Loading...
1979 Resolutions1979 RESOLUTIONS • 1. 2. 3• 4. 5• 6. 7• 8. 9• 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 1979 Appointments 1979 Committee Appointments 1979 Organization Minnetonka State Bank - Official Bank Maverick Newspaper - Official Newspaper Planning Commission Appointments Park Commission Appointments Cigarette Licenses Approved Building Permit - Earl Bakken Secon American Legion Baseball Team Sponsored Dock Permits a. Adeline Johnson b. ULMY Club C. Boulder Bridge d. Howards Point Marina Boulder Bridge Farm Purd - Final Plat Division - Don Anderson Wedgewood Drive Traffic Controls Maple Street Vacation Camp Fire Girls Week Year I - CDBG - Reconfirmed Request - Grant Funds Hennepin County Criminal Justice Coordinating Council Participation Law Enforce Study Griswold - Lot 102 Griswold Express Appreciation for $15,000.00 Strawberry Gardens Shorewood Yacht Club Conditional Use Permit Property Division - E. Strickland Woodhaven Second Addition Street Light - Ivy Lane - Ferncroft Drive Impound Fees - Dogs Minnesota Volunteer Recognition Week City Hall - Conditional Use Permit William Carrothers - Division Ronald Rippel - Division Halseth, Wayne - Enchanted Island Smithtown Circle Roddi Addition Strawberry Gardens Harriet Helgeson Termination Municipal Clerk's Week Police Recognition Week Freeman Property Contract for Deed - Freeman Property Registered Land Survey - Tract C & D - April 22 -28, 1 979 Asp. Robert 34400 -1071 (5960 Mill Street) Cronin, Carlton R. Gardiner /Lansing Drainage at Timber Lane Minnewashta Church Hankinson Property Division Lapping Division Danser Division 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. 33. 34. 35• 36. 37• 38. 39• 40. 40a. 41. 42. 43. 44. 45. 46. 47. 48. 49. 50. 1979 Appointments 1979 Committee Appointments 1979 Organization Minnetonka State Bank - Official Bank Maverick Newspaper - Official Newspaper Planning Commission Appointments Park Commission Appointments Cigarette Licenses Approved Building Permit - Earl Bakken Secon American Legion Baseball Team Sponsored Dock Permits a. Adeline Johnson b. ULMY Club C. Boulder Bridge d. Howards Point Marina Boulder Bridge Farm Purd - Final Plat Division - Don Anderson Wedgewood Drive Traffic Controls Maple Street Vacation Camp Fire Girls Week Year I - CDBG - Reconfirmed Request - Grant Funds Hennepin County Criminal Justice Coordinating Council Participation Law Enforce Study Griswold - Lot 102 Griswold Express Appreciation for $15,000.00 Strawberry Gardens Shorewood Yacht Club Conditional Use Permit Property Division - E. Strickland Woodhaven Second Addition Street Light - Ivy Lane - Ferncroft Drive Impound Fees - Dogs Minnesota Volunteer Recognition Week City Hall - Conditional Use Permit William Carrothers - Division Ronald Rippel - Division Halseth, Wayne - Enchanted Island Smithtown Circle Roddi Addition Strawberry Gardens Harriet Helgeson Termination Municipal Clerk's Week Police Recognition Week Freeman Property Contract for Deed - Freeman Property Registered Land Survey - Tract C & D - April 22 -28, 1 979 Asp. Robert 34400 -1071 (5960 Mill Street) Cronin, Carlton R. Gardiner /Lansing Drainage at Timber Lane Minnewashta Church Hankinson Property Division Lapping Division Danser Division 1979 RESOLUTIONS Page two 51. Svoboda - Deed 52. Tax Forfeited Lands - Public Sales Parcels 53. Stefan Freeman Property 54. Farrell Division 55. Near Mountain Preliminary Plan 56. County Contract No. 90470 57. City Hall Construction Funds 58. Road Acceptance 59. Condemnation - Minnetonka Manor Lots 8 & 9 60. Near Mountain - Well Feasability Study 61. William Gallis - Division 62. Condemnation - Minnetonka Manor - Lots 8 & 9 63. CAA Development - WHHS 64. Brian Zubert Division /Combination 65. Delinquent Utility Service Charges 66. Amesbury Water System 67. Tax Levies Budget for 1980 68. Near Mountain Well Feasibility Study 69. Transfer /Combination Funds 70. Strawberry Gardens 71. Wild Duck - Third Addition - Construction Feasibility Study 72. Wild Duck - Third Addition - Feasibility Study & Hearing Set 73. Near Mountain - Hearing Set 79 -WW -1 74. Near Mountain - Well Improvements 75. Howards Point Marina - Rezoning Application 76. Mike Arvidson Division - 5595 Timber Lane 77. CDBG Funds Public Hearing 78. HECO 11 911 Plan" 79. Luther Smith Property - Dann Mathisen C ,A r 1 DATE: HENN PIN FROM: SUBJECT: February 12, 1979 Cooperating Communities Hennepin County Year V Application Procedure I a As of this date the five Planning Area Citizen Advisory Committees ( PACAC) are completing their reviews of the proposed programs and transmitting their letters of recommendation. After consideration of these recommendations, each applicant will authorize their formal application for submittal to the Urban County. Each application should be passed by resolution (see attached sample) and should include completed application forms, housing assistance plan (HAP) goals and the response to the PACAC letter of recommendation. This latter item should address those conditions affecting project acceptance. This application package (resolution, application forms, HAP, response letter) should be submitted to this office no later than March 2, 1979. If you require assistance on any of the above please contact your area staff representative as soon as possible. • 11 • c Resolution authorizing submission of the City of St" Community Development Program to Hennepin County for consideration as part of the Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant Application, in accord with the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended. WHEREAS, the City of has executed a Cooperation Agreement with Hennepin County agreeing to participate in the Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant Program, and WHEREAS, a three year Community Development Program and Housing Assistance Plan has been prepared consistent with the Comprehensive Urban Hennepin County Community Development strategy and the Community Development Program Regulations, and WHEREAS, the three year Community Development Program and Housing Assistance Plan has been subject to citizen review pursuant to the Urban Hennepin County Citizen Participation Plait. BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of approved the proposed three year Community Development Program and Housing Assistance Plan and authorizes the appropriate execution of the appli- Eation material and transmit it to Hennepin' County for consideration as part of the Year V Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant Application. XA&1 I. • CITY OF LAKEW111i RESOLUT10" Dater 6 July, 1978 R,osolution 78 -1 Motion by Enright Sfta"4ad b Pierceall - RESOLUTION &STABLISHING RULE; AND NOCEDURE FOR 11iE CONDUCT OF THE LAKEVILLE PLANNING =1MISSION MEETING31HEARIN.,S WEREAS, it is deemed to be important - ard bc"Oficial for the Lakeville Pla -ning Commission to have written rules awd Proceduros for the conduct of business. NOW, THERaPORE, B� IT RESOLVED that the foll.owirg rules an•i procedure is hereby adopted for the Lakeville PlanningCommis: ;low. 1. Immediately following roll call a ^d approval of the preeedl -g meeting's minutes, the agenda for the evening will be accepted, with, or without, modifications, 0 U__� 2• The meeting shall 'be conducted in a structured manrner, using formal proceedings. All comments from the members, staff, and porsons preao -t shall be directed to tho Chairman, ono person spe11dn9 at a time. 3• Applicants, and other3 wishing tits =peak, should give their nam es, or present thedr carde befbto their proser.tatioh. • gtafi` and applicant prosentations to the Planning Commission shat: be oompldtely visible a-d audible -to both tha Planning Commission aril the audience. 5• There will be an open porlod ror itom not on the agenda, , at the and of the meeting, if time permits. 6. A combination of all available portingnt staff recommendations and Committee recommendations connected with the agenda items shall be given to the Planning Commission members as early as possible. It some item is missing, a note shall be in the packet saying what the exception is and when the materi-a will be supplied. The l e materis shall be as complete as possible :=rid contain.•all _po "bl`a in.farnation. 7. It is important for the Chairman to not* at the bggtnning of a public hearing that thore shall be ; a .limitod ti ime par • spcaeh. $acb _.person may speak at least once, one at a ti ne, 1t1 turn, b;btdirs onto" a&AW being recognized by the Chairman► so long as the material is not repetitive. $. The starting time for Pl G`onuni30ion moa "'tings ;K1 7.. bo beginning July 6, 197$• The adjour"ment ti=ne 'w111 be motion to extend the meeting beyond the adj4rnment time must be made and approved by the majority, of Mop, mcmbc rs present, to conduct business beyond 10130 P.M. , t. 9. All motions of the Commission whall be voted upon by a roll call of the members present. 10. The Commission will consider th.o formzti.on.,of, a sub -- committee to view controversial, or major, sitos and locations. 7 , 11. For the purpose of assuring a quorum at meeLi if a `ma bed 'is not able to attend a 'meeting, notification' - hodid` `be given the CSGy CUrk,. ADOPTED by the Lakoville Planning Commission v� F D+'1V 1`�/ 1•`11' -i nh� ~ .�.. 6 day` of ' Ju1y John C. !ismus, C ° , T A 'man - 7� J. RESOLUTION No. Requesting Hennepin County to apply for' Minnesota 40 usi.ng Finance Agency Home improvement Grant .funds for implementation within the City of Shorewood. WHEREAS, the City of Shorewood desires to assist low income homeowners in making repairs to their homes for the of correcting defects. affecting directly the-safety, Habitability, or energy usage of the property; and WHEREAS, the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency has funds to be used.for such purposes, and will accept application from coon -, ties desiring to, administer these Home Improvement Grant Program funds BE IT RESOLVED, that Hennepin County, I #aereby requested 'to include' the City 'of Shorewood in an application .for .Mf nnesota Housing Finance Agency Home. Improvement Grant. PrograaW funds, and upnr�.apprpVal 'of such applicatior�f. the City ar�d Count ::`roil enter 3lilt ..aA aE operating the- :prdga�am �+ tthf ��� ClIt ,Y r f " i ( {d v� fF�r S j ,r MAYOR Steven Frazier COUNCIL William Keeler Robert Naegele, Jr, Jan Haugen James Heiland CLERK-ADMINISTRATOR CITY OF Elsa Wiltsey SHOREWOOD 20630 MANOR ROAD * SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 • (f 12) 474-3236 April 25, 1979 Mr. E. E. Strickland 5935 Christmas Lake Road Shorewood, Mn. 55331 try Dear Mr. etrickland: Enclosed please Lind copies of the RESOLUTION NO. 25-79 approving 40 the division of your property. The certified copy is to be tiled with Hennepin County when tiling your property division. CITY OF SHOREWOOD Elsa I. Wiltsey, Clerk EIW: rd Enc. 4 Z 'S C: % -4 A Residential Community on takAfianetonka's South Shore RESOWTION NO. 25 -79 RESOLVED, that the Council of the City of Shorewood does hereby approve the division of property presently owned by E. E. Strickland = Plat 34400 - Parcel 4800 PID 35- 117 -23 -42 -0015 into two parcels shown on the survey prepared by Schoell & Madson, Inc. dated February 15, 1979. Parcel A: That part of Lot 185, Auditor's Subdivision Number One Hundred and Twenty, which lies westerly of a line drawn parallel with the west lite of said lot 185 from a point on the south line of said Lot 185 distant 434.70 feet easterly front the southwest corner of said lot 185. Parcel B: That part of Lot 185, Auditor's Subdivision Number One Hundred and Twenty, which lies easterly of a line drawn parallel.with the west line of said lot 185 from a point on the south line of said Lot 185 distant 434.70 feet easterly from the southwest corner of said Lot 185. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Shorewood, this 26th day of March, 1979 Mayor Attest: Elsa I. Wiltsey, Clerk /Admin. Christmas Lake Denial Resolution • • RESOLUTION NO. WHEREAS, Lot 11, Radisson Inn Addition, is a riparian lot bordering upon Christmas Lake and is owned in fee by T. Gerald Hayes and his wife, and WHEREAS, said property is.reg.istered under the torrens system and the property is subject to an easement for access to the swimming beach on Lot 11 for the benefit of the owners of other lots in Radisson Inn Addition, and WHEREAS, there is presently constructed on Lot 11 a dock, which dock has been built by owners of lots in Radisson Inn Addition and is used by them for swimming purposes as well as for getting on and off boats; in addition there is a raft which is anchored within the side lot lines extended into the water, which raft is used for docking of boats belonging to persons owning lots in Radisson Inn Addition, and WHEREAS, the fee of the dock and raft on of his property, and owner of Lot 11 objects` to the location his property and in the water in front WHEREAS, there -is no_house constructed on Lot 11 and the City Council of the City of Shorewood has not issued a permit for the construction of said dock or floating raft as provided by Shorewood Ordinance No. 77, Section 11, subd. 7, and WHEREAS, the owners of lots in Radisson Inn Addition have filed a written request for a permit to locate the floating raft and dock as hereinbefore described, which dock would not exceed 100 feet in length and would be used for swimming, bathing, sunbathing, getting on and off boats, but not be used for water skiing or docking of boats; the dock would be located approximately 45 feet from the west line of the lot; in addition there would be a floating raft at which a boat or boats would be docked and which boats would belong to owners of property in Radisson Inn Addition entitled to.the easement of access to the swimming beach. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Shorewood: 1. A permit to construct said dock on Lot 11 as requested by the Radisson Inn Addition residents, represented by Gale M. Johnson, as well as the location and docking of a floating raft as hereinabove described be and hereby is denied. Said structures shall - forthwith be removed from the. premises. Approval Resolution RESOLUTION NO. WHEREAS, Lot 11, Radisson Inn Addition, is a riparian lot bordering upon Christmas Lake and is owned in fee by T. Gerald Hayes and his wife, and WHEREAS, said property is: registered under the torrens system and the property is subject to an easement for access to the swimming beach on Lot 11 for the benefit of the owners of other lots in Radisson Inn Addition, and WHEREAS, there is presently constructed on Lot 11, a dock, which dock has been built by owners of lots in Radisson Inn Addition and is used by them for swimming purposes as well as for getting on and off boats; in addition there is a raft which is anchored within the side lot lines extended into the water, which raft is used for docking of boats belonging to persons owning lots in Radisson Inn Addition, and WHEREAS, the fee owner of Lot 11 objects to the location of the dock and raft on his property and in the water in front of his property, and WHEREAS, there is no house constructed on Lot 11 and the City Council of the City of Shorewood has not issued a permit for the construction of said dock or floating raft as provided by Shorewood Ordinance No. 77, Section 11, subd. 7, and WHEREAS, the owners of lots in Radisson Inn Addition have filed a written request for a permit to locate the floating raft and dock as hereinbefore described, which dock would not exceed 100 feet in length and would be used for swimming, bathing, sunbathing, getting on and off boats., but not be used for water skiing or docking of boats; the dock would be located approximately 45 feet from the west line of the lot; in addition there would be a floating raft at which a boat or boats would be docked and which boats would belong to owners of property in Radisson Inn Addition entitled to the easement of access to the swimming beach. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Shorewood: 1. A permit to construct said dock on Lot 11 as requested by the Radisson Inn Addition residents, represented by Gale M. Johnson, as well as the location of and docking of a floating raft as hereinabove described be issued provided the following conditions are met: • a. The dock shall be used for swimming purposes only; no water skiing from the dock to occur; no boat shall be tied or moored to the floating raft. .s -2- is b. A liability insurance policy in the amount of $300,000 holding the City of Shorewood and the fee owner of Lot 11 harm- less resulting from any accidents which may occur by use of said structures is filed with the City Clerk - Administrator on or before July 30, 1977. c. In the event the insurance policy as provided herein is not filed within the time specified, no permit shall issue and the structures forthwith removed from the premises and the water. • • z �.RESOLU 6i 7 RESOLUT NO. A RESOLUTION ADDRESSED TO THE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS�.IN RESPECT TO THE NAYSMITH-TOWNSEND RESIDENCE HALL FOR NURSES AT THE GLEN LAKE SANITARIUM WHEREAS, the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners did approve the eventual demolition of the Naysmith-Townsend Residence Hall for nurses at the Glen Lake Sanitarium Complex, and WHEREAS, the City Council has been informed that it has been determined by certain studies that said building is structurally sound and in good condition, and WHEREAS, the City Council verily believes that said building represents a potentially viable site for the location of various state, county, or local programs and services, and WHEREAS, the City Council further believes that proper consider- ation of the merits of such building was not given by the County Board of Commissioners prior to its decision to approve of the demolition of such building and the City Council deems it proper and in the public interest and for a public purpose to request the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners to reconsider the demolition of said building: NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MINNETONKA THAT the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners be and hereby are urged to reconsider their approval of the demolition of such building and further urges the Board to make additional studies In respect to the potential use of such building and directs the City Staff to assist the County in such d studies. ­`A peed by the City Council Cy %_ of t of Decerrb tr, 1975. ATTESTr' ity of Minnetonka this 15th day Ma.Waret E. Mullen, City Clerk Vic. Z J Action on the above resolution: Motion for adoption:_ Higuchi Seconded by: Larsen Voted in favor of Renneke, Shaw, DeGhetto, Higuchi, Larsen, Hanus, Bailey Voted against or abstain ed Resolution adopted,. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of a resolution adopted by the City Council of the City of Minnetonka at a duly authorized meeting held on the 15th day of December, 1975— MarAkLret E. Mullen, City Clerk "I V ,Nxft RESOLUTION NO. i WHEREAS, pursuant to the requirements of the Shorewood Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances, the City Council reviewed and considered the application of Boulder Bridge Farm, Inc. for approval of the plat of Boulder Bridge Farm, and for a P.U.R.D., and has given prelimi- nary approval therefor, and WHEREAS, submission of the final plat has been delayed by admin- istrative proceedings before the Department of Natural Resources wherein Boulder Bridge Farm, Inc. has sought permits to allow dredg- ing in a part of the waters of Lake Minnetonka immediately adjacent to the proposed development, and WHEREAS, the securing of the said permits is integral to the overall plan for development of Boulder Bridge Farm, and WHEREAS, the delay in the issuance of the necessary permits has occurred as a consequence of administrative hearings required to de- termine the propriety of granting the permits, and WHEREAS, the delay has been beyond the control of Boulder Bridge Farm, Inc., and WHEREAS, the Hearing Examiner appointed by the Commissioner of Natural Resources did, on December 11, 1979, enter his Findings of • Fact, Conclusions and Recommendation to the Commissioner that the permits sought be issued and, irrespective of whether the Commissioner issues said permits or not, any party to the proceeding aggrieved by the Commissioner's determination may seek judicial review thereof which, if exercised, will produce additional delay and uncertainty as to the ultimate issuance of the said permits, NOW, THEREFORE, of Shorewood that it tional period of six approval so that the the permit proceedin, Resources. BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City does grant to Boulder Bridge Farm, Inc. an addi- months within which to submit its final plat for applicant will have an opportunity to conclude ;s originated before the Department of Natural Adopted by the City Council this 17th day of December, 1979. • • RESOLUTION NO. 79 -79 RESOLVED, that the Council of the City of Shorewood hereby approves the division of the West part of Lot 159, Auditor's Subdivision No. 120 (34400- 3700), now P.I.D. 35- 117 -23 -42 -0003, into two parcels, in accordance with the description as shown on the survey, division plat for Denny Mathisen, as revised the 12th day of November, 1979, as follows: Northerly Parcel The North 128.84 feet, as measured at a right angle, of the following described property: All that part of Lot 159 in Auditor's Subdivision No. 120, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at a point on the North line of said Lot, 283 feet East of the Northwest corner thereof, thence South and parallel with the West line of said Lot to the South line of said Lot; thence West along the South line to the Southwest corner of said Lot; thence North along the West line of said Lot to the Northwest corner thereof, thence East along the North line of said Lot to the point of beginning. Southerly Parcel All that part of Lot 159 in Auditor's Sub- division No. 120, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at a point on the North line of said Lot, 283 feet East of the Northwest corner thereof, thence South and parallel with the West line of said Lot to the South line of said Lot; thence West along the South line to the Southwest corner of said Lot; thence North along the West line of said Lot to the Northwest corner thereof, thence East •,_ along the North line of said Lot to the point of beginning, except the North 128.84 feet thereof, as measured at a right angle. Also a strip of land lying within said Lot 159 of a uniform width of 20 feet extending from the above described portion of said Lot 159 Eastwardly to the East line of said Lot 159, the Southern boundary of said 20 strip being identical in location with the South boundary line of said Lot 159. APPROVED by the City Council of the City of Shorewood the 19th day of November, 1979. Mayor Attest: Elsa I. Wiltsey, Clerk dministrator CERTIFICATION STATE OF MINNESOTA) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) I, Elsa I. Wiltsey, duly appointed Clerk /Administrator of the City of Shorewood, Hennepin County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution is a true and correct copy of Resolution No. 79 -79 adopted by the Council of the City of Shorewood and is so recorded in the minutes of a meeting held on the 19th of November, 1979. Dated: Elsa I. Wiltsey, Clerk Administrator 6 0 • RESOLUTION NO. 78 =79 WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes 403 require that each county submit a final 911 plan to the Department of Administration by December 15, 1979 and each county shall have an operational 911 telephone system by December 15, 1982; and WHEREAS, the Hennepin Emergency Communications Organization (HECO) has prepared a final "911 Plan For Hennepin County Board of Commissioners; and WHEREAS, the rules promulgated by the Department of Administration which govern the design and operation of 911 systems in Minnesota require a certification by the county board that the final 911 plan meets the needs of the safety agencies whose services will be available by dialing 911; and WHEREAS, representatives of the City of Shorewood have participated in the development of the final "911 Plan For Hennepin County ". NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED that the City of Shorewood hereby certifies that the final 11 911 Plan For Hennepin County" meets the needs of the safety agencies whose services are available within the City of Shorewood; and IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Shorewood recommends that the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners approve the final 11 911 Plan For Hennepin County" as submitted by HECO. ADOPTED by the City Council of'the City of Shorewood the 5th day of November, 1979. Mayor Attest: 0 Elsa I. Wiltsey, Clerk Administrator W RESOLUTION NO. 76 -79 RESOLVED, that the City Council hereby approves the division of that Subdivision No. 135, Hennepin County Plat 34440 - Parcel 9120 - now known into two parcels, in accordance with August 20, 1979 by Gordon R. Coffin. of the City of Shorewood part of Lot 294, Auditor's Minnesota, formerly as P.I.D. 34- 117 -23 -23 -0001 the attached survey dated FURTHER, said parcels shall be subject to any additional applicable sewer assessments. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Shorewood the 5th day of November, 1979. CERTIFICATION is STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) SS COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) I, Elsa I. Wiltsey City of Shorewood, that the foregoing resolution adopted so recorded in the November, 1979. duly appointed Clerk /Administrator of the Hennepin.County, Minnesota, do hereby certify resolution is a true and correct copy of a by the Council of the City of Shorewood and is minutes of a meeting held on the � th day of ET-§-a I. Wiltsey, C1 k Administrator Dated: October 21, 1980 0 Certificate of Survey for Mieh"l G. Arvidson in Lot ,291x, Auditor's Subdivision No. 135 Hennepin Cmmty, Minnesota !0 AO SPCf 011 3� - //7 23� ax prpwevd /y C' e sfa�Pd 6 y of /is, a,an�r�r LIhP A it 9, j9 oecvinj�rf SE Comte �- -� w� \ �f . 31, 100 \ C C 11.J 8 00 �7 :f /P A, �Liir V Z9 i f porfson is 30 / Line B •- A / /%re 33'Norfi> of 1 C►n 1 � �6 ; � er . n c .rrrunrdfo l /52:56 sd.23 1 1 � 0 9 � / /9A 7" of woy /mr tio.is - _ k- s 73 . ` fi eorefieo/ Evsf �tr''f✓ereT o� f/irs / //!C Of Lo/ I94 surve Selb- y IhOUC/ No. /9 I I d /vision No. /-?S ounfy I certify that this is a true correct representation of a survey of the Leund4kri63 of: A/ That .psrt of Lot 2949 Auditor's Subdivision No. 135, Hemwpin County, Minnesota, lying South of 'a - line 'herefte ter ;ro'f'ert 'tW .J -A * satd• "Line AN being described as follows: Qessesteetng,-a*t , the- Southeast corner of Lot 3, Block 3, Excelsior Park; thence North along the Rest-ii,ne of said Lot 3 a distance of 13 feet to the point of beginning of said "Line A "; thence deflecting right 90 to the Cast line of said Lot 294, and said "Line A" there ending, EZCEPT that part thereof lying East of a line hereinafter referred to as "Line B ", said "Line B" baring described as follows: Conmeneing at the point of, intersection of said "Line A with the West line of said Lot 294; thence East along said "Line A "'a distance of 153,40 feet to the point of beginning of said "Lane B "; thence deflecting right 90 to the South line of said Lot 294, and said "Line B" there ending, and That part of the following - described property: That part of Lot 294, Auditor's Subdivision No. 135, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying South of a line hereinafter referred to as "Line A", said "Line A" being described as follows: Commenc- ing at the Southeast corner Lot 3, Block 3, Excelsior Park; thence North along the East line of said Lot 3 a distance of 13 feet to the point of beginning of said "Line A "; thence deflect - ing'right 90 to the East line''of said Lot 294, and said "Line A" there ending, lying•Eest a line hereinafter teferred to as "Line B ", said "Line B" being described as followsr Commencing at the pointi intersection of said "Line A" with the West line of said Let 294; thence Bast alorMosaid "nine AN a distance of 153.40 feet to the point of beginning of said "Line B "; thence deflecting jjq 9018' to the South Line of said Lot 294, and.soid "Line B" there ending, ttu? location- ©f all exiating ildings thereon. It does not purport to s w er improve U is or encroachments. Scale: 1" = 60' Gordon R. Coffin g. Rio. 6064 Bates 8 - 20 - 79 Alvin R. Rehder Reg. No.13295 o s Iron marker Land Surveyors and Planners Long Lake, Minnesota ;7 L_ • RESOLUTION NO. • WHEREAS, Howards Point Marina, Inc. has filed an application for rezoning of property to come within the terms of Ordinance No. 108, being the lakeshore recreational district, and said application has been reviewed by this council, and the council has found that the application and information contained therein is such that it is not necessary at this time to request further study of the consequences of the proposed development upon the natural environment, public health, safety and welfare, passible enfringement upon public rights to use public water, and any unreasonable enfringement or restriction on the use of existing adjacent residential areas, and WHEREAS, the applicant has met all of the basic requirements of information to be contained in the application as required by Ordinance No. 108. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD, that the application is hereby referred to the planning commission for public hearing and study and report back to this council with specific instructions to include in the report any effectthe re- zoning might have upon the public health, safety and welfare, and public right to use public waters for any unreasonable infringement or re- striction on use of existing adjacent residential areas. RESOLVED FURTHER, that in the event the planning commission shall deem it necessary to have presented to it additional information on environmental assessment of the project, -the applicant shall comply with the request of the planning commission in order that this council will have the benefit of a full and complete report and recommendation on the request. Steve Frazier, Mayor • Attest: sa I. Wiltsey, C - dministrator 0 RESOLUTION NO. 70 79 RESOLVED that the final plat of "Strawberry Gardens," located in the City of Shorewood, described as: the South 1/3 of the Northeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 32., Township 117, Range 23; be and hereby is approved, and the Mayor and Clerk- Administrator are authorized to execute those documents, in behalf of the City of Shorewood, that are required for filing of the plat of record. RESOLVED FURTHER, that it is now the position of the Council that the lots platted in this subdivision not be resubdivided at any time in the future in such a way as to permit such redivided lots to have access onto Strawberry Lane or Cathcart Drive. APPROVED by the City Council of the City of Shorewood the 22nd day of October, 1979. • CERTIFICATION STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) SS. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) I, Elsa I. Wiltsey, duly appointed Clerk /Administrator of the City of Shorewood, Hennepin County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution is a true and correct copy of a resolution adopted by the Council of the City of Shorewood and is so recorded in the minutes of a meeting held on the 22nd day of October, 1979. Dated: October 23, 1979 Elsa I. Wiltsey, Clerk /Administrator RESOLUTION NO. I STATE OF MINNESOTA County of Hennepin) SS. City of Shorewood ) I, Elsa I. Wiltsey, City Clerk of said City of Shorewood hereby certify that the following Resolution was passed by the Council of said City at a duly convened meeting thereof held in said City on October 9, 1979. On motion it was resolved that the following sums of money be raised by tax upon the taxable property'in said City, for the following purposes, for the current year: For General City Purposes, Levy Limit - 257,036 +Base Adjustment 59,680 $316,716. For Liability Insurance 18,133. For Land Planning 10,000. . For Bonded Indebtedness 2,400. For Certificates of Indebtedness 17,640. For Metropolitan Waste Control (debt portion) 29,610. For Commercial Development 733. For Shade Tree Disease Control 32,000. $427,232. And I further certify that I have compared the for going with the original entry of the minutes of proceedings of said Meeting so held 9th of October, 1979, as the same are recorded in the Book of Records of said City, and that the same is a correct transcript therefrom. Given under my hand this 9th day of October A.D., 1979. CitydClerk ff RESOLUTION NO. 64 WHEREAS, this council has previously been informed of the commissioners award in condemnation of the so- called McKinley property and the council has approved the payment of all expenses and costs incurred, as well as its authorization to pay three - fourths of the award so as to allow the city to take possession and control of the property, and WHEREAS, the council has been informed that the respondents, fee owners and contract purchasers of the property, to -wit: Willard T. McKinley, Hazel McKinley, husband and wife, and William T. Kaster and Janice Kaster, husband and wife, have offered to settle and dispose of all matters at issue and waive their right of appeal to the District Court, and WHEREAS, in the opinion of the council it is advantageous to terminate and limit further expenses in this matter. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council of the City of Shorewood does agree to accept as and for a full and complete compromise and termination of the eminent domain action a net payment to the fee owners of the property described as follows: Lots 8 and 9, Block 2, Minnetonka Manor, of $51,000.00 from which the said parties shall pay the current and back real estate taxes, and the City of Shorewood will waive its right to deduct sums for special assessments due in future years; the said $51,000.00 payment is $1,000.00 less than the award of the commissioners but it includes a waiver of ap- proximately $2,300.00 in special assessments. RESOLVED FURTHER, that the city clerk is hereby authorized to pay to the respondents named in said action the sum of $51,000.00 in settlement of the Hennepin County Eminent Domain case No. 1559, and a final certificate be executed and filed of record. . RESOLUTION NO. 61 -79 RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Shorewood hereby approves the replatting of the following property described as: Tract B. Registered Land Survey No. 757, Hennepin County, into a Registered Land Survey Tract A and Tract B. as shown on the survey by Schoell and Madsen, Inc. - dated August 1. 1979. RESOLVED FURTHER, that the Mayor and Clerk- Administrator are authorized to execute the Survey in behalf of the City of Shorewood. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Shorewood the -. 27th day of August, 1979. • CERTIFICATION I, Elsa I. Wiltsey, duly appointed Clerk /Administrator of the City of Shorewood, Hennepin County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution is a true and correct copy of a resolution adopted by the Council of the City of Shorewood and is so recorded in the minutes of a meeting held on the 27th day of August, 1979. Elsa I. Wiltsey, Clerk /Administrator Dated: October 24, 1979 • RESOLUTION NO. 59- 79 WHEREAS, the City of Shorewood has heretofore determined that it was in need of property described as Lots 8 and 9, Block 2, Minnetonka Manor, for use as park land, and they have heretofore authorized the filing of a petition in Hennepin County District Court to obtain title to the property by means of eminent domain, and WHEREAS, Hennepin County District Court Condemnation File No. 1559 did appoint three commissioners to hear testimony as to the value of said property and issue their award therefor, and WHEREAS, testimony has been presented to the commissioners and the commissioners have filed their damage award which is in the amount of $52,000.00 on which shall be paid all special assessments levied by the City of Shorewood against the property, leaving a net due from the City of $49,356.00. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council that the City of Shorewood does accept said award and does instruct the City Clerk to make payment of the same to the fee owner, pro- vided no appeal of the award is taken by the fee owner, and if such appeal is taken, to make payment of three - fourths of the award so that the City may take immediate possession of the property for public park purposes, and that the Clerk pay all fees and expenses of the commissioners and appraisers' fees awarded to William T. Kaster, as well as appeal expenses incurred by the City. . RESOLUTION NO. 58 -79 RESOLVED, that the following shall be deemed to be a policy of the City of Shorewood to be followed in all instances in interpreting ordinances regarding acceptance of roads. No road within the City of Shorewood will be accepted as a public road except under the following conditions: 1. Upon recommendation of the city engineer that the road has been constructed and laid out pursuant to instructions and specifications of the City, the City will take the road over for snowplowing and will plow the road for one season. 2. The road will not be accepted as a public road for maintenance until the road has been used for one complete year and the Council has received a recommendation of the engineer that this road is in good condition and not breaking up or . deteriorating in any way. Upon receipt of such recommendation the Council will consider the resolution accepting the road as a public road for snowplowing and maintenance. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Shorewood the 27th day of August, 1979. Mayor Attest: Elsa I. Wiltsey, Clerk - Administrator t $�a -7/79 0 RESOLUTION NO. RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Shorewood authorizes the Clerk of the City of Shorewood to sign the license in behalf of the City for permission to repair the drain along the railroad right -of -way at the Manitou Crossing, as described in the request. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Shorewood the 9th day of October, 1979. • Elsa I. Wiltsey, Clerk- Administrator • • • RESOLUTION NO. WHEREAS, the City Councils of Eden Prairie, Minnetonka, Shorewood and Chanhassen have been working together to try and solve some of the existing traffic problems as well as the additional traffic that will occur because of developments that are in progress in each of the cities in the area of the Townline Road, and WHEREAS, the Hennepin County Task Force and Staff, advised the County Commissioners that they are not delegating funds for any projects for Townline Road; THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Council of the City of Shorewood supports the resolution presented to the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners by the City of Eden Prairie, and urges the County Board to look favorably upon funding for the CSAH No. 62, Project No. 7419. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Shorewood the 27th day of September, 1979• Dated: Elsa I. Wiltsey Steven B. Frazier Clerk Administrator Mayor U • RESOLUTION NO. WIDI2;A "'S,the Shorewood City Council has previously approved contracts for construction of a City Hall from funds available. HE IT E SOLTED , that the council hereby approves the establishment of a temporary fund for "City Hall Construction" and that the Clerk - Treasurer be authorized to permanently transfer certain funds amounting to $50,000 into the "City Hall Construction Fund" as follows: $10,000 from Liquor Funds $25,000 from Utility Operating Funds $15,000 from Federal Revenue Sharing Funds ADOPTED by the council the 13th day of August, 1979• CERTIFICATION STATE OF KINN SOTA) SS COUNTY OF IEPINFPIN) I, Elsa I. Wiltsey, being the duly qualifier) and acting Clerk - Administrator of the City of Shorewood, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was adopted by the City Council of the City of Shorewood, Minnesota, at a regular meeting thereof held on the 30th day of July, 1979. Elsa I. Wiltsey Clerk - Administrator • RESOLUTION NO. 5 I-ITI:REAS, the City of Shorewood and the County of Hennepin have a Joint Cooperation Agreement in effect for the use of Community Development Block Grant funds from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development; and WH Pu AS, both parties wish to terminate that agreement and replace it with a new Joint Cooperation Agreement, County Contract No. 90470; B]1" IT a SOLVrED, that the current agreement with the County of Hennepin be terminated effective September 30, 1979, and a new agreement with the County of Hennepin, County Contract No. 90470 be implemented effective October 1, 1979; and the Mayor and the Clerk be authorized to execute the agreement, on behalf of the city. ADOP`PED by the City Council the 13th day of August, 1979. C] CERTIFICATION STATE OF NINNLSOTA) SS COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) I, Elsa I. 'ililtsey, being - the duly qualified and acting Clerk - Administrator of the City of Shorewood, do hereby certify that - the foregoing resolution was adopted by the City Council of the City of Shorewood, Minnesota, at a regular meeting thereof held on the 13th day of Au:gust 1979« Elsa I. luiltsey Clerk - Administrator • A RESOLUTION SUPPORTING THE DEVELOPMENT OF A CAA FOR SUBURBAN AND RURAL HENNEPIN COUNTY WHEREAS, the question of whether there is a need for a CAA to serve suburban and rural Hennepin County, and what organi- zational form is most appropriate if a CAA should be esta- blished, has been under study for the past year, and WHEREAS, this review has indicated that the County's lower income citizens will benefit from the establishment of a CAA that can build on and complement the activities of the existing Human Service Councils, and WHEREAS, a task force representing the three Human Service Councils has developed an organizational model designated the "Link- age Model ", which will enable a CAA to be organized while retaining the Human Service Councils and making the fullest use of their existing planning, management and service capa- bilities, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the SAorewood _ _ Cit Council does hereby urge the Hennepin County Board of Com- missioners to accept the recommendations of the task force and establish a CAA for suburban and rural Hennepin based on the "Linkage Model" and to designate the present task force as the interim board to: write the by -laws, organize the new board, and apply for funding. Adopted this /O 7ol day of per+ ,hr",*r1979. Signed i • weft hennepin human iervicei planning board LJ 4100 vernon avenue south, it. louii park, minnetota 55416 Wait hennepin 920 -5553 human August 10, 1979 lervlcel RECEIVED AUG 13 1979 Elsa Wiltsey, Clerk Shorewood City Hall 10630 Manor Road Shorewood, MN. 55331 Dear Ms. Wiltsey: • During the past year there has been much discussion and study at the state, county and local levels about the establishment of a CAA in suburban Hennepin County. On June 5th, the Hennepin County Board passed two resolutions regarding a suburban CAA: (1) to approve in concept the establishment of a CAA; and (2) to direct the Suburban Human Services Councils to develop a model for the CAA, and return it to the County Board for their approval early this fall. The Human Services Councils were further dir- ected to seek participation of area human services agencies, community groups and low - income residents, and also to seek municipal support for the model. A Task Force composed of persons representing the munici- palities, human services councils and representatives of the poor from the three suburban planning areas has been working to carry out the above directive. We have prepared the attached resolution to be presented to your City Council by August 20th, or shortly thereafter. We are also including an information packet containing: 1. Mission Statement for CAA 2. Minnesota State Plan for Counties without CAA's 3. The Model that has been developed by the Task Force 4. Statement of Need • • -2- We will be contacting you soon to find out when this resolution can be scheduled for presentation. A member of the Task Force could be present at the meeting to answer any questions the Council might have. Sincerely, Patti Betlach Chairperson, WHHS Board • • 1 f� • MINNESOTA STATE PLAN FOR COUNTIES WITHOUT C ACTION AGENCIES About 10% of the poor in Minnesota, estimated to be almost 42, "000 people in 1978, live in six counties which do not have Community Action Programs. A consortium of Community Action Agc.icies which are contiguous to, and provide some services in these counties have joined with the Office of Economic Opportunity, Minnesota Department. of Economic Security, in sponsoring a study to determine the feasibility of designating these counties as participants in Community Action Agencies. Designation as a Community Action Agency participant, which can occur upon request of the County Board of Commissioners, and recognition of CSA, Region V, allows the full resources of the Community Action Program to be brought to operate in the interest of the poor residents of these counties. A feasibility study was completed in November., 1978. It identified the needs of people. in the six counties, the services that are available to 'meet those needs, and the problems that exist where services fail to meet needs. (Attachment A) The study was distributed to each of the counties and discussions were held with Human Service Boards, full boards of county commissioners, and other interested groups of people. One county, Washington County, did not wish to move any further with the study, but the other five have been working with it and are in various stages of development. Hennepin County accepted the study and.passed a resolution that their Office of Planning and Development study it further and bring back 'to the County Board their recommenda- tion. On May 31, 1979 the Office of Planning and Development submitted their recommenda- tions to the County Commissioners Ways and Means Committee. (Attachment B) The recommendations progressed to full board on June 5, and two resolutions were passed at that time. 1) to recommend concept approval of a Community Action Agency to serve suburban Hennepin County. and 2) to recommend the Suburban Human Services Councils develop a model for such a Community Action Agency and return it to the Board by September 1, 1979; for final approval and designation. (Attachment C) Olmsted County Board of Commissioners met on May 1, 1979, and discussed the feasibility of establishing a Community Action Agency. They are still grappling with organizational and administrative issues and assigned the Assistant County Administrator for Human Services to study these issues and return to them with pertinent information. Dakota County will study Community Action in depth in September through their Human Service Advisory Committee. When.this study is completed they will move their consid- eration to the Human Service Board. (County Commissioners) Freeborn & Mower County have reviewed the study and have expressed an interest, instruct- ing their Welfare Directors to report to them on the possibilities of forming a CAA. It is estimated that the progress of each county will move according to the schedule outlined in table 1. with Community Action Program designations ranging from November,. 1979 to May, 1980. STATEMENT 0 There is a need for a Community Action Agency in Suburban Hennepin County because: - there is not accessibility to currently available services - there is a lack of knowledge about available services - many agencies in the area are underfunded and are not able to meet the needs - many people do not use servvices available to them because of pride and could be educated about using services through a C. A. A. - there are gaps in services available - there is a substantial number (25,000) of poor and near poor people who would live in suburban Hennepin County and could benefit from the services of a Community Action Agency - there is a large number of poor people who are not visible in our communities because there are not concentrated is geographic "pockets of poverty" — there is not a group or organization which can speak to the needs of poor people in suburban Hennepin County, and because: - a Community Action Agency could improve access - identify people who are poor - further clarify needs - involve people who would benefit in the development and implementation of programs - work on the prevention of negative effects of needs being unmet or ignored - could add to the resources of currently underfunded services 0 wait bassoon boamis semices o0selaq , 4100 we mio "wave 000th A. left$ P*#k# a We'd PARTICULAR CONCERNS FOR LOW INCOME RESIDENTS OF, SUBURBAN AND RURAL HENNEPIN COUNTY HOW A COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY COULD-IAD, THESE CONCERNS 1 LACK OF COORDINATION OF cERViCES; LACK OF KNOWLEDGE 0 EXISTING , SERVICES; NO CONCENTRATED FOCUS ON LOW INCOME PROBLEMS: Although multiple services exist to serve suburban a•nd rural roasidents,', a great many poor people do not know what is available or how :to get needed assistance. In the first` four months of 1979, Community Emergency Assistance Programs (CEAP) in Brooklyn Center saw,. 12'96 lo -, ,- ncome clients; 174 of these had never had any contact wit ' h community-.. based services and at that time were receiving no care. or services of any kind. The problem is worse in more isolated.rural parts'of the county; Emergency Energy volunteers saw many clienta wit'hl,health housing, and other needs but had no idea of where or how to apply. The poor in suburban Hennepin tend to be isolated, elder'lyj anAi unused to social service systems. A Community Action Agency could: * most importantly, prepare a comprehensive needs assessment to. determine the most crucial problems facin g 16W income people and devel6p prioritized strategies for combatting tho prob,,le,ms. * be central coordinating agency and resource center for low i Ccr,-ae residents, and a place where people M,la F;come, act Ivet 7 involved in programs affecting them. * provide outreach,, advocacy, and follow -up throughout the area, , jisiting residents, asssis�ting them with problems and Concerns, providLrig them w ith local programs to get involved in (for example, outreach workers could explain to a homebo'und elderly person now to apply for M -edir.are benefits As well . .as $et them home repair services or delivered hot meal--). II. TRANSPORTATION AND ACCESS TO SERVICES Lack of transportation and resulting isolation are key problems in suburban and rural Hennepin County. There is little or! no bus service; people on fixed incomes can't afford cabs and often don't have cars, and distances are too far to walk. A Community Action Agency could: * mobilize local churches and civic organizations to provide volunteer transportation systems, car pools, etc. * provide regular help in getting people to services * advocate for greater decentralization for area residents' benefit. provide outreach workers to visit isolated elderly, and home -bound residents III. ISOLATION, SSENSE OF COMMUNITY, AND SELF -HELP A problem related directly to the lack of adequate transportation is the. isolation and sense of helplessness people experience living alone, in-poverty. (The stigma and shame attached to being poor are strong • in suburban Hennepin County.) Community Action Agencies work to bring these people together, develop a sense of community, and help people help themselves. A Community Action Agency could: * through outreach and referral, get people in touch with needed services and w each other * through providing better transportation, arrange for seniors and neighbors to get together socially and for projects such as community gardens * start senior volunteer programs for minor home repair, help with household chores, etc. * help stars: food co-ops, community hardens, open air markets * help start support groups for single parents or other groups in the community. * through such programs, develop leadership skills and a seno;e of pride and belonging to replace stigma, shame and isolation. • IV. INADEQUATE HOUSING A large number of suburban Hennepin poor people live in homes that they own but that are substandard, in extreme need of repair which they cannot afford. In home visits for the emergency energy program, we saw leaking roofs,, flooding basements, broken windows, no or inadequate insulation. A Community Action Agency could: * provide winterization erograms for insulation and storm windows. +� provide repair services to bring houses up to code. * provide emergency energy assistance in home communities to 'assist with high fuel costs. * he people learn basic skills of home repair and get , them in touch with community resources such as low interest loans. V. HEALTH AND NUTRITION NEEDS Inadequate nutrition and health often intensify poor people's problems because they make it more difficult for people to work at optimum levels and provide for their daily needs. This problem affects young and old a..lik,e; but children in early developmental stages and elderly residents seem to be most vulnerable. A Community Action Agency could: * provide services such as congregate dining and home deliv meals to seniors where they do not presently exist. * establish nutrition education programs. * help organize well baby and senior prevention clinics * help publicize government and private sector health and nutrition programs. * help organize food shelves and clothing shelves where they do not currently exist * help provide local residents with cheaper nutritious food through food co -ops, community gardens, open air markets. advocate for school feeding programs and provide nutritional supplements tHrough Head Start programs for young: children. VI. SPECIAL NEEDS: CHILDREN; YOUTH; SINGLE PARENTS Some age groups face special problems and needs caused by poverty. Children may benefit from special education and nutrition programs, and from better child care services. Youth may benefit from special youth employment and recreation progratns. Single parents, particularly displar,ed homemakers, can benefit from job counseling, child care improvements, support, groups, and similar services to assist them to `)ecome seif-s after divorce, death of a spouse, or a zimila situaLion. A Community Action Agency could : help provide better, more, and affordable child care and latchkey programs, particularly Head Start _programs, which benefit both. Provide job programs, or outreach and referral to existing programs, especially for youth and women first entering the jol, tri a r - k tl- " . * PVOVII'P youth recreation programs. provide Well baby clinics, nutritional and health classec for young mothers. 0 * organize support groups for single parents and working mothers. VI i - SUMMARY Clearly, a new Community Action Agency could not address all. of t,",e above needs at once. Its initial concern should be tc conduct a car-e1%,1 study of chose needs which are most crucial and affect the mosu people, and develop programs to address critical needs first. Pizrther, a Community Action Agency must take care to avoid duplication and to utilize all available community resources, particularly churches and volunteer organizations in the local areas. Mission Statement The primary objectives of Community Action Agencies {CAA} are. to mobilize and channel the resources of private and public organizations and ihstitutions into anti- poverty action, to increase the opportunities as well as the capabilities for participation of the poor in the planning,, execution, and evaluation of programs affecting their lives, to initiate new and more effective means to the solution of poverty problems, and to strengthen communications and mutual understanding in the planning and coordination of anti - poverty programs in the CAA service area. These objectives will be discussed in detail to more clearly define the role of Community Action Agencies as society's number one anti - poverty organization. 1. Mobilizing and channeling resources into anti - poverty action -- Community Action Agencies have been established to serve the poor by assisting in the development of all programs possible and needed for each agency's service area. The idea behind developing a more useful utilization of resources for anti - poverty programming throughout the country is not to provide monetary handouts to all low income people but to Increase their chances of becoming economically independent, thus reducing the actual number of low income people in the country. 2. Encourage participation of the poor- -One of the major goals of the Community. Action Agency is to provide the opportunity for poor people to structure their own development toward becoming economically independent. The basic idea behind this goal is that low income people must be given the opportunity to shape (heir own destiny, although some guidance is required to make this development as easy as possible. All programming efforts of the Community Action Agency at some time in the planning process include input from the service area's low income population. Low income; individuals participate in all administrative functions of the CAA 3. Develop innovative anti- poverty programming -- Community Action Agencies have been given the responsibility to discover new methods of anti - poverty programming and implementing such programming when possible. The Community Action Agency is unique in the fact that it is one i of the few government agencies that deals directly with the people at a local level. Because of the CAA's_ proven ability to deal on a one -to -one basis with low income people they can more ea::ily adapt the service area's population to new programming. Community Action Agencies over the years have become one of the best organizations at researching and implementing innovative programs aimed at the reduction of poverty throughout the United States. 4. Develop a coordinated effort to deal with problems related to poverty- -The fact that Community Action Agencies at times become a sounding board for all the problems associated with anti - poverty programming only strengthens its role as advocate to the poor. Community Action Agencies have taken on the responsibility of defending, each person's right to utilize the services provided by the government in the manner they were meant to be used. Any discrepancy in the way the government services are delivered versus the way they should be delivered becomes one of the more important principles behind the well- established communications network developed by each CAA. This communication network Is often used, but not only to defend the rights of the low income person but to mutually develop anti- poverty programs and simply share information and ideas concerning the low income sector of our population. It becomes increasingly apparent that not only does a Community Action Agency mobilize private and public resources, encourage participation from low -income individuals, develop and implement innovative programs and help coordinate all anti- poverty programming in the agency's geographic service area; it provides all people, not only tow income people, with some kind of voice in the bureaucracy of government. Although this mission statement more clearly defines the role of the Community Action Agency, it does not cover everything. Community Action is a continuing ongoing program that expands to meet the needs as they arise. Minnesota Poverty Policy The State of Minnesota is committed to the principle that all citizens are entitled to participate in the quality of life so often attributed to this State. The Office of the Governor and all State Departments and Agencies will serve as a positive force to eliminate social and economic barriers and to provide opportunities for the poor and disadvantaged to pursue and enjoy self - sufficiency and self- determination. t This quality of life goal means that the poor and disadvantaged citizens will have- - - -the opportunity to obtain an education and to develop career skills; Jrsr -the opportunity to choose work at the prevailing wage and to have an adequate- annual income; - access to adequate housing, energy sources, health care and food supply; -the guarantee of human and individual rights. The State shall establish policies which will encourage the private sector, local units of government and all citizens to commit resources and actively participate in the elimination of poverty in Minnesota. F • 0 RESOLUTION NO. J -- WHEREAS, the Pflaumwell Development Partnership has hereto- fore filed with the City Clerk a request for a P.U.R.D. in the City of Shorewood upon property described as follows: Government Lot 5, Government Lot 6, Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter, that part of the Northeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter lying Southerly of the center line of the Town Road, all in Section 36, Township 117 Range 23, in the City of Shorewood, Minnesota to be known as Near Mountain, and has paid the required fee at the time of filing, and WHEREAS, the publication of Notice of Hearing on the P.U.R.D. was published on they �a and 1 277 in the official newspaper of the City of Shorewood, t e Maverick, • and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Shorewood did hold a public hearing on the preliminary plan for the Near Mountain P.U.R.D and the Planning Commission did have the opportunity to review the said plan as proposed, including the preliminary plan, the location map, the boundary sketch, the phasing plan, city sanitary sewer and municipal water main systems, together with the deep well site to serve the area, the storm sewer and drainage plan, together with other data including traffic studies and access to the properties, and WHEREAS, the developers propose to construct in the project single family dwellings, town houses and condominiums at a density of not more than two dwelling units per 40,000 square feet of useable site acreage (city defined wetlands to be excluded from such computations), and • 0 • U • WHEREAS, said tract contains 166 acres located adjacent to Silver Lake on rolling hills in the R -1 zoning district of the City of Shorewood, and does contain not more than 40 acres of wetlands area as defined by the city wetlands ordinance; and WHEREAS, said tract has unusual physical features of ecological value which demand that the nature area of the tract be preserved and the physical and terrain features of the property require it be developed in accordance with a P.U.R.D. plan to conserve and protect the natural beauty of the tract, and WHEREAS, the applicant has shown to the Planning Commission and to the City Council that the construction of 274 dwelling units of a mixture of detached, semi - detached, attached, and multiple storied structures would not have an undue and adverse impact on existing public facilities nor upon the reasonable enjoyment of neighboring property, and • WHEREAS, the City Council has had the benefit f the favor- able recommendation of the Planni g Commission and the information presented to it by the developers and residents of the neighborhood. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Shorewood that the P.U.R.D. preliminary plat of the property herein described as presented to the Shorewood Council by the Pflaumwell Development Partnership is hereby given preliminary approval; that the City Council does find the amount and location of common open spaces, including wetlands, which shall not be considered for density purposes, and flood plains are consistent with the stated purposes and intentions of the Shorewood zoning ordinance Section 27, and that such open spaces and wetlands have been properly labeled on the preliminary plan as submitted. RESOLVED FURTHER, that the city attorney, together with the city engineer and city planner, develop a development plan for the project which shall, among other things, include: • IM • 1. Staging of construction 2. Plans for sewer, water, natural gas, telephone, lights and cable T.V., if available, to be installed in the public streets and street construction, plans for a well to serve the project, pro- vision for cash park payment as per ordinance and performance bonds or similar assurances to guarantee that the project will be com- pleted, location of the buildings on the lots which are proposed to be platted the first stage, plans for the storm drain system, easements for open space running in favor of the city, proposed covenants, easements and other provisions relating to location and density or residential units, method of handling development of construction stages beyond stage one, including reasonable time limit on construction of each stage and completion of the entire project, and other provisions which the members of the Shorewood staff deem appropriate for review and consideration by this council as called for in Section 27 of the zoning ordinance. RESOLVED FURTHER, that said final plan together with the final plat be returned to this council for its review within 90 days of the date of this resolution for further action by this council but only after prior review by the planning commission as provided for by ordinance. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD by four - fifths vote this �Q74 day of _�,cc� , 1979. • ATTEST: rk minis ra or Mayor -3- • RESOLUTION NO. � WHEREAS, on the 11th day of May, 1979 the City of Shorewood entered a Contract for Deed with Stefan F. Freeman and Audrey M. Freeman to purchase property, legally described as set forth in the attached Exhibit A, and identified for tax purposes as District 26, Plat 34420, Parcel 4005, and WHEREAS, the City did agree to purchase such property subject to outstanding, unpaid and delinquent real estate taxes and special assessments assessed in the year 1973 and all years subsequent thereto, and WHEREAS, the sellers, Stefan F. Freeman and Audrey M. Free- man, conditioned said contract upon the restriction that the property shall in perpetuity be used for public park purposes by the City of Shorewood, and WHEREAS, as a consequence of such restriction, the property will not be developed or subdivided for residential or commercial • purposes so long as owned by the City, and special assessments for sanitary sewer levied by the City against said property are not now pertinent and in proportion to the uses to which the property may navbe put, and WHEREAS, the property is presently subject to proceedings for forfeiture by reason of the delinquencies for unpaid real estate taxes and installments of said special assessments, and WHEREAS, the City has requested an abatement of all back taxes due and payable on said property. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Shorewood, Minnesota: 1. That the special assessments for sanitary sewer on said property are hereby cancelled and the City does hereby waive and forgive past delinquent installments of said special assessments, together with interest and penalty thereon, for 1973 and all years subsequent thereto. 2. That the City of Shorewood does hereby request the Hennepin County Finance Director to remove said delinquencies for such years and delete the same as an element of such tax forfeiture proceedings as are in process. 3 . That the Mayor and Clerk - Administrator are further authorized to enter3a contract with Hennepin County to confess judgment for the amount of delinquent and unpaid general real estate taxes on said property, interest and penalty, for 1973 and all years subsequent thereto, and to agree to pay such amount in ten equal annual installments, in the event Hennepin County refuses to abate said delinquent general real estate taxes. L 4. That the Clerk - Administrator is instructed to forward a copy of this resolution -to the Hennepin County Finance Direc- tor for appropriate action in accordance herewith. ADOPTED by the City Council this 3 0 day of 1979. CERTIFICATION STATE OF MINNESOTA) SS • COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) I, Elsa I. Wiltsey, being the duly qualified and acting Clerk - Administrator of the City of Shorewood, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was adopted by the City Council of the City of Shorewood Minnesota, at a regular meeting thereof held on the day of , 1979. a I. Wiltsey Clerk - Administrator 0 EXHIBIT A • Lot 20 and that part of Lot 21 lying North of the South line of the abandoned Great Northern Railway right of way Meeker's Outlots to Excelsior also known as Lot 75, Auditor's Subdivision Number One Hundred Thirty -Three (133) Hennepin County Minnesota and All that part of the Northeast 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 32, Township 117, Range 23, lying Southeasterly of the Minneapolis $k St. Louis Railroad right of way, except the following described property:- Begin - ning at the Northeast corner of the said Northeast 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4; thence West along the North line thereof to the Southerly Tine of the Minneapolis & St. Louis Railroad right of way; thence Southwesterly along the Southerly line of said right of way 354.2 feet mope or less to a point; thence Easterly on a line parallel to and distant 230 feet from the Northerly line of said quarter section and to the Easterly ;line of said quarter section; thence Northerly along; said Easterly line:of said quarter section to the point of beginning. Also all of Lot 13 Meeker's Outlots to Excelsior. Also all that part of the Northwest 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 32, Township 117, Range 23, lying Southeasterly of the Minneapolis & St. Louis Railroad right of way, containing 10.93 • acres, also a strip of land described as follows: Beginning at the North- east corner of the Southwest 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of said Section 32; thence West on the quarter quarter section line 1059.6 feet, more or less, to the Southeasterly boundary line of the Minneapolis and St. Louis Rail- road right of way; thence South 48 degrees and 51 minutes West along said Southeasterly boundary line of said right of way 157 feet; thence East parallel with the South line of said quarter section 1177 feet, more or less, to the East line of said Southwest 1/4 of said Southeast 1/4 of said Section; thence North 103.1 feet, more or less, to the place of beginning, containing 2.88 acres. Wherever the Right of Way of the said Minneapolis & St. Louis Railroad Company is used as a boundary line in this conveyance, it is the intention of the parties hereto to convey to the center of, but subject to said Railroad Right of Way, so that in case of vacation or abandonment of said Railroad Right of Way, the fee thereto shall inure to the benefit of the grantees herein, their heirs and assigns. The above is now described as part of Lot 64, Auditor's Subdivision 133, Hennepin County, Minnesota. • RESOLUTION NO. 52 -79 • RESOLVED, that the Council of the City of Shorewood hereby requests conveyance of title to the City of Shore ood of the follow— ing described tax forfeited lands for pu lic use purposes as follows: 11 Outlot 1 — Amlee Acres Plat 34345, Parcel 7500 PID: #33- 117 -23 -12 -0019 to be used for storm water drainage. 21 Outlot 1 — Tonka View Addition Plat 35553, Parcel 9000 PID: #31= 117 -23 -14 -0015 to be used for wetlands and wildlife preservation. RESOLVED, further that the following described parcels are approved for Public Sale and that the special assessments listed for each parcel may be reassessed after the property is returned to private ownership: Plat 34325, Parcel 2000 PID #25- 117 -23 -31 -0001 $1,813.00 Plat 34420, Parcel 4660 PID #32- 117 -23 -12 -0010 2,302.00 Plat 35240, Parcel 1225 PID #26- 117 -23 -41 -0020 2,009.00 Adopted by the City Council of the CITY OF SHOREWOOD this 16th day of July, 1979. ------------------------------------ Elsa I. Wiltsey, Clerk /Administrator • RESOLUTION NO. RESOLVED, that in the event the Svoboda is subdivided a wider access to the provided by the servi the necessary footage 51 -79 property belonging to Frank and that subdivision requires public street than currently ce road, the City will dedicate from Lot 279. Adopted by the City Council of the CITY OF SHOREWOOD, this 16th day of July, 1979. >r CERTIFICATION STATE OF MINNESOTA] ss COUNTY OF HENNEPIN] I, Elsa I. Wiltsey, being the duly qualified and acting Clerk/ Administrator for the City of Shorewood, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was adopted by the City Council of the City of Shorewood, Minnesota, at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 16th day of July, 1979. Elsa I. Wiltsey, Clerk /Administrator C. • RESOLUTION N0.49 -79 RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Shorewood, Hennepin County, State of Minnesota, hereby approves the division of the Richard E. Lapping property described as: Lot 5, Holtmere Addition, Lake Minnetonka., Plat 35040 (Property Identification No. 25- 117 -23 -22 -0005) into two parcels: West parcel to contain the west 210 feet of Lot 5; East parcel to contain that part of Lot 5 which lies east of the west 210 feet thereof. FURTHER, that any building permit requested be approved by the City Engineer. ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Shorewood, Hennepin County, State of Minnesota, this 25th day of June, 1979. Elsa I. Wiltsey, Clerk- Administrator RESOLUTION NO. 48 -79 RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Shorewood hereby approves the division of Plat 34340, Parcel 3510 — PID #34- 117 -23 -42 -0024 into two parcels as originally platted: Lot 202 — Auditors Subdivision No. 135 and Lot 59 — Academy Addition Adopted by the City Council of the City of Shorewood, this 25th day of June, 1979 0 CERTIFICATION STATE OF MINNESOTA] ] ss COUNTY OF HENNEPIN] I, Elsa I. Wiltsey, being the duly qualified and acting Clerk /Administrator of the City of Shorewood, do'hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was adopted by the City Council of the City of Shorewood, Minnesota, at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 25th day of June, 1979. I. Wiltsey, Cle /Administrator 0 • RESOLUTION N0. 45 -79 0 WHEREAS, application has been made by the current property owner of Lot 296, Auditor's Subdivision No. 135 for the construction of a dock upon property described as Part of Lafayette Avenue in plat of Excelsior Park and of Government Lot 1, Section 34, Town- ship 117, Range 23, et al, and WHEREAS, prior owners described herein have previously re- quested permission to build a dock on said property, and it was pointed out that that permit was denied for reasons among others that the property in question is almost entirely located within a roadway of the City of Shorewood. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD that the request to construct a private dock on the property described on the application received May 17, 1979, filed by Rosemary T. Fruehling, be and hereby is denied, for the following reasons: 1. Majority of the property upon which the dock is proposed to be located is within the right -of -way of the City of Shorewood. 2. The balance of the property is not suitable for building of a dwelling. 3. The property outside of the right -of -way is in- sufficient in size to provide parking. 4. It is not in the best interest of the City of Shorewood to grant a special permit for the construction of a dock upon the subject property, upon which is not located a residential dwelling. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Shorewood the Ilth day 0 of June, 1979. Elsa I. Wiltsey, Clerk-Administrator • RESOLUTION NO. 43 -79 ---------------- - - - - -- RESOLVED, that the Council of the City of Shorewood hereby approves the division /combination of the property presently owned by Carlton R. Cronin, 5640 Ridge Road, affecting: Plat #34336, Parcel #3834 and Parcel 3832 P.I.D. #36- 117 -23 -24 -0002 and 0003 to adjust the lot lines between the two parcels as described on the attached survey, dated May 31, 1979. Adopted by the Council of the City of Shorewood, this 11th day of June, 1979. • CERTIFICATION STATE OF MINNESOTA) ss COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) I, Elsa I. Wiltsey, being the duly qualified and acting Clerk/ Administrator of the City of Shorewood, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was adopted by the City Council of the City of Shorewood, Minnesota, at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 11th day of June, 1979. Elsa I. Wiltsey, Clerk /Administrator RESOLUTION NO. 42 -79 --------------- - - - - -- • RESOLVED, that the division of that part of Lot 120, Auditors Subdivision No. 120, Hennepin County (Plat 34400 — Parcel 1071) PID #35- 117 -23 -31 -0024 is hereby approved into Parcel A and Parcel B as described on the attached survey — dated the 1st day of June, 1979. Approved by the City Council of the City of Shorewood, this Dated: June 25, 1979 11th day of June, 1979. CERTIFICATION STATE OF MINNESOTA] ] ss COUNTY OF HENNEPIN] I, Elsa I. Wiltsey, being the duly qualified and acting Clerk /Administrator of the City of Shorewood, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was adopted by the City Council of the City of Shorewood, Minnesota, at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 11th day of June, 1979. a I. 17 ltsey, Clerk dministrator • PT:SOLUTTO! 1d0. -- 4 MiSOLVED, that the Council of the City of Shorewood hereby approves the division combination of Tract C and Tract D, Registered Land Survey N'72, and approves a new Registered Land Survey, platted as Tracts A, B, C and D, thereby creating two nei,-J additional parcels* A DOPTED by the Council of the City of Shore the 21st day of "'ay, 1979- 0 CERTIFICATIO STATE OF T`II'I COUFTjITY OF HEDHIEPIIu 1 Elsa T. ""jiltsey, being the duly qualified and acting Clerll-,- administrator of the City of Shorewood, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was adopted by the Cit Council C� e of the City of Shorewood, 1"innesota at a regular meeting thereof held on the 21st day of I�'ay 1979- Else, I. IVIiltsey Cler'-k—Administrator 40 t o • WHEREAS, the mayor and clerk have.executed. a Contract for Deed pursuant to Resolution No. for the City of.S r+ewood, adopted May 7, 1979, and WHEREAS, said Contract for Deed has been fully.executed by RESOLVED FURTHER, this council does wish to express its apprediation and thanks to Mr. and Mrs. Stefan F. Freeman.for being so willing to deal with the city in the sale of the property to the city for use as a public perk. the sellers and the contract returned for acceptance end approval by this council, and WHEREAS, the council is in receipt of an opinion from the city attorney concerning title and are fully informed as to the condition of taxes due and owing on said property, including -special assessments. NOW WHEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED this council does accept this Contract-for Deed and does forthwith take possession of said property as per the terms of the contract, including the restriction as to the use of the property for park purposes. RESOLTUION # 35 - 79 RESOLVED, that the final plat of the 4 lot division/ combination of plat #34400, parcels 1653, 1700, and 1750, requested by Richard Radde, is hereby approved according to the survey, dated February 26, 1979; to be platted as "RADDE DIVISION ". Adopted by the Council of the City of Shorewood this 7th day of Ma j ,,,� 1 979 • It Mayo Attest: • sa I. Wiltsey, C k • RESOLUTION NO. 34-79 • RESOLVED, that the Council of the City of Shorewood hereby approves the final plat of Smithtown Circle as per plat. Adopted by the Council of the City of Shorewood this 7th day of Mak -, 9 979 • r , •� Mayo Attest: sa I. Wiltsey, C rk • RESOLUTION NO. &.3- 7 RESOLVED, that the Council hereby approves the division of the following described parcels from presently existing tracts: All that part of Lot 15, Auditor's Subdivision No. 354, Hennepin County, Minnesota, which lies westerly of the following described line: Commencing at the most southerly corner of Lot 2, Block 3, Enchanted Park, Lake Minnetonka, Minnesota; thence southerly along the easterly line of Lot 1, Block 3, Enchanted Park, Lake Minnetonka, Minnesota, to the most southerly corner of said Lot 1, said corner being the actual point of beginning of the line to be described; thence northerly deflecting to the right an angle of 163 degrees, 27 min- utes, for a distance of 163.6 feet; thence northeasterly deflecting to the right 42 degrees, 17 minutes, for a distance of 69.74 feet; thence northerly deflecting to the left 20 degrees, 58 minutes, for a distance of 66.45 feet to the northwesterly line of Lot 15 of said Auditor's Subdivision No. 354; thence northeasterly along the northwesterly line of said Lot 15 to the most northerly corner thereof, and there terminating. ALSO, That part of Lot 13, in Auditor's Subdivision Number • 354, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying Northwesterly of a straight line drawn from a point in the South- westerly line of said Lot 13 which point is distant 37 1/2 feet Northwesterly along said Southwesterly lot line from the most Southerly corner of said Lot 13 to a point in the Northeasterly line of said Lot 13, which point is distant 37 1/2 feet North- westerly along said Northeasterly lot line from the most Easterly corner of said Lot 13, and lying South- easterly of the following described line: Commencing at the most Northerly corner of Lot 3, Block 3, En- chanted Park, Lake Minnetonka, Min3a.; thence South- easterly along the Northerly line of Lot 3, a distance of 73.32 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence Northerly a distance of 118.01 feet to a point on the Northeasterly line of Lot 13, Auditor's Subdivision Number 354, Hennepin County, Minnesota, distant 37 1/2 feet Northwesterly along said Northeasterly lot line from the most Easterly corner of said Lot 13 and there terminating, according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the Register of Deeds, in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota. RESOLVED FURTHER, that the Council approves combination of said parcels with that separate tract identified for tax purposes as District 26, Plat 34590, Parcel 6150. ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Shorewood this 9 th day of April, 1979. F1 u CERTIFICATION STATE OF MINNESOTA ) SS. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) I, ELSA I. WILTSEY, being the duly qualified and acting Clerk of the City of Shorewood, Hennepin County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of a Resolution adopted by the Council on the 9 th day of April, 1979. Elsa I. Wi tsey Clerk - Administrator • Date: , 1979. RES0LUT1 ON N0. 29 -79 • WHEREAS: Volunteers of the CITY OF SHOREWOOD are a vital resource in solving some of the human problems that are a consequence of our complex society; and WHEREAS: Volunteers, through their demonstrated concern and commitment to the well -being of others, prove assurance for the continuing high quality of life in SHOREWOOD; and WHEREAS: Volunteers represent all ages, economic, education and ethnic backgrounds; and WHEREAS: Volunteering provides opportunities for personal growth, career exploration and civic contribution for every citizen; and WHEREAS: Recognition should be given to individual volun- teers for their contributions to the health, edu- cation, welfare, recreation and cultural services to the CITY OF SHOREWOOD; NOW THEREFORE: Let it be resolved that the CITY COUNCIL of SHOREWOOD, Minnesota, does hereby proclaim the week of April 22 - 28, 1979 as MINNESOTA VOLUNTEER RECOGNITION WEEK Attest: Adopted by the City Council of the City of Shorewood, this 23rd day of Aril, 1979 Mayor 40 Clerk Administrator R E S O L U T I O N N0. 26 -79 R E S O L V E D, that the final plat of "WOODHAVEN SECOND ADDITION" is hereby approved. Approved by the Council of the City of Shorewood, this 9th day of Apr' 1:979 Mayor • RESOLUTION NO. 25 - RESOLVED, that the Council of the City of Shorewood does hereby approve the division of property presently owned by E. E. Strickland — Plat 34400 — Parcel 4800 PID 35- 117 -23 -42 =0015 into two parcels shown on the survey prepared by Schoell & Madson, Inc. dated February 15, 1979. Parcel A: That part of Lot 185, Auditor's Subdivision Number One Hundred and Twenty, which lies westerly of a line drawn parallel with the west line of said lot 185 from a point on the south line of said Lot 185 distant 434.70 feet easterly from the southwest corner of said lot 185. 40 Parcel B: That part of Lot 185, Auditor's Subdivision Number One Hundred and Twenty, which lies easterly of a line drawn parallel with the west line of said lot 185 from a point on the south line of said Lot 185 distant 434.70 feet easterly from the southwest corner of said Lot 185. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Shorewood, this 26th day of March, 1979 -- A k _� Mayor Attest: 0 Elsa I. Wiltsey, Clerk /Admin. For 80 slips RESOLUTION NO. 24-79 WHEREAS, in March of 1976 Minnetonka Moorings, Inc., made application to the City of Shorewood requesting a conditional use permit to use part of Lot 25, Auditor's Subdivision No. 313, and Lots 288, 297, 304 and part of Lots 305 and 290, in Auditor's Subdivision No. 135, for a yacht club with 125 slips to store sailboats, for game courts such as tennis, the use of a structure located on the property for a clubhouse, and for parking and winter storage of sailboats, and WHEREAS, the property in question is located in the R -1 single family residence district wherein a "yacht club" is a stated conditional use, and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Shorewood held public hearings on the request for the conditional use permit and the City Council did receive the recommendations of the Planning Commission, and WHEREAS, the City Council did itself hold public hearings on the request at which parties desiring to be heard were heard, and WHEREAS, the Shorewood Zoning Ordinance, being Ordinance No. 77, in Section 7 sets forth the standards and conditions by which the City Council may grant conditional use permits, and WHEREAS, the City Council did consider the nature of the request, recommendations of the Planning Commission, testimony of the public and the requirements of Ordinance No. 77, and did deny the requested conditional use permit on a 3 to 2 vote by Resolution No. 50A -77, adopted July 25, 1977, and WHEREAS, the applicant thereafter commenced an action in Hennepin County District Court to obtain a writ of mandamus to compel the City Council to issue the requested conditional use permit and the Court did, on August 21, 1978, enter its Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Order for Judgment finding that the City Council's denial of the request for said conditional use permit was arbitrary, unreasonable, capricious and void and did conclude that the applicant was entitled to a judgment "compelling the City of Shorewood and its Council to issue �k conditional use permit to petitioner for a yacht club as applied for by petitioner ", and WHEREAS, the City Council did subsequently vote to forego an appeal of said Order, but the Gideon's Bay Homeowners Associa- tion did petition the Court and was permitted to intervene in said matter and file an appeal of said Order to the Minnesota Supreme Court and said appeal is now under consideration by the Supreme Court, and WHEREAS, as a result of the terms of permits as granted by the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District, the Department of Natural Resources and the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, the applicant has submitted a revised plan to the City providing for 80 sailboat slips, rather than 125, and reducing the number of parking spaces from that originally requested, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Shorewood, as follows: 1. That a conditional use permit for a yacht club pursuant to Ordinance No. 77, Sec. 18, Subd. 3D, and the conditions here- after specified is hereby granted to the Shorewood Yacht Club, Inc. 2. That said conditional use permit is subject to the effect of existing orders of the Hennepin County District Court and the right to continue operation df the yacht club pursuant to said permit is subject to any further orders of said Court and is further subject to disposition of the appeal currently before the M=J esota Supreme Court and shall terminate in the event said Court should reverse the judgment entered in the Hennepin County District Court compelling the Council to issue this permit. 3. That notwithstanding that the original application pro- posed installation of 125 sailboat slips and the Hennepin County District Court ordered issuance of a permit "as applied for ", in light of the fact that the applicant has now submitted a re- vised plan proposing 80 slips, the conditional use permit hereby granted shall be for 80 slips only, as described in the revised plans of March 9, 1979, but is nevertheless issued under and pur- suant to the original application and the order of the Court of August 21, 1978. 4. That said conditional use permit shall be valid and effective only so long as and during such period of time as the applicant continues to hold valid permits for 80 sailboat slips granted by the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District, the Depart- ment of Natural Resources, and the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. 5. That said conditional use permit is granted subject to compliance by Shorewood Yacht Club with the following conditions: dock a. Th&/permit shall be effective for a period of one year from the effective date thereof subject, however, to annual renewal under appropriate cir- cumstances. b. The permit shall be for the lands legally described . on plan sheet 2 of the plans submitted to the City dated March 9, 1979. c. Construction affecting drainage patterns shall be in accordance with the permit approvals granted by the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District dated December 7, 1978 and the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources dated March 15, 1979. d. The number of parking spaces provided shall be in accordance with the plans submitted dated March 9, 1979, and as required in the permit of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District dated December 7, 1978. 6, The permit shall be limited to the mooring of sailboats, except _`twee power boats used by the management in the sailing school. g. The following facilities shall be for the use of members only: (1) Launching ramp (2) Parking areas (3) Clubhouse (4) Sanitation facilities (5) Pump out (6) Summer /Winter storage h. Hours of club operation: Closing time (Sunday through Thursday): 10:00 p.m. (Friday through Saturday): 1:00 a.m. i. Dock quiet hours shall be between the hours of 10:00 pmm. and 8:00 a.m. j. Sailboats when not in use shall have their halyards secured by such devices as will minimize any noise which might be caused by them. k. Right -of -way whall be given to all barges and work boats being used by the adjacent dredging company. 1. Membership shall be geared as much as possible to accomodate Shorewood residents. M. Any radios utilized on -board sailboats shall be kept below decks with their volume at a discreet level. n. No members' pets shall be allowed on the premises. o. Pedestrian crossings of the railroad right -qf -way 1 shall be permitted and provided on the blacktop access driveway only. 6. That the conditional use permit herein granted shall not be effective until the applicant has provided the City with the following items: a. Evidence that Minnetonka Moorings, Inc. has completed purchase under a previously documented Purchase Agreement with Chicago, Northwestern Transportation Company for the ac uisition of two parcels of railroad right -of -way described 6n plan sheet 2 of the revised plans dated March 9, 1979) such that it possesses the requisite control and dominion over said railroad right -of -way parcels required by Ordinance No. 77, Sec. 7, Subd. 3.C.2. b. Evidence of a license from Chicago, Northwestern Transportation Company for purposes of access across the railroad right -of -way to that portion of the subject property which lies northerly of the rail- road right -of -way. c. An executed lease between Minnetonka Moorings, Inc., and Shorewood Yacht Club, Inc., covering Parcels A and B, the two parcels of railroad right - of -way acquired, and the access driveway as described on plan sheet 2 of the revised plans of March 9, 1979, providing the beneficial use thereof to Shorewood Yacht Club, Inc. Upon filing of such evidence with the City the same shall be referred to the City Attorney for review and upon his written approval thereof, filed with the City, the permit shall become effective. 7. That the conditional use permit hereby granted shall not constitute authorization to place fill upon wetlands nor constitute a building permit for any alterations or improvements of any structures located on the subject property. Separate permits shall be required from the City for such of these activities as are contemplated, if any. -4- Upon vote being taken, the following voted "aye ": Frazier, Haugen, Naegele, Shaw and the following voted "nay ": None (Keeler Absent) ADOPTED by the City Council this o - Z f day of d 1979. N RESOLUTION NO. ?' so RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of • Shorewood does hereby accept the gracious offer of Frank W. Griswold to make a cash donation of $15,000.00 to the City of Shorewood to be used as and for capital improvements for the benefit of the children of the City of Shorewood. The Council wishes to express its sincere appre- ciation for the unusual generosity of Mr. Griswold. The young men and women of the City of Shorewood will be truly grateful in years to come. Adopted by the City of Shorewood March 26, 1979 4 - yeas 0 - nays • w • • RESOLUTION NO. c- - i' RESOLVED, that the Council does approve the con- struction of a single family home on that portion of Lot 102, Auditor's Subdivision 141, which site is appro- ximately 36,000 square feet all as shown on plot plans heretofore filed by Frank W. Griswold with the City Clerk; that the construction of the home on the 36,000 square foot site is in the best interest of the City of Shore- wood in that in the past the site has been used for two building sites each of which were less than 36,000 square feet; RESOLVED FURTHER, that Frank W. Griswold is hereby given a permit to build a tennis court as chcK�m on the plans heretofore filed, which tennis court would be located • on the east portion of Lot 102 and which would use a portion of the adjacent railroad right -of -way for its construction. Parking would be located east of the tennis court with access through City of Deephaven streets; that said tennis court would be a private tennis court for the benefit of lots located in the City of Deep - haven as well as for the benefit of the home to be built on Lot 102. That the part of Lot 102 on which the tennis court is to be built shall be authorized as a separate tax parcel. Adopted by the City of Shorewood March 26, 1979 4 - yeas 0 - nays • RESOLUTION NO. 20 -79 ON WESTERN AND NORTHWESTERN HENNEPIN COUNTY LAW ENFORCEMENT STUDY WHEREAS, several suburban units of government have requested technical assistance from the Hennepin County Criminal Justice Coordinating Council to assess the law enforcement service needs and problems of their communities; and WHEREAS, the Hennepin County Criminal Justice Coordinating Council has directed its staff to initiate a study to assess the police services needs of the suburban communities located in Western and Northwestern Hennepin County. BE IT RESOLVED, that the County of Hennepin agrees to partic- pate in a study of law enforcement needs and problems affecting communities in Western and Northwestern Hennepin County; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Hennepin County Sheriff, the Office of Planning and Development and other County agencies are requested to cooperate in this study. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Shorewood, this 26th day of February, 1979 Mayor . ATTEST: Elsa I. Wiltsey, Clerk Administrator • P :SOLUTION ISO. 19 - 79 R. ESOLUTION REQUESTING 1978 -79 LOCAL PLAIn,7ING ASSISTANCE GRAI +T FUNDS rRO'K TEE METEOPOLITAIT COUivCIL W1111P,AS, the Metropolitan Land Planning Act, Minnesota Statutes, Section 473.851-473.872, requires that City of Shorewood prepare and submit a comprehensive plan to the Metropolitan Council; and TP LEAS, the Metropolitan Council and City of Shorewood entered into a contract, numbered 7843 and dated March 3, 1978 for a Local Planning Assistance Grant for 1976 -77 grant funds in the amount of 31857. to assist City of Shorewood in carrying out the required planning; and WHEFL4AS, the Metropolitan Council has allocated $2052. to the City of Shorewood in additional grant funds for 1978 -79; and T4ri- - H,REAS, the total grants from the Metropolitan Council will not exceed 75% of the total cost or 100; of the remaining cost of carrying out the required planning which is documented in Appendix A of the above- referenced contract. NOW THEREFORE, the City of Shorewood requests the additional 1978 -79 . grant funds and authorizes the Clerk to execute the Agreement Amend- ment to the above- referenced contract on behalf of City of Shorewood. Adopted by City of Shorewood this day of t 1 979• Ny Mayor Frazier Attest Elsa I. Wiltsey, Clerk is • RESOLUTION NO X79 WHEREAS, the City of Shorewood has executed a Cooperation Agreement with Hennepin County agreeing to participate in the Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant Program, and WHEREAS, a three year Community Development Program and Housing Assistance Plan has been prepared consistent with the Comprehensive Urban Hennepin County Community Development strategy and the Community Develop— ment Program Regulations, and lfilEREAS, the three year Community Development Program and Housing Assistance Plan has been subject to citizen review pursuant to the Urban Hennepin County Citizen Participation Plan. BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Shorewood, Mn. approved the proposed three year Community Development Program and Housing Assistance Plan and authorizes the appropriate execution of the application material and transmit it to Hennepin County for consideration as part of the Year V Urban Hennepin County Community Development t3lock Grant Application. Adopted by the Council of the City of Shorewood this 26th day of February, 1979 Mayor Attest Elsa Wiltsey Clerk • RESOLUTION N0. 1 • RESOLVED that the division of Tract A, Registered Land Survey No. 1, Plat 35410, Parcel 1000, requested by Don Anderson, 5665 Howard's Point Road is approved in accordance with the following description (survey dated - 5th of April, 1979)• Parcel A - All that part of Tract A, which lies Northerly of a line 219.79 feet South of, measured at a right angle to and parallel with the North line of said Tract A. except the East 835.50-feet thereof. Parcel B - The North 219.79 feet of the East 835.50 feet of Tract A, (Area is 183 squre feet of 4.215 acres). Parcel C - Tract A, Registered Land Survey, except the North 219.79 feet. FURL, said division to provide a 50' easement for driveway purposes over Tract A. 0 Dated: 3 -,, , �? Adopted by the City Council of the City of Shorewood, this 12th day of February, 1979• Mayor Attest: Clerk/Administrator RESOLUTION NO. 12 -79 • WHEREAS, through the years it has become necessary to delete, add to, and amend the ordinances; and WHEREAS, the ordinances now have become repetitious and very difficult to interpret and to understand by the citizens, as well as the courts; THEREFORE, be it resolved that the attorney and staff, working with the city clerk's office, is hereby authorized to proceed on the codification of the city ordinances ; that is, to rewrite codify, add and delete as necessary, based on an hourly rate of $40.00 per hour for attorney's time and $10.00 per hour for secretarial time plus cost of photo copies as used. Approved by the City Council of the • City of Shorewood this 23rd day of January, 1979. 0 RESOLUTION NO: =D 79 RESOLVED, that the Council of the City of Shorewood hereby approves the application from Howard's Point Marina c/o David Polley, Treasurer,.dt 5400 Howards Point Road, Shorewood, Hennepin, Mn. for 45 docks and 13 drystored - arrangement presented for 1979• Approved by the Council this 23rd day of January, 1979• Mayor Attest: • Elsa I. Wiltsey C RESOLTUION'NO. 12 -C 79 0 RESOLVED, that the Council of the City of Shorewood hereby approves the application from Tom Wartman of Boulder Bridge Farm, Inc., 28124 Smithtown Road, Shorewood, Hennepin, Mn. for 40 docks - dock arrangement presented for 1979• Approved by the Council this 23rd_ day of Jaa� 1979. Mayor Attest Elsa I. Wiltsey, Clerk • RESOLUTION N0. I2-=B ' 79 . RESOLVED, that the Council of the City of Shorewood hereby approves the application from Donald K. Rippel, Commodore of the Upper Lake Minnetonka Yacht Club of Lots 1 & 2, Block 4, Aud. Sub #354, Enchanted Island, Mound, Hennepin, Minnesota for a renewal of the dock license for 10 docks and 20 drystored as the dock arrangement for 1979. Approved by the Council this 23rd day of January, 1979 Q) A� --� .Attest: • Elsa I. Wiltsey • RESOLUTION NO. 12 —A 79 RESOLVED, that the Council of the City of Shorewood hereby approves the application from Adeline Johnston, 5465 Howards Point Road, Shorewood, Hennepin, Minnesota for renewal of her dock license for 5 — 6 boats with the dock arrangement presented for 1979. Approved by the Council this 23rd of January, 1979. Mayor Attest Elsa I. Wiltsey 0 k RESOLUTION /I7 Of The Shorewood City Council WHEREAS, the recreational program of the City of Shorewood is a high priority for this City, and WHEREAS, the City has in the past and will in the future spend a large portion of its budget on capital park improve- ments and in order to insure that these parks are fully utilized the City has in the past contracted with football associations and hockey associations for the full use of these facilities, and WHEREAS, the City of Shorewood is currently involved in the construction of a full size baseball facility and is vitally interested in insuring that maximum opportunity be given to the young people of this area to use this facility and to that end recognizes the American Legion Baseball is the goal to which all young baseball players aspire, NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Shorewood does request the Clarence Clofer American Legion Post No. 259 to sponser a second American Legion baseball team for the 1979 baseball season to play its home games at the baseball field now being readied by the City. The Council makes this request with the under- standing that no financial involvement will be asked of the Legion Post but that its cooperation is necessary if the team is to be fielded. The Shorewood Council, recognizing the close cooperation which has always existed between the City of Shorewood and Post 259, wishes to take this opportunity of thanking that organization for its cooperation in helping to make the Shorewood recreational program a success. Passed this 623 ® day of , 1979 j Yeas Nays 1 wpt1etir -- — `;vazdy $,.. X979 opopien #S -TrO e Y - 3,i 41 ii+ _ Wik /e,ir ' � � �J �. •!�'� tF t P+Ss rG-y 4 -. r - - '" 4 d�.ti-. user twat' --mac * A ocx eye Ysp - i✓ �.- �i �yyR - Ciir B :�iy+} n l!�?wyy� VJRI,J+S - -�` L * �R'4eM -- }'kp p��i 0iyy a y ? ae 1 Q l, on ' sed6 &d by �r ove "8 tf3 f t iJns y./+��'!+y� yy� p. � v �y r /�F lt �y �y � t �� 'Ot t "3+ tizig,:'�t �� } Ommi ''♦'{�M1!i��i�F��j z- -*_ - ^([ yyy - �.�W}�Y _� -- .{ ::`,' \t7+1,A- "f�}5i{��+��4- -- - . M�Fyf�i R^/1 {� ;/ "' /�1�y� �+K�,�/�19A� ^✓i�A'( ei' .. ' 1 X V +a t or i s , 6 yy ' . ( gq 'w++s - �YIi/.GIlr «. T +. yM' R �I I.7,p � yj f + ' i �� ±^��jry {��;{ �b' � - �+� -+' -dry �,y �y�{'.y��e�W}-Z/���pi�� i f.�dmini Cit aY V Vie - �fl ii i '�{ }{ [� dry 3st rator- Wilt Bel Stet tk o Kiniraetori�a P A c " SafetyFrai Alternate; it C6 an ` Ii au get 70 Interovor Affiar � : °.Legislrative I b ry st Gottnai �e le ': $te atxce ier . C€�aT�ro�san � - -'♦ 13M Fh�- -�,!� - - - ,- y1iµir�SRTveo},j V iJL U �'%�eq��y� # VFW fR�i�IF " a{tillnl$$2�& or 4lteey C3 I.S�i : tt l3 - fk 1 2i 6 nded `�?�" ler. t " =8t <1j�9 c iP y t _- Y � Y'* "�T..y _ k h 'T Regales CCt'4�21�cil Neetil .� .Fat ar'y ;" 7 �S4LE3fi1C f 700. ' ; � 19 1 ES(?LV t}, � z be ap anted: a rep�ce, a xv s to i +c i I Aaaotiation of �fetx�opolitan Municipalities W ague ct Ci d Im tipatit l.es w �r'.i t t 11411;1; _1112112 Alternate-. K ee er k �- { Z S�t�k urba -';," lutharity _ SZaett .C4s8r�re axe x - ounca lmaxzae�ele ac kttg Councilman Shaw L - 4 etch► Coi unity $ervz v Ad�tisor 00 jr s 5. Su aa1u atUre Se vx+ a `�- r°ee tative - e oo Ccsuhcil ont .1� n Hi t er Y A maetion whe mad hy^ Na ge e +ec a llg 0 adopt the ab Ve ree61 ut3on. .. - atics i. tarried an a vote pf .�.... Ayes '., 0 aye F � `T SUb 3 g ttw tale xiahet 6 ntca State iae des * . Ahi aI depbsitory . t+iO tl� �t�� r e �� Hen,_ ee�z lry „ �'Z'a2� g t+� SdOlft the al�4�a�s reeolut� - ” l on ',a, vo U n . a OLVM, : that :t he I�averxek Nesaepaper be cle�i � the � �� ne�spsa r ��x � Y 811 l egal: puhlxcat ions fad' 1979• : �� P M A mot ft, 41r Made lad I ft seoond.ed by Naeg6le g to - adapt the a *a -re6o :utian# a#;1a73 G&'3'4'C1'. fl31 t3t$#`;`EY7 4$S• OL1��, that t�iE$ fallowing be appointed to the Plannang Commission for R tee three years *- terms to exp3.re.,,1 1,► Robert Cie 2. Wati Stovez' ed (01*n C t eplaC�O 1 31, 79) j -p .g Wy -?IVY � tIRP �i .ii L'4.bif�R• ill a '4 ��r; .� � >s `. �y s � Y' AiW - k ,Yi S LV + g ,that .the, foll6vfing s era "be pg�► ed te' the 'irk C Asion f cvr a . 4 - �xy ��(q���q�y ��w �yyp��y j.. �y �y+�a .f y...p = tei.Y tV :4xPiF+L�e - W t�l{AL.-ee year 'j .�a I ' W2 a�ALI ;r�� ookheim F Goett e lman t yyy i o p b seaancted t t e� the a sus i+���p - t'i1M- V+ ;)irVd< -- - .; "� }A' -+�}y y ii�Y\N j 11 , 4 t y Mt'' - �aL Y.Jwii V1Ti tj "R >•A ' a B Y - 'Ai.�#T; F71 #4 Fii3VilG`YY,µ " M- iif4!4'' 4thGP F6 ft, �i /ktCT,a#r' - �?V -':. F ,• - s ' . - - • L 6 � whor 11 - NWw, �, - ,�, r low - _ a, x _p RV IS -} a ss r ?ham s 7 ot cmftm z: Et6tGn, y IRCZahi?wh i of Human Scrvw Coum6 * CQU,n!� vii t� Awu4a &�s 7z. Cam����4c���4�� ys �ans��O to N�v�� Co����ou►� -Puouw. Sa*els Counedi z2. of �tr'atc�,- rc'r ��-t� Hin, Coug1v goa+k and -ffi -fie f�m t+ccwlaa,ort Sevuces Cae+ -n� - R la anshti�o a Cown L5 zaf f't7 Huwalt Semats Councr s T T: tip - Rrlat&nA2p of 95c:5 fb Count e7--.A4ou44li ce5 It. HENN. COUNTY BOARD NWHHSCI-1 _ Nartlu�st }I�'r�t, - +funrary SemxcPS C�wri�cG . WHWSPS w6tmcr�guo"A, SH HS S'O&A ffei m?du�lc r Sev «e5 Cownc�G Iz?Afta kd ��s�r�ra�h an sevute pla�c�ir:� erc�inahon� F n di� s ar'� a eon oYL hu ~sefvice cotiodl boards <.�G� ' a* Gt ste� oiie thevn t6c of theNSG�ar�s. �fowe�r, t 4 ��,ywr� a�ea�� caue���pa�r .su�iu� -6C a4�u �'e�ne�atit, �= C14A to #env#,;t C "t y aln& #v t rey H5C'5 'i HENN. COUNTY BOARD c (nvate, �io�c- �r�it) WHNSP8 A s�- � f e or i 50 A a C r " M'm Of �?P� c (nvate, �io�c- �r�it) Y3 'TuW Ofta�14 % 3 TWtlak 5ec&r %3 ��ium 7leS t�ic�oor WHNSP8 A s�- � f e or Y3 'TuW Ofta�14 % 3 TWtlak 5ec&r %3 ��ium 7leS t�ic�oor CSA FUNDING Cown�ija acscg s c. A. A. uith authority Mv #,*Pjwwu / 6- thelpor e�'rommmwnity °r�a�iz�9 �utsvn : CAA Rand sdzac T l Wa & wk HscBwt (4(aeot w D f CAA Bd� d ut �Zot Z � )� aC� NSC - savd e&6t I C�adorL fn c,9q B CGt�san ie�a f HSGZ�L, but�teC4 4 BW SHNSC A s�- � f e or CSA FUNDING Cown�ija acscg s c. A. A. uith authority Mv #,*Pjwwu / 6- thelpor e�'rommmwnity °r�a�iz�9 �utsvn : CAA Rand sdzac T l Wa & wk HscBwt (4(aeot w D f CAA Bd� d ut �Zot Z � )� aC� NSC - savd e&6t I C�adorL fn c,9q B CGt�san ie�a f HSGZ�L, but�teC4 4 BW �G�A lUf2d`1 D� CAA — $oaw i -b 4&ttic� tl Z C'dGf�'Gf�L� 0- f 5CS HENN. COUNTY BOARD I PUBLIC OFFICIALS 4.-4# t bq C�UKn f`E ag4 d, 2..�Vmn+- �ttians9i�Lt� C .&�. e � NSA •� (�� 3. 9 tatazG i��6ekS C3 fv ared) PRIVATE SECTOR. A �G�(��Q���Ct' N�G �raminalran .2. NSC's 1 laZ ayewdes a. �Grgibk a!enues Yid k 0, e 414 y(a s 4. 9�e,�t G3 ea�ty vnc) REPRESENTATIVES OF POOR �. E�aml Al at- th electrdf2 �s l tAt cm/oluuv 2 ✓ - HS Cs Set lAnd4ye- eleG imj 3. 91m eothen 63 fimt eaat,, arm) Com'num lJr Flenov pens — — — --> ., (pttb r "n ........ ............� Admin%s v� w/ of d&Lftm P"s (�oor) ---Z*okt1 ---- ) n A NOHSC W HHSPB I PUBLIC OFFICIALS 4.-4# t bq C�UKn f`E ag4 d, 2..�Vmn+- �ttians9i�Lt� C .&�. e � NSA •� (�� 3. 9 tatazG i��6ekS C3 fv ared) PRIVATE SECTOR. A �G�(��Q���Ct' N�G �raminalran .2. NSC's 1 laZ ayewdes a. �Grgibk a!enues Yid k 0, e 414 y(a s 4. 9�e,�t G3 ea�ty vnc) REPRESENTATIVES OF POOR �. E�aml Al at- th electrdf2 �s l tAt cm/oluuv 2 ✓ - HS Cs Set lAnd4ye- eleG imj 3. 91m eothen 63 fimt eaat,, arm) Com'num lJr Flenov pens — — — --> ., (pttb r "n ........ ............� Admin%s v� w/ of d&Lftm P"s (�oor) ---Z*okt1 ---- ) n A s� �s C W HHSPB �sor cow of�Poor I PUBLIC OFFICIALS 4.-4# t bq C�UKn f`E ag4 d, 2..�Vmn+- �ttians9i�Lt� C .&�. e � NSA •� (�� 3. 9 tatazG i��6ekS C3 fv ared) PRIVATE SECTOR. A �G�(��Q���Ct' N�G �raminalran .2. NSC's 1 laZ ayewdes a. �Grgibk a!enues Yid k 0, e 414 y(a s 4. 9�e,�t G3 ea�ty vnc) REPRESENTATIVES OF POOR �. E�aml Al at- th electrdf2 �s l tAt cm/oluuv 2 ✓ - HS Cs Set lAnd4ye- eleG imj 3. 91m eothen 63 fimt eaat,, arm) Com'num lJr Flenov pens — — — --> ., (pttb r "n ........ ............� Admin%s v� w/ of d&Lftm P"s (�oor) ---Z*okt1 ---- ) n A s� �s C of� I PUBLIC OFFICIALS 4.-4# t bq C�UKn f`E ag4 d, 2..�Vmn+- �ttians9i�Lt� C .&�. e � NSA •� (�� 3. 9 tatazG i��6ekS C3 fv ared) PRIVATE SECTOR. A �G�(��Q���Ct' N�G �raminalran .2. NSC's 1 laZ ayewdes a. �Grgibk a!enues Yid k 0, e 414 y(a s 4. 9�e,�t G3 ea�ty vnc) REPRESENTATIVES OF POOR �. E�aml Al at- th electrdf2 �s l tAt cm/oluuv 2 ✓ - HS Cs Set lAnd4ye- eleG imj 3. 91m eothen 63 fimt eaat,, arm) Com'num lJr Flenov pens — — — --> ., (pttb r "n ........ ............� Admin%s v� w/ of d&Lftm P"s (�oor) ---Z*okt1 ---- ) n 'Relatianeh�fGAA sfu HsC,shrh° HENN COUNTY BOARD NIW1 5TAFF (�Mby culf�r ) C amrn. sta�on fYUC� WHPSPB STAFF s (POIrrwVfJ o& .5 Onl CAA. i l 3 kuma n Suc. Comn- t s - CAA COORDINATiON TE4M� I ` G44 R &ahvc Z)ilmdm tau time c&,eiad1hovk1ve #r S H NSC STAFF �d c ��' azctYe eo sta on CowtYaC� f AK CA A CAA STAFF tr 64.4 Caa ha tionTM4Vtl ia o�t�iblc for'ca natr�n afPvtloi m,1 7 Rteach, ClWmVutr� ), �nol ca�natWy gro 0 cvtth alt- Rumm Scytl«e (mo nuC 141 V. NARRATIVE DIAGRAM I - Existing Relationship of Human Services Councils to Hennepin County and the Suburban Muni cipalities The Human Services Councils have been designated by the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners to be the local agencies responsible for human services planning and coordination in their respective suburban planning areas. Each council operates under a joint powers agreement of their member municipalities and has officially appointed representatives of the municipalities on their Board of Directors, and each receives some funding from the member cities, Hennepin County provides a basic yearly grant to the Suburban Human Services Councils, In addition to the municipalities shown on the chart, the planning areas of the Councils also include all townships within the borders of suburban Hennepin County. Thus, the Suburban Planning Councils collectively are presently serving all of Hennepin County, excluding the City of Minneapolis, DIAGRAM II - The CAA Relati onship to the Hennepin County Board and the Human Servi Counc The CAA will be private, non - profit, and designated by the County Board to serve the poor and near poor of suburban and rural Hennepin County. The CAA will have authority over all CSA funding and CSA funded programs for the poor and near poor. The CAA will contract, almost exclusively, for all programs and program activities, with the most appropriate agencies in the communities. There has been a consensus by the Hennepin County Board and the suburban municipalities that the HSC's, because of their present role in community -based human services planning, would be the appropriate community groups to carry out the planning, outreach and community organizing functions of the CAA. Other benefits derived from this linkage are: (1) The contract would link the CAA and the HSC in a coordi- nated and collaborative effort, minimizing fragmentation and duplication; (2) The municipalities would have better opportunity to relate to the program activities of the CAA; (3) The CAA could more effectively utilize the planning network of agencies and human services providers which is already in place through the HSC, ' Because of the special relationship between the HSC and the CAA, there will be a provision in the by -laws regarding the role and relationship between them. In addition the by -laws will designate procedures for the monitoring, evaluation and renewal of the HSC contracts. Each of the HSC will have advisory committees composed of representa- tives of the poor from their respective areas, according to CSA guide- lines . There will be non-voting liaisons from each of the HSC to the CAA Board, selected by each HSC; and, the CAA Board will appoint non- voting liaisons to each HSC. The role of the liaisons will be to foster coordination and communication. DIAGRAM III - Relationship of the CAA Board to the Hennepin County Board and the HSC A. Public Officials A total of 9 public officials will be appointed to the CAA for 2 year terms by the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners. A minimum of 3 nominations for these positions will be submitted by each of the HSC to the Commissioners. The County Board may reject any of the nominees and add appointees on their own initiative. B. Private Sector A total of 9 private sector representatives will be appointed by the CAA Board for 2 year terms. Each HSC will nominate 3 agencies or organizations from their area, which meet the eligibility requirements for the private sector, as outlined in the by -laws. The CAA Board may reject any nominations and initiate additional appointees. C. Representatives of Poor A minimum of 9 representatives of the poor will be elected for 2 year terms. 1/3 elected from each planning area. The election process will include the following: -- nominees - residents, eligible under CSA guidelines. -- voters - residents, fall within CSA poverty income guide- lines, must attest that the above is true at time of voting -- nominations submitted by qualified voters to office before elections -- elections at set time at various sites, monitored by persons designated by Board -- written ballot The HSC will administer the election process in their respective planning areas, as provided in the CAA by -laws. (As with all delegated responsibilities, this activity will be monitored and evaluated according to CSA regulations and CAA Board guidelines.) DIAGRAM IV - Relationship of CAA Staff and HSC Staff The CAA will be staffed by two full -time persons initially. (1) An Executive Director (2) A full -time Clerical /Bookkeeper In order to ensure coordination of planning, outreach and community organizing activities, the Executive Director of the CAA will chair a coordination team, composed of the HSC directors. This team functions as a consulting body and is responsible for coordination of programs and services for the poor and integration of those programs and services with the total range of HSC activities in suburban and rural Hennepin County.