosure is not a warranty of any kind by the Sellers) or any Agertt(s) 6. representing any Party(s) in this transaction, and is not a substitute for any inspections or warranties the Party(s) may wish m obtain 7. BUYER(S) AND SELLER(S) MAY WISH TO 013TAIN PROFESSIONAL ADVICE AND /OR INSPECTIONS 8. OF THE PROPERTY AND TO PROVIDE FOR APPROPRIATE PROVISIONS IN A CONTRACT BETWEEN 9. BUYER(S) AND SELLER(S) WITH RESPECT TO ANY ADVICERNSPECTIONS/DEFECTS. 10. SELLERS INFORMATION: The Seller discloses the following information with the knowledge that even though this is not 11. a warranty, prospective buyers may rely on this information in deciding whether and on what terms to purchase the subject 12. property. The Sellers) authorizes any Agent(s) representing any party(s) in this transaction to provide a copy of this statement 13. to any person or entity in connection with any actual or anticipated sale of the property. 14. The following are representations made by the Seller(s) to the extent of the Seller(s) actual knowledge. This information 15. is a disclosure and is not intended to be part of any contract between the Buyer and Seller. 16. A. GENERAL INFORMATION: 17. (1) When did you purchase or build the home? 18. (2) Have you lived in this home for the past 12 months? if Yes No 19. (3) Has there been any flood or other disaster(s) at the property? Ye No 20. If yes, give details of what happened and when: 21. 22. 23. (4) Has t structure ever been altered? (For example, additions, altered roof lines, changes to load bearing-walls.) 24. K/ Yes No If yes, please specify what was done, when and by whom (owner or (;ontractor). 25. 26. 27. (5) Is the property suitable for year round use? `,' Yes No stated in comments below. All Items listed 26. B. STRUCTURAL SYSTEMS: Do any of the following conditions currently exist or have they previously ex isted? 29. (Give details to any question answered "yes ".) YE 0 YES NO YES NO 30. 31. (1) THE BASEMENT (a) Foundation problem Yes No C (e) Drain tiling problem Yes No 32. (b) Flooding Yes No (f) Cracked floors/walls Yes No V 33. (c) Wet Walls Yes No (g) Sewer backup Yes No 34. (d) Leakage/seepage Yes No (h) Other Yes No 35. Give details to any question answered "yes ": 56. Freezer Central Vacuum 36. 37. 38. (2) THE ROOF? (Give details to any question answered "yes ".) 39. (a) What is the age of the roofing material? S - Comments: 40. (b) Has there ever been interior damage from ice buildup? I Yes No 41. (c) Has there ever been any leakage or other problems? Yes -�, No 42. (d) Have there ever been any repairs or replacement made to the roof? Yes No 43. Give details to any question answered "yes ": 44. 45 46. C. SPECIAL •COMMENTS ON HEATING, PLUMBING, ELECTRICAL AND MECHANICAL SYSTEMS: 47. The following are in working order and shall be at time of closing unless otherwise stated in comments below. All Items listed 48 below are not necessarily part of this sale. 60. 49. YE 0 YES NO YES NO 50. Range Intercom Central Heating System 51. Oven _ Garage Door Openers - - Central Air Conditioning 52. Hood A and all controls Wall Air Conditioners) - 53. Refrigerator rner► _Ag::fo _ . Ventilating Fans/Fixtures Furnace Humidifier - 54. Microwave Oven Security System Electronic Air Purifier _ - 55. Dishwasher Smoke Detectors - Supplemental Heater - - 56. Freezer Central Vacuum Solar Collectors - - 57. Washer Door Bells Fireplace Equipment - 58. Dryer Window Treatments Fireplace and/or Inserts - 59. Trash Compactor Water Heater / _Z - Woodbuming Stove -- l - 60. Garbage Disposal 71 Sump Pump Incinerator 61. Plumbing Systems - Drain Tiling '�= Water Softener - 62. Toilet Mechanisms Private Sewer System - _ Sprinkler System - - 63. Private Well / Attached Antenna and 64. Cables _ Electrical Systems - 65. pool and Equipment = -- ' Other - r I ( 1 t :7 REAL ESTATE TRANSFER DISCLOSURE STATEMENT 66. Address 67. Page 2 -_ 68. Unused Well: Is there a well on the property which is no longer in use? ❑Yes two 69. If yes, has it been sealed according to State Regulations MSA 156A? Oyes ONO 70. Comments: t - 71. Contaminated Well: Is there a well on the property containing contaminated wateR_Yes 72. Date well water last tested for contaminants: .k ` Comments: 73, D. LAND USE AND PROPERTY CONDITION: 74. Are you aware of any of the follo g existing: 75. Encroachments? Yes- No�/ Soil problems? Yes_ N0-2:.- / 76. Diseased Trees? Yes_ No Rodent Infestation? Yes_ No_✓ Insect Infestation? Yes No . 77. Restrictions or Reservations on the use of the property? Yes No 78. Easements other than utility or drainage easements which do not interfere with present improvements? Yes No 79. Is the property located in a designated flood plain? Yes No 80. Comments: 81. 82. 83. E. INSULATION DISCLOSURE: 84. Does the insulation in the property contain urea formaldehyde foam? Yes No 85. Date insulation installed: �5 Type: " ComparY• 86. Comments: 87. F. OTHER KNOWN DEFECTS: 88. Are there -ariy other known defects in or on the property? Yes No V If yes, explain below: 89. = = - - -� 90. l ! 91. 92. 93,G. SELLER'S STATEMENT (To be signed at time of listing) 94. We/ owner(s) of the property at ' & :S "� uz�'« 95. acknowledge the above_Real Estate Transfer Disclosur ,- Statement and give permission io Listing Broker to disc�ise 96. this information,to:•the prospggive buyers. 97. ; �. ✓% 98. H. BUYER'S ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: (To be signed at time of purchase agreement) 99. We /I, the Buyers) of the property at 100. do acknowledge receipt of the Real Estate Transfer Disclosure Statement and agree that no representations 101. regarding.the condition of the property have been made, other than those made above. LISTING BROKER AND 102. AGENTS MAKE NO REPRESENTATIONS AND ARE NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY CONDITIONS EXISTING.IN 103. THE PROPERTY. 104. Oro" (D." 105. I. SELLER'S ACKNOWLEDGEMENT (To be signed at time of purchase agree _ t 106. AS OF THE DATE OF THE ACCEPTANCE OF THE PURCHASE AGREEMENT, ell, the Sellers) of the above 107. property, agree that the condition of the property is the same as noted above an III be in proper working order 108.• on date of closing, except for the changes indicated above and dated: 109. rs.n ro..r (s+n 110. WRETDS (5/88) ORIGINAL COPY TO LISTING BROKER; COPIES M SELL ; ;BUYER, SELLING BROKER. ' - Q r r - ' .-'