The URL can be used to link to this page

1957 pl mn . .,.~ SHOREWCOD VILlAGE PLANNING COl<t"tISSION t.flnut.e 8 of the Meet.ing March 12, 1957 the Shorewood Village Planning Oommission met at 8;00 P.M. in the Men's Lounge of the Mlnnewashta school with t.he following members present; H. G. Aldritt, D. N. Borgen, Mrs. R. J. Good~n, R. D. Handy, J. B. Janyrin, Geo. L.s.t.terner, P. A. Skjenold. the lHeting was oalled to order by our teaporarychairma.n, Donald N. Borgen, who opened the meeting by stating three itelDs of business to be oonsidered. 1. Select tlme and place for meetings 2. Slect permanent. officers }. Discuss zoning of Lots 10, 11, 12, l}, 14, 15 and part of Lot "'+ of' t.he Oak Hill Addition being considered for a Phillips 66 service station and a restaurant. Joseph B. Janvrin was elect.ed chairman and Mrs. Roger Goodman secret.ary. It wa.s decided that all recotYllnendations of the Shorewoodvi11age Planning 001lllll1ss10n be presented to the Shorewood Village Council showing a yote count with the comments of the affirmative and negat.ive stdes accompanying. Mr. Latterner said he had been asked to submit an absentee vote against commercial zoning of the proposed Phillips sight for Mr. Haralson. t4r. Aldritt opened the discussion regarding re-zoning of the property described above by outlining the lot lines on an aerial phot.o. He also sketched the proposed changes for us. tir. Aldritt said he felt this property was valueless unless zoned colllltlercial. Mr. Handy agreed and moved that the planning commission recommend to the village council that this property be zoned commercial. I-fra. Goodman seconded.. A discussion and question period followed. Mr. tatterner said he worked at the same place aa Mr. Stark, whose property immediately adjoins the proposed commercial sight, and that i"r. Stark is not in favor of the re- zoning. Mr. Stark's property is in Excelsior village. 'The other pro?erty surrounding the area includes Dr. Ostergren's dental office and residence, Dr. 3eifert's clinio and a servic€'lstation whlch is across Water st. All in Exoelsior village. ltrs. Goodman said that the corner 18 a natural extension of the Excelsior business distriot and that the Minnesota State Highway Department, rather than Shorewood village, deoreed the change trom desirable residential to commercial type property when the new Highway 7 was routed. Mr. Aldritt said that he felt Mr. Stark could profit more trom commercial zoning of his property t.han as residential and inasmuch as the Excelsior business distriot has been steadily moving south along Water St. towards Highway 7 it is only a matter of time until his property 18 also zoned commercial. Mr. Skjervold raised the following questions. W~ couldn't a house ba built on the Shorewood property in question~ other homes have been buH 1. on Highway 7. Is t.here any real need for any cOll\lIerclal properly in Shorewoodt Mr. Latterner felt that some commeroialization would be desirable for .JO ~ ...-. 4 . - 2 - March 12th Minutes ,continued emploYDlent of: those who wished t.o l1ve and work in the area. in the ruture. Mr. Handy mentioned the need tor tax relief" on residents. l.fr. Janyrin said that in spite of village boundaries, as a community we are a unit which hae Exce18ior for its business distriot and t.hat's the logical plac. tor comTllercial property. Mr. Skjervcld asked what. 18 to prevent the 1IIUshrooDling ot other san commerotal areas now exist.ing in predo~nantly residential places. Mrs. Goodman mentioned the upcoming population growth as a oompelling force to determine a planned oommercial area in our village. Kr. Skjervold said that the population. growth was t.he c01'llpe1l1n.g reasOll tor his ohjection to any oom:nercialization. exoept in isolated eases, thus protecting present and future residents tram changes in the status of t.heir property. Mr. Borgen said that he felt th18 instance was an isolated case which demanded commercial zoning. Set.h Mr. Borgen and Mr. Skjervold said that the increase in village inceme from the taxes would be so minute that it wouldn't be not10eaole. Mr. Borgen mentioned t.hat no amount of commercial- izat.ion in our village could noticeably reduce residential taxes with the exc.eption of an industry comparable to t'ifinn$apo1ie Moline in HO!lkins. Mr. Janvrin rEularked that we build a 4 lane highway to accomrlodate a lot of traffic moving fast. Then each side of the highway becc1'les eommerclaHzec and speed limits are reduced to allow for ears entering and turning oft. Soon the highway i8 not serving its purpose and more land must be acquired through condemna.tion proceedings to construct. a treeway. So we proeeec in an increasingly expend ve spiral. Mr. Janvrin asked for a.ny further comments and t.hen called for a vote on Mr. Handy's motion. The motion was carried five to two. Mr. Skjenold moved that the Shorewood Village Planning Commission meet the first. Monday night of each month at Minnewashta school. Mr. Borgen seconded and the mot.ion was passed unanimously. Mr. Janvrin advised us all to attend the pub 1 1c hearing March 19 at rUnnewashta seheel on the Phil lips question and to meet at the school at 8:00 P.M. April 1 unless he advised us otherwise. Mr. Borgen moved that we.rite down our ideas regarding the Shorewood zoning of property along Highway 7 eo that a general statement could be co.Dlposed by asub-collllllittee to be pres.ented. to the village council within two months. Mr. Skjervold seconded and the motion passed unanimously. Mrs. Goodman mentioned that the question of parks and playgrounds should be discussed at our next meeting. Mr. Skjervoldmoved that we adjourn and Mr. Janvrin adjourned the meeting. Respectfully submitted, Marion fr. . ';"- ;:~,~ ~ .. -" - ~ -~- . SliOREWOOD VI1.LAGE PLANNING COMMISSION Maroh 14, 1957 Mayor W. Dudley Kendriok Excelsior Minn. Re, ZOning of Lote 10 - 15 en,,- Part of Lot 4.. OflkHUl Addlt.10n Dear Hr. Kendricka The Shorewood Village Plann!", Commission met. on Maroh 12 and dlsoussed the request that t.he~bove defJorlbed property be . zoned. .oolJ1l'llerclal. Of the .eyen _tltbers present, five .,oted for co..rcial zoning and .two agd,n.at.. The reasons gi.,en in support of o0llll1l6rc1aU.~..tlon werea 1. The property 188, natural oontinuation of the Excelsior business d 1st riot. 2. Shorewood reddents would benefit fro. the commeroial. taxe8. ,. The one remaining re81denoeadjoin1ng t.he propertyvould realize acre profit tro. ooallero1al zoning t.han by relJUl1ning residential ...,nd inaSlJlUchas the Exoelsior bU8ineu dietrict has been moving.teadlly in that direction it is only a flatter of t1me until hie property too will be zoned co~rclal. 4. The forlhcomlng growth in Shore,.,ood' 8 population cOUlpelaus todetermi.ne noW' where cOllmlerclalareas will be. ,. 'l'hepropetty in qUestion 18 greatly increaled in value bycolllm$rclal zoning for theownerl. ,.,hereae the new Highway 7 depreciates 'the property as a re8idence. 6. Shorewood should have some commercialization for resident8who wianto lbe and work in the area . The reasons given against oommercial zoning. we.re a 1. There. 18 .no need for commeroial prope.rty in Shorewood beoau.e.l11age inoome fro. t.axes 'W"Ould besorainute in the total picture t.hat the residents would benefit no reduction in their taxes\mJ.e.8 arilndustry oOlOOpsl'able to l.f1.nneapolb Molineln Hcpklnswel'e8tarted. 2. A home could uebullt 01'1 the property. ,. It Highway 1 beC0II88 commercialized.. trat'fio problem will result, .._....Crl1i!.~..c,... .~. . -{ , < . .........'.{'".k..... .. It,t -~ ,or ~~"~~ . - 2 - speed 11a1ts will be teducedand eve.ntually it would be nece....I'1.to reconstruct t.heMghvay at considerable co..t. In order to accolllllOd..t. cross tratf'lco 4. The tortbcolllin,growth in Shorewood'.. poptdatlon co.pels u. to ban co.,u'ciallation eO that t't!t81dent,e will be in.ured that Shorevood -1.11 "ain a relidential diatr1cto '0 In spite ot village boundaries, we are a unit as a couunityand hay. a cOllllDOrclal 41.triet in hcelsior village. Rea.pecttully.youn. Joseph I. Janvrln. Ohalr11an Shore'lfQoel Vlllqe Planning Oo_i.sion DIg cot iI. Wiltsey, Village Clerk . . \~ Christmas Lake, Shorewood Route 5, Excelsior, Minnesota March 21, 1957 Members of the Village of Shorewood Planning Commission: Please note that our next regular meeting will be held at 8:00 P.M" Tuesd~, April 2nd at the Minnewashta School. It was not possible to arrange for access to the school building on Monday evening. The Village Council has requested that we review the enclosed letter and attachments relative to the proposed Hennepin County park system. There are two questions which are briefly summarized below: (1) Should the Shorewood Council adopt resolution A which indicates support for proposed action by the State Legislature reducing the regulatory power of county park boards over lakes? (2) Should the Shorewood Council adopt resolution B urging the Hennepin County Board to take action to create a. county park district? In order to expedite c0nsideration of these matters, please study the enclosures and come to the meeting prepared to discuss them and formulate our views on the proposals. Mr. Lloyd Graham, Ivihg in the second house on the east side of old highway 41 south of highway 7, has requested the Village Council to grant him a special use permit to conduct a repair shop for power lawnmowers and similar equipment on his residential premises, or, alternatively, to re-zone his property as Commercial. Will you familiarize yourself with the exact location of Mr. Graham's property and the surrounding properties and come to the April 2nd meeting prepared to dis- cuss this matter and reach a conclusion. Members of the Village Council will attend our April 2nd meeting for the pur- pose of discussing our recent recommendation regarding the property at the northeast corner of highway 7 and old highway 41. While the above items represent quite an agenda, I hope you will each bring to the meeting at least a rough outline of your proposed plan for the orderly develop- ment of the properties adjoining highway 7. We should keep in mind that the Council expects us to recommend a plan of development for the entire Village as soon as we can reasonably do so. />!/y,,~\., ,..--t\'''~~-~-__. ! Ben Janvrin, Chairman . . " April 8, 1957,' This is the correct. lege.ldeacr1ption of the proposed Phillips 66 eight (Mr. Schwart.z's property) ment.ioned in cur minutes of the March 12t.h meeting and our March 14th recommendation to the village council. SE.OTION}4. Lots 17" 289, 291, ~05 and va.c:ated road adjoining same. Auditor's subdiYision #155, Iiennepin Oounty, Minnesota. Also Lots 14 & 15 and south half of Lot l~, Linden Park. Lots 4, 5, 10, 11, 12, 1~, 14, 15, Galpin illll Addition to llenn. Co., Minn., toget.her with yacated part of Water st. lying immediutely west of and adjoining said lot.s in Galpin Addition. . " V l l t~ ~ :: . StioiUi:WOUDfULA.GE. PLAlilUNG .QOMMISSION Minutes ot the Meet.in& April 2, 1957 The aeet.ing ",a. called t.o order by otu"chail1la.n,Mr. Janvrin. the following ..oers were preaentl H. G. Ald.rit.t, .D. B. Borgen, A. G. 'iot, ~r.. R. J. Goodall" R. .0. Handy, E. Q. Haralson,J. S. ,Jan'll",1nani Geo. Latt.ertler. )linute. of' t.beMaroQ. 12th...t.il1i we re,relild e.r.t<< appro'led. OlIr let.ter or' reeo".at.ion t.o t.he Snore.ood 'l11ace COl.VleU ~gardln&eo~rolal soniag of the eo1"ft8r property .~ Hi&Qw" 7aa4 Water st.. vas lllao reviewed. Mrs. GoodQ.ft reported tb.at ~h. .1110.g. attorney, Mr. lelly, recQ...naed ve ..t.abl1shruleie regard.ing ..b..at" yotes and a. quorua. Regarding a quorwa, d1acl.laslonconcluded ~b.at. '/1 qu.orwa shol.lld.bellOre than hal f the total lJI$18bers.hl p or ten in order to give the v 111.ge council a veU-rounded recoamenda:t.ion. t;{r. Latt.eme,r felt it 8b.Ould be an 04d ftu.:nber to avoid-t1,.etfyotes on al'1,1 l"ecolllMndat:$.on. Mr.. fiorgea Z10nd that we eat.bIbh a quor.Ulll1 of ae'Ventor votllilg PU1"}>o,,' tnilt pel"llit lleetinga of fewer _Jabere for dbeu..ion only.iofr. lianalseconied and the lllOtion carried W'la.nll1lO\lsly. On absentee yote., Mr. HarahonIlen1.1oned t.hat.. a reel1lber ~&htche.nge nla opinion on .. given 1e.ue tolloving the planning oolRi.s1.01l'. dl..... cuaaion. AI". .i"lck l3IO.ed.that absentee '1ote. be tIlent.loned in our JlI1n\lt.e. but. be e~oluded. from the letter of reco....endatiol'l eub.lt.t.d t.o the Y111age counoil.. Mr. Borgen aeconded and the motion oarriedanan1.taously. . Mr. Janyrin ..sked for discae.10n and amoti.on On the epecla1perait requea~.d by Lloyd Graham t.oerect. a t.hre. car cement block garage, _ he can repair lawn -.ower... Mr. .80rgel'l report.~d t.hat he _Ii. \...Ikod.. to Mr. Graha. ..nd foUnd that tho&&ragewoul d bcbcbind h1$ pre.sentpra,e at. the back ot hla4riv8lfay. lie woaldl.llJe U. to :l"epalr la.wn l'llo..r. a.nd he &.leo intend. tohaye ..'foro dealerahlp.Mr.Haralson ..ked ita speclalperm1t. could be revoked should. its ue be ab\lsedandMr. A.ldrlt.~ aaid it could. Mr. Hand.YlJlOyed that WEt recolflnend 'to the d.llagecounoll the:\. a spEtcial permit be is$ued Lloyd Graham tor the constrUcttonot a three car garage to b. used tor lawn BlOw.r and other .-.11 repair jobs. Mr. Aldritt aecondedand tneact.ion paned unanilllOusly. we \.hen joined the 'l'111age council in their special meet.ing to 1"8V1elf our reco.-endatlon On cormaerci.dzoningot. theprcpo8ed PhiU1ps66 sight at 1Ughwa". 7 and t1aterSt.. The COi.U\cil vowd ~ t.o<a for eO.....J'Cial Zoning but. 'tone aeasure tailedt.o fleet. t.he 4/5 requi1"eMnt. Mr. Jan'l'l'1n asked .Mr. Kendrick. U' the cou.ncll was 1n any rush tor a recolUendation reg.rdillgparka and pla,ygroA.tnda and !l(r. Kendr,1ck. Indlc..,ted it. could. wait unt.il our next. meeting. t41". Jan'frinadjoarned th~ ...t1n&. Rea~cttullT 8ubalt.ted, . .. .rion K. Good..n, Secreta,., . ,./ COpy SaORE\100D VULAGE PlA.lfrtING CCJoOO:SSI0N .pril 5,1957 Mayor 'f. Dwlh7 Kendrick Excel aior Hinn. 1W: Special Pertt1t. for Garage on J.,lcyd arahal'll.i>ro~ert, Dear Mr. Kendrick: The Shorevood V111a.ge Planning OOl'llds81on _tonh.prU 2 and dlscuSS04 Lloyd Graham' 8 request for 8.8pec1alpel"=it. to erect a thre.e car cement block ge.ragefcr thept.trpoaeot: conduoting. _.11 repail" work. There vere eight _lIlbers pre8ent; the vote was unanlrftOus for 'the bswmce. of a special permit.. Mr. Graham plans to CC;lDSt.NCt. the new 4arageat .the b..ckot hi.elrS..."ay behind his present garage and will handle small repair Jobs ineludlr&&. lawn aower repairs in conjunction with hi8 Toro d.ale.rs~lp.. '~ 1.1 In vlew of the fact thats. 8peclalpe rml tCM be. .1"eyokedshould" be abu8ed, the plMning co_bsl.on favored Mr. Gra.hul' a request. Resp.ectfulll ,.ours, J. 8.. Janyril'l, Oba.iJ't.llar1 Shorewcod Village Pl8.li1ning Oo_lssion tag OCl E. Wiltsey, Ville.geOlerk H. Schllldt R. l'ayfield D. Arehart. ...__ro... . .------ OFF/( TRS Watl,r S Hall;s. If. Pn:\I\knt Edv,.in p. Chapman Vice Pi'''::S~.jtllt Desmond F. Pn1it V ic\.' Pl (~~id,-'nt Olto A Sdha \"lce Pre'Sid\.;'c! ('hark" 'I Sih-ersnn Vice fir-~Sldcnt fia"~ \\ Waile" 'lift.'" Pre,:;jJ~~nt \-trs.lnrn E. CritTHl'l!n~ .SeC!I'!..1fV - Wallf' ( Briggs Tre::,!'wrer DIIU. TOfi.S Pa~l '\Ihrecht Men:nandi':Jng Jim Bormann R,ldio \\'alter C. Brigg~; Banl,;ng Ed.... ,n P. Chal'm"n '\ltl..lrneV \V;ll~;jm Ii ('h?r'\m"n 'Bar;king' ""I" ( horles W. Cole PrInting \1 r", .lohn E. Crim.lnins John F. Finn. I r. \1 rs~. Gale Sander Genis . . .\...il100 ()ffiC;,.tl '~.lal1. \\'. (Jj}~" In-;lH (iI1C,~ \\'ditCf S. Harns, .lr. ....-1 ;-~ 11 U f~i<;:tu r i n g \Vd!iam 'W'. l.ockhart I.<lW School Dean Lee Loevinger '\oorilcv Gordon :1.. Mikkehon Pd-dH: Relations R~ihhj Alhert G Mmda \\;1I1S10o. L \\1oJandeI R~l!1king f c"dlt.' C 'Park Dowr. Town Real Fstate Dc-.,mond F. PrJ.U .\ ttnrney \ <;<ih" 'it";"Sp<:l per \. f',;/ f ~:h~:'vo:'jn \\: (lief: o,^,'a!1aCc ..\ rc h!l eel Fr;.Jn~ \V \lJalter\ \lerch..mdlSing fohn \,\' WindhoT"t \ifornev R()hert I. 'Wi'i/"tart l' ']nn Off IC"\ I P/\'iT PRESIDENTS I ,,,,,qrd F. Ramberg Snl~\f'~ '^,' leek Le-,;jie C Park Chade" S. Bello\>'::; Chade-s T. SiiVerS(iH ST AFT . Ravrnond O. llbck Executive Director Albert j Richter Reseo3n:h Dire\.~tor Elmer L Ja('ob~j:_n ~'le'll"iher\h!p Dirt~CiOI I: ...,... CITIZENS LEAGUE Minneapolis and Hennepm County eOl 5YNr.11CATE BUILOING ~ ~ItOE'''~,L 8-019i -,,1N,NIlAPOLIS 2 M1NI'il:SOT,e., February 15, 1957 Mayor W* D. Kendricks Route 5, Shorewood Ex ce ls i or, Mi nneso ta Dear il>ayor A.an.-:ld oks 1 As you know there bas been discussion over the ~st two year. of activating a Hennepin County park system under a law J>>.ssed by the 1955 legislature. There 'i.s general recognition of the need for setting land aside for eventual development as parks but there r~ve been some questions as to whether this is the time and the war to go ahead. The Lake Minnetonka communities were disturbed about the power which the county park board would have under th.e 1955 law to regulate the use of lakes which were not locally regulated. They have organized the League Qf M.innetonka Munic:i~liti6s to provide local :regulation of the lake and the League is doing a good job. To eliminate this questi.on as to the county parkboard1 s power to regulate lake use, a bill is being sponeored in t,he present legislature by Senator Archie t:iller and Representatives AIf Bergerud and Leonard Lindquist which cuts the park boarcis regulatory power over lakes down to lakes lying wholly wi thin a county ps.rk or to the lakeshore and waterfront out for not more than 300 feet of park property. This amendment has the approval of the League of' Hennepin Towns &nd Municipalities, the League of :rinnetonka Huniclpalities, the Giti:uJns League and the following village and city councils and town boards. Oaseo New- Hope Brooklyn Park Brookl.;;"11 Center ExcE'Jlsior PIJ'1'llouth Woodland Hopkins Robbins<:'..ale Orono .~ S tJ. Louis Park Hassan Golden V811ey Edina Deephaven \rJayza ta Morningside Eden Prairie If your counc:U or town bODX'd is interested in getting this amendment adopted vr..ll you consider the attached resolution A at an early meeting and if action is taken wi.1l you please ask your clerk to advise me and your legislators. On the question of activating a Hennep1.n County Park System, the League of Hennepin Towns and Municipalities studied the question and concluded that on the a5f3umption that tbe la}(e regulatory problem w"ill be straight,ened at t.his legislative session, a Hennepin CountYplrk system be activated promptly. Copies of the ,<~ NON p);,RnS,1H'~ c. ~IH"~S C~"r~(,;f:d-..n '"ATJON ,^,';:,"<RK q..,!G fOR BETTER ( C,OYfRI"....IENT ..~.. page i .. caromi ttee! s report and of:::.he aCGion by the Hennepin Lea,gue are attached following resoh:tion B. To get the county park system going 1% of the voters or a majority of the city and village councils must petition the county board. It then appoints the 1irst park b08rti, all in this case from rural and suburban Hennepin and after that the park DOOTd members are elected. The following councils and tOI~ boards have f~ssed resolution B urging the county booro to take action: Ossac New Hope Brooklyn Park Brooklyn Center Excelsior Richfield, Hopkins HObbinsdale St. Louis Park Golden Valley gdina Eden Pmirie Deeptlll ven Wayza ta Morningside Plymouth Hassan If ~our council (ir board is interested in getting the county park district started, win you consider resolution B at an early meeting and if action is taken will yeu please ask your clerk to advise me and the Hennepin County BoardQ . A summary of the 1955 law is also attached "1' your information and if you:r men 'Would like to r.ave someone come and explain this in more detail please calI !T18 and I wj,ll be glad to arrange it. Charles Cole of :;ayzata is the cirman of our committee on this subject and we have representatives from most of the communities in the county on the committee. Perhaps some of them have already talked to you about this. Yours very truly, ,-"",' {"Ii' Ra.}f'lond D. Black Exe'cuti ve -Director . -"" ~.; .. . i~ /I \ L ~. l 1 1,~ J V . 1 " I i/ , / l,; i ! 0/ . Reeolved that the o01.mo1! en Board ot 'Trustees ot the of village, oity or unn1 name eupporta in principle the changes in Chapter 806 lAws of 2liiinnesota 1955, set fbrth in the proposed bill attaohed. / / R..olution .' -- :R~~s0:1,u,t'io-~~_ 1-':() 1'h(;; Frc::;(c,c:ra.,:::,jJ,rs H:,')"~r<:j 0." A :ti t~i, 't e; JnHTi ~ &~ ,f+; 1 OiJ;y~ !' 8 :i: (:i'Xa t,.r. e G""ntJ ,t~)!~'i.l ~ P:teas-::-f oe e,: ,'$ ;:;\'t \; ,h.~_ t r:. ~,~ t-r'_\~j' ) f lla.l't;_e f ,fj. t ;~ ,t\,~ 1 t t':Hi 8, ,n,( ',',ee""!::1 .!}~; t...dt;:; "t:;he f c ~L resou.~tj. !;),r~ OXl t:;,rt,{'\ i,ret~t~~d4 i'':CH tr!.,:nSL'1is '~.O!l f)~lV)U. ". I{H gO l"Jf~d, t:hJ3\'t; t~r1e t~he of '~"""""':"""""""-'."""----,-"~,,~,,,,,-,..,-'''' --_,"a"_~"'~_'"'""'''''___~''\''':''C'''''''''''i___-'''__''-____~'' j{,!:JJ18 tf ~i:1, r.L~}('4 s ~J-t !l l' he t1.0\}S h.e BorJ,.r(l ()f (~' (JrnnIj~B l~i t~: !;t:;r Hf' ()!' toil P:i,2,'i' s ~lt,n t 1; 0 C ht) .t-:i}~~rsf' u:;t:nr:~eso'r-~:~ r1f~::j tt) actt'vate n park: d:lat.t':lClt '::on$ist'.~n;r 0; .)1" t}lit} (if e:'tc e pt tb.f3.t \~:ii;h,"1.,r"t}tt3' )'G u.r:ct,~;l,t' ,_,;;).;,~, of' t.3.'l~ C ():i' .. D",;'l'E ~ -'-__'_t:',~_""",'_'_______-"_~_,,,_, '''''-<.Jl'-''''.-_''''_____''''_''''''~_.,___''....AO_..'''_,~,'''_'''__:'''';- '""',".....___'_,,'._"';o---.'_~,__,_''"'"'__~ Gler1:;:: :'tt 8$+ . ON"! . A BILL .. ---- -- FCR AN ACT REl)tx:INQ THE REXHJIJ.TCRY PCWERS CI' COUNTY AND MULTI..cOUNTY PARK BOARDS OVER LAKES; AMENDING CHAPTER 806, LAWS CF MINNESOl'A 1955. BE IT ENAC TED BY THE LEGISLA'l'URE CF THE STATE (]i' HrNtm>aI'A s See tior-I, See ti on 9a.. Chapter 806.. rAWS of Minnesota 1955, is hereby amended as follows: . 9 (a) The power to regulate by ordinance (1) the use of the waters of any lake lying wholll wi thin w.. P8.iPk-~S;t,PH;t, a g:rk established under this act and acts amenaa tory thereof by all persons, including persons boating, swimming, fistung, skating or otherwise in, upon or about said lake; and W~~-&~-~k&-~.-R~~~eadf s~~~e~-~Q-~QPa~-PQg~~~gA9_~~-a_.~Q~pal Qep~Q~~~eat-~-~~~;t,Q~-QQQY_Qt-;t,~e_StatQ-O: lG.RBeset.;}.... (2) Revised as 8 uggested by Lake Minnetonka representatives on 12-18-56 . ~ ~ .. ., ~ llA?ORT CI ~ 01 COM! .ean D~CT ~ :tJtl()UE 1"R H.8nmPDf ~S AiitD KUlIC~ 4. aecOIrJIIeMations of COJWitte" _ 1. A Hennepin Cotmt;r P"oirk liiatr1crl:. shiJuld be ~diate1.J &Ctlvat.ed under the 195:5' law af'f'in:i8.thre 1"sBolutiG'1"1!i r4 the -.,w1ty of governirig bod:les or the ;'I1Unici~J_it.;ies ~n Hi!!1r€\epL'l COUDty. A fJUgges'ted :res(jluid.on (1) &t'k;reued to He,nMp:Ln. CCJ%mt.1 BOai'd U attached. 2. Moditica"tion or 'l~ he 1955 law ehould be.~Q.llht in the 1957 session of tec1al~1t\ln to l1.Jlit regulat,01'1 pO'<<1\81:' the ;;wop:oe.ed county park boardO'V'~l' lakeilJ 1d. i;hin he OOIWlty' 101..1,7 \018(18 lJ'i.."C vbolJ..)" witJt- in p&r'ke and to any Lakt; shorel1.'le within a p.i.rk, ,Suggested f'(~801utiol1 (B) and suggested bill (C) to aceomplish these chaDlea are attacl'H3d. B. Reasons for Committee action: 1. Hennepin County neediS to acquirf: large tracts of land now which are suitable tor eventual development as natural parks. 'this JllUat be done before areas now available are improved and developed for other purposes. I 2. Towns and nnn1cipalities of the county may provide 8OJr16 local parka for intensive recreation purposes, but other financial pressures 'Will prevent them fronl pl"'Ovid1ng for larger natural parks while JUch lands are 8tHl available, and it would not be fair to expect one or two communities to provide such large parkg wh4iln people 1'rol1 allover will use them. 3.. No present boqy exists which can receive and hold gifts of land tor general county park purposes. The Committee bollov8s that other cifts such as the Lake IndepondenCXJ property now held temporarily in trust by the MinneapoliSl Park Board vill be racei'f'ed when a county pnric board exists. 4.. your committee o!1ginally oEP~~~~ activation because ML~aapolis is not part of the park district, and supplios no tax support to it. ~ new favor the present bill because rural .~l!g suburban Hennepin vill elect and control the count)'" park Board. 5. The neod for a county park system is recognbod so generally in the county that l'JO/ft(; other body will provide it if we refuse and it may be one over which we will have less control. 6. The tax resources of .18; per capita about $28,000.00 per year until 1960 when the amount should increase to 145,oJO.00 or more. Pro sent inc orne will provide for staff and necessary initial planning as well as 30ma funds for lnnd acquisition when plans are completed. Informal discussions with the M~~eapoli3 ~rk Bo~rd ~d etaff lead us to belieTe th~t the County Purk Bourd Cml contract to receive prtifessional services from the ::staff O.t' tre M1nn€Hlpolis Boord at a n1Uch lower cost th~ it could. provide such services for itS61f if it decides that this is a good w:J\f to proceed. t " ~ 7" Minnetonkn Co.aunities no longer oppoa8 tbe county park bill becauso theT have proTided for local regulnt::i.on of M"'mootonk;t by jo1n-f:, action. The present park bill itHl1' prov1.dcla that it tl.lU~ no jurisdiction lIbsre prior roplat1cn _lata. .pprovn}.~. t~.i. roe~ndat1'!1hL_.~~oritJ:__ of the g~mlIw ood16s of the Hftll1Mp1.n County ~guta of Towns am Municipalities should &SSUN its palJ~G in the next 808sion. t L $l:l ~ D. Tho Exocutive Coardt~e of too Cit1Hns Lo.ague of Minneapolis and Hennepin County h.u ~ed to WON for this, too" I. A BUIIIRr:y ot the 1955 taw h .ttaehed (!ee i:tt'~len lheet) and Copif#1 ot the full teet ~ be ,oot,itined 01 tl& linrJll 1!6" R.. c. Pemflt~j c~tt~)~ Ch~. . fI 'REPORT (2' CCIImTEEOI cotm'y an D~ f01. IJWnJE ,-, HBiBPDl rcuts at) MOIIC~ .4.. aecOlrllltieMationsof OOftl8itte~ _ 1. A Hennepin Co~\nt7 P'llirk Ljistrict should. be ~dia'w.17 act.1vat.ed under the 195;~ law a:;;'t'i~lIlti'ljre !'8301uticl1a t}! 'the -.1ority of govemir~ bodlf)s of the munici~~,11tifH! H~rt'lepL"l Oount,.. A fnlggeflted :resolutio~. (A) adC;reued to H~.mwpi.a COlmty BOard it attached. 2. Modification of '>>~he 1955 law ftlould be~ought in the 1957 M'sion 01 Let1al>1tun to liai:r:regtlla't:orr pOliftlt' the l;1rGpo.ed county pAl'k Ooudoover lue8 lCU;.hin t be t.:ICIWlty' .ol.~L7 to lake. 'ly1.rc vholl.y with- in par'ks and to an;y lalro ahorel1."le within a park~ Sugcested :N.~sol'Utioll (5) and suggested b:Ul (C) to accompluh these cbaDgea are attaclled. B. Reasons for Committee action: 1. Hennepin County needd to acquir!.': large tX"actB of land n"JW which are suitable for eventual development as na tural parks. 'fhis mat be dOM before areas now available are improved and developed tor other purposes. f 2. Towns and l!lmicipalitiee of the county may provide some local parka for intensive recreation purposes, but other financial pressures will p:rovont theM from providing for larger natural parks while IUch lands are still available, and it would not be fair to oxpect one or two communities to provide such large parks whoo people frail. all over will use them. .3.. No present body exists which can receive and hold girts of la.nd tor general county park purposes. The Committee bolieves that other cUts such as the take Independence prop<lrty now held temporarily in trust by the Minneapolia Park Board w111 be rece11'ed when a county pnric board exists. 4.. Your committee orig1nal~ oppo~e1 activation because Minneapolis is not part of t~ park district, and supplies no tax support to it. we new favor the present bill because rur~l an"d suburban Hennepin vill elect and control the county Park Board. 5. Tho neod !:or a county park system is recognizod so generally in the county that SOIft(; other body will provide it if we refuse and it may be one over which we will have less control. 6. The tax resources o!: .18; per capita about $28,000.00 per year until 1960 when the amount should increase to t45,ooo.00 or more. Pro sent income will provide for staft und necessary initial planning as well 8.8 some funds for Innd acquisition when plans are completed. Infornal discussions with the M~~eapolis ~rk Bonrd ~d eta!:! lead us to belieT. thilt the County Prlrk Board em contract to receive pr€lfessional services from the staff of the M1nnanpoli:5 Boord nt i. l'IIUch lower cost than it could provide such servicea for itself if it decid.es that this is Do good w~ to proceed. 'I , ~ ~ { 7.. K1nnetonkn C~ities no longer oppose the county parte bill becauso ther have proTided for local regull1tion r:4 M"'mootonk~ by join+, action. The prosent park bUI itMlt provldea that it M# no jurisdiction vbere prior roplation _iata. APproTal?t t~1. ree~nd!1t1(.ln~_~~oritJ: of the g01lllltm~ bodies of 'the Hftll1Mp1n County toogue or Towns and Municipalities should ~8BUre it3 pas8Ai8 in the next &assian. D. The EXocutive COIIl'dttefl of tho Citizen. LGague of Minnenpolia and Hennepin County Ma ~tred tl\) work for 'this, too" E. A 8UDlRry ot t:M 19,5 t.Inf ill ~tt~chttd (~e liNMn SlMet) ind copio$ ot the full ~t ~ be oott\lned by ~&.l~ I.!a" }t.. C. 1emnma, C~tt:;;l~ Cha~n. . . . . . J'I.:A !.:i't.J IN::; ; Nt_:~<CIN(y : -",. -2 - \H Thf) power of' e:i1inent domahl except ,d.th'in munloi l.t:;(;a wh~?re Gonse:nt of tbe local must be obtaJ.!',ed a,nd in oth.::l' (;our:ties v~here the eC'l:D,;'Hrnt; elf tho oounty "bcard!3 must be obta:tned.. (b The PUWi:';), to pas i'i ordin3.nces ~ ~ ';-l.f~ rev'_:,' IQte liak,f.: vrit;.h :t,U di. st,ri.ct :r~o'c Cjt,'~ <:\p\t-i.~~~ ref; ~,tt~.ct. (d) (the powee to borrow mO!1(,ywithout Q referend1.:l.m up tCl 1/10 of 1~/~ of the 1 and true "",lu€' of the di.Btri::,t a!ld 'fi'it,ll a refere:ndl2nlup to 5/10 of 1:%. (e) The fot' a.g;:reoment a.s WE. pOW'J!, to 'U.\ke over and opertite ps;:,rk f'e.cilities .:itJO em request a.nd pursuant to such be "forked out with the munioipality.. (f) The p~wBr to poli<H!t officers to pol:i.ce the and tc enforce thfJ ordina.nces park:6 YT:~ th:Lll, tn.e d is tr-:\,(,:t passed by the board. (t~) pOYrf~r to hire e. superinten.dent, who must be e. ad':linlsb'ation, and other U!\rl of cxpcr'ien('\e .u., neees sery empl ~ '{'he is to clevelo)) and keep up 1:0 date, 1'\ plan fOr the development of p~a-k: 13 vr:.thin the district. The board preFH3res i'tr;! aJlll\l!".l operating bud~~€rt: 'wh,ich ca:n....ot eXQ8EH1 J.st per person in the dis{;rict (th~,s limit can be raised to not 10 exceed 2: per pel"son referendum).. The i.onate share (:$' 1;he budget to be borne by each. sub- divil:don i:!'l the di std."rt is then compt~ted bused on the pro- portion of pee in the subdivision to the people in the ellst):"i ct.. 158,oh subdivision ce,n pay its share from existing revenues or it can ffifJ.ke a property tax leV'J to raise the money. If it fails t.o \1(; either the Park District oan oertify Ii Ie",.! t,Q the audi tor for the defa1l1 ting subd:ivLsion. . SUMM/lRY OF ENABLING LEGISLATION PEm.IITTING THE ESTABUSHMi:NT OF SmGLI COUNTY OR MULTI-COUNTY PARK DISTRICTS AS PASSED BY THE 1966 LEG ISLATURE METROPOLITAN AREA I I8TABLISHMENT OF PARK DISTRICTS BOUNDARIES AND ELECTION OF PARK BOARD PRIIIARY . DUTY I . PIIIBRB, Chapter 806 laws of Minnesota The law is of the enabling type au-chorizing the voters 01' their relected representativea to establish a Park D1strlot when and if they want to and with such boundaries as the7 want except that each district MUst include parts of several oounties or OD6 whole oounty, excluding Minneapolis and Ramsey County in either ease.. Park Districts may be single county (coterminous w1th a county except for Hennepin where Minneapolis is exoluded) or multi-county (con-caining parts of more than one coun~). Counties eligible to form distriots under the law arel Hennepin, Wright, Carver, Scott, Anoka, Dakota and Washington.. The establishment of a distriot is ini-clated by petitions to the oounty board. or boards from 1% ot the voters or a majority of the oity and village oouncils witb1a the proposed distriot. The distriot is established by resolution, single or joint, of the county board or boards, with or without a referendum and a1'ter publio hearing. The board or boards may ohoose to submit the question to a referendum and must do so if 1% of the voters petition ter t t.. If a refe rendum i8 he ld the board or boards must campl,.. with the outcome. In single oounty distriots a seven-man park board, appointed in the first instanoe by the oounty board and eleoted there- a1'ter, governs the distriot. The oounty is divided into tour distriots of equal size and one oommissioner 1s appointed and SUbsequently eleoted from each of the four distriots. Three oommissioners are appointed and Bubaequcat17 elected at large.. In the multi-oounty distriots the size and make-up ot thfJ park board is determined by joint resolution but they are elected, too tatter their first appointment. All oOllDll1saiou- ere serve tour year staggered terms t are not pa1d and cannot hold other publio office.. The primary duty of tile boards 1s stated to be ~ot the es-cablishment of parks and playgrounds of a looal or neighborhood oharaoter but rather the acquisition, devel~p- me:nt and maintenance of large parks, torest and other reservations and wlld lite sanctuaries, and ot means for- public acoess to historic sites and to lakes, riyerl and streams and to natural phenomena It. The boards haTe the powera generally given to a park boanl. inoluding, . . {) " ijf--" ...iL' ;-f:<:-"-'~ '-AJ...A,~' ., ""t , . .,. ""\ ,-. - ~ , ., a l~) t ^~. .... \ /:. f l' i t J f i , l . i ~ , , . i ! f } f I . I ( , J ;} 1 i 4 ~ . . " ~ r;'~~ ... SHOBiWOOD VILLAGJ PLANNING COMMISSION Minut.es of the Meetiong April 16, 19'7 The .eeting was held _t.t.he M1nnewaeht... school and was calle4worier by 1Ir. Janvrin. l'ollowingaelllbers w.~e p~esentl a.G. Ald~1t.t, .0... Bo~gen, M~.. R.J. Goodman, R..o. itand,y ,t!: .O.Haral.on,J .8. J..nv~1n, Geo. Lattemer, P. A. Skjervold, L. 0.. Swedlund. Mr. Janvrin a.ked it tne read.1ng otthe minutes of tne la.t.meeting should be di.pensed. with inasmuch aa this was a special meeting. Z<1r. A.1dr1.tteo movful, Mr. Handy .econd.od., and unanimous approval was given. Mr. Janvrin said that. tohia. knowledge no oonfirmed prepa.al tor "...lopMot. of t.he Brom'. property bad been submit.ted. toanyooe. However, we had been ..slu~d for a zoning recollllnendat.ion beoau.e t.he ShorewoodV1l1ageOouncU e~pected to act. on Mr. Naagle t 8 ru.ored request tor co_rctal zon1na on Apr1.l 2'. Hr. Swedlun.d mentioned. that it .was not wissto oonslder serlouelyrequest. torre-zoning 9t propert,y u.ntll a detinite propo.e.lot the development of that property had been S\lbllitted by the property owner, rather than by someone who .merely clairna an interest in the propert.,y. Mr. Ja.nvrln iJald that the propertY" ownerr "hould oo_t hi..elf' On the time element. 1nv01.04, i. e., wben construetion ot .. building would begin and when bU8intUJaWOuld be aotivated..so tt~t we will know whether We are conte~plating . current. project or a dream several years away. Mr. Swedlund moved that we refuse consideration ot a zoning requ.e.st untU specific plane for the development of the property in question haTe been submitted to the village. Mr. 80rgen seoonded and the oommission gave unanimous approval.. icir.. Borgen reiterated .ilia bellef that h.p!w....rdsontng ends in a slopp,y distribution of' co:m.ercial propertie.crewd.ed 'Ill' againet residenthl areas. He' tunnel' reco.:nmended that in order to inaugurate tb4l orderly developllent at acosnercial area inou.rvillago ea.ohcoa1..i.oner .houldbr1.n.c a stat.ementjJpecitYing e~a~tlooat.ion. where he .811eve. co...rclal zoning will be ac..ptable. Then we .can attemptt.o..olv... summary' rcu'SoJIDendation tortbe. v1118..&e oouncil. Mrlh Goodaan read her prepared statement outlining Q pla.nf'orcollUlerclal d.evelopunt on Highwa,y 7. tU'.Ja.nvrin reviewed ?4r. Bo.rien'.previou.sll submitted. .t..t....nt ootbe subject. Mr. J'anvr1nempha.1zed that each ...ber of the cOl'4ll1ission shOUld. oome to the .ne~t _et1ng with .apreparedste.tement. regarding zoning view8 80 that.. deolaration of intentions oan be ghentbe village council and 'tnepubl1c lrttoT$Eld t.n..t we are receptbe, or not reoept.1ve, to cone1dering given Bite. tor cOlDl'.ll8rclal development. Mt'.. $kjenold concu.rre4. Mr. Borgen request.d further data on taxe.and Mr. J'anvrln..aid he would work \lp 80aae bypot.tlcal ca.es comparing a c0lll11ero1al vent.ure tax-wi.. with _ residential developaent on the Brom', tract. Mr. Aldritt described property on Highwa,y 7 whloh couldCQnoeh8.blyb~ \lsect 00..r01a11y.Mr. Borgen aakedthatMrs.Ooodman co.pose a 11~t of all potential oo...rcial dt.. in the v1l1age,.leaving .. apaoe after e.oh ent.., on the Uat for comment., and ...1.1 a copy t.o eaoh member oftheplannlng co_helon. Then member. could t.our the arealnapecting 'theee si.te. .anct <I t ~. . ., ..2.. April 16th Minutes, cont.'d. brinl their cOllll1ent. top.ur next .81-1ng. Mr. Aldritt asked that a reoo~nd&tlonbe given the Yi11ageoounciltc take actlo~ en nuisances in o~r village. Specifioally,he &ove4 we reoo...nd. to the vUle.ge council that immediate action, be taken l"cr t.he remoYalot fou.r trailers located in t.he. Minnetenka' 14anor, are,. (violation Ordinance No. lO); that.. general notice be circulated toreaidenoe., thAt the constable will i_pose penalties tori_proper dhposal ot garbage and refuse (violation Section 1& 2, Ordinanoe Ko. 6); an4 that 25 sept 10 tanks be 8ubJectedto correctlYework (Mr. AldrittwUl give the lilt tc) the village clerk). Mr. Handy seconded and the IIOtion paSted un"nillOusly. Mr. Janvrin sWllll8.rizedthe proposals on parke. Mr.Skjervold lIloYedtbat. we recom:aend to the village counolladoption of Resolution it. whloh would. direot the state legislature to reduce the regulatory power ot cOWlty park boards over lakes. Mr. Borgen seconded andth. ooumd..do,na.pproved unanimolAsly. Mr. Skjervold then moved Resolution a which urge. a oounty park dbtric~. unanimously. ",e reoommend. that the vlllagecounoll r.ejedt the Hennepin County board to take action to create Mr. Sorgen seconded and this llOtion o.r~1.d Mr. Skjervold further ~ved that theShorewood Village Oouncil eX8.$~e the possibility otobta.ining la.ke shore property for tnepu.rpo$e ot aatabHening a swlm'l\ing beach. l4r.i\.ldritt seconded. and. unanilDou. appro....l vaa given. Mr. Janvrin set tho nextm.eetlng date tor May 7 and ad.journed the _.t1ng. Re spoettully sub_it"ted, Marion K. Goodman, Secretary lIg . r"''; . k . . . . . . . COPY SHOREWOOD VILLAGE PLANNING COMMISSION April 17, 1957 Mayor W. Dudley Kendrick Exoelsior Minn. Dear Mr. Kendriokl At the April 16 meeting of the planning commission, several recommendations for the village oouncil were adopted unaniaously by the nine members present. As a result of the indefinite information available regarding the Brom's property, we were unable to reach any conclusive recommend.ation on zoning, but the following resolution was adopted as a preoedent for all future zoning cases. Resolved. That the Shorewood Village Planning Commission refuse consideration of a zoning request until speoific plans for the development of the property have been subaitted to the village. The other recommendations follow. 1. That the village counoil take immediate action on the removal of four trailers located in the Minnetonka Manor area (violation Ordinance No. 10); that a general notice be circulated to residences stating that the constable will impose penalties for improper disposal of garbage and refuse (violation Section 1 & 2, Ordinance No.6); and that 25 septic tanks be subjected to corrective work (Mr. Aldritt will give the list of these 25 to the village clerk). 2. That the village council adopt Resolution A on the parks issue which would direct the state legislature to reduce the regulatory power of county park boards over lakes. ;. That the village council reject Resolution B on the parks issue which urges the Hennepin County board to take action to create a county park district. 4. That the village council examine the possibility of obtaining lake shore property for the purpose of establishing a swimming beach. The first recommendation was the result of a report on routine building inspection. The second and third evolved from a discussion of the data released by the Citizens League. Resolution A limits county jurisdiction to an area in close proximity to the actual park property on a lake shore. Resolution B would set up an advisory county park commission at considerable cost with no tangible benefits to our village. The fourth recommendation was based on Deephaven's request that we find a beach for the use of our children for swimming instruction. Respectfully yours, mg CCI E. Wiltsey, Village Clerk Trustees Schmidt, Fayfield, Arehart J. B. Janvrin, Chairaan . ,. SHORKliOOD VILlAGE PLANNING OOMHISSIOB Minut..s cftbe _etlnl May 7, 1957 The Heting wae held at the Mlnne_ehta school w1 tb the following .._bers pre8ent, H. G. Aldritt, D. N. Borgen, A. G. FlOk, Mr.. R.J. 0004un, R. I). Handy, E. C. haralson, J. B. J$Dvrin, P. A. Skjervoldand L. C.e Swedlund. Hr. Janvrin calledtbe aeetingto order alt4 ._it4tdtofr.Mt.lr.tin to 8~riH the proposed project tor the B.rom's property. A sketch of the type of bU11dblg to be constructed waf .hown and Mr. Muztin de.cribed It &egood-lookiftg and a credit to the co-.unlty. It would be ot colonb.! type architecture, one story., with thepoadble exceptlQt:l ot aaezzanine. rbere would be two aoc..ses to . the h1.chwat"hloh. are.Iready available and parking apace would be in tront Qtthe store.. 'f. no.... are to be parallel to the highwll'. Otlly an acoe88 alley woul4 be lnbaok: with posdbl, a buffer .t-rip ot unde...eloped acreage behio.d. the alley. In the questioning e.e.lon tollowing Mr. Murtin '. introduct1Qn,tJ1e fqllowin& lnt'Ql'ilation wa.gben. Untll Itr. ~rl'in and~r. Naegele can ...."'" Pros- peotive l...ee. ot anactualahoPPlng oenter, it 18 dltfioulttoietenlDe how u.ny atores will be included; thus the length ottbebl.llldlng 1. indetinite. At the lSlnilllUlll, a dozen unite would be included an44 to 6 ot the.e would be large ft!U8t!t bu8ine.... (Ola.s A type lea.e. IlkeWoolworth! and Red OWl). 11. i. hoped that construotion can b.gUl next .prin,_ Aa.,et no .011 teat.s have be. llI&de 1ft eonneotton with eewqe dllpo.al or su:rr.oe water drainaie. Mr. Murfin and Hr. Naegele are the 801e prinoipal.; they annotaoting .. agent.. They anticipate that the doll.Tinvestant will exeoed a halt million dollare. To date Shorewoo.4hae no cOlJ8lercial building codes,. but thesecgbe_d4l ae a follow-through On a projeot such as tbi.. However, a IIlOnga.e holder would require tire-proot construction, eto. Mr. HandYlIOved the. t baaed on the pro po .al tub.! t ted by .i(r. f.fl.lrf'inwe recoteencl to t.he vUlage council that the 8roa'. property be zoned .cOflllll8rcial 8ubject to a4equate proof byen.gineers that .e..age .and surfaoe water drain&J8oan be handled etre.ttvelyand on the condition that a bufter .trip of unde.eloped acrea.e be 1nolude4 bebind the aCce.. alley. )\ofr. Aldritt seconded ami the motion carried 1 to 2. The ainute. of the la.t two meetings were read and approved. Mr. Skjervold suggested that we vot.e on each area shown on the ., aepo.sible co..rclal property (see attached) ud submit the vote .countto.tbeY1l1age council to show the cOnO.tun.l8 otour opinion. on cOmtHrcblh.atlon. A - Yea (7-2) 0 --:fto (5-4) I - Ye.. 2, No. 2, , abstain B - Yet (6..;) D - te. (7..2) (Map marked incorrectly S position) ,.- Ye..;;No, 5; 1 abst.ain Mr. Skjervold IBOved t.ha.t we fleet only when a. 8pecific tor our consideration. Mr. Hat'al son seconded and the Mr. Janvrin will notity._bera or tb.enextaeetlng. meeting be adjourMd and Mr. .Janvrincoaplied. Respecttully problell l_prennt.ed $Otion passed \lnani-.o~.ll. Mr. . Handy moved that the 8ublllltt.ed, Marion .1\. GOO~Mn, . Secretar1 .. . . .' OOPY SHOREWOODVILLAGE PLANNING COMMISSION May 7, 1957 Mayor \f ..DI.ldley Kendrick Exoelsior Minn. Dear Mr. Kendrick I At the May 7 meeting of the Shorewood.Village PlanningCommissioD, the following recomm.endaticn WaS approved by a vote of 7 to 21 That the Shorewood Village Council zone the Brom' s property commercial based on Mr. Mw-tinl s descriptioD at the proposed development aDd sub ject to adequate proof by en&ineers that sewage and surtace water draln&.ie. oan be bandled.ttecti.,elYJ and on the conditioD that a buffer strip of undeveloped acreage be included behind the access alley. A sUDllD8.ry of the dhcusslonprecedingthis decision is given in the minutes of the May 7 meeting. Each member of the cOlllJlisslonwas given a copy of theattacm,d map to study and a vote was taken tod..termine which areas would be acceptable tor commercial development. We teelthis represents a general conceD8us of our opinions on the extent 'of commercialization desirable In our village. seotion J.. BO, a; .D E P Abstain !!.!. NO 7 "2 6 , 4 5 7 2 2 2 , 5 5 (M&rked incorrectly on map) 1 It is understood that each request for commercial zonil1g will be. given separate consUeration on its meri tsantl that this vote does not necessarily give blanket approval, or dlsapproval, to future requests for changes in zoning. Respectfully yours, J~ B. Janvrin, Chairman mg eel E. Wiltsey, Village Olerk Trustee. Arehart Fay.field Schmidt "',."~!..,~,"\, ,;;..j".'J:\J. 'i':, ..~ 1f . ~:.. C\, t '\ .~>~~c~ 4; nl-r t:r: :::~.~ 'iel ~;W .1\ 1,O\.:p~'i' '''IeEe ef):,,2 . em i :: :;; ~~'.1-r._t~1e)i .,-,' . ,';..., "'!!!~ tF' :iJ~ ~ If}--a.c:v ].n_:nr~~'" :-_ 0: ~ :', Ii <~ i" I' ~.. ,- 4 ...L..: .' ~'1_~-:";W(~~ :~ij:;;,.e:..;...~ ~ic t;.;~:??!:r:.~ s 1.0..,;oi ~::':t e. ,~0V j.~Z ~J ~. !;:J v ,.,;. "'! (~'j 1~ E ~,/ f~ G 1.;;" i:: 1; ~~~, :3,r:,'~~ ",', ~ 1='~ V:'lC-'~'~"iq e f~o,t~ ~c:1 ~;>:,' ~ ~i :it~,;':C:' ... .... ...;,: c- ,:,; W5t~1 ~,"_~~~.J f .B(f'i' ..J}i-Ci~; 9~!'.o..;O-~ . ;)~~ ,:),- O~,C ~~i' "''- ~_;..)"" ;./0 i.,~, .-. _"'. .., t ,h ~;,. .... ..... 'lj,.'~ , . -: ,', c: ':; .b ,",,; ,'" [.~ r:'; ,)c-~~:.; ":- lC-"':''!:"i ~'3:0l.., ::.s;::;.. s~e;...~t';i: ~:~"P J~. 17:'Vf".l; ~~i.H''!;1,tt.~3'j'~!,e b~:!1:~f~..e~ 3d~La~) -,~p.f~l-.$1.( ~8J.sw ~~:.i~'}.-::'.Le 1)f'f3 e~.e"t;'ee f;; ;,~ t. .:-'-:;; ::, . . ~ ,.. v; l:it: '':C; o .: ''!: S.? ; \ I " _~'<tij' ,,",l;li :.:' . ;._~~ li" _i--' ~ ~: :~; ~~', -"..;..... ~, ~....!"-iJ .:..""'l .... "iC "', ,~, '.r.; i ::..-'1 $0 ~-},j f':.' ;, j [':-1 , . . ~J '..~n .11. :'~. :,:.": c :'l::';T~:P 1 i; eciJ 'i"'f 'U.:: .8.1: i-,jOt..__L '( ""'. .....,..,... ::..,.....J ~: E J'L. ;>.'".:.,i!L j c :P.}JR ~~ ya~': F ~~~l~ :,~~,' .i:-. "' $(I.! '+,) "l ~~ i .:.: r,~!'- ~. ": ~. It., ,.; Sf~~'!_.t ..:~~j :,!, $1: l 1t1 ~.~:- ~: .,~; r. -,. I1e:>!;.;. j [.8W sJ-:." 1;1 r!r~ f~ v,toLl.! G: -.~. .:' r' z:,':.'~ _... , .~"', ~'~.~f,'S~~':f_~ ~:~~- Cl.........~:- .:f-'~'... ~." . '. .. .~~!~;::-r .~. .i~-~?~t. l,pi ~j';";: ';:~i:~.:'::C:, "~'....l ...;;; ,6r.r.l'"v . ~ d t."i.1 ,t, f'~ ;:''''~... .~' 1 r;")~- -_-~~. 7';"'e~: ~:, n~ ~::rl~~l! J=--, '1J.)-0 ':0 f' .i ~j .jf. ~i;- ---"- 8~ f'1c:1Jt}(,(~~ -,~,.,~-,,--- ~ , <.. " fI ~ r" ",. ., , . ~ s, ... ('t i-:.r.' ; ,-; i J- 4. i t;~""~', ..~, ",0 " ?~' :,<~t-..,,~:- 8L ;;'1 _ ~ :.~<-. e :'11 _ ..;I $t< ~rr ;70; 'e. '''(~-!. .:cv .I. 'l'~ J'["f.~ F~ 11",:'8-.\'. ? - ..:;,),- .,~;.. ;'L C<<f' t ~!'<\i'O."'. b '1:; :;i....C~. 'fc'..:3 .6;j3r s-~ ("l! j c:::: A ::; '1'0 l t3~~8.t v::l'l~~~.~:.~~ tJ' r'.!. ~~ "':.~ ~~." .~i. .. --"--1 J.i~3l~ ;;'\~~E~- f\ l~t~3~rj . .;:.. '~'.!j.:.) ~';.~~, :5,Ji e. :)-9 :eU'l J bb,r:'<.B',) !'11:c;r; ~e '. . . I , . J J \ COPY: ~ SHOREYOOD VILLAGE PLANNING COMHISSIOB r~yor w. Dudley Kendrick Excelsior Minn. Dear Mr. Kendrick: !.fay 7, 1957 At the May 7 meeting otthe Shorewood fillage Planning Co.u.asion,the following recoramendat.ion was approl'ed bya vot.e of 7 t.a2' That. the Shor&wood Villflge Oouncil zone the Brom's Property cOmlD6.rcial based on Mr. Mu.rtin's deac.ript.ionof' the proposed development. and subject to adequate ~root .l)y engineers t.hat sewage and surface water drainage can .beharldlederf'ecti..e11i____ C;~ i~:l::d c~~~~o.~h:~:C:8:~~:,~t.rlP of undeveloped &.Creag:) A 8wB"1'I8.ry ot the,Uscussion preceding this decision.. ie giYen in the minutes ot the May 7_eting. Each member of the. commisdon was giYena copy of theat.tached _p to st.udy and e. vote was ta~n to determine. wnicharee.s wO\1.1d~e e.ccept.able for commercial de'leloplBfmt. .lte teel. this represents agenal'_l cc>ncenswa ot our opinions on the extent-ot cODl,'lI&rclalization dedrable inou;- village. Section A B o D B , tes !9. T 2 6 ; 4 5 7 2 2 2 , 5 Abstain 5 (Marked incorrectly onap) 1 It b understood that each request for commercial zoninc will be<giYen 8epal'ate cot'uJi.deration on its merits andthatthi, voted08a not necessarily give blanket approval, or4l.approval, to future requests tor changes 1n. zoning. ResP,i8cttully yours, A ,/1 /'01 ;\~-A--t.....- ~ .r{ ...... - - ~ --c...-, J. I;B. Jat\vrin, ChalI'lJl8.n i 1 V .. CCt E. Wiltsey, Village Chrk Trusteos Arehart Fay f'1el d Sehll1dt . . . . .. " lll!oL()~p .,tj..~A(I~ l'l.AN~tRG aoilMtllstJ A1n~tes of the Meeting ~ 7, 1957 . I The .eeting wa.held at the Mlnnewa.htaechool with the f'ollowing ._ben pre se at. & Ii. G. Aldrltt,D. N. 8orgen,A. G. 'iok, Mr..R. J. Goo4man, R. D. Han4y, &.0. Haralson, J. B. Janvrin, 1'. A.. Skjervolelan4t. 0.aw.41uncl. Mr. Janvrin called the_et.ingt-o order .and ....ked~r. M\.trtin to, sUlllllar1~ the proposed project tor the Brof.l'. property. A .ketch 01' the type of building to be eonetruetedw... ahown andKr. Uurtin desoribed it a. good-looking and. credit to tbeoomaunit.y. It would b. of colonial t.ype architecture, one story, wUhthepoadble exoeption of' a ,"zzan1.ne. Ther.';'ould tle two aoc..se. to thehighwllTwhich are. already ayallable and parlc.it\l spaoewottld be..1.ntront 01' the store.. The .tons are to be Parallel 1,0 the highway. OJ'llyan acoe.. alley would be 1" baok with pouibly abutter .trip 01' \1.nd..,.loped aoreage behind the aUey. In the q\.l..tlonlng ....ion f'oHowingMr.MUrtin'.'1ntroduoti01l,the. fe>llow1ng intoraaation was gben. until Mr. M\1.rtlnan<1 Mr. Naeg.l..oana.sureproe- pectiye has... 01' an ..otUlll shopping oenter,.ltb difficult toaetermine how uny .toreswillbe include'h th\ll the length of' tbe b\lllding. 1. indetini te. At theillini.., a dozen \1.nl t. wO\.l~d be incl\lde4 and 4 t.o6 of the.e wO\.lld be> largenaaebu.ineue. (Olase A type l.ases U.ke WOolworth. and Re<i Owl). It i.hoped that. construction oan beginnext.~dn&. A. yet no soU te.t.. have been mate in cOnnection wltn sewagediapcsal ors\l.rta.. water drainage. Mr. Murtin and Mr. Naegele are the 801eprino1pal.; they &1"e not act1ng a, &lentl. They anticipate th.t the dollar l.n.....t.ent will exoeed a half .illion doUat.. To date Shorewood ha.s no QOlllllercial buHdingcodea, but th.se canbe.de a. a toll ow-through on aprojeot sucba. this. However, alROt'tgagenold'" would require tire-proot. construction, eto.. Mr. Handy rao...ed, that band on the propo88.1.\.lbmltte4 by M1". Murtin we reo()lllll8n4 to the Yillage cOW1cil that the Brora' 8 property be ~oned co.ercial.ub'eo1. to adequate proof by. engineer. that sewage and surface waterdrain",e can. .be handlet ett.ctively anion the eondi tlon tbat & btlf'ter .t.rip 01' uncl.veloped acreage b. lncl\.lded. Deblnd the e.ccenaUey. Mr. Aldritt. second.eland-tbe motion carried 7 to 2. The ain\.ltes of' the l..t two meetings weretead and approved. Mr. Skjervold 8ugg'.lSted t.hatwe yoteon eaoh are. .nown on th.e map a.possible oomme rclal property ( s....ttached) and 8\.1blllit. the'lote COW'lt tot.he '11111.'. council to show the ct:>ncensu.ot' our Qpinlonlll on collltlercidization. A - Yea (7-2) 0.- No)(5-4) S>- Yel, i; No, 2; 5abstaia B - Ye. (6-') 1J - y..(7-2) (Map _rked lnoorrect.lyEpo.U.iQn) ,.- X'e.,'} No, 5; I.betain Mr. Sk.1ervold JlOyedthat.we...t on11 when ...pecltic tor our consideration. Mr. Harahlonsecond.d and the Mr. JanyrinwUl notify._bers of the next ...tine.. meeting be adjourned aM Mr. J'anY'rlncomplied. ae.pecttully probl... ~. pre..nt.d JaOtlonp.....di~illlOu.ly. Mr. Bamly' mo".d. that. tn. sublllltted, }.farlon J{. Good..." .secretar1 111 r .). .~~/7 . . . .1 / OQeI.. r '. aH~REWOOD VilLAGE PtANNINGOOMMlSSION' April 17, 1957 Mayor W. Dudley Kendrick Exoeldor Minn. Dear Mr. lendr1cka At the April 16 Metbalof the pl..nnilla oo=d.ulQn, severa.l re.oMemia,\lons fOr the Y1!lageooWloUwere..tlopted W'ulnll1Ously b1 the nine .aberapr...nt. Ae a re.w. t of the 1ncleflnitelntorutlon ..yaUable regarding the aro.'. property, we were WUlble t.ereach al1T con.lul1v. reo9...datlon on~on1n&, bat t.he followlni roaolut.19n WIlL. a.dopted a. a precedent. tor allfut.ure zoning c...... Re.ahed: That the ShQrewood fillale 1'1l1nn.1nl; Oo_18l1on. rettUJe .0".ld....tlGn of a zonina;reqWist W1til.lped.tlo plane for the dev.lop.ntot the property ~Ye be.1). ~bJJdtted to the.yUI..a;e. The other reoo..nda tlon.toll OWl 1. That the yil1agecounoil ta.keilllm6diate aotlon9nt.n. reltO.....l<ot fov trailere looated in.t.he Minnetonka Manor atea(Y1Qlat.lonOl"d1.ttaDQe Bo. 10); that a ,eneral .notloe be clrQulat.ect to re..lden... .tatina;tha1othe con.table w111 impose penalties tor illlproperd.\.IJpon.lor,arba..and .."ru.. (violation Seotion 1 &. 2, Ordlna.nceNo. 6)) an. that 2.5 septlo tanka be. subjected. t.o oorrectl...e work (Mr. Aldr1tt wU1 .&i...e the 11.et of t.be.. 25 to tbe vi11.ge ~lerk). 2. Tbat tbe .ill~e council ad..opt.Reaolut.ion Aon theparlc.. issu. whioh would dir.ct t.he ,tat.e legtelature to reduce the regw.atory power of oount.y parkboartb .oyer lak... ,. That the ~1l1&.ge council reJectR.aelution B onthepe.rlt. 1..uewhlcb urge. t.he Hennepin Oount1 boar4t.o t.au aotion t.o cr.ate. county parle: district. 4. That t.he YUlage oouncil .UIline tbepQuibtl1.f,y ot obta.lniq lake .-bore propel"t.ytor the pttrpos. ot .atab11shin& a .wllUdng....oh. Thet1rat recollDlOndat.ion wa. theresul t ot a report.. Qr'l rout~n. bu.U<U.n& in.peetion. The .eoond. and third evolyed tro. a diacuu10not thetlata . relea.ed by tn.CU.ti.en. J,.ea.ga. Resolut.1onA 11..1t.s oounty jUl'i'diotlon to an ..rea 1n clo.e proximity t.o t.he aotual park property on a 1&.ke .81'101'.. a.solu.tionS wow.dset up ..n advisory <)ottntTparlc. 00_1..1011 ..toonsld.erabl. coat with 1).0 tangible ben.fit.. t.oour 1111a,e. 'I'he fourth re.C:o....ndatlon .... bas.d on.oe.phl!L....n'. re que at. that "'e flnd a beactlfor .t.he Uae otO'llr ohildren for swl~ing instruction. 11& OCI E. Wiltsey, fUlageOlerk., TN.t.... .Scbmidt., raytteld. .A.rehart &...fi.m... !I~.. ..t.!~l.l. y10u..r.... \l'../~ J.t .. . nvr1n, Ohalr.n !I../ ./ i; i / v' . . ;,.~. . .\..r <F fi ~~" a. 'Y.",\' '.. '.' 2\' ~ i . . . ,I ' ~..~ ~c t Q2f!. SHOREWOOD VILLAGE PLANNIBa COMMISSIOH .pril " .1957 Mayor W. Dudley Kendrick Exoelsior Minn. Re: Special Permit for Garage on Lloyd Graham Property Dear Mr. Kendrick: Tbe Shorewood fillage Planning Ooa~lssion met on April 2 and discussed Lloyd Graham's request for a special permit to erect a three car cement block garage for the . purpose of conducting s-.11 repair work. There were eight _mbers present; the vote was unanilllO\ll!t for the lasuanee of a speclal permit. Mr. Gre.haJa p.lal'1S to construct the new garage at the back of his drbeway behind hie present garage and will handle small repair jobs including lawn JIOwer repairs in conjuactlon with his Torodea.lerah1p. -t JJ In vlew of the ract that a speoi,al permit can be re.oltedshouldl' be abused, the planning coJlDtia.ion favored Mr. Grahallllsreq\l8st.. ~.ctt"lly yours, ,/ /. . I ; -"0.: .. CCt E. Wiltsey, Village Olerk: H. Sobaidt R. rayfield v...." 1). Arehart .J.a./An.rin, ChairJUll ;ShotAwood Village PlannlngCommission i r-- hot . -',;> .......... J,!!~=\,-- "-'-'~'-'-'----""""-'!I"'_'":'!W'_'; ~-- ,t-.Mwport I' ,Township , '. , . osed shopping centers in Minneapolis .area. (See tables below.) Centers Open and Building Floor space Num"'erof (thousand Numb., Approximate '.arking acrefin Yeor Name Location ,q, If,) ,lor., fOJt Capacity project opened Southwest 1 Southdale France Ave. So. & 66th 800 65 $20,000,000 5,200 82 2 Knollwood Plaza Highway # 7 & Texas 250 34 3,200,000 2,500 35 3 Richfield Hub 66th & Nicollet 110 30 ] ,800,000 1,900 18 4 Miracle Mile Excelsior Blvd. & Belt Line 110 26 1,000,000 600 11 5 SouthdaleSquare 66th & Xerxes Ave. S. 83 20 1,000,000 500 8 6 Lilac Way Excelsior Blvd. & Belt Line 50 11 200,000 600 8 7 Clover 98th & Lyndale Ave. So. 50 10 650,000 500 6 8 The Village 78th & Penn Ave. So. 44 10 500,000 650 8 9 Texa-Tonka Minnetonka Blvd. & Texas 43 15 400,000 350 10 10 Town & Country 78th & Portland 40 19 500,000 300 4 11 Penn-66 Penn Ave. So. & 66th 35 9 400,000 300 5 12 Westwood Cedar Lake Road-Louisiana 22 7 200,000 120 2 13 Bloomdale France & Old Shakopee Rd. 20 12 250,000 750 5 SOUTHWEST TOTALS 1,657 268 30,100,000 Northwest W. Broadway &. BassLk Rd 165 14 Crystal 25 3,000,000 3,000 27 ]955 15 Robin Center Hy. # 52 & 42nd Av. N. 118 18 1,200,000 1,400 12 1955 16 Northbrook Hy, #100& LoganAv. N. 96 21 1,800,000 950 18 1955 - 17 St. Anthony Hy. #~ & Lowry Av. NE. 83 22 375,000 1,100 10 1950 18 Golden Valley Olson Hy. & Winnetka 58 19 500,000 1,500 9 1954 19 Coon Rapids E. River Rd. & Hy. # 10 56 18 700,000 3,000 10 1954 20 East Gate University &CentralAv. NE 50 13 500,000 130 2 .1955 21 Golden Hills Wayzata Blvd & Turners Rd 35 9 220,000 200 5 1950 NORTHWEST TOTALS 661 145 8,295,000 ortheast Hillcrest Center Who Bear Av & Larpenteur 225 30 1,750,000 1,500 15 1950 Lexington Plaza Lexington & Larpenteur 124 32 1,500,000 700 7 1951 24 Northway Hy. #8 near Lexington 44 15 600,000 2,000 .23 1955 25 Labarre Mahtomedi Hy. # 100& # 244 38 7 350,000 300 4 1956 26 White Bear Avenue White Bear Av, & Montana 35 7 700,000 300 5 1952 27 Snelling Hub Snelling & County Road B 34 12 335,000 700 15 1954 28 Parkway Rice & Wheelock Pkwy. 25 5 300,000 200 2 1951 29 Sunrise Park Who Bear Av. & Cty. Rd. E 20 8 185,000 150 3 1953 NORTHEAST TOTALS 545 116 5,720,000 Southeast 30 Sunray Terrace . Hy. #12 & East Av. 180 20 2,000,000 1,430 20 1957 31 Highland Center Cleveland & Ford Pkwy. 170 30 2,550,000 400 32 Signal Hills So; Robert & Orme 100 23 1,750,000 1,200 35 1955 33 Sibley Plaza West 7th & Davern 41 25 600,000 500 6 ]955 34 Doddway So, Smith & Dodd Rd. 26 7 400,000 300 4 1956 SOUTHEAST TOTALS 517 105 7,300,000 GRAND TOTALS 3,380 634 . 51,415,000 Shopping Centers Planned Floor SDoce No. nF 'Yeor lthou.ond Numb., Appro1Cimafe Parking acres in to.be Name location sq, fl.) stores (ost Capacity prolect opened Southwest 35 Southtown Center 78th bet. By. # 65& Penn 450 50 10,000,000 3,700 46 1959 36 Hobby Court 80th & Penn Av. S. 100 40 1,200,000 850 25 1958 37 Unnamed E, Lake & 22nd Av. S. 80 12 1,200,000 650 8 1957 38 South port . France & Old Shakopee Rd. 40 8 400,000 500 12 1957 39 Shoperama Cedar & Old Shakopee Rd. 37 5 500,000 500 10 1957 SOUTHWEST TOTALS 707 115 13,300,000 Northwest 40 Northcrest NWCor. Univ&Hy #100 260 40 5,000,000 2,500 35 41 Northtown Univ. NE, & Hy. # 10 ]25 26 1,500,000 2,200 60 42 Stinson Center 37th & Stinson Blvd. NE. ]24 24 1,500,000 2,000 36 43 St. Anthony Lowry Av. NE & Hy. #8 120 22 1,400,000 700 11 4 Shorewood Hy. #65,.7 mi. N.of #100 80 16 1,000,000 700 20 NORTHWEST TOTALS 709 128 10,400,000 rtheast 45 Roseville ' Lexington & Larpenteur 250 25 2,500,000 1,500 15 1957 120,- 46 Rose Plaza Snelling & Hy. #36 165 25 1,250,000 ],400 ]6 1957 e of- 47 Twin Plaza Rice & Arlington 150 26 3,000,000 2,000 24 1958 gency 48 Minnehaha Concourse Minnehaha & Chatsworth 60 12 500,000 750 7 1957 mber NORTHEAST TOTALS 625 88 7,250,000 Southeast s not 49 Midway Center University & Snelling 375 30 6,000,000 1,700 27 rom- 50 South Grove lnver Grove, Hy. # 56 36 10 500,000 700 15 iation SOUTHEAST TOTALS 411 40 6,500,000 GRAND TOTALS 2,452 371 37,450,000 , 1980 . al a value..packed price size freeze area . Ideal for fast-freezing fish arid game . All food stores within arm's rep:ch . Upright design saves valuable space . Styled with popular new square lines . Nothing down, up to 24 months to pay lbs. of frozen food on 3 door shelves , safety-type door I interior, copper trim ), Dayton's Appliance Store-Downtown, 5th Floor; Dayton'. Southdale, Lower Level .1. Ie! '56 Hoover vacuum Mfl'. list pl'ice 89.95 4995 Imagine! Deluxe triple-action Hoover cleaning 40.00 off list Pd. lightweight cleaner that g'ets all the deep-down, color dulling dirt. s disposable bags. Attachment set for canister convenience, List 13.95, 9.88 Dayton's ApplianCe Store-Downtown, ~)th Floor; Dayton's Southdale, tower Leve' Shop Downtown; Monday 910 8:45; Tuesday through Saturday, 9 to~:30. Southdale:Monday. Thunda . . . " v' ~ , RESOLVED I 'l'bato, .1.. no t.... ot ott1ce vu t1&8d tor' tbePlatmtnc o,-.1..10n appoint.ed in 1961, .uob. t.en eball be oou14en4t.o uye gp1rMl o.oeab&r 31, 1." Tbat.,. new P1Il\tdna Co-.s.loc of _ .......... <.elect.Ofito n___nt. to. V11a,u u a wbol.> be Ilppo1nt.ed ....... ,._ t.o ..rve 4v1. \.bat oal.bdv 1Mr' that, the ._,.. (OM ot wtaoa abaU. tie d..1pt.ed Cba1ran) 1ha11 be appointed b.r tbeMqar. wtthtobe approval ot a _jo...it,ot tbaeo.ol1J 'I'bat. tMeo.1..ionl. f'lm,ot,ton abaU ... ,...11 aciv1aoI'J to the Counoll, And, tobat 1\ aball CODOem. ItMlt with aU _tt..... cOaMotod witb ton. reC\llat.lon of 1aD4 U covlu"odtn Vl11ap ONt.._ No. e. SpecJt1calq the Co.a..tOI1 aha11 oould.,., ~ nport. it. reeo_ndattou t;.o .tb$. C01ll101l on, all app1toatlonll tOI" aPf)cl81 .. pondt.. IOntDl cbaDpa and propoaod adJust._nt.., acept10u 8.DIli _DdMnt.to ordlnaneo Jto. S. It abal1 also tOdW.at.e lone 1"a.I'JCeplaJ'1ll tor lJll1ot'lll.t..loll. ot tile Council in oonnectlon \lith. ovor-all uUllu.Uon ot land v1t..bic the ViU..,.. ~ ~ ~ '-