082499 PK MINCITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD
PARK COMMISSION COUNCIL CHAMBERS
TUESDAY, AUGUST 24, 1999 7:30 P.M.
MINUTES
1. CONVENE PARK COMMISSION MEETING
Co -chair Arnst called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m.
A. Roll Call
Present: Co- chairs Dallman and Arnst; Commissioners, Puzak and Themig;
Administrator Jim Hurm; City Engineer Larry Brown
Absent: Commissioners Bensman, Colopoulos and Berndt; Councilmember Zerby
B. Review Agenda
Co -chair Arnst asked to move item #6 (User Fees) to be discussed after #4 (Reports) to
give it priority.
Themig moved and Dallman seconded to approve the agenda as amended. Motion
passed 4/0.
2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. Park Commission Meeting Minutes of August 10, 1999
Action was taken later. See page 3.
3. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR
There were no matters from the floor.
4. REPORTS
There were no reports. Arnst asked if there had been any follow -up to the Island
neighborhood walk. Engineer Brown said some mowing and trimming had been done. A
follow -up letter is in process.
Arnst asked Commissioner Themig if he had worked on the presentation to the Park
Foundation yet. Themig said no.
Park Commission
August 24, 1999
Page 2
6. USER FEES
Co -chair Arnst suggested a brainstorming approach for this very large item. She proposed
to: 1) Get all potential ideas on the board and list the pros and cons of each, 2) Figure an
estimate of the amount of money each would generate, 3) Consider a "target" for where
the money would be spent, 4) Choose the preferred options for where funds would be
used, and then, 5) Decide on steps to be taken with that information. When asked if the
funds would be used for capital improvements or for operating, it was stated that the
funds would be applied to both. These are the ideas that were listed:
1 Foundation fundraising
2 User Fees—Sports Organizations— Tournament Fees
3 Concession— (Sales & Rental)
4 Parking (meters, permits, kiosks, tournament parking)
5 Revenue from cell towers
6 Title transfer fees
7 Impact fees (park dedication fees)
8 Grants
9 Philanthropic donations (including land)
10 Business sponsorship (corporate sector) / advertising
11 General city funds
12 Liquor profits from stores
13 Liquor permits for park events
14 Lawful Gaming
15 Vending Machines
16 Park Event and Shelter Rentals
17 Youth Programming
The Commission discussed the list with pros, cons, and points about each of the ideas.
The detailed listing of each is on a separate document called "Options for Financing Park
Improvements" and is attached to and made a part of these Minutes.
They also discussed how and when to present the information to the Park Foundation. It
was agreed to invite the Park Foundation, and each organization's president or committee
chair, to a special meeting on Tuesday, September 28. A letter will be sent in advance to
explain the content and goals of the meeting. The Foundation representatives will be
asked to offer other suggestions for revenue sources and for their commitment to the
programs that they would like to support. A scheduled time line for construction of the
park structure and other projects will also be presented to the Foundation in order to
establish goals for fund- raising.
Commissioner Themig pointed out that 2/3 of the Park Foundation are representatives of
non - sports organizations. There needs to be focus toward their interests as well.
Park Commission
August 24, 1999
Page 3
2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. Park Commission Meeting Minutes of August 10, 1999
Puzak moved and Themig seconded to approve the Minutes as presented. Motion
passed 4/0.
5. REVIEW OBJECTIVES FOR OPERATING BUDGET (MARK THEMIG)
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
Five new objectives are proposed for the 2000 Park Operating Budget objectives. The
Commission briefly read the list.
Puzak moved and Dallman seconded to accept the Year 2000 Objectives as
submitted by Commissioner Mark Themig and listed in a memo dated August 16,
1999. The motion passed unanimously.
The CIP will be on the agenda for the September 14, 1999 Park Commission meeting.
Members were asked to bring the packet information on Trail Funding Sources back with
them to that meeting.
7. TRAILS PLANNING PROCESS
A. Review Island Neighborhood Walk on July 24
See page 1, item #4, REPORTS.
B. Covington / Vine Hill Status
A letter dated August 1, regarding a request for concrete sidewalk (rather than bituminous
surface) was presented to the Commission. The letter was from six residents living along
Vine Hill Road who seem to believe that the City has decided on a bituminous surface and
they are objecting to that choice. Yet, a formal decision has not been made on the "zebra
policy."
Engineer Brown stated that plans are being prepared by the consultant, but are delayed
due to serious illness. He suggested that a position not be taken until a concept plan is put
together. The letter from residents indicates that the Park Commission's last response was
not perceived correctly. Brown recommends a response to clarify the situation should be
written right away, but an actual policy needs to be considered at a later date.
Co -chair Arnst asked Brown to draft a letter explaining why concrete was used along Old
Market Road and send a draft to Co -chair Dallman and herself for review. Brown
recommended the policy discussion be included on the next meeting agenda. Themig
Park Commission
August 24, 1999
Page 4
asked that the consultant also provide information about the life expectancy of cement
over bituminous. An effective response will require real data.
C. Smithtown West Status
Engineer Brown stated that the first "hurdle" is being addressed by the city attorney who
is preparing a report on rights of way issues. It will hopefully be presented at the next
Council meeting. Artist said updates on each of the trail segments will be on the next Park
Commission agenda
D. Plan of Action for Fall
Co -chair Artist asked if the Commission wants to schedule anything else for fall at this
time. It was agreed to discuss the schedule at the September 14 meeting. Administrator
Hurm asked if they wish to consider a doing a neighborhood walk at the Old Market Road
crossing. They said it had already been done. The Commission will do a neighborhood
walk on Howard's Point Road, Edgewood Road and Grant Lorenz Road on Saturday,
October 2 at 9:30 a.m.
8. REVIEW PRELIMINARY DESIGN OF MAGIC SQUARE
Engineer Brown reported that he talked to the tennis court contractor who has done this
type of square in the City of Chanhassen. He proposes the same finish as the tennis court
surface to be done on the Cathcart basketball court.
Commissioner Puzak asked if all of these squares have some preconceived game so kids
can't just make up games as they go along. His point is to provide activities that foster
creativity and facilities that appeal to "free spirits" who are unlikely to join some regulated
sports team or activity. Administrator Hurm said that is the whole idea of the magic
square. Artist agreed, offering an example of how neighborhood children play their own
version of such games.
Dallman moved to authorize Engineer Brown to proceed with the implementation of
the "magic square" as presented. Themig seconded and the motion passed 4/0.
Themig asked if the September 13 agenda would include a review of the CIP for trails and
parks. It will.
9. CONSIDER REPLACEMENT OF CHUCK COCHRAN AS PARK
COMMISSION REPRESENTATIVE TO THE PARK FOUNDATION
Item to be tabled until the September 14 meeting. There was discussion about the verbal
resignation of Commissioner Bill Colopoulos. It was agreed to hold discussion until an
official letter of resignation is received.
Park Commission
August 24, 1999
Page 5
10. REVIEW OF TO DO LIST
The commissioners agreed that progress is being made. No details were discussed.
11. OLD BUSINESS
A. Review Recycling Memo
In the absence of Commissioner Berndt, discussion is tabled until the next meeting. There
was no other old business.
12. NEW BUSINESS
Commissioner Puzak reported that, as a result of the recent article in the local paper,
momentum is growing on the skate park idea. He has received three very positive phone
calls. Two are parents of children who are active in sports, offering their help in working
on it. One is a professional designer of rinks who has done skate parks and would charge
a fee. He is a consultant, designer, and builder- contractor. Themig also recommended a
man from Shoreview who has had experience for Puzak to talk to.
Engineer Brown reported that there has been extensive damage to Silverwood Park.
Vandalism has occurred on an every other night rampage. The estimated value is about
$3,000. Charlie Davis got things back to normal in 2 days. South Lake Public Safety has
had some success in tracking the offenders.
13. ADJOURNMENT
Dallman moved and Puzak seconded to adjourn the meeting. Motion passed 4/0.
The meeting adjourned at 10:47 p.m.
Respectfully Submitted,
Connie Bastyr
Recording Secretary
Options for Financing Park Improvements
2 User Fees — Sports Organizations— Tournament Fees
•
Pros
• Established users are in place
• Steady income potential
• Philosophy of "user pays"
Cons
• May not pay — voluntary
• Could reduce sports organizations'
voluntary improvements
• Doesn't take into account their other
donated efforts
• Hard to be fair
• Higher expectations?
• Improvements may not benefit the
Points
• Project specific and park specific
• Needs to be designated by Council for the Park Fund
• Charge for tournaments
Pros
• Sustainable source of revenue
• Amenity to park
• Makes the park a destination
Cons
• Need to manage it
• Sustainable source, but not steady or
consistent (business risk)
Points
• What is the profit margin?
is
•
4. Parking Fees at Freeman Park
Pros
Cons
• Raises substantial amount of
• Costs money to manage
money
• Unkind and unfriendly
• Possible towing fee percentage
• Has potential for backlash from the
• Has potential to be the most fair
community
• Could help solve parking problems
• Neighborhood impact
• Enforcement is a problem
Points
• Consider raising tournament fee instead
• Charge during peak times (limit fees to certain hours)
5. Tower (PCS) Revenue
Pros Cons
• Revenue from any tower on park • Neighborhood concerns
property should go to park fund • Aesthetics
• Very viable and lucrative
• Points
• Consider tower for wayside rest area at Old Market Road and Highway 7
• Need to ask for necessary ordinance chanizes
6. Transfer Fees
Pros
• Sustainable and lucrative
Points
(None)
Pros
• Already in place
Points
(None)
Cons
• Requires legislative approval
• Needs administration
Cons
• Diminishing
•
Pros
• Funds are available
• No objection from tax payer
Cons
• Grant - writing / Administration cost
• Project specific
• Could be strings attached
• Unpredictable
Points
(None)
9 Private Donations (Inc g land)
Pros
Cons
• Non -tax payer money
• Might be project specific or have
• Provides tax deduction for donator
strings attached
• Need solicitor, leader or group
• Could end up with "white elephant'
Points
(None)
10. Corporate Sponsorship and Advertising
Pros
Cons
• Potential exists
• Could be strings attached
• Not tax money
• . Possible public opposition
• Potentially unsightly
• Needs leadership
Points
(None)
11. General City Funds
Pros
• Justifiable expenditure of tax
dollars for a valued amenity
Cons
• Up to City Council discretion
Points
(None)
C�
Pros
• Positive contributions for liquor
operations
Points
(None)
Pros
• Can specify conditions
• Source is specific to user
Cons
• No profit at present time
• Public perception ( "sin tax ")
Cons
• May have negative public
perception
• Reouires ordinance Chang
Points
(None)
•
14. Lawful Gaming
Pros Cons
• Potential for substantial income • May have negative public
• Partnership building perception (sin tax)
• New found source • Limited to one site (Legion)
Points
• Legion already contributes to community
• Could approach Southshore Center
•
[15. Vending Machines-
Pros
Cons
• Could be built into concession
• Vandalism potential
building for security
• May impact city staff
• Open beyond concession stand
hours
• Potential is there. Only work is to
draw a contract
• Potentially low administrative cost
• Could be at multiple locations
Points
• Vending machine company deals with complaints and maintenance
0
16. Park Event: and. Shelter Rentals
Pros
Cons
• Good public relations for parks
• Need leader and champion
• Facilities are in demand
• Staff time required
• Needs coordination
• Heav use of parks
Points
• Freeman Park could be a great location for a corporate event
Pros
• Amenity and service to
community
Cons
• Need part time director
Points
None
•
•