Loading...
102792 PK MIN CITY OF SHOREWOOD COUNCIL CHAMBERS PARK COMMISSION MEETING 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD TUESDAY, OCTOBER 27, 1992 7:00 PM MINUTES CALL TO ORDER Chair Wilson called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. ROLL CAhL Present: Chairman Wilson, Commissioners Lindstrom, Laberee, Dzurak, Mast, McCarty and Andrus; Council Liaison Lewis; Administrator Hurm; and Park Planner Mark Koegler. David Anderson and Gary Dressel from South Tonka Little League were also present. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Mr. Andrus brought the the attention of the Commission that the September 29 minutes..page 3 under Silverwood Park Pond Size...should be be changed to read (last sentence) "The Commission was very clear in their statement that they agreed (with the exception of Mr. Andrus),... Laberee moved, McCarty seconded, to approve the minutes of Tuesday, September 29, 1992 as corrected. Motion carried unanimously. 1 . REVIEW OF SURFACE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM GRANT APPLICATION Emphasis The trail, which is part of a city wide trail plan, constitutes a significant walkway/bikeway transportation link between a developed residential area, a neighborhood park and a future commercial area. The trails would also connect to a recently completed signalized intersection at Trunk Highway 7 which is a major barrier dividing the north and south sections of the city. Trail Segments Walkway: Old Market Road - 1/2 mile - $24,000 Bikeway: Covington Road - 1 mile - $50,000 T.H. 7 South Service Road between Covington & Old Market Road - 1/5 mile - $10,000 CITY OF SHOREWOOD PARK COMMISSION MINUTES TUESDAY, OCTOBER 27, 1992 - Page two Total Cost: $84,000 20% city = $16,800 + design and administration 80% STP = $67,200 Action needed • Park Commission needs to designate Old Market Road as an off-street walkway and as an on-street bikeway. • Decision whether or not to include segment in Silverwood Park for funding. It was included separately. Laberee moved, seconded by McCarty, to amend the Trail Plan to change the Old Market Road designation to both on-street bikeway and off-street walkway. Motion passed unanimously. 2A. LITTLE LEAGUE — BENNETT FAMILY PARK REQUEST Bennett Family Park's letter of October 9, 1992 requested financial support from the City of Shorewood. They said since there are approximately 200 Shorewood children participating at Bennett, they were requesting $2,000. They also stated that their affordable fees of $30 per child were held at this rate by the Board of Directors and covered annual Park operating costs (labor, taxes, insurance, field prep, utilities, maintenance, etc). They said capital expenditures must come from concession stand profits, advertising and donations. Wilson said perhaps Shorewood should explain that we have our own fund raising problems and do not have excess funding to support a private system. It was the consensus of the Park Commission to request a letter be drafted denying their request for funds for Bennett Family Park for City Council review. 2B. LITTLE LEAGUE - DISUSSION ON FIELD #2 Anderson said about 15 years ago South Tonka could have had the field but they only had one or two teams. Babe Ruth did not use the field so Chanhassen started using it. A very small minority of the kids were from Shorewood. There was a contract for Babe Ruth use but it expires in 1992. CITY OF SHOREWOOD PARK COMMISSION MINUTES TUESDAY, OCTOBER 27, 1992 - Page three In order to have the field ready for the 1993 season, South Tonka Little League would like to convert the existing Babe Ruth Field (#2) to a Little League field. In order to have the field ready for the 1993 season it would be necessary to scrape and drag the infield of grass and reset bases to the standard 60' little league specs, reset old fences or install a new fence 200' to the outfield to meet Little League specs. McCarty moved, seconded by Dzurak, to recommend that the City Council allow the South Tonka Little League to change Field #2 from "Babe Ruth Field" to a "multi-purpose Little League Field", including the option of moving the fence at the discretion of the Little League. The motion passed unanimously. 2C. LITTLE LEAGUE - DESIGN CONCESSION BUILDING Mr. Dressel and Mr. Anderson reviewed the design of the proposed "Concession Building" to be located in the Little League area of Freeman Park. The Building Inspector, City Planner, and Park Planner had reviewed the plans. Administrator Hurm mentioned that the plan is consistent with the Park Capital Improvement Program (PCIP), which places one large building near fields #4, #5 and S6, a picnic shelter, and a small concession storage building in the Little League area. Anderson said concessions would consist of "over the counter" products (i.e. candy bars, pop), nothing elaborate. He said there would also be a storage area to store equipment. He said estimated cost is between $15,000 and $20,000, they are waiting for bids to come in. Anderson said they have had some contributions from local businesses, offers for lumber and other services. They have also been saving money for this project. He said they might ask the City for help regarding water for a faucet on the outside of the building and a water fountain. Hurm said there is a water fountain for that area in the PCIP. He also said the building will be built out of the same block as the dugouts so it will blend in. Anderson said they are still trying to get some assistance to purchase the Wagner property, if they could purchase that they would really have a nice Little League complex. Hurm said if the Referendum does not pass, the City will have to look at priorities and may not get water to the building in 1993. Anderson asked for an opinion on security lighting. The Commission recommended it. Lindstrom moved, seconded by Mast, to recommend to the City Council, through the Planning Commission, approval of the proposed building and its location between Field #1 and Field #2 near the current restroom location. Motion passed unanimously. CITY OF SHOREWOOD PARK COMMISSION MINUTES TUESDAY, OCTOBER 27, 1992 - Page four BREAK 7:50PM - 8:15 PM 3. REVIEW OF PARK DEDICATION FEES FOR ELDERLY HOUSING PROJECTS The Planner's memorandum of October 23, 1992 was reviewed and discussed by the Park Commission. The Planning Commission'suggestion was that the fees not be waived, but rather reduced, that the fees should be charged on the basis of the current zoning of the property without the density "bonus". Administrator Hurm explained how the reduction of fees works. The Commission felt that each case has to be looked at separately, the degree of waiving fees might depend on type of housing....assisted, ambulatory, apartment, or step-down housing not necessarily for seniors. Dzurak moved, seconded by McCarty, to recommend Following discussion, to the City Council that Park Dedication Fees should not be reduced below the amount we would receive under the current zoning; and that furthermore, the City Council should waive fees only to the extent determined necessary by the City Council to meet ita objectives with respect to attracting senior housing projects. Motion parsed unanimously . 4. DISCUSSION ON IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PARK PLAN There was general discussion on the makeup of the sub-committees. The members of the Commission indicated that they would be happy to attempt to coordinate sub-committee meetings. 5. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR Silverwood Park Pond Hurm said the contractor has been contacted. He wanted to know if there was any problem with doing the work in the winter after the water has frozen. Hurm told him it was fine to do it then. The Commission and Hurm said the side hill has to be redone, it has ruts in it. Wilson said he was amazed that no erosion control was used regarding seeding. Trail Dzurak said Gagne mentioned that the ag lime is washing off the trail. Hurm said money is budgeted each year for upkeep. Dzurak suggested Public Works Director Zdrazil talk to Gagne. Hurm said Hennepin County Parks are considering taking over the trail, possibly maintenance, possibly control...which would include snowmobile use. CITY OF SHOREWOOD PARK COMMISSION MINUTES TUESDAY, OCTOBER 27, 1992 - Page five 6. REPORTS Manor Park Warming House Dzurak explained to the Park Commission what had taken place at the Planning Commission meeting. Dzurak said some Planning Commission members were upset because we kept coming back for a one year permit, and that they didn't feel the Park Commission priorities are in the right order. They voted it down 4 to 3. The final decision is up to the City Council. Hurm said the Council voted for a C.U.P. 5/0. 7. ADJOURNMENT Laberee moved, seconded by McCarty, to adjourn the meeting at 9:05 PM. Motion passed unanimously. C:\MINUTES.PK\921027