Loading...
012898 PK MINCITY OF SHOREWOOD PARK COMMISSION MEETING WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 28, 1998 MINUTES I. CONVENE PARK COMMISSION MEETING COUNCIL CHAMBERS 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD 7:30 P.M. Vice Chair Dallman called the meeting to order at 7:31 p.m. A. ROLL CALL Present: Chair Puzak (arrived at 7:40 p.m.); Commissioners Colopoulos, Bensman, Dallman, Arnst, Themig and Cochran; Administrator Jim Hurm; Park Planner Mark Koegler B. REVIEW AGENDA Vice Chair Dallman read the Agenda for January 28, 1998. Dallman approved, Themig seconded. Motion passed 7/0. 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Park Commission Minutes of January 13, 1998 Dallman moved, Bensman seconded, to approve the minutes as amended on Page 3, Item 9, Paragraph 1 change to read, "The consensus of the Commission was to continue taking turns as Park Liaison to the Council and to inform who will be attending that meeting in their packet ". Page 4, Item B, Paragraph 3, change to read, "Chair Colopoulos requested the issue of a possible skate park be brought back for consideration on a new future agenda and to invite Matt Pike back ". Motion passed 7/0. 3. PREPARATION FOR THE PARK/TRAIL FORUM OF FEBRUARY 19, 1998 A. NEED FOR AND MEANS OF CONDUCTING A SURVEY Administrator Hurm reviewed the park/trail surveys that were included in the packet. Koegler explained that the advantage of a survey is that it is one more tool to use. It will be a third party, scientific survey. It was determined the questions or areas of inquiry should be as follows: PARK COMMISSION MINUTES JANUARY 28, 1998 - PAGE 2 • Type of trails - integrated vrs. segregated segments • Trail design • Physical characteristics • Environmental impact • Off street /on street • What are destinations of pedestrians, activity, age • How would you use a trail • Demographics • Value, quality of life questions • What do residents use parks for • User fees (should parks be funded by property tax, user fees, organizations) • Safety • Property value questions • Benefit to residents • Green space activities Koegler explained that the company he is recommending to conduct the survey will put together the questions. Commissioner Puzak stated the goal of the survey is to ask the community questions that help City officials determine the ability of a trail system and attributes of the trail system. Additionally, the survey would ask questions of residents about other recreational facilities that are underneath the scope of park/recreation department. Koegler recommended hiring Decision Resources to conduct the telephone survey. The cost is estimated to be around $6,000. Colopoulos moved, Arnst seconded, to direct staff to prepare to consider including an agreement with Decision Resources for professional marketing services to provide a telephone survey on trails within the City. Motion passed 7/0. B. PUBLICITY FOR FORUM The consensus was to send out postcards to all Shorewood residents announcing the open forum to be held on February 19 at the Southshore Center. Commissioners were encouraged to urge residents to attend. C. DISCUSSION OF FORUM FORMAT Koegler explained the handout regarding the purpose and process of the forum. This handout is attached to and made a part of these minutes. The four exercises that will be done at the forum are: PARK COMMISSION MINUTES JANUARY 28, 1998 - PAGE 3 1. Opening exercise - initial reaction to what people think about Shorewood 2. Definition exercise -define the existing characteristics that make Shorewood what it is today 3. Visioning exercise -focus on identifying elements of the community's vision for the future. 4. Characteristics exercise -will focus on evaluating the characteristics that were identified in exercise 3. 4. REVIEW OF MEETING DATES Administrator Hurm reviewed a timeline of upcoming meetings. There were no revisions. PARK COMMISSION MINUTES JANUARY 28, 1998 - PAGE 4 5. ADJOURNMENT Colopoulos moved, Cochran seconded, to adjourn the meeting at 10:22 p.m. Motion passed 7/0. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED Twila Grout Parks Secretary Community Visioning /Input Meeting -February 19, 1998 Purposes of the Community Input Meeting: 1. Provide a forum to gain an understanding of the community's future vision and specifically, how parks and trails fit into or relate to that vision. 2. Gain an understanding of park and trail issues that are important to the community. 3. Gain an understanding of the facilities that people want to see included in the completion of the Shorewood park system. 4. Help in assembling a list of individuals who could potentially serve on the Citizen Review Group. The purpose of the Community Input Meeting is not to: • Solve the trail controversy n Shorewood. .That task is the responsibility of the Park Commission and City Council with the advice and assistance of the Citizen Review Group. 0 • Discussion Guide Community Visioning/Input Meeting February 19,1998 Park & Trail Planning, City of Shorewood "What Do We Want Our Community to Be and What is the Role of Parks & Trails ?" 1. Opening Exercise — This exercise will be structured as a "warm up" to get an initial reaction to what people like about Shorewood and perhaps, more importantly, it will allow them to get to know each other. 2. Dermition Exercise This exercise will define the existing characteristics that make Shorewood what it is today. The format of this exercise will involve some individual thinking and random group reporting. 3. Visioning Exercise — This exercise will focus on identifying elements of the community's vision for the future. It will include both small group discussions and large group reporting. • The results of this session will yield a random listing of vision elements that are associated with all aspects of the community. The responses will be separated into two categories: 1) park and trail elements and 2) other elements. Only the items identified as part of the park and trail set will be further discussed 4. Characteristics Exercise — This portion of the program will focus on evaluating the characteristics that were identified in exercise 3. The evaluation will include a group and if necessary, an individual ranking of their importance. During the meeting, participants will have an opportunity to note comments that are park specific on sheets that are posted along with the master plan for each park site. Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. is