82-090
J.
.
~
REGULAR COUNCIL MINUTES
- 3 -
NOVEMBER 22, 1982
FINAL PLAT REVIEW - TINGEWOOD DEVELOPMENT. fiSOLU'l'IONNO. .90-82
Review was presented by developers and questions of the Council were
clarified. ..
Haugen~.moved, seconded by Gagne, to approve the plat'.as submitted, sub-
ject to approval of the developmental contract.
By roll call vote - Haugen - aye, Shaw - passed, Leonardo - aye,
Gagne - aye, Rascop - aye. Shaw abstained on second vote.
Motion was approved with 4 ayes and 1 abstain.
TINGEWOOD DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT - FIRST READING
Council moved to table the first reading of the agreement.
8:30 PUBLIC HEARING
VARIANCE REQUEST - JOHN HUNNER
Mr. Runner, 20625 Radisson Inn Road, presented his building plans and
pictures of his house and lot in its present state. He would like to
add an additon~l story to his existing house. Council discussed what
is allowable under the Ordinance in accordance with variance request.
Haugen requested the Council continue Public Hearing and have staff
obtain additional information. Seconded by Gagne. Motion carried un-
animously.
NAEGELE SIGN ISSUE -DEFINING ORDINANCE
A letter was reviewed from Frank Kelly, author of the Sign Ordinance,
giving his interpretation for authorizing signs in Commercial Districts.
Rascop moved, seconded by Gagne, to support Attorney Larson's inter-
pretation previously submitted in writing to the Council~
Rascop withdrew his motion, seconded by Gagne, for further discussion.
Leonardo moved, seconded by Gagne, to interpret Ordinance as to allow
advertising sign, "billboards" as accessory use in C-2 and C-3 zones
when the principal structure is a permitted primary use.
Motion carried with 3 ayes, 2 nayes - Haugen & Shaw.
NAEGELE SIGN PERMIT - CHRISTMAS LAKE ROAD AND HIGHWAY 7
Nancy Jorgenson and Julianne Bye, representing Naegele Sign Company,
in reference to the sign located at Christmas Lake Road and Highway 7.
Attorney Larson reviewed the Resolution passed by the Council, instruct-
ing Naegle to remove the newly constructed sign at that location. The
sign company representatives would like the Council to amend the Reso-
lution and allow the sign to continue to exist at the current location.
Extensive discussion of the Council and concerned residents, Mr. & Mrs.
Davis :4:01 lowed . .
Haugen moved, to allow the sign to remain for a period of three (3)
years or until the taking of the first 6ign in the state under the
"Beautification Act". Gagne seconded for discussion.
Haug~n then moved, seconded by Gagne,: to instruct iAttorney Larson to
set forth findings in regard to the Naegele sign issue.