10-10-23 CC Reg Mtg Agenda Packet
CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING COUNCIL CHAMBERS
TUESDAY, OCTOBER 10, 2023 7:00 P.M.
For those wishing to listen live to the meeting, please go to ci.shorewood.mn.us/current_meeting for
the meeting link. Contact the city at 952.960.7900 during regular business hours with questions.
AGENDA
1. CONVENE CITY COUNCIL MEETING
A. Pledge of Allegiance
B. Roll Call
Mayor Labadie___
Callies___
Maddy___
Sanschagrin___
Zerby___
C. Review and Adopt Agenda
Attachments
2. CONSENT AGENDA The Consent Agenda is a series of actions which are being considered for
adoption this evening under a single motion. These items have been reviewed by city council and city
staff and there shall be no further discussion by the council tonight on the Consent Agenda items.
Any council member or member of city staff may request that an item be removed from the Consent
Agenda for separate consideration or discussion. If there are any brief concerns or questions by
council, we can answer those now.
Motion to approve items on the Consent Agenda & Adopt Resolutions Therein:
A. City Council Work Session Minutes of September 25, 2023 Minutes
B. City Council Regular Meeting Minutes of September 25, 2023 Minutes
C. Approval of the Verified Claims List Claims List
D. LMCIT Liability Coverage Waiver City Administrator Memo
E. Approve Retail Tobacco License Renewals City Clerk/HR Director Memo
Resolution 23-098
F. Approve Resolution of Support Mill Street Trail and Watermain Planning Director Memo
Capital Bonding Request Resolution 23-100
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA
Page 2
G. Approve Website Contract with CivicPlus City Clerk/HR Director Memo
H. Approve Recruitment for Seasonal Rink Attendants City Clerk/HR Director Memo
I. Approve WAC Assessment Agreement 26370 Peach Circle City Administrator Memo
Resolution 23-101
J. Encroachment Agreement for 5880 Prestwick Court City Engineer Memo
Resolution 23-102
K. Approve HVAC Maintenance Agreement Public Works Director Memo
3. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR This is an opportunity for members of the public to bring an item,
which is not on tonight's agenda, to the attention of the Council. Anyone wishing to address the
Council should raise their hand, or if attending remotely please use the “raise hand” function on your
screen and wait to be called on. Please make your comments from the podium and identify yourself
by your first and last name and your address for the record. Please limit your comments to three
minutes. No discussion or action will be taken by the Council on this matter. If requested by the
Council, City staff will prepare a report for the Council regarding the matter and place it on the next
agenda.
4. REPORTS AND PRESENTATIONS
5. PARKS
6. PLANNING
A. Review Agreements Related to Lake Park Villas Planning Director Memo
Applicant: TSML Properties Resolution 23-103
Location: 24250 and 24320 Smithtown Road
7. ENGINEERING/PUBLIC WORKS
A. Eureka Road Open House Report City Engineer Memo
8. GENERAL/NEW BUSINESS
9. STAFF AND COUNCIL REPORTS
A. Staff
B. Mayor and City Council
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA
Page 3
10. CLOSED SESSION
Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, section 13D. 05, subdivision 3(b), as permitted by Attorney
Client Privilege, the City Council will be moving into a Closed Session to discuss Alex and
Elena Ugorets v. City of Shorewood, et al.
11. ADJOURN
2A
CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION MEETING COUNCIL CHAMBERS
MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 25, 2023 5:45 P.M.
MINUTES
1. CONVENE CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION MEETING
Mayor Labadie called the meeting to order at 5:47 P.M.
A. Roll Call
Present. Mayor Labadie; Councilmembers Labadie, Callies, Maddy, Sanschagrin, and
Zerby; City Attorney Shepherd; City Administrator Nevinski; Parks and Recreation
Director Crossfield; City Clerk/HR Director Thone; Finance Director Rigdon;
Director of Public Works Morreim; and, City Engineer Budde
Absent: None
B. Review Agenda
Maddy moved, Zerby seconded, approving the agenda as presented. Motion passed 5/0.
2. MILL STREET WATERMAIN
City Engineer Budde explained that the County was the lead agency for the Mill Street trail project
which is slated to extend from Chanhassen to Excelsior with construction in 2025. He stated that
staff has been evaluating whether the City should include watermain as part of this project. He
reviewed information related to inquiries from residents for connecting to municipal water due to
the age of the existing wells; the area served by Chanhassen; the possible interconnect of the
east-west systems; and possible design options. He gave a brief overview of the financial and
budget considerations for Council review. He noted that staff had previously submitted a State
bonding fund request for this project and explained that there may also be some other funding
options that the City can pursue but staff would like feedback from the Council on whether or not
they would like the City to pursue adding watermain in this area or not.
Councilmember Callies asked about the parameters for making a decision between an eight inch
and a twelve inch pipe size.
City Engineer Budde stated that once the two systems are connected, which may be decades
away, the twelve inch will be able to provide water back and forth through the systems and was
also a factor in some of the fire flow for serving the City.
Councilmember Callies stated that she feels that the cost is a disincentive to get City water. She
asked if the City had done the analysis on assessment and a possible property value increase.
She stated that from what City Engineer Budde had presented, the City would be losing about
forty-thousand dollars with each hook up and asked if the property value would increase by that
much.
CITY OF SHOREWOOD WORK SESSION COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
SEPTEMBER 25, 2023
Page 2 of 10
City Engineer Budde stated that he did not have that information and explained that the City would
need to talk to an appraiser but cautioned that even if they did that, he believes that this
information is highly contested.
Councilmember Sanschagrin asked if the City knew how many of the twenty-nine homes in this
area would hook up to City water.
City Engineer Budde stated that he did not and explained that he just knows that he had been
called between about five and ten times about hook ups in this area. He admitted that it could
have been the same handful of residents calling because he did not keep track of who had called.
He reiterated that they had not conducted a formal survey.
Mayor Labadie noted that even if a formal survey was conducted, the resident would have the
option to change their mind.
City Engineer Budde stated that was correct and clarified that the City’s current policy is that they
will not force someone to connect to City water.
Councilmember Callies stated that she thinks it will come down to how much it will actually cost.
Councilmember Zerby stated that to him, this seems like a very short amount of pipe for this
amount of money. He asked where the primary costs were coming from for this project.
City Engineer Budde stated that when there is an open cut scenario, much of the cost is in the
pavement and for directional drilling it is more the material and installation costs. He explained
that there is a fair amount of risk with directional drilling. He stated that he believes this section is
about one-half mile long or about two-thousand feet.
Councilmember Zerby stated that means that two-thousand feet costs $1.5 million. He asked if
they would go down the right-of-way in the State highway in order to connect the wells.
City Engineer Budde stated that they could do that but explained that the downfall would be that
the run would not provide any service to residents which means there would be ‘dead’
infrastructure costs.
Councilmember Maddy asked if only a handful of people decided to connect if the City could
guarantee water quality to those individuals.
City Engineer Budde stated that he would have to look into that a bit more but would assume that
the City would just need to flush a hydrant more often in that scenario in order to force the water
to turn over.
Councilmember Callies noted that one of the Council’s jobs is to look toward the future, but
expressed the opinion that this seemed like a lot of money even though she understands the
thought process behind doing something when the road will already be torn up.
Councilmember Sanschagrin agreed that this does not seem to make sense from the City
perspective, but also did not make sense from the consumer perspective.
CITY OF SHOREWOOD WORK SESSION COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
SEPTEMBER 25, 2023
Page 3 of 10
Mayor Labadie shared a story of when she had first joined the Council when there were discussion
City water near Star Lane and noted that this entire neighborhood was on board with the desire
for City water and she was not sure they had that same feeling from this neighborhood.
Councilmember Callies stated that even if they, theoretically, were on board it will still come down
to the cost of putting in a well or hooking up with City water.
City Administrator Nevinski stated that if the Council was thinking that the watermain is not the
path forward then they will need to modify their State bonding request information. He noted that
they have looked at alternative funding options with the hope that they would be able to get the
fifty percentage bonding money from the State.
Councilmember Callies asked if there was any benefit to the City to have City water in this
location.
City Engineer Budde stated that it would expand the emergency response area, for example, to
have hydrants in the area. He stated that it would also help fill the gap between the east and west
system, but cautioned that the Council would have very tough decisions at each of these
increments to get it. He noted that if the lot sizes were smaller, the cost would come down
significantly.
Councilmember Zerby stated that it is expensive to expand water and did not believe it was
exclusive to this portion of the City and asked how the City can justify expansion elsewhere in the
City.
Councilmember Callies asked if individual wells ate up the groundwater more than a municipal
system would.
City Engineer Budde stated that he would say that the usage really would not change whether it
was a private well or municipal, but noted that they do tend to come from different aquifers. He
stated that there is no current requirement for watermain like there has been for sanitary sewer
mains and noted that there has been talk about this become a mandate at some point in the
future, but would say that is in the far distant future.
Councilmember Maddy asked about Mill Street in this area and future plans for road work.
City Engineer Budde explained that the County has actually tweaked what they were planning
and will narrow Mill Street and resurface it all as part of the trail project which will be built within
the right-of-way. He stated that he would not imagine that they would end up having to do anything
significant to the roadway for another thirty years or so.
Mayor Labadie asked where the water would be pulled from if here was need for fire mitigation in
this area.
City Engineer Budde stated that the closest hydrants are located in Chanhassen and Excelsior
has watermain extended down Mill Street.
Councilmember Sanschagrin asked how many hydrants would be installed if this moved forward.
CITY OF SHOREWOOD WORK SESSION COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
SEPTEMBER 25, 2023
Page 4 of 10
City Engineer Budde stated that he believed they would be installed about every block or so,
which would be about six.
Councilmember Sanschagrin stated that he would like to have information on who would plan to
hook up and asked if it would provide Shorewood City water.
City Engineer Budde noted that this project, as proposed, would serve Shorewood residents, but
would be from water that is generated and provided by Chanhassen.
Public Works Director Morreim stated that he believes the City would pay Chanhassen for water
and then charge the residents the fees in order to pay for the water and the maintenance of the
watermain.
Councilmember Maddy asked about the life expectancy of the pipe.
City Engineer Budde stated that he would estimate it to be about fifty years.
Mayor Labadie asked if there would be a way to get an accurate accounting for who would hook
up.
City Engineer Budde stated that he did not think so unless the City required them to pay the hook
up fee when they expressed interest.
Councilmember Callies stated that the hook up fee of ten thousand dollars would not be enough
money which means the City should be raising the amount for the hook up charge.
City Engineer Budde stated that was correct, however, it was not the issue that they were intended
to solve during tonight’s discussion.
Councilmember Callies stated that she feels asking staff to go out and see who would be
interested in hooking up to water is dithering because it is a moving target.
City Engineer Budde noted that they have not asked these residents yet and noted that on some
of the other projects, they have. He noted that when they asked this question for projects such as
Strawberry Lane, the City still really did not get a firm answer from the residents.
City Administrator Nevinski suggested that the Council may want to look at this with the idea that
if the City would be on the hook for the seven-hundred fifty thousand dollars what their opinion
would be about the project and the idea of taking out a loan or finding a way to make up the
differences. He asked if the idea was that if they get the fifty percent in bonding from the State if
they were comfortable committing to move forward but if they do not receive that bonding, they
would not. He asked if that would be a position the Council would be comfortable with.
Councilmember Callies asked about the timing of the bonding application and the project. She
asked if they would wait until they found out the answer about the bonding in order to have
something more definite to tell people about their actual cost.
City Engineer Budde stated that the project is being constructed in 2025 and the bonding
information should be available from the State by May of 2024. He stated that there is still time
CITY OF SHOREWOOD WORK SESSION COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
SEPTEMBER 25, 2023
Page 5 of 10
and noted that they have already communicated with the County that they were still evaluating
this.
Councilmember Sanschagrin stated that he thinks the City would want to have some commitment
from the local residents, in advance, including a deposit.
Councilmember Callies stated that she feels the City should submit for the bonding and get more
information at that point. She stated that she did not think it was just a matter of charging the
citizens. She stated that it is the Council’s job to look toward the future and determine if this water
is something that would benefit additional residents in the future.
Councilmember Zerby referenced other nearby watermain projects and the additional costs for
that as well.
Mayor Labadie stated that she believed the entire Council had expressed concern about the
potential cost, the question of who would actually hook up, and the possibility that they would not
receive State bonding funds.
Councilmember Callies noted that she felt the middle ground would be to apply for the State
bonding and then evaluate the actual costs once they had that information.
There was consensus of the Council to apply for the State bonding and re-evaluate this in
May.
City Administrator Nevinski noted that the Council will also need to have a larger conversation
about financing, policies, and land use.
3. AGENDA STRUCTURE DISCUSSION
City Administrator Nevinski noted that staff was looking for a bit of direction on the agenda
structure. He gave an overview of the specific areas that they would like input, including: Consent
Agenda; Items being added to the agenda; Commissioner presentations; possible creation of
Council policies/bylaws; and interactive technology, such as Zoom.
Mayor Labadie noted that that they were running a bit short on time tonight, but noted that none
of these items are pressing or effect the City’s budget. She stated that she did not think they would
be able to get through everything prior to the regular City Council meeting and asked if they
wanted to reconvene following that meeting or bring it back to a future meeting.
Councilmember Callies suggested that they see how far they can get in their discussions and
make the decision then.
Councilmember Zerby stated that he agreed and would like to see how much they can hammer
out.
Mayor Labadie suggested that they start their discussion with the ‘easy’ items such as whether
or not the Council feels the Commissioner presentations are beneficial. She noted that personally
she felt that they were beneficial for a variety of reasons.
CITY OF SHOREWOOD WORK SESSION COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
SEPTEMBER 25, 2023
Page 6 of 10
Councilmember Zerby stated that he also feels the Commissioner presentations are worthwhile
and were a good way for the Commissions to stay in touch with the Council and vice versa. He
stated that he also likes the human factor rather than just reading through the minutes to see what
was said.
Councilmember Sanschagrin suggested that they add more purpose to it and perhaps they could
also use that time to pose questions to the Council in order to give more guidance.
Councilmember Callies stated that she thinks that would be something that would be better put
on the agenda for discussion rather than having a back and forth discussion during their
presentation.
Councilmember Zerby noted that the Council already has the option to add or pull things from the
agenda prior to their making a motion and voting on its acceptance.
Councilmember Callies stated that she agreed and did not feel the public should be able to pull
items from the Consent Agenda. She suggested that rather than labeling it ‘Reports and
Presentations’ there should be room for a Councilmember to say that they think something should
be placed on the agenda in the future.
Mayor Labadie stated that she believes that there should be a majority of Councilmembers in
agreement that the topic should be brought forward onto a future agenda. She expressed concern
that a time limit may be appropriate for this because she did not want it to turn into a grandstand
type of situation where there are twenty angry people in the audience with the expectation that
they will be able to speak.
Councilmember Zerby stated that he believes that was what Matters from the Floor was designed
for and noted that a Councilmember could decide to take these things forward during their report
time and bring it back for a future agenda item.
Councilmember Maddy noted that the Council has every liberty to put whatever they like onto the
agenda at the beginning of the meeting if there is a majority who vote in favor of it. He stated that
this would just not give staff prep time and explained that he was comfortable with either approach.
Mayor Labadie explained that the past practice has been that the Council cannot bring up items
on the spot, but can approach the City Administrator with a concern and it is discussed with staff
at their weekly meeting.
City Attorney Shepherd noted that he feels the question is whether or not the Council wants to
have something on the agenda that is more communicative that there may be a bit of a discussion
under the Council reports versus what they currently have. He stated that they could just truly
label it ‘Council Reports and Discussion’ which will give the community a heads up that there may
be some chatter.
Mayor Labadie noted that the Council still needs to discuss Council policies/bylaws and interactive
technology and suggested that they recess this meeting and reconvene following the regular City
Council meeting.
Zerby moved, Maddy seconded, recessing the City Council Work Session at 6:55 p.m. and
reconvene following the Regular City Council meeting. Motion passed 5/0.
CITY OF SHOREWOOD WORK SESSION COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
SEPTEMBER 25, 2023
Page 7 of 10
Zerby moved, Sanschagrin seconded, reconvening the City Council Work Session at 9:30
p.m. Motion passed 5/0.
Mayor Labadie suggested that they begin with discussion on Council Policies or Bylaws.
City Administrator Nevinski stated that this may be a good place for them to put their practices
down on paper, for example, how they handle Matters from the Floor, getting items on the agenda,
and perhaps a modified version of Robert’s Rules of Order. He offered to do a bit more research
and see what may be included, but it is was not something the Council was interested he did not
need to spend any time looking into it.
Councilmember Sanschagrin asked if Excelsior has this.
City Administrator Nevinski explained that Excelsior has, in their ordinance, Bylaws, for how the
Council functions. He stated that some cities have bylaws, some have policies, and some do not
have anything. He stated that currently the City is in the third bucket where they do not really
seem to have anything.
Mayor Labadie stated that she did not think it was a bad idea and shared the example of when
she first took office and made a few changes that mirrored what other cities were doing. She
explained that some of those decisions led to her essentially being crucified by residents who felt
those changes were not democratic. She stated that she feels having written policies would have
helped in that situation and noted that she felt the Council should continue to use Robert’s Rules
of Order as a loose guide.
City Attorney Shepherd noted that he believes that City Administrator Nevinski was making
reference to the League of Minnesota Cities Mayor’s handbook that has a modified Robert’s Rules
of Order that could be incorporated into the Council policies/bylaws.
Mayor Labadie stated that she feels using the League of Minnesota Cities guidance was an
excellent idea.
Councilmember Callies stated that she felt it was a good idea to have some policies, but
expressed concern that they can end up being taken as a literal ‘law’ and used as a criticism. She
stated that she was concerned about it being over regulated and questioned what actual things
would be included in the policies.
Councilmember Zerby agreed that a good place to start would be the League of Minnesota Cities.
He noted that in looking over the bylaws from Excelsior, they have to have training within the first
fifteen days of being elected, which he feels may be a bit too much in the weeds. He stated that
he would like to just see it be something at a bit of a higher level and provide some framework
without reinventing the wheel.
Councilmember Maddy suggested calling it a framework rather than a policy so it is seen as more
of a guideline.
There was consensus of the Council to create guidelines that outlined the general Council
policies.
CITY OF SHOREWOOD WORK SESSION COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
SEPTEMBER 25, 2023
Page 8 of 10
There was discussion about the Council and all Commissions following the same type of way to
run a meeting/making motions.
Mayor Labadie moved the discussion onto the topic of interactive technology. She expressed the
stressful feelings that happen when the technology was not working correctly and expressed
sympathy for the stress it places on City staff who are not trained IT professionals. She stated
that she feels this is an unfair burden to place on Planning Director Darling or City Clerk/HR
Director Thone or other staff members.
City Clerk/HR Director Thone explained that there are four interactives that staff are trying to work
out when they are running a Zoom meeting and gave an overview of the things she has to manage
as part of that process. She shared examples of what had happened at the earlier Regular City
Council meeting and gave an overview of the limitations. She stated that there is a lot of multi-
tasking required and agreed that it is very stressful. She stated that it is not necessarily Zoom that
creates the stress and is more the idea of one person being able to do all these things and also
be able to be an active participant in the meeting, which she stated is nearly impossible to do well.
Councilmember Zerby stated that he feels technology has always been a challenge for the City.
He noted that he was not sure that the City could ditch Zoom without facing the ‘Wrath of Khan’.
Councilmember Callies noted that most Council meetings also have some type of professional
person that shows up to participate in the meeting via Zoom.
Mayor Labadie stated that she agrees with everything that has been stated and noted that even
the discussion of removing Zoom was weaponized against the Council as being undemocratic.
She stated that there are very few cities that are similar in size to Shorewood that have maintained
the interactive Zoom component and those that do have a staff member that is dedicated to that.
She stated that she believes it is unfair to put this stress on staff when it is not something in their
title or job duties. She noted that it has provided a very useful tool for things like off-site presenters
and she is at a loss for how to proceed because she feels that the way it was currently being done
was not working and at the very least, needs to be modified. She shared her feelings of frustration
from the regular meeting, when parties on Zoom were holding up signs and waving their hands in
an attempt to communicate with the Council that the audio was not working.
Councilmember Sanschagrin stated that he would agree that it is not working the way it is being
implemented right now but felt it was an important tool and did not want the City to turn their backs
on it as an option. He stated that the best approach may be to have someone come in that is
technology oriented.
Mayor Labadie noted that these duty would not currently be included in any of the job titles.
City Clerk/HR Director Thone noted that she understands the technology enough to perform it,
but cannot set it up to be successful in five minutes time, Zoom does not interact with the presenter
tool, which renders you incapable of running the Zoom meeting for that period of time, and when
performing all of those tasks, as a participating staff member, it is highly distracting and difficult
to pay attention to the actual meeting. She suggested that it may be possible if they split up the
duties.
Councilmember Maddy stated that the LMCC is currently going through somewhat of an identity
crisis due to their funding mechanism and suggested that they ask if they can work towards some
CITY OF SHOREWOOD WORK SESSION COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
SEPTEMBER 25, 2023
Page 9 of 10
type of media services function. He suggested that perhaps they could send one person to record
and another to manage the Zoom technology.
Councilmember Zerby agreed that may be a good talent pool to ask to fill that need.
City Administrator Nevinski stated that he thinks the City learned a valuable lesson tonight in
trying to put everything on City Clerk/HR Director Thone and that there would be value in having
another individual involved. He stated that he agrees with the sentiment that there is a lot of value
in Zoom and believes the City can take a look at some other options with staff members or LMCC.
Councilmember Callies suggested that they may also want to look into creating some Zoom
etiquette policies. She stated any approach they use whether it is with staff or LMCC will become
a budgetary issue.
Councilmember Sanschagrin stated that he feels the City needs to have one person dedicated to
handling the Zoom aspect of the meetings and nothing else.
Mayor Labadie suggested that they explore the option, if people want to use Zoom, that their
cameras are turned on. She referenced past instances where she felt Zoom was used as a way
for people to say things that she did not feel they would have said if they were standing in front of
the Council. She apologized to City Clerk/HR Director Thone for not having the earlier Work
Session meeting have a hard stop at 6:45 p.m., as requested, in order to give her time to
adequately set up the Zoom features.
Councilmember Zerby noted that he was not sure that they would be able to enforce the
requirement to have their camera turned on.
Mayor Labadie clarified that she meant that their camera would have to be turned on while they
were speaking similar to how people have to come to the podium and state their name and
address.
Councilmember Zerby shared examples where people could say that they did not have enough
money for a web camera or had a medical condition.
Mayor Labadie stated that it appears as though the Council was in agreement that if they can
make this work efficiently that they do not mind the concept of interactive technology and that an
outside person, beyond a staff member, should handle these duties. She asked staff to check
into the suggestion of utilizing LMCC and their talent pool and report back on the associated costs
including possible staff options.
Councilmember Maddy asked if staff was asked to stay late if they were paid overtime.
City Administrator Nevinski explained that much of staff is salaried so there would not be overtime
but noted that there are some staff members who are hourly so there could end up being an
overtime or comp time issues. He suggested that they take a look in more depth and lay out some
options for Council consideration.
The Council discussed Council participation via Zoom with a medical condition.
4. ADJOURN
CITY OF SHOREWOOD WORK SESSION COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
SEPTEMBER 25, 2023
Page 10 of 10
Maddy moved, Zerby seconded, Adjourning the City Council Work Session Meeting of May
8, 2023, at 10:09 P.M. Motion passed 5/0.
ATTEST:
Jennifer Labadie, Mayor
Sandie Thone, City Clerk
2B
CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING COUNCIL CHAMBERS
MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 25, 2023 7:00 P.M.
MINUTES
1. CONVENE CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
Mayor Labadie called the meeting to order at 7:01 P.M.
A. Pledge of Allegiance
B. Roll Call
Present. Mayor Labadie; Councilmembers Callies, Maddy, Sanschagrin, and Zerby; City
Attorney Shepherd; City Administrator Nevinski; City Clerk/HR Director Thone;
Finance Director Rigdon; Director of Public Works Morreim; Park and Recreation
Director Crossfield; City Engineer Budde; and Communications and Recycling
Coordinator Wilson
Absent: None
C. Review Agenda
The Council discussed the feedback that had been received regarding portions of the agenda that
were not available on-line.
City Administrator Nevinski noted that the full agenda was available under the ‘packet’ tab.
Mayor Labadie noted that she just saw a note on the Zoom feed that stated that the audio was
not working.
There was a brief pause to allow staff time to address the technical issues.
Zerby moved, Maddy seconded, approving the agenda, as presented.
Motion passed, 5-0.
2. CONSENT AGENDA
Mayor Labadie reviewed the items on the Consent Agenda.
Sanschagrin moved, Callies seconded, Approving the Motions Contained on the Consent
Agenda and Adopting the Resolutions Therein.
A. City Council Work Session Minutes of September 11, 2023
B. City Council Regular Meeting Minutes of September 11, 2023
C. Approval of the Verified Claims List
CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
SEPTEMBER 25, 2023
Page 2 of 14
D. Approve Public Works Custodial Services Agreement
E. Approve SCEC Custodial Services Agreement
F. Accept Donation for Oktoberfest 2023, Adopting RESOLUTION NO. 23-099,
“A Resolution Accepting Donation to the City of Shorewood 2023.”
G. Personnel Policy Updates, Adopting RESOLUTION NO. 23-096, “A
Resolution Approving Shorewood Employee Personnel/Employee
Handbook Updates.”
H. Approve Right of Entry Agreement with Arvig
I. Authorize Execution of Hennepin County Regional Rail Authority Permit
(HCRRA) For Freeman Park Trail Improvements
Motion passed, 5-0.
3. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR
John Hasselbach, 26350 Peach Circle, explained that they have some concerns about the cut
that was made in the woods from Strawberry Lane to the stormwater ponds. He read aloud a
letter that he had submitted to City Administrator Nevinski that outlined his concerns about
unrestricted access to their property because of this cut. He explained that all of the neighbors
agree that this is a problem and were asking the City to provide a solution that delineates public
property from private property, such as split rail fencing and some signage.
Mayor Labadie stated that her understanding was that staff would be working on this issue with
Mr. Hasselbach.
Nancy Westman, 19515 Vine Ridge Road, expressed concern about what she feels is enormous
debt for the City. She stated that she wanted to urge the Council and staff to address the current
debt before they make a move to expand the budget. She noted that before her taxes were raised,
she would like to see a transparent discussion been the City departments, staff and Council, that
can be shared with the residents so they can be part of the decision making process. She shared
examples of specific concerns that had been brought to her by her neighbors related to things
like, requests for additional staffing, excessive education travel expenses, potential pay increases
without performance benchmarks, excessive/oversized projects, and hiring a consulting firm to
serve as City Engineer. She clarified that she was asking for greater transparency as well as ease
of access to budget details, and participation in ongoing conversations between staff and the
Council on how they will address the debt. She noted that she would like the City to hire their own
engineer and not utilize the services of a consulting firm.
Mayor Labadie noted that the City holds extensive budget discussions including some during work
session meetings. She stated that all of these meetings are noticed and are open to the public.
She noted that residents could also contact members of the Council or staff if there are specific
items they would like to discuss.
CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
SEPTEMBER 25, 2023
Page 3 of 14
Debbie Siakel, 25680 Birch Bluff Road, expressed her appreciation to Council and staff for the
beautiful job they are doing on Birch Bluff Road. She noted that she understands that the Council
was following a process and doing their job as an elected body. She stated that this will provide
benefit to residents long after they are gone and noted that the utility improvements have been
huge. She admitted that there had been some errors that have happened as part of the building
process, but also noted that this project means that they will have curb and gutter installed. She
noted that she has lived here for over thirty years and in that time there has not been any
significant road improvement projects done and feels what is being done is a vast improvement
and will provide huge improvement for drainage in the area. She stated that City Engineer Budde
has been out to the site and answered questions that have arisen. She stated she would also like
to respond to comments made by Ms. Westman and noted that she wholeheartedly disagreed
with her statement. She stated that she had served on the City Council for twelve years and would
agree that others, before Ms. Westman, had raise similar concerns, but noted that she feels the
City’s financial management has been top notch. She explained that many other cities do not ask
residents to give input on road projects and instead come in, do the project, and then ask the
residents how they want to pay the city for doing the work. She stated that the idea that the City
does not listen to residents is, in her opinion, malarkey.
Rich Siakel, 25680 Birch Bluff Road, stated that he had attended the open house meeting on the
improvements planned for Eureka Road. He stated that Eureka Road has been in a state of
severe disrepair for quite some time and explained that the traffic for vehicles and pedestrians in
the area has greatly increased. He stated that there are people traveling through this area to get
to the trail and feels that anybody who says that traffic is not increasing is simply a misnomer. He
stated that he understands the City has a choice between two projects and noted that the impact
to residents will be minimal and will all be done on City property with the existing easements,
which is not the City ‘taking’ their land. He explained that he would support the choice for the
larger improvement with the six foot wide trail/sidewalk.
Alan Yelsey, asked if the Council was planning to proceed with a vote even though residents did
not receive a copy of the full agenda.
City Administrator Nevinski reiterated his statement from earlier in the meeting that the agenda
tab was missing some pages from agenda, however, the full agenda was available under the
‘packet’ tab and noted that the agenda was also posted here at City Hall.
Mr. Yelsey thanked the City for hosting the open house meeting last week. He expressed concern
about the City’s processes related to the budget and explained that he did not feel it allowed the
opportunity for the residents to talk and review the budget items with the Council, which he feels
is not democratic. He stated that he was not aware the Council was planning to vote on the budget
tonight and was not interested in reading the long, large agenda available on the website. He
explained that he felt the City was taking every non-democratic step possible, to allow them to do
whatever they wanted to without resident input. He noted that he had not seen the most recent
version of the budget that was presented at a Council Work Session in August and feels what
they are doing is intolerable. He requested that the Council stop, wait, and have an open
discussion with the residents about the budget. He stated that he agreed with the concerns raised
by Ms. Westman regarding the budget and those raised Mr. Hasselbach regarding property rights.
He asked City Attorney Shepherd to provide him with the legal opinion on why the City is not
accountable to follow the tree preservation and replacement policy with regard to the cut through
and why restoration was not being practiced. He clarified that he would like a formal legal opinion
on this matter that he can share with the citizenry. He stated that he would also like to formally
CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
SEPTEMBER 25, 2023
Page 4 of 14
request that the City allow a number of residents to hire a third party, a University of Minnesota
civil engineer to evaluate the $25 million in projects being conducted in the City, to let them know
if their money has been well spent.
Mayor Labadie noted that Mr. Yelsey had exceeded his three minutes and asked him to wrap up
his comments.
Mr. Yelsey stated that he did not need additional time.
Mayor Labadie explained that City Attorney Shepherd was present tonight and has heard the
concerns raised by Mr. Yelsey.
Mr. Yelsey asked if he would be receiving communication from City Attorney Shepherd.
City Attorney Shepherd explained that if the Council would like him to research or respond to an
issue they can ask and clarified that he did not take direction from residents, but from the Council
or City staff.
Mr. Yelsey clarified that he was told by City Administrator Nevinski that the City was not subject
to the tree preservation policy and he was just looking for the written policy that showed the City
was not accountable to it.
Mayor Labadie stated that if the Council directed City Attorney Shepherd to respond to this item,
Mr. Yelsey would be informed.
4. REPORTS AND PRESENTATIONS
A. 2023 Tree Sales Update
Eric Wilson, Communications and Recycling Coordinator, noted that the 2023 Tree Sale had been
completed with 126 trees delivered. He reviewed some of the survey responses from those who
purchased trees.
Councilmember Sanschagrin stated that he feels this is a great program but noted that one of the
comments he has gotten from residents is that there could be additional thought given to selection
of the trees that are best for the environment, for example, more likely to survive in local
conditions. He noted that he had been informed that, for example, maple trees are ones to avoid
planting due to various diseases.
5. PARKS
A. Parks Commission Update
Park Commissioner Garske gave an overview of recent Park Commission discussions and
actions as outlined in the meeting minutes. He encouraged residents to come out over the
weekend to the various Oktoberfest activities at Badger Park.
B. Emerald Ash Borer Treatments
CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
SEPTEMBER 25, 2023
Page 5 of 14
Public Works Director Morreim reviewed details of the Integrated Pest Management workplan and
potential injection treatments in City parks for the emerald ash borer. He noted that the chemical
recommended for this treatment is called TREE-age R10 which would be applied in a targeted
manner by Davey Tree. He reviewed the general cost parameters for this application and
treatment and noted that this week is the last week that injections can be done and explained that
if the Council decides not to do this right now, it will have to wait until next year. He noted that if it
is approved, they will do injections on trees located in Cathcart, Manor, and Silverwood that would
happen this week and next year the trees at Freeman Park would be due for their three year
rotation of treatment. He reviewed the three options for Council consideration including: no
injections; injecting high priority trees on a three year cycle; injecting low and high priority trees
on a three year cycle. He explained that staff recommends the option where high priority trees
would be injected every three years as a way to prolong the life of the ash trees and allow the
City time to plant new trees to replace these when they are removed. He reviewed the budget
considerations and explained that the funds would come out of the Park Maintenance budget.
Councilmember Sanschagrin asked about the history of disease within City parks and if there
have been a lot of issues.
Public Works Director Morreim stated that they do have some ‘dying’ ash trees and explained that
the emerald ash borer has been found in the City. He stated that the prominent trees in the City
were inspected a few months ago and were found to be good candidates for it.
Councilmember Sanschagrin asked for a percentage of the amount of trees in the City are ash
trees.
Public Works Director Morreim explained that it varies and, for example, the high priorities areas
of Freeman Park probably have forty to sixty percent ash trees and within the other City parks it
is probably around forty to fifty percent ash trees.
Councilmember Sanschagrin noted that the more he learns about the treatment, the less
favorable he believes they are for the City because it is not a permanent solution. He explained
that he also had concerns about the cost and feels this money would be better spent simply
planting new trees. He stated that he would like to get the new trees in place so the City can
remove the ash trees as they become sick. He reiterated that he would be in favor of not doing
any injections and saving those funds for other purposes, such as planting trees.
Councilmember Callies stated that she was in favor of the option recommended by staff and noted
that the Council had just discussed the budget and had eliminated some of the expense
associated with replacement of trees because of the cost. She stated that she thinks they are
discussing the more prominent trees and noted that the more she learns about the treatment, the
more she is in support of this treatment, despite the fact that it is not a ‘permanent’ solution. She
stated that a frequent message they hear from the citizens is concern about elimination of trees
within the City and she believes treating these prominent trees is a useful expenditure.
Mayor Labadie asked about the specimen trees in the City parks and whether they provide a large
amount of shade.
Public Works Director Morreim stated that they do and noted that in Cathcart they are in the
middle of the playground, at Freeman, most of the trees near the baseball fields on the south and
around the playground are ash.
CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
SEPTEMBER 25, 2023
Page 6 of 14
Councilmember Zerby mentioned the Urban Forest Management Plan that was approved in 2016
and noted at that time, it said that there were five-hundred and sixty-seven ash trees located on
City property. He asked if this proposal was in alignment with the Urban Forest Management Plan.
Public Works Director Morreim explained that the Urban Forest Management Plan allowed for a
lot of removal of the ash trees and to his knowledge, most of that has not happened, unless they
died. He noted that the City has applied for a DNR grant that would update the Urban Forest
Management Plan and the City’s tree inventory and reiterated that there had not yet been any
coordinated removal of trees that was called for within the Urban Forest Management Plan.
Councilmember Zerby stated that he believed the idea behind the Urban Forest Management
Plan was to start getting rid of the ash trees and start replacing them with other varieties.
Public Works Director Morreim referenced Manor Park who has had a lot of trees planted there
and noted that the idea is to sort of replicate what has been done there throughout the City.
Councilmember Callies asked Councilmember Zerby to explain what he was referring to since
she was not on the Council in 2016.
Councilmember Zerby explained that the City had inventoried all the trees on City property and
the idea then was that the Emerald Ash Borers were coming and the City needed to work to
diversify the types of trees in the City. He stated that the determination was that the City should
basically start weeding out the ones that were less significant or at risk of disease and replace
them sooner, rather than later. He stated that he wants to make sure the City has a plan moving
forward because right now they are just talking about a few trees in the parks, but there are
hundreds of trees located throughout the City.
Public Works Director Morreim noted that regardless of whether or not the City receives grant
funding for updating the Urban Forest Management Plan, staff will be coming back to the Council
with a tree planting plan, it just may be on a smaller scale.
Councilmember Sanschagrin stated that he believes it makes sense to talk about planting and
asked about the costs associated with planting a more mature tree rather than just a sapling.
Public Works Director Morreim stated that there would be a significant difference in cost.
Councilmember Sanschagrin suggested that the City could plant the more mature trees in this
prominent locations even though it would be a bit more expensive rather than spending the money
to treat the trees that will ultimately die would be a way of investing in the future.
Public Works Director Morreim explained that the plan is to plant mature trees with the proposed
funds, but noted to get to the point where they are the size of the trees in Freeman Park will be
twenty to thirty years. He noted that the plan is not simply to cut the trees down because they are
ash trees but explained that the injections were a way to extend the useful life of those trees.
Councilmember Callies asked about the cost of cutting down one of the large trees.
CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
SEPTEMBER 25, 2023
Page 7 of 14
Public Works Director Morreim stated that there are many things that factor into the cost such as
location and utilities, but it can cost between three and six thousand dollars for a single tree to be
taken down.
Councilmember Callies stated that she felt another reason to move forward with these treatments
would be to space out the cost of having to take down these trees.
Mayor Labadie reviewed the options laid out by staff and asked for Council input.
Callies moved, Maddy seconded, Approving Option Two for Emerald Ash Borer injections
in 2023 and 2024, as presented.
Councilmember Zerby asked what treatment would be used and noted that he understands some
are better for the bees than others.
Public Works Director Morreim reiterated that the plan would be to use the TREE-age R10
chemical and noted that there are two other treatments that are part of the IPM recommendations
which would be releasing wasps in the targeted areas which has to be coordinated with the DNR
because there are no contractors that really do it so they would be on their own and the other
treatment is a chemical that is sourced out of Canada that has no known contractors in the Metro
area and would need to be done annually. He explained that this was why staff was
recommending the option of using the TREE-age R10 chemical and clarified that if those
injections are done safely and effectively, it will have minimal effects on bees and other insects.
Councilmember Zerby stated that he has seen this chemical called Tree-azin and asked if it would
be used.
Public Works Director Morreim stated that it is called TREE-age, but noted that there were some
ellipsis’ that he was not sure how to type within his report, but noted the chemicals were the same
thing.
Councilmember Zerby stated that he believed that they were two different products.
Public Works Director Morreim explained that it is possible that the active ingredient name may
have a different brand name.
Councilmember Zerby explained that he would be in favor of treating them as long as they use
the least toxic approach for the bees.
Public Works Director Morreim explained that the option he is recommending would not be the
least toxic approach and noted that the other two options he reviewed would be.
Councilmember Zerby stated that he was not referring to the wasp treatment, but rather the least
toxic chemical treatment option.
Public Works Director Morreim noted that option would be an annual treatment and right now he
would have no idea of what that cost would be.
Councilmember Maddy stated that he supported the motion on the table but explained that he
did not like the idea of poisoning trees. He stated that follows their earlier discussion about the
CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
SEPTEMBER 25, 2023
Page 8 of 14
cost and the liability the City has for all the standing trees that will eventually have to go away is
substantial and this action just pushes it out a few more years. He stated that he is very interested
in what the City will do to begin planting and noted that he believes that the City will eventually
move to Option One as they are replaced by a more diverse urban canopy.
City Administrator Nevinski noted that it appears as though there are two different chemical
products and read aloud their full names. He stated that what he recalls from the IPM report these
chemicals were discussed. He explained that as he looks at the Bee Safe resolution that was
updated last year, one of the goals was to gradually reduce the use of these chemicals. He stated
that what he feels has been brought forward is a plan to target key trees and not a plan to deal
with all of the ash trees within the City.
Public Works Director Morreim noted that TREE-age is the chemical that was also used two years
ago.
Councilmember Sanschagrin explained that he would be voting against this because he would
like to reallocate these funds for future tree planting of mature trees.
Motion passed 3/2 (Sanschagrin and Zerby opposed).
6. PLANNING
A. Planning Commission Update
Planning Commissioner Gorham gave an overview of the recent Planning Commission meeting,
as reflected in the minutes.
7. ENGINEERING/PUBLIC WORKS
8. GENERAL/NEW BUSINESS
A. 2024 Preliminary Budget and Levy
Finance Director Rigdon gave an overview of the past meetings and discussion surrounding the
proposed 2024 Preliminary Budget and Levy. He explained that in its current form it shows about
a 9.3% increase over the 2023 budget. He gave a brief overview of the personnel-related
assumptions within the budget and the General Fund revenues/expenditures. He reminded the
Council that they were not being asked to approve a final budget tonight and would basically set
a maximum budget and levy amount. He explained that the final budget and levy would be
adopted in December and can decrease from what is approved tonight, but cannot be increased.
He reviewed the taxable market value, tax capacity, the proposed property tax levy and shared
examples of how that would affect tax payers based on the valuation of their home. He explained
that this resolution must be submitted to the County by September 30, 2023 and reiterated that
the Council could choose to decrease the budget and levy, but cannot increase it after this this
approved tonight.
Mayor Labadie thanked Finance Director Rigdon for his work on the budget and levy. She
explained that the Council had a Work Session on August 14, 2023 and on September 11, 2023
where they discussed the budget and levy in great detail. She stated that the Council had thrown
CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
SEPTEMBER 25, 2023
Page 9 of 14
a lot of ideas at staff and noted that all of these meetings were open to the public and she felt
they involved very fruitful discussions.
Councilmember Sanschagrin stated that he would agree that a lot of work has gone into the
budget and appreciates the work that has been done by staff. He explained that he had one more
suggestion of a place that the City could cut their budget a bit more. He noted that the City usually
budgets about $100,000 for legal fees, but historically only uses about $85,000. He suggested
that the City make this change and use the difference as either a reduction in the levy or reallocate
it to something like Public Works for investment in trees or parks.
Councilmember Zerby asked City Clerk/HR Thone how much a tobacco license costs.
City Clerk/HR Director Thone stated that a tobacco license is two-hundred fifty dollars and noted
that the City had five licensees within the City.
Councilmember Zerby stated that he believed it was only shown as a revenue of five hundred
dollars in the budget so that should be changed to reflect the accurate number.
Councilmember Callies noted that just because something was in the budget did not mean that
the City had to actually spend the money. She explained that things like legal fees can be a bit
unpredictable and asked City Administrator Nevinski to weigh in on the idea of Councilmember
Sanschagrin’s proposed change to legal fees.
City Administrator Nevinski stated that if the Council wanted to move some funds around, this
would be a good time to do it.
Mayor Labadie explained that she was opposed to reducing legal fees because it was not a fee
that the City ‘must’ spend.
Councilmember Sanschagrin stated that he thought the City was insured against parties litigating
against the City. He stated that he felt the legal costs were more about administration of the code
and having the attorney available.
City Administrator Nevinski explained that part of their insurance does cover legal fees and, in
some cases, settlements. He noted that there are deductibles that need to be paid in some
situations.
Councilmember Sanschagrin asked how much the City’s deductible was.
Finance Director Rigdon stated that he believed the deductible was five-thousand dollars.
Councilmember Zerby asked if there was more travel anticipated for this year than there was last
year.
City Administrator Nevinski stated that he was not sure that there was a lot more travel anticipated
but noted that they wanted to make sure that the City is investing in staff in terms of professional
development. He noted that people are once again starting to gather back together again, but the
pandemic did demonstrate some areas of efficiency with on-line options.
CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
SEPTEMBER 25, 2023
Page 10 of 14
Councilmember Zerby noted that the City has spent less than four-thousand dollars for the last
six years on training and travel but have budgeted eight-thousand-five hundred dollars for 2024.
He noted that amount would double what it has been over the last six years. He stated that absent
any planned travel, he thinks the City could trim a bit from that area of the budget but clarified that
he did not want to affect employee morale or their opportunities to travel.
City Administrator Nevinski stated that he believed this line item also included money for
fireworks.
City Clerk/HR Director Thone stated that the fireworks was included in the City Council budget.
City Administrator Nevinski noted that he would have to go back and look through the details.
Councilmember Zerby noted that he feels in some areas the City just has a cut and paste
approach to moving things year to year and reiterated that the actual use was significantly less
than what was budgeted.
City Administrator Nevinski noted that he believed this encompassed the entire training and travel
budget for the Administration department. He cautioned that for the last few years there has not
been a whole lot of training or travel for education and conferences due to the pandemic.
City Clerk/HR Director Thone explained that this line item also funds the City’s education
reimbursement program which is up to three-thousand dollars per employee. She noted that this
budget item encompasses all the training and education for the entire administration and finance
department staff. She agreed that they did not use much of it over the last few years, for several
reasons including the pandemic, but staff feels the proposed amount is a fair and adequate budget
to cover the expenses and employees included within it.
City Administrator Nevinski stated that this is the preliminary budget and levy and the City had
also set the Truth in Taxation hearing for December 11, 2023, 7:00 p.m. at City Hall which would
be when the Council sets the final budget. He reiterated the point made earlier by Finance Director
Rigdon that what is approved tonight can be decreased at that time, but cannot go any higher
than its current amount.
Councilmember Zerby noted that this information is listed on the City website under ‘City News’
and includes the timeline and dates for discussion and lists what action the Council would take.
He expressed his appreciation to staff for their work to make a bit of a dent in the numbers.
Zerby moved, Maddy seconded, Adopting RESOLUTION NO. 23-097, “A Resolution
Adopting the Preliminary 2024 General Fund Operating Budget and Property Tax Levy.”
Motion passed, 5-0.
B. Website Proposals and Recommendations – CivicPlus Presentation
Staff resolved an audio/video interruption to the Zoom component of the meeting.
Communications and Recycling Coordinator Wilson explained that the City’s current contract with
Revize will terminate in March of 2024. He noted that staff took a look at what they felt were the
strength and weaknesses of the existing website and also reviewed various other providers to
CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
SEPTEMBER 25, 2023
Page 11 of 14
explore options for updating the City’s website. He stated that after much consideration, staff was
recommending that the City contract with CivicPlus and introduced Mr. Wheeler and Mr. Ortega
of CivicPlus.
Mr. Wheeler and Mr. Ortega of CivicPlus gave a brief presentation on their company and what
the City can expect from using CivicPlus and their platform. They shared examples of other city
websites they have been involved with including Woodbury, Golden Valley, and St. Pete Beach.
Communications and Recycling Coordinator Wilson explained that staff was asking for Council
authorization to begin working to update the City’s website with CivicPlus which will be about a
five to six month long process and would allow the new website to be ready to launch by March
of 2024.
City Administrator Nevinski explained that staff would come back to the Council at a future
meeting with an actual contract for these services.
Councilmember Maddy asked how the pricing was developed for this and asked if the pricing was
determined by population or per whatever modules they choose.
Mr. Ortega explained that the pricing was population based and noted that they take care of all of
the hosting, security, and maintenance. He noted that one of the things that he feels is a big
differentiator between CivicPlus and others is that for every four years of continuous service, the
City will receive a completely refreshed website.
Mayor Labadie asked Councilmember Zerby for his input based on his experience in this field.
Councilmember Zerby stated that he and Communications and Recycling Coordinator Wilson
have had conversations about some of the limitations of the City’s current website. He stated that
he felt this proposal was a good fit and believes CivicPlus has a lot to offer. He noted that they
appear to have possible cyber-attacks under control as well. He stated that he feels this is a
worthy endeavor and noted that the website is the number one way most of the residents initially
engage with the City.
Councilmember Sanschagrin noted that he had gone to some of the cities that have utilized
CivicPlus on his phone and found them to be quite mobile friendly.
Councilmember Callies noted that she had taken a look at some of the other options and asked
if the annual renewal cost for Granicus was correct because it seemed out of line with the others.
Communications and Recycling Coordinator Wilson stated that he checked with others that used
Granicus and they confirmed that the price point compared to others was significantly higher.
Councilmember Callies stated that the websites for the cities that use Granicus are quite user
friendly, but agreed that their price seemed pretty high.
Communications and Recycling Coordinator Wilson noted that with Granicus there was more
ability to do some design components in house, however, that also takes a lot more staff
knowledge and time to be able to do the work.
CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
SEPTEMBER 25, 2023
Page 12 of 14
Councilmember Callies noted that one of the advantages with CivicPlus is ease of registration for
activities, classes, and facilities management and stated that she thought the City had just bought
a software upgrades in order to do those things separately.
City Administrator Nevinski stated that they had purchased the CivicRec software to operate the
Park and Recreation facilities. He noted that he was not sure if there would be further integration
of those as part of this change or not.
Mr. Wheeler stated that CivicRec is a much more advanced platform and will be integrated with
the website which means the calendar can easily be shared and available within the portal. He
noted that there are other things within the CivicPlus ‘family’ that can be taken advantage of that
are along these same lines.
Councilmember Callies stated that this appears to be a duplicative service, but noted that relative
to the other proposals, the cost from CivicPlus is comparable.
City Administrator Nevinski stated that he believes the CivicRec module is more advanced than
what they would get with the website. He noted that the City had purchased that module a few
months ago because they really needed assistance in scheduling their usage but stated that as
things move forward they can evaluate if making a change would make sense.
Zerby moved, Sanschagrin seconded, to Accept the Proposal by CivicPlus and Authorize
Staff to begin the work to update the City’s website.
Motion passed, 5-0.
C. Approve Recruitment for LEO – Utility Lead Position
Public Works Director Morreim noted that included in his staff report was an overview of the duties
for this position in the Public Works Department and what has happened over the last few months.
He explained the reasons he was proposing to internally recruit for the Utility Lead position as a
promotion.
Councilmember Sanschagrin asked if this position would report to Public Works Director Morreim
or the Public Works Supervisor.
Public Works Director Morreim stated that this position would report to both of them.
Councilmember Sanschagrin suggested a word change on the second page of the essential
functions of the positions to say that this person must work well and communicate with others
‘especially’ during emergency situations. He asked what the plan would be for interviewing for
this position.
Public Works Director Morreim noted that he and City Clerk/HR Director Thone had not discussed
those specific details yet. He noted that he expects the two of them will meet over the next week
or so while the position is being advertised to determine the interview process.
Councilmember Callies stated that she thinks this is a really good idea and appreciates that Public
Works Director Morreim was looking out for his staff and allowing the opportunity for people to
advance internally.
CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
SEPTEMBER 25, 2023
Page 13 of 14
Callies moved, Labadie seconded, to Approve Internal Recruitment for the Utility Lead
position, as presented.
Motion passed, 5-0.
9. STAFF AND COUNCIL REPORTS
A. Staff
1. Newsletter Plan and Content Calendar
Communications and Recycling Coordinator Wilson explained that due to some changes with the
budget for the coming year, the Shore Report would be moving to a bi-monthly schedule. He
reviewed the proposed draft schedule and encouraged the Council to let him know if they have
ideas or comments.
2. Website and Social Media Stats Report
Communications and Recycling Coordinator Wilson reviewed some of the basic information
gathered related to the website, e-mails, and social media statistics since he has been with the
City.
Mayor Labadie noted that this is the first time the Council has gotten this kind of report and
explained that she found it very interesting to see how people were engaging and interacting with
the City.
Park and Recreation Director Crossfield stated that last week the City had students from Students
Achieve Independent Life (S.A.I.L) out doing park clean-up at Freeman and Badger Park. She
noted that it was a very busy weekend at the Shorewood Community and Event Center and
reviewed the various rentals which totaled thirty-seven hours and explained that staff all pitched
in and helped get everything done. She noted that, so far, they have 60 rentals scheduled for the
month of October. She encouraged everyone to remember the various Oktoberfest events that
will take place on September 30, 2023.
City Administrator Nevinski stated that he felt this past weekend demonstrated the need for the
City to have building attendants at the Shorewood Community and Event Center, because it put
a big tax on staff.
Public Works Director Morreim stated that last Thursday, the drought forecast was released and
the County was fully within the ‘severe drought’ category but noted that may change this week
because of the recent rain. He stated that the Public Works Department has been working on
crack filling and sealing which will be an ongoing/annual activity. He noted that he has gotten two
quotes for Buckthorn removal and hopes to bring a recommendation to the Council at an
upcoming meeting. He explained that the DNR grant that he had mentioned earlier in the meeting
is not a matching grant.
City Engineer Budde stated that they held the Open House on the Eureka Road project last week
which was well attended. He stated that the Freeman Park trail project is getting underway and
noted that they were doing a lot of the removal work and will pour concrete later this week. He
CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
SEPTEMBER 25, 2023
Page 14 of 14
stated that the Strawberry Lane and Birch Bluff projects were basically rained out today, but were
making good progress.
City Clerk/HR Director Thone expressed her appreciation for staff and volunteers who helped at
the recent shred event and noted that there were about seventy cars that participated. She
explained that on October 26th they will participate in the Minnetonka High School Fall Volunteer
Event, which is similar to a job fair for high school students, to recruit for various city opportunities
available including student election judges for the 2024 election season. She stated that she
specifically wanted to thank Communications and Recycling Coordinator Wilson for the time and
energy he put into securing a new website proposal for the city and for his work on the projects
he reported on this evening.
City Administrator Nevinski reminded the Council that their next meeting would be held on
Tuesday, October 10, 2023 because of Columbus Day. He stated that there will be an upcoming
EDA meeting and also a Park Commissioner interview.
B. Mayor and City Council
Councilmember Maddy noted that October 5, 2023 the Excelsior Fire District will hold an Open
House beginning at 5:30 p.m.
Councilmember Callies stated that she planned to attend the Excelsior Fire District Open House
and noted that her husband would be there cooking hot dogs.
Mayor Labadie noted that all five members of the Council were in attendance at the Eureka Road
Open House and expressed her appreciation to City Engineer Budde and all the various staff
members who were on hand that evening as well.
10. ADJOURN
Sanschagrin moved, Maddy seconded, Adjourning the City Council Regular Meeting of
September 25, 2023, at 9:28 P.M.
Motion passed, 5-0.
ATTEST:
Jennifer Labadie, Mayor
Sandie Thone, City Clerk
Item
2D
City Council Meeting Item
Title/Subject: LMCIT Insurance Renewal
Meeting Date: October 10, 2023
Prepared by: Marc Nevinski, City Administrator
Attachments: Liability Coverage Wavier Form
Background
The City Council is required by the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust (LMCIT) to
annually decide if they wish to waive or not waive the monetary limits on municipal tort liability
insurance established by Minnesota Statute 466.04. The current statutory liability limits are
$500,000 per claimant and $1,500,000 per occurrence. The City Council must also make a
separate decision whether or not to purchase additional liability insurance from LMCIT.
The City Council can do the following:
1. Not waive the statutory tort limits.
2. Waive the statutory limits and not purchase excess liability insurance coverage.
3. Waive the statutory limits and purchase excess liability insurance coverage.
Staff recommends the Council not waive statutory tort limits. See attached form that will be
sent to LMCIT upon the City Council approving this recommendation.
Financial Considerations
Traditionally the city has not waived liability limits and purchased additional liability insurance.
The proposed 2024 budget includes an amount for additional liability insurance.
Action Requested
Motion to waive the statutory tort limits and purchase excess liability insurance coverage.
A simple majority vote by the Council is required.
Mission Statement: The City of Shorewood is committed to providing residents quality public
services, a healthy environment, a variety of attractive amenities, a sustainable tax base, and
sound financial management through effective, efficient, and visionary leadership. Page 1
Item
2E
City Council Meeting Item
Title/Subject: Annual Retail Tobacco License Renewals
Meeting Date: October 10, 2023
Prepared by: Sandie Thone, City Clerk/Human Resources Director
Reviewed by: Marc Nevinski, City Administrator
Brenda Pricco, Deputy City Clerk
Attachments: Resolution 23-098
Background: Pursuant to Section 302 (Sale of Tobacco) of the Shorewood City Code and the
Shorewood Master Fee Schedule, retailers within the city limits who wish to sell tobacco
products are required to obtain a license from the city. Shorewood City Code provides that an
applicant completes an application and pays a licensing fee to be considered for a city retail
tobacco license. The annual renewal period for Tobacco licenses is November 1 through
October 31.
The following Shorewood Businesses have successfully submitted a complete application,
successfully passed a background investigation through South Lake Minnetonka Police
Department (SLMPD), paid the current annual tobacco license fee of $250 and are compliant
with all requirements for obtaining a tobacco renewal license and have agreed to abide by
Shorewood City Code Chapter 302 Sale of tobacco requirements. This section of code includes
providing access to the police department during regular business hours and an annual
compliance check.
Applicant Address
Cub Foods #1636 23800 State Highway 7
Holiday Stationstores, LLC 19955 State Highway 7
Lucky’s Station 24365 Smithtown Road
Shorewood Smoke Shop Plus 23710 State Highway 7
Jim’s Wine & Spirits 19905 State Highway 7
Shorewood Tobacco, Inc. 19905 State Highway 7
The MN Department of Health provides guidance for limited THC product sales. Low dose
(<0.3%) hemp derived THC sales are allowed in Shorewood and the City is not regulating sales.
THC products are available to those 21 years of age and older. Sales are limited to 5mg/serving
and 50mg/package. Products are required to be located behind the counter and locked. No
artificially derived ingredients are currently allowed except for Delta 8 and Delta 9. Violations
are reported to the MN Department of Health. Retailers of hemp derived THC are required to
be registered with the Minnesota Department of Health. Beginning in 2025, hemp derived THC
retailers will also need to obtain a license from the State Office of Cannabis Management and
register with the City.
Financial Considerations: The licensing fees collected as revenue offset the expense of issuing
the permits pursuant to Shorewood City Code Section 1301 (Municipal Fees).
Recommendation/Action Requested: Staff respectfully requests the city council approve
Resolution 23-098 License Renewals to the Businesses listed above to Sell Tobacco Products for
the period of November 1, 2023 through October 31, 2024. Motion, Second, and Simple
Majority required.
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 23-098
A RESOLUTION APPROVING ANNUAL RETAIL TOBACCO LICENSE RENEWALS
WHEREAS, Sections 302 of the Shorewood City Code provide for the licensing of the sale of
tobacco products in the city and requires all licensees comply with the code; and
WHEREAS, the Shorewood City Code provides that an applicant shall complete an application,
pay a licensing fee, and successfully pass a background investigation; and
WHEREAS, the following applicants have satisfactorily completed an application, paid the
appropriate fee, and passed a background investigation.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Shorewood as follows:
That a License for the sale of tobacco products be issued for a term commencing on
November 1, 2023 and expiring on October 31, 2024, consistent with the requirements
and provisions of Chapter 302 of the Shorewood City Code to the following applicants:
Applicant Address
Cub Foods #1636 23800 State Highway 7
Holiday Stationstores, LLC 19955 State Highway 7
Lucky’s Station 24365 Smithtown Road
Shorewood Smoke Shop Plus 23710 State Highway 7
Jim’s Wine & Spirits 19905 State Highway 7
Shorewood Tobacco, Inc. 19905 State Highway 7
ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Shorewood this 10th day of October 2023.
_______________________________
ATTEST: Jennifer Labadie, Mayor
____________________________________
Sandie Thone, City Clerk
Item
2G
City Council Meeting Item
Title/Subject: Approve Website Contract with CivicPlus
Meeting Date: October 10, 2023
Prepared by: Sandie Thone, City Clerk/Human Resources Director
Reviewed by: Marc Nevinski, City Administrator
Jared Shepherd, City Attorney
Eric Wilson, Communications Coordinator
Attachments: CivicPlus Website Contract
Background
During this year’s 2024 Budget process the City Council and staff explored the opportunity to
consider other website providers pending the March 2024 contract expiration with the city’s
current website vendor. The City Council unanimously supported the new website and staff met
with, received demonstrations, and proposals from four vendors. At its September 25, 2023
City Council meeting, Shorewood City Council heard and considered a presentation by city staff
and CivicPlus representatives, and voted unanimously to approve a proposal by CivicPlus
authorizing staff to begin working with them and bring back the Contract for Website Services
to the October 10, 2023 City Council meeting for final approval. The CivicPlus Contract
including the Statement of Work and the Master Services Agreement has been reviewed by our
city attorney’s office. The City Attorney has recommended the City accept the Contract;
Statement of Work and Master Services Agreement as written with one cautionary
understanding of Section 48. Provision of the Master Services Agreement (in blue):
48. Due to the rapidly changing nature of software as a service and digital communications,
CivicPlus may unilaterally update this Agreement from time to time. In the event
CivicPlus believes such change is a material alteration of the terms herein, CivicPlus will
provide Customer with written notice describing such change via email or through its
website. Customer’s continued use of the Services following such updates constitutes
Customer’s acceptance of the same. In the event Customer rejects the update to the
terms herein, Customer must notify CivicPlus of its objection within ten (10) days receipt
of notice of such update.
The city attorney’s office explained the provision is like a double unilateral―they get to make
changes as they please AND they get to decide what is a “material alteration” that requires
them to notify the City of the changes that they get to make as they please. It is unlikely that
CivicPlus would be willing to amend that section of the Agreement, so it is specifically called out
for awareness. Since there is only a 10-day window for the City to object, it will require some
extra diligence by staff to monitor the contract. With that understanding, the recommendation
stands to accept and move forward with the SOW and the Master Services Agreement as
written and presented.
Website Process Timeline (Tentative; the official timeline will be determined by CivicPlus)
October 10-October 31, 2023; PROJECT KICKOFF:
Planning and Scheduling
Assigning Page Review to Department Staff
Create Website Subcommittee
November 1-30, 2023; INITIAL REVIEW:
Mood Board Layout
Content Processing Meeting
Design Discovery
Page Review Completion
December 1, 2023 – January 30, 2024; DESIGN AND CONFIGURE:
Design Concept Development
Content Development
Agenda and Minutes Migration
Website Completion
February 1-14, 2024; OPTIMIZE:
Website Finalization
Website Testing Group
February 15-29, 2024; EDUCATE:
Training
March 1-March 15;2024; LAUNCH:
Website Launch and Go Live – March 15, 2024
Financial Considerations
As presented and approved at the September 25 City Council meeting, the cost for the new
website with CivicPlus will be paid utilizing a Cost-Phased-Approach (CPA) which will total
$15,598.02 in fiscal year 2024. The cost will be funded from the Administration Contractual
Services budget as presented and approved by the city council during the 2024 budget process.
As discussed at the budget work session and the September 25 City Council meeting, similar
expenditures will occur in 2025 and 2026 as delineated below:
Action Requested
Motion to approve the Website Contract with CivicPlus as presented and recommended by the
City Attorney. Motion, second and simple majority vote is required.
Tubufnfou!pg!Xpsl
DjwjdQmvt
Rvpuf!$;R.56753.2
413!Tpvui!5ui!Tu/!Tvjuf!611
Nboibuubo-!LT!77613
Ebuf;703903134!3;28!QN
VT
Fyqjsft!Po;2104103134
Dmjfou;Cjmm!Up;
TIPSFXPPE-!NJOOFTPUBTIPSFXPPE-!NJOOFTPUB
TBMFTQFSTPOQipofFNBJMEFMJWFSZ!NFUIPEQBZNFOU!NFUIPE
Ifdups!Psufhbifdups/psufhbAdjwjdqmvt/dpnOfu!41
RUZQSPEVDU!OBNFEFTDSJQUJPOQSPEVDU
UZQF
2/11Boovbm!.!DjwjdFohbhf!DfousbmBoovbm!.!DjwjdFohbhf!DfousbmSfofxbcmf
2/11Iptujoh!'!Tfdvsjuz!Boovbm!Gff!.Iptujoh!'!Tfdvsjuz!Boovbm!Gff!.!DjwjdFohbhf!DfousbmSfofxbcmf
!DjwjdFohbhf!Dfousbm
2/11TTM!Nbobhfnfou!!DQ!QspwjefeTTM!Nbobhfnfou!!DQ!Qspwjefe!Pomz!2!qfs!epnbjoSfofxbcmf
Pomz)Boovbmmz!Sfofxt*
2/1159!Npoui!Sfeftjho!Qsfnjvn59!Npoui!Sfeftjho!Qsfnjvn!Boovbm!.!DjwjdFohbhfSfofxbcmf
Boovbm!.!DjwjdFohbhf!DfousbmDfousbm
2/11EOT!boe!Epnbjo!Iptujoh!BoovbmEOT!boe!Epnbjo!Iptujoh!Boovbm!Gff!iuuqt;00Sfofxbcmf
Gff!)iuuq;00VSM*dj/tipsfxppe/no/vt0
2/11EOT!boe!Epnbjo!Iptujoh!TfuvqEOT!boe!Epnbjo!Iptujoh!Tfuvq!iuuqt;00Pof.ujnf
)iuuq;00VSM*dj/tipsfxppe/no/vt0
2/11Qsfnjvn!Jnqmfnfoubujpo!.Qsfnjvn!JnqmfnfoubujpoPof.ujnf
!DjwjdFohbhf
311/11Dpoufou!Efwfmpqnfou!.!2!Qbhf!.Dpoufou!Efwfmpqnfou!.!2!Qbhf!.!DjwjdFohbhfPof.ujnf
!DjwjdFohbhf
7/11Ofx!Dvtupnfs!Tztufn!UsbjojohDjwjdFohbhf!Tztufn!Usbjojoh!.!Wjsuvbm-!Vq!up!5!IpvstPof.ujnf
)4i-!wjsuvbm*!.!Xfc!Dfousbm
3/11Bhfoebt!'!Njovuft!NjhsbujpoDpoufou!Njhsbujpo!;!Bhfoebt!'!Njovuft!.!Qfs!211Pof.ujnf
.!QEG!.!211!Nffujoht!.Nffujoht!)Bqqspy/!2!zfbs*
!DjwjdFohbhf
Qbhf!2!pg!5
Mjtu!Qsjdf!.!Zfbs!2!UpubmVTE!64-159/42
Jojujbm!Ufsn!'!Sfofxbm!EbufCfhjoojoh!bu!tjhojoh!boe!foejoh!2304203137/
Sfofxbm!Ebuf;!Kbovbsz!2!pg!fbdi!dbmfoebs!zfbs
Qbhf!3!pg!5
Dibsu!pg!Qbznfout
Boovbm!Tvctdsjqujpo!DibshftDQB!Zfbsmz!DibshfUpubm!Boovbm!Cjmmjoh
Zfbs!Pof VTE!8-:61/11VTE!8-759/13VTE!26-6:9/13
Zfbs!Uxp VTE!9-458/61VTE!8-759/13VTE!26-::6/63
Zfbs!Uisff VTE!9-875/99VTE!8-759/13VTE!27-523/9:
Zfbs!Gpvs VTE!:-314/23VTE!1/11VTE!:-314/23
Jojujbm!Ufsn4:!Npouit
Jojujbm!Ufsn!Jowpjdf!TdifevmfPof!ujnf!gfft!xjmm!cf!tqsfbe!frvbmmz!bdsptt!4
zfbst-!jojujbm!zfbs!jowpjdfe!bu!tjhojoh!boe!tvctfrvfou
zfbst!jowpjdfe!po!uif!boojwfstbsz!pg!tjhobuvsf!ebuf
Jojujbm!Ufsn!Jowpjdf!TdifevmfPof!ujnf!gfft!xjmm!cf!tqsfbe!frvbmmz!bdsptt!4
zfbst-!jojujbm!zfbs!jowpjdfe!po!20203135!boe!tvctfrvfou
zfbst!jowpjdfe!po!Kbovbsz!2!pg!fbdi!dbmfoebs!zfbs/
Sfofxbm!QspdfevsfBvupnbujd!2!zfbs!sfofxbm!ufsn-!vomftt!71
ebzt!opujdf!qspwjefe!qsjps!up!sfofxbm!ebuf
Sfofxbm!Jowpjdf!TdifevmfBoovbmmz!po!Sfofxbm!Ebuf
Boovbm!Vqmjgu6&!tubsujoh!jo!Zfbs!3
Uijt!Tubufnfou!pg!Xpsl!)#TPX#*!tibmm!cf!tvckfdu!up!uif!ufsnt!boe!dpoejujpot!pg!uif!DjwjdQmvt!Nbtufs!Tfswjdft!Bhsffnfou
boe!uif!bqqmjdbcmf!Tpmvujpo!boe!Tfswjdft!ufsnt!boe!dpoejujpot!mpdbufe!bu!iuuqt;00xxx/djwjdqmvt/ifmq0id0fo.vt0q0mfhbm.
tuvgg!)dpmmfdujwfmz-!uif!#Cjoejoh!Ufsnt#*-!Cz!tjhojoh!uijt!TPX-!Dmjfou!fyqsfttmz!bhsfft!up!uif!ufsnt!boe!dpoejujpot!pg!uif
Cjoejoh!Ufsnt!uispvhipvu!uif!ufsn!pg!uijt!TPX/
Qbhf!4!pg!5
Bddfqubodf
Uif!voefstjhofe!ibt!sfbe!boe!bhsfft!up!uif!gpmmpxjoh!Cjoejoh!Ufsnt-!xijdi!bsf!jodpsqpsbufe!joup!uijt!TPX-!boe!ibwf
dbvtfe!uijt!TPX!up!cf!fyfdvufe!bt!pg!uif!ebuf!tjhofe!cz!uif!Dvtupnfs!xijdi!xjmm!cf!uif!Fggfdujwf!Ebuf;
Gps!DjwjdQmvt!Cjmmjoh!Jogpsnbujpo-!qmfbtf!wjtju!iuuqt;00xxx/djwjdqmvt/dpn0wfsjgz0
Bvuipsj{fe!Dmjfou!TjhobuvsfDjwjdQmvt
Cz;Cz;
``````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````
Obnf;Obnf;
``````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````
Ujumf;Ujumf;
``````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````
Ebuf;Ebuf;
``````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````
Pshboj{bujpo!Mfhbm!Obnf;
```````````````````````````````````
Cjmmjoh!Dpoubdu;
```````````````````````````````````
Ujumf;
```````````````````````````````````
Cjmmjoh!Qipof!Ovncfs;
```````````````````````````````````
Cjmmjoh!Fnbjm;
```````````````````````````````````
Cjmmjoh!Beesftt;
```````````````````````````````````
```````````````````````````````````
Nbjmjoh!Beesftt;!)Jg!ejggfsfou!gspn!bcpwf*
```````````````````````````````````
```````````````````````````````````
QP!Ovncfs;!)Jogp!offefe!po!Jowpjdf!)QP!ps!Kpc$*!jg!sfrvjsfe*
```````````````````````````````````
Qbhf!5!pg!5
Item
2H
City Council Meeting Item
Title/Subject: Approve Recruitment for Seasonal Ice Rink Attendants
Meeting Date: October 10, 2023
Prepared by: Sandie Thone, City Clerk/Human Resources Director
Reviewed by: Janelle Crossfield, Park/Recreation Director
Marc Nevinski, City Administrator
Attachments: None
Background: There are currently two public parks in the city limits that have the capacity for
ice skating/hockey rinks in the winter months and a warming house that the city staffs with ice
rink attendants. The city parks include Cathcart Park and Manor Park. Through 2019, the city
also had a skating rink and warming house at Freeman Park, but the location was not utilized
frequently and had several logistical and problematic issues therefore was discontinued.
To operate the warming house facilities at the above parks, the city hires seasonal employees
to serve as ice rink attendants. The skating rinks typically open as early in the season as is
physically possible with winter conditions for rink flooding. Once the rinks are completed,
weather permitting, the warming houses at the parks have historically supported the hours of
Monday through Friday from 3:30 p.m. to 9:00 p.m., Saturday from 11:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. and
Sunday from Noon to 9:00 p.m. and extended hours on planned school closure days such as
holidays or workshop days from 10:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. The City has employed as few as two
and up to 10 rink attendants to ensure the warming houses are open for skaters. Staff is
expecting several rink attendants from the 2022-2023 skating season to return to the positions
and are hopeful for the recruitment of additional rink attendants. Rink Attendants are required
to pass a National Child Protection Act (NCPA) BCA background check before being employed in
this capacity.
Financial Considerations: The position is classified on the city’s compensation schedule as Grade
1 with a pay range of $13.23 to $19.84 per hour.
Action Requested: Staff respectfully recommend the city council approve the seasonal
recruitment for ice skating rink attendants to staff the city’s warming houses during the upcoming
skating season. Motion, second and simple majority vote required.
Mission Statement: The City of Shorewood is committed to providing residents quality public services, a
healthy environment, a variety of attractive amenities, a sustainable tax base, and sound financial
management through effective, efficient, and visionary leadership. Page 1
City Council Meeting Item
Item
Title/Subject: Adopt Resolution Approving a Special Assessment
2I
26370 Peach Circle
Meeting Date: October 10, 2023
Prepared by: Marc Nevinski, City Administrator
Attachments: Assessment Agreement
Resolution Approving and Adopting a Special Assessment
Background:
To assist in managing the cost of connecting to City water, the City allows homeowners to
request the water access charge (WAC) of $10,000 be specially assessed to their property and
paid through property taxes through an assessment agreement. The owners of 26370 Peach
Circle wish to enter into such an assessment agreement pursuant to Minnesota Statutes
Chapter 429.
The special assessment will be certified to taxes and will be payable in five annual installments
beginning in 2024 at an interest rate of 5.0%. The assessment will run with the property and
the owner may pay off the assessment balance at any time. The owners also waive any rights
to appeal the assessment, and the agreement will be recorded against the property.
Financial or Budget Considerations:
Connecting to City water provides revenue which supports the City’s water utility fund.
Action Requested:
Motion to adopt the resolution approving and adopting a special assessment agreement for
26370 Peach Circle, Shorewood, Minnesota and authorizing the Mayor to sign the assessment
agreement.
Mission Statement: The City of Shorewood is committed to providing residents quality public
services, a healthy environment, a variety of attractive amenities, a sustainable tax base, and
sound financial management through effective, efficient, and visionary leadership. Page 1
ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT is made this 10th day of October, 2023, by and between the City of Shorewood
(SHOREWOOD), a municipal corporation organized under the laws of the State of Minnesota, located at
5755 Country Club Road, Shorewood, MN 55331 and Dirk Koeing and Heather McMullen (OWNER).
RECITALS
WHEREAS, the OWNER is the owner of the real property located at: 26370 Peach Circle, Shorewood,
MN, 55331; PID: 32-117-23-42-0021, legally described as follows:
(“SUBJECT PROPERTY”)
Lot 2, Block 1, Strawberry Fields 2nd Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota
W HEREAS, the OWNER desires to connect to the municipal water supply; and,
WHEREAS, the present Water Access Charge is $10,000; and
WHEREAS, the OWNER requests that the full amount of the Water Access charge be assessed against
the SUBJECT PROPERTY pursuant to Minn. Stat. Ch. 429.
AGREEMENT
NOW THEREFORE, pursuant to the mutual agreements provided herein, it is agreed by and between the
CITY and the OWNER as follows:
1. The OWNER represents and warrants that he is the OWNER of the SUBJECT PROPERTY and that
he has full legal authority to encumber the SUBJECT PROPERTY and that as of the date of the
execution of this agreement, the OWNER has fee title to the SUBJECT PROPERTY subject only to
the liens, interests or encumbrances of record.
225849v1
2. The OWNER understands and requests that the City levy the Water Access Charge assessed
against the PROPERTY in the amount of $10,000.00 (“Assessment”).
3. The OWNER understands and agrees that SHOREWOOD will provide that the Assessment is
payable in five (5) annual installments without deferment and will bear an interest rate of five
(5.0) percent per annum. The Assessment shall be deemed adopted on the date this Agreement
has been signed by all parties. The installments shall begin with taxes paid in 2024 and collected
with the ad valorem taxes at the times due as determined by Hennepin County.
4. The OWNER agrees that the covenants, waivers and agreements contained in this Agreement
shall bind the successors and assigns of the OWNER and shall encumber the PROPERTY in
accordance with the agreements described herein.
5. The OWNER its successors and assigns, waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to
the Assessment including but not limited to public hearing requirements and any claim that the
assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. Property Owner waives any appeal rights
otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081.
6. The OWNER, its successors and assigns, hereby unconditionally releases and forever discharges the
City, its elected officials, employees, agents and insurers from any and all claims and causes of
action of whatever kind or nature that is in any way connected with the Assessment.
This Agreement shall be binding upon Property Owner and its successors and assigns. This
Agreement shall run with the land and may be recorded against the title to the Subject Property.
\[Remainder of page is intentionally left blank.
Signature pages follow.\]
225849v1
OWNER
By: ______________________________________ Date: _________________________
By: ______________________________________ Date: _________________________
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
By: ______________________________________ Date: _________________________
Its _____________________________
By: ______________________________________ Date: _________________________
Its _____________________________
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) SS:
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
The foregoing ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT dated _________________________ was sworn and
subscribed before me in person this ____ day of _________________, 20__ by ___________________
_______________________ and _______________________________.
__________________________________
Notary Public
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) SS:
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
The foregoing ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT dated _________________________ was sworn and
subscribed before me in person this ____ day of _________________, 20__ by Jennifer Labadie, Mayor,
and by Sandie Thone, City Clerk of the City of Shorewood (a Minnesota Municipal Corporation), who are
personally known to me, on behalf of the Corporation and pursuant to the authority of the City Council.
____________________________________
Notary Public
225849v1
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
RESOLUTION NO. 23-101
A RESOLUTION APPROVING AND ADOPTING A SPECIAL ASSESSMENT
WHEREAS, Dirk Koenig and Heather McMullen, (“Owner”) has requested that the Shorewood
City Council specially assess water access charges that affect Owners’ property at 26370 Peach
Circle, Shorewood, Minnesota (PID 32-117-23-42-0021) and legally described in Exhibit A
attached hereto (“Subject Property”); and
WHEREAS, the City has received the following signed Assessment Agreement, Exhibit B
attached hereto, waiving all applicable assessment procedural requirements and requesting to
be assessed for the water access charge in the amount itemized therein for the Subject
Property.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD:
1. The signed Assessment Agreement is hereby accepted and approved.
2. The water access charge amounting to $10,000.00 is hereby adopted and shall
constitute a special assessment against the Subject Property and hereby made part of
this Resolution by reference and that the tract of land therein included is hereby found
to be benefited by the charge and connection to municipal water in the amount of
the assessment levied against it.
3. Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments without deferment
extending over a period of five (5) years, the first of the installments to be payable
with taxes paid in 2024 and shall bear the interest rate of 5.0% per annum.
4. The Owners, at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the County Auditor,
may pay the whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the
date of payment, to the City, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire
assessment is paid within thirty (30) days from the adoption of this Resolution; and
such owner may at any time thereafter, pay the City the entire amount of the
assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in
which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15 or
interest will be charged through December 31 of the next succeeding year. The
Owners may also at any time prior to November 15, of any year, pay the remaining
unpaid principal balance with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which
such prepayment is made.
225851v1
5. The City Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the
County Auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the County.
th
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Shorewood this 10 day of October, 2023.
___________________________
Mayor Jennifer Labadie
ATTEST
______________________________
Sandie Thone, City Clerk
225851v1
Exhibit A
Legal Description
Lot 2, Block 1, Strawberry Fields 2nd Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota
225851v1
Exhibit B
\[Assessment Agreement\]
225851v1
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 23-102
A RESOLUTION APPROVING AN ENCROACHMENT AGREEMENT WITH PROPERTY AT 5880
PRESTWICK COURT
WHEREAS, the City of Shorewood is a Minnesota municipal corporation operating as a statutory
city under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and
WHEREAS, Justin Krein and Bridge Krein, the property owners located at 5880 Prestwick Court
rd
(Lot 4, Block 1, Minnetonka Country Club 3 Addition) within the City of Shorewood; and
WHEREAS, the property includes a drainage and utility easement around its perimeter; and
WHEREAS, the property owner proposes to construct a fire pit and patio partially within the
property and partially within the drainage and utility easement, generally located on the
northwest side.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD,
MINNESOTA AS FOLLOWS:
1. Hereby approves the Encroachment Agreement with the property owners of 5880 Prestwick
Court.
2. Authorizes the Mayer and City Administrator, on behalf of the city, to sign the agreement
and execute any other necessary documentation to validate the agreement.
Adopted by the City Council of Shorewood, Minnesota this 10th day of October 2023.
__________________________
Jennifer Labadie, Mayor
Attest:
___________________________
Sandie Thone, City Clerk
Tupsnxbufs!Cftu!Nbobhfnfou!Qsbdujdft!)CNQt*!
Jotqfdujpot!boe!Nbjoufobodf!Qmbo
Qspkfdu!Obnf;Mblf!Qbsl!Wjmmbt
DTH!Qspkfdu!Ovncfs!33338
Qspkfdu!Pxofs;UTNM!Qspqfsujft-!MMD
Qspqfsuz!Beesftt;35431!'!35361!Tnjuiupxo!Spbe!
Upolb!Cbz!'!Tipsfxppe-!Njooftpub!66442
Ebuf;!1903203134
Nbjoufobodf!Dpoubdu!
Qfstpo0Qspqfsuz!Pxofs;UCE
Uijt!Pqfsbujpo!boe!Nbjoufobodf!Qmbo!ibt!cffo!qsfqbsfe!cz!Djwjm!Tjuf!Hspvq/
Njlf!Tiffibo!QF-!Mjdfotf!Op/!6771:
xxx/DjwjmTjufHspvq/dpn!!!!!6111!Hmfoxppe!Bwf!!Hpmefo!Wbmmfz!!Njooftpub!!66533!!!!!)723*726.1171
Ubcmf!pg!Dpoufout;
2/Tvnnbsz!Obssbujwf!
3/CNQ!Mpdbujpo!Nbq
4/CNQ!Jotqfdujpo!Bdujwjujft
5/CNQ!Nbjoufobodf!Bdujwjujft!
6/CNQ!Jotqfdujpo!boe!Nbjoufobodf!Sfqpsu
Jouspevdujpo;
Tupsnxbufs!usfbunfou!gps!uijt!tjuf!jt!bddpnqmjtife!cz!jnqmfnfoujoh!b!Gjmusbujpo!Cbtjo!)ifsfbgufs!
sfgfssfe!up!bt!uif!tztufn!ps!cbtjo*/!Uif!tztufn!gps!uijt!qspkfdu!jt!ejsfdujoh!uif!qspkfdu!tupsnxbufs!
svopgg!wjb!tvsgbdf!esbjobhf!boe!tupsn!tfxfs!qjqjoh!gspn!sbjo!fwfout!up!b!tvsgbdf!gjmusbujpo!cbtjo!po!
uif!Tpvui!tjef!pg!uif!tjuf/!Uif!tupsnxbufs!mfbwft!uif!cbtjo!wjb!esbjo!ujmf!bu!uif!cpuupn!pg!uif!cbtjo!
uifo!ju!jt!ejtdibshfe!joup!uif!djuzt!fyjtujoh!tupsnxbufs!tfxfs!tztufn/!Uijt!cbtjo!jt!eftjhofe!up!
qspwjef!xbufs!rvbmjuz!usfbunfou!boe!nffu!sbuf!dpouspm!sfrvjsfnfout!pg!Njoofibib!Dsffl!Xbufstife!
Ejtusjdu/!
Jo!beejujpo!up!uif!po.tjuf!gjmusbujpo!cbtjo-!b!tvnqfe!nboipmf-!tvnqfe!dbudi!cbtjo-!boe!pvumfu!dpouspm!
tusvduvsf!bsf!bmtp!jefoujgjfe!bt!qbsu!pg!uif!CNQ!tztufn/!Tvnqt!bsf!up!ibwf!tfejnfou!sfnpwfe!wjb!
Wbd!usvdl!xifo!tvnqt!bsf!bu!61&!dbqbdjuz!xjui!tfejnfou-!ps!bt!offefe/
Offe!gps!Jotqfdujpo!boe!Nbjoufobodf;
Uif!tupsnxbufs!tztufn!jt!uif!gjstu!mjof!pg!efgfotf!gspn!dpowfzjoh!qpmmvubout!epxotusfbn!joup!djuz!
tupsn!tfxfs!boe!qvcmjd!xbufs!xbzt-!xpstfojoh!xbufs!rvbmjuz/!Uif!qvsqptf!pg!sfhvmbs!jotqfdujpo!boe!
nbjoufobodf!jt!up!fotvsf!uif!qspqfs!pqfsbujpo!pg!uif!tztufn!boe!uif!pwfsbmm!tupsn!tztufn/!Sfhvmbs!
nbjoufobodf!pg!uif!tztufn!boe!bmm!jut!dpnqpofout!jt!sfrvjsfe!up!bdijfwf!uif!xbufs!rvbmjuz!pckfdujwf/!
Uijt!Pqfsbujpot!boe!Nbjoufobodf!qmbo!sfrvjsft!gsfrvfou!jotqfdujpot-!qfs!jotqfdujpo!
bdujwjujft!ubcmf/!Nbjoufobodf!bdujwjujft!sfrvjsfe!qfs!nbjoufobodf!bdujwjujft!ubcmf!gps!fbdi!
gmbhhfe!jotqfdujpo!jufn!bsf!sfrvjsfe!up!cf!dpnqmfufe!bt!tppo!bt!qpttjcmf!gpmmpxjoh!boz!
jotqfdujpo/
Sftqpotjcjmjuz!pg!Qspqfsuz!Pxofs!gpmmpxjoh!dpotusvdujpo0dpnqmfujpo;
Vqpo!jotubmmbujpo!pg!uif!bqqspwfe!tztufn-!uif!qspqfsuz!nbobhfs!bttvnft!sftqpotjcjmjuz!boe!bmm!dptut!
bttpdjbufe!xjui!uif!tztufnt!mpoh.ufsn!pqfsbujpo!boe!nbjoufobodf/!Uif!qspqfsuz!pxofs!tibmm!
nbjoubjo!sfdpset!pg!bmm!jotqfdujpot!boe!nbjoufobodf!pg!uif!tztufn0t!boe!tvcnju!sfqpsut!up!uif!
qspqfs!bvuipsjuz!)djuz-!xbufstife-!fud/*!jg!sfrvjsfe/!Uif!gpmmpxjoh!epdvnfou!jt!b!hvjef!up!uif!
jotqfdujpo!boe!nbjoufobodf!pg!uif!tztufn/
xxx/DjwjmTjufHspvq/dpn!!!!!6111!Hmfoxppe!Bwf!!Hpmefo!Wbmmfz!!Njooftpub!!66533!!!!!)723*!726.1171
4/!Jotqfdujpo!Bdujwjujft!)Gjmusbujpo!Cbtjo*;
Sfdpnnfoefe
Jotqfdujpo!BdujwjuzJotqfdujpo!GsfrvfodzPvudpnft0Bdujpot
2/!Fotvsf!uibu!dpousjcvujoh!bsfb-!gbdjmjuz-!
Npouimz!boe!gpmmpxjoh!mbshf!tupsn!Opujgz!nbjoufobodf!tubgg0dpousbdups!pg!offe!gps!
jomfut-!boe!pvumfut!bsf!dmfbs!pg!efcsjt/
fwfoutefcsjt!sfnpwbm!)Tff!Nbjoufobodf!Bdujwjuz!2*/
3/!!Fotvsf!uibu!uif!dpousjcvujoh!bsfb!jt!
Npouimz!Opujgz!nbjoufobodf!tubgg!pg!offe!gps!
tubcjmj{fe!boe!npxfe-!xjui!dmjqqjoht!
dmjqqjoh!sfnpwbm!)Tff!Nbjoufobodf!Bdujwjuz!
sfnpwfe/
3*/
4/!!Fotvsf!uibu!bdujwjujft!jo!uif!NpouimzOpujgz!nbjoufobodf!tubgg0dpousbdups!pg!offe!
esbjobhf!bsfb!njojnj{f!gps!pjm!sfnpwbm!)Tff!Nbjoufobodf!Bdujwjuz!
pjm0hsfbtf!boe!tfejnfou!fousz!4*/
up!uif!tztufn/
5/!!Jotqfdu!jomfut-!pvumfut-!tvnqt-!dbudi!
BoovbmmzOpujgz!nbjoufobodf!tubgg0dpousbdups!pg!offe!
cbtjot!boe!pwfsgmpx!tqjmmxbz!up!fotvsf!
gps!sfqbjs!)Tff!Nbjoufobodf!Bdujwjuz!5*/
hppe!dpoejujpo!boe!op!fwjefodf!pg!
fsptjpo!ps!tfejnfou!efqptjut/!Bt!
bqqmjdbcmf/!
6/!!Difdl!up!tff!uibu!uif!cbtjo!cfe!jt!Cjboovbmmz!boe!gpmmpxjoh!mbshf!Opujgz!nbjoufobodf!tubgg0dpousbdups!pg!offe!
dmfbo!pg!tfejnfou
tupsn!fwfoutgps!tfejnfou!sfnpwbm!)Tff!Nbjoufobodf!
Bdujwjuz!6*/
7/!!Tubcjmj{f!boz!fspefe!bsfbt/
BoovbmmzOpujgz!nbjoufobodf!tubgg0dpousbdups!pg!offe!
gps!fsptjpo!dpouspm!)Tff!Nbjoufobodf!
Bdujwjuz!7*/
8/Jotqfdu!qmbou!nbufsjbm!jo!uif!cbtjo!gps!
BoovbmmzOpujgz!nbjoufobodf!tubgg0dpousbdups!pg!
ifbmui-!ebnbhf-!boe!qmbou!dpwfsbhf/!
offefe!sfqmboujoh!)Tff!Nbjoufobodf!
Jg!bqqmjdbcmf/!
Bdujwjuz!8*/
++!Gps!beejujpobm!jogpsnbujpo-!tff!uif!NQDB!Tupsnxbufs!Nbovbm-!3116!
iuuq;00xxx/qdb/tubuf/no/vt0xbufs0tupsnxbufs0tupsnxbufs.nbovbm/iunm
xxx/DjwjmTjufHspvq/dpn!!!!!6111!Hmfoxppe!Bwf!!Hpmefo!Wbmmfz!!Njooftpub!!66533!!!!!)723*!726.1171
5/!Nbjoufobodf!Bdujwjujft!)Gjmusbujpo!Cbtjo*;
Nbjoufobodf!BdujwjuzGsfrvfodzQspdfevsfNbjoufobodf!Cz
2/!Usbti!boe!efcsjt!sfnpwbmBt!offefe!qfs!jotqfdujpo/Sfnpwf!usbti!boe!efcsjt!Cz!pxofs!vomftt
gspn!jo!boe!bspvoe!cbtjo/eftjhobufe
3/!Dmjqqjoh!sfnpwbmtBt!offefe!qfs!jotqfdujpo/Sfnpwf!dmjqqjoht!bspvoe!cbtjo!Cz!pxofs!vomftt
boe!npx!tvsspvoejoh!bsfbt!eftjhobufe
jefoujgjfe!qfs!jotqfdujpo/!
4/!!Pjm!sfnpwbmBt!offefe!qfs!jotqfdujpo/Sfnpwf!pjm!gspn!xbufs!tvsgbdf!bt!Cz!pxofs!vomftt
jefoujgjfe!qfs!jotqfdujpo/eftjhobufe
5/!Jomfut-!pvumfut-!tvnqt-!Bt!offefe!qfs!jotqfdujpo/Sfqbjs!jnqbdufe!jomfu-!pvumfu!boe0ps!Cz!pxofs!vomftt
dbudi!cbtjot!boe!pwfsgmpx!
pwfsgmpx!tqjmmxbz!qfs!psjhjobm!qmboteftjhobufe
tqjmmxbz!sfqbjs
6/!Tfejnfou!sfnpwbm!jo!Fwfsz!7!npouit!ps!xifo!Sfnpwf!bddvnvmbufe!tfejnfouCz!pxofs!vomftt
gjmusbujpo!tztufn
tfejnfoubddvnvmbujpo!gspn!cbtjo!qfs!psjhjobm!qmboteftjhobufe
fydffet!4!jo!uif!cpuupn!pg!
uif!cbtjo/
7/!Fsptjpo!tubcjmj{bujpoBt!offefe!qfs!jotqfdujpo/Sfqbjs!jefoujgjfe!fspefe!bsfb!qfs!Cz!pxofs!vomftt
psjhjobm!qmbot/!eftjhobufe
8/!Qmbou!sfqmbdfnfou-!jg!Bt!offefe!qfs!jotqfdujpo/Sfnpwf!ebnbhfe!ps!efbe!qmbou!Cz!pxofs!vomftt
bqqmjdbcmf!
nbufsjbm!gspn!cbtjo/!Sfqmbou!eftjhobufe
jefoujgjfe!qmbou!tqfdjft0tffe!njy!
qfs!psjhjobm!qmbot/!!
++!Gps!beejujpobm!jogpsnbujpo-!tff!uif!NQDB!Tupsnxbufs!Nbovbm-!3116
iuuq;00xxx/qdb/tubuf/no/vt0xbufs0tupsnxbufs0tupsnxbufs.nbovbm/iunm
Mpdbm!Nbjoufobodf!Dpousbdupst;
Dibsmjf!XjmtpoKfttf!XjmdpyNjlf!XbmefocvshNbuu!Njlmzb
Njooftpub!Vujmjujft!Dbsm!Cpmboefs!boe!Ebwjet!Izesp!WbdWbmmfz.Sjdi!Dp/-!Jod/
'!FydbwbujohTpot)762*!318.7245):63*!559.4113!
)762*!575.6643)762*!335.73::njlfxAebwjetizespwbd/dpnnbuuAwbmmfzsjdi/dpn
dibsmjfAnovf/ofukfttfAcpmboefs/dpn
xxx/DjwjmTjufHspvq/dpn!!!!!6111!Hmfoxppe!Bwf!!Hpmefo!Wbmmfz!!Njooftpub!!66533!!!!!)723*!726.1171
INSPECTION & MAINTENANCE REPORT
Jotqfdups;
CNQ!JE!$;
Ebuf;
Pxofs;
Mpdbujpo;
VoefshspvoeGjmusbujpo!Efwjdf!)Dbsusjehft*
GjmusbujpoCbtjo
Tztufn!Uzqf;
Xfu!Cbtjo
JogjmusbujpoCbtjo
Voefshspvoe!Tupsn!Dibncfs
Puifs
Bddftt!up!uif!Tztufn!jt;
Dmfbs
Pctusvdufe VobcmfupBddftt
Jotqfdujpo!Pctfswfe;
Nbjoufobodf!Bdujwjujft!Dpnqmfufe;!
Difdl!bmm!uibu!bqqmz!boe!opuf!mpdbujpo-!bnpvou-!fud/
Difdl!bmm!uibu!bqqmz!boe!opuf!bdujwjuz
Usbti0Efcsjt
Usbti0EfcsjtSfnpwbm
Pjm0Hsfbtf
Pjm0HsfbtfSfnpwbm
TfejnfouSfnpwbm
Tfejnfou
jg!zft-!qspwjef!efqui
Jg!zft-!xifsf@
Tvnq
Gpsfcbz Qsfusfbunfou
Fsptjpo
FspefeBsfbtTubcjmj{fe
Ebnbhfe!Qmbou!Nbufsjbm
Ebnbhfe!Qmbou!Nbufsjbm!Sfqmbdfe
Beejujpobm!Qmbou!Hspxui!Sfnpwfe
Beejujpobm!Qmbou!Hspxui
Jmmjdju!Ejtdibshf
Jmmjdju!Ejtdibshf!Jefoujgjfe
Tusvduvsbm!Ebnbhf!Sfqbjsfe
Tusvduvsbm!Ebnbhf
Sfqmbdfe!Dbsusjehft
Tuboejoh!Xbufs
Jg!zft-!eftdsjcf;
Sftjevbmt!Sfnpwfe
Jg!zft-!eftdsjcf!ejtqptbm;
Zft
Ep!CNQ!dpnqpofout!nbudi!psjhjobm!eftjho@
Op
Jg!op-!xiz@
Zft
Ep!CNQ!dpnqpofout!sfrvjsf!nbjoufobodf@
Op
Jg!zft-!eftdsjcf;
Jufnt!offejoh!gvsuifs!xpsl;
Beejujpobm!Dpnnfout;
Qmfbtf!dpnqmfuf!uijt!jotqfdujpo!sfdpse!gps!uif!sfgfsfodfe!qspqfsuz/!Sfubjo!uif!psjhjobm!gps!zpvs!gjmft!boe!gpsxbse!b!dpqz!pg!uif!dpnqmfufe
gpsn!up!zpvs!mpdbm!xbufstife!sfqsftfoubujwf/
local watershed district.
Civil Site Group, PC • 5000 Glenwood Ave • Golden Valley• Minnesota • 55442
www.CivilSiteGroup.com • (612) 615-0060
City Council Meeting Item
Item
Title/Subject: Eureka Road Open House Report; City Project 23-01
7A
Meeting Date: Tuesday October 10, 2023
Prepared by: Andrew Budde, City Engineer
Reviewed by: Marc Nevinski, City Administrator
Matt Morreim, Director of Public Works
Attachments: Open House Comments
Background: Thursday September 21, 2023, the city held an Open House for the proposed
Eureka Road Improvements that is scheduled for 2025 construction in the Capital Improvement
Plan.
The city had previously authorized the preparation of a scoping study to gather information
along the roadway, complete public engagement, present alternatives, and ultimately provide a
recommendation. In March 2023 a petition was received by the city that was signed by
approximately 40 residents that they want the roadway resurfaced in 2023 due to its poor
condition and they don’t want the roadway widened, addition of curb & gutter, addition of
sidewalk, tree removal, or the city to acquire easements if needed for those improvements.
The council directed staff to pause on completing the scoping study and to prepare information
for an Open House and online engagement to gather input from residents on the project. To
minimize efforts, staff prepared two options for discussion at the Open House and were
prepared to hear concerns and answer questions related to the project on a one-on-one basis
with individual residents. The two options presented were as follows:
Option 1:) Reclamation with addition of curb & sidewalk on the east side
Option 2:) Mill & overlay and no curb or sidewalk
The large majority (approx. 3/4 or more) of input at the open house and gathered through the
online engagement stated that they were not in favor of adding a sidewalk, did not want to
remove trees, and were in support of Option 2. The summary of all the online comments are
attached. Some additional feedback from the open house was that there may be some
“middle” of the road solutions that would help extend the pavement life better than a mill &
overlay and that this could possibly be accomplished without taking of trees. There were also a
couple of residents that expressed drainage related concerns adjacent to their property. Also,
several residents in attendance wanted a presentation of the information at a future meeting.
Potential Next Steps:
Mission Statement: The City of Shorewood is committed to providing residents quality public
services, a healthy environment, a variety of attractive amenities, a sustainable tax base, and
sound financial management through effective, efficient, and visionary leadership. Page 1
1. Prepare information for a “middle” of the road option. This would most likely be a
roadway reclamation that adds curb and gutter where drainage concerns exist.
Most of the front yards along the roadway already drain toward the street and have
portions of bituminous curb. The city would typically install concrete curb & gutter
in these areas to be a permanent solution or require a ditch to allow water to drain
in turf areas and not at the edge of the pavement which prematurely deteriorates
the pavement.
2. Prepare information to evaluate an on roadway dedicated walking/biking lane. This
is not very common, but there is guidance for low speed, low volume, rural
roadways.
3. Provide more clarity on the difference between a full street reconstruction as was
required for Birch Bluff Rd/Strawberry Lane vs. a pavement reclamation vs. mill &
overlay as is proposed for the two options on Eureka Road. This would include life
cycle costs.
4. Update the online engagement tools with the above information and provide an
additional open house with a presentation in November 2023.
Financial or Budget Considerations: To complete the four items listed above it is estimated to
approximately $6000 in fees or 30 hours.
Action Requested: Staff is seeking guidance and direction from council on potential next steps
to advance the scoping efforts for the Eureka Road Improvements project.