041006 CC Reg AgP
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
MONDAY, APRIL 10,2006
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
7:00 P.M.
AGENDA
1. CONVENE CITY COUNCIL MEETING
A. Roll Call
Mayor Love _
Lizee
Turgeon _
Callies
Wellens
B. Review Agenda
2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. City Council Regular Meeting Minutes, March 27, 2006 (Att.- Minutes)
3. CONSENT AGENDA - Motion to approve items on Consent Agenda & Adopt Resolutions
Therein:
NOTE: Give the public an opportunity to request an item be removedfrom the
Consent Agenda. Comments can be taken or questions asked following removal from
Consent Agenda.
A. Approval of the Verified Claims List (Att.- Claims List)
B. Staffing - No action required
C. City Clerk's License Approvals - Biennial Gambling License for American Legion Post
#259 (Att. - Draft Resolution)
D. Accept Plans and Specifications and Authorize Advertisement for Bids for 2006
Sealcoating of Streets, City Project 06-01 (Att.- Director of Public Works' memorandum,
Resolution)
E. Authorization for Expenditure of Funds for Document Imaging Enhancements (Att-
Deputy Clerk's memorandum)
4. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR (No Council action will be taken.)
5. REPORTS AND PRESENTATIONS
A. Report on MCE Activities - Tim Litfin, Director
6. PUBLIC HEARING
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - April 10, 2006
PAGE20F2
7. PARKS
8. PLANNING - Report by Representative
A. Lot Area Variance and Minor Subdivision (Att. - Planning Director's memorandum)
Applicant: Ann Meldahl
Location: 6180 Cathcart Drive
9. GENERAL/NEW BUSINESS
A. Excelsior Fire District 2006-2025 Capital Equipment Plan (Att. - City Administrator's
memorandum)
10. ENGINEERING/PUBLIC WORKS
A. Approve Plans, Specifications and Estimates and Authorize Advertisement for Bids for
Amesbury / SE Area Interconnect (Att. - Engineer's memorandum, Resolution)
11. STAFF AND COUNCIL REPORTS
A. Administrator & Staff
B. Mayor & City Council
12. RECESS TO EXECUTIVE SESSION - SLMPD ARBITRATION STRATEGY
13. ADJOURN
CITY OF
SHOREWOOD
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD' SHOREWOOD. MINNESOTA 55331-8927' (952) 474-3236
FAX (952) 474-0128. www.cLshorewood.mn.us . cityhall@ci.shorewood.mn.us
Celebrating 50 Years' 1956 - 2006
Executive Summary
Shorewood City Council Regular Meeting
Monday, 10 April 2006
A 5:30 P.M. Work Session will be held this evening.
It may be recessed for the Regular Meeting, and continued after the Regular Meeting.
Agenda Item #3A:
Agenda Item #3B:
Enclosed is the Verified Claims List for Council approval.
There are no staffing items for consideration.
Agenda Item #3C: The American Legion Post No. 259 has held a Biennial Gambling License
for the past several years. It is time for the Post to renew its license for the next two
years, as the current license expires on June 30, 2006. The State of Minnesota Gambling
Control Board requires a resolution of approval from the City in which the site is
location. As appropriate fees have been paid, and there have been no gambling violations
within the past two years, approval of a resolution is in order.
Agenda Item #30: Each year the City of Shorewood encumbers $65,000 of the operating
budget for the sealcoating of roadways within the City. Year 2006 is no exception.
This resolution approves the plans and specifications for such services and authorizes the
advertisement for bids. If approved, the bid opening for this project is scheduled for 10:00 a.m.,
Wednesday, May 3, 2005.
Agenda Item #3E: The 2006 Budget includes funds for Laserfiche WebLink, and for
Programming Services to create a database for the City's property files-both
enhancements to the City's existing Laserfiche Document Imaging System. WebLink
provides self-serve access for authorized staff, clients and the public, to documents made
available online, such as current and prior year's Agenda Packets, Minutes, Resolutions,
Ordinances, Annual Budget and Audit Reports, etc. The City will be able to retain
complete control over what documents are made available for public access online. The
Programming Services will create a property file structure by address for each property in
the City. Creation of this database will allow Staff to begin efficiently scanning the
property files into the Laserfiche repository. The cost for the Laserfiche Web Link
software, and the annual software and license maintenance is approximately $10,099; the
cost for the Property File Structure Programming Services is $750 (for a total cost of
$10,849). Sufficient funds are available in the 2006 Budget for both of these items.
1ft.
f: . PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
...
Executive Summary - City Council Meeting of 10 April 2006
Page 2 of2
Agenda Item #5A: Mr. Tim Litfin, Director of Minnetonka Community Education (MCE),
will present an update on MCE activities, on the new advisory council organization, and
the change in MCE's name.
Agenda Item #8A: Ann and John Meldahl have requested a lot area variance to subdivide
their property at 6180 Cathcart Drive into two lots. They ask that one of the lots be
30,000 square feet in area instead of the 40,000 square feet that is required. It should be
noted that the Meldahls have an application on hold that complies with the 40,000
square-foot requirement. The Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend
denial of the variance. They went on to advise the applicants that the previous
subdivision would be viewed favorably. The Meldahls have chosen to pursue the
variance request at the Council meeting Monday night. It is recommended that the
Council direct staff to prepare a findings of fact denying the variance for the next Council
meeting. Assuming the Meldahls want to subdivide their property, they should submit a
letter asking for their conforming application to be placed on the May Planning
Commission agenda.
Agenda Item #9A: The joint powers agreement for the Excelsior Fire District requires that
amendments to the Capital Equipment Program be approved by at least two-thirds ofthe
member cities by April 15. The EFD Board has recommended its 2006-2025 CEP.
Some changes to the program have been made in order to account for anticipated price
increases for major pieces of equipment needed in the next few years, and adjustments in
annual funding needed to accomplish the program. Interim Chief Dana George is
expected to be present at the Council meeting to review the 2006-2025 CEP. Council
approval of the 2006-2025 CEP can be done by simple majority vote on a motion to do
so.
Agenda Item #lOA: The Southeast Area Well / Amesbury Area Well Interconnection Project is
being initiated by the city to upgrade the system so that it is in compliance with current
plumbing code, provide a more reliable system for the Amesbury Area, and create
opportunities for providing better quality water.
Since this is a City-initiated project, the abutting properties will not be assessed for the
improvements. Property owners will be charged a $10,000 connection fee if they choose
to hook up to the new water service connection point. This connection is voluntarily.
This resolution approves the plans and specifications for such services and authorizes the
advertisement for bids. If approved, the bid opening for this project is scheduled for
10:00 a.m., Wednesday, May 17, 2005.
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
MONDAY, MARCH 27, 2006
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
7:00 P.M.
MINUTES
1. CONVENE CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Mayor Love called the meeting to order at 7:02 P.M.
A.
RollCall
Present.
Mayor Love; Councilmembers Turgeon, and Wellens; Administrator Dawson; Attorney
Keane; Finance Director Burton; DirectorofPlIblic Works BroMm; Planning Director
Nielsen
Also present: Planning Commissioner Meyer;
Davis
Absent:
Councilmembers Callies, Lizee
B.
Review Agenda
Motion passed 3/0.
Wellens moved, Turgeon seconded,
2.
2.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. City ~1)J!."cil RegularMeeting Minutes, March 13,2006
Wellens ml)ved, Turgeonse.~l)!)ded\!~PP.rl)yiugthe City Couucil Regular Meetiug Minutes of
March 13'rrq!mnilllf',i\mentle~,!ou Pageli,'Item 1l.B, Paragraph 2, Senteuce 1, change
"CouucilllwmberWellell~,questio;"ied the appropriateness of Iuterim Chief ou the Steering
Commi~ee." to "Councib'll~Tber W~!lens questioned the appropriateness of the Iuterim Chief
being"6n::~-h,e Stecring Conlll1.ittee if h(\was going to be an applicant for the position." Motion
passed 3/01" ^, ."
<:<:':'.H,
B. 'CitJr,Couucil W'o'rk Sessiou Minutes, March 13,2006
",.. ,',,'
Turgeon moved, WeIle"s,s,eCl)nded, Approving the City Council Special Meeting Minntes of March
13, 2006, as presented. Q\1otion passed 3/0.
3. CONSENT AGENDA - Motion to approvc items ou Cousent Agenda & Adopt Resolntions
Therein:
Mayor Love reviewed the Items on the Consent Agenda.
Item 3.E, Approval of the Spring Clean-Up Contract for Services, was removed from the Consent Agenda
and renamed Item 9.A.
1#2A I
CITY OF SHOREWOODCOUNCIL MEETING
March 27, 2006
Page 2 of 10
Welleus moved, Turgeon secoudcd, Approviug the Motions contained on Couseut Agenda &
Adopting the Resolutions Thereiu:
A. Approval of the Verified Claims List.
B. Staffiug - Adopting RESOLUTION NO. 06-023, "A Resolution Approving the
Appoiutment of Michelle Nguyen as Senior Accouutiug Clerk."
C. Approval of the Agreement with Minnetonka Community;Jiiducatiou for Lifeguard
Services for Crescent Beach.
D. Authorization for Expenditure ofFuuds to Purchflse Seal. Coat Aggregate.
E. Approval ofthc Spriug Clean-Up ContractforServices (This.it~m was moved to Item
9.A under GeneralINew Business).
F. Adopting RESOLUTION NO. 06-024,"~Resoluti!,ln Proclaimiug ArliorDay on
April 28, 2006."
Motiou passed 3/0.
4. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR
There were no matters from the floor presented
evening.
5. REPORTS ANDPRESEN"l"',ATIONS
None.
6. PUBLIC HEARING
,."""..:..:.,,;,.;.... ......,;;... ',;""",.;.<.
"'>:"'.>>;;.,:..:".,., '. ,:":':;', " "';':'.
A. Public Hearing to Vacate Certain Draiuage aud Utility Easements
Applicaut: Mark Sass
Location: 22690/22740 Murray Street and 6035 Galpin Lake Road
Mayor Love opel1yd the public hearing at 7:07 P.M.
Administrator Dawsbhn~!~t~d:Vacating a utility easement required a public hearing, and he stated this
item was related to Item'~.lZJ,"A Minor Subdivision/Combination (Lot Line Rearrangement) for applicant
Mark Sass, 22690/22740 Murray Street and 6035 Galpin Lake Road."
Director Nielsen stated the applicant, Mark Sass, owns the two properties at 22690 and 22740 Murray
Street. Mr. Sass had arranged to purchase a strip of property from Brent Sinn, 6035 Galpin Lake Road.
To accomplish this, Mr. Sass and Mr. Sinn had applied for a minor subdivision and combination that
would rearrange the boundaries between their lots.
Nielsen explained the lot line rearrangement involved vacating the existing drainage and utility easement
that was platted as part of the Zachary Woods development (Sinn's property), in exchange for new
CITY OF SHOREWOODCOUNCIL MEETING
March 27, 2006
Page 3 of 10
drainage and utility easements along the new north property line and around the perimeters of the Sass
lots. Nielsen then explained the public hearing was to address vacating the existing drainage and utility
easement.
Nielsen stated the Planning Commission recommended approval of the subdivision/combination because
it brought Mr. Sass's lots into compliance with R-lC standards by adding depth to both of his properties.
He also stated the proposed rearrangement does not adversely affect the ability of Mr. Sinn to re-divide
his property in the future, noting that would require coordination with other property owners. He stated
Staff recommended vacating the existing easement in exchange for the new e.aSements being recorded.
Nielsen recommended Council address Agenda Item 8.C as part of Item 6.A.
Seeing no one present wishing to comment on this case, Mayor Love closed the Public Testimony portion
of the Public Hearing at 7: 11 P.M.
Without objection from Council, Mayor Love stated .Item 8.C would be taken
agenda and be addressed at this time.
from the
Councilmember Wellens stated the request for the subdiyi$ion/combination appeared to be a
straightforward request.
Wellens moved, Turgeon seconded, Adl)pting,RESOLUTIONNO. 06-025, "A Resolution
Approving a Minor Subdivision/Combination (L6tL,ne)~earrangelheut) for Mark Sass, 22690 /
22740 Murray Street, and Breut Sinn, 6035 Galpin La\<e R(jad." lYlotion passed, 3/0.
Major Love returned to cO)1siderationofItem 6.A.
Turgeou moved, Wenelt~isefonded,,~dopting RESOLUTION NO. 06-026, "A Resolutiou Vacating
Certain Draiuage and UtilltYtEase.nwntsjn Zachary Woods." Motion passed 3/0.
; ,'...,...... ............;........
.....", -.....-.."',.
----.'" ---...-..."","'"',,',, ',.,.
,"""', -',,';-."',' -'.",<'",-;,'."C:,',;,,<<;'
Councilmember Turgeon thanked Mi; Sass and Mr. Sinn for their efforts.
7. PARks
A. R.eIW.rt on ParkCommission Meetiug Held March 15, 2006
...
Park Commissioner Davis reported on matters considered and actions taken at the Park Commission
Meeting of March 15,2006 (as detailed in the minutes of that meeting).
Councilmember Turgeon suggested the Park Commission may want to wait on activities regarding open
space until Council had determined the Park Commission's role.
Commissioner Davis stated the Commission was concerned with preservation of natural spaces (e.g.
wetlands, large spans of trees, etc.).
CITY OF SHOREWOODCOUNCIL MEETING
March 27, 2006
Page 4 of 10
Mayor Love stated through the LCEC (Land Conservation and Environment Committee), there had been
a definition of open spaces. He also stated there had been question as to whether or not the Park
Commission should be involved with natural spaces. Although he stated he could support the Park
Commission's involvement with natural spaces, no official action had been taken. Love stated because
the City did not have an environmental committee, it could make sense to include natural spaces as part
of the Park Commission's role. Love then asked Staff, on behalf of Council, to ensure the topic of the
Park Commission's role be placed on a City Council Work Session Agenda. Administrator Dawson
stated that topic would be placed on an April or May 2006 City Council Work Session Agenda, and a
joint meeting scheduled sometime after that.
Mayor Love explained one of the items that needed to be addressed
vocabulary for open spaces.
development of a common
Councilmember Wellens suggested the City take a long-term perspective on open spaces. He stated in the
mid-1930's Shorewood had been cleared farmland, and he stated as the City was developed it was filled
in with trees because people wanted to plant trees on their property.
Commissioner Davis stated the City needed to consider wHat the:l1\l1d was like prior the farmland
because the farmland had been engineered.
Mayor Love stated one of the problems in the!0itywas a loss of canopy, and when the Europeans arrived
the area was in a region called the "big woods".He:~!l~Ted there neediMU\o.pe agreement as to what time
period the City would want to measure its conse~vation;eff\'l;ts against. He suggested pre-settlement may
be the appropriate time period. He went on to statrtheI,pEC:l;\aq;qetennined some areas had become so
compacted there was no point iI1ad1ressing conservation in those areas.
With regard to the canppies and t~ee inventories, Council member Turgeon questioned if the Park
Commission was consltleringonly public space or if private properties also included. She stated she did
not think the City should be involved with private property trees.
CommissioO!~tDa"W!~t!lted it was jmportant to educate property owners on the positive benefits
removingcWuckthorn had on trees.
In re~poNs~:tp.a question froNq~ouncilmblnber Turgeon with regard to the species of trees to be planted
on Manor R6'a4mear Manor Patl>"Director Brown explained a proposed plan would be reviewed with the
Park Commiss'i6'n;)it its next ;meeting prior to presenting the plan to Council for its review and
consideration. Tutgeql1 stated!she understood the benefits of additional screening, but she did not
understand the con2brn!~e&a~ding undesirable activities occurring because of the additional screening.
Brown stated it was prud~iwto address that possibility each time some type of screening was considered.
B. Expenditure offunds for Manor Park Pond Project
Director Brown stated the Park Commission had recently reviewed Manor Park with regard to water
quality and the ongoing issue of goose droppings in and around the park. As a result of the review, the
Park Commission authorized Commission Westerlund to obtain proposals for the design and installation
of plantings around the Manor Park pond. He noted the purpose of the plantings was to deter geese from
the pond and playground structure.
CITY OF SHOREWOODCOUNCIL MEETING
March 27,2006
Page 5 of 10
Brown explained at a February 14, 2006, Park Commission Meeting, the Commission considered
proposals from Fortin Consulting Group and Kestrel Design Group, and he stated both firms were
reputable landscape design firms. He noted both proposals were included in the Council's meeting
packet.
Brown then explained because the request for the proposals did not include specific requirements, the
two proposals were significantly different and were therefore difficult to compare.
Brown stated the Park Commission's recommendation to Council was to move forward Fortin Consulting
to develop two concept plans on a not-to-exceed basis of $1 ,500, wit~f\1l1ding from the Park Capital
Improvement Program.
Mayor Love expressed concern with separating the design phase from the impkmentation phase, stating
the design was strongly tied to the implementation (e.g. as. What types of planting will be used, what
guarantees are provided, when would the plantings be!ordered, etc.). He stated based on his past
experience with that type of project it was difficult to separate the design and implementation. He also
noted both of the firms were reputable firms.
Director Brown stated had Staff prepared RFP's there would have been specific requirements for each
area. Because Commissioner Westerlund had significant experience working with the two firms, the
Commission did not involve Staff as the normal process for requesting proposals, which resulted in two
very different proposals from the two firms.
Councilmember Turgeon acknowledged the tremendo~~amQ\,n\.ofpark and planning experience the
Park Commissioners had. Nqiin~,th~ differences int~eproposals,.~he questioned what information had
been provided to the two,firms.'I'lIrg;eon stated COl.jncil relied on Staff to provide background on the
proposed project and th~tihad not happened. TurgeonSl.jggested the Commission complement the work of
the Staff and not work.jr<ll'pendenti.iof the Staff. Shl'also stated Council could not hold the Park
Commission for any cost overml)s onproject problems; ~tcould only hold Staff accountable.
", ..........::..::.:...:.:.::.,.::.
':<>::: .. ....".<>.':.;.,.,..:::.:
Turgeon \\,e\'t()jH()is~a.te<she had(ft~estion;""itlrregard to who would perform various tasks (Fortin
Consultirg,City Staff, the(!f'ark Commission, or volunteers), how much time the tasks would take, the
numbeno~,geese in the area, if there wemmore geese in there than in other parks, etc. Also, costs for
materials,sI.jR~ as mulch, werel1()t factored in. She questioned the impact Parkview Development had on
the phosph()TlI$;!evel of the Manor Park pond. Director Brown stated the phosphorus loading from the
development h~d.be.en addressedi~atisfactorily.
Commissioner Davis.r~viewl'd some of the differences between the two proposals, and she noted the
Kestrel proposal focusediql1planning.
Mayor Love stated he thought there was a need to resolve the water quality and geese droppings issue,
and he thought it should be resolved sooner rather than later. He stated when vegetation was removed, an
unnatural habitat for geese was created. He stated the Manor Park pond area could be a good test for that
type of project because the area could be contained. He went on to state following the defined process for
projects was imperative.
CITY OF SHOREWOODCOUNCIL MEETING
March 27,2006
Page 6 oflO
In response to a question from Councilmember Wellens, Administrator Dawson explained there was not
a threshold amount of cost for the project to be quoted or bid. He went on to explain the project should
follow the defined process for the Staff to coordinate the project on behalf of the Commission.
Discussion ensued with regard to the impact of directing Staff to follow the regular process for this
project.
In response to a question from Mayor Love, Director Brown stated it would take approximately 1 - I V,
weeks for Staff to prepare an RFP and approximately I - 2 weeks to receive the proposals. Once the
proposals had been received they would be reviewed by the Park Commissibn prior to being presented to
the Council for review and consideration.
Mayor Love directed Staff, on behalf of Council, to prepare an RFP. and solic'ftproposals for the Manor
Park pond project.
8. PLANNING
Planning Commissioner Meyer reported on matters coris~dcred{!arid actions taken the Planning
Commission Meeting of March 21, 2006. He stated three items were reviewed for recommendation: a
setback variance, a lot area variance, and a .subdivision/combinatib\j. He also stated Staff was going to
conduct an inventory of all "paper streets'" and Staff and the COlnru,ission would assess whether an
amendment to the setback requirements for "paper streets" should be recommended to Council for review
and consideration.
A. Setback Variauce
Applicant: Greg Buckley
Ll)cation: 25885 Birch Bluff Road
Director Nielsen stated theapRlicant,;<Arcg,.Buckley, owns the property at 25885 Birch Bluff Road. The
applicant had req\je,slcd a setbackyariancet(){b,uild:;all addition on the east side of his home, behind the
>-:i'>;:?:".... ..,::.,....... ....";c,
existing garagel ",.','n,l;.'l,> HII'
.. '.<"ii:,'" -';<>:
,-;., '"".,,".; .i"::'
,:;, -"",":', .:>,::
Direcw~'nf'lielsen explain~~!i:the stibj~cLproperty was located in the R-1 CIS, Single-Family
Resi<:lenfi~f(~J;toreland zoning'4i~trict and;lcontained approximately 21,781 square feet of area. The lot
was technicallY:acorner lot, having frontages on Birch Bluff Road and a "paper street", originally platted
as Second Stree~:mhe proposed two-story addition measured 8' x 24' and necessitated a 25-foot variance.
The required setbiteRfrom the Second Street right-of-way cuts the property approximately in half.
Nielsen went on to explairi the 35-foot setback required from Second Street severely limited the
buildability of the applicant's lot. If allowed a 10-foot setback from the right-of-way, the applicant had
adequate room to fill in the space behind the garage, which was already at a ten-foot setback. He noted at
the time the home was built, the City did not require the builder to observe a 35-foot setback.
Nielsen then explained there was ample precedent for granting the applicant's request for a variance.
The City had, on other occasions, granted similar variances for properties abutting fire lanes (platted
rights-of-way leading to lakeshore).
CITY OF SHOREWOODCOUNCIL MEETING
March 27, 2006
Page 7 of 10
Nielsen also eXplained the Second Street right-of-way was part of a small network of so-called "paper
streets" south of Birch Bluff Road. Second Street and Third Street, to the west, are north/south rights-of-
way, connected by Clara A venue, which runs east and west. A number of years ago, the City examined
the area in question relative to the future of these rights-of-way. The "Clara Avenue Study" concluded
that the streets were too substandard in width, did not respect topography, and houses were built too
close to them to upgrade them into standard City streets. Nevertheless, it was decided they would not be
vacated as they did provide limited access to three large parcels of land on the south side of Clara
Avenue. He noted they were very similar to the fire lanes that currently existed in Shorewood.
As in similar requests relative to fire lanes, the Planning Commission; recommended the applicant's
request for a variance be granted, treating the right-of-way in question as atypical side yard.
Turgeon moved, Wellens seconded, Adoptiug RESOLUTION NO. 06-02'7, "A Resolution Granting
a Setback Variance for Greg Buckley, 25885 Birch Bluff Road". Motiou passetl,3/0.
Director Nielsen stated Staff would conduct a study of tIle "paper streets" and idel1tiry!;which of them
could potentially be opened as a City street. The Commj~sion wouJd then review whether or not the
ordinance should be recommended to be amended to allow for fire lanes and "paper streets" to have a 10-
foot setback rather than deal with each of the requests on an individual basis.
B. Conditional Use Permit - Ae~~~sory Space in Excl1ss,l)f 1200 Square
Applicant: Blair Buo/"d!y"
Location: 28160 Boultl,er Btid'g~J),rive
.. '. -.""
Director Nielsen stated the applicant owned the propertY ~t 2S160!Soulder Bridge Drive. The applicants
wanted to add on to their existing attached garage. The floor area ofthc new garage, when combined with
an existing attached g~~"ge, brougl1(the total area of accessory space on the property over 1200 square
feet. Therefore, the applicants had requested a conditional use permit to construct accessory space in
excess of 1200 square feet 011 the. property.
Nielsen expl(l1hechtl1fmrogertywa;s'foned P.O.D./S, Planned Unit Development/Shoreland, and was
subject tpdSl10reland management requjrements. It contained 59,077 square feet of area. The existing
house,cPpt~ined approximately,3560 squarefeet of floor area in the two levels above grade. The existing
garage C01;l,~~iH~d 760 square fe;et of floor 'area. The proposed garage contained 810 square feet, which
would bring'the;total area of aCcllssory space on the site to 1570 square feet.
Nielsen then ex~ja.in.eq Sectiop)'1201.03 Subd.2.d.(4) of the Shorewood Zoning Code contained four
specific criteria for\lgtaWin,g\this type of conditional use pennit. He reviewed how the applicants'
proposal complied witHt<<~Code.
Nielsen stated the applicant's request was considered to be consistent with the requirements of the
Shorewood Zoning Code; therefore, the Planning Commission recommended the conditional use permit
be granted as requested.
Turgeon moved, Wellens seconded, Adopting RESOLUTION NO. 06-028, "A Resolution Grantiug
a Conditional Use Permit for Accessory Space Over 1200 Sq. Ft. for Blair Bury, 28160 Boulder
Bridge Drive." Motiou passed 3/0.
CITY OF SHOREWOODCOUNCIL MEETING
March 27, 2006
Page 8 of 10
C. Miuor Subdivisiou/Combination
Applicant: Mark Sass
Location: 22690/22740 Murray Street and 6035 Galpin Lake Road
This was discussed and approved under Item 6.A.
9. GENERAL/NEW BUSINESS
A. Approval of the Spring Clean-Up Coutract for Services
Item 9.A was moved from Item 3.E at the request of Council member Turg~()n.
Council member Turgeon suggested Council direct Staff to survey residerfts to assess whether the
property owners thought the services provided as part of the SPJ'ing Clean-up Day'\yere of value based on
what they had to pay. She suggested Council and Staff review what the goals and expectations for the
Spring Clean-up day prior are by 2006 year-end. She;'noted Minnetonka works inc()njunction with
Hennepin County to provide a household hazardous waste pQllection site.
Turgeon went on to state the volume of waste picked up on that day seemed to have declined over the
last few years, but she did not know the reason for the decline..Councilmember Wellens stated it may
have declined because of the market, and he ~tated some residentsl11ay feel it was unfair to pay for this
service if they did not have that type of refuse.
Mayor Love stated the service was to provide a n1eans fonprOp\)f<:lisPQsal of the refuse.
...... ."
.;'<<"" >......
Director Brown reviewed,l\'d(}c\.lll1~n;tthe Staff had'p;repared depiCting the gross costs for Spring Clean-
up collections for 2001mi2~05. He stl\tyd he believed the City should provide a means for proper disposal
of the refuse. He then statc<:l...Staff bel.i.e. ved the issue wa...s.. .11. ot whether or not there should be this type of
service; the issue was whJth~n.orn.6t,it,sllould be a:crtrb-side pick-up service or a drop-off user-fee
serVIce.
<",,':.';"
council~~fub~r;~r~~6n!,cfaRified shei'yas not suggesting the City eliminate the curb-side pick-up. She
only wanted resident feedback as to what type of Spring Clean-up Day services are most important to
them:
Administrator t:>awson stated the most expensive part of the Spring Clean-up Day service was the curb-
side pickup; the drop-off scenario would be substantially cheaper to provide.
Mayor Love agreed thgr~f~Hould be input from the residents; but he did not see a referendum on this
issue. He stated he would like to see the service expanded in some areas, and he would like to have the
City work more closely with Hennepin County on the collection and disposal of items such as paint,
chemicals, etc. He also stated it was important for the Council to view a collective benefit to the
community and not just individual benefits, noting there were times the individual resident may not
realize the benefit.
Councilmember Wellens stated if the City went to a drop-off service he would prefer to have two drop-
off locations.
CITY OF SHOREWOODCOUNCIL MEETING
March 27, 2006
Page 9 of 10
Turgeon moved, Wellens secouded, Approving the Spring Clean-Up Contract for Services with the
Understanding Couucil would Review the Goals and Expectatious of Providing this Service by
2006 Year-End. Motion passed 3/0.
10. ENGINEERING/PUBLIC WORKS
No Engineering or Public Works items were presented this evening.
11. STAFF AND COUNCIL REPORTS
A. Administrator & Staff
None.
B. Mayor & City Couucil
Mayor Love stated the hiring process for a new ExcelSibl"fjre DistrictFire Chief was
Mayor Love stated the EFD Firefighters had asked for a diffen~11t location for the fire boat. The new
owners of the Shorewood Yacht Club would ,be pleased to have thebpat be located there. Love explained
if the boat were to reside at the Yacht Club the! owners of the Yachtqlub, on behalf of the firefighters,
would have to apply for two items: I) an amendl11enttRthe C.U.P. so the fire boat would not be counted
as one of the four motorized boats allowed in its c.U;P.;aJj(l 2) the fireboat should not be part of the
City's licensing fee.
Administrator Dawson explainedtheLMCD does gt'ant exceptions to public safety boats; the boats do
not count against the amhorized boatstorage units.
Councilmember Turgeon q\1e~ti(med,~hi\qre importan~ewas for having the fire boat at the Shorewood
Yacht Club versUs at the Tonka'l3'ay'ddcKSF'':.
;:;:";,i!:i',;;,:;i::':,. "<iF:
.,.;:............ ,..:.<>:.:<:.... "".'"
Mayor ~9,"~explainedthe,nminim~111'~a,ke" distance from the Shorewood Yacht Club to an open water
area '!Yi\~'sHbstantially shorterth,an it wOHlqbe if the fire boat were docked at the Tonka Bay docks; time
was bftlili!e~s,ence in an emergency.
Mayor Love st,it~c1his intent wasito alert Council this topic would be on a future agenda.
Administrator Dawsoff!Lnot.dthe next meeting of the EFD Governing Board was scheduled for
Wednesday April 26, 2(}Op\llt 6:00 P.M. at the West Side Station.
CITY OF SHOREWOODCOUNCIL MEETING
March 27, 2006
Page 10 of 10
ADJOURN
Turgeon moved, Wellens seconded, Adjourning the Regular City Council Meeting of March 27,
2006,8:24 P.M. Motiou passed 3/0.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,
Christine Freeman, Recorder
Woody Love; Mayor
ATTEST:
Craig W. Dawson, City Administrator/Clerk
PAYABLESAPPROVALS
For 04/10/06 Council Meeting
\. l c_/ /; / r /1 ;; ,
Prepared by: 'bfli: - ;:.:;3~ Date: ~r;,
Michelle T. Ngu nfSr. Accounting Clerk
6 /J. ~.'
J/l < .. .
Reviewed by: f( ''--tea"-<-- aVe/OlC Date: {titl, tl6 t'{c
Bonnie Burton, F ance Director
d /
//
Approved by:
Crai
Date: [II.PlOi
awson, City Administrator
-jf'3/i
PAYROLL APPROVALS
For 04110/06 Council Meeting
Prepared by:, ~
,
Michelle T. Nguyen, S .
!2 ,1 .
I:">>U1LC<- f(]~)A__lvvc
, Date: ~
counting Clerk
Date: (!!J;.fft.6 d ~
Reviewed by:
Bonnie Burton, Fi9JlPce Director
./ !
x ,/./.
/
Approved by:
cri awson, City Administrator
Date: tT/fJ tJ./
CITY OF
SHOREWOOD
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD' SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927' (952) 474-3236
FAX (952) 474-0128. www.cLshorewood.mn.us. cityhall@ci.shorewood.mn.us
Celebrating 50 Years' 1956 - 2006
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
Apri13,2006
RE:
Mayor and Council Members
Jean Panchyshyn, Executive Secretary/Deputy Clerk ~
Craig W. Dawson, City Administrator aD
Apprl)ving a Biennial Gambling Permit fl)r the American Legion NI). 259
TO:
FROM:
cc:
The American Legion Post No, 259 has held a Biennial Gambling License for the past several
years. It is time for them to renew their license for the next two years, as the current license
expires on June 30, 2006. The State of Minnesota Gambling Control Board requires a resolution
of approval from the City in which the site is location.
As appropriate fees have been paid, and there have been no gambling violations within the past
two years, approval of a resolution is in order.
Recl)mmend Cl)unci! Actil)n
Adoption of a Resolution Approving the Biennial Gambling License for the American Legion
Post 259.
-+!-- '.}
:'rr.~) C
n
'.J PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
RESOLUTION NO. 06-_
A RESOLUTION APPROVING A GAMBLING LICENSE
WHEREAS, the Shorewood City Code, Chapter 301, provides for the licensing
of certain gambling activities in the City; and
WHEREAS, the City prescribes certain restrictions concerning eligibility for such
licensing and application, whereby the licensee will hold the City harmless for all claims
arising out of the granting of such license; and
WHEREAS, the following applicant has met the eligibility requirements for such
a license and have agreed to all terms and conditions of the agreement contained in the
license,
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of
Shorewood, as follows:
That a license for the conduct of gambling as specified in the terms and conditions
of the license be issued to the American Legion Post #259, 24450 Smithtown
Road, Shorewood, MN, 55331, for a term beginning July 1,2006 and ending June
30, 2008.
ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Shorewood this 10th day
of April 2006.
Woody Love, Mayor
ATTEST:
Craig W. Dawson, City Administrator
CITY OF
SHOREWOOD
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD' SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927' (952) 474-3236
FAX (952) 474-0128 . www.ci.shorewood.mn.us . cityhall@ci.shorewood.mn.us
Celebrating 50 Years' 1956 - 2006
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Mayor and City Council
Craig Dawson, City Administrator
~/
FROM:
Larry Brown, Director of Public Works
DATE:
April 6, 2006
RE:
Resolution Accepting Plans Specifications and Estimate and Authorizing
Advertisement for Bids for Bituminous Sea1coating of Streets for the Year 2006.
Each year the City of Shorewood encumbers $65,000 of the operating budget for the sea1coating of
roadways within the City. Year 2006 is no exception. Attachment 1 is a map of the roadways to be
sea1coated this year.
The Cities of Shorewood and Tonka Bay are letting a joint sea1coating project. This will allow the
cities to take advantage of economies of scale.
The total budgeted amount is comprised of two a major components. The first component is the
purchase of the sea1coat rock. The City Council has already contracted for the sea1coat rock for
Shorewood,
The remainder of the total budgeted amount is the portion for sweeping of roadways, furnishing and
application of bituminous oil on the roadways, and the placement of owner furnished sea1coat rock.
This component is the piece that has yet to be advertised and publicly bid.
Therefore the attached resolution approves the plans and specifications for such services and
authorizes the advertisement for bids. If approved, the bid opening for this project is scheduled for
10:00 a.m., Wednesday, May 3, 2005.
Recl)mmendation
Staff is recommending that the attached resolution be adopted that approves the plans specifications
and estimate for the Bituminous Sea1coating of Streets for the Year 2006, and authOlizes
advertisement for bids.
,.
f: "PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
...
rft
"'ft D
2006 Seal Coating Street List
Wood Duck Circle
Charleston Circle
Glencoe Road
Park Street
Chaska Road
Murray Hill Road
Summit Ave
Mayflower Rd
Galpin Lake Road
Murray Court
Cardinal Drive
Bracketts Road
GRANT 5r.
Stratford Place
Deer Ridge
Murray Street
Sr. Center Parking Lot - ,",oT S>lo.....N
N
'l/
GALPII\I
LAKE
1723
"
11BO
.110
Mas
&"00
"''''Il"J<l """", SI 2006
~ "" ""
,~. BI1UM1NOUS SEAL COAT
"'" AREA MAP
~ 0.0. Dr STREETS 18
,,"""""'......., CITY or CITY PROJECT NO. 06 02
'" 05/'7/06 SHDRE\.IDDD
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
RESOLUTION NO. 06-_
A RESOLUTION APPROVING SPECIFICATIONS AND ESTIMATE AND
AUTHORIZING ADVERTISEMENTS FOR BIDS
FOR BITUMINOUS SEAL COAT PROJECT 2006
WHEREAS, the City of Shorewood designates $65,000 for seal coating each year; and
WHEREAS, the Director of Public Works has identified streets within the City that need
bituminous seal coating; and
WHEREAS, the Director of Public Works has prepared Specifications and Estimate
dated April 10th, 2006 for ajoint project within the Cities of Shorewood and Tonka Bay for the
2006 Bituminous Seal Coating of Streets,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Shorewood, Minnesota:
1. The Specifications and Estimate was prepared by the Director of Public Works for
such improvement. Said Specifications and Estimate are hereby approved and
shall be filed with the City Clerk.
2, The City Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official paper and in
Construction Bulletin an advertisement for bids, attached hereto as Exhibit A,
upon the making of such improvement under such approved plans and
specifications, The advertisement shall be published for 2 weeks, shall specify the
work to be done, shall state that bids will be opened and considered by the
Council at 10:00 a.m. (CST), on May 3, 2006, in the City Hall Council Chambers,
and that no bids will be considered unless sealed and filed with the Clerk and
accompanied by a cash deposit, cashier's check, bid bond, or certified check
payable to the Clerk for 5 percent of the amount of each bid.
ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD this 14th
day of April, 2006.
WOODY LOVE, MAYOR
ATTEST:
CRAG W. DAWSON, CITY ADMINISTRATOR
ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS
2006 Bituminl)us Seal Cl)ating of Streets
Fl)r the Cities I)f
Shl)rewl)l)d and Tonka Bay
Minnesl)ta
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that sealed proposals will be received at the City Clerk's Office in
the City of Shorewood, Hennepin County, Minnesota at the Shorewood City Hall, 5755 Country
Club Road, Shorewood, Minnesota 55331, until 10:00 A.M. I)n Wed., the 3rd day of May, 2006
and will be publicly opened at said time and place by two or more designated officers or agents of
the Cities of Shorewood and Tonka Bay, Said proposal to be for the furnishing and placement of
Bituminous Material and all labor for the placement of owner furnished Seal coat Aggregate,
1200 TON
18000 GAL
Placement of Owner Furnished FA- 2 Grey Granite Seal Coat Aggregate
Cl)ntractl)r Furnished CRS - 2 Bituminous Material for Seal Coat
Proposals ani ving after the designated time will be returned unopened.
The bids must be submitted on the proposal form provided in accordance with the contract
documents, plans and specifications as prepared by the City of Shorewood, 5755 Country Club
Road, Shorewood, Minnesota 55331, which are on file with the City Clerk of the City of
Shorewood.
Copies of Proposal Form Specifications for use by the contractors submitting a bid may be obtained
from City Hall, City of Shorewood, 5755 Country Club Rd, Shorewood, Minnesota 55331, upon a
deposit (non-refundable) of Twenty Five Dollars and No Cents ( $ 25,00 ) per set.
No Bids will be considered unless sealed and endorsed upon the outside wrapper, " BID FOR 2006
BITUMINOUS SEAL COATING OF STREETS" and filed with the City Clerk of the City of
Shorewood and accompanied by a cashier's check, payable to the City of Shorewood for 5% of the
amount of the bid to be forfeited as liquidated damages in the event the bid is accepted and the
bidder should fail to enter promptly into a written contract an furnish the required bonds.
The Cities of Shorewood, Tonka Bay and Excelsior reserve the right to reject any and all bids, No
bids may be withdrawn for a period of ( 30 ) days from the date of opening the bids,
Date: April 10, 2006
BY:
ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL
Craig W, Dawson, City Administrator
PUBLISHED IN:
The "Construction Bulletin
The" Sun Sailor"
April 21st & April 28th ,2006
Aplil 20th & April 27th ,2006
2006 Bituminl)us Seal Coating
AFB
CITY OF
SHOREWOOD
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD' SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927' (952) 474-3236
FAX (952) 474-0128. www.cLshorewood.mn.us . cityhall@cl.shorewood.mn.us
Celebrating 50 Years' 1956 - 2006
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
April 4, 2006
TO:
Mayor and City Council Members
Jean Panchyshyn, Executive Secretary/Deputy Clerk -j:p
Craig W. Dawson, City Administrator ~
APPROVAL OF EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS FOR
DOCUMENT IMAGING SYSTEM ENHANCEMENTS
FROM:
CC:
RE:
The 2006 Budget includes funds for Laserfiche WebLink, and for Programming Services
to create a database for the City's property files-both enhancements to the City's existing
Laserfiche Document Imaging System,
Staff has been scanning documents during the past year, and there are now several
documents in the repository that can be made available for public access via the City's website
and the Laserfiche Weblink software, Laserfiche WebLink provides a secure, read-only gateway
between the City's Laserfiche document repository and the City's website; it does not require
additional file storage space from the City's existing Web Host provider. WebLink provides
self-serve access for authorized staff, clients and the public, to those documents made available
online, such as current and prior year's Agenda Packets, Minutes, Resolutions, Ordinances,
Annual Budget and Audit Reports, etc. The City will be able to retain complete control over
what documents are made available for public access online, Again, documents made available
will be secure and read-only. WebLink provides:
· Complete search and browse capabilities to find documents quickly and precisely,
· Browser and platform independence to work across a wide variety of Web browsers and
operating systems.
. On-demand PDF publishing,
. Excellent performance over low-bandwidth connections.
The second item noted in the 2006 Budget relating to Document Imaging is for
Programming Services to create a database for the City's property files. The Programming
Services will create a property file structure by address for each property in the City, and it will
include additional information in the template field for each property, such as the Property
Identification Number (PIN), Creation of this database will allow Staffto efficiently begin
scanning the property files into the Laserfiche repository.
....
f: , PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
...
# ~ ~~
f ,_) f:::.
April 4, 2006
Page Two
Financial
Laserfiche had a special offer for free Retrieval User Licenses, which expired on March
31. In order to take advantage of this special offer from Laserfiche, Staff submitted a purchase
order on March 30 for the Weblink Software, 8 Retrieval User Licenses, and software and
license maintenance, The savings to the City for the 8 Retrieval User Licenses is $360.00 for
each license, for a total savings of $1,780.00,
The cost for the Laserfiche WebLink software and annual software and license
maintenance is approximately $10,099.00; the cost for the Property File Structure Programming
Services is $750.00 (for a total cost of$10,849,OO). Sufficient funds are available in the 2006
Budget for both of these items.
City Council Actil)n
Staff recommends that the Council authorize expenditure of funds in the aml)unt I)f
apprl)ximately $10,849.00 fl)r Dl)cument Imaging enhancements, as described abl)ve.
CITY OF
SHOREWOOD
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD. SHOREWOOD, MmNESOTA 55331-8927. (952) 474-3236
FAX (952) 474-0128. www.c!.shorewOod.mn.us . cityhall@cLshorewood.mn.us
Celebratmg 50 Years. 1956 - 2006 .
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
April 7, 2006
TO:
Mayor and City Council Members
FROM:
Jean Panchyshyn, Executive Secretary/Deputy Clerk
CC:
Craig W. Dawson, City Administrator
RE:
TEMPORARY GAMBLING LICENSE - Lake Minnetonka Excelsior
Rotary Club
A request for a Temporary Gambling License arrived today, April 7', from the Lake
MinnetonkalExcelsior Rotary Cll.lb. The Rotary Club is respectfully requesting Council
consideration this Temporary Gambling License request at Council's meeting on Monday.
Therefore, this item will be added to the April 10 Council meeting agenda on Monday evening.
The Lake MinnetonkalExcelsior Rotary Club will be holding its annual charity golftournament
at the Minnetonka Country Club on August 21, 2006. They will be conducti~g a raffle drawing
at this event. They would like to begin selling raffles on April 21, 2006. To do so, they need
City and State approval for a Temporary Gambling License.
The President of the Lake MinnetonkalExcelsior Rotary Club will be p~esent Monday even\ng,
should there be any questions from Council.
COUNCIL ACTION \
Adoption of a Resolution Approving the Temporary Gambling License for the Lake
Minnetonl<.alExcelsior Rotary Club, for a raffle drawing to take place on Monday, August21,
2006, at the Minnetonka Country Club, 24575 Smithtown Road in S40rewood;
~. .
'..J PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
Add;+;o A
~3F
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
RESOLUTION NO. 06-_
A RESOLUTION APPROVING
A TEMPORARY GAMBLING LICENSE
WHEREAS, the Shorewood City Code, Chapter 301, provides for the licensing of
certain gambling activities in the City; and
WHEREAS, the City prescribes certain restrictions concerning eligibility for such
licensing and application, whereby the licensee will hold the City harmless for all claims
arising out of the granting of such license; and
WHEREAS, the following applicant has met the eligibility requirements for such a
license and has agreed to all terms and conditions of the agreement contained in the
license.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Shorewood as follows:
That a single temporary license for the conduct of gambling as specified in the
terms and conditions of the license be issued to Lake Minnetonka /Excelsior Rotary
Club. Said raffle to be held on Monday, August 21, 2006, at the Minnetonka
Country Club, 24575 Smithtown Road, Shorewood, MN 55331.
2006.
ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Shorewood this 10th day of April,
ATTEST:
WOODY LOVE, MAYOR
CRAIG W. DAWSON, CITY ADMINISTRATOR/CLERK
.
.
.
~~ETOk
/ l1"~~
i.o. ~ O"r
<\>l"l'Y f>'Q<>
Minnetonka Community Education Staff
. Full Time (30 hrs. or more) - 66
. Part Time (10-29 hrs.) - 35
. Part Time (less than 10 hrs.) -120
. Seasonal - 56
. Total MCE Staff - 277
Changes Made In 18 Months
. New Organizational Chart - Jan '05
. New Comprehensive Policy for CE - Oct. '04
. Streamlined Leadership, 3 Coordinators, down from 4
. ~::. igg descriptions for Executive Director and Coordinators -
. An Advisory Council with greater inclusion from more District
partners - Jan. '05
. District Wide Needs Assessment (Fall '06)
. Consistencies in fees. marketing, evaluations and hiring
. Executive Director working closely wijh the Superintendent
. Remodeled the Deephaven Education Center Approx. $200,000 -
Oct. '05
Community Education
Program History
Governor Levander
voiced support for
Commun~y Education
at the Lighted Schools
Conference
MCE Began
MCE - ECFE
Program Began
. 1973-1996
. 1996-2004
. 2004-
My Findings on 9-22-04
. Many outstanding Community Education
programs
. Staff - willing, ready and waiting for new
leadership
. More program evaluation necessary
. Few Executive Director program/staff files
. A budget prepared and controlled outside
of the Executive Director's office
MCE Executive
Director History
Jim Jones
Dan KuzIik
Tim Lilfin
Changes Made In 18 Months Cont.
. Relocated CE Staff from DSC to DEC - Oct. '05
. New Name - Minnetonka Commun~y Education - Jan. '06
. New Website - minnetonkacommunijyed.org - Jan. '06
. Clerical. Reorganized and more efficient. From 7.07 FTE to 5.65
. Human Resource Department:
. Used and appreciated by MCE
. All hiring's and postings go through HR
. "New" YDC - Youth Development Council @ MHS:
16 member group of 9-12 grade studen1S
S'" Grade Fiesta - An opportunity to meet other incoming 6'" grade
studen1S from other elementary schools. 80% attendance.
Leadership and commun~ focus
1
::L fem 5
.
.
.
ptember 2004
. "New" Youth Triathlon 5-7-05. 2006 event will be
Saturday, May 6.
. 101 participants
. Fabulous Comments and Evaluations..
. Dr. Gerald Swanson (grandfather). "I appreciate your efforts to
organize the triathlon to encolXage children to letrn the positive end
results of such exercise as patt of /heir development."
. Carla La Vera (parent). "As a marathoner I appreciate /he time,
effort and energy /hat goes inlo organizing a race. Both my boys had
a terrific/great time. They want 10 be at the starting line next year.
Job well done!"
. Lynn Johnson (\iOIunteer). "Good community feel to it. Well
organized. I'll be back next year. "
New - On August 5, 2006
C)~
TourdeTonka
15-25-65 Mile Ride Options
More Changes Since September 2004
. "New" Tiny Tonka T-Ball:
. 96 - 3 & 4 yr. old participants in 2005
. "New" Explorer's Program Study & Parent Mtg.:
. First parent meeting since 1993...1-31-05
. The parent meeting and survey led to..
. Sijes open at 6:30 a.m. not 6:45 a.m.
. Affirmation of staff and program
. Healthier snack choices
. Support for the first fee increase in 4 years
More Changes Since September 2004
. Budget:
. Director led and driven
. A team approach with the Coordinators
. A reality based budget
. No budget transfers or misrepresented use
of levy dollars to protect a loss
2
.
.
.
Budget Information
. MCE Budget consists of...
. 75% fee based pro9rammin9
. 25% levy and aid dollars
. State General Community Education Levy...
. 1987 to 2003... Frozen @ $5.95 per person
. 2003... reduced to $5.23 (a loss of approx. $36.000 per year)
. 2005 increased to $5.42
. Early Childhood and Family Education Levy/Aid...
. In 2003 this was reduced from $120. to $96. per every 0-4 year
olds in the District (a loss of approx. $89,000 per year)
.2005 increased to $104.00
. Hetp families meet the chaJlenges
of parenting by providing
information, friendship. and
support.
. To provide opportunities to build
positive and fun parent/child
relationships.
. To provide child development,
parenting and oommunity resource
infonnation for parents.
. To begin an effecllve and satisfying
school/home partnership.
. Minnetonka Heights
. Stratford Woods
. Cargill
Minnetonka Communi y Education
Three Core Areas of Programming
Young Learners. ECFE & Preschool, etc.
Youth Programs
Adult Programs
. 90 minute classes
. Y, parenVchild
. Y, parent discussion
ES
. Six 3 Yr-old Classes
. Five 4 Yr-old Classes
. First school experience
for ELL families
3
.
.
.
3 Yr. Olds
Various locations:
.Preschools
.Deephaven Education
Center
.Elementary Schools
. Academic support
. After school programs
. Aquatics
. Driver Education
. Explorers Club
. Extended Day K
. Music Academy
. Recreation
. Youth Development Council
. Zero Hour
. American Red Cross
swimming lessons
. Lifeguard training
. Beach programs
. Open swim
. Swim team & Masters
. Water Aerobics
. Provides resources,
workshops,
. In-services,
. Parent Fair
. Tonka Cares
. Community Book
Reads
rograms
. Over 200 students registered for tutoring
. Over 400 enrolled in review and test prep classes
. Over 250 children participated in theater programs last
summer.
. Clear Springs Chess Club won 1st place at the state
tournament.
. 01 team won second place at the international
tournament!
4
.
eadem.:!
Private and group lessons
Kindermusik
. Zero Hour lessons
. Summer instrument clinics
Performances and recitals
Summer "Quick Start" band and orchestra
.
. Babysitter Training
. Band & orchestra lessons
. Cartoon drawing
. Hip Hop
. Spanish
. Sports hour
. Yoga
.
. Evaluate and collect more data
. Affirm, celebrate and support what is good
. Recognize and change what is not
. Delete as needed
. Add and grow at every step along the way
. Fine tune all decision making
. Hire quamy staff
. Director and Coordinator involvement through out
. Get involved - Anything is possible
Adult Programs
. Adult Enrichment
. Project Soar (Adults with Disabilities)
. ABElELL
. Volunteers in the schools
. Parent Resource Center @ MHS
. Career Resource Center @ MHS
. CE Catalog - out to over 30,000 homes
Minnetonka Community Education 2006
Thank you for the opportunity to present
to you tonight. I am excited about the
future of CEo -,,\~ETo4>:
2~"~~~\
$ l~ ~
~ . ,,'"
4>:)"TY v,~<J
. What would life be if we had no courage to
attempt anything?"
...VincentVan Gogh
5
CITY OF
SHOREWOOD
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD' SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927' (952) 474-3236
FAX (952) 474-0128. www.ci.shorewood.mn.us . cityhall@cLshorewood.mn.us
Celebrating 50 Years' 1956 - 2006
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Planning Commission, Mayor and City Council
FROM:
Brad Nielsen
DATE:
31 March 2006
RE:
Meldahl, Ann - Setack for Lot Area/Minor Subdivision (Second
Revision)
FILE NO.:
405 (05.28)
BACKGROUND
In October oflast year, Ann Meldahl and her husband submitted an application for a
minor subdivision to resubdivide their property at 6180 Cathcart Drive into two lots,
That request was addressed in a staff memorandum, dated 27 October 2005 (copied in
yellow and attached as Exhibit A), Before any action could be taken, the Meldahls asked
for that application to put on hold, pending their submittal of a lot area variance and a
different lot configuration, They have now submitted a new plan (see Exhibit B) and a
request for a lot area variance of 10,000 square feet for the northerly parcel. They explain
their request on Exhibit C,
ANALYSIS/RECOMMENDATION
While there are several specific criteria set forth in the Zoning Code and state statutes
regarding the granting of variances, the first and simplest question to be answered is - can
it be done without a variance? In this case, the applicants have already answered that
with their 2005 application, The division shown in that application complies with the
width, depth and area requirements for the R-IA zoning district. It also allows a home to
be built exactly where the applicants suggest is the best spot on the property - the higher
ground adjoining Cathcart Drive, It also provides more buildable area for the northerly
n
t: t PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
...
84,
Memorandum
Re: Meldahl Variance/Minor Subdivision
31 March 2006
lot than would be provided if the variance were granted. This is considered to be a very
reasonable use of the applicants' property. With respect to the criteria set forth in Section
1201.05 Subd. 2.b, of the Zoning Code, the request fails as follows:
1, The applicants are not being deprived of rights commonly enjoyed by properties
in the same district. A review of the area in which the property shows that the lots
in the western half of Planning District 4 are at least 40,000 square feet in area,
While lots lying east of the LRT Trail are smaller in size, they are located in
different zoning districts (R-lD and R-IC).
2, The existing lot configurations are the result of how the applicants themselves
divided the property in 1991. As such, if there is any hardship, it has been self-
imposed.
Based upon the preceding, the applicants are able to make reasonable use of their property
without a reduction in the City's standard lot size. It is worth noting that in discussions
with the applicants, much of their concerns has more to do with the aesthetics of having
the northerly parcel cut behind the southerly parcel. If the rear view of the existing home
is of great concern, this could be handled by the applicant placing a "sight or scenic
easement over the portion of the northerly lot that would affect any view. This could
restrict construction or preserve vegetation, or both,
Approval ofthe lot area variance is not recommended, Rather, the Planning Commission
should recommend approval of the minor subdivision application submitted last autumn,
subject to the conditions included in the 27 October 2005 staff report.
Cc: Craig Dawson
Tim Keane
Ann Meldahl
-2-
o
,,0
"
0::
o
u...
C;j~
~~
~<r:
u... ,-.., (/) <(
o 1--1 w I-
w~50
I- r~., <( (/)
<( I-'-l w
u::g<(z
u... I- Z
- I:::2:
I- (/)
ffi Z <( r:-
U 3:1-
wz
oZz:::>
z Zo
<(<r::::2:U
6 N'Z
- Q...
(/) _0..,} I- w
>OQoz
o ....JQ
I-ZZI
3~
80
g:;~
Q...
o
0::
Q...
"'.
"'~I
~
o
o
Q'p
'1"<e 0 <y):
4'<?, ~p ..-(
0<Y:<e
V ,<1')-:/<%
1z ~ 01-'
~4';oYJ <C9 p
1"<p; <Y<y
'l
~~
iS~
~~
J
..
,/
~
~
u~
~9
-----
OZ'LLl
~~o
>- n
!Il ~
1:h~
.~; I N 000l<;~ ;i
I 3~ * i
i;;~ _~
I ~~ (\
I.~ ~
.- d ~ w ~.i
i--... ^ IfJcID 0~g
~ I ---- ---- ~ U .~ ~ g ~ - ~~ ~
'1 ~"'1 · f, ..' !:
I ", ~ ~ ~ \__... '" ~t--/'ir---------_A
o. I " ____ ____ ~.~ ~on ~
--./ L~----....... --<l_~ if'.!
~ ~--?st---------------ik~ij
~--... --;-f?-!'-r-~- ----~-I:D----------=:::.-/ \ I
--... ---'!~-: yf'~-- ---_-..1..'___ ~~ ~ 1
: 0.1'-1 "" i '~i i ~, """.~~L ..~~ ~ __li;~ -.::- iA ;~-. -- ;~l I
.q- t- !J;! i;:~ " $- --=~--'"", - l;~l,.... _j;: I a'.
~ I : ~ --... ~ !l<:il .,...ifJ..:: - / \ II E-<
o I : '" !~ ---- ~~ ;~, r U)
~ ~I ~ s\, i ~@. ~~ ~-.--?\------\ \ 10
[/) ~I 5" ,,_5~; ~g p..SI':1 ,:g L.J..~
:g~ - g" ; if' iil:::~ i:: \, ,,-<,* I I C\2
II ~~: ;; ~~p..A...:! : ~ "~:;)' , It I:
' ~~! ~; -.- ~ 1 U)
, o. I ~~~ gs : -4 \ \,~ / I r:z::l
" -l w.'~l J...~ _ _ _ _ _ ~\.: 4.z l;::
." : :9v"LZl -I--~-;L--
, x )( ~" I~~
i- - t~ I~~
---- OO'h:I:---ffl___-~3:,Ll,LvoZO N olg
---- -----",----;.... / I
--- . '~
-----"-'-6--- ~" ~~ ',--/ I
,'- ...JV! WZ
~o 8~ I
Vl~ @5r-
~u ~~ I
~~ I
~i 1
bo I
z>-
lJ I S'9~
I
/
/0
/ ~
J I')
N
"__... 1
--1- -_
:--
1
I
1
1
I
1
1
).
.......
~...........
:tl
,;
on
..,
0>
'"
i1!
...
!!!~"
>- '.
~ '.
o
"
:I:~
""
ti~
~~
.,:'~~;: .<~.:.;.. ~~
I 3~
': ~~
I !! ~,~
L-J__L____J__
---
,
<i
t
w
05
~ '0
w t
.)! w
~
0 ~
0 ~
'" w
w
~
05 0
, 0
0 '"
(Il
w .e
.e
~ ~
,
~ 0
0 (Il
05 w
.e
_ ~
0
c '0
'"
c 05
~ _
0.
c
-0 "
~
0 c
" 0
w ~
c
C 0.
" W
_
w
f:- 05
c "
,
0. .)!
U
C '"
'0- '"
w <0
c '"
c ....
w
I ~
"
,,; w
t '"
U w
<( 05
0
:E '0
.
0 ~
. "
w 0
c w
c '"
?- c
~
. ~
~~
~ti
~
!
N
~ -0
0 ~
...J 0
00
'0 w
c
c
~ "
_
0 f:-
0.
~ C
0 ,
05 0
u
'0 c
'0-
~ w
w c
.)! c
w
'" I
'" ,,;
<0 w
'" _
.. U
<(
~
. 0
w :e
'" 00
(Il w 0
.
z 05 w
0 c
>= '0 c
0. "
0:: ~
u w
(Il w N
w ~
0 '" ~
...J .. '"": ".3
<( ...J~...J
'" WNW.......
W 0'-00
...J 0: o:~
'" <(.....<(....
z o..;go.. ~
>= I-w\-......
(Il (f) ~(fJ 0
X W.c<(.c
W ~\-WI-
N
w
~~
o~ .
...J '"
C
" o~
.- 0
0~...J
" c
........0:-52
00.0
"
(Il
z
o
>=
Q"
0:
U
(Il
W
o
...J
<(
'"
W
...J
CC
,_ 0
o~
o..~
"
o
E"
o.)!
_
~,-,
c"1
.'"
0",
-6'-'
~V;
._ w
-'"
o
"
o'~
"'~
-Co
w
.ew
t.S:
0.-
c~
00
"0
~w
. w ,
N:5N
~c~
.305
"~,,
'6'S.o
cn&tIl
'00'0
~Qw
w~ C
ll) :.=
-N..c
~o~
",...Jz
lB:2 v
o~
~ .~
.
w~~
~ 0::::
.
w _
~ w~
~ C W
-w
'oS....
............rri
m. ,
00",
w w",
05,-,
"'-
C o~
~z~
_ w'"
- ~
0.......41
~ .e
OE~
~o.......
c"::: 0
C
.- >,41
::2:-c,S:
.w-
"'.e~
~~.
c, 0
ggw
u "
c ~'6
'a..2{1)
w ~
co 0
Co
w . C
IOo
N._
ui-'-u
w~ w
_ C 00
U 0-
<(~w
.~
0'- C
".-
:eNw
" .e
o ~
.~
wOE
E.....J 0
'--0 '-
~._.......
_ 0
- 00 '"
- -c
N~ w
o~
"041:;"0-:2
.....J.....J c O.....J-l 0 0
w_=cnw......,btll
~oC;;Q}~o~,o
~t8.2o:t:5l1.l
o O:lc
:r: Q.~~:c c..g:.:
~o......r--.:~o-o1il
O.ccNO..cco
Z\-0....U11-0W
~Q
W ~
wO.o
~~
w
o -c
oC"-l:.:
r'........c
~ o~
...J-
~ 0.
~"z
,.-
QOW
(Il .~
~~
wQ~
~ ~
...... ....'-
'+- ~ ~
o_~
ow
~ U W
~ ~
-~
0. 00,-,
co",
~alui
N:5t!)
o 5t"1
...Jz~
"
" W w
'5:53:
. w
~E~
oo~
_
~~~
w '" 0.
.21:Q)
w C
1"j.J:::..:
U1'S......
'" o.
'" . 0
,-,~w
1il ~:-s2
w~ 0
'" .
g~
W'O
:5~c
_0
'+- :;:;
Q~ U
c w
~ o.
.~ _
O. .
v:.o-c:
'" ,-
,s:Nlll
"'~~
- Q~
_...J
=0-0 E
~Q'o ~
. .~
w~ '"
E oi:
,_ w
::;:~:S
~.- :;)
"'- 0
~~.
Coo
"o~
8w~
w~
.S:..c:tD
o.~..
~ co'"
C N
W ~
I~~
.S: C
-0. 0
~ o.1i)
_ ,-
uo"
<( En>
00 w
~ -~
.e~
~cn
3:3:U1
Wo'"
c _'"
.S:-On
~v......
~~:2 ~
No'"
o
w
(Il
o
0.
o
0:
0..
E E
.3 E::1
.g.3"O
Qi.g~ ~
>- ~ "0
~~.!! -0
g~ 0 -0
{I) g ~ E
€lUlc ~
vco tIl
E~E 0
c: E ~ e
0. w
:g ~~ 6
>=.... c a.
al ::10::1
w5.B:;:;-o
......B6g~
~ &.5 u~.l:
~ Ul U-o
8: 0'10'>Q) ~Q)
EE:E~go
C Ul lfJ 0.,_ C
o 'x 'x ~ ~ 3:
,= IV Ql 0.-0 0
.e
UlUlUllfJU'lW
Q)QlQ)QlQ)
...........................Ul
000000'1
~~~~~,s:
-0-0-0-0-00
W
;ilF
B
"'
o
~I
~~
OJ
6t!:
z~
~o
'0
W
00
0.
0.
0.
_
0.,
.
.~
.ec
~w
"E
c~
o g
_0
. _
"'u
c C
'OQ)
>=....
110
",.
.Sc
~w
.~ E
~~
w~
Wo.
l'E
~.-
~-
Q~
~
50
:g2
Uo
.2
.
W 0.
~~
~m
';'0
13:
0._
e8.
0.5
'00.
w~
:80
b c
~ ;:.l
'00
W"
>~
0-
.0.
o C
o
w w
:S~
~
'0:
S1~
'C 0\
.g.s
c'O
5:~
.0"
w"
~w
~.
o
.0.
'0
Ea
.0
>.~
~ 0
>
"
..
~"
~~~~
el:"CI ~
~~i~
g~~~
Bi~'5
~~.!E
g.:a ~~
g~'2i=
...~..'l;
D"CI e!l!
El:Q.~
'll-
'lii15fil~
=Gil:...
~Eh
8~~5
nn
t3. ill
Q Z~ mill
Z-~ui~~
0( ~Z~~w
U1~~z5
I!Il11zw~~_
It: I-w~D.9~
III (l!I::Jwo:~
-ztll!-o"t
D1t35oiii~:g
Z O::Jzo::l
OUlm~z;:
It: 015 <(~
"&
i
z
~
.
~
Q S
~
~
~
"
~
~
~ ~
.,
.
3 g
"
, Exhibit B
~ PROPOSED DIVISION
Our request for the variance includes the following in reSDonse to requirements as listed on o. 1201
This special condition does not apply to other lands, structures or buildings in the same district. (Subd. 2, b., I-a:
This special condition 1> concerned with the shape of the property, (Subd. 2, b., I-a)
Although this special condition is of importance to us economically, that is not the orimarv factor, (Subd._2, I-b)
Summary in brief-
Included is the survey of the lot we want to develop, Included is a tentative lot line extending directly
from Cathcart Drive to the back of the property, that is, to the lot line of the Anderson property.
We would then be creating a lot that is a simple rectangle, consisting 01'30,000 sq, ft. instead of 40,000 sq. ft.
There would be no change in the density of the neighborhood. The lot would be a lovely one and the size
would be most attractive.
Exhibit C
APPLICANTS' REQUEST
CITY OF
SHOREWOOD
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD' SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927' (952) 474-3236
FAX (952) 474~0128. www.ci.shorewood.mn,us.cityha1!@ci.shorewQod.mn.u5
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Planning Commission, Mayor and City Council
FROM:
Brad Nielsen
DATE:
27 October 2005
RE:
Meldahl, AIm - Revised Minor Subdivision
FILE NO.
405(05.28)
BACKGROUND
In 1991 Aim Meldahl and her husband split their property at 6180 Cathcart Drive (see
Site Location map - Exhibit A, attached) into three lots (see Exhibit B). They
subsequently sold the westerly lot and later recombined the easterly two lots. Last
year they were successful in resubdividing the property as previously approved, You
may recall that earlier this year the Meldahls applied for a conditional use permit to
place fill on the westerly of the two lots. During the C.u.P. process and in the process
of marketing their property, they have concluded that a different lot configuration
would yield a better, more buildable lot. As a result the Meldahls have applied for a
new minor subdivision as illustrated on Exhibit B.
The property is located in the R-1A, Single-Family Residential zoning district and
contains 80,075 square feet of area. The existing easterly lot is occupied by the
Meldahls' home and a detached garage. In order to accomplish the new subdivision,
the Meldahls intend to relocate the detached garage so as to comply with side yard
setback requirements,
ANAL YSIS/RECOMMENDATlON
The primary reason for the resubdivision request is that the westerly ofthe two
existing lots experiences drainage issues, particularly on the south half of the lot. The
new configuration establishes a building site that would front on Cathcart Drive rather
than West 62nd Street. The result is a building pad location that has a higher elevation
n
" 't PAINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
e"
Exhibit A
STAFF REPORT - OCT. 05
APPLiCATION
Meldahl- vanance/minor division
Memorandum
Re: Meldahl Minor Subdivision
27 October 2005
than the CUlTent configuration. To build on the existing westerly lot would require
substantial site alteration beyond what has already been approved in the applicants'
recent conditional use permit. The likely building site achieved by the reconfiguration
results in an elevation similar to that upon which the existing home is located.
Obviously, the configuration is somewhat gerrymandered, with the southerly lot line
angling southward in order to comply the minimum 40,000 square-foot area
requirement. Ordinarily, gerrymandered lot lines are highly discouraged, however, in
this case there is a strong argument to be made for the improved building location and
reduced site alteration, It should be noted that the new lot line is shown at 20 feet
from the applicants' attached garage, where 10 feet is the minimum. lithe lot line
were moved southward 10 feet it could reduce the severity of the angled lot line,
It is recommended that the proposed minor division be approved subject to the
applicant providing new drainage and utility easements, 10 feet around each of the
newly configured lots. It is expected that the applicant will subsequently want to
request a vacation of the existing easements that were dedicated with the previous
subdivision. Approval of the division should be contingent upon the following:
1. The applicants were given a deadline of 30 October to complete the regrading of
their property in compliance with their C.u.P. As ofthis writing, the grading has
not occurred. In no way should the resolution approving the new division be
released until such time as the regrading has been completed,
2. The applicants must provide drainage and utility easements, 10 feet around each of
the new lots. The applicants' surveyor should provide legal descriptions for these
easements, and their attorney should prepare deeds in favor of the City.
3. The applicants must provide an up-to-date (within 30 days) title opinion or title
commitment for review by the City Attorney.
4, Consistent with the last approval of the minor division, the applicants must pay the
difference between the previously paid park dedication and local sanitary sewer
access charges and the current rate of those charges.
5, The items referenced in 1-3 above must be completed prior to this matter being
placed on the City Council's agenda for approval, but no later than 30 days from
the Planning Commission's recommendation,
6, Once the applicants receive a certified copy of the Council resolution approving
the request, they must record it within 30 days, or the approval will be void,
-2-
Memorandum
Re: Meldahl Minor Subdivision
27 October 2005
Since submitting their application, the applicants have submitted a drawing showing
another alternative for dividing their property (see Exhibit C), While this plan results
in a straight lot line, it falls short of the 40,000 square-foot Q1'ea requirement by
10,000 square feet. This plan would necessitate a variance application and a public
hearing. Prior to extensive discussion of the current application the Commission
should ask the applicants which plan she wants considered, If the new plan is their
preference, an application for a variance should be submitted, so that a legal notice
announcing a public hearing can be published,
Cc: Craig Dawson
Larry Brown
Tim Keane
Ann Meldahl
-3-
8jffiffi\ \m\ ~
~1
~
l-J
r-'~
~
---!:
-~
. ----1;
,.---ii
~
~l
.~
~ t!
~~J.
i--~
~zj
~,
m
.~
~,.."..." ~~ n...... J-I
~ ~I
,,- "
, ". :},
~l
!
f.
~!
i --_
\ I
>. <l
! '0 1:: ~
- ~ !- ~H
.Of0" ~ -- I: ~-a-i
. . \\ f-Ji ~
-II -t ~
... -ll oJ ... ~ ..J~ ~.;
\\ l ^~
· . . .\\\ IW-.,- . - ~ Jg
I'-- ~"".o' 7 · I to
. ,--- \ 'if c:
. ---- ,;,
~ / "...~ ::::::-, \ ',\ \' . ~, c:
~~ -" A?j t,ji~;I'~~~~i'::
~\--:::lfi ~ /~ ~\
r:::Ti~ --
l~~
.
.
-:
~ ClIM3lllMOO""'''
.
~~\-
~~~
I I "'\\ I Iy ~ z....c: g
I \\--1 " ~
UL' ~
Y\ \\ ~ 7 0
~I/
m) I
ID
gtf
0_
. .
I--
/~ \ II
~ttr~
l/'- __l
/ !
'\ !
------<. .'or '::..,
/l )\
- ~
-
~
'r-J .
. .
. .
-
\. II.
-
~
-
'",
'.
I--
~y
/f
C\l1ll3>>Cl1.LNIfljQ
..
_- L
5f -.~
· ~ .LZ--
'\",1;( ~
~I.~\".o.,
- \I "~!<2
I- f---
~ /.
.......... ;.;.( .......
.1--
~ :.J, \J . .
.., .oJ -I -t
"
-
Ii
I I "I
1-........._
1--1
..
/~
-
..-
-./
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
I
PROPOSED LOT DIVISION AND CERTIFiCATE OF SURVEY FOR
JOHN & ANN MELDAHL
It-- IN LOT 2, MINNEWASHTA ACRES
. I . / HEN~/EPIN COUNTY, MINN~SO:A '-,
~~~~~~ ;' I~~_____~:~:~~~:~~/ 2~---:~:~~-l::__!-
I I /I . . 1 1 I I I I
~..--.....AA;-.___.._.._........_........ '555. / i'i //..jl " I ": II
i- YI o. _.._--'t-,-- I / I I
j , . . I ;~'i' DRAINAGE AW'.,.JITllITY EASE)riENTS '::"~'r-! ! /
I I I I -j.....,
i<<ii...__.....\'\,~-------- I. I . ff I -, I I II
I ." 476.S9 ---1--.- -....t.--....---..- I I I I
I . . . . ..; / l~. ~.~R""OSEtl ~~~: FARcarll :
I I I C ",pO," 50, FT, I I I I
I I I I I Y I I
I / 01 I / II I I
I I ql I I /, I I
I , :;). I I I I I I
k:_.~wtSr UE Of LOT 2, I nl I T f I I I I
1 J.IlNNEWASX1'AACRES I "l-~;.se I I I
I ' I""'"' 1 Ai!l;1 I
I I f 'k.. f ff ~ .j ::;.: I
J it ,J, I l~. ~ ~ I
I ~ ::; I&" 1("1'/ I
I \ 'I f' I .. .~,/ I
I , II 1 ~. rll
\, I \ \ I I
\ \ I P OPOSED\ l"l':!V ' I I
\ \ I D VIDlNG--,-\~ \ I I I
\ \ I LI E ,""'" \ I I I
\ J i. \ ~ V \ I~a i
\.\ !~ ~ I l~ J
\ ;.. \ I , I 'I I I
\:'" 'I _/ \~, I
',.., ~ II
\ t 1'11" I , I
IN l-,
10 I I I I
I~ ~' I,
- , ' I I
I \ ~ ,I J I
I ..'1 ~ I I I
NOTt: RESTORE SW ALE _-~+,........ I 'j I I
TO PREViOUS GRADES - I I
,"OF05EO .....L....... I \ ,(8 i\ I i
SlLT FENCE/ I ~~.
I I \ I I ,...
I 10 ,,' , I '""'"
I ~ "" S,I 1',IAi!l;
I . I IW
\'_ llol~lli!ln-
-- \ I \
;;~o;rw~--'"
EXISTING
HOUSE
#lll~
/
I"
I
o
q
o
~
I ElLACKOP
I RO aWAY
,
~Tcr
,
,
I
I
I
I
I
,
I
..0 I
",I.
"I
'"
"',
,
,
,
~
>-
.~
p:::
~
E-<
p:::
<r:
u
::c1
E-<
<r:
U
~
WEST 62\ND ST.:'
1~EXlSTINC1'"
1 eM' ClLVERT
"""
CF'LOT2.
*
3.\a"
~-
EXtSilNG
HOUSE
12.6940
~.
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
J,
\l;
\
\
\
\
~
'\ t!P
PROPOSED JOUTH PARCEL
.. 40,07 I SQ. ft.
I
I
I
I
/
I
,
\
,.
-
tIl
, "
\
\
.
00:1.'.1
,~ V
"..
~
",4., ;:
~~ a
(5;) ~"f
~,~~
~<$ ~\><'\..J.,
~~~G"-,.cta~'\.
~~'0<'\. /
z
---------
EXISTING LEGAL DESCRiPTIONS
/
WEST PARCEL :
The East 121.16 feet of the West 476.69 feet of that port of Lot 2, "Minnewoshto Acres, Hennepin County, Minnesota" lying north of the South 17.00 feet there;
EAST PARCEL:
Thot port of Lot 2, "Minnewoshto Acres, Hennepin County, Minnesota", lying east of the West 476.69 feet thereof and north of the South 17,00 feet thereof.
PROPOSED LEGAL OESCRlPTIONS :
NORTH PARCEL :
That port of Lot 2, "Minnewashta Acres,' Hennepin County, Minnesota", lying east of the West 355.53 feet of said Lot 2. and nortl1erly following described
11ne: Beginning at 0 point in the easterly line of sold Lot 2, distant 120.00 feet southerly, os measured along soid eosterly line, from the Northeast corner
of said Lot 2; thence on an assurned bearing of North 89 degrees 54 minutes 48 seconds West, oiong 0 line drown porollel with the northerly line of soid Lot 2,
a distance of 100,00 feet; thence South 45 degrees 37 minutes 48 seconds West to the Ecst line of soid west 355.53 feet, and said line there ending,
SOUTH PARCEL :
That port of Lot 2, "Minnewoshto.Acres, H~nneP1n Count:y,.Minnesato",.lyi~g eost of the ~est 355:53 feet of.soid Lot 2, north of the South 17.00 feet of scrci
Lot 2, ond southerly of the follOWing descnbed line: 8eglnnlng at 0 pOInt In the" easterly line of soid Lot 2. distant 120.00 feet southerly, as meosured along
soid eosterly line, from the. Northeo~t corner of soid Lot 2; thence on on assumed beoring of North 89 degrees 54 minutes 48 seconds West, clong 0 line dr:Jw:',
porollel with the northerly line of SOld Lot 2. 0 distance of 100.00 feet; thence South 45 degrees 37 minutes 48 secor;ds West to the East line of said west
355.53 feet, ond said line, there ending. '
o denotes Iron marker
(90S.3): denotes existing spot elevation, mean sea level datum
__ 917--': denotes existing contour line, mean sea level datum
~: denotes proposed contour line, mean sec level datum
~ : denotes droll,oge diredion
Bearings shown ore based upon on assumed datum.
This survey shows the boundaries of the above described property, the location .,f three existing bUildings, end
location of 0 proposed dividing line thereon. It does net purpod to show ony other Improvements or encroacnm
!.
ii
Exhibit B
PROPOSED DIVISION
OESIGNE REVlSIO DATE
;_JJ'-I1.;
O!':5CRll'noH
......... GRONSERG AND
r I' ASSOCIATES, INC
~<'\,,4,. ~
O<J :v-<<;-O
G.;>
9,1: ~
~%-s.~<'\,,4,.
~4;~G\.O~~p-<<;- /
-<<;-<<J <J"'-
'?o-
PROPOSED LOT DIVISION AND CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR
JOHN & ANN MELDAHL
IN LOT 2, MINNEWASHTA ACRES ~
HENNEPIN COUNTY. MINNESOT A ~
/ I I \.
/ / I "-
p; - , ("""''''''''---'''' J55.53 .....-1...... ,;.=:.'."-~,,," ......../.:....U ": I / ft;'[,~ ,
I I .I..:'.DR'.'''' ,::i!'&urr EA~-'.'1::.1 . ;I ...J.
r" m...it.... m.............. .".. .....t..1~r~......~..~k~~H~ ?;o,Oj/J If
1 1 01 I I r I I I
I 1 0 ~ /1 1 I
I j ;;j I PROPO D / I II /
1"...~'..~,lr m,.' '7 I Dl~~,\, / ..l... .
I I \ ~'jl~+iii.1 W"",
~ f 1''''2''''"1' rril
i IE 'I' %' <l!i> ~ I
f ~ \.. III
\ I I \~ III
\ , \ ,Will
\ \ ' \ II 1
\ \ I \ II I
\ ~ lL< I \ 113' I
~\~\ *) \ III
\...\ - I~ II
\;;; Ill< I I I
10 ..b I I I
I" , !:l.~1 I I
NOre REST"': SW,LE......jC... ~ 1 I
TO PREVIOUS GRADES ~ I I
""""ED ..tl..... ,. .J. \ I I
SU FENCE ::;.'J' t.J.
/ 1 1\!If:;"
/ .1111*
'- 1"lkl-
-- I \
S 89054' 48"
-
-
o
o
g
,!
--
~
/
1
I
I
1
~
\
~*
'""\
\
PROPOSED~ ?ARCD..
.. SOP7S) SQ, fT.
/
/
1
I
l.:. .~
~
"
)'
...
-;:-~()...--w-"'!B-
-----
-- ,
';;:
WEST 62\ND ST.~
,--"""", ".
1 -C!oP(:U.\l'ERf
9
/
..../
.
EXISTING LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS :
/
/"
fa '"
IRa Io.Y
~rr
I
I
I
1
I
1'l1
~I
"'I
\
I
~
:>
,......,
0:::
~
E-<
0:::
<I:i
U
::r::
E-<
<I:i
u
"
\
..::.
~
WEST PARCEL :
The Ecst 12'.16 feel of the West 476.69 feet of that port of Lot 2. "Mionewoshto Acres, Hennepin County, MiMesoto" lying north of the South 17.00 feet thereof.
EAST PARCEL :
That part of Lot 2. "Minnewoshta Acres, Hennepin County, M~nnesoto", lying eost of the West 475.69 feet thereof and north of the South 17.00 feel thereof.
PROPOSED LEGAL DESCRlf'TIONS :
NORTH P AReEL :
That port of Lot 2, "Minnewoshto Acres, Hennepin County. Minnesota", lying east of the West 355.53 feet of said Lot 2. end nartherlr of 0 line drawn from 0 point
on the East line of soid Lot 2 distant 120.00 feet southerly from the Northeast corner of said Lot 2, to 0 point on the East Rne 0 said West 355.53 feet distant
127.45 feet southerly from the intersection of sold East line 01 the West 355.53 feet with the North Bne of sold Lot 2.
SOUTH PARca :
That port of Lot 2, "Minnewashto Acres, Hennepin County, Minnesota", l(ing east of the West 355.53 feet of said Lot 2. north of the South 17.00 feet of 5:.lid Lot 2,
and southerly of a line drown from 0 point on the East line of sold Lo 2 distant 120.00 feet southerly from the Northeast corner of said Lot 2, to 0 point on the
,,,' 1m, (:~~7 ;;;'5~;;t~;;~~:to~::,:~~ ~::: ',::h,::: f~::~' ;o,,,,,,ti,o 0' ,,;d '"t ""' of ~. W"t 35553 ,..t w;th tho Noclh no< '+f S(Jid Lot 2.
_ .911- _: denotes e:dsting contour line. mean sea level dotum
~: denotes proposed c:antOlJl" line, mean sea level datum
~ ; denotes dr(llnage direction
Bearings shOW1l are based upon on assumed datum.
This -survey shows the ba~90rie.s of the above described property. the location of ~hree existing bu~dings, ond the proposed
location of 0 proposed div!dlng hne thereon. It does not purport to show any other Improyements or enl;;:rool;;:hments.
~4'.I.:roiH>,Tt.5CJ
~
M'"
-
$GRONBERI3 AND
- ASSOCIATES. INC
CONSl.,ILTING ENGINEERS,
LAND SURVEYORS.
AND SITE PLANNC:RS
445NORTHVlW..OWOR. LONGLAKE.MN.5S3S6
1152-C3-4141
Ihlll'8l:lyc:erlilylhll\lhll:plen,apeQk:alI<>n,DrtepOll.-
pnlllllfadbymll,Dl'und~my~~.Bl'IdlhBl
I BlI'!lIduly'<anS<<lpniaulonal8l'l\llflller8Odll11l(\
lII,I/Vll)'Dl'underllle_oIlheSllllloollo!lnnaQ1lI
~
'"'0030'
M'"
2-28-05
'll-'~
_lWDNl1.H:~
-
EOO
~
IISO
,lOIlNO.
n"--l'l"'"
Exhibit C
ALTERNATIVE DIVISION
ReqUlres a vanance
Os-G74-
CITY OF
SHOREWOOD
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD' SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927' (952) 474-3236
FAX (952) 474-0128. www.cLshorewood.mn.us. cityhall@cLshorewood,mn.us
Celebrating 50 Years' 1956 - 2006
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City Council
Craig W, Dawson, City Administrator ;ll\
April 6, 2006 UU
2006-2025 Capital Equipment Plan, Excelsior Fire District
The Excelsior Fire District Board has passed its proposed 2006-2025 Capital Equipment Plan for
consideration by the councils of the five member cities, According to the j oint powers agreement,
any amendment (which is what an update is) to the CIP requires approval by at least two-thirds of the
member cities by April 15, This timing was established so that budget planning for the following
year would reflect the approved CEP.
Shorewood is the fourth city council to consider the proposed CEP. The Deephaven city council
approved the proposed CEP on April 3, and the Greenwood city council approved it on April 4. The
Excelsior city council will consider the proposed CEP on April 10, The Tonka Bay city council will
consider it on April 11.
Attached are a narrative memorandum from the Interim Fire Chief and the proposed CEP. Notable in
the proposed CEP are:
. The contributions to the Capital Equipment Fund have been revised to maintain a goal oflevel
funding from year-to-year. Compared to the current CEP, the amount for 2007 would be
increased from $125,000 to $150,000; from $150,000 to $155,000 in 2008; and from
$150,000 to $160,000 through the balance of the CEP,
. Estimates for three pieces of equipment (Engine 22, acquired in 2006; Engine 21, acquired in
2008; and Heavy Rescue, acquired in 2010) have been increased collectively $125,000,
. The replacement ofthe Fire Chiefs auto is postponed one year (from 2007 to 2008).
. The Capital Equipment Fund was tapped for the purchase of several items in 2003 and 2004
that had not been shown in the approved CEP at the time (see footnotes on the CEP), The
Board has stated its policy that it will no longer use this practice; such matters will require a
formal revision of the CEP and gain the requisite approval by the city councils.
. The policy of paying cash for items costing $50,000 or less remains in place.
. Capital maintenance for the fire stations remains anticipated, and is unchanged in the
proposed CEP.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recl)mmends that the Cl)unci! apprl)ve the 2006-2025 Capital Impmvement Program of
the Excelsil)r Fire District.
n
f t PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
...
#-9A
CAPITAL EQUIPMENT PLAN EVALUATION
MARCH 2006
As a companil)n tl) the 2007 Capital Equipment Plan, this evaluatil)n is intended to
explain thl)se changes that have I)ccurred in the 2006 Capital Equipment Plan since
it was apprl)ved last year. These changes result in a recl)mmended increase in the
size I)fthe annual cl)ntributions.
1) 2004 cities cl)ntributil)n reduced frl)m 95,000.00 tl) $50,000.00, in part
because 2003 unbudgeted expenses totaling $48,148 were inadvertently not
shl)wn I)n the 2004 CEP.
2) 2004 upgrade radiI) system $7,500.00 in plan $20,655.00 actual aml)unt nsed.
3) 2004 miscellanel)us equipment $5,383.00 not in plan. (defibulatl)r)
4) 2004 capital truck maintenance $6,660.00 not in plan. (?)
5) 2005 cities cl)ntributil)n reduced frl)m 95,000.00 tl) $75,000.00
6) 2005 upgrade radiI) system $7,500.00 in plan $22,772.00 actual aml)unt used.
7) 2005 miscellanel)us equipment $16,150.00 not in plan. (2 thermo imaging
cameras)
8) 2005 bl)at $428.00 not in plan. (bl)at seats)
9) 2005 utility 21 purchase $43,091.00 was nl)t figured intI) the CEP.
The Cities cl)ntributil)ns were reduced from pril)r levels by $65,000.00 I)ver two
years. $100,139.00 was spent on items that were nl)t budgeted intI) the CEP over
twl) years fl)r a net reductil)n tl) the CEP I)f $165,139.00.
The District is due tl) purchase a new Engine 22 this year with the first payment due
in 2007. The current CEP will be short by $25,955.00 in 2007 and new Engine 22
will have tl) be but on hl)ld. Alsl) $310,000.00 will nl)t be enl)ugh to purchase new
engine and equipment. An inflation rate of3% was used to calculate future
purchases. Manufacturers tell me they have nl)t had less than a 4% increase in the
past 5 years.
With the cost of steel and new mandates I)n diesel engines we can expect closer tl)
8% increases over the next cl)uple I)fyears. Alsl) the Cl)st fl)r the replacement of
Engine 21 in 2009 and the replacement I)f Heavy Rescue in 2011 shl)uld be
increased.
I wl)uld recl)mmend the fl)llowing adjustments to the CEP tl) maintain an adequate
replacement schedule.
1) Increase the Cl)st I)f Engine 22 frl)m $310,000.00 to $325,000.00.
2) Increase the Cl)st tl) replace Engine 21 frl)m $300,000.00 to $350,000.00
3) Increase the Cl)st to replace Heavy Rescue frl)m $250,000.00 to $300,000.00
4) Cities cl)ntributil)n in 2007 wl)uld increase from $125,000.00 tl) $165,000.00
5) Cities cl)ntributil)n in years 2008 thru 2016 would go from $150,000.00 tl)
$155.000.00
6) Cities cl)ntributil)n in years 2017 thru 2021 wl)uld go frl)m $150,000.00 tl)
$160,000.00
With these prl)pl)sed adjustments, the cities contributions wl)uld be an additil)nal
$135.000.00 I)ver 15 years. This wl)uld replace the most of the $165.000.00 that was
reduced fmm the CEP in 2004 & 2005.
The board should alsl) cl)nsider the fact that if miscellaneous equipment and capital
truck maintenance dl)llars are gl)ing to be spent I)ut I)fthe CEP, funds shl)uld be
built intI) the plan for these items I)r budgeted intI) the Operating Budget. The CEP
was not intended tl) prl)vide surplus funds tl) Cl)ver Operating Budget short falls. If
money fmm the CEP is used tl) I)ffset other budget shl)rt falls, the funds shl)uld be
replaced.
Excelsior Fire District
2005.2025
Capllal Equlpmltnt Plan
Original cite Aqulred ,/ ;> 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Equipment Item Bench 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
Cost m..'
Beginning Balance 322,693 259,493 166,571 54,167 21,045 78,966 48,545 74,516 1,507 31,537 32,167 32,811 133,467 116,136 156,459 124,588 66,080 33,402 44,070 54,951 136,050 153,771
Air Pack Replaceme 103,000 16yrs 2000 180,000
2000 Extraction Tool 30,000 18yrs 1996 50,000
Upgrade Radio System 2003 8,825 20,855 22,772 7,500 7,500 7,500
Engine 11 327,000 20yrs 2002 72,553 72,553 72,553 72,553 72,553 80,000 80,000 80,000
Chief Auto 15,000 6yrs 2001 25,000 30,000 36,000 42,000
Fire Marshall Auto 22,000 8yrs 2001 32,000 40,000 48,000
Duty Officer 32,500 8yrs 2003 39,500 45,000
Utillty11.Excursion 37,500 15yrs 2002 42,000
Utility 12.P/UTruck 37,500 15yrs 2002 40,000
Tanker 181,000 25yrs 2002 39,153 39,153 39,153 39,153 39,153
Heavy Rescue 116,520 20yrs 1996 60,000 60,000 60,000 80,000 80,000
Engine 22 120,000 20yrs 1936 65,000 65,000 65,000 55,000 55,000
Aerial 11 421,000 20yrs 1998 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000
UtiHty21 40,000 15yrs 200S 1,000 43,091 44,000
Engine 21 300,000 20yrs 2009 70,000 70,000 70,000 70,000 70,000
HazmatTrailor 3,687
Boot 17,132 428
Miscellaneous Equip. 13,512
Capital Truck Maint Ongoing 10817 6660
Building Fund 2004 25,000 50,000 35,000 85,000
Total Expenses 155,678 145,404 194,147 119,206 184,206 97,500 192,000 135,000 234,500 130,000 160,000 160,000 60,000 180,000 122,000 195,000 221,000 194,000 150,000 150,000 80,000 145,000 170,000
Revenues
Interest Income 2,467 145 948 1,083 421 1,579 971 1,490 30 631 643 856 2,669 2,323 3,129 2,492 1,322 666 881 1,099 2,721 3,075
Sale of Used Equipment 2337
Donations 5011
Cities Contribution 95000 50000 75000 125000 150000 155000 160000 160000 160000 160000 160000 160000 160000 160000 160000 160000 160000 160000 160000 160000 160000 160000 180000
Total Revenues 102478 52482 75000 125948 151083 155421 161579 160971 161490 160030 160831 160643 160858 162669 182323 163129 162492 181322 160668 180881 161099 182721 183075
Year End Balance 259 493 188571 47,424 54,167 21,045 78968 48,545 74,516 1,507 31537 32,167 32811 133,467 118,136 158,459 124,588 88,080 33 402 44,070 54,951 136,050 153,771 146,847
Noles:
1. Inleresl Income esllmaled at 2.0% 10 FY202S.
3, Radio lJ!ldale to BOO MHZ mandated by Henn.County
2. Equlpmenl lnflalionApproKimately 3% per year
ii~!li'rE:!r!ff__:"!JJ'.0i
4,O$IIbrtlalor,fllrlilJJills
if;):f;jj;C~:Mll~jf'>"rr;';'W~~3li{i'F!!(
CITY OF
SHOREWOOD
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD. SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927' (952) 474-3236
FAX (952) 474-0128 . www.ci.shorewood.mn.us . cityhall@ci.shorewood.mn.us
Celebrating 50 Years' 1956 - 2006
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Mayor and City Conncil
Craig Dawson, City Administrator
Steve Gurney, Acting City Enginee~r.d"
April 10, 2006
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
Approve Plans, Specifications and Estimate and Authorize Advertisement of Bids
Southeast Area Well / Amesbury Area Well Interconnection Project
Attachment 1 is excerpts ofthe plans, specifications, and engineers estimate for the Southeast Area
Well / Amesbury Area Well Interconnection Project.
This project is being initiated by the city for a number of reasons, The existing Amesbury system
consists of a hydropnuematic system that has become obsolete. The current Plumbing Code allows a
maximum of 25 connections to this type of system, There are 137 connections on the Amesbury
system. In addition, the controls for this system are no longer commercially available. This project
will allow the city to remove the hydropnuematic tank at the Amesbury well house,
An interconnection with the Southeast Area system will provide a more reliable system. The elevated
water tower, located south of Highway 7, provides greater storage capacity in the event of a fire or
power outage. The current Amesbury system has limited storage, and relies on electricity to operate
consistently,
Finally, better water quality will be provided to users since the interconnection will allow the city to
blend water between the two systems in the event that one well would be producing water that does not
meet the standards for drinking water.
Since this is a City-initiated project, the abutting properties will not be assessed for the improvements,
The construction of the watermain will include providing individual service connection stub-outs to the
edge of the property. Property owners will be charged a $10,000 connection fee if they choose to hook
up to the new water service connection point. This connection is voluntarily.
A Public Information Meeting was held on February 23, 2006. There were seven residents that
attended the meeting, Comments received include concerns about construction in general, and one
offer to allow contractor staging on the frontage of their property.
n
t: .. PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
...
&/ A
Approve Plans, Specifications and Estimate and Authorize Advertisement of Bids
Southeast Area Well / Amesbury Area Well Interconnection Project
Aprill0, 2006, City Council Meeting
Page 2
The mailing announcing the Public Information Meeting also included a survey to determine if the
properties along the construction route were interested in connecting to city water. There were two
notable responses that resulted in a change to the construction limits of the project.
Three of the four houses located on the private cul-de-sac off of St. Albans Bay Road, south of Manor
Road, expressed interest in connecting to city water. In order to serve these properties, an 8-inch
lateral was extended to the end of the cul-de-sac, serving 5252, 5260, and 5262 St. Albans Bay Road,
Two of four houses at the north end of the project, on Suburban road near the new Parkview Crossing
development, expressed interest, so the 12-inch main was extended to serve 4990 and 5020 Suburban
Road.
Costs associated with the design, watermain construction, and inspection services are to be funded by
various city funds as summarized below, This includes installation of storm sewer at Manor Park and
restoration of the roadway to its existing condition after the excavation is completed,
Estimated costs to be funded by the Water Operations Fund are outlined in Table 1:
Description Aml)unt
Watermain Piping, Valves, Hydrants $458,267.50
Trench Restoration $73,920,00
25% of Estimated Costs for Engineering,
Administrative, and Legal Fees $133,046.88
Total Aml)unt tl) Be Fnnded by Water
Operatil)ns Fund $665,234.38
Table 1
Storm sewer improvements, consisting primarily of replacement of the outlet pipe for the pond at
Manor Park, will be done while the road surface is disturbed. The costs for this work will be funded
by the City Stormwater Management Utility Fund, as shown in Table 2,
Descriptil)n Amount
Storm Sewer Improvements $23,957.00
25% of Estimated Costs for Engineering,
Administrative, and Legal Fees $5,989.25
Tl)tal Aml)unt tl) Be Funded by Stl)rmwater
Mana~ement Utility Fund $29,946.25
Table 2
Surface improvements, including a bituminous overlay, will be done once all work has been
completed. The costs for this work will be funded by the City Local Roadway Fund, as shown in
Table 3,
Approve Plans, Specifications and Estimate and Authorize Advertisement of Bids
Southeast Area Well / Amesbury Area Well Interconnection Project
April 10, 2006, City Council Meeting
Page 3
Description Aml)unt
Surface Improvements $114,060,00
Bituminous Milling and Overlay $130,980,00
25% of Estimated Costs for Engineering,
Administrative, and Legal Fees $61,260.00
Tl)tal Aml)unt tl) Be Fnnded by the City
Ll)cal Rl)adway Fund $306,300.00
Table 3
Recl)mmendation
Staff is recommending approval of resolution that approves the plans, specifications, and engineer's
estimate and authorizes advertisement of bids. A resolution is included for your consideration,
w
>-
~~~ w
w
~ I
,'0 W
:>wt;i -0 ~I
I iij ~ B 0 g
<J) 11 0
z d ;;: 0 >-
0 ~ii 0" " " ~ 0
~ " 0 ~'O ,. '\ "
, ""'", ;j ~!;i 0 ~I
U~t! "
0 j:~ ~~ ~~ " '! .s::: < u .
u: 0, ~ II ~~ (j) 0
~g ~~ sg f "
13 di H ~ 0
~~ ~~ 0 0 - 1 ~ ci
OJ " , II 0 z
"- ~~ :~~ ~! i; ~ " i c~ u >-
<J) " ~ w
co ~2 ~2l.i ," Gl ^ " w
z ~~~ ~~ ~.3 , ^ I
Z "0 1 CQlf Ii II w
;06 ~8 1<0 0
CO X ..~ !
OJ 'D~ ig~ 85 e, OJ
6 ",; \1'0, ~i 0 g
00 ]
g !i;~ ,. ~: ~ I
co ~8
g~ " 0 ]
'O~ U I - , ,
:,~ S2 l!~ , ,
, .
'><" ~
"~'U,~_..__~__ --_._~
v;
>-
Z
w
:>
w
..Cl >
0
..Cl er
W "- w
"" " '"
er
>- C)
>-< ~ z
E- '" z
p;:: U 0 z '"
w CD
:::0 w >- er
0 Q :0
I:J:I >-0 co CD ,n
[f} 0 ~ "- :0 0
W p;:: "- v; ,
'" v;
:;;: p.., ~ 0 0 0
<t z z
~ '" '" 0
"",---Z '" 0 z
..Cl 0 ~ 0 z <{
0 >-
..Cl ~ f-< c= 0 0
W E- = 0 Q W
"" U 00: :0 er (3
W 0 rJl er 0 cr
>- z a.
'" "'
<t Z ~ z <{
W Z 0 '" i':
p;:: 0 0 0 0 U
<t U z <{
>- <i' 0
p;:: '" er
E- W Eo-< er >-
[f} E- <{
.... w OJ
<t Z U "
w ~ " v;
z
::r: <{
E- er OJ
0 -,
:::0 " <{
0 z c'
[f} '.\ v;
a.
z
0 z
c= 0
0
:0 0
cr w
,- >-
v; <{
z 0
0 0
0 ~
111"'1) 'II 'ljfl'tlll'l ;I"'I~II ~r: iii '1It,1I
ill!!:il!i Ij: fit'J ! i:I:i m .J.ls!?:5if 11m,
. ~ .@@@I@
11 I! I j I1111
~ 1.!11 iiB~
o
w
I
,.
v;
v;
~
o
W
I
>-
v;
z
'"
~
>-
~ ~
J~~~
~~_\i
,
!H~
s ~~~~
~ iil~'''D
,
t 1[15
~ ~
d hO!
s ~ ~ ~~
~ '" tll;
j;'~~~ ~~~
UiG RU
~ ~
~ ::1
:l,:i
nu~
~~
a,
~~
~ c ~ ~
d~h~~ ~
~~~~~;?~ g
w
'I
w
'"
o
z
>-
o
OJ
,
o
CO
"-
88 r:
L ~~ <3
W.'
>- o'
~ !~g
(f) \2\?~
w ;~~
"
b. ~~~
zlq~
zlf:,~~
o II"O
i= g;,,:>o
<t ..,,,,~
;;: g~
~ ;is
w u"
..
DO
wc"
Ow <
z""
-z-",
Z~IT:W
~~2~
~~&~
~~g~2
~(f)u?~
~;::;'i!ff'i!
rr<e!'-tL>-
Dt:: Ow
widwz;?
:::PiiiQ~
2'lU:::>';;:O
>--'u
6~~S6
z(Lj~~
3:LL~<tO
DO "
I "W
",zo"->-
z:?wt;'i
:?()~~~
~Sa:~
e~~~Z
~<(w~ii5
Will"J
W{L >-::;:
2'i'::8~:>
1lI
111
lil'I'I'
~ ~ :: :
u
u
"
ir. '"
~ "5
~
--"- '~~::... "::,:",.,,,.
""_'_~""'"'o
'"~""" "'.,,,,, ":."",
OJ"'.'" ~
~~.~
,-, '""an. ,,';~%O'1>o "'~
V.LOS3NNIW'00
1.~3r;~ Al.l~ 3Hl.~~3'dOHS
113M A'l:ln8S3~:~~~~3NNO~'l:l31.NI
M 'lf3'l:l'lf l.S'lf3Hl.nOS
~.:'~'"~~~..:.=::..~;~
".,,;:;t.-. '""''''-''Y~
"""~:;:C:,""""' 8SM
,,_ 'I"
'~'\ .1
-l4ty ~~ I
0,~ I
b:; ,
S
~
/f:
]70&10
),itS '-
SNitS:;;;--
_____lS
~
~
~
8
o
,
~
~
~
8C\
" Q
~
o
~
8
r
o
~
~
~
~
~
W
Z
W
"
o
o
~
o
"
z
~
~
~
"
"
o
,
i
%
,
~
j
,
!
~
ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS
SOUTHEAST AREA WELLlAMESBURY WELL
INTERCONNECTION PROJECT AND
APPURTENANT IMPROVEMENTS
CITY PROJECT NO. 05-05
FOR THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that sealed bids wiil be received by the City of Shorewood at the office of the
City Clerk until 10:00 a.m., Wednesday, May 17, 2006, at the Shorewood City Hail, 5755 Country Club
Road, Shorewood, MN 55331, and wiil be publicly opened and read at said time and place by
representatives of the City of Shorewood. Said proposals for the furnishing of ail labor and materials for
the construction, complete in-place, of the following approximate major quantities:
4,600 LF
400 LF
4,720 LF
9,380 SY
24' Roadway Overlay
8" DIP Water Main
12" DIP Water Main
Miiling Bituminous Pavement
The bids must be submitted on the Proposal Forms provided in accordance with the Contract Documents,
Plans, and Specifications dated April 10, 2006, as prepared by WSB & Associates. Inc., 701 Xenia
Avenue South, Suite 300, Minneapolis, MN 55416, which are on file with the City Clerk of Shorewood and
may be seen at the office of the Consulting Engineers or at the office of the City Clerk.
Copies of Proposal Forms and the Plans and Specifications for use by contractors submitting a bid may be
obtained from the Consulting Engineers, WSB & Associates, Inc., 701 Xenia Avenue South, Suite 300,
Minneapolis, MN 55416, upon deposit ofTwenty-five Doilars ($25.00) (non-refundable) per set.
No bids will be considered unless sealed and filed with the City Clerk of Shorewood and accompanied by
a cash deposit, cashier's check, or certified check, or bid bond made payable to the City of Shorewood for
five percent (5%) of the amount bid. to be forfeited as liquidated damages in the event that the bid be
accepted and the bidder fail to enter promptly into a written contract and furnish the required bond,
No bids may be withdrawn for a period of sixty (60) days from the date of opening of bids. The City of
Shorewood reserves the right to reject any or ail bids.
DATED: April 10, 2006
BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL
sls Craiq Dawson
City Administrator/City Clerk
Shorewood, MN
PUBLISHED IN THE:
Sun Sailor:
Construction Bulletin:
April 20, 2006
April 21 and April 28, 2006
SOUTHEAST AREA WELLIAMESBURY WELL
INTERCONNECTION PROJECT
AND APPURTENANT IMPROVEMENTS
CITY OF SHOREWOOO PROJECT NO, 05-05
WSB PROJECT NO. 1608-04
AFB
Bidder:
Address: Telenhone No:
Citv, State, Zip: Fax No:
ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE
SOUTHEAST AREA WELLlAMESBURY WELL INTERCONNECTION PROJECT
CITY PROJECT NO. 05-05
PROJECT NO. 01608-04
SHOREWOOD, MN
17-May-06
Opening Time: ]0:00 AM
Opening Date: May 17, 2006
City of Shorewood
5755 Country Club Road
Shorcwood, MN 55331
Dear Council Members:
]. The following proposal is made for furnishing and installing all labor and materials necessary for the
Southeast Area Well/AmcsbUlY Well Interconnection Project and AppUlienant work, City Project No. 05-05, for
the City of Shore wood, Minnesota.
2. The undersigned celtifies that the Contract Documents listed in the Instructions to Bidders have been
carefully examined, and that the site ofthe work has been personally inspected. The undersigned declares that
the amount and nature of the work to be done is understood, and that at no time will misunderstanding of the
Contract Documents be pleaded. On the basis of the Contract Documents, the undersigned proposes to fillTJish
all necessary apparatus and other means of construction, to do all the work and fumish all the materials in the
manner specified, and to accept as full compensation therefore the sum of the various products obtained by
multiplying each unit price herein bid for the work or materials, by quantities thereof actually incorporated in the
completed project, as determined by the Engineer. The undersigned understands that the quantities mentioned
herein are approximate only, and are subject to increase or decrease, and herehy proposes to perfonn all work as
either increased or decreased, in accordance with the provisions of the specification, at the unit prices bid in the
following proposal schedule, unless such schedule designates lump sum bids.
3. PROPOSED SCHEDULE: The Bidder agrees to perform all work described in the specifications and shown
on the plans tor the following unit prices:
Pagelof4
K:\0160B-04\Adm;nISpec\160B-04ProposaIForm.xls
SOUTHEAST AREA WELLlAMESB\JRY WELL INTERCONNECfION PROJECf
CITY PROJECT NO. 05-0S
PROJECTNO,01608.04
No. Mat. No. Item Units Qty Unit Price Total Price Unit Price Total Price
Schedule A-Surface Improvements
2021.501 MOBILlZAT]ON LUMP SUM , $32,000.00 $32,000.00
2 2101.502 CLEARiNG TREE 10 $300.00 $3,000.00
2101.507 GRUBBING TREE 10 ------. --,-,-~ $200.00 $2,000.00
4 2104.505 REMOYE BITUMINOUS PA YEMENT SQYD 440 $6,00 $2,640.00
2104.513 SAWING BITUMJNOUS P A YEMENT (FULL UN FT 390 $5.00 $],950,00
DEPTH)
6 2104.523 SALY AGE & REINSTALL SIGN EACH -~"'--,-,- $140.00 $140.00
2105.522 SELECT GRANULAR BORROW (CV) CUYD 500 $13,50 $6,750.00
2211.501 AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 (100% CRUSHED TON 2300 $15.00 $34,500.00
LIMESTONE)
2232.501 MILL BITUMINOUS SURFACE SQYD 9380 ~--,,- , -"'~,,-,,~ $5.00 $46,900.00
10 2350.501 TYPE LV 4 WEARiNG COURSE MIXTURE (B) TON 1630 ---~,,_. $50.00 $81,500,00
II 2350.502 TYPE LV 3 NON WEARING COURSE MIXTURE TON 1540 $48.00 $73,920,00
(B)
12 2357.502 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GALLON 1290 $ .. .m_.~ $2.00 $2,580.00
13 2563.601 TRAFFIC CONTROL LUMP SUM $7,500.00 $7,500,00
14 2573.502 S[LT FENCE, TYPE HEAVY DUTY (ORANGE) LINFT 1700 , $3.00 $5,100,00
15 2575.505 SODDING, TYPE LAWN (INCI... TOPSOIL & SQYD 4620 $ $4.00 $18,480.00
FERT.)
Tota[ Shedu[e A - Surface Improvements $318,960.00
Pagc2of4
K:\0160B-04\AdminISpec\1608.04ProposaIForm.xls
SOUTHEAST AREA WELUAMESBURY WELL INTERCONNECTION PROJECT
CITY PROJECT NO. 05.05
PROJECT NO. 01608.04
No. Mat. No. Item Units Qty Unit Price Total Price Unit Price Total Price
Schedule B - Water Main Improvements
16 2504.602 HYDRANT EACH 13 -~- $2,750.00 $35,750.00
17 2504.602 I" CORPORATION STOP EACH 47 ---- $75.00 $3,525,00
18 2504.602 6" GATE VALVE AND BOX EACH 13 $1,200.00 $]5,600,00
19 2504.602 8" GATE VALVE AND BOX EACH , $1,500.00 $4,500.00
20 2504.602 12" GATE VALVE AND BOX EACH 12 $1,500.00 $18,000.00
21 2504.602 I" CURB STOP & BOX EACH 47 5 $150.00 $7,050.00
22 2504.602 CONNECT TO EXISTTNG WATERMAIN (8") EACH $],000.00 $2,000.00
23 2504.602 CONNECT TO EXlSTiNG WATERMAIN (12") EACH , $2,000.00 $2,000.00
24 2504.603 I" TYPE K COPPER PIPE UNFT 1510 , $24.00 $36,240.00
25 2504.603 6" WATER MA]N-DUCT ]RON CL 52 UN FT 130 ---_."--~-~,,-,,-- $36.00 $4,680.00
26 2504.603 'WATER MAIN-DUCT IRON CL52 UN FT 400 $40.00 $]6,000.00
27 2504.603 12" WATER MAJN-DUCTILE JRON CLASS 50 UN FT 472] $60.00 $283,260.00
28 2504,608 DUCTILE ]RON F]TT]NGS POUND 8475 $3.50 $29,662.50
Tota] Shedule B - Water Main Improvements $458,267.50
Schedule C - Storm Sewer Improvements
29 2104.501 REMOVE PIPE CULVERTS UN FT 41 ---.---- - ---- $5.00 $205.00
30 2104,501 REMOVE PIPE DRAIN L1NFT 180 $3.00 $540.00
31 2501.567 12" RC SAFETY APRON & GRATE DESIGN EACH -~..~-~- -- ._--_....~ $800,00 $3,200,00
3022
32 2503,511 12" RC PIPE SEWER CLASS V UN FT 231 $42.00 $9,702.00
33 2506.502 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN EACH -- _._-~~- $1,250.00 $1,250,00
H
34 2506.601 CONTROL STUCTURESPEOAL 2 LUMP SUM , ~~ $8,000.00 $8,000.00
35 2511.501 RANDOM RlP RAP CLASS Jll CUYD 10 $]00.00 $],000.00
36 251L515 GEOTEXTILE FILTER F AERIC TYPE IV SQYD 15 $ ~~-_..._- $4,00 $60.00
Total Shedu]e C - Storm Sewer Improvements $23,957.00
GRAND TOTAL BID (SCHEDULES A+B+C)
$801,184.50
Page3of4
K:\0160a.04\Admin\Spcc\160B-04ProposaIForm.xls
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND ESTIMATES
AND AUTHORIZING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS
CITY PROJECT 05-05
SOUTHEAST AREA WELL / AMESBURY AREA WELL INTERCONNECTION
PROJECT
WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution 05-086 adopted by the City Council
September 12, 2005, Plans, Specifications and Estimates for the design phase of City
Project 05-05 were prepared,
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Shorewood, Minnesota:
1. Plans, Specifications and Estimates were prepared by WSB & Associates,
Inc" engineer for such improvement pursuant to Council Resolution 05-
086, Said plans, specifications and estimates are hereby approved and shall
be filed with the City Clerk.
2, The City Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official paper
and in Construction Bulletin an advertisement for bids, attached hereto as
Exhibit A, upon the making of such improvement under such approved
plans and specifications. The advertisement shall be published for 2
weeks, shall specify the work to be done, shall state that bids will be
opened and considered by the Council at 10:00 a,m, on May 17, 2006, in
the City Hall Council Chambers, and that no bids will be considered
unless sealed and filed with the Clerk and accompanied by a cash deposit,
cashier's check bid bond, or certified check payable to the Clerk for 5
percent of the amount of each bid.
ADOPTED BY WE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD
this 10th day of April, 2006,
WOODY LOVE, MAYOR
ATTEST:
CRAIG W. DAWSON, CITY ADMINISTRATOR/CLERK
CITY OF
SHOREWOOD
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD' SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927' (952) 474-3236
FAX {952} 474-0128. www.c!.shorewood.mn.us. cityhall@cLshorewood.mn.us
Celebratmg 50 Years' 1956 - 2006
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
April 7, 2006
TO:
Mayor and City Council Members
FROM:
Jean Panchyshyn, Executive Secretary/Deputy Clerk
CC:
Craig W. Dawson, City Administrator
RE:
TEMPORARY GAMBLING LICENSE - Lake Minnetl)nka Excelsil)r
Rl)tary Club
A request for a Temporary Gambling License arrived today, April 7, from the Lake
MinnetonkalExcelsior Rotary Club, The Rotary Club is respectfully requesting Council
consideration this Temporary Gambling License request at Council's meeting on Monday.
Therefore, this item will be added to the April 10 Council meeting agenda on Monday evening,
The Lake Minnetonka/Excelsior Rotary Club will be holding its annual charity golftournament
at the Minnetonka Country Club on August 21, 2006. They will be conducting a raffle drawing
at this event. They would like to begin selling raffles on April 21, 2006, To do so, they need
City and State approval for a Temporary Gambling License.
The President of the Lake Minnetonka/Excelsior Rotary Club will be present Monday evening,
should there be any questions from Council.
COUNCIL ACTION
Adoption of a Resolution Approving the Temporary Gambling License for the Lake
Minnetonka/Excelsior Rotary Club, for a raffle drawing to take place on Monday, August 21,
2006, at the Minnetonka Country Club, 24575 Smithtown Road in Shorewood,
,.' \
;\dd\'h 0 (\
n
"-" PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
RESOLUTION NO. 06-_
A RESOLUTION APPROVING
A TEMPORARY GAMBLING LICENSE
WHEREAS, the Shorewood City Code, Chapter 301, provides for the licensing of
certain gambling activities in the City; and
WHEREAS, the City prescribes certain restrictions concerning eligibility for such
licensing and application, whereby the licensee will hold the City harmless for all claims
arising out of the granting of such license; and
WHEREAS, the following applicant has met the eligibility requirements for such a
license and has agreed to all terms and conditions of the agreement contained in the
license,
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Shorewood as follows:
That a single temporary license for the conduct of gambling as specified in the
terms and conditions of the license be issued to Lake Minnetonka /Excelsior Rotary
Club. Said raffle to be held on Monday, August 21, 2006, at the Minnetonka
Country Club, 24575 Smithtown Road, Shorewood, MN 55331,
2006.
ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Shorewood this 10th day of April,
WOODY LOVE, MAYOR
ATTEST:
CRAIG W. DAWSON, CITY ADMINISTRATOR/CLERK
Minnesota Lawful Gambling
LG220 Application for Exempt Permit
An exempt permit may be Issued to nonprofit organizations
conducting lawful gambling activity on five or fewer days, and
awarding less than $50,000 in prizes during a calendar year.
Organization Information
Organization legal name
L.d 1\ I () Ait:'oID G?4
Slleet
"';1""\
Fee $50
Page 1 of2
11/04
For Board Use Only
Fee Paid
Check No.
Ex em:..
City
Previous license or exemption number, jf any
/'. , ,~
c{./ g'} L:;
State and zip code
At;:'
50(2.
;~st nam" . I
l'lc6; f-.-. %O/J
County
Type of nonprofit organization (check one)
D Fraternal D Religious
D Veteran ~. Other nonprofit organization
Type of proof of nonprofit - attach a copy (see instructions)
M Nonprofit Articles of Incorporation or Certificate of Good Standing - Minnesota Secretary of State's Office
D Internal Revenue Service
D Affiliate of parent nonprofit organization (charter)
I(
Gambling Premises Information
Name of piemises where gambling activity will be conducted (for raffles, list the site where the drawing will take place)
M (tJ IJ 6. t) ;) j('/J 'fi! {i .1;'
M_~~_~~ ~ . ~~ ~~
7S {, 'IIIt'Ii)A; ~ S If--;) !It,i(J{oD Aft IJ mil I) CPI
Date(s) of activity (for raffies, indicate t e date of the drawin9) ,
f i2 (L- 2 ~(C) 'liS 2ccf> _d(i1.11J i "J
Check the box or boxes that indicate the type of gambling activity your organization will be conducting:
D 'Bingo )S;:]' Raffies D 'Paddlewheels D 'Pull-Tabs D 'Tipboards
'Gambling equipment for pull-tabs, tlpboards, paddlewheels, and bingo (bingo paper, hard cards, and bingo ball
selection device) must be obtained from a distributor licensed by the Gambling Control Board. To find a licensed
distributor, go to www.gcb.state.mn.us and click on List of Licensed Distributors. Or call 651-639-4000.
This fonn will be made available in alternative
format (i.e. large print, Braille) upon request.
The information requested on this form (and
any attachments) will be used by the Gambling
Control Board (Board) to determine your
qualifications to be involved in lawful gambling
activities in Minnesota. You have the right to
refuse to supply the information requested;
however, if you refuse to supply this
infonnation, the Board may not be able to
determine your qualifications and, as a
consequence, may refuse to issue you a
permit. If you supply the information
requested, the Board will be able to process
your application.
Your name and and your organization's name
and address will be public information when
received by the Board. All the other information
that you provide will be private data about you
until the Board issues your permit. When the
Board issues your permit, all of the information
that you have provided to the Board in the
process of applying for your permit will become
public. If the Board does not issue you a
permit, all the information you have provided
in the process of applying for a permit remains
private, with the exception of your name and
your organization's name and address which
will remain public.
Private data about you are available only to
the following: Board members, staff of the
Board whose work assignment requires that
they have access to the information; the
Minnesota Department of Public Safety; the
Minnesota Attorney General; the Minnesota
Commissioners of Administration, Finance,
and Revenue; the Minnesota Legislative
Auditor, national and international gambling
regulatory agencies; anyone pursuant to court
order; other individuals and agencies that are
specifically authorized by state or federal law
to have access to the information; individuals
and agencies for which law or legal order
authorizes a new use or sharing of information
after this Notice was given; and anyone with
your consent.
LG220 Application for Exempt Permit
Organization Name
Local Unit of Government Acknowledgment
If the gambling premises is within city limits, the
city must sign this application.
On behalf of the city, I acknowledge this application.
Page 2 of 2
11/04
Check the action that
the city is taking on this application.
O The city approves the application with no
waiting period.
O The city approves the application with a 30 day
waiting period, and allows the Board to issue a
permit after 30 days (60 days for a first class
city).
o The city denies the application,
Print name of city
Signature of city personnel receiving application
-ntle
Date_I--.-l_
If the gambling premises is located in a township, both
the county and township must sign this application.
On behalf of the county, I acknowledge this application,
Check the action that
the county is taking on this application.
o The county approves the application with no
waiting period.
o The county approves the application with a 30 day
waiting period, and allows the Board to issue a
permit after 30 days.
o The county denies the application,
Print name of county
Signature of county personnel receiving application
-ntle
Date----1--.-l_
TOWNSHIP: On behalf of the township, I acknowledge that
the organization is applying for exempted gambling activity
within the township limits. [Atownship has no statutory
authority to approve or deny an application
(Minnesota Statute 349,213, subd. 2).1
Print name of township
Signature of township official acknowledging application
mle
Date----1----1_
Chief Executive Officer's Signature
The information provided in this application is complete and accurate to best of my knowledge. I acknowledge that the
financial report will be completed and return. the Gam ' 9 Co ro oard within 30 days of the date of our gambling
activity, ~
Chief executive officer's signature ~ --
,;-:) i'. rO
Name (please print) , ( c..o S 5 IV[ (. ~'4--:5'hW.' . ~ 128,[)//ftv.Jir
Mail application and attachments
Complete an application for each
gambling activity:
one day of gambling activity
.. two or more consecutive days of
gambling activity
each day a raffie drawing is held
DateS2!D..f"J al
Send:
the completed application,
a copy of your proof of nonprofit status (see instructions), and
a $50 application fee. Make check payable to "State of Minnesota".
To: Gambling Control Board
1711 West County Road B, Suite 300 South
Roseville, MN 55113