08-19-25 Minutes
CITY OF SHOREWOOD COUNCIL CHAMBERS
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD
TUESDAY, AUGUST 19, 2025 7:00 P.M.
MINUTES
CALL TO ORDER
Chair Huskins called the meeting to order at 7:00 P.M.
ROLL CALL
Present: Chair Huskins; Commissioners Holker, Longo, Magistad, and Ruoff (arrived at 7:03
P.M.); Planning Director Griffiths; and City Planner Osowski
Absent: None
1. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Longo moved, Magistad seconded, approving the agenda for August 19, 2025, as
presented. Motion passed 4/0.
2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
June 3, 2025
Chair Huskins noted that he had passed along some minor edits to Planning Director Griffiths
before the meeting.
Holker moved, Longo seconded, approving the Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of
June 3, 2025, as presented. Motion passed 4/0.
Commissioner Ruoff arrived at the meeting.
3. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR
There were no comments.
4. PUBLIC HEARINGS
Chair Huskins explained that the Planning Commission is comprised of residents of the
City of Shorewood who are serving as volunteers on the Commission. The Commissioners
are appointed by the City Council. The Commission’s role is to help the City Council in
determining zoning and planning issues. One of the Commission’s responsibilities is to
hold public hearings and to help develop the factual record for an application and to make
a non-binding recommendation to the City Council. The recommendation is advisory only.
A. PUBLIC HEARING – CANNABIS CITY CODE AMENDMENTS
Planning Director Griffiths explained that this item was a housekeeping item to clean up the City’s
regulations for cannabis. He gave some background regarding the State's legalization of
recreational cannabis sales, past discussions and actions the City has taken, additional legal
CITY OF SHOREWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
AUGUST 19, 2025
Page 2 of 5
counsel related to the City’s initial decision to delegate the registration authority to the County,
and Council direction for rescinding that and taking over the registration process themselves. He
highlighted the proposed amendments to the Cannabis City Code. He noted that, to date, the City
had not received any public comments on this proposed amendment.
Commissioner Holker asked whether taking back the administrative side of the registration
process would be onerous or costly to the City. She asked if they might be able to hire an outside
consultant service to handle these duties for the City. She asked if the City had spelled out, within
the parameters, the areas where this use would be allowed, so they do not get a lot of applications
for places where people would not be allowed to have this use.
Planning Director Griffiths stated that they do have the parameters clearly outlined for the allowed
locations and noted that they have already received quite a few calls from people inquiring about
opening this type of business in the City. He stated that he believed it was likely that Shorewood
would have one locate in the City and briefly described the locations where this would be allowed.
He stated that the expectation is that this process would be handled similarly to the City’s liquor
licensing, and there would be heavy involvement of the SLMPD. He stated that because the City
would most likely only have one business, he did not think the burden of the registration process
was going to be a substantial burden for staff.
Commissioner Longo stated that he had asked Planning Director Griffiths if having an unmanned
kiosk would be possible, but he told him that it would not be legal at this point.
Planning Director Griffiths confirmed that having an unmanned kiosk would not currently be legal
in Minnesota.
Commissioner Magistad referenced the anticipated demand for applications and asked how the
City would deal with competing registrations.
Planning Director Griffiths explained that it would be done on a first-come, first-served basis, but
noted that he did not believe that there would be many applications submitted at the same time,
due to the number of available sites being relatively low.
Chair Huskins stated that once the City has approved the one location for this type of business,
he would suggest they get the word out on the website, so they do not get a lot of other
applications when the City is not permitted to register a second business. He referenced two
paragraphs in the document and noted that he felt there was an inconsistency with them related
to Subd. 5, Suspension of Registration and item c., Length of Suspension, and d., Reinstatement
of Registration.
Planning Director Griffiths explained that this language had been taken directly from the State
Statute and gave a brief explanation of what these sections were saying and answered
Commission questions. He stated that the City’s only role in this process was to certify zoning
compliance for the location because once the registration is issued, the State takes over
everything.
Chair Huskins opened the Public Hearing at 7:21 P.M. and noted that there was no one present
in the chambers, so he closed the Public Hearing at 7:21 P.M.
Magistad moved, Ruoff seconded, recommending approval of the Cannabis City Code
Amendments, as presented. Motion passed 5/0.
CITY OF SHOREWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
AUGUST 19, 2025
Page 3 of 5
B. PUBLIC HEARING – GRADING AND STEEP SLOPES CITY CODE
AMENDMENTS
Planning Director Griffiths explained that this was another housekeeping-type item for the
Commission to consider. He reminded the Commission that during the 2040 Comprehensive
Planning process, there was some discussion about the City’s protections for grading and steep
slopes. He explained that the City Code just was not clear on when permits were required and
reviewed the proposed amendment to the current language to address that issue.
Commissioner Longo asked if there was a risk that by raising the limit, they would compromise
the way the water flows into neighboring areas.
Planning Director Griffiths explained that when there is a grading permit request, applicants are
required to submit drainage plans to the City, regardless of the size of the project. He noted that
staff or the area watershed districts were not concerned about increasing this threshold.
Chair Huskins asked if any current projects may be affected by this change.
Planning Director Griffiths stated that there were no current applications working through the
process or any pending development applications. He explained that the only thing the City was
regulating with this was the short period of time when the construction was happening, and once
the grading project had been completed, it was over and done. He stated that the purpose of this
permit would be to set up haul routes for construction and make sure the streets were being
cleaned.
Commissioner Magistad asked if any of the numeric limits in the City’s proposed language were
different than the DNR language.
Planning Director Griffiths explained that the 100 versus 400 was not contemplated by the DNR,
but noted that the 10 or more cubic yards language within the amendment was from the DNR.
Commissioner Magistad asked how the City had arrived at these numbers.
Planning Director Griffiths stated that he assumed there were reasons when the ordinance was
originally adopted in the 1980s, but did not know what they were. He noted that a number of cities
have the 400 number as their threshold.
Chair Huskins opened the Public Hearing at 7:34 P.M., there being no one present in the
chambers, and he closed the Public Hearing at 7:34 P.M.
Holker moved, Magistad seconded, recommending approval of the Grading and Steep
Slopes City Code Amendments, as presented. Motion passed 5/0.
C. PUBLIC HEARING – 2026 FEE SCHEDULE
Planning Director Griffiths stated that the City reviews and updates its fee schedule on an annual
basis and noted that the Planning Commission was responsible for reviewing the planning-related
chapters of the schedule. He noted that the public was welcome to submit comments to the
Council when this item is brought forward by them at the September 8, 2025, meeting, since no
one was present tonight. He explained that the new fees would go into effect on January 1, 2026,
and highlighted the proposed changes for the zoning and land use fees. He explained that on
CITY OF SHOREWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
AUGUST 19, 2025
Page 4 of 5
staff’s list for the first part of 2026 would be consideration of hiring a consultant to do a
development fee study for all of their fees.
Commissioner Ruoff asked about the zoning verification letter fee and if the City had any
comparable information from other cities on what their fees were.
Planning Director Griffiths stated that he did not have those numbers with him at the meeting, but
explained that he used to work for Andover, and their fee is $1,000. He stated that the proposed
change from $50 to $250 was probably on the low end, but was moving the City in the right
direction.
Chair Huskins opened the Public Hearing at 7:48 P.M., noted that there was no one present in
the chambers, and closed the Public Hearing at 7:48 P.M.
Longo moved, Holker seconded, recommending approval of the 2026 Fee Schedule, as
presented. Motion passed 5/0.
5. OTHER BUSINESS –
A. Monthly Training Topic – Review July 28, 2025 City Council Land Use Planning
and Zoning Training
Planning Director Griffiths explained that on July 28, 2025, the City Council received Planning
and Zoning training from him and City Attorney Shepherd. He gave a brief presentation of the
training materials and reviewed: Municipal authority to plan; the role of the Planning Commission;
Zoning – implementing the Comprehensive Plan; Conditional and Interim Use Permits; Variances;
Time limits; and Public Hearings.
Commissioner Magistad asked if Planning Director Griffiths could forward the slide deck of his
presentation to the Commission.
Planning Director Griffiths stated that he would send the presentation to the Commission and
answered some follow-up questions from the Commission.
B. Upcoming City Council Liaisons
Planning Director Griffiths explained that he needed volunteers to fill the calendar for the rest of
2025.
September 8, 2025 – Chair Huskins
September 22, 2025 – Commissioner Magistad
October 27, 2025 - Commissioner Longo
December 8, 2025 – Commissioner Holker
6. REPORTS
• Council Meeting Report
Planning Director Griffiths stated that there was not much to report on the planning side of things
because they had canceled the July Planning Commission meeting. He gave a brief overview of
agenda items expected to be on the September 8, 2025, City Council meeting.
• Draft Next Meeting Agenda
CITY OF SHOREWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
AUGUST 19, 2025
Page 5 of 5
Planning Director Griffiths reviewed the application that the City had received that would be on
the September 2, 2025, Planning Commission meeting agenda.
7. ADJOURNMENT
Magistad moved, Longo seconded, adjourning the Planning Commission Meeting of
August 19, 2025, at 8:43 P.M. Motion passed 5/0.