91-026
~
'J'
3/22/91
.
RESOLUTION NO.
26-91
A RESOLUTION RECEIVING PETITION AND
ORDERING PREPARATION OF
FEASIBILITY REPORT ON CONSTRUCTION OF
PINE BEND WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENT
WHEREAS, a petition has been received requesting construction of a
certain local improvement involving the extension of a municipal watermain to
serve the Pine Bend area, and to assess the benefited property for all or a
portion of the cost of the improvement, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes
Chapter 429.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the
City of Shorewood as follows:
1. That the said petition for the Pine Bend Watermain Improvement
filed with the Shorewood City Council on March 11, 1991, is hereby declared
to be signed by the required percentage of owners of property affected
thereby. T his declaration is made in conformity to Minnesota Statutes
Section 429.035.
. 2. That the said petition requesting Pine Bend Watermain
Improvement be referred to Orr-Schelen-Mayeron & Associates, City engineers,
for study and that they are instructed to report to the Council with all
convenient speed advising the Council in a preliminary way as to whether the
proposed improvement is feasible and as to whether it should best be made as
proposed or in connection with some other improvement, and the estimated cost
of the improvement as recommended.
3. That this authorization is made with the understanding that the
cost of such report to the City of Shorewood shall not exceed the sum of
$2,000.00.
ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
11th day of March, 1991.
CITY OF SHOREWOOD this
~/J!l~/~dJ
&~~ra J. d(;a~cel, Mayor
ATTEST:
Bradley J. Nielsen
Acting City Administrator/Clerk
.
Roll Call Vote:
Ayes - Braneel, Gagne, Daugherty, Lewis, Stover
Nays - 0
Published in the SAILO R NEWSPAPER on
3 Apri 1
, 1991.
.
TO: SHOREWOOD CITY COUNCIL
FROM: RESIDENTS OF PINE BEND
RE: CITY WATER
FILE COpy
~6-J) 0J~
Z~
~
f
WE, THE FOLLOWING RESIDENTS OF PINE BEND AND ROWARDS POINT ROAD,
WOULD LIKE A FEASIBILITY STUDY TO Db.""TERMINE THE COST TO EXTEND CITY
WATER FROM ~TRIDGE DRIVE. WE UNDERSTAND TInS DOES NOT OBLIGATE
US TO ACCEPT WATER UNTIL THE COST OF THE PROJECT IS DETERMINED. WE OF
COURSE, WOULD ASSUME ANY COSTS FOR THE STUDY, IF WE REJECT THE PROPOSRD
PROJECT, OTHERWISE THE STUDY COSTS BJ:i.:COME PART OF THE PROJECT COST.
NAME
ADDRESS
.
1.
~. S-s-tR)#-~/y:
~ ~ . ~1'-17s ~ !f&1ce
~? ~~yC?cd)#tc(
a&f ~ f2t /~
J74tm ~ ~ rJd,
~7~'>~ ~C{ ~
,~_~:""""~4<~ ...... -;7 .'. .
~;!~;~451J !~j3>>~
2.
7.
5.
6.
8.
,~~ a- ~h--~~L.- ~ ;--/
~ ~ ~ ~.~ ~ '1~h--~
~~~~~.~~"